newswars--2020-09-02--Report: NFL Star To Honor Fallen Police Captain David Dorn Who Was Killed By BLM Looters

The Jacksonville Jaguars ’ new tight end Tyler Eifert , who previously played with the Cincinnati Bengals , will allegedly honor retired St. Louis police captain David Dorn by wearing his name on his helmet .
Dorn , who was African American , was shot and killed while trying to protect his friend ’ s pawn shop during the St. Louis riots on June 2 following the death of George Floyd .
Hamilton County , Ohio Republican Party Chairman Alex Triantafilou broke the news on Twitter Tuesday , writing , “ Got some very good news from former Bengals player/current @ @ @ @ @ @ @ honor fallen police officer David Dorns on his helmet .
Always been a fan of Tyler ’ s and God bless him !
” Dorn ’ s widow , Ann Dorn , spoke at the RNC last week to voice her support for President Trump and to speak out against the violent protests currently taking place throughout our country .
The NFL recently announced players will be allowed to put the names of Americans killed by police on their helmet padding , allowing them to pick from a pre-selected list of names .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ being shot by police and was instead paralyzed from the waist down , the name Jacob Blake was placed on New Orleans Saints quarterback Drew Brees ’ helmet during a practice last week .
Blake allegedly raped a woman before being shot and Brees appears to be virtue signaling to make up for daring to express his respect for the American flag in a June interview he chose to apologize for .
However , it was just four years ago that the NFL refused to allow the Dallas Cowboys to wear helmet decals @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Department who were shot and killed by a man with a sniper rifle .
Will the NFL fine Eifert if he dares put the name of David Dorn on his helmet ?
In 2017 , Eifert wore cleats honoring former Arizona Cardinals safety Pat Tillman , who died under suspicious circumstances while serving in the U.S. Army Rangers in 2004 after quitting the NFL to fight for his country .
Eifert wrote a powerful essay on Medium in 2017 giving his personal reasons for standing for the flag instead of kneeling during the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ probably be best to stay out of it , but when you believe in something as much as I do it gets to a point where you want both sides to be heard .
I am not questioning anyone ’ s reasons or rights to protest , but instead the method .
This entire protest about raising awareness for racial inequality has gotten lost in the media and turned into a debate about whether to sit or stand for the national anthem .
I want to take this time to remind everyone why @ @ @ @ @ @ @ love my country .
I stand because I want to honor the people putting their lives on the line for me on a daily basis in the Army , Navy , Marine Corps , Air Force , and Coast Guard .
I stand because my cousin is a pilot in the United States Air Force , risking his life flying F-15s in active war zones .
He takes pride in his job protecting Americans , a sacrifice that all members of every branch of the United States military willfully take .

The Jacksonville Jaguars’ new tight end Tyler Eifert, who previously played with the Cincinnati Bengals, will allegedly honor retired St. Louis police captain David Dorn by wearing his name on his helmet.
Dorn, who was African American, was shot and killed while trying to protect his friend’s pawn shop during the St. Louis riots on June 2 following the death of George Floyd.
Hamilton County, Ohio Republican Party Chairman Alex Triantafilou broke the news on Twitter Tuesday, writing, “Got some very good news from former Bengals player/current Jaguars player Tyler Eifert that he will honor fallen police officer David Dorns on his helmet. Always been a fan of Tyler’s and God bless him!”
Dorn’s widow, Ann Dorn, spoke at the RNC last week to voice her support for President Trump and to speak out against the violent protests currently taking place throughout our country.
The NFL recently announced players will be allowed to put the names of Americans killed by police on their helmet padding, allowing them to pick from a pre-selected list of names.
While he didn’t die after being shot by police and was instead paralyzed from the waist down, the name Jacob Blake was placed on New Orleans Saints quarterback Drew Brees’ helmet during a practice last week.
Blake allegedly raped a woman before being shot and Brees appears to be virtue signaling to make up for daring to express his respect for the American flag in a June interview he chose to apologize for.
However, it was just four years ago that the NFL refused to allow the Dallas Cowboys to wear helmet decals to honor members of the Dallas Police Department who were shot and killed by a man with a sniper rifle.
Several years ago @NFL refused to allow @JasonWitten and the @dallascowboys to have a helmet decal honoring five Dallas police killed by a BLM supporter. Now NFL is allowing names of people killed by police on helmets. This is a hypocritical disaster: https://t.co/G2w3aqG89M — Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) August 31, 2020
Will the NFL fine Eifert if he dares put the name of David Dorn on his helmet?
In 2017, Eifert wore cleats honoring former Arizona Cardinals safety Pat Tillman, who died under suspicious circumstances while serving in the U.S. Army Rangers in 2004 after quitting the NFL to fight for his country.
My cleats for tomorrow’s game and my reason why I stand for the National Anthem. Pat Tillman. For more info, go here https://t.co/7qRA8pwB8G pic.twitter.com/lgbnqkchvP — Tyler Eifert (@tylereifert) September 9, 2017
Eifert wrote a powerful essay on Medium in 2017 giving his personal reasons for standing for the flag instead of kneeling during the national anthem.
The star tight end wrote:
I know it would probably be best to stay out of it, but when you believe in something as much as I do it gets to a point where you want both sides to be heard. I am not questioning anyone’s reasons or rights to protest, but instead the method. This entire protest about raising awareness for racial inequality has gotten lost in the media and turned into a debate about whether to sit or stand for the national anthem. I want to take this time to remind everyone why I stand.
I stand because I love my country. I stand because I want to honor the people putting their lives on the line for me on a daily basis in the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and Coast Guard. I stand because my cousin is a pilot in the United States Air Force, risking his life flying F-15s in active war zones. He takes pride in his job protecting Americans, a sacrifice that all members of every branch of the United States military willfully take.


newswars--2020-09-02--Oregon State Troopers Federally Deputized Amid Portland Riots

State police officers in Oregon have been federally deputized as Portland riots rage out of control and the local district attorney refuses to prosecute certain misdemeanors , according to reports .
Some Oregon State Police ( OSP ) officers have received cross-deputization from the U.S .
Marshals Service , authorizing them to enforce federal law , while also enabling the Department of Justice ( DOJ ) to pursue charges against rioters who commit crimes against these officers or disobey their orders .
“ Oregon State Police are sending in federally deputized troopers to respond to protest-related violence in Portland — @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s office , which OSP has criticized in the past for not prioritizing prosecutions , ” independent journalist Deborah Bloom reported on Wednesday .
“ This means state troopers can now crack down on protestors in Portland knowing they ’ ll likely face harsher punishment from the US Attorney ’ s Office rather than the local DA.
” Bloom reports an OSP spokesperson informed her the agency is “ not criticizing any officials and we respect the authority of the District Attorney , but to meet the Governor ’ s charge of bringing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all lawful methods at our disposal.
” The move was reportedly made in late July , but is now receiving more attention as the federal government increases pressure on state and local officials to put an end to surging violence and acts of domestic terrorism in Portland .
“ They are still Oregon State Police , ” a spokesman for Oregon Gov .
Kate Brown told KGW .
“ Some OSP troopers were federally deputized earlier this summer in order to be able to even enter the Hatfield Courthouse during their assignment downtown.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ with our community , with the goal of protecting free speech , keeping the peace , and keeping people safe as they exercise their right to peacefully protest.
” Portland has been rocked by nearly 100 straight days of violent riots , arson , and a recent homicide .
Alex Jones breaks down how leftists are ramping up support for violent acts in the streets of America ahead of the divisive 2020 presidential election .

State police officers in Oregon have been federally deputized as Portland riots rage out of control and the local district attorney refuses to prosecute certain misdemeanors, according to reports.
Some Oregon State Police (OSP) officers have received cross-deputization from the U.S. Marshals Service, authorizing them to enforce federal law, while also enabling the Department of Justice (DOJ) to pursue charges against rioters who commit crimes against these officers or disobey their orders.
This means state troopers can now crack down on protestors in Portland knowing they’ll likely face harsher punishment from the US Attorney’s Office rather than the local DA. — Deborah Bloom (@deborahebloom) September 1, 2020
“Oregon State Police are sending in federally deputized troopers to respond to protest-related violence in Portland — effectively circumventing the Multnomah County DA’s office, which OSP has criticized in the past for not prioritizing prosecutions,” independent journalist Deborah Bloom reported on Wednesday.
“This means state troopers can now crack down on protestors in Portland knowing they’ll likely face harsher punishment from the US Attorney’s Office rather than the local DA.”
Bloom reports an OSP spokesperson informed her the agency is “not criticizing any officials and we respect the authority of the District Attorney, but to meet the Governor’s charge of bringing violence to an end we will use all lawful methods at our disposal.”
The move was reportedly made in late July, but is now receiving more attention as the federal government increases pressure on state and local officials to put an end to surging violence and acts of domestic terrorism in Portland.
“They are still Oregon State Police,” a spokesman for Oregon Gov. Kate Brown told KGW. “Some OSP troopers were federally deputized earlier this summer in order to be able to even enter the Hatfield Courthouse during their assignment downtown.”
“They are committed to working with our community, with the goal of protecting free speech, keeping the peace, and keeping people safe as they exercise their right to peacefully protest.”
Portland has been rocked by nearly 100 straight days of violent riots, arson, and a recent homicide.
Alex Jones breaks down how leftists are ramping up support for violent acts in the streets of America ahead of the divisive 2020 presidential election.
Dan Lyman: Follow @CitizenAnalyst


newswars--2020-09-02--Hiden’ Biden Stumbles, Lies, Flubs During Campaign Speech

Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden – dubbed “ Joe Hiden ’ ” Wednesday by President Trump – emerged from his basement to deliver a speech in Wilmington , Delaware rebuking President Trump , and true to form , the entire affair was a disaster .
During his awkward speech on Wednesday , Biden lied about his delayed coronavirus response and the Portland Antifa shooting that resulted in the cold-blooded murder of a Trump supporter , all while constantly stumbling and fumbling his way through .
Throughout his remarks , Biden stammered and made several nonsensical remarks .
He also appeared @ @ @ @ @ @ @ media questions on his behalf .
At one point , after just claiming the judicial system should “ work its way ” through the police shooting in Kenosha , Wisconsin , he immediately asserted that the officer who shot Blake should be charged .
Biden then added that the Antifa shooter who killed a Trump supporter in cold blood should only “ be investigated.
” While speaking about President Trump ’ s coronavirus response , Biden backtracked on his previous calls to implement a nationwide mask mandate , and blamed Trump for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ noting that Biden also held rallies until March , well after the pandemic was underway in America .
Biden even admitted that as long as Trump helps people economically throughout this crisis , his own words and actions won ’ t have much of an impact on the electorate .
This is just another Biden speech that showcases why the Democrat Party is keen on keeping him out of public view as much as possible before Election Day .
Joe Biden finally stumbled free of his basement this week only to immediately put @ @ @ @ @ @ @ incoherent and uninspiring speech delivered to an empty auditorium .

Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden – dubbed “Joe Hiden’” Wednesday by President Trump – emerged from his basement to deliver a speech in Wilmington, Delaware rebuking President Trump, and true to form, the entire affair was a disaster.
During his awkward speech on Wednesday, Biden lied about his delayed coronavirus response and the Portland Antifa shooting that resulted in the cold-blooded murder of a Trump supporter, all while constantly stumbling and fumbling his way through.
Throughout his remarks, Biden stammered and made several nonsensical remarks.
BIDEN to TRUMP: “Stop your boast about — never being — seemed at you — you can do anything.” pic.twitter.com/dkGZPcKQPm — Benny (@bennyjohnson) September 2, 2020
“And so what I’ve done is I’ve met with via via what I did this morning with the medical experts.” -Joe Biden. Biden appears to have forgotten what he did just a few hours ago. pic.twitter.com/xqDhALoH1s — Francis Brennan (@FrancisBrennan) September 2, 2020
He also appeared confused as his handlers tried to field media questions on his behalf.
Too many “handlers” confuse Joe Biden easily
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 pic.twitter.com/PTfLLGKDlr — 🇺🇸🇺🇸 Miguelifornia (@michaelbeatty3) September 2, 2020
Joe Biden is having his staff call on reporters for him. Why is Biden unable to take questions from reporters on his own? pic.twitter.com/GoVeGlMfvg — Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) September 2, 2020
At one point, after just claiming the judicial system should “work its way” through the police shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin, he immediately asserted that the officer who shot Blake should be charged.
Holy crap. Biden just said that Aaron “Jay” Danielson, the Trump supporter who was killed in Portland was there “inciting response” Jay was walking on the street with a friend, targeted, and executed in cold blood by Antifa. pic.twitter.com/YybuyWUNdo — Courtney Holland 🇺🇸 (@hollandcourtney) September 2, 2020
Biden then added that the Antifa shooter who killed a Trump supporter in cold blood should only “be investigated.”
In Joe Biden’s America, his Antifa thugs don’t get charged and cops don’t get due process. https://t.co/bqefCYGSCi — BDW (@BryanDeanWright) September 2, 2020
While speaking about President Trump’s coronavirus response, Biden backtracked on his previous calls to implement a nationwide mask mandate, and blamed Trump for the coronavirus pandemic despite a Fox News reporter noting that Biden also held rallies until March, well after the pandemic was underway in America.
. @pdoocy just grabbed Joe Biden on his way out and asked why he was still hosting rallies in MARCH if he was supposedly warning Trump about the seriousness of COVID-19 in JANUARY. Biden had no response whatsoever and went on a long rant to deflect from his hypocrisy. pic.twitter.com/astVPWosGO — Kelb Hull (@CalebJHull) September 2, 2020
Two weeks ago, Joe Biden called for a “Mask Mandate Nationwide”. Now he’s backtracking. pic.twitter.com/CTGZS5REw1 — Benny (@bennyjohnson) September 2, 2020
Biden even admitted that as long as Trump helps people economically throughout this crisis, his own words and actions won’t have much of an impact on the electorate.
Joe Biden laments “it doesn’t matter what I say,” President @realDonaldTrump‘s policies are “reducing the number of people who are in real trouble economically” pic.twitter.com/ASNRpE2CwS — Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) September 2, 2020
This is just another Biden speech that showcases why the Democrat Party is keen on keeping him out of public view as much as possible before Election Day.
Joe Biden finally stumbled free of his basement this week only to immediately put his foot in his mouth with another incoherent and uninspiring speech delivered to an empty auditorium.


newswars--2020-09-02--Roger Stone Responds to Latest Polls Showing A Trump Landslide: Livestream

Also catch the streams at infowars.com/show and Banned.video .
The UN is now exerting its control over the global Covid-19 @ @ @ @ @ & more !
This is a takeover Tune in as we reveal how the globalists @ @ @ @ @ war against the nation states : David Knight Show : Injecting Politics – The Cynicism @ @ @ @ @ Politicization of Medicine Share this censored link to join Infowars in the fight for free @ @ @ @ @ of The David Knight Show , your host exposes the tyranny coming for America as @ @ @ @ @ shows a pregnant woman being arrested for planning an anti-mask protest on social media .
@ @ @ @ @ caught on camera going to a beauty salon without a mask despite mandatory mask laws @ @ @ @ @ that hair salons are supposed to be closed , according to the state ’ s @ @ @ @ @ ”

Owen Shroyer hosts this LIVE edition of War Room, weekdays 3-6 p.m. CT.
Also catch the streams at infowars.com/show and Banned.video.
Alex Jones Show: Australia Has Fallen to UN Control, Mass Arrests Beginning!
The UN is now exerting its control over the global Covid-19 response, borders, self-defense & more! This is a takeover
Tune in as we reveal how the globalists are using Covid-19 to wage war against the nation states:
Follow Alex Jones on Telegram:
David Knight Show: Injecting Politics – The Cynicism of Operation Warp Speed & Politicization of Medicine
Share this censored link to join Infowars in the fight for free speech
On this Wednesday edition of The David Knight Show, your host exposes the tyranny coming for America as a video out of Australia shows a pregnant woman being arrested for planning an anti-mask protest on social media.
Meanwhile, Nancy Pelosi was caught on camera going to a beauty salon without a mask despite mandatory mask laws in California and the fact that hair salons are supposed to be closed, according to the state’s COVID lockdown “rules.”
Watch Live: Injecting Politics: The Cynicism of #OperationWarpSpeed & Politicization of Medicine https://t.co/uXRVeZ61P5 — David Knight (@libertytarian) September 2, 2020


newswars--2020-09-02--“Roast of Brian Stelter”: C-SPAN Appearance Goes South for CNN Fake Newser

C-SPAN callers dunked on CNN ’ s Brian Stelter Tuesday , roasting the Reliable Sources host over his network ’ s blatant anti-Trump bias and its disingenuous coverage of the riots in Kenosha , Wisconsin .
Appearing on the Washington Journal program hot off the heels of his Amazon bestseller , Hoax , Stelter was assailed over his network ’ s shaky credibility .
“ You guys always talk about how many times Trump has lied , ” the caller said .
“ I ’ ve calculated that , I think with your chyrons …Yeah , I don ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ left at CNN , but I know that if I were to estimate , about 300 different distortions , or misinformation that we get out of CNN — and you have to watch them in the airport , which is harsh — but , if you added all that up to 46 months , it comes out to be 300,000-plus distortions of truth.
” The man went on to recall the network ’ s skewed coverage of the Covington Catholic school fiasco , which led to one student settling multimillion-dollar lawsuits with CNN @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , my thing is , you guys — this is how low you ’ ll go… You went out , and you made lies , and you defamed a child.
” “ And I don ’ t believe in dividing our nation , it hurts our great nation , and so CNN is really the enemy of the truth .
That ’ s my opinion , thank you , ” the caller concluded .
Surprisingly , Stelter went on to acknowledge several media outlets are guilty of partisanship due to most journalists living @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is absolutely true that lots of journalists are based in New York and Washington [ D.C. ] , they ’ re based in big cities , they have liberal leanings , and mainstream newsrooms are built to make sure that that bias doesn ’ t seep into the news coverage .
And yet , sometimes it does .
I absolutely acknowledge that , ” Stelter said .
Another caller brought up a chyron featured on CNN last month which described Kenosha riots as “ fiery but mostly peaceful protests.
” “ We all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” the caller bluntly told Stelter , also referring to him as “ Humpty Dumpty ” and “ nothing but a stooge , ” before the call was dropped .
Stelter proceeded to blame the “ mistake ” on a novice producer .
“ I think that CNN banner the caller mentioned that said there were ‘ fiery but mostly peaceful protests , ’ that banner was probably a mistake .
I don ’ t know who wrote it , probably a young producer who ’ s trying their best under deadline in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ claimed .
“ That kind of thing becomes easily criticized and probably not the right banner to put on the screen , ”

