humansarefree--2020-06-17--COVID-19 Lockdowns Are Neither Necessary, Nor Scientific, Nor Helpful

… A lockdown is one form of mandatory restriction of freedom of action .
Restrictions in the US have included bans on serving customers in restaurants and other places of business , bans of peaceful gatherings of too many people in one location ( in violation of “ social distancing ” requirements ) , and bans on religious worship by groups deemed to have too many people in one place of worship .
The First Amendment to the US Constitution lists the right to peaceably assemble and the right to free exercise of religion .
The First Amendment is part @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Rights .
Note that these amendments are not known as the Bill of Privileges or the Bill of Nice Things to be Purchased by Taxes .
The US Constitution could not have been ratified without the Bill of Rights , so these rights are fundamental to what it means to be an American .
There is no question that the COVID-19 lockdowns denied Americans these fundamental rights .
The only question is whether the denial of these rights was necessary .
Some proponents of lockdown start and end their argument by stating the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The magnitude of the number is supposed to end any further discussion .
Anyone who questions whether the lockdowns have actually saved any lives are dismissed as having a callous disregard for human life .
Back when the death toll from COVID-19 was around thirty thousand , I compared COVID-19 deaths to the annual deaths from influenza .
Some of my colleagues repeatedly notify me when the death toll from COVID-19 is updated .
Their point is that if deaths from COVID-19 exceed some arbitrary number the lockdowns will have been vindicated .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ whether the deaths occurred during lockdowns or not ; deaths from COVID-19 justify any action by government .
Comparisons with flu epidemics provide a frame of reference .
The point is that in the past American civilization somehow survived comparable crises with similar death tolls without requiring lockdowns .
Freedom of worship and freedom of peaceable assembly are constitutionally protected rights .
The only plausible justification for suspending those rights would be an imminent and credible threat to the existence of America that required immediate and united effort to avoid .
A final @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thousand or even 1 million would not change the argument despite being a substantially greater tragedy .
Some of my colleagues argue that life is priceless and is more important than any economic consideration .
This is contrary to the foundation of America .
During the debate over secession from Britain at the Second Virginia Convention held in 1775 , Patrick Henry asked the audience , which included Thomas Jefferson and George Washington , “ Is life so dear , or peace so sweet , as to be purchased at the price of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ concluded his address with a passionate answer : “ but as for me , give me liberty , or give me death !
” This quote is synonymous with a core American value : that the freedom to live one ’ s life as one chooses is even more important than life itself .
Individuals should choose whether the risks of socializing ( including risks of contracting COVID-19 ) are worth the benefits of social exchange .
It is not a matter of putting a dollar value on life ; it is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voluntarily in pursuit of happiness .
We could completely eliminate deaths from motor vehicle accidents by banning motor vehicles .
We continue to voluntarily use them , because the economic benefits of doing so are more valuable to us than the risks to our lives .
Another argument made by lockdown proponents is to “ follow the science.
” This is another phrase intended to end further discussion .
Scientific hypotheses must be falsifiable by observation .
The scientific method is the process of testing falsifiable hypotheses by empiric observations that either support @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” is never settled and is never closed to challenge or discussion .
What proponents of lockdowns mean by “ follow the science ” is that statements made by scientists should be accepted as axioms and that anyone who challenges these statements is an ignoramus or a conspiracy nut .
An obvious problem exists when different scientists make conflicting statements .
This problem is worse when the same scientist makes conflicting statements at different times .
As the debates over continuation or resumption of lockdowns continue , what is the current state of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Prevention ( CDC ) recently released their best estimate of symptomatic case fatality rates based on records of symptomatic cases , records of deaths , and antibody tests of wider populations .
The symptomatic case fatality rate is the risk of death after developing symptomatic disease .
This is different from the mortality rate , which is the number of deaths per hundred thousand .
The symptomatic case fatality rates are 0.5 deaths per thousand symptomatic cases for those under 50 years of age , 2 per thousand for those age 50–64 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over 65 .
As a frame of reference , the case fatality rate for the Spanish flu of 1918 was greater than 25 deaths per thousand cases .
The existing scientific data for COVID-19 do not justify the suspension of civil liberties .
The debate will always return to the total deaths , which now exceed one hundred thousand for the United States .
There is nothing extraordinary about the death toll from COVID-19 .
Total deaths in the US from all causes were 2,839,205 in 2018 .
The current mortality rate from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The total mortality rate in the US from all causes was 723.6 in 2018 .
The mortality rate in the US in 2018 was 163.6 for heart disease , 149.1 from cancer , 48.0 from unintentional injury ( including motor vehicle accidents ) , 39.7 from chronic noninfectious lung disease ( mostly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [ COPD ] ) , 37.1 from stroke , and 30.5 from Alzheimer ’ s disease .
The mortality rate from suicide was 14.2 in 2018 .
These comparisons do not ignore the tragedy of deaths from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of reference .
There is no evidence that lockdowns saved any lives .
Different political entities have tried different severities of lockdown .
Sweden tried a very liberal approach ; their mortality rate from COVID-19 was lower compared with some other countries with more severe lockdowns such as Britain , Spain , Italy , and France .
There is no clear relationship between severity of lockdown and mortality rates from COVID-19 for different states in the United States either .
New York had one of the strictest lockdowns and has the highest mortality @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 152.9 .
My own state of Texas had a relatively liberal lockdown and has a mortality rate from COVID-19 of 5.7 .
Texas had a mortality rate from motor vehicle accidents of 12.7 in 2018 .
More than twice as many people in Texas died from motor vehicle accidents in 2018 than have died from COVID-19 .
Each lockdown represents a different experiment in policy .
If we “ follow the science , ” we will conclude that lockdowns had little or no beneficial effect and that policy should be set at local @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or global levels .
Mandatory lockdowns should be ended .
We have enough data for individuals to make decisions about whether they should stay in the safety of their homes or risk their lives by socializing .
Young people are at the least risk from COVID-19 and have the most to lose by economic deprivation .
The elderly are at the highest risk and have the least to lose by staying at home since many are retired or disabled .
People who live in New York may very well make different choices from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ community of Lubbock , Texas , people have changed their behavior voluntarily .
Some people wear masks and others do not .
If you are afraid of those who do not , it is easy enough to avoid them .
I take outdoor walks .
During these walks , people wave to each other .
We give each other space voluntarily , but nobody calls in a SWAT team if some child or pet breaches the capricious and arbitrary six-foot barrier .
Calls for resuming lockdowns out of fear of second waves should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a very deep economic hole , and we need to stop digging it deeper .
Gilbert Berdine is an associate professor of medicine at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center and an affiliate of the Free Market Institute at Texas Tech University .

