humansarefree--2020-12-19--MI Sec of State Official Caught on Video Telling Volunteers to Count ‘Multiple Ballots with the Very

MI Sec of State Official Caught on Video Telling Volunteers to Count ‘Multiple Ballots with the Very Same Signature’ During ‘Audit’ of Votes in Antrim County

Two weeks ago , Michigan 13th Circuit Court Judge Kevin A Elsenheimer agreed to allow Mr. DePerno ’ s client , William Bailey , and a highly skilled team of IT experts to perform a forensic examination on 16 of the Dominion voting machines in Antrim County .
On Monday , Judge Elsenheimer agreed to allow the results of the forensic examination to be released to the public .
The results were damning .
After the forensic examination of 16 Dominion Voting machines in Antrim , Co. , MI , Allied Security Operations Group has concluded that the Dominion Voting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rate .
DePerno explained that when ballots are put through the machine , a whopping 68.05 % error rate means that 68.05 % of the ballots are sent for bulk adjudication , which means they collect the ballots in a folder .
“ The ballots are sent somewhere where people in another location can change the vote , ” DePerno explained .
The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is 1 in 250,000 ballots or .0008 % .
Based on the Allied Security Operations report , Constitutional Attorney @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan .
We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.
” The stunning report was widely criticized by the Democrat Party mainstream media and by the dishonest Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson .
Following the bombshell findings by Mr. DePerno and his team of IT experts , a “ risk-limited audit ” was ordered by Sec .
of State Benson .
Constitutional Attorney Matt DePerno was invited to observe the “ risk-limiting audit ” of Antrim County @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the Kearney Twp .
hall in Bellaire , MI.
, where 6 officials from the Secretary of State continuously walked around the room observing and correcting the counters who dared to stray from their objectives .
The risk-limiting audit process can be conducted on any set of paper ballots that has a record of the number of ballots cast , how they are stored , and how to retrieve any particular ballot ( ballot manifest ) .
For an RLA to meaningfully support confidence in the reported election outcome , the standard @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Paper ballots preferably marked by hand and supplemented with a ballot marking device for those who need to use one .
A deliberate and intentional step for a voter to check the paper ballot for accuracy before casting the ballot ( voter verification ) .
Rigorous ballot accounting and a properly maintained chain of custody of the ballots .
If photographic evidence proves seals on the Dominion voting machines were broken on November 27 , how can a “ properly maintained chain of custody of ballots ” be assured .
The answer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Before her so-called audit was completed , Sec of State Benson explained the purpose of the “ risk limited audit ” to the media while ensuring the integrity of the elections in Michigan : “ While we know the machine tabulators functioned properly in Antrim , we are conducting this audit to assure the public of what countless officials from both parties at the federal , state and local levels have already confirmed – that this was the most secure election in our nation ’ s history and the certified results are an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voters , ” adding , “ It is time for Michigan , and the nation to once and for all dismiss the meritless disinformation campaign that seeks to undermine the integrity of our election and move forward in support of our collective democracy.
” Mr. DePerno , who acted as an observer to the “ risk-limited audit , ” doesn ’ t agree with Ms. Benson about the integrity of Michigan ’ s election and has provided us with video and photographic evidence to prove that he was again able to debunk her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in our nation ’ s history.
” The first video provided by Matthew DePerno shows a bin of ballots from Mancelona Township , Precinct # 1 .
The bin was delivered to three of the 20 bi-partisan volunteers that included several Antrim Co. city clerks who agreed to assist with the “ risk-limited audit.
” Inside the bin , tabulated ballots were mixed in with ballots that were never tabulated , and several blank ballots were mixed in as well .
Mr. DePerno referred to the bin of ballots as “ an absolute @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we reported about photographs taken at Mancelona Township ’ s Precinct # 1 on November 27 , 2020 , that showed both of the security seals on the Dominion Voting machine were missing .
The second video was taken at a table where ballots were being counted in Helena Twp .
The volunteers can be seen questioning why there were fewer ballots in the bin than the original number that was recorded in the previous recount ?
Shortly after asking the question , a male SOS official approached the table with a bag @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them to count them .
Attorney Matt DePerno witnessed the unidentified male SOS rep pulling the “ spoiled ballot bag out of the bin and delivering it to the volunteers who were “ auditing ” the ballots .
DePerno also witnessed the SOS official telling them to add the “ spoiled ballots ” to the count .
The third video was taken at a table where the ballots from Central Lake Twp .
were being counted .
In the video , a male counter can be seen questioning “ multiple ballots with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , 138 ballots had write-in-votes where the penmanship was exactly the same .
In the video below , the SOS official can be seen demanding that the counters ignore what they believe is voter fraud and count the ballots .
“ We need to do the counts because if we don ’ t have the counts , then we can ’ t move forward .
And we understand that there is a concern with this precinct — but this is not a time for you to be investigating right now.
” “ Did @ @ @ @ @ @ @ male counter asks .
“ No , ” she replies , adding , “ So , you need to move forward with the audit , so we can get the numbers , so we can see how many ballots are here.
” The female counter asks , “ So when we ’ re done with the audit , there ’ s still the opportunity to challenge the fact that we have multiple ballots with the very same signature ?
” she asks .
“ I don ’ t know if ‘ challenge ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ SOS official says .
The male volunteer tells the SOS , “ We ’ ll go ahead and count the ballots moving forward , but we will separate out , and count those — there ’ s going to be an asterisk , saying ‘ these ballots have the same signature.
’ ” “ And again , we know that you have a concern with this precinct , ” she tells them , explaining , “ That ’ s not your role at this very moment , ” as she continues to push @ @ @ @ @ @ @ signatures and only count the ballots .
“ What I need you to do right now is finish the audit , ