newswars--2020-09-06--“Bipartisan” Washington Insiders Reveal Their Plan For Chaos If Trump Wins The Election

A group of “ bipartisan ” neoconservative Republicans and establishment Democrats have been “ simulating ” multiple catastrophic scenarios for the 2020 election , including a simulation where a clear victory by the incumbent provokes “ unprecedented ” measures , which the Biden campaign could take to foil a new Trump inauguration .
A group of Democratic Party insiders and former Obama and Clinton era officials as well as a cadre of “ Never Trump ” neoconservative Republicans have spent the past few months conducting simulations and “ war games ” regarding different 2020 election “ doomsday ” scenarios .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , called the Transition Integrity Project ( TIP ) , they justify these exercises as specifically preparing for a scenario where President Trump loses the 2020 election and refuses to leave office , potentially resulting in a constitutional crisis .
However , according to TIP ’ s own documents , even their simulations involving a “ clear win ” for Trump in the upcoming election resulted in a constitutional crisis , as they predicted that the Biden campaign would make bold moves aimed at securing the presidency , regardless of the election result @ @ @ @ @ @ @ TIP has considerable ties to the Obama administration , where Biden served as Vice President , as well as several groups that are adamantly pro-Biden in addition to the Biden campaign itself .
Indeed , the fact that a group of openly pro-Biden Washington insiders and former government officials have gamed out scenarios for possible election outcomes and their aftermath , all of which either ended with Biden becoming president or a constitutional crisis , suggest that powerful forces influencing the Biden campaign are pushing the former Vice President to refuse to concede @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This , of course , gravely undercuts the TIP ’ s claim to be ensuring “ integrity ” in the presidential transition process and instead suggests that the group is openly planning on how to ensure that Trump leaves office regardless of the result or to manufacture the very constitutional crisis they claim to be preventing through their simulations .
Such concerns are only magnified by the recent claims made by the 2016 Democratic presidential candidate and former Secretary of State under Obama , Hillary Clinton , that Biden “ should not concede @ @ @ @ @ @ @ TIP met in June to conduct four “ war games ” that simulated “ a dark 11 weeks between Election Day and Inauguration Day ” in which “ Trump and his Republican allies used every apparatus of government — the Postal Service , state lawmakers , the Justice Department , federal agents , and the military — to hold onto power , and Democrats took to the courts and the streets to try to stop it , ” according to a report from The Boston Globe .
However , one of those simulations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Election Day and Inauguration Day in the event of a “ clear Trump win , ” shows that the TIP simulated not only how Republicans could use every option at their disposal to “ hold onto power ” , but also how Democrats could do so if the 2020 election result is not in their favor .
While some , mostly right-leaning media outlets , such as this article from The National Pulse , did note that the TIP ’ s simulations involved the Biden campaign refusing to concede , the actual document @ @ @ @ @ @ @ specific moves the Biden campaign would take following a “ clear win ” for the Trump campaign .
Unsurprisingly , these moves would greatly exacerbate current political tensions in the United States , an end result that the TIP claims they were created to avoid , gravely undercutting the official justification for their simulations as well as the group ’ s official reason for existing .
In the TIP ’ s “ clear Trump win ” scenario ( see page 17 ) , Joe Biden – played in the war game by John @ @ @ @ @ @ @ campaign manager and chief of staff to former President Bill Clinton – retracted his election night concession and subsequently convinced “ three states with Democratic governors – North Carolina , Wisconsin and Michigan – to ask for recounts.
” Then , the governors of Wisconsin and Michigan “ sent separate slates of electors to counter those sent by the state legislature ” to the Electoral College , which Trump had won , in an attempt to undermine , if not prevent , that win .
Next , “ the Biden campaign encouraged Western @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Washington , and collectively known as “ Cascadia , ” to secede from the Union unless Congressional Republicans agreed to a set of structural reforms .
( emphasis added ) ” Subsequently , “ with advice from [ former ] President Obama , ” the Biden campaign laid out those “ reforms ” as the following : • Divide California into five states “ to more accurately represent its population in the Senate ” In other words , these “ structural reforms ” involve the creation of what essentially amounts to having @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the new states set to ensure a perpetual majority for Democrats , as only Democrat-majority areas ( DC , Puerto Rico and California ) are given statehood .
Notably , in other scenarios where Biden won the Electoral College , Democrats did not support its elimination .
Also notable is the fact that , in this simulation , the TIP blamed the Trump campaign for the Democrats ’ decision to take the “ provocative , unprecedented actions ” laid out above , asserting that Trump ’ s campaign had “ created the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into taking these actions by doing things like giving “ an interview to The Intercept in which he [ Trump ] stated that he would have lost the election if Bernie Sanders had been nominated ” instead of Biden as the Democratic presidential candidate .
The TIP also claimed that the Trump campaign would seek to paint these “ provocative , unpredecented actions ” as “ the Democrats attempting to orchestrate an illegal coup , ” despite the fact that that is essentially what those actions entail .
Indeed , in other simulations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lines , the TIP ’ s rhetoric about this category of extreme actions is decidedly different .
Yet , the simulated actions of the Biden campaign in this scenario did not end there , as the Biden campaign subsequently “ provoked a breakdown in the joint session of Congress [ on January 6th ] by getting the House of Representatives to agree to award the presidency to Biden , ” adding that this was “ based on the alternative pro-Biden submissions sent by pro-Biden governors.
” The Republican party obviously did not consent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ election through his Electoral College victory .
The “ clear Trump win ” election simulation ended with no president-elect being inaugurated on January 20 , with the TIP noting “ it was unclear what the military would do in this situation.
” Of course , some TIP members , including its co-founder Rosa Brooks – a former advisor to the Obama era Pentagon and currently a fellow at the “ New America ” think tank , have their preference for “ what the military would do in this situation.
” For instance , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ after Trump ’ s inauguration in 2017 , argued in Foreign Policy that “ a military coup , or at least a refusal by military leaders to obey certain orders ” was one of four possibilities for removing Trump from office prior to the 2020 election .
Who is behind the TIP ?
The TIP was created in late 2019 , allegedly “ out of concern that the Trump Administration may seek to manipulate , ignore , undermine or disrupt the 2020 presidential election and transition process.
” It was co-founded by Rosa @ @ @ @ @ @ @ director is Zoe Hudson .
Brooks , as previously mentioned , was an advisor to the Pentagon and the Hillary Clinton-led State Department during the Obama administration .
She was also previously the general counsel to the President of the Open Society Institute , part of the Open Society Foundations ( OSF ) , a controversial organization funded by billionaire George Soros .
Zoe Hudson , who is TIP ’ s director , is also a former top figure at OSF , serving assenior policy analyst and liaison between the foundations and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ties to the TIP are a red flag for a number of reasons , namely due to the fact that OSF and other Soros-funded organizations played a critical role in fomenting so-called “ color revolutions ” to overthrow non-aligned governments , particularly during the Obama administration .
Examples of OSF ’ s ties to these manufactured “ revolutions ” include Ukraine in 2014 and the “ Arab Spring , ” which began in 2011 and saw several governments in the Middle East and North Africa that were troublesome to Western interests conveniently removed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the cozy ties between Soros and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton , including one email where Soros directed Clinton ’ s policy with respect to unrest in Albania , telling her that “ two things need to be done urgently , ” which were to “ bring the full weight of the international community to bear on Prime Minister Berisha ” and “ appoint a senior European official as mediator.
” Both “ urgent ” tasks were subsequently performed by Clinton , presumably at Soros ’ behest .
In addition to her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Brooks is currently a scholar at West Point ’ s Modern War Institute , where she focuses on “ the relationship between the military and domestic policing ” and also Georgetown ’ s Innovative Policing Program .
She is a currently a key player in the documented OSF-led push to “ capitalize ” off of legitimate calls for police reform to justify the creation of a federalized police force under the guise of defunding and/or eliminating local police departments .
Brooks ’ interest in the “ blurring line ” between military and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a military coup to remove Trump from office and the TIP ’ s subsequent conclusion that the military “ may ” have to step in if Trump manages to win the 2020 election , per the group ’ s “ war games ” described above .
Brooks is also a senior fellow at the think tank New America .
New America ’ s mission statement notes that the organization is focused on “ honestly confronting the challenges caused by rapid technological and social change , and seizing the opportunities those changes create.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Valley billionaires , including Bill Gates ( Microsoft ) , Eric Schmidt ( Google ) , Reid Hoffman ( LinkedIn ) , Jeffrey Skoll and Pierre Omidyar ( eBay ) .
In addition , it has received millions directly from the U.S. State Department to research “ ranking digital rights.
” Notably , of these funders , Reid Hoffman was caught “ meddling ” in the most recent Democratic primary to undercut Bernie Sanders ’ candidacy during the Iowa caucus and while others , such as Eric Schmidt and Pierre Omidyar , are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Clinton family and even ties to Hillary Clinton ’ s 2016 campaign .
Aside from Brooks , the other co-founder of TIP is Nils Gilman , the current Vice President of Programs at the Berggruen Institute and , prior to that , worked for Salesforce , a major tech company and government contractor .
Gilman is particularly focused on artificial intelligence and transhumanism , recently telling the New York Times that his work at the Berggruen Institute is focused on “ building [ a ] transnational networks of philosophers + technologists + policy-makers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ A.I .
and gene-editing are transfiguring what it means to be human.
” Nicholas Berggruen , for whom the Berggruen Institute is named , is part of the billionaire-led faction , alongside Blackstone ’ s Steve Schwarzman and Eric Schmidt , who seek to develop A.I .
and the so-called “ Fourth Industrial Revolution ” in conjunction with the political leaders and economic elite of China .
They are critics and rivals of those in the “ nationalist ” camp with respect to A.I .
and China , who instead prefer to aggressively @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
capabilities in order to maintain U.S. global hegemony as opposed to a “ new order ” promoted by Berggreun , Schmidt , Schwarzman and Henry Kissinger , another key member of the “ cooperation ” faction .
The battle over the U.S. ’ future A.I .
policy with respect to China appears to be a major yet widely overlooked reason for some of the antipathy towards Trump by those in the “ cooperation ” faction , including those who employ TIP ’ s founders , given Trump ’ s tendency to , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ First ” policies and increased tensions with China .
In contrast , the Biden family is invested in Chinese A.I .
companies , suggesting that Biden would be more willing to pursue the interests of the “ cooperation ” faction than Trump .
While the identities of the TIP ’ s founders and current director have been made public , the full member list of the TIP has not .
However , the TIP ’ s “ sister ” organization , called The National Task Force on Election Crises ( NTFEC ) , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ several of its members are also known to be part of the TIP .
Some of these overlapping members include Michael Chertoff , former head of the Department of Homeland Security ( DHS ) , Michael Steele , former chairman of the RNC and Lawrence Wilkerson , chief of staff to former Secretary of State , Colin Powell .
Chertoff , Steele and Wilkerson , though Republicans , are part of the so-called “ Never Trump ” Republican faction , as are the TIP ’ s other known Republican members .
Thus , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ TIP may be accurate in terms of party affiliation , all of known TIP ’ s members – regardless of party – are united in their opposition to another term for the current president .
Other known members of the TIP include David Frum ( the Atlantic ) , William Kristol ( Project for a New American Century , The Bulwark ) , Max Boot ( the Washington Post ) , Donna Brazile ( ex-DNC ) , John Podesta ( former campaign manager – Clinton 2016 ) , Chuck Hagel ( former Secretary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ co-founder of the Lincoln Project ) and Norm Ornstein ( American Enterprise Institute ) .
Of their known members , the most outspoken is Lawrence Wilkerson , who has fashioned himself the group ’ s “ unofficial ” spokesperson , having done the majority of media interviews promoting the group and its “ war games.
” In an interview in late June with journalist Paul Jay , Wilkerson notes that the TIP lacks transparency and that , aside from their “ war games , ” their other activities are largely confidential .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the current “ combination of events ” involving the recent unrest in several U.S. cities , the coronavirus crisis , the national debate over the future of policing , the economic recession and the 2020 election was the foundation for a revolution in the U.S .
He told Jay that : While it certainly is possible that , in the event of a clear Biden win , President Trump could refuse to leave the White House or take other actions that would challenge the faith of many Americans in the national election @ @ @ @ @ @ @ claims to be specifically concerned about this eventuality and about “ safe guarding ” democracy without favoring either candidate , that is clearly not the case , as their simulation of a clear Trump win shows that extreme , “ undemocratic ” behavior , in their view , is permissible if it prevents another four years of Trump .
Yet , this clear double standard reveals that an influential group of “ bipartisan ” insiders are intent on creating a “ constitutional crisis ” if Trump wins and are planning for such a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s results .
Well before the TIP or any of their affiliated groups emerged to conduct these doomsday election simulations , other groups were similarly engaged in “ war games ” that predicted complete chaos in the U.S. on election day as well as the imposition of martial law in the U.S. following the emergence of unprecedented unrest and disarray in the country .
Several of these I detailed in a series earlier this year , which mainly focused on the “ Operation Blackout ” simulationsconducted by the U.S.-Israeli company , Cybereason .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ U.S. and Israeli intelligence and its largest investor is Softbank .
Notably , Softbank is named by the Eric Schmidt-led National Security Commission on AI ( NSCAI ) as forming the “ backbone ” of a global framework of A.I.-driven companies favored by the “ cooperation ” faction as a means of enacting the “ Fourth Industrial Revolution ” in cooperation with China ’ s economic and political elite .
In addition to Cybereason , several mainstream media reports and a series of suspect “ predictions ” from U.S. intelligence and other federal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ narrative that the 2020 election would not only fail spectacularly , but that U.S. democracy “ would never recover.
” Now , with the TIP ’ s simulations added to the mix and the advent of the previously predicted chaos throughout the country with the 2020 election just two months away , it is clear that the November 3rd election will not only be a complete disaster , but a pre-planned one .
The question then becomes , who benefits from complete chaos on and following the 2020 election ?
As the TIP @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the post-election role of the military in terms of domestic policing , incidentally the exact expertise of the TIP ’ s co-founder Rosa Brooks , looms large , as most of the aforementioned doomsday election simulations ended with the imposition of martial law or the military “ stepping in ” to resolve order and oversee the transition .
The domestic framework for imposing martial law in the U.S. , via “ continuity of government ” protocols , was activated earlier this year under the guise of the coronavirus crisis and it remains in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ groups deeply tied to the Washington establishment and domestic and foreign intelligence agencies have predicted the exact ways in which to engineer a failed election and manipulate its aftermath .
Who would stand to benefit the most from the imposition of martial law in the United States ?
I would argue that one need look no further than the battle within Washington power factions over the future of AI , which has been deemed of critical importance to national security by the public sector , the private sector and prominent think tanks .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the country ’ s AI policy plan to implement a series of policies that will be deeply resisted by most Americans – from the elimination of individual car ownership to the elimination of cash as well as the imposition of an Orwellian surveillance system , among other things .
All of these agendas have advanced under the guise of combatting coronavirus , but their advance can only continue to use that justification for so long .
For groups like the NSCAI , Americans must welcome these AI-driven advances or else , even if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or their civil liberties .
Otherwise , these groups and their billionaire backers argue , the U.S. will be “ left out ” and “ left behind ” when it comes time to set the new global standards for AI technology , as the U.S. will then be left in the dust by China ’ s growing AI industry , which is fed by its own implementation of these technologies .
By keeping Americans angry and distracted by the partisan divide through pre-planned election chaos , a “ New America ” waits in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ regardless of what happens on election day .
That is , of course , unless Americans quickly wake up to the ruse… A “ bipartisan ” election integrity group linked to George Soros , Bill Gates , and the Chinese Communist Party war-gamed several 2020 election scenarios to formulate how to overthrow Donald Trump if he ’ s reelected .

A group of “bipartisan” neoconservative Republicans and establishment Democrats have been “simulating” multiple catastrophic scenarios for the 2020 election, including a simulation where a clear victory by the incumbent provokes “unprecedented” measures, which the Biden campaign could take to foil a new Trump inauguration.
A group of Democratic Party insiders and former Obama and Clinton era officials as well as a cadre of “Never Trump” neoconservative Republicans have spent the past few months conducting simulations and “war games” regarding different 2020 election “doomsday” scenarios.
Per several media reports on the group, called the Transition Integrity Project (TIP), they justify these exercises as specifically preparing for a scenario where President Trump loses the 2020 election and refuses to leave office, potentially resulting in a constitutional crisis. However, according to TIP’s own documents, even their simulations involving a “clear win” for Trump in the upcoming election resulted in a constitutional crisis, as they predicted that the Biden campaign would make bold moves aimed at securing the presidency, regardless of the election result.
This is particularly troubling given that TIP has considerable ties to the Obama administration, where Biden served as Vice President, as well as several groups that are adamantly pro-Biden in addition to the Biden campaign itself. Indeed, the fact that a group of openly pro-Biden Washington insiders and former government officials have gamed out scenarios for possible election outcomes and their aftermath, all of which either ended with Biden becoming president or a constitutional crisis, suggest that powerful forces influencing the Biden campaign are pushing the former Vice President to refuse to concede the election even if he loses.
This, of course, gravely undercuts the TIP’s claim to be ensuring “integrity” in the presidential transition process and instead suggests that the group is openly planning on how to ensure that Trump leaves office regardless of the result or to manufacture the very constitutional crisis they claim to be preventing through their simulations.
Such concerns are only magnified by the recent claims made by the 2016 Democratic presidential candidate and former Secretary of State under Obama, Hillary Clinton, that Biden “should not concede under any circumstances.”
“I think this is going to drag out, and eventually I do believe he will win if we don’t give an inch, and if we are as focused and relentless as the other side is,” Clinton continued during an interview with Showtime a little over a week ago. The results of the TIP’s simulations notably echo Clinton’s claims that Biden will “eventually” win if the process to determine the election outcome is “dragged out.”
The Uniparty’s “war games”
Members of the TIP met in June to conduct four “war games” that simulated “a dark 11 weeks between Election Day and Inauguration Day” in which “Trump and his Republican allies used every apparatus of government — the Postal Service, state lawmakers, the Justice Department, federal agents, and the military — to hold onto power, and Democrats took to the courts and the streets to try to stop it,” according to a report from The Boston Globe. However, one of those simulations, which examined what would transpire between Election Day and Inauguration Day in the event of a “clear Trump win,” shows that the TIP simulated not only how Republicans could use every option at their disposal to “hold onto power”, but also how Democrats could do so if the 2020 election result is not in their favor.
While some, mostly right-leaning media outlets, such as this article from The National Pulse, did note that the TIP’s simulations involved the Biden campaign refusing to concede, the actual document from TIP on the exercises revealed the specific moves the Biden campaign would take following a “clear win” for the Trump campaign. Unsurprisingly, these moves would greatly exacerbate current political tensions in the United States, an end result that the TIP claims they were created to avoid, gravely undercutting the official justification for their simulations as well as the group’s official reason for existing.
In the TIP’s “clear Trump win” scenario (see page 17), Joe Biden – played in the war game by John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign manager and chief of staff to former President Bill Clinton – retracted his election night concession and subsequently convinced “three states with Democratic governors – North Carolina, Wisconsin and Michigan – to ask for recounts.” Then, the governors of Wisconsin and Michigan “sent separate slates of electors to counter those sent by the state legislature” to the Electoral College, which Trump had won, in an attempt to undermine, if not prevent, that win.
Next, “the Biden campaign encouraged Western states, particularly California but also Oregon and Washington, and collectively known as “Cascadia,” to secede from the Union unless Congressional Republicans agreed to a set of structural reforms. (emphasis added)” Subsequently, “with advice from [former] President Obama,” the Biden campaign laid out those “reforms” as the following:
Give statehood to Washington, DC and Puerto Rico Divide California into five states “to more accurately represent its population in the Senate” Require Supreme Court justices to retire at 70 Eliminate the Electoral College
In other words, these “structural reforms” involve the creation of what essentially amounts to having the U.S. by composed 56 states, with the new states set to ensure a perpetual majority for Democrats, as only Democrat-majority areas (DC, Puerto Rico and California) are given statehood. Notably, in other scenarios where Biden won the Electoral College, Democrats did not support its elimination.
Also notable is the fact that, in this simulation, the TIP blamed the Trump campaign for the Democrats’ decision to take the “provocative, unprecedented actions” laid out above, asserting that Trump’s campaign had “created the conditions to force the Biden campaign” into taking these actions by doing things like giving “an interview to The Intercept in which he [Trump] stated that he would have lost the election if Bernie Sanders had been nominated” instead of Biden as the Democratic presidential candidate.
The TIP also claimed that the Trump campaign would seek to paint these “provocative, unpredecented actions” as “the Democrats attempting to orchestrate an illegal coup,” despite the fact that that is essentially what those actions entail. Indeed, in other simulations where the Trump campaign behaved along these lines, the TIP’s rhetoric about this category of extreme actions is decidedly different.
Yet, the simulated actions of the Biden campaign in this scenario did not end there, as the Biden campaign subsequently “provoked a breakdown in the joint session of Congress [on January 6th] by getting the House of Representatives to agree to award the presidency to Biden,” adding that this was “based on the alternative pro-Biden submissions sent by pro-Biden governors.” The Republican party obviously did not consent, noting that Trump had won the election through his Electoral College victory. The “clear Trump win” election simulation ended with no president-elect being inaugurated on January 20, with the TIP noting “it was unclear what the military would do in this situation.”
Of course, some TIP members, including its co-founder Rosa Brooks – a former advisor to the Obama era Pentagon and currently a fellow at the “New America” think tank, have their preference for “what the military would do in this situation.” For instance, Brooks, writing less than 2 weeks after Trump’s inauguration in 2017, argued in Foreign Policy that “a military coup, or at least a refusal by military leaders to obey certain orders” was one of four possibilities for removing Trump from office prior to the 2020 election.
Full TIP document below:
Who is behind the TIP?
The TIP was created in late 2019, allegedly “out of concern that the Trump Administration may seek to manipulate, ignore, undermine or disrupt the 2020 presidential election and transition process.” It was co-founded by Rosa Brooks and Nils Gilman and its current director is Zoe Hudson. Brooks, as previously mentioned, was an advisor to the Pentagon and the Hillary Clinton-led State Department during the Obama administration. She was also previously the general counsel to the President of the Open Society Institute, part of the Open Society Foundations (OSF), a controversial organization funded by billionaire George Soros. Zoe Hudson, who is TIP’s director, is also a former top figure at OSF, serving assenior policy analyst and liaison between the foundations and the U.S. government for 11 years.
OSF ties to the TIP are a red flag for a number of reasons, namely due to the fact that OSF and other Soros-funded organizations played a critical role in fomenting so-called “color revolutions” to overthrow non-aligned governments, particularly during the Obama administration. Examples of OSF’s ties to these manufactured “revolutions” include Ukraine in 2014 and the “Arab Spring,” which began in 2011 and saw several governments in the Middle East and North Africa that were troublesome to Western interests conveniently removed from power.
Subsequent leaked emails revealed the cozy ties between Soros and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, including one email where Soros directed Clinton’s policy with respect to unrest in Albania, telling her that “two things need to be done urgently,” which were to “bring the full weight of the international community to bear on Prime Minister Berisha” and “appoint a senior European official as mediator.” Both “urgent” tasks were subsequently performed by Clinton, presumably at Soros’ behest.
In addition to her ties to the Obama administration and OSF, Brooks is currently a scholar at West Point’s Modern War Institute, where she focuses on “the relationship between the military and domestic policing” and also Georgetown’s Innovative Policing Program. She is a currently a key player in the documented OSF-led push to “capitalize” off of legitimate calls for police reform to justify the creation of a federalized police force under the guise of defunding and/or eliminating local police departments. Brooks’ interest in the “blurring line” between military and police is notable given her past advocacy of a military coup to remove Trump from office and the TIP’s subsequent conclusion that the military “may” have to step in if Trump manages to win the 2020 election, per the group’s “war games” described above.
