newswars--2020-09-09--The Welfare State Did What Slavery Couldn’t Do

The welfare state has done to black Americans what slavery couldn ’ t do….And that is to destroy the black family .
–Walter E. Williams , the Wall Street Journal On August 14 , the Commission on Social Status of Black Men and Boys Act was signed into law .
It establishes a nineteen-member panel within the Commission on Civil Rights to examine social problems that disproportionately affect black males .
The act is a conscious response to the death of George Floyd , with the opening section of the bill being subtitled the “ George Floyd and Walter Scott @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 25 after a white police officer knelt on his neck for several minutes .
Walter Scott died on April 4 , 2015 , after being shot by a white police officer who had stopped him for a broken brake light .
Both have become symbols of police brutality against black males .
Invoking them indicates that the new commission will focus on the disparity with which law enforcement and the court system treat black males .
Any spotlight shone on the neglected problem of discrimination against males deserves applause .
Higher education is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pendulum has swung from several decades ago , when discrimination against women was rife .
A February 1 article in Forbes , “ The Collegiate War against Males , ” commented on the recent decline in college enrollment .
“ Most of that fall…is concentrated among men .
Between 2015 and 2019…the number of men on campuses declined by 691,643 , almost double the smaller fall among women , 348,955 .
In percentage terms , the male decline of 8.34 % was far more than double that among women , 3.18 % ….In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ women than men , but now the differential is nearly 40 % .
” From family courts to the handling of sexual violence , from protective laws for women to harsh prison sentencing for men , the government unjustly advantages one gender over the other instead of treating all individuals equally under the same law .
The Commission on Social Status of Black Men and Boys is not likely to increase justice , however ; it may well damage the cause it seems to champion .
There is reason for skepticism .
A @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was established in 2001 by Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton ( D-DC ) , who also cochairs the Congressional Caucus on Black Men and Boys .
Predictably , Norton applauds the new act , because it “ mandates government action to help improve the condition of African-American men and boys.
” There are two takeaways from her comment : government will become more deeply involved in directing the lives of black males , and two decades of activity by the first commission has accomplished little .
The government mandate is unfortunate , for several @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of anyone is laudable , but a number of problems exist with the bill ’ s approach .
For one thing , social status refers to a person ’ s standing in a community .
It refers to how highly others in society value a person .
As long as people are nonviolent , the government has no business dictating what or whom they value .
It is akin to mandating what people must think and feel , which is a matter of social control—not justice .
Moreover , the government can elevate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by changing their legal status and treatment .
If the change makes all people equal under just law , then it is an improvement .
If it elevates one class by harming the status of another class , then it is discriminatory and unjust on its face .
There are two basic ways that government can use the law to influence social status .
It can remove any legal entitlements or disadvantages for categories of people and allow the status of each individual to rise or fall on its own .
Or it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ redistributing wealth—by extending privileges and opportunities to one group while denying them to another ; affirmative action in university admission is an example .
The new commission will almost certainly take the latter path .
And the disadvantaged category will almost certainly be white males .
( Women are unlikely to be disadvantaged , because they are still viewed as “ oppressed.
” ) If the new Commission follows the lead of Norton ’ s original one , it will make frequent comparisons between the status of black males and white ones as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ inequity .
If this happens , males will be divided into warring groups—black and white—with one category of males benefiting at the expense of the other , with the interests of both in conflict .
Another objection : the new commission tacitly accepts the idea that there is institutionalized racism in America .
Although racist individuals and organizations certainly exist , America has overwhelmingly purged its institutions of antiblack bias .
Racism is not systemic .
In an article entitled “ Why Social Justice Warriors Battle ‘ Institutional Racism , ’ ” the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ teaches at George Mason University , speculated on the ill-defined terms institutional racism and systemic racism .
He wrote , “ I suspect it means that they can not identify the actual person or entities engaged in the practice….And it is seen by many , particularly the intellectual elite , as a desirable form of determining who gets what.
” On the other hand , a clear-cut misandry or antimale bias does exist in American institutions and culture .
This is especially true of white heterosexual males , who politically lack the intersectional @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or sexual minority .
But the antimale bias also applies to blacks who are disadvantaged simply because of their gender .
In fighting this bias , they should find common cause with white males instead of being politically juxtaposed .
Yet another objection to the commission is that its members almost certainly accept “ the legacy of slavery ” as the cause of any racism in America .
This means it will not address the single most powerful cause of black impoverishment : the decline of the black family , for which government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ theorist Thomas Sowell , who teaches at Stanford University , has written extensively on the decline of the black family .
In his article “ A Legacy of Liberalism , ” Sowell rejects the argument that current black impoverishment is the residue of slavery or due to inherent racism .
He refers to “ the legacy of slavery ” argument as a reason not to think about the subject or rely on evidence , because it replaces research with an emotional reaction .
“ If we wanted to be serious about evidence , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ compare where blacks stood a hundred years after the end of slavery with where they stood after 30 years of the liberal welfare state….Despite the grand myth that black economic progress began or accelerated with the passage of the civil rights laws and ‘ war on poverty ’ programs of the 1960s , the cold fact is that the poverty rate among blacks fell from 87 percent in 1940 to 47 percent by 1960 .
This was before any of those programs began.
” In his article “ The Legacy of the Welfare @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The No .
1 problem among blacks is the effects stemming from a very weak family structure .
Children from fatherless homes are likelier to drop out of high school , die by suicide , have behavioral disorders , join gangs , commit crimes and end up in prison .
They are also likelier to live in poverty-stricken households .
But is the weak black family a legacy of slavery ?
…Here ’ s my question : Was the increase in single-parent black families after 1960 a legacy of slavery , or might @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state ushered in by the War on Poverty ?
” In another article Sowell answered , “ A vastly expanded welfare state in the 1960s destroyed the black family , which had survived centuries of slavery and generations of racial oppression .
In 1960 , before this expansion of the welfare state , 22 percent of black children were raised with only one parent .
By 1985 , 67 percent of black children were raised with either one parent or no parent.
” The percentage has held fairly steady since then .
And @ @ @ @ @ @ @ usually a mother or a grandmother .
Being effectively fatherless can be devastating .
The paper “ What Can the Federal Government Do to Decrease Crime and Revitalize Communities ?
, ” issued by the US Department of Justice , offered statistics on children from fatherless homes .
The children account for : • Runaways : 90 percent of all homeless and runaway youths • Behavioral disorders : 85 percent of all children that exhibit behavioral disorders Lawmakers do black people no favor when they advance a narrative that dismisses the importance of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on government rather than independence as human beings .
As Williams stated , “ The undeniable truth is that neither slavery nor Jim Crow nor the harshest racism has decimated the black family the way the welfare state has….The most damage done to black Americans is inflicted by those politicians , civil rights leaders and academics who assert that every problem confronting blacks is a result of a legacy of slavery and discrimination .
That ’ s a vision that guarantees perpetuity for the problems .
”

