newswars--2020-05-26--mRNA Vaccines Might Prove Catastrophic in a Rushed Coronavirus Response

mRNA vaccines — also called “ genetic vaccines ” — arise from an innovative biotechnology approach that turns the body ’ s cells into molecular factories to produce proteins that activate a pathogen-specific immune response .
The technology holds great promise but also presents significant risks which are not yet fully known .
Summary of what ’ s in this article : – mRNA vaccines promise an intriguing new platform for immunization that does not rely on the growth or harvesting of pathogens from animal tissue .
This offers mRNA vaccines several key advantages over traditional vaccines .
– Research @ @ @ @ @ @ @ infancy , even though various biotech pioneers have been working on ways to achieve mRNA vaccines for around two decades .
It is very likely that yet more decades of research will be required to achieve acceptable levels of safety and efficacy .
– mRNA vaccines can be produced far more rapidly , safely and uniformly than traditional vaccines .
Production can be easily scaled up , and there is zero risk of introducing “ live ” pathogens into the body of the patient , since these vaccines don ’ t use weakened @ @ @ @ @ @ @ There are very real risks associated with mRNA vaccines including “ enhanced ” inflammation and auto-immune reactions , where the body ’ s cells are inadvertently programmed to attack critical proteins required for normal health ( such as hormones ) .
– The profit-motivated rush to deploy mRNA vaccines to prevent the spread of the Wuhan coronavirus is causing regulators and researchers to skip ( or accelerate ) many critical steps in quality control and clinical trials .
This is likely to result in catastrophic consequences — unintended side effects — if such @ @ @ @ @ @ @ without proper long-term clinical trials .
– mRNA vaccines could be maliciously exploited to weaponize vaccines to target critical physiological functions in humans .
This is similar in effect to “ RNA interference ” technology which is a gene suppressing innovation that has been studied for use as an insect-killing pesticide technology in crops .
Although the mechanisms of mRNA vaccines and RNA interference technology are very different , they can achieve many of the same outcomes such as induced infertility or death in targeted organisms , which could include humans .
Technically @ @ @ @ @ @ @ target specific genetic subgroups of humans such as those of African descent .
– The best current application of mRNA vaccines seems to be found in personalized medicine cancer treatment applications , where “ vaccines ” are customized to teach the body ’ s immune system to attack and kill cancer cells .
– A reasonable tolerance risk for mRNA vaccine side effects would be proportional to the mortality risk of the pathogen or disease condition the vaccine is treating .
For example , if stage IV cancer kills 80 % of patients @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cures 50 % of patients while killing 5 % of patients , the lives-saved-to-patients-killed ratio is 10:1 , which would arguably be a reasonable risk to assume .
However , if an mRNA coronavirus vaccine is widely given to healthy individuals who are at very low risk of mortality to begin with , then if the mRNA vaccine kills 1 in 1,000 of those people ( for example ) , the vaccine might cause far higher mortality figures than the pathogen itself .
How mRNA vaccines work… hint : They ’ re not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ term “ vaccine ” is actually a misnomer .
The mRNA approach doesn ’ t infect the body with a weakened ( “ attenuated ” ) virus but rather commands the body ’ s cells to manufacture specific molecules that trick the immune system into thinking a pathogen is present .
In the context of vaccines , these molecules are called “ antigens , ” and when these antigens are produced inside the body ’ s cells and subsequently presented to the cell surface , the immune system , in ideal circumstances , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an active immune response to eliminate those antigens .
If the antigens are structured in a way that resembles the targeted viral pathogen — such as the Wuhan coronavirus — the body ’ s immune response should offer protection against the actual coronavirus .
With mRNA vaccines , what ’ s injected into the body isn ’ t a weakened virus or even selected antigens but rather protein coding instructions that tell your body ’ s cells how to make the antigens on their own .
( That process is called “ translation.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ like writing down and delivering to someone a set of instructions for building a catapult to protect the castle .
Instead of building catapults and delivering them to the castle , you ’ re telling the inhabitants inside the castle how to build their own catapults to fend off invaders .
Here ’ s a simplified diagram of this process from Curevac.com , one of the many companies pursuing mRNA vaccines against the coronavirus .
As Curevac explains on its website : With our mRNA technology , we instruct the human body to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that , we use the natural messenger substance mRNA that contains the construction manual needed to produce proteins .
We program this messenger substance with the information about one protein of the coronavirus and inject it into the human body .
The body recognizes the protein produced by our cells as something unknown and activates its immune cells to produce antibodies and T-cells against it .
In this way , we imitate the natural viral infection and activate the endogenous defense system .
In theory , mRNA vaccines offer extraordinary advantages over traditional @ @ @ @ @ @ @ manufacture and a lot faster to make .
They ’ re clean ( i.e .
they will not contain latent viruses found in the animals used to grow traditional vaccines ) and typically require no adjuvants or other toxic additives in order to work as intended .
Furthermore , they can direct the body to manufacture almost any protein imaginable .
That ’ s how it works in theory , of course .
But they also present enormous risks , and if the deployment of mRNA vaccines is rushed , the results could @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can be maliciously deployed to deliberately trick the human body into attacking its own critical functions such as fertility , neurological function , cell repair and other critical processes .
This is explained in more detail below .
The following video , from CureVac , is actually a fairly good overview of the mRNA platform and its promise .
Keep in mind this is a greatly simplified promotional video and it of course doesn ’ t really get into the potential risks or side effects : The big problem with mRNA vaccines is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the body ’ s synthesis of tens of thousands of different proteins is remarkably delicate and easy to throw out of balance .
Many people don ’ t realize this , but proteins are not merely structural components of the body ( such as muscle tissue ) , they are also messengers ( such as hormones ) , transport vehicles , enzymes , antibodies and many other types of molecules necessary for good health .
Injecting the body with mRNA strands — which are essentially protein synthesis instructions — could theoretically unleash @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which could include causing destructive self-reinforcing feedback loops that either diminish necessary protein synthesis or cause runaway excessive protein synthesis .
These side effects can potentially lead to at least five negative outcomes : 1 ) Sudden onset of autoimmune disorders that cause the body ’ s immune system to attack its own cells .
( See more details below . )
2 ) Heightened inflammation in the body , resulting in a hyper-inflammatory response in some people , leading to secondary effects such as neurological damage , organ failure or cancer .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ enhanced ” inflammatory response .
3 ) A heightened risk of blood clotting in response to mRNA strands circulating in the blood outside the body ’ s cells .
This can lead to potentially fatal episodes of stroke or serious cardiovascular events .
4 ) Immune response interference due to the presence of unintended RNA fragments being translated into unintended proteins , leading to a vast array of negative possible outcomes including molecular deficiencies that can result in various diseases and syndromes including hormonal / endocrine disorders , infertility , cardiovascular disease , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) In the case of self-replicating mRNA vaccines using viral components , an inability to stop a runaway process that ’ s replicating out of control in the body .
This could theoretically occur when the mRNA snippets are pushed into cells via virus replicon particles ( VRP ) , for example , or using other viral delivery methods that rely on viral replication machinery .
On the other hand , self-replicating mRNA vaccines allow for injection doses to be incredibly small , since the mRNA coding material is self-replicating , and this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ smaller dosing requirements compared to traditional vaccines .
In addition to these five major risks , there are also enormously important questions about mRNA vaccines and some of the problems they might encounter in the body : 1 ) What happens if the desired protein folding goes awry ?
Without proper folding , the proteins never achieve their desired functionality .
In the case of antigens , improper folding would render the structure useless and would not impart immunity .
The mRNA translation into a protein is only part of the process of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” of the protein is another big part .
Perhaps this has already been resolved by the very capable scientists working on this platform , but it ’ s a question that deserves further exploration .
2 ) How do the antigens produced inside the cell efficiently get transported to the outer membrane of the cell ?
This answer seems to be confidently answered by experts in this area , but it raises a second round of questions regarding cell membrane permeability which we already know is altered by electromagnetic exposure from sources @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Notably , mRNA vaccine researchers are well aware of the phenomenon known as “ electroporation , ” because it is used alongside “ gene gun ” approaches in an attempt to insert self-replicating RNA payloads into cells , as you can see mentioned in this study on mRNA vaccines .
3 ) What happens if the mRNA snippets get fragmented and only partial instructions are delivered to the ribosomes , resulting in translation of partial proteins ?
This could , in theory , cause the body to see these partial proteins as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those proteins might match critical molecules the body needs , such as hormones or enzymes .
The end result could be that the immune system gets activated against the body ’ s own necessary molecules or cells .
In other words , this is the autoimmune disorder scenario mentioned in the list above , and it opens up a Pandora ’ s Box of catastrophic consequences that might be impossible to anticipate .
4 ) How might mRNA vaccines be maliciously weaponized as a depopulation platform to achieve globalist goals of depopulation via @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the synthesis of any desired protein , it ’ s a simple matter to use the platform to build hormone-resembling antigens that would “ teach ” the human body to attack specific hormones necessary for reproduction and gestation .
This , in turn , would theoretically result in widespread female infertility , thereby achieving globalist depopulation goals through vaccine-induced “ autoimmune infertility.
” Manufacturers of mRNA vaccines no doubt say all these risks can be mitigated .
While that might be true after perhaps 40 years of research and trials , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ additional long-term research on this platform — perhaps 25 years more — not a rushed vaccine that skips animal trials and compresses many years of typical safety research into just a few months .
Importantly , many of the theoretical side effects of an mRNA vaccine would not become apparent until months or years after the initial injection .
These adverse events are likely to be systemic , not acute , and would not become apparent in short-term clinical trials .
This is a critical issue to grasp , since mRNA vaccines are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trials , leaving open the possibility of long-term unintended side effects that were not anticipated by vaccine manufacturers or FDA regulators .
– They don ’ t need to be grown in animal organs or chicken eggs , eliminating the risk of cross-species contamination of the vaccine .
– mRNA vaccine makers currently claim that their vaccines don ’ t require the use of inflammation-inducing adjuvants , which are widely known to be responsible for many of the toxic effects of present-day vaccines .
