newswars--2020-04-03--Watch Live: Coronavirus Home School Special & Ask The Experts!

Owen Shroyer hosts this special LIVE “ Coronavirus Home School ” call-in edition of War Room , where parents can @ @ @ @ @ roles as home school teachers after schools across the country have cancelled the semester over @ @ @ @ @ , Kari Donovan , Tracy Shannon , and CJ Pearson also join the War Room @ @ @ @ @ CT. Also catch the streams at infowars.com/show and Banned.video .
Make sure to follow Owen @ @ @ @ @ doctors & scientists confirm 5G weakens the immune system to all viruses including Covid-19 Tune @ @ @ @ @ this link as we uncover how a top scientist revealed that 5G can weaken the @ @ @ @ @ : Share this censored transmission while you still can On this Friday edition of The @ @ @ @ @ ll examine the death of the Constitution happening before our eyes .
From medical tyranny @ @ @ @ @ worse to the First , Second , and Fourth Amendments being totally abused , our @ @ @ @ @

Owen Shroyer hosts this special LIVE “Coronavirus Home School” call-in edition of War Room, where parents can sound off on their new roles as home school teachers after schools across the country have cancelled the semester over coronavirus fears. Savannah Hernandez, Kari Donovan, Tracy Shannon, and CJ Pearson also join the War Room, transmitting weekdays from 3-6PM CT.
Also catch the streams at infowars.com/show and Banned.video.
Make sure to follow Owen on Tik Tok:
Emergency 5G News Briefing! Secret Rollout of 5G Systems Nationwide Confirmed
Prestigious doctors & scientists confirm 5G weakens the immune system to all viruses including Covid-19
Tune in now and please spread this link as we uncover how a top scientist revealed that 5G can weaken the population’s immune system:
David Knight Show – America 2020: Medical Tyranny, Martial Law… The Year Freedom Died
Share this censored transmission while you still can
On this Friday edition of The David Knight Show we’ll examine the death of the Constitution happening before our eyes.
From medical tyranny running rampant and only getting worse to the First, Second, and Fourth Amendments being totally abused, our rights are in danger.


newswars--2020-04-03--Snap: Woman Cuts Line at Deli, Slaps Customer Who Confronts For Violating “Social Distancing”

Police in Pennsylvania are searching for a woman who cut in line at a deli , then assaulted a customer @ @ @ @ @ .
After cutting in line at the Shady Maple Farm Market in East Earl Township @ @ @ @ @ the woman allegedly began to accuse customers around her of violating social distancing practices .
@ @ @ @ @ customer , police say the suspect slapped the other customer and quickly left the store @ @ @ @ @ Police are asking for help identifying the woman in the photo , last seen leaving @ @ @ @ @ Volvo station wagon .
Unfortunately , it ’ s likely incidents like this will become @ @ @ @ @ governments ramp up hysteria over the coronavirus pandemic .
VIDEO : Americans Being Forced To @ @ @ @ @ Martial Law Is Here

Police in Pennsylvania are searching for a woman who cut in line at a deli, then assaulted a customer for violating social distancing guidelines.
After cutting in line at the Shady Maple Farm Market in East Earl Township around 8:30AM April 2, the woman allegedly began to accuse customers around her of violating social distancing practices.
“When confronted by a customer, police say the suspect slapped the other customer and quickly left the store,” reports Local21news.com.
Police are asking for help identifying the woman in the photo, last seen leaving the store in a silver Volvo station wagon.
Unfortunately, it’s likely incidents like this will become all-too-common as the media and governments ramp up hysteria over the coronavirus pandemic.
VIDEO: Americans Being Forced To Take COVID Test, Medical Martial Law Is Here


newswars--2020-04-03--Half a Million Chinese People Entered America at the Height of the Coronavirus Outbreak

Around half a million Chinese people , some of them infected with coronavirus , entered America from December to February at the height of the COVID-19 outbreak , new figures show .
The numbers , which were obtained from Commerce Department and U.S. Customs and Border Protection records , were compiled by ABC News .
They show that in the three month period when coronavirus was raging across China , 759,493 people entered the U.S. from China .
This number included 228,000 Americans who were returning home , meaning that roughly half a million were Chinese citizens or people living @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for tourism , business or to see family .
This number of people were pouring into the U.S. while the World Health Organization was simultaneously insisting that no country should enforce any kind of border controls to stop the spread of the virus .
President Donald Trump restricted travel from China from February 2nd onwards , but that was too little too late because the outbreak ( which was subsequently covered up by China for two months ) had started in Wuhan in November , according to Johns Hopkins University .
According to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ resident at the Mayo Clinic , out of the total figure arriving in the U.S. from China , “ a large number might have been infected at the time of travel.
” The numbers illustrate “ how globalized our world has become , ” he added .
However , infectious disease specialist Dr. Simone Wildes suggested that the virus outbreak was the price of globalization and that Americans would just have to get used to it .
“ It shows that globalization is here , and we have to be better prepared to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on all our lives in so many ways , ” he said .
The data also shows that “ From December , January and February on travelers entering the U.S. from eight of the hardest-hit countries : 343,402 arrived from Italy , 418,848 from Spain and about 1.9 million more came from Britain.
” As we document in the video below , while three quarters of a million people , some of them infected with coronavirus , were entering America , political leaders were telling Americans to go out and congregate in huge @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Year parades .
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever .
It is CRUCIAL that you support me .
Please sign up for the free newsletter here .
Donate to me on SubscribeStar here .
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown .

Around half a million Chinese people, some of them infected with coronavirus, entered America from December to February at the height of the COVID-19 outbreak, new figures show.
The numbers, which were obtained from Commerce Department and U.S. Customs and Border Protection records, were compiled by ABC News.
They show that in the three month period when coronavirus was raging across China, 759,493 people entered the U.S. from China.
This number included 228,000 Americans who were returning home, meaning that roughly half a million were Chinese citizens or people living in China who were visiting the U.S. for tourism, business or to see family.
This number of people were pouring into the U.S. while the World Health Organization was simultaneously insisting that no country should enforce any kind of border controls to stop the spread of the virus.
President Donald Trump restricted travel from China from February 2nd onwards, but that was too little too late because the outbreak (which was subsequently covered up by China for two months) had started in Wuhan in November, according to Johns Hopkins University.
According to Dr. Vinayak Kumar, an internal medicine resident at the Mayo Clinic, out of the total figure arriving in the U.S. from China, “a large number might have been infected at the time of travel.”
The numbers illustrate “how globalized our world has become,” he added.
However, infectious disease specialist Dr. Simone Wildes suggested that the virus outbreak was the price of globalization and that Americans would just have to get used to it.
“It shows that globalization is here, and we have to be better prepared to deal with the impact this will have on all our lives in so many ways,” he said.
The data also shows that “From December, January and February on travelers entering the U.S. from eight of the hardest-hit countries: 343,402 arrived from Italy, 418,848 from Spain and about 1.9 million more came from Britain.”
As we document in the video below, while three quarters of a million people, some of them infected with coronavirus, were entering America, political leaders were telling Americans to go out and congregate in huge crowds, including at Chinese Lunar New Year parades.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me.
Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-04-03--Coronavirus economic effects might last decades, research suggests

The economy could be suffering the effects of the coronavirus for decades , suggest economists at the University of California , Davis , who researched the financial effects of pandemics dating back to the 14th century .
“ If the trends play out similarly in the wake of COVID-19—adjusted to the scale of this pandemic—the global economic trajectory will be very different than was expected only a few weeks ago , ” the authors wrote in a working paper published this week .
“ Pandemics are followed by sustained periods—over multiple decades—of depressed investment opportunities.
” Òscar Jordà , Sanjay @ @ @ @ @ @ @ professors in the Department of Economics , concluded in their paper that the pandemic will likely depress real rates of return , lead to small increases in real wages and weigh on investment .
A real rate of return is an annual percentage of profit earned on an investment , adjusted for inflation .
The paper , “ Longer=Run Economic Consequences of Pandemics , ” was published online by the Financial Reserve Bank of San Francisco , where Jordà is a senior policy adviser .
The research was also reported on in Bloomberg.com @ @ @ @ @ @ @ studied macroeconomic responses to historic pandemic events , using data collected over many years by economic historians , and measured economic performance at annual frequency in cities , regions and countries from the 14th century to the present .
The economists looked at 12 major pandemics where more than 100,000 people died .
They also looked at armed conflicts that killed comparable amounts of people .
“ Significant macroeconomic after-effects of the pandemics persist for about 40 years , with real rates of return substantially depressed .
In contrast , we find that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the opposite , ” the authors said in their paper .
They said pandemics typically are followed by depressed investment opportunities , possibly because of heightened desires to save , possibly due to an increase in precautionary saving , or because people are trying to rebuild depleted wealth .
Following a pandemic , the natural rate of interest declines for decades thereafter , reaching its lowest point about 20 years later , researchers said .
About four decades later , the natural rate returns to the level that would be expected had the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rate of interest is an interest rate that supports the economy at full employment and maximum output while keeping inflation constant .
The major caveat identified by the economists is that past pandemics occurred at a time when people did not survive to old age .
“ The Black Death and other plagues hit populations with the great mass of the age pyramid below 60 , so this time may be different , ” they said .

