newswars--2020-02-28--Chemicals Found in Tap Water Linked to Cancer, Brain Damage, Fetal Toxicity

Hollywood seems to love a good David versus corporate Goliath tale , and the stories it brings to the silver screen not infrequently revolve around real-life contamination of community water .
Twenty years ago , the film Erin Brockovich called attention to a cancer-causing chemical dumped in a California community by Pacific Gas & Electric , while the recent film Dark Waters focuses on DuPont ’ s contamination of a West Virginia town ’ s water with the chemical PFOA ( perfluorooctanoic acid ) .
Outside of Tinseltown , occurrences such as the 2014 lead debacle in Flint , Michigan—and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s cognition and behavior—have helped ensure that water-quality-related incidents continue to get occasional media attention .
PFOA belongs to a wider family of chemicals called PFAS ( per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances ) .
The scientific evidence clearly indicates that drinking water contaminants such as PFAS , lead and many others—as well as the fluoride that , incredibly , is intentionally added to drinking water—are not doing anyone any good .
However , these exposures are of particular concern for children .
This is because growing children drink more water than adults ( per @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exquisitely vulnerable to adverse developmental effects .
As the Environmental Working Group ( EWG ) points out , “ A baby fed exclusively powdered formula mixed with tap water drinks the most water for its small size of any age group ” ; in this scenario , tap water may represent up to 85 % of a formula-fed baby ’ s diet .
Water systems in many of the nation ’ s largest cities routinely violate Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ) safety standards for drinking water .
This observation was confirmed in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from close to 50,000 water companies and utilities nationwide ( 2010-2015 ) , which found over 250 tap water contaminants and identified studies linking many of these chemicals to cancer ; brain and nervous system damage ; fetal toxicity ; impaired fertility ; and hormone disruption .
EWG concluded that millions of American children are exposed to unsafe levels of contaminants in municipal water supplies ( with an unknown number of children exposed via unmonitored private wells ) —and in this context , even “ a passing grade from the federal government ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in manufacturing and consumer products , are one of the more well-documented and worrisome drinking water contaminants .
Environmental groups have dubbed PFAS “ forever chemicals ” because they resist degradation and build up in the blood and organs .
Although other routes of exposure ( such as food , house dust and indoor air ) are also significant , the chemicals ’ “ extremely durable ” and water-soluble properties have facilitated widespread PFAS infiltration of community water supplies and private wells around the world , even in the most remote areas .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ tap water have increased significantly since the late 1980s .
Research shows that virtually everyone on the planet now harbors PFAS in their bloodstream .
One nationally representative U.S. study detected the compounds in the blood of 99 % of American adults and adolescents age 12 and up .
Although some countries have banned or begun to phase out certain PFAS compounds , the chemicals ’ propensity to bioaccumulate—and the continued or increased use of other PFAS compounds—means that the PFAS body burden remains high .
For children , the implications of PFAS @ @ @ @ @ @ @ range of potential effects that may begin in utero and continue into adulthood .
Possible adverse outcomes include : • Effects on levels of sex hormones and insulin-like growth factor 1 , both of which play a critical role in growth and sexual maturation Lead is another persistent substance that lingers without breaking down .
Although the U.S. banned lead-based paints in the late 1970s and leaded gasoline in the mid-1990s , lead components of water delivery systems continue to constitute an environmental and health disaster .
Government toxicologists describe lead as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ system , ” and especially the developing brain .
There is no safe threshold for lead exposure .
In 2016 , a USA Today analysis of EPA data found that the agency had detected lead levels in excess of EPA standards in almost 2,000 community water systems from all 50 states , with over a third displaying levels “ more than double the EPA ’ s action level limit ” and many rivaling or exceeding the alarming levels detected in Flint , Michigan .
Some of the highest lead levels were at schools @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the “ stunning ” level of lead in the water met the EPA ’ s threshold for hazardous waste .
Moreover , drinking water contamination with brain-damaging lead had often persisted for months or years without redress , and almost one in ten water systems had never notified the public .
Among its many dangerous properties , lead can pass through the blood-brain barrier and cause damage to various regions of the brain linked to neurologic disorders .
In the aftermath of the lead poisoning of Flint ’ s water supply , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proficiency in exposed children , and the proportion of students qualifying for special education services nearly doubled .
A veteran teacher in the Flint school system stated , “ We have a school district where all that ’ s left are damaged kids who are being exposed to other damaged kids , and it ’ s causing more damage , ” while a Flint superintendent reported that the schools “ were bracing for an ‘ evolving , educational emergency.
’ ” Even more concerning , a Reuters analysis later showed that Flint is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s most dangerous “ lead hotspots ” ; Reuters found “ nearly 3,000 areas with recently recorded lead poisoning rates at least double those in Flint during the peak of that city ’ s contamination crisis , ” with blood lead levels at least four times higher than Flint ’ s in more than a third of those communities .
Fluoride stands apart from other water contaminants in that water systems add it to drinking water on purpose .
More Americans drink fluoridated water than in all other countries combined .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an avalanche of evidence that the chemical—an industrial waste product—is lowering IQ and that fluoride produces neurodevelopmental toxicity “ comparable to the effects of lead.
” In addition to effects on cognition , studies have linked fluoride to behavioral symptoms of inattention and diagnosed attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) as well as to numerous health risks , including an increased risk of bone cancer .
The authors of studies highlighting fluoride ’ s effects on IQ are particularly concerned about the developmental impact of systemic fluoride ingestion and advise pregnant women not to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Pregnancy and Fluoride Do Not Mix , cites hundreds of studies linking fluoride to premature birth ( pointing out that rates of premature birth are “ unusually high ” in the U.S. ) as well as preeclampsia , impaired neurological development and autism .
The ostensible rationale for U.S. water fluoridation—prevention of tooth decay—does not hold up to scrutiny , because tooth decay rates have been steadily declining in countries that have never practiced water fluoridation .
In light of the growing awareness that chemicals can exert greater effects in combination with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s finding that U.S. tap water contains at least 250 contaminants is hardly reassuring .
Studies suggest , for example , that chemicals not found to be cancer-causing on their own “ might act together to promote the process of carcinogenesis.
” Although scientists still tend to study one chemical at a time , there are calls to “ elucidate and define combinatory actions , ” with an entire scientific journal now dedicated to considering “ different dose and effect levels , .
.
.
optimal combination ratios or sequences and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ addition , EWG researchers are calling for “ a shift towards aggregate and cumulative assessment of chemical contaminants , ” particularly for drinking water .
Applying a “ cumulative cancer risk framework ” to drinking water data , they reported in 2019 that the national attributable cancer risk due to tap water contaminants was two orders of magnitude higher than the benchmark risk level used by the EPA and other regulatory agencies .
Stated another way , for the 86 % of the U.S. population served by community water systems , tap water @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ equivalent to 4 lifetime cancer cases per 10,000 people ” rather than one case per million .
The researchers also noted that their estimate is likely to be conservative due to missing data for many contaminants that are either unmonitored , infrequently monitored or out of compliance with monitoring and reporting requirements .
Back in 1996 , the Food Quality Protection Act established a requirement that the EPA “ set allowable levels for pesticides in a way that would ‘ ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ ” ; the Act also stipulated an additional tenfold margin of safety “ to account for pre- and postnatal toxicity.
” A subsequent analysis found that the EPA had failed to apply the additional margin of safety for the majority of pesticides reviewed .
Unfortunately , the same phenomenon seems to hold true for drinking water contaminants .
One of the important conclusions drawn by EWG and others is that mere compliance with national drinking water standards is far from a guarantee that contaminant levels are safe , especially for children .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Show to break down the pitfalls being set for Trump amid the coronavirus outbreak .

