newswars--2020-02-06--YouTube Pledges To Remove “Manipulated” Election-related Videos

Wrongthink could be defined as ‘ misleading voters ’ Youtube announced this week that it will begin removing election-related videos that are “ manipulated or doctored ” with the aim of influencing voters .
The move is part of an effort by the Google owned company to be a “ more reliable source ” for news and to promote a “ healthy political discourse ” .
YouTube ’ s vice president of government affairs and public policy , Leslie Miller commented “ …the service ’ s community standards prohibit content that has been technically manipulated or doctored in a way @ @ @ @ @ @ @ serious risk of egregious harm.
” Of course , what constitutes “ manipulation ” and a “ healthy political discourse ” will be entirely decided by techie elites in Silicon Vally , who don ’ t have the most balanced of records .
Therefore , merely including footage of election candidates in videos and expressing an opinion that doesn ’ t jive with YouTube overlords could be construed as ‘ misleading voters ’ by the company .
YouTube says it is not only going to focus on so called ‘ deep fake ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to make it appear that a political figure is doing or saying something they have actually never done or said , but that they will also look for what they describe as ‘ shallow fakes ’ .
Again , what ‘ shallow fakes ’ actually are is not specifically explained , except to say that they use more ‘ rudimentary ’ techniques than deep fakes to mislead voters .
The only specific examples YouTube gives is that it will remove videos that claim “ a candidate is not eligible to hold office based @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” and that it will remove any video “ manipulated to make it appear that a government official is dead ” or that “ aims to mislead people about voting or the census processes , like telling viewers an incorrect voting date.
” YouTube has a recent history of banning Conservative opinion on its platform : The move by YouTube follows an announcement by Facebook that it will not interfere with political ads on its platform , and an announcement conversely by Twitter that it will ban all political ads for candidates .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ down on ‘ synthetic or manipulated media that are likely to cause harm ’ : The platform just banned conservative investigative reporter James O ’ Keefe for probing into Bernie Sanders ’ campaign :

Wrongthink could be defined as ‘misleading voters’
Youtube announced this week that it will begin removing election-related videos that are “manipulated or doctored” with the aim of influencing voters.
The move is part of an effort by the Google owned company to be a “more reliable source” for news and to promote a “healthy political discourse”.
YouTube’s vice president of government affairs and public policy, Leslie Miller commented “…the service’s community standards prohibit content that has been technically manipulated or doctored in a way that misleads users… and may pose a serious risk of egregious harm.”
Of course, what constitutes “manipulation” and a “healthy political discourse” will be entirely decided by techie elites in Silicon Vally, who don’t have the most balanced of records.
Therefore, merely including footage of election candidates in videos and expressing an opinion that doesn’t jive with YouTube overlords could be construed as ‘misleading voters’ by the company.
YouTube says it is not only going to focus on so called ‘deep fake’ videos, where AI software is used to make it appear that a political figure is doing or saying something they have actually never done or said, but that they will also look for what they describe as ‘shallow fakes’.
Again, what ‘shallow fakes’ actually are is not specifically explained, except to say that they use more ‘rudimentary’ techniques than deep fakes to mislead voters.
The only specific examples YouTube gives is that it will remove videos that claim “a candidate is not eligible to hold office based on false information about citizenship status requirements” and that it will remove any video “manipulated to make it appear that a government official is dead” or that “aims to mislead people about voting or the census processes, like telling viewers an incorrect voting date.”
YouTube has a recent history of banning Conservative opinion on its platform:
The move by YouTube follows an announcement by Facebook that it will not interfere with political ads on its platform, and an announcement conversely by Twitter that it will ban all political ads for candidates.
Twitter also announced that it will crack down on ‘synthetic or manipulated media that are likely to cause harm’:
Translation: We will ban you for memes. https://t.co/JUFa4pby5m — Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) February 4, 2020
The platform just banned conservative investigative reporter James O’Keefe for probing into Bernie Sanders’ campaign:


newswars--2020-02-06--How To Get Banned From Social Media in 3…2…1

The Big Tech giants want you to stop spreading unfounded conspiracy theories rejected by the establishment media .
That means @ @ @ @ @ coronavirus is the truth .
“ Are you interested to know what they don ’ @ @ @ @ @ ?
You ought to be.
” – David Knight

The Big Tech giants want you to stop spreading unfounded conspiracy theories rejected by the establishment media.
That means the first casualty of the coronavirus is the truth.
“Are you interested to know what they don’t want you to know? You ought to be.” – David Knight
YouTube Version:


newswars--2020-02-06--Planned Spectacle: Pelosi Pre-Ripped SOTU Speech

Evidence has emerged showing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi had planned to rip up her copy of President Trump ’ s @ @ @ @ @ all along .
Video appears to show Pelosi conducting a practice tear test towards the @ @ @ @ @ Photos suggest the Democrat U.S. rep might have actually “ pre-ripped ” a few of @ @ @ @ @ One Associated Press photo , highlighted by the New York Post , shows a tear @ @ @ @ @ of a paper appearing to be the president ’ s speech .
The Speaker ’ @ @ @ @ @ signify her disdain of Trump , backfired however , as many C-SPAN callers Tuesday night @ @ @ @ @ party over the disrespectful move .
Here are the top highlights from the 2020 State @ @ @ @ @ including President Trump honoring multiple American heroes and families and Nancy Pelosi ’ s complete @ @ @ @ @ .

Evidence has emerged showing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi had planned to rip up her copy of President Trump’s State of the Union speech all along.
Video appears to show Pelosi conducting a practice tear test towards the end of the address.
Photos suggest the Democrat U.S. rep might have actually “pre-ripped” a few of the pages in advance.
One Associated Press photo, highlighted by the New York Post, shows a tear on the left hand side of a paper appearing to be the president’s speech.
The Speaker’s rip, meant to signify her disdain of Trump, backfired however, as many C-SPAN callers Tuesday night said they would leave the party over the disrespectful move.
WOW! After the State Of The Union DEMOCRAT callers into C-SPAN completely destroyed Pelosi, saying they will NEVER vote for the Democrat Party again!😮 @realDonaldTrump #sotu #StateOfTheUnion #NancyPelosi pic.twitter.com/mB3ExhXWdr — Maggie VandenBerghe 🇺🇸 (@FogCityMidge) February 5, 2020
Here are the top highlights from the 2020 State of The Union Address, including President Trump honoring multiple American heroes and families and Nancy Pelosi’s complete meltdown that shocked the nation.


newswars--2020-02-06--Instagram, Facebook Ban Censored.TV

Instagram, Facebook Ban Censored.TV

Facebook and Instagram on Thursday banned the pages of Censored.TV , the paid subscription network founded by Gavin McInnes .
On Thursday , users began reporting they were unable to post links containing the “ censored.tv ” url on the social media platforms .
The network , spearheaded by McInnes , features shows from various personalities that have been banned off of YouTube , including 15-year-old commentator “ Soph , ” Milo Yiannopoulos , Laura Loomer , Joe Biggs and more .
In an interview Thursday with Infowars ’ War Room , McInnes said the ban started when the social @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Proud boys , ” as a hate group .
The impetus for all this is this lie that Proud Boys are a “ hate group , ” or something , and that ’ s just as dangerous as ISIS .
Today the FBI announced that ISIS and white nationalists are the same terror threat – which is completely insane .
So they start with that point , and then they say , well , I have to be banned because I started it , and then anyone associated with me has to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this crippling need to make sure that white nationalism is our biggest concern , that we ’ re all scared of nazis , and Trump is a nazi so that ’ s our biggest priority .
Meanwhile , it ’ s a totally irrelevant , tiny group of dozens of people .
Proud Boys have nothing to do with them , at all .
But this narrative works because we ’ re living in the era of mental obesity where they go , “ Oh , those are the bad guys ?
Oh @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Democrat strategy to use Big Tech to censor conservative voices online ahead of the upcoming 2020 election in November .

Facebook and Instagram on Thursday banned the pages of Censored.TV, the paid subscription network founded by Gavin McInnes.
On Thursday, users began reporting they were unable to post links containing the “censored.tv” url on the social media platforms.
The network, spearheaded by McInnes, features shows from various personalities that have been banned off of YouTube, including 15-year-old commentator “Soph,” Milo Yiannopoulos, Laura Loomer, Joe Biggs and more.
In an interview Thursday with Infowars’ War Room, McInnes said the ban started when the social media companies designated his group, “Proud boys,” as a hate group.
The impetus for all this is this lie that Proud Boys are a “hate group,” or something, and that’s just as dangerous as ISIS. Today the FBI announced that ISIS and white nationalists are the same terror threat – which is completely insane. So they start with that point, and then they say, well, I have to be banned because I started it, and then anyone associated with me has to be banned, and it seems to be this crippling need to make sure that white nationalism is our biggest concern, that we’re all scared of nazis, and Trump is a nazi so that’s our biggest priority. Meanwhile, it’s a totally irrelevant, tiny group of dozens of people. Proud Boys have nothing to do with them, at all. But this narrative works because we’re living in the era of mental obesity where they go, “Oh, those are the bad guys? Oh, Okay.”
Stay tuned: War Room interview with Censored.tv’s Gavin McInnes coming soon!
Owen exposes the latest Democrat strategy to use Big Tech to censor conservative voices online ahead of the upcoming 2020 election in November.


newswars--2020-02-06--“Christian” Buttigieg Refuses To Condemn Late-Term Abortions On “The View”

