humansarefree--2020-09-11--Coronavirus Policy Has Been Hurting, Not Helping, Older and Less Healthy People

At first , coronavirus was sold as a very dangerous disease for everyone .
Some people still believe that line , but the facts were clear months ago that for healthy , younger individuals the risk of severe illness or death from coronavirus is very low [ 0.01 % to be precise ] .
And the risk diminishes the younger one is , with children being at nearly zero risk of death and tending to have no to minor symptoms if infected .
As these facts have become more generally known , politicians and media have shifted the emphasis in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of coronavirus crackdowns .
They have talked more about the need to protect older and less healthy individuals from coronavirus .
Yet , overall , it seems like the fearmongering and governments ’ coronavirus policies have brought more harm than help to these higher-risk individuals .
Especially early on some hospitals seemed to put coronavirus patients — often elderly individuals who already had major health problems — on care protocols that amounted to conveyer belts to death .
These protocols were encouraged by policies including extra government payments that kicked in as patients @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and were connected to ventilators .
There was no similar government encouragement for pursuing less extreme and often more successful treatment options .
While in hospitals , many of these coronavirus patients were also prohibited from being visited by friends and family .
Such visits can improve health by bringing joy and comfort during a stressful situation .
Also , friends and family , even if they have little medical knowledge , can apply common sense to act as effective advocates for the improved treatment of patients .
Even visitors bringing a patient @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wonders .
It is amazing how terrible the food can be at expensive hospitals that are supposedly centered on bringing people to better health .
Hospitals can also just ignore patients ’ food requests such as by repeatedly giving nonvegetarian food to a vegetarian .
Over at nursing homes , residents have similarly been deprived of visits from friends and family as part of protocols supposedly instituted because of coronavirus .
These missed visits could have lifted the residents ’ spirits while allowing outsiders to judge if living conditions are satisfactory .
While @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coronavirus infection , some governments required the transfer of coronavirus patients from hospitals to nursing homes .
A big disservice to older and less healthy individuals has been the effort to “ flatten the curve ” for coronavirus through actions including mandating “ social distancing , ” restricting travel , and closing down businesses , religious gatherings , and schools .
Slowing the spread of the virus , to the extent it is successful , extends the time for which people who are more threatened by coronavirus are at higher risk from infection @ @ @ @ @ @ @ immunity .
The United States government has been spending and the Federal Reserve has been printing trillions of dollars in an effort supposedly purposed to mitigate the economic damage from coronavirus crackdowns .
In contrast , just allowing coronavirus to spread more quickly while people most at risk of major harm isolate themselves , if they choose , would minimize economic trouble and sooner allow older and less healthy people to relatively safely take part in normal activity when herd immunity develops .
If governments could not resist implementing big expensive responses to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of pushing isolation , hosted “ coronavirus parties ” where younger , healthier people would be encouraged to mingle in close quarters to speed the spread of the virus .
Absurdly , six months into the coronavirus crackdowns in America , the exact opposite is being done .
For example , many college campuses at which most students would be at very low risk of major problems from coronavirus are remaining closed or are reopening with draconian prohibitions on students being close to each other .
Like other individuals , older and less @ @ @ @ @ @ @ restrictions on liberty that have been imposed in the name of countering coronavirus .
Instead of people just having , as always , the option to limit their activities to seek to avoid infection , mandates have been imposed seeking to force such behavior .
Like many younger and healthier people , many of the people in groups more susceptible to harm from coronavirus would prefer to continue to live life as normal .
Others would like to choose their own level of restraint .
While people in government and media pat themselves @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of civilization to protect older and less healthy people , many of the supposed prime beneficiaries of these actions are angry that much of the joy in life has been shut off by no-good “ do-gooders.
” Mask mandates imposed in the name of countering coronavirus can be particularly burdensome and harmful for older and less healthy individuals .
For someone who already has breathing trouble , putting on a mask compounds the problem .
Plus , masks trapping filth right at a person ’ s mouth and nose is a recipe for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ already have weakened immune systems .
To boot , masks provide no net protection from coronavirus .
Mask mandates are psychological operations masquerading as science-based policy .
Little mentioned is the fact that among so-called essential workers are many older and less healthy individuals who throughout the coronavirus crackdown have continued to show up at work .
Many of their jobs even call for frequent and rather close contact with other individuals .
Workers at grocery stores that have seen much more traffic during the coronavirus crackdown , for example , have had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Many of these higher risk workers have also been required to wear masks while on the job .
Maybe these older and less healthy essential workers are little mentioned because the coronavirus crackdowns are more about bossing people around on a grand scale than about actually trying to protect people ’ s health .
That would also explain why governments have mandated that businesses shut , that people stay home , and that people stay six feet apart and wear masks in the name of countering coronavirus but do not say anything about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ through actions such as taking vitamins and improving their diets .
While coronavirus crackdowns are supposedly purposed to help older and less healthy people avoid coronavirus infection , the crackdowns have caused many of these same individuals ’ health to deteriorate .
Restrictions including social distancing , stay at home orders , and travel limitations have increased the isolation of many of these individuals from friends and family .
This isolation is unhealthy , preventing positive interactions that can enhance health .
It also cuts off friends and family from discovering health dangers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ assisting them in dealing with such .
The widespread shutdown of much of healthcare operations during the coronavirus crackdown also hit older and less healthy people hard .
They were deprived of medical visits where health problems could be uncovered .
This has resulted in delaying treatment , sometimes to the extent that a problem ceases to be treatable .
Also , scheduled surgeries and other treatments were canceled due to coronavirus decrees , leading to worsened health in many instances .
It is important to remember that not all health care is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or drug .
The closing of gyms left many older and less healthy individuals without their trusted means of ensuring they stay physically fit .
With restaurants , movie theaters , sports stadiums , symphony halls , and many other venues shuttered , avenues for helping stay mentally fit have also been very much curtailed .
Like individuals generally , older and less healthy individuals often have a focus on maintaining and improving their financial situation .
They are among the small business owners whose businesses have been devastated by the coronavirus crackdowns @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with shutdowns and restrictions on operations and the owner can be put in terrible financial shape .
Small businesses have ongoing expenses that must be paid even when they do not operate .
Owners may have little savings — savings often intended for retirement — to pay personal expenses when business profits disappear .
Mortgage and rent payments can be difficult or impossible to pay .
Economic devastation wrought by coronavirus crackdowns , of course , can also lead to negative health consequences .
Older and less healthy people also want to enjoy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about , visiting with people , taking advantage of what goods , services , and entertainment businesses have to offer .
Even if fearmongering and government mandates were to succeed in reducing coronavirus risks taken by some older and less healthy people , many of them would prefer to take on greater risk if that means they can keep living life normally .
It should be kept in mind that the health risk from coronavirus for even older and less healthy people is often overblown .
Coronavirus is frequently promoted as the cause @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and long-term comorbidities .
In many of these instances , “ coronavirus deaths ” would be better understood as “ deaths with coronavirus ” than as “ deaths caused by coronavirus.
” Further , when coronavirus contributes to a death along with comorbidities , it can do so by just pushing the date of an impending death forward by days , weeks , or months .
Various other infections can do the same .
Coronavirus fearmongering and crackdowns have also meant that for many older and less healthy individuals the bucket list — @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like to do before he dies — has kicked the bucket .
Consider a person who during the coronavirus crackdowns was told by his doctor that he has six months to live .
His bucket list may have included taking a trip abroad to visit a historical site or natural wonder , watching a Broadway play , and seeing his grandchild play in a school sports competition .
Too bad none of this would likely be doable .
Restrictions and delays have been imposed on passport applications .
Much travel internationally and interstate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ including mandatory quarantines .
Live events from Broadway plays to local improv troop shows are shut down .
Many schools have been “ virtual ” only .
Even an older or less healthy person who would choose to hole up in his home for months on end and who would on his own initiative take every action mandated in coronavirus crackdowns because he thinks it is the best course is harmed by the crackdowns .
He is harmed by the damage imposed on the economy .
He is harmed , if he exercises @ @ @ @ @ @ @ destruction and restraints on liberty imposed on others .
The coronavirus fearmongering and crackdowns have devastated the economy and liberty .
While governments claim such devastation is merited to protect older and less healthy individuals , that claim is false .
These individuals , like younger and healthier individuals , are victims — not beneficiaries — of the fearmongering and crackdowns .

