humansarefree--2020-11-22--John Kerry Says Great Reset is Needed to Stop Rise of Populism

Former Secretary of State John Kerry attended a panel discussion at the World Economic Forum during which he asserted that a great reset was urgently needed to stop the rise of populism .
Kerry vowed that under a Biden administration , America would rejoin the job-killing Paris Climate Agreement but that this was “ not enough.
” “ The notion of a reset is more important than ever before , ” Kerry said .
“ I personally believe … we ’ re at the dawn of an extremely exciting time.
” The former Senator made it clear that this “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ re-branding of the same new world order that has faced stiff resistance for the past two decades , is necessary to extinguish populism .
“ I think Europe has to look at that with Brexit and the rising national populism — nationalistic populism , ” said Kerry .
“ Which is really one of the priorities that we all have to address .
You can ’ t dismiss it.
” Speaking about how Trump increased his vote in 2020 , Kerry noted , “ What astounds me is that as many people still @ @ @ @ @ @ @ breach of law and order and breaking the standards and … I think that , the underlying reason for that is something that everybody has to examine.
” European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen also welcomed the prospect of Biden as a “ friend in the White House ” to the globalists and said the two entities would work on “ a new rulebook for the digital economy and the digital society.
” “ The need for global cooperation and this acceleration of change will both be drivers of the Great Reset @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unprecedented opportunity , ” said von der Leyen .
As we have exhaustively documented , “ The Great Reset ” is merely the latest incarnation of the agenda to centralize power into the hands of a tiny elite , disenfranchising Americans , lowering their living standards and forcing them to submit to a social credit score system that will eliminate all privacy and personal autonomy .
As we reported yesterday , legacy media outlets like the New York Times are still claiming the “ Great Reset ” is a “ conspiracy theory ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
For a full break down of what “ The Great Reset ” truly represents , watch the interview below :

Former Secretary of State John Kerry attended a panel discussion at the World Economic Forum during which he asserted that a great reset was urgently needed to stop the rise of populism.
Kerry vowed that under a Biden administration, America would rejoin the job-killing Paris Climate Agreement but that this was “not enough.”
“The notion of a reset is more important than ever before,” Kerry said. “I personally believe … we’re at the dawn of an extremely exciting time.”
The former Senator made it clear that this “reset,” which is merely a re-branding of the same new world order that has faced stiff resistance for the past two decades, is necessary to extinguish populism.
“I think Europe has to look at that with Brexit and the rising national populism — nationalistic populism,” said Kerry.
“Which is really one of the priorities that we all have to address. You can’t dismiss it.”
Speaking about how Trump increased his vote in 2020, Kerry noted,
“What astounds me is that as many people still voted for the level of chaos and breach of law and order and breaking the standards and … I think that, the underlying reason for that is something that everybody has to examine.”
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen also welcomed the prospect of Biden as a “friend in the White House” to the globalists and said the two entities would work on “a new rulebook for the digital economy and the digital society.”
“The need for global cooperation and this acceleration of change will both be drivers of the Great Reset. And I see this as an unprecedented opportunity,” said von der Leyen.
As we have exhaustively documented, “The Great Reset” is merely the latest incarnation of the agenda to centralize power into the hands of a tiny elite, disenfranchising Americans, lowering their living standards and forcing them to submit to a social credit score system that will eliminate all privacy and personal autonomy.
As we reported yesterday, legacy media outlets like the New York Times are still claiming the “Great Reset” is a “conspiracy theory” even as world leaders openly announce it.
For a full break down of what “The Great Reset” truly represents, watch the interview below:
Source: Summit.news


humansarefree--2020-11-22--Hundreds of NHS Staff Form ‘NHS Workers for Choice’ Group to Oppose Mandatory Vaccines Label New Cov

Hundreds of NHS Staff Form ‘NHS Workers for Choice’ Group to Oppose Mandatory Vaccines Label New Covid Jabs ‘Poison’

NHS Workers for Choice , No Restrictions for Declining a Vaccine insist they are not an anti-vaccine group but fear a coronavirus vaccine is a new ‘ frozen virus ’ NHS and care home staff in their hundreds have formed a group opposed to vaccinations , wearing masks and testing in hospitals .
The 250 plus-member strong group [ update : 342 ] , “ NHS Workers for Choice , No Restrictions for Declining a Vaccine , ” includes a GP , several A & E nurses , healthcare assistants , lab workers , and care home staff .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ group and exists to support healthcare workers , but The Times found posts comparing the Pfizer-BionTech coronavirus vaccine to “ poison ” .
According to the Facebook group , the particular vaccine was a new frozen virus , similar to smallpox , to be “ unleashed ” on the world .
One member who works in a GP ’ s surgery , said that she would rather quit than help with a vaccination programme which will be first rolled out to the elderly and healthcare workers .
She wrote : “ NHS staff @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be gone .
NHS gone .
Population under reconstruction .
Welcome to the new world order.
” Researchers have found that the more people read misinformation about vaccines online , the fewer people are likely to get vaccinated .
Health secretary Matt Hancock announced last weekend , new measures to tackle disinformation , saying : “ We want users to have greater access to reliable and scientifically accurate information on vaccines from trusted sources like the NHS so they can make informed decisions to protect themselves and their loved ones.
” Kate Shemirani @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Royal College of Nursing in July for claiming that the pandemic is a deliberate cull .
Mohammed Iqbal Adil , a surgeon who said that Covid-19 was a hoax , was interim suspended as a result of an Interim Orders Tribunal hearing with the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service .
Michael Fitzpatrick , a GP and trustee of the charity Sense About Science , said : “ It is saddening , though perhaps not surprising , that a small number of health professionals are giving their support to the anti-vax campaign .
“ No @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disciplinary measures … These should be resisted … in face of the challenges of the pandemic we need more public discussion and debate , not less.
” Letters and legal advice on how to avoid wearing a mask in hospitals , how to decline testing and even how to get out of the track-and-trace system are shared with members .
Labour has called on the government to “ bring forward legislation that would include financial and criminal penalties for companies that fail to act to stamp out dangerous anti-vaccine content ” .
[ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ financial and criminal penalties not against the people , but against the vaccine makers who harm ( sometimes for life ) and even kill innocent people with their vaccines .
Right now — as it has been for a very long time , — vaccine makers have an OUTRAGEOUS legal immunity .
This has to change !
Bill Gates is on record saying that 700,000 people will be harmed or killed by the Covid-19 vaccines .
Those willing to risk it can go ahead and take the shot , because nobody is stopping @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they should remember that the infection mortality rate is very similar to that of the seasonal flu , and that almost nobody under the age of 45 is at risk , unless they have very serious underlying health problems .
Given the facts , of course there are going to be a lot of people who will refuse to take the shot — some because they are not in the risk group so they don ’ t need it , and others because they don ’ t want to risk being injected with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and which was also very rushed to the market — and it ’ s their right to do so .
We are all protected by the Nuremberg Code and there shouldn ’ t be any debate on the subject .
No government can force anyone who has reached legal adulthood to be vaccinated with something that can cause harm or death . ]