C-SPAN callers dunked on CNN’s Brian Stelter Tuesday, roasting the Reliable Sources host over his network’s blatant anti-Trump bias and its disingenuous coverage of the riots in Kenosha, Wisconsin.
Appearing on the Washington Journal program hot off the heels of his Amazon bestseller, Hoax, Stelter was assailed over his network’s shaky credibility.
“You guys always talk about how many times Trump has lied,” the caller said. “I’ve calculated that, I think with your chyrons …Yeah, I don’t know if there’s any journalists left at CNN, but I know that if I were to estimate, about 300 different distortions, or misinformation that we get out of CNN — and you have to watch them in the airport, which is harsh — but, if you added all that up to 46 months, it comes out to be 300,000-plus distortions of truth.”
The man went on to recall the network’s skewed coverage of the Covington Catholic school fiasco, which led to one student settling multimillion-dollar lawsuits with CNN and other media outlets.
“So, my thing is, you guys — this is how low you’ll go… You went out, and you made lies, and you defamed a child.”
“And I don’t believe in dividing our nation, it hurts our great nation, and so CNN is really the enemy of the truth. That’s my opinion, thank you,” the caller concluded.
Surprisingly, Stelter went on to acknowledge several media outlets are guilty of partisanship due to most journalists living in liberal-leaning major cities.
“It is absolutely true that lots of journalists are based in New York and Washington [D.C.], they’re based in big cities, they have liberal leanings, and mainstream newsrooms are built to make sure that that bias doesn’t seep into the news coverage. And yet, sometimes it does. I absolutely acknowledge that,” Stelter said.
Another caller brought up a chyron featured on CNN last month which described Kenosha riots as “fiery but mostly peaceful protests.”
“We all know you’re not reliable,” the caller bluntly told Stelter, also referring to him as “Humpty Dumpty” and “nothing but a stooge,” before the call was dropped.
Stelter proceeded to blame the “mistake” on a novice producer.
“I think that CNN banner the caller mentioned that said there were ‘fiery but mostly peaceful protests,’ that banner was probably a mistake. I don’t know who wrote it, probably a young producer who’s trying their best under deadline in a breaking news situation,” he claimed. “That kind of thing becomes easily criticized and probably not the right banner to put on the screen,”
Follow the author on Gab: https://gab.ai/adansalazar
On Twitter: Follow @AdanSalazarWins
On Parler: https://parler.com/profile/adansalazar/
On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/adan.salazar.735
On Minds: https://www.minds.com/adan_infowars


newswars--2020-09-02--NFL QB Kirk Cousins On COVID and Masks: “If I Die, I Die”

Minnesota Vikings quarterback Kirk Cousins let the world know he ’ s not afraid of COVID-19 during an interview with the “ Ringer ” podcast on Wednesday .
The show ’ s host Kyle Brandt asked Cousins , “ If 1 is the person who says , ‘ Masks are stupid , you ’ re all a bunch of lemmings ’ and 10 is , ‘ I ’ m not leaving my master bathroom for the next 10 years , ’ where do you land ?
” Not shy in expressing his opinion , the QB responded , “ I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stupid , for the trouble it could get me in .
But I ’ m about a .000001.
” “ I want to respect what other people ’ s concerns are , ” he said .
“ For me personally , if you ’ re just talking ‘ no one else can get the virus , what is your concern if you could get it , ’ I would say , ‘ I ’ m gon na go about my daily life .
If I get it , I ’ m gon na @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gon na let nature do its course.
’ Survival-of-the-fittest kind of approach .
And just say , ‘ if it knocks me out , it knocks me out .
I ’ m going to be OK. ’ You know , even if I die .
If I die , I die .
I kind of have peace about that.
” Continuing , Cousins explained , “ So that ’ s really where I fall on it , so my opinion on wearing a mask is really about being respectful to other people .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ my own personal thoughts.
” Basically , Cousins said he does wear a mask , but only out of respect for others and not because he believes they work .
The NFL ’ s latest coronavirus testing data shows extremely low infection rates in what is be good news for the league and should have the public asking why their numbers are higher .
The answer is likely the fact that false positives aren ’ t being caught in the general population like the NFL is now doing after a lab sent back @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ago .
Between August 21-29 , the league administered 58,621 tests 8,739 players and personnel resulting in only 10 positive cases .

Minnesota Vikings quarterback Kirk Cousins let the world know he’s not afraid of COVID-19 during an interview with the “Ringer” podcast on Wednesday.
The show’s host Kyle Brandt asked Cousins, “If 1 is the person who says, ‘Masks are stupid, you’re all a bunch of lemmings’ and 10 is, ‘I’m not leaving my master bathroom for the next 10 years,’ where do you land?”
Not shy in expressing his opinion, the QB responded, “I’m not going to call anybody stupid, for the trouble it could get me in. But I’m about a .000001.”
“Really! How come?” Brandt asked Kirk.
“I want to respect what other people’s concerns are,” he said. “For me personally, if you’re just talking ‘no one else can get the virus, what is your concern if you could get it,’ I would say, ‘I’m gonna go about my daily life. If I get it, I’m gonna ride it out. I’m gonna let nature do its course.’ Survival-of-the-fittest kind of approach. And just say, ‘if it knocks me out, it knocks me out. I’m going to be OK.’ You know, even if I die. If I die, I die. I kind of have peace about that.”
Continuing, Cousins explained, “So that’s really where I fall on it, so my opinion on wearing a mask is really about being respectful to other people. It really has nothing to do with my own personal thoughts.”
Basically, Cousins said he does wear a mask, but only out of respect for others and not because he believes they work.
The NFL’s latest coronavirus testing data shows extremely low infection rates in what is be good news for the league and should have the public asking why their numbers are higher.
The answer is likely the fact that false positives aren’t being caught in the general population like the NFL is now doing after a lab sent back 100% false positives a few weeks ago.
Between August 21-29, the league administered 58,621 tests 8,739 players and personnel resulting in only 10 positive cases.
These stats reveal a positive rate of 0.017 percent.
Latest COVID-19 testing numbers from the NFL and NFLPA show 10 confirmed positive tests, including four among players, out of 58,621 administered from Aug. 21-29. pic.twitter.com/1AhDPBPtDl — Tom Pelissero (@TomPelissero) September 1, 2020
America, it’s time to return to pre-COVID life.


newswars--2020-09-02--Sound Money Is Key to Defending Our Liberties

The title of this article epitomizes what the Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises ( 1881–1973 ) called the “ sound money principle.
” As Mises put it : The sound-money principle has two aspects .
It is affirmative in approving the market ’ s choice of a commonly used medium of exchange .
It is negative in obstructing the government ’ s propensity to meddle with the currency system .
It is impossible to grasp the meaning of the idea of sound money if one does not realise that it was devised as an instrument for the protection of civil @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of governments .
Ideologically it belongs in the same class with political constitutions and bills of right .
Mises tells us that sound money is an indispensable line of defense of people ’ s liberties against the encroachment on the part of the state and that sound money is a kind of money that is not dictated by the state but is chosen by the people in the free marketplace .
The world we find ourselves in is a rather different place .
Our monies—be it the US dollar , the euro , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or the Swiss franc—represent fiat currencies , monopolized by the state .
Fiat money is economically and socially destructive—with far-reaching and seriously harmful economic and societal consequences , effects that extend beyond what most people would imagine .
Fiat money is inflationary ; it benefits a few at the expense of many others ; it causes boom-and-bust cycles ; it leads to overindebtedness ; it corrupts society ’ s morals ; and it paves the way toward the almighty , all-powerful state , toward tyranny .
It is certainly no coincidence that “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ since the world adopted an unfettered fiat money regime back in the early 1970s , and that as a result individual liberties and freedoms have been under pressure ever since .
The state feeds itself on fiat money .
It simply issues new debt , which is then monetized by the its central bank , which is at the heart of the fiat money regime .
Perhaps you will find it surprising that I believe that the concept of central banking is truly a Marxist concept .
( I am not saying that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Not at all !
There are also many other ideologies which approve of central banking . )
In their Communist Manifesto of 1848 , Karl Marx ( 1818–83 ) and Friedrich Engels ( 1820–95 ) compiled a list of measures necessary to establish communism .
Measure number 5 reads as follows : Against this backdrop there should be no doubt that once the state has become the absolute ruler of fiat money , the door is open for it to grow bigger and bigger , eventually turning into the dreaded deep state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we know well from history , has little regard for individual freedoms and liberties .
What needs to be done ?
Well , the challenge at hand is “ Making Money Great Again ” !
This requires , first and foremost , ending the state ’ s money production monopoly and opening up a free market in money .
A free market in money means that people have the freedom to choose the kind of money they wish to use and that people have the freedom to provide their fellow men with alternative @ @ @ @ @ @ @ money .
As things stand , however , a final solution to the “ money problem ” has not arrived yet—even considering the emergence of the cryptocurrency space .
This is because the financial intermediation problem is still unsolved in the cryptocurrency ecosystem ; we will come back to this issue in a moment .
But first let us address the question : How can we get from a state-controlled fiat money regime to a free market in money ?
The first strategy is monetary enlightenment—informing the widest possible audience about the evils @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their personal lives , families , and communities .
This also includes explaining to people that there is a superior and practicable alternative to a fiat money regime , namely a free market in money .
The second strategy is making progress in the field of alternative currencies and payment systems , especially in terms of technological disruptions and their economic profitability .
This is the activity space for those among us who are propelled by entrepreneurial spirit .
The cryptocurrency community , the bitcoin community in particular , and also precious metals–based @ @ @ @ @ @ @ headway in this area in recent years , but unfortunately victory has not yet been achieved .
For instance , bitcoin still has some scalability and performance issues .
Currently , the bitcoin network settles a peak of around 350,000 transactions worldwide every day , and given its present configuration , it is presumably running at almost full capacity .
By comparison , the German fiat money payment system alone processes more than 75 million transactions on average every business day .
From the payment processing viewpoint , bitcoin can not outshine fiat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a currency in a modern economy must provide for the possibility of financial intermediation ( an issue I mentioned earlier ) .
People typically demand payment or storage services for their money , or they want to lend and borrow money—irrespective of the kind of money they actually use .
Often peer-to-peer is not enough , a third party is required .
Providing intermediation services outside existing state regulation is difficult .
In fact , it would put an upper limit on the financial sophistication of any cryptocurrency .
This is a heavy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ currencies .
And if a cryptocurrency comes out into the open space , it will have the state breathing down its neck , drowning it in business-destroying regulations and restrictions .
Because the financial intermediation problem is still unsolved , one has reason to remain skeptical that—given the current circumstances—existing cryptocurrencies will succeed in pushing aside the state and replacing its fiat currency just like that .
Precious metals suffer from similar problems .
In many countries , the state subjects gold and silver to value-added taxes and/or capital gains taxes .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ terms of using them in daily transactions .
The Key to Free Market Money Is Deconstructing the State In fact , is it possible that a free market in money can ever emerge as long as there is the kind of state we know today ?
The state is , as most of you probably know , the territorial monopolist of ultimate decision-making with the right to tax its citizens .
We can rightfully expect that this kind of state will do its best to crush any competitor to its fiat money and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ emerging .
So if we want a free market in money , the sobering logical conclusion is this : we need to reform , to deconstruct , the state ( as we know it today ) .
Now the uncomfortable truth is out , because the state is possibly the fiercest adversary you could choose .
How can we hope to achieve victory ?
Well , there is certainly no magic spell .
One possible and straightforward strategy might be appealing to people ’ s inner self , and that is their right @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is inalienable and it is an indisputable truth .
Each and every individual is the owner of his or her body and the owner of goods acquired in nonaggressive ways ( without violating the physical integrity of someone else ’ s property ) .
We can not dispute these words without causing a logical contradiction .
The right to self-determination implies that the citizens of a state have the right ( 1 ) to make it known , by a freely conducted plebiscite , that they no longer wish to be members of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ form an independent state or to attach themselves to some other state .
In other words : the right to self-determination includes the right of secession , that is , people ’ s right to break up the big state and to deconstruct it into smaller units .
Smaller political units are less powerful , more peaceful , and free market oriented .
They keep taxation low , or may even go without it and become wealthier .
Just think of , e.g.
, Shanghai , Hong Kong , Switzerland , Liechtenstein , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ political units must compete for capital and talents with other political units .
They must behave themselves nicely .
Otherwise , people and capital will leave their territory .
Given a great number of small political units , there is a good chance that some of them will allow for , even encourage , a free market in money , setting an example that creates emulators .
It is hard to say which route would be the most effective in “ Making Money Great Again.
” Perhaps the cryptocurrency community will somehow succeed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ know it today ) , leaving a truly free market in money in its place .
In the meantime , however , it certainly would not hurt if we ( 1 ) kept educating the wider audience about what good money is and what bad money is and also ( 2 ) kept unmasking the state ( as we know it today ) , showing that it is incompatible with and a violation of the inalienable right to self-determination of each and every human being .
In any case , it is of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ monopoly out of the hands of the state .
Otherwise , there is indeed little hope that the free society ( or what little is left of it ) can survive .

