newswars--2020-05-21--Baltimore Pastor Rips City’s Cease and Desist Order: “God tells us how to worship Him, nobody else g

Baltimore Pastor Rips City’s Cease and Desist Order: “God tells us how to worship Him, nobody else gets to do that.”

A pastor in Baltimore ripped up the city ’ s cease and desist letter mandating his church stop conducting in-person services or face a steep fine .
On Wednesday , Calvary Baptist Church pastor Stacey Shiflett preached to his congregation passionately rejecting Baltimore County ’ s orders , prior to tearing up the city ’ s letter .
“ News flash : Pharoah doesn ’ t get to dictate to God ’ s people how they worship their God , ” Shiflett told church members .
“ God ’ s the one that defines the parameters.
” Pastor Shiflett went @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should be holding more services , not less .
“ With this cease-and-desist letter in my hand , the Bible says to the New Testament church ‘ not forsaking the assembling of yourselves together as the manner of some is , but so much more as you see the day approaching , ’ and the closer we get to Jesus coming back , the more church we ought to be having , not less church.
” “ Now that ’ s God ’ s parameters , ” he added .
“ So I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ right here , and I ’ m telling you right now , we ’ re gon na do it God ’ s way !
God tells us how to worship Him , nobody else gets to do that.
” Speaking to Fox News , Shiflett said he ’ s committed to preserving the First Amendment right to freedom of religion .
“ Either we have liberty to worship or we have permission to worship , ” Shiflett told Fox News about his decision .
“ It has become abundantly clear that if we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have liberty again.
” 21 years as a Health Care Worker , RN Josiah Dan gives a great speech about what he is seeing on the front lines of the Covid Plandemic .

A pastor in Baltimore ripped up the city’s cease and desist letter mandating his church stop conducting in-person services or face a steep fine.
On Wednesday, Calvary Baptist Church pastor Stacey Shiflett preached to his congregation passionately rejecting Baltimore County’s orders, prior to tearing up the city’s letter.
“News flash: Pharoah doesn’t get to dictate to God’s people how they worship their God,” Shiflett told church members. “God’s the one that defines the parameters.”
Pastor Shiflett went on to remark churches during this time should be holding more services, not less.
“With this cease-and-desist letter in my hand, the Bible says to the New Testament church ‘not forsaking the assembling of yourselves together as the manner of some is, but so much more as you see the day approaching,’ and the closer we get to Jesus coming back, the more church we ought to be having, not less church.”
“Now that’s God’s parameters,” he added. “So I’m tearing up this cease-and-desist order right here, and I’m telling you right now, we’re gonna do it God’s way! God tells us how to worship Him, nobody else gets to do that.”
Speaking to Fox News, Shiflett said he’s committed to preserving the First Amendment right to freedom of religion.
“Either we have liberty to worship or we have permission to worship,” Shiflett told Fox News about his decision. “It has become abundantly clear that if we settle for permission, we will never have liberty again.”
21 years as a Health Care Worker, RN Josiah Dan gives a great speech about what he is seeing on the front lines of the Covid Plandemic.


newswars--2020-05-21--Air Force Opens Competition to Design ‘Skyborg’ Loyal Wingman Drone

Competition has been opened up by the US Air Force for contractors to design a “ loyal wingman ” drone governed by the “ Skyborg ” artificial intelligence system .
The program hopes to yield an autonomous aircraft to accompany pilots on missions .
Announcement of the new contract solicitation was posted on the US government ’ s beta.sam.gov website on May 15 , notifying defense contractors of the opportunity to field their proposals for the new autonomous drone .
The winners will “ conduct research to develop , demonstrate , integrate and transition air vehicle , payload and autonomy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , revolutionary capabilities to the warfighter through the Skyborg program , ” according to the documents .
The notice describes the terrifyingly named Skyborg system as “ a transferable suite of autonomous capabilities paired with teamed , autonomous , low-cost platforms to enable expeditionary operations that can generate massed combat power with minimal logistical footprints ; delivering a future Air Force which can deter , blunt and defeat peer adversaries.
” “ The intent of Skyborg is to integrate an autonomy mission system core and suite of services ( developed under a separate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ program ) with multiple low-cost air vehicle systems , each designed to perform one or more mission types , ” the Air Force notes .
In other words , the drone will carry weapons into combat alongside piloted aircraft , and while it ’ s capable of firing them offensively , its being a drone means it could also be used as a shield for the human pilot by attracting fire to itself or even playing “ bodyguard ” against an incoming missile or gunfire .
The Air Force was previously testing a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Valkyrie , built by Kratos Defense & Security Solutions but bearing a superficial similarity to Lockheed Martin ’ s F-22 and F-35 stealth aircraft – not in the least because it sported a similar low-visibility technology .
However , the Valkyrie was seen as just one potential platform for the Skyborg AI .
Air Force Magazine reported last week that Kratos as well as Boeing , General Atomics and Lockheed Martin would each be submitting their own proposals .
The Air Force has said it hopes to field the Skyborg system by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what is on the horizon with COVID-19 , the lockdown , the vaccine , and how Big Tech wants to run your life .

Competition has been opened up by the US Air Force for contractors to design a “loyal wingman” drone governed by the “Skyborg” artificial intelligence system.
The program hopes to yield an autonomous aircraft to accompany pilots on missions.
Announcement of the new contract solicitation was posted on the US government’s beta.sam.gov website on May 15, notifying defense contractors of the opportunity to field their proposals for the new autonomous drone.
The winners will “conduct research to develop, demonstrate, integrate and transition air vehicle, payload and autonomy technologies and systems that will provide affordable, revolutionary capabilities to the warfighter through the Skyborg program,” according to the documents.
The notice describes the terrifyingly named Skyborg system as “a transferable suite of autonomous capabilities paired with teamed, autonomous, low-cost platforms to enable expeditionary operations that can generate massed combat power with minimal logistical footprints; delivering a future Air Force which can deter, blunt and defeat peer adversaries.”
“The intent of Skyborg is to integrate an autonomy mission system core and suite of services (developed under a separate Skyborg System Design Agent (SDA) program) with multiple low-cost air vehicle systems, each designed to perform one or more mission types,” the Air Force notes.
In other words, the drone will carry weapons into combat alongside piloted aircraft, and while it’s capable of firing them offensively, its being a drone means it could also be used as a shield for the human pilot by attracting fire to itself or even playing “bodyguard” against an incoming missile or gunfire.
The Air Force was previously testing a loyal wingman drone concept in the XQ-58 Valkyrie, built by Kratos Defense & Security Solutions but bearing a superficial similarity to Lockheed Martin’s F-22 and F-35 stealth aircraft – not in the least because it sported a similar low-visibility technology. However, the Valkyrie was seen as just one potential platform for the Skyborg AI. Air Force Magazine reported last week that Kratos as well as Boeing, General Atomics and Lockheed Martin would each be submitting their own proposals.
The Air Force has said it hopes to field the Skyborg system by the end of 2023.
Alex Jones covers what is on the horizon with COVID-19, the lockdown, the vaccine, and how Big Tech wants to run your life.


newswars--2020-05-21--VIDEO: Healthcare Worker Repeatedly Punches Elderly Patients in Sickening Footage

The original video , and a few adjunct bits of footage containing the same man pummeling his vulnerable patients , elicited abundant anger as social media users voiced their disgust at the cowardly act .
In the first video , the prone elderly man attempts to defend himself as the stronger , younger caretaker lays into him with blows to the head .
The man throws multiple punches at the cowering elderly man until he draws blood .
He then grabs a bed sheet to wipe the blood , while muttering unintelligibly to the battered elderly man .
The clips @ @ @ @ @ @ @ alleged identification of the man in question being made .
The man , who was identified by Twitter users , reportedly worked for an elderly care home facility in Michigan .
The original poster of the sickening videos alerted the authorities of the man ’ s actions , forwarding the alarming footage .
Another social media user took a screenshot of the videos and forwarded them to the man ’ s alleged employer .
In the second video , he strikes the scrawny , emaciated elderly patient on the bed as they appear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , with his face mask lowered toward his chin , as he dishes out several blows to another defenseless patient .
Many of the comments took aim at Gov .
Whitmer , suspecting that the Michigan representative would not bat an eye at the horrible abandonment of duty from the caretaker .
Others tagged various news sources and anchors in an effort to further publicize the awful acts taking place to defenseless elderly people .
The original tweet had garnered over 1,200 retweets at this present time .
Health care workers have been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ during the coronavirus pandemic , with a seemingly endless series of TikTok videos showing nurses dancing , making some wonder whether some workers are as slammed by coronavirus patients as news coverage would have them believe .
Alex Jones covers what is on the horizon with COVID-19 , the lockdown , the vaccine , and how Big Tech wants to run your life .

