newswars--2020-06-03--China Furious After UK Considers Offering Citizenship To 3 Million Hong Kong Residents

U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson pledged on Wednesday to overhaul immigration rules and said Britain is considering providing a route to British citizenship for nearly three million Hong Kong residents in response to Beijing ’ s move to impose a far-reaching security law .
Many fear that will dismantle the city ’ s political freedoms and which will criminalize broadly worded offenses such as sedition , subversion and foreign interference .
Beijing ’ s decision to bypass Hong Kong ’ s legislature has been heavily criticized by the British government , which signed an agreement in 1984 to ensure that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ except in matters such as defense .
The unprecedented move , which Johnson said he would implement when China formally enacts the security law , could emerge as among the most significant ramifications of Beijing ’ s effort to undercut Hong Kong ’ s freedoms and bring the city more closely under Communist Party rule .
It would potentially grant British residency and working rights to up to 40 % of Hong Kong ’ s population , raising the specter of a brain drain from the Asian financial center .
“ Many people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ life—which China pledged to uphold—is under threat , ” Johnson wrote in an op-ed that appeared Wednesday in the Times of London newspaper and Hong Kong ’ s South China Morning Post .
“ If China proceeds to justify their fears , then Britain could not in good conscience shrug our shoulders and walk away.
” Johnson ’ s vow comes as the United States , Canada , Australia and others face pressure from lawmakers and human rights groups to offer residency to Hong Kong people fleeing deteriorating political circumstances in the former @ @ @ @ @ @ @ high degree of autonomy under the terms of its 1997 handover to China .
Johnson wrote that his government would allow holders of British National ( Overseas ) , or BNO , passports to come to Britain for a renewable period of 12 months and gain the right to work .
The move “ could place them on a route to citizenship , ” he said .
These passports , a holdover from British rule issued to people born before 1997 , currently allow holders to stay in Britain for six months but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
About 350,000 of Hong Kong ’ s 7.5 million residents hold British National Overseas passports , to which people who were citizens of Hong Kong before Britain returned the city to Chinese rule in 1997 are entitled.Johnson said a further 2.5 million people are eligible to apply for them , adding up to about 40 % of Hong Kong ’ s population .
Holders of those passports can visit the U.K. for a period of six months but currently don ’ t have the automatic right to live or work in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not clear exactly how immigration laws would be changed or if the U.K. would fully open its doors to the 2.8 million Hong Kong residents potentially eligible for a British National Overseas passport .
It isn ’ t currently permitted to hold a British National Overseas passport while holding the nationality of another country .
British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab said on Tuesday that the U.K. had discussed with allies including Australia , Canada and the U.S. the possibility of “ burden sharing if we see a mass exodus from Hong Kong.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the discussions .
China , naturally , was not happy with this turn of events .
In response to the BoJo op-ed , China ’ s Foreign Ministry said Wednesday that Britain has no jurisdiction over Hong Kong .
Britain must “ step back from the brink ” and “ stop interfering in Hong Kong ’ s affairs and China ’ s internal affairs , ” spokesman Zhao Lijian told reporters .
Hong Kong ’ s Office of the Commissioner of China ’ s Ministry of Foreign Ministry added that “ the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ does it have power of governing or “ supervision ” over Hong Kong after the region ’ s return to China ” adding that “ no terms in the Sino-British Joint Declaration grant rights to U.K. to interfere in Hong Kong affairs ” and that “ any foreign nations including the U.K. should not use the Joint Declaration as an excuse to meddle in Hong Kong affairs : statement.
” Needless to say , China has been especially critical with the proposal since Britain first floated the idea last week , and has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1984 agreement with Britain .
It has said it reserved the right to take unspecified “ corresponding action.
” Asked about the British proposal on Wednesday , Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam said some foreign governments had adopted “ blatant double standards ” regarding China ’ s security law .
Comment on the proposal , Rabobank ’ s Michael Every was laconic , and warned that this is just the last geopolitical flashpoint that markets are clearly ignoring : the UK is lobbying the 5-eyes Anglo group to allow millions of Hong @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will take 2.9m ) , the US , Canada , Australia and New Zealand : what does that suggest about the outlook ?
As the former colonial ruler , London was a signatory to the Sino-British Joint Declaration in which China agreed to preserve Hong Kong ’ s political freedoms and way of life until 2047 .

U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson pledged on Wednesday to overhaul immigration rules and said Britain is considering providing a route to British citizenship for nearly three million Hong Kong residents in response to Beijing’s move to impose a far-reaching security law.
Many fear that will dismantle the city’s political freedoms and which will criminalize broadly worded offenses such as sedition, subversion and foreign interference.
Beijing’s decision to bypass Hong Kong’s legislature has been heavily criticized by the British government, which signed an agreement in 1984 to ensure that Hong Kong remains autonomous from Beijing, except in matters such as defense.
The unprecedented move, which Johnson said he would implement when China formally enacts the security law, could emerge as among the most significant ramifications of Beijing’s effort to undercut Hong Kong’s freedoms and bring the city more closely under Communist Party rule. It would potentially grant British residency and working rights to up to 40% of Hong Kong’s population, raising the specter of a brain drain from the Asian financial center.
“Many people in Hong Kong fear their way of life—which China pledged to uphold—is under threat,” Johnson wrote in an op-ed that appeared Wednesday in the Times of London newspaper and Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post. “If China proceeds to justify their fears, then Britain could not in good conscience shrug our shoulders and walk away.”
Johnson’s vow comes as the United States, Canada, Australia and others face pressure from lawmakers and human rights groups to offer residency to Hong Kong people fleeing deteriorating political circumstances in the former British colony, which was promised a high degree of autonomy under the terms of its 1997 handover to China.
Johnson wrote that his government would allow holders of British National (Overseas), or BNO, passports to come to Britain for a renewable period of 12 months and gain the right to work. The move “could place them on a route to citizenship,” he said.
These passports, a holdover from British rule issued to people born before 1997, currently allow holders to stay in Britain for six months but do not afford work rights or residency. About 350,000 of Hong Kong’s 7.5 million residents hold British National Overseas passports, to which people who were citizens of Hong Kong before Britain returned the city to Chinese rule in 1997 are entitled.Johnson said a further 2.5 million people are eligible to apply for them, adding up to about 40% of Hong Kong’s population. Holders of those passports can visit the U.K. for a period of six months but currently don’t have the automatic right to live or work in the country.
That said, it is not clear exactly how immigration laws would be changed or if the U.K. would fully open its doors to the 2.8 million Hong Kong residents potentially eligible for a British National Overseas passport. It isn’t currently permitted to hold a British National Overseas passport while holding the nationality of another country. British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab said on Tuesday that the U.K. had discussed with allies including Australia, Canada and the U.S. the possibility of “burden sharing if we see a mass exodus from Hong Kong.” He didn’t indicate any outcome of the discussions.
China, naturally, was not happy with this turn of events.
In response to the BoJo op-ed, China’s Foreign Ministry said Wednesday that Britain has no jurisdiction over Hong Kong. Britain must “step back from the brink” and “stop interfering in Hong Kong’s affairs and China’s internal affairs,” spokesman Zhao Lijian told reporters.
Hong Kong’s Office of the Commissioner of China’s Ministry of Foreign Ministry added that “the U.K. has no sovereignty power, nor does it have power of governing or “supervision” over Hong Kong after the region’s return to China” adding that “no terms in the Sino-British Joint Declaration grant rights to U.K. to interfere in Hong Kong affairs” and that “any foreign nations including the U.K. should not use the Joint Declaration as an excuse to meddle in Hong Kong affairs: statement.”
Needless to say, China has been especially critical with the proposal since Britain first floated the idea last week, and has denied that the security law breached the 1984 agreement with Britain. It has said it reserved the right to take unspecified “corresponding action.”
Asked about the British proposal on Wednesday, Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam said some foreign governments had adopted “blatant double standards” regarding China’s security law.
Comment on the proposal, Rabobank’s Michael Every was laconic, and warned that this is just the last geopolitical flashpoint that markets are clearly ignoring:
the UK is lobbying the 5-eyes Anglo group to allow millions of Hong Kongers to leave for Britain (who will take 2.9m), the US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand: what does that suggest about the outlook?
As the former colonial ruler, London was a signatory to the Sino-British Joint Declaration in which China agreed to preserve Hong Kong’s political freedoms and way of life until 2047.


newswars--2020-06-03--Man “Sickest in His Life” After Taking Experimental Vaccine

You know Ian Haydon from many appearances on CNN and other networks celebrating his heroic act of volunteering to test Moderna ’ s experimental COVID vaccine .
The sun has now set on Haydon ’ s television career .
He is no longer useful to the Pharmedia narratives that all vaccines are always safe for all people , that Moderna ’ s business partners , Tony Fauci and Bill Gates , were justified in skipping animal studies and that Moderna ’ s vaccine will soon rescue us from the Pandemic .
Ian Haydon is now an embarrassment to Fauci , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He will therefore vanish into the censorship twilight .
Moderna chose Haydon for the study because of his robust good health .
He was among the 15 volunteers in the high dose group .
Within 45 days , three of these—a shocking 20 % —experienced “ serious ” adverse events according to Moderna ’ s press release meaning they required hospitalization or medical intervention .
Less than 12 hours after vaccination , Hayden suffered muscle aches , vomiting , spiked a 103.2 degree fever and lost consciousness .
His girlfriend caught him as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ instructed Haydon to call 911 and described him as being the “ sickest in his life ” .
Moderna let Haydon believe the illness was just a sad coincidence unrelated to the jab .
Moderna never told Haydon he was suffering an Adverse Event .
“ Moderna ’ s press release was the first I learned of the 3 AEs in the high dose group.
” Haydon confessed last week on Twitter .
“ Later a study doc confirmed that what happened to me was an AE.
” While hiding this truth , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to deceive the public and its shareholders by declaring Moderna ’ s COVID vaccine trials a smashing success .
On May 7 , Haydon told Sanjay Gupta about his reactions in a pre-interview .
The two men agreed to keep this bad news secret when he went on air .
This corrupt deal bespeaks the pathetic state of journalism at CNN .
Fauci and Gates are proceeding with their plan to funnel half a billion taxpayer dollars into their reckless vanity project to create 30 million doses by November and two billion within @ @ @ @ @ @ @ insider ) manufactured in the US and Switzerland .
The White House Covid-19 response team is made up of Big Pharma and Bill Gates operatives !

