humansarefree--2020-11-01--Rudy Giuliani: ‘Jack Dorsey [Twitter] is Covering Up Child Pornography’

During a recent appearance on “ America This Week ” with Eric Bolling , Rudy Giuliani went on a tirade over Twitter ’ s censorship of the HunterGate bombshells .
Seeing as how Twitter has no problem with people sharing the Borat prank story , Giuliani wants to know why the Biden Crime Family ’ s treasonous behavior is off-limits on the social media platform .
“ I think Jack Dorsey is covering up child pornography , ” Giuliani declared as the only possible explanation for why Twitter refuses to allow information about HunterGate to be shared .
“ This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ story .
It ’ s completely un-American .
It ’ s inconsistent with everything we were founded to be.
” Giuliani went on to compare Dorsey ’ s treatment of HunterGate to the Japanese internment camps of old , “ except it ’ s being done to all of us , ” he says .
You can watch the full segment with Bolling and Giuliani below : Even if Dorsey is not guilty of harboring child pornography and those who create and spread it on his platform , Giuliani is sure that Dorsey @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the imagination .
“ He ’ s something else , ” Giuliani contends .
“ Maybe he ’ s working for the Chinese , I don ’ t know .
But you don ’ t cut down information like this .
He has no right to say this is not valid.
” Seeing as how the emails and recordings of Hunter and his associates speak for themselves , Dorsey has no excuse for why he is keeping this information from the public , which desperately needs to know the truth before the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s in the man ’ s own voice !
” Giuliani further barked .
“ Hunter Biden is telling you he and his father are partners with a Chinese spy chief !
” Censoring HunterGate is a form of collusion with the enemy that ironically substantiates everything the left has been whining about for the past four years concerning President Trump , except the allegations are true about the left , not Trump .
“ What the media has done with the Hunter Biden story is the most blatant abuse of power and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and I ’ ve been around for a good while , y ’ all , ” writes Fred T. for The Right Scoop .
“ Does Rudy Giuliani seem angry , livid , even ENRAGED AND SPITTLE-FLINGING FLIPPING OUT to you ?
” Fred further writes .
“ Good .
That ’ s justified.
” The system is broken , and will probably never be fixed Like many of us , Giuliani is clearly fed up with the way the mainstream media and social media alike are covering for the Biden Crime @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of their scandals .
The systemic injustice within our nation ’ s top law enforcement agencies is also apparently chipping away at Giuliani ’ s sanity , even as this same system goes after President Trump and his associates for made-up conspiracy theories like Russian collusion .
Could it all just be a circus act ?
Perhaps .
In any case , the system is clearly broken as high-level criminals are still roaming free while We the People face “ second wave ” lockdowns and other plandemic restrictions .
“ I ’ m @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and pony show being put on by those like Sen. Cruz , as if that is supposed to keep me in line and thankful for their ‘ put down ’ of these tech company executives , ” one Right Scoop commenter noted .
“ The politicians are all reading from the same script , ” wrote another , suggesting that the left-wing and right-wing are attached to the same bird .
“ In the end , total domination of the citizens is good for both parties .
”

by Ethan Huff
During a recent appearance on “America This Week” with Eric Bolling, Rudy Giuliani went on a tirade over Twitter’s censorship of the HunterGate bombshells.
Seeing as how Twitter has no problem with people sharing the Borat prank story, Giuliani wants to know why the Biden Crime Family’s treasonous behavior is off-limits on the social media platform.
“I think Jack Dorsey is covering up child pornography,” Giuliani declared as the only possible explanation for why Twitter refuses to allow information about HunterGate to be shared.
“This is completely unjustifiable not to cover this story. It’s completely un-American. It’s inconsistent with everything we were founded to be.”
Giuliani went on to compare Dorsey’s treatment of HunterGate to the Japanese internment camps of old, “except it’s being done to all of us,” he says.
“This is outrageous what they’re doing,” Giuliani lamented.
You can watch the full segment with Bolling and Giuliani below:
Censoring HunterGate means colluding with America’s enemies
Even if Dorsey is not guilty of harboring child pornography and those who create and spread it on his platform, Giuliani is sure that Dorsey is not an American by any stretch of the imagination.
“He’s something else,” Giuliani contends. “Maybe he’s working for the Chinese, I don’t know. But you don’t cut down information like this. He has no right to say this is not valid.”
Seeing as how the emails and recordings of Hunter and his associates speak for themselves, Dorsey has no excuse for why he is keeping this information from the public, which desperately needs to know the truth before the Nov. 3 election.
“It’s in the man’s own voice!” Giuliani further barked. “Hunter Biden is telling you he and his father are partners with a Chinese spy chief!”
Censoring HunterGate is a form of collusion with the enemy that ironically substantiates everything the left has been whining about for the past four years concerning President Trump, except the allegations are true about the left, not Trump.
“What the media has done with the Hunter Biden story is the most blatant abuse of power and in-the-open collusion I’ve ever seen, and I’ve been around for a good while, y’all,” writes Fred T. for The Right Scoop.
“Does Rudy Giuliani seem angry, livid, even ENRAGED AND SPITTLE-FLINGING FLIPPING OUT to you?” Fred further writes. “Good. That’s justified.”
The system is broken, and will probably never be fixed
Like many of us, Giuliani is clearly fed up with the way the mainstream media and social media alike are covering for the Biden Crime Family by refusing to report on any of their scandals.
The systemic injustice within our nation’s top law enforcement agencies is also apparently chipping away at Giuliani’s sanity, even as this same system goes after President Trump and his associates for made-up conspiracy theories like Russian collusion.
Could it all just be a circus act? Perhaps. In any case, the system is clearly broken as high-level criminals are still roaming free while We the People face “second wave” lockdowns and other plandemic restrictions.
“I’m at my wits end with the dog and pony show being put on by those like Sen. Cruz, as if that is supposed to keep me in line and thankful for their ‘put down’ of these tech company executives,” one Right Scoop commenter noted.
“The politicians are all reading from the same script,” wrote another, suggesting that the left-wing and right-wing are attached to the same bird. “In the end, total domination of the citizens is good for both parties.”


humansarefree--2020-11-01--Nanotech Agenda Being Forwarded by Operation Coronavirus