The economy could be suffering the effects of the coronavirus for decades, suggest economists at the University of California, Davis, who researched the financial effects of pandemics dating back to the 14th century.
“If the trends play out similarly in the wake of COVID-19—adjusted to the scale of this pandemic—the global economic trajectory will be very different than was expected only a few weeks ago,” the authors wrote in a working paper published this week. “Pandemics are followed by sustained periods—over multiple decades—of depressed investment opportunities.”
Òscar Jordà, Sanjay Singh and Alan M. Taylor, all professors in the Department of Economics, concluded in their paper that the pandemic will likely depress real rates of return, lead to small increases in real wages and weigh on investment. A real rate of return is an annual percentage of profit earned on an investment, adjusted for inflation.
The paper, “Longer=Run Economic Consequences of Pandemics,” was published online by the Financial Reserve Bank of San Francisco, where Jordà is a senior policy adviser. The research was also reported on in Bloomberg.com and in other media.
The researchers studied macroeconomic responses to historic pandemic events, using data collected over many years by economic historians, and measured economic performance at annual frequency in cities, regions and countries from the 14th century to the present.
The economists looked at 12 major pandemics where more than 100,000 people died. They also looked at armed conflicts that killed comparable amounts of people.
“Significant macroeconomic after-effects of the pandemics persist for about 40 years, with real rates of return substantially depressed. In contrast, we find that wars have no such effect, indeed the opposite,” the authors said in their paper.
They said pandemics typically are followed by depressed investment opportunities, possibly because of heightened desires to save, possibly due to an increase in precautionary saving, or because people are trying to rebuild depleted wealth.
Following a pandemic, the natural rate of interest declines for decades thereafter, reaching its lowest point about 20 years later, researchers said. About four decades later, the natural rate returns to the level that would be expected had the pandemic not taken place. The natural rate of interest is an interest rate that supports the economy at full employment and maximum output while keeping inflation constant.
The major caveat identified by the economists is that past pandemics occurred at a time when people did not survive to old age. “The Black Death and other plagues hit populations with the great mass of the age pyramid below 60, so this time may be different,” they said.


newswars--2020-04-03--‘Worst pandemic in century’ will wipe out more than $4 TRILLION from global economy – Asian Developm

‘Worst pandemic in century’ will wipe out more than $4 TRILLION from global economy – Asian Development Bank

The global economy will see a much bigger hit from the coronavirus pandemic than previously expected , the Asian Development Bank ( ADB ) has warned in its annual report .
According to the gloomiest scenario presented by the bank , the impact of the “ worst pandemic in a century ” will be as high as $ 4.1 trillion , or 4.8 percent of global gross domestic product ( GDP ) .
However , even this forecast could turn out worse given the impact of the outbreak on global supply chains and how long it will take to contain @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could be an underestimate , as additional channels such as supply disruptions , interrupted remittances , possible social and financial crises , and long-term effects on health care and education are excluded from the analysis , ” reads the Asian Development Outlook ( ADO ) 2020 , the ADB ’ s annual economic report .
While the higher forecast reflects the spread of the infection to Europe , the US , and other major economies , on the low end , the global cost could be $ 2 trillion if demand shocks are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ says .
Even the best-case scenario indicates a sharp rise in estimated economic fallout from the coronavirus crisis .
An earlier report released by the lender on March 6 showed that the virus could cost the world around $ 347 billion in the worst-case scenario .
According to the latest outlook , regional economic growth in developing Asia will decline sharply this year amid the Covid-19 outbreak .
The report forecasts regional growth of 2.2 percent in 2020 , down more than three percent from earlier predictions .
However , growth is expected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in 2021 , if the world returns to normal .

The global economy will see a much bigger hit from the coronavirus pandemic than previously expected, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) has warned in its annual report.
According to the gloomiest scenario presented by the bank, the impact of the “worst pandemic in a century” will be as high as $4.1 trillion, or 4.8 percent of global gross domestic product (GDP). However, even this forecast could turn out worse given the impact of the outbreak on global supply chains and how long it will take to contain the virus.
“The estimated impact could be an underestimate, as additional channels such as supply disruptions, interrupted remittances, possible social and financial crises, and long-term effects on health care and education are excluded from the analysis,” reads the Asian Development Outlook (ADO) 2020, the ADB’s annual economic report.
While the higher forecast reflects the spread of the infection to Europe, the US, and other major economies, on the low end, the global cost could be $2 trillion if demand shocks are smaller and containment periods shorten, it says.
Even the best-case scenario indicates a sharp rise in estimated economic fallout from the coronavirus crisis. An earlier report released by the lender on March 6 showed that the virus could cost the world around $347 billion in the worst-case scenario.
According to the latest outlook, regional economic growth in developing Asia will decline sharply this year amid the Covid-19 outbreak. The report forecasts regional growth of 2.2 percent in 2020, down more than three percent from earlier predictions. However, growth is expected to rebound to more than six percent in 2021, if the world returns to normal.


newswars--2020-04-03--We need to cut around 10 mln barrels per day of oil production, Russia is ready to act with US on oi

We need to cut around 10 mln barrels per day of oil production, Russia is ready to act with US on oil markets – Putin

Russian President Vladimir Putin has said his country is ready to work with the Trump administration to halt the freefall of oil prices .
His comments come after a phone call with President Trump earlier this week .
Putin also noted that the daily oil output should be cut by around 10 million barrels , as there is lower demand due to coronavirus .
Oil prices went started dwindling after OPEC+ countries disagreed on production cuts , with Saudi Arabia refusing to lower the output .
With an ongoing “ price war ” between Russia and Saudi Arabia driving prices @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said on Thursday that “ it would be great ” if the two countries could make a deal to limit production .
Putin had already spoken to Trump by phone earlier this week , and on Friday announced that he is ready to cut production by 10 million barrels per day.The Russian leader said that moving forward , Moscow would be comfortable with a price of $ 42 per barrel , roughly $ 10-15 higher than current levels .
Oil prices jumped prior to Putin ’ s Friday announcement , after Trump spoke @ @ @ @ @ @ @ between Moscow and Riyadh have yet taken place , Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Friday .
However , non-OPEC member Azerbaijan announced that the petroleum bloc and its allies will hold discussions on Monday aimed at restoring “ balance to the oil market.
” Saudi Arabia , ramped up its production on Wednesday to a record high of more than 12 million barrels per day , after previous OPEC+ production cuts expired at the end of March .
During a televised meeting with Energy Minister Alexander Novak Putin said the Saudi crown @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shale oil producers out of business , among them the US and Russia .
Novak noted that he doesn ’ t know when the world ’ s plummeting demand for oil will finally bottom out .

Russian President Vladimir Putin has said his country is ready to work with the Trump administration to halt the freefall of oil prices. His comments come after a phone call with President Trump earlier this week.
Putin also noted that the daily oil output should be cut by around 10 million barrels, as there is lower demand due to coronavirus. Oil prices went started dwindling after OPEC+ countries disagreed on production cuts, with Saudi Arabia refusing to lower the output.
With an ongoing “price war” between Russia and Saudi Arabia driving prices even further down, US president Trump said on Thursday that “it would be great” if the two countries could make a deal to limit production.
Putin had already spoken to Trump by phone earlier this week, and on Friday announced that he is ready to cut production by 10 million barrels per day.The Russian leader said that moving forward, Moscow would be comfortable with a price of $42 per barrel, roughly $10-15 higher than current levels.
Oil prices jumped prior to Putin’s Friday announcement, after Trump spoke of a pending deal.
No talks between Moscow and Riyadh have yet taken place, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Friday. However, non-OPEC member Azerbaijan announced that the petroleum bloc and its allies will hold discussions on Monday aimed at restoring “balance to the oil market.”
Saudi Arabia, ramped up its production on Wednesday to a record high of more than 12 million barrels per day, after previous OPEC+ production cuts expired at the end of March. During a televised meeting with Energy Minister Alexander Novak Putin said the Saudi crown is flooding the market to force competing shale oil producers out of business, among them the US and Russia.
Novak noted that he doesn’t know when the world’s plummeting demand for oil will finally bottom out.