At first, coronavirus was sold as a very dangerous disease for everyone. Some people still believe that line, but the facts were clear months ago that for healthy, younger individuals the risk of severe illness or death from coronavirus is very low [0.01% to be precise].
And the risk diminishes the younger one is, with children being at nearly zero risk of death and tending to have no to minor symptoms if infected.
As these facts have become more generally known, politicians and media have shifted the emphasis in their promotion of fear and the continuation of coronavirus crackdowns.
They have talked more about the need to protect older and less healthy individuals from coronavirus.
Yet, overall, it seems like the fearmongering and governments’ coronavirus policies have brought more harm than help to these higher-risk individuals.
Especially early on some hospitals seemed to put coronavirus patients — often elderly individuals who already had major health problems — on care protocols that amounted to conveyer belts to death.
These protocols were encouraged by policies including extra government payments that kicked in as patients moved to more intensive care in hospitals and were connected to ventilators.
There was no similar government encouragement for pursuing less extreme and often more successful treatment options.
While in hospitals, many of these coronavirus patients were also prohibited from being visited by friends and family. Such visits can improve health by bringing joy and comfort during a stressful situation.
Also, friends and family, even if they have little medical knowledge, can apply common sense to act as effective advocates for the improved treatment of patients.
Even visitors bringing a patient a tasty, nutritious meal can do wonders.
It is amazing how terrible the food can be at expensive hospitals that are supposedly centered on bringing people to better health.
Hospitals can also just ignore patients’ food requests such as by repeatedly giving nonvegetarian food to a vegetarian.
Over at nursing homes, residents have similarly been deprived of visits from friends and family as part of protocols supposedly instituted because of coronavirus.
These missed visits could have lifted the residents’ spirits while allowing outsiders to judge if living conditions are satisfactory.
While visitors were prohibited to supposedly protect against coronavirus infection, some governments required the transfer of coronavirus patients from hospitals to nursing homes.
A big disservice to older and less healthy individuals has been the effort to “flatten the curve” for coronavirus through actions including mandating “social distancing,” restricting travel, and closing down businesses, religious gatherings, and schools.
Slowing the spread of the virus, to the extent it is successful, extends the time for which people who are more threatened by coronavirus are at higher risk from infection. It does so by delaying herd immunity.
The United States government has been spending and the Federal Reserve has been printing trillions of dollars in an effort supposedly purposed to mitigate the economic damage from coronavirus crackdowns.
In contrast, just allowing coronavirus to spread more quickly while people most at risk of major harm isolate themselves, if they choose, would minimize economic trouble and sooner allow older and less healthy people to relatively safely take part in normal activity when herd immunity develops.
If governments could not resist implementing big expensive responses to coronavirus, they could have, instead of pushing isolation, hosted “coronavirus parties” where younger, healthier people would be encouraged to mingle in close quarters to speed the spread of the virus.
Absurdly, six months into the coronavirus crackdowns in America, the exact opposite is being done.
For example, many college campuses at which most students would be at very low risk of major problems from coronavirus are remaining closed or are reopening with draconian prohibitions on students being close to each other.
Like other individuals, older and less healthy people have suffered under the extreme restrictions on liberty that have been imposed in the name of countering coronavirus.
Instead of people just having, as always, the option to limit their activities to seek to avoid infection, mandates have been imposed seeking to force such behavior.
Like many younger and healthier people, many of the people in groups more susceptible to harm from coronavirus would prefer to continue to live life as normal. Others would like to choose their own level of restraint.
While people in government and media pat themselves on their backs for shutting down much of civilization to protect older and less healthy people, many of the supposed prime beneficiaries of these actions are angry that much of the joy in life has been shut off by no-good “do-gooders.”
Mask mandates imposed in the name of countering coronavirus can be particularly burdensome and harmful for older and less healthy individuals.
For someone who already has breathing trouble, putting on a mask compounds the problem. Plus, masks trapping filth right at a person’s mouth and nose is a recipe for inducing sickness, especially for people who already have weakened immune systems.
To boot, masks provide no net protection from coronavirus. Mask mandates are psychological operations masquerading as science-based policy.
Little mentioned is the fact that among so-called essential workers are many older and less healthy individuals who throughout the coronavirus crackdown have continued to show up at work.
Many of their jobs even call for frequent and rather close contact with other individuals.
Workers at grocery stores that have seen much more traffic during the coronavirus crackdown, for example, have had an increase in such on-the-job interactions.
Many of these higher risk workers have also been required to wear masks while on the job.
Maybe these older and less healthy essential workers are little mentioned because the coronavirus crackdowns are more about bossing people around on a grand scale than about actually trying to protect people’s health.
That would also explain why governments have mandated that businesses shut, that people stay home, and that people stay six feet apart and wear masks in the name of countering coronavirus but do not say anything about how people can help themselves gain protection through actions such as taking vitamins and improving their diets.
While coronavirus crackdowns are supposedly purposed to help older and less healthy people avoid coronavirus infection, the crackdowns have caused many of these same individuals’ health to deteriorate.
Restrictions including social distancing, stay at home orders, and travel limitations have increased the isolation of many of these individuals from friends and family.
This isolation is unhealthy, preventing positive interactions that can enhance health. It also cuts off friends and family from discovering health dangers of older and less healthy people and assisting them in dealing with such.
The widespread shutdown of much of healthcare operations during the coronavirus crackdown also hit older and less healthy people hard.
They were deprived of medical visits where health problems could be uncovered. This has resulted in delaying treatment, sometimes to the extent that a problem ceases to be treatable.
Also, scheduled surgeries and other treatments were canceled due to coronavirus decrees, leading to worsened health in many instances.
It is important to remember that not all health care is provided by a doctor, nurse, or drug.
The closing of gyms left many older and less healthy individuals without their trusted means of ensuring they stay physically fit.
With restaurants, movie theaters, sports stadiums, symphony halls, and many other venues shuttered, avenues for helping stay mentally fit have also been very much curtailed.
Like individuals generally, older and less healthy individuals often have a focus on maintaining and improving their financial situation. They are among the small business owners whose businesses have been devastated by the coronavirus crackdowns.
Kill or significantly impair a business with shutdowns and restrictions on operations and the owner can be put in terrible financial shape. Small businesses have ongoing expenses that must be paid even when they do not operate.
Owners may have little savings — savings often intended for retirement — to pay personal expenses when business profits disappear. Mortgage and rent payments can be difficult or impossible to pay.
Economic devastation wrought by coronavirus crackdowns, of course, can also lead to negative health consequences.
Older and less healthy people also want to enjoy life. That includes being out and about, visiting with people, taking advantage of what goods, services, and entertainment businesses have to offer.
Even if fearmongering and government mandates were to succeed in reducing coronavirus risks taken by some older and less healthy people, many of them would prefer to take on greater risk if that means they can keep living life normally.
It should be kept in mind that the health risk from coronavirus for even older and less healthy people is often overblown.
Coronavirus is frequently promoted as the cause of death despite the presence of major and long-term comorbidities.
In many of these instances, “coronavirus deaths” would be better understood as “deaths with coronavirus” than as “deaths caused by coronavirus.”
Yet, government policy encourages the coronavirus attribution.
Further, when coronavirus contributes to a death along with comorbidities, it can do so by just pushing the date of an impending death forward by days, weeks, or months. Various other infections can do the same.
Coronavirus fearmongering and crackdowns have also meant that for many older and less healthy individuals the bucket list — a list of things a person would like to do before he dies — has kicked the bucket.
Consider a person who during the coronavirus crackdowns was told by his doctor that he has six months to live.
His bucket list may have included taking a trip abroad to visit a historical site or natural wonder, watching a Broadway play, and seeing his grandchild play in a school sports competition. Too bad none of this would likely be doable.
Restrictions and delays have been imposed on passport applications. Much travel internationally and interstate has been barred or subjected to restrictions including mandatory quarantines.
Live events from Broadway plays to local improv troop shows are shut down. Many schools have been “virtual” only.
Even an older or less healthy person who would choose to hole up in his home for months on end and who would on his own initiative take every action mandated in coronavirus crackdowns because he thinks it is the best course is harmed by the crackdowns.
He is harmed by the damage imposed on the economy. He is harmed, if he exercises some empathy, by seeing the economic destruction and restraints on liberty imposed on others.
The coronavirus fearmongering and crackdowns have devastated the economy and liberty. While governments claim such devastation is merited to protect older and less healthy individuals, that claim is false.
These individuals, like younger and healthier individuals, are victims — not beneficiaries — of the fearmongering and crackdowns.
Source & Copyright © 2020 by RonPaul Institute.


