newswars--2020-09-22--Huge Explosion Hits South Lebanon Centered on Hezbollah Arms Depot

A powerful blast in south Lebanon caused temporary panic after it was heard and felt for miles away on Tuesday .
Images and video of the explosion spread across social media Tuesday , with initial conflicting reports saying it was either the result of an Israeli attack , or a gas station that went up in flames .
Hours after , Al Jazeera and other regional media confirmed the site was an arms depot belonging to Hezbollah .
The Shia paramilitary group which routinely exchanges fire along the border with Israel claimed a “ technical error ” was behind detonating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ Lebanon ’ s official news agency , NNA , said the explosion took place in the southern village Ein Qana , about 50km ( 30 miles ) south of the capital Beirut , ” Al Jazeera reports .
Lebanon is still on edge after seven weeks ago a massive amount of stored ammonium nitrate detonated at the Beirut Port , killing hundreds and wounding many thousands .
Al Jazeera details further of the latest incident : Hezbollah ’ s media office told Al Jazeera the explosion was caused by a “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which sent a huge column of black smoke into the sky… “ This explosion was at a house that stored weapons – result of technical error .
No one was killed or injured .
The building belonged to a Hezbollah affiliated de-mining association , ” Al Jazeera ’ s Zeina Khodr , reporting from Beirut , said .
However , there are currently conflicting casualty reports , with some local media saying there have been injuries and possibly deaths .
Hezbollah has been accused of blocking journalists and even state security officials @ @ @ @ @ @ @ aftermath .
There are also accusations and rising anger that it appears Hezbollah was storing weapons in the center of a busy residential area .
The blast aftermath looks to have caused significant and widespread damage in the village : The entire country also is used to closely watching events in southern Lebanon , a Hezbollah stronghold , especially along the tense border given a history of conflict with Israel .
The population is still outraged and is seeking answers from authorities over their severe mismanagement of dangerous materials which had been stored @ @ @ @ @ @ @ series of smaller blasts and fires have further fueled outrage in the streets .
Our political climate has levied a lopsided justice system to the point that Jake Gardner , a Nebraska bar owner chose to commit suicide rather than face prison for defending his life , liberty , and property .

A powerful blast in south Lebanon caused temporary panic after it was heard and felt for miles away on Tuesday.
Images and video of the explosion spread across social media Tuesday, with initial conflicting reports saying it was either the result of an Israeli attack, or a gas station that went up in flames.
Hours after, Al Jazeera and other regional media confirmed the site was an arms depot belonging to Hezbollah. The Shia paramilitary group which routinely exchanges fire along the border with Israel claimed a “technical error” was behind detonating the facility, which reportedly contained mines.
“Lebanon’s official news agency, NNA, said the explosion took place in the southern village Ein Qana, about 50km (30 miles) south of the capital Beirut,” Al Jazeera reports.
WATCH: A Hezbollah weapon warehouse just exploded in Southern Lebanon. They claimed it was a gas station. Yeah right. Even Lebanese people don’t buy these lies. #Hezbollah #Lebanon pic.twitter.com/0bSVsJtp41 — Hananya Naftali (@HananyaNaftali) September 22, 2020
Lebanon is still on edge after seven weeks ago a massive amount of stored ammonium nitrate detonated at the Beirut Port, killing hundreds and wounding many thousands. Al Jazeera details further of the latest incident:
Hezbollah’s media office told Al Jazeera the explosion was caused by a “technical error” at their arms depot, which sent a huge column of black smoke into the sky…
“This explosion was at a house that stored weapons – result of technical error. No one was killed or injured. The building belonged to a Hezbollah affiliated de-mining association,” Al Jazeera’s Zeina Khodr, reporting from Beirut, said.
However, there are currently conflicting casualty reports, with some local media saying there have been injuries and possibly deaths.
#BREAKING South #Lebanon explosion in Ain Qana was at a #Hezbollah arms depot, caused by technical error. At least 4 dead. pic.twitter.com/FRDZjhuu8l — #RebuildBeirut (@LebaneseProblem) September 22, 2020
Hezbollah has been accused of blocking journalists and even state security officials’ access to the site in the aftermath.
There are also accusations and rising anger that it appears Hezbollah was storing weapons in the center of a busy residential area.
The blast aftermath looks to have caused significant and widespread damage in the village:
Large #explosion today at Ein Qana in South #Lebanon, south-east of Sidon. Significant amount of damage visible. Cause unknown. pic.twitter.com/iWAb8DJBcy — Donatella Rovera (@DRovera) September 22, 2020
The entire country also is used to closely watching events in southern Lebanon, a Hezbollah stronghold, especially along the tense border given a history of conflict with Israel.
The population is still outraged and is seeking answers from authorities over their severe mismanagement of dangerous materials which had been stored at the port for years. A series of smaller blasts and fires have further fueled outrage in the streets.
Our political climate has levied a lopsided justice system to the point that Jake Gardner, a Nebraska bar owner chose to commit suicide rather than face prison for defending his life, liberty, and property.


newswars--2020-09-22--Economist Warns: Fed Calling For More QE

Monday ( Sept. 21 ) looked a lot like March with everything selling off as the dollar rallied .
There was a sudden burst of risk-off sentiment due to worries that a spike in coronavirus cases could lead to new economic lockdowns coupled with significant political uncertainty after the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg .
Peter Schiff talked about the big selloff in his podcast , and he thinks there a deeper underlying reason for the sudden volatility .
Markets are worried that the Fed and the US government aren ’ t stimulating enough .
The Dow @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interday low .
It rallied into the close bust still closed down 509 points .
The S & P 500 closed down just over 1 % .
The NASDAQ was the strongest of the indexes , but still closed off 14 points .
The Russell 2000 was the weakest , down 3.3 % .
Meanwhile , gold and silver also got hammered .
Gold fell below $ 1,900 for a time , but rallied back to close above that key support level .
Most of the commentary during Monday ’ s slide revolved @ @ @ @ @ @ @ European banking system , but Peter said he thinks there was a more fundamental reason for the big selloff .
“ That is the idea that the Federal Reserve is no loose enough .
The Fed ’ s monetary policy is not dovish enough.
” Even though at the September FOMC meeting , the Fed indicated it plans to hold interest rates at zero at least through 2023 and it plans to continue quantitative easing at current levels , the markets said , “ That ’ s not enough.
” “ The markets @ @ @ @ @ @ @ much bigger than the one that we had back then ( 2008 ) that it requires far more air coming from the Fed to keep it from deflating .
So , we need more .
The Fed needs to talk about negative interest rates .
The Fed needs to commit to bigger quantitative easing.
” Of course , in effect , the central bank is calling for more QE as Jerome Powell eggs on Congress to pass additional fiscal stimulus .
“ Any additional fiscal stimulus automatically requires more monetary stimulus , because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the money for the fiscal stimulus ?
It ’ s going to get it from the Fed .
That ’ s what supposedly makes it a stimulus is that the government is going to run larger deficits .
It ’ s going to spend money it doesn ’ t have.
” But there is concern that if Congress and the White House can ’ t get some type of fiscal stimulus package passed , the Fed won ’ t just provide more monetary stimulus on its own .
“ All that monetary stimulus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fiscal stimulus , is pump up the asset markets – the stock market , the real estate market , or bond market .
It ’ s not going to do anything for the real economy .
I think the Fed believes that what will help the real economy is the fiscal stimulus .
Now , the Fed is wrong .
That ’ s not going to help the real economy either.
” With all of the political turmoil , ratcheted up by the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg , the possibility of getting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ likely .
Peter said he thinks the stock market will continue to be shaky and the sell-off could even gain momentum unless we get a concrete commitment to more monetary stimulus from the Fed , which may require something coming from Congress in terms of fiscal stimulus .
“ Which again , doesn ’ t stimulate the economy .
But it will stimulate the markets .
It will provide the addicts on Wall Street the drug they need in order to bid stock prices higher.
” But Peter said he thinks even if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deal done , the Fed will ultimately act on its own .
“ Because the Fed will see the weakness in the market as a sign that the economy is going to weaken because it realizes that it is the wealth effect that is powering whatever recovery it thinks is in progress .
And so if that is in jeopardy , I think the Fed will act unilaterally.
” No matter how you get it – more stimulus is bullish for gold and silver in the long-term .
This recent dip could be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ podcast , Peter also broke down the politics behind the looming Supreme Court fight .
Our political climate has levied a lopsided justice system to the point that Jake Gardner , a Nebraska bar owner chose to commit suicide rather than face prison for defending his life , liberty , and property .