newswars--2020-04-03--Capital Accumulation: The Way to Increase Wages

It is clear that arbitrary minimum wage laws are not only ineffective , but actually detrimental to real wage growth .
So what type of action results in increasing wages in the United States , or any country for that matter ?
The only way to raise real wages is to increase the per capita amount of capital invested by increasing capital accumulation .
To accomplish this it is first important to understand what is meant by capital accumulation .
Capital accumulation , as explained by Ludwig von Mises , is wealth that is created and owned by businesses and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and reinvested to create further profit .
The capital which is accumulated is encompassed in everything that businesses utilize , from tools to vehicles to buildings and everything in between .
Both individuals and businesses create further profit by loaning out excess wealth ( either through direct investment or by holding money in traditional savings accounts ) .
It is important to note that this accumulation can only occur when more wealth is created and saved than is consumed .
It is critical to reject the commonly held belief that the relationship between @ @ @ @ @ @ @ zero-sum .
It is fallacious to assume that the wealthy getting richer makes the poor worse off .
Instead , this wealth creation makes everybody better off !
The standard of living in the United Sates is higher than in all but a few other countries in the world not because US politicians are smarter than their foreign counterparts , but instead because of the high per head quota of capital that is invested .
This high level of investment has allowed businesses to use the most efficient tools available through capital investments @ @ @ @ @ @ @ workers are so productive .
People in other countries do not lack the intelligence to grow , but suffer from inadequate capital needed to drive higher efficiencies , which lead to increasing production yields .
As the accumulation of capital becomes greater , wages will rise as businesses compete for the most skilled workers .
Only through these market processes can wages increase for everyone rather than for the lucky few who benefit from minimum wage laws .
The best way for government to encourage capital accumulation is to resist intervening in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ money supply through the federal funds rate or monetary policy sends the wrong signals to businesses .
As the interest rate artificially drops and encourages borrowing , individuals will save less and businesses will take on projects they would not have pursued otherwise .
These malinvestments , as Mises calls them , are the direct result of government intervention and are detrimental to the accumulation of capital .
Examples of malinvestment are present all over the world , from the United States housing bubble to unfinished skyscrapers such as the Nakheel Tower in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ accumulation is lowering tax rates , particularly for corporations and wealthy individuals .
Although this may be counterintuitive to some who think that it is the government ’ s role to redistribute excess wealth to help the common man , this is not the case .
In Planning for Freedom : Let the Market System Work , Mises writes : The only way to do away with poverty they know is to take away—by means of progressive taxation—as much as possible from the well-to-do .
In their eyes the wealth of the rich @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the poor .
In accordance with this idea the fiscal policies of all nations and especially also of the United States were in the last decades directed toward confiscating ever-increasing portions of the wealth and income of the higher brackets .
The greater part of the funds thus collected would have been employed by the tax-payers for saving and additional capital accumulation .
Their investment would have increased productivity per man-hour and would in this way have provided more goods for consumption .
It would have raised the average standard of living of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them for current expenditure , they are dissipated and capital accumulation is concomitantly slowed down .
The taxpayers or businesses are able to save and invest more if they are taxed less , or not at all .
Although this does make them more wealthy , it does not make the common man more poor .
Instead , from a material perspective everybody prospers .
By allowing wealth accumulation , resources are enabled to flow into their most efficient uses , dictated by consumer demand instead of by bureaucrats deciding how to transfer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ increase production and the standard of living is to promote wealth creation and saving by allowing savers and entrepreneurs to save and invest , unfettered by interventionist policy .
A laissez-faire approach does not strictly favor the wealthy capitalist , but also the interests of the common man .

It is clear that arbitrary minimum wage laws are not only ineffective, but actually detrimental to real wage growth.
So what type of action results in increasing wages in the United States, or any country for that matter? The only way to raise real wages is to increase the per capita amount of capital invested by increasing capital accumulation. To accomplish this it is first important to understand what is meant by capital accumulation.
Capital accumulation, as explained by Ludwig von Mises, is wealth that is created and owned by businesses and individuals. This wealth is both saved and reinvested to create further profit. The capital which is accumulated is encompassed in everything that businesses utilize, from tools to vehicles to buildings and everything in between. Both individuals and businesses create further profit by loaning out excess wealth (either through direct investment or by holding money in traditional savings accounts). It is important to note that this accumulation can only occur when more wealth is created and saved than is consumed.
It is critical to reject the commonly held belief that the relationship between wealth and the creation of wealth is zero-sum. It is fallacious to assume that the wealthy getting richer makes the poor worse off. Instead, this wealth creation makes everybody better off! The standard of living in the United Sates is higher than in all but a few other countries in the world not because US politicians are smarter than their foreign counterparts, but instead because of the high per head quota of capital that is invested. This high level of investment has allowed businesses to use the most efficient tools available through capital investments, and this is why United States workers are so productive. People in other countries do not lack the intelligence to grow, but suffer from inadequate capital needed to drive higher efficiencies, which lead to increasing production yields. As the accumulation of capital becomes greater, wages will rise as businesses compete for the most skilled workers. Only through these market processes can wages increase for everyone rather than for the lucky few who benefit from minimum wage laws.
The best way for government to encourage capital accumulation is to resist intervening in the marketplace. Manipulating interest rates and the money supply through the federal funds rate or monetary policy sends the wrong signals to businesses. As the interest rate artificially drops and encourages borrowing, individuals will save less and businesses will take on projects they would not have pursued otherwise. These malinvestments, as Mises calls them, are the direct result of government intervention and are detrimental to the accumulation of capital. Examples of malinvestment are present all over the world, from the United States housing bubble to unfinished skyscrapers such as the Nakheel Tower in Dubai.
Another way to encourage capital accumulation is lowering tax rates, particularly for corporations and wealthy individuals. Although this may be counterintuitive to some who think that it is the government’s role to redistribute excess wealth to help the common man, this is not the case. In Planning for Freedom: Let the Market System Work, Mises writes:
The only way to do away with poverty they know is to take away—by means of progressive taxation—as much as possible from the well-to-do. In their eyes the wealth of the rich is the cause of the poverty of the poor. In accordance with this idea the fiscal policies of all nations and especially also of the United States were in the last decades directed toward confiscating ever-increasing portions of the wealth and income of the higher brackets. The greater part of the funds thus collected would have been employed by the tax-payers for saving and additional capital accumulation. Their investment would have increased productivity per man-hour and would in this way have provided more goods for consumption. It would have raised the average standard of living of common man. If the government spends them for current expenditure, they are dissipated and capital accumulation is concomitantly slowed down.
The taxpayers or businesses are able to save and invest more if they are taxed less, or not at all. Although this does make them more wealthy, it does not make the common man more poor. Instead, from a material perspective everybody prospers. By allowing wealth accumulation, resources are enabled to flow into their most efficient uses, dictated by consumer demand instead of by bureaucrats deciding how to transfer money.
The most effective way to increase production and the standard of living is to promote wealth creation and saving by allowing savers and entrepreneurs to save and invest, unfettered by interventionist policy. A laissez-faire approach does not strictly favor the wealthy capitalist, but also the interests of the common man.