Hollywood seems to love a good David versus corporate Goliath tale, and the stories it brings to the silver screen not infrequently revolve around real-life contamination of community water.
Twenty years ago, the film Erin Brockovich called attention to a cancer-causing chemical dumped in a California community by Pacific Gas & Electric, while the recent film Dark Waters focuses on DuPont’s contamination of a West Virginia town’s water with the chemical PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid). Outside of Tinseltown, occurrences such as the 2014 lead debacle in Flint, Michigan—and especially its dramatic impact on children’s cognition and behavior—have helped ensure that water-quality-related incidents continue to get occasional media attention.
PFOA belongs to a wider family of chemicals called PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). The scientific evidence clearly indicates that drinking water contaminants such as PFAS, lead and many others—as well as the fluoride that, incredibly, is intentionally added to drinking water—are not doing anyone any good. However, these exposures are of particular concern for children. This is because growing children drink more water than adults (per pound of body weight) and are exquisitely vulnerable to adverse developmental effects. As the Environmental Working Group (EWG) points out, “A baby fed exclusively powdered formula mixed with tap water drinks the most water for its small size of any age group”; in this scenario, tap water may represent up to 85% of a formula-fed baby’s diet.
Water systems in many of the nation’s largest cities routinely violate Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) safety standards for drinking water. This observation was confirmed in a comprehensive EWG review of reports collected from close to 50,000 water companies and utilities nationwide (2010-2015), which found over 250 tap water contaminants and identified studies linking many of these chemicals to cancer; brain and nervous system damage; fetal toxicity; impaired fertility; and hormone disruption. EWG concluded that millions of American children are exposed to unsafe levels of contaminants in municipal water supplies (with an unknown number of children exposed via unmonitored private wells)—and in this context, even “a passing grade from the federal government” means little.
Pervasive PFAS
PFAS, extensively used in manufacturing and consumer products, are one of the more well-documented and worrisome drinking water contaminants. Environmental groups have dubbed PFAS “forever chemicals” because they resist degradation and build up in the blood and organs. Although other routes of exposure (such as food, house dust and indoor air) are also significant, the chemicals’ “extremely durable” and water-soluble properties have facilitated widespread PFAS infiltration of community water supplies and private wells around the world, even in the most remote areas. In the U.S., PFAS levels in tap water have increased significantly since the late 1980s.
Research shows that virtually everyone on the planet now harbors PFAS in their bloodstream. One nationally representative U.S. study detected the compounds in the blood of 99% of American adults and adolescents age 12 and up. Although some countries have banned or begun to phase out certain PFAS compounds, the chemicals’ propensity to bioaccumulate—and the continued or increased use of other PFAS compounds—means that the PFAS body burden remains high.
For children, the implications of PFAS exposure are profound, with a wide range of potential effects that may begin in utero and continue into adulthood. Possible adverse outcomes include:
Lingering Lead
Lead is another persistent substance that lingers without breaking down. Although the U.S. banned lead-based paints in the late 1970s and leaded gasoline in the mid-1990s, lead components of water delivery systems continue to constitute an environmental and health disaster. Government toxicologists describe lead as a “systemic toxicant affecting virtually every organ system,” and especially the developing brain. There is no safe threshold for lead exposure.
In 2016, a USA Today analysis of EPA data found that the agency had detected lead levels in excess of EPA standards in almost 2,000 community water systems from all 50 states, with over a third displaying levels “more than double the EPA’s action level limit” and many rivaling or exceeding the alarming levels detected in Flint, Michigan. Some of the highest lead levels were at schools and day care centers—in one elementary school, the “stunning” level of lead in the water met the EPA’s threshold for hazardous waste. Moreover, drinking water contamination with brain-damaging lead had often persisted for months or years without redress, and almost one in ten water systems had never notified the public.
Among its many dangerous properties, lead can pass through the blood-brain barrier and cause damage to various regions of the brain linked to neurologic disorders. In the aftermath of the lead poisoning of Flint’s water supply, the city observed a decline in reading proficiency in exposed children, and the proportion of students qualifying for special education services nearly doubled. A veteran teacher in the Flint school system stated, “We have a school district where all that’s left are damaged kids who are being exposed to other damaged kids, and it’s causing more damage,” while a Flint superintendent reported that the schools “were bracing for an ‘evolving, educational emergency.’” Even more concerning, a Reuters analysis later showed that Flint is far from being one of the nation’s most dangerous “lead hotspots”; Reuters found “nearly 3,000 areas with recently recorded lead poisoning rates at least double those in Flint during the peak of that city’s contamination crisis,” with blood lead levels at least four times higher than Flint’s in more than a third of those communities.
Flagrantly Unjustifiable Fluoride
Fluoride stands apart from other water contaminants in that water systems add it to drinking water on purpose. More Americans drink fluoridated water than in all other countries combined. This CDC-endorsed practice has persisted for decades despite an avalanche of evidence that the chemical—an industrial waste product—is lowering IQ and that fluoride produces neurodevelopmental toxicity “comparable to the effects of lead.” In addition to effects on cognition, studies have linked fluoride to behavioral symptoms of inattention and diagnosed attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) as well as to numerous health risks, including an increased risk of bone cancer.
The authors of studies highlighting fluoride’s effects on IQ are particularly concerned about the developmental impact of systemic fluoride ingestion and advise pregnant women not to drink fluoridated water. The 2017 book, Pregnancy and Fluoride Do Not Mix, cites hundreds of studies linking fluoride to premature birth (pointing out that rates of premature birth are “unusually high” in the U.S.) as well as preeclampsia, impaired neurological development and autism. The ostensible rationale for U.S. water fluoridation—prevention of tooth decay—does not hold up to scrutiny, because tooth decay rates have been steadily declining in countries that have never practiced water fluoridation.
Chemicals in Combination
In light of the growing awareness that chemicals can exert greater effects in combination with other chemicals—a principle known as synergy—the EWG’s finding that U.S. tap water contains at least 250 contaminants is hardly reassuring. Studies suggest, for example, that chemicals not found to be cancer-causing on their own “might act together to promote the process of carcinogenesis.” Although scientists still tend to study one chemical at a time, there are calls to “elucidate and define combinatory actions,” with an entire scientific journal now dedicated to considering “different dose and effect levels, . . . optimal combination ratios or sequences and the prevention of potential adverse events.”
In addition, EWG researchers are calling for “a shift towards aggregate and cumulative assessment of chemical contaminants,” particularly for drinking water. Applying a “cumulative cancer risk framework” to drinking water data, they reported in 2019 that the national attributable cancer risk due to tap water contaminants was two orders of magnitude higher than the benchmark risk level used by the EPA and other regulatory agencies. Stated another way, for the 86% of the U.S. population served by community water systems, tap water contaminants accounted for a cumulative lifetime risk “equivalent to 4 lifetime cancer cases per 10,000 people” rather than one case per million. The researchers also noted that their estimate is likely to be conservative due to missing data for many contaminants that are either unmonitored, infrequently monitored or out of compliance with monitoring and reporting requirements.
Back in 1996, the Food Quality Protection Act established a requirement that the EPA “set allowable levels for pesticides in a way that would ‘ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from aggregate exposure’”; the Act also stipulated an additional tenfold margin of safety “to account for pre- and postnatal toxicity.” A subsequent analysis found that the EPA had failed to apply the additional margin of safety for the majority of pesticides reviewed. Unfortunately, the same phenomenon seems to hold true for drinking water contaminants. One of the important conclusions drawn by EWG and others is that mere compliance with national drinking water standards is far from a guarantee that contaminant levels are safe, especially for children.
Mike Adams guest hosts The Alex Jones Show to break down the pitfalls being set for Trump amid the coronavirus outbreak.