Monday (Sept. 21) looked a lot like March with everything selling off as the dollar rallied.
There was a sudden burst of risk-off sentiment due to worries that a spike in coronavirus cases could lead to new economic lockdowns coupled with significant political uncertainty after the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Peter Schiff talked about the big selloff in his podcast, and he thinks there a deeper underlying reason for the sudden volatility. Markets are worried that the Fed and the US government aren’t stimulating enough.
The Dow was down over 940 points at its interday low. It rallied into the close bust still closed down 509 points. The S&P 500 closed down just over 1%. The NASDAQ was the strongest of the indexes, but still closed off 14 points. The Russell 2000 was the weakest, down 3.3%.
Meanwhile, gold and silver also got hammered. Gold fell below $1,900 for a time, but rallied back to close above that key support level.
Most of the commentary during Monday’s slide revolved around COVID-19 fears and problems in the European banking system, but Peter said he thinks there was a more fundamental reason for the big selloff.
“That is the idea that the Federal Reserve is no loose enough. The Fed’s monetary policy is not dovish enough.”
Even though at the September FOMC meeting, the Fed indicated it plans to hold interest rates at zero at least through 2023 and it plans to continue quantitative easing at current levels, the markets said, “That’s not enough.”
“The markets need more. This bubble is so much bigger than the one that we had back then (2008) that it requires far more air coming from the Fed to keep it from deflating. So, we need more. The Fed needs to talk about negative interest rates. The Fed needs to commit to bigger quantitative easing.”
Of course, in effect, the central bank is calling for more QE as Jerome Powell eggs on Congress to pass additional fiscal stimulus.
“Any additional fiscal stimulus automatically requires more monetary stimulus, because where is the government going to get the money for the fiscal stimulus? It’s going to get it from the Fed. That’s what supposedly makes it a stimulus is that the government is going to run larger deficits. It’s going to spend money it doesn’t have.”
But there is concern that if Congress and the White House can’t get some type of fiscal stimulus package passed, the Fed won’t just provide more monetary stimulus on its own.
“All that monetary stimulus is going to do, absent the fiscal stimulus, is pump up the asset markets – the stock market, the real estate market, or bond market. It’s not going to do anything for the real economy. I think the Fed believes that what will help the real economy is the fiscal stimulus. Now, the Fed is wrong. That’s not going to help the real economy either.”
With all of the political turmoil, ratcheted up by the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the possibility of getting a fiscal stimulus deal done appears less likely.
Peter said he thinks the stock market will continue to be shaky and the sell-off could even gain momentum unless we get a concrete commitment to more monetary stimulus from the Fed, which may require something coming from Congress in terms of fiscal stimulus.
“Which again, doesn’t stimulate the economy. But it will stimulate the markets. It will provide the addicts on Wall Street the drug they need in order to bid stock prices higher.”
But Peter said he thinks even if Congress can’t get a stimulus deal done, the Fed will ultimately act on its own.
“Because the Fed will see the weakness in the market as a sign that the economy is going to weaken because it realizes that it is the wealth effect that is powering whatever recovery it thinks is in progress. And so if that is in jeopardy, I think the Fed will act unilaterally.”
No matter how you get it – more stimulus is bullish for gold and silver in the long-term. This recent dip could be a nice buying opportunity.
In this podcast, Peter also broke down the politics behind the looming Supreme Court fight.
Our political climate has levied a lopsided justice system to the point that Jake Gardner, a Nebraska bar owner chose to commit suicide rather than face prison for defending his life, liberty, and property.


newswars--2020-09-22--Louisville Boarded Up in Preparation For Potential Breonna Taylor Riots

Areas of Louisville , Kentucky have been boarded up as the city prepares for potential riots in response to a grand jury ruling on the killing of Breonna Taylor .
Taylor was shot and killed by LMPD officers who were serving a warrant on her apartment back in March .
The level of violent unrest will almost exclusively depend on whether charges are brought against the three officers involved , Sgt .
Jonathan Mattingly , officer Myles Cosgrove and former officer Brett Hankison .
Taylor ’ s family has already received a $ 12 million dollar settlement after a wrongful @ @ @ @ @ @ @ guaranteed to spill over into chaotic disorder if the officers escape charges .
Journalist Hayes Gardner posted a series of images illustrating how the city is gearing up for the unrest .
The city ’ s courthouse has been closed all week and is being protected , along with three other federal buildings , by Homeland Security agents .
Gas stations and shop fronts have also had protective measures added , while access to downtown is being heavily restricted .
Vehicle barricades have been placed around Jefferson Square Park and other areas , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tightly controlled .
A state of emergency has been declared and all requested off days for officers were cancelled as of Monday .
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch .
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here .
Also , I urgently need your financial support here .

Areas of Louisville, Kentucky have been boarded up as the city prepares for potential riots in response to a grand jury ruling on the killing of Breonna Taylor.
Taylor was shot and killed by LMPD officers who were serving a warrant on her apartment back in March.
The level of violent unrest will almost exclusively depend on whether charges are brought against the three officers involved, Sgt. Jonathan Mattingly, officer Myles Cosgrove and former officer Brett Hankison.
Taylor’s family has already received a $12 million dollar settlement after a wrongful death lawsuit, but tensions are virtually guaranteed to spill over into chaotic disorder if the officers escape charges.
Here’s the area around Jefferson Square Park, the hub of protests. pic.twitter.com/mYT5Yo0SbT — Hayes Gardner (@HayesGardner) September 22, 2020
Journalist Hayes Gardner posted a series of images illustrating how the city is gearing up for the unrest.
The city’s courthouse has been closed all week and is being protected, along with three other federal buildings, by Homeland Security agents.
Gas stations and shop fronts have also had protective measures added, while access to downtown is being heavily restricted.
Vehicle barricades have been placed around Jefferson Square Park and other areas, while traffic and parking is also being tightly controlled.
A state of emergency has been declared and all requested off days for officers were cancelled as of Monday.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Also, I urgently need your financial support here.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-09-22--How CDC/WHO will fake the effects of the COVID vaccine to make it look like a success

Making a vaccine look like it ’ s a champion isn ’ t difficult for public health agencies .
There are a number of strategies .
Of course , these fraudulent strategies would be serious crimes .
But when has that stopped the CDC or the World Health Organization ?
In no particular order—- ONE : Rework the definition of a “ COVID case.
” Presently , the CDC absurdly allows doctors to diagnose a person with COVID who has a cough , or chills and fever , and lives in an area where cases are being claimed .
No @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , once the vaccine is approved .
Demand testing for a diagnosis .
State that cough alone is not enough .
Chills and fever must also be present .
Require fever to be above 100 .
These and other changes would automatically shrink the number of cases .
The drop in numbers would be attributed to the vaccine .
This “ definitional shrinking ” was , in fact , deployed in the 1950s , after the introduction of the polio vaccine .
TWO : Order a change in the way the PCR diagnostic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ amplifying the original test sample from the patient occurs in cycles , or jumps .
The greater the number of cycles , the more likely the test will result in a COVID diagnosis .
Therefore , order a reduced number of cycles for all testing labs .
THREE : Quietly restrict the present hospital practice of arbitrarily writing “ COVID ” on patient case and death files .
FOUR : Cook up and publish false studies showing more and more people are developing immunity to the virus .
Attribute this to the vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ study— “ the transmission of the virus from person to person is slowing , thanks to the vaccine.
” SIX : Pump up the success of issuing Immunity certificates after vaccination .
“ People are feeling safer now .
More businesses are reopening… ” SEVEN : Using the compliant press , simply issue bald declarations that the vaccine is a success .
EIGHT : Hide the many instances of injury and death from the vaccine .
When necessary , claim COVID was the cause .
NINE : Warn that the wonderful vaccine-derived immunity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shots are necessary .
TEN : Rework the definition of “ vaccine-acquired immunity.
” Even a very weak antibody response from the shot would qualify as “ protective immunity.
” ELEVEN : Huge numbers of people with ordinary flu-like illness , pneumonia , and other traditional lung infections are being called “ COVID.
” Change this practice .
Go back to calling many of these people “ flu , ” “ pneumonia , ” etc .
COVID case numbers will drop .
Claim the drop is the effect of the vaccine .
TWELVE @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cases have “ co-morbidities.
” These are prior serious health conditions which are , in fact , the true causes of illnesses and death .
Of course , this is denied .
But after the vaccine is introduced… scale back the practice of counting all these ill and deceased co-morbid patients as “ COVID.
” Case and death numbers will drop .
Claim the vaccine is the reason .
THIRTEEN : After the vaccine is introduced , slow down testing for a brief period .
This will automatically reduce the rate of new @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine .
Committing these crimes are a walk in the park for public health agencies .
And appointing official mouthpieces to carry lies to the public is as easy as training little Faucis to sit up and bark .
This article first appeared at NoMoreFakeNews.com .
DARPA funded implantable biochip to detect covid could hit markets by 2021. incredible covid news .
We knew the Rockefeller foundation and other groups were developing vaccines .
When we covered it they called us insane , yet they are on video saying it !

