humansarefree--2020-05-21--FTC Shuts Down Dr. Brownstein’s Blog for Explaining How He was Curing COVID-19 Patients

We have featured the articles published by Michigan physician Dr. David Brownstein for many years here at Health Impact News .
But we were just notified that his blog has been shut down , apparently to suppress the information he was publishing that went against Big Pharma and their narrative regarding COVID-19 .
As we have previously reported , Dr. Brownstein has had tremendous success treating COVID-19 patients successfully with holistic non-pharmaceutical methods .
According to a notice put up on his website , the FTC ordered him to stop blogging : Dear CHM Patients- I want to let you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the FTC to stop making any statements about our treatment protocols of Vitamins A , C and D as well as nutritional IV ’ s , iodine , ozone and nebulization to support the immune system with respect to Coronavirus Diseases 2019 ( COVID-19 ) .
According to this letter : “ It is unlawful under the FTC Act , 15 U.S.C Sec .
41 et seq .
to advertise that a product or service can prevent , treat , or cure human disease unless you possess competent and reliable scientific evidence , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ clinical studies , substantiating that the claims are true at the time they are made .
“ For COVID-19 , no such study is currently known to exist for the products or services identified above .
Thus , any Coronavirus-related prevention or treatment claims regarding such products or services are not supported by competent and reliable scientific evidence .
You must immediately cease making all such claims.
” What this means is that I will not be able to blog , post , tweet , email , etc .
for awhile .
I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ NOT closing .
I am still here and so are my colleagues .
It is my honor to be your doctor .
To All Our Health !
~DrB The articles we have published on our website authored by Dr. Brownstein remain , and are protected under the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States .
Unfortunately , as a licensed physician , Dr. Brownstein has stricter regulations on what he can publish since he charges for his services .
This does NOT mean he has done anything wrong or illegal , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the time nor resources to fight this in court right now , where he would probably win on Constitutional grounds .
This was one of Dr. Brownstein ’ s last blog entries regarding the wearing of masks , which criticized Governor Whitmer ( which is NOT illegal ! )
.
We Must Wear Face Masks ?
Show Me the Science Behind That !
Folks , I have been writing to you about COVID for over a month .
It is been a painful time period for all of us .
What is really @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are being fostered on us without any good scientific evidence to back them up .
One of those requirements that has me irritated is the use of face coverings that I see so prevalent out there .
When I go to Costco , 95 % of the people in the store are wearing face masks .
Why is that ?
The Governor of Michigan recently released an edict requiring that citizens wear a face covering when in any enclosed public space .
It specifically states , “ Any individual able to medically tolerate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over his or her nose and mouth—such as a homemade mask , scarf , bandana , or handkerchief—when in any enclosed public space.
” Later in the edict , it states , “ Supplies of N95 masks and surgical masks should generally be reserved , for now , for health care professionals , first responders and other critical workers who interact with the public.
” It should be well known that cloth masks , bandanas , or handkerchiefs will do very little to stop the spread of coronavirus .
In fact , they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ill from corona and other influenza-like illnesses .
A 2015 study found cloth masks , when compared to surgical masks , increase the rate of influenza-like illnesses 13x !
( 1 ) Cloth masks are probably best avoided and should not be reused without properly sanitizing them .
Regular surgical masks are not much better in this situation .
The COVID-19 virus is 0.125 µm in size .
Surgical masks have been shown to not adequately filter against aerosols measuring from 0.9-3.1 µm .
( 2 ) Other researchers have shown that particles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
( 3 ) A 2020 study in Seoul , South Korea looked at the effectiveness of surgical and cotton masks in blocking COVID-19 in a controlled comparison of four patients .
( 4 ) The COVID-infected patients were put in negative pressure isolated rooms .
The scientists compared disposable surgical masks ( 3 layers ) with reusable cotton masks .
Patients were instructed to cough 5 times while wearing no mask , surgical mask , or cotton mask .
Interestingly , all swabs from the outer masks—including surgical masks—were positive for COVID-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be contaminated .
That means the mask did not effectively filter out the COVID virus since it is too small .
The authors state , “ Neither surgical nor cotton masks effectively filtered { COVID-19 } during coughs by infected patients.
” The study also reported greater contamination on the outer than the inner mask ( both surgical and cotton ) surfaces .
The authors claim that the mask is either allowing the virus to cross from the inner to the outer surface because the virus is too small or the aerodynamic feature @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
A turbulent jet due to air leakage around the mask edge could contaminate the outer surface .
We have made far too many political decisions in the COVID crisis based on fear and not on reliable data .
Here is a perfect example of another one : everyone must wear a mask when inside any public place .
Should you wear a mask ?
If you are coughing or sick , my answer is yes .
A surgical mask , and to a lesser extent a cotton mask , will block large @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should we dictate to healthy people that they are required to wear a mask—cotton or surgical—when in any public enclosed space ?
Someone show me the science supporting the Executive Order by the Governor of Michigan .
And Governor Whitmer wonders why so many of us are annoyed .
To All Our Health , ~DrB Addendum : A further annoyance is my lack of success in getting masks—both N95 and surgical masks– for my staff to use when we are treating COVID patients .
Perhaps the Governor should release an executive order helping @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
We have had masks , gowns and face shields on order for over two months .
That is beyond annoying .

by Brian Shilhavy, Health Impact News
We have featured the articles published by Michigan physician Dr. David Brownstein for many years here at Health Impact News.
But we were just notified that his blog has been shut down, apparently to suppress the information he was publishing that went against Big Pharma and their narrative regarding COVID-19.
As we have previously reported, Dr. Brownstein has had tremendous success treating COVID-19 patients successfully with holistic non-pharmaceutical methods.
According to a notice put up on his website, the FTC ordered him to stop blogging:
Dear CHM Patients-
I want to let you know that we have been ordered by the FTC to stop making any statements about our treatment protocols of Vitamins A, C and D as well as nutritional IV’s, iodine, ozone and nebulization to support the immune system with respect to Coronavirus Diseases 2019 (COVID-19).
According to this letter:
“It is unlawful under the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C Sec. 41 et seq. to advertise that a product or service can prevent, treat, or cure human disease unless you possess competent and reliable scientific evidence, including, when appropriate, well-controlled human clinical studies, substantiating that the claims are true at the time they are made.
“For COVID-19, no such study is currently known to exist for the products or services identified above. Thus, any Coronavirus-related prevention or treatment claims regarding such products or services are not supported by competent and reliable scientific evidence. You must immediately cease making all such claims.”
What this means is that I will not be able to blog, post, tweet, email, etc. for awhile.
I want you to know that CHM is NOT closing. I am still here and so are my colleagues. It is my honor to be your doctor.
To All Our Health! ~DrB
The articles we have published on our website authored by Dr. Brownstein remain, and are protected under the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.
Unfortunately, as a licensed physician, Dr. Brownstein has stricter regulations on what he can publish since he charges for his services.
This does NOT mean he has done anything wrong or illegal, it just probably means he has neither the time nor resources to fight this in court right now, where he would probably win on Constitutional grounds.
This was one of Dr. Brownstein’s last blog entries regarding the wearing of masks, which criticized Governor Whitmer (which is NOT illegal!).
We Must Wear Face Masks? Show Me the Science Behind That!
by Dr. Brownstein
Folks, I have been writing to you about COVID for over a month. It is been a painful time period for all of us.
What is really sad is that too many political dictates are being fostered on us without any good scientific evidence to back them up. One of those requirements that has me irritated is the use of face coverings that I see so prevalent out there.
When I go to Costco, 95% of the people in the store are wearing face masks.
Why is that?
The Governor of Michigan recently released an edict requiring that citizens wear a face covering when in any enclosed public space.
It specifically states, “Any individual able to medically tolerate a face covering must wear a covering over his or her nose and mouth—such as a homemade mask, scarf, bandana, or handkerchief—when in any enclosed public space.”
Later in the edict, it states, “Supplies of N95 masks and surgical masks should generally be reserved, for now, for health care professionals, first responders and other critical workers who interact with the public.”
It should be well known that cloth masks, bandanas, or handkerchiefs will do very little to stop the spread of coronavirus. In fact, they may actually increase your risk of becoming ill from corona and other influenza-like illnesses.
A 2015 study found cloth masks, when compared to surgical masks, increase the rate of influenza-like illnesses 13x! (1) Cloth masks are probably best avoided and should not be reused without properly sanitizing them.
Regular surgical masks are not much better in this situation. The COVID-19 virus is 0.125 µm in size. Surgical masks have been shown to not adequately filter against aerosols measuring from 0.9-3.1 µm. (2)
Other researchers have shown that particles from 0.04-0.2 µm can penetrate surgical masks. (3)
A 2020 study in Seoul, South Korea looked at the effectiveness of surgical and cotton masks in blocking COVID-19 in a controlled comparison of four patients. (4)
The COVID-infected patients were put in negative pressure isolated rooms. The scientists compared disposable surgical masks (3 layers) with reusable cotton masks.
Patients were instructed to cough 5 times while wearing no mask, surgical mask, or cotton mask. Interestingly, all swabs from the outer masks—including surgical masks—were positive for COVID-19.
Inner masks were also found to be contaminated. That means the mask did not effectively filter out the COVID virus since it is too small. The authors state, “Neither surgical nor cotton masks effectively filtered {COVID-19} during coughs by infected patients.”
The study also reported greater contamination on the outer than the inner mask (both surgical and cotton) surfaces.
The authors claim that the mask is either allowing the virus to cross from the inner to the outer surface because the virus is too small or the aerodynamic feature of a mask could explain this finding. A turbulent jet due to air leakage around the mask edge could contaminate the outer surface.
We have made far too many political decisions in the COVID crisis based on fear and not on reliable data. Here is a perfect example of another one: everyone must wear a mask when inside any public place.
Should you wear a mask? If you are coughing or sick, my answer is yes. A surgical mask, and to a lesser extent a cotton mask, will block large droplets from being spread.
However, should we dictate to healthy people that they are required to wear a mask—cotton or surgical—when in any public enclosed space? Someone show me the science supporting the Executive Order by the Governor of Michigan. And Governor Whitmer wonders why so many of us are annoyed.
To All Our Health,
~DrB
Addendum: A further annoyance is my lack of success in getting masks—both N95 and surgical masks– for my staff to use when we are treating COVID patients. Perhaps the Governor should release an executive order helping us get the PPE equipment we need. We have had masks, gowns and face shields on order for over two months. That is beyond annoying.
(1) BMJ Open. 2015:5:e006577.
(2) Am. J Infect. Contol. 2008:36:276-282
(3) Ann.Occup. Hyg. 2008:52:177-85
(4) Annals of Int. Med. Letter. IBID. April 6, 2020.


humansarefree--2020-05-21--Bill 6666: Are Americans About to Lose All Medical Rights?