newswars--2020-02-28--President Bolsonaro’s Son Talks With Infowars About Global Awakening

Alex Jones and Eduardo Bolsonaro , the son of the Brazilian populist President Jair Bolsonaro , had a powerful discussion during CPAC on the rise of nationalism seen across the world .
“ We are reacting , we are showing to the people that we conservatives , we that want to have a family have a voice , ” said Eduardo .
The duo also discussed the looming evils of socialism and communism and the mainstream media ’ s role in its biased coverage that favors globalism .
“ I mean , when you talk about the stabbing attack on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ ll find much of the press didn ’ t say that the stabbing was committed by a former member of the Socialism and Liberty Party in Brazil , ” said Eduardo .
Jones brought up Project Veritas ’ groundbreaking revelations on Bernie Sanders ’ campaign in response .
“ Let ’ s speak on that , ” said Jones .
“ Bernie Sanders ’ s campaign people all over have been saying they want to put people in camps , they want to kill everybody.
” “ That ’ s what communists @ @ @ @ @ @ @ killed by a socialist , by a communist .
And when they attack , when they shoot members of congress like Scalise , they will not say anything .
These people are violent .
”

Alex Jones and Eduardo Bolsonaro, the son of the Brazilian populist President Jair Bolsonaro, had a powerful discussion during CPAC on the rise of nationalism seen across the world.
“We are reacting, we are showing to the people that we conservatives, we that want to have a family have a voice,” said Eduardo.
The duo also discussed the looming evils of socialism and communism and the mainstream media’s role in its biased coverage that favors globalism.
“I mean, when you talk about the stabbing attack on my father during the elections, you’ll find much of the press didn’t say that the stabbing was committed by a former member of the Socialism and Liberty Party in Brazil,” said Eduardo.
Jones brought up Project Veritas’ groundbreaking revelations on Bernie Sanders’ campaign in response.
“Let’s speak on that,” said Jones. “Bernie Sanders’s campaign people all over have been saying they want to put people in camps, they want to kill everybody.”
“That’s what communists do, and your father was almost killed by a socialist, by a communist. And when they attack, when they shoot members of congress like Scalise, they will not say anything. These people are violent.”


newswars--2020-02-28--Flashback: Alex Jones Returns To Joe Rogan Podcast

We made up 😜 About to go live with @ real_alexjones http : //JoeRogan.live

View this post on Instagram
We made up 😜 About to go live with @real_alexjones http://JoeRogan.live


newswars--2020-02-28--The Coronavirus Trajectory Has Spun Out Of Control

The level of calamity we are facing due to the half measures by states like California to handle the coronavirus outbreak is enough for any half-conscious person to scramble to get their bug-out survival gear ready .
For example , the CDC in Northern California took 4 days to test someone who proved positive for Coranvirus of unknown origin .
What we are witnessing is sloppy and lackadaisical in the extreme .
And those bug-out bags could suffer as a face mask shortage of standard surgical masks and even n95 respirators is already in full swing .
Additionally , no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and prepare for the man-made nature of this Frankenstein coranavirus are willing to at the very least face it head-on , as the virus is reinfecting those who had been cured .
Meanwhile , the Democrats , in true anti-American fervor , are turning this nightmare into a partisan knife in the Trump administration ’ s back .
The Gates Foundation and their partners in Big Pharma wait in the wings with their offering of the ID2020 Alliance and its goal to microchip everyone on earth as the window of opportunity to push @ @ @ @ @ @ @ opens up .

