newswars--2020-04-27--“China Did A Lot Of Things Right”: Bill Gates Defends CCP, Slams America Over Handling Of Coronaviru

“China Did A Lot Of Things Right”: Bill Gates Defends CCP, Slams America Over Handling Of Coronavirus

Bill Gates vehemently defended China ’ s initial response to the coronavirus outbreak on Sunday , telling CNN ’ s Fareed Zakaria that the communist country – which silenced whistleblowers and lied about transmissibility – “ did a lot of things right.
” “ How would you respond to the charge that hte Chinese covered this up .
They ’ ve essentially deceived the rest of the world , and as a result , they should be held in some way responsible for this ?
” asked Zakaria .
To which Gates responded : “ Well , I don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thing because it doesn ’ t affect how we act today .
You know , China did a lot of things right .
At the beginning , like any country where a virus first shows up , they can look back and say that they missed some things , ” Gates said , adding “ Some countries did respond very quickly and get their testing in place , and they avoided the incredible economic pain – and it ’ s sad that even the US that you would have expected to do this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but it ’ s not time to talk about that.
” Gates then suggested that this is the time “ to take the great science we have , the fact that we ’ re in this together , fix testing and treatments and get that vaccine , and minimize the trillions in dollars and many things that you can ’ t even dimensionalize in economic terms that are awful about the situation that we ’ re in .
“ That ’ s a distraction , ” Gates added , regarding placing the blame @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s a lot of incorrect and unfair things said.
” We wonder why Bill Gates – one of the largest donors to the World Health Organization – is similarly defending China , which is also one of the WHO ’ s largest contributors .
Thad returns to the War Room !
Join him and other patriots this Saturday at 1pm as they protest in front of the “ Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation ” in Seattle , Washington !

Bill Gates vehemently defended China’s initial response to the coronavirus outbreak on Sunday, telling CNN’s Fareed Zakaria that the communist country – which silenced whistleblowers and lied about transmissibility – “did a lot of things right.”
“How would you respond to the charge that hte Chinese covered this up. They’ve essentially deceived the rest of the world, and as a result, they should be held in some way responsible for this?” asked Zakaria.
To which Gates responded: “Well, I don’t think that’s a timely thing because it doesn’t affect how we act today. You know, China did a lot of things right. At the beginning, like any country where a virus first shows up, they can look back and say that they missed some things,” Gates said, adding “Some countries did respond very quickly and get their testing in place, and they avoided the incredible economic pain – and it’s sad that even the US that you would have expected to do this well, did it particularly poorly – but it’s not time to talk about that.”
Gates then suggested that this is the time “to take the great science we have, the fact that we’re in this together, fix testing and treatments and get that vaccine, and minimize the trillions in dollars and many things that you can’t even dimensionalize in economic terms that are awful about the situation that we’re in.
“That’s a distraction,” Gates added, regarding placing the blame on China. “I think there’s a lot of incorrect and unfair things said.”
Watch:
Bill Gates claims that criticisms of how China lied and covered up the coronavirus is a “distraction”: “China did a lot of things right at the beginning … they avoided the incredible economic pain … I think there’s a lot of incorrect and unfair things said” This is all a lie pic.twitter.com/RlbwV0fUcA — Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) April 26, 2020
We wonder why Bill Gates – one of the largest donors to the World Health Organization – is similarly defending China, which is also one of the WHO’s largest contributors.
Thad returns to the War Room! Join him and other patriots this Saturday at 1pm as they protest in front of the “Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation” in Seattle, Washington!


newswars--2020-04-27--The Globalist Guide To Crushing The United States

If you are a globalist technocrat , media stooge , or even a low-level , power-mad politician reveling in the @ @ @ @ @ chaos , what can you do to assist in the demise of an entire country @ @ @ @ @ the Chinese Controlavirus ?