The title of this article epitomizes what the Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises (1881–1973) called the “sound money principle.” As Mises put it:
The sound-money principle has two aspects. It is affirmative in approving the market’s choice of a commonly used medium of exchange. It is negative in obstructing the government’s propensity to meddle with the currency system.
And further:
It is impossible to grasp the meaning of the idea of sound money if one does not realise that it was devised as an instrument for the protection of civil liberties against despotic inroads on the part of governments. Ideologically it belongs in the same class with political constitutions and bills of right.
Mises tells us that sound money is an indispensable line of defense of people’s liberties against the encroachment on the part of the state and that sound money is a kind of money that is not dictated by the state but is chosen by the people in the free marketplace. The world we find ourselves in is a rather different place. Our monies—be it the US dollar, the euro, the Chinese renminbi, the yen, or the Swiss franc—represent fiat currencies, monopolized by the state.
Fiat money is economically and socially destructive—with far-reaching and seriously harmful economic and societal consequences, effects that extend beyond what most people would imagine. Fiat money is inflationary; it benefits a few at the expense of many others; it causes boom-and-bust cycles; it leads to overindebtedness; it corrupts society’s morals; and it paves the way toward the almighty, all-powerful state, toward tyranny.
Central Banking Is Marxist
It is certainly no coincidence that “the state” has been expanding ever since the world adopted an unfettered fiat money regime back in the early 1970s, and that as a result individual liberties and freedoms have been under pressure ever since. The state feeds itself on fiat money. It simply issues new debt, which is then monetized by the its central bank, which is at the heart of the fiat money regime.
Perhaps you will find it surprising that I believe that the concept of central banking is truly a Marxist concept. (I am not saying that central banking is only favored by Marxists. Not at all! There are also many other ideologies which approve of central banking.)
In their Communist Manifesto of 1848, Karl Marx (1818–83) and Friedrich Engels (1820–95) compiled a list of measures necessary to establish communism. Measure number 5 reads as follows:
a
Against this backdrop there should be no doubt that once the state has become the absolute ruler of fiat money, the door is open for it to grow bigger and bigger, eventually turning into the dreaded deep state. And the deep state, as we know well from history, has little regard for individual freedoms and liberties.
Making Money Great Again: Returning to Sound Money
What needs to be done? Well, the challenge at hand is “Making Money Great Again”! This requires, first and foremost, ending the state’s money production monopoly and opening up a free market in money. A free market in money means that people have the freedom to choose the kind of money they wish to use and that people have the freedom to provide their fellow men with alternative goods that may serve them well as money.
As things stand, however, a final solution to the “money problem” has not arrived yet—even considering the emergence of the cryptocurrency space. This is because the financial intermediation problem is still unsolved in the cryptocurrency ecosystem; we will come back to this issue in a moment.
But first let us address the question: How can we get from a state-controlled fiat money regime to a free market in money?
The first strategy is monetary enlightenment—informing the widest possible audience about the evils of fiat money and how it affects their personal lives, families, and communities. This also includes explaining to people that there is a superior and practicable alternative to a fiat money regime, namely a free market in money.
The second strategy is making progress in the field of alternative currencies and payment systems, especially in terms of technological disruptions and their economic profitability. This is the activity space for those among us who are propelled by entrepreneurial spirit.
The Limits of Cryptocurrency
The cryptocurrency community, the bitcoin community in particular, and also precious metals–based payment system providers have been making some headway in this area in recent years, but unfortunately victory has not yet been achieved.
For instance, bitcoin still has some scalability and performance issues. Currently, the bitcoin network settles a peak of around 350,000 transactions worldwide every day, and given its present configuration, it is presumably running at almost full capacity. By comparison, the German fiat money payment system alone processes more than 75 million transactions on average every business day. From the payment processing viewpoint, bitcoin cannot outshine fiat currencies yet.
What is more, a currency in a modern economy must provide for the possibility of financial intermediation (an issue I mentioned earlier). People typically demand payment or storage services for their money, or they want to lend and borrow money—irrespective of the kind of money they actually use. Often peer-to-peer is not enough, a third party is required.
Providing intermediation services outside existing state regulation is difficult. In fact, it would put an upper limit on the financial sophistication of any cryptocurrency. This is a heavy drag on their competitiveness compared to fiat currencies. And if a cryptocurrency comes out into the open space, it will have the state breathing down its neck, drowning it in business-destroying regulations and restrictions. Because the financial intermediation problem is still unsolved, one has reason to remain skeptical that—given the current circumstances—existing cryptocurrencies will succeed in pushing aside the state and replacing its fiat currency just like that.
Precious metals suffer from similar problems. In many countries, the state subjects gold and silver to value-added taxes and/or capital gains taxes. This makes them uncompetitive versus fiat currencies in terms of using them in daily transactions.
The Key to Free Market Money Is Deconstructing the State
In fact, is it possible that a free market in money can ever emerge as long as there is the kind of state we know today? The state is, as most of you probably know, the territorial monopolist of ultimate decision-making with the right to tax its citizens. We can rightfully expect that this kind of state will do its best to crush any competitor to its fiat money and prevent a free market in money from emerging.
So if we want a free market in money, the sobering logical conclusion is this: we need to reform, to deconstruct, the state (as we know it today).
Now the uncomfortable truth is out, because the state is possibly the fiercest adversary you could choose. How can we hope to achieve victory?
Well, there is certainly no magic spell. One possible and straightforward strategy might be appealing to people’s inner self, and that is their right to self-determination.
The right to self-determination is inalienable and it is an indisputable truth. Each and every individual is the owner of his or her body and the owner of goods acquired in nonaggressive ways (without violating the physical integrity of someone else’s property). We cannot dispute these words without causing a logical contradiction.
The right to self-determination implies that the citizens of a state have the right (1) to make it known, by a freely conducted plebiscite, that they no longer wish to be members of the state and (2) to form an independent state or to attach themselves to some other state. In other words: the right to self-determination includes the right of secession, that is, people’s right to break up the big state and to deconstruct it into smaller units.
Smaller political units are less powerful, more peaceful, and free market oriented. They keep taxation low, or may even go without it and become wealthier. Just think of, e.g., Shanghai, Hong Kong, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, or Monaco. This is because small political units must compete for capital and talents with other political units. They must behave themselves nicely. Otherwise, people and capital will leave their territory. Given a great number of small political units, there is a good chance that some of them will allow for, even encourage, a free market in money, setting an example that creates emulators.
Conclusion
It is hard to say which route would be the most effective in “Making Money Great Again.”
Perhaps the cryptocurrency community will somehow succeed in ending the state (as we know it today), leaving a truly free market in money in its place.
In the meantime, however, it certainly would not hurt if we (1) kept educating the wider audience about what good money is and what bad money is and also (2) kept unmasking the state (as we know it today), showing that it is incompatible with and a violation of the inalienable right to self-determination of each and every human being.
In any case, it is of the utmost importance to wrest the money monopoly out of the hands of the state. Otherwise, there is indeed little hope that the free society (or what little is left of it) can survive.


newswars--2020-09-02--As Kenosha and Minneapolis Burn, Millions of Americans Buy Guns