In 1965 , scientists identified the first human coronavirus ; it was associated with the common cold .
The Coronavirus family , named for their crown-like appearance , currently includes 36 viruses .
Within that group , there are 4 common viruses that have been causing infection in humans for more than sixty years .
In addition , three pandemic coronaviruses that can infect humans : SARS , MERS , and now , SARS-CoV-2 .
As the news of deaths in China , South Korea , Italy , and Iran began to saturate every form of media 24/7 , we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID-19 .
To be clear , the name of the newly identified coronavirus is SARS-CoV-2 , short for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 .
This virus is associated with fever , cough , chest pain , and shortness of breath , the complex of symptoms that form the diagnosis of COVID-19 .
The Trump administration declared a public health emergency on January 31 , 2020 , then on February 2 placed a ban on the entry of most travelers who had recently been in China .
On February 4 , Alex Azar , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( HHS ) issued a declaration of public health emergency and activated the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act , otherwise known as the PREP Act .
This nefarious legislation provides complete protection of manufacturers from liability for products , technologies , biologics , or any vaccine developed as a medical countermeasure against COVID-19 .
For those nervously waiting for the vaccine to become available , be sure to understand the PREP Act before rushing to the get in line .
Calls for testing – to see if a person is or isn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the emergency was declared , but performing those tests was initially slow due to an inadequate number of test kits .
As the kits became available , those developed by the CDC had a defect : The reagents reacted to the negative control sample , making the test inaccurate and the kits unusable .
In various countries , thousands of test kits purchased from China were found to be contaminated with the SARS-CoV-2 viruses .
No one really knows how that happened , but theories spread like wildfire .
Could the test kit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , did it mean the test would return a false-positive result , driving up the numbers of those said to be infected so those in power could implement stronger lockdowns and accelerate the hockey-stick unemployment rates ?
Neither of those questions has been adequately answered .
Authorities claim that testing is important for public health officials to assess if their mitigation efforts – “ shelter in place ” and “ social distancing ” and “ wearing a mask ” – are making a difference to “ flatten the curve.
” Officials also claim @ @ @ @ @ @ @ many persons are infected within a community and to understand the nature of how coronaviruses spread .
Are these reasons sufficient to give up our health freedom and our personal rights , being tested and shamed in public ?
Despite the challenges with test kits , testing began .
By the end of March 2020 , more than 1 million people had been tested across the US .
By May 9 , the number tested had grown to over 8.7M .
Testing methods include a swab of the nasal passages or by inserting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nose to scrape the back of the throat .
Specimens have also been obtained bronchoalveolar lavage , from sputum , and from stool specimens .
The call for mandatory testing has been gathering steam and becoming ever more onerous .
In Washington state , Governor Inslee has declared : Individuals that refuse to cooperate with contact tracers and/or refuse testing , those individuals will not be allowed to leave their homes to purchase basic necessities such as groceries and/or prescriptions .
Those persons will need to make arrangements through friends , family , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ personnel .
But what do the results really mean ?
Who Should Be Tested On May 8 , 2020 , the CDC has listed specific priorities for when testing should be done .
As of May 16 , more than 11-million samples have been collected and more than 3700 specimens have not yet been evaluated .
• Healthcare facility workers , workers in living settings , and first responders with symptoms • Residents in long-term care facilities or other congregate living settings , including prisons and shelters , with symptoms • Persons with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fever , cough , shortness of breath , chills , muscle pain , new loss of taste or smell , vomiting or diarrhea , and/or sore throat • Persons without symptoms who are prioritized by health departments or clinicians , for any reason , including but not limited to public health monitoring , sentinel surveillance , or screening of asymptomatic individuals according to state and local plans .
Read that last priority again : That means virtually everyone can be required to get a test .
Is that a violation of your personal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to testing , what does a “ positive test ” actually mean ?
PCR , short for polymerase chain reaction , is a highly specific laboratory technique .
The key to understanding PCR testing is that PCR can identify an individual specific virus within a viral family .
However , a PCR test can only be used to identify DNA viruses ; the SARS-CoV2 virus is an RNA virus .
Therefore , multiple steps must be taken to “ magnify ” the amount of genetic material in the specimen .
Researchers used a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reaction , to specifically identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus .
It ’ s a complicated process .
To read more about it , go here and here .
If a nasal or a blood sample contains a tiny snip of RNA from the SARS-CoV-2 virus , RT-PCR can identify it , leading to a high probability that the person has been exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 virus .
However – and this is important – a positive RT-PCR test result does not necessarily indicate a full virus is present .
The virus must be fully @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Even if a person has had all the symptoms associated with a coronavirus infection or has been closely exposed to persons who have been diagnosed with COVID-19 , the probability of a RT-PCR test being positive decreases with the number of days past the onset of symptoms .
According to a study done by Paul Wikramaratna and others : • For a nasal swab , the percentage chance of a positive test declines from about 94 % on day 0 to about 67 % by day 10 .
By day 31 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a positive result .
• For a throat swab , the percentage chance of a positive test declines from about 88 % on day 0 to about 47 % by day 10 .
By day 31 , there is only a 1 % chance of a positive result .
In other words , the longer the time frame between the onset of symptoms and the time a person is tested , the more likely the test will be negative .
Repeat testing of persons who have a negative test may ( eventually @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but this is impractical .
Additionally , repeated testing of the same person can lead to even more confusing results : The test may go from negative , to positive , then back to negative again as the immune system clears out the coronavirus infection and moves to recovery .
And what makes this testing even more confusing is that the FDA admits that : “ The detection of viral RNA by RT-PCR does not necessarily equate with an infectious virus.
” You ’ ve had all the symptoms of COVID19 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ negative .
• Does that mean you ’ re “ good to go ” – you can go to work , go to school or you can travel ?
OR… • Does that mean your influenza-like illness was caused by some other pathogen , possibly one of the four coronaviruses that have been in circulation for 60 years ?
OR… • Does that mean the result is a false-negative and you still have the infection , but it isn ’ t detectable by current tests ?
OR… • Does that mean it was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the faulty technique by the technician ?
OR… • Does that mean you have not been exposed , and you are susceptible to contracting the infection , and you need to stay in quarantine ?
So , what does a “ positive ” test actually mean ?
And that ’ s the problem : No one knows for sure .
According to the nonprofit Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics ( FIND ) , more than 200 serologic blood tests , to test for antibodies , are either now available or in development .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ that are assessed for nearly any type of infection : IgM and IgG .
While several new testing devices are being touted as a home test , they are not the same as a home pregnancy test or a glucometer to you ’ re your blood sugar .
The blood spot or saliva specimen can be collected at home , must it must then be sent to a laboratory for analysis .
It can take a few days – or longer – to get the results .
With so many tests in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ home will be changing over time .
The first antibody to rise is IgM .
It rises quickly after the onset of the infection and is usually a sign of an acute , or current , infection .
The IgM levels diminish quickly as the infection resolves .
The FDA admits they do not know how long the IgM remains present for SARS-CoV-2 as the infection is being cleared .
The interpretation of an IgG antibody is more difficult .
This antibody is an indicator of a past infection .
The test is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the past infection was caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus or one of the four common coronaviruses that cause influenza-like illness .
Because serology testing can yield a negative test result even if the patient is actively infected ( e.g.
, the body has not yet developed in response to the virus ) or maybe falsely positive ( e.g.
, if the antibody indicates a past infection by a different coronavirus ) , this type of testing should not be used to diagnose an acute or active COVID-19 infection .
Similarly , the CDC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ • If you test positive : • A positive test result shows you have antibodies as a result of an infection with SARS-CoV-2 , or possibly a related coronavirus .
• It ’ s unclear if those antibodies can provide protection ( immunity ) against getting infected again .
This means that we do not know at this time if antibodies make you immune to the virus .
• If you have no symptoms , you likely do not have an active infection and no additional follow-up is needed .
• It ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ antibodies and you might not have or have ever had symptoms of COVID-19 .
This is known as having an asymptomatic infection [ ie you have a healthy immune system ! ]
• An antibody test can not tell if you are currently sick with COVID-19 .
• If you test negative • If you test negative for antibodies , you probably did not have a previous infection.However , you could have a current infection because antibodies don ’ t show up for 1 to 3 weeks after infection .
• Some people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and some people may not develop antibodies .
• An antibody test can not tell if you are currently sick with COVID-19 .
• Isn ’ t this the marker of immunity they assess after you ’ ve had an infection with measles or chickenpox or mumps to determine if you are immune to future infections ?
• Isn ’ t this the marker of induced immunity they are trying to achieve by administering a vaccine ?
If the FDA does not know if an IgG antibody to SARS-CoV-2 after recovering from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ infection , then they certainly don ’ t know if an antibody caused by a vaccine will prevent infection either .
Doesn ’ t this completely eliminate the theory that antibodies afford protection and antibodies from vaccines are necessary to keep you from getting sick ?
Illinois U.S. Rep. Bobby L. Rush introduced the H.R .
6666 TRACE Act on May 1 .
On his website , Rush said , Until we have a vaccine to defeat this dreaded disease , contact tracing in order to understand the full breadth and depth of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only way we will be able to get out from under this .
H.R.6666 would authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services ( HHS ) , acting through the Director of the CDC to award grants to eligible entities to conduct diagnostic testing and then to trace and monitor the contacts of infected individuals .
The contact tracers would be authorized to test people in their homes and as necessary , quarantine people in place .
Where do they intend to do this testing ?
Besides mobile units to test people in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ specific locations where the testing and contract tracing could occur : schools , health clinics , universities , churches , and “ any other type of entity ” the secretary of HHS wants to use .
The bill would allocate $ 100 billion in 2020 “ and such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2021 and any subsequent fiscal year during which the emergency period continues.
” But what are they looking for ?
• Is your test supposed to be positive – saying you ’ ve been exposed and you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is your test supposed to be negative , meaning , you are healthy ?
• Or does a completely negative test – negative RT-PCR test and no IgG antibody mean you ’ re susceptible to infection and you need to stay in quarantine ?
The virus is rapidly mutating , which is rather typical of RNA viruses .
In a study published in April 2020 , researchers have discovered that the novel coronavirus has mutated into at least 30 different genetic variations .
If your RT-PCR test is positive , does this identify @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to one of the genetic variations ?
The same can be said about the vaccines under development : With each mutation , is the vaccine more likely to be all risk and no benefit when it reaches the market ?
What You Can Do Across the nation , police are being told to not apprehend criminals but instead , to arrest parents at playgrounds , to arrest lone surfers on public beaches , to fine ministers and congregation members sitting in their cars listening to a service on the radio , and to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ People have had enough .
They are beginning to see the huge scam that has been perpetrated on the entire world over a viral infection with a global death rate of 1.4 % ( meaning , 1.4 % of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 have a fatal outcome , while 98.6 % recover ) .
This is far fewer deaths than a severe flu season .
We ’ re already starting to see the thrust to take our power back : • In Virginia , people went to the beaches en mass , ignoring @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Governor to stay home .
• The central California city of Atwater has declared itself a “ sanctuary city , ” allowing business owners and churches to open , openly defying Democratic California Gov .
Gavin Newsom ’ s coronavirus-related stay-at-home order .
• The truth about wearing masks is starting to come out and people are voting with their feet .
Retired neurosurgeon , Dr. Russell Blaylock , warns that not only do face masks fail to protect healthy people from contracting an illness , but they create serious health risks to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ down and held us hostage in our homes , they changed our society , our lives , our world .
• I am not willing to accept this is the “ new normal.
” • I will not be afraid of standing next to a friend or family member and will not obey the concept of “ social distancing.
” • I will understand that an asymptomatic carrier is a normal , healthy person and I will not buy into the fear that I might “ catch something ” from a normal , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for Americans to resist with non-violent civil disobedience .
Be brave .
Be bold .
Put on the full armor of God , as found in Ephesians 6:10-20 in the Bible , to stand against the world rulers of this present darkness .
With God on our side , all things are possible .

