newswars--2020-08-12--Are Negative Rates a Natural Historical Development?

Negative interest rates have long since become a reality .
But we are not talking about negative real interest rates .
This is the case when the return on an investment is lower than the officially stated inflation rate .
In today ’ s context , negative interest rates are rather negative nominal interest rates ; that is , the nominal interest rate is below 0 percent .
This type of negative interest rate already existed once in the 1970s .
At that time , Switzerland introduced a “ commission ” of 2 percent per quarter on bank deposits at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ inhibit the inflow of new capital into Switzerland .
The fixed exchange rates of the Bretton Woods system still prevented the Swiss franc from appreciating at that time , but the money supply expanded sharply from 2.1 percent in 1966 to 10.9 percent in 1968 .
This increased inflationary pressure on Switzerland .
Negative interest rates were imposed in 1972 , but they were declared ineffective and abolished after 1978 .
On June 11 , 2014 , the European Central Bank ( ECB ) became the first major central bank to set a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The Swiss National Bank ( SNB ) went furthest in 2015 and imposed a negative interest rate on deposits of –0.75 percent .
At present , the SNB is still at –0.75 percent , while the ECB is close on its heels at –0.5 percent .
The Danish central bank has now also caught up with the Swiss national bank , setting its interest rate at –0.75 percent , while Japan ’ s target rate is –0.1 percent .
These key interest rates , which are set by the central banks , have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ via arbitrage effects .
Negative interest rates currently exist along the entire spectrum of the yield curve .
In Switzerland , for example , most government bonds and papers , even the thirty-year Swiss Confederation bonds , have negative yields .
And even corporate bonds are currently yielding negative returns .
The existence of negative interest rates has led to a discussion about their origin .
One side sees negative interest rates as an interventionist measure on the part of central banks .
By mandate , they artificially lower interest rates .
Some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ outright manipulation of interest rates .
On the other hand , some argue that it is much more likely that the continuous fall in interest rates , even to the point of becoming negative , corresponds to the normal course of economic history .
Negative interest rates are no deliberate decision by central banks , but ultimately a natural development .
Harvard economist Paul Schmelzing has written of the supersecular decline that is currently unfolding in this context .
Some exponents of this side of the spectrum are even absolving the central banks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by negative interest rates .
A popular theory among economists that attributes negative interest rates to a natural development is that of a “ savings glut.
” Since more and more people in Western countries are saving today , partly due to demographic change , a glut of savings is steadily reducing the marginal utility of additional savings and thus their marginal returns .
As a matter of fact , in the Western world we have built up enormous economic capital over the past two centuries .
Increasing division of labor and knowledge @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
But greater masses of ( financial ) liquidity are also the deliberate result of central bank action .
Through decades of open market policy , they have created ever more liquidity .
These open market operations by central banks are ultimately equivalent to the purchase of government bonds .
This ongoing demand for government securities from central banks is attracting more and more bond traders , who hope to make a business out of it .
After all , they can sell previously purchased bonds to central banks with virtually no risk @ @ @ @ @ @ @ happened particularly over the past four decades—the interest rates on these bonds fall .
But the fact that we have negative interest rates today is difficult to understand from the perspective of human action .
Negative interest rates mean that you give up something today and are guaranteed to receive less in return in the future .
Intuitively , it should be the other way around : because the present is more certain , it must be more valuable in the face of an uncertain future .
So anyone who gives up something @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and uncertainty that this person is willing to venture upon .
A negative interest rate environment , in which the present is worse off economically and materially than the future , appears counterintuitive and can therefore hardly be a natural development .
It seems rather likely that negative interest rates should be interpreted as a consequence of interventionist central bank policies .
According to many central bankers , these negative interest rates are an instrument of monetary policy .
Representatives at the Swiss National Bank argue that they are intended to counteract the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ECB argues that commercial banks that have reserve deposits with the central bank should be urged via negative interest on these deposits to pass these reserves on to the economy by giving out loans of all kinds .
Listening to central banks themselves , it pretty much sounds like see negative interest rates as an instrument to steer , guide , and control a currency area .
So central bankers themselves implicitly state that negative interest rates are a deliberate tool and not just some unfortunate historical stroke of fate .

Negative interest rates have long since become a reality.
But we are not talking about negative real interest rates. This is the case when the return on an investment is lower than the officially stated inflation rate. In today’s context, negative interest rates are rather negative nominal interest rates; that is, the nominal interest rate is below 0 percent.
This type of negative interest rate already existed once in the 1970s. At that time, Switzerland introduced a “commission” of 2 percent per quarter on bank deposits at Swiss banks. This was intended to inhibit the inflow of new capital into Switzerland. The fixed exchange rates of the Bretton Woods system still prevented the Swiss franc from appreciating at that time, but the money supply expanded sharply from 2.1 percent in 1966 to 10.9 percent in 1968. This increased inflationary pressure on Switzerland. Negative interest rates were imposed in 1972, but they were declared ineffective and abolished after 1978.
On June 11, 2014, the European Central Bank (ECB) became the first major central bank to set a negative deposit rate of –0.1 percent. The Swiss National Bank (SNB) went furthest in 2015 and imposed a negative interest rate on deposits of –0.75 percent. At present, the SNB is still at –0.75 percent, while the ECB is close on its heels at –0.5 percent. The Danish central bank has now also caught up with the Swiss national bank, setting its interest rate at –0.75 percent, while Japan’s target rate is –0.1 percent.
These key interest rates, which are set by the central banks, have an impact on money and capital markets via arbitrage effects. Negative interest rates currently exist along the entire spectrum of the yield curve. In Switzerland, for example, most government bonds and papers, even the thirty-year Swiss Confederation bonds, have negative yields. And even corporate bonds are currently yielding negative returns.
Intervention or Market Forces?
The existence of negative interest rates has led to a discussion about their origin. One side sees negative interest rates as an interventionist measure on the part of central banks. By mandate, they artificially lower interest rates. Some opponents even consider this to be an outright manipulation of interest rates.
On the other hand, some argue that it is much more likely that the continuous fall in interest rates, even to the point of becoming negative, corresponds to the normal course of economic history. Negative interest rates are no deliberate decision by central banks, but ultimately a natural development. Harvard economist Paul Schmelzing has written of the supersecular decline that is currently unfolding in this context. Some exponents of this side of the spectrum are even absolving the central banks of responsibility for any negative consequences caused by negative interest rates.
A popular theory among economists that attributes negative interest rates to a natural development is that of a “savings glut.” Since more and more people in Western countries are saving today, partly due to demographic change, a glut of savings is steadily reducing the marginal utility of additional savings and thus their marginal returns.
As a matter of fact, in the Western world we have built up enormous economic capital over the past two centuries. Increasing division of labor and knowledge have played a major role in this. But greater masses of (financial) liquidity are also the deliberate result of central bank action. Through decades of open market policy, they have created ever more liquidity.
These open market operations by central banks are ultimately equivalent to the purchase of government bonds. This ongoing demand for government securities from central banks is attracting more and more bond traders, who hope to make a business out of it. After all, they can sell previously purchased bonds to central banks with virtually no risk. If bond prices rise—and this has happened particularly over the past four decades—the interest rates on these bonds fall.
Against Common Sense
But the fact that we have negative interest rates today is difficult to understand from the perspective of human action. Negative interest rates mean that you give up something today and are guaranteed to receive less in return in the future. Intuitively, it should be the other way around: because the present is more certain, it must be more valuable in the face of an uncertain future. So anyone who gives up something today should be rewarded for the risk and uncertainty that this person is willing to venture upon.
A negative interest rate environment, in which the present is worse off economically and materially than the future, appears counterintuitive and can therefore hardly be a natural development. It seems rather likely that negative interest rates should be interpreted as a consequence of interventionist central bank policies.
According to many central bankers, these negative interest rates are an instrument of monetary policy. Representatives at the Swiss National Bank argue that they are intended to counteract the appreciation of the Swiss currency. The ECB argues that commercial banks that have reserve deposits with the central bank should be urged via negative interest on these deposits to pass these reserves on to the economy by giving out loans of all kinds.
Listening to central banks themselves, it pretty much sounds like see negative interest rates as an instrument to steer, guide, and control a currency area. So central bankers themselves implicitly state that negative interest rates are a deliberate tool and not just some unfortunate historical stroke of fate.


newswars--2020-08-12--Beijing Warns Washington After US Health Chief’s Visit to Taiwan

Attempts to meddle with Taiwan , which Beijing considers its territory , may cost the US dearly , the Chinese Foreign Ministry said .
He advised its health chief to focus on the Covid-19 crisis at home instead of making foreign trips .
US Health Secretary Alex Azar landed in Taiwan on Sunday for a three-day trip , becoming the highest-ranking American official to visit the self-governed island , which has shown no desire in four decades to reunite with mainland China .
Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian has condemned the visit and warned Washington against making advances towards @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s core interests … the US must not harbor illusions .
Those who play with fire will get burned.
” The trip came amid increasing tensions between Washington and Beijing , and was used by Azar to launch another attack on China .
He blamed Beijing for not warning the international community about the coronavirus , which originated in Wuhan at the end of last year , and refusing to cooperate with others in tackling the disease , thus allowing it to spread around the globe .
Azar also suggested that if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Taiwan or the US , it could ’ ve been “ snuffed out easily.
” The Chinese spokesman denied US claims of poor handling of Covid-19 and expressed surprise that the US Health Secretary had decided to leave his country when the coronavirus is “ out of control ” there .
The US has the worst situation with Covid-19 in the world , having already registered more than five million cases and over 164,000 deaths .
“ He ignored millions of Americans suffering from the virus and went to Taiwan to put @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s “ behavior proves once again that , in the eyes of US politicians , American lives mean nothing when compared with their selfish political gains , ” Zhao added .
Despite severing official ties with Taiwan in favor of China back in 1979 , the US actively backs the island ’ s push for independence and remains its biggest arms supplier .
Only last month , the State Department approved a $ 620 million package to upgrade Taiwan ’ s Patriot surface-to-air missiles system , to which Beijing reacted by saying that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the main contractors in the project , US weapons maker Lockheed Martin .
Beijing has demanded on numerous occasions that arms deliveries to Taiwan be stopped , pointing out that they violate the ‘ One China ’ principle and further deteriorate bilateral relations with Washington .
John Paul Rice of norestrictionsent.com joins The Alex Jones Show to break down why he was censored on Amazon for his film dramatizing and exposing child trafficking .

