humansarefree--2020-07-29--The UN Sides With ANTIFA and Intervenes in US Domestic Affairs (Just As We Warned for the Past Coupl

The UN Sides With ANTIFA and Intervenes in US Domestic Affairs (Just As We Warned for the Past Couple of Years)

The United Nations ( UN ) has decided to side with Antifa and intervene in U.S. domestic affairs , condemning President Donald Trump for defending American cities against left-wing terrorism .
Liz Throssell , a UN human rights spokeswoman warned that unidentified federal agents are illegally detaining peaceful protestors , which may give rise to “ arbitrary detention and other human rights violations.
” “ The authorities should ensure that federal and local security forces deployed are properly and clearly identified and would use force only when necessary , proportionately and in accordance with international standards , ” she said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mass violence toward law enforcement , initiated by left-wing terror groups .
The UN did not denounce the human rights abuses that Antifa and Black Lives Matter militants have inflicted throughout America , which has become a stealth form of genocide toward whites .
Instead , the UN is right on time to defend the left-wing terror , to aid and abed the destruction of the United States from within , and to tear down the rule of law in America .
Not the first time either : United Nations Sides With Antifa @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Defund The UN ) It ’ s now apparent that foreign militaries and intelligence operations are behind the upheaval occurring in American cities , and these bad actors and governing bodies will clearly take advantage of the upheaval to take control and impose their will over the United States .
As federal agents try to save their country from violent left-wing mobs , will the UN send troops into the US to take out the federal agents , to occupy America , and to let terror reign ?
No one wants to see @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Border and Custom patrols going to war in American cities , but the democrat governors and mayors have left the federal government with no choice but to intervene in strategic and powerful ways that restore law and order .
Federal agents have adapted new strategies to avoid doxxing and to avoid large confrontations in the city streets , protecting innocent lives as agents single out , detain , and prosecute violent criminals hiding within the mob .
The inner cities are burning and law enforcement is being overrun by racially-charged , left-wing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wheeler has stood with the arsonists , looters , violent criminals and domestic terrorists , watching his city go up in flames .
Standing with the terrorists , Wheeler has called Trump ’ s federal help “ an explicit abuse of power ” that puts “ federal officers and Oregonians in danger.
” He publicly stated that federal law enforcement should “ leave our city.
” These weak democrat leaders have become the problem , openly permitting thugs to attack law enforcement , burn down businesses and threaten people ’ s lives .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ openly encouraged by mayors like Ted Wheeler .
The streets of Portland look like a war zone , as state and federal property comes under threat .
Defund The U.N. : United Nations Just Shared The Flag Of Antifa UN turns blind eye toward widespread human rights abuses initiated by Antifa and Black Lives Matter Three federal officers who were defending the Hatfield Federal Courthouse were attacked by antifa rioters .
Department of Homeland Security official Richard Cline confirmed that the officers were attacked by lasers ; the officers have sustained permanent eye @ @ @ @ @ @ @ officers responded to put out these fires , glass bottles were thrown and lasers – which can cause permanent blindness – were shined in their eyes , ” said Director Cline .
“ We have three officers who currently have eye injuries and they may not recover sight in those eyes from those laser attacks.
” Antifa are also using commercial fireworks to permanently injure or kill law enforcement .
Antifa has also used doxxing to punish and intimidate law enforcement officers and their families .
Armed rioters sometimes emerge out of mobs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gun to their chest .
The UN has nothing to say about human rights abuses like these , which have gone on for multiple weeks across America .
As soon as U.S. federal agents move in to restore law and order , the UN is quick to condemn , fueling the flames of civil unrest and domestic terror throughout American cities .

The United Nations (UN) has decided to side with Antifa and intervene in U.S. domestic affairs, condemning President Donald Trump for defending American cities against left-wing terrorism.
by Lance D Johnson
Liz Throssell, a UN human rights spokeswoman warned that unidentified federal agents are illegally detaining peaceful protestors, which may give rise to “arbitrary detention and other human rights violations.”
“The authorities should ensure that federal and local security forces deployed are properly and clearly identified and would use force only when necessary, proportionately and in accordance with international standards,” she said.
The UN did not condemn the mass violence toward law enforcement, initiated by left-wing terror groups. The UN did not denounce the human rights abuses that Antifa and Black Lives Matter militants have inflicted throughout America, which has become a stealth form of genocide toward whites.
Instead, the UN is right on time to defend the left-wing terror, to aid and abed the destruction of the United States from within, and to tear down the rule of law in America.
Not the first time either: United Nations Sides With Antifa Terrorists (It’s Time To Defund The UN)
It’s now apparent that foreign militaries and intelligence operations are behind the upheaval occurring in American cities, and these bad actors and governing bodies will clearly take advantage of the upheaval to take control and impose their will over the United States.
As federal agents try to save their country from violent left-wing mobs, will the UN send troops into the US to take out the federal agents, to occupy America, and to let terror reign?
Democrat Governors and Mayors openly invite terror and unrestrained human rights abuses
No one wants to see federal troops, Homeland Security officers, and Border and Custom patrols going to war in American cities, but the democrat governors and mayors have left the federal government with no choice but to intervene in strategic and powerful ways that restore law and order.
Federal agents have adapted new strategies to avoid doxxing and to avoid large confrontations in the city streets, protecting innocent lives as agents single out, detain, and prosecute violent criminals hiding within the mob.
The inner cities are burning and law enforcement is being overrun by racially-charged, left-wing anarchist mobs.
Portland Oregon mayor Ted Wheeler has stood with the arsonists, looters, violent criminals and domestic terrorists, watching his city go up in flames.
Standing with the terrorists, Wheeler has called Trump’s federal help “an explicit abuse of power” that puts “federal officers and Oregonians in danger.” He publicly stated that federal law enforcement should “leave our city.”
These weak democrat leaders have become the problem, openly permitting thugs to attack law enforcement, burn down businesses and threaten people’s lives.
These unrestrained human rights abuses are being openly encouraged by mayors like Ted Wheeler. The streets of Portland look like a war zone, as state and federal property comes under threat.
Defund The U.N.: United Nations Just Shared The Flag Of Antifa
UN turns blind eye toward widespread human rights abuses initiated by Antifa and Black Lives Matter
Three federal officers who were defending the Hatfield Federal Courthouse were attacked by antifa rioters.
Department of Homeland Security official Richard Cline confirmed that the officers were attacked by lasers; the officers have sustained permanent eye injuries from the attack.
“When officers responded to put out these fires, glass bottles were thrown and lasers – which can cause permanent blindness – were shined in their eyes,” said Director Cline.
“We have three officers who currently have eye injuries and they may not recover sight in those eyes from those laser attacks.”
Antifa are also using commercial fireworks to permanently injure or kill law enforcement.
Antifa has also used doxxing to punish and intimidate law enforcement officers and their families. Armed rioters sometimes emerge out of mobs and single out motorists, sticking a gun to their chest.
The UN has nothing to say about human rights abuses like these, which have gone on for multiple weeks across America.
As soon as U.S. federal agents move in to restore law and order, the UN is quick to condemn, fueling the flames of civil unrest and domestic terror throughout American cities.


