newswars--2020-07-08--Bailouts Threatening Economic Growth

Bailouts Threatening Economic Growth

Bailouts are the name of the game right now .
It seems like everybody is in line for a bailout .
Airlines .
Movie theaters .
Small businesses .
Hospitals .
Not to mention the fact that the Federal Reserve has resorted to directly buying corporate debt .
Conventional wisdom tells us this is necessary .
After all , the government shutdown put tremendous stress on businesses .
Doesn ’ t the government have a responsibility to help them out ?
But bailouts don ’ t happen in a vacuum .
The government has a history of bailing out various @ @ @ @ @ @ @ learn from that history .
In an article originally published on the Mises Wire , economist Dr. Klajdi Bregu looks back and offers some poignant warnings for bailout nation .
The following is the opinion of Klajdi Bregu and do not necessarily reflect those of Peter Schiff or SchiffGold .
he recent economic downturn has created the environment for a new round of bailouts by the government and the Fed .
Last time they did this they told us it would be the last one , but anyone who knows our history knew @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Now we are told again that this is an exceptional situation and we must bail out businesses in trouble so that the economy can restart again as quickly as possible .
But this is the same argument the government has always made when pushing for a bailout .
What is more , every time the government has bailed out businesses , they have promised us that this will not create moral hazard .
Moral hazard here refers to the ability to take risk without fear of suffering the consequences .
As I show @ @ @ @ @ @ @ short-term decisions , and when these bad decisions bring them to the brink of bankruptcy , they are bailed out by taxpayers .
So , the owners of these firms and their CEOs benefit from the upside , and taxpayers foot the bill on the downside .
In what follows , I review the history of bailouts in the US and argue that we must consider bringing an end to bailouts if we want to have the real and sustainable economic growth we desperately need .
After the savings and loan ( S @ @ @ @ @ @ @ many years , government finally came to the rescue .
The federal government , at the time under the leadership of President George H.W .
Bush , passed a bailout that cost taxpayers $ 124 billion ( $ 264 billion in today ’ s dollars ) .
It is important for our purpose here to keep in mind that in the lead-up to this many of these firms had taken advantage of the booming housing market .
Many of these companies lent too much money , and when the economy weakened they could @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This led L. William Seidman , former chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ( FDIC ) and the Resolution Trust Corporation , to say that “ The banking problems of the ’ 80s and ’ 90s came primarily , but not exclusively , from unsound real estate lending.
” Hence , these companies were not prudent during the good times and did not plan for a downturn .
This was not the last time financial institutions were bailed out .
Banks , along with the artificially low interest rates , were the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ History repeated itself as the federal government stepped in and bailed them out again .
We were told that the banks and AIG ( American International Group ) were “ too big to fail ” and could not be allowed to go bankrupt because the harm to the economy would be enormous .
These bailouts—for AIG , the banks , Fannie Mae , and Freddie Mac—cost the taxpayers $ 621 billion in today ’ s dollars , or more than twice the previous bailout .
But , aren ’ t the banks stronger @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a fair question , yet the banks would be strong if we let them liquidate the parts of their companies that were hit the most .
Had we done this we would have a stronger banking system and no moral hazard for the rest of the economy .
During the Great Recession the government bailed out the three big automakers in the US .
But this was not the first time the government had bailed out a car company .
Chrysler had already been bailed out in 1979 , when they got @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in today ’ s dollars ) .
It is important to point out why Chrysler had needed to be bailed out .
Charles Hyde , professor of history at Wayne State University and author of Riding the Roller Coaster : A History of the Chrysler Corporation , had this to say : Chrysler emerged stronger after this ; they made the necessary changes , and it seems that at least for a while they did well .
But in 2008 Chrysler and GM both found themselves in trouble .
This time around , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ adjusted for inflation , which is about 17.5 times the previous one .
And , again , we know these firms had made bad decisions ( misallocated resources ) , since Ford and other car companies did not need a bailout .
The concerned reader may ask , Aren ’ t the bailouts the price we have to pay to save jobs ?
The problem is that these companies never really fixed their problems .
While low interest rates have helped them , they have also made them more fragile .
As I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is in an unsustainable bubble , and with sales going down and delinquencies that were already rising , another crash and maybe another round of bailouts seem inevitable .
In fact , the Fed has already implicitly “ bailed out ” Ford by promising to buy the fallen angels ‘ debt .
So , while the bailouts may save some jobs in the short run , they will cause much more trouble in the long run .
Following the attack on 9/11 , airline traffic suffered a big hit and the airline firms @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to survive.
” The government at the time provided $ 5 billion in grants and $ 10 billion in loans ( about $ 22 billion in today ’ s dollars ) .
After the bailout bill was passed President George W. Bush said : But as it turns out , airline companies did not develop very good “ long-term viability plans.
” Recently , the US airlines were hit with the same problem they had after 9/11—a lack of passengers because of the COVID-19 crisis—and they could not have been less prepared for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that had experienced a similar situation not so long ago to be better prepared than others , but they clearly were not .
The government stepped in again and has bailed them out by allocating $ 25 billion in grants ( 30 percent of which will be repaid as a loan over ten years ) and an additional $ 25 billion in loans .
But again one may ask , Doesn ’ t this save jobs ?
The answer to this important question is that this may save some jobs in the short @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will be very high , since these jobs are not sustainable .
What is more , this bailout will lead to lower economic growth , since the necessary resource reallocation will not happen .
Our history of bailouts shows that we have created tremendous moral hazard .
As I have argued above , some industries or firms have been repeatedly bailed out .
Hence , these companies have never learned to be prudent and save for a rainy day , which shows that they are incompetent at best or simply care only for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , for instance .
In the post–Great Recession period , the airline industry used 96 percent of its profits to buy back stocks and did not plan for a downturn .
It is true that it was not easy to predict a situation like the current one caused by COVID-19 , but many would disagree that this was a black swan , including Nassim Taleb himself .
Hence , the bailouts have led to bad use of resources , which can explain , at least in part , the slow economic growth we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with bailouts is that the tradeoffs we face are higher unemployment now followed by higher and sustainable economic growth later , or lower unemployment now followed by lower economic growth later .
Bailouts are directly connected to productivity , as the graph below shows .
This means that the more bailouts we have the lower the economic growth .
This makes sense , since economic theory tells us that when a company fails it means that they were not using resources efficiently .
If the company goes bankrupt , then either some or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to more prudent investors , which will lead to better use of these resources and higher economic growth .
On the other hand , when a company is bailed out , they will continue to make bad decisions and even worse others will get the message that they will not be held responsible by the market if they make bad decisions .
The good news is that some people are starting to speak out against these huge wealth transfers from taxpayers to large corporate shareholders and CEOs .
In a recent interview for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that were not prudent should be left to go bankrupt .
Sadly , many people are convinced that this would lead to massive unemployment , such that we are not bailing out corporations , but are rather helping workers .
That is not quite the real story .
When companies file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy , it is the shareholders and the speculators who get hurt , not the workers .
Yet the federal government and the Fed are doing anything they can to keep the debt bubble going .
This is nothing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Fed have brought us to the current situation in concert .
The Fed ’ s low interest rate policy together with the implicit bailout guarantee from the federal government led corporations to borrow too much .
This has made the economy so fragile that it could not even handle interest rates at half of what they were before the last crisis started .
As the Fed increased interest rates in 2018 , the economy started to slow down so fast that they had to reverse and start lowering interest rates in 2019 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Low interest rates , along with the many programs the Fed has implemented during the COVID-19 crisis , have led corporations to borrow more than $ 617 billion in the last two months alone .
So , the story of bailouts and low interest rates continues .
But until it ends we can not expect to have the real and sustainable economic growth we desperately need .
Alex Jones interviews Roger Stone days before his prison sentence is set to begin as he releases new information in the Ghislaine Maxwell / Jeffrey @ @ @

