humansarefree--2020-10-02--Gates & Kissinger Are On the Same Path to Population Control

“ The further a society drifts from the truth , the more it will hate those who speak it.
” – George Orwell Can we agree that there are two types of Covid-19 ?
The first type , is Covid-19 , ” The Virus ” , which is a fairly mild infection that most people don ’ t even realize they ’ ve contracted .
They remain either asymptomatic or have slight flu-like symptoms that go away after a week or so .
A tiny sliver of the population – that are mainly-older , vulnerable people with underlying health conditions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ill and die .
But , according to most analysis , the chances of dying from Covid are roughly between 1 in every 200 to 1 in every 1,000 people ( CDC-IFR- 0.26 % ) .
In other words , Covid is not the Spanish Flu , not the Black Plague and the Genocidal Planetary Killer Virus it was cracked up to be .
It kills more people than the annual influenza , but not significantly more .
The second type of Covid-19 , is Covid “ The Political Contrivance ” or , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 20 19 .
This iteration of the Covid phenom relates to the manner in which a modestly-lethal respiratory pathogen has been inflated into a perennial public health crisis in order to implement economic and societal changes that would otherwise be impossible .
This is the political side of Covid , which is much more difficult to define since it relates to the ambiguous agenda of powerful elites who are using the infection to conceal their real intentions .
Many critics believe that Covid is a vehicle the Davos Crowd is using to launch @ @ @ @ @ @ @ think it has more to do with Climate Change , that is , rather than build consensus among the world leaders for mandatory carbon reductions , global mandarins have simply imposed lockdowns that sharply reduce economic activity across-the-board .
This , in fact , has lowered emissions significantly , but at great cost to most of humanity .
Covid restrictions have triggered a sharp uptick in suicides , clinical depression , child abuse , domestic violence , alcoholism and drug abuse .
The list goes on and on .
Also , it has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ increasing unemployment and homelessness exponentially , while setting the stage for massive famines in undeveloped countries around the world .
Even so , key players in the Covid crisis – like mastermind Bill Gates – continue to marvel at impact these onerous restrictions have had on emissions .
Take a look at this excerpt from a recent post at the Microsoft founder ’ s blog : “ You may have seen projections that , because economic activity has slowed down so much , the world will emit fewer greenhouse gases this year than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ certainly true , their importance for the fight against climate change has been overstated .
Analysts disagree about how much emissions will go down this year , but the International Energy Agency puts the reduction around 8 percent .
In real terms , that means we will release the equivalent of around 47 billion tons of carbon , instead of 51 billion .
That ’ s a meaningful reduction , and we would be in great shape if we could continue that rate of decrease every year .
Unfortunately , we can ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ taking to achieve this 8 percent reduction .
More than 600,000 people have died , and tens of millions are out of work .
This April , car traffic was half what it was in April 2019 .
For months , air traffic virtually came to a halt .
To put it mildly , this is not a situation that anyone would want to continue .
And yet we are still on track to emit 92 percent as much carbon as we did last year .
What ’ s remarkable is not how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the pandemic , but how little .
In addition , these reductions are being achieved at , literally , the greatest possible cost .
To see why , let ’ s look at what it costs to avert a single ton of greenhouse gases .
This figure—the cost per ton of carbon averted—is a tool that economists use to compare the expense of different carbon-reduction strategies .
For example , if you have a technology that costs $ 1 million , and using it lets you avert the release of 10,000 tons of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 100 per ton of carbon averted .
In reality , $ 100 per ton would still be pretty expensive .
But many economists think this price reflects the true cost of greenhouse gases to society , and it also happens to be a memorable round number that makes a good benchmark for discussions .
Now let ’ s treat the shutdown caused by COVID-19 as if it were a carbon-reduction strategy .
Has closing off major parts of the economy avoided emissions at anything close to $ 100 per ton ?
No .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ data from the Rhodium Group , it comes to between $ 3,200 and $ 5,400 per ton .
In the European Union , it ’ s roughly the same amount .
In other words , the shutdown is reducing emissions at a cost between 32 and 54 times the $ 100 per ton that economists consider a reasonable price .
If you want to understand the kind of damage that climate change will inflict , look at COVID-19 and spread the pain out over a much longer period of time .
The loss @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this pandemic are on par with what will happen regularly if we do not eliminate the world ’ s carbon emissions.
” ( “ COVID-19 is awful .
Climate change could be worse “ , Gates Notes ) Isn ’ t it curious that Gates has spent so much time calculating the impact lockdowns have had on carbon emissions ?
And look at how precise his calculations are .
These are not “ back of the envelop ” type computations , but a serious bit of number-crunching .
He even takes the number @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worldwide ( 600,000 ) and painstakingly compares it to the projected “ global mortality rates ” ( “ on an annualized basis ” ) of people who will die from “ increases in global temperatures ” .
Does it seem to you that Gates might have more than a passing interest in these estimations ?
Does it look like he might be more than just a neutral observer impartially perusing the data ?
Let me pose a theory here : In my opinion , Gates ’ interest in these matters is not merely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ elites are conducting an elaborate science experiment in which we – mere mortals – are the lab rats .
They are deliberately using the Covid-scare to conceal their real objective which is to prove beyond a doubt that curtailing emissions by shutting down vast swathes of the global economy will NOT stave off catastrophic climate change .
So , let ’ s just assume for the sake of argument that I ’ m right .
Let ’ s assume that other elites read Gates report and agree with its conclusions .
Then what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , because Gates doesn ’ t really answer that question , but his silence gives him away .
Let me explain : Gates says , “ The relatively small decline in emissions this year makes one thing clear : We can not get to zero emissions simply — or even mostly — by flying and driving less.
” Okay , so we can not stop climate change by doing what we are doing now .
“ Let science and innovation lead the way… .
Any comprehensive response to climate change will have to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ ll need biology , chemistry , physics , political science , economics , engineering , and other sciences.
” Right again , we ’ ll follow the science .
Gates then says : “ It will take decades to develop and deploy all the clean-energy inventions we need.
” Okay , so we have to move fast to avoid tragedy .
“ Health advocates said for years that a pandemic was virtually inevitable .
The world did not do enough to prepare , and now we are trying to make up for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tale for climate change , and it points us toward a better approach.
” Got that ?
So , on the one hand , Gates is saying ‘ We must act fast and follow the science ’ , and on the other he is saying , ‘ Shutting down the economy alone isn ’ t going to work.
’ WTF ?
If it ’ s not going to work , then why bother ?
Why is Gates sending a mixed message ?
Ahh , but there ’ s the rub .
It ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is not a contradiction .
What Gates is doing is leading the reader to draw the same conclusion that he has , ( wink , wink ) that is , if reducing economic activity isn ’ t going to work , then we have to find an entirely different solution , like reducing the size of the population .
