humansarefree--2020-07-31--‘Charity’ Accused of Sex Abuse is Coordinating ID2020’s  Program for Refugee Newborns

A biometric identification program backed by the ID2020 alliance will see its new “ digital id ” program rolled out for refugee newborns in close coordination with a charity tied to Wall Street and prominent Western politicians whose workers have been accused of sexually exploiting refugee children .
iRespond , an international non-profit organization that is “ dedicated to using biometrics to improve lives through digital identity , ” has begun piloting a new biometric program for newborns among the predominately Karen refugee population along the Myanmar-Thailand border , a program it soon hopes to “ quickly deploy ” at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the general global population .
The pilot program is being conducted as part of the controversial ID2020 alliance , backed by Microsoft , the GAVI vaccine alliance and the Rockefeller Foundation , and with the International Rescue Committee ( IRC ) , a non-profit organization deeply tied to the Western political elite and Wall Street with a controversial track record of silencing numerous sex abuse and fraud allegations .
The new program , an extension of iRespond ’ s “ voluntary ” biometric identification program in the Mae La refugee camp , “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , attested by a trusted clinic , with a goal of changing the life trajectory for the participants.
” Through the program , “ a guardianship relationship between the newborn and the mother is established and linked to digital and high security physical identity documents.
” However , iRespond ’ s CEO , Scott Reid , told Biometric Update that these credentials do “ not carry the same weight as a true birth certificate , ” but asserts that the organization ’ s biometric “ birth attestation ” program “ could leapfrog the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the fact that iRespond ’ s quasi-birth certificates would seemingly serve little purpose in areas where actual birth certificates are readily available , the organization notes that “ once the pilot is completed , iRespond is ready to quickly deploy the solution at scale ” for mass use around the globe .
“ Product development ” on adapting their platform for newborns began earlier this year and Reid notes that having an iRespond-provided biometric “ birth attestation ” will enable “ access to vital services such as healthcare , social protection , education @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being conducted at the Mae Tao clinic , which is largely funded by the CIA cut-out USAID as well as the governments of Germany and Taiwan , the Open Society Foundations and the International Rescue Committee ( IRC ) .
The IRC is very active in the day-to-day functions of the clinic ( financed by a USAID-funded project ) and it is also intimately involved in iRespond ’ s digital identity program , including its new pilot program for newborns and its earlier efforts to supply Mae La ’ s residents with biometric @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mae La in conjunction with IRC was first announced by the ID2020 alliance in September 2018 .
The ID2020-funded pilot program , the announcement states , was to be “ led by Alliance partner iRespond and will be conducted in close partnership with the International Rescue Committee ( IRC ) .
” It aims to provide biometric identities to the approximately 35,000 individuals inhabiting the area , with the newer program aiming to ensure that babies born in the community are also made participants by default upon birth .
It notes specifically that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ identification , linked to individual users through iris recognition , for refugees accessing the IRC ’ s services in the Mae La Camp in Thailand.
” Having a “ digital identity ” would allow refugees “ to access improved , consistent healthcare within the camp ” with plans for the same system to eventually “ electronically document both educational attainment and professional skills to aid with employment opportunities.
” A year later , the program , featured in a lengthy profile in Newsweek , was revealed to be “ just the first step @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the camp ’ s entire refugee population with secure and portable “ digital wallets ” that will hold not just their medical records but also educational and vocational credentials , camp work histories and myriad other records , ” ostensibly including financial activity .
This is particularly likely given that iRespond is partnered with Mastercard , another ID2020 partner that is closely allied with the company , Trust Stamp , a biometric identity platform that also doubles as a vaccine record and payment system .
In addition , IRC ’ s strategic plans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ expand [ ing ] micro-enterprise development and village savings and loans associations , ” such as those offered by ID2020 partner Kiva , among others , who link biometric identity to the receipt of loans .
iRespond ’ s system , not unlike Trust Stamp ’ s , is also slated to serve as a vaccine record .
Larry Dohr , iRespond ’ s head of Southeast Asia operations , told Reuters in April that “ a biometric ID system can keep a record of such people [ who have previously tested positive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine.
” Dohr added that “ we can biometrically identify the individual and tie them to the test results , as well as to a high security document .
The person then has ‘ non-refutable ’ proof that they have immunity due to antibodies in their system.
” Dohr then refers to such “ proof ” as a “ very valuable credential.
” Notably , in press releases and news reports , iRespond executives emphasize how their biometric identity system , based on iris scans and powered by Microsoft , will “ protect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ownership of identity data belong to the holder.
” However , the Mae La project does not offer this degree of control and ownership , with Newsweek noting that “ Eventually , [ iRespond and their collaborators ] aim to offer the refugees a level of fine-grained control over what pieces of personal information are shared with others.
” In other words , such control over their personal information has not yet been made available to them , despite the public portrayal that this functionality is a base component of iRespond ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ iRespond ’ s and IRC ’ s digital identity efforts is that , while it is a “ voluntary ” program , destitute refugees wishing to access healthcare and other services IRC provides in the area , including access to clean water , must have their irises scanned in order to reap those benefits .
It is highly unlikely that such individuals are not only uninformed about any potential risks of providing their biometrics for use in a pilot program , but are not in a stable enough state to make an informed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ precarious position would see them choose urgent healthcare needs , etc .
over privacy .
It increasingly seems that Mae La was chosen as the pilot project because its residents were highly unlikely to decline participation , especially when healthcare access and other basic needs provided by IRC are dangled as carrots on a stick and only accessible upon participation in iRespond ’ s biometric identity program .
This program is remarkably similar to the World Food Programme ’ s recently implemented “ Building Blocks ” initiative , which is funded by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ governments .
Building Blocks uses a blockchain-based biometric identity system “ to expand refugees ’ choices in how they access and spend their cash assistance ” in Syrian refugee camps within Jordan .
Now , “ over 100,000 people living in the camps can purchase groceries by scanning an iris at checkout ” as part of the checkout .
Those who do not participate are unable to access their WFP “ cash benefits ” since they are available exclusively through this biometric system , leaving refugees the choice between surrendering their biometric data @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fact that those financially supporting the Mae La project and similar projects , particularly the ID2020 alliance , are “ hopeful ” that iRespond ’ s efforts in Mae La will some day be rolled out on a global scale .
Indeed , Newsweek noted that “ many of the funders [ of the Mae La project ] — part of what ’ s known as the ID2020 alliance , which includes Accenture , Microsoft and the Rockefeller Foundation — hope the Mae La project could eventually serve as a blueprint for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , as well as citizens of developed nations and everyone else.
” According to iRespond ’ s rather spartan website , their biometric identity platform “ primarily relies on iris biometrics , the best modality after DNA for accuracy and reliability.
