newswars--2020-07-09--The Mask as a Symbol of Subjugation

The Mask as a Symbol of Subjugation

It ’ s difficult to imagine a crueler attack on the human family than the insidious prevention of person-to-person contact .
What amounts to house arrest , plus enforced wearing of masks , plus the order to stay a body length from others , has the stated aim of preventing contagion , but as philosopher Giogio Agamben put it recently , “ It is political contagion , let it be understood ” .
He ’ s correct .
The contagion that must be checked is not viral but political .
The triad of official mandates hinders communication that can not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ political discourse and strategy can be recorded for the individual ’ s dossier .
In the street not so , at least not yet .
In 1933 , Hitler suspended the Weimar Constitution following the Reichstag fire .
Citizen rights under that Constitution were abolished and never reinstated .
A similar drama continues to play out in the United States since the 9/11 attack , which resulted in the Patriot Act ( of ironic title ) that trashes the U.S. Constitution , resulting in free rein for the nation ’ s intelligence organizations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The First Amendment is being negated according to someone ’ s definition of “ hate speech ” or “ community standards ” , with entire sites of information and opinion being “ deplatformed ” .
The Fourth Amendment is a hollow lie in that each citizen ’ s every act is recorded toward that planned-for day in which all activities are digitally recorded , and woe betide creative souls who offend the rules .
The lockdown was never really about a pandemic .
Covid19 was just the pretext .
Bill Gates himself @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) that earlier SARS and MERS were more “ fatal , ” i.e.
, more lethal , than Covid19 , yet they came and went without crashing the economy .
But more than just the economy , it was day-to-day existence as we all live it that was a prime target of the lockdown .
Ending the lockdown tomorrow would not counter the damage already done .
We ’ ve been psychologically mauled , and there ’ s no end in sight .
Warnings of “ spikes ” and of future waves come @ @ @ @ @ @ @ businesses are being lost , but it is the devastating psychological impact that permeates society throughout that is inescapable .
The emotional and spiritual damage will not be healing anytime soon .
As intended , we are disoriented and will be for decades as the “ conspiring internationalists ” , so-called by David Rockefeller , prepare us for a life according to their globalist design .
The cloth masks seen everywhere now are symbolic .
However useful in stopping airborne droplets , they do not hinder the passage of viruses , made clear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the type of mask commonly seen .
The media ’ s favorite expert , Anthony Fauci , stated flatly on CBS 60 Minutes in March that “ There ’ s no reason to be walking around with a mask ” .
Two months later , as lockdown demands intensified , his stance shifted to the mask as “ a symbol for people to see ” .
Review articles indicating that masks are ineffective , or even counterproductive , rarely make it to mainstream viewers , or they are simply disappeared .
But symbol @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of subjugation .
Living fully and free carries a normal level of risk .
In addition to assorted germs and parasites that are a part of nature , there are lightning strikes , auto collisions , falling down stairs and being victimized by criminals — primarily elements within our governing structures .
We are being conned with a manufactured terror campaign by a power bloc that considers the bulk of ordinary society a herd to be manipulated .
The many who understand this , but who nevertheless wear a mask simply to conform @ @ @ @ @ @ @ agreement , are allowing themselves to become part of the con .
Take the damned thing off !
Breathe free !
Owen and Peggy Hall dive deep into the science behind masks , and how the CDC and OSHA hide the truth .

It’s difficult to imagine a crueler attack on the human family than the insidious prevention of person-to-person contact. What amounts to house arrest, plus enforced wearing of masks, plus the order to stay a body length from others, has the stated aim of preventing contagion, but as philosopher Giogio Agamben put it recently, “It is political contagion, let it be understood”. He’s correct. The contagion that must be checked is not viral but political. The triad of official mandates hinders communication that cannot be monitored. If online, unauthorized political discourse and strategy can be recorded for the individual’s dossier. In the street not so, at least not yet.
In 1933, Hitler suspended the Weimar Constitution following the Reichstag fire. Citizen rights under that Constitution were abolished and never reinstated. A similar drama continues to play out in the United States since the 9/11 attack, which resulted in the Patriot Act (of ironic title) that trashes the U.S. Constitution, resulting in free rein for the nation’s intelligence organizations in concert with the social media giants. The First Amendment is being negated according to someone’s definition of “hate speech” or “community standards”, with entire sites of information and opinion being “deplatformed”. The Fourth Amendment is a hollow lie in that each citizen’s every act is recorded toward that planned-for day in which all activities are digitally recorded, and woe betide creative souls who offend the rules.
The lockdown was never really about a pandemic. Covid19 was just the pretext. Bill Gates himself admitted (in an unguarded moment?) that earlier SARS and MERS were more “fatal,” i.e., more lethal, than Covid19, yet they came and went without crashing the economy. But more than just the economy, it was day-to-day existence as we all live it that was a prime target of the lockdown. Ending the lockdown tomorrow would not counter the damage already done. We’ve been psychologically mauled, and there’s no end in sight. Warnings of “spikes” and of future waves come daily. Yes, countless jobs and businesses are being lost, but it is the devastating psychological impact that permeates society throughout that is inescapable. The emotional and spiritual damage will not be healing anytime soon. As intended, we are disoriented and will be for decades as the “conspiring internationalists”, so-called by David Rockefeller, prepare us for a life according to their globalist design.
The cloth masks seen everywhere now are symbolic. However useful in stopping airborne droplets, they do not hinder the passage of viruses, made clear by the warning on a box of the type of mask commonly seen. The media’s favorite expert, Anthony Fauci, stated flatly on CBS 60 Minutes in March that “There’s no reason to be walking around with a mask”. Two months later, as lockdown demands intensified, his stance shifted to the mask as “a symbol for people to see”. Review articles indicating that masks are ineffective, or even counterproductive, rarely make it to mainstream viewers, or they are simply disappeared. But symbol the mask certainly is — a symbol of subjugation.
Living fully and free carries a normal level of risk. In addition to assorted germs and parasites that are a part of nature, there are lightning strikes, auto collisions, falling down stairs and being victimized by criminals — primarily elements within our governing structures. We are being conned with a manufactured terror campaign by a power bloc that considers the bulk of ordinary society a herd to be manipulated. The many who understand this, but who nevertheless wear a mask simply to conform to what they assume to be majority agreement, are allowing themselves to become part of the con. Take the damned thing off! Breathe free!
Owen and Peggy Hall dive deep into the science behind masks, and how the CDC and OSHA hide the truth.


newswars--2020-07-09--Video: Joe Biden Struggles to Say “America First”

A video clip shows Joe Biden struggling to say “ America First , ” leading to speculation as to whether he is hostile to the phrase or just forgot the words .
Speaking about Trump , Biden stated , “ This guy ’ s whole idea of America , ” before pausing .
“ America on its own has meant America alone , we ’ re out there by ourselves.
” While some claimed Biden couldn ’ t bring himself to use the phrase , it ’ s more likely that he just had another senior moment .
Back in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ phrase “ America First , ” but then went on to embarrass himself by suggesting such a policy approach would prohibit “ economic intercourse around the world.
” Biden ’ s cognitive functioning has repeatedly been called into question , including last week by White House physician Dr. Ronny Jackson .
“ I think that he ’ s old enough now that he ’ s having cognitive difficulties and that just happens .
It ’ s part of growing old , ” said Jackson .
“ If [ Trump ] goes head-to-head with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t be much of an assessment .
It will be very one-sided.
” Last month , Biden asserted that he is “ constantly tested ” for cognitive decline .
“ Look , all you got to do is watch me and I can hardly wait to compare my cognitive capability to the cognitive capability of the man I ’ m running against , ” Biden declared .
Polls show that 38 per cent of American voters think Biden has “ some form of dementia , ” including one in five Democrats .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever .
It is CRUCIAL that you support me .
Please sign up for the free newsletter here .
Donate to me on SubscribeStar here .
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown .

A video clip shows Joe Biden struggling to say “America First,” leading to speculation as to whether he is hostile to the phrase or just forgot the words.
Speaking about Trump, Biden stated, “This guy’s whole idea of America,” before pausing. “America on its own has meant America alone, we’re out there by ourselves.”
While some claimed Biden couldn’t bring himself to use the phrase, it’s more likely that he just had another senior moment.
Back in April, Biden managed to remember the phrase “America First,” but then went on to embarrass himself by suggesting such a policy approach would prohibit “economic intercourse around the world.”
Biden’s cognitive functioning has repeatedly been called into question, including last week by White House physician Dr. Ronny Jackson.
“I think that he’s old enough now that he’s having cognitive difficulties and that just happens. It’s part of growing old,” said Jackson. “If [Trump] goes head-to-head with Joe Biden cognitively, there just wouldn’t be much of an assessment. It will be very one-sided.”
Last month, Biden asserted that he is “constantly tested” for cognitive decline.
“Look, all you got to do is watch me and I can hardly wait to compare my cognitive capability to the cognitive capability of the man I’m running against,” Biden declared.
Polls show that 38 per cent of American voters think Biden has “some form of dementia,” including one in five Democrats.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me.
Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-07-09--Australian Public Housing Tenants Caught Off Guard By Forced COVID Lockdown