humansarefree--2020-09-11--9/11: From Terrorists to Viruses

9/11: From Terrorists to Viruses

For anyone old enough to have been alive and aware of the attacks of September 11 , 2001 and of so-called COVID-19 in 2020 , memory may serve to remind one of an eerie parallel between the two operations .
However , if memory has been expunged by the work of one ’ s forgettery or deleted by the corporate media ’ s flushing it down the memory hole , or if knowledge is lacking , or maybe fear or cognitive dissonance is blocking awareness , I would like to point out some similarities that might perk one up to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two operations .
The fundamental tie that binds them is that both events aroused the human fear of death .
Underlying all fears is the fear of death .
A fear that has both biological and cultural roots .
On the biological level , we all react to death threats in a fight or flight manner .
Culturally , there are multiple ways that fear can be allayed or exacerbated , purposely or not .
Usually , culture serves to ease the fear of death , which can traumatize people , through its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a long time served that purpose , but when religion loses its hold on people ’ s imaginations , especially in regard to the belief in immortality , as Orwell pointed out in the mid-1940s , a huge void is left .
Without that consolation , fear is usually tranquilized by trivial pursuits .
In the cases of the attacks of September 11 , 2001 and the current coronavirus operation , the fear of death has been used by the power elites in order to control populations and institute long-planned agendas .
There @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two events .
Both events were clearly anticipated and planned .
In the case of September 11 , 2001 , as I have argued before , linguistic mind-control was carefully crafted in advance to conjure fear at the deepest levels with the use of such repeated terms as Pearl Harbor , Homeland , Ground Zero , the Unthinkable , and 9/11 .
Each in its turn served to raise the fear level dramatically .
Each drew on past meetings , documents , events , speeches , and deep associations of dread .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s playbook , not from that of an apprentice out of control .
And as David Ray Griffin , the seminal 9/11 researcher ( and others ) , has pointed out in a dozen meticulously argued and documented books , the events of that day had to be carefully planned in advance , and the post hoc official explanations can only be described as scientific miracles , not scientific explanations .
• massive steel-framed high-rise buildings for the first time in history coming down without explosives or incendiaries in free fall speed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was not even hit by a plane • an alleged hijacker pilot , Hani Hanjour , who could barely fly a Piper Cub , flying a massive Boeing 757 in a most difficult manoeuvre into the Pentagon [ impossible manoeuvres according to a veteran pilot who flew the exact plane models for decades ] • airport security at four airports failing at the same moment on the same day The list goes on and on .
And all this controlled by [ CIA asset ] Osama bin Laden .
Then we had the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to 9/11 .
Graeme MacQueen , in The 2001 Anthrax Deception , brilliantly shows that these too were a domestic conspiracy .
These planned events led to the invasion of Afghanistan , the Patriot Act , the U.S. withdrawal from the ABM Treaty , the invasion of Iraq , the ongoing war on terror , etc .
Let us not forget years of those fraudulent color-coded warnings of the terrorist levels and the government admonition to use duct tape around your windows to protect against a massive chemical and biological attack .
Let @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are fresh in our minds .
As the COVID-19 lockdowns were underway , a funny thing happened as people were wishing that life could return to normal and they could be let out of their cages .
Similar color-coded designs popped up everywhere at the same time .
They showed the step-by-step schedule of possible loosening of government controls if things went according to plan .
Red to yellow to green .
Eye catching .
Red orange yellow blue green .
As with the terrorist warnings following September 11 , 2001 .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I live , it ’ s color chart ends in blue , not green , with Phase 4 blue termed “ the new normal : Development of vaccines and/or treatments enable the resumption of ‘ the new normal.
’ ” Interesting wording .
A resumption that takes us back to the future .
As with the duct tape admonitions after 9/11 , now everyone is advised to wear a mask .
It ’ s interesting to note that the 3M Company , a major seller of duct tape , is also one of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ face masks .
The company was expected to be producing 50 million N95 respirator masks per month by June 2020 and 2 billion globally within the coming year .
Then there is 3M ’ s masking tape… but this is a sticky topic .
After the attacks of September 11 , 2001 , we were told repeatedly that the world was changed forever .
Now we are told that after COVID-19 , life will never be the same .
This is the “ new normal , ” while the post-9/11-pre-Covid-19 world must have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ everything is different but normal also .
So as the Massachusetts government website puts it , in the days to come we may be enabled to enact “ the resumption of ‘ the new normal.
’ ” This new old normal will no doubt be a form of techno-fascist transhumanism enacted for our own good .
As with 9/11 , there is ample evidence that the coronavirus outbreak was expected and planned ; that people have been the victims of a propaganda campaign to use an invisible virus to scare us into submission @ @ @ @ @ @ @ economy for the global elites .
It is a clear case , as Peter Koenig tells Michel Chossudovsky in this must-see interview , that is not a conspiracy theory but a blatant factual plan spelled out in the 2010 Rockefeller Report , the October 18 , 2019 Event 201 , and Agenda 21 [ Reinvented as 2030 Agenda ] , among other places .
Like amorphous terrorists and a war against “ terrorism , ” which is a tactic and therefore not something you can fight , a virus is invisible except when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , orange-spiked bunch of floating weird balls that are everywhere and nowhere .
Watch your back , watch your face , mask up , wash your hands , keep your distance – you never know when those orange spiked balls may get you .
As with 9/11 , whenever anyone questions the official narrative of Covid-19 , the official statistics , the validity of the tests , the effectiveness of masks , the powers behind the heralded vaccine to come , and the horrible consequences of the lockdowns that are destroying economies , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and to commit suicide , creating traumatized children , bankrupting small and middle-sized businesses for the sake of enriching the richest , etc.
, the corporate media mock the dissidents as conspiracy nuts , aiding the viral enemy .
This is so even when the dissenters are highly respected doctors , scientists , intellectuals , et al.
, who are regularly disappeared from the internet .
With September 11 , there were initially far fewer dissenters than now , and so the censorship of opposing viewpoints didn ’ t need the blatant censorship @ @ @ @ @ @ @ censorship happens all across the internet now , quickly and stealthily , the same internet that is being forced on everyone as the new normal as presented in the Great Global Reset , the digital lie , where , as Anthony Fauci put it , no one should ever shake hands again .
A world of abstract images and beings in which , as Arthur Jensen tells Howard Beal in the film , Network , “ All necessities [ will be ] provided , all anxieties tranquilized , all boredom amused.
” A @ @ @ @ @ @ @ perhaps the end of that red thread that runs from 9/11 to today .
Heidi Evens and Thomas Hackett write in the New York Daily News : “ With the nation ’ s illusion of safety and security in ruins , Americans begin the slow and fitful process of healing from a trauma that feels deeply , cruelly personal [ … ] leaving citizens throughout the country with the frightening knowledge of their vulnerability.
” That was written on September 12 , 2001 .

by Edward Curtin
For anyone old enough to have been alive and aware of the attacks of September 11, 2001 and of so-called COVID-19 in 2020, memory may serve to remind one of an eerie parallel between the two operations.
However, if memory has been expunged by the work of one’s forgettery or deleted by the corporate media’s flushing it down the memory hole, or if knowledge is lacking, or maybe fear or cognitive dissonance is blocking awareness, I would like to point out some similarities that might perk one up to consider some parallels and connections between these two operations.
The fundamental tie that binds them is that both events aroused the human fear of death. Underlying all fears is the fear of death.
A fear that has both biological and cultural roots. On the biological level, we all react to death threats in a fight or flight manner.
Culturally, there are multiple ways that fear can be allayed or exacerbated, purposely or not. Usually, culture serves to ease the fear of death, which can traumatize people, through its symbols and myths.
Religion has for a long time served that purpose, but when religion loses its hold on people’s imaginations, especially in regard to the belief in immortality, as Orwell pointed out in the mid-1940s, a huge void is left.
Without that consolation, fear is usually tranquilized by trivial pursuits.
In the cases of the attacks of September 11, 2001 and the current coronavirus operation, the fear of death has been used by the power elites in order to control populations and institute long-planned agendas. There is a red thread that connects the two events.
Both events were clearly anticipated and planned.
In the case of September 11, 2001, as I have argued before, linguistic mind-control was carefully crafted in advance to conjure fear at the deepest levels with the use of such repeated terms as Pearl Harbor, Homeland, Ground Zero, the Unthinkable, and 9/11.
Each in its turn served to raise the fear level dramatically. Each drew on past meetings, documents, events, speeches, and deep associations of dread.
This language was conjured from the chief sorcerer’s playbook, not from that of an apprentice out of control.
And as David Ray Griffin, the seminal 9/11 researcher (and others), has pointed out in a dozen meticulously argued and documented books, the events of that day had to be carefully planned in advance, and the post hoc official explanations can only be described as scientific miracles, not scientific explanations.
These miracles include:
massive steel-framed high-rise buildings for the first time in history coming down without explosives or incendiaries in free fall speed; one of them being WTC-7 that was not even hit by a plane
an alleged hijacker pilot, Hani Hanjour, who could barely fly a Piper Cub, flying a massive Boeing 757 in a most difficult manoeuvre into the Pentagon [ impossible manoeuvres according to a veteran pilot who flew the exact plane models for decades]
manoeuvres according to a veteran pilot who flew the exact plane models for decades] airport security at four airports failing at the same moment on the same day
all sixteen US intelligence agencies failing + air traffic control failing.
The list goes on and on. And all this controlled by [CIA asset] Osama bin Laden.
It’s a fairy tale.
Then we had the crucially important anthrax attacks that are linked to 9/11. Graeme MacQueen, in The 2001 Anthrax Deception, brilliantly shows that these too were a domestic conspiracy.
These planned events led to the invasion of Afghanistan, the Patriot Act, the U.S. withdrawal from the ABM Treaty, the invasion of Iraq, the ongoing war on terror, etc.
Let us not forget years of those fraudulent color-coded warnings of the terrorist levels and the government admonition to use duct tape around your windows to protect against a massive chemical and biological attack.
Jump to 2020.
Let me start in reverse while color-coded designs are fresh in our minds.
As the COVID-19 lockdowns were underway, a funny thing happened as people were wishing that life could return to normal and they could be let out of their cages.
Similar color-coded designs popped up everywhere at the same time.
They showed the step-by-step schedule of possible loosening of government controls if things went according to plan.
Red to yellow to green. Eye catching. Red orange yellow blue green. As with the terrorist warnings following September 11, 2001.
In Massachusetts, a so-called blue state where I live, it’s color chart ends in blue, not green, with Phase 4 blue termed “the new normal: Development of jjabs and/or treatments enable the resumption of ‘the new normal.’”
Interesting wording. A resumption that takes us back to the future.
As with the duct tape admonitions after 9/11, now everyone is advised to wear a mask. It’s interesting to note that the 3M Company, a major seller of duct tape, is also one of the world’s major sellers of face masks.
The company was expected to be producing 50 million N95 respirator masks per month by June 2020 and 2 billion globally within the coming year. Then there is 3M’s masking tape… but this is a sticky topic.
After the attacks of September 11, 2001, we were told repeatedly that the world was changed forever. Now we are told that after COVID-19, life will never be the same.
This is the “new normal,” while the post-9/11-pre-Covid-19 world must have been the old new normal. So everything is different but normal also.
So as the Massachusetts government website puts it, in the days to come we may be enabled to enact “the resumption of ‘the new normal.’”
This new old normal will no doubt be a form of techno-fascist transhumanism enacted for our own good.
As with 9/11, there is ample evidence that the coronavirus outbreak was expected and planned; that people have been the victims of a propaganda campaign to use an invisible virus to scare us into submission and shut down the world’s economy for the global elites.
It is a clear case, as Peter Koenig tells Michel Chossudovsky in this must-see interview, that is not a conspiracy theory but a blatant factual plan spelled out in the 2010 Rockefeller Report, the October 18, 2019 Event 201, and Agenda 21 [Reinvented as 2030 Agenda], among other places.
Like amorphous terrorists and a war against “terrorism,” which is a tactic and therefore not something you can fight, a virus is invisible except when the media presents it as a pale, orange-spiked bunch of floating weird balls that are everywhere and nowhere.
Watch your back, watch your face, mask up, wash your hands, keep your distance – you never know when those orange spiked balls may get you.
As with 9/11, whenever anyone questions the official narrative of Covid-19, the official statistics, the validity of the tests, the effectiveness of masks, the powers behind the heralded jjab to come, and the horrible consequences of the lockdowns that are destroying economies, killing people, forcing people to despair and to commit suicide, creating traumatized children, bankrupting small and middle-sized businesses for the sake of enriching the richest, etc., the corporate media mock the dissidents as conspiracy nuts, aiding the viral enemy.
This is so even when the dissenters are highly respected doctors, scientists, intellectuals, et al., who are regularly disappeared from the internet.
With September 11, there were initially far fewer dissenters than now, and so the censorship of opposing viewpoints didn’t need the blatant censorship that is now growing daily.
This censorship happens all across the internet now, quickly and stealthily, the same internet that is being forced on everyone as the new normal as presented in the Great Global Reset, the digital lie, where, as Anthony Fauci put it, no one should ever shake hands again.
A world of abstract images and beings in which, as Arthur Jensen tells Howard Beal in the film, Network, “All necessities [will be] provided, all anxieties tranquilized, all boredom amused.”
A digital dystopia that is fast approaching as perhaps the end of that red thread that runs from 9/11 to today.
Heidi Evens and Thomas Hackett write in the New York Daily News:
“With the nation’s illusion of safety and security in ruins, Americans begin the slow and fitful process of healing from a trauma that feels deeply, cruelly personal […] leaving citizens throughout the country with the frightening knowledge of their vulnerability.”
That was written on September 12, 2001.


