humansarefree--2020-04-27--The New ‘Normal’ vs. The People – We Do Have Some Say in All This

In a televised CBS interview with Anthony Mason on April 2nd , Bill Gates issued a few key words that have since become iconic in the world of mainstream media .
As has been the general trend whenever the famed co-founder of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation declares something that appears to implicate the personal lives of every other person on the planet , these words effectively set the tone for what would become an oft-repeated stanza across the globe .
Essentially , Gates advised that life is not expected to get back to “ normal ” until a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ implemented .
On Fox News Sunday April 5th , Bill Gates specifically told host Chris Wallace that life “ won ’ t get back to normal ” until a vaccine is delivered to the “ entire world.
” Within days of these rather bold prescriptions from the Microsoft founder , news headlines around the world were lit ablaze with the parroted advisory that life , as we know it , is “ not expected to return to normal until a vaccine is available.
” Quoting directly from Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau during his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ normality as it was before will not come back full-on until we get a vaccine for this… ” Similarly , European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen warned the public that life can not be expected to resume any sense of former stability until a vaccine becomes widely available .
While she was initially setting an optimistic ( if you can call it that ) timeline of the Fall of 2020 , her predictions were cooled by the European Medicines Agency which suggested a more conservative arena of 12 to 18 months .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ are essentially saying the same thing ; life as we know it is not expected to return to normal until a vaccine program is in some kind of deliverable form for the entire world .
Gates himself offered 18 months as a reasonable time frame and , in the interim , his recommendations are fairly transparent .
As he explicitly stated during his CBS interview , “ the country ’ s leaders need to be clear : shutdown anywhere means shutdown everywhere.
” While these words were specifically addressed to the US , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ audience here is humanity in general .
At any rate , the narrative has been set .
As news headlines everywhere have told us , things are expected to be upside down until we are vaccinated on a nearly worldwide scale .
In the meantime , society en masse has now been successfully programmed to quietly sit still and wait out the ensuing lockdowns so that , eventually , our collective discomfort from a bleeding economy and progressive intimacy-starvation leads us to such a state of prolonged desperation where we ’ re more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and our children ’ s arms ) to the awaiting syringe .
By that time , we will have also been more than sufficiently indoctrinated in the so-called dangers of COVID-19 where we will be ready and ripened for the ‘ solution ’ to everything that has fragmented our societies since “ Wuhan ” first became a household name .
In a sobering article recently published in MIT Technology Review , Gideon Lichfield discusses his views of why social life , on a global scale , may never return to us in quite @ @ @ @ @ @ @ warns that “ as long as someone in the world has the virus , breakouts can and will keep recurring without stringent controls to contain them.
” Lichfield then proceeds to outline some rather cold possibilities of what typical life may come to look like in the future , including cell-phone location data for tracking unwitting risk offenders .
He reports that this would not be for tracking merely the infected themselves , but ultimately for “ people who ’ ve been in touch with known carriers of the virus ” .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government policies of keeping tabs on pretty much everybody through constant smart phone monitoring .
He also asserts that , “ we ’ ll restore the ability to socialize safely by developing more sophisticated ways to identify who is a disease risk and who isn ’ t , and discriminating – legally – against those who are.
” He suggests that possible methods may include universal screening of body temperature fluctuations , specific family size , and even annual income .
While noting the very likely risk of creating even more social inequities @ @ @ @ @ @ @ simply that the onus will be on government officials to reflect on the propensity for increased social dysfunction and to work hard to guard against the exacerbation of it .
In the meantime , however , Lichfield makes a repeated point that the public , in response , will somehow learn to adapt to these changes and essentially move forward with whatever form life happens to take in the aftermath of these things .
He writes that “ we ’ ll adapt to such measures , much as we ’ ve adapted to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wake of terrorist attacks.
” “ the intrusive surveillance will be considered a small price to pay for the basic freedom to be with other people.
” With these considerations in mind , he correctly points out that , “ the true cost will be borne by the poorest and weakest ” ( MIT Technology Review , March 17/20 ) .
Predictions such as these , in my mind , do not border in any way in the realm of science fiction .
In my opinion , Lichfield ’ s views appear to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when it comes to the issue of widespread public acceptance of such Orwellian approaches to social management .
His repetition of terms like “ acceptance , ” and “ adaptation ” in the context of public response lend to an overall theme of involuntary submission ; the picture of a society that essentially has no choice in the governance of their affairs and even their very personal lives .
But I suspect that content such as that covered in MIT Technology Review , while accurate on many counts , is nevertheless in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : consumer adaptation to ideals and standards established by high-level and corporate interests .
Let us be clear .
The majority of information that has been given to the international public has been fed and filtered through a severely one-sided source .
It is also no secret that the vast majority of our mainstream media is owned by a literal handful of agencies who have much to gain by steering public perception .
This oligopoly , if you will , consists primarily of AT & T , Comcast , the Walt Disney Company @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Corporation .
Together , these and their subsidiary agencies are indeed very wise in their aims to cash in on the official story of the coronavirus pandemic , primarily since stories of fear tend to sell products of distraction .
While this article is not the place to examine the depth of research and analysis which rightfully questions the nature of our current pandemic , let me simply point out the fact that any self-respecting global citizen owes it themselves to look beyond the confines of the evening news ( as well as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has taken over our cities ) and spend some time to at least review the rest of the information that experts , scientists and independent news producers are trying to share ( that is , as long as the self-righteous techno oligarchs haven ’ t removed them from their hosting platforms yet ) .
The point is that our history has patiently demonstrated to us , time and time again , that society has often hindered itself by blindly adhering to the official narrative that some persons in power have fed to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it so succinctly , “ all media exist to invest our lives with artificial perceptions and arbitrary values.
” More appropriately , then , the issue of collective values is where I want to dedicate the rest of my thoughts here .
Because , as we have experienced up until this point , it seems to me that we have allowed our shared values to become largely shaped by something most of us don ’ t even really understand properly .
All of a sudden it seems , we have found ourselves abiding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , despite how bizarre they must appear to an outside observer , are nevertheless the root of much shaming and mutual policing – principally because there have been enough corporately-paid talking heads and ill-informed leaders who are telling us that social distancing is the “ responsible ” and “ safe ” thing to do .
Ridiculous public behavior aside , my graver concern lies in the fact that our worldwide public culture now appears to have been sufficiently neutered and primed for the next stage of this whole illegitimate process .
Specifically speaking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ going to resist the call to be vaccinated once it becomes publically available ?
Will the social pressure have evolved to such an established norm where resistance will result in serious ostracizing and rejection from our familiar locales and community hubs ?
Will we be deemed “ unsafe ” and “ irresponsible ” for simply trying to preserve our personal morals of health and safety , in addition to those of our children ?
Because let ’ s face it .
If we ’ re already heckling people for stepping within our six @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will we treat those who are deemed guilty for questioning and resisting the very antidote to the thing that is widely-regarded as the very source of our problems to begin with ?
My urge is that we remind ourselves of the fact that a collective human response to any manufactured phenomenon begins with the single individual .
I dare say we will not find opportunity to resist vaccination ( or any other illegitimately-imposed custom ) if we are silently waiting for others among us to step out of line first .
The fact @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a large extent , already been lined up outside the pharmacy .
Global leadership and popular media have made sure of that .
That pharmacy is soon to be opened up and the longer we wait in line then the harder it will be to actually step out of it .
Granted , I don ’ t know exactly how the rollout of such a vaccine in this instance will look like .
I don ’ t think many of us do , really .
In all reality , it may look simply @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in certain sectors and with specific populations .
Alternatively , it will be widely promoted as the only reasonable thing to do and most will simply go along with it since too many people ( at least up until now ) have not bothered to ask the bigger questions about it .
With that in mind , I advise that we openly question the narrative that “ life as we know it will not return to normal until we ’ re all vaccinated.
” After all , we ’ re the ones buying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of it is what necessarily gives it force .
We breathe life into this type of propaganda purely through our obedience to it and by failing to question the impulses and agendas that have gone into its design .
Let me take a final moment to clarify that I ’ m not proposing that what we previously enjoyed as our baseline “ normal ” is really the ideal either .
Far from it .
Pre-COVID ‘ normal ’ is not the gold standard in my opinion , nor do I imagine that it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It was simply all we knew as a society .
In fact , one thing that our universal lockdown has served , in a positive sense , is to hopefully stimulate us on a deep , personal level to the point of re-evaluating the things in life that matter most .
Granted , some of us have resorted to binging on streaming media and mainstream news gospel ( as Viacom would no doubt have intended in the first place ) .
So rather than launching our vision purely from a place of nostalgia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ familiarity , my intention here is simply to underscore our critical importance as the ultimate deciders of our public fate .
It really comes down to what we are willing to go along with and , as far as I ’ m concerned , apathy is the most dangerous thing facing our future .
At the risk of sounding like an alarmist , the choices we make in the dawn of a questionable vaccine will go a long way in determining our continued evolution as a society .
And while I am not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ choice for vaccination , I am nevertheless insisting that one have the right to that very prized principle itself – choice that is in fact personal .
Particularly , by blindly adhering to the official prescription for mass conduct in the meantime , we are letting powerful agencies know precisely which buttons need to be pushed in order to get our species moving and behaving in the most ‘ desirable ’ way .
So yes , we do have some say in all of this .
The original source of this article is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Global Research , 2020