An estimated 3,000 tenants of 9 separate public housing blocks in Australia were suddenly placed on lockdown Saturday following a declaration by Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews .
The Australian Broadcasting Corporation reported , “ Dima Abdu and her family had no idea the tower block they live in had been locked down until hours after it was suddenly announced by Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews on Saturday.
” “ My mum called me and said , ‘ I ’ m getting all these missed calls ’ , ” Abdu said .
“ I realised we were in complete lockdown , as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for exercise , can ’ t go get groceries or any essentials either — that surprised me.
” Families stuck inside the towers are being fed by groups working with the government .
A social worker named Ahmed Dini who hasn ’ t been able to leave his apartment since the lockdown said , “ I haven ’ t stepped outside , not for a second .
I open my door just to look at some of the food that was dropped to me.
” Will authoritarian lockdowns of public housing units come @ @ @ @

An estimated 3,000 tenants of 9 separate public housing blocks in Australia were suddenly placed on lockdown Saturday following a declaration by Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews.
The Australian Broadcasting Corporation reported, “Dima Abdu and her family had no idea the tower block they live in had been locked down until hours after it was suddenly announced by Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews on Saturday.”
“My mum called me and said, ‘I’m getting all these missed calls’,” Abdu said. “I realised we were in complete lockdown, as in, can’t go out for exercise, can’t go get groceries or any essentials either — that surprised me.”
Families stuck inside the towers are being fed by groups working with the government.
A social worker named Ahmed Dini who hasn’t been able to leave his apartment since the lockdown said, “I haven’t stepped outside, not for a second. I open my door just to look at some of the food that was dropped to me.”
Will authoritarian lockdowns of public housing units come to America next?


newswars--2020-07-09--Sheriffs Around The Country Refuse To Become “Mask Police”

Sheriffs around the country are pushing back against “ draconian mask laws ” being imposed by local and state governments .
From Texas to Ohio , as well as several other states , law enforcement officers are speaking out about the difficulty of enforcing such orders and questioning the legality of the decrees altogether .
Following Texas Governor Greg Abbott ’ s executive order requiring face masks to be worn when “ in public , ” several police officials announced they will not enforce the mandate .
Sheriffs in Houston , Gregg , Montgomery , Panola , Upshur , Gillespie @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have all made public statements on the matter .
Denton County Sheriff Tracy Murphree explained his decision on Facebook , writing , “ The order is not a law , there is no requirement that any police officer enforce it , and it ’ s unenforceable .
We can ’ t spend our time running from place to place for calls about mask we can really do nothing about.
” Houston Police Officers ’ Union President Joe Gamaldi also shared his opinion , writing on Twitter , “ While we in law enforcement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ community and are spread incredibly thin with the huge rise in violent crime , we are now expexcted to enforce yet another draconian mask law .
Everyone needs to wear a mask , but don ’ t put us in this position.
” Texas ’ Montgomery County Sheriff ’ s office argued language used in the governor ’ s executive order doesn ’ t allow them to enforce the mask mandate .
“ This language strips law enforcement of the necessary tools to enforce compliance with the law , ” the office wrote @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s office also explained that stopping individuals in order to write citations is defined as detention under current Texas law , which could subject officers to civial liability .
In Ohio , Butler County Police Sheriff Richard K. Jones told CNN on Wednesday , “ I ’ m not going to be the mask police , ” when asked about the state ’ s mandatory face mask order .
He added , “ I ’ m telling people don ’ t call 911 .
All the police have been decimated as far @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cut and I am not going to enforce the mask wearing.
” Another Ohio sheriff , Montgomery County ’ s Rob Streck , reminded citizens not to call the police over mandatory mask violations .
“ We ’ d like to remind the public that 911 should only be used in the case of an emergency to ensure that those who need immediate , life-saving help can get the attention they need without delay , ” he said .
“ Please do not call 911 to report people who may not be complying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Cincinnati , Ohio Police Department echoed Sheriff Streck ’ s message , telling citizens to call the Health Department instead of police .
“ Citizens should not call our local emergency communications center ( 9-1-1 ) or the non-emergency number ( 765-1212 ) if they observe a potential violation of this order , ” the department said in a statement .
“ If a potential violation of this mandate is observed it should be directed to the local Health Department officials.
” Ohio ’ s Norwood Police Department also told citizens to call @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not be enforcing ” the order .
“ The Norwood Police Dept will not be enforcing this Health Dept order and ask if you have concerns to please call our Norwood Health Dept and not our non-emergency line or E-911 .
We will assist our Health Dept if they request assistance , ” a statement read .
Three sheriffs in North Carolina have announced their refusal to enforce the state ’ s mandatory mask order with one county Sheriff ’ s Office saying they “ will not be taking enforcement actions to wit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for not wearing masks.
” “ The wearing of a mask is a personal decision , not one of a governor in Raleigh , ” Halifax County Sheriff Wes Tripps explained .
North Carolina ’ s Craven County Sheriff Chip Hughes went to Facebook to tell citizens his deuputies “ will not be taking enforcement actions against people or businesses for not wearing masks !
” Another North Carolina sheriff wrote on Facebook , “ It is my belief that Governor Cooper ’ s executive order mandating face coverings by all citizens in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unenforceable.
” “ My deputies will NOT enforce an executive order that I feel violates the constitutional liberties of citizens , ” Sampson County Sheriff Jimmy Thompson continued .
“ I am not encouraging negligence , but I would like to reiterate that it is not the Sheriff ’ s duty to enforce health related mandates unless court ordered by a Judicial Official or the Legislature.
” A Washington state sheriff , Robert Snaza of Lewis County , made a statement during a viral video released in late June , saying , “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hear , Governor Inslee , in his infinite wisdom , has decided after over a hundred and some odd days that we should all wear face masks — inside and out .
Here ’ s what I say : Don ’ t be a sheep.
” If more law enforcement agencies stand up for the Constitution and the rights of Americans and refuse to enforce mandatory mask orders , what will overzealous politicians do next ?

Sheriffs around the country are pushing back against “draconian mask laws” being imposed by local and state governments.
From Texas to Ohio, as well as several other states, law enforcement officers are speaking out about the difficulty of enforcing such orders and questioning the legality of the decrees altogether.
Following Texas Governor Greg Abbott’s executive order requiring face masks to be worn when “in public,” several police officials announced they will not enforce the mandate.
Sheriffs in Houston, Gregg, Montgomery, Panola, Upshur, Gillespie, Kerr, Nacogdoches and Denton counties have all made public statements on the matter.
Denton County Sheriff Tracy Murphree explained his decision on Facebook, writing, “The order is not a law, there is no requirement that any police officer enforce it, and it’s unenforceable. We can’t spend our time running from place to place for calls about mask we can really do nothing about.”
Houston Police Officers’ Union President Joe Gamaldi also shared his opinion, writing on Twitter, “While we in law enforcement are desperately trying to build trust w/our community and are spread incredibly thin with the huge rise in violent crime, we are now expexcted to enforce yet another draconian mask law. Everyone needs to wear a mask, but don’t put us in this position.”
While we in law enforcement are desperately trying to build trust w/our community and are spread incredibly thin with the huge rise in violent crime, we are now expexcted to enforce yet another draconian mask law. Everyone needs to wear a mask, but don’t put us in this position. — Joe Gamaldi (@JoeGamaldi) July 2, 2020
Texas’ Montgomery County Sheriff’s office argued language used in the governor’s executive order doesn’t allow them to enforce the mask mandate.
“This language strips law enforcement of the necessary tools to enforce compliance with the law,” the office wrote on Facebook.
The Montrogmery County Sheriff’s office also explained that stopping individuals in order to write citations is defined as detention under current Texas law, which could subject officers to civial liability.
In Ohio, Butler County Police Sheriff Richard K. Jones told CNN on Wednesday, “I’m not going to be the mask police,” when asked about the state’s mandatory face mask order.
He added, “I’m telling people don’t call 911. All the police have been decimated as far as being laid off, having budgets cut and I am not going to enforce the mask wearing.”
See the interview below:
Another Ohio sheriff, Montgomery County’s Rob Streck, reminded citizens not to call the police over mandatory mask violations.
“We’d like to remind the public that 911 should only be used in the case of an emergency to ensure that those who need immediate, life-saving help can get the attention they need without delay,” he said. “Please do not call 911 to report people who may not be complying with the mandated mask order.”
The Cincinnati, Ohio Police Department echoed Sheriff Streck’s message, telling citizens to call the Health Department instead of police.
“Citizens should not call our local emergency communications center (9-1-1) or the non-emergency number (765-1212) if they observe a potential violation of this order,” the department said in a statement. “If a potential violation of this mandate is observed it should be directed to the local Health Department officials.”
Ohio’s Norwood Police Department also told citizens to call the Health Department as officers “will not be enforcing” the order.
“The Norwood Police Dept will not be enforcing this Health Dept order and ask if you have concerns to please call our Norwood Health Dept and not our non-emergency line or E-911. We will assist our Health Dept if they request assistance,” a statement read.
Three sheriffs in North Carolina have announced their refusal to enforce the state’s mandatory mask order with one county Sheriff’s Office saying they “will not be taking enforcement actions to wit, issuing citations against people or businesses for not wearing masks.”
“The wearing of a mask is a personal decision, not one of a governor in Raleigh,” Halifax County Sheriff Wes Tripps explained.
North Carolina’s Craven County Sheriff Chip Hughes went to Facebook to tell citizens his deuputies “will not be taking enforcement actions against people or businesses for not wearing masks!”
Another North Carolina sheriff wrote on Facebook, “It is my belief that Governor Cooper’s executive order mandating face coverings by all citizens in public is not only unconstitutional, but unenforceable.”
“My deputies will NOT enforce an executive order that I feel violates the constitutional liberties of citizens,” Sampson County Sheriff Jimmy Thompson continued. “I am not encouraging negligence, but I would like to reiterate that it is not the Sheriff’s duty to enforce health related mandates unless court ordered by a Judicial Official or the Legislature.”
A Washington state sheriff, Robert Snaza of Lewis County, made a statement during a viral video released in late June, saying, “In case you guys didn’t hear, Governor Inslee, in his infinite wisdom, has decided after over a hundred and some odd days that we should all wear face masks — inside and out. Here’s what I say: Don’t be a sheep.”
If more law enforcement agencies stand up for the Constitution and the rights of Americans and refuse to enforce mandatory mask orders, what will overzealous politicians do next?


newswars--2020-07-09--West Vancouver Police: Driver Carried Out “Gesture of Hate” For Skidding on Pride Crosswalk

West Vancouver Police accused a man of carrying out a “ gesture of hate ” for ‘ defacing ’ a rainbow-colored gay pride crosswalk after he left tire marks on the road .
“ On July 7 , 2020 at 4:04 pm staff inside the police station heard a loud and sustained tire squealing outside , ” according to the West Vancouver Police website .
“ When officers took a closer look , they discovered that someone had just left tire marks across a portion of the crosswalk , at the intersection of 16th St and Esquimalt Ave. ” The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ speed but has since been identified by authorities .
“ This is very upsetting , ” said Cst .
Kevin Goodmurphy .
“ For whatever reason , this person has chosen to leave a gesture of hate on a crosswalk that stands for the exact opposite.
” The “ gesture of hate ” is a tire skid mark that covers part of the crosswalk but is by no means substantial .
Respondents to the tweet questioned whether West Vancouver Police should be concentrating on finding more dangerous criminals than those who leave tire @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you look closely , there are hardly any skid marks on the white stripe .
This driver must have been homophobic AND a white supremacist , ” joked one respondent .
“ Have you started an investigation into yourselves for having the nerve to stand on it ?
” asked another .
“ I understand that Vancouver has no serious crime and needs to classify a traffic violation as a hate-crime to make the job of the police more interesting before it gets defunded , or is this business as usual for Canadian @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It remains to be seen whether the culprit will be charged with a hate crime .
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever .
It is CRUCIAL that you support me .
Please sign up for the free newsletter here .
Donate to me on SubscribeStar here .
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown .

West Vancouver Police accused a man of carrying out a “gesture of hate” for ‘defacing’ a rainbow-colored gay pride crosswalk after he left tire marks on the road.
“On July 7, 2020 at 4:04 pm staff inside the police station heard a loud and sustained tire squealing outside,” according to the West Vancouver Police website. “When officers took a closer look, they discovered that someone had just left tire marks across a portion of the crosswalk, at the intersection of 16th St and Esquimalt Ave.”
The man then left the area at high speed but has since been identified by authorities.
“This is very upsetting,” said Cst. Kevin Goodmurphy. “For whatever reason, this person has chosen to leave a gesture of hate on a crosswalk that stands for the exact opposite.”
Investigators would like to speak with the driver responsible for defacing a recently installed Pride crosswalk at 16th St. and Esquimalt Ave. If you have information, please call 604-925-7300. https://t.co/ywkNR4DMAv pic.twitter.com/ViW0ZxcxYN — West Vancouver PD (@WestVanPolice) July 8, 2020
The “gesture of hate” is a tire skid mark that covers part of the crosswalk but is by no means substantial.
Respondents to the tweet questioned whether West Vancouver Police should be concentrating on finding more dangerous criminals than those who leave tire marks on the road.
“If you look closely, there are hardly any skid marks on the white stripe. This driver must have been homophobic AND a white supremacist,” joked one respondent.
If you look closely, there are hardly any skid marks on the white stripe. This driver must have been homophobic AND a white supremacist. — Alphazero (@Caturman) July 9, 2020
“Have you started an investigation into yourselves for having the nerve to stand on it?” asked another.
have you started an investigation into yourselves for having the nerve to stand on it? pic.twitter.com/Lnh6lPFTep — TheRealMeans ⭐⭐⭐ (@TheRealMeans) July 9, 2020
“I understand that Vancouver has no serious crime and needs to classify a traffic violation as a hate-crime to make the job of the police more interesting before it gets defunded, or is this business as usual for Canadian police?” commented another Twitter user.
I understand that Vancouver has no serious crime and needs to classify a traffic violation as a hate-crime to make the job of the police more interesting before it gets defunded, or is this business as usual for Canadian police? — ofehrmedia.press (@OfehrmediaPress) July 9, 2020
It remains to be seen whether the culprit will be charged with a hate crime.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me.
Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-07-09--Pelosi on Leftist Mob Tearing Down Columbus Statue: “People will do what they do”

During a press conference Thursday , House Speaker Nancy Pelosi essentially gave a pass to the numerous mobs of radical leftists that have been toppling statues throughout the country .
Pelosi appeared to dismiss concerns from a reporter who asked if the statues should be taken down in an orderly civil fashion that involves local governments .
“ Shouldn ’ t that be done by a commission or the city council , not a mob in the middle of the night throwing it into a harbor ?
” a reporter asked , referring to a statue of Christopher Columbus that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Harbor on July 4th .
“ People will do what they do , ” Pelosi responded , before quickly realizing she should clarify her remark .
“ I do think from a safety standpoint it would be a good idea to have it taken down if the community doesn ’ t want it .
I don ’ t know if it has to be a commission.
” She went on to say the Founding Fathers wouldn ’ t care whether or not statues were torn down , as long as its done with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ …They would want us to be talking about the future , your future .
so everything we do here is about you… They would want it to be about looking forward , not looking back .
So let ’ s just think about what are the values , the vision , the perspective that we enshrine , and how that benefits our children , rather than having a big fight about ‘ Was somebody worth it ?
’ We know they ’ re not worth it if they committed treason against @ @ @ @ @ @ @ presser , Pelosi also alleged President Trump had received money from Russia when asked by a reporter whether she was disappointed the American people wouldn ’ t see his tax returns by election day .
Frederick Douglass , whose statue was torn down , had much to say about America ’ s Founding Fathers & liberty in his 5th of July speech 168 yrs ago .

During a press conference Thursday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi essentially gave a pass to the numerous mobs of radical leftists that have been toppling statues throughout the country.
Pelosi appeared to dismiss concerns from a reporter who asked if the statues should be taken down in an orderly civil fashion that involves local governments.
Speaker Pelosi on the Christopher Columbus statue in Baltimore: REPORTER: “Shouldn’t that be done by a commission or the city council, not a mob in the middle of the night throwing it into a harbor?” PELOSI: “People will do what they do.”pic.twitter.com/1iullgBmsR — Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) July 9, 2020
“Shouldn’t that be done by a commission or the city council, not a mob in the middle of the night throwing it into a harbor?” a reporter asked, referring to a statue of Christopher Columbus that was chucked into Baltimore’s Inner Harbor on July 4th.
“People will do what they do,” Pelosi responded, before quickly realizing she should clarify her remark.
“I do think from a safety standpoint it would be a good idea to have it taken down if the community doesn’t want it. I don’t know if it has to be a commission.”
She went on to say the Founding Fathers wouldn’t care whether or not statues were torn down, as long as its done with the country’s future in mind.
“…They would want us to be talking about the future, your future. so everything we do here is about you… They would want it to be about looking forward, not looking back. So let’s just think about what are the values, the vision, the perspective that we enshrine, and how that benefits our children, rather than having a big fight about ‘Was somebody worth it?’ We know they’re not worth it if they committed treason against the United States.”
Elsewhere during the presser, Pelosi also alleged President Trump had received money from Russia when asked by a reporter whether she was disappointed the American people wouldn’t see his tax returns by election day.
REPORTER: “Are you disappointed that Congress & the American public won’t see [Trump’s] records before November?” PELOSI: “…We’d like to know how Russia funded his operations all those years… What was at stake was, is the president above the law?” pic.twitter.com/NmhJ0BBZKK — Breaking911 (@Breaking911) July 9, 2020
Follow the author on Gab: https://gab.ai/adansalazar
On Twitter: Follow @AdanSalazarWins
On Parler: https://parler.com/profile/adansalazar
On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/adan.salazar.735
On Minds: https://www.minds.com/adan_infowars
Frederick Douglass, whose statue was torn down, had much to say about America’s Founding Fathers & liberty in his 5th of July speech 168 yrs ago.


newswars--2020-07-09--Watch: ANTIFA Attempts To Silence Pro-Police Protest

After her last demonstration , Savanah Hernandez decided to plan her own peaceful rally to stand for police , but @ @ @ @ @ silence her message .
Watch Savanah ’ s previous confrontation with protesters outside the Austin @ @ @ @ @ .

After her last demonstration, Savanah Hernandez decided to plan her own peaceful rally to stand for police, but ANTIFA again, wanted to silence her message.
Watch Savanah’s previous confrontation with protesters outside the Austin City Council in late June.


newswars--2020-07-09--UN Watchdog Gives Syria 90 Days to Declare Chemical Weapons

Syria has until October to declare to the UN chemical weapons watchdog its stockpile of illegal toxins or face “ appropriate action , ” the OPCW executive council agreed Thursday .
An investigative team of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons concluded in April that the Syrian government used sarin and chlorine in aerial attacks on the town of Ltamenah in March 2017 , hurting dozens of people .
The OPCW ’ s 41-member executive council requested in its decision that Syria “ declare to the Secretariat all of the chemical weapons it currently possesses… as well as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ facilities.
” It is also expected to declare facilities where the chemical weapons used in the attacks on March 24 , 25 , and 30 in 2017 were developed , produced , stockpiled and stored for delivery .
If Syria fails to “ redress the situation , ” the council warned it will recommend action against it at the next annual conference of all 193 member states , scheduled from November 30 to December 4 .
Syria has repeatedly denied using chemical weapons after having them destroyed as part of a Russia-brokered agreement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ accuses militants of staging chemical attacks , used by Western powers to justify strikes on its territory in 2018 .