The nanotech agenda – involving the placement of tiny sensors , devices and machines measured in nanometers inside the human body – is receiving a boost from the current fake pandemic which I have labeled Operation Coronavirus .
My earlier article Hydrogel Biosensor : Implantable Nanotech to be Used in COVID Vaccines ?
discussed the possibility that the coming COVID vaccines may incorporate nanotechnology funded by DARPA called hydrogel , a biosensor which would monitor your body as well as send and receive information to the 5G Smart Grid .
However there is much , much more to the story @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been planning this scamdemic for decades , but also have been planning the nanotech agenda for a long time too ; now , with the advent of COVID , the two agendas are merging , with sinister implications for humanity .
This article will take a closer look at the nanotech agenda and the current state of nanotechnology inside existing products such as vaccines .
The agenda is already far more advanced than many people realize .
A 2008 research paper entitled Nanorobot Hardware Architecture for Medical Defense analyzes in fine detail how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ used to for various purposes such as “ medical defense ” and “ epidemic control.
” It states that it provides details on an “ integrated platform and hardware architecture for nanorobots application in epidemic control , which should enable real time in vivo prognosis of biohazard infection.
” The idea is to place nanotech inside our bodies which communicates in real time with the Smart Grid ( powered by 5G ) to provide intimate information to the authorities about us .
Wayne from Alchemical Tech Revolution does a great commentary here .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ : “ Normally , for areas in public calamity or conflict zones , the absence of drinking water , any sort of fuel , electricity , and the lack of towers for network communication , including cable and wireless telephony , is a constant .
“ In such a situation , the available infrastructure is far from ideal to enable a large scale medical laboratory with precise and fast analysis .
For such aspect , nanorobots integrated with nanobiosensors can help to transmit real time information , using international mobile phones for wireless @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In fact , nanorobots should mean an efficient and powerful clinical device to provide precious biomedical monitoring , both for soldiers as for civilian population.
” Notice how they admit that there is dual use ( for military and civilians ) which usually connotes a weapons system with another use .
In this case , they are disguising the deeper purpose ( embedded surveillance ) with the superficial purpose ( a medical application ) : “ Taking from the moment of infection , some contagious diseases may show the first symptoms after hours @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , like years or even decades .
It means , for example , that when the public authorities noticed the infection from a contaminated person , showing external symptoms , a virus had enough time to spread itself through a circle of friends and workmates of the infected victim .
“ Meantime , those mates were adversely driving the virus forward , and had started a catastrophic chain circle .
The use of nanorobots with embedded nanodevices for real time epidemic control , as lab on a chip , can be useful to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The above quote hypes the danger of contagion , and specifically a virus , as a reason for you to willingly submit to the nanotech agenda and get embedded with nanotechnology .
It appeals to the concepts of contagion and germ theory , however especially since the COVID scamdemic began , a number of brave independent researchers and doctors are questioning these ideas , which reinforce the current Medical Industry ’ s business model of petrochemical pills and vaccines .
“ We implemented a system simulation and architecture of nanorobots for sensing the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ signals .
“ Actual advances in wireless technologies , nanoelectronics devices , and their use in the implementation of nanorobots applied to epidemic control , illustrate what upcoming technologies can enable in terms of real time health monitoring .
The approach for in vivo monitoring chemical concentrations should also apply to other.
” As Wayne says , this stuff is next level contact tracing .
Forget an app on your phone ; the plan is for in vivo ( taking place in a living organism ) surveillance .
There are many significant quotes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one last one : “ Frequencies ranging from 1 to 20MHz can be successfully used for biomedical applications without any damage.
” Is the implication that there could be damage if frequencies are higher than 20MHz , such as in the 30-100 GHz range of 5G ?
The nanotech invasion is already here .
It ’ s not a question of “ will they place nanotech in vaccines ” since they already have .
This 2017 Italian study entitled New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines : Micro- and Nanocontamination details an astonishing array of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of lead , cadmium , cerium , iron , titanium , nickel , zirconium , hafnium , strontium , tungsten , gold , silver , platinum , antimony , bismuth and aluminum .
The study ( which analyzes 44 types of 15 traditional vaccines ) states that these contaminants are “ non biodegradable and non biocompatible ” , that their inclusion is “ not declared ” and that their presence is “ inexplicable.
” It gives the benefit of the doubt to Big Pharma and its controllers when it concludes that “ our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , since it is probably due to polluted components or procedures of industrial processes ( e.g .
filtrations ) used to produce vaccines , not investigated and not detected by the Producers .
If our hypothesis is actually the case , a close inspection of the working places and the full knowledge of the whole procedure of vaccine preparation would probably allow to eliminate the problem.
” Knowing the background of the human microchipping and nanotech agenda , I would suggest there is another way to see things .
The study reveals how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in negative ways and cause harmful effects : “ … investigations revealed that some particles are embedded in a biological substrate , probably proteins , endo-toxins and residues of bacteria .
As soon as a particle comes in contact with proteic fluids , a nano-bio-interaction occurs and a “ protein corona ” is formed .
“ The nano-bio-interaction generates a bigger-sized compound that is not biodegradable and can induce adverse effects , since it is not recognized as self by the body .
Figure 5a-5f show examples of these nano-bio-interactions .
Aggregates can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ containing particles of Lead in Meningitec , of stainless steel ( Iron , Chromium and Nickel ) and of Copper , Zinc and Lead in Cervarix.
” “ After being injected , those microparticles , nanoparticles and aggregates can stay around the injection site forming swellings and granulomas … But they can also be carried by the blood circulation , escaping any attempt to guess what will be their final destination … As happens with all foreign bodies , particularly that small , they induce an inflammatory reaction that is chronic because most @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ Furthermore , the protein-corona effect … due to a nano-bio-interaction … can produce organic/inorganic composite particles capable of stimulating the immune system in an undesirable way … It is impossible not to add that particles the size often observed in vaccines can enter cell nuclei and interact with the DNA … ” “ In some cases , e.g .
as occurs with Iron and some Iron alloys , they can corrode and the corrosion products exert a toxicity affecting the tissues … ” So here is the question to ponder : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just particles that deleteriously affect human health in numerous ways , or are they also nanosensors that can receive and transmit data to the Smart Grid ?
Nanotechnology is at the Forefront of Cutting-Edge Vaccine Research The nanotech agenda is closely connected to vaccines .
For example , this 2019 study Nanoparticle-Based Vaccines Against Respiratory Viruses touts the advantages of nanotech vaccines : “ Conventional vaccines based on live-attenuated pathogens present a risk of reversion to pathogenic virulence while inactivated pathogen vaccines often lead to a weak immune response .
Subunit vaccines were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ However , these vaccines may suffer from a limited immunogenicity and , in most cases , the protection induced is only partial .
A new generation of vaccines based on nanoparticles has shown great potential to address most of the limitations of conventional and subunit vaccines .
“ This is due to recent advances in chemical and biological engineering , which allow the design of nanoparticles with a precise control over the size , shape , functionality and surface properties , leading to enhanced antigen presentation and strong immunogenicity.
” This July 2020 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nanomaterial path forward explains how there are many nanotech platforms that will be included in future vaccines : “ Nanotechnology-based approaches offer enabling solutions to the delivery challenge by trafficking the vaccine to appropriate cellular populations and subcellular locations … “ Moderna ’ s mRNA vaccine is based on a lipid nanoparticle platform , but there are many other emerging nanotechnologies for delivery of nucleic acid vaccines … Nanotechnology platforms including cationic nanoemulsions , liposomes , dendrimers or polysaccharide particles have been employed for improving the stability and delivery of mRNA based vaccines.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ by NWO frontman and eugenicist Bill Gates is a new type of technology : an mRNA vaccine that uses nanotechnology .
This goes for other COVID vaccines that are being developed .
The COVID plandemic is being used as a pretext to rush forward even faster with nanotech vaccines , which ultimately accelerates the central NWO ( New World Order ) scheme : the human microchipping agenda .
The nanotech agenda via COVID is on full display : “ Nanomaterials play an important role in all aspects of vaccine design , delivery and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and stabilization of antigens upon administration , they can serve as adjuvants to boost the immune response , and they can act as carriers for the targeted delivery of antigens .
“ Indeed , an mRNA vaccine delivered by a liposomal nanoparticle is amongst the candidates currently in clinical trials against SARS-CoV-2 .
While it remains a fact that no mRNA or DNA vaccine is currently approved for any disease , the delivery of nucleic acids requires some form of modification or a nanodevice to prevent degradation in the body , and liposomal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ RNA delivery , albeit not yet for vaccines.
” This is it !
It ’ s game on !
All the things that many alternative researchers have been writing , talking and warning about for years are arriving .
Operation Coronavirus is the gateway to bring in the New World Order .
COVID has been the excuse offered by tyrants for just about every draconian restriction under the sun .
Now , with the coming COVID vaccine , we know it will include some kind of nanotechnology , since as I have outlined @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nanotechnology platforms being developed in addition to things like hydrogel .
Various studies and the pharmaceutical companies themselves are openly stating that there will be nanotech COVID vaccines .
With plans to make this vaccine widepsread , administed by the military ( as admitted in both the US and the UK ) and “ as mandatory as possible ” ( according to Aussie PM Scott Morrison ) , time is running out for people to wake up to the nanotech agenda – before it ’ s too late .

Former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America, Carlo Maria Viganò, has recently been joined by another Vatican ‘insider.’ His name is Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke.
Burke is the founder of The Shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe, former head of the Vatican Supreme Court and patron of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta.
According to Burke as he said during a Saturday homily:
“Then there is the mysterious Wuhan virus about whose nature and prevention the mass media daily give us conflicting information. What is clear, however, is that it has been used by certain forces, inimical to families and to the freedom of nations, to advance their evil agenda.
“These forces tell us that we are now the subjects of the so-called ‘Great Reset,’ the ‘new normal,’ which is dictated to us by their manipulation of citizens and nations through ignorance and fear.”
He is referring to the manipulation of human consciousness, something we here at CE talk about quite a bit.
Burke has come under sharp criticism for his views many times, and if someone popular speaks up against “The Great Reset” or paints a picture of COVID that doesn’t match the narrative we constantly receive from mainstream media, their words usually remain unacknowledged and, if they get big enough and achieve some sort of virality, they’re usually labelled as a conspiracy theory or “fake news.”
Source: Collective-Evolution.com (excerpt)


humansarefree--2020-11-01--Study: CDC Scientists Make 2 COVID Admissions that Destroy Official Narrative