Democrat presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg refused to denounce late-term abortions after being confronted by The View co-host Meghan McCain .
McCain asked Mayor Pete to provide more context on an interview he recently did where he said , “ A lot of parts of the Bible talk about how life begins with birth.
” She explained how many pro-life Americans interpreted the comment as meaning life begins with “ a baby actually being born.
” “ I wanted you to clarify because I found that statement to be pretty radical , ” she added .
McCain compared Buttigieg ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Northam , who infamously talked about keeping babies comfortable and deciding what to do with them after they are removed from the mother ’ s womb during late-term abortions .
The Democrat candidate , who claims to be a Christian , avoided answering McCain ’ s question and replied , “ I ’ m just pointing to the fact that different people will interpret their own moral lights and , for that matter , interpret Scripture differently.
” Again trying to get an answer out of the former Indiana mayor , McCain told @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that needs to be addressed and gave him another opportunity to make his stance on the subject publicly known .
“ My point is that it shouldn ’ t be up to a government official to draw the line , it should be up to the woman who is confronted with the choice , ” he responded , essentially confirming he doesn ’ t care how far along in a pregnancy a woman can choose to terminate her baby .
“ So if a woman wanted to invoke infanticide after a baby was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” McCain asked .
Buttigieg retorted , “ Does anybody seriously think that ’ s what these cases are about ?
Think about the situation : If this is a late-term situation , then by definition , it ’ s one where a woman was expecting to carry the pregnancy to term.
” Realizing the presidential hopeful wasn ’ t going to give her a straight answer , McCain said , “ that answer is just as radical as I thought it was , ” and warned him , “ This is going @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the country with the Republicans you ’ re trying to win over .
”

Democrat presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg refused to denounce late-term abortions after being confronted by The View co-host Meghan McCain.
WATCH: Pete Buttigieg refuses to give a stance on partial birth abortion. pic.twitter.com/J6QsbfXntc — America Rising (@AmericaRising) February 6, 2020
McCain asked Mayor Pete to provide more context on an interview he recently did where he said, “A lot of parts of the Bible talk about how life begins with birth.”
She explained how many pro-life Americans interpreted the comment as meaning life begins with “a baby actually being born.”
“I wanted you to clarify because I found that statement to be pretty radical,” she added.
McCain compared Buttigieg’s stance with that of Virginia Governor Ralph Northam, who infamously talked about keeping babies comfortable and deciding what to do with them after they are removed from the mother’s womb during late-term abortions.
The Democrat candidate, who claims to be a Christian, avoided answering McCain’s question and replied, “I’m just pointing to the fact that different people will interpret their own moral lights and, for that matter, interpret Scripture differently.”
Again trying to get an answer out of the former Indiana mayor, McCain told Pete partial-birth abortion is a controversial topic that needs to be addressed and gave him another opportunity to make his stance on the subject publicly known.
“My point is that it shouldn’t be up to a government official to draw the line, it should be up to the woman who is confronted with the choice,” he responded, essentially confirming he doesn’t care how far along in a pregnancy a woman can choose to terminate her baby.
“So if a woman wanted to invoke infanticide after a baby was born you’d be comfortable?” McCain asked.
Buttigieg retorted, “Does anybody seriously think that’s what these cases are about? Think about the situation: If this is a late-term situation, then by definition, it’s one where a woman was expecting to carry the pregnancy to term.”
Realizing the presidential hopeful wasn’t going to give her a straight answer, McCain said, “that answer is just as radical as I thought it was,” and warned him, “This is going to hurt you in the middle of the country with the Republicans you’re trying to win over.”


newswars--2020-02-06--What Year Did Healthcare Become a “Right?”

Bernie Sanders declares with piety , “ Healthcare is a human right.
” His statement may sound reasonable , because when we think about someone without healthcare what comes to mind is pain , suffering , and the loss of hope and dignity .
Bernie is correct that no one in a country as prosperous as ours should be without some form of healthcare .
However , is healthcare truly a right ?
It may sound terrible to some , but the answer is no .
Healthcare is not a right nor can it ever be , for very sound @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Before we delve into what are actual rights , I have a simple question for Bernie : exactly when did healthcare become a right ?
Healthcare can not possibly be a natural right since healthcare—as we tend to define it today—was not in existence when humans first roamed the planet .
Until healthcare was invented , it could never have been a right .
So , if it wasn ’ t a right from the dawn of time , when did it become a right in Bernie ’ s mind ?
Whichever date @ @ @ @ @ @ @ arbitrary number .
Let ’ s say Bernie ’ s magic date when healthcare became a right was 1900 .
All the available knowledge about medicine , medical devices such as x-ray machines , and drugs such as cocaine would be considered rights available to all as needed under Bernie ’ s mandate .
But what about all the inventions yet to come ?
Are those somehow “ grandchilded ” in ?
Since 1900 , many significant developments have occurred in the medical field , and almost all of them were very expensive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ new drug called Zolgensma , for example , costs patients $ 2.125 million per patient .
Zolegensma was not available to the public until the FDA approved it in 2019 .
If healthcare had been a right in 2018 , then presumably Zolgensma would have also been a right , although in 2018 it would have been illegal to sell it to the public .
By 2019 , however , it might have been transformed into something we all have a “ right ” to use .
Was the FDA approval the transformative @ @ @ @ @ @ @ turned Zolgensma from an illegal-to-sell substance into something to which one has a right ?
This is unclear .
Of course , it may be that the administrators of Bernie-care would have decided to not fund Zolgensma under the Bernie-care system .
Cost controls of this sort are necessary under any healthcare system .
The United Kingdom ’ s National Health Service ( NHS ) , for example , employs bureaucrats to determine what health treatments are to be funded and which are not .
But if the use of Zolgensma—or any substance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bernie-care , it implies that not all healthcare is actually a right .
This brings us to the next question : even if we all agree that healthcare should be a right , what does Bernie mean by “ healthcare ” ?
Healthcare comprises many different services , procedures , and medicines .
Are all those products and services considered healthcare as of the date that Sanders deems it became a right ?
If so , there is a big problem with that reasoning .
Notice that these sorts of rights are not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the whims of politicians and to budgetary constraints .
In practice , these whims extend far beyond just approving certain drugs .
For example , the NHS supposedly provided healthcare as a right—until they started running out of other people ’ s money .
Now , if a patient smokes or is obese he or she will be refused treatment—or at least be moved to the back of the line until s/he stops smoking or loses weight .
Some people apparently have more rights than others under the NHS .
What Real Rights @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rights in 1689 , in his Second Treatise of Government .
He stated that all humans have three inalienable rights from nature : the right to exist , the right to live free , and the right to property .
These rights are natural because no one is forced to comply with them , nor do they require one to do anything .
The fact that these laws are trampled on by other people and governments repeatedly does not mean they don ’ t exist .
The nature of these rights does not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ We do not need government administrators to determine what new technologies will be approved for the purposes of not stealing and not murdering others .
These are negative rights that do not require any funding or action beyond refraining from violating the rights of others .
Most other types of “ rights ” are actually infringements on real rights .
That is , for Sanders to make healthcare a human right , he could only do so by forcing that “ right ” on all of us .
Bernie could argue that this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rights to life , liberty , and property ( curing a disease , keeping one healthy enough to continue working and saving monies that would have otherwise gone to pay for healthcare ) .
The new right , however , would violate the rights to freedom and property enjoyed by others .
For example , if one is required by law to participate in a Medicare for All plan—to provide for the “ right ” to healthcare—one has no choice in the matter ( loss of liberty ) and one must contribute money @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) .
Almost any right provided by government will cost somebody something .
And that “ something ” is taxes and the “ somebody ” is the taxpayer .
If healthcare is a right , then it can be argued that almost anything else is a right as well .
Toothbrushes and toothpaste ?
Everyone needs to brush his or her teeth ; those should be rights .
Everyone needs to communicate , therefore , ownership of cell phones—and all future communication technologies—must be a right as well .
It ’ s easy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ leads .
Dr. Francis Boyle , who drafted the Biological Weapons Act , joins Owen Shroyer on The Alex Jones Show to expose the 2019 Wuhan coronavirus as an offensive biological warfare weapon that the World Health Organization ( WHO ) already knows about .