Syria has until October to declare to the UN chemical weapons watchdog its stockpile of illegal toxins or face “appropriate action,” the OPCW executive council agreed Thursday.
An investigative team of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons concluded in April that the Syrian government used sarin and chlorine in aerial attacks on the town of Ltamenah in March 2017, hurting dozens of people.
The OPCW’s 41-member executive council requested in its decision that Syria “declare to the Secretariat all of the chemical weapons it currently possesses… as well as chemical weapons production facilities and other related facilities.”
It is also expected to declare facilities where the chemical weapons used in the attacks on March 24, 25, and 30 in 2017 were developed, produced, stockpiled and stored for delivery.
If Syria fails to “redress the situation,” the council warned it will recommend action against it at the next annual conference of all 193 member states, scheduled from November 30 to December 4.
Syria has repeatedly denied using chemical weapons after having them destroyed as part of a Russia-brokered agreement with OPCW in 2013. The government accuses militants of staging chemical attacks, used by Western powers to justify strikes on its territory in 2018.
The response to Covid-19 mirrors Communist Chinese brainwashing torture techniques.


newswars--2020-07-09--Why the EU Continues to Fight Brexit

Why the EU Continues to Fight Brexit

The 2016 Brexit referendum was the culmination of a debate which had been ongoing for years .
While the Leave promoted rhetoric targeting the EU as an illegitimate and despotic entity threatening the freedom of all British citizens , the EU institutions together with politics and media supporting the Remain disregarded most of the concerns raised by the Leave to focus on the pieces which could be easily labeled as either xenophobic or anti-European .
It was difficult to find any constructive conversation about the motivations of citizens supporting the leave option .
Nevertheless , listening to what the Leave @ @ @ @ @ @ @ complex of interconnected issues about what the EU has become and what perspectives the EU proposes for the future .
But opposition to the EU has long been about the growing power of the EU bureaucracy over the member states and their populations .
During his last speech in front of the EU parliament , UK deputy Nigel Farage summarized his viewpoint by reminding them that the UK had signed an agreement to facilitate business relationships , reciprocity , and exchanges of scientific and technical expertise , all of this to foster collaborations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the initial agreements never included the legal framework for the implementation of a bureaucracy made up of unelected technocrats interfering with affairs normally controlled by the states .
He also reminded his audience what problems appear and worsen with bureaucracies designed so that a minority of individuals is granted power without accountability .
Brexit in a Nutshell : What Is ( Really ) at Stake The EU ’ s power rests in many ways on its revenue , and this is among the reasons why the EU has so long fought a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the UK ’ s exit from the EU , one should keep in mind that the UK is the fifth-largest economy in the world .
With a population of 65 million , the UK represents around 13 percent of the EU ’ s population while its economy accounts for 18 percent of Europe ’ s GDP .
This makes the UK the second-largest economy of the EU .
To put this into perspective , the UK is as rich and powerful as the nineteen weakest economies in the EU combined .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ easy transition for the UK , it will not be without consequences for the EU .
The EU should feel the economic consequences of Brexit in three stages .
In the short term , there is the loss of the British contribution to the community budget .
As the contribution of member states to the EU budget is dependent on their GDP , it is understandable that behind Brexit there will be considerable financial consequences .
It was sometimes said that the negotiations , from the day after the initial Brexit vote and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to perpetuate the English contributions to the EU budget which should have otherwise been compensated mainly by Germany and France .
In the medium term , both parties need to redefine agreements to ensure the continuity of trade and business relationships .
Trade talks should continue until December 31 , 2020 , when it will be known whether the transition period has allowed the two sides to establish strong points of convergence .
Finally , in the longer term , the UK having freed itself from all European regulations , there is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ economic and social model competing with that advocated and imposed by the EU on its members .
The UK will be free to conclude trade agreements with new partners and could reach an advantageous agreement with an EU that can not do without either the British market or its army , whereas with the withdrawal of the British , the military expenditure of Europe is cut by 21 percent .
EU Destiny : From Fostering Collaboration to Empowering a New Form of Continental Statism In any case , the regulatory power of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Maastricht treaty of 1992 , the European Economic Community applied the principle of subsidiarity by confining itself to its areas of exclusive competence .
The exclusive powers of the union were the Customs Union ; the establishment of the competition rules necessary for the functioning of the internal market ; monetary policy for member states whose currency is the euro ; the conservation of marine biological resources within the framework of the common fisheries policy ; common commercial policy ; and the conclusion of international agreements .
In terms of barriers to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when it has put an end to customs barriers and to repeated devaluations which were a means for companies to avoid the need to make productivity gains .
European integration , as it took place up to and including the Single European Act of 1986 ( which preceded the 1992 treaty ) , has made European economies more modern and more competitive .
The EU in its current form is different in the sense that it has “ shared competences ” with the member states , “ competences to support , coordinate or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” and , finally , “ competences to take measures to ensure that member states coordinate their policies.
” To the Europe of free trade was added the Europe of standards , regulations , and lobbying .
There is no longer any principle of subsidiarity , and the EU can interfere in fields such as culture or social policies .
With the extension of its prerogatives , the EU has turned into a bureaucratic organization whose institutional bodies continuously centralize powers .
The EU pushes to reduce economic and societal disparities among @ @ @ @ @ @ @ relationships between some European countries and European institutions .
The UK often dissented within the EU and argued against EU policies while requesting exemptions .
During the debates at the EU parliament , one deputy claimed that the Brexit started when the EU granted exceptions and that it was this that impaired integration under a homogeneous regulatory scheme .
Far from questioning this quest for homogenization of the EU political and economic spaces , he asserted that the solution for avoiding such catastrophes was to ensure that no similar treatment would ever be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ many defenders of EU institutions , which are seen as guardians of “ continental stability.
” It is also argued that the EU is a powerful tool that constitutes a system of balances to protect individual rights against encroachment by member states .
For the proponents of minimum governance , it would be preferable to decrease the government power at the national level rather than adding a layer of institutions acting at the continental level .
The EU might look like a protective entity , but centralized structures are never politically neutral and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ abuses of power .
Over time they tend to distance themselves from the viewpoint of the citizens .
Technocrats working from within become convinced that they know better and that this justifies intrusions and interference in the business of others .
Although Brexit now appears to be a done deal , the EU bureaucracy may find ways to punish the UK for its independence .
Moreover , the EU may use the Brexit experience as a reason to further limit the freedom of member states so as to avoid any future exit by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sort of bait-and-switch for member states that were sold on membership as an opportunity to join a free trade bloc and a chance to participate in a more cooperative Europe .
The reality today is something much different .

