humansarefree--2020-10-01--Three ‘Great Flood’ Stories That Predate the Bible

Evidence has been brought forward by a number of archaeologists who argue that a massive deluge swept across the Earth between 5,000 and 7,000 years ago .
Some argue that the historic flood may have happened , but not on a global scale , as there are those who argue that a flooding occurred in the area of what is today the Black Sea , an area many refer to as the ‘ cradle of civilization ’ .
And while Noah ’ s story of the Flood may be one of the most popular ones , the truth is that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ story out there .
In fact , there are a number of flood stories that predate the flood described in the Bible .
Flood myths can be traced back into the Bronze Age and Neolithic prehistory .
Flood stories are often referred to as new starting points in human history .
Translation of ancient cuneiform tablets discovered in the 19th century suggests the Mesopotamia Flood may have been an antecedent of Noah ’ s flood mentioned in the bible .
The ancient Sumerian Nippur tablet is believed to describe the oldest account of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ both humans and animals on Earth .
It also records the names of Antediluvian cities on earth and their respective rulers .
In ancient Mesopotamian mythology , we find flood stories concerning the epics of Ziusudra , Gilgamesh , and Atrahasis .
In fact , the Sumerian King List divides its history into preflood ( antediluvian ) and postflood periods .
Before the flood had swept across the land , Earth was ruled by kings who had monstrous lifespans .
In postflood myths , these lifespans were drastically reduced .
The Sumerian Flood @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It narrates the epic of Ziusudra , who , after finding out that the Gods plan to destroy humanity with a great flood , constructs a massive vessel which eventually saves him from the rising waters .
In the Sumerian King List , we read about the history of mankind , its Gods and rulers before the flood .
The Sumerian King list suggests how Eridu was the first city on Earth .
In fact , according to Sumerian mythology , Eridu was one of the five ancient cities that were built @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ After the kingship descended from heaven , the kingship was in Eridug .
In Eridug , Alulim became king ; he ruled for 28,800 years .
Alaljar ruled for 36,000 years .
2 kings ; they ruled for 64,800 years .
Then Eridug fell and the kingship was taken to Bad-tibira .
“ In Bad-tibira , En-men-lu-ana ruled for 43,200 years .
En-men-gal-ana ruled for 28,800 years .
Dumuzid , the shepherd , ruled for 36,000 years .
3 kings ; they ruled for 108,000 years… Then the flood swept over.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mentioned as the first city of the Gods .
“ After the flood had swept over , and the kingship had descended from heaven , the kingship was in Kish.
” A total of twenty-two kings ruled for a period of 16 , 480 years , which make up the first dynasty of Kish .
2 .
The Aztec Story of the great flood According to the ancient Aztecs , a massive flood swept across the lands .
No matter where we look , we find descriptions of a massive deluge that swept @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
With a few differences , we can say that nearly all flood stories are similar in one way or another .
The Great Flood was supposedly sent by God or the gods upon the earth in order to destroy civilization as an act of divine punishment .
“ Before the great flood which took place 4,800 years after the creation of the world , the country of Anahuac was inhabited by giants , all of whom either perished in the inundation or were transformed into fishes , save seven who fled into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , one of the giants , the great Xelhua , nicknamed the ‘ Architect , ’ traveled to Cholula , where , as a memorial of the Tlaloc which had served for an asylum to himself and his six brethren , he built an artificial hill in the form of a pyramid… ” Not far from the Aztecs we find another flood story sent by the Gods .
3 .
The Unu Pachakuti is , according to Incan mythology , a flood sent by the God Viracocha to destroy the people near Lake @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to have lasted for 60 days and 60 nights .
Before creating humans , Viracocha created a race of giants that inhabited Earth , but he destroyed them in a flood as they proved to be unruly .
The giants were eventually turned into stone .
Viracocha , one of the most prominent Andean deities decides to save only two people , in the massive flood , giving mankind a fresh start , and bringing ‘ civilization ’ to the rest of the world .

Evidence has been brought forward by a number of archaeologists who argue that a massive deluge swept across the Earth between 5,000 and 7,000 years ago.
Some argue that the historic flood may have happened, but not on a global scale, as there are those who argue that a flooding occurred in the area of what is today the Black Sea, an area many refer to as the ‘cradle of civilization’.
And while Noah’s story of the Flood may be one of the most popular ones, the truth is that it isn’t the only flood story out there.
In fact, there are a number of flood stories that predate the flood described in the Bible.
Flood myths can be traced back into the Bronze Age and Neolithic prehistory. Flood stories are often referred to as new starting points in human history.
1. Ancient Cuneiform Tablets and the Mesopotamian Flood
Translation of ancient cuneiform tablets discovered in the 19th century suggests the Mesopotamia Flood may have been an antecedent of Noah’s flood mentioned in the bible.
The ancient Sumerian Nippur tablet is believed to describe the oldest account of the Great Flood and the creation of both humans and animals on Earth.
It also records the names of Antediluvian cities on earth and their respective rulers.
In ancient Mesopotamian mythology, we find flood stories concerning the epics of Ziusudra, Gilgamesh, and Atrahasis.
In fact, the Sumerian King List divides its history into preflood (antediluvian) and postflood periods.
Before the flood had swept across the land, Earth was ruled by kings who had monstrous lifespans. In postflood myths, these lifespans were drastically reduced.
The Sumerian Flood story is described in the Deluge Tablet.
It narrates the epic of Ziusudra, who, after finding out that the Gods plan to destroy humanity with a great flood, constructs a massive vessel which eventually saves him from the rising waters.
In the Sumerian King List, we read about the history of mankind, its Gods and rulers before the flood.
The Sumerian King list suggests how Eridu was the first city on Earth.
In fact, according to Sumerian mythology, Eridu was one of the five ancient cities that were built on Earth before the Great Deluge.
The Sumerian King List reads:
“After the kingship descended from heaven, the kingship was in Eridug. In Eridug, Alulim became king; he ruled for 28,800 years. Alaljar ruled for 36,000 years. 2 kings; they ruled for 64,800 years. Then Eridug fell and the kingship was taken to Bad-tibira.
“In Bad-tibira, En-men-lu-ana ruled for 43,200 years. En-men-gal-ana ruled for 28,800 years. Dumuzid, the shepherd, ruled for 36,000 years. 3 kings; they ruled for 108,000 years… Then the flood swept over.”
After the Great Flood, Kish is mentioned as the first city of the Gods.
“After the flood had swept over, and the kingship had descended from heaven, the kingship was in Kish.”
A total of twenty-two kings ruled for a period of 16, 480 years, which make up the first dynasty of Kish.
2. The Aztec Story of the great flood
According to the ancient Aztecs, a massive flood swept across the lands.
No matter where we look, we find descriptions of a massive deluge that swept across the Earth in the distant past.
With a few differences, we can say that nearly all flood stories are similar in one way or another.
The Great Flood was supposedly sent by God or the gods upon the earth in order to destroy civilization as an act of divine punishment.
According to ancient mythology:
“Before the great flood which took place 4,800 years after the creation of the world, the country of Anahuac was inhabited by giants, all of whom either perished in the inundation or were transformed into fishes, save seven who fled into caverns.
“When the waters subsided, one of the giants, the great Xelhua, nicknamed the ‘Architect,’ traveled to Cholula, where, as a memorial of the Tlaloc which had served for an asylum to himself and his six brethren, he built an artificial hill in the form of a pyramid…”
Not far from the Aztecs we find another flood story sent by the Gods.
3. The Unu Pachakuti is, according to Incan mythology, a flood sent by the God Viracocha to destroy the people near Lake Titicaca. This great flood is said to have lasted for 60 days and 60 nights.
Before creating humans, Viracocha created a race of giants that inhabited Earth, but he destroyed them in a flood as they proved to be unruly. The giants were eventually turned into stone.
Viracocha, one of the most prominent Andean deities decides to save only two people, in the massive flood, giving mankind a fresh start, and bringing ‘civilization’ to the rest of the world.
Reference: Ancient-code.com


humansarefree--2020-09-30--Fahrenheit 451 Predicted People Would Eventually Demand Tyranny