” It further describes its platform as follows : “ When a new participant is enrolled , an encrypted biometric template is created from their iris scan and a randomly assigned 12-digit number is drawn from a pool of 90 billion numbers .
On subsequent visits , the identity of the participant @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the system returns the original 12-digit unique identifier.
” iRespond ’ s platform also “ easily integrates into healthcare , humanitarian aid , research , and human-rights applications , ” and it has been used to grant refugees and other vulnerable populations access to food , healthcare , and other forms of aid provided by foreign NGOs operating in these areas .
It has also been used to keep track of participants in clinical drug trials .
iRespond ’ s platform in the latter case was used by the U.S. Center for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in conjunction with Johns Hopkins School of Public Health ( both are iRespond partners ) , to track participants in clinical HIV treatment trials in Senegal as well as an additional Johns Hopkins study in South Africa .
It has also been used to track recipients of the controversial HPV vaccine in Sierra Leone , where it was used “ to track patients who have not completed their vaccination series.
” It is also being used among “ vulnerable groups ” in Myanmar by the NGO Population Services International ( PSI ) to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ positive HIV tests.
” By analyzing these details , “ we uncover which groups are most vulnerable to becoming infected , ” according to PSI ’ s country representative for Myanmar .
The non-profit ’ s platform is powered by its main tech partner and another ID2020 member , Microsoft .
iRespond ’ s platform “ couldn ’ t exist without the cloud , ” according to its CEO Scott Reid , and Microsoft supplies iRespond with a $ 60,000 grant to its Azure cloud system , allowing the organization to use it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Microsoft donated 39 tablets to iRespond that are used by the organization in the various places it operates “ to enable flexibility in the field.
” “ The number of people we have helped has rapidly gone from the tens of thousands to the hundreds of thousands , and we look forward to soon working on behalf of many millions of people .
These Microsoft tools are helping to make it possible , ” iRespond ’ s Larry Dohr stated in a Microsoft profile .
Eric Rasmussen , iRespond ’ s president and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ particularly interesting character who has been quite frank about the rationale behind the creation of iRespond .
“ When you understand who someone is , you understand what they ’ re entitled to , whether that ’ s national citizenship , international refugee support , or simply food distributions , ” Rasmussen told Microsoft last year .
In addition to his key role at iRespond , Rasmussen is a professor at the Google-backed “ Singularity University ” as well as chairman of the board at InSTEDD , a “ global NGO specializing humanitarian @ @ @ @ @ @ @ economies ” that is partnered with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation , the Rockefeller Foundation , the CDC , Google and UNICEF .
In addition , Rasmussen is also the CEO of a “ profit-for-purpose ” company called Infinitum Humanitarian Systems ( IHS ) .
IHS works closely with USAID and the State Department as well as U.S. military intelligence agencies and intelligence/defense contractor Booz Allen Hamilton .
Prior to his roles at iRespond , IHS and InSTEDD , Rasmussen was the Principal Investigator in humanitarian informatics for the Pentagon ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) and made multiple war time deployments to Bosnia , Iraq and Afghanistan .
More troubling than the background and associations of iRespond are those of their partner in the recently announced newborn biometric identification initiative , the International Rescue Committee ( IRC ) .
The IRC describes themselves as responding “ to the world ’ s worst humanitarian crises and help [ ing ] people whose lives and livelihoods are shattered by conflict and disaster to survive , recover and gain control of their future.
” Despite the IRC framing itself as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ board is stuffed with a sordid mix of Wall Street criminals and war criminals .
For example , its board is co-chaired by Timothy Geithner , former Treasury Secretary during the 2008 financial crisis bail-outs and current President of Wall Street titan Warburg-Pincus , and Susan Susman , an Executive Vice President at Pfizer .
Its board of advisers includes war criminals Henry Kissinger and Madeleine Albright as well as Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell .
Also present are current and former leaders and top executives at McKinsey , Morgan Stanley , Goldman @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CIA of Wall Street ” ) , PepsiCo , Bank of America , Lehman Brothers , Citigroup and the World Bank .
Another advisor is former chairman and CEO of AIG Maurice “ Hank ” Greenberg , a name that will likely be familiar to those who have researched the September 11th attacks and Wall Street financial crimes in general .
Since 2013 , the IRC has been led by David Miliband , the Tony Blair “ protégé ” who Bill Clinton once called “ one of the ablest , most creative public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worked closely with then-U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton while serving as the U.K. ’ s Foreign Secretary .
So close was Miliband to the Clintons , that he was being considered for a “ top U.S. government job ” if Hillary Clinton had won the 2016 election .
In the years since joining the IRC , Miliband ’ s salary as the group ’ s president has ballooned to nearly a million dollars annually ( up from approximately $ 240,000 when he arrived at the organization in 2013 ) .
In addition @ @ @ @ @ @ @ scandal since Miliband became its president .
For instance , it was revealed in 2018 that IRC was one of several U.K.-based charities where “ workers [ were ] alleged to be in sexually exploitative relationships with refugee children ” including through “ sex-for-food scandals ” where “ sexual abuse was so endemic that the only way for many refugee families to survive was to allow a teenage girl to be exploited.
” Reports further alleged that IRC and other charities named in the report , including Save the Children , had known @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the allegations being made public and chose not to act .
That year , it was also found that the IRC had “ silenced 37 sex abuse , fraud and bribery allegations , ” resulting in the U.K. government , which had previously funneled millions to the organization , cutting off its funding entirely .
Despite the troubling revelations , no IRC workers accused of wrong-doing were ever prosecuted .
Given the fact that the IRC ’ s board and presidency is stuffed with professional exploiters , from Wall Street to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that this “ charity ” would be caught doing the same under the guise of providing “ aid ” to the world ’ s most vulnerable populations , who they apparently view as easy prey .
In the several media profiles of the iRespond-IRC biometric identity effort , the initiative is described as helping to prevent the exploitation of the world ’ s most vulnerable , particularly forced labor and sex trafficking .
However , if that really were the case , why is this program being executed by iRespond , whose president @ @ @ @ @ @ @ U.S. military and intelligence communities , and the IRC , backed by a legion of war criminals and financial predators ?
The U.S. military , a close partner of iRespond ’ s Eric Rasmussen , is notorious for its role in the trafficking of persons for forced labor , while many of its key contractors – like DynCorp — have been the subject of numerous scandalsregarding the sexual abuse or sex trafficking of war-torn or otherwise vulnerable populations .
On the other hand , the IRC ’ s mix of backers like Madeleine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the murder by sanctions of half a million Iraqi children being “ worth it , ” and Henry Kissinger , notorious for his words about using food as a weapon to force populations into subservience and to reduce third-world populations , is equally anathema to the publicly professed purpose of the iRespond-IRC biometric identification program .
Not unlike the “ sex-for-food ” scandal in which IRC was once embroiled , this new initiative is placing refugees in the position of taking part in a massive technocratic experiment if they wish to eat or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not as egregious as a sex crime , it is nonetheless another means of exploiting the world ’ s most vulnerable populations under the guise of “ helping ” them , when those really being aided are the technocratic elite who aim to take this biometric identification program global in short order .