The 2016 Brexit referendum was the culmination of a debate which had been ongoing for years.
While the Leave promoted rhetoric targeting the EU as an illegitimate and despotic entity threatening the freedom of all British citizens, the EU institutions together with politics and media supporting the Remain disregarded most of the concerns raised by the Leave to focus on the pieces which could be easily labeled as either xenophobic or anti-European. It was difficult to find any constructive conversation about the motivations of citizens supporting the leave option. Nevertheless, listening to what the Leave said shows that behind Brexit is a complex of interconnected issues about what the EU has become and what perspectives the EU proposes for the future.
But opposition to the EU has long been about the growing power of the EU bureaucracy over the member states and their populations. During his last speech in front of the EU parliament, UK deputy Nigel Farage summarized his viewpoint by reminding them that the UK had signed an agreement to facilitate business relationships, reciprocity, and exchanges of scientific and technical expertise, all of this to foster collaborations among Europeans. Mr. Farage pointed out that the initial agreements never included the legal framework for the implementation of a bureaucracy made up of unelected technocrats interfering with affairs normally controlled by the states. He also reminded his audience what problems appear and worsen with bureaucracies designed so that a minority of individuals is granted power without accountability.
Brexit in a Nutshell: What Is (Really) at Stake
The EU’s power rests in many ways on its revenue, and this is among the reasons why the EU has so long fought a British exit.
To understand the importance of the UK’s exit from the EU, one should keep in mind that the UK is the fifth-largest economy in the world. With a population of 65 million, the UK represents around 13 percent of the EU’s population while its economy accounts for 18 percent of Europe’s GDP. This makes the UK the second-largest economy of the EU. To put this into perspective, the UK is as rich and powerful as the nineteen weakest economies in the EU combined. This shows that although Brexit is not an easy transition for the UK, it will not be without consequences for the EU.
The EU should feel the economic consequences of Brexit in three stages. In the short term, there is the loss of the British contribution to the community budget. As the contribution of member states to the EU budget is dependent on their GDP, it is understandable that behind Brexit there will be considerable financial consequences. It was sometimes said that the negotiations, from the day after the initial Brexit vote and through their interminable duration, only served to perpetuate the English contributions to the EU budget which should have otherwise been compensated mainly by Germany and France. In the medium term, both parties need to redefine agreements to ensure the continuity of trade and business relationships. Trade talks should continue until December 31, 2020, when it will be known whether the transition period has allowed the two sides to establish strong points of convergence. Finally, in the longer term, the UK having freed itself from all European regulations, there is a good chance of seeing there develop an economic and social model competing with that advocated and imposed by the EU on its members. The UK will be free to conclude trade agreements with new partners and could reach an advantageous agreement with an EU that cannot do without either the British market or its army, whereas with the withdrawal of the British, the military expenditure of Europe is cut by 21 percent.
EU Destiny: From Fostering Collaboration to Empowering a New Form of Continental Statism
In any case, the regulatory power of the EU has grown over time.
Until the Maastricht treaty of 1992, the European Economic Community applied the principle of subsidiarity by confining itself to its areas of exclusive competence. The exclusive powers of the union were the Customs Union; the establishment of the competition rules necessary for the functioning of the internal market; monetary policy for member states whose currency is the euro; the conservation of marine biological resources within the framework of the common fisheries policy; common commercial policy; and the conclusion of international agreements. In terms of barriers to trade, the EU has been beneficial when it has put an end to customs barriers and to repeated devaluations which were a means for companies to avoid the need to make productivity gains. European integration, as it took place up to and including the Single European Act of 1986 (which preceded the 1992 treaty), has made European economies more modern and more competitive.
The EU in its current form is different in the sense that it has “shared competences” with the member states, “competences to support, coordinate or supplement the action of the Member States,” and, finally, “competences to take measures to ensure that member states coordinate their policies.” To the Europe of free trade was added the Europe of standards, regulations, and lobbying. There is no longer any principle of subsidiarity, and the EU can interfere in fields such as culture or social policies. With the extension of its prerogatives, the EU has turned into a bureaucratic organization whose institutional bodies continuously centralize powers. The EU pushes to reduce economic and societal disparities among its members, and this induces conflicting relationships between some European countries and European institutions. The UK often dissented within the EU and argued against EU policies while requesting exemptions. During the debates at the EU parliament, one deputy claimed that the Brexit started when the EU granted exceptions and that it was this that impaired integration under a homogeneous regulatory scheme. Far from questioning this quest for homogenization of the EU political and economic spaces, he asserted that the solution for avoiding such catastrophes was to ensure that no similar treatment would ever be granted in the future.
There remain many defenders of EU institutions, which are seen as guardians of “continental stability.” It is also argued that the EU is a powerful tool that constitutes a system of balances to protect individual rights against encroachment by member states. For the proponents of minimum governance, it would be preferable to decrease the government power at the national level rather than adding a layer of institutions acting at the continental level. The EU might look like a protective entity, but centralized structures are never politically neutral and are not exempt from regulatory overreach or abuses of power. Over time they tend to distance themselves from the viewpoint of the citizens. Technocrats working from within become convinced that they know better and that this justifies intrusions and interference in the business of others.
Although Brexit now appears to be a done deal, the EU bureaucracy may find ways to punish the UK for its independence. Moreover, the EU may use the Brexit experience as a reason to further limit the freedom of member states so as to avoid any future exit by other member states. This represents a sort of bait-and-switch for member states that were sold on membership as an opportunity to join a free trade bloc and a chance to participate in a more cooperative Europe. The reality today is something much different.


newswars--2020-07-09--Evolution of Language Means Future Human Colonies Likely Won’t Be Able to Understand Each Other, Stu

Evolution of Language Means Future Human Colonies Likely Won’t Be Able to Understand Each Other, Study Finds

Humanity is forever gazing toward the stars , with both dreams and plans of colonizing other worlds on the horizon .
However , even if we do eventually manage to settle on other planets , we might not be able to understand each other .
In order to reach the stars , we will likely require generational ships and , as the name suggests , these ships would be home to many , many generations of future humans ( and plants and animals ) .
These ‘ ark ’ ships are not merely confined to the realm of science fiction @ @ @ @ @ @ @ scientific studies and proposals .
However , such extraordinarily ambitious plans necessarily include numerous unforeseen developments – for one , genetic and biological mutations that we can ’ t really predict ahead of time .
In combination with these biological and physical mutations , language itself would also mutate given the extreme time frame involved , according to a recent study .
The researchers argue that interstellar travel and the eventual colonization of other planets would likely render humans even less intelligible to each other than they already are .
Take Google as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in 1997 and , in the intervening 23 years , has now become a somewhat ubiquitous verb thoroughly embedded in the vernacular , meaning “ to search the internet for information.
” Twitter launched in July 2006 and has now become a tool of public discourse , drawing in many world leaders .
Explaining the full significance of “ tweeting ” to someone back in 2000 might prove difficult , though not impossible .
Now imagine explaining that concept – the idea that many people could communicate a message to pretty much the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – to the average person in the 1950s , and the sheer volume of missing vocabulary required for that explanation .
These are the kinds of sweeping cultural and linguistic changes that can occur within the space of one modern generation .
Entire civilizations throughout human history rose and fell within the space of just a few generations .
Now extend that out 4.25 light years ( roughly 25 trillion miles ) to our nearest star system .
By some calculations , with current propulsion technology at least , that journey might take @ @ @ @ @ @ @ many believe humanity invented farming in the Fertile Crescent some 12,000 years ago ( though evidence exists of agriculture developing 23,000 years ago ) .
“ If you ’ re on this vessel for 10 generations , new concepts will emerge , new social issues will come up , and people will create ways of talking about them , and these will become the vocabulary particular to the ship .
People on Earth might never know about these words , unless there ’ s a reason to tell them , ” lead researcher @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the further away you get , the less you ’ re going to talk to people back home .
Generations pass , and there ’ s no one really back home to talk to .
And there ’ s not much you want to tell them , because they ’ ll only find out years later , and then you ’ ll hear back from them years after that.
” Using a language evolution simulator ( and an English-IPA translator ) , we can get a rough idea of how language might evolve @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ Hello friend , good to meet you .
Take me to your leader , please , ” becomes , “ Helluhuh fret , goot tu ’ uh be ’ yat yu .
Took be ’ ye to ’ o u ’ ul ley ’ eru , pley ’ yaz.
” If we define a generation as roughly 30 years , then the 137,000-year journey to the stars would comprise some 4,566 generations .
“ So they may well be communicating like we ’ d be using Latin – communicating with this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” said McKenzie .
The scientists ’ findings were published in Acta Futura , the journal of the European Space Agency ’ s Advanced Concepts Team .

Humanity is forever gazing toward the stars, with both dreams and plans of colonizing other worlds on the horizon. However, even if we do eventually manage to settle on other planets, we might not be able to understand each other.
In order to reach the stars, we will likely require generational ships and, as the name suggests, these ships would be home to many, many generations of future humans (and plants and animals).
These ‘ark’ ships are not merely confined to the realm of science fiction, but a genuine consideration for many scientific studies and proposals. However, such extraordinarily ambitious plans necessarily include numerous unforeseen developments – for one, genetic and biological mutations that we can’t really predict ahead of time.
In combination with these biological and physical mutations, language itself would also mutate given the extreme time frame involved, according to a recent study. The researchers argue that interstellar travel and the eventual colonization of other planets would likely render humans even less intelligible to each other than they already are.
Take Google as an example; the search engine launched in 1997 and, in the intervening 23 years, has now become a somewhat ubiquitous verb thoroughly embedded in the vernacular, meaning “to search the internet for information.”
Twitter launched in July 2006 and has now become a tool of public discourse, drawing in many world leaders. Explaining the full significance of “tweeting” to someone back in 2000 might prove difficult, though not impossible.
Now imagine explaining that concept – the idea that many people could communicate a message to pretty much the entire world instantaneously from a handheld device – to the average person in the 1950s, and the sheer volume of missing vocabulary required for that explanation.
These are the kinds of sweeping cultural and linguistic changes that can occur within the space of one modern generation. Entire civilizations throughout human history rose and fell within the space of just a few generations.
Now extend that out 4.25 light years (roughly 25 trillion miles) to our nearest star system. By some calculations, with current propulsion technology at least, that journey might take around 137,000 years. For reference, many believe humanity invented farming in the Fertile Crescent some 12,000 years ago (though evidence exists of agriculture developing 23,000 years ago).
“If you’re on this vessel for 10 generations, new concepts will emerge, new social issues will come up, and people will create ways of talking about them, and these will become the vocabulary particular to the ship. People on Earth might never know about these words, unless there’s a reason to tell them,” lead researcher Professor Andrew McKenzie explained.
“And the further away you get, the less you’re going to talk to people back home. Generations pass, and there’s no one really back home to talk to. And there’s not much you want to tell them, because they’ll only find out years later, and then you’ll hear back from them years after that.”
Using a language evolution simulator (and an English-IPA translator), we can get a rough idea of how language might evolve in a matter of just 20 generations.
“Hello friend, good to meet you. Take me to your leader, please,” becomes, “Helluhuh fret, goot tu’uh be’yat yu. Took be’ye to’o u’ul ley’eru, pley’yaz.”
If we define a generation as roughly 30 years, then the 137,000-year journey to the stars would comprise some 4,566 generations.
“So they may well be communicating like we’d be using Latin – communicating with this version of the language nobody uses,” said McKenzie.
The scientists’ findings were published in Acta Futura, the journal of the European Space Agency’s Advanced Concepts Team.
The response to Covid-19 mirrors Communist Chinese brainwashing torture techniques.


newswars--2020-07-09--How the Left Uses “Public Health Crises” to Get What It Wants

