humansarefree--2020-10-29--DC Bill Will Allow Kids As Young as 11 to Be Vaccinated Without Parental Knowledge or Consent

On Oct. 7 , 2020 , during a hastily scheduled virtual meeting,1 four District of Columbia Council members making up the Health Committee2 amended and unanimously passed a minor consent bill , B23-0171.3 The bill would not only permit children aged 11 years and older to give consent for doctors and other vaccine administrators to give them vaccines without their parents ’ knowledge or consent , but would also require insurance companies , vaccine administrators and schools to conceal from parents that the child has been vaccinated .
On Oct. 20 , 2020,4 the entire DC Council voted in favor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reading in yet another virtual online meeting6 with no public testimony .
It was announced that the second reading , which will be the final vote , will take place on Nov. 10 , 2020.7 Committee Chair and Bill Sponsor Admit “ Imminent ” COVID-19 Vaccine is Reason for Sudden Push to Eliminate Parental Rights NVIC issued an alert8 through the online NVIC Advocacy Portal when the bill had it ’ s first public hearing in June of 2019 advising opposition to the bill , which violated parental medical informed consent rights .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ against the bill.10 B23-0171 then sat for over a year untouched and unmoved .
In a revealing statement Vincent C. Gray ( D-Ward 7 ) , the chair of the DC Health Committee which passed the bill , explained why the bill was all suddenly being revived and pushed through so quickly .
Gray was quoted in The Washington Post as saying , “ the hope of an imminent coronavirus vaccine gave the bill new urgency.
” 11 Primary sponsor of this bill , DC Council Member Mary Cheh ( D-Ward 3 ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the main reason why she wants to remove parents from the process of vaccinating children .
Advocating for passage of her bill , she stated : “ And given our ongoing pandemic and the incredible work being done to develop a COVID-19 vaccine , it ’ s more important than ever I think that we reduce any and all barriers to these treatments and this legislation aims to do just that by increasing access to vaccines for minors who choose to get vaccinated but have not been able to do so.
” 12 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ clear that minor children will be at risk of being pressured and coerced into getting a COVID-19 vaccine behind their parents ’ back once it is available and added by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices ( ACIP ) to the childhood vaccine schedule recommended by the U , S .
Centers for Disease Control ( CDC ) .
Violation of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and Parental Rights B23-0171 permits minor children 11 years and older to consent to any vaccine recommended by ACIP without a parent ’ s knowledge or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Federal legislative history provides evidence that Congress never intended for a minor child to make decisions to get a vaccine without parents ’ knowledge or consent .
When the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 198613 was passed , the Act clearly stated that before the administration of vaccines14 to a child , a health care provider shall give a copy of the CDC ’ s vaccine information materials to the , “ parent or legal representative of any child to whom the provider intends to administer such vaccine… ” The CDC confirms @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Vaccine Information Statement ( VIS ) is provided to the parent/legal guardian prior to vaccination of a minor child on their VIS Q & A page.15 Under the question , “ Is there a requirement to verify that parents/legal representatives have actually received and reviewed the VIS , ” the answer is a clear “ YES ” .
These requirements under federal law for a parent to be educated with CDC materials prior to their minor child being vaccinated will not be met if a child is allowed to make these decisions on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Court has recognized the right of parents to be an active and integral part of their children ’ s lives as “ perhaps the oldest of the fundamental liberty interests recognized by [ the Supreme ] Court.
” Troxel v. Granville , 530 U.S. 57 ( U.S. 2000 ) 16 B23-0171 Endangers the Health and Well Being of Children A minor child is far less likely than an adult parent to understand personal and family medical history , including vaccine reactions , allergies , and autoimmune or neurological disorders .
Children do not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ skills or emotional maturity required to make a well-informed vaccine benefit-risk decision compared to an adult .
Vaccines can cause injury and death as evidenced by the creation of a federally operated Vaccine Injury Compensation Program ( VICP ) , which has paid out over $ 4.4 billion dollars to vaccine victims.17 If a child consents to vaccination without their parent knowledge and has a reaction , the parent may not recognize vaccine reaction symptoms and the reason for their child ’ s sudden personality change and decline in physical , mental or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ knowledge could be life threatening for the child .
The parent ’ s lack of knowledge about the fact that their child was given vaccines that carry a risk of injury or death may well prevent the parent from seeking immediate medical care .
Under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act18 Congress gave partial liability protection to vaccine manufacturers in 1986 and then added an amendment giving vaccine administrators liability protection from vaccine injury lawsuits in 1987 .
In 2011 , the U.S. Supreme Court judges in Bruesewitz et al v. Wyeth et @ @ @ @ @ @ @ childhood vaccines were “ unavoidably unsafe ” and effectively removed all remaining liability from vaccine manufacturers .
Today , pharmaceutical companies making and selling vaccines and doctors and other vaccine administrators have no legal accountability or financial liability in civil court when a mandated vaccine causes permanent injury or death .
There is no justification for the state to eliminate a parent ’ s legal and moral right to make an informed benefit and risk decision about vaccination on behalf of a minor child , especially when doctors and other vaccine providers have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the child after vaccination .
B23-0171 compels schools ( bill lines 52-54 ) to conceal vaccine administration from parents , whose children give consent to receive vaccinations on their own , even when their parents have already declined one or more vaccines for health risk reasons or have filed a religious vaccine exemption .
FERPA , 34 CFR § 99.1021 , guarantees parents the right to have access to their children ’ s education records .
The definition of “ education records ” include health and vaccine records at the K-12 level22 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ access to their child ’ s vaccination status , the bill does permit schools to share the child ’ s vaccination record with the DC Department of Health or the school-based health center ( bill lines 53-54 ) .
This is also in conflict with FERPA because 34 CFR §99.30 requires prior written parental consent before personally identifiable information ( PII ) is disclosed to others and requires schools to provide copies of those records disclosed.23 While FERPA does allow for release of PII under the health and safety emergency exception , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ student is extremely limited.24 “ The immunization requirements subject to this Chapter , shall not apply to any student whose parent or guardian objects in writing to the immunization on grounds that the medical treatment or medical test is forbidden by their religion or religious beliefs and practices25.
” Granting vaccine providers the ability to vaccinate children in the absence of parental consent conflicts with the already codified religious exemption rights of parents .
There are other serious legal issues creating the potential for criminal violations and civil liability lawsuits : the bill @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the fact that the child was vaccinated and it requires the falsification of official medical records by vaccine administrators .
The bill ( lines 37-41 ) requires providers to seek reimbursement from the parent ’ s insurance company but prohibits insurers from sending an Explanation of Benefits .
Lines 48-52 requires a health care provider to leave part of the immunization record blank concealing from the parent the fact that their own child was given vaccines .
DC Vaccine Bill Part of the Dangerous Agenda To Remove Parents From Vaccination Decisions for Minor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Feb. 2726 and Mar .
5 , 2019.27 The hearings , which focused on vaccine hesitancy , pitted children against their parents .
Veteran vaccine safety and informed consent advocates with decades of experience , including time spent serving as consumer representatives on federal advisory committees , were denied the ability to testify .
However , a teenager , who had no expertise in the area of vaccine safety and law and whose only experience related to the subject being discussed was recently criticizing his mother on social media28 for not vaccinating him @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hearing , the mainstream media published multiple similar articles promoting the ill-conceived concept of doctors being given the power to convince minor children to receive vaccines without their parents ’ consent , often quoting the teen ’ s testimony as justification for why parents should be cut out of the vaccination process for their minor children.30 Medical trade groups representing liability-free vaccine administrators also endorsed the concept of giving children liability free vaccines without parental consent .
Doctors , who are frustrated with having to spend time talking with educated parents about vaccines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ way to coerce children into consenting to vaccines on their own .
Pre-adolescents and teenagers are vulnerable to peer and authority-figure persuasion .
An opinion piece expressing support for removing parental informed consent rights was published in the New England Journal of Medicine , 31 and the American Medical Association passed a resolution supporting state laws to allow minors to consent to vaccination.32 This coordinated effort resulted in 13 minor consent bills being introduced in state legislatures in 2019 , and there was a big jump to 21 similar bills being introduced in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rejected a total of 33 minor consent bills filed in 2019 and 2020 .
The DC minor consent bill in is the only one moving.33 What Happens if the Bill Passes on November 10th ?
If the bill passes a second reading in the City Council , it goes to the DC Mayor Muriel Bowser , who has up to 10 days to sign the bill , let it go into effect without her signature , or veto it .
If Mayor Bowser vetoes the bill , the City Council can override the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ final step before becoming law is the bill must be sent to the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate for a period of 30 days before becoming effective as law .
During this period of review , the U.S. Congress may enact into law a joint resolution disapproving and negating the legislation .
If , during the review period , the President of the United States approves a joint resolution by Congress disapproving the DC legislation , it will be prevented from becoming law .
If , however , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ period , no joint resolution disapproving the Council ’ s Act has been approved by the President , the bill finally becomes a law and is assigned a law number.34 Litigation is also likely if the DC Council passes B23-0171 .
In an Oct. 21 , 2020 update by ParentalRights.org , “ DC Council Would Discard Constitution , End Parents ’ Rights , ” Executive Director Michael Ramey asserts this bill is contrary to the U.S. Constitution and lays out existing U.S. Supreme Court precedent to back this up .
He says , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Supreme Court precedent has held that parents have both the duty and the right to direct the care , custody , and control of their minor children.
” 35 What Can People Do To Help Defeat This Legislation ?
Families living or sending their children to school in the District of Columbia should contact all thirteen members of the DC Council36 and tell them to Vote NO on B23-0171 in the second and final reading .
Specific directions , talking points , and contact information is published in the alert on the NVIC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get this information to people they know in DC .
NVIC anticipates that there will be similar minor consent bills filed in other states in 2021 .
Registered users of the free online NVIC Advocacy Portal will receive action alerts with talking points when vaccine related bills like this one are introduced in 2021 so they can take action in their own states to protect their informed consent rights .
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices , American Medical Association , B23-0171 , Bruesewitz et al v. Wyeth et al , CDC , Centers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , COVID-19 , Dawn Richardson , District of Columbia Council , Mary Cheh , National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 , National Vaccine Information Center , New England Journal of Medicine , NVIC , NVIC Advocacy Portal , personally identifiable information , PII , The Vaccine Reactin , The Vaccine Reaction , The Washington Post , Troxel v. Granville , Vaccine Information Statement , Vincent C. Gray , VIS