Attempts to meddle with Taiwan, which Beijing considers its territory, may cost the US dearly, the Chinese Foreign Ministry said.
He advised its health chief to focus on the Covid-19 crisis at home instead of making foreign trips.
US Health Secretary Alex Azar landed in Taiwan on Sunday for a three-day trip, becoming the highest-ranking American official to visit the self-governed island, which has shown no desire in four decades to reunite with mainland China.
Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian has condemned the visit and warned Washington against making advances towards Taiwan.
“On issues involving China’s core interests … the US must not harbor illusions. Those who play with fire will get burned.”
The trip came amid increasing tensions between Washington and Beijing, and was used by Azar to launch another attack on China. He blamed Beijing for not warning the international community about the coronavirus, which originated in Wuhan at the end of last year, and refusing to cooperate with others in tackling the disease, thus allowing it to spread around the globe. Azar also suggested that if the initial Covid-19 outbreak had taken place in Taiwan or the US, it could’ve been “snuffed out easily.”
The Chinese spokesman denied US claims of poor handling of Covid-19 and expressed surprise that the US Health Secretary had decided to leave his country when the coronavirus is “out of control” there. The US has the worst situation with Covid-19 in the world, having already registered more than five million cases and over 164,000 deaths.
“He ignored millions of Americans suffering from the virus and went to Taiwan to put on a political show.”
Azar’s “behavior proves once again that, in the eyes of US politicians, American lives mean nothing when compared with their selfish political gains,” Zhao added.
Despite severing official ties with Taiwan in favor of China back in 1979, the US actively backs the island’s push for independence and remains its biggest arms supplier.
Only last month, the State Department approved a $620 million package to upgrade Taiwan’s Patriot surface-to-air missiles system, to which Beijing reacted by saying that it will impose sanctions on one of the main contractors in the project, US weapons maker Lockheed Martin.
Beijing has demanded on numerous occasions that arms deliveries to Taiwan be stopped, pointing out that they violate the ‘One China’ principle and further deteriorate bilateral relations with Washington.
John Paul Rice of norestrictionsent.com joins The Alex Jones Show to break down why he was censored on Amazon for his film dramatizing and exposing child trafficking.


newswars--2020-08-12--Soros Warns: Trump Will ‘Be Held Accountable’ For ‘Violating The Constitution’

Billionaire globalist George Soros issued a stark warning to President Trump that he will answer for his actions during his time in office .
In a “ birthday interview ” with Italy ’ s La Repubblica newspaper on Wednesday , Soros claimed Trump is “ fighting for his life ” because he knows his enemies will punish him for “ undermining democracy.
” “ But even in the United States , a confidence trickster like Trump can be elected president and undermine democracy from within , ” Soros said .
Soros then claimed he was “ confident ” Trump would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ calling him a “ transitory phenomenon.
” “ But in the U.S. you have a great tradition of checks and balances and established rules , ” Soros said .
“ And above all you have the Constitution .
So I am confident that Trump will turn out to be a transitory phenomenon , hopefully ending in November.
” The 90-year-old Hungarian leftist then gaslighted that Trump is “ fighting for his life ” because he “ violated the Constitution ” , even though it ’ s the left who has been constantly attacking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ arms , and due process .
Trump “ remains very dangerous , he ’ s fighting for his life and he will do anything to stay in power , because he has violated the Constitution in many different ways and if he loses the presidency he will be held accountable , ” he added .
As we reported , an election “ integrity ” group linked to Soros recently war-gamed different presidential election scenarios , telegraphing via The New York Times that Democrats have no intention of accepting a Trump win and will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ states like Washington and Oregon to secede from the United States in support of Joe Biden .
A “ bipartisan ” election integrity group linked to George Soros , Bill Gates , and the Chinese Communist Party war-gamed several 2020 election scenarios to formulate how to overthrow Donald Trump if he ’ s reelected .

Billionaire globalist George Soros issued a stark warning to President Trump that he will answer for his actions during his time in office.
In a “birthday interview” with Italy’s La Repubblica newspaper on Wednesday, Soros claimed Trump is “fighting for his life” because he knows his enemies will punish him for “undermining democracy.”
“But even in the United States, a confidence trickster like Trump can be elected president and undermine democracy from within,” Soros said.
Soros then claimed he was “confident” Trump would be removed from office in November, calling him a “transitory phenomenon.”
“But in the U.S. you have a great tradition of checks and balances and established rules,” Soros said. “And above all you have the Constitution. So I am confident that Trump will turn out to be a transitory phenomenon, hopefully ending in November.”
The 90-year-old Hungarian leftist then gaslighted that Trump is “fighting for his life” because he “violated the Constitution”, even though it’s the left who has been constantly attacking free speech, the right to bear arms, and due process.
Trump “remains very dangerous, he’s fighting for his life and he will do anything to stay in power, because he has violated the Constitution in many different ways and if he loses the presidency he will be held accountable,” he added.
As we reported, an election “integrity” group linked to Soros recently war-gamed different presidential election scenarios, telegraphing via The New York Times that Democrats have no intention of accepting a Trump win and will contest the election results, even ordering states like Washington and Oregon to secede from the United States in support of Joe Biden.
Twitter: Follow @WhiteIsTheFury
Parler: https://parler.com/profile/WhiteIsTheFury/posts
Gab: https://gab.com/WhiteIsTheFury
Minds: https://www.minds.com/whiteisthefury
A “bipartisan” election integrity group linked to George Soros, Bill Gates, and the Chinese Communist Party war-gamed several 2020 election scenarios to formulate how to overthrow Donald Trump if he’s reelected.


newswars--2020-08-13--Calais Mayor Accuses UK of “Declaration of War” Over Attempts to Stop Illegal Boat Migrants

The Mayor of Calais has accused the UK of a engaging in a “ declaration of maritime war ” by requesting military assistance to prevent illegal boat migrants making journeys to Britain .
4,000 migrants having arrived on England ’ s south coast in 2020 alone , eager to follow in the footsteps of others who are given free hotel accommodation at taxpayer expense as they wait for their asylum claims to be processed in anticipation of taking advantage of the UK ’ s generous welfare system .
After Nigel Farage ’ s focus on the crisis turned it into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government was finally forced to respond and announce it would use Royal Navy ships to patrol the English channel in a bid to deter migrant crossings .
Leftists reacted by asserting the plan was illegal , while Calais Mayor Natacha Bouchart went further , defining it as an act of war .
“ It is a declaration of maritime war , ” she said , adding , “ We in Calais no longer want to be permanent hostages enduring the lectures of British leaders.
” Tobias Ellwood , the chairman of the UK @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bouchart of using “ irresponsible language ” and called for “ increasing Anglo-French collaboration to solve the problem.
” As we highlighted yesterday , corporations like Ben & Jerry ’ s have also waded into the debate , with the ice cream manufacturer claiming that the migrants should be allowed into the UK because they are fleeing war and torture .
Last time I checked , France wasn ’ t at war and they don ’ t torture refugees .
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that you support me .
Please sign up for the free newsletter here .
Donate to me on SubscribeStar here .
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown .

The Mayor of Calais has accused the UK of a engaging in a “declaration of maritime war” by requesting military assistance to prevent illegal boat migrants making journeys to Britain.
4,000 migrants having arrived on England’s south coast in 2020 alone, eager to follow in the footsteps of others who are given free hotel accommodation at taxpayer expense as they wait for their asylum claims to be processed in anticipation of taking advantage of the UK’s generous welfare system.
After Nigel Farage’s focus on the crisis turned it into a national media story, the UK government was finally forced to respond and announce it would use Royal Navy ships to patrol the English channel in a bid to deter migrant crossings.
Leftists reacted by asserting the plan was illegal, while Calais Mayor Natacha Bouchart went further, defining it as an act of war.
I’ve been in Dover today. Until we ensure those who cross the Channel will not be able to stay, the numbers will keep on coming. pic.twitter.com/qQIrOedqXl — Nigel Farage (@Nigel_Farage) August 12, 2020
“It is a declaration of maritime war,” she said, adding, “We in Calais no longer want to be permanent hostages enduring the lectures of British leaders.”
Tobias Ellwood, the chairman of the UK’s Defence Select Committee, accused Bouchart of using “irresponsible language” and called for “increasing Anglo-French collaboration to solve the problem.”
As we highlighted yesterday, corporations like Ben & Jerry’s have also waded into the debate, with the ice cream manufacturer claiming that the migrants should be allowed into the UK because they are fleeing war and torture.
Last time I checked, France wasn’t at war and they don’t torture refugees.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me.
Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-08-13--Report: Wisconsin Democrats Are Forcing People To Wear Masks AT HOME