newswars--2020-04-03--The Fed Is Running Out of Bubbles to Create

The Fed came out with a series of unprecedented measures on March 22 , 2020 .
They announced the Fed will buy an unlimited amount of Treasurys and mortgage-backed securities ( MBS ) , or as Peter Schiff refers to it , “ QE infinity.
” This has been very positively welcomed by many in the mainstream media and by businesses .
Yet , what many are ignoring is that the Fed has to do this to keep the bubbles that it has created going .
Recently , I wrote that the Fed has created many structural problems in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the car loan market .
These issues have only been “ waiting ” for such a situation to come to the surface and severely hurt the economy .
After the recession of 2001 the Fed decreased interest rates substantially , and this along with other government policy led to the housing bubble that burst in 2007 .
Instead of allowing the market to adjust and get rid of the structural problems created by artificially low interest rates , the Fed decided that what they had to do was to reinflate the housing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of MBS to lower mortgage rates and reinflate the mortgage market .
This was largely unsuccessful until mid-2012 , but then house prices began to rise faster as the economy became more stable .
As can be seen from the graph below , house prices have increased by about 50 percent since then and are now at an all-time high .
The graph above may show that the Fed was successful in inflating another housing bubble , yet prices alone do not reveal the whole picture .
In the graph below , I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ debts .
The red line represents mortgage debt as a percent of GDP , and as it is clear from the graph as a percent of GDP , mortgage debt is decreasing .
In fact , it has already decreased by about 20 percent since its all-time high .
This shows the Fed was less successful in recreating the housing bubble of the early 2000s .
This is not to say that the housing market is not in a bubble , but the bubble is not in the levels it was last time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ successful in using the housing market to create artificial economic growth .
Yet , the Fed ’ s actions have led to many issues in the mortgage markets .
These issues had the president of Ginnie Mae very worried as early as 2015 .
Here is what he said in his remarks at the Ginnie Mae Summit at the time : Also , we have depended on sheer luck .
Luck that the economy does not fall into recession and increase mortgage delinquencies .
Luck that our independent mortgage bankers remain able to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ luck that nothing critical falls through the cracks .
As the graph above shows the only private sector debt that the Fed was able to substantially increase , as a percentage of GDP , was the corporate debt .
Corporate debt has increased by about 67 percent since the end of the Great Recession , from about $ 6 trillion to $ 10 trillion in just ten years .
This has led to an increase of the corporate debt-to-GDP ratio by about 6 percent , to an all-time high of 46 percent .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ this debt has been deteriorating .
Nearly half of the $ 4 trillion that was added postrecession are BBB rate bonds , or the lowest ratings of investment-grade bonds trench .
Corporations are not alone in this .
All other businesses have now accumulated about $ 5.5 trillion in debt too , bringing the total debt of all businesses ( nonfinancial debt only ) to about $ 15.5 trillion .
This makes percentage of total debt to GDP about 74 percent , which is higher than the mortgage debt-to-GDP ratio at its highest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about 73 percent .
Hence , this time around the Fed has been more successful in fueling a business debt bubble .
Will the Fed Be Able to Fuel Another Bubble ?
As discussed above , the Fed replaced to a large degree the mortgage bubble with the corporate bubble .
But this happened because corporate debt and collateralized debt obligations ( CDOs ) did relatively well during the last recession .
This may not be the case in the recession that many say has already started .
In fact , this is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fed has responded to the current economic situation brought about by the COVID-19 epidemic .
The Fed now will be lending directly to corporations by using the Treasury to secure these loans .
They argue that this is due to the shock the economy is in because of COVID-19 , but what they are worried about is that the bubble they created is about to burst given the weakness in the corporate debt markets .
The Fed knows that the corporate debt market is not in a good shape , since this has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ here , here , and here for a few examples ) .
It remains to be seen whether they can stop this bubble from bursting or not , but if it does , and if what happened in the mortgage market after the last recessions can teach us anything , the business debt-to-GDP ratio will most likely decrease after the recession that we may be in already .
Before the Great Recession , we had the housing bubble fueled by the Fed .
Then , the Fed replaced the housing bubble with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ arises is : what will be the next bubble if the business debt bubble bursts ?
Looking at the graph above , the only other major debt category left that is big enough to play a role in the economy is government debt .
The national debt-to-GDP ratio increased by about 40 percent during the last recession .
However , since about 2013 the government debt-to-GDP ratio has stabilized somewhat , but now with the CARES Act ( Coronavirus Aid , Relief , and Economic Security Act ) , some estimates place the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 4 trillion .
This will lead to at least an 18 percent increase in the government debt-to-GDP ratio in one year alone .
It seems the Fed ’ s last hope in fueling the next recovery will be government debt .
In fact , the Fed has played a major role in the government debt increase , but now they are doing this at another level .
Jim Bianco in an article at Bloomberg recently wrote that the Fed ’ s plan “ includes a hard-to-understand $ 625 billion of bond-buying a week @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Fed will own two-thirds of the Treasury market in a year.
” Hence , it is clear the Fed , intentionally or not , is going to make the government debt bubble worse than it is .
The Fed-fueled economy is unstable , and as the Austrian theory of the business cycle teaches us , sooner or later is bound to suffer from recessions .
With each passing recession , the Fed finds it harder to refuel the last bubble , but the market moves on to the new bubble , as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The problem the Fed is facing now is that since the last recession they have been unable to fuel good economic growth with artificially low interest rates , since GDP increased at about 1 percent below the post-World War II average of 3.2 percent .
This may be because even with artificially low interest rates total debt has decreased as a percentage of GDP , as the graph below shows .
If this trend continues , the Fed will find it even harder to fuel economic growth by lowering interest rates .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ are they willing to go to keep the bubble economy going ?
Jim Bianco seems to be worried about what they are doing .
He closed the article mentioned above by saying : “ Fed Chair Jerome Powell needs to tread carefully indeed to ensure his cure isn ’ t worse than the disease.
” Only time will tell what the results of the Fed ’ s actions will be , but it sure seems like they will not find it easy to fuel another private debt bubble .
With only government debt @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have reached its limits in affecting the economy via interest rate manipulation .

The Fed came out with a series of unprecedented measures on March 22, 2020. They announced the Fed will buy an unlimited amount of Treasurys and mortgage-backed securities (MBS), or as Peter Schiff refers to it, “QE infinity.” This has been very positively welcomed by many in the mainstream media and by businesses. Yet, what many are ignoring is that the Fed has to do this to keep the bubbles that it has created going. Recently, I wrote that the Fed has created many structural problems in the mortgage market, corporate bond market, and the car loan market. These issues have only been “waiting” for such a situation to come to the surface and severely hurt the economy.
Reinflating the Mortgage Bubble
After the recession of 2001 the Fed decreased interest rates substantially, and this along with other government policy led to the housing bubble that burst in 2007. Instead of allowing the market to adjust and get rid of the structural problems created by artificially low interest rates, the Fed decided that what they had to do was to reinflate the housing bubble. The Fed bought massive amounts of MBS to lower mortgage rates and reinflate the mortgage market. This was largely unsuccessful until mid-2012, but then house prices began to rise faster as the economy became more stable. As can be seen from the graph below, house prices have increased by about 50 percent since then and are now at an all-time high.
The graph above may show that the Fed was successful in inflating another housing bubble, yet prices alone do not reveal the whole picture. In the graph below, I show debt-to-GDP ratios for a variety of debts. The red line represents mortgage debt as a percent of GDP, and as it is clear from the graph as a percent of GDP, mortgage debt is decreasing. In fact, it has already decreased by about 20 percent since its all-time high. This shows the Fed was less successful in recreating the housing bubble of the early 2000s.
This is not to say that the housing market is not in a bubble, but the bubble is not in the levels it was last time. Hence, the Fed was less successful in using the housing market to create artificial economic growth. Yet, the Fed’s actions have led to many issues in the mortgage markets. These issues had the president of Ginnie Mae very worried as early as 2015. Here is what he said in his remarks at the Ginnie Mae Summit at the time:
Also, we have depended on sheer luck. Luck that the economy does not fall into recession and increase mortgage delinquencies. Luck that our independent mortgage bankers remain able to access their lines of credit. And luck that nothing critical falls through the cracks.
A New Bubble Post–Great Recession
As the graph above shows the only private sector debt that the Fed was able to substantially increase, as a percentage of GDP, was the corporate debt. Corporate debt has increased by about 67 percent since the end of the Great Recession, from about $6 trillion to $10 trillion in just ten years. This has led to an increase of the corporate debt-to-GDP ratio by about 6 percent, to an all-time high of 46 percent. What is more, the quality of this debt has been deteriorating. Nearly half of the $4 trillion that was added postrecession are BBB rate bonds, or the lowest ratings of investment-grade bonds trench.
Corporations are not alone in this. All other businesses have now accumulated about $5.5 trillion in debt too, bringing the total debt of all businesses (nonfinancial debt only) to about $15.5 trillion. This makes percentage of total debt to GDP about 74 percent, which is higher than the mortgage debt-to-GDP ratio at its highest point in 2009, when it was about 73 percent. Hence, this time around the Fed has been more successful in fueling a business debt bubble.
Will the Fed Be Able to Fuel Another Bubble?
As discussed above, the Fed replaced to a large degree the mortgage bubble with the corporate bubble. But this happened because corporate debt and collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) did relatively well during the last recession. This may not be the case in the recession that many say has already started. In fact, this is very clear when one considers how the Fed has responded to the current economic situation brought about by the COVID-19 epidemic. The Fed now will be lending directly to corporations by using the Treasury to secure these loans. They argue that this is due to the shock the economy is in because of COVID-19, but what they are worried about is that the bubble they created is about to burst given the weakness in the corporate debt markets. The Fed knows that the corporate debt market is not in a good shape, since this has now become clear to many (see here, here, and here for a few examples). It remains to be seen whether they can stop this bubble from bursting or not, but if it does, and if what happened in the mortgage market after the last recessions can teach us anything, the business debt-to-GDP ratio will most likely decrease after the recession that we may be in already.
Before the Great Recession, we had the housing bubble fueled by the Fed. Then, the Fed replaced the housing bubble with the business debt bubble. The question that arises is: what will be the next bubble if the business debt bubble bursts? Looking at the graph above, the only other major debt category left that is big enough to play a role in the economy is government debt. The national debt-to-GDP ratio increased by about 40 percent during the last recession. However, since about 2013 the government debt-to-GDP ratio has stabilized somewhat, but now with the CARES Act (Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act), some estimates place the deficit for 2020 alone will be $4 trillion. This will lead to at least an 18 percent increase in the government debt-to-GDP ratio in one year alone.
It seems the Fed’s last hope in fueling the next recovery will be government debt. In fact, the Fed has played a major role in the government debt increase, but now they are doing this at another level. Jim Bianco in an article at Bloomberg recently wrote that the Fed’s plan “includes a hard-to-understand $625 billion of bond-buying a week going forward. At this rate, the Fed will own two-thirds of the Treasury market in a year.” Hence, it is clear the Fed, intentionally or not, is going to make the government debt bubble worse than it is.
Conclusion
The Fed-fueled economy is unstable, and as the Austrian theory of the business cycle teaches us, sooner or later is bound to suffer from recessions. With each passing recession, the Fed finds it harder to refuel the last bubble, but the market moves on to the new bubble, as the Fed keeps interest rates artificially low. The problem the Fed is facing now is that since the last recession they have been unable to fuel good economic growth with artificially low interest rates, since GDP increased at about 1 percent below the post-World War II average of 3.2 percent. This may be because even with artificially low interest rates total debt has decreased as a percentage of GDP, as the graph below shows.
If this trend continues, the Fed will find it even harder to fuel economic growth by lowering interest rates. The problem here is: how far are they willing to go to keep the bubble economy going? Jim Bianco seems to be worried about what they are doing. He closed the article mentioned above by saying: “Fed Chair Jerome Powell needs to tread carefully indeed to ensure his cure isn’t worse than the disease.” Only time will tell what the results of the Fed’s actions will be, but it sure seems like they will not find it easy to fuel another private debt bubble. With only government debt left to increase, the Fed may have reached its limits in affecting the economy via interest rate manipulation.


