humansarefree--2020-05-13--Google: One of the Biggest Threats to Peace and Freedom the World Has Ever Known

Robert Epstein , who received his Ph.D. in psychology from Harvard in 1981 and served as the former editor in chief at Psychology Today , is now a senior research psychologist for the American Institute of Behavioral Research and Technology , where for the last decade he has helped expose Google ’ s manipulative and deceptive practices .
He explains what got him interested in investigating the internet search monopoly in the first place : “ In 2012 , January 1st , I received some emails from Google saying my website contained malware and that they were somehow blocking access @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one of Google ’ s blacklists .
My website did contain some malware .
It was pretty easy to get rid of , but it turns out it ’ s hard to get off of a Google blacklist .
That ’ s a big problem .
I started looking at Google just a little bit differently .
I wondered , first of all , why they were notifying me about this rather than some government agency or some nonprofit organization ?
Why was a private company notifying me ?
In other words , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
Second , I learned they had no customer service department , which seemed very strange , so if you have a problem with Google , then you have a problem because they don ’ t help you solve the problem .
I learned also that although you can get onto a blacklist in a split second , it can take weeks to get off a blacklist .
There have been businesses that have gotten onto their blacklists and have gone out of business while they ’ re trying to straighten out the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ my eye — because I ’ ve been a programmer my whole life — was I couldn ’ t figure out how they were blocking access to my website , not just through their own products … Google.com , the search engine , or through Chrome , which is their browser , but through Safari , which is an Apple product , through Firefox , which is a browser run by Mozilla , a nonprofit organization .
How was Google blocking access through so many different means ?
The point is I just @ @ @ @ @ @ @ company , and later in 2012 , I happened to be looking at a growing literature , which was about the power of search rankings to impact sales .
This was in the marketing field and it just was astonishing .
In other words , if you could push yourself up one more notch in their search results , that could make the difference between success or failure for your company ; it could mean a lot more income .
It turns out that this initial research was saying that people really trust @ @ @ @ @ @ @ simply asked a question .
I wondered whether , if people trust those higher rank search results , I could use search results to influence people ’ s opinions , maybe even their votes.
” What Epstein discovered through his subsequent research , which began in 2013 , is that yes , biased search results can indeed be used to influence public opinion and sway undecided voters .
What ’ s more , the strength of that influence was shocking .
He also eventually discovered how Google is able to block website access @ @ @ @ @ @ @ His findings were published in 2016 in U.S. News & World Report.1 In other words , from their perspective , the value these tools have is they give them more information about you .
Surveillance is what they do.
” 2 .
They ’ re a censoring agency with the ability to restrict or block access to websites across the internet , thus deciding what people can and can not see .
They even have the ability to block access to entire countries and the internet as a whole .
The most crushing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is that you don ’ t know what you don ’ t know .
If a certain type of information is removed from search , and you don ’ t know it should exist somewhere , you ’ ll never go looking for it .
And , when searching for information online , how would you know that certain websites or pages have been removed from the search results in the first place ?
The answer is , you don ’ t .
For example , Google has been investing in DNA repositories @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are adding DNA information to our profiles .
According to Epstein , Google has taken over the national DNA repository , but articles about that — which he has cited in his own writings — have all vanished .
3 .
They have the power to manipulate public opinion through search rankings and other means .
“ To me , that ’ s the scariest area , ” Epstein says , “ because Google is shaping the opinions , thinking , beliefs , attitudes , purchases and votes of billions of people around @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re doing so … and perhaps even more shocking , without leaving a paper trail for authorities to trace .
They ’ re using new techniques of manipulation that have never existed before in human history and they are for the most part , subliminal … but they don ’ t produce tiny shifts .
They produce enormous shifts in people ’ s thinking , very rapidly .
Some of the techniques I ’ ve discovered are among the largest behavioral effects ever discovered in the behavioral sciences.
” While surveillance is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ revenue — which exceeds $ 130 billion a year — comes almost exclusively from advertising .
All that personal information you ’ ve provided them through their various products is sold to advertisers looking for a specific target audience .
How Google Can Shift Your Perception Without Your Knowledge Epstein ’ s controlled , randomized , double-blind and counterbalanced experiments have revealed a number of different ways in which Google can shift public perception .
The first effect he discovered is called SEME , which stands for search engine manipulation effect .
For @ @ @ @ @ @ @ used to identify this effect , please listen to the interview .
In summary , the aim of his experiment was to see whether search results biased toward a particular political candidate would be capable of shifting users ’ political opinion and leanings .
“ I had predicted , when we first did this , that we would get a shift , ” Epstein says , “ because … people do trust higher ranked search results , and of course we had biased the search results so that , if in that first @ @ @ @ @ @ @ high-ranking search result , that would connect them to a webpage which made one candidate look much better than the other … I predicted we could get a shift in voting preferences of 2 % to 3 % .
I was way off .
We got … a shift of 48 % , which I thought must be an error because that ’ s crazy … I should note that in almost all of our experiments , especially those early ones , we deliberately used undecided voters .
That ’ s the key @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the opinions or voting preferences of people who are partisan , who are strongly committed to one party or another , but people who are undecided , those are the people who are very vulnerable .
In our experiments , we always find a way to use undecided voters .
In these early experiments , the way we guaranteed that our voters were undecided was by using people from the U.S. as our participants , but the election we chose was the 2010 election for the prime minister of Australia .
They ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , real search results , real webpages , and of course , because our participants were from the U.S. they were not familiar with the candidates .
In fact , that ’ s why , before they do the search , we get this almost perfect 50/50 split regarding who they ’ re going to vote for , because they don ’ t know these candidates .
The information they ’ re getting from the search , that , presumably , is why we get a shift.
” Another thing Epstein noticed was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were seeing biased search results .
In other words , the manipulation went virtually undetected .
In a second experiment , they were able to achieve a 63 % shift in voter preference , and by masking the bias — simply by inserting a pro-opponent result here and there — they were able to hide the bias from almost everyone .
“ In other words , we could get enormous shifts in opinions and voting preferences with no one being able to detect the bias in the search results we were showing them @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is where , again , it starts to get scary .
Scarier still is when we moved on to do a national study of more than 2,000 people in all 50 states.
” What this large-scale investigation revealed is that the few who actually notice the bias are not protected from its effects .
Curiously , they actually shift even further toward the bias , rather than away from it .
As evidenced by other studies , the pattern of clicks is a key factor that makes search bias so powerful : 50 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the top two items and 95 % of all clicks go to the first page of search results .
“ In other words , people spend most of their time clicking on and reading content that comes from high-ranking search results .
If those high-ranking search results favor one candidate , that ’ s pretty much all they see and that impacts their opinions and their voting preferences , ” Epstein says .
Subsequent experiments revealed that this click pattern is the result of conditioning .
Most of the things people search for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or the capital of a country .
The most appropriate and correct answer is always at the very top .
This conditions them to assume that the best and truest answer is always the most high-ranked listing .
Google May Have Shifted Millions of Votes in 2016 Elections The ramifications of the search engine manipulation effect can be immense .
Of course , having power to shift public opinion is one thing ; actually using that power is another .
So , Epstein ’ s next target was to determine whether Google is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ Early 2016 , I set up the first-ever monitoring system , which allowed me to look over the shoulders of people as they were conducting election-related searches on Google , Bing and Yahoo in the months leading up to the 2016 presidential election .
I had 95 field agents ( as we call them ) , in 24 states .
We kept their identities secret , which took a lot of work .
And this is exactly , by the way , what the Nielsen company does to generate ratings for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ families .
Their identities are secret .
They equip the families with special boxes , which allow Nielsen to tabulate what programs they ’ re watching … Inspired by the Nielsen model , we recruited our field agents , we equipped them with custom passive software .
In other words , no one could detect the fact that they have the software in their computers .
But that software allowed us to look over their shoulders as they conducted election related searches … We ended up preserving 13,207 election-related searches and the nearly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ linked … After the election , we rated the webpages for bias , either pro-Clinton or pro-Trump … and then we did an analysis to see whether there was any bias in the search results people were seeing .
The results we got were crystal clear , highly significant statistically … at the 0.001 level .
What that says is we can be confident the bias we were seeing was real , and it didn ’ t occur because of some random factors .
We found a pro-Clinton bias in all 10 search @ @ @ @ @ @ @ search results , but not on Bing or Yahoo .
That ’ s very important .
So , there was a significant pro-Clinton bias on Google .
Because of the experiments I had been doing since 2013 , I was also able to calculate how many votes could have been shifted with that level of bias… At bare minimum , about 2.6 million [ undecided ] votes would have shifted to Hillary Clinton.
” On the high end , Google ’ s biased search results may have shifted as many as 10.4 million @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no small feat — all without anyone realizing they ’ d been influenced , and without leaving a trace for the authorities to follow .
According to Epstein ’ s calculations , tech companies , Google being the main one , can shift 15 million votes leading up to the 2020 election , which means they have the potential to select the next president of United States .
Google Has the Power to Determine 25 % of Global Elections Many who look at Epstein ’ s work end up focusing on Google ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but the problem is much bigger than that .
“ As I explained when I testified before Congress , the reason why I ’ m speaking out about these issues is because , first of all , I … think it ’ s important that we preserve democracy and preserve the free and fair election .
To me , it ’ s pretty straight forward .
But the problem is much bigger than elections or democracy or the United States .
Because I calculated back in 2015 that … Google ’ s search @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of searches worldwide are conducted on Google — was determining the outcomes of upwards of 25 % of the national elections in the world .
How can that be ?
Well , it ’ s because a lot of elections are very close .
And that ’ s the key to understanding this .
In other words , we actually looked at the win margins in national elections around the world , which tend to be very close .
In that 2010 Australian election , for example , the win margin was something @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they ’ re getting on Google are biased toward one candidate , that shifts a lot of votes among undecided people .
And it ’ s very , very simple for them to flip an election or … rig an election … It ’ s very , very simple for Google to do that .
They can do it deliberately , which is kind of scary .
In other words , some top executives at Google could decide who they want to win an election in South Africa or the U.K. or anywhere @ @ @ @ @ @ @ employee at Google who does it .
You may think that ’ s impossible … [ but ] it ’ s incredibly simple … [ A ] senior software engineer at Google , Shumeet Baluja , who ’ s been at Google almost since the very beginning , published a novel that no one ’ s ever heard of called ‘ The Silicon Jungle ’ … It ’ s fictional , but it ’ s about Google , and the power that individual employees at Google have to make or break any company @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a fantastic novel .
I asked Baluja how Google let him get away with publishing it and he said , ‘ Well , they made me promise I would never promote it.
’ That ’ s why no one ’ s ever heard of this book.
” A Dictator Unlike Anything the World Has Ever Known Another , and even more frightening possibility , is that Google could allow its biased algorithm to favor one candidate over another without caring about which candidate is being favored .
“ That ’ s the scariest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because now you ’ ve got an algorithm , a computer program , which is an idiot … deciding who rules us .
It ’ s crazy.
” While this sounds like it should be illegal , it ’ s not , because there are no laws or regulations that restrict or dictate how Google must rank its search results .