Making a vaccine look like it’s a champion isn’t difficult for public health agencies. There are a number of strategies.
Of course, these fraudulent strategies would be serious crimes. But when has that stopped the CDC or the World Health Organization?
In no particular order—-
ONE: Rework the definition of a “COVID case.” Presently, the CDC absurdly allows doctors to diagnose a person with COVID who has a cough, or chills and fever, and lives in an area where cases are being claimed. No test necessary.
So change this practice, once the vaccine is approved. Demand testing for a diagnosis. State that cough alone is not enough. Chills and fever must also be present. Require fever to be above 100.
These and other changes would automatically shrink the number of cases. The drop in numbers would be attributed to the vaccine.
This “definitional shrinking” was, in fact, deployed in the 1950s, after the introduction of the polio vaccine.
TWO: Order a change in the way the PCR diagnostic test is done. The practice of amplifying the original test sample from the patient occurs in cycles, or jumps. The greater the number of cycles, the more likely the test will result in a COVID diagnosis. Therefore, order a reduced number of cycles for all testing labs.
Outcome? Fewer COVID diagnoses. Fewer case numbers. “The vaccine is working.”
THREE: Quietly restrict the present hospital practice of arbitrarily writing “COVID” on patient case and death files.
FOUR: Cook up and publish false studies showing more and more people are developing immunity to the virus. Attribute this to the vaccine.
FIVE: Another type of false study—“the transmission of the virus from person to person is slowing, thanks to the vaccine.”
SIX: Pump up the success of issuing Immunity certificates after vaccination. “People are feeling safer now. More businesses are reopening…”
SEVEN: Using the compliant press, simply issue bald declarations that the vaccine is a success.
EIGHT: Hide the many instances of injury and death from the vaccine. When necessary, claim COVID was the cause.
NINE: Warn that the wonderful vaccine-derived immunity is not permanent, and frequent booster shots are necessary.
TEN: Rework the definition of “vaccine-acquired immunity.” Even a very weak antibody response from the shot would qualify as “protective immunity.”
ELEVEN: Huge numbers of people with ordinary flu-like illness, pneumonia, and other traditional lung infections are being called “COVID.” Change this practice. Go back to calling many of these people “flu,” “pneumonia,” etc. COVID case numbers will drop. Claim the drop is the effect of the vaccine.
TWELVE: Presently, millions of so-called COVID cases have “co-morbidities.” These are prior serious health conditions which are, in fact, the true causes of illnesses and death. Of course, this is denied. But after the vaccine is introduced… scale back the practice of counting all these ill and deceased co-morbid patients as “COVID.” Case and death numbers will drop. Claim the vaccine is the reason.
THIRTEEN: After the vaccine is introduced, slow down testing for a brief period. This will automatically reduce the rate of new cases. Attribute the decline to the vaccine.
Committing these crimes are a walk in the park for public health agencies.
And appointing official mouthpieces to carry lies to the public is as easy as training little Faucis to sit up and bark.
This article first appeared at NoMoreFakeNews.com.
DARPA funded implantable biochip to detect covid could hit markets by 2021. incredible covid news. We knew the Rockefeller foundation and other groups were developing vaccines. When we covered it they called us insane, yet they are on video saying it!


newswars--2020-09-22--Massive “F**k Cuomo And de Blasio” Mural Painted On New York Street

New York City residents protested their Democrat governor and mayor on Saturday by writing , “ F**k Cuomo And de Blasio ” on a Williamsburg , Brooklyn street in the same style as “ Black Lives Matter ” murals painted throughout the country this year .
The New York Post reported , “ The not-so-subtle shout-out to Gov .
Andrew Cuomo and Mayor Bill de Blasio went up around 1 a.m. Saturday on North 15th Street between Wythe Avenue and Banker Street in Williamsburg , during the waning hours of an annual block party which this year doubled as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ An attendee of the block party protest told The Post , “ A few partygoers got the idea to paint in huge [ letters , using ] yellow paint with rollers on North 15th , ‘ F–k Cuomo and de Blasio.
’ The party continued .
Everyone took photos .
It was a big hit .
The crowds cheered , even the cops chuckled.
” The protest artwork was taken down by city workers within 24-hours of being painted .
A criminal mischief complaint was filed over the anti-Cuomo and de Blasio mural @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to NYPD .
Meanwhile , Bill de Blasio , who joined Al Sharpton in painting “ Black Lives Matter ” on the street outside Trump Tower , assigned 27 police officers to protect the BLM mural .
When a woman dressed as “ Lady Liberty ” covered BLM street art with red paint in August , NYPD officers had her arrested .
The face mask debate escalates to the point of “ negligent homicide ” as NY Gov .
Cuomo accuses President Trump of “ trying to kill New York City ” .

New York City residents protested their Democrat governor and mayor on Saturday by writing, “F**k Cuomo And de Blasio” on a Williamsburg, Brooklyn street in the same style as “Black Lives Matter” murals painted throughout the country this year.
The New York Post reported, “The not-so-subtle shout-out to Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Mayor Bill de Blasio went up around 1 a.m. Saturday on North 15th Street between Wythe Avenue and Banker Street in Williamsburg, during the waning hours of an annual block party which this year doubled as a ‘small business owner protest.’”
An attendee of the block party protest told The Post, “A few partygoers got the idea to paint in huge [letters, using] yellow paint with rollers on North 15th, ‘F–k Cuomo and de Blasio.’ The party continued. Everyone took photos. It was a big hit. The crowds cheered, even the cops chuckled.”
The protest artwork was taken down by city workers within 24-hours of being painted.
A criminal mischief complaint was filed over the anti-Cuomo and de Blasio mural and an investigation is ongoing, according to NYPD.
Meanwhile, Bill de Blasio, who joined Al Sharpton in painting “Black Lives Matter” on the street outside Trump Tower, assigned 27 police officers to protect the BLM mural.
When a woman dressed as “Lady Liberty” covered BLM street art with red paint in August, NYPD officers had her arrested.
Why the double standard?
The face mask debate escalates to the point of “negligent homicide” as NY Gov. Cuomo accuses President Trump of “trying to kill New York City”.


newswars--2020-09-22--Young Man Injured by Gardasil Files Lawsuit Against Merck as Cases Pile Up

( Natural News ) A lawsuit was filed last week against pharmaceutical firm Merck on behalf of a young man who was injured by their HPV vaccine Gardasil .
The suit , which was filed by Baum Hedlund Aristei & Goldman , seeks punitive damages for their negligence along with liability for failure to warn and a manufacturing defect , common law fraud , breach of warranty and other charges .
The young man at the center of the suit is Zachariah Otto , who was 16 when he received his first dose of the dangerous vaccine .
He claims @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as autoimmune disease , mast cell activation syndrome , small fiber neuropathy , orthostatic intolerance , dysautonomia , and chronic fatigue syndrome .
He also says it caused the autoimmune system disease postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome , or POTS , which impacts critical bodily functions and causes symptoms such as fainting , anxiety and migraines .
Otto is now so disabled that he can not attend college in person or work .
He is considered legally disabled and suffers from a slew of health problems .
Needless to say , he can not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and his mother is serving as his primary caregiver while nurses visit his home to give him IV therapy to help with his autoimmune injuries .
According to his mother , the intense marketing campaign carried out by Merck encouraged her son to get Gardasil ; had they known about the serious risks , they would not have gotten the shots .
Otto ’ s co-counsel , Robert F. Kennedy , Jr. of Children ’ s Health Defense , stated : “ Merck fast-tracked Gardasil by presenting misleading data to the FDA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ claimed they were ‘ filling an unmet medical ’ need but in reality , the only thing Merck was interested in filling was the $ 6 billion financial hole created by the Vioxx scandal.
” The list of Gardasil victims continues to grow Other Gardasil victims have similar stories .
A 25-year-old former athlete , Jennifer Robi , is now confined to a wheelchair after getting the shot .
She got the first one when she was 16 , and like Otto , she was also diagnosed with POTS as a result .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the vaccine , amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate , is behind the problem because it can overstimulate people ’ s immune systems to the point where they start attacking their own organs .
Another victim , Colton Berrett , got his first shot at age 13 before leaving for a Boy Scouts camp on the advice of his doctor in 2014 .
Just two weeks after getting his third dose , his arms and hands became paralyzed ; the paralysis eventually spread to leave him completely paralyzed from the neck down and dependent on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ removed himself from his ventilator .
Gardasil is often thought of as being for girls given that its stated purpose is preventing cervical cancer .
However , Otto ’ s attorneys claim Merck has been making billions by marketing the shot to the parents of young men and boys , claiming that it is safe and effective despite being neither .
Moreover , they allege the company knew about the potential for serious health problems .
In a press release , Otto said : “ My life is a constant battle between attempting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ back by my own body ’ s limitations .
Gardasil has turned my body into a prison , an anchor that won ’ t afford me the ability to live an independent life and one that significantly restricts my ability to grow as a person.
” A lot of parents fail to realize that Merck has never proven Gardasil can prevent cervical cancer or any other type of cancer .
In clinical trials , they did not use a true placebo to help mask dangerous side effects .
Unfortunately , many Big Pharma @ @ @ @ @ @ @ make dangerous products appear safe and rake in the profits at the expense of public health .
Rushed with no regards for safety codes and lavishly funded — just like the vaccine itself .
Listeners send building plans and documents of the coming mass vaccination program — the final solution of # OperationWarpSpeed