by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, DO, AOBNMM, ABIHM
In 1965, scientists identified the first human coronavirus; it was associated with the common cold. The Coronavirus family, named for their crown-like appearance, currently includes 36 viruses.
Within that group, there are 4 common viruses that have been causing infection in humans for more than sixty years. In addition, three pandemic coronaviruses that can infect humans: SARS, MERS, and now, SARS-CoV-2.
As the news of deaths in China, South Korea, Italy, and Iran began to saturate every form of media 24/7, we became familiar with a new term: COVID-19.
To be clear, the name of the newly identified coronavirus is SARS-CoV-2, short for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2. This virus is associated with fever, cough, chest pain, and shortness of breath, the complex of symptoms that form the diagnosis of COVID-19.
The Trump administration declared a public health emergency on January 31, 2020, then on February 2 placed a ban on the entry of most travelers who had recently been in China.
On February 4, Alex Azar, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a declaration of public health emergency and activated the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, otherwise known as the PREP Act.
This nefarious legislation provides complete protection of manufacturers from liability for all products, technologies, biologics, or any jjab developed as a medical countermeasure against COVID-19. For those nervously waiting for the jjab to become available, be sure to understand the PREP Act before rushing to the get in line.
Calls for testing – to see if a person is or isn’t infected – began soon after the emergency was declared, but performing those tests was initially slow due to an inadequate number of test kits. As the kits became available, those developed by the CDC had a defect: The reagents reacted to the negative control sample, making the test inaccurate and the kits unusable.
In various countries, thousands of test kits purchased from China were found to be contaminated with the SARS-CoV-2 viruses. No one really knows how that happened, but theories spread like wildfire.
Could the test kit infect the person being tested? Or, did it mean the test would return a false-positive result, driving up the numbers of those said to be infected so those in power could implement stronger lockdowns and accelerate the hockey-stick unemployment rates? Neither of those questions has been adequately answered.
Mandatory Testing… of what?
Authorities claim that testing is important for public health officials to assess if their mitigation efforts – “shelter in place” and “social distancing” and “wearing a mask” – are making a difference to “flatten the curve.” Officials also claim that testing is necessary to know how many persons are infected within a community and to understand the nature of how coronaviruses spread.
Are these reasons sufficient to give up our health freedom and our personal rights, being tested and shamed in public?
Despite the challenges with test kits, testing began. By the end of March 2020, more than 1 million people had been tested across the US. By May 9, the number tested had grown to over 8.7M. Testing methods include a swab of the nasal passages or by inserting a long, uncomfortable swab through the nose to scrape the back of the throat. Specimens have also been obtained bronchoalveolar lavage, from sputum, and from stool specimens.
The call for mandatory testing has been gathering steam and becoming ever more onerous. In Washington state, Governor Inslee has declared:
Individuals that refuse to cooperate with contact tracers and/or refuse testing, those individuals will not be allowed to leave their homes to purchase basic necessities such as groceries and/or prescriptions. Those persons will need to make arrangements through friends, family, or state provided ‘family support’ personnel.
But what do the results really mean?
Who Should Be Tested
On May 8, 2020, the CDC has listed specific priorities for when testing should be done. As of May 16,more than 11-million samples have been collected and more than 3700 specimens have not yet been evaluated.
High Priority
Hospitalized patients with symptoms
Healthcare facility workers, workers in living settings, and first responders with symptoms
Residents in long-term care facilities or other congregate living settings, including prisons and shelters, with symptoms
Priority
Persons with symptoms of potential COVID-19 infection, including fever, cough, shortness of breath, chills, muscle pain, new loss of taste or smell, vomiting or diarrhea, and/or sore throat
of potential COVID-19 infection, including fever, cough, shortness of breath, chills, muscle pain, new loss of taste or smell, vomiting or diarrhea, and/or sore throat Persons without symptoms who are prioritized by health departments or clinicians, for any reason, including but not limited to public health monitoring, sentinel surveillance, or screening of asymptomatic individuals according to state and local plans.
Read that last priority again: That means virtually everyone can be required to get a test.
Is that a violation of your personal rights? And, if you submit to testing, what does a “positive test” actually mean?
Types of Testing: RT-PCR
PCR, short for polymerase chain reaction, is a highly specific laboratory technique. The key to understanding PCR testing is that PCR can identify an individual specific virus within a viral family.
However, a PCR test can only be used to identify DNA viruses; the SARS-CoV2 virus is an RNA virus. Therefore, multiple steps must be taken to “magnify” the amount of genetic material in the specimen. Researchers used a method called RT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, to specifically identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It’s a complicated process. To read more about it, go here and here.
If a nasal or a blood sample contains a tiny snip of RNA from the SARS-CoV-2 virus, RT-PCR can identify it, leading to a high probability that the person has been exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
However – and this is important – a positive RT-PCR test result does not necessarily indicate a full virus is present. The virus must be fully intact to be transmitted and cause illness.
RT-PCR Testing: The Importance of Timing
Even if a person has had all the symptoms associated with a coronavirus infection or has been closely exposed to persons who have been diagnosed with COVID-19, the probability of a RT-PCR test being positive decreases with the number of days past the onset of symptoms.
According to a study done by Paul Wikramaratna and others:
For a nasal swab, the percentage chance of a positive test declines from about 94% on day 0 to about 67% by day 10. By day 31, there is only a 2% chance of a positive result.
the percentage chance of a positive test declines from about 94% on day 0 to about 67% by day 10. By day 31, there is only a of a positive result. For a throat swab, the percentage chance of a positive test declines from about 88% on day 0 to about 47% by day 10. By day 31, there is only a 1% chance of a positive result.
In other words, the longer the time frame between the onset of symptoms and the time a person is tested, the more likely the test will be negative.
Repeat testing of persons who have a negative test may (eventually) confirm the presence of viral RNA, but this is impractical.
Additionally, repeated testing of the same person can lead to even more confusing results: The test may go from negative, to positive, then back to negative again as the immune system clears out the coronavirus infection and moves to recovery.
And what makes this testing even more confusing is that the FDA admits that:
“The detection of viral RNA by RT-PCR does not necessarily equate with an infectious virus.”
Let’s break that down:
You’ve had all the symptoms of COVID19, but your RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 is negative.
Does that mean you’re “good to go” – you can go to work, go to school or you can travel? OR…
Does that mean your influenza-like illness was caused by some other pathogen, possibly one of the four coronaviruses that have been in circulation for 60 years? OR…
Does that mean the result is a false-negative and you still have the infection, but it isn’t detectable by current tests? OR…