Even if it has been a while since you read Fahrenheit 451 , you might remember Ray Bradbury ’ s classic for its portrayal of a dystopian future in which an authoritarian government burns books .
Read Fahrenheit 451 again to discover why people wanted their tyrannical government to burn books .
Bradbury wrote Fahrenheit 451 in 1953 , yet the parallels to today ’ s social climate for censorship are haunting .
Bradbury ’ s protagonist is Guy Montag , who , like all firemen in Bradbury ’ s future , burns books .
In Bradbury ’ s dystopia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ peace of mind , the focus of our understandable and rightful dread of being inferior ; official censors , judges , and executors.
” Today ’ s mainstream and social media are “ custodians of our peace of mind ” as they filter out “ conflicting theory and thought.
” Captain Beatty is Montag ’ s boss .
Beatty explained , “ If you don ’ t want a man unhappy politically , don ’ t give him two sides to a question to worry him ; give him one.
” If you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such as Covid-19 policy , Beatty has the ticket : “ Cram them full of noncombustible data , chock them so damned full of ‘ facts ’ they feel stuffed , but absolutely ` brilliant ’ with information .
Then they ’ ll feel they ’ re thinking , they ’ ll get a sense of motion without moving.
” Today , millions listen daily to reports of case counts of Covid-19 .
Like Bradbury predicted , listeners can recite the numbers but have no context to make sense of the numbers .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ and doctors have advocated alternatives to lockdowns that could save lives and abate catastrophic impacts on economies .
As in Bradbury ’ s world , many are working tirelessly to disparage and censor alternative views .
After Montag questions his role as a book burner , he recites Dover Beach by Matthew Arnold to neighbors .
His neighbors were shocked at the feelings the poem provoked .
One cries out , “ Silly words , silly words , silly awful hurting words… Why do people want to hurt people ?
Not enough hurt @ @ @ @ @ @ @ got to tease people with stuff like that !
” Incredibly , Bradbury anticipated today ’ s social climate where people claim censorship is justified because someone hurt their feelings .
Beatty explains a dominant social norm justifying censorship : Do not offend minorities .
Bradbury is clear ; “ minorities ” meant practically everyone : “ Don ’ t step on the toes of the dog-lovers , the cat-lovers , doctors , lawyers , merchants , chiefs , Mormons , Baptists , Unitarians , second-generation Chinese , Swedes , Italians , Germans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people from Oregon or Mexico.
” Pretending you can “ stay happy all the time ” was another social norm driving popular demand for censorship in Fahrenheit 451 .
Beatty explains , “ [ Censorship ] didn ’ t come from the Government down .
There was no dictum , no declaration , no censorship , to start with , no !
“ Technology , mass exploitation , and minority pressure carried the trick , thank God .
Today , thanks to them , you can stay happy all the time , you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ good old confessions , or trade journals.
” In Bradbury ’ s dystopia , to consider conflicting theories makes for unhappiness , so Beatty lauds the fireman ’ s mission and justifies censorship : “ The important thing for you to remember , Montag , is we ’ re the Happiness Boys , the Dixie Duo , you and I and the others .
We stand against the small tide of those who want to make everyone unhappy with conflicting theory and thought .
“ We have our fingers in the dyke .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the torrent of melancholy and dreary philosophy drown our world .
We depend on you .
I don ’ t think you realize how important you are , we are , to our happy world as it stands now.
” In Bradbury ’ s future , intellectuals came under scrutiny when ideas conflicted .
The word “ intellectual ” became a “ swear word.
” The public dreaded “ the unfamiliar ” and disdained a world where merit mattered .
Again , Bradbury has Beatty explain the mindset behind such thinking : “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ everyone born free and equal , as the Constitution says , but everyone made equal .
Each man the image of every other ; then all are happy , for there are no mountains to make them cower , to judge themselves against .
“ So !
A book is a loaded gun in the house next door .
Burn it .
Take the shot from the weapon .
Breach man ’ s mind .
Who knows who might be the target of the well read man ?
” In Bradbury ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Even front porches were eliminated .
One of Montag ’ s young neighbors explained why : “ People sat there sometimes at night , talking when they wanted to talk , rocking , and not talking when they didn ’ t want to talk .
“ Sometimes they just sat there and thought about things , turned things over… they didn ’ t want people sitting like that , doing nothing , rocking , talking ; that was the wrong kind of social life .
People talked too much .
And they had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ today embraced as a way to keep us safe from Covid-19 .
Social distancing also keeps us safe from “ conflicting theories and thoughts.
” Chairs have been removed from social gathering places .
Hallways are quiet .
Nobody stands around the water cooler .
People have few places to talk with each other .
The parallel to porches is haunting .
Perhaps you are sensing a shift in social norms undermining parental rights and the sanctity of the family .
Bradbury foresaw a push for government-funded pre-school .
“ The home environment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do at school .
That ’ s why we ’ ve lowered the kindergarten age year after year until now we ’ re almost snatching them from the cradle.
” Bradbury also anticipated today ’ s justification of looting .
Some claim that rioters are merely damaging property , not people .
Before he began to see the evil he was part of , Montag eased his conscience with this similar line of thinking : “ You weren ’ t hurting anyone , you were hurting only things !
And since things really @ @ @ @ @ @ @ things felt nothing , and things don ’ t scream or whimper.
” Warning his readers of policies shaped by the majority , Bradbury writes , “ The most dangerous enemy of truth and freedom , the solid unmoving cattle of the majority .
Oh , God , the terrible tyranny of the majority.
” Today , politicians claim the right to destroy freedom when they get a majority vote of the people .
This dangerous reasoning is antithetical to the founding principles of this country .
We can take a lesson from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who recognized the consequences of his own self-censorship : “ I saw the way things were going , a long time back .
I said nothing .
I ’ m one of the innocents who could have spoken up and out when no one would listen to the ` guilty , ’ but I did not speak and thus became guilty myself.
” How ironic that today , claiming they are “ woke , ” progressives clamor for tyranny and censorship .
In Bradbury ’ s world the “ woke ” saw through @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bradbury would exhort us to avoid expediency and speak out to prevent the worst .
Mankind finds itself at the intersection of 3 dystopian novels , which seem to have been used as manuals for enslavement by the powers that shouldn ’ t be : Orwell ’ s 1984 , Hauxley ’ s Brave New World and Bradbury ’ s Fahrenheit 451 .
In his novel , Bradbury didn ’ t take a deep dive into the psychology of saying nothing .
My recent essay on mask mandates by businesses provoked a strong @ @ @ @ @ @ @ point that businesses respond to consumer demand .
Yet , some believe that business policy is being shaped by a small but frightened and very vocal minority who complain loudly to managers about customers not wearing a mask .
Going against the vocal herd takes courage .
In his book The Heart Aroused , poet David Whyte , who works with businesses on organizational change issues , shares a universal story : “ A man I know finds himself in a meeting room at the very edge of speech ; he is approaching @ @ @ @ @ @ @ looking for support from his fellow executives around the table … the CEO is pacing up and down on the slate gray carpet .
He has asked , in no uncertain terms , for their opinion of the plan he wants to put through .
‘ I want to know what you all think about this , ’ he demands , ‘ on a scale of one to ten.
’ ” Whyte explains the CEO made it plain he wanted to hear “ ten.
” Whyte ’ s friend thinks the plan is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ executives feel the same .
As the CEO goes around the room , Whyte ’ s friend hears his colleague , one by one , say “ ten.
” When it is his turn , “ against everything he believes , ( Whyte ’ s friend ) hears a mouselike , faraway voice , his own , saying ‘ ten.
’ ” According to Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann ’ s theory of the spiral of silence , “ our willingness to express an opinion is a direct result of how popular or unpopular we perceive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our belief is popular , we will make a point of signaling that we are part of the herd .
Like Whyte ’ s friend , we will avoid expressing our point of view when we sense it will be unpopular .
If you think the public is empowered by social media to express unpopular views , you would be mistaken .
As in Fahrenheit 451 , people censor themselves first , even before Facebook and Twitter add their own censorship .
In 2014 , the Pew Research Center surveyed the public about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about the 2013 Edward Snowden revelations .
The survey revealed that “ people were less willing to discuss the Snowden-NSA story on social media than they were in person.
” Social media was not an outlet for those concerned about expressing an unpopular view .
Consistent with the “ spiral of silence ” theory and compatible with Bradbury ’ s dystopian future , no matter what the setting , people are reluctant to share an unpopular view .
A 2020 Cato survey found 62 % “ of Americans say the political climate these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ believe because others might find them offensive.
” Today , how many say nothing to their neighbors and colleagues about Covid-19 policies for fear of being accused of not valuing human lives ?
In Fahrenheit 451 , silence helped pave the way for the public ’ s embrace of tyranny .
In 2020 , Fahrenheit 451 is far more than a chilling , cautionary tale .
To reverse the spiral of silence we must make space for candid conversations by thoughtfully considering alternative viewpoints .
By Barry Brownstein – professor emeritus of economics @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
He is senior contributor at Intellectual Takeout and the author of The Inner-Work of Leadership .