– Because the vaccine doesn ’ t consist of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ live ” pathogens accidentally being injected into the patient , contributing to further spread of infectious disease .
This has occurred numerous times with classic vaccines .
– mRNA vaccines are much easier and faster to produce than traditional vaccines .
Their manufacture is also easily standardized , with far greater purity and quality control potential than with vaccines which are made from animal tissue .
– The injection doses can be orders of magnitude smaller than for traditional vaccines .
– When mRNA vaccines are specifically programmed to target a patient @ @ @ @ @ @ @ customized mRNA “ vaccine ” can be incredibly effective at teaching the body to destroy cancer cells .
This is sometimes referred to as a “ cancer vaccine , ” although the label is misleading .
It ’ s actually a form of personalized medicine where the body is aided in the selective destruction of the very specific cancer cells which are replicating in that patient ’ s body .
More details about the possible risks of mRNA vaccines Here ’ s a summary of the current situation with mRNA vaccines , courtesy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ phg Foundation : There is still a lot of work to be done before mRNA vaccines can become standard treatments , in the meantime , we need a better understanding of their potential side effects , and more evidence of their long term efficacy .
In other words , mRNA vaccines hold very high long-term promise , but they are nowhere near being ready for large-scale commercial production and administration into billions of people , even though that seems to be the goal of the Moderna corporation and those pushing for a rapid @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Some of the known risks of mRNA vaccines include : – The possibility that mRNA fragments might , through some currently unknown process , enter the cell nucleus and alter the genome of the host .
mRNA vaccine companies currently claim this is impossible , but the history of medicine is full of examples of arrogant scientists making catastrophic assumptions about the human body that turned out to be overly optimistic .
– Because mRNA fragments code instructions for protein synthesis in the body , mRNA vaccines could be used to inject the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of other proteins that are intended to carry out a long list of nefarious ill effects in human hosts , including infertility .
This is crucial to note because the W.H.O .
approved vaccines administered to young women in Africa have already been found to be laced with HCG , an infertility chemical designed to help achieve global depopulation .
Given that many of the most noted vaccine proponents are also depopulation advocates , the exploitation of the mRNA platform to achieve infertility or accelerated deaths can not be discounted .
– Some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ self-amplifying ” — inject the body with “ viral replication machinery ” to force the body to keep replicating the encoded proteins for an extended period of time , making it impossible to stop the process once the injection has taken place .
– The immune response may be far larger than intended , as the body sees the introduced mRNA fragments as evidence that the body is under attack from a pathogen .
“ Unintended effects : the mRNA strand in the vaccine may elicit an unintended immune reaction , ” explains @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Cambridge ) .
And as Stephane Bancel , CEO of Moderna , said in a TEDxBeaconStreet conference in 2013 : mRNA creates an immune response .
Why ?
Because a virus is made of mRNA .
Like the flu .
So if we inject mRNA in a patient , what happens ?
Your body thinks you just got the flu .
And it ’ s not very good for our drug , because you know all the symptoms of the flu .
Not super nice… and the problem of going very high in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ body , you have a ton of side effects .
– There exists a very well known risk that mRNA material introduced into the body may produce autoimmune reactions , where the body ’ s cells are essentially programmed to attack other healthy cells .
From , “ mRNA vaccines — a new era in vaccinology , ” published in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery in 2018 , authored by Norbert Pardi and colleagues : …recent human trials have demonstrated moderate and in rare cases severe injection site or systemic reactions for different mRNA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ some mRNA-based vaccine platforms54,166 induce potent type I interferon responses , which have been associated not only with inflammation but also potentially with autoimmunity .
Another potential safety issue could derive from the presence of extracellular RNA during mRNA vaccination .
Extracellular naked RNA has been shown to increase the permeability of tightly packed endothelial cells and may thus contribute to oedema .
Another study showed that extracellular RNA promoted blood coagulation and pathological thrombus formation… In other words , having RNA floating around in the blood , outside the cells — which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ caused blood clotting , which also happens to be one of the deadly side effects of COVID-19 itself .
Autoimmune reactions have also been noted in the research .
mRNA vaccines are far easier and faster to produce than traditional vaccines… and they don ’ t use animals to grow diseased organs All this raises the question : If the purpose of mRNA vaccines is to program the body ’ s cells to manufacture antigens which are then recognized by the immune system , why not just inject the body with antigens in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to hijack the body ’ s protein synthesis machinery ?
As PublicHealth.org explains on its “ How vaccine work ” page , it seems clear that injecting antigens would be a more direct route to desired levels of immunity rather than injecting mRNA instructions that tell the body ’ s cells to produce the antigens : A vaccine works by training the immune system to recognize and combat pathogens , either viruses or bacteria .
To do this , certain molecules from the pathogen must be introduced into the body to trigger an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ antigens , and they are present on all viruses and bacteria .
By injecting these antigens into the body , the immune system can safely learn to recognize them as hostile invaders , produce antibodies , and remember them for the future .
If the bacteria or virus reappears , the immune system will recognize the antigens immediately and attack aggressively well before the pathogen can spread and cause sickness .
So why not just inject the body with antigens instead of going through the indirect route of injecting the body with protein @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that tells the body to produce the antigens ?
The answer , it seems , comes down to ease of production .
It ’ s relatively fast , easy and cost effective to synthesize mRNA sequences compared to creating antigens outside the body .
As stated in “ mRNA vaccines — a new era in vaccinology , ” published in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery in 2018 : mRNA vaccines have the potential for rapid , inexpensive and scalable manufacturing , mainly owing to the high yields of in vitro transcription reactions .
A @ @ @ @ @ @ @ RNA can be produced in the laboratory from a DNA template using readily available materials , less expensively and faster than conventional vaccine production , which can require the use of chicken eggs or other mammalian cells .
In other words , mRNA sequences can be quickly and cheaply produced in large quantities , without involving the use of live animals , egg yolks or other animal-derived components .
Many people don ’ t know , for example , that vaccines manufactured today are made from African Green Monkey kidney cells , which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ monkeys , infecting them with deadly diseases , murdering them and harvesting their kidneys to be processed and inserted into vaccines .
The mRNA platform avoids the use of animals in the manufacturing process , although animals are still used in medical experiments for vaccine development and safety testing .
Effectively , mRNA vaccines might be the “ clean ” vaccines that many vaccine skeptics have been demanding for years .
No adjuvants , no animal organs , no stealth viruses .
Just snippets of code , made mostly with simple nucleic acids @ @ @ @ @ @ @ used in mRNA vaccines Instead of being grown in infected animals or animal tissue , mRNA strands are synthesized in a laboratory and don ’ t involve the handling of infectious agents or unknown viral pathogens that may exist in a latent form in animals .
Thus , mRNA vaccines are are some ways inherently safer to manufacture , handle and administer than traditional vaccines .
There exist numerous companies that synthesize mRNA strands for various purposes , including vaccine research .
One such company is called TriLink Biotechnologies ( https : //www.trilinkbiotech.com @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Via their website : We manufacture non-coding RNAs and provide tailored synthesis at milligram to multigram scales , with lengths ranging from a few hundred nucleotides to greater than 10 kilobases .
TriLink has a large collection of modified nucleotides that can modulate innate immune recognition to maximize activity for your specific application mRNAs can be engineered for the quick and cost-effective production of virtually any protein .
They can also induce strong immune responses without the risks associated with some live virus vaccines and so are an effective mechanism for delivering vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for example , to dendritic cells ) or administered in vivo using a delivery vehicle such as an endosome , exogenous mRNAs can be recognized by pattern recognition receptors in cells and so act as their own adjuvant .
Another mRNA synthesis company called SystemBio.com describes their in vitro mRNA synthesis technology as follows : When you want instant expression after transfection into cells , deliver your gene-of-interest as an mRNA made with SBI ’ s mRNAExpress™ mRNA Synthesis Kit .
Designed to generate in vitro transcripts for transfection of mammalian cells , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and other related applications , this high-yield kit can produce 20—40 µg of high-quality mRNAs in one standard reaction , and comes with a number of performance-enhancing features .
The phrase , “ Designed to generate in vitro transcripts for transfection of mammalian cells ” means you ’ re synthesizing mRNA snippets in a lab , to be later injected into mammals ( animals or humans ) .
Overlooking the obvious : The human immune system already knows how to do this , without needing any injections The ( very ) big @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by everyone .
They miss the forest for the trees because your body already possesses mRNA nanotechnology that can identify pathogens and destroy them .
It ’ s part of the immune system with which you were born .
Your immune system is fully capable of astonishing feats of self preservation , but only if it is properly fueled with the nutrients and elements it needs to perform as designed .
Vitamin D deficiency causes immune suppression , and a person who is vitamin D deficient likely won ’ t respond very well @ @ @ @ @ @ @ advanced the technology .
Zinc , selenium and magnesium are critical elements that tend to be deficient in those with poor immune function .
Supplementation with these minerals allows the immune system to reach its full potential , rendering mRNA vaccines largely obsolete .
In effect , we might say that mRNA vaccines are the creation of a deluded society that has censored the truth about nutrition for so long that almost everyone believes we have to become medical mechanics to fix all the body ’ s problems using advanced nanotechnology and expensive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ immune system functions for free… and you were born with it .
Sadly , most people refuse to nourish their immune systems with the necessary components to support effective function .
And almost no one in any position of authority or power will dare recommend nutrition when there ’ s so much money to be made from vaccines and patented pharmaceuticals .
What if the answer to the coronavirus were as simple as recommending vitamin D and zinc ?
If we were only wise enough to allow our own internal nanotechnology to do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have to try to hijack the body ’ s cells using elaborate , expensive and risky medical interventions .
In the same way that the lottery is a tax on people who can ’ t do math , vaccines are medicine for those who don ’ t understand nutrition .
Alex Jones covers what is on the horizon with COVID-19 , the lockdown , the vaccine , and how Big Tech wants to run your life .