In a June 2020 study , CDC scientists made 2 COVID admissions which destroy the official coronavirus narrative .
that totally destroy the official COVID narrative in a study published in June 2020 entitled Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease , United States .
The interesting thing about this whole scamdemic is that when you dig deep enough , the truth is out there – and it is admitted by official sources – however it does take a lot of persistence to cut through the propagandistic maze of disinfo .
In this article , we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the significance of what the CDC scientists revealed , namely that for their research involving the allegedly new virus SARS-CoV-2 , they only used 37 base pairs from actual sample tissue and filled in the rest ( around 30,000 base pairs ) with computer generated sequences , i.e .
they made it up !
The other of the COVID admissions is equally as stunning : after testing they found that SARS-CoV-2 could not infect human tissue .
# 1 COVID Admission : The Computer-Generated Frankenstein Virus : CDC Scientists Admit Only Using @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Assemble SARS-CoV-2 In a previous article , I talked about how SARS-CoV-2 is a stitched-together , Frankenstein virus , because it is a computer-generated , digital , abstract creation , not a real living virus .
It has never been properly purified and isolated so that it could be sequenced from end-to-end once derived from living tissue ; instead , it ’ s just digitally assembled from a computer viral database .
The CDC scientists state they took just 37 base pairs from a genome of 30,000 base pairs !
That means that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is derived from actual living samples or real bodily tissue .
Here is the quote : We designed 37 pairs of nested PCRs spanning the genome on the basis of the coronavirus reference sequence ( GenBank accession no .
NC045512 ) .
We extracted nucleic acid from isolates and amplified by using the 37 individual nested PCRs.
” Interestingly enough , in the next paragraph , the CDC scientists say they used “ quantitative PCR ” for further analysis/construction , which goes against what Kary Mullis , the inventor of PCR , once @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is an oxymoron ” since PCR is inherently a qualitative technique not a quantitative one .
I have covered how badly the PCR test is being misused throughout this entire COVID scamdemic in other articles such as this one .
In his article Only Poisoned Monkey Kidney Cells ‘ Grew ’ the ‘ Virus ’ Dr. Thomas Cowan highlights this scientific fraud : “ … we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end , they found 37 base pairs from unpurified samples using PCR @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at 37 out of the approximately 30,000 of the base pairs that are claimed to be the genome of the intact virus .
They then took these 37 segments and put them into a computer program , which filled in the rest of the base pairs .
“ To me , this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud .
Here is an equivalency : A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof , a hair from a tail , and a snippet of a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn , and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn .
Of course , they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn ’ s hair , hooves and horn.
” Pure or true science attempts to prove whether something is so ; hence true science has no room for politics , majority rules or consensus .
Yet , according to Cowan , consensus was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was the most real fake model : “ The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by “ consensus , ” sort of like a vote .
Again , different computer programs will come up with different versions of the imaginary “ unicorn , ” so they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn.
” A big part of the official story we were told was that COVID was a new , dangerous and unpredictable disease that was both fast-spreading and lethal .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ very lethal since the CDC scientists found that it couldn ’ t even infect human cells in vitro .
They tested the ‘ virus ’ ( not really , but solutions they claim contain samples of SARS-CoV-2 ) on 3 different types of human tissue cultures ( human adenocarcinoma cells [ A549 ] , human liver cells [ HUH 7.0 ] and human embryonic kidney cells [ HEK-293T ] ) .
The ‘ virus ’ was not able to infect any of the 3 human tissue cultures .
Here ’ s the quote @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several common primate and human cell lines , including human adenocarcinoma cells ( A549 ) , human liver cells ( HUH7.0 ) , and human embryonic kidney cells ( HEK-293T ) , in addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 cells .
“ We also examined an available big brown bat kidney cell line ( EFK3B ) for SARS-CoV-2 replication capacity .
Each cell line was inoculated at high multiplicity of infection and examined 24 h postinfection … No CPE was observed in any of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which grew to > 107 PFU at 24 h postinfection .
“ In contrast , HUH7.0 and 293T cells showed only modest viral replication , and A549 cells were incompatible with SARS-CoV-2 infection .
These results are consistent with previous susceptibility findings for SARS-CoV and suggest other common culture systems , including MDCK , HeLa , HEP-2 , MRC-5 cells , and embryonated eggs , are unlikely to support SARS-CoV-2 replication .
“ In addition , SARS-CoV-2 did not replicate in bat EFK3B cells , which are susceptible to MERS-CoV .
Together , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ similar profile to SARS-CoV in terms of susceptible cell lines.
” CPE stands for cytopathic effect or cytopathogenic effect and refers to structural changes in cells caused by viral invasion .
No CPE was found in any of the human tissue cells , but only in the vero cells ( animal cells , in this case monkey cells ) .
The key takeaway from the above quote is that 2 cultures had only modest viral replication , the other tissue had none , and that other common human cultures are “ unlikely to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not infect them !
So , even by the rules of their own game , SARS-CoV-2 is not an infectious agent for humans .
Here ’ s Dr. Cowan ’ s analysis : “ What does this language actually mean , and why is it the most shocking statement of all from the virology community ?
When virologists attempt to prove infection , they have three possible “ hosts ” or models on which they can test .
The first is humans .
Exposure to humans is generally not done for ethical reasons @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or any coronavirus .
“ The second possible host is animals .
Forgetting for a moment that they never actually use purified virus when exposing animals , they do use solutions that they claim contain the virus .
Exposure to animals has been done once with SARS-CoV-2 , in an experiment that used mice .
The researchers found that none of the wild ( normal ) mice got sick .
In a group of genetically modified mice , a statistically insignificant number lost some fur .
They experienced nothing like the illness called @ @ @ @ @ @ @ use to prove infection and pathogenicity — the method they most rely on — is inoculation of solutions they say contain the virus onto a variety of tissue cultures .
As I have pointed out many times , such inoculation has never been shown to kill ( lyse ) the tissue , unless the tissue is first starved and poisoned .
The shocking thing about the above quote is that using their own methods , the virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 — even in high amounts — were NOT , I repeat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ three human tissue cultures they tested .
In plain English , this means they proved , on their terms , that this “ new coronavirus ” is not infectious to human beings .
It is ONLY infective to monkey kidney cells , and only then when you add two potent drugs ( gentamicin and amphotericin ) , known to be toxic to kidneys , to the mix .
My friends , read this again and again .
These virologists , published by the CDC , performed a clear proof , on their terms @ @ @ @ @ @ @ harmless to human beings .
That is the only possible conclusion , but , unfortunately , this result is not even mentioned in their conclusion.
” These 2 COVID Admissions Sink the Official Narrative Even More So there you have it : more scientific fraud in the form of these 2 COVID admissions , and yet more evidence showing there is no real virus , and whatever the ‘ virus ’ is , it certainly not anything to be worried about if you are a human – which I guess you probably are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ These COVID admissions go to show that the truth is often hidden in plain sight , and that people in positions of power must always be carefully scrutinized .
We must apply critical thinking to everything that comes from official sources .
By Makia Freeman , Guest writer , HumansAreFree.com / Hat tip to Sally Fallon Morrell and Dr. Thomas Cowan of the Weston A .
Price Foundation .