Bailouts are the name of the game right now. It seems like everybody is in line for a bailout. Airlines. Movie theaters. Small businesses. Hospitals. Not to mention the fact that the Federal Reserve has resorted to directly buying corporate debt.
Conventional wisdom tells us this is necessary. After all, the government shutdown put tremendous stress on businesses. Doesn’t the government have a responsibility to help them out?
But bailouts don’t happen in a vacuum. The government has a history of bailing out various industries and companies, and we can learn from that history. In an article originally published on the Mises Wire, economist Dr. Klajdi Bregu looks back and offers some poignant warnings for bailout nation.
The following is the opinion of Klajdi Bregu and do not necessarily reflect those of Peter Schiff or SchiffGold.
he recent economic downturn has created the environment for a new round of bailouts by the government and the Fed. Last time they did this they told us it would be the last one, but anyone who knows our history knew that was not going to stand. Now we are told again that this is an exceptional situation and we must bail out businesses in trouble so that the economy can restart again as quickly as possible. But this is the same argument the government has always made when pushing for a bailout. What is more, every time the government has bailed out businesses, they have promised us that this will not create moral hazard.
Moral hazard here refers to the ability to take risk without fear of suffering the consequences. As I show below, businesses profit by making bad short-term decisions, and when these bad decisions bring them to the brink of bankruptcy, they are bailed out by taxpayers. So, the owners of these firms and their CEOs benefit from the upside, and taxpayers foot the bill on the downside. In what follows, I review the history of bailouts in the US and argue that we must consider bringing an end to bailouts if we want to have the real and sustainable economic growth we desperately need.
Financial Institutions Bailouts 1.0 and 2.0
After the savings and loan (S&L) industry had struggled for many years, government finally came to the rescue. The federal government, at the time under the leadership of President George H.W. Bush, passed a bailout that cost taxpayers $124 billion ($264 billion in today’s dollars). It is important for our purpose here to keep in mind that in the lead-up to this many of these firms had taken advantage of the booming housing market. Many of these companies lent too much money, and when the economy weakened they could not keep up with the losses. This led L. William Seidman, former chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Resolution Trust Corporation, to say that “The banking problems of the ’80s and ’90s came primarily, but not exclusively, from unsound real estate lending.” Hence, these companies were not prudent during the good times and did not plan for a downturn.
This was not the last time financial institutions were bailed out. Banks, along with the artificially low interest rates, were the main cause of the Great Recession. History repeated itself as the federal government stepped in and bailed them out again. We were told that the banks and AIG (American International Group) were “too big to fail” and could not be allowed to go bankrupt because the harm to the economy would be enormous. These bailouts—for AIG, the banks, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac—cost the taxpayers $621 billion in today’s dollars, or more than twice the previous bailout. But, aren’t the banks stronger now? one could ask. This is a fair question, yet the banks would be strong if we let them liquidate the parts of their companies that were hit the most. Had we done this we would have a stronger banking system and no moral hazard for the rest of the economy.
Automakers Bailouts 1.0 and 2.0
During the Great Recession the government bailed out the three big automakers in the US. But this was not the first time the government had bailed out a car company. Chrysler had already been bailed out in 1979, when they got $1.5 billion ($5.7 billion in today’s dollars). It is important to point out why Chrysler had needed to be bailed out. Charles Hyde, professor of history at Wayne State University and author of Riding the Roller Coaster: A History of the Chrysler Corporation, had this to say:
Well, in essence they made some very bad product choices throughout the 1970s. They decided to become specialists in large, gas-guzzling cars, and they did that right at the time there were two different Arab oil boycotts and crises with the price of gasoline. And their cars simply didn’t sell. The other problem they had were very serious quality problems. Their cars were probably the worst-built cars in any showrooms anywhere.
Chrysler emerged stronger after this; they made the necessary changes, and it seems that at least for a while they did well. But in 2008 Chrysler and GM both found themselves in trouble. This time around, the bailout was about $100 billion adjusted for inflation, which is about 17.5 times the previous one. And, again, we know these firms had made bad decisions (misallocated resources), since Ford and other car companies did not need a bailout.
The concerned reader may ask, Aren’t the bailouts the price we have to pay to save jobs? The problem is that these companies never really fixed their problems. While low interest rates have helped them, they have also made them more fragile. As I have written elsewhere, the car market is in an unsustainable bubble, and with sales going down and delinquencies that were already rising, another crash and maybe another round of bailouts seem inevitable. In fact, the Fed has already implicitly “bailed out” Ford by promising to buy the fallen angels‘ debt. So, while the bailouts may save some jobs in the short run, they will cause much more trouble in the long run.
Airline Bailout 1.0 and 2.0
Following the attack on 9/11, airline traffic suffered a big hit and the airline firms needed the government’s help “to survive.” The government at the time provided $5 billion in grants and $10 billion in loans (about $22 billion in today’s dollars). After the bailout bill was passed President George W. Bush said:
I commend the Congress for their cooperation and quick action in passing responsible legislation that will improve passenger safety, help the victims and their loved ones, and keep America’s airplanes flying while the airlines develop long-term viability plans.
But as it turns out, airline companies did not develop very good “long-term viability plans.” Recently, the US airlines were hit with the same problem they had after 9/11—a lack of passengers because of the COVID-19 crisis—and they could not have been less prepared for this. One would expect an industry that had experienced a similar situation not so long ago to be better prepared than others, but they clearly were not.
The government stepped in again and has bailed them out by allocating $25 billion in grants (30 percent of which will be repaid as a loan over ten years) and an additional $25 billion in loans.
But again one may ask, Doesn’t this save jobs? The answer to this important question is that this may save some jobs in the short run, yes, but the cost will be very high, since these jobs are not sustainable. What is more, this bailout will lead to lower economic growth, since the necessary resource reallocation will not happen.
Bailouts Lead to Lower Economic Growth
Our history of bailouts shows that we have created tremendous moral hazard. As I have argued above, some industries or firms have been repeatedly bailed out. Hence, these companies have never learned to be prudent and save for a rainy day, which shows that they are incompetent at best or simply care only for short-term profits. Take the airline industry, for instance. In the post–Great Recession period, the airline industry used 96 percent of its profits to buy back stocks and did not plan for a downturn. It is true that it was not easy to predict a situation like the current one caused by COVID-19, but many would disagree that this was a black swan, including Nassim Taleb himself.
Hence, the bailouts have led to bad use of resources, which can explain, at least in part, the slow economic growth we have experienced post–Great Recession. The issue with bailouts is that the tradeoffs we face are higher unemployment now followed by higher and sustainable economic growth later, or lower unemployment now followed by lower economic growth later. Bailouts are directly connected to productivity, as the graph below shows. This means that the more bailouts we have the lower the economic growth. This makes sense, since economic theory tells us that when a company fails it means that they were not using resources efficiently. If the company goes bankrupt, then either some or all of the resources will be transferred to more prudent investors, which will lead to better use of these resources and higher economic growth. On the other hand, when a company is bailed out, they will continue to make bad decisions and even worse others will get the message that they will not be held responsible by the market if they make bad decisions.
Conclusion
The good news is that some people are starting to speak out against these huge wealth transfers from taxpayers to large corporate shareholders and CEOs. In a recent interview for CNBC, Chamath Palihapitiya argued that companies that were not prudent should be left to go bankrupt. Sadly, many people are convinced that this would lead to massive unemployment, such that we are not bailing out corporations, but are rather helping workers. That is not quite the real story. When companies file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, it is the shareholders and the speculators who get hurt, not the workers.
Yet the federal government and the Fed are doing anything they can to keep the debt bubble going. This is nothing new, since the federal government and the Fed have brought us to the current situation in concert. The Fed’s low interest rate policy together with the implicit bailout guarantee from the federal government led corporations to borrow too much. This has made the economy so fragile that it could not even handle interest rates at half of what they were before the last crisis started. As the Fed increased interest rates in 2018, the economy started to slow down so fast that they had to reverse and start lowering interest rates in 2019. Now they effectively stand at zero. Low interest rates, along with the many programs the Fed has implemented during the COVID-19 crisis, have led corporations to borrow more than $617 billion in the last two months alone. So, the story of bailouts and low interest rates continues. But until it ends we cannot expect to have the real and sustainable economic growth we desperately need.
Alex Jones interviews Roger Stone days before his prison sentence is set to begin as he releases new information in the Ghislaine Maxwell / Jeffrey Epstein case.


newswars--2020-07-08--Biden Wants to Obliterate Suburbs With Radical Housing Plan That Restricts Single-Family Homes

Bad news to those who fled big city unrest for the suburbs : Joe Biden wants to permanently alter suburbs under a new housing program that would restrict single-family homes .
America ’ s suburbs would end as you know them under the Obama-era Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing regulations that Biden would supercharge if he wins the White House .
We already know what this program under Biden would entail , thanks to a Democratic lawmaker who proposed restricting single-family homes in Virginia by allowing multi-family houses built on the same-sized lots .
“ Once Biden starts to enforce AFFH @ @ @ @ @ @ @ meant it to work , it will be as if America ’ s suburbs had been swallowed up by the cities they surround , ” reported National Review ’ s Stanley Kurtz .
“ They will lose control of their own zoning and development , they will be pressured into a kind of de facto regional-revenue redistribution , and they will even be forced to start building high-density , low-income housing.
” “ The latter , of course , will require the elimination of single-family zoning .
With that , the basic character @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prelude to this is already occurring in big cities such as Austin , Texas , in which single-family homes are being redeveloped into duplexes and quadplexes in neighborhoods near downtown .
This would also occur in the suburbs under Biden , Kurtz warns , because he wants to combine AFFH with the eradication of single-family zoning in suburbs under a strategy proposed by New Jersey Senator ( and vegan ) Cory Booker .
Basically , the Booker/Biden approach is more radical than what was proposed under the Obama administration .
That said , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump administration because HUD Director Ben Carson never gotten rid of it .
“ It will be very tough for President Trump to make a political issue out of Biden ’ s housing plans so long as his own cabinet secretary is talking about killing suburban single-family zoning with AFFH , ” Kurtz lamented .
“ I think Carson ’ s wobbling on AFFH explains a lot about why Democrats have become so bold with their plans to undo suburban zoning.
” “ If even the Trump administration goes along with federal attacks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they ’ ve got political cover .
”

Bad news to those who fled big city unrest for the suburbs: Joe Biden wants to permanently alter suburbs under a new housing program that would restrict single-family homes.
America’s suburbs would end as you know them under the Obama-era Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing regulations that Biden would supercharge if he wins the White House.
We already know what this program under Biden would entail, thanks to a Democratic lawmaker who proposed restricting single-family homes in Virginia by allowing multi-family houses built on the same-sized lots.
“Once Biden starts to enforce AFFH the way Obama’s administration originally meant it to work, it will be as if America’s suburbs had been swallowed up by the cities they surround,” reported National Review’s Stanley Kurtz. “They will lose control of their own zoning and development, they will be pressured into a kind of de facto regional-revenue redistribution, and they will even be forced to start building high-density, low-income housing.”
“The latter, of course, will require the elimination of single-family zoning. With that, the basic character of the suburbs will disappear.”
Screenshot/Fair use
A prelude to this is already occurring in big cities such as Austin, Texas, in which single-family homes are being redeveloped into duplexes and quadplexes in neighborhoods near downtown.
This would also occur in the suburbs under Biden, Kurtz warns, because he wants to combine AFFH with the eradication of single-family zoning in suburbs under a strategy proposed by New Jersey Senator (and vegan) Cory Booker.
Basically, the Booker/Biden approach is more radical than what was proposed under the Obama administration.
That said, the AFFH rules still exist under the Trump administration because HUD Director Ben Carson never gotten rid of it.
“It will be very tough for President Trump to make a political issue out of Biden’s housing plans so long as his own cabinet secretary is talking about killing suburban single-family zoning with AFFH,” Kurtz lamented. “I think Carson’s wobbling on AFFH explains a lot about why Democrats have become so bold with their plans to undo suburban zoning.”
“If even the Trump administration goes along with federal attacks on suburban zoning, the Dems figure they’ve got political cover.”