Bernie Sanders declares with piety, “Healthcare is a human right.” His statement may sound reasonable, because when we think about someone without healthcare what comes to mind is pain, suffering, and the loss of hope and dignity.
Bernie is correct that no one in a country as prosperous as ours should be without some form of healthcare. However, is healthcare truly a right? It may sound terrible to some, but the answer is no. Healthcare is not a right nor can it ever be, for very sound reasons.
What Exactly Is Healthcare?
Before we delve into what are actual rights, I have a simple question for Bernie: exactly when did healthcare become a right?
Healthcare cannot possibly be a natural right since healthcare—as we tend to define it today—was not in existence when humans first roamed the planet. Until healthcare was invented, it could never have been a right. So, if it wasn’t a right from the dawn of time, when did it become a right in Bernie’s mind? Whichever date he picked, it would be an arbitrary number.
Let’s say Bernie’s magic date when healthcare became a right was 1900. All the available knowledge about medicine, medical devices such as x-ray machines, and drugs such as cocaine would be considered rights available to all as needed under Bernie’s mandate. But what about all the inventions yet to come? Are those somehow “grandchilded” in? Since 1900, many significant developments have occurred in the medical field, and almost all of them were very expensive when first brought to market. A new drug called Zolgensma, for example, costs patients $2.125 million per patient. Zolegensma was not available to the public until the FDA approved it in 2019. If healthcare had been a right in 2018, then presumably Zolgensma would have also been a right, although in 2018 it would have been illegal to sell it to the public. By 2019, however, it might have been transformed into something we all have a “right” to use. Was the FDA approval the transformative event? If not, what exactly turned Zolgensma from an illegal-to-sell substance into something to which one has a right? This is unclear. Of course, it may be that the administrators of Bernie-care would have decided to not fund Zolgensma under the Bernie-care system. Cost controls of this sort are necessary under any healthcare system. The United Kingdom’s National Health Service (NHS), for example, employs bureaucrats to determine what health treatments are to be funded and which are not. But if the use of Zolgensma—or any substance purported to be medicine—is not allowed under Bernie-care, it implies that not all healthcare is actually a right.
This brings us to the next question: even if we all agree that healthcare should be a right, what does Bernie mean by “healthcare”? Healthcare comprises many different services, procedures, and medicines. Are all those products and services considered healthcare as of the date that Sanders deems it became a right? If so, there is a big problem with that reasoning.
Notice that these sorts of rights are not truly rights at all—they are subject to the whims of politicians and to budgetary constraints. In practice, these whims extend far beyond just approving certain drugs. For example, the NHS supposedly provided healthcare as a right—until they started running out of other people’s money. Now, if a patient smokes or is obese he or she will be refused treatment—or at least be moved to the back of the line until s/he stops smoking or loses weight. Some people apparently have more rights than others under the NHS.
This isn’t how real rights work.
What Real Rights Look Like
John Locke summarized natural human rights in 1689, in his Second Treatise of Government. He stated that all humans have three inalienable rights from nature: the right to exist, the right to live free, and the right to property. These rights are natural because no one is forced to comply with them, nor do they require one to do anything. The fact that these laws are trampled on by other people and governments repeatedly does not mean they don’t exist.
The nature of these rights does not change over time as technology changes. We do not need government administrators to determine what new technologies will be approved for the purposes of not stealing and not murdering others.
These are negative rights that do not require any funding or action beyond refraining from violating the rights of others. Most other types of “rights” are actually infringements on real rights.
That is, for Sanders to make healthcare a human right, he could only do so by forcing that “right” on all of us. Bernie could argue that this law would enhance everyone’s natural rights to life, liberty, and property (curing a disease, keeping one healthy enough to continue working and saving monies that would have otherwise gone to pay for healthcare). The new right, however, would violate the rights to freedom and property enjoyed by others.
For example, if one is required by law to participate in a Medicare for All plan—to provide for the “right” to healthcare—one has no choice in the matter (loss of liberty) and one must contribute money to the plan (loss of property). Almost any right provided by government will cost somebody something. And that “something” is taxes and the “somebody” is the taxpayer.
If healthcare is a right, then it can be argued that almost anything else is a right as well. Toothbrushes and toothpaste? Everyone needs to brush his or her teeth; those should be rights. Everyone needs to communicate, therefore, ownership of cell phones—and all future communication technologies—must be a right as well.
It’s easy to see where this sort of thinking leads.
Dr. Francis Boyle, who drafted the Biological Weapons Act, joins Owen Shroyer on The Alex Jones Show to expose the 2019 Wuhan coronavirus as an offensive biological warfare weapon that the World Health Organization (WHO) already knows about.


newswars--2020-02-06--Calif. Sheriff: Illegals Committing More Repeat Crimes Due to ‘Sanctuary’ Laws

Orange County , California , has seen a 38 percent spike in repeat offenses by criminals present in the U.S. illegally due to the state ’ s ‘ sanctuary ’ policies , according to Sheriff Don Barnes .
In a press release , the Orange County Sheriff ’ s Department documented crimes committed by illegal aliens after their release from custody for previous offenses , including rape , domestic abuse , robbery , and assault .
“ SB54 has made our community less safe .
The law has resulted in new crimes because my deputies were unable to communicate with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ serious offenses and present a threat to our community if released , ” said Sheriff Barnes .
“ The two-year social science experiment with sanctuary laws must end .
Rather than protect our immigrant community , the law has enabled offenders to be released , often times back into the immigrant communities they prey upon , and create new victims.
” California officially became a sanctuary state on Jan. 1 , 2018 , with the implementation of SB 54 , which protects illegal aliens from federal immigration enforcement and severely restricts communication between @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ The senate bill restricts law enforcement from notifying , transferring and communicating with federal immigration authorities regarding certain offenders , ” the O.C .
Sheriff ’ s Department explains .
“ The implementation of this bill also effectively ended the Sheriff ’ s Departments 287 ( g ) program , which allowed custody deputies to place detainers on undocumented individuals in the Orange County Jail.
” “ Deputies do not ask for immigration status in the performance of their duties , and they do not make arrests for violation of federal immigration @ @ @ @ @ @ @ setting , sharing information is critical to public safety and serves as a valuable tool to ensure those harming others are removed from the community.
” Mike Adams reveals why scientists believe the border crisis may leave American sanctuary cities vulnerable to the coronavirus pandemic .
By the way , people who know what ’ s coming are taking advantage of our healthy & delicious storable food !

Orange County, California, has seen a 38 percent spike in repeat offenses by criminals present in the U.S. illegally due to the state’s ‘sanctuary’ policies, according to Sheriff Don Barnes.
In a press release, the Orange County Sheriff’s Department documented crimes committed by illegal aliens after their release from custody for previous offenses, including rape, domestic abuse, robbery, and assault.
SB 54 has made OC less safe. The 2 year social science experiment with sanctuary laws must end. Rather than protect our immigrant community, the law has enabled offenders to be released, often times back into the immigrant communities they prey upon, and create new victims. https://t.co/QyPMcPD5OU — OC Sheriff Don Barnes (@OCSheriffBarnes) February 3, 2020
“SB54 has made our community less safe. The law has resulted in new crimes because my deputies were unable to communicate with their federal partners about individuals who committed serious offenses and present a threat to our community if released,” said Sheriff Barnes.
“The two-year social science experiment with sanctuary laws must end. Rather than protect our immigrant community, the law has enabled offenders to be released, often times back into the immigrant communities they prey upon, and create new victims.”
California officially became a sanctuary state on Jan. 1, 2018, with the implementation of SB 54, which protects illegal aliens from federal immigration enforcement and severely restricts communication between police and agencies such as ICE.
“The senate bill restricts law enforcement from notifying, transferring and communicating with federal immigration authorities regarding certain offenders,” the O.C. Sheriff’s Department explains. “The implementation of this bill also effectively ended the Sheriff’s Departments 287(g) program, which allowed custody deputies to place detainers on undocumented individuals in the Orange County Jail.”
“Deputies do not ask for immigration status in the performance of their duties, and they do not make arrests for violation of federal immigration laws. However, in a custody setting, sharing information is critical to public safety and serves as a valuable tool to ensure those harming others are removed from the community.”
Mike Adams reveals why scientists believe the border crisis may leave American sanctuary cities vulnerable to the coronavirus pandemic.
By the way, people who know what’s coming are taking advantage of our healthy & delicious storable food!
Dan Lyman: Follow @CitizenAnalyst


newswars--2020-02-06--Intellectual Property: Innovation Should Serve Consumers, Not Producers

Proponents of intellectual property rights often rely on one of two lines of reasoning .
The first is based on the misunderstanding that the frequency or volume of innovations determine economic growth .
The second is captured by the question , “ So if I spend $ 1 billion on R & D ( research and development ) to bring a new drug to market , anyone should be able to copy my drug without compensation ?
” Both are based on the same fundamental error : assuming that innovation is a matter of production .
It is not .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ that ’ s why intellectual property rights do not and can not help .
The economic growth argument appears to be in line with empirical observation .
After all , it is the introduction of and change caused by valuable innovations that make us better off and raise our standard of living .
But as is so often the case , observations in economics tend to lead to problematic if not false conclusions .
The market is a trial-and-error process under uncertainty , in which entrepreneurs and businesses compete by offering goods and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ future point in time better than the offerings of others .
Then , obviously , innovations are important .
But it is not the number of innovations attempted that matters .
There is also scarcity , meaning that a market process that generates a huge number of innovations may in effect produce less value than a process that generates only a few .
Quality is more important than quantity , just like aiming the one arrow will produce a better result than shooting a great number of arrows in random directions .
Although @ @ @ @ @ @ @ aim for , their “ division of intellectual labor ” places boundaries on what attempts are made .
Innovations are uncertain , but not undirected or random .
The compensation argument makes the same mistake but clarifies the error .
The issue in the market is not about compensation for investment or effort made , but the creation of value for consumers .
We are not , and should not be , compensated for the time and effort we put into something , but for our contribution to value .
The reason we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that we get up in the morning and spend our days doing tedious tasks and following management ’ s orders , but because the entrepreneurs , along with their “ junior partners ” ( management ) , are betting that this type of production will be valuable to consumers and thus generate revenue that more than covers cost .
In other words , that a firm invests in research and development is not primarily a matter of production , but one of attempting to find solutions that consumers will value .
It is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that exceeds cost .
Such revenue is generated , because this effort turns out to be more valuable to consumers relative to other entrepreneurial undertakings .
As Mises puts it , “ The only source from which an entrepreneur ’ s profits stem is his ability to anticipate better than other people the future demand of the consumers ” ( emphasis added ) .
The entrepreneurial problem , therefore , is one about better figuring out how to serve consumers .
Innovation is undoubtedly a means toward that end , but whether an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ innovation being new or even costing a lot of money to carry out , but on whether it is correctly positioned with respect to ( 1 ) consumers ’ ( future ) wants and ( 2 ) other entrepreneurs ’ ( future ) offerings .
Both aspects are necessary for the market process to progress and thereby improve our standard of living .
Intellectual property rights , imposed on entrepreneurs generally and thus on the market , mean that entrepreneurs are relieved of the second part of the problem—the positioning relative to other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this type of regulation , but what it means is that entrepreneurs can and will overinvest in innovations that comply with the regulations ’ requirements for protection .
And they will do so instead of innovating for the benefit of consumers relative other entrepreneurs ’ offerings .
The result is that innovations are pursued for the sake of being innovations , and not for their contribution to consumers ’ want satisfaction .
In other words , investments in research and development are not directed by the consumer ’ s wants .
Consequently , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ & D rather than the business model—how , when , and in what manner the offering is presented to the consumer .
This is more than an inefficiency in the market system .
It is a change of incentives that fundamentally distorts the market process , its direction , and thus the economy ’ s ability to satisfy actual consumer wants .
The real solution lies in allowing entrepreneurs to be entrepreneurs , and thus , through their imaginative speculative efforts , to figure out how to beat each other in offering goods @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ driving force ” of the economy .
Freeing innovation efforts from their entrepreneurial component is not the way to improve the value for consumers or improve the functioning of the market process .
It is only a matter of providing some producers with profit at the expense of everyone , as well as the economy and society .