Would it be fair to say that the Triumph of the Beast is the dictatorial takeover of the world by the doctrines of the World Economic Forum? Has the WEF been designed by the Masters that Be to invoke worldwide Apocalypse?
The Triumph of the Beast is, or would be – if we, The People, let it happen – a full Reset of our mostly western, over-indebted, over-extended, run out-of-control financial system. It concerns mostly the dollar- and euro-based economies.
The Triumph of the Beast is, or would be – if we, The People, let it happen – a full Reset of our mostly western, over-indebted, over-extended, run out-of-control financial system. It concerns mostly the dollar- and euro-based economies. The financial reset and a new Global World Order would imply three major objectives:
A massive reduction of the world’s population, again, primarily and in a first step, the western population or Global North – many or most of them are considered by the ruling elite, “useless eaters and consumers”. Around the mid-1960s, the world’s total consumption of natural resources exceeded the factor “1” (one) of what Mother Earth is generally providing.
This over-consumption reaches today, in the early 2020s, factors 3.5 to 4.5 between Europe and the US of Mother Nature’s offerings. This refers not just to food – which, after all, is a renewable resource — but primarily to non-renewable resources, one of which is hydrocarbon. Fossil fuels in mid-2020 (the year of the COVID lockdown) accounted for 84% (87% in 2019) of all energy used worldwide. An increase of 4% was projected for 2021.
On food: As an example, Eurostat (2018) reports that in the EU about 88 million tons of food waste are generated per year, at a cost of about 143 billion euros. This corresponds to about 20% of total food produced. According to FAO, worldwide approximately a third of all food produced for human consumption is lost or wasted – see this.
A huge shift of capital and assets are transferred from the bottom and the middle class (mostly small- and medium-sized enterprises) to the top . According to Forbes, 2021 accounted for 2,755 billionaires worldwide, an increase of 660 new ones over 2020. Altogether these billionaires are worth $13.1 trillion, up from $8 trillion in 2020. These gains include increased share values – see this.
. According to Forbes, 2021 accounted for 2,755 billionaires worldwide, an increase of 660 new ones over 2020. Altogether these billionaires are worth $13.1 trillion, up from $8 trillion in 2020. These gains include increased share values – see this. Digitization of everything – including the human brain – converting humans into transhumans (Klaus Schwab). But foremost full-digitization of money which gives governments full control over your – the people’s — money. Governments or those of the planned Global Government may seize your bank account, whenever they find a reason for punishing a disobedient citizen.
This is what Klaus Schwab (WEF) calls “Governance 4.0”, congruent with what he also calls the Fourth Industrial Revolution. All-digitization allows for full control of everything. Despite all the widely propagated, so-called loosening of COVID restrictions, there are already quietly put EU laws in place which would require full vaccination of every EU citizen (EU Resolution 2361) – and an all-encompassing digital ID, without which citizens cannot move.
Similar actions are envisaged in the US. However, resistance there by the public and especially by State Governors – see especially Texas and Florida – has been greater than in Europe. And this despite President Biden’s constant pressure for “universal vaccination”. Also, US court interventions, including by the Supreme Court, have so far on several occasions sided with the people.
These digital IDs, Billy Boy’ invention Agenda ID2020, will most likely come in the form of QR codes. The QR code will also be used for making electronic / digital payments and has virtually unlimited capacity of storing information, about your health, bank accounts and other properties, consumption, habits, travels – literally, every step you take will be recorded. See also this.
The completion of this three-step – or triple-objective – agenda is the Real Goal of UN Agenda 2030. The so-called UN Development Goals, euphemistically called UN Agenda 2030, are nothing but an unrealistic smoke-screen.
As said above, if we, the People, won’t let it happen – with spiritual will-power and foremost NO FEAR – this nefarious agenda will not come to fruition.
An Alternative
Yes, a reduction of resources wasted and excessively used, is absolutely necessary. But not to be imposed by a turbo-neoliberal financial elite, WEF-style.
Also, according to FAO, there is currently, with 2020 technologies, enough food-producing capacity available in the world to nourish 12 billion people. Capacity will increase as new technologies are developed.
Inequality, poverty and famine have to do with profit-seeking food-price speculation, with a failing or inappropriate distribution system and largely with greed of the ruling classes, that prefer hoarding food for “better times”, causing shortages and famine. And now, to stress the point of “shortages”, with artificially interrupted or destroyed supply chains.
To gain back our autonomy and sovereign lives, We, the People, must take consciousness, must wake up from our comfort slumber, see through the COVID pandemic scam – and take matters into our own hands and minds. That means – without delay:
Radical deglobalization
Back to sovereign nations
Radical de-digitization of banking, finances and monetary systems
Back to economy-based and supported sovereign currencies
Respecting cultural differences
International trading and cooperation according to comparative advantages – an economic principle that gradually died with the onslaught of global, neoliberal capitalism of the 1980s – to achieve to the maximum possible “win-win” situations.
If it sounds impossible to achieve – think again.
Think back three quarters of a century, after WWII in the 1950s, when we rebuilt the war-devastated world. With the onset of the slowly and gradually US secret services imposed global ideology of the Club of Rome, of a united one government, one currency federation of multi-cultural European countries beginning in the mid-sixties European nations’ sovereignty and independence gradually melted away. This was never a European idea, but sold to and then nurtured by corrupt European colonialist “leaders” (sic).
Yes, we the People can do it; can regain our sovereign independence and peoples’ values. Absolutely without Klaus Schwab in any form or shape, and without the WEF.
*
In this Dark Cult language, the Triumph of the Beast would be preceded by the Mark of the Beast. Would that be the fake “jjab” – the instrument that brings about death and destruction? And eventually the infamous Triumph of the Beast?
There is no doubt, what is happening to humankind and even to Mother Earth, is the deed of a diabolical cult. As one of such cults’ rules, in order to succeed, they must disclose to the public – to their chosen and potential victims – what they intend to do. For decades they have complied with this rule. But, we the people didn’t see it, didn’t believe it, or were too complacent and blind in our comfort to see it.
This planned and aspired world domination by a super-rich and a super-sick elite has started decades ago, at least since WWII, probably earlier. While we could go back much further, this is just to mention a few of these open warnings within the last couple of decades.
The 2010 Rockefeller Report . It outlined in four simple steps and chapters what was planned and what would be the end-result. Starting with the “Lockstep” phase, where people would be stunned, shocked, isolated and made fearful and totally submissive to authorities (à la Naomi Klein’s “The Shock Doctrine”), from things not visible including an invisible – and never isolated – virus, all the way to the final phase of full digitization and total control.
. It outlined in four simple steps and chapters what was planned and what would be the end-result. Starting with the “Lockstep” phase, where people would be stunned, shocked, isolated and made fearful and totally submissive to authorities (à la Naomi Klein’s “The Shock Doctrine”), from things not visible including an invisible – and never isolated – virus, all the way to the final phase of full digitization and total control. Billy Boy’ February 2010 TedTalk, “Innovating to Zero” in which he infamously said: “If we are really doing a good job [jjabing], we could reduce the world population by between 10% and 15%” (about minute four of the video).
in which he infamously said: “If we are really doing a good job [jjabing], we could reduce the world population by between 10% and 15%” (about minute four of the video). The June 2016 (Swiss) Gotthard Base Tunnel Opening Ceremony, depicting a Luciferian ceremony beginning with a Lockstep scenario and ending with the total submission of the people. It was attended mostly by European politicians in lead positions – and, in hindsight, many of those who attended went to Klaus Schwab’s “academy” for Young Global Leaders. See this 6-minute video clip.
Event 201 – An open simulation of the COVID plandemic that was to come, on 18 October 2019 in NYC, organized by The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The event depicted a high-level pandemic exercise with participants from the World Bank, IMF, various agencies of the UN system, including WHO and UNICEF and many more, illustrating “areas where public / private partnerships will be necessary during the response to a severe pandemic in order to diminish large-scale economic and societal consequences.” For more details and video clips, see this.
The rest is history. In the meantime we know how large-scale economic and societal consequences were avoided or diminished. To the contrary, they were intended to hit the population as severely as possible, to cause utmost shock, fear, financial, physical and emotional damage.
The Role of the Financial Giants
They – the masters behind the WEF and above all 193 UN member countries, the collective trillionaires of this world and their (so far) all-commanding financial institutions like, BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street and Fidelity — are advancing at relentless pace on several fronts and in several dimensions.
These financial giants are largely inter-woven through mutual shareholderships and inter-changeable management positions. Together, they control some US$ 20 to 25 trillion of assets, giving them a leverage power in excess of 100 trillion dollars (the world’s 2021 GDP US$ 95 trillion, IMF estimate – see this).
With such powers it is possible to coerce, force, or blackmail everyone nation of the 193 UN members to chant and act to the tune of Big Finance, whether or not they agree with the root purpose of such coercion. Hence, WHO declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern on 30 January 2020, and a pandemic on 11 March 2020.
As we know by now, a lockdown and plandemic and all the repressive covid measures, that have nothing, but nothing to do with health, but only with the ulterior goal of installing a global One World Government with absolute and total control over everything, including all surviving citizens, In fact, making those citizens into digitally manipulable transhumans, modern slaves that own nothing but are happy (Klaus Schwab – The Great Reset).
This agenda is advancing despite people’s protests throughout the globe, and despite the “fake” loosening of covid restrictions throughout the world, predominantly the western world.
Warning
With almost all covid restrictions lifted in the western world, be aware and conscious, not to fall into the trap of illusions, that all is over now and that we are back to “normal”. This thought would be fatal. It is part of an ongoing psychological warfare. It’s a strategy to shock you again into submission, to clamp down even further in the fall, or before.
If We, the People, let it happen.
We are just entering Phase 6 of the Great Reset – full digitization: Agenda ID2020, fully integrated into the QR codification of everything, digital money – towards total and absolute control – and transhumanism.
Precursors to the final blow may be artificially produced inflation (in the US already 7% [end January 2022], expected to move into double-digits by fall 2022, or before), rising interest rates, further rising debt driven by all the COVID-induced subsidies, more “new” money put in circulation without any economic backing – all to be “balanced” and “resolved” by a (sudden) debt-wipe-out and introduction of digital money, over which governments and banks have full control on behalf of the world financial elite.
But again, only if We, the People, let it happen.
And be prepared – NOT SCARED – as part of the renewed socio-psychological fear domination, possibly the application of the “shock doctrine” through a serious disease, like Ebola, tested in West Africa in 2014. Earlier this year, French Prime Minister Jean Castex, warned of possibly postponing France’s Presidential election in April 2022, due to a possible outbreak of Marburg (Ebola) disease. Any reference to this statement has disappeared from internet. It may have been simply a fearmongering remark.
Whatever may happen, we may expect more forced “vaxxing”, more experimental “gene-therapy”, many more deaths before closure of Agenda 2030.
Nothing is beyond evil, for these un-people.
But there is nothing that cannot be successfully fought, if We the People, collectively and solidarily put our minds, conscience and spirits together.
It is never too late, in fact it is high time, to step up protests, to step up our conscious rejection of this monster tyranny that is descending on Mother Earth, threatening full annihilation of whatever democracy was left, of humanity, or at least of civilization as we know it.
We cannot idle. Time is precious and is of the essence.
If anyone still doubts that we are in the fangs of a worldwide drive towards a One World Order, a Global Government led by extraordinary financial interests, but also by a cult of power-thirsty megalomaniacs, then think again. The world is in deep trouble. If anything “globalist” has to happen, it is a global awakening. Fast.
What is occurring at ever accelerating pace, is the establishment of a global tyranny; a tyranny directed and led by the World Economic Forum. It is obvious that the financial elite and the all-controlling top financial institutions, such as BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street and Fidelity, plus some obscure multi-multi billionaires, are calling the shots. The WEF complies with an agenda well and by long-hand prepared – we are talking decades – implementing this nefarious, diabolical plan which also goes under the anodyne name of UN Agenda 2030.
Absolute must-read: Very Detailed Explanation Of The Great Reset And The New World Order.
The WEF’s Trained Global Leaders
Canada may be the beginning of absolute totalitarianism. The first WEF-led tyranny. Canada may well be an example for others to follow. Especially those countries for which the WEF selected its WEF-trained leaders.
For three decade the WEF has been “educating” young promising politicians, artists, industrialists (Volkswagen, the Coca Cola Company, BP Amoco and more) – but foremost politicians – to become so-called “Young Global Leaders” (YGL). Among those that went to Klaus Schwab’s YGL-academy, were Angela Merkel, Germany; Sarkozy, Macron, France; Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister, New Zealand; Scott Morrison, PM, Australia – and many more. But outstanding is Justin Trudeau, Canada’s Prime Minister – see this.
Learn more here: World Economic Forum’s ‘Young Global Leaders’ Is A Massive Network Of Royals, Politicians, Big Tech, Billionaires And Other ‘Elites’.
Klaus Schwab singled Trudeau out as a “model” leader who will show the world how a country can be turned into a modern “democracy” – in the age of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and in an all-digitized New World Order, as depicted by the Great Reset (Schwab). In other words, Trudeau will lead Canada not in favor of and for the benefits of the Canadian people, but for the global objectives of the WEF.
Trudeau is an instrument of the WEF. To strengthen the ties with the WEF, Trudeau is assisted by Chrystia Freeland, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, who is also on the WEF’s Board of Trustees. The Board of Trustees serves as the guardian of the World Economic Forum’s mission and values – see this.
Prime Minister Trudeau has recently invoked the Emergency Act, against the truckers’ protest and freedom convoys, actually for reasons that have nothing to do with what the Canadian Constitution specifies as reasons for invoking this totalitarian act. But so far nobody has stopped him. A majority of the Parliament supported this Emergency Measure against the people’s interest. The leader of the NDP who secured the vote in favour of the Liberal Government is also a WEF Global Leader.
You may just imagine what kind of corruption, coercion or outright blackmail and threats are in play to achieve such tyranny.
Incidentally, Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission (EC), is also a member of the WEF’s Board of Trustees, see this.
Just to show, the WEF is also in charge of the European Union. Who would have thought…?
However, the Canadian experience empowered hundreds of thousands, or millions of people across the world to stand up to their own governments and demand their freedoms be restored. Citizens in New Zealand, Australia, across Europe, and North America, after nearly two years, tolerating massive government encroachment into nearly every aspect of their lives, and after seeing how these policies were not effective at reducing the spread of COVID, finally had enough.
We shall overcome!
Venceremos!
Collectively in Solidarity.
By Peter Koenig, GlobalResearch.ca / Copyright © Peter Koenig, Global Research, 2022.


