humansarefree--2020-08-20--Club of Rome Declared ‘Planetary Emergency Plan’

Club of Rome was originally founded at a meeting in David Rockefeller ’ s house in Bellagio , Italy , and promoted alarmism over population growth .
Its 1973 book , Limits to Growth , coincided with the creation of the Trilateral Commission , also by Rockefeller .
They are still at it .
This text is taken from the Club of Rome ’ s 2002 report , Planetary Emergency Plan : Securing a New Deal for People , Nature and Climate .
In that the Great Panic of 2020 ( pandemic ) is currently dominating the new cycle , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that radical climate change alarmism has gone away .
To the contrary , it is just waiting for the massive funding that will be sprung during the Great Reset .
– TN Editor For 10,000 years , human civilisation has grown and thrived because of Earth ’ s remarkable climate stability and rich biological diversity .
In the last 50 years , human activity has severly undermined this resilience .
Our patterns of economic growth , development , production and consumption are pushing the Earth ’ s life-support systems beyond their natural boundaries @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our global commons on which we so fundamentally depend – is now at risk .
The science is clear that we are now accelerating towards tipping points and that the consequences of inaction will be catastrophic for humanity .
The time to act is running out .
This is a Planetary Emergency .
The definition of an emergency is a dangerous event requiring immediate action to reduce risk of potentially catastrophic results .
The impacts of climate change and ecological destruction are more severe and are manifesting themselves earlier than many scientific predictions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ most authoritative global scientific assessments conclude that without major interventions , the risks will soon reach a critical stage .
We need to stabilise the climate at 1.5°C above pre-industrial temperatures , halt the loss of biodiversity , slow polar ice sheet melt and glacier retreat , protect critical biomes and store more carbon in soils , forests and oceans .
This is how we will guarantee the longterm health and well-being of both people and planet .
To do that , however , our response to this complex emergency must reflect the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the systems that regulate it .
It must address the convergence of crises and tipping points which have created this Planetary Emergency .
We have no more time for incremental , siloed policy action .
2020 is a “ Super Year ” for international policy action .
It is the 75th anniversary of the United Nations .
It is the first opportunity for nations to increase climate ambition and meet 2050 net-zero goals .
A new treaty on the oceans will be agreed .
Biodiversity targets will be announced .
And 2020 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to scale action to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals .
This decade must be a turning point , the moment when the world bends the curve , averts the impending disaster and opts instead to embark on the fastest economic transformation in our history .
Declaring a Planetary Emergency provides a new compass for nations and injects the essential urgency into decision-making .
It will ensure that all action from 2020 will be taken in light of its impact on the stability of Earth ’ s life-support systems , and be underpinned by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ secure the long-term health and well-being of people and planet .
While our efforts should be global , our responses must be local .
They should be tailored to local needs , resources and cultures to ensure they have maximum impact and work to everyone ’ s advantage .
The existential risk is real .
Yet , the opportunities to not just avert disaster but to rebuild , improve and regenerate are readily available .
History has shown that humanity is remarkably resilient .
We are well adapted to respond to disaster through @ @ @ @ @ @ @ consequences we face this time are different – we have a narrow window to act now to reduce risk or avoid catastrophe .
We don ’ t know how to reconstruct the cryosphere , the hydrological cycle , the rainforests , coral reefs and all other life-support systems on Earth .
Once the emergency fully manifests itself , it will simply be too late to reverse the breakdown .
As well as halting climate change and protecting nature , these efforts will improve health , livelihoods and equity and create more liveable and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proposed commitments and underpinning action are of the scale needed to respond to the emergency facing people and planet .
Our aim is to protect the Global Commons through 10 clear commitments , and ensure they are met by immediately implementing a set of transformational policy and market levers .
This is our insurance policy to emerge from emergency and guarantee a just transition for all .
We invite nations to discuss the case for a Planetary Emergency Plan .
We propose such a plan be founded on the urgent need to halve @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reach carbon-neutrality by 2050 , while halting biodiversity loss and protecting essential Global Commons .
Such an initiative is consistent with the Sustainable Development Goals to end poverty and improve quality of life .
We can emerge from emergency to a world which benefits all species , within planetary boundaries and leaving no one behind .
This is the world we envisage , and the world to which we must all aspire .
The science is clear : the climate and biodiversity are fully integrated and interdependent .
Every year since the Industrial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ absorbed close to half of all emissions from fossil-fuel burning .
Without nature ’ s ability to absorb and store our GHG emissions , we would have already exceeded 2°C of warming , with potentially disastrous consequences .
Breaching this threshold of warming could push the planet towards irreversible and catastrophic biosphere feedbacks When climate change alters a chink in the planetary system , it can set off a chain of negative feedback loops .
Increasing droughts , for instance , are reducing the ability of tropical forests to store carbon , making @ @ @ @ @ @ @ yet more GHG emissions .
The significant loss of the Cryosphere has reduced the albedo capacity of key Earth systems to reflect heat away from the planet .
The higher the temperature , the more permafrost thaws , with greater emissions of both CO2 and methane , leading to even greater warming and triggering further negative feedback loops .
At least one million species risk disappearance , many within decades .
Food chains could disintegrate and vital ecosystems collapse .
Species diversity and ecosystems integrity play a fundamental role in regulating the climate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ food production .

Club of Rome was originally founded at a meeting in David Rockefeller’s house in Bellagio, Italy, and promoted alarmism over population growth. Its 1973 book, Limits to Growth, coincided with the creation of the Trilateral Commission, also by Rockefeller. They are still at it.
This text is taken from the Club of Rome’s 2002 report, Planetary Emergency Plan: Securing a New Deal for People, Nature and Climate.
In that the Great Panic of 2020 (pandemic) is currently dominating the new cycle, don’t think for a minute that radical climate change alarmism has gone away. To the contrary, it is just waiting for the massive funding that will be sprung during the Great Reset. – TN Editor
For 10,000 years, human civilisation has grown and thrived because of Earth’s remarkable climate stability and rich biological diversity.
In the last 50 years, human activity has severly undermined this resilience. Our patterns of economic growth, development, production and consumption are pushing the Earth’s life-support systems beyond their natural boundaries.
The stability of these systems – our global commons on which we so fundamentally depend – is now at risk. The science is clear that we are now accelerating towards tipping points and that the consequences of inaction will be catastrophic for humanity. The time to act is running out.
This is a Planetary Emergency. The definition of an emergency is a dangerous event requiring immediate action to reduce risk of potentially catastrophic results.
The impacts of climate change and ecological destruction are more severe and are manifesting themselves earlier than many scientific predictions in previous decades had foreseen. The most authoritative global scientific assessments conclude that without major interventions, the risks will soon reach a critical stage.
We need to stabilise the climate at 1.5°C above pre-industrial temperatures, halt the loss of biodiversity, slow polar ice sheet melt and glacier retreat, protect critical biomes and store more carbon in soils, forests and oceans.
This is how we will guarantee the longterm health and well-being of both people and planet. To do that, however, our response to this complex emergency must reflect the intricate links between life on our planet and the systems that regulate it.
It must address the convergence of crises and tipping points which have created this Planetary Emergency. We have no more time for incremental, siloed policy action.
2020 is a “Super Year” for international policy action. It is the 75th anniversary of the United Nations. It is the first opportunity for nations to increase climate ambition and meet 2050 net-zero goals. A new treaty on the oceans will be agreed. Biodiversity targets will be announced.
And 2020 will mark the beginning of the decade to scale action to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. This decade must be a turning point, the moment when the world bends the curve, averts the impending disaster and opts instead to embark on the fastest economic transformation in our history.
Declaring a Planetary Emergency provides a new compass for nations and injects the essential urgency into decision-making.
It will ensure that all action from 2020 will be taken in light of its impact on the stability of Earth’s life-support systems, and be underpinned by the social and economic transformations needed to secure the long-term health and well-being of people and planet.
While our efforts should be global, our responses must be local. They should be tailored to local needs, resources and cultures to ensure they have maximum impact and work to everyone’s advantage.
The existential risk is real. Yet, the opportunities to not just avert disaster but to rebuild, improve and regenerate are readily available. History has shown that humanity is remarkably resilient.
We are well adapted to respond to disaster through cooperation and innovation. But the potential consequences we face this time are different – we have a narrow window to act now to reduce risk or avoid catastrophe.
We don’t know how to reconstruct the cryosphere, the hydrological cycle, the rainforests, coral reefs and all other life-support systems on Earth.
Once the emergency fully manifests itself, it will simply be too late to reverse the breakdown. As well as halting climate change and protecting nature, these efforts will improve health, livelihoods and equity and create more liveable and sustainable cities and rural communities.
Our proposed commitments and underpinning action are of the scale needed to respond to the emergency facing people and planet.
Our aim is to protect the Global Commons through 10 clear commitments, and ensure they are met by immediately implementing a set of transformational policy and market levers. This is our insurance policy to emerge from emergency and guarantee a just transition for all.
We invite nations to discuss the case for a Planetary Emergency Plan. We propose such a plan be founded on the urgent need to halve greenhouse gas emissions by 2030, to reach carbon-neutrality by 2050, while halting biodiversity loss and protecting essential Global Commons.
Such an initiative is consistent with the Sustainable Development Goals to end poverty and improve quality of life.
We can emerge from emergency to a world which benefits all species, within planetary boundaries and leaving no one behind. This is the world we envisage, and the world to which we must all aspire.
The Rationale For Emergency Action
The science is clear: the climate and biodiversity are fully integrated and interdependent. Every year since the Industrial Revolution, land-based and ocean ecosystems have absorbed close to half of all emissions from fossil-fuel burning.
Without nature’s ability to absorb and store our GHG emissions, we would have already exceeded 2°C of warming, with potentially disastrous consequences. Breaching this threshold of warming could push the planet towards irreversible and catastrophic biosphere feedbacks
When climate change alters a chink in the planetary system, it can set off a chain of negative feedback loops. Increasing droughts, for instance, are reducing the ability of tropical forests to store carbon, making them more prone to fires, releasing yet more GHG emissions.
The significant loss of the Cryosphere has reduced the albedo capacity of key Earth systems to reflect heat away from the planet.
The higher the temperature, the more permafrost thaws, with greater emissions of both CO2 and methane, leading to even greater warming and triggering further negative feedback loops.
At least one million species risk disappearance, many within decades. Food chains could disintegrate and vital ecosystems collapse. Species diversity and ecosystems integrity play a fundamental role in regulating the climate, water cycles, carbon sequestration and food production.
Read full story here. Via Technocracy.news


humansarefree--2020-08-20--Mother Finds Stolen Images of Her Baby Daughter on Pedophile Website