The level of calamity we are facing due to the half measures by states like California to handle the coronavirus outbreak is enough for any half-conscious person to scramble to get their bug-out survival gear ready.
For example, the CDC in Northern California took 4 days to test someone who proved positive for Coranvirus of unknown origin.
What we are witnessing is sloppy and lackadaisical in the extreme.
And those bug-out bags could suffer as a face mask shortage of standard surgical masks and even n95 respirators is already in full swing.
Additionally, no one with the power to face reality and prepare for the man-made nature of this Frankenstein coranavirus are willing to at the very least face it head-on, as the virus is reinfecting those who had been cured.
Meanwhile, the Democrats, in true anti-American fervor, are turning this nightmare into a partisan knife in the Trump administration’s back.
The Gates Foundation and their partners in Big Pharma wait in the wings with their offering of the ID2020 Alliance and its goal to microchip everyone on earth as the window of opportunity to push free and mandatory vaccinations upon the populace opens up.


newswars--2020-02-28--Video: Father Fresh Out Of Coronavirus Quarantine Repeatedly Coughs On Air

A Pennsylvania father who was recently cleared of coronavirus after being quarantined in San Diego , California could not stop coughing during an interview with Fox News on Friday .
Frank Wucinski and his family were sent to the quarantine location after returning from Wuhan , China where they were attending a funeral for Wucinski ’ s father-in-law .
“ Fortunately , it is contagious , but the death rate is pretty low , ” Wucinski said during the Fox interview , as he stopped to cough while his young daughter sat on his lap .
When the Fox hosts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about it , he responded , “ They said I ’ m fine .
I got tested twice .
Negative both times .
The cough , probably just nerves.
” Wucinski had to take a swig from his daughter ’ s water bottle just to get through the interview .
As coronavirus fears continue to escalate , stocks worldwide are responding and governments are preparing for worst-case scenarios .
The level of calamity we are facing due to the half measures by states like California to handle the Coronavirus outbreak is enough for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their bug-out survival gear ready .

A Pennsylvania father who was recently cleared of coronavirus after being quarantined in San Diego, California could not stop coughing during an interview with Fox News on Friday.
Frank Wucinski and his family were sent to the quarantine location after returning from Wuhan, China where they were attending a funeral for Wucinski’s father-in-law.
“Fortunately, it is contagious, but the death rate is pretty low,” Wucinski said during the Fox interview, as he stopped to cough while his young daughter sat on his lap.
When the Fox hosts noticed Wucinski was still coughing and asked about it, he responded, “They said I’m fine. I got tested twice. Negative both times. The cough, probably just nerves.”
Wucinski had to take a swig from his daughter’s water bottle just to get through the interview.
As coronavirus fears continue to escalate, stocks worldwide are responding and governments are preparing for worst-case scenarios.
The level of calamity we are facing due to the half measures by states like California to handle the Coronavirus outbreak is enough for any half-conscious person to scramble to get their bug-out survival gear ready.


newswars--2020-02-28--Watch: Woman Born Without Limb Thanks Mom For Not Aborting Her – Despite Doctors Offering It As An O

Watch: Woman Born Without Limb Thanks Mom For Not Aborting Her – Despite Doctors Offering It As An Option

A young girl thanked her mother for giving birth to her , despite abortion being offered as an option after doctors warned she ’ d be born without an arm .
The 17-year-old girl , who goes by the handle @ MarinCarter , explained in a viral Tik Tok video that she was asked as a Trump supporter about her views on abortion .
Marin explains doctors advised her mother while she was four months pregnant that Marin would be born without an arm , and at that point gave her the option to have an abortion , which Marin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you didn ’ t know , I was born missing my hand , and when my mom first found out about it she was about four months pregnant with me and the doctor immediately said that abortion was an option , ” Marin states .
“ And I want you all to know that , I know this isn ’ t all cases , but some people consider it .
I ’ ve been on this Earth for about 17 years and maybe it takes me a little bit more time , or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but that ’ s not the case .
“ I enjoy everyday that I ’ m alive and sometimes , yeah , I get caught up in the emotions , but I ’ m happy to be alive and I ’ m glad that I was born this way .
I ’ m glad that God made me this way .
It gives me challenges .
It gives me things that I have to face , but every day is a gift from God .
And it just pains me that some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ children and take their children ’ s lives .
So I just thought I ’ d say… ‘ Trump 2020.
’ ” The pro-life message is refreshing , especially as more Tik Tok videos continue to highlight young people celebrating and glorifying abortion .
Last month , the Chinese-owned Tik Tok platform moved to ban pro-life group Live Action for violating community guidelines over an anti-abortion video , but later reinstated the group following major backlash .
Leftists are praising a doctor who made a Tik Tok dance video encouraging children as young @ @ @ @ @ @ @ abortion and sexually transmitted diseases without their parents ’ knowledge .

A young girl thanked her mother for giving birth to her, despite abortion being offered as an option after doctors warned she’d be born without an arm.
The 17-year-old girl, who goes by the handle @MarinCarter, explained in a viral Tik Tok video that she was asked as a Trump supporter about her views on abortion.
Marin explains doctors advised her mother while she was four months pregnant that Marin would be born without an arm, and at that point gave her the option to have an abortion, which Marin is thankful she refused.
“If you didn’t know, I was born missing my hand, and when my mom first found out about it she was about four months pregnant with me and the doctor immediately said that abortion was an option,” Marin states.
“And I want you all to know that, I know this isn’t all cases, but some people consider it. I’ve been on this Earth for about 17 years and maybe it takes me a little bit more time, or maybe I need help doing some things, but that’s not the case.
“I enjoy everyday that I’m alive and sometimes, yeah, I get caught up in the emotions, but I’m happy to be alive and I’m glad that I was born this way. I’m glad that God made me this way. It gives me challenges. It gives me things that I have to face, but every day is a gift from God. And it just pains me that some people will take that away from their children and take their children’s lives. So I just thought I’d say… ‘Trump 2020.’”
The pro-life message is refreshing, especially as more Tik Tok videos continue to highlight young people celebrating and glorifying abortion.
Last month, the Chinese-owned Tik Tok platform moved to ban pro-life group Live Action for violating community guidelines over an anti-abortion video, but later reinstated the group following major backlash.
Leftists are praising a doctor who made a Tik Tok dance video encouraging children as young as 12 to see their doctor about abortion and sexually transmitted diseases without their parents’ knowledge.


