newswars--2020-10-01--The NRA Would Be Wise to Leave New York ASAP

The State of New York has wasted no time reminding Americans about its pathological disregard for personal freedom .
Its covid-19 lockdown policies were among the most heavy-handed responses implemented by a state government in the country .
Controversies surrounding the state government ’ s decision to place recovering covid patients in retirement homes , arguably a major factor behind the state ’ s deadly retirement home outbreak , were major black eyes for Governor Andrew Cuomo ’ s administration .
The Empire State ’ s overreach hasn ’ t been confined to covid-19 , though .
New York policymakers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by attempting to dissolve the National Rifle Association .
Led by New York State attorney general Letitia James , the State of New York moved forward with a lawsuit last month in an attempt to gut the organization during a time when the NRA is mired in financial scandals .
The New York suit alleges that the NRA has been involved in extensive cases of misallocation of funds and corruption , therefore requiring the state to dissolve America ’ s oldest and most powerful gun lobby .
While state governments have the power @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the case the State of New York is pursuing against the NRA reeks of political grandstanding .
The NRA is an easy target for the Left , which is ecstatic about any opportunity to demonize gun owners and institutions that encourage lawful use of firearms .
In the case of New York attorney general James , her record of antigun crusading speaks for itself .
While in her previous position as a public advocate for New York City , James attempted to force banks to break their ties with firearms manufacturers after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ James is a politician with an ax to grind , and the current covid-19 lockdown hysteria gives her an opportunity to poke a “ deplorable ” group in the eye .
The NRA is no steadfast paladin of gun freedom , at least when compared to hardline rivals or the many grassroots organizations that don ’ t rely on big donor money to stay afloat .
Be that as it may , its recent confrontation with New York ’ s state government should concern any organization advocating for even stronger firearm-related freedoms .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ politicized nature of political speech and activities non-profit organizations participate in .
Historically , politicians have used the levers of tax power to harass political organizations that rub them the wrong way .
It wasn ’ t too long ago the Obama administration ’ s IRS made went after Tea Party organizations and excessively scrutinized their internal operations .
While the IRS issued an apology for its behavior during the Obama years , the threat of government sticking its nose into the affairs of political organizations is still present at all levels .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ be more than happy to make peoples ’ lives miserable .
Gun owners face threats from all corners—state and nonstate actors .
To mitigate these threats , it would be wise for Second Amendment organizations to go where free speech and political organization is treated best .
As riots across have vividly demonstrated , we can not assume all jurisdictions will uphold their side of the proverbial “ social contract ” and protect basic liberties .
Mises Institute president Jeff Deist candidly observed , “ Selective prosecution and selective non-prosecution are terrifying features @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Any of us could have our lives ruined tomorrow by a political DA.
” Politicians are picking up on the divergent political paths states are taking .
South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem made a name for herself by refusing to enact a statewide lockdown .
Similarly , Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge came to the NRA ’ s defense by penning a piece for NBC News condemning her New York counterpart and demonstrating how her state offers more favorable conditions for gun owners and advocacy for the concept .
After all , Arkansas @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not going to go out of its way to persecute political organizations for wrongthink by using the excuse of campaign finance violations or trumped up charges of misuse of funds .
The NRA ’ s current dilemma is emblematic of our political era – mass polarization and a widening gulf between the values of states dominated by major urban centers and those with more rural constituencies .
Let ’ s face it , New York hasn ’ t been a gun-friendly jurisdiction in recent decades .
From New York City ’ s Assault @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the passage of the SAFE Act in 2013 , which established universal background checks and broadened the definition of so-called “ assault weapons , ” the State of New York has demonstrated a clear antipathy towards gun ownership .
It is no surprise why it ’ s ranked dead last according to Guns & Ammo magazine ’ s annual rankings for gun-friendly states .
America ’ s federalism still provides a fallback option for Americans living in states that are hostile to economic and cultural interests .
If states become overzealous in their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ feet by moving to states that are friendlier to personal and economic freedoms .
We are already witnessing this trend in action as 6 million Americans have already left states like California in the past decade for more business-friendly and affordable places such as Arizona , Colorado , and Texas .
So , the movement of people is not just a hypothetical scenario in today ’ s climate of polarization .
President Donald Trump sagaciously suggested the NRA move its headquarters to Texas , a state known for its gun culture and policies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
From 2020 and beyond , many gun owners will have to grapple with the grim reality that certain jurisdictions will not be amicable towards wedge issues that span the spectrum from abortion to gun ownership .
A number of gun owners have already gotten the memo and have begun to explore unorthodox ways of getting around the existential threat of gun control in their respective localities .
Some have launched the notorious Second Amendment sanctuary resolutions movement .
Although there are legitimate critiques about the efficacy of said sanctuary movements , gun @ @ @ @ @ @ @ right mindset of using local action to effect change , as opposed to waiting for the Executive Branch or the Supreme Court to save them .
Moreover , some have rocked the boat even further by suggesting state lines be redrawn .
For example , West Virginia invited rural countries of Virginia to join the state , while disgruntled residents of Oregon and Northern California are attempting to break away from their respective states to form a part of a Greater Idaho project that better represents their values .
More states should make @ @ @ @ @ @ @ progressive bastions .
Americans can see for themselves that there are other jurisdictions in the country which treat certain freedoms better than others .
The potential loss of a significant portion of their tax base could be enough for blue states to start to reconsider their divisive policies .
The question is , are they ready to see the error of their ways ?
We will have to see .
Roger Stone warns President Trump the debates are rigged and tells him how to overcome the Dems ’ attempted coup .

The State of New York has wasted no time reminding Americans about its pathological disregard for personal freedom.
Its covid-19 lockdown policies were among the most heavy-handed responses implemented by a state government in the country. Controversies surrounding the state government’s decision to place recovering covid patients in retirement homes, arguably a major factor behind the state’s deadly retirement home outbreak, were major black eyes for Governor Andrew Cuomo’s administration. The Empire State’s overreach hasn’t been confined to covid-19, though.
New York policymakers are taking crisis opportunism to another level by attempting to dissolve the National Rifle Association. Led by New York State attorney general Letitia James, the State of New York moved forward with a lawsuit last month in an attempt to gut the organization during a time when the NRA is mired in financial scandals. The New York suit alleges that the NRA has been involved in extensive cases of misallocation of funds and corruption, therefore requiring the state to dissolve America’s oldest and most powerful gun lobby.
How Bureaucrats Target Their Ideological Enemies
While state governments have the power to investigate organizations for potentially defrauding donors, the case the State of New York is pursuing against the NRA reeks of political grandstanding. The NRA is an easy target for the Left, which is ecstatic about any opportunity to demonize gun owners and institutions that encourage lawful use of firearms. In the case of New York attorney general James, her record of antigun crusading speaks for itself. While in her previous position as a public advocate for New York City, James attempted to force banks to break their ties with firearms manufacturers after the Pulse nightclub shooting in 2016. James is a politician with an ax to grind, and the current covid-19 lockdown hysteria gives her an opportunity to poke a “deplorable” group in the eye.
The NRA is no steadfast paladin of gun freedom, at least when compared to hardline rivals or the many grassroots organizations that don’t rely on big donor money to stay afloat. Be that as it may, its recent confrontation with New York’s state government should concern any organization advocating for even stronger firearm-related freedoms.
Previously, I wrote about the increasingly politicized nature of political speech and activities non-profit organizations participate in. Historically, politicians have used the levers of tax power to harass political organizations that rub them the wrong way. It wasn’t too long ago the Obama administration’s IRS made went after Tea Party organizations and excessively scrutinized their internal operations. While the IRS issued an apology for its behavior during the Obama years, the threat of government sticking its nose into the affairs of political organizations is still present at all levels. For now, activist state governments will be more than happy to make peoples’ lives miserable.
Gun owners face threats from all corners—state and nonstate actors. To mitigate these threats, it would be wise for Second Amendment organizations to go where free speech and political organization is treated best. As riots across have vividly demonstrated, we cannot assume all jurisdictions will uphold their side of the proverbial “social contract” and protect basic liberties. Mises Institute president Jeff Deist candidly observed , “Selective prosecution and selective non-prosecution are terrifying features of the crappy US justice system. Any of us could have our lives ruined tomorrow by a political DA.”
Politicians are picking up on the divergent political paths states are taking. South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem made a name for herself by refusing to enact a statewide lockdown . Similarly, Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge came to the NRA’s defense by penning a piece for NBC News condemning her New York counterpart and demonstrating how her state offers more favorable conditions for gun owners and advocacy for the concept. After all, Arkansas is a constitutional carry state and is not going to go out of its way to persecute political organizations for wrongthink by using the excuse of campaign finance violations or trumped up charges of misuse of funds.
The NRA’s current dilemma is emblematic of our political era – mass polarization and a widening gulf between the values of states dominated by major urban centers and those with more rural constituencies. Let’s face it, New York hasn’t been a gun-friendly jurisdiction in recent decades. From New York City’s Assault Weapons Ban during the early 1990s to the passage of the SAFE Act in 2013 , which established universal background checks and broadened the definition of so-called “assault weapons,” the State of New York has demonstrated a clear antipathy towards gun ownership. It is no surprise why it’s ranked dead last according to Guns & Ammo magazine’s annual rankings for gun-friendly states.
The Benefits of Decentralization
America’s federalism still provides a fallback option for Americans living in states that are hostile to economic and cultural interests. If states become overzealous in their policymaking, people can vote with their feet by moving to states that are friendlier to personal and economic freedoms. We are already witnessing this trend in action as 6 million Americans have already left states like California in the past decade for more business-friendly and affordable places such as Arizona, Colorado, and Texas. So, the movement of people is not just a hypothetical scenario in today’s climate of polarization.
President Donald Trump sagaciously suggested the NRA move its headquarters to Texas, a state known for its gun culture and policies that are receptive towards lawful gun ownership. From 2020 and beyond, many gun owners will have to grapple with the grim reality that certain jurisdictions will not be amicable towards wedge issues that span the spectrum from abortion to gun ownership. A number of gun owners have already gotten the memo and have begun to explore unorthodox ways of getting around the existential threat of gun control in their respective localities. Some have launched the notorious Second Amendment sanctuary resolutions movement. Although there are legitimate critiques about the efficacy of said sanctuary movements, gun owners are at least getting into the right mindset of using local action to effect change, as opposed to waiting for the Executive Branch or the Supreme Court to save them. Moreover, some have rocked the boat even further by suggesting state lines be redrawn. For example, West Virginia invited rural countries of Virginia to join the state, while disgruntled residents of Oregon and Northern California are attempting to break away from their respective states to form a part of a Greater Idaho project that better represents their values.
More states should make it a point in differentiating themselves from progressive bastions. Americans can see for themselves that there are other jurisdictions in the country which treat certain freedoms better than others. The potential loss of a significant portion of their tax base could be enough for blue states to start to reconsider their divisive policies. The question is, are they ready to see the error of their ways?
We will have to see.
Roger Stone warns President Trump the debates are rigged and tells him how to overcome the Dems’ attempted coup.