If you are a globalist technocrat, media stooge, or even a low-level, power-mad politician reveling in the prospect of order out of chaos, what can you do to assist in the demise of an entire country on forced lockdown due to the Chinese Controlavirus?


newswars--2020-04-27--“World Should Have Listened to WHO” Claims Tedros

Despite its complicity in helping China cover-up the severity of the coronavirus pandemic , the head of the World Health Organization today claimed “ the world should have listened ” to the WHO .
Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told a virtual press briefing that the WHO told the world the COVID-19 outbreak constituted a “ Public Health Emergency of International Concern ” on January 30 , when there were only 82 cases registered outside China “ The world should have listened to WHO then carefully , ” Ghebreyesus asserted .
The sheer inaccuracy of these statements would be funny if not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ due to the WHO ’ s mishandling of the outbreak .
At every step of the way , the WHO praised China ’ s actions on coronavirus , despite widespread evidence that the virus was leaked from a lab , that Beijing lied about the true fatality numbers and had known about coronavirus at least weeks before it informed the WHO .
On January 14th , the WHO amplified Chinese government propaganda that there had been no “ human to human transmission ” of COVID-19 , despite this having actually occurred back in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fox News that the virus was leaked from a lab in Wuhan , this represented the “ costliest government coverup of all time ” and “ the World Health Organization ( WHO ) was complicit from the beginning in helping China cover its tracks.
” The WHO also blocked doctors from urging countries to impose border controls to stop the spread of coronavirus and repeatedly told countries not to close borders , despite this being an effective way of controlling the spread of the virus .
Right up until the end of February @ @ @ @ @ @ @ against the application of travel or trade restrictions to countries experiencing COVID-19 outbreaks , ” despite the rapid spread of the disease .
A Mount Sinai study found that New York City ’ s record-high coronavirus cases and deaths were “ predominately ” due to travel from Europe , meaning that many more lives could have been saved if borders had been closed down earlier .
But instead , the WHO insisted that maintaining the globalist principle of the international traffic of people was more important than stopping a global pandemic .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ profile Chinese people in order to avoid “ stigmatization , ” something that almost certainly led to a lack of screenings of Chinese people passing through airports .
Given this history , more lives would have been saved if countries had in fact listened to the World Health Organization a lot less .
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever .
It is CRUCIAL that you support me .
Please sign up for the free newsletter here .
Donate to me on SubscribeStar here @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown .

Despite its complicity in helping China cover-up the severity of the coronavirus pandemic, the head of the World Health Organization today claimed “the world should have listened” to the WHO.
Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told a virtual press briefing that the WHO told the world the COVID-19 outbreak constituted a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern” on January 30, when there were only 82 cases registered outside China
“The world should have listened to WHO then carefully,” Ghebreyesus asserted.
The sheer inaccuracy of these statements would be funny if not for the fact that lives were lost due to the WHO’s mishandling of the outbreak.
At every step of the way, the WHO praised China’s actions on coronavirus, despite widespread evidence that the virus was leaked from a lab, that Beijing lied about the true fatality numbers and had known about coronavirus at least weeks before it informed the WHO.
On January 14th, the WHO amplified Chinese government propaganda that there had been no “human to human transmission” of COVID-19, despite this having actually occurred back in November.
According to sources who told Fox News that the virus was leaked from a lab in Wuhan, this represented the “costliest government coverup of all time” and “the World Health Organization (WHO) was complicit from the beginning in helping China cover its tracks.”
The WHO also blocked doctors from urging countries to impose border controls to stop the spread of coronavirus and repeatedly told countries not to close borders, despite this being an effective way of controlling the spread of the virus.
Right up until the end of February, the WHO continued “to advise against the application of travel or trade restrictions to countries experiencing COVID-19 outbreaks,” despite the rapid spread of the disease.
A Mount Sinai study found that New York City’s record-high coronavirus cases and deaths were “predominately” due to travel from Europe, meaning that many more lives could have been saved if borders had been closed down earlier.
But instead, the WHO insisted that maintaining the globalist principle of the international traffic of people was more important than stopping a global pandemic.
The organization also repeatedly told countries not to profile Chinese people in order to avoid “stigmatization,” something that almost certainly led to a lack of screenings of Chinese people passing through airports.
Given this history, more lives would have been saved if countries had in fact listened to the World Health Organization a lot less.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me.
Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-04-27--The Fed Has Gone Nuts. And It Can Get Worse