newswars--2020-07-08--Biden Wants to Obliterate Suburbs Under Radical Housing Plan

Bad news to those who fled big city unrest for the suburbs: Joe Biden wants to permanently alter suburbs under a new housing program that would restrict single-family homes.
America’s suburbs would end as you know them under the Obama-era Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing regulations that Biden would supercharge if he wins the White House.
We already know what this program under Biden would entail, thanks to a Democratic lawmaker who proposed restricting single-family homes in Virginia by allowing multi-family houses built on the same-sized lots.
“Once Biden starts to enforce AFFH the way Obama’s administration originally meant it to work, it will be as if America’s suburbs had been swallowed up by the cities they surround,” reported National Review’s Stanley Kurtz. “They will lose control of their own zoning and development, they will be pressured into a kind of de facto regional-revenue redistribution, and they will even be forced to start building high-density, low-income housing.”
“The latter, of course, will require the elimination of single-family zoning. With that, the basic character of the suburbs will disappear.”
A prelude to this is already occurring in big cities such as Austin, Texas, in which single-family homes are being redeveloped into duplexes and quadplexes in neighborhoods near downtown.
This would also occur in the suburbs under Biden, Kurtz warns, because he wants to combine AFFH with the eradication of single-family zoning in suburbs under a strategy proposed by New Jersey Senator (and vegan) Cory Booker.
Basically, the Booker/Biden approach is more radical than what was proposed under the Obama administration.
That said, the AFFH rules still exist under the Trump administration because HUD Director Ben Carson never gotten rid of it.
“It will be very tough for President Trump to make a political issue out of Biden’s housing plans so long as his own cabinet secretary is talking about killing suburban single-family zoning with AFFH,” Kurtz lamented. “I think Carson’s wobbling on AFFH explains a lot about why Democrats have become so bold with their plans to undo suburban zoning.”
“If even the Trump administration goes along with federal attacks on suburban zoning, the Dems figure they’ve got political cover.”


newswars--2020-07-08--New Docs: NIH Owns Half of Key Patent For Controversial COVID Vaccine

New documents obtained by Axios and Public Citizen suggest that the National Institute of Health ( NIH ) owns half the key patent for Moderna ’ s controversial COVID vaccine and could collect half the royalties .
In addition , four NIH scientists have filed their own provisional patent application as co-inventors .
Little known NIH regulations let agency scientists collect up to $ 150,000.00 annually in royalties from vaccines upon which they worked .
These rules are recipes for regulatory corruption .
NIH ’ s stake in the jab may explain why Anthony Fauci moved Moderna ’ s vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to let Moderna skip animal trials despite the experimental technology and the inherent dangers of Coronavirus vaccines .
Every prior coronavirus vaccine has proven problematic and can be lethal to animals due to COVID ’ s unique penchant for “ pathogenic priming.
” Death occurs only after a vaccinated animal encounters the wild virus .
Public health advocates and scientists criticized Fauci ’ s decision to skip animal trials as reckless .
It may also explain why Anthony Fauci arranged a $ 483 million grant to Moderna from a sister NIH agency , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has never brought a product to market or gotten approval .
Fauci ’ s infusion made Moderna CEO Steve Bancel a billionaire and further enriched Fauci ’ s mentor and co-investor Bill Gates .
It may also explain why Fauci publicly announced he was “ encouraged ” by Moderna ’ s catastrophic Phase 1 clinical trials despite the fact that 20 % of the high dose and 6 % of the low dose groups of super healthy volunteers had Grade 3 “ severe or medically significant ” reactions following vaccination .
Those results @ @ @ @ @ @ @ medical product .
After getting the abysmal news , Bancel and four other Moderna executives immediately dumped more than $ 89 million in stock and Fauci was forced to make his optimistic public assessment to save Moderna ’ s plummeting shares from death spiral .
Fauci painted lipstick on that lame donkey and now he ’ s trying to convince everyone it ’ s a thoroughbred .
Moderna and NIH began manufacturing the first of 1 billion doses of the deadly vaccine this month .
Fauci knows from experience that no matter how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is convincing people to take it .
Pharma , after all , controls the media .
Alex Jones exposes the goblin king Bill Gates and the globalist agenda designed to bring humanity to heel .

New documents obtained by Axios and Public Citizen suggest that the National Institute of Health (NIH) owns half the key patent for Moderna’s controversial COVID vaccine and could collect half the royalties.
In addition, four NIH scientists have filed their own provisional patent application as co-inventors. Little known NIH regulations let agency scientists collect up to $150,000.00 annually in royalties from vaccines upon which they worked. These rules are recipes for regulatory corruption.
NIH’s stake in the jab may explain why Anthony Fauci moved Moderna’s vaccine to the front of the line and to let Moderna skip animal trials despite the experimental technology and the inherent dangers of Coronavirus vaccines. Every prior coronavirus vaccine has proven problematic and can be lethal to animals due to COVID’s unique penchant for “pathogenic priming.” Death occurs only after a vaccinated animal encounters the wild virus.
Public health advocates and scientists criticized Fauci’s decision to skip animal trials as reckless. It may also explain why Anthony Fauci arranged a $483 million grant to Moderna from a sister NIH agency, BARDA, despite the fact that Moderna has never brought a product to market or gotten approval.
Fauci’s infusion made Moderna CEO Steve Bancel a billionaire and further enriched Fauci’s mentor and co-investor Bill Gates. It may also explain why Fauci publicly announced he was “encouraged” by Moderna’s catastrophic Phase 1 clinical trials despite the fact that 20% of the high dose and 6% of the low dose groups of super healthy volunteers had Grade 3 “severe or medically significant” reactions following vaccination. Those results would have spelled DOA for any other medical product. After getting the abysmal news, Bancel and four other Moderna executives immediately dumped more than $89 million in stock and Fauci was forced to make his optimistic public assessment to save Moderna’s plummeting shares from death spiral.
Fauci painted lipstick on that lame donkey and now he’s trying to convince everyone it’s a thoroughbred. Moderna and NIH began manufacturing the first of 1 billion doses of the deadly vaccine this month. Fauci knows from experience that no matter how dangerous a vaccine, the easy part is convincing people to take it. Pharma, after all, controls the media.
Alex Jones exposes the goblin king Bill Gates and the globalist agenda designed to bring humanity to heel.


newswars--2020-07-08--Kanye West: “They Want to Put Chips Inside of Us”

Kanye West gave a wild interview to Forbes in which he asserted that vaccines were “ the mark of the beast ” and that the true agenda behind them was a plot to “ put chips inside of us.
” Much of the media coverage of the interview centered on the rapper ’ s supposed distancing of himself from President Trump after Kanye stated , “ I am taking the red hat off , with this interview.
” However , his other comments were significantly more incendiary .
Kanye revealed that he contracted coronavirus in February but that he wouldn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was produced because it would represent “ the mark of the beast.
” “ They want to put chips inside of us , they want to do all kinds of things , to make it where we can ’ t cross the gates of heaven , ” said the singer , adding that this was “ the saddest thing.
” While supposedly walking back his support for Trump , Kanye did describe him as the “ closest president we ’ ve had in years to allowing God to still be part of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ announced that he was running for president this year , although many reacted by suggesting that this was merely a stunt to promote his album .
The rapper denied this , asserting , “ I give my album away for free.
” My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever .
It is CRUCIAL that you support me .
Please sign up for the free newsletter here .
Donate to me on SubscribeStar here .
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost @ @ @ @ @ @ @

Kanye West gave a wild interview to Forbes in which he asserted that vaccines were “the mark of the beast” and that the true agenda behind them was a plot to “put chips inside of us.”
Much of the media coverage of the interview centered on the rapper’s supposed distancing of himself from President Trump after Kanye stated, “I am taking the red hat off, with this interview.”
However, his other comments were significantly more incendiary.
Kanye revealed that he contracted coronavirus in February but that he wouldn’t take a vaccine if one was produced because it would represent “the mark of the beast.”
“They want to put chips inside of us, they want to do all kinds of things, to make it where we can’t cross the gates of heaven,” said the singer, adding that this was “the saddest thing.”
While supposedly walking back his support for Trump, Kanye did describe him as the “closest president we’ve had in years to allowing God to still be part of the conversation.”
Over the weekend, Kanye announced that he was running for president this year, although many reacted by suggesting that this was merely a stunt to promote his album.
The rapper denied this, asserting, “I give my album away for free.”
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me.
Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
———————————————————————————————————————


newswars--2020-07-09--Hong Kong Schools Must Ensure “Patriotic” Content & Remove Books Breaching China Security Law