A viral video has circulated social media showing a healthcare worker boxing his elderly patients.
The original video, and a few adjunct bits of footage containing the same man pummeling his vulnerable patients, elicited abundant anger as social media users voiced their disgust at the cowardly act.
In the first video, the prone elderly man attempts to defend himself as the stronger, younger caretaker lays into him with blows to the head.
The man throws multiple punches at the cowering elderly man until he draws blood. He then grabs a bed sheet to wipe the blood, while muttering unintelligibly to the battered elderly man.
The clips were posted to Twitter, with an alleged identification of the man in question being made.
i have been sending this to every news anchor i can think of … do your part and help me so we can fckin help him … godfuickindamnit this makes me mad pic.twitter.com/SuJD69IABV — 🏴☠user(“/n/3/f/”).adm1n=255()🏴☠ (@nulluser10) May 21, 2020
The man, who was identified by Twitter users, reportedly worked for an elderly care home facility in Michigan.
The original poster of the sickening videos alerted the authorities of the man’s actions, forwarding the alarming footage.
Another social media user took a screenshot of the videos and forwarded them to the man’s alleged employer.
→[2nd Vid of Jadon Hayden Beating Elderly Video Link: https://t.co/8GOm0HAPeh] Download if needed to send to the authorities.. Michigan’s DHS’s Adult Protective Services. 24Hr. Hotline: 855-444-3911 (He works at Saints Incorporated Disability Group Home: https://t.co/qgPqY7lq4e) pic.twitter.com/XA7OomSYl0 — Sum Ting Wong (@realsumtingwong) May 21, 2020
In the second video, he strikes the scrawny, emaciated elderly patient on the bed as they appear to sleep.
The perpetrator breathes heavily, with his face mask lowered toward his chin, as he dishes out several blows to another defenseless patient.
***5/21/20 Update: I sent the email to MI’s DHS Adult Protective Services with all the links and attachments they need to arrest him. →And tonight God sent YOU as His Angels to protect the Veteran. To God be the glory! Keep fighting the good fight soldiers! #WWG1WGA pic.twitter.com/rE62gnxavR — Sum Ting Wong (@realsumtingwong) May 21, 2020
Many of the comments took aim at Gov. Whitmer, suspecting that the Michigan representative would not bat an eye at the horrible abandonment of duty from the caretaker.
Others tagged various news sources and anchors in an effort to further publicize the awful acts taking place to defenseless elderly people.
The original tweet had garnered over 1,200 retweets at this present time.
Health care workers have been receiving large amounts of praise and criticism during the coronavirus pandemic, with a seemingly endless series of TikTok videos showing nurses dancing, making some wonder whether some workers are as slammed by coronavirus patients as news coverage would have them believe.
Alex Jones covers what is on the horizon with COVID-19, the lockdown, the vaccine, and how Big Tech wants to run your life.


newswars--2020-05-21--A Little Physical Activity Pays Big Dividends to High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients

Results of a comprehensive analysis of exercise and its protective role for high-risk breast cancer patients show that women who exercise not only live longer , but also are more likely to remain cancer-free after their treatment .
What ’ s more , the study suggests that even a modest amount of exercise can be beneficial .
“ Aiming for as little as two and half hours a week of exercise – the minimum under federal guidelines – can have a big impact for women with high-risk breast cancer , ” said study lead Rikki Cannioto , PhD , EdD @ @ @ @ @ @ @ physical activity is far better , in terms of cancer survival , than no activity at all and it is just as beneficial as longer workouts.
” Cannioto ’ s study was part of a clinical trial run by SWOG Cancer Research Network , a cancer clinical trials network funded by the National Cancer Institute ( NCI ) , part of the National Institutes of Health ( NIH ) , and a member of the oldest and largest publicly-funded research network in the nation .
Study results are published in the Journal of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the most recent edition of the NCI ’ s Cancer Currents blog .
Research has long shown a positive correlation between exercise and cancer survival .
People who exercise more- before or after cancer treatment – appear to live longer .
What makes the SWOG study unique is that it also showed , among the high-risk breast cancer patients it studied , those who exercised had a lower chance of their breast cancer returning after treatment .
Another new twist is the time scale of the study .
Patients were not only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cancer treatment – but during chemotherapy , too .
Cannioto , an assistant professor of oncology in the Department of Cancer Prevention and Control at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center , wanted to determine the impact of the amount of exercise , and its timing , on women with breast cancers that are high-risk , or likely to return .
She addressed this question in the context of the Diet , Exercise , Lifestyle and Cancer Prognosis Study ( DELCaP ) , led by Christine Ambrosone , PhD , from Roswell Park and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was part of S0221 , a randomized phase III SWOG trial determining the best dose and schedule for three chemotherapy drugs .
S0221 included patients with stage II or III breast cancer , or high-risk stage I cancer , all of which have a higher rate of returning because , among other features , the primary tumor was large or the cancer had spread to the lymph nodes .
S0221 enrolled 2,716 patients – and 1,607 consented to responding to the DELCaP questionnaire .
It included questions about study subjects ’ habits , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ current habits , as well as routines prior to their breast cancer diagnosis .
The questionnaire was administered when patients enrolled in the study , when they were undergoing chemotherapy , one year after their study treatment , and again two years after treatment , for a total of four responses .
More than 80 percent responded in each round .
For exercise , patients were asked what type of physical activity they did , for how long , and how often .
Responses were categorized based on the U.S. Department of Health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for Americans , which call for at least two and half hours of moderate-intensity activity a week or one and a quarter hours of vigorous activity per week .
Cannioto and her team then looked at post-treatment outcomes for different groups .
• Patients who met the minimum federal exercise guidelines , before and after treatment , had a significantly reduced risk of their cancer returning – a 55 percent decrease in risk .
• Patients who met the minimum federal exercise guidelines , before and after treatment , had a significantly reduced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decrease in risk .
• Patients who started exercising only after treatment still saw big benefits – a 46 percent decreased chance of recurrence and a 43 percent decreased chance of dying .
• A few hours of consistent , weekly exercise result in the same survival benefits as longer periods of weekly activity .
“ What these results suggest for doctors – and patients – is that even a modest exercise routine , taken up after cancer treatment , can help women with high-risk breast cancer live longer and healthier lives , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s never too late to start walking , doing yoga , cycling , or swimming – and that activity certainly appears to pay off.
” Alex Jones covers what is on the horizon with COVID-19 , the lockdown , the vaccine , and how Big Tech wants to run your life .