(Natural News) A lawsuit was filed last week against pharmaceutical firm Merck on behalf of a young man who was injured by their HPV vaccine Gardasil. The suit, which was filed by Baum Hedlund Aristei & Goldman, seeks punitive damages for their negligence along with liability for failure to warn and a manufacturing defect, common law fraud, breach of warranty and other charges.
The young man at the center of the suit is Zachariah Otto, who was 16 when he received his first dose of the dangerous vaccine. He claims the vaccine has caused life-changing injuries such as autoimmune disease, mast cell activation syndrome, small fiber neuropathy, orthostatic intolerance, dysautonomia, and chronic fatigue syndrome. He also says it caused the autoimmune system disease postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, or POTS, which impacts critical bodily functions and causes symptoms such as fainting, anxiety and migraines.
Otto is now so disabled that he cannot attend college in person or work. He is considered legally disabled and suffers from a slew of health problems. Needless to say, he cannot engage in the activities normal teenagers enjoy, and his mother is serving as his primary caregiver while nurses visit his home to give him IV therapy to help with his autoimmune injuries.
According to his mother, the intense marketing campaign carried out by Merck encouraged her son to get Gardasil; had they known about the serious risks, they would not have gotten the shots.
Otto’s co-counsel, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. of Children’s Health Defense, stated: “Merck fast-tracked Gardasil by presenting misleading data to the FDA and fabricating a health crisis. They claimed they were ‘filling an unmet medical’ need but in reality, the only thing Merck was interested in filling was the $6 billion financial hole created by the Vioxx scandal.”
The list of Gardasil victims continues to grow
Other Gardasil victims have similar stories. A 25-year-old former athlete, Jennifer Robi, is now confined to a wheelchair after getting the shot. She got the first one when she was 16, and like Otto, she was also diagnosed with POTS as a result.
Her attorneys say that an adjuvant in the vaccine, amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate, is behind the problem because it can overstimulate people’s immune systems to the point where they start attacking their own organs.
Another victim, Colton Berrett, got his first shot at age 13 before leaving for a Boy Scouts camp on the advice of his doctor in 2014. Just two weeks after getting his third dose, his arms and hands became paralyzed; the paralysis eventually spread to leave him completely paralyzed from the neck down and dependent on a ventilator. In 2018, he removed himself from his ventilator.
Gardasil is often thought of as being for girls given that its stated purpose is preventing cervical cancer. However, Otto’s attorneys claim Merck has been making billions by marketing the shot to the parents of young men and boys, claiming that it is safe and effective despite being neither. Moreover, they allege the company knew about the potential for serious health problems.
In a press release, Otto said: “My life is a constant battle between attempting to improve my life and being held back by my own body’s limitations. Gardasil has turned my body into a prison, an anchor that won’t afford me the ability to live an independent life and one that significantly restricts my ability to grow as a person.”
A lot of parents fail to realize that Merck has never proven Gardasil can prevent cervical cancer or any other type of cancer. In clinical trials, they did not use a true placebo to help mask dangerous side effects. Unfortunately, many Big Pharma firms use this and similar tactics to make dangerous products appear safe and rake in the profits at the expense of public health.
Sources for this article include:
ChildrensHealthDefense.org
PRNewswire.com
Rushed with no regards for safety codes and lavishly funded — just like the vaccine itself. Listeners send building plans and documents of the coming mass vaccination program — the final solution of #OperationWarpSpeed


newswars--2020-09-22--Prof Under Investigation for Calling COVID-19 the ‘Chinese Virus’

University of Cincinnati Professor John Ucker has garnered negative attention on social media after one of his students posted a screenshot of an email that was allegedly sent by Ucker .
The university required Sotzing to quarantine for fourteen days after his girlfriend had tested positive for COVID-19 , even though his test came back negative .
During the time that Evan Sotzing would have to be quarantined , he wouldn ’ t be able to attend an in-person lab for a class that Ucker teaches .
Sotzing emailed Ucker explaining the situation and his inability to attend the scheduled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t respond until after the in-person lab had already occurred .
Sotzing then tweeted a picture of Ucker ’ s response , which has now gone viral .
“ My girlfriend tested positive for COVID and the University of Cincinnati ’ s Health Department instructed me to not attend my in-person lab .
Not only did my professor give me a zero for not going , but this was his response , ” Sotzing tweeted .
According to Sotzing ’ s screenshot , Ucker ’ s email stated , “ For students testing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will give no grade .
You can read the info I sent to the class re : the torsion test.
” Sotzing commented on the incident stating , “ I don ’ t want to infect anyone else , if I do have it , but I also don ’ t want to fail school.
” Sotzing has since stated that he wants an apology from Ucker not for giving him a zero on the assignment but for calling COVID-19 the “ Chinese virus.
” The student says that it was “ xenophobic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to use the term , “ Chinese virus.
” Dean of Engineering and Applied Science John Weidner said the school is now “ looking into ” the incident of Ucker saying “ Chinese virus.
” Weidner stated , “ These types of xenophobic comments and stigmatizations around location or ethnicity are more than troubling .
We can better protect and care for all when we speak about COVID-19 with both accuracy and empathy – something we should all strive for.
” The investigation has since been turned over to the Office of Equal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have been sent to Stozing , Ucker , Weidner , the Office of Equal Opportunity and Access , and UC .
Campus Reform has not received any responses .
As the Democrat Party ’ s attempt to steal the 2020 election draws closer and becomes more apparent , Roger Stone believes the time is now for preparatory actions to verify and protect the election outcome .

University of Cincinnati Professor John Ucker has garnered negative attention on social media after one of his students posted a screenshot of an email that was allegedly sent by Ucker.
The university required Sotzing to quarantine for fourteen days after his girlfriend had tested positive for COVID-19, even though his test came back negative.
During the time that Evan Sotzing would have to be quarantined, he wouldn’t be able to attend an in-person lab for a class that Ucker teaches. Sotzing emailed Ucker explaining the situation and his inability to attend the scheduled lab, to which Ucker didn’t respond until after the in-person lab had already occurred. Sotzing then tweeted a picture of Ucker’s response, which has now gone viral.
“My girlfriend tested positive for COVID and the University of Cincinnati’s Health Department instructed me to not attend my in-person lab. Not only did my professor give me a zero for not going, but this was his response,” Sotzing tweeted. According to Sotzing’s screenshot, Ucker’s email stated, “For students testing positive for the Chinese virus, I will give no grade. You can read the info I sent to the class re: the torsion test.”
My girlfriend tested positive for COVID and the University of Cincinnati’s Health Department instructed me to not attend my in-person lab. Not only did my professor give me a zero for not going, but this was his response: pic.twitter.com/WYlbi5apdi — lil sauce (@_Sotzingg_) September 17, 2020 Get back in the game, jump on our major sale at the store now!
Sotzing commented on the incident stating, “I don’t want to infect anyone else, if I do have it, but I also don’t want to fail school.”
Sotzing has since stated that he wants an apology from Ucker not for giving him a zero on the assignment but for calling COVID-19 the “Chinese virus.” The student says that it was “xenophobic” and “racist” for Ucker to use the term, “Chinese virus.”
Dean of Engineering and Applied Science John Weidner said the school is now “looking into” the incident of Ucker saying “Chinese virus.”
Weidner stated, “These types of xenophobic comments and stigmatizations around location or ethnicity are more than troubling. We can better protect and care for all when we speak about COVID-19 with both accuracy and empathy – something we should all strive for.”
The investigation has since been turned over to the Office of Equal Opportunity and Access.
Requests for comment have been sent to Stozing, Ucker, Weidner, the Office of Equal Opportunity and Access, and UC.
Campus Reform has not received any responses.
As the Democrat Party’s attempt to steal the 2020 election draws closer and becomes more apparent, Roger Stone believes the time is now for preparatory actions to verify and protect the election outcome.


newswars--2020-09-22--NYPD Officer Charged With Spying for China

US federal prosecutors on Monday charged a New York City police officer with spying on members of the Tibetan community for the Chinese government .
Baimadajie A. , 33 , who is also a Staff Sergeant in the US Army Reserve , was arrested at his Long Island home for acting as an illegal agent of China .
He was also charged with wire fraud and making false statements .
“ This is the definition of an insider threat , ” said FBI Assistant Director-in-Charge of the New York Field Office William F. Sweeney , in a statement .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ foreign governments from infiltrating our institutions , and we will we not tolerate the behavior of those who willingly violate their oath to the United States , and covertly work against their fellow citizens.
” Prosecutors said the accused , a naturalized US citizen who was born in Tibet , had acted as an agent for Beijing since at least 2014 .
“ As alleged , A. operated on behalf of a foreign government ; lied to gain his clearance , and used his position as an NYPD police officer to aid the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ attempts to recruit intelligence sources , ” said Sweeney .
The criminal complaint also says he secretly worked for unnamed handlers from the Chinese consulate in New York .
He allegedly told his handler that he wanted to get promoted in the NYPD in order to help bring “ glory to China.
” In a statement on Tuesday , the Chinese Consulate General in New York said its staff had been “ fullfilling duties in accordance with international law and the law of the United States , ” calling their work “ above @ @ @ @ @ @ @ allegedly looked for potential intelligence sources within the Tibetan community between 2018 and 2020 , and provided Chinese officials with access to senior NYPD officers through invitations to events .
“ When the Consulate extends a helping hand to them [ Tibetans ] , they will feel the warmth of the motherland .
How wonderful would that be ?
” he allegedly told his handler , in a recorded phone call .
According to the court documents , he also asked whether a Chinese official wanted to attend NYPD events to raise China @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is also “ believed to have been assigned to the ‘ China Association for Preservation and Development of Tibetan Culture , ’ a division of the PRC ’ s United Front Work Department.
” Chinese Communists invaded the small , mainly-Buddhist country of Tibet in 1950 , claiming sovereignty over the Himalayan region .
Most Tibetans maintain that their allegiance lies with the self-exiled spiritual leader , the Dalai Lama .
As the Democrat Party ’ s attempt to steal the 2020 election draws closer and becomes more apparent , Roger Stone believes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to verify and protect the election outcome .