Things in Hong Kong have rapidly gone straight Orwellian very quickly after the July 1 enactment of the new national security law .
As we detailed this week activists are busy scrubbing their digital footprints , including deleting social media profiles and chat histories , given authorities can reportedly pry citizens ’ online communications from internet companies without a warrant under the law .
But it ’ s not just college-age and ‘ professional demonstrators ’ and pro-independence organizers that have to worry , as now even schools have been ordered to review textual content in books .
This means @ @ @ @ @ @ @ threat if they don ’ t visibly and “ positively ” conform .
Hong Kong ’ s Education Bureau this week announced that schools must review their own long in use education material , including books in classrooms and on library shelves , to ensure that no content which violates the law is present .
The bureau described this as part of an initiative to “ positively teach ” students regarding the new law .
“ In accordance with the four types of offences clearly stipulated in the law , the school management @ @ @ @ @ @ @ materials in a timely manner , including books , ” the Education Bureau said .
“ If they find outdated content or content that may concern the four aforementioned offences , they should remove them , ” it added .
This essentially hearkens back to 1930 ’ s Germany book burning days .
And in a chilling statement which seems straight of a dystopian novel , the Education Bureau added : “ As with other serious crimes or immoral behaviour that is not socially acceptable , materials should be removed and re-selected.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a city of free expression set apart from the overshadowing mainland .
But it appears that ’ s changing fast , already as prominent anti-Beijing activists have begun fleeing the city , amid fears the national security law could be applied retroactively .
“ Hong Kong has some of Asia ’ s best universities and a campus culture where topics that would be taboo on the mainland are still discussed and written about , ” AFP noted , and added disturbingly : “ But Beijing has made clear it wants education in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ especially after a year of huge , often violent and largely youth-led pro-democracy protests.
” Meanwhile , for the first time since Hong Kong reached its semi-autonomous status , a new Beijing security office has opened in the city , placing mainland Chinese law enforcement and intelligence agents there for the first time .

Things in Hong Kong have rapidly gone straight Orwellian very quickly after the July 1 enactment of the new national security law.
As we detailed this week activists are busy scrubbing their digital footprints, including deleting social media profiles and chat histories, given authorities can reportedly pry citizens’ online communications from internet companies without a warrant under the law.
But it’s not just college-age and ‘professional demonstrators’ and pro-independence organizers that have to worry, as now even schools have been ordered to review textual content in books. This means teachers and young students are coming under threat if they don’t visibly and “positively” conform.
Hong Kong’s Education Bureau this week announced that schools must review their own long in use education material, including books in classrooms and on library shelves, to ensure that no content which violates the law is present.
The bureau described this as part of an initiative to “positively teach” students regarding the new law. “In accordance with the four types of offences clearly stipulated in the law, the school management and teachers should review teaching and learning materials in a timely manner, including books,” the Education Bureau said.
“If they find outdated content or content that may concern the four aforementioned offences, they should remove them,” it added. This essentially hearkens back to 1930’s Germany book burning days.
And in a chilling statement which seems straight of a dystopian novel, the Education Bureau added: “As with other serious crimes or immoral behaviour that is not socially acceptable, materials should be removed and re-selected.”
China’s crackdown on Hong Kong gathered pace yesterday when pro- democracy books were removed from libraries and the authorities ordered schools and even nurseries to teach their pupils to obey the new national security law https://t.co/YOG9NAsBt7 — The Times (@thetimes) July 6, 2020
Hong Kong has long prided itself as a city of free expression set apart from the overshadowing mainland. But it appears that’s changing fast, already as prominent anti-Beijing activists have begun fleeing the city, amid fears the national security law could be applied retroactively.
“Hong Kong has some of Asia’s best universities and a campus culture where topics that would be taboo on the mainland are still discussed and written about,” AFP noted, and added disturbingly: “But Beijing has made clear it wants education in the city to become more ‘patriotic’ especially after a year of huge, often violent and largely youth-led pro-democracy protests.”
Meanwhile, for the first time since Hong Kong reached its semi-autonomous status, a new Beijing security office has opened in the city, placing mainland Chinese law enforcement and intelligence agents there for the first time.


newswars--2020-07-09--HATE HOAX: Oregon Politician Admits He Wrote Racist Letter to Himself

Oregon politician Jonathan Lopez has admitted to police that he sent an “ anonymous ” racist and threatening letter to himself in an apparent bid to advance his political career .
From KOMO News , “ Oregon politician wrote racist letter to himself , police say ” : A man who claimed he received a hate-filled , racist letter from an anonymous person allegedly wrote the letter himself , Hermiston Police say .
Chief Jason Edmiston tells KEPR-TV News that the criminal investigation for second-degree intimidation due to the racist , hate-filled letter received by Jonathan Lopez on June 23 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be referred this week to the Umatilla County District Attorney ’ s Office for initiating a false report – a Class A misdemeanor in Oregon .
Edmiston says the investigation has shown that Jonathan Lopez wrote the letter himself and made false statements to the police and on social media .
The end result is a verbal and written admission by Lopez that the letter was fabricated .
Additionally , the Hermiston Police are sending the Office of the District Attorney verifiable information of potential election fraud as it pertains to the Stolen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ credentials presented by Mr. Lopez during his run for county commissioner .
This in conjunction with a lengthy criminal history record may result in the filing of additional charges .
Lopez is also being accused of lying about having served in the US Coast Guard in violation of the 2013 Stolen Valor Act .
The media is censoring the full letter to hide the sick , twisted fantasies he made up to demonize all white Christian Americans , nonetheless I managed to find a full copy ( LANGUAGE WARNING ) : How long @ @ @ @ @ @ @ endorsement deal ?

Oregon politician Jonathan Lopez has admitted to police that he sent an “anonymous” racist and threatening letter to himself in an apparent bid to advance his political career.
From KOMO News, “Oregon politician wrote racist letter to himself, police say”:
A man who claimed he received a hate-filled, racist letter from an anonymous person allegedly wrote the letter himself, Hermiston Police say.
Chief Jason Edmiston tells KEPR-TV News that the criminal investigation for second-degree intimidation due to the racist, hate-filled letter received by Jonathan Lopez on June 23 has been closed. The matter will be referred this week to the Umatilla County District Attorney’s Office for initiating a false report – a Class A misdemeanor in Oregon.
Edmiston says the investigation has shown that Jonathan Lopez wrote the letter himself and made false statements to the police and on social media. The end result is a verbal and written admission by Lopez that the letter was fabricated.
Additionally, the Hermiston Police are sending the Office of the District Attorney verifiable information of potential election fraud as it pertains to the Stolen Valor Act of 2013 and other false credentials presented by Mr. Lopez during his run for county commissioner. This in conjunction with a lengthy criminal history record may result in the filing of additional charges.


newswars--2020-07-09--San Francisco Considers ‘CAREN Act’ to Penalize ‘Racially Exploitative’ 911 Callers

San Francisco may become the first city in the United States to ban 911 calls made under discriminatory or racially-motivated pretenses , at a time where race relations have become increasingly fragile .
Some high-profile incidents where white people were caught on camera calling the cops on people of color have prompted lawmakers in progressive California city to propose what they are calling the CAREN Act .
The CAREN Act stands for Caution Against Racially Exploitative Non-Emergencies , and was first revealed on Tuesday by San Francisco Democrat Shamann Walton at the Board of Supervisors .
The name of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Karen meme , originally mocking middle aged , affluent , frequently liberal white women who demand to speak to the managers of fast food and low level retail employees to complain about their job performance .
However , the left has since expanded the meme into a pejorative used to describe white women in general .
As CNN explains , “ And it ’ s not just ‘ Karen.
’ There are also names like ‘ Becky , ’ which has also come to symbolize a stereotype of whiteness .
And ‘ Susan.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Assemblyman Rob Bonta introduced a similar ordinance in the AB 1550 bill in an effort to criminalize false emergency reports against people under discriminatory circumstances .
Later addressing pre-existing legislation on “ hate crimes , ” the bill states : A victim of such a crime would be able to sue for statutory damages and emotional distress for up to $ 10,000 and attorney ’ s fees .
In a tweet , Bonta celebrated the announcement of the legislation , writing : “ Excited to announce our partnership with Supervisor @ shamannwalton !
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to join forces and stop discriminatory 911 calls : # AB1550 and the # CARENAct .
Using 911 as a tool for your prejudice towards marginalized communities is unjust and wrong !
” Some people welcomed the proposal , while others condemned the shaky grounds under which an accusation can be made .
One person tweeted : “ This is ironically racist .
It ’ s also a thought crime , how are you going to determine what ’ s inside someone ’ s head ?
” “ How do you know they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mean no white person can call police about a black person ?
” inquired another .

