humansarefree--2020-07-10--America Needs to Stop Reacting to Coronavirus Like a Bunch of Hysterics

Americans are learning how to cope with the virus in a common-sense way .
That doesn ’ t mean being reckless , but neither does it mean cowering inside every day of every week and every month unless a vaccine shows up .
Harvard University recently announced that it will ban students from in-person classes for the entirety of the next academic year .
The decision , not based on science , is typical of the decisions made by many elites in response to the novel coronavirus sweeping the globe .
Global pandemics aren ’ t new , but the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one is .
Americans have been blessed to experience few pandemics in recent decades .
The swine flu of 2009 was no fun , as my husband can attest , but it resulted in only 273,304 hospitalizations and 12,469 deaths in the United States .
The Wuhan virus hospitalizations and deaths have eclipsed those numbers many times over .
But from 1918 to 1968 , pandemics , deadly flus , and horrific childhood diseases were much more common .
When the Asian flu hit the United States in 1957 , during the Eisenhower @ @ @ @ @ @ @ contagion college students had faced in a lifetime of contagious diseases .
The 1957 Asian flu killed 116,000 Americans at a time the U.S. population was 172 million , just more than half the current population .
That would be the equivalent of 222,000 Americans today .
By comparison , the coronavirus has killed 133,000 Americans thus far .
By the time the Asian flu came along in 1957 , many college students had already battled measles , mumps , chicken pox , German measles , and polio .
For many years , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The parents of these college students had battled diphtheria , scarlet fever , typhoid fever , pneumonia , and the Spanish flu that killed 675,000 Americans and more than 50 million across the world .
Coronavirus And The Sun : A Lesson From The 1918 Influenza Pandemic In today ’ s terms , that would be the equivalent of more than 1.6 million Americans dying from coronavirus .
There were brief , localized school closures in 1957 but the epidemic barely formed a blip in the American consciousness .
It didn ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in major Eisenhower biographies .
Even the horrific Spanish flu was not a major media event .
There is no historic record of President Woodrow Wilson even publicly mentioning the flu , which killed more than 0.5 percent of the U.S. population .
The 1968 Hong Kong flu was also bad , killing about 100,000 Americans when the population was just 60 percent of what it is now .
America is in an epic battle with the Wuhan coronavirus .
It ’ s not fun .
It ’ s been messing with us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should want America to win .
Instead , it seems like a lot of our media and other institutions are rooting for the virus and have an attitude suggesting the virus has us dead to rights .
See , for example , “ Georgia ’ s experiment in human sacrifice.
” One of the ways the media root for the virus is by hyping it like they hype local sports teams .
It ’ s not that it ’ s not a horrifically deadly and contagious virus — it is .
But the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ many multiples .
What we know about the virus is that it is particularly bad for older Americans and those in long-term care .
It ’ s no fun for the younger folks who have gotten it , but it ’ s far less deadly for them .
Children are more likely to die from a flu infection than a coronavirus infection .
The country is seeing a small uptick in cases , centered around a few major cities .
That ’ s true and concerning , but it need not be hysteria-inducing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ re seeing an uptick in cases , we ’ re seeing a smaller percentage of ER visits for coronavirus , a smaller percentage of hospitalizations to visits , a smaller percentage of deaths from infections , shorter hospital stays , and a variety of other improved metrics .
Americans are learning how to cope with the virus in a common-sense way .
That doesn ’ t mean being reckless , but neither does it mean cowering inside every day of every week and every month unless a vaccine shows up .
There have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ viruses and treatments for them since 100 years ago .
We wouldn ’ t want to emulate all of the things that Americans did in previous pandemic situations , whether it was Wilson ’ s complete lack of concern or Eisenhower ’ s general lack of concern , or holding parades during a horrific period of Spanish flu outbreak like Philadelphia did .
But we do need to emulate some of our American forefathers ’ attitudes .
The moment requires bold leadership , not cowering in the face of something that doesn ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ When Trump extolled the beauty and virtue of the United States in front of Mt .
Rushmore last Friday , the media opined that he was being dark and divisive by critiquing the culture war they ’ re waging .
Left out of the media tantrums were discussions about the significance of the attitudes of the men memorialized on that mountain .
George Washington famously won a revolution in the midst of a smallpox epidemic .
Thomas Jefferson risked life and limb by authoring the Declaration of Independence .
Abraham Lincoln was killed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ black Americans .
Theodore Roosevelt took a bullet from an assassin in the middle of a campaign speech , made sure no one killed his assailant , used his extensive hunting knowledge to ascertain that the bullet hadn ’ t pierced his lung , and finished the speech .
“ Ladies and gentlemen , I don ’ t know whether you fully understand that I have just been shot , but it takes more than that to kill a Bull Moose , ” he told the assembled .
Americans put a man on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on a postage size stamp of land on Mars , harnessed the power of the atom , defeated Germany in a world war — twice , invented the automobile , and defeated gravity and invented human flight .
Yet right now many of us are sitting alone in our homes behind cloth masks with dubious protective qualities thinking about banning children from attending school even though they are at extremely low risk of infection or as vectors of transmission .
We need a steely resolve , not simpering fear .
Nothing is going @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not Nazis , not gravity !
Nothing .
We ’ re America .
We can do this .

Americans are learning how to cope with the virus in a common-sense way. That doesn’t mean being reckless, but neither does it mean cowering inside every day of every week and every month unless a jjab shows up.
by Mollie Hemingway
Harvard University recently announced that it will ban students from in-person classes for the entirety of the next academic year.
The decision, not based on science, is typical of the decisions made by many elites in response to the novel coronavirus sweeping the globe.
Global pandemics aren’t new, but the way many Americans are responding to this one is. Americans have been blessed to experience few pandemics in recent decades.
The swine flu of 2009 was no fun, as my husband can attest, but it resulted in only 273,304 hospitalizations and 12,469 deaths in the United States. The Wuhan virus hospitalizations and deaths have eclipsed those numbers many times over.
But from 1918 to 1968, pandemics, deadly flus, and horrific childhood diseases were much more common.
When the Asian flu hit the United States in 1957, during the Eisenhower administration, it was just the latest contagion college students had faced in a lifetime of contagious diseases.
The 1957 Asian flu killed 116,000 Americans at a time the U.S. population was 172 million, just more than half the current population. That would be the equivalent of 222,000 Americans today.
By comparison, the coronavirus has killed 133,000 Americans thus far.
By the time the Asian flu came along in 1957, many college students had already battled measles, mumps, chicken pox, German measles, and polio.
For many years, there were no jjabs for these things. The parents of these college students had battled diphtheria, scarlet fever, typhoid fever, pneumonia, and the Spanish flu that killed 675,000 Americans and more than 50 million across the world.
Coronavirus And The Sun: A Lesson From The 1918 Influenza Pandemic
In today’s terms, that would be the equivalent of more than 1.6 million Americans dying from coronavirus.
There were brief, localized school closures in 1957 but the epidemic barely formed a blip in the American consciousness.
It didn’t even elicit much of a mention in major Eisenhower biographies. Even the horrific Spanish flu was not a major media event.
There is no historic record of President Woodrow Wilson even publicly mentioning the flu, which killed more than 0.5 percent of the U.S. population.
The 1968 Hong Kong flu was also bad, killing about 100,000 Americans when the population was just 60 percent of what it is now.
America is in an epic battle with the Wuhan coronavirus. It’s not fun. It’s been messing with us. It behaves oddly. But Americans should want America to win.
Instead, it seems like a lot of our media and other institutions are rooting for the virus and have an attitude suggesting the virus has us dead to rights.
See, for example, “Georgia’s experiment in human sacrifice.”
One of the ways the media root for the virus is by hyping it like they hype local sports teams. It’s not that it’s not a horrifically deadly and contagious virus — it is. But the media routinely amplify its actual risk by many multiples.
What we know about the virus is that it is particularly bad for older Americans and those in long-term care. It’s no fun for the younger folks who have gotten it, but it’s far less deadly for them.
Children are more likely to die from a flu infection than a coronavirus infection.
The country is seeing a small uptick in cases, centered around a few major cities. That’s true and concerning, but it need not be hysteria-inducing.
At the same time we’re seeing an uptick in cases, we’re seeing a smaller percentage of ER visits for coronavirus, a smaller percentage of hospitalizations to visits, a smaller percentage of deaths from infections, shorter hospital stays, and a variety of other improved metrics.
Americans are learning how to cope with the virus in a common-sense way. That doesn’t mean being reckless, but neither does it mean cowering inside every day of every week and every month unless a jjab shows up.
There have been major improvements in scientific knowledge about viruses and treatments for them since 100 years ago.
We wouldn’t want to emulate all of the things that Americans did in previous pandemic situations, whether it was Wilson’s complete lack of concern or Eisenhower’s general lack of concern, or holding parades during a horrific period of Spanish flu outbreak like Philadelphia did. But we do need to emulate some of our American forefathers’ attitudes.
The moment requires bold leadership, not cowering in the face of something that doesn’t come close to previous challenges.
When Trump extolled the beauty and virtue of the United States in front of Mt. Rushmore last Friday, the media opined that he was being dark and divisive by critiquing the culture war they’re waging.
Left out of the media tantrums were discussions about the significance of the attitudes of the men memorialized on that mountain.
George Washington famously won a revolution in the midst of a smallpox epidemic. Thomas Jefferson risked life and limb by authoring the Declaration of Independence. Abraham Lincoln was killed by an assassin because he emancipated enslaved black Americans.
Theodore Roosevelt took a bullet from an assassin in the middle of a campaign speech, made sure no one killed his assailant, used his extensive hunting knowledge to ascertain that the bullet hadn’t pierced his lung, and finished the speech.
“Ladies and gentlemen, I don’t know whether you fully understand that I have just been shot, but it takes more than that to kill a Bull Moose,” he told the assembled.
Americans put a man on the freaking moon, landed a robot on a postage size stamp of land on Mars, harnessed the power of the atom, defeated Germany in a world war — twice, invented the automobile, and defeated gravity and invented human flight.
Yet right now many of us are sitting alone in our homes behind cloth masks with dubious protective qualities thinking about banning children from attending school even though they are at extremely low risk of infection or as vectors of transmission.
We need a steely resolve, not simpering fear. Nothing is going to stop us. Not polio, not Nazis, not gravity! Nothing. We’re America. We can do this.