Courts have actually concluded that Google is simply exercising its right to free speech , even if that means destroying the businesses they demote in their search listings or black listings .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ this kind of hidden influence is by setting up monitoring programs such as Epstein ’ s all over the world .
“ As a species , it ’ s the only way we can protect ourselves from new types of online technologies that can be used to influence us , ” he says .
“ No dictator anywhere has ever had even a tiny fraction of the power that this company has.
” Epstein is also pushing for government to make the Google search index a public commons , which would allow other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Google ’ s database .
While Google ’ s search engine can not be broken up , its monopoly would be thwarted by forcing it to hand over its index to other search platform developers .
In 2016 , Epstein also discovered the remarkable influence of search suggestions — the suggested searches shown in a drop-down menu when you begin to type a search term .
This effect is now known as the search suggestion effect or SSE .
Epstein explains : “ Initially the idea was they were going to save you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they presented this new feature .
They were going to anticipate , based on your history , or based on what other people are searching for , what it is you ’ re looking for so you don ’ t have to type the whole thing .
Just click on one of the suggestions .
But then it changed into something else .
It changed into a tool for manipulation .
In June 2016 , a small news organization … discovered that it was virtually impossible to get negative search suggestions related to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them for other people including Donald Trump .
They were very concerned about this because maybe that could influence people somehow .
So , I tried this myself , and I have a wonderful image that I preserved showing this .
I typed in ‘ Hillary Clinton is ’ on Bing and on Yahoo , and I got those long lists , eight and 10 items , saying , ‘ Hillary Clinton is the devil .
Hillary Clinton is sick ’ … all negative things that people were actually searching for .
How @ @ @ @ @ @ @ checked Google trends .
Google trends shows you what people are actually searching for .
Sure enough , people were actually searching for all these negative things related to Hillary Clinton .
Those [ were ] the most popular search terms .
So , we tried it on Google and we got , ‘ Hillary Clinton is winning , Hillary Clinton is awesome.
’ Now you check those phrases on Google trends and you find no one is searching for ‘ Hillary Clinton is awesome.
’ Nobody .
Not one .
But that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you in their search suggestions .
That again got my research gears running .
I started doing experiments because I said , ‘ Wait a minute , why would they do this ?
What is the point ?
’ Here ’ s what I found in a series of experiments : Just by manipulating search suggestions , I could turn a 50/50 split among undecided voters into a 90/10 split — with no one having the slightest idea that they ’ ve been manipulated.
” YouTube , which is owned by Google , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
According to Epstein , 70 % of the videos people view on YouTube are suggested by Google ’ s top secret Up Next algorithm , which recommends videos for you to view whenever you ’ re watching a video .
Just like the search suggestions , this is a phenomenally effective ephemeral manipulation tool .
There ’ s no record of the videos recommended by the algorithm , yet it can take you down the proverbial rabbit hole by feeding you one video after another .
“ There are documented cases now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ extreme Islam or to white supremacy , literally because they ’ d been pulled down a rabbit hole by a sequence of videos on YouTube , ” Epstein says .
“ Think of that power .
Again , it ’ s not powerful for people who already have strong opinions .
It ’ s powerful for the people who don ’ t , the people who are vulnerable , the people who are undecided or uncommitted .
And that ’ s a lot of people.
” Most people now have Amazon Prime .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ do , you can watch the following documentary for free on Prime .
It is well worth your time to do so .
Epstein and many other experts provide a very compelling overview of the dangers that we discuss in our interview .
In my view , this is a must-watch and one to recommend to your friends and family .
A question Epstein raises is , “ Who gave this private company , which is not accountable to any of us , the ability to determine what billions of people around the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
” That is perhaps one of the biggest issues .
Epstein and others attempt to answer this question in this documentary , “ The Creepy Line , ” which is a direct quote from Google ’ s executive chairman Eric Schmidt .
“ Traditional media have very serious constraints placed on them , but Google , which is far more penetrating and far more effective at influencing people , has none of these constraints , ” Epstein says .
“ There are lots of good people in [ ‘ The Creepy Line @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and it explains my research very clearly , which is wonderful .
It explains my research better than I explain my research .
“ ‘ The Creepy Line ’ is available on iTunes and on Amazon .
I think it costs $ 3 or $ 4 to watch … If you ’ re an Amazon Prime Member it ’ s free .
It ’ s an excellent film.
” In his article2 “ Seven Simple Steps Toward Online Privacy , ” Epstein outlines his recommendations for protecting your privacy while surfing the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t cost anything .
You can access the article at : MySevenSimpleSteps.com “ My first sentence is ‘ I have not received a targeted ad on my computer or mobile phone since 2014.
’ Most people are shocked by that because they ’ re bombarded with targeted ads constantly .
More and more people are telling me that they ’ re just having a conversation with someone , so they ’ re not even doing anything online per se , but their phone is nearby — or they ’ re having a conversation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Alexa or Google Home , these personal assistants — and the next thing they know they start getting targeted ads related to what they were talking about .
This is the surveillance problem … The point is that there are ways to use the internet , tablets and mobile phones , to preserve or protect your privacy , but almost no one does that .
So , the fact is that we ’ re now being surveilled 24/7 , generally speaking , with no awareness that we ’ re even being surveilled .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ they do searches on Google the search history is preserved forever … But it goes so far beyond that because now we ’ re being surveilled through personal assistants , so that when we speak , we ’ re being [ surveilled ] .
It goes even beyond that , because a few years ago Google bought the Nest company , which makes a smart thermostat .
After they bought the company , they put microphones into the smart thermostats , and the latest versions of the smart thermostats have microphones and cameras @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recent years , which give them , basically , ownership rights over ways of analyzing sounds that are picked up by microphones in people ’ s homes .
They can hook you up with dentists , they can hook you up with sex therapists , with mental health services , relationship coaches , et cetera .
Location tracking has also gotten completely out of hand .
We ’ ve learned in recent months that even when you disable location tracking … on your mobile phone , you ’ re still being tracked.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ strongly recommend that you use a VPN on your cellphone and computer , as this will prevent virtually anyone from tracking and targeting you .
There are many out there but I am using the one Epstein recommends , Nord VPN , which is only about $ 3 per month and you can use it on up to six devices .
In my view , this is a must if you seek to preserve your privacy .
How Google Tracks You Even When You ’ re Offline You can learn a lot about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whereabouts .
Most of us are very naïve about these things .
As explained by Epstein , location tracking technology has become incredibly sophisticated and aggressive .
Android cellphones , for example , which are a Google-owned operating system , can track you even when you ’ re not connected to the internet , whether you have geo tracking enabled or not .
“ It just gets creepier and creepier , ” Epstein says .
“ Let ’ s say you pull out your SIM card .
Let ’ s say you disconnect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you ’ re absolutely isolated .
“ You ’ re not connected to the internet .
Guess what ?
Your phone is still tracking everything you do on that phone and it ’ s still tracking your location.
” As soon as you reconnect to the internet , all that information stored in your phone is sent to Google .
So , even though you may think you ’ ve just spent the day incognito , the moment you reconnect , every step you ’ ve made is shared ( provided you had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ terms of online tracking , it ’ s also important to realize that Google is tracking your movements online even if you ’ re not using their products , because most websites use Google Analytics , which tracks everything you do on that website .
And , you have no way of knowing whether a website uses Google Analytics or not .
To protect your privacy , Epstein recommends taking the following steps , seven of which are outlined in “ Seven Simple Steps Toward Online Privacy.
” The last one , Fitbit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Use a virtual private network ( VPN ) such as Nord , which is only about $ 3 per month and can be used on up to six devices .
In my view , this is a must if you seek to preserve your privacy .
“ When you use your mobile phone , laptop or desktop in the usual way , your identity is very easy for Google and other companies to see .
They can see it via your IP address , but more and more , there are much more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s you .
One is called browser fingerprinting .
This is something that is so disturbing .
Basically , the kind of browser you have and the way you use your browser is like a fingerprint .
You use your browser in a unique way , and just by the way you type , these companies now can instantly identify you .
Brave has some protection against a browser fingerprinting , but you really need to be using a VPN .
What a VPN does is it routes whatever you ’ re @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It can be anywhere in the world , and there are hundreds of companies offering VPN services .
The one I like the best right now is called Nord VPN .
You download the software , install it , just like you install any software .
It ’ s incredibly easy to use .
You do not have to be a techie to use Nord , and it shows you a map of the world and you basically just click on a country .
The VPN basically makes it appear as though @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It basically creates a kind of fake identity for you , and that ’ s a good thing .
Now , very often I will go through Nord ’ s computers in the United States .
Sometimes you have to do that , or you can ’ t get certain things done .
PayPal doesn ’ t like you to be in a foreign country for example.
” Nord , when used on your cellphone , will also mask your identity when using apps like Google Maps .
Do not use Gmail , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stored .
It becomes part of your profile and is used to build digital models of you , which allows them to make predictions about your line of thinking and every want and desire .
Many other older email systems such as AOL and Yahoo are also being used as surveillance platforms in the same way as Gmail .
ProtonMail.com , which uses end-to-end encryption , is a great alternative and the basic account is free .
Don ’ t use Google ’ s Chrome browser , as everything you do on there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ web page you ’ ve ever visited .
Brave is a great alternative that takes privacy seriously .
Brave is also faster than Chrome , and suppresses ads [ please activate ads in your browser in order to support independent content creators ] .
It ’ s based on Chromium , the same software infrastructure that Chrome is based on , so you can easily transfer your extensions , favorites and bookmarks .
Don ’ t use Google as your search engine , or any extension of Google , such as Bing or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ results from Google .
The same goes for the iPhone ’ s personal assistant Siri , which draws all of its answers from Google .
He recommends avoiding StartPage , as it was recently bought by an aggressive online marketing company , which , like Google , depends on surveillance .
Don ’ t use an Android cellphone , for all the reasons discussed earlier .
Epstein uses a Blackberry , which is more secure than Android phones or the iPhone .
Blackberry ’ s upcoming model , the Key3 , will be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the world , he says .
Don ’ t use Google Home devices in your house or apartment .
These devices record everything that occurs in your home , both speech and sounds such as brushing your teeth and boiling water , even when they appear to be inactive , and send that information back to Google .
Android phones are also always listening and recording , as are Google ’ s home thermostat Nest , and Amazon ’ s Alexa .
Clear your cache and cookies .
As Epstein explains in his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sorts are constantly installing invasive computer code on your computers and mobile devices , mainly to keep an eye on you but sometimes for more nefarious purposes .
On a mobile device , you can clear out most of this garbage by going to the settings menu of your browser , selecting the ‘ privacy and security ’ option and then clicking on the icon that clears your cache and cookies .
With most laptop and desktop browsers , holding down three keys simultaneously — CTRL , SHIFT and DEL — takes you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ use this technique multiple times a day without even thinking about it .
You can also configure the Brave and Firefox browsers to erase your cache and cookies automatically every time you close your browser.
” Don ’ t use Fitbit , as it was recently purchased by Google and will provide them with all your physiological information and activity levels , in addition to everything else that Google already has on you .
From the author : The existing medical establishment is responsible for killing and permanently injuring millions of Americans , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mercola.com since I began the site in 1997 – we are now routinely among the top 10 health sites on the Internet – convinces me that you , too , are fed up with their deception .
You want practical health solutions without the hype , and that ’ s what I offer .