Results of a comprehensive analysis of exercise and its protective role for high-risk breast cancer patients show that women who exercise not only live longer, but also are more likely to remain cancer-free after their treatment. What’s more, the study suggests that even a modest amount of exercise can be beneficial.
“Aiming for as little as two and half hours a week of exercise – the minimum under federal guidelines – can have a big impact for women with high-risk breast cancer,” said study lead Rikki Cannioto, PhD, EdD. “Our research shows that some physical activity is far better, in terms of cancer survival, than no activity at all and it is just as beneficial as longer workouts.”
Cannioto’s study was part of a clinical trial run by SWOG Cancer Research Network, a cancer clinical trials network funded by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and a member of the oldest and largest publicly-funded research network in the nation. Study results are published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, and featured in the most recent edition of the NCI’s Cancer Currents blog.
Research has long shown a positive correlation between exercise and cancer survival. People who exercise more- before or after cancer treatment – appear to live longer. What makes the SWOG study unique is that it also showed, among the high-risk breast cancer patients it studied, those who exercised had a lower chance of their breast cancer returning after treatment. Another new twist is the time scale of the study. Patients were not only asked about their exercise before and after cancer treatment – but during chemotherapy, too.
Cannioto, an assistant professor of oncology in the Department of Cancer Prevention and Control at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, wanted to determine the impact of the amount of exercise, and its timing, on women with breast cancers that are high-risk, or likely to return. She addressed this question in the context of the Diet, Exercise, Lifestyle and Cancer Prognosis Study (DELCaP), led by Christine Ambrosone, PhD, from Roswell Park and her SWOG collaborators. The DELCaP study was part of S0221, a randomized phase III SWOG trial determining the best dose and schedule for three chemotherapy drugs. S0221 included patients with stage II or III breast cancer, or high-risk stage I cancer, all of which have a higher rate of returning because, among other features, the primary tumor was large or the cancer had spread to the lymph nodes. S0221 enrolled 2,716 patients – and 1,607 consented to responding to the DELCaP questionnaire. It included questions about study subjects’ habits, including exercise. They were asked about current habits, as well as routines prior to their breast cancer diagnosis. The questionnaire was administered when patients enrolled in the study, when they were undergoing chemotherapy, one year after their study treatment, and again two years after treatment, for a total of four responses. More than 80 percent responded in each round.
For exercise, patients were asked what type of physical activity they did, for how long, and how often. Responses were categorized based on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, which call for at least two and half hours of moderate-intensity activity a week or one and a quarter hours of vigorous activity per week. Cannioto and her team then looked at post-treatment outcomes for different groups.
Here’s what they found:
Patients who met the minimum federal exercise guidelines, before and after treatment, had a significantly reduced risk of their cancer returning – a 55 percent decrease in risk.
Patients who met the minimum federal exercise guidelines, before and after treatment, had a significantly reduced risk of death – a 68 percent decrease in risk.
Patients who started exercising only after treatment still saw big benefits – a 46 percent decreased chance of recurrence and a 43 percent decreased chance of dying.
A few hours of consistent, weekly exercise result in the same survival benefits as longer periods of weekly activity.
“What these results suggest for doctors – and patients – is that even a modest exercise routine, taken up after cancer treatment, can help women with high-risk breast cancer live longer and healthier lives,” Cannioto said. “It’s never too late to start walking, doing yoga, cycling, or swimming – and that activity certainly appears to pay off.”
Alex Jones covers what is on the horizon with COVID-19, the lockdown, the vaccine, and how Big Tech wants to run your life.


newswars--2020-05-21--Study: Adding Spice to a Meal Lowers Inflammation

Adding an array of spices to your meal is a surefire way to make it more tasty , but new Penn State research suggests it may increase its health benefits , as well .
In a randomized , controlled feeding study , the researchers found that when participants ate a meal high in fat and carbohydrates with six grams of a spice blend added , the participants had lower inflammation markers compared to when they ate a meal with less or no spices .
“ If spices are palatable to you , they might be a way to make a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” said Connie Rogers , associate professor of nutritional sciences .
“ We can ’ t say from this study if it was one spice in particular , but this specific blend seemed to be beneficial.
” The researchers used a blend of basil , bay leaf , black pepper , cinnamon , coriander , cumin , ginger , oregano , parsley , red pepper , rosemary , thyme and turmeric for the study , which was recently published in the Journal of Nutrition .
According to Rogers , previous research has linked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ginger and tumeric , with anti-inflammatory properties .
Additionally , chronic inflammation has previously been associated with poor health outcomes like cancer , cardiovascular disease , and overweight and obesity , which affects approximately 72 percent of the U.S. population .
In more recent years , researchers have found that inflammation can spike after a person eats a meal high in fat or sugar .
While it is not clear whether these short bursts — called acute inflammation — can cause chronic inflammation , Rogers said it ’ s suspected they play a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or obesity .
“ Ultimately the gold standard would be to get people eating more healthfully and to lose weight and exercise , but those behavioral changes are difficult and take time , ” Rogers said .
“ So in the interim , we wanted to explore whether a combination of spices that people are already familiar with and could fit in a single meal could have a positive effect.
” For the study , the researchers recruited 12 men between the ages of 40 and 65 , with overweight or obesity , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cardiovascular disease .
Rogers said the sample was chosen because people in these demographics tend to be at a higher risk for developing poorer health outcomes .
In random order , each participant ate three versions of a meal high in saturated fat and carbohydrates on three separate days : one with no spices , one with two grams of the spice blend , and one with six grams of the spice blend .
The researchers drew blood samples before and then after each meal hourly for four hours to measure inflammatory markers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ white blood cells and stimulated them to get the cells to respond to an inflammatory stimulus , similar to what would happen while your body is fighting an infection , ” Rogers said .
“ We think that ’ s important because it ’ s representative of what would happen in the body .
Cells would encounter a pathogen and produce inflammatory cytokines.
” After analyzing the data , the researchers found that inflammatory cytokines were reduced following the meal containing six grams of spices compared to the meal containing two grams of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ six grams roughly translates to between one teaspoon to one tablespoon , depending on how the spices are dehydrated .
While the researchers can ’ t be sure which spice or spices are contributing to the effect , or the precise mechanism in which the effect is created , Rogers said the results suggest that the spices have anti-inflammatory properties that help offset inflammation caused by the high-carb and high-fat meal .
Additionally , Rogers said that a second study using the same subjects , conducted by Penn State researchers Penny Kris-Etherton and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of spices resulted in a smaller post-meal reduction of “ flow mediated dilation ” in the blood vessels — a measure of blood vessel flexibility and marker of blood vessel health .
In the future , Rogers said she , Kris-Etherton and Petersen will be working on further studies to determine the affects of spices in the diet across longer periods of time and within a more diverse population .
Alex Jones covers what is on the horizon with COVID-19 , the lockdown , the vaccine , and how Big Tech wants to @ @ @ @

Adding an array of spices to your meal is a surefire way to make it more tasty, but new Penn State research suggests it may increase its health benefits, as well.
In a randomized, controlled feeding study, the researchers found that when participants ate a meal high in fat and carbohydrates with six grams of a spice blend added, the participants had lower inflammation markers compared to when they ate a meal with less or no spices.
“If spices are palatable to you, they might be a way to make a high-fat or high-carb meal more healthful,” said Connie Rogers, associate professor of nutritional sciences. “We can’t say from this study if it was one spice in particular, but this specific blend seemed to be beneficial.”
The researchers used a blend of basil, bay leaf, black pepper, cinnamon, coriander, cumin, ginger, oregano, parsley, red pepper, rosemary, thyme and turmeric for the study, which was recently published in the Journal of Nutrition.
According to Rogers, previous research has linked a variety of different spices, like ginger and tumeric, with anti-inflammatory properties. Additionally, chronic inflammation has previously been associated with poor health outcomes like cancer, cardiovascular disease, and overweight and obesity, which affects approximately 72 percent of the U.S. population.
In more recent years, researchers have found that inflammation can spike after a person eats a meal high in fat or sugar. While it is not clear whether these short bursts — called acute inflammation — can cause chronic inflammation, Rogers said it’s suspected they play a factor, especially in people with overweight or obesity.
“Ultimately the gold standard would be to get people eating more healthfully and to lose weight and exercise, but those behavioral changes are difficult and take time,” Rogers said. “So in the interim, we wanted to explore whether a combination of spices that people are already familiar with and could fit in a single meal could have a positive effect.”
For the study, the researchers recruited 12 men between the ages of 40 and 65, with overweight or obesity, and at least one risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Rogers said the sample was chosen because people in these demographics tend to be at a higher risk for developing poorer health outcomes.
In random order, each participant ate three versions of a meal high in saturated fat and carbohydrates on three separate days: one with no spices, one with two grams of the spice blend, and one with six grams of the spice blend. The researchers drew blood samples before and then after each meal hourly for four hours to measure inflammatory markers.
“Additionally, we cultured the white blood cells and stimulated them to get the cells to respond to an inflammatory stimulus, similar to what would happen while your body is fighting an infection,” Rogers said. “We think that’s important because it’s representative of what would happen in the body. Cells would encounter a pathogen and produce inflammatory cytokines.”
After analyzing the data, the researchers found that inflammatory cytokines were reduced following the meal containing six grams of spices compared to the meal containing two grams of spices or no spices. Rogers said six grams roughly translates to between one teaspoon to one tablespoon, depending on how the spices are dehydrated.
While the researchers can’t be sure which spice or spices are contributing to the effect, or the precise mechanism in which the effect is created, Rogers said the results suggest that the spices have anti-inflammatory properties that help offset inflammation caused by the high-carb and high-fat meal.
Additionally, Rogers said that a second study using the same subjects, conducted by Penn State researchers Penny Kris-Etherton and Kristina Petersen, found that six grams of spices resulted in a smaller post-meal reduction of “flow mediated dilation” in the blood vessels — a measure of blood vessel flexibility and marker of blood vessel health.
In the future, Rogers said she, Kris-Etherton and Petersen will be working on further studies to determine the affects of spices in the diet across longer periods of time and within a more diverse population.
Alex Jones covers what is on the horizon with COVID-19, the lockdown, the vaccine, and how Big Tech wants to run your life.