newswars--2020-04-03--WHO Director Was Top Member of Violent Ethiopian Communist Party

The Director-General of the World Health Organization is a former member of a violent revolutionary communist party in Ethiopia that denied emergency medical treatment to an ethnic group and he is accused of personally overseeing the extradition of dissidents who were later imprisoned and tortured .
As we have previously highlighted , Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has repeatedly parroted Chinese Communist Party talking points , constantly heaping praise on Beijing ’ s response to coronavirus despite the fact that China hid the truth about its spread and viciously silenced scientists and doctors who tried to warn the world .
Now we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in his excellent piece ‘ The Crimes of Tedros Adhanom ’ , during his time in Ethiopia , the WHO chief was a member of the Tigray People ’ s Liberation Front ( TPLF ) , a violent communist revolutionary party which was listed as a terrorist organization by the U.S. government in the 90 ’ s .
According to one Ethiopian newspaper , Adhanom was listed as the 3rd most important member of the politbureau standing committee in the TPLF .
Martin writes how the TPLF engaged in “ systematic discrimination and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ healthcare to the Amhara ethnic group because of their affiliation with the opposition party .
The Ministry of Health that oversaw these abuses was led at the time by Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus .
Birth rates were recorded to be significantly lower in the Amhara region compared to other regions and 2 million Amhara people “ disappeared ” from the subsequent population census .
As Tucker Carlson highlighted earlier this week , Adhanom “ got his job with Chinese support after he covered up cholera outbreaks in his home country ” of Egypt .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ centered around claims he had downplayed cholera epidemics in Ethiopia in 2006 , 2009 and 2011 by passing them off as “ acute watery diarrhea , ” a symptom of cholera .
“ International organisations were pressured not to call it Cholera ( despite the UN testing the infected and finding Cholera ) , and were pressured by government employees not to reveal the number of infected .
Another stunning victory for the health minister , ” writes Martin .
After he was appointed foreign minister of Ethiopia in 2012 , dissidents and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a brutal government crackdown , leading some to flee to exile in nearby Yemen .
Adhanom was personally responsible for negotiating the extradition of these dissidents back to Ethiopia , some of whom were subsequently imprisoned and tortured .
“ One such case was a British citizen Andy Tsege who was arrested at Sana ’ a airport and twice given a death sentence in Ethiopia , ” writes Martin .
“ This led to the involvement of the British government who threatened denial of aid to Ethiopia unless he be granted asylum .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ treated very well .
He even has a laptop , have you ever heard of a political prisoner with a laptop ?
” Andy of course , after his return to the UK told a somewhat different story of being tortured for days on end , alongside dozens of other prisoners.
” Dissidents being imprisoned and tortured ?
No wonder Adhanom is so effusive in his praise for China .
In 2016 , the Ethiopian government attempted to force relocate 15000 people in the Oromia region because it wanted to requisition their land @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by mass shootings and a stampede that killed 500 people according to Human Rights Watch .
The government then embarked on another brutal crackdown , arresting 70,000 people .
Adhanom subsequently tried to downplay the violence , falsely claiming the police weren ’ t armed and that the numbers weren ’ t as high as stated .
After ascending to his lofty position within the World Health Organization , Adhanom appointed mass murdering dictator Robert Mugabe to be a “ goodwill ambassador ” to the WHO while also defending Uhuru Kenyatta , under @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rigged elections .
“ Tedros of course takes every chance he can to praise the good governance of China , and given the human rights record of the People ’ s Republic , it ’ s no wonder he likes them so much , ” writes Martin .
“ From projects like media propaganda centres , mass relocations , and social credit style score cards , Ethiopia ’ s governance in many ways resembles a carbon copy of the Chinese authoritarian model .
Complete with a one party state and focus on profit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ aftermath of the coronavirus outbreak , the World Health Organization , under Adhanom ’ s direction , amplified Chinese fake news that there was no “ human to human ” transmission of COVID-19 as late as January 14th , despite this having already occurred in December .
The WHO and Adhanom also repeatedly demanded countries not impose border controls , exacerbating the spread of the disease , while appearing to be more concerned about political correctness and the “ stigmatization ” of Chinese people .
“ In a sane world , instead of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his cronies would be put on trial at the International Criminal Court , tried for his crimes , and if found guilty , should spend the rest of his life in prison , ” concludes Martin .
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever .
It is CRUCIAL that you support me .
Please sign up for the free newsletter here .
Donate to me on SubscribeStar here .
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the @ @

The Director-General of the World Health Organization is a former member of a violent revolutionary communist party in Ethiopia that denied emergency medical treatment to an ethnic group and he is accused of personally overseeing the extradition of dissidents who were later imprisoned and tortured.
As we have previously highlighted, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has repeatedly parroted Chinese Communist Party talking points, constantly heaping praise on Beijing’s response to coronavirus despite the fact that China hid the truth about its spread and viciously silenced scientists and doctors who tried to warn the world.
Now we know why.
As John Martin explains in his excellent piece ‘The Crimes of Tedros Adhanom’, during his time in Ethiopia, the WHO chief was a member of the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF), a violent communist revolutionary party which was listed as a terrorist organization by the U.S. government in the 90’s.
According to one Ethiopian newspaper, Adhanom was listed as the 3rd most important member of the politbureau standing committee in the TPLF.
Martin writes how the TPLF engaged in “systematic discrimination and human rights abuses” by refusing emergency healthcare to the Amhara ethnic group because of their affiliation with the opposition party. The Ministry of Health that oversaw these abuses was led at the time by Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.
Birth rates were recorded to be significantly lower in the Amhara region compared to other regions and 2 million Amhara people “disappeared” from the subsequent population census.
As Tucker Carlson highlighted earlier this week, Adhanom “got his job with Chinese support after he covered up cholera outbreaks in his home country” of Egypt.
Tedros has denied the allegation, which centered around claims he had downplayed cholera epidemics in Ethiopia in 2006, 2009 and 2011 by passing them off as “acute watery diarrhea,” a symptom of cholera.
“International organisations were pressured not to call it Cholera (despite the UN testing the infected and finding Cholera), and were pressured by government employees not to reveal the number of infected. Another stunning victory for the health minister,” writes Martin.
After he was appointed foreign minister of Ethiopia in 2012, dissidents and journalists across the country were subjected to a brutal government crackdown, leading some to flee to exile in nearby Yemen.
Adhanom was personally responsible for negotiating the extradition of these dissidents back to Ethiopia, some of whom were subsequently imprisoned and tortured.
“One such case was a British citizen Andy Tsege who was arrested at Sana’a airport and twice given a death sentence in Ethiopia,” writes Martin. “This led to the involvement of the British government who threatened denial of aid to Ethiopia unless he be granted asylum. Tedros responded that Tsege was “being treated very well. He even has a laptop, have you ever heard of a political prisoner with a laptop?” Andy of course, after his return to the UK told a somewhat different story of being tortured for days on end, alongside dozens of other prisoners.”
Dissidents being imprisoned and tortured? No wonder Adhanom is so effusive in his praise for China.
It gets worse.
In 2016, the Ethiopian government attempted to force relocate 15000 people in the Oromia region because it wanted to requisition their land. This led to mass protests followed by mass shootings and a stampede that killed 500 people according to Human Rights Watch. The government then embarked on another brutal crackdown, arresting 70,000 people.
Adhanom subsequently tried to downplay the violence, falsely claiming the police weren’t armed and that the numbers weren’t as high as stated.
After ascending to his lofty position within the World Health Organization, Adhanom appointed mass murdering dictator Robert Mugabe to be a “goodwill ambassador” to the WHO while also defending Uhuru Kenyatta, under whose government 1,300 people were killed following rigged elections.
“Tedros of course takes every chance he can to praise the good governance of China, and given the human rights record of the People’s Republic, it’s no wonder he likes them so much,” writes Martin. “From projects like media propaganda centres, mass relocations, and social credit style score cards, Ethiopia’s governance in many ways resembles a carbon copy of the Chinese authoritarian model. Complete with a one party state and focus on profit over human rights.”
In the immediate aftermath of the coronavirus outbreak, the World Health Organization, under Adhanom’s direction, amplified Chinese fake news that there was no “human to human” transmission of COVID-19 as late as January 14th, despite this having already occurred in December.
The WHO and Adhanom also repeatedly demanded countries not impose border controls, exacerbating the spread of the disease, while appearing to be more concerned about political correctness and the “stigmatization” of Chinese people.
“In a sane world, instead of leading a global organisation, Tedros and his cronies would be put on trial at the International Criminal Court, tried for his crimes, and if found guilty, should spend the rest of his life in prison,” concludes Martin.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me.
Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-04-03--Russian Navy Getting Nuclear-Powered Attack Submarine

The Russian Navy will receive the first Borei-A class strategic nuclear-powered submarine , Knyaz Vladimir , this month , United @ @ @ @ @ said on Friday .
“ The vessel is on the water .
All of the @ @ @ @ @ have been taken into account and addressed , the ship is ready for the transfer @ @ @ @ @ hope that it will be held this month , April , ” Rakhmanov said .
@ @ @ @ @ receive the submarine back in December , but the delivery was postponed to 2020 over @ @ @ @ @ a 4th generation ballistic missile submarine ( SSBN ) , which carries up to 16 @ @ @ @ @ ( NATO reporting name SS-NX-30 ) with a flight range of up to 9,000 km @ @ @ @ @ .
The first Borei submarine , Knyaz Vladimir , was launched on 30 July 2012 @ @ @ @ @ attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin .
Alex Jones examines the parallels between the 2005 @ @ @ @ @ today ’ s Corona-virus pandemic .