It ’ s increasingly clear to even the average American that if riots come to your neighborhood , you ’ re on your own .
The message received is increasingly be this : if your plan is to wait until the police show up to provide “ protection , ” be prepared to wait a long time .
Consequently , as violence appears to surge in America ’ s cities , millions of Americans have become first-time gun owners .
There are two trends at work which are making Americans doubt that government law enforcement is reliable and effective .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ is witnessing nightly displays of looting , rioting , and general civil unrest .
At the same time , many police officers don ’ t appear particularly able or willing to defend the public against looters and rioters .
Homicide rates in New York , for example , have surged among accusations of a “ police slowdown.
” A number of police departments ( including those in Los Angeles and Atlanta ) are rumored to be using strategies such as the “ blue flu ” in which police personnel pretend to be ill @ @ @ @ @ @ @ favors from lawmakers .
But even when police personnel are able , there are not enough of them in most cases to truly address the ongoing nightly violence in many cities .
And in some cases , elected officials , like in Portland and Chicago , appear uninterested in confronting rioters with much enthusiasm at all .
It easy to see how ordinary Americans could look on current events with increasing alarm .
On August 29 , a man was allegedly murdered by at least one protestor among the many who have been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Portland for more than three months .
Two weeks ago , a truck driver sustained serious injuries , also in Portland , when he was attacked by a group of “ protestors ” while reportedly attempting to help a woman who was being robbed .
Last week in Kenosha , protestors were seen attacking a teenager who had been attempting to protect businesses from looting and vandalism .
The teen reportedly opened fire in self-defense .
In Washington , DC , a mob threatened restaurant patrons , and in Minneapolis , dozens of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But even before the current rash of arson , looting , and violence , the police response to serious crime was never terribly impressive .
For violent crimes , studies have shown police may take up to an hour to respond more than one-third of the time .
( This summer , response times fo rthe NYPD are up by four minutes compared to last year . )
And if one survives an attack from violent criminals , one shouldn ’ t assume justice will be done .
Fewer than half of violent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the United States .
According to new estimates from the National Shooting Sports Foundation ( NSSF ) , using the FBI ’ s National Instant Background Check System ( NICS ) , “ there were over 12 million guns bought in the first seven months of 2020—up more than 70 percent over the same time span in 2019 .
This number is likely to include nearly 5 million first-time gun owners so far this year.
” Moreover , as noted in an unsigned editorial at the Wall Street Journal , The FBI ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
They show that in July the bureau carried out 3.6 million background checks , the third highest month on record .
[ T ] his translates to 1.8 million gun sales for July 2020—a 122 % increase over July 2019 .
The 12,141,032 gun sales through this July is just shy of the 13,199,172 sales for all of 2019 .
Gun retailers saw a 95 percent increase in firearm sales and a 139 percent increase in ammunition sales in the first six months of this year compared with the same period in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that life for the average American is much more dangerous this year than it has been over the past five years .
After all , in 2014 , the homicide rate in America hit a 51-year low .
But the American public has never been one to sit back and conclude everything is fine just because homicides are relatively low .
After all , gun purchases were already surging even before the apparent killing of George Floyd touched off a wave of protests followed by riots and looting .
Gun purchases that had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over the covid-19 panic soon became gun purchases fueled by far more immediate fears of violent crime .
Also notable is that many new gun owners are outside of groups known as the usual suspects when it comes to gun purchases .
The NSSF reported that 58 percent of the new firearms purchases were by black men and women , while “ women comprised 40 % of first-time gun buyers.
” Needless to say , these trends are going very much against the grain of the usual narrative employed by gun control advocates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ main tenets we ’ ve seen many times .
They include : • Government police agencies provide better protection than a private firearm ever could .
• If you ’ re in danger , it ’ s best to call 911 and then wait .
• If you buy a gun , the gun is more likely to kill someone you love than to stop a criminal .
• America would be safer if fewer people had guns .
• People who buy guns are mostly just right-wing hayseeds .
Hillary Clinton calls @ @ @ @ @ @ @ opponents of private gun ownership rarely say this explicitly , the sum total of their narrative is this : only police and military personnel should own guns .
The basic idea here is that private gun owners can not be trusted , and that government officials will keep us safe .
But as so often occurs when there are riots—as happened in Ferguson ( in 2014 ) and as is happening in Kenosha police officers and other government “ public safety ” personnel mostly just protect government property .
The private sector must @ @ @ @ @ @ @ appear to have gotten the message .

It’s increasingly clear to even the average American that if riots come to your neighborhood, you’re on your own.
The message received is increasingly be this: if your plan is to wait until the police show up to provide “protection,” be prepared to wait a long time. Consequently, as violence appears to surge in America’s cities, millions of Americans have become first-time gun owners.
Government Officials Aren’t Keeping Us “Safe”
There are two trends at work which are making Americans doubt that government law enforcement is reliable and effective.
On the one hand, the public is witnessing nightly displays of looting, rioting, and general civil unrest. At the same time, many police officers don’t appear particularly able or willing to defend the public against looters and rioters. Homicide rates in New York, for example, have surged among accusations of a “police slowdown.” A number of police departments (including those in Los Angeles and Atlanta) are rumored to be using strategies such as the “blue flu” in which police personnel pretend to be ill as a negotiating tactic for obtaining political favors from lawmakers. But even when police personnel are able, there are not enough of them in most cases to truly address the ongoing nightly violence in many cities. And in some cases, elected officials, like in Portland and Chicago, appear uninterested in confronting rioters with much enthusiasm at all.
It easy to see how ordinary Americans could look on current events with increasing alarm. On August 29, a man was allegedly murdered by at least one protestor among the many who have been protesting, rioting, and looting in Portland for more than three months. Two weeks ago, a truck driver sustained serious injuries, also in Portland, when he was attacked by a group of “protestors” while reportedly attempting to help a woman who was being robbed. Last week in Kenosha, protestors were seen attacking a teenager who had been attempting to protect businesses from looting and vandalism. The teen reportedly opened fire in self-defense. In Washington, DC, a mob threatened restaurant patrons, and in Minneapolis, dozens of businesses have been burned and looted.
But even before the current rash of arson, looting, and violence, the police response to serious crime was never terribly impressive. For violent crimes, studies have shown police may take up to an hour to respond more than one-third of the time. (This summer, response times fo rthe NYPD are up by four minutes compared to last year.) And if one survives an attack from violent criminals, one shouldn’t assume justice will be done. Fewer than half of violent crimes are ever “solved” in the United States.
Gun Purchases Are Growing
Meanwhile, gun purchases have surged.
According to new estimates from the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), using the FBI’s National Instant Background Check System (NICS), “there were over 12 million guns bought in the first seven months of 2020—up more than 70 percent over the same time span in 2019. This number is likely to include nearly 5 million first-time gun owners so far this year.”
Moreover, as noted in an unsigned editorial at the Wall Street Journal,
The FBI’s most recent gun-sale figures are stunning. They show that in July the bureau carried out 3.6 million background checks, the third highest month on record. [T]his translates to 1.8 million gun sales for July 2020—a 122% increase over July 2019. The 12,141,032 gun sales through this July is just shy of the 13,199,172 sales for all of 2019.
Gun retailers saw a 95 percent increase in firearm sales and a 139 percent increase in ammunition sales in the first six months of this year compared with the same period in 2019.
Statistically, it remains unclear that life for the average American is much more dangerous this year than it has been over the past five years. After all, in 2014, the homicide rate in America hit a 51-year low. But the American public has never been one to sit back and conclude everything is fine just because homicides are relatively low.
After all, gun purchases were already surging even before the apparent killing of George Floyd touched off a wave of protests followed by riots and looting. Gun purchases that had been fueled by general uncertainty and anxiety over the covid-19 panic soon became gun purchases fueled by far more immediate fears of violent crime.
Also notable is that many new gun owners are outside of groups known as the usual suspects when it comes to gun purchases. The NSSF reported that 58 percent of the new firearms purchases were by black men and women, while “women comprised 40% of first-time gun buyers.”
Millions Aren’t Buying the Usual Gun Control Claims
Needless to say, these trends are going very much against the grain of the usual narrative employed by gun control advocates, a narrative that generally employs several main tenets we’ve seen many times. They include:
Government police agencies provide better protection than a private firearm ever could.
If you’re in danger, it’s best to call 911 and then wait.
If you buy a gun, the gun is more likely to kill someone you love than to stop a criminal.
America would be safer if fewer people had guns.
People who buy guns are mostly just right-wing hayseeds. Hillary Clinton calls these people “deplorables.”
And while opponents of private gun ownership rarely say this explicitly, the sum total of their narrative is this: only police and military personnel should own guns. The basic idea here is that private gun owners cannot be trusted, and that government officials will keep us safe. But as so often occurs when there are riots—as happened in Ferguson (in 2014) and as is happening in Kenosha police officers and other government “public safety” personnel mostly just protect government property. The private sector must just fend for itself.
Many Americans appear to have gotten the message.


newswars--2020-09-02--The Fed Now Wants Even More Inflation. The Old “2 Percent Target” Wasn’t Enough