… A lockdown is one form of mandatory restriction of freedom of action.
Restrictions in the US have included bans on serving customers in restaurants and other places of business, bans of peaceful gatherings of too many people in one location (in violation of “social distancing” requirements), and bans on religious worship by groups deemed to have too many people in one place of worship.
The First Amendment to the US Constitution lists the right to peaceably assemble and the right to free exercise of religion. The First Amendment is part of what is called the Bill of Rights. Note that these amendments are not known as the Bill of Privileges or the Bill of Nice Things to be Purchased by Taxes.
The US Constitution could not have been ratified without the Bill of Rights, so these rights are fundamental to what it means to be an American.
There is no question that the COVID-19 lockdowns denied Americans these fundamental rights. The only question is whether the denial of these rights was necessary.
Some proponents of lockdown start and end their argument by stating the number of deaths attributed to COVID-19. The magnitude of the number is supposed to end any further discussion.
Anyone who questions whether the lockdowns have actually saved any lives are dismissed as having a callous disregard for human life. Back when the death toll from COVID-19 was around thirty thousand, I compared COVID-19 deaths to the annual deaths from influenza.
Some of my colleagues repeatedly notify me when the death toll from COVID-19 is updated. Their point is that if deaths from COVID-19 exceed some arbitrary number the lockdowns will have been vindicated.
It doesn’t seem to matter whether the deaths occurred during lockdowns or not; deaths from COVID-19 justify any action by government.
Comparisons with flu epidemics provide a frame of reference. The point is that in the past American civilization somehow survived comparable crises with similar death tolls without requiring lockdowns.
Freedom of worship and freedom of peaceable assembly are constitutionally protected rights.
The only plausible justification for suspending those rights would be an imminent and credible threat to the existence of America that required immediate and united effort to avoid.
A final death toll from COVID-19 of two hundred thousand or even 1 million would not change the argument despite being a substantially greater tragedy.
Some of my colleagues argue that life is priceless and is more important than any economic consideration. This is contrary to the foundation of America.
During the debate over secession from Britain at the Second Virginia Convention held in 1775, Patrick Henry asked the audience, which included Thomas Jefferson and George Washington, “Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?”
Patrick Henry concluded his address with a passionate answer: “but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!”
This quote is synonymous with a core American value: that the freedom to live one’s life as one chooses is even more important than life itself.
Individuals should choose whether the risks of socializing (including risks of contracting COVID-19) are worth the benefits of social exchange.
It is not a matter of putting a dollar value on life; it is a recognition that people regularly risk their lives voluntarily in pursuit of happiness.
We could completely eliminate deaths from motor vehicle accidents by banning motor vehicles. We continue to voluntarily use them, because the economic benefits of doing so are more valuable to us than the risks to our lives.
Another argument made by lockdown proponents is to “follow the science.” This is another phrase intended to end further discussion. Scientific hypotheses must be falsifiable by observation.
The scientific method is the process of testing falsifiable hypotheses by empiric observations that either support or reject them. The “science” is never settled and is never closed to challenge or discussion.
What proponents of lockdowns mean by “follow the science” is that statements made by scientists should be accepted as axioms and that anyone who challenges these statements is an ignoramus or a conspiracy nut.
An obvious problem exists when different scientists make conflicting statements. This problem is worse when the same scientist makes conflicting statements at different times.
As the debates over continuation or resumption of lockdowns continue, what is the current state of knowledge?
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently released their best estimate of symptomatic case fatality rates based on records of symptomatic cases, records of deaths, and antibody tests of wider populations.
The symptomatic case fatality rate is the risk of death after developing symptomatic disease. This is different from the mortality rate, which is the number of deaths per hundred thousand.
The symptomatic case fatality rates are 0.5 deaths per thousand symptomatic cases for those under 50 years of age, 2 per thousand for those age 50–64, and 13 per thousand for those over 65.
As a frame of reference, the case fatality rate for the Spanish flu of 1918 was greater than 25 deaths per thousand cases. The existing scientific data for COVID-19 do not justify the suspension of civil liberties.
The debate will always return to the total deaths, which now exceed one hundred thousand for the United States. There is nothing extraordinary about the death toll from COVID-19.
Total deaths in the US from all causes were 2,839,205 in 2018. The current mortality rate from COVID-19 in the US is 31.7. The total mortality rate in the US from all causes was 723.6 in 2018.
The mortality rate in the US in 2018 was 163.6 for heart disease, 149.1 from cancer, 48.0 from unintentional injury (including motor vehicle accidents), 39.7 from chronic noninfectious lung disease (mostly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]), 37.1 from stroke, and 30.5 from Alzheimer’s disease.
The mortality rate from suicide was 14.2 in 2018. These comparisons do not ignore the tragedy of deaths from COVID-19; the figures provide a frame of reference.
There is no evidence that lockdowns saved any lives. Different political entities have tried different severities of lockdown.
Sweden tried a very liberal approach; their mortality rate from COVID-19 was lower compared with some other countries with more severe lockdowns such as Britain, Spain, Italy, and France.
There is no clear relationship between severity of lockdown and mortality rates from COVID-19 for different states in the United States either.
New York had one of the strictest lockdowns and has the highest mortality rate from COVID-19 of all states at 152.9. My own state of Texas had a relatively liberal lockdown and has a mortality rate from COVID-19 of 5.7.
Texas had a mortality rate from motor vehicle accidents of 12.7 in 2018. More than twice as many people in Texas died from motor vehicle accidents in 2018 than have died from COVID-19. Each lockdown represents a different experiment in policy.
If we “follow the science,” we will conclude that lockdowns had little or no beneficial effect and that policy should be set at local levels rather than state, national, or global levels.
Mandatory lockdowns should be ended. We have enough data for individuals to make decisions about whether they should stay in the safety of their homes or risk their lives by socializing.
Young people are at the least risk from COVID-19 and have the most to lose by economic deprivation. The elderly are at the highest risk and have the least to lose by staying at home since many are retired or disabled.
People who live in New York may very well make different choices from people in Texas.
In my home community of Lubbock, Texas, people have changed their behavior voluntarily. Some people wear masks and others do not. If you are afraid of those who do not, it is easy enough to avoid them.
I take outdoor walks. During these walks, people wave to each other. We give each other space voluntarily, but nobody calls in a SWAT team if some child or pet breaches the capricious and arbitrary six-foot barrier.
Calls for resuming lockdowns out of fear of second waves should be ignored. The lockdowns have dug a very deep economic hole, and we need to stop digging it deeper.
Gilbert Berdine is an associate professor of medicine at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center and an affiliate of the Free Market Institute at Texas Tech University.
Source: MISES.org


humansarefree--2020-06-17--Abortionist Testifies: ‘No Question’ Babies Being Born Alive To Harvest Organs

Last week , a California abortionist testified under oath that there is “ no question ” abortionists are allowing babies to be born alive in order to harvest their organs , a report from LifeSiteNews revealed .
Testifying during a preliminary hearing in the criminal case against undercover journalists David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt earlier in the month , Dr. Forrest Smith outlined gruesome details of the abortion business , of which he said Daleiden and Merritt only captured the “ tip of the iceberg ” with their shocking undercover videos .
“ Smith testified that it is almost certain @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the undercover videos deliberately altered abortion procedures in a way that both led to the birth of living babies with beating hearts , and put women at risk .
The goal in these cases would be to obtain fresher , more intact organs , ” LifeSiteNews reported .
Smith , who has reportedly preformed some 50,000 abortions , reviewed a video from the 2014 Planned Parenthood conference as an expert for the defense .
Alisa Goldberg , who presented the video , “ spoke about using large doses of the drug misoprostol in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in one day rather than the four it usually takes , ” Live Action reported .
“ Smith testified that this would lead to a live birth .
Large doses of misoprostol , said Smith , would cause ‘ tumultuous labor ’ that leads to ‘ fetal expulsion ’ — meaning the baby would be born without any assistance from the abortionist and no instruments would be used .
He testified that very few abortionists other than Planned Parenthood do this.
” “ In this case clearly the intent is same-day surgery .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ into labor , ” Smith said .
When pressed if this would “ lead to a live birth , ” the abortionist answered : “ There ’ s no question in my mind that at least some of these fetuses were live births.
” Smith also noted that a baby would “ no question ” be born “ alive ” in cases where Digoxin , which is used to cause heart failure in abortions , is not used , according to Live Action .
“ No question it ’ s alive , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that a beating heart is what indicates a live or deceased baby — as opposed to “ no breathing ” or “ no movement.
” “ All testimony we have seen , no breathing , no movement , no cord ” he said , or “ arms , legs torn off , the assumption is : that is fetal demise .
But that ’ s completely wrong.
” Also read : StemExpress , Previously Involved In Trafficking Aborted Baby Body Parts , Admits To Keeping Babies Alive To Harvest Their Heads And Still-Beating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ particular jarring since Smith once loathed Daleiden and wished to expose him as a “ fraud.
” That changed when the doctor watched the undercover videos and spoke to Daleiden directly .
“ I ’ m going to take down that son of a bitch .
He ’ s f***ing with me now , ’ ” Smith told the court he said of Daleiden in 2015 .
According to LifeSiteNews , Smith then met with the journalist in August of that year with the intention of exposing “ Daleiden as a fraud.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ truth about the abortion industry and , chillingly , “ didn ’ t know the half of what was going on .
”