Proponents of intellectual property rights often rely on one of two lines of reasoning.
The first is based on the misunderstanding that the frequency or volume of innovations determine economic growth. The second is captured by the question, “So if I spend $1 billion on R&D (research and development) to bring a new drug to market, anyone should be able to copy my drug without compensation?” Both are based on the same fundamental error: assuming that innovation is a matter of production. It is not. Innovation is all about entrepreneurship, and that’s why intellectual property rights do not and cannot help.
The economic growth argument appears to be in line with empirical observation. After all, it is the introduction of and change caused by valuable innovations that make us better off and raise our standard of living. But as is so often the case, observations in economics tend to lead to problematic if not false conclusions. The market is a trial-and-error process under uncertainty, in which entrepreneurs and businesses compete by offering goods and services anticipated to satisfy consumers at a future point in time better than the offerings of others. Then, obviously, innovations are important.
But it is not the number of innovations attempted that matters. There is also scarcity, meaning that a market process that generates a huge number of innovations may in effect produce less value than a process that generates only a few. Quality is more important than quantity, just like aiming the one arrow will produce a better result than shooting a great number of arrows in random directions. Although entrepreneurs hardly have a visible target to aim for, their “division of intellectual labor” places boundaries on what attempts are made. Innovations are uncertain, but not undirected or random.
The compensation argument makes the same mistake but clarifies the error. The issue in the market is not about compensation for investment or effort made, but the creation of value for consumers. We are not, and should not be, compensated for the time and effort we put into something, but for our contribution to value. The reason we get paid at our jobs is not that we get up in the morning and spend our days doing tedious tasks and following management’s orders, but because the entrepreneurs, along with their “junior partners” (management), are betting that this type of production will be valuable to consumers and thus generate revenue that more than covers cost.
In other words, that a firm invests in research and development is not primarily a matter of production, but one of attempting to find solutions that consumers will value. It is a means toward generating sales with revenue that exceeds cost. Such revenue is generated, because this effort turns out to be more valuable to consumers relative to other entrepreneurial undertakings. As Mises puts it, “The only source from which an entrepreneur’s profits stem is his ability to anticipate better than other people the future demand of the consumers” (emphasis added).
The entrepreneurial problem, therefore, is one about better figuring out how to serve consumers. Innovation is undoubtedly a means toward that end, but whether an innovation is profitable depends not on the innovation being new or even costing a lot of money to carry out, but on whether it is correctly positioned with respect to (1) consumers’ (future) wants and (2) other entrepreneurs’ (future) offerings. Both aspects are necessary for the market process to progress and thereby improve our standard of living.
Intellectual property rights, imposed on entrepreneurs generally and thus on the market, mean that entrepreneurs are relieved of the second part of the problem—the positioning relative to other entrepreneurs. This is the purpose of this type of regulation, but what it means is that entrepreneurs can and will overinvest in innovations that comply with the regulations’ requirements for protection. And they will do so instead of innovating for the benefit of consumers relative other entrepreneurs’ offerings.
The result is that innovations are pursued for the sake of being innovations, and not for their contribution to consumers’ want satisfaction. In other words, investments in research and development are not directed by the consumer’s wants. Consequently, what matters is the investment in R&D rather than the business model—how, when, and in what manner the offering is presented to the consumer.
This is more than an inefficiency in the market system. It is a change of incentives that fundamentally distorts the market process, its direction, and thus the economy’s ability to satisfy actual consumer wants.
The real solution lies in allowing entrepreneurs to be entrepreneurs, and thus, through their imaginative speculative efforts, to figure out how to beat each other in offering goods with value to consumers and be the “driving force” of the economy. Freeing innovation efforts from their entrepreneurial component is not the way to improve the value for consumers or improve the functioning of the market process. It is only a matter of providing some producers with profit at the expense of everyone, as well as the economy and society.


newswars--2020-02-06--Ten US Oil Refineries “Grossly” Contributing to Higher Cancer Rates – Report

A Washington , DC-based environmental nonprofit organization is accusing a total of 10 US oil refineries of grossly contributing to higher cancer rates last year by exceeding the Environmental Protection Agency ’ s ( EPA ) standards for benzene concentrations within facility perimeters .
The Environmental Integrity Project ( EIP ) published a new report on Thursday which highlighted EPA violations committed by six oil refineries located in Texas and another four facilities nationwide .
“ These results highlight refineries that need to do a better job of installing pollution controls and implementing safer workplace practices to reduce the leakage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” Eric Schaeffer , executive director of the EIP , said in a statement obtained by the Texas Tribune .
Schaeffer noted that in 2015 , the EPA established “ regulations to better monitor benzene and protect people living near refineries , often in working-class neighborhoods.
” According to the rule , sources are required to “ implement corrective measures ” if the benzene concentration exceeds the action level of 9 micrograms per cubic meter of air around the fenceline .
“ Now , EPA needs to enforce these rules , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tribune .
The environmental nonprofit examined emission reports from more than 100 refineries across the US and found that a total of 10 facilities had emitted toxic , cancer-causing emissions at a level deemed unacceptable by federal regulations .
Mike Adams and Tom Pappert discuss how the Coronavirus outbreak may now be considered a bio-weapon .
Pennsylvania ’ s Philadelphia Energy Solutions , which recently filed for bankruptcy in a Delaware District Court , ranked highest on the list with benzene emissions 444 % greater than the EPA action level .
HollyFrontier Navajo @ @ @ @ @ @ @ close second with benzene levels 300 % above what regulations allow .
Total Port Arthur Refinery , which ranked the highest above the EPA level in the state of Texas at 148 % , told the Tribune that it will abide by EPA regulations and work to lower its emission rates .
“ The Total Port Arthur Refinery has a robust monitoring system in place to assist us in identifying the source of an emission , investigating its cause and implementing corrective actions , ” Total S.A. , the refinery ’ s France-based @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ We are committed to comply with EPA rules .
We take seriously our responsibility to reduce our environmental footprint.
” The remaining seven facilities – Chevron Pascagoula in Mississippi ; Chalmette Refining in Louisiana ; and Pasadena Refining , Flint Hills Resources Corpus Christi East , Valero Corpus Christi East , Shell Deer Park and Marathon Galveston Bay Texas City , all in Texas – reported benzene emissions at 100 % or less above the EPA action level .
“ When compared to EPA ’ s benzene cancer risk analysis , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ represent an additional cancer risk of 4 in 10,000 , when considering lifetime exposure , ” the report noted .
It also revealed that the facilities “ have long-term benzene concentrations that are more than three times higher than California ’ s exposure limit for increased risk of blood disorders and disease.
” Alex Jones breaks down President Trump ’ s post-acquittal address where he called the Dems ’ political with-hunt ‘ bullshit .
’

A Washington, DC-based environmental nonprofit organization is accusing a total of 10 US oil refineries of grossly contributing to higher cancer rates last year by exceeding the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) standards for benzene concentrations within facility perimeters.
The Environmental Integrity Project (EIP) published a new report on Thursday which highlighted EPA violations committed by six oil refineries located in Texas and another four facilities nationwide.
“These results highlight refineries that need to do a better job of installing pollution controls and implementing safer workplace practices to reduce the leakage of this cancer-causing pollutant into local communities,” Eric Schaeffer, executive director of the EIP, said in a statement obtained by the Texas Tribune.
Schaeffer noted that in 2015, the EPA established “regulations to better monitor benzene and protect people living near refineries, often in working-class neighborhoods.” According to the rule, sources are required to “implement corrective measures” if the benzene concentration exceeds the action level of 9 micrograms per cubic meter of air around the fenceline.
“Now, EPA needs to enforce these rules,” he asserted in his statement to the Tribune.
The environmental nonprofit examined emission reports from more than 100 refineries across the US and found that a total of 10 facilities had emitted toxic, cancer-causing emissions at a level deemed unacceptable by federal regulations.
Mike Adams and Tom Pappert discuss how the Coronavirus outbreak may now be considered a bio-weapon.
Pennsylvania’s Philadelphia Energy Solutions, which recently filed for bankruptcy in a Delaware District Court, ranked highest on the list with benzene emissions 444% greater than the EPA action level. HollyFrontier Navajo Artesia of New Mexico came in a close second with benzene levels 300% above what regulations allow.
Total Port Arthur Refinery, which ranked the highest above the EPA level in the state of Texas at 148%, told the Tribune that it will abide by EPA regulations and work to lower its emission rates.
“The Total Port Arthur Refinery has a robust monitoring system in place to assist us in identifying the source of an emission, investigating its cause and implementing corrective actions,” Total S.A., the refinery’s France-based owner, asserted to the outlet. “We are committed to comply with EPA rules. We take seriously our responsibility to reduce our environmental footprint.”
The remaining seven facilities – Chevron Pascagoula in Mississippi; Chalmette Refining in Louisiana; and Pasadena Refining, Flint Hills Resources Corpus Christi East, Valero Corpus Christi East, Shell Deer Park and Marathon Galveston Bay Texas City, all in Texas – reported benzene emissions at 100% or less above the EPA action level.
“When compared to EPA’s benzene cancer risk analysis, the highest emitting facilities on our list could represent an additional cancer risk of 4 in 10,000, when considering lifetime exposure,” the report noted. It also revealed that the facilities “have long-term benzene concentrations that are more than three times higher than California’s exposure limit for increased risk of blood disorders and disease.”
Alex Jones breaks down President Trump’s post-acquittal address where he called the Dems’ political with-hunt ‘bullshit.’