Jessica Yaniv filed human rights complaints against fifteen female beauticians for refusing to wax her penis and balls.
A trans activist who gained notoriety for attempting to force beauticians to wax their balls and penis is now arranging a swimming session for girls as young as 12 where parents will not be allowed to be present.
Yes, really.
Jessica Yaniv, who was born a man, has filed complaints with the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal against fifteen female aestheticians for their refusal to wax her male genitalia.
The controversy prompted comedian Ricky Gervais to wade into the debate.
“How did we get to the point where women are having to fight for the right to choose whether they wax some big old hairy cock & balls or not? It is not a human right to have your meat & 2 veg polished,” tweeted Gervais, who was accused of “transphobia” for defending a woman’s right not to wax male genitalia.
How did we get to the point where women are having to fight for the right to choose whether they wax some big old hairy cock & balls or not? It is not a human right to have your meat & 2 veg polished. — Ricky Gervais (@rickygervais) July 21, 2019
But the situation gets even more bizarre.
Yaniv has now organized a “youth all bodies swim” event at the Al Anderson Memorial Pool in Langley, British Columbia. The promotional material for the event states, “Parents and/or caregivers are not permitted in the event”.
Couldn’t believe this was real at first… The trans activist demanding beauticians wax balls also tried hosting a swimming event… …inviting 12 year old girls to swim topless where parents would be barred from attending. pic.twitter.com/VJVHt1imK8 — Steven Crowder (@scrowder) July 22, 2019
This has caused widespread concern because Yaniv previously made comments described by some as “perverted” about naked girls getting changed in locker rooms.
“If there’s like 30 girls in the change rooms, how many of them would you say are out there changing freely with their vaginas and tits out?” asked Yaniv in one post.
In a girls bathroom. Read the caption. That’s the commenfary of this predator Twitter and Facebook say this is fine pic.twitter.com/yf2cCThnoI — ThunderB, Hineni (@ThunderB) July 20, 2019
“Went really well,” states another post. “I expected more though. I only saw one girl in her panties.”
“I was really expecting to walk in and see girls with their boobs out,” comments Yaniv in another post.
Other posts repeatedly show Yaniv asking girls how young they are as well as other disturbing posts such as one which states, “Have you ever seen a tampon string hanging out of another girls thing?”
Last week, Yaniv also celebrated getting free speech activist Lindsay Shepherd banned by Twitter after Shepherd suggested Yaniv was not a woman.
pic.twitter.com/6yrBFP4ZpO Time to throw a party! Hatred has no place in this world. Bye Felicia! #LGBTQ — Jessica Yaniv (@trustednerd) July 15, 2019
Clown world never fails to deliver the insanity, but this is perhaps the clearest example of someone hiding behind a ‘protected identity’ to engage in what critics assert is predatory behavior.
Reference: Summit.news


humansarefree--2020-10-29--Bill Gates, Who is NOT an Elected Official, is Part of the Stimulus Negotiations

As the U.S. Congress debates a second , but stalled , stimulus bill to help Americans hurt by the pandemic @ @ @ @ @ is playing a role in the negotiations : none other than Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates @ @ @ @ @ wonder why Gates , who isn ’ t an elected official , would have anything @ @ @ @ @ , you ’ re probably not alone .
But he is , and he told @ @ @ @ @ ’ s All Market Summit virtual event that he is working to get billions of @ @ @ @ @ package to give to Gavi , the Vaccine Alliance .
If he ’ s successful @ @ @ @ @ go to struggling Americans but , rather , outside of America for vaccines in developing @ @ @ @ @ he wants “ billions ” for Gavi , evidently beyond the $ 1.6 billion that @ @ @ @ @ pledged to Gavi for the fiscal years 2020-2023 .

As the U.S. Congress debates a second, but stalled, stimulus bill to help Americans hurt by the pandemic shutdowns, one odd figure is playing a role in the negotiations: none other than Microsoft billionaire Billy Boy.
If it makes you wonder why Gates, who isn’t an elected official, would have anything to do with the stimulus, you’re probably not alone.
But he is, and he told Andy Serwer of Yahoo Finance’s All Market Summit virtual event that he is working to get billions of dollars added into the stimulus package to give to Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance.
If he’s successful, that money would not go to struggling Americans but, rather, outside of America for jjabs in developing countries.
Gates admitted that he wants “billions” for Gavi, evidently beyond the $1.6 billion that the current administration has already pledged to Gavi for the fiscal years 2020-2023.
Reference: Blogs.Mercola.com


humansarefree--2020-10-30--The Osirion Temple and the Flower of Life: An Archaeological Nightmare