You know Ian Haydon from many appearances on CNN and other networks celebrating his heroic act of volunteering to test Moderna’s experimental COVID vaccine.
The sun has now set on Haydon’s television career. He is no longer useful to the Pharmedia narratives that all vaccines are always safe for all people, that Moderna’s business partners, Tony Fauci and Bill Gates, were justified in skipping animal studies and that Moderna’s vaccine will soon rescue us from the Pandemic.
Ian Haydon is now an embarrassment to Fauci, Gates, and their CNN cheerleaders. He will therefore vanish into the censorship twilight.
Moderna chose Haydon for the study because of his robust good health. He was among the 15 volunteers in the high dose group. Within 45 days, three of these—a shocking 20%—experienced “serious” adverse events according to Moderna’s press release meaning they required hospitalization or medical intervention.
Alex Jones exposes Bill Gates’ depopulation agenda!
Less than 12 hours after vaccination, Hayden suffered muscle aches, vomiting, spiked a 103.2 degree fever and lost consciousness. His girlfriend caught him as he fell. His Moderna trial supervisor instructed Haydon to call 911 and described him as being the “sickest in his life”. Moderna let Haydon believe the illness was just a sad coincidence unrelated to the jab. Moderna never told Haydon he was suffering an Adverse Event.
“Moderna’s press release was the first I learned of the 3 AEs in the high dose group.” Haydon confessed last week on Twitter. “Later a study doc confirmed that what happened to me was an AE.” While hiding this truth, Moderna encouraged Haydon to appear on TV to deceive the public and its shareholders by declaring Moderna’s COVID vaccine trials a smashing success.
On May 7, Haydon told Sanjay Gupta about his reactions in a pre-interview. The two men agreed to keep this bad news secret when he went on air. This corrupt deal bespeaks the pathetic state of journalism at CNN.
Fauci and Gates are proceeding with their plan to funnel half a billion taxpayer dollars into their reckless vanity project to create 30 million doses by November and two billion within a year (personal interview, Moderna insider) manufactured in the US and Switzerland.
The White House Covid-19 response team is made up of Big Pharma and Bill Gates operatives!


newswars--2020-06-03--China Escalates War on Cash With Rollout of Digital Currency

The Chinese government has launched a pilot program for a digital version of the yuan .
The virtual currency ups the ante in the war on cash and creates the potential for the government to track and even control consumer spending .
It also raises some concern that the Chinese could threaten dollar-dominance .
The digital currency is nothing more than a virtual banknote or coin that exists in a digital wallet on your smartphone instead of a billfold or a purse .
The value of the digital currency is backed by the state , just like traditional fiat currency @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with a limited rollout in the cities of Shenzhen , Suzhou , Chengdu , and Xiong ’ an .
According to Bloomberg , some of the money was distributed in the form of transport subsidies paid to individuals in Suzhou .
Even with the limited rollout , Chinese digital currency is still a long way from full adoption .
People ’ s Bank of China governor Yi Gang said recently said , “ There ’ s no timetable for an official launch.
” Why is China so eager to roll out digital yuan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ payments .
As Bloomberg put it , digital currency “ offers China ’ s authorities a degree of control never possible with physical money.
” Specifically , a digital currency might allow the Chinese government to more closely monitor mobile app purchases , accounting for about 16 % of the country ’ s GDP .
Bloomberg describes just how much control a digital currency could give Chinese officials .
“ The PBOC has also indicated that it could put limits on the sizes of some transactions , or even require an appointment to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whether payments could be linked to the emerging social-credit system , wherein citizens with exemplary behavior are ‘ whitelisted ’ for privileges , while those with criminal and other infractions find themselves left out .
‘ China ’ s goal is not to make payments more convenient but to replace cash , so it can keep closer tabs on people than it already does , ’ argues Aaron Brown , a crypto investor who writes for Bloomberg Opinion.
” Governments around the world have quietly waged a war on cash for years .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ a creepy paper offering governments suggestions on how to move toward a cashless society even in the face of strong public opposition .
Governments and central bankers claim moving toward a cashless society will help prevent crime and will boost convenience for the average citizen .
But the real motivation behind the war on cash is control over you .
We got a first-hand look at what happens when governments restrict access to cash when India plunged into a cash crisis after the country ’ s government enacted a policy of demonetization in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to shrug off China ’ s experimentation with digital currency as something going on “ over there , ” but it US policymakers like the idea too .
In fact , they have already toyed with the idea of a digital dollar .
A Democratic proposal for stimulus payments in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic featured digital currency deposited into digital wallets .
Some officials admitted it would potentially allow the government to control how the money was spent .
There is also concern that a Chinese digital currency could eventually threaten @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could limit America ’ s ability to weaponize the dollar .
Aditi Kumar and Eric Rosenbach of the Harvard Kennedy School wrote an article published by Foreign Affairs warning that the digital yuan could weaken the US geopolitically .
“ The advent of digital currencies will degrade the efficacy of US sanctions , limiting the country ’ s options to respond to national security threats from Iran , North Korea , Russia , and others .
It will also hamper the ability of US authorities to track illicit financial flows .
And China @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of its digital yuan and strong electronic-payment platforms ( such as Alipay and WeChat ) to expand its influence and reinforce its capacity for economic coercion in Africa , the Middle East , and Southeast Asia.
” Widespread adoption of the Chinese currency could even threaten the dollar ’ s position as the reserve currency .
With the Federal Reserve running the dollar printing press at full speed and the US government expanding the national debt into the stratosphere , there are renewed calls for a currency to replace the dollar as the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Henry Paulson wrote that those fears are overblown and that the Chinese threat to the dollar is “ not a serious concern.
” He argues that even if a digital yuan proves to be highly mobile around the world , the dollar remains widely trusted .
More significantly , oil and other key commodities are still priced dollars .
Of course , there is no guarantee that will last forever .
In late 2017 , China announced the launch of a gold-backed , yuan-denominated oil futures contract .
The move potentially creates a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dollar-denominated benchmarks by trading in yuan .
The contracts will be priced in yuan , but convertible to gold .
There is also a strong appetite for a secure international payment system outside of the dollar-dominated SWIFT system .
Matthew Graham , chief executive officer of Sino Global Capital , a Beijing-based consultant on blockchain , told Bloomberg China may enjoy some advantage by being the first country to roll out a digital currency .
It ’ s very possible that other countries adopt the China framework , and then a first-mover advantage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This is the best-case scenario for China.
” Alex Jones brings out the documents he exposed two years ago detailing an organized effort to create racial division and civil unrest in America funded by George Soros .

The Chinese government has launched a pilot program for a digital version of the yuan.
The virtual currency ups the ante in the war on cash and creates the potential for the government to track and even control consumer spending. It also raises some concern that the Chinese could threaten dollar-dominance.
The digital currency is nothing more than a virtual banknote or coin that exists in a digital wallet on your smartphone instead of a billfold or a purse. The value of the digital currency is backed by the state, just like traditional fiat currency.
The program kicked off in April with a limited rollout in the cities of Shenzhen, Suzhou, Chengdu, and Xiong’an. According to Bloomberg, some of the money was distributed in the form of transport subsidies paid to individuals in Suzhou.
Even with the limited rollout, Chinese digital currency is still a long way from full adoption. People’s Bank of China governor Yi Gang said recently said, “There’s no timetable for an official launch.”
Why is China so eager to roll out digital yuan?
Ultimately, it’s all about control.
The government can easily track digital payments. As Bloomberg put it, digital currency “offers China’s authorities a degree of control never possible with physical money.” Specifically, a digital currency might allow the Chinese government to more closely monitor mobile app purchases, accounting for about 16% of the country’s GDP. Bloomberg describes just how much control a digital currency could give Chinese officials.
“The PBOC has also indicated that it could put limits on the sizes of some transactions, or even require an appointment to make large ones. Some observers wonder whether payments could be linked to the emerging social-credit system, wherein citizens with exemplary behavior are ‘whitelisted’ for privileges, while those with criminal and other infractions find themselves left out. ‘China’s goal is not to make payments more convenient but to replace cash, so it can keep closer tabs on people than it already does,’ argues Aaron Brown, a crypto investor who writes for Bloomberg Opinion.”
Governments around the world have quietly waged a war on cash for years. Back in 2017, the IMF published a creepy paper offering governments suggestions on how to move toward a cashless society even in the face of strong public opposition. Governments and central bankers claim moving toward a cashless society will help prevent crime and will boost convenience for the average citizen. But the real motivation behind the war on cash is control over you. We got a first-hand look at what happens when governments restrict access to cash when India plunged into a cash crisis after the country’s government enacted a policy of demonetization in November 2016.
It’s easy to shrug off China’s experimentation with digital currency as something going on “over there,” but it US policymakers like the idea too. In fact, they have already toyed with the idea of a digital dollar. A Democratic proposal for stimulus payments in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic featured digital currency deposited into digital wallets. Some officials admitted it would potentially allow the government to control how the money was spent.
There is also concern that a Chinese digital currency could eventually threaten dollar-dominance. If nothing else, it could limit America’s ability to weaponize the dollar.
Aditi Kumar and Eric Rosenbach of the Harvard Kennedy School wrote an article published by Foreign Affairs warning that the digital yuan could weaken the US geopolitically.
“The advent of digital currencies will degrade the efficacy of US sanctions, limiting the country’s options to respond to national security threats from Iran, North Korea, Russia, and others. It will also hamper the ability of US authorities to track illicit financial flows. And China, meanwhile, will use the combination of its digital yuan and strong electronic-payment platforms (such as Alipay and WeChat) to expand its influence and reinforce its capacity for economic coercion in Africa, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia.”
Widespread adoption of the Chinese currency could even threaten the dollar’s position as the reserve currency. With the Federal Reserve running the dollar printing press at full speed and the US government expanding the national debt into the stratosphere, there are renewed calls for a currency to replace the dollar as the world reserve.
But former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson wrote that those fears are overblown and that the Chinese threat to the dollar is “not a serious concern.” He argues that even if a digital yuan proves to be highly mobile around the world, the dollar remains widely trusted. More significantly, oil and other key commodities are still priced dollars.
Of course, there is no guarantee that will last forever. In late 2017, China announced the launch of a gold-backed, yuan-denominated oil futures contract. The move potentially creates a way for oil exporters to circumvent US dollar-denominated benchmarks by trading in yuan. The contracts will be priced in yuan, but convertible to gold.
There is also a strong appetite for a secure international payment system outside of the dollar-dominated SWIFT system. Matthew Graham, chief executive officer of Sino Global Capital, a Beijing-based consultant on blockchain, told Bloomberg China may enjoy some advantage by being the first country to roll out a digital currency.
It’s very possible that other countries adopt the China framework, and then a first-mover advantage turns into a strong network effect. This is the best-case scenario for China.”
Alex Jones brings out the documents he exposed two years ago detailing an organized effort to create racial division and civil unrest in America funded by George Soros.