newswars--2020-02-06--UK Supermarket Forced to Apologize For Asking People Not to Steal Female Menstrual Products

A UK supermarket was forced to apologize for asking people not to steal female menstrual products , because shoplifting is apparently ‘ woke ’ now .
It all started with a tweet which received nearly 15,000 likes .
“ We really need a genuine conversation as a society about what ‘ safety ’ means , ” commented Oonagh Ryder alongside an image of sanitary products on a shelf behind a sign which read “ Help us build safer communities – report shoplifting to a member of staff.
” Respondents to the tweet asserted their human right to steal tampons and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be free for anybody who menstruates , ” said one .
“ Women , trans men , or anyone who menstruates should not have to worry about being reported for taking a necessity that I personally believe should be free , ” added another .
And if you think that ’ s the end of the absurdity , think again .
After BuzzFeed picked up the story , the supermarket in question , Tesco , actually apologized for the sign .
Tesco “ removed signs placed above tampons and other menstrual health products @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these items in its store in Kensington , London ” after the signs caused “ mass uproar online.
” The company said it was “ very sorry for any offense caused ” and claimed that the sign was placed “ in error.
” “ Once , rights were meaningful , ” comments the Moonbattery blog .
“ People insisted on fundamental rights such as free speech and self-defense .
But then liberals perverted the word “ right , ” just as they perverted the word “ liberal.
” Now we are told that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other people to be forced to provide us with what we want for free .
For example , thanks to the predominance of feminism , someone else being made to pay for a woman ’ s tampons is becoming a right.
” Apparently , it ’ s now OK to steal things from grocery stores because some ‘ woke ’ imbeciles on Twitter were offended by something .
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever .
It is CRUCIAL that you support me .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ here .
Donate to me on SubscribeStar here .
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown .

A UK supermarket was forced to apologize for asking people not to steal female menstrual products, because shoplifting is apparently ‘woke’ now.
Yes, really.
It all started with a tweet which received nearly 15,000 likes.
“We really need a genuine conversation as a society about what ‘safety’ means,” commented Oonagh Ryder alongside an image of sanitary products on a shelf behind a sign which read “Help us build safer communities – report shoplifting to a member of staff.”
Spotted by @HMPSurvival. We really need a genuine conversation as a society about what ‘safety’ means. pic.twitter.com/jrH2rx6h3W — Oonagh Ryder (@oonskie) January 29, 2020
Respondents to the tweet asserted their human right to steal tampons and sanitary towels.
“Sanitary products should be free for anybody who menstruates,” said one.
Sanitary products should be free for anybody who menstruates — Erin praying 4 u Ryan (@morninggloria) January 29, 2020
“Women, trans men, or anyone who menstruates should not have to worry about being reported for taking a necessity that I personally believe should be free,” added another.
Women, trans men, or anyone who menstruates should not have to worry about being reported for taking a necessity that I personally believe should be free — ✨Scarlet✨|| Sarah Paulson Stan Account (@DismalBabyHands) January 30, 2020
And if you think that’s the end of the absurdity, think again. After BuzzFeed picked up the story, the supermarket in question, Tesco, actually apologized for the sign.
Tesco “removed signs placed above tampons and other menstrual health products that asked people to report shoplifting of these items in its store in Kensington, London” after the signs caused “mass uproar online.”
The company said it was “very sorry for any offense caused” and claimed that the sign was placed “in error.”
“Once, rights were meaningful,” comments the Moonbattery blog. “People insisted on fundamental rights such as free speech and self-defense. But then liberals perverted the word “right,” just as they perverted the word “liberal.” Now we are told that we have a “right” for other people to be forced to provide us with what we want for free. For example, thanks to the predominance of feminism, someone else being made to pay for a woman’s tampons is becoming a right.”
Apparently, it’s now OK to steal things from grocery stores because some ‘woke’ imbeciles on Twitter were offended by something.
Good luck with that, Tesco.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me.
Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-02-06--Nancy The Ripper Vs Trump USA

Nancy The Ripper Vs Trump USA

Trump calls the failed liberal witch-hunt “ bullshit ” – Let the Meme Wars begin .

‘They Are Trying To Break Our Will’: Alex Jones Joins Steve Bannon To Discuss The Midterms & More


newswars--2020-02-06--China Launches Biological Warfare Agenda: Covertly Infiltrates Plane With “Trojan Horse” Coronavirus

China Launches Biological Warfare Agenda: Covertly Infiltrates Plane With “Trojan Horse” Coronavirus Carrier

Editorial note : To all national security personnel reading this from Taiwan , Japan , Korea , Canada , the USA , Russia and other nations , you will want to urgently forward this to your commanding officers , as this story is verified and true , confirmed through our Taiwan investigators .
It indicates a dangerous , global escalation of warfare tactics by a lawless , authoritarian regime that you already know has been dispatching spies to your countries , stealing intellectual property and infiltrating your universities , governments and military weapons research institutions .
China ’ s end @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there is no weapon they won ’ t deploy to achieve it .
On the heels of the bombshell revelation that China has been engineering an “ offensive biological warfare weapon ” that accidentally escaped their BSL-4 facilities and launched a global pandemic , we are now getting confirmation from our investigators in Taiwan that China has deployed a biological warfare attack against Taiwan by seeding an evacuation flight of Taiwan citizens with an infected “ Trojan horse ” human weapon who contaminated the entire evacuation flight .
This is a damning escalation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as the coronavirus pandemic explodes , nearly doubling the number of confirmed infections every 3.5 days ( i.e .
exponential , self-sustained pandemic outbreak ) .
As part of an evacuation operation carried out by the government of Taiwan , the communist Chinese government refused to allow Taiwan to charter its own plane to rescue its citizens from the Wuhan region .
China demanded that its own airplane be used , refusing to follow the Taiwan government ’ s request that “ old women , women with children and children ” should be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the flight .
Instead , China placed three passengers on the flight who were not on Taiwan ’ s list of citizens , and one of those individuals , completely unknown to Taiwan , turned out to be infected with coronavirus .
China now trying to spread the coronavirus across Taiwan The covert operation appears to be a biological warfare attack on Taiwan by the communist Chinese regime , which deliberately intended to infect the entire flight with coronavirus so that infected passengers would further spread the pandemic in Taiwan .
Such actions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the Geneva Convention and various international treaties that outlaw the deployment of biological weapons .
When senior media person Cai Yuzhen accepted an interview with “ Faith ” today , he criticized the Chinese side for a series of actions that were “ black box operations ” … …there was no protective measures for the entire charter plane , and no one knew who was infected .
It was not until the passengers returned to Taiwan for examination that one person was confirmed [ infected ] .
“ This charter flight took @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into the charter flight , the rest of the passengers become a high-risk group .
What can you say to them ?
It ’ s a helpless situation .
How can we use the original method to evacuate the rest of the people ?
“ The worst part is how can a confirmed case get on the flight ?
Once it ’ s on the flight , it ’ s treated the same as the rest of the people , there ’ s no quarantine .
Can you still trust this kind of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fu Chen Shizhong who did his best to prevent epidemics was sentimental and wept , because a confirmed case was like a black hole in epidemic prevention on an unprotected charter plane .
It caused him to shed tears [ for the safety of the people of Taiwan ] … Here ’ s the original Chinese article , for those who are able to read it : China knows its political power will be crippled by the coronavirus pandemic It now appears China is attempting to export its pandemic to Taiwan by swapping @ @ @ @ @ @ @ weapons ” who are known to be infected with the coronavirus .
Given that China already realizes its economic and political future is now uncertain in the face of an exploding pandemic that has likely killed at least 25,000 Chinese , the deceptive communist regime appears to be attempting to cause the maximum damage to Taiwan as a form of lashing out against its political enemies as its own domestic situation turns to chaos .
The nCoV strain of the coronavirus was genetically engineered by Chinese scientists to create the perfect biological warfare @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deployed against the United States , stunning new investigations have revealed .
This underscores China ’ s philosophy of achieving the extermination of its political enemies using horrifying weapons of death and destruction .
This is why China ’ s sudden biological warfare “ Trojan horse ” attack on Taiwan should come as a surprise to no one .
Taiwan is working feverishly to protect its citizens from the malicious , criminal actions of the mainland Chinese regime , but given that China is willing to deploy “ pandemic sleeper cells ” on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is now facing an enormous burden to screen , quarantine and treat patients who may be in various stages of the coronavirus incubation .
For this effort , the communist Chinese regime should be labeled a criminal regime that is committing crimes against humanity , yet the compromised W.H.O .
remains committed to China , even absurdly praising China for its “ transparency.
” Every institution in America — from Hollywood to the tech giants and even the U.S. Senate — seems to be running cover for China , one of the most @ @ @ @ @ @ @ history of our world .
China routinely kidnaps innocent civilians , subjects them to rape and torture , murders political enemies , runs “ education ” camps that imprison Muslims , and even runs organ harvesting factories to generate profits from the international black market of human organs .
China also routinely bullies Taiwan and even threatens global corporations with retribution if they do not bow to the demands of the communist regime .
By any reasonable standard , China is truly one of the most dangerous , evil and destructive regimes on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ designation yet again by illegally deploying a human weapon biological warfare attack against Taiwan .
Why is there no outcry from the United Nations or the WHO ?
Where is the outcry from the scientific community ?
Where is the coverage in the mainstream media ?
It ’ s nowhere to be found , because all the corrupt , criminal institutions of our world have already sold out to the communist Chinese regime .
( Much of the controlled U.S. media is now run by communists .
CNN is now called the “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s biological warfare attack on Taiwan should trigger a considered response from the United States , but so far , no one is even acknowledging this incident has taken place , since it ’ s not reported anywhere in the ( controlled ) U.S. media .
President Trump is likely not even aware this has happened .
The entire mainstream media is lying to you about the coronavirus pandemic and China in particular .
But you already knew that , of course .
Fascinatingly , media lies about the coronavirus seem to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ virus itself .
Dr. Francis Boyle , who drafted the Biological Weapons Act , joins Owen Shroyer on The Alex Jones Show to expose the 2019 Wuhan coronavirus as an offensive biological warfare weapon that the World Health Organization ( WHO ) already knows about .