After insisting for weeks that leaving one ’ s home or gathering in groups of any size was “ irresponsible ” and a “ slap in the face ” to medical professionals , doctors and nurses completely changed their minds .
The prohibitionist view toward gatherings was specifically applied to those who protested the stay-at-home orders .
“ Shame on you !
” was the general attitude of many medical professionals who opposed the protests .
“ How dare you not follow the edicts of science !
” But , when protests and riots broke out in the wake of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Minneapolis police officers , many doctors , nurses , pundits , and activists completely changed their tune .
These protests , the doctors and nurses assured us , were perfectly fine .
The inconsistency in this position was obvious , of course .
There clearly was no scientific difference between a gathering designed for protesting forced business closures and a protest against racism .
Many suspected ( with good reason ) that the only relevant difference between the two was that the antiracism protests happened to line up with the left-wing views of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Suddenly , the dour moralizing and finger wagging of the nurses was gone , replaced by enthusiasm for public gatherings .
But then the supporters of the new protests figured out a way to slap a patina of science on the obviously political nature and incoherence of the views expressed by groups like “ Healthcare Workers for Justice “ : let ’ s call racism a public health crisis .
The phrase immediately became common currency among pundits and mainstream media sources .
The idea that racism is not just a bad thing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thus put the George Floyd protests on equal footing with stay-at-home orders as a necessary thing designed to combat a grave threat to public health .
Countless headlines sprang up declaring “ systemic racism is a public health issue ” and that just as we need masks to protect ourselves from COVID-19 , so we need mass gatherings and protests to protect us from racism .
There ’ s nothing new about this strategy , though .
Declaring a wide variety of social ills to be a “ public health crisis ” is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ profile of a specific policy issue .
Thus , poverty , pornography , inequality , inadequate housing , road traffic deaths , and capitalism have all been declared to be public health crises .
“ Public health crisis ” is essentially a left-wing stock phrase at this point , as is reflected by the fact that the solutions proffered to the social ills in question are virtually always some sort of government regulation or income redistribution scheme forced upon the nation ’ s population .
Perhaps the most robust example of this can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ gun violence ” is a public health crisis .
It is now common to find research on homicides and suicides with firearms in academic journals devoted to epidemiology and public health .
On an article in the International Journal of Epidemiology titled “ The Role of Epidemiology in Firearm Violence Prevention , ” the authors conclude , “ Firearm violence has reached pandemic levels ” and is a “ social disease.
” The prescribed solution can be easily predicted by anyone familiar with these types of articles .
The authors ’ demand @ @ @ @ @ @ @ create , scale up and evaluate interventions designed to address social and behavioural factors associated with firearm violence .
We call on governments , community leaders and community members to take meaningful action to support public health in addressing the problem of firearm violence .
These interventions , of course , are all assumed to be more government prohibitions and regulations punishable by fines and jail time .
In another case , researchers in the Annual Review of Public Health focus on suicides committed by firearm .
But instead of taking issue with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suicide , the pat and easy answer is simply more firearms prohibition , with the assumption that there can be no downside to this at all .
Also ignored is the fact that the data doesn ’ t support the notion that suicides decline in the absence of firearms .
Not surprisingly , we find that these researchers often have little to no expertise in criminal justice or the actual history of homicides and gun usage .
By labeling crime and gun usage to be a matter of “ public health , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of being medical doctors , “ experts ” in the field .
Peter Klein has noted how this attitude plays out : A few years ago an economist colleague of mine debated a professor from our university ’ s school of public health on gun violence and gun control .
My colleague walked through the empirical evidence on the effects of gun control laws on crime , accidental injury , and other social ills , citing well-known studies by economists and legal scholars…The public health professor — an MD who also teaches in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ entirely , instead telling emotional stories about ER patients he ’ d treated for gunshot wounds and how everything must be done to stop this “ epidemic ” of gun violence .
It is only natural , of course , for scholars of public health to automatically assume that coercive state measures are the solution to nearly every problem .
This is how public health officials and scholars think .
Moreover , over the past century the field of public health has expanded to cover nearly every field of public policy as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ re talking about urban planning , crime , highway design , or climate change , bureaucrats and academics—there ’ s really no difference between the two—in the field of public health have an easy “ solution ” for you .
Chances are it involves a new set of laws and government regulations .
Once upon a time , public health was much more limited in its scope .
“ Public health ” once implied that infectious diseases were involved in some way .
This was notable , for example , in public health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ quickly in the dirty and overcrowded urban tenements of the early twentieth century .
In many cases , because of the weakness of state institutions , public health officials relied on education and voluntary adoption of better health practices .
This is rarely the practice anymore .
In an age of supercharged state institutions , public health is far more characterized by laws , regulations , coercion , punishment , and mandatory “ compliance.
” The very use of the phrase “ public health crisis ” is designed to justify these measures .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ threat to public health , we must surely all agree it is of the utmost importance .
The Left has mastered the use of this phrase as a political ploy .
“ Public health , ” after all is just a matter of scientific objectivity , and those who disagree are “ anti-science.
” It ’ s a very effective ruse .
It remains to be seen how long people will fall for it .

After insisting for weeks that leaving one’s home or gathering in groups of any size was “irresponsible” and a “slap in the face” to medical professionals, doctors and nurses completely changed their minds.
The prohibitionist view toward gatherings was specifically applied to those who protested the stay-at-home orders. “Shame on you!” was the general attitude of many medical professionals who opposed the protests. “How dare you not follow the edicts of science!” But, when protests and riots broke out in the wake of George Floyd’s apparent murder by Minneapolis police officers, many doctors, nurses, pundits, and activists completely changed their tune. These protests, the doctors and nurses assured us, were perfectly fine.
The inconsistency in this position was obvious, of course. There clearly was no scientific difference between a gathering designed for protesting forced business closures and a protest against racism. Many suspected (with good reason) that the only relevant difference between the two was that the antiracism protests happened to line up with the left-wing views of the doctors and nurses in question. Suddenly, the dour moralizing and finger wagging of the nurses was gone, replaced by enthusiasm for public gatherings.
But then the supporters of the new protests figured out a way to slap a patina of science on the obviously political nature and incoherence of the views expressed by groups like “Healthcare Workers for Justice“: let’s call racism a public health crisis.
The phrase immediately became common currency among pundits and mainstream media sources. The idea that racism is not just a bad thing but a “public health crisis” thus put the George Floyd protests on equal footing with stay-at-home orders as a necessary thing designed to combat a grave threat to public health. Countless headlines sprang up declaring “systemic racism is a public health issue” and that just as we need masks to protect ourselves from COVID-19, so we need mass gatherings and protests to protect us from racism.
There’s nothing new about this strategy, though. Declaring a wide variety of social ills to be a “public health crisis” is a timeworn tactic used to raise the profile of a specific policy issue. Thus, poverty, pornography, inequality, inadequate housing, road traffic deaths, and capitalism have all been declared to be public health crises.
“Public health crisis” is essentially a left-wing stock phrase at this point, as is reflected by the fact that the solutions proffered to the social ills in question are virtually always some sort of government regulation or income redistribution scheme forced upon the nation’s population.
“Gun Violence” Is a “Social Disease”
Perhaps the most robust example of this can be found in the literature of how “gun violence” is a public health crisis. It is now common to find research on homicides and suicides with firearms in academic journals devoted to epidemiology and public health.
On an article in the International Journal of Epidemiology titled “The Role of Epidemiology in Firearm Violence Prevention,” the authors conclude, “Firearm violence has reached pandemic levels” and is a “social disease.” The prescribed solution can be easily predicted by anyone familiar with these types of articles. The authors’ demand:
[P]ublic health can create, scale up and evaluate interventions designed to address social and behavioural factors associated with firearm violence. We call on governments, community leaders and community members to take meaningful action to support public health in addressing the problem of firearm violence.
These interventions, of course, are all assumed to be more government prohibitions and regulations punishable by fines and jail time.
In another case, researchers in the Annual Review of Public Health focus on suicides committed by firearm. But instead of taking issue with the mental health problems that lead to suicide, the pat and easy answer is simply more firearms prohibition, with the assumption that there can be no downside to this at all. Also ignored is the fact that the data doesn’t support the notion that suicides decline in the absence of firearms.
Not surprisingly, we find that these researchers often have little to no expertise in criminal justice or the actual history of homicides and gun usage. By labeling crime and gun usage to be a matter of “public health,” they have designated themselves, by virtue of being medical doctors, “experts” in the field. Peter Klein has noted how this attitude plays out:
A few years ago an economist colleague of mine debated a professor from our university’s school of public health on gun violence and gun control. My colleague walked through the empirical evidence on the effects of gun control laws on crime, accidental injury, and other social ills, citing well-known studies by economists and legal scholars…The public health professor — an MD who also teaches in the medical school — ignored these issues entirely, instead telling emotional stories about ER patients he’d treated for gunshot wounds and how everything must be done to stop this “epidemic” of gun violence.
It is only natural, of course, for scholars of public health to automatically assume that coercive state measures are the solution to nearly every problem. This is how public health officials and scholars think. Moreover, over the past century the field of public health has expanded to cover nearly every field of public policy as a public health concern. Whether we’re talking about urban planning, crime, highway design, or climate change, bureaucrats and academics—there’s really no difference between the two—in the field of public health have an easy “solution” for you. Chances are it involves a new set of laws and government regulations.
Once upon a time, public health was much more limited in its scope. “Public health” once implied that infectious diseases were involved in some way. This was notable, for example, in public health crusades against tuberculosis, which often spread quickly in the dirty and overcrowded urban tenements of the early twentieth century. In many cases, because of the weakness of state institutions, public health officials relied on education and voluntary adoption of better health practices.
This is rarely the practice anymore. In an age of supercharged state institutions, public health is far more characterized by laws, regulations, coercion, punishment, and mandatory “compliance.” The very use of the phrase “public health crisis” is designed to justify these measures. After all, if something is a threat to public health, we must surely all agree it is of the utmost importance. The Left has mastered the use of this phrase as a political ploy. “Public health,” after all is just a matter of scientific objectivity, and those who disagree are “anti-science.”
It’s a very effective ruse. It remains to be seen how long people will fall for it.