The Democratic Wisconsin state government is forcing employees to wear masks at home , even if they ’ re alone , according to a Kansas City Star report .
“ Some Wisconsin state officials aren ’ t fooling around when it comes to the spread of COVID-19 , ” the report notes , adding that “ in an email to employees sent out on July 31 , the head of Wisconsin ’ s Department of Natural Resources not only reminded employees of Gov .
Tony Evers ’ mask order going into effect on Aug. 1 , he also said that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even while on a teleconference.
” “ Also , wear your mask , even if you are home , to participate in a virtual meeting that involves being seen — such as on Zoom or another video-conferencing platform — by non-DNR staff , ” the email also decreed .
“ Set the safety example which shows you as a DNR public service employee care about the safety and health of others , ” the Democratic email ordered .
DNR spokeswoman Megan Sheridan admitted that the order is all about indoctrinating the general public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ By wearing a mask while video conferencing with the general public , we visually remind folks that masking is an important part of navigating the business of natural resources during this tumultuous time , ” Sheridan said .
Sheridan added that Democrats don ’ t want any screenshots of department officials or staff without masks to be “ misinterpreted to suggest that state employees are not properly following the Governor ’ s directive.
” Major League Baseball ( MLB ) surveillance contract proves there will be no end to mask mandates The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which became effective August 1st , declared a “ Public Health Emergency and issued an Emergency Order requiring individuals to wear face coverings when indoors and not in a private residence , with some exceptions as clarified and defined in the order.
” Republicans in the state have said they are “ standing ready ” to strike down the order , but have not indicated when .
Meanwhile , some Wisconsin sheriffs have admitted they will not enforce Evers ’ mandate .
A statement from the Adams County Sheriff ’ s Office @ @ @ @ @ @ @ resources to investigate this type of complaint .
There are numerous legitimate exemptions to the requirement of wearing a face covering.
” Brown County also announced that it “ will not be responding to complaints of individuals violating the Governor ’ s mandate , nor will it be taking any direct law enforcement action as it relates to the Governor ’ s face covering mandate .
”

The Democratic Wisconsin state government is forcing employees to wear masks at home, even if they’re alone, according to a Kansas City Star report.
“Some Wisconsin state officials aren’t fooling around when it comes to the spread of COVID-19,” the report notes, adding that “in an email to employees sent out on July 31, the head of Wisconsin’s Department of Natural Resources not only reminded employees of Gov. Tony Evers’ mask order going into effect on Aug. 1, he also said that every DNR employee must wear a mask even while on a teleconference.”
“Also, wear your mask, even if you are home, to participate in a virtual meeting that involves being seen — such as on Zoom or another video-conferencing platform — by non-DNR staff,” the email also decreed.
“Set the safety example which shows you as a DNR public service employee care about the safety and health of others,” the Democratic email ordered.
DNR spokeswoman Megan Sheridan admitted that the order is all about indoctrinating the general public into accepting the wearing of masks.
“By wearing a mask while video conferencing with the general public, we visually remind folks that masking is an important part of navigating the business of natural resources during this tumultuous time,” Sheridan said.
Sheridan added that Democrats don’t want any screenshots of department officials or staff without masks to be “misinterpreted to suggest that state employees are not properly following the Governor’s directive.”
Major League Baseball (MLB) surveillance contract proves there will be no end to mask mandates
The directive issued by Democratic Governor Tony Evers, which became effective August 1st, declared a “Public Health Emergency and issued an Emergency Order requiring individuals to wear face coverings when indoors and not in a private residence, with some exceptions as clarified and defined in the order.”
Republicans in the state have said they are “standing ready” to strike down the order, but have not indicated when.
Meanwhile, some Wisconsin sheriffs have admitted they will not enforce Evers’ mandate.
A statement from the Adams County Sheriff’s Office declared that they “do not have resources to investigate this type of complaint. There are numerous legitimate exemptions to the requirement of wearing a face covering.”
Brown County also announced that it “will not be responding to complaints of individuals violating the Governor’s mandate, nor will it be taking any direct law enforcement action as it relates to the Governor’s face covering mandate.”


newswars--2020-08-13--Flashback: Kamala Harris Laughs About Murdering Trump

While many unsavoury claims about Kamala Harris are being dredged up in the wake of Biden tapping her for his running mate , one that can not be denied is a video from two years ago when Harris “ joked ” and manically laughed on national TV about killing President Trump and VP Mike Pence .
The video comes from an appearance on the Ellen DeGeneres show in 2018 , before Harris had announced her own doomed Presidential campaign .
the host asked “ If you had to be stuck in an elevator with either President Trump , Mike Pence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it be ?
” Harris replied “ Does one of us have to come out alive ?
” and then couldn ’ t stop laughing .
It was all fun and games , but what if a Republican Senator had made the same joke about murdering Obama ?
Or if a white male Republican had said the same thing about Harris ?
Other past videos are being recycled online following Harris ’ rise to more prominence .
Perhaps one of the worst is from November 2018 , during a hearing with former ICE @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s past comments comparing the Democratic party to the Klan to turn it around on ICE : Ironically , some “ progressives ” , particularly Bernie bro ’ s , are complaining that Harris isn ’ t enough of a leftist , but is just annoying enough to conservatives : Others are just concerned that Harris is a totally uninspiring pick : As Democrats are now even admitting , Harris wasn ’ t even Biden ’ s first choice .
Senior Obama campaign advisor David Axelrod wrote that “ Others Biden considered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with him.
” “ He reportedly clicked well with Gov .
Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan , but she would not have fulfilled the desire of those who prioritized a candidate of color.
” Axlerod added .
While Harris wasn ’ t Biden ’ s first choice , she was Trump ’ s first pick , however .

While many unsavoury claims about Kamala Harris are being dredged up in the wake of Biden tapping her for his running mate, one that cannot be denied is a video from two years ago when Harris “joked” and manically laughed on national TV about killing President Trump and VP Mike Pence.
The video comes from an appearance on the Ellen DeGeneres show in 2018, before Harris had announced her own doomed Presidential campaign.
the host asked “If you had to be stuck in an elevator with either President Trump, Mike Pence, or Jeff Sessions, who would it be?”
Harris replied “Does one of us have to come out alive?” and then couldn’t stop laughing.
It was all fun and games, but what if a Republican Senator had made the same joke about murdering Obama?
@KamalaHarris @SenKamalaHarris was on @TheEllenShow and cracked what was clearly a very funny joke to her and the host. Can you imagine an R senator having said something similar about then Pres @BarackObama ? https://t.co/uT3qRyzY1E — Joe Pags Pagliarulo (@JoeTalkShow) April 5, 2018
Or killing Hillary?
Why are they laughing so hard? What was so hysterically funny there? Imagine if that joke was made about Hillary — Joe Warmington (@joe_warmington) April 6, 2018
Or if a white male Republican had said the same thing about Harris?
WATCH Kamala Harris joke about killing Trump, Pence and Sessions on Ellen… and everyone laughs. Could you imagine what the reaction would be if any of those men said the same thing about her?!?! pic.twitter.com/eaZ23MveLD — Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) April 6, 2018
This is the Democratic VP pick. Now, try to imagine the consequences if a conservative would’ve say this about the other side pic.twitter.com/IMfNKeiWKz — Joel Fischer (@JFNYC1) August 12, 2020
Other past videos are being recycled online following Harris’ rise to more prominence. Perhaps one of the worst is from November 2018, during a hearing with former ICE chief Ronald Vitiello.
Harris twisted Vitiello’s past comments comparing the Democratic party to the Klan to turn it around on ICE:
Ironically, some “progressives”, particularly Bernie bro’s, are complaining that Harris isn’t enough of a leftist, but is just annoying enough to conservatives:
We are in the midst of the largest protest movement in American history, the subject of which is excessive policing, and the Democratic Party chose a “top cop” and the author of the Joe Biden crime bill to save us from Trump. The contempt for the base is, wow. — Briahna Joy Gray (@briebriejoy) August 11, 2020
Well, there you have it. @JoeBiden gives the middle finger to progressives, #BlackLivesMatter protesters, and black voters under the age of 50 https://t.co/cVNwR2hb31 — Jordan (@JordanChariton) August 11, 2020
Crime bill author Joe Biden selects “top cop” Kamala Harris for VP as racial justice and police abolition protests continue across the country. — Walker Bragman (@WalkerBragman) August 11, 2020
Apparently the answer to a movement for black lives is someone who helped perpetuate a lock em up regime while letting the powerful in Silicon Valley and Wall Streeters like Steve Mnuchin loot with impunity. Happy 2020. #BidenVP https://t.co/EQNKglP0gM — Krystal Ball (@krystalball) August 11, 2020
Biden going with the strategically brilliant move of picking somebody for VP who is despised by both the right and the left. — Secular Talk (@KyleKulinski) August 11, 2020
Others are just concerned that Harris is a totally uninspiring pick:
Kamala’s presidential campaign was a total humiliating disaster. One of the worst of all time, considering the amount of unearned hype she received. Did everybody miss that, or what? — Michael Tracey (@mtracey) August 11, 2020
As Democrats are now even admitting, Harris wasn’t even Biden’s first choice. Senior Obama campaign advisor David Axelrod wrote that “Others Biden considered may have fit more comfortably into partnership with him.”
Why Kamala Harris won the VP contest Opinion by David Axelrod, CNN Senior Political Commentatorhttps://t.co/ACB9AOyIFj — Rocky2 (@Rokbehappy1234) August 12, 2020
“He reportedly clicked well with Gov. Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan, but she would not have fulfilled the desire of those who prioritized a candidate of color.” Axlerod added.
While Harris wasn’t Biden’s first choice, she was Trump’s first pick, however.


newswars--2020-08-13--Report: U.S. Nuclear Research Lab Hosted Reeducation Camp For ‘White Males’

The white men tasked with developing parts for nuclear weapons at one of our nation ’ s top nuclear weapons @ @ @ @ @ 3-day reeducation camp to be harangued about their “ white privilege ” and told to @ @ @ @ @ for existing .
Christopher F. Rufo reported on the disturbing brainwashing effort in a long @ @ @ @ @ which I ’ ve embedded via ThreadReader for easier reading below : Is this discrimination @ @ @ @ @ joins Owen on the War Room to provide updates on his fight for Hong Kong @ @ @ @

The white men tasked with developing parts for nuclear weapons at one of our nation’s top nuclear weapons labs were sent to a 3-day reeducation camp to be harangued about their “white privilege” and told to write letters apologizing to PoCs for existing.
Christopher F. Rufo reported on the disturbing brainwashing effort in a long thread Tuesday on Twitter, which I’ve embedded via ThreadReader for easier reading below:
Is this discrimination even legal?
Matan Evans joins Owen on the War Room to provide updates on his fight for Hong Kong’s freedom.


newswars--2020-08-13--VIDEO: Doctor Vapes Through Face Masks, Shows Thick Clouds Escape Through Sides, Bottom, and Top