Isn ’ t that the only logical conclusion ?
Yes , it is .
So , the Great Lab Experiment of 2020 ( Covid ) has alot to do with population control ; thinning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can ensure their blue-blooded offspring will have mild temps when they winter-over on their private islands in the Caribbean .
But population control is just a small part of a much more ambitious plan to restructure the global economy , vaccinate everyone on the planet and dispose of those niggling civil liberties to which Americans have become so attached .
The elitist strategy has been dubbed the “ Great Reset ” which refers to the World Economic Forum ’ s Covid Action Platform , a program that aims at restructuring “ economic and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ best suits the interests of “ stakeholder ” capitalists .
“ COVID-19 lockdowns may be gradually easing , but anxiety about the world ’ s social and economic prospects is only intensifying .
“ There is good reason to worry : a sharp economic downturn has already begun , and we could be facing the worst depression since the 1930s .
But , while this outcome is likely , it is not unavoidable .
To achieve a better outcome , the world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ social contracts and working conditions .
Every country , from the United States to China , must participate , and every industry , from oil and gas to tech , must be transformed .
In short , we need a “ Great Reset ” of capitalism… The level of cooperation and ambition this implies is unprecedented .
But it is not some impossible dream .
In fact , one silver lining of the pandemic is that it has shown how quickly we can make radical changes to our lifestyles .
Almost instantly , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ abandon practices long claimed to be essential , from frequent air travel to working in an office… .
Clearly , the will to build a better society does exist .
We must use it to secure the Great Reset that we so badly need .
That will require stronger and more effective governments , though this does not imply an ideological push for bigger ones .
And it will demand private-sector engagement every step of the way.
” ( “ The World Economic Forum ’ s Covid Action Platform “ , WEF ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ want to remake society from the ground-up , it ’ s because that ’ s exactly what they have in mind .
And they ’ re not even trying to hide their real intentions .
They say quite bluntly : “ the world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies , from education to social contracts and working conditions.
” That sounds alot like marching orders to me and , indeed , that ’ s exactly what they are ; orders .
But how do they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ changes ?
Why Covid , of course .
They ’ re going to use Covid to make fundamental changes to the existing system , including accelerating privatization ( “ stakeholder capitalism ” ) , merging governments into a unified global regime , intensifying the elements of social control ( via mass electronic surveillance , intrusive contact tracing , security checkpoints , lockdowns , internal passports , biometric IDs etc ) and taking whatever steps are required to introduce a tyrannical Brave New World .
It ’ s all there in black and white @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to hide it .
In their own words , the “ Great Reset ” depends on the Covid Action Platform , right ?
In order to “ build a better society ” we need to “ make radical changes to our lifestyles ” including reductions in “ frequent air travel to working in an office ” .
So just forget that trip to Italy next year Mr. and Mrs. WorkerBee .
Ain ’ t gon na happen .
Bill Gates says , “ No.
” And get used to working from home , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ want your dog-eared Capri spewing carbon into our pristine-blue skies .
The statement also makes clear that the obliteration of millions of jobs and small businesses was not an accidental casualty of the Covid lockdowns , but the planned demolition of business and workers these Mucky-mucks consider ‘ non-essential ’ .
And as far as who will participate in this new blueprint for Capitalist Valhalla ?
Well , everyone of course .
According to the authors : “ Every country , from the United States to China , must participate , and every @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tech , must be transformed.
” There it is from the horse ’ s mouth : The glorious Biosecurity Slave State is emerging right before our very eyes and we just thought we were in another Great Depression rounded off with a pandemic .
So , when we talk about Covid the “ Political Contrivance ” , we ’ re actually referring to the vehicle that elites have settled on to transition the country from its present condition to a full-blown “ lock-down ” police state .
Covid is the smokescreen that ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of filthy-rich powerbrokers who want to implement their Grand Plan for humanity .
Rockefeller Foundation ’ s Operation Lockstep : ‘ Under The Guise Of A Pandemic , We Will Create A Prison State ’ So , if everything feels chaotic and upside-down at the present time , don ’ t be alarmed ; it ’ s all by design .
The more muddled and turbulent the world becomes , the easier it is to get people to submit to moronic activities like wearing a diaper on your mouth every time you leave @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the grocery store so invisible pathogens don ’ t climb up your pant-leg and bite you .
Psychologists know that –in a topsy-turvy world where uncertainty prevails — people are more apt to follow the directives of affable blockheads , like Tony Fauci , even though they may be abandoning their last-claim to personal freedom in the process .
Looking back to April of 2020 , we probably should have anticipated where all this was headed , after all , Mr. NWO himself , Henry Kissinger , announced what to expect in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Street Journal .
Here ’ s what he said : “ The reality is the world will never be the same after the coronavirus .
To argue now about the past only makes it harder to do what has to be done… ” ( NOTE – Is Kissinger clairvoyant ?
How did he know the “ world would never be the same again ” ? )
“ Enlightenment thinkers ( argued ) that the purpose of the legitimate state is to provide for the fundamental needs of the people… Individuals can not secure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The pandemic has prompted an anachronism , a revival of the walled city in an age when prosperity depends on global trade and movement of people.
” ( NOTE – In other words : Globalism is good , Nationalism is bad .
The same refrain we ’ ve heard for the last 30 years . )
While the assault on human health ( from Covid ) will—hopefully—be temporary , the political and economic upheaval it has unleashed could last for generations .
( NOTE– Another peek into Henry ’ s crystal ball , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even the U.S. , can in a purely national effort overcome the virus .
Addressing the necessities of the moment must ultimately be coupled with a global collaborative vision and program.
” ( “ The Coronavirus Pandemic Will Forever Alter the World Order ” , Wall Street Journal ) As Kissinger clearly states , globalization is still alive and well among the Davos heavyweights who now see a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to put their plan into action .
Parts of Australia and New Zealand are already under de-facto martial law while PM Boris Johnson @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to enforce his goofy Covid mandates .
Everywhere in the western world , freedom is collapsing faster than a corrugated lean-to in a Kansas tornado .
Meanwhile in panic-stricken America , fainthearted proles continue to hide behind their sofas waiting for the faux-plague to pass .
Do they even see the train-wreck just ahead ?
Author Gary D. Barnett summed it up like this : “ At this moment in time we are standing on a precipice with the state attempting to push us over the edge .
Once over that edge , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ This is why if the people fight back in mass , and withhold all support from the governing demons , we can awaken from this nightmare , and regain normalcy.
” ( “ The State ’ s Covid Response Is a Cancer for the Freedom of Humanity ” , Gary D. Barnett , Lew Rockwell ) Bravo , Mr. Barnett !
That says it all .