newswars--2020-07-09--Biden Goes All Trump-Like With $700bn ‘Buy American’ Pledge But Provides Few Specifics

Presumptive Democratic candidate Joe Biden has started to outline his economic proposals for his upcoming presidential bid .
To some , his blueprints may sound a bit like those of his Republican rival back in 2016 .
Former Vice President and presumptive Democratic candidate Joe Biden has revealed his economic proposals should he win the White House this November .
Biden ’ s plan call for a $ 700 billion investment in ‘ Buy American ’ and ‘ Innovate in America ’ initiatives , according to his campaign ’ s website and senior adviser Jake Sullivan ’ s comments to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ discussed in detail during Biden ’ s address at a metal works in Dunmore , Pennsylvania this Thursday .
The outline of manufacture- and jobs-targeting proposals suggests that a $ 400bn government procurement investment should be allocated for the purchase of US goods and services while $ 300bn would be invested in research and development , including on 5G technologies and artificial intelligence .
According to the AP report , Biden has not yet identified how the proposed short-term initiatives will be financed .
For some , Biden ’ s message and his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s 2016 “ Make America Great Again ” campaign slogan and his emphasis on employment in American manufacturing .
But Biden aides have denied this , according to AP , arguing that the Democratic candidate ’ s appeal is more “ coherent ” than Trump ’ s .
The two do indeed have some differences in their economic visions , especially concerning corporate tax cuts , which were proposed by Trump back in 2016 and subsequently backed by the Republican party .
These have been criticised by Biden as encouraging “ offshoring @ @ @ @ @ @ @ economic plan does suggest that the former vice president is currently focussed on winning back the working-class electorate lost by the Hillary Clinton and the Democrats in 2016 .
Indeed there are seemingly strong similarities between Trump ’ s past and Biden ’ s current proposals : • ‘ Made in All of America ’ : Biden ’ s slogan “ Made in All of America ” by “ all of America ’ s workers ” may cause some flashbacks to 2016 .
In particular , his campaign proposes bolstering the US government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ content laws ” over “ made in America ” products .
Donald Trump might not have been that specific , but then he was primarily running on a platform of boosting America ’ s competitiveness in relation to other states , especially China .
• Manufacturing sector : “ He does not buy for one second that the vitality of US manufacturing is a thing of the past ” , Joe Biden ’ s campaign website reads , suggesting that the presumptive candidate will try to make “ smart investments ” to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This chimes with Trump ’ s 2016 campaign pledges and it is the manufacturing sector that has firmly been the president ’ s focus since taking office .
• Jobs Creation : Most presidential candidates promise to create new jobs , but Biden goes as far as to promise “ at least 5 million ” new ones through manufacturing and innovation .
Trump also promised to create new jobs back in 2016 , especially in energy-related sectors , and he achieved this .
If it were not for the coronavirus pandemic , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ low unemployment numbers among American workers , and a thriving manufacturing sector .
For Joe Biden , it is time to “ bring jobs back ” – a formula which resembles Donald Trump ’ s pledge in relation to outsourcing manufacturing to states like China and Mexico .
• Trade strategy with China : “ Take aggressive trade enforcement actions against China or any other country seeking to undercut American manufacturing through unfair practices , including currency manipulation , anti-competitive dumping , state-owned company abuses , or unfair subsidies ” .
No , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that back in 2016 but rather Joe Biden himself in his recent manifesto .
Trump has repeatedly attacked China , promising to fight Beijing ’ s “ unfair ” trade practices and make America a force to be reckoned with .
Biden ’ s economic plan , which calls for a tighter control over any trade deals , appears to be based on similar logic .
The upcoming address in Dunmore will be the first opportunity for many to hear Joe Biden ’ s economic vision , as much of his focus in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and his Democratic rivals .

Presumptive Democratic candidate Joe Biden has started to outline his economic proposals for his upcoming presidential bid. To some, his blueprints may sound a bit like those of his Republican rival back in 2016.
Former Vice President and presumptive Democratic candidate Joe Biden has revealed his economic proposals should he win the White House this November.
Biden’s plan call for a $700 billion investment in ‘Buy American’ and ‘Innovate in America’ initiatives, according to his campaign’s website and senior adviser Jake Sullivan’s comments to AP. The plan will reportedly be discussed in detail during Biden’s address at a metal works in Dunmore, Pennsylvania this Thursday.
The outline of manufacture- and jobs-targeting proposals suggests that a $400bn government procurement investment should be allocated for the purchase of US goods and services while $300bn would be invested in research and development, including on 5G technologies and artificial intelligence. According to the AP report, Biden has not yet identified how the proposed short-term initiatives will be financed.
For some, Biden’s message and his rhetoric bear some similarities to Donald Trump’s 2016 “Make America Great Again” campaign slogan and his emphasis on employment in American manufacturing. But Biden aides have denied this, according to AP, arguing that the Democratic candidate’s appeal is more “coherent” than Trump’s.
The two do indeed have some differences in their economic visions, especially concerning corporate tax cuts, which were proposed by Trump back in 2016 and subsequently backed by the Republican party. These have been criticised by Biden as encouraging “offshoring” practices.
But Biden’s economic plan does suggest that the former vice president is currently focussed on winning back the working-class electorate lost by the Hillary Clinton and the Democrats in 2016. Indeed there are seemingly strong similarities between Trump’s past and Biden’s current proposals:
‘Made in All of America’: Biden’s slogan “Made in All of America” by “all of America’s workers” may cause some flashbacks to 2016. In particular, his campaign proposes bolstering the US government’s regulatory power by tightening existing “content laws” over “made in America” products. Donald Trump might not have been that specific, but then he was primarily running on a platform of boosting America’s competitiveness in relation to other states, especially China.
Biden’s slogan “Made in All of America” by “all of America’s workers” may cause some flashbacks to 2016. In particular, his campaign proposes bolstering the US government’s regulatory power by tightening existing “content laws” over “made in America” products. Donald Trump might not have been that specific, but then he was primarily running on a platform of boosting America’s competitiveness in relation to other states, especially China. Manufacturing sector: “He does not buy for one second that the vitality of US manufacturing is a thing of the past”, Joe Biden’s campaign website reads, suggesting that the presumptive candidate will try to make “smart investments” to move some production to the Unites States. This chimes with Trump’s 2016 campaign pledges and it is the manufacturing sector that has firmly been the president’s focus since taking office.
“He does not buy for one second that the vitality of US manufacturing is a thing of the past”, Joe Biden’s campaign website reads, suggesting that the presumptive candidate will try to make “smart investments” to move some production to the Unites States. This chimes with Trump’s 2016 campaign pledges and it is the manufacturing sector that has firmly been the president’s focus since taking office. Jobs Creation: Most presidential candidates promise to create new jobs, but Biden goes as far as to promise “at least 5 million” new ones through manufacturing and innovation. Trump also promised to create new jobs back in 2016, especially in energy-related sectors, and he achieved this. If it were not for the coronavirus pandemic, he might still be bragging about record low unemployment numbers among American workers, and a thriving manufacturing sector. For Joe Biden, it is time to “bring jobs back” – a formula which resembles Donald Trump’s pledge in relation to outsourcing manufacturing to states like China and Mexico.
Most presidential candidates promise to create new jobs, but Biden goes as far as to promise “at least 5 million” new ones through manufacturing and innovation. Trump also promised to create new jobs back in 2016, especially in energy-related sectors, and he achieved this. If it were not for the coronavirus pandemic, he might still be bragging about record low unemployment numbers among American workers, and a thriving manufacturing sector. For Joe Biden, it is time to “bring jobs back” – a formula which resembles Donald Trump’s pledge in relation to outsourcing manufacturing to states like China and Mexico. Trade strategy with China: “Take aggressive trade enforcement actions against China or any other country seeking to undercut American manufacturing through unfair practices, including currency manipulation, anti-competitive dumping, state-owned company abuses, or unfair subsidies”. No, it was not Donald Trump who said that back in 2016 but rather Joe Biden himself in his recent manifesto. Trump has repeatedly attacked China, promising to fight Beijing’s “unfair” trade practices and make America a force to be reckoned with. Biden’s economic plan, which calls for a tighter control over any trade deals, appears to be based on similar logic.
The upcoming address in Dunmore will be the first opportunity for many to hear Joe Biden’s economic vision, as much of his focus in recent months has been on attacking Trump and his Democratic rivals.


newswars--2020-07-09--New Joe Biden Campaign Ad Shocks The World

Watch as Joe Biden and company put their heads together to overthrow America .
The Biden campaign has finally provided @ @ @ @ @ the American people .