The Russian Navy will receive the first Borei-A class strategic nuclear-powered submarine, Knyaz Vladimir, this month, United Shipbuilding Corporation President Alexey Rakhmanov said on Friday.
“The vessel is on the water. All of the Defence Ministry’s notes have been taken into account and addressed, the ship is ready for the transfer to the Navy. I hope that it will be held this month, April,” Rakhmanov said.
The navy was expected to receive the submarine back in December, but the delivery was postponed to 2020 over technical reasons.
Borei is a 4th generation ballistic missile submarine (SSBN), which carries up to 16 intercontinental ballistic missiles RSM-56 Bulava (NATO reporting name SS-NX-30) with a flight range of up to 9,000 km (around 5,600 miles).
The first Borei submarine, Knyaz Vladimir, was launched on 30 July 2012, during a solemn ceremony attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Alex Jones examines the parallels between the 2005 movie V for Vendetta and today’s Corona-virus pandemic.


newswars--2020-04-03--Candace Owens Plans To Run For Office: “I’ll Win. They Won’t Know What Hit Them.”

Conservative commentator Candace Owens says she could soon be starting a career in politics .
After criticizing governors of various states over their coronavirus responses , Owens – a strong supporter of President Donald Trump – announced in a tweet Thursday she ’ d come to the realization she needs to run for office .
“ I ’ m now honestly considering running for office , ” Owens tweeted .
“ Never had any desire to previously , but something changed in me last night.
” “ Had a conversation with my husband and I think it ’ s a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ host Glenn Beck Thursday , the founder of the BLEXIT movement admitted she ’ d realigned her thinking after growing frustrated in recent days with Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont and New York Governor Andrew Cuomo , whom she accuses of “ lying to extract money from the federal government because their socialist-run states are out of money.
” “ Watching the way these governors are lying and mismanaging , I ’ m getting sick of it , so I said to my husband , I think I should get into politics , I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ surprise run , and take somebody for everything they have , ” Owens told Beck .
Admitting she ’ s “ not entirely sure yet ” what office she ’ ll run for , Owens said she would win no matter what she chooses .
“ It will be a super surprise when I announce it , and I ’ ll tell you something else Glenn I ’ ll win .
There ’ ll be no question .
I would win .
I would win the entire thing .
They won ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @

Conservative commentator Candace Owens says she could soon be starting a career in politics.
After criticizing governors of various states over their coronavirus responses, Owens – a strong supporter of President Donald Trump – announced in a tweet Thursday she’d come to the realization she needs to run for office.
“I’m now honestly considering running for office,” Owens tweeted. “Never had any desire to previously, but something changed in me last night.”
I’m now honestly considering running for office. Never had any desire to previously, but something changed in me last night. Had a conversation with my husband and I think it’s a plan. — Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) April 2, 2020 Now that you're intellectually ahead, stay physically ahead by visiting our store.
“Had a conversation with my husband and I think it’s a plan.”
In an interview with radio host Glenn Beck Thursday, the founder of the BLEXIT movement admitted she’d realigned her thinking after growing frustrated in recent days with Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont and New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, whom she accuses of “lying to extract money from the federal government because their socialist-run states are out of money.”
Great news, America! @RealCandaceO is FINALLY thinking about running for office! “I think I should get into politics. And I’ll win. They won’t know what hit them.” pic.twitter.com/Bk1L6lWDLu — Glenn Beck (@glennbeck) April 2, 2020
“Watching the way these governors are lying and mismanaging, I’m getting sick of it, so I said to my husband, I think I should get into politics, I think I should run. I should surprise run, and take somebody for everything they have,” Owens told Beck.
Admitting she’s “not entirely sure yet” what office she’ll run for, Owens said she would win no matter what she chooses.
“It will be a super surprise when I announce it, and I’ll tell you something else Glenn I’ll win. There’ll be no question. I would win. I would win the entire thing. They won’t know what hit them.”
Follow the author on Gab: https://gab.ai/adansalazar
On Twitter: Follow @AdanSalazarWins
On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/adan.salazar.735
On Minds: https://www.minds.com/adan_infowars


newswars--2020-04-03--Trump Campaign Secretly Buying Meals For Medical Personnel Across USA

President Donald Trump ’ s 2020 reelection campaign is secretly buying meals for hundreds of medical workers across the United States .
Tens of thousands of dollars in food orders have been placed anonymously with iconic independent restaurants and delivered to over a dozen hospitals in states hit particularly hard by the coronavirus outbreak , such as New York , Washington , and Michigan .
“ They ’ re doing it as a donor who cares , ” a source told Fox News .
“ So nothing politically is tied to it.
” “ We ’ re just trying to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you.
” The campaign reportedly plans to expand the program in the coming weeks , using it as an opportunity to express gratitude to doctors , nurses , and first reponders while also supporting local businesses .
“ They ’ re trying to send things that are [ from ] local restaurants that may need support [ and ] cool restaurant icons of the area that may need the business , ” the source said .
Restaurant managers say they are fulfilling as many as “ 100 individual orders ” and delivering them @ @ @ @ @ @ @ told us their first name , ” explained an employee of Giovanni ’ s Italian Deli in Seacaucus , N.J. “ They called us , and they had us donate meals for the nurses and doctors — an assortment of things , 40 platters of pasta , salads , sandwiches.
” A campaign source tells Fox News that donation orders have been quietly placed at Nick ’ s Grill in Kirkland , Wash. ; Chit Chat Diner in Morristown , N.J. ; Turning Point of Long Branch , N.J. ; and Antonio ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , along with others .
Alex Jones examines the parallels between the 2005 movie ‘ V for Vendetta ’ and the coronavirus pandemic .

President Donald Trump’s 2020 reelection campaign is secretly buying meals for hundreds of medical workers across the United States.
Tens of thousands of dollars in food orders have been placed anonymously with iconic independent restaurants and delivered to over a dozen hospitals in states hit particularly hard by the coronavirus outbreak, such as New York, Washington, and Michigan.
“They’re doing it as a donor who cares,” a source told Fox News. “So nothing politically is tied to it.”
“We’re just trying to, you know, show a thank you.”
The campaign reportedly plans to expand the program in the coming weeks, using it as an opportunity to express gratitude to doctors, nurses, and first reponders while also supporting local businesses.
“They’re trying to send things that are [from] local restaurants that may need support [and] cool restaurant icons of the area that may need the business,” the source said.
Restaurant managers say they are fulfilling as many as “100 individual orders” and delivering them to nearby hospitals.
“They only told us their first name,” explained an employee of Giovanni’s Italian Deli in Seacaucus, N.J.
“They called us, and they had us donate meals for the nurses and doctors — an assortment of things, 40 platters of pasta, salads, sandwiches.”
A campaign source tells Fox News that donation orders have been quietly placed at Nick’s Grill in Kirkland, Wash.; Chit Chat Diner in Morristown, N.J.; Turning Point of Long Branch, N.J.; and Antonio’s Trattoria in the Bronx, N.Y., along with others.
Alex Jones examines the parallels between the 2005 movie ‘V for Vendetta’ and the coronavirus pandemic.
Dan Lyman: Follow @CitizenAnalyst


newswars--2020-04-03--CNN’s Cuomo Says Health Care Workers Call COVID-19 “The Beast” – Describes “Wicked Phantasmagorical”

CNN’s Cuomo Says Health Care Workers Call COVID-19 “The Beast” – Describes “Wicked Phantasmagorical” Visions