“The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.” – George Orwell
Can we agree that there are two types of Covid-19?
The first type, is Covid-19 ,”The Virus”, which is a fairly mild infection that most people don’t even realize they’ve contracted. They remain either asymptomatic or have slight flu-like symptoms that go away after a week or so.
A tiny sliver of the population – that are mainly-older, vulnerable people with underlying health conditions – can develop complications, become seriously ill and die.
But, according to most analysis, the chances of dying from Covid are roughly between 1 in every 200 to 1 in every 1,000 people (CDC-IFR- 0.26%).
In other words, Covid is not the Spanish Flu, not the Black Plague and the Genocidal Planetary Killer Virus it was cracked up to be.
It kills more people than the annual influenza, but not significantly more.
The second type of Covid-19, is Covid “The Political Contrivance” or, rather, CODENAME: Operation Virus Identification 20 19.
This iteration of the Covid phenom relates to the manner in which a modestly-lethal respiratory pathogen has been inflated into a perennial public health crisis in order to implement economic and societal changes that would otherwise be impossible.
This is the political side of Covid, which is much more difficult to define since it relates to the ambiguous agenda of powerful elites who are using the infection to conceal their real intentions.
Many critics believe that Covid is a vehicle the Davos Crowd is using to launch their authoritarian New World Order.
Others think it has more to do with Climate Change, that is, rather than build consensus among the world leaders for mandatory carbon reductions, global mandarins have simply imposed lockdowns that sharply reduce economic activity across-the-board.
This, in fact, has lowered emissions significantly, but at great cost to most of humanity. Covid restrictions have triggered a sharp uptick in suicides, clinical depression, child abuse, domestic violence, alcoholism and drug abuse.
The list goes on and on. Also, it has left economies everywhere in a shambles, increasing unemployment and homelessness exponentially, while setting the stage for massive famines in undeveloped countries around the world.
Even so, key players in the Covid crisis – like mastermind Billy Boy – continue to marvel at impact these onerous restrictions have had on emissions. Take a look at this excerpt from a recent post at the Microsoft founder’s blog:
“You may have seen projections that, because economic activity has slowed down so much, the world will emit fewer greenhouse gases this year than last year. Although these projections are certainly true, their importance for the fight against climate change has been overstated.
Analysts disagree about how much emissions will go down this year, but the International Energy Agency puts the reduction around 8 percent.
In real terms, that means we will release the equivalent of around 47 billion tons of carbon, instead of 51 billion.
That’s a meaningful reduction, and we would be in great shape if we could continue that rate of decrease every year. Unfortunately, we can’t.
Consider what it’s taking to achieve this 8 percent reduction. More than 600,000 people have died, and tens of millions are out of work.
This April, car traffic was half what it was in April 2019. For months, air traffic virtually came to a halt.
To put it mildly, this is not a situation that anyone would want to continue. And yet we are still on track to emit 92 percent as much carbon as we did last year.
What’s remarkable is not how much emissions will go down because of the pandemic, but how little.
In addition, these reductions are being achieved at, literally, the greatest possible cost.
To see why, let’s look at what it costs to avert a single ton of greenhouse gases. This figure—the cost per ton of carbon averted—is a tool that economists use to compare the expense of different carbon-reduction strategies.
For example, if you have a technology that costs $1 million, and using it lets you avert the release of 10,000 tons of gas, you’re paying $100 per ton of carbon averted.
In reality, $100 per ton would still be pretty expensive. But many economists think this price reflects the true cost of greenhouse gases to society, and it also happens to be a memorable round number that makes a good benchmark for discussions.
Now let’s treat the shutdown caused by COVID-19 as if it were a carbon-reduction strategy. Has closing off major parts of the economy avoided emissions at anything close to $100 per ton?
No. In the United States, according to data from the Rhodium Group, it comes to between $3,200 and $5,400 per ton. In the European Union, it’s roughly the same amount.
In other words, the shutdown is reducing emissions at a cost between 32 and 54 times the $100 per ton that economists consider a reasonable price.
If you want to understand the kind of damage that climate change will inflict, look at COVID-19 and spread the pain out over a much longer period of time.
The loss of life and economic misery caused by this pandemic are on par with what will happen regularly if we do not eliminate the world’s carbon emissions.” (“COVID-19 is awful. Climate change could be worse“, Gates Notes)
Isn’t it curious that Gates has spent so much time calculating the impact lockdowns have had on carbon emissions? And look at how precise his calculations are.
These are not “back of the envelop” type computations, but a serious bit of number-crunching.
He even takes the number of people who have died of Covid worldwide (600,000) and painstakingly compares it to the projected “global mortality rates” (“on an annualized basis”) of people who will die from “increases in global temperatures”.
Does it seem to you that Gates might have more than a passing interest in these estimations? Does it look like he might be more than just a neutral observer impartially perusing the data?
Let me pose a theory here: In my opinion, Gates’ interest in these matters is not merely speculative curiosity. He and his fellow elites are conducting an elaborate science experiment in which we – mere mortals – are the lab rats.
They are deliberately using the Covid-scare to conceal their real objective which is to prove beyond a doubt that curtailing emissions by shutting down vast swathes of the global economy will NOT stave off catastrophic climate change.
So, let’s just assume for the sake of argument that I’m right. Let’s assume that other elites read Gates report and agree with its conclusions. Then what?
This is where it gets interesting, because Gates doesn’t really answer that question, but his silence gives him away.
Let me explain: Gates says,
“The relatively small decline in emissions this year makes one thing clear: We cannot get to zero emissions simply — or even mostly — by flying and driving less.”
Okay, so we cannot stop climate change by doing what we are doing now.
Then Gates says:
“Let science and innovation lead the way…. Any comprehensive response to climate change will have to tap into many different disciplines…. we’ll need biology, chemistry, physics, political science, economics, engineering, and other sciences.”
Right again, we’ll follow the science.
Gates then says: “It will take decades to develop and deploy all the clean-energy inventions we need.”
Okay, so we have to move fast to avoid tragedy.
Finally, Gates says:
“Health advocates said for years that a pandemic was virtually inevitable. The world did not do enough to prepare, and now we are trying to make up for lost time. This is a cautionary tale for climate change, and it points us toward a better approach.”
Got that? So, on the one hand, Gates is saying ‘We must act fast and follow the science’, and on the other he is saying, ‘Shutting down the economy alone isn’t going to work.’
WTF? If it’s not going to work, then why bother? Why is Gates sending a mixed message?
Ahh, but there’s the rub. It’s not a mixed message and it is not a contradiction.
What Gates is doing is leading the reader to draw the same conclusion that he has, (wink, wink) that is, if reducing economic activity isn’t going to work, then we have to find an entirely different solution, like reducing the size of the population.
Isn’t that the only logical conclusion?
Yes, it is. So, the Great Lab Experiment of 2020 (Covid) has alot to do with population control; thinning the herd so our exalted Davos Overlords can ensure their blue-blooded offspring will have mild temps when they winter-over on their private islands in the Caribbean.
But population control is just a small part of a much more ambitious plan to restructure the global economy, vaccinate everyone on the planet and dispose of those niggling civil liberties to which Americans have become so attached.
The elitist strategy has been dubbed the “Great Reset” which refers to the World Economic Forum’s Covid Action Platform, a program that aims at restructuring “economic and social foundations” in a way that best suits the interests of “stakeholder” capitalists.
Here’s a clip from their press release:
“COVID-19 lockdowns may be gradually easing, but anxiety about the world’s social and economic prospects is only intensifying.
“There is good reason to worry: a sharp economic downturn has already begun, and we could be facing the worst depression since the 1930s. But, while this outcome is likely, it is not unavoidable.
To achieve a better outcome, the world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions.
Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a “Great Reset” of capitalism…
The level of cooperation and ambition this implies is unprecedented. But it is not some impossible dream.
In fact, one silver lining of the pandemic is that it has shown how quickly we can make radical changes to our lifestyles.
Almost instantly, the crisis forced businesses and individuals to abandon practices long claimed to be essential, from frequent air travel to working in an office….
Clearly, the will to build a better society does exist. We must use it to secure the Great Reset that we so badly need.
That will require stronger and more effective governments, though this does not imply an ideological push for bigger ones.
And it will demand private-sector engagement every step of the way.” (“The World Economic Forum’s Covid Action Platform“, WEF)
If it sounds like our illustrious leaders want to remake society from the ground-up, it’s because that’s exactly what they have in mind. And they’re not even trying to hide their real intentions.
They say quite bluntly: “the world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions.”
That sounds alot like marching orders to me and, indeed, that’s exactly what they are; orders.
But how do they intend to affect these dramatic and revolutionary changes?
Why Covid, of course.
They’re going to use Covid to make fundamental changes to the existing system, including accelerating privatization (“stakeholder capitalism”), merging governments into a unified global regime, intensifying the elements of social control (via mass electronic surveillance, intrusive contact tracing, security checkpoints, lockdowns, internal passports, biometric IDs etc) and taking whatever steps are required to introduce a tyrannical Brave New World.
It’s all there in black and white, they’re not even trying to hide it. In their own words, the “Great Reset” depends on the Covid Action Platform, right?
In order to “build a better society” we need to “make radical changes to our lifestyles” including reductions in “frequent air travel to working in an office”.
So just forget that trip to Italy next year Mr. and Mrs. WorkerBee. Ain’t gonna happen. Billy Boy says, “No.”
And get used to working from home, too, because we don’t want your dog-eared Capri spewing carbon into our pristine-blue skies.
The statement also makes clear that the obliteration of millions of jobs and small businesses was not an accidental casualty of the Covid lockdowns, but the planned demolition of business and workers these Mucky-mucks consider ‘non-essential’.
And as far as who will participate in this new blueprint for Capitalist Valhalla? Well, everyone of course.
According to the authors:
“Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed.”
There it is from the horse’s mouth: The glorious Biosecurity Slave State is emerging right before our very eyes and we just thought we were in another Great Depression rounded off with a pandemic.
So, when we talk about Covid the “Political Contrivance”, we’re actually referring to the vehicle that elites have settled on to transition the country from its present condition to a full-blown “lock-down” police state.
Covid is the smokescreen that’s being used to conceal the maneuverings of filthy-rich powerbrokers who want to implement their Grand Plan for humanity.
Rockefeller Foundation’s Operation Lockstep: ‘Under The Guise Of A Pandemic, We Will Create A Prison State’
So, if everything feels chaotic and upside-down at the present time, don’t be alarmed; it’s all by design.
The more muddled and turbulent the world becomes, the easier it is to get people to submit to moronic activities like wearing a diaper on your mouth every time you leave the house or standing 6 feet apart at the grocery store so invisible pathogens don’t climb up your pant-leg and bite you.
Psychologists know that –in a topsy-turvy world where uncertainty prevails — people are more apt to follow the directives of affable blockheads, like Tony Fauci, even though they may be abandoning their last-claim to personal freedom in the process.
Looking back to April of 2020, we probably should have anticipated where all this was headed, after all, Mr. NWO himself, Henry Kissinger, announced what to expect in an op-ed he posted in the Wall Street Journal. Here’s what he said:
“The reality is the world will never be the same after the coronavirus. To argue now about the past only makes it harder to do what has to be done…” (NOTE – Is Kissinger clairvoyant? How did he know the “world would never be the same again”?)
“Enlightenment thinkers (argued) that the purpose of the legitimate state is to provide for the fundamental needs of the people… Individuals cannot secure these things on their own.
“The pandemic has prompted an anachronism, a revival of the walled city in an age when prosperity depends on global trade and movement of people.” (NOTE – In other words: Globalism is good, Nationalism is bad. The same refrain we’ve heard for the last 30 years.)
While the assault on human health (from Covid) will—hopefully—be temporary, the political and economic upheaval it has unleashed could last for generations. (NOTE– Another peek into Henry’s crystal ball, eh?)
No country, not even the U.S., can in a purely national effort overcome the virus. Addressing the necessities of the moment must ultimately be coupled with a global collaborative vision and program.” (“The Coronavirus Pandemic Will Forever Alter the World Order”, Wall Street Journal)
As Kissinger clearly states, globalization is still alive and well among the Davos heavyweights who now see a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to put their plan into action.
Parts of Australia and New Zealand are already under de-facto martial law while PM Boris Johnson is adding another 2,000 cops in London to enforce his goofy Covid mandates.
Everywhere in the western world, freedom is collapsing faster than a corrugated lean-to in a Kansas tornado.
Meanwhile in panic-stricken America, fainthearted proles continue to hide behind their sofas waiting for the faux-plague to pass.
Do they even see the train-wreck just ahead?
Author Gary D. Barnett summed it up like this:
“At this moment in time we are standing on a precipice with the state attempting to push us over the edge. Once over that edge, there will be no coming back.
“This is why if the people fight back in mass, and withhold all support from the governing demons, we can awaken from this nightmare, and regain normalcy.” (“The State’s Covid Response Is a Cancer for the Freedom of Humanity”, Gary D. Barnett, Lew Rockwell)
Bravo, Mr. Barnett! That says it all.
By Mike Whitney, Guest writer