newswars--2020-10-01--Trump Admin Slashes Refugee Admissions to Record Low

President Donald Trump ’ s administration said late Wednesday the United States will take in no more than 15,000 refugees over the coming year .
That represents a record low figure and comes despite surging global displacement .
Nearly 80 million people around the world are displaced , double the number a decade ago , according to the UN Refugee Agency .
The US State Department said the reduced figure was an example of the prioritizing of the “ safety and well-being of Americans , especially in light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
” The declaration occurred less than an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fiscal year , narrowly meeting a deadline enshrined in US law .
The 1980 Refugee Act means presidents must issue their demands by October 1 .
The president must also consult Congress prior to making his determination , though ultimately the decision lies with him .
The 40-year-old resettlement program has been gradually decreasing in numbers since Trump came to power and the 2021 figure will maintain that trend .
Next year will see a 16 % reduction in comparison with refugee admissions for 2020 .
Trump froze admissions in March as the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ US , citing a need to protect American jobs as the repercussions of the pandemic brought the economy to its knees .
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said the White House is committed to providing a safe haven for refugees .
“ We continue to be the single greatest contributor to the relief of humanitarian crisis all around the world , and we will continue to do so , ” Pompeo told reporters in Rome on the sidelines of a conference on religious freedom organized by the US Embassy .
“ Certainly so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , I can promise you this administration is deeply committed to that.
” Trump ’ s main rival in November ’ s presidential election , Joe Biden , has pledged to raise the number of admissions to 125,000 .
Owen Shroyer explains how beauty if a factor in winning the hearts and minds of people in the fight for the future .

President Donald Trump’s administration said late Wednesday the United States will take in no more than 15,000 refugees over the coming year.
That represents a record low figure and comes despite surging global displacement. Nearly 80 million people around the world are displaced, double the number a decade ago, according to the UN Refugee Agency.
How do refugee admissions work?
The US State Department said the reduced figure was an example of the prioritizing of the “safety and well-being of Americans, especially in light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.”
The declaration occurred less than an hour before the start of the 2021 fiscal year, narrowly meeting a deadline enshrined in US law.
The 1980 Refugee Act means presidents must issue their demands by October 1. The president must also consult Congress prior to making his determination, though ultimately the decision lies with him.
The 40-year-old resettlement program has been gradually decreasing in numbers since Trump came to power and the 2021 figure will maintain that trend. Next year will see a 16% reduction in comparison with refugee admissions for 2020.
Campaign issue
Trump froze admissions in March as the coronavirus began to take hold in the US, citing a need to protect American jobs as the repercussions of the pandemic brought the economy to its knees.
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said the White House is committed to providing a safe haven for refugees.
“We continue to be the single greatest contributor to the relief of humanitarian crisis all around the world, and we will continue to do so,” Pompeo told reporters in Rome on the sidelines of a conference on religious freedom organized by the US Embassy.
“Certainly so long as President Trump is in office, I can promise you this administration is deeply committed to that.”
Trump’s main rival in November’s presidential election, Joe Biden, has pledged to raise the number of admissions to 125,000.
Owen Shroyer explains how beauty if a factor in winning the hearts and minds of people in the fight for the future.


newswars--2020-10-01--CNN Says We’re Never “Getting Back to Normal”

CNN has published an article asserting that people need to accept that things are never “ getting back to normal ” and that mandatory coronavirus restrictions such as wearing face masks will become “ permanent ” .
In a piece titled ‘ There is no getting ‘ back to normal , ’ experts say .
The sooner we accept that , the better ’ – CNN international security editor Nick Paton Walsh writes , “ Things are most likely never going “ back to normal.
” Walsh says that the pre-corona world is now mere nostalgia and that the public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it.
” Along with other social distancing measures , Walsh says that the mandatory wearing of masks will become “ permanent ” and “ just part of life.
” In other words , “ now we have the power , we ’ re not giving it back.
” Citing comments by Thomas Davenport , professor of information technology and management at Babson College in Wellesley , Massachusetts , Walsh says that , “ Those who refuse to wear masks may be guilty of normalcy bias , since they perceive this intrusion into lives @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t need to embrace.
” CNN also previously published an article which argued that wearing face masks is going to become as taboo as drink driving , despite innumerable experts across the world having warned that face masks are largely pointless from the perspective of preventing the spread of coronavirus .
Of course , this was all so predictable from the very start .
Dystopian authors throughout history warned that face masks were a way to further atomize and force conformity on a population whose identity and individuality is increasingly being erased .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the multitude of restrictions on our liberties and right to travel were just a necessary “ temporary ” measure in order to get back to normal .
Now we ’ re being told that this is the “ new normal.
” Now we ’ re being told that coronavirus hysteria will never end .
Mandated face masks , a cashless society , mandatory vaccines to travel and a Chinese-style social credit score system linked to corona apps .
Unless larger numbers of people start to resist this “ new normal , ” we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that is never coming off .
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch .
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here .
Also , I urgently need your financial support here .

CNN has published an article asserting that people need to accept that things are never “getting back to normal” and that mandatory coronavirus restrictions such as wearing face masks will become “permanent”.
In a piece titled ‘There is no getting ‘back to normal,’ experts say. The sooner we accept that, the better’ – CNN international security editor Nick Paton Walsh writes, “Things are most likely never going “back to normal.”
Walsh says that the pre-corona world is now mere nostalgia and that the public needs to “come to terms with it.”
Along with other social distancing measures, Walsh says that the mandatory wearing of masks will become “permanent” and “just part of life.”
In other words, “now we have the power, we’re not giving it back.”
Citing comments by Thomas Davenport, professor of information technology and management at Babson College in Wellesley, Massachusetts, Walsh says that, “Those who refuse to wear masks may be guilty of normalcy bias, since they perceive this intrusion into lives as a passing fad they don’t need to embrace.”
CNN also previously published an article which argued that wearing face masks is going to become as taboo as drink driving, despite innumerable experts across the world having warned that face masks are largely pointless from the perspective of preventing the spread of coronavirus.
Of course, this was all so predictable from the very start.
Dystopian authors throughout history warned that face masks were a way to further atomize and force conformity on a population whose identity and individuality is increasingly being erased.
At first, we were told that the multitude of restrictions on our liberties and right to travel were just a necessary “temporary” measure in order to get back to normal.
Now we’re being told that this is the “new normal.” Now we’re being told that coronavirus hysteria will never end.
Mandated face masks, a cashless society, mandatory vaccines to travel and a Chinese-style social credit score system linked to corona apps.
Unless larger numbers of people start to resist this “new normal,” we’ve been put in a straightjacket that is never coming off.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Also, I urgently need your financial support here.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-10-01--Dems, GOP Agree to Include Check Payments in Next COVID Relief Bill – Mnuchin

Republican and Democratic lawmakers have negotiated the inclusion of another batch of direct payments to Americans into a potential coronavirus relief package , Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin told Fox News Business on Wednesday .
According to Mnuchin , these payments will be similar to those distributed under the CARES Act , which has approved roughly $ 3 trillion to disburse as loans and grants to businesses , paycheck protection for workers and personal aid to qualifying US citizens and residents .
The two parties have been locked in a stalemate for three months over the next COVID-19 relief package , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the coronavirus pandemic on American citizens .
Earlier in the day , Mnuchin said that he and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi had been “ very effective in communicating ” and would speak again later , but he expects no significant results until Thursday .
“ I think we ’ ll have a very reasonable response , something that ’ s very similar to what has been the bipartisan proposal the problem solvers have worked on , and I hope we can get something done , ” he said .
He noted that there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the coronavirus-induced measures that are in need of protection to open up the economy .
Both Republicans and Democrats have blamed each other for the impasse over the fifth instalment of the stimulus , which has become a political issue ahead of the 3 November election .
Alex Jones drones over Zilker park to warn people about the truth of the Covid lockdowns .