A doctor has uploaded a video purportedly showing the inefficency of facemasks , by blowing clouds of vape smoke through the sides of a mask .
Dr Ted Noel , an anesthesiologist with 36 years of experience , recently uploaded a video contrasting the mainstream media narrative that face masks are the ultimate solution to protecting oneself from spreading or catching the coronavirus .
Doctor Noel demonstrated the ability for aerosol particles to get through a number of face masks by using a vape .
These included medical face masks , cloth masks , and guard masks which have a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on USA Today editorial and the New England Journal of Medicine lay out plans and tactics to punish people who refuse to get vaccinated The vape aerosol , which has the same size or larger particles as coronavirus , easily went around the sides , bottom , and tops of the masks that Noel displayed .
“ It might protect me from you , but it sure isn ’ t going to protect you from me , ” Noel argued : The fact is that unless I have a mask which is fully @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the filter matieral both directions , and I have really high quality filter , nothing is going to protect in either direction , because just the same way that the vape went out , around , and through , it will come in , around , and through .
Aerosols will not be stopped by masks .
1776 around the world starts when you visit the Infowars Store !
It follows commentary from Noel posted last month to TownHall , where he pointed out that in all of the CDC literature regarding masks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ author brushes aside all the negative data with “ masks may help.
’ ” Noel declared this as simply “ wishful thinking ” : The data that they will help doesn ’ t exist .
In the scientific literature , this would be called a “ Class D ” recommendation .
It is “ expert opinion , ” supposedly based on first principles .
When there is no literature support , professional society guidelines will normally state that “ expert opinion suggests… but we can make no recommendations.
” Properly understood , this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” But the basketball player and scarf queen seem very adamant that we should wear masks .
One must ask why they are so sure .
Since nothing either one has recommended has been correct , it seems that they have decided that virtue signaling will keep their fifteen minutes of fame going .
They have chosen a “ Scientific Wild-Assed Guess ” as their foundation .

A doctor has uploaded a video purportedly showing the inefficency of facemasks, by blowing clouds of vape smoke through the sides of a mask.
Dr Ted Noel, an anesthesiologist with 36 years of experience, recently uploaded a video contrasting the mainstream media narrative that face masks are the ultimate solution to protecting oneself from spreading or catching the coronavirus.
Doctor Noel demonstrated the ability for aerosol particles to get through a number of face masks by using a vape. These included medical face masks, cloth masks, and guard masks which have a “high efficiency filter material.”


newswars--2020-08-13--Ghislaine Maxwell Taken Off Suicide Watch, Claims Mistreatment Including ‘Numerous Body Scans’

Lawyers for Ghislaine Maxwell say she ’ s being “ treated worse ” than similar detainees because prison officials have resorted to extreme measures to keep her alive until trial in just over 330 days .
“ Until recently , Ms. Maxwell was subjected to suicide watch protocols , including being woken up every few hours during the night and being forced to wear special clothing , despite the fact that she , unlike Mr. Epstein , has never been suicidal and was never diagnosed as exhibiting risk factors for suicide , ” wrote her attorneys , adding that “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mr. Epstein , Ms. Maxwell is treated worse than other similarly situated pretrial detainees , ” reports Forbes .
It wants one thing .
Total power and control .
What would that spider say if it was made to take truth serum ?
Find out in this exclusive report from Alex Jones .
Maxwell – who is being held in Brooklyn ’ s federal prison , is accused of abetting deceased financier Jeffrey Epstein ’ s alleged underage sex-trafficking ring , charges she denies .
Epstein – who was being held at Manhattan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) was found dead in his cell on August 10 , 2019 amid a suspicious series of events which included sleeping guards , broken cameras , and the removal of his cellmate .
According to Maxwell ’ s attorneys , the British socialite ’ s cell is searched several times per day , and “ she has been forced to undergo numerous body scans.
” The conditions , they argue , prevent Maxwell from preparing for trial and threaten her Sixth Amendment rights guaranteeing participation in her own defense .
Meanwhile , Ghislaine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to “ Fox Nation ” host Nancy Grace .
“ What does she really have ?
” Grace asked during an appearance on the “ Fox News Rundown ” podcast on Wednesday .
“ ” Yes , I know she ’ s got a lot , but let ’ s think this through .
If she ’ s claiming to have videos and photos of wealthy , powerful or influential people having sexual relations with minors , it ’ s my understanding that when Epstein ’ s Manhattan townhome was raided , they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ safe or somewhere on the premises .
If they ’ ve already got that , what could she really give them ?
“

Lawyers for Ghislaine Maxwell say she’s being “treated worse” than similar detainees because prison officials have resorted to extreme measures to keep her alive until trial in just over 330 days.
“Until recently, Ms. Maxwell was subjected to suicide watch protocols, including being woken up every few hours during the night and being forced to wear special clothing, despite the fact that she, unlike Mr. Epstein, has never been suicidal and was never diagnosed as exhibiting risk factors for suicide,” wrote her attorneys, adding that “as a result of what occurred with Mr. Epstein, Ms. Maxwell is treated worse than other similarly situated pretrial detainees,” reports Forbes.
It wants one thing. Total power and control. What would that spider say if it was made to take truth serum? Find out in this exclusive report from Alex Jones.
Maxwell – who is being held in Brooklyn’s federal prison, is accused of abetting deceased financier Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged underage sex-trafficking ring, charges she denies. Epstein – who was being held at Manhattan’s Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) was found dead in his cell on August 10, 2019 amid a suspicious series of events which included sleeping guards, broken cameras, and the removal of his cellmate.
According to Maxwell’s attorneys, the British socialite’s cell is searched several times per day, and “she has been forced to undergo numerous body scans.”
The conditions, they argue, prevent Maxwell from preparing for trial and threaten her Sixth Amendment rights guaranteeing participation in her own defense.
Meanwhile, Ghislaine may have trouble cutting a deal according to “Fox Nation” host Nancy Grace.
“What does she really have?” Grace asked during an appearance on the “Fox News Rundown” podcast on Wednesday.


newswars--2020-08-13--San Francisco Sen. Scott Wiener Introduces Bill to Decriminalize Men Having Sex With Boys

San Francisco state Senator Scott Wiener has introduced a new bill to decriminalize adult men having sex with boys and he and his allies in the media are smearing all opposition as “ homophobic ” and “ anti-Semitic.
” From The Federalist , “ No California Shouldn ’ t Decriminalize Adult Sex With 14-Year-Olds ” : LGBT activists have pushed reasonable notions of equality to its limits with obscene perversions .
State Sen. Scott Wiener , D-San Francisco — the same lawmaker who co-sponsored a bill in 2017 to remove the felony penalty for knowingly exposing another person to HIV @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bill 145 to give judges more flexibility in sentencing gay men who abuse minors .
Under current law — which Wiener , who is gay , describes as “ horrific homophobia ” — a straight 24-year-old male who has sex with a 15-year-old girl can avoid being put on the sex-offender list if the judge feels the situation does not deserve it , but a gay man in the same scenario with a similar-aged boy would not be given the same option .
The sickness we should worry about in schools is evident @ @ @ @ @ @ @ English teacher concerned that parents will see what he ’ s teaching their children Wiener ’ s argument is one of evolving social standards .
In 2015 , the California Supreme Court upheld the long-standing separation of vaginal sex from other forms of sex-based on the misguided idea that if pregnancy occurred , placing the father on the sex-offender list could ruin his chances of providing for his family .
The extreme of the scenario would be an 18-year-old man with a 17-year-old girlfriend .
Wiener ’ s bill , however , is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ forms of sex should be treated equally under the law .
The Law Will Protect Exploitation of Minors Moreover , while there is room for flexibility in a ruling in which a boy turns 18 while his girlfriend is still 17 and her father presses charges , the bill defines the age minimum at 14 .
Recognizing that minors can not legally consent to sex , Wiener argues that if a minor age 14 to 17 voluntarily has sex with an adult who is less than 10 years older , the judge should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the case whether the adult should be placed on the sex-offender registry .
Data provided by Wiener ’ s office states , “ [ A ] t least 2,400 people on the [ CA ] sex-offender registry , and potentially hundreds more , have been convicted of non-vaginal sex with a minor age 14 or older.
” According to the media , you ’ re “ homophobic ” and “ anti-Semitic ” if you oppose this bill .
Wiener himself similarly painted all opponents of the bill as homophobes and anti-Semites , writing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ antisemitism are over are not paying attention.
” The left loves to talk about “ extremism ” on the right and yet NAMBLA is effectively now part of the mainstream for the Democratic Party in California .
As I reported last week , San Francisco has approved an ordinance to reopen gay bathhouses in the name of aiding the city ’ s “ economic and cultural recovery ” while most small businesses are shut down and STDs are at record levels .
This is what the left calls “ progress .
”

San Francisco state Senator Scott Wiener has introduced a new bill to decriminalize adult men having sex with boys and he and his allies in the media are smearing all opposition as “homophobic” and “anti-Semitic.”
From The Federalist, “No California Shouldn’t Decriminalize Adult Sex With 14-Year-Olds”:
LGBT activists have pushed reasonable notions of equality to its limits with obscene perversions. State Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco — the same lawmaker who co-sponsored a bill in 2017 to remove the felony penalty for knowingly exposing another person to HIV — has introduced a bill, Senate Bill 145 to give judges more flexibility in sentencing gay men who abuse minors.
Under current law — which Wiener, who is gay, describes as “horrific homophobia” — a straight 24-year-old male who has sex with a 15-year-old girl can avoid being put on the sex-offender list if the judge feels the situation does not deserve it, but a gay man in the same scenario with a similar-aged boy would not be given the same option.
The sickness we should worry about in schools is evident in the social media posting of an English teacher concerned that parents will see what he’s teaching their children
Wiener’s argument is one of evolving social standards. In 2015, the California Supreme Court upheld the long-standing separation of vaginal sex from other forms of sex-based on the misguided idea that if pregnancy occurred, placing the father on the sex-offender list could ruin his chances of providing for his family. The extreme of the scenario would be an 18-year-old man with a 17-year-old girlfriend.
Wiener’s bill, however, is not so straightforward. He argues all forms of sex should be treated equally under the law.
The Law Will Protect Exploitation of Minors
Moreover, while there is room for flexibility in a ruling in which a boy turns 18 while his girlfriend is still 17 and her father presses charges, the bill defines the age minimum at 14. Recognizing that minors cannot legally consent to sex, Wiener argues that if a minor age 14 to 17 voluntarily has sex with an adult who is less than 10 years older, the judge should decide based on the individual facts of the case whether the adult should be placed on the sex-offender registry. Data provided by Wiener’s office states, “[A]t least 2,400 people on the [CA] sex-offender registry, and potentially hundreds more, have been convicted of non-vaginal sex with a minor age 14 or older.”