Robert Epstein, who received his Ph.D. in psychology from Harvard in 1981 and served as the former editor in chief at Psychology Today, is now a senior research psychologist for the American Institute of Behavioral Research and Technology, where for the last decade he has helped expose Google’s manipulative and deceptive practices.
He explains what got him interested in investigating the internet search monopoly in the first place:
“In 2012, January 1st, I received some emails from Google saying my website contained malware and that they were somehow blocking access. This means I had gotten onto one of Google’s blacklists.
My website did contain some malware. It was pretty easy to get rid of, but it turns out it’s hard to get off of a Google blacklist. That’s a big problem. I started looking at Google just a little bit differently.
I wondered, first of all, why they were notifying me about this rather than some government agency or some nonprofit organization? Why was a private company notifying me?
In other words, who made Google sheriff of the internet?
Second, I learned they had no customer service department, which seemed very strange, so if you have a problem with Google, then you have a problem because they don’t help you solve the problem.
I learned also that although you can get onto a blacklist in a split second, it can take weeks to get off a blacklist.
There have been businesses that have gotten onto their blacklists and have gone out of business while they’re trying to straighten out the problem.
The thing that really caught my eye — because I’ve been a programmer my whole life — was I couldn’t figure out how they were blocking access to my website, not just through their own products …
Google.com, the search engine, or through Chrome, which is their browser, but through Safari, which is an Apple product, through Firefox, which is a browser run by Mozilla, a nonprofit organization.
How was Google blocking access through so many different means?
The point is I just started to get more curious about the company, and later in 2012, I happened to be looking at a growing literature, which was about the power of search rankings to impact sales.
This was in the marketing field and it just was astonishing.
In other words, if you could push yourself up one more notch in their search results, that could make the difference between success or failure for your company; it could mean a lot more income.
It turns out that this initial research was saying that people really trust those higher ranked search results.
I simply asked a question. I wondered whether, if people trust those higher rank search results, I could use search results to influence people’s opinions, maybe even their votes.”
What Epstein discovered through his subsequent research, which began in 2013, is that yes, biased search results can indeed be used to influence public opinion and sway undecided voters.
What’s more, the strength of that influence was shocking.
He also eventually discovered how Google is able to block website access on browsers other than their own. His findings were published in 2016 in U.S. News & World Report.1
Google’s Powers Pose Serious Threats to Society
Google’s powers pose three specific threats to society:
1. They’re a surveillance agency with significant yet hidden surveillance powers.
As noted by Epstein:
“The search engine … Google Wallet, Google Docs, Google Drive, YouTube, these are surveillance platforms.
In other words, from their perspective, the value these tools have is they give them more information about you. Surveillance is what they do.”
2. They’re a censoring agency with the ability to restrict or block access to websites across the internet, thus deciding what people can and cannot see. They even have the ability to block access to entire countries and the internet as a whole.
The most crushing problem with this kind of internet censorship is that you don’t know what you don’t know.
If a certain type of information is removed from search, and you don’t know it should exist somewhere, you’ll never go looking for it.
And, when searching for information online, how would you know that certain websites or pages have been removed from the search results in the first place? The answer is, you don’t.
For example, Google has been investing in DNA repositories for quite a long time, and are adding DNA information to our profiles.
According to Epstein, Google has taken over the national DNA repository, but articles about that — which he has cited in his own writings — have all vanished.
3. They have the power to manipulate public opinion through search rankings and other means.
“To me, that’s the scariest area,” Epstein says, “because Google is shaping the opinions, thinking, beliefs, attitudes, purchases and votes of billions of people around the world without anyone knowing that they’re doing so … and perhaps even more shocking, without leaving a paper trail for authorities to trace.
They’re using new techniques of manipulation that have never existed before in human history and they are for the most part, subliminal … but they don’t produce tiny shifts.
They produce enormous shifts in people’s thinking, very rapidly.
Some of the techniques I’ve discovered are among the largest behavioral effects ever discovered in the behavioral sciences.”
While surveillance is Google’s primary business, their revenue — which exceeds $130 billion a year — comes almost exclusively from advertising.
All that personal information you’ve provided them through their various products is sold to advertisers looking for a specific target audience.
How Google Can Shift Your Perception Without Your Knowledge
Epstein’s controlled, randomized, double-blind and counterbalanced experiments have revealed a number of different ways in which Google can shift public perception.
The first effect he discovered is called SEME, which stands for search engine manipulation effect. For a full description of the basic experiment used to identify this effect, please listen to the interview.
In summary, the aim of his experiment was to see whether search results biased toward a particular political candidate would be capable of shifting users’ political opinion and leanings.
“I had predicted, when we first did this, that we would get a shift,” Epstein says, “because … people do trust higher ranked search results, and of course we had biased the search results so that, if in that first group, someone was clicking on a high-ranking search result, that would connect them to a webpage which made one candidate look much better than the other …
I predicted we could get a shift in voting preferences of 2% to 3%. I was way off. We got … a shift of 48%, which I thought must be an error because that’s crazy …
I should note that in almost all of our experiments, especially those early ones, we deliberately used undecided voters.
That’s the key. You can’t easily push the opinions or voting preferences of people who are partisan, who are strongly committed to one party or another, but people who are undecided, those are the people who are very vulnerable.
In our experiments, we always find a way to use undecided voters.
In these early experiments, the way we guaranteed that our voters were undecided was by using people from the U.S. as our participants, but the election we chose was the 2010 election for the prime minister of Australia.
They’re real candidates, a real election, real search results, real webpages, and of course, because our participants were from the U.S. they were not familiar with the candidates.
In fact, that’s why, before they do the search, we get this almost perfect 50/50 split regarding who they’re going to vote for, because they don’t know these candidates.
The information they’re getting from the search, that, presumably, is why we get a shift.”
Simple Trick Effectively Masks Search Bias
Another thing Epstein noticed was that very few seemed to realize they were seeing biased search results.
In other words, the manipulation went virtually undetected.
In a second experiment, they were able to achieve a 63% shift in voter preference, and by masking the bias — simply by inserting a pro-opponent result here and there — they were able to hide the bias from almost everyone.
“In other words, we could get enormous shifts in opinions and voting preferences with no one being able to detect the bias in the search results we were showing them,” Epstein says.
“This is where, again, it starts to get scary. Scarier still is when we moved on to do a national study of more than 2,000 people in all 50 states.”
What this large-scale investigation revealed is that the few who actually notice the bias are not protected from its effects.
Curiously, they actually shift even further toward the bias, rather than away from it.
As evidenced by other studies, the pattern of clicks is a key factor that makes search bias so powerful: 50% of all search selections go to the top two items and 95% of all clicks go to the first page of search results.
“In other words, people spend most of their time clicking on and reading content that comes from high-ranking search results.
If those high-ranking search results favor one candidate, that’s pretty much all they see and that impacts their opinions and their voting preferences,” Epstein says.
Subsequent experiments revealed that this click pattern is the result of conditioning. Most of the things people search for are simple matters such as local weather or the capital of a country.
The most appropriate and correct answer is always at the very top. This conditions them to assume that the best and truest answer is always the most high-ranked listing.
Google May Have Shifted Millions of Votes in 2016 Elections
The ramifications of the search engine manipulation effect can be immense. Of course, having power to shift public opinion is one thing; actually using that power is another.
So, Epstein’s next target was to determine whether Google is using its power of influence or not.