Located in Abydos , modern-day Egypt we find a number of incredible structures .
Among them is the so-called Osirion or Osireon an ancient Egyptian temple located to the rear of the temple of Seti I .
It is located in the extension of the longitudinal axis of the temple of Seti I and was made with limestone , reddish sandstone , and granite .
The temple was discovered in 1902 by Flinders Petrie and Margaret Murray who were excavating the Temple of Seti I .
The entire site was uncovered in 1926 .
Mainstream archaeologists place the temple to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ structure consists of a vaulted corridor , which , starting from the temple of Seti I , reaches the antechamber , a short passage that connects with the great central chamber , and the last chamber , parallel to the antechamber .
The building typology , its elements and the materials used ( granite ) are similar to the temple of the valley of the pyramid of Khafre , in Giza , so some scholars have suggested that it may be a copy or a previous building that was reused .
The Osirion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Osiris , while the temple of Seti is known as the temple of Osiris .
Abydos was the main site of the worship of Osiris .
The Osirion is fascinating for a number of reasons .
It ’ s extremely difficult to access the interior , due to flooding caused by the rise of the phreatic level of the underground water layer .
The Osirion , unlike any other temples at Abydos , was constructed at a lower depth than structures nearby .
It also features a completely different architectural approach .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it would have made its construction impossible had the water have been the same at the time it was erected .
Furthermore , according to Strabo — a Greek geographer , philosopher , and historian — who traveled to the Osirion in the first century BC said that it was built by Ismandes , or Mandes ( Amenemhet III ) , the same builder as the Labyrinth at Hawara .
“ Above this city [ Ptolemaïs ] lies Abydus , where is the Memnonium , a royal building , which is a remarkable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the same workmanship as that which I ascribed to the Labyrinth , though not multiplex ; and also , a fountain which lies at a great depth , so that one descends to it down vaulted galleries made of monoliths of surprising size and workmanship.
” Many believe that this temple was not the work of the Egyptians.
, but rather an ancient site they found and built their temples around it and continued worshiping it for millennia .
There are theories that suggest that when the temple was built , it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that during thousands of years that would follow , sediments started piling up eventually covering the temple entirely .
This theory would suggest the Osirion as not built by the ancient Egyptians as mainstream scholars put forth , but by a civilization that predates them .
More curious details are revealed if we decide to compare the architecture of that period , and the Temple of Seti I , you see the difference clearly .
It ’ s as if the Osirion is a temple out of place and time .
This is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ against the conventional dating of this structure is the architectural context .
The new architecture of the ancient Egyptians is incredibly different in its style and form , and although each temple of the new kingdom is unique , there is a multiplicity of stylistic coherence between their designs .
Curiously , the Osirion does not exhibit any of these traits .
Furthermore , there is an absence of inscriptions on the site , and it seems that the construction with megaliths is unique to the architecture of the new kingdom , not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that Seti built his temple on one level , and the Osirion a few meters deeper into the ground .
The Flower of Life at the Osirion Another fascinating feature we found at the Osirion is the Flower of Life .
The shape was not painted but was engraved in the rock .
This means that even though so scratch of a piece the curious symbols remains .
It is carved a few centimeters into the rock .
There are those who dare to say that the symbol seems as if it was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Of course , there isn ’ t actually evidence to support this claim , other than the fact that ‘ it looks like that ’ .

Located in Abydos, modern-day Egypt we find a number of incredible structures. Among them is the so-called Osirion or Osireon an ancient Egyptian temple located to the rear of the temple of Seti I.
It is located in the extension of the longitudinal axis of the temple of Seti I and was made with limestone, reddish sandstone, and granite.
The temple was discovered in 1902 by Flinders Petrie and Margaret Murray who were excavating the Temple of Seti I.
The entire site was uncovered in 1926. Mainstream archaeologists place the temple to the reign of Set I.
Its structure consists of a vaulted corridor, which, starting from the temple of Seti I, reaches the antechamber, a short passage that connects with the great central chamber, and the last chamber, parallel to the antechamber.
The building typology, its elements and the materials used (granite) are similar to the temple of the valley of the pyramid of Khafre, in Giza, so some scholars have suggested that it may be a copy or a previous building that was reused.
The Osirion is also known as the tomb of Osiris, while the temple of Seti is known as the temple of Osiris. Abydos was the main site of the worship of Osiris.
The Osirion is fascinating for a number of reasons.
It’s extremely difficult to access the interior, due to flooding caused by the rise of the phreatic level of the underground water layer.
The Osirion, unlike any other temples at Abydos, was constructed at a lower depth than structures nearby. It also features a completely different architectural approach.
The fact that is frequently flooded means that it would have made its construction impossible had the water have been the same at the time it was erected.
This raises a number of problems.
Furthermore, according to Strabo — a Greek geographer, philosopher, and historian — who traveled to the Osirion in the first century BC said that it was built by Ismandes, or Mandes (Amenemhet III), the same builder as the Labyrinth at Hawara.
“Above this city [Ptolemaïs] lies Abydus, where is the Memnonium, a royal building, which is a remarkable structure built of solid stone, and of the same workmanship as that which I ascribed to the Labyrinth, though not multiplex; and also, a fountain which lies at a great depth, so that one descends to it down vaulted galleries made of monoliths of surprising size and workmanship.”
Many believe that this temple was not the work of the Egyptians., but rather an ancient site they found and built their temples around it and continued worshiping it for millennia.
There are theories that suggest that when the temple was built, it was not located beneath the soil and that during thousands of years that would follow, sediments started piling up eventually covering the temple entirely.
This theory would suggest the Osirion as not built by the ancient Egyptians as mainstream scholars put forth, but by a civilization that predates them.
More curious details are revealed if we decide to compare the architecture of that period, and the Temple of Seti I, you see the difference clearly.
It’s as if the Osirion is a temple out of place and time.
This is why perhaps the biggest reason that goes against the conventional dating of this structure is the architectural context.
The new architecture of the ancient Egyptians is incredibly different in its style and form, and although each temple of the new kingdom is unique, there is a multiplicity of stylistic coherence between their designs.
Curiously, the Osirion does not exhibit any of these traits.
Furthermore, there is an absence of inscriptions on the site, and it seems that the construction with megaliths is unique to the architecture of the new kingdom, not to mention that tt seems almost absurd that Seti built his temple on one level, and the Osirion a few meters deeper into the ground.
The Flower of Life at the Osirion
Another fascinating feature we found at the Osirion is the Flower of Life.
The shape was not painted but was engraved in the rock. This means that even though so scratch of a piece the curious symbols remains. It is carved a few centimeters into the rock.
There are those who dare to say that the symbol seems as if it was engraved with some sort of laser.
Of course, there isn’t actually evidence to support this claim, other than the fact that ‘it looks like that’.
Reference: Ancient-code.com


humansarefree--2020-10-30--Big Tech Google & Oracle to Monitor Americans Who Get COVID-19 Vaccine