Republican and Democratic lawmakers have negotiated the inclusion of another batch of direct payments to Americans into a potential coronavirus relief package, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin told Fox News Business on Wednesday.
According to Mnuchin, these payments will be similar to those distributed under the CARES Act, which has approved roughly $3 trillion to disburse as loans and grants to businesses, paycheck protection for workers and personal aid to qualifying US citizens and residents.
The two parties have been locked in a stalemate for three months over the next COVID-19 relief package, aimed at mitigating the negative effects of the coronavirus pandemic on American citizens.
Earlier in the day, Mnuchin said that he and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi had been “very effective in communicating” and would speak again later, but he expects no significant results until Thursday.
“I think we’ll have a very reasonable response, something that’s very similar to what has been the bipartisan proposal the problem solvers have worked on, and I hope we can get something done,” he said.
He noted that there are still many small businesses impacted by the coronavirus-induced measures that are in need of protection to open up the economy.
Both Republicans and Democrats have blamed each other for the impasse over the fifth instalment of the stimulus, which has become a political issue ahead of the 3 November election.
Alex Jones drones over Zilker park to warn people about the truth of the Covid lockdowns.


newswars--2020-10-01--NY Times Admits WHO’s Decision Not to Close Borders at Start of Pandemic Was Based on “Politics,” No

NY Times Admits WHO’s Decision Not to Close Borders at Start of Pandemic Was Based on “Politics,” Not Science

The New York Times has published an article admitting what we told you 8 months ago – that the World Health Organization ’ s directive at the start of the coronavirus pandemic that countries shouldn ’ t close their borders was a decision based on “ politics , ” not science .
“ The World Health Organization has long encouraged mass tourism and said closing borders wouldn ’ t stop the spread of Covid-19 .
A New York Times investigation found this policy was never based on science , but instead on politics and economics , ” tweeted the NY @ @ @ @ @ @ @ detailing the issue .
As we reported back on January 31 , the WHO repeatedly urged countries not to impose border controls , in part to avoid the “ stigmatization ” of Chinese people .
In other words , not being seen to be racist and preventing people ’ s feelings from being hurt was more important than stopping the spread of the pandemic .
Then in April , we documented how the WHO blocked doctors from urging countries to impose border controls to stop the spread of coronavirus .
“ So the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ divergence of views but they won ’ t actually go into detail about who was trying to block it .
But there were doctors there who wanted to issue travel bans and the World Health Organization blocked it , ” reported Sky News Australia .
The next month , scientists in Brazil also confirmed that the countries most affected by the coronavirus spread were the ones who continued to allow unrestricted travel across their borders .
A Mount Sinai study found that New York City ’ s record-high coronavirus cases and deaths were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Europe , meaning that many more lives could have been saved if borders had been closed down earlier .
Countries such as Russia that were pro-active in closing down their borders early recorded significantly fewer COVID-19 cases and deaths than other countries of a similar population size .
Despite its 144 million population , Russia recorded under 21,000 coronavirus deaths , compared to the UK , which has a population of 65 million yet recorded more than double that number of COVID deaths .
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here .
Also , I urgently need your financial support here .

The New York Times has published an article admitting what we told you 8 months ago – that the World Health Organization’s directive at the start of the coronavirus pandemic that countries shouldn’t close their borders was a decision based on “politics,” not science.
“The World Health Organization has long encouraged mass tourism and said closing borders wouldn’t stop the spread of Covid-19. A New York Times investigation found this policy was never based on science, but instead on politics and economics,” tweeted the NY Times with a link to an article detailing the issue.
The World Health Organization has long encouraged mass tourism and said closing borders wouldn’t stop the spread of Covid-19. A New York Times investigation found this policy was never based on science, but instead on politics and economics. https://t.co/bQcZ9Mquu1 — The New York Times (@nytimes) September 30, 2020
As we reported back on January 31, the WHO repeatedly urged countries not to impose border controls, in part to avoid the “stigmatization” of Chinese people.
In other words, not being seen to be racist and preventing people’s feelings from being hurt was more important than stopping the spread of the pandemic.
Then in April, we documented how the WHO blocked doctors from urging countries to impose border controls to stop the spread of coronavirus.
“So the official meeting records say there was a divergence of views but they won’t actually go into detail about who was trying to block it. But there were doctors there who wanted to issue travel bans and the World Health Organization blocked it,” reported Sky News Australia.
The next month, scientists in Brazil also confirmed that the countries most affected by the coronavirus spread were the ones who continued to allow unrestricted travel across their borders.
A Mount Sinai study found that New York City’s record-high coronavirus cases and deaths were “predominately” due to travel from Europe, meaning that many more lives could have been saved if borders had been closed down earlier.
Countries such as Russia that were pro-active in closing down their borders early recorded significantly fewer COVID-19 cases and deaths than other countries of a similar population size.
Despite its 144 million population, Russia recorded under 21,000 coronavirus deaths, compared to the UK, which has a population of 65 million yet recorded more than double that number of COVID deaths.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Also, I urgently need your financial support here.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-10-01--China Uses Presidential Debate To Attack America, Promote Global Authoritarianism

Chinese state media once again attacked diversity of opinion in the US to promote the Communist state ’ s brand of global authoritarianism , this time reviewing the Presidential debate between Trump and Biden , and noting that Americans must be “ disappointed.
” Suddenly appearing to become television critics , China ’ s Global Times on Wednesday described the debate as “ full of personal attacks and disruptions which jeopardized the audience ’ s viewing experience ” .
The State run outlet described the debate as “ epitome of U.S. chaos , ” and a “ representation of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ piece also covered “ racial issues ” , suggesting that they “ are triggered by the fundamental divergences over US values and where the US heads within its society.
” “ Such divergences are implacable .
What is worse , the US leadership is intensifying the divergences , making conflicts between different races more difficult to resolve , ” the article proclaimed .
Given the communist Chinese government ’ s fondness of internment camps for Uyghur Muslims , using them as forced slave labor based on their ethnicity , which was even mentioned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in a position to lecture America about “ racial issues ” .
Gerald Celente guest hosts The Alex Jones Show to break down how the ChiComs are infiltrating and subverting the American people .
Another state publication , The People ’ s Daily , got in on the act , lamenting on how bad it feels for Americans because their politicians won ’ t make nice with communist China .
“ The US can neither achieve lasting unity by “ making ” foreign enemies at the expense of America ’ s own interests @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time by playing a dangerous game of misleading the world about its relationship with China , as truth will come to light sooner or later , ” the article proclaimed .
“ It should be noted that the extreme words and deeds of the US for grabbing attention and gaining private profits will harm the country ’ s future , ” the piece also threatened .
It also claimed that America ’ s “ political shows to deflect attention and shift the blame to other countries are not conducive to solving the increasingly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” adding that “ Instead , such practices have caused damage to international relations that should not be overlooked.
” The piece concluded that “ short-sighted political calculations are doomed to do more harm that good to the U.S. , ” further claiming that “ America has no choice but to come to some kind of way to live peacefully with China.
” Commentator Gordon G. Chang noted that diversity of opinion and heated debate is actually the cornerstone of a free country , something that the Chinese government knows all too well @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Others joined in analysing the ridiculous claim that America ’ s political system is inferior to China ’ s :

Chinese state media once again attacked diversity of opinion in the US to promote the Communist state’s brand of global authoritarianism, this time reviewing the Presidential debate between Trump and Biden, and noting that Americans must be “disappointed.”
Suddenly appearing to become television critics, China’s Global Times on Wednesday described the debate as “full of personal attacks and disruptions which jeopardized the audience’s viewing experience”.
The State run outlet described the debate as “epitome of U.S. chaos,” and a “representation of the sharp division within U.S. society.”
The piece also covered “racial issues”, suggesting that they “are triggered by the fundamental divergences over US values and where the US heads within its society.”
“Such divergences are implacable. What is worse, the US leadership is intensifying the divergences, making conflicts between different races more difficult to resolve,” the article proclaimed.
Given the communist Chinese government’s fondness of internment camps for Uyghur Muslims, using them as forced slave labor based on their ethnicity, which was even mentioned in the article, it is hardly in a position to lecture America about “racial issues”.
Gerald Celente guest hosts The Alex Jones Show to break down how the ChiComs are infiltrating and subverting the American people.
Another state publication, The People’s Daily, got in on the act, lamenting on how bad it feels for Americans because their politicians won’t make nice with communist China.
“The US can neither achieve lasting unity by “making” foreign enemies at the expense of America’s own interests nor deceive the public for a long time by playing a dangerous game of misleading the world about its relationship with China, as truth will come to light sooner or later,” the article proclaimed.
“It should be noted that the extreme words and deeds of the US for grabbing attention and gaining private profits will harm the country’s future,” the piece also threatened.
It also claimed that America’s “political shows to deflect attention and shift the blame to other countries are not conducive to solving the increasingly serious systemic crises inside the US,” adding that “Instead, such practices have caused damage to international relations that should not be overlooked.”
The piece concluded that “short-sighted political calculations are doomed to do more harm that good to the U.S.,” further claiming that “America has no choice but to come to some kind of way to live peacefully with China.”
Commentator Gordon G. Chang noted that diversity of opinion and heated debate is actually the cornerstone of a free country, something that the Chinese government knows all too well, and therefore has almost completely eradicated:
Yes, @HuXijin_GT, in #America there is “division.” In #China, no one is allowed to disagree with #XiJinping. Those who do are never heard from again. #CCP https://t.co/XSW8Dc1ldC — Gordon G. Chang (@GordonGChang) September 30, 2020
Others joined in analysing the ridiculous claim that America’s political system is inferior to China’s:
“…the accelerating loss of advantages of the US political system” This is a strange way to make the even more absurd claim that the CCP’s system is advantageous. — Player Killers’ Exchange (@PlayerKillers__) September 30, 2020
Xitler has turned those who dared to debate him into organ donors. — BenTallmadge (@BenKTallmadge) September 30, 2020
What a shameless hypocrite! His country doesn’t have debates, elections or voting. But wants to talk about the flaws of SOME OTHER COUNTRY’S DEMOCRACY. Let’s see if he can call Xi the Pooh a ‘Clown’ or ‘Shut up, man’. He will sent for sentry duty to the Galwan border. — Siamsid99 (@siamsid99) September 30, 2020
In the least you don’t even have a debate crowning your emperor so what qualifications do you have commenting on others’ business? — Richard Steandric (@Rsteandric) October 1, 2020


newswars--2020-10-01--Flashback: Chris Wallace Mocked Trump in 1988 Interview

For those wondering whether Chris Wallace ’ s disastrous moderator performance during Tuesday night ’ s debate had anything to do with his personal beef with President Trump , a 1988 interview provides some context .
As we previously highlighted , Wallace constantly interrupted the president while interjecting while Biden was speaking 5 times less frequently .
His failure to control both candidates led to the Commission on Presidential Debates announcing that it was considering changing the format of the remaining debates , while calls for podcaster Joe Rogan to host the next debate intensified .
Now a resurfaced 1988 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ some people question whether Wallace has had a problem with Trump for decades .
During the interview , which took place during that year ’ s RNC , Wallace is antagonistic and belligerent , parroting accusations that Trump is a “ conspicuous example ” of “ greed and consumption , ” suggesting he should be apologetic over his “ hundred room mansion in Palm Beach , or the thirty million dollar yacht.
” Trump responded by pointing out he had employed 30,000 people who wouldn ’ t otherwise have jobs , remarking , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ excuses , I ’ m very proud of what we ’ ve been able to do.
” Wallace then asked Trump if he could handle satirical cartoons which attacked him for his wealth , prompting the then real estate mogul to defend himself again .
As the interview concluded , Trump curtly told Wallace , “ You have a good time , ” clearly nonplussed by his line of questioning .
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch .
I need you to sign @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Also , I urgently need your financial support here .