Even if it has been a while since you read Fahrenheit 451, you might remember Ray Bradbury’s classic for its portrayal of a dystopian future in which an authoritarian government burns books.
Read Fahrenheit 451 again to discover why people wanted their tyrannical government to burn books. Bradbury wrote Fahrenheit 451 in 1953, yet the parallels to today’s social climate for censorship are haunting.
Bradbury’s protagonist is Guy Montag, who, like all firemen in Bradbury’s future, burns books.
In Bradbury’s dystopia, firemen became “custodians of our peace of mind, the focus of our understandable and rightful dread of being inferior; official censors, judges, and executors.”
Today’s mainstream and social media are “custodians of our peace of mind” as they filter out “conflicting theory and thought.” Captain Beatty is Montag’s boss.
Beatty explained, “If you don’t want a man unhappy politically, don’t give him two sides to a question to worry him; give him one.”
If you don’t want people debating questions such as Covid-19 policy, Beatty has the ticket:
“Cram them full of noncombustible data, chock them so damned full of ‘facts’ they feel stuffed, but absolutely `brilliant’ with information. Then they’ll feel they’re thinking, they’ll get a sense of motion without moving.”
Today, millions listen daily to reports of case counts of Covid-19. Like Bradbury predicted, listeners can recite the numbers but have no context to make sense of the numbers.
Many have little idea that important scientists and doctors have advocated alternatives to lockdowns that could save lives and abate catastrophic impacts on economies.
As in Bradbury’s world, many are working tirelessly to disparage and censor alternative views.
After Montag questions his role as a book burner, he recites Dover Beach by Matthew Arnold to neighbors. His neighbors were shocked at the feelings the poem provoked.
One cries out, “Silly words, silly words, silly awful hurting words… Why do people want to hurt people? Not enough hurt in the world, you’ve got to tease people with stuff like that!”
Incredibly, Bradbury anticipated today’s social climate where people claim censorship is justified because someone hurt their feelings.
Beatty explains a dominant social norm justifying censorship: Do not offend minorities. Bradbury is clear; “minorities” meant practically everyone:
“Don’t step on the toes of the dog-lovers, the cat-lovers, doctors, lawyers, merchants, chiefs, Mormons, Baptists, Unitarians, second-generation Chinese, Swedes, Italians, Germans, Texans, Brooklynites, Irishmen, people from Oregon or Mexico.”
Pretending you can “stay happy all the time” was another social norm driving popular demand for censorship in Fahrenheit 451. Beatty explains,
“[Censorship] didn’t come from the Government down. There was no dictum, no declaration, no censorship, to start with, no!
“Technology, mass exploitation, and minority pressure carried the trick, thank God. Today, thanks to them, you can stay happy all the time, you are allowed to read comics, the good old confessions, or trade journals.”
In Bradbury’s dystopia, to consider conflicting theories makes for unhappiness, so Beatty lauds the fireman’s mission and justifies censorship:
“The important thing for you to remember, Montag, is we’re the Happiness Boys, the Dixie Duo, you and I and the others. We stand against the small tide of those who want to make everyone unhappy with conflicting theory and thought.
“We have our fingers in the dyke. Hold steady. Don’t let the torrent of melancholy and dreary philosophy drown our world. We depend on you. I don’t think you realize how important you are, we are, to our happy world as it stands now.”
In Bradbury’s future, intellectuals came under scrutiny when ideas conflicted. The word “intellectual” became a “swear word.”
The public dreaded “the unfamiliar” and disdained a world where merit mattered. Again, Bradbury has Beatty explain the mindset behind such thinking:
“We must all be alike. Not everyone born free and equal, as the Constitution says, but everyone made equal. Each man the image of every other; then all are happy, for there are no mountains to make them cower, to judge themselves against.
“So! A book is a loaded gun in the house next door. Burn it. Take the shot from the weapon. Breach man’s mind. Who knows who might be the target of the well read man?”
In Bradbury’s dystopia, thinking was not welcome. Even front porches were eliminated. One of Montag’s young neighbors explained why:
“People sat there sometimes at night, talking when they wanted to talk, rocking, and not talking when they didn’t want to talk.
“Sometimes they just sat there and thought about things, turned things over… they didn’t want people sitting like that, doing nothing, rocking, talking; that was the wrong kind of social life. People talked too much. And they had time to think.”
Social distancing is today embraced as a way to keep us safe from Covid-19. Social distancing also keeps us safe from “conflicting theories and thoughts.” Chairs have been removed from social gathering places. Hallways are quiet. Nobody stands around the water cooler. People have few places to talk with each other. The parallel to porches is haunting.
Perhaps you are sensing a shift in social norms undermining parental rights and the sanctity of the family. Bradbury foresaw a push for government-funded pre-school.
Captain Beatty explains,
“The home environment can undo a lot you try to do at school. That’s why we’ve lowered the kindergarten age year after year until now we’re almost snatching them from the cradle.”
Bradbury also anticipated today’s justification of looting. Some claim that rioters are merely damaging property, not people.
Before he began to see the evil he was part of, Montag eased his conscience with this similar line of thinking:
“You weren’t hurting anyone, you were hurting only things! And since things really couldn’t be hurt, since things felt nothing, and things don’t scream or whimper.”
Warning his readers of policies shaped by the majority, Bradbury writes, “The most dangerous enemy of truth and freedom, the solid unmoving cattle of the majority.
Oh, God, the terrible tyranny of the majority.” Today, politicians claim the right to destroy freedom when they get a majority vote of the people. This dangerous reasoning is antithetical to the founding principles of this country.
We can take a lesson from Bradbury’s character Professor Faber, who recognized the consequences of his own self-censorship:
“I saw the way things were going, a long time back. I said nothing. I’m one of the innocents who could have spoken up and out when no one would listen to the `guilty,’ but I did not speak and thus became guilty myself.”
How ironic that today, claiming they are “woke,” progressives clamor for tyranny and censorship.
In Bradbury’s world the “woke” saw through the lies of tyranny and censorship. Bradbury would exhort us to avoid expediency and speak out to prevent the worst.
Mankind finds itself at the intersection of 3 dystopian novels, which seem to have been used as manuals for enslavement by the powers that shouldn’t be: Orwell’s 1984, Hauxley’s Brave New World and Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451.
In his novel, Bradbury didn’t take a deep dive into the psychology of saying nothing.
My recent essay on mask mandates by businesses provoked a strong response. Many were sympathetic to my point that businesses respond to consumer demand.
Yet, some believe that business policy is being shaped by a small but frightened and very vocal minority who complain loudly to managers about customers not wearing a mask.
Going against the vocal herd takes courage. In his book The Heart Aroused, poet David Whyte, who works with businesses on organizational change issues, shares a universal story:
“A man I know finds himself in a meeting room at the very edge of speech; he is approaching his moment of reckoning, he is looking for support from his fellow executives around the table … the CEO is pacing up and down on the slate gray carpet. He has asked, in no uncertain terms, for their opinion of the plan he wants to put through. ‘I want to know what you all think about this,’ he demands, ‘on a scale of one to ten.’”
Whyte explains the CEO made it plain he wanted to hear “ten.” Whyte’s friend thinks the plan is terrible, and rumors are that other executives feel the same.
As the CEO goes around the room, Whyte’s friend hears his colleague, one by one, say “ten.” When it is his turn, “against everything he believes, (Whyte’s friend) hears a mouselike, faraway voice, his own, saying ‘ten.’”
According to Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann’s theory of the spiral of silence, “our willingness to express an opinion is a direct result of how popular or unpopular we perceive it to be.”
When we believe our belief is popular, we will make a point of signaling that we are part of the herd. Like Whyte’s friend, we will avoid expressing our point of view when we sense it will be unpopular.
If you think the public is empowered by social media to express unpopular views, you would be mistaken.
As in Fahrenheit 451, people censor themselves first, even before Facebook and Twitter add their own censorship.
In 2014, the Pew Research Center surveyed the public about their willingness to freely express their views about the 2013 Edward Snowden revelations.
The survey revealed that “people were less willing to discuss the Snowden-NSA story on social media than they were in person.” Social media was not an outlet for those concerned about expressing an unpopular view.
Consistent with the “spiral of silence” theory and compatible with Bradbury’s dystopian future, no matter what the setting, people are reluctant to share an unpopular view.
A 2020 Cato survey found 62% “of Americans say the political climate these days prevents them from saying things they believe because others might find them offensive.”
Today, how many say nothing to their neighbors and colleagues about Covid-19 policies for fear of being accused of not valuing human lives? In Fahrenheit 451, silence helped pave the way for the public’s embrace of tyranny.
In 2020, Fahrenheit 451 is far more than a chilling, cautionary tale. To reverse the spiral of silence we must make space for candid conversations by thoughtfully considering alternative viewpoints.
By Barry Brownstein – professor emeritus of economics and leadership at the University of Baltimore. He is senior contributor at Intellectual Takeout and the author of The Inner-Work of Leadership.


humansarefree--2020-10-01--CNN Claims Society Will Never Go ‘Back to Normal’ & Draconian Measures Implemented Are Permanent

CNN has confirmed the obvious : the globalist elite never intend to return to normal and plan to make the Draconian measures implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic permanent .
CNN senior International correspondent Nick Paton Walsh wrote the article giving away the plot .
The world will be forever changed because of COVID-19 , a.k.a .
the China plague , and freedom will never return .
“ We are slowly learning if this year ’ s changes are permanent .
If work — for the lucky among us — will remain from home .
If we will visit the grocery @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we will find wearing a mask on the metro to be just part of life .
If shaking hands and embracing will become less common , ” Walsh wrote .
He wrote that anyone who doesn ’ t accept that these changes must be permanent and for the greater good is mentally ill. “ Yet permanently severing ties with January is not necessarily a bad thing , psychologists say .
The danger comes from hankering for normalcy again , rather than getting on with working out how to deal with whatever is ahead @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who don ’ t adapt to change believe what they remember as “ normal ” will return , and delay modifying their daily routines or outlook .
Those who refuse to wear masks may be guilty of normalcy bias , ” he added .
“ As with everything , we will find out just how resilient we are , and the future may seem normal again , however different it is , ” Walsh concluded .
Big League Politics has reported on how the worst overreach from the pandemic is yet to come @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be implemented throughout society : The late plutocrat and engineer of globalism David Rockefeller once said at a United Nations dinner : “ All we need is the right crisis and the people will accept the New World Order.
” With COVID-19 , it seems that the right crisis has finally arrived to usher in the new era of globalism .
The mass media is already priming the public for the new permanent changes to society that are all but inevitable at this point .
BBC News has laid out their grand @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” of what the central planners and technocrats intend society to look like by 2022 .
“ It ’ s 2022 and you ’ ve just arrived at the travel destination of your dreams .
As you get off the plane , a robot greets you with a red laser beam that remotely takes your temperature .
You ’ re still half asleep after a long transoceanic flight , so your brain barely registers the robot ’ s complacent beep .
You had just passed similar checks when boarding the plane hours ago @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and can just stroll to the next health checkpoint , ” BBC reporter Lina Zeldovich wrote .
Zeldovich lays out the reality of endless health checks , breathalyzers with microchips in them , and microscopic ink tattoos to track vaccine compliance .
All of this would be required in airports to travel , at first , and then be rolled out as mandatory to participate in normal functions of society .
She notes that the mark-of-the-beast vaccine tracking tattoo has already been tested on animals and corpses , thanks to the generous support @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ The macro-needles don ’ t leave scars and are less invasive than the regular needles – it ’ s like putting on a Band-Aid , ” said researcher Ana Jaklenec of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology .
“ It can even be done with a modified phone.
” The New ‘ Normal ’ Vs .
The People – We Do Have Some Say In All This The people will have to demand their freedom and revolt against this new normal in order for their liberties to return .
With so many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ losing their souls to the mass hysteria , that is not likely .
The Orwellian Nightmare has arrived in full force .