With its $ 700 billion bond-buying expansion in response to the COVID crisis , the Federal Reserve has thrust itself into the limelight .
Like a sixteen-year-old with a credit card , the Fed is salivating over what money-printing powers it shall seize next .
How is the prudent investor to respond ?
First , what the Fed ’ s already done : pushed interest rates to zero and expanded into “ unlimited ” buying of assets , now reaching to corporate bonds and local government bonds .
These bring the same concerns we had in 2008 : trillions in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of current savers , along with the risk of “ moral hazard ” where government covers the losses for corporate , and government , irresponsibility .
What ’ s more concerning is what the Fed might do next .
Proposals are floating up for four very corrosive measures : negative interest rates ; directly subsidizing bonds ; writing Fed checks for corporate equity or for a universal basic income up to $ 72,000 per year ; and letting poor countries effectively print their own US dollars .
All four may be bonkers , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because they enjoy support not just from the redistributionist left , but also “ business conservatives ” happy to raid our future to make their pain stop .
Why bonkers ?
Even champions concede that negative rates would need compulsory rules such as declaring worthless all serial numbers ending in zero , or forcing Americans to use “ crypto ” dollars that automatically devalue .
Subsidizing bonds by targeting interest rates would permanently suck capital from the private sector into unlimited local government spending .
Buying corporate equity risks turning every business in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ road Japan is already well along .
Meanwhile , printing up $ 72,000 per family per year , or letting Guatemala print US dollars at will , is the kind of thing one expects from crash-the-dollar Bitcoiners , not from Congress and central bankers .
The common thread of all these proposals is to triple down on the money printing and gamble covering of 2008—spreading unlimited dollars to , especially , big business and governments , the price of it all to be paid by those unwise enough to either not work for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ good lobbyist .
Alas , the joy of all that generosity is immediate but the pain is paid over decades , as savers are diluted by the new trillions .
This fear was muted in 2008 , because the ensuing recession lasted so long that new money was largely saved .
If , as some expect , COVID leads to a V-shaped recovery , that inflation may come with a vengeance this time .
Beyond inflation , this level of spending risks permanent distortions in capital markets—a permanent siphon of trillions from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and politically favored sectors .
All that new money artificially props up prices , and the longer they remain propped up , the longer capital flows towards the prop .
Even after the crisis , no politician , much less Trump , will want to be the guy who takes away the punch bowl .
And this is already becoming a supersized punch bowl .
We can only imagine the pressure to keep propping , say , local government borrowers , again becoming a permanent siphon on the productive economy .
Historically pandemics @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
After all , as Austrian theory emphasizes , an economy is made of entrepreneurs forever seeking new desires to satisfy .
This process does not stop just because a disease temporarily shutters businesses .
There is a hit to wealth , yes , but the fundamental workings of an economy are not affected by pandemics any more than by an earthquake or a bad winter .
That said , what can affect the fundamental workings of an economy is radical policies that impose new burdens on producers , whether in the form @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pay for a raft of handouts .
We can see the difference in America ’ s last two pandemics , in 1957 and 1968 .
When policy was prudent , in 1957 , recovery was very fast .
When policy was interventionist , as in 1968 , the pain lasted for a generation , through the 1970s and into the 1980s .
As for inflation , Austrian models of money demand suggest little risk during the recession itself , as excess money is saved , but a raised risk if we do get @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spent .
And , of course , stagflation becomes a real possibility if the government follows the 1970s playbook of economy-wrecking reforms while pumping out all that fresh cash .
It ’ s still possible for us to get out of this relatively economically intact , but only if we reign in the empire-builders in Washington now .