newswars--2020-02-28--Money Supply Growth Climbs to 36-Month High

The money supply growth rate rose again in January , climbing to a 36-month high .
The last time the growth rate was higher was during February of 2017 , when the growth rate was 7.9 percent .
During January 2020 , year-over-year ( YOY ) growth in the money supply was at 6.32 percent .
That ’ s up from December ’ s rate of 5.53 percent , and up from January 2019 ’ s rate of 3.38 percent .
The increase in money supply growth in January represents a sizable reversal of the trend we saw during most @ @ @ @ @ @ @ growth rate hit a 120-month low , falling to the lowest growth rates we ’ d seen since 2007 .
If the trend continues , growth rates will need only a few months to reach the heights reached from 2009 to 2016 .
The money supply metric used here—the “ true ” or Rothbard-Salerno money supply measure ( TMS ) —is the metric developed by Murray Rothbard and Joseph Salerno , and is designed to provide a better measure of money supply fluctuations than M2 .
The Mises Institute now offers regular updates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This measure of the money supply differs from M2 in that it includes Treasury deposits at the Fed ( and excludes short-time deposits , traveler ’ s checks , and retail money funds ) .
The M2 growth rate also increased in January , growing 6.98 percent compared to December ’ s growth rate of 6.76 percent .
M2 grew 4.16 percent during January of last year .
The M2 growth rate had fallen considerably from late 2016 to late 2018 , but has been growing again in recent months .
Money supply @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of economic activity .
During periods of economic boom , money supply tends to grow quickly as banks make more loans .
Recessions , on the other hand , tend to be preceded by periods of slowdown in rates of money supply growth .
However , money supply growth tends to grow out of its low-growth trough before the onset of recession .
If the US enters recession or a significant slowdown during the next two years , this dynamic would appear to still hold .
Moreover , periods preceding recessions often show @ @ @ @ @ @ @ TMS growth .
We saw this in 2006–7 and in 2000–1 .
The gap between M2 and TMS narrowed considerably from 2011 through 2015 , but has widened since then .
Even with recent jumps in TMS growth levels , M2 is still consistently growing faster than the TMS .
The overall M2 total money supply in January was $ 15.4 trillion , and the TMS total was $ 14.2 trillion .
The growth in the money supply is at least in part tied to the fact the Federal Reserve grew more accommodative @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Market Committee ( FOMC ) has cut the target fed funds rate more than once in recent months , but the big change was in the Fed ’ s late-2019 moves to increase its balance sheet again .
Since late August , the Fed added more than $ 400 billion to its total assets in an effort to provide a “ blast of cash ” for the repo market .
The Fed apparently has concluded that the market requires additional liquidity and has acted accordingly .
Fed assets are now headed back to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ flattened since late January .
Another change partially driving the increase in the TMS is the large increase in “ Treasury deposits at the Fed ” that we ’ ve seen in recent months .
In January , this sum reached a 39-month high of $ 387 billion .
The last time Treasury deposits reached this level was during November 2016 , when deposits hit $ 400 billion .

The money supply growth rate rose again in January, climbing to a 36-month high. The last time the growth rate was higher was during February of 2017, when the growth rate was 7.9 percent.
During January 2020, year-over-year (YOY) growth in the money supply was at 6.32 percent. That’s up from December’s rate of 5.53 percent, and up from January 2019’s rate of 3.38 percent. The increase in money supply growth in January represents a sizable reversal of the trend we saw during most of 2019. In August, the growth rate hit a 120-month low, falling to the lowest growth rates we’d seen since 2007. If the trend continues, growth rates will need only a few months to reach the heights reached from 2009 to 2016.
The money supply metric used here—the “true” or Rothbard-Salerno money supply measure (TMS)—is the metric developed by Murray Rothbard and Joseph Salerno, and is designed to provide a better measure of money supply fluctuations than M2. The Mises Institute now offers regular updates on this metric and its growth. This measure of the money supply differs from M2 in that it includes Treasury deposits at the Fed (and excludes short-time deposits, traveler’s checks, and retail money funds).
The M2 growth rate also increased in January, growing 6.98 percent compared to December’s growth rate of 6.76 percent. M2 grew 4.16 percent during January of last year. The M2 growth rate had fallen considerably from late 2016 to late 2018, but has been growing again in recent months.
Money supply growth can often be a helpful measure of economic activity. During periods of economic boom, money supply tends to grow quickly as banks make more loans. Recessions, on the other hand, tend to be preceded by periods of slowdown in rates of money supply growth. However, money supply growth tends to grow out of its low-growth trough before the onset of recession. If the US enters recession or a significant slowdown during the next two years, this dynamic would appear to still hold.
Moreover, periods preceding recessions often show a growing gap between M2 growth and TMS growth. We saw this in 2006–7 and in 2000–1. The gap between M2 and TMS narrowed considerably from 2011 through 2015, but has widened since then. Even with recent jumps in TMS growth levels, M2 is still consistently growing faster than the TMS.
The overall M2 total money supply in January was $15.4 trillion, and the TMS total was $14.2 trillion.
The growth in the money supply is at least in part tied to the fact the Federal Reserve grew more accommodative in late 2019. The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) has cut the target fed funds rate more than once in recent months, but the big change was in the Fed’s late-2019 moves to increase its balance sheet again. Since late August, the Fed added more than $400 billion to its total assets in an effort to provide a “blast of cash” for the repo market. The Fed apparently has concluded that the market requires additional liquidity and has acted accordingly. Fed assets are now headed back to former peak levels, although totals have flattened since late January.
Another change partially driving the increase in the TMS is the large increase in “Treasury deposits at the Fed” that we’ve seen in recent months. In January, this sum reached a 39-month high of $387 billion. The last time Treasury deposits reached this level was during November 2016, when deposits hit $400 billion.


newswars--2020-02-28--Why Don’t Pro-Tax Millionaires Just Pay More Tax Voluntarily?