“Early 2016, I set up the first-ever monitoring system, which allowed me to look over the shoulders of people as they were conducting election-related searches on Google, Bing and Yahoo in the months leading up to the 2016 presidential election. I had 95 field agents (as we call them), in 24 states.
We kept their identities secret, which took a lot of work. And this is exactly, by the way, what the Nielsen company does to generate ratings for television shows.
They have several thousand families. Their identities are secret. They equip the families with special boxes, which allow Nielsen to tabulate what programs they’re watching …
Inspired by the Nielsen model, we recruited our field agents, we equipped them with custom passive software.
In other words, no one could detect the fact that they have the software in their computers. But that software allowed us to look over their shoulders as they conducted election related searches …
We ended up preserving 13,207 election-related searches and the nearly 100,000 webpages to which the search results linked …
After the election, we rated the webpages for bias, either pro-Clinton or pro-Trump … and then we did an analysis to see whether there was any bias in the search results people were seeing.
The results we got were crystal clear, highly significant statistically … at the 0.001 level.
What that says is we can be confident the bias we were seeing was real, and it didn’t occur because of some random factors.
We found a pro-Clinton bias in all 10 search positions on the first page of Google search results, but not on Bing or Yahoo.
That’s very important. So, there was a significant pro-Clinton bias on Google. Because of the experiments I had been doing since 2013, I was also able to calculate how many votes could have been shifted with that level of bias…
At bare minimum, about 2.6 million [undecided] votes would have shifted to Hillary Clinton.”
On the high end, Google’s biased search results may have shifted as many as 10.4 million undecided voters toward Clinton, which is no small feat — all without anyone realizing they’d been influenced, and without leaving a trace for the authorities to follow.
According to Epstein’s calculations, tech companies, Google being the main one, can shift 15 million votes leading up to the 2020 election, which means they have the potential to select the next president of United States.
Google Has the Power to Determine 25% of Global Elections
Many who look at Epstein’s work end up focusing on Google’s ability to influence U.S. politics, but the problem is much bigger than that.
“As I explained when I testified before Congress, the reason why I’m speaking out about these issues is because, first of all, I … think it’s important that we preserve democracy and preserve the free and fair election. To me, it’s pretty straight forward.
But the problem is much bigger than elections or democracy or the United States. Because I calculated back in 2015 that …
Google’s search engine — because more than 90% of searches worldwide are conducted on Google — was determining the outcomes of upwards of 25% of the national elections in the world.
How can that be? Well, it’s because a lot of elections are very close. And that’s the key to understanding this.
In other words, we actually looked at the win margins in national elections around the world, which tend to be very close.
In that 2010 Australian election, for example, the win margin was something like 0.2% …
If the results they’re getting on Google are biased toward one candidate, that shifts a lot of votes among undecided people.
And it’s very, very simple for them to flip an election or … rig an election … It’s very, very simple for Google to do that.
They can do it deliberately, which is kind of scary. In other words, some top executives at Google could decide who they want to win an election in South Africa or the U.K. or anywhere.
It could be just a rogue employee at Google who does it. You may think that’s impossible … [but] it’s incredibly simple …
[A] senior software engineer at Google, Shumeet Baluja, who’s been at Google almost since the very beginning, published a novel that no one’s ever heard of called ‘The Silicon Jungle’ …
It’s fictional, but it’s about Google, and the power that individual employees at Google have to make or break any company or any individual.
It’s a fantastic novel. I asked Baluja how Google let him get away with publishing it and he said, ‘Well, they made me promise I would never promote it.’ That’s why no one’s ever heard of this book.”
A Dictator Unlike Anything the World Has Ever Known
Another, and even more frightening possibility, is that Google could allow its biased algorithm to favor one candidate over another without caring about which candidate is being favored.
“That’s the scariest possibility,” Epstein says, “because now you’ve got an algorithm, a computer program, which is an idiot … deciding who rules us. It’s crazy.”
While this sounds like it should be illegal, it’s not, because there are no laws or regulations that restrict or dictate how Google must rank its search results.
Courts have actually concluded that Google is simply exercising its right to free speech, even if that means destroying the businesses they demote in their search listings or black listings.
The only way to protect ourselves from this kind of hidden influence is by setting up monitoring programs such as Epstein’s all over the world.
“As a species, it’s the only way we can protect ourselves from new types of online technologies that can be used to influence us,” he says.
“No dictator anywhere has ever had even a tiny fraction of the power that this company has.”
Epstein is also pushing for government to make the Google search index a public commons, which would allow other companies to create competing search platforms using Google’s database.
While Google’s search engine cannot be broken up, its monopoly would be thwarted by forcing it to hand over its index to other search platform developers.
The Influence of Search Suggestions
In 2016, Epstein also discovered the remarkable influence of search suggestions — the suggested searches shown in a drop-down menu when you begin to type a search term.
This effect is now known as the search suggestion effect or SSE. Epstein explains:
“Initially the idea was they were going to save you time. That’s the way they presented this new feature.
They were going to anticipate, based on your history, or based on what other people are searching for, what it is you’re looking for so you don’t have to type the whole thing.
Just click on one of the suggestions. But then it changed into something else. It changed into a tool for manipulation.
In June 2016, a small news organization … discovered that it was virtually impossible to get negative search suggestions related to Hillary Clinton, but easy to get them for other people including Donald Trump.
They were very concerned about this because maybe that could influence people somehow.
So, I tried this myself, and I have a wonderful image that I preserved showing this.
I typed in ‘Hillary Clinton is’ on Bing and on Yahoo, and I got those long lists, eight and 10 items, saying, ‘Hillary Clinton is the devil. Hillary Clinton is sick’ … all negative things that people were actually searching for.
How do I know that? Because we checked Google trends. Google trends shows you what people are actually searching for.
Sure enough, people were actually searching for all these negative things related to Hillary Clinton. Those [were] the most popular search terms.
So, we tried it on Google and we got, ‘Hillary Clinton is winning, Hillary Clinton is awesome.’
Now you check those phrases on Google trends and you find no one is searching for ‘Hillary Clinton is awesome.’ Nobody. Not one. But that’s what they’re showing you in their search suggestions.
That again got my research gears running. I started doing experiments because I said, ‘Wait a minute, why would they do this? What is the point?’
Here’s what I found in a series of experiments: Just by manipulating search suggestions, I could turn a 50/50 split among undecided voters into a 90/10 split — with no one having the slightest idea that they’ve been manipulated.”
YouTube’s Up Next Algorithm
YouTube, which is owned by Google, also has enormous influence on public opinion. According to Epstein, 70% of the videos people view on YouTube are suggested by Google’s top secret Up Next algorithm, which recommends videos for you to view whenever you’re watching a video.
Just like the search suggestions, this is a phenomenally effective ephemeral manipulation tool.
There’s no record of the videos recommended by the algorithm, yet it can take you down the proverbial rabbit hole by feeding you one video after another.
“There are documented cases now in which people have been converted to extreme Islam or to white supremacy, literally because they’d been pulled down a rabbit hole by a sequence of videos on YouTube,” Epstein says.
“Think of that power. Again, it’s not powerful for people who already have strong opinions. It’s powerful for the people who don’t, the people who are vulnerable, the people who are undecided or uncommitted. And that’s a lot of people.”
The Creepy Line
Most people now have Amazon Prime. If you are one of those who do, you can watch the following documentary for free on Prime.
It is well worth your time to do so. Epstein and many other experts provide a very compelling overview of the dangers that we discuss in our interview.
In my view, this is a must-watch and one to recommend to your friends and family.
A question Epstein raises is, “Who gave this private company, which is not accountable to any of us, the ability to determine what billions of people around the world will see or will not see?”
That is perhaps one of the biggest issues. Epstein and others attempt to answer this question in this documentary, “The Creepy Line,” which is a direct quote from Google’s executive chairman Eric Schmidt.