Brooks is also a senior fellow at the think tank New America. New America’s mission statement notes that the organization is focused on “honestly confronting the challenges caused by rapid technological and social change, and seizing the opportunities those changes create.” It is largely funded by Silicon Valley billionaires, including Bill Gates (Microsoft), Eric Schmidt (Google), Reid Hoffman (LinkedIn), Jeffrey Skoll and Pierre Omidyar (eBay). In addition, it has received millions directly from the U.S. State Department to research “ranking digital rights.” Notably, of these funders, Reid Hoffman was caught “meddling” in the most recent Democratic primary to undercut Bernie Sanders’ candidacy during the Iowa caucus and while others, such as Eric Schmidt and Pierre Omidyar, are known for their cozy ties to the Clinton family and even ties to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign.
The Never Trumpers
Aside from Brooks, the other co-founder of TIP is Nils Gilman, the current Vice President of Programs at the Berggruen Institute and, prior to that, worked for Salesforce, a major tech company and government contractor. Gilman is particularly focused on artificial intelligence and transhumanism, recently telling the New York Times that his work at the Berggruen Institute is focused on “building [a] transnational networks of philosophers + technologists + policy-makers + artists who are thinking about how A.I. and gene-editing are transfiguring what it means to be human.” Nicholas Berggruen, for whom the Berggruen Institute is named, is part of the billionaire-led faction, alongside Blackstone’s Steve Schwarzman and Eric Schmidt, who seek to develop A.I. and the so-called “Fourth Industrial Revolution” in conjunction with the political leaders and economic elite of China.
They are critics and rivals of those in the “nationalist” camp with respect to A.I. and China, who instead prefer to aggressively “leapfrog” China’s A.I. capabilities in order to maintain U.S. global hegemony as opposed to a “new order” promoted by Berggreun, Schmidt, Schwarzman and Henry Kissinger, another key member of the “cooperation” faction. The battle over the U.S.’ future A.I. policy with respect to China appears to be a major yet widely overlooked reason for some of the antipathy towards Trump by those in the “cooperation” faction, including those who employ TIP’s founders, given Trump’s tendency to, at least publicly, support “America First” policies and increased tensions with China. In contrast, the Biden family is invested in Chinese A.I. companies, suggesting that Biden would be more willing to pursue the interests of the “cooperation” faction than Trump.
While the identities of the TIP’s founders and current director have been made public, the full member list of the TIP has not. However, the TIP’s “sister” organization, called The National Task Force on Election Crises (NTFEC), does have a public membership list and several of its members are also known to be part of the TIP. Some of these overlapping members include Michael Chertoff, former head of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Michael Steele, former chairman of the RNC and Lawrence Wilkerson, chief of staff to former Secretary of State, Colin Powell. Chertoff, Steele and Wilkerson, though Republicans, are part of the so-called “Never Trump” Republican faction, as are the TIP’s other known Republican members. Thus, while the “bipartisan” nature of TIP may be accurate in terms of party affiliation, all of known TIP’s members – regardless of party – are united in their opposition to another term for the current president.
Other known members of the TIP include David Frum (the Atlantic), William Kristol (Project for a New American Century, The Bulwark), Max Boot (the Washington Post), Donna Brazile (ex-DNC), John Podesta (former campaign manager – Clinton 2016), Chuck Hagel (former Secretary of Defense), Reed Galen (co-founder of the Lincoln Project) and Norm Ornstein (American Enterprise Institute).
Of their known members, the most outspoken is Lawrence Wilkerson, who has fashioned himself the group’s “unofficial” spokesperson, having done the majority of media interviews promoting the group and its “war games.” In an interview in late June with journalist Paul Jay, Wilkerson notes that the TIP lacks transparency and that, aside from their “war games,” their other activities are largely confidential.
He specifically stated that:
“There is some confidentiality about what we agreed to, and what we’ve put out publicly, and who’s responsible for that, and other aspects of our doing that. The Transition Integrity Project is to this point very, very close, whole, and confidential.”
In that same interview, Wilkerson also noted that the current “combination of events” involving the recent unrest in several U.S. cities, the coronavirus crisis, the national debate over the future of policing, the economic recession and the 2020 election was the foundation for a revolution in the U.S. He told Jay that:
“I want to say this is how things like 1917 and Russia, like 1979 and Tehran, and like 1789 in France. This is how these sorts of things get started. So we’ve got to be very careful about how we deal with these things. And that worries me because we don’t have a very careful individual in the White House.”
Pre-planned chaos – who benefits?
While it certainly is possible that, in the event of a clear Biden win, President Trump could refuse to leave the White House or take other actions that would challenge the faith of many Americans in the national election system. However, while the TIP claims to be specifically concerned about this eventuality and about “safe guarding” democracy without favoring either candidate, that is clearly not the case, as their simulation of a clear Trump win shows that extreme, “undemocratic” behavior, in their view, is permissible if it prevents another four years of Trump. Yet, this clear double standard reveals that an influential group of “bipartisan” insiders are intent on creating a “constitutional crisis” if Trump wins and are planning for such a crisis regardless of the 2020 election’s results.
Well before the TIP or any of their affiliated groups emerged to conduct these doomsday election simulations, other groups were similarly engaged in “war games” that predicted complete chaos in the U.S. on election day as well as the imposition of martial law in the U.S. following the emergence of unprecedented unrest and disarray in the country.
Several of these I detailed in a series earlier this year, which mainly focused on the “Operation Blackout” simulationsconducted by the U.S.-Israeli company, Cybereason. That company has considerable ties to the U.S. and Israeli intelligence and its largest investor is Softbank. Notably, Softbank is named by the Eric Schmidt-led National Security Commission on AI (NSCAI) as forming the “backbone” of a global framework of A.I.-driven companies favored by the “cooperation” faction as a means of enacting the “Fourth Industrial Revolution” in cooperation with China’s economic and political elite.
In addition to Cybereason, several mainstream media reports and a series of suspect “predictions” from U.S. intelligence and other federal agencies released last year had seeded the narrative that the 2020 election would not only fail spectacularly, but that U.S. democracy “would never recover.” Now, with the TIP’s simulations added to the mix and the advent of the previously predicted chaos throughout the country with the 2020 election just two months away, it is clear that the November 3rd election will not only be a complete disaster, but a pre-planned one.
The question then becomes, who benefits from complete chaos on and following the 2020 election? As the TIP suggested in several of their simulations, the post-election role of the military in terms of domestic policing, incidentally the exact expertise of the TIP’s co-founder Rosa Brooks, looms large, as most of the aforementioned doomsday election simulations ended with the imposition of martial law or the military “stepping in” to resolve order and oversee the transition.
The domestic framework for imposing martial law in the U.S., via “continuity of government” protocols, was activated earlier this year under the guise of the coronavirus crisis and it remains in effect. Now, a series of groups deeply tied to the Washington establishment and domestic and foreign intelligence agencies have predicted the exact ways in which to engineer a failed election and manipulate its aftermath.
Who would stand to benefit the most from the imposition of martial law in the United States? I would argue that one need look no further than the battle within Washington power factions over the future of AI, which has been deemed of critical importance to national security by the public sector, the private sector and prominent think tanks. The Schmidt-led NSCAI and other bodies determining the country’s AI policy plan to implement a series of policies that will be deeply resisted by most Americans – from the elimination of individual car ownership to the elimination of cash as well as the imposition of an Orwellian surveillance system, among other things.
All of these agendas have advanced under the guise of combatting coronavirus, but their advance can only continue to use that justification for so long. For groups like the NSCAI, Americans must welcome these AI-driven advances or else, even if it means Americans face losing their jobs or their civil liberties. Otherwise, these groups and their billionaire backers argue, the U.S. will be “left out” and “left behind” when it comes time to set the new global standards for AI technology, as the U.S. will then be left in the dust by China’s growing AI industry, which is fed by its own implementation of these technologies.
By keeping Americans angry and distracted by the partisan divide through pre-planned election chaos, a “New America” waits in the wings – one that is coming regardless of what happens on election day. That is, of course, unless Americans quickly wake up to the ruse…
A “bipartisan” election integrity group linked to George Soros, Bill Gates, and the Chinese Communist Party war-gamed several 2020 election scenarios to formulate how to overthrow Donald Trump if he’s reelected.


newswars--2020-09-06--Police: Portland Antifa Shooter Appeared to TARGET And Follow Conservative Demonstrator Before Killi

Police: Portland Antifa Shooter Appeared to TARGET And Follow Conservative Demonstrator Before Killing Him

Michael Reinoehl , the Antifa activist who allegedly murdered a Patriot Prayer group demonstrator last week in Portland , apparently stalked his victim before shooting and killing him , newly unsealed court documents showed .
Reinoehl , who was killed Thursday night as federal marshals tried to arrest him for the alleged Aug. 29 murder of Aaron “ Jay ” Danielson , said in a Vice News interview that he acted in self-defense to prevent Danielson from stabbing him and a friend .
But Portland police said in court documents released Friday that the incident wasn ’ t a chance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and another man , Chandler Pappas , walking on a street in downtown Portland .
Police said surveillance video showed Reinoehl turning into a parking garage entry after seeing the two Patriot Prayer members .
“ Reinoehl conceals himself , waits and watches as Danielson and Pappas continue walking by , ” a police detective said .
“ Danielson and Pappas do not appear to interact or communicate with anyone and continue southbound on Southwest Third Avenue.
” Danielson appeared to be holding a can in his right hand and an expandable metal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he and Pappas walked by , police said , Reinoehl emerged from the parking garage while reaching toward his waistband .
He and another man followed the two demonstrators as they crossed the street .
Shortly thereafter , two shots were fired , one of which hit a can of bear mace that Danielson was holding and the other of which hit him in the chest .
The account was included in a police request for a warrant to arrest Reinoehl on suspicion of second-degree murder and illegal use of a firearm .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to avoid undermining their investigation and prevent Reinoehl from destroying or hiding evidence .
While the police version of events directly contradicted Reinoehl ’ s claims , it aligns with accusations by Pappas , who said , “ They came up behind us .
They shot my friend and killed him.
” Reinoehl , who had a Black Power tattoo with a fist on his neck , said he provided security at Antifa-BLM events .
He was arrested in July for allegedly possessing a loaded gun in public .
Later that month , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ after intervening in an altercation near a Portland bar .
Antifa and BLM supporters were seen cheering Danielson ’ s death after confirming that he was a supporter of President Donald Trump .
“ I am not sad that a f**king fascist died tonight , ” a woman says into a megaphone to a cheering crowd of protesters .
Camera man who was filming during Antifa murder of patriot in Portland speaks out about what he witnessed .

Michael Reinoehl, the Antifa activist who allegedly murdered a Patriot Prayer group demonstrator last week in Portland, apparently stalked his victim before shooting and killing him, newly unsealed court documents showed.
Reinoehl, who was killed Thursday night as federal marshals tried to arrest him for the alleged Aug. 29 murder of Aaron “Jay” Danielson, said in a Vice News interview that he acted in self-defense to prevent Danielson from stabbing him and a friend. But Portland police said in court documents released Friday that the incident wasn’t a chance encounter and began when Reinoehl spotted Danielson and another man, Chandler Pappas, walking on a street in downtown Portland.
Police said surveillance video showed Reinoehl turning into a parking garage entry after seeing the two Patriot Prayer members. “Reinoehl conceals himself, waits and watches as Danielson and Pappas continue walking by,” a police detective said. “Danielson and Pappas do not appear to interact or communicate with anyone and continue southbound on Southwest Third Avenue.”
Newly released CCTV photos of the Antifa gunman Michael Reinoehl from Portland police show he was walking in front of the Trump supporters, then slipped into an alcove to ambush them from behind unaware. A comrade appears to assist the hunt. pic.twitter.com/LipCH888it — Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) September 5, 2020
Danielson appeared to be holding a can in his right hand and an expandable metal baton in his left hand. After he and Pappas walked by, police said, Reinoehl emerged from the parking garage while reaching toward his waistband. He and another man followed the two demonstrators as they crossed the street. Shortly thereafter, two shots were fired, one of which hit a can of bear mace that Danielson was holding and the other of which hit him in the chest.
Here you can see Reinoehl apparently waiting for Danielson and Pappas to pass, then leaving the parking garage and following them along with the man in the black hoody, identified as Subject #2 pic.twitter.com/8a51yfunXt — Evan Hill (@evanchill) September 5, 2020
The account was included in a police request for a warrant to arrest Reinoehl on suspicion of second-degree murder and illegal use of a firearm. Police asked that the filing be sealed to avoid undermining their investigation and prevent Reinoehl from destroying or hiding evidence.
Here ya go with 90% speed, so you can still hear the speaking. pic.twitter.com/DudNQh9X8g — TV Camera Man Woman Person (@irievibratorlol) August 30, 2020
While the police version of events directly contradicted Reinoehl’s claims, it aligns with accusations by Pappas, who said, “They came up behind us. They shot my friend and killed him.”
Reinoehl, who had a Black Power tattoo with a fist on his neck, said he provided security at Antifa-BLM events. He was arrested in July for allegedly possessing a loaded gun in public. Later that month, the 48-year-old was shot in the arm after intervening in an altercation near a Portland bar.
Antifa and BLM supporters were seen cheering Danielson’s death after confirming that he was a supporter of President Donald Trump. “I am not sad that a f**king fascist died tonight,” a woman says into a megaphone to a cheering crowd of protesters.
Camera man who was filming during Antifa murder of patriot in Portland speaks out about what he witnessed.


newswars--2020-09-06--Portland Rioter Throws Molotov Firebomb At Police, Blows Up In His Face

A Portland Antifa rioter caught fire after running through a molotov cocktail thrown Saturday night , marking the 100th day of consecutive “ protests.
” Video shows the rioter drop to the ground and flail around as comrades surrounded him to douse the flames as one yelled , “ stop , drop and roll !
” Portland Police once again declared a riot shortly after 9 PM , and dispersed tear gas after Antifa began erecting barriers and launching commercial-grade fireworks at the officers .
Dozens of officers arrived to block the crowd ’ s path on Stark Street .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the crowd threw at least three Molotov cocktail-like devices toward the police line .
Another person lit a firework .
One of the devices appeared to wound the foot of a bystander .
The series of explosions prompted police to immediately declare the gathering a riot and order people to leave .
Police forced the crowd east and , within minutes , released tear gas onto the crowd .
When will the Democrats like Gov .
Kate Brown or Joe Biden call a spade a spade and condemn this Antifa violence ?
Democrats @ @ @ @ @ @ @ encampment that is now home to an army of rioting communists that have menaced the city of Portland for over 90 days .

A Portland Antifa rioter caught fire after running through a molotov cocktail thrown Saturday night, marking the 100th day of consecutive “protests.”
Video shows the rioter drop to the ground and flail around as comrades surrounded him to douse the flames as one yelled, “stop, drop and roll!”
Portland Police once again declared a riot shortly after 9 PM, and dispersed tear gas after Antifa began erecting barriers and launching commercial-grade fireworks at the officers.
Ok why not? Angle 2. pic.twitter.com/7QqD27468z — Steve Inman (@SteveInmanUIC) September 6, 2020
From Oregon Live:
Dozens of officers arrived to block the crowd’s path on Stark Street. Around 9:20 p.m., some people in the crowd threw at least three Molotov cocktail-like devices toward the police line. Another person lit a firework. One of the devices appeared to wound the foot of a bystander.
The series of explosions prompted police to immediately declare the gathering a riot and order people to leave. Police forced the crowd east and, within minutes, released tear gas onto the crowd.
Before the tear gas: cops push through flaming barricade pic.twitter.com/kwqtvPuVdI — Laura Jedeed (Misanthrophile) (@1misanthrophile) September 6, 2020
Portland Police arrest antifa rioters overnight. One of them is crying. Their comrades continue throwing projectiles at police, nearly hitting those being arrested on the ground. #PortlandRiots pic.twitter.com/s2e5k5h7eX — Andy Ngô (@MrAndyNgo) September 5, 2020
When will the Democrats like Gov. Kate Brown or Joe Biden call a spade a spade and condemn this Antifa violence?
Democrats have been caught funding a COVID-19 homeless encampment that is now home to an army of rioting communists that have menaced the city of Portland for over 90 days.


newswars--2020-09-07--The Truth Behind The COVID Pandemic & Trump’s ‘Operation Warp Speed’

Alex Jones breaks down the reality behind the overblown COVID-19 pandemic and how President Trump is using it to wrestle @ @ @ @ @ technocrats , as the U.N was forced to admit that its Bill Gates-funded polio vaccine @ @ @ @ @ Third World polio .
Meanwhile , the World Bank ’ s own database shows it @ @ @ @ @ years before China released COVID-19 upon the world .