The new year is almost here and it’s often a time when we all start to think about what we want to change for the next year. I’ve never been much a fan of the whole cliche of changing because of the new year, but why not embrace it as a time where we can make change?
Do a quick reflection right now. Do you feel like you have followed your dreams and passions this past year? Do you feel you got caught up in the stresses of life quite often? Did you feel judgement, negative self talk and anger were a big part of your days?
Reflecting on how you’ve felt over your year and being honest with yourself about it gives you the chance to know how to adjust and move forward from this moment forward whether it be the new year or not.
I’ve found in my own life that if I don’t pay attention to how I feel, what I create, what’s playing out in my life and take responsibility for it, it doesn’t change.
It stays the same, I experience the same emotions or stagnant feelings, and I don’t move forward. But the moment I decide to take it into my own hands, I see how much I’m not a victim to what happens.
11 Things to Let Go Of Before the New Year
1. Stop all the negative self talk – It’s first because it’s probably one of the most important. The more we talk poorly about ourselves to ourselves or others, the more we disempower ourselves and empower all the things we wish to adjust about ourselves. Observe it, take note of it, and kick it. It’s not helping you.
2. Choose one bad eating habit and kick it! – Taking care of and fueling your vessel is one of the most important things we can do in life to stay mentally, emotionally and spiritually healthy. Pick one of your worst eating habits and aim to cut it out completely in 3 months.
Whatever it might be, be honest with yourself and make it happen. Then take on the next bad eating habit in 3 months.
3. Let go of chasing ‘success’ – So often we put up goals or plans for ourselves yet have this tiny limited scope of what success is. Next thing you know we bring stress, worry and fear into the equation throughout the whole journey because we may not be totally in line to hit this pin prick point of what success looks like to us.
Instead, do your best to take the steps needed to get to where you want to go, but let go of the lure of success and what it looks like and means. There’s no such thing as failure. (more)
4. Kick the idea that you cannot achieve or follow your dreams – So often we have our ideas of what we are excited or passionate about, but let it go because we think we can’t do it or because it’s unrealistic. Instead of believing every word of that, take ONE step.
One step towards making your passion or your dreams happen. The one step will lead to the next and the next, but you have to take the first one. Plan out that first step and take it!
5. Let go of the idea that you should run from your problems – We often get into this mentality that we just need to “get over it.” In theory this sounds sorta good, you move on from things that happen in the past or something to that effect.
But by just forgetting about it, did we really move on? No, it gets triggered again later or lies dormant as a resented event etc. Instead, let’s face our problems and truly move past them. Journal about it, talk to someone else about it.
Put the cards on the table to someone who cares about you and who can help you move past it. Pick someone who will see the bigger picture and be honest with you. You have all it takes to move past what challenges you.
6. Stop comparing yourself to others – This is a big one. So often we are looking at others and using what they have, do or are to compare it against us and make up a story. This whole game can make us sad or feel down about ourselves or it can feed our ego in a big way. Let it go, respect everyone’s journey, including your own and stop the need to compare yourself to others.
7. Stop judging others – Judging other people can become a habit and an addiction. It’s like something we can’t stop doing sometimes! Take a moment the next time you judge someone and observe it. Ask yourself why you did it, how did it make you feel? Etc. Make a conscious effort to stop. (more)
8. Stop the blame game – Blaming and pointing fingers when it comes to our challenges or what happens to us doesn’t allow us to look at and observe how we might have created or aligned with an experience to help make it happen. I’m not saying there’s no such things others can do to hurt you, I’m simply saying take responsibility for how you feel and don’t even point blame, it doesn’t help us.
9. Stop worrying and trying so hard to fit in and be accepted – This is something far too many of us do just to save face and not be “the weird one.” The reality is, it’s more ‘weird’ to be a version of yourself that isn’t genuine or real simply because you want to be accepted by others.
It’s a choice you can’t maintain forever and the longer it goes the more uncomfortable you will feel. Be you, accept yourself, be genuine and don’t try to make others do the same when. Let it happen. Trust.
10. Let go of the need to control everything – Sometimes we can’t take a step forward in anything because we don’t know all the answers or all the variables. This is our obsession with control sometimes. Yes, observe a situation and make the best choices available to you, but don’t worry so much about needing to control or know every detail about it.
Learn to leave things up to trust and knowing that things will work out as they need to. This doesn’t mean be reckless, just that you don’t need to control every thing, person and detail.
11. Stop procrastinating – This one goes with everything on the list. Stop putting it all off. Whatever it may be. The changes listed above, the hobby you want to, the career you want to explore, or the thing you want to tell to someone important to you. Stop putting it off and just do it!
By Joe Martino, Collective Evolution;


humansarefree--2020-11-22--US Embassy Cable Proves Smartmatic’s Connection to Venezuela

Among Wikileaks ’ releases of US Government data there is a classified cable that establishes the essential truth of Giuliani Legal Team ’ s charges .
On July 10 , 2006 , the US Embassy ’ s political counselor in Caracas Venezuela , Robert Downes , sent a classified able to Washington .
The cable reports that “ Smartmatic was founded by three Venezuelans , Antonio Mugica , Alberto Anzola , and Roger Pinate.
” “ The Venezuelan-owned Smartmatic Corporation is a riddle both in ownership and operation , complicated by the fact that its machines have overseen several landslide @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hugo Chavez and his supporters .
“ The electronic voting company went from a small technology startup to a market player in just a few years , catapulted by its participation in the August 2004 recall referendum .
“ Smartmatic has claimed to be of U.S. origin , but its true owners — probably elite Venezuelans of several political strains — remain hidden behind a web of holding companies in the Netherlands and Barbados .
“ The Smartmatic machines used in Venezuela are widely suspected of , though never proven conclusively to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of moderate Republicans have expressed the same doubt I initially had .
They are pressuring Trump to prove his case or concede the election to Biden .
The presstitutes are ridiculing the legal team for spinning conspiracy theories .
As I have previously reported , most Republicans are not fighters .
They are members of the Estrablishment and Trump is not .
Most Republicans also are inclined to sweep election fraud under the rug in order to preserve the reputation of American democracy .
This makes it hard for Trump , who has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but not in the Republican Party .
Counselor Downes reports in the cable that a consortium 51 % -owned by Smartmatic received a $ 200,000 equity investment from the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela .
When the investment came to light , it was explained as a “ loan , ” and a Chavez advisor was removed from the consortium ’ s board .
This US Embassy classified cable from 14 years ago proves that the legal team ’ s charges have a basis in facts .
Had I been an adviser to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ against tying in the foreign connection .
The case really depends on proving in court that election laws were violated .
The legal team seems to have sufficient evidence in hand to prove that case .
I do understand why the team brought in the foreign connection .
Having endured years of alleged foreign connections between Trump and Russia , the team couldn ’ t resist giving the same treatment to the Democrats .
The team should have considered that the media , being 100 % against Trump , would hype Russiagate to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

Among Wikileaks’ releases of US Government data there is a classified cable that establishes the essential truth of Giuliani Legal Team’s charges.
On July 10, 2006, the US Embassy’s political counselor in Caracas Venezuela, Robert Downes, sent a classified able to Washington.
The cable reports that “Smartmatic was founded by three Venezuelans, Antonio Mugica, Alberto Anzola, and Roger Pinate.”
The cable reads in part:
“The Venezuelan-owned Smartmatic Corporation is a riddle both in ownership and operation, complicated by the fact that its machines have overseen several landslide (and contested) victories by President Hugo Chavez and his supporters.
“The electronic voting company went from a small technology startup to a market player in just a few years, catapulted by its participation in the August 2004 recall referendum.
“Smartmatic has claimed to be of U.S. origin, but its true owners — probably elite Venezuelans of several political strains — remain hidden behind a web of holding companies in the Netherlands and Barbados.
“The Smartmatic machines used in Venezuela are widely suspected of, though never proven conclusively to be, susceptible to fraud.”
A number of moderate Republicans have expressed the same doubt I initially had. They are pressuring Trump to prove his case or concede the election to Biden. The presstitutes are ridiculing the legal team for spinning conspiracy theories.
As I have previously reported, most Republicans are not fighters. They are members of the Estrablishment and Trump is not. Most Republicans also are inclined to sweep election fraud under the rug in order to preserve the reputation of American democracy.
This makes it hard for Trump, who has a support base in the American people but not in the Republican Party.
Counselor Downes reports in the cable that a consortium 51%-owned by Smartmatic received a $200,000 equity investment from the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela.
When the investment came to light, it was explained as a “loan,” and a Chavez advisor was removed from the consortium’s board.
This US Embassy classified cable from 14 years ago proves that the legal team’s charges have a basis in facts.
Had I been an adviser to the legal team, I would have recommended against tying in the foreign connection. The case really depends on proving in court that election laws were violated.
The legal team seems to have sufficient evidence in hand to prove that case. I do understand why the team brought in the foreign connection.
Having endured years of alleged foreign connections between Trump and Russia, the team couldn’t resist giving the same treatment to the Democrats.
The team should have considered that the media, being 100% against Trump, would hype Russiagate to the hilt, but ridicule #VenezuelaGate.
By Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, Guest writer / Reference: WikiLeaks.org


humansarefree--2020-11-22--Terence McKenna Explains Why Television is the Most Dangerous Addictive Drug in Society

So much insanity is being broadcast into our society that people are beginning to crack and turn on each other .
Just this week we saw how the mainstream media nearly instigated angry leftist mob lynchings by misrepresenting a confrontation between some Catholic high school kids and a Native American elder .
Just a few days prior to that , those on the politically right side of the aisle were in a frenzy of outrage over the contents of a men ’ s razor blade commercial .
People have become totally obsessed with their own beliefs , opinions and biases @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Their reactions to the latest news item are automatic and predictable .
The late iconoclast Terence McKenna pointed out that obsessive and unexamined behavior in pursuit of familiar stimulus ( such as what we see with each moment of media outrage ) is what drug addiction is about .
McKenna went a step further to say that television was the greatest drug ever introduced into society .
What else could persuade people spend an average of 5-7 hours a day sitting in front of the TV ?
All the while consuming , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ scientifically crafted messages of corporate and government propagandists ?
Here , McKenna expounds on the idea that television is a drug that is having negative consequences on individuals and on society at large : “ Unexamined behavior is what is alarming about drug addiction , that people behave like they are obsessed .
Well on that scale , then , the most powerful drug of the late 20th century is television and propaganda .
“ And the way in which we consume propaganda is amazing .
I mean the most intelligent of us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ aloof , are probably junkies through and through when it comes to the media.
” — Terence McKenna He goes on to talk about how being able to see violence on tv has changed the nature of warfare , and that if we are to watch violence , we need to see real footage of it , rather than theatrical violence so that we can understand that we have a responsibility in creating a world in which war and violence is so prevalent .
Here he explains how similar watching television is to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it is shaping our value systems in ways that are very hard for us to suspect or even detect .
I mean television , for example , it ’ s a drug .
It has a series of measurable physiological parameters that are as intrinsically its signature as are teh parameters of heroin or its signature .
“ You sit someone down in front of a TV set and turn it on .
Twenty minutes later come back , sample their blood pressure , their eye movement rate , blood is pooling in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on a certain quality , the stare reflex sets in .
They are thoroughly zoned on a drug.
” — Terence McKenna Here he talks a bit more about the nature of addiction , TV , and our true purpose on this planet as human beings : What do you think ?
Is television and mass media making people crazy ?