humansarefree--2020-10-02--Former Top Level Executive at Facebook: ‘150 Men Rule the World’ & Everyone Else is a ‘Puppet’

“ Here ’ s the thing , there ’ s about 150 people that rule the world .
Anyone that wants to go into politics they ’ re all f*cken puppets , okay ?
There are 150 — and they ’ re all men — that run the world .
Period .
Fullstop .
“ They control most of the important assets — they control the money flows .
And these are not the tech entrepreneurs .
Now , they are going to get rolled over , over the next 5-10 years by the people that are really underneath pulling @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Nov 10 , 2017 , Stanford Graduate School of Business Some of you may remember Chamath Palihapitiya from his warning that social media was “ ripping apart the social fabric of how society works , ” which received generous attention in the media and went viral as a result .
What most people completely missed , and what no single major media outlet reported — at least to the best of my knowledge — was when he explained that “ 150 men rule the world ” and they are “ going to roll @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coming years .
Censorship Has Since Grown To Unprecedented Levels Within just a few months of these unambiguous claims , a series of controversial laws from different governments were either proposed or passed , that would impose harsh penalties and fines on tech companies that did not censor postings considered to be “ harmful ” or “ dangerous ” by the authorities .
In Germany , for example , the government passed a law that would fine social media sites up to £44 million if they did not remove whatever they decided qualified @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hours .
Similarly , the European Union proposed that “ terrorist ” content be taken down within an hour or face harsh penalties .
Repeat offenders could be sanctioned by up to 4 % of their global turnover , which amounts to billions and billions of dollars .
As we all presumably know by now , censorship has since grown to unprecedented levels .
I myself have had my YouTube and Facebook accounts deleted , as has the Free Thought Project , amongst many others who have been accused of “ inauthentic activity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ then more recently , in the face of this current pandemic , censorship of information has become even more brazen , to the point of even targeting respected experts , such as Knut Wittkowski and many , many others , for challenging the lockdown policies being imposed .
In all instances the authorities claim that this is for the public ’ s safety and protection .
Whether this censorship is the result of the “ 150 men that rule the world ” or not , is something that we can only speculate about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ practically nil .
Considering his wealth and position in society , and also his frankness and authenticity of expression , however , Chamath Palihapiti ’ s claims should not be taken lightly .
They Don ’ t Give a Sh*t About What You Think of Their World View Later on in the interview , Chamath proceeds to explain how this ruling class actively use their money and wealth to propagate their own worldview to their personal benefit and self interest , and whether we like it or not , “ they don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ think of their worldview , ” they are going to use their enormous power and influence to propagate it nonetheless .
Being as such , “ you have a moral imperative to make sure that if you have a point of view that matters ” you make money that will help you influence public perception in a positive way .
Of course , this is much easier said than done , especially since many of those most familiar with the injustices of this world tend to be the ones that come from financial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ becomes all the more difficult when activists who have worked sedulously to build large followings that they could then use to help support their visions and plans to create positive change are censored or have their accounts entirely deleted .
Nonetheless , as Chamath points out , money ( and more so those who control it ) “ drives the world , for better or for worse ” .
There Is Another Way My personal position is that we are far more likely to change this toxic system for the better , if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ capabilities and resources to accomplish that goal .
No one person can accomplish this daunting task alone for obvious reasons .
None of us have all the knowledge , financial resources , and so on and so forth needed to create authentic positive change .
But if a decent number of us stand together , then we can aggregate everything that we need .
Someone might have the money to purchase a new piece of land , for example , another the knowledge to farm it , another the insight to build sustainable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ new schools for children , another the skills to protect the community physically from those who potentially mean to do harm , and so on and so forth .
Everything needed is already out there but we must stand together if we are to have a chance .
In order to still keep the hope of creating a better future alive though , the best and most immediate course of action we can take is to migrate to platforms where we can still at least communicate freely , such as : Minds.com , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Flote.app , and Bitchute , amongst others .
When we consider that there are people out there being arrested for simply making social media posts protesting these lockdowns , then we should know that this censorship is only going to get worse unfortunately , and potentially escalate to much more dangerous authoritarian levels .
Thus it is imperative that we start our exodus away from these tech companies under the control of the ruling class sooner rather than later .

“Here’s the thing, there’s about 150 people that rule the world. Anyone that wants to go into politics they’re all f*cken puppets, okay? There are 150 — and they’re all men — that run the world. Period. Fullstop.
“They control most of the important assets — they control the money flows. And these are not the tech entrepreneurs. Now, they are going to get rolled over, over the next 5-10 years by the people that are really underneath pulling the strings.” — Chamath Palihapitiya, Nov 10, 2017, Stanford Graduate School of Business
Some of you may remember Chamath Palihapitiya from his warning that social media was “ripping apart the social fabric of how society works,” which received generous attention in the media and went viral as a result.
What most people completely missed, and what no single major media outlet reported — at least to the best of my knowledge — was when he explained that “150 men rule the world” and they are “going to roll over” the tech entrepreneurs in the coming years.
Censorship Has Since Grown To Unprecedented Levels
Within just a few months of these unambiguous claims, a series of controversial laws from different governments were either proposed or passed, that would impose harsh penalties and fines on tech companies that did not censor postings considered to be “harmful” or “dangerous” by the authorities.
In Germany, for example, the government passed a law that would fine social media sites up to £44 million if they did not remove whatever they decided qualified as “hate speech” within 24 hours.
Similarly, the European Union proposed that “terrorist” content be taken down within an hour or face harsh penalties. Repeat offenders could be sanctioned by up to 4% of their global turnover, which amounts to billions and billions of dollars.
As we all presumably know by now, censorship has since grown to unprecedented levels.
I myself have had my YouTube and Facebook accounts deleted, as has the Free Thought Project, amongst many others who have been accused of “inauthentic activity” or something equally ambiguous.
And then more recently, in the face of this current pandemic, censorship of information has become even more brazen, to the point of even targeting respected experts, such as Knut Wittkowski and many, many others, for challenging the lockdown policies being imposed.
In all instances the authorities claim that this is for the public’s safety and protection.
Whether this censorship is the result of the “150 men that rule the world” or not, is something that we can only speculate about since the likelihood of an admission is practically nil.
Considering his wealth and position in society, and also his frankness and authenticity of expression, however, Chamath Palihapiti’s claims should not be taken lightly.
They Don’t Give a Sh*t About What You Think of Their World View
Later on in the interview, Chamath proceeds to explain how this ruling class actively use their money and wealth to propagate their own worldview to their personal benefit and self interest, and whether we like it or not, “they don’t give a sh*t about what you think of their worldview,” they are going to use their enormous power and influence to propagate it nonetheless.
Being as such, “you have a moral imperative to make sure that if you have a point of view that matters” you make money that will help you influence public perception in a positive way.
Of course, this is much easier said than done, especially since many of those most familiar with the injustices of this world tend to be the ones that come from financial scarcity and material poverty. It also becomes all the more difficult when activists who have worked sedulously to build large followings that they could then use to help support their visions and plans to create positive change are censored or have their accounts entirely deleted.
Nonetheless, as Chamath points out, money (and more so those who control it) “drives the world, for better or for worse”.
There Is Another Way
My personal position is that we are far more likely to change this toxic system for the better, if we stand together and aggregate our collective capabilities and resources to accomplish that goal.
No one person can accomplish this daunting task alone for obvious reasons. None of us have all the knowledge, financial resources, and so on and so forth needed to create authentic positive change. But if a decent number of us stand together, then we can aggregate everything that we need.
Someone might have the money to purchase a new piece of land, for example, another the knowledge to farm it, another the insight to build sustainable homes, another the knowledge to start new schools for children, another the skills to protect the community physically from those who potentially mean to do harm, and so on and so forth. Everything needed is already out there but we must stand together if we are to have a chance.
In order to still keep the hope of creating a better future alive though, the best and most immediate course of action we can take is to migrate to platforms where we can still at least communicate freely, such as:
Minds.com,
Brighteon.social,
MeWe.com,
Gab.com,
Sociall,
Flote.app,
and Bitchute, amongst others.
When we consider that there are people out there being arrested for simply making social media posts protesting these lockdowns, then we should know that this censorship is only going to get worse unfortunately, and potentially escalate to much more dangerous authoritarian levels.
Thus it is imperative that we start our exodus away from these tech companies under the control of the ruling class sooner rather than later.
Source: Thefreethoughtproject.com