Last week , a rare media interview given by the Trump administration ’ s “ Vaccine Czar ” offered a brief glimpse into the inner workings of the extremely secretive Operation Warp Speed ( OWS ) , the Trump administration ’ s “ public-private partnership ” for delivering a COVID-19 vaccine to 300 million Americans by next January .
What was revealed should deeply unsettle all Americans .
During an interview with the Wall Street Journal published last Friday , the “ captain ” of OWS , career Big Pharma executive Moncef Slaoui , confirmed that the millions of Americans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s COVID-19 vaccine will be monitored via “ incredibly precise … tracking systems ” that will “ ensure that patients each get two doses of the same vaccine and to monitor them for adverse health effects.
” Slaoui also noted that tech giants Google and Oracle have been contracted as part of this “ tracking system ” but did not specify their exact roles beyond helping to “ collect and track vaccine data.
” The day before the Wall Street Journal interview was published , the New York Times published a separate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this “ tracking system ” as a “ very active pharmacovigilance surveillance system.
” During a previous interview with the journal Science in early September , Slaoui had referred to this system only as “ a very active pharmacovigilance system ” that would “ make sure that when the vaccines are introduced that we ’ ll absolutely continue to assess their safety.
” Slaoui has only recently tacked on the words “ tracking ” and “ surveillance ” to his description of this system during his relatively rare media interviews .
While Slaoui @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ pharmacovigilance surveillance system , ” the few official documents from OWS that have been publicly released offer some details about what this system may look like and how long it is expected to “ track ” the vital signs and whereabouts of Americans who receive a Warp Speed vaccine .
Two official OWS documents released in mid-September state that vaccine recipients — expected to include a majority of the U.S. population — would be monitored for twenty-four months after the first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine is administered and that this would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” In the OWS document entitled “ From the Factory to the Frontlines , ” the Department of Health and Human Services ( HHS ) and the Department of Defense ( DOD ) stated that , because Warp Speed vaccine candidates use new unlicensed vaccine production methods that “ have limited previous data on safety in humans … the long-term safety of these vaccines will be carefully assessed using pharmacovigilance surveillance and Phase 4 ( post-licensure ) clinical trials.
” The key objective of pharmacovigilance is to determine each vaccine ’ s performance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and to discover any infrequent and rare side effects not identified in clinical trials .
OWS will also use pharmacovigilance analytics , which serves as one of the instruments for the continuous monitoring of pharmacovigilance data .
Robust analytical tools will be used to leverage large amounts of data and the benefits of using such data across the value chain , including regulatory obligations .
In addition , Moncef Slaoui and OWS ’ s vaccine coordinator , Matt Hepburn , formerly a program manager at the Pentagon ’ s controversial Defense Advanced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an article in the New England Journal of Medicine that stated that “ because some technologies have limited previous data on safety in humans , the long-term safety of these vaccines will be carefully assessed using pharmacovigilance surveillance strategies.
” The use of pharmacovigilance on those who receive the vaccine is also mentioned in the official Warp Speed “ infographic , ” which states that monitoring will be done in cooperation with the Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) and the Centers for Disease Control and Protection ( CDC ) and will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ adverse effects.
” In a separate part of that same document , OWS describes one of its “ four key tenets ” as “ traceability , ” which has three goals : to “ confirm which of the approved vaccines were administered regardless of location ( private/public ) ” ; to send a “ reminder to return for second dose ” ; and to “ administer the correct second dose.
” Regarding a COVID-19 vaccine requiring more than one dose , a CDC document associated with OWS states : For most COVID-19 vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ separated by 21 or 28 days , will be needed .
Because different COVID-19 vaccine products will not be interchangeable , a vaccine recipient ’ s second dose must be from the same manufacturer as their first dose .
Second-dose reminders for vaccine recipients will be critical to ensure compliance with vaccine dosing intervals and achieve optimal vaccine effectiveness .
The CDC document also references a document published in August by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security , associated with the Event 201 and Dark Winter simulations , as informing its COVID-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which counts Dark Winter co-organizer Thomas Inglesby as one of its authors , argues that existing “ passive reporting ” systems managed by the CDC and FDA should be retooled to create “ an active safety surveillance system directed by the CDC that monitors all [ COVID-19 ] vaccine recipients — perhaps by short message service or other electronic mechanisms.
” Despite the claims in these documents that the “ pharmacovigilance surveillance system ” would intimately involve the FDA , top FDA officials stated in September that they were barred from attending @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not explain the operation ’ s organization or when or with what frequency its leadership meets .
The FDA officials did state , however , that they “ are still allowed to interact with companies developing products for OWS , ” STAT reported .
In addition , the FDA has apparently “ set up a firewall between the vast majority of staff and the initiative [ Operation Warp Speed ] ” that appears to drastically limit the number of FDA officials with any knowledge of or involvement in Warp Speed .
The FDA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Drug Evaluation and Research , Janet Woodcock , is the only FDA official listed as having any direct involvement in OWS and appears to be personally managing this “ firewall ” at the FDA .
Woodcock describes herself as a long-time advocate for the use of “ big data ” in the evaluation of drug and vaccine safety and has been intimately involved in FDA precursors to the coming Warp Speed “ pharmacovigilance surveillance system ” known as Sentinel and PRISM , both of which are discussed later in this report .
Woodcock @ @ @ @ @ @ @ absence from her role as the director of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research , which allows her to focus her complete attention on overseeing aspects of OWS on behalf of the FDA ’ s Office of the Commissioner .
Her temporary replacement at the FDA , Patrizia Cavazzoni , is “ very aligned with Janet and where the agency is going , ” according to media reports .
Cavazzoni is a former executive at Pfizer , one of the companies producing a vaccine for OWS .
That vaccine is set to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 12 years old .
The extreme secrecy of OWS has affected not only the FDA but also the CDC , as a CDC expert panel normally involved in developing the government ’ s vaccine distribution strategies was “ stonewalled ” by Matt Hepburn , OWS ’ s vaccine coordinator , who bluntly refused to answer several of the panel ’ s “ pointed questions ” about the highly secretive operation .
While Moncef Slaoui and Warp Speed documents provide few details regarding what this “ tracking system ” would entail , Slaoui did @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wall Street Journal that tech giants Google and Oracle had been contracted to “ collect and track vaccine data ” as part of this system .
Neither Google nor Oracle , however , has announced receipt of a contract related to OWS , and the DOD and HHS , similarly , have yet to announce the awarding of any Warp Speed contract to either Google or Oracle .
In addition , searches on the U.S. government ’ s Federal Register and on the official website for federally awarded contracts came up empty for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that would apply to any such “ pharmacovigilance ” system or any other aspect of Operation Warp Speed .
Given my previous reporting on the use of a nongovernment intermediary for awarding OWS contracts to vaccine companies , it seems likely that Warp Speed contracts awarded to Google and Oracle were made using a similar mechanism .
In an Oct. 6 report for The Last American Vagabond , I noted that $ 6 billion in Warp Speed contracts awarded to vaccine companies were made through Advanced Technology International ( ATI ) , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ military and surveillance technology companies and whose parent company has strong ties to the CIA and the 2001 Dark Winter simulation .
HHS , which is supposedly overseeing OWS , claimed to have “ no record ” of at least one of those contracts .
Only one Warp Speed vaccine contract , which did not involve ATI and was awarded directly by HHS ’ s Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority , was recently obtained by KEI Online .
Major parts of the contract , however , including the section on intellectual property @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
If the Warp Speed contracts that have been awarded to Google and Oracle are anything like the Warp Speed contracts awarded to most of its participating vaccine companies , then those contracts grant those companies diminished federal oversight and exemptions from federal laws and regulations designed to protect taxpayer interests in the pursuit of the work stipulated in the contract .
It also makes them essentially immune to Freedom of Information Act requests .
Yet , in contrast to the unacknowledged Google and Oracle contracts , vaccine companies have publicly disclosed that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the terms or details of those contracts .
This suggests that the Google and Oracle contracts are even more secretive .
A major conflict of interest worth noting is Google ’ s ownership of YouTube , which recently banned on its massive multimedia platform all “ misinformation ” related to concerns about a future COVID-19 vaccine .
With Google now formally part of OWS , it seems likely that any concerns about OWS ’ s extreme secrecy and the conflicts of interest of many of its members ( particularly Moncef Slaoui and Matt @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about Warp Speed vaccine safety , allocation and/or distribution may be labeled “ COVID-19 vaccine misinformation ” and removed from YouTube .
From the NSA to the FDA : the new PRISM Though the nature of this coming surveillance system for COVID-19 vaccine recipients has yet to be fully detailed by Warp Speed or the tech companies the operation has contracted , OWS documents and existing infrastructure at the FDA offer a clue as to what this system could entail .
For instance , the Warp Speed document “ From the Factory to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ system will be a new system created exclusively for OWS that will be “ buil [ t ] off of existing IT [ information technology ] infrastructure ” and will fill any “ gaps with new IT solutions.
” It then notes that “ the COVID-19 vaccination program requires significant enhancement of the IT that will support enhancements and data exchange that are critical for a multi-dose candidate to ensure proper administration of a potential second dose.
” The document also states that all data related to the OWS vaccine distribution effort “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ infrastructure that will support analysis and reporting , ” adding that this “ IT infrastructure will support partners with a broad range of tools for record-keeping , data on who is being vaccinated , and reminders for second doses.
” Though some Warp Speed documents hint as to the existing IT systems that will serve as the foundation for this new tracking system , arguably the most likely candidate is the FDA-managed Sentinel Initiative , which was established in 2009 during the H1N1 Swine flu pandemic .
Like OWS itself , Sentinel is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , private business , and academia .
According to its website , Sentinel ’ s “ main goal is to improve how FDA evaluates the safety and performance of medical products ” through big data , with an additional focus on “ learning more about potential side effects.
” Media reports describe Sentinel as “ an electronic surveillance system that aggregates data from electronic medical records , claims and registries that voluntarily participate and allows the agency to track the safety of marketed drugs , biologics and medical devices.
” One of Sentinel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is Janet Woodcock , who has aggressively worked to expand the program as director of the FDA ’ s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research , with a focus on Sentinel ’ s use in “ post-market effectiveness studies.
” As previously mentioned , Woodcock is the only FDA official listed among the ninety or so “ leaders ” of OWS , most of whom are part of the U.S. military and lack any health-care or vaccine-production experience .
Woodcock ’ s temporary replacement at the FDA , Patrizia Cavazzoni , is also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
STAT reported earlier this year that Cavazzoni previously “ served on the sterling committee of I-MEDS , an FDA-industry partnership which allows drug makers to pay for use of the FDA ’ s real-world data system known as Sentinel to complete certain safety studies more quickly.
” Sentinel has a series of “ collaborating partners ” that “ provide healthcare data and scientific , technical , and organizational expertise ” to the initiative .
These collaborating partners include intelligence contractor Booz Allen Hamilton , tech giant IBM , and major U.S. health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Cross Blue Shield , among many others .
In addition , Sentinel ’ s Innovation Center , which it describes as the program ’ s “ test bed to identify , develop , and evaluate innovative methods , ” is partnered with Amazon , General Dynamics , and Microsoft .
Sentinel also has a Community Building and Outreach Center , which is managed by Deloitte consulting , one of the largest consultancy firms in the world that is known for seeking to fill its ranks with former CIA officials .
The Sentinel system @ @ @ @ @ @ @ monitoring vaccine effectiveness is known as the Post-licensure Rapid Immunization Safety Monitoring Program , better known as PRISM .
Sentinel ’ s PRISM was “ developed to monitor vaccine safety , but [ to date ] has never been used to assess vaccine effectiveness.
” PRISM was initially launched alongside the Sentinel Initiative itself in 2009 “ in response to the need to monitor the safety of the H1N1 influenza vaccine ” after it was licensed , marketed , and administered .
Yet , as previously mentioned , PRISM has yet to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine while quietly expanding for nearly a decade , which implies that the stakeholders in the Sentinel Initiative have a plan to implement this “ safety surveillance system ” at some point .
The name PRISM may remind readers of the National Security Agency ( NSA ) program of the same name that became well known throughout the United States following the Edward Snowden revelations .
Given this association , it is worth noting that the NSA , as well as the Department of Homeland Security ( DHS ) , are now officially @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be playing a role in the development of Warp Speed ’ s “ pharmacovigilance surveillance system.
” The addition of the NSA and the DHS to the initiative , of course , greatly increases the involvement of U.S. intelligence agencies in the operation , which itself is “ dominated ” by the military and sorely lacking in civilian public health officials .
CyberScoop first reported in early September that members of the NSA ’ s Cybersecurity Directorate were involved in OWS , with their role — as well as that of DHS @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cybersecurity advice ” to the initiative .
However , the NSA and DHS are also offering “ guidance ” and “ services ” to both the other federal agencies involved in Warp Speed as well as OWS contractors , which now include Google and Oracle .
Google is well known for its cozy relationship with the NSA , including its PRISM program , and they have also backed NSA-supported legislation that would make it easier to surveil Americans without a warrant .
Similarly , Oracle is a longtime NSA contractor and also has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its earliest days as a company , not unlike Google .
Notably , Oracle and Google remain locked in a major legal battle over copyright issues that is set to be heard by the Supreme Court in the coming weeks and is expected to have major ramifications for the tech industry .
In the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks , the U.S. military attempted to institute a surveillance program so invasive that Congress defunded it just months after its creation due to public outrage .
Known as Total Information Awareness ( TIA ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all-seeing surveillance apparatus managed by the Pentagon ’ s DARPA and officially argued that invasive surveillance of the entire U.S. population was necessary to prevent terrorist attacks , bioterrorism events , and even naturally occurring disease outbreaks before they could take place .
Before it was disbanded , TIA sought to collect Americans ’ medical records ; fingerprints ; gait , facial , and iris biometric data ; drug prescriptions ; and even DNA in addition to citizens ’ financial , travel , and media-consumption habits .
TIA , not unlike OWS , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the DOD and partnered with the NSA , the CIA , and other intelligence agencies as well as the private sector and academia .
Also like Warp Speed , TIA officially justified its invasive surveillance goals by claiming that its initiatives would rescue Americans from the “ invisible enemy ” of faceless terrorists abroad and ensure citizens ’ safety , security , and health .
Today , Warp Speed officially takes aim at a new type of “ invisible enemy ” — a microbe invisible to the naked human eye .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pushback against TIA was fierce .
The American Civil Liberties Union ( ACLU ) claimed at the time that the surveillance effort would “ kill privacy in America ” because “ every aspect of our lives would be catalogued , ” while mainstream media outlets warned that TIA was “ fighting terror by terrifying U.S. citizens.
” Despite Congress officially defunding the program , it later emerged that TIA was never actually shut down , with its various programs having been covertly divided among the web of military and intelligence agencies that comprise @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in years past , TIA ’ s apparent successor , OWS , has received no pushback from mainstream media outlets or advocacy organizations , with many of these same entities now placing blind faith in the secretive initiative and lionizing it as the “ only way ” to resolve the COVID-19 pandemic crisis .
The national security state has carefully learned from and studied its past failures , while many Americans , in contrast , continue to place their trust in the very agencies and government entities that have lied the country into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ civilians abroad , produced a series of failed states in order to plunder their resources , and are currently facilitating the pillaging of the American economy by Wall Street and the Federal Reserve under the guise of “ relief.
” Allowing these same entities to surveil and track a majority of Americans and to use the country ’ s population as guinea pigs for unlicensed , understudied , and experimental vaccine technologies is a clear recipe for disaster .
At the same time , it would also enable a surveillance panopticon so dystopian @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lose not only their few remaining civil liberties but even sovereignty over their own bodies .
The total-surveillance agenda that began with TIA and that has been resurrected through Warp Speed predated COVID-19 by decades .
Its architects and proponents have worked to justify these extreme and invasive surveillance programs by marketing this agenda as the “ solution ” to whatever Americans are most afraid of at any given time .
It has very little to do with “ public health ” and everything to do with total control .