Does that mean it was a sample was inadequately taken due to the faulty technique by the technician? OR…
Does that mean you have not been exposed, and you are susceptible to contracting the infection, and you need to stay in quarantine?
So, what does a “positive” test actually mean? And that’s the problem:
No one knows for sure.
Another Type of Testing: Antibodies
According to the nonprofit Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), more than 200 serologic blood tests, to test for antibodies, are either now available or in development.
There are two primary types of antibodies that are assessed for nearly any type of infection: IgM and IgG. While several new testing devices are being touted as a home test, they are not the same as a home pregnancy test or a glucometer to you’re your blood sugar.
The blood spot or saliva specimen can be collected at home, must it must then be sent to a laboratory for analysis. It can take a few days – or longer – to get the results. With so many tests in the pipeline, the ability to test at home will be changing over time.
The first antibody to rise is IgM. It rises quickly after the onset of the infection and is usually a sign of an acute, or current, infection. The IgM levels diminish quickly as the infection resolves. The FDA admits they do not know how long the IgM remains present for SARS-CoV-2 as the infection is being cleared.
The interpretation of an IgG antibody is more difficult. This antibody is an indicator of a past infection. The test is often not specific enough to determine if the past infection was caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus or one of the four common coronaviruses that cause influenza-like illness.
The FDA says:
Because serology testing can yield a negative test result even if the patient is actively infected (e.g., the body has not yet developed in response to the virus) or maybe falsely positive (e.g., if the antibody indicates a past infection by a different coronavirus), this type of testing should not be used to diagnose an acute or active COVID-19 infection.
Similarly, the CDC says the following regarding antibody testing:
If you test positive: A positive test result shows you have antibodies as a result of an infection with SARS-CoV-2, or possibly a related coronavirus. It’s unclear if those antibodies can provide protection (immunity) against getting infected again. This means that we do not know at this time if antibodies make you immune to the virus. If you have no symptoms, you likely do not have an active infection and no additional follow-up is needed. It’s possible you might test positive for antibodies and you might not have or have ever had symptoms of COVID-19. This is known as having an asymptomatic infection [ie you have a healthy immune system!] An antibody test cannot tell if you are currently sick with COVID-19.
If you test negative If you test negative for antibodies, you probably did not have a previous infection. However, you could have a current infection because antibodies don’t show up for 1 to 3 weeks after infection. Some people may take even longer to develop antibodies, and some people may not develop antibodies. An antibody test cannot tell if you are currently sick with COVID-19.
What? Wait!
Doesn’t the jjab industry call the IgG a “protective antibody”?
Isn’t this the marker of immunity they assess after you’ve had an infection with measles or chickenpox or mumps to determine if you are immune to future infections?
Isn’t this the marker of induced immunity they are trying to achieve by administering a jjab?
If the FDA does not know if an IgG antibody to SARS-CoV-2 after recovering from the infection is protective against a future infection, then they certainly don’t know if an antibody caused by a jjab will prevent infection either.
Doesn’t this completely eliminate the theory that antibodies afford protection and antibodies from jjabs are necessary to keep you from getting sick?
Mandatory Testing – New Job Creation
Illinois U.S. Rep. Bobby L. Rush introduced the H.R. 6666 TRACE Act on May 1. On his website, Rush said,
Until we have a jjab to defeat this dreaded disease, contact tracing in order to understand the full breadth and depth of the spread of this virus is the only way we will be able to get out from under this.
H.R.6666 would authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), acting through the Director of the CDC to award grants to eligible entities to conduct diagnostic testing and then to trace and monitor the contacts of infected individuals. The contact tracers would be authorized to test people in their homes and as necessary, quarantine people in place.
Where do they intend to do this testing? Besides mobile units to test people in their homes, the bill identifies eight specific locations where the testing and contract tracing could occur: schools, health clinics, universities, churches, and “any other type of entity” the secretary of HHS wants to use.
The bill would allocate $100 billion in 2020 “and such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2021 and any subsequent fiscal year during which the emergency period continues.”
But what are they looking for?
Is your test supposed to be positive – saying you’ve been exposed and you’ve possibly recovered?
– saying you’ve been exposed and you’ve possibly recovered? Or is your test supposed to be negative , meaning, you are healthy?
, meaning, you are healthy? Or does a completely negative test – negative RT-PCR test and no IgG antibody mean you’re susceptible to infection and you need to stay in quarantine?
The virus is rapidly mutating, which is rather typical of RNA viruses. In a study published in April 2020, researchers have discovered that the novel coronavirus has mutated into at least 30 different genetic variations.
If your RT-PCR test is positive, does this identify exposure to the pandemic virus or exposure to one of the genetic variations? The same can be said about the jjabs under development: With each mutation, is the jjab more likely to be all risk and no benefit when it reaches the market?
What You Can Do
Across the nation, police are being told to not apprehend criminals but instead, to arrest parents at playgrounds, to arrest lone surfers on public beaches, to fine ministers and congregation members sitting in their cars listening to a service on the radio, and to restrict movement by creating one-way sidewalks.
People have had enough. They are beginning to see the huge scam that has been perpetrated on the entire world over a viral infection with a global death rate of 1.4% (meaning, 1.4% of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 have a fatal outcome, while 98.6% recover). This is far fewer deaths than a severe flu season.
We’re already starting to see the thrust to take our power back:
In Virginia, people went to the beaches en mass, ignoring social distancing and the orders of the Governor to stay home.
and the orders of the Governor to stay home. The central California city of Atwater has declared itself a “sanctuary city,” allowing business owners and churches to open, openly defying Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s coronavirus-related stay-at-home order.
Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s coronavirus-related stay-at-home order. The truth about wearing masks is starting to come out and people are voting with their feet. Retired neurosurgeon, Dr. Russell Blaylock, warns that not only do face masks fail to protect healthy people from contracting an illness, but they create serious health risks to the wearer.
While they shut us down and held us hostage in our homes, they changed our society, our lives, our world.
I am not willing to accept this is the “new normal.”
I won’t submit to testing.
I will refuse mandatory vaccination.
I will stop wearing a mask.
I will not be afraid of standing next to a friend or family member and will not obey the concept of “social distancing.”
I will understand that an asymptomatic carrier is a normal, healthy person and I will not buy into the fear that I might “catch something” from a normal, healthy person.
It’s time for Americans to resist with non-violent civil disobedience. Be brave. Be bold. Put on the full armor of God, as found in Ephesians 6:10-20 in the Bible, to stand against the world rulers of this present darkness. With God on our side, all things are possible.