humansarefree--2020-10-02--CNN Says We’re NEVER ‘Getting Back to Normal’

CNN has published an article asserting that people need to accept that things are never “ getting back to normal ” and that mandatory coronavirus restrictions such as wearing face masks will become “ permanent ” .
In a piece titled ‘ There is no getting ‘ back to normal , ’ experts say .
The sooner we accept that , the better ’ – CNN international security editor Nick Paton Walsh writes , “ Things are most likely never going “ back to normal.
” Walsh says that the pre-corona world is now mere nostalgia and that the public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it.
” Along with other social distancing measures , Walsh says that the mandatory wearing of masks will become “ permanent ” and “ just part of life.
” In other words , “ now we have the power , we ’ re not giving it back.
” Citing comments by Thomas Davenport , professor of information technology and management at Babson College in Wellesley , Massachusetts , Walsh says that , “ Those who refuse to wear masks may be guilty of normalcy bias , since they perceive this intrusion into lives @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t need to embrace.
” CNN also previously published an article which argued that wearing face masks is going to become as taboo as drink driving , despite innumerable experts across the world having warned that face masks are largely pointless from the perspective of preventing the spread of coronavirus .
Of course , this was all so predictable from the very start .
Dystopian authors throughout history warned that face masks were a way to further atomize and force conformity on a population whose identity and individuality is increasingly being erased .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the multitude of restrictions on our liberties and right to travel were just a necessary “ temporary ” measure in order to get back to normal .
Now we ’ re being told that this is the “ new normal.
” Now we ’ re being told that coronavirus hysteria will never end .
Mandated face masks , a cashless society , mandatory vaccines to travel and a Chinese-style social credit score system linked to corona apps .
Unless larger numbers of people start to resist this “ new normal , ” we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that is never coming off .

CNN has published an article asserting that people need to accept that things are never “getting back to normal” and that mandatory coronavirus restrictions such as wearing face masks will become “permanent”.
In a piece titled ‘There is no getting ‘back to normal,’ experts say. The sooner we accept that, the better’ – CNN international security editor Nick Paton Walsh writes, “Things are most likely never going “back to normal.”
Walsh says that the pre-corona world is now mere nostalgia and that the public needs to “come to terms with it.”
Along with other social distancing measures, Walsh says that the mandatory wearing of masks will become “permanent” and “just part of life.”
In other words, “now we have the power, we’re not giving it back.”
Citing comments by Thomas Davenport, professor of information technology and management at Babson College in Wellesley, Massachusetts, Walsh says that,
“Those who refuse to wear masks may be guilty of normalcy bias, since they perceive this intrusion into lives as a passing fad they don’t need to embrace.”
CNN also previously published an article which argued that wearing face masks is going to become as taboo as drink driving, despite innumerable experts across the world having warned that face masks are largely pointless from the perspective of preventing the spread of coronavirus.
Of course, this was all so predictable from the very start.
Dystopian authors throughout history warned that face masks were a way to further atomize and force conformity on a population whose identity and individuality is increasingly being erased.
At first, we were told that the multitude of restrictions on our liberties and right to travel were just a necessary “temporary” measure in order to get back to normal.
Now we’re being told that this is the “new normal.” Now we’re being told that coronavirus hysteria will never end.
Mandated face masks, a cashless society, mandatory jjabs to travel and a Chinese-style social credit score system linked to corona apps.
Unless larger numbers of people start to resist this “new normal,” we’ve been put in a straightjacket that is never coming off.
Source: Summit.news


humansarefree--2020-10-03--Michigan State Police Rescue 25 Missing Children

Michigan State Police rescued over two dozen missing children as part of an investigative operation last week , law enforcement officials said Wednesday .
Michigan State Police , with assistance from the Special Investigation Division Fraud Unit , located 25 missing children from Wayne , Oakland and Macomb counties in Operation MISafeKid II .
The sweep is part of a strategic plan launched by the MSP Second District to prioritize locating at-risk youth and missing children , MSP wrote in a Twitter post Wednesday .
Troops tracked down background names , photos and last known locations to locate the youth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Marshals ( USMS ) announced the recovery of 11 children as part of a two-month rescue effort in New Orleans , Louisiana , on Wednesday .
U.S .
Marshal Scott Illing said in a statement : This is a very important mission that the USMS has been tasked by Congress to oversee , as the safety of children across the country is paramount to this nation ’ s future .
While 11 recoveries may not seem high , this work , which is time consuming , was accomplished while also running our normal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ offender fugitive operations in the district , along with our other judicial missions .
In August , U.S .
Marshals said law enforcement recovered 39 minors as part of “ Operation Not Forgotten , ” the agency ’ s program focused on missing children .
The two-week mission conducted in Atlanta and Macon resulted in the recovery of 26 children and 13 more being safely located .
“ I can not say enough about Operation Not Forgotten and the men and women behind it , ” Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr said of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 39 – That ’ s how many young lives are getting a new start , and that ’ s how we measure success .
”

Michigan State Police rescued over two dozen missing children as part of an investigative operation last week, law enforcement officials said Wednesday.
WXYZ reports:
Michigan State Police, with assistance from the Special Investigation Division Fraud Unit, located 25 missing children from Wayne, Oakland and Macomb counties in Operation MISafeKid II.
The sweep is part of a strategic plan launched by the MSP Second District to prioritize locating at-risk youth and missing children, MSP wrote in a Twitter post Wednesday.
Troops tracked down background names, photos and last known locations to locate the youth.
The development came as U.S. Marshals (USMS) announced the recovery of 11 children as part of a two-month rescue effort in New Orleans, Louisiana, on Wednesday.
U.S. Marshal Scott Illing said in a statement:
This is a very important mission that the USMS has been tasked by Congress to oversee, as the safety of children across the country is paramount to this nation’s future.
While 11 recoveries may not seem high, this work, which is time consuming, was accomplished while also running our normal day-to-day violent felony offender investigations and sex offender fugitive operations in the district, along with our other judicial missions.
In August, U.S. Marshals said law enforcement recovered 39 minors as part of “Operation Not Forgotten,” the agency’s program focused on missing children.
The two-week mission conducted in Atlanta and Macon resulted in the recovery of 26 children and 13 more being safely located.
“I cannot say enough about Operation Not Forgotten and the men and women behind it,” Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr said of the mission at the time. “39 – That’s how many young lives are getting a new start, and that’s how we measure success.”
Sources: Breitbart.com; WXYZ.com


humansarefree--2020-10-03--Kate Winslet: ‘What The F**k Was I Doing Working With Woody Allen And Roman Polanski?’