Editorial note: To all national security personnel reading this from Taiwan, Japan, Korea, Canada, the USA, Russia and other nations, you will want to urgently forward this to your commanding officers, as this story is verified and true, confirmed through our Taiwan investigators. It indicates a dangerous, global escalation of warfare tactics by a lawless, authoritarian regime that you already know has been dispatching spies to your countries, stealing intellectual property and infiltrating your universities, governments and military weapons research institutions. China’s end game goal is world domination, and there is no weapon they won’t deploy to achieve it.
On the heels of the bombshell revelation that China has been engineering an “offensive biological warfare weapon” that accidentally escaped their BSL-4 facilities and launched a global pandemic, we are now getting confirmation from our investigators in Taiwan that China has deployed a biological warfare attack against Taiwan by seeding an evacuation flight of Taiwan citizens with an infected “Trojan horse” human weapon who contaminated the entire evacuation flight.
This is a damning escalation of tensions between communist China and Taiwan as the coronavirus pandemic explodes, nearly doubling the number of confirmed infections every 3.5 days (i.e. exponential, self-sustained pandemic outbreak).
As part of an evacuation operation carried out by the government of Taiwan, the communist Chinese government refused to allow Taiwan to charter its own plane to rescue its citizens from the Wuhan region. China demanded that its own airplane be used, refusing to follow the Taiwan government’s request that “old women, women with children and children” should be the priority of evacuees allowed to take the flight.
Instead, China placed three passengers on the flight who were not on Taiwan’s list of citizens, and one of those individuals, completely unknown to Taiwan, turned out to be infected with coronavirus.
China now trying to spread the coronavirus across Taiwan
The covert operation appears to be a biological warfare attack on Taiwan by the communist Chinese regime, which deliberately intended to infect the entire flight with coronavirus so that infected passengers would further spread the pandemic in Taiwan. Such actions, of course, violate international laws, the Geneva Convention and various international treaties that outlaw the deployment of biological weapons.
Translated from Chinese, via Liberty Times Net: (emphasis added)
When senior media person Cai Yuzhen accepted an interview with “Faith” today, he criticized the Chinese side for a series of actions that were “black box operations”…
…there was no protective measures for the entire charter plane, and no one knew who was infected. It was not until the passengers returned to Taiwan for examination that one person was confirmed [infected]. “This charter flight took two hours. The virus is inserted into the charter flight, the rest of the passengers become a high-risk group. What can you say to them? It’s a helpless situation. How can we use the original method to evacuate the rest of the people? “The worst part is how can a confirmed case get on the flight? Once it’s on the flight, it’s treated the same as the rest of the people, there’s no quarantine. Can you still trust this kind of China?”
The Minister of Health Fu Chen Shizhong who did his best to prevent epidemics was sentimental and wept, because a confirmed case was like a black hole in epidemic prevention on an unprotected charter plane. It caused him to shed tears [for the safety of the people of Taiwan]…
Here’s the original Chinese article, for those who are able to read it:
China knows its political power will be crippled by the coronavirus pandemic
It now appears China is attempting to export its pandemic to Taiwan by swapping seeding evacuation charter flights with “human weapons” who are known to be infected with the coronavirus. Given that China already realizes its economic and political future is now uncertain in the face of an exploding pandemic that has likely killed at least 25,000 Chinese, the deceptive communist regime appears to be attempting to cause the maximum damage to Taiwan as a form of lashing out against its political enemies as its own domestic situation turns to chaos.
The nCoV strain of the coronavirus was genetically engineered by Chinese scientists to create the perfect biological warfare weapon, which would one day be deployed against the United States, stunning new investigations have revealed. This underscores China’s philosophy of achieving the extermination of its political enemies using horrifying weapons of death and destruction. This is why China’s sudden biological warfare “Trojan horse” attack on Taiwan should come as a surprise to no one.
Taiwan’s infectious disease officials brought to tears over China’s biowarfare attack
Taiwan is working feverishly to protect its citizens from the malicious, criminal actions of the mainland Chinese regime, but given that China is willing to deploy “pandemic sleeper cells” on Taiwan evacuation flights, the Taiwan government is now facing an enormous burden to screen, quarantine and treat patients who may be in various stages of the coronavirus incubation.
For this effort, the communist Chinese regime should be labeled a criminal regime that is committing crimes against humanity, yet the compromised W.H.O. remains committed to China, even absurdly praising China for its “transparency.”
Every institution in America — from Hollywood to the tech giants and even the U.S. Senate — seems to be running cover for China, one of the most inhumane, cruel authoritarian regimes in the history of our world. China routinely kidnaps innocent civilians, subjects them to rape and torture, murders political enemies, runs “education” camps that imprison Muslims, and even runs organ harvesting factories to generate profits from the international black market of human organs.
China also routinely bullies Taiwan and even threatens global corporations with retribution if they do not bow to the demands of the communist regime. By any reasonable standard, China is truly one of the most dangerous, evil and destructive regimes on our planet, and it proves that designation yet again by illegally deploying a human weapon biological warfare attack against Taiwan.
Why is there no outcry from the United Nations or the WHO? Where is the outcry from the scientific community? Where is the coverage in the mainstream media? It’s nowhere to be found, because all the corrupt, criminal institutions of our world have already sold out to the communist Chinese regime. (Much of the controlled U.S. media is now run by communists. CNN is now called the “Communist News Network.”)
Surely China’s biological warfare attack on Taiwan should trigger a considered response from the United States, but so far, no one is even acknowledging this incident has taken place, since it’s not reported anywhere in the (controlled) U.S. media. President Trump is likely not even aware this has happened.
The entire mainstream media is lying to you about the coronavirus pandemic and China in particular. But you already knew that, of course.
Fascinatingly, media lies about the coronavirus seem to be spreading almost as fast as the virus itself.
Dr. Francis Boyle, who drafted the Biological Weapons Act, joins Owen Shroyer on The Alex Jones Show to expose the 2019 Wuhan coronavirus as an offensive biological warfare weapon that the World Health Organization (WHO) already knows about.


newswars--2020-02-06--Report: Chinese People Selling Used Face Masks Found in Trash

A New Zealander who lives in China told the New Zealand Herald that “ everything has fallen apart ” and some Chinese people are selling used face masks found in trash cans .
The man , who lives in northeast China with his wife and two children , told the newspaper , “ It ’ s getting worse by the day … everything has fallen apart here.
” The eyewitness was speaking on condition of anonymity due to fear of reprisals from the Chinese government , which has threatened people with 15 years jail time for spreading “ misinformation ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ many areas of the country , the man said even used face masks were being sold for $ 50 dollars .
“ I see old ladies walking around picking face masks out of the trash and then they sell them on the street the next day laughing about it , ” he said .
“ When China says they ’ ve got enough and they ’ re handing them out , they ’ re not , I can tell you that now – there ’ s none available anywhere.
” He added that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them appear new and that fights over food such as eggs and vegetables were also becoming a common occurrence .
As we highlighted yesterday , citing numbers inadvertently published by Tencent ’ s Epidemic Situation Tracker , Taiwan News reported that coronavirus infections are “ astronomically higher than official figures , ” and could be as high as 10 times those publicly released .
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever .
It is CRUCIAL that you support me .
Please sign up for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ me on SubscribeStar here .
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown .

A New Zealander who lives in China told the New Zealand Herald that “everything has fallen apart” and some Chinese people are selling used face masks found in trash cans.
The man, who lives in northeast China with his wife and two children, told the newspaper, “It’s getting worse by the day … everything has fallen apart here.”
The eyewitness was speaking on condition of anonymity due to fear of reprisals from the Chinese government, which has threatened people with 15 years jail time for spreading “misinformation” about the coronavirus.
With shortages crippling many areas of the country, the man said even used face masks were being sold for $50 dollars.
“I see old ladies walking around picking face masks out of the trash and then they sell them on the street the next day laughing about it,” he said. “When China says they’ve got enough and they’re handing them out, they’re not, I can tell you that now – there’s none available anywhere.”
He added that the masks are being ironed to make them appear new and that fights over food such as eggs and vegetables were also becoming a common occurrence.
As we highlighted yesterday, citing numbers inadvertently published by Tencent’s Epidemic Situation Tracker, Taiwan News reported that coronavirus infections are “astronomically higher than official figures,” and could be as high as 10 times those publicly released.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me.
Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-02-06--Straight Actress Criticized For Role in LGBT TV Show Suddenly Announces She’s “Queer”

‘ Woke ’ actress Jameela Jamil responded to criticism that as a straight woman she shouldn ’ t be cast in a new LGBT-interest TV show by suddenly announcing that she was “ queer.
” Jamil , who relentlessly hypes identity politics and “ diversity , ” is set to be a judge on a new HBO dance contest show called Legendary .
“ The news prompted an online backlash from people who said The Good Place star was not representative of the black LGBT community , ” reports the BBC .
Jamil reacted by tweeting a statement that she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only revealed this now at 33-years-old because “ it ’ s not easy within the south Asian community to be accepted.
” She then announced she was logging off from Twitter “ because I don ’ t want to read mean comments dismissing this.
” According to her Wikipedia bio , Jamil has been in a relationship with musician James Blake ( a man ) since 2015 .
“ Here you go , Twitter falls for it .
SHE ’ S GOT A BOYFRIEND .
You don ’ t think it ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” after being criticised for possibly taking a gay person ’ s place on a show ?
” asked one respondent .
Next time a woman tells you that as a man you have no right to an opinion on abortion , just respond by announcing you now identify as a woman .
Same goes for voicing your view on race relations .
If someone accuses you of engaging in “ white privilege , ” just say you ’ re transracial .
And if you face accusations of “ Islamophobia ” for criticizing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ re now a Muslim .
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever .
It is CRUCIAL that you support me .
Please sign up for the free newsletter here .
Donate to me on SubscribeStar here .
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown .

‘Woke’ actress Jameela Jamil responded to criticism that as a straight woman she shouldn’t be cast in a new LGBT-interest TV show by suddenly announcing that she was “queer.”
Checkmate, bigots.
Jamil, who relentlessly hypes identity politics and “diversity,” is set to be a judge on a new HBO dance contest show called Legendary.
“The news prompted an online backlash from people who said The Good Place star was not representative of the black LGBT community,” reports the BBC.
Jamil reacted by tweeting a statement that she now identifies “as queer” and only revealed this now at 33-years-old because “it’s not easy within the south Asian community to be accepted.”
She then announced she was logging off from Twitter “because I don’t want to read mean comments dismissing this.”
According to her Wikipedia bio, Jamil has been in a relationship with musician James Blake (a man) since 2015.
“Here you go, Twitter falls for it. SHE’S GOT A BOYFRIEND. You don’t think it’s odd she comes out as “queer” after being criticised for possibly taking a gay person’s place on a show?” asked one respondent.
Here you go, Twitter falls for it. SHE’S GOT A BOYFRIEND. You don’t think it’s odd she comes out as “queer” after being criticised for possibly taking a gay person’s place on a show? #Mugs #Coincidence #Gayface — India Willoughby (@IndiaWilloughby) February 5, 2020
Next time a woman tells you that as a man you have no right to an opinion on abortion, just respond by announcing you now identify as a woman.
Same goes for voicing your view on race relations. If someone accuses you of engaging in “white privilege,” just say you’re transracial.
And if you face accusations of “Islamophobia” for criticizing Islam, just temporarily say you’re now a Muslim.
Foolproof. Works every time.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me.
Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-02-06--Live: California Candidate Flying “Pelosi For Prison” Banner On Air With Alex Jones

Republican congressional candidate Deanna Lorraine , who is running against Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi , joins Alex Jones @ @ @ @ @ her “ Pelosi For Prison ” banner flying over San Francisco .
Lorraine will also @ @ @ @ @ ’ s behavior at Tuesday ’ s State of the Union speech where she ripped @ @ @ @ @ the address on national television .
Her lawlessness , ignorance and corruption have gone on @ @ @ @ @ the petition at https : //t.co/tpidJDBtgA to support the movement !
Go to https : @ @ @ @ @ !
pic.twitter.com/QT5pggL8E1

Republican congressional candidate Deanna Lorraine, who is running against Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, joins Alex Jones and Owen Shroyer to discuss her “Pelosi For Prison” banner flying over San Francisco.
Lorraine will also share her thoughts on Pelosi’s behavior at Tuesday’s State of the Union speech where she ripped apart her paper copy of the address on national television.


newswars--2020-02-06--Bitter Pelosi Claims Trump Was Drugged During State of the Union

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi claimed President Trump appeared to be under the influence of drugs during his State of the Union Address Tuesday .
The California Democrat , who ’ s licking her wounds following the president ’ s acquittal Wednesday on impeachment charges , made the accusation during an interview Thursday after Trump ’ s speech at the annual congressional prayer breakfast .
Explaining a few of the awkward moments between her and POTUS caught on camera during the SOTU , Pelosi , 79 , claimed she reached out to shake Trump ’ s hand as “ an act @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he seemed “ sedated.
” “ Again , I extended a hand of friendship to him to welcome him as the President of the United States to the people ’ s House , ” she said , adding , “ It was also an act of kindness , ’ cause it looked to me like he was a little sedated – he looked that way last year , too.
” Pelosi later claimed the hand shake snub didn ’ t influence her decision to rip up her copy of the president ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ …He didn ’ t want to shake hands .
That was that .
That meant nothing to me .
It had nothing to do with my tearing up , ” she claimed .
The president took a subtle jab at Pelosi during the prayer breakfast Thursday , saying , “ I don ’ t like people who use their faith as justification for doing what they know is wrong , nor do I like people who say ‘ I pray for you ’ when you know that is not so.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ claimed she “ prays for the president all the time.
” The Speaker ’ s latest claims could signal Democrats plan to shift focus back to questioning Trump ’ s mental health ahead of the upcoming election in November , now that the impeachment effort has gone down in flames .
Alex Jones breaks down President Trump ’ s post-acquittal address where he called the Dems ’ political with-hunt ‘ bullshit .
’

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi claimed President Trump appeared to be under the influence of drugs during his State of the Union Address Tuesday.
The California Democrat, who’s licking her wounds following the president’s acquittal Wednesday on impeachment charges, made the accusation during an interview Thursday after Trump’s speech at the annual congressional prayer breakfast.
Explaining a few of the awkward moments between her and POTUS caught on camera during the SOTU, Pelosi, 79, claimed she reached out to shake Trump’s hand as “an act of kindness,” because she noticed he seemed “sedated.”
“Again, I extended a hand of friendship to him to welcome him as the President of the United States to the people’s House,” she said, adding, “It was also an act of kindness, ’cause it looked to me like he was a little sedated – he looked that way last year, too.”
Pelosi later claimed the hand shake snub didn’t influence her decision to rip up her copy of the president’s speech at the end of his address.
“…He didn’t want to shake hands. That was that. That meant nothing to me. It had nothing to do with my tearing up,” she claimed.
The president took a subtle jab at Pelosi during the prayer breakfast Thursday, saying, “I don’t like people who use their faith as justification for doing what they know is wrong, nor do I like people who say ‘I pray for you’ when you know that is not so.”
During the impeachment trial, Pelosi had claimed she “prays for the president all the time.”
The Speaker’s latest claims could signal Democrats plan to shift focus back to questioning Trump’s mental health ahead of the upcoming election in November, now that the impeachment effort has gone down in flames.
Alex Jones breaks down President Trump’s post-acquittal address where he called the Dems’ political with-hunt ‘bullshit.’


newswars--2020-02-06--Newly Found Monster Galaxy Turns Astronomers’ Models About Galactic Behavior on Their Head

The galaxy , thought to have formed when the universe was less than a billion years old , is situated about 12 billion light-years from our solar system .
An international team of astronomers has completed astonishing new research about an early galaxy known as XMM-2599 which has proved so groundbreaking that it challenges existing scientific theories about the behaviour of the early post-Big Bang universe .
According to the scientists , who recently published their work in the Astrophysical Journal Letters , the galaxy managed to pump out over 300 billion stars by the time the universe celebrated its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shortly after without any explanation .
“ Even before the universe was 2 billion years old , XMM-2599 had already formed a mass of more than 300 billion suns , making it an ultramassive galaxy , ” Ben Forrest , a postdoctoral scholar at UC Riverside and lead author of the study , said in a press statement .
“ More remarkably , we show that XMM-2599 formed most of its stars in a huge frenzy when the universe was less than 1 billion years old , and then became inactive by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ years old , ” the scientist explained .
Dr. Gillian Wilson , study ’ s coauthor and professor at UC Riverside ’ s department of astronomy and physics , said it the galaxy ’ s ‘ live fast – die young ’ approach was odd , and challenges previously established models on galaxies ’ life cycles .
“ What makes XMM-2599 so interesting , unusual , and surprising is that it is no longer forming stars , perhaps because it stopped getting fuel or its black hole began to turn on .
Our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ turn off star formation in early galaxies , ” she explained .
Dr. Danilo Marchesini of Tufts University , another of the study ’ s coauthors , provided more insight .
“ In general , early-formed galaxies should be smaller in mass , because the current model of structure formation is hierarchical –small , low-mass galaxies would be expected to form first , and then they would merge to form bigger , more massive galaxies at a later time , ” he said .
XMM-2599 fundamentally challenges this model .
The scientists collected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Keck Observatory in Hawaii .
Percy Gomez , who works as an astronomer at the observatory , explained that finding the galaxy required painstaking , hours-long observations to determine its mass , distance from Earth , and other parameters .
At its peak , XMM-2599 is believed to have given birth to over 1,000 stars a year .
By contrast , our galaxy , the Milky Way , creates just one new star annually .
The supermassive galaxy is believed to be about 310 billion times larger than the Sun in terms @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Way galaxy , meanwhile , is ‘ just ’ 100 billion times larger than the mass of the Sun .
According to Dr. Wilson , the galaxy ’ s discovery creates a series of unanswered questions .
“ We have caught XMM-2599 in its inactive phase .
We do not know what it will turn into by the present day .
We know it can not lose mass.
” The academic wonders whether the ultra-massive galaxy may eventually attract other galaxies to create a mega-cluster of stars .
Alex Jones breaks down President @ @ @ @ @ @ @ called the Dems ’ political with-hunt ‘ bullshit .
’