humansarefree--2020-07-10--The Mask is the Mark of the Beast in Larval Form

NOTE TO FACT CHECKERS : This is an editorial piece .
It is my personal opinion .
Nothing in the following collection of words can cause physical harm to anyone , nor can any of it be taken as offensive or be considered hate speech by any rational person .
As a sovereign being I am entitled to express the thoughts in my head without censorship , punishment , reprisal , or threats against my livelihood .
Please respect my right to free speech and self-expression , and respect the rights of those who wish to read this .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not misinformation .
It is not dangerous , and it certainly is not racist .
It is merely one man ’ s opinion expressed in editorial form .
So please , whoever has ears , let them hear .
Let ’ s just for a moment suspend all disbelief in the official Covid-19 narrative .
Let ’ s set aside questions about mortality rates , death certificate designations , controversy over treatments and testing procedures , and politics .
Instead , I want to zoom out a bit and do some traveling back @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bring your attention to the progression of something critically important to all free human beings on this planet .
There ’ s a great divergence taking place , dividing our country and perhaps the entire world .
To most , this was all unexpected .
A big surprise .
To others , this has been a long time coming , but through the fog of confusion around us , one thing is crystal clear to those of us who ’ ve been watching , warning and waiting for a long time : we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ very dystopian future where personal sovereignty and privacy will become historical ideas unfitting for such a brave new world .
I am not a religious man , but I do come from a Christian culture , and of particular note today is a chapter in the Bible that strikes abject fear into the hearts of believers .
Revelation 13 , particularly the following sentence which refers to The Beast coming out of the earth : “ It also forced all people , great and small , rich and poor , free and slave @ @ @ @ @ @ @ right hands or on their foreheads , 17 so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark , which is the name of the beast or the number of its name.
” ~ Revelation 13 For nearly two-thousand years , believers have been looking for signs of this prophecy coming to fruition , and the term ‘ The Mark of the Beast , ’ is now firmly entrenched in our cultural lexicon .
Kanye West used it today in reference to a Covid vaccine .
Louis Farrakhan was preaching @ @ @ @ @ @ @ So called conspiracy theorists have for decades been looking at institutional documents and central planning agendas , warning that a global government was being organized to conquer the planet and enslave us all with the boot of technology .
It has gained social capital for its implied meaning that someday free people will be subjected to an authoritarian control system which treats human beings like livestock to be ID ’ d , tracked , traced , controlled , milked and slaughtered when the time is right .
And shouldn ’ t an idea @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the free and the independent ?
After all , it implies an end to free will and an end to self-determination .
It implies total , hopeless , global slavery .
Now here we are today .
Covid face masks .
Someone recently said to me that the masks are the mark of the beast in larval form , and this , to me , seems a fair metaphor .
A larva is the juvenile form that many animals and insects take before maturing into an adult .
Often , the appearance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ quite different from the mature animal .
In a matter of a few short months we we ’ ve gone from business-as-usual to cover up your face or you can ’ t buy groceries .
We don ’ t exactly understand or agree on the precise nature of the threat , but in the blink of an eye we ’ ve gone from masks being suggested , to masks being recommended , to masks being mandated in some locales , to masks being mandated in all locales , and with New Jersey leading @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mandated outdoors in public spaces , all of this enforceable by law ( which is punishable by fines and the risk of arrest ) , and by exclusion from the economy .
All the while , we are watching the experts on television nonchalantly inform us that our future participation in the economy and in society at large will be dependent on our acquiescence to whatever new rules and mandates they throw at us .
That we will be surveilled , monitored , vaccinated , and contact traced everywhere we go , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , worship , go to school or gather , we will have to show proof of submission to the system ’ s demands .
In 2014 , Australian writer Steven Tritton warned us that we had already crossed the Rubicon into this future , but that in order to go all the way we needed only the right crisis to catalyze public opinion in favor of such measures .
“ Perhaps in the midst of such turmoil or following a worldwide economic meltdown , comes a momentous shift to a cashless society with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to participate in the new global financial order .
“ However , the newly hatched revolutionary system will be one that ensnares humanity in a totalitarian global surveillance society unlike the modern world has ever seen given such advanced technology in place .
We have already crossed the Rubicon.
” ~ Steven Tritton in 2014 In 2012 we published an article quoting the father of a San Antonio high school girl who was objecting to the school ’ s requirement that all students wear RFID ( radio frequency identification ) badges to track @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to reduce tardiness and truancy .
He called the badges , ‘ the mark of the beast , ’ and they certainly were an ample introduction to the emergent technology that will become what many fear is the real mark .
But people aren ’ t stupid .
They ’ re frightful , but not stupid .
So , for the beast to make inroads on the effort to track and trace everyone , the progression needs to be incremental , touching on key points of fear along the way , always increasing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to allow the proverbial frog in the pot to boil before he becomes aware of his imminent doom .
In order for people to accept compulsory measures like these they have to be deceived into believing that their life depends on it .
People don ’ t seem to fully comprehend what is being given away in this desperate hour , but without a doubt , they will feel it , and long to have it back , in the coming dystopian future .
My sense is that we are losing something exclusively @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the way we view each other , and that they shift our perception of others away from trust .
Where once we saw smiles and community , now we see furrowed brows , concern and hazard .
I feel we are jumping headlong into the dark abyss of fear , giving power and precedence to the inner authoritarian , and that as we forfeit bits of self integrity to go along to get along , we become envious and agitated with those who wish not to comply .
“ I contend that there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ something virtual reality can never match , something artificial intelligence can never be programmed with .
“ Words such as conscience , compassion , warmth , kindness , generosity , spontaneity , imagination , inspiration and creativity , give some hint as to what this something might be.
” ~ Nigel Kerner So for today , it ’ s required masks .
Tomorrow will see legally mandated contact tracing apps on your phone .
Then required immunity certificates and special health passports .
Then on to some more permanent form of traceable , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ implant .
Call it what you want , but if you want to feed your family today , you ’ d better mask up .
And if you are reading this beyond 2020 , I hope that time has proven me wrong and that we have somehow collectively managed to squash this wicked bug before it evolves into its full form .