The welfare state has done to black Americans what slavery couldn’t do….And that is to destroy the black family. –Walter E. Williams, the Wall Street Journal
On August 14, the Commission on Social Status of Black Men and Boys Act was signed into law. It establishes a nineteen-member panel within the Commission on Civil Rights to examine social problems that disproportionately affect black males.
The act is a conscious response to the death of George Floyd, with the opening section of the bill being subtitled the “George Floyd and Walter Scott Notification Act.” Floyd died on May 25 after a white police officer knelt on his neck for several minutes. Walter Scott died on April 4, 2015, after being shot by a white police officer who had stopped him for a broken brake light. Both have become symbols of police brutality against black males. Invoking them indicates that the new commission will focus on the disparity with which law enforcement and the court system treat black males.
Any spotlight shone on the neglected problem of discrimination against males deserves applause. Higher education is often used to illustrate how far the pendulum has swung from several decades ago, when discrimination against women was rife. A February 1 article in Forbes, “The Collegiate War against Males,” commented on the recent decline in college enrollment. “Most of that fall…is concentrated among men. Between 2015 and 2019…the number of men on campuses declined by 691,643, almost double the smaller fall among women, 348,955. In percentage terms, the male decline of 8.34% was far more than double that among women, 3.18%….In 2015, there were 32% more women than men, but now the differential is nearly 40%.” From family courts to the handling of sexual violence, from protective laws for women to harsh prison sentencing for men, the government unjustly advantages one gender over the other instead of treating all individuals equally under the same law.
The Commission on Social Status of Black Men and Boys is not likely to increase justice, however; it may well damage the cause it seems to champion.
There is reason for skepticism. A DC Commission on Black Men and Boys was established in 2001 by Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC), who also cochairs the Congressional Caucus on Black Men and Boys. Predictably, Norton applauds the new act, because it “mandates government action to help improve the condition of African-American men and boys.” There are two takeaways from her comment: government will become more deeply involved in directing the lives of black males, and two decades of activity by the first commission has accomplished little.
The government mandate is unfortunate, for several reasons.
Improving the status and safety of anyone is laudable, but a number of problems exist with the bill’s approach. For one thing, social status refers to a person’s standing in a community. It refers to how highly others in society value a person. As long as people are nonviolent, the government has no business dictating what or whom they value. It is akin to mandating what people must think and feel, which is a matter of social control—not justice.
Moreover, the government can elevate the social status of a group only by changing their legal status and treatment. If the change makes all people equal under just law, then it is an improvement. If it elevates one class by harming the status of another class, then it is discriminatory and unjust on its face.
There are two basic ways that government can use the law to influence social status. It can remove any legal entitlements or disadvantages for categories of people and allow the status of each individual to rise or fall on its own. Or it can redistribute status—in a manner similar to redistributing wealth—by extending privileges and opportunities to one group while denying them to another; affirmative action in university admission is an example. The new commission will almost certainly take the latter path. And the disadvantaged category will almost certainly be white males. (Women are unlikely to be disadvantaged, because they are still viewed as “oppressed.”) If the new Commission follows the lead of Norton’s original one, it will make frequent comparisons between the status of black males and white ones as a way to “prove” racial inequity. If this happens, males will be divided into warring groups—black and white—with one category of males benefiting at the expense of the other, with the interests of both in conflict.
Another objection: the new commission tacitly accepts the idea that there is institutionalized racism in America. Although racist individuals and organizations certainly exist, America has overwhelmingly purged its institutions of antiblack bias. Racism is not systemic. In an article entitled “Why Social Justice Warriors Battle ‘Institutional Racism,’” the noted black economist Walter Williams, who teaches at George Mason University, speculated on the ill-defined terms institutional racism and systemic racism. He wrote, “I suspect it means that they cannot identify the actual person or entities engaged in the practice….And it is seen by many, particularly the intellectual elite, as a desirable form of determining who gets what.”
On the other hand, a clear-cut misandry or antimale bias does exist in American institutions and culture. This is especially true of white heterosexual males, who politically lack the intersectional “advantage” of being a racial or sexual minority. But the antimale bias also applies to blacks who are disadvantaged simply because of their gender. In fighting this bias, they should find common cause with white males instead of being politically juxtaposed.
Yet another objection to the commission is that its members almost certainly accept “the legacy of slavery” as the cause of any racism in America. This means it will not address the single most powerful cause of black impoverishment: the decline of the black family, for which government bears much responsibility. The black social theorist Thomas Sowell, who teaches at Stanford University, has written extensively on the decline of the black family. In his article “A Legacy of Liberalism,” Sowell rejects the argument that current black impoverishment is the residue of slavery or due to inherent racism. He refers to “the legacy of slavery” argument as a reason not to think about the subject or rely on evidence, because it replaces research with an emotional reaction. “If we wanted to be serious about evidence,” Sowell observed, “we might compare where blacks stood a hundred years after the end of slavery with where they stood after 30 years of the liberal welfare state….Despite the grand myth that black economic progress began or accelerated with the passage of the civil rights laws and ‘war on poverty’ programs of the 1960s, the cold fact is that the poverty rate among blacks fell from 87 percent in 1940 to 47 percent by 1960. This was before any of those programs began.”
In his article “The Legacy of the Welfare State,” Williams agreed. “The No. 1 problem among blacks is the effects stemming from a very weak family structure. Children from fatherless homes are likelier to drop out of high school, die by suicide, have behavioral disorders, join gangs, commit crimes and end up in prison. They are also likelier to live in poverty-stricken households. But is the weak black family a legacy of slavery?…Here’s my question: Was the increase in single-parent black families after 1960 a legacy of slavery, or might it be a legacy of the welfare state ushered in by the War on Poverty?”
In another article Sowell answered, “A vastly expanded welfare state in the 1960s destroyed the black family, which had survived centuries of slavery and generations of racial oppression. In 1960, before this expansion of the welfare state, 22 percent of black children were raised with only one parent. By 1985, 67 percent of black children were raised with either one parent or no parent.” The percentage has held fairly steady since then. And, statistically, the parent figure is usually a mother or a grandmother.
Being effectively fatherless can be devastating. The paper “What Can the Federal Government Do to Decrease Crime and Revitalize Communities?,” issued by the US Department of Justice, offered statistics on children from fatherless homes. The children account for:
Suicide: 63 percent of youth suicides
Runaways: 90 percent of all homeless and runaway youths
Behavioral disorders: 85 percent of all children that exhibit behavioral disorders
High school dropouts: 71 percent of all high school dropouts
Juvenile detention rates: 70 percent of juveniles in state-operated institutions
Substance abuse: 75 percent of adolescent patients in substance abuse centers
Lawmakers do black people no favor when they advance a narrative that dismisses the importance of the family structure and offers instead dependence on government rather than independence as human beings. As Williams stated, “The undeniable truth is that neither slavery nor Jim Crow nor the harshest racism has decimated the black family the way the welfare state has….The most damage done to black Americans is inflicted by those politicians, civil rights leaders and academics who assert that every problem confronting blacks is a result of a legacy of slavery and discrimination. That’s a vision that guarantees perpetuity for the problems.”


newswars--2020-09-09--Where Did the US Government Get the Power to Assassinate People?

In an August editorial , the New York Times called for an investigation into the attack on Russian dissident Aleksei Navalny , who was recently transported to Germany in a coma after apparently being poisoned .
No one knows who did the poisoning , but the Times has strong suspicions : A hit on so prominent a figure , with the inevitable eruption of global and domestic fury , would presumably require sanction from the highest echelons of power….Mr .
Putin has certainly shown no qualms about striking at foes at home and abroad .
But it is equally possible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Russian kleptocracy decided to silence him .
Ramzan Kadyrov , the strongman of the Chechen Republic within Russia , for one , is believed to be responsible for several assassinations , most likely without approval from the Kremlin….Given the murky politics of the Kremlin , it may indeed be that Mr. Putin and his lieutenants did not order the hit on Mr. Navalny , who stands to become a bigger problem as a martyr than he was as a gadfly .
But , as the Russian expression goes , “ You cooked the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , however , the Times fails to address a major issue involved here : the power of a national security state to engage in assassination at all .
The Russian regime is a national-security state type of governmental structure .
That means that the true power of the government is centered in the military-intelligence apparatus , which wields the power to assassinate people .
Such power might not be written into the law , but as a practical matter the military-intelligence establishment wields it , and there is nothing anyone , including the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about it .
That ’ s because in a national security state , the military-intelligence establishment has the omnipotent authority to deal with threats to “ national security ” and because the other parts of the government lack the power to stop it .
The United States is a national security state as well .
Just like in Russia , the US national security state wields the power to confront threats to “ national security.
” Assassination is one of those ways .
As a practical matter , this is an omnipotent power @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interferes with its exercise .
That ’ s because they know that they lack the power to do anything about it .
It wasn ’ t always like that here in the United States .
The country started out as a limited government republic , a type of governmental system that is completely different from a national security state .
Under a limited government republic , the US government lacked the power to assassinate people .
That was reflected not only by the fact that the Constitution did not delegate to the government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the fact that the Bill of Rights expressly prohibits the federal government from killing people without due process of law , e.g .
without first securing a conviction in a trial .
That all changed when the US government was converted into the national security state after World War II .
When the CIA was called into existence in 1947 , people assumed that it was going to simply be an intelligence-gathering agency .
Seizing upon a nebulous phrase that Congress had inserted into the enabling legislation , the CIA maintained from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to assassinate people as a necessary way to protect “ national security.
” The CIA did not waste any time specializing in the art of assassination .
In the 1990s , for example , it was discovered that the CIA was even developing an assassination manual in 1952 for its assassins , which showed not only how to murder people but also in how to cover up CIA involvement in the murder .
That manual can be read online .
Two years later—in 1954—the CIA developed a “ kill list ” of people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s intentional destruction of Guatemala ’ s democratic system in 1954 .
This CIA ’ s omnipotent power to assassinate people came into existence without even the semblance of a constitutional amendment .
It was ostensibly enacted by Congress and later acceded to by the Supreme Court .
What some American fail to realize is that the US government ’ s power to assassinate extends to assassinating American citizens , just like it does with Russian citizens under their national security state .
Once the CIA or , for that matter , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , foreign or American , poses a threat to “ national security , ” he can be assassinated and there is nothing anyone can do about it , just like , as a practical matter , there is nothing anyone can do about the Russian government ’ s power to assassinate its citizens .
The Times ’ s editorial has an interesting ending : Let us hope that the investigation into Mr. Navalny ’ s case is quick and thorough , and that the president of the United States has the fortitude to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t help but wonder if the Times is referring to an investigation carried out by the US government or some other government .
I also find it interesting that the Times says that punishment should occur after an investigation rather than after a trial .
Finally , I can ’ t help but wonder if the Times , after such an investigation , would support punishing the accused with a US state-sponsored assassination .

In an August editorial, the New York Times called for an investigation into the attack on Russian dissident Aleksei Navalny, who was recently transported to Germany in a coma after apparently being poisoned.
No one knows who did the poisoning, but the Times has strong suspicions:
A hit on so prominent a figure, with the inevitable eruption of global and domestic fury, would presumably require sanction from the highest echelons of power….Mr. Putin has certainly shown no qualms about striking at foes at home and abroad. But it is equally possible that some other shadowy figure in the Russian kleptocracy decided to silence him. Ramzan Kadyrov, the strongman of the Chechen Republic within Russia, for one, is believed to be responsible for several assassinations, most likely without approval from the Kremlin….Given the murky politics of the Kremlin, it may indeed be that Mr. Putin and his lieutenants did not order the hit on Mr. Navalny, who stands to become a bigger problem as a martyr than he was as a gadfly. But, as the Russian expression goes, “You cooked the kasha, you eat it.”
Unfortunately, however, the Times fails to address a major issue involved here: the power of a national security state to engage in assassination at all.
The Russian regime is a national-security state type of governmental structure. That means that the true power of the government is centered in the military-intelligence apparatus, which wields the power to assassinate people.
Such power might not be written into the law, but as a practical matter the military-intelligence establishment wields it, and there is nothing anyone, including the legislature and the judiciary, can do about it. That’s because in a national security state, the military-intelligence establishment has the omnipotent authority to deal with threats to “national security” and because the other parts of the government lack the power to stop it.
The United States is a national security state as well. Just like in Russia, the US national security state wields the power to confront threats to “national security.” Assassination is one of those ways. As a practical matter, this is an omnipotent power. Neither Congress nor the federal judiciary interferes with its exercise. That’s because they know that they lack the power to do anything about it.
From a Limited Government Republic to a National Security State
It wasn’t always like that here in the United States. The country started out as a limited government republic, a type of governmental system that is completely different from a national security state. Under a limited government republic, the US government lacked the power to assassinate people. That was reflected not only by the fact that the Constitution did not delegate to the government the power of assassination but also by the fact that the Bill of Rights expressly prohibits the federal government from killing people without due process of law, e.g. without first securing a conviction in a trial.
That all changed when the US government was converted into the national security state after World War II. When the CIA was called into existence in 1947, people assumed that it was going to simply be an intelligence-gathering agency. Seizing upon a nebulous phrase that Congress had inserted into the enabling legislation, the CIA maintained from the start that it wielded the omnipotent power to assassinate people as a necessary way to protect “national security.”
The CIA did not waste any time specializing in the art of assassination. In the 1990s, for example, it was discovered that the CIA was even developing an assassination manual in 1952 for its assassins, which showed not only how to murder people but also in how to cover up CIA involvement in the murder. That manual can be read online. Two years later—in 1954—the CIA developed a “kill list” of people to assassinate as part of the CIA’s intentional destruction of Guatemala’s democratic system in 1954.
This CIA’s omnipotent power to assassinate people came into existence without even the semblance of a constitutional amendment. It was ostensibly enacted by Congress and later acceded to by the Supreme Court.
What some American fail to realize is that the US government’s power to assassinate extends to assassinating American citizens, just like it does with Russian citizens under their national security state. Once the CIA or, for that matter, the military, decides that any person, foreign or American, poses a threat to “national security,” he can be assassinated and there is nothing anyone can do about it, just like, as a practical matter, there is nothing anyone can do about the Russian government’s power to assassinate its citizens.
The Times’s editorial has an interesting ending:
Let us hope that the investigation into Mr. Navalny’s case is quick and thorough, and that the president of the United States has the fortitude to punish those responsible.
I can’t help but wonder if the Times is referring to an investigation carried out by the US government or some other government. I also find it interesting that the Times says that punishment should occur after an investigation rather than after a trial. Finally, I can’t help but wonder if the Times, after such an investigation, would support punishing the accused with a US state-sponsored assassination.