US federal prosecutors on Monday charged a New York City police officer with spying on members of the Tibetan community for the Chinese government.
Baimadajie A., 33, who is also a Staff Sergeant in the US Army Reserve, was arrested at his Long Island home for acting as an illegal agent of China. He was also charged with wire fraud and making false statements.
“This is the definition of an insider threat,” said FBI Assistant Director-in-Charge of the New York Field Office William F. Sweeney, in a statement. “The FBI is committed to stopping hostile foreign governments from infiltrating our institutions, and we will we not tolerate the behavior of those who willingly violate their oath to the United States, and covertly work against their fellow citizens.”
Prosecutors said the accused, a naturalized US citizen who was born in Tibet, had acted as an agent for Beijing since at least 2014.
“As alleged, A. operated on behalf of a foreign government; lied to gain his clearance, and used his position as an NYPD police officer to aid the Chinese government’s subversive and illegal attempts to recruit intelligence sources,” said Sweeney.
The criminal complaint also says he secretly worked for unnamed handlers from the Chinese consulate in New York. He allegedly told his handler that he wanted to get promoted in the NYPD in order to help bring “glory to China.”
In a statement on Tuesday, the Chinese Consulate General in New York said its staff had been “fullfilling duties in accordance with international law and the law of the United States,” calling their work “above board and beyond reproach.”
‘The warmth of the motherland’
The accused allegedly looked for potential intelligence sources within the Tibetan community between 2018 and 2020, and provided Chinese officials with access to senior NYPD officers through invitations to events.
“When the Consulate extends a helping hand to them [Tibetans], they will feel the warmth of the motherland. How wonderful would that be?” he allegedly told his handler, in a recorded phone call.
According to the court documents, he also asked whether a Chinese official wanted to attend NYPD events to raise China’s “soft power.”
He is also “believed to have been assigned to the ‘China Association for Preservation and Development of Tibetan Culture,’ a division of the PRC’s United Front Work Department.”
Chinese Communists invaded the small, mainly-Buddhist country of Tibet in 1950, claiming sovereignty over the Himalayan region. Most Tibetans maintain that their allegiance lies with the self-exiled spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama.
As the Democrat Party’s attempt to steal the 2020 election draws closer and becomes more apparent, Roger Stone believes the time is now for preparatory actions to verify and protect the election outcome.


newswars--2020-09-22--Louisville Police Declare State of Emergency Ahead of Breonna Taylor Announcement

Police in Louisville , Kentucky have declared a state of emergency and two federal buildings have temporarily shuttered ahead of the state attorney general ’ s announcement in the Breonna Taylor case , anticipating possible riots .
The emergency announcement was issued on Monday afternoon by interim Louisville Metropolitan Police Department Chief Robert Schroeder , citing the need for “ appropriate level of staffing to provide for public safety services.
” In practice this translates into all leave and vacation requests being placed on hold .
The US district courthouse in Louisville and the nearby US Citizenship and Immigration Services @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the rest of the week , per orders from a federal judge .
Both federal and local authorities seem to be preparing for the impending announcement by Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron in the case of Breonna Taylor , an emergency medical technician killed in March .
Taylor , 26 , was fatally shot by police attempting to conduct a “ no-knock ” drug warrant , after her boyfriend opened fire on officers , believing them to be intruders .
Black Lives Matter and other protesters have been calling for the arrests @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
One of the officers was fired in June for “ extreme indifference to the value of human life ” and violating department procedures .
Last week , Louisville agreed to pay Taylor ’ s family a $ 12 million settlement and implement a series of police reforms .
The city has already outlawed no-knock warrants as well .
Protesters have denounced the settlement as the “ bare minimum ” and insisted that only indictments will provide true justice .
As the Democrat Party ’ s attempt to steal the 2020 election draws @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Stone believes the time is now for preparatory actions to verify and protect the election outcome .

Police in Louisville, Kentucky have declared a state of emergency and two federal buildings have temporarily shuttered ahead of the state attorney general’s announcement in the Breonna Taylor case, anticipating possible riots.
The emergency announcement was issued on Monday afternoon by interim Louisville Metropolitan Police Department Chief Robert Schroeder, citing the need for “appropriate level of staffing to provide for public safety services.” In practice this translates into all leave and vacation requests being placed on hold.
The US district courthouse in Louisville and the nearby US Citizenship and Immigration Services field office were also shuttered on Monday for the rest of the week, per orders from a federal judge.
Both federal and local authorities seem to be preparing for the impending announcement by Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron in the case of Breonna Taylor, an emergency medical technician killed in March.
Taylor, 26, was fatally shot by police attempting to conduct a “no-knock” drug warrant, after her boyfriend opened fire on officers, believing them to be intruders. Black Lives Matter and other protesters have been calling for the arrests and indictments of the three officers involved.
One of the officers was fired in June for “extreme indifference to the value of human life” and violating department procedures. Last week, Louisville agreed to pay Taylor’s family a $12 million settlement and implement a series of police reforms. The city has already outlawed no-knock warrants as well.
Protesters have denounced the settlement as the “bare minimum” and insisted that only indictments will provide true justice.
As the Democrat Party’s attempt to steal the 2020 election draws closer and becomes more apparent, Roger Stone believes the time is now for preparatory actions to verify and protect the election outcome.


newswars--2020-09-22--Romney Agrees to Back Trump On SCOTUS Pick

Utah Senator Mitt Romney ( R ) announced on Tuesday that he would support a floor vote on President Trump ’ s Supreme Court pick – giving Majority Leader Mitch McConnell ( R-KY ) a 53-seat majority and the votes needed to move forward in replacing the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg , according to Politico .
“ I intend to follow the Constitution and precedent in considering the president ’ s nominee .
If the nominee reaches the Senate floor , I intend to vote based upon their qualifications , ” Romney said in a statement .
Romney said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ making his decision rather than taking a position based on the recent blockade of President Obama ’ s Supreme Court nominee , Merrick Garland , during the 2016 election .
Romney said the “ historical precedent of election year nominations is that the Senate generally does not confirm an opposing party ’ s nominee but does confirm a nominee of its own.
” He added that his decision is “ not the result of a subjective test of ‘ fairness ’ which , like beauty , is in the eye of the beholder @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fairness of following the law , which in this case is the Constitution and precedent.
” – Politico Another potential swing vote who recently committed to Trump ’ s Supreme Court nominee is Sen. Cory Gardner ( R-CO ) , while Sens .
Lisa Murkowski ( R-AK ) and Susan Collins ( R-ME ) say they won ’ t support a nominee this close to the election .
As the Democrat Party ’ s attempt to steal the 2020 election draws closer and becomes more apparent , Roger Stone believes the time is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ protect the election outcome .

Utah Senator Mitt Romney (R) announced on Tuesday that he would support a floor vote on President Trump’s Supreme Court pick – giving Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) a 53-seat majority and the votes needed to move forward in replacing the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, according to Politico.
“I intend to follow the Constitution and precedent in considering the president’s nominee. If the nominee reaches the Senate floor, I intend to vote based upon their qualifications,” Romney said in a statement.
Romney said he was merely following the law in making his decision rather than taking a position based on the recent blockade of President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, Merrick Garland, during the 2016 election. Romney said the “historical precedent of election year nominations is that the Senate generally does not confirm an opposing party’s nominee but does confirm a nominee of its own.”
He added that his decision is “not the result of a subjective test of ‘fairness’ which, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. It is based on the immutable fairness of following the law, which in this case is the Constitution and precedent.” – Politico
My statement regarding the current Supreme Court vacancy: pic.twitter.com/6YO0dPWWXc — Senator Mitt Romney (@SenatorRomney) September 22, 2020
Another potential swing vote who recently committed to Trump’s Supreme Court nominee is Sen. Cory Gardner (R-CO), while Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and Susan Collins (R-ME) say they won’t support a nominee this close to the election.
As the Democrat Party’s attempt to steal the 2020 election draws closer and becomes more apparent, Roger Stone believes the time is now for preparatory actions to verify and protect the election outcome.


newswars--2020-09-22--Biden Says Voters Don’t Need to Know Who His SCOTUS Pick Will Be

Joe Biden says that voters don ’ t have the right to know who his Supreme Court nomination will be until after he wins the presidency .
The exchange happened during a campaign stop earlier today when Biden accused Donald Trump of trying to change the subject by focusing on who the former Vice President would pick to replace the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg .
“ Should voters know who you ’ re going to appoint ?
” Biden was asked .
“ No they don ’ t but they will if I ’ m elected , they ’ ll @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he responded .
The remark is likely to prompt a wave of criticism given that the identity of any potential nominee will become a defining factor of the last 6 weeks of the election cycle .
Meanwhile , President Trump announced that he would be announcing the name of his candidate on Saturday .
“ I will be announcing my Supreme Court Nominee on Saturday , at the White House !
Exact time TBA , ” he tweeted .
Trump ’ s shortlist has been reduced to five , with the favorite being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be seen as the least controversial .
Democrats are desperate to delay the nomination until after the presidential election in November .
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch .
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here .
Also , I urgently need your financial support here .

Joe Biden says that voters don’t have the right to know who his Supreme Court nomination will be until after he wins the presidency.
The exchange happened during a campaign stop earlier today when Biden accused Donald Trump of trying to change the subject by focusing on who the former Vice President would pick to replace the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
“Should voters know who you’re going to appoint?” Biden was asked.
“No they don’t but they will if I’m elected, they’ll know in plenty of time,” he responded.
Asked if voters have a right to know before the election who he would nominate to SCOTUS, Biden says, “No, they don’t.” pic.twitter.com/VkXUnjWzBM — Arthur Schwartz (@ArthurSchwartz) September 22, 2020
The remark is likely to prompt a wave of criticism given that the identity of any potential nominee will become a defining factor of the last 6 weeks of the election cycle.
Meanwhile, President Trump announced that he would be announcing the name of his candidate on Saturday.
“I will be announcing my Supreme Court Nominee on Saturday, at the White House! Exact time TBA,” he tweeted.
I will be announcing my Supreme Court Nominee on Saturday, at the White House! Exact time TBA. — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 22, 2020
Trump’s shortlist has been reduced to five, with the favorite being Amy Coney Barrett since her nomination would be seen as the least controversial.
Democrats are desperate to delay the nomination until after the presidential election in November.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Also, I urgently need your financial support here.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-09-22--Military Generals Are Just Another Group of Self-Interested Technocrats