humansarefree--2020-04-28--Bill Gates and the Depopulation Agenda – Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Calls for an Investigation

For over twenty years Bill Gates and his Foundation , the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ( BMGF ) have been vaccinating foremost children by the millions in remote areas of poor countries , mostly Africa and Asia .
Most of their vaccination program had disastrous results , causing the very illness ( polio , for example in India ) and sterilizing young women ( Kenya , with modified tetanus vaccines ) .
Many of the children died .
Many of the programs were carried out with the backing of the WHO and – yes – the UN Agency responsible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Most of these vaccination campaigns were implemented without the informed-consent of the children , parents , guardians or teachers , nor with the informed-consent , or with forged consent , of the respective government authorities .
In the aftermath , The Gates Foundation was sued by governments around the world , Kenya , India , the Philippines – and more .
Bill Gates has a strange image of himself .
He sees himself as The Messiah who saves the world through vaccination – and through population reduction .
Around the time , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , with its even more infamous “ Lock Step ” Scenario , precisely the scenario of which we are living the beginning right now , Bill Gates talked on a TED show in California , “ Innovating to Zero ” about the use of energy .
He used this TED presentation to promote his vaccination programs , literally saying , “ If we are doing a real good job vaccinating childen , we can reduce the world population by 10 % to 15 % ” .
This sounds very much like eugenics .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ well : The video , the first 6 ’ 45 ” , “ The Truth about Bill Gates and his Disastrous Vaccination Program ” , will tell you all about it .
Robert F Kennedy Jr , an avid Defender of Children ’ s Rights and anti-vaccination activist , has launched a petition sent to the White House , calling for “ Investigations into the ‘ Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ’ for Medical Malpractice & Crimes Against Humanity.
” If you wish to Sign the Petition Click Here See also brief video @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) entitled The Truth about Bill Gates and his disastrous Vaccination Programs around the World : Now Mr. Gates and his allies , including Big-Pharma , WHO , UNICEF , Dr. Anthony Fauci , Director of NIAID / NIH , a close ally of Mr. Gates – and of course , Agenda ID2020 , are proposing to ( force ) vaccinate 7 billion people around the globe , with their concoction of a ( so far ) untested coronavirus vaccine .
This is a multi-billion dollar bonanza for Big Pharma and for all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will really know what the vaccine cocktail will contain .
They intend to start with the Global South ( Developing Countries ) and then gradually move North ( Developed Countries ) .
Mind you , there is no need for a vaccine to cure the corona virus .
There are many cures : French Professor Didier Raoult , who is one of the world ’ s top 5 scientists on communicable diseases , suggested the use of hydroxychloroquine ( Chloroquine or Plaquenil ) , a well-known , simple , and inexpensive drug , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that has shown efficacy with previous coronaviruses such as SARS .
By mid-February 2020 , clinical trials at his institute and in China already confirmed that the drug could reduce the viral load and bring spectacular improvement .
Chinese scientists published their first trials on more than 100 patients and announced that the Chinese National Health Commission would recommend Chloroquine in their new guidelines to treat Covid-19 .
( Peter Koenig , April 1 , 2020 ) By Peter Koenig – Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization .

In an interview with CHD Chairman RFK, Jr., Vandana Shiva warns listeners that if we don’t fight back against Gates and his empire, “They will own everything. You will own nothing … no commons, no public good, no shared values.”
by Children’s Health Defense Team
In an interview with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Vandana Shiva discusses how Billy Boy, along with Big Ag, Big Chemical, Big Food, Big Tech and Big Pharma are destroying Earth’s ecosystem and with it, our health.
Shiva, who has a Ph.D. in quantum physics, is founder of Navdanya International, an organization dedicated to protecting seed and food sovereignty, and small farmers around the world.
Kennedy, chairman and chief legal counsel for Children’s Health Defense, and Shiva discuss how the Gates empire aims to control the food system, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s quest to make this the Decade of Vaccines.
Watch the interview here:


humansarefree--2020-04-28--Coronavirus: The ‘Cures’ Will Be Worse Than the Disease

Am I talking about coronavirus ?
No !
I ’ m talking about theories about coronavirus .
It ’ s less deadly than the regular flu .
/ It ’ s worse than the Spanish Flu !
/ It ’ s flying bat AIDS !
!
The numbers are being underreported .
/ The numbers are being inflated !
It was patented in 2015 !
/ No , it really wasn ’ t .
It was unleashed by accident .
/ It was unleashed on purpose .
/ It doesn ’ t even exist !
Yes , there are as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Covid-19 ) as there are people talking about it .
The reality is that I don ’ t know the truth about what this virus really is or where it came from and neither do you .
But there ’ s something that we do know for sure regardless of where this virus came from or whether it even really exists .
The hype and fear and panic and pandemonium surrounding this ( supposed ) outbreak is going to be far worse than the disease could ever be .
Because , as I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a decade now , a bioweapon attack ( real or manmade , false flag or otherwise ) is the perfect cover for a slew of agenda items on the globalist checklist .
And the more the population panics , the more they play into the globalists ’ hands .
Here are five items on The Powers That Shouldn ’ t Be ‘ s wishlist that are being delivered on a silver platter as people scurry around panicking about coronavirus .
As Corbett Reporteers will know by now , China is in many ways @ @ @ @ @ @ @ World of the 21st century .
Social credit scores and facial recognition CCTV networks and government-controlled internet are just the most obvious examples of how governments will seek to surveil and control their populations in the future .
So it shouldn ’ t be surprising that China , as the epicenter of this new coronavirus outbreak , is pioneering new and hitherto undreamt of ways to keep their population in line during the crisis .
The first thing to note is the sheer scale of what the Chinese government is attempting here .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , encompassing a city of 11 million people , was already the largest quarantine in human history .
But when that quarantine expanded to include the entire province of Hubei — a population of 57 million people — the scope of the lockdown became nearly unimaginable .
How can such a quarantine possibly be maintained ?
Well , as we ’ ve all seen , it can be done by good old-fashioned brute force .
When in doubt , just weld the sick person ’ s door shut so they can ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ manage millions of people , you need technological help .
And so the Chinese government has been deploying every tool in its arsenal to monitor and maintain restrictions on citizens and their movements .
Flying drones to harass anyone walking around without a mask ?
Check .
A nationwide video surveillance system called — you can ’ t make this up — Skynet to help spot quarantine evaders ?
Check .
A color-coded rating on a smartphone payment app to identify people as low or high-risk for carrying the virus based on their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ If you can think of a creepy and invasive way of tracking and controlling the population , you can bet your bottom dollar that the Chinese government has already thought of it ( and is likely already using it ) .
But here ’ s the real question : When this is all over , do you think the government will simply shelve these technologies and systems ?
Or do you think that once this level of control becomes normalized that the authoritarians in the Chinese Communist Party will continue using it ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ question : Do you think there ’ s a government anywhere around the world that wouldn ’ t use this technology on its own population if given a convenient excuse ( like , say , a freakout over a novel coronavirus ) ?
The answers to these questions are obvious , but just look at the prisoner conditioning that has been taking place at the airports for the past two decades .
Even people like myself who grew up pre-9/11 can scarcely believe there was a time where you could hop on a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ through a metal detector .
What ?
You want to bring a water bottle through security !
?
What are you , crazy ?
In just two decades , the entire experience of air travel has been utterly transformed , and no declaration of victory in the so-called “ War on Terror ” will ever bring back the old security screening practices .
For the average American , the TSA if just a fact of life now .
And for those who live for long enough in a quarantine crackdown , complete government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and interactions will just be a fact of life .
These tools of control are here to stay , and the longer these quarantines last and the greater the areas effected , the further it will go in conditioning the public to accept it .
2 ) A blank check for Big Pharma and the WHO When a detective is looking to solve a crime , it ’ s important to ask cui bono .
Although it may be circumstantial , establishing who benefits from a crime at least points you to some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the question of who benefits has a simple answer : WHO benefits , of course .
The World Health Organization , that is .
As the United Nations body tasked with directing international health and leading the response to global health concerns , the WHO always grows in power in the wake of every crisis .
During the swine flu non-crisis and the ebola non-crisis and the zika non-crisis the WHO was led by Director-General Margaret Chan .
It was under Chan ’ s watch , remember , that the WHO declared @ @ @ @ @ @ @ global pandemic , ” a move that automatically triggered billions of dollars of vaccine purchases by various governments .
This was a blatant cash grab , of course , and even the Council of Europe was compelled to note that the members of the WHO council that made the pandemic declaration were also sitting on the boards of the vaccine manufacturers who stood to benefit from that decision .
With the Covid-19 outbreak , too , the WHO is playing a game with the pandemic declaration , only this time its motivation is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the World Bank issued a $ 425 billion bond in support of its Pandemic Emergency Financing Facility .
Investors in that bond issue will lose everything if a global pandemic is declared before July … a key reason , some suggest , why the WHO is refusing to call coronavirus a pandemic despite it quite clearly meeting the criteria .
So who is heading the WHO this time around ?
Well , it ’ s not Margaret Chan anymore .
She stepped down in 2017 and was replaced by Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ William Engdahl notes , is the first WHO director-general who isn ’ t even a medical doctor .
Instead , after earning his degree in biology at the University of Asmara in Eritrea and serving in a junior position at the Ministry of Health under the Marxist dictatorship of Mengistu , he : “ [ .
.
. ]
then went on to become Minister of Health from 2005 to 2012 under Prime Minister Meles Zenawi .
There he met former President Bill Clinton and began a close collaboration with Clinton and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( CHAI ) .
He also developed a close relation with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation .
As health minister , Tedros would also chair the Global Fund to Fight AIDS , Tuberculosis and Malaria that was co-founded by the Gates Foundation .
The Global Fund has been riddled with fraud and corruption scandals.
” Oh , you mean the Gates Foundation and their GAVI Alliance for vaccination that are the WHO ’ s biggest donors ?
The Gates Foundation that helped host the Event 201 “ high-level pandemic exercise ” in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out the entire coronavirus scenario we ’ re currently living through ?
Right .
And how are WHO going to save the day ?
With Big Pharma drugs , naturally !
Governments are already lining up to pledge tens of millions of dollars to fund the effort to develop a coronavirus vaccine .
And that ’ s just the funding to develop the vaccine .
There are many more billions waiting for the big pharma manufacturers who can deliver the first vaccine to market .
Yes , coronavirus is going to be a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people in the international medical mafia .
But don ’ t worry , the politicians are going to get in on the fun , too .
.
.
A decade ago , in the midst of the swine flu hype , I released an episode of The Corbett Report podcast on medical martial law .
In that episode I laid out the various ways that governments around the world ( including , of course , the US government ) have been quietly passing legislation that would enable them to implement martial law in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This would allow them to quarantine and incarcerate citizens suspected of infection , and would allow the government to administer whatever medications ( including vaccinations ) it deemed necessary to stop the spread of the infection .
In the US specifically , this legislation took the form of The Model State Emergency Health Power Act , a piece of legislation that was drafted by the Center for Disease Creation ( CDC ) .
The act grants government the power to quarantine , force vaccinate , and mobilize the military to help implement emergency @ @ @ @ @ @ @ outbreak .
It is designed to be forwarded in each state legislature so that the states could harmonize their emergency pandemic plans , essentially creating a federal system enabling medical martial law .
As the ACLU notes : “ The Act lets a governor declare a state of emergency unilaterally and without judicial oversight , fails to provide modern due process procedures for quarantine and other emergency powers , it lacks adequate compensation for seizure of assets , and contains no checks on the power to order forced treatment and vaccination.
” Regardless @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been the basis for 133 pieces of legislation in 33 different states .
And , sure enough , the citizens of the developed , Western world who thought that martial law was only for banana republics and exotic Eastern countries are about to get a taste of this bitter medicine on the back of the coronavirus hype .
Australia just activated its emergency pandemic plan despite not having a reported case of human-to-human transmission of Covid-19 .
The plan grants the government the power to cancel public events , force people to work @ @ @ @ @ @ @ otherwise impose mandates and restrictions on the daily lives of its citizens as it sees fit .
Not to be outdone , the Swiss Federal Council has just declared a “ special situation ” which allows the council to issue emergency police ordinances “ without a basis in federal law.
” Some of the powers explicitly assumed by the council include the power to mandate vaccinations , order quarantines and ban events or close institutions .
Now Britain , the US , and other countries are dusting off their own emergency plans and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ law bonanza .
Of course , this is not only the perfectly predictable response to the current outbreak hype , it was the predicted response .
That ’ s right , as noted above , the high-level exercise dubbed Event 201 that was held last October and which simulated a global coronavirus pandemic featured extensive discussion about the need to implement medical martial law in order to bring the virus in check .
Thus we saw Stephen Redd of the CDC opining during the exercise that “ governments need to be willing to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ historical perspective [ sic ] .
.
.
It ’ s really a war footing that we need to be on.
” Likewise , Brad Connett of medical supply manufacturer Henry Schein Inc declared that “ it can happen quickly .
A martial [ law ] -type plan–they may not say that , exactly–but a martial [ law ] -type plan can go into effect and stimulate change very quickly.
” It certainly can .
And what room do you believe the governments that implement martial law are going to leave for dissent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , of course .
But how are they going to stop the spread of information in this age of 24/7 always-connected social media ?
Funny you should ask , because that leads us to our next New World Order agenda item .
4 ) An excuse to crack down on the internet In New World Next Year 2020 — the annual year-end New World Next Week wrap up episode — I predicted that 2020 was going to be The End of the Internet As We ’ ve Known It !
At the time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( s ) election circus and the inevitable wave of censorship that it would bring about weighed heavily on my mind .
As it is , it ’ s quite possible that coronavirus will be the convenient excuse for governments to flex their internet censorship muscles .
Zero Hedge has already had its Twitter account suspended for posting the details of a particular Chinese scientist working in the Wuhan bio lab that some suspect was the origin of the outbreak .
This was done in the name of Twitter ’ s policy about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ given that the website did nothing more than post the already publicly available contact information for the scientist , it seems more likely that this is part of a campaign to control the narrative on coronavirus from the get go .
As I write this editorial , the front page of Google News ( which I strongly advise against using as a source of information , for the record ) is filled with “ Fact Checks ” about various coronavirus theories that are floating around the internet .
Given the current state of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doubt that governments around the world will jump at the excuse to scrub dissenting voices from the internet ?
As alternative information about the virus , its origins , and the vaccines that are intended to “ cure it ” flood the net , a propaganda campaign unlike any we have seen before will be waged to portray the purveyors of this information as a threat to public order .
They will be purged from the internet accordingly , with ( no doubt ) the approval of a large proportion of the population @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it will only be a matter of time before any information that challenges the ruling power is deemed a “ threat to public order ” and wiped from the internet .
Lest there be any doubt that the online purge is an aspect of the pandemic scenario that is particularly important to TPTSB , it should be noted that Event 201 dwelled extensively on how to “ stop the spread of misinformation.
” Their answer : Internet shutdowns and censorship , of course !
Given that I make my living online , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are worrying to me .
But before you become too distraught over the plight of the poor podcaster , let ’ s put this crisis into perspective : Assuming that the virus does go pandemic , it is quite likely that this will be the largest economic disruption of our lifetime .
This is the point where I would put forward some facts to back up such a bold statement , but given that we just saw the worst week in the markets since the financial crisis , including the worst two day @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I doubt that it ’ s really necessary to elaborate .
As mass quarantines expand , public events are canceled , businesses are shuttered , and economic activity generally grinds to a halt , it doesn ’ t take a genius to deduce that we are in for a global economic crisis of nearly unthinkable proportions .
But the real disruptions are going to start long before we get to that point .
Given that the mass quarantines have started in China , a.k.a .
the most important link in the global just-in-time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ see significant difficulties for many manufacturers producing basic consumer goods in the very near future .
Smartphones .
Cars .
Even , in a perverse bit of irony , medical supplies .
So much of the global economy that depends on Chinese manufacturing is already experiencing shutdowns and shortages .
And this is only the razor thin edge of what promises to be a gigantic wedge .
Here ’ s the worst part : These disruptions are already baked into the cake .
Even if everyone on the planet was suddenly cured of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lifted , the effects of these last few weeks of lockdowns and closures would still continue to ripple their way through the global economy for months .
But as the fear and hype spreads from continent to continent and the mass disruptions expand , these effects will get worse and worse .
I would expand on this point , but I have a feeling this is going to become a dominant and recurring topic of review in these editorials in the future .
Let me just say this for now : Regardless of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even whether it exists at all , the economic effects of this event are going to be very real and very profound .
Given that I write for the International Forecaster and have been documenting the Ponzi scheme that is the modern global economy for over a decade now , I ’ m often asked when the scam will collapse and the long-predicted global financial crisis will hit .
Well , it ’ s very possible that the crisis has now officially hit and the decades of pie-in-the-sky negative-interest-rate helicopter-funny-money insanity that has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about to come crashing down all at once .
Conclusion : Coronavirus panic is a giant boost for the globalist agenda I recently heard a suggestion that if this does eventuate into a global pandemic then it will set the globalist agenda back by decades .
After all , an event like this will surely teach us all a hard lesson in national self-sufficiency and the inherent danger of an overextended , just-in-time global supply chain , right ?
Of course not .
No , that ’ s the conclusion that a rational @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rational way would come to .
So of course the globalists are going to force feed us the exact opposite idea : That a crisis like this will demonstrate how we need even more global integration amongst all levels of public and private society .
Don ’ t believe me ?
Just read the press release that Johns Hopkins and the Event 201 participants put out last month just before “ Wuhan ” and “ coronavirus ” became topics of daily conversation : “ The next severe pandemic will not only cause great @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also trigger major cascading economic and societal consequences that could contribute greatly to global impact and suffering .
Efforts to prevent such consequences or respond to them as they unfold will require unprecedented levels of collaboration between governments , international organizations , and the private sector.
” Oh , that ’ s right .
This is another chance to “ fail forward.
” After all , as that great globalist soothsayer Rahm Emanuel told us during the last financial catastrophe , the global elitists ’ mantra is to “ never let a good @ @ @ @ @ @ @ really think this “ crisis ” ( whether real or imaginary ) would be any exception ?