As material from dystopian novels such as 1984 begins to become a reality, we are witnessing the accelerated rollout of an agenda, which is leading towards a predetermined future.
In this interview Spiro is joined by Richie Allen, a journalist, producer and the host of the Richie Allen Radio Show.
In this interview, Richie Allen shares information regarding contacts who he has been in touch with currently working for Google.
According to the unnamed source or sources, Google, Facebook and Twitter are coordinating with each other to carry out a multi-platform purge of accounts that question jjab safety.
The potential purge is said to coincide with the rollout of the new, experimental COVID-19 jjab.
By Spiro Skouras


humansarefree--2020-10-30--Denisovan DNA Discovered in a Tibetan Cave May Be Only 45,000 Years Old – They Lived Alongside Moder

Denisovan DNA Discovered in a Tibetan Cave May Be Only 45,000 Years Old – They Lived Alongside Modern Humans!

DNA belonging to Denisovans – the ancient human ancestor – discovered in a Tibetan cave may be only 45,000 years @ @ @ @ @ The ancient Denisovan mitochondrial DNA was recovered in sediments from Baishiya Karst Cave , a @ @ @ @ @ margin of the Tibetan Plateau , 3,280 meters above sea level .
Samples indicate Denisovans @ @ @ @ @ around 100,000 to 60,000 years ago , and also possibly as recently as 45,000 years @ @ @ @ @ is indeed only 45,000 years old , the species would have lived alongside modern humans @ @ @ @ @ It is exactly what I explained in THIS ARTICLE .

DNA belonging to Denisovans – the ancient human ancestor – discovered in a Tibetan cave may be only 45,000 years old, scientists say.
The ancient Denisovan mitochondrial DNA was recovered in sediments from Baishiya Karst Cave, a limestone cave at the northeast margin of the Tibetan Plateau, 3,280 meters above sea level.
Samples indicate Denisovans occupied the high-altitude cave from around 100,000 to 60,000 years ago, and also possibly as recently as 45,000 years ago.
If the DNA is indeed only 45,000 years old, the species would have lived alongside modern humans in northeast central Asia.
Source: Dailymail.co.uk
It is exactly what I explained in THIS ARTICLE.


humansarefree--2020-10-30--Paul Craig Roberts: The Democrats and the Presstitutes Will Not Admit a Trump Win

The Plot Against the President If Trump wins the election , unless it is an overwhelming victory that can not be challenged , the Democrats and the American media will not admit that Trump won .
The plan in place is to blame Trump ’ s win on fraud and to use the tactics of the “ Maidan Revolution ” in Ukraine , recently employed again in Belarus , to prevent Trump ’ s inauguration .
The documentary , The Plot Against the President , explains the “ Russiagate ” plot by the FBI , the Democrats , and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The venality and corruption of FBI Director Comey , the American media , and Democrats , such as Adam Schiff , is scary .
That such an obvious plot against American democracy involving the country ’ s security agencies and one of the two ruling political parties could go on for three years without a single question by the media proves that the Establishment will not tolerate a non-establishment President or those who support him and that the media dares not cross the Establishment .
The fact that Comey is not in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Deep State .
Had it not been for US Rep. Devin Nunes of the House Intelligence Committee the coup would have succeeded .
The coup attempt is not over .
The documentary , which consists of the testimony of members of the House Intelligence Committee , National Security officials , and outside experts , shows that both Democrats , especially Adam Schiff , and the US media simply denied that Independent Prosecutor Mueller and the House Intelligence Committee failed to find any evidence of the Russiagate charges .
Adam Schiff stood before the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ again .
The media knew he was lying and never called him on his lies .
Not even once .
The undeniable fact that Russiagate was a three-year hoax , an orchestrated deception to foreclose the Trump agenda , has not been admitted by Democrats or the presstitutes .
In other words , nothing is true unless the media admits it .
And they don ’ t admit the truth .
The Elite use the presstitutes to control the explanations and to keep the population in a false reality .
As our Founding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ independent media , there is no liberty .
The United States does not have a free and independent media .
It has a propaganda ministry for the ruling Elite .
Be sure you comprehend the implications , because you are about to see it again .
If Trump wins the election , the media and the Democrat Party are not going to acknowledge the fact that Trump won – unless Trump ’ s win is so overwhelming that it can not be challenged .
In 21st century America , facts are in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the ruling elites .
Therefore , facts are denied or not reported .
Just consider any major issue of the last two decades .
For example , “ Saddam Hussein ’ s weapons of mass destruction.
” The arms inspectors reported that Saddam Hussein had no such weapons , but the George W. Bush regime sent Colin Powell to the UN to deny this fact to the world and to convince the UN of a lie that Washington then used to destroy several countries and unleash terrorism throughout the Middle East .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the lie while ignoring the arms inspectors ’ report .
The subsequent 20 years of conflict in the Middle East and North Africa killed millions of innocent Muslims and has sent millions of displaced Muslims to Europe where they have destroyed the quality of European life , even cutting off people ’ s heads in a French church in Nice and raping Swedish women in public .
All of this happened because facts were denied , and the American media completely failed in their responsibility .
In America today , facts are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ theory.
” Anyone who tells a fact is demonized as a “ Russian agent , ” a “ white supremacist , ” an anti-semite , or a nut case .
Whether or not American democracy has a future depends on restoring integrity to the media and our public institutions .
especially the CIA , NSA , and FBI .
America ’ s future also depends on whether Nunes and Trump , who stood up to the liars , are returned to office by overwhelming vote .
If not , it will be clear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and there is no prospect of the United States ever again having an accountable government .
This documentary is certain to be memory-holed by social media and Google , which serve only the Elite ’ s agendas .
Watch it and save it while you can .
I will include the trailer below : By Paul Craig Roberts , Guest writer / Dr. Roberts has had careers in scholarship and academia , journalism , public service , and business .
He is chairman of The Institute for Political Economy .

The Plot Against the President
If Trump wins the election, unless it is an overwhelming victory that cannot be challenged, the Democrats and the American media will not admit that Trump won. The plan in place is to blame Trump’s win on fraud and to use the tactics of the “Maidan Revolution” in Ukraine, recently employed again in Belarus, to prevent Trump’s inauguration.
The documentary, The Plot Against the President, explains the “Russiagate” plot by the FBI, the Democrats, and the media to remove President Trump from office. The venality and corruption of FBI Director Comey, the American media, and Democrats, such as Adam Schiff, is scary.
That such an obvious plot against American democracy involving the country’s security agencies and one of the two ruling political parties could go on for three years without a single question by the media proves that the Establishment will not tolerate a non-establishment President or those who support him and that the media dares not cross the Establishment.
The fact that Comey is not in prison testifies to the power of the Deep State.
Had it not been for US Rep. Devin Nunes of the House Intelligence Committee the coup would have succeeded.
The coup attempt is not over. The documentary, which consists of the testimony of members of the House Intelligence Committee, National Security officials, and outside experts, shows that both Democrats, especially Adam Schiff, and the US media simply denied that Independent Prosecutor Mueller and the House Intelligence Committee failed to find any evidence of the Russiagate charges.
Adam Schiff stood before the American media and lied time and time again. The media knew he was lying and never called him on his lies. Not even once. The undeniable fact that Russiagate was a three-year hoax, an orchestrated deception to foreclose the Trump agenda, has not been admitted by Democrats or the presstitutes.
In other words, nothing is true unless the media admits it. And they don’t admit the truth. The Elite use the presstitutes to control the explanations and to keep the population in a false reality.
As our Founding Fathers said, without a free and independent media, there is no liberty. The United States does not have a free and independent media. It has a propaganda ministry for the ruling Elite.
Be sure you comprehend the implications, because you are about to see it again. If Trump wins the election, the media and the Democrat Party are not going to acknowledge the fact that Trump won – unless Trump’s win is so overwhelming that it cannot be challenged.
In 21st century America, facts are in the way of the power and the agendas of the ruling elites. Therefore, facts are denied or not reported. Just consider any major issue of the last two decades.
For example, “Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction.” The arms inspectors reported that Saddam Hussein had no such weapons, but the George W. Bush regime sent Colin Powell to the UN to deny this fact to the world and to convince the UN of a lie that Washington then used to destroy several countries and unleash terrorism throughout the Middle East. The American media turned a blind eye to the lie while ignoring the arms inspectors’ report.
The subsequent 20 years of conflict in the Middle East and North Africa killed millions of innocent Muslims and has sent millions of displaced Muslims to Europe where they have destroyed the quality of European life, even cutting off people’s heads in a French church in Nice and raping Swedish women in public. All of this happened because facts were denied, and the American media completely failed in their responsibility.
In America today, facts are relegated to the realm of “conspiracy theory.” Anyone who tells a fact is demonized as a “Russian agent,” a “white supremacist,” an anti-semite, or a nut case.
Whether or not American democracy has a future depends on restoring integrity to the media and our public institutions. especially the CIA, NSA, and FBI. America’s future also depends on whether Nunes and Trump, who stood up to the liars, are returned to office by overwhelming vote.
If not, it will be clear that the electorate does not understand, and there is no prospect of the United States ever again having an accountable government.
This documentary is certain to be memory-holed by social media and Google, which serve only the Elite’s agendas. Watch it and save it while you can.
I will include the trailer below:
By Paul Craig Roberts, Guest writer / Dr. Roberts has had careers in scholarship and academia, journalism, public service, and business. He is chairman of The Institute for Political Economy.


humansarefree--2020-10-30--EU Approval of Glyphosate — Based On Plagiarized Science From Monsanto