CNN has confirmed the obvious: the globalist elite never intend to return to normal and plan to make the Draconian measures implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic permanent.
CNN senior International correspondent Nick Paton Walsh wrote the article giving away the plot. The world will be forever changed because of COVID-19, a.k.a. the China plague, and freedom will never return.
“We are slowly learning if this year’s changes are permanent. If work — for the lucky among us — will remain from home. If we will visit the grocery store less but spend more. If we will find wearing a mask on the metro to be just part of life. If shaking hands and embracing will become less common,” Walsh wrote.
He wrote that anyone who doesn’t accept that these changes must be permanent and for the greater good is mentally ill.
“Yet permanently severing ties with January is not necessarily a bad thing, psychologists say. The danger comes from hankering for normalcy again, rather than getting on with working out how to deal with whatever is ahead,” Walsh wrote.
“People who don’t adapt to change believe what they remember as “normal” will return, and delay modifying their daily routines or outlook. Those who refuse to wear masks may be guilty of normalcy bias,” he added.
“As with everything, we will find out just how resilient we are, and the future may seem normal again, however different it is,” Walsh concluded.
Big League Politics has reported on how the worst overreach from the pandemic is yet to come, with hellish Big Brother technology ready to be implemented throughout society:
The late plutocrat and engineer of globalism David Rockefeller once said at a United Nations dinner: “All we need is the right crisis and the people will accept the New World Order.”

With COVID-19, it seems that the right crisis has finally arrived to usher in the new era of globalism. The mass media is already priming the public for the new permanent changes to society that are all but inevitable at this point.
BBC News has laid out their grand vision of the Orwellian “new normal” of what the central planners and technocrats intend society to look like by 2022.
“It’s 2022 and you’ve just arrived at the travel destination of your dreams. As you get off the plane, a robot greets you with a red laser beam that remotely takes your temperature.
You’re still half asleep after a long transoceanic flight, so your brain barely registers the robot’s complacent beep.
You had just passed similar checks when boarding the plane hours ago so you have nothing to worry about and can just stroll to the next health checkpoint,” BBC reporter Lina Zeldovich wrote.
Zeldovich lays out the reality of endless health checks, breathalyzers with microchips in them, and microscopic ink tattoos to track jjab compliance.
All of this would be required in airports to travel, at first, and then be rolled out as mandatory to participate in normal functions of society.
She notes that the mark-of-the-beast jjab tracking tattoo has already been tested on animals and corpses, thanks to the generous support of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
“The macro-needles don’t leave scars and are less invasive than the regular needles – it’s like putting on a Band-Aid,” said researcher Ana Jaklenec of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “It can even be done with a modified phone.”
The New ‘Normal’ Vs. The People – We Do Have Some Say In All This
The people will have to demand their freedom and revolt against this new normal in order for their liberties to return.
With so many millions of poor saps throughout the world losing their souls to the mass hysteria, that is not likely. The Orwellian Nightmare has arrived in full force.
Source: BigLeaguePolitics.com


humansarefree--2020-10-01--And Just Like That, UFO ‘Crash Retrievals’ Are Now Mainstream

Eric W. Davis , a renowned astrophysicist who worked as a subcontractor and then a consultant for the Pentagon UFO program since 2007 , recently stated that , in some cases , the examination of the material retrieved from some UFOs has , according to the New York times , “ failed to determine their source ” which has led Davis to conclude that “ We couldn ’ t make it ourselves.
” The New York times went on to explain “ Davis , who now works for Aerospace Corp , a defense contractor , said he gave a classified @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recently as March about retrievals from “ off-world vehicles not made on this Earth.
” Here are a few of his publications if you ’ re interested in exploring further .
How cool would it have been to have been at that briefing ?
The New York Times is claiming , or was told , that the government could not identify the source , but according to Davis , they clearly know that these materials are not made from Earth .
As a side note , the picture you see at the top @ @ @ @ @ @ @ senior scientist Norman Bergrun , taken from the Voyager mission in 1980 .
It ’ s an unidentified craft that is extremely and unimaginably large .
Norman believes these are “ extraterrestrial vehicles.
” The Voyager mission was tasked with photographing Saturn , its rings and its moons .
You can read more about that specific story and the picture here .
When someone like Eric Davis speaks , it ’ s hard not to take notice of what he is saying and explore it with an open mind .
For many years @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Institute for Discovery Sciences ( NIDS ) ( Owned by Robert Bigelow ) , the Chief Science Officer of EarthTech Int ’ l , Inc. and the Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin in Austin , Texas .
He is the Owner/ Chief Executive/ Chief Scientist of Warp Drive Metrics who consults and contracts for the Department of Defense .
He is also an Adjunct Professor in the Early Universe , Cosmology and Strings Group at the Center for Astrophysics , Space Physics & Engineering Research at Baylor University in Waco , TX @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that he himself is aware of the source of these objects , just as many others have as well .
The New York Times doesn ’ t touch on that in their reporting however .
We ’ ll explore the potential reason why the NYT left that out in a moment .
“ Yes there have been crashed craft , and bodies recovered.
” – Apollo 14 astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell ( source )

Eric W. Davis, a renowned astrophysicist who worked as a subcontractor and then a consultant for the Pentagon UFO program since 2007, recently stated that, in some cases, the examination of the material retrieved from some UFOs has, according to the New York times, “failed to determine their source” which has led Davis to conclude that “We couldn’t make it ourselves.”
The New York times went on to explain “Davis, who now works for Aerospace Corp, a defense contractor, said he gave a classified briefing to a Defense Department Agency as recently as March about retrievals from “off-world vehicles not made on this Earth.”
Here are a few of his publications if you’re interested in exploring further.
How cool would it have been to have been at that briefing? The New York Times is claiming, or was told, that the government could not identify the source, but according to Davis, they clearly know that these materials are not made from Earth.
As a side note, the picture you see at the top of this article comes from NASA/ Lockheed senior scientist Norman Bergrun, taken from the Voyager mission in 1980.
It’s an unidentified craft that is extremely and unimaginably large. Norman believes these are “extraterrestrial vehicles.”
The Voyager mission was tasked with photographing Saturn, its rings and its moons. You can read more about that specific story and the picture here.
When someone like Eric Davis speaks, it’s hard not to take notice of what he is saying and explore it with an open mind.
For many years he was a member of the National Institute for Discovery Sciences (NIDS) (Owned by Robert Bigelow), the Chief Science Officer of EarthTech Int’l, Inc. and the Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin in Austin, Texas.
He is the Owner/ Chief Executive/ Chief Scientist of Warp Drive Metrics who consults and contracts for the Department of Defense.
He is also an Adjunct Professor in the Early Universe, Cosmology and Strings Group at the Center for Astrophysics, Space Physics & Engineering Research at Baylor University in Waco, TX.
Davis has hinted to the idea that he himself is aware of the source of these objects, just as many others have as well.
The New York Times doesn’t touch on that in their reporting however. We’ll explore the potential reason why the NYT left that out in a moment.
“Yes there have been crashed craft, and bodies recovered.” – Apollo 14 astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell (source)
Source: Collective-Evolution.com (excerpt)


humansarefree--2020-10-01--The Beginning of Religion: This is the Evolutionary Tree of All Religions on Earth

Since the dawn of mankind , humans have tried to make sense of their world , especially when faced with unknown phenomena such as ‘ what causes storms ’ , ‘ what happens to us after we die ’ , and ‘ how was the world formed ’ ?
It is plausible that from such questions , our first primitive religions were formed .
The earliest evidence of a religious practice can be traced back to 100,000 years ago when we began to bury our dead .
Although we can not define this as the origin of faith , it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ humanity , we had begun to consider some kind of afterlife .
Over time , this religious practice gave rise to a new ideology which spread across the continents , known today as ‘ Animism ’ .
This emerging faith was the root belief system that would evolve and branch out into numerous other ideologies all over the world .
The journey of these evolving religions can be broken down into three classic periods .
It should be noted that these periods are not indicative of a new ideology improving upon previous faith @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they go extinct , and they split into distinct traditions .
They adapt to their environment , they construct their environment in part , all just like organic evolution does .
Humans began to believe that natural constructs ( e.g .
plants , animals , rocks and wind ) possessed a spiritual essence .
These spirit entities were believed to have powers and temperaments that influenced our everyday world .
By worshiping these divine beings , it was believed we could maintain harmony with this spirit world and gain favors from them .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Epipaleolithic era .
Linguists and historians have defined a hypothetical language family called Nostratic , which seems to have influenced all the African and Eurasian dialects .
Many of the words that can be reconstructed involve nature gods ( such as mother earth and father sky ) .
This suggests that the nature spirits of animism had evolved into a new generation of Gods ( giving abstract beings of thunder and water a more human form ) .
During the Neolithic revolution , civilizations began to emerge requiring new areas of expertise @ @ @ @ @ @ @ agriculture , and commerce ) .
It was the descendants of the Nostratic Gods ( e.g .
the Indo-Europeans and Sumerians ) who took on the role of guide and leader to the civilized world .
Typically these divine beings were divided into several classes , overseeing the heavens , the mortal realm , and the underworld .
Each deity possessed their own powers , religious practice , and domain ( e.g .
trading , diplomacy , Warcraft etc ) .
Man could either worship one or all of these beings , gaining @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and even sacrifice .
In the Bronze Age , a new movement took shape that prioritized one God over all other deities .
This system is known as Monotheism – a belief in one Supreme Being .
In 1348 BCE , the pharaoh Akhenaten , raised a lesser known God called ‘ Aten ’ to supreme status , downplaying the role of all other Egyptian deities .
A little later in Iran , Zoroaster ( a Persian priest ) claimed ‘ Ahura Mazda ’ to be the one supreme deity .
This newly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had formed the known universe , and was totally self-sufficient , capable of ruling over all other domains .
This idea became prominent in Judaism , Christianity , Islam , and Sikhism .
Most monotheistic systems tend to be exclusive in nature , which meant the gods of the Old World had to be purged from man ’ s consciousness .
As a consequence , monotheistic religions displayed less religious tolerance than polytheistic religions , resulting in many wars and political disputes .