For those wondering whether Chris Wallace’s disastrous moderator performance during Tuesday night’s debate had anything to do with his personal beef with President Trump, a 1988 interview provides some context.
As we previously highlighted, Wallace constantly interrupted the president while interjecting while Biden was speaking 5 times less frequently.
His failure to control both candidates led to the Commission on Presidential Debates announcing that it was considering changing the format of the remaining debates, while calls for podcaster Joe Rogan to host the next debate intensified.
Now a resurfaced 1988 interview Wallace conducted with Trump is making some people question whether Wallace has had a problem with Trump for decades.
Chris Wallace has always been a jokepic.twitter.com/dT1ouUrWnl — Woj Pawelczyk (@Woj_Pawelczyk) September 30, 2020
During the interview, which took place during that year’s RNC, Wallace is antagonistic and belligerent, parroting accusations that Trump is a “conspicuous example” of “greed and consumption,” suggesting he should be apologetic over his “hundred room mansion in Palm Beach, or the thirty million dollar yacht.”
Trump responded by pointing out he had employed 30,000 people who wouldn’t otherwise have jobs, remarking, “I can’t make any excuses, I’m very proud of what we’ve been able to do.”
Wallace then asked Trump if he could handle satirical cartoons which attacked him for his wealth, prompting the then real estate mogul to defend himself again.
As the interview concluded, Trump curtly told Wallace, “You have a good time,” clearly nonplussed by his line of questioning.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Also, I urgently need your financial support here.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-10-01--Trump To Biden On Antifa: “Ideas Don’t Burn Down Buildings”

During a Campaign rally in Duluth , Minnesota Wednesday , President Trump mocked Joe Biden ’ s declaration during the Presidential debate that Antifa is ‘ just an idea ’ .
“ Joe Biden says Antifa is just an idea , ” Trump announced , adding “ Well , ideas don ’ t assault cops and they don ’ t burn down buildings .
Antifa is a domestic terrorist organization.
” Trump picked up where he left off in the debate , noting that he has received endorsements from law enforcement organizations nationwide , while Biden has not received a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ Sleepy Joe , name one law enforcement group that supports you.
’ Then Chris Wallace said , ‘ Don ’ t do that !
That ’ s not… ’ ” Trump said , adding “ Can you believe this guy ?
I was debating two people last night.
” “ If you ever became president , you have to deal with some of the toughest people in the world and Chris Wallace is very , very easy by comparison , ” Trump added .
After telling a heckler to “ go home @ @ @ @ @ @ @ slammed the corporate media for refusing to report on rioting and looting by leftists .
“ They think rioting is just ok , just do whatever you want , ” Trump said .
“ You can do whatever you want , you don ’ t have to wear masks , you just riot , 25,000 people standing on each other ’ s face , ” he added .
“ the liberal media is upset that I took the fight to Biden and exposed his very dangerous agenda , ” the President added .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sleepy Joe is totally off-limits , ” Trump boomed .
Seg Joe and Jill Biden ’ s Flacid Lawn “ Rallies , ” No One Shows Up Elsewhere during the rally , Trump warned that Biden wants to give free health care to illegal immigrants , destroying Medicare : Trump also talked about launching his 1776 Commission to counter Anti-American rhetoric in colleges : The President also vowed to return America to the manufacturing superpower of the world : Trump also spoke about reopening the Iron range mining districts after Biden and Obama @ @ @ @

During a Campaign rally in Duluth, Minnesota Wednesday, President Trump mocked Joe Biden’s declaration during the Presidential debate that Antifa is ‘just an idea’.
“Joe Biden says Antifa is just an idea,” Trump announced, adding “Well, ideas don’t assault cops and they don’t burn down buildings. Antifa is a domestic terrorist organization.”
Trump picked up where he left off in the debate, noting that he has received endorsements from law enforcement organizations nationwide, while Biden has not received a single one.
“I said, ‘Sleepy Joe, name one law enforcement group that supports you.’ Then Chris Wallace said, ‘Don’t do that! That’s not…’” Trump said, adding “Can you believe this guy? I was debating two people last night.”
“If you ever became president, you have to deal with some of the toughest people in the world and Chris Wallace is very, very easy by comparison,” Trump added.
After telling a heckler to “go home to mom,” the President also slammed the corporate media for refusing to report on rioting and looting by leftists.
“They think rioting is just ok, just do whatever you want,” Trump said.
“You can do whatever you want, you don’t have to wear masks, you just riot, 25,000 people standing on each other’s face,” he added.
“the liberal media is upset that I took the fight to Biden and exposed his very dangerous agenda,” the President added.
“Arson is ok, but challenging Sleepy Joe is totally off-limits,” Trump boomed.
Seg Joe and Jill Biden’s Flacid Lawn “Rallies,” No One Shows Up
Elsewhere during the rally, Trump warned that Biden wants to give free health care to illegal immigrants, destroying Medicare:
President @realDonaldTrump: Joe Biden would give free government health care to all illegal aliens, bankrupting Medicare pic.twitter.com/GzvlliwUvN — Team Trump (Text VOTE to 88022) (@TeamTrump) October 1, 2020
Trump also talked about launching his 1776 Commission to counter Anti-American rhetoric in colleges:
The President also vowed to return America to the manufacturing superpower of the world:
Trump also spoke about reopening the Iron range mining districts after Biden and Obama shut them down:
Watch the full speech here:


newswars--2020-10-01--WATCH: Portland BLM ‘security’ tackles man to the ground, puts him in chokehold

As protesters gathered in Portland at a vigil for a black man killed by police two years ago , BLM security at the event were filmed tackling a man and placing him in a chokehold , which police are forbidden from using .
Hundreds of Black Lives Matter protesters attended the event held at Southwest Fourth Avenue and Harvey Milk Street , the scene of the fatal police shooting of 27-year-old Patrick Kimmons in 2018 .
At one point , a young white man was seen moving quickly through the crowd before being unceremoniously steamrolled to the ground by ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ placed in a chokehold .
Commenters online pointed out the obvious hypocrisy of a protest movement calling to defund the police for brutality during arrests using chokeholds that were prohibited from use by police in the 1970s .
Amazon ’ s drone surveillance for your home , killer drone swarms , the PRISM program , GeoSpatial Intel .
The long game of total control and surveillance is coming together and the Artilect War looks likely .
Meanwhile , Kimmons ’ mother , who holds weekly protests calling on police to reopen her son @ @ @ @ @ @ @ explicit speech to the crowd , which included young children .
During her hour-long remarks , she also criticized some Black Lives Matter protesters for starting fires and perpetrating violence at a huge cost to the local community .
“ We need to ask these people to stop taking the meaning out of Black Lives Matter , ” Winston said .
Patrick Kimmons allegedly shot and wounded two men during an altercation before engaging with police who fired at him as he attempted to remove a gun from his waistband .
Kimmons ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was running away from police , while clearly injured from a gunshot , when officers continued firing at him .
Some 40 people have been shot and killed by Portland police since 2003 according to local media , a disproportionately high number of whom were black .
None of the officers faced any sanction .

As protesters gathered in Portland at a vigil for a black man killed by police two years ago, BLM security at the event were filmed tackling a man and placing him in a chokehold, which police are forbidden from using.
Hundreds of Black Lives Matter protesters attended the event held at Southwest Fourth Avenue and Harvey Milk Street, the scene of the fatal police shooting of 27-year-old Patrick Kimmons in 2018.
At one point, a young white man was seen moving quickly through the crowd before being unceremoniously steamrolled to the ground by ‘security’ at the event before being placed in a chokehold.
“Shut him down!” At the BLM-antifa gathering in Portland, the BLM “security” knocks a man to the ground, hits him and puts him in an elbow choke to force him out of the public rally. #PortlandRiots #antifa #BLM pic.twitter.com/bNs90LoTpX — Andy Ngô (@MrAndyNgo) October 1, 2020
Commenters online pointed out the obvious hypocrisy of a protest movement calling to defund the police for brutality during arrests using chokeholds that were prohibited from use by police in the 1970s.
Funny how they want to defund the police and then have their own police acting like this. — SanFran KAREN (@SanFranKAREN1) October 1, 2020
Of course “their” own “police” can use choke holds — Funky Cold Medina (@thatonemedina) October 1, 2020
I thought chokeholds were illeg… oh wait, I forgot it’s ok when they do it. pic.twitter.com/ij46NySMxE — Retro History 𝙕 (@Retro_History_z) October 1, 2020
Amazon’s drone surveillance for your home, killer drone swarms, the PRISM program, GeoSpatial Intel. The long game of total control and surveillance is coming together and the Artilect War looks likely.
Meanwhile, Kimmons’ mother, who holds weekly protests calling on police to reopen her son’s case, gave a sexually explicit speech to the crowd, which included young children.
Letha Winston, the mother of Patrick Kimmons, gives a sexually graphic speech at tonight’s BLM-antifa rally attended by families and young children. Kimmons was killed by Portland Police when he shot 2 people & aimed his gun at responding cops. #BLM pic.twitter.com/nY5jxwjs8h — Andy Ngô (@MrAndyNgo) October 1, 2020
During her hour-long remarks, she also criticized some Black Lives Matter protesters for starting fires and perpetrating violence at a huge cost to the local community.
“We need to ask these people to stop taking the meaning out of Black Lives Matter,” Winston said.
Patrick Kimmons allegedly shot and wounded two men during an altercation before engaging with police who fired at him as he attempted to remove a gun from his waistband.
Kimmons’ family and their supporters claim that he was running away from police, while clearly injured from a gunshot, when officers continued firing at him.
Some 40 people have been shot and killed by Portland police since 2003 according to local media, a disproportionately high number of whom were black. None of the officers faced any sanction.