In a June 2020 study, CDC scientists made 2 COVID admissions which destroy the official coronavirus narrative.
CDC (Center for Disease Control) scientists made some COVID admissions
that totally destroy the official COVID narrative in a study published in June 2020 entitled Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease, United States. The interesting thing about this whole scamdemic is that when you dig deep enough, the truth is out there – and it is admitted by official sources – however it does take a lot of persistence to cut through the propagandistic maze of disinfo.
In this article, we’re going to take a look at the significance of what the CDC scientists revealed, namely that for their research involving the allegedly new virus SARS-CoV-2, they only used 37 base pairs from actual sample tissue and filled in the rest (around 30,000 base pairs) with computer generated sequences, i.e. they made it up!
The other of the COVID admissions is equally as stunning: after testing they found that SARS-CoV-2 could not infect human tissue.
#1 COVID Admission: The Computer-Generated Frankenstein Virus: CDC Scientists Admit Only Using 37 Base Pairs from Real Tissue to Assemble SARS-CoV-2
In a previous article, I talked about how SARS-CoV-2 is a stitched-together, Frankenstein virus, because it is a computer-generated, digital, abstract creation, not a real living virus. It has never been properly purified and isolated so that it could be sequenced from end-to-end once derived from living tissue; instead, it’s just digitally assembled from a computer viral database.
The CDC scientists state they took just 37 base pairs from a genome of 30,000 base pairs! That means that about 0.001% of the viral sequence is derived from actual living samples or real bodily tissue.
Here is the quote:
“Whole-Genome Sequencing
We designed 37 pairs of nested PCRs spanning the genome on the basis of the coronavirus reference sequence (GenBank accession no. NC045512). We extracted nucleic acid from isolates and amplified by using the 37 individual nested PCRs.”
Interestingly enough, in the next paragraph, the CDC scientists say they used “quantitative PCR” for further analysis/construction, which goes against what Kary Mullis, the inventor of PCR, once said – namely that “quantitative PCR is an oxymoron” since PCR is inherently a qualitative technique not a quantitative one.
I have covered how badly the PCR test is being misused throughout this entire COVID scamdemic in other articles such as this one.
In his article Only Poisoned Monkey Kidney Cells ‘Grew’ the ‘Virus’ Dr. Thomas Cowan highlights this scientific fraud:
“… we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, they found 37 base pairs from unpurified samples using PCR probes. This means they actually looked at 37 out of the approximately 30,000 of the base pairs that are claimed to be the genome of the intact virus. They then took these 37 segments and put them into a computer program, which filled in the rest of the base pairs.
“To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud. Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn.
“They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves and horn.”
Pure or true science attempts to prove whether something is so; hence true science has no room for politics, majority rules or consensus. Yet, according to Cowan, consensus was used to determine which digital SARS-CoV-2 model was the most real fake model:
“The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by “consensus,” sort of like a vote. Again, different computer programs will come up with different versions of the imaginary “unicorn,” so they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn.”
#2 COVID Admission: CDC Scientists Found that SARS-CoV-2 Didn’t Infect Human Tissue
A big part of the official story we were told was that COVID was a new, dangerous and unpredictable disease that was both fast-spreading and lethal. Well, it’s apparently not very lethal since the CDC scientists found that it couldn’t even infect human cells in vitro.
They tested the ‘virus’ (not really, but solutions they claim contain samples of SARS-CoV-2) on 3 different types of human tissue cultures (human adenocarcinoma cells [A549], human liver cells [HUH 7.0] and human embryonic kidney cells [HEK-293T]). The ‘virus’ was not able to infect any of the 3 human tissue cultures. Here’s the quote:
“… we examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several common primate and human cell lines, including human adenocarcinoma cells (A549), human liver cells (HUH7.0), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T), in addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 cells.
“We also examined an available big brown bat kidney cell line (EFK3B) for SARS-CoV-2 replication capacity. Each cell line was inoculated at high multiplicity of infection and examined 24 h postinfection … No CPE was observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero cells, which grew to >107 PFU at 24 h postinfection.
“In contrast, HUH7.0 and 293T cells showed only modest viral replication, and A549 cells were incompatible with SARS-CoV-2 infection. These results are consistent with previous susceptibility findings for SARS-CoV and suggest other common culture systems, including MDCK, HeLa, HEP-2, MRC-5 cells, and embryonated eggs, are unlikely to support SARS-CoV-2 replication.
“In addition, SARS-CoV-2 did not replicate in bat EFK3B cells, which are susceptible to MERS-CoV. Together, the results indicate that SARS-CoV-2 maintains a similar profile to SARS-CoV in terms of susceptible cell lines.”
CPE stands for cytopathic effect or cytopathogenic effect and refers to structural changes in cells caused by viral invasion. No CPE was found in any of the human tissue cells, but only in the vero cells (animal cells, in this case monkey cells).
The key takeaway from the above quote is that 2 cultures had only modest viral replication, the other tissue had none, and that other common human cultures are “unlikely to support SARS-CoV-2 replication” meaning SARS-CoV-2 will not infect them! So, even by the rules of their own game, SARS-CoV-2 is not an infectious agent for humans. Here’s Dr. Cowan’s analysis:
“What does this language actually mean, and why is it the most shocking statement of all from the virology community? When virologists attempt to prove infection, they have three possible “hosts” or models on which they can test. The first is humans. Exposure to humans is generally not done for ethical reasons and has never been done with SARS-CoV-2 or any coronavirus.
“The second possible host is animals. Forgetting for a moment that they never actually use purified virus when exposing animals, they do use solutions that they claim contain the virus. Exposure to animals has been done once with SARS-CoV-2, in an experiment that used mice. The researchers found that none of the wild (normal) mice got sick. In a group of genetically modified mice, a statistically insignificant number lost some fur. They experienced nothing like the illness called Covid 19.
The third method virologists use to prove infection and pathogenicity — the method they most rely on — is inoculation of solutions they say contain the virus onto a variety of tissue cultures. As I have pointed out many times, such inoculation has never been shown to kill (lyse) the tissue, unless the tissue is first starved and poisoned.
The shocking thing about the above quote is that using their own methods, the virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 — even in high amounts — were NOT, I repeat NOT, infective to any of the three human tissue cultures they tested.
In plain English, this means they proved, on their terms, that this “new coronavirus” is not infectious to human beings. It is ONLY infective to monkey kidney cells, and only then when you add two potent drugs (gentamicin and amphotericin), known to be toxic to kidneys, to the mix.
My friends, read this again and again. These virologists, published by the CDC, performed a clear proof, on their terms, showing that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is harmless to human beings. That is the only possible conclusion, but, unfortunately, this result is not even mentioned in their conclusion.”
These 2 COVID Admissions Sink the Official Narrative Even More
So there you have it: more scientific fraud in the form of these 2 COVID admissions, and yet more evidence showing there is no real virus, and whatever the ‘virus’ is, it certainly not anything to be worried about if you are a human – which I guess you probably are if you’re reading this.
These COVID admissions go to show that the truth is often hidden in plain sight, and that people in positions of power must always be carefully scrutinized. We must apply critical thinking to everything that comes from official sources.
By Makia Freeman, Guest writer, HumansAreFree.com / Hat tip to Sally Fallon Morrell and Dr. Thomas Cowan of the Weston A. Price Foundation.


humansarefree--2020-11-01--ANTIFA Terrorists Storm a Seattle News Outlet for Covering Their Crimes

A group of left-wing ANTIFA terrorists stormed a news outlet in Seattle in retaliation after they reported accurately about the group ’ s orgy of destruction in the city .
News station KING was targeted by ANTIFA terrorists because reporter Chris Ingalls posted some photos of suspected ANTIFA terrorists on his Twitter account .
ANTIFA terrorists are arguing that they should be allowed to commit anonymous criminal acts with impunity , and anyone who exposes their behavior is putting their lives at risk .
“ I ’ m trying to protect the lives of protesters because they ’ re going @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the public , ” an extremist shouted during the attempted siege of the KING news station .
“ We have hate groups out here that are looking to kill and harm protesters , and they want to sit there and put the protesters ’ public information .
They did an investigation , and they ’ re doxing protesters , ” the extremist added .
The terrorist display by the ANTIFA radicals in opposition to the 1st Amendment can be seen here : Big League Politics has reported on the hellscape that is Seattle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that even the police chief was forced to resign : The Chief of the Seattle Police Department , Carmen Best , announced that she would be resigning as chief after the Seattle City Council approved a defunding plan that would force the police to fire 100 officers .
Sources from within the department describe the chief objecting to the city council ’ s continued scapegoating of the police department in response to leftist political pressure , refusal to condemn ANTIFA marches that targeted her house , and a pay cut implemented by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the Seattle Police in an email to officers following the city council vote .
Chief Best had been the first black chief of the Seattle Police Department .
Attorney General Bill Barr had hailed Chief Best for her assistance in liberating Seattle ’ s downtown from the self-declared CHAZ ( Capital Hill Autonomous Zone ) anarchist commune , omitting any mention of progressive mayor Jenny Durkan in a press release praising the restoration of law and order to the troubled area .
Murders in Seattle have spiked significantly , with some estimates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ % relative to 2019 .
King County is moving forward with a plan to close Seattle ’ s primary jail facility , with the lack of a plan for a replacement suggesting that the city is simply planning with doing away with pre-trial confinement for anyone but the most serious criminal suspects .
Journalists who put themselves in harm ’ s way to report on ANTIFA and Black Lives Matter terrorism deserve major kudos .

A group of left-wing ANTIFA terrorists stormed a news outlet in Seattle in retaliation after they reported accurately about the group’s orgy of destruction in the city.
by Shane Trejo
News station KING was targeted by ANTIFA terrorists because reporter Chris Ingalls posted some photos of suspected ANTIFA terrorists on his Twitter account.
ANTIFA terrorists are arguing that they should be allowed to commit anonymous criminal acts with impunity, and anyone who exposes their behavior is putting their lives at risk.
“I’m trying to protect the lives of protesters because they’re going to dox them and put them in the public,” an extremist shouted during the attempted siege of the KING news station.
“We have hate groups out here that are looking to kill and harm protesters, and they want to sit there and put the protesters’ public information. They did an investigation, and they’re doxing protesters,” the extremist added.
WHO ARE THEY? @K5Investigators poured over nearly 100 arrest records from the Seattle protests. Who are the people that are allegedly looting, setting fires and turning violent? Our investigation finds some surprising answers, tonight on @KING5Seattle at 6:30. pic.twitter.com/VVfHmw3ws3 — Chris Ingalls (@CJIngalls) October 29, 2020
The terrorist display by the ANTIFA radicals in opposition to the 1st Amendment can be seen here:
Some activists stormed King 5 in Seattle for reporting on their arrests. pic.twitter.com/MdsibtEcVL — Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) October 30, 2020
Now they're getting arrested. pic.twitter.com/nhf75iOtYj — Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) October 30, 2020
Big League Politics has reported on the hellscape that is Seattle, which has become such a nightmare that even the police chief was forced to resign:
The Chief of the Seattle Police Department, Carmen Best, announced that she would be resigning as chief after the Seattle City Council approved a defunding plan that would force the police to fire 100 officers.
Sources from within the department describe the chief objecting to the city council’s continued scapegoating of the police department in response to leftist political pressure, refusal to condemn ANTIFA marches that targeted her house, and a pay cut implemented by the council.
Chief Best announced her retirement from the Seattle Police in an email to officers following the city council vote.
Chief Best had been the first black chief of the Seattle Police Department.
Attorney General Bill Barr had hailed Chief Best for her assistance in liberating Seattle’s downtown from the self-declared CHAZ (Capital Hill Autonomous Zone) anarchist commune, omitting any mention of progressive mayor Jenny Durkan in a press release praising the restoration of law and order to the troubled area.
Murders in Seattle have spiked significantly, with some estimates pointing to an increase of almost 50% relative to 2019. King County is moving forward with a plan to close Seattle’s primary jail facility, with the lack of a plan for a replacement suggesting that the city is simply planning with doing away with pre-trial confinement for anyone but the most serious criminal suspects.
Journalists who put themselves in harm’s way to report on ANTIFA and Black Lives Matter terrorism deserve major kudos.


humansarefree--2020-11-03--Bermuda Halts 5G Deployment and Opens Inquiry into Safety of FCC Radiation Limits