mRNA vaccines — also called “genetic vaccines” — arise from an innovative biotechnology approach that turns the body’s cells into molecular factories to produce proteins that activate a pathogen-specific immune response.
The technology holds great promise but also presents significant risks which are not yet fully known.
Summary of what’s in this article:
– mRNA vaccines promise an intriguing new platform for immunization that does not rely on the growth or harvesting of pathogens from animal tissue. This offers mRNA vaccines several key advantages over traditional vaccines.
– Research into mRNA vaccines is still in its infancy, even though various biotech pioneers have been working on ways to achieve mRNA vaccines for around two decades. It is very likely that yet more decades of research will be required to achieve acceptable levels of safety and efficacy.
– mRNA vaccines can be produced far more rapidly, safely and uniformly than traditional vaccines. Production can be easily scaled up, and there is zero risk of introducing “live” pathogens into the body of the patient, since these vaccines don’t use weakened pathogens in the first place.
– There are very real risks associated with mRNA vaccines including “enhanced” inflammation and auto-immune reactions, where the body’s cells are inadvertently programmed to attack critical proteins required for normal health (such as hormones).
– The profit-motivated rush to deploy mRNA vaccines to prevent the spread of the Wuhan coronavirus is causing regulators and researchers to skip (or accelerate) many critical steps in quality control and clinical trials. This is likely to result in catastrophic consequences — unintended side effects — if such vaccines are granted approval for widespread deployment without proper long-term clinical trials.
– mRNA vaccines could be maliciously exploited to weaponize vaccines to target critical physiological functions in humans. This is similar in effect to “RNA interference” technology which is a gene suppressing innovation that has been studied for use as an insect-killing pesticide technology in crops. Although the mechanisms of mRNA vaccines and RNA interference technology are very different, they can achieve many of the same outcomes such as induced infertility or death in targeted organisms, which could include humans. Technically, this could also be exploited to target specific genetic subgroups of humans such as those of African descent.
– The best current application of mRNA vaccines seems to be found in personalized medicine cancer treatment applications, where “vaccines” are customized to teach the body’s immune system to attack and kill cancer cells.
– A reasonable tolerance risk for mRNA vaccine side effects would be proportional to the mortality risk of the pathogen or disease condition the vaccine is treating. For example, if stage IV cancer kills 80% of patients, and a personalized mRNA cancer vaccine cures 50% of patients while killing 5% of patients, the lives-saved-to-patients-killed ratio is 10:1, which would arguably be a reasonable risk to assume. However, if an mRNA coronavirus vaccine is widely given to healthy individuals who are at very low risk of mortality to begin with, then if the mRNA vaccine kills 1 in 1,000 of those people (for example), the vaccine might cause far higher mortality figures than the pathogen itself.
How mRNA vaccines work… hint: They’re not really “vaccines” at all
The term “vaccine” is actually a misnomer. The mRNA approach doesn’t infect the body with a weakened (“attenuated”) virus but rather commands the body’s cells to manufacture specific molecules that trick the immune system into thinking a pathogen is present. In the context of vaccines, these molecules are called “antigens,” and when these antigens are produced inside the body’s cells and subsequently presented to the cell surface, the immune system, in ideal circumstances, sees these antigens as invaders and builds an active immune response to eliminate those antigens.
If the antigens are structured in a way that resembles the targeted viral pathogen — such as the Wuhan coronavirus — the body’s immune response should offer protection against the actual coronavirus.
With mRNA vaccines, what’s injected into the body isn’t a weakened virus or even selected antigens but rather protein coding instructions that tell your body’s cells how to make the antigens on their own. (That process is called “translation.”) It’s sort of like writing down and delivering to someone a set of instructions for building a catapult to protect the castle. Instead of building catapults and delivering them to the castle, you’re telling the inhabitants inside the castle how to build their own catapults to fend off invaders.
Here’s a simplified diagram of this process from Curevac.com, one of the many companies pursuing mRNA vaccines against the coronavirus.
As Curevac explains on its website:
With our mRNA technology, we instruct the human body to activate its own defense mechanism. To that, we use the natural messenger substance mRNA that contains the construction manual needed to produce proteins. We program this messenger substance with the information about one protein of the coronavirus and inject it into the human body. The body recognizes the protein produced by our cells as something unknown and activates its immune cells to produce antibodies and T-cells against it. In this way, we imitate the natural viral infection and activate the endogenous defense system.
In theory, mRNA vaccines offer extraordinary advantages over traditional vaccines. They’re safer to manufacture and a lot faster to make. They’re clean (i.e. they will not contain latent viruses found in the animals used to grow traditional vaccines) and typically require no adjuvants or other toxic additives in order to work as intended. Furthermore, they can direct the body to manufacture almost any protein imaginable. That’s how it works in theory, of course.
But they also present enormous risks, and if the deployment of mRNA vaccines is rushed, the results could be catastrophic. Additionally, mRNA vaccines can be maliciously deployed to deliberately trick the human body into attacking its own critical functions such as fertility, neurological function, cell repair and other critical processes. This is explained in more detail below.
The following video, from CureVac, is actually a fairly good overview of the mRNA platform and its promise. Keep in mind this is a greatly simplified promotional video and it of course doesn’t really get into the potential risks or side effects:
Five risks of mRNA vaccines
The big problem with mRNA vaccines is that human biochemistry is incredibly complex, and the body’s synthesis of tens of thousands of different proteins is remarkably delicate and easy to throw out of balance. Many people don’t realize this, but proteins are not merely structural components of the body (such as muscle tissue), they are also messengers (such as hormones), transport vehicles, enzymes, antibodies and many other types of molecules necessary for good health.
Injecting the body with mRNA strands — which are essentially protein synthesis instructions — could theoretically unleash catastrophic unintended consequences in the body, which could include causing destructive self-reinforcing feedback loops that either diminish necessary protein synthesis or cause runaway excessive protein synthesis. These side effects can potentially lead to at least five negative outcomes:
1) Sudden onset of autoimmune disorders that cause the body’s immune system to attack its own cells. (See more details below.)
2) Heightened inflammation in the body, resulting in a hyper-inflammatory response in some people, leading to secondary effects such as neurological damage, organ failure or cancer. This is also sometimes called an “enhanced” inflammatory response.
3) A heightened risk of blood clotting in response to mRNA strands circulating in the blood outside the body’s cells. This can lead to potentially fatal episodes of stroke or serious cardiovascular events.
4) Immune response interference due to the presence of unintended RNA fragments being translated into unintended proteins, leading to a vast array of negative possible outcomes including molecular deficiencies that can result in various diseases and syndromes including hormonal / endocrine disorders, infertility, cardiovascular disease, neurological disorders and many more.
5) In the case of self-replicating mRNA vaccines using viral components, an inability to stop a runaway process that’s replicating out of control in the body. This could theoretically occur when the mRNA snippets are pushed into cells via virus replicon particles (VRP), for example, or using other viral delivery methods that rely on viral replication machinery. On the other hand, self-replicating mRNA vaccines allow for injection doses to be incredibly small, since the mRNA coding material is self-replicating, and this could lead to safer vaccines with far smaller dosing requirements compared to traditional vaccines.
In addition to these five major risks, there are also enormously important questions about mRNA vaccines and some of the problems they might encounter in the body:
1) What happens if the desired protein folding goes awry? Without proper folding, the proteins never achieve their desired functionality. In the case of antigens, improper folding would render the structure useless and would not impart immunity. The mRNA translation into a protein is only part of the process of building a protein. The “folding” of the protein is another big part. Perhaps this has already been resolved by the very capable scientists working on this platform, but it’s a question that deserves further exploration.
2) How do the antigens produced inside the cell efficiently get transported to the outer membrane of the cell? This answer seems to be confidently answered by experts in this area, but it raises a second round of questions regarding cell membrane permeability which we already know is altered by electromagnetic exposure from sources such as 5G signals from cell towers. Notably, mRNA vaccine researchers are well aware of the phenomenon known as “electroporation,” because it is used alongside “gene gun” approaches in an attempt to insert self-replicating RNA payloads into cells, as you can see mentioned in this study on mRNA vaccines.
3) What happens if the mRNA snippets get fragmented and only partial instructions are delivered to the ribosomes, resulting in translation of partial proteins? This could, in theory, cause the body to see these partial proteins as pathogenic invaders, even when portions of those proteins might match critical molecules the body needs, such as hormones or enzymes. The end result could be that the immune system gets activated against the body’s own necessary molecules or cells. In other words, this is the autoimmune disorder scenario mentioned in the list above, and it opens up a Pandora’s Box of catastrophic consequences that might be impossible to anticipate.
4) How might mRNA vaccines be maliciously weaponized as a depopulation platform to achieve globalist goals of depopulation via forced infertility? If mRNA can encode for the synthesis of any desired protein, it’s a simple matter to use the platform to build hormone-resembling antigens that would “teach” the human body to attack specific hormones necessary for reproduction and gestation. This, in turn, would theoretically result in widespread female infertility, thereby achieving globalist depopulation goals through vaccine-induced “autoimmune infertility.”
Manufacturers of mRNA vaccines no doubt say all these risks can be mitigated. While that might be true after perhaps 40 years of research and trials, the complexity of the body screams out for additional long-term research on this platform — perhaps 25 years more — not a rushed vaccine that skips animal trials and compresses many years of typical safety research into just a few months.
Importantly, many of the theoretical side effects of an mRNA vaccine would not become apparent until months or years after the initial injection. These adverse events are likely to be systemic, not acute, and would not become apparent in short-term clinical trials. This is a critical issue to grasp, since mRNA vaccines are right now being rushed through short-term clinical trials, leaving open the possibility of long-term unintended side effects that were not anticipated by vaccine manufacturers or FDA regulators.
Advantages of mRNA vaccines
– They don’t need to be grown in animal organs or chicken eggs, eliminating the risk of cross-species contamination of the vaccine.
– mRNA vaccine makers currently claim that their vaccines don’t require the use of inflammation-inducing adjuvants, which are widely known to be responsible for many of the toxic effects of present-day vaccines.
– Because the vaccine doesn’t consist of pathogens, there is zero risk of “live” pathogens accidentally being injected into the patient, contributing to further spread of infectious disease. This has occurred numerous times with classic vaccines.