humansarefree--2020-09-11--GOP Senators Introduce ‘Online Freedom and Viewpoint Diversity Act’ to Fight Big Tech Censorship

Three GOP Senators have announced a new bill called the Online Freedom and Viewpoint Diversity Act that aims to modify Section 230 of the Communications and Decency Act to clarify the original intent of the law and increase accountability faced by the Big Tech Masters of the Universe for their censorship of political speech .
According to a recent release from the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce , Science , and Transportation , Sen. Roger Wicker , the chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce , Science , and Transportation , Sen. Lindsey Graham , chairman of the Senate Committee @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Blackburn have introduced the Online Freedom and Viewpoint Diversity Act to modify Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act .
The bill would clarify the original intent of the Communications Decency Act and would increase accountability for Big Tech ’ s content moderation practices .
“ I ’ m very pleased to be working with Senators Wicker and Blackburn to bring about much-needed reform of Section 230 .
Social media companies are routinely censoring content that to many , should be considered valid political speech .
This reform proposal addresses the concerns of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are being unfairly suppressed.
” Big Tech companies have stretched their liability shield past its limits , and the national discourse now suffers because of it .
Today ’ s internet is a different online product from what was available in 1996 ; the polished megaplatforms we associate with online research and debate exert unprecedented influence over how Americans discover new information , and what information is available for discovery .
Moreover , the contentious nature of current conversations provides perverse incentive for these companies to manipulate the online experience in favor of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ There exists no meaningful alternative to these powerful platforms , which means there will be no accountability for the devastating effects of this ingrained ideological bias until Congress steps in and brings liability protections into the modern era .
According to the release , the Online Freedom and Viewpoint Diversity Act would : • Clarify when Section 230 ’ s liability protections apply to instances where online platforms choose to restrict access to certain types of content ; • Condition the content moderation liability shield on an objective reasonableness standard .
• In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a tech company may only restrict access to content on its platform where it has “ an objectively reasonable belief ” that the content falls within a certain , specified category ; • Remove “ otherwise objectionable ” and replace it with concrete terms , including “ promoting terrorism , ” content that is determined to be “ unlawful , ” and content that promotes “ self-harm.
” • Clarify that the definition of “ information content provider ” includes instances in which a person or entity editorializes or affirmatively and substantively modifies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ person or entity but does not include mere changes to format , layout , or basic appearance of such content .
Breitbart News reporter Allum Bokhari outlined some of the issues that many have with Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act in July , writing : Section 230 gives Big Tech companies immunity from lawsuits arising from user-generated content .
If a person is defamed on Google , YouTube , Facebook , Instagram , Twitter , or other big tech platforms like Reddit , those platforms are not legally liable for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This allows social media platforms to host billions of posts from users without a potentially crippling legal risk .
As Big Tech platforms have grown increasingly interested in censoring content posted by their users , however , many lawmakers have argued that they are behaving like traditional publishers , censoring and editing and approving their users ’ posts .
As such , a growing number of lawmakers have argued that the legal immunities of Section 230 should be contingent on platforms maintaining a hands-off approach to the speech of their users .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ subsection c-2 , which grants tech companies immunity from lawsuits arising from their censorship of “ objectionable ” content .
This immunity gives them broad leeway to censor users , leaving no legal recourse for those who are censored — even if their social media accounts are critical to their livelihood or career .
The full bill can be read here .

Three GOP Senators have announced a new bill called the Online Freedom and Viewpoint Diversity Act that aims to modify Section 230 of the Communications and Decency Act to clarify the original intent of the law and increase accountability faced by the Big Tech Masters of the Universe for their censorship of political speech.
According to a recent release from the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Sen. Roger Wicker, the chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Sen. Lindsey Graham, chairman of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, and Sen. Marsha Blackburn have introduced the Online Freedom and Viewpoint Diversity Act to modify Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
The bill would clarify the original intent of the Communications Decency Act and would increase accountability for Big Tech’s content moderation practices.
Senator Graham commented on the bill stating:
“I’m very pleased to be working with Senators Wicker and Blackburn to bring about much-needed reform of Section 230. Social media companies are routinely censoring content that to many, should be considered valid political speech. This reform proposal addresses the concerns of those who feel like their political views are being unfairly suppressed.”
Senator Blackburn provided the following statement:
Big Tech companies have stretched their liability shield past its limits, and the national discourse now suffers because of it.
Today’s internet is a different online product from what was available in 1996; the polished megaplatforms we associate with online research and debate exert unprecedented influence over how Americans discover new information, and what information is available for discovery.
Moreover, the contentious nature of current conversations provides perverse incentive for these companies to manipulate the online experience in favor of the loudest voices in the room.
There exists no meaningful alternative to these powerful platforms, which means there will be no accountability for the devastating effects of this ingrained ideological bias until Congress steps in and brings liability protections into the modern era.
According to the release, the Online Freedom and Viewpoint Diversity Act would:
Clarify when Section 230’s liability protections apply to instances where online platforms choose to restrict access to certain types of content;
Condition the content moderation liability shield on an objective reasonableness standard.
In order to be protected from liability, a tech company may only restrict access to content on its platform where it has “an objectively reasonable belief” that the content falls within a certain, specified category;
Remove “otherwise objectionable” and replace it with concrete terms, including “promoting terrorism,” content that is determined to be “unlawful,” and content that promotes “self-harm.”
Clarify that the definition of “information content provider” includes instances in which a person or entity editorializes or affirmatively and substantively modifies the content created or developed by another person or entity but does not include mere changes to format, layout, or basic appearance of such content.
Breitbart News reporter Allum Bokhari outlined some of the issues that many have with Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act in July, writing:
Section 230 gives Big Tech companies immunity from lawsuits arising from user-generated content.
If a person is defamed on Google, YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, or other big tech platforms like Reddit, those platforms are not legally liable for the content like a traditional publisher might be.
This allows social media platforms to host billions of posts from users without a potentially crippling legal risk.
As Big Tech platforms have grown increasingly interested in censoring content posted by their users, however, many lawmakers have argued that they are behaving like traditional publishers, censoring and editing and approving their users’ posts.
As such, a growing number of lawmakers have argued that the legal immunities of Section 230 should be contingent on platforms maintaining a hands-off approach to the speech of their users.
Another problematic element of Section 230 is subsection c-2, which grants tech companies immunity from lawsuits arising from their censorship of “objectionable” content.
This immunity gives them broad leeway to censor users, leaving no legal recourse for those who are censored — even if their social media accounts are critical to their livelihood or career.
The full bill can be read here.
Source: Breitbart.com


humansarefree--2020-09-11--Kamala Harris Endorsed California Lawmaker Behind ‘Pro-Pedophile’ Bill SB145