It ’ s hard to know where to begin when it comes to glyphosate , an active ingredient used in Monsanto ’ s infamous ‘ Roundup herbicide , ’ a product that ’ s illegal in many countries ( not including Canada and the United States ) .
For a number of years , these countries have been citing the devastating health and environmental effects of Roundup herbicide , namely regarding glyphosate .
Sri Lanka , for example , completely banned the product because of it ’ s link to deadly kidney disease , whereas many other countries have cited @ @ @ @ @ @ @ quite clear , and it ’ s been coming out for decades .
Fernando Manas , Ph.D. at the National University of Rio Cuarto in Argentina , outlines how “ There is evidence of high levels of genetic damage in people of Marcos Juarez ( Argentina ) , which may result from unintentional exposure to pesticides.
” ( source ) Nobody can really argue against why glyphosate shouldn ’ t be approved anywhere in the world , especially when you take a look at the science .
Glyphosate recently made headlines , as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was the first lawsuit claiming that glyphosate causes cancer to go to trial .
There are thousands upon thousands of similar pending cases .
Any jury that reviews all of the scientific evidence will not be able to rule otherwise , and Johnson ’ s case was a great example that showed glyphosate caused his cancer .
How are these products approved ?
It comes as a result of corrupt regulatory agencies here in Canada as well as within the US , specifically the Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CDC ) .
The list of examples is very long when it comes to corruption and government connections to corporations like Monsanto .
This is the only way these products get approved , it ’ s not science , it ’ s simply lobbying efforts and shady politics .
“ It is commonly believed that Roundup is among the safest pesticides… Despite its reputation , Roundup was by far the most toxic among the herbicides and insecticides tested .
This inconsistency between scientific fact and industrial claim may be attributed to huge economic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ falsify health risk assessments and delay health policy decisions.
” – R. Mesnage et al.
, Biomed Research International , Volume 2014 ( 2014 ) , article ID 179691 EU regulators recently decided to relicense glyphosate , and it came based on an assessment that was plagiarized from industry reports .
It ’ s quite backwards that for years , health regulators have been relying on the scientific reports from the company that manufactures these products , instead of seeking out independent scientific studies .
A group of MEPs decides to commission an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Federal Institute for Risk Assessment ( bFr ) copy-and-pasted tracts from Monsanto studies .
As the Guardian points out : The study ’ s findings have been released hours before a parliamentary vote on tightening independent scrutiny of the pesticides approvals process .
The authors said they found “ clear evidence of BfR ’ s deliberate pretence of an independent assessment , whereas in reality the authority was only echoing the industry applicant ’ s assessment .
Molly ScottCato , a Green MEP , said the scale of alleged plagiarism by the BfR @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ extremely alarming.
” Molly Scott Cato , a member of European Parliament , went on to tell the Guardian : “ This helps explain why the World Health Organization assessment on glyphosate as a probable human carcinogen was so at odds with EU assessors , who awarded this toxic pesticide a clean bill of health , brushing off warnings of its dangers.
” The study found plagiarism in half of the chapters assessing published studies on the health risk , which means that half of the science came directly from Monsanto themselves @ @ @ @ @ @ @ science .
And what does the industry do ?
As part of the process , they portrayed the various concerns as merely the ignorant opinions of misinformed individuals – and derided them as not only unscientific , but anti-science .
They then set to work to convince the public and government officials , through the dissemination of false information , that there was an overwhelming expert consensus , based on solid evidence , that GMOs were safe .
( source ) This quote came from a book written by Lawyer Steven Druker , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ showing how the agency manipulated the science and corrupted scientists in order to get GMOs approved .
You can read more about that in detail here .
The same thing goes for glyphosate .
The European Food Safety Authority ( EFSA ) based its recommendation that glyphosate was safe for public use on the BfR ’ s assessment .
According to the EFSA , “ The report does not provide any new scientific information that calls into question the assessment and conclusions of glyphosate .
EFSA stands firmly behind the integrity of its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ glyphosate.
” “ It is unacceptable that pesticide-industry studies receive greater recognition than scientific peer-reviewed open literature in regulatory decision-making .
Whilst this paper focuses on the US EPA , similar criticisms have been made of EU decisions and we fear that outside the EU , pressure to approve pesticides will increase.
” Again , it ’ s weird how this is even a debate .
This has been known for a very long time , and we ’ ve seen similar happenings with DDT in the past .
“ Children today are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
From childhood cancers to autism , birth defects and asthma , a wide range of childhood diseases and disorders are on the rise .
Our assessment of the latest science leaves little room for doubt ; pesticides are one key driver of this sobering trend.
” – October 2012 report by Pesticide Action Network North America ( PANNA ) ( source ) , ( source ) Keep in mind that the use of glyphosate has skyrocketed , a 1500 % increase from 1995 to 2005 was seen , and 100 million pounds @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on more than a billion acres in the United States alone .
It ’ s found in our food , our beverages , our favourite snacks , etc .
It ’ s even been found in the breast milk of mothers , and in urine samples of people across Europe .
( source ) The main toxic effects of glyphosate as identified by MIT ’ s Dr. Stephanie Seneff include : • Kills beneficial gut bacteria and allows pathogens to overgrow • Interferes with function of cytochrome p450 ( CYP enzymes ) • @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , manganese , etc ) • Interferes with synthesis of aromatic amino acids and methionine – leads to shortages in critical neurotransmitters and folate • Disrupts sulfate synthesis and sulfate transport

It’s hard to know where to begin when it comes to glyphosate, an active ingredient used in Monsanto’s infamous ‘Roundup herbicide,’ a product that’s illegal in many countries (not including Canada and the United States).
For a number of years, these countries have been citing the devastating health and environmental effects of Roundup herbicide, namely regarding glyphosate.
Sri Lanka, for example, completely banned the product because of it’s link to deadly kidney disease, whereas many other countries have cited its carcinogenic effects. The science is quite clear, and it’s been coming out for decades.
Fernando Manas, Ph.D. at the National University of Rio Cuarto in Argentina, outlines how “There is evidence of high levels of genetic damage in people of Marcos Juarez (Argentina), which may result from unintentional exposure to pesticides.” (source)
Nobody can really argue against why glyphosate shouldn’t be approved anywhere in the world, especially when you take a look at the science. Glyphosate recently made headlines, as the case regarding school groundskeeper Dewayne Johnson was the first lawsuit claiming that glyphosate causes cancer to go to trial.
There are thousands upon thousands of similar pending cases. Any jury that reviews all of the scientific evidence will not be able to rule otherwise, and Johnson’s case was a great example that showed glyphosate caused his cancer.
How are these products approved? It comes as a result of corrupt regulatory agencies here in Canada as well as within the US, specifically the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
The list of examples is very long when it comes to corruption and government connections to corporations like Monsanto. This is the only way these products get approved, it’s not science, it’s simply lobbying efforts and shady politics.
“It is commonly believed that Roundup is among the safest pesticides… Despite its reputation, Roundup was by far the most toxic among the herbicides and insecticides tested. This inconsistency between scientific fact and industrial claim may be attributed to huge economic interests, which have been found to falsify health risk assessments and delay health policy decisions.” – R. Mesnage et al., Biomed Research International, Volume 2014 (2014), article ID 179691
EU regulators recently decided to relicense glyphosate, and it came based on an assessment that was plagiarized from industry reports. It’s quite backwards that for years, health regulators have been relying on the scientific reports from the company that manufactures these products, instead of seeking out independent scientific studies.
A group of MEPs decides to commission an investigation into claims that Germany’s Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (bFr) copy-and-pasted tracts from Monsanto studies.
As the Guardian points out:
The study’s findings have been released hours before a parliamentary vote on tightening independent scrutiny of the pesticides approvals process. The authors said they found “clear evidence of BfR’s deliberate pretence of an independent assessment, whereas in reality the authority was only echoing the industry applicant’s assessment.
Molly ScottCato, a Green MEP, said the scale of alleged plagiarism by the BfR authors shown by the new paper was “extremely alarming.”
Molly Scott Cato, a member of European Parliament, went on to tell the Guardian:
“This helps explain why the World Health Organization assessment on glyphosate as a probable human carcinogen was so at odds with EU assessors, who awarded this toxic pesticide a clean bill of health, brushing off warnings of its dangers.”
The study found plagiarism in half of the chapters assessing published studies on the health risk, which means that half of the science came directly from Monsanto themselves, because the plagiarism was of industry science. And what does the industry do?
Jane Goodall, although referencing GMOs, hammers home the point:
As part of the process, they portrayed the various concerns as merely the ignorant opinions of misinformed individuals – and derided them as not only unscientific, but anti-science. They then set to work to convince the public and government officials, through the dissemination of false information, that there was an overwhelming expert consensus, based on solid evidence, that GMOs were safe. (source)
This quote came from a book written by Lawyer Steven Druker, who sued the FDA and uncovered documents showing how the agency manipulated the science and corrupted scientists in order to get GMOs approved. You can read more about that in detail here.
The same thing goes for glyphosate.
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) based its recommendation that glyphosate was safe for public use on the BfR’s assessment.
According to the EFSA, “The report does not provide any new scientific information that calls into question the assessment and conclusions of glyphosate. EFSA stands firmly behind the integrity of its risk assessment process and its conclusions on glyphosate.”
Jo Lewis, the Soil Associations policy director told the Guardian:
“It is unacceptable that pesticide-industry studies receive greater recognition than scientific peer-reviewed open literature in regulatory decision-making. Whilst this paper focuses on the US EPA, similar criticisms have been made of EU decisions and we fear that outside the EU, pressure to approve pesticides will increase.”
Again, it’s weird how this is even a debate. This has been known for a very long time, and we’ve seen similar happenings with DDT in the past.
“Children today are sicker than they were a generation ago. From childhood cancers to autism, birth defects and asthma, a wide range of childhood diseases and disorders are on the rise. Our assessment of the latest science leaves little room for doubt; pesticides are one key driver of this sobering trend.” – October 2012 report by Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA) (source), (source)
Keep in mind that the use of glyphosate has skyrocketed, a 1500% increase from 1995 to 2005 was seen, and 100 million pounds of this stuff is used every year on more than a billion acres in the United States alone.
It’s found in our food, our beverages, our favourite snacks, etc.
It’s even been found in the breast milk of mothers, and in urine samples of people across Europe. (source)
The main toxic effects of glyphosate as identified by MIT’s Dr. Stephanie Seneff include:
• Kills beneficial gut bacteria and allows pathogens to overgrow
• Interferes with function of cytochrome p450 (CYP enzymes)
• Chelates important minerals (iron, cobalt, manganese, etc)
• Interferes with synthesis of aromatic amino acids and methionine – leads to shortages in critical neurotransmitters and folate
• Disrupts sulfate synthesis and sulfate transport
Need I write more?
Reference: Collective-evolution.com (excerpt)