A mother is learning the horrific reality of the internet , every picture you post online can be saved and shared with others and that includes pedophiles sharing photos of your children , Unilad reported .
Amanda Morgan , a 29-year-old mother of a baby girl , recently discovered the dangers of parents sharing pictures of their children publicly on social media .
She is openly warning others after she found pictures of her baby girl Callia on a Russian website which its name has been redacted from this report and handed off to Anons .
The pictures were first @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , called “ cute baby pages.
” However , the page lead to a darker website where they are editing toddlers ’ pictures and putting them in makeup or sexualizing them .
When parents uncovered the website they worked quick to attempt to get it closed down were quick to alarm Amanda about her daughter ’ s pictures being taken advantage of in such a horrific way .
Going back to the frightening traumatizing moment when she discovered her baby ’ s photographs were being exploited for child pornography content , Amanda said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ minutes when I received that message .
My partner couldn ’ t calm me down , I was sobbing and shaking .
I thought it was all my fault because I had this Instagram page .
There are three pictures of my child on that website , I haven ’ t dolled her up like that , I wouldn ’ t want to put my baby in make-up.
” Amanda decided to set up an account on the website despite knowing tthe dangers of doing so .
What she discovered was ‘ thousands @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Baby Callia ’ s pictures had received monstrous comments by users of the Russian website .
“ These kids are getting abused and getting pictures taken of them by their own parents .
I just feel so sick and I feel sad for those babies .
As sickening as the comments were on Callia ’ s , they were mild .
The other stuff that ’ s on there is even worse .
I nearly threw up , I was literally retching like I was going to be sick .
I ’ ve @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out , ” Amanda said .
Ever since this horrific disturbing incident , Amanda has been echoing warnings to parents not to share pictures of their children , or to at least make their social media accounts completely private .
“ My child is covered , she ’ s wearing a long-sleeved jumper and a skirt in one of the pictures and you can ’ t see any of her skin .
I would say to parents to make sure they ’ re covered in any pictures they share , never naked or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to take those pictures just keep them to yourself , don ’ t put them anywhere for these creeps to get hold of.
” Did you know ?
Grooming Tripled On Social Media – Pedophiles Are Hunting Children As Young As 5 On Instagram , Snapchat And Facebook With social media evolving so are tools to keep yourself safe .
A new social media platform SoMee.Social , gives its users full control of their data allowing users to decide what pictures , posts , and very soon videos are shared with friends , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ select friends .
The platform also allows users to monetize posts and to sell key points of data to advertisers through its coming Ad Share Market place , without the company doing so behind their backs .
Further , and more importantly relevant to this story the company recently partnered with Cloudflare to use its free Child Sex Abuse Monitoring tool , which its one of the first social media platforms to do so .
All websites using Cloudflare can use its tool to identify Child Abuse imagery and videos being shared on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ working more closely with Cloudflare , while still championing its values of free speech for users .
When using social networks you should always be conscious about everything you share and be aware that what ’ s on the internet is there forever .
Follow the rules , if you wouldn ’ t want everyone to see it , keep it private .
If you or someone you know has been affected by similar problems and need to speak to someone in confidence regarding the welfare of a child , contact the NSPCC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pm Monday to Friday , 9 am–6 pm in the UK .
If you are an American you can contact CPS ( Child Protection Services ) at 1-800-4-A-CHILD or Child Welfare League Of America ( CWLA ) at 202-688-4200 .

A mother is learning the horrific reality of the internet, every picture you post online can be saved and shared with others and that includes pedophiles sharing photos of your children, Unilad reported.
Amanda Morgan, a 29-year-old mother of a baby girl, recently discovered the dangers of parents sharing pictures of their children publicly on social media.
She is openly warning others after she found pictures of her baby girl Callia on a Russian website which its name has been redacted from this report and handed off to Anons.
The pictures were first shared in a Facebook and Instagram group, called “cute baby pages.” However, the page lead to a darker website where they are editing toddlers’ pictures and putting them in makeup or sexualizing them.
When parents uncovered the website they worked quick to attempt to get it closed down were quick to alarm Amanda about her daughter’s pictures being taken advantage of in such a horrific way.
Going back to the frightening traumatizing moment when she discovered her baby’s photographs were being exploited for child pornography content, Amanda said:
“I cried uncontrollably for 45 minutes when I received that message. My partner couldn’t calm me down, I was sobbing and shaking. I thought it was all my fault because I had this Instagram page. There are three pictures of my child on that website, I haven’t dolled her up like that, I wouldn’t want to put my baby in make-up.”
Amanda decided to set up an account on the website despite knowing tthe dangers of doing so.
What she discovered was ‘thousands of users with paedophile usernames’. Baby Callia’s pictures had received monstrous comments by users of the Russian website.
“These kids are getting abused and getting pictures taken of them by their own parents. I just feel so sick and I feel sad for those babies. As sickening as the comments were on Callia’s, they were mild. The other stuff that’s on there is even worse. I nearly threw up, I was literally retching like I was going to be sick. I’ve not been sleeping properly since I found out,” Amanda said.
Ever since this horrific disturbing incident, Amanda has been echoing warnings to parents not to share pictures of their children, or to at least make their social media accounts completely private.
“My child is covered, she’s wearing a long-sleeved jumper and a skirt in one of the pictures and you can’t see any of her skin. I would say to parents to make sure they’re covered in any pictures they share, never naked or in the bath. If you want to take those pictures just keep them to yourself, don’t put them anywhere for these creeps to get hold of.”
Did you know? Grooming Tripled On Social Media – Pedophiles Are Hunting Children As Young As 5 On Instagram, Snapchat And Facebook
With social media evolving so are tools to keep yourself safe. A new social media platform SoMee.Social, gives its users full control of their data allowing users to decide what pictures, posts, and very soon videos are shared with friends, the public, and in the future select friends.
The platform also allows users to monetize posts and to sell key points of data to advertisers through its coming Ad Share Market place, without the company doing so behind their backs.
Further, and more importantly relevant to this story the company recently partnered with Cloudflare to use its free Child Sex Abuse Monitoring tool, which its one of the first social media platforms to do so.
All websites using Cloudflare can use its tool to identify Child Abuse imagery and videos being shared on their servers. But SoMee will be working more closely with Cloudflare, while still championing its values of free speech for users.
When using social networks you should always be conscious about everything you share and be aware that what’s on the internet is there forever. Follow the rules, if you wouldn’t want everyone to see it, keep it private.
If you or someone you know has been affected by similar problems and need to speak to someone in confidence regarding the welfare of a child, contact the NSPCC on 0808 800 5000, 8 am–10 pm Monday to Friday, 9 am–6 pm in the UK.
If you are an American you can contact CPS (Child Protection Services) at 1-800-4-A-CHILD or Child Welfare League Of America (CWLA) at 202-688-4200.
Source: Anewspost.com


humansarefree--2020-08-20--Progressive Sex Education and the Battle for Our Children

Progressive activists seek to expand sex education in schools across America to include topics such as sexual orientation and gender @ @ @ @ @ also promotes abortion .
On today ’ s episode of “ The Daily Signal Podcast @ @ @ @ @ on The Heritage Foundation ’ s virtual event Wednesday , the Protecting Children in Education @ @ @ @ @ proposed leftist curriculum and address how Americans can stand against the sexualization of children .
@ @ @ @ @ Irene H. Ericksen , senior research analyst at the Institute for Research & Evaluation ; @ @ @ @ @ sex educator with Planned Parenthood who founded the group It Takes a Family ; and @ @ @ @ @ O ’ Beirne fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center .
Serving as moderator @ @ @ @ @ Butcher , senior policy analyst at Heritage ’ s Center for Education Policy .

Progressive activists seek to expand sex education in schools across America to include topics such as sexual orientation and gender identity. Their proposed curriculum also promotes abortion.
On today’s episode of “The Daily Signal Podcast,” we listen in on The Heritage Foundation’s virtual event Wednesday, the Protecting Children in Education Summit.
Participants break down proposed leftist curriculum and address how Americans can stand against the sexualization of children.
We’ll hear from Irene H. Ericksen, senior research analyst at the Institute for Research & Evaluation; Monica Cline, a former sex educator with Planned Parenthood who founded the group It Takes a Family; and Mary Hasson, the Kate O’Beirne fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.
Serving as moderator for the discussion is Jonathan Butcher, senior policy analyst at Heritage’s Center for Education Policy.
Sources: DailySignal.com; Shows.acast.com/thedailysignal


humansarefree--2020-08-21--Teacher Sues School After Being Fired for Refusing to Use Transgender Pronouns

A Virginia teacher fired for refusing to use the requested pronouns of a transgender-identifying student is taking his school district to court over the dismissal , claiming that U.S. law protects his decision .
Peter Vlaming was a history and French professor at West Point High School in West Point , Virginia , in 2018 when a female student of his announced a transition to a male identity and requested that her instructors refer to her using male pronouns .
Vlaming refused to do so , though he claims he initially struck an amicable compromise with the student in question @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that he would be required to use male pronouns to refer to the student , in and out of her presence .
The school finally told him that if he used female pronouns to refer to the student – or even if the district suspected he was using her name to avoid referring to her pronouns altogether – he would be terminated .
Vlaming , who is Christian , refused to abide by those terms , leading to his firing , The Daily Signal reports .
The instructor is suing the West Point @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the conservative Alliance Defending Freedom representing him .
The suit argues that Supreme Court precedent establishes Vlaming ’ s right not to use transgender pronouns .
“ It has indeed come to this , ” he told the Signal .