newswars--2020-06-03--Twitter Suspends Malkin Amid Leftist Violence Despite Trump’s Big Tech Order

Twitter has suspended Michelle Malkin for a tweet that argued that “ violent criminal looters ” should be shot , and is demanding she remove it .
Malkin , the conservative and pro-America First political commentator , had written on Twitter as the recent Black Lives Matter riots first spread around the country that “ violent criminal looters should be shot.
” Five days after posting the initial tweet , Twitter decided that Malkin ’ s comments violate their rules against “ abuse and harassment , ” and have demanded that she delete the tweet .
If she does , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she is no longer suspended from the platform .
This is despite the fact that Malkin ’ s tweet echoed official statements from US police departments .
Sheriff Grady Judd of Polk County , Florida , warned looters on Monday that given he encourages the residents of his county to own guns , “ if you try to break into their homes to steal , to set fires , I ’ m highly recommending they blow you back out of the house with their guns.
” Twitter has also refused to remove tweets @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that clearly advocate for illegal violent acts .
The site is being used to co-ordinate looting , with rioters also planning Kristallnacht-style attacks on white businesses , and communist accounts pointing people towards rubber bullet factories to take down .
The suspension of Malkin would also likely contravene President Trump ’ s recent executive order , that bans Big Tech companies from censoring people from their platform for political reasons .
Speaking exclusively to National File , Malkin was defiant , saying that she would not delete her tweet , as “ there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ law and order ” : With America engulfed in spreading flames because of the riots , it is more important than ever that law-abiding citizens have the unfettered freedom to demand consequences for violent criminal behavior .
Twitter has rigged the social media playing field for years .
This is systemic , coordinated gaslighting by Silicon Valley and cultural Marxists .
I ’ m not an inciter of violence .
I ’ m a defender of peace .
Every day , Twitter allows Antifa to doxx and harass journalists and Trump supporters .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to incite escalating violence against cops .
I hope that those still remaining on the platform will re-double their efforts to expose the double standards and speak up against anarchy .
To get around Big Tech ’ s censoring , you can follow Malkin on Telegram and on Parler @ MichelleMalkin1 , or subscribe to her YouTube channel .

Twitter has suspended Michelle Malkin for a tweet that argued that “violent criminal looters” should be shot, and is demanding she remove it.
Malkin, the conservative and pro-America First political commentator, had written on Twitter as the recent Black Lives Matter riots first spread around the country that “violent criminal looters should be shot.”
Five days after posting the initial tweet, Twitter decided that Malkin’s comments violate their rules against “abuse and harassment,” and have demanded that she delete the tweet. If she does, a 12 hour countdown will begin before she is no longer suspended from the platform.
This is despite the fact that Malkin’s tweet echoed official statements from US police departments. Sheriff Grady Judd of Polk County, Florida, warned looters on Monday that given he encourages the residents of his county to own guns, “if you try to break into their homes to steal, to set fires, I’m highly recommending they blow you back out of the house with their guns.”
Twitter has also refused to remove tweets and crack down on accounts from leftists that clearly advocate for illegal violent acts. The site is being used to co-ordinate looting, with rioters also planning Kristallnacht-style attacks on white businesses, and communist accounts pointing people towards rubber bullet factories to take down.
The suspension of Malkin would also likely contravene President Trump’s recent executive order, that bans Big Tech companies from censoring people from their platform for political reasons.
Speaking exclusively to National File, Malkin was defiant, saying that she would not delete her tweet, as “there is nothing abusive or harassing about defending law and order”:
With America engulfed in spreading flames because of the riots, it is more important than ever that law-abiding citizens have the unfettered freedom to demand consequences for violent criminal behavior. Twitter has rigged the social media playing field for years. This is systemic, coordinated gaslighting by Silicon Valley and cultural Marxists. I’m not an inciter of violence. I’m a defender of peace. Every day, Twitter allows Antifa to doxx and harass journalists and Trump supporters. Every day, Twitter allows BLM agitators to incite escalating violence against cops. I hope that those still remaining on the platform will re-double their efforts to expose the double standards and speak up against anarchy.
To get around Big Tech’s censoring, you can follow Malkin on Telegram and on Parler @MichelleMalkin1, or subscribe to her YouTube channel.
EXPOSING BLACK LIVES MATTER


newswars--2020-06-03--Astronomers discover ultraviolet emission centered on the Big Dipper

Astronomers announced the discovery of a ghostly , almost perfectly circular , arc of ultraviolet emission centered on the handle of the Big Dipper and stretching 30 degrees across the Northern sky .
If the arc were extended , it would completely encircle the Big Dipper with a diameter of 60 degrees .
This unique object was discovered by Andrea Bracco , an astronomer at the Ruđer Bošković Institute in Zagreb , Croatia , Marta Alves , an astronomer at Radboud University in the Netherlands , and Robert Benjamin , a professor of physics and astronomy at the University of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , who contributed to the analysis of the structure , presented the team ’ s newest results at an on-line meeting of American Astronomical Society on June 2 .
A report on the discovery has been published in the April volume of Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters .
The arc , stretching beyond the constellation Ursa Major , is 30 degrees long , a fraction of a degree thick , and made of compressed , energized interstellar gas .
The source of the energy and the arc shape indicate an advancing shock wave from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 60 degrees above the plane of the Milky Way Galaxy .
The distance and age of the explosion which created the shock wave is highly uncertain .
The team estimates that the explosion occurred more than 100,000 years ago at a distance of approximately 600 light years .
Because the full circle covers nearly 2,700 square degrees of sky , the blast may have been partially responsible for creating a clearing of gas and dust above the sun .
“ This region of the sky is known for several interstellar windows used to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Milky Way .
This arc may be evidence for one of the explosions that created these windows , ” said Benjamin .
The arc was discovered in an archival dataset of ultraviolet images taken by NASA ’ s Galaxy Evolution Explorer ( GALEX ) as part of the GALEX All-Sky Imaging Survey and found using the Aladin Sky Atlas developed by CDS , Strasbourg Observatory , France .
By comparing the brightness of the emission in two different ultraviolet bands , the team argues that the ultraviolet emission arises predominantly from a compressed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the discovery dates to 1997 , when Peter McCullough , now an astronomer with the Space Telescope Science Institute , used an experimental camera which detected faint H-alpha emission to discover a two-degree-long straight line of H-alpha hydrogen gas across the sky , making it roughly the length of five moons put side-by-side .
H-alpha is an optical ( red ) emission line produced by hydrogen gas .
McCullough showed the pictures to Benjamin at a conference both were attending .
“ In astronomy , you never see perfectly straight lines in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ I got really interested , and Peter and I wrote a paper together , effectively saying ‘ There ’ s this odd straight line in the sky , what could it be ?
’ ” Nearly 20 years later , this work attracted the attention of Marta Alves who decided to observe the object using LOFAR , a network of low-frequency radio telescopes principally located in the Netherlands .
“ The fact that you have data in different wavelengths , it gives you more constraints as to the physical origin , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bracco , then found the ultraviolet arc while searching for archival datasets which could help them interpret the low-frequency radio observations .
Much to their surprise , the two-degree line of H-alpha stretched into a 30-degree arc in these ultraviolet observations .
“ Frankly , I could not believe that such a great structure in the sky was not known yet .
I was looking at ultraviolet observations from 15 years ago , ” said Bracco .
But some of their colleagues expressed concern that it might be a flaw in the data @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Alves met Benjamin at a workshop sponsored by the Université Paris-Saclay , where they invited him to help them interpret the arc .
Additional confirmation of the arc ’ s existence came when the team contacted a group of amateur astronomers in Massachusetts who were conducting their own survey of the sky using a robotic telescope based in New Mexico : the MDW ( Mittelman/di Cicco/Walker ) H-alpha survey .
When contacted , they uncovered a 10-degree section of an optical arc in the same area where the GALEX ultraviolet arc was seen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ paper ; additional researchers based in France ( Andrew Lehmann , Francois Boulanger , and Ludovic Montier ) also joined the effort to help in interpreting the ultraviolet emission .
So , what ’ s next ?
In addition to getting better constraints on the distance , age and physical size of the “ Ursa Major Arc , ” Alves noted that the ultraviolet discovery may help us better understand radio frequency telescope observations of the sky .
“ It opens the door for more low-frequency radio observations .
We have UV and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ observations would be really cool .
”