Senator Kamala Harris , Joe Biden ’ s running mate , endorsed a California lawmaker who was behind California ’ s recently passed SB145 .
Critics have dubbed SB145 the “ pro-pedophile ” bill for its relaxed automatic sex-offender registration guidelines .
These exempt some convicted pedophiles of “ certain offenses ” from mandatory sex-offender registration “ if the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor ” when the minor is between the ages of 14 and 17 , leaving the decision to the presiding judge .
Contrary to some claims , SB145 does not legalize @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which has passed the California legislature and could be signed by Governor Gavin Newsom , could let a “ woke ” judge keep a 24-year-old who had sex with a 14-year-old from being required to register as a sex offender .
SB145 was first introduced in January 2019 by California state Senator Scott Wiener , a gay Democrat representing San Francisco .
Wiener argued that SB145 “ eliminates discrimination against LGBTQ youth in our criminal justice system ” because judges already have this discretion when it comes to consensual vaginal sex between @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ten years older than them .
Critics argue that the bill should not have provided the same exemption for other sex acts , but rather removed all exemptions for automatic sex-offender registration to achieve equity .
“ I don ’ t care who it is between or what sex act it is , ” Democrat Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez explained .
“ That being said , I can not in my mind as a mother understand how sex between a 24-year-old and a 14-year-old could ever be consensual.
” Most of us , I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but Wiener , does not .
Kamala Harris endorsed him last month .
State Senator Wiener proudly showed off Kamala ’ s endorsement of his candidacy days after her selection as Joe Biden ’ s running mate .
“ I ’ ve known & worked with the next Vice President of the United States for nearly 20 years , ” he tweeted .
“ Kamala Harris also knows me & my work .
I ’ m honored to have Kamala ’ s endorsement of my reelection to the Senate.
” Kamala Harris , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ him and “ his work.
” Naturally , we can assume that this includes SB145 .
Will the media question Kamala Harris about SB145 , and ask whether she supports the idea that a 24-year-old who has sex with a 14-year-old shouldn ’ t automatically be registered as a sex offender ?
Don ’ t count on it .
She ’ s only running to be the second-most powerful person in the country .
Does the country really want a vice president who supports Scott Wiener and what he stands for ?
Should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ automatic sex-offender registration , or gotten rid of all exemptions ?
What does Kamala Harris believe ?
Do the so-called Republicans who back the Biden-Harris ticket really want those values in the White House ?

Senator Kamala Harris, Joe Biden’s running mate, endorsed a California lawmaker who was behind California’s recently passed SB145.
by Matt Margolis
Critics have dubbed SB145 the “pro-pedophile” bill for its relaxed automatic sex-offender registration guidelines.
These exempt some convicted pedophiles of “certain offenses” from mandatory sex-offender registration “if the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor” when the minor is between the ages of 14 and 17, leaving the decision to the presiding judge.
Contrary to some claims, SB145 does not legalize pedophilia in California, but the bill, which has passed the California legislature and could be signed by Governor Gavin Newsom, could let a “woke” judge keep a 24-year-old who had sex with a 14-year-old from being required to register as a sex offender.
SB145 was first introduced in January 2019 by California state Senator Scott Wiener, a gay Democrat representing San Francisco.
Wiener argued that SB145 “eliminates discrimination against LGBTQ youth in our criminal justice system” because judges already have this discretion when it comes to consensual vaginal sex between 14-17 year olds and adults less than ten years older than them.
Critics argue that the bill should not have provided the same exemption for other sex acts, but rather removed all exemptions for automatic sex-offender registration to achieve equity.
“I don’t care who it is between or what sex act it is,” Democrat Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez explained.
“That being said, I cannot in my mind as a mother understand how sex between a 24-year-old and a 14-year-old could ever be consensual.”
Most of us, I believe, would agree with Gonzalez, but Wiener, does not. Kamala Harris endorsed him last month.
State Senator Wiener proudly showed off Kamala’s endorsement of his candidacy days after her selection as Joe Biden’s running mate.
“I’ve known & worked with the next Vice President of the United States for nearly 20 years,” he tweeted.
“Kamala Harris also knows me & my work. I’m honored to have Kamala’s endorsement of my reelection to the Senate.”
Kamala Harris, according to Wiener, “knows” him and “his work.” Naturally, we can assume that this includes SB145.
Will the media question Kamala Harris about SB145, and ask whether she supports the idea that a 24-year-old who has sex with a 14-year-old shouldn’t automatically be registered as a sex offender? Don’t count on it.
She’s only running to be the second-most powerful person in the country.
Does the country really want a vice president who supports Scott Wiener and what he stands for?
Should California have created a new exemption for automatic sex-offender registration, or gotten rid of all exemptions? What does Kamala Harris believe?
Do the so-called Republicans who back the Biden-Harris ticket really want those values in the White House?


humansarefree--2020-09-11--The Transgender Agenda is a Form of Mass Hysteria

As a nation of economically dependent people relies upon a government for aid , alms , and financial support , a nation of weaklings and cowards , dependent upon the physical protection of others , does the same .
Economic self-reliance is but one kind of independence ; there are other types .
Physical safety is another form of independence , and an often overlooked and underconsidered one .
People may look to power/ authority , typically governmental power/ authority , for both physical and economic security .
People who do not feel safe and secure , those who can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rights and interests , are more likely to tolerate police state tactics , mass surveillance , heavily armed policemen , unthinkably intrusive laws , etc .
The social condition of widespread debility and pusillanimity can enable the growth of a powerful state , just as diversity can .
Diverse societies are unstable and mistrusting societies .
Mistrusting and unstable societies are societies that require a potentate to stay together and in order .
Diversity , like widespread physical weakness , effeminacy , and timidity , is fertile soil for statism to take root @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to violence , namely the rough , the violent themselves , may tolerate statist tactics as well , mostly on account of their own natural comfort with violence and brutality .
However , they are generally less likely to crave such tactics and need such tactics in the same way that those who can not put in their own work will .
Weaklings are notorious for loving cruelty in the service of their own causes , and for preferring a highly controlled environment where they are safe , to a state of liberty @ @ @ @ @ @ @ masculates women to the same extent it emasculates men , thus leading to no net loss , this is not so .
Women can not be men .
Not really .
Masculine women , pumped up on male hormones or delusions of physical strength , are not really comparable to men .
A masculine woman , except in the rarest of cases , is a cheap substitute for a real man , as a feminine or “ gender dysmorphic ” man is a cheap substitute for a real woman .
A gender dysmorphic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ man and a gender dysmorphic biological male can not breed like a woman .
Both are basically dead weight everywhere but in Hollywood movies .
Thus , you really just lose men and women and never gain any .
Ultimately , it is fine to see transgenderism as a form of mass hysteria ( think 17th Century Dutch “ tulip mania ” ) , because it is .
And it is fine to have a problem with teachers normalizing transgenderism amongst the young , those whose minds are plastic and whose identities are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and easily disoriented , and liable to be manipulated or deceived and led on errant paths to misery and ruin .
Just as it is fine to see the proliferation of those who identify as transgender , and the normalization of this bizarre and delusional pathology , as a function of the moral nihilism and relativism that defines our times .
Indeed , one might even argue that the number of transgender folk is increasing rapidly for the same reason that hate hoaxes , like the recent Jussie Smollett debacle , are increasing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be a victim and everyone wants to enjoy the many benefits of victimhood .
The self-same Cultural Marxist social forces are incentivizing these two unrelated phenomena .
Nevertheless , the normalization of transgenderism ( and to a lesser extent homosexuality ) , serves another purpose , and we must not discount that purpose as being another motivation leftist elites possess for normalizing these things and flooding us with incessant propaganda and conditioning concerning them .
An effeminate and weak ( and especially a confused and delusional ) population is more inclined to look @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when the Cultural Marxist power structure seeks to normalize these bizarre behaviors and pathologies , it not only weakens the people , it strengthens itself .
A nation of weaklings and girlie men is an invitation to statism and totalitarianism .
The weak and cowardly can not defend themselves .
They will not defend themselves .
They will thus look to government for safety and security .
This is likely another very important reason why the Cultural Marxists who rule over us are normalizing transgenderism and homosexuality , and now even calling masculinity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a nation of damsels ever in distress .
Damsels can not defend themselves from external threats .
They can not defend themselves from minor threats posed by common , albeit violent criminals , who fancy themselves eternal victims no matter how many innocents they victimize , and they especially can not defend themselves from tyrannical Marxist threats , which fancy themselves liberal democratic governments , no matter how illiberal or anti-democratic they have become .