The United States has always had a love affair with certain generals .
George Washington , of course , was immensely popular , and thirteen US presidents were generals before they were president .
But prior to the Second World War , generals as a group were not revered or treated with any particular veneration or respect .
In fact , in the nineteenth century , full-time US military officers were often treated with suspicion and contempt .
While state militia officers were regarded as indispensable night watchmen who preserved order , the full-time government employees who served in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and otherwise unemployable .
But now those days are long gone .
In recent decades , active generals and retired generals have grown into a group of politically influential technocrats who can be regularly seen on evening news programs and are habitually feted and promoted as incorruptible patriots .
They are fawned over by media organizations while being paid enormous pensions .
Moreover , upon retirement they are able to turn their former government employment into lucrative positions on corporate boards and throughout the private sector .
The immense deference and trust placed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these men is far beyond what is warranted .
Like all technocrats—whether we ’ re talking Supreme Court justices or public health bureaucrats—the generals have their own interests and their own agendas .
This was recently highlighted by the president ’ s new public feud with some generals .
At a Labor Day press conference Trump averred : “ The top people in the Pentagon probably aren ’ t , because they want to do nothing but fight wars so that all of those wonderful companies that make the bombs and make the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” It ’ s always difficult to guess Trump ’ s motivations and earnestness when he makes statements such as this , but the statement itself isn ’ t wrong .
The generals—retired and not— are often deeply enmeshed with weapons manufacturers and tech firms that rely on Pentagon spending .
It ’ s difficult to see why the nation ’ s generals enjoy such a stellar reputation .
The US military establishment has lost every major military endeavor since 1945 and has been shown to be fiscally inept at a level that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The Pentagon has repeatedly failed audits and has “ misplaced ” trillions of taxpayer dollars .
Yet in spite of this impressive record of failure and incompetence , generals continue to be held up by pundits and media organizations as the men who somehow care more about America than anyone else .
Moreover , as is typical for technocrats , the generals are used by the establishment to provide intellectual and ideological cover to those who wish to forever expand US military adventurism and intervention .
The alleged expertise of the generals—although @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said to offer us great insight into how American foreign policy ought to be conducted today .
The Generals Are Hardly Objective , Unbiased Observers Needless to say , this view of the generals veers far from the reality .
Moreover , the generals may now be morally and ideologically compromised by their deep ties to weapons manufacturers and the corporate boards on which many generals serve .
In a blistering article published at the American Conservative last week , Hunter Derensis explains how the image of American generals as selfless public servants @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Perhaps Trump learned the hard way that the generals of the forever wars don ’ t measure up to the twentieth-century soldiers he adulated growing up .
For instance , when George Marshall oversaw the deployment of 8.3 million GIs across four continents in World War II , he did so with the assistance of only three other four-star generals .
In retirement , Marshall refused to sit on any corporate boards , and passed on multiple lucrative book deals , lest he give the impression that he was profiting from his military @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , “ he had not spent his life serving the government in order to sell his life story to the Saturday Evening Post.
” Contrast that to the bloated , top-heavy military establishment of today , where an unprecedented forty-one four-star generals oversee only 1.3 million men [ - ] and women-at-arms .
These men , selected and groomed because of their safe habits , spend years patting themselves on the back for managing wars-not-won , awaiting the day they can cash in .
According to an analysis by The Boston Globe , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ three- and four-star generals went on to work as consultants or executives for the arms industry .
In 2006 , at the height of the Iraq War , that number swelled to over 80 % of retirees .
The examples are as endless as America ’ s foreign occupations : former Director of Naval Intelligence Jack Dorsett joined the board of Northrop-Grumman ; he was later followed by former Air Force Chief of Staff Mark Welsh ; meanwhile , former Vice Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff James Cartwright went to Raytheon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ highest ranking position in the military—William J. Crowe , John Shalikashvili , Richard Myers , and Joseph Dunford went on to work for General Dynamics , Boeing , Northrop-Grumman , and Lockheed-Martin , respectively .
Just as former presidents are able to turn their fame into multimillion dollar fortunes ( as the Obamas and Clintons have done ) generals are able to engage in very similar activities .
Derensis continues : General James “ Mad Dog ” Mattis , in between his forced retirement from the Marine Corps and appointment as Secretary of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dynamics where he was paid over a million dollars in salary and benefits .
Returning to public life , Mattis then spent two years cajoling President Trump into keeping the U.S. military engaged in places as disparate as Afghanistan , Syria , and Africa .
“ Sir , we ’ re doing it to prevent a bomb from going off in Times Square , ” Mattis told his commander-in-chief .
Left unsaid was that a strategic withdrawal would also lead to a precipitous decline in Mattis ’ future stock options , which he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his December 2018 resignation .
None of this proves generals are all amoral cynics , of course .
It is quite possible to want a safe and prosperous America while also being an opportunist who ’ s always on the lookout for new ways to turn one ’ s life of living off the sweat of the taxpayer into some additional easy cash .
But what this all shows us is that it ’ s time to start viewing the generals for what they are : lifelong bureaucrats who upon retirement are more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaunted experience in government as a means to fame , adulation , and easy money .
After all , in the modern world , generals don ’ t become generals through courage on the battlefield , or even through any particularly insightful thinking or expertise .
It ’ s not 1944 , and these guys aren ’ t exactly George S. Patton .
Today ’ s generals are politicos , bureaucrats , and Washington insiders whose primary skill set lies in gaining influence in the halls of Congress and on cable TV shows @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rewarding work .
If you can get it .
Our political climate has levied a lopsided justice system to the point that Jake Gardner , a Nebraska bar owner chose to commit suicide rather than face prison for defending his life , liberty , and property .

The United States has always had a love affair with certain generals.
George Washington, of course, was immensely popular, and thirteen US presidents were generals before they were president.
But prior to the Second World War, generals as a group were not revered or treated with any particular veneration or respect. In fact, in the nineteenth century, full-time US military officers were often treated with suspicion and contempt. While state militia officers were regarded as indispensable night watchmen who preserved order, the full-time government employees who served in the federal military were often derided as lazy and otherwise unemployable.
But now those days are long gone. In recent decades, active generals and retired generals have grown into a group of politically influential technocrats who can be regularly seen on evening news programs and are habitually feted and promoted as incorruptible patriots. They are fawned over by media organizations while being paid enormous pensions. Moreover, upon retirement they are able to turn their former government employment into lucrative positions on corporate boards and throughout the private sector.
The immense deference and trust placed in the opinions and alleged expertise of these men is far beyond what is warranted. Like all technocrats—whether we’re talking Supreme Court justices or public health bureaucrats—the generals have their own interests and their own agendas. This was recently highlighted by the president’s new public feud with some generals. At a Labor Day press conference Trump averred: “The top people in the Pentagon probably aren’t, because they want to do nothing but fight wars so that all of those wonderful companies that make the bombs and make the planes and make everything else stay happy.” It’s always difficult to guess Trump’s motivations and earnestness when he makes statements such as this, but the statement itself isn’t wrong. The generals—retired and not— are often deeply enmeshed with weapons manufacturers and tech firms that rely on Pentagon spending.
The Generals’ Unimpressive Record
It’s difficult to see why the nation’s generals enjoy such a stellar reputation. The US military establishment has lost every major military endeavor since 1945 and has been shown to be fiscally inept at a level that could only be described as criminal indifference. The Pentagon has repeatedly failed audits and has “misplaced” trillions of taxpayer dollars.
Yet in spite of this impressive record of failure and incompetence, generals continue to be held up by pundits and media organizations as the men who somehow care more about America than anyone else. Moreover, as is typical for technocrats, the generals are used by the establishment to provide intellectual and ideological cover to those who wish to forever expand US military adventurism and intervention. The alleged expertise of the generals—although apparently insufficient to actually win any wars—is said to offer us great insight into how American foreign policy ought to be conducted today.
The Generals Are Hardly Objective, Unbiased Observers
Needless to say, this view of the generals veers far from the reality. Moreover, the generals may now be morally and ideologically compromised by their deep ties to weapons manufacturers and the corporate boards on which many generals serve.
In a blistering article published at the American Conservative last week, Hunter Derensis explains how the image of American generals as selfless public servants is long past its expiration date:
Perhaps Trump learned the hard way that the generals of the forever wars don’t measure up to the twentieth-century soldiers he adulated growing up.
For instance, when George Marshall oversaw the deployment of 8.3 million GIs across four continents in World War II, he did so with the assistance of only three other four-star generals. In retirement, Marshall refused to sit on any corporate boards, and passed on multiple lucrative book deals, lest he give the impression that he was profiting from his military record. As he told one publisher, “he had not spent his life serving the government in order to sell his life story to the Saturday Evening Post.”
Contrast that to the bloated, top-heavy military establishment of today, where an unprecedented forty-one four-star generals oversee only 1.3 million men[-] and women-at-arms. These men, selected and groomed because of their safe habits, spend years patting themselves on the back for managing wars-not-won, awaiting the day they can cash in. According to an analysis by The Boston Globe, in the mid-1990s nearly 50% of three- and four-star generals went on to work as consultants or executives for the arms industry. In 2006, at the height of the Iraq War, that number swelled to over 80% of retirees.
The examples are as endless as America’s foreign occupations: former Director of Naval Intelligence Jack Dorsett joined the board of Northrop-Grumman; he was later followed by former Air Force Chief of Staff Mark Welsh; meanwhile, former Vice Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff James Cartwright went to Raytheon; former Chairs of the Joint Chiefs—the highest ranking position in the military—William J. Crowe, John Shalikashvili, Richard Myers, and Joseph Dunford went on to work for General Dynamics, Boeing, Northrop-Grumman, and Lockheed-Martin, respectively.
Just as former presidents are able to turn their fame into multimillion dollar fortunes (as the Obamas and Clintons have done) generals are able to engage in very similar activities. Derensis continues:
General James “Mad Dog” Mattis, in between his forced retirement from the Marine Corps and appointment as Secretary of Defense, joined the board of General Dynamics where he was paid over a million dollars in salary and benefits. Returning to public life, Mattis then spent two years cajoling President Trump into keeping the U.S. military engaged in places as disparate as Afghanistan, Syria, and Africa. “Sir, we’re doing it to prevent a bomb from going off in Times Square,” Mattis told his commander-in-chief. Left unsaid was that a strategic withdrawal would also lead to a precipitous decline in Mattis’ future stock options, which he regained after he rejoined General Dynamics following his December 2018 resignation.
None of this proves generals are all amoral cynics, of course. It is quite possible to want a safe and prosperous America while also being an opportunist who’s always on the lookout for new ways to turn one’s life of living off the sweat of the taxpayer into some additional easy cash.
But what this all shows us is that it’s time to start viewing the generals for what they are: lifelong bureaucrats who upon retirement are more than happy to use their easy and vaunted experience in government as a means to fame, adulation, and easy money. After all, in the modern world, generals don’t become generals through courage on the battlefield, or even through any particularly insightful thinking or expertise. It’s not 1944, and these guys aren’t exactly George S. Patton.
Today’s generals are politicos, bureaucrats, and Washington insiders whose primary skill set lies in gaining influence in the halls of Congress and on cable TV shows. It’s very easy and rewarding work. If you can get it.
Our political climate has levied a lopsided justice system to the point that Jake Gardner, a Nebraska bar owner chose to commit suicide rather than face prison for defending his life, liberty, and property.