Astronomers announced the discovery of a ghostly, almost perfectly circular, arc of ultraviolet emission centered on the handle of the Big Dipper and stretching 30 degrees across the Northern sky.
If the arc were extended, it would completely encircle the Big Dipper with a diameter of 60 degrees.
This unique object was discovered by Andrea Bracco, an astronomer at the Ruđer Bošković Institute in Zagreb, Croatia, Marta Alves, an astronomer at Radboud University in the Netherlands, and Robert Benjamin, a professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater in the United States. Benjamin, who contributed to the analysis of the structure, presented the team’s newest results at an on-line meeting of American Astronomical Society on June 2. A report on the discovery has been published in the April volume of Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters.
The arc, stretching beyond the constellation Ursa Major, is 30 degrees long, a fraction of a degree thick, and made of compressed, energized interstellar gas. The source of the energy and the arc shape indicate an advancing shock wave from a stellar explosion or supernova which occurred 60 degrees above the plane of the Milky Way Galaxy. The distance and age of the explosion which created the shock wave is highly uncertain. The team estimates that the explosion occurred more than 100,000 years ago at a distance of approximately 600 light years.
Because the full circle covers nearly 2,700 square degrees of sky, the blast may have been partially responsible for creating a clearing of gas and dust above the sun. “This region of the sky is known for several interstellar windows used to study the properties of galaxies outside the Milky Way. This arc may be evidence for one of the explosions that created these windows,” said Benjamin.
The arc was discovered in an archival dataset of ultraviolet images taken by NASA’s Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) as part of the GALEX All-Sky Imaging Survey and found using the Aladin Sky Atlas developed by CDS, Strasbourg Observatory, France. By comparing the brightness of the emission in two different ultraviolet bands, the team argues that the ultraviolet emission arises predominantly from a compressed region of hydrogen gas.
The origin of the discovery dates to 1997, when Peter McCullough, now an astronomer with the Space Telescope Science Institute, used an experimental camera which detected faint H-alpha emission to discover a two-degree-long straight line of H-alpha hydrogen gas across the sky, making it roughly the length of five moons put side-by-side. H-alpha is an optical (red) emission line produced by hydrogen gas. McCullough showed the pictures to Benjamin at a conference both were attending.
“In astronomy, you never see perfectly straight lines in the sky,” said Benjamin. “I got really interested, and Peter and I wrote a paper together, effectively saying ‘There’s this odd straight line in the sky, what could it be?’”
Nearly 20 years later, this work attracted the attention of Marta Alves who decided to observe the object using LOFAR, a network of low-frequency radio telescopes principally located in the Netherlands. “The fact that you have data in different wavelengths, it gives you more constraints as to the physical origin,” noted Alves. Her colleague, Andrea Bracco, then found the ultraviolet arc while searching for archival datasets which could help them interpret the low-frequency radio observations.
Much to their surprise, the two-degree line of H-alpha stretched into a 30-degree arc in these ultraviolet observations. “Frankly, I could not believe that such a great structure in the sky was not known yet. I was looking at ultraviolet observations from 15 years ago,” said Bracco. But some of their colleagues expressed concern that it might be a flaw in the data. In October 2018, Bracco and Alves met Benjamin at a workshop sponsored by the Université Paris-Saclay, where they invited him to help them interpret the arc.
Additional confirmation of the arc’s existence came when the team contacted a group of amateur astronomers in Massachusetts who were conducting their own survey of the sky using a robotic telescope based in New Mexico: the MDW (Mittelman/di Cicco/Walker) H-alpha survey. When contacted, they uncovered a 10-degree section of an optical arc in the same area where the GALEX ultraviolet arc was seen. They contributed their observations to the paper; additional researchers based in France (Andrew Lehmann, Francois Boulanger, and Ludovic Montier) also joined the effort to help in interpreting the ultraviolet emission.
So, what’s next? In addition to getting better constraints on the distance, age and physical size of the “Ursa Major Arc,” Alves noted that the ultraviolet discovery may help us better understand radio frequency telescope observations of the sky. “It opens the door for more low-frequency radio observations. We have UV and H-alpha now, adding in the radio observations would be really cool.”


newswars--2020-06-03--Watch: Psychotic Protester Screeches at Man For Shouting “Trump 2020!”

A mohawk-sporting leftist was confronted after screaming at Trump supporters , footage from Tuesday ’ s protests shows .
In @ @ @ @ @ protester screams at the top of her lungs at people holding a “ Trump 2020 @ @ @ @ @ Trump supporter to try to match her scream while yelling , “ Trump 2020.
” @ @ @ @ @ was dragged off and no violence came out of the incident .
Owen Shroyer was @ @ @ @ @ he drove down the street in downtown Austin during the rioting this weekend .

A mohawk-sporting leftist was confronted after screaming at Trump supporters, footage from Tuesday’s protests shows.
In the video, a leftist protester screams at the top of her lungs at people holding a “Trump 2020” flag, prompting a Trump supporter to try to match her scream while yelling, “Trump 2020.”
The Left and Right in 2020: (A perfect video) Which side are you on? pic.twitter.com/7e3rygtuln — Benny (@bennyjohnson) June 3, 2020
Fortunately, the militant-looking protester was dragged off and no violence came out of the incident.
Owen Shroyer was attacked by rabid leftists as he drove down the street in downtown Austin during the rioting this weekend.


newswars--2020-06-03--War for Hong Kong?

War for Hong Kong?

President Trump faces trouble , and he is handling it in a dangerous way .
Our economy is reeling as the Fed pours out billions of dollars in a futile effort to avert disaster .
We know to our cost that politicians , faced with crisis at home , provoke war “ to busy giddy minds with foreign quarrels.
” Unfortunately , this is just what Trump is doing .
According to a CNN news report on Friday , May 28 , President Donald Trump launched a blistering attack on Beijing Friday , naming misdeeds that range from espionage to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ freedoms , and announced a slew of retaliatory measures that will plunge US-China relations deeper into crisis .
“ They ’ ve ripped off the United States like no one has ever done before , ” Trump said of China , as he decried the way Beijing has “ raided our factories ” and “ gutted ” American industry , casting Beijing as a central foil he will run against in the remaining months of his re-election campaign .
Trump called out China for “ espionage to steal our industrial secrets , of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ steps to protect American investors from Chinese financial practices , accused Beijing of “ unlawfully claiming territory in the Pacific Ocean ” and threatening freedom of navigation .
The President also blasted Beijing for passing a national security law that fundamentally undermines Hong Kong ’ s autonomy , announcing that going forward the US will no longer grant Hong Kong special status on trade or in other areas and instead will apply the same restrictions to the territory it has in place with China .
Trump outlined that the US will strip Hong @ @ @ @ @ @ @ extradition , trade , travel and customs Washington had previously granted it .
Let ’ s look at Hong Kong first , as this is the issue most likely to get the American public roused up .
“ Isn ’ t it terrible , ” some people will say , “ that the Chinese government has rounded up and imprisoned rioters against its authority in Hong Kong ?
” In answer to this , you need to bear in mind a key fact .
The American government instigated the Hong Kong protests , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ challenge to the Chinese government .
As Tony Cartalucci , Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer , especially known for the online magazine New Eastern Outlook , pointed out last September , even US policymakers have all but admitted that the US is funnelling millions of dollars into Hong Kong specifically to support “ programs ” there .
The Hudson Institute in an article titled , “ China Tries to Blame US for Hong Kong Protests ” would admit : A Chinese state-run newspaper ’ s claim that the United States is helping pro-democracy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ inaccurate , a top foreign policy expert said Monday .
Michael Pillsbury , senior fellow at the Hudson Institute , told Fox News National Security Analyst KT McFarland the U.S. holds some influence over political matters in the region .
The article would then quote Pillsbury as saying : We have a large consulate there that ’ s in charge of taking care of the Hong Kong Policy Act passed by Congress to insure [ sic ] democracy in Hong Kong , and we have also funded millions of dollars of programs through @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ] …so in that sense the Chinese accusation is not totally false .
A visit to the NED ’ s website reveals an entire section of declared funding for Hong Kong specifically .
The wording for program titles and their descriptions is intentionally ambiguous to give those like US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo plausible deniability .
However , deeper research reveals NED recipients are literally leading the protests .
Given this provocative US behavior , the Chinese government could not back down .
As Pat Buchanan warned back in December : There @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
China has just celebrated the 70th anniversary of the Revolution where Mao proclaimed , “ China has stood up !
” after a century of foreign humiliations and occupations .
Can Xi Jinping , already the object of a Maoist cult of personality , accept U.S. intervention in the internal affairs of his country or a city that belongs to China ?
Not likely .
Nor is China likely to accede to demands for greater sovereignty , self-determination or independence for Hong Kong .
This would only raise hopes of the city @ @ @ @ @ @ @ destiny : direct rule by Beijing when the 50-year China-U.K. treaty regarding the transfer of Hong Kong expires in 2047 .
For Xi to capitulate to the demands of Hong Kong ’ s demonstrators could cause an outbreak of protests in other Chinese cities and bring on a crisis of the regime .
In thinking about what to do , we need to be guided by the wisdom of Murray Rothbard .
He long ago pointed out that we should oppose American intervention into foreign countries .
It isn ’ t our job @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
We should mind our own business .
As he put it , We must say rather that , given the unfortunate existence of the State , we must limit and reduce its power , anywhere and everywhere , and wherever possible .
We must try constantly to abolish or at least lower taxes—whether for “ defense ” or for anything else—and never , never advocate any tax increase .
Given the existence of the State , we must try to abolish , and if not abolish to limit and reduce , its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ counterfeiting , police state aggression , controls , regulations , or whatever .
And similarly , we must try to abolish its external power—its power over the citizens of other States .
The criminal State must be reduced as much as we can everywhere—whether it be in its internal or external power .
In contrast to the usual right-wing partiality for foreign over domestic intervention , we must recognize that foreign intervention tends to be far worse .
What Murray said about intervention in Eastern Europe when it was under communist control applies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t misunderstand me ; I have not abandoned moral principle for cynicism .
My heart yearns for ethnic justice , for national self-determination for all peoples….But , to paraphrase Sydney Smith ’ s famous letter to Lady Grey , please let them work this out for themselves !
Let us abandon the criminal immorality and folly of continual coercive meddling by non–Eastern European powers ( e.g .
Britain , France , and now the U.S. ) in the affairs of East Europe .
Let us hope that one day Germany and Russia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ justice to the peoples of East Europe , but let us not bring about perpetual wars to try to achieve this artificially .
Trump ’ s complaints about China ’ s trade policies again ignore the role of American provocation .
Eric Margolis identifies the core fallacy in Trump ’ s strategy : Trump ’ s wars are economic .
They deploy the huge economic and financial might of the United States to steamroll other nations that fail to comply with orders from Washington .
Washington ’ s motto is “ obey me @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not bloodless .
Imperial Germany and the Central Powers were starved into surrender in 1918 by a crushing British naval blockade .
Trade sanctions are not making America great , as Trump claims .
They are making America detested around the globe as a crude bully .
Trump ’ s efforts to undermine the European Union and intimidate Canada add to this ugly , brutal image .
Trump ’ s ultimate objective , as China clearly knows , is to whip up a world crisis over trade , then dramatically end it—of course @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Trump has become a master dictator of US financial markets , rising or lowering them by surprise tweets .
No president should ever have such power , but Trump has seized it .
Trade wars rarely produce any benefits for either side .
They are the equivalent of sending tens of thousands of soldiers to be mowed down by machine guns on the blood-soaked Somme battlefield in WWI .
Glory for the stupid generals ; death and misery for the common soldiers .
Trump also mentioned Chinese claims of territory in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the South China Sea belongs to them , not to us , yet we send our ships there and insist that we have a right to control what happens there .
Also , a great deal of China ’ s industry and agriculture is privately owned , so an attack on China would be an attack on private property .
Both the neocons and the nationalist “ right ” want war with China .
We should aim at peace instead , as Murray Rothbard and Ron Paul have taught us .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ industrial espionage .
The US has for decades spied on and monitored governments and industries all over the world , of course including China .
As the writer “ b ” at the Moon of Alabama website has said , European countries do not fear China or even Chinese spying .
They know that the U.S. is doing similar on a much larger scale .
Europeans do not see China as a threat and they do not want to get involved in the escalating U.S.-China spat….Every nation spies .
It is one of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ That the U.S. is making such a fuss about putative Chinese spying when it itself is the biggest sinner is unbecoming .
The Chinese people are highly productive and intelligent , and their success doesn ’ t depend on industrial espionage against the United States .
Rather than condemn the Chinese , Trump should commend them for their monumental steps toward a free market , with unprecedented economic growth , after suffering the carnage of Maoist communism .
Trump spoke about suing the Chinese for the damage caused by the COVID-19 epidemic .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ month , “ There is good reason to believe that the coronavirus epidemic is part of an American biological warfare campaign against China and Iran .
The brilliant physicist Ron Unz , who has time and time again been proved right by events , makes this case in a scintillating analysis.
” Even if the US didn ’ t do this , it would be highly irregular to sue a nation just because a virus began there .
Besides , if America wants to go that route , wouldn ’ t many countries @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the American government did to them ?
What about Iraq , which has suffered from US bombing and blockades in a war now widely admitted to be a mistake ?
What about people all over the world who have been killed with arms supplied to foreign governments by the US ?
Rather than stir up trouble with China , President Trump should promote free trade .
How can it help the people of Hong Kong to deny them its free port , with no tariffs on imports or exports ?
America needs to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the terrible lockdown and financial irresponsibility .
War with China will only make our present crisis immeasurably worse .

