newswars--2020-03-06--Why Deflation Can Be a Good Thing

Why Deflation Can Be a Good Thing

André de Godoy : Please explain the relationship between the money supply , the price level , and economic activity .
Antony Mueller : The supply of money determines the price level in the long run .
Whether prices will rise or fall depends on the relative variation of the money in circulation compared to the relative variation of the supply of goods .
However , one must take into account that the process from the creation of money by the central bank , the so-called monetary base , and the impact on the economy in terms of demand is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
These transmitters of the monetary impulse can work in tandem and strengthen the original impulse or , say , may counteract each other .
Let me give you an example : over the past fifteen years , the main central banks have practiced the policy of “ quantitative easing , ” which has expanded their balance sheet by a factor of over five .
In the United States , the monetary base rose from $ 830 billion in January 2008 to over $ 4 trillion in September 2014 and stands as of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ $ 3.4 trillion .
Yet this drastic increase has not led to a price inflation and has stimulated economic activity only moderately .
The reason for this is that the commercial banking sector did only transform a part of this base money into money in circulation and that the economic agents reduced the transaction velocity .
For the monetary aggregate M1 , the velocity halved from 10.6 in early 2008 to 5.5 in the fourth quarter of 2019 .
Godoy : Authors like Ludwig von Mises and Milton Friedman hold that inflation is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have heard that it is possible to expand the amount of money in circulation without causing negative effects for the economy because inflationary effects could be controlled by the adjustment of the interest rate .
Is this true or just a remedy ?
Mueller : This is a very confused view .
What sense does it make to expand the money supply and then try to control it by raising the interest rate ?
The result of such a policy is market turmoil and confusion .
It is interventionism of the worst kind @ @ @ @ @ @ @ anyway ?
If the supply remains fixed , and productivity rises , prices will fall .
That is beneficial deflation .
Why should one complain when the goods become cheaper for the consumers ?
The point is whether price deflation happens slowly according to productivity increases in the economy or abruptly as a hefty liquidity contraction due to a financial market crisis .
Godoy : Why do central banks try to manipulate the money supply ?
Mueller : Central bankers have a deep-seated fear of deflation .
They presume that a price deflation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Yet if central banks had left the system alone , such a deflation would be very gradual and not only be not harmful but beneficial for the economy .
If the central banks intervene and expand the money supply and implement , as it is the case today , a “ zero interest rate policy “ ( ZIRP ) , or even a “ negative interest rate policy ” ( NIRP ) , a tension builds up between the natural tendency of the prices to fall because of productivity increases and the inflationary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up between the human time preference and the monetary rate of interest which would converge in a free market without central bank interventions .
Godoy : Would a stable money supply not be too rigid for the economy ?
Mueller : One must remember that a falling or rising price level is the result of the difference between the rate of variation of the supply of goods and the rate of variation of the money stock and the velocity of economic transactions .
The monetary system has a natural elasticity .
Even when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fixed supply of central bank money , expansions and contractions of nominal spending will take place .
Money has loose joints , but when the monetary base is stable , the system has a definite anchor .
There is elasticity of money under a gold standard even when the stock of gold is constant .
Different from what we observe today , no long-term and extreme divergences were possible .
We must change our present monetary system which is highly dysfunctional .
Godoy : Some prominent Brazilian economists mention the post-Keynesian theory as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of money and claim that the so-called modern monetary theory would provide a better model for the present .
Mueller : As I explained above , even when the money supply stays fixed the use of money is volatile , and thus even a gold standard has monetary elasticity .
It is wrong to claim that only fiduciary money would provide financial flexibility .
The point , rather , is that with an anchored monetary system , the degree of deviation is limited , while under the current fiat money regime there is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the modern monetary theory .
Its adherents praise an anchorless system , because it would allow unlimited funding of government expenditure .
Even these theorists , however , recognize the problem of price inflation when the money supply is excessive .
In this case , they believe , the government could control price inflation through taxation and then siphon off the excess money .
Yet while the adherents of this “ new ” monetary theory praise anchorless money as a boon because they live under the illusion that the economy is in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ truth is that it is not the free market that produces booms and busts but the intervention of the governments and their central bankers .
Godoy : Could you cite a few examples of how inflation comes about in our day because of the monetary policies that governments have recently pursued ?
Mueller : Venezuela is currently a sad example along with the very tragic case of Zimbabwe .
Let ’ s concentrate on Brazil ’ s neighbor country .
Massive government spending , foolish interventionism , and the expansion of the money @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Venezuela .
These policies form part of the grander plan of implementing a “ Socialism of the Twenty-First Century.
” But what they got was not prosperity and equality but even sharper social divisions , a brutal hyperinflation , and mass misery .
Venezuela is the empirical verification of what we have discussed : the process begins with the false promises of social justice and comprehensive welfare .
Private property is no longer secure , government intervention is on the rise , and business investment falls .
Yet instead of the deteriorating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ course , government expenditures , based on credit expansion , increase even more and with them rises the money supply .
While more regulation and interventionism suffocate the supply side , inflationary demand is on the rise .
The country enters a deadly spiral of economic , political , and social crises that reinforce each other .
At the very beginning of this process , some illusionary benefits appear , yet after a short while the poorest people are those who suffer most until it also brings down the whole rest of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : From what I ’ ve gathered , monetary inflation itself is not the problem that causes a raise in the price levels .
The problems are people ’ s expectations and the speed with which transactions happen , is that correct ?
Mueller : Well , let us put it this way : the reason for obesity is not the food but how much one eats .
The expansion of the money supply is the food .
Whether the economic actors take the offer is another question .
In this decision expectations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ however , we must consider that expectations do not come from nowhere .
They have a point of reference in the economic reality and in the public discourse , including the media .
The laissez-faire approach to money does not mean the absence of control .
It is rather the present monetary system , with constant central bank intervention and the craving of governments for deficit spending , that is out of control .
In contrast to a fiat money system , a gold standard or a similar system with a strong anchor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Godoy : The mechanism that uses interest rates to control inflation is actually a way to try and contain price raises in a fiat money system , right ?
Mueller : For the policymakers , interest rates are an instrument of intervention while for Austrian economics they should reflect time preference and as such would be the natural rate .
Policymakers can only manipulate the monetary rate of interest .
What matters is the money supply and the expectations .
A higher interest rate makes borrowing more expensive and thus may stop @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the economy .
Furthermore , higher interest rates may change expectations about future price inflation and thus reduce the velocity of circulation .
The main point , however , about raising the interest rate is that the central bank has to reduce the monetary base in order to obtain higher interest rates .
Central banks can not just raise the interest rate and leave the monetary base as it was .
When central banks target a certain level as their policy rate of interest , they must manage the monetary base accordingly @