So much insanity is being broadcast into our society that people are beginning to crack and turn on each other.
Just this week we saw how the mainstream media nearly instigated angry leftist mob lynchings by misrepresenting a confrontation between some Catholic high school kids and a Native American elder.
Just a few days prior to that, those on the politically right side of the aisle were in a frenzy of outrage over the contents of a men’s razor blade commercial.
People have become totally obsessed with their own beliefs, opinions and biases that their behavior is going completely unexamined. Their reactions to the latest news item are automatic and predictable.
The late iconoclast Terence McKenna pointed out that obsessive and unexamined behavior in pursuit of familiar stimulus (such as what we see with each moment of media outrage) is what drug addiction is about.
McKenna went a step further to say that television was the greatest drug ever introduced into society.
What else could persuade people spend an average of 5-7 hours a day sitting in front of the TV?
All the while consuming, in hypnotic states of mind, the scientifically crafted messages of corporate and government propagandists?
Here, McKenna expounds on the idea that television is a drug that is having negative consequences on individuals and on society at large:
“Unexamined behavior is what is alarming about drug addiction, that people behave like they are obsessed. Well on that scale, then, the most powerful drug of the late 20th century is television and propaganda.
“And the way in which we consume propaganda is amazing. I mean the most intelligent of us, the ones who hold ourselves most aloof, are probably junkies through and through when it comes to the media.” — Terence McKenna
He goes on to talk about how being able to see violence on tv has changed the nature of warfare, and that if we are to watch violence, we need to see real footage of it, rather than theatrical violence so that we can understand that we have a responsibility in creating a world in which war and violence is so prevalent.
Here he explains how similar watching television is to consuming a drug:
“In fact it is shaping our value systems in ways that are very hard for us to suspect or even detect. I mean television, for example, it’s a drug. It has a series of measurable physiological parameters that are as intrinsically its signature as are teh parameters of heroin or its signature.
“You sit someone down in front of a TV set and turn it on. Twenty minutes later come back, sample their blood pressure, their eye movement rate, blood is pooling in their rear end, their breathing takes on a certain quality, the stare reflex sets in. They are thoroughly zoned on a drug.” — Terence McKenna
Here he talks a bit more about the nature of addiction, TV, and our true purpose on this planet as human beings:
What do you think? Is television and mass media making people crazy?
By Dylan Charles, WakingTimes.com


humansarefree--2020-11-22--Attorney Lin Wood: The People Are Going to be Shocked at Level of Pedophilia and Satanic Worship

“ Look , I ’ d like to see in a perfect world , John Durham ’ s report come out and people go to jail .
I ’ d like to see Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell and a lot of people go to jail .
I ’ d like to see what ’ s on Hunter Biden ’ s laptop .
I ’ d like to see those people go to jail .
I ’ d like to see what ’ s on Anthony Weiner ’ s laptop .
I ’ d like to see a lot of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ then when we get to the final phase of the election fraud I ’ d like to see people go to jail .
The one thing I ’ ll say is there ’ ll be an intermingling .
There will be people going to jail I believe who are involved in all of those or some of those same investigations .
“ So there is potentially a great awakening .
The truth has to come out .
I believe it will .
I do not think that you can hide the truth .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ it , every lie will be revealed .
“ This country ’ s going to be shocked when the find the truth about who ’ s been occupying the Oval Office for some periods of years .
They ’ re going to be shocked at the level of pedophilia .
They are going to be shocked at what I believe is going to be a revelation in terms of people who are engaged in satanic worship.
” Watch the interview below ( I ’ ve marked the video to start at the part @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you can play it manually from the beginning if you want to listen to the entire interview ) :

Attorney Lin Wood:
“Look, I’d like to see in a perfect world, John Durham’s report come out and people go to jail. I’d like to see Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell and a lot of people go to jail. I’d like to see what’s on Hunter Biden’s laptop. I’d like to see those people go to jail. I’d like to see what’s on Anthony Weiner’s laptop. I’d like to see a lot of people go to jail.
“And then when we get to the final phase of the election fraud I’d like to see people go to jail. The one thing I’ll say is there’ll be an intermingling. There will be people going to jail I believe who are involved in all of those or some of those same investigations.
“So there is potentially a great awakening. The truth has to come out. I believe it will. I do not think that you can hide the truth. I do say it and I believe it, every lie will be revealed.
“This country’s going to be shocked when the find the truth about who’s been occupying the Oval Office for some periods of years. They’re going to be shocked at the level of pedophilia. They are going to be shocked at what I believe is going to be a revelation in terms of people who are engaged in satanic worship.”
Watch the interview below (I’ve marked the video to start at the part about pedophilia, minute 41:43, but you can play it manually from the beginning if you want to listen to the entire interview):
Sources: YouTube.com; Thegatewaypundit.com; Rumble.com


humansarefree--2020-11-23--Rudy Giuliani: Votes from 28 States Were Sent to Germany and Spain to be Fraudulently Rigged by Smar

Rudy Giuliani: Votes from 28 States Were Sent to Germany and Spain to be Fraudulently Rigged by Smartmatic

What do Venezuela , a third-world socialist nation in economic ruin , and the United States have in common ?
Everything if we are talking about the fraudulent 2020 election .
Believe it or not , the very same voting machines and technologies used to install dictators in Venezuela are now being used in the U.S. to rig elections for Democrats like Joe Biden , whom the mainstream media is already declaring to be the 46th president .
Speaking to Lou Dobbs during a recent interview , Rudy Giuliani , President Trump ’ s lawyer , revealed a number of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to steal the 2020 election , including with the help of Dominion Voting Systems that run Smartmatic software .
In 27 or 28 states , Giuliani explained , votes were tabulated off-shore in Germany and Spain .
And in almost every state where this process occurred , vote “ irregularities ” were observed that appear to have shifted the tallies in favor of Biden .
Giuliani and the Trump team are in the process of fully unraveling this fraud , but we know already that things are changing .
In Nevada , for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ elections in Clark County , which covers Las Vegas , decertified as the winner a Democrat , who was replaced with a Republican .
Confirmed irregularities in the form of improperly verified signatures led to the overturning of that race , and Giuliani says the same thing happened to Trump , the potential ramifications being that Trump could end up winning Nevada .
In Pennsylvania , some 8,000 illegal ballots were identified and Giuliani and his team are pushing to have those thrown out , pending a Supreme Court ruling .
At the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ poll watchers need not be able to see ballots being counted in order to meet state guidelines for election integrity .
The Supreme Court ruled in a 5-2 decision in this case that a poll watcher merely needs to be in the room , this being a loss for Team Trump .
“ Pennsylvania is now the only state in the country … that doesn ’ t allow inspection of mail-in ballots , ” Giuliani indicated .
Dominion Voting Systems were designed in Venezuela for the specific purpose of committing election fraud Concerning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with claims that he or she observed serious problems with vote counts , particularly during the “ wee morning hours ” the day after the election .
“ The circumstances and events are eerily reminiscent of what happened with Smartmatic software electronically changing votes in the 2013 presidential election in Venezuela , ” this whistleblower noted , adding that all of the anomalies conveniently benefitted Biden at the expense of Trump .
Giuliani is fully aware of all this , explaining that Dominion systems were invented in Venezuela “ specifically to fix elections @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Carolyn Maloney , a Democrat senator from Manhattan , revealed all of what Giuliani is now saying back in 2006 and 2007 when she warned that the U.S. should not adopt Dominion systems because they were built for fraud .
“ We shouldn ’ t be using this company that was founded by Chávez to call votes in America because their specialty in Venezuela is cheating , ” Giuliani added , further noting that Dominion is “ a far-left radical company ” with high-level people within its ranks that are avowed supporters and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
We reported on one just the other day who goes by the name of Eric Coomer , this particular individual having written lengthy , vulgar diatribes on his social media pages blasting Trump and telling any friends who support Trump to defriend him .
“ All parties involved in the decision to have our votes go to another country deserve the maximum sentence in the worst prison that this country has , ” wrote one incensed commenter at The Gateway Pundit upon hearing the news .

What do Venezuela, a third-world socialist nation in economic ruin, and the United States have in common? Everything if we are talking about the fraudulent 2020 election.
by Ethan Huff
Believe it or not, the very same voting machines and technologies used to install dictators in Venezuela are now being used in the U.S. to rig elections for Democrats like Joe Biden, whom the mainstream media is already declaring to be the 46th president.
Speaking to Lou Dobbs during a recent interview, Rudy Giuliani, President Trump’s lawyer, revealed a number of bombshells about how the left is attempting to steal the 2020 election, including with the help of Dominion Voting Systems that run Smartmatic software.
In 27 or 28 states, Giuliani explained, votes were tabulated off-shore in Germany and Spain. And in almost every state where this process occurred, vote “irregularities” were observed that appear to have shifted the tallies in favor of Biden.
Giuliani and the Trump team are in the process of fully unraveling this fraud, but we know already that things are changing.
In Nevada, for instance, the five-member county board of elections in Clark County, which covers Las Vegas, decertified as the winner a Democrat, who was replaced with a Republican.
Confirmed irregularities in the form of improperly verified signatures led to the overturning of that race, and Giuliani says the same thing happened to Trump, the potential ramifications being that Trump could end up winning Nevada.
In Pennsylvania, some 8,000 illegal ballots were identified and Giuliani and his team are pushing to have those thrown out, pending a Supreme Court ruling.
At the same time, Pennsylvania has declared that poll watchers need not be able to see ballots being counted in order to meet state guidelines for election integrity.
The Supreme Court ruled in a 5-2 decision in this case that a poll watcher merely needs to be in the room, this being a loss for Team Trump.
“Pennsylvania is now the only state in the country … that doesn’t allow inspection of mail-in ballots,” Giuliani indicated.
Dominion Voting Systems were designed in Venezuela for the specific purpose of committing election fraud
Concerning Dominion, a whistleblower has come forward with claims that he or she observed serious problems with vote counts, particularly during the “wee morning hours” the day after the election.
“The circumstances and events are eerily reminiscent of what happened with Smartmatic software electronically changing votes in the 2013 presidential election in Venezuela,” this whistleblower noted, adding that all of the anomalies conveniently benefitted Biden at the expense of Trump.
Giuliani is fully aware of all this, explaining that Dominion systems were invented in Venezuela “specifically to fix elections – that’s their expertise.”
Carolyn Maloney, a Democrat senator from Manhattan, revealed all of what Giuliani is now saying back in 2006 and 2007 when she warned that the U.S. should not adopt Dominion systems because they were built for fraud.
“We shouldn’t be using this company that was founded by Chávez to call votes in America because their specialty in Venezuela is cheating,” Giuliani added, further noting that Dominion is “a far-left radical company” with high-level people within its ranks that are avowed supporters and members of the domestic terrorist group Antifa.
We reported on one just the other day who goes by the name of Eric Coomer, this particular individual having written lengthy, vulgar diatribes on his social media pages blasting Trump and telling any friends who support Trump to defriend him.
“All parties involved in the decision to have our votes go to another country deserve the maximum sentence in the worst prison that this country has,” wrote one incensed commenter at The Gateway Pundit upon hearing the news.


humansarefree--2020-11-23--Fauci Says You’re a Threat to Public Health if You Don’t Want the Very Rushed Covid-19 Vaccine

The biggest public health threat facing America today is not the Wuhan coronavirus ( Covid-19 ) , according to Anthony Fauci .
It is Americans who are planning to refuse Big Pharma ’ s fast-approaching experimental Covid-19 vaccines .
Speaking to The New York Times in a recent interview , Fauci whined about the fact that tens of millions of Americans are still not buying what he is trying to sell them , no matter how many times he attempts to peddle it .
There are actually people out there , much to Fauci ’ s surprise , who “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a problem ” – “ this ” being the plandemic .
The endless fearmongering is apparently not producing the desired outcome , though Fauci is apparently going to keep trying .
“ Despite a quarter million deaths , despite more than 11 million infections , despite 150,000 new infections a day , they don ’ t believe it ’ s real , ” Fauci pouted .
“ That is a real problem.
” Poor Fauci .
It must be really tough to come to the stark realization that you are totally and completely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is somebody , and the laughingstock of the nation .
Save for those with an extreme case of Stockholm syndrome , no rational , critically thinking person cares one iota about what Fauci has to say .
And yet he keeps on saying it as though his opinions matter .
Fauci is about as legitimate as those Nigerian princes who used to send us all emails asking for our bank routing numbers so they could deposit a secret African inheritance .
In other words , Fauci is nothing more than a scam artist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Fauci says get your Covid-19 jab or you ’ re not a real American As for the rapacious push to unleash Covid-19 vaccines at warp speed , Fauci claims that this is perfectly normal and in-line with the nature of messenger RNA ( mRNA ) technology , which he claims made it simple to produce the jabs in a matter of months .
For a little scientific background on mRNA technology , check out this article ( and this one as well ) .
The Big Pharma companies that have developed mRNA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ diligence , Fauci insists , and Americans should not even think twice about taking the jabs .
“ By the time you get the FDA deeming that this is a safe and efficacious vaccine , you ’ ve had an independent and transparent process decide , ” Fauci added during his screed .
“ We ’ ve got to keep hammering that home because for the group of people who are concerned about the process , the process is sound.
” It is certainly our intention to keep “ hammering ” home the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that they do not work and are not safe , period .
There is no legitimate scientific evidence to back them , and only empty promises coming from vaccine companies that are focused solely on profits .
Anyone who believes otherwise has his head deeply buried in the sands of cognitive dissonance because the truth is out there for those who are interested in it .
Those who are not will be the ones lining right up to get the Trump-Fauci jabs once they are ready to be “ powerfully distributed ” by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The solely theoretical concept / computer model of ‘ herd immunity ’ was invented by those folks to find the justification for vaccinating people not at risk of a pathogen or disease , ” wrote one Zero Hedge commenter , noting that the very bedrock of the Religion of Vaccines is fatally flawed .
“ If you don ’ t get the jab then you are a grandma-murdering , asymptomatic super-spreader , ” wrote another , speculating about the type of propaganda we can all expect once the jabs are released .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @

During an interview with CBS’ “The Takeout” podcast recorded on Wednesday and released on Thursday, White House Chief Medical Adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci defended the NIH funding research at the Wuhan Institute Virology and said that “the only regret is that what it has caused right now is such a degree of distraction” from combating the pandemic.
Go back and watch any of the Nuremberg Trials that took place after WWII, and listen to the testimony of the captured Nazis on the stand for their myriad war crimes, and you will see an astounding thing.
None of them sorry, none of them repentant, all of the angry they even had to be brought to account for their crimes. So it is with Anthony Fauci, disciple of Baphomet, bragging about how “successful” his funding of the Wuhan lab that created the COVID-19 gain-of-function virus has been. Fauci would have made a great Nazi.
“And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.” Daniel 7:25 (KJB)
Anthony Fauci has the next variant already queued up and ready for distribution, and the only thing that will save you? Booster shots! Lots and lots and endless lots of booster shots, mental grooming for the day your next injection will be the Mark of the Beast from the government of Antichrist. Anthony Fauci will absolutely miss the Rapture, but he sure-as-shooting won’t miss the Lake of Fire.
Anthony Fauci Defends NIH Funding Wuhan Lab: ‘Only Regret’ Is That It’s Caused ‘Such a Degree of Distraction’
From Breitbart News: Host Major Garrett asked, [relevant exchange begins around 7:35] “There were two grants from the National Institutes of Health into investigatory work in the field in the Wuhan Institute of Virology and another institution there. Have you run to ground what those did or didn’t do in terms of creating any atmosphere in which a leak could have occurred or might have occurred?”
Fauci responded:
“Well, the grants that [were] funded were to do surveillance in the environment to ask and answer questions that I just mentioned, when you go out, do you see any viruses out there that could potentially evolve to infect humans and do you do surveillance among people in those areas in China to see if there’s any inkling that, under the radar screen, such viruses may have been circulating.
“In fact, one of the papers that came out from studies from that grant was extremely important in putting a definitive stamp of understanding of how the original SARS-CoV-1 was able to evolve. So, those were questions that got a high priority in peer review to do the research to try and understand that.”
Garrett then asked, “And to those who think there might be some type of scandal or something incorrect or ill-advised about those grants, what would you say, Dr. Fauci?”
Fauci answered:
“Well, what you do, Major, is you take a look at the viruses that [were] worked on under the auspices of that grant and what the grant was directed for. And you look at the publications that came from the research associated with that grant.
“The viruses that were worked with in that environment, in that particular context of that grant could not possibly molecularly evolved into what we know now as SARS-CoV-2. Because when you look at how you can go from one virus and do something with it to get to be another, the viruses that the grant allowed the investigators, competent investigators to work with, molecularly, were so different than what ultimately came out to be SARS-CoV-2 that anyone that looks at those two viruses who knows anything about evolutionary virology will tell you that they’re so far apart that you couldn’t possibly have had it emerge into that particular virus.”
Garrett then asked, “Real quickly, no regrets about those grants?”
Fauci responded:
“Well, the only regret is that what it has caused right now is such a degree of distraction from trying to do what we really should be doing, is addressing the outbreak, and what we did, and did quite successfully, was to develop jjabs that have now been life-saving. That’s what the job of myself and my team and my institute is, and, thankfully, we did that very successfully.”
Sources: NowTheEndBegins.com; Breitbart.com


humansarefree--2020-11-23--Communist China Dictator Xi Jinping Calls for Global QR Code Human Tracking System

Chinese Communist President Xi Jinping wants travelers to adopt a global QR code system to help determine their health status and travel “ permissions ” in a post-coronavirus pandemic travel great reset .
The global elites behind the Great Reset have given us the entire year of 2020 to mentally prepare ourselves for the coming New World Order , and their puppet candidate at the center of it all , Joe Biden , is only too eager to get started in his brief stint as the 46th president of the United States .
We have been warning you about the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the country that gave us the Chinese Virus is called for exactly that .
Expect a cameo appearance from Bill Gates in 3,2,1… “ And he causeth all , both small and great , rich and poor , free and bond , to receive a mark in their right hand , or in their foreheads : And that no man might buy or sell , save he that had the mark , or the name of the beast , or the number of his name .
Here is wisdom .
Let him that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ beast : for it is the number of a man ; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.
” Revelation 13:16-18 ( KJB ) FROM BREITBART NEWS : During the virtual G20 summit on Saturday , Xi called for a coronavirus “ global mechanism ” which involves international recognition of health certificates in the form of QR codes to allow people to travel freely , according to state media .
The dictator says the system can be based on “ nucleic acid testing results in the form of internationally accepted QR @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Xinhua .
“ We need to further harmonize policies and standards and establish ‘ fast tracks ’ to facilitate the orderly flow of people , ” he is quoted saying .
“ We hope more countries would participate.
” QR codes are bar codes that can be read by mobile phones that are a common tool of tracking and control in Communist China .
Under the scheme China has employed since February , users are issued a traffic-light style health code , with a green code allowing someone to travel freely , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they need to quarantine for up to two weeks .