newswars--2020-09-09--Joe Biden Bumbles Through Another Awkward Campaign Speech, Takes No Questions

Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden stumbled through another weak speech during a campaign stop in Michigan , coughing throughout while attacking President Trump and then wrapping up without taking questions .
Speaking in Warren on Wednesday to deliver a Trumpesque “ Made In America ” event , Biden attacked Trump for “ lying ” about the coronavirus , referring to audio of Trump telling liberal journalist Bob Woodward he downplayed the virus to prevent panic .
It didn ’ t take long for Biden to utter another meandering , nonsensical sentence about Trump ’ s America First policies .
At @ @ @ @ @ @ @ defended globalism while at the same time claiming he would revive American manufacturing , which received a few solitary claps from the audience .
Biden was also seen frequently coughing into his hand while speaking .
After his speech , the Democrat nominee quickly left the podium without taking a single question .
All in all , another predictable appearance by the ailing Democrat candidate .
Owen Shroyer And DeAnna Lorraine watch as Trump concludes his second rally of the day , as Biden is barely able to stay away through his garden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people .

Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden stumbled through another weak speech during a campaign stop in Michigan, coughing throughout while attacking President Trump and then wrapping up without taking questions.
Speaking in Warren on Wednesday to deliver a Trumpesque “Made In America” event, Biden attacked Trump for “lying” about the coronavirus, referring to audio of Trump telling liberal journalist Bob Woodward he downplayed the virus to prevent panic.
Joe Biden reacts to revelations from Bob Woodward’s book that Trump concealed critical detail about the coronavirus. “He knew and purposely played it down. … He knowingly and willingly lied about the threat it posed to the country for months” https://t.co/BfoWL4UaMV pic.twitter.com/1RFrKRV3Ws — CNN Politics (@CNNPolitics) September 9, 2020
It didn’t take long for Biden to utter another meandering, nonsensical sentence about Trump’s America First policies.
.@JoeBiden: “He promised his admin would enforce every last buy-in American provision… and what makes his wild claims and hopes—he now hopes we don’t notice what he said, or won’t remember. And when he does follow through, or doesn’t do—when follow through, the exact opposite.” pic.twitter.com/EF4VP6QN9P — Breitbart News (@BreitbartNews) September 9, 2020
At one point during his speech, Biden defended globalism while at the same time claiming he would revive American manufacturing, which received a few solitary claps from the audience.
In Michigan, Democratic nominee Joe Biden says, “Getting a good job in 2020, right here in America, shouldn’t be a lottery. It should be an absolute expectation for everyone” pic.twitter.com/NXI4JOd1Qd — CNN Politics (@CNNPolitics) September 9, 2020
Biden was also seen frequently coughing into his hand while speaking.
He might want to get this checked out pic.twitter.com/BLpCz2eK5B — Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) September 9, 2020
After his speech, the Democrat nominee quickly left the podium without taking a single question.
Joe Biden ends another event without taking questions (2020, colorized) pic.twitter.com/Jw4nLyf17F — Chris Martin (@chrisjdmartin) September 9, 2020
All in all, another predictable appearance by the ailing Democrat candidate.
Owen Shroyer And DeAnna Lorraine watch as Trump concludes his second rally of the day, as Biden is barely able to stay away through his garden party interview with an audience of four people.


newswars--2020-09-09--“Enter At Your Own Risk!”: Billboard Warns Austin Visitors to Beware Due to Defunded Police Force

Billboards posted near the Austin city limits warn motorists traveling to the Texas capitol to do so at their own risk , after the city council voted to defund the police department last month .
“ Warning !
” caution the bulletins posted along the I-35 corridor .
“ Austin Police Defunded , ” it reads in giant red letters .
“ Enter at your own risk !
” The billboard , which also features the hashtag # BackTheBlue , was commissioned by The Texas Municipal Police Association ( TMPA ) , which dubs itself “ the Voice of Texas @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ precise locations from News4SanAntonio.com : One is placed on the west side of I-35 , facing north , one mile south of FM 1325 .
Another is on the west side of I-35 , facing south , just north of Burleson in Kyle , before exit 248 .
The sign criticizes the Democrat-run Austin City Council ’ s decision last month to cut the police department budget by $ 150 million , taking dozens of officers off the streets and transferring the funds to social service programs .
“ Beginning in October @ @ @ @ @ @ @ social services , community resources including response to the coronavirus , mental health aid programs , violence prevention , victim services and food , housing and abortion access , ” the AP reported last month .
The billboard comes as Gov .
Greg Abbott ( R-TX ) last week proposed allowing the state to take control of the Austin Police Department .
In a statement , TMPA Executive Director Kevin Lawrence praised the move and emphasized the billboard ’ s message .
“ The safety of Austin citizens and visitors has never been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by their own locally elected officials , ” Lawrence said .
“ We applaud Governor Abbott ’ s consideration of a legislative proposal that would put the control of the Austin Police Department under state authority.
” Meanwhile , Gov .
Abbott is asking “ every Texan & every candidate for public office ” across the state to sign a pledge to “ Back the Blue ” and “ oppose any efforts to defund the police.
” If you think Texas is the last bastion of freedom , don ’ t move to @ @

Billboards posted near the Austin city limits warn motorists traveling to the Texas capitol to do so at their own risk, after the city council voted to defund the police department last month.
“Warning!” caution the bulletins posted along the I-35 corridor.
“Austin Police Defunded,” it reads in giant red letters. “Enter at your own risk!”
New: ‘Enter at your own risk!’ billboards sponsored by @TMPALegislative are now up along I-35 in Austin. The City Council voted to immediately cut the APD budget by $20 million and transition $130 million in services away from police oversight. @KXAN_News pic.twitter.com/1hoMKg6M2F — John Engel (@EngelsAngle) September 9, 2020
The billboard, which also features the hashtag #BackTheBlue, was commissioned by The Texas Municipal Police Association (TMPA), which dubs itself “the Voice of Texas Law Enforcement.”
More on the signs’ precise locations from News4SanAntonio.com:
One is placed on the west side of I-35, facing north, one mile south of FM 1325.
Another is on the west side of I-35, facing south, just north of Burleson in Kyle, before exit 248.
The sign criticizes the Democrat-run Austin City Council’s decision last month to cut the police department budget by $150 million, taking dozens of officers off the streets and transferring the funds to social service programs.
“Beginning in October, about $21 million will fund social services, community resources including response to the coronavirus, mental health aid programs, violence prevention, victim services and food, housing and abortion access,” the AP reported last month.
The billboard comes as Gov. Greg Abbott (R-TX) last week proposed allowing the state to take control of the Austin Police Department.
In a statement, TMPA Executive Director Kevin Lawrence praised the move and emphasized the billboard’s message.
“The safety of Austin citizens and visitors has never been more at risk from dangerous policies propagated by their own locally elected officials,” Lawrence said. “We applaud Governor Abbott’s consideration of a legislative proposal that would put the control of the Austin Police Department under state authority.”
Meanwhile, Gov. Abbott is asking “every Texan & every candidate for public office” across the state to sign a pledge to “Back the Blue” and “oppose any efforts to defund the police.”
Some want to defund our police — but we can’t allow it. I’m calling on every Texan & every candidate for public office to join me in signing a pledge AGAINST defunding police tomorrow at 2 PM CT. Download the pledge at https://t.co/XSAg8PLKH2 & share using #TexasBacksTheBlue pic.twitter.com/C25910tLSO — Greg Abbott (@GregAbbott_TX) September 9, 2020
Follow the author on Gab: https://gab.ai/adansalazar
On Twitter: Follow @AdanSalazarWins
On Parler: https://parler.com/profile/adansalazar/
On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/adan.salazar.735
On Minds: https://www.minds.com/adan_infowars
If you think Texas is the last bastion of freedom, don’t move to Austin.


newswars--2020-09-09--WATCH: Journalist Patrick Howley Assaulted, Banned From Menards For Not Wearing A Mask