Academy Award-winning actress Kate Winslet now regrets having worked for Roman Polanski and Woody Allen in the past .
Speaking with Vanity Fair , Winslet said that she wants to be a “ decent example to younger women ” and could not understand her mindset at the time she filmed with the two directors .
She starred in Polanski ’ s “ Carnage ” in 2011 and Allen ’ s “ Wonder Wheel ” in 2017 .
“ It ’ s like , what the f**k was I doing working with Woody Allen and Roman Polanski ?
” she said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ me now how those men were held in such high regard , so widely in the film industry and for as long as they were .
It ’ s f**king disgraceful.
” “ I can ’ t turn back the clock , ” she added .
“ I ’ m grappling with those regrets but what do we have if we aren ’ t able to just be f**king truthful about all of it ?
” Since 1993 , Dylan Farrow has maintained that Woody Allen sexually molested her while he dated her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ When I was seven years old , Woody Allen took me by the hand and led me into a dim , closet-like attic on the second floor of our house .
He told me to lay on my stomach and play with my brother ’ s electric train set , ” Allen ’ s daughter , Dylan Farrow , claims .
“ Then he sexually assaulted me.
” “ He talked to me while he did it , whispering that I was a good girl , that this was our secret , promising @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and I ’ d be a star in his movies .
I remember staring at that toy train , focusing on it as it traveled in its circle around the attic .
To this day , I find it difficult to look at toy trains .
“ For as long as I could remember , my father had been doing things to me that I didn ’ t like .
I didn ’ t like how often he would take me away from my mom , siblings and friends to be alone with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it when he would stick his thumb in my mouth .
I didn ’ t like it when I had to get in bed with him under the sheets when he was in his underwear .
I didn ’ t like it when he would place his head in my naked lap and breathe in and breathe out .
“ I would hide under beds or lock myself in the bathroom to avoid these encounters , but he always found me.
” Farrow took her father to court for it , but she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The judges , though , ruled that “ the best interests of these children would be served by remaining together in the custody of Ms. Farrow ” instead of Allen .
He even forbid Allen from visiting his children .
It does not help Allen ’ s case that he married his adoptive stepdaughter .
Nor does it help that his own son , Ronan Farrow , also thinks he did it .
“ I believe my sister , ” Ronan said .
He was not there to see it happen , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ claimed .
Woody Allen , both children agree , would climb into Dylan ’ s bed at night and force her to suck his thumb . ]
– Read more here .
Allen has emphatically denied the accusation , claiming that Mia coached Dylan as part of a vicious custody dispute .
The charges were ultimately dismissed by authorities and Moses Farrow , Dylan ’ s brother , has defended Allen ’ s innocence while asserting that Mia was the abusive one .
Roman Polanski previously admitted to sexually abusing 13-year-old Samantha Geimer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
He drugged and sodomized her during a photoshoot at Jack Nicholson ’ s house in 1977 .
During the height of the # MeToo movement , as many as five women came forward to accuse Roman Polanski of sexually assaulting them when they were teenagers .
[ As far as I know , at least 10 Women Accused Convicted Child Rapist Roman Polanski of Raping Them When They Were 9-16 Years Old . ]
In 2017 , upon the release of Allen ’ s “ Wonder Wheel , ” Kate Winslet told @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not fully comment on the allegations of sexual abuse against the director , adding that she had an “ extraordinary working experience ” with both Allen and Polanski .
“ I didn ’ t know Woody and I don ’ t know anything about that family .
As the actor in the film , you just have to step away and say , I don ’ t know anything , really , and whether any of it is true or false , ” she said , as reported by Fox News .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ put it to one side and just work with the person .
Woody Allen is an incredible director .
So is Roman Polanski .
I had an extraordinary working experience with both of those men , and that ’ s the truth.
” In 2018 , when giving her acceptance speech for the London Critics ’ Circle film award , Winslet expressed regret for her “ poor decisions ” to work with such men .
“ As women around the world and from all walks of life marched last weekend , I realized @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to stand here this evening and keep to myself some bitter regrets that I have about poor decisions to work with individuals with whom I wish I had not , ” the “ Titanic ” actress said .
“ It has become clear to me that by not saying anything , I might be adding to the anguish of many courageous women and men.
” “ There are directors , producers , and men of power who have for decades been awarded and applauded for their highly regarded work by both this industry @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

Academy Award-winning actress Kate Winslet now regrets having worked for Roman Polanski and Woody Allen in the past.
Speaking with Vanity Fair, Winslet said that she wants to be a “decent example to younger women” and could not understand her mindset at the time she filmed with the two directors. She starred in Polanski’s “Carnage” in 2011 and Allen’s “Wonder Wheel” in 2017.
“It’s like, what the f**k was I doing working with Woody Allen and Roman Polanski?” she said. “It’s unbelievable to me now how those men were held in such high regard, so widely in the film industry and for as long as they were. It’s f**king disgraceful.”
“I can’t turn back the clock,” she added. “I’m grappling with those regrets but what do we have if we aren’t able to just be f**king truthful about all of it?”
Since 1993, Dylan Farrow has maintained that Woody Allen sexually molested her while he dated her mother, Mia Farrow.
[“When I was seven years old, Woody Allen took me by the hand and led me into a dim, closet-like attic on the second floor of our house. He told me to lay on my stomach and play with my brother’s electric train set,” Allen’s daughter, Dylan Farrow, claims. “Then he sexually assaulted me.”
“He talked to me while he did it, whispering that I was a good girl, that this was our secret, promising that we’d go to Paris and I’d be a star in his movies. I remember staring at that toy train, focusing on it as it traveled in its circle around the attic. To this day, I find it difficult to look at toy trains.
“For as long as I could remember, my father had been doing things to me that I didn’t like. I didn’t like how often he would take me away from my mom, siblings and friends to be alone with him. I didn’t like it when he would stick his thumb in my mouth. I didn’t like it when I had to get in bed with him under the sheets when he was in his underwear. I didn’t like it when he would place his head in my naked lap and breathe in and breathe out.
“I would hide under beds or lock myself in the bathroom to avoid these encounters, but he always found me.”
Farrow took her father to court for it, but she was not able to prove it. The judges, though, ruled that “the best interests of these children would be served by remaining together in the custody of Ms. Farrow” instead of Allen. He even forbid Allen from visiting his children.
It does not help Allen’s case that he married his adoptive stepdaughter. Nor does it help that his own son, Ronan Farrow, also thinks he did it. “I believe my sister,” Ronan said.
He was not there to see it happen, but he confirmed something else his sister had claimed. Woody Allen, both children agree, would climb into Dylan’s bed at night and force her to suck his thumb.] – Read more here.
Allen has emphatically denied the accusation, claiming that Mia coached Dylan as part of a vicious custody dispute. The charges were ultimately dismissed by authorities and Moses Farrow, Dylan’s brother, has defended Allen’s innocence while asserting that Mia was the abusive one.
Roman Polanski previously admitted to sexually abusing 13-year-old Samantha Geimer before fleeing to Europe in the late-70s. He drugged and sodomized her during a photoshoot at Jack Nicholson’s house in 1977. During the height of the #MeToo movement, as many as five women came forward to accuse Roman Polanski of sexually assaulting them when they were teenagers.
[As far as I know, at least 10 Women Accused Convicted Child Rapist Roman Polanski of Raping Them When They Were 9-16 Years Old.]
In 2017, upon the release of Allen’s “Wonder Wheel,” Kate Winslet told The New York Times that she could not fully comment on the allegations of sexual abuse against the director, adding that she had an “extraordinary working experience” with both Allen and Polanski.
“I didn’t know Woody and I don’t know anything about that family. As the actor in the film, you just have to step away and say, I don’t know anything, really, and whether any of it is true or false,” she said, as reported by Fox News.
“Having thought it all through, you put it to one side and just work with the person. Woody Allen is an incredible director. So is Roman Polanski. I had an extraordinary working experience with both of those men, and that’s the truth.”
In 2018, when giving her acceptance speech for the London Critics’ Circle film award, Winslet expressed regret for her “poor decisions” to work with such men.
“As women around the world and from all walks of life marched last weekend, I realized that I wouldn’t be able to stand here this evening and keep to myself some bitter regrets that I have about poor decisions to work with individuals with whom I wish I had not,” the “Titanic” actress said.
“It has become clear to me that by not saying anything, I might be adding to the anguish of many courageous women and men.”
“There are directors, producers, and men of power who have for decades been awarded and applauded for their highly regarded work by both this industry and moviegoers alike,” she continued.
Source: DailyWire.com


humansarefree--2020-10-03--Urgent: Anti-speech Bill ‘EARN IT’ Introduced in House of Representatives