President Trump faces trouble, and he is handling it in a dangerous way.
Our economy is reeling as the Fed pours out billions of dollars in a futile effort to avert disaster. We know to our cost that politicians, faced with crisis at home, provoke war “to busy giddy minds with foreign quarrels.”
Unfortunately, this is just what Trump is doing. According to a CNN news report on Friday, May 28,
President Donald Trump launched a blistering attack on Beijing Friday, naming misdeeds that range from espionage to the violation of Hong Kong’s freedoms, and announced a slew of retaliatory measures that will plunge US-China relations deeper into crisis.
“They’ve ripped off the United States like no one has ever done before,” Trump said of China, as he decried the way Beijing has “raided our factories” and “gutted” American industry, casting Beijing as a central foil he will run against in the remaining months of his re-election campaign.
Trump called out China for “espionage to steal our industrial secrets, of which there are many,” announced steps to protect American investors from Chinese financial practices, accused Beijing of “unlawfully claiming territory in the Pacific Ocean” and threatening freedom of navigation.
The President also blasted Beijing for passing a national security law that fundamentally undermines Hong Kong’s autonomy, announcing that going forward the US will no longer grant Hong Kong special status on trade or in other areas and instead will apply the same restrictions to the territory it has in place with China. Trump outlined that the US will strip Hong Kong of the special policy measures on extradition, trade, travel and customs Washington had previously granted it.
Let’s look at Hong Kong first, as this is the issue most likely to get the American public roused up. “Isn’t it terrible,” some people will say, “that the Chinese government has rounded up and imprisoned rioters against its authority in Hong Kong?” In answer to this, you need to bear in mind a key fact. The American government instigated the Hong Kong protests, and egged them on in a direct challenge to the Chinese government. As Tony Cartalucci, Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer, especially known for the online magazine New Eastern Outlook, pointed out last September,
even US policymakers have all but admitted that the US is funnelling millions of dollars into Hong Kong specifically to support “programs” there. The Hudson Institute in an article titled, “China Tries to Blame US for Hong Kong Protests” would admit:
A Chinese state-run newspaper’s claim that the United States is helping pro-democracy protesters in Hong Kong is only partially inaccurate, a top foreign policy expert said Monday.
Michael Pillsbury, senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, told Fox News National Security Analyst KT McFarland the U.S. holds some influence over political matters in the region.
The article would then quote Pillsbury as saying:
We have a large consulate there that’s in charge of taking care of the Hong Kong Policy Act passed by Congress to insure [sic] democracy in Hong Kong, and we have also funded millions of dollars of programs through the National Endowment for Democracy [NED]…so in that sense the Chinese accusation is not totally false.
A visit to the NED’s website reveals an entire section of declared funding for Hong Kong specifically. The wording for program titles and their descriptions is intentionally ambiguous to give those like US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo plausible deniability.
However, deeper research reveals NED recipients are literally leading the protests.
Given this provocative US behavior, the Chinese government could not back down. As Pat Buchanan warned back in December:
There is another issue here—the matter of face.
China has just celebrated the 70th anniversary of the Revolution where Mao proclaimed, “China has stood up!” after a century of foreign humiliations and occupations.
Can Xi Jinping, already the object of a Maoist cult of personality, accept U.S. intervention in the internal affairs of his country or a city that belongs to China? Not likely. Nor is China likely to accede to demands for greater sovereignty, self-determination or independence for Hong Kong.
This would only raise hopes of the city’s eventual escape from its ordained destiny: direct rule by Beijing when the 50-year China-U.K. treaty regarding the transfer of Hong Kong expires in 2047. For Xi to capitulate to the demands of Hong Kong’s demonstrators could cause an outbreak of protests in other Chinese cities and bring on a crisis of the regime.
In thinking about what to do, we need to be guided by the wisdom of Murray Rothbard. He long ago pointed out that we should oppose American intervention into foreign countries. It isn’t our job to act as a world rights-enforcing agency. We should mind our own business. As he put it,
We must say rather that, given the unfortunate existence of the State, we must limit and reduce its power, anywhere and everywhere, and wherever possible. We must try constantly to abolish or at least lower taxes—whether for “defense” or for anything else—and never, never advocate any tax increase. Given the existence of the State, we must try to abolish, and if not abolish to limit and reduce, its internal power—its internal exercise of taxation, counterfeiting, police state aggression, controls, regulations, or whatever. And similarly, we must try to abolish its external power—its power over the citizens of other States. The criminal State must be reduced as much as we can everywhere—whether it be in its internal or external power. In contrast to the usual right-wing partiality for foreign over domestic intervention, we must recognize that foreign intervention tends to be far worse.
What Murray said about intervention in Eastern Europe when it was under communist control applies perfectly to our situation:
Now don’t misunderstand me; I have not abandoned moral principle for cynicism. My heart yearns for ethnic justice, for national self-determination for all peoples….But, to paraphrase Sydney Smith’s famous letter to Lady Grey, please let them work this out for themselves! Let us abandon the criminal immorality and folly of continual coercive meddling by non–Eastern European powers (e.g. Britain, France, and now the U.S.) in the affairs of East Europe. Let us hope that one day Germany and Russia, at peace, will willingly grant justice to the peoples of East Europe, but let us not bring about perpetual wars to try to achieve this artificially.
Trump’s complaints about China’s trade policies again ignore the role of American provocation. Eric Margolis identifies the core fallacy in Trump’s strategy:
Trump’s wars are economic. They deploy the huge economic and financial might of the United States to steamroll other nations that fail to comply with orders from Washington. Washington’s motto is “obey me or else!” Economic wars are not bloodless. Imperial Germany and the Central Powers were starved into surrender in 1918 by a crushing British naval blockade.
Trade sanctions are not making America great, as Trump claims. They are making America detested around the globe as a crude bully. Trump’s efforts to undermine the European Union and intimidate Canada add to this ugly, brutal image.
Trump’s ultimate objective, as China clearly knows, is to whip up a world crisis over trade, then dramatically end it—of course, before next year’s elections. Trump has become a master dictator of US financial markets, rising or lowering them by surprise tweets. No president should ever have such power, but Trump has seized it.
Trade wars rarely produce any benefits for either side. They are the equivalent of sending tens of thousands of soldiers to be mowed down by machine guns on the blood-soaked Somme battlefield in WWI. Glory for the stupid generals; death and misery for the common soldiers.
Trump also mentioned Chinese claims of territory in the Pacific Ocean. He ignored the fact that the South China Sea belongs to them, not to us, yet we send our ships there and insist that we have a right to control what happens there. Also, a great deal of China’s industry and agriculture is privately owned, so an attack on China would be an attack on private property. Both the neocons and the nationalist “right” want war with China. We should aim at peace instead, as Murray Rothbard and Ron Paul have taught us.
It is ironic that Trump accused China of industrial espionage. The US has for decades spied on and monitored governments and industries all over the world, of course including China.
As the writer “b” at the Moon of Alabama website has said,
European countries do not fear China or even Chinese spying. They know that the U.S. is doing similar on a much larger scale. Europeans do not see China as a threat and they do not want to get involved in the escalating U.S.-China spat….Every nation spies. It is one of the oldest trades in this world. That the U.S. is making such a fuss about putative Chinese spying when it itself is the biggest sinner is unbecoming.
The Chinese people are highly productive and intelligent, and their success doesn’t depend on industrial espionage against the United States. Rather than condemn the Chinese, Trump should commend them for their monumental steps toward a free market, with unprecedented economic growth, after suffering the carnage of Maoist communism.
Trump spoke about suing the Chinese for the damage caused by the COVID-19 epidemic. As I wrote in an article last month, “There is good reason to believe that the coronavirus epidemic is part of an American biological warfare campaign against China and Iran. The brilliant physicist Ron Unz, who has time and time again been proved right by events, makes this case in a scintillating analysis.”
Even if the US didn’t do this, it would be highly irregular to sue a nation just because a virus began there. Besides, if America wants to go that route, wouldn’t many countries have grounds to sue America for what the American government did to them? What about Iraq, which has suffered from US bombing and blockades in a war now widely admitted to be a mistake? What about people all over the world who have been killed with arms supplied to foreign governments by the US?
Rather than stir up trouble with China, President Trump should promote free trade. How can it help the people of Hong Kong to deny them its free port, with no tariffs on imports or exports? America needs to confront its domestic crisis, brought on by the terrible lockdown and financial irresponsibility. War with China will only make our present crisis immeasurably worse.