– mRNA vaccines are much easier and faster to produce than traditional vaccines. Their manufacture is also easily standardized, with far greater purity and quality control potential than with vaccines which are made from animal tissue.
– The injection doses can be orders of magnitude smaller than for traditional vaccines.
– When mRNA vaccines are specifically programmed to target a patient’s pathogenic cancer tissue, the customized mRNA “vaccine” can be incredibly effective at teaching the body to destroy cancer cells. This is sometimes referred to as a “cancer vaccine,” although the label is misleading. It’s actually a form of personalized medicine where the body is aided in the selective destruction of the very specific cancer cells which are replicating in that patient’s body.
More details about the possible risks of mRNA vaccines
Here’s a summary of the current situation with mRNA vaccines, courtesy of the University of Cambridge and its phg Foundation:
There is still a lot of work to be done before mRNA vaccines can become standard treatments, in the meantime, we need a better understanding of their potential side effects, and more evidence of their long term efficacy.
In other words, mRNA vaccines hold very high long-term promise, but they are nowhere near being ready for large-scale commercial production and administration into billions of people, even though that seems to be the goal of the Moderna corporation and those pushing for a rapid vaccine response to the coronavirus pandemic.
Some of the known risks of mRNA vaccines include:
– The possibility that mRNA fragments might, through some currently unknown process, enter the cell nucleus and alter the genome of the host. mRNA vaccine companies currently claim this is impossible, but the history of medicine is full of examples of arrogant scientists making catastrophic assumptions about the human body that turned out to be overly optimistic.
– Because mRNA fragments code instructions for protein synthesis in the body, mRNA vaccines could be used to inject the body with “Trojan Horse” payloads of other proteins that are intended to carry out a long list of nefarious ill effects in human hosts, including infertility. This is crucial to note because the W.H.O. approved vaccines administered to young women in Africa have already been found to be laced with HCG, an infertility chemical designed to help achieve global depopulation. Given that many of the most noted vaccine proponents are also depopulation advocates, the exploitation of the mRNA platform to achieve infertility or accelerated deaths cannot be discounted.
– Some types of mRNA vaccines — called “self-amplifying” — inject the body with “viral replication machinery” to force the body to keep replicating the encoded proteins for an extended period of time, making it impossible to stop the process once the injection has taken place.
– The immune response may be far larger than intended, as the body sees the introduced mRNA fragments as evidence that the body is under attack from a pathogen. “Unintended effects: the mRNA strand in the vaccine may elicit an unintended immune reaction,” explains the phg Foundation (Univ. of Cambridge). And as Stephane Bancel, CEO of Moderna, said in a TEDxBeaconStreet conference in 2013:
mRNA creates an immune response. Why? Because a virus is made of mRNA. Like the flu. So if we inject mRNA in a patient, what happens? Your body thinks you just got the flu. And it’s not very good for our drug, because you know all the symptoms of the flu. Not super nice… and the problem of going very high in dose, as you go around your body, you have a ton of side effects.
– There exists a very well known risk that mRNA material introduced into the body may produce autoimmune reactions, where the body’s cells are essentially programmed to attack other healthy cells. From, “mRNA vaccines — a new era in vaccinology,” published in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery in 2018, authored by Norbert Pardi and colleagues:
…recent human trials have demonstrated moderate and in rare cases severe injection site or systemic reactions for different mRNA platforms…
A possible concern could be that some mRNA-based vaccine platforms54,166 induce potent type I interferon responses, which have been associated not only with inflammation but also potentially with autoimmunity.
Another potential safety issue could derive from the presence of extracellular RNA during mRNA vaccination. Extracellular naked RNA has been shown to increase the permeability of tightly packed endothelial cells and may thus contribute to oedema. Another study showed that extracellular RNA promoted blood coagulation and pathological thrombus formation…
In other words, having RNA floating around in the blood, outside the cells — which is how mRNA vaccines are administered — caused blood clotting, which also happens to be one of the deadly side effects of COVID-19 itself. Autoimmune reactions have also been noted in the research.
mRNA vaccines are far easier and faster to produce than traditional vaccines… and they don’t use animals to grow diseased organs
All this raises the question: If the purpose of mRNA vaccines is to program the body’s cells to manufacture antigens which are then recognized by the immune system, why not just inject the body with antigens in the first place and skip the need to hijack the body’s protein synthesis machinery?
As PublicHealth.org explains on its “How vaccine work” page, it seems clear that injecting antigens would be a more direct route to desired levels of immunity rather than injecting mRNA instructions that tell the body’s cells to produce the antigens:
A vaccine works by training the immune system to recognize and combat pathogens, either viruses or bacteria. To do this, certain molecules from the pathogen must be introduced into the body to trigger an immune response.
These molecules are called antigens, and they are present on all viruses and bacteria. By injecting these antigens into the body, the immune system can safely learn to recognize them as hostile invaders, produce antibodies, and remember them for the future. If the bacteria or virus reappears, the immune system will recognize the antigens immediately and attack aggressively well before the pathogen can spread and cause sickness.
So why not just inject the body with antigens instead of going through the indirect route of injecting the body with protein synthesis instructions (i.e. mRNA) that tells the body to produce the antigens?
The answer, it seems, comes down to ease of production. It’s relatively fast, easy and cost effective to synthesize mRNA sequences compared to creating antigens outside the body.
As stated in “mRNA vaccines — a new era in vaccinology,” published in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery in 2018:
mRNA vaccines have the potential for rapid, inexpensive and scalable manufacturing, mainly owing to the high yields of in vitro transcription reactions.
The University of Cambridge phg Foundation adds:
A major advantage of RNA vaccines is that RNA can be produced in the laboratory from a DNA template using readily available materials, less expensively and faster than conventional vaccine production, which can require the use of chicken eggs or other mammalian cells.
In other words, mRNA sequences can be quickly and cheaply produced in large quantities, without involving the use of live animals, egg yolks or other animal-derived components. Many people don’t know, for example, that vaccines manufactured today are made from African Green Monkey kidney cells, which are acquired by first capturing and imprisoning monkeys, infecting them with deadly diseases, murdering them and harvesting their kidneys to be processed and inserted into vaccines.
The mRNA platform avoids the use of animals in the manufacturing process, although animals are still used in medical experiments for vaccine development and safety testing. Effectively, mRNA vaccines might be the “clean” vaccines that many vaccine skeptics have been demanding for years. No adjuvants, no animal organs, no stealth viruses. Just snippets of code, made mostly with simple nucleic acids.
Synthesis of mRNA materials to be used in mRNA vaccines
Instead of being grown in infected animals or animal tissue, mRNA strands are synthesized in a laboratory and don’t involve the handling of infectious agents or unknown viral pathogens that may exist in a latent form in animals. Thus, mRNA vaccines are are some ways inherently safer to manufacture, handle and administer than traditional vaccines.
There exist numerous companies that synthesize mRNA strands for various purposes, including vaccine research. One such company is called TriLink Biotechnologies (https://www.trilinkbiotech.com) which offers custom mRNA synthesis. Via their website:
We manufacture non-coding RNAs and provide tailored synthesis at milligram to multigram scales, with lengths ranging from a few hundred nucleotides to greater than 10 kilobases. TriLink has a large collection of modified nucleotides that can modulate innate immune recognition to maximize activity for your specific application
From the TriLink Antigen mRNA page:
mRNAs can be engineered for the quick and cost-effective production of virtually any protein. They can also induce strong immune responses without the risks associated with some live virus vaccines and so are an effective mechanism for delivering vaccine antigens. Whether delivered ex vivo (for example, to dendritic cells) or administered in vivo using a delivery vehicle such as an endosome, exogenous mRNAs can be recognized by pattern recognition receptors in cells and so act as their own adjuvant.
Another mRNA synthesis company called SystemBio.com describes their in vitro mRNA synthesis technology as follows:
When you want instant expression after transfection into cells, deliver your gene-of-interest as an mRNA made with SBI’s mRNAExpress™ mRNA Synthesis Kit. Designed to generate in vitro transcripts for transfection of mammalian cells, micro-injection into oocytes, in vitro translation, and other related applications, this high-yield kit can produce 20—40 µg of high-quality mRNAs in one standard reaction, and comes with a number of performance-enhancing features.
The phrase, “Designed to generate in vitro transcripts for transfection of mammalian cells” means you’re synthesizing mRNA snippets in a lab, to be later injected into mammals (animals or humans).
Overlooking the obvious: The human immune system already knows how to do this, without needing any injections
The (very) big picture in all this is often overlooked by everyone. They miss the forest for the trees because your body already possesses mRNA nanotechnology that can identify pathogens and destroy them. It’s part of the immune system with which you were born.
Your immune system is fully capable of astonishing feats of self preservation, but only if it is properly fueled with the nutrients and elements it needs to perform as designed. Vitamin D deficiency causes immune suppression, and a person who is vitamin D deficient likely won’t respond very well to an mRNA vaccine no matter how advanced the technology.
Zinc, selenium and magnesium are critical elements that tend to be deficient in those with poor immune function. Supplementation with these minerals allows the immune system to reach its full potential, rendering mRNA vaccines largely obsolete.
In effect, we might say that mRNA vaccines are the creation of a deluded society that has censored the truth about nutrition for so long that almost everyone believes we have to become medical mechanics to fix all the body’s problems using advanced nanotechnology and expensive breakthroughs. But in reality, your immune system functions for free… and you were born with it. Sadly, most people refuse to nourish their immune systems with the necessary components to support effective function. And almost no one in any position of authority or power will dare recommend nutrition when there’s so much money to be made from vaccines and patented pharmaceuticals.
What if the answer to the coronavirus were as simple as recommending vitamin D and zinc? If we were only wise enough to allow our own internal nanotechnology to do its job, we wouldn’t have to try to hijack the body’s cells using elaborate, expensive and risky medical interventions.
In the same way that the lottery is a tax on people who can’t do math, vaccines are medicine for those who don’t understand nutrition.
Sources for this article include:
“Nonviral delivery of self-amplifying RNA vaccines” https://www.pnas.org/content/109/36/14604
“mRNA vaccines — a new era in vaccinology” https://www.nature.com/articles/nrd.2017.243
phg Foundation, University of Cambridge https://www.phgfoundation.org/briefing/rna-vaccines
Vaccines.news https://vaccines.news/2017-11-10-bombshell-science-paper-documents-the-depopulation-chemical-covertly-spiked-into-vaccines.html
Alex Jones covers what is on the horizon with COVID-19, the lockdown, the vaccine, and how Big Tech wants to run your life.