‘Unless you’re able to record some of this data in a way that people can use it’s going to be difficult to go back to anything like a near normal in things like transport,’ said Tony Blair.
(LifeSiteNews) — Former U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair has called for the creation of digital IDs to track “disease status” as part of the plans for restarting international travel after the global coronavirus crisis.
Blair, who now leads the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change, said in a recorded message digital IDs were a “natural evolution of the way that we’re going to use technology in any event to transact daily life, and this covid crisis gives an additional reason for doing that.”
“I could be wrong about this, but when I can look at for example how you restart some businesses, how you restart international travel… I think people’s disease status, for example have they been tested? What is the result of that test? Have they had the disease? Do they have the disease?
“I think unless you’re able to record some of this data in a way that people can use it’s going to be difficult to go back to anything like a near normal in things like transport,” Blair said.
An article published in Forbes last month said that future air travel could involve “no cabin bags, no lounges, no automatic upgrades, face masks, surgical gloves, self-check-in, self-bag-drop-off, immunity passports, on-the-spot blood tests and sanitation disinfection tunnels.”
“Digital technologies and automation will play a critical role in the future of air travel,” Forbes predicted.
“The need to reduce ‘touchpoints’ at airports implies mandatory use of biometric boarding that allows passengers to board planes with only their face as a passport.”
The Forbes article noted that a number of airlines including British Airways, Qantas, and EasyJet are already using the technology.
Earlier this week an article published in The Guardian warned that proof of immunity to the coronavirus could be used to create “a new class system.”
“Experts predict that if [coronavirus] survivors are found to be immune, they could perform a range of jobs and services – such as volunteering in hospitals and nursing homes, caring for coronavirus patients and working in shops and food processing plants – risk-free,” journalist Miranda Bryant wrote.
“And, depending on how authorities, business and society at large respond, they could also be entitled to greater freedoms.”
Bryant pointed to Chile issuing “release certificates” to people who “complete quarantine after testing positive” for the coronavirus and comments from Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Ezekiel J Emanuel supporting the idea of immunity “certificates” or “passports.”
Emanuel is advising former Vice President and 2020 candidate Joe Biden. Fauci has been director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases for decades and is one of the top people leading President Donald Trump’s coronavirus response.
Even left-wing groups such as The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) have cautioned against plans to introduce coronavirus “immunity passports.”
In an article published last month, senior members of the ACLU argued that immunity passports could “harm public health, incentivize economically-vulnerable people to risk their health by contracting COVID-19, exacerbate racial and economic disparities, and lead to a new health surveillance infrastructure that endangers privacy rights.”
“An immunity passport system is fundamentally different from a regime whereby employers routinely test workers for COVID-19 or screen for symptoms, to ensure that no one with active infection is entering a workplace.
“In the latter system, only contagious workers are prevented from going to work and only for the period of time in which they are contagious,” the article continues.
“But an immunity passport system would divide workers into two classes — the immune and the non-immune — and the latter might never be eligible for a given job short of contracting and surviving COVID-19 if an immune worker is available to take the slot.”