A Virginia teacher fired for refusing to use the requested pronouns of a transgender-identifying student is taking his school district to court over the dismissal, claiming that U.S. law protects his decision.
by Daniel Payne
Peter Vlaming was a history and French professor at West Point High School in West Point, Virginia, in 2018 when a female student of his announced a transition to a male identity and requested that her instructors refer to her using male pronouns.
Vlaming refused to do so, though he claims he initially struck an amicable compromise with the student in question.
Yet school leadership eventually told him that he would be required to use male pronouns to refer to the student, in and out of her presence.
The school finally told him that if he used female pronouns to refer to the student – or even if the district suspected he was using her name to avoid referring to her pronouns altogether – he would be terminated.
Vlaming, who is Christian, refused to abide by those terms, leading to his firing, The Daily Signal reports.
The instructor is suing the West Point Public Schools system over the firing, with the conservative Alliance Defending Freedom representing him.
The suit argues that Supreme Court precedent establishes Vlaming’s right not to use transgender pronouns.
“It has indeed come to this,” he told the Signal.


humansarefree--2020-08-21--750 Million Genetically Engineered Mosquitoes Are Being Released In Florida Despite Environmental Op

750 Million Genetically Engineered Mosquitoes Are Being Released In Florida Despite Environmental Opposition

Releasing these mosquitoes has been discussed for the last 5 years .
It has been considered controversial from the start .
Now it ’ s actually going to happen and comparing this to a “ Jurassic Park experiment ” doesn ’ t seem inappropriate .
Why Hundreds of Millions of Genetically Engineered Mosquitoes Will Soon Be Released in Florida Hundreds of millions of genetically engineered mosquitoes will soon be released in Florida , in a first for the U.S. On Tuesday , the Florida Keys Mosquito Control District ( FKMCD ) approved plans to release the insects , who do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pilot project launching next year .
Precisely when and where the trial will happen in Monroe County is yet to be determined , the FKMCD said , but an experimental use permit expires in 2022 .
According to the non-profit Center for Food Safety public interest and environmental advocacy organization , which opposes the move , 750 million genetically modified mosquitoes will be set free .
Oxitec , a biotechnology company whose trademarked “ Friendly ” mosquitoes are at the center of the project , had previously been given regulatory approval by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC ) , and the Florida Department of Health , among other state agencies .
Why are the mosquitoes being released ?
The Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) has a long history of approving bad products .
Recently they ’ ve been warning about and recalling toxic , blinding , and deadly hand sanitizers ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ) .
The agency has also been blamed for significantly contributing to the Opioid Crisis .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ will also come back and bite them in the ass .

Releasing these mosquitoes has been discussed for the last 5 years. It has been considered controversial from the start.
Now it’s actually going to happen and comparing this to a “Jurassic Park experiment” doesn’t seem inappropriate.
From Newsweek:
Why Hundreds of Millions of Genetically Engineered Mosquitoes Will Soon Be Released in Florida
Hundreds of millions of genetically engineered mosquitoes will soon be released in Florida, in a first for the U.S.
On Tuesday, the Florida Keys Mosquito Control District (FKMCD) approved plans to release the insects, who do not bite, as part of a pilot project launching next year.
Precisely when and where the trial will happen in Monroe County is yet to be determined, the FKMCD said, but an experimental use permit expires in 2022.
According to the non-profit Center for Food Safety public interest and environmental advocacy organization, which opposes the move, 750 million genetically modified mosquitoes will be set free.
Oxitec, a biotechnology company whose trademarked “Friendly” mosquitoes are at the center of the project, had previously been given regulatory approval by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Florida Department of Health, among other state agencies.
Why are the mosquitoes being released?
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has a long history of approving bad products. Recently they’ve been warning about and recalling toxic, blinding, and deadly hand sanitizers (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). The agency has also been blamed for significantly contributing to the Opioid Crisis. Only time will tell if these mosquitoes will also come back and bite them in the ass.
Sources: Newsweek.com; Activistpost.com


humansarefree--2020-08-21--New Photos Show Bill Clinton Getting A Massage From One Of Epstein’s Victims

In new photos recently obtained by the Daily Mail , Bill Clinton can be seen getting a massage from one of Jeffrey Epstein ’ s young victims .
The victim , Chauntae Davies , was 22-years-old at the time that the photos were taken , and she says that nothing inappropriate happened between her and Clinton , but these new photos certainly cast more suspicion on Clinton and his involvement with Epstein ’ s crimes .
Although Davies was an adult when she was photographed with the former president and claims he was a “ perfect gentlemen ” , she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Maxwell to be a massage therapist and then raped by the couple and their friends , which is a familiar story among their victims .
Many of the victims say that they were initially invited to Epstein ’ s home by Maxwell under the pretense of giving a rich man a massage , and then found that much more was expected of them behind closed doors .
The photos that were released this week were reportedly taken aboard Epstein ’ s private jet , during an alleged humanitarian trip in Africa .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Spacey and Chris Tucker .
Kevin Spacey now has numerous rape allegations against him , many including underage children .
Spacey was photographed in the company of Epstein and Maxwell on numerous occasions , including a photo that was taken sitting in the throne room in Buckingham palace with Maxwell .
In the photos , Clinton can be seen laughing as Davies rubbed his shoulders and neck .
Davies says that Maxwell insisted for her to give Clinton a massage , and that he was eager to get to one .
Davies recalled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she asked him to “ get on his knees ” so she could get a better angle on his neck for the massage , entirely forgetting about his scandal with Monica Lewinski .
For a moment the room fell silent .
I couldn ’ t believe I ’ d said that .
The words just shot out before I realized what I was saying or who I said it to .
Then , although his face had turned the color of fire , he laughed .
The whole room was laughing too .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ was , he sat down so I could get a better angle , Davies explained .
It is well-documented that Clinton was closely connected with both Epstein and Maxwell , and spent a significant amount of time on Epstein ’ s island [ including with “ two young girls ” ] .
He also continued to hang out with them after they were both exposed as sex offenders .
In fact , Maxwell was served court papers relating to the Epstein trafficking ring in 2009 while she was attending the Clinton Global Initiative @ @ @ @ @ @ @ City .
Just a few months later , Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton ’ s wedding , and Bill continued his relationship with both of them for many years despite the public knowledge of their crimes .
After Epstein was arrested last year , The Clinton Foundation was forced to respond to the allegations that the former president was a participant in Epstein ’ s trafficking network .
“ Knows nothing about the terrible crimes Jeffrey Epstein pleaded guilty to.
” According to newly released court documents , one of Epstein ’ s victims @ @ @ @ @ @ @ jet with two underage girls , and spent time with them on the financier ’ s notorious island…

In new photos recently obtained by the Daily Mail, Bill Clinton can be seen getting a massage from one of Jeffrey Epstein’s young victims.
by John Vibes (excerpt)
The victim, Chauntae Davies, was 22-years-old at the time that the photos were taken, and she says that nothing inappropriate happened between her and Clinton, but these new photos certainly cast more suspicion on Clinton and his involvement with Epstein’s crimes.
Although Davies was an adult when she was photographed with the former president and claims he was a “perfect gentlemen”, she was initially recruited by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell to be a massage therapist and then raped by the couple and their friends, which is a familiar story among their victims.
Many of the victims say that they were initially invited to Epstein’s home by Maxwell under the pretense of giving a rich man a massage, and then found that much more was expected of them behind closed doors.
The photos that were released this week were reportedly taken aboard Epstein’s private jet, during an alleged humanitarian trip in Africa. The trip also included the famous actors Kevin Spacey and Chris Tucker.
Kevin Spacey now has numerous rape allegations against him, many including underage children.
Spacey was photographed in the company of Epstein and Maxwell on numerous occasions, including a photo that was taken sitting in the throne room in Buckingham palace with Maxwell.
In the photos, Clinton can be seen laughing as Davies rubbed his shoulders and neck. Davies says that Maxwell insisted for her to give Clinton a massage, and that he was eager to get to one.
Davies recalled a funny moment with Clinton, where she asked him to “get on his knees” so she could get a better angle on his neck for the massage, entirely forgetting about his scandal with Monica Lewinski.
For a moment the room fell silent. I couldn’t believe I’d said that. The words just shot out before I realized what I was saying or who I said it to.
Then, although his face had turned the color of fire, he laughed. The whole room was laughing too. And, being the good sport he was, he sat down so I could get a better angle, Davies explained.
It is well-documented that Clinton was closely connected with both Epstein and Maxwell, and spent a significant amount of time on Epstein’s island [including with “two young girls”].
He also continued to hang out with them after they were both exposed as sex offenders.
In fact, Maxwell was served court papers relating to the Epstein trafficking ring in 2009 while she was attending the Clinton Global Initiative at the Sheraton Hotel in New York City.
Just a few months later, Maxwell attended Chelsea Clinton’s wedding, and Bill continued his relationship with both of them for many years despite the public knowledge of their crimes.
After Epstein was arrested last year, The Clinton Foundation was forced to respond to the allegations that the former president was a participant in Epstein’s trafficking network.
The foundation claimed that Clinton:
“Knows nothing about the terrible crimes Jeffrey Epstein pleaded guilty to.”
According to newly released court documents, one of Epstein’s victims says that Clinton flew on the private jet with two underage girls, and spent time with them on the financier’s notorious island…