During a CNN town hall hosted by Anderson Cooper and Dr. Sanjay Gupta on Thursday night , CNN anchor Chris Cuomo described his firsthand experience of dealing with COVID-19 symptoms .
“ The beast comes at night , ” Cuomo said of the virus .
“ As we know the health care workers have taken to calling the virus … I understand why .
My fever has gone up a couple of degrees in like the last 30 minutes .
Nights are tough.
” As most people know , The Bible ’ s Book of Revelation speaks of “ two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reigns over the kings of the earth ” and another who is called the “ false prophet ” and forces the people of Earth to receive the mark of the beast “ in their right hand or in their forehead.
” Could this “ mark of the beast ” be a COVID-19 tracking bracelet , tattoo or vaccine , all of which have already been proposed .
Interestingly , internet users are pointing the six letters in the word “ corona ” happen to add up to 66 when using their alphabetic digits @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to assert that as someone dealing with the virus from home instead of being hospitalized , he ’ s still suffering .
“ You suffer when you have this at home unless you are ridiculously lucky statistically and maybe karmically as well , ” he said .
“ I can ’ t tell you how many stories I ’ ve had of people who have had a 100 , 102 fever for 8 , 10 , 12 days.
” The CNN anchor stressed he wasn ’ t trying to scare people , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ days despite “ eating and drinking constantly.
” Dr. Gupta then asked if Cuomo has found “ anything that works ” for him in regard to dealing with the virus .
“ The chicken soup is not just anecdotal , ” Cuomo replied .
“ You look online , even if you go to the Journal of the American Medical Association , that has worked for me I believe .
I believe it has lowered my fever at times.
” Continuing , Cuomo said , “ Now , what I ’ ve also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the internet that people are trying to peddle as cures .
Fake pills , fake tonics , these mixtures of things that are actually decent ingredients .
Vitamin C , Vitamin D are great supplements to have , but 10,000 , 20,000 units they want you to take of this.
” “ You ’ re not gon na overdose but it could be hard on your system , ” he clarified .
“ People are selling a lot of lies and people are buying them up because of the desperation and I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t work.
” Describing his symptoms at the time , Cuomo claimed to have a fever of around 101 , said he experiences headaches , severe sweating , blurred vision in his left eye and can not sleep .
“ And you have these wicked phantasmagorical experiences that are not dreams , ” he said , describing seeing his dead father sitting on the edge of his bed the night before .
Wikipedia describes phantasmagoria as “ a form of horror theatre that ( among other techniques ) used one or more magic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ skeletons , demons , and ghosts onto walls , smoke , or semi-transparent screens , typically using rear projection to keep the lantern out of sight.
” Despite all of this , he appears healthy as ever on television just hours before he is allegedly set to begin hallucinating .
Bill Gates is unmasking the real agenda behind Coronavirus and like always it ’ s about turning you further into human cattle .

During a CNN town hall hosted by Anderson Cooper and Dr. Sanjay Gupta on Thursday night, CNN anchor Chris Cuomo described his firsthand experience of dealing with COVID-19 symptoms.
“The beast comes at night as we know the health care workers have taking to call the virus … I understand why. My fever has gone up a couple of degrees in the last 30 minutes. Nights are tough.” – @ChrisCuomo, who tested positive for Covid-19, discusses his symptoms. pic.twitter.com/spfDdilnNg — CNN (@CNN) April 3, 2020
“The beast comes at night,” Cuomo said of the virus. “As we know the health care workers have taken to calling the virus … I understand why. My fever has gone up a couple of degrees in like the last 30 minutes. Nights are tough.”
As most people know, The Bible’s Book of Revelation speaks of “two beasts,” one of whom “reigns over the kings of the earth” and another who is called the “false prophet” and forces the people of Earth to receive the mark of the beast “in their right hand or in their forehead.”
Could this “mark of the beast” be a COVID-19 tracking bracelet, tattoo or vaccine, all of which have already been proposed.
Interestingly, internet users are pointing the six letters in the word “corona” happen to add up to 66 when using their alphabetic digits to represent them.
Each letter of the word CORONA when asigned its number of position in the alphabet, then you add those numbers downwards, you will get a total of 66. Then when you count the letters of the name CORONA, you will total to 6 letters.
Therefore CORONA=666. pic.twitter.com/VWPOEXTZXv — Derric⚡ (@derrickmugonero) March 27, 2020
Cuomo went on to assert that as someone dealing with the virus from home instead of being hospitalized, he’s still suffering.
“You suffer when you have this at home unless you are ridiculously lucky statistically and maybe karmically as well,” he said. “I can’t tell you how many stories I’ve had of people who have had a 100, 102 fever for 8, 10, 12 days.”
The CNN anchor stressed he wasn’t trying to scare people, but claimed he lost 13 pounds in 3 days despite “eating and drinking constantly.”
“Pain in my face… headaches, profuse sweating. Literally, my vision in my left eye is a little blurry,” @ChrisCuomo says of his coronavirus symptoms. “And you have these wicked phantasmagorical experiences that are not dreams,” he says. https://t.co/83d4itSajm #CNNTownHall pic.twitter.com/jjzIonuJ1s — CNN (@CNN) April 3, 2020
Dr. Gupta then asked if Cuomo has found “anything that works” for him in regard to dealing with the virus.
“The chicken soup is not just anecdotal,” Cuomo replied. “You look online, even if you go to the Journal of the American Medical Association, that has worked for me I believe. I believe it has lowered my fever at times.”
Continuing, Cuomo said, “Now, what I’ve also learned is there is so much BS on the internet that people are trying to peddle as cures. Fake pills, fake tonics, these mixtures of things that are actually decent ingredients. Vitamin C, Vitamin D are great supplements to have, but 10,000, 20,000 units they want you to take of this.”
“You’re not gonna overdose but it could be hard on your system,” he clarified. “People are selling a lot of lies and people are buying them up because of the desperation and I get it, but they don’t work.”
Describing his symptoms at the time, Cuomo claimed to have a fever of around 101, said he experiences headaches, severe sweating, blurred vision in his left eye and cannot sleep.
“And you have these wicked phantasmagorical experiences that are not dreams,” he said, describing seeing his dead father sitting on the edge of his bed the night before.
Wikipedia describes phantasmagoria as “a form of horror theatre that (among other techniques) used one or more magic lanterns to project frightening images such as skeletons, demons, and ghosts onto walls, smoke, or semi-transparent screens, typically using rear projection to keep the lantern out of sight.”
Despite all of this, he appears healthy as ever on television just hours before he is allegedly set to begin hallucinating.
Bill Gates is unmasking the real agenda behind Coronavirus and like always it’s about turning you further into human cattle.


newswars--2020-04-03--How Easy Money Is Increasing the Devastation of the COVID-19 Panic

A counterfactual experiment helps us realize the enormity of the present situation .
What Could Have Happened Suppose the COVID-19 pandemic had hit the globe under sound money , say a gold standard regime .
In that counterfactual there would be no overhang of virulent asset price inflation , no Federal Reserve at the ready to embark on endless ( and limitless ) QE ( quantitative easing ) and zero rates , and no megaprogram feasible for guaranteeing corporate debt issues as determined by the realpolitik of crony capitalism .
Solvent governments enjoying global confidence in their commitment to uphold @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gold would be able to launch huge social insurance programs to mitigate personal economic hardship resulting from the pandemic .
A key condition of that success : they must convince investors that remedial action to strengthen the public finances would follow the pandemic , meaning no resort to debasing the currency .
Countries which did not enjoy investor trust might have a harder job in expanding social insurance .
In some cases , this would mean an immediate harsh spike in interest rates as the public rushed to convert currency into gold , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gold standard and engage in monetary financing of the deficits .
Even in the financially solid countries , concerns about debt quality , especially the liabilities of firms and households in the most stricken sectors , and spillovers to liquidity and solvency of banks , would trigger an increase in demand for high-powered money ( banknotes , deposits at the central bank , and gold ) .
The monetary authorities there , however , would have scope to increase the supply of nonmetallic high-powered money and so alleviate any shortage ( avoid a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The automatic mechanisms of the sound money order would operate to force the retirement of that emergency issuance once the immediate crisis was over .
Action to thwart those mechanisms would undermine confidence in the continuation of the currency ’ s convertibility into gold .
Yes , there would be credit market tumult .
Supply shock amplified by mandatory economic lockdown would mean that earnings plummet or turn into loss across much of the enterprise sector , most of all at the shock ’ s epicenter .
Under a sound money regime , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ market capitalism , whereby equity capital earns a risk premium on average over the long run in exchange for insuring other stakeholders , especially labor , to some extent against adverse shock ( whether recession , change in taste , or natural disaster ) , would be honored .
Accordingly , during the years of prosperity businesses would have built up large cushions of equity capital which could absorb the impact of shock .
Under unsound money , by contrast , where there has been long and virulent asset inflation in which financial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ often in many camouflaged ways , so as to play on unleashed irrational forces ( such as income famine investors following momentum ) , effective equity cushions are thin .
This fact would be hidden from view during the peak of the asset inflation by sky-high valuations in the stock market , even when equity buyback programs were at their most aggressive .
In principle , where equity cushions are comfortable and natural disaster strikes , equity owners and creditors are in a position to negotiate a voluntary financial reconstruction from which all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the equity holders ) to exchange a share of their debt claims into equity .
In consequence , the debt claims rise in price ( from a fallen level that represents the debt impairment of the natural disaster ) .
The equity owners gain ( like the bond holders ) from a reduced likelihood of bankruptcy and all its deadweight costs .
This voluntary negotiation between equals can not take place if leverage was already so high before the natural disaster struck that bankruptcy is in fact already in plain sight .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ would lower the value of corporate equity in aggregate ( and risky bonds ) —but only by an amount which reflects the loss of earnings for the duration of the medical emergency .
By contrast , where the preexisting condition is one of virulent asset inflation , multiple crashes occur , amplified by the eruption of credit crisis .
Once popular , highly speculative narratives that yield-hungry investors accepted as truth , justifying the pursuit of aggressive credit carry trades and equity market strategies , suddenly lose their power to entice .
That @ @ @ @ @ @ @ struck .
Leverage and credulity in highly speculative narratives had been running far above sober , rational levels .
Hence the supply shock became the catalyst for the long and virulent asset inflation since 2012–13 to shift into a phase of bubble bursting .
Paradoxically , though , the perpetrators of the asset inflation—the central bankers and the presidents or prime ministers who steered their course by appointments—get a clear pass .
The crash is all the fault of COVID-19 , stupid .
The cabal of neo-Keynesians , ex–private equity barons , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ devise a more radical “ stimulus ” than ever before in peacetime .
By magic this is supposed to lessen the supply shock .
With the Federal Reserve leading the way into unlimited government bond purchases and zero interest rates , all the limits present in the counterfactual gold market case are blown apart .
This is no temporary operation—it is for the long haul .
The monetary “ stimulus ” is accompanied by massive government guarantee programs for selected corporations , allowing their debt to be purchased by the Federal Reserve .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ high inflation in the long aftermath of the pandemic , for crashes , and for recession .
As a practical matter the v shape of supply shock followed by rebound superimposes itself on the great recession and subsequent recovery , which follows long and virulent asset inflation .
The high inflation stems from a situation in which government debt outstanding has soared , with financially crippled firms populating large parts of the economy .
In no way would governments and their central banks raise rates from zero or cease manipulating long-term rates even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ They will publicly deny that this momentum exists .
Their story will be forever that evidence of high inflation is fleeting , that in any case inflation in recent years undershot target , and that vulnerable enterprises should not be imperiled by blind orthodoxy .
In our present unanchored monetary systems , this depends on unidentifiable monetary excess allowing prices to generally rise strongly without setting off any brake .
With the vast amounts of capital investment of recent years effectively economically obsolescent ( the reality of malinvestment ) , the supply side @ @ @ @ @ @ @ crippling , and the nonmonetary disinflation force of globalization in retreat , the preconditions are all in place for high goods and services inflation to emerge .
Obsolescent human capital and the shrinkage of opportunity in sectors where low-paid workers could once find employment mean that inflation can take off at an aggregate unemployment rate that is strikingly high compared to recent history .
Within that aggregate , some sections of the highly heterogeneous labor market will be very tight .
The monetary twin of goods and services inflation—asset inflation—will reemerge in strength @ @ @ @ @ @ @ old surviving ones , most of all in big tech ) and a different collection of epicenters from what we have become used to during the past decade and more .
The skill needed to analyze these past , present , and future cycles is the same as what Balzac prescribed for the literary author—a capacity to both individualize types and typify individuals .