San Francisco may become the first city in the United States to ban 911 calls made under discriminatory or racially-motivated pretenses, at a time where race relations have become increasingly fragile.
Some high-profile incidents where white people were caught on camera calling the cops on people of color have prompted lawmakers in progressive California city to propose what they are calling the CAREN Act.
The CAREN Act stands for Caution Against Racially Exploitative Non-Emergencies, and was first revealed on Tuesday by San Francisco Democrat Shamann Walton at the Board of Supervisors.
The name of the legislation is meant to reference the popular Karen meme, originally mocking middle aged, affluent, frequently liberal white women who demand to speak to the managers of fast food and low level retail employees to complain about their job performance.
However, the left has since expanded the meme into a pejorative used to describe white women in general. As CNN explains, “And it’s not just ‘Karen.’ There are also names like ‘Becky,’ which has also come to symbolize a stereotype of whiteness. And ‘Susan.’ And ‘Chad.’”
California Assemblyman Rob Bonta introduced a similar ordinance in the AB 1550 bill in an effort to criminalize false emergency reports against people under discriminatory circumstances.
Later addressing pre-existing legislation on “hate crimes,” the bill states:
“This bill would authorize a person to bring a civil action against any responsible party, who, motivated by the person’s protected status, knowingly causes a peace officer to arrive at a location to contact the person with the intent to, among other things, infringe upon the person’s rights or cause the person to feel harassed, humiliated, or embarrassed.”
A victim of such a crime would be able to sue for statutory damages and emotional distress for up to $10,000 and attorney’s fees.
In a tweet, Bonta celebrated the announcement of the legislation, writing: “Excited to announce our partnership with Supervisor @shamannwalton! Today, we unveiled our two-prong strategy to join forces and stop discriminatory 911 calls: #AB1550 and the #CARENAct. Using 911 as a tool for your prejudice towards marginalized communities is unjust and wrong!”
Excited to announce our partnership with Supervisor @shamannwalton ! Today, we unveiled our two-prong strategy to join forces and stop discriminatory 911 calls: #AB1550 and the #CARENAct. Using 911 as a tool for your prejudice towards marginalized communities is unjust and wrong! pic.twitter.com/NBfBaLe6x2 — Rob Bonta (@RobBontaCA) July 7, 2020
Some people welcomed the proposal, while others condemned the shaky grounds under which an accusation can be made.
One person tweeted: “This is ironically racist. It’s also a thought crime, how are you going to determine what’s inside someone’s head?”
This is ironically racist. It’s also a thought crime, how are you going to determine what’s inside someone’s head? — 🎂 🥊 The Infamous KRAZYOWL🦉 (@krazyowl) July 8, 2020
“How do you know they’re racially biased? Does this mean no white person can call police about a black person?” inquired another.


newswars--2020-07-09--Don Lemon Bashes Jesus: “Admittedly Was Not Perfect When He Was Here”

Speaking to Chris Cuomo , who identifies as Catholic , Lemon compared Christ to the Founding Fathers and claimed neither were perfect .
“ Here ’ s the thing , ” said Lemon , who reportedly grew up Baptist according to FaithWire .
“ Jesus Christ — if that ’ s who you believe in , Jesus Christ — admittedly was not perfect when He was here on this earth.
” Cuomo appears to agree with a nod of approval .
“ So why are we deifying the founders of this country , many of whom owned slaves , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they didn ’ t want , they put slavery in there , that slavery should be abolished because it was the way the king wanted , and then the Congress said , ‘ No way , ’ ” Lemon argued .
Christian religious leaders took issue with Lemon ’ s skepticism over the Son of God .
“ Hey @ donlemon , I ’ m not sure where you got the idea that Jesus wasn ’ t ‘ perfect , ’ ” one follower of Christ alerted the CNN anchor , “ but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you all the ways he was more perfect than we could ever imagine.
” A pastor also contested Lemon ’ s statement and offered to educate him , telling him , “ Good sir , Jesus was perfect .
He had no sin .
He is the unblemished Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the word.
” FaithWire , which notes Lemon should know better considering his Catholic school upbringing , points out the notion of Jesus ’ perfection is “ at the core of the substitutionary atonement , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ everyone ’ s sins which “ grants salvation to those who put their faith ” in Him .
According to several Bible passages , Jesus lived a wholly sinless life while He was on earth .
Scripture says He “ committed no sin ” ( 1 Peter 2:22 ) , “ knew no sin ” ( 2 Corinthians 5:21 ) , was “ a lamb without blemish or spot ” ( 1 Peter 1:19 ) and is “ holy and blameless , unstained by sin ” ( Hebrews 7:26 ) .
Furthermore , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” ( John 10:30 ) , He is perfect just as the Father is perfect ( Matthew 5:48 ) .
Not only did Jesus not sin , He would not have been able to even choose to sin .
The Italian priest Thomas Aquinas defined sin as “ an utterance , a deed , or a desire contrary to the eternal law.
” That “ eternal law ” is rooted in God ’ s character , so to go against it would be a direct contradiction to His very nature — an impossibility @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his life to Jesus Christ and why he sought the path to God again .

CNN anchor Don Lemon disputed Jesus Christ’s perfection in a recent rant bashing America’s founding fathers.
Speaking to Chris Cuomo, who identifies as Catholic, Lemon compared Christ to the Founding Fathers and claimed neither were perfect.
“Jesus Christ, if that’s who you believe, if that’s who you believe in, admittedly was not perfect when he was here on this earth.” Prominent leftists don’t understand even the most basic aspects of the most basic things we believe. pic.twitter.com/QzwjNJC4O8 — Michael Knowles (@michaeljknowles) July 9, 2020
“Here’s the thing,” said Lemon, who reportedly grew up Baptist according to FaithWire. “Jesus Christ — if that’s who you believe in, Jesus Christ — admittedly was not perfect when He was here on this earth.”
Cuomo appears to agree with a nod of approval.
“So why are we deifying the founders of this country, many of whom owned slaves, and the Constitution — the original one — they didn’t want, they put slavery in there, that slavery should be abolished because it was the way the king wanted, and then the Congress said, ‘No way,’” Lemon argued.
Christian religious leaders took issue with Lemon’s skepticism over the Son of God.
“Hey @donlemon, I’m not sure where you got the idea that Jesus wasn’t ‘perfect,’” one follower of Christ alerted the CNN anchor, “but I’d love to share with you all the ways he was more perfect than we could ever imagine.”
Hey @donlemon, I’m not sure where you got the idea that Jesus wasn’t “perfect,” but I’d love to share with you all the ways he was more perfect than we could ever imagine. His perfection is the reason we have any hope in this broken world. pic.twitter.com/dBopFco5o4 — Raymond Chang (@tweetraychang) July 9, 2020
A pastor also contested Lemon’s statement and offered to educate him, telling him, “Good sir, Jesus was perfect. He had no sin. He is the unblemished Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the word.”
@donlemon, good sir, Jesus was perfect. He had no sin. He is the unblemished Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world. If you want theological advice, hit me up please. God bless — Dr. Derwin L. Gray (@DerwinLGray) July 9, 2020
Can you think of anything more preposterous than declaring to the nation that Jesus “admittedly” wasn’t perfect. Maybe that Moses was a nitro-burning drag car racer in Egypt? Or that Hitler was briefly engaged to Cousin Itt? I got nothing. @realDailyWire https://t.co/LcKaY1ZVWo — Eric Metaxas (@ericmetaxas) July 9, 2020
I don’t know who needs to hear this, but you can’t be a Bible believing Christian and think Jesus lived anything but a perfect life. — Cabot Phillips (@cabot_phillips) July 9, 2020
FaithWire, which notes Lemon should know better considering his Catholic school upbringing, points out the notion of Jesus’ perfection is “at the core of the substitutionary atonement,” the Christian belief that he died for everyone’s sins which “grants salvation to those who put their faith” in Him.
According to several Bible passages, Jesus lived a wholly sinless life while He was on earth. Scripture says He “committed no sin” (1 Peter 2:22), “knew no sin” (2 Corinthians 5:21), was “a lamb without blemish or spot” (1 Peter 1:19) and is “holy and blameless, unstained by sin” (Hebrews 7:26). Furthermore, because God and Jesus “are one” (John 10:30), He is perfect just as the Father is perfect (Matthew 5:48). Not only did Jesus not sin, He would not have been able to even choose to sin. The Italian priest Thomas Aquinas defined sin as “an utterance, a deed, or a desire contrary to the eternal law.” That “eternal law” is rooted in God’s character, so to go against it would be a direct contradiction to His very nature — an impossibility.
Roger Stone tells how he rededicated his life to Jesus Christ and why he sought the path to God again.


newswars--2020-07-09--Man Arrested For Pulling Gun On Customer Not Wearing Mask

A 59-year-old man has been arrested after he pulled a gun on an individual who was not wearing a mask inside a Walgreens pharmacy .
The Boston Herald reports , “ Todd Goulston , of East Bridgewater , was arrested and charged with assault with a dangerous weapon , disorderly conduct and disturbing the peace .
Bridgewater Police on July 3 at around 5:20 p.m. responded to Walgreens Pharmacy , located at 4 Central Square , for a report of two men arguing inside the store .
The argument was about one of the men not wearing a mask.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ inside the store , eventually leading to Goulston brandishing his firearm in the store parking lot .
No shots were fired and the two men left the parking lot without incident , but police were able to track Goulston ’ s vehicle and arrested him at his home .
Goulston ’ s license to carry was seized along with multiple firearms inside his house .
Despite a state order requiring masks when inside stores , the man who had the gun drawn on him was not issued a citation .
As tension over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this will likely take place more frequently .