newswars--2020-05-26--Fear of Discomfort Driving Virus Hysteria

When our ancestors dealt with pandemics , instincts designed for our survival were still intact .
After being kept in artificial habitats for so long , humans have lost touch .
Even amidst the current crisis , we now live in more comfort than any of our ancestors could have possibly imagined .
What was the first thing that was hoarded en masse when facing lockdowns ?
Toilet paper .
Food is delivered to our doors – by robots in some places – when we used to hunt for it .
The lights still come on when you flick the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wood and light a fire .
We binge watch netflix through the internet , when we used to spend free time connecting with other humans .
Most humans – who are every day drawn further and further into the digital world – now have a deep fear of discomfort .
Prescriptions for antidepressants in the western world were already sky high prior to Coronavirus .
Now , prescriptions have spiked 86 % during the lockdown .
We are told to isolate ourselves in climate-controlled houses and deprive ourselves of nature , exercise and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ outside world through screens .
Images of humans gathered in large groups is now being projected as a fearful sight .
Modern civilization should by no means be disregarded , but going forward we need to cultivate the grit that brought us to this point .
We need to change our culture to again value liberty , self-reliance , and pursue a potential future in space exploration to rekindle the spirit of mankind .
If we allow a scientific dictatorship to mold us at its will , we are finished .
“ All @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wilderness road , and our past is not a dead past , but still lives in us .
Our forefathers had civilization inside themselves , the wild outside .
We live in the civilization they created , but within us the wilderness still lingers .
What they dreamed , we live , and what they lived , we dream.
” – T.K .
Whipple Alex Jones covers what is on the horizon with COVID-19 , the lockdown , the vaccine , and how Big Tech wants to run your life .

When our ancestors dealt with pandemics, instincts designed for our survival were still intact. After being kept in artificial habitats for so long, humans have lost touch.
Even amidst the current crisis, we now live in more comfort than any of our ancestors could have possibly imagined.
What was the first thing that was hoarded en masse when facing lockdowns? Toilet paper.
Food is delivered to our doors – by robots in some places – when we used to hunt for it. The lights still come on when you flick the switch, when we used to gather wood and light a fire. We binge watch netflix through the internet, when we used to spend free time connecting with other humans.
Most humans – who are every day drawn further and further into the digital world – now have a deep fear of discomfort.
Prescriptions for antidepressants in the western world were already sky high prior to Coronavirus. Now, prescriptions have spiked 86% during the lockdown.
We are told to isolate ourselves in climate-controlled houses and deprive ourselves of nature, exercise and sunlight while “interacting” with the outside world through screens. Images of humans gathered in large groups is now being projected as a fearful sight.
Modern civilization should by no means be disregarded, but going forward we need to cultivate the grit that brought us to this point.
We need to change our culture to again value liberty, self-reliance, and pursue a potential future in space exploration to rekindle the spirit of mankind.
If we allow a scientific dictatorship to mold us at its will, we are finished.
“All America lies at the end of the wilderness road, and our past is not a dead past, but still lives in us. Our forefathers had civilization inside themselves, the wild outside. We live in the civilization they created, but within us the wilderness still lingers. What they dreamed, we live, and what they lived, we dream.” – T.K. Whipple
Alex Jones covers what is on the horizon with COVID-19, the lockdown, the vaccine, and how Big Tech wants to run your life.


newswars--2020-05-26--Leftist Guardian Writer Tweets Desire to Physically Attack Conservative MP in Front of His Children

A leftist podcaster who writes for the Guardian has tweeted his desire to physically attack a Conservative MP in front of his children .
Andy Dawson , who writes for major left-wing newspapers the Guardian and the Mirror and also co-hosts a podcast called Athletico Mince , was responding to a tweet by Sarah Vine , wife of Michael Gove MP .
“ As someone who has been followed and insulted in the street in front of my own children , I would say that this is a classic example of what happens when a Twitter mob spills into real @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tweeted Vine .
She was responding to video footage of Dominic Cummings being harassed by his own neighbors in response to a controversy where critics claimed Cummings , an advisor to Boris Johnson , violated lockdown to travel north in search of urgent care for his child .
Dawson chose to express his anger over seeing Gove defend Cummings on television by threatening to viciously attack Gove and have his children witness their father being beaten up .
“ Hey you – I see your cunt of a husband is lying through his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ morning , ” tweeted Dawson .
“ I ’ d pay hard cash to chase the fucker down the street and boot him in the balls , and DEFINITELY in front of your kids cuz they need to know what a rank shithouse their dad is , ” he added .
Dawson locked down his Twitter account soon after he started receiving backlash for the tweet .
“ Verified leftist Andy Dawson , a writer for the Guardian and the Daily Mirror , not only advocates for political violence ( ie terrorism ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s willing to finance it as well .
Exactly what democracy is left in the UK ?
” asked Breitbart ’ s Chris Tomlinson .
The “ so much for the tolerant left ” cliché has been a meme for years , but this once again underscores how the same people who continually whine about abuse , harassment and hate are in fact the most hateful people in politics .
It also highlights the two tier system operated by social media giants like Twitter , which routinely bans conservatives for their opinions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even against elected members of Parliament , to go unpunished .
Suffice to say , Dawson ’ s verified account remains very much active .
However , he isn ’ t receiving much back up , with even leftists surprised by his vicious outburst .
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever .
It is CRUCIAL that you support me .
Please sign up for the free newsletter here .
Donate to me on SubscribeStar here .
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the comedown .

A leftist podcaster who writes for the Guardian has tweeted his desire to physically attack a Conservative MP in front of his children.
Andy Dawson, who writes for major left-wing newspapers the Guardian and the Mirror and also co-hosts a podcast called Athletico Mince, was responding to a tweet by Sarah Vine, wife of Michael Gove MP.
“As someone who has been followed and insulted in the street in front of my own children, I would say that this is a classic example of what happens when a Twitter mob spills into real life. Terrifying and disproportionate,” tweeted Vine.
She was responding to video footage of Dominic Cummings being harassed by his own neighbors in response to a controversy where critics claimed Cummings, an advisor to Boris Johnson, violated lockdown to travel north in search of urgent care for his child.
Dawson chose to express his anger over seeing Gove defend Cummings on television by threatening to viciously attack Gove and have his children witness their father being beaten up.
Verified leftist Andy Dawson, a writer for the Guardian and the Daily Mirror, not only advocates for political violence (ie terrorism) against a sitting cabinet minister, he’s willing to finance it as well.
Exactly what democracy is left in the UK? pic.twitter.com/DJS4xYk8Jp — Chris Tomlinson (@TomlinsonCJ) May 26, 2020
“Hey you – I see your cunt of a husband is lying through his fucking teeth all over the TV this morning,” tweeted Dawson. “I’d pay hard cash to chase the fucker down the street and boot him in the balls, and DEFINITELY in front of your kids cuz they need to know what a rank shithouse their dad is,” he added.
Dawson locked down his Twitter account soon after he started receiving backlash for the tweet.
“Verified leftist Andy Dawson, a writer for the Guardian and the Daily Mirror, not only advocates for political violence (ie terrorism) against a sitting cabinet minister, he’s willing to finance it as well. Exactly what democracy is left in the UK?” asked Breitbart’s Chris Tomlinson.
The “so much for the tolerant left” cliché has been a meme for years, but this once again underscores how the same people who continually whine about abuse, harassment and hate are in fact the most hateful people in politics.
It also highlights the two tier system operated by social media giants like Twitter, which routinely bans conservatives for their opinions yet allows clear threats of violence, even against elected members of Parliament, to go unpunished.
Suffice to say, Dawson’s verified account remains very much active.
However, he isn’t receiving much back up, with even leftists surprised by his vicious outburst.
Was a big fan of this podcast, but not gonna be listening to it again, not while Andy Dawson is still there. His childish outburst against Sarah Vine has put me off the idea of supporting him in any way. I don’t like the tories either, you don’t have to be cruel about it. 🙁 — political cumstain (@AbsoluteWelt) May 26, 2020
Like all cowards, @profanityswan hiding behind a private account https://t.co/lMBg6FsqMy — Sarah ‘books’ Vine (@WestminsterWAG) May 26, 2020
@Spotify Dear Spotify, you currently host a podcast run by the above individual Andy Dawson under Athletico Mince. Due to the threat of violence in front of children made in the above post I believe you should review his ability to promote such hate speak to a wider audience. — Rob Kilby (@DrPhibes1) May 26, 2020
Andy Dawson (Guardian and Daily Mirror contributor among other things) sent this message about Michael Gove to his wife Sarah Vine. Shocking vitriol and possibly illegal under the Malicious Communications Act. The disappointing thing is that at least 775 people liked it. pic.twitter.com/NbW8ddh8du — KP Hicks (@K_P_Hicks) May 26, 2020
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me.
Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-05-27--Head of Site Integrity & Election Security at Twitter Thinks There Are “Actual Nazis in the White Ho