newswars--2020-06-03--Progressives and the Origins of the Economic “Consensus”

There was a time when free market economists were some of the most highly praised intellectuals in the modern world .
In the early twentieth century , Austrian economics was understood for what it truly is : a social science based on praxeology and human action .
But from the mid-1900s through the 2000s , society replaced their appreciation for the Viennese method with a false claim that Austrian economics was an ideological , archaic pseudoscience used to justify libertarian and conservative ideas .
And although the mainstream throws Chicagoan and even Austrian economists a bone from time to time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ modern monetary theory ( MMT ) or some form of Keynesianism .
But in order to understand why the mainstream is the way it is , we must first understand how the economic consensus came to be .
The London School of Economics ( LSE ) played a crucial role in the shaping of modern academia .
A little-known fact about the LSE is that the institution was largely built and supported by the Fabian Society , a socialist institute founded in 1884 .
In fact , Beatrice and Sidney Webb , two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , were also the founders of the LSE .
In the Fabian Society ’ s infancy , it often constituted a small , tight-knit group of intellectuals who met to discuss Marxist ideas .
But as the Fabian Society expanded to include the London School of Economics and the New Statesman magazine , its influence on economics underwent a sort of metamorphosis .
The LSE ’ s reputation began to grow and few ever questioned its stances .
To this day , the rapid spread of Keynesianism is largely a product of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ similar neighbor , the University of Cambridge .
John Maynard Keynes , after all , was an alumni of Cambridge and made notable contributions to institutions near and far , such as the LSE and the International Monetary Fund ( IMF ) Bretton Woods system .
The circulation of socialist and Keynesian philosophies between neighboring British institutions created a pseudo-intellectual echo chamber , in which the same ideas were debated over and over again among the same academics .
However , there was a major problem with Keynesianism .
Many believed that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ noble , but they were rarely backed by empirical evidence .
Therefore , most schools of economics decided to abandon Keynes ’ s specific prescription of demand-side economics for a broader form of policy interventionism .
Paving the Way for Modern Macroeconomics Thus , we turn from John Maynard Keynes and the Fabian Society to other significant influencers who paved the way for modern macroeconomics .
The American Economic Association ( AEA ) , one of the leading publishers of economic literature , was founded by politically progressive intellectuals such as Richard T. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ advocated for greater government oversight and the implementation of desirable social policies .
Based on his work , Ely ’ s views can best be summarized as moderately redistributive and highly interventionist .
One of his books contains a chapter entitled “ Taxation of Incomes , ” in which he states the following : It has already been stated…that all men of means should contribute to the support of government in proportion to their ability….It is universally , or almost universally , admitted that no [ other ] tax [ than the income @ @ @ @ @ @ @ T ] he income tax , unlike license charges , does not make it more difficult for a poor man to begin business or to continue business .
Its social effects , on the contrary , are beneficial , because it places a heavy load only on strong shoulders .
Richard T. Ely was not the only interventionist who helped establish the AEA .
Katharine Coman , a progressive activist who was highly critical of capitalism , also played a major role in forming the organization .
Additionally , in appointing Alvin Hanson @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , to its presidency in 1922 , the AEA is partly responsible for the rise of Keynesianism in America .
To the American Economic Association ’ s credit , they have given similar positions to free market economists such as Herbert Joseph Davenport and Frank Fetter .
But the bigger picture here is the AEA ’ s clear intent to draw an equivalency between Austrian intellectuals and progressive ideologues—as if the two were morally and intellectually comparable .
In later years , the American Economic Association would attempt to distance itself from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an Austrian economist was elected president was in 1966 , with the appointment of Fritz Machlup .
To put this into perspective , Jacob Marschak , an economist who worked with the Menshevist International Caucus , was scheduled to be appointed to the presidency in 1978 .
In other words , the American Economic Association would sooner elect a Soviet sympathizer president than an Austrian economist .
All in all , the impact of the anti-Austrian and , to some extent , the anti-Chicagoan biases of mainstream academia can be traced back to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ progressive thought leaders or dismissing certain kinds of economic methodology that fail to fit the interventionist narrative .
Much of our understanding of mainstream economics is derived from econometrics—the use of mathematical modeling to predict economic outcomes .
It is arguably true that econometrics is the reason why economics as a field is suffering from an identity crisis .
On the one hand , economics deals with human behavior and is therefore a social science .
On the other , econometrics and similar methods of study result in a field that resembles mathematics @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or the study of human action .
It should be no surprise that econometrics has become quite popular in the mainstream .
After all , the aforementioned Jacob Marschak was one of the fathers of econometrics and made an undeniable impact on universities such as Yale and UCLA before catching the attention of the American Economic Association .
Since its inception , econometrics has become a sort of “ industry standard ” for mainstream academics .
However , the fatal flaw of econometrics lies in its failure to understand praxeology .
In the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ article entitled “ What is Wrong with Econometrics ?
” : There are no constant standards for measuring the minds , the values , and the ideas of men .
Valuation is the means by which a conscious purposeful individual assesses the given facts of reality .
As for the Keynesian and post-Keynesian schools , far too much can be said about their flaws .
Little empirical evidence exists that stimulus packages are particularly effective , and the idea that Say ’ s law ought to be completely discarded for a demand-driven approach @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hazlitt ’ s The Failure of the “ New Economics ” provides a full perspective on the shortcomings of Keynesianism .