The galaxy, thought to have formed when the universe was less than a billion years old, is situated about 12 billion light-years from our solar system.
An international team of astronomers has completed astonishing new research about an early galaxy known as XMM-2599 which has proved so groundbreaking that it challenges existing scientific theories about the behaviour of the early post-Big Bang universe.
According to the scientists, who recently published their work in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, the galaxy managed to pump out over 300 billion stars by the time the universe celebrated its two billionth birthday, only to stop shortly after without any explanation.
“Even before the universe was 2 billion years old, XMM-2599 had already formed a mass of more than 300 billion suns, making it an ultramassive galaxy,” Ben Forrest, a postdoctoral scholar at UC Riverside and lead author of the study, said in a press statement.
“More remarkably, we show that XMM-2599 formed most of its stars in a huge frenzy when the universe was less than 1 billion years old, and then became inactive by the time the universe was only 1.8 billion years old,” the scientist explained.
Dr. Gillian Wilson, study’s coauthor and professor at UC Riverside’s department of astronomy and physics, said it the galaxy’s ‘live fast – die young’ approach was odd, and challenges previously established models on galaxies’ life cycles. “What makes XMM-2599 so interesting, unusual, and surprising is that it is no longer forming stars, perhaps because it stopped getting fuel or its black hole began to turn on. Our results call for changes in how models turn off star formation in early galaxies,” she explained.
Dr. Danilo Marchesini of Tufts University, another of the study’s coauthors, provided more insight. “In general, early-formed galaxies should be smaller in mass, because the current model of structure formation is hierarchical –small, low-mass galaxies would be expected to form first, and then they would merge to form bigger, more massive galaxies at a later time,” he said. XMM-2599 fundamentally challenges this model.
The scientists collected their data about XMM-2599 using the W.M. Keck Observatory in Hawaii. Percy Gomez, who works as an astronomer at the observatory, explained that finding the galaxy required painstaking, hours-long observations to determine its mass, distance from Earth, and other parameters.
At its peak, XMM-2599 is believed to have given birth to over 1,000 stars a year. By contrast, our galaxy, the Milky Way, creates just one new star annually. The supermassive galaxy is believed to be about 310 billion times larger than the Sun in terms of total stellar mass. The Milky Way galaxy, meanwhile, is ‘just’ 100 billion times larger than the mass of the Sun.
According to Dr. Wilson, the galaxy’s discovery creates a series of unanswered questions. “We have caught XMM-2599 in its inactive phase. We do not know what it will turn into by the present day. We know it cannot lose mass.” The academic wonders whether the ultra-massive galaxy may eventually attract other galaxies to create a mega-cluster of stars.
Alex Jones breaks down President Trump’s post-acquittal address where he called the Dems’ political with-hunt ‘bullshit.’


newswars--2020-02-06--Fiat-Chrysler Latest to Warn of Imminent Supply-Chain Chaos, White House Says ‘Don’t Worry’

During an interview with Fox Business on Thursday morning , Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin tried to reassure investors that the outbreak wouldn ’ t seriously disrupt the supply chains of western companies , even as hundreds of factories in China plan to remain shuttered until at least mid-February , though it ’ s possible that these closures could last for much longer if Beijing fails to get its arms around the outbreak .
“ At this point , we haven ’ t seen big issues with regards to supply chains amid coronavirus outbreak , ” Mnuchin told FBN .
Be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ supply chains , the outbreak is already wreaking havoc .
But with stocks back at record highs , markets appear to be shrugging off this risk .
Yesterday , we reported that Foxconn , the most important Apple supplier which oversees the assembly of most of its iPhones , won ’ t restart production until late February , at the earliest .
Alex Jones shares his insight on the explosive interview of Dr. Francis Boyle .
And earlier , the FT published a report claiming that Fiat-Chrysler might be forced to halt production @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the virus doesn ’ t clear up within the next week or two .
The company is already struggling to source parts from China .
Four of the automaker ’ s suppliers have been impacted by China ’ s decision to shut down much of its industrial sector as part of a quarantine that ’ s expected to take a huge chunk out of GDP growth in the first half .
FCA CEO Mike Manley said four of the company ’ s suppliers in China had already been affected by the outbreak , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ parts putting European production at risk .
“ We ’ ve got one high risk supply at the moment that we have identified , ” he told the FT. FCA will know “ whether supply will be halted for one of our [ European ] plants ” within two to four weeks , he added without identifying which plants he was referring to .
Three other component makers “ will also become critical ” if certain suppliers remain shuttered until March .
Toyota , Hyundai , Volvo and PSA have already warned that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ production .
Within FCA , Manley has assigned a team to monitor potential disruptions in the supply chain , and propose alternative sourcing .
But that process will take time because new components would need to be certified and registered if the company makes a long-term shift to new suppliers .
As of this week two-thirds of the Chinese economy remains shut , and more than 80 % of its manufacturing industrial capacity is shuttered .
Toyota ’ s COO said Thursday that the company was carefully auditing its supply chains to determine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ claimed it was feeling “ production tensions ” but nothing more than that .
Analysts at Goldman also disagree with Mnuchin , having projected a baseline scenario of 2pp drag on Q1 growth .
But as Wilbur Ross theorized last week , short-term supply chain pain might have long-term benefits for the US : since it might encourage companies to move more jobs back to North America , where the risks of these types of outbreaks is much lower .
Alex Jones breaks down President Trump ’ s post-acquittal address where he called @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
’

During an interview with Fox Business on Thursday morning, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin tried to reassure investors that the outbreak wouldn’t seriously disrupt the supply chains of western companies, even as hundreds of factories in China plan to remain shuttered until at least mid-February, though it’s possible that these closures could last for much longer if Beijing fails to get its arms around the outbreak.
“At this point, we haven’t seen big issues with regards to supply chains amid coronavirus outbreak,” Mnuchin told FBN.
Be advised: when it comes to global supply chains, the outbreak is already wreaking havoc. But with stocks back at record highs, markets appear to be shrugging off this risk.
Yesterday, we reported that Foxconn, the most important Apple supplier which oversees the assembly of most of its iPhones, won’t restart production until late February, at the earliest.
Alex Jones shares his insight on the explosive interview of Dr. Francis Boyle.
And earlier, the FT published a report claiming that Fiat-Chrysler might be forced to halt production at one of its European plants if the virus doesn’t clear up within the next week or two. The company is already struggling to source parts from China.
Four of the automaker’s suppliers have been impacted by China’s decision to shut down much of its industrial sector as part of a quarantine that’s expected to take a huge chunk out of GDP growth in the first half.
FCA CEO Mike Manley said four of the company’s suppliers in China had already been affected by the outbreak, including one “critical” maker of parts putting European production at risk. “We’ve got one high risk supply at the moment that we have identified,” he told the FT.
FCA will know “whether supply will be halted for one of our [European] plants” within two to four weeks, he added without identifying which plants he was referring to.
Three other component makers “will also become critical” if certain suppliers remain shuttered until March.
Toyota, Hyundai, Volvo and PSA have already warned that the factory closures in China risk disrupting production.
Within FCA, Manley has assigned a team to monitor potential disruptions in the supply chain, and propose alternative sourcing. But that process will take time because new components would need to be certified and registered if the company makes a long-term shift to new suppliers.
As of this week two-thirds of the Chinese economy remains shut, and more than 80% of its manufacturing industrial capacity is shuttered.
Toyota’s COO said Thursday that the company was carefully auditing its supply chains to determine potential vulnerabilities. France’s PSA claimed it was feeling “production tensions” but nothing more than that. Analysts at Goldman also disagree with Mnuchin, having projected a baseline scenario of 2pp drag on Q1 growth.
But as Wilbur Ross theorized last week, short-term supply chain pain might have long-term benefits for the US: since it might encourage companies to move more jobs back to North America, where the risks of these types of outbreaks is much lower.
Alex Jones breaks down President Trump’s post-acquittal address where he called the Dems’ political with-hunt ‘bullshit.’


newswars--2020-02-06--Hong Kongers Empty Store Shelves of Food, Supplies Amid Coronavirus Outbreak

Hong Kong residents are emptying store shelves of storable food and household supplies out of fears China will seal its borders , thus stopping exports to Hong Kong .
Residents have already wiped out supermarkets of rice , toilet paper and cleaning wipes in addition to surgical masks and sanitizers which were already running in short supply .
“ If China stops exporting stuff here , where would we get our necessities from ?
” Asked an elderly lady in front of empty shelves , as reported by Voice of America .
The outlet also reported that there ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on rice — a staple food for Hong Kongers — packet noodles and vitamins , leaving the shelves eerily empty , although there was no shortage of meat and vegetables in shops , ” suggesting that residents are stocking up on food that won ’ t spoil .
“ There has been a severe shortage of surgical masks and sanitizing agents such as alcohol hand rubs and wipes , with many pharmacies posting notes on their windows saying ‘ No masks , alcohol sanitizing agents or wipes available , ’ ” stated Voice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ form outside any shops that announce they have a supply of masks.
” “ Thousands braved chilly winds and camped overnight Tuesday outside an outlet at Kowloon Bay that said it had procured a supply of masks from Dubai.
” Additionally , 10 clinics have closed in Hong Kong due to the lack of surgical masks , and another 400 clinics may soon close if more mask shipments are not received .
China ’ s economic output has slowed down significantly due to the unprecedented quarantine of millions of mainland residents , which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hong Kong .

Hong Kong residents are emptying store shelves of storable food and household supplies out of fears China will seal its borders, thus stopping exports to Hong Kong.
Residents have already wiped out supermarkets of rice, toilet paper and cleaning wipes in addition to surgical masks and sanitizers which were already running in short supply.
“If China stops exporting stuff here, where would we get our necessities from?” Asked an elderly lady in front of empty shelves, as reported by Voice of America.
The outlet also reported that there’s a “there is also panic buying on rice — a staple food for Hong Kongers — packet noodles and vitamins, leaving the shelves eerily empty, although there was no shortage of meat and vegetables in shops,” suggesting that residents are stocking up on food that won’t spoil.
“There has been a severe shortage of surgical masks and sanitizing agents such as alcohol hand rubs and wipes, with many pharmacies posting notes on their windows saying ‘No masks, alcohol sanitizing agents or wipes available,’” stated Voice of America. “Long queues quickly form outside any shops that announce they have a supply of masks.”
“Thousands braved chilly winds and camped overnight Tuesday outside an outlet at Kowloon Bay that said it had procured a supply of masks from Dubai.”
Additionally, 10 clinics have closed in Hong Kong due to the lack of surgical masks, and another 400 clinics may soon close if more mask shipments are not received.
China’s economic output has slowed down significantly due to the unprecedented quarantine of millions of mainland residents, which has also contributed to the stockpiling in Hong Kong.