With its $700 billion bond-buying expansion in response to the COVID crisis, the Federal Reserve has thrust itself into the limelight.
Like a sixteen-year-old with a credit card, the Fed is salivating over what money-printing powers it shall seize next. How is the prudent investor to respond?
First, what the Fed’s already done: pushed interest rates to zero and expanded into “unlimited” buying of assets, now reaching to corporate bonds and local government bonds. These bring the same concerns we had in 2008: trillions in new money to dilute the spending power of current savers, along with the risk of “moral hazard” where government covers the losses for corporate, and government, irresponsibility.
What’s more concerning is what the Fed might do next. Proposals are floating up for four very corrosive measures: negative interest rates; directly subsidizing bonds; writing Fed checks for corporate equity or for a universal basic income up to $72,000 per year; and letting poor countries effectively print their own US dollars.
All four may be bonkers, but they carry significant political risk, because they enjoy support not just from the redistributionist left, but also “business conservatives” happy to raid our future to make their pain stop.
Why bonkers? Even champions concede that negative rates would need compulsory rules such as declaring worthless all serial numbers ending in zero, or forcing Americans to use “crypto” dollars that automatically devalue. Subsidizing bonds by targeting interest rates would permanently suck capital from the private sector into unlimited local government spending. Buying corporate equity risks turning every business in America into a government-run entity, a road Japan is already well along. Meanwhile, printing up $72,000 per family per year, or letting Guatemala print US dollars at will, is the kind of thing one expects from crash-the-dollar Bitcoiners, not from Congress and central bankers.
The common thread of all these proposals is to triple down on the money printing and gamble covering of 2008—spreading unlimited dollars to, especially, big business and governments, the price of it all to be paid by those unwise enough to either not work for the government or to not have a good lobbyist.
Alas, the joy of all that generosity is immediate but the pain is paid over decades, as savers are diluted by the new trillions. This fear was muted in 2008, because the ensuing recession lasted so long that new money was largely saved. If, as some expect, COVID leads to a V-shaped recovery, that inflation may come with a vengeance this time.
Beyond inflation, this level of spending risks permanent distortions in capital markets—a permanent siphon of trillions from the private sectors and individuals to the government and politically favored sectors. All that new money artificially props up prices, and the longer they remain propped up, the longer capital flows towards the prop. Even after the crisis, no politician, much less Trump, will want to be the guy who takes away the punch bowl.
And this is already becoming a supersized punch bowl. We can only imagine the pressure to keep propping, say, local government borrowers, again becoming a permanent siphon on the productive economy.
Historically pandemics have a limited impact on long-term growth. After all, as Austrian theory emphasizes, an economy is made of entrepreneurs forever seeking new desires to satisfy. This process does not stop just because a disease temporarily shutters businesses. There is a hit to wealth, yes, but the fundamental workings of an economy are not affected by pandemics any more than by an earthquake or a bad winter.
That said, what can affect the fundamental workings of an economy is radical policies that impose new burdens on producers, whether in the form of new regulations or new taxes to pay for a raft of handouts. We can see the difference in America’s last two pandemics, in 1957 and 1968. When policy was prudent, in 1957, recovery was very fast. When policy was interventionist, as in 1968, the pain lasted for a generation, through the 1970s and into the 1980s.
As for inflation, Austrian models of money demand suggest little risk during the recession itself, as excess money is saved, but a raised risk if we do get that V-shaped recovery and cash savings are spent. And, of course, stagflation becomes a real possibility if the government follows the 1970s playbook of economy-wrecking reforms while pumping out all that fresh cash.
It’s still possible for us to get out of this relatively economically intact, but only if we reign in the empire-builders in Washington now.


newswars--2020-04-27--We Will Not Submit To The NWO Chimera

We Will Not Submit To The NWO Chimera

For years , Alex Jones has been preparing patriotic listeners for the day that has finally arrived .
And now @ @ @ @ @ a growing awakening of We The People to take the Globalist system head-on .
As @ @ @ @ @ , over the same period of time , Bill Gates was nursing his deception , @ @ @ @ @ the building with only hell to pay .
Do not be a victim of the @ @ @ @ @ We must be confident and fully focused in our resolve .

For years, Alex Jones has been preparing patriotic listeners for the day that has finally arrived.
And now, it is up to a growing awakening of We The People to take the Globalist system head-on.
As Alex brought you the truth, over the same period of time, Bill Gates was nursing his deception, and that rollout has left the building with only hell to pay.
Do not be a victim of the Chinese Century Chimera virus.
We must be confident and fully focused in our resolve.