Head of Site Integrity & Election Security at Twitter Thinks There Are “Actual Nazis in the White House”

After Twitter announced it would start ‘ fact-checking ’ President Trump ’ s tweets , it was revealed that the head of ‘ site integrity ’ at the social media giant thinks everyone who voted for Trump is racist and that there are “ actual Nazis in the White House.
” After California Governor Gavin Newsom signed an executive order to ensure all voters will receive mail ballots for the election in November , Trump warned in a tweet , “ Mail boxes will be robbed , ballots will be forged and even illegally printed out and fraudulently signed.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a warning label that asserted , “ there is no evidence that mail-in ballots are linked to voter fraud , ” citing CNN and the Washington Post .
The warning also highlighted numerous tweets from blue check mark leftists claiming Trump was wrong .
As we document , most of these individuals are obsessed with Trump and spend virtually every day hyperventilating about him on Twitter – hardly the “ neutral ” source one could rely on to provide a ‘ fact check ’ .
This prompted Trump to later tweet , “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ silence conservatives voices .
We will strongly regulate , or close them down , before we can ever allow this to happen.
” It has now emerged that Twitter ’ s “ head of site integrity , ” Joel Roth , the leader of the team responsible for developing and enforcing Twitter ’ s rules , is a hardcore anti-Trump leftist .
“ I ’ m just saying , we fly over those states that voted for a racist tangerine for a reason , ” he tweeted in November 2016 .
Roth also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ IN THE WHITE HOUSE , ” something that probably wouldn ’ t stand up to a ‘ fact check ’ .
He also compared White House counselor Kellyanne Conway to Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels .
Roth has been head of site integrity at Twitter since July 2018 and is responsible for “ election security ” and “ misinformation , ” meaning he almost certainly played a key role in the decision to ‘ fact-check ’ Trump ’ s tweets .
In the meantime , We await Twitter ‘ fact-checking ’ false claims @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other of the erroneous issues pushed by the blue check mark brigade that have proven to be spectacularly wrong .
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever .
It is CRUCIAL that you support me .
Please sign up for the free newsletter here .
Donate to me on SubscribeStar here .
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown .

After Twitter announced it would start ‘fact-checking’ President Trump’s tweets, it was revealed that the head of ‘site integrity’ at the social media giant thinks everyone who voted for Trump is racist and that there are “actual Nazis in the White House.”
After California Governor Gavin Newsom signed an executive order to ensure all voters will receive mail ballots for the election in November, Trump warned in a tweet, “Mail boxes will be robbed, ballots will be forged and even illegally printed out and fraudulently signed.”
Twitter then slapped several Trump tweets with a warning label that asserted, “there is no evidence that mail-in ballots are linked to voter fraud,” citing CNN and the Washington Post.
The warning also highlighted numerous tweets from blue check mark leftists claiming Trump was wrong. As we document, most of these individuals are obsessed with Trump and spend virtually every day hyperventilating about him on Twitter – hardly the “neutral” source one could rely on to provide a ‘fact check’.
This prompted Trump to later tweet, “Republicans feel that Social Media Platforms totally silence conservatives voices. We will strongly regulate, or close them down, before we can ever allow this to happen.”
….happen again. Just like we can’t let large scale Mail-In Ballots take root in our Country. It would be a free for all on cheating, forgery and the theft of Ballots. Whoever cheated the most would win. Likewise, Social Media. Clean up your act, NOW!!!! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 27, 2020
It has now emerged that Twitter’s “head of site integrity,” Joel Roth, the leader of the team responsible for developing and enforcing Twitter’s rules, is a hardcore anti-Trump leftist.
This person is the “head of site integrity” at Twitter pic.twitter.com/hyZcl5VIe0 — Jon Levine (@LevineJonathan) May 27, 2020
“I’m just saying, we fly over those states that voted for a racist tangerine for a reason,” he tweeted in November 2016.
Roth also claimed that there were “ACTUAL NAZIS IN THE WHITE HOUSE,” something that probably wouldn’t stand up to a ‘fact check’.
He also compared White House counselor Kellyanne Conway to Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels.
“He leads the teams responsible for developing and enforcing Twitter’s rules” pic.twitter.com/OdBTqlInDZ — Jon Levine (@LevineJonathan) May 27, 2020
Roth has been head of site integrity at Twitter since July 2018 and is responsible for “election security” and “misinformation,” meaning he almost certainly played a key role in the decision to ‘fact-check’ Trump’s tweets.
In the meantime, We await Twitter ‘fact-checking’ false claims about ‘Russian collusion’ or any other of the erroneous issues pushed by the blue check mark brigade that have proven to be spectacularly wrong.
Don’t hold your breath.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me.
Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-05-27--We Are Being Told To Prepare “To See High Prices At Grocery Stores” And “It’s Likely That Shortages

We Are Being Told To Prepare “To See High Prices At Grocery Stores” And “It’s Likely That Shortages May Only Get Worse”

If you have been to a grocery store lately , then you already know that prices are higher than usual and that there are shortages of certain items .
Many Americans have been assuming that as COVID-19 restrictions are slowly rolled back that these shortages will eventually disappear , but now even the Washington Post is admitting that “ shortages may get worse ” in the weeks and months ahead .
Of course there will still be plenty of food available in the grocery stores , but you may have to do without some of your favorite products for a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are just like Alyssa Milano ’ s And you should also brace yourself for significantly higher prices for many of the products that do remain available .
As WBTV has noted , this will especially be true for basic meat staples such as ground beef and chicken… All over the country , COVID-19 is playing havoc with food distribution systems , and nobody has been hit harder than meat processing facilities .
The virus has spread like wildfire in such facilities , and this has resulted in many of them being forced to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time .
With less supply and roughly the same level of demand , meat prices have escalated quite a bit in recent weeks .
In fact , in April we witnessed the largest spike in food prices in 46 years… Of course there have also been whispers that some funny business has been taking place among the meatpacking giants , and federal officials are now investigating allegations of price fixing… But no matter how that investigation unfolds , we should expect higher prices to continue , because the industry simply can not produce @ @ @ @ @ @ @ many facilities shut down right now .
And with each passing day , we learn of more workers that have become infected .
In fact , 570 workers at a single Tyson Foods plant in North Carolina just tested positive for the virus… With so many meat processing facilities all over the nation currently idle , many farmers simply do not have anyone to sell to right now , and this has pushed many of them to the brink of financial ruin .
For example , it is exceedingly expensive to raise chickens @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so many plants closed down North Carolina farmers are now being forced “ to euthanize 1.5 million chickens ” … Similar scenarios are playing out all over the U.S. , and this is truly a tremendous tragedy .
Unlike some other areas around the globe right now , we would actually have plenty of meat if the farmers could get their animals through the supply chain .
Unfortunately , fear of COVID-19 has thrown the supply chain into a state of chaos , and that is likely to continue for the foreseeable future @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is now warning us “ that shortages may only get worse ” … The good news is that eventually this pandemic will subside , and when that happens it is likely that the supply chain will start to revert back to normal once again .
But if fear of COVID-19 can cause this much chaos for our food distribution systems , what will happen once a much more severe crisis hits us ?
When things really start going crazy in this country , basic supplies will disappear from the stores very rapidly , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be bringing baskets of food to your door .
In the end , you will be on your own .
And in the short-term , you should expect food prices to continue to rise .
The federal government has been borrowing and spending trillions of dollars that we do not have during this pandemic , and the Federal Reserve has cranked up the money creation machine to absolutely absurd levels .
What this means is that the value of our currency is rapidly being devalued , and eventually we will see very painful @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seem really high right now , but they are only going to go up from here .
So stock up on what you can while you have this window of opportunity to do so , because this window of opportunity will not last indefinitely .

If you have been to a grocery store lately, then you already know that prices are higher than usual and that there are shortages of certain items.
Many Americans have been assuming that as COVID-19 restrictions are slowly rolled back that these shortages will eventually disappear, but now even the Washington Post is admitting that “shortages may get worse” in the weeks and months ahead.
Of course there will still be plenty of food available in the grocery stores, but you may have to do without some of your favorite products for a while.
Kaitlin tries on masks that are just like Alyssa Milano’s
And you should also brace yourself for significantly higher prices for many of the products that do remain available. As WBTV has noted, this will especially be true for basic meat staples such as ground beef and chicken…
Americans looking to get outside this holiday weekend, maybe fire up the grill, should be prepared to see high prices at grocery stores, especially cookout staples like ground beef and chicken. The meat at the store is a little bit more expensive because of plants that are shutting down and causing a logjam in the food supply chain.
All over the country, COVID-19 is playing havoc with food distribution systems, and nobody has been hit harder than meat processing facilities. The virus has spread like wildfire in such facilities, and this has resulted in many of them being forced to shut down for an extended period of time.
With less supply and roughly the same level of demand, meat prices have escalated quite a bit in recent weeks. In fact, in April we witnessed the largest spike in food prices in 46 years…
Prices Americans paid for eggs, meat, cereal and milk shot higher in April as people flocked to grocery stores to stock up on food amid government lockdowns designed to slow the spread of Covid-19. The Labor Department reported Tuesday that prices U.S. consumers paid for groceries jumped 2.6% in April, the largest one-month pop since February 1974. The spike in supermarket prices was broad based and impacted items from broccoli and ham to oatmeal and tuna.
Of course there have also been whispers that some funny business has been taking place among the meatpacking giants, and federal officials are now investigating allegations of price fixing…
Federal prosecutors are looking into allegations that the meatpacking industry is coordinating or manipulating prices, a person familiar with the investigation told FOX News. The Department of Justice investigation has been going on for “months,” the source said. Prosecutors are specifically scrutinizing the four largest meatpackers in the U.S., which control more than 80 percent of the market: JBS, National Beef, Tyson Foods and Cargill.
But no matter how that investigation unfolds, we should expect higher prices to continue, because the industry simply cannot produce as much meat as usual with so many facilities shut down right now.
And with each passing day, we learn of more workers that have become infected. In fact, 570 workers at a single Tyson Foods plant in North Carolina just tested positive for the virus…
Meat processing plants across the country are struggling with outbreaks of the coronavirus. That includes the Tyson Foods chicken processing facility in Wilkes County, N.C. More than 2,200 workers were tested at the Wilkesboro plant, and 570 were positive for the coronavirus.
With so many meat processing facilities all over the nation currently idle, many farmers simply do not have anyone to sell to right now, and this has pushed many of them to the brink of financial ruin.
For example, it is exceedingly expensive to raise chickens on a massive scale, but with so many plants closed down North Carolina farmers are now being forced “to euthanize 1.5 million chickens”…
Coronavirus outbreaks at meat processing plants are forcing North Carolina farmers to euthanize 1.5 million chickens, according to a state official. Assistant Agriculture Commissioner Joe Reardon told The News & Observer that this is the first time during the pandemic that North Carolina farmers have had to euthanize their animals. Roughly a third of the 1.5 million chickens already had been killed, Reardon said.
Similar scenarios are playing out all over the U.S., and this is truly a tremendous tragedy.
Unlike some other areas around the globe right now, we would actually have plenty of meat if the farmers could get their animals through the supply chain.
Unfortunately, fear of COVID-19 has thrown the supply chain into a state of chaos, and that is likely to continue for the foreseeable future. In fact, the mainstream media is now warning us “that shortages may only get worse”…
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has estimated at least 5,000 workers were infected by the end of April, though advocates have suggested there could be more than 17,000. And with plants already slow to respond to outbreaks and some still partially closed, it’s likely that shortages may only get worse.
The good news is that eventually this pandemic will subside, and when that happens it is likely that the supply chain will start to revert back to normal once again.
But if fear of COVID-19 can cause this much chaos for our food distribution systems, what will happen once a much more severe crisis hits us?
When things really start going crazy in this country, basic supplies will disappear from the stores very rapidly, and the government is not going to be bringing baskets of food to your door.
In the end, you will be on your own.
And in the short-term, you should expect food prices to continue to rise. The federal government has been borrowing and spending trillions of dollars that we do not have during this pandemic, and the Federal Reserve has cranked up the money creation machine to absolutely absurd levels. What this means is that the value of our currency is rapidly being devalued, and eventually we will see very painful inflation.
I know that food prices seem really high right now, but they are only going to go up from here.
So stock up on what you can while you have this window of opportunity to do so, because this window of opportunity will not last indefinitely.


newswars--2020-05-27--Epstein Lawyer: ‘It Was Homicide, But I Don’t Know Who Killed Him’

Jeffrey Epstein ’ s lead attorney says that he knows the billionaire pedophile was murdered in prison , but does not know who the killer/s is/are , noting that Epstein was ‘ upbeat and excited ’ about going to the courts in an attempt to clear his name .
Epstein ’ s lawyer David Schoen made the comments in a Discovery documentary series about the disgraced multi-millionaire , revealing that the financier was preparing to reveal key information at trial .
Schoen is adamant that Epstein was not suicidal , noting “ At one point a prison psychiatrist came in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could talk to Epstein on his own .
They talked for five minutes and he seemed relaxed .
He was smiling as she left.
” “ He had plans to really fight this case .
He ’ d made arrangements to hire me.
” Schoen added .
In the three part documentary , titled Who Killed Jeffrey Epstein ?
, Schoen also said he was very concerned about Nicholas Tartaglione , a huge former cop , charged with four murders , who was initially sharing a cell with Epstein during his first alleged @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that happened which the newspapers reported as a possible suicide attempt , Epstein didn ’ t want to discuss any further .
He told the prison officers he couldn ’ t remember what happened , he didn ’ t want to answer any more questions , ” Schoen said .
“ Look , he was in a dangerous situation .
He ’ s a very wealthy guy accused of sex offences stuck in with a guy accused of four murders.
” the lawyer added .
“ First of all he shouldn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ population , that ’ s reprehensible… He ’ d have guys who watch the nightly news on the prison TV and say to him , $ 70 million mansion , huh ?
” Schoen proclaimed .
“ I ’ ve been through this with other clients and I told him to keep him an eye on this and tell me if anyone was extorting him.
” the lawyer said .
Schoen also said that he was disappointed that Epstein ’ s ‘ powerful friends ’ kept their stance after his arrest .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would be the one guy who stood up and said he was a friend , I didn ’ t know anything about it.
” Schoen said .
The lawyer also slated the legal team that he took over from , calling Epstein ’ s former legal representative Jay Lefkowitz a ‘ numbskull ’ .
Schoen also claimed that lawyers acting on behalf of victims were trying to milk Epstein for millions , in some cases asking for payments of up to $ 25 million to make the claims vanish .
“ I wanted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ much lawyers were making off this thing .
I ’ d hope that some people agree that some of these women tricked him.
” Schoen declared .
The documentary is airing simultaneously with a Netflix special that features testimony from witnesses and victims of Epstein ’ s sordid activities .

Jeffrey Epstein’s lead attorney says that he knows the billionaire pedophile was murdered in prison, but does not know who the killer/s is/are, noting that Epstein was ‘upbeat and excited’ about going to the courts in an attempt to clear his name.
Epstein’s lawyer David Schoen made the comments in a Discovery documentary series about the disgraced multi-millionaire, revealing that the financier was preparing to reveal key information at trial.
Schoen is adamant that Epstein was not suicidal, noting “At one point a prison psychiatrist came in and asked me to leave so she could talk to Epstein on his own. They talked for five minutes and he seemed relaxed. He was smiling as she left.”
“He had plans to really fight this case. He’d made arrangements to hire me.” Schoen added.
In the three part documentary, titled Who Killed Jeffrey Epstein?, Schoen also said he was very concerned about Nicholas Tartaglione, a huge former cop, charged with four murders, who was initially sharing a cell with Epstein during his first alleged suicide attempt.
“The first incident that happened which the newspapers reported as a possible suicide attempt, Epstein didn’t want to discuss any further. He told the prison officers he couldn’t remember what happened, he didn’t want to answer any more questions,” Schoen said.
“Look, he was in a dangerous situation. He’s a very wealthy guy accused of sex offences stuck in with a guy accused of four murders.” the lawyer added.
“First of all he shouldn’t have been locked up in the general population, that’s reprehensible… He’d have guys who watch the nightly news on the prison TV and say to him, $70 million mansion, huh?” Schoen proclaimed.
“I’ve been through this with other clients and I told him to keep him an eye on this and tell me if anyone was extorting him.” the lawyer said.
Schoen also said that he was disappointed that Epstein’s ‘powerful friends’ kept their stance after his arrest.
“I’d hoped that Prince Andrew would be the one guy who stood up and said he was a friend, I didn’t know anything about it.” Schoen said.
The lawyer also slated the legal team that he took over from, calling Epstein’s former legal representative Jay Lefkowitz a ‘numbskull’.
Schoen also claimed that lawyers acting on behalf of victims were trying to milk Epstein for millions, in some cases asking for payments of up to $25 million to make the claims vanish.
“I wanted people to report on the fact how much lawyers were making off this thing. I’d hope that some people agree that some of these women tricked him.” Schoen declared.
The documentary is airing simultaneously with a Netflix special that features testimony from witnesses and victims of Epstein’s sordid activities.


newswars--2020-05-27--Twitter Slaps ‘Fact Check’ Censor On Trump Tweet About ‘Rigged Election’

President Trump warned Tuesday that the election will be ‘ rigged ’ by Democrats using the pandemic to justify mail-in voting , and Twitter slapped a ‘ fact check ’ label on the post .
“ There is NO WAY ( ZERO ! )
that Mail-In Ballots will be anything less than substantially fraudulent , ” Trump tweeted .
“ This will be a Rigged Election .
No way !
” the president proclaimed .
Trump cited California ’ s governor Gavin Newsomo signing an executive order to ensure all voters will receive mail ballots for the election in November @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ballots will be forged and even illegally printed out and fraudulently signed , ” Trump urged .
Lawsuits have been filed in an attempt to block the move by The Republican National Committee , National Republican Congressional Committee , and the California Republican Party .
They contend that the move to an all mail in vote system is unconstitutional .
Trump declared that Democrats will use the opportunity to lobby people into giving them their votes .
“ That will be followed up with professionals telling all of these people , many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voting before , how , and for whom , to vote , ” he asserted .
Trump ’ s tweet was subsequently ‘ fact checked ’ by Twitter , with the company putting a warning label below it stating “ Get the facts about mail-in ballots , ” with a link to a page that states “ Trump falsely claimed that mail-in ballots would lead to ‘ a Rigged Election.
’ However , fact-checkers say there is no evidence that mail-in ballots are linked to voter fraud.
” Twitter told CNBC that Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ information about voting processes and have been labeled to provide additional context around mail-in ballots.
” While Twitter has routinely slapped ‘ fact checks ’ on other posts , this is the first time the company has used such a label on any Trump tweet .
Trump responded by declaring that Twitter is meddling in the election by “ saying my statement on Mail-In Ballots , which will lead to massive corruption and fraud , is incorrect.
” “ Twitter is completely stifling FREE SPEECH , and I , as President , will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” he added in another tweet .
Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale wedged in , charging that Twitter is trying to block Trump from reaching voters .
“ We always knew that Silicon Valley would pull out all the stops to obstruct and interfere with President Trump getting his message through to voters , ” Parscale urged .
“ Partnering with the biased fake news media ‘ fact checkers ’ is only a smoke screen Twitter is using to try to lend their obvious political tactics some false credibility , ” Parscale said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Trump campaign pulled all our advertising from Twitter months ago , and their clear political bias is one of them.
” Donald Trump Jr. also responded to the move by Twitter : The Twitter ‘ fact check ’ on Trump ’ s posts comes just days after MSNBC host Mika Brzezinski lobbied the company to take action against Trump , after he doubled down on tweets concerning her husband and co-host , ‘ psycho ’ Joe Scarborough :