NOTE TO FACT CHECKERS: This is an editorial piece. It is my personal opinion. Nothing in the following collection of words can cause physical harm to anyone, nor can any of it be taken as offensive or be considered hate speech by any rational person.
As a sovereign being I am entitled to express the thoughts in my head without censorship, punishment, reprisal, or threats against my livelihood. Please respect my right to free speech and self-expression, and respect the rights of those who wish to read this.
This is not fake news. It is not misinformation. It is not dangerous, and it certainly is not racist. It is merely one man’s opinion expressed in editorial form. So please, whoever has ears, let them hear.
by Dylan Charles, Waking Times
Let’s just for a moment suspend all disbelief in the official Covid-19 narrative. Let’s set aside questions about mortality rates, death certificate designations, controversy over treatments and testing procedures, and politics.
Instead, I want to zoom out a bit and do some traveling back and forth in time in order to bring your attention to the progression of something critically important to all free human beings on this planet.
There’s a great divergence taking place, dividing our country and perhaps the entire world. To most, this was all unexpected. A big surprise.
To others, this has been a long time coming, but through the fog of confusion around us, one thing is crystal clear to those of us who’ve been watching, warning and waiting for a long time: we are on a stepping stone toward a very dystopian future where personal sovereignty and privacy will become historical ideas unfitting for such a brave new world.
I am not a religious man, but I do come from a Christian culture, and of particular note today is a chapter in the Bible that strikes abject fear into the hearts of believers. Revelation 13, particularly the following sentence which refers to The Beast coming out of the earth:
“It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, 17 so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name.” ~ Revelation 13
For nearly two-thousand years, believers have been looking for signs of this prophecy coming to fruition, and the term ‘The Mark of the Beast,’ is now firmly entrenched in our cultural lexicon.
Kanye West used it today in reference to a Covid jjab. Louis Farrakhan was preaching about it over a decade ago.
So called conspiracy theorists have for decades been looking at institutional documents and central planning agendas, warning that a global government was being organized to conquer the planet and enslave us all with the boot of technology.
It has gained social capital for its implied meaning that someday free people will be subjected to an authoritarian control system which treats human beings like livestock to be ID’d, tracked, traced, controlled, milked and slaughtered when the time is right.
And shouldn’t an idea like this stoke fear in the hearts of the free and the independent? After all, it implies an end to free will and an end to self-determination. It implies total, hopeless, global slavery.
Now here we are today. Covid face masks.
Someone recently said to me that the masks are the mark of the beast in larval form, and this, to me, seems a fair metaphor.
A larva is the juvenile form that many animals and insects take before maturing into an adult. Often, the appearance of an animal in larval form is quite different from the mature animal.
In a matter of a few short months we we’ve gone from business-as-usual to cover up your face or you can’t buy groceries.
We don’t exactly understand or agree on the precise nature of the threat, but in the blink of an eye we’ve gone from masks being suggested, to masks being recommended, to masks being mandated in some locales, to masks being mandated in all locales, and with New Jersey leading the way, masks are now being mandated outdoors in public spaces, all of this enforceable by law (which is punishable by fines and the risk of arrest), and by exclusion from the economy.
All the while, we are watching the experts on television nonchalantly inform us that our future participation in the economy and in society at large will be dependent on our acquiescence to whatever new rules and mandates they throw at us.
That we will be surveilled, monitored, vaccinated, and contact traced everywhere we go, and that in order to buy or sell, worship, go to school or gather, we will have to show proof of submission to the system’s demands.
In 2014, Australian writer Steven Tritton warned us that we had already crossed the Rubicon into this future, but that in order to go all the way we needed only the right crisis to catalyze public opinion in favor of such measures.
“Perhaps in the midst of such turmoil or following a worldwide economic meltdown, comes a momentous shift to a cashless society with an embedded device compulsory for every individual to participate in the new global financial order.
“However, the newly hatched revolutionary system will be one that ensnares humanity in a totalitarian global surveillance society unlike the modern world has ever seen given such advanced technology in place. We have already crossed the Rubicon.” ~ Steven Tritton in 2014
In 2012 we published an article quoting the father of a San Antonio high school girl who was objecting to the school’s requirement that all students wear RFID (radio frequency identification) badges to track student’s whereabouts in an effort to reduce tardiness and truancy.
He called the badges, ‘the mark of the beast,’ and they certainly were an ample introduction to the emergent technology that will become what many fear is the real mark.
But people aren’t stupid. They’re frightful, but not stupid.
So, for the beast to make inroads on the effort to track and trace everyone, the progression needs to be incremental, touching on key points of fear along the way, always increasing the intensity of the crisis so as to allow the proverbial frog in the pot to boil before he becomes aware of his imminent doom.
In order for people to accept compulsory measures like these they have to be deceived into believing that their life depends on it.
People don’t seem to fully comprehend what is being given away in this desperate hour, but without a doubt, they will feel it, and long to have it back, in the coming dystopian future.
My sense is that we are losing something exclusively human. That the masks actually alter the way we view each other, and that they shift our perception of others away from trust.
Where once we saw smiles and community, now we see furrowed brows, concern and hazard.
I feel we are jumping headlong into the dark abyss of fear, giving power and precedence to the inner authoritarian, and that as we forfeit bits of self integrity to go along to get along, we become envious and agitated with those who wish not to comply.
“I contend that there is something hugely meaningful about humanity, something virtual reality can never match, something artificial intelligence can never be programmed with.
“Words such as conscience, compassion, warmth, kindness, generosity, spontaneity, imagination, inspiration and creativity, give some hint as to what this something might be.” ~ Nigel Kerner
So for today, it’s required masks. Tomorrow will see legally mandated contact tracing apps on your phone. Then required immunity certificates and special health passports. Then on to some more permanent form of traceable, wearable tech like a tattoo or an implant.
Call it what you want, but if you want to feed your family today, you’d better mask up.
And if you are reading this beyond 2020, I hope that time has proven me wrong and that we have somehow collectively managed to squash this wicked bug before it evolves into its full form.


humansarefree--2020-07-10--As Long As Mainstream Media Propaganda Exists, Democracy Is A Sham

A new Reuters/Ipsos poll has reportedly found that a majority of Americans believe the completely discredited narrative that the Russian government paid Taliban-linked fighters to kill the occupying forces of the US and its allies in Afghanistan .
“ A majority of Americans believe that Russia paid the Taliban to kill U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan last year amid negotiations to end the war , and more than half want to respond with new economic sanctions against Moscow , according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released on Wednesday , ” Reuters reports .
“ Overall , 60 % of Americans said they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ soldiers to be ‘ very ’ or ‘ somewhat ’ believable , while 21 % said they were not credible and the rest were unsure , ” says Reuters .
Those 21 percent are objectively correct : the story is not credible , and it ’ s not even close .
Gareth Porter shows in The Grayzone how the “ Bountygate ” narrative is so utterly baseless that even US intelligence agencies have dismissed it , Joe Lauria of Consortium News explains how it doesn ’ t make any sense on its face @ @ @ @ @ @ @ breaks down the appalling journalistic malpractice that went into circulating this incredibly thinly sourced story to the mainstream public .
The story advances no solid facts or verified information .
What it does advance is pre-existing imperialist agendas like remaining in Afghanistan , killing the last of the remaining nuclear deals with Moscow , and manufacturing public support for new Russia sanctions .
And yet a majority of people believed it , and still believe it .
The narrative that Russia paid Taliban fighters to kill occupying forces is now regarded as an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ despite being backed by literally zero facts .
If people were as objective and adept at critical thinking as we tend to believe we are , the mass media ’ s unconscionable facilitation of a brazen cold war psyop would by itself have killed off all public trust in the institution of mass news reporting .
But people are not as objective and adept at critical thinking as we tend to believe we are .
People have many cognitive biases which distort our ability to objectively process information and understand events , including @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is true just because they ’ ve heard it said multiple times .
This makes us easily susceptible to mass media propaganda , where our encounters with daily news headlines can shape our perception of what ’ s going on in the world regardless of whether or not those headlines are backed by actual facts .
This latest poll is a perfect example of how the plutocrat-owned media manipulate public opinion in the interest of establishment agendas using brazen propaganda campaigns , but it is just the most recent example .
Also read @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Citizens Is Officially Legal Now Over and over and over again we see public perception of what ’ s going on distorted by lies inserted into their minds by the corporate news media , like when half a year after the invasion of Iraq seven in ten Americans believed Saddam Hussein was responsible for the 9/11 attacks .
All it took to trick them into believing this and supporting the invasion was repeatedly mentioning 9/11 and Saddam in the same breath , despite there never being any evidence whatsoever for any such thing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rare , it is ubiquitous and ongoing .
Every single day the plutocratic media are putting ideas in people ’ s minds which favor the establishment upon which said plutocrats have built their kingdoms , normalizing the insane status quoand manufacturing support for agendas which bolster it .
This is not some delusional conspiracy theory , it ’ s a well-documented fact to which many mainstream journalists have testified .
As long as this remains the case in our society , democracy can not exist in any meaningful way .
As long as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ operatives are able to consistently manipulate the way a critical mass of people think and vote , then you can not rightly say that the people are in charge of the fate of their nation .
If the majority is consistently in alignment with the plutocrats whose outsized media influence enables them to dominate the public narrative , then voting necessarily reflects the will of those plutocrats , not the people .
Even if you changed everything else that is wrong with the current system , nothing would change if the plutocratic class @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people think and vote .
You can fix America ’ s garbage election integrity , end gerrymandering , even get money out of politics , but as long as the plutocratic class is still using its wealth to manipulate public thought in support of its interests , people would keep voting the way they ’ re manipulated to vote .
Manipulation is a key ingredient in any long-term abusive relationship , because people don ’ t tend to stay in abusive situations unless they are manipulated into doing so .
This is true @ @ @ @ @ @ @ partnerships , governments , or globe-spanning power structures .
We don ’ t use the power of our numbers to end this abusive relationship where we are at the whim of crushing austerity , exploitative neoliberalism , endless war and rapacious ecocide , because we ’ re being manipulated into staying .
And , just like with any other abusive relationship , there comes a time to leave before it ’ s too late .
That time is now .
We can begin by expanding awareness of what ’ s really going on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by sharing truthful information with others .
In so doing , we stand a chance at making ourselves impossible to propagandize effectively and using our strength in numbers to force real change .