Since the dawn of mankind, humans have tried to make sense of their world, especially when faced with unknown phenomena such as ‘what causes storms’, ‘what happens to us after we die’, and ‘how was the world formed’?
by Simon E. Davies
It is plausible that from such questions, our first primitive religions were formed.
Click here to enlarge table (it will open in a new tab).
The earliest evidence of a religious practice can be traced back to 100,000 years ago when we began to bury our dead.
Although we cannot define this as the origin of faith, it does suggest that at the dawn of humanity, we had begun to consider some kind of afterlife.
Over time, this religious practice gave rise to a new ideology which spread across the continents, known today as ‘Animism’.
This emerging faith was the root belief system that would evolve and branch out into numerous other ideologies all over the world.
The journey of these evolving religions can be broken down into three classic periods.
It should be noted that these periods are not indicative of a new ideology improving upon previous faith systems.
Religions change over time, they go extinct, and they split into distinct traditions.
They adapt to their environment, they construct their environment in part, all just like organic evolution does.
Period 1: Animism (100,000 BCE – Present)
Humans began to believe that natural constructs (e.g. plants, animals, rocks and wind) possessed a spiritual essence.
These spirit entities were believed to have powers and temperaments that influenced our everyday world.
By worshiping these divine beings, it was believed we could maintain harmony with this spirit world and gain favors from them.
Period 2: Polytheism (15,000 BCE – Present)
The roots of Polytheism may lie in the Epipaleolithic era. Linguists and historians have defined a hypothetical language family called Nostratic, which seems to have influenced all the African and Eurasian dialects.
Many of the words that can be reconstructed involve nature gods (such as mother earth and father sky).
This suggests that the nature spirits of animism had evolved into a new generation of Gods (giving abstract beings of thunder and water a more human form).
During the Neolithic revolution, civilizations began to emerge requiring new areas of expertise (e.g. lawmaking, metallurgy, agriculture, and commerce).
It was the descendants of the Nostratic Gods (e.g. the Indo-Europeans and Sumerians) who took on the role of guide and leader to the civilized world.
Typically these divine beings were divided into several classes, overseeing the heavens, the mortal realm, and the underworld.
Each deity possessed their own powers, religious practice, and domain (e.g. trading, diplomacy, Warcraft etc). Man could either worship one or all of these beings, gaining favor from them via offerings, prayer and even sacrifice.
Period 3: Monotheism (1348 BCE – Present)
In the Bronze Age, a new movement took shape that prioritized one God over all other deities. This system is known as Monotheism – a belief in one Supreme Being.
In 1348 BCE, the pharaoh Akhenaten, raised a lesser known God called ‘Aten’ to supreme status, downplaying the role of all other Egyptian deities.
A little later in Iran, Zoroaster (a Persian priest) claimed ‘Ahura Mazda’ to be the one supreme deity.
This newly emerging system posited that one creator god had formed the known universe, and was totally self-sufficient, capable of ruling over all other domains.
This idea became prominent in Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and Sikhism.
Most monotheistic systems tend to be exclusive in nature, which meant the gods of the Old World had to be purged from man’s consciousness.
As a consequence, monotheistic religions displayed less religious tolerance than polytheistic religions, resulting in many wars and political disputes.


humansarefree--2020-10-01--UN’s Agenda 2030 is the Driving Force Behind COVID-19

UN Agenda 2030 is a global plan designed by the ruling class to gain centralized control over earth ’ s resources and populations under a one world government .
The plan existed for decades and is in full execution at breakneck speed since 2020 .
The goal of UN Agenda 2030 is to transform global society into a technocracy under the guise of sustainable development by 2030 .
The end result would be a high-tech slave system , impossible to escape , so let ’ s make sure it never comes to fruition .
COVID-19 plays an important role in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can understand how that works , we must first understand what UN Agenda 30 & technocracy is all about .
UN Agenda 30 has public , sugar-coated , deceptive propaganda on the website of United Nations , videos on YouTube etc .
The UN divided their plans in 17 parts which they call Sustainable Development Goals According to the propaganda , the agenda is all about creating a sustainable world , in balance with nature where there ’ s no hunger , equality , rainbows and unicorns basically .
In our hearts , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have it on condition we don ’ t hand over control on the matter to the ruling class .
Their social engineers are exploiting a desire the majority of us has .
United Nations is an intergovernmental organization .
All countries of the world are members and donate tax money to UN .
The SDGs trickle down hierarchically from UN , to federal governments , to local governments .
Meaning in all likelihood , your city and major are executing programs in context of SDGs .
The programs in your city might have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about sustainability and smart technology , it ’ s a SDG implementation .
Technocracy is the science of social engineering .
Definition from the technocrats themselves in magazine The Technocrats ’ Magazine .
A technocracy is a governance system where science dictates how society is organized .
The focus lies on resource management and population management on a global scale .
The entities that run such a system are technocrats : scientists , the ruling class and artificial intelligence .
Expert on the topic Patrick Wood explains what technocracy is and puts it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with Spiro Skouras : In a technocracy , all resources of the planet are hooked onto , and managed by , a control grid .
Resources include food , water , land , construction , animals and people .
Products and living beings can be tracked with microchips with Geo-location , RFID sensors and 5G .
Fluids , gas and electricity throughput can be counted with smart meters .
The smart grid knows exactly what , when , where and how much you use .
Your access to resources can be shut down @ @ @ @ @ @ @ harder to live self-sustainable and resource monopolization has been a reality for a long time .
Survival would depend on the whims of the state who controls the smart grid .
Your access to basic resources for survival could be cut off for not testing or vaccinating for COVID-19 or simply because you voice criticism against the state .
Population management is about tracking the population , controlling where people can go , which behavior is acceptable , tracking the population count and controlling who is allowed to reproduce ( eugenics ) .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ state .
Cameras and face detection play a vital role but also online behavior is monitored .
Punishments for behaviors deemed unsuitable to the technocrats would be automated , removing the human factor and negotiation from the equation .
The ruling class liked China ’ s digital dictatorship and social credit system and wishes to expand that model to the rest of the world .
To hook up man to the grid , man has to merge with machine , which means at some point , ( nano ) robotics would have to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ perfect candidate for this crime is the COVID-19 vaccine .
Let ’ s consolidate what we ’ ve learned before we move on .
• The ruling class is dead-set on transforming the world into a technocracy .
• UN agenda 2030 & COVID-19 are the tools to transform society to a technocracy .
• UN agenda 2030 is a facade for the public while a one world government technocracy is implemented .
With this in mind , let ’ s have a look at the targets the ruling class wishes to complete @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID-19 chaos .
The common thread in this list of targets is total control over mankind .
• Digital monetary system , cashless society – Connected to your identity and health records via blockchain .
• Wildlands project ( to “ restore wildlife ” ) – Remove people from rural areas .
Example : “ SDGs marked your land as a wildlife reserve .
Leave.
” – Move them into smart mega cities .
• Communitarianism : the ideology of ‘ the common good ’ – Community goals trump individual rights .
– @ @ @ @ @ @ @ & corporations .
– Dissidents will be outcasts .
The technocrats want a fully digital money system , linked to identity and health data via blockchain .
According to them , the best way to achieve that is to completely destroy the old system and introduce the new system .
The World Economic Form ( WEF ) has already come out publicly with ‘ the new ’ and calls it The Great Reset .
The first lockdown has already dealt a major blow to the middle class , self-employed , SMEs .
A @ @ @ @ @ @ @ completely wipe out the middle class .
Anyone who observes the media with open eyes sees that the second wave is planned on the basis of infections .
Infections are irrelevant because the PCR test is scientific fraud and because only the death toll is important .
An awake population will not accept a second lockdown .
Via the covid test the state is able to acquire the DNA of the population .
Via vaccination , the state can modify the DNA of the population and bring in nanorobotics .
If you hear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the UN ) talking , you can see that transhumanism is an important goal for them .
Such is the kind of people that are the driving force behind covid and vaccination .
Temperature measurements .
Contact tracing .
Resource access based on your health ( now masks , later COVI-PASS ) .
All sensitive practices that would never have been accepted without a “ health crisis ” .
The rollout of these agendas will meet resistance , requiring a tougher , more violent police force .
As long as the covid illusion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ behind the mantra for your safety .
Fundamental freedoms and basic rights are violated .
Now “ for your safety ” , after covid that ’ s the ” new normal ” .
It gives an idea of how long they want to hold on to the virus illusion .
They want to complete the agenda by 2030 .
A solution starts with a ( world ) population that realizes what is really going on .
It ’ s best to propagate that knowledge to friends and family in the police and army @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the people and not the corrupt governments and corporations .
Their children & family too will have to “ live ” in a high-tech prison state .
Ultimately , the people have the power .
United in truth and right action , this could be over in the blink of an eye .