newswars--2020-05-21--Left-Wing Columnist: “I Would Vote for Joe Biden if he Boiled Babies and Ate Them”

Left-wing columnist Katha Pollitt has penned an article for The Nation in which she states she would vote for Joe Biden even “ if he boiled babies and ate them.
” In the article , Pollitt dispenses with the “ believe women ” mantra to cast doubt on Tara Reade ’ s sexual assault allegation against Biden before declaring , “ I would vote for Joe Biden if he boiled babies and ate them .
He wasn ’ t my candidate , but taking back the White House is that important.
” After questioning the veracity of Reade ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a wall in a hallway in the Capitol complex and forcibly penetrated her with his fingers , Pollitt made clear that it didn ’ t matter if Biden had sexually assaulted her or not .
“ Whether or not you believe Tara Reade … you should vote for Joe Biden if he is the nominee .
… We do not have the luxury of sitting out the election to feel morally pure or send a message about sexual assault and # BelieveWomen .
That will not help women at all .
Or anyone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s remarks once again underscore how leftists will jettison their much vaunted righteousness when it comes to the # MeToo movement if it threatens to get in the way of them obtaining power .
One of the best responses to Pollitt came from The Hill Rising co-host Krystal Ball , who tweeted , “ Democrats used to have contempt for what they viewed as stupid MAGA cultists who would vote for Trump even if he shot someone on 5th ave. Now they have become what they hated.
” My voice is being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who want me disappeared forever .
It is CRUCIAL that you support me .
Please sign up for the free newsletter here .
Donate to me on SubscribeStar here .
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown .

Left-wing columnist Katha Pollitt has penned an article for The Nation in which she states she would vote for Joe Biden even “if he boiled babies and ate them.”
In the article, Pollitt dispenses with the “believe women” mantra to cast doubt on Tara Reade’s sexual assault allegation against Biden before declaring, “I would vote for Joe Biden if he boiled babies and ate them. He wasn’t my candidate, but taking back the White House is that important.”
After questioning the veracity of Reade’s claim that Biden pushed her up against a wall in a hallway in the Capitol complex and forcibly penetrated her with his fingers, Pollitt made clear that it didn’t matter if Biden had sexually assaulted her or not.
“Whether or not you believe Tara Reade … you should vote for Joe Biden if he is the nominee. … We do not have the luxury of sitting out the election to feel morally pure or send a message about sexual assault and #BelieveWomen. That will not help women at all. Or anyone else,” she asserted.
Pollitt’s remarks once again underscore how leftists will jettison their much vaunted righteousness when it comes to the #MeToo movement if it threatens to get in the way of them obtaining power.
One of the best responses to Pollitt came from The Hill Rising co-host Krystal Ball, who tweeted, “Democrats used to have contempt for what they viewed as stupid MAGA cultists who would vote for Trump even if he shot someone on 5th ave. Now they have become what they hated.”
Democrats used to have contempt for what they viewed as stupid MAGA cultists who would vote for Trump even if he shot someone on 5th ave. Now they have become what they hated. — Krystal Ball (@krystalball) May 21, 2020
H/T: Charlie Nash.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me.
Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-05-21--Democrats Go Full Tyranny and Demand President Trump Wear a Mask! Watch Live

Also catch the streams at infowars.com/show and Banned.video .
Tune into the most banned broadcast in the world !
President @ @ @ @ @ save America from collapse !
Tune in : Tune in here for tomorrow ’ s @ @ @ @ @ s Thursday , and on this edition of The David Knight Show we ’ ll @ @ @ @ @ Operation Warp Speed vaccination plan , the dying U.S. economy , the 2020 election and @ @ @ @ @ 66 of the lockdown of America , your host David Knight is set to provide @ @ @ @ @ ’ s top news items .

Owen Shroyer hosts this LIVE edition of War Room, weekdays 3-6 p.m. CT.
Also catch the streams at infowars.com/show and Banned.video.
Alex Jones Show: Trump Fights to Keep America Open Amid Globalist Power Grab
Tune into the most banned broadcast in the world!
President Trump is working overtime to save America from collapse! Tune in:
David Knight Show: Lockdown Day 66 & Operation Warp Speed’s Government Pricks
Tune in here for tomorrow’s news today!
It’s Thursday, and on this edition of The David Knight Show we’ll discuss the government’s Operation Warp Speed vaccination plan, the dying U.S. economy, the 2020 election and much more.
On day 66 of the lockdown of America, your host David Knight is set to provide a unique take on today’s top news items.


newswars--2020-05-21--New York State Concedes That Churches Can Hold Drive-In Worship Services

In a victory for common sense and the rights of churches to safely exercise their constitutional rights in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic , New York State has conceded that churches may hold drive-in worship services .
The announcement by Gov .
Andrew Cuomo came five days after The Rutherford Institute came to the defense of a small church in Massena , NY , that was allegedly threatened with prosecution and $ 1000 fines for holding drive-in worship services that adhere to social distancing guidelines .
“ While federal and state governments have adopted specific restrictive measures in an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID-19 virus , the current public health situation has not resulted in the suspension of fundamental constitutional rights such as religious freedom , freedom of speech and the right of assembly , ” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead , president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America : The War on the American People .
“ While there is a moral responsibility to not endanger other lives with our actions , that does not mean relinquishing all of our freedoms .
Be responsible , but don ’ t allow yourselves @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be undermined.
” After Governor Cuomo issued his New York State on PAUSE executive order in March 2020 , which imposed a ban on all gatherings and limited activities not considered essential , Pastor Samson Ryman explored options for holding worship services for Central Bible Baptist Church in accordance with safety protocols .
Initially , the pastor proposed holding outdoor , open-air services for the 40-member church , which is located in upstate New York , but was told by the Massena Police Department that this was not allowed under the governor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ then formulated a plan to hold drive-in services in which attendees would drive to Central Bible Baptist Church , park in the parking lot on the east side of the church , and remain in their vehicles and with their windows up at all times .
The pastor planned to conduct the service from a porch attached to the Church and adjacent to the parking lot , using a low-power FM transmitter that attendees could tune into with a radio .
At all times during the worship service , Pastor Ryman would remain @ @ @ @ @ @ @ attendees .
On May 3 , the Church held a drive-in service that was attended by about 23 persons in about 18 vehicles .
The following day , police issued an informal cease-and-desist order to Pastor Ryman , warning him that he would be subject to prosecution for holding any further drive-in services and could face a fine of up to $ 1000 .
In coming to the defense of Pastor Ryman and Central Bible Baptist Church , The Rutherford Institute informed the police department that its ban on drive-in worship services are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and a misapplication of the Governor ’ s Executive Orders , which severely chills the Church ’ s exercise of the fundamental right to practice their religion .
Rutherford Institute attorneys also pointed out that such a ban is an overbroad restriction on First Amendment rights as long as similar activities are allowed .
For example , the state ’ s restrictions allow for gathering in convenience stores , beverage stores , hardware stores , and drive-thru restaurant lines .
Five days after the Institute issued its demand letter , Gov .
Cuomo @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
He also eased restrictions on religious gatherings , limiting services to 10 attendees and requiring that social distancing protocols be observed .
Alex Jones covers what is on the horizon with COVID-19 , the lockdown , the vaccine , and how Big Tech wants to run your life .