humansarefree--2020-08-21--Americans May Be Stuck With Soros Forever

George Soros had some tough words for Donald Trump , calling him “ dangerous ” and willing to do “ anything to stay in power.
” But what about the financier himself , who operates across the globe outside of democratic due process ?
The life of the billionaire financier seems to be one long battle against the purported enemies of the ‘ open society ’ – a controversial concept popularized by Karl Popper , a Vienna-born philosopher who wrote ‘ The Open Society and Its Enemies ’ .
Chief among his sworn adversaries is Trump , whose ‘ Make @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , among other things , a wall constructed on the US-Mexico border and less reliance on foreign factory workers .
On the occasion of his 90th birthday this week , Soros sat down for an interview with the Italian newspaper La Repubblica , in which he expressed some strident views about the US president .
“ I ’ m confident that Trump will turn out to be a transitory phenomenon , hopefully ending in November , ” Soros remarked .
“ But he remains very dangerous .
He ’ s fighting for his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to stay in power , because he ’ s violated the Constitution in many different ways and if he loses the presidency , he will be held accountable.
” For anyone who has followed the trajectory of Soros ’ s lengthy career , those remarks will probably come across as self-serving and hypocritical .
After all , the man who famously broke the Bank of England back in his relative youth does not feel constrained by any sort of democratic procedure , nor is he controlled by a system of checks and balances @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Soros , by virtue of his magnificent wealth alone , it seems , is able to create the world of his dreams – and not a single person has ever cast a vote on whether they support his grand plans or not .
Take the latest protests to hit the United States , for example , following the death of George Floyd at the hands of a white police officer .
At an extremely sensitive juncture in American history , when racial tensions were at breaking point , Soros decided this was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ quarter of a billion dollars to several racial justice groups , including Black Lives Matter ( BLM ) , which is responsible for violent protests in cities across the nation .
Soros said he was moved to act because this was the first time in the US “ that a large majority of the population , other than black people , recognizes that there is systemic discrimination against blacks that can be traced back to slavery.
” Soros is wrong , however – or at least needs to be challenged on his perceptions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reject the notion that the country is gripped by “ systemic discrimination ” and racism .
While there are certainly no shortage of bigots in the US , as there are everywhere , blacks and whites have been working together for many decades to achieve racial equality .
And let ’ s face it : no American alive today has been a slave owner , just as no black person today has ever been a slave .
So , why is Soros dragging up the institution of slavery , which came to an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the deadliest war in America ’ s history ?
But donating money to controversial activist groups is child ’ s play compared to reshaping the American justice system .
Yes , Soros has been quietly dabbling in that project as well .
In 2016 , it was reported that he ’ d donated over $ 3 million to progressive black and Hispanic candidates for district attorney campaigns .
One beneficiary of that largesse is Kim Gardner , who is now the circuit attorney for St. Louis , Missouri .
To understand what sort @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Gardner pressed charges against Mark and Patricia McCloskey , a married couple who responded to BLM protesters trespassing onto their property and making threatening gestures by brandishing firearms .
The couple said they exerted their Second Amendment right to “ bear arms ” out of fear for their lives .
Yet , according to Soros-backed Gardner , they were out of bounds .
This all seems to be part of a very weird trend happening in Democrat-controlled cities and states , many of which have received Soros money : at the same time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ urban centers , calls are going out to “ defund the police , ” while average citizens are losing the right to protect themselves from harm .
And Soros ’ s influence is not limited to the US .
Not by a long shot .
In 2018 , he was audacious enough and , more importantly , rich enough , to promote his plans for “ saving ” the European Union from an “ existential crisis.
” This centered on three controversial ideas : providing monetary assistance to countries in Africa and other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the EU ; addressing the question of austerity , which is ironic , considering that Europeans are being asked to do more for foreigners while expecting to receive less assistance from their governments ; and finally , Brexit , which Soros says is a bad idea for the United Kingdom .
Now , whether or not one agrees or disagrees with Soros on these issues , and many others , is not the point ( for a more sympathetic view of Mr Soros , read this ) .
The point is that one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ public office , and is not accountable to voters , has managed to exert unfathomable influence over the political landscape of many nations .
For anyone who doubts that assertion , consider the 177-page pamphlet published by Open Society , entitled ‘ Reliable Allies in the European Parliament ( 2014–2019 ) .
’ In it , 226 EU MEPs are listed and labeled according to their political orientation and views .
According to the publication , “ The presence of an MEP in this mapping indicates that they are likely to support Open @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are 751 members of the European Parliament , ‘ reliable allies ’ of George Soros hold at least one-third of seats.
” That revelation becomes even more problematic when it ’ s remembered that Soros donated $ 18 billion to Open Society Foundations in 2017 , making it one of the largest philanthropic organizations in the world .
While some may argue that Soros has done many great things with his money , there are many people who disagree .
Yet they have no zero say in the matter , simply because they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from which to promote their views , however haphazard they may be .
In the case of Donald Trump , for example , the American people will be able to vote in November , if they want him to remain in the White House for another four years .
Yet , although Soros ’ s contribution to the world of politics is arguably no less than Trump ’ s , and possibly more , nobody is permitted to vote on his controversial agendas .
If Soros were genuinely concerned about the people , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more democracy to shine in his gold-plated world .
The fact that he does not says everything we need to know .
Robert Bridge is an American writer and journalist .
He is the author of the book , ‘ Midnight in the American Empire , ’ How Corporations and Their Political Servants are Destroying the American Dream .

George Soros had some tough words for Donald Trump, calling him “dangerous” and willing to do “anything to stay in power.” But what about the financier himself, who operates across the globe outside of democratic due process?
The life of the billionaire financier seems to be one long battle against the purported enemies of the ‘open society’ – a controversial concept popularized by Karl Popper, a Vienna-born philosopher who wrote ‘The Open Society and Its Enemies’.
Chief among his sworn adversaries is Trump, whose ‘Make America Great Again’ campaign calls for, among other things, a wall constructed on the US-Mexico border and less reliance on foreign factory workers.
On the occasion of his 90th birthday this week, Soros sat down for an interview with the Italian newspaper La Repubblica, in which he expressed some strident views about the US president.
“I’m confident that Trump will turn out to be a transitory phenomenon, hopefully ending in November,” Soros remarked. “But he remains very dangerous. He’s fighting for his life and he’ll do anything to stay in power, because he’s violated the Constitution in many different ways and if he loses the presidency, he will be held accountable.”
For anyone who has followed the trajectory of Soros’s lengthy career, those remarks will probably come across as self-serving and hypocritical.
After all, the man who famously broke the Bank of England back in his relative youth does not feel constrained by any sort of democratic procedure, nor is he controlled by a system of checks and balances, as are elected officials.
Instead, Soros, by virtue of his magnificent wealth alone, it seems, is able to create the world of his dreams – and not a single person has ever cast a vote on whether they support his grand plans or not.
Take the latest protests to hit the United States, for example, following the death of George Floyd at the hands of a white police officer.
At an extremely sensitive juncture in American history, when racial tensions were at breaking point, Soros decided this was the perfect time to donate almost a quarter of a billion dollars to several racial justice groups, including Black Lives Matter (BLM), which is responsible for violent protests in cities across the nation.
Soros said he was moved to act because this was the first time in the US “that a large majority of the population, other than black people, recognizes that there is systemic discrimination against blacks that can be traced back to slavery.”
Soros is wrong, however – or at least needs to be challenged on his perceptions. Many Americans, including blacks, reject the notion that the country is gripped by “systemic discrimination” and racism.
While there are certainly no shortage of bigots in the US, as there are everywhere, blacks and whites have been working together for many decades to achieve racial equality.
And let’s face it: no American alive today has been a slave owner, just as no black person today has ever been a slave.
So, why is Soros dragging up the institution of slavery, which came to an end almost 200 years ago, following the deadliest war in America’s history?
But donating money to controversial activist groups is child’s play compared to reshaping the American justice system. Yes, Soros has been quietly dabbling in that project as well.
In 2016, it was reported that he’d donated over $3 million to progressive black and Hispanic candidates for district attorney campaigns. One beneficiary of that largesse is Kim Gardner, who is now the circuit attorney for St. Louis, Missouri.
To understand what sort of ‘progressive’ Soros prefers, Gardner pressed charges against Mark and Patricia McCloskey, a married couple who responded to BLM protesters trespassing onto their property and making threatening gestures by brandishing firearms.
The couple said they exerted their Second Amendment right to “bear arms” out of fear for their lives. Yet, according to Soros-backed Gardner, they were out of bounds.
This all seems to be part of a very weird trend happening in Democrat-controlled cities and states, many of which have received Soros money: at the same time that violent protesters are allowed to ransack urban centers, calls are going out to “defund the police,” while average citizens are losing the right to protect themselves from harm.
And Soros’s influence is not limited to the US. Not by a long shot. In 2018, he was audacious enough and, more importantly, rich enough, to promote his plans for “saving” the European Union from an “existential crisis.”
This centered on three controversial ideas: providing monetary assistance to countries in Africa and other developing nations, including through migration to the EU; addressing the question of austerity, which is ironic, considering that Europeans are being asked to do more for foreigners while expecting to receive less assistance from their governments; and finally, Brexit, which Soros says is a bad idea for the United Kingdom.
Now, whether or not one agrees or disagrees with Soros on these issues, and many others, is not the point (for a more sympathetic view of Mr Soros, read this).
The point is that one immensely wealthy man, who holds no public office, and is not accountable to voters, has managed to exert unfathomable influence over the political landscape of many nations.
For anyone who doubts that assertion, consider the 177-page pamphlet published by Open Society, entitled ‘Reliable Allies in the European Parliament (2014–2019).’ In it, 226 EU MEPs are listed and labeled according to their political orientation and views.
According to the publication,
“The presence of an MEP in this mapping indicates that they are likely to support Open Society’s work. Considering there are 751 members of the European Parliament, ‘reliable allies’ of George Soros hold at least one-third of seats.”
That revelation becomes even more problematic when it’s remembered that Soros donated $18 billion to Open Society Foundations in 2017, making it one of the largest philanthropic organizations in the world.
While some may argue that Soros has done many great things with his money, there are many people who disagree. Yet they have no zero say in the matter, simply because they don’t possess a war chest from which to promote their views, however haphazard they may be.
In the case of Donald Trump, for example, the American people will be able to vote in November, if they want him to remain in the White House for another four years.
Yet, although Soros’s contribution to the world of politics is arguably no less than Trump’s, and possibly more, nobody is permitted to vote on his controversial agendas.
If Soros were genuinely concerned about the people, as he proclaims, he would allow more democracy to shine in his gold-plated world. The fact that he does not says everything we need to know.
By Robert Bridge, RT.com
Robert Bridge is an American writer and journalist. He is the author of the book, ‘Midnight in the American Empire,’ How Corporations and Their Political Servants are Destroying the American Dream.