UN Agenda 2030 is a global plan designed by the ruling class to gain centralized control over earth’s resources and populations under a one world government.
The plan existed for decades and is in full execution at breakneck speed since 2020.
The goal of UN Agenda 2030 is to transform global society into a technocracy under the guise of sustainable development by 2030.
The end result would be a high-tech slave system, impossible to escape, so let’s make sure it never comes to fruition.
COVID-19 plays an important role in pushing these agendas through. Before we can understand how that works, we must first understand what UN Agenda 30 & technocracy is all about.
UN Agenda 2030
Sustainable Development Goals
UN Agenda 30 has public, sugar-coated, deceptive propaganda on the website of United Nations, videos on YouTube etc. The UN divided their plans in 17 parts which they call Sustainable Development Goals
According to the propaganda, the agenda is all about creating a sustainable world, in balance with nature where there’s no hunger, equality, rainbows and unicorns basically.
In our hearts, we want this world and we can have it on condition we don’t hand over control on the matter to the ruling class. Their social engineers are exploiting a desire the majority of us has.
Local implementation
United Nations is an intergovernmental organization. All countries of the world are members and donate tax money to UN.
The SDGs trickle down hierarchically from UN, to federal governments, to local governments. Meaning in all likelihood, your city and major are executing programs in context of SDGs.
The programs in your city might have varying names but when it’s about sustainability and smart technology, it’s a SDG implementation.
Rosa Koire & independent journalist James Corbett explain the true motivations behind UN Agenda 2030:

Technocracy
Definition
Technocracy is the science of social engineering.
Definition from the technocrats themselves in magazine The Technocrats’ Magazine.
A technocracy is a governance system where science dictates how society is organized.
The focus lies on resource management and population management on a global scale. The entities that run such a system are technocrats: scientists, the ruling class and artificial intelligence.
Expert on the topic Patrick Wood explains what technocracy is and puts it in context with COVID-19 in an interview with Spiro Skouras:

Resource management
In a technocracy, all resources of the planet are hooked onto, and managed by, a control grid. Resources include food, water, land, construction, animals and people.
Products and living beings can be tracked with microchips with Geo-location, RFID sensors and 5G. Fluids, gas and electricity throughput can be counted with smart meters.
The smart grid knows exactly what, when, where and how much you use. Your access to resources can be shut down remotely. Meanwhile, governments make it harder to live self-sustainable and resource monopolization has been a reality for a long time.
Survival would depend on the whims of the state who controls the smart grid. Your access to basic resources for survival could be cut off for not testing or jjabing for COVID-19 or simply because you voice criticism against the state.
Population management
Population management is about tracking the population, controlling where people can go, which behavior is acceptable, tracking the population count and controlling who is allowed to reproduce (eugenics).
A technocracy is a high-tech surveillance prison state. Cameras and face detection play a vital role but also online behavior is monitored.
Punishments for behaviors deemed unsuitable to the technocrats would be automated, removing the human factor and negotiation from the equation.
The ruling class liked China’s digital dictatorship and social credit system and wishes to expand that model to the rest of the world.
To hook up man to the grid, man has to merge with machine, which means at some point, (nano)robotics would have to be inserted into the body. The perfect candidate for this crime is the COVID-19 jjab.
Targets
Let’s consolidate what we’ve learned before we move on.
The ruling class is dead-set on transforming the world into a technocracy.
UN agenda 2030 & COVID-19 are the tools to transform society to a technocracy.
UN agenda 2030 is a facade for the public while a one world government technocracy is implemented.
With this in mind, let’s have a look at the targets the ruling class wishes to complete while the world is occupied with the COVID-19 chaos. The common thread in this list of targets is total control over mankind.
Digital identity: ID2020
Digital health card: COVI-PASS
Digital monetary system, cashless society
– Connected to your identity and health records via blockchain.
– Connected to your identity and health records via blockchain. jjabing
– Merge man with machine
– Depopulation
– Merge man with machine – Depopulation AI
– Resource control
– Population control
– Resource control – Population control Smart cities
– Facial recognition cameras
– Digital access control
– 5G
– Smart meters
– Self-driving cars
– Facial recognition cameras – Digital access control – 5G – Smart meters – Self-driving cars Gobal totalitarian police state
Wildlands project (to “restore wildlife”)
– Remove people from rural areas.
Example: “SDGs marked your land as a wildlife reserve. Leave.”
– Move them into smart mega cities.
– Remove people from rural areas. Example: “SDGs marked your land as a wildlife reserve. Leave.” – Move them into smart mega cities. No private property
– Land, house
– Business
– Your body
– Mandatory vaccination
– Masks
– Land, house – Business – Your body – Mandatory vaccination – Masks Communitarianism: the ideology of ‘the common good’
– Community goals trump individual rights.
– Community “interests” dictated by governments & corporations.
– Dissidents will be outcasts.
Destroy the economy
The Great Reset (World Economic Forum)
The technocrats want a fully digital money system, linked to identity and health data via blockchain.
According to them, the best way to achieve that is to completely destroy the old system and introduce the new system.
The World Economic Form (WEF) has already come out publicly with ‘the new’ and calls it The Great Reset.
Spiro Skouras covers WEF’s The Great Reset:

Destroying the middle class
The first lockdown has already dealt a major blow to the middle class, self-employed, SMEs.
A second, longer, tougher lockdown will completely wipe out the middle class. Anyone who observes the media with open eyes sees that the second wave is planned on the basis of infections.
Infections are irrelevant because the PCR test is scientific fraud and because only the death toll is important.
An awake population will not accept a second lockdown.
Collection of DNA, vaccination and transhumanism
Via the covid test the state is able to acquire the DNA of the population.
Via vaccination, the state can modify the DNA of the population and bring in nanorobotics.
If you hear the people of WEF (partner of the UN) talking, you can see that transhumanism is an important goal for them. Such is the kind of people that are the driving force behind covid and vaccination.
High-tech surveillance
Face recognition to”monitor that you’re wearing your slave mask”. Attendance registration.
Temperature measurements. Contact tracing. Resource access based on your health (now masks, later COVI-PASS).
All sensitive practices that would never have been accepted without a “health crisis”.
Police state
The rollout of these agendas will meet resistance, requiring a tougher, more violent police force. As long as the covid illusion persists, the police can always hide behind the mantra for your safety.
Destroy fundamental rights
Fundamental freedoms and basic rights are violated. Now “for your safety”, after covid that’s the”new normal”.
It gives an idea of how long they want to hold on to the virus illusion. They want to complete the agenda by 2030.
Solutions
A solution starts with a (world) population that realizes what is really going on.
It’s best to propagate that knowledge to friends and family in the police and army too, as they have to support the people and not the corrupt governments and corporations.
Their children & family too will have to “live” in a high-tech prison state.
Ultimately, the people have the power. United in truth and right action, this could be over in the blink of an eye.
Source: WickedTruths.org


humansarefree--2020-10-01--Belgian Health Experts Demand Full Investigation Into WHO for Faking COVID-19 Pandemic

A coalition of doctors and other health professionals in Belgium has issued an open letter calling for an immediate end to every “ emergency ” policy established in response to the Wuhan coronavirus ( covid-19 ) , as well as a full-scale investigation into the World Health Organization ( WHO ) for allegedly faking a pandemic .
Citing a complete lack of “ medical justification ” for the continued lockdowns and mandatory mask-wearing , the coalition says an open debate is needed to allow all experts with varying perspectives the chance to be represented and have their voices heard , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to remain in isolation while prohibiting them from engaging in normal commerce , traveling freely , and even going to work , the letter ’ s signers warn , is having a greater negative impact both in the short and long term than if there were no restrictions at all – which is why it all needs to end immediately .
German Doctors On COVID-19 : ‘ We Have A Lot Of Evidence That It ’ s A Fake Story All Over The World ’ In Belgium , at least , health authorities @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it not for the misguidance of the WHO .
The Belgian Supreme Health Council ( BSHC ) normally takes a minimalist approach , meaning it encourages people to adopt a healthy lifestyle that works for them , rather than try to force them to abide by some one-size-fits-all government prescription such as the one that came down the pipeline from the WHO .
Furthermore , the latest science does not even support the WHO ’ s approach , which is hurting people more than it is helping them .
“ After the initial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now show a completely different picture – there is no medical justification for any emergency policy anymore , ” the letter reads .
“ The current crisis management has become totally disproportionate and causes more damage than it does any good , ” it goes on to explain .
“ We call for an end to all measures and ask for an immediate restoration of our normal democratic governance and legal structures and of all our civil liberties.
” Having to get vaccinated for the Wuhan coronavirus ( covid-19 ) is another draconian @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with it permanent health consequences , seeing as how there is no way to effectively detoxify from an mRNA vaccine .
To learn more , check out the following episode of The Health Ranger Report : Strict covid-19 restrictions violate the WHO ’ s own definition of health Back in 1948 , the WHO defined health as follows : “ Health is a state of complete physical , mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or other physical impairment.
” According to the letter ’ s signers , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ SARS-CoV-2 is a clear violation of this long-established ethic because it impinges upon the emotional and social well-being of humans , all in the name of keeping them “ safe ” from a virus .
Forcing people to stay at home muzzled with no human contact is also a violation of basic human rights , as is demanding that people “ mask up ” whenever they decide to venture from their own property – especially since being social actually protects against viral infection .
“ Studies have shown that the more social and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ resistant they are to viruses , ” the letter explains .
“ It is much more likely that isolation and quarantine have fatal consequences .
“ Fear , persistent stress and loneliness induced by social distancing have a proven negative influence on psychological and general health , ” it adds .
Remember when “ flatten the curve ” was only supposed to last two weeks ?
Early on , the WHO warned that if the world failed to “ flatten the curve , ” up to 3.4 percent of people who contracted the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This process was supposed to take just two weeks , as you may recall , but still persists six months later .
The world was also told by the WHO , which has proven ties to the vaccine industry , by the way , that the spread of the Wuhan coronavirus ( covid-19 ) would lead to an abnormal pattern of seasonal infection , another claim that has since been proven false by science .
“ The course of covid-19 followed the course of a normal wave of infection similar to a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ As every year , we see a mix of flu viruses following the curve : first the rhinoviruses , then the influenza A and B viruses , followed by the coronaviruses .
There is nothing different from what we normally see.
” So what we continue to face is a “ cure ” that is far , far worse than the “ problem , ” the letter contends .
Furthermore , flawed testing , fake science , and widespread ignorance about how the human immune system even works are keeping us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ collective detriment .
The full open letter can be read in its entirety at this link .