A 59-year-old man has been arrested after he pulled a gun on an individual who was not wearing a mask inside a Walgreens pharmacy.
The Boston Herald reports, “Todd Goulston, of East Bridgewater, was arrested and charged with assault with a dangerous weapon, disorderly conduct and disturbing the peace. Bridgewater Police on July 3 at around 5:20 p.m. responded to Walgreens Pharmacy, located at 4 Central Square, for a report of two men arguing inside the store. The argument was about one of the men not wearing a mask.”
Goulston and the unmasked man allegedly argued inside the store, eventually leading to Goulston brandishing his firearm in the store parking lot.
No shots were fired and the two men left the parking lot without incident, but police were able to track Goulston’s vehicle and arrested him at his home.
Goulston’s license to carry was seized along with multiple firearms inside his house.
Despite a state order requiring masks when inside stores, the man who had the gun drawn on him was not issued a citation.
As tension over mandatory mask mandates escalates, confrontations like this will likely take place more frequently.


newswars--2020-07-09--Watch: Bill de Blasio & Al Sharpton Paint “Black Lives Matter” On Street In Front Of Trump Tower

New York City Mayor Bill De Blasio and activist Al Sharpton took part in a photo op on Thursday where @ @ @ @ @ painting the words “ Black Lives Matter ” on 5th Avenue outside Trump Tower in @ @ @ @ @ first of its kind strategy in progress by Mayor DeBlasio : At the same time @ @ @ @ @ the President for a $ 7.4 BILLION bailout while also trolling the President by painting @ @ @ @ @ Trump Tower in NYC .
pic.twitter.com/WneNPtg0kO “ We are saying black lives matter in New @ @ @ @ @ matter in The United States of America .
Let ’ s show Donald Trump what @ @ @ @ @ Let ’ s paint it right in front of his building for him , ” @ @ @ @ @ Have you ever seen a more useless politician than Bill de Blasio ?
This is @ @ @ @

New York City Mayor Bill De Blasio and activist Al Sharpton took part in a photo op on Thursday where they joined BLM activists in painting the words “Black Lives Matter” on 5th Avenue outside Trump Tower in NYC.
Fascinatingly ineffective, first of its kind strategy in progress by Mayor DeBlasio: At the same time, he is both asking the President for a $7.4 BILLION bailout while also trolling the President by painting this mural in front of Trump Tower in NYC.
pic.twitter.com/WneNPtg0kO — Lee Zeldin (@RepLeeZeldin) July 9, 2020
“We are saying black lives matter in New York City and black lives matter in The United States of America. Let’s show Donald Trump what he does not understand. Let’s paint it right in front of his building for him,” the NYC Mayor said.


newswars--2020-07-09--Supreme Court: Nearly Half Of Oklahoma Is Indian Reservation

While all eyes were on the Supreme Court ’ s Thursday decision granting New York prosecutors access to President Trump ’ s taxes , a ruling earlier in the day recognized roughly half of Oklahoma as an Indian reservation – in a move which could have wide-ranging legal implications for the 1.8 million people who now live in “ Indian Country , ” according to the New York Times .
The decision , authored by Justice Neil Gorsuch , holds the United States to an 1866 treaty that the Muscogee ( Creek ) Nation signed with the United States after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ home to the “ Five Civilized Tribes ” ; the Creek , Cherokee Nation , the Seminole , the Chickasaw Nation , and the Choctaw Nation , according to The New Republic .
“ Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law , ” wrote Gorsuch , a Trump appointee .
“ Because Congress has not said otherwise , we hold the government to its word.
” Joining Gorsuch in the majority were Justices Sonya Sotomayor , Elena Kagan , Stephen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Justices Alito , Kavanaugh , Roberts and Clarence Thomas argued in the minority – siding with the state of Oklahoma .
“ A century of practice confirms that the Five Tribes ’ prior domains were extinguished , ” wrote Roberts .
“ The State has maintained unquestioned jurisdiction for more than 100 years .
Tribe members make up less than 10 % –15 % of the population of their former domain , and until a few years ago the Creek Nation itself acknowledged that it no longer possessed the reservation the Court discovers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ State ’ s ability to prosecute serious crimes will be hobbled and decades of past convictions could well be thrown out , ” and that “ The decision today creates significant uncertainty for the State ’ s continuing authority over any area that touches Indian affairs , ranging from zoning and taxation to family and environmental law.
” The original case ( via the New York Times ) : The case concerned Jimcy McGirt , a member of the Muscogee ( Creek ) Nation who was convicted of sex crimes against a child @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s historical boundaries .
He said that only federal authorities were entitled to prosecute him .
Mr. McGirt argued that Congress had never clearly destroyed the sovereignty of the Creek Nation over the area , covering about half the state .
The solicitor general of Oklahoma took the opposite view , saying the area had never been reservation land .
McGirt v. Oklahoma , No .
18-9526 , an appeal from a state court ’ s decision , was the Supreme Court ’ s second attempt to resolve the status of eastern Oklahoma @ @ @ @ @ @ @ heard arguments in Sharp v. Murphy , No .
17-1107 , which arose from the prosecution in state court of Patrick Murphy , a Creek Indian , for murdering George Jacobs in rural McIntosh County , east of Oklahoma City .
After he was sentenced to death , it emerged that the murder had taken place on what had once been Indian land .
Mr. Murphy argued that only the federal government could prosecute him and that a federal law barred the imposition of the death penalty because he was an Indian .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Appeals for the 10th Circuit , in Denver .
But when the case was argued before an eight-member Supreme Court , the justices seemed divided and troubled .
( Justice Neil M. Gorsuch , who had served on the 10th Circuit when it ruled on the case , recused himself . )
Instead of issuing a decision before the term ended in June 2019 , the court announced it would hear another set of arguments in its current term , which started in October .
That was a sign the court had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there was no new argument in the Murphy case , probably because it was not clear another hearing would break the deadlock .
Instead , the court heard Mr. McGirt ’ s case , allowing the overarching issue to be settled by a nine-member court .
Muscogee tribal leaders cheered the ruling , vowing to work with state and federal law-enforcement authorities to ensure public safety within the reservation , according to the Times .
“ This is a historic day , ” said Principal Chief David Hill .
“ This is amazing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to make things right .
”

While all eyes were on the Supreme Court’s Thursday decision granting New York prosecutors access to President Trump’s taxes, a ruling earlier in the day recognized roughly half of Oklahoma as an Indian reservation – in a move which could have wide-ranging legal implications for the 1.8 million people who now live in “Indian Country,” according to the New York Times.
I guess these are the new borders of Oklahoma. pic.twitter.com/yCmbICBWHY — Յովհաննէս Թաշճեան (@UnspeakablChaos) July 9, 2020
The decision, authored by Justice Neil Gorsuch, holds the United States to an 1866 treaty that the Muscogee (Creek) Nation signed with the United States after the Civil War over land which was home to the “Five Civilized Tribes”; the Creek, Cherokee Nation, the Seminole, the Chickasaw Nation, and the Choctaw Nation, according to The New Republic.
“Today we are asked whether the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for purposes of federal criminal law,” wrote Gorsuch, a Trump appointee. “Because Congress has not said otherwise, we hold the government to its word.”
Joining Gorsuch in the majority were Justices Sonya Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Stephen Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, while Justices Alito, Kavanaugh, Roberts and Clarence Thomas argued in the minority – siding with the state of Oklahoma.
“A century of practice confirms that the Five Tribes’ prior domains were extinguished,” wrote Roberts. “The State has maintained unquestioned jurisdiction for more than 100 years. Tribe members make up less than 10%–15% of the population of their former domain, and until a few years ago the Creek Nation itself acknowledged that it no longer possessed the reservation the Court discovers today.”
Roberts added that “The State’s ability to prosecute serious crimes will be hobbled and decades of past convictions could well be thrown out,” and that “The decision today creates significant uncertainty for the State’s continuing authority over any area that touches Indian affairs, ranging from zoning and taxation to family and environmental law.”
The original case (via the New York Times):
The case concerned Jimcy McGirt, a member of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation who was convicted of sex crimes against a child by state authorities in the Nation’s historical boundaries. He said that only federal authorities were entitled to prosecute him. Mr. McGirt argued that Congress had never clearly destroyed the sovereignty of the Creek Nation over the area, covering about half the state. The solicitor general of Oklahoma took the opposite view, saying the area had never been reservation land. McGirt v. Oklahoma, No. 18-9526, an appeal from a state court’s decision, was the Supreme Court’s second attempt to resolve the status of eastern Oklahoma. In November 2018, the justices heard arguments in Sharp v. Murphy, No. 17-1107, which arose from the prosecution in state court of Patrick Murphy, a Creek Indian, for murdering George Jacobs in rural McIntosh County, east of Oklahoma City. After he was sentenced to death, it emerged that the murder had taken place on what had once been Indian land. Mr. Murphy argued that only the federal government could prosecute him and that a federal law barred the imposition of the death penalty because he was an Indian. Mr. Murphy convinced the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, in Denver. But when the case was argued before an eight-member Supreme Court, the justices seemed divided and troubled. (Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, who had served on the 10th Circuit when it ruled on the case, recused himself.) Instead of issuing a decision before the term ended in June 2019, the court announced it would hear another set of arguments in its current term, which started in October. That was a sign the court had deadlocked, 4 to 4. But there was no new argument in the Murphy case, probably because it was not clear another hearing would break the deadlock. Instead, the court heard Mr. McGirt’s case, allowing the overarching issue to be settled by a nine-member court.
Muscogee tribal leaders cheered the ruling, vowing to work with state and federal law-enforcement authorities to ensure public safety within the reservation, according to the Times.
“This is a historic day,” said Principal Chief David Hill. “This is amazing. It’s never too late to make things right.”


newswars--2020-07-09--Flynn Judge Defies Appeals Court, Asks For Full Review Of Order To Drop Case

The judge in Michael Flynn ’ s criminal case is refusing to accept the results of a federal appeals court three-judge decision ordering him to dismiss the case against the former national security adviser .
Judge Emmet Sullivan has instead asked the appeals court for an ‘ en banc ’ review of the decision – meaning the entire panel of all active judges on the court would re-hear the case .
Judge Sullivan refuses to give up – and asks the DC Circuit for a rehearing ( en banc ) on the dismissal of the Flynn case .
Allegation : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ threatens the orderly administration of justice.
” Now that you 're intellectually ahead , stay physically ahead by visiting the Infowars Store .
Interestingly , if the appeals court grants the en banc request , reversing the previous ruling would mean undermining a decision by Obama appointee , Chief Judge Srinivasan – whose ruling in United States v. Fokker Services B.V. effectively removed Sullivan ’ s authority to deny the DOJ ’ s request to dismiss Flynn ’ s case .
Some commentators have read Fokker as effectively wiping out Sullivan ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ request in Flynn ’ s case , given that opinion ’ s sweeping assertion that “ decisions to dismiss pending criminal charges … lie squarely within the ken of prosecutorial discretion , ” leaving no “ substantial role for courts.
” But it would be a mistake to overread this passage .
Fokker concerned a trial court ’ s authority under the Speedy Trial Act to interfere with a proposed deferred prosecution agreement , essentially a form of pretrial probation in which a case is put on hold for a year or more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s behavior .
No Rule 48 motion was filed in that case , which means the court of appeals had no occasion to revisit or alter its governing opinion in Ammidown .
–Lawfare Blog As CNBC notes , however , en banc reviews are rarely granted – but Flynn ’ s case is anything but common .