humansarefree--2020-08-21--Identity Politics ‘Plot to Change America’

America always has been a dynamic country of constant change , with its people looking ahead .
But an elite-driven ethos , which has become the dominant ideology of the country ’ s most powerful institutions , threatens to overwhelm the ideas and traits that made America what it is .
In his new book “ The Plot to Change America : How Identity Politics is Dividing the Land of the Free , ” my colleague , Mike Gonzalez , explains how reason , objectivity , and traditional patriotism are being undermined by left-wing ideology and ascendant group identity .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ve seen a remarkable upsurge in “ wokeness , ” and it ’ s no longer confined to radical corners of college campuses .
James Lindsay , co-author of a forthcoming book , “ Cynical Theories : How Activist Scholarship Made Everything About Race , Gender , and Identity — and Why This Harms Everybody , ” succinctly explained what “ wokeness ” means at a recent Heritage Foundation panel discussion : Wokeness is a fusion of the critical theory school of neo-Marxism , which is a form of identity politics , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worldview that separates the world into liberationists versus oppressors , or oppressed versus oppressors .
The glue and fuel of this radical change , as Gonzalez explains in his new book , is identity politics .
Identity politics is now everywhere .
It ’ s embraced by Antifa and Black Lives Matter , as well as by corporate America , the media , and , of course , academia .
Gonzalez breaks down how the left adopted a radical form of identity politics , which is fulfilling its goal of radically transforming American @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this was not a grassroots movement , but one precipitated by an elite intellectual vanguard .
He writes : The fact is that , from the beginning , it has been — and continues to be — an elite project .
For too long , we have accepted the fairy tale that America grew organically into the nation gripped by victimhood and identitarian division that it is today , that it is all the result of legitimate demands by minorities for recognition or restitution for past wrongs .
This intellectual project has roots @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in a series of thinkers in the early and mid-20th century .
Antonio Gramsci , an Italian Marxist thinker , theorized in the 1920s that communism had not really taken root in the West because the working classes had not been conditioned for it .
He made the case for a kind of cultural Marxism that would ultimately transform Western societies .
Gonzalez explains how Gramsci ’ s ideas were absorbed by the German-based Frankfurt School of Critical Theory , and by its leading proponent in America , Herbert Marcuse .
Marcuse , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the 1930s , became a leading figure of the New Left and was an advocate of the radical college campus politics of the 1960s and 1970s .
Part of the strategy of Marcuse and left-wing activists was to mobilize various racial groups who would oppose prevailing Western and capitalist values .
These groups , Gonzalez writes , often were created artificially , fusing disparate ethnic groups of people into larger pan-ethnic identities .
He breaks down those efforts in several chapters , explaining how Hispanic , Asian-American , and , most recently , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been created to collectivize often radically disparate people into organized pressure groups of the aggrieved .
It ’ s important to note that the purpose of forging these groups is not actually to end racism as it has been traditionally defined or ensure equal rights under the law , but to promote “ equity.
” In fact , as many social justice warriors and the so-called anti-racists acknowledge , discrimination is often essential to promoting equity as long as the discrimination is aimed at oppressor groups .
Identity politics does not just extend @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sex and gender categories as well , all united in opposition to a common oppressor group : straight , white males .
To a large extent , that ’ s what distinguishes the identity politics of today from the ethnic group and machine politics of earlier times .
Certain identities are ascribed levels of moral value based on where they fit on the hierarchy of oppression .
So , where does this all lead ?
Gonzalez writes : Venezuela and other parts of Latin America are the messes they are today not just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Gramsci refined Marxism and created ideological vectors through which entire societies could be clandestinely infected with Marxist pathologies .
America will head down a similar dysfunctional path if the identitarian ethos continues to hold sway .
It bodes ill for American unity and constitutional government .
Identity politics , by its very nature , is concerned with the interests of specific , designated groups , and not with the larger polity .
But constitutional republicanism can exist only through the active participation of a united people working within the confines of the nation-state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ together to agree on principles .
It ’ s clear that if the identity politics of today continues to replace the concept of “ e pluribus unum , ” America will cease to be one nation under God and become endless warring “ nations ” divided and clawing away at the fabric of a hopelessly fractured and increasingly hateful society .
That in essence is the dire warning of “ The Plot to Change America , ” a process happening literally before our eyes during our summer of protests and riots .
Gonzalez @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are to have any hope of stemming the tide of identity politics .
First , there must be a revival of civics and the inculcation of informed patriotism in young Americans in our homes and schools .
“ Americans must wage a crusade for classrooms to teach the content that will help children grow into confident , knowledgeable adults , ” Gonzalez wrties .
“ The conundrum is that we have to fight for shared national knowledge , for a sense of civics that unites us from coast to coast , in 13,600 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ advocating for a national curriculum or relying on the federal government.
” That would rely in part on battling back against the disinformation of radical historians such as Howard Zinn and efforts such as The New York Times ’ 1619 Project , already being used by school districts around the country , which portrays America as a hopelessly racist society founded on slavery .
Americans also can take action against the intentional , top-down enforcement of the re-tribalization of America .
If Americans are to work toward “ elimination of categories , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the grievance mongering , the public must become aware of what has happened and get involved , ” Gonzalez writes , adding : Our political leaders at the federal , state , and local levels simply won ’ t get there by themselves .
It is not that they lack the courage , but that the incentives are not there at the moment for them to do the right thing .

America always has been a dynamic country of constant change, with its people looking ahead.
by Jarrett Stepman
But an elite-driven ethos, which has become the dominant ideology of the country’s most powerful institutions, threatens to overwhelm the ideas and traits that made America what it is.
In his new book “The Plot to Change America: How Identity Politics is Dividing the Land of the Free,” my colleague, Mike Gonzalez, explains how reason, objectivity, and traditional patriotism are being undermined by left-wing ideology and ascendant group identity.
In the past decade, we’ve seen a remarkable upsurge in “wokeness,” and it’s no longer confined to radical corners of college campuses.
James Lindsay, co-author of a forthcoming book, “Cynical Theories: How Activist Scholarship Made Everything About Race, Gender, and Identity — and Why This Harms Everybody,” succinctly explained what “wokeness” means at a recent Heritage Foundation panel discussion:
Wokeness is a fusion of the critical theory school of neo-Marxism, which is a form of identity politics, and radical activism that has a very particular worldview that separates the world into liberationists versus oppressors, or oppressed versus oppressors.
The glue and fuel of this radical change, as Gonzalez explains in his new book, is identity politics.
Identity politics is now everywhere. It’s embraced by Antifa and Black Lives Matter, as well as by corporate America, the media, and, of course, academia.
Gonzalez breaks down how the left adopted a radical form of identity politics, which is fulfilling its goal of radically transforming American society.
Importantly, he explains that this was not a grassroots movement, but one precipitated by an elite intellectual vanguard. He writes:
The fact is that, from the beginning, it has been — and continues to be — an elite project.
For too long, we have accepted the fairy tale that America grew organically into the nation gripped by victimhood and identitarian division that it is today, that it is all the result of legitimate demands by minorities for recognition or restitution for past wrongs.
This intellectual project has roots in Marxism, but more specifically, in a series of thinkers in the early and mid-20th century.
Antonio Gramsci, an Italian Marxist thinker, theorized in the 1920s that communism had not really taken root in the West because the working classes had not been conditioned for it. He made the case for a kind of cultural Marxism that would ultimately transform Western societies.
Gonzalez explains how Gramsci’s ideas were absorbed by the German-based Frankfurt School of Critical Theory, and by its leading proponent in America, Herbert Marcuse.
Marcuse, who came to the United States in the 1930s, became a leading figure of the New Left and was an advocate of the radical college campus politics of the 1960s and 1970s.
Part of the strategy of Marcuse and left-wing activists was to mobilize various racial groups who would oppose prevailing Western and capitalist values.
These groups, Gonzalez writes, often were created artificially, fusing disparate ethnic groups of people into larger pan-ethnic identities.
He breaks down those efforts in several chapters, explaining how Hispanic, Asian-American, and, most recently, Middle East and North African identities have been created to collectivize often radically disparate people into organized pressure groups of the aggrieved.
It’s important to note that the purpose of forging these groups is not actually to end racism as it has been traditionally defined or ensure equal rights under the law, but to promote “equity.”
In fact, as many social justice warriors and the so-called anti-racists acknowledge, discrimination is often essential to promoting equity as long as the discrimination is aimed at oppressor groups.
Identity politics does not just extend to ethnic or racial groups, but sex and gender categories as well, all united in opposition to a common oppressor group: straight, white males.
To a large extent, that’s what distinguishes the identity politics of today from the ethnic group and machine politics of earlier times.
Certain identities are ascribed levels of moral value based on where they fit on the hierarchy of oppression.
So, where does this all lead? Gonzalez writes:
Venezuela and other parts of Latin America are the messes they are today not just because of Marxian socialism, but because Gramsci refined Marxism and created ideological vectors through which entire societies could be clandestinely infected with Marxist pathologies.
America will head down a similar dysfunctional path if the identitarian ethos continues to hold sway. It bodes ill for American unity and constitutional government.
Gonzalez writes:
Identity politics, by its very nature, is concerned with the interests of specific, designated groups, and not with the larger polity.
But constitutional republicanism can exist only through the active participation of a united people working within the confines of the nation-state, debating among themselves, but coming together to agree on principles.
It’s clear that if the identity politics of today continues to replace the concept of “e pluribus unum,” America will cease to be one nation under God and become endless warring “nations” divided and clawing away at the fabric of a hopelessly fractured and increasingly hateful society.
That in essence is the dire warning of “The Plot to Change America,” a process happening literally before our eyes during our summer of protests and riots.
Gonzalez lays out a path forward if we are to have any hope of stemming the tide of identity politics.
First, there must be a revival of civics and the inculcation of informed patriotism in young Americans in our homes and schools.
“Americans must wage a crusade for classrooms to teach the content that will help children grow into confident, knowledgeable adults,” Gonzalez wrties.
“The conundrum is that we have to fight for shared national knowledge, for a sense of civics that unites us from coast to coast, in 13,600 school districts across fifty states, without advocating for a national curriculum or relying on the federal government.”
That would rely in part on battling back against the disinformation of radical historians such as Howard Zinn and efforts such as The New York Times’ 1619 Project, already being used by school districts around the country, which portrays America as a hopelessly racist society founded on slavery.
Americans also can take action against the intentional, top-down enforcement of the re-tribalization of America.
If Americans are to work toward “elimination of categories, the culture of victimhood and expectations of benefits, the grievance mongering, the public must become aware of what has happened and get involved,” Gonzalez writes, adding:
Our political leaders at the federal, state, and local levels simply won’t get there by themselves. It is not that they lack the courage, but that the incentives are not there at the moment for them to do the right thing.


humansarefree--2020-08-21--240 Belgians Sue Bill Gates, Neil Ferguson, and the Belgian State Over Coronavirus Restrictions

Bill Gates , Belgium and a British epidemiologist are being taken to court by hundreds of Belgians who are against all coronavirus regulations and want to get them abolished .
Around 240 Belgians have joined a group called Viruswaanzin , which translates to ‘ viral madness ’ in Dutch and was launched by members of the restaurant and hospitality industry , according to their lawyer Michael Verstraeten .
Verstraeten told The Brussels Times that their aim was to get the Belgian government to revoke all coronavirus regulations , which they say trample on their freedoms and have done more harm @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ With no lockdown , there would have been fewer deaths , ” Verstraeten said .
“ You have no idea how many people are dying due to lockdown.
” On their website , the group regularly publishes posts challenging research and estimates which have driven coronavirus measures in Belgium and abroad .
“ We think that other measures are needed , measures which don ’ t limit the economy and the rights and freedoms of people , ” the lawyer said .
A central argument of the group is that data @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rates remains unclear and that lockdowns would ultimately cause more deaths because of the postponement of non-urgent medical procedures to bolster the Covid-19 response .
Through their civil suit , Viruswaanzin will argue that faulty prediction models were used by governments to make health policy decisions “ in a panic ” and will seek to obtain a penalty €10,000 per plaintiff for each day the measures remain in place .
“ If you take measures out of panic , you can make mistakes and end up with more deaths than if you had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said .
240 Belgians vs. Bill Gates , Neil Ferguson and the Belgian state A second , criminal complaint is also in the works and will target not only the Belgian state , but also Belgian virologists , and Microsoft CEO Bill Gates and British epidemiologist , Neil Ferguson .
The group are attacking Gates in court because of his status as a top contributor to the World Health Organisation ( WHO ) and over his various funding projects into coronavirus treatments and vaccines , while they are going after Ferguson — a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ until recently , to the UK government — for producing mortality and infection rates estimates which they say are “ completely wrong.
” Dr Ferguson , who stepped down from his role as a government advisor in May after he was reported to have broken lockdown rules , did not reply to a written request for comment .
Since its launch , Verstraeten said that hundreds of other people from across Belgium had rushed to become plaintiffs in the suit , despite the fact that their first attempt to get their case to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of research done by Dr Ferguson .
For their appearances in court , the plaintiffs have taken to wearing eye-catching plague doctor masks , which Verstraeten said aim to send the message that governments are “ pestering ” the population with regulations based on information that , to them , is at best uncertain , and at worst , flat out fake .
“ More and more people feel bad about these measures , they feel like they are in a completely different society — they don ’ t feel at home anymore @ @ @ @ @ @ @ some were even thinking of moving but did not know where .
“ There are a lot of conflicts , people are scared and bullied because they have another idea , a different opinion .
Scientists don ’ t get their articles published if they don ’ t match the views of the WHO.
” Verstraeten , who claimed he had contracted Covid-19 himself , repeatedly compared the coronavirus to the flu , and brushed off the high death rates of the ongoing pandemic as comparable to those of a “ severe flu @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” to say that the novel coronavirus was “ killer virus.
” Questioned about which sort of measures would be seen as appropriate by Viruswaanzin , Verstraeten said that a central demand was for the government to “ properly inform at-risk populations ” so that they could decide for themselves which measures to follow .
“ What we want is for them to support the health care sector , the hospitals and the health staff on the front lines , and to protect and properly inform at-risk populations , instead of taking general @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said .
After an opening hearing at the Brussels Court of Appeal on Tuesday , pleading for the case will debut on 14 October .
The arguments advanced by Viruswaanzin echo early assessments of the novel coronavirus — which has caused more than half a million deaths globally — as comparable or equal to the flu , including by Belgium ’ s own federal health minister , who referred to the coronavirus as “ a little flu ” just as the first wave of the epidemic hit Europe .
The group ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the resistance that has emerged in countries like the Netherlands or the US , where large swaths of the population have staged protests against the mandatory use of face masks or the closure of non-essential businesses to fight the spread of the virus behind the current pandemic .
The plaintiff ’ s lawsuit now comes as Belgium rushes to rein in emerging coronavirus clusters by imposing some of the strictest measures in Europe in what officials say are efforts to avoid a new country-wide lockdown .

Billy Boy, Belgium and a British epidemiologist are being taken to court by hundreds of Belgians who are against all coronavirus regulations and want to get them abolished.
by Gabriela Galindo
Around 240 Belgians have joined a group called Viruswaanzin, which translates to ‘viral madness’ in Dutch and was launched by members of the restaurant and hospitality industry, according to their lawyer Michael Verstraeten.
Verstraeten told The Brussels Times that their aim was to get the Belgian government to revoke all coronavirus regulations, which they say trample on their freedoms and have done more harm than good in the current health crisis.
“With no lockdown, there would have been fewer deaths,” Verstraeten said. “You have no idea how many people are dying due to lockdown.”
On their website, the group regularly publishes posts challenging research and estimates which have driven coronavirus measures in Belgium and abroad.
“We think that other measures are needed, measures which don’t limit the economy and the rights and freedoms of people,” the lawyer said.
A central argument of the group is that data on the impact of lockdowns on mortality rates remains unclear and that lockdowns would ultimately cause more deaths because of the postponement of non-urgent medical procedures to bolster the Covid-19 response.
Through their civil suit, Viruswaanzin will argue that faulty prediction models were used by governments to make health policy decisions “in a panic” and will seek to obtain a penalty €10,000 per plaintiff for each day the measures remain in place.
“If you take measures out of panic, you can make mistakes and end up with more deaths than if you had taken no measures,” the attorney said.
240 Belgians vs. Billy Boy, Neil Ferguson and the Belgian state
A second, criminal complaint is also in the works and will target not only the Belgian state, but also Belgian virologists, and Microsoft CEO Billy Boy and British epidemiologist, Neil Ferguson.
The group are attacking Gates in court because of his status as a top contributor to the World Health Organisation (WHO) and over his various funding projects into coronavirus treatments and jjabs, while they are going after Ferguson — a top advisor to the WHO and, until recently, to the UK government — for producing mortality and infection rates estimates which they say are “completely wrong.”
Dr Ferguson, who stepped down from his role as a government advisor in May after he was reported to have broken lockdown rules, did not reply to a written request for comment.
Since its launch, Verstraeten said that hundreds of other people from across Belgium had rushed to become plaintiffs in the suit, despite the fact that their first attempt to get their case to the courts was rejected on the basis of research done by Dr Ferguson.
Plagued Plaintiffs
For their appearances in court, the plaintiffs have taken to wearing eye-catching plague doctor masks, which Verstraeten said aim to send the message that governments are “pestering” the population with regulations based on information that, to them, is at best uncertain, and at worst, flat out fake.
“More and more people feel bad about these measures, they feel like they are in a completely different society — they don’t feel at home anymore,” he said, adding that some were even thinking of moving but did not know where.
“There are a lot of conflicts, people are scared and bullied because they have another idea, a different opinion. Scientists don’t get their articles published if they don’t match the views of the WHO.”
Verstraeten, who claimed he had contracted Covid-19 himself, repeatedly compared the coronavirus to the flu, and brushed off the high death rates of the ongoing pandemic as comparable to those of a “severe flu” saying it was “complete nonsense” to say that the novel coronavirus was “killer virus.”
Questioned about which sort of measures would be seen as appropriate by Viruswaanzin, Verstraeten said that a central demand was for the government to “properly inform at-risk populations” so that they could decide for themselves which measures to follow.
“What we want is for them to support the health care sector, the hospitals and the health staff on the front lines, and to protect and properly inform at-risk populations, instead of taking general measures applicable to everybody,” he said.
After an opening hearing at the Brussels Court of Appeal on Tuesday, pleading for the case will debut on 14 October.
The arguments advanced by Viruswaanzin echo early assessments of the novel coronavirus — which has caused more than half a million deaths globally — as comparable or equal to the flu, including by Belgium’s own federal health minister, who referred to the coronavirus as “a little flu” just as the first wave of the epidemic hit Europe.
The group’s rejection of the containment measure is akin to the resistance that has emerged in countries like the Netherlands or the US, where large swaths of the population have staged protests against the mandatory use of face masks or the closure of non-essential businesses to fight the spread of the virus behind the current pandemic.
The plaintiff’s lawsuit now comes as Belgium rushes to rein in emerging coronavirus clusters by imposing some of the strictest measures in Europe in what officials say are efforts to avoid a new country-wide lockdown.