I was banned for life from the Menards chain of home improvement stores after I chose not to wear a Scamdemic mask in the store , in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act .
The Menards employees refused to recognize the Americans with Disabilities Act and instead banned me for life from the store after I was attacked by a rage-filled mask normie who also followed my friend and I out to our vehicle .
Fun times in New America !
ENJOY !
( NOTE : The Video Cuts Out Around The 7 Minute Mark , Simply Go Back @ @ @ @ @ @ @ timestamp to see the deranged attack on me ) .
The Centers for Disease Control ( CDC ) acknowledges the closer you are to others , the greater the need to wear a mask or face covering to prevent the spread of COVID-19 .
To demonstrate our commitment to the safety of our Guests and Team Members , all shoppers and workers will follow the CDC guidelines of wearing a mask or face covering when in our stores .
We provide face masks to our Team Members and have single masks available for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ service desk by the store entrance .
We are requiring Guests and Team Members to wear masks while shopping at all store locations .
However , the CDC specifically advises against confronting those not wearing masks : The CDC ’ s new guidelines are intended to promote face coverings , while defusing confrontations with people who refuse to wear face coverings .
Some of the suggestions include : – Offering customers options that minimize their contact with other customers , such as curbside pickup , personal shoppers or home delivery

I was banned for life from the Menards chain of home improvement stores after I chose not to wear a Scamdemic mask in the store, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act.
The Menards employees refused to recognize the Americans with Disabilities Act and instead banned me for life from the store after I was attacked by a rage-filled mask normie who also followed my friend and I out to our vehicle.
Fun times in New America! ENJOY! (NOTE: The Video Cuts Out Around The 7 Minute Mark, Simply Go Back And Start Playing It After the 7-minute timestamp to see the deranged attack on me).
How To Not Wear A Mask At Store https://t.co/Ax3eWHDNCR — Patrick Howley (@HowleyReporter) September 8, 2020
From the Menards website:
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) acknowledges the closer you are to others, the greater the need to wear a mask or face covering to prevent the spread of COVID-19. To demonstrate our commitment to the safety of our Guests and Team Members, all shoppers and workers will follow the CDC guidelines of wearing a mask or face covering when in our stores. We provide face masks to our Team Members and have single masks available for purchase for a nominal charge at the service desk by the store entrance. We are requiring Guests and Team Members to wear masks while shopping at all store locations.
However, the CDC specifically advises against confronting those not wearing masks:


newswars--2020-09-09--Professor on Antifa Execution of Trump Supporter in Portland: “He Killed a Fascist. I See Nothing Wr

Professor on Antifa Execution of Trump Supporter in Portland: “He Killed a Fascist. I See Nothing Wrong With It”

University of Rhode Island Professor Erik Loomis reacted to the execution of Trump supporter Aaron “ Jay ” Danielson on the streets of Portland by an Antifa extremist by commenting , “ He killed a fascist .
I see nothing wrong with it.
” In an article entitled ‘ Why was Michael Reinoehl killed ?
’ Loomis laments the fact that Danielson ’ s murderer died at the hands of police officers after brandishing a weapon .
“ I am extremely anti-conspiracy theory , ” wrote Loomis .
“ But it ’ s not a conspiracy theory at this point @ @ @ @ @ @ @ simply murdered him .
The police is [ sic ] shot through with fascists from stem to stern .
They were openly working with the fascists in Portland , as they were in Kenosha which led to dead protestors.
” Loomis was challenged in the comment section of the blog post , with one respondent telling the professor , “ Erik , he shot and killed a guy.
” “ He killed a fascist .
I see nothing wrong with it , at least from a moral perspective , ” Loomis responded .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Danielson ’ s execution by saying it was morally right for slaves to assassinate their slaveowners hundreds of years ago .
Notice how Loomis justifies cold blooded murder by dehumanizing Danielson as a “ fascist , ” ironically just as fascists justified the killing of Jews during World War II by dehumanizing them as “ rats ” and “ less than human.
” Reminder ; These are the people teaching your children .
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch .
I need you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ here .
Also , I urgently need your financial support here .

University of Rhode Island Professor Erik Loomis reacted to the execution of Trump supporter Aaron “Jay” Danielson on the streets of Portland by an Antifa extremist by commenting, “He killed a fascist. I see nothing wrong with it.”
In an article entitled ‘Why was Michael Reinoehl killed?’ Loomis laments the fact that Danielson’s murderer died at the hands of police officers after brandishing a weapon.
“I am extremely anti-conspiracy theory,” wrote Loomis. “But it’s not a conspiracy theory at this point in time to wonder if the cops simply murdered him. The police is [sic] shot through with fascists from stem to stern. They were openly working with the fascists in Portland, as they were in Kenosha which led to dead protestors.”
Loomis was challenged in the comment section of the blog post, with one respondent telling the professor, “Erik, he shot and killed a guy.”
“He killed a fascist. I see nothing wrong with it, at least from a moral perspective,” Loomis responded.
The professor went on to further justify Danielson’s execution by saying it was morally right for slaves to assassinate their slaveowners hundreds of years ago.
Notice how Loomis justifies cold blooded murder by dehumanizing Danielson as a “fascist,” ironically just as fascists justified the killing of Jews during World War II by dehumanizing them as “rats” and “less than human.”
Reminder; These are the people teaching your children.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Also, I urgently need your financial support here.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-09-09--Former Intel Chief Renews Russia Hoax, Claims ‘Putin Had Something On Trump’

Top Deep State officials railed against their former boss in liberal journalist Bob Woodward ’ s new book , renewing the Russia collusion hoax and claiming President Trump is “ dangerous ” and “ unfit ” for a second term .
In the upcoming book “ Rage ” , former Defense Secretary James Mattis , former Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats , and former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson all disparaged Trump for his foreign policy shift away from endless wars and interventionist-driven decision-making .
In one particularly questionable excerpt , Woodward wrote that Coats “ continued to harbor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ grown rather than lessened , although unsupported by intelligence proof , that Putin had something on Trump.
” Woodward noted that Coats believed Putin was blackmailing Trump despite finding “ no proof , period.
” Coats and his team “ examined the intelligence as carefully as possible , ” Woodward writes .
“ There was no proof , period .
But Coats ’ s doubts continued , never fully dissipating.
” “ How else to explain the president ’ s behavior ?
Coats could see no other explanation , ” Woodward wrote .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ chosen to play on the dark side — the moneyed interests in the New York real estate culture , and international finance with its corrupt , anything-to-make-a-buck dealmaking .
Anything to get ahead , anything to make a deal.
” Not only did Coats not find any evidence of such an outrageous claim , but the FBI “ Crossfire Hurricane ” probe and special counsel Robert Mueller also found zero evidence of “ Russian collusion ” , as thoroughly described in the Justice Department Inspector General ’ s 2018 report .
Mattis and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s pivot away from military-industrial complex policy , with Mattis claiming Trump is “ dangerous ” and “ unfit ” , and Tillerson calling Kushner ’ s role in Middle East peace negotiations “ nauseating to watch.
” Trump called out the military-industrial complex during a press conference Monday , saying that the Pentagon leadership was likely upset that he was disrupting the defense contractors ’ bottom line .
These Deep State remarks surfaced just as the Trump administration brokered a historic peace agreement between Israel and the United Arab Emirates , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from Iraq and Afghanistan .
Former NSA Technical Director and whistleblower , Bill Binney , gives definitive proof that Russia could not have hacked the DNC or John Podesta and refutes the politicized narrative conceived by the Deep State .

Top Deep State officials railed against their former boss in liberal journalist Bob Woodward’s new book, renewing the Russia collusion hoax and claiming President Trump is “dangerous” and “unfit” for a second term.
In the upcoming book “Rage”, former Defense Secretary James Mattis, former Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, and former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson all disparaged Trump for his foreign policy shift away from endless wars and interventionist-driven decision-making.
In one particularly questionable excerpt, Woodward wrote that Coats “continued to harbor the secret belief, one that had grown rather than lessened, although unsupported by intelligence proof, that Putin had something on Trump.”
Woodward noted that Coats believed Putin was blackmailing Trump despite finding “no proof, period.”
Coats and his team “examined the intelligence as carefully as possible,” Woodward writes. “There was no proof, period. But Coats’s doubts continued, never fully dissipating.”
“How else to explain the president’s behavior? Coats could see no other explanation,” Woodward wrote. “He was sure that Trump had chosen to play on the dark side — the moneyed interests in the New York real estate culture, and international finance with its corrupt, anything-to-make-a-buck dealmaking. Anything to get ahead, anything to make a deal.”
Not only did Coats not find any evidence of such an outrageous claim, but the FBI “Crossfire Hurricane” probe and special counsel Robert Mueller also found zero evidence of “Russian collusion”, as thoroughly described in the Justice Department Inspector General’s 2018 report.
Mattis and Tillerson also weighed in on Trump’s pivot away from military-industrial complex policy, with Mattis claiming Trump is “dangerous” and “unfit”, and Tillerson calling Kushner’s role in Middle East peace negotiations “nauseating to watch.”
Trump called out the military-industrial complex during a press conference Monday, saying that the Pentagon leadership was likely upset that he was disrupting the defense contractors’ bottom line.
Trump: "I'm not saying the military's in love with me. The soldiers are. The top people in the Pentagon probably aren't because they want to do nothing but fight wars, so all of those wonderful companies that make the bombs and make the planes and make everything else stay happy" pic.twitter.com/uu1UnBnHbT — CBS News (@CBSNews) September 7, 2020
These Deep State remarks surfaced just as the Trump administration brokered a historic peace agreement between Israel and the United Arab Emirates, and announced a further reduction in U.S. forces from Iraq and Afghanistan.
Twitter: Follow @WhiteIsTheFury
Parler: https://parler.com/profile/WhiteIsTheFury/posts
Gab: https://gab.com/WhiteIsTheFury
Minds: https://www.minds.com/whiteisthefury
Former NSA Technical Director and whistleblower, Bill Binney, gives definitive proof that Russia could not have hacked the DNC or John Podesta and refutes the politicized narrative conceived by the Deep State.


newswars--2020-09-09--High School Student Suspended for Attending Class In-Person