Last week, a California abortionist testified under oath that there is “no question” abortionists are allowing babies to be born alive in order to harvest their organs, a report from LifeSiteNews revealed.
Testifying during a preliminary hearing in the criminal case against undercover journalists David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt earlier in the month, Dr. Forrest Smith outlined gruesome details of the abortion business, of which he said Daleiden and Merritt only captured the “tip of the iceberg” with their shocking undercover videos.
“Smith testified that it is almost certain that some of the abortionists featured in the undercover videos deliberately altered abortion procedures in a way that both led to the birth of living babies with beating hearts, and put women at risk. The goal in these cases would be to obtain fresher, more intact organs,” LifeSiteNews reported.
Smith, who has reportedly preformed some 50,000 abortions, reviewed a video from the 2014 Planned Parenthood conference as an expert for the defense.
Alisa Goldberg, who presented the video, “spoke about using large doses of the drug misoprostol in order to carry out second-trimester induced abortions in one day rather than the four it usually takes,” Live Action reported.
“Smith testified that this would lead to a live birth. Large doses of misoprostol, said Smith, would cause ‘tumultuous labor’ that leads to ‘fetal expulsion’ — meaning the baby would be born without any assistance from the abortionist and no instruments would be used. He testified that very few abortionists other than Planned Parenthood do this.”
“In this case clearly the intent is same-day surgery. They fully intend to put the uterus into labor,” Smith said.
When pressed if this would “lead to a live birth,” the abortionist answered:
“There’s no question in my mind that at least some of these fetuses were live births.”
Smith also noted that a baby would “no question” be born “alive” in cases where Digoxin, which is used to cause heart failure in abortions, is not used, according to Live Action. “No question it’s alive,” Smith said.
The California abortionist said that a beating heart is what indicates a live or deceased baby — as opposed to “no breathing” or “no movement.”
“All testimony we have seen, no breathing, no movement, no cord” he said, or “arms, legs torn off, the assumption is: that is fetal demise. But that’s completely wrong.”
Also read: StemExpress, Previously Involved In Trafficking Aborted Baby Body Parts, Admits To Keeping Babies Alive To Harvest Their Heads And Still-Beating Hearts
The abortionist’s testimony was particular jarring since Smith once loathed Daleiden and wished to expose him as a “fraud.” That changed when the doctor watched the undercover videos and spoke to Daleiden directly.
“I’m going to take down that son of a bitch. He’s f***ing with me now,’” Smith told the court he said of Daleiden in 2015.
According to LifeSiteNews, Smith then met with the journalist in August of that year with the intention of exposing “Daleiden as a fraud.”
Smith soon realized Daleiden was exposing the truth about the abortion industry and, chillingly, “didn’t know the half of what was going on.”
Source: DailyWire.com


humansarefree--2020-06-17--FDA Bans Hydroxychloroquine For Covid: Bill Gates is Thrilled

Big pharma is thrilled today after the FDA has rescinded permission for the emergency use of hydroxychloroquine for the treatment @ @ @ @ @ two “ prestigious ” medical journals have recently been forced to withdraw publication of articles @ @ @ @ @ hydroxychloroquine .
The trials cited by the FDA did not include the critical component zinc @ @ @ @ @ was thus doomed to fail .
That leaves enormously expensive new drugs in trial and @ @ @ @ @ “ only way ” to end the coronahysteria .
Meanwhile states are pushing the idea @ @ @ @ @ ” and are eyeing another shutdown .
Also read : Association Of American Physicians And @ @ @ @ @ Irrational ’ Interference Of Access To Life-Saving Hydroxychloroquine

Big pharma is thrilled today after the FDA has rescinded permission for the emergency use of hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of Covid-19.
This after two “prestigious” medical journals have recently been forced to withdraw publication of articles critical of the use of hydroxychloroquine.
The trials cited by the FDA did not include the critical component zinc according to critics, and was thus doomed to fail.
That leaves enormously expensive new drugs in trial and the elusive jjab as the “only way” to end the coronahysteria. Meanwhile states are pushing the idea of a “second wave” and are eyeing another shutdown.
Also read: Association Of American Physicians And Surgeons Sues FDA For ‘Irrational’ Interference Of Access To Life-Saving Hydroxychloroquine
Source: YouTube.com


humansarefree--2020-06-18--71% of Americans Reject Privacy Killing Contact Tracing Apps (So Do Europeans)

Almost three quarters of Americans say they will not submit their privacy to contact tracing apps , with Europeans also rejecting the notion outright because they do not trust government to keep their information safe and refrain from misusing it .
A study from Avira reveals that the vast majority of Americans are against contact tracing apps , with 71 percent saying they will not download them , and 75 % believing their digital privacy is at risk from the technology .
The poll found that only 14 percent believe the government would protect their data effectively .
When asked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than the government , 32 percent said they would feel safe giving Apple or Google their data .
The study also noted that those working in Government and Healthcare are the least-likely to download the technology , with 84 % of people from these sectors saying they will not use the apps .
“ We believe these survey results send a clear signal to both app creators and the government .
COVID contact tracing apps could fail before they launch if developers don ’ t communicate to the public how they plan to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , in Germany people are also rejecting the contact tracing technology owing to privacy concerns .
The amount of people willing to use the apps has fallen to 42 percent , according to polling data from Forschungsgruppe Wahlen .
Statista notes that the latest data indicates a 6 percentage point drop since April : In Norway , the technology has been completely abandoned after it was deemed to be too invasive .
Amnesty International has warned that contact tracing apps like Norway ’ s are “ most alarming mass surveillance tools ” .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ include the US contact tracing app .
In the UK , despite touting it for months , the government has ( predictably ) failed to roll out its contact tracing app because of bureaucracy .
Cybersecurity experts also analysed the source code of the app and found no less than seven major flaws .

Almost three quarters of Americans say they will not submit their privacy to contact tracing apps, with Europeans also rejecting the notion outright because they do not trust government to keep their information safe and refrain from misusing it.
by Steve Watson
A study from Avira reveals that the vast majority of Americans are against contact tracing apps, with 71 percent saying they will not download them, and 75% believing their digital privacy is at risk from the technology.
The poll found that only 14 percent believe the government would protect their data effectively.
When asked if they would trust big tech more than the government, 32 percent said they would feel safe giving Apple or Google their data.
The study also noted that those working in Government and Healthcare are the least-likely to download the technology, with 84% of people from these sectors saying they will not use the apps.
Travis Witteveen, CEO of Avira commented:
“We believe these survey results send a clear signal to both app creators and the government. COVID contact tracing apps could fail before they launch if developers don’t communicate to the public how they plan to protect people’s privacy.”
Meanwhile, in Germany people are also rejecting the contact tracing technology owing to privacy concerns.
The amount of people willing to use the apps has fallen to 42 percent, according to polling data from Forschungsgruppe Wahlen.
Statista notes that the latest data indicates a 6 percentage point drop since April:
In Norway, the technology has been completely abandoned after it was deemed to be too invasive.
Amnesty International has warned that contact tracing apps like Norway’s are “most alarming mass surveillance tools”. The organisation’s assessment did not include the US contact tracing app.
In the UK, despite touting it for months, the government has (predictably) failed to roll out its contact tracing app because of bureaucracy.
Cybersecurity experts also analysed the source code of the app and found no less than seven major flaws.


humansarefree--2020-06-18--Children Recruited in U.K. for COVID-19 Vaccine Trial

The University of Oxford ’ s Jenner Institute and Oxford Vaccine Group in the United Kingdom has announced that its researchers have begun recruiting children aged five to 12 years for phase II and phase III clinical trials testing an experimental COVID-19 vaccine the university is developing in partnership with AstraZeneca plc.1 Oxford ’ s ChAdOx1 nCov-19 ( “ chimpanzee adenovirus Oxford 1 ” novel coronavirus-19 ) recombinant vaccine is made from a genetically modified adenovirus that infects chimpanzees used as a viral vector into which the COVID-19 genome is inserted so the cells of the human body express the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ S ) and induce antibodies that are supposed to prevent infection.2 Some researchers have noted that , “ Viral vector-based vaccines require assessment of efficacy and safety , including immunogenicity , genetic stability , ability to evade pre-existing immunity , replication deficiency or attenuation , and genotoxicity.
” 3 Others have emphasized that the selection of an appropriate viral vector for a new vaccine depends upon “ a thorough knowledge of the infectious agent for which the viral-vectored vaccine is being developed.
” 4 There are gaps in scientific knowledge about the origin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mechanisms involved in the way it infects and causes disease in humans but , like most COVID-19 vaccines being fast tracked to licensure , the vaccine being created by Oxford/AstraZeneca is compressing clinical trials testing into months rather than years .
The phase I trial began in April when over 1,000 healthy adult volunteers received their experimental “ ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 ” vaccine .
Phase II expanded the age range to include those aged five to 12 years , 56 to 69 years , and those over age 70 to assess the immune response @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ages and find out if the immune system responses of older people and children are different .
The phase III part of the study assesses how the vaccine works in a larger number of people over age 18 in terms of preventing infection and symptoms of COVID-19 .
In the U.K. , recruitment of children to participate in vaccine trials is usually done through doctors ’ offices and by health care workers .
The experimental vaccine being tested in clinical trials is often given at home and parents are asked to take regular @ @ @ @ @ @ @ child ’ s reaction , with follow-up visits and blood tests.5 There is no financial incentive to join the vaccine trial , and parents can withdraw their child at any point .
The clinical trial team also gives the child participant other routine vaccinations during home visits for the length of the study.6 Personal benefit and contributing to “ the greater good ” are the two most common reasons parents cite for enrolling their children in vaccine trials , according to Shamez Ladhani , MRCPCH , PhD , a pediatric infectious disease consultant @ @ @ @ @ @ @ London , and consultant epidemiologist for Public Health England .
He commented that , while there are risks , vaccine adverse reactions are rare—so much so that they often don ’ t get noticed until the vaccine goes on sale and is given to many more patients .
Dr. Ladhani , who is frequently involved in vaccine trials , said : Some side effects you actually don ’ t find out until you have given 100,000 doses—that ’ s always a worry—but there isn ’ t a clinical trial that ’ s big @ @ @ @ @ @ @ appear to be less affected by COVID-19 , although their role in transmission of the virus remains unclear .
In the U.S. , 1.7 percent of COVID-19 cases for which age was known occurred in children younger than 18 years , even though they make up 22 percent of the U.S. population.8 Additionally , relatively few children with COVID-19 are hospitalized , and fewer children than adults experience fever , cough , or shortness of breath .
Children May or May Not Be Last to Get COVID-19 Vaccine As scientists race to develop @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that children could be among the last to be vaccinated.9 The process for testing a COVID-19 vaccine in children could take “ extra months and maybe years longer , ” according to Paul Duprex , PhD , Director of the Center for Vaccine Research and professor of microbiology and molecular genetics at the University of Pittsburgh .
However , Anthony Fauci , MD , director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ( NIAID ) and a member of the White House Coronavirus Task Force , commented that it ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ catch up ” to those in adults , if they are done correctly .
“ There is no reason not to believe that [ a vaccine ] wouldn ’ t be available simultaneously for adults and children , ” Dr. Fauci said.10 Duke University Professor Sallie Permar , MD , believes children are “ key ” to ending the COVID-19 pandemic and testing vaccines in children must be a priority because , “ If we prioritize children now in the steps we take to end this pandemic , we will protect them while @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In USA Today , she recently advocated for experimental coronavirus vaccines to be tested in children once safety testing in adults is completed:11 Early trials of coronavirus vaccine safety and immune responses have excluded children .
Once safety testing is completed in adult volunteers , however , leading candidate vaccines should be tested for safety and effectiveness in children .
And once safety and efficacy are established , children should be among the first to receive the vaccine .
Throughout history , scientists have consistently found that infants and children are not simply @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and maturing immune systems function differently from adults,12 which is why pharmaceutical products are often studied separately in children and adults .
Already , scientists are pointing out differences in immune system responses by children to COVID-19 infections compared to responses by adults , who are at increased risk for complications.13 The University of Oxford and AstraZeneca researchers are proceeding with testing the experimental ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine in children , even though a May 13 , 2020 published report indicated that small trials of the vaccine in mice and monkeys were not successful @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the animal trials provided evidence that the experimental vaccine induced a “ robust humoral and cell mediated response ” in mice and appeared to protect against development of viral pneumonia in monkeys , it did not prevent infection with COVID-19.14 15 On June 5 , 2020 , Market Watch reported that AstraZeneca has begun manufacturing two billion doses of Oxford ’ s COVID-19 vaccine before clinical trials have been completed and results analyzed and published , reportedly in August .
AstraZeneca has received more than $ 1B in funding from the U.S. government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deliver 300 million doses to the U.S. , which will include a Phase 3 clinical trial in the U.S. this summer involving 30,000 volunteer participants.16 AstraZeneca has struck a $ 750 million agreement with backed by [ Bill ] Gates and his wife Melinda — the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations and Gavi , the vaccine alliance—to provide and distribute 300 million doses fairly across the world .
AstraZeneca has also agreed to supply the Serum Institute of India with 1 billion doses for low and middle-income countries , with a commitment to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2020.17 The company has indicated that as many as 30 million doses could be available in Britain as early as September 2020 and the U.S. could begin receiving supplies of the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine as early as October.18 Anthony Fauci , AstraZeneca , Barbara Cáceres , Barbara Loe Fisher , Bill Gates , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , children , Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations , COVID-19 , Gavi , Jenner Institute , Market Watch , National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases , NIAID , Oxford Vaccine Group , Paul Duprex , Shamez Ladhani @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , University of Pittsburgh , USA Today , White House Coronavirus Task Force