humansarefree--2020-05-22--George Soros Views The COVID-19 Plandemic As A ‘Revolutionary Moment’ Where ‘Everything Is Up For Gr

George Soros Views The COVID-19 Plandemic As A ‘Revolutionary Moment’ Where ‘Everything Is Up For Grabs’ Says Radical Change Needed

George Soros referred to the coronavirus ordeal as “ the crisis of my lifetime ” and gave his radical views for change and progress in the wake of the pandemic .
“ Even before the pandemic hit , I realized that we were in a revolutionary moment where what would be impossible or even inconceivable in normal times had become not only possible but probably absolutely necessary.
” He added , “ And then came COVID-19 , which has totally disrupted people ’ s lives and required very different behavior .
It is an unprecedented event that probably has never @ @ @ @ @ @ @ really endangers the survival of our civilization.
” Earlier this month , infamous left-wing billionaire George Soros discussed how the coronavirus will shape the world in an interview with Project Syndicate ’ s Gregor Peter Schmitz .
George Soros is giddy and excited these days , why ?
Because he sees the COVID-19 “ plandemic ” doing amazing things to destroy the economy , to destroy capitalism , and the weaken the United States to the breaking point so his army of low-information Liberal minions can swoop in and remake it .
You @ @ @ @ @ @ @ You will always hear Liberals saying things like ‘ transforming America ’ , ‘ changing America ’ , but you will never hear them talking about America ’ s greatness because they don ’ t believe it is .
Soros has been quiet in 2020 , but his bank accounts have not , he continues to provide over 1 billion dollars per year to support radical and anarchist Leftist groups and causes .
Black Lives Matter ?
That ’ s Soros .
ANTIFA ?
Yep , Soros .
All those races riots from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that ’ s Soros too .
George Soros even funded Antichrist-in-training Emmanuel Macron when he ran for president in 2017 .
Did you know ?
America Is Under Attack By 187 Groups Funded By George Soros You can look for him to provide all the millions necessary for the Democrats to have their ‘ mail-in ballot ’ election in November , and even if people go to the polls , they are voting with a Soros-financed machine .
These are happy , happy days for Globalist Schwartz György , not since he sided @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rob his fellow Jewish neighbors and help send them to concentration camps has he been this happy .
Watch the video below , and listen as George Soros tells how that time in his life were some of his happiest moments .
Until , that is , the COVID-19 Plannedemic .
George Soros Describes COVID-19 Pandemic As ‘ Revolutionary Moment ’ In Which ‘ Everything Is Up For Grabs ’ FROM ACTIVIST MOMMY : In the May 11th interview , Soros referred to the coronavirus ordeal as “ the crisis of my lifetime @ @ @ @ @ @ @ change and progress in the wake of the pandemic .
“ Even before the pandemic hit , I realized that we were in a revolutionary moment where what would be impossible or even inconceivable in normal times had become not only possible but probably absolutely necessary , ” he said during the interview , adding , “ And then came COVID-19 , which has totally disrupted people ’ s lives and required very different behavior .
It is an unprecedented event that probably has never occurred in this combination .
And it really @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He went on to say , “ We will not go back to where we were when the pandemic started .
That is pretty certain .
But that is the only thing that is certain .
Everything else is up for grabs .
I do not think anybody knows how capitalism will evolve.
” Soros also discussed the “ threats ” now facing the European Union .
Soros is a well-known supporter of the globalist organization .
He asserted that “ Europe is facing several existential dangers ” and that he is “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ EU because it is an incomplete union.
” According to the Hungarian-born billionaire , the European Union was “ in the process of being created , ” but that process “ was never completed.
” Soros contended that the EU is “ exceptionally vulnerable – more vulnerable than the US not just because it is an incomplete union but also because it is based on the rule of law.
” During the interview , the progressive philanthropist also discussed a recent conflict between Germany and the EU that involved a ruling from Germany @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that one of the EU ’ s Court of Justice decisions regarding policies of the European Central Bank ( ECB ) was not legally binding .
This resulted in the European Court of Justice asserting that it alone had jurisdiction over the ECB .
Also read : Gates , Zuckerberg , Soros , Bezos Are Destroying The U.S. Republic ( In Preparation For The New World Order ) George Soros , a globalist , sided with the EU during the interview .
“ When Germany joined the EU , it committed itself to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ argued .
He expressed fears that this ruling “ poses a threat that could destroy the European Union as an institution based on the rule of law ” as it could lead to other countries like Poland or Hungary to try to become more independent of the EU since “ the German court can question the decisions of the European Court of Justice.
” Soros asked , “ Can Hungary and Poland decide whether they follow European law or their own courts – whose legitimacy the EU has questioned ?
That question goes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which is built on the rule of law .
Poland has immediately risen to the occasion and asserted the supremacy of its government-controlled courts over European law .
In Hungary , Viktor Orbán has already used the COVID-19 emergency and a captured parliament to appoint himself dictator , ” Soros claimed .
Soros claims that Orbán has positioned himself as a dictator but a new poll shows that the majority of Hungarians ( 54 percent ) approve of the Orbán administration ’ s measures and would vote for him in the coming @ @ @ @ @ @ @ isn ’ t the only world leader Soros labeled as a dictator .
In the interview he briefly talked about President Donald Trump , accusing him of wanting “ to be a dictator ” but going on to say that “ he can not be one because there is a constitution in the United States that people still respect.
” George Soros remained vague in discussing the “ things ” President Trump allegedly wants to do but said the constitution “ will prevent him from doing certain things ” but that it isn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because he is literally fighting for his life.
” He went on to add , “ I will also say that I have put my faith in Trump to destroy himself , and he has exceeded my wildest expectations.
” It ’ s safe to assume that Soros has labeled Trump as an aspiring dictator simply because POTUS presents opposition for the progressive , globalist agenda that Soros heavily finances and actively advocates for .
He has $ 5.1 million alone invested in a super PAC that is dedicated to funding groups working @ @ @ @ @ @ @ George Soros also notoriously finances left-wing causes throughout the United States and around the world to the tune of $ 1 billion each year including abortion , euthanasia , population control , transgenderism , and same-sex “ marriage.
” If there ever was an arch-nemesis for conservatives , Soros would most definitely be it .
( Read more )

George Soros referred to the coronavirus ordeal as “the crisis of my lifetime” and gave his radical views for change and progress in the wake of the pandemic.
“Even before the pandemic hit, I realized that we were in a revolutionary moment where what would be impossible or even inconceivable in normal times had become not only possible but probably absolutely necessary.”
He added, “And then came COVID-19, which has totally disrupted people’s lives and required very different behavior. It is an unprecedented event that probably has never occurred in this combination. And it really endangers the survival of our civilization.”
Earlier this month, infamous left-wing billionaire George Soros discussed how the coronavirus will shape the world in an interview with Project Syndicate’s Gregor Peter Schmitz.
George Soros is giddy and excited these days, why? Because he sees the COVID-19 “plandemic” doing amazing things to destroy the economy, to destroy capitalism, and the weaken the United States to the breaking point so his army of low-information Liberal minions can swoop in and remake it.
You can watch the PLANDEMIC documentary below:
You will always hear Liberals saying things like ‘transforming America’, ‘changing America’, but you will never hear them talking about America’s greatness because they don’t believe it is.
Soros has been quiet in 2020, but his bank accounts have not, he continues to provide over 1 billion dollars per year to support radical and anarchist Leftist groups and causes.
Black Lives Matter? That’s Soros. ANTIFA? Yep, Soros. All those races riots from a few years back? Yep, that’s Soros too.
George Soros even funded Antichrist-in-training Emmanuel Macron when he ran for president in 2017.
Did you know? America Is Under Attack By 187 Groups Funded By George Soros
You can look for him to provide all the millions necessary for the Democrats to have their ‘mail-in ballot’ election in November, and even if people go to the polls, they are voting with a Soros-financed machine.
These are happy, happy days for Globalist Schwartz György, not since he sided with the Nazis as a teenager to rob his fellow Jewish neighbors and help send them to concentration camps has he been this happy.
Watch the video below, and listen as George Soros tells how that time in his life were some of his happiest moments. Until, that is, the COVID-19 Plannedemic.
George Soros Describes COVID-19 Pandemic As ‘Revolutionary Moment’ In Which ‘Everything Is Up For Grabs’
FROM ACTIVIST MOMMY: In the May 11th interview, Soros referred to the coronavirus ordeal as “the crisis of my lifetime” and gave his radical views for change and progress in the wake of the pandemic.
“Even before the pandemic hit, I realized that we were in a revolutionary moment where what would be impossible or even inconceivable in normal times had become not only possible but probably absolutely necessary,” he said during the interview, adding,
“And then came COVID-19, which has totally disrupted people’s lives and required very different behavior. It is an unprecedented event that probably has never occurred in this combination. And it really endangers the survival of our civilization.”
He went on to say,
“We will not go back to where we were when the pandemic started. That is pretty certain. But that is the only thing that is certain. Everything else is up for grabs. I do not think anybody knows how capitalism will evolve.”
Soros also discussed the “threats” now facing the European Union. Soros is a well-known supporter of the globalist organization. He asserted that “Europe is facing several existential dangers” and that he is “particularly concerned about the survival of the EU because it is an incomplete union.”
According to the Hungarian-born billionaire, the European Union was “in the process of being created,” but that process “was never completed.”
Soros contended that the EU is “exceptionally vulnerable – more vulnerable than the US not just because it is an incomplete union but also because it is based on the rule of law.”
During the interview, the progressive philanthropist also discussed a recent conflict between Germany and the EU that involved a ruling from Germany’s highest court on May 5 that one of the EU’s Court of Justice decisions regarding policies of the European Central Bank (ECB) was not legally binding.
This resulted in the European Court of Justice asserting that it alone had jurisdiction over the ECB.
Also read: Gates, Zuckerberg, Soros, Bezos Are Destroying The U.S. Republic (In Preparation For The New World Order)
George Soros, a globalist, sided with the EU during the interview. “When Germany joined the EU, it committed itself to abide by European law,” he argued.
He expressed fears that this ruling “poses a threat that could destroy the European Union as an institution based on the rule of law” as it could lead to other countries like Poland or Hungary to try to become more independent of the EU since “the German court can question the decisions of the European Court of Justice.”
Soros asked, “Can Hungary and Poland decide whether they follow European law or their own courts – whose legitimacy the EU has questioned? That question goes to the very heart of the EU, which is built on the rule of law. Poland has immediately risen to the occasion and asserted the supremacy of its government-controlled courts over European law. In Hungary, Viktor Orbán has already used the COVID-19 emergency and a captured parliament to appoint himself dictator,” Soros claimed.
Soros claims that Orbán has positioned himself as a dictator but a new poll shows that the majority of Hungarians (54 percent) approve of the Orbán administration’s measures and would vote for him in the coming election scheduled for this year. Orbán isn’t the only world leader Soros labeled as a dictator.
In the interview he briefly talked about President Donald Trump, accusing him of wanting “to be a dictator” but going on to say that “he cannot be one because there is a constitution in the United States that people still respect.”
George Soros remained vague in discussing the “things” President Trump allegedly wants to do but said the constitution “will prevent him from doing certain things” but that it isn’t stopping Trump from trying “because he is literally fighting for his life.”
He went on to add,
“I will also say that I have put my faith in Trump to destroy himself, and he has exceeded my wildest expectations.”
It’s safe to assume that Soros has labeled Trump as an aspiring dictator simply because POTUS presents opposition for the progressive, globalist agenda that Soros heavily finances and actively advocates for.
He has $5.1 million alone invested in a super PAC that is dedicated to funding groups working against the re-election of President Trump.
George Soros also notoriously finances left-wing causes throughout the United States and around the world to the tune of $1 billion each year including abortion, euthanasia, population control, transgenderism, and same-sex “marriage.”
If there ever was an arch-nemesis for conservatives, Soros would most definitely be it. (Read more)
Source: Nowtheendbegins.com


humansarefree--2020-05-22--WHO Inadvertently Admits That Vaccines Won’t Work Against Coronavirus