In a victory for common sense and the rights of churches to safely exercise their constitutional rights in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, New York State has conceded that churches may hold drive-in worship services.
The announcement by Gov. Andrew Cuomo came five days after The Rutherford Institute came to the defense of a small church in Massena, NY, that was allegedly threatened with prosecution and $1000 fines for holding drive-in worship services that adhere to social distancing guidelines.
“While federal and state governments have adopted specific restrictive measures in an effort to decelerate the spread of the COVID-19 virus, the current public health situation has not resulted in the suspension of fundamental constitutional rights such as religious freedom, freedom of speech and the right of assembly,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People. “While there is a moral responsibility to not endanger other lives with our actions, that does not mean relinquishing all of our freedoms. Be responsible, but don’t allow yourselves to be muzzled or your individual freedoms to be undermined.”
After Governor Cuomo issued his New York State on PAUSE executive order in March 2020, which imposed a ban on all gatherings and limited activities not considered essential, Pastor Samson Ryman explored options for holding worship services for Central Bible Baptist Church in accordance with safety protocols.
Initially, the pastor proposed holding outdoor, open-air services for the 40-member church, which is located in upstate New York, but was told by the Massena Police Department that this was not allowed under the governor’s COVID-19 orders.
Pastor Ryman then formulated a plan to hold drive-in services in which attendees would drive to Central Bible Baptist Church, park in the parking lot on the east side of the church, and remain in their vehicles and with their windows up at all times.
The pastor planned to conduct the service from a porch attached to the Church and adjacent to the parking lot, using a low-power FM transmitter that attendees could tune into with a radio. At all times during the worship service, Pastor Ryman would remain well over six feet from other church attendees.
On May 3, the Church held a drive-in service that was attended by about 23 persons in about 18 vehicles.
The following day, police issued an informal cease-and-desist order to Pastor Ryman, warning him that he would be subject to prosecution for holding any further drive-in services and could face a fine of up to $1000.
In coming to the defense of Pastor Ryman and Central Bible Baptist Church, The Rutherford Institute informed the police department that its ban on drive-in worship services are grounded in a misunderstanding of the law and a misapplication of the Governor’s Executive Orders, which severely chills the Church’s exercise of the fundamental right to practice their religion.
Rutherford Institute attorneys also pointed out that such a ban is an overbroad restriction on First Amendment rights as long as similar activities are allowed. For example, the state’s restrictions allow for gathering in convenience stores, beverage stores, hardware stores, and drive-thru restaurant lines.
Five days after the Institute issued its demand letter, Gov. Cuomo announced that churches may hold drive-in services.
He also eased restrictions on religious gatherings, limiting services to 10 attendees and requiring that social distancing protocols be observed.
Alex Jones covers what is on the horizon with COVID-19, the lockdown, the vaccine, and how Big Tech wants to run your life.


newswars--2020-05-21--Trump Says He’ll Attend SpaceX Launch, Tells Media, “I’d like to put you in the rocket and get rid o

Trump Says He’ll Attend SpaceX Launch, Tells Media, “I’d like to put you in the rocket and get rid of you for a while.”

President Trump made the fake news media the butt of a joke Thursday , jesting he ’ d like to launch them into outer space using Elon Musk ’ s rocket ship .
During a press briefing on the White House lawn , the president revealed he ’ ll be attending the highly-anticipated SpaceX mission next Wednesday that seeks to launch its first humans into orbit – but he added an extra quip at the media ’ s expense .
“ I ’ m thinking about going that ’ ll be next week to the rocket launch .
I hope @ @ @ @ @ @ @ me , ” Trump said .
“ I ’ d like to put you in the rocket and get rid of you for a while !
” he joshed .
Here ’ s more on SpaceX ’ s Falcon 9 rocket launch from Space.com : Demo-2 will carry NASA astronauts Doug Hurley and Bob Behnken to and from the International Space Station ( ISS ) .
The May 27 liftoff atop a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket will be the first orbital human spaceflight to launch from U.S. soil since NASA ’ s space @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Since then , NASA has relied solely on Russia ’ s Soyuz spacecraft to perform this taxi service .
Alex Jones breaks down the posthuman agenda of the globalists and how Elon Musk came out in support of antiglobalist movements .

President Trump made the fake news media the butt of a joke Thursday, jesting he’d like to launch them into outer space using Elon Musk’s rocket ship.
During a press briefing on the White House lawn, the president revealed he’ll be attending the highly-anticipated SpaceX mission next Wednesday that seeks to launch its first humans into orbit – but he added an extra quip at the media’s expense.
President Trump tells media he’s thinking about going to the SpaceX rocket launch next week: “I hope you’re all gonna join me. I’d like to put you in the rocket and get rid of you for a while.” pic.twitter.com/rvTK2yZnKh — Breaking911 (@Breaking911) May 21, 2020 Look sharp by wearing exclusive gear found only at our store.
“I’m thinking about going that’ll be next week to the rocket launch. I hope you’re all gonna join me,” Trump said.
“I’d like to put you in the rocket and get rid of you for a while!” he joshed.
Here’s more on SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket launch from Space.com:
Demo-2 will carry NASA astronauts Doug Hurley and Bob Behnken to and from the International Space Station (ISS). The May 27 liftoff atop a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket will be the first orbital human spaceflight to launch from U.S. soil since NASA’s space shuttle fleet retired in July 2011. Since then, NASA has relied solely on Russia’s Soyuz spacecraft to perform this taxi service.
Alex Jones breaks down the posthuman agenda of the globalists and how Elon Musk came out in support of antiglobalist movements.