humansarefree--2020-04-28--Two Emergency Medicine Doctors On Why Quarantine ‘Just Doesn’t Make Sense’

A few days ago , Dr. Dan Erickson ( former emergency-room physician ) and Dr. Artin Massihi ( emergency medicine specialist affiliated with multiple hospitals ) of Accelerated Urgent Care held a press conference explaining their belief that , based on the science and the data they have personally aggregated as physicians over the past couple of months , the current quarantine and isolation measures that ’ ve been put into place around the world don ’ t make any sense at all , at least to them .
Both of them combined have more than 40 years of experience @ @ @ @ @ @ @ below , the doctors explain their belief that not only does sheltering in place not make any sense if one wants to protect themselves from COVID , but also why sheltering in place may play a part in prolonging the disease instead of killing it .
Furthermore , they explain how some doctors are being “ pressured ” into listing deaths as a COVID death when in actuality , it ’ s not a COVID death .
This is something that has not only been expressed by them , but by multiple experts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Director of the Illinois Department of Public Health , recently stated that , even if it ’ s clear one died of an alternative cause , their death will still be marked as a COVID death .
( source ) Several doctors and professors have expressed this point , you can see more examples and read more in depth about the idea that COVID deaths are being exaggerated , here .
“ But ER doctors now , my friends that I talk to say , “ you know it ’ s interesting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ my death report I ’ m being pressured to add COVID.
” Why is that ?
Why are we being pressured to add COVID ?
To maybe increase the numbers and make it look a little bit worse than it is ?
I think so.
” – Erickson One has to ask themselves : • Why would any federal health regulatory agencies want to make it look worse than it is ?
• Why are we being told by Bill Gates and other major political figures that things won ’ t go back @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a vaccine ?
• Why are we being made to believe that nothing else will work , nothing else can work , and there are no solutions to this problem except for a vaccine ?
• We are even being told that natural immunity may not even work ?
• Why have the success of other treatments , like Hydroxychloroquine , Zinc , and intravenous Vitamin C been ridiculed and ignored ?
The doctors also explain how multiple sets of data are making it quite clear that COVID-19 also has a much higher @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rate way down into the same ballpark as seasonal influenza .
I recently wrote about USC and the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health , who just released early results from an ongoing study they are conducting on COVID-19 .
They determined , based on their data , that the infection rate in LA is in the same range as the flu , and so did another recent study from Stanford University .
You can find links to that information within that article I published a few days ago .
The two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interview below , and answer a lot of questions about why they believe that the current lockdown measures , fear and hysteria make no sense .
They also share why they feel COVID-19 is not as dangerous as it has been made it out to be .
They also suggest isolating sick , elderly and immune deficient people , while lifting measures on all other people is the best idea moving forward .
This thought was also recently expressed Dr. Knut M. Wittkowski , PhD , ScD , who headed the Department of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Rockefeller University for 20 years .
He suggested that no lockdown measures , while isolating the sick and elderly , would help create herd immunity and kill the virus faster .
You can read more about that and watch an interview with him , here .
What is the purpose of sharing this information ?
It ’ s to spark critical questioning , to not simply accept what we are constantly told in light of new information and evidence .
To let you know that it ’ s OK to question what we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ agencies .
There are a number of events and examples that continue to contribute the lack of trust the general public is showing towards these agencies as well as mainstream media networks .
Our right to share information and opinions should never be shut down .
Today , there is an Orwellian type of ‘ fact-checker ’ that ’ s been tasked with this job , which is only serving the collective and encourages them to ask , what ’ s really going on here ?

A few days ago, Dr. Dan Erickson (former emergency-room physician) and Dr. Artin Massihi (emergency medicine specialist affiliated with multiple hospitals) of Accelerated Urgent Care held a press conference explaining their belief that, based on the science and the data they have personally aggregated as physicians over the past couple of months, the current quarantine and isolation measures that’ve been put into place around the world don’t make any sense at all, at least to them.
Both of them combined have more than 40 years of experience in the field.
In the interview below, the doctors explain their belief that not only does sheltering in place not make any sense if one wants to protect themselves from COVID, but also why sheltering in place may play a part in prolonging the disease instead of killing it.
Furthermore, they explain how some doctors are being “pressured” into listing deaths as a COVID death when in actuality, it’s not a COVID death. This is something that has not only been expressed by them, but by multiple experts within the field. Dr. Ngozi Ezike, Director of the Illinois Department of Public Health, recently stated that, even if it’s clear one died of an alternative cause, their death will still be marked as a COVID death. (source)
Several doctors and professors have expressed this point, you can see more examples and read more in depth about the idea that COVID deaths are being exaggerated, here.
“But ER doctors now, my friends that I talk to say, “you know it’s interesting, when I’m writing up my death report I’m being pressured to add COVID.” Why is that? Why are we being pressured to add COVID? To maybe increase the numbers and make it look a little bit worse than it is? I think so.” – Erickson
Why Make Things Worse?
One has to ask themselves:
The doctors also explain how multiple sets of data are making it quite clear that COVID-19 also has a much higher infection rate, driving the infection mortality rate way down into the same ballpark as seasonal influenza.
I recently wrote about USC and the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, who just released early results from an ongoing study they are conducting on COVID-19.
They determined, based on their data, that the infection rate in LA is in the same range as the flu, and so did another recent study from Stanford University. You can find links to that information within that article I published a few days ago.
The two doctors go into more details in the interview below, and answer a lot of questions about why they believe that the current lockdown measures, fear and hysteria make no sense. They also share why they feel COVID-19 is not as dangerous as it has been made it out to be. They also suggest isolating sick, elderly and immune deficient people, while lifting measures on all other people is the best idea moving forward.
This thought was also recently expressed Dr. Knut M. Wittkowski, PhD, ScD, who headed the Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Research Design at Rockefeller University for 20 years.
He suggested that no lockdown measures, while isolating the sick and elderly, would help create herd immunity and kill the virus faster. You can read more about that and watch an interview with him, here.
What is the purpose of sharing this information?
It’s to spark critical questioning, to not simply accept what we are constantly told in light of new information and evidence. To let you know that it’s OK to question what we are being told by federal health regulatory agencies.
There are a number of events and examples that continue to contribute the lack of trust the general public is showing towards these agencies as well as mainstream media networks. Our right to share information and opinions should never be shut down.
Today, there is an Orwellian type of ‘fact-checker’ that’s been tasked with this job, which is only serving the collective and encourages them to ask, what’s really going on here?

By Arjun Walia, Guest writer


humansarefree--2020-04-29--Your Freedoms Don’t Have to Be Muzzled Just Because You’re Wearing a Mask