A high school senior in New York state was suspended for attempting to show up and attend classes in-person .
Maverick Stow , 17 , showed up to William Floyd High School in Long Island on the first day of school , September 8 , eager to start his last year of high school .
Stow got a temperature check and proceeded to go to his first period course , where the teacher noted he was not listed on the roster .
After being sent to the principle ’ s office , he was instructed to leave the school and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Stow says he shot back , “ ‘ Well , no , I think I need to go to class .
This is during class time , ’ ” and went back to class .
“ He finished classes the rest of the day unimpeded , but at the end of the day school officials informed him he was being suspended for five days ” for insubordination , reports WABC .
The suspension came as a shock to the student , who called the punishment unacceptable .
“ I was going to school @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
I think that a five-day suspension is out of line , ” Stow told WABC .
Both his parents expressed outrage at the school ’ s decision , arguing students should be returning to classes despite the coronavirus restrictions .
“ My son is being suspended because he wants to be in school , ” Stow ’ s mom said .
“ Kids need to be in school every day .
Virtual learning is not learning.
” Stow ’ s dad added , “ He ’ s a very smart kid .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
When he said this is how he wanted to handle things , we were like , ‘ Then go for it.
’ ” Reached for comment , a representative for the William Floyd school district stood by its decision to punish the boy , claiming students are required to observe their “ in-person days ” to reduce the risk of coronavirus transmission .
“ In order to adhere to these guidelines , it is imperative that students attend school during their scheduled in-person days only .
Students who refuse to adhere to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ directives to leave school grounds and cause a disruptive environment for other students , will face disciplinary actions , ” said the district ’ s Public Relations Director , James Montalto .
Stow responded to the school ’ s statement with logic and reason , arguing , “ The virus doesn ’ t discriminate on Mondays or Tuesdays or Thursdays or Fridays .
That ’ s not how it works.
” The bait-and-switch tyranny of college , the lunacy of school buses in COVID era

A high school senior in New York state was suspended for attempting to show up and attend classes in-person.
Maverick Stow, 17, showed up to William Floyd High School in Long Island on the first day of school, September 8, eager to start his last year of high school.
Stow got a temperature check and proceeded to go to his first period course, where the teacher noted he was not listed on the roster.
After being sent to the principle’s office, he was instructed to leave the school and resume online classes at home, but Stow says he shot back, “‘Well, no, I think I need to go to class. This is during class time,’” and went back to class.
“He finished classes the rest of the day unimpeded, but at the end of the day school officials informed him he was being suspended for five days” for insubordination, reports WABC.
The suspension came as a shock to the student, who called the punishment unacceptable.
“I was going to school like students should be going to school. I think that a five-day suspension is out of line,” Stow told WABC.
Both his parents expressed outrage at the school’s decision, arguing students should be returning to classes despite the coronavirus restrictions.
“My son is being suspended because he wants to be in school,” Stow’s mom said.
“Kids need to be in school every day. Virtual learning is not learning.”
Stow’s dad added, “He’s a very smart kid. He knows what he’s doing. When he said this is how he wanted to handle things, we were like, ‘Then go for it.’”
Reached for comment, a representative for the William Floyd school district stood by its decision to punish the boy, claiming students are required to observe their “in-person days” to reduce the risk of coronavirus transmission.
“In order to adhere to these guidelines, it is imperative that students attend school during their scheduled in-person days only. Students who refuse to adhere to their scheduled in-person days and/or flagrantly disregard directives to leave school grounds and cause a disruptive environment for other students, will face disciplinary actions,” said the district’s Public Relations Director, James Montalto.
Stow responded to the school’s statement with logic and reason, arguing, “The virus doesn’t discriminate on Mondays or Tuesdays or Thursdays or Fridays. That’s not how it works.”
Follow the author on Gab: https://gab.ai/adansalazar
On Twitter: Follow @AdanSalazarWins
On Parler: https://parler.com/profile/adansalazar/
On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/adan.salazar.735
On Minds: https://www.minds.com/adan_infowars
The bait-and-switch tyranny of college, the lunacy of school buses in COVID era


newswars--2020-09-09--Nolte: CNN Uses Soviet-Style Airbrushing to Erase Redskins Logo from ’70s Biden Photo

“ CNN appears to have altered a widely seen photograph of Joe Biden with his young son to remove the @ @ @ @ @ , ” reports Fox News .
Before I get into the details , do yourself @ @ @ @ @ on this… If CNNLOL is willing to go to all the trouble to lie about @ @ @ @ @ protect Joe Biden and to defeat Trump , imagine the lengths CNNLOL is currently going @ @ @ @ @ and gaslight over big things .
Stuff that matters .
Thought of that should put @ @ @ @ @ spine .
In June , on Father ’ s Day , Biden , the Democrat @ @ @ @ @ a photo of himself and his young son , a sweet photo of the boy @ @ @ @ @ ’ s arms .
The little boy is wearing a hat with a Redskins logo @

“CNN appears to have altered a widely seen photograph of Joe Biden with his young son to remove the logo of the Washington Redskins,” reports Fox News.
Before I get into the details, do yourself a quick favor and mull on this…
If CNNLOL is willing to go to all the trouble to lie about little things like this to protect Joe Biden and to defeat Trump, imagine the lengths CNNLOL is currently going to to lie and mislead and gaslight over big things. Stuff that matters. Thought of that should put a chill straight up your spine.
In June, on Father’s Day, Biden, the Democrat nominee for president, shared a photo of himself and his young son, a sweet photo of the boy lying comfortably in his father’s arms. The little boy is wearing a hat with a Redskins logo.
Read More


newswars--2020-09-09--The Democratic Plan To Seize Total Power Exposed

President Trump is taking fire from all sides as he continues to reassure the country that he won ’ t @ @ @ @ @ Joe Biden ’ s faction of power-hungry New World Order goons is wargaming how to @ @ @ @ @ is reelected .
As Jamie White reports , “ A far-left coalition war-gamed several post-election @ @ @ @ @ case Democrat candidate Joe Biden lost to President Trump , predicting that Infowars would get @ @ @ @ @ electors and linking 88 of these electors to Soros and 14 to child sex trafficking.
@ @ @ @ @ professional sleazeball Michael Cohen , who is on house arrest due to tax evasion and @ @ @ @ @ tarnish the President ’ s image and Biden doubles down on his lies utilizing the @ @ @ @ @ public is too stupid to know the difference .

President Trump is taking fire from all sides as he continues to reassure the country that he won’t stop fighting.
Meanwhile, Joe Biden’s faction of power-hungry New World Order goons is wargaming how to take power even if Trump is reelected.
As Jamie White reports, “A far-left coalition war-gamed several post-election ‘apocalyptic’ scenarios in case Democrat candidate Joe Biden lost to President Trump, predicting that Infowars would get involved by doxxing Joe Biden electors and linking 88 of these electors to Soros and 14 to child sex trafficking.”
All of this as professional sleazeball Michael Cohen, who is on house arrest due to tax evasion and campaign violations, attempts to tarnish the President’s image and Biden doubles down on his lies utilizing the Democrats m.o. that the public is too stupid to know the difference.


newswars--2020-09-09--Listen: Kyle Rittenhouse Folks Songs Celebrate The “Kenosha Kid”

The folks over at Revolver.news compiled a list of Kyle Rittenhouse folk songs uploaded to commemorate the “ Kenosha Kid @ @ @ @ @ rioters who were attacking him in Wisconsin last month .
Check out these odes to @ @ @ @ @ to spread the melodies to your friends and family so they can join the culture @ @

The folks over at Revolver.news compiled a list of Kyle Rittenhouse folk songs uploaded to commemorate the “Kenosha Kid” after he shot multiple rioters who were attacking him in Wisconsin last month.
Check out these odes to Kyle and share this link to spread the melodies to your friends and family so they can join the culture war.


newswars--2020-09-09--Sky News Host Leads Resistance Against Covid-19 Scam

A popular Sky News host warns that politicians are exploiting the Covid-19 crisis to control people ’ s lives , and he points out that only 9 % of deaths attributed to Covid-19 in Australia were due to Covid-19 alone .
Alan Jones said the central issue is politicians over-exaggerating the risk of Covid-19 to gain permanent , totalitarian control over how people live their lives .
“ This is the mess you get into if you allow politicians to control your lives , ” he continued .
“ I don ’ t .
This has been badly managed and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Economic , financial , emotional and mental destruction.
” Although Jones was speaking to his Australian audience , his argument applies across the world as it ’ s revealed that Covid-19 is far less deadly than what politicians worldwide were claiming .
“ This is a ruthless , heartless abuse of power exercised by ignorant , know-all politicians , ” he said .
“ How do you handcuff a pregnant mother , but allow 10,000 people to gather for Black Lives Matter ?
” Jones was referring to the viral video showing Australian @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the lockdowns on social media .
More recently , Australian police arrested an elderly woman for not wearing a mask as she sat alone in a park .
“ Stop taking about the number of cases , tell us how many people who tested positive are critical , ” he added , directed to the country ’ s politicians .
“ On those figures , across Australia there are [ only ] 29.
” “ And here ’ s [ Premier of Victoria Daniel ] Andrews saying five million Melburnians will remain stay-at-home @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no businesses , [ and all of them ] locked up at a 8 o ’ clock curfew at night until there are fewer than five cases detected a day.
” Alex Jones breaks down all the key-points that reveal how the COVID scamdemic is falling apart .