In trying to keep the pandemic going for as long as possible , it would seem , the World Health Organization ( WHO ) is insistent that developing natural immunity to the Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) may not be possible , and that society ’ s only hope is a vaccine .
But if natural immunity is out of the question , then why would vaccine-induced immunity be any better ?
With roughly 310,000 confirmed deaths worldwide , the Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) pandemic continues to dominate news headlines , especially now that the Trump administration is getting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a fast-tracked vaccine .
But nobody seems to be addressing the fact that if our own natural immune systems can not fight the thing , then there is no way a vaccine will do anything other than needlessly cause adverse effects .
In a recent announcement , the WHO stated that there is no solid proof to suggest that people who test positive for the Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) and recover develop natural immunity .
They could still get re-infected again , the United Nations ( UN ) body insists – even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that a strain-specific vaccine would theoretically provide even less protection than natural immunity , if this is the case .
“ There is currently no evidence that people who have recovered from # COVID19 and have antibodies are protected from a second infection , ” the WHO wrote in a statement .
It ’ s about making you obedient , not safe The reason why the WHO is making a point of emphasizing the questionable immunity that comes following a Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) infection is that the globalist entity does not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ guidelines ” like mask-wearing and physical distancing .
“ People who assume that they are immune to a second infection because they have received a positive test result may ignore public health advice , ” the WHO laments .
Should a vaccine ever become available , UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres wants it to be distributed for “ free ” to everyone – meaning taxpayers will collectively foot the bill through their governments .
This is great news for billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates , whose own vaccine development endeavors are almost guaranteed to reap @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) vaccines eventually become a thing .
The way that Gates , the WHO , and other pandemic extremists plan to keep the public strung along in anticipation of a magical “ unicorn ” vaccine is to continue fear-mongering about the threat of infection .
One of the latest claims is that the Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) will never go away , which is sure to scare enough people into demanding whatever “ warp speed ” drug , injectable or otherwise , is presented as the cure .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the table : This virus may become just another endemic virus in our communities , and this virus may never go away , ” stated Dr. Mike Ryan , the “ emergencies director ” of the WHO , during a recent virtual press conference .
Ryan then went on to compare the Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) to HIV , stating that “ HIV has not gone away , but we have come to terms with the virus , ” adding that he does not believe that “ anyone can predict when this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are some 100 potential vaccine candidates for the Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) currently in development .
But this means nothing in terms of the continued spread of the disease , assuming any of these vaccines even work , because there are already vaccines for other health conditions like the measles that have not been eradicated .

In trying to keep the pandemic going for as long as possible, it would seem, the World Health Organization (WHO) is insistent that developing natural immunity to the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) may not be possible, and that society’s only hope is a jjab.
But if natural immunity is out of the question, then why would jjab-induced immunity be any better?
With roughly 310,000 confirmed deaths worldwide, the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic continues to dominate news headlines, especially now that the Trump administration is getting the ball rolling on developing and releasing a fast-tracked jjab.
But nobody seems to be addressing the fact that if our own natural immune systems cannot fight the thing, then there is no way a jjab will do anything other than needlessly cause adverse effects.
In a recent announcement, the WHO stated that there is no solid proof to suggest that people who test positive for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) and recover develop natural immunity.
They could still get re-infected again, the United Nations (UN) body insists – even as it continues to ignore the fact that a strain-specific jjab would theoretically provide even less protection than natural immunity, if this is the case.
“There is currently no evidence that people who have recovered from #COVID19 and have antibodies are protected from a second infection,” the WHO wrote in a statement.
It’s about making you obedient, not safe
The reason why the WHO is making a point of emphasizing the questionable immunity that comes following a Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) infection is that the globalist entity does not want people refusing to following “safety guidelines” like mask-wearing and physical distancing.
“People who assume that they are immune to a second infection because they have received a positive test result may ignore public health advice,” the WHO laments.
Should a jjab ever become available, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres wants it to be distributed for “free” to everyone – meaning taxpayers will collectively foot the bill through their governments.
This is great news for billionaire eugenicist Billy Boy, whose own jjab development endeavors are almost guaranteed to reap windfall profits if “free” Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) jjabs eventually become a thing.
The way that Gates, the WHO, and other pandemic extremists plan to keep the public strung along in anticipation of a magical “unicorn” jjab is to continue fear-mongering about the threat of infection.
One of the latest claims is that the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) will never go away, which is sure to scare enough people into demanding whatever “warp speed” drug, injectable or otherwise, is presented as the cure.
“It is important to put this on the table: This virus may become just another endemic virus in our communities, and this virus may never go away,” stated Dr. Mike Ryan, the “emergencies director” of the WHO, during a recent virtual press conference.
Ryan then went on to compare the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) to HIV, stating that “HIV has not gone away, but we have come to terms with the virus,” adding that he does not believe that “anyone can predict when this disease will disappear.”
Unbelievably, there are some 100 potential jjab candidates for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) currently in development.
But this means nothing in terms of the continued spread of the disease, assuming any of these jjabs even work, because there are already jjabs for other health conditions like the measles that have not been eradicated.
By Ethan Huff, Guest writer


humansarefree--2020-05-22--10 Steps to Turn a Pandemic into the Brave New Normal

Now , dear reader , I know you ’ re not a member of an institutionally sociopathic elite caste , trying to extend your power back to the good old days of supreme monarchs ordained by God himself .
But imagine you were .
Imagine you were one of the richest people to ever exist , and your vast network of wealth and influence was based on some imaginary money and the widely cultivated belief that “ there is no alternative ” .
Now imagine the lies which secure your position are suddenly and violently challenged .
Imagine Yellow Vested @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an independence referendum in Catalonia .
Anti-globalists , on the left and right , surging in popularity all around the world .
Imagine Brexit and Bitcoin and PirateBay and the myriad tiny ways people won ’ t do what they ’ re told .
What you ’ re suffering from is a loss of control of the narrative .
What you need , really , is a new story .
Something to instil everyone with a sense of common purpose .
To frighten them , and distract them and keep them busy .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ will make everyone “ come together ” .
To put aside “ divisions ” and “ hate ” and all work together to face a “ common enemy ” .
And enemies , like cakes and lemonade , are always far more satisfying when you make them yourself .
Here are the 10 steps you should employ , if you want to turn an unthreatening virus into a global power grab .
• Start with a poorly defined virus , add an inaccurate test for it , and encourage as many terminally or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ repeat tested until they test positive .
• Report your inevitably very high death rates and get vague about whether these people died OF the virus or simply WITH it .
• Create a ‘ response ’ to the ‘ crisis ’ that rolls out a vast network of authoritarian measures , some of which have been in planning for a long while , and only a minority of which have any possible application to pandemic-prevention .
( Make sure to cancel elections until further notice and to hugely increase police powers of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your hospitals to all but ‘ covid cases ’ .
Cancel elective surgeries , kidney dialysis , cancer treatments , normal GP consultations and all “ non-emergency healthcare ” .
Thus inevitably increasing all-cause mortality .
• Change your laws in numerous ways to allow almost all of these new deaths to bypass normal checks and balances and be easily diagnosed as ‘ covid-19 related ’ , either with the inaccurate test or simply by ‘ clinical presentation ’ .
• In case some attending medics are reluctant to go along with this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ single MD , who may never even have seen the patient in question , to diagnose covid19 at his/her own discretion .
• Report the startling numbers of ‘ new cases ’ you find as a result of these various manipulations , as evidence for how essential the new authoritarian measures are for ‘ saving lives ’ .
• With no sense of irony introduce mandatory Do Not Resuscitate ( DNR ) s for any demographic you consider useless eaters .
( If challenged talk about human suffering , limited healthcare resources and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to add any ensuing deaths to the covid19 totals .
( source ) • Make sure the media calls anyone who questions any part of this a ‘ conspiracy theorist ’ .
Not only will these ten steps allow you to create a quasi-fascist police state , but the chattering classes will actually criticise you for not being enough of a police state and beg for more .
No doubt some will say this is excessively cynical , maybe even ‘ conspiratorial ’ .
But is it ?
Since February 2020 we have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ factual reality of the entity called the “ covid19 pandemic ” .
We have done this using official statistics and data , and the ignored testimony of experts in the field .
What has the orthodox story brought , in the same time frame ?
The claim for this being a unique pathology requiring unique levels of intervention is being made every day , in virtually every mainstream outlets , many alt news outlets and by virtually every major government and health-related NGO .
It ’ s a deafening cacophony , a 24/7 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fog of headlines and speculation and ‘ what ifs ’ and ‘ some experts claim ’ and forests of unsourced or unexplained numbers .
But what is it based on ?
What data , what statistics , what observations are forming the basis of this narrative ?
Is there anything solid behind the noise ?
Despite the atmosphere of panic being generated , and despite frequent usage of epithets like ‘ deadly virus ’ in the popular press , no one is claiming covid19 kills a lot of people .
In fact quite @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recently .
The very same sources that are promoting the need for unique action over this virus will tell you in the next breath that there is nothing uniquely dangerous about it at all .
According to the UK ’ s chief medical officer , 80 % of those infected will get no symptoms or a mild cold , only a tiny minority will even need treatment in hospital , and even of those , the vast majority will survive .
So , what , in actual real-world terms , is being claimed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that this virus kills a lot of people , what is the problem ?
The only response to that is to talk about health services being overrun due to the ‘ R0 ’ .
As if you can take that number in isolation and have it mean something .
It ’ s nonsense .
A high R0 is not concerning if the virus is harmless to most people who encounter it .
The common cold has an R0 of between 2-3 , pretty much the same as SARSCOV2 .
It also can kill @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
So , if this argument makes sense we should be locked down permanently for fear of catching a sniffle .
The R0 argument used to get additional cred from referring to the Imperial model and its prediction that the health service would be overrun if some kind of lockdown was not enforced .
But this is more than problematic .
The Imperial model has now been widely discredited , and its author , Neil Ferguson , exposed as a serial incompetent , or serial data-fudger for the govt or the Gates Foundation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to support either the claim for uniqueness or the argument for lockdown .
There is nothing to show it does either very well if at all .
Which means the entire ‘ flatten the curve ’ meme is also discredited , by the way .
Far from being overrun , the NHS is virtually shut down , apart from those almost empty covid19 wards .
Yet apparently it ’ s going to take the UK govt 12 months to get elective surgeries back .
Because , you know , reasons .
NOT an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ privatise or otherwise commandeer the NHS .
Seriously though , people .
If you think there is any coherence , rational thought or data behind the global , Gatesian official position – please tell me where it is .