newswars--2020-08-13--Planned Parenthood Gets More Than 600 Million Dollars A Year From The Federal Government

The amount of funding that Planned Parenthood receives from the federal government continues to explode .
When Barack Obama ’ s second term ended , Planned Parenthood was getting about 500 million dollars from the federal government each year , but now that number has risen to more than 600 million dollars each year .
As a candidate for president in 2016 , Donald Trump said that he would defund Planned Parenthood , but that has not happened .
In fact , it is not even an issue that is being debated on the national stage in 2020 .
Producer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the KKK to Infowars Rob .
So Planned Parenthood will continue to be showered with money from the federal government no matter who wins the election in November , and hardly anyone in America is still talking about how deeply wrong this is .
Planned Parenthood gets more money from the federal government than anyone else by far .
If that funding ever stopped , more than a third of Planned Parenthood ’ s budget would be wiped out and the organization would instantly be in massive financial trouble .
By handing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ year , the federal government is implicitly endorsing what they are doing , and that is a national disgrace which will never be erased .
Of course some people are pointing to the fact that Planned Parenthood is no longer receiving Title X funding as a major victory .
Last year , new regulations instituted by the Trump administration caused Planned Parenthood to decide to opt out of the Title X program… Title X is a federal program that focuses on providing family planning and related preventive services to low-income Americans at little @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Planned Parenthood announced that rather than comply with the Trump administration ’ s new regulations relating to Title X ’ s federal family planning program , the abortion giant would stop participating in the program altogether unless the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals stepped in to block the regulations .
The court did no such thing , and now Planned Parenthood will no longer participate in the program .
By opting out of Title X , Planned Parenthood lost about 60 million dollars a year .
And that is certainly a good thing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been more than made up for by a massive increase in other federal funding .
The following comes from a piece authored by Warren Cole Smith… In Planned Parenthood ’ s FY 2018 , the first year that would reflect a Trump Administration budget , Planned Parenthood received about $ 563.8-million in taxpayer funding .
That level was a record for any administration in history , significantly more funding than Planned Parenthood got during any year of the Obama Administration .
In fact , during the last year of the Obama Administration , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 10-million , to the lowest level since 2014 .
But in 2019 , the Trump Administration broke its own record by a wide margin .
Government reimbursements and grants to Planned Parenthood went up by more than $ 50-million , to $ 616.8-million .
That funding level represents the single largest one-year jump in funding for Planned Parenthood in history .
So what this means is that Planned Parenthood is getting much more money from the federal government under the Trump administration than it ever did under the Obama administration .
Just think @ @ @ @ @ @ @ used to tell people that it was such a horrible thing that Planned Parenthood was getting about 500 million dollars a year under the Obama administration , but until I did some research I did not even realize that Planned Parenthood is now getting more than 600 million dollars a year from the federal government under the Trump administration .
So yes , we should be thankful that Planned Parenthood has opted out of Title X funding , but with overall federal funding still rising we are in even worse shape then we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Students for Life President Kristan Hawkins summarized where things currently stand… For decades , Republican members of Congress have gotten our votes by pledging to be “ pro-life ” , but every year most of those Republicans vote for budget bills that give Planned Parenthood hundreds of millions of dollars .
Every time they vote for such budget bills , they are literally cursing America .
I have said it before and I will say it again .
You are not “ pro-life ” if you support budgets that fund Planned Parenthood .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Since Roe v. Wade was decided in 1973 , more than 60 million children have been killed in America ’ s abortion clinics .
Globally , more than 1.5 billion children have been slaughtered over the past 50 years .
That is a crime against humanity that is unmatched in all of human history .
This should be a central issue this election season , because if we stay on the path that we are currently on the United States of America is no longer going to exist .
The only hope @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stop killing babies on an industrial scale .
Does anyone out there actually believe that we are going to get away with it ?
If so , I would love to hear your reasoning .
More than 60 million children have already died , more are dying every single day , and the vast majority of Americans treat this issue like it is no big deal .
And our “ pro-life ” politicians keep forking over giant mountains of money to the people primarily responsible for doing the killing year after year .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ is going to end well , and I think that most of you already realize that .

The amount of funding that Planned Parenthood receives from the federal government continues to explode.
When Barack Obama’s second term ended, Planned Parenthood was getting about 500 million dollars from the federal government each year, but now that number has risen to more than 600 million dollars each year.
As a candidate for president in 2016, Donald Trump said that he would defund Planned Parenthood, but that has not happened.
In fact, it is not even an issue that is being debated on the national stage in 2020.
Producer Scott Explains The Racist Democrat Parties History with the KKK to Infowars Rob.
So Planned Parenthood will continue to be showered with money from the federal government no matter who wins the election in November, and hardly anyone in America is still talking about how deeply wrong this is.
Planned Parenthood gets more money from the federal government than anyone else by far. If that funding ever stopped, more than a third of Planned Parenthood’s budget would be wiped out and the organization would instantly be in massive financial trouble.
By handing them hundreds of millions of dollars a year, the federal government is implicitly endorsing what they are doing, and that is a national disgrace which will never be erased.
Of course some people are pointing to the fact that Planned Parenthood is no longer receiving Title X funding as a major victory. Last year, new regulations instituted by the Trump administration caused Planned Parenthood to decide to opt out of the Title X program…
Title X is a federal program that focuses on providing family planning and related preventive services to low-income Americans at little or no cost. Last week, Planned Parenthood announced that rather than comply with the Trump administration’s new regulations relating to Title X’s federal family planning program, the abortion giant would stop participating in the program altogether unless the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals stepped in to block the regulations. The court did no such thing, and now Planned Parenthood will no longer participate in the program.
By opting out of Title X, Planned Parenthood lost about 60 million dollars a year.
And that is certainly a good thing.
But that reduction in funding has been more than made up for by a massive increase in other federal funding. The following comes from a piece authored by Warren Cole Smith…
In Planned Parenthood’s FY 2018, the first year that would reflect a Trump Administration budget, Planned Parenthood received about $563.8-million in taxpayer funding. That level was a record for any administration in history, significantly more funding than Planned Parenthood got during any year of the Obama Administration. In fact, during the last year of the Obama Administration, funding had actually dropped by about $10-million, to the lowest level since 2014. But in 2019, the Trump Administration broke its own record by a wide margin. Government reimbursements and grants to Planned Parenthood went up by more than $50-million, to $616.8-million. That funding level represents the single largest one-year jump in funding for Planned Parenthood in history.
So what this means is that Planned Parenthood is getting much more money from the federal government under the Trump administration than it ever did under the Obama administration.
Just think about that for a moment.
I used to tell people that it was such a horrible thing that Planned Parenthood was getting about 500 million dollars a year under the Obama administration, but until I did some research I did not even realize that Planned Parenthood is now getting more than 600 million dollars a year from the federal government under the Trump administration.
So yes, we should be thankful that Planned Parenthood has opted out of Title X funding, but with overall federal funding still rising we are in even worse shape then we were before. I really like how Students for Life President Kristan Hawkins summarized where things currently stand…
“The Trump Administration needs to uphold their promise to pro-life Americans and re-direct all current taxpayer funding of Planned Parenthood, to community health care centers that practice only non-violent healthcare. While we are grateful the Trump administration cut off the abortion Goliath’s illegal access to Title X funding, $600 million is left to go. The nation’s number one abortion vendor broke all previous records in taking money from taxpayers this year. Our Healthcare dollars should be invested with those who extend life and end suffering, not kill for a living,” she observed.
For decades, Republican members of Congress have gotten our votes by pledging to be “pro-life”, but every year most of those Republicans vote for budget bills that give Planned Parenthood hundreds of millions of dollars.
Every time they vote for such budget bills, they are literally cursing America.
I have said it before and I will say it again. You are not “pro-life” if you support budgets that fund Planned Parenthood.
This is not just another political issue. Since Roe v. Wade was decided in 1973, more than 60 million children have been killed in America’s abortion clinics.
Globally, more than 1.5 billion children have been slaughtered over the past 50 years. That is a crime against humanity that is unmatched in all of human history.
This should be a central issue this election season, because if we stay on the path that we are currently on the United States of America is no longer going to exist.
The only hope we have for national survival is to stop killing babies on an industrial scale.
Does anyone out there actually believe that we are going to get away with it? If so, I would love to hear your reasoning.
More than 60 million children have already died, more are dying every single day, and the vast majority of Americans treat this issue like it is no big deal.
And our “pro-life” politicians keep forking over giant mountains of money to the people primarily responsible for doing the killing year after year.
There is no possible way that this is going to end well, and I think that most of you already realize that.


newswars--2020-08-13--Unconvinced by virtue signaling: Poll shows 8 in 10 Americans think corporate anti-racism statements

Unconvinced by virtue signaling: Poll shows 8 in 10 Americans think corporate anti-racism statements in BLM era are disingenuous