“Traditional media have very serious constraints placed on them, but Google, which is far more penetrating and far more effective at influencing people, has none of these constraints,” Epstein says.
“There are lots of good people in [‘The Creepy Line‘], lots of good data, and it explains my research very clearly, which is wonderful. It explains my research better than I explain my research.
“‘The Creepy Line’ is available on iTunes and on Amazon. I think it costs $3 or $4 to watch … If you’re an Amazon Prime Member it’s free. It’s an excellent film.”
Google Runs a Total Surveillance State
In his article2 “Seven Simple Steps Toward Online Privacy,” Epstein outlines his recommendations for protecting your privacy while surfing the web, most of which don’t cost anything. You can access the article at: MySevenSimpleSteps.com
“My first sentence is ‘I have not received a targeted ad on my computer or mobile phone since 2014.’ Most people are shocked by that because they’re bombarded with targeted ads constantly.
More and more people are telling me that they’re just having a conversation with someone, so they’re not even doing anything online per se, but their phone is nearby — or they’re having a conversation in their home and they have Amazon Alexa or Google Home, these personal assistants — and the next thing they know they start getting targeted ads related to what they were talking about.
This is the surveillance problem … The point is that there are ways to use the internet, tablets and mobile phones, to preserve or protect your privacy, but almost no one does that.
So, the fact is that we’re now being surveilled 24/7, generally speaking, with no awareness that we’re even being surveilled.
Maybe some people are aware that when they do searches on Google the search history is preserved forever …
But it goes so far beyond that because now we’re being surveilled through personal assistants, so that when we speak, we’re being [surveilled].
It goes even beyond that, because a few years ago Google bought the Nest company, which makes a smart thermostat.
After they bought the company, they put microphones into the smart thermostats, and the latest versions of the smart thermostats have microphones and cameras.
Google has been issued patents in recent years, which give them, basically, ownership rights over ways of analyzing sounds that are picked up by microphones in people’s homes.
They can hook you up with dentists, they can hook you up with sex therapists, with mental health services, relationship coaches, et cetera.
So, there’s that.
Location tracking has also gotten completely out of hand. We’ve learned in recent months that even when you disable location tracking … on your mobile phone, you’re still being tracked.”
This is one of the reasons I strongly recommend that you use a VPN on your cellphone and computer, as this will prevent virtually anyone from tracking and targeting you.
There are many out there but I am using the one Epstein recommends, Nord VPN, which is only about $3 per month and you can use it on up to six devices.
In my view, this is a must if you seek to preserve your privacy.
How Google Tracks You Even When You’re Offline
You can learn a lot about a person by tracking their movements and whereabouts. Most of us are very naïve about these things.
As explained by Epstein, location tracking technology has become incredibly sophisticated and aggressive.
Android cellphones, for example, which are a Google-owned operating system, can track you even when you’re not connected to the internet, whether you have geo tracking enabled or not.
“It just gets creepier and creepier,” Epstein says. “Let’s say you pull out your SIM card. Let’s say you disconnect from your mobile service provider, so you’re absolutely isolated.
“You’re not connected to the internet. Guess what? Your phone is still tracking everything you do on that phone and it’s still tracking your location.”
As soon as you reconnect to the internet, all that information stored in your phone is sent to Google.
So, even though you may think you’ve just spent the day incognito, the moment you reconnect, every step you’ve made is shared (provided you had your phone with you).
In terms of online tracking, it’s also important to realize that Google is tracking your movements online even if you’re not using their products, because most websites use Google Analytics, which tracks everything you do on that website. And, you have no way of knowing whether a website uses Google Analytics or not.
Steps to Protect Your Online Privacy
To protect your privacy, Epstein recommends taking the following steps, seven of which are outlined in “Seven Simple Steps Toward Online Privacy.” The last one, Fitbit, is a more recent concern.
Use a virtual private network (VPN) such as Nord, which is only about $3 per month and can be used on up to six devices. In my view, this is a must if you seek to preserve your privacy.
Epstein explains:
“When you use your mobile phone, laptop or desktop in the usual way, your identity is very easy for Google and other companies to see.
They can see it via your IP address, but more and more, there are much more sophisticated ways now that they know it’s you. One is called browser fingerprinting.
This is something that is so disturbing. Basically, the kind of browser you have and the way you use your browser is like a fingerprint.
You use your browser in a unique way, and just by the way you type, these companies now can instantly identify you.
Brave has some protection against a browser fingerprinting, but you really need to be using a VPN. What a VPN does is it routes whatever you’re doing through some other computer somewhere else.
It can be anywhere in the world, and there are hundreds of companies offering VPN services. The one I like the best right now is called Nord VPN.
You download the software, install it, just like you install any software. It’s incredibly easy to use.
You do not have to be a techie to use Nord, and it shows you a map of the world and you basically just click on a country.
The VPN basically makes it appear as though your computer is not your computer. It basically creates a kind of fake identity for you, and that’s a good thing.
Now, very often I will go through Nord’s computers in the United States. Sometimes you have to do that, or you can’t get certain things done.
PayPal doesn’t like you to be in a foreign country for example.”
Nord, when used on your cellphone, will also mask your identity when using apps like Google Maps.
Do not use Gmail, as every email you write is permanently stored. It becomes part of your profile and is used to build digital models of you, which allows them to make predictions about your line of thinking and every want and desire.
Many other older email systems such as AOL and Yahoo are also being used as surveillance platforms in the same way as Gmail.
ProtonMail.com, which uses end-to-end encryption, is a great alternative and the basic account is free.
Don’t use Google’s Chrome browser, as everything you do on there is surveilled, including keystrokes and every web page you’ve ever visited. Brave is a great alternative that takes privacy seriously.
Brave is also faster than Chrome, and suppresses ads [please activate ads in your browser in order to support independent content creators]. It’s based on Chromium, the same software infrastructure that Chrome is based on, so you can easily transfer your extensions, favorites and bookmarks.
Don’t use Google as your search engine, or any extension of Google, such as Bing or Yahoo, both of which draw search results from Google.
The same goes for the iPhone’s personal assistant Siri, which draws all of its answers from Google.
Alternative search engines suggested by Epstein include SwissCows and Qwant.
He recommends avoiding StartPage, as it was recently bought by an aggressive online marketing company, which, like Google, depends on surveillance.
Don’t use an Android cellphone, for all the reasons discussed earlier. Epstein uses a Blackberry, which is more secure than Android phones or the iPhone.
Blackberry’s upcoming model, the Key3, will be one of the most secure cellphones in the world, he says.
Don’t use Google Home devices in your house or apartment.
These devices record everything that occurs in your home, both speech and sounds such as brushing your teeth and boiling water, even when they appear to be inactive, and send that information back to Google.
Android phones are also always listening and recording, as are Google’s home thermostat Nest, and Amazon’s Alexa.
Clear your cache and cookies. As Epstein explains in his article:3
“Companies and hackers of all sorts are constantly installing invasive computer code on your computers and mobile devices, mainly to keep an eye on you but sometimes for more nefarious purposes.
On a mobile device, you can clear out most of this garbage by going to the settings menu of your browser, selecting the ‘privacy and security’ option and then clicking on the icon that clears your cache and cookies.
With most laptop and desktop browsers, holding down three keys simultaneously — CTRL, SHIFT and DEL — takes you directly to the relevant menu; I use this technique multiple times a day without even thinking about it.
You can also configure the Brave and Firefox browsers to erase your cache and cookies automatically every time you close your browser.”
Don’t use Fitbit, as it was recently purchased by Google and will provide them with all your physiological information and activity levels, in addition to everything else that Google already has on you.
By Dr Joseph Mercola
From the author: The existing medical establishment is responsible for killing and permanently injuring millions of Americans, but the surging numbers of visitors to Mercola.com since I began the site in 1997 – we are now routinely among the top 10 health sites on the Internet – convinces me that you, too, are fed up with their deception. You want practical health solutions without the hype, and that’s what I offer.
Sources and References:


humansarefree--2020-05-13--The Mysterious Illuminati Lineage of Elon Musk

I was sent a handwritten letter from someone who said she was a Christian , and had contact with Elon Musk and his mother Maye Musk many years ago .
The author of the letter claimed that Elon was a “ child of the Illuminati ” being bred to be a world leader who can present the Mark of the Beast .
While such ideas are not completely ridiculous or out of line , especially on this channel , it was worth digging into some of what was claimed in the letter .
To my surprise , I was able @ @ @ @ @ @ @ grandfather , Joshua Haldeman , was in fact part of the Canadian Technocracy movement in the 1930 ’ s to the point of being brought to trial after Technocracy was banned .
While many others did not get arrested , Elon ’ s grandfather “ wasn ’ t so lucky.
” But he was let go with all charges dropped , which in hindsight , breeds all kinds of suspicion .
Later that decade , he fathered Maye and Kaye ( twins ) in 1948 after marrying his second wife ( he had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ then take his family ( including Maye ) on expeditions to the Kalahari desert of South Africa , searching for a lost civilization that many revisionist and alt .
historians consider part of the ancient city of Atlantis .
The other part of the handwritten letter claimed that Maye was into African witchcraft , which is plausible given she moved to South Africa ( age 2-3 ) and lived there for many years of her youth .
The mention of Maye ’ s connection to Charles Manson and the Manson crime family [ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ To CIA ’ s MK Ultra Mind Control And Hollywood Child Trafficking ] in the letter is something I was unable to verify with my short and limited research for this video .
It is interesting to note however , that there are literally no results on Google , Bing , Startpage and the rest , that actually contains the keyphrases “ Maye Musk ” or “ Maye Haldeman ” and “ Charles Manson.
” This could mean that there really is nothing there , or , it might be a purposeful “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can be found on the topic online .
The letter goes on to state that Kaye Haldeman not only visited Charles Manson at one point in prison , becoming popular with the crime family by providing TV ’ s and other luxuries , but that she also conceived Elon ’ s sister Tosca at some point during her visits as well .
These claims are impossible for me to verify .
One thing that CAN be verified if someone can dig it up , is the claim that Maye is actually in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
But again , this was a little bit outside of my resources for this video .
Finally , the letter claimed that Elon was “ into darkness ” and that he even levitated !
Again , these are claims that I can not verify .
It ’ s hard for me to believe anyone can actually levitate , but perhaps if he truly is assisted by dark spiritual beings , anything is possible , at least illusory .
No matter what the agenda behind Elon Musk and his technocratic family , we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ already defeated death , and promised us the eternal life that the elite men who run the world seek , simply for repenting and believing in Him !
Mark of the beast or not , we can know the truth will set us free .

I was sent a handwritten letter from someone who said she was a Christian, and had contact with Elon Musk and his mother Maye Musk many years ago.
The author of the letter claimed that Elon was a “child of the Illuminati” being bred to be a world leader who can present the Mark of the Beast.
While such ideas are not completely ridiculous or out of line, especially on this channel, it was worth digging into some of what was claimed in the letter.
To my surprise, I was able to verify that Elon Musk’s grandfather, Joshua Haldeman, was in fact part of the Canadian Technocracy movement in the 1930’s to the point of being brought to trial after Technocracy was banned.
While many others did not get arrested, Elon’s grandfather “wasn’t so lucky.” But he was let go with all charges dropped, which in hindsight, breeds all kinds of suspicion.
Later that decade, he fathered Maye and Kaye (twins) in 1948 after marrying his second wife (he had 5 total children).
He would then take his family (including Maye) on expeditions to the Kalahari desert of South Africa, searching for a lost civilization that many revisionist and alt. historians consider part of the ancient city of Atlantis.
The other part of the handwritten letter claimed that Maye was into African witchcraft, which is plausible given she moved to South Africa (age 2-3) and lived there for many years of her youth.
The mention of Maye’s connection to Charles Manson and the Manson crime family [Read: Reporter Uncovers Manson Family Connections To CIA’s MK Ultra Mind Control And Hollywood Child Trafficking] in the letter is something I was unable to verify with my short and limited research for this video.
It is interesting to note however, that there are literally no results on Google, Bing, Startpage and the rest, that actually contains the keyphrases “Maye Musk” or “Maye Haldeman” and “Charles Manson.”
This could mean that there really is nothing there, or, it might be a purposeful “white washing” of any information that can be found on the topic online.
The letter goes on to state that Kaye Haldeman not only visited Charles Manson at one point in prison, becoming popular with the crime family by providing TV’s and other luxuries, but that she also conceived Elon’s sister Tosca at some point during her visits as well.
These claims are impossible for me to verify.
One thing that CAN be verified if someone can dig it up, is the claim that Maye is actually in a photo on the original Helter Skelter book. But again, this was a little bit outside of my resources for this video.
Finally, the letter claimed that Elon was “into darkness” and that he even levitated! Again, these are claims that I cannot verify.
It’s hard for me to believe anyone can actually levitate, but perhaps if he truly is assisted by dark spiritual beings, anything is possible, at least illusory.
No matter what the agenda behind Elon Musk and his technocratic family, we can rest easy knowing that Jesus Christ already defeated death, and promised us the eternal life that the elite men who run the world seek, simply for repenting and believing in Him!
Mark of the beast or not, we can know the truth will set us free.
Source: YouTube.com


humansarefree--2020-05-13--An Enzyme Called LUCIFERASE is What Makes Bill Gates Implantable Vaccine Work

Shock As It ’ s Revealed An Enzyme Called Luciferase Is What Makes Bill Gates Implantable Quantum Dot Microneedle Vaccine Delivery System Work Bill Gates is building something that we call the Human Implantable Quantum Dot Microneedle Vaccination Delivery System , and it is composed of multiple things .
I want to draw your attention to one component , the quantum dot microneedles that will deliver the vaccines , and a very , very unique biochemical that makes it all work .
If you ’ re standing up while reading this , you might want to sit down .
Today @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enzyme luciferase ’ which is the chemical that will make the quantum dot vaccination readable through a special mobile device app .
That ’ s right , the enzyme that will light up Bill Gates Human Implantable Quantum Dot Microneedle Vaccination Delivery System is called Luciferase , that ’ s what makes the vaccination readable long after the victim has been injected .
Luciferase .
Bill Gates is building something that we call the Human Implantable Quantum Dot Microneedle Vaccination Delivery System , and it needs an enzyme called Luciferase in order to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ human ’ and it becomes 666 .
With each passing day , it becomes clearer and plainer to those of us who are bible believers that we are living in a very unique time period .
So unique , in fact , that we just might be witnessing the kingdom of Antichrist and the Mark of the Beast system being assembled before our very eyes .
Please note that I use the word ‘ might ’ out of an overabundance of caution when writing articles like these , but when I am @ @ @ @ @ @ @ convinced that is exactly where we are .
100 % .
The wise shall understand .
Ever hear of Luciferase ?
“ And he said , Go thy way , Daniel : for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end .
Many shall be purified , and made white , and tried ; but the wicked shall do wickedly : and none of the wicked shall understand ; but the wise shall understand.
” Daniel 12:9,10 ( KJB ) Over the past few weeks , we have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Gates that is so all-encompassing that it quite nearly beggars belief .
That expression is an Old English term which means something that is so unbelievable that it nearly can not be believed .
The Nazi concentration camps in the Holocaust are a great example of that .
When the films of what went on there came to light it was so astonishing that it was hard to comprehend such a thing could happen .
But happen it did .
And what is happening right now , the Antichrist system , is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ here we are .
Bill Gates is building something that we call the Human Implantable Quantum Dot Microneedle Vaccination Delivery System , and it is composed of multiple things .
At its center we have the COVID-19 vaccination that he wants to give every human on earth , there will be quantum dot microneedles , a digital identification mark from ID2020 , and a human implantable device for buying and selling cryptocurrency with a patent number of # 060606 .
The digital ID will come in the form of something called an Immunity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and all being funded by one man , Bill Gates , represents in total at the very least a stunning forerunner to the Mark of the Beast world system .
That ’ s at the very least estimation , taken to its logical end , it very well could be the actual Mark of the Beast system .
But today , I want to draw your attention to one component , the quantum dot microneedles that will deliver the vaccines , and a very , very unique biochemical that makes it all work @ @ @ @ @ @ @ while reading this , you might want to sit down .
Today we bring you ‘ near infrared bioluminescence enzyme luciferase ‘ which is the chemical that will make the quantum dot vaccination readable through a special mobile device app .
That ’ s right , the enzyme that will light up Bill Gates Human Implantable Quantum Dot Microneedle Vaccination Delivery System is called Luciferase , that ’ s what makes the vaccination readable long after the victim has been injected , and what allows a mere vaccination to function as a mark @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Satanists Rule The World , Not Politicians , Bankers Or Military Heads Want to see what Luciferase does ?
Take a look .
One last thing you might find interesting .
A sharp-eyed NTEB ’ er named Matt took our phrase ‘ Human Implantable Quantum Dot Microneedle Vaccination Delivery System ‘ , and removed the word ‘ human ’ and guess what ?
The numerical value of that phrase adds up to 666 , see for yourself .
Luciferase , remember that word .