André de Godoy: Please explain the relationship between the money supply, the price level, and economic activity.
Antony Mueller: The supply of money determines the price level in the long run. Whether prices will rise or fall depends on the relative variation of the money in circulation compared to the relative variation of the supply of goods. However, one must take into account that the process from the creation of money by the central bank, the so-called monetary base, and the impact on the economy in terms of demand is long and contains a series of variables. These transmitters of the monetary impulse can work in tandem and strengthen the original impulse or, say, may counteract each other. Let me give you an example: over the past fifteen years, the main central banks have practiced the policy of “quantitative easing,” which has expanded their balance sheet by a factor of over five. In the United States, the monetary base rose from $830 billion in January 2008 to over $4 trillion in September 2014 and stands as of now, in January 2020, at $3.4 trillion. Yet this drastic increase has not led to a price inflation and has stimulated economic activity only moderately. The reason for this is that the commercial banking sector did only transform a part of this base money into money in circulation and that the economic agents reduced the transaction velocity. For the monetary aggregate M1, the velocity halved from 10.6 in early 2008 to 5.5 in the fourth quarter of 2019.
Godoy: Authors like Ludwig von Mises and Milton Friedman hold that inflation is a monetary phenomenon. However, I have heard that it is possible to expand the amount of money in circulation without causing negative effects for the economy because inflationary effects could be controlled by the adjustment of the interest rate. Is this true or just a remedy?
Mueller: This is a very confused view. What sense does it make to expand the money supply and then try to control it by raising the interest rate? The result of such a policy is market turmoil and confusion. It is interventionism of the worst kind. Why should the money supply increase anyway? If the supply remains fixed, and productivity rises, prices will fall. That is beneficial deflation. Why should one complain when the goods become cheaper for the consumers? The point is whether price deflation happens slowly according to productivity increases in the economy or abruptly as a hefty liquidity contraction due to a financial market crisis.
Godoy: Why do central banks try to manipulate the money supply?
Mueller: Central bankers have a deep-seated fear of deflation. They presume that a price deflation will lead to an economic contraction. Yet if central banks had left the system alone, such a deflation would be very gradual and not only be not harmful but beneficial for the economy. If the central banks intervene and expand the money supply and implement, as it is the case today, a “zero interest rate policy“ (ZIRP), or even a “negative interest rate policy” (NIRP), a tension builds up between the natural tendency of the prices to fall because of productivity increases and the inflationary money supply. A deep discrepancy builds up between the human time preference and the monetary rate of interest which would converge in a free market without central bank interventions.
Godoy: Would a stable money supply not be too rigid for the economy?
Mueller: One must remember that a falling or rising price level is the result of the difference between the rate of variation of the supply of goods and the rate of variation of the money stock and the velocity of economic transactions. The monetary system has a natural elasticity. Even when the money supply is linked to a fixed supply of central bank money, expansions and contractions of nominal spending will take place. Money has loose joints, but when the monetary base is stable, the system has a definite anchor. There is elasticity of money under a gold standard even when the stock of gold is constant. Different from what we observe today, no long-term and extreme divergences were possible. We must change our present monetary system which is highly dysfunctional.
Godoy: Some prominent Brazilian economists mention the post-Keynesian theory as a counterpoint to the classical quantity theory of money and claim that the so-called modern monetary theory would provide a better model for the present.
Mueller: As I explained above, even when the money supply stays fixed the use of money is volatile, and thus even a gold standard has monetary elasticity. It is wrong to claim that only fiduciary money would provide financial flexibility. The point, rather, is that with an anchored monetary system, the degree of deviation is limited, while under the current fiat money regime there is no constraint. That is the problem with the modern monetary theory. Its adherents praise an anchorless system, because it would allow unlimited funding of government expenditure. Even these theorists, however, recognize the problem of price inflation when the money supply is excessive. In this case, they believe, the government could control price inflation through taxation and then siphon off the excess money. Yet while the adherents of this “new” monetary theory praise anchorless money as a boon because they live under the illusion that the economy is in permanent need of macroeconomic management, the truth is that it is not the free market that produces booms and busts but the intervention of the governments and their central bankers.
Godoy: Could you cite a few examples of how inflation comes about in our day because of the monetary policies that governments have recently pursued?
Mueller: Venezuela is currently a sad example along with the very tragic case of Zimbabwe. Let’s concentrate on Brazil’s neighbor country. Massive government spending, foolish interventionism, and the expansion of the money supply are behind the gigantic price inflation in Venezuela. These policies form part of the grander plan of implementing a “Socialism of the Twenty-First Century.” But what they got was not prosperity and equality but even sharper social divisions, a brutal hyperinflation, and mass misery. Venezuela is the empirical verification of what we have discussed: the process begins with the false promises of social justice and comprehensive welfare. Private property is no longer secure, government intervention is on the rise, and business investment falls. Yet instead of the deteriorating economy inducing the political leadership to change course, government expenditures, based on credit expansion, increase even more and with them rises the money supply. While more regulation and interventionism suffocate the supply side, inflationary demand is on the rise. The country enters a deadly spiral of economic, political, and social crises that reinforce each other. At the very beginning of this process, some illusionary benefits appear, yet after a short while the poorest people are those who suffer most until it also brings down the whole rest of the society in a cataclysmic collapse.
Godoy: From what I’ve gathered, monetary inflation itself is not the problem that causes a raise in the price levels. The problems are people’s expectations and the speed with which transactions happen, is that correct?
Mueller: Well, let us put it this way: the reason for obesity is not the food but how much one eats. The expansion of the money supply is the food. Whether the economic actors take the offer is another question. In this decision expectations play a major role. Here, however, we must consider that expectations do not come from nowhere. They have a point of reference in the economic reality and in the public discourse, including the media. The laissez-faire approach to money does not mean the absence of control. It is rather the present monetary system, with constant central bank intervention and the craving of governments for deficit spending, that is out of control. In contrast to a fiat money system, a gold standard or a similar system with a strong anchor would combine short-term flexibility with long-term stability.
Godoy: The mechanism that uses interest rates to control inflation is actually a way to try and contain price raises in a fiat money system, right?
Mueller: For the policymakers, interest rates are an instrument of intervention while for Austrian economics they should reflect time preference and as such would be the natural rate. Policymakers can only manipulate the monetary rate of interest. What matters is the money supply and the expectations. A higher interest rate makes borrowing more expensive and thus may stop the expansion of the circulation of money in the economy. Furthermore, higher interest rates may change expectations about future price inflation and thus reduce the velocity of circulation. The main point, however, about raising the interest rate is that the central bank has to reduce the monetary base in order to obtain higher interest rates. Central banks cannot just raise the interest rate and leave the monetary base as it was. When central banks target a certain level as their policy rate of interest, they must manage the monetary base accordingly.


newswars--2020-03-06--Scientists Create New Experiment to Hunt Subatomic Particles

One of the greatest mysteries in astrophysics these days is a tiny subatomic particle called a neutrino , so small that it passes through matter – the atmosphere , our bodies , the very Earth – without detection .
Physicists around the world have for decades been trying to detect neutrinos , which are constantly bombarding our planet and which are lighter than any other known subatomic particles .
Scientists hope that by capturing neutrinos , they can study them and , hopefully , understand where they come from and what they do .
But existing attempts are often expensive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ high-energy neutrinos from some of the furthest reaches of space .
A new study published today in the journal Physical Review Letters shows , for the first time , an experiment that could detect that class of neutrinos using radar echoes .
“ These neutrinos are fundamental particles that we don ’ t understand , ” said Steven Prohira , lead author of the study and a researcher at The Ohio State University Center for Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics .
“ And ultra-high-energy neutrinos can tell us about huge parts of the universe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in any other way .
We need to figure out how to study them , and that ’ s what this experiment tries to do.
” The study relies on a phenomenon known as a cascade .
Scientists think neutrinos move through the Earth at almost the speed of light – billions of them are passing through you now , as you read this .
Higher-energy neutrinos are more likely to collide with atoms .
Those collisions cause a cascade of charged particles – “ like a giant spray , ” Prohira said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ If researchers can detect the cascade , they can detect a neutrino .
Ultra-high-energy neutrinos are so rare that scientists so far have not been able to detect them .
Scientists have figured out that the best places to detect neutrinos are in large sheets of remote ice : The longest-running and most successful neutrino experiments are in Antarctica .
But those experiments so far have not been able to detect neutrinos with higher energies .
That ’ s where Prohira ’ s research comes in : His team showed , in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ detect the cascade that happens when a neutrino hits an atom by bouncing radio waves off of the trail of charged particles left by the cascade .
For this study , they went to the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory in California , set up a 4-meter-long plastic target to simulate ice in Antarctica , and blasted the target with a billion electrons packed into a tiny bunch to simulate neutrinos .
( The total energy of that electron bunch , Prohira said , is similar to the total energy of a high-energy neutrino @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the plastic target to see if the waves would indeed detect a cascade .
They did .
Prohira said the next step is to take the experiment to Antarctica , to see if it can detect neutrinos over a wide volume of remote ice there .
Radio waves are the cheapest known technology for detecting neutrinos , he said , “ which is part of why this is so exciting.
” Radio waves have been used in the search for the highest-energy neutrinos for about 20 years , Prohira said .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the radio wave toolbox for scientists hoping to study ultra-high-energy neutrinos .
And having a greater understanding of neutrinos could help us understand more about our galaxy and the rest of the universe .
“ Neutrinos are the only known particles that travel in straight lines — they go right through things , ” he said .
“ There aren ’ t any other particles that do that : Light gets blocked .
Other charged particles get deflected in magnetic fields.
” When a neutrino is created somewhere in the universe , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unaltered .
“ It points straight back to the thing that produced it , ” Prohira said .
“ So , it ’ s a way for us to identify and learn more about these extremely energetic processes in the universe.
” Dr. Francis Boyle joins The Alex Jones Show to break down the pandemic America is going to face as coronavirus spreads .