Efforts by corporations to kowtow to the woke crowd may avail little because few Americans see sincerity in the anti-racism messages pouring out of PR departments amid Black Lives Matter protests , a poll has revealed .
Only 19 percent of Americans believe genuine concern over the treatment of black people in the US was a major contributing factor behind companies speaking out about race , according to a Pew Research Center poll released on Wednesday .
Just 14 percent of Republicans and 22 percent of Democrats considered the motivations to be genuine .
There were significant variations by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 30 percent of blacks thought companies were acting on genuine concern , versus 14 percent of whites – but all groups largely found the statements to be motivated by outside pressure .
Some 69 percent of those polled cited outside pressure as the key motivating factor , including 75 percent of Republicans and 65 percent of Democrats .
BLM is at it again as they continue to prove they are a domestic terror group .
Pressure on Corporate America to support BLM mushroomed as protesters took to the streets following the May 25 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in police custody .
Companies such as CVS , Chick-fill-A , and Goya were put on an “ anti-black list ” for exhibiting “ anti-black behavior.
” In the case of drugstore chain CVS , that behavior was donating money to political organizations that support President Donald Trump .
Companies such as Airbnb , Grubhub , Microsoft and Cisco were praised for being supportive of the BLM cause .
Much of that support took the form of cash donations to BLM and related groups .
Others made multi-faceted pledges .
Microsoft , for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ billion altogether , including internal diversity and inclusion programs , grants to black-owned business partners , and donations to groups that serve black communities .
The company also pledged to double its number of black employees in senior positions by 2025 .
While more than eight in 10 Americans doubt the sincerity of anti-racism statements , 52 percent said it ’ s important that companies make public comments about political or social issues , the Pew poll showed .
A total of 75 percent of black respondents said such statements are important , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
There also was a political divide on the question , as 71 percent of Democrats said making statements on political or social issues is important , versus 31 percent of Republicans .

Efforts by corporations to kowtow to the woke crowd may avail little because few Americans see sincerity in the anti-racism messages pouring out of PR departments amid Black Lives Matter protests, a poll has revealed.
Only 19 percent of Americans believe genuine concern over the treatment of black people in the US was a major contributing factor behind companies speaking out about race, according to a Pew Research Center poll released on Wednesday. Just 14 percent of Republicans and 22 percent of Democrats considered the motivations to be genuine.
There were significant variations by the race of respondents – for instance, 30 percent of blacks thought companies were acting on genuine concern, versus 14 percent of whites – but all groups largely found the statements to be motivated by outside pressure. Some 69 percent of those polled cited outside pressure as the key motivating factor, including 75 percent of Republicans and 65 percent of Democrats.
BLM is at it again as they continue to prove they are a domestic terror group.
Pressure on Corporate America to support BLM mushroomed as protesters took to the streets following the May 25 death of Minneapolis black man George Floyd in police custody. Companies such as CVS, Chick-fill-A, and Goya were put on an “anti-black list” for exhibiting “anti-black behavior.” In the case of drugstore chain CVS, that behavior was donating money to political organizations that support President Donald Trump.
Companies such as Airbnb, Grubhub, Microsoft and Cisco were praised for being supportive of the BLM cause. Much of that support took the form of cash donations to BLM and related groups. Others made multi-faceted pledges. Microsoft, for instance, committed more than $1 billion altogether, including internal diversity and inclusion programs, grants to black-owned business partners, and donations to groups that serve black communities. The company also pledged to double its number of black employees in senior positions by 2025.
While more than eight in 10 Americans doubt the sincerity of anti-racism statements, 52 percent said it’s important that companies make public comments about political or social issues, the Pew poll showed. A total of 75 percent of black respondents said such statements are important, but just 42 percent of whites agreed. There also was a political divide on the question, as 71 percent of Democrats said making statements on political or social issues is important, versus 31 percent of Republicans.


newswars--2020-08-13--Bill Gates Slams Hydroxychloroquine, “Anti-Vaxxers,” 5G “Conspiracies” in New Interview

Billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates joined Bloomberg News for a softball interview to promote his COVID-19 vaccine , slam anti-vaxxers and dispel 5G “ conspiracy theories.
” In the interview published Thursday , Gates confirms globalists plan to continue holding the world hostage until his vaccine arrives in late 2021 .
“ How do you think this all ends ?
” Bloomberg asks .
Gates , who ’ s pledged over $ 350 million through his foundation to fund vaccine research , responds , “ The innovations in therapeutics will start to cut the death rate , but the true end @ @ @ @ @ @ @ infections and the vaccine giving us herd immunity .
For rich countries , that will be sometime next year , ideally in the first half .
We ’ ll get out of this by the end of 2021.
” Bashing the anti-malarial drug promoted by President Trump , hydroxychloroquine , which has proven effective in some studies against COVID-19 , Gates falsely claims the drug comes with “ severe side effects.
” “ This is an age of science , but sometimes it doesn ’ t feel that way , ” Gates says @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine could be effective .
“ In the test tube , hydroxychloroquine looked good .
On the other hand , there are lots of good therapeutic drugs coming that are proven to work without the severe side effects.
” Gates also foreshadows a future scenario where mandatory vaccines could be slowly rolled out amid vaccine hesitancy if they ’ re required first for health care workers .
“ Making something mandatory can often backfire , ” Gates told Bloomberg .
“ But you might say that if you ’ re going to work @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exposure to elderly people , it would be required.
” Disparaging the issue of pesky “ anti-vaxxers ” skeptical of injecting foreign matter into their bodies , Gates condescendingly recalls two White House visits where he was forced to listen to informed consent proponent Robert F. Kennedy .
“ The two times I ’ ve been to the White House [ since 2016 ] , I was told I had to go listen to anti-vaxxers like Robert Kennedy Jr .
So , yes , it ’ s ironic that people are questioning vaccines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ say , ‘ Oh , my God , how else can you get out of a tragic pandemic ?
’ ” Gates also reveals he not only has plans for an “ initial vaccine , ” which he admits will have questionable “ effectiveness against sickness and transmission , ” but a host of them which he says companies will compete to produce .
“ With so many companies working on it , we can afford quite a few failures and still have something with low cost and long duration , ” Gates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 5G ’ s relevance to the coronavirus , Bloomberg intentionally distorts concerns by claiming people are worried Gates is “ pursuing vaccine research to control people ’ s minds.
” Ever the noble humanist , Gates feigns innocence arguing he ’ s “ giving money to save lives , ” and definitely not “ making money to get rid of lives.
” Exposing a huge chink in the globalist agenda , Gates admits internet “ conspiracy theories ” have the potential to undermine his vaccine effort : “ If that stops people from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ latest data about wearing a mask , then it ’ s a big problem.
” Alex Jones breaks down the reasons Trump could be cowering to the medical tyranny based on a pandemic hoax .

Billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates joined Bloomberg News for a softball interview to promote his COVID-19 vaccine, slam anti-vaxxers and dispel 5G “conspiracy theories.”
In the interview published Thursday, Gates confirms globalists plan to continue holding the world hostage until his vaccine arrives in late 2021.
“How do you think this all ends?” Bloomberg asks.
Gates, who’s pledged over $350 million through his foundation to fund vaccine research, responds, “The innovations in therapeutics will start to cut the death rate, but the true end will come from the spread of natural infections and the vaccine giving us herd immunity. For rich countries, that will be sometime next year, ideally in the first half. We’ll get out of this by the end of 2021.”
Bashing the anti-malarial drug promoted by President Trump, hydroxychloroquine, which has proven effective in some studies against COVID-19, Gates falsely claims the drug comes with “severe side effects.”
“This is an age of science, but sometimes it doesn’t feel that way,” Gates says, dismissing the idea anything besides his vaccine could be effective. “In the test tube, hydroxychloroquine looked good. On the other hand, there are lots of good therapeutic drugs coming that are proven to work without the severe side effects.”
Gates also foreshadows a future scenario where mandatory vaccines could be slowly rolled out amid vaccine hesitancy if they’re required first for health care workers.
“Making something mandatory can often backfire,” Gates told Bloomberg. “But you might say that if you’re going to work in an old-folks home or have any exposure to elderly people, it would be required.”
Disparaging the issue of pesky “anti-vaxxers” skeptical of injecting foreign matter into their bodies, Gates condescendingly recalls two White House visits where he was forced to listen to informed consent proponent Robert F. Kennedy.
“The two times I’ve been to the White House [since 2016], I was told I had to go listen to anti-vaxxers like Robert Kennedy Jr. So, yes, it’s ironic that people are questioning vaccines and we’re actually having to say, ‘Oh, my God, how else can you get out of a tragic pandemic?’”
Gates also reveals he not only has plans for an “initial vaccine,” which he admits will have questionable “effectiveness against sickness and transmission,” but a host of them which he says companies will compete to produce.
“With so many companies working on it, we can afford quite a few failures and still have something with low cost and long duration,” Gates ominously states.
On the issue of 5G’s relevance to the coronavirus, Bloomberg intentionally distorts concerns by claiming people are worried Gates is “pursuing vaccine research to control people’s minds.”
Ever the noble humanist, Gates feigns innocence arguing he’s “giving money to save lives,” and definitely not “making money to get rid of lives.”
Exposing a huge chink in the globalist agenda, Gates admits internet “conspiracy theories” have the potential to undermine his vaccine effort: “If that stops people from taking a vaccine or looking at the latest data about wearing a mask, then it’s a big problem.”
Follow the author on Gab: https://gab.ai/adansalazar
On Twitter: Follow @AdanSalazarWins
On Parler: https://parler.com/profile/adansalazar/
On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/adan.salazar.735
On Minds: https://www.minds.com/adan_infowars
Alex Jones breaks down the reasons Trump could be cowering to the medical tyranny based on a pandemic hoax.


newswars--2020-08-13--Go Swimming with Alex Jones!

Go Swimming with Alex Jones!

Join Alex and the Infowars crew this Saturday at high noon .
Meet at the Hill of Life via the @ @ @ @ @

Join Alex and the Infowars crew this Saturday at high noon.
Meet at the Hill of Life via the Barton Creek Greenbelt trail. To get there, start at 1710 Camp Craft Road, Austin, TX 78746.
We will see you there! Share this page to help bring as much people as possible!
The starting spot looks like this:
Remember, the address for the Hill of Life is: 1710 Camp Craft Road, Austin, TX 78746
The mayor of Austin, Texas, has decided to close public nature trails because of COVID-19. So Action 7 visits Barton Springs to open the park back up.


newswars--2020-08-13--Twitter Censors Conservatives, But This Is Okay?