humansarefree--2020-07-29--Man With 64 Child Sex Abuse Charges Gets No Jail

Nothing highlights the sheer lunacy of the United States justice system like the imprisonment of pot smokers while child abusers get slaps on the wrist .
William Edward Miller Jr. , 51 , reportedly raped a 14-year-old girl and later forced an 11-year-old boy to have sex with her as he watched , and he is a free man .
Meanwhile , hundreds of thousands of people are rotting in jail for weed .
According to police , Miller was arrested in February 2019 after the young girl told her parents what this monster made her do .
After an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ charged with 64 counts of sexual abuse of children .
Police also discovered images and videos of child pornography and bestiality on his phone and personal computer .
Police were tipped off about the files when Miller began calling friends from jail and asking them to destroy his laptop .
Despite overwhelming evidence that Miller is a child predator , and despite the trove of child pornography found on his laptop and phone , Miller received a slap on the wrist in the form of a deferred sentence — meaning he will not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ judge credited him with time served .
Miller pleaded guilty to felony sexual abuse of children and misdemeanor unsworn falsification to authorities before Cascade County District Judge Elizabeth Best .
These charges are due to the fact that Miller married a child — who is now 19 — and had nude photos of her prior to turning 19 .
The judge — who has likely sent countless people to decades behind bars for a plant — had no problem defending her actions .
“ I think it ’ s really easy and it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the bench , to use these offenses as an opportunity to grandstand and to make statements for the newspaper and TV , ” she said .
“ They ’ re very , very loaded charges .
They ’ re very difficult charges to defend against.
” Also read : Court Sentenced 77-Year-Old Disabled Veteran To Die In Prison For Treating Illness With Marijuana According to the Great Falls Tribune : The one count of sexual abuse of children that Miller was sentenced for stemmed from a single photo of a 17-year-old who is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Miller for three months .
Shiloh Young testified at the hearing that she took the photo of herself to help with body image issues and never meant for anyone else to see it .
“ William is a kind , compassionate , empathetic man .
Never has he manipulated or controlled me , ” his child bride said , later telling Best , “ I ask that we be free of this charge .
I feel that we have suffered enough , and I am not a victim of my husband.
” Due @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it could later allow Miller to withdraw his plea and have the charge removed from his record .
Miller could also petition to be removed from the sex offender registry at that time .
“ All this happened to me , my wife , our kid has just been a tragic thing , ” Miller told Best .
“ It ’ s destroyed our lives , and we ’ re suffering .
I ’ ve served time in jail for stuff that I didn ’ t even do , ” said the man @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his phone and laptop .
In the meantime , Sean Worsley , a disabled Black veteran , who was caught in Alabama with medical marijuana he uses to treat his PTSD , is facing down 5 years in a cage for this plant .
Related : Man Jailed 25 Years For Weed As Child Rapist Who Gave 11yo An STD , Gets Off With NO JAIL and NO JAIL For Man Who Kidnapped Child , Held Her In Dog Cage , Raped And Tortured Her

Nothing highlights the sheer lunacy of the United States justice system like the imprisonment of pot smokers while child abusers get slaps on the wrist.
by Matt Agorist
William Edward Miller Jr., 51, reportedly raped a 14-year-old girl and later forced an 11-year-old boy to have sex with her as he watched, and he is a free man. Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of people are rotting in jail for weed.
According to police, Miller was arrested in February 2019 after the young girl told her parents what this monster made her do. After an investigation, in August, Miller was charged with 64 counts of sexual abuse of children.
Police also discovered images and videos of child pornography and bestiality on his phone and personal computer. Police were tipped off about the files when Miller began calling friends from jail and asking them to destroy his laptop.
Despite overwhelming evidence that Miller is a child predator, and despite the trove of child pornography found on his laptop and phone, Miller received a slap on the wrist in the form of a deferred sentence — meaning he will not spend any time in jail because the judge credited him with time served.
Miller pleaded guilty to felony sexual abuse of children and misdemeanor unsworn falsification to authorities before Cascade County District Judge Elizabeth Best.
These charges are due to the fact that Miller married a child — who is now 19 — and had nude photos of her prior to turning 19.
The judge — who has likely sent countless people to decades behind bars for a plant — had no problem defending her actions.
“I think it’s really easy and it’s easy for courts, from the bench, to use these offenses as an opportunity to grandstand and to make statements for the newspaper and TV,” she said. “They’re very, very loaded charges. They’re very difficult charges to defend against.”
Also read: Court Sentenced 77-Year-Old Disabled Veteran To Die In Prison For Treating Illness With Marijuana
According to the Great Falls Tribune:
The one count of sexual abuse of children that Miller was sentenced for stemmed from a single photo of a 17-year-old who is now 19 and has been married to Miller for three months.
Shiloh Young testified at the hearing that she took the photo of herself to help with body image issues and never meant for anyone else to see it.
“William is a kind, compassionate, empathetic man. Never has he manipulated or controlled me,” his child bride said, later telling Best, “I ask that we be free of this charge. I feel that we have suffered enough, and I am not a victim of my husband.”
Due to the nature of the sentence, it could later allow Miller to withdraw his plea and have the charge removed from his record. Miller could also petition to be removed from the sex offender registry at that time.
“All this happened to me, my wife, our kid has just been a tragic thing,” Miller told Best.
“It’s destroyed our lives, and we’re suffering. I’ve served time in jail for stuff that I didn’t even do,” said the man caught with sexual images of children on his phone and laptop.
In the meantime, Sean Worsley, a disabled Black veteran, who was caught in Alabama with medical marijuana he uses to treat his PTSD, is facing down 5 years in a cage for this plant.
Related: Man Jailed 25 Years For Weed As Child Rapist Who Gave 11yo An STD, Gets Off With NO JAIL and NO JAIL For Man Who Kidnapped Child, Held Her In Dog Cage, Raped And Tortured Her


humansarefree--2020-07-30--Soros Has Pumped $50 MILLION (So Far) Into 2020 Democrat Election Campaigns

A report from the Washington Free Beacon notes that Billionaire elitist George Soros has pumped more than $ 50 million into Democrats ’ election campaigns for 2020 , a record amount , and around $ 30 million more than he spent in 2016 , with over three months still to go .
The report notes that Soros created a ‘ Democracy ’ PAC in 2019 , and that Federal Election Commission figures show the PAC distributed almost $ 17 million in last the quarter alone .
This means that Soros has pumped in $ 48 million to leftist groups .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Will Determine ‘ Fate Of The World ’ That figure is more than Amazon , Facebook , Boeing , and Google ’ s parent company , Alphabet , the report notes .
The report adds that Soros has also pledged $ 4 million directly to Democratic campaigns and committees , outside of the PAC .
This means that the $ 22 million Soros spent in 2016 has been more than doubled this time around .
The direct $ 4 million includes hundreds of thousands going to the DNC-led Democratic Grassroots Victory Fund , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Biden Victory Fund , according to the figures .
The fact that Soros diverts the money through the PAC and groups within the Open Society Foundations network means that his name is kept off the top of donation lists .
However , anyone taking more than a cursory look at where Democratic money is coming from can see that Soros is funding a huge chunk of the operation .
George Soros : “ I Fancy Myself As Some Kind Of God ” Earlier this month , in an interview with The New @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Patrick Gaspard announced that the organisation , headed by billionaire George Soros , is to “ double down ” on funding “ black-led justice organizations ” .
The interview was accompanied by a press release from the Open Society declaring that “ The largest share of this support — $ 150 million — will be through a set of five-year grants to Black-led justice organizations that helped to create and now sustain the momentum towards racial equality .
”