One of the greatest mysteries in astrophysics these days is a tiny subatomic particle called a neutrino, so small that it passes through matter – the atmosphere, our bodies, the very Earth – without detection.
Physicists around the world have for decades been trying to detect neutrinos, which are constantly bombarding our planet and which are lighter than any other known subatomic particles. Scientists hope that by capturing neutrinos, they can study them and, hopefully, understand where they come from and what they do.
But existing attempts are often expensive, and miss an entire class of high-energy neutrinos from some of the furthest reaches of space.
A new study published today in the journal Physical Review Letters shows, for the first time, an experiment that could detect that class of neutrinos using radar echoes.
“These neutrinos are fundamental particles that we don’t understand,” said Steven Prohira, lead author of the study and a researcher at The Ohio State University Center for Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. “And ultra-high-energy neutrinos can tell us about huge parts of the universe that we can’t really access in any other way. We need to figure out how to study them, and that’s what this experiment tries to do.”
The study relies on a phenomenon known as a cascade. Scientists think neutrinos move through the Earth at almost the speed of light – billions of them are passing through you now, as you read this.
Higher-energy neutrinos are more likely to collide with atoms. Those collisions cause a cascade of charged particles – “like a giant spray,” Prohira said. And the cascades are important: If researchers can detect the cascade, they can detect a neutrino. Ultra-high-energy neutrinos are so rare that scientists so far have not been able to detect them.
Scientists have figured out that the best places to detect neutrinos are in large sheets of remote ice: The longest-running and most successful neutrino experiments are in Antarctica. But those experiments so far have not been able to detect neutrinos with higher energies.
That’s where Prohira’s research comes in: His team showed, in a laboratory, that it is possible to detect the cascade that happens when a neutrino hits an atom by bouncing radio waves off of the trail of charged particles left by the cascade.
For this study, they went to the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory in California, set up a 4-meter-long plastic target to simulate ice in Antarctica, and blasted the target with a billion electrons packed into a tiny bunch to simulate neutrinos. (The total energy of that electron bunch, Prohira said, is similar to the total energy of a high-energy neutrino.) Then they transmitted radio waves at the plastic target to see if the waves would indeed detect a cascade. They did.
Prohira said the next step is to take the experiment to Antarctica, to see if it can detect neutrinos over a wide volume of remote ice there.
Radio waves are the cheapest known technology for detecting neutrinos, he said, “which is part of why this is so exciting.” Radio waves have been used in the search for the highest-energy neutrinos for about 20 years, Prohira said. This radar technique could be one more tool in the radio wave toolbox for scientists hoping to study ultra-high-energy neutrinos.
And having a greater understanding of neutrinos could help us understand more about our galaxy and the rest of the universe.
“Neutrinos are the only known particles that travel in straight lines — they go right through things,” he said. “There aren’t any other particles that do that: Light gets blocked. Other charged particles get deflected in magnetic fields.”
When a neutrino is created somewhere in the universe, it travels in a straight line, unaltered.
“It points straight back to the thing that produced it,” Prohira said. “So, it’s a way for us to identify and learn more about these extremely energetic processes in the universe.”
Dr. Francis Boyle joins The Alex Jones Show to break down the pandemic America is going to face as coronavirus spreads.


newswars--2020-03-06--Watch Live: Trump Sues CNN For FAKE NEWS; Seeks Millions In Damages

Also catch the streams at infowars.com/show and Banned.video .
Make sure to follow Owen on Tik Tok : Live Feed @ @ @ @ @ Over Two Million Deaths in USA From Coronavirus by July 4 Alex Jones interviews doctors @ @ @ @ @ who weight in on the Coronavirus .
Tune in now !
!
Share this link @ @ @ @ @ incredible news of the day and as we interview doctors and scientists about the spread @ @ @ @ @ Knight Show : Coronavirus – No Crisis Wasted , Abort Schumer & Obama And Austin @ @ @ @ @ Mystery Tune in to the most banned news outlet in the world !
On this @ @ @ @ @ Knight Show , we ’ ll look into how governments worldwide are taking advantage of @ @ @ @ @ ’ s threats to the Supreme Court , the 184th anniversary of the Battle of @ @ @ @ @ .
Don ’ t forget to share this highly censored transmission by spreading this link @ @ @ @

Owen Shroyer hosts this LIVE edition of War Room, weekdays 3-6 p.m. CT.
Also catch the streams at infowars.com/show and Banned.video.
Make sure to follow Owen on Tik Tok:
Live Feed: Pandemic Computer Model Shows Over Two Million Deaths in USA From Coronavirus by July 4
Alex Jones interviews doctors, scientists and computer experts who weight in on the Coronavirus. Tune in now!!
Share this link as we cover all the incredible news of the day and as we interview doctors and scientists about the spread of the Coronavirus:
Follow Infowars on Telegram:
David Knight Show: Coronavirus – No Crisis Wasted, Abort Schumer & Obama And Austin Powers Endorse Biden Man Of Mystery
Tune in to the most banned news outlet in the world!
On this Friday broadcast of The David Knight Show, we’ll look into how governments worldwide are taking advantage of the coronavirus, Chuck Schumer’s threats to the Supreme Court, the 184th anniversary of the Battle of the Alamo and much more.
Don’t forget to share this highly censored transmission by spreading this link on social media.
Watch Live: #Coronavirus No Crisis Wasted; Abort #Schumer, Obama And Austin Powers Endorse Biden Man Of Mystery https://t.co/mw8Hu95MJS — David Knight (@libertytarian) March 6, 2020


newswars--2020-03-06--Five Schools In Pennsylvania Shut Down Due to Coronavirus Exposure

Five schools in Pennsylvania have been closed after students and teachers attended a party with an out-of-state visitor who is now confirmed to have coronavirus .
Central Bucks County School District has shut the schools down and ordered a deep clean of all facilities .
County officials “ found out late Thursday night someone from out of state , who is now known to have coronavirus , went to a party at a home within the district , ” WFMZ reports , citing a Bucks County spokesperson .
“ Multiple children and staff , who attend the five closed schools @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said.
” No one at the party knew the attendee had contracted COVID-19 , including the infected , according to officials .
County officials say they consulted with state and local health authorities and determined to close the schools “ out of an abundance of caution.
” Two elementary schools , two middle schools , and a high school have been shut down .
Bucks County Department of Health says it is working to track down anyone who attended the party and monitoring their health and potential symptoms .
Pennsylvania has announced its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one in Wayne County and another in Delaware County .
The infected individual from Wayne County “ recently traveled to a country where COVID-19 is present , ” and the Delaware County resident “ recently traveled to an area of the United States where COVID-19 is present , ” according to a statement released by the office of Gov .
Tom Wolf .
Alex Jones breaks down how and why America ’ s economic infrastructure will be put to the ultimate test by the global coronavirus panic .
Also , Ultra 12 is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ultimate source of energy at 40 % off now !

Five schools in Pennsylvania have been closed after students and teachers attended a party with an out-of-state visitor who is now confirmed to have coronavirus.
Central Bucks County School District has shut the schools down and ordered a deep clean of all facilities.
County officials “found out late Thursday night someone from out of state, who is now known to have coronavirus, went to a party at a home within the district,” WFMZ reports, citing a Bucks County spokesperson.
“Multiple children and staff, who attend the five closed schools, were at the party, officials said.”
No one at the party knew the attendee had contracted COVID-19, including the infected, according to officials.
County officials say they consulted with state and local health authorities and determined to close the schools “out of an abundance of caution.”
Two elementary schools, two middle schools, and a high school have been shut down.
Bucks County Department of Health says it is working to track down anyone who attended the party and monitoring their health and potential symptoms.
Pennsylvania has announced its first two confirmed cases of coronavirus, one in Wayne County and another in Delaware County.
The infected individual from Wayne County “recently traveled to a country where COVID-19 is present,” and the Delaware County resident “recently traveled to an area of the United States where COVID-19 is present,” according to a statement released by the office of Gov. Tom Wolf.
Alex Jones breaks down how and why America’s economic infrastructure will be put to the ultimate test by the global coronavirus panic.
Dan Lyman: Follow @CitizenAnalyst
Also, Ultra 12 is back by popular demand! Get the ultimate source of energy at 40% off now!


newswars--2020-03-06--Leftists Fear Trump Will Exploit Coronavirus to the Postpone the Election

Leftists fear that President Trump may cite the coronavirus outbreak as an excuse to postpone the election and remain in power .
With over 233 cases and 14 deaths now being reported inside the U.S. , some are concerned that the panic surrounding the outbreak will be exploited to allow Trump to stay in the Oval Office beyond January 2021 .
Numerous users took to Twitter to assert that Trump is deliberately botching the response to take political advantage of any potential pandemic .
The notion that Trump would use coronavirus as an excuse to delay the election is pretty @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tried to downplay the issue .
Trump is also in a good position to win re-election , so unless his poll numbers tank , it wouldn ’ t make much sense to postpone the vote However , it ’ s not just conspiracy-minded Twitter users who think a delayed election might be the outcome .
Author and social critic James Howard Kunstler points out that a deadlier second wave of coronavirus could return in November , mandating a postponement .
“ There ’ s a possibility that Corona Virus might interfere with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to work in waves , ” writes Kunstler .
“ If this is the first wave now , then a second wave would arrive just about in time for election day , November 3 .
Second wave viral diseases can be more virulent than the first wave , which was the case with the so-called Spanish flu of 1918 .
And what if a substantial portion of voters don ’ t dare venture into public places full of their possibly infectious fellow citizens ?
Would Mr. Trump be forced to postpone the election @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he seeks to become the American Caesar ?
” Whether Trump downplays or overplays the threat posed by coronavirus , it seems he ’ ll be blamed either way .
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever .
It is CRUCIAL that you support me .
Please sign up for the free newsletter here .
Donate to me on SubscribeStar here .

Leftists fear that President Trump may cite the coronavirus outbreak as an excuse to postpone the election and remain in power.
With over 233 cases and 14 deaths now being reported inside the U.S., some are concerned that the panic surrounding the outbreak will be exploited to allow Trump to stay in the Oval Office beyond January 2021.
Numerous users took to Twitter to assert that Trump is deliberately botching the response to take political advantage of any potential pandemic.
Okay, Ms. Conspiracy over here…Am I the only one who fears due to Trump’s ignorance and not doing the right thing about this virus…
That he will us this sickness as an excuse to postpone the election? — Deborah…He’ IMPEACHED! Let’s send him to JAIL!! (@ThreeDawgLadyDe) March 6, 2020
Calling it now: if it looks like Trump will lose in November he’ll call a state of emergency over #coronavirus and “postpone” the election. — Lauren *Fuck the Patriarchy* G. (@lapearce) March 6, 2020
Here’s a crazy take: If the corona virus becomes a full-fledged national disaster, Trump will quit rather have to deal with it and be held accountable. However, the more likely outcome is that he’ll declare martial law and “postpone” the election. — boomhauertjs (@boomhauertjs) March 6, 2020
Anyone else think tRump is mishandling the Corona Virus in hopes of an epidemic that will give him cover to “postpone” or even cancel the 2020 election? I do believe he is that evil and devious to try and pull it off…..of course no Republican is going to step in to stop him!!! — @Skoots (@Skoots8) March 6, 2020
And Trump may be thinking that if he stalls on the testing and more people get ill, he can postpone the Election for President saying it is too dangerous. I really think he is that evil putting American’s at risk. — Jimmie Field (@FieldJimmie) March 6, 2020
What if *trump says, in Oct., that America is in an epidemic and says
“We’re going to postpone the election”
(for like 4yrs) Do you think America would say NO, and take to the streets, whether peacefully or violently? — Lefty–an old hippie very anti-trump* ☮🇺🇸 (@BobDylanRules) March 6, 2020
I also think trump has anterior motives, if people are sick they can’t vote, he may try to postpone election, I know that sounds crazy but look what he’s been doing these last 3yrs. — Pamela Gurko (@GurkoPamela) March 6, 2020
Is it possible that he’s hoping for a nationwide epidemic, so he can indefinitely postpone the election by declaring a national state of emergency and calling for a national quarantine?? He’s already proven that he doesn’t care about anyone but himself. — Greg Deckard (@gregdeckard) March 6, 2020
TRUMP WANTS TO DECLARE A NATIONAL EMERGENCY SO HE CAN POSTPONE THE ELECTION IF THE ELECTION WAS TOMORROW TRUMP WOULD DECLARE A NATIONAL EMERGENCY TODAY https://t.co/K7sEGsvekf — THE TRUTH (@realtruthhurt) March 6, 2020
How many people think Trump would postpone the 2020 election over a Coronavirus outbreak? — Alan Graham (@agraham999) March 6, 2020
Once Trump realizes that this is actually beyond his control he will switch his rhetoric and messaging from “this will go away and isn’t a big deal” to “my experts are recommending that we postpone the election… “ — Hector Torres (@hectorology) March 6, 2020
Also batshit crazy prediction: coronavirus becomes endemic in the US and Trump uses it as an excuse to declare a state of emergency or whatever and postpone the election, or loses the election but refuses to leave office for the same reason. — Scott (@realscottberry) March 6, 2020
I think Trump will use the #coronavirus (he’s not doing anything to control) as an excuse to postpone the election. — InvisiBelle (@InvisibelleMS) March 6, 2020
(puts on tinfoil hat) At what point do we speculate Trump will embrace the idea of CV pandemic panic since it could depress vote in Nov or even give him the chance to try and postpone Election Day? — Altuve’s Unfinished Tattoo (@stephmhishot) March 6, 2020
Yes, it is intentional. It gives trump a reason to cancel or postpone the election, or declare martial law. It also may think out the population in big cities, which vote blue. — Tina🇺🇸🗽🌊🌎🍩🏳🌈 (@TinaMarie88888) March 6, 2020
If the outbreak gets bad enough, they can use it as an excuse to “postpone”/wins the election in November if it looks like Trump is going to lose. — Blegh (@bleghblorgh) March 6, 2020
Some of us are starting to think Trump can’t postpone an election without declaring a state of emergency and here it is. We’re in crazy town now so yeah… — DjunaB (@DjunaB11) March 6, 2020
🤔 Coronavirus protocol is now to avoid gatherings of over 10 people 🤔 ~puts on tin foil hat~ Coronavirus will be used to shut down voting in Nov, as Trump says for the good of the nation we have to postpone Election Day. ~takes off tin foil hat~ Still wash your hands tho. — CEOs for Bernie 👨💼🐦 (@LiberalCEO) March 6, 2020
My assumption is once the extent and severity of the Coronavirus outbreak becomes undeniable, Trump is going to pivot to trying to cancel/postpone the 2020 election. — Matt Singer (@matthewjsinger) March 6, 2020
If Trump isn’t ahead by like 100 electoral votes in the polls come October you can guarantee he’ll use the coronavirus to postpone the election. — 30 Daves I know agree… (@daveabrowne) March 5, 2020
The notion that Trump would use coronavirus as an excuse to delay the election is pretty far fetched given that he has repeatedly tried to downplay the issue.
Trump is also in a good position to win re-election, so unless his poll numbers tank, it wouldn’t make much sense to postpone the vote
However, it’s not just conspiracy-minded Twitter users who think a delayed election might be the outcome.
Author and social critic James Howard Kunstler points out that a deadlier second wave of coronavirus could return in November, mandating a postponement.
“There’s a possibility that Corona Virus might interfere with the election itself. Viral contagions are known to work in waves,” writes Kunstler.
“If this is the first wave now, then a second wave would arrive just about in time for election day, November 3. Second wave viral diseases can be more virulent than the first wave, which was the case with the so-called Spanish flu of 1918. And what if a substantial portion of voters don’t dare venture into public places full of their possibly infectious fellow citizens? Would Mr. Trump be forced to postpone the election, fulfilling his enemies’ fantasy that he seeks to become the American Caesar?”
Whether Trump downplays or overplays the threat posed by coronavirus, it seems he’ll be blamed either way.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me.
Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.
Support my sponsor – Emergency Survival Foods – delicious dishes & a 25 year shelf life!
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-03-06--Trump Team Sues CNN for Millions

Trump Team Sues CNN for Millions

The Trump administration launched a lawsuit against cable news network CNN Friday , accusing them of defamation over reports alleging the president ’ s re-election campaign is considering help from Russia .
Speaking to Fox News , a Trump attorney said the lawsuit , seeking “ millions of dollars ” in damages , is about holding the network accountable for libeling President Trump and spewing mistruths to the American people .
“ The complaint alleges CNN was aware of the falsity at the time it published them but did so for the intentional purpose of hurting the campaign while misleading @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Trump campaign senior legal adviser Jenna Ellis told Fox News .
“ The campaign filed this lawsuit against CNN and the preceding suits against The New York Times and The Washington Post to hold the publishers accountable for their reckless false reporting and also to establish the truth.
” One part of the complaint , obtained by Fox News , accuses CNN of falsely claiming the Trump campaign had “ assessed the potential risks and benefits of again seeking Russia ’ s help in 2020 and has decided to leave that option @ @ @ @ @ @ @ titled “ Soliciting dirt on your opponents from a foreign government is a crime .
Mueller should have charged Trump campaign officials with it , ” was published on the website on June 13 , 2019 , and is currently still up at the site as of writing .
The network would have known the information was false , the lawsuit alleges , “ because there was an extensive record of statements from the Campaign and the administration expressly disavowing any intention to seek Russian assistance.
” “ The Campaign therefore was left @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lawsuit to : publicly establish the truth , properly inform CNN ’ s readers and audience ( and the rest of the world ) of the true facts , and seek appropriate remedies for the harm caused by CNN ’ s false reporting and failure to retract and apologize for it , ” the lawsuit reportedly states .
The suit follows two other similar complaints launched by the Trump team last month against other mainstream media outlets including The New York Times and The Washington Post .
Owen confronted Anderson Cooper ahead of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cops were called on him and forced him to leave the area .

The Trump administration launched a lawsuit against cable news network CNN Friday, accusing them of defamation over reports alleging the president’s re-election campaign is considering help from Russia.
Speaking to Fox News, a Trump attorney said the lawsuit, seeking “millions of dollars” in damages, is about holding the network accountable for libeling President Trump and spewing mistruths to the American people.
“The complaint alleges CNN was aware of the falsity at the time it published them but did so for the intentional purpose of hurting the campaign while misleading its own readers in the process,” Trump campaign senior legal adviser Jenna Ellis told Fox News.
“The campaign filed this lawsuit against CNN and the preceding suits against The New York Times and The Washington Post to hold the publishers accountable for their reckless false reporting and also to establish the truth.”
One part of the complaint, obtained by Fox News, accuses CNN of falsely claiming the Trump campaign had “assessed the potential risks and benefits of again seeking Russia’s help in 2020 and has decided to leave that option on the table.”
The article, titled “Soliciting dirt on your opponents from a foreign government is a crime. Mueller should have charged Trump campaign officials with it,” was published on the website on June 13, 2019, and is currently still up at the site as of writing.
The network would have known the information was false, the lawsuit alleges, “because there was an extensive record of statements from the Campaign and the administration expressly disavowing any intention to seek Russian assistance.”
“The Campaign therefore was left with no alternative but to file this lawsuit to: publicly establish the truth, properly inform CNN’s readers and audience (and the rest of the world) of the true facts, and seek appropriate remedies for the harm caused by CNN’s false reporting and failure to retract and apologize for it,” the lawsuit reportedly states.
The suit follows two other similar complaints launched by the Trump team last month against other mainstream media outlets including The New York Times and The Washington Post.
Owen confronted Anderson Cooper ahead of the Democrat debate. Soon after the cops were called on him and forced him to leave the area.


newswars--2020-03-06--CNBC’s Rick Santelli Suggests ‘Giving Everybody’ Coronavirus to Calm Financial Markets

CNBC ’ s Rick Santelli suggested infecting everybody with the coronavirus so that its spread would be over quicker in order to calm financial markets .
During his show on Thursday , Santelli suggested that a good way to stop the hysteria and panic would just be to expose everyone to the virus and let it run its course .
“ Of course , people are getting nervous .
And listen , I ’ m not a doctor .
I ’ m not a doctor , ” said Santelli .
“ All I know is , think about how the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ quarantine everybody because of the generic-type flu .
Now I ’ m not saying this is the generic-type flu .
But maybe we ’ d be just better off if we gave it to everybody , and then in a month it would be over because the mortality rate of this probably isn ’ t going to be any different if we did it that way than the long-term picture , but the difference is we ’ re wreaking havoc on global and domestic economies.
” “ This “ GDP First ” ideology @ @ @ @ @ @ @ administration ’ s response to the virus , ” remarks Chris Menahan .
“ President Trump took weeks before putting any restrictions on air travel ( despite being the strong borders candidate ) and made no major moves to prepare for the virus or test travelers for it — lest it spook the markets.
” Santelli made the suggestion despite the fact that infecting everyone on the planet with coronavirus would literally result in the deaths of hundreds of millions of people given that the virus has a 2-3 % kill rate .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ worth paying to save a few percentage points on the GDP !
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever .
It is CRUCIAL that you support me .
Please sign up for the free newsletter here .
Donate to me on SubscribeStar here .