Watch as Joe Biden and company put their heads together to overthrow America.
The Biden campaign has finally provided a truthful campaign ad to the American people.


newswars--2020-07-09--College Threatens to Revoke Student’s Admission After Viral Pro-Trump TikTok Video

A college in Wisconsin threatened to revoke a student ’ s admission after she posted a pro-Trump video on TikTok .
The video featured incoming Marquette University freshman Samantha Pfefferle dancing gleefully to 6ix9ine ’ s “ GOOBA ” in front of a “ Trump 2020 ” flag and a pro-Trump bumper sticker .
Captions in the video state : “ When people see that I support Trump… Then try to hate on me… And think I ’ ll change my views.
” A separate caption reads , “ When the libs find their way to your page , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , “ He ’ s mad , she ’ s mad , big sad , haha , don ’ t care , stay mad.
” Pfefferle says after posting the video seen over 600,000 times she began receiving hate messages , including one where a commenter said , “ I hope you get shot.
” ” I ’ d pray for you , but you ’ re not worth it , ” another commenter stated , The College Fix reports .
Pfefferle told the Fix she was “ extremely disappointed by the incendiary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ repulsive.
” A petition on Instagram also encouraged others to copy and paste a template and send it to the university urging them not to admit Pfefferle .
It reads : Ms. Pfefferle has been very vocal on social media ( TikTok , Instagram ) about how she is enthusiastic about coming to Marquette in the Fall .
As a Marquette student who is passionate for the University ’ s core values , such as Cura Personalis , and recognizing everyone ’ s human dignity , these transphobic , racist , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ These comments made by Ms. Pfefferle were shared publicly , and were clearly presented as mocking jokes .
Ms. Pfefferle is obviously proud of her statements , as she stands behind her words in every post .
These comments create and perpetuate an unsafe space for the LGBTQ+ community , first generation students , and Dreamers at Marquette .
Samantha Pfefferle is proud of her transphobic and xenophobic opinions , which under no circumstances should be allowed at Marquette .
The University can and should make it their priority to ensure students ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and POC ) feel safe , valued , and appreciated on campus .
Eventually , Pfefferle was contacted by the dean of Marquette University ’ s undergraduate admissions , who warned her she was not yet a student .
“ [ He ] had the heart to tell me I wasn ’ t a student , ” Pfefferle said , describing the interaction to the Fix .
“ This means that my classification is still in limbo and is currently being decided by the administration .
I have been accepted , I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ my roommates , I even have a complete class schedule .
If that doesn ’ t make me a student , what does ?
” Pfefferle says she was also quizzed on a number of things by other Marquette officials , including her views on “ Dreamers.
” “ They also asked me hypothetical questions regarding Dreamers , ” she said .
“ How would I respond if a Dreamer who lived down the hall from me came up to me and told me she didn ’ t feel safe or comfortable with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
They also asked me if they thought there was anything I could do to improve my image on campus .
They proceeded to ask if I was comfortable with the reputation I have established for myself .
The assistant dean asked if I put any thought into the response I would be getting from my videos.
” Pfefferle says on Monday the university reached out to let her know her admission was not being revoked .
Despite the harassment , Pfefferle says she ’ d still “ like to attend Marquette University @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the school should acknowledge the hateful comments she ’ s received .
“ …Because of the death threats , bullying , and harassment , this transition will be difficult to make , ” she said .
“ As of right now , I ’ m being left in the dark as to how Marquette is addressing the harassment.
” A petition at change.org calls on the college not to bar her from admissions .

A college in Wisconsin threatened to revoke a student’s admission after she posted a pro-Trump video on TikTok.
The video featured incoming Marquette University freshman Samantha Pfefferle dancing gleefully to 6ix9ine’s “GOOBA” in front of a “Trump 2020” flag and a pro-Trump bumper sticker.
Captions in the video state: “When people see that I support Trump… Then try to hate on me… And think I’ll change my views.”
A separate caption reads, “When the libs find their way to your page,” while the song’s lyrics say, “He’s mad, she’s mad, big sad, haha, don’t care, stay mad.”
Pfefferle says after posting the video seen over 600,000 times she began receiving hate messages, including one where a commenter said, “I hope you get shot.”
”I’d pray for you, but you’re not worth it,” another commenter stated, The College Fix reports.
Pfefferle told the Fix she was “extremely disappointed by the incendiary comments,” and deemed the reaction “repulsive.”
A petition on Instagram also encouraged others to copy and paste a template and send it to the university urging them not to admit Pfefferle. It reads:
Ms. Pfefferle has been very vocal on social media (TikTok, Instagram) about how she is enthusiastic about coming to Marquette in the Fall. As a Marquette student who is passionate for the University’s core values, such as Cura Personalis, and recognizing everyone’s human dignity, these transphobic, racist, and xenophobic comments should not be tolerated. These comments made by Ms. Pfefferle were shared publicly, and were clearly presented as mocking jokes. Ms. Pfefferle is obviously proud of her statements, as she stands behind her words in every post. These comments create and perpetuate an unsafe space for the LGBTQ+ community, first generation students, and Dreamers at Marquette. Samantha Pfefferle is proud of her transphobic and xenophobic opinions, which under no circumstances should be allowed at Marquette. The University can and should make it their priority to ensure students (specifically LGBTQ+, immigrants, first gen, and POC) feel safe, valued, and appreciated on campus.
Eventually, Pfefferle was contacted by the dean of Marquette University’s undergraduate admissions, who warned her she was not yet a student.
“[He] had the heart to tell me I wasn’t a student,” Pfefferle said, describing the interaction to the Fix. “This means that my classification is still in limbo and is currently being decided by the administration. I have been accepted, I paid for my housing, I have my roommates, I even have a complete class schedule. If that doesn’t make me a student, what does?”
Pfefferle says she was also quizzed on a number of things by other Marquette officials, including her views on “Dreamers.”
“They also asked me hypothetical questions regarding Dreamers,” she said. “How would I respond if a Dreamer who lived down the hall from me came up to me and told me she didn’t feel safe or comfortable with my views and me being on campus. They also asked me if they thought there was anything I could do to improve my image on campus. They proceeded to ask if I was comfortable with the reputation I have established for myself. The assistant dean asked if I put any thought into the response I would be getting from my videos.”
Pfefferle says on Monday the university reached out to let her know her admission was not being revoked.
Despite the harassment, Pfefferle says she’d still “like to attend Marquette University” in the fall, but noted the school should acknowledge the hateful comments she’s received.
“…Because of the death threats, bullying, and harassment, this transition will be difficult to make,” she said. “As of right now, I’m being left in the dark as to how Marquette is addressing the harassment.”
A petition at change.org calls on the college not to bar her from admissions.
Follow the author on Gab: https://gab.ai/adansalazar
On Twitter: Follow @AdanSalazarWins
On Parler: https://parler.com/profile/adansalazar/
On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/adan.salazar.735
On Minds: https://www.minds.com/adan_infowars


newswars--2020-07-09--Spain’s Catalonia Region Imposes Mandatory Masks in Public at All Times

An order making face masks fully mandatory in public went into force in Spain ’ s northeastern region of Catalonia on Thursday , with those violating the regulation facing fines of €100 ( $ 113 ) .
The order was announced on Wednesday , four days after more than 200,000 people in the Segria area were placed under lockdown following a number of coronavirus outbreaks there .
Masks are mandatory across all of Spain in shared indoor spaces and outdoors as well when 1.5 meters ( 5 feet ) of physical distance can not be maintained , but Catalonia is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of masks compulsory in all situations regardless of distance .
Shortly afterward , the Basque town of Ordizia also imposed a similar regulation after a cluster of nearly 50 cases was discovered there .
Catalonia , which has a population of 7.5 million , has seen the biggest increase in confirmed new cases of any region in Spain since a nationwide lockdown was lifted in mid-June .
Health authorities in the region have warned that hospitals are filling up and could soon be overwhelmed .
Officials said the tighter measures were aimed at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of face masks by some citizens .
Spain is one of the worst-hit European countries , with nearly 270,000 infections and more than 28,000 deaths .
After initial doubts on the part of some health authorities , the wearing of face masks in public is now considered an important measure in stemming the spread of the coronavirus , which has killed at least half a million people worldwide .
Alex Jones breaks down the left ’ s obsession with starting the second civil war .

An order making face masks fully mandatory in public went into force in Spain’s northeastern region of Catalonia on Thursday, with those violating the regulation facing fines of €100 ($113).
The order was announced on Wednesday, four days after more than 200,000 people in the Segria area were placed under lockdown following a number of coronavirus outbreaks there.
Masks are mandatory across all of Spain in shared indoor spaces and outdoors as well when 1.5 meters (5 feet) of physical distance cannot be maintained, but Catalonia is the first region to make the wearing of masks compulsory in all situations regardless of distance.
Shortly afterward, the Basque town of Ordizia also imposed a similar regulation after a cluster of nearly 50 cases was discovered there.
Decline in face mask use
Catalonia, which has a population of 7.5 million, has seen the biggest increase in confirmed new cases of any region in Spain since a nationwide lockdown was lifted in mid-June.
Health authorities in the region have warned that hospitals are filling up and could soon be overwhelmed.
Officials said the tighter measures were aimed at combating a noticeable decline in the use of face masks by some citizens.
Spain is one of the worst-hit European countries, with nearly 270,000 infections and more than 28,000 deaths.
After initial doubts on the part of some health authorities, the wearing of face masks in public is now considered an important measure in stemming the spread of the coronavirus, which has killed at least half a million people worldwide.
Alex Jones breaks down the left’s obsession with starting the second civil war.