The judge in Michael Flynn’s criminal case is refusing to accept the results of a federal appeals court three-judge decision ordering him to dismiss the case against the former national security adviser.
Judge Emmet Sullivan has instead asked the appeals court for an ‘en banc’ review of the decision – meaning the entire panel of all active judges on the court would re-hear the case.
Interestingly, if the appeals court grants the en banc request, reversing the previous ruling would mean undermining a decision by Obama appointee, Chief Judge Srinivasan – whose ruling in United States v. Fokker Services B.V. effectively removed Sullivan’s authority to deny the DOJ’s request to dismiss Flynn’s case.
Some commentators have read Fokker as effectively wiping out Sullivan’s authority to deny the government’s request in Flynn’s case, given that opinion’s sweeping assertion that “decisions to dismiss pending criminal charges … lie squarely within the ken of prosecutorial discretion,” leaving no “substantial role for courts.” But it would be a mistake to overread this passage. Fokker concerned a trial court’s authority under the Speedy Trial Act to interfere with a proposed deferred prosecution agreement, essentially a form of pretrial probation in which a case is put on hold for a year or more while the prosecutor monitors the defendant’s behavior. No Rule 48 motion was filed in that case, which means the court of appeals had no occasion to revisit or alter its governing opinion in Ammidown. –Lawfare Blog
As CNBC notes, however, en banc reviews are rarely granted – but Flynn’s case is anything but common.
The response to Covid-19 mirrors Communist Chinese brainwashing torture techniques.


newswars--2020-07-09--India Releases ‘Tik Tik – Made in India’ After Country Bans China-Made ‘TikTok’

TikTok , the Chinese social media platform , has been intensely scrutinized for accusations of spyware , storing and sharing user data with the Chinese government , and questionable content surfacing throughout the COVID-19 pandemic , all leading to abundant controversy .
In India , TikTok was one of 59 apps banned in concert with rising geopolitical tensions between India and neighboring China .
As a result , a Keralan developer came up with a replacement for the popular platform .
“ Tik Tik – Made in India ” was originally designed to compete with TikTok , and since the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has enjoyed immense success since its unveiling .
The app , available on the Google Play Store , appears to be experiencing growing pains after a massive surge in use following the ban of TikTok , but the majority of its over 14,000 user reviews are positive .
The man behind the new app , a third-year IT student at University College of Engineering , Kariyavattom identified in media only as Ashish , explained that he originally made the app to compete with TikTok , not replace it .
“ I had earlier @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” said Ashish .
“ Once TikTok was banned , I renamed and re-launched the app as ‘ Tik Tik ’ .
I named the app ‘ Tik Tik ’ so that people easily register the name .
That slight tweaking seems to have worked.
” In addition to offering similar functionality , the new platform is not constrained by the rigid upload time limits TikTok employed .
Ashish said that currently there are no video length limits to the app .
TikTok had a one-minute limit to upload videos .
With @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of any length , ” Ashish , told the New Indian Express , ” “ A user can shoot , upload and edit videos in the app .
Regarding editing , users can trim , join , add audio and apply transitions .
This will enable the user to create high-quality video content , ” he continued .
The creator is reportedly pleased with the success his platform has enjoyed , although he initially hoped to use TikTok itself to further the competing platform ’ s reach .
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo @ @ @ @ @ @ @ consider banning TikTok , despite the mobile phone application being downloaded 2 billion times since 2016 , as well as other Chinese apps .
China denies any allegations of wrongdoing surrounding the platform .

TikTok, the Chinese social media platform, has been intensely scrutinized for accusations of spyware, storing and sharing user data with the Chinese government, and questionable content surfacing throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, all leading to abundant controversy.
In India, TikTok was one of 59 apps banned in concert with rising geopolitical tensions between India and neighboring China. As a result, a Keralan developer came up with a replacement for the popular platform.
“Tik Tik – Made in India” was originally designed to compete with TikTok, and since the Chinese app was banned in India, has enjoyed immense success since its unveiling.
The app, available on the Google Play Store, appears to be experiencing growing pains after a massive surge in use following the ban of TikTok, but the majority of its over 14,000 user reviews are positive.
The man behind the new app, a third-year IT student at University College of Engineering, Kariyavattom identified in media only as Ashish, explained that he originally made the app to compete with TikTok, not replace it.
“I had earlier uploaded the app under the name BlogsApp,” said Ashish. “Once TikTok was banned, I renamed and re-launched the app as ‘Tik Tik’. I named the app ‘Tik Tik’ so that people easily register the name. That slight tweaking seems to have worked.”
In addition to offering similar functionality, the new platform is not constrained by the rigid upload time limits TikTok employed. Ashish said that currently there are no video length limits to the app.
TikTok had a one-minute limit to upload videos. With Tik Tik, you can record videos of any length,” Ashish, told the New Indian Express,”
“A user can shoot, upload and edit videos in the app. Regarding editing, users can trim, join, add audio and apply transitions. This will enable the user to create high-quality video content,” he continued.
The creator is reportedly pleased with the success his platform has enjoyed, although he initially hoped to use TikTok itself to further the competing platform’s reach.
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo recently announced the United States would also consider banning TikTok, despite the mobile phone application being downloaded 2 billion times since 2016, as well as other Chinese apps.
China denies any allegations of wrongdoing surrounding the platform.
The response to Covid-19 mirrors Communist Chinese brainwashing torture techniques.


newswars--2020-07-09--COVID-19 Soon No Longer An ‘Epidemic’ At Current Rate of Decline – CDC

According to the CDC reports from March to May , COVID-19 deaths had a sudden spike and then immediately proceeded to drop , and if the drop continues the viral disease will no longer be considered an epidemic according to international standards .
Although infection rates are fluctuating , death rates remain flat and are likely to drop further , which will lead COVID-19 to soon no longer qualify as an epidemic .
This can be found on the Mortality box on the CDC ’ s web page : “ Based on death certificate data , the percentage of deaths @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( PIC ) decreased from 9.0 % during week 25 to 5.9 % during week 26 , representing the tenth week of a declining percentage of deaths due to PIC .
The percentage is currently at the epidemic threshold but will likely change as more death certificates are processed , particularly for recent weeks.
” This change from epidemic rates to normalcy could happen as quickly as a few weeks from now .
Since the infection rates of COVID-19 are higher in certain parts of the United States , and the flat rate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over the last 10 weeks , the information suggests that the improved treatment methods for COVID-19 are working .
According to Just The News , this can also be attributed to the fact that most new infectious cases are in young adults who are very rarely terminal .
In order for the CDC to qualify a disease as an epidemic the illness needs to exceeds a certain percentage of deaths per week .
While many fear a second outbreak of COVID-19 , the increase in infection rates and even hospitalizations has done nothing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ largely due to the age of most new infected individuals The CDC spokesperson says the officially death count across the United States “ will likely change as more death certificates are processed , particularly for recent weeks.
” Although diseases such as pneumonia , influenza , and COVID-19 alike , tend to fluctuate in death rates from about 7 % in the more infectious times back down to 5 % during virally dormant months .

According to the CDC reports from March to May, COVID-19 deaths had a sudden spike and then immediately proceeded to drop, and if the drop continues the viral disease will no longer be considered an epidemic according to international standards.
Although infection rates are fluctuating, death rates remain flat and are likely to drop further, which will lead COVID-19 to soon no longer qualify as an epidemic.
This can be found on the Mortality box on the CDC’s web page:
“Based on death certificate data, the percentage of deaths attributed to pneumonia, influenza or COVID-19 (PIC) decreased from 9.0% during week 25 to 5.9% during week 26, representing the tenth week of a declining percentage of deaths due to PIC. The percentage is currently at the epidemic threshold but will likely change as more death certificates are processed, particularly for recent weeks.”
This change from epidemic rates to normalcy could happen as quickly as a few weeks from now.
Since the infection rates of COVID-19 are higher in certain parts of the United States, and the flat rate of deaths remains the same or lower over the last 10 weeks, the information suggests that the improved treatment methods for COVID-19 are working.
According to Just The News, this can also be attributed to the fact that most new infectious cases are in young adults who are very rarely terminal.
In order for the CDC to qualify a disease as an epidemic the illness needs to exceeds a certain percentage of deaths per week.
While many fear a second outbreak of COVID-19, the increase in infection rates and even hospitalizations has done nothing to spike the mortality rate., again largely due to the age of most new infected individuals
The CDC spokesperson says the officially death count across the United States “will likely change as more death certificates are processed, particularly for recent weeks.”
Although diseases such as pneumonia, influenza, and COVID-19 alike, tend to fluctuate in death rates from about 7% in the more infectious times back down to 5% during virally dormant months.
The response to Covid-19 mirrors Communist Chinese brainwashing torture techniques.


newswars--2020-07-09--Serbian Defense Minister Calls Protests A ‘Coup Attempt,’ Aim to Spark Civil War