As a nation of economically dependent people relies upon a government for aid, alms, and financial support, a nation of weaklings and cowards, dependent upon the physical protection of others, does the same.
Economic self-reliance is but one kind of independence; there are other types. Physical safety is another form of independence, and an often overlooked and underconsidered one.
People may look to power/ authority, typically governmental power/ authority, for both physical and economic security.
People who do not feel safe and secure, those who can not defend themselves or safeguard their own rights and interests, are more likely to tolerate police state tactics, mass surveillance, heavily armed policemen, unthinkably intrusive laws, etc.
The social condition of widespread debility and pusillanimity can enable the growth of a powerful state, just as diversity can. Diverse societies are unstable and mistrusting societies.
Mistrusting and unstable societies are societies that require a potentate to stay together and in order.
Diversity, like widespread physical weakness, effeminacy, and timidity, is fertile soil for statism to take root and grow.
Granted, those accustomed to violence, namely the rough, the violent themselves, may tolerate statist tactics as well, mostly on account of their own natural comfort with violence and brutality.
However, they are generally less likely to crave such tactics and need such tactics in the same way that those who can not put in their own work will.
Weaklings are notorious for loving cruelty in the service of their own causes, and for preferring a highly controlled environment where they are safe, to a state of liberty.
While some might argue that transgenderism masculates women to the same extent it emasculates men, thus leading to no net loss, this is not so. Women can not be men. Not really.
Masculine women, pumped up on male hormones or delusions of physical strength, are not really comparable to men.
A masculine woman, except in the rarest of cases, is a cheap substitute for a real man, as a feminine or “gender dysmorphic” man is a cheap substitute for a real woman.
A gender dysmorphic biological female can not fight like a man and a gender dysmorphic biological male can not breed like a woman.
Both are basically dead weight everywhere but in Hollywood movies. Thus, you really just lose men and women and never gain any.
Ultimately, it is fine to see transgenderism as a form of mass hysteria (think 17th Century Dutch “tulip mania”), because it is.
And it is fine to have a problem with teachers normalizing transgenderism amongst the young, those whose minds are plastic and whose identities are unformed, since they are highly impressionable and easily disoriented, and liable to be manipulated or deceived and led on errant paths to misery and ruin.
Just as it is fine to see the proliferation of those who identify as transgender, and the normalization of this bizarre and delusional pathology, as a function of the moral nihilism and relativism that defines our times.
Indeed, one might even argue that the number of transgender folk is increasing rapidly for the same reason that hate hoaxes, like the recent Jussie Smollett debacle, are increasing rapidly, namely because everyone wants to be a victim and everyone wants to enjoy the many benefits of victimhood.
The self-same Cultural Marxist social forces are incentivizing these two unrelated phenomena.
Nevertheless, the normalization of transgenderism (and to a lesser extent homosexuality), serves another purpose, and we must not discount that purpose as being another motivation leftist elites possess for normalizing these things and flooding us with incessant propaganda and conditioning concerning them.
An effeminate and weak (and especially a confused and delusional) population is more inclined to look to government for security.
Thus, when the Cultural Marxist power structure seeks to normalize these bizarre behaviors and pathologies, it not only weakens the people, it strengthens itself.
A nation of weaklings and girlie men is an invitation to statism and totalitarianism. The weak and cowardly can not defend themselves. They will not defend themselves.
They will thus look to government for safety and security. This is likely another very important reason why the Cultural Marxists who rule over us are normalizing transgenderism and homosexuality, and now even calling masculinity itself “toxic”.
They desire a nation of damsels ever in distress. Damsels can not defend themselves from external threats.
They can not defend themselves from minor threats posed by common, albeit violent criminals, who fancy themselves eternal victims no matter how many innocents they victimize, and they especially can not defend themselves from tyrannical Marxist threats, which fancy themselves liberal democratic governments, no matter how illiberal or anti-democratic they have become.
Source: Russia-insider.com


humansarefree--2020-09-11--Nexflix’s ‘Cuties’ is ALL About Pedophilia

Here are just some of the things that happen in the series : – an 11 year old girl takes a photo of her vagina and posts it online – the 5 young girls take a turn at webcam porn – a young girl tries to take a photo of a schoolboys penis – an 11 year old girl finds a used condom and blows it up The ‘ Cuties ’ movie that stirred controversy last month following the release of its trailer has now been released and it ’ s even worse – featuring numerous scenes that showcase the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ previously highlighted , the French production centers around four pre-teen children from a ‘ diverse ’ neighborhood attempting to win a dance competition .
The trailer shows the girls twerking and adopting other sexualized poses .
Even after a massive backlash , Netflix refused to pull the plug on the movie , acknowledging merely that the promo poster for the film was unsuitable and that it would be changed .
After its release last night , Twitter user Ghost Jim watched the movie and posted several clips which illustrate how the film is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Netflix just released the controversial ‘ Cuties ’ and it ’ s worse than you could imagine .
Make no mistake : Netflix is at the forefront of sexualizing children and normalizing pedophilia !
” he tweeted .
The first clip shows the girls aggressively shaking their backsides while putting their fingers in their mouth : The next clips shows the girls wearing skimpy outfits dancing on stage in front of judges in a similar manner while an audience watches , some of them applauding , some of them booing : Note that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ characters is very similar to that seen in WAP ( Wet-Ass Pussy ) – a Cardi B song released last month which caused controversy for its overtly sexual dance choreography , something that has since been copied by underage girls across America .
The next scene shows the black girl in the movie vigorously shaking her entire body : The next scene is perhaps the most revolting of all .
It shows the girls accusing a security guard of being a “ pervert ” and trying to molest them .
Another security guard @ @ @ @ @ @ @ performing a dance in front of him as he ogles her and the camera lingers on her torso : “ That ’ s as far as I ’ ll go with this demonic garbage .
No doubt the film has much more .
Netflix is streaming it right into peoples homes where young , impressionable girls can watch it .
And where grown men with sexual attraction to children can pleasure themselves to .
Thanks Netflix !
” remarks the Twitter user .
He then reveals the details of other revolting scenes in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with webcam porn and a girl taking a photo of her vagina and posting it online .
While Turkey ’ s media watchdog has ordered the film removed from Turkey ’ s Netflix portal , British newspaper the Independent described the movie as an “ important contribution to the coming-of-age genre.
” The New Yorker ’ s blasted a “ scurrilous campaign against the film ” waged by right-wingers , while Rolling Stone called the movie “ a sensitive portrait of growing pains that deserves to be seen.
” Meanwhile , a petition @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has reached over 156,000 signatures .

Here are just some of the things that happen in the series:
– an 11 year old girl takes a photo of her vagina and posts it online
– the 5 young girls take a turn at webcam porn
– a young girl tries to take a photo of a schoolboys penis
– an 11 year old girl finds a used condom and blows it up
The ‘Cuties’ movie that stirred controversy last month following the release of its trailer has now been released and it’s even worse – featuring numerous scenes that showcase the vile sexualization of children.
As we previously highlighted, the French production centers around four pre-teen children from a ‘diverse’ neighborhood attempting to win a dance competition. The trailer shows the girls twerking and adopting other sexualized poses.
Even after a massive backlash, Netflix refused to pull the plug on the movie, acknowledging merely that the promo poster for the film was unsuitable and that it would be changed.
After its release last night, Twitter user Ghost Jim watched the movie and posted several clips which illustrate how the film is basically soft porn for pedophiles.
“Netflix just released the controversial ‘Cuties’ and it’s worse than you could imagine. Make no mistake: Netflix is at the forefront of sexualizing children and normalizing pedophilia!” he tweeted.
The first clip shows the girls aggressively shaking their backsides while putting their fingers in their mouth:
Netflix just released the controversial 'Cuties' and it's worse than you could imagine. Make no mistake: Netflix is at the forefront of sexualizing children and normalizing pedophilia! pic.twitter.com/emiMzk8w1z — 𝗚𝗵𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗝𝗶𝗺 (@GhostJim4) September 9, 2020
The next clips shows the girls wearing skimpy outfits dancing on stage in front of judges in a similar manner while an audience watches, some of them applauding, some of them booing:
Someone needs to go to jail for this shit! pic.twitter.com/Ln0CnZSyok — 𝗚𝗵𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗝𝗶𝗺 (@GhostJim4) September 9, 2020
Note that the dance routine performed by the main characters is very similar to that seen in WAP (Wet-Ass Pussy) – a Cardi B song released last month which caused controversy for its overtly sexual dance choreography, something that has since been copied by underage girls across America.
The next scene shows the black girl in the movie vigorously shaking her entire body:
“I received numerous attacks on my character from people who had not seen the film, who thought I was actually making a film that was apologetic about hypersexualisation of children” – Cuties director Maïmouna Doucouré Really? pic.twitter.com/CGyXPdtR3G — 𝗚𝗵𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗝𝗶𝗺 (@GhostJim4) September 9, 2020
The next scene is perhaps the most revolting of all. It shows the girls accusing a security guard of being a “pervert” and trying to molest them.
Another security guard then arrives and the black girl begins performing a dance in front of him as he ogles her and the camera lingers on her torso:
In case you believe everyone is just naive and didn't think this had anything to do with pedophilia: pic.twitter.com/z9IBpup2JV — 𝗚𝗵𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗝𝗶𝗺 (@GhostJim4) September 9, 2020
“That’s as far as I’ll go with this demonic garbage. No doubt the film has much more. Netflix is streaming it right into peoples homes where young, impressionable girls can watch it. And where grown men with sexual attraction to children can pleasure themselves to. Thanks Netflix!” remarks the Twitter user.
He then reveals the details of other revolting scenes in the film, including the girls experimenting with webcam porn and a girl taking a photo of her vagina and posting it online.
While Turkey’s media watchdog has ordered the film removed from Turkey’s Netflix portal, British newspaper the Independent described the movie as an “important contribution to the coming-of-age genre.”
The New Yorker’s blasted a “scurrilous campaign against the film” waged by right-wingers, while Rolling Stone called the movie “a sensitive portrait of growing pains that deserves to be seen.”
Meanwhile, a petition to pressure Netflix into removing the movie has reached over 156,000 signatures.
Reference: Summit.news


humansarefree--2020-09-12--Burger King Depicts Mascot in Gay Kiss with Ronald McDonald

Burger King has launched a new advertising campaign in Finland featuring its eponymous mascot sharing a deep kiss with Ronald McDonald , along with the English slogan ‘ Love Conquers All ’ .
The image is front and centre on the landing page of the fast food chain ’ s Finnish website , with various outlets with a focus on advertising showing physical posters at locations such as public bus stops as well .
The campaign appears to be in aid of Helsinki Pride Week , which was moved to September from its usual slot due to the Chinese coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been influenced by the race politics of the Black Lives Matter movement , featuring the new version of the Pride flag topped with a black and brown stripe in order to “ represent ” non-white non-heterosexuals specifically .
“ Burger King has always stood for equality , love and everyone ’ s right to be just the way they are , ” claimed the burger-selling franchise ’ s brand manager in Finland , Kaisa Kasila .
“ The only instance where it might not seem so , is when we ’ re bantering @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be clear – it all stems from the respect we have for them .
And we know McDonald ’ s stands for the values we stand for , too , ” Kasila added .
“ We thought , what a better way to convey our values than by portraying an all-encompassing kiss between Burger King and McDonald .
We wanted to show that in the end , love always wins.
” Burger King is by no means the only multi-national enterprises to indulge in advertising campaigns which have much to do with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to do with their core business in recent years .
Just this August , for example , Unilever-owned Ben & Jerry ’ s launched into a tirade against the British government on social media for his rhetoric — but not action — against the steadily worsening Channel migrant crisis , which has seen waves of up to 416 migrants a day crossing to England from France in small boats daily .
“ [ W ] e think the real crisis is our lack of humanity for people fleeing war , climate change and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in a lengthy Twitter thread — heedless of the fact that illegal aliens are not facing war or torture in France , and that climate change , such as it is , is the same on both sides of the English Channel .
This fashion for mammoth corporate interests indulging in divisive left-wing political activism has been dubbed “ woke capitalism ” by critics .