A popular Sky News host warns that politicians are exploiting the Covid-19 crisis to control people’s lives, and he points out that only 9% of deaths attributed to Covid-19 in Australia were due to Covid-19 alone.
Alan Jones said the central issue is politicians over-exaggerating the risk of Covid-19 to gain permanent, totalitarian control over how people live their lives.
“This is the mess you get into if you allow politicians to control your lives,” he continued. “I don’t. This has been badly managed and avoidable… So what do we have? Economic, financial, emotional and mental destruction.”
Although Jones was speaking to his Australian audience, his argument applies across the world as it’s revealed that Covid-19 is far less deadly than what politicians worldwide were claiming.
“This is a ruthless, heartless abuse of power exercised by ignorant, know-all politicians,” he said. “How do you handcuff a pregnant mother, but allow 10,000 people to gather for Black Lives Matter?”
Jones was referring to the viral video showing Australian police arresting a pregnant mother for criticizing the lockdowns on social media.
Meanwhile, in Melbourne…
Pregnant mum arrested in front of her children & all her devices/computers seized because of a Facebook post about a proposed lockdown protest..
pic.twitter.com/CuFyQzwxHp — Rita Panahi (@RitaPanahi) September 2, 2020
More recently, Australian police arrested an elderly woman for not wearing a mask as she sat alone in a park.
Australian Police wanting to arrest 2 elderly women sitting in a park, watch as one of the Police officers grabs the women’s phone as she is recording. pic.twitter.com/w9mOqThiHk — DJ SPIRAL (@DJSPIRAL_) September 7, 2020
“Stop taking about the number of cases, tell us how many people who tested positive are critical,” he added, directed to the country’s politicians. “On those figures, across Australia there are [only] 29.”
“And here’s [Premier of Victoria Daniel] Andrews saying five million Melburnians will remain stay-at-home, no education for the children, no businesses, [and all of them] locked up at a 8 o’clock curfew at night until there are fewer than five cases detected a day.”
Alex Jones breaks down all the key-points that reveal how the COVID scamdemic is falling apart.


newswars--2020-09-09--Women Who Stole Boy’s MAGA Hat Face Hate Crime Charges

Two women arrested for stealing a Make America Great Again hat from a 7-year-old boy are facing hate crime charges , according to reports .
The incident , which took place outside the Democrat National Convention in Delaware last month , went viral after the boy ’ s mother filmed herself attempting to retrieve the hat from the women .
Olivia M. Winslow , 21 , and Camryn Amy , also 21 , were indicted Tuesday on various charges , including “ robbery , conspiracy and hate crimes , as well as a misdemeanor charge of endangering the welfare of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ York Post .
The latter faces additional misdemeanor charges for punching a man and assaulting the boy ’ s mom as they attempted to recover the hat , in addition to “ offensive touching of a child.
” According to the indictment , the women are accused of committing the acts “ for the purpose of interfering with the victim ’ s free exercise or enjoyment of any right , privilege or immunity protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution , or committed said crime because the victim had exercised @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Delaware Attorney General Kathleen Jennings chastised the violence allegedly exhibited by Winslow and Amy .
“ Violence in any form is unacceptable , but harming another person – let alone a child – because of the expression of their views betrays the principles on which our country was founded , ” Jennings said in a statement .
“ Free speech , free assembly , and free expression are sacred , no matter whether we agree with the opinions expressed , and especially when we don ’ t. ” Footage showing Winslow and Amy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ son last month as the boy cried outraged the pro-Trump community , leading to calls for justice .
Earlier this month , the president sent the victim , 7-year-old Riley , a care package containing various pro-Trump gear , including an autographed Make America Great Again hat .

Two women arrested for stealing a Make America Great Again hat from a 7-year-old boy are facing hate crime charges, according to reports.
The incident, which took place outside the Democrat National Convention in Delaware last month, went viral after the boy’s mother filmed herself attempting to retrieve the hat from the women.
Olivia M. Winslow, 21, and Camryn Amy, also 21, were indicted Tuesday on various charges, including “robbery, conspiracy and hate crimes, as well as a misdemeanor charge of endangering the welfare of a child,” reports the New York Post.
The latter faces additional misdemeanor charges for punching a man and assaulting the boy’s mom as they attempted to recover the hat, in addition to “offensive touching of a child.”
According to the indictment, the women are accused of committing the acts “for the purpose of interfering with the victim’s free exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege or immunity protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, or committed said crime because the victim had exercised or enjoyed said right or rights.”
Delaware Attorney General Kathleen Jennings chastised the violence allegedly exhibited by Winslow and Amy.
“Violence in any form is unacceptable, but harming another person – let alone a child – because of the expression of their views betrays the principles on which our country was founded,” Jennings said in a statement.
“Free speech, free assembly, and free expression are sacred, no matter whether we agree with the opinions expressed, and especially when we don’t.”
Moments ago outside of the DNC convention, Joe Biden supporters attacked a 7 year-old boy. He was attacked simply because he wore a @realDonaldTrump hat. His name is Riley.
Watch it happen.
Listen to him cry. Will Joe condemn this violence against Children? Via @TrumpStudents pic.twitter.com/0624shmPDg — Benny (@bennyjohnson) August 21, 2020
Footage showing Winslow and Amy stealing the hat from the mother and son last month as the boy cried outraged the pro-Trump community, leading to calls for justice.
Earlier this month, the president sent the victim, 7-year-old Riley, a care package containing various pro-Trump gear, including an autographed Make America Great Again hat.


newswars--2020-09-09--Watch Live: Press Sec McEnany Lays Out Trump’s Foreign Policy Victories, Including Ending Wars In Mi

Watch Live: Press Sec McEnany Lays Out Trump’s Foreign Policy Victories, Including Ending Wars In Middle East

White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany held a press briefing Wednesday to deliver updates on President Trump ’ s commitment @ @ @ @ @ endless Middle East wars , including his nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize for brokering @ @ @ @ @ Israel and the United Arab Emirates .

Bill Gates To Dr. Fauci In 2000: ‘Why Don’t We Really Get To Know Each Other Well? We Could Be Partners’


newswars--2020-09-09--Australia: Corona Cops Arrest Grandma Sitting in Park For Not Wearing a Mask

Yet another shock video out of Australia shows police enforcing coronavirus rules by arresting an elderly woman sitting on a park bench for not wearing a mask .
“ This is unlawful , on what grounds am I under arrest ?
” asks the woman .
An officer then walks around the back of the bench and snatches her friend ’ s phone away , preventing her from filming the encounter .
The woman is told that she is being arrested for failing to provide her name and address .
However , as we have seen in numerous other instances @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enforcement of coronavirus rules .
Once a person has been targeted for not wearing a mask or violating any other coronavirus rule , they are asked to provide a name and address so they can be fined .
If they refuse to do so , they are then arrested .
Another video we reported on shows a young woman being dragged to the ground and manhandled by a police officer for not wearing a mask .
Citizens of the state of Victoria in Australia have been subjected to one of the most draconian @ @ @ @ @ @ @ As we highlighted yesterday , a journalist was dragged to the ground and arrested merely for covering an anti-lockdown protest .
A pregnant woman was also arrested in front of her children in her own home for posting about an anti-lockdown protest on Facebook .
Authorities have also given themselves the power to have police remove children from the custody of their parents in order to ensure compliance with coronavirus rules .
Police in Melbourne also announced that they would be using surveillance drones to catch people who don ’ t wear masks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ travel further than 5km from home .
Authorities have also been given the power to enter people ’ s homes without a warrant and perform quarantine spot checks .
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch .
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here .
Also , I urgently need your financial support here .

Yet another shock video out of Australia shows police enforcing coronavirus rules by arresting an elderly woman sitting on a park bench for not wearing a mask.
“This is unlawful, on what grounds am I under arrest?” asks the woman.
An officer then walks around the back of the bench and snatches her friend’s phone away, preventing her from filming the encounter.
The woman is told that she is being arrested for failing to provide her name and address.
Australian Police wanting to arrest 2 elderly women sitting in a park, watch as one of the Police officers grabs the women’s phone as she is recording. pic.twitter.com/w9mOqThiHk — DJ SPIRAL (@DJSPIRAL_) September 7, 2020
However, as we have seen in numerous other instances, this is just part of the enforcement of coronavirus rules.
Once a person has been targeted for not wearing a mask or violating any other coronavirus rule, they are asked to provide a name and address so they can be fined.
If they refuse to do so, they are then arrested.
Another video we reported on shows a young woman being dragged to the ground and manhandled by a police officer for not wearing a mask.
Wait till Chinese-made vaccines are mandatory. pic.twitter.com/aLPb7297tL — Ezra Levant 🍁 (@ezralevant) August 10, 2020
Citizens of the state of Victoria in Australia have been subjected to one of the most draconian COVID-19 lockdowns in the developed world.
As we highlighted yesterday, a journalist was dragged to the ground and arrested merely for covering an anti-lockdown protest.
A pregnant woman was also arrested in front of her children in her own home for posting about an anti-lockdown protest on Facebook.
Authorities have also given themselves the power to have police remove children from the custody of their parents in order to ensure compliance with coronavirus rules.
Police in Melbourne also announced that they would be using surveillance drones to catch people who don’t wear masks and to keep track of cars that travel further than 5km from home.
Authorities have also been given the power to enter people’s homes without a warrant and perform quarantine spot checks.
Police claim they arrested me for not moving when the Police Commander asked me to. Problem is, he NEVER asked me anything. He just ordered the ARREST of a journalist because he doesn’t like what I report. RT the truth. #AviYemini WATCH the full vid👉 https://t.co/6EoL6gD7Dq pic.twitter.com/qQt0DdtPfW — Avi Yemini 🇦🇺🇮🇱 (@OzraeliAvi) September 8, 2020
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Also, I urgently need your financial support here.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-09-09--China Hits Infowars With Massive DDoS Cyberwarfare Attack

Overnight , Infowars.com joined InfowarsStore.com in being on the receiving end of a DDoS ( Distributed Denial of Service ) Attack .
The goal of this type of attack is to take down the web servers that are running the website , rendering it inaccessible to anyone trying to visit it .
Over 18 million requests were detected in the past 12 hours , with the majority of those coming from IP addresses within China .
Additional attacks are coming in from India , Poland , Thailand , Iran , Columbia , Bangladesh , Russia – and some from within @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has been behind attacks on countries around the world , from a surge in cyber attacks against Australia in 2020 , to attempting to hack in and steal COVID-19 research data from US labs .
The latest attack on Infowars is yet another example of Communist China ’ s alliance with the left to censor and shut down free speech , attempting to expand their system of control beyond their own borders .
While your data is encrypted and secure , this aim of this attack is to take Infowars offline and stop @ @ @ @ @ @ @ giants in the US have not only censored Infowars , they are working hand in hand with Communist China to shut down free speech and implement systems of control across the globe .
Your support of Infowars at this time is more crucial than ever .
Share links to the articles and videos with your friends and family , and support us by making a donation or purchasing products at InfowarsStore.com with the Save Infowars Save The Republic Save Yourself Super Sale .
Your data remains secure and encrypted , and your support @ @ @ @ @ @