A biometric identification program backed by the ID2020 alliance will see its new “digital id” program rolled out for refugee newborns in close coordination with a charity tied to Wall Street and prominent Western politicians whose workers have been accused of sexually exploiting refugee children.
by Whitney Webb
iRespond, an international non-profit organization that is “dedicated to using biometrics to improve lives through digital identity,” has begun piloting a new biometric program for newborns among the predominately Karen refugee population along the Myanmar-Thailand border, a program it soon hopes to “quickly deploy” at a greater scale and make available to the general global population.
The pilot program is being conducted as part of the controversial ID2020 alliance, backed by Microsoft, the GAVI jjab alliance and the Rockefeller Foundation, and with the International Rescue Committee (IRC), a non-profit organization deeply tied to the Western political elite and Wall Street with a controversial track record of silencing numerous sex abuse and fraud allegations.
The new program, an extension of iRespond’s “voluntary” biometric identification program in the Mae La refugee camp, “will create a record of a birth, attested by a trusted clinic, with a goal of changing the life trajectory for the participants.”
Through the program, “a guardianship relationship between the newborn and the mother is established and linked to digital and high security physical identity documents.”
However, iRespond’s CEO, Scott Reid, told Biometric Update that these credentials do “not carry the same weight as a true birth certificate,” but asserts that the organization’s biometric “birth attestation” program “could leapfrog the traditional barriers to establishing identity.”
Despite the fact that iRespond’s quasi-birth certificates would seemingly serve little purpose in areas where actual birth certificates are readily available, the organization notes that “once the pilot is completed, iRespond is ready to quickly deploy the solution at scale” for mass use around the globe.
“Product development” on adapting their platform for newborns began earlier this year and Reid notes that having an iRespond-provided biometric “birth attestation” will enable “access to vital services such as healthcare, social protection, education and banking.”
The pilot program is being conducted at the Mae Tao clinic, which is largely funded by the CIA cut-out USAID as well as the governments of Germany and Taiwan, the Open Society Foundations and the International Rescue Committee (IRC).
The IRC is very active in the day-to-day functions of the clinic (financed by a USAID-funded project) and it is also intimately involved in iRespond’s digital identity program, including its new pilot program for newborns and its earlier efforts to supply Mae La’s residents with biometric identity.
Food or Sovereignty
iRespond’s work in Mae La in conjunction with IRC was first announced by the ID2020 alliance in September 2018. The ID2020-funded pilot program, the announcement states, was to be “led by Alliance partner iRespond and will be conducted in close partnership with the International Rescue Committee (IRC).”
It aims to provide biometric identities to the approximately 35,000 individuals inhabiting the area, with the newer program aiming to ensure that babies born in the community are also made participants by default upon birth. It notes specifically that “the pilot will offer blockchain-based digital identification, linked to individual users through iris recognition, for refugees accessing the IRC’s services in the Mae La Camp in Thailand.”
Having a “digital identity” would allow refugees “to access improved, consistent healthcare within the camp” with plans for the same system to eventually “electronically document both educational attainment and professional skills to aid with employment opportunities.”
A year later, the program, featured in a lengthy profile in Newsweek, was revealed to be “just the first step in an effort that aims to equip the camp’s entire refugee population with secure and portable “digital wallets” that will hold not just their medical records but also educational and vocational credentials, camp work histories and myriad other records,” ostensibly including financial activity.
This is particularly likely given that iRespond is partnered with Mastercard, another ID2020 partner that is closely allied with the company, Trust Stamp, a biometric identity platform that also doubles as a jjab record and payment system.
In addition, IRC’s strategic plans for Mae La through 2020 include “expand[ing] micro-enterprise development and village savings and loans associations,” such as those offered by ID2020 partner Kiva, among others, who link biometric identity to the receipt of loans.
iRespond’s system, not unlike Trust Stamp’s, is also slated to serve as a jjab record. Larry Dohr, iRespond’s head of Southeast Asia operations, told Reuters in April that “a biometric ID system can keep a record of such people [who have previously tested positive for Covid-19] and those getting the jjab.”
Dohr added that “we can biometrically identify the individual and tie them to the test results, as well as to a high security document. The person then has ‘non-refutable’ proof that they have immunity due to antibodies in their system.” Dohr then refers to such “proof” as a “very valuable credential.”
Notably, in press releases and news reports, iRespond executives emphasize how their biometric identity system, based on iris scans and powered by Microsoft, will “protect privacy” and allow “control and ownership of identity data belong to the holder.”
However, the Mae La project does not offer this degree of control and ownership, with Newsweek noting that “Eventually, [iRespond and their collaborators] aim to offer the refugees a level of fine-grained control over what pieces of personal information are shared with others.”
In other words, such control over their personal information has not yet been made available to them, despite the public portrayal that this functionality is a base component of iRespond’s system.
What is particularly noteworthy about iRespond’s and IRC’s digital identity efforts is that, while it is a “voluntary” program, destitute refugees wishing to access healthcare and other services IRC provides in the area, including access to clean water, must have their irises scanned in order to reap those benefits.
It is highly unlikely that such individuals are not only uninformed about any potential risks of providing their biometrics for use in a pilot program, but are not in a stable enough state to make an informed decision on the matter, as their precarious position would see them choose urgent healthcare needs, etc. over privacy.
It increasingly seems that Mae La was chosen as the pilot project because its residents were highly unlikely to decline participation, especially when healthcare access and other basic needs provided by IRC are dangled as carrots on a stick and only accessible upon participation in iRespond’s biometric identity program.
This program is remarkably similar to the World Food Programme’s recently implemented “Building Blocks” initiative, which is funded by the US, German, Dutch and Luxembourgian governments. Building Blocks uses a blockchain-based biometric identity system “to expand refugees’ choices in how they access and spend their cash assistance” in Syrian refugee camps within Jordan.
Now, “over 100,000 people living in the camps can purchase groceries by scanning an iris at checkout” as part of the checkout. Those who do not participate are unable to access their WFP “cash benefits” since they are available exclusively through this biometric system, leaving refugees the choice between surrendering their biometric data and food.
Equally noteworthy is the fact that those financially supporting the Mae La project and similar projects, particularly the ID2020 alliance, are “hopeful” that iRespond’s efforts in Mae La will some day be rolled out on a global scale.
Indeed, Newsweek noted that “many of the funders [of the Mae La project] — part of what’s known as the ID2020 alliance, which includes Accenture, Microsoft and the Rockefeller Foundation — hope the Mae La project could eventually serve as a blueprint for the world’s millions of stateless people, as well as citizens of developed nations and everyone else.”
Biometric Enclosure
According to iRespond’s rather spartan website, their biometric identity platform “primarily relies on iris biometrics, the best modality after DNA for accuracy and reliability.” It further describes its platform as follows:
“When a new participant is enrolled, an encrypted biometric template is created from their iris scan and a randomly assigned 12-digit number is drawn from a pool of 90 billion numbers. On subsequent visits, the identity of the participant is verified when their template is matched and the system returns the original 12-digit unique identifier.”
iRespond’s platform also “easily integrates into healthcare, humanitarian aid, research, and human-rights applications,” and it has been used to grant refugees and other vulnerable populations access to food, healthcare, and other forms of aid provided by foreign NGOs operating in these areas. It has also been used to keep track of participants in clinical drug trials.
iRespond’s platform in the latter case was used by the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in conjunction with Johns Hopkins School of Public Health (both are iRespond partners), to track participants in clinical HIV treatment trials in Senegal as well as an additional Johns Hopkins study in South Africa.
It has also been used to track recipients of the controversial HPV jjab in Sierra Leone, where it was used “to track patients who have not completed their vaccination series.”
It is also being used among “vulnerable groups” in Myanmar by the NGO Population Services International (PSI) to “track demographics and the timing of positive HIV tests.” By analyzing these details, “we uncover which groups are most vulnerable to becoming infected,” according to PSI’s country representative for Myanmar.
The non-profit’s platform is powered by its main tech partner and another ID2020 member, Microsoft. iRespond’s platform “couldn’t exist without the cloud,” according to its CEO Scott Reid, and Microsoft supplies iRespond with a $60,000 grant to its Azure cloud system, allowing the organization to use it free of charge.
In addition, Microsoft donated 39 tablets to iRespond that are used by the organization in the various places it operates “to enable flexibility in the field.”
“The number of people we have helped has rapidly gone from the tens of thousands to the hundreds of thousands, and we look forward to soon working on behalf of many millions of people. These Microsoft tools are helping to make it possible,” iRespond’s Larry Dohr stated in a Microsoft profile.
Eric Rasmussen, iRespond’s president and chairman of the board, is a particularly interesting character who has been quite frank about the rationale behind the creation of iRespond.
“When you understand who someone is, you understand what they’re entitled to, whether that’s national citizenship, international refugee support, or simply food distributions,” Rasmussen told Microsoft last year.
In addition to his key role at iRespond, Rasmussen is a professor at the Google-backed “Singularity University” as well as chairman of the board at InSTEDD, a “global NGO specializing humanitarian informatics, particularly around health in resource-poor economies” that is partnered with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, the CDC, Google and UNICEF.
In addition, Rasmussen is also the CEO of a “profit-for-purpose” company called Infinitum Humanitarian Systems (IHS). IHS works closely with USAID and the State Department as well as U.S. military intelligence agencies and intelligence/defense contractor Booz Allen Hamilton.
Prior to his roles at iRespond, IHS and InSTEDD, Rasmussen was the Principal Investigator in humanitarian informatics for the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and made multiple war time deployments to Bosnia, Iraq and Afghanistan.
“Charity” of the Predator Class
More troubling than the background and associations of iRespond are those of their partner in the recently announced newborn biometric identification initiative, the International Rescue Committee (IRC). The IRC describes themselves as responding “to the world’s worst humanitarian crises and help[ing] people whose lives and livelihoods are shattered by conflict and disaster to survive, recover and gain control of their future.”
Despite the IRC framing itself as a “humanitarian” venture, its board is stuffed with a sordid mix of Wall Street criminals and war criminals. For example, its board is co-chaired by Timothy Geithner, former Treasury Secretary during the 2008 financial crisis bail-outs and current President of Wall Street titan Warburg-Pincus, and Susan Susman, an Executive Vice President at Pfizer.
Its board of advisers includes war criminals Henry Kissinger and Madeleine Albright as well as Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell. Also present are current and former leaders and top executives at McKinsey, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, Kroll Associates (“the CIA of Wall Street”), PepsiCo, Bank of America, Lehman Brothers, Citigroup and the World Bank.
Another advisor is former chairman and CEO of AIG Maurice “Hank” Greenberg, a name that will likely be familiar to those who have researched the September 11th attacks and Wall Street financial crimes in general.
Since 2013, the IRC has been led by David Miliband, the Tony Blair “protégé” who Bill Clinton once called “one of the ablest, most creative public servants of our time” and who worked closely with then-U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton while serving as the U.K.’s Foreign Secretary.
So close was Miliband to the Clintons, that he was being considered for a “top U.S. government job” if Hillary Clinton had won the 2016 election.
In the years since joining the IRC, Miliband’s salary as the group’s president has ballooned to nearly a million dollars annually (up from approximately $240,000 when he arrived at the organization in 2013). In addition, the group has been mired in scandal since Miliband became its president.
For instance, it was revealed in 2018 that IRC was one of several U.K.-based charities where “workers [were] alleged to be in sexually exploitative relationships with refugee children” including through “sex-for-food scandals” where “sexual abuse was so endemic that the only way for many refugee families to survive was to allow a teenage girl to be exploited.”
Reports further alleged that IRC and other charities named in the report, including Save the Children, had known of the egregious abuse for years prior to the allegations being made public and chose not to act.
That year, it was also found that the IRC had “silenced 37 sex abuse, fraud and bribery allegations,” resulting in the U.K. government, which had previously funneled millions to the organization, cutting off its funding entirely. Despite the troubling revelations, no IRC workers accused of wrong-doing were ever prosecuted.
Given the fact that the IRC’s board and presidency is stuffed with professional exploiters, from Wall Street to the public sector, it is hardly surprising that this “charity” would be caught doing the same under the guise of providing “aid” to the world’s most vulnerable populations, who they apparently view as easy prey.
Foxes in the Hen House
In the several media profiles of the iRespond-IRC biometric identity effort, the initiative is described as helping to prevent the exploitation of the world’s most vulnerable, particularly forced labor and sex trafficking.
However, if that really were the case, why is this program being executed by iRespond, whose president and chairman has close ties to the U.S. military and intelligence communities, and the IRC, backed by a legion of war criminals and financial predators?
The U.S. military, a close partner of iRespond’s Eric Rasmussen, is notorious for its role in the trafficking of persons for forced labor, while many of its key contractors – like DynCorp — have been the subject of numerous scandalsregarding the sexual abuse or sex trafficking of war-torn or otherwise vulnerable populations.
On the other hand, the IRC’s mix of backers like Madeleine Albright, infamous for her comment on the murder by sanctions of half a million Iraqi children being “worth it,” and Henry Kissinger, notorious for his words about using food as a weapon to force populations into subservience and to reduce third-world populations, is equally anathema to the publicly professed purpose of the iRespond-IRC biometric identification program.
Not unlike the “sex-for-food” scandal in which IRC was once embroiled, this new initiative is placing refugees in the position of taking part in a massive technocratic experiment if they wish to eat or access other basic services.
Though certainly not as egregious as a sex crime, it is nonetheless another means of exploiting the world’s most vulnerable populations under the guise of “helping” them, when those really being aided are the technocratic elite who aim to take this biometric identification program global in short order.