Alex Jones breaks down the reality behind the overblown COVID-19 pandemic and how President Trump is using it to wrestle control away from the globalist technocrats, as the U.N was forced to admit that its Bill Gates-funded polio vaccine was in fact giving the Third World polio. Meanwhile, the World Bank’s own database shows it was preparing coronavirus test kits years before China released COVID-19 upon the world.


newswars--2020-09-07--Miami-Dade Labor Day Beachgoers, Businesses Could Face Fines for Mask Violations: ‘Mask Up or Pay Up

Miami-Dade Labor Day Beachgoers, Businesses Could Face Fines for Mask Violations: ‘Mask Up or Pay Up’

Both individuals and businesses could face hefty fines for violating coronavirus restrictions in Miami-Dade as beachgoers flock to the coast @ @ @ @ @ in Miami-Dade , one of the areas of Florida hit hardest by the Chinese coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ visitors to adhere to the safety guidelines outlined by the county .
Failure to comply @ @ @ @ @ face covering requirements could cost hundreds in fines .
“ We have fines countywide if @ @ @ @ @ new normal rules , ” Miami-Dade Mayor Carlos Gimenez ( R ) said .
“ @ @ @ @ @ $ 500 for businesses .
Businesses that don ’ t follow the rules can and @ @ @ @ @ ”

Both individuals and businesses could face hefty fines for violating coronavirus restrictions in Miami-Dade as beachgoers flock to the coast for Labor Day.
Officials in Miami-Dade, one of the areas of Florida hit hardest by the Chinese coronavirus, have warned residents and visitors to adhere to the safety guidelines outlined by the county. Failure to comply with even the most basic face covering requirements could cost hundreds in fines.
“We have fines countywide if you fail to follow the new normal rules,” Miami-Dade Mayor Carlos Gimenez (R) said. “$100 for individuals, $500 for businesses. Businesses that don’t follow the rules can and will be shut down.”
Read More


newswars--2020-09-07--Lockdown Advocate Who Predicted 10 Million Dead in U.S. From Coronavirus Raises $80 Million in Fundr

Lockdown Advocate Who Predicted 10 Million Dead in U.S. From Coronavirus Raises $80 Million in Fundraising For Online Learning Course

The author of a viral pro-lockdown Medium post predicting 10 million Americans could die from coronavirus is also the Vice-President of a company that just raised $ 80 million in fundraising for an online learning platform .
Back on March 10th , Thomas Pueyo wrote a post entitled ‘ Coronavirus : Why You Must Act Now ’ which ended up receiving 40 million views and was translated into 40 different languages .
He then followed up with another alarmist piece in which he asserted , “ If we do nothing : Everybody gets infected , the healthcare system gets overwhelmed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ million people die.
” Pueyo went into salacious detail about how exhausted health care workers would break down and die , how they would have to choose who to give oxygen to while allowing others to die , and how hospitals would be totally overwhelmed , with patients lining the corridors .
“ Not just a run-of-the-mill bedwetter , then , but a kind of super-bedwetter .
And a highly influential one at that , ” writes Toby Young .
“ The celebrities who shared his post included former presidential candidate Andrew Yang @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ev Williams , author Margaret Atwood , social psychologist Jonathan Haidt and Harvard Professor Steven Pinker.
” After exacerbating alarmism about the threat of coronavirus , Pueyo is now being accused of cashing in on it .
Back in November 2018 , he was appointed ‘ Vice-President of Growth ’ for Course Hero , an online learning platform that has exploded in popularity since schools and universities were closed due to COVID-19 .
In its latest fundraising round , Course Hero netted an incredible $ 80 million dollars .
“ In Course Hero @ @ @ @ @ @ @ comes as a stark contrast to how the business functioned before 2020 , ” reports Tech Crunch .
“ After launching , the startup waited eight years to raise a $ 15 million Series A .
Now , after going another nearly six years without raising venture capital , Course Hero has closed two rounds in this year alone.
” Did Pueyo , who hired a PR firm to promote his March coronavirus posts , deliberately fan the flames of fearmongering early on in the pandemic in the knowledge that he would cash @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we previously highlighted , a study which illustrated the level to which people had been terrified by the media found that Americans on average believed that over 30 million people had died in the U.S. from COVID , 225 times higher than the actual figure .
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch .
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here .
Also , I urgently need your financial support here .

The author of a viral pro-lockdown Medium post predicting 10 million Americans could die from coronavirus is also the Vice-President of a company that just raised $80 million in fundraising for an online learning platform.
Back on March 10th, Thomas Pueyo wrote a post entitled ‘Coronavirus: Why You Must Act Now’ which ended up receiving 40 million views and was translated into 40 different languages.
He then followed up with another alarmist piece in which he asserted, “If we do nothing: Everybody gets infected, the healthcare system gets overwhelmed, the mortality explodes, and 10 million people die.”
Pueyo went into salacious detail about how exhausted health care workers would break down and die, how they would have to choose who to give oxygen to while allowing others to die, and how hospitals would be totally overwhelmed, with patients lining the corridors.
“Not just a run-of-the-mill bedwetter, then, but a kind of super-bedwetter. And a highly influential one at that,” writes Toby Young. “The celebrities who shared his post included former presidential candidate Andrew Yang, actor George Takei, Twitter cofounder Ev Williams, author Margaret Atwood, social psychologist Jonathan Haidt and Harvard Professor Steven Pinker.”
After exacerbating alarmism about the threat of coronavirus, Pueyo is now being accused of cashing in on it.
Back in November 2018, he was appointed ‘Vice-President of Growth’ for Course Hero, an online learning platform that has exploded in popularity since schools and universities were closed due to COVID-19.
In its latest fundraising round, Course Hero netted an incredible $80 million dollars.
“In Course Hero’s case, the new capital comes as a stark contrast to how the business functioned before 2020,” reports Tech Crunch.
“After launching, the startup waited eight years to raise a $15 million Series A. Now, after going another nearly six years without raising venture capital, Course Hero has closed two rounds in this year alone.”
Did Pueyo, who hired a PR firm to promote his March coronavirus posts, deliberately fan the flames of fearmongering early on in the pandemic in the knowledge that he would cash in later?
Surely not.
As we previously highlighted, a study which illustrated the level to which people had been terrified by the media found that Americans on average believed that over 30 million people had died in the U.S. from COVID, 225 times higher than the actual figure.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Also, I urgently need your financial support here.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-09-07--Cuban Journalist Jailed for Christian Persecution Coverage: ‘They’re Going to Have to Kill Me’

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo welcomed the release of Cuban journalist Roberto de Jesús Quiñones Haces from a year in @ @ @ @ @ Havana “ disgraceful ” for punishing the writer for covering religious persecution on the island @ @ @ @ @ September 11 , 2019 , for attending the trial of Pastor Ramón Rigal and wife @ @ @ @ @ homeschooling their children to prevent the state from indoctrinating them with Marxism .
Homeschooling in @ @ @ @ @ Cuba and both Rigal and Espósito spent two years and a year and a half @ @ @ @ @ for the crime of “ acts against the normal development of a minor.
” Police @ @ @ @ @ for the independent outlet Cubanet , at the Guantánamo court where the trial took place @ @ @ @ @ trial in an attempt to write about the lack of due process and violation of @ @ @ @ @ to teach their children the family faith of Protestant Christianity .

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo welcomed the release of Cuban journalist Roberto de Jesús Quiñones Haces from a year in prison on Sunday, calling Havana “disgraceful” for punishing the writer for covering religious persecution on the island.
Police imprisoned Quiñones on September 11, 2019, for attending the trial of Pastor Ramón Rigal and wife Ayda Espósito, charged with homeschooling their children to prevent the state from indoctrinating them with Marxism. Homeschooling in any way is illegal in Cuba and both Rigal and Espósito spent two years and a year and a half, respectively, in prison for the crime of “acts against the normal development of a minor.”
Police arrested Quiñones, who writes for the independent outlet Cubanet, at the Guantánamo court where the trial took place for his presence at the trial in an attempt to write about the lack of due process and violation of the rights of the parents to teach their children the family faith of Protestant Christianity.
Read More


newswars--2020-09-07--Labor Day 2020: The End of Labor, The Beginning of Technocratic Slavery