humansarefree--2020-08-22--Nancy Pelosi: Killing Babies in Abortions ‘Unleashes the Power of Women’

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi praised Democrats for being the champions of abortion Wednesday during her speech at the Democratic National Convention .
For years , Pelosi has helped push the Democratic Party to adopt an increasingly radical pro-abortion agenda , one that calls for unrestricted abortions up to birth and taxpayer funding for them .
Earlier this year , she even led Democrats in blocking a measure to protect newborns from infanticide .
On Wednesday , the California congresswoman claimed Democrats are empowering women by advocating for abortion on demand , National Review reports .
“ We are unleashing the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ place in our national life by championing a woman ’ s right to choose and defending Roe v. Wade , ” she said .
“ Who ’ s standing in the way ?
Mitch McConnell and Donald Trump.
” If Democrats win the White House and the Senate , Pelosi promised that they will push to expand abortions across America .
“ We will increase our majority in the House .
We will win a Democratic majority in the Senate .
We will elect Kamala Harris vice president .
And we will elect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of America , ” Pelosi added .
But it ’ s really Pelosi and Democrat leaders who are standing in the way of progress .
They do not represent most Americans ’ views on abortion , including most women ’ s .
The U.S. is one of only seven countries in the world that allows elective abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy .
That ’ s not what Americans want , but Democrat leader are fighting to keep it that way .
Polls consistently show that Americans oppose abortion on demand and want @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2019 Harvard CAPS/Harris poll found that just 6 % of Americans said abortions should be allowed up until the birth of the child , while only 8 % said they should be permitted up to the third trimester .
Gallup polls show consistent support for pro-life laws as well .
In a July poll , Gallup found 55 % of Americans take a pro-life position on abortion wanting all ( 21 % ) or almost all 39 % abortions made illegal .
The poll found just 43 % of Americans take a pro-abortion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or almost all ( 14 % ) abortions legal .
Even more evidence comes from a June CBS News poll , which found the majority of Americans want more limits on abortion – the exact opposite of what Pelosi and Joe Biden are advocating for .
A Marist poll from January found six in 10 Americans ( 62 % ) say that if the Supreme Court revisits Roe v. Wade , it should allow states to determine restrictions ( 46 % ) or make abortion illegal ( 16 % ) .
Only 33 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should be interpreted to allow for legal abortion any time without restriction .
On the issue of taxpayer-funded elective abortions , Americans also strongly opposed .
Recent polls from Marist and Harvard University show that a majority of Americans oppose taxpayer-funded abortions .
Abortion is not about women ’ s empowerment , and most Americans know it .
Even most pro-choice voters are troubled by the idea of expanding abortions because they recognize that there is another human being involved , the woman ’ s own child .
Pro-life advocates and Republican leaders @ @ @ @ @ @ @ living human beings who deserve a right to life , and women ’ s empowerment can never be achieved by the “ choice ” to slaughter a child before they are born .

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi praised Democrats for being the champions of abortion Wednesday during her speech at the Democratic National Convention.
For years, Pelosi has helped push the Democratic Party to adopt an increasingly radical pro-abortion agenda, one that calls for unrestricted abortions up to birth and taxpayer funding for them.
Earlier this year, she even led Democrats in blocking a measure to protect newborns from infanticide.
On Wednesday, the California congresswoman claimed Democrats are empowering women by advocating for abortion on demand, National Review reports.
“We are unleashing the power of women to take our rightful place in our national life by championing a woman’s right to choose and defending Roe v. Wade,” she said. “Who’s standing in the way? Mitch McConnell and Donald Trump.”
If Democrats win the White House and the Senate, Pelosi promised that they will push to expand abortions across America.
“We will increase our majority in the House. We will win a Democratic majority in the Senate. We will elect Kamala Harris vice president. And we will elect Joe Biden president of the United States of America,” Pelosi added.
But it’s really Pelosi and Democrat leaders who are standing in the way of progress. They do not represent most Americans’ views on abortion, including most women’s.
The U.S. is one of only seven countries in the world that allows elective abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy. That’s not what Americans want, but Democrat leader are fighting to keep it that way.
Former High Ranking Satanist: “I Performed Satanic Rituals Inside Abortion Clinics”
Polls consistently show that Americans oppose abortion on demand and want laws that protect unborn babies. A 2019 Harvard CAPS/Harris poll found that just 6% of Americans said abortions should be allowed up until the birth of the child, while only 8% said they should be permitted up to the third trimester.
Gallup polls show consistent support for pro-life laws as well. In a July poll, Gallup found 55% of Americans take a pro-life position on abortion wanting all (21%) or almost all 39% abortions made illegal. The poll found just 43% of Americans take a pro-abortion position wanting all (29%) or almost all (14%) abortions legal.
Even more evidence comes from a June CBS News poll, which found the majority of Americans want more limits on abortion – the exact opposite of what Pelosi and Joe Biden are advocating for.
A Marist poll from January found six in 10 Americans (62%) say that if the Supreme Court revisits Roe v. Wade, it should allow states to determine restrictions (46%) or make abortion illegal (16%). Only 33% of Americans say Roe v. Wade should be interpreted to allow for legal abortion any time without restriction.
On the issue of taxpayer-funded elective abortions, Americans also strongly opposed. Recent polls from Marist and Harvard University show that a majority of Americans oppose taxpayer-funded abortions.
Abortion is not about women’s empowerment, and most Americans know it. Even most pro-choice voters are troubled by the idea of expanding abortions because they recognize that there is another human being involved, the woman’s own child.
Pro-life advocates and Republican leaders recognize that unborn babies are unique, living human beings who deserve a right to life, and women’s empowerment can never be achieved by the “choice” to slaughter a child before they are born.
Source: LifeNews.com


humansarefree--2020-08-22--The Case For Lockdowns, Masks, School Closures, ‘Distancing’ Has Just Collapsed

The whole narrative is falling apart .
New studies every day are proving beyond a doubt that the measures taken @ @ @ @ @ exceptions – to “ fight ” what they claimed was a “ new ” coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ slow or stop the disease , they have been counterproductive .
It turns out that @ @ @ @ @ , that patients have been successfully treated with T-cells from asymptomatic test-positive cases , and @ @ @ @ @ outside the family setting .
What are the authoritarians going to do when it is @ @ @ @ @ this information hidden ?
How will they keep people shut down .
Plus today : @ @ @ @ @ of corona-tyranny , big party in Wuhan , they are still cooking the books , @ @ @ @ @ Today on the Liberty Report :

The whole narrative is falling apart.
New studies every day are proving beyond a doubt that the measures taken worldwide – with a few exceptions – to “fight” what they claimed was a “new” coronavirus have not only failed to slow or stop the disease, they have been counterproductive.
It turns out that people develop lasting T-cell immunities, that patients have been successfully treated with T-cells from asymptomatic test-positive cases, and that the virus rarely spreads outside the family setting.
What are the authoritarians going to do when it is no longer possible to keep this information hidden? How will they keep people shut down.
Plus today: Utah shows a way out of corona-tyranny, big party in Wuhan, they are still cooking the books, and…enemy of the week! Today on the Liberty Report:
Source: Ron Paul Liberty Report


humansarefree--2020-08-22--Thousands Cram into Wuhan Water Park for Music Festival

Thousands of festival-goers crammed into a water park over the weekend in Wuhan — the central Chinese city where the Wuhan coronavirus first emerged last year — as local Chinese Communist Party ( CCP ) officials say they are once again easing coronavirus restrictions in the city .
The Wuhan Maya Beach Water Park reopened in June as part of Wuhan ’ s gradual reopening following its latest 76-day coronavirus lockdown meant to control the spread of coronavirus , Agence France-Presse ( AFP ) reports .
Wuhan , the capital of Hubei province , is notorious for having endured one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and draconian lockdowns at the hands of the CCP during the height of its coronavirus outbreak months ago .
Now , CCP authorities claim that Wuhan ’ s most recent coronavirus lockdown is reportedly easing and that the city ’ s water park hosted thousands of attendees over the weekend for an electronic music festival .
Local media said that the park “ capped attendance at 50 percent of normal capacity ” to comply with remaining coronavirus prevention protocols , presumably to encourage physical distancing .
However , AFP describes the thousands-strong festival @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Some of the crowd had donned life jackets , but none of the tightly-packed partygoers were seen to be wearing face masks as a DJ in bright yellow headphones played on stage , ” AFP notes .
Back during the lockdown : Watch Wuhan Residents Shouting “ It ’ s All Fake ” From Their Apartment Windows During Official Visit