The dangerous EARN IT Act passed the Senate Judiciary Committee last month , and now it ’ s been introduced in the House of Representatives .
Click HERE to Take Action : Tell Congress to Reject the Earn It Act We need your help to stop this anti-speech , anti-security bill .
Email your elected officials in both chambers of Congress today and ask them to publicly oppose the EARN IT Act .
The EARN IT Act would allow all 50 state legislatures , as well as U.S. territories and Washington D.C. , to pass laws that would regulate the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Communications Decency Act , the EARN IT bill would allow small website owners to be sued or prosecuted under state laws , as long as the prosecution or lawsuit somehow related to crimes against children .
We know how websites will react to this .
Once they face prosecution or lawsuits based on other peoples ’ speech , they ’ ll monitor their users , and censor or shut down discussion forums .
The bill also creates an advisory commission on Internet “ best practices ” that will be dominated by Attorney @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Barr ’ s view on Internet “ best practices ” is well known — he wants to break encryption and let police read every message sent online .
Public outcry has already forced amendments into the EARN IT Act that purport to defend encryption — but they ’ re full of loopholes .
That window dressing doesn ’ t fix the bill ’ s many flaws .
Click HERE to Take Action : Tell Congress to Reject the Earn It Act

The dangerous EARN IT Act passed the Senate Judiciary Committee last month, and now it’s been introduced in the House of Representatives.
We need your help to stop this anti-speech, anti-security bill. Email your elected officials in both chambers of Congress today and ask them to publicly oppose the EARN IT Act.
The EARN IT Act would allow all 50 state legislatures, as well as U.S. territories and Washington D.C., to pass laws that would regulate the Internet.
By breaking Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, the EARN IT bill would allow small website owners to be sued or prosecuted under state laws, as long as the prosecution or lawsuit somehow related to crimes against children.
We know how websites will react to this. Once they face prosecution or lawsuits based on other peoples’ speech, they’ll monitor their users, and censor or shut down discussion forums.
The bill also creates an advisory commission on Internet “best practices” that will be dominated by Attorney General William Barr and law enforcement agencies.
Barr’s view on Internet “best practices” is well known — he wants to break encryption and let police read every message sent online.
Public outcry has already forced amendments into the EARN IT Act that purport to defend encryption — but they’re full of loopholes. That window dressing doesn’t fix the bill’s many flaws.
Source: EFF.org


humansarefree--2020-10-03--DOJ Charges Hundreds of Doctors & Nurses in Massive $6 Billion ‘Healthcare Fraud’ Bust

The US Department of Justice has announced charges for nearly 350 suspects in a sweeping bust linked to healthcare fraud .
Among them are scores of medical professionals accused of scamming federal programs and private insurers .
The DOJ went public with the nationwide takedown on Wednesday , saying it had filed charges against 345 defendants across 51 federal districts , including more than 100 doctors , nurses and other healthcare workers .
“ These defendants have been charged with submitting more than $ 6 billion in false and fraudulent claims to federal health care programs and private insurers , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , noting that a flurry of different federal agencies took part in the investigation , led by the DOJ ’ s criminal division .
[ The fraud included ] more than $ 4.5 billion connected to telemedicine , more than $ 845 million connected to substance abuse treatment facilities , or “ sober homes , ” and more than $ 806 million connected to other health care fraud and illegal opioid distribution schemes across the country .
The lion ’ s share of the fraud was linked to “ telemedicine ” – in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ via phone or video chat .
According to Department of Health and Human Services Deputy Inspector General Gary Cantrell , “ bad actors ” in the industry often use “ aggressive marketing techniques ” to mislead patients about their medical needs , and then “ bill the government for illegitimate services ” at exorbitant fees .
Some 86 suspects involved in the practice were slapped with charges across 19 districts , in some cases paying “ illegal kickbacks and bribes ” to medical companies that participated in the scheme .
Others are accused @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other government insurers .
More than a dozen defendants were indicted for making false claims related to drug rehabilitation centers , including physicians , facility owners and “ patient recruiters ” – or those paid to seek out drug addicts in order to enroll them into treatment clinics to keep the fraud scheme going .
Many of the patients were subjected to “ medically unnecessary ” drug screenings , allowing treatment centers to bill insurers for thousands of dollars per test .
They also charged for therapy sessions that never actually took place @ @ @ @ @ @ @ handed out unneeded medications , at times to “ entice ” patients to remain in treatment .
Many of those patients were later shopped around to other clinics in exchange for illegal kickbacks .
Some doctors also provided illicit prescriptions for highly addictive opioid drugs – which include morphine , oxycodone and fentanyl – some 30 million doses of which were handed out by physicians without medical justification .
The DOJ alleged another $ 800 million in fraud in connection to other attempts to swindle Medicare and Medicaid , as well as other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 240 additional suspects .
The massive fraud bust highlights a number of controversies surrounding the broader US healthcare apparatus , including the ongoing opioid epidemic – which has claimed some 450,000 lives in the US since 1999 , according to the CDC – sky-high costs for medical care and health insurance , as well as overall poor management of the system .
While ‘ Medicare for all ’ continues to be a rallying cry for American progressives , who ’ ve called to expand the program designed for the elderly to all citizens @ @ @ @ @ @ @ intervention only raises costs and lowers quality , some pointing to the inflated premiums that resulted from the former president Barack Obama ’ s Affordable Care Act .

The US Department of Justice has announced charges for nearly 350 suspects in a sweeping bust linked to healthcare fraud.
Among them are scores of medical professionals accused of scamming federal programs and private insurers.
The DOJ went public with the nationwide takedown on Wednesday, saying it had filed charges against 345 defendants across 51 federal districts, including more than 100 doctors, nurses and other healthcare workers.
“These defendants have been charged with submitting more than $6 billion in false and fraudulent claims to federal health care programs and private insurers,” the department said in a statement, noting that a flurry of different federal agencies took part in the investigation, led by the DOJ’s criminal division.
[The fraud included] more than $4.5 billion connected to telemedicine, more than $845 million connected to substance abuse treatment facilities, or “sober homes,” and more than $806 million connected to other health care fraud and illegal opioid distribution schemes across the country.
The lion’s share of the fraud was linked to “telemedicine” – in which doctors remotely diagnose and treat patients via phone or video chat.
According to Department of Health and Human Services Deputy Inspector General Gary Cantrell, “bad actors” in the industry often use “aggressive marketing techniques” to mislead patients about their medical needs, and then “bill the government for illegitimate services” at exorbitant fees.
Some 86 suspects involved in the practice were slapped with charges across 19 districts, in some cases paying “illegal kickbacks and bribes” to medical companies that participated in the scheme.
Others are accused of submitting false claims to Medicare and other government insurers.
More than a dozen defendants were indicted for making false claims related to drug rehabilitation centers, including physicians, facility owners and “patient recruiters” – or those paid to seek out drug addicts in order to enroll them into treatment clinics to keep the fraud scheme going.
Many of the patients were subjected to “medically unnecessary” drug screenings, allowing treatment centers to bill insurers for thousands of dollars per test.
They also charged for therapy sessions that never actually took place, while some of the doctors involved handed out unneeded medications, at times to “entice” patients to remain in treatment.
Many of those patients were later shopped around to other clinics in exchange for illegal kickbacks.
Some doctors also provided illicit prescriptions for highly addictive opioid drugs – which include morphine, oxycodone and fentanyl – some 30 million doses of which were handed out by physicians without medical justification.
The DOJ alleged another $800 million in fraud in connection to other attempts to swindle Medicare and Medicaid, as well as other government and private insurance programs, indicting 240 additional suspects.
The massive fraud bust highlights a number of controversies surrounding the broader US healthcare apparatus, including the ongoing opioid epidemic – which has claimed some 450,000 lives in the US since 1999, according to the CDC – sky-high costs for medical care and health insurance, as well as overall poor management of the system.
While ‘Medicare for all’ continues to be a rallying cry for American progressives, who’ve called to expand the program designed for the elderly to all citizens, opponents of state-provided healthcare argue government intervention only raises costs and lowers quality, some pointing to the inflated premiums that resulted from the former president Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act.
Source: Thefreethoughtproject.com


humansarefree--2020-10-03--A Virus is Not a Disease: The Absurdity of Covid ‘Cases’