CNBC’s Rick Santelli suggested infecting everybody with the coronavirus so that its spread would be over quicker in order to calm financial markets.
Yes, really.
During his show on Thursday, Santelli suggested that a good way to stop the hysteria and panic would just be to expose everyone to the virus and let it run its course.
One Nation under Market pic.twitter.com/6UlKBSF1xp — Battle Beagle (@HarmlessYardDog) March 6, 2020
“Of course, people are getting nervous. And listen, I’m not a doctor. I’m not a doctor,” said Santelli. “All I know is, think about how the world would be if you tried to quarantine everybody because of the generic-type flu. Now I’m not saying this is the generic-type flu. But maybe we’d be just better off if we gave it to everybody, and then in a month it would be over because the mortality rate of this probably isn’t going to be any different if we did it that way than the long-term picture, but the difference is we’re wreaking havoc on global and domestic economies.”
“This “GDP First” ideology is what has been driving the Trump administration’s response to the virus,” remarks Chris Menahan.
“President Trump took weeks before putting any restrictions on air travel (despite being the strong borders candidate) and made no major moves to prepare for the virus or test travelers for it — lest it spook the markets.”
Santelli made the suggestion despite the fact that infecting everyone on the planet with coronavirus would literally result in the deaths of hundreds of millions of people given that the virus has a 2-3% kill rate.
I guess that’s a price worth paying to save a few percentage points on the GDP!
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me.
Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.
Support my sponsor – Emergency Survival Foods – delicious dishes & a 25 year shelf life!
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-03-06--Biden Hasn’t Taken Cognitive Test, Says Article Trying to Debunk Concerns Over Biden’s Mental Health

An article trying to debunk concerns over Joe Biden ’ s cognitive abilities actually admits the presidential candidate hasn ’ t taken a “ cognitive functioning test.
” The March 6 article published by the Washington Monthly tries to downplay the suggestion that the 77-year-old Biden , a survivor of brain surgery , is going through a cognitive decline which could explain his verbal stumbles and other odd behavior on the campaign trail .
According to the article : We are about to be subjected to a massive disinformation campaign against Joe Biden , and this one will be particularly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who are fact-based , it is important to keep in mind that there is no data to support the allegations that are being made .
But then here ’ s this little juicy tidbit from the same article ( with emphasis added ) : The second piece of evidence to consider is that in December , Biden released a three-page summary of his medical history in which “ his doctor declared he is a ‘ healthy , vigorous ’ 77-year-old fully capable of taking on the role of president.
” Here is what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ public health at the University of Illinois at Chicago who analyzes the longevity of presidents , said about cognitive abilities after reviewing the report .
“ The only test that hasn ’ t been done is the cognitive functioning test , ” Olshansky added .
“ But the fact that he ’ s on the campaign trail and meeting a rigorous travel and meeting schedule probably would suffice as a replacement for the formal test for cognitive functioning.
” In other words , the article says don ’ t worry about Biden ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ records did not indicate a cognitive impairment , ” yet it also says that Biden ’ s cognitive functioning hasn ’ t been tested .
Of course , don ’ t expect the DNC to release any data suggesting Biden is suffering a cognitive decline any time soon , especially after the work likely done behind the scenes to ensure he got an upper hand on Bernie Sanders .
Additionally , if the campaign trail suffices as a “ replacement ” for a cognitive functioning test , as the professor seems to suggest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s strange stumbles be a cause for concern by that logic ?
It ’ s also worth noting that concerns over Biden isn ’ t limited to just Trump supporters : In fact , it might have been Bernie Sanders supporters who first brought it to prominent attention .

An article trying to debunk concerns over Joe Biden’s cognitive abilities actually admits the presidential candidate hasn’t taken a “cognitive functioning test.”
Yes, really.
The March 6 article published by the Washington Monthly tries to downplay the suggestion that the 77-year-old Biden, a survivor of brain surgery, is going through a cognitive decline which could explain his verbal stumbles and other odd behavior on the campaign trail.
According to the article:
We are about to be subjected to a massive disinformation campaign against Joe Biden, and this one will be particularly pernicious. But for those of us who are fact-based, it is important to keep in mind that there is no data to support the allegations that are being made.
But then here’s this little juicy tidbit from the same article (with emphasis added):
The second piece of evidence to consider is that in December, Biden released a three-page summary of his medical history in which “his doctor declared he is a ‘healthy, vigorous’ 77-year-old fully capable of taking on the role of president.” Here is what Stuart Jay Olshansky, a professor of public health at the University of Illinois at Chicago who analyzes the longevity of presidents, said about cognitive abilities after reviewing the report.
“The only test that hasn’t been done is the cognitive functioning test,” Olshansky added. “But the fact that he’s on the campaign trail and meeting a rigorous travel and meeting schedule probably would suffice as a replacement for the formal test for cognitive functioning.”
In other words, the article says don’t worry about Biden’s mental health because “his medical records did not indicate a cognitive impairment,” yet it also says that Biden’s cognitive functioning hasn’t been tested.
Of course, don’t expect the DNC to release any data suggesting Biden is suffering a cognitive decline any time soon, especially after the work likely done behind the scenes to ensure he got an upper hand on Bernie Sanders.
First Joe Biden thought “Super Tuesday” was on Thursday. Then, in the same rally, he stumbled through The Preamble of the Declaration and forgot the word ‘equal’. “We hold these truths to be self evident. All men and women created by the, you know, the thing…” What a mess! pic.twitter.com/tYlytgNjrx — Trump War Room – Text EMPOWER to 88022 (@TrumpWarRoom) March 2, 2020
Additionally, if the campaign trail suffices as a “replacement” for a cognitive functioning test, as the professor seems to suggest, then wouldn’t Biden’s strange stumbles be a cause for concern by that logic?
Biden tells crowd he wants to increase premiums and make sure that healthcare is ‘not quality, but only affordable’… pic.twitter.com/fNhtcW7kxx — Sean Hannity (@seanhannity) March 6, 2020
It’s also worth noting that concerns over Biden isn’t limited to just Trump supporters:
The steadfast, wilful refusal of Dem political & media elites to address what is increasingly visible to the naked eye — Biden’s serious cognitive decline — is frightening indeed, not only for what it portends for 2020 but what it says about the ease of snapping them into line: https://t.co/InZzCja99x — Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) March 5, 2020
In fact, it might have been Bernie Sanders supporters who first brought it to prominent attention.


newswars--2020-03-06--Pompeo Slams China’s ‘Imperfect Coronavirus Data’ For Putting US ‘Behind the Curve’

The novel coronavirus disease was first detected in Wuhan in China ’ s Hubei province in late December 2019 and has since spread worldwide .
The number of people infected globally has surpassed 98,700 , with more than 3,300 fatalities .
Over 55,400 people have recovered .
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has said on Friday , as quoted by CNBC , that “ imperfect ” coronavirus data has put the United Stated “ behind the curve ” .
“ The information that we got at the front end of this thing wasn ’ t perfect and has led @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the challenge we face today has put us behind the curve ” , Pompeo was quoted as saying .
Pompeo also complained that it has been “ incredibly frustrating ” to work with Beijing to obtain the data necessary for developing vaccines and containing the epidemic .
Meanwhile , President of the United States Donald Trump has signed an $ 8.3 billion emergency funding bill into law , the White House Deputy Press Secretary Judd Deere said on Friday .
The US Senate on Thursday overwhelmingly passed the bill for response efforts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the United States , a total of 11 Americans have died so far from the novel strain of the coronavirus , while more than 100 others have been infected .
The US Senate on Thursday overwhelmingly passed an $ 8.3 billion emergency funding bill for response efforts to the novel coronavirus outbreak .
The legislation will now head to US President Donald Trump ’ s desk for his signature .
In February , President Donald Trump , after announcing that Pence would head the coronavirus response , rejected the assessment by US health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the virus would spread more broadly in the United States .
The infection , which originated in the Chinese city of Wuhan in Hubei province in late December , has spread to over 70 countries .
In total , more than 98,000 people have been infected worldwide , with the death toll reaching 3,400 .
Dr. Francis Boyle joins The Alex Jones Show to break down the pandemic America is going to face as coronavirus spreads .