newswars--2020-05-21--Why An Economy Can’t Work Without Market Prices

It has been a full century since Mises dropped the economic calculation bomb , but the argument apparently still haunts socialists .
It should , since Mises managed to show that a socialist economy is not an economy at all but calculational chaos .
Yet it is curious that it does , since most have ( incorrectly ) concluded that Mises ’ s argument , after decades of debate , was debunked .
Why does a presumably debunked argument still , drive even non-Austrian critics to pen new responses and deliberate on apparent flaws ?
Part of the answer might @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proper conclusion .
Mises ’ s critics , specifically the “ market socialists ” of the 1930s , misconstrued his argument as being about the existence , rather than meaning , of prices .
Their answer , as simple as it was unsatisfying , was to create artificial prices centrally adjusted for emerging shortages and surpluses .
The rejoinder then addressed the flaws in the attempted response rather than returning to the fundamental issue .
Part of the answer might also be that Mises ’ s argument provocatively shows not only that there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that order can not exist without them .
And he further shows that it is not a matter of finding the answer to a puzzle , but that the answer is the puzzle .
To put it very simply , markets work .
This of course makes those who are skeptical or even opposed to markets see red .
And Mises goes further and states that not only do markets work , but that they can only work if there is private property .
The entrepreneurial bidding that determines market prices , on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a division of intellectual labor that works because those taking part can earn money profits but also suffer losses .
Without the risk of suffering personal losses , bids are not truly economic and therefore can not determine real market prices .
As a result , no real calculation is possible .
The system fails .
The issue of private property as a necessary precondition for calculation , as Mises argues , has become a matter of renewed debate .
For example , Andy Denis , a professor at City University London @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only requires decentralized decision-making , not necessarily ownership .
Proper economic calculation should then , Denis argues , be possible under a system of complete state ownership with several controls .
( I respond to this argument in an article coauthored with G.P .
Manish and elaborate on it in a follow-up paper . )
Similarly , Kevin Carson of the Center for a Stateless Society , who is decidedly promarket but antiproperty , argues at that “ if Mises ’ critique proves anything it proves too much.
” Carson ’ s argument @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it focuses on the institutional setting for markets as precursors .
Writes Carson : The allocation of the most fundamental factor inputs is not set by a market mechanism in virtually any economic system .
Markets presuppose , as a meta-principle logically prior to their functioning , the choice of a particular set of property rules out of many possible sets .
The formation of market clearing prices for factor inputs , under the laws of supply and demand , takes place only within the framework of this prior set of property allocation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is not based on justly acquired property but rather rests , historically speaking , on the almost perfectly unjust property allocation that was inherited from feudalism .
Consequently , “ capitalism operates in an environment of massive calculational chaos , with incentives distorted by artificial scarcity or artificial abundance at virtually every turn.
” I will not argue against this conclusion , because it is largely accurate .
Prior injustices do not automatically disappear but rather skew the outcome of the system for as long as resources , as a result , become @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Austrians use the same type of argument against imposed regulations on the market , which similarly distort market signals and resource allocation .
Given a different foundational property rights regime—for example , commons governance of information , land , and resources—the resulting market-clearing prices would likely be far different .
Likewise , the parties to which returns on inputs accrued—and hence incentives—would also be far different .
In every system , the property allocation and governance rules themselves result from social or political choices that are prior to the market , and market @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
He is not wrong .
The specifics of any property regime will certainly affect the prices determined by the entrepreneurial bidding process .
However , this is not a flaw but a feature .
Economic calculation is not about creating a certain allocation of resources , and even less some particular distribution of wealth .
Carson goes wrong in his analysis in the same way as leagues of socialist critics of Mises ’ s calculation argument before him .
He assumes that Mises ’ s argument is about is the actual prices @ @ @ @ @ @ @ calculation process therefore is a way to get those prices right .
But this misses the fundamental point and , like the market socialists , thereby replaces Mises ’ s fundamental theoretical insight with the seemingly simple mechanism itself .
The result is a rather tiresome bickering over whether the prices are right or wrong .
Economic calculation is not about the price-determining mechanism itself .
Yes , the mechanism is important .
But it is important because it determines prices that in turn generate system-level economizing of scarce productive resources in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The point is not the prices themselves , but the price-determining process that allocates factors available in the present toward satisfying consumers ’ wants in the future .
Although resource ownership in the present is indeed an outcome of previous actions and allocations , the prices that are determined are not historic but future prices .
They are based on entrepreneurs ’ best guesses of what consumers will want to consume at different times in the future .
Consequently , the injustice of any distribution of property is quickly undone in a market @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is true that owners of unjust property will be compensated through the prices determined in the economic calculation process .
But this is of much lesser implication than socialists typically appear to think .
First , whoever owns property but does not invest it in entrepreneurial attempts to satisfy consumers will not earn profits and so their relative wealth will dissipate with economic growth .
Second , those property owners who sell resources to entrepreneurs will be paid their market price .
But they will only be paid once .
Although this means @ @ @ @ @ @ @ goods and services , if this money is not itself invested toward the satisfaction of consumers ’ future wants it is but another flavor of the previous case .
Third , those who lend it to entrepreneurs who pursue profits will earn the market rate ( or a share of the profits of the new venture ) .
But while this certainly makes them part of what Carson calls a “ rentier class , ” based on the property amassed unjustly , this cash inflow still depends on choosing to rent out to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Even if the entrepreneur shoulders the risk of the venture , if he or she is wiped out by pursuing what turns out to be a bad idea the invested capital is typically either lost or damaged .
Fourth , the property owner can him- or herself act as entrepreneur and use his or her resources to produce goods that service consumers .
Those resources will then either generate profits because the undertaking serves consumers better than other entrepreneurial endeavors , or losses .
The fact is that there is nothing permanent about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recognize , and have recognized since Menger , capital has value only for its expected contribution to consumers through market production .
Idle capital is either a speculation that there will be better ( more valuable ) future uses or a loss .
It is true that some very durable property can be used for income over an extensive time period , but it is never enough to simply sit on that property and rake in money .
Even land or rental properties require continuous investment to remain useful , and even more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , even for seemingly simple upkeep and maintenance , are entrepreneurial : unless they contribute to consumer satisfaction , they are wasteful .
Nobody can stay rich by making wasteful investments .
As consumers decide which use of scarce resources is rewarded with profit , there is only one way of becoming and staying rich through the market process : by serving consumers .
It is this promise that undergirds the bids placed in the open market and thus that determines the prices of resources .
In the market , and through the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ happened is always , economically speaking , sunk .
To maintain comparative riches one must satisfy consumers , and that can only happen by speculating under the threat of losing it all .
Whatever injustice caused the present or prior resource allocations has close to no impact on the actual outcomes of resource uses , since all efforts are mercilessly evaluated ( and thus rewarded or punished ) by consumers in their future purchase and use decisions .
Who owns a resource is of little importance , because all ownership is subject to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thereby earning profits by serving consumers or suffering losses by failing to do so , or lying idle and consequently missing out on potential returns .
This is not to say that injustices are somehow unimportant .
They certainly are , and libertarians tend to be too forgiving about prior injustices and privilege .
However , as Austrians we recognize , with Mises , that unjust property distributions have far less impact on market outcomes , and much less staying power , than socialists assume .
The unjust allocation of property can not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Only protected resource owners can earn profits without serving consumers .
Mises ’ s economic calculation argument shows why : because calculation is a fundamentally entrepreneurial process that takes place in the present , the fate of each undertaking to be determined in the future by sovereign consumers .