Action 7 discovers another ANTIFA-like Twitter account encouraging people to go to police officers homes , destroy property and ultimately @ @ @ @ @ who they deem “ fascists ” .

Action 7 discovers another ANTIFA-like Twitter account encouraging people to go to police officers homes, destroy property and ultimately links to a website doxxing who they deem “fascists”.


newswars--2020-08-13--Newsweek Apologizes After Legal Expert Claims Kamala Harris Doesn’t Qualify For VP

In an opinion article published by Newsweek on Wednesday titled , “ Some Questions for Kamala Harris About Eligibility , ” law professor John C. Eastman questioned Kamala Harris ’ eligibility vice president of The United States .
The article focused on the common debate among Constitutional scholars regarding the 12th Amendment .
According to the 12th Amendment , “ no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.
” Article II of the Constitution specifies that “ [ n ] o person except a natural born citizen…shall be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This being said , Eastman noted that neither of Harris ’ parents were naturalized U.S. citizens at the time of Kamala ’ s birth in 1964 .
Her father is from Jamaica , where the family business was owning slaves , and her mother is from India .
Because of her parents ’ status , Kamala is not technically a “ natural-born ” citizen and is therefore not eligible to serve as vice president .
Eastman explained how some scholars argue the 14th Amendment classifies a “ natural-born ” citizen as anyone who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he claimed these allegations are erroneous , explaining , “ The language of Article II is that one must be a natural-born citizen .
The original Constitution did not define citizenship , but the 14th Amendment does—and it provides that ‘ all persons born…in the United States , and subject to the jurisdiction thereof , are citizens.
’ Those who claim that birth alone is sufficient overlook the second phrase.
” “ The person must also be ‘ subject to the jurisdiction ’ of the United States , and that meant subject to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ partial jurisdiction such as that which applies to anyone temporarily sojourning in the United States ( whether lawfully or unlawfully ) , ” Eastman continued .
After making his case , Eastman maintained , “ Indeed , the Supreme Court has never held that anyone born on U.S. soil , no matter the circumstances of the parents , is automatically a U.S. citizen.
” In fact , when examining the original meaning of the 14th Amendment , the legal expert found Harris may not qualify for her current position as a U.S. senator @ @ @ @ @ @ @ made in the article , Eastman wrote , “ I have no doubt that this significant challenge to Harris ’ constitutional eligibility to the second-highest office in the land will be dismissed out of hand as so much antiquated constitutional tripe.
” “ But the concerns about divided allegiance that led our nation ’ s Founders to include the ‘ natural-born citizen ’ requirement for the office of president and commander-in-chief remain important ; indeed , with persistent threats from Russia , China and others to our sovereignty and electoral process , those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” he concluded .
Following cries of “ racism ” from Newsweek ‘ s leftist readers , the magazine issued an editor ’ s note stating , “ Some readers reacted strongly to this essay , seeing it as an attempt to ignite a racist conspiracy theory .
That is entirely inaccurate.
” Newsweek editors wrote a whole article defending the Eastman opinion piece and explaining to their reactionary followers that the op-ed was not written to create a race-based movement against Harris .
“ Editor ’ s Note : Eastman ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ With Racist Birtherism , ” the response post was titled .
Instead , the editors explain , Eastman ’ s article “ Was focusing on a long-standing , somewhat arcane legal debate about the precise meaning of the phrase ‘ subject to the jurisdiction thereof ’ in the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment.
” The outlet made sure to distance the Eastman piece from the “ birther ” theories that looked into the birthplace and suspicious birth certificate of Barack Obama in 2008 .
“ We share our readers ’ revulsion at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their base .
Will Eastman ’ s Constitutional concerns be debated on a national stage or will mainstream media dismiss such a conversation as a racist distraction ?

In an opinion article published by Newsweek on Wednesday titled, “Some Questions for Kamala Harris About Eligibility,” law professor John C. Eastman questioned Kamala Harris’ eligibility vice president of The United States.
The article focused on the common debate among Constitutional scholars regarding the 12th Amendment.
According to the 12th Amendment, “no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.”
Article II of the Constitution specifies that “[n]o person except a natural born citizen…shall be eligible to the office of President.”
This being said, Eastman noted that neither of Harris’ parents were naturalized U.S. citizens at the time of Kamala’s birth in 1964.
Her father is from Jamaica, where the family business was owning slaves, and her mother is from India.
Because of her parents’ status, Kamala is not technically a “natural-born” citizen and is therefore not eligible to serve as vice president.
Eastman explained how some scholars argue the 14th Amendment classifies a “natural-born” citizen as anyone who was born in America.
However, he claimed these allegations are erroneous, explaining, “The language of Article II is that one must be a natural-born citizen. The original Constitution did not define citizenship, but the 14th Amendment does—and it provides that ‘all persons born…in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.’ Those who claim that birth alone is sufficient overlook the second phrase.”
“The person must also be ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States, and that meant subject to the complete jurisdiction, not merely a partial jurisdiction such as that which applies to anyone temporarily sojourning in the United States (whether lawfully or unlawfully),” Eastman continued.
After making his case, Eastman maintained, “Indeed, the Supreme Court has never held that anyone born on U.S. soil, no matter the circumstances of the parents, is automatically a U.S. citizen.”
In fact, when examining the original meaning of the 14th Amendment, the legal expert found Harris may not qualify for her current position as a U.S. senator.
Foreseeing a backlash to the claims made in the article, Eastman wrote, “I have no doubt that this significant challenge to Harris’ constitutional eligibility to the second-highest office in the land will be dismissed out of hand as so much antiquated constitutional tripe.”
“But the concerns about divided allegiance that led our nation’s Founders to include the ‘natural-born citizen’ requirement for the office of president and commander-in-chief remain important; indeed, with persistent threats from Russia, China and others to our sovereignty and electoral process, those concerns are perhaps even more important today,” he concluded.
Following cries of “racism” from Newsweek‘s leftist readers, the magazine issued an editor’s note stating, “Some readers reacted strongly to this essay, seeing it as an attempt to ignite a racist conspiracy theory. That is entirely inaccurate.”
Newsweek editors wrote a whole article defending the Eastman opinion piece and explaining to their reactionary followers that the op-ed was not written to create a race-based movement against Harris.
“Editor’s Note: Eastman’s Newsweek Column Has Nothing to Do With Racist Birtherism,” the response post was titled.
Instead, the editors explain, Eastman’s article “Was focusing on a long-standing, somewhat arcane legal debate about the precise meaning of the phrase ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof’ in the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment.”
The outlet made sure to distance the Eastman piece from the “birther” theories that looked into the birthplace and suspicious birth certificate of Barack Obama in 2008.
“We share our readers’ revulsion at those vile lies,” Newsweek ensured their base.
Will Eastman’s Constitutional concerns be debated on a national stage or will mainstream media dismiss such a conversation as a racist distraction?


newswars--2020-08-13--France Deploys Jets, Warship to East Mediterranean Amid Turkey Gas Tensions

France is getting more deeply involved against Turkey ’ s eastern Mediterranean ambitions for expanded oil and gas exploration , reportedly sending fighter jets and a naval frigate near Cyprus in order to contest Turkey encroachment on EU members ’ territorial waters .
Cypriot media has confirmed that so far two French Rafale fighter jets and a C-130H support plane have landed at a base on the island , with international media noting Paris is further deploying the naval frigate ‘ Lafayette ’ to the region .
President Emmanuel Macron announced via a Twitter statement Wednesday : “ I have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ presence in the eastern Mediterranean in the coming days , in cooperation with European partners , including Greece.
” Earlier this week Turkey conducted its own military drills near Greek waters , off some of Greece ’ s easternmost islands , at a moment Erdogan confirmed the Oruc Reis seismic exploration ship had been dispatched with a military escort .
Macron had previously slammed Turkey ’ s expansionist claims , which mostly relies on interpreting waters around all of Cyprus as its own – given its claims over the so-called Turkish Republic of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unilateral ” prospecting .
Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis has hailed France ’ s military backing after long urging the EU to take more proactive action against Turkey ’ s energy exploration ambitions .
“ Emmanuel Macron is a true friend of Greece and a fervent defender of European values and international law , ” Mitsotakis tweeted in French after a phone call with Macron .
The Greek prime minister also told the US ambassador that he rejects NATO ’ s “ hands-off approach ” to the growing crisis .
“ I think @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this hands-off approach – that ‘ oh we have two NATO partners so we ’ re not going to go into the details ’ – is no longer going to be accepted by me .
I raised this with Secretary-General [ Jens ] Stoltenberg that we ’ re a NATO contributor and an ally and…when we feel that a NATO ally is behaving in a way that endangers our interests , we can not expect from NATO a similar approach of ‘ we don ’ t want to interfere in your internal differences.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” Mitsotakis said in Wednesday public comments .
Meanwhile on Thursday Greece and France are holding joint military drills near Crete .
It ’ s being widely interpreted as a clear “ message ” to Turkey of just how serious Macron is in backing Greece ’ s sovereignty over its territorial waters .
The spider at the center of the NWO web wants one thing .
Total power and control .