Burger King has launched a new advertising campaign in Finland featuring its eponymous mascot sharing a deep kiss with Ronald McDonald, along with the English slogan ‘Love Conquers All’.
The image is front and centre on the landing page of the fast food chain’s Finnish website, with various outlets with a focus on advertising showing physical posters at locations such as public bus stops as well.
The campaign appears to be in aid of Helsinki Pride Week, which was moved to September from its usual slot due to the Chinese coronavirus pandemic. It also appears to have been influenced by the race politics of the Black Lives Matter movement, featuring the new version of the Pride flag topped with a black and brown stripe in order to “represent” non-white non-heterosexuals specifically.
“Burger King has always stood for equality, love and everyone’s right to be just the way they are,” claimed the burger-selling franchise’s brand manager in Finland, Kaisa Kasila.
“The only instance where it might not seem so, is when we’re bantering with our competitor. But we want to be clear – it all stems from the respect we have for them. And we know McDonald’s stands for the values we stand for, too,” Kasila added.
“We thought, what a better way to convey our values than by portraying an all-encompassing kiss between Burger King and McDonald. We wanted to show that in the end, love always wins.”
Burger King is by no means the only multi-national enterprises to indulge in advertising campaigns which have much to do with politics and social justice causes and little to do with their core business in recent years.
Just this August, for example, Unilever-owned Ben & Jerry’s launched into a tirade against the British government on social media for his rhetoric — but not action — against the steadily worsening Channel migrant crisis, which has seen waves of up to 416 migrants a day crossing to England from France in small boats daily.
“[W]e think the real crisis is our lack of humanity for people fleeing war, climate change and torture,” the ice-cream sellers lectured in a lengthy Twitter thread — heedless of the fact that illegal aliens are not facing war or torture in France, and that climate change, such as it is, is the same on both sides of the English Channel.
This fashion for mammoth corporate interests indulging in divisive left-wing political activism has been dubbed “woke capitalism” by critics.
Source: Breitbart.com


humansarefree--2020-09-12--9/11 to COVID-911: From Homeland Security to Biosecurity

9/11 , as we were told repeatedly in the days , weeks , and months after the attack , was @ @ @ @ @ .
And now a new event has come along to once again throw the world @ @ @ @ @ the post-9/11 era introduced America to the concept of homeland security , the COVID-19 era @ @ @ @ @ an altogether more abstract concept : biosecurity .
This is the story of the COVID-911 @ @ @

9/11, as we were told repeatedly in the days, weeks, and months after the attack, was the day that changed everything.
And now a new event has come along to once again throw the world into chaos.
But whereas the post-9/11 era introduced America to the concept of homeland security, the COVID-19 era is introducing the world to an altogether more abstract concept: biosecurity.
This is the story of the COVID-911 security state:
Source: YouTube.com


humansarefree--2020-09-12--Ex-NSA Director Who Oversaw Unlawful Spying Program Joins Amazon’s Board of Directors

In a new filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission this week , Amazon revealed that former NSA director Keith Alexander will be joining the company ’ s board of directors .
Alexander was the controversial spokesperson for the NSA when the agency was facing scrutiny over Edward Snowden ’ s leaks , which revealed the details of a massive spy program .
During the scandal , Alexander discouraged the media from reporting on the details of the leaks , and talked about Snowden as if he was a war criminal .
“ I think it ’ s wrong that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the 50,000-whatever they have and are selling them and giving them out as if these — you know it just doesn ’ t make sense .
“ We ought to come up with a way of stopping it .
I don ’ t know how to do that .
That ’ s more of the courts and the policymakers but , from my perspective , it ’ s wrong to allow this to go on , ” Alexander said in an interview in 2013 .
Snowden responded to Alexander ’ s new @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Web Services is responsible for hosting a large number of websites , and now the person who oversaw the mass surveillance program is going to be getting access to all of it .
Last week , a federal appeals court ruled that the NSA spying programs were actually illegal and unconstitutional .
The ruling was made by Judge Marsha Berzon , who determined that the NSA had no legal authority to collect phone and internet data from innocent people under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act , or FISA .
The program was illegal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ collection , and “ required the government to make a showing of relevance to a particular authorized investigation before collecting the records , ” Berzon said in her ruling .
Not only was the program illegal , but it was essentially worthless as well , and did nothing to prevent terrorism or bring terrorists to justice .
Berzon said that there is no evidence that the spying program actually did anything to prevent a single case of terrorism , despite claims from US officials that the programs were absolutely necessary to prevent terror @ @

In a new filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission this week, Amazon revealed that former NSA director Keith Alexander will be joining the company’s board of directors.
Alexander was the controversial spokesperson for the NSA when the agency was facing scrutiny over Edward Snowden’s leaks, which revealed the details of a massive spy program.
During the scandal, Alexander discouraged the media from reporting on the details of the leaks, and talked about Snowden as if he was a war criminal.
“I think it’s wrong that that newspaper reporters have all these documents, the 50,000-whatever they have and are selling them and giving them out as if these — you know it just doesn’t make sense.
“We ought to come up with a way of stopping it. I don’t know how to do that. That’s more of the courts and the policymakers but, from my perspective, it’s wrong to allow this to go on,” Alexander said in an interview in 2013.
Snowden responded to Alexander’s new board seat by pointing out that Amazon Web Services is responsible for hosting a large number of websites, and now the person who oversaw the mass surveillance program is going to be getting access to all of it.
Last week, a federal appeals court ruled that the NSA spying programs were actually illegal and unconstitutional.
The ruling was made by Judge Marsha Berzon, who determined that the NSA had no legal authority to collect phone and internet data from innocent people under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA.
The program was illegal because FISA did not allow for bulk collection, and “required the government to make a showing of relevance to a particular authorized investigation before collecting the records,” Berzon said in her ruling.
Not only was the program illegal, but it was essentially worthless as well, and did nothing to prevent terrorism or bring terrorists to justice.
Berzon said that there is no evidence that the spying program actually did anything to prevent a single case of terrorism, despite claims from US officials that the programs were absolutely necessary to prevent terror attacks.
By John Vibes, Truth Theory


humansarefree--2020-09-12--IMDb Parental Warning for Netflix’s ‘Cuties’ Says Scenes in Movie are ‘Lawfully Defined as Pedophili

IMDb Parental Warning for Netflix’s ‘Cuties’ Says Scenes in Movie are ‘Lawfully Defined as Pedophilia’

IMDb ’ s parental warning on the new Netflix movie ‘ Cuties ’ literally states that some of the scenes in the film are “ lawfully defined as pedophilia.
” Outrage over the film , which focuses on four pre-teen girls preparing for a dance competition , has exploded after the full movie was released last night .
As we highlighted earlier , there are numerous scenes where children are overtly sexualized in the most disgusting ways possible .
Despite the backlash , which led to # CancelNetflix trending on Twitter today , the mainstream media has been gushing in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lauding the film , journalists are celebrating a movie which IMDb ’ s parental guide literally describes as pedophilia .
“ Parental Warning : During one of the many highly sexualized & erotic dance scenes that purposefully exploit & objectify numerous scantily clad under age girls , one of the female child dancers lifts up her cropped top to fully display her bare breast .
“ This is lawfully defined as pedophilia and can be extremely distressing to many viewers , ” states the text on the IMDb website .
The website then @ @ @ @ @ @ @ children in the movie are sexualized .
“ Trigger Warning : An 11 year old girl watches a female rap music video where naked women role play through dance both heterosexual & lesbian sex acts .
“ An 11 year old female dance group then mimics these sexual moves via on themselves and on each other while the camera zooms in on their sexual body parts as they erotically writher .
This can be highly distressing to many viewers.
” “ Female breast nudity of a minor during an erotic dance scene and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , bums and spread crotches of scantily clad 11 year old girls during numerous sexualized dance routines.
” “ A pair of tight leather pants on an 11 year old girl are forcefully pulled down in the midst of a scuffle ; the camera glances at her panty exposed bum.
” UPDATE : IMDB runs cover for ‘ Cuties ’ – waters down its warning .
Despite the transparently vile nature of the film , it has received a 90 % positive review score on Rotten Tomatoes .
The media responded to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being “ angry ” over a film which is in fact a ‘ beautiful ’ “ coming of age ” story .
There is nothing more to say aside from the fact that the entertainment industry and the media is run by truly sick people .