A report from the Washington Free Beacon notes that Billionaire elitist George Soros has pumped more than $50 million into Democrats’ election campaigns for 2020, a record amount, and around $30 million more than he spent in 2016, with over three months still to go.
The report notes that Soros created a ‘Democracy’ PAC in 2019, and that Federal Election Commission figures show the PAC distributed almost $17 million in last the quarter alone.
This means that Soros has pumped in $48 million to leftist groups.
George Soros In Davos: 2020 Election Will Determine ‘Fate Of The World’
That figure is more than Amazon, Facebook, Boeing, and Google’s parent company, Alphabet, the report notes.
The report adds that Soros has also pledged $4 million directly to Democratic campaigns and committees, outside of the PAC. This means that the $22 million Soros spent in 2016 has been more than doubled this time around.
The direct $4 million includes hundreds of thousands going to the DNC-led Democratic Grassroots Victory Fund, the Nancy Pelosi Victory Fund, and the Biden Victory Fund, according to the figures.
The fact that Soros diverts the money through the PAC and groups within the Open Society Foundations network means that his name is kept off the top of donation lists. However, anyone taking more than a cursory look at where Democratic money is coming from can see that Soros is funding a huge chunk of the operation.
George Soros: “I Fancy Myself As Some Kind Of God”
Earlier this month, in an interview with The New York Times, Open Society Foundations President Patrick Gaspard announced that the organisation, headed by billionaire George Soros, is to “double down” on funding “black-led justice organizations”.
The interview was accompanied by a press release from the Open Society declaring that “The largest share of this support — $150 million — will be through a set of five-year grants to Black-led justice organizations that helped to create and now sustain the momentum towards racial equality.”
Reference: Summit.news


humansarefree--2020-07-29--Another Failure of the COVID Diagnostic Test

In previous articles , I ’ ve detailed several key reasons why the PCR test is worthless and deceptive .
Here I discuss yet another reason : the uniformity of the test has never been properly validated .
Different labs come up with different results .
Let ’ s start here — the reference is the NY Times , January 22 , 2007 , “ Faith in Quick Tests Leads to Epidemic That Wasn ’ t. ” “ Dr .
Brooke Herndon , an internist at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center , could not stop coughing…By late April , other health care @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ For months , nearly everyone involved thought the medical center had had a huge whooping cough outbreak , with extensive ramifications .
Nearly 1,000 health care workers at the hospital in Lebanon , N.H. , were given a preliminary test and furloughed from work until their results were in ; 142 people , including Dr. Herndon , were told they appeared to have the disease ; and thousands were given antibiotics and a vaccine for protection .
Hospital beds were taken out of commission , including some in intensive care.
” “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ health care workers were dumbfounded to receive an e-mail message from the hospital administration informing them that the whole thing was a false alarm.
” “ Now , as they look back on the episode , epidemiologists and infectious disease specialists say the problem was that they placed too much faith in a quick and highly sensitive molecular test [ PCR ] that led them astray.
” “ There are no national data on pseudo-epidemics caused by an overreliance on such molecular tests , said Dr. Trish M. Perl , an epidemiologist at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Society of Health Care Epidemiologists of America .
But , she said , pseudo-epidemics happen all the time .
The Dartmouth case may have been one the largest , but it was by no means an exception , she said.
” “ Many of the new molecular [ PCR ] tests are quick but technically demanding , and each laboratory may do them in its own way .
These tests , called ‘ home brews , ’ are not commercially available , and there are no good estimates of their error rates .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ likely , and when hundreds or thousands of people are tested , as occurred at Dartmouth , false positives can make it seem like there is an epidemic.
” “ ’ You ’ re in a little bit of no man ’ s land , ’ with the new molecular [ PCR ] tests , said Dr. Mark Perkins , an infectious disease specialist and chief scientific officer at the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics , a nonprofit foundation supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation .
‘ All bets are off @ @ @ @ @ @ @ With pertussis , she [ Dr. Kretsinger , CDC ] said , ‘ there are probably 100 different P.C.R .
protocols and methods being used throughout the country , ’ and it is unclear how often any of them are accurate .
‘ We have had a number of outbreaks where we believe that despite the presence of P.C.R.-positive results , the disease was not pertussis , ’ Dr. Kretsinger added.
” “ Dr .
Cathy A. Petti , an infectious disease specialist at the University of Utah , said the story had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ big message is that every lab is vulnerable to having false positives , ’ Dr. Petti said .
‘ No single test result is absolute and that is even more important with a test result based on P.C.R ’ .
” —Sobering , to say the least .
Of course , some people will claim that since the date of the Times ’ article ( 2007 ) , vast improvements have been made in the PCR test .
Really ?
The truth is , something much worse is lurking in the weeds .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ PCR was approved for use in diagnostics : No large study validating the uniformity of PCR results , from lab to lab , has ever been done .
You would think at least a dozen very large studies had checked for uniform results , before unleashing the PCR on the public ; but no , this was not the case .
It is still not the case .
Here is what should have been done decades ago : Take a thousand volunteers .
Remove tissue samples from each person .
Send those samples @ @ @ @ @ @ @ labs run PCR and announce their findings for each volunteer .
“ We found the following virus in sample 1… ” Something simple like that .
Now compare the findings , in each of the 1000 cases , from all 30 labs .
Are the findings the same ?
Are the outcomes uniform all the way across the board ?
My money would be against it .
Strongly against .
But this is not the end of the process .
SEVERAL of these large-scale studies should be done .
In EACH study , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Why ?
Because , as you can readily see , the whole story about a current pandemic is riding on those tests .
The story , the containment measures , the lockdowns , the economic devastation , the human destruction—it ’ s all built on the presumption that the PCR is a valid test .
It ’ s unthinkable that these validation studies of the PCR weren ’ t done decades ago .
But they weren ’ t .
And there is only one reason why : to avoid the truth .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ t uniform .
They vary from lab to lab .
One lab says positive for virus B .
Another lab says negative for virus B .
Both labs are looking at the same sample .
No ?
Couldn ’ t be ?
Then prove it with the several large-scale studies I ’ m proposing .
I ’ ll give you a rough fictional analogy for the current testing situation : In an old-growth forest of immense trees , a government agency tests white spots found on some trunks .
The verdict ?
A @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which there is no remedy .
Without immediate and drastic action , the fungus will spread to the whole forest and destroy all the trees .
So a government contract is signed with a logging company , and workers move in and start cutting down many trees .
Meanwhile , another lab tests those white spots and reports they ’ re harmless bird droppings .
Yet another lab claims they ’ re a mild traditional fungus of no great concern .
The reports of these two labs are suppressed and censored .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and their business dries up .
An analyst at the US Forestry Service sends a memo to his boss .
It details the fact that the test which found deadly fungus is unreliable .
Different labs doing the test come up with different and conflicting results .
Worse yet , that test was never properly validated as a uniform process before being approved for use .
In other words , no one did a large study in which multiple labs used the test to determine the composition of spots found on trees @ @ @ @ @ @ @ labs came to the same conclusions using the test .
The Forestry analyst writes : “ The test has inherent flaws .
Different labs examining the same sample will always come up with different results .
This has disastrous consequences in the real world .
You can see that now ; we are cutting down half a forest to prevent the spread of a fungus which has been noticed for centuries , and never caused serious harm… ” The analyst is fired from his job and firmly reminded that he signed a non-disclosure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mouth shut .
The tree-cutting goes on .
A developer buys up the cleared land at a very low price… In essence , the pipeline of information from actually reliable sources , to the government , and then to the public , is narrowed , and guarded against unwelcome intrusions of TRUTH .
In the case of the PCR test , that ’ s what is happening .