A new Reuters/Ipsos poll has reportedly found that a majority of Americans believe the completely discredited narrative that the Russian government paid Taliban-linked fighters to kill the occupying forces of the US and its allies in Afghanistan.
“A majority of Americans believe that Russia paid the Taliban to kill U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan last year amid negotiations to end the war, and more than half want to respond with new economic sanctions against Moscow, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released on Wednesday,” Reuters reports.
“Overall, 60% of Americans said they found reports of Russian bounties on American soldiers to be ‘very’ or ‘somewhat’ believable, while 21% said they were not credible and the rest were unsure,” says Reuters.
Those 21 percent are objectively correct: the story is not credible, and it’s not even close. Gareth Porter shows in The Grayzone how the “Bountygate” narrative is so utterly baseless that even US intelligence agencies have dismissed it, Joe Lauria of Consortium News explains how it doesn’t make any sense on its face, and FAIR’s Alan MacLeod breaks down the appalling journalistic malpractice that went into circulating this incredibly thinly sourced story to the mainstream public.
The story advances no solid facts or verified information. What it does advance is pre-existing imperialist agendas like remaining in Afghanistan, killing the last of the remaining nuclear deals with Moscow, and manufacturing public support for new Russia sanctions.
Most Americans believe Russia targeted U.S. soldiers, want sanctions in response, Reuters/Ipsos poll shows https://t.co/NWvdxquRMK pic.twitter.com/t18vMlEovx — Reuters (@Reuters) July 8, 2020
And yet a majority of people believed it, and still believe it. The narrative that Russia paid Taliban fighters to kill occupying forces is now regarded as an established fact in many key circles, despite being backed by literally zero facts.
If people were as objective and adept at critical thinking as we tend to believe we are, the mass media’s unconscionable facilitation of a brazen cold war psyop would by itself have killed off all public trust in the institution of mass news reporting. But people are not as objective and adept at critical thinking as we tend to believe we are.
People have many cognitive biases which distort our ability to objectively process information and understand events, including one which causes us to believe something is true just because they’ve heard it said multiple times. This makes us easily susceptible to mass media propaganda, where our encounters with daily news headlines can shape our perception of what’s going on in the world regardless of whether or not those headlines are backed by actual facts.
"Bounty-Gate" is the Pentagon's main chance to keep the U.S. war in #Afghanistan going for a while longer. Push-back against those in Congress exploiting this fraud is needed to deprive the Pentagon and its allies from succeeding in this scheme. https://t.co/OUPC6IpUgc — Gareth Porter (@GarethPorter) July 8, 2020
This latest poll is a perfect example of how the plutocrat-owned media manipulate public opinion in the interest of establishment agendas using brazen propaganda campaigns, but it is just the most recent example.
Also read: US Government Propaganda Use Against American Citizens Is Officially Legal Now
Over and over and over again we see public perception of what’s going on distorted by lies inserted into their minds by the corporate news media, like when half a year after the invasion of Iraq seven in ten Americans believed Saddam Hussein was responsible for the 9/11 attacks. All it took to trick them into believing this and supporting the invasion was repeatedly mentioning 9/11 and Saddam in the same breath, despite there never being any evidence whatsoever for any such thing.
This kind of manipulation is not rare, it is ubiquitous and ongoing. Every single day the plutocratic media are putting ideas in people’s minds which favor the establishment upon which said plutocrats have built their kingdoms, normalizing the insane status quoand manufacturing support for agendas which bolster it. This is not some delusional conspiracy theory, it’s a well-documented fact to which many mainstream journalists have testified.
As long as this remains the case in our society, democracy cannot exist in any meaningful way. As long as a loose alliance of plutocrats and government operatives are able to consistently manipulate the way a critical mass of people think and vote, then you cannot rightly say that the people are in charge of the fate of their nation.
If the majority is consistently in alignment with the plutocrats whose outsized media influence enables them to dominate the public narrative, then voting necessarily reflects the will of those plutocrats, not the people.
Even if you changed everything else that is wrong with the current system, nothing would change if the plutocratic class retained its ability to manipulate the way people think and vote. You can fix America’s garbage election integrity, end gerrymandering, even get money out of politics, but as long as the plutocratic class is still using its wealth to manipulate public thought in support of its interests, people would keep voting the way they’re manipulated to vote.
Manipulation is a key ingredient in any long-term abusive relationship, because people don’t tend to stay in abusive situations unless they are manipulated into doing so.
This is true whether you’re talking about romantic partnerships, governments, or globe-spanning power structures. We don’t use the power of our numbers to end this abusive relationship where we are at the whim of crushing austerity, exploitative neoliberalism, endless war and rapacious ecocide, because we’re being manipulated into staying.
And, just like with any other abusive relationship, there comes a time to leave before it’s too late. That time is now. We can begin by expanding awareness of what’s really going on, both inwardly in ourselves and outwardly by sharing truthful information with others. In so doing, we stand a chance at making ourselves impossible to propagandize effectively and using our strength in numbers to force real change.


humansarefree--2020-07-10--Farrakhan: Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates Are Trying to ‘Depopulate the Earth’ with Coronavirus Vaccin

Farrakhan: Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates Are Trying to ‘Depopulate the Earth’ with Coronavirus Vaccines

When Big Pharma finally unveils its newfangled vaccines for the Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) as early as this fall , the endgame is to “ depopulate the Earth.
” This is according to Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan , who recently declared that Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci are basically eugenicists trying to get rid of all the “ useless eaters.
” A controversial figure , Farrakhan urged African leaders during his annual Fourth of July address from his headquarters in Chicago to tell their black followers to avoid getting any vaccinations , or medications , for that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Gates or Fauci .
“ I say to my brothers and sisters in Africa , if they come up with a vaccine , be careful , ” Farrakhan proclaimed from his pulpit .
“ Don ’ t let them vaccinate you with their history of treachery through vaccines , through medication .
Do not take their medication.
” The 87-year-old religious activist quickly started to “ trend ” on Twitter following the speech , drawing blacks and whites alike who are skeptical of Big Government “ medicine ” to question whether getting vaccinated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is really a good idea .
Farrakhan has proposed forming a team of independent virologists and epidemiologists to take a closer look at whatever vaccines are eventually rushed to market .
This , he says , will help to determine whether or not they are truly safe and effective .
“ They ’ re making money now , plotting to give seven billion , five-hundred million people a vaccination , ” Farrakhan went on to state , referring to the globalist plot as presented on the infamous Georgia Guidestone to reduce the world @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people .
“ Dr .
Fauci , Bill Gates and Melinda – you want to depopulate the Earth , ” he added .
“ What the hell gave you that right ?
Who are you to sit down with your billions to talk about who can live , and who should die ?
” Echoing what many “ truthers ” have been saying for years now , Farrakhan went on to curse these globalist monsters , declaring publicly that their “ work is coming to an end quickly , because you have sentenced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is now sentencing you to the death that you are sentencing to others , ” Farrakhan went on to say .
As to be expected , some in the so-called “ conservative ” media have responded with antagonism towards Farrakhan , who in the past has been accused of “ anti-Semitism ” for calling out Jewish special interests that he says get a free pass when it comes to steering political narratives .
Ben Shapiro ’ s The Daily Caller is also upset that Farrakhan dared to question the safety and effectiveness of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unfounded allegations about Fauci ’ s handling of the coronavirus pandemic.
” The Daily Caller would appear to support Fauci ’ s agenda , based on these remarks , as well as oppose the “ popular conspiracy theory … that Fauci is prolonging the duration of the coronavirus pandemic by proposing a series of economic lockdowns and social distancing policies until a vaccine is developed.
” This type of globalist rhetoric is nothing new for The Daily Caller , which back in early 2019 got into bed with the vaccine industry by blaming @ @ @ @ @ @ @ outbreaks that were being reported around that time .
Interestingly , The Daily Caller appears to have removed its comment section , at least on this particular article about Farrakhan , which prevents readers from chiming in on what they think about his statements .
Perhaps this news outlet recognizes that its positions on the pandemic , mass vaccination , and “ anti-Semitism ” are not all that popular after all ?

When Big Pharma finally unveils its newfangled jjabs for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) as early as this fall, the endgame is to “depopulate the Earth.”
by Ethan Huff
This is according to Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, who recently declared that Billy Boy and Anthony Fauci are basically eugenicists trying to get rid of all the “useless eaters.”
A controversial figure, Farrakhan urged African leaders during his annual Fourth of July address from his headquarters in Chicago to tell their black followers to avoid getting any vaccinations, or medications, for that matter, developed by the likes of Gates or Fauci.
“I say to my brothers and sisters in Africa, if they come up with a jjab, be careful,” Farrakhan proclaimed from his pulpit. “Don’t let them vaccinate you with their history of treachery through jjabs, through medication. Do not take their medication.”
The 87-year-old religious activist quickly started to “trend” on Twitter following the speech, drawing blacks and whites alike who are skeptical of Big Government “medicine” to question whether getting vaccinated for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) is really a good idea.
Farrakhan has proposed forming a team of independent virologists and epidemiologists to take a closer look at whatever jjabs are eventually rushed to market.
This, he says, will help to determine whether or not they are truly safe and effective.
“They’re making money now, plotting to give seven billion, five-hundred million people a vaccination,” Farrakhan went on to state, referring to the globalist plot as presented on the infamous Georgia Guidestone to reduce the world’s population to just 500 million people.
“Dr. Fauci, Billy Boy and Melinda – you want to depopulate the Earth,” he added.
“What the hell gave you that right? Who are you to sit down with your billions to talk about who can live, and who should die?”
Echoing what many “truthers” have been saying for years now, Farrakhan went on to curse these globalist monsters, declaring publicly that their “work is coming to an end quickly, because you have sentenced billions to death.”
“But God is now sentencing you to the death that you are sentencing to others,” Farrakhan went on to say.
“Conservative” Daily Caller chides Farrakhan, likens him to “anti-vaxxers” making “unfounded allegations”
As to be expected, some in the so-called “conservative” media have responded with antagonism towards Farrakhan, who in the past has been accused of “anti-Semitism” for calling out Jewish special interests that he says get a free pass when it comes to steering political narratives.
Ben Shapiro’s The Daily Caller is also upset that Farrakhan dared to question the safety and effectiveness of jjabs, as well as level “unfounded allegations about Fauci’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic.”
The Daily Caller would appear to support Fauci’s agenda, based on these remarks, as well as oppose the “popular conspiracy theory … that Fauci is prolonging the duration of the coronavirus pandemic by proposing a series of economic lockdowns and social distancing policies until a jjab is developed.”
This type of globalist rhetoric is nothing new for The Daily Caller, which back in early 2019 got into bed with the jjab industry by blaming “anti-vaxxers” for the alleged measles outbreaks that were being reported around that time.
Interestingly, The Daily Caller appears to have removed its comment section, at least on this particular article about Farrakhan, which prevents readers from chiming in on what they think about his statements.
Perhaps this news outlet recognizes that its positions on the pandemic, mass vaccination, and “anti-Semitism” are not all that popular after all?


humansarefree--2020-07-11--NBC Guest Doctor Who Was Suffering from Coronavirus in Hospital in TV Interviews, NEVER HAD Coronavi

NBC Guest Doctor Who Was Suffering from Coronavirus in Hospital in TV Interviews, NEVER HAD Coronavirus!

Dr. Joseph Fair appeared on NBC and the Today Show nearly a dozen times in May during the height of @ @ @ @ @ United States .
Dr. Fair appeared in a hospital bed fighting off the disease with @ @ @ @ @ when he appeared on NBC .
In one segment Dr. Joseph Fair told the Today @ @ @ @ @ can take me down , it can take anybody.
” But it was all a @ @ @ @ @ did not have coronavirus .
An NBC medical expert who was brought on air nearly @ @ @ @ @ his struggle with COVID-19 never had the virus , he revealed this week .
After @ @ @ @ @ in spite of getting negative tests , virologist and NBC News science contributor Dr. Joseph @ @ @ @ @ had tested negative for the antibodies and that the illness that hospitalized him in May @ @ @ @ @ ” Steve Krakauer reported on the developments for his Fourth Watch newsletter .
Read the @ @ @ @ @ )

Dr. Joseph Fair appeared on NBC and the Today Show nearly a dozen times in May during the height of the coronavirus pandemic in the United States.
Dr. Fair appeared in a hospital bed fighting off the disease with oxygen tubes in his nose when he appeared on NBC.
In one segment Dr. Joseph Fair told the Today hosts, “If it can take me down, it can take anybody.”
But it was all a lie. Dr. Joseph Fair did not have coronavirus.
Dr. Fair admitted it this week. Wow!
The Free Beacon reported:
An NBC medical expert who was brought on air nearly a dozen times to detail his struggle with COVID-19 never had the virus, he revealed this week.
After believing he had the coronavirus in spite of getting negative tests, virologist and NBC News science contributor Dr. Joseph Fair tweeted Tuesday that he had tested negative for the antibodies and that the illness that hospitalized him in May “remains an undiagnosed mystery.” Steve Krakauer reported on the developments for his Fourth Watch newsletter.
Read the rest here (via Thegatewaypundit.com)


humansarefree--2020-07-11--Either Way, Bill Gates Wins: As Millions Pulled From WHO, Trump Gives Billions To Gates-Founded GAVI

In mid-May US President Donald Trump announced that the US would be ending their financial support for the World Health Organization ( WHO ) and COVID-19 relief .
The move was lambasted in the mainstream press as an out of touch politician pulling funding from a vital global health organization during the middle of a pandemic .
To Trump ’ s supporters the decision was met with the typical cheering and celebrated as another Trump victory against the “ globalists.
” To understand what is actually going on we need to examine Donald Trump ’ s actions , not his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ start by looking at the funding provided by the US government to the WHO in previous years .
The latest numbers from fiscal year 2018 ( numbers are not available for 2019-20 ) show an estimated $ 281.6 million to the WHO from the US .
The records indicate that after the US government , the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and GAVI , the Vaccine Alliance , are the 2nd and 3rd top financiers of the WHO .
The US defunding the WHO actually tightens the technocrats already firm grip on another @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump stated the US will no longer fund the WHO , the Gates Foundation and GAVI stepped into the top financial role .
Additionally , GAVI was founded by and largely funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in 2000 .
Either way , Bill Gates is the top donor and will continue to expand his influence and dominance of global health policy .
As reported in Part 2 of my Bill Gates investigation , in 2010 the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation launched the “ Decade of Vaccines ” and called @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Since that time they have only grown their network and influence on WHO , GAVI and other organizations in order to shape public health policy in a way that reaps profits for the Gates themselves .
While Trump ’ s supporters viewed the US withdrawal from WHO financing as a win for nationalism or a black eye to the globalists , the truth is a bit more nuanced .
In early June , the Trump administration declared support for GAVI to the tune of a $ 1.16 billion USD donation .
Trump @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the first ever virtual Global Vaccine Summit .
At this summit GAVI surpassed the goal of $ 7.4 billion , instead raising $ 8.8 billion USD and securing commitments from most major nations around the world .
GAVI even received a $ 5 million dollar donation from the Rockefeller Foundation .
GAVI stated that the funding will go to “ routine immunization programs ” and will also help the public-private partnership “ play a major role in the rollout of a future Covid-19 vaccine.
” More than 25 heads of state and 50 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ private industry attended the fundraising event .
UN Secretary Guterres stated that the vaccine would not be enough and instead called for “ global solidarity…to ensure that every person everywhere gets access to the vaccine.
” Guterres also noted that “ our individual health depends on our collective health.
” It was at this Global Vaccine Summit where a pre-recorded message from Donald Trump was played .
In his video statement Trump said UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson asked him to record a message .
During his short speech , Donald Trump stated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be partnering with you .
We will work hard , we will work strong.
” Trump also called COVID-19 “ mean ” and “ nasty ” and said it has shown “ there are no borders , it doesn ’ t discriminate.
” Trump ’ s support for GAVI was echoed on the Twitter account for the United States Agency for International Development ( USAID ) .
“ USAID echo ’ s @ Realdonaldtrump ‘ s words and is proud to be partnering with @ Gavi by committing $ 1.16 billion to protect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , “ the tweet reads .
( It should be noted that USAID has also been accused of creating fake social media networks in an attempt to foment unrest in foreign nations . )
It was actually USAID who first announced the pledge of US $ 1.16 billion in February .
The Trump administration included that $ 1.16 commitment as part of the budget for Fiscal Years 2020-2023 .
The budget for Fiscal Year 2021 included $ 290 million for GAVI .
Remember that the records from fiscal year 2018 show an estimated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the US .
The Trump administration ’ s announcement of an initial $ 290 million investment easily surpassed the US investment in the WHO .
Over the next three years the US will give more than $ 800 million to GAVI for their vaccination programs .
Once again , this puts Bill Gates and his organizations at the top of the global health pyramid .
So what did Mr. Gates have to say about the success of the Global Vaccine Summit ?
“ Since its inception GAVI has helped vaccinate more than three-quarters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , it ’ s stepping up and saying it ’ s willing to deliver a Covid-19 vaccine as soon as one is available to end the pandemic as soon as possible , ” he said at the Summit .
“ We must also renew our commitment to delivering every life-saving vaccine there is to every child on earth.
” The Trump administration ’ s support for the development of vaccines to fight COVID-19 is also visible in a more recent virtual event organized by Global Citizen and the European Commission .
On June @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Global Goal : Unite for Our Future – The Concert ” which was supported by Bloomberg Philanthropies , Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation , Wellcome Trust , and Corporate Partners Citi , Procter & Gamble , SAP , Verizon and Vodafone .
Once again , the funds raised at the event went to the Gates-founded GAVI .
During this event , Kelly Craft , United States Ambassador to the United Nations announced the US commitment of $ 545 million for GAVI towards COVID-19 relief efforts .
“ Together , we must work in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ manner to build a safer , more resilient world .
We must be the true multilateralist in the best sense of the word , working toward the common good , ” Craft said .
At a May 2020 virtual summit , also organized by the European Commission , the Trump administration committed to giving another $ 775 million in emergency health , humanitarian , economic and development aid for governments , international organizations and charities fighting the pandemic .
At this same event the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation contributed $ 125 million @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of $ 775 million ; the early June announcement of $ 1.16 billion ; and the late June gift of $ 545 million – these taxpayer funded investments will provide abundant resources for GAVI , and subsequently , the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation .
These funds easily outweigh the paltry $ 281.6 million the US was giving to the WHO .
It is important to understand that the WHO is a part of the United Nations , which itself is an “ intergovernmental organization ” that is attempting to replace nation-states as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ global governance schemes .
GAVI is a “ public-private partnership ” where governmental bodies and private organizations partner up to provide some sort of public service .
Neither of these organizations has been elected by the free people of the nations in which they operate .
Despite this fact , the Trump administration is continuing to give billions to GAVI and in doing so , furthering Bill Gates ’ goal to vaccinate 7 billion people .
Trump may have pulled funds from the WHO , but that decision allows Gates to take full @ @ @ @ @ @ @ use US taxpayer dollars to fund vaccine projects , including a rushed vaccine for COVID-19 .
This was likely the plan the whole time .
As we have clearly demonstrated in previous reports , Gates has an outsized influence on the COVID-19 recovery and global health in general .
A 2015 report titled , Philanthropic Power and Development : Who shapes the agenda ?
, examines the influence of global philanthropy and provides examples of the undue influence Gates and others can wield .
The report noted that researchers have been critical of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on global health challenges , “ focusing on disease-specific vertical health interventions ( through vaccines ) , instead of horizontal and holistic approaches ( e.g.
, health system strengthening ) .
” Further , in May 2019 , Gavi CEO Seth Berkley referred to “ anti-vaccine sentiment ” as a disease that needs to be censored from the internet .
Berkley ’ s statements are perfectly in line with Bill Gates ’ vision and the larger agenda of eugenics .
The public can not be allowed to question the safety of vaccines — @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This is why the Trump administration appointed a Big Pharma lackey to head “ Operation Warp Speed , ” Trump ’ s plan to fast track the development of vaccines for COVID-19 .
In May , Trump appointed Moncef Slaoui , a former executive with vaccine manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline , to serve in a volunteer position , assisted by Army Gen. Gustave Perna , the commander of United States Army Materiel Command .
According to the Trump administration , Operation Warp Speed program is focusing on four vaccines , with the hopes of testing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2020 , 200 million by December , and 300 million doses by January .
Slaoui has said he believes the goal of vaccines by January 2021 is a “ credible goal.
” Once again , Gates ’ fingerprints are all over the situation .
Slaoui himself has a long history with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation , sitting on the boards of companies that are connected to the organization .
It appears that despite the public pronouncements of divesting from the WHO or tweets about standing up to the globalists , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to vaccinate every person on the planet .