Violent clashes that rocked Belgrade and other cities this week were “ carefully prepared , ” and are aimed at seizing power and igniting a civil war in Serbia , the Balkan country ’ s defense minister has alleged .
What started as a demonstration against the government-planned curfew over the coronavirus eventually got out of hand and snowballed into massive riots that saw mostly young people assaulting police squads in Belgrade and other major Serbian cities .
The brewing unrest is actually a coup attempt , Serbian Defense Minister Aleksandar Vulin opined on Thursday while speaking on local television @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has purely political backgrounds , he argued .
“ We have a coup attempt , we have an attempt to seize power by force and an attempt to provoke a civil war in Serbia .
It can not be described in any other way.
” President Aleksandar Vucic announced on Tuesday that a curfew would be put in place this Friday and run throughout the weekend .
Right after , thousands of people gathered outside the parliament .
They clashed with police while apparently trying to get into the building .
Riot squads @ @ @ @ @ @ @ back .
According to Defense Minister Vulin , the protests were a coordinated action and “ did not happen by accident.
” He noted that media coverage across the Balkans was generally hostile toward the Serbian government , which , again , “ is not accidental.
” “ It is obvious that there is an orchestrated [ media ] campaign because they do not want a successful and stable Serbia.
” The Balkan nation has reported over 17,000 Covid-19 cases and over 340 fatalities .
Mass protests , in which people didn ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the risk of spreading the contagion , Vulin warned .
“ I wonder who will be responsible for the fact that hundreds and thousands of people became infected yesterday and the day before yesterday , ” he said .
Meanwhile , President Vucic backtracked on the curfew .
The government is expected to try other measures , including shortened hours for public spaces and fines for those not wearing protective masks .
Alex Jones interviews Roger Stone days before his prison sentence is set to begin as he releases new information in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @

Violent clashes that rocked Belgrade and other cities this week were “carefully prepared,” and are aimed at seizing power and igniting a civil war in Serbia, the Balkan country’s defense minister has alleged.
What started as a demonstration against the government-planned curfew over the coronavirus eventually got out of hand and snowballed into massive riots that saw mostly young people assaulting police squads in Belgrade and other major Serbian cities.
The brewing unrest is actually a coup attempt, Serbian Defense Minister Aleksandar Vulin opined on Thursday while speaking on local television. The “terrible street violence” has purely political backgrounds, he argued.
“We have a coup attempt, we have an attempt to seize power by force and an attempt to provoke a civil war in Serbia. It cannot be described in any other way.”
President Aleksandar Vucic announced on Tuesday that a curfew would be put in place this Friday and run throughout the weekend. Right after, thousands of people gathered outside the parliament.
They clashed with police while apparently trying to get into the building. Riot squads fired tear gas to force the crowds back.
According to Defense Minister Vulin, the protests were a coordinated action and “did not happen by accident.” He noted that media coverage across the Balkans was generally hostile toward the Serbian government, which, again, “is not accidental.”
“It is obvious that there is an orchestrated [media] campaign because they do not want a successful and stable Serbia.”
The Balkan nation has reported over 17,000 Covid-19 cases and over 340 fatalities. Mass protests, in which people didn’t keep apart, have only increased the risk of spreading the contagion, Vulin warned.
“I wonder who will be responsible for the fact that hundreds and thousands of people became infected yesterday and the day before yesterday,” he said.
Meanwhile, President Vucic backtracked on the curfew. The government is expected to try other measures, including shortened hours for public spaces and fines for those not wearing protective masks.
Alex Jones interviews Roger Stone days before his prison sentence is set to begin as he releases new information in the Ghislaine Maxwell / Jeffrey Epstein case.


newswars--2020-07-09--Watch Live! Americans Growing Sick of Democrat and Liberal Tyranny Over Their Freedoms

Also catch the streams at infowars.com/show and Banned.video .
Supreme Court Rules Against Trump on Tax Returns as Civil War Intensifies This Thursday broadcast is absolutely jam-packed with exclusive information from Roger Stone and more !
Tune in and share this link !
Watch and share today ’ s bombshell Thursday edition of the most banned broadcast in the world !
Also on today ’ s show , Alex Jones breaks down the respected Texas doctor Richard Bartlett ’ s findings on his success rate with his emergency room experience treating COVID-19 patients with the inhaled steroid budesonide , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ David Knight Show : Who Is The Master ?
Who Is The Slave ?
– Time To Choose Between Schooling Or Education Share this banned broadcast to join Infowars in the battle for free speech !
On this Thursday transmission of The David Knight Show , we ’ ll discuss the government ’ s agenda as America prepares to enter another phase of “ lockdowns ” due to the media ’ s focus on increased coronavirus cases instead of the falling national death rate .
Also , find out about the CAREN act @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the Supreme Court , another phony hate crime and much more .

Owen Shroyer hosts this LIVE edition of War Room, weekdays 3-6 p.m. CT.
Also catch the streams at infowars.com/show and Banned.video.
Supreme Court Rules Against Trump on Tax Returns as Civil War Intensifies
This Thursday broadcast is absolutely jam-packed with exclusive information from Roger Stone and more! Tune in and share this link!
Watch and share today’s bombshell Thursday edition of the most banned broadcast in the world! Also on today’s show, Alex Jones breaks down the respected Texas doctor Richard Bartlett’s findings on his success rate with his emergency room experience treating COVID-19 patients with the inhaled steroid budesonide, a drug commonly used to treat asthma.
Share this video below:
Also, follow Alex Jones on Telegram:
David Knight Show: Who Is The Master? Who Is The Slave? – Time To Choose Between Schooling Or Education
Share this banned broadcast to join Infowars in the battle for free speech!
On this Thursday transmission of The David Knight Show, we’ll discuss the government’s agenda as America prepares to enter another phase of “lockdowns” due to the media’s focus on increased coronavirus cases instead of the falling national death rate.
Also, find out about the CAREN act, the latest decision to come out of the Supreme Court, another phony hate crime and much more.
Watch Live: Who Is The Master? Slave? – Time To Choose Schooling Or Education – CAREN Act https://t.co/6pb2sUhh5x — David Knight (@libertytarian) July 9, 2020


newswars--2020-07-09--Video: New Yorkers Sign Petition to Topple ‘Slave Owner’ Washington Statue, But Not Muhammad

A social experiment by Ami Horowitz shows New Yorkers gleefully signing a petition to take down statues of “ slave owners ” like George Washington , but suddenly becoming reticent when Horowitz mentions the Prophet Muhammad .
“ I want to take down all statues of people who owned slaves in this country , ” Horowitz told potential signatories , emphasizing how he wanted to remove the statue of George Washington in DC .
All of the people featured in the video gleefully signed the petition to take down statues of “ slave owners ” like Washington and Jefferson .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ infamous historical slave owner , their enthusiasm suddenly waned .
“ I want to take down a statue of Muhammad , the founder of Islam , because he also owned slaves , ” Horowitz tells a black woman .
“ OK , I don ’ t want to sign this , ” she responds .
Every other person in the clip refuses to sign the petition to remove statues of Muhammad .
Asked why people are signing the petition to take down Washington ’ s statue but not the one applying to Muhammad @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s because of “ religious freedom.
” Obviously , there are no statues of the Prophet Muhammad , but nobody is calling for mosques to be demolished , despite the fact that Muhammad owned slaves .
As the BBC highlights , “ The Prophet Muhammad did not try to abolish slavery , and bought , sold , captured , and owned slaves himself.
” However , the rest of the article strenuously argues that because Muhammad treated his slaves well and encouraged others to do the same , that this made his slave @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wouldn ’ t go down as well when applied to Washington or Jefferson .
The social experiment underscores how slave ownership is almost certainly not the real reason for leftists wanting to see statues of Washington and Jefferson toppled .
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever .
It is CRUCIAL that you support me .
Please sign up for the free newsletter here .
Donate to me on SubscribeStar here .
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean @ @ @ @ @

A social experiment by Ami Horowitz shows New Yorkers gleefully signing a petition to take down statues of “slave owners” like George Washington, but suddenly becoming reticent when Horowitz mentions the Prophet Muhammad.
“I want to take down all statues of people who owned slaves in this country,” Horowitz told potential signatories, emphasizing how he wanted to remove the statue of George Washington in DC.
All of the people featured in the video gleefully signed the petition to take down statues of “slave owners” like Washington and Jefferson.
However, when it came to another infamous historical slave owner, their enthusiasm suddenly waned.
“I want to take down a statue of Muhammad, the founder of Islam, because he also owned slaves,” Horowitz tells a black woman.
“OK, I don’t want to sign this,” she responds.
Every other person in the clip refuses to sign the petition to remove statues of Muhammad.
Asked why people are signing the petition to take down Washington’s statue but not the one applying to Muhammad, one man argues that it’s because of “religious freedom.”
“But slavery’s not part of religious freedom,” responds Horowitz.
Obviously, there are no statues of the Prophet Muhammad, but nobody is calling for mosques to be demolished, despite the fact that Muhammad owned slaves.
As the BBC highlights, “The Prophet Muhammad did not try to abolish slavery, and bought, sold, captured, and owned slaves himself.”
However, the rest of the article strenuously argues that because Muhammad treated his slaves well and encouraged others to do the same, that this made his slave ownership acceptable.
The same justification probably wouldn’t go down as well when applied to Washington or Jefferson.
The social experiment underscores how slave ownership is almost certainly not the real reason for leftists wanting to see statues of Washington and Jefferson toppled.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: Follow @PrisonPlanet
———————————————————————————————————————
My voice is being silenced by free speech-hating Silicon Valley behemoths who want me disappeared forever. It is CRUCIAL that you support me.
Please sign up for the free newsletter here. Donate to me on SubscribeStar here.
Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.
———————————————————————————————————————