IMDb’s parental warning on the new Netflix movie ‘Cuties’ literally states that some of the scenes in the film are “lawfully defined as pedophilia.”
Outrage over the film, which focuses on four pre-teen girls preparing for a dance competition, has exploded after the full movie was released last night.
As we highlighted earlier, there are numerous scenes where children are overtly sexualized in the most disgusting ways possible.
Despite the backlash, which led to #CancelNetflix trending on Twitter today, the mainstream media has been gushing in its praise for the movie.
In lauding the film, journalists are celebrating a movie which IMDb’s parental guide literally describes as pedophilia.
“Parental Warning: During one of the many highly sexualized & erotic dance scenes that purposefully exploit & objectify numerous scantily clad under age girls, one of the female child dancers lifts up her cropped top to fully display her bare breast.
“This is lawfully defined as pedophilia and can be extremely distressing to many viewers,” states the text on the IMDb website.
In case you believe everyone is just naive and didn't think this had anything to do with pedophilia: pic.twitter.com/z9IBpup2JV — 𝗚𝗵𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗝𝗶𝗺 (@GhostJim4) September 9, 2020
The website then lists numerous other instances of how the children in the movie are sexualized.
“Trigger Warning: An 11 year old girl watches a female rap music video where naked women role play through dance both heterosexual & lesbian sex acts.
“An 11 year old female dance group then mimics these sexual moves via on themselves and on each other while the camera zooms in on their sexual body parts as they erotically writher. This can be highly distressing to many viewers.”
“Female breast nudity of a minor during an erotic dance scene and lengthy & excessive closeup shots of breasts, bums and spread crotches of scantily clad 11 year old girls during numerous sexualized dance routines.”
“A pair of tight leather pants on an 11 year old girl are forcefully pulled down in the midst of a scuffle; the camera glances at her panty exposed bum.”
that movie cuties dropped and wtf. this is straight from IMDB 😐 pic.twitter.com/y4RVyQ51ox — ★ low-nah-gee ★ (@ebonixfem) September 10, 2020
UPDATE: IMDB runs cover for ‘Cuties’ – waters down its warning.
even @IMDb is running cover for @netflix's "CUTIES" by watering down the parental warnings. the parental guide BEFORE (left) vs. AFTER (right) BEFORE link: https://t.co/un0wLrHmHX AFTER link: https://t.co/oMBTlCu6gu pic.twitter.com/sfNzCxBPjy — Siraj Hashmi (@SirajAHashmi) September 10, 2020
Despite the transparently vile nature of the film, it has received a 90% positive review score on Rotten Tomatoes.
Live look at the absolute joke that has become of the movie critic business…#CancelNetflix #BoycottNetflix pic.twitter.com/65WFjgt6yd — Matthew White (@atMatthewWhite) September 10, 2020
The media responded to the controversy by blaming “right-wingers” for being “angry” over a film which is in fact a ‘beautiful’ “coming of age” story.
They're all promoting it as a "coming of age" movie. Watch the clips. Hideous. pic.twitter.com/nYT64hKnta — Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) September 10, 2020
There is nothing more to say aside from the fact that the entertainment industry and the media is run by truly sick people.
Reference: Summit.news


humansarefree--2020-09-12--NOT Global Warming: Oregon Officials Announce Arrest of Two More Alleged Arsonists Including Crimina

NOT Global Warming: Oregon Officials Announce Arrest of Two More Alleged Arsonists Including Criminal Transient

Jonathan Maas , 44 , of Springfield ( on left ) and Michael Jarrod Bokkela , 41 ( on right ) were arrested for arson by Oregon officials .
Jonathan Maas was arrested for allegedly starting a fire in the woods near the frisbee golf course at Dexter State Recreation Area in Oregon .
A man faces accusations he tried to start a fire in the woods near the frisbee golf course at Dexter State Recreation Area on Wednesday .
Firefighters responded to the scene and found passersby had quickly put out the fire , the Dexter fire chief said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was in a wooded area and was approximately 5 feet in diameter before it was extinguished by two people playing frisbee golf in the area , ” the sheriff ’ s office said .
“ A man in a minivan was seen leaving the area shortly before the fire was discovered.
” On Thursday , deputies arrested Jonathan Maas , 44 , of Springfield on suspicion of arson in the first degree in connection with the Dexter fire .
Transient Michael Jarrod Bakkela , who has a lengthy criminal record , was arrested @ @ @ @ @ @ @ roared through Phoenix and Talent , Oregon this week .
It was the same thing in Australia during the bush fires .
of earlier this year : Nearly 200 People Arrested Across Australia For Deliberately Starting Bushfires A man faces accusations he set a fire during the Almeda Fire that roared through Phoneix and Talent this week .
“ This case is separate from the Almeda Fire investigation but the investigations have been a joint effort by the Major Assault Death Investigation Unit , ” the Jackson County Sheriff ’ s Office said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with a report to 911 that residents witnessed the man “ lighting a fire behind their house on Quail Lane , ” the sheriff ’ s office said .
“ Due to the impending fire , the witnesses had to flee their home and could not be interviewed immediately.
” When deputies and state troopers arrived , they found Michael Jarrod Bakkela , 41 , standing “ close to a very large fire threatening several homes , the sheriff ’ s office said .

Jonathan Maas, 44, of Springfield (on left) and Michael Jarrod Bokkela, 41 (on right) were arrested for arson by Oregon officials.
Jonathan Maas was arrested for allegedly starting a fire in the woods near the frisbee golf course at Dexter State Recreation Area in Oregon.
MSN.com reported:
A man faces accusations he tried to start a fire in the woods near the frisbee golf course at Dexter State Recreation Area on Wednesday.
Firefighters responded to the scene and found passersby had quickly put out the fire, the Dexter fire chief said earlier this week.
“The fire was in a wooded area and was approximately 5 feet in diameter before it was extinguished by two people playing frisbee golf in the area,” the sheriff’s office said.
“A man in a minivan was seen leaving the area shortly before the fire was discovered.”
The Lane County Sheriff’s Office investigated the fire.
On Thursday, deputies arrested Jonathan Maas, 44, of Springfield on suspicion of arson in the first degree in connection with the Dexter fire.
Transient Michael Jarrod Bakkela, who has a lengthy criminal record, was arrested for allegedly starting the Almeda Fire that roared through Phoenix and Talent, Oregon this week.
It was the same thing in Australia during the bush fires. of earlier this year: Nearly 200 People Arrested Across Australia For Deliberately Starting Bushfires
KVAL reported:
A man faces accusations he set a fire during the Almeda Fire that roared through Phoneix and Talent this week.
“This case is separate from the Almeda Fire investigation but the investigations have been a joint effort by the Major Assault Death Investigation Unit,” the Jackson County Sheriff’s Office said Friday.
The investigation started September 8 with a report to 911 that residents witnessed the man “lighting a fire behind their house on Quail Lane,” the sheriff’s office said.
“Due to the impending fire, the witnesses had to flee their home and could not be interviewed immediately.”
When deputies and state troopers arrived, they found Michael Jarrod Bakkela, 41, standing “close to a very large fire threatening several homes, the sheriff’s office said.
Reference: Thegatewaypundit.com


humansarefree--2020-09-12--China Combines Contact Tracing With Their Infamous Social Credit Score

The Communist government of China has combined its coronavirus ‘ track and trace ’ system with the country ’ s notorious social credit score .
As the Epoch Times ’ Joshua Philipp explains , fears that the new COVID surveillance system would be used for “ totalitarian social monitoring ” are being realized in China .
“ The local government of China ’ s Jiangsu province has launched a new social control system that combines the CCP ’ s health code program with the regime ’ s social credit system to create what they ’ re calling a civilization code @ @ @ @ @ @ @ system ranks each citizen via a “ civilization score ” and then places them in a category which determines whether they get priority access to services or are punished and restricted .
The new system represents an expansion of the social credit score and is being initially rolled out in the city of Suzhou and will apply to everyone over the age of 18 .
Last year , we also highlighted how Chinese citizens would need to pass a facial recognition test to access the Internet in another expansion of the social credit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Communist state bragged about how it had prevented 2.5 million “ discredited entities ” from purchasing plane tickets and 90,000 people from buying high speed train tickets in the month of July alone .
As we document in the video below , the onerous social credit score system is literally designed to punish and socially ostracize dissidents who express controversial opinions .
In the age of social media deplatforming , an identical system is gradually being introduced in the west , where people who have been banned by social media networks for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deplatformed by companies and banks .

The Communist government of China has combined its coronavirus ‘track and trace’ system with the country’s notorious social credit score.
As the Epoch Times’ Joshua Philipp explains, fears that the new COVID surveillance system would be used for “totalitarian social monitoring” are being realized in China.
“The local government of China’s Jiangsu province has launched a new social control system that combines the CCP’s health code program with the regime’s social credit system to create what they’re calling a civilization code,” Philipp reported.
The new system ranks each citizen via a “civilization score” and then places them in a category which determines whether they get priority access to services or are punished and restricted.
The new system represents an expansion of the social credit score and is being initially rolled out in the city of Suzhou and will apply to everyone over the age of 18.
CCP has launched a new #SocialControl system called “civilization code,” that combines China’s coronavirus #HealthCode app with the “social credit system” which allows the #CCP to track and trace citizens with a tighter grip. WATCH HERE 👉 https://t.co/AtA8xajdWM pic.twitter.com/OBuM5gHD5g — crossroads (@crossroads_josh) September 9, 2020
Last year, we also highlighted how Chinese citizens would need to pass a facial recognition test to access the Internet in another expansion of the social credit score system.
In August 2019, the Communist state bragged about how it had prevented 2.5 million “discredited entities” from purchasing plane tickets and 90,000 people from buying high speed train tickets in the month of July alone.
As we document in the video below, the onerous social credit score system is literally designed to punish and socially ostracize dissidents who express controversial opinions.
In the age of social media deplatforming, an identical system is gradually being introduced in the west, where people who have been banned by social media networks for ‘offensive’ views are then also deplatformed by companies and banks.
By Paul Joseph Watson, Guest writer