Headlines announced Donald and Melania Trump “ tested positive ” for covid-19 .
Another claims nineteen thousand Amazon workers “ got ” covid-19 on the job .
Both of these pseudostories are sure to ignite another absurd media frenzy .
As always , the story keeps changing : Remember ventilators , flatten the curve , the next two weeks are crucial , etc.
?
Remember Nancy Pelosi in Chinatown back in February , urging everyone to visit ?
Remember Fauci dismissing masks as useless ?
Why should we believe anything the political/media complex tells us now ?
So what do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a covid “ case ” ?
Since the beginning of the coronavirus outbreak , most US media outlets have been exceedingly credulous and complicit in their reporting .
Journalists almost uniformly promote what we can call the “ prolockdown ” narrative , which is to wildly exaggerate the risks from covid-19 to serve a political agenda .
They may be motivated to hurt Trump politically , to promote a more socialist “ new normal , ” or simply to drive more clicks and views .
Bad news sells .
But the bias @ @ @ @ @ @ @ why media outlets use the terms “ case ” and “ infection ” so loosely , to the point of actively misinforming the public .
All of the endless talk about testing , testing , testing served to obscure two important facts .
First , the tests themselves are almost laughably unreliable in producing both false positives and negatives .
And what is the point ?
Are we going to test people again and again , every time they go out to the grocery or bump into a neighbor ?
Second , detecting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s respiratory tract tells us very little .
It certainly does not tell us they are sick , or transmitting sickness to anyone .
Take a perfectly healthy person with no particular symptoms and swab the inside of their nose .
If the culture shows the presence of staphylococcus aureus , do we insist they have a staph infection ?
When someone drives to work without incident or accident , do we create statistics about their exposure to traffic ?
A virus is not a disease .
Only a very small percentage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ — SARS-CoV-2 — show any kind of acute respiratory symptoms , or what we can call “ coronavirus disease.
” The only meaningful statistics show the incidence of serious illness , hospitalizations , and deaths .
The single most important statistic among these is the infection fatality rate ( IFR ) .
Data collected through July shows that the IFR for those under age forty-five is actually lower than that of the common flu .
The covid-19 IFR rises for those over fifty , but it is hardly a death sentence .
And @ @ @ @ @ @ @ preexisting health issues caused by obesity , diabetes , and heart disease .
If we could see data only for reasonably healthy people under fifty , the numbers would be even more reassuring .
Mild or asymptomatic covid cases are effectively meaningless .
The world is full of bacteria and viruses , and sometimes they make us a bit sick for a few days .
There are millions of them in the world all around us , on our skin , in our nose and respiratory tract , in our organs .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which is why we all have immune systems designed to help us coexist and adapt to ever-changing organisms .
We develop antibodies naturally , or we attempt to stimulate them through vaccines , but ultimately our own immune systems have to deal with covid-19 .
The virus will always be out there waiting , on the other side of any lockdown or mask—so we might as well get on with it .
From day one the focus should have been on boosting immunity through exercise , fresh air , sunlight , proper dietary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ well-being .
Instead our politicians , bureaucrats , and media insisted on business lockdowns , school closures , distancing , isolation , masks , and the mirage of a fast , effective vaccine .
As with almost everything in life , state intervention made the situation worse .
We can only hope many governors are removed from office , either by impeachment or at the next election .
Several , including Andrew Cuomo in New York and Gretchen Whitmer in Michigan , should face criminal charges for their lawless edicts .
There is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ health.
” Lockdowns were never justified , either in terms of the covid-19 risk or the staggering economic tradeoffs , which will be felt for decades .
They certainly are not justified now , given seven months of additional data showing that the transmission and lethality of covid-19 are not particularly worse than previous SARS , swine flu , or Ebola pandemics .
Click HERE for the Ultimate Proof That Covid-19 Was Planned To Usher In The New World Order We still don ’ t know how many of the reported two hundred @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the SARS-CoV-2 respiratory disease , or simply reflect people who died of other causes after exposure to covid-19 .
We do know that the harms caused by the lockdowns far outweigh the harms posed by the covid-19 virus .
We have had nearly eight months of life and liberty stolen from us by politicians and their hysteria-promoting accomplices in media .
How much more will we accept ?
Ultimate Proof : Covid-19 Was Planned To Usher In The New World Order

Headlines announced Donald and Melania Trump “tested positive” for covid-19. Another claims nineteen thousand Amazon workers “got” covid-19 on the job. Both of these pseudostories are sure to ignite another absurd media frenzy.
As always, the story keeps changing: Remember ventilators, flatten the curve, the next two weeks are crucial, etc.? Remember Nancy Pelosi in Chinatown back in February, urging everyone to visit? Remember Fauci dismissing masks as useless? Why should we believe anything the political/media complex tells us now?
So what do these headlines really mean? What exactly is a covid “case”?
Since the beginning of the coronavirus outbreak, most US media outlets have been exceedingly credulous and complicit in their reporting.
Journalists almost uniformly promote what we can call the “prolockdown” narrative, which is to wildly exaggerate the risks from covid-19 to serve a political agenda.
They may be motivated to hurt Trump politically, to promote a more socialist “new normal,” or simply to drive more clicks and views. Bad news sells. But the bias is clear and undeniable.
This explains why media outlets use the terms “case” and “infection” so loosely, to the point of actively misinforming the public. All of the endless talk about testing, testing, testing served to obscure two important facts.
First, the tests themselves are almost laughably unreliable in producing both false positives and negatives. And what is the point? Are we going to test people again and again, every time they go out to the grocery or bump into a neighbor?
Second, detecting virus particles or droplets in a human’s respiratory tract tells us very little. It certainly does not tell us they are sick, or transmitting sickness to anyone.
Take a perfectly healthy person with no particular symptoms and swab the inside of their nose.
If the culture shows the presence of staphylococcus aureus, do we insist they have a staph infection?
When someone drives to work without incident or accident, do we create statistics about their exposure to traffic?
A virus is not a disease. Only a very small percentage of those exposed to the virus itself — SARS-CoV-2 — show any kind of acute respiratory symptoms, or what we can call “coronavirus disease.”
The only meaningful statistics show the incidence of serious illness, hospitalizations, and deaths.
The single most important statistic among these is the infection fatality rate (IFR). Data collected through July shows that the IFR for those under age forty-five is actually lower than that of the common flu.
The covid-19 IFR rises for those over fifty, but it is hardly a death sentence. And the data does not segregate those with preexisting health issues caused by obesity, diabetes, and heart disease.
If we could see data only for reasonably healthy people under fifty, the numbers would be even more reassuring.
Mild or asymptomatic covid cases are effectively meaningless. The world is full of bacteria and viruses, and sometimes they make us a bit sick for a few days.
There are millions of them in the world all around us, on our skin, in our nose and respiratory tract, in our organs.
We are meant to live with them, which is why we all have immune systems designed to help us coexist and adapt to ever-changing organisms.
We develop antibodies naturally, or we attempt to stimulate them through jjabs, but ultimately our own immune systems have to deal with covid-19.
The virus will always be out there waiting, on the other side of any lockdown or mask—so we might as well get on with it.
From day one the focus should have been on boosting immunity through exercise, fresh air, sunlight, proper dietary supplementation, and the promotion of general well-being.
Instead our politicians, bureaucrats, and media insisted on business lockdowns, school closures, distancing, isolation, masks, and the mirage of a fast, effective jjab.
As with almost everything in life, state intervention made the situation worse. We can only hope many governors are removed from office, either by impeachment or at the next election.
Several, including Andrew Cuomo in New York and Gretchen Whitmer in Michigan, should face criminal charges for their lawless edicts. There is no due process exception for “public health.”
Lockdowns were never justified, either in terms of the covid-19 risk or the staggering economic tradeoffs, which will be felt for decades.
They certainly are not justified now, given seven months of additional data showing that the transmission and lethality of covid-19 are not particularly worse than previous SARS, swine flu, or Ebola pandemics.
We still don’t know how many of the reported two hundred thousand US covid-19 deaths were actually caused by the SARS-CoV-2 respiratory disease, or simply reflect people who died of other causes after exposure to covid-19.
We do know that the harms caused by the lockdowns far outweigh the harms posed by the covid-19 virus.
We have had nearly eight months of life and liberty stolen from us by politicians and their hysteria-promoting accomplices in media. How much more will we accept?
Ultimate Proof: Covid-19 Was Planned To Usher In The New World Order
Source: MISES.org