It has been a full century since Mises dropped the economic calculation bomb, but the argument apparently still haunts socialists.
It should, since Mises managed to show that a socialist economy is not an economy at all but calculational chaos. Yet it is curious that it does, since most have (incorrectly) concluded that Mises’s argument, after decades of debate, was debunked.
Why does a presumably debunked argument still, drive even non-Austrian critics to pen new responses and deliberate on apparent flaws?
Part of the answer might be that the debate ended without a proper conclusion. Mises’s critics, specifically the “market socialists” of the 1930s, misconstrued his argument as being about the existence, rather than meaning, of prices. Their answer, as simple as it was unsatisfying, was to create artificial prices centrally adjusted for emerging shortages and surpluses. The rejoinder then addressed the flaws in the attempted response rather than returning to the fundamental issue.
Part of the answer might also be that Mises’s argument provocatively shows not only that there is order to markets, but also that order cannot exist without them. And he further shows that it is not a matter of finding the answer to a puzzle, but that the answer is the puzzle. To put it very simply, markets work.
This of course makes those who are skeptical or even opposed to markets see red. And Mises goes further and states that not only do markets work, but that they can only work if there is private property. The entrepreneurial bidding that determines market prices, on which individual entrepreneurs appraise their undertakings, is a division of intellectual labor that works because those taking part can earn money profits but also suffer losses. Without the risk of suffering personal losses, bids are not truly economic and therefore cannot determine real market prices. As a result, no real calculation is possible. The system fails.
The issue of private property as a necessary precondition for calculation, as Mises argues, has become a matter of renewed debate. For example, Andy Denis, a professor at City University London, argues that Mises’s argument only requires decentralized decision-making, not necessarily ownership. Proper economic calculation should then, Denis argues, be possible under a system of complete state ownership with several controls. (I respond to this argument in an article coauthored with G.P. Manish and elaborate on it in a follow-up paper.)
Similarly, Kevin Carson of the Center for a Stateless Society, who is decidedly promarket but antiproperty, argues at that “if Mises’ critique proves anything it proves too much.” Carson’s argument differs from Denis’s in that it focuses on the institutional setting for markets as precursors. Writes Carson:
The allocation of the most fundamental factor inputs is not set by a market mechanism in virtually any economic system. Markets presuppose, as a meta-principle logically prior to their functioning, the choice of a particular set of property rules out of many possible sets. The formation of market clearing prices for factor inputs, under the laws of supply and demand, takes place only within the framework of this prior set of property allocation and governance rules.
The present market is not based on justly acquired property but rather rests, historically speaking, on the almost perfectly unjust property allocation that was inherited from feudalism. Consequently, “capitalism operates in an environment of massive calculational chaos, with incentives distorted by artificial scarcity or artificial abundance at virtually every turn.”
I will not argue against this conclusion, because it is largely accurate. Prior injustices do not automatically disappear but rather skew the outcome of the system for as long as resources, as a result, become misallocated (i.e., malinvested). Austrians use the same type of argument against imposed regulations on the market, which similarly distort market signals and resource allocation.
Carson continues:
Given a different foundational property rights regime—for example, commons governance of information, land, and resources—the resulting market-clearing prices would likely be far different. Likewise, the parties to which returns on inputs accrued—and hence incentives—would also be far different. In every system, the property allocation and governance rules themselves result from social or political choices that are prior to the market, and market pricing of inputs depends on those rules.
He is not wrong. The specifics of any property regime will certainly affect the prices determined by the entrepreneurial bidding process. However, this is not a flaw but a feature. Economic calculation is not about creating a certain allocation of resources, and even less some particular distribution of wealth.
Carson goes wrong in his analysis in the same way as leagues of socialist critics of Mises’s calculation argument before him. He assumes that Mises’s argument is about is the actual prices that are determined and that the economic calculation process therefore is a way to get those prices right. But this misses the fundamental point and, like the market socialists, thereby replaces Mises’s fundamental theoretical insight with the seemingly simple mechanism itself. The result is a rather tiresome bickering over whether the prices are right or wrong.
Economic calculation is not about the price-determining mechanism itself. Yes, the mechanism is important. But it is important because it determines prices that in turn generate system-level economizing of scarce productive resources in a never-ceasing market process of value creation. The point is not the prices themselves, but the price-determining process that allocates factors available in the present toward satisfying consumers’ wants in the future.
Although resource ownership in the present is indeed an outcome of previous actions and allocations, the prices that are determined are not historic but future prices. They are based on entrepreneurs’ best guesses of what consumers will want to consume at different times in the future. Consequently, the injustice of any distribution of property is quickly undone in a market through the economic calculation process.
It is true that owners of unjust property will be compensated through the prices determined in the economic calculation process. But this is of much lesser implication than socialists typically appear to think. First, whoever owns property but does not invest it in entrepreneurial attempts to satisfy consumers will not earn profits and so their relative wealth will dissipate with economic growth.
Second, those property owners who sell resources to entrepreneurs will be paid their market price. But they will only be paid once. Although this means that they will receive money to purchase goods and services, if this money is not itself invested toward the satisfaction of consumers’ future wants it is but another flavor of the previous case.
Third, those who lend it to entrepreneurs who pursue profits will earn the market rate (or a share of the profits of the new venture). But while this certainly makes them part of what Carson calls a “rentier class,” based on the property amassed unjustly, this cash inflow still depends on choosing to rent out to the entrepreneur who will earn profits. Even if the entrepreneur shoulders the risk of the venture, if he or she is wiped out by pursuing what turns out to be a bad idea the invested capital is typically either lost or damaged.
Fourth, the property owner can him- or herself act as entrepreneur and use his or her resources to produce goods that service consumers. Those resources will then either generate profits because the undertaking serves consumers better than other entrepreneurial endeavors, or losses.
The fact is that there is nothing permanent about capital in a market. As Austrians recognize, and have recognized since Menger, capital has value only for its expected contribution to consumers through market production. Idle capital is either a speculation that there will be better (more valuable) future uses or a loss.
It is true that some very durable property can be used for income over an extensive time period, but it is never enough to simply sit on that property and rake in money. Even land or rental properties require continuous investment to remain useful, and even more investment to remain attractive. Such investments, even for seemingly simple upkeep and maintenance, are entrepreneurial: unless they contribute to consumer satisfaction, they are wasteful. Nobody can stay rich by making wasteful investments.
As consumers decide which use of scarce resources is rewarded with profit, there is only one way of becoming and staying rich through the market process: by serving consumers. It is this promise that undergirds the bids placed in the open market and thus that determines the prices of resources. In the market, and through the economic calculation process, what has already happened is always, economically speaking, sunk. To maintain comparative riches one must satisfy consumers, and that can only happen by speculating under the threat of losing it all.
Whatever injustice caused the present or prior resource allocations has close to no impact on the actual outcomes of resource uses, since all efforts are mercilessly evaluated (and thus rewarded or punished) by consumers in their future purchase and use decisions. Who owns a resource is of little importance, because all ownership is subject to either partaking in the market process, thereby earning profits by serving consumers or suffering losses by failing to do so, or lying idle and consequently missing out on potential returns.
This is not to say that injustices are somehow unimportant. They certainly are, and libertarians tend to be too forgiving about prior injustices and privilege. However, as Austrians we recognize, with Mises, that unjust property distributions have far less impact on market outcomes, and much less staying power, than socialists assume. The unjust allocation of property cannot persist unless the injustice is repeated. Only protected resource owners can earn profits without serving consumers.
Mises’s economic calculation argument shows why: because calculation is a fundamentally entrepreneurial process that takes place in the present, the fate of each undertaking to be determined in the future by sovereign consumers.


newswars--2020-05-21--UK: TV Channel Briefly Goes Off Air to Encourage Viewers to Clap For NHS

Television channel ITV briefly went off air to encourage people in the UK to take part in the weekly ‘ clap for the NHS ’ event .
“ No TV allowed during worship , ” remarked a Twitter user who took a photo of the message , which said , “ We ’ ll be back soon – # ClapForCarers.
” Clap for carers is a weekly ritual whereby Brits are urged to stand outside their houses and on their balconies to applaud health workers .
The practice has been called cringeworthy and akin to a religious ceremony by some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ country take part it in with relish .
As we previously highlighted , one mother who forgot to take part in the clapathon , which takes place every Thursday at 8pm , was publicly shamed by her neighbors on Facebook the next day .
In the United Kingdom , the National Health Service ( NHS ) is treated as a religious institution by many , who insist that it is the “ envy of the world ” and a sterling example of the supremacy of government health care .
In reality , as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the NHS was founded ( when British healthcare was among the best rather than the worst in Europe ) the population of France had a life expectancy six years lower than that of Britain ; it is now two years higher.
” A ranking of health care systems by The Lancet medical journal placed the NHS below Estonia and Slovenia , finding it to have “ an especially low score for cancer care.
” Dalrymple says the NHS worship clapathon reminds him of communist despotism .
“ It reminds me a little , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ louder and almost more hysterical , of the applause after a speech by Nicolae Ceausescu or other communist despot , in which everyone in the audience had to show himself as enthusiastic and the most enthusiastic applauder , and to continue applauding as long as someone else was applauding , for to be the first to stop might be taken as a sign of disloyalty and dissent from the official line , ” wrote the author .
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever @ @ @ @ @ @ @ me .
Please sign up for the free newsletter here .
Donate to me on SubscribeStar here .
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown .

Television channel ITV briefly went off air to encourage people in the UK to take part in the weekly ‘clap for the NHS’ event.
Yes, really.
“No TV allowed during worship,” remarked a Twitter user who took a photo of the message, which said, “We’ll be back soon – #ClapForCarers.”
No TV allowed during worship. pic.twitter.com/h2qr67tSid — TheRawTweet (@RawTweet1337) May 21, 2020
Clap for carers is a weekly ritual whereby Brits are urged to stand outside their houses and on their balconies to applaud health workers.
The practice has been called cringeworthy and akin to a religious ceremony by some, but millions of normies across the country take part it in with relish.
As we previously highlighted, one mother who forgot to take part in the clapathon, which takes place every Thursday at 8pm, was publicly shamed by her neighbors on Facebook the next day.
In the United Kingdom, the National Health Service (NHS) is treated as a religious institution by many, who insist that it is the “envy of the world” and a sterling example of the supremacy of government health care.
In reality, as Dr. Theodore Dalrymple notes, “When the NHS was founded (when British healthcare was among the best rather than the worst in Europe) the population of France had a life expectancy six years lower than that of Britain; it is now two years higher.”
A ranking of health care systems by The Lancet medical journal placed the NHS below Estonia and Slovenia, finding it to have “an especially low score for cancer care.”
Dalrymple says the NHS worship clapathon reminds him of communist despotism.
“It reminds me a little, in its tendency to get longer and louder and almost more hysterical, of the applause after a speech by Nicolae Ceausescu or other communist despot, in which everyone in the audience had to show himself as enthusiastic and the most enthusiastic applauder, and to continue applauding as long as someone else was applauding, for to be the first to stop might be taken as a sign of disloyalty and dissent from the official line,” wrote the author.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me.
Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-05-21--Top Scientific Advisor to UK Government Says 2 Meter Social Distancing Rule Based on “Very Fragile E

Top Scientific Advisor to UK Government Says 2 Meter Social Distancing Rule Based on “Very Fragile Evidence”

A top scientific adviser to the UK government says that the 2 meter social distancing rule is based on “ very fragile evidence.
” The British government has been advising its citizens to keep a 2 meter distance for over two months despite other countries advising the gap only needs to be one meter .
Professor Robert Dingwall , a sociologist at Nottingham Trent University and a member of government advisory group NERVTAG ( New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group ) , said the 2 meter distance was unnecessary .
“ The World Health Organization recommends a one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ since the beginning of last week , ” said Dingwall .
“ If you probe around the recommendations of distance in Europe you will find that a lot of countries have also gone for this really on the basis of a better understanding of the scientific evidence around the possible transmission of infection , ” he added .
Many observers have warned that enforcing the 2 meter rule is practically impossible for many shops , restaurants and bars and will put them out of business .
“ The distance may be a non-scientific @ @ @ @ @ @ @ around the world , as top researchers say there is not solid evidence to back it up , ” reports the Daily Mail .
Former Conservative Party Cabinet minister Iain Duncan-Smith also warned that the 2 meter rule could cripple the hospitality sector .
As I highlight in the video below , the “ new normal ” of social distancing is creating a society so pedantic and cringeworthy , it ’ s almost like it ’ s a tactic to make us want to stay indoors forever .
My voice is being silenced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ want me disappeared forever .
It is CRUCIAL that you support me .
Please sign up for the free newsletter here .
Donate to me on SubscribeStar here .
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown .

A top scientific adviser to the UK government says that the 2 meter social distancing rule is based on “very fragile evidence.”
The British government has been advising its citizens to keep a 2 meter distance for over two months despite other countries advising the gap only needs to be one meter.
Professor Robert Dingwall, a sociologist at Nottingham Trent University and a member of government advisory group NERVTAG (New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group), said the 2 meter distance was unnecessary.
“The World Health Organization recommends a one metre distance, Denmark has adopted it since the beginning of last week,” said Dingwall.
“If you probe around the recommendations of distance in Europe you will find that a lot of countries have also gone for this really on the basis of a better understanding of the scientific evidence around the possible transmission of infection,” he added.
Many observers have warned that enforcing the 2 meter rule is practically impossible for many shops, restaurants and bars and will put them out of business.
“The distance may be a non-scientific estimate that just caught on in countries around the world, as top researchers say there is not solid evidence to back it up,” reports the Daily Mail.
Former Conservative Party Cabinet minister Iain Duncan-Smith also warned that the 2 meter rule could cripple the hospitality sector.
As I highlight in the video below, the “new normal” of social distancing is creating a society so pedantic and cringeworthy, it’s almost like it’s a tactic to make us want to stay indoors forever.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me.
Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-05-21--Connecticut RN Speaks Out About Tyranny And The Covid Hoax

With 21 years of experience as a healthcare worker , RN Josiah Dan recently gave a great speech about what @ @ @ @ @ front lines of the Covid Plandemic .
Dan explained how , as a practicing medical @ @ @ @ @ thousands of others who question the mainstream media narratives surrounding the virus .
“ I @ @ @ @ @ the healthcare community is not of one mind , ” he stated .

With 21 years of experience as a healthcare worker, RN Josiah Dan recently gave a great speech about what he is seeing on the front lines of the Covid Plandemic.
Dan explained how, as a practicing medical professional, he stands with thousands of others who question the mainstream media narratives surrounding the virus.
“I stand here as proof that the healthcare community is not of one mind,” he stated.


newswars--2020-05-21--“Take Down Trump’s Account!” – Mika Brzezinski To Chat With Twitter’s Dorsey

Morning Joe co-anchor Mika Brzezinski is pleading that Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey delete President Donald Trump ’ s account because he keeps bringing up the possibility that her husband and co-host Joe Scarborough killed his intern in 2001 .
Trump has tweeted about the incident several times , as seen in the post below where he wrote , “ guys like Low Ratings Psycho Joe Scarborough are allowed to walk the streets ?
Open Cold Case !
” After Trump repeatedly called for the case to be reopened , Mika apparently had enough and went to Twitter to vent her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ censored .
Brzezinski used her MSNBC platform to address Trump ’ s tweets , saying , “ Donald , you ’ re a sick person .
You ’ re a sick person , to put this family through this , to put her husband through this , to do this just because you ’ re mad at Joe , because Joe got you again today.
” “ Because he speaks the truth , and he speaks plainly about your lack of interest and empathy in others and your lack of ability to handle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that you have made it worse and you make it worse every day .
And that you won ’ t even wear a mask to protect people from your germs , ” she concluded .
On Wednesday , Mika went on a tweeting spree in an attempt to get Twitter ’ s attention and ask him why he hasn ’ t banned Trump ’ s account yet .
“ I will be reaching out to head of twitter about their policies being violated every day by President Tump , ” she announced next @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Please retweet if you agree.
” “ Jack please take my call today , ” she said , directing the message to Dorsey this time .
“ Please stop allowing your platform policies to be abused by the day .
It ’ s called libel.
” Becoming increasingly frustrated , Brzezinski asked Jack Dorsey , “ At what point is Twitter a part of this ?
” and claimed , “ the world [ would be ] be safer ” if Trump ’ s account was deleted .
An hour later , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a call with Dorsey .
Republican Senator Ted Cruz of Texas slammed Mika for “ asking Silicon Valley billionaires to silence the President of the United States , ” adding , “ Journalists should NOT be calling for censorship .
”

Morning Joe co-anchor Mika Brzezinski is pleading that Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey delete President Donald Trump’s account because he keeps bringing up the possibility that her husband and co-host Joe Scarborough killed his intern in 2001.
Trump has tweeted about the incident several times, as seen in the post below where he wrote, “guys like Low Ratings Psycho Joe Scarborough are allowed to walk the streets? Open Cold Case!”
….Roger Stone has been treated very unfairly. How about that jury Forewoman, does anybody think that was fair. DISGRACEFUL! Stay tuned. @FoxNews And guys like Low Ratings Psycho Joe Scarborough are allowed to walk the streets? Open Cold Case! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 20, 2020 Visit our store now before the sale ends!
After Trump repeatedly called for the case to be reopened, Mika apparently had enough and went to Twitter to vent her frustration and call for POTUS to be censored.
Brzezinski used her MSNBC platform to address Trump’s tweets, saying, “Donald, you’re a sick person. You’re a sick person, to put this family through this, to put her husband through this, to do this just because you’re mad at Joe, because Joe got you again today.”
“Because he speaks the truth, and he speaks plainly about your lack of interest and empathy in others and your lack of ability to handle this massive human catastrophe, the fact that you have made it worse and you make it worse every day. And that you won’t even wear a mask to protect people from your germs,” she concluded.
Mika has had it…… pic.twitter.com/uVUibSP72E — Mark Schweitzer (@MarkSchweitzer) May 20, 2020
On Wednesday, Mika went on a tweeting spree in an attempt to get Twitter’s attention and ask him why he hasn’t banned Trump’s account yet.
.@twitter need to know why trump is not banned? — Mika Brzezinski (@morningmika) May 20, 2020
“I will be reaching out to head of twitter about their policies being violated every day by President Tump,” she announced next. “Hope my call is taken. Please retweet if you agree.”
I will be reaching out to head of twitter about their policies being violated every day by President Tump. Hope my call is taken. Please retweet if you agree — Mika Brzezinski (@morningmika) May 20, 2020
“Jack please take my call today,” she said, directing the message to Dorsey this time. “Please stop allowing your platform policies to be abused by the day. It’s called libel.”
. @jack please take my call today. Please stop allowing your platform policies to be abused by the day. It’s called libel. — Mika Brzezinski (@morningmika) May 20, 2020
Becoming increasingly frustrated, Brzezinski asked Jack Dorsey, “At what point is Twitter a part of this?” and claimed, “the world [would be] be safer” if Trump’s account was deleted.
.@jack At what point is @Twitter a part of this? TAKE DOWN TRUMP’s ACCOUNT— the world world be safer. Retweet if you agree — Mika Brzezinski (@morningmika) May 20, 2020
An hour later, Mika happily declared she had set up a call with Dorsey.
A call is being set up with @jack and the GC. Thanks for your interest. I will keep you posted https://t.co/eyQwke6KB4 — Mika Brzezinski (@morningmika) May 20, 2020
Republican Senator Ted Cruz of Texas slammed Mika for “asking Silicon Valley billionaires to silence the President of the United States,” adding, “Journalists should NOT be calling for censorship.”