Bermuda has halted 5G and launched a consultation in the safety of Federal Communications Commission human exposure limits , millimetre waves and 5G technology .
The consultation document of the Regulatory Authority of Bermuda regards the general concerns about alleged health impacts from the use of radiofrequency radiation , the adequacy of Federal Communications limits to protect , the use of millimeter wave spectrum and whether there should be a restriction on the number of networks that may be deployed .
The Consultation Requests answers to these 5 questions : 1 .
Do you agree that the Federal Communications Commission @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by radio , television , wire , satellite and cable within the United States , RF Exposure standards1 are appropriate for Bermuda ?
If not , what is a suitable alternative and why ?
2 .
Do you agree that all antennae used by licensed sectoral providers should be registered with the RA ?
If not , what if anything should be registered with the RA e.g .
location , direction ( if applicable ) and power level ?
3 .
Do you agree that the Moratorium established by the EGD should be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be modified and how should it be modified and why ?
4 .
Do you agree that a real-time , publicly accessible Radiofrequency field intensity monitoring network should be deployed and a dedicated fee be levied on relevant sectoral providers and end-users that use Radiofrequency spectrum to cover the cost of the deployment and ongoing maintenance ?
5 .
Should mmWave networks and small-cell technologies be restricted or prohibited in Bermuda ?
If so , why and what alternatives should be used ?
The issue is making headlines in Bermuda .
Click here @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of 5G .
In the United States , the New Hampshire Commission to Study the Environmental and Health Effects of Evolving 5G Technology just released its final report to the Governor summarizing its findings that safety assurances for 5G have “ come into question because of the thousands of peer-reviewed studies documenting deleterious health effects associated with cellphone radiation exposure.
” The majority of the New Hampshire Commission voted to support 15 recommendations to the New Hampshire Governor .
Recommendations include : support an independent study of 5G health effects ; reduce public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Wi-Fi in schools and libraries ; ensure cell network infrastructure antenna setbacks from schools and homes ; measure levels of cell network radiation ; establish wireless radiation limits to protect trees and insects ; establish more sophisticated measurement protocols to include high data rates ; require software changes to reduce radiation exposure into the body ; establish wireless radiation-free zones ; and call on the US Federal Communications Commission to do an environmental assessment on the impact of 5G and wireless infrastructure expansion .
The report has been sent to the New @ @ @ @ @ @ @ President .
Resolutions to halt 5G have been passed by Hawaii County , Farragut Tennessee and Easton Connecticut .
Cities such as Los Altos , Petaluma , Mill Valley , and San Diego County California have adopted policies to restrict 5G small cells near homes .
Oregon passed a Bill to study Wi-Fi health effects .
The American Academy of Pediatrics and the California Department of Health recommend children reduce cell phone radiation exposure , as do medical organizations internationally , such as the Vienna Medical Association , Athens Medical Association and International @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 600 cities in Italy have passed resolutions to halt 5G , as have cities throughout Europe , such as Trafford , United Kingdom , Lille , France , Ormidia , Cyprus , Balchik , Bulgaria .
The Pancyprian Medical Association and Cyprus National Committee on the Environment and Child Health sent Parliament their position paper “ The Risks to Public Health from the Use of the 5G Network.
” Switzerland ’ s report on 5G health effects resulted in the Parliament ’ s refusal to loosen their radiation limits despite heavy industry lobbying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ report that recommended measuring radiation levels and also recommended against using the 26 GHz frequency band for 5G “ for as long as the potential health risks have not been investigated .
”

Bermuda has halted 5G and launched a consultation in the safety of Federal Communications Commission human exposure limits, millimetre waves and 5G technology.
The consultation document of the Regulatory Authority of Bermuda regards the general concerns about alleged health impacts from the use of radiofrequency radiation, the adequacy of Federal Communications limits to protect, the use of millimeter wave spectrum and whether there should be a restriction on the number of networks that may be deployed.
The Consultation Requests answers to these 5 questions:
1. Do you agree that the Federal Communications Commission, which regulates interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite and cable within the United States, RF Exposure standards1 are appropriate for Bermuda?
If not, what is a suitable alternative and why?
2. Do you agree that all antennae used by licensed sectoral providers should be registered with the RA? If not, what if anything should be registered with the RA e.g. location, direction (if applicable) and power level?
3. Do you agree that the Moratorium established by the EGD should be removed? If not, should it be modified and how should it be modified and why?
4. Do you agree that a real-time, publicly accessible Radiofrequency field intensity monitoring network should be deployed and a dedicated fee be levied on relevant sectoral providers and end-users that use Radiofrequency spectrum to cover the cost of the deployment and ongoing maintenance?
5. Should mmWave networks and small-cell technologies be restricted or prohibited in Bermuda? If so, why and what alternatives should be used?
The issue is making headlines in Bermuda.
Royal Gazette “Pressure groups unite to oppose introduction of 5G mobile phone technology”.
Click here to download Bermuda Inquiry into the Safety of 5G.
MAJOR ACTION TO HALT 5G WORLDWIDE
In the United States, the New Hampshire Commission to Study the Environmental and Health Effects of Evolving 5G Technology just released its final report to the Governor summarizing its findings that safety assurances for 5G have “come into question because of the thousands of peer-reviewed studies documenting deleterious health effects associated with cellphone radiation exposure.”
The majority of the New Hampshire Commission voted to support 15 recommendations to the New Hampshire Governor.
Recommendations include: support an independent study of 5G health effects; reduce public exposure to cell phones, wireless devices and Wi-Fi in schools and libraries; ensure cell network infrastructure antenna setbacks from schools and homes; measure levels of cell network radiation; establish wireless radiation limits to protect trees and insects; establish more sophisticated measurement protocols to include high data rates; require software changes to reduce radiation exposure into the body; establish wireless radiation-free zones; and call on the US Federal Communications Commission to do an environmental assessment on the impact of 5G and wireless infrastructure expansion.
The report has been sent to the New Hampshire Governor, House Speaker and Senate President.
Resolutions to halt 5G have been passed by Hawaii County, Farragut Tennessee and Easton Connecticut. Cities such as Los Altos, Petaluma, Mill Valley, and San Diego County California have adopted policies to restrict 5G small cells near homes. Oregon passed a Bill to study Wi-Fi health effects.
The American Academy of Pediatrics and the California Department of Health recommend children reduce cell phone radiation exposure, as do medical organizations internationally, such as the Vienna Medical Association, Athens Medical Association and International Society of Doctors for Environment.
Over 600 cities in Italy have passed resolutions to halt 5G, as have cities throughout Europe, such as Trafford, United Kingdom, Lille, France, Ormidia, Cyprus, Balchik, Bulgaria. The Pancyprian Medical Association and Cyprus National Committee on the Environment and Child Health sent Parliament their position paper “The Risks to Public Health from the Use of the 5G Network.”
Bermuda has halted 5G pending a report on safety.
Switzerland’s report on 5G health effects resulted in the Parliament’s refusal to loosen their radiation limits despite heavy industry lobbying efforts. The Netherlands issued a 5G report that recommended measuring radiation levels and also recommended against using the 26 GHz frequency band for 5G “for as long as the potential health risks have not been investigated.”
Source: Ehtrust.org


humansarefree--2020-11-02--New Bill Will Criminalize Christian Teaching On Sexuality

The government of Canada is becoming more Communist than Socialist at this point .
If a new bill , C-6 becomes law , parents could be subject to ‘ criminal prosecution ’ for private conversations with their children about sexual orientation .
Bill C-6 outlaws so-called conversion therapy , which it defines as “ a practice , treatment or service designed to change a person ’ s sexual orientation to heterosexual or gender identity to cisgender , or to repress or reduce non-heterosexual attraction or sexual behaviour.
” As we reported in a previous article , the members of Parliament @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It now moves to the House of Commons .
The government wants control over your life , including your families .
They are trying to dictate to you morality .
God already did that , yet , as always , man seeks to try and improve on what God already created and established .
I was encouraged that the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops ( CCCB ) reached out to the Canadian government in a letter .
“ There is the possibility that within families , private conversations between parents and their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be deemed public and subject to criminal prosecution – which in turn raises serious questions regarding the legitimacy of government surveillance , professional confidentiality , and infringement of privacy .
“ As principal educators of their children , parents have a right to raise them in accordance with their legitimate and ethical religious beliefs .
Any state intervention should not override the primary parental right to care for their children and make decisions for their well-being.
” Amen to that dose of common sense .
“ There is a real danger that Christian @ @ @ @ @ @ @ respect to human sexuality would be interpreted as criminal acts , ” the Catholic bishops warned .
“ The Bill could even criminalize Catholic ministries and groups , religious leaders , or pastors who encourage individuals with same-sex attraction to live chastely and in conformity with the teachings of the Gospel , the moral principles of the Catholic Church , and the dictates of their own conscience.
” It would not just criminalize Catholics , but all of Christianity .
Friends , while we were warned these days would come , we should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for protection .
We should also petition our government and voice our concerns against these types of agendas .
God never said sit there and take a beating .
He has always sent His People out into the world to try and make it better and spread His Word .
Let ’ s ensure we do that , let ’ s ensure we do our part to the very end .