Overnight, Infowars.com joined InfowarsStore.com in being on the receiving end of a DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service) Attack. The goal of this type of attack is to take down the web servers that are running the website, rendering it inaccessible to anyone trying to visit it. Over 18 million requests were detected in the past 12 hours, with the majority of those coming from IP addresses within China. Additional attacks are coming in from India, Poland, Thailand, Iran, Columbia, Bangladesh, Russia – and some from within the United States.
For years China has been behind attacks on countries around the world, from a surge in cyber attacks against Australia in 2020, to attempting to hack in and steal COVID-19 research data from US labs. The latest attack on Infowars is yet another example of Communist China’s alliance with the left to censor and shut down free speech, attempting to expand their system of control beyond their own borders. While your data is encrypted and secure, this aim of this attack is to take Infowars offline and stop the spread of our broadcasts.
Tech giants in the US have not only censored Infowars, they are working hand in hand with Communist China to shut down free speech and implement systems of control across the globe.
Your support of Infowars at this time is more crucial than ever. Share links to the articles and videos with your friends and family, and support us by making a donation or purchasing products at InfowarsStore.com with the Save Infowars Save The Republic Save Yourself Super Sale. Your data remains secure and encrypted, and your support is essential at this time.


newswars--2020-09-09--Fauci Complains About Lack of Masks At MAGA Rallies

NIH head Anthony Fauci lamented the lack of face masks at recent rallies for President Trump , arguing the administration should “ set the example.
” In an interview with CBS This Morning ’ s Gayle King Wednesday , Fauci blasted the rallies for ignoring social distancing guidelines .
“ The president continues to hold massive rallies where people are not wearing masks , including the president himself , ” King said .
“ When you see that , what do you think ?
Is it frustrating to you as an expert on this ?
” “ Well , yes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ I ’ ve said that often .
That situation — we want to set an example because we know that when you do four or five typical kind of public health measures , masks , physical distance , avoiding crowds , making sure you do most things outdoors versus indoors , those are the kind of things that turn around surges and also prevent us from getting surges .
So I certainly would like to see a universal wearing of masks.
” Of course , Fauci ’ s hypocritical position on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was photographed watching the first MLB game of the season – wearing his mask on his chin .
At the same time , Fauci has all but ignored criticizing leftist BLM protests as potential “ super spreader ” events .
Elsewhere in the CBS interview , Fauci claimed a coronavirus vaccine would likely not be ready until after the election , contrary to timetables put forth by President Trump .
“ It ’ s unlikely that we ’ ll have a definitive answer at that time , ” Fauci said .
“ More @ @ @ @ @ @ @ year .
”

NIH head Anthony Fauci lamented the lack of face masks at recent rallies for President Trump, arguing the administration should “set the example.”
In an interview with CBS This Morning’s Gayle King Wednesday, Fauci blasted the rallies for ignoring social distancing guidelines.
“The president continues to hold massive rallies where people are not wearing masks, including the president himself,” King said. “When you see that, what do you think? Is it frustrating to you as an expert on this?”
“Well, yes, it is,” Fauci answered. “I’ve said that often. That situation — we want to set an example because we know that when you do four or five typical kind of public health measures, masks, physical distance, avoiding crowds, making sure you do most things outdoors versus indoors, those are the kind of things that turn around surges and also prevent us from getting surges. So I certainly would like to see a universal wearing of masks.”
Of course, Fauci’s hypocritical position on masks was exposed in July when he was photographed watching the first MLB game of the season – wearing his mask on his chin.
And there’s Dr. Anthony Fauci showing us all he knows exactly how well masks work! Thanks for the lesson, doc. pic.twitter.com/jdHPzq5HfB — Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) July 24, 2020
At the same time, Fauci has all but ignored criticizing leftist BLM protests as potential “super spreader” events.
Elsewhere in the CBS interview, Fauci claimed a coronavirus vaccine would likely not be ready until after the election, contrary to timetables put forth by President Trump.
“It’s unlikely that we’ll have a definitive answer at that time,” Fauci said. “More likely, by the end of the year.”


newswars--2020-09-09--Corona ‘Marshals’ to Patrol UK Cities to Enforce Social Distancing

A new enforcement team of ‘ Coronavirus Marshals ’ will be employed by the government to patrol cities in order to police social distancing , the UK government has announced .
Last night Downing Street unveiled new lockdown measures making it illegal for people to gather in groups of more than six from Monday onwards .
The rise in COVID-19 cases has been blamed on young people gathering for social events .
This will be tackled by newly empowered ‘ Marshals ’ and ‘ Environmental Health Officers ’ who will roam the streets looking for people violating social distancing rules @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of newly qualified and recently retired Environmental Health Officers ( EHOs ) so that Local Authorities can recruit more quickly and fill any gaps .
In addition , we will introduce COVID-19 Secure Marshals to help local authorities support social distancing in towns and city centres , ” a statement said .
Businesses will also now be mandated to enter customers into NHS ‘ track and trace ’ databases and keep the data for 21 days .
The new measures were brought in despite the fact that coronavirus deaths and hospitalizations have completely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the rise in coronavirus cases is purely down to the fact that many more tests are being done and they ’ re picking up false positives .
There have been 1.3 million coronavirus tests in the UK in the past week alone , compared to just 95,188 in the first week of April .
Despite this crucial factor , nightly news broadcasts are solely focusing on the case numbers to hysterically fearmonger about a “ second wave ” that just isn ’ t happening in reality .
In the age of mass Silicon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stay in touch .
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here .
Also , I urgently need your financial support here .

A new enforcement team of ‘Coronavirus Marshals’ will be employed by the government to patrol cities in order to police social distancing, the UK government has announced.
Last night Downing Street unveiled new lockdown measures making it illegal for people to gather in groups of more than six from Monday onwards.
The rise in COVID-19 cases has been blamed on young people gathering for social events.
This will be tackled by newly empowered ‘Marshals’ and ‘Environmental Health Officers’ who will roam the streets looking for people violating social distancing rules.
“We will launch a register of newly qualified and recently retired Environmental Health Officers (EHOs) so that Local Authorities can recruit more quickly and fill any gaps. In addition, we will introduce COVID-19 Secure Marshals to help local authorities support social distancing in towns and city centres,” a statement said.
Businesses will also now be mandated to enter customers into NHS ‘track and trace’ databases and keep the data for 21 days.
The new measures were brought in despite the fact that coronavirus deaths and hospitalizations have completely flatlined.
As Toby Young explains, the rise in coronavirus cases is purely down to the fact that many more tests are being done and they’re picking up false positives.
There have been 1.3 million coronavirus tests in the UK in the past week alone, compared to just 95,188 in the first week of April.
Despite this crucial factor, nightly news broadcasts are solely focusing on the case numbers to hysterically fearmonger about a “second wave” that just isn’t happening in reality.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Also, I urgently need your financial support here.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-09-09--America Held Hostage: Dems Announce Plan to Burn Down Every US City If Trump Wins – Watch Live

The rioting is directed from the top-down by globalists who don ’ t want America to rise from the ashes @ @ @ @ @ Share this highly censored link to join Infowars in the fight to save free speech @ @ @ @ @ The David Knight Show , guest host Harrison Smith explains how the entire world is @ @ @ @ @ group of globalists using COVID-19 as a pretext for complete tyranny .

The rioting is directed from the top-down by globalists who don’t want America to rise from the ashes. Share this link!
David Knight Show: Colour Revolution to Oust Trump Exposed
Share this highly censored link to join Infowars in the fight to save free speech
On this Wednesday edition of The David Knight Show, guest host Harrison Smith explains how the entire world is being manipulated by a small group of globalists using COVID-19 as a pretext for complete tyranny.


newswars--2020-09-09--Trump to Announce Withdrawal of Additional Troops from Afghanistan & Iraq in Coming Days

US President Donald Trump is poised to announce the pullout of more American troops from Iraq on Wednesday , and from Afghanistan in the coming days , a US official reportedly told the media aboard Air Force One .
The report comes amid Trump ’ s row with Pentagon top brass , who he accused of doing the bidding of the military-industrial complex .
In a widely-publicized remark on Monday , Trump said that the top people in the Pentagon might not be “ in love ” with him “ because they want to do nothing but fight wars.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump ’ s previous pledge to reduce the number of troops in both war-torn countries .
Last month , US Defense Secretary Mark Esper revealed that the number of US troops stationed in Afghanistan would be slashed to less than 5,000 in the coming months .
Trump has said he wants to cap the US contingent on the ground in Afghanistan to no more than 4,000 troops .
“ We ’ re going down to 4,000 , we ’ re negotiating right now… I don ’ t want to tell you ( when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said we will get largely out , ” Trump said last month , noting that he expects between 4,000 and 5,000 troops to be in Afghanistan by Election Day .
The framework for the gradual pullout was set forth in a deal with Taliban , signed on February 29 .
The US has also been scaling down its presence in Iraq , but , as with Afghanistan , it does not plan to leave the country completely .
After Washington and Baghdad fell out over the US ’ killing of top Iranian General @ @ @ @ @ @ @ calls to withdraw , insisting that its presence in the country was “ appropriate.
” Last month , Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr. , the head of the Pentagon ’ s Central Command , said the US expects to keep “ a long-term presence ” in Iraq , purportedly to fight the remnants of Islamic State ( IS , formerly ISIS ) and to prevent Iran from gaining a foothold in the country .
McKenzie said the contingent of 5,200 US troops now in Iraq can be further “ adjusted ” upon consultation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up his anti-war rhetoric in recent months with the presidential election inching closer , he has yet to deliver on his 2016 campaign promise to pull the plug on the “ endless wars.
” US President Donald Trump accused the Pentagon ’ s top brass of starting wars in order to hand billions to arms makers , drawing shocked reactions from his liberal critics and foreign policy hawks – some playing both roles at once .