“ If 2019 was the year of the street protest , of tear gas and rubber bullets , 2020 might be the year the street protest died , or perhaps fell into a deep sleep , and went online.
” — Journalist Christopher Miller Despite all appearances to the contrary , martial law has not been declared in America .
We still have rights .
The government may act as if its police state powers suppress individual liberties during this COVID-19 pandemic , but for all intents and purposes , the Constitution — especially the battered , besieged Bill of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if not in practice .
Indeed , while federal and state governments have adopted specific restrictive measures in an effort to lockdown the nation and decelerate the spread of the COVID-19 virus , the current public health situation has not resulted in the suspension of fundamental constitutional rights such as freedom of speech and the right of assembly .
Mind you , that ’ s not to say that the government has not tried its best to weaponize this crisis as it has weaponized so many other crises in order to expand its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over the country , government officials are using COVID-19 restrictions to muzzle protesters .
It doesn ’ t matter what the protest is about ( church assemblies , the right to work , the timing for re-opening the country , discontent over police brutality , etc . )
: this is activity the First Amendment protects vociferously with only one qualification — that it be peaceful .
Yet even peaceful protesters mindful of the need to adhere to social distancing guidelines because of this COVID-19 are being muzzled , arrested and fined .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ reportedly threatened with up to a year in jail and a $ 5000 fine if they dared to publicly protest the injustice of their son ’ s execution by a SWAT team .
If anyone had a legitimate reason to get out in the streets and protest , it ’ s the Lemp family , whose 21-year-old son Duncan was gunned down in his bedroom during an early morning , no-knock SWAT team raid on his family ’ s home .
It was 4:30 a.m. on March 12 , 2020 , in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ most of the country under a partial lockdown and sheltering at home , when this masked SWAT team — deployed to execute a “ high risk ” search warrant for unauthorized firearms — stormed the suburban house where 21-year-old Duncan , a software engineer and Second Amendment advocate , lived with his parents and 19-year-old brother .
The entire household , including Lemp and his girlfriend , was reportedly asleep when the SWAT team directed flash bang grenades and gunfire through Lemp ’ s bedroom window .
Lemp was killed and his girlfriend @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that morning , including Lemp , had a criminal record .
No one in the house that morning , including Lemp , was considered an “ imminent threat ” to law enforcement or the public , at least not according to the search warrant .
Now what was so urgent that militarized police felt compelled to employ battlefield tactics in the pre-dawn hours of a day when most people are asleep in bed , not to mention stuck at home as part of a nationwide lockdown ?
According to police , they were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of “ firearms.
” So instead of approaching the house by the front door at a reasonable hour in order to investigate this complaint — which is what the Fourth Amendment requires — police instead strapped on their guns , loaded up their flash bang grenades and acted like battle-crazed warriors .
This is the blowback from all that military weaponry flowing to domestic police departments .
This is what happens when you use SWAT teams to carry out routine search warrants .
This is what happens when you adopt red flag gun @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , painting anyone who might be in possession of a gun — legal or otherwise — as a threat that must be neutralized .
These red flag gun laws allow the police to remove guns from people merely suspected of being threats .
While in theory it appears perfectly reasonable to want to “ stop dangerous people before they act , ” where the problem arises is when you put the power to determine who is a potential danger in the hands of government agencies , the courts and the police .
Remember @ @ @ @ @ @ @ uses the words “ anti-government , ” “ extremist ” and “ terrorist ” interchangeably .
This is the same government whose agents are spinning a sticky spider-web of threat assessments , behavioral sensing warnings , flagged “ words , ” and “ suspicious ” activity reports using automated eyes and ears , social media , behavior sensing software , and citizen spies to identify potential threats .
This is the same government that keeps re-upping the National Defense Authorization Act ( NDAA ) , which allows the military to arrest and detain @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , family or the courts if the government believes them to be a threat .
This is the same government that has a growing list—shared with fusion centers and law enforcement agencies—of ideologies , behaviors , affiliations and other characteristics that could flag someone as suspicious and result in their being labeled potential enemies of the state .
Let that sink in a moment .
If you believe in and exercise your rights under the Constitution ( namely , your right to speak freely , worship freely , associate with like-minded individuals who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government , own a weapon , demand a warrant before being questioned or searched , or any other activity viewed as potentially anti-government , racist , bigoted , anarchic or sovereign ) , you are most likely at the top of the government ’ s terrorism watch list .
Moreover , as a New York Times editorial warns , you may be an anti-government extremist ( a.k.a .
domestic terrorist ) in the eyes of the police if you are afraid that the government is plotting to confiscate your firearms , if you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the government will soon declare martial law , or if you display an unusual number of political and/or ideological bumper stickers on your car .
Needless to say , if you happen to be passionate about the Constitution and a vocal critic of government corruption , you ’ ve already been flagged in a government database somewhere .
Likely , Lemp was , too .
Now Lemp is dead and his family is devastated , outraged and desperate to make sense of what appears to be an insensible act of violence resulting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ As usual in these kinds of shootings , government officials have not been forthcoming with details about the shooting : police have refused to meet with family members , the contents of the warrant supporting the raid have not been revealed , and bodycam footage of the raid has not been disclosed .
So in order to voice their objections to police violence and demand answers about the shooting , Lemp ’ s family and friends planned to conduct an outdoor public demonstration — adhering to social distancing guidelines — only to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ jail and a $ 5000 fine for violating Maryland ’ s stay at home orders .
Yet here ’ s the thing : we don ’ t have to be muzzled and remain silent about government corruption , violence and misconduct just because we ’ re wearing masks and social distancing .
That ’ s not the point of this whole COVID-19 exercise , or is it ?
While there is a moral responsibility to not endanger other lives with our actions , that does not mean relinquishing all of our freedoms .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ freedoms , but don ’ t allow yourselves to be muzzled or your individual freedoms to be undermined .
Understandably , no one wants to talk about individual freedoms when tens of thousands of people the world over are dying , and yet we must .
The decisions we make right now — about freedom , commerce , free will , how we care for the least of these in our communities , what it means to provide individuals and businesses with a safety net , how far we allow the government to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this virus , etc .
— will haunt us for a long time to come .
At times like these , when emotions are heightened , fear dominates , common sense is in short supply , liberty takes a backseat to public safety , and democratic societies approach the tipping point towards mob rule , there is a tendency to cast those who exercise their individual freedoms ( to freely speak , associate , assemble , protest , pursue a living , engage in commerce , etc . )
as foolishly reckless , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sometimes that is true , but not always .
As I make clear in my book Battlefield America : The War on the American People , there is always a balancing test between individual freedoms and the communal good .
What we must figure out is how to strike a balance that allows us to protect those who need protecting without leaving us chained and in bondage to the police state .
We must find ways to mitigate against this contagion needlessly claiming any more lives and crippling any more communities , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : blindly following the path of least resistance — acquiescing without question to whatever the government dictates — can only lead to more misery , suffering and the erection of a totalitarian regime in which there is no balance .
By John W. Whitehead , constitutional attorney , author , and founder and president of The Rutherford Institute