The novel coronavirus disease was first detected in Wuhan in China’s Hubei province in late December 2019 and has since spread worldwide.
The number of people infected globally has surpassed 98,700, with more than 3,300 fatalities. Over 55,400 people have recovered.
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has said on Friday, as quoted by CNBC, that “imperfect” coronavirus data has put the United Stated “behind the curve”.
“The information that we got at the front end of this thing wasn’t perfect and has led us now to a place where much of the challenge we face today has put us behind the curve”, Pompeo was quoted as saying.
Pompeo also complained that it has been “incredibly frustrating” to work with Beijing to obtain the data necessary for developing vaccines and containing the epidemic.
Meanwhile, President of the United States Donald Trump has signed an $8.3 billion emergency funding bill into law, the White House Deputy Press Secretary Judd Deere said on Friday. The US Senate on Thursday overwhelmingly passed the bill for response efforts against the novel coronavirus outbreak.
🚨🚨@realDonaldTrump just signed the Coronavirus Supplemental funding bill before departing the @WhiteHouse for Tennessee. The funding, which the president requested, will accelerate development of a vaccine and assist with response efforts. 🖊 pic.twitter.com/iV9jzncbxT — Judd Deere (@JuddPDeere45) March 6, 2020
Moments ago: President @realDonaldTrump signed the Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental Appropriations Act. pic.twitter.com/GfvfYOsWmu — The White House (@WhiteHouse) March 6, 2020
In the United States, a total of 11 Americans have died so far from the novel strain of the coronavirus, while more than 100 others have been infected.
The US Senate on Thursday overwhelmingly passed an $8.3 billion emergency funding bill for response efforts to the novel coronavirus outbreak. The legislation will now head to US President Donald Trump’s desk for his signature.
In February, President Donald Trump, after announcing that Pence would head the coronavirus response, rejected the assessment by US health officials who said it was inevitable that the virus would spread more broadly in the United States.
The infection, which originated in the Chinese city of Wuhan in Hubei province in late December, has spread to over 70 countries. In total, more than 98,000 people have been infected worldwide, with the death toll reaching 3,400.
Dr. Francis Boyle joins The Alex Jones Show to break down the pandemic America is going to face as coronavirus spreads.


newswars--2020-03-06--‘Come and Take It’: Congressman Challenges Biden and Beto to Confiscate His AR-15

Congressman Ken Buck ( R-CO ) threw down the gauntlet Friday , challenging Democrat presidential frontrunner Joe Biden and notorious anti-gunner Beto O ’ Rourke to come take his firearm .
“ I have a message for Joe Biden and Beto O ’ Rourke .
If you wan na take everyone ’ s AR-15 in America why don ’ t you swing by my office in Washington DC and start with this one ?
” Congressman Buck asks .
“ Come and take it , ” he adds , grabbing an AR-15 mounted on the wall with an American flag @ @ @ @ @ @ @ comes as Biden declared he would appoint O ’ Rourke to be in charge of “ taking care of the gun problem.
” “ I want to make something clear — I ’ m gon na guarantee you , this is not the last you ’ re seeing of this guy , ” Biden said , referring to Beto .
“ You ’ re gon na take care of the gun problem with me , you ’ re gon na be the one who leads this effort .
I ’ m counting on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you , we need you badly.
” O ’ Rourke infamously destroyed his campaign during a Democrat debate last September when he responded to a question by going on an anti-gun rant in which he admitted , “ Hell , yes , we ’ re going to take your AR-15 , your AK-47 .
We ’ re not going to allow it to be used against your fellow Americans anymore.
” Alex Jones breaks down the video of Joe Biden pledging to enlist the help of Beto O ’ Rourke for gun confiscation @ @ @ @

Congressman Ken Buck (R-CO) threw down the gauntlet Friday, challenging Democrat presidential frontrunner Joe Biden and notorious anti-gunner Beto O’Rourke to come take his firearm.
“I have a message for Joe Biden and Beto O’Rourke. If you wanna take everyone’s AR-15 in America why don’t you swing by my office in Washington DC and start with this one?” Congressman Buck asks.
“Come and take it,” he adds, grabbing an AR-15 mounted on the wall with an American flag pattern.
Congressman Buck’s message comes as Biden declared he would appoint O’Rourke to be in charge of “taking care of the gun problem.”
“I want to make something clear — I’m gonna guarantee you, this is not the last you’re seeing of this guy,” Biden said, referring to Beto. “You’re gonna take care of the gun problem with me, you’re gonna be the one who leads this effort. I’m counting on you, I’m counting on you, we need you badly.”
O’Rourke infamously destroyed his campaign during a Democrat debate last September when he responded to a question by going on an anti-gun rant in which he admitted, “Hell, yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47. We’re not going to allow it to be used against your fellow Americans anymore.”
Follow the author on Gab: https://gab.ai/adansalazar
On Twitter: Follow @AdanSalazarWins
On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/adan.salazar.735
On Minds: https://www.minds.com/adan_infowars
Alex Jones breaks down the video of Joe Biden pledging to enlist the help of Beto O’Rourke for gun confiscation in his administration.


newswars--2020-03-06--Dow Drops 2.6% on Opening, Ignoring Good US Job Data – Reports

US President Donald Trump has stated that he thinks the financial markets will bounce back , but also that the Federal Reserve should cut interest rates again .
The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 664.07 points , or 2.54 % , at the open to 25,457.21 .
The S & P 500 opened 69.74 points down , or 2.31 % , at 2,954.20 .
The Nasdaq Composite fell 269.58 points , or 3.08 % , to 8,469.02 at the opening bell .
The Brent crude oil rate fell below $ 48 per barrel ( 46.75 dlr/barrel ) for the first @ @ @ @ @ @ @ showed .
As of 10:50 GMT , the price of May futures for North Sea Brent crude oil dropped by 4.58 percent , to $ 47.7 per barrel .
The value of April futures for WTI crude oil decreased by 4.27 percent , to $ 43.94 per barrel .
Notably , moments earlier , the price for both Brent and WTI fell by 5.6 percent .
Donald Trump earlier in the day commented on the US jobs data , praising the numbers .
“ Job numbers are incredible ” , the US president @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the US economy added 273,000 new jobs in February after an equal increase in January .
But “ the Fed should cut and the Fed should stimulate ” , Trump told reporters as he signed a bill providing $ 8.3 billion to tackle the coronavirus .
US stocks tumbled about three percent on 5 March after the state of California declared an emergency over the novel coronavirus , while health authorities across the United States are working to contain the outbreak in the world ’ s largest economy .
A total of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the novel strain of the coronavirus , while more than 100 others in the United States have been infected .
Mike Adams joins The Alex Jones Show to break down the news of a national emergency in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic .

US President Donald Trump has stated that he thinks the financial markets will bounce back, but also that the Federal Reserve should cut interest rates again.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 664.07 points, or 2.54%, at the open to 25,457.21.
The S&P 500 opened 69.74 points down, or 2.31%, at 2,954.20. The Nasdaq Composite fell 269.58 points, or 3.08%, to 8,469.02 at the opening bell.
The Brent crude oil rate fell below $48 per barrel (46.75 dlr/barrel) for the first time since July 2017, price charts showed.
As of 10:50 GMT, the price of May futures for North Sea Brent crude oil dropped by 4.58 percent, to $47.7 per barrel. The value of April futures for WTI crude oil decreased by 4.27 percent, to $43.94 per barrel.
Notably, moments earlier, the price for both Brent and WTI fell by 5.6 percent.
Donald Trump earlier in the day commented on the US jobs data, praising the numbers.
“Job numbers are incredible”, the US president stated after new Labour Department data revealed that the US economy added 273,000 new jobs in February after an equal increase in January.
But “the Fed should cut and the Fed should stimulate”, Trump told reporters as he signed a bill providing $8.3 billion to tackle the coronavirus.
US stocks tumbled about three percent on 5 March after the state of California declared an emergency over the novel coronavirus, while health authorities across the United States are working to contain the outbreak in the world’s largest economy.
A total of 11 Americans have died so far from the novel strain of the coronavirus, while more than 100 others in the United States have been infected.
Mike Adams joins The Alex Jones Show to break down the news of a national emergency in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic.


newswars--2020-03-06--“Blah Blah Math Blah Blah”: Wash Post Journalist Responds to Humiliating ‘$1 Million For Every Ameri

“Blah Blah Math Blah Blah”: Wash Post Journalist Responds to Humiliating ‘$1 Million For Every American’ Fail

The Washington Post journalist who was humiliated after claiming Mike Bloomberg ’ s $ 500 million ad spend could have been used to give every American $ 1 million dollars responded to the controversy by tweeting “ blah blah math blah blah.
” As we highlighted earlier , Mekita Rivas responded to Bloomberg dropping out of the presidential race by claiming that the money he spent on campaign commercials could have made every American a millionaire with lots of spare change .
With math obviously not being Rivas ’ strong point , it was immediately pointed out that Bloomberg ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all 327 million Americans would mean they get just $ 1.53 each .
That didn ’ t stop MSNBC ’ s Brian Williams and New York Times editorial board member Mara Gay repeating the claim as if it was accurate .
“ Actually with the money he spent he could have given every American a million dollars , ” said Gay incorrectly .
“ It ’ s an incredible way of putting it , ” responded Williams .
Instead of holding her hands up and taking the L , Rivas absurdly doubled down @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Rivas reacted to the farce by asserting , “ blah blah math blah blah people are telling me my numbers are wrong but the point still stands : he could easily afford to give everyone $ 1 million and literally never notice.
” She was swiftly corrected once again .
“ Oh my gosh .
@ MekitaRivas doubled down !
Wrong again , ” tweeted Terry Schilling .
“ One would need $ 327 trillion to give each American $ 1m .
Bloomberg is worth $ 65b , which equals around $ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ socialism is gaining traction because government schools suck at teaching basic math.
” Perhaps Rivas should de-activate her account and shut up for a while .
However , with the current state of journalism , she ’ s more likely to get a promotion from the Washington Post .
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever .
It is CRUCIAL that you support me .
Please sign up for the free newsletter here .
Donate to me on SubscribeStar here .

The Washington Post journalist who was humiliated after claiming Mike Bloomberg’s $500 million ad spend could have been used to give every American $1 million dollars responded to the controversy by tweeting “blah blah math blah blah.”
OK, then.
As we highlighted earlier, Mekita Rivas responded to Bloomberg dropping out of the presidential race by claiming that the money he spent on campaign commercials could have made every American a millionaire with lots of spare change.
With math obviously not being Rivas’ strong point, it was immediately pointed out that Bloomberg’s $500 million doled out to all 327 million Americans would mean they get just $1.53 each.
That didn’t stop MSNBC’s Brian Williams and New York Times editorial board member Mara Gay repeating the claim as if it was accurate.
“Actually with the money he spent he could have given every American a million dollars,” said Gay incorrectly.
This clip is just incredible. When he said “if you’re ahead of us on the math,” I thought he was about to correct the terrible math, but NO. pic.twitter.com/kAH3GDuPNl — Jessica Fletcher (@heckyessica) March 6, 2020
“It’s an incredible way of putting it,” responded Williams.
Instead of holding her hands up and taking the L, Rivas absurdly doubled down.
Oh my gosh. @MekitaRivas doubled down! Wrong again. One would need $327 trillion to give each American $1m. Bloomberg is worth $65b, which equals around $200 per American. This is why socialism is gaining traction because government schools suck at teaching basic math. pic.twitter.com/rao57kq69n — Terry Schilling (@Schilling1776) March 6, 2020
Tweeting from behind a locked account, Rivas reacted to the farce by asserting, “blah blah math blah blah people are telling me my numbers are wrong but the point still stands: he could easily afford to give everyone $1 million and literally never notice.”
She was swiftly corrected once again.
“Oh my gosh. @MekitaRivas doubled down! Wrong again,” tweeted Terry Schilling. “One would need $327 trillion to give each American $1m. Bloomberg is worth $65b, which equals around $200 per American. This is why socialism is gaining traction because government schools suck at teaching basic math.”
Perhaps Rivas should de-activate her account and shut up for a while.
However, with the current state of journalism, she’s more likely to get a promotion from the Washington Post.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me.
Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.
Support my sponsor – Emergency Survival Foods – delicious dishes & a 25 year shelf life!
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-03-06--Video: Mob of Teens Savagely Beat 15-year-old Girl in NY

Surveillance footage in New York City captured the moment a group of teens ganged up on and attacked a 15-year-old girl , stealing her shoes in the process .
The video taken from local shops was circulated on social media by the NYPD , who are asking for help identifying the attackers .
“ The girl was taken to a hospital in stable condition following the disturbing attack on Utica Avenue in Crown Heights Thursday , ” reports NBC New York .
An NYPD commanding officer shared the footage on Twitter , calling it an “ OUTRAGE.
” “ This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ old girl viciously attacked by a group of school children , ” he wrote .
“ One young man takes the sneakers right off the unconscious victim ’ s feet .
The teenager is in the hospital recovering .
We CAN NOT allow this behavior in our community.
” Anyone with information on the brazen daytime beating is encouraged to call Crime Stoppers at 1-800-577-TIPS .
Alex Jones breaks down how gangster ‘ thug ’ rap culture was designed and disseminated by the Central Intelligence Agency to break up the black American family @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and create a toxic culture that they could then pretend to save the U.S. citizenry from .

Surveillance footage in New York City captured the moment a group of teens ganged up on and attacked a 15-year-old girl, stealing her shoes in the process.
The video taken from local shops was circulated on social media by the NYPD, who are asking for help identifying the attackers.
OUTRAGE:this is sickening video of a 15 year old girl viciously attacked by a group of school children. One young man takes the sneakers right off the unconscious victim’s feet. The teenager is in the hospital recovering. We CAN NOT allow this behavior in our community. #Speakup pic.twitter.com/VLLb91fDOM — NYPDBrooklynNorth (@NYPDBklynNorth) March 6, 2020 Visit our store now before the sale ends!
“The girl was taken to a hospital in stable condition following the disturbing attack on Utica Avenue in Crown Heights Thursday,” reports NBC New York.
An NYPD commanding officer shared the footage on Twitter, calling it an “OUTRAGE.”
“This is sickening video of a 15 year old girl viciously attacked by a group of school children,” he wrote. “One young man takes the sneakers right off the unconscious victim’s feet. The teenager is in the hospital recovering. We CAN NOT allow this behavior in our community.”
Anyone with information on the brazen daytime beating is encouraged to call Crime Stoppers at 1-800-577-TIPS.
Alex Jones breaks down how gangster ‘thug’ rap culture was designed and disseminated by the Central Intelligence Agency to break up the black American family, corrupt the minds of young people, and create a toxic culture that they could then pretend to save the U.S. citizenry from.