The US Federal Reserve has adjusted its official inflation target to be even more flexible and inflationary .
The Fed has always been more inflationary than the Bundesbank and its successor , the European Central Bank , at least on paper .
The primary objective of the ECB is price stability , following the Bundesbank legacy .
Curiously , the ECB considers price stability to be given if price inflation is below , but close to , 2 percent .
Only when this goal is achieved does the ECB aim to support other economic policies , such as full employment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ look somewhat different .
The Federal Reserve pursues three equally important goals .
In addition to price stability , the Fed also wants to ensure moderate long-term interest rates and maximum employment .
Therefore , a little more inflation to increase employment in the short term is easier to justify with the Fed ’ s mandate than with that of the ECB .
Moreover , the Fed has explicitly set its price inflation target at 2 percent since 2012 , which means that it is inherently more inflationary than the ECB with its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to , 2 percent .
With its recent change in strategy the Fed is going one step further .
It now wants to accept and target price inflation rates of over 2 percent if the previous measured rate was below 2 percent .
It is now aiming at an “ average inflation target.
” If , for example , the measured inflation rate is 1 percent for three years , then the Fed has no problem with an inflation rate of 5 percent , to make up the “ shortfall.
” Since the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ below 2 percent in recent years , the Federal Reserve is opening the door to higher monetary inflation .
The policy change has further increased the discretionary power in interpreting the Fed ’ s price stability target .
Considering that price stability literally means and is 0 percent price inflation , we have gone a long way down an Orwellian road .
It ’ s important to realize that with this strategy adjustment the Fed simply legitimizes the path of higher money supply growth that it has embarked on and wants to continue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fed was forced to make this adjustment to remain true to its inflation course .
When the mandate is in the way , the mandate has to change .
Therefore , the change in strategy does not come as a surprise but is the logical result of the Fed ’ s intention to continue to bail out an overindebted economy and finance the government .
This year , the ECB will also review its strategies and possibly adjust them , i.e .
make them more inflationary , thereby also consolidating and subsequently justifying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Although the strategy adjustment was to be expected , its symbolic power and long-term effects should not be underestimated .
The quality of the dollar has declined .
Price inflation can be expected to be higher than otherwise .
This gives the stock markets further upward momentum .
The euro is becoming more attractive relative to the dollar , at least until a strategy adjustment has also taken place in the eurozone .
The most important insight of the Fed ’ s more flexible objective is that central banks do not care for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ They are in a symbiosis with their overindebted economies and the governments they finance .
In the current situation , central banks have to maintain interest rates low and accelerate the printing press to keep debtors afloat .
They have already ventured too far down the inflation path .
The move to adjust their strategy becomes allowing for more discretion , and inflation is almost inevitable .
Unsurprisingly and as illustrated by the recent Fed ’ s policy adjustment , central banks do not hesitate to change their objectives if they regard it @ @ @

The US Federal Reserve has adjusted its official inflation target to be even more flexible and inflationary.
The Fed has always been more inflationary than the Bundesbank and its successor, the European Central Bank, at least on paper. The primary objective of the ECB is price stability, following the Bundesbank legacy. Curiously, the ECB considers price stability to be given if price inflation is below, but close to, 2 percent. Only when this goal is achieved does the ECB aim to support other economic policies, such as full employment.
In the USA, the preferences look somewhat different. The Federal Reserve pursues three equally important goals. In addition to price stability, the Fed also wants to ensure moderate long-term interest rates and maximum employment. Therefore, a little more inflation to increase employment in the short term is easier to justify with the Fed’s mandate than with that of the ECB. Moreover, the Fed has explicitly set its price inflation target at 2 percent since 2012, which means that it is inherently more inflationary than the ECB with its target rate of under, but close to, 2 percent.
With its recent change in strategy the Fed is going one step further. It now wants to accept and target price inflation rates of over 2 percent if the previous measured rate was below 2 percent. It is now aiming at an “average inflation target.” If, for example, the measured inflation rate is 1 percent for three years, then the Fed has no problem with an inflation rate of 5 percent, to make up the “shortfall.”
Since the US price inflation rate has mostly been below 2 percent in recent years, the Federal Reserve is opening the door to higher monetary inflation. The policy change has further increased the discretionary power in interpreting the Fed’s price stability target. Considering that price stability literally means and is 0 percent price inflation, we have gone a long way down an Orwellian road.
It’s important to realize that with this strategy adjustment the Fed simply legitimizes the path of higher money supply growth that it has embarked on and wants to continue on. In other words, the Fed was forced to make this adjustment to remain true to its inflation course. When the mandate is in the way, the mandate has to change. Therefore, the change in strategy does not come as a surprise but is the logical result of the Fed’s intention to continue to bail out an overindebted economy and finance the government. This year, the ECB will also review its strategies and possibly adjust them, i.e. make them more inflationary, thereby also consolidating and subsequently justifying the course it has already taken.
Although the strategy adjustment was to be expected, its symbolic power and long-term effects should not be underestimated. The quality of the dollar has declined. Price inflation can be expected to be higher than otherwise. This gives the stock markets further upward momentum. The euro is becoming more attractive relative to the dollar, at least until a strategy adjustment has also taken place in the eurozone. The most important insight of the Fed’s more flexible objective is that central banks do not care for rules. They make the rules. They are in a symbiosis with their overindebted economies and the governments they finance. In the current situation, central banks have to maintain interest rates low and accelerate the printing press to keep debtors afloat. They have already ventured too far down the inflation path. The move to adjust their strategy becomes allowing for more discretion, and inflation is almost inevitable. Unsurprisingly and as illustrated by the recent Fed’s policy adjustment, central banks do not hesitate to change their objectives if they regard it as necessary.


newswars--2020-09-02--Handgrip Strength Shown to Identify People at High Risk of Type 2 Diabetes

A simple test such as the strength of your handgrip could be used as a quick , low-cost screening tool to help healthcare professionals identify patients at risk of type 2 diabetes .
In new research , scientists at the universities of Bristol and Eastern Finland measured the muscular handgrip strength of 776 men and women without a history of diabetes over a 20-year period and demonstrated that the risk of type 2 diabetes was reduced by around 50 per cent for every unit increase in handgrip strength value .
The findings are published today in Annals of Medicine .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ major cause of death in the world .
Around 90 per cent of people with diabetes have type 2 diabetes .
In the UK alone , one in ten people over 40 are now living with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes .
It is expected that if nothing changes , more than five million people will have developed diabetes by 2025 .
Though older age , obesity , family history and lifestyle factors such as physical inactivity , smoking , unhealthy diet and excessive alcohol contribute substantially to the risk of developing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do not explain all of the risk for type 2 diabetes .
It appears other factors may be involved .
Reduced muscular strength , which can be measured by handgrip strength , has consistently been linked to early death , cardiovascular disease , and disability .
Until recently , there was inconsistent evidence on the relationship between handgrip strength and type 2 diabetes .
In a recent literature review of ten published studies on the topic the same researchers demonstrated that people with higher values of handgrip strength had a 27 per cent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
However , while findings from this review suggested handgrip strength could potentially be used to predict type 2 diabetes , researchers needed to test this formally using individual patient data .
In this latest study , the researchers from Bristol Medical School and Eastern Finland ’ s Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition followed 776 men and women aged 60-72 years without a history of diabetes over a 20-year period and measured the power of their hand grip strength using a handgrip dynamometer .
Patients were asked to squeeze the handles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with maximum isometric effort and maintain this for five seconds .
An analysis of the results demonstrated that the risk of type 2 diabetes was reduced by about 50 per cent for every unit increase in handgrip strength value .
This association persisted even after taking into account several established factors that can affect type 2 diabetes such as age , family history of diabetes , physical activity , smoking , hypertension , waist circumference and fasting plasma glucose .
When information on handgrip strength was added to these established factors which are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the prediction of type 2 diabetes improved further .
According to lead author Dr Setor Kunutsor from Bristol ’ s Musculoskeletal Research Unit : “ These findings may have implications for the development of type 2 diabetes prevention strategies .
Assessment of handgrip is simple , inexpensive and does not require very skilled expertise and resources and could potentially be used in the early identification of individuals at high risk of future type 2 diabetes.
” Importantly , the findings appeared to be marked in women compared to men in sex-specific analyses @ @ @ @ @ @ @ benefit from the use of this potential screening tool .
Principal investigator , Professor Jari Laukkanen from the University of Eastern Finland , added : “ These results are based on a Finnish population .
Given the low number of events in our analyses , we propose larger studies to replicate these findings in other populations and specifically in men and women.
” The authors add that further research is needed to establish whether efforts to improve muscle strength such as resistance training are likely to reduce an individual ’ s risk of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ funded by the National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre ( NIHR Bristol BRC ) at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol and the Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research .
Alex Jones examines and reacts to an HBO/Axios gaslighting mind control piece on how Americans should not accept election day results and should wait until the Democrats count all their illegal ballots .

A simple test such as the strength of your handgrip could be used as a quick, low-cost screening tool to help healthcare professionals identify patients at risk of type 2 diabetes.
In new research, scientists at the universities of Bristol and Eastern Finland measured the muscular handgrip strength of 776 men and women without a history of diabetes over a 20-year period and demonstrated that the risk of type 2 diabetes was reduced by around 50 per cent for every unit increase in handgrip strength value.
The findings are published today in Annals of Medicine.
Diabetes in all forms is the ninth major cause of death in the world. Around 90 per cent of people with diabetes have type 2 diabetes. In the UK alone, one in ten people over 40 are now living with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. It is expected that if nothing changes, more than five million people will have developed diabetes by 2025.
Though older age, obesity, family history and lifestyle factors such as physical inactivity, smoking, unhealthy diet and excessive alcohol contribute substantially to the risk of developing type 2 diabetes, these factors alone do not explain all of the risk for type 2 diabetes. It appears other factors may be involved. Reduced muscular strength, which can be measured by handgrip strength, has consistently been linked to early death, cardiovascular disease, and disability.
Until recently, there was inconsistent evidence on the relationship between handgrip strength and type 2 diabetes. In a recent literature review of ten published studies on the topic the same researchers demonstrated that people with higher values of handgrip strength had a 27 per cent reduced risk of developing type 2 diabetes.
However, while findings from this review suggested handgrip strength could potentially be used to predict type 2 diabetes, researchers needed to test this formally using individual patient data. In this latest study, the researchers from Bristol Medical School and Eastern Finland’s Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition followed 776 men and women aged 60-72 years without a history of diabetes over a 20-year period and measured the power of their hand grip strength using a handgrip dynamometer. Patients were asked to squeeze the handles of the dynamometer with their dominant hand with maximum isometric effort and maintain this for five seconds.
An analysis of the results demonstrated that the risk of type 2 diabetes was reduced by about 50 per cent for every unit increase in handgrip strength value. This association persisted even after taking into account several established factors that can affect type 2 diabetes such as age, family history of diabetes, physical activity, smoking, hypertension, waist circumference and fasting plasma glucose. When information on handgrip strength was added to these established factors which are already known to predict type 2 diabetes, the prediction of type 2 diabetes improved further.
According to lead author Dr Setor Kunutsor from Bristol’s Musculoskeletal Research Unit: “These findings may have implications for the development of type 2 diabetes prevention strategies. Assessment of handgrip is simple, inexpensive and does not require very skilled expertise and resources and could potentially be used in the early identification of individuals at high risk of future type 2 diabetes.”
Importantly, the findings appeared to be marked in women compared to men in sex-specific analyses, suggesting that women are likely to benefit from the use of this potential screening tool.
Principal investigator, Professor Jari Laukkanen from the University of Eastern Finland, added: “These results are based on a Finnish population. Given the low number of events in our analyses, we propose larger studies to replicate these findings in other populations and specifically in men and women.” The authors add that further research is needed to establish whether efforts to improve muscle strength such as resistance training are likely to reduce an individual’s risk of type 2 diabetes.
The study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR Bristol BRC) at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol and the Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research.
Alex Jones examines and reacts to an HBO/Axios gaslighting mind control piece on how Americans should not accept election day results and should wait until the Democrats count all their illegal ballots.