Now, dear reader, I know you’re not a member of an institutionally sociopathic elite caste, trying to extend your power back to the good old days of supreme monarchs ordained by God himself.
But imagine you were.
Imagine you were one of the richest people to ever exist, and your vast network of wealth and influence was based on some imaginary money and the widely cultivated belief that “there is no alternative”.
Now imagine the lies which secure your position are suddenly and violently challenged. Imagine Yellow Vested protests in the streets of Paris, an independence referendum in Catalonia. Anti-globalists, on the left and right, surging in popularity all around the world.
Imagine Brexit and Bitcoin and PirateBay and the myriad tiny ways people won’t do what they’re told.
What you’re suffering from is a loss of control of the narrative. What you need, really, is a new story. Something to instil everyone with a sense of common purpose. To frighten them, and distract them and keep them busy.
You need a threat, something that will make everyone “come together”. To put aside “divisions” and “hate” and all work together to face a “common enemy”.
And enemies, like cakes and lemonade, are always far more satisfying when you make them yourself.
Here are the 10 steps you should employ, if you want to turn an unthreatening virus into a global power grab.
Not only will these ten steps allow you to create a quasi-fascist police state, but the chattering classes will actually criticise you for not being enough of a police state and beg for more.
No doubt some will say this is excessively cynical, maybe even ‘conspiratorial’. But is it?
Since February 2020 we have dedicated this site to bringing you the factual reality of the entity called the “covid19 pandemic”. We have done this using official statistics and data, and the ignored testimony of experts in the field.
What has the orthodox story brought, in the same time frame?
The claim for this being a unique pathology requiring unique levels of intervention is being made every day, in virtually every mainstream outlets, many alt news outlets and by virtually every major government and health-related NGO.
It’s a deafening cacophony, a 24/7 bullhorn of fear and certitude, a fog of headlines and speculation and ‘what ifs’ and ‘some experts claim’ and forests of unsourced or unexplained numbers.
But what is it based on? What data, what statistics, what observations are forming the basis of this narrative?
Is there anything solid behind the noise?
Despite the atmosphere of panic being generated, and despite frequent usage of epithets like ‘deadly virus’ in the popular press, no one is claiming covid19 kills a lot of people.
In fact quite the opposite, as we pointed out recently. The very same sources that are promoting the need for unique action over this virus will tell you in the next breath that there is nothing uniquely dangerous about it at all.
According to the UK’s chief medical officer, 80% of those infected will get no symptoms or a mild cold, only a tiny minority will even need treatment in hospital, and even of those, the vast majority will survive.
So, what, in actual real-world terms, is being claimed? If the problem isn’t that this virus kills a lot of people, what is the problem?
The only response to that is to talk about health services being overrun due to the ‘R0’. As if you can take that number in isolation and have it mean something.
It’s nonsense. A high R0 is not concerning if the virus is harmless to most people who encounter it. The common cold has an R0 of between 2-3, pretty much the same as SARSCOV2. It also can kill vulnerable people, sometimes in large numbers.
So, if this argument makes sense we should be locked down permanently for fear of catching a sniffle.
The R0 argument used to get additional cred from referring to the Imperial model and its prediction that the health service would be overrun if some kind of lockdown was not enforced.
But this is more than problematic. The Imperial model has now been widely discredited, and its author, Neil Ferguson, exposed as a serial incompetent, or serial data-fudger for the govt or the Gates Foundation. It can no longer be used to support either the claim for uniqueness or the argument for lockdown. There is nothing to show it does either very well if at all.
Which means the entire ‘flatten the curve’ meme is also discredited, by the way. Far from being overrun, the NHS is virtually shut down, apart from those almost empty covid19 wards. Yet apparently it’s going to take the UK govt 12 months to get elective surgeries back.
Because, you know, reasons.
Covid19 reasons.
NOT an opportunistic bid to finally shut down and privatise or otherwise commandeer the NHS.
That’s definite.
Seriously though, people. If you think there is any coherence, rational thought or data behind the global, Gatesian official position – please tell me where it is.


humansarefree--2020-05-22--Facebook And Instagram Are Removing Like Counts To Hide The Popularity Of WrongThink Ideas

Facebook and Instagram are both testing the removal of like count totals so that WrongThink ideas aren ’ t viewed as popular .
They claim the move is to prevent users from comparing themselves to others , but in reality they want to hide the fact that WrongThink is becoming more popular .
Like it or not , engagement metrics matter .
They highlight the popularity of ideas and of content .
Removing the ability to see this removes the social influence that social media has .
Twitter is also experimenting with a similar move in reply threats , which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This is all about correcting the record and controlling the narrative online .
If you control the influencers and their ability to influence others , you control the world .
Facebook could soon start hiding the Like counter on News Feed posts to protect users ’ from envy and dissuade them from self-censorship .
Instagram is already testing this in 7 countries including Canada and Brazil , showing a post ’ s audience just a few names of mutual friends who ’ ve Liked it instead of the total number .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ comparing themselves to others and possibly feeling inadequate if their posts don ’ t get as many Likes .
It could also stop users from deleting posts they think aren ’ t getting enough Likes or not sharing in the first place .
Facebook prototypes hiding like counts [ via Jane Manchun Wong ] Reverse engineering master Jane Manchun Wong spotted Facebook prototyping the hidden Like counts in its Android app .
When we asked Facebook , the company confirmed to TechCrunch that it ’ s considering testing removal of Like counts .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ users yet .
Facebook declined to share results from the Instagram Like hiding tests , its exact motives , or any schedule for starting testing .
If it does decide to go ahead with a test , Facebook would likely do so gradually and pull back if it significantly hurts usage or ad revenue .
Still , the prototype might indicate positive results from hiding Like tallies in Instagram , which we first reported in April after it was spotted by Wong there as well .
After beginning testing in Canada later that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , New Zealand , Italy , Ireland , and Japan to the test in July .
There , a post ’ s author can still see the Like total , but everyone else can ’ t .
The expansion of that Instagram test and Facebook potentially trying it in its own app signals that it might have positive or negligible impacts on sharing while aiding mental health , or at least be worth a slight drop in engagement .
Facebook has gradually been relegated to the place for sharing showy life events like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Snapchat take over for day-to-day sharing .
The problem is that people have so many fewer of those big moments , and the large Like counts they attract can make other users self-conscious of their of own lives and content .
That ’ s all problematic for Facebook ’ s ad views .
Facebook wants to avoid scenarios such as “ Look how many Likes they get .
My life is lame in comparison ” or “ why even share if it ’ s not going to get as many Likes as her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ m unpopular ” .
Removing Like counts could put less pressure on users and encourage them to share more freely and frequently , as I wrote in 2017 .
It could also obscure Facebook ’ s own potential decline in popularity as users switch to other apps .
Posts not getting as many Likes as they used to could hasten the exodus .