Is slave labor coming to a convenience store near you ?
Have the open border globalists found a way to import slave labor without importing people ?
Is automation ( A.I .
and robotics ) replacing human workers a reaction to COVID or implementation of a plan ?
“ Robot ” comes from the Czech word for slavery , first used about 100 years ago .
Today , it has a double meaning — both mechanical slaves and slavery of humans by the technocratic elite .
This play is written in 3 acts and the final act has already begun @ @ @ @ @ @ @ David Knight reports , “ Take a look at this video of a man working at a convenience store from home .
He has a VR system at his home and he ’ s controlling a robot at the convenience store so he can stock shelves without actually going there.
” “ Isn ’ t that nice ?
This isn ’ t something mom and pop would want to do but it ’ s what your technocratic overlords want , ” Knight continued .
“ He doesn ’ t have to be down @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have to be in the same city , he doesn ’ t even have to be in the same country .
They ’ ll be able to find some poor kid in India and have him stock the shelves in Japan.
” “ The first step was to export all manufacturing to China because they had slave labor there .
Some people said ‘ I kinda think we ought to have jobs here in America , it ’ s kinda unethical what they ’ re doing in China ’ .
But The Cato @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other apologists for the globalists all told us ‘ shut up !
Don ’ t you want this cheap stuff from Walmart ?
Look at how your standard of living is going up.
’ ” The second step was to begin repatriation of capital to the US in the name of bringing back jobs lost .
But they still wanted cheap labor so they used open borders — both illegal immigration for unskilled labor and legal immigration using visa programs for skilled labor .
But even cheaper foreign labor is too expensive for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bit more .
“ Like Uber ’ s Travis Kalanick said , ‘ the reason your Uber is so expensive is because of that other dude in the car ’ .
This is the interim solution until they can get rid of that dude in the chair.
” What we ’ re seeing now is the final stage , getting rid of the dude , in 2 parts .
The first step is the capital investment in automation ( robots ) with repatriated cash “ invested domestically ” .
As seen in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will temporarily take the place of A.I .
as it ’ s being developed .
We ’ re told it ’ s a necessary reaction to the world ’ s most deadly virus — COVID .
Without the fear of the virus , there would be no justification for the complication and expense of a remote controlled avatar .
People might question why it ’ s being done and where it is leading .
But the majority of the population is afraid of human contact and sees remote work as a solution .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ expensive dude ” working on VR in his apartment by a much cheaper dude working from any country in the world .
Voila !
Foreign labor without bribing politicians for work visas as labor , both skilled and unskilled , moves to cyberspace and avoids any labor laws .
Political fights over the level of minimum wage will be replaced by fights over UBI ( Universal Basic Income ) levels as the unemployed masses are pacified by a monthly check as their skills and ambition atrophy and they become passive dependents like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ immigration can still continue , in mass , to create division and civil war as the standard of living collapses and prevent a unified revolt against the technocracy .
Read more at The Roundtable Report Harrison Smith , host of the Off Limits News podcast at OffLimits.news points out the hypocrisy of tyrannical governments cracking down on citizens while funneling in diseased migrants meant to break the back of the middle class .

Is slave labor coming to a convenience store near you? Have the open border globalists found a way to import slave labor without importing people?
Is automation (A.I. and robotics) replacing human workers a reaction to COVID or implementation of a plan?
“Robot” comes from the Czech word for slavery, first used about 100 years ago. Today, it has a double meaning — both mechanical slaves and slavery of humans by the technocratic elite. This play is written in 3 acts and the final act has already begun.
On 9/2/2020’s show, David Knight reports, “Take a look at this video of a man working at a convenience store from home. He has a VR system at his home and he’s controlling a robot at the convenience store so he can stock shelves without actually going there.”
“Isn’t that nice? This isn’t something mom and pop would want to do but it’s what your technocratic overlords want,” Knight continued.
“He doesn’t have to be down the street, he doesn’t have to be in the same city, he doesn’t even have to be in the same country. They’ll be able to find some poor kid in India and have him stock the shelves in Japan.”
“The first step was to export all manufacturing to China because they had slave labor there. Some people said ‘I kinda think we ought to have jobs here in America, it’s kinda unethical what they’re doing in China’. But The Cato Institute, The Heritage Foundation, and other apologists for the globalists all told us ‘shut up! Don’t you want this cheap stuff from Walmart? Look at how your standard of living is going up.’ ”
The second step was to begin repatriation of capital to the US in the name of bringing back jobs lost. But they still wanted cheap labor so they used open borders — both illegal immigration for unskilled labor and legal immigration using visa programs for skilled labor.
But even cheaper foreign labor is too expensive for the billionaires who always want just a bit more.
“Like Uber’s Travis Kalanick said, ‘the reason your Uber is so expensive is because of that other dude in the car’. This is the interim solution until they can get rid of that dude in the chair.”
What we’re seeing now is the final stage, getting rid of the dude, in 2 parts.
The first step is the capital investment in automation (robots) with repatriated cash “invested domestically”. As seen in the convenience store remote controlled robot, humans will temporarily take the place of A.I. as it’s being developed.
We’re told it’s a necessary reaction to the world’s most deadly virus — COVID. Without the fear of the virus, there would be no justification for the complication and expense of a remote controlled avatar. People might question why it’s being done and where it is leading. But the majority of the population is afraid of human contact and sees remote work as a solution.
The second step is to replace the “expensive dude” working on VR in his apartment by a much cheaper dude working from any country in the world. Voila! Foreign labor without bribing politicians for work visas as labor, both skilled and unskilled, moves to cyberspace and avoids any labor laws.
Political fights over the level of minimum wage will be replaced by fights over UBI (Universal Basic Income) levels as the unemployed masses are pacified by a monthly check as their skills and ambition atrophy and they become passive dependents like H.G. Wells’ Eloi.
Illegal immigration can still continue, in mass, to create division and civil war as the standard of living collapses and prevent a unified revolt against the technocracy.
Read more at The Roundtable Report
Harrison Smith, host of the Off Limits News podcast at OffLimits.news points out the hypocrisy of tyrannical governments cracking down on citizens while funneling in diseased migrants meant to break the back of the middle class.


newswars--2020-09-07--World Bank Records COVID-19 Test Kits Exported In 2017, 2018

The World Bank website has an active record for “ COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Instruments and apparatus ( 902780 ) exports by country in 2018 ” even though the World Health Organization did not name Coronavirus “ COVID-19 ” until February 2020 amid this year ’ s outbreak .
There is also a record for COVID-19 tests exported in 2017 .
At this time , we await a clear explanation from officials as to why this record exists , and will update accordingly .
Journalist Patrick Howley first reported that NIAID funded Wuhan Institute of Virology scientists to conduct bat coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Howley reported : Dr. Anthony Fauci ’ s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ( NIAID ) actually funded a study on Bat Coronavirus , which was a project that included scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology , the Chinese lab at the center of controversy over their bat research .
That study confirmed in 2018 that humans have died from coronavirus .
Here ’ s an excerpt from the April 4 , 2018 NIAID website entry entitled “ New Coronavirus Emerges From Bats in China , Devastates Young Swine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that killed nearly 25,000 piglets in 2016-17 in China emerged from horseshoe bats near the origin of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus ( SARS-CoV ) , which emerged in 2002 in the same bat species .
The new virus is named swine acute diarrhea syndrome coronavirus ( SADS-CoV ) .
It does not appear to infect people , unlike SARS-CoV which infected more than 8,000 people and killed 774 .
No SARS-CoV cases have been identified since 2004 .
The study investigators identified SADS-CoV on four pig farms in China ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ collaboration among scientists from EcoHealth Alliance , Duke-NUS Medical School , Wuhan Institute of Virology and other organizations , and was funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases , part of the National Institutes of Health .
The research is published in the journal Nature .
The researchers say the finding is an important reminder that identifying new viruses in animals and quickly determining their potential to infect people is a key way to reduce global health threats .
”

The World Bank website has an active record for “COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Instruments and apparatus (902780) exports by country in 2018” even though the World Health Organization did not name Coronavirus “COVID-19” until February 2020 amid this year’s outbreak. There is also a record for COVID-19 tests exported in 2017. At this time, we await a clear explanation from officials as to why this record exists, and will update accordingly.
Journalist Patrick Howley first reported that NIAID funded Wuhan Institute of Virology scientists to conduct bat coronavirus research in an article for National File. Howley reported:
Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) actually funded a study on Bat Coronavirus, which was a project that included scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the Chinese lab at the center of controversy over their bat research. That study confirmed in 2018 that humans have died from coronavirus.
Here’s an excerpt from the April 4, 2018 NIAID website entry entitled “New Coronavirus Emerges From Bats in China, Devastates Young Swine”: “A newly identified coronavirus that killed nearly 25,000 piglets in 2016-17 in China emerged from horseshoe bats near the origin of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), which emerged in 2002 in the same bat species. The new virus is named swine acute diarrhea syndrome coronavirus (SADS-CoV). It does not appear to infect people, unlike SARS-CoV which infected more than 8,000 people and killed 774. No SARS-CoV cases have been identified since 2004. The study investigators identified SADS-CoV on four pig farms in China’s Guangdong Province. The work was a collaboration among scientists from EcoHealth Alliance, Duke-NUS Medical School, Wuhan Institute of Virology and other organizations, and was funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, part of the National Institutes of Health. The research is published in the journal Nature. The researchers say the finding is an important reminder that identifying new viruses in animals and quickly determining their potential to infect people is a key way to reduce global health threats.”


newswars--2020-09-07--Watch: President Trump Roasts Democrats For Discouraging COVID Vaccine Before Election

President Trump held a White House press conference Monday , lambasting Democrats for further politicizing the coronavirus by discouraging Americans @ @ @ @ @ if it becomes available before Election Day .

President Trump held a White House press conference Monday, lambasting Democrats for further politicizing the coronavirus by discouraging Americans from trusting a COVID-19 vaccine if it becomes available before Election Day.
LIVE: President @realDonaldTrump holds a news conference https://t.co/FHxzG2rxZX — The White House (@WhiteHouse) September 7, 2020


newswars--2020-09-07--How Capitalists Improve Human Productivity

To quote the last paragraph of this 2008 article by Robert Murphy , when asked why Austrian school economics should be studied , the best answer is : “ the Austrian theory of capital is the best one you can find if you really want to grasp how the economy actually works—beyond sterile mathematics and static timeless analysis.
” The Austrian school ’ s understanding of capital and production relies upon three main pillars .
First : the factors of production comprise both nature-given factors—namely land and labor—and non-nature-given ( i.e.
, produced by giving up production aimed at immediate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : production in a capitalistic economy requires time and features several stages .
Third : the ultimate source of wants satisfaction—and hence of subjective value—is consumption , which is the sole ultimate end of production ; hence , the farther in time from consumption the output of production is , the less it ’ s valued—in other words , people have time preferences .
What is production ?
It ’ s human action blending commodities ( land ) and human energy ( labor ) in order to attain goods and services conducive to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ direct want satisfaction , the outcome of production is consumption goods ; otherwise—i.e.
, if the outcome is delayed want satisfaction , that is , goods and services conducive to satisfaction in future time—the outcome is capital goods .
As Rothbard very effectively describes it , capital is a way station along the road to the enjoyment of consumers ’ goods .
He who possesses capital is that much further advanced in time on the road to the desired consumers ’ good….Capital goods are “ stored-up ” labor , land , and time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the road to the eventual attainment of the consumers ’ goods into which they are transformed .
( Man , Economy , and State with Power and Market [ 2009 ] , pp .
52 , 58 ) Thus , capital is “ ‘ stored-up ’ labor , land , and time ” —saved resources .
The time element is particularly relevant in understanding capital ; as a matter of fact , capital can be ( also ) conceived as previous human beings ’ efforts whose outcome—i.e.
, advancement toward the enjoyment of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In this sense , Böhm-Bawerk ’ s metaphor is highly illuminating : The boy who cuts a stick with his knife is , strictly speaking , only continuing the work of the miner who , centuries ago , thrust the first spade into the ground to sink the shaft from which the ore was brought to make the blade .
( The Positive Theory of Capital [ 1891 ] 1930 , p. 88 , qtd .
in Rothbard 2009 , pp .
481–82 ) Therefore , insofar as capital is the inheritance of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ analogous to giants on whose shoulders today ’ s producers of consumptive goods are standing : it ’ s the produced but not yet consumed ( and thus transferred into the future ) outcome of human action .
The metaphors of standing on the shoulders of giants , the knife-ore , and the way station are helpful in understanding another feature of capital : namely capital accumulation as length of production .
In fact , the more capitalistic the economy , the lengthier its structure of production—or , if you will , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ current producers of consumption goods are standing .
In other words , even though thinking of a “ capitalistic ” structure of production as “ lengthy ” might seem counterintuitive , it nonetheless makes perfect sense .
Actually , in order to produce more efficiently ( i.e.
, with a lower input-output ratio ) and/or more effectively ( i.e.
, attaining more sophisticated products , such as PCs , smartphones , etc . )
today , some human productive action—blending time , labor , and natural resources ( land ) —needs to have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not consumed ) in the past .
In a sense , capital gives producers a head start when compared to the same production occurring without its aid .
Hence , every single capital good is akin to a segment or brick on a road leading to consumption—i.e.
, satisfaction of wants .
The lengthier the structure of production is , the farther the road can go .
Given that production is ultimately the outcome of blending land , labor and time , we are left with one question : What ’ s the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , it should now be clear that if we trace production far back enough , “ we must arrive at a point where only labor and nature existed and there were no capital goods ” ( Rothbard 2009 , p. 10 ) .
That said , we know that production takes time .
A useful way to visualize the interplay of land , labor , and capital in production is the following : since any conceivable consumption good is ultimately an actualization of land and labor ’ s potential suitability to satisfy human @ @ @ @ @ @ @ original factors ( land and labor ) and final wants satisfaction ( consumption ) is time .
Imagine you are given an egg .
If you want to attain a full-fledged chicken , you will need stored-up grain ( i.e.
, land ) to feed the newborn chick and “ stored-up ” labor to take care of and raise it .
Both land and labor are to be taken away from other employments , i.e.
, saved ) .
You also require the time necessary to bridge the gap between the egg ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chicken—that is , the final consumption good .
So , back to the role of capital : capital allows original factors ’ owners to anticipate consumption which would otherwise be accessible only in later time .
Thus , capitalists make it possible for laborers and landowners to exchange the future goods they produce—which will ripen only in due time—for present and immediately consumable ones saved ( stored ) by the capitalists .
In other words , capitalists perform a service for the owners of original factors , satisfying and accommodating the latter ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ desire to consume sooner rather than later ) .
As Rothbard phrases it , The capitalists ’ function is thus a time function , and their income is precisely an income representing the agio [ i.e.
, the premium ] of present as compared to future goods….Capitalists restrict their present consumption and use these savings of money to supply money ( present goods ) to factor owners who are producing only future goods .
This is the service—an advance of time—that the capitalists supply to the owners of factors , and for which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the interest rate .
( Rothbard 2009 , p. 374 ) But how does it work in practice ?
Look at figure 1 ( taken from Rothbard 2009 , p. 369 , figure 41 ) .
Consider , for the sake of simplicity , only one stage of production ( say , the last one , delivering the consumption goods worth one hundred ounces of gold ) .
Absent capitalists , the owners of land and labor would need : first , to save enough resources in order to buy the intermediate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ previous-stage producers to work with ( but this would be tantamount to becoming capitalists themselves ! )
; second , and more important in practical terms , they would have to wait for the final product to be delivered to consumers , who will pay for it only at the very end of the productive process .
Instead , thanks to capitalists , the owners of land and labor get paid—by capitalists—before the final consumption goods are sold in the market , thus enjoying consumption before the end of production .
However , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ original factors enjoy comes at a price—namely the discount rate ( or agio ) .
That ’ s why landowners and laborers , even though the value they added amounts to 20 ounces of gold ( 100 – 80 ) , will earn only 15 ounces : the difference ( 5 ounces ) is paid to capitalists , who advanced present actual consumable goods ( say , money ) in exchange for future potential ones .
The concept of capital is intertwined with the idea of time and of saving ( storing ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ intermediaries between present production and future consumption , are the key players in every capitalistic economy : they make it possible for present producers ( landowners and laborers ) of future potential consumptive goods to enjoy consumption before the actual end of production—thus satisfying the latter ’ s time preferences .
The price laborers and landowners choose to pay capitalists is the interest ( or discount ) rate , i.e.
, the price ( or agio ) of early consumption .
Symmetrically , capitalists are remunerated by landowners and laborers for foregoing consumption @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

To quote the last paragraph of this 2008 article by Robert Murphy, when asked why Austrian school economics should be studied, the best answer is: “the Austrian theory of capital is the best one you can find if you really want to grasp how the economy actually works—beyond sterile mathematics and static timeless analysis.”
The Austrian school’s understanding of capital and production relies upon three main pillars. First: the factors of production comprise both nature-given factors—namely land and labor—and non-nature-given (i.e., produced by giving up production aimed at immediate consumption) ones—namely capital goods. Second: production in a capitalistic economy requires time and features several stages. Third: the ultimate source of wants satisfaction—and hence of subjective value—is consumption, which is the sole ultimate end of production; hence, the farther in time from consumption the output of production is, the less it’s valued—in other words, people have time preferences.
Understanding Production and Time
What is production? It’s human action blending commodities (land) and human energy (labor) in order to attain goods and services conducive to wants satisfaction. If production leads to direct want satisfaction, the outcome of production is consumption goods; otherwise—i.e., if the outcome is delayed want satisfaction, that is, goods and services conducive to satisfaction in future time—the outcome is capital goods.
As Rothbard very effectively describes it, capital is
a way station along the road to the enjoyment of consumers’ goods. He who possesses capital is that much further advanced in time on the road to the desired consumers’ good….Capital goods are “stored-up” labor, land, and time; they are intermediate way stations on the road to the eventual attainment of the consumers’ goods into which they are transformed. (Man, Economy, and State with Power and Market [2009], pp. 52, 58)
Thus, capital is “‘stored-up’ labor, land, and time”—saved resources. The time element is particularly relevant in understanding capital; as a matter of fact, capital can be (also) conceived as previous human beings’ efforts whose outcome—i.e., advancement toward the enjoyment of final consumption—we can now benefit from. In this sense, Böhm-Bawerk’s metaphor is highly illuminating:
The boy who cuts a stick with his knife is, strictly speaking, only continuing the work of the miner who, centuries ago, thrust the first spade into the ground to sink the shaft from which the ore was brought to make the blade. (The Positive Theory of Capital [1891] 1930, p. 88, qtd. in Rothbard 2009, pp. 481–82)
Therefore, insofar as capital is the inheritance of past human action, it’s analogous to giants on whose shoulders today’s producers of consumptive goods are standing: it’s the produced but not yet consumed (and thus transferred into the future) outcome of human action. The metaphors of standing on the shoulders of giants, the knife-ore, and the way station are helpful in understanding another feature of capital: namely capital accumulation as length of production.
In fact, the more capitalistic the economy, the lengthier its structure of production—or, if you will, the taller the giants on whose shoulders the current producers of consumption goods are standing. In other words, even though thinking of a “capitalistic” structure of production as “lengthy” might seem counterintuitive, it nonetheless makes perfect sense. Actually, in order to produce more efficiently (i.e., with a lower input-output ratio) and/or more effectively (i.e., attaining more sophisticated products, such as PCs, smartphones, etc.) today, some human productive action—blending time, labor, and natural resources (land)—needs to have been performed and saved (i.e., not consumed) in the past. In a sense, capital gives producers a head start when compared to the same production occurring without its aid.
Hence, every single capital good is akin to a segment or brick on a road leading to consumption—i.e., satisfaction of wants. The lengthier the structure of production is, the farther the road can go.
Understanding the Role of Capital
Given that production is ultimately the outcome of blending land, labor and time, we are left with one question: What’s the role of capital? First of all, it should now be clear that if we trace production far back enough, “we must arrive at a point where only labor and nature existed and there were no capital goods” (Rothbard 2009, p. 10).
That said, we know that production takes time. A useful way to visualize the interplay of land, labor, and capital in production is the following: since any conceivable consumption good is ultimately an actualization of land and labor’s potential suitability to satisfy human needs, the only obstacle between the original factors (land and labor) and final wants satisfaction (consumption) is time. Imagine you are given an egg. If you want to attain a full-fledged chicken, you will need stored-up grain (i.e., land) to feed the newborn chick and “stored-up” labor to take care of and raise it. Both land and labor are to be taken away from other employments, i.e., saved). You also require the time necessary to bridge the gap between the egg (a potential chicken) and the actual chicken—that is, the final consumption good.
So, back to the role of capital: capital allows original factors’ owners to anticipate consumption which would otherwise be accessible only in later time. Thus, capitalists make it possible for laborers and landowners to exchange the future goods they produce—which will ripen only in due time—for present and immediately consumable ones saved (stored) by the capitalists. In other words, capitalists perform a service for the owners of original factors, satisfying and accommodating the latter’s time preferences (i.e., their desire to consume sooner rather than later). As Rothbard phrases it,
The capitalists’ function is thus a time function, and their income is precisely an income representing the agio [i.e., the premium] of present as compared to future goods….Capitalists restrict their present consumption and use these savings of money to supply money (present goods) to factor owners who are producing only future goods. This is the service—an advance of time—that the capitalists supply to the owners of factors, and for which the latter voluntarily pay in the form of the interest rate. (Rothbard 2009, p. 374)
But how does it work in practice? Look at figure 1 (taken from Rothbard 2009, p. 369, figure 41). Consider, for the sake of simplicity, only one stage of production (say, the last one, delivering the consumption goods worth one hundred ounces of gold).
Figure 1
Absent capitalists, the owners of land and labor would need: first, to save enough resources in order to buy the intermediate goods worth 80 ounces of gold from previous-stage producers to work with (but this would be tantamount to becoming capitalists themselves!); second, and more important in practical terms, they would have to wait for the final product to be delivered to consumers, who will pay for it only at the very end of the productive process. Instead, thanks to capitalists, the owners of land and labor get paid—by capitalists—before the final consumption goods are sold in the market, thus enjoying consumption before the end of production.
However, this advanced payment that the owners of original factors enjoy comes at a price—namely the discount rate (or agio). That’s why landowners and laborers, even though the value they added amounts to 20 ounces of gold (100 – 80), will earn only 15 ounces: the difference (5 ounces) is paid to capitalists, who advanced present actual consumable goods (say, money) in exchange for future potential ones.
Conclusion
The concept of capital is intertwined with the idea of time and of saving (storing) scarce resources. Capitalists, acting as intermediaries between present production and future consumption, are the key players in every capitalistic economy: they make it possible for present producers (landowners and laborers) of future potential consumptive goods to enjoy consumption before the actual end of production—thus satisfying the latter’s time preferences.
The price laborers and landowners choose to pay capitalists is the interest (or discount) rate, i.e., the price (or agio) of early consumption. Symmetrically, capitalists are remunerated by landowners and laborers for foregoing consumption today to the advantage of the latter.