The government of Canada is becoming more Communist than Socialist at this point. If a new bill, C-6 becomes law, parents could be subject to ‘criminal prosecution’ for private conversations with their children about sexual orientation.
by Brandon T. Ward
Life Site News explained that:
Bill C-6 outlaws so-called conversion therapy, which it defines as “a practice, treatment or service designed to change a person’s sexual orientation to heterosexual or gender identity to cisgender, or to repress or reduce non-heterosexual attraction or sexual behaviour.”
As we reported in a previous article, the members of Parliament voted 305-7 in favor of Bill C-6. It now moves to the House of Commons.
The government wants control over your life, including your families. They are trying to dictate to you morality. God already did that, yet, as always, man seeks to try and improve on what God already created and established.
I was encouraged that the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops (CCCB) reached out to the Canadian government in a letter.
They stated,
“There is the possibility that within families, private conversations between parents and their children on matters of human sexuality will be deemed public and subject to criminal prosecution – which in turn raises serious questions regarding the legitimacy of government surveillance, professional confidentiality, and infringement of privacy.
“As principal educators of their children, parents have a right to raise them in accordance with their legitimate and ethical religious beliefs. Any state intervention should not override the primary parental right to care for their children and make decisions for their well-being.”
Amen to that dose of common sense.
They continue.
“There is a real danger that Christian and other religious and ethical teaching with respect to human sexuality would be interpreted as criminal acts,” the Catholic bishops warned.
“The Bill could even criminalize Catholic ministries and groups, religious leaders, or pastors who encourage individuals with same-sex attraction to live chastely and in conformity with the teachings of the Gospel, the moral principles of the Catholic Church, and the dictates of their own conscience.”
It would not just criminalize Catholics, but all of Christianity.
Friends, while we were warned these days would come, we should seek God in prayer and ask Him for protection. We should also petition our government and voice our concerns against these types of agendas.
God never said sit there and take a beating. He has always sent His People out into the world to try and make it better and spread His Word. Let’s ensure we do that, let’s ensure we do our part to the very end.


humansarefree--2020-11-02--Joe Biden’s Campaign Slogan ‘Build Back Better’ Was Actually Taken From UN’s New World Order Agenda

Joe Biden chose ‘ Build Back Better ’ as his campaign slogan because he is the chosen vessel of the New World Order , and a Biden Harris administration would tear down the United States from sea to shining sea .
The first time I heard Joe Biden ’ s campaign slogan of ‘ Build Back Better ’ , it struck me as strange because it was just so clunky and inherently meaningless .
Build what back ?
Better than what ?
It just kind of hovers in the ether , meaning nothing and saying nothing .
But as it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , so much so that it turns out to be the main slogan to the impending New World Order of the United Nations .
What an odd choice for a campaign slogan for a United States candidate for president , unless… .
“ Behold ye among the heathen , and regard , and wonder marvellously : for I will work a work in your days , which ye will not believe , though it be told you.
” Habakkuk 1:5 ( KJB ) Unless it ’ s connected to something called The Great @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the Fourth Industrial Revolution , unless it ’ s connected to this entire COVID-19 global trojan horse of the New World Order .
Which , as it turns out , is exactly what the truth is .
Joe Biden chose ‘ Build Back Better ’ as his campaign slogan because he is the chosen vessel of the New World Order , and a Biden-Harris administration would tear down the United States from sea to shining sea .
Build Back Better ?
Only if you ’ re a globalist .
Build Back Better @ @ @ @ @ @ @ New Deal of AOC and the Democratic Socialists , for Climate Activism , for defunding the police called for by Black Lives Matter , and for the call to ‘ radically reimagine ’ what life would like like in a post-capitalistic , post-America , post-law and order brave new world .
Still think your vote doesn ’ t count this year ?
Think again .

Joe Biden chose ‘Build Back Better’ as his campaign slogan because he is the chosen vessel of the New World Order, and a Biden Harris administration would tear down the United States from sea to shining sea.
The first time I heard Joe Biden’s campaign slogan of ‘Build Back Better’, it struck me as strange because it was just so clunky and inherently meaningless.
Build what back? Better than what? It just kind of hovers in the ether, meaning nothing and saying nothing.
But as it turns out, it says a lot, so much so that it turns out to be the main slogan to the impending New World Order of the United Nations.
What an odd choice for a campaign slogan for a United States candidate for president, unless….
“Behold ye among the heathen, and regard, and wonder marvellously: for I will work a work in your days, which ye will not believe, though it be told you.” Habakkuk 1:5 (KJB)
Unless it’s connected to something called The Great Reset, unless it’s connected to the Fourth Industrial Revolution, unless it’s connected to this entire COVID-19 global trojan horse of the New World Order.
Which, as it turns out, is exactly what the truth is.
Joe Biden chose ‘Build Back Better’ as his campaign slogan because he is the chosen vessel of the New World Order, and a Biden-Harris administration would tear down the United States from sea to shining sea.
Build Back Better? Only if you’re a globalist.

Build Back Better is a dog whistle for the Green New Deal of AOC and the Democratic Socialists, for Climate Activism, for defunding the police called for by Black Lives Matter, and for the call to ‘radically reimagine’ what life would like like in a post-capitalistic, post-America, post-law and order brave new world.
By Geoffrey Grider, Guest writer


humansarefree--2020-11-02--Transgender Agenda: Actress Emily Ratajkowski Says She Won’t Reveal Baby’s Gender Until Child is 18

Actress Emily Ratajkowski has announced that she is expecting her first child , but won ’ t reveal the baby ’ s gender until it is able to choose its own aged 18 .
“ We like to respond that we won ’ t know the gender until our child is 18 and that they ’ ll let us know then , ” she told Vogue magazine .
The model also expressed concerns that if the baby was male , it would exert its “ white privilege ” on the world .
“ I ’ ve known far too many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unaware of their privilege , and I ’ ve been traumatised by many of my experiences with them , ” she said .
“ And boys too ; it ’ s shocking to realise how early young boys gain a sense of entitlement – to girls ’ bodies and to the world in general .
“ I ’ m not scared of raising a ‘ bad guy ’ , as many of the men I ’ ve known who abuse their power do so unintentionally.
” “ But I ’ m terrified of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of awareness that are so convenient for men .
“ It feels much more daunting to create an understanding of privilege in a child than to teach simple black-and-white morality.
” The decision is being hailed as another victory for virtue signaling and progressivism by the mainstream media and the entertainment world .
Ratajkowski ’ s refusal to treat the baby as its proper biological sex will undoubtedly lead to a childhood of confusion and misery given that many people who identify as transgender or “ genderfluid ” are chronically depressed .
According @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more than twice as likely to feel suicidal and four times more likely to attempt suicide compared to heterosexual youth .
One in five transgender youth attempt to commit suicide .
Apparently , the actress is more interested in scoring ‘ woke ’ political points and securing the approval of demented fringe gender extremists than caring for her own child ’ s well being .

Actress Emily Ratajkowski has announced that she is expecting her first child, but won’t reveal the baby’s gender until it is able to choose its own aged 18.
Yes, really.
“We like to respond that we won’t know the gender until our child is 18 and that they’ll let us know then,” she told Vogue magazine.
The model also expressed concerns that if the baby was male, it would exert its “white privilege” on the world.
“I’ve known far too many white men who move through the world unaware of their privilege, and I’ve been traumatised by many of my experiences with them,” she said.
“And boys too; it’s shocking to realise how early young boys gain a sense of entitlement – to girls’ bodies and to the world in general.
“I’m not scared of raising a ‘bad guy’, as many of the men I’ve known who abuse their power do so unintentionally.”
“But I’m terrified of inadvertently cultivating the carelessness and the lack of awareness that are so convenient for men.
“It feels much more daunting to create an understanding of privilege in a child than to teach simple black-and-white morality.”
The decision is being hailed as another victory for virtue signaling and progressivism by the mainstream media and the entertainment world.
Ratajkowski’s refusal to treat the baby as its proper biological sex will undoubtedly lead to a childhood of confusion and misery given that many people who identify as transgender or “genderfluid” are chronically depressed.
According to studies, LGBT-identifying young people are more than twice as likely to feel suicidal and four times more likely to attempt suicide compared to heterosexual youth. One in five transgender youth attempt to commit suicide.
Great decision, Emily!
Apparently, the actress is more interested in scoring ‘woke’ political points and securing the approval of demented fringe gender extremists than caring for her own child’s well being.
Good luck to the kid!
Reference: Summit.news


humansarefree--2020-11-02--Remdesivir Study Accidentally Proves Hydroxychloroquine Effective Against COVID-19