newswars--2020-09-22--Why They Want to Destroy Julian Assange

Why They Want to Destroy Julian Assange

Julian Assange ’ s heroic but tragic life is coming to a head in the next weeks .
A British court shall soon rule whether Assange , ostensibly a publisher and journalist , shall be extradited to the United States to be charged with espionage .
Though many people around the world have followed Assange ’ s hardships on and off during the last decade , it is really now , during this sham trial in London , that the importance of the struggle for political freedom should become clear to all .
In the widest sense , political freedom @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coercion .
Granted the existence of a state , however small , political freedom is therefore never complete .
And it can never be taken for granted ; political freedom must always be fought for , if only to hang on to the gains of the past .
Though there is more political freedom in the West today than when Bertrand Russell was locked up for opposing conscription during World War I , the state still has no qualms about trampling on individual rights when it deems that its interests are at stake @ @ @ @ @ @ @ incarcerated , and tortured .
The right to privacy of millions of ordinary people has been violated through secret , illegal surveillance programs conducted by intelligence agencies , some of which have been disclosed by Assange and the sources he worked with .
Although Assange is not exactly a libertarian , he acts upon the libertarian idea that the state shall have no secrets from the people .
In his words , “ transparency and accountability [ of the state ] are moral issues.
” It is the moral principle that the people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their state servants say , write , and do ; especially when they commit acts that are illegal under the state ’ s own legal system .
Of course , this point becomes more relevant as the State grows in size and scope ; if it were cut down to a night watchman state , there would be far less to know .
The public acceptance of the state ’ s oversized role in society has been achieved over generations through the public education system and an obedient mainstream media .
It has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( or actual violence if needed , as in the case of Assange ) in order to deal with serious dissenters .
The state requires a compliant public opinion in order to rule and will therefore not tolerate anyone who might weaken the people ’ s tacit acceptance of a state with fingers in all pies .
Since the rise of the modern state , many so-called enemies of the state have been at the receiving end of its power , from Voltaire and Emma Goldman to Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is difficult because of the seriousness of the challenge , as Julian Assange is experiencing now .
When this struggle starts yielding results it entails immediate dangers , because the state , like any organism , will defend itself ; it can not accept successful attempts to undermine its legitimacy , to curtail its power , to make it accountable , or to expose its secrets .
It will start by trying to dissuade and , often successfully , dangle benefits to sway the less determined .
If that doesn ’ t work @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , in true mafia style , and can then decide to ruin careers , imprison , and finally resort to murder if that is required to remove a serious threat .
This is what is happening to Julian Assange , as to many before him .
Ironically , the unacceptable treatment of Assange confirms the abhorrent nature of the state .
The US government perceives Assange as a serious threat , because he has successfully helped expose its crimes and could continue to do so unless he is stopped .
Thanks to Wikileaks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ public now knows about the US military ’ s war crimes , the CIA ’ s mass surveillance program ( Vault7 ) , US political corruption ( DNC email archive ) , and many other illegal acts committed by the state apparatus .
Because all such crimes have to be kept secret in order to maintain the illusion of the state ’ s benevolence , the US government has decided to punish Assange for exposing them , thus also deterring others from emulating him .
This frontal attack on Assange by Washington , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deleterious character of the US federal government .
European states are far from innocent but behave better in our time because they are more internally and externally circumscribed .
Despite this , or because of it , Britain—and Europe—is incapable or unwilling to stand up to the United States , even if it means sacrificing its most fundamental principles as it does its bidding .
As John Pilger wrote , “ the land that gave us Magna Carta , Great Britain , is distinguished by the abandonment of its own sovereignty in allowing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” The US , in collaboration with the UK and the mostly complicit mainstream media , sees Assange as an enemy that needs to be neutralized , even if that means openly going against the fundamental principles of rule of law that this state has publicly pretended to abide by for so long .
The most important of these principles , freedom of speech and of the press , is , of course , supposedly protected by the First Amendment to the US Constitution .
Yet the fact that the US and UK @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rights in plain daylight is a real risk to their reputation and thus also a sign of desperation .
Though the US government has not won this battle yet , Assange ’ s future looks quite bleak despite the support he is getting from many well-known institutions .
But , in the long term , his very public case may likely help the cause of political freedom in the West .
His fate at the hands of the state for publishing truthful information about its illegal and immoral behavior may finally make more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s activities , concealed or not , are fundamentally antagonistic to their interests .
Though the general population can not be expected to defend political freedom like Julian Assange has , his case might help wake them from their political slumber , for , as George Santayana wrote : Unless all those concerned keep a vigilant eye on the course of public business and frequently pronounce on its conduct , they will before long awake to the fact that they have been ignored and enslaved .
The trial of Julian Assange will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the man himself .
Whatever will be Assange ’ s future , he is already one more martyr in the historic struggle for political freedom from which everyone can take inspiration .
Our political climate has levied a lopsided justice system to the point that Jake Gardner , a Nebraska bar owner chose to commit suicide rather than face prison for defending his life , liberty , and property .

Julian Assange’s heroic but tragic life is coming to a head in the next weeks. A British court shall soon rule whether Assange, ostensibly a publisher and journalist, shall be extradited to the United States to be charged with espionage.
Though many people around the world have followed Assange’s hardships on and off during the last decade, it is really now, during this sham trial in London, that the importance of the struggle for political freedom should become clear to all.
In the widest sense, political freedom can be defined as freedom from state coercion. Granted the existence of a state, however small, political freedom is therefore never complete. And it can never be taken for granted; political freedom must always be fought for, if only to hang on to the gains of the past. Though there is more political freedom in the West today than when Bertrand Russell was locked up for opposing conscription during World War I, the state still has no qualms about trampling on individual rights when it deems that its interests are at stake. Assange has been spied upon, incarcerated, and tortured. The right to privacy of millions of ordinary people has been violated through secret, illegal surveillance programs conducted by intelligence agencies, some of which have been disclosed by Assange and the sources he worked with.
Although Assange is not exactly a libertarian, he acts upon the libertarian idea that the state shall have no secrets from the people. In his words, “transparency and accountability [of the state] are moral issues.” It is the moral principle that the people have a right to know everything that their state servants say, write, and do; especially when they commit acts that are illegal under the state’s own legal system. Of course, this point becomes more relevant as the State grows in size and scope; if it were cut down to a night watchman state, there would be far less to know.
The public acceptance of the state’s oversized role in society has been achieved over generations through the public education system and an obedient mainstream media. It has been enforced by the threat of violence (or actual violence if needed, as in the case of Assange) in order to deal with serious dissenters. The state requires a compliant public opinion in order to rule and will therefore not tolerate anyone who might weaken the people’s tacit acceptance of a state with fingers in all pies.
Since the rise of the modern state, many so-called enemies of the state have been at the receiving end of its power, from Voltaire and Emma Goldman to Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. The struggle for political freedom is difficult because of the seriousness of the challenge, as Julian Assange is experiencing now. When this struggle starts yielding results it entails immediate dangers, because the state, like any organism, will defend itself; it cannot accept successful attempts to undermine its legitimacy, to curtail its power, to make it accountable, or to expose its secrets. It will start by trying to dissuade and, often successfully, dangle benefits to sway the less determined. If that doesn’t work, the state will warn its victims, in true mafia style, and can then decide to ruin careers, imprison, and finally resort to murder if that is required to remove a serious threat.
This is what is happening to Julian Assange, as to many before him. Ironically, the unacceptable treatment of Assange confirms the abhorrent nature of the state. The US government perceives Assange as a serious threat, because he has successfully helped expose its crimes and could continue to do so unless he is stopped. Thanks to Wikileaks, which Assange has led, the public now knows about the US military’s war crimes, the CIA’s mass surveillance program (Vault7), US political corruption (DNC email archive), and many other illegal acts committed by the state apparatus. Because all such crimes have to be kept secret in order to maintain the illusion of the state’s benevolence, the US government has decided to punish Assange for exposing them, thus also deterring others from emulating him.
This frontal attack on Assange by Washington, DC, confirms the particularly unaccountable and deleterious character of the US federal government. European states are far from innocent but behave better in our time because they are more internally and externally circumscribed. Despite this, or because of it, Britain—and Europe—is incapable or unwilling to stand up to the United States, even if it means sacrificing its most fundamental principles as it does its bidding. As John Pilger wrote, “the land that gave us Magna Carta, Great Britain, is distinguished by the abandonment of its own sovereignty in allowing a malign foreign power to manipulate justice.”
The US, in collaboration with the UK and the mostly complicit mainstream media, sees Assange as an enemy that needs to be neutralized, even if that means openly going against the fundamental principles of rule of law that this state has publicly pretended to abide by for so long. The most important of these principles, freedom of speech and of the press, is, of course, supposedly protected by the First Amendment to the US Constitution. Yet the fact that the US and UK are now flouting Assange’s basic rights in plain daylight is a real risk to their reputation and thus also a sign of desperation.
Though the US government has not won this battle yet, Assange’s future looks quite bleak despite the support he is getting from many well-known institutions. But, in the long term, his very public case may likely help the cause of political freedom in the West. His fate at the hands of the state for publishing truthful information about its illegal and immoral behavior may finally make more people recognize that many of the state’s activities, concealed or not, are fundamentally antagonistic to their interests. Though the general population cannot be expected to defend political freedom like Julian Assange has, his case might help wake them from their political slumber, for, as George Santayana wrote:
Unless all those concerned keep a vigilant eye on the course of public business and frequently pronounce on its conduct, they will before long awake to the fact that they have been ignored and enslaved.
The trial of Julian Assange will have consequences that are far larger than the man himself. Whatever will be Assange’s future, he is already one more martyr in the historic struggle for political freedom from which everyone can take inspiration.
Our political climate has levied a lopsided justice system to the point that Jake Gardner, a Nebraska bar owner chose to commit suicide rather than face prison for defending his life, liberty, and property.


newswars--2020-09-23--Video: Trump Slams China For Having “Unleashed This Plague Onto The World”

In a damning speech to the United Nations Tuesday , President Trump blasted China for covering up the coronavirus outbreak and failing to precent a global pandemic , adding that the World Health Organisation was complicit .
“ As we pursue this bright future , we must hold accountable the nation which unleashed this plague onto the world : China , ” Trump said .
“ The Chinese government and the World Health Organization , which is virtually controlled by China , falsely declared that there was no evidence of human-to-human transmission , ” the President added .
“ Later @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not spread the disease , ” Trump continued , adding that “ The United Nations must hold China accountable for their actions.
” “ We have waged a fierce battle against the invisible enemy — the China virus , ” Trump asserted .
The President further attacked China more broadly , stating that “ Those who attack America ’ s exceptional environmental record while ignoring China ’ s rampant pollution are not interested in the environment .
They only want to punish America .
And I will not stand for it.
” Turning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a vaccine noting , “ We will defeat the virus , and we will end the pandemic and enter a new era of prosperity , cooperation and peace.
” The President also criticised the UN , saying that it needs to concentrate on “ the real problems of the world ” including “ terrorism , the oppression of women , forced labor , drug trafficking , human and sex trafficking , religious persecution , and the ethnic cleansing of religious minorities ” .
China ’ s UN ambassador Zhang Jun later hit back @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is at a crossroads .
At this moment , the world needs more solidarity and cooperation , but not confrontation.
” President Xi Jinping , the Chinese leader , claimed that the country has “ no intention to fight either a cold war or a hot one with any country ” , adding that “ Any attempt of politicizing the issue or stigmatization must be rejected.
” Xi advocated a global solution to the pandemic , via the WHO , proclaiming that “ We will continue to narrow differences and resolve disputes with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will not seek to develop only ourselves or engage in zero sum game .
Unilateralism is dead.
” Xi called for an embracing of globalism , declaring that “ COVID-19 reminds us that we are living in an interconnected global village with a common stake.
” “ Burying one ’ s head in the sand like an ostrich in the face of economic globalization , or trying to fight it with Don Quixote ’ s lance , goes against the trend of history .
Let this be clear : the world will never @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in a blatant advocation of globalism .
The Chinese leader ’ s words are extremely rich , given that China deliberately seized global supply lines for medical supplies and disgustingly profited by not informing the rest of the globe of the extent of the spread of coronavirus back in January .
A US Foreign Affairs Committee report released this week concluded as much , noting that China covered up the coronavirus pandemic , and failed to follow international health guidelines which would have almost certainly prevented the global pandemic .

In a damning speech to the United Nations Tuesday, President Trump blasted China for covering up the coronavirus outbreak and failing to precent a global pandemic, adding that the World Health Organisation was complicit.
“As we pursue this bright future, we must hold accountable the nation which unleashed this plague onto the world: China,” Trump said.
“The Chinese government and the World Health Organization, which is virtually controlled by China, falsely declared that there was no evidence of human-to-human transmission,” the President added.
“Later they falsely said people without symptoms would not spread the disease,” Trump continued, adding that “The United Nations must hold China accountable for their actions.”
“We have waged a fierce battle against the invisible enemy — the China virus,” Trump asserted.
The President further attacked China more broadly, stating that “Those who attack America’s exceptional environmental record while ignoring China’s rampant pollution are not interested in the environment. They only want to punish America. And I will not stand for it.”
Turning to solutions, Trump promised to distribute a vaccine noting, “We will defeat the virus, and we will end the pandemic and enter a new era of prosperity, cooperation and peace.”
The President also criticised the UN, saying that it needs to concentrate on “the real problems of the world” including “terrorism, the oppression of women, forced labor, drug trafficking, human and sex trafficking, religious persecution, and the ethnic cleansing of religious minorities”.
China’s UN ambassador Zhang Jun later hit back at Trump, declaring “The world is at a crossroads. At this moment, the world needs more solidarity and cooperation, but not confrontation.”
President Xi Jinping, the Chinese leader, claimed that the country has “no intention to fight either a cold war or a hot one with any country”, adding that “Any attempt of politicizing the issue or stigmatization must be rejected.”
Xi advocated a global solution to the pandemic, via the WHO, proclaiming that “We will continue to narrow differences and resolve disputes with others through dialogue and negotiation. We will not seek to develop only ourselves or engage in zero sum game. Unilateralism is dead.”
Xi called for an embracing of globalism, declaring that “COVID-19 reminds us that we are living in an interconnected global village with a common stake.”
“Burying one’s head in the sand like an ostrich in the face of economic globalization, or trying to fight it with Don Quixote’s lance, goes against the trend of history. Let this be clear: the world will never return to isolation,” Xi urged in a blatant advocation of globalism.
The Chinese leader’s words are extremely rich, given that China deliberately seized global supply lines for medical supplies and disgustingly profited by not informing the rest of the globe of the extent of the spread of coronavirus back in January.
A US Foreign Affairs Committee report released this week concluded as much, noting that China covered up the coronavirus pandemic, and failed to follow international health guidelines which would have almost certainly prevented the global pandemic.


newswars--2020-09-23--France: Woman Pulls Out Tape Measure to Enforce Social Distancing

A video clip out of France shows a woman in a delicatessen pulling out a tape measure to enforce social distancing .
The footage shows an older woman asking a younger woman in the queue behind her to move back .
She then fishes a tape measure out of bag and extends it out to make her point , before the younger woman moves further away .
The irony of the farce is that in complaining about a lack of social distancing , the older woman is herself violating social distancing by reaching out and almost touching the other woman @ @ @ @ @ @ @ receiving almost 7 million views on Twitter .
This isn ’ t the first time an incident of this nature has been caught on camera .
As we highlighted back in July , another clip showed a woman hysterically screaming at people who had gathered near a lake while being restrained .
The woman screeched “ Fuck you !
Get out of here !
” as she frantically flailed around holding a tape measure .
The intensity of the moral panic surrounding coronavirus that continues to be pumped out by the media is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for many months to come .
As we previously highlighted , polls show that people think COVID-19 has killed far more people than it actually has , with Americans believing the virus has already claimed over 30 million lives .
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch .
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here .
Also , I urgently need your financial support here .

A video clip out of France shows a woman in a delicatessen pulling out a tape measure to enforce social distancing.
Yes, really.
The footage shows an older woman asking a younger woman in the queue behind her to move back.
She then fishes a tape measure out of bag and extends it out to make her point, before the younger woman moves further away.
she didn’t just pull out a tape measure. she pulled out a tape measure ✨ ✨ pic.twitter.com/0BBJZrRcxc — Alex Milsom (@alexmilsom) September 21, 2020
The irony of the farce is that in complaining about a lack of social distancing, the older woman is herself violating social distancing by reaching out and almost touching the other woman.
The clip has gone viral, receiving almost 7 million views on Twitter.
This isn’t the first time an incident of this nature has been caught on camera.
As we highlighted back in July, another clip showed a woman hysterically screaming at people who had gathered near a lake while being restrained.
The woman screeched “Fuck you! Get out of here!” as she frantically flailed around holding a tape measure.
The intensity of the moral panic surrounding coronavirus that continues to be pumped out by the media is going to continue providing moments like this for many months to come.
As we previously highlighted, polls show that people think COVID-19 has killed far more people than it actually has, with Americans believing the virus has already claimed over 30 million lives.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
ALERT!
In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.
I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.
Also, I urgently need your financial support here.
———————————————————————————————————————