Just in time for #ExposeBillGates Global Day of Action, The Corbett Report is releasing the full Who Is Billy Boy? documentary in a single upload.
Please help to spread the word about this documentary, including the audio and video downloads and hyperlinked transcript at corbettreport.com/gates
Watch this video on BitChute / LBRY / Minds.com / YouTube


humansarefree--2020-07-11--The CDC May Stop Calling COVID-19 An ‘Epidemic’ Due To A Remarkably Low Death Rate

What Happened : The COVID-19 death rate across the US has now been confirmed to be so low that it ’ s on the edge of no longer being qualified as an epidemic , and therefore the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is poised to soon stop calling the virus an “ epidemic ” as it will no longer match the organizations definition .
The primary reason why confirmed death rates are so low is due to extreme amounts of testing in the United States .
Although most outside the box thinking people and health professionals knew a couple @ @ @ @ @ @ @ extremely low , it has taken up until now for the CDC to admit to this position .
“ Based on death certificate data , the percentage of deaths attributed to pneumonia , influenza or COVID-19 ( PIC ) decreased from 9.0 % during week 25 to 5.9 % during week 26 , representing the tenth week of a declining percentage of deaths due to PIC , ” the agency wrote on its website .
A spokesperson for the CDC stated “ the percentage is currently at the epidemic threshold.
” One could @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , or even if common sense estimation was used , COVID-19 would not qualify as an epidemic according to the CDCs definition .
To the CDC , an “ epidemic ” is “ an increase , often sudden , in the number of cases of a disease above what is normally expected in that population in that area .
We ’ ve only been seeing sharp declines , and in most cases , any increase in cases are non-symptomatic .
There have even been multiple scientists who clearly illustrated this months ago but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government continue to report on ‘ new cases ’ every single day as testing continues .
The challenging part is , they are not sharing how many of these cases are symptomatic or result in any form of hospitalization .
Therefore , simply reporting on how many new confirmed cases there are is doing nothing but rile the public up into fear for no reason .
The vast majority of “ confirmed cases ” are people who have no symptoms and have no idea they even had antibodies for the virus .
Not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ testing .
As many outside mainstream consensus spoke about since late February , testing results show that more people have likely contracted COVID-19 than testing data reflects .
This means even way back then , the mortality rate for COVID-19 was lower than any of the extreme estimates that came out of government and health agencies .
All of which have been proven wrong along the way .
Those who have questioned the narrative , like us here at CE , have had to deal with shadow banning on social media , fact @ @ @ @ @ @ @ result of reporting on the facts instead of the hysteria .
The sad part is , everything we have reported on and suggested would soon happen did and yet we have been constantly ‘ punished ’ for it .
Death rates were not as high as thought , testing is not accurate , and this virus is not near as serious as it ’ s being made out to be – point blank , there was no need for a lockdown .
But given there was a lockdown , we can look to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that there is likely much more going on here behind the scenes than many people want to admit to .
Further to that , and going deeper , we can ask how this lockdown and entire virus situation was actually serving the collective to see what ’ s really going on in our world and why it might be time to bring about some BIG change .
Remember , it ’ s not the people vs. the deep state , they simply play a role in pushing the evolution of consciousness .
I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ More statistics and events are coming to the surface showing that we have been misled greatly about the recent ‘ pandemic ’ , and even though many people in alternative media and alternative health said since day 1 that this was fishy and made no sense , mainstream media and government continued on .
How is it that people with so few resources and access knew the truth before massive and ‘ trusted ’ sources did ?
Was it another catalyst for humanity to begin questioning why they trust these sources ?
Was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ listening to well backed and grounded ‘ alternative ’ or ‘ conspiracy ’ ideas as they consistently turn out to be true ?
Given the fact our infrastructures collapsed so quickly , is it an opportunity for us to re-imagine our world ?
Re-imagine what ’ s possible and truly question the type of world we wish to live in ?
Is it time for us to activate self responsibility and begin setting aside the parent-child relationship we have with government ?

What Happened: The COVID-19 death rate across the US has now been confirmed to be so low that it’s on the edge of no longer being qualified as an epidemic, and therefore the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is poised to soon stop calling the virus an “epidemic” as it will no longer match the organizations definition.
by Joe Martino
The primary reason why confirmed death rates are so low is due to extreme amounts of testing in the United States.
Although most outside the box thinking people and health professionals knew a couple weeks in that the death rate was extremely low, it has taken up until now for the CDC to admit to this position.
“Based on death certificate data, the percentage of deaths attributed to pneumonia, influenza or COVID-19 (PIC) decreased from 9.0% during week 25 to 5.9% during week 26, representing the tenth week of a declining percentage of deaths due to PIC,” the agency wrote on its website.
A spokesperson for the CDC stated “the percentage is currently at the epidemic threshold.”
One could assume that as more tests are completed, or even if common sense estimation was used, COVID-19 would not qualify as an epidemic according to the CDCs definition.
To the CDC, an “epidemic” is “an increase, often sudden, in the number of cases of a disease above what is normally expected in that population in that area.
We’ve only been seeing sharp declines, and in most cases, any increase in cases are non-symptomatic.
There have even been multiple scientists who clearly illustrated this months ago but were ridiculed for it.
Media and government continue to report on ‘new cases’ every single day as testing continues. The challenging part is, they are not sharing how many of these cases are symptomatic or result in any form of hospitalization.
Therefore, simply reporting on how many new confirmed cases there are is doing nothing but rile the public up into fear for no reason.
The vast majority of “confirmed cases” are people who have no symptoms and have no idea they even had antibodies for the virus. Not to mention the likely inaccuracy of COVID testing.
Why it matters:
As many outside mainstream consensus spoke about since late February, testing results show that more people have likely contracted COVID-19 than testing data reflects.
This means even way back then, the mortality rate for COVID-19 was lower than any of the extreme estimates that came out of government and health agencies. All of which have been proven wrong along the way.
Those who have questioned the narrative, like us here at CE, have had to deal with shadow banning on social media, fact checking fallacies, and demonetization as a result of reporting on the facts instead of the hysteria.
The sad part is, everything we have reported on and suggested would soon happen did and yet we have been constantly ‘punished’ for it.
Death rates were not as high as thought, testing is not accurate, and this virus is not near as serious as it’s being made out to be – point blank, there was no need for a lockdown.
But given there was a lockdown, we can look to either complete government incompetency or the fact that there is likely much more going on here behind the scenes than many people want to admit to.
Further to that, and going deeper, we can ask how this lockdown and entire virus situation was actually serving the collective to see what’s really going on in our world and why it might be time to bring about some BIG change.
Remember, it’s not the people vs. the deep state, they simply play a role in pushing the evolution of consciousness. I cover this in great detail here.
The Takeaway
More statistics and events are coming to the surface showing that we have been misled greatly about the recent ‘pandemic’, and even though many people in alternative media and alternative health said since day 1 that this was fishy and made no sense, mainstream media and government continued on.
How is it that people with so few resources and access knew the truth before massive and ‘trusted’ sources did? Was it another catalyst for humanity to begin questioning why they trust these sources?
Was it another catalyst for people to begin listening to well backed and grounded ‘alternative’ or ‘conspiracy’ ideas as they consistently turn out to be true?
Given the fact our infrastructures collapsed so quickly, is it an opportunity for us to re-imagine our world?
Re-imagine what’s possible and truly question the type of world we wish to live in?
Is it time for us to activate self responsibility and begin setting aside the parent-child relationship we have with government?
It’s all been a catalyst.