The world first started to hear about a novel coronavirus in early January 2020, with reports of an alleged new pneumonia-like illness spreading across Wuhan, China. However, the world did not actually know of Covid-19 until February 2020, because it was not until the 11th of that month that the World Health Organisation officially named the novel coronavirus disease Covid-19.
So with this being the official truth, why does United States Government data show that the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) awarded a contract on the 12th November 2019 to Labyrinth Global Health INC. for ‘COVID-19 Research’, at least one month before the alleged emergence of the novel coronavirus, and three months before it was officially dubbed Covid-19?
The shocking findings, however, do not end there. The contract awarded in November 2019 for ‘COVID-19 Research’ was not only instructed to take place in Ukraine, it was in fact part of a much larger contract for a ‘Biological threat reduction program in Ukraine’.
Perhaps explaining why Labyrinth Global Health has been collaborating with Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance, and Ernest Wolfe’s Metabiota since its formation in 2017.
The Government of the United States has a website called ‘USA Spending‘, an official open data source of federal spending information. According to the site as of 12th April 2021, the US Government has spent a mind-blowing $3.63 trillion “in response to COVID-19”. But that’s not the only information on Covid that can be found on the site.
Hidden within the ‘Award Search’ are details on a contract awarded by the Department of Defense to a company named ‘Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp‘, which is allegedly “a global engineering, procurement, consulting and construction company specialising in infrastructure development”.
The contract was awarded on September 20th, 2012 and is described as “Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services”. Obviously, this is very vague and most likely of little interest to anyone who happens to stumble across it. But there is something contained deep within the details that should be of interest to anyone and everyone.
The ‘Award History’ for the contract contains a tab for ‘Sub-Awards’ detailing the recipients, action date, amount, and a very brief description for 115 Sub-Award transactions. Most of the Sub-Awards are extremely mundane for things such as “laboratory equipment for Kyiv”, or “office furniture for Kyiv”.
But there is one Sub-Award that stands out among the rest, and it was awarded to Labyrinth Global Health INC for “SME Manuscript Documentation and COVID-19 Research”.
An award for Covid-19 research isn’t exactly shocking when the world is allegedly in the grip of a Covid-19 pandemic, but considering the fact the sub-contract was awarded 12th November 2019, at least one month before the alleged emergence of the novel coronavirus, and three months before it was officially dubbed Covid-19, the award for Covid-19 research should come as a shock to everyone.
But the shock doesn’t end there, because the place the contact for Covid-19 research was instructed to take place was Ukraine, as was the entire contract awarded by the DOD to Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
The contract details found on the ‘USA Spending’ site actually reveal that the specific DOD department that awarded the contract was the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA). The contract was awarded 20th September 2012, and concluded on 13th October 2020.
Whilst the details are vague, the US Government site also reveals that $21.7 million of the $116.6 million contract was spent on a ‘Biological threat reduction program in Ukraine’.
Why did the Department of Defense pay a company that is allegedly “a global engineering, procurement, consulting and construction company specialising in infrastructure development”, to help implement a “Biological threat reduction program in Ukraine’?
And why did both the DOD and said company then pay Labyrinth Global Health INC to carry out COVID-19 research in Ukraine at least one month before the alleged emergence of the novel coronavirus, and three months before it was officially dubbed Covid-19?
Founded in 2017, Labyrinth Global Health is allegedly a “women-owned small business with deep expertise and a proven track record supporting initiatives for scientific and medical advancement.”
They describe themselves as “a multicultural and international organization with offices in four countries and a team of experts with diverse backgrounds and competencies, including microbiology, virology, global health, emerging infectious disease nursing, medical anthropology, field epidemiology, clinical research, and health information systems.”
One of those offices just happens to be located in Kyiv, Ukraine, which the company dubs “a gateway to Eastern Europe”.
The leadership team of Labyrinth Global consists of Karen Saylors, PHD who is the Chief Executive Officer; Mary Guttieri, PHS who is the Chief Science Officer; and Murat Tartan who is the Chief Financial Officer.
Karen Saylors, PhD, who co-founded Labyrinth Global Health, has allegedly worked in the international public health field for over a decade and has spent many years living in Africa establishing global surveillance networks, “working with partners to improve Global Health policy on infectious disease detection, response, and control”.
At Labyrinth, Dr Saylors specialises in studies that aim to understand and mitigate the biological and behavioural risks of disease transmission. Dr Saylors worked with Oxford University Clinical Trials Network in Vietnam on zoonotic disease surveillance research and continues to coordinate with regional partners on emerging outbreaks in animal and human populations.
But who are the partners that Dr Karen Saylors and Labyrinth Global Health choose to work with? They are none other than the ‘Eco-Health Alliance’ and ‘Metabiota’.
Dr Karen Saylors, Eco-Health Alliance and Metabiota worked together on the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) ‘PREDICT’ program from 2009, while Labyrinth Global Health worked alongside EHA and Metabiota on the PREDICT program from 2017.
Launched in 2009 and funded by USAID, PREDICT was an early warning system for new and emerging diseases in 21 countries. It was led by the University of California’s (“UC”) Davis One Health Institute and core partners included EcoHealth Alliance (“EHA”), Metabiota, Wildlife Conservation Society, and Smithsonian Institution, and as we’ve just revealed; Labyrinth Global Health. PREDICT was a forerunner of the more ambitious Global Virome Project.
The USAID describes PREDICT as having made “significant contributions to strengthening global surveillance and laboratory diagnostic capabilities for both known and newly discovered viruses within several important virus groups, such as filoviruses (including ebolaviruses), influenza viruses, paramyxoviruses, and coronaviruses“.
Here’s one of the many studies published by Eco Health Alliance, Metabiota and Labyrinth Global Health proving the connection –
PREDICT partnered with the non-profit Eco Health Alliance (EHA) to carry out its 9-year effort to catalogue hundreds of thousands of biological samples, “including over 10,000 bats.” A PREDICT-funded 2015 study on “diversity of coronavirus in bats” also included Peter Daszak, president of EHA, among its participants.
Eco Health Alliance is listed as a partner of the Wuhan Institute of Virology (“WIV”) on archived pages of its website and was mentioned as one of the institute’s “strategic partners” by the WIV’s Deputy Director-General in 2018.
Notably, the relationship between the WIV and the American Biodefense establishment was advanced by EHA policy advisor, David R. Franz, former commander at the US bioweapons lab at Fort Detrick.
WIV’s Dr. Shi Zhengli, a.k.a. “Batwoman,” had also worked with EHA’s Daszak on bat-related studies. As far back as 2005, Daszak and Zhengli were conducting research on SARS-like coronaviruses in bats. Several PREDICT-funded studies on SARS-like coronaviruses and Swine Flu count with both Zhengli’s and Daszak’s contributions. Perhaps the most noteworthy of these is a 2015 PREDICT and NIH-funded study she co-authored entitled: ‘A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence’.
Meanwhile, Nathan Wolfe is the founder of Metabiota and the non-profit Global Viral. He spent over eight years conducting biomedical research in both sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia. Unsurprisingly, Wolfe is a World Economic Forum Young Global Leader. More notably, since 2008 he had been a member of DARPA’s DSRC, Defence Science Research Council, until it was disbanded.
All of these people and organisations have been working for at least the last decade studying coronaviruses and helping to set up Biolabs in Ukraine. All using US Department of Defense funds to do so. You can read much more about this here, here and here.
Must-read: Russian Defence Ministry: US-Funded Bio Labs In Ukraine Conducted Research Into Bat Coronavirus.
Putting the Biolabs in Ukraine to one side, for now, let’s return to the subject of Covid-19. If the US Government was funding Covid-19 research before Covid-19 was publicly known to exist then this suggests they either knew Covid-19 existed naturally, or they were involved in constructing this virus in a lab.
But if the contract evidence isn’t enough for you to come to this conclusion (it should be), then perhaps coupling it with evidence that the US National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and Moderna had a coronavirus candidate in December 2019 will be.
A confidentiality agreement which can be viewed here, states that providers ‘Moderna’ alongside the ‘National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) agreed to transfer ‘mRNA coronavirus jjab candidates’ developed and jointly-owned by NIAID and Moderna to recipients ‘The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’ on the 12th December 2019.
The material transfer agreement was signed the December 12th 2019 by Ralph Baric, PhD, at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and then signed by Jacqueline Quay, Director of Licensing and Innovation Support at the University of North Carolina on December 16th 2019. The agreement was also signed by two representatives of the NIAID, one of whom was Amy F. Petrik PhD, a technology transfer specialist who signed the agreement on December 12th 2019 at 8:05 am. The other signatory was Barney Graham MD PhD, an investigator for the NIAID, however, this signature was not dated. The final signatories on the agreement were Sunny Himansu, Moderna’s Investigator, and Shaun Ryan, Moderna’s Deputy General Councel. Both signautres were made on December 17th 2019. All of these signatures were made prior to any knowledge of the alleged emergence of the novel coronavirus. It wasn’t until December 31st 2019 that the World Health Organisation (WHO) became aware of an alleged cluster of viral pneumonia cases in Wuhan, China. But even at this point, they had not determined that an alleged new coronavirus was to blame, instead stating the pneumonia was of “unknown cause”. All of this requires much further research to fit all of the pieces of the puzzle together, but here’s what we definitely know so far – A novel coronavirus emerged in Wuhan in December 2019.
The world did not get to hear about this novel coronavirus until early January 2020.
The world did not know this novel coronavirus was called Covid-19 until February 2020, when the World Health Organization officially named it so.
The US Department of Defense awarded a contract for Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services to Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp‘, which is allegedly “a global engineering, procurement, consulting and construction company specialising in infrastructure development”.
That contract involved a Biological threat reduction program in Ukraine.
As part of this larger contract, another contract was awarded to Labyrinth Global Health for ‘COVID-19 Research’ on 12th November 2019.
This was awarded at least one month before the alleged emergence of the novel coronavirus, and three months before it was officially dubbed Covid-19.
Labyrinth Global Health works alongside the ‘Eco Health Alliance’, and ‘Metabiota’, and participated in the USAID PREDICT program. All of these people and organisations have been working for at least the past decade studying coronaviruses and helping to set up Biolabs in Ukraine. All using US Department of Defense funds to do so.
Information found here points to Eco Health Alliance having a hand in creating the Covid-19 virus.
Information found here points to Moderna having a hand in creating the Covid-19 virus.
‘Moderna’, alongside the ‘National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases’ (NIAID) agreed to tranfer ‘mRNA coronavirus jjab candidates’ developed and jointly-owned by NIAID and Moderna, to recipients ‘The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’ on the 12th December 2019.
Source: Expose-News.com


humansarefree--2020-06-18--Sightings of UFOs in Argentina Continue After a Swiss Man Builds a Landing Pad and Disappears

UFO sightings in Argentina have been frequent in recent years .
The sightings follow the bizarre story of a man from Switzerland who traveled to the small town of Cachi to create a spectacular landing pad for aliens called an “ ovniport.
” Similar to the Nazca Lines of Peru , the ovniport pattern is visible from the air .
The story of Werner Jaisli is mysterious since he seems to have disappeared from the news following completion of his beautiful design in an isolated Argentinian desert valley in 2012 .
He started working on a huge star with 36 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he finished , it was over 157 feet across , with a smaller star of 12 points in the middle .
Smaller stars and formations appear nearby .
The work began like some kind of alien Field of Dreams .
“ If you build it , we will come there , ” the beings told him telepathically .
The New Zealand Herald suggests some locals think he was taken away by the aliens .
“ …soon after the ovniport was built , locals around Cachi stopped seeing Jaisli , who had a large @ @ @ @ @ @ @ outfit .
“ It is unclear where he traveled to but some locals joked that he may have been abducted by aliens .
However , it is thought he actually went to Bolivia – with another theory that he traveled back to Switzerland.
“ Werner Jaisli said he received a telepathic message from the aliens , instructing him to build the landing pad .
According to his description in an Argentinian newspaper , Jaisli sensed the arrival of the UFO before it happened , and could easily communicate through a powerful light .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Alto with my neighbor Luis .
It was midnight on November 24 , 2008 .
A party was taking place at the Sports Complex .
Suddenly everything was silent and the power supply was cut off .
It was total darkness .
“ It ’ s a UFO night , ” I said to Luis .
And the sentence had not ended when two luminous objects advanced about 200 meters above the Calchaquí River , ” explains Werner .
“ They were at the height of my eyes , from my position .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ like burnished metal .
I do not know why , but mentally I asked them to come closer .
And they did !
“ They perched about 100 meters above our heads and projected over us a beam of powerful light .
The funny thing is that this extraordinary glow did not affect our vision .
At that moment something began to go through my brain : it was an order .
They asked me telepathically to build a landing pad.
” In the Argentinian newspaper , El Tribuno , he described his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ landed about 100 meters above our heads and projected on us a beam of light that made us both see their own brightness.
” “ The funny thing is that it did not affect our vision .
Something began to bubble through my brain : it was an order .
They asked me telepathically to build the airport.
” Since his disappearance , the “ Intergalactic landing pad ” has become a popular tourist attraction for the town of Cachi , while UFO sightings seem to have increased in other parts of Argentina @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an Argentinian news source reported that Werner Jaisli has returned to the area in July 2019 .
According to the translation from Google : The Swiss Werner Jaisli returned to Cachi after five years to resume the construction of the UFO.
” “ About the eccentric Werner nothing had been known for years and today he was finally seen again and confessed that he had to leave for a dangerous situation he lived and for which he could not say goodbye to anyone .
“ This place has something sacred for me , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” he confessed to El Tribuno.
“ In 2018 , a UFO appeared on live video during C5N news morning weather forecast in Argentina ’ s capital of Buenos Aires .
The morning show hosts were baffled by the object , pointing to it and discussing what it might be .
“ It ’ s not an airplane , it ’ s moving very fast , ” exclaims host Mariela Fernande .
Meteorologist Diego Ángeli replied , “ Of course , it ’ s making strange turns , and if you can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a UFO.
” Last month on May 7 , 2019 , construction workers in Buenos Aires took video from their cell phones of a strange “ black ring ” object hovering in the sky .
Express noted that Scott C Waring , a conspiracy theorist from the ET Database blog observed that the workers seemed to sense the presence of the UFO , looking right at it as it went over .
Waring suggests that UFOs sighting sometimes coincide with reports of an unexplainable “ aura ” and telepathic communication , causing viewers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a UFO is nearby , people and animals sense its presence .
I mean often they have an emotional aura that either pushes a person to look up and see it , or even make you relax almost in a trance meditative state .
“ You have to seen one first had and feel it to know what I ’ m saying .
Not all UFOs have this aura , but many do.
” “ I remember a sighting by the famous actor Dan Aykroyd where he was sleeping he woke up as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and heard a telepathic voice telling him to walk outside and look at the sky .
When he did so , he saw a UFO .
That ’ s what I mean.
” Waring has discussed several other recent UFO sightings in Argentina since then , including a video of a classic silver disc seen on May 13 .
Argentina continues to be a hot spot for UFO sightings .
The mysteries continue to grow while the answers remain in the blurry shadows of poor-quality video footage .
Meanwhile , where in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about the “ Ovnipuerto Cachi ” below :