France is getting more deeply involved against Turkey’s eastern Mediterranean ambitions for expanded oil and gas exploration, reportedly sending fighter jets and a naval frigate near Cyprus in order to contest Turkey encroachment on EU members’ territorial waters.
Cypriot media has confirmed that so far two French Rafale fighter jets and a C-130H support plane have landed at a base on the island, with international media noting Paris is further deploying the naval frigate ‘Lafayette’ to the region.
President Emmanuel Macron announced via a Twitter statement Wednesday: “I have decided to temporarily reinforce the French military presence in the eastern Mediterranean in the coming days, in cooperation with European partners, including Greece.”
Earlier this week Turkey conducted its own military drills near Greek waters, off some of Greece’s easternmost islands, at a moment Erdogan confirmed the Oruc Reis seismic exploration ship had been dispatched with a military escort.
Macron had previously slammed Turkey’s expansionist claims, which mostly relies on interpreting waters around all of Cyprus as its own – given its claims over the so-called Turkish Republic of Cyprus – as an act of “unilateral” prospecting.
Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis has hailed France’s military backing after long urging the EU to take more proactive action against Turkey’s energy exploration ambitions. “Emmanuel Macron is a true friend of Greece and a fervent defender of European values and international law,” Mitsotakis tweeted in French after a phone call with Macron.
The Greek prime minister also told the US ambassador that he rejects NATO’s “hands-off approach” to the growing crisis.
“I think within NATO it is very clear that this hands-off approach – that ‘oh we have two NATO partners so we’re not going to go into the details’ – is no longer going to be accepted by me. I raised this with Secretary-General [Jens] Stoltenberg that we’re a NATO contributor and an ally and…when we feel that a NATO ally is behaving in a way that endangers our interests, we cannot expect from NATO a similar approach of ‘we don’t want to interfere in your internal differences.’ This is profoundly unfair for Greece,” Mitsotakis said in Wednesday public comments.
Meanwhile on Thursday Greece and France are holding joint military drills near Crete.
It’s being widely interpreted as a clear “message” to Turkey of just how serious Macron is in backing Greece’s sovereignty over its territorial waters.
The spider at the center of the NWO web wants one thing. Total power and control.


newswars--2020-08-13--Nunes: Obama, Biden Knew About Spying on the Trump Campaign

On Thursday , Fox Business anchor Maria Bartiromo interviewed President Trump .
Trump told Bartiromo that the Obama administration “ spied on my campaign , which is treason.
” “ President Obama knew everything .
Vice President Biden , as dumb as he may be , he knew everything .
And everybody else knew everything , Maria , and you know it .
And Comey and Brennan and Clapper , they all were terrible and they lied to Congress… ” After the president ’ s interview , Rep. Devin Nunes , the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ She asked Nunes about Trump ’ s comments about the spying on his campaign , and whether he agreed with Trump ’ s statement that it went all the way up to Obama and Biden .
“ It ’ s way worse than even we thought it was , ” Nunes told her .
“ And we knew it was really , really bad.
” Nunes then pointed out that , based on declassified notes , we know that it was Biden who suggested going after Flynn , based on the Logan Act @ @ @ @ @ @ @ previous administration knew that they were spying on the Trump campaign .
Joe Biden should have known at the time to put a halt to this .
So he is just as guilty as everybody else.
” Nunes explained that by “ guilty ” he didn ’ t mean that Biden specifically broke any laws , but “ he knew damn well that something was occurring , using our intelligence apparatus in this country … to target people that his party had just got their clocks cleaned by in 2016.
” In May @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) documents showed that President Obama was aware of the details of wiretapped conversations of then-incoming National Security Adviser Michael Flynn with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak back in December 2016 .
Joe Biden was also aware , and was present at a meeting discussing it .
“ On January 5 , 2017 , Yates attended an Oval Office meeting with then-FBI Director James Comey , then-Vice President Joe Biden , then-CIA Director John Brennan , and then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper , according to the newly declassified documents , including an FD-302 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ News ’ Gregg Re at the time .
“ They were discussing Russian election interference , along with national security adviser Susan Rice and other members of the national security council.
” The entire investigation of Trump and his associates was based on Russian disinformation , and the FBI “ used Russia ’ s meddling with the 2016 election as a pretext to investigate Donald Trump ” and those around him .
According to handwritten notes from Peter Strzok , it was Biden who suggested using the Logan Act to target Michael Flynn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ former Obama national security adviser Susan Rice sent to herself about the meeting saying Obama wanted everything done “ by the book.
” Former Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell noted , “ The Susan Rice email to herself clearly didn ’ t give an accurate portrayal of the meeting .
The ‘ right people ’ is fundamentally different than ‘ by the book.
’ ” The Justice Department dropped its case against Flynn on May 7 , in the wake of internal memos revealing the intent to entrap Flynn on perjury @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fired ” as national security adviser to President Trump .
Testimony transcripts declassified the same day showed that the Obama administration never had any empirical evidence of Russian collusion .
“ I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election , ” testified former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper in 2017 .
“ That ’ s not to say that there weren ’ t concerns about the evidence we were seeing , anecdotal evidence .
… @ @ @ @ @ @ @ where I had direct evidence.
” “ I am not in possession of anything—I am not in possession and didn ’ t read or absorb information that came from out of the intelligence community , ” said former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power , in response to the same question .
“ To the best of my recollection , there wasn ’ t anything smoking , but there were some things that gave me pause , ” said Obama national security adviser Susan Rice with regard to conspiracy .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I would consider evidence to that effect that I saw…conspiracy prior to my departure.
” When asked if she ever saw evidence of coordination , she answered , “ I don ’ t recall any intelligence or evidence to that effect.
” She gave the same answer when asked about collusion .
Obama ’ s former deputy national security adviser , Ben Rhodes , also had nothing .
“ I wouldn ’ t have received any information on any criminal or counterintelligence investigations into what the Trump campaign was doing , so I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” he said .
“ I saw indications of potential coordination , but I did not see , you know , the specific evidence of the actions of the Trump campaign.
” Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch said she did “ not recall that being briefed up to me.
” When asked about the accuracy and legitimacy of the Steele dossier , former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe admitted they were never able to prove its legitimacy .
When asked what was the most “ damning or important piece of evidence in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is true , ” McCabe replied , “ We have not been able to prove the accuracy of all the information.
” The spider at the center of the NWO web wants one thing .
Total power and control .

On Thursday, Fox Business anchor Maria Bartiromo interviewed President Trump. Trump told Bartiromo that the Obama administration “spied on my campaign, which is treason.”
“President Obama knew everything. Vice President Biden, as dumb as he may be, he knew everything. And everybody else knew everything, Maria, and you know it. And Comey and Brennan and Clapper, they all were terrible and they lied to Congress…”
After the president’s interview, Rep. Devin Nunes, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, appeared on Bartiromo’s show. She asked Nunes about Trump’s comments about the spying on his campaign, and whether he agreed with Trump’s statement that it went all the way up to Obama and Biden.
“It’s way worse than even we thought it was,” Nunes told her. “And we knew it was really, really bad.”
Nunes then pointed out that, based on declassified notes, we know that it was Biden who suggested going after Flynn, based on the Logan Act.
“So, clearly, the previous administration knew that they were spying on the Trump campaign. Joe Biden should have known at the time to put a halt to this. So he is just as guilty as everybody else.”
Nunes explained that by “guilty” he didn’t mean that Biden specifically broke any laws, but “he knew damn well that something was occurring, using our intelligence apparatus in this country … to target people that his party had just got their clocks cleaned by in 2016.”
In May, declassified Department of Justice (DOJ) documents showed that President Obama was aware of the details of wiretapped conversations of then-incoming National Security Adviser Michael Flynn with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak back in December 2016. Joe Biden was also aware, and was present at a meeting discussing it.
“On January 5, 2017, Yates attended an Oval Office meeting with then-FBI Director James Comey, then-Vice President Joe Biden, then-CIA Director John Brennan, and then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, according to the newly declassified documents, including an FD-302 FBI witness report,” reported Fox News’ Gregg Re at the time. “They were discussing Russian election interference, along with national security adviser Susan Rice and other members of the national security council.”
The entire investigation of Trump and his associates was based on Russian disinformation, and the FBI “used Russia’s meddling with the 2016 election as a pretext to investigate Donald Trump” and those around him.
According to handwritten notes from Peter Strzok, it was Biden who suggested using the Logan Act to target Michael Flynn.
These notes contradicted an email that former Obama national security adviser Susan Rice sent to herself about the meeting saying Obama wanted everything done “by the book.” Former Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell noted, “The Susan Rice email to herself clearly didn’t give an accurate portrayal of the meeting. The ‘right people’ is fundamentally different than ‘by the book.’”
This is very troubling. The Susan Rice email to herself clearly didn’t give an accurate portrayal of the meeting.
The “right people” is fundamentally different than “by the book”. https://t.co/AYs3oZ7qaX — Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) June 24, 2020
The Justice Department dropped its case against Flynn on May 7, in the wake of internal memos revealing the intent to entrap Flynn on perjury charges in order to “get him fired” as national security adviser to President Trump. Testimony transcripts declassified the same day showed that the Obama administration never had any empirical evidence of Russian collusion.
“I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election,” testified former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper in 2017. “That’s not to say that there weren’t concerns about the evidence we were seeing, anecdotal evidence. … But I do not recall any instance where I had direct evidence.”
“I am not in possession of anything—I am not in possession and didn’t read or absorb information that came from out of the intelligence community,” said former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power, in response to the same question.
“To the best of my recollection, there wasn’t anything smoking, but there were some things that gave me pause,” said Obama national security adviser Susan Rice with regard to conspiracy. “I don’t recall intelligence that I would consider evidence to that effect that I saw…conspiracy prior to my departure.”
When asked if she ever saw evidence of coordination, she answered, “I don’t recall any intelligence or evidence to that effect.” She gave the same answer when asked about collusion.
Obama’s former deputy national security adviser, Ben Rhodes, also had nothing. “I wouldn’t have received any information on any criminal or counterintelligence investigations into what the Trump campaign was doing, so I would not have seen that information,” he said. “I saw indications of potential coordination, but I did not see, you know, the specific evidence of the actions of the Trump campaign.”
Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch said she did “not recall that being briefed up to me.”
When asked about the accuracy and legitimacy of the Steele dossier, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe admitted they were never able to prove its legitimacy. When asked what was the most “damning or important piece of evidence in the dossier that” he “now knows is true,” McCabe replied, “We have not been able to prove the accuracy of all the information.”
Watch the Nunes interview here:
The spider at the center of the NWO web wants one thing. Total power and control.