humansarefree--2020-07-11--Stanford Professor About Covid-19: ‘For People Younger Than 45, the Infection Fatality Rate is Almos

Stanford Professor About Covid-19: ‘For People Younger Than 45, the Infection Fatality Rate is Almost 0%’

John P. A. Ioannidis , a professor of medicine and epidemiology at Stanford University is one of many scientists around the world , and one of several from Stanford University , who has been telling the world that the new coronavirus , so far according to the data , is not as dangerous as it ’ s being made out to be by mainstream media .
For example , earlier on in the pandemic he published an article titled “ A fiasco in the making ?
As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold , we are making decisions without reliable data.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ that there is simply not enough data to make claims about reported case fatality rate .
He stated that rates , “ like the official 3.4 % rate from the World Health Organization , cause horror — and are meaningless.
” This is exactly what these numbers did .
In fact , they were the basis and justification for the lockdown .
It turns out he was right .
The idea that the infection rate is much larger than previously thought seems to be well accepted and clear in the scientific community , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the same over the past few months .
Not long ago , several academics from the Stanford School of Medicine , including Ioannidis , suggested that COVID-19 has a similar infection fatality rate as seasonal influenza based on the data they found in their study .
In a recent interview with Greek Reporter , Ioannidis estimated that about 150-300 million or more people have already been infected by COVID-19 around the world , far more than the 10 million documented cases .
He warned that “ the draconian lockdowns imposed in many countries @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was intended.
” He told the Greek Reporter that “ the lockdown measures have increased the number of people at risk of starvation to 1.1 billion , and they are putting at risk millions of lives .
He isn ’ t the only world renowned scientist to call these measures “ draconian ” … There are many of them , a large majority of whom have been censored by platforms like YouTube and Facebook .
Since when are the expert opinions and research of scientists in this field constantly censored simply because they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ regulatory agencies and World Health Organization ?
Why is there a digital authoritarian “ fact-checker ” patrolling the internet telling people what is and what isn ’ t ?
Not only are people experiencing huge economic impacts , but it ’ s also having a health impact .
A new article published in the British Medical Journal has suggested that quarantine measures in the United Kingdom as a result of the new coronavirus may have already killed more UK seniors than the coronavirus has during the peak of the virus .
You can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s what Ioannidis , had to say about the infection fatality rate now that things have progressed further : “ 0.05 % to 1 % is a reasonable range for what the data tell us now for the infection fatality rate , with a median of about 0.25 % .
The death rate in a given country depends a lot on the age-structure , who are the people infected , and how they are managed .
“ For people younger than 45 , the infection fatality rate is almost 0 % .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ probably about 0.05-0.3 % .
For those above 70 , it escalates substantially , to 1 % or higher for those over 85 .
For frail , debilitated elderly people with multiple health problems who are infected in nursing homes , it can go up to 25 % during major outbreaks in these facilities.
” ( source ) The idea that the death rate is far lower than original estimates , and even far lower than what the numbers show now seems to be quite obvious… Even the CDC recently announced that they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” due to the remarkably low death rate .
The number of controversies surrounding the coronavirus is quite revealing .
Even people whose deaths are marked as COVID deaths may not have died as a result of the coronavirus .
You can read more about that here .
This , along with the high infection rate even drives the infection mortality rate [ to very-very low levels ] .
Russian COVID Chief : ‘ It ’ s Just The Flu With Minimal Mortality .
Why Has The Whole World Been Destroyed ?
That @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all begs the question , are all of the measures that our federal health regulatory agencies forcing us to adopt actually necessary ?
Are they even good for us ?
Is this really about the virus , or are we simply having our perception manipulated by big media and powerful people , just as we have with regards to a number of other topics , like ‘ the war on terror , ’ for example ?
Why is there so much information showing that masks , for example , should not really be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ measures that we ’ ve taken for this virus , but don ’ t do it for all of the other severe respiratory viruses that infect and kill millions of people around the world every single year ?
Never in history have we experienced such a collective distrust for health authorities that we rely on to provide us with truthful information .
As a result , more people are starting to think for themselves instead of believing what they are told .
The coronavirus , just like 9/11 , is really contributing to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even more people become aware of the deceit corruption…

John P. A. Ioannidis, a professor of medicine and epidemiology at Stanford University is one of many scientists around the world, and one of several from Stanford University, who has been telling the world that the new coronavirus, so far according to the data, is not as dangerous as it’s being made out to be by mainstream media.
For example, earlier on in the pandemic he published an article titled “A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data.“
In the article, he argues that there is simply not enough data to make claims about reported case fatality rate. He stated that rates, “like the official 3.4% rate from the World Health Organization, cause horror — and are meaningless.”
This is exactly what these numbers did. In fact, they were the basis and justification for the lockdown.
It turns out he was right.
The idea that the infection rate is much larger than previously thought seems to be well accepted and clear in the scientific community, and multiple studies have come out emphasizing the same over the past few months.
Not long ago, several academics from the Stanford School of Medicine, including Ioannidis, suggested that COVID-19 has a similar infection fatality rate as seasonal influenza based on the data they found in their study.
In a recent interview with Greek Reporter, Ioannidis estimated that about 150-300 million or more people have already been infected by COVID-19 around the world, far more than the 10 million documented cases.
He warned that “the draconian lockdowns imposed in many countries may have the opposite effect of what was intended.”
He told the Greek Reporter that “the lockdown measures have increased the number of people at risk of starvation to 1.1 billion, and they are putting at risk millions of lives.
He isn’t the only world renowned scientist to call these measures “draconian”… There are many of them, a large majority of whom have been censored by platforms like YouTube and Facebook.
Since when are the expert opinions and research of scientists in this field constantly censored simply because they oppose the views of our federal health regulatory agencies and World Health Organization?
Why is there a digital authoritarian “fact-checker” patrolling the internet telling people what is and what isn’t?
Not only are people experiencing huge economic impacts, but it’s also having a health impact.
A new article published in the British Medical Journal has suggested that quarantine measures in the United Kingdom as a result of the new coronavirus may have already killed more UK seniors than the coronavirus has during the peak of the virus. You can read more about that here.
Here’s what Ioannidis, had to say about the infection fatality rate now that things have progressed further:
“0.05% to 1% is a reasonable range for what the data tell us now for the infection fatality rate, with a median of about 0.25%. The death rate in a given country depends a lot on the age-structure, who are the people infected, and how they are managed.
“For people younger than 45, the infection fatality rate is almost 0%. For 45 to 70, it is probably about 0.05-0.3%. For those above 70, it escalates substantially, to 1% or higher for those over 85. For frail, debilitated elderly people with multiple health problems who are infected in nursing homes, it can go up to 25% during major outbreaks in these facilities.” (source)
The idea that the death rate is far lower than original estimates, and even far lower than what the numbers show now seems to be quite obvious…
Even the CDC recently announced that they may stop calling COVID-19 an “epidemic” due to the remarkably low death rate.
The number of controversies surrounding the coronavirus is quite revealing. Even people whose deaths are marked as COVID deaths may not have died as a result of the coronavirus. You can read more about that here. This, along with the high infection rate even drives the infection mortality rate [to very-very low levels].
Russian COVID Chief: ‘It’s Just The Flu With Minimal Mortality. Why Has The Whole World Been Destroyed? That I Don’t Know.’
This all begs the question, are all of the measures that our federal health regulatory agencies forcing us to adopt actually necessary? Are they even good for us?
Is this really about the virus, or are we simply having our perception manipulated by big media and powerful people, just as we have with regards to a number of other topics, like ‘the war on terror,’ for example?
Why is there so much information showing that masks, for example, should not really be mandatory?
Why have we taken the measures that we’ve taken for this virus, but don’t do it for all of the other severe respiratory viruses that infect and kill millions of people around the world every single year?
Never in history have we experienced such a collective distrust for health authorities that we rely on to provide us with truthful information.
As a result, more people are starting to think for themselves instead of believing what they are told.
The coronavirus, just like 9/11, is really contributing to another massive shift in consciousness, where even more people become aware of the deceit corruption…
By Arjun Walia (excerpts)


humansarefree--2020-07-11--FDA: 14 Hand Sanitizers Are Toxic and Potentially Deadly

The Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) is responsible for protecting Americans from harmful products .
Their track record isn ’ t great ( see 1 , 2 ) .
Their reputation isn ’ t great either .
They ’ ve even been blamed by experts and whistleblowers for significantly contributing to the Opioid Crisis .
Recently , the agency warned that 9 hand sanitizers are toxic and potentially deadly if absorbed by the body .
They ’ ve just added more to that list .
( B.N .
Frank ) FDA adds to list of hand sanitizers to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Texas ( KAMR/KCIT ) — The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has added five more hand sanitizers to its list of products that have been found to contain a substance that can be potentially fatal when absorbed through the skin or ingested .
In a statement , the FDA issued a warning to consumers and health care providers about a “ sharp ” increase in hand sanitizer found to contain methanol contamination in products containing ethanol , also known as ethyl alcohol .
“ Methanol , or wood alcohol , is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ through the skin or ingested and can be life-threatening when ingested , ” the FDA said .
On July 2 , the FDA identified the following hand sanitizer products containing methanol : Previously , the FDA said hand sanitizer manufactured by Esk Biochem SA de CV in Mexico should not be used .
The FDA has listed the following nine products manufactured by Esk Biochem : The FDA says it tested samples of Lavar Gel and CleanCare No Germ .
Lavar Gel was found to contain 81 % ( v/v ) methanol and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Germ contained 28 % ( v/v ) methanol .
Those who have been exposed to hand sanitizer containing methanol should call 911 and seek immediate care .
“ Substantial methanol exposure can result in nausea , vomiting , headache , blurred vision , permanent blindness , seizures , coma , permanent damage to the nervous system or death , ” the FDA said in the statement .
“ Although all persons using these products on their hands are at risk , young children who accidentally ingest these products and adolescents and adults who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ethanol ) substitute are most at risk for methanol poisoning.
” If you have any of these products , the FDA says to dispose of them immediately in appropriate hazardous waste containers .
Do not flush or pour them down the drain .

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responsible for protecting Americans from harmful products. Their track record isn’t great (see 1, 2).
Their reputation isn’t great either. They’ve even been blamed by experts and whistleblowers for significantly contributing to the Opioid Crisis. Recently, the agency warned that 9 hand sanitizers are toxic and potentially deadly if absorbed by the body. They’ve just added more to that list. (B.N. Frank)
From WGN:
FDA adds to list of hand sanitizers to avoid, making it 14 total
AMARILLO, Texas (KAMR/KCIT) — The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has added five more hand sanitizers to its list of products that have been found to contain a substance that can be potentially fatal when absorbed through the skin or ingested.
In a statement, the FDA issued a warning to consumers and health care providers about a “sharp” increase in hand sanitizer found to contain methanol contamination in products containing ethanol, also known as ethyl alcohol.
“Methanol, or wood alcohol, is a substance that can be toxic when absorbed through the skin or ingested and can be life-threatening when ingested,” the FDA said.
On July 2, the FDA identified the following hand sanitizer products containing methanol:
Grupo Insoma’s Hand Sanitizer Gel Unscented, 70% alcohol)
Transliquid Technologies’ Mystic Shield Protection Hand Sanitizer
Soluciones Cosmeticas’ Bersih Hand Sanitizer Gel Fragrance Free and Antiseptic Alcohol 70% Topical Solution Hand Sanitizer
Tropicosmeticos’ Britz Hand Sanitizer Ethyl Alcohol 70%
Previously, the FDA said hand sanitizer manufactured by Esk Biochem SA de CV in Mexico should not be used.
The FDA has listed the following nine products manufactured by Esk Biochem:
All-Clean Hand Sanitizer (NDC: 74589-002-01)
Esk Biochem Hand Sanitizer (NDC: 74589-007-01)
CleanCare NoGerm Advanced Hand Sanitizer 75% Alcohol (NDC: 74589-008-04)
Lavar 70 Gel Hand Sanitizer (NDC: 74589-006-01)
The Good Gel Antibacterial Gel Hand Sanitizer (NDC: 74589-010-10)
CleanCare NoGerm Advanced Hand Sanitizer 80% Alcohol (NDC: 74589-005-03)
CleanCare NoGerm Advanced Hand Sanitizer 75% Alcohol (NDC: 74589-009-01)
CleanCare NoGerm Advanced Hand Sanitizer 80% Alcohol (NDC: 74589-003-01)
Saniderm Advanced Hand Sanitizer (NDC: 74589-001-01)
Declare Your Independence! Profit outside the rigged system! Protect yourself from tyranny and economic collapse. Learn to live free and spread peace!
Counter Markets Newsletter – Trends & Strategies for Maximum Freedom
The FDA says it tested samples of Lavar Gel and CleanCare No Germ. Lavar Gel was found to contain 81% (v/v) methanol and no ethyl alcohol, and CleanCare No Germ contained 28% (v/v) methanol.
Those who have been exposed to hand sanitizer containing methanol should call 911 and seek immediate care.
“Substantial methanol exposure can result in nausea, vomiting, headache, blurred vision, permanent blindness, seizures, coma, permanent damage to the nervous system or death,” the FDA said in the statement.
“Although all persons using these products on their hands are at risk, young children who accidentally ingest these products and adolescents and adults who drink these products as an alcohol (ethanol) substitute are most at risk for methanol poisoning.”
If you have any of these products, the FDA says to dispose of them immediately in appropriate hazardous waste containers. Do not flush or pour them down the drain.


humansarefree--2020-07-12--Head of Emergency Management Says Texans Should Wear Masks Inside Their Own Homes

The head of the Texas Division of Emergency Management gave an interview in which he said that people should wear masks inside their own homes in order to stop the spread of coronavirus .
Appearing on Fox News at Nine , Chief Nim Kidd insisted that people should wear masks indoors if they have potentially exposed themselves to the virus by being outside .
“ We still need people to wear the mask out in public , we still need people to keep social distance and isolation , ” Kidd said .
“ Ryan , the one thing I want @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we need to do that when we ’ re in our homes also.
” “ While we believe the community is doing a great job of following the rules when they are outside the home , we really need to be thinking about doing the same thing when we ’ re inside the home , ” he added .
When host Ryan Wolf asked Kidd if “ people should be wearing masks inside their own homes now , ” he responded that this should happen if someone has been “ out in public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of July celebration and hasn ’ t “ decontaminated ” when they arrive home “ Although Kidd shied away from saying residents must wear masks in their home , he said it needs to be heavily considered , ” reports News4SanAntonio .
“ In the interview , he cited how some people may be going out for holidays or parties , but not considering what they may be bringing in their homes.
” As we previously highlighted , this is not the first example of health authorities trying to police people ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Some Californians are calling 911 if they hear their neighbors loudly coughing or sneezing , with paramedics being dispatched to homes in some cases .
“ Coachella Valley police departments say they ’ ve started fielding 911 reports from concerned callers convinced a neighbor ’ s overly loud sneeze or hacking cough is proof the person has the virus , ” reported the Desert Sun .
If health authorities are now moving towards patrolling behavior inside the confines of private property due to COVID-19 hysteria , how far away are mandatory vaccinations ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ media is continuing to peddle alarmist hysteria by hyping rising coronavirus cases , despite the fact that the death rate has been consistently falling for over two months across the country .

The head of the Texas Division of Emergency Management gave an interview in which he said that people should wear masks inside their own homes in order to stop the spread of coronavirus.
Appearing on Fox News at Nine, Chief Nim Kidd insisted that people should wear masks indoors if they have potentially exposed themselves to the virus by being outside.
“We still need people to wear the mask out in public, we still need people to keep social distance and isolation,” Kidd said. “Ryan, the one thing I want to try to get across today is we need to do that when we’re in our homes also.”
“While we believe the community is doing a great job of following the rules when they are outside the home, we really need to be thinking about doing the same thing when we’re inside the home,” he added.
When host Ryan Wolf asked Kidd if “people should be wearing masks inside their own homes now,” he responded that this should happen if someone has been “out in public,” for example for a 4th of July celebration and hasn’t “decontaminated” when they arrive home
“Although Kidd shied away from saying residents must wear masks in their home, he said it needs to be heavily considered,” reports News4SanAntonio.
“In the interview, he cited how some people may be going out for holidays or parties, but not considering what they may be bringing in their homes.”
As we previously highlighted, this is not the first example of health authorities trying to police people’s behavior inside their homes over coronavirus.
Some Californians are calling 911 if they hear their neighbors loudly coughing or sneezing, with paramedics being dispatched to homes in some cases.
“Coachella Valley police departments say they’ve started fielding 911 reports from concerned callers convinced a neighbor’s overly loud sneeze or hacking cough is proof the person has the virus,” reported the Desert Sun.
If health authorities are now moving towards patrolling behavior inside the confines of private property due to COVID-19 hysteria, how far away are mandatory vaccinations?
As we have previously highlighted, the media is continuing to peddle alarmist hysteria by hyping rising coronavirus cases, despite the fact that the death rate has been consistently falling for over two months across the country.
Reference: Summit.news