To date , there has only been one study conducted on remdesivir , the Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) drug that Anthony Fauci wants you to take instead of hydroxychloroquine ( HCQ ) .
And it just so happens that this one-and-only study does not actually prove the effectiveness of remdesivir .
As it turns out , the study proves quite the opposite : that remdesivir is essentially useless , and HCQ is a winner , when it comes to remediating the symptoms associated with a severe COVID-19 infection .
Despite the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an exclusive drug treatment for COVID-19 five months ago , the latest science does not support its use as an effective therapeutic .
The aforementioned single paper on remdesivir that the FDA used as “ proof ” of the drug ’ s safety and effectiveness actually found that HCQ , presumably in conjunction with the antibiotic drug azithromycin , provided the only tangible benefits observed throughout the research .
This final paper , which was published just a few weeks ago on Oct. 8 , determined that at least 35 percent of study @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all of the patients who benefitted were those who took HCQ , as opposed to remdesivir .
“ Nothing in the study supports the hypothesis that [ r ] emdesivir is an effective antiviral for SARS-CoV-2 , ” notes Leo Goldstein .
“ The data in the final report suggests that [ h ] ydroxychloroquine , not [ r ] emdesivir , was the main factor benefitting the patients in this study.
” Remdesivir harms and kills coronavirus patients ; it does not heal What is worse , the study further found that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to HCQ actually suffered worse outcomes .
You read that correctly : the drug claimed by Fauci to be a “ cure ” for COVID-19 is actually killing COVID-19 patients .
“ The study ’ s own numbers show an association between RDV ( remdesivir ) and increased mortality in the most severe patients , ” Goldstein further explains .
“ It is also possible to conclude that RDV is net harmful for most hospitalized patients.
” Another thing to note about this study is that it in no way meets any of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ standards ” for reliable research .
For one , it was not double-blinded , though it was falsely reported as such .
The pre-registered protocol was also changed multiple times over the course of the trial , as was the primary outcome of the research .
The outcome , it turns out , was altered after it was determined that remdesivir was not providing the types of results that researchers had hoped to procure .
“ The outcome measures were subjective and not reliable , ” Goldstein further reveals , adding that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interest , aggravated by the design giving NIAID ( National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ) and Gilead ( remdesivir ’ s manufacturer ) leverage over the hospitals and physicians treating patients.
” None of this is all that surprising when considering the dark history of Gilead , which by all appearances is a terrorist organization that conspires with the deep state to commit heinous crimes against humanity .
This would explain why at least three of the study ’ s researchers received grants and/or personal fees directly from Gilead , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conflicts of interest .
Chances are that none of this will ever hit mainstream media headlines , which means readers like yourself will have to share it with your friends and family directly .
We must spread the truth far and wide because the sooner we do , the sooner this whole plandemic house of cards comes crashing down where it belongs .
Maker Of Remdesivir , Gilead , Is Behind The War On Hydroxychloroquine ( HCQ ) – They Control Covid Response Panel And Stand To Make 10s Of $ Billions By @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in taking a closer look at the study and Goldstein ’ s analysis of it , you can do so at this link .

To date, there has only been one study conducted on remdesivir, the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) drug that Anthony Fauci wants you to take instead of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). And it just so happens that this one-and-only study does not actually prove the effectiveness of remdesivir.
by Ethan Huff
As it turns out, the study proves quite the opposite: that remdesivir is essentially useless, and HCQ is a winner, when it comes to remediating the symptoms associated with a severe COVID-19 infection.
Despite the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) having granted emergency approval for remdesivir as an exclusive drug treatment for COVID-19 five months ago, the latest science does not support its use as an effective therapeutic.
The aforementioned single paper on remdesivir that the FDA used as “proof” of the drug’s safety and effectiveness actually found that HCQ, presumably in conjunction with the antibiotic drug azithromycin, provided the only tangible benefits observed throughout the research.
This final paper, which was published just a few weeks ago on Oct. 8, determined that at least 35 percent of study participants had received HCQ.
And nearly all of the patients who benefitted were those who took HCQ, as opposed to remdesivir.
“Nothing in the study supports the hypothesis that [r]emdesivir is an effective antiviral for SARS-CoV-2,” notes Leo Goldstein.
“The data in the final report suggests that [h]ydroxychloroquine, not [r]emdesivir, was the main factor benefitting the patients in this study.”
Remdesivir harms and kills coronavirus patients; it does not heal
What is worse, the study further found that the patients who received remdesivir as opposed to HCQ actually suffered worse outcomes.
You read that correctly: the drug claimed by Fauci to be a “cure” for COVID-19 is actually killing COVID-19 patients.
“The study’s own numbers show an association between RDV (remdesivir) and increased mortality in the most severe patients,” Goldstein further explains.
“It is also possible to conclude that RDV is net harmful for most hospitalized patients.”
Another thing to note about this study is that it in no way meets any of the FDA’s usual “gold standards” for reliable research.
For one, it was not double-blinded, though it was falsely reported as such.
The pre-registered protocol was also changed multiple times over the course of the trial, as was the primary outcome of the research.
The outcome, it turns out, was altered after it was determined that remdesivir was not providing the types of results that researchers had hoped to procure.
“The outcome measures were subjective and not reliable,” Goldstein further reveals, adding that the study “was marred with conflicts of interest, aggravated by the design giving NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) and Gilead (remdesivir’s manufacturer) leverage over the hospitals and physicians treating patients.”
None of this is all that surprising when considering the dark history of Gilead, which by all appearances is a terrorist organization that conspires with the deep state to commit heinous crimes against humanity.
This would explain why at least three of the study’s researchers received grants and/or personal fees directly from Gilead, and conveniently failed to report these as potential conflicts of interest.
Chances are that none of this will ever hit mainstream media headlines, which means readers like yourself will have to share it with your friends and family directly.
We must spread the truth far and wide because the sooner we do, the sooner this whole plandemic house of cards comes crashing down where it belongs.
Maker Of Remdesivir, Gilead, Is Behind The War On Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) – They Control Covid Response Panel And Stand To Make 10s Of $Billions
By the way, if you are interested in taking a closer look at the study and Goldstein’s analysis of it, you can do so at this link.


humansarefree--2020-11-02--Update: Nearly 45,000 Doctors & Scientists Sign Declaration Opposing COVID Lockdowns

“ Implementation of the current draconian measures that so extremely restrict fundamental rights can only be justified if there is reason to fear that a truly , exceptionally dangerous virus is threatening us .
Do any scientifically sound data exist to support this contention for COVID-19 ?
I assert that the answer is simply , no.
” – Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi , a specialist in microbiology and one of the most cited research scientists in German history , read more about him here .
Three weeks ago I published an article about “ The Great Barrington Declaration.
” At the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ approximately 34,000 signatures from doctors & scientists from around the world opposing lockdown measures as a way to combat COVID-19 , something the declaration describes as less dangerous than influenza .
Viruses , like already existing coronaviruses and other respiratory viruses infect billions of people a year , and kill tens of millions a year .
Why no global panic over those ?
The declaration now has nearly 45,000 signatures from doctors and scientists , and also approximately 600,000 from concerned citizens .
Dr. Martin Kulldorff , professor of medicine at Harvard University @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dr. Sunetra Gupta , professor at Oxford University , an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology , and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya , professor at Stanford University Medical School , a physician and epidemiologist where the initiators of the declaration .
According to them , lockdown measures do more harm than good and are not an effective way to deal with COVID-19 .
This echoes the sentiments of many others during this crises , yet governments still have the authority to mandate measures they deem fit , it doesn ’ t seem to matter that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disagree with these measures .
Am article published in the British Medical Journal has suggested that quarantine measures in the United Kingdom as a result of the new coronavirus may have already killed more UK seniors than the coronavirus has during the peak of the virus .
You can read more about that and access it here .
It ’ s common to hear mainstream media claim that our top health experts are encouraging global lockdown measures , and some have , but it doesn ’ t seem to be the majority .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ given the fact that mainstream media constantly beams out this narrative , while ignoring and ridiculing anyone who claims the opposite .
Mainstream media has the ability , I believe , to make the majority seem like the minority and the minority seem like the majority .
Doctors , like the ones from this declaration are never given any air time .
Thousands of doctors from all around the world in different countries are and have been forming coalitions and sharing opinions that completely contradict the recommendations that ’ ve been laid out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) and government health authorities who follow their recommendations .
Another example apart from the Great Barrington Declaration would be the fact that more than 500 German doctors & scientists have signed on as representatives of an organization called the “ Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee.
” It ’ s an organization also providing information , evidence and opinion from renowned experts .
You can read about them and find a link to their work within this article .
Furthermore , many world ’ s top doctors and scientists in this field have been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ opinions that contradict the WHO .
This has been a well known and common theme throughout this pandemic .
With COVID-19 , as with many other topics over the years , we ’ ve seen an extreme amount of censorship of information .
We now have a digital authoritarian Orwellian “ fact-checker ” that ’ s patrolling the internet telling people what is and what isn ’ t .
Should people not have the right to examine information and sources on their own to determine for themselves what they choose to believe ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ and even shut down media outlets for sharing information with sources simply because the information threatens their agenda ?
Why are they trying so hard to censor information ?
The human race is not stupid , I like to think we have the ability , ourselves , to look at information if we are interested and have the capacity to use reason and intuition to think for ourselves .
We don ’ t need a fact-checker doing that for us , in my opinion .
Why are so many doctors and scientists publishing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should not be locking down ?
That this virus is not as dangerous as mainstream media , and organizations like the WHO have made it out to be ?
If you want to see some exampels we ’ ve been writing about this since the pandemic began .
You can browse through our site and search COVID , COVID-19 or coronavirus if you ’ d like to go more in depth .
Why is there such a backlash and harsh response from certain individuals when they come across information suggesting that COVID-19 isn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
Why are both narratives not presented by mainstream media ?
Why is one always ridiculed ?
For example , in the Great Barrington Declaration states the following : “ Covid-19 is less dangerous than many other harms , including influenza .
As immunity builds in the population , the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls .
We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e .
the point at which the rate of new infections is stable… ” The idea that herd immunity can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , particularly Dr. Anthony Fauci after The Great Barrington Declaration started to gain traction .
Fauci was able to share his opinion across the planet with access to multiple mainstream media networks .
The Great Barrington Declaration was largely ignored , ridiculed , and the doctors/scientists who support it were not given an opportunity to respond , nor have they been given any air time on any mainstream media network .
The CDC also released new infection/fatality estimates that also had many people and experts calling into question the severity of the virus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , from the School of Public Health and Health Systems at the University of Waterloo recently stated that the COVID-19 fatality rate is the “ worst miscalculation in the history of humanity.
” A group of Canadian doctors in the province of Ontario have come together and written an open letter to Ontario premier Doug Ford .
The letter is signed by 20 doctors and professors of medicine from faculties at the University of Toronto , McMaster University and the University of Ottawa and from hospitals such as Sick Kids .
The letter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and it argues against a return to lockdown measures as a way to tackle rising COVID-19 cases .
You can read more about that here .
The Physicians For Informed Consent ( PIC ) recently published a report titled “ Physicians for Informed Consent ( PIC ) Compares COVID-19 to Previous Seasonal and Pandemic Flu Periods.
” According to them , the infection/fatality rate of COVID-19 is 0.26 % .
You can read more about that and access their resources and reasoning here .
The point is that the list opposing lockdown @ @ @ @ @ @ @ research , why COVID-19 is not as dangerous as it ’ s being made out to be is is quite long .
Again , these perspectives receive nothing but ridicule from the mainstream media .
This is disturbing given the fact that mainstream media , and topics covered by mainstream media play a large role in giving people their perception about this pandemic .
Who is right or wrong doesn ’ t matter here .
What matters here is the right and ability to view and access information equally , openly , transparently @ @ @ @ @ @ @ companies , who have many political ties , have the right to manipulate the perception of the masses with regards to certain topics ?
The fact that even mentioning or discussing a view that opposes what government health authorities and some politicians are telling us in this day in age is ‘ not allowed ’ should be a concern and help people realize that we ’ ve drifted quite far away from real science , and into the age of censorship and a ‘ Ministry of Truth ’ telling us what is and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the question , is what ’ s happening in our world today really about the virus , or is something else going on here ?
Why is everything in our world heavily politicized and manipulated ?
Why is there so much information that contradicts other information ?
Why are there so many doctors and scientists around the world opposing the WHO and being punished for it ?
Why do we continue to rely on mainstream sources and government recommendations to take the best course of action for the citizenry when a common theme @ @ @ @ @ @ @ manipulation ?
Eventually the citizenry simply won ’ t comply , on a mass scale .
What will happen then ?
If we can lock down billions of people for COVID-19 , imagine what we could do for more important things that desperately need our attention ?
Our potential as a species is limitless .

“Implementation of the current draconian measures that so extremely restrict fundamental rights can only be justified if there is reason to fear that a truly, exceptionally dangerous virus is threatening us. Do any scientifically sound data exist to support this contention for COVID-19? I assert that the answer is simply, no.” – Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, a specialist in microbiology and one of the most cited research scientists in German history, read more about him here.
Three weeks ago I published an article about “The Great Barrington Declaration.” At the time of publication, the declaration had approximately 34,000 signatures from doctors & scientists from around the world opposing lockdown measures as a way to combat COVID-19, something the declaration describes as less dangerous than influenza.
Viruses, like already existing coronaviruses and other respiratory viruses infect billions of people a year, and kill tens of millions a year. Why no global panic over those?
The declaration now has nearly 45,000 signatures from doctors and scientists, and also approximately 600,000 from concerned citizens.
Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist, Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician and epidemiologist where the initiators of the declaration.
According to them, lockdown measures do more harm than good and are not an effective way to deal with COVID-19. This echoes the sentiments of many others during this crises, yet governments still have the authority to mandate measures they deem fit, it doesn’t seem to matter that there are many in the field who disagree with these measures.
Am article published in the British Medical Journal has suggested that quarantine measures in the United Kingdom as a result of the new coronavirus may have already killed more UK seniors than the coronavirus has during the peak of the virus. You can read more about that and access it here.
It’s common to hear mainstream media claim that our top health experts are encouraging global lockdown measures, and some have, but it doesn’t seem to be the majority. It may appear as a majority opinion given the fact that mainstream media constantly beams out this narrative, while ignoring and ridiculing anyone who claims the opposite.
Mainstream media has the ability, I believe, to make the majority seem like the minority and the minority seem like the majority. Doctors, like the ones from this declaration are never given any air time.
Why not?
Thousands of doctors from all around the world in different countries are and have been forming coalitions and sharing opinions that completely contradict the recommendations that’ve been laid out by the World Health Organization (WHO) and government health authorities who follow their recommendations.
Another example apart from the Great Barrington Declaration would be the fact that more than 500 German doctors & scientists have signed on as representatives of an organization called the “Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee.”
It’s an organization also providing information, evidence and opinion from renowned experts. You can read about them and find a link to their work within this article.
Furthermore, many world’s top doctors and scientists in this field have been censored on social media platforms for sharing opinions that contradict the WHO. This has been a well known and common theme throughout this pandemic.
With COVID-19, as with many other topics over the years, we’ve seen an extreme amount of censorship of information. We now have a digital authoritarian Orwellian “fact-checker” that’s patrolling the internet telling people what is and what isn’t.
Should people not have the right to examine information and sources on their own to determine for themselves what they choose to believe?
Do they have the right to censor and even shut down media outlets for sharing information with sources simply because the information threatens their agenda?
Why are they trying so hard to censor information?
The human race is not stupid, I like to think we have the ability, ourselves, to look at information if we are interested and have the capacity to use reason and intuition to think for ourselves. We don’t need a fact-checker doing that for us, in my opinion.
Why are so many doctors and scientists publishing studies and sharing information that suggest we should not be locking down? That this virus is not as dangerous as mainstream media, and organizations like the WHO have made it out to be?
If you want to see some exampels we’ve been writing about this since the pandemic began. You can browse through our site and search COVID, COVID-19 or coronavirus if you’d like to go more in depth.
Why is there such a backlash and harsh response from certain individuals when they come across information suggesting that COVID-19 isn’t any worse than the flu? Why are both narratives not presented by mainstream media? Why is one always ridiculed?
For example, in the Great Barrington Declaration states the following:
“Covid-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza. As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e. the point at which the rate of new infections is stable…”
The idea that herd immunity can be reached was ridiculed by mainstream media, particularly Dr. Anthony Fauci after The Great Barrington Declaration started to gain traction. Fauci was able to share his opinion across the planet with access to multiple mainstream media networks.
The Great Barrington Declaration was largely ignored, ridiculed, and the doctors/scientists who support it were not given an opportunity to respond, nor have they been given any air time on any mainstream media network.
The CDC also released new infection/fatality estimates that also had many people and experts calling into question the severity of the virus.
Ronald B. Brown, Ph.D., from the School of Public Health and Health Systems at the University of Waterloo recently stated that the COVID-19 fatality rate is the “worst miscalculation in the history of humanity.”
A group of Canadian doctors in the province of Ontario have come together and written an open letter to Ontario premier Doug Ford. The letter is signed by 20 doctors and professors of medicine from faculties at the University of Toronto, McMaster University and the University of Ottawa and from hospitals such as Sick Kids.
The letter was sent to ford on September 27th, and it argues against a return to lockdown measures as a way to tackle rising COVID-19 cases. You can read more about that here.
The Physicians For Informed Consent (PIC) recently published a report titled “Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC) Compares COVID-19 to Previous Seasonal and Pandemic Flu Periods.” According to them, the infection/fatality rate of COVID-19 is 0.26%. You can read more about that and access their resources and reasoning here.
The point is that the list opposing lockdown measures and explaining their opinion, using research, why COVID-19 is not as dangerous as it’s being made out to be is is quite long.
Again, these perspectives receive nothing but ridicule from the mainstream media. This is disturbing given the fact that mainstream media, and topics covered by mainstream media play a large role in giving people their perception about this pandemic.
Who is right or wrong doesn’t matter here. What matters here is the right and ability to view and access information equally, openly, transparently and freely. Why should Big Tech companies, who have many political ties, have the right to manipulate the perception of the masses with regards to certain topics?
The fact that even mentioning or discussing a view that opposes what government health authorities and some politicians are telling us in this day in age is ‘not allowed’ should be a concern and help people realize that we’ve drifted quite far away from real science, and into the age of censorship and a ‘Ministry of Truth’ telling us what is and what isn’t.
It begs the question, is what’s happening in our world today really about the virus, or is something else going on here?
Why is everything in our world heavily politicized and manipulated? Why is there so much information that contradicts other information?
Why are there so many doctors and scientists around the world opposing the WHO and being punished for it?
Why do we continue to rely on mainstream sources and government recommendations to take the best course of action for the citizenry when a common theme from these entities is disinformation and perception manipulation?
Eventually the citizenry simply won’t comply, on a mass scale. What will happen then?
If we can lock down billions of people for COVID-19, imagine what we could do for more important things that desperately need our attention?
Our potential as a species is limitless.
Reference: Collective-Evolution.com