A coalition of doctors and other health professionals in Belgium has issued an open letter calling for an immediate end to every “emergency” policy established in response to the Wuhan coronavirus (covid-19), as well as a full-scale investigation into the World Health Organization (WHO) for allegedly faking a pandemic.
Citing a complete lack of “medical justification” for the continued lockdowns and mandatory mask-wearing, the coalition says an open debate is needed to allow all experts with varying perspectives the chance to be represented and have their voices heard, without censorship or retribution.
Forcing people to remain in isolation while prohibiting them from engaging in normal commerce, traveling freely, and even going to work, the letter’s signers warn, is having a greater negative impact both in the short and long term than if there were no restrictions at all – which is why it all needs to end immediately.
German Doctors On COVID-19: ‘We Have A Lot Of Evidence That It’s A Fake Story All Over The World’
In Belgium, at least, health authorities never would have imposed such restrictions were it not for the misguidance of the WHO.
The Belgian Supreme Health Council (BSHC) normally takes a minimalist approach, meaning it encourages people to adopt a healthy lifestyle that works for them, rather than try to force them to abide by some one-size-fits-all government prescription such as the one that came down the pipeline from the WHO.
Furthermore, the latest science does not even support the WHO’s approach, which is hurting people more than it is helping them.
“After the initial panic surrounding covid-19, the objective facts now show a completely different picture – there is no medical justification for any emergency policy anymore,” the letter reads.
“The current crisis management has become totally disproportionate and causes more damage than it does any good,” it goes on to explain.
“We call for an end to all measures and ask for an immediate restoration of our normal democratic governance and legal structures and of all our civil liberties.”
Having to get vaccinated for the Wuhan coronavirus (covid-19) is another draconian imposition coming down the pike that carries with it permanent health consequences, seeing as how there is no way to effectively detoxify from an mRNA jjab. To learn more, check out the following episode of The Health Ranger Report:
Strict covid-19 restrictions violate the WHO’s own definition of health
Back in 1948, the WHO defined health as follows:
“Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or other physical impairment.”
According to the letter’s signers, the WHO’s current approach to combating SARS-CoV-2 is a clear violation of this long-established ethic because it impinges upon the emotional and social well-being of humans, all in the name of keeping them “safe” from a virus.
Forcing people to stay at home muzzled with no human contact is also a violation of basic human rights, as is demanding that people “mask up” whenever they decide to venture from their own property – especially since being social actually protects against viral infection.
“Studies have shown that the more social and emotional commitments people have, the more resistant they are to viruses,” the letter explains.
“It is much more likely that isolation and quarantine have fatal consequences.
“Fear, persistent stress and loneliness induced by social distancing have a proven negative influence on psychological and general health,” it adds.
Remember when “flatten the curve” was only supposed to last two weeks?
Early on, the WHO warned that if the world failed to “flatten the curve,” up to 3.4 percent of people who contracted the Wuhan coronavirus (covid-19) would die.
This process was supposed to take just two weeks, as you may recall, but still persists six months later.
The world was also told by the WHO, which has proven ties to the jjab industry, by the way, that the spread of the Wuhan coronavirus (covid-19) would lead to an abnormal pattern of seasonal infection, another claim that has since been proven false by science.
“The course of covid-19 followed the course of a normal wave of infection similar to a flu season,” the letter explains.
“As every year, we see a mix of flu viruses following the curve: first the rhinoviruses, then the influenza A and B viruses, followed by the coronaviruses. There is nothing different from what we normally see.”
So what we continue to face is a “cure” that is far, far worse than the “problem,” the letter contends.
Furthermore, flawed testing, fake science, and widespread ignorance about how the human immune system even works are keeping us under medical tyranny, to our own collective detriment.
The full open letter can be read in its entirety at this link.
By Ethan Huff, Guest writer


humansarefree--2020-10-01--We Are Becoming the Pod People

We Are Becoming the Pod People

Clearly , the COVID “ pandemic ” is not intended to be a passing emergency but a ruse to impose a “ new normal ” corresponding to the UN ’ s Agenda 2030 .
The dystopian future is taking shape .
Mass gatherings have been canceled .
We must experience the world on a TV screen .
The NFL plays in front of a cardboard crowd to sound effects .
Millions are stuck at home , working “ remotely , ” or paid to do nothing .
( Will they ever agree to work again ? )
Restaurants and other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Students are deprived of the society of their peers , forced to take their courses online .
Many are confined to their dorms without proper provisions .
Everyone is required to wear filthy masks .
Locally , the Royal Winnipeg Ballet canceled their annual Nutcracker ballet , scheduled for Christmas .
Imagine hundreds of artists out of jobs .
There is talk that Christmas gatherings may be canceled .
Every source of solace or happiness is being shut down .
At the local Safeway , the lounge where old folk enjoyed their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ They have nowhere to go .
Montreal residents won ’ t be allowed to visit friends or family at home for most of October or eat out at their favorite restaurant as the provincial government struggles to slow the surge of new coronavirus cases .
All bars , casinos , and restaurants are closed ( takeout only ) .
Libraries , museums , cinemas , and theatres will also be closed .
Being less than two meters apart will be prohibited .
Masks will be mandatory during demonstrations .
Houses of worship and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and weddings , will have a 25-person limit .
Hair salons , hotels , and other such businesses will stay open .
Schools will remain open.
” For 16 million people in Northeast England , pubs and restaurants can stay open , but it will be illegal to go for a drink with a member of another household or visit them at their home .
Roughly 100 students at the University of Western Ontario were referred for investigation under the school ’ s code of conduct after campus police broke up parties in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ At the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa , with at least 1,889 virus cases since mid-August , and at the University of Notre Dame , with about 550 cases , students have reported their classmates for violating quarantine and wandering outside.
” Our social lives have moved to Facebook .
The economy is tilting to cabin fever .
Home exercise programs and food delivery are thriving .
Amazon stock is soaring .
Meanwhile , Main Street is boarded up .
“ The housebound are nimbly pivoting to virtual social gatherings , ” The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re holding birthday parties and bar mitzvahs over video chat , broadcasting D.J .
sets and streaming concerts ( some from the luxurious confines of celebrity homes ) , and establishing quarantine movie nights on Twitter for “ virtual companionship.
” A lot of communal events are taking place on Zoom , a videoconferencing app now being used by many classrooms and businesses ( thus transforming it into one of the few companies doing well on the stock market ) .
But it ’ s not just Zoom .
There are , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vocal number of people gathering in the digital plazas , pet stores , and pizza shops of Club Penguin Online .
There are happy hours being held on Google Hangout , and poker games taking place over FaceTime .
There are flute meditation sessions on Instagram and thousands of people participating in dance raves that are broadcast on Twitch .
It ’ s a lot for the internet .
On Monday , Discord , the chat app popular with gamers , announced that it would increase its capacity by 20 percent to keep @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thereafter.
” The plan is to dehumanize us in advance of full-blown tyranny .
The scary part is that the masses still think the “ authorities ” have their best interests at heart .
The medical profession , media , and politicians are all taking their orders from the Rockefellers .
This psyop is an egregious betrayal of trust from which society will not recover unless the traitors are all sent packing .
All we can do is refuse to become “ pod people .
”