newswars--2020-09-02--Air Travel Plummets, United Airlines to Slash Over 16,000 Jobs

United Airlines joined American Airlines in the latest round of massive job cuts as the virus pandemic continues to batter the travel and tourism industry .
United said , in an internal memo , seen by Fox Business , that it will furlough 16,370 workers on Oct. 1 .
This includes 2,850 pilots , 6,920 flight attendants , and 2,010 technicians .
The Chicago-based carrier has over 90,000 workers and initially warned in July that 36,000 jobs were at risk of being lost as a demand crisis in air travel persisted through summer .
“ The pandemic has drawn us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any expert predicted , and in an environment where travel demand is so depressed , United can not continue with staffing levels that significantly exceed the schedule we fly , ” the company memo to employees said .
“ Sadly , we don ’ t expect demand to return to anything resembling normal until there is a widely available treatment or vaccine.
” Airlines were infused with $ 25 billion in stimulus in March from the federal government to keep tens of thousands of workers employed through September .
With the bailout funds @ @ @ @ @ @ @ take a couple years , and some airlines warning that if more bailout money is not seen shortly , another round of massive layoffs could be seen .
President Trump has responded to the crisis earlier this week and said his adminstration will support struggling carriers .
“ We ’ ve got four executive actions that actually the president took , we ’ re going to take a few others , ” White House chief of staff Mark Meadows said last week .
“ Because if Congress is not going to work , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ work and solve some problems .
So hopefully , we can help out the airlines and keep some of those employees from being furloughed.
” In July , United ’ s CEO Scott Kirby said air travel won ’ t recover until there ’ s a proven vaccine for COVID-19 .
With no proven vaccine insight , just optimsic headlines from Trump to pump the stock market , Kirby had to defer all new aircraft deliveries due in 2022 .
The latest International Air Transport Association report in mid-August suggested that passenger demand @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2024 .
Alex Jones examines and reacts to an HBO/Axios gaslighting mind control piece on how Americans should not accept election day results and should wait until the Democrats count all their illegal ballots .

United Airlines joined American Airlines in the latest round of massive job cuts as the virus pandemic continues to batter the travel and tourism industry.
United said, in an internal memo, seen by Fox Business, that it will furlough 16,370 workers on Oct. 1. This includes 2,850 pilots, 6,920 flight attendants, and 2,010 technicians.
The Chicago-based carrier has over 90,000 workers and initially warned in July that 36,000 jobs were at risk of being lost as a demand crisis in air travel persisted through summer.
“The pandemic has drawn us in deeper and lasted longer than almost any expert predicted, and in an environment where travel demand is so depressed, United cannot continue with staffing levels that significantly exceed the schedule we fly,” the company memo to employees said. “Sadly, we don’t expect demand to return to anything resembling normal until there is a widely available treatment or vaccine.”
Airlines were infused with $25 billion in stimulus in March from the federal government to keep tens of thousands of workers employed through September. With the bailout funds depleted, air travel recovery that could take a couple years, and some airlines warning that if more bailout money is not seen shortly, another round of massive layoffs could be seen. President Trump has responded to the crisis earlier this week and said his adminstration will support struggling carriers.
“We’ve got four executive actions that actually the president took, we’re going to take a few others,” White House chief of staff Mark Meadows said last week. “Because if Congress is not going to work, this president is going to get to work and solve some problems. So hopefully, we can help out the airlines and keep some of those employees from being furloughed.”
In July, United’s CEO Scott Kirby said air travel won’t recover until there’s a proven vaccine for COVID-19. With no proven vaccine insight, just optimsic headlines from Trump to pump the stock market, Kirby had to defer all new aircraft deliveries due in 2022.
The latest International Air Transport Association report in mid-August suggested that passenger demand might not return to 2019 levels until 2024.
Alex Jones examines and reacts to an HBO/Axios gaslighting mind control piece on how Americans should not accept election day results and should wait until the Democrats count all their illegal ballots.


newswars--2020-09-02--Study: Bilingual Children Lose Less Brain Matter as They Grow Up

Children and adolescents who speak more than one language may reach adulthood with more grey matter , according to a new study .
In a paper published in Brain Structure and Function , an international team of academics led by the University of Reading and Georgetown University looked at detailed scans of children ’ s and adolescents ’ brains and found that bilingual participants had potential advantages of both grey and white matter than similarly-aged children who spoke only one language .
While bilingualism has previously been shown to positively affect brain structure and cognitive performance in adults , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ date showing that the effect of speaking more than one language may have similar impacts on developing brains .
Dr Christos Pliatsikas , the leader of the project and an Associate Professor of Psycholinguistics in Bi and Multilinguals at the University of Reading said : “ Grey matter in the brain decreases from an early age , but our study found that key brain areas showed less such shrinkage in bilinguals than monolinguals during development.
” “ In previous studies , we ’ ve already seen that bilingualism has a positive effect on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but this is the first time we ’ ve seen strong evidence for these effects in children and adolescents as well.
” Dr Michael Ullman , senior author on the paper and Professor of Neuroscience at Georgetown University Medical Center , said : “ It may be the case that the effects on the brain that we have seen in adult bilinguals have their roots in childhood .
We will be looking more at this in future studies.
” The brain scans showed that the loss in grey matter that children and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in bilinguals than those who only spoke one language .
Grey matter refers to the portions of the brain where the bodies of brain cells are found , such as around the surface of the brain ( called the cortex ) .
White matter refers to parts of the brain containing the connections between brain cells , allowing them to communicate ( the connections are white because they are insulated with fat ) .
The study found that that the bilinguals kept more grey matter during brain development , and also increased white @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In both cases the effects were found mainly in brain areas linked to language learning and use .
“ This is an important study for two reasons .
The first is that by looking at the brains of children and adolescents , we can start to see how and when bilingualism has an effect on the brain during language development .
While we ’ ve previously looked at differences between bilingual and monolingual adult brains at static points , here we see the effect of bilingualism on the brain as we develop.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ bilingualism on grey and white matter may have a number of wider benefits for language and cognitive function , such as performance in tasks related to attention and executive control , which have been suggested to be enhanced in older bilinguals .
Overall , the findings indicate that encouraging bilingualism in childhood may have benefits later in life.
” Alex Jones examines and reacts to an HBO/Axios gaslighting mind control piece on how Americans should not accept election day results and should wait until the Democrats count all their illegal ballots .

Children and adolescents who speak more than one language may reach adulthood with more grey matter, according to a new study.
In a paper published in Brain Structure and Function, an international team of academics led by the University of Reading and Georgetown University looked at detailed scans of children’s and adolescents’ brains and found that bilingual participants had potential advantages of both grey and white matter than similarly-aged children who spoke only one language.
While bilingualism has previously been shown to positively affect brain structure and cognitive performance in adults, the paper is the most comprehensive analysis to date showing that the effect of speaking more than one language may have similar impacts on developing brains.
Dr Christos Pliatsikas, the leader of the project and an Associate Professor of Psycholinguistics in Bi and Multilinguals at the University of Reading said:
“Grey matter in the brain decreases from an early age, but our study found that key brain areas showed less such shrinkage in bilinguals than monolinguals during development.”
“In previous studies, we’ve already seen that bilingualism has a positive effect on grey and white matter in adult brains, but this is the first time we’ve seen strong evidence for these effects in children and adolescents as well.”
Dr Michael Ullman, senior author on the paper and Professor of Neuroscience at Georgetown University Medical Center, said:
“It may be the case that the effects on the brain that we have seen in adult bilinguals have their roots in childhood. We will be looking more at this in future studies.”
More grey matter
The brain scans showed that the loss in grey matter that children and adolescents experience during development was less pronounced in bilinguals than those who only spoke one language.
Grey matter refers to the portions of the brain where the bodies of brain cells are found, such as around the surface of the brain (called the cortex). White matter refers to parts of the brain containing the connections between brain cells, allowing them to communicate (the connections are white because they are insulated with fat).
The study found that that the bilinguals kept more grey matter during brain development, and also increased white matter, suggesting more efficient brain communication. In both cases the effects were found mainly in brain areas linked to language learning and use.
Dr Christos Pliatsikas said:
“This is an important study for two reasons. The first is that by looking at the brains of children and adolescents, we can start to see how and when bilingualism has an effect on the brain during language development. While we’ve previously looked at differences between bilingual and monolingual adult brains at static points, here we see the effect of bilingualism on the brain as we develop.”
“Second, the impact of bilingualism on grey and white matter may have a number of wider benefits for language and cognitive function, such as performance in tasks related to attention and executive control, which have been suggested to be enhanced in older bilinguals. Overall, the findings indicate that encouraging bilingualism in childhood may have benefits later in life.”
Alex Jones examines and reacts to an HBO/Axios gaslighting mind control piece on how Americans should not accept election day results and should wait until the Democrats count all their illegal ballots.


newswars--2020-09-02--Watch: Joy Villa Claims Uber Driver Kicked Her Out Over “Trump 2020” Dress

Vocalist Joy Villa claims she was discriminated against politically by an irate Uber driver who refused to transport her to @ @ @ @ @ “ Trump 2020 ” dress .
Villa described her awful ride-share experience in a video @ @ @ @ @ explaining she was wearing the same dress she wore earlier this year at the 2020 @ @ @ @ @ decided to change out of the outfit before her next Uber arrived .