US President Donald Trump is poised to announce the pullout of more American troops from Iraq on Wednesday, and from Afghanistan in the coming days, a US official reportedly told the media aboard Air Force One.
Senior administration official tells reporters on Air Force One to expect an announcement tomorrow on further US troop withdrawals from #Iraq and another announcement in the coming days about #Afghanistan. — Steve Herman (@W7VOA) September 9, 2020
The report comes amid Trump’s row with Pentagon top brass, who he accused of doing the bidding of the military-industrial complex. In a widely-publicized remark on Monday, Trump said that the top people in the Pentagon might not be “in love” with him “because they want to do nothing but fight wars.”
The expected drawdown is in line with Trump’s previous pledge to reduce the number of troops in both war-torn countries. Last month, US Defense Secretary Mark Esper revealed that the number of US troops stationed in Afghanistan would be slashed to less than 5,000 in the coming months.
Trump has said he wants to cap the US contingent on the ground in Afghanistan to no more than 4,000 troops.
“We’re going down to 4,000, we’re negotiating right now… I don’t want to tell you (when). But I’ve always said we will get largely out,” Trump said last month, noting that he expects between 4,000 and 5,000 troops to be in Afghanistan by Election Day.
The framework for the gradual pullout was set forth in a deal with Taliban, signed on February 29.
The US has also been scaling down its presence in Iraq, but, as with Afghanistan, it does not plan to leave the country completely. After Washington and Baghdad fell out over the US’ killing of top Iranian General Qassem Soleimani in January, Washington ignored calls to withdraw, insisting that its presence in the country was “appropriate.”
Last month, Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr., the head of the Pentagon’s Central Command, said the US expects to keep “a long-term presence” in Iraq, purportedly to fight the remnants of Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS) and to prevent Iran from gaining a foothold in the country. McKenzie said the contingent of 5,200 US troops now in Iraq can be further “adjusted” upon consultation with Baghdad.
While Trump has ramped up his anti-war rhetoric in recent months with the presidential election inching closer, he has yet to deliver on his 2016 campaign promise to pull the plug on the “endless wars.”
US President Donald Trump accused the Pentagon’s top brass of starting wars in order to hand billions to arms makers, drawing shocked reactions from his liberal critics and foreign policy hawks – some playing both roles at once.


newswars--2020-09-09--Spain: Citizens Stop Police From Arresting a Woman For Not Wearing a Mask

A video out of Spain shows citizens preventing police from arresting a woman for not wearing a face mask .
The clip shows officers attempting to pull the older woman away from the crowd , but they manage to wrestle her away from the cops .
“ In Spain , police tried to arrest a woman for not wearing a mask .
Dozens of people took off their masks and then helped the woman , ” states the description accompanying the video .
As we highlighted yesterday , Spanish authorities are using low-flying helicopters fitted with loudspeakers to enforce COVID-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ previously reported on the case of two women in Spain who were beaten by police for not properly wearing their masks .
A protest in Madrid against Spain ’ s coronavirus laws , which require people to wear face masks everywhere , both inside and outside , drew thousands of demonstrators on Saturday .
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch .
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here .
Also , I urgently need your financial support here .

A video out of Spain shows citizens preventing police from arresting a woman for not wearing a face mask.
The clip shows officers attempting to pull the older woman away from the crowd, but they manage to wrestle her away from the cops.
“In Spain, police tried to arrest a woman for not wearing a mask. Dozens of people took off their masks and then helped the woman,” states the description accompanying the video.

As we highlighted yesterday, Spanish authorities are using low-flying helicopters fitted with loudspeakers to enforce COVID-19 curfew rules on beaches.
We also previously reported on the case of two women in Spain who were beaten by police for not properly wearing their masks.
A protest in Madrid against Spain’s coronavirus laws, which require people to wear face masks everywhere, both inside and outside, drew thousands of demonstrators on Saturday.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Also, I urgently need your financial support here.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-09-10--Nexflix’s ‘Cuties’ is Even Worse Than the Trailer

The ‘ Cuties ’ movie that stirred controversy last month following the release of its trailer has now been released and it ’ s even worse – featuring numerous scenes that showcase the vile sexualization of children .
As we previously highlighted , the French production centers around four pre-teen children from a ‘ diverse ’ neighborhood attempting to win a dance competition .
The trailer shows the girls twerking and adopting other sexualized poses .
Even after a massive backlash , Netflix refused to pull the plug on the movie , acknowledging merely that the promo poster for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be changed .
After its release last night , Twitter user Ghost Jim watched the movie and posted several clips which illustrate how the film is basically soft porn for pedophiles .
“ Netflix just released the controversial ‘ Cuties ’ and it ’ s worse than you could imagine .
Make no mistake : Netflix is at the forefront of sexualizing children and normalizing pedophilia !
” he tweeted .
The first clip shows the girls aggressively shaking their backsides while putting their fingers in their mouth .
The next clips shows @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stage in front of judges in a similar manner while an audience watches , some of them applauding , some of them booing .
Note that the dance routine performed by the main characters is very similar to that seen in WAP ( Wet-Ass Pussy ) – a Cardi B song released last month which caused controversy for its overtly sexual dance choreography , something that has since been copied by underage girls across America .
The next scene shows the black girl in the movie vigorously shaking her entire body .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of all .
It shows the girls accusing a security guard of being a “ pervert ” and trying to molest them .
Another security guard then arrives and the black girl begins performing a dance in front of him as he ogles her and the camera lingers on her torso .
“ That ’ s as far as I ’ ll go with this demonic garbage .
No doubt the film has much more .
Netflix is streaming it right into peoples homes where young , impressionable girls can watch it .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to children can pleasure themselves to .
Thanks Netflix !
” remarks the Twitter user .
He then reveals the details of other revolting scenes in the film , including the girls experimenting with webcam porn and a girl taking a photo of her vagina and posting it online .
While Turkey ’ s media watchdog has ordered the film removed from Turkey ’ s Netflix portal , British newspaper the Independent described the movie as an “ important contribution to the coming-of-age genre.
” The New Yorker ’ s blasted a “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by right-wingers , while Rolling Stone called the movie “ a sensitive portrait of growing pains that deserves to be seen.
” Meanwhile , a petition to pressure Netflix into removing the movie has reached over 123,000 signatures .
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch .
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here .
Also , I urgently need your financial support here .

The ‘Cuties’ movie that stirred controversy last month following the release of its trailer has now been released and it’s even worse – featuring numerous scenes that showcase the vile sexualization of children.
As we previously highlighted, the French production centers around four pre-teen children from a ‘diverse’ neighborhood attempting to win a dance competition. The trailer shows the girls twerking and adopting other sexualized poses.
Even after a massive backlash, Netflix refused to pull the plug on the movie, acknowledging merely that the promo poster for the film was unsuitable and that it would be changed.
After its release last night, Twitter user Ghost Jim watched the movie and posted several clips which illustrate how the film is basically soft porn for pedophiles.
“Netflix just released the controversial ‘Cuties’ and it’s worse than you could imagine. Make no mistake: Netflix is at the forefront of sexualizing children and normalizing pedophilia!” he tweeted.
The first clip shows the girls aggressively shaking their backsides while putting their fingers in their mouth.
Netflix just released the controversial ‘Cuties’ and it’s worse than you could imagine. Make no mistake: Netflix is at the forefront of sexualizing children and normalizing pedophilia! pic.twitter.com/emiMzk8w1z — (@GhostJim4) September 9, 2020
The next clips shows the girls wearing skimpy outfits dancing on stage in front of judges in a similar manner while an audience watches, some of them applauding, some of them booing.
Someone needs to go to jail for this shit! pic.twitter.com/Ln0CnZSyok — (@GhostJim4) September 9, 2020
Note that the dance routine performed by the main characters is very similar to that seen in WAP (Wet-Ass Pussy) – a Cardi B song released last month which caused controversy for its overtly sexual dance choreography, something that has since been copied by underage girls across America.
The next scene shows the black girl in the movie vigorously shaking her entire body.
“I received numerous attacks on my character from people who had not seen the film, who thought I was actually making a film that was apologetic about hypersexualisation of children” – Cuties director Maïmouna Doucouré Really? pic.twitter.com/CGyXPdtR3G — (@GhostJim4) September 9, 2020
The next scene is perhaps the most revolting of all. It shows the girls accusing a security guard of being a “pervert” and trying to molest them.
Another security guard then arrives and the black girl begins performing a dance in front of him as he ogles her and the camera lingers on her torso.
In case you believe everyone is just naive and didn’t think this had anything to do with pedophilia: pic.twitter.com/z9IBpup2JV — (@GhostJim4) September 9, 2020
“That’s as far as I’ll go with this demonic garbage. No doubt the film has much more. Netflix is streaming it right into peoples homes where young, impressionable girls can watch it. And where grown men with sexual attraction to children can pleasure themselves to. Thanks Netflix!” remarks the Twitter user.
He then reveals the details of other revolting scenes in the film, including the girls experimenting with webcam porn and a girl taking a photo of her vagina and posting it online.
No more clips but here is what else happens: – an 11 year old girl takes a photo of her vagina and posts it online
– the 5 young girls take a turn at webcam porn
– a young girl tries to take a photo of a schoolboys penis
– an 11 year old girl finds a used condom and blows it up — (@GhostJim4) September 9, 2020
While Turkey’s media watchdog has ordered the film removed from Turkey’s Netflix portal, British newspaper the Independent described the movie as an “important contribution to the coming-of-age genre.”
The New Yorker’s blasted a “scurrilous campaign against the film” waged by right-wingers, while Rolling Stone called the movie “a sensitive portrait of growing pains that deserves to be seen.”
Meanwhile, a petition to pressure Netflix into removing the movie has reached over 123,000 signatures.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Also, I urgently need your financial support here.
———————————————————————————————————————