UFO sightings in Argentina have been frequent in recent years. The sightings follow the bizarre story of a man from Switzerland who traveled to the small town of Cachi to create a spectacular landing pad for aliens called an “ovniport.”
Similar to the Nazca Lines of Peru, the ovniport pattern is visible from the air.
The story of Werner Jaisli is mysterious since he seems to have disappeared from the news following completion of his beautiful design in an isolated Argentinian desert valley in 2012.
He started working on a huge star with 36 points in 2008. By the time he finished, it was over 157 feet across, with a smaller star of 12 points in the middle. Smaller stars and formations appear nearby.
The work began like some kind of alien Field of Dreams.
“If you build it, we will come there,” the beings told him telepathically.
The New Zealand Herald suggests some locals think he was taken away by the aliens.
“…soon after the ovniport was built, locals around Cachi stopped seeing Jaisli, who had a large beard and would often wear a Druid outfit.
“It is unclear where he traveled to but some locals joked that he may have been abducted by aliens. However, it is thought he actually went to Bolivia – with another theory that he traveled back to Switzerland.“
Werner Jaisli said he received a telepathic message from the aliens, instructing him to build the landing pad.
According to his description in an Argentinian newspaper, Jaisli sensed the arrival of the UFO before it happened, and could easily communicate through a powerful light.
“I was there, in Fuerte Alto with my neighbor Luis. It was midnight on November 24, 2008. A party was taking place at the Sports Complex. Suddenly everything was silent and the power supply was cut off. It was total darkness.
“It’s a UFO night,” I said to Luis. And the sentence had not ended when two luminous objects advanced about 200 meters above the Calchaquí River,” explains Werner.
“They were at the height of my eyes, from my position. They were solid, circular and looked like burnished metal. I do not know why, but mentally I asked them to come closer. And they did!
“They perched about 100 meters above our heads and projected over us a beam of powerful light. The funny thing is that this extraordinary glow did not affect our vision. At that moment something began to go through my brain: it was an order. They asked me telepathically to build a landing pad.”
In the Argentinian newspaper, El Tribuno, he described his alleged encounter with extraterrestrials.
“They landed about 100 meters above our heads and projected on us a beam of light that made us both see their own brightness.”
“The funny thing is that it did not affect our vision. Something began to bubble through my brain: it was an order. They asked me telepathically to build the airport.”
Cachi explotará el atractivo turístico del ovnipuertohttps://t.co/LQvua06JYQ pic.twitter.com/kmtrPuQhAF — El Tribuno (@eltribuno) November 19, 2017
Since his disappearance, the “Intergalactic landing pad” has become a popular tourist attraction for the town of Cachi, while UFO sightings seem to have increased in other parts of Argentina instead.
Update: El Tribuno, an Argentinian news source reported that Werner Jaisli has returned to the area in July 2019. According to the translation from Google:
The Swiss Werner Jaisli returned to Cachi after five years to resume the construction of the UFO.”
“About the eccentric Werner nothing had been known for years and today he was finally seen again and confessed that he had to leave for a dangerous situation he lived and for which he could not say goodbye to anyone.
“This place has something sacred for me, I was sure that I should return,” he confessed to El Tribuno.“
UFOs in Argentina
In 2018, a UFO appeared on live video during C5N news morning weather forecast in Argentina’s capital of Buenos Aires. The morning show hosts were baffled by the object, pointing to it and discussing what it might be.
“It’s not an airplane, it’s moving very fast,” exclaims host Mariela Fernande. Meteorologist Diego Ángeli replied, “Of course, it’s making strange turns, and if you cannot identify it, it’s a UFO.”
Last month on May 7, 2019, construction workers in Buenos Aires took video from their cell phones of a strange “black ring” object hovering in the sky.
Express noted that Scott C Waring, a conspiracy theorist from the ET Database blog observed that the workers seemed to sense the presence of the UFO, looking right at it as it went over.
Waring suggests that UFOs sighting sometimes coincide with reports of an unexplainable “aura” and telepathic communication, causing viewers to take notice.
Waring explained:
“Often when a UFO is nearby, people and animals sense its presence. I mean often they have an emotional aura that either pushes a person to look up and see it, or even make you relax almost in a trance meditative state.
“You have to seen one first had and feel it to know what I’m saying. Not all UFOs have this aura, but many do.”
“I remember a sighting by the famous actor Dan Aykroyd where he was sleeping he woke up as if someone wanted to wake him, and heard a telepathic voice telling him to walk outside and look at the sky. When he did so, he saw a UFO. That’s what I mean.”
Waring has discussed several other recent UFO sightings in Argentina since then, including a video of a classic silver disc seen on May 13.
Argentina continues to be a hot spot for UFO sightings. The mysteries continue to grow while the answers remain in the blurry shadows of poor-quality video footage. Meanwhile, where in the world is Werner Jaisli?
See more about the “Ovnipuerto Cachi” below:
Reference: Ancient-code.com


humansarefree--2020-06-18--Facebook Using ‘Fact-checkers’ to Censor Dissent on Covid19