There was a time when free market economists were some of the most highly praised intellectuals in the modern world.
In the early twentieth century, Austrian economics was understood for what it truly is: a social science based on praxeology and human action. But from the mid-1900s through the 2000s, society replaced their appreciation for the Viennese method with a false claim that Austrian economics was an ideological, archaic pseudoscience used to justify libertarian and conservative ideas. And although the mainstream throws Chicagoan and even Austrian economists a bone from time to time, most academics have drifted toward the modern monetary theory (MMT) or some form of Keynesianism. But in order to understand why the mainstream is the way it is, we must first understand how the economic consensus came to be.
Origins of the Economic “Consensus”
The London School of Economics (LSE) played a crucial role in the shaping of modern academia. A little-known fact about the LSE is that the institution was largely built and supported by the Fabian Society, a socialist institute founded in 1884. In fact, Beatrice and Sidney Webb, two of the founders of the Fabian Society, were also the founders of the LSE.
In the Fabian Society’s infancy, it often constituted a small, tight-knit group of intellectuals who met to discuss Marxist ideas. But as the Fabian Society expanded to include the London School of Economics and the New Statesman magazine, its influence on economics underwent a sort of metamorphosis. The LSE’s reputation began to grow and few ever questioned its stances. To this day, the rapid spread of Keynesianism is largely a product of the London School of Economics and its ideologically similar neighbor, the University of Cambridge. John Maynard Keynes, after all, was an alumni of Cambridge and made notable contributions to institutions near and far, such as the LSE and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) Bretton Woods system. The circulation of socialist and Keynesian philosophies between neighboring British institutions created a pseudo-intellectual echo chamber, in which the same ideas were debated over and over again among the same academics.
However, there was a major problem with Keynesianism. Many believed that the theories of demand-side economics sounded just and noble, but they were rarely backed by empirical evidence. Therefore, most schools of economics decided to abandon Keynes’s specific prescription of demand-side economics for a broader form of policy interventionism.
Paving the Way for Modern Macroeconomics
Thus, we turn from John Maynard Keynes and the Fabian Society to other significant influencers who paved the way for modern macroeconomics. The American Economic Association (AEA), one of the leading publishers of economic literature, was founded by politically progressive intellectuals such as Richard T. Ely, an activist and professor who advocated for greater government oversight and the implementation of desirable social policies. Based on his work, Ely’s views can best be summarized as moderately redistributive and highly interventionist. One of his books contains a chapter entitled “Taxation of Incomes,” in which he states the following:
It has already been stated…that all men of means should contribute to the support of government in proportion to their ability….It is universally, or almost universally, admitted that no [other] tax [than the income tax] is so just….[T]he income tax, unlike license charges, does not make it more difficult for a poor man to begin business or to continue business. Its social effects, on the contrary, are beneficial, because it places a heavy load only on strong shoulders.
Richard T. Ely was not the only interventionist who helped establish the AEA. Katharine Coman, a progressive activist who was highly critical of capitalism, also played a major role in forming the organization. Additionally, in appointing Alvin Hanson, one of the most influential Keynesians, to its presidency in 1922, the AEA is partly responsible for the rise of Keynesianism in America. To the American Economic Association’s credit, they have given similar positions to free market economists such as Herbert Joseph Davenport and Frank Fetter. But the bigger picture here is the AEA’s clear intent to draw an equivalency between Austrian intellectuals and progressive ideologues—as if the two were morally and intellectually comparable.
In later years, the American Economic Association would attempt to distance itself from the Austrian school altogether. The last time an Austrian economist was elected president was in 1966, with the appointment of Fritz Machlup. To put this into perspective, Jacob Marschak, an economist who worked with the Menshevist International Caucus, was scheduled to be appointed to the presidency in 1978. In other words, the American Economic Association would sooner elect a Soviet sympathizer president than an Austrian economist.
All in all, the impact of the anti-Austrian and, to some extent, the anti-Chicagoan biases of mainstream academia can be traced back to various instances of famous institutions either backing progressive thought leaders or dismissing certain kinds of economic methodology that fail to fit the interventionist narrative.
The Flaws of Mainstream Economics
Much of our understanding of mainstream economics is derived from econometrics—the use of mathematical modeling to predict economic outcomes. It is arguably true that econometrics is the reason why economics as a field is suffering from an identity crisis. On the one hand, economics deals with human behavior and is therefore a social science. On the other, econometrics and similar methods of study result in a field that resembles mathematics and cold calculation rather than behavioral science or the study of human action.
It should be no surprise that econometrics has become quite popular in the mainstream. After all, the aforementioned Jacob Marschak was one of the fathers of econometrics and made an undeniable impact on universities such as Yale and UCLA before catching the attention of the American Economic Association. Since its inception, econometrics has become a sort of “industry standard” for mainstream academics. However, the fatal flaw of econometrics lies in its failure to understand praxeology. In the words of Frank Shostak in his 2002 article entitled “What is Wrong with Econometrics?”:
There are no constant standards for measuring the minds, the values, and the ideas of men. Valuation is the means by which a conscious purposeful individual assesses the given facts of reality.
As for the Keynesian and post-Keynesian schools, far too much can be said about their flaws. Little empirical evidence exists that stimulus packages are particularly effective, and the idea that Say’s law ought to be completely discarded for a demand-driven approach to the economy is nonsensical. Henry Hazlitt’s The Failure of the “New Economics” provides a full perspective on the shortcomings of Keynesianism.


newswars--2020-06-03--Video: Hundreds of Whites Renounce Privilege in White Guilt Prayer

Eerie footage out of Maryland shows hundreds of white people sitting on the ground reciting a sermon in which they @ @ @ @ @ .
In video shot Tuesday , scores of white people are seen sitting on the @ @ @ @ @ to the sky in front of a Bethesda public library begging for forgiveness from black @ @ @ @ @ George Floyd at the hands of police .
“ I will use my voice in @ @ @ @ @ , and do everything in my power to educate my community , ” a person @ @ @ @ @ which everyone in attendance repeats in a cult-like fashion .
“ I will love my @ @ @ @ @ my white ones , ” the person states over the loudspeaker .
As leftists revel @ @ @ @ @ service , ” recall just mere weeks ago they rejoiced as Christians and other religious @ @ @ @ @ cited for attending church services .
Kris Wyrick joins Owen to explain the details of @ @ @ @ @ members in California .

Eerie footage out of Maryland shows hundreds of white people sitting on the ground reciting a sermon in which they apologize for their white privilege.
In video shot Tuesday, scores of white people are seen sitting on the street with their hands raised to the sky in front of a Bethesda public library begging for forgiveness from black people following the death of George Floyd at the hands of police.
Hundreds of white people get on the ground and renounce their white privilege. pic.twitter.com/eLPOe9q5cx — Tezcacoatl Amazolli (@GhostVirusX) June 2, 2020
“I will use my voice in the most uplifting way possible, and do everything in my power to educate my community,” a person says over a loudspeaker, which everyone in attendance repeats in a cult-like fashion.
“I will love my black neighbors the same as my white ones,” the person states over the loudspeaker.
As leftists revel in their “evangelical-style religious service,” recall just mere weeks ago they rejoiced as Christians and other religious groups were being arrested and cited for attending church services.
Kris Wyrick joins Owen to explain the details of his violent encounter with Antifa members in California.


newswars--2020-06-03--Nurses Who Accused Stay at Home Protesters of ‘Killing Granny’ Applaud Thousands of Left-Wing Demons

Nurses Who Accused Stay at Home Protesters of ‘Killing Granny’ Applaud Thousands of Left-Wing Demonstrators in New York

Some of the same hospital workers who would have accused stay-at-home protesters of “ killing granny ” just weeks ago are now on video applauding thousands of left-wing demonstrators in New York .
“ Hospital staff come out to applaud # GeorgeFloyd protestors in New York – demonstrators shout back ‘ Thank You ’ , ” tweeted journalist Sarah Walton .
The footage stands in stark contrast to photo ops endlessly hyped by the media which showed nurses and other health workers in masks blocking traffic at anti-lockdown protests throughout the country , such as the example below from Colorado @ @ @ @ @ @ @ underscores how coronavirus was completely politicized and that its dangers were greatly exaggerated .
If the virus was so deadly and easily transmissible as we were told , why are health workers celebrating mass gatherings of people that increase the risk of the disease spreading ?
A virus doesn ’ t behave differently based on the political beliefs of the person it infects .
So why is someone only responsible for “ killing granny ” is they ’ re a Trump supporter as oppose to an Antifa radical ?
The protests have also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ UK , where despite the fact that UK police only killed 2 unarmed men in the whole of 2019 ( one of whom was a terrorist ) , mass demonstrations have also hit London .
But while the media has since March denounced anyone who flouts or even questions the lockdown law , they had nothing but gushing praise for the thousands of Black Lives Matter protesters who have gathered in close proximity three times over the last week .
Police are still raiding and shutting down outdoor parties involving hundreds of people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ allowed to go ahead unimpeded .
What ’ s the difference ?
Does the virus suddenly become ‘ woke ’ and refuse to spread at Black Lives Matter rallies .
“ It ’ s kind of amazing , ” writes Ben Sixsmith .
“ For weeks we have been arguing about the minute details of viral transmission .
Can you be outside ?
How often can you be outside ?
Can you be with other people ?
How many ?
And how much distance should you keep from each other ?
Then masses @ @ @ @ @ @ @ world for a protest and the authorities do nothing .
It just goes ahead.
” “ The irony of protestors chanting ‘ I can ’ t breathe ’ as they raise the risk of catching and spreading a respiratory disease blows the mind .
Granted , outdoor transmission is considerably rarer than indoor transmission – and , besides , most of these protesters are young and would be okay if infected with Covid-19 .
But after weeks of people having to miss surgeries , funerals , weddings and last moments with their loved @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have to have a good reason to organise an outright mass gathering.
” My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever .
It is CRUCIAL that you support me .
Please sign up for the free newsletter here .
Donate to me on SubscribeStar here .
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown .

Some of the same hospital workers who would have accused stay-at-home protesters of “killing granny” just weeks ago are now on video applauding thousands of left-wing demonstrators in New York.
“Hospital staff come out to applaud #GeorgeFloyd protestors in New York – demonstrators shout back ‘Thank You’,” tweeted journalist Sarah Walton.
Hospital staff come out to applaud #GeorgeFloyd protestors in New York – demonstrators shout back ‘Thank You’. pic.twitter.com/1BBLiL04JT — Sarah Walton (@SarahWaltonNews) June 2, 2020
The footage stands in stark contrast to photo ops endlessly hyped by the media which showed nurses and other health workers in masks blocking traffic at anti-lockdown protests throughout the country, such as the example below from Colorado.
The contrast between the two reactions underscores how coronavirus was completely politicized and that its dangers were greatly exaggerated. If the virus was so deadly and easily transmissible as we were told, why are health workers celebrating mass gatherings of people that increase the risk of the disease spreading?
A virus doesn’t behave differently based on the political beliefs of the person it infects. So why is someone only responsible for “killing granny” is they’re a Trump supporter as oppose to an Antifa radical?
The protests have also spread like a virus over to the UK, where despite the fact that UK police only killed 2 unarmed men in the whole of 2019 (one of whom was a terrorist), mass demonstrations have also hit London.
But while the media has since March denounced anyone who flouts or even questions the lockdown law, they had nothing but gushing praise for the thousands of Black Lives Matter protesters who have gathered in close proximity three times over the last week.
Police are still raiding and shutting down outdoor parties involving hundreds of people, but marches involving many thousands are allowed to go ahead unimpeded.
What’s the difference? Does the virus suddenly become ‘woke’ and refuse to spread at Black Lives Matter rallies.
All those cancelled weddings, missed funerals and never-to-be-had last moments with their loved ones that people were expected to endure, only to see other people doing this.https://t.co/BVNTO4tMGD — Ben Sixsmith (@BDSixsmith) June 3, 2020
“It’s kind of amazing,” writes Ben Sixsmith. “For weeks we have been arguing about the minute details of viral transmission. Can you be outside? How often can you be outside? Can you be with other people? How many? And how much distance should you keep from each other? Then masses of people gather in cities across the world for a protest and the authorities do nothing. It just goes ahead.”
“The irony of protestors chanting ‘I can’t breathe’ as they raise the risk of catching and spreading a respiratory disease blows the mind. Granted, outdoor transmission is considerably rarer than indoor transmission – and, besides, most of these protesters are young and would be okay if infected with Covid-19. But after weeks of people having to miss surgeries, funerals, weddings and last moments with their loved ones, you would think people would have to have a good reason to organise an outright mass gathering.”
Anti-lockdown protests are bad, spread coronavirus and “kill granny”. You will be publicly shamed if you take part. BLM protests are good and don’t spread coronavirus at all. You will be publicly shamed if you don’t take part. COVID-19 takes a break for left-wing causes. — Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) June 3, 2020
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me.
Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-06-03--Google Blocks Chinese-App Remover From Store