newswars--2020-10-02--Chinese State Media Gloats About Trump Catching Coronavirus

The editor-in-chief of Chinese state media outlet the Global Times is gloating about how Trump catching coronavirus could ruin his re-election chances .
The Global Times is seen in the west as “ part of the Chinese government ’ s propaganda apparatus ” because it is under the umbrella of the Chinese Communist Party ’ s People ’ s Daily newspaper .
“ President Trump and the first lady have paid the price for his gamble to play down the COVID-19 , ” tweeted the outlet ’ s editor-in-chief Hu Xijin .
“ The news shows the severity of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ impose a negative impact on the image of Trump and the US , and may also negatively affect his reelection.
” In other words , one of the biggest mouthpieces of the Chinese Communist Party appears to be happy that Trump catching COVID could cost him the presidency .
As we previously highlighted , research shows that the Chinese government , via state media and social media bots , launched an aggressive propaganda campaign to exaggerate the severity of coronavirus in order to force the rest of the world into a draconian lockdown @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In celebrating Trump being diagnosed with COVID-19 , the Communist outlet is echoing the same sentiment expressed by segments of the media and leftists , whose immediate reaction to the news was exactly the same .
“ It ’ s a gigantic deal that a virus that originated in China — and spread globally due to the Chinese Communist Party ’ s lies — has now infected the president of the United States , ” tweeted Vince Coglianese .
“ China has imperiled the leader of the free world.
” In the age @ @ @ @ @ @ @ crucial that we stay in touch .
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here .
Also , I urgently need your financial support here .

The editor-in-chief of Chinese state media outlet the Global Times is gloating about how Trump catching coronavirus could ruin his re-election chances.
The Global Times is seen in the west as “part of the Chinese government’s propaganda apparatus” because it is under the umbrella of the Chinese Communist Party’s People’s Daily newspaper.
“President Trump and the first lady have paid the price for his gamble to play down the COVID-19,” tweeted the outlet’s editor-in-chief Hu Xijin.
“The news shows the severity of the US’ pandemic situation. It will impose a negative impact on the image of Trump and the US, and may also negatively affect his reelection.”
President Trump and the first lady have paid the price for his gamble to play down the COVID-19. The news shows the severity of the US’ pandemic situation. It will impose a negative impact on the image of Trump and the US, and may also negatively affect his reelection. — Hu Xijin 胡锡进 (@HuXijin_GT) October 2, 2020
In other words, one of the biggest mouthpieces of the Chinese Communist Party appears to be happy that Trump catching COVID could cost him the presidency.
As we previously highlighted, research shows that the Chinese government, via state media and social media bots, launched an aggressive propaganda campaign to exaggerate the severity of coronavirus in order to force the rest of the world into a draconian lockdown that would serve to benefit Beijing.
In celebrating Trump being diagnosed with COVID-19, the Communist outlet is echoing the same sentiment expressed by segments of the media and leftists, whose immediate reaction to the news was exactly the same.
“It’s a gigantic deal that a virus that originated in China — and spread globally due to the Chinese Communist Party’s lies — has now infected the president of the United States,” tweeted Vince Coglianese. “China has imperiled the leader of the free world.”
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Also, I urgently need your financial support here.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-10-02--Video: Democratic Ad Compares 2020 America To Nazi Germany

The Jewish Democratic Council of America is facing backlash after it produced a campaign ad that compared America under President Trump to Nazi Germany under Adolf Hitler .
The video , titled “ Hate doesn ’ t stop itself , it must be stopped , ” features a split screen with footage of Trump rallies , and by its side footage of nazi rallies from the 1930s .
For good measure , the Democrats threw in images of white supremacists from Charlottesville in 2017 , as well as images from the 2018 Pittsburgh synagogue attack .
“ History shows us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nationalism to divide their people , ” the narrator on the video states .
“ As antisemitism and white nationalism rise to dangerous levels in America , we are all less secure .
It ’ s time to show that we ’ ve learned from the darkest moments in history .
Hate doesn ’ t stop itself .
It must be stopped .
Vote — our future depends on it , ” the narration continues .
The ad is being targeted at Jewish voters in swing states such as Florida , Michigan and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that even the ADL , which routinely labels Trump a white supremacist , has denounced it as “ deeply offensive ” : “ This has no place in the presidential race and is deeply offensive to the memories of 6M+ Jews systematically exterminated during the Shoah , ” ADL head Jonathan Greenblatt tweeted .
“ We urge leaders & their surrogates to refrain from invoking the # Holocaust in the context of the current election .
It is not the same .
Stay focused on the issues , ” Greenblatt added .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have also called for the video to be removed .
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts joins The Alex Jones Show to break down the factions killing America .
“ We are warning against the ominous parallel of the rise of Nazism and the use of hatred for political purposes and the numerous signs that Donald Trump is doing the same , ” Soifer added .
The Trump campaign responded to the ad with the following statement : President Trump is the greatest ally the State of Israel has ever had in the White House @ @ @ @ @ @ @ against the President , Jewish Americans can see the truth for themselves through the President ’ s actions to fight against anti-Semitism , sign the historic Abraham Accords doing what no other President was able to do and bring peace to the Middle East , recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel , and tear up the disastrous Iran nuclear deal from the Obama-Biden administration .
The development comes in the wake of repeated comparisons of Trump ’ s America to Nazi Germany by Democrats .
Last weekend , Joe Biden directly compared @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Goebbels : Meanwhile , Representative Ilhan Omar ( D-MN ) said Thursday that she resents anyone who claims Trump is not a racist , saying that the US has a “ fascist in the White House .
”

The Jewish Democratic Council of America is facing backlash after it produced a campaign ad that compared America under President Trump to Nazi Germany under Adolf Hitler.
The video, titled “Hate doesn’t stop itself, it must be stopped,” features a split screen with footage of Trump rallies, and by its side footage of nazi rallies from the 1930s.
For good measure, the Democrats threw in images of white supremacists from Charlottesville in 2017, as well as images from the 2018 Pittsburgh synagogue attack.
Watch:
“History shows us what happens when leaders use hatred and nationalism to divide their people,” the narrator on the video states.
“As antisemitism and white nationalism rise to dangerous levels in America, we are all less secure. It’s time to show that we’ve learned from the darkest moments in history. Hate doesn’t stop itself. It must be stopped. Vote — our future depends on it,” the narration continues.
The ad is being targeted at Jewish voters in swing states such as Florida, Michigan and Pennsylvania.
The video is so crude that even the ADL, which routinely labels Trump a white supremacist, has denounced it as “deeply offensive”:
The video from @USJewishDems is the latest in growing references to Hitler, Goebbels or other Nazi leaders. This has no place in the presidential race and is deeply offensive to the memories of 6M+ Jews systematically exterminated during the Shoah. https://t.co/pvO89COrI6 — Jonathan Greenblatt (@JGreenblattADL) September 29, 2020
“This has no place in the presidential race and is deeply offensive to the memories of 6M+ Jews systematically exterminated during the Shoah,” ADL head Jonathan Greenblatt tweeted.
“We urge leaders & their surrogates to refrain from invoking the #Holocaust in the context of the current election. It is not the same. Stay focused on the issues,” Greenblatt added.
At the same time, we urge leaders & their surrogates to refrain from invoking the #Holocaust in the context of the current election. It is not the same. Stay focused on the issues. — Jonathan Greenblatt (@JGreenblattADL) September 29, 2020
The American Jewish Committee and Simon Wiesenthal Center have also called for the video to be removed.
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts joins The Alex Jones Show to break down the factions killing America.
JDCA’s executive director, Halie Soifer, defended the ad, stating “We’re not calling Donald Trump a Nazi.”
“We are warning against the ominous parallel of the rise of Nazism and the use of hatred for political purposes and the numerous signs that Donald Trump is doing the same,” Soifer added.
The Trump campaign responded to the ad with the following statement:
President Trump is the greatest ally the State of Israel has ever had in the White House. As Democrats increase their false attacks against the President, Jewish Americans can see the truth for themselves through the President’s actions to fight against anti-Semitism, sign the historic Abraham Accords doing what no other President was able to do and bring peace to the Middle East, recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, and tear up the disastrous Iran nuclear deal from the Obama-Biden administration.
The development comes in the wake of repeated comparisons of Trump’s America to Nazi Germany by Democrats.
Last weekend, Joe Biden directly compared Trump to the chief Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels:
.@JoeBiden liken @realDonaldTrump to Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels. Goebbels helped carry out the systematic murder of more than six million Jewish people. This is unacceptable, offensive and demeans the memory of the Holocaust. Biden must apologize! pic.twitter.com/HgncgsHQbe — Adam Milstein (@AdamMilstein) September 27, 2020
Meanwhile, Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) said Thursday that she resents anyone who claims Trump is not a racist, saying that the US has a “fascist in the White House.”


newswars--2020-10-02--CNN’s Don Lemon Suggests Trump Said Coronavirus Was a “Hoax”

CNN ’ s Don Lemon reacted to President Trump ’ s announcement that he had tested positive for coronavirus by suggesting it was payback for Trump calling the virus a “ hoax , ” something that never happened .
The remark was made during Lemon ’ s discussion with the network ’ s chief medical correspondent Sanjay Gupta .
“ Is this a moment of reckoning for the president and this administration ?
” asked Lemon .
“ For all of the — all of the pretending or looking the other way and trying to convince people otherwise of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it was for , to make sure that he was re-elected , to make sure that he had high standing with the public , or just to — for whatever reason .
Because of the economy.
” “ Is this now a moment of reckoning that — yes , this is real .
It is not a hoax .
It doesn ’ t care if you ’ re a Democrat or a Republican .
It is time to take this seriously , and all the preventative measures that the scientists , the doctors @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , have been touting for so long ?
” The notion that Trump dismissed corona as a “ hoax ” has been a talking point since the start of the pandemic , despite it being totally inaccurate .
He never said that .
Warning of the dangers of locking down society , something that innumerable experts have said will lead to economic catastrophe , mass poverty and huge numbers of excess deaths caused by people being afraid to go to hospital or denied treatment , isn ’ t the same as declaring coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ media knows this yet has deliberately removed all nuance from the debate to demonize lockdown skeptics in the same bracket as QAnon and other wild conspiracy theorists .
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch .
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here .
Also , I urgently need your financial support here .