humansarefree--2020-07-31--The Ultimate Divide and Conquer: A Campaign of Mass Psychological Terrorism

“ It has frequently been observed that terror can rule absolutely only over people who are isolated against each other and that therefore one of the primary concerns of tyrannical government is to bring this isolation about .
“ Isolation may be the beginning of terror ; it certainly is its most fertile ground ; it always is its result .
This isolation is , as it were , pretotalitarian ; its hallmark is impotence insofar as power always comes from people acting together , acting in concert ; isolated people are powerless by definition.
” – Hannah Arendt , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ led by the US government and media , has embarked upon a campaign of mass psychological terrorism designed to cover for the collapsing economy , set up a new pretext for Wall Street ’ s ongoing plunder expedition , radically escalate the police state , deeply traumatize people into submission to total social conformity , and radically aggravate the anti-social , anti-human atomization of the people .
The pretext for this abomination is an epidemic which objectively is comparable to the seasonal flu and is caused by the same kind of Coronavirus we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rampages and mass insanity .
The global evidence is converging on the facts : This flu is somewhat more contagious than the norm and is especially dangerous for those who are aged and already in poor health from pre-existing maladies .
It is not especially dangerous for the rest of the population .
The whole concept of “ lockdowns ” is exactly upside down , exactly the wrong way any sane society would respond to this circumstance .
It ’ s the vulnerable who should be shielded while nature takes its course among @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about life as usual .
Dominionist-technocratic rigidity can ’ t prevent an epidemic from cycling through the population in spite of the delusions of that religion , especially since Western societies began their measures far too late anyway .
So it ’ s best to let herd immunity develop as fast as it naturally will , at which time the virus recedes from lack of hosts ( and is likely to mutate in a milder direction along the way ) .
This is the only way to bring a safer environment for all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that most societies have rejected the sane , scientific route in favor of doomed-to-fail attempts at a forcible violent segregation and sterilization is proof that governments aren ’ t concerned with the public health ( as if we didn ’ t know that already from a thousand policies of poisoning the environment while gutting the health care system ) , but are very ardent to use this crisis they artificially generated in order radically to escalate their police state power toward totalitarian goals .
The whole concept of self-isolation and anti-social “ distancing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over millions of years to be social creatures living in tight-knit groups .
Although modern societies ideologically and socioeconomically work to massify and atomize people , nevertheless almost all of us still seek close human companionship in our lives .
This terror campaign seeks to blast to pieces any remaining human closeness , which means any remaining humanity as such , the better to isolate individual atoms for subjection to total domination .
Arendt wrote profoundly on this goal of totalitarian governments , though even she didn ’ t envision a state-driven cult @ @ @ @ @ @ @ atom from every other atom .
So far the people are submitting completely to a terror campaign dedicated to the total eradication of whatever community was left in the world , and especially whatever community was starting to be rebuilt .
Some dream of this terror campaign somehow bringing about a magical collective transformation .
They don ’ t explain how that is supposed to happen when everyone ’ s so terrorized they ’ re desperate to detach physically from their own shadows , let alone physically come together with other people .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ action , any kind of movement-building , requires close person-to-person contact .
It seems that for most erstwhile self-alleged dissidents , the fact that social media is no substitute for face-to-face organizing and group action , a fact hitherto universally acknowledged by these dissidents , is another truth suddenly to be jettisoned replaced by its complete antithesis .
Thus the terror campaign is a virus causing those it infects to abdicate all activism and all prospect for all future activism , for as long as they remain insane with the fever of this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ evoking despair , the terror campaign is a virus causing those it infects to fear and loathe all human contact , all companionship , all closeness , all things which ever made us human in the first place .
Prior totalitarian regimes sought this lack of contact and trust through networks of informers .
These networks are part of today ’ s terror campaign as well , encouraged from above and spontaneously arising from below as a result of the feeling of terror as well as the exercise of prior petty-evil intentions on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ today ’ s totalitarian potential is far worse than this .
Now the regimes aspiring to total domination have terrorized and brainwashed the vast majority of people into an automatic physical distrust of all other people .
One no longer fears that someone is an informer , but fears the very existence of another human being .
Any kind of human relations , from personal friendship and romance to friendly social gatherings and clubs to social and cultural movements become impossible under such circumstances .
This threatens to be the end of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be replaced by an anthill of slave atoms with no consciousness beyond fear and the most animal concern for food and shelter , which already is allowed or denied in the same way experimenters do with lab rats .
And the more people fear and loathe the literal physical existence of all other people , the more the situation becomes ripe for every epidemic of murder , from the spiking rate of domestic violence and killings to incipient lynch mobs to pogroms to Nazi-style extermination campaigns .
This is the system ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ logical end where every trend of today leads .
All of it is trumped up over an epidemic which objectively is a flu season somewhat rougher than average .
Why do the people want to surrender and throw away all reality and future prospect of shared humanity , happiness , freedom , well-being , over so little ?
Is this really a terminal totalitarian death cult , the globe as one massive Jonestown ?
So far it seems this is what the majority wants .
If they don ’ t really want this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ emotion and body , they ’ d better snap out of their terror-induced mental delirium fast , before it ’ s too late .

“It has frequently been observed that terror can rule absolutely only over people who are isolated against each other and that therefore one of the primary concerns of tyrannical government is to bring this isolation about.
“Isolation may be the beginning of terror; it certainly is its most fertile ground; it always is its result. This isolation is, as it were, pretotalitarian; its hallmark is impotence insofar as power always comes from people acting together, acting in concert; isolated people are powerless by definition.” – Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism
Western civilization, led by the US government and media, has embarked upon a campaign of mass psychological terrorism designed to cover for the collapsing economy, set up a new pretext for Wall Street’s ongoing plunder expedition, radically escalate the police state, deeply traumatize people into submission to total social conformity, and radically aggravate the anti-social, anti-human atomization of the people.
The pretext for this abomination is an epidemic which objectively is comparable to the seasonal flu and is caused by the same kind of Coronavirus we’ve endured so long without totalitarian rampages and mass insanity.
The global evidence is converging on the facts: This flu is somewhat more contagious than the norm and is especially dangerous for those who are aged and already in poor health from pre-existing maladies. It is not especially dangerous for the rest of the population.
The whole concept of “lockdowns” is exactly upside down, exactly the wrong way any sane society would respond to this circumstance.
It’s the vulnerable who should be shielded while nature takes its course among the general population, who should go about life as usual.
Dominionist-technocratic rigidity can’t prevent an epidemic from cycling through the population in spite of the delusions of that religion, especially since Western societies began their measures far too late anyway.
So it’s best to let herd immunity develop as fast as it naturally will, at which time the virus recedes from lack of hosts (and is likely to mutate in a milder direction along the way). This is the only way to bring a safer environment for all including the most vulnerable.
The fact that most societies have rejected the sane, scientific route in favor of doomed-to-fail attempts at a forcible violent segregation and sterilization is proof that governments aren’t concerned with the public health (as if we didn’t know that already from a thousand policies of poisoning the environment while gutting the health care system), but are very ardent to use this crisis they artificially generated in order radically to escalate their police state power toward totalitarian goals.
The whole concept of self-isolation and anti-social “distancing” is radically anti-human. We evolved over millions of years to be social creatures living in tight-knit groups. Although modern societies ideologically and socioeconomically work to massify and atomize people, nevertheless almost all of us still seek close human companionship in our lives.
(I suspect most of the internet police-state-mongers are not only fascists at heart but are confirmed misanthropic loners who couldn’t care less about human closeness.)
This terror campaign seeks to blast to pieces any remaining human closeness, which means any remaining humanity as such, the better to isolate individual atoms for subjection to total domination.
Arendt wrote profoundly on this goal of totalitarian governments, though even she didn’t envision a state-driven cult of the literal physical repulsion of every atom from every other atom.
So far the people are submitting completely to a terror campaign dedicated to the total eradication of whatever community was left in the world, and especially whatever community was starting to be rebuilt.
Some dream of this terror campaign somehow bringing about a magical collective transformation.
They don’t explain how that is supposed to happen when everyone’s so terrorized they’re desperate to detach physically from their own shadows, let alone physically come together with other people.
But any kind of political or social action, any kind of movement-building, requires close person-to-person contact.
It seems that for most erstwhile self-alleged dissidents, the fact that social media is no substitute for face-to-face organizing and group action, a fact hitherto universally acknowledged by these dissidents, is another truth suddenly to be jettisoned replaced by its complete antithesis.
Thus the terror campaign is a virus causing those it infects to abdicate all activism and all prospect for all future activism, for as long as they remain insane with the fever of this propaganda terror.
Far more profoundly and evoking despair, the terror campaign is a virus causing those it infects to fear and loathe all human contact, all companionship, all closeness, all things which ever made us human in the first place.
Prior totalitarian regimes sought this lack of contact and trust through networks of informers.
These networks are part of today’s terror campaign as well, encouraged from above and spontaneously arising from below as a result of the feeling of terror as well as the exercise of prior petty-evil intentions on the part of petty-evil individuals.
But today’s totalitarian potential is far worse than this. Now the regimes aspiring to total domination have terrorized and brainwashed the vast majority of people into an automatic physical distrust of all other people. One no longer fears that someone is an informer, but fears the very existence of another human being.
Any kind of human relations, from personal friendship and romance to friendly social gatherings and clubs to social and cultural movements become impossible under such circumstances.
This threatens to be the end of the very concept of shared humanity, to be replaced by an anthill of slave atoms with no consciousness beyond fear and the most animal concern for food and shelter, which already is allowed or denied in the same way experimenters do with lab rats.
And the more people fear and loathe the literal physical existence of all other people, the more the situation becomes ripe for every epidemic of murder, from the spiking rate of domestic violence and killings to incipient lynch mobs to pogroms to Nazi-style extermination campaigns.
This is the system’s end goal. It’s the logical end where every trend of today leads. All of it is trumped up over an epidemic which objectively is a flu season somewhat rougher than average.
Why do the people want to surrender and throw away all reality and future prospect of shared humanity, happiness, freedom, well-being, over so little? Is this really a terminal totalitarian death cult, the globe as one massive Jonestown?
So far it seems this is what the majority wants. If they don’t really want this consummation of universal death in spirit, emotion and body, they’d better snap out of their terror-induced mental delirium fast, before it’s too late.
Reference: Off-guardian.org


humansarefree--2020-07-31--Ghislaine Maxwell Documents Unsealed: Bill Clinton Was on ‘Pedo Island’ with Jeffrey Epstein, Maxwel

Ghislaine Maxwell Documents Unsealed: Bill Clinton Was on ‘Pedo Island’ with Jeffrey Epstein, Maxwell and ‘2 Young Girls’

Ghislaine Maxwell ’ s lawyers tried to keep x-rated evidence related to pedophile Jeffrey Epstein from going public , but a judge denied the appeal and released damning docs on Thursday evening .
Epstein ’ s pimp , Ghislaine Maxwell is currently in federal custody awaiting trial .
A witness interview revealed Bill Clinton was at Epstein ’ s pedophile island with Jeffrey Epstein , Ghislaine Maxwell and “ 2 young girls.
” Portion of the interview with a witness : “ When you say you asked him why is Bill Clinton here , where was here ?
” JS @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Epstein and Bill Clinton on the island , who else was there ?
” V : Ghislaine , Emmy , and there were 2 young girls that I could identify .
I never really knew them well anyways .
It was just 2 girls from New York.
” JS : And were all of you staying at Jeffrey ’ s house on the island including Bill Clinton ?
” V : That ’ s correct .
He had about 4 or 5 different villas on his island separate from the main house , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” JS : “ Were sexual orgies a regular occurrence on the island at Jeffrey ’ s house ?
” We reported in 2016 before the election that Bill Clinton took numerous trips on Epstein ’ s ‘ Lolita Express ’ to Epstein ’ s private “ Orgy Island ” where underage girls as young as 14 were prostituted for Epstein ’ s rich and famous clients like Clinton , Kevin Spacey and Prince Andrew .
Also read : Why Did Hillary Clinton Visit Jeffrey Epstein ’ s Pedophilia Island 6 Times Via @ @ @ @ @ @ @ claim that his Secret Service were with him during every trip is bogus because according to reports he simply ditched his security detail in order to stealth travel with Epstein .
In May 2016 FOX News reported that Bill Clinton traveled with Jeffrey Epstein on his famous “ Lolita Express ” at least 26 times and frequently ditched his secret service detail .