Chinese Communist President Xi Jinping wants travelers to adopt a global QR code system to help determine their health status and travel “permissions” in a post-coronavirus pandemic travel great reset.
The global elites behind the Great Reset have given us the entire year of 2020 to mentally prepare ourselves for the coming New World Order, and their puppet candidate at the center of it all, Joe Biden, is only too eager to get started in his brief stint as the 46th president of the United States.
We have been warning you about the coming digital Immunity Passport, and now the country that gave us the Chinese Virus is called for exactly that. Expect a cameo appearance from Billy Boy in 3,2,1…
“And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.” Revelation 13:16-18 (KJB)
China Wants Passenger Tracking System for Global Travel Coronavirus Reset
FROM BREITBART NEWS: During the virtual G20 summit on Saturday, Xi called for a coronavirus “global mechanism” which involves international recognition of health certificates in the form of QR codes to allow people to travel freely, according to state media.
The dictator says the system can be based on “nucleic acid testing results in the form of internationally accepted QR codes,” reported state news agency Xinhua.
“We need to further harmonize policies and standards and establish ‘fast tracks’ to facilitate the orderly flow of people,” he is quoted saying. “We hope more countries would participate.”
QR codes are bar codes that can be read by mobile phones that are a common tool of tracking and control in Communist China.
Under the scheme China has employed since February, users are issued a traffic-light style health code, with a green code allowing someone to travel freely, and an orange or red code indicating that they need to quarantine for up to two weeks.
By Geoffrey Grider, Guest writer / Reference: Breitbart.com