Facebook has flagged our article “ It ’ s all bullsh*t ” : 3 links sinking the Covid narrative ” as ‘ false information ’ , based on nothing but a single ‘ fact check ’ website , which does not even claim the information is ‘ false ’ , but merely quibbles over terminologies to justify claiming the information is ‘ misleading.
’ This is what you see today if you try to access that article on Facebook : And if you click on the ‘ see why ’ button you get taken here , to the website of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” .
Of course , they ’ re not independent – they ’ re actually funded by Facebook .
They are also funded by the “ Credibility Coalition ” , an NGO focused on “ common standards for information credibility ” .
The Credibility Coalition are also funded by Facebook .
And twitter .
And google .
And a whole host of unsavoury sounding NGOs .
So , with the idea that “ health feedback ” are anywhere close to “ independent ” firmly debunked , let ’ s see what they have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s important to note what is actually being “ fact-checked ” here .
It is not that the three documents were leaked .
It is not the accuracy of the quotes used .
It is not the statistics cited .
In fact , not a single factual claim is being called “ false ” .
In short , Facebook is well aware that 90 % of the article is perfectly provably true .
In fact , it ’ s not our article they ’ re allegedly fact-checking , it ’ s another article @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on one of the same sources we do .
The “ fact-check ” is entirely devoted to just one of three leaks we describe – the report from German Interior Ministry employee – and even then focuses solely on its provenance rather than its content .
In essence , what is being “ fact-checked ” is not the report itself , but where it came from .
Nowhere in this ‘ rebuttal ’ does it claim the ‘ German Ministry employee ’ was lying or making provably false statements .
Neither does it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the “ independent scientists ” who co-authored the report .
Instead , it uses diversionary language claiming the document ’ s main author , Stephan Kohn , was simply sharing his “ private opinion ” and was not authorised to speak for the government .
The author of the document is Stephan Kohn , a politologist and employee of Germany ’ s Interior Ministry in the KM 4 department for the Protection of Critical Infrastructures .
However , Kohn ’ s analysis was not requested by the Interior Ministry , as the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Germany ’ s Interior Ministry issued a press release stating that the employee had disseminated his “ private opinion on the corona crisis management ” and that the “ elaboration was carried out outside the area of responsibility as well as without assignment and authorization ” .
This approach should be hauntingly familiar to anyone who has been following the OPCW whistleblower story .
Where expert witnesses contradicting the official narrative on Douma were claimed to merely be “ disgruntled ex-employees ” who were in Syria of their own accord and “ never @ @ @ @ @ @ @ All these claims have since been shown to be lies .
In addition to these irrelevant obfuscations , the article uses weasel words to construct a flimsy counter-argument : According to EuroMOMO , the number of excess deaths coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic was twice the number that occurred during the unusually deadly flu seasons of 2017 , 2018 , and 2019 ( Figure 1 ) .
Note that they only back three years in time , and not all the way to 2000 or 1998 , both of which had very similar @ @ @ @ @ @ @ say “ coinciding with ” , and not “ caused by ” .
This allows them to cite all the excess deaths in Europe , despite statistics showing that huge numbers the excess deaths were due to other causes – including the lockdown limiting access to healthcare and increasing poverty .
They are using excess deaths caused by the lockdown , to argue against the accuracy of a report warning that the lockdown will cause excess deaths .
It is going full Orwell .
And it is utterly disgusting .
This article simply @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our article reporting Kohn ’ s words as ‘ false information ’ .
The information is NOT demonstrably false , it is merely contentious , in that the data is open to multiple interpretations .
In fact , the article admits that itself – only able to label the claim as “ misleading ” or “ unsupported ” .
Nowhere do they use the word “ disinformation ” or “ misinformation ” or “ false information ” .
Not once .
And yet that is the label facebook has stuck on it .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ it contains false information at all , it is censoring it because it offers an interpretation of facts that does not support the current mainstream dogma .
This is censorship , pure and simple .
Here are the censorship-free social media accounts where you can find HumansAreFree.com : • AllSocial.com ( all of your followers will see what you share )

Facebook has flagged our article “It’s all bullsh*t”: 3 links sinking the Covid narrative” as ‘false information’, based on nothing but a single ‘fact check’ website, which does not even claim the information is ‘false’, but merely quibbles over terminologies to justify claiming the information is ‘misleading.’
This is what you see today if you try to access that article on Facebook:
And if you click on the ‘see why’ button you get taken here, to the website of Health Feedback, an “independent fact-checker”.
Of course, they’re not independent – they’re actually funded by Facebook. They are also funded by the “Credibility Coalition”, an NGO focused on “common standards for information credibility”.
The Credibility Coalition are also funded by Facebook. And twitter. And google. And a whole host of unsavoury sounding NGOs.
So, with the idea that “health feedback” are anywhere close to “independent” firmly debunked, let’s see what they have to say.
Firstly, it’s important to note what is actually being “fact-checked” here.
It is not that the three documents were leaked. It is not the accuracy of the quotes used. It is not the statistics cited. In fact, not a single factual claim is being called “false”.
In short, Facebook is well aware that 90% of the article is perfectly provably true.
In fact, it’s not our article they’re allegedly fact-checking, it’s another article in the publication NewsPunch, which relies on one of the same sources we do.
The “fact-check” is entirely devoted to just one of three leaks we describe – the report from German Interior Ministry employee – and even then focuses solely on its provenance rather than its content.
In essence, what is being “fact-checked” is not the report itself, but where it came from.
Nowhere in this ‘rebuttal’ does it claim the ‘German Ministry employee’ was lying or making provably false statements. Neither does it challenge the credentials, competence or honesty of the “independent scientists” who co-authored the report.
Instead, it uses diversionary language claiming the document’s main author, Stephan Kohn, was simply sharing his “private opinion” and was not authorised to speak for the government.
The author of the document is Stephan Kohn, a politologist and employee of Germany’s Interior Ministry in the KM 4 department for the Protection of Critical Infrastructures.
However, Kohn’s analysis was not requested by the Interior Ministry, as the article claims.
On 10 May, Germany’s Interior Ministry issued a press release stating that the employee had disseminated his “private opinion on the corona crisis management” and that the “elaboration was carried out outside the area of responsibility as well as without assignment and authorization”.
This approach should be hauntingly familiar to anyone who has been following the OPCW whistleblower story.
Where expert witnesses contradicting the official narrative on Douma were claimed to merely be “disgruntled ex-employees” who were in Syria of their own accord and “never part of the fact-finding mission”.
All these claims have since been shown to be lies.
In addition to these irrelevant obfuscations, the article uses weasel words to construct a flimsy counter-argument:
According to EuroMOMO, the number of excess deaths coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic was twice the number that occurred during the unusually deadly flu seasons of 2017, 2018, and 2019 (Figure 1).
Note that they only back three years in time, and not all the way to 2000 or 1998, both of which had very similar excess death numbers.
Note also they say “coinciding with”, and not “caused by”.
This allows them to cite all the excess deaths in Europe, despite statistics showing that huge numbers the excess deaths were due to other causes – including the lockdown limiting access to healthcare and increasing poverty.
They are using excess deaths caused by the lockdown, to argue against the accuracy of a report warning that the lockdown will cause excess deaths.
It is going full Orwell. And it is utterly disgusting.
This article simply does not offer any justification for dismissing our article reporting Kohn’s words as ‘false information’.
The information is NOT demonstrably false, it is merely contentious, in that the data is open to multiple interpretations.
In fact, the article admits that itself – only able to label the claim as “misleading” or “unsupported”. Nowhere do they use the word “disinformation” or “misinformation” or “false information”. Not once.
And yet that is the label facebook has stuck on it.
Facebook is not suppressing this article because it contains false information at all, it is censoring it because it offers an interpretation of facts that does not support the current mainstream dogma.
This is censorship, pure and simple.
Source: Off-guardian.org
Here are the censorship-free social media accounts where you can find HumansAreFree.com:


humansarefree--2020-06-18--Globalists Just Revealed That The ‘Great Economic Reset’ Is Scheduled for 2021

For those not familiar with the phrase “ global economic reset ” , it is one that has been used ever increasingly by elitists in the central banking world for several years .
I first heard it referenced by Christine Lagarde , the head of the IMF at the time , in 2014 .
The reset is often mentioned in the same breath as ideas like “ the New Multilateralism ” or “ the Multipolar World Order ” or “ the New World Order ” .
All of these phrases mean essentially the same thing .
The reset is promoted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ crisis which was triggered in 2008 .
This same financial crash is still with us today , but now , after a decade of central bank money printing and debt creation , the bubble is even bigger than it was before .
As always , the central bank “ cure ” is far worse than the disease , and the renewed crash we face today is far more deadly than what would have happened in 2008 if we had simply taken our medicine and refused to prop up weak parts of the economy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ attribute the Fed ’ s habit of making things worse to “ hubris ” or “ ignorance ” .
They think the Fed actually wants to save the financial system or “ protect the golden goose ” , but this is not reality .
The truth is , the Fed is not a bumbling maintenance man , the Fed is a saboteur , a suicide bomber that is willing to destroy even itself as an institution in order to explode the US economy and clear the path for a new globally centralized one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Global Reset ” .
In 2015 in my article ‘ The Global Economic Reset Has Begun ’ , I stated : “ The global reset is not a “ response ” to the process of collapse we are trapped in today .
No , the global reset as implemented by central banks and the BIS/IMF is the cause of the collapse .
The collapse is a tool , a flamethrower burning a great hole in the forest to make way for the foundations of the globalist Ziggurat to be built….economic disaster serves the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we see the globalist plan coming to fruition , with the elites revealing what appears to be their intent to launch their reset in 2021 .
The World Economic Forum officially announced the Great Reset initiative as part of their Covid Action Platform last week , and a summit is scheduled in January 2021 to discuss their plans more openly with the world and the mainstream media .
The WEF also posted a rather bizarre video on the Reset , which consists of a series of images of the world falling apart ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ emission into the air which I suppose is meant to scare us with notions of global warming ) .
The destruction is then “ reset ” at the push of a button , with everything reversing back to a pristine human-less world of nature and the words “ Join Us ” .
The reset , according to discussions by the IMF , is basically the next stage in the formation of a one-world economic system and potential global government .
This seems to fall in line with the solutions offered during the Event @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a coronavirus pandemic that was held by the Bill And Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum only two months before the REAL THING happened at the beginning of 2020 .
Event 201 suggested that one of the top solutions to a pandemic would be the institution of a centralized global economic body that could handle the financial response to the coronavirus .
Is it not convenient that the events of the real coronavirus pandemic fall exactly in line with the Event 201 simulation , as well as directly in line with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the World Economic Forum ?
As they say , let no crisis go to waste , or , as is the motto of the globalists “ Order Out Of Chaos ” .
With civil unrest about to become a way of life for many parts of the world including the US , and the pandemic set for a resurgence of infections after the “ reopening ” , creating a rationale for a second wave of lockdowns probably in July , the economy as we know it is being destroyed .
The last @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a thin thread after the crash of 2008 , are now being cut .
The goal is rather obvious – Terrify the population with poverty , internal conflicts and a broken supply chain until they lobby the establishment for help .
Then , offer the “ solution ” of medical tyranny , immunity passports , martial law , a global economic system based on a cashless digital society in which privacy in trade is erased , and then slowly but surely form a faceless “ multilateral ” global government which answers to no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I remember back in 2014 when Christine Lagarde first began talking about the reset .
That same year she also made a very strange speech to the National Press Club in which she started rambling gleefully about numerology and the “ magic number 7 ” .
Many within the club laughed , as there was apparently an inside joke that the rest of us were not privy to .
Well , I would point out that the World Economic Forum meeting on the global reset in 2021 will be held exactly 7 years @ @ @ @ @ @ @ another interesting coincidence I suppose… The new world order , the global reset , is a long running scheme to centralize power , but in a way that is meant to be sustained for centuries to come .
The elites know that it is not enough to achieve global governance by force alone ; such an attempt would only lead to resistance and eternal rebellion .
No , what the elites want is for the public to ASK , even beg for global governance .
If the public is tricked into demanding it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the horrors of global chaos , then they are far less likely to rebel against it later .
The pandemic is not going away anytime soon .
Everyone should expect that state governments and the federal government will call for renewed lockdowns .
With these new lockdowns , the US economy in particular will be finished .
With 40 million people losing their jobs during the last lockdowns , many states only partially reopened , and only 13 % to 18 % of small businesses receiving bailout loans to survive , the next @ @ @ @ @ @ @ devastating wake-up call .
The real solution will be for people to form more self reliant communities free of the mainstream economy .
The real solution should be decentralization and independence , not centralization and slavery .
The globalists will seek to interfere with any effort to break from the program .
That said , they can do very little if millions of people enact localization efforts at the same time .
If people aren ’ t reliant on the system , then they can not be controlled by the system .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ collapse of the existing economy .
When stagflation spikes even harder than it is right now and prices of necessities double or triple yet again , and joblessness skyrockets even further , how many people will clamor for the globalist solution and how many will build their own systems ?
How many will be bowing in submission and how many will be ready to fight back ?
It is a question I still don ’ t have an answer to even after 14 years of analysis on the issue .
What I suspect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Not as many as we might hope for , but enough to defend the cause of liberty .
Maybe this is overly optimistic , but I believe the globalists are destined to lose this war in the long run .

For those not familiar with the phrase “global economic reset”, it is one that has been used ever increasingly by elitists in the central banking world for several years.
I first heard it referenced by Christine Lagarde, the head of the IMF at the time, in 2014. The reset is often mentioned in the same breath as ideas like “the New Multilateralism” or “the Multipolar World Order” or “the New World Order”. All of these phrases mean essentially the same thing.
The reset is promoted as a solution to the ongoing economic crisis which was triggered in 2008. This same financial crash is still with us today, but now, after a decade of central bank money printing and debt creation, the bubble is even bigger than it was before.
As always, the central bank “cure” is far worse than the disease, and the renewed crash we face today is far more deadly than what would have happened in 2008 if we had simply taken our medicine and refused to prop up weak parts of the economy artificially.
Many alternative economists often wrongly attribute the Fed’s habit of making things worse to “hubris” or “ignorance”. They think the Fed actually wants to save the financial system or “protect the golden goose”, but this is not reality.
The truth is, the Fed is not a bumbling maintenance man, the Fed is a saboteur, a suicide bomber that is willing to destroy even itself as an institution in order to explode the US economy and clear the path for a new globally centralized one world system. Hence, the “Global Reset”.
In 2015 in my article ‘The Global Economic Reset Has Begun’, I stated:
“The global reset is not a “response” to the process of collapse we are trapped in today. No, the global reset as implemented by central banks and the BIS/IMF is the cause of the collapse. The collapse is a tool, a flamethrower burning a great hole in the forest to make way for the foundations of the globalist Ziggurat to be built….economic disaster serves the interests of elitists.”
Now in 2020 we see the globalist plan coming to fruition, with the elites revealing what appears to be their intent to launch their reset in 2021. The World Economic Forum officially announced the Great Reset initiative as part of their Covid Action Platform last week, and a summit is scheduled in January 2021 to discuss their plans more openly with the world and the mainstream media.
The WEF also posted a rather bizarre video on the Reset, which consists of a series of images of the world falling apart (and images of factories releasing harmless carbon emission into the air which I suppose is meant to scare us with notions of global warming). The destruction is then “reset” at the push of a button, with everything reversing back to a pristine human-less world of nature and the words “Join Us”.
The reset, according to discussions by the IMF, is basically the next stage in the formation of a one-world economic system and potential global government. This seems to fall in line with the solutions offered during the Event 201 pandemic simulation; a simulation of a coronavirus pandemic that was held by the Bill And Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum only two months before the REAL THING happened at the beginning of 2020.
Event 201 suggested that one of the top solutions to a pandemic would be the institution of a centralized global economic body that could handle the financial response to the coronavirus.
Is it not convenient that the events of the real coronavirus pandemic fall exactly in line with the Event 201 simulation, as well as directly in line with the global reset plans of the IMF and the World Economic Forum?
As they say, let no crisis go to waste, or, as is the motto of the globalists “Order Out Of Chaos”.
With civil unrest about to become a way of life for many parts of the world including the US, and the pandemic set for a resurgence of infections after the “reopening”, creating a rationale for a second wave of lockdowns probably in July, the economy as we know it is being destroyed. The last vestiges of the system, hanging by a thin thread after the crash of 2008, are now being cut.
The goal is rather obvious – Terrify the population with poverty, internal conflicts and a broken supply chain until they lobby the establishment for help. Then, offer the “solution” of medical tyranny, immunity passports, martial law, a global economic system based on a cashless digital society in which privacy in trade is erased, and then slowly but surely form a faceless “multilateral” global government which answers to no one and does whatever it pleases.
I remember back in 2014 when Christine Lagarde first began talking about the reset. That same year she also made a very strange speech to the National Press Club in which she started rambling gleefully about numerology and the “magic number 7”.
Many within the club laughed, as there was apparently an inside joke that the rest of us were not privy to. Well, I would point out that the World Economic Forum meeting on the global reset in 2021 will be held exactly 7 years after Lagarde gave that speech. Just another interesting coincidence I suppose…
The new world order, the global reset, is a long running scheme to centralize power, but in a way that is meant to be sustained for centuries to come. The elites know that it is not enough to achieve global governance by force alone; such an attempt would only lead to resistance and eternal rebellion.
No, what the elites want is for the public to ASK, even beg for global governance. If the public is tricked into demanding it as a way to save them from the horrors of global chaos, then they are far less likely to rebel against it later.
Problem – reaction – solution.
The pandemic is not going away anytime soon. Everyone should expect that state governments and the federal government will call for renewed lockdowns. With these new lockdowns, the US economy in particular will be finished.
With 40 million people losing their jobs during the last lockdowns, many states only partially reopened, and only 13% to 18% of small businesses receiving bailout loans to survive, the next two months are going to be a devastating wake-up call.
The real solution will be for people to form more self reliant communities free of the mainstream economy. The real solution should be decentralization and independence, not centralization and slavery.
The globalists will seek to interfere with any effort to break from the program. That said, they can do very little if millions of people enact localization efforts at the same time. If people aren’t reliant on the system, then they cannot be controlled by the system.
The real test will come with the final collapse of the existing economy. When stagflation spikes even harder than it is right now and prices of necessities double or triple yet again, and joblessness skyrockets even further, how many people will clamor for the globalist solution and how many will build their own systems?
How many will be bowing in submission and how many will be ready to fight back? It is a question I still don’t have an answer to even after 14 years of analysis on the issue.
What I suspect is that many people will fight back. Not as many as we might hope for, but enough to defend the cause of liberty. Maybe this is overly optimistic, but I believe the globalists are destined to lose this war in the long run.
Reference: Alt-Market.com