CNN’s Don Lemon reacted to President Trump’s announcement that he had tested positive for coronavirus by suggesting it was payback for Trump calling the virus a “hoax,” something that never happened.
The remark was made during Lemon’s discussion with the network’s chief medical correspondent Sanjay Gupta.
“Is this a moment of reckoning for the president and this administration?” asked Lemon.
“For all of the — all of the pretending or looking the other way and trying to convince people otherwise of the science, for whatever reason — whether it was for, to make sure that he was re-elected, to make sure that he had high standing with the public, or just to — for whatever reason. Because of the economy.”
“Is this now a moment of reckoning that — yes, this is real. It is not a hoax. It doesn’t care if you’re a Democrat or a Republican. It is time to take this seriously, and all the preventative measures that the scientists, the doctors, like Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx, have been touting for so long?”
The notion that Trump dismissed corona as a “hoax” has been a talking point since the start of the pandemic, despite it being totally inaccurate. He never said that.
Warning of the dangers of locking down society, something that innumerable experts have said will lead to economic catastrophe, mass poverty and huge numbers of excess deaths caused by people being afraid to go to hospital or denied treatment, isn’t the same as declaring coronavirus to be a “hoax.”
The media knows this yet has deliberately removed all nuance from the debate to demonize lockdown skeptics in the same bracket as QAnon and other wild conspiracy theorists.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Also, I urgently need your financial support here.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-10-02--Washington Post Tweets “Imagine What it Will be Like Never to Have to Think About Trump Again” After

Washington Post Tweets “Imagine What it Will be Like Never to Have to Think About Trump Again” After Coronavirus Announcement

Despite being apparently unconnected to Trump ’ s announcement that he had contracted coronavirus , the Washington Post was forced to delete a tweet that stated , “ Opinion : Imagine what it will be like to never have to think about Trump again.
” Trump tweeted that he and Melania had tested positive for COVID-19 last night , prompting a wave of gloating and celebration from leftists and the media .
39 minutes later , the Washington Post tweeted a link to the story , with many believing it to be a reaction to the news .
However , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s website earlier on Thursday .
“ If you are like me and you watched Tuesday ’ s debate with a voice in your head screaming make it stop , take heart : We have the power to do just that , ” wrote Eugene Robinson .
“ We can evict President Trump from the territory he has forcibly seized in our minds .
We can — we must — vote him out of our thoughts.
” Around an hour after Trump revealed he had been diagnosed with coronavirus , Washington Post @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch .
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here .
Also , I urgently need your financial support here .

Despite being apparently unconnected to Trump’s announcement that he had contracted coronavirus, the Washington Post was forced to delete a tweet that stated, “Opinion: Imagine what it will be like to never have to think about Trump again.”
Trump tweeted that he and Melania had tested positive for COVID-19 last night, prompting a wave of gloating and celebration from leftists and the media.
39 minutes later, the Washington Post tweeted a link to the story, with many believing it to be a reaction to the news.
However, the column had been posted to WaPo’s website earlier on Thursday.
“If you are like me and you watched Tuesday’s debate with a voice in your head screaming make it stop, take heart: We have the power to do just that,” wrote Eugene Robinson. “We can evict President Trump from the territory he has forcibly seized in our minds. We can — we must — vote him out of our thoughts.”
Around an hour after Trump revealed he had been diagnosed with coronavirus, Washington Post deleted the tweet.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Also, I urgently need your financial support here.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-10-02--Medical Journal Calls For Mandatory Covid Vaccine: ‘Noncompliance Should Incur A Penalty’

A paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine has called for mandating a coronavirus vaccine , and outlined strategies for how Americans could be FORCED to take it .
The paper warns that an immediate mandate for the vaccine would spark too much resistance and backlash , so the writers suggest that at first it should be voluntary .
However , it suggests that if not enough people are willing to get the vaccine within the first few weeks of it ’ s availability , it should be transformed into an obligation , with penalties put into place @ @ @ @ @ @ @ six trigger criteria ” that need to be met before the vaccine is made mandatory , and that it should be rolled out to specific demographics of the population first .
“ Only recommended groups should be considered for a vaccination mandate , ” initially , according to the paper , which cites “ high risk groups ” as the first set of people .
“ [ T ] he elderly , health professionals working in high-risk situations or working with high-risk patients…persons with certain underlying medical conditions , ” as well as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prisons and dormitories ” should be mandated to get the jab , the paper says .
It also suggests that active-duty military service members should be among the first that are forced into the vaccination .
The paper proclaims that “ noncompliance should incur a penalty ” and notes that it should be a “ relatively substantial ” one .
It suggests that “ employment suspension or stay-at-home orders , ” should be issued , but that fines should be discouraged because they can be legally challenged , and “ may stoke distrust @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suggests that government health authorities should avoid making public their close relationship with vaccine manufacturers , to quell public mistrust .
Just coincidentally , the authors of the paper reside at Yale and Stanford , institutions that have received substantial funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for vaccine development .
Jon Rappoport joins The Alex Jones Show to break down the rollout of total medical tyranny in America .
The prospect of denying freedom of movement to those who refuse to vaccinate has been floated recently in the UK , where @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the jab should be made mandatory .
In the US , calls have been made to make any vaccination mandatory with the likes of the New York Times expressing concern that half of Americans would refuse to take it .
In Canada , a poll recently revealed that 60 per cent think that when a vaccine for coronavirus becomes available it should be made mandatory .
In addition , Canada ’ s current Chief Public Health Officer appeared in a recently resurfaced 2010 documentary in which she advocated using mandatory “ tracking bracelets @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a vaccine after a virus outbreak .

A paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine has called for mandating a coronavirus vaccine, and outlined strategies for how Americans could be FORCED to take it.
The paper warns that an immediate mandate for the vaccine would spark too much resistance and backlash, so the writers suggest that at first it should be voluntary.
However, it suggests that if not enough people are willing to get the vaccine within the first few weeks of it’s availability, it should be transformed into an obligation, with penalties put into place for refusal.
The paper outlines “six trigger criteria” that need to be met before the vaccine is made mandatory, and that it should be rolled out to specific demographics of the population first.
“Only recommended groups should be considered for a vaccination mandate,” initially, according to the paper, which cites “high risk groups” as the first set of people.
“[T]he elderly, health professionals working in high-risk situations or working with high-risk patients…persons with certain underlying medical conditions,” as well as those in “high-density settings such as prisons and dormitories” should be mandated to get the jab, the paper says.
It also suggests that active-duty military service members should be among the first that are forced into the vaccination.
The paper proclaims that “noncompliance should incur a penalty” and notes that it should be a “relatively substantial” one.
It suggests that “employment suspension or stay-at-home orders,” should be issued, but that fines should be discouraged because they can be legally challenged, and “may stoke distrust without improving uptake.”
The paper also suggests that government health authorities should avoid making public their close relationship with vaccine manufacturers, to quell public mistrust.
Just coincidentally, the authors of the paper reside at Yale and Stanford, institutions that have received substantial funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for vaccine development.
Jon Rappoport joins The Alex Jones Show to break down the rollout of total medical tyranny in America.
The prospect of denying freedom of movement to those who refuse to vaccinate has been floated recently in the UK, where government health officials have also suggested that the jab should be made mandatory.
In the US, calls have been made to make any vaccination mandatory with the likes of the New York Times expressing concern that half of Americans would refuse to take it.
In Canada, a poll recently revealed that 60 per cent think that when a vaccine for coronavirus becomes available it should be made mandatory.
In addition, Canada’s current Chief Public Health Officer appeared in a recently resurfaced 2010 documentary in which she advocated using mandatory “tracking bracelets” for people who refuse to take a vaccine after a virus outbreak.


newswars--2020-10-02--Leftists Celebrate Trump Covid Diagnosis

In news that will come as no surprise to anyone , but needs to be highlighted , leftists everywhere are @ @ @ @ @ Trump ’ s announcement that he and the First Lady have tested positive for Covid-19 @ @ @ @ @ that this positive test could indicate that Trump and his wife had the virus months @ @ @ @ @ .
Nevertheless , for leftists all their christmases have come at once : CNN immediately @ @ @ @ @ to take over the presidency now that Trump is “ suffering from a deadly virus @ @ @ @ @ “ inject bleach ” , or that the virus is a “ hoax ” but @ @ @ @ @ something that ’ s all that matters : This guy claims to be a doctor @ @ @ @ @ celebrates sickness ?
Others had a more nuanced take : This page could go on @ @