In previous articles, I’ve detailed several key reasons why the PCR test is worthless and deceptive.
Here I discuss yet another reason: the uniformity of the test has never been properly validated. Different labs come up with different results.
Let’s start here — the reference is the NY Times, January 22, 2007, “Faith in Quick Tests Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t.”
“Dr. Brooke Herndon, an internist at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, could not stop coughing…By late April, other health care workers at the hospital were coughing…”
“For months, nearly everyone involved thought the medical center had had a huge whooping cough outbreak, with extensive ramifications. Nearly 1,000 health care workers at the hospital in Lebanon, N.H., were given a preliminary test and furloughed from work until their results were in; 142 people, including Dr. Herndon, were told they appeared to have the disease; and thousands were given antibiotics and a jjab for protection. Hospital beds were taken out of commission, including some in intensive care.”
“Then, about eight months later, health care workers were dumbfounded to receive an e-mail message from the hospital administration informing them that the whole thing was a false alarm.”
“Now, as they look back on the episode, epidemiologists and infectious disease specialists say the problem was that they placed too much faith in a quick and highly sensitive molecular test [PCR] that led them astray.”
“There are no national data on pseudo-epidemics caused by an overreliance on such molecular tests, said Dr. Trish M. Perl, an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins and past president of the Society of Health Care Epidemiologists of America. But, she said, pseudo-epidemics happen all the time. The Dartmouth case may have been one the largest, but it was by no means an exception, she said.”
“Many of the new molecular [PCR] tests are quick but technically demanding, and each laboratory may do them in its own way. These tests, called ‘home brews,’ are not commercially available, and there are no good estimates of their error rates. But their very sensitivity makes false positives likely, and when hundreds or thousands of people are tested, as occurred at Dartmouth, false positives can make it seem like there is an epidemic.”
“’You’re in a little bit of no man’s land,’ with the new molecular [PCR] tests, said Dr. Mark Perkins, an infectious disease specialist and chief scientific officer at the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, a nonprofit foundation supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. ‘All bets are off on exact performance’.”
“With pertussis, she [Dr. Kretsinger, CDC] said, ‘there are probably 100 different P.C.R. protocols and methods being used throughout the country,’ and it is unclear how often any of them are accurate. ‘We have had a number of outbreaks where we believe that despite the presence of P.C.R.-positive results, the disease was not pertussis,’ Dr. Kretsinger added.”
“Dr. Cathy A. Petti, an infectious disease specialist at the University of Utah, said the story had one clear lesson.”
“’The big message is that every lab is vulnerable to having false positives,’ Dr. Petti said. ‘No single test result is absolute and that is even more important with a test result based on P.C.R’.”
—Sobering, to say the least. Of course, some people will claim that since the date of the Times’ article (2007), vast improvements have been made in the PCR test.
Really? The truth is, something much worse is lurking in the weeds. It has been lurking ever since the PCR was approved for use in diagnostics:
No large study validating the uniformity of PCR results, from lab to lab, has ever been done.
You would think at least a dozen very large studies had checked for uniform results, before unleashing the PCR on the public; but no, this was not the case. It is still not the case.
Here is what should have been done decades ago:
Take a thousand volunteers. Remove tissue samples from each person. Send those samples to 30 different labs. Have the labs run PCR and announce their findings for each volunteer.
“We found the following virus in sample 1…” Something simple like that.
Now compare the findings, in each of the 1000 cases, from all 30 labs. Are the findings the same? Are the outcomes uniform all the way across the board?
My money would be against it. Strongly against.
But this is not the end of the process. SEVERAL of these large-scale studies should be done. In EACH study, there are 1000 volunteers and 30 labs.
Why? Because, as you can readily see, the whole story about a current pandemic is riding on those tests. The story, the containment measures, the lockdowns, the economic devastation, the human destruction—it’s all built on the presumption that the PCR is a valid test.
It’s unthinkable that these validation studies of the PCR weren’t done decades ago. But they weren’t. And there is only one reason why: to avoid the truth. The results of the PCR aren’t uniform. They vary from lab to lab.
One lab says positive for virus B. Another lab says negative for virus B. Both labs are looking at the same sample.
No? Couldn’t be? Then prove it with the several large-scale studies I’m proposing.
I’ll give you a rough fictional analogy for the current testing situation:
In an old-growth forest of immense trees, a government agency tests white spots found on some trunks. The verdict? A highly destructive and novel fungus, for which there is no remedy. Without immediate and drastic action, the fungus will spread to the whole forest and destroy all the trees.
So a government contract is signed with a logging company, and workers move in and start cutting down many trees.
Meanwhile, another lab tests those white spots and reports they’re harmless bird droppings. Yet another lab claims they’re a mild traditional fungus of no great concern.
The reports of these two labs are suppressed and censored. The labs are put on a quiet blacklist, and their business dries up.
The tree cutting continues.
An analyst at the US Forestry Service sends a memo to his boss. It details the fact that the test which found deadly fungus is unreliable. Different labs doing the test come up with different and conflicting results.
Worse yet, that test was never properly validated as a uniform process before being approved for use.
In other words, no one did a large study in which multiple labs used the test to determine the composition of spots found on trees. No one made sure that all labs came to the same conclusions using the test.
The Forestry analyst writes: “The test has inherent flaws. Different labs examining the same sample will always come up with different results. This has disastrous consequences in the real world. You can see that now; we are cutting down half a forest to prevent the spread of a fungus which has been noticed for centuries, and never caused serious harm…”
The analyst is fired from his job and firmly reminded that he signed a non-disclosure agreement, and he better keep his mouth shut.
The tree-cutting goes on. A developer buys up the cleared land at a very low price…
In essence, the pipeline of information from actually reliable sources, to the government, and then to the public, is narrowed, and guarded against unwelcome intrusions of TRUTH.
In the case of the PCR test, that’s what is happening.
By Jon Rappoport, Guest writer / Reference: NYtimes.com


humansarefree--2020-07-29--Bill Gates’ Recent Comments on Cv.19 Vacc. Side Effects Are Typical of Big Business