One need not look far for evidence that many Americans want to help the poor .
One obvious piece of that evidence is that many give substantial amounts of time , effort , and money to do so .
But given that evidence , why do we need government to be so substantially involved in redistribution , backed by coercion , rather than relying on individuals and voluntary associations to provide charity ?
One argument that has been made involves the free rider problem , the argument that leaving charity to voluntary efforts would result in less charity than we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In a nutshell , the problem is that my personal contribution , at most , will have virtually no effect in reducing poverty , so that even though I want to do something about it , I don ’ t contribute because the problem of poverty is so large relative to my resources .
This argument has led to the conclusion that we need government , and its ability to coerce people , to tax us ( more than we would have voluntarily given ) to force us to give “ what we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could make the “ donors ” better off despite the coercion involved .
I have long thought this was an unsatisfying argument with several problems .
As E.C .
Pasour wrote , “ The free rider concept…has also been widely misused in the case of charity.
” In particular , although it is true that my potential contributions are far too small to appreciably reduce the existence of poverty , which could potentially trigger a free rider problem in reducing poverty , my potential contributions are large enough that I can do something @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or group I encounter or discover .
I can make an appreciable difference to them .
For such circumstances and choices , the standard free rider story for why I don ’ t give would not seem to apply , unless people are assumed to care about poverty but not about those poor individuals they encounter or discover , which seems a very odd combination of preferences .
We can also join with others in groups , where our contributions are more impactful in particular areas ( this was , in fact , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ church where I was in charge of charitable giving for years ) .
However , that is not the biggest problem I have with the “ government coercion makes us give what we really want to ” argument .
To the extent that the free rider problem does arise , it is true that government intervention can change how much charity is provided , but the result is not necessarily closer to what we “ really ” want to give than what we give voluntarily .
A big reason for this is what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was a ( wildly optimistic ) one-in-a-million chance that your vote would swing an electoral outcome to a result benefiting you by $ 10,000 .
Viewed instrumentally—solely as a means to an improved end—the expected value of that vote is one cent ( $ 10,000 divided by 1 million ) .
Such a small payoff can not explain choosing to vote , much less adamant support for a particular candidate or measure .
If the payoff in the same circumstance was $ 1 million , its instrumental value would be one dollar ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) , which would generate virtually identical results .
However , people often also care about the expressive value of voting—what they feel their vote says about them .
They might want to vote for something because it makes them feel better by , say , embellishing a noble self-characterization or “ cheering ” for a position they wish to be associated with .
For instance , a vote could validate one ’ s sense of self-worth by illustrating that “ I care , ” “ I am patriotic , ” “ I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I am not selfish , ” etc .
Consider one of the “ 1 percent ” who is faced with a vote on whether to raise taxes on “ the rich.
” With a one-in-a-million chance of changing the electoral outcome , the expected instrumental cost of voting to raise their own taxes by $ 1 million is one dollar .
Therefore , if the value of demonstrating their generosity to themselves and/or others by voting for the proposition exceeded one dollar , such voters would benefit ( i.e.
, advance what they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ instrumental self-interest .
So , once we incorporate this expressive motive for voting , can we be sure that someone ’ s vote for a proposition that would give $ 1 million to government poverty efforts from their own pocket ( i.e.
, $ 1 million would be their share of the tax bill ) more closely matches how much they “ really want to give ” than what they actually choose to do with their own resources ?
No .
There are likely many people who would be willing to bear an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vote for giving their $ 1 million share of such a tax but who would not be willing to actually donate $ 1 million of their own money for the same end .
In other words , the cost of voting to give that $ 1 million is far lower than the cost of actually giving $ 1 million , and that artificially low price makes me willing to vote for giving far more charity than I want to give to charity .
Like any other subsidy , it makes me do too @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of demand .
As a result , can we say that how much charity I would vote for ( my share ) is a more accurate indicator of what I want to do than what I actually do with my own money ?
Since I am not convinced that the free rider effect on charity is very large but think that the massive effective subsidy inherent in expressive voting would be quite large , I think the answer is no .
Even if free riding does exist to some extent , I think @ @ @ @ @ @ @ money is a more accurate indicator than what we vote to do with it .
In fact , I find it highly plausible that such voting on charity could make people far worse off .
And that “ solution ” to the free rider problem would also make government massively larger , which is seldom an effective means of advancing our well-being .
I think this verdict accords with the Constitution , which does not mention a federal role in charity , and its widely accepted meaning earlier in American history .
As @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its signing , in vetoing federal aid to drought-stricken Texas farmers : I can find no warrant for such an appropriation in the Constitution , and I do not believe that the power and duty of the General Government ought to be extended to the relief of individual suffering which is in no manner properly related to the public service or benefit….The friendliness and charity of our countrymen can always be relied upon to relieve their fellow-citizens in misfortune….Federal aid in such cases encourages the expectation of paternal care on the part of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our national character , while it prevents the indulgence among our people of that kindly sentiment and conduct which strengthen the bond of a common brotherhood .

One need not look far for evidence that many Americans want to help the poor.
One obvious piece of that evidence is that many give substantial amounts of time, effort, and money to do so. But given that evidence, why do we need government to be so substantially involved in redistribution, backed by coercion, rather than relying on individuals and voluntary associations to provide charity?
One argument that has been made involves the free rider problem, the argument that leaving charity to voluntary efforts would result in less charity than we “really” want to contribute. In a nutshell, the problem is that my personal contribution, at most, will have virtually no effect in reducing poverty, so that even though I want to do something about it, I don’t contribute because the problem of poverty is so large relative to my resources.
This argument has led to the conclusion that we need government, and its ability to coerce people, to tax us (more than we would have voluntarily given) to force us to give “what we really want to give,” which could make the “donors” better off despite the coercion involved.
I have long thought this was an unsatisfying argument with several problems. As E.C. Pasour wrote, “The free rider concept…has also been widely misused in the case of charity.” In particular, although it is true that my potential contributions are far too small to appreciably reduce the existence of poverty, which could potentially trigger a free rider problem in reducing poverty, my potential contributions are large enough that I can do something about the poverty of a particular person or group I encounter or discover. I can make an appreciable difference to them. For such circumstances and choices, the standard free rider story for why I don’t give would not seem to apply, unless people are assumed to care about poverty but not about those poor individuals they encounter or discover, which seems a very odd combination of preferences. We can also join with others in groups, where our contributions are more impactful in particular areas (this was, in fact, one of the primary principles at a church where I was in charge of charitable giving for years).
However, that is not the biggest problem I have with the “government coercion makes us give what we really want to” argument. To the extent that the free rider problem does arise, it is true that government intervention can change how much charity is provided, but the result is not necessarily closer to what we “really” want to give than what we give voluntarily. A big reason for this is what is called expressive voting.
Say there was a (wildly optimistic) one-in-a-million chance that your vote would swing an electoral outcome to a result benefiting you by $10,000. Viewed instrumentally—solely as a means to an improved end—the expected value of that vote is one cent ($10,000 divided by 1 million). Such a small payoff cannot explain choosing to vote, much less adamant support for a particular candidate or measure. If the payoff in the same circumstance was $1 million, its instrumental value would be one dollar ($1 million divided by 1 million), which would generate virtually identical results.
However, people often also care about the expressive value of voting—what they feel their vote says about them. They might want to vote for something because it makes them feel better by, say, embellishing a noble self-characterization or “cheering” for a position they wish to be associated with. For instance, a vote could validate one’s sense of self-worth by illustrating that “I care,” “I am patriotic,” “I am not a racist,” “I am not selfish,” etc.
Consider one of the “1 percent” who is faced with a vote on whether to raise taxes on “the rich.” With a one-in-a-million chance of changing the electoral outcome, the expected instrumental cost of voting to raise their own taxes by $1 million is one dollar. Therefore, if the value of demonstrating their generosity to themselves and/or others by voting for the proposition exceeded one dollar, such voters would benefit (i.e., advance what they care about) by voting against their instrumental self-interest.
So, once we incorporate this expressive motive for voting, can we be sure that someone’s vote for a proposition that would give $1 million to government poverty efforts from their own pocket (i.e., $1 million would be their share of the tax bill) more closely matches how much they “really want to give” than what they actually choose to do with their own resources? No. There are likely many people who would be willing to bear an expected additional burden of one dollar to vote for giving their $1 million share of such a tax but who would not be willing to actually donate $1 million of their own money for the same end. In other words, the cost of voting to give that $1 million is far lower than the cost of actually giving $1 million, and that artificially low price makes me willing to vote for giving far more charity than I want to give to charity. Like any other subsidy, it makes me do too much of something due to the law of demand.
As a result, can we say that how much charity I would vote for (my share) is a more accurate indicator of what I want to do than what I actually do with my own money? Since I am not convinced that the free rider effect on charity is very large but think that the massive effective subsidy inherent in expressive voting would be quite large, I think the answer is no. Even if free riding does exist to some extent, I think that what we actually do with our money is a more accurate indicator than what we vote to do with it. In fact, I find it highly plausible that such voting on charity could make people far worse off. And that “solution” to the free rider problem would also make government massively larger, which is seldom an effective means of advancing our well-being.
I think this verdict accords with the Constitution, which does not mention a federal role in charity, and its widely accepted meaning earlier in American history. As Grover Cleveland said roughly a century after its signing, in vetoing federal aid to drought-stricken Texas farmers:
I can find no warrant for such an appropriation in the Constitution, and I do not believe that the power and duty of the General Government ought to be extended to the relief of individual suffering which is in no manner properly related to the public service or benefit….The friendliness and charity of our countrymen can always be relied upon to relieve their fellow-citizens in misfortune….Federal aid in such cases encourages the expectation of paternal care on the part of the government and weakens the sturdiness of our national character, while it prevents the indulgence among our people of that kindly sentiment and conduct which strengthen the bond of a common brotherhood.


newswars--2020-02-28--Video: Infowars Dominates CPAC With Exclusive Interviews

Infowars invaded this year ’ s CPAC and Owen Shroyer was able to sit down with some of the rising @ @ @ @ @ and brainstorm what Americans can do to make sure Trump wins 2020 and to discuss @ @ @ @ @ .
Short on time , but still want to stay informed ?
The War Room @ @ @ @ @ 3 hours of the broadcast !
Simon Molina Herrera knows about the horrors of communism @ @ @ @ @ firsthand in Venezuela .
Herrera also joined Owen in the Yippy booth at CPAC 2020 @ @ @ @ @ joins Owen in the Yippy booth at CPAC 2020 !
Owen sat down with Elijah @ @ @ @ @ , to discuss online censorship , the 2020 election and more .
Fog City Midge @ @ @ @ @ 2020 to share stories about lunatic liberals attacking them and doing strange things to their @ @ @ @ @ other liberal events .

Infowars invaded this year’s CPAC and Owen Shroyer was able to sit down with some of the rising stars of the conservative movement and brainstorm what Americans can do to make sure Trump wins 2020 and to discuss the future of U.S. politics.
Short on time, but still want to stay informed? The War Room Highlights covers clips from all 3 hours of the broadcast!
Simon Molina Herrera knows about the horrors of communism because he has seen it firsthand in Venezuela. Herrera also joined Owen in the Yippy booth at CPAC 2020!
Meme King Carpe Donktum joins Owen in the Yippy booth at CPAC 2020!
Owen sat down with Elijah Shaffer, aka Slightly Offens*ve, to discuss online censorship, the 2020 election and more.
Fog City Midge sat with Shroyer during CPAC 2020 to share stories about lunatic liberals attacking them and doing strange things to their equipment when filming protests and other liberal events.


newswars--2020-02-28--Financial Markets Continue to Plummet

Financial Markets Continue to Plummet

The decline came on the heels of the worst drop of the Dow Jones Industrial Average in history , on Thursday when it lost 1,190 points .
The Dow Jones Industrial Average plummeted 1,000 points on Friday , dropping 4 percent on the back of traders ’ fears of coronavirus spread as it affects a growing number of countries .
Meanwhile , the S & P 500 lost 3.7 percent in early morning trade , while the Nasdaq suffered a decline of 3.5 percent .
The tumble comes amid a major week-long sell-off , prompted by fears of the coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reported in the Chinese city of Wuhan in late December and has so far infected more than 83,700 people , resulting in the deaths of over 2,850 people .
Over a third of the people who have contracted the disease have since been cured , including more than 3,770 individuals over the last 24 hours .
Earlier this day , Brent oil sank below $ 50 per barrel for the first time since December 2018 .
Oil quotes continue to fall amid demand risks caused by China ’ s coronavirus .
The disease @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to fear that the disease may restrain economic growth , which will affect oil demand .
Mike Adams guest hosts The Alex Jones Show to break down the pitfalls being set for Trump amid the coronavirus outbreak .