In apparent solidarity with China , Google has blocked an app from its store that removes ‘ made in China ’ software from a smartphone .
The app , aptly named ‘ Remove China Apps , ’ was very popular in India amid increasing tensions between that country and China , according to Bloomberg .
“ After a smartphone user downloads the software , it helps identify the country of origin for apps installed on the phone , highlighting Chinese ones and suggesting steps for removal , ” the outlet reported .
“ A Google spokesman said the removal was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Evidently the policy was written with political kowtowing to China in mind because it ’ s not clear how such a policy would exist otherwise .
This is all the more obvious given that , according to Bloomberg , Google also blocked a competitor app to the Beijing-based TikTok claiming it was a violation of a “ policy on repetitive content , ” but realistically , there ’ s plenty of repetitive apps in the Google store , such as weather radar apps for example .
Comically , the app maker responded @ @ @ @ @ @ @ apps manually .
“ TIP : Its easy to find the origin of any app by searching on google by typing < AppName > origin country Now while this incident happened amid a border dispute between India and China , it underscores how Google will react to President Trump moving against Chinese software and hardware over national security issues .
Rex Jones recounts a story where he helped thwart a deranged man who attacked a convenience store clerk .

In apparent solidarity with China, Google has blocked an app from its store that removes ‘made in China’ software from a smartphone.
The app, aptly named ‘Remove China Apps,’ was very popular in India amid increasing tensions between that country and China, according to Bloomberg.
“After a smartphone user downloads the software, it helps identify the country of origin for apps installed on the phone, highlighting Chinese ones and suggesting steps for removal,” the outlet reported. “A Google spokesman said the removal was “’due to policy violations.’”
Evidently the policy was written with political kowtowing to China in mind because it’s not clear how such a policy would exist otherwise.
This is all the more obvious given that, according to Bloomberg, Google also blocked a competitor app to the Beijing-based TikTok claiming it was a violation of a “policy on repetitive content,” but realistically, there’s plenty of repetitive apps in the Google store, such as weather radar apps for example.
Comically, the app maker responded by telling users how to delete Chinese apps manually.
“TIP: Its easy to find the origin of any app by searching on google by typing origin country
Stay Tuned !! Stay Safe!!”
Now while this incident happened amid a border dispute between India and China, it underscores how Google will react to President Trump moving against Chinese software and hardware over national security issues.
Rex Jones recounts a story where he helped thwart a deranged man who attacked a convenience store clerk.


newswars--2020-06-03--Black Americans Killed in Riots Across American Cities

At least four black American men and one biracial woman have been killed in riots wreaking havoc on American cities @ @ @ @ @ Rioting first started on May 28 in Minneapolis , Minnesota , over the death of @ @ @ @ @ allegedly murdered by police officer Derek Chauvin .
Since then , the riots have spread @ @ @ @ @ York City , Los Angeles , Seattle , Portland , Oakland , Louisville , and @ @ @ @ @ have led to more death , especially among black Americans .
The victims include : @ @ @ @ @ Patrick Underwood , 53-years-old , was killed during riots in Oakland , California .
Underwood @ @ @ @ @ was trying to keep the peace during riots when he was fatally shot .
“ @ @ @ @ @ Underwood , a federal officer , was murdered 5/29/20 in Oakland California , while on @ @ @ @ @ ” Underwood ’ s sister wrote on her Facebook page .
“ This Violence Must @ @ @

At least four black American men and one biracial woman have been killed in riots wreaking havoc on American cities over the last week.
Rioting first started on May 28 in Minneapolis, Minnesota, over the death of George Floyd, who was allegedly murdered by police officer Derek Chauvin. Since then, the riots have spread to major cities like New York City, Los Angeles, Seattle, Portland, Oakland, Louisville, and St. Louis.
The riots have led to more death, especially among black Americans. The victims include:
Dave Patrick Underwood
On May 29, Dave Patrick Underwood, 53-years-old, was killed during riots in Oakland, California. Underwood, according to police, was trying to keep the peace during riots when he was fatally shot.
“My brother, Dave Patrick Underwood, a federal officer, was murdered 5/29/20 in Oakland California, while on duty during the riots,” Underwood’s sister wrote on her Facebook page. “This Violence Must Stop.”
Read more
BLM and ANTIFA Release Joker Jubilee Of Violence


newswars--2020-06-03--Riots Expose Virus Lockdown Hoax, Governors Pivot on Mass Gatherings

Old-Thinker News warned in 2016 : “ Soros and his minions will attempt to force Trump ’ s hand to make him fit the election propaganda narrative of being a racist , bigot “ Hitler ” figure.
” Just a few short weeks ago when Americans of diverse backgrounds began to rally peacefully in public against the lockdowns , the media said that the rallies were dangerous , and would lead to a second wave of Coronavirus .
The same governors who imposed harsh penalties for defying lockdown orders now openly endorse mass protests in response to the death of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said that businesses reopening and protesting against his orders were “ cowardly.
” Now , wolf has endorsed the current nationwide protests : “ These demonstrations are right on the mark… We need to protest injustice .
We need to do something about it , and we can ’ t think , yeah , it ’ s just part of the American landscape .
It has been , unfortunately .
But we ’ ve got to change that.
” The same story is unfolding in New Hampshire , where Governor Chris Sununu has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lockdown orders .
Sununu now says “ I called the organizers ahead of the # GeorgeFloyd March in Manchester to let them know the State of NH stands with them in their calls for justice.
” Governors all over the country have followed the same script in an organized insurrection .
The Coronavirus narrative has collapsed .
The CDC ’ s own numbers now show a 0.4 % fatality rate .
Leaked documents from the German government call the virus a “ global false alarm ” .
A coordinated , dangerous political agenda @ @ @ @ @ @ @ warned in 2016 that Trump “ will likely face a crisis moment with Soros paid protesters ” .
As reported : “ A warning to President Trump : You will likely face a crisis moment with Soros paid protesters If Trump does not call out agitator George Soros by name and meaningfully deal with him , Soros will plague his administration relentlessly .
The perception of the President-elect that was perpetuated by the mainstream media ( racist , sexist , “ literally Hitler ” , etc ) has become reality for a sizeable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it is not based in fact .
This is causing real racists and psychotic individuals to act out .
Trump could face a critical choice of action if Soros groups attempt to stage radically violent protests or war on the streets of America .
Soros and his minions will attempt to force Trump ’ s hand to make him fit the election propaganda narrative of being a racist , bigot “ Hitler ” figure.
” The media is now playing this card .
Trump is being cast as a brutal dictator using force @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be on guard against outside forces staging false flag operations .
They could come in the form of an attack against protesters and blamed on military forces .
We do not endorse offensive political violence .
Alex Jones brings out the documents he exposed two years ago detailing an organized effort to create racial division and civil unrest in America funded by George Soros .

Old-Thinker News warned in 2016: “Soros and his minions will attempt to force Trump’s hand to make him fit the election propaganda narrative of being a racist, bigot “Hitler” figure.”
Just a few short weeks ago when Americans of diverse backgrounds began to rally peacefully in public against the lockdowns, the media said that the rallies were dangerous, and would lead to a second wave of Coronavirus.
The same governors who imposed harsh penalties for defying lockdown orders now openly endorse mass protests in response to the death of George Floyd.
Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf said that businesses reopening and protesting against his orders were “cowardly.”
Now, wolf has endorsed the current nationwide protests:
“These demonstrations are right on the mark… We need to protest injustice. We need to do something about it, and we can’t think, yeah, it’s just part of the American landscape. It has been, unfortunately. But we’ve got to change that.”
The same story is unfolding in New Hampshire, where Governor Chris Sununu has also cracked down on citizens who defy lockdown orders.
Sununu now says “I called the organizers ahead of the #GeorgeFloyd March in Manchester to let them know the State of NH stands with them in their calls for justice.”
Governors all over the country have followed the same script in an organized insurrection.
The Coronavirus narrative has collapsed. The CDC’s own numbers now show a 0.4% fatality rate. Leaked documents from the German government call the virus a “global false alarm”.
A coordinated, dangerous political agenda is playing out in America.
I warned in 2016 that Trump “will likely face a crisis moment with Soros paid protesters”. As reported:
“A warning to President Trump: You will likely face a crisis moment with Soros paid protesters
If Trump does not call out agitator George Soros by name and meaningfully deal with him, Soros will plague his administration relentlessly. The perception of the President-elect that was perpetuated by the mainstream media (racist, sexist, “literally Hitler”, etc) has become reality for a sizeable portion of the population, even if it is not based in fact. This is causing real racists and psychotic individuals to act out.
Trump could face a critical choice of action if Soros groups attempt to stage radically violent protests or war on the streets of America. Soros and his minions will attempt to force Trump’s hand to make him fit the election propaganda narrative of being a racist, bigot “Hitler” figure.”
The media is now playing this card. Trump is being cast as a brutal dictator using force against peaceful protesters.
We need to be on guard against outside forces staging false flag operations. They could come in the form of an attack against protesters and blamed on military forces.
We do not endorse offensive political violence.
Alex Jones brings out the documents he exposed two years ago detailing an organized effort to create racial division and civil unrest in America funded by George Soros.