newswars--2020-09-07--Eyewitness Told Security Guard Mohammad Agha About Manchester Suicide Bomber But Was “Fobbed Off”

An eyewitness said he tried to warn a security guard named Mohammad Agha about the suspicious behavior of Manchester Arena bomber Salman Abedi before the terrorist blew himself up , killing 22 people , but was “ fobbed off.
” The concertgoer approached the suicide bomber shortly before the attack because he looked “ out of place ” at the Ariana Grande performance .
“ It doesn ’ t look very good you know , you with a bag in a place like this .
What are you doing ?
” he asked the terrorist .
“ I ’ m @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you got the time ?
What time is it ?
” replied Abedi .
The eyewitness said he then approached a security guard called Mohammad Agha 17 minutes before the detonation to report his suspicions but was “ fobbed off.
” “ Mr Agha then spoke to his colleague Kyle Lawler about the matter eight minutes before the bomb went off , ” reports Sky News .
“ But neither security control , nor anyone else , was informed about the suspicious activity.
” Both Lawler and Agha failed to properly inform security @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Kyle Lawler not inform the control room or anyone else between 10.14pm and 10.31pm about the report from witness A of a suspicious male , with backpack , on the mezzanine level of the city room ?
” asked Paul Greaney QC .
“ If their failure to do so was culpable , was that the result of inadequate training and/or instruction or , instead , the consequence of individual error of ineptitude ?
” Another woman interviewed by Sky News in the days after the attack also revealed that she reported @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fidgeting with her bag to security but they did nothing .
“ She was looking in the direction of where the explosion actually happened and smirking to herself all night , ” said the woman , adding that the suspect spoke with a foreign accent .
The eyewitness said she was lectured by security for making the suspect feel “ uncomfortable.
” The suspect then disappeared minutes before the concert finished .
Abedi was a refugee rescued by the Royal Navy from the civil war in Libya in 2014 .
“ He boarded @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2014 with his younger brother Hashem and more than 100 other British citizens , ” reported the Guardian .
A debate over the arrival of boat refugees , most of whom are economic migrants , has been raging over the summer after a record 400 migrants crossed the channel in a single day last week .
Over 7,500 migrants have arrived in the UK since January 2019 .
They are given a de facto Border Force taxi service before being loaded onto coaches and housed in hotels at taxpayer expense .
In the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is crucial that we stay in touch .
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here .
Also , I urgently need your financial support here .

An eyewitness said he tried to warn a security guard named Mohammad Agha about the suspicious behavior of Manchester Arena bomber Salman Abedi before the terrorist blew himself up, killing 22 people, but was “fobbed off.”
The concertgoer approached the suicide bomber shortly before the attack because he looked “out of place” at the Ariana Grande performance.
“It doesn’t look very good you know, you with a bag in a place like this. What are you doing?” he asked the terrorist.
“I’m waiting for somebody, mate. Have you got the time? What time is it?” replied Abedi.
The eyewitness said he then approached a security guard called Mohammad Agha 17 minutes before the detonation to report his suspicions but was “fobbed off.”
“Mr Agha then spoke to his colleague Kyle Lawler about the matter eight minutes before the bomb went off,” reports Sky News.
“But neither security control, nor anyone else, was informed about the suspicious activity.”
Both Lawler and Agha failed to properly inform security control.
“Why did Mohammed Agha and Kyle Lawler not inform the control room or anyone else between 10.14pm and 10.31pm about the report from witness A of a suspicious male, with backpack, on the mezzanine level of the city room?” asked Paul Greaney QC.
“If their failure to do so was culpable, was that the result of inadequate training and/or instruction or, instead, the consequence of individual error of ineptitude?”
Another woman interviewed by Sky News in the days after the attack also revealed that she reported a woman who was acting suspiciously and fidgeting with her bag to security but they did nothing.
“She was looking in the direction of where the explosion actually happened and smirking to herself all night,” said the woman, adding that the suspect spoke with a foreign accent.
The eyewitness said she was lectured by security for making the suspect feel “uncomfortable.” The suspect then disappeared minutes before the concert finished.
Abedi was a refugee rescued by the Royal Navy from the civil war in Libya in 2014.
“He boarded the HMS Enterprise in Tripoli in August 2014 with his younger brother Hashem and more than 100 other British citizens,” reported the Guardian.
A debate over the arrival of boat refugees, most of whom are economic migrants, has been raging over the summer after a record 400 migrants crossed the channel in a single day last week.
Over 7,500 migrants have arrived in the UK since January 2019. They are given a de facto Border Force taxi service before being loaded onto coaches and housed in hotels at taxpayer expense.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Also, I urgently need your financial support here.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-09-07--School Calls Cops on Boy Over Toy Gun in His Bedroom

School officials called the police on a 12-year-old after they spotted a toy gun in the background of his bedroom during a “ virtual learning ” session .
And it wasn ’ t just any toy gun , it was a colorful , easily-identifiable Nerf gun which shoots foam darts .
“ A 12-year-old boy has been suspended for having a toy gun he never brought to school , ” reported KDVR , with emphasis added .
“ …On Thursday , Aug. 27 , the seventh grader was attending on online art class when a teacher saw Isaiah flash a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ The toy in question is a neon green and black handgun with an orange tip with the words ‘ Zombie Hunter ’ printed on the side.
” The boy said he wasn ’ t aware the gun was visible during the eLearning session .
“ The teacher notified the school principal who suspended Isaiah for five days and called the El Paso County Sheriff ’ s Office to conduct a welfare check on the boy without calling his parents first , ” the outlet added .
The boy ’ s mother said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they compared the boy taking a class in his bedroom to an actual in-school environment , which she called insane .
The teacher believed it was a toy gun but was not certain , despite the gun being painted neon green and looking like something that shoots foam .
“ If her main concern was his safety , a two-minute phone call to me or my husband could easily have alleviated this whole situation to where I told them it was fake , ” the mother said .
Interestingly , the school revealed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ without parental permission after a sheriff ’ s deputy showed the video to the boy ’ s father .
This revelation came after other parents complained to school officials about how they handled the situation .
People are being increasingly harassed by mobs while eating at restaurants .

School officials called the police on a 12-year-old after they spotted a toy gun in the background of his bedroom during a “virtual learning” session.
And it wasn’t just any toy gun, it was a colorful, easily-identifiable Nerf gun which shoots foam darts.
“A 12-year-old boy has been suspended for having a toy gun he never brought to school,” reported KDVR, with emphasis added. “…On Thursday, Aug. 27, the seventh grader was attending on online art class when a teacher saw Isaiah flash a toy gun across his computer screen.”
“The toy in question is a neon green and black handgun with an orange tip with the words ‘Zombie Hunter’ printed on the side.”
The boy said he wasn’t aware the gun was visible during the eLearning session.
“The teacher notified the school principal who suspended Isaiah for five days and called the El Paso County Sheriff’s Office to conduct a welfare check on the boy without calling his parents first,” the outlet added.
The boy’s mother said the cops threatened to press charges because they compared the boy taking a class in his bedroom to an actual in-school environment, which she called insane.
The teacher believed it was a toy gun but was not certain, despite the gun being painted neon green and looking like something that shoots foam.
“If her main concern was his safety, a two-minute phone call to me or my husband could easily have alleviated this whole situation to where I told them it was fake,” the mother said.
Interestingly, the school revealed it was recording students in their homes without parental permission after a sheriff’s deputy showed the video to the boy’s father.
This revelation came after other parents complained to school officials about how they handled the situation.
People are being increasingly harassed by mobs while eating at restaurants.