The decline came on the heels of the worst drop of the Dow Jones Industrial Average in history, on Thursday when it lost 1,190 points.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average plummeted 1,000 points on Friday, dropping 4 percent on the back of traders’ fears of coronavirus spread as it affects a growing number of countries.
Meanwhile, the S&P 500 lost 3.7 percent in early morning trade, while the Nasdaq suffered a decline of 3.5 percent.
The tumble comes amid a major week-long sell-off, prompted by fears of the coronavirus epidemic.
The coronavirus disease was first reported in the Chinese city of Wuhan in late December and has so far infected more than 83,700 people, resulting in the deaths of over 2,850 people. Over a third of the people who have contracted the disease have since been cured, including more than 3,770 individuals over the last 24 hours.
Earlier this day, Brent oil sank below $50 per barrel for the first time since December 2018. Oil quotes continue to fall amid demand risks caused by China’s coronavirus. The disease continues to spread outside China prompting traders to fear that the disease may restrain economic growth, which will affect oil demand.
Mike Adams guest hosts The Alex Jones Show to break down the pitfalls being set for Trump amid the coronavirus outbreak.


newswars--2020-02-28--Watch: Illegals Use Makeshift Ladder to Climb Border Wall

A man filming in Tijuana captured the moment two people were using a makeshift ladder to climb a border wall along the coastline .
Footage from the Playas de Tijuana appears to show one of the men adjusting a wire ladder-like contraption that reaches the top of the steel bollard wall structure , as another man looks on .
The person filming , Washington Blade reporter Michael Lavers , later explained on Instagram that he witnessed the men use the ladder to scale the wall , entering the U.S. illegally .
I was just filming the border at Playas de @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gray sweatsuit used a makeshift ladder to scale the fence on the Mexican side .
He ran through what can be best described as a no man ’ s land between the two fences as a man on the Mexican side shouted “ hurry ” to him .
The man climbed a second fence and within a few seconds he was in the United States .
He ran to a set of Jersey barriers on the beach and hid between them .
A man who I assume is a coyote and shouted at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that moment I was not .
I looked away from the wall and saw seven other young men wearing the same gray sweatsuits sitting on a bench in a gazebo that is less than 100 feet from the wall .
I also noticed several other men in the area with headphones in their ears , as though they were watching to see whether U.S. Border Patrol agents were on the other side .
A Tijuana police car was parked next to the gazebo a few minutes after I saw the man climb over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the area but the other men in sweatsuits were gone .
All of this happened at 1:15 p.m. on a beautiful Thursday afternoon with the San Diego skyline clearly visible in the distance .
I also noticed several other men in the area with headphones in their ears , as though they were watching to see whether U.S. Border Patrol agents were on the other side .
A Tijuana police car was parked next to the gazebo a few minutes after I was the man climb over the fence .
Owen explains @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ball ” when it comes to his handling of the coronavirus in the United States .

A man filming in Tijuana captured the moment two people were using a makeshift ladder to climb a border wall along the coastline.
Footage from the Playas de Tijuana appears to show one of the men adjusting a wire ladder-like contraption that reaches the top of the steel bollard wall structure, as another man looks on.
The person filming, Washington Blade reporter Michael Lavers, later explained on Instagram that he witnessed the men use the ladder to scale the wall, entering the U.S. illegally.
From Lavers’ Instagram post:
I was just filming the border at Playas de Tijuana when a young man wearing a gray sweatsuit used a makeshift ladder to scale the fence on the Mexican side. He ran through what can be best described as a no man’s land between the two fences as a man on the Mexican side shouted “hurry” to him.
The man climbed a second fence and within a few seconds he was in the United States. He ran to a set of Jersey barriers on the beach and hid between them. A man who I assume is a coyote and shouted at me whether I was filming. At that moment I was not. I looked away from the wall and saw seven other young men wearing the same gray sweatsuits sitting on a bench in a gazebo that is less than 100 feet from the wall.
I also noticed several other men in the area with headphones in their ears, as though they were watching to see whether U.S. Border Patrol agents were on the other side. A Tijuana police car was parked next to the gazebo a few minutes after I saw the man climb over the fence. The coyotes were still in the area but the other men in sweatsuits were gone.
All of this happened at 1:15 p.m. on a beautiful Thursday afternoon with the San Diego skyline clearly visible in the distance.
I also noticed several other men in the area with headphones in their ears, as though they were watching to see whether U.S. Border Patrol agents were on the other side. A Tijuana police car was parked next to the gazebo a few minutes after I was the man climb over the fence.
Owen explains why president Trump has “dropped the ball” when it comes to his handling of the coronavirus in the United States.


newswars--2020-02-28--“Catastrophic”: Iranian Whistleblower Claims Government Hiding True Number of Coronavirus Victims

A whistleblower who works at a hospital in Iran claims that authorities are hiding the true scale of the coronavirus outbreak and that the real numbers are “ catastrophic.
” Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet highlights the case of an anonymous female employee at Shohadaye Yaftabad Hospital in Tehran who posted an audio file to Telegram in which she claimed that 17 people had already died at her hospital .
“ Now I risk my life and leave this voicemail .
What I have seen with my own eyes is that the situation is much more catastrophic than our state media says @ @ @ @ @ @ @ yesterday , 17 people died of the coronavirus , ” she said .
Officials in Iran have confirmed 388 confirmed Covid-19 cases and 34 related deaths .
However , at the time of the whistleblower ’ s warning on Monday , authorities said that just 3 people had died across the entire country .
According to the woman , the true coronavirus situation in Iran is “ catastrophic ” and 50-60 per cent of people infected are dying .
“ One reason for the high Iranian death toll may be that the number @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reports Aftonbladet .
“ In the rest of the world , two percent of those infected are estimated to have died.
” While there is no way to verify the woman ’ s claims , similar assertions have been made in China with many suggesting that the true scale of the outbreak is being significantly under-reported in order to prevent mass panic .
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever .
It is CRUCIAL that you support me .
Please sign up for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on SubscribeStar here .

A whistleblower who works at a hospital in Iran claims that authorities are hiding the true scale of the coronavirus outbreak and that the real numbers are “catastrophic.”
Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet highlights the case of an anonymous female employee at Shohadaye Yaftabad Hospital in Tehran who posted an audio file to Telegram in which she claimed that 17 people had already died at her hospital.
“Now I risk my life and leave this voicemail. What I have seen with my own eyes is that the situation is much more catastrophic than our state media says. When I worked at the hospital yesterday, 17 people died of the coronavirus,” she said.
Officials in Iran have confirmed 388 confirmed Covid-19 cases and 34 related deaths. However, at the time of the whistleblower’s warning on Monday, authorities said that just 3 people had died across the entire country.
According to the woman, the true coronavirus situation in Iran is “catastrophic” and 50-60 per cent of people infected are dying.
“One reason for the high Iranian death toll may be that the number of coronas infected is under-reported,” reports Aftonbladet. “In the rest of the world, two percent of those infected are estimated to have died.”
While there is no way to verify the woman’s claims, similar assertions have been made in China with many suggesting that the true scale of the outbreak is being significantly under-reported in order to prevent mass panic.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me.
Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.
Support my sponsor – Emergency Survival Foods – delicious dishes & a 25 year shelf life!
———————————————————————————————————————