In news that will come as no surprise to anyone, but needs to be highlighted, leftists everywhere are hyperventilating and celebrating at President Trump’s announcement that he and the First Lady have tested positive for Covid-19.
Trump broke the news late Thursday:
Tonight, @FLOTUS and I tested positive for COVID-19. We will begin our quarantine and recovery process immediately. We will get through this TOGETHER! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 2, 2020
It has been noted that this positive test could indicate that Trump and his wife had the virus months ago and never exhibited symptoms.
Nevertheless, for leftists all their christmases have come at once:
full offense I hope donald trump dies — ☭ alejas tejas ☭ (@AlexisMarieYo) October 2, 2020
I guess this means I need to hope harder Trump dies slowly and painfully. https://t.co/ta1i6qd05O — AndrewC (@AndrewC_82) October 2, 2020
Damn I hope Trump dies from COVID — Stewart Mitchell (@StewjumMitchell) October 2, 2020
I hope you get a mutation of the virus that makes your anus fall off — Cam (@cameron_kasky) October 2, 2020
The very upset people on the right coming after me for addressing how delicious it is that Trump has corona virus are realllly ignoring the other several million now that their special little guy has it. At least they take it seriously for SOMEBODY — Cam (@cameron_kasky) October 2, 2020
He had it comin’, he had it comin’. 🎶 #TrumpHasCovid pic.twitter.com/5NWwboQ69h — Rob Gill (@vote4robgill) October 2, 2020
what a great way to start october #TrumpHasCovid pic.twitter.com/SomHU98xY8 — chloe ｸﾛｴ (@notchIoee) October 2, 2020
party in the usa !!!! #TrumpHasCovid pic.twitter.com/pDVpoohQuy — nathan 𐐪𐑂 walex au (@pixiewiIIie) October 2, 2020
CNN immediately started debating who is going to take over the presidency now that Trump is “suffering from a deadly virus”:
CNN analyst and former Obama official Sam Vinograd says this is the most DANGEROUS TIME EVER in the history of the United States government. pic.twitter.com/7x6ESG2Pmd — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) October 2, 2020
Trump never said “inject bleach”, or that the virus is a “hoax” but when leftists decide he said something that’s all that matters:
Have you tried injecting Bleach? I hear the smartest man said it’s a good idea? pic.twitter.com/bNLBISROX2 — Bearlissimo #BlackLivesMatter (@Bearlissimo1) October 2, 2020
How can you test positive for something that is a Democratic hoax? Why did you even take a test, as I thought you said that if you don’t get tested you can’t get it? — 👔Dan Whitfield For Arkansans (@DanWhitCongress) October 2, 2020
This guy claims to be a doctor. What kind of doctor celebrates sickness?
I have ZERO sympathy for you or your family. As an ER doc, I’ve lost 3 colleagues and a 27 y.o. healthy cousin to this virus. You’re the reason 207,000 Americans are dead and over 1,200 healthcare workers. You’ve failed AMERICA. I can’t wait to VOTE YOU OUT!!! — Cleavon MD (@Cleavon_MD) October 2, 2020
Others had a more nuanced take:
Good morning Twitter. It’s currently 3:27 a.m. and since #TrumpHasCovid I’m encouraging all of you to pray for Joe and Jill Biden’s health since they were exposed to the the spewing, germ ball on Tuesday 🙏🏻 thank you pic.twitter.com/iJuQWz7JHE — Devon 🌊 (@cali4nia_devon) October 2, 2020
Maybe you’ll issue a FEDERAL MASK MANDATE Now. — The Resistor Sister ♥🇺🇸🦅🙏🏻 (@the_resistor) October 2, 2020
I think it’s an election stunt 🤷🏽♀ — ♡ ☥ 𝓘’𝓶𝓑𝓵𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓭 ♀♡ (@1mb1essed) October 2, 2020
I’m glad Trump has COVID, I hope he doesn’t die. The people have to decide for themselves that people like Trump cannot be trusted. Him dying solves one problem when him being proved wrong solves and prevents many.
Thank you. — Rowan is dummy (@RowanThistle) October 2, 2020
This page could go on for ever…
Donald Trump targeted by vile trolls saying ‘hope he dies’ after covid diagnosis https://t.co/VhIhPU9OEb you know who you are. — Celine (@Celinetruths01) October 2, 2020
yea i hope trump dies!! do i feel bad for this? absolutely not 😍 — lila • erwin’s month!! (@smithvrman) October 2, 2020
happy birthday! hope trump dies today just for u! — snowboiiii (@snowboiiii) October 2, 2020
Omg trump has corona I hope he learns from his mistakes (or die kind of ) — 𝔸𝕝𝕖𝕩 (@littleangellex) October 2, 2020
LETS GOOOOOOOOOO — Jonathan Brookshire (@JBrookshire910) October 2, 2020
Just got the call RIP Trump pic.twitter.com/1gxMofjt30 — Jr (@GettinMoneyJr) October 2, 2020


newswars--2020-10-02--CNN’s Cuomo, Lemon: If Hicks, Trump Had Worn Masks ‘We May Not Be in This Situation’

Shortly before the White House revealed President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump announced they had tested positive for COVID-19 late on Friday , CNN ’ s Chris Cuomo and Don Lemon were discussing the fallout from White House aide Hope Hicks ’ positive test for the virus .
Cuomo suggested that had Hicks and President Trump worn masks , Trump may have avoided quarantine , which as Cuomo described as Trump being forced to “ pull a Biden , ” referring to Trump ’ s Democratic opponent former Vice President Joe Biden ’ s lack of public appearances @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ If [ Hicks ] had had a mask on , and if [ Trump ] had had a mask on , ” Cuomo said .
“ This is more about a person at the top setting the example , ” Lemon interrupted .
“ If the president had said — if he had made it mandatory in his meetings when he ’ s in contact with her to wear a mask , then we may not be in this situation.
” “ He just needed to pull a Biden .
If he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nobody would be making fun of him because he ’ s the only one who makes cracks about masks .
”

Shortly before the White House revealed President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump announced they had tested positive for COVID-19 late on Friday, CNN’s Chris Cuomo and Don Lemon were discussing the fallout from White House aide Hope Hicks’ positive test for the virus.
CNN‘s Cuomo, Lemon: If Hicks, Trump Had Worn Masks ‘We May Not Be in This Situation‘ https://t.co/RDjL7z3y26 via @BreitbartNews OK Chris. Now do your brother, and Pelosi, and Feinstein. While you’re at it remember when you left the house DURING your quarantine? — Timothy Horgan (@WhirlingTim) October 2, 2020
Cuomo suggested that had Hicks and President Trump worn masks, Trump may have avoided quarantine, which as Cuomo described as Trump being forced to “pull a Biden,” referring to Trump’s Democratic opponent former Vice President Joe Biden’s lack of public appearances and efforts to campaign from home.
“If [Hicks] had had a mask on, and if [Trump] had had a mask on,” Cuomo said.
“This is more about a person at the top setting the example,” Lemon interrupted. “If the president had said — if he had made it mandatory in his meetings when he’s in contact with her to wear a mask, then we may not be in this situation.”
“He just needed to pull a Biden. If he had had that mask on everywhere, nobody would be making fun of him because he’s the only one who makes cracks about masks.”


newswars--2020-10-02--Presidential Debate Moderator Steve Scully Interned For Joe Biden, Reportedly Bashed Trump On Twitte

Presidential Debate Moderator Steve Scully Interned For Joe Biden, Reportedly Bashed Trump On Twitter

The next presidential debate between President Donald Trump and Senator Joe Biden will feature a moderator who served as a Biden intern , and has reportedly criticized Trump on social media .
Many viewers of the first presidential debate on Tuesday night were outraged at the perceived pro-Biden bias of moderator Chris Wallace , who routinely interrupted Trump and promoted left-wing talking points such as the supposed rising threat of white supremacist militias and the virtues of critical race theory , or “ racial sensitivity training.
” However , the next debate moderator , CSPAN host Steve Scully , has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ flamboyant partisan than Wallace .
Scully served as an intern for none other than Delaware Senator Joe Biden , and went on to serve as a “ staff assistant in Sen. Edward M. Kennedy ’ s communication office.
” Biden and Kennedy are two of the most high-profile Democrat senators in modern American history .
Ali Alexander joins The Alex Jones Show to break down his recent viral video showing Trump denouncing White Supremacy and the KKK to Chris Wallace ’ s face .
The friendship between Biden and Scully appears to have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ several decades later in 2016 the CSPAN host posted a picture of him and Biden together at a party with the caption , “ Got ta love the @ VP at the Biden Beach Bash ’ 16.
” Scully and Biden stand together with beaming smiles in the photograph .
Additionally , multiple screenshots are circulating that appear to show an undated Scully Twitter post featuring a New York Times article headlined , “ No , Not Trump , Not Ever.
” The tweets appear to have been deleted from Scully ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ website Journalism Jobs in 2004 , Scully took multiple digs at Republican-friendly cable channel Fox News , such as , “ if you ’ re sick and tired of watching Laci Peterson on the Fox News Channel , then you can come on to C-SPAN and understand the process that we do in following it , ” and “ We are seeing more opinionated journalism on Fox , Sean Hannity , Bill O ’ Reilly , the whole incident with Dan Rather .
Because they ’ ve become celebrities and because they make @ @ @ @ @ @ @ homes , that ’ s the evolution of where we are today in the media environment .
”