President Trump warned Tuesday that the election will be ‘rigged’ by Democrats using the pandemic to justify mail-in voting, and Twitter slapped a ‘fact check’ label on the post.
“There is NO WAY (ZERO!) that Mail-In Ballots will be anything less than substantially fraudulent,” Trump tweeted.
“This will be a Rigged Election. No way!” the president proclaimed.
….living in the state, no matter who they are or how they got there, will get one. That will be followed up with professionals telling all of these people, many of whom have never even thought of voting before, how, and for whom, to vote. This will be a Rigged Election. No way! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 26, 2020
Trump cited California’s governor Gavin Newsomo signing an executive order to ensure all voters will receive mail ballots for the election in November.
“Mail boxes will be robbed, ballots will be forged and even illegally printed out and fraudulently signed,” Trump urged.
Lawsuits have been filed in an attempt to block the move by The Republican National Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee, and the California Republican Party.
They contend that the move to an all mail in vote system is unconstitutional.
Trump declared that Democrats will use the opportunity to lobby people into giving them their votes.
“That will be followed up with professionals telling all of these people, many of whom have never even thought of voting before, how, and for whom, to vote,” he asserted.
Trump’s tweet was subsequently ‘fact checked’ by Twitter, with the company putting a warning label below it stating “Get the facts about mail-in ballots,” with a link to a page that states “Trump falsely claimed that mail-in ballots would lead to ‘a Rigged Election.’ However, fact-checkers say there is no evidence that mail-in ballots are linked to voter fraud.”
Twitter told CNBC that Trump’s tweets “contain potentially misleading information about voting processes and have been labeled to provide additional context around mail-in ballots.”
While Twitter has routinely slapped ‘fact checks’ on other posts, this is the first time the company has used such a label on any Trump tweet.
Trump responded by declaring that Twitter is meddling in the election by “saying my statement on Mail-In Ballots, which will lead to massive corruption and fraud, is incorrect.”
“Twitter is completely stifling FREE SPEECH, and I, as President, will not allow it to happen!,” he added in another tweet.
….Twitter is completely stifling FREE SPEECH, and I, as President, will not allow it to happen! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 26, 2020
Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale wedged in, charging that Twitter is trying to block Trump from reaching voters.
“We always knew that Silicon Valley would pull out all the stops to obstruct and interfere with President Trump getting his message through to voters,” Parscale urged.
“Partnering with the biased fake news media ‘fact checkers’ is only a smoke screen Twitter is using to try to lend their obvious political tactics some false credibility,” Parscale said, adding “There are many reasons the Trump campaign pulled all our advertising from Twitter months ago, and their clear political bias is one of them.”
Partnering with biased fake news ‘fact checkers’ is a smoke screen to lend Twitter’s obvious political tactics false credibility. There are many reasons we pulled all our advertising from Twitter months ago, and clear political bias is one of them.https://t.co/oqgTq32KxS — Brad Parscale (@parscale) May 26, 2020
Donald Trump Jr. also responded to the move by Twitter:
So is @Twitter going to start censoring & fact-checking all the numerous blue check mark “journalists” & leftwing activists who falsely claimed that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government & that @realDonaldTrump is a “puppet” of Putin for the past 4 years? 🤔🧐 https://t.co/HqZ4mAMUvC — Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) May 26, 2020
The Twitter ‘fact check’ on Trump’s posts comes just days after MSNBC host Mika Brzezinski lobbied the company to take action against Trump, after he doubled down on tweets concerning her husband and co-host, ‘psycho’ Joe Scarborough:
.@jack At what point is @Twitter a part of this? TAKE DOWN TRUMP’s ACCOUNT— the world world be safer. Retweet if you agree — Mika Brzezinski (@morningmika) May 20, 2020


newswars--2020-05-27--‘Intro to a good dystopian film’: Amazon & media roasted online after TV stations aired segments scr

‘Intro to a good dystopian film’: Amazon & media roasted online after TV stations aired segments scripted by company’s PR team

Commenters online found it “ disturbing ” and dubious that several local US news channels ran stories praising Amazon… that were written by the company ’ s own staffers .
At least 11 local TV stations have run pro-Amazon news segments which closely follow scripts written and supplied by the retail giant ’ s PR people , Courier reported .
A montage of the anchors reading out nearly identically-structured stories has been circling on social media .
According to Courier , the news package was produced by Amazon spokesperson Todd Walker , and only one station – WTVG , an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ acknowledged that Walker was an Amazon employee , not a news reporter .
The segments focused on how Jeff Bezos ’ company is “ keeping its employees safe and healthy ” during the Covid-19 pandemic , and has spent $ 800 million on “ increased wages and overtime pay.
” Savanah and Harrison break down the recent big tech censorship on the President , and why Americans don ’ t just research things .
Oklahoma City ’ s KOCO 5 anchor Zach Rael previously revealed that Amazon ’ s PR team emailed him @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with “ a pre-edited news story and script to run in our shows.
” The journalist said that he declined the offer , suggesting that Amazon should allow news crew to visit its buildings “ with our own cameras ” instead .
Amazon ’ s spokesperson later confirmed to Mediaite that the footage was created to share “ an inside look ” into the company ’ s safety measures and was made for reporters who “ for a variety of reasons ” were unable to visit Amazon ’ s sites in person .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ news stations airing segments using scripts written by a large corporation is “ disturbing ” and “ absolutely absurd.
” “ This is depressing .
It ’ s just the TV version of native advertising , except without the ‘ sponsored content ’ label , ” one person tweeted .
Another said that it would be “ an insane breach of journalistic standards ” if the news stations failed to inform the viewers that the scripts came directly from Amazon .
Some pointed out that the stations airing the Amazon story are not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rather owned by different companies .
Others said the montage of anchors from different stations reading off a single script looks “ Quite Orwellian , ” like “ some dystopian stuff.
” “ This feels like an intro to a really good dystopian film , ” a YouTube commenter said .
According to media reports , Amazon sent out pre-edited scripts to news stations ahead of its shareholder meeting .
The e-commerce giant has faced backlash and scrutiny after employees went on strike in the US and made complaints demanding greater workplace protection @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Last month , a court in France ruled that the company failed to ensure the proper safety of its warehouse workers , and ordered Amazon ’ s operations in the country be limited to delivering only essential products such as food and medicine until it improves its workplace environment .
Amazon has denied mistreating its workers and insists that it has beefed up disease control measures to ensure safety and wellbeing .

Commenters online found it “disturbing” and dubious that several local US news channels ran stories praising Amazon… that were written by the company’s own staffers.
At least 11 local TV stations have run pro-Amazon news segments which closely follow scripts written and supplied by the retail giant’s PR people, Courier reported.
A montage of the anchors reading out nearly identically-structured stories has been circling on social media. According to Courier, the news package was produced by Amazon spokesperson Todd Walker, and only one station – WTVG, an ABC affiliate in Toledo, Ohio – acknowledged that Walker was an Amazon employee, not a news reporter.
WATCH: 11 Local TV Stations Pushed the Same Amazon-Scripted Segment https://t.co/XO3DbcQ8Im pic.twitter.com/hAmkXxQdrP — COURIER (@CourierNewsroom) May 26, 2020
The segments focused on how Jeff Bezos’ company is “keeping its employees safe and healthy” during the Covid-19 pandemic, and has spent $800 million on “increased wages and overtime pay.”
Savanah and Harrison break down the recent big tech censorship on the President, and why Americans don’t just research things.
Oklahoma City’s KOCO 5 anchor Zach Rael previously revealed that Amazon’s PR team emailed him footage from the company’s facilities with “a pre-edited news story and script to run in our shows.” The journalist said that he declined the offer, suggesting that Amazon should allow news crew to visit its buildings “with our own cameras” instead.
Just got an email from Amazon’s PR team with a pre-edited news story and script to run in our shows. They are selling this as giving our viewers an “inside look” at the company’s response to COVID-19. No. Let us go inside a fulfillment centers with our own cameras… pic.twitter.com/7mDk2xmf4O — Zach Rael (@KOCOZach) May 24, 2020
Amazon’s spokesperson later confirmed to Mediaite that the footage was created to share “an inside look” into the company’s safety measures and was made for reporters who “for a variety of reasons” were unable to visit Amazon’s sites in person.
Meanwhile, many commenters online said that news stations airing segments using scripts written by a large corporation is “disturbing” and “absolutely absurd.”
“This is depressing. It’s just the TV version of native advertising, except without the ‘sponsored content’ label,” one person tweeted.
Another said that it would be “an insane breach of journalistic standards” if the news stations failed to inform the viewers that the scripts came directly from Amazon.
Some pointed out that the stations airing the Amazon story are not affiliates of a single company, but rather owned by different companies.
Owners of these local stations: Nexstar Broadcasting
Entravision
NBCUniversal
Berkshire Hathaway
E. W. Scripps Company
Quincy Media
Gray Television
Thomas and DiBartolomeo Families This isn’t one owner running scripts through it’s affiliates. — Ventura 2020 (@AYATOMM_COM) May 26, 2020
Others said the montage of anchors from different stations reading off a single script looks “Quite Orwellian,” like“some dystopian stuff.”
“This feels like an intro to a really good dystopian film,” a YouTube commenter said.
According to media reports, Amazon sent out pre-edited scripts to news stations ahead of its shareholder meeting. The e-commerce giant has faced backlash and scrutiny after employees went on strike in the US and made complaints demanding greater workplace protection and better pay during the Covid-19 crisis.
Last month, a court in France ruled that the company failed to ensure the proper safety of its warehouse workers, and ordered Amazon’s operations in the country be limited to delivering only essential products such as food and medicine until it improves its workplace environment.
Amazon has denied mistreating its workers and insists that it has beefed up disease control measures to ensure safety and wellbeing.