Thousands of festival-goers crammed into a water park over the weekend in Wuhan — the central Chinese city where the Wuhan coronavirus first emerged last year — as local Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials say they are once again easing coronavirus restrictions in the city.
by Gabrielle Reyes (excerpt)
The Wuhan Maya Beach Water Park reopened in June as part of Wuhan’s gradual reopening following its latest 76-day coronavirus lockdown meant to control the spread of coronavirus, Agence France-Presse (AFP) reports.
Wuhan, the capital of Hubei province, is notorious for having endured one of the world’s most extensive and draconian lockdowns at the hands of the CCP during the height of its coronavirus outbreak months ago.
Now, CCP authorities claim that Wuhan’s most recent coronavirus lockdown is reportedly easing and that the city’s water park hosted thousands of attendees over the weekend for an electronic music festival.
Local media said that the park “capped attendance at 50 percent of normal capacity” to comply with remaining coronavirus prevention protocols, presumably to encourage physical distancing.
However, AFP describes the thousands-strong festival crowd as “packed close.”
“Some of the crowd had donned life jackets, but none of the tightly-packed partygoers were seen to be wearing face masks as a DJ in bright yellow headphones played on stage,” AFP notes.
Back during the lockdown: Watch Wuhan Residents Shouting “It’s All Fake” From Their Apartment Windows During Official Visit


humansarefree--2020-08-22--Plandemic 2: Indoctornation (Documentary)

Guided by the meticulous work of Dr. David E. Martin , Plandemic II : Indoctornation , tracks a three decade-long @ @ @ @ @ to the key players behind the COVID 19 pandemic .
Plandemic II connects the dots @ @ @ @ @ , the medical industry , politics and the financial industry to unmask the major conflicts @ @ @ @ @ makers that are currently managing this crisis .
Consider this film to be a “ @ @ @ @ @ absolutely blow your mind and forever change your understanding of the total corruption of the @ @ @ @ @ the for-profit medical system .
In essence , a group of evil people built this @ @ @ @ @ the world so they could crush humanity and earn billions in profits .
Even more @ @ @ @ @ t the first time they ’ ve tried this .
You can watch the first @ @ @ @

Guided by the meticulous work of Dr. David E. Martin, Plandemic II: Indoctornation, tracks a three decade-long money trail that leads directly to the key players behind the COVID 19 pandemic.
Plandemic II connects the dots between all forms of media, the medical industry, politics and the financial industry to unmask the major conflicts of interests with the decision makers that are currently managing this crisis.
Consider this film to be a “must-see” documentary that will absolutely blow your mind and forever change your understanding of the total corruption of the “science” establishment and the for-profit medical system.
In essence, a group of evil people built this virus and released it onto the world so they could crush humanity and earn billions in profits. Even more shockingly, this isn’t the first time they’ve tried this.

You can watch the first Plandemic documentary here.


humansarefree--2020-08-22--Nurse Speaks Out, Empty Beds, and no Coronovirus Cases in Devon Hospitals UK

My talk this week with a Nurse in Devon UK who tells me there are no # Coronavirus # Covid19 @ @ @ @ @ big hospitals in Devon UK , yet there are still empty beds and people dying @ @ @ @ @ speaks of nurses having heart and breathing problems from compulsory face masks .
Watch also @ @ @ @ @ s Parliament Broke Into Hospital That Claimed To Have 5,000 Infected & 200 Dead From @ @ @ @ @ EMPTY Do you remember this story from April ?
Sign That Says ‘ Hospital Disaster @ @ @ @ @ While Citizens Walk Into EMPTY Hospitals And Testing Centers ( MSM Says They Are Overwhelmed @

My talk this week with a Nurse in Devon UK who tells me there are no #Coronavirus #Covid19 cases in any of the big hospitals in Devon UK, yet there are still empty beds and people dying without treatment.
She also speaks of nurses having heart and breathing problems from compulsory face masks.
Watch also: Members Of Brazil’s Parliament Broke Into Hospital That Claimed To Have 5,000 Infected & 200 Dead From COVID19 – The Hospital Was EMPTY
Do you remember this story from April? Sign That Says ‘Hospital Disaster Drill In Progress’, While Citizens Walk Into EMPTY Hospitals And Testing Centers (MSM Says They Are Overwhelmed)
Source: Jason Liosatos Outside The Box


humansarefree--2020-08-23--Humiliation: Service Industry Workers in Maine Now Have to Wear DOG CONES

Janet Mills , the trans-looking governor of Maine , is demanding new protocols for service industry workers throughout the state that now require them to wear dog cones around their necks while handling food at restaurants .
If a server decides that he or she does not want to wear a face muzzle due to heat exhaustion and oxygen deprivation , then he or she will now be forced to slap on an inverted face shield , just like animals that have recently been spayed or neutered .
“ It is acceptable for kitchen staff to wear face shields in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ weather is warm , ” the guidelines explain .
“ Front-of-house staff may wear a face shield in lieu of a face covering only if the shield is designed to be worn inverted , attaching below the face ( e.g .
as a collar ) and open at the top of the shield , with the shield extending above the eyes and laterally to the ears.
” The guidelines go on to explain that other types of face shields , including those that are “ open at the bottom , directing breath downward @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coverings for front-of-house staff.
” This latest humiliation ritual is of course being blamed on the “ threat ” of the “ Woo-woo virus , ” for which there are a mere handful of “ cases ” in the states – about 36 total – and no deaths .
“ They can borrow the ones my dogs used when they got fixed , ” wrote one Twitter user , jokingly yet soberly .
“ This is a crime.
” Mills , who again looks like some sort of hideous , androgynous chimera , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decree , which she issued supposedly in response to the widespread fear still present throughout the United States over a phony plandemic that , at this point , represents little more than Munchausen syndrome by proxy among mostly Democrats .
“ Gov Janet Mills says servers must now wear face shields upside down so that their breath is directed up , not down , ” noted Dr. Sherri Tenpenny , an outspoken critic of the plandemic and all of the insanity that is coming down the pike in response to it .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dog cone… Peak insanity .
I wish this was a joke.
” Mills , who is not a scientist , is apparently unaware of a little thing called Newton ’ s Third Law of Motion , which dictates that for every action , there is an equal and opposite reaction .
Either that or she simply gets some kind of sadistic pleasure of out humiliating already strained service workers by treating them like animals .
“ Do they ever actually show the science or are we supposed to just trust them when they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one Twitter user , referring to Mills ’ “ COVID19 Prevention Checklist Industry Guidance ” which states : “ The State of Maine has adopted a staged approach , supported by science , public health expertise , and industry collaboration , to allow Maine businesses to safely open when the time is right.
” There would seem to be nothing scientific about any of this , and especially not with upside-down dog cones that while perhaps directing some droplets upwards are still subject to the natural laws of physics , meaning those same @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the ground .
One wonders when , if ever , Americans are going to finally awaken from their stupor and put an end to this insanity .
How much more ridiculous and tyrannical do things need to get before We the People join together and say enough is enough ?
“ Wait till the lawsuits come in for when one of the servers trips and cracks their heads because they can ’ t see anything below shoulder height , ” wrote another Twitter user .

Janet Mills, the trans-looking governor of Maine, is demanding new protocols for service industry workers throughout the state that now require them to wear dog cones around their necks while handling food at restaurants.
If a server decides that he or she does not want to wear a face muzzle due to heat exhaustion and oxygen deprivation, then he or she will now be forced to slap on an inverted face shield, just like animals that have recently been spayed or neutered.
“It is acceptable for kitchen staff to wear face shields in lieu of masks when the kitchen or weather is warm,” the guidelines explain.
“Front-of-house staff may wear a face shield in lieu of a face covering only if the shield is designed to be worn inverted, attaching below the face (e.g. as a collar) and open at the top of the shield, with the shield extending above the eyes and laterally to the ears.”
The guidelines go on to explain that other types of face shields, including those that are “open at the bottom, directing breath downward, are not acceptable replacements for face coverings for front-of-house staff.”
This latest humiliation ritual is of course being blamed on the “threat” of the “Woo-woo virus,” for which there are a mere handful of “cases” in the states – about 36 total – and no deaths.
“They can borrow the ones my dogs used when they got fixed,” wrote one Twitter user, jokingly yet soberly. “This is a crime.”
Peak insanity
Mills, who again looks like some sort of hideous, androgynous chimera, is directly to blame for the new decree, which she issued supposedly in response to the widespread fear still present throughout the United States over a phony plandemic that, at this point, represents little more than Munchausen syndrome by proxy among mostly Democrats.
“Gov Janet Mills says servers must now wear face shields upside down so that their breath is directed up, not down,” noted Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, an outspoken critic of the plandemic and all of the insanity that is coming down the pike in response to it.
“Yes she wants you to wear a dog cone… Peak insanity. I wish this was a joke.”
Mills, who is not a scientist, is apparently unaware of a little thing called Newton’s Third Law of Motion, which dictates that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
Either that or she simply gets some kind of sadistic pleasure of out humiliating already strained service workers by treating them like animals.
“Do they ever actually show the science or are we supposed to just trust them when they proclaim ‘Science!’” asked one Twitter user, referring to Mills’ “COVID19 Prevention Checklist Industry Guidance” which states:
“The State of Maine has adopted a staged approach, supported by science, public health expertise, and industry collaboration, to allow Maine businesses to safely open when the time is right.”
There would seem to be nothing scientific about any of this, and especially not with upside-down dog cones that while perhaps directing some droplets upwards are still subject to the natural laws of physics, meaning those same droplets eventually have to come back down to the ground.
One wonders when, if ever, Americans are going to finally awaken from their stupor and put an end to this insanity. How much more ridiculous and tyrannical do things need to get before We the People join together and say enough is enough?
“Wait till the lawsuits come in for when one of the servers trips and cracks their heads because they can’t see anything below shoulder height,” wrote another Twitter user.
Reference: Clearnewswire.com