The next presidential debate between President Donald Trump and Senator Joe Biden will feature a moderator who served as a Biden intern, and has reportedly criticized Trump on social media.
Many viewers of the first presidential debate on Tuesday night were outraged at the perceived pro-Biden bias of moderator Chris Wallace, who routinely interrupted Trump and promoted left-wing talking points such as the supposed rising threat of white supremacist militias and the virtues of critical race theory, or “racial sensitivity training.”
However, the next debate moderator, CSPAN host Steve Scully, has been accused of being an even more flamboyant partisan than Wallace.
Scully served as an intern for none other than Delaware Senator Joe Biden, and went on to serve as a “staff assistant in Sen. Edward M. Kennedy’s communication office.” Biden and Kennedy are two of the most high-profile Democrat senators in modern American history.
Ali Alexander joins The Alex Jones Show to break down his recent viral video showing Trump denouncing White Supremacy and the KKK to Chris Wallace’s face.
The friendship between Biden and Scully appears to have remained rock-solid over the years, as several decades later in 2016 the CSPAN host posted a picture of him and Biden together at a party with the caption, “Gotta love the @VP at the Biden Beach Bash ’16.”
Gotta love the @VP at the Biden Beach Bash ’16 pic.twitter.com/Z9gdC6Cmi1 — Steve Scully (@SteveScully) June 4, 2016
Scully and Biden stand together with beaming smiles in the photograph.
Additionally, multiple screenshots are circulating that appear to show an undated Scully Twitter post featuring a New York Times article headlined, “No, Not Trump, Not Ever.”
What exactly does the 2nd Debate Monitor Steve Scully mean when he tweeted: “No, Not Trump, Not Ever” pic.twitter.com/c7BUo3nJsn — Christi Chat (@ChatChristi) October 1, 2020
It appears Scully has a little long-term bias. pic.twitter.com/DHuep5nVLO — The Last Mohican (@TheLastMohicans) October 1, 2020
The tweets appear to have been deleted from Scully’s Twitter profile.
In an interview with website Journalism Jobs in 2004, Scully took multiple digs at Republican-friendly cable channel Fox News, such as, “if you’re sick and tired of watching Laci Peterson on the Fox News Channel, then you can come on to C-SPAN and understand the process that we do in following it,” and “We are seeing more opinionated journalism on Fox, Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, the whole incident with Dan Rather. Because they’ve become celebrities and because they make so much money and are in our homes, that’s the evolution of where we are today in the media environment.”


newswars--2020-10-02--Why say ‘riot’ when you can be vague and sensitive instead, AP Stylebook urges in newest Orwellian g

Why say ‘riot’ when you can be vague and sensitive instead, AP Stylebook urges in newest Orwellian guidelines

Used as the journalism Bible by most English-language media , the AP Stylebook has updated its guidance for employing the word ‘ riot , ’ citing the need to avoid “ stigmatizing ” groups protesting “ for racial justice.
” While acknowledging the dictionary definition of riot as a “ wild or violent disturbance of the peace , ” AP said the word somehow “ suggests uncontrolled chaos and pandemonium.
” Worse yet , “ Focusing on rioting and property destruction rather than underlying grievance has been used in the past to stigmatize broad swaths of people protesting against lynching @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” the Stylebook account tweeted on Wednesday .
The claim that something has been used in the past in a racist way has already led to banishing many English terms to the Orwellian “ memory hole.
” It certainly appears the AP is trying to do the same with “ riot ” now .
FBI Director looked the other way on Clinton & the conspiracy against Trump .
Now he says “ Antifa is just an idea ” and Biden repeats the claim .
“ Ideas ” to commit crimes is Criminal Conspiracy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ committed .
But crimes were committed .
Instead of promoting precision , the Stylebook is urging reporters to use euphemisms such as “ protest ” or “ demonstration.
” It advises “ revolt ” and “ uprising ” if the violence is directed “ against powerful groups or governing systems , ” in an alarming shift in focus from what is being done towards who is doing it to whom .
There is even a helpful suggestion to use “ unrest ” because it ’ s “ a vaguer , milder and less @ @ @ @ @ @ @ discontent and protest verging on revolt.
” Translated to plain English , this means a lot more mentions of “ unrest ” and almost no references to “ riot , ” in media coverage going forward , regardless of how much actual rioting is happening .
Mainstream media across the US have already gone out of their way to avoid labeling what has unfolded since the death of George Floyd in May as “ riots.
” Though protests in Minneapolis , Minnesota turned violent within 48 hours , before spreading to other cities @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – the media continued calling them “ peaceful ” and “ protests for racial justice.
” Yet in just the first two weeks of the riots , 20 people have been killed and the property damage has exceeded $ 2 billion , according to insurance estimates – the highest in US history .
AP is no stranger to changing the language to better comport to ‘ proper ’ political sensitivities .
At the height of the riots in June , the Stylebook decided to capitalize “ Black ” and “ Indigenous ” in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sense.
” A month later , the expected decision to leave “ white ” in lowercase was justified by saying that “ White people in general have much less shared history and culture , and don ’ t have the experience of being discriminated against because of skin color.
” Moreover , “ Capitalizing the term ‘ white , ’ as is done by white supremacists , risks subtly conveying legitimacy to such beliefs , ” wrote AP ’ s vice-president for standards John Daniszewski .
The Associated Press Stylebook and Briefing on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ goes , has effectively dictated the tone of English-language outlets around the world since it first appeared in 1953 .
It is also required reference material in journalism schools .
So when it embraces vagueness over precision and worrying about “ suggestions ” and “ subtly conveying ” things over plain meaning , that rings especially Orwellian – in both the ‘ 1984 ’ sense of censoring speech and thought and regarding the corruption of language the author lamented in his famous 1946 essay ‘ Politics and the English language.
’ AP is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Newspeak under the penalty of torture .
As it turns out , it doesn ’ t have to be .
A bit of updated style – and thought – guidance announced on Twitter from time to time will do .

Used as the journalism Bible by most English-language media, the AP Stylebook has updated its guidance for employing the word ‘riot,’ citing the need to avoid “stigmatizing” groups protesting “for racial justice.”
While acknowledging the dictionary definition of riot as a “wild or violent disturbance of the peace,” AP said the word somehow “suggests uncontrolled chaos and pandemonium.”
Worse yet, “Focusing on rioting and property destruction rather than underlying grievance has been used in the past to stigmatize broad swaths of people protesting against lynching, police brutality or for racial justice…” the Stylebook account tweeted on Wednesday.
Focusing on rioting and property destruction rather than underlying grievance has been used in the past to stigmatize broad swaths of people protesting against lynching, police brutality or for racial justice, going back to the urban uprisings of the 1960s. (2/5) — APStylebook (@APStylebook) September 30, 2020
The claim that something has been used in the past in a racist way has already led to banishing many English terms to the Orwellian “memory hole.” It certainly appears the AP is trying to do the same with “riot” now.
FBI Director looked the other way on Clinton & the conspiracy against Trump. Now he says “Antifa is just an idea” and Biden repeats the claim. “Ideas” to commit crimes is Criminal Conspiracy even if the crime isn’t committed. But crimes were committed.
Instead of promoting precision, the Stylebook is urging reporters to use euphemisms such as “protest” or “demonstration.” It advises “revolt” and “uprising” if the violence is directed “against powerful groups or governing systems,” in an alarming shift in focus from what is being done towards who is doing it to whom.
There is even a helpful suggestion to use “unrest” because it’s “a vaguer, milder and less emotional term for a condition of angry discontent and protest verging on revolt.”
Translated to plain English, this means a lot more mentions of “unrest” and almost no references to “riot,” in media coverage going forward, regardless of how much actual rioting is happening.
Mainstream media across the US have already gone out of their way to avoid labeling what has unfolded since the death of George Floyd in May as “riots.” Though protests in Minneapolis, Minnesota turned violent within 48 hours, before spreading to other cities across the US – and even internationally – the media continued calling them “peaceful” and “protests for racial justice.”
Yet in just the first two weeks of the riots, 20 people have been killed and the property damage has exceeded $2 billion, according to insurance estimates – the highest in US history.
AP is no stranger to changing the language to better comport to ‘proper’ political sensitivities. At the height of the riots in June, the Stylebook decided to capitalize“Black” and “Indigenous” in a “racial, ethnic or cultural sense.”
A month later, the expected decision to leave “white” in lowercase was justified by saying that “White people in general have much less shared history and culture, and don’t have the experience of being discriminated against because of skin color.”
Moreover, “Capitalizing the term ‘white,’ as is done by white supremacists, risks subtly conveying legitimacy to such beliefs,” wrote AP’s vice-president for standards John Daniszewski.
The Associated Press Stylebook and Briefing on Media Law, as its full name goes, has effectively dictated the tone of English-language outlets around the world since it first appeared in 1953. It is also required reference material in journalism schools.
So when it embraces vagueness over precision and worrying about “suggestions” and “subtly conveying” things over plain meaning, that rings especially Orwellian – in both the ‘1984’ sense of censoring speech and thought and regarding the corruption of language the author lamented in his famous 1946 essay ‘Politics and the English language.’
AP is hardly the Ministry of Truth, dictating Newspeak under the penalty of torture. As it turns out, it doesn’t have to be. A bit of updated style – and thought – guidance announced on Twitter from time to time will do.


newswars--2020-10-02--Melania Trump Comes Off Looking Great In Tapes Secretly Recorded by Low-Life Backstabbing ‘Friend’

Low-life backstabber Stephanie Winston Wolkoff on Thursday released secretly recorded tapes of conversations with Melania Trump and it only made @ @ @ @ @ Wolkoff , a New York cosmopolitan socialite who is trying to profit off a new @ @ @ @ @ tapes over to Jeff Zucker ’ s CNN which Anderson Cooper aired on his show @ @ @ @ @ great : How could anyone see the way all the most despicable cretins on the @ @ @ @ @ family and not want to vote for him just out of spite ?
Owen exposes @ @ @ @ @ multiple votes by those on the left .

Low-life backstabber Stephanie Winston Wolkoff on Thursday released secretly recorded tapes of conversations with Melania Trump and it only made Melania look even better.
Wolkoff, a New York cosmopolitan socialite who is trying to profit off a new book, sent secretly recorded tapes over to Jeff Zucker’s CNN which Anderson Cooper aired on his show.
Melania came off looking great:
Melania comes off looking great here. pic.twitter.com/JewWP510LH — David Reaboi (@davereaboi) October 2, 2020
How could anyone see the way all the most despicable cretins on the planet hate Trump and his family and not want to vote for him just out of spite?
Owen exposes the agenda to cheat with multiple votes by those on the left.