by Joe Hoft
Billy Boy wants the world to take the COVID jjab maybe multiple times and now he’s buying up farm land across the US. What are this guy’s real intentions?
Successful Farming reported two days ago that creepy Microsoft Billionaire Billy Boy is now the largest farm land owner in the US:
“In 1994, the Gateses hired the former Putnam Investments bond-fund manager to diversify the couple’s portfolio away from the Microsoft co-founder’s 45 percent stake in the technology giant while maintaining comparable or better returns.
“According to a 2014 profile of Larson in the Wall Street Journal, these investments include a substantial stake in AutoNation, hospitality interests such as the Charles Hotel in Cambridge and the Four Seasons in San Francisco, and ‘at least 100,000 acres of farmland in California, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, and other states … .’
“According to the Land Report 100 Research Team, that figure is currently more than twice that amount, which means Billy Boy, co-founder of Microsoft, has an alter ego: Farmer Bill, the guy who owns more farmland than anyone else in America.”
It’s hard to figure out Gates. He made billions running Microsoft and then the past few years has come across as a self-proclaimed expert on vaccinations.
Just last month Billy Boy was suggesting that bars and restaurants should close for the next 4 – 6 months.
Over the summer Gates said we won’t be back to normal till the world is mostly vaccinated.
Gates also said that multiple jjab doses may be necessary.
Billy Boy has also admitted recently that his $10 Billion investment in jjabs is his best investment to date, bringing him $200 BILLIONS (A Return Of 20:1).
Billy Boy is likely up to something nefarious – recommending forced vaccinations while buying up US farmland.


humansarefree--2020-05-13--Half a Million Extra HIV Deaths Expected Due to COVID-19 Service Disruptions

Gains made in preventing mother-to-child transmission of HIV could be reversed , with new HIV infections among children up by as much as 104 % .
A modelling group convened by the World Health Organization and UNAIDS has estimated that if efforts are not made to mitigate and overcome interruptions in health services and supplies during the COVID-19 pandemic , a six-month disruption of antiretroviral therapy could lead to more than 500,000 extra deaths from AIDS-related illnesses , including from tuberculosis , in sub-Saharan Africa in 2020–2021 .
In 2018 , an estimated 470,000 people died of AIDS-related deaths in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reasons that could cause services to be interrupted—this modelling exercise makes it clear that communities and partners need to take action now as the impact of a six-month disruption of antiretroviral therapy could effectively set the clock on AIDS-related deaths back to 2008 , when more than 950,000 AIDS-related deaths were observed in the region .
And people would continue to die from the disruption in large numbers for at least another five years , with an annual average excess in deaths of 40 % over the next half a decade .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have some impact on HIV incidence in the next year .
“ The terrible prospect of half a million more people in Africa dying of AIDS-related illnesses is like stepping back into history , ” said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus , Director-General of the World Health Organization .
[ Let ’ s end the insanity , # jailBillGates and get our world back from these psychopaths ! ]

Gains made in preventing mother-to-child transmission of HIV could be reversed, with new HIV infections among children up by as much as 104%.
A modelling group convened by the World Health Organization and UNAIDS has estimated that if efforts are not made to mitigate and overcome interruptions in health services and supplies during the COVID-19 pandemic, a six-month disruption of antiretroviral therapy could lead to more than 500,000 extra deaths from AIDS-related illnesses, including from tuberculosis, in sub-Saharan Africa in 2020–2021.
In 2018, an estimated 470,000 people died of AIDS-related deaths in the region.
There are many different reasons that could cause services to be interrupted—this modelling exercise makes it clear that communities and partners need to take action now as the impact of a six-month disruption of antiretroviral therapy could effectively set the clock on AIDS-related deaths back to 2008, when more than 950,000 AIDS-related deaths were observed in the region.
And people would continue to die from the disruption in large numbers for at least another five years, with an annual average excess in deaths of 40% over the next half a decade.
In addition, HIV service disruptions could also have some impact on HIV incidence in the next year.
“The terrible prospect of half a million more people in Africa dying of AIDS-related illnesses is like stepping back into history,” said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director-General of the World Health Organization.
[Let’s end the insanity, #jailBillGates and get our world back from these psychopaths!]
Continue reading: UNAIDS.org