“If 2019 was the year of the street protest, of tear gas and rubber bullets, 2020 might be the year the street protest died, or perhaps fell into a deep sleep, and went online.” — Journalist Christopher Miller
Despite all appearances to the contrary, martial law has not been declared in America.
We still have rights.
Technically, at least.
The government may act as if its police state powers suppress individual liberties during this COVID-19 pandemic, but for all intents and purposes, the Constitution — especially the battered, besieged Bill of Rights — still stands in theory, if not in practice.
Indeed, while federal and state governments have adopted specific restrictive measures in an effort to lockdown the nation and decelerate the spread of the COVID-19 virus, the current public health situation has not resulted in the suspension of fundamental constitutional rights such as freedom of speech and the right of assembly.
Mind you, that’s not to say that the government has not tried its best to weaponize this crisis as it has weaponized so many other crises in order to expand its powers and silence its critics.
All over the country, government officials are using COVID-19 restrictions to muzzle protesters.
It doesn’t matter what the protest is about (church assemblies, the right to work, the timing for re-opening the country, discontent over police brutality, etc.): this is activity the First Amendment protects vociferously with only one qualification — that it be peaceful.
Yet even peaceful protesters mindful of the need to adhere to social distancing guidelines because of this COVID-19 are being muzzled, arrested and fined.
For example, a Maryland family was reportedly threatened with up to a year in jail and a $5000 fine if they dared to publicly protest the injustice of their son’s execution by a SWAT team.
If anyone had a legitimate reason to get out in the streets and protest, it’s the Lemp family, whose 21-year-old son Duncan was gunned down in his bedroom during an early morning, no-knock SWAT team raid on his family’s home.
Imagine it.
It was 4:30 a.m. on March 12, 2020, in the midst of a COVID-19 pandemic that has most of the country under a partial lockdown and sheltering at home, when this masked SWAT team — deployed to execute a “high risk” search warrant for unauthorized firearms — stormed the suburban house where 21-year-old Duncan, a software engineer and Second Amendment advocate, lived with his parents and 19-year-old brother.
The entire household, including Lemp and his girlfriend, was reportedly asleep when the SWAT team directed flash bang grenades and gunfire through Lemp’s bedroom window.
Lemp was killed and his girlfriend injured.
No one in the house that morning, including Lemp, had a criminal record.
No one in the house that morning, including Lemp, was considered an “imminent threat” to law enforcement or the public, at least not according to the search warrant.
Now what was so urgent that militarized police felt compelled to employ battlefield tactics in the pre-dawn hours of a day when most people are asleep in bed, not to mention stuck at home as part of a nationwide lockdown?
According to police, they were tipped off that Lemp was in possession of “firearms.”
So instead of approaching the house by the front door at a reasonable hour in order to investigate this complaint — which is what the Fourth Amendment requires — police instead strapped on their guns, loaded up their flash bang grenades and acted like battle-crazed warriors.
This is the blowback from all that military weaponry flowing to domestic police departments.
This is what happens when you use SWAT teams to carry out routine search warrants.
This is what happens when you adopt red flag gun laws, which Maryland did in 2018, painting anyone who might be in possession of a gun — legal or otherwise — as a threat that must be neutralized.
These red flag gun laws allow the police to remove guns from people merely suspected of being threats.
While in theory it appears perfectly reasonable to want to “stop dangerous people before they act,” where the problem arises is when you put the power to determine who is a potential danger in the hands of government agencies, the courts and the police.
Remember, this is the same government that uses the words “anti-government,” “extremist” and “terrorist” interchangeably.
This is the same government whose agents are spinning a sticky spider-web of threat assessments, behavioral sensing warnings, flagged “words,” and “suspicious” activity reports using automated eyes and ears, social media, behavior sensing software, and citizen spies to identify potential threats.
This is the same government that keeps re-upping the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which allows the military to arrest and detain American citizens with no access to friends, family or the courts if the government believes them to be a threat.
This is the same government that has a growing list—shared with fusion centers and law enforcement agencies—of ideologies, behaviors, affiliations and other characteristics that could flag someone as suspicious and result in their being labeled potential enemies of the state.
Let that sink in a moment.
If you believe in and exercise your rights under the Constitution (namely, your right to speak freely, worship freely, associate with like-minded individuals who share your political views, criticize the government, own a weapon, demand a warrant before being questioned or searched, or any other activity viewed as potentially anti-government, racist, bigoted, anarchic or sovereign), you are most likely at the top of the government’s terrorism watch list.
Moreover, as a New York Times editorial warns, you may be an anti-government extremist (a.k.a. domestic terrorist) in the eyes of the police if you are afraid that the government is plotting to confiscate your firearms, if you believe the economy is about to collapse and the government will soon declare martial law, or if you display an unusual number of political and/or ideological bumper stickers on your car.
Needless to say, if you happen to be passionate about the Constitution and a vocal critic of government corruption, you’ve already been flagged in a government database somewhere.
Likely, Lemp was, too.
Now Lemp is dead and his family is devastated, outraged and desperate to make sense of what appears to be an insensible act of violence resulting in an inexcusable loss of life.
As usual in these kinds of shootings, government officials have not been forthcoming with details about the shooting: police have refused to meet with family members, the contents of the warrant supporting the raid have not been revealed, and bodycam footage of the raid has not been disclosed.
So in order to voice their objections to police violence and demand answers about the shooting, Lemp’s family and friends planned to conduct an outdoor public demonstration — adhering to social distancing guidelines — only to be threatened with arrest, a year in jail and a $5000 fine for violating Maryland’s stay at home orders.
Yet here’s the thing: we don’t have to be muzzled and remain silent about government corruption, violence and misconduct just because we’re wearing masks and social distancing.
That’s not the point of this whole COVID-19 exercise, or is it?
While there is a moral responsibility to not endanger other lives with our actions, that does not mean relinquishing all of our freedoms.
Be responsible in how you exercise your freedoms, but don’t allow yourselves to be muzzled or your individual freedoms to be undermined.
Understandably, no one wants to talk about individual freedoms when tens of thousands of people the world over are dying, and yet we must.
The decisions we make right now — about freedom, commerce, free will, how we care for the least of these in our communities, what it means to provide individuals and businesses with a safety net, how far we allow the government to go in “protecting” us against this virus, etc. — will haunt us for a long time to come.
At times like these, when emotions are heightened, fear dominates, common sense is in short supply, liberty takes a backseat to public safety, and democratic societies approach the tipping point towards mob rule, there is a tendency to cast those who exercise their individual freedoms (to freely speak, associate, assemble, protest, pursue a living, engage in commerce, etc.) as foolishly reckless, criminally selfish, or outright villains.
Sometimes that is true, but not always.
As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, there is always a balancing test between individual freedoms and the communal good.
What we must figure out is how to strike a balance that allows us to protect those who need protecting without leaving us chained and in bondage to the police state.
We must find ways to mitigate against this contagion needlessly claiming any more lives and crippling any more communities, but let’s not lose our heads: blindly following the path of least resistance — acquiescing without question to whatever the government dictates — can only lead to more misery, suffering and the erection of a totalitarian regime in which there is no balance.
By John W. Whitehead, constitutional attorney, author, and founder and president of The Rutherford Institute


humansarefree--2020-04-29--Ron Paul: Next in Coronavirus Tyranny: Forced Vaccinations and ‘Digital Certificates’

In my first week in the House of Representatives in 1976 , I cast one of the two votes against legislation appropriating funds for a swine flu vaccination program .
A swine flu outbreak was then dominating headlines , so most in DC were frantic to “ do something ” about the virus .
Unfortunately , the hastily developed and rushed-into-production swine flu vaccine was not only ineffective , it was dangerous .
Approximately 50 people who received the vaccine subsequently contracted Guillain-Barré syndrome , a potentially fatal form of paralysis .
According to an expert with the Centers for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was four times higher among those who received the swine flu vaccine than in the general population .
That sad history may soon repeat itself .
Right now , governments and private industries are working to rapidly develop and deploy a coronavirus vaccine .
Microsoft founder Bill Gates , who is a major funder of these efforts , has suggested everyone who receives a vaccine be issued a “ digital certificate ” proving he has been vaccinated .
Dr. Anthony Fauci , whose record of wrong predictions makes him the Bill Kristol of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ some proof they have been vaccinated .
Another authoritarian proposal floated to deal with coronavirus is to force everyone to download a phone app that will track their movements .
This would allow government officials to identify those who may have been near anyone who may have had coronavirus .
Such mandatory “ contact tracing ” is an assault on our privacy and liberty .
Vaccines can improve health .
For example , vaccines helped reduce the incidence of diseases like polio .
But not all vaccines are safe and effective for all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , such as giving infants multiple vaccines at one time , may cause health problems .
The fact that vaccines may benefit some people , or even most people , does not justify government forcing individuals to be vaccinated .
It also does not justify vaccinating children against their parents ’ wishes .
And it certainly does not justify keeping individuals and families in involuntary quarantine because they do not have “ digital certificates ” proving they have had their shots .
If government can force individuals to receive medical treatment against their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ why government can not force individuals to buy medical insurance , prohibit them from owning firearms , dictate their terms of employment , and prevent them from taking arguably harmful actions like smoking marijuana or drinking raw milk .
Similarly , if government can override parents ’ wishes regarding medical treatment for their children , then there is no reason why government can not usurp parental authority in other areas , such as education .
Proponents of mandatory vaccines and enhanced surveillance are trying to blackmail the American people by arguing that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a healthcare surveillance state and make vaccination mandatory .
The growing number of Americans who are tired of not being able to go to work , school , or church , or even to take their children to a park because of government mandates should reject this “ deal.
” Instead , they should demand an immediate end to the lockdowns and the restoration of individual responsibility for deciding how best to protect their health .

In my first week in the House of Representatives in 1976, I cast one of the two votes against legislation appropriating funds for a swine flu vaccination program.
A swine flu outbreak was then dominating headlines, so most in DC were frantic to “do something” about the virus.
Unfortunately, the hastily developed and rushed-into-production swine flu jjab was not only ineffective, it was dangerous. Approximately 50 people who received the jjab subsequently contracted Guillain-Barré syndrome, a potentially fatal form of paralysis.
According to an expert with the Centers for Disease Control, the incidence of Guillain-Barré was four times higher among those who received the swine flu jjab than in the general population.
That sad history may soon repeat itself. Right now, governments and private industries are working to rapidly develop and deploy a coronavirus jjab.
Microsoft founder Billy Boy, who is a major funder of these efforts, has suggested everyone who receives a jjab be issued a “digital certificate” proving he has been vaccinated.
Dr. Anthony Fauci, whose record of wrong predictions makes him the Bill Kristol of epidemiology, also wants individuals to carry some proof they have been vaccinated.
Another authoritarian proposal floated to deal with coronavirus is to force everyone to download a phone app that will track their movements.
This would allow government officials to identify those who may have been near anyone who may have had coronavirus. Such mandatory “contact tracing” is an assault on our privacy and liberty.
Vaccines can improve health. For example, jjabs helped reduce the incidence of diseases like polio. But not all jjabs are safe and effective for all people. Furthermore, certain modern practices, such as giving infants multiple jjabs at one time, may cause health problems.
The fact that jjabs may benefit some people, or even most people, does not justify government forcing individuals to be vaccinated. It also does not justify jjabing children against their parents’ wishes.
And it certainly does not justify keeping individuals and families in involuntary quarantine because they do not have “digital certificates” proving they have had their shots.
If government can force individuals to receive medical treatment against their will, then there is no reason why government cannot force individuals to buy medical insurance, prohibit them from owning firearms, dictate their terms of employment, and prevent them from taking arguably harmful actions like smoking marijuana or drinking raw milk.
Similarly, if government can override parents’ wishes regarding medical treatment for their children, then there is no reason why government cannot usurp parental authority in other areas, such as education.
Proponents of mandatory jjabs and enhanced surveillance are trying to blackmail the American people by arguing that the lockdown cannot end unless we create a healthcare surveillance state and make vaccination mandatory.
The growing number of Americans who are tired of not being able to go to work, school, or church, or even to take their children to a park because of government mandates should reject this “deal.”
Instead, they should demand an immediate end to the lockdowns and the restoration of individual responsibility for deciding how best to protect their health.
By Ron Paul, Guest writer