humansarefree--2020-11-23--Former CNN Anchor Speaks Out on Media Censorship

Sharyl Attkisson is an award-winning investigative journalist with uncompromising integrity .
Her latest book , “ Slanted : How the News Media Taught Us to Love Censorship and Hate Journalism , ” is scheduled for release right around Thanksgiving , November 24 , 2020 .
In this , her third book , she addresses one of the most pressing issues of our time : media bias and the deterioration of objective journalism — a topic on which she has first-hand experience .
A former anchor at CNN and CBS News , Attkisson now produces her own Sunday television news program @ @ @ @ @ @ @ well as two podcasts : “ Full Measure After Hours ” and “ The Sharyl Attkisson Podcast , ” in which she covers the kinds of stories that mainstream news no longer touches .
Propaganda through media certainly isn ’ t a new thing .
Starting in the late 1940s,1 the CIA ran a well-documented but at the time covert campaign called “ Operation Mockingbird , ” in which they recruited journalists as assets to spread propaganda — news slanted in one way or another .
While the program is always referred to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is said to have been ended in the 1970s,2 evidence suggests it never really stopped .
“ There are all kinds of ways the Intel community has , and can , manipulate the news , ” Attkisson says , “ but we reached a new level in 2016 , 2017 , because they don ’ t even have to whisper in our ear to get us to report stuff .
We hired them .
Meaning , Brennan , Clapper , Comey — all of them were hired as consultants .
They were invited @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t have to put them through a filter and anonymous sources , although plenty of anonymous sources were also used .
But daily putting forth their propaganda , much of which , obviously , was proven false , particularly on the Trump , Russia narrative .
But every day , we allowed them to plaster the airwaves , even after they were proven admittedly wrong … After two years of spewing this false information , they ’ re still consulted by the media .
They ’ re still used .
So , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Intel operation if they wish to use the media towards whatever goal they may have … I firmly believe that there have been ongoing [ propaganda ] campaigns that continue today .
Maybe separate operations by intelligence agencies and officials to manipulate the news , and certainly have things reported a certain way to try to push for certain outcomes in politics here at home and internationally.
” Multinational industries , the drug industry in particular , also has a similar level of influence over content relating to their particular interests .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and as drug advertising became a major income stream for media companies , their reporting on health and medicine became increasingly biased .
The reason is simple .
They can not afford to “ bite the hand that feeds them.
” If an advertiser doesn ’ t want the public to know about a particular finding , all they have to do to influence the reporting is to threaten to withdraw its advertising , which will hurt the media company ’ s bottom line .
Drug companies have also become major sponsors @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are taught to prescribe drugs for all ills , but they ’ re not taught about the side effects and drawbacks of those drugs .
Today , the drug industry also controls fact-checking organizations such as NewsGuard , as it is funded by Publicis , which is supported by drug companies .
When feeding from the Big Pharma trough , how could they possibly be objective in their fact-checking ?
Reality shows us they can ’ t because they aren ’ t .
Big Tech companies , of course , are also masters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or their technocratic allies .
As just one of countless examples , you can no longer post a link to Mercola.com on Twitter .
First , they added a false warning that made it look like my site contained dangerous malware when readers would click on a posted link .
After a while , they simply blocked the ability to post links to our site altogether .
“ This started , and I traced this in my second book , ‘ The Smear , ’ to Media Matters … the left-wing propaganda group @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and is a big smear organization , ” Attkisson says .
“ They acknowledged going to Facebook about the time when they were worried that Donald Trump was going to get elected .
They really felt that the only thing giving him a leg up , and they still believe this today , is his social media outreach .
They tried to think of a way to control , with the kind of social media and news people could get , so Media Matters lobbied Facebook and tried to convince them — @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a fact-checking brand-new role that nobody had ever asked for .
We ’ re not begging for our information to be curated .
That was a pretend demand created by the propagandists who wanted to control the information .
They had to make us think that we needed a third party to step in and tell us what to think and sort through the information … The fake news effort , the fact-checking , which is usually fake fact-checking , meaning it ’ s not a genuine effort , is a propaganda effort @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as we come into the 2020 election , for much the same reason , whereby , the social media companies , third parties , academic institutions and NewsGuard … they insert themselves .
But of course , they ’ re all backed by certain money and special interests .
They ’ re no more in a position to fact-check than an ordinary person walking on the street … They have interests .
They make sure certain things are not seen , even if true .
And I think this is the most serious @ @ @ @ @ @ @ right now to our media environment .
I ’ m afraid that our kids will be telling their kids of a time when you used to be able to go on the internet and find most , any , information you wanted , because we are increasingly being pointed only to that which they , people who control the information , wish for us to see.
” In her book , Attkisson also spends an entire chapter dissecting the highly-biased treatment of President Trump , and how the media have , through their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ simply because they consider him “ uniquely dangerous.
” “ Therefore , you don ’ t have to follow the normal rules and guidelines when it comes to fair and accurate reporting , which I think is one of the most absurd things I ’ ve ever heard in my life , from someone in our profession , because the standards exist precisely so that we report on everybody the same way , ” she says .
“ In other words , using the same standards , whether we like them or not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ don ’ t like or agree with the candidate — that ’ s when the standards become most important .
But you need only look at Politico , for example , during the last election .
I interviewed them shortly afterwards .
Someone in charge of some of their coverage … in almost every answer to a question , she brought up President Trump and something negative about him .
One of the things she said was how many lies he tells per minute .
She said , ‘ We actually had a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ per minute that President Trump told.
’ And I asked the obvious question , ‘ Well , what was that compared to Hillary ’ s supposed lies per minute ?
’ And she actually said , ‘ Oh , we didn ’ t have the staffing to do Hillary too.
’ Can you imagine a national news organization that purports to cover something fairly and we ’ ll fact-check the lies per minute of one candidate and not the opposing candidate and pretend that that qualifies as fair news ?
I also interviewed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ same thing : That they look at things from a fair-minded viewpoint and are no fan of President Trump , yet are appalled at how the media has dishonestly treated certain topics and information , which should make everybody wonder , ‘ Are we getting the truth when it comes to things that don ’ t have to do with President Trump ?
If the media can report so many things out of context and incorrectly when it comes to somebody they don ’ t like , what else are we getting that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s not fully true ?
’ ” Prior to President Trump , virtually no one in the media would accuse someone of lying .
The standard was to question an individual ’ s statement or point out a discrepancy to another source , but not call it an outright lie , because it ’ s easy to get confused on specifics .
A lie is a very specific allegation that implies an intent to deceive .
Just because you misremember a fact doesn ’ t mean you lied .
“ [ In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fact that … I know I ’ ve probably been lied to many times , but I don ’ t believe I ’ ve ever reported that somebody lied to me in a hard news report .
“ Why ?
Well , a lie is a specific thing that requires you to know the mind of the person .
And you as a journalist have to withhold , even if you think something is true without the evidence , you really can ’ t say it ’ s true .
I ’ ll @ @ @ @ @ @ @ book : Ford and Firestone tires .
The executives consistently said there was no evidence that these tires were dangerous prior to the scandal around the 2000 time period where there were a lot of deaths .
I had documents from a source that showed this very danger many years before .
It appeared that they were lying , but I didn ’ t call it a lie because there are many other explanations someone could give .
They could say , ‘ Well , these guys weren ’ t there at the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t know that these discussions had been had .
They didn ’ t have access to the emails , their subordinates didn ’ t tell them.
’ So , you don ’ t know whether they ’ re mistaken or lying .
And from a journalistic standpoint , we used to always take the objective road and say something like , ‘ Their testimony contradicts the documentary record.
’ That ’ s good enough .
People at home can make up their own mind .
But there was a turn taken , specifically @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the media started frequently calling things that he said , lies — even when there was simply something that was a matter of opinion , or could not be proven , or a mistake , none of which are lies .
The New York Times was proud of this when it did it .
And I recount in the book the first time they made a headline where they talked about President Trump lying , and how that was cheered on by others in the media who then followed suit .
They @ @ @ @ @ @ @ professor who wrote a big op-ed about how it was time to stop doing this objective reporting and that we needed to call out President Trump ’ s lies frequently and often .
It ’ s just , again , from a journalistic standpoint , ridiculous … I think this is a new and dangerous tactic that has really destroyed our objectivity in the eyes of the public .
And rightly so.
” In terms of health , COVID-19 reporting has taken censorship and media manipulation to brand new heights , eclipsing just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t even hide the bias anymore .
All social media platforms are openly censoring dissenting views about the virus , particularly its origin and treatment .
Even well-respected doctors and scientists have been axed for speaking against the desired narrative dictated by the World Health Organization .
August 26 , 2020 , the CDC had released data3 showing 94 % of people who had died during the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S. died “ with ” the virus , not “ from ” it .
Only 6 % had COVID-19 listed as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ death certificate .
Hence , the real death toll , those who unarguably died as a direct result of the infection , is only around 10,000 .
“ For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19 , on average , there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death , ” the CDC stated .
This is an important distinction .
“ Yet mainstream media continues to report that nearly 200,000 have died “ from ” COVID-19 in the U.S , thereby increasing national fear so they can implement their lockdowns @ @ @ @ @ @ @ freedoms and liberty .
“ I think we need both numbers , in a separate sense , to have perspective and understanding of what ’ s really happening , ” Attkisson says .
“ And it ’ s something that very few people have shown interest in … Early on , it was clear … that the primary victims were those with the comorbidities and the elderly population in nursing homes and so on .
But then we sort of lost track of that .
And then there seemed to be a propaganda @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , after understanding young people were at very little risk of serious illness and death , there seemed to be an effort to convince people that the youth must be very careful .
That more young people are dying and getting sick .
I can only guess as to why that ’ s important to some interests , but I suspect it has something to do with the fact that when the vaccine comes out , the market needs to be aimed .
You can ’ t rule out young people , you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , or else you ’ ve ruled out a huge section of the vaccine market .
And they certainly don ’ t want to make a vaccine that ’ s not used by a giant percentage of the population .
I think they have to create a market .
Why do I think this ?
Well , I was actually told by a top immunization official for the government , when they learned flu shots are ineffective in the elderly … that the way around that was not to take flu shots away @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that was dishonest because we ’ ve been telling it was necessary for so many years — but to convince parents to get their children and babies flu shots so that they wouldn ’ t ‘ carry flu to the elderly.
’ I remember him saying to me , ‘ The trick is going to be to convince parents to give a vaccine to their children who don ’ t really need it themselves.
’ In other words , for a secondary supposed benefit for the elderly .
And darn it , if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ next season , they recommended flu shots for babies and children .
And they didn ’ t tell anybody at the time that they were doing it because flu shots don ’ t work in the elderly .
They just started telling people that your kids need flu shots.
” When a ‘ Case ’ Is Not a Case The media are also grossly misusing the term “ case , ” in reference to the COVID-19 case load .
A case is a medical term for a patient with a symptomatic type of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who tests positive for antibodies or pieces of viral DNA .
By referring to all positive tests as “ cases , ” they ’ re able to fan the flames of panic , making the situation sound far worse than it actually is .
Many still do not understand that most of those who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 are asymptomatic .
They think these are sick people in the hospital and that rising “ case ” numbers mean there will be a rise in deaths .
Statistics reveal this simply isn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not a linear correlation between positive tests and deaths .
“ There are just so many things that are misreported , ” Attkisson says .
“ But if you try to report them accurately and factually , you get called out by those in the media who either didn ’ t understand , or are simply so blinded by the propaganda narrative .
The New York Times did this .
They actually called me and several other people out as ‘ coronavirus doubters , ’ although I had never said or written anything @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the risk of it .
But they were working very hard to silence voices who are simply reporting more accurately and with context on what ’ s really happening .
By the way , when I spoke to some scientists … and I said , ‘ Why don ’ t you speak out or correct what you think is the misconception ?
’ Separately , several of them told me they feared speaking out publicly because they were afraid they would be labeled a coronavirus doubter , and for fear of contradicting Dr. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ We ’ re at a pretty scary time when scientists who are experts on these issues fear speaking what they believe is the scientific truth because they ’ ll be controversialized.
’ ” The clear take-home message I got from reading , “ Slanted : How the News Media Taught Us to Love Censorship and Hate Journalism , ” is that there ’ s a profoundly serious problem with most mainstream conventional media .
The obvious question is : Where can you go to get the truth ?
We would like to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the truth .
We don ’ t have time to waste to be brainwashed by propaganda .
At the end of her book , Attkisson lists a variety of sources she ’ s come to trust .
It may be worth getting the book for those recommendations alone .
“ I ’ m sure I left many people out , but I tried to point to a few outlets and people , and I consulted some of my colleagues for their recommendations .
“ It ’ s not an easy answer .
There @ @ @ @ @ @ @ go .
I can ’ t say , ‘ Watch this news every day or read this publication.
’ It ’ s more granular than that .
You have to find a reporter that you trust on a topic and then chase that reporter around … That ’ s where I think you can find a segment of truth .
And it ’ s not always , sadly , going to be objective truth .
Some of the reporters I name are coming from the left viewpoint or coming from a right viewpoint @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be brave reporters of a particular topic or controversy that I think you can rely on .
But it ’ s just not so simple as it used to be where you could just point to a person or an outlet and say , ‘ Watch that , and you ’ ll get your fair shake at the news ’ … I would say , in closing , that I do think a new paradigm will develop when it comes to news reporting .
There are people looking at how news and information @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it can not be censored by big tech giants , political figures and nonprofits and so on … I ’ m told there ’ s a way to develop a social media platform where you can post freely and also not be subject to censorship .
I think things will evolve because people are tired of what they ’ re seeing .
And I hope something really positive , being an optimist , develops out of all of this down the road.
” By Dr. Joseph Mercola , author of Fat for Fuel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Boost Brain Power , and Increase Your Energy