humansarefree--2020-10-30--Pakistani Allowed to Create Law in Scotland, Criminalizing ‘Hate Speech’ Inside People’s Homes

A Pakistani who currently works as the “ Cabinet Secretary for Justice ” in Scotland has announced plans to criminalize speech inside the home that he personally feels might lead to a “ hate crime.
” Humza Yousaf , who is not even Scottish , is credited with creating and implementing the so-called “ Hate Crime and Public Order ( Scotland ) Bill , ” which aims to protect “ minorities ” from mean talk that might take place around people ’ s dinner tables .
While the Public Order Act of 1986 has long prohibited threatening , abusive or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ contains a “ swelling defence ” provision that allows people to say what they wish inside their own homes – something that Yousaf ’ s new legislation abolishes .
Under Yousaf ’ s new restrictions , Scots , including those who work as journalists and even theater directors , could be forced to face the courts if they say something not nice about Muslims , for instance , which are flooding the United Kingdom at record pace and displacing the natives .
According to Yousaf , Scots have no right to engage in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their own property .
Yousaf ’ s proposal was given the nod by Lord Bracadale to proceed with it , despite opposition from the Scottish Catholic Church , police representatives , academics , artists and others .
“ It will introduce an offence of stirring-up hatred against people with protected characteristics , including disability , sexual orientation and age , ” writes Mark McLaughlin for The Times ( U.K. ) .
In other words , if you are someone who does not have a “ protected characteristic , ” then you will not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ under Yousaf ’ s law .
Why are foreigners allowed to create “ hate speech ” laws in countries where they do not even belong ?
While Lord Bracadale is responsible for having made the recommendations that led to the bill ’ s creation , he did reportedly advise the Scottish Cabinet to think long and hard about how the public order will impact what used to be people ’ s private lives .
The committee ’ s convenor asked Lord Bracadale if from his “ experience of the operation of criminal law @ @ @ @ @ @ @ alert to some danger in that , ” to which Lord Bracadale responded in the affirmative .
“ I think that your concern is well-founded , ” he stated .
In other words , Scotland will now have a snitch culture in which angry “ minorities ” and their allies can target those they do not like with this weaponized legislation , which again was crafted by someone who is not even Scottish , but who somehow attained a high-level seat in Scotland ’ s government .
The Scottish government did agree to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , if left as Yousaf wrote it , would have made this “ hate crime ” bill even more of a threat than it already is .
Instead of reading “ likely to stir up hatred , ” the new version of the bill specifies that only language “ intended to stir up hatred ” can be prosecuted , which is much harder to prove than the former .
The Christian Institute , reporting on the bill , expressed thankfulness to the Justice Secretary for his willingness to compromise on what it describes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ parts of the [ b ] ill. ” At the same time , the group says that “ many more changes are still required.
” Here in the United States , we are not that far gone – at least not yet – when it comes to criminalizing free speech .
But we very soon could get to where Scotland is if the thought and speech police are allowed to continue in their quest to abolish the First Amendment – and the rest of the Constitution , for that matter .
We are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to come if things continue on their current trajectory with the attempted criminalization of phrases like “ it ’ s okay to be white , ” which social justice warriors ( SJW ) claim is “ racist ” and “ hateful .
”

by Ethan Huff
A Pakistani who currently works as the “Cabinet Secretary for Justice” in Scotland has announced plans to criminalize speech inside the home that he personally feels might lead to a “hate crime.”
Humza Yousaf, who is not even Scottish, is credited with creating and implementing the so-called “Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Bill,” which aims to protect “minorities” from mean talk that might take place around people’s dinner tables.
While the Public Order Act of 1986 has long prohibited threatening, abusive or insulting words and behavior, that law contains a “swelling defence” provision that allows people to say what they wish inside their own homes – something that Yousaf’s new legislation abolishes.
Under Yousaf’s new restrictions, Scots, including those who work as journalists and even theater directors, could be forced to face the courts if they say something not nice about Muslims, for instance, which are flooding the United Kingdom at record pace and displacing the natives.
According to Yousaf, Scots have no right to engage in “hateful speech,” even on their own property.
Yousaf’s proposal was given the nod by Lord Bracadale to proceed with it, despite opposition from the Scottish Catholic Church, police representatives, academics, artists and others.
“It will introduce an offence of stirring-up hatred against people with protected characteristics, including disability, sexual orientation and age,” writes Mark McLaughlin for The Times (U.K.).
In other words, if you are someone who does not have a “protected characteristic,” then you will not be protected from “hate speech” under Yousaf’s law.
Why are foreigners allowed to create “hate speech” laws in countries where they do not even belong?
While Lord Bracadale is responsible for having made the recommendations that led to the bill’s creation, he did reportedly advise the Scottish Cabinet to think long and hard about how the public order will impact what used to be people’s private lives.
The committee’s convenor asked Lord Bracadale if from his “experience of the operation of criminal law” that the Parliament should “be alert to some danger in that,” to which Lord Bracadale responded in the affirmative.
“I think that your concern is well-founded,” he stated.
In other words, Scotland will now have a snitch culture in which angry “minorities” and their allies can target those they do not like with this weaponized legislation, which again was crafted by someone who is not even Scottish, but who somehow attained a high-level seat in Scotland’s government.
The Scottish government did agree to change one key piece of wording that, if left as Yousaf wrote it, would have made this “hate crime” bill even more of a threat than it already is.
Instead of reading “likely to stir up hatred,” the new version of the bill specifies that only language “intended to stir up hatred” can be prosecuted, which is much harder to prove than the former.
The Christian Institute, reporting on the bill, expressed thankfulness to the Justice Secretary for his willingness to compromise on what it describes as “one of the most controversial parts of the [b]ill.”
At the same time, the group says that “many more changes are still required.”
Here in the United States, we are not that far gone – at least not yet – when it comes to criminalizing free speech.
But we very soon could get to where Scotland is if the thought and speech police are allowed to continue in their quest to abolish the First Amendment – and the rest of the Constitution, for that matter.
We are already seeing glimpses of what is soon to come if things continue on their current trajectory with the attempted criminalization of phrases like “it’s okay to be white,” which social justice warriors (SJW) claim is “racist” and “hateful.”