Ghislaine Maxwell’s lawyers tried to keep x-rated evidence related to pedophile Jeffrey Epstein from going public, but a judge denied the appeal and released damning docs on Thursday evening.
by Cristina Laila
Epstein’s pimp, Ghislaine Maxwell is currently in federal custody awaiting trial.
A witness interview revealed Bill Clinton was at Epstein’s pedophile island with Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and “2 young girls.”
Portion of the interview with a witness:
“When you say you asked him why is Bill Clinton here, where was here?”
V: On the island
JS: When you were present with Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton on the island, who else was there?”
V: Ghislaine, Emmy, and there were 2 young girls that I could identify. I never really knew them well anyways. It was just 2 girls from New York.”
JS: And were all of you staying at Jeffrey’s house on the island including Bill Clinton?”
V: That’s correct. He had about 4 or 5 different villas on his island separate from the main house, and we all stayed in the villas.”
JS: “Were sexual orgies a regular occurrence on the island at Jeffrey’s house?”
V: “Yes”
Witness interview: Bill Clinton was at Epstein's island with Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and "2 young girls." pic.twitter.com/NG8PbaZLNt — Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) July 31, 2020
We reported in 2016 before the election that Bill Clinton took numerous trips on Epstein’s ‘Lolita Express’ to Epstein’s private “Orgy Island” where underage girls as young as 14 were prostituted for Epstein’s rich and famous clients like Clinton, Kevin Spacey and Prince Andrew.
Also read: Why Did Hillary Clinton Visit Jeffrey Epstein’s Pedophilia Island 6 Times Via The Lolita Express?
Clinton’s claim that his Secret Service were with him during every trip is bogus because according to reports he simply ditched his security detail in order to stealth travel with Epstein.
In May 2016 FOX News reported that Bill Clinton traveled with Jeffrey Epstein on his famous “Lolita Express” at least 26 times and frequently ditched his secret service detail.


humansarefree--2020-08-01--UN Officials Cite Study That Finds Lockdowns, School Closures KILLING More Children Than COVID

UN officials have pointed to a study that reveals lockdowns and school closures are doing more harm to children than the coronavirus itself , with many more deaths expected to come from the reaction to the outbreak , rather than the pandemic itself .
In a presentation seeking extra funding for coronavirus efforts , UNICEF director Henrietta H Fore said Monday , “ The repercussions of the pandemic are causing more harm to children than the disease itself.
” UNICEF nutrition program chief Victor Aguayo noted that the most harm is being done “ by having schools closed , by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by having nutritional programs dysfunctional.
” The officials pointed to a study published in The Lancet that notes “ physical distancing , school closures , trade restrictions , and country lockdowns ” are worsening global child malnutrition .
The study estimates that an extra 6.7 million children will be at risk , and that lockdowns and other coronavirus responses could lead to more than 10,000 additional child deaths every month .
The UNICEF officials noted that would mean 128,000 more deaths among children within the next year .
The study complies research from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( IFPRI ) and the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health .
It concludes that shut down strategies could lead to “ life-long impacts on education , chronic disease risks , and overall human capital formation , ” in addition to “ intergenerational consequences for child growth and development.
” The estimates are said to “ likely to be conservative , given that the duration of this crisis is unknown , and its full impacts on food , health , and social protection systems are yet to be realized.
” The study @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lockdowns will conservatively “ destroy at least seven times more years of human life ” than they save .
The German government has concluded that the impact of the country ’ s lockdown could end up killing more people than the coronavirus due to victims of other serious illnesses not receiving treatment .
As we have previously highlighted , in the UK there have already been up to 10,000 excess deaths as a result of seriously ill people avoiding hospitals due to COVID-19 or not having their hospital treatments cancelled .
A data @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the economic consequences of the country ’ s lockdown will lead to 29 times more people dying than the coronavirus itself .
Hundreds of doctors are also on record as opposing lockdown measures , warning that they will cause more death than the coronavirus itself .
While globalists have urged that lockdowns need to continue , medical and economic experts across the board in multiple countries are warning that the loss of life will be much greater than that caused directly by the virus itself , if lockdowns are not scrapped .

UN officials have pointed to a study that reveals lockdowns and school closures are doing more harm to children than the coronavirus itself, with many more deaths expected to come from the reaction to the outbreak, rather than the pandemic itself.
by Steve Watson
In a presentation seeking extra funding for coronavirus efforts, UNICEF director Henrietta H Fore said Monday, “The repercussions of the pandemic are causing more harm to children than the disease itself.”
UNICEF nutrition program chief Victor Aguayo noted that the most harm is being done “by having schools closed, by having primary health care services disrupted, by having nutritional programs dysfunctional.”
The officials pointed to a study published in The Lancet that notes “physical distancing, school closures, trade restrictions, and country lockdowns” are worsening global child malnutrition.
The study estimates that an extra 6.7 million children will be at risk, and that lockdowns and other coronavirus responses could lead to more than 10,000 additional child deaths every month.
The UNICEF officials noted that would mean 128,000 more deaths among children within the next year.
Study: Global Lockdowns Killing 10,000 Children Per Monthhttps://t.co/GG9DWHZpeY — Dan Bongino (@dbongino) July 28, 2020
The study complies research from the Washington-based International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
It concludes that shut down strategies could lead to “life-long impacts on education, chronic disease risks, and overall human capital formation,” in addition to “intergenerational consequences for child growth and development.”
The estimates are said to “likely to be conservative, given that the duration of this crisis is unknown, and its full impacts on food, health, and social protection systems are yet to be realized.”
The study dovetails with other research that has concluded lockdowns will conservatively “destroy at least seven times more years of human life” than they save.
The German government has concluded that the impact of the country’s lockdown could end up killing more people than the coronavirus due to victims of other serious illnesses not receiving treatment.
As we have previously highlighted, in the UK there have already been up to 10,000 excess deaths as a result of seriously ill people avoiding hospitals due to COVID-19 or not having their hospital treatments cancelled.
A data analyst consortium in South Africa also found that the economic consequences of the country’s lockdown will lead to 29 times more people dying than the coronavirus itself.
Hundreds of doctors are also on record as opposing lockdown measures, warning that they will cause more death than the coronavirus itself.
While globalists have urged that lockdowns need to continue, medical and economic experts across the board in multiple countries are warning that the loss of life will be much greater than that caused directly by the virus itself, if lockdowns are not scrapped.