Clearly, the COVID “pandemic” is not intended to be a passing emergency but a ruse to impose a “new normal” corresponding to the UN’s Agenda 2030.
by Henry Makow PhD
The dystopian future is taking shape. Mass gatherings have been canceled. We must experience the world on a TV screen. The NFL plays in front of a cardboard crowd to sound effects.
Millions are stuck at home, working “remotely,” or paid to do nothing. (Will they ever agree to work again?)
Restaurants and other businesses in urban centers are going bust.
Students are deprived of the society of their peers, forced to take their courses online. Many are confined to their dorms without proper provisions.
Everyone is required to wear filthy masks.
Locally, the Royal Winnipeg Ballet canceled their annual Nutcracker ballet, scheduled for Christmas. Imagine hundreds of artists out of jobs.
There is talk that Christmas gatherings may be canceled. Every source of solace or happiness is being shut down.
At the local Safeway, the lounge where old folk enjoyed their Timbits and coffee has been closed. They have nowhere to go.
Montreal residents won’t be allowed to visit friends or family at home for most of October or eat out at their favorite restaurant as the provincial government struggles to slow the surge of new coronavirus cases.
All bars, casinos, and restaurants are closed (takeout only). Libraries, museums, cinemas, and theatres will also be closed. Being less than two meters apart will be prohibited.
Masks will be mandatory during demonstrations. Houses of worship and venues for events, such as funerals and weddings, will have a 25-person limit. Hair salons, hotels, and other such businesses will stay open. Schools will remain open.”
For 16 million people in Northeast England, pubs and restaurants can stay open, but it will be illegal to go for a drink with a member of another household or visit them at their home.
Roughly 100 students at the University of Western Ontario were referred for investigation under the school’s code of conduct after campus police broke up parties in university residences on the weekend.
“At the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, with at least 1,889 virus cases since mid-August, and at the University of Notre Dame, with about 550 cases, students have reported their classmates for violating quarantine and wandering outside.”
Our social lives have moved to Facebook.
We’re being reengineered.
The economy is tilting to cabin fever. Home exercise programs and food delivery are thriving. Amazon stock is soaring.
Meanwhile, Main Street is boarded up.
“The housebound are nimbly pivoting to virtual social gatherings,” The New York Times reports.
“They’re holding birthday parties and bar mitzvahs over video chat, broadcasting D.J. sets and streaming concerts (some from the luxurious confines of celebrity homes), and establishing quarantine movie nights on Twitter for “virtual companionship.”
A lot of communal events are taking place on Zoom, a videoconferencing app now being used by many classrooms and businesses (thus transforming it into one of the few companies doing well on the stock market). But it’s not just Zoom.
There are, for example, a small but highly vocal number of people gathering in the digital plazas, pet stores, and pizza shops of Club Penguin Online.
There are happy hours being held on Google Hangout, and poker games taking place over FaceTime.
There are flute meditation sessions on Instagram and thousands of people participating in dance raves that are broadcast on Twitch.
It’s a lot for the internet. On Monday, Discord, the chat app popular with gamers, announced that it would increase its capacity by 20 percent to keep up with demand; it crashed shortly thereafter.”
Conclusion
The plan is to dehumanize us in advance of full-blown tyranny. The scary part is that the masses still think the “authorities” have their best interests at heart.
The medical profession, media, and politicians are all taking their orders from the Rockefellers.
This psyop is an egregious betrayal of trust from which society will not recover unless the traitors are all sent packing.
All we can do is refuse to become “pod people.”


humansarefree--2020-10-01--Breaking: Ex-Pfizer Exec Says ‘Pandemic is Over,’ & So-Called ‘Second Wave’ Based on Fraudulent Test

Breaking: Ex-Pfizer Exec Says ‘Pandemic is Over,’ & So-Called ‘Second Wave’ Based on Fraudulent Testing

Despite claims by Anthony Fauci and others that Americans should brace for a “ second wave ” of the Wuhan coronavirus ( covid-19 ) , former Pfizer Chief Science Officer Dr. Mike Yeadon says this is nothing but fear-mongering based on junk science and fraud .
A former vice president at the pharmaceutical giant , Dr. Yeadon claims that “ almost all ” of the tests being conducted for the Wuhan coronavirus ( covid-19 ) are “ false positives , ” a phenomenon that has already been observed in Florida .
Dr. Yeadon also says that “ there is no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ happen.
” Any “ second wave ” that comes along is completely manufactured based on fake “ new cases , ” Dr. Yeadon is further quoted as saying , responding in the affirmative when asked if “ we are basing a government policy , an economic policy , a civil liberties policy , in terms of limiting people to six persons in a meeting … all based on what may well be completely fake data.
” “ Were it not for the test data that you get from the TV all the time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pandemic was over , as nothing much has happened , ” Dr. Yeadon further stated , noting that more people will probably be admitted to hospitals for influenza in the coming months , but that these should not be mistaken as Wuhan coronavirus ( covid-19 ) admissions .
Be sure to check out the following video from Brighteon.com in which Dr. Yeadon talks to interviewer Julia Hartley-Brewer about the truth concerning the Wuhan coronavirus ( covid-19 ) plandemic : Dr. Yeadon published a paper suggesting that the “ curve ” was “ flattened @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dr. Yeadon and his colleagues published a paper they co-authored about the so-called “ pandemic.
” Entitled , “ How Likely is a Second Wave ?
” this paper explains that most of the deaths associated with the Wuhan coronavirus ( covid-19 ) occurred back in March and April , and quickly tapered off in the months that followed .
By April , most countries , including the U.S. , had successfully “ flattened the curve , ” though increased testing , most of which is fraudulent , continues to report new “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ continued pandemic restrictions are using as “ evidence ” to push for endless mask-wearing , physical distancing and in some cases , lockdowns .
“ It has widely been observed that in all heavily infected countries in Europe and several of the U.S. states likewise , that the shape of the daily deaths vs. time curves is similar to ours in the U.K. , ” this paper reveals .
“ Many of these curves are not just similar , but almost super imposable.
” This is further reflected in the latest survival figures @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have risen to 99.8 percent of infections – meaning only 0.2 percent of people who test positive for the Wuhan coronavirus ( covid-19 ) end up dying at some point after being “ diagnosed.
” This 99.8 percent survival rate is significantly higher than the one proposed by Fauci back in March and April when he falsely claimed that upwards of 6 percent of Wuhan coronavirus ( covid-19 ) patients would die from the virus – meaning Fauci incorrectly claimed that the novel virus was 20 to 30 times more deadly than it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Rate ( IFR ) value accepted by Yeadon et al in the paper is .26 % , ” writes Ralph Lopez for HubPages .
“ The survival rate of a disease is 100 % minus the IFR.
” Concerning the allegedly “ novel ” nature of the Wuhan coronavirus ( covid-19 ) , Dr. Yeadon claims that it is only novel in the sense that it is a new type of coronavirus .
As it turns out , there are many other types of coronaviruses in existence , including four other strains that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you read this .
“ They all have striking sequence similarity to the new coronavirus , ” Dr. Yeadon points out in his paper , offering a different perspective that is rarely , if ever , mentioned by the mainstream media .

Despite claims by Anthony Fauci and others that Americans should brace for a “second wave” of the Wuhan coronavirus (covid-19), former Pfizer Chief Science Officer Dr. Mike Yeadon says this is nothing but fear-mongering based on junk science and fraud.
A former vice president at the pharmaceutical giant, Dr. Yeadon claims that “almost all” of the tests being conducted for the Wuhan coronavirus (covid-19) are “false positives,” a phenomenon that has already been observed in Florida.
Dr. Yeadon also says that “there is no science to suggest a second wave should happen.”
Any “second wave” that comes along is completely manufactured based on fake “new cases,” Dr. Yeadon is further quoted as saying, responding in the affirmative when asked if “we are basing a government policy, an economic policy, a civil liberties policy, in terms of limiting people to six persons in a meeting … all based on what may well be completely fake data.”
“Were it not for the test data that you get from the TV all the time, you would rightly conclude that the pandemic was over, as nothing much has happened,” Dr. Yeadon further stated, noting that more people will probably be admitted to hospitals for influenza in the coming months, but that these should not be mistaken as Wuhan coronavirus (covid-19) admissions.
Be sure to check out the following video from Brighteon.com in which Dr. Yeadon talks to interviewer Julia Hartley-Brewer about the truth concerning the Wuhan coronavirus (covid-19) plandemic:

Dr. Yeadon published a paper suggesting that the “curve” was “flattened” months ago
Earlier this month, Dr. Yeadon and his colleagues published a paper they co-authored about the so-called “pandemic.”
Entitled, “How Likely is a Second Wave?” this paper explains that most of the deaths associated with the Wuhan coronavirus (covid-19) occurred back in March and April, and quickly tapered off in the months that followed.
By April, most countries, including the U.S., had successfully “flattened the curve,” though increased testing, most of which is fraudulent, continues to report new “cases” that those in favor of continued pandemic restrictions are using as “evidence” to push for endless mask-wearing, physical distancing and in some cases, lockdowns.
“It has widely been observed that in all heavily infected countries in Europe and several of the U.S. states likewise, that the shape of the daily deaths vs. time curves is similar to ours in the U.K.,” this paper reveals.
“Many of these curves are not just similar, but almost super imposable.”
This is further reflected in the latest survival figures, which since the month of May have risen to 99.8 percent of infections – meaning only 0.2 percent of people who test positive for the Wuhan coronavirus (covid-19) end up dying at some point after being “diagnosed.”
This 99.8 percent survival rate is significantly higher than the one proposed by Fauci back in March and April when he falsely claimed that upwards of 6 percent of Wuhan coronavirus (covid-19) patients would die from the virus – meaning Fauci incorrectly claimed that the novel virus was 20 to 30 times more deadly than it actually is.
“The Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) value accepted by Yeadon et al in the paper is .26%,” writes Ralph Lopez for HubPages. “The survival rate of a disease is 100% minus the IFR.”
Concerning the allegedly “novel” nature of the Wuhan coronavirus (covid-19), Dr. Yeadon claims that it is only novel in the sense that it is a new type of coronavirus.
As it turns out, there are many other types of coronaviruses in existence, including four other strains that are freely circulating throughout the population as you read this.
“They all have striking sequence similarity to the new coronavirus,” Dr. Yeadon points out in his paper, offering a different perspective that is rarely, if ever, mentioned by the mainstream media.
Sources: Clearnewswire.com; Brighteon.com