Vocalist Joy Villa claims she was discriminated against politically by an irate Uber driver who refused to transport her to the airport due to a “Trump 2020” dress.
Villa described her awful ride-share experience in a video uploaded to YouTube Tuesday, explaining she was wearing the same dress she wore earlier this year at the 2020 Grammys, and claiming she decided to change out of the outfit before her next Uber arrived.


newswars--2020-09-02--Bill and Hillary Warn Biden: “Do Not Concede Under Any Circumstance”

Former first couple Bill and Hillary Clinton urged Democrat presidential contender Joe Biden to reject defeat in the upcoming 2020 election .
In an interview with leftist journalist April Ryan , the former president and first lady talked up Biden and launched joint attacks on President Donald Trump , who they asserted would refuse to leave the White House if he loses in November .
“ Do not concede under any circumstance because I believe the other side is going to cheat and sneak and try everything they possibly can , ” Hillary cautioned Biden during the Instagram Live broadcast @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to his Resolute desk , Bill claimed he ’ d likely barricade himself inside the White House .
More on the conversation from Washington Examiner ’ s Paul Bedard : After Ryan joked that Trump ’ s “ orange knuckles ” won ’ t let go of his Oval Office desk , Bill Clinton laughed and added , “ He probably won ’ t even come to Biden ’ s inauguration .
He ’ ll be stacking sandbags around in the White House.
” Elsewhere in the interview , Bill goes on to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He told Ryan , “ It ’ s very important to keep in mind that beneath all these big questions you are asking are just Donald Trump ’ s proven ability to manipulate the psyche of the people that he is trying to scare the hell out of .
Now , this is a person who says , ‘ OK , I can ’ t win on my own , but people will believe whatever I tell them as long as it ’ s bad.
” He added , “ He can not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who he is .
He believes we ’ re suckers .
He believes he can say anything and make it work .
He believes he can do anything and no one will stop [ him ] .
” Hillary painted Trump as the destroyer of civil liberties .
Hillary Clinton said , “ He is a clear and present danger to our freedoms , our liberties , our unity , and we ’ ve got to defeat him .
There is no alternative.
” As expected , the Deep State power couple oozes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ still reeling from Trump ’ s unexpected 2016 victory , but the “ don ’ t concede ” talking point is one Dems have been running with lately due to the president ’ s criticism of mail-in voting , which he argues can easily be rigged , or corrupted .
Hillary made the same comment last month in an interview with former aide Jennifer Palmieri , telling her , “ Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances because I think this is going to drag out , and eventually , I do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t give an inch and if we are as focused and relentless as the other side is ”

Former first couple Bill and Hillary Clinton urged Democrat presidential contender Joe Biden to reject defeat in the upcoming 2020 election.
In an interview with leftist journalist April Ryan, the former president and first lady talked up Biden and launched joint attacks on President Donald Trump, who they asserted would refuse to leave the White House if he loses in November.
“Do not concede under any circumstance because I believe the other side is going to cheat and sneak and try everything they possibly can,” Hillary cautioned Biden during the Instagram Live broadcast.
After Ryan claimed Trump would cling to his Resolute desk, Bill claimed he’d likely barricade himself inside the White House.
More on the conversation from Washington Examiner’s Paul Bedard:
After Ryan joked that Trump’s “orange knuckles” won’t let go of his Oval Office desk, Bill Clinton laughed and added, “He probably won’t even come to Biden’s inauguration. He’ll be stacking sandbags around in the White House.”
Elsewhere in the interview, Bill goes on to claim Trump is “manipulating… suckers.”
He told Ryan, “It’s very important to keep in mind that beneath all these big questions you are asking are just Donald Trump’s proven ability to manipulate the psyche of the people that he is trying to scare the hell out of. Now, this is a person who says, ‘OK, I can’t win on my own, but people will believe whatever I tell them as long as it’s bad.”
He added, “He cannot help who he is. He is who he is. He believes we’re suckers. He believes he can say anything and make it work. He believes he can do anything and no one will stop [him].”
Hillary painted Trump as the destroyer of civil liberties.
Hillary Clinton said, “He is a clear and present danger to our freedoms, our liberties, our unity, and we’ve got to defeat him. There is no alternative.”
As expected, the Deep State power couple oozes with bitterness throughout the interview, likely still reeling from Trump’s unexpected 2016 victory, but the “don’t concede” talking point is one Dems have been running with lately due to the president’s criticism of mail-in voting, which he argues can easily be rigged, or corrupted.
For our Country to be sending 80 million UNSOLICITED BALLOTS is very unfair and a roadmap to disaster. Even recent small and easier to control elections which did this are a catastrophic disaster. Fraudulent & missing Ballots like never seen before. 20% and 30% off. STOP! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 25, 2020
Hillary made the same comment last month in an interview with former aide Jennifer Palmieri, telling her, “Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances because I think this is going to drag out, and eventually, I do believe he will win if we don’t give an inch and if we are as focused and relentless as the other side is”
Follow the author on Gab: https://gab.ai/adansalazar
On Twitter: Follow @AdanSalazarWins
On Parler: https://parler.com/profile/adansalazar/
On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/adan.salazar.735
On Minds: https://www.minds.com/adan_infowars


newswars--2020-09-02--India Deploys Troops to Border Amid Boiling Tensions With China – Report

After another face-off between troops in Eastern Ladakh region ’ s Chushul Valley overnight on 29-30 August , India has issued a high alert along the border with China , Nepal and Bhutan .
Preempting action from Chinese forces , the troops have been asked to remaintain vigilant , especially at the tri-junction area in Lipulekh .
The Indian army has reportedly moved its troops to guard the eastern stretch of the loosely-demarcated border with China in Arunachal Pradesh since June , according to a government official quoted by Reuters .
With the increased military presence in the Anjaw district @ @ @ @ @ @ @ higher chances of a face-off in the region , analysts believe , since the region was a flare point during the 1962 war between India and China .
While the official in the region confirmed that troops had ramped up activity following the Galwan incident on 15-16 June , she also noted that the build-up had started prior to the skirmish .
Nevertheless , an Indian military spokesman , Lieutenant Colonel Harsh Wardhan Pande , has said that there ’ s no cause for concern and the troops arriving in the area were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Basically , it ’ s units changing .
That ’ s happening as it happens every time , nothing much , ” Pande told Reuters from Guwahati , the largest city in northeastern India .
With Indian troops stationed at strategically-important points in the Ladakh region , speculations are rife that Chinese troops may open another front along the 4,057km Line of Control .
The Indian home ministry has even issued an alert , cautioning troops along the China , Nepal and Bhutan border .
The northeastern region of India is the most @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been mobilizing separatist movements and insurgents in the region .
India and China have been in a border stand-off since the last week of April and the disengagement of troops is far from over along the Line of Actual Control .
The situation has become more tense since the 29-30 August altercation between Indian and Chinese troops .
China ’ s Foreign Ministry spokesperson has said that to his knowledge , no Indian soldiers were killed in the recent border clash .
Tensions between the two countries reached a boiling point in mid-June @ @ @ @ @ @ @ between troops in the Galwan Valley in the disputed Ladakh region .
The skirmish claimed the lives of 20 Indian soldiers , while Beijing has not officially reported any casualties .
Since then , the two sides have been engaged in high-level talks to ease tensions .
NYC is now falling apart under poor leadership .

After another face-off between troops in Eastern Ladakh region’s Chushul Valley overnight on 29-30 August, India has issued a high alert along the border with China, Nepal and Bhutan.
Preempting action from Chinese forces, the troops have been asked to remaintain vigilant, especially at the tri-junction area in Lipulekh.
The Indian army has reportedly moved its troops to guard the eastern stretch of the loosely-demarcated border with China in Arunachal Pradesh since June, according to a government official quoted by Reuters.
With the increased military presence in the Anjaw district of the north-eastern state, there are higher chances of a face-off in the region, analysts believe, since the region was a flare point during the 1962 war between India and China.
While the official in the region confirmed that troops had ramped up activity following the Galwan incident on 15-16 June, she also noted that the build-up had started prior to the skirmish.
Nevertheless, an Indian military spokesman, Lieutenant Colonel Harsh Wardhan Pande, has said that there’s no cause for concern and the troops arriving in the area were part of a regular rotation.
“Basically, it’s units changing. That’s happening as it happens every time, nothing much,” Pande told Reuters from Guwahati, the largest city in northeastern India.
With Indian troops stationed at strategically-important points in the Ladakh region, speculations are rife that Chinese troops may open another front along the 4,057km Line of Control. The Indian home ministry has even issued an alert, cautioning troops along the China, Nepal and Bhutan border.
The northeastern region of India is the most sensitive, considering accusations that China has been mobilizing separatist movements and insurgents in the region.
India and China have been in a border stand-off since the last week of April and the disengagement of troops is far from over along the Line of Actual Control. The situation has become more tense since the 29-30 August altercation between Indian and Chinese troops. China’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson has said that to his knowledge, no Indian soldiers were killed in the recent border clash.
Tensions between the two countries reached a boiling point in mid-June, when a deadly face-off broke out between troops in the Galwan Valley in the disputed Ladakh region. The skirmish claimed the lives of 20 Indian soldiers, while Beijing has not officially reported any casualties. Since then, the two sides have been engaged in high-level talks to ease tensions.
NYC is now falling apart under poor leadership.