humansarefree--2020-08-01--Big Pharma and All Its Whores Around the World

“ We are talking about private contracts outside the scope of government .
We ’ re talking about local barter , and the issuing of local currencies , the building of private money systems .
“ During the Great Depression , many citizens looked around and said , ‘ We still have land and food , we still have commodities .
Nothing has changed here .
We just have to invent a way to conduct commerce among ourselves.
’ “ One estimate states that , during the Depression of the 1930s , there were 1500 private money systems across America.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Underground ” ) I have made my case concerning the fake pandemic .
Many times now .
From the beginning — the failure to isolate , purify , or actually discover a novel coronavirus by correct procedures .
The meaningless diagnostic tests and the meaningless case numbers .
The propaganda .
The use of “ the virus ” as a cover story obscuring high-level corporate and government crimes .
Of course , many people believe in the COVID-19 virus .
And of these , some have been seeking treatments outside the bounds of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
They are exercising freedom in managing their own health .
And so some of them are taking hydroxychloroquine ( HCQ ) .
The FDA , which certifies all medical drugs as safe and effective , before they are released for public use , has not recommended HCQ for COVID treatment .
It has banned the drug for that purpose , outside of hospitals and clinical trials .
The FDA ‘ s track record — which I ’ ve been documenting for the past 25 years — is a horror show .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was authored in 2000 , by Dr. Barbara Starfield , and published on July 26th of that year , in the Journal of the American Medical Association .
Starfield stated that , annually , FDA-approved medicines kill 106,000 Americans .
That ’ s over a million Americans per decade .
So relying on the FDA to decide whether HCQ is a useful drug is not a concession some Americans are willing to make .
Pharma and all its allies and minions and whores are focusing on a jackpot bonanza for COVID treatment : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ does not want competition .
It definitely does not want to see a landscape in which all sorts of alternative treatments for COVID ( or any purported disease ) are rampant and free-wheeling .
We are seeing multiple censorship actions across platforms , when people , including doctors , speak positively about HCQ .
Fauci is very much in the pro-Pharma camp , of course .
He and Gates want an RNA vaccine to come to market , by any means necessary .
They also want antiviral drugs to dominate COVID treatment .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pharma-anticipated future for these new ( toxic ) antiviral medicines .
And not just for COVID .
Up to now , there has been very little mainstream progress in getting drugs specifically designed to treat viruses into the marketplace .
This is Pharma ’ s big opportunity .
They envision a trillion-dollar operation that will elevate antivirals ( for treating any viruses ) to the level of , say , antibiotics , which are used against bacteria .
COVID would simply be the first major “ breakthrough.
” So we have a war @ @ @ @ @ @ @ modalities vs. vaccines and antivirals .
Pharma does not want to lose this one .
It would be disastrous .
I am not touting HCQ .
I am putting it this way : if many people are convinced , or become convinced , that HCQ is a drug of choice , and if they believe it is helping them , then a major rebellion against Pharma and the FDA and its counterparts around the world takes off .
It soars .
And it spurs the use of other alternatives on which Pharma makes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ alternative medicine have been booming since the 1980s .
A new escalation would send very serious shock waves through the pharmaceutical industry .
Fauci is well aware of this .
He is fronting for the industry in every possible way .
Trump , with his statements favoring HCQ , has become a major threat in that regard .
When you see new reports of soaring COVID case numbers — a con which I ’ ve documented six ways from Sunday — you ’ re not only witnessing a planned strategy to maintain the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ billions of people whose lives are at stake ; you ’ re also watching a justification for pushing antivirals and vaccines .
For the benefit of Pharma .
The last thing the pharmaceutical industry wants to see is their own case-number con giving birth to wildcat outbreaks of health freedom .
People leaving the nest .
People going elsewhere for treatment .
Individuals making decisions about their own treatments — this is very serious business .
People should look deeply before making choices .
In the case of various HCQ protocols , they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the course of illness the drug would be given ( early or late ) ; whether there is illness requiring treatment to begin with ; whether people may have a heredity condition which could make HCQ perilous or even lethal—these are some of the relevant considerations .
The FDA and Pharma want to be the first and last word .
Life and Liberty say they are not the first and last word .
In that regard , there is another issue : licenses vs. contracts .
The medical cartel , backed by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ grant licenses to practice medicine .
These special persons , doctors , are handed the right to treat and cure diseases .
This is an attempt to create a monopoly .
There is another avenue : private contracts .
Here is the analogy I ’ ve used to describe this situation .
Two adults , Joe and Fred , enter into an agreement .
Joe says he has a health condition .
He will be the patient .
Fred will be the practitioner .
Fred has a well on his property .
Fred @ @ @ @ @ @ @ quality .
He will give some of it ( or sell it ) to Joe , who will drink it over the course of two weeks .
Both men , in their contract , agree that no legal liability will be attached to the outcome .
They are both responsible .
They are of sound mind .
They don ’ t require government permission to sign or fulfill their contract .
Joe and Fred are operating on their own .
They have that natural right .
They also have the right to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t work , or is harmful .
Of course , all sorts of meddlers will claim this arrangement is illegal and absurd .
Meddlers always try to curb freedom .
That ’ s their crusade in life .
They can ’ t stand the idea of people making their own choices and decisions and then accepting the consequences .
I ’ m not saying governments will honor such contracts .
Governments are prime meddlers .
I ’ m saying these contracts ( and not just in the arena of healing ) stand outside @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are prior to government .
They are intrinsically more real than government .
THIS is what COMMUNITY actually means .

“We are talking about private contracts outside the scope of government. We’re talking about local barter, and the issuing of local currencies, the building of private money systems.
“During the Great Depression, many citizens looked around and said, ‘We still have land and food, we still have commodities. Nothing has changed here. We just have to invent a way to conduct commerce among ourselves.’
“One estimate states that, during the Depression of the 1930s, there were 1500 private money systems across America.” (My notes for “The Underground”)
I have made my case concerning the fake pandemic. Many times now.
From the beginning — the failure to isolate, purify, or actually discover a novel coronavirus by correct procedures.
The meaningless diagnostic tests and the meaningless case numbers. The propaganda. The use of “the virus” as a cover story obscuring high-level corporate and government crimes.
Of course, many people believe in the COVID-19 virus. And of these, some have been seeking treatments outside the bounds of government certification.
This is their right. They are exercising freedom in managing their own health. And so some of them are taking hydroxychloroquine (HCQ).
The FDA, which certifies all medical drugs as safe and effective, before they are released for public use, has not recommended HCQ for COVID treatment. It has banned the drug for that purpose, outside of hospitals and clinical trials.
The FDA‘s track record — which I’ve been documenting for the past 25 years — is a horror show.
The first key review I became aware of was authored in 2000, by Dr. Barbara Starfield, and published on July 26th of that year, in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Starfield stated that, annually, FDA-approved medicines kill 106,000 Americans. That’s over a million Americans per decade.
So relying on the FDA to decide whether HCQ is a useful drug is not a concession some Americans are willing to make.
Pharma and all its allies and minions and whores are focusing on a jackpot bonanza for COVID treatment: jjabs and new antiviral drugs. Pharma does not want competition.
It definitely does not want to see a landscape in which all sorts of alternative treatments for COVID (or any purported disease) are rampant and free-wheeling.
We are seeing multiple censorship actions across platforms, when people, including doctors, speak positively about HCQ.
Fauci is very much in the pro-Pharma camp, of course. He and Gates want an RNA jjab to come to market, by any means necessary. They also want antiviral drugs to dominate COVID treatment.
A very sharp reader spelled out the Pharma-anticipated future for these new (toxic) antiviral medicines. And not just for COVID.
Up to now, there has been very little mainstream progress in getting drugs specifically designed to treat viruses into the marketplace. This is Pharma’s big opportunity.
They envision a trillion-dollar operation that will elevate antivirals (for treating any viruses) to the level of, say, antibiotics, which are used against bacteria. COVID would simply be the first major “breakthrough.”
So we have a war going on. HCQ and other alternative modalities vs. jjabs and antivirals. Pharma does not want to lose this one. It would be disastrous.
I am not touting HCQ. I am putting it this way: if many people are convinced, or become convinced, that HCQ is a drug of choice, and if they believe it is helping them, then a major rebellion against Pharma and the FDA and its counterparts around the world takes off. It soars. And it spurs the use of other alternatives on which Pharma makes zero profits.
So-called natural health and alternative medicine have been booming since the 1980s. A new escalation would send very serious shock waves through the pharmaceutical industry.
Fauci is well aware of this. He is fronting for the industry in every possible way. Trump, with his statements favoring HCQ, has become a major threat in that regard.
When you see new reports of soaring COVID case numbers — a con which I’ve documented six ways from Sunday — you’re not only witnessing a planned strategy to maintain the war against the economy and therefore against billions of people whose lives are at stake; you’re also watching a justification for pushing antivirals and jjabs. For the benefit of Pharma.
The last thing the pharmaceutical industry wants to see is their own case-number con giving birth to wildcat outbreaks of health freedom. People leaving the nest. People going elsewhere for treatment.
Individuals making decisions about their own treatments — this is very serious business. People should look deeply before making choices.
In the case of various HCQ protocols, they should consider: dosage levels; when in the course of illness the drug would be given (early or late); whether there is illness requiring treatment to begin with; whether people may have a heredity condition which could make HCQ perilous or even lethal—these are some of the relevant considerations.
The FDA and Pharma want to be the first and last word.
Life and Liberty say they are not the first and last word.
In that regard, there is another issue: licenses vs. contracts. The medical cartel, backed by governments, has established medical boards which grant licenses to practice medicine.
These special persons, doctors, are handed the right to treat and cure diseases. This is an attempt to create a monopoly.
There is another avenue: private contracts. Here is the analogy I’ve used to describe this situation. Two adults, Joe and Fred, enter into an agreement. Joe says he has a health condition. He will be the patient.
Fred will be the practitioner. Fred has a well on his property. Fred believes the water has a special healing quality. He will give some of it (or sell it) to Joe, who will drink it over the course of two weeks.
Both men, in their contract, agree that no legal liability will be attached to the outcome. They are both responsible. They are of sound mind. They don’t require government permission to sign or fulfill their contract.
That’s it in a nutshell.
Joe and Fred are operating on their own. They have that natural right. They also have the right to be wrong—in case the water treatment doesn’t work, or is harmful.
Of course, all sorts of meddlers will claim this arrangement is illegal and absurd. Meddlers always try to curb freedom.
That’s their crusade in life. They can’t stand the idea of people making their own choices and decisions and then accepting the consequences.
I’m not saying governments will honor such contracts. Governments are prime meddlers. I’m saying these contracts (and not just in the arena of healing) stand outside governments. They are citizen-to-citizen. They are prior to government. They are intrinsically more real than government.
THIS is what COMMUNITY actually means.
By Jon Rappoport, Guest writer


humansarefree--2020-08-01--America is Led by Mass Murderers – What Can Citizens Do?

There is overwhelming evidence that Dr. Anthony Fauci , the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases since 1984 , is guilty of mass murder .
Earning huge profits from the pharmaceutical industry , he has been the main leader in the United States controlling the Coronavirus response , which has included squelching public information about hydroxychloroquine , a safe FDA-approved drug which has been in the market for decades , and which thousands of doctors are now saying has a 100 % cure rate for patients diagnosed with COVID-19 .
This action alone has led to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as well as billions of taxpayer dollars spent on “ new ” cures for COVID-19 , such as the very profitable Remdesivir , and the upcoming COVID vaccines .
He seems to wield more power and influence than even the President of the United States .
So is there no way to stop him or bring him to justice ?
What Dr. Fauci and others like him who are complicit in mass murder has is unlimited financial resources , as he is part of the Wall Street Central Bankers who pretty much control @ @ @ @ @ @ @ organizations such as the World Health Organization , the World Economic Forum , the Council on Foreign Relations , and many other organizations that are linked to Central Bankers .
What allows this small group of Billionaires to control the affairs of the world and get away with mass murder is not their wealth , however , but a compliant and non-resistant citizenry .
An uprising among the “ common folk ” is what they fear most , because the “ common folk ” outnumber them significantly , and it would not even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ folk ” to overthrow their power .
They use subtle mind-control techniques to control narratives , and they also use the media , and especially today in the 21st Century , they use Big Tech to squelch freedom of thought and expression .
They keep the masses fighting each other instead of them , by creating political and social divisions that the masses in large part do not even understand originate from this small group of wealthy people .
And when you get to the top of the power structure of these people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ very nice people at all .
They are very evil .
They are Satanists who are involved in the Occult and they are pedophiles and murderers .
What Can Citizens Do ?
The political system in the U.S. is thoroughly corrupt .
Our Constitutional principles , originally drafted and implemented to protect citizens against the over-reach of a tyrannical government , pretty much died in 1913 when the Federal Reserve Bank was setup to control the monetary system .
Bankers and Wall Street have pretty much ruled the nation ever since then .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and the Supreme Court .
Here are a couple of suggestions I have today , here in July of 2020 , of how citizens could potentially take back the country away from the powerful bankers and Wall Street .
One of the provisions of the Constitution that is supposed to give the citizens of the United States access to justice , apart from the three branches of the government , is the Grand Jury .
Larry Klayman , founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch , has been one of the main @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recent years .
He has a website here devoted to the topic .
Writing for Newsmax.com in 2018 , he explained : There is only one way that the nation will restore itself to equal justice under the law , as it was designed on July 4 , 1776 , in my birthplace of Philadelphia .
In this regard , We the People must now take a page from the “ Old West , ” before there was any U.S. Department of Justice , and implement citizens ’ grand juries , citizens ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In this regard , our venerable and regrettably now deceased Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia ruled in the landmark case of United States v. Williams , 112 S. Ct. 1735 , 504 U.S. 36 , 118 L. Ed .
2d 352 ( 1992 ) , that the grand jury under our Constitution does not belong to any of the three branches of government , but instead to We the People .
As a result , the citizenry are empowered to empanel grand juries , indict , try , convict and mete out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He goes on to explain how he previously put this law to practice in Ocala , Florida : A few years ago , I , as the prosecutor and a Florida lawyer , empaneled a citizens ’ grand jury in Ocala , Florida , …picked the jurors randomly from voter rolls as is done by federal and state courts , and advised the accused , in this case Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama of the proceeding and offered to allow them to testify , and then presented evidence to the citizens grand jury @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a result they were indicted for alleged crimes concerning their manifest harm to national security over Iran which not coincidentally involved leaking classified information about our cyber-attack on Iranian nuclear reactors .
This classified information was illegally leaked to bolster Obama ’ s and Clinton ’ s political fortunes .
A trial then ensued , presided over by a neutral judge picked from the Ocala community , and Clinton and Obama were convicted of crimes .
At the time , we did not seek to enforce the convictions .
( Source ) I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ politicians is the best route to go in using a citizen grand jury , however , when it is Wall Street Bankers who are mostly responsible for these crimes against the American people .
I would prefer citizen grand juries to be non-partisan politically .
And instead of trying politicians , let ’ s try Wall Street executives who always buy their freedom and avoid justice .
Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates would be two good examples to start with .
Also , if this method were to be employed today against those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ convictions would be necessary as well .
This would probably involve a Civil War , as most of the armament in the U.S. is controlled by the Government , and there would need to be enough defectors to participate in Civil Disobedience .
But I believe there are enough good people in the military and in law enforcement who could make a difference if they defected .
But for those who are not spoon-fed the propaganda from the corporate media with the dissenting voices being squelched by Big Tech , it is obvious @ @ @ @ @ @ @ War .
Some people are just confused about the “ sides.
” It is not a war between liberals and conservatives , or the Left versus the Right , or white versus black , but the average citizens against the Wall Street Bankers .
Anthony Fauci , for example , whom I believe should be one of the first persons tried by a citizen grand jury since he is on the public payroll , has served both Republican and Democratic politicians .
Massive Civil Disobedience – A Call for Big Tech Employees to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the billionaires on Wall Street , most of whom are part of the pharmaceutical industry , to order Americans to stay home so that they can destroy the economy and transfer TRILLIONS to themselves .
It is well established now that the lock downs have caused more illness and deaths than “ the virus.
” But what if the tables were turned ?
Everything the tyrants use to achieve their goals is dependent upon others to fall in line .
The Big Tech executives , for example , just appeared before Congress yesterday @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
Probably nothing .
After all , the members of Congress for the most part work for these Wall Street Billionaires !
We have seen the effects of how just a few dissenters and whistleblowers can have a massive influence on the public .
We saw it this week with the Frontline Doctors who came to Washington D.C. and held press conferences and seminars to expose the truth .
Censorship for the most part did not work , because enough people were dedicated to keeping their message alive and distributing it to as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are being attacked by the Globalists now , just as they have done to every other whistleblower who has come forward to share the truth .
Dr. Judy Mikovits is another example of someone who has put everything on the line to share the truth , as are Julian Assange and Edward Snowden in recent years , who are treated as criminals instead of whistleblowers who brought the truth about corruption to the masses .
The Big Tech companies have a huge number of employees , and if you work for Facebook , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ complicit with the crimes committed by your employer .
If any of you want to come forward as anonymous whistleblowers , you are welcome to contact Health Impact News .
And if enough employees decide they are not going to participate in these crimes any longer , they have the power to cripple the operations of these evil companies , if they value freedom , the truth , and human life more than they value their paycheck , and devise a plan to work together from the inside .
I am not claiming @ @ @ @ @ @ @ correct path to take , but it is time to start thinking and discussing these kinds of things .
If you are still holding out hope that a politician or the political process can somehow turn all this around , you are not living in reality any more .
The war is between the masses and the Global Wall Street bankers , and we have no chance of success if we continue to fight among ourselves , not truly recognizing who the real enemy is .
We need to set aside our political @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a common cause of liberty , truth , and the value of human life .
We must not succumb to fear , but press on in faith that good will triumph over evil , that God will triumph over the Devil .
Because if we fail , murderers will continue to run this country , and we have not seen the worst yet .

In a poll of 68 countries, the United States has far outpaced all other pretenders to the terrorist throne, being crowned the most evil country on earth in a landslide.
No other country came even close in the global threat and tyranny race, with the US garnering 24% of the total votes, with Pakistan a distant second at 8% and China seriously fading with an embarrassing 6% showing.
Hardly worth mentioning were the also rans Afghanistan, Israel, Iran and North Korea who could only muster 5% a piece. So as not to skew the results, the poll was given to America’s NATO-allied partners and many forcibly occupied nations alike. In fact, 13% of its own citizens agreed with the dangers posed by the US government on themselves and the rest of the world as well.
Talk about dominating in the worst ways coming home to roost! And for those who pay attention to world events, it becomes easy to see why the US is so feared and hated now internationally, in no small part to its dollar’s strategic position as the world’s reserve currency of force.
This has allowed the US to label itself the righteous global super-cop from the west, ever vigilant and ready to spread its brand of democratic hegemony onto the world in the name of protecting freedoms. Sounds suspiciously like the mafia’s racket of old – “Pay up for protection or else we can’t protect you… from us!”
The US spell cast since WWII upon small, vulnerable nations to surrender liberties in exchange for the very American ideas of “freedom,” has broken under the weight of millions upon millions of rotting corpses, destroyed economies and corporate-political takeovers through countless multi-generational shock and awe invasion campaigns.
The rest of the world has experienced for many decades what Americans are only now beginning to awaken to: the US government has sought all along to fashion itself after the Romans, seeking to cement the American Empire as the undisputed ruler around the globe.
This is the very reason the Federal Reserve, along with its crony partners at the IMF, unleashed the deadly virus called the US dollar to encircle the globe, infecting and zombifying all that it touches, before eventually killing everything.
Students of real history know this is the exact same tactic the US used to commit genocide against the native Americans during the 1700’s by giving them small pox-laced blankets. Some things never change, only this time they’ve set their sights on the entire globe.
Yet, what happens once there are no longer any more viable foreign nations to destroy? Like any viral plague, it adapts by turning inward and starts to feed on the host, or rather its citizens, instead.
Since September 11, 2001, this insidious cancer has been raging uncontrollably throughout the United States.
The US Patriot Act, a virtual carbon copy of Adolf Hitler’s Reichstag Decree, was injected into the veins of the country to begin destroying its peoples’ liberties as a means to combat and root out terrorists, whoever or whatever they may be.
In truth, it was set up to be nothing more than a convenient excuse for the burning of the Constitution, with an Orwellian dictatorship rising from its ashes.
This was followed by the shadowy Department of Homeland Security, again a virtual copy of the jack-booted Nazi SS thugs of old. Headed up by the wicked Janet Napolitano, her refrain has been to spread fear among the population with her “see something, say something” paranoia campaign to rat out your friends and neighbors.
From there, the TSA was created to arbitrarily treat everyone like a would-be terror suspect by herding nervous airline travelers into deadly naked scanner capsules, molesting them with invasive pat-downs and cavity searches under the ruse of finding weapons of mass destruction.
To this day, these outrageous and obviously unconstitutional intimidation tactics have not resulted in a single terrorist arrest, but then again, they were never meant to.
The real agenda was to train the population into accepting this type of abuse as normal. With repeated assaults, even the most stubborn dog will eventually cower in fear at the mere sight of a raised fist so the abuser no longer has to go to the trouble of beating it down to gain its full compliance.
At that point, anything goes and the masses are programmed to believe that as long as they keep their heads down, their mouths shut and grovel about inconspicuously, they will not attract the attention of their abuser.
By taking this Pollyannic view, they feel they will be safe. Oh, but how terribly wrong they are. When a disease takes root there are two choices: do nothing and pretend it doesn’t exist, which leads to death – or keep it from spreading by taking steps to eliminate the threat it poses.
And right now that cancerous growth is metastasizing and growing out of control. Along with the additions made to the already tyrannical Patriot Act, the NDAA was recently re-approved indefinitely, with CISPA and FISA right on its heels to eliminate the rest of their quickly diminishing privacy rights.
These abominations have given the NSA full reign to unleash their spybots globally, surveiling foreign allies and foes alike by indiscriminately hacking into their private email and phone conversations in the name of national security. So, it’s certainly no mystery why the world collectively views the United States as the greatest threat to world peace.
Domestically, this has resulted in drones policing the skies, Obama’s domestic kill list of citizens he considers a threat to his regime, the militarization of state and local police, along with smart meters, cell phones, laptops, big screen televisions and appliances embedded with NSA spyware to surveil everyone in and outside of their homes 24 hours a day. If this is where we are now, the logical question to ask is where is it all leading to?
Well, history has always served as a reliable gauge in that respect, yet most government-approved historical experts conveniently ignore it, or rather wish we would. And for good reason since a population of citizens ignorant of the past are much easier to manipulate and control.
What we do know is all empires eventually fall to so much pixie dust and there are tell-tale signs that scream out when the end is near, yet very few ever hear it.
But guess what, that clarion call has become an earth-shattering roar now – can you hear it? We are currently living through the decline of western civilization as we know it and here are a few glaring signs that have repeated without fail over the centuries to usher in its collapse and fall:
1. EXPANSION – Empiric hubris gets to the point where it seeks to expand its influence throughout the world via increasingly expensive rape and pillage wars with just about every neighbor with natural resources to be stolen.
This drains the empire’s own economy of vital resources needed to effectively run it, leading to poverty of its own citizens through increasingly onerous taxation and finally a massive revolt against the bankrupt empire.
2. POLICE STATE – This is what the above mentioned Patriot Act, NDAA, TSA, DHS, NSA and FEMA are all about. It’s the point when the empire’s foundation begins to crack and splinter in earnest, leading to the clampdown of its citizens in a desperate attempt to forestall the inevitable collapse.
Massive riots and devastating false flags occur throughout the nation as martial law is declared. This is the most dangerous time for the citizenry because the militarized government will begin rounding up everyone it suspects might be a threat and detaining them indefinitely in FEMA prison camps.
3. MASSIVE FIAT MONEY PRINTING – To continue fueling a parasitic military war machine, an empire ends up draining its coffers of the real wealth that allowed it to become an empire in the first place – gold and silver!
A clear signal that an empire has overextended itself is when it outlaws or discourages its citizens from owning any of the precious metals themselves.
Facing default in 1971, President Nixon closed the gold window, allowing the FED to print massive amounts of US debt notes, aka the US dollar, backed by absolutely nothing but faith!
Despite what the FED will have us believe, completely unbacked fiat money-printing has always led to hyper-inflation and the financial collapse of every empire that tried it and the United States is spiraling down that black-hole of insolvency at dizzying speeds.
4. DECADENCE – Right at the tipping point, basic morals-ethics give way to an anything goes all-you-can-eat orgy of food, sex, greed, violence, narcissism and gluttony as psychopathic behavior becomes the accepted societal norm.
Since decadence is the trigger that sends everything crashing down, let’s take a deeper look into this one, shall we?
a. In a decadent society, food becomes so plentiful that more of it ends up being thrown away than is eaten, even as the waistlines of the zombified citizen pigs become sickeningly expansive. To feed the zombified horde, GMO foods are engineered to produce artificially giant yields while being devoid of any substantive nutrition.
Through this, we can see how genetically modified crops and livestock are employed as weapons of health destruction to keep the population sick and slovenly so they pose no real threat to the empire.
Further, chefs become worshiped by an adoring public who stay glued to the endless monotony of food-based unreality television shows that simply encourage them to mindlessly consume even more.
b. We’ve seen a strong push by the government to push sex education to kindergarten-aged children. This new in your face education further teaches highly impressionable children about the merits of the gay, lesbian and transgender lifestyles, while also giving children condoms just in case they get the urge to experiment on one another.
I’m all for everyone being free to choose their sexual orientation, but forcing this on children using taxpayer dollars is insanely despicable. Yet, it’s clearly obvious why its happening now.
Over the past decade, a powerful pedophile lobby has been gaining influence in the upper echelons of Congress and institutional psychiatry, pounding the table to decriminalize rape against children by adults as long as the child gives consent.
In fact, the American Psychiatry Association recently listed pedophilia in the latest Diagnostic & Statistical Manual of Disorders (DSM-5) as a “sexual orientation” no different than being gay, straight or transgender.
The whole point is to bring pedophilia into the mainstream as just another sexual choice an adult can make to rape a child without fear of imprisonment or societal shame.
Sickeningly, the sham research concluded that sexual abuse of children was found to show no long-term ill effects. Quite to the contrary, they claim it instead creates a stronger, more healthy and loving bond between child and rapist.
It was only after recently being vilified by conservative family groups, that the APA back-pedaled and made some revisions to their designation of what constitutes aberrant pedophilic behaviors and what does not.
Even more sickening, pedophile rights groups such as the notorious child molester rights organization, NAMBLA, worked with House Judiciary Democrats to have pedophiles included as a protected minority, along with gays and lesbians in the hate crimes, hate speech and anti-bullying bills.
These laws shockingly give pedophiles special rights and privileges above the rights of all other citizens. In practice, if a parent discovers a pedophile raping their child and physically pulls the pedophile from the child, the parent could be charged with a “bias-motivated assault,” a federal hate crime and go to prison!
But, don’t think for a minute that this twisted pedophilic goal to bring child rapists out of the closet of despicable shame and into mainstream acceptance is going to end anytime soon.
After all, Washington D.C. has been notorious for being one of the elite pedophilia capitals of the world and they always protect their own. Let’s not forget how quickly the investigation into the child porn ring that included over 5,200 Pentagon employees and high ranking officials was halted with the weak excuse that arresting the deviants would harm national security.
c. A casual glance at recent Hollywood TV series and movies shows a very disturbing and ongoing trend. The traditional, tight-knit family structure has been replaced by broken homes, soulless, narcissistic, drug dependent and sexually deviant characters who engage in all manner of psychopathic criminal behavior to get what they want.
Perhaps, the greatest recent example of the unbridled celebration, glorification and normalization of outlandishly despicable and criminal behavior is represented in Martin Scorsese’s “The Wolf of Wall Street.”
In it, Leonardo DiCaprio portrays a psychopathic degenerate who lies, cheats and steals from everyone he meets along his stratospheric rise to the top of the criminal Wall Street empire.
Rather than being any sort of cautionary tale about greed or decadent behavior run amuck, he is portrayed as a loveable, ambitious guy who led a fun and exciting life with his posse of equally loveable frat-like buddies, who ended up getting wronged by government investigators out to unfairly take him down.
However, no mention was ever made of the countless lives his unbridled criminality destroyed, since that would’ve made the psychopathic lifestyle much less fun for viewers to worship – or want to emulate for that matter.
So the moral of the story, if any, is it’s good to do anything it takes to steal other people’s money since that’s the American dream – just don’t get caught! Predictably, the sociopaths of Wall Street have embraced this film as their own to further encourage and justify their criminal culture. Decadence indeed!
Within the walls of the great American Empire, it does appear to be in the final death throes of the “bread, wine and circuses” phase of decadent collapse. Yet, all is not lost for those with the eyes to see what is plainly occurring and the will to take decisive actions to counter it.
As always, I offer a few suggestions I believe will benefit those willing to disconnect from the tentacles of the parasitic beast and take back full responsibility for their own lives and destiny during the very challenging transitions we may be facing very shortly.
In any event, it’s always better to be prepared ahead of time. It’s the same reason we buy insurance, right?
1. Plant your own veggie-fruit garden, store food, firearms for self defense, ammo, batteries and plenty of drinking water. During a collapse, those are the first items that get stripped from store shelves and are vital for everyday survival. On top of that, growing your own food is much better for your health and saves a ton of money.
2. Trade dollars for silver or gold. As history shows, when fiat currencies collapse, the value of the monetary metals skyrocket in value. Right now, silver is perhaps the most undervalued and ignored commodity on earth, despite being the most important for industrial and financial purposes.
It is no longer being mined enough to meet global industrial consumption and geological surveys report it may become extinct within ten years. Simple supply-demand mechanics clearly show that the price per silver ounce, currently around $20, will easily climb into the mid to high $100s over the next few years.
3. It may also be wise to open a BitCoin account and trade some dollars for those. When the Cyprus banks collapsed, depositors could not get any access to their money for days and weeks. This caused a mad rush into the relative safety of the crypto currency, which exists outside of the centralized banking control paradigm.
As more of the mainstream global population begin to flee their respective fiat currencies and move into bitcoin, prices will naturally soar due to its relative scarcity in comparison to the unlimited amounts of fake money governments print with impunity.
One of the easiest ways to buy bitcoins is through Coinbase, which allows customers to easily link any bank or credit union account to their personal Coinbase account to buy them.
4. Hold enough cash outside of your banks to get you through at least a month. When the system finally collapses, anything you have on deposit will be gone with it and ATM-credit cards will be useless.
Besides, by doing business with the criminal likes of BofA, Chase, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, we are aiding and abetting their criminality. Disconnect from the banking parasites and watch them die!
5. Stay healthy of mind and body by avoiding all jjabs, pharma drugs, antibiotics, junk foods, sodas, gmo’s, etc. Instead, choose natural and organic foods and a lifestyle conducive to an abundant state of being.
By starting down this road, you can also avoid the tyranny of the terminal cancer known as Obamacare! Until next time be well and stay well, my friends.
By Hanzei E., Lost in the Bamboo Forest;