A counterfactual experiment helps us realize the enormity of the present situation.
What Could Have Happened
Suppose the COVID-19 pandemic had hit the globe under sound money, say a gold standard regime. In that counterfactual there would be no overhang of virulent asset price inflation, no Federal Reserve at the ready to embark on endless (and limitless) QE (quantitative easing) and zero rates, and no megaprogram feasible for guaranteeing corporate debt issues as determined by the realpolitik of crony capitalism.
Solvent governments enjoying global confidence in their commitment to uphold the convertibility of the national money into gold would be able to launch huge social insurance programs to mitigate personal economic hardship resulting from the pandemic. A key condition of that success: they must convince investors that remedial action to strengthen the public finances would follow the pandemic, meaning no resort to debasing the currency.
Countries which did not enjoy investor trust might have a harder job in expanding social insurance. In some cases, this would mean an immediate harsh spike in interest rates as the public rushed to convert currency into gold, triggering a decision to temporarily suspend the gold standard and engage in monetary financing of the deficits.
Even in the financially solid countries, concerns about debt quality, especially the liabilities of firms and households in the most stricken sectors, and spillovers to liquidity and solvency of banks, would trigger an increase in demand for high-powered money (banknotes, deposits at the central bank, and gold). The monetary authorities there, however, would have scope to increase the supply of nonmetallic high-powered money and so alleviate any shortage (avoid a sharp rise in money rates). The automatic mechanisms of the sound money order would operate to force the retirement of that emergency issuance once the immediate crisis was over. Action to thwart those mechanisms would undermine confidence in the continuation of the currency’s convertibility into gold.
Yes, there would be credit market tumult. Supply shock amplified by mandatory economic lockdown would mean that earnings plummet or turn into loss across much of the enterprise sector, most of all at the shock’s epicenter.
Under a sound money regime, however, the social contract of free market capitalism, whereby equity capital earns a risk premium on average over the long run in exchange for insuring other stakeholders, especially labor, to some extent against adverse shock (whether recession, change in taste, or natural disaster), would be honored. Accordingly, during the years of prosperity businesses would have built up large cushions of equity capital which could absorb the impact of shock.
What Did Happen
Under unsound money, by contrast, where there has been long and virulent asset inflation in which financial engineers have succeeded in bolstering leverage, often in many camouflaged ways, so as to play on unleashed irrational forces (such as income famine investors following momentum), effective equity cushions are thin. This fact would be hidden from view during the peak of the asset inflation by sky-high valuations in the stock market, even when equity buyback programs were at their most aggressive.
In principle, where equity cushions are comfortable and natural disaster strikes, equity owners and creditors are in a position to negotiate a voluntary financial reconstruction from which all gain. The creditors are invited (by the equity holders) to exchange a share of their debt claims into equity. In consequence, the debt claims rise in price (from a fallen level that represents the debt impairment of the natural disaster). The equity owners gain (like the bond holders) from a reduced likelihood of bankruptcy and all its deadweight costs. This voluntary negotiation between equals cannot take place if leverage was already so high before the natural disaster struck that bankruptcy is in fact already in plain sight.
Even under sound money, the pandemic would lower the value of corporate equity in aggregate (and risky bonds)—but only by an amount which reflects the loss of earnings for the duration of the medical emergency. By contrast, where the preexisting condition is one of virulent asset inflation, multiple crashes occur, amplified by the eruption of credit crisis. Once popular, highly speculative narratives that yield-hungry investors accepted as truth, justifying the pursuit of aggressive credit carry trades and equity market strategies, suddenly lose their power to entice.
That was the situation when the COVID-19 pandemic struck. Leverage and credulity in highly speculative narratives had been running far above sober, rational levels. Hence the supply shock became the catalyst for the long and virulent asset inflation since 2012–13 to shift into a phase of bubble bursting. Paradoxically, though, the perpetrators of the asset inflation—the central bankers and the presidents or prime ministers who steered their course by appointments—get a clear pass. The crash is all the fault of COVID-19, stupid.
The cabal of neo-Keynesians, ex–private equity barons, and populists at the monetary policy command center devise a more radical “stimulus” than ever before in peacetime. By magic this is supposed to lessen the supply shock. With the Federal Reserve leading the way into unlimited government bond purchases and zero interest rates, all the limits present in the counterfactual gold market case are blown apart.
This is no temporary operation—it is for the long haul. The monetary “stimulus” is accompanied by massive government guarantee programs for selected corporations, allowing their debt to be purchased by the Federal Reserve.
All of this sets the stage for high inflation in the long aftermath of the pandemic, for crashes, and for recession. As a practical matter the v shape of supply shock followed by rebound superimposes itself on the great recession and subsequent recovery, which follows long and virulent asset inflation. The high inflation stems from a situation in which government debt outstanding has soared, with financially crippled firms populating large parts of the economy.
In no way would governments and their central banks raise rates from zero or cease manipulating long-term rates even if inflationary momentum were to develop. They will publicly deny that this momentum exists. Their story will be forever that evidence of high inflation is fleeting, that in any case inflation in recent years undershot target, and that vulnerable enterprises should not be imperiled by blind orthodoxy.
Why Should Inflationary Momentum Develop?
In our present unanchored monetary systems, this depends on unidentifiable monetary excess allowing prices to generally rise strongly without setting off any brake. With the vast amounts of capital investment of recent years effectively economically obsolescent (the reality of malinvestment), the supply side of the economy lamed by widespread financial crippling, and the nonmonetary disinflation force of globalization in retreat, the preconditions are all in place for high goods and services inflation to emerge.
Obsolescent human capital and the shrinkage of opportunity in sectors where low-paid workers could once find employment mean that inflation can take off at an aggregate unemployment rate that is strikingly high compared to recent history. Within that aggregate, some sections of the highly heterogeneous labor market will be very tight.
The monetary twin of goods and services inflation—asset inflation—will reemerge in strength but with new narratives (alongside some old surviving ones, most of all in big tech) and a different collection of epicenters from what we have become used to during the past decade and more. The skill needed to analyze these past, present, and future cycles is the same as what Balzac prescribed for the literary author—a capacity to both individualize types and typify individuals.