Bill Gates is back all over the media in recent days , making a few comments that help us to further understand his position on mass vaccination and the risks associated .
Firstly , though , it ’ s important to note that Gates also recently making a point to warn his audience and his believers that lies are spreading faster than truth .
“ Very incorrect things that are very titillating… can spread much faster than the truth on social media , and we ’ ve always seen that with vaccines… social media can make that even worse… these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being said on their platform and take things that are absolutely wrong and remove those things from the platform .
“ How you divide that up , and draw that line…these are complex issues .
It has been a spreader of lot of things…and how do you strike a balance ?
” The establishment is working very hard to dominate the narrative on Covid-19 , and with these comments , Bill Gates has thrown himself into the censorship arena , warning the poor public that dangerous information is the latest and greatest threat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deliver ‘ 7 billion vaccines to healthy people ‘ is no secret .
But this elaborate business plan , in which his foundation has hundreds of millions of dollars invested , will not work if the public distrusts a vaccine or simply does not trust the ‘ authorities.
’ To address this problem , a Gates-funded pandemic simulation in 2019 , Event 201 , outlined a strategy called ‘ the flood ’ aimed at flooding the internet with information favorable to the mission of the WHO , Gates Foundation , et al .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ here .
The other major component of controlling the narrative on the need and effectiveness of a mass vaccine involves minimizing known and probable risks of such vaccines .
Bill Gates has said in his own blog that mRNA and DNA vaccines will be the most likely candidates for a global vaccine , given that the vaccine could be produced without needing actual cultures of CV-19 , instead using synthesized DNA of the virus .
This would introduce a new level of risk , given that these types of vaccines have never yet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were hit by fact checkers when we tried to bring this information to the public , and subsequently found a Moderna white paper expressing the company ’ s uncertainty of the negative effects of DNA vaccines .
“ DNA vaccine work began thirty years ago , but as yet there are no licensed DNA vaccines and most remain in Phase 1 testing .
“ ( Figure 5 ) The key challenge associated with DNA vaccines is that they must penetrate the cell nucleus ( crossing two membranes ; the cytoplasm and the nucleus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ transcribed in the nucleus into mRNA before moving to the cytoplasm to stimulate antigen production .
“ This core complex pathway often requires both larger doses and special , often painful delivery devices using electric shocks or gold microspheres into person ’ s skin to deliver the DNA vaccine .
Once inside the nucleus , DNA vaccines have a risk of permanently changing a person ’ s DNA.
” [ Source ] You have to understand that this is an unreal amount of money at stake here .
Hundreds of billions are being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine , and to up the ante considerably , the stock market is now severely affected anytime any news of promise or failure in a vaccine is released .
This has all been positioned so that the entire world economy hinges on whether or not a vaccine is found .
Given this dynamic , of course a business man like Gates is going to downplay the risks while talking up the dire need for his product .
It ’ s sales 101 .
In 2017 , he did bring it up risk in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , saying that Trump asked him for his opinion on setting up a commission looking at the ill effects of vaccines .
“ …Robert Kennedy Jr. was advising him that vaccines were causing bad things and I said ‘ no , that ’ s a dead end , that would be a bad thing , don ’ t do that.
” [ Source ] Looking at the potential negative effects of vaccines is a ‘ bad thing ’ according to Bill Gates , who , again , personally has hundreds of millions of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Why would considering the risks of a medicine be considered a ‘ bad thing ?
’ This is especially telling given the backdrop of heavy censorship of information about hydroxychloroquine .
CBS News ’ Norah O ’ Donnel recently asked Gates about a Moderna vaccine trial in which many participants reported serious adverse reactions .
Gates ’ reply and mannerisms further clarify his position on vaccine damage .
If you were to approach the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and tell him that thousands of innocent people were dying of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the US Military would absolutely tell you that collateral damage is just a cost of war .
The developers of the bombs would also call the dead collateral damage , in the name of a greater good .
That ’ s what Gates is doing here in this interview , he is downplaying the risks and brushing off anyone negatively impacted , in order to give the impression that the benefits of his business plan outweigh the potential harms .
Norah O ’ Donnell : “ After the second dose at least @ @ @ @ @ @ @ side effect , ranging from severe chills to fevers .
So , are these vaccines safe ?
” Bill Gates : “ Well the , uh , the FDA , not being pressured , will look hard at that .
The FDA is the gold standard of regulators , uh , and their current guidance on this , if they stick with that , is , is very , very appropriate .
“ Uh , and , you know , they , it , and , the , the side effects were not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t cause permanent health problems for the things , uh , you know , Moderna did have to go with the fairly high dose , and so , uh , you know , to get the antibodies , some of the other vaccines , uh , are going , able to go with lower doses to get , uh , responses that are , are pretty high , including the JMJ and the Phizer .
“ So , there ’ s a lot of characteristics of these vaccines , uh , it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of them , uh , that are going out there… Norah O ’ Donnell : “ You know the data better than I do , but Bill , the data that everybody with a high dose had a side effect.
” Bill Gates : “ Yeah , but some of that is not dramatic , where it ’ s just , you know super painful , but yes , they ’ re , we need to make sure there ’ s not severe side effects .
The FDA , uh , I , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ good job of that , uh despite the pressure.
” Norah O ’ Donnell : “ How many doses of the vaccine will we need ?
” Bill Gates : “ None of the vaccines at this point appear like they ’ ll work with a single dose .
That was the hope at the very beginning , uh , maybe one of them , particularly in the second generation will surprise us .
We hope just two [ doses ] , although in the elderly sometimes , uh , it takes more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lots of elderly people in the trial will give us that data.
” Norah O ’ Donnell : “ You ’ ve said more than 7 billion doses is what we ’ ll need… ” Here is that clip : In short , Gates just passed the buck for vaccine safety to the FDA , diminished serious side effects as collateral damage in the process to invent this vaccine , and also planted the seed in public consciousness that multiple doses will be required .
Let that sink in .

Microsoft co-founder and outspoken eugenicist Billy Boy has a plan to tackle the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. But it doesn’t involve actually supporting the human immune system through proper nutrition.
Instead, Gates wants to jab everyone with a future jjab, as well as indefinitely force people to social distance from one another and remain in isolation for their own alleged protection.
During a recent interview with “CBS This Morning” co-host Anthony Mason, Gates divulged how he believes that the federal government needs to “set the priorities” on testing so that “we can all go back to some level of normalcy.”
According to Gates, the executive branch along with so-called “experts” in public health need to be putting extreme pressure on the governors of all 50 states to implement medical martial law, in violation of the Constitution, because this is the only way to tackle the crisis.
Failing at any point to mention the benefits of things like zinc, vitamin D and vitamin C for natural immune support, as well as any of the treatment methods successfully employed in South Korea, Gates instead spoke of harsh government restrictions, chemical jjabs and even novel Mark of the Beast microchips as the “solutions” to the pandemic situation. (…)
Billy Boy says mass gatherings and other “optional” activities “may not come back at all” unless you’re vaccinated
When asked if he’s been in touch with President Trump about any of this, Gates claimed that he hasn’t been.
Instead, his foundation is “trying to be as helpful in a very constructive way as possible,” he says, which to him means partnering with Big Pharma, the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in order to “work together on the jjab and the drugs.”
Even more chilling was the response that Gates gave to the question about when things might return back to normal, or at least something that resembles normal.
While schools may open sooner rather than later, he says, other “optional” activities such as “mass gatherings” could be gone for good – unless people agree to get vaccinated, of course.
“And so until you’re widely vaccinated, those may not come back at all,” Gates stated openly about the mandatory vaccination agenda that’s conveniently attached to the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis.
In other words, you more than likely won’t be allowed to participate in the New World Order post-Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) unless you agree to be vaccinated with whatever chemical jab that Gates and whomever else is scheming this all up behind the scenes dictate is “necessary” for a “safe” and “healthy” future world.
Meanwhile, Gates is already preparing for “the next pandemic,” which will surely come with its own litany of new draconian measures. After all, he “think[s] about pandemics a lot.”
Reference: NaturalNews.com (excerpt)
Disclaimer: The information found here is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment and is for information only. Always seek the advice of your physician or another qualified health provider with any questions about your medical condition and/or current medication.


humansarefree--2020-07-29--Zuckerberg Target of Criminal Referral for Multiple Perjury Counts During Congressional Hearings