Sharyl Attkisson is an award-winning investigative journalist with uncompromising integrity. Her latest book, “Slanted: How the News Media Taught Us to Love Censorship and Hate Journalism,” is scheduled for release right around Thanksgiving, November 24, 2020.
In this, her third book, she addresses one of the most pressing issues of our time: media bias and the deterioration of objective journalism — a topic on which she has first-hand experience.
A former anchor at CNN and CBS News, Attkisson now produces her own Sunday television news program, “Full Measure,” as well as two podcasts: “Full Measure After Hours” and “The Sharyl Attkisson Podcast,” in which she covers the kinds of stories that mainstream news no longer touches.
Slanted Media
Propaganda through media certainly isn’t a new thing. Starting in the late 1940s,1 the CIA ran a well-documented but at the time covert campaign called “Operation Mockingbird,” in which they recruited journalists as assets to spread propaganda — news slanted in one way or another.
While the program is always referred to in the past tense, as it is said to have been ended in the 1970s,2 evidence suggests it never really stopped.
“There are all kinds of ways the Intel community has, and can, manipulate the news,” Attkisson says, “but we reached a new level in 2016, 2017, because they don’t even have to whisper in our ear to get us to report stuff. We hired them.
Meaning, Brennan, Clapper, Comey — all of them were hired as consultants. They were invited on the news directly.
You didn’t have to put them through a filter and anonymous sources, although plenty of anonymous sources were also used. But daily putting forth their propaganda, much of which, obviously, was proven false, particularly on the Trump, Russia narrative.
But every day, we allowed them to plaster the airwaves, even after they were proven admittedly wrong … After two years of spewing this false information, they’re still consulted by the media.
They’re still used. So, it’s so easy for an Intel operation if they wish to use the media towards whatever goal they may have …
I firmly believe that there have been ongoing [propaganda] campaigns that continue today.
Maybe separate operations by intelligence agencies and officials to manipulate the news, and certainly have things reported a certain way to try to push for certain outcomes in politics here at home and internationally.”
Big Industry Also Influences the News
Multinational industries, the drug industry in particular, also has a similar level of influence over content relating to their particular interests.
In 1996, direct-to-consumer drug advertising was legalized, and as drug advertising became a major income stream for media companies, their reporting on health and medicine became increasingly biased.
The reason is simple. They cannot afford to “bite the hand that feeds them.”
If an advertiser doesn’t want the public to know about a particular finding, all they have to do to influence the reporting is to threaten to withdraw its advertising, which will hurt the media company’s bottom line.
Drug companies have also become major sponsors of medical education; thus, doctors are taught to prescribe drugs for all ills, but they’re not taught about the side effects and drawbacks of those drugs.
Today, the drug industry also controls fact-checking organizations such as NewsGuard, as it is funded by Publicis, which is supported by drug companies.
When feeding from the Big Pharma trough, how could they possibly be objective in their fact-checking? Reality shows us they can’t because they aren’t.
Big Tech — Master Manipulators of Minds
Big Tech companies, of course, are also masters of censoring anything that might hurt themselves or their technocratic allies. As just one of countless examples, you can no longer post a link to Mercola.com on Twitter.
First, they added a false warning that made it look like my site contained dangerous malware when readers would click on a posted link. After a while, they simply blocked the ability to post links to our site altogether.
“This started, and I traced this in my second book, ‘The Smear,’ to Media Matters … the left-wing propaganda group that supported Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and is a big smear organization,” Attkisson says.
“They acknowledged going to Facebook about the time when they were worried that Donald Trump was going to get elected.
They really felt that the only thing giving him a leg up, and they still believe this today, is his social media outreach.
They tried to think of a way to control, with the kind of social media and news people could get, so Media Matters lobbied Facebook and tried to convince them — and did so successfully — to taking a fact-checking brand-new role that nobody had ever asked for.
We’re not begging for our information to be curated. That was a pretend demand created by the propagandists who wanted to control the information.
They had to make us think that we needed a third party to step in and tell us what to think and sort through the information …
The fake news effort, the fact-checking, which is usually fake fact-checking, meaning it’s not a genuine effort, is a propaganda effort …
We’ve seen it explode as we come into the 2020 election, for much the same reason, whereby, the social media companies, third parties, academic institutions and NewsGuard … they insert themselves.
But of course, they’re all backed by certain money and special interests. They’re no more in a position to fact-check than an ordinary person walking on the street …
They have interests. They make sure certain things are not seen, even if true. And I think this is the most serious threat that I’m looking at right now to our media environment.
I’m afraid that our kids will be telling their kids of a time when you used to be able to go on the internet and find most, any, information you wanted, because we are increasingly being pointed only to that which they, people who control the information, wish for us to see.”
Presidential Treatment Takes on a New Meaning
In her book, Attkisson also spends an entire chapter dissecting the highly-biased treatment of President Trump, and how the media have, through their own admission, suspended traditional journalistic ethics simply because they consider him “uniquely dangerous.”
“Therefore, you don’t have to follow the normal rules and guidelines when it comes to fair and accurate reporting, which I think is one of the most absurd things I’ve ever heard in my life, from someone in our profession, because the standards exist precisely so that we report on everybody the same way,” she says.
“In other words, using the same standards, whether we like them or not. Particularly, perhaps, if we don’t like or agree with the candidate — that’s when the standards become most important. But you need only look at Politico, for example, during the last election.
I interviewed them shortly afterwards. Someone in charge of some of their coverage … in almost every answer to a question, she brought up President Trump and something negative about him.
One of the things she said was how many lies he tells per minute.
She said, ‘We actually had a team that calculated the number of lies per minute that President Trump told.’
And I asked the obvious question, ‘Well, what was that compared to Hillary’s supposed lies per minute?’ And she actually said, ‘Oh, we didn’t have the staffing to do Hillary too.’
Can you imagine a national news organization that purports to cover something fairly and we’ll fact-check the lies per minute of one candidate and not the opposing candidate and pretend that that qualifies as fair news?
I also interviewed some noted liberals who have noticed the same thing: That they look at things from a fair-minded viewpoint and are no fan of President Trump, yet are appalled at how the media has dishonestly treated certain topics and information, which should make everybody wonder, ‘Are we getting the truth when it comes to things that don’t have to do with President Trump?
If the media can report so many things out of context and incorrectly when it comes to somebody they don’t like, what else are we getting that’s not in context or that’s not fully true?’”
The Invention of Lying
Prior to President Trump, virtually no one in the media would accuse someone of lying. The standard was to question an individual’s statement or point out a discrepancy to another source, but not call it an outright lie, because it’s easy to get confused on specifics.
A lie is a very specific allegation that implies an intent to deceive. Just because you misremember a fact doesn’t mean you lied.
“[In the book] I talk about the fact that … I know I’ve probably been lied to many times, but I don’t believe I’ve ever reported that somebody lied to me in a hard news report.
“Why? Well, a lie is a specific thing that requires you to know the mind of the person. And you as a journalist have to withhold, even if you think something is true without the evidence, you really can’t say it’s true.
I’ll use the example I used in the book: Ford and Firestone tires. The executives consistently said there was no evidence that these tires were dangerous prior to the scandal around the 2000 time period where there were a lot of deaths. I had documents from a source that showed this very danger many years before.
It appeared that they were lying, but I didn’t call it a lie because there are many other explanations someone could give. They could say, ‘Well, these guys weren’t there at the time.
So, they didn’t know that these discussions had been had. They didn’t have access to the emails, their subordinates didn’t tell them.’ So, you don’t know whether they’re mistaken or lying.
And from a journalistic standpoint, we used to always take the objective road and say something like, ‘Their testimony contradicts the documentary record.’ That’s good enough. People at home can make up their own mind.
But there was a turn taken, specifically, to target President Trump, whereby, the media started frequently calling things that he said, lies — even when there was simply something that was a matter of opinion, or could not be proven, or a mistake, none of which are lies.
The New York Times was proud of this when it did it. And I recount in the book the first time they made a headline where they talked about President Trump lying, and how that was cheered on by others in the media who then followed suit.
They were even cheered on by a journalism professor who wrote a big op-ed about how it was time to stop doing this objective reporting and that we needed to call out President Trump’s lies frequently and often.
It’s just, again, from a journalistic standpoint, ridiculous … I think this is a new and dangerous tactic that has really destroyed our objectivity in the eyes of the public. And rightly so.”
Massaging COVID-19 Messages
In terms of health, COVID-19 reporting has taken censorship and media manipulation to brand new heights, eclipsing just about all previous efforts. They don’t even hide the bias anymore.
All social media platforms are openly censoring dissenting views about the virus, particularly its origin and treatment.
Even well-respected doctors and scientists have been axed for speaking against the desired narrative dictated by the World Health Organization.
August 26, 2020, the CDC had released data3 showing 94% of people who had died during the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S. died “with” the virus, not “from” it.
Only 6% had COVID-19 listed as the sole cause of death on the death certificate.
Hence, the real death toll, those who unarguably died as a direct result of the infection, is only around 10,000.
“For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death,” the CDC stated. This is an important distinction.
“Yet mainstream media continues to report that nearly 200,000 have died “from” COVID-19 in the U.S, thereby increasing national fear so they can implement their lockdowns and other strategies to limit our personal freedoms and liberty.
“I think we need both numbers, in a separate sense, to have perspective and understanding of what’s really happening,” Attkisson says.
“And it’s something that very few people have shown interest in … Early on, it was clear … that the primary victims were those with the comorbidities and the elderly population in nursing homes and so on.
But then we sort of lost track of that. And then there seemed to be a propaganda effort to convince people that, initially, after understanding young people were at very little risk of serious illness and death, there seemed to be an effort to convince people that the youth must be very careful.
That more young people are dying and getting sick.
I can only guess as to why that’s important to some interests, but I suspect it has something to do with the fact that when the jjab comes out, the market needs to be aimed.
You can’t rule out young people, you must make them believe they need it, or else you’ve ruled out a huge section of the jjab market.
And they certainly don’t want to make a jjab that’s not used by a giant percentage of the population. I think they have to create a market. Why do I think this?
Well, I was actually told by a top immunization official for the government, when they learned flu shots are ineffective in the elderly … that the way around that was not to take flu shots away from the elderly — who would think that was dishonest because we’ve been telling it was necessary for so many years — but to convince parents to get their children and babies flu shots so that they wouldn’t ‘carry flu to the elderly.’
I remember him saying to me, ‘The trick is going to be to convince parents to give a jjab to their children who don’t really need it themselves.’
In other words, for a secondary supposed benefit for the elderly. And darn it, if you didn’t see in the next season, they recommended flu shots for babies and children.
And they didn’t tell anybody at the time that they were doing it because flu shots don’t work in the elderly. They just started telling people that your kids need flu shots.”
When a ‘Case’ Is Not a Case
The media are also grossly misusing the term “case,” in reference to the COVID-19 case load. A case is a medical term for a patient with a symptomatic type of infection.
It’s not someone who tests positive for antibodies or pieces of viral DNA. By referring to all positive tests as “cases,” they’re able to fan the flames of panic, making the situation sound far worse than it actually is.
Many still do not understand that most of those who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 are asymptomatic. They think these are sick people in the hospital and that rising “case” numbers mean there will be a rise in deaths.
Statistics reveal this simply isn’t true, and that there’s not a linear correlation between positive tests and deaths.
“There are just so many things that are misreported,” Attkisson says.
“But if you try to report them accurately and factually, you get called out by those in the media who either didn’t understand, or are simply so blinded by the propaganda narrative.
The New York Times did this. They actually called me and several other people out as ‘coronavirus doubters,’ although I had never said or written anything that even remotely denies coronavirus or denies the risk of it.
But they were working very hard to silence voices who are simply reporting more accurately and with context on what’s really happening.
By the way, when I spoke to some scientists … and I said, ‘Why don’t you speak out or correct what you think is the misconception?’
Separately, several of them told me they feared speaking out publicly because they were afraid they would be labeled a coronavirus doubter, and for fear of contradicting Dr. Fauci.
So, I said, ‘We’re at a pretty scary time when scientists who are experts on these issues fear speaking what they believe is the scientific truth because they’ll be controversialized.’”
Search for Truth and Unbiased Facts
The clear take-home message I got from reading, “Slanted: How the News Media Taught Us to Love Censorship and Hate Journalism,” is that there’s a profoundly serious problem with most mainstream conventional media.
The obvious question is: Where can you go to get the truth? We would like to be informed, but we also want the truth. We don’t have time to waste to be brainwashed by propaganda.
At the end of her book, Attkisson lists a variety of sources she’s come to trust. It may be worth getting the book for those recommendations alone.
“I didn’t make a comprehensive list,” Attkisson says.
“I’m sure I left many people out, but I tried to point to a few outlets and people, and I consulted some of my colleagues for their recommendations.
“It’s not an easy answer. There isn’t a place you can go. I can’t say, ‘Watch this news every day or read this publication.’ It’s more granular than that.
You have to find a reporter that you trust on a topic and then chase that reporter around … That’s where I think you can find a segment of truth. And it’s not always, sadly, going to be objective truth.
Some of the reporters I name are coming from the left viewpoint or coming from a right viewpoint, but they have proven themselves to be brave reporters of a particular topic or controversy that I think you can rely on.
But it’s just not so simple as it used to be where you could just point to a person or an outlet and say, ‘Watch that, and you’ll get your fair shake at the news’ …
I would say, in closing, that I do think a new paradigm will develop when it comes to news reporting.
There are people looking at how news and information can be reported in a way that it cannot be censored by big tech giants, political figures and nonprofits and so on …
I’m told there’s a way to develop a social media platform where you can post freely and also not be subject to censorship.
I think things will evolve because people are tired of what they’re seeing. And I hope something really positive, being an optimist, develops out of all of this down the road.”
By Dr. Joseph Mercola, author of Fat for Fuel: A Revolutionary Diet to Combat Cancer, Boost Brain Power, and Increase Your Energy
Sources and References:


humansarefree--2020-11-23--UK Supreme Court Judge Slams ‘Totalitarian’ COVID ‘Control Freaks’ in Government

A British Supreme Court judge has slammed the UK government as ‘ control freaks ’ for attempting to control people ’ s lives under the guise of COVID , and labeled it “ morally and constitutionally indefensible ” to define what freedoms the public should and shouldn ’ t have .
In an op-ed published Sunday , Lord Sumption noted that the “ debate about whether to let us have a family Christmas perfectly sums up what is wrong with this Government ’ s handling ” of the crisis .
Sumption wrote that there are “ many different answers to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , yet the crux of the matter is “ whether we should be allowed to make the choice for ourselves , instead of having it imposed on us by law.
” “ But for the Jacobins of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies ( SAGE ) and the control freaks in the Department of Health , theirs is the only answer , ” Sumption urged .
The British government has posited allowing people to spend 5 days in the company of their relatives over Christmas , but with the caveat that in January @ @ @ @ @ @ @ privilege with more lockdown time , specifically another 25 days .
Lord Sumption , who served as a senior judge on the Supreme Court of the UK between between 2012 and 2018 , slammed the Prime Minister Boris Johnson , suggesting he is engaging in “ public relations management ” rather than leadership .
“ Boris Johnson knows that restrictions over Christmas would be deeply unpopular , widely ignored and catastrophic for the retail and hospitality industries , ” Sumption asserted .
“ So he will soon announce their temporary suspension , behaving @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state and Christmas was an act of indulgence on his part , ” the judge added .
Sumption further wrote that “ control freaks and the rest of the sackcloth and ashes brigade will demand a payback ” afterwards , claiming that some “ are already pressing for two , three or even five days of extra lockdown for every day of release over Christmas .
” Sumption proclaimed that the state is exercising an “ insistence on coercing the entire population , ” saying it is “ morally and constitutionally indefensible in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ totalitarian state , like China.
” “ The Government has not earned our trust .
Sooner or later , people will take back control of their own lives and do the right thing , whatever Ministers say , ” he predicted .
Sumption ’ s comments come in the wake of reports that the UK government is planning to issue ‘ freedom passes ’ for people who agree to vaccination or twice testing negative for the virus in one week .

A British Supreme Court judge has slammed the UK government as ‘control freaks’ for attempting to control people’s lives under the guise of COVID, and labeled it “morally and constitutionally indefensible” to define what freedoms the public should and shouldn’t have.
by Steve Watson
In an op-ed published Sunday, Lord Sumption noted that the “debate about whether to let us have a family Christmas perfectly sums up what is wrong with this Government’s handling” of the crisis.
Sumption wrote that there are “many different answers to the dilemmas of a Covid Christmas”, yet the crux of the matter is “whether we should be allowed to make the choice for ourselves, instead of having it imposed on us by law.”
“But for the Jacobins of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) and the control freaks in the Department of Health, theirs is the only answer,” Sumption urged.
The British government has posited allowing people to spend 5 days in the company of their relatives over Christmas, but with the caveat that in January they will have to pay back the privilege with more lockdown time, specifically another 25 days.
The technocrats may allow us to escape lockdown for a few days over Christmas. How gracious of them! pic.twitter.com/g0tSKjohOV — Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) November 22, 2020
Lord Sumption, who served as a senior judge on the Supreme Court of the UK between between 2012 and 2018, slammed the Prime Minister Boris Johnson, suggesting he is engaging in “public relations management” rather than leadership.
“Boris Johnson knows that restrictions over Christmas would be deeply unpopular, widely ignored and catastrophic for the retail and hospitality industries,” Sumption asserted.
“So he will soon announce their temporary suspension, behaving as if our lives belonged to the state and Christmas was an act of indulgence on his part,” the judge added.
I love to see the local pubs fighting back against lockdown lunacy. Bravo. pic.twitter.com/ZI1GJ23Cwp — Benjamin Loughnane (@Loknayn) November 21, 2020
Sumption further wrote that “control freaks and the rest of the sackcloth and ashes brigade will demand a payback” afterwards, claiming that some “are already pressing for two, three or even five days of extra lockdown for every day of release over Christmas. ”
Sumption proclaimed that the state is exercising an “insistence on coercing the entire population,” saying it is “morally and constitutionally indefensible in a country which is not yet a totalitarian state, like China.”
“The Government has not earned our trust. Sooner or later, people will take back control of their own lives and do the right thing, whatever Ministers say,” he predicted.
Oi, mate – have you got a license for that "freedom"? https://t.co/FN1FV7Efst — Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) November 22, 2020
Sumption’s comments come in the wake of reports that the UK government is planning to issue ‘freedom passes’ for people who agree to vaccination or twice testing negative for the virus in one week.


humansarefree--2020-11-23--Geoengineering Watch: Our First Ever High Altitude Atmospheric Testing

After substantial difficulty and expense , Geoengineering Watch has utilized two types of aircraft to complete multiple atmospheric particulate sampling flights up to and exceeding 40,000 feet .
One of the aircraft we conducted our testing missions in is also used by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ( NOAA ) for their atmospheric testing operations .
The Geoengineering Watch team carried out multiple sample gathering flights in the high altitude haze layer being emitted by large jet carriers .
The lingering , spreading and sun blocking jet aircraft trails are not just condensation as we have been told by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sunlight by aircraft dispersed particles , a form of global warming mitigation known as “ Solar Radiation Management ” , is ongoing .
These global climate engineering operations are causing unquantifiable damage to the planet ’ s life support systems and human health .
This twelve minute video is an insight segment from the under production ground breaking climate engineering exposé documentary titled “ The Dimming ” .
All are needed in the critical battle to wake populations to what is coming , we must make every day count .
Share credible data @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voice heard .

After substantial difficulty and expense, Geoengineering Watch has utilized two types of aircraft to complete multiple atmospheric particulate sampling flights up to and exceeding 40,000 feet.
One of the aircraft we conducted our testing missions in is also used by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for their atmospheric testing operations.
The Geoengineering Watch team carried out multiple sample gathering flights in the high altitude haze layer being emitted by large jet carriers.
The lingering, spreading and sun blocking jet aircraft trails are not just condensation as we have been told by government sources.
The dimming of direct sunlight by aircraft dispersed particles, a form of global warming mitigation known as “Solar Radiation Management”, is ongoing.
These global climate engineering operations are causing unquantifiable damage to the planet’s life support systems and human health.
This twelve minute video is an insight segment from the under production ground breaking climate engineering exposé documentary titled “The Dimming”.
All are needed in the critical battle to wake populations to what is coming, we must make every day count. Share credible data from a credible source, make your voice heard.
Also read: NASA Satellite Imagery Reveals Shocking Proof Of Climate Engineering
Source: Dane Wigington’s YouTube.com