Facebook and Instagram are both testing the removal of like count totals so that WrongThink ideas aren’t viewed as popular. They claim the move is to prevent users from comparing themselves to others, but in reality they want to hide the fact that WrongThink is becoming more popular.
Like it or not, engagement metrics matter. They highlight the popularity of ideas and of content. Removing the ability to see this removes the social influence that social media has.
Twitter is also experimenting with a similar move in reply threats, which would hide the engagement metrics on content. This is all about correcting the record and controlling the narrative online. If you control the influencers and their ability to influence others, you control the world.
Facebook could soon start hiding the Like counter on News Feed posts to protect users’ from envy and dissuade them from self-censorship. Instagram is already testing this in 7 countries including Canada and Brazil, showing a post’s audience just a few names of mutual friends who’ve Liked it instead of the total number.
The idea is to prevent users from destructively comparing themselves to others and possibly feeling inadequate if their posts don’t get as many Likes. It could also stop users from deleting posts they think aren’t getting enough Likes or not sharing in the first place.
Facebook prototypes hiding like counts [via Jane Manchun Wong]Reverse engineering master Jane Manchun Wong spotted Facebook prototyping the hidden Like counts in its Android app. When we asked Facebook, the company confirmed to TechCrunch that it’s considering testing removal of Like counts.
However it’s not live for users yet. Facebook declined to share results from the Instagram Like hiding tests, its exact motives, or any schedule for starting testing. If it does decide to go ahead with a test, Facebook would likely do so gradually and pull back if it significantly hurts usage or ad revenue.
Still, the prototype might indicate positive results from hiding Like tallies in Instagram, which we first reported in April after it was spotted by Wong there as well. After beginning testing in Canada later that month. Instagram added Brazil, Australia, New Zealand, Italy, Ireland, and Japan to the test in July.
There, a post’s author can still see the Like total, but everyone else can’t. The expansion of that Instagram test and Facebook potentially trying it in its own app signals that it might have positive or negligible impacts on sharing while aiding mental health, or at least be worth a slight drop in engagement.
Facebook has gradually been relegated to the place for sharing showy life events like marriages or new jobs while Instagram and Snapchat take over for day-to-day sharing.
The problem is that people have so many fewer of those big moments, and the large Like counts they attract can make other users self-conscious of their of own lives and content. That’s all problematic for Facebook’s ad views.
Facebook wants to avoid scenarios such as “Look how many Likes they get. My life is lame in comparison” or “why even share if it’s not going to get as many Likes as her post and people will think I’m unpopular”.
Removing Like counts could put less pressure on users and encourage them to share more freely and frequently, as I wrote in 2017. It could also obscure Facebook’s own potential decline in popularity as users switch to other apps. Posts not getting as many Likes as they used to could hasten the exodus.
Source and reference: News.gab.com; TechCrunch.com


humansarefree--2020-05-23--Moderna COVID Vaccine Trial Sees 20% ‘Serious’ Injury Rate

On Monday this week ( May 18 , 2020 ) Moderna put out a press release stating that they had seen positive results to the first phase of their COVID-19 vaccine trial .
The news sent their stock prices surging , as the pharmaceutical company is working with Dr. Anthony Fauci and the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases which Fauci heads .
However , that all changed on Tuesday , May 19 , 2020 , when Stat News published an article stating that Moderna did not produce any data to back their claims .
Heavy hearts soared Monday @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine candidate — the frontrunner in the American market — seemed to be generating an immune response in Phase 1 trial subjects .
The company ’ s stock valuation also surged , hitting $ 29 billion , an astonishing feat for a company that currently sells zero products .
But was there good reason for so much enthusiasm ?
Several vaccine experts asked by STAT concluded that , based on the information made available by the Cambridge , Mass.-based company , there ’ s really no way to know how impressive — or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ While Moderna blitzed the media , it revealed very little information — and most of what it did disclose were words , not data .
Even the figures the company did release don ’ t mean much on their own , because critical information — effectively the key to interpreting them — was withheld .
( Source ) Robert F. Kennedy , Jr. also published his own observation on the little bit of data that was disclosed via his Instagram Account : Moderna ’ s cheery press release this morning , the clinical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could not be much worse .
The vaccine , developed and championed by Anthony Fauci and financed by Bill Gates , used an experimental MRNA technology that the two men hoped would allow rapid deployment to meet President Trump ’ s ambitions “ warp speed ” time line .
Dr Fauci was so confident of his shot ’ s safety that he waved ferret and primate studies ( Moderna suspiciously reported no health data from its mouse studies . )
That appears to have been a mistake .
Three of the 15 human @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( 250 mcg ) suffered a “ serious adverse event ” within 43 days of receiving Moderna ’ s jab .
Moderna did not release its clinical trial study or raw data , but its press release , which was freighted with inconsistencies acknowledged that three volunteers developed Grade 3 systemic events defined by the FDA as “ Preventing daily activity and requiring medical intervention.
” Moderna allowed only exceptionally healthy volunteers to participate in the study .
A vaccine with those reaction rates could cause grave injuries in 1.5 billion humans if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” .
That is the threshold that Gates has established for ending the global lockdown .
Moderna did not explain why it reported positive antibody tests for only eight participants .
It ’ s Time To Launch An Investigation Into The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation For Possible ‘ Crimes Against Humanity ’ These outcomes are particularly disappointing because the most hazardous hurdle for the inoculation is still ahead ; challenging participants with wild COVID infection .
Past attempts at developing COVID vaccines have always faltered at this stage as both humans and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and died when exposed to the wild virus .
I have forwarded that claim to my colleagues in securities law ; FTC rules restrict the amount of lipstick public companies may slather on bad donkeys .
The U.S. Government has invested about half a million dollars in the Moderna experimental COVID vaccine so far .
Now today , Thursday May 21st , while record numbers of Americans in the millions and climbing are without jobs , UK drug company AstraZeneca has announced that it has received $ 1.2 BILLION from the U.S. Government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this fall of a COVID-19 vaccine that is still in development and not even approved yet .

“The Science,” we have been told since March 2020, is the rigorous set of guidelines that must be “followed” with unquestioning obedience in order to reduce the spread, flatten the curve, return to normal, get our freedom back, end the lockdowns, or any other arbitrary carrot placed on the stick (yes they literally said this) that is wielded by the tyrant class.
If you don’t follow said “The Science” you are a science denying buffoon who wants grandma to die, doesn’t care about the children, are an alt-right Trump humper, a white supremacist, extremist, and most likely a domestic terrorist.
“Don’t wear a mask!” “Wear a mask!” “Wear two masks!” Wear three masks!” “Cloth masks don’t work!” “Only N95s will protect you!”
“If you’re vaccinated you can’t get covid.” “Vaccines are 100% effective at stopping covid.” “Vaccines are 96% effective.”
“Vaccines are 70% effective.” “Vaccines no longer effective after six months.” “Boosters are our only way out of covid.” “It is a pandemic of the unvaccinated.” “You now need a fourth booster!”
“The Science,” as our readers know has been a shifting goal post since day one and has had almost nothing to do with actual science at all. When the pro-mandate psychopaths changed an arbitrary dictate, we are told that the virus has changed, not “The Science.”
One thing about science and data, however, is that it is very difficult to hide the truth because unlike politicians and corrupt “experts,” the numbers do not lie. Recent findings, according to research published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, show that more people under the age of 65 died from alcohol-related causes than of covid.
All thanks to “The Science(TM).”
Approximately 74,408 Americans ages 16 to 64 died of alcohol-related causes, compared to 74,075 individuals under 65 who died of COVID, according to the data. What’s more, the second number continues to decrease as the CDC and others actually examine “with and from covid” deaths and adjust the final count.
As the NY Times reports, during the pandemic, binge drinking increased, as did emergency room visits for alcohol withdrawal. But the new report found that the number of alcohol-related deaths, including from liver disease and accidents, soared, rising to 99,017 in 2020, up from 78,927 the previous year — an increase of 25 percent in the number of deaths in one year.
“The assumption is that there were lots of people who were in recovery and had reduced access to support that spring and relapsed,” said Aaron White, the report’s first author and a senior scientific adviser at the alcohol abuse institute.
“Stress is the primary factor in relapse, and there is no question there was a big increase in self-reported stress, and big increases in anxiety and depression, and planet-wide uncertainty about what was coming next,” he said. “That’s a lot of pressure on people who are trying to maintain recovery.”
While stress from the pandemic was certainly demanding, the government and media’s amplification of it was far greater. Couple the 24/7 constant fear mongering from the media with the unscientific lockdowns by the state which put millions of people out of work and the establishment created the perfect storm.
As the media and government attempt to claim this is some new phenomenon, the record will show that there was an entire body of science pointing these things out as they were unfolding in real time. Sadly, however, those doctors and scientists were banned from social media, had their licenses revoked, and were silenced into oblivion as the problem they tried to stop, got worse.
The Free Thought Project was reporting on this since the beginning in regard to overdoses which soared to historically deadly rates. In 2020, as California was shutting down outdoor parks and outlawed outdoor kissing, residents turned to drugs and alcohol to cope with their new tyrannical world. By December 2020, 360 percent more people had died from overdose than died from covid.
It wasn’t just California either. a year later, we would find that the number one killer of all Americans aged 18-45 was not covid-19 but overdose.
Perhaps the worst part about this was that it was mostly preventable — had the authoritarians not seized control of the narrative and shut down all discussion other than their own.
Recall how they MOCKED us? 1) Government scientist Prof Scally believed it was “STUPID” to question if lockdown saved lives – 31 Oct 2020:https://t.co/wmYJD2vB9K 2) Media now: “lockdown didn’t prevent people dying..MISTAKE ON A GLOBAL SCALE” 26 Mar 2022https://t.co/XhUXrjWgFr pic.twitter.com/oqYLRwQUH7 — Maajid أبو عمّار (@MaajidNawaz) March 28, 2022
It’s not just alcohol and overdoses either. Have we forgotten that politicians, all claiming to “follow the science,” locked us down, destroyed the economy, decimated the middle class through inflation, forcibly medicated us, and muzzled our children over the last two years?
Where is the accountability for the folks who advocated these things? Are we to forget about the two weeks to flatten the curve that turned into rampant police brutality for non-compliance, tens of thousands of closed businesses, jjab passports, and record child suicides?
As the lockdown tyrants slowly shift their narrative in an overt attempt to move from the wrong side of history to the right side, we must remind them that it is too late. They are no longer relevant and their censorship, quack science, and tyranny will never be forgotten.
Says the woman who advocated masking children, closing schools, and arresting the unvaccinated. We remember, Dr. Wen. You can pretend to be on our rational side now, but your previous actions facilitated the suffering of millions for two years. This, we will never forget. — Matt Agorist (@MattAgorist) March 23, 2022
By Matt Agorist, TheFreeThoughtProject.com