U.S .
Congressman Matt Gaetz ( FL-01 ) filed a criminal referral against Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg for making materially false statements to Congress while under oath during two joint hearings in Congress on April 10th , 2018 and April 11th , 2018 .
During a hearing of the House Energy and Commerce Committee and also a joint hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Senate Commerce , Science , and Transportation Committee , Mr. Zuckerberg repeatedly and categorically denied his company engaged in bias against conservative speech , persons , policies , or politics and also denied that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ President Donald Trump and other conservatives .
In June of 2020 however , Project Veritas published the results of an undercover investigation featuring two whistleblowers who worked as Facebook ’ s “ content moderators , ” revealing that the overwhelming majority of content filtered by Facebook ’ s AI program was content in support of President Donald Trump , Republican candidates for office , or conservatism in general .
“ Oversight is an essential part of Congress ’ constitutional authority , ” Congressman Gaetz states in the letter .
“ As a member @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Zuckerberg ’ s veracity , and challenge his willingness to cooperate with our oversight authority , diverting congressional resources during time-sensitive investigations , and materially impeding our work .
Such misrepresentations are not only unfair , they are potentially illegal and fraudulent.
” The letter refers Mr. Zuckerberg to the Department of Justice for an investigation into the false statements made to Congress while under oath .
Full text of the letter sent to Attorney General William Barr may be found below : VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION The Honorable William Barr Attorney General of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington , DC 20530 I write to urge you to investigate the conduct of Mark Zuckerberg , CEO of Facebook , Inc. , before the United States Congress .
On April 10 , 2018 , Mr. Zuckerberg testified in a joint hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Senate Commerce , Science , and Transportation Committee .
The next day , Mr. Zuckerberg testified before the House Energy and Commerce Committee .
On both occasions , members of Congress asked Mr. Zuckerberg about allegations that Facebook censored @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump and other conservatives .
In his responses , Mr. Zuckerberg repeatedly and categorically denied any bias against conservative speech , persons , policies , or politics .
Mr. Zuckerberg also dismissed the suggestion that Facebook exercises any form of editorial manipulation .
However , recent reports from Project Veritas , featuring whistleblowers who worked as Facebook ’ s “ content moderators , ” have shown ample evidence of such bias and manipulation .
Two content moderators , Zach McElroy and Ryan Hartwig , both worked on the Facebook content review flow generated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ AI ) program for flagging questionable content .
McElroy worked at the Facebook-Cognizant facility in Tampa , Florida and Hartwig worked at the Facebook-Cognizant facility in Phoenix , Arizona .
On June 23 , 2020 , Project Veritas published the results of an undercover investigation featuring the aforementioned whistleblowers .
Their report revealed that the overwhelming majority of content filtered by Facebook ’ s AI program was content in support of President Donald Trump , Republican candidates for office , or conservatism in general .
This alone is already an indication of bias @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Facebook ’ s AI , moderators reviewed the filtered content , and adjudicated whether it qualified as removable .
According to the Veritas report and undercover footage , the adjudicators were outspoken about their political bias against Republicans , and actively chose to eliminate otherwise-allowable content from the platform and from public view simply due to its political orientation .
This arbitrary and capricious behavior is not done in good faith , and falls outside of the express intent of §230 of the Communications Decency Act , which affords Facebook liability protection as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ good faith.
” Additionally , these facts are in direct contrast to Mr. Zuckerberg ’ s testimony before Congress where he stated under oath that Facebook is a politically-neutral platform , and that he personally is working to root out any employees who are restricting speech based on Silicon Valley ’ s overwhelmingly leftist culture .
Project Veritas ’ undercover footage shows that a great deal of “ political speech ” supporting the President was labeled “ hate speech , ” or was considered in violation Facebook ’ s “ Community Standards.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ promoting violence against the President and his supporters was labeled as merely “ political , ” and was thus allowed to stay on the platform .
For example , McElroy captured a shot of a Facebook corporate ruling that an illustration of a hand holding a knife slashing the throat of the President , captioned by “ Fuck Trump , ” would be allowed as political speech , despite being in clear violation of Facebook ’ s guidelines .
In this case , the guidance to content moderators instructed them to watch for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the image .
Facebook ’ s AI screening content is not politically neutral .
Neither are the moderators hired to review content flagged by the AI program .
This stands in opposition to Mr. Zuckerberg ’ s congressional testimony , and violates the “ good faith ” provision of Section 230 ( c ) ( 2 ) ( A ) of the Communications Decency Act .
Accordingly , I respectfully refer Mr. Zuckerberg to the Department for an investigation of potential violations of 18 U.S.C .
§§1001 , 1505 , and 1621 for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ testifying under oath .
Oversight is an essential part of Congress ’ constitutional authority .
Customarily , Congress is grateful to citizens who come forward with relevant information in good faith , as the aforementioned whistleblowers have done .
As a member of this body , I question Mr. Zuckerberg ’ s veracity , and challenge his willingness to cooperate with our oversight authority , diverting congressional resources during time-sensitive investigations , and materially impeding our work .
Such misrepresentations are not only unfair , they are potentially illegal and fraudulent .
I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and proper consideration .
If you need further clarification , please contact my chief of staff , Jillian Lane-Wyant..

U.S. Congressman Matt Gaetz (FL-01) filed a criminal referral against Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg for making materially false statements to Congress while under oath during two joint hearings in Congress on April 10th, 2018 and April 11th, 2018.
During a hearing of the House Energy and Commerce Committee and also a joint hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee, Mr. Zuckerberg repeatedly and categorically denied his company engaged in bias against conservative speech, persons, policies, or politics and also denied that Facebook censored and suppressed content supportive of President Donald Trump and other conservatives.
In June of 2020 however, Project Veritas published the results of an undercover investigation featuring two whistleblowers who worked as Facebook’s “content moderators,” revealing that the overwhelming majority of content filtered by Facebook’s AI program was content in support of President Donald Trump, Republican candidates for office, or conservatism in general.
“Oversight is an essential part of Congress’ constitutional authority,” Congressman Gaetz states in the letter.
“As a member of this body, I question Mr. Zuckerberg’s veracity, and challenge his willingness to cooperate with our oversight authority, diverting congressional resources during time-sensitive investigations, and materially impeding our work. Such misrepresentations are not only unfair, they are potentially illegal and fraudulent.”
The letter refers Mr. Zuckerberg to the Department of Justice for an investigation into the false statements made to Congress while under oath.
Full text of the letter sent to Attorney General William Barr may be found below:
VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION
The Honorable William Barr
Attorney General of the United States
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20530
Dear Attorney General Barr:
I write to urge you to investigate the conduct of Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook, Inc., before the United States Congress.
On April 10, 2018, Mr. Zuckerberg testified in a joint hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee. The next day, Mr. Zuckerberg testified before the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
On both occasions, members of Congress asked Mr. Zuckerberg about allegations that Facebook censored and suppressed content supportive of President Donald Trump and other conservatives.
In his responses, Mr. Zuckerberg repeatedly and categorically denied any bias against conservative speech, persons, policies, or politics. Mr. Zuckerberg also dismissed the suggestion that Facebook exercises any form of editorial manipulation.
However, recent reports from Project Veritas, featuring whistleblowers who worked as Facebook’s “content moderators,” have shown ample evidence of such bias and manipulation.
Two content moderators, Zach McElroy and Ryan Hartwig, both worked on the Facebook content review flow generated by Facebook’s artificial intelligence (AI) program for flagging questionable content.
McElroy worked at the Facebook-Cognizant facility in Tampa, Florida and Hartwig worked at the Facebook-Cognizant facility in Phoenix, Arizona.
On June 23, 2020, Project Veritas published the results of an undercover investigation featuring the aforementioned whistleblowers.
Their report revealed that the overwhelming majority of content filtered by Facebook’s AI program was content in support of President Donald Trump, Republican candidates for office, or conservatism in general. This alone is already an indication of bias within the platform.
Once flagged by Facebook’s AI, moderators reviewed the filtered content, and adjudicated whether it qualified as removable.
According to the Veritas report and undercover footage, the adjudicators were outspoken about their political bias against Republicans, and actively chose to eliminate otherwise-allowable content from the platform and from public view simply due to its political orientation.
This arbitrary and capricious behavior is not done in good faith, and falls outside of the express intent of §230 of the Communications Decency Act, which affords Facebook liability protection as long as the platform moderates content in “good faith.”
Additionally, these facts are in direct contrast to Mr. Zuckerberg’s testimony before Congress where he stated under oath that Facebook is a politically-neutral platform, and that he personally is working to root out any employees who are restricting speech based on Silicon Valley’s overwhelmingly leftist culture.
Project Veritas’ undercover footage shows that a great deal of “political speech” supporting the President was labeled “hate speech,” or was considered in violation Facebook’s “Community Standards.”
At the same time, speech promoting violence against the President and his supporters was labeled as merely “political,” and was thus allowed to stay on the platform.
For example, McElroy captured a shot of a Facebook corporate ruling that an illustration of a hand holding a knife slashing the throat of the President, captioned by “Fuck Trump,” would be allowed as political speech, despite being in clear violation of Facebook’s guidelines.
In this case, the guidance to content moderators instructed them to watch for hostility directed at the gallery that posted the image.
Facebook’s AI screening content is not politically neutral. Neither are the moderators hired to review content flagged by the AI program. This stands in opposition to Mr. Zuckerberg’s congressional testimony, and violates the “good faith” provision of Section 230(c)(2)(A) of the Communications Decency Act.
Accordingly, I respectfully refer Mr. Zuckerberg to the Department for an investigation of potential violations of 18 U.S.C. §§1001, 1505, and 1621 for materially false statements made to Congress while testifying under oath.
Oversight is an essential part of Congress’ constitutional authority. Customarily, Congress is grateful to citizens who come forward with relevant information in good faith, as the aforementioned whistleblowers have done.
As a member of this body, I question Mr. Zuckerberg’s veracity, and challenge his willingness to cooperate with our oversight authority, diverting congressional resources during time-sensitive investigations, and materially impeding our work. Such misrepresentations are not only unfair, they are potentially illegal and fraudulent.
I hope you will give this referral full and proper consideration. If you need further clarification, please contact my chief of staff, Jillian Lane-Wyant..
Sincerely,
Matt Gaetz
Member of Congress
Source: Truepundit.com


humansarefree--2020-07-29--Vacc. Companies Partner with Mastercard to Merge Vacc. with Cashless Money System

A new biometric identity platform partnered with the Gates-funded GAVI vaccine alliance and Mastercard will launch in West Africa and combine COVID-19 vaccinations , cashless payments , and potential law enforcement applications .
A biometric digital identity platform that “ evolves just as you evolve ” is set to be introduced in “ low-income , remote communities ” in West Africa thanks to a public-private partnership between the Bill Gates-backed GAVI vaccine alliance , Mastercard and the AI-powered “ identity authentication ” company , Trust Stamp .
The program , which was first launched in late 2018 , will see @ @ @ @ @ @ @ integrated into the GAVI-Mastercard “ Wellness Pass , ” a digital vaccination record and identity system that is also linked to Mastercard ’ s click-to-play system that powered by its AI and machine learning technology called NuData .
Mastercard , in addition to professing its commitment to promoting “ centralized record keeping of childhood immunization ” also describes itself as a leader toward a “ World Beyond Cash , ” and its partnership with GAVI marks a novel approach towards linking a biometric digital identity system , vaccination records , and a payment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The effort , since its launch nearly two years ago , has been funded via $ 3.8 million in GAVI donor funds in addition to a matched donation of the same amount by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation .
In early June , GAVI reported that Mastercard ’ s Wellness Pass program would be adapted in response to the coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) pandemic .
Around a month later , Mastercard announced that Trust Stamp ’ s biometric identity platform would be integrated into Wellness Pass as Trust Stamp ’ s system @ @ @ @ @ @ @ areas of the world lacking internet access or cellular connectivity and also does not require knowledge of an individual ’ s legal name or identity to function .
The Wellness Program involving GAVI , Mastercard , and Trust Stamp will soon be launched in West Africa and will be coupled with a Covid-19 vaccination program once a vaccine becomes available .
The push to implement biometrics as part of national ID registration systems has been ongoing for many years on the continent and has become a highly politicized issue in several African countries @ @ @ @ @ @ @ often revolves around the costs surrounding them , such as the biometric voter management system that the Electoral Commission of Ghana has been trying to implement ahead of their 2020 general election in December .
Bright Simons , honorary VP of the IMANI policy think tank , has questioned the “ budgetary allocation ” for the new system , claiming that the “ unnecessary registration of 17 million people all over again ” represents millions of dollars “ being blown for reasons that nobody can explain in this country.
” Trust Stamp ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by Mastercard ’ s massive investment in the company in February , utilizes a technology it calls Evergreen Hash that creates an AI-generated “ 3D mask ” based on a single photo of a person ’ s face , palm or fingerprint .
Once this “ mask ” is created , much of the original data is discarded and encryption keys are created in place of a person ’ s name or other more traditional identifiers .
“ Only a small percentage of the data that originally existed is in the hash , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stated .
“ What you have is something safer for storing because it can ’ t be used to directly identify you .
No one would recognize you in this huge jumble of numbers.
” The result , according to Genner , is an “ irreversible non-personally identifiable information ” system that “ protects privacy , reduces potential for misuse and allows effective inclusion when there is no other form of legal record.
” Genner also explained in a recent press release that the unique “ hash ” is capable of “ evolving @ @ @ @ @ @ @ health information is created every time a child or individual gets a vaccine .
Trust Stamp ’ s AI algorithms can accurately determine if different hashes belong to the same individual , meaning that “ the hash evolves over time just as you evolve , ” said Genner .
It is unclear how much the Wellness Pass initiative is motivated by public health concerns as opposed to free market considerations .
Indeed , the GAVI alliance , largely funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates and Rockefeller Foundations , as well as allied @ @ @ @ @ @ @ principally concerned with improving “ the health of markets for vaccines and other immunization products , ” rather than the health of individuals , according to its own website .
Similarly , Mastercard ’ s GAVI partnership is directly linked to its “ World Beyond Cash ” effort , which mainly bolsters its business model that has long depended on a reduction in the use of physical cash .
Trust Stamp also shares this market-focused vision for its digital identity system as the company has stated that it is looking for new commercialization @ @ @ @ @ @ @ specifically with prison systems .
Talks with private and public prison systems have revealed an interest in their utilization of Trust Stamp ’ s technology to provide identification for individuals on parole “ without making them pay for pricey ankle bracelets that monitor their every move , ” as Trust Stamp ’ s platform would ostensibly provide that same function but in a “ touchless ” and less expensive manner .
Trust Stamp ’ s interest in providing its technology to both COVID-19 response and to law enforcement is part of a growing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to COVID-19 also offer the same solutions to prison systems and law enforcement for the purposes of surveillance and “ predictive policing.
” For instance , contact tracing software originally introduced as part of the COVID-19 response has since been used by police departments across the U.S. to track protesters during the country ’ s recent bouts of protests and civil unrest .
Similarly , a controversial Israeli tech firm currently being used in Rhode Island offers AI-powered predictive analytic to identify likely future COVID-19 hotspots and individuals likely to contract COVID-19 in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the ability to predict future locations of and participants in riots and civil unrest .
What is perhaps most alarming about this new “ Wellness Pass ” initiative , is that it links these “ dual use ” digital solutions to cashless payment solutions that could soon become mandated as anything over than touchless , cashless , methods of payment have been treated as potential modes for contagion by GAVI-aligned groups like the World Health Organization , among others , since the pandemic was first declared earlier this year .

Many employers across the globe are moving towards microchip technology to keep track of the employees. They often forcefully microchip employees to track their activity, and inactive, hours.
Michigan House passed a bill in June, which makes microchipping a voluntary option for employees.
Lenawee County’s Representative, Bronna Kahle, sponsored the bill. Kahle said that technology is evolving at a rapid pace, but Michigan employers have to take care of company interests and interests of their employees’ right to privacy.
She further explained how a growing number of companies are looking forward to microchip employees.
These grain-sized chips are implanted in a person’s hand to keep a track of their productivity. With accurate tracking, managers can find new ways to improve efficiency.
These RFID microchips are replacing ID badges, security clearance devices, and time cards. Some even come with credit card-like technology that allows the person to make financial transactions.
While the chips are not widely used yet, it can become the standard in Michigan in the coming years.
“While these miniature devices are on the rise, so are the calls of workers to have their privacy protected,” Kahle said.
The bill does not say companies cannot opt for chips at all. Companies now just can’t make it mandatory for the employees. Indiana also passed similar legislation for microchip implantation.
With the pandemic and social distancing guidelines still in place, companies like Engineering see microchips as an efficient method of tracking.
These chips help keep track of evacuation efforts at high-risk oil rigs. But experts are of the opinion that the information stored in the chips is not guarded safely.
Information can be easily compromised, especially when the employees are outside their workplace.
By Mayukh Saha, Truth Theory


humansarefree--2020-07-30--Jenna Jameson (Victim of Child Sex Trafficking) Says Jeffrey Epstein Is An ‘Amateur’ & Children Are

Jenna Jameson (Victim of Child Sex Trafficking) Says Jeffrey Epstein Is An ‘Amateur’ & Children Are ‘Hunted’ At ‘Parties’

In a series of recent tweets , Jenna Jameson shared that she has “ heard terrible things about “ The Hunt.
” Implying that societal elite people “ hunt ” children as young as 4 , at “ parties.
” She went on to state that “ These topics circulate ” among the elite .
She also tweeted about Hollywood , expressing that , “ The reason why Hollywood has been so incredibly silent on child sex trafficking is not only do they partake , they are covering for the big league hitters .
The ones that hide in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Just prior to those tweets , she brought up Jeffrey Epstein , tweeting the following : “ If you think Epstein is somehow unique , you ’ re sadly mistaken… there are MANY Epstein ’ s , that make him look like an amateur .
Child hunting games , sacrifice , torture of children as young as 2 .
The elite.
” Jameson ’ s perspective is quite unique .
As she ’ s shared many times before , she was raped as a child and groomed for the porn industry .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ child sex trafficking : We ’ ve been writing about this topic quite some time , especially more so this year with all of the recent revelations that have made their way into the mainstream regarding elite child sex trafficking .
Epstein ’ s case goes beyond just the dealings involving Maxwell and himself , and the issue of trafficking very young children , and teenage children , it is much more widespread than Epstein .
Epstein is being made out to be a rich billionaire with connections that allowed him to entice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sexually abused , but we really need to talk about just how widespread this type of abuse is among people who are made out to be idols , like multiple Vatican officials , politicians and celebrities .
If you want to dive deeper , I recently published this article that does just that .
This kind of stuff is all over the place , and the theme involves high ranking people .
As a paper published in European Psychiatry details : “ Research eventually led to the Franklin scandal that broke in 1989 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ around the US to be abused by high ranking ‘ Establishment ’ members .
“ Former state senator John W DeCamp , cited as one of the most effective legislators in Nebraska history , is today attorney for two of the abuse victims .
“ A 15 year old girl disclosed that she had been abused since the age of 9 and was exposed since the age of 9 and was exposed to ‘ ritual murder ’ of a new born girl , a small boy ( who was subsequently fried and eaten @ @ @ @ @ @

In a series of recent tweets, Jenna Jameson shared that she has “heard terrible things about “The Hunt.” Implying that societal elite people “hunt” children as young as 4, at “parties.”
She went on to state that “These topics circulate” among the elite. She also tweeted about Hollywood, expressing that,
“The reason why Hollywood has been so incredibly silent on child sex trafficking is not only do they partake, they are covering for the big league hitters. The ones that hide in the shadows under the cover of a crown.”
Just prior to those tweets, she brought up Jeffrey Epstein, tweeting the following:
“If you think Epstein is somehow unique, you’re sadly mistaken… there are MANY Epstein’s, that make him look like an amateur. Child hunting games, sacrifice, torture of children as young as 2. The elite.”
Jameson’s perspective is quite unique. As she’s shared many times before, she was raped as a child and groomed for the porn industry. She claims she is a victim of child sex trafficking:
4 Eyewitnesses Testify: European Royals Allegedly Killing Children in Human Hunting Parties
We’ve been writing about this topic quite some time, especially more so this year with all of the recent revelations that have made their way into the mainstream regarding elite child sex trafficking.
Epstein’s case goes beyond just the dealings involving Maxwell and himself, and the issue of trafficking very young children, and teenage children, it is much more widespread than Epstein.
Epstein is being made out to be a rich billionaire with connections that allowed him to entice young women into his home to be sexually abused, but we really need to talk about just how widespread this type of abuse is among people who are made out to be idols, like multiple Vatican officials, politicians and celebrities.
If you want to dive deeper, I recently published this article that does just that.
This kind of stuff is all over the place, and the theme involves high ranking people. As a paper published in European Psychiatry details:
“Research eventually led to the Franklin scandal that broke in 1989 when hundreds of children were apparently flown around the US to be abused by high ranking ‘Establishment’ members.
“Former state senator John W DeCamp, cited as one of the most effective legislators in Nebraska history, is today attorney for two of the abuse victims.
“A 15 year old girl disclosed that she had been abused since the age of 9 and was exposed since the age of 9 and was exposed to ‘ritual murder’ of a new born girl, a small boy (who was subsequently fried and eaten) and three others.”
By Arjun Walia (excerpt)


humansarefree--2020-07-30--Ron Paul: Why Did They Censor ‘America’s Frontline Doctors’?

A viral video made by medical professionals opposing the prevailing mainstream view of how to manage the coronavirus outbreak was @ @ @ @ @ hole in an effort seemingly coordinated by all social media outlets .
Why are alternate @ @ @ @ @ fide scientists not allowed in the United States ?
Also in today ’ s Liberty @ @ @ @ @ ; Vietnam versus Sweden ; Senate comes to the rescue ?

A viral video made by medical professionals opposing the prevailing mainstream view of how to manage the coronavirus outbreak was nearly sent down the memory hole in an effort seemingly coordinated by all social media outlets.
Why are alternate scientific views held by bona fide scientists not allowed in the United States?
Also in today’s Liberty Report: Suicides versus Covid; Vietnam versus Sweden; Senate comes to the rescue?
Tune in to today’s Liberty Report:
Reference: YouTube.com