humansarefree--2020-05-14--Bill Gates, HR6666, Remdesivir, Deaths in Italy

Each of these subjects deserves its own article .
Bill Gates would require a library of thick volumes .
I don ’ t have the time to write separate pieces , since I ’ m also busy with other research on the fake pandemic .
BILL GATES : Here , from FAIR , the long-standing media-watch group , is a September 4 , 2016 , article , “ This Guardian piece touting Bill Gates ’ education investment brought to you by Bill Gates.
” It adds a layer of explanation about Gates ’ Death Star : “ The Gates Foundation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and often millions to such media organizations as NBCUniversal , Al Jazeera , BBC , Viacom ( CBS ) and Participant Media ( the producer of pro-charter school documentary Waiting for Superman ) .
“ Both Gates and the Gates Foundation are sizable shareholders in Comcast , which is the primary investor in Buzzfeed and Vox , as well the parent corporation of MSNBC and NBC News — the latter of which teamed up with Gates and other noted education experts like Exxon and University of Phoenix Online for the week-long charter school @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( Read more on the subject here ) .
“ In 2009 , the New York Times reported that the Gates Foundation was partnering with media companies to write and shape stories to ‘ embed ’ messages in primetime dramas : ” “ ’ It [ the Gates Foundation ] is less well known as a behind-the-scenes influencer of public attitudes toward these issues by helping to shape story lines and insert messages into popular entertainment like the television shows ER , Law & Order : SVU and Private Practice .
The foundation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ surgical safety AND THE SPREAD OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES have found their way into these shows.
” [ CAPS are mine ] “ His enormous wealth and the reach of media parent corporations seem to exempt Gates from routine disclosure requirements .
“ He was offered up as an education expert in the pro-charter Waiting for Superman , without any mention of the fact that he donated at least $ 2 million to the film and had a media partnership with its distributor , Viacom .
“ He is given softball interviews in Comcast-backed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a major Comcast investor .
Because his stake in media companies is laundered enough times , it ’ s assumed not to merit mention.
” “ In the case of the Guardian , Gates effectively owns an entire vertical , so when one of his investments is written up , one doesn ’ t notice the conflict of interest—like a fish doesn ’ t notice water .
Because his influence is everywhere , it appears to be nowhere.
” HR6666 : This aptly numbered bill is moving forward in the US House Energy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Testing , Reaching , And Contacting Everyone , ” it officially embeds the snitch culture — with benefits for new agents of the State : “ To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to award grants to eligible entities to conduct diagnostic testing for COVID–19 , and related activities such as contact tracing , through mobile health units and , as necessary , at individuals ’ residences , and for other purposes.
” “ The Secretary of Health and Human Services , acting through the Director of the Centers for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ grants to eligible entities to conduct diagnostic testing for COVID–19 , to trace and monitor the contacts of infected individuals , and to support the quarantine of such contacts… ” HR6666 funds this enterprise to the tune of “ $ 100,000,000,000 for fiscal year 2020 ; and such sums as may be necessary for each of fiscal year 2021 and any subsequent fiscal year during which the emergency period continues.
” “ Have you always wanted to run around like a little fascist , targeting the unwary , the sheep , the outliers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Here ’ s your chance .
“ The State will pay you to do it .
Who knows ?
Maybe the government will design a uniform for you , embroidered with the logo of a skull or a virus with spikes.
” REMDESIVIR : This is the Fauci COVID drug .
He wants the antiviral to hit the market yesterday .
At the Alliance for Human Research and Protection ( ahrp.org ) , an article points to the fraud : “ Fauci ’ s Promotional Hype Catapults Gilead ’ s Remdesivir ” : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ [ the manufacturer of remdesivir ] issued a press release announcing that it ‘ was aware of positive data emerging from [ a ] National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease ( NIAID ) study ’ .
” [ Gilead provided assistance on study design and conduct to NIAID . ]
“ Based on the ‘ positive data ’ from the NIAID study , the Food and Drug Administration approved emergency use of remdesivir against COVID-19 on May 1.
” “ …Dr .
Anthony Fauci , who heads the President ’ s Coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , since 1984 , has a vested interest in remdesivir .
“ He sponsored the [ NIAID ] clinical trial whose detailed results have NOT been peer-reviewed .
What ’ s more , [ on May 1 ] HE declared the tenuous results to be ‘ highly significant , ’ and pronounced remdesivir to be the new ‘ standard of care.
’ ” “ Dr .
Fauci made the promotional pronouncement while sitting on a couch in the White House , without providing a detailed news release ; without a briefing at a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – as is the norm and practice , to allow scientists and researchers to review the data.
” “ What Dr. Fauci failed to disclose to the public in his promotional pronouncement was that the [ list of ] primary outcomes [ measures for success or failure ] of the [ NAID ] study [ NCT04280705 ] were changed on April 16 , 2020 .
Changes in the Primary Outcome are posted on Clinical Trials.gov.
” “ Changing primary outcomes [ measures ] after a study has commenced is considered dubious and suspicious.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ respected prominent leaders in the medical community — such as Steven Nissen , MD , the chief academic officer at the Cleveland Clinic and Eric Topol , MD , director and founder of the Scripps Research Translational Institute in California – were unimpressed by remdesivir ’ s tentative , modest benefit at best.
” “ …the NIAID-Gilead study results have not been published in peer-reviewed literature – nor have details of the findings been disclosed .
“ However , they were publicly promoted by the head of the federal agency that conducted the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ What better free advertisement ?
” So… take this admittedly toxic drug .
Convincing data ?
No need .
Just trust Fauci .
Like other drugs of its type , remdesivir inhibits the machinery of cell-reproduction in the body .
DEATHS IN ITALY : I have reported on this con in the past .
Italy ’ s own National Institute of Health has been combing through the records of patients who have died .
Their average age ?
79.5 .
And the overwhelming percentage of these people were already suffering from multiple , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had certainly been treated with a number of toxic medical drugs .
Claiming their deaths stemmed from the purported COVID-19 virus would be absurd .
Add to these facts the horrendous air pollution in areas of Northern Italy .
Toxic air can easily explain the lung conditions attributed to the virus .
In recent years , the annual number of flu cases in Italy averages roughly five million .
It ’ s a simple matter to label some of these people COVID-19 .
I ’ ve also indicated that vaccination campaigns could account @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
I have a few possible clues in that regard .
“ Could a new flu vaccine be partly responsible for the COVID-19 mortality rate in Italy ?
…My colleague , Dr. Alex Vazquez , provided me with a valuable insight .
“ In September 2019 , Italy rolled out an entirely new type of influenza vaccine .
This vaccine called VIQCC is different than others .
Most available influenza vaccines are produced in embryonated chicken eggs .
“ VIQCC , however , is produced from cultured animal cells rather than eggs and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the immune system as a result .
VIQCC also contains four types of viruses – 2 type A viruses ( H1N1 and H3N2 ) and 2 type B viruses… ” “ Italians are still trying to understand why Bergamo , of all the cities of Italy , is the epicenter of the Coronavirus epidemic… ” “ One factor may be that the city was vaccinated en mass not once , but twice , in the 2 months preceding the Coronavirus outbreak in the city.
” In the fall [ 2019 ] , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ against the winter flu were administered by the local health board .
Of those , 129,000 were Italians over 65 years of age .
Of those , 129,000 , 70 % had grave heart problems .
“ Then , again , in December , from the 24th through to January , there was a mass vaccination program against Hepatitis-C of 21,331 citizens of Bergamo .
And in the surrounding province , another 12,000 citizens.
” “ In September 2019 was made available for the first time in Italy a ‘ cell-based ’ flu @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that is produced from cultured animal cells rather than eggs.
” “ VIQCC is a quadrivalent flu vaccine that contains 2 type A viruses ( H1N1 and H3N2 ) and 2 type B viruses .
It is approved for people ages 9 and older.
” ANY vaccines given to people whose immune systems are already weakened — such as the elderly and infirm — are automatically dangerous and life-threatening at a high level .
Two vaccines within the space of a few months , one of which has added new viral material and/or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ debris — plus the usual toxic chemicals — and you have a potential recipe for disaster .

I don’t know about you, but I find Billy Boy to be one of the weirdest, most ghoulish people out there. Billy Boy is not a doctor, or a scientist, or a politician.
Yes, I am sure you already know this, but in this day and age, where he’s treated like all of the above, it’s worth repeating.
Gates is a really, really rich nerd who makes computer software, and mosquito nets, yet somehow he’s been hailed a “scientific doctor politician” who has an awful lot to say about our nation’s health and politics.
It seems like whenever there’s a discussion on COVID and jjabs and how to properly handle this “pandemic,” Mr. Gates is in the middle of that convo.
Many people find this to be disturbing, especially since Gates is infamous for his “population control” stance.
Sure, there can be a legit debate about controlling exploding populations in certain areas of the world where they can’t sustain a certain quality of human life, but when that conversation is presented by a guy who is pushing jjabs, it can understandably creep people out.
And further to that “population control” point, it doesn’t help Mr. Gates much when video clips like this surface.
Right now, we’re in the midst of a “pandemic” that many experts believe originated in a lab, and some even think it could have been purposely released as a “bio-weapon.”
Ex-Pfizer VP Says Experimental MRNA Vaccines Could Be ‘Used For Massive-Scale Depopulation’.
Of course, fact-checkers will say that’s not true, but people can believe whatever the hell they want because this is America.
On the flip side, other experts claim it’s not a “man-made” virus and it originated in a “wet market’ and came to us from animals.
Again, nobody knows for sure – not even the so-called “experts.”
We may never know what really happened with COVID-19, but watch this video clip, and you’ll discover that Mr. Gates certainly thinks viruses being released on purpose is a “thing.”
“An epidemic, either naturally caused or intentionally caused, is the most likely thing to cause, say, 10 million excess deaths.” – Billy Boy, 2017
Again, creepy… You can watch the video below:
This ghoul just spilled the beans "intentionally caused epidemic…" pic.twitter.com/Nd4w57P9gE — Amy (@RestingTwitFace) February 28, 2021
Also Watch: Billy Boy Admits To Human Depopulation Program
Billy Boy comes off as this really eccentric Napoleon-like character, with more money than God and he’s got his nose into all sorts of viruses and jjabs. It’s bizarre and troublesome.
And far too many people have given him a free pass to play “research scientist” and “doctor” when in fact, he’s neither.
I think it’s time for Bill to retire from the public eye and go be a recluse on some remote island.
I hear Epstein’s island is available. That sounds like a good place for him to retire.
If he wants to create jjabs, he can do it for himself and his family and leave the rest of us alone.
Source: PeopleAlwaysWin.com


humansarefree--2020-05-14--Soros-funded NGO Demands $1,200 of US Taxpayers for Every Illegal Migrant

United We Dream , a George Soros-backed NGO , is demanding every illegal immigrant in the United States receive $ 1,200 in federal aid checks as a part of federal coronavirus aid , which could cost billions for American taxpayer if it were to be approved .
The NGO is making the demand in conjunction with a network of other pro-migration lobbying groups , such as the National Immigrant Justice Center , and the National Immigration Law Center .
With estimates of the illegal alien population estimated between 11 to 22 million in the US , the migration groups are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for every illegal immigrant that has a Tax Identification Number ( ITIN ) .
Also read : America Is Under Attack By 187 Groups Funded By George Soros • George Soros ’ Organizations Work Tirelessly To Flood The European Continent With Illegal Migrants • George Soros Letter Reveals Globalist Plan To Destroy The First World With Global Migrant Invasions In an effort to aid struggling Americans , the US government has issued $ 1,200 checks for every American citizen with a social security number as well as “ resident aliens ” .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Americans afloat during the biggest American economic crisis since the Great Depression , including the estimated 22 million citizens who are now out of work .
United We Dream , which has received funding from Soros ’ s Open Society Foundation , believes that illegal residents should also have access to this aid .
It is a part of a wide-range of open border activist pushing for more taxpayer funds for illegal immigrants .

United We Dream, a George Soros-backed NGO, is demanding every illegal immigrant in the United States receive $1,200 in federal aid checks as a part of federal coronavirus aid, which could cost billions for American taxpayer if it were to be approved.
The NGO is making the demand in conjunction with a network of other pro-migration lobbying groups, such as the National Immigrant Justice Center, and the National Immigration Law Center.
With estimates of the illegal alien population estimated between 11 to 22 million in the US, the migration groups are asking the federal government to issue checks for every illegal immigrant that has a Tax Identification Number (ITIN).
Also read: America Is Under Attack By 187 Groups Funded By George Soros
Related:
In an effort to aid struggling Americans, the US government has issued $1,200 checks for every American citizen with a social security number as well as “resident aliens”.
The funds are meant to be help keep Americans afloat during the biggest American economic crisis since the Great Depression, including the estimated 22 million citizens who are now out of work.
United We Dream, which has received funding from Soros’s Open Society Foundation, believes that illegal residents should also have access to this aid. It is a part of a wide-range of open border activist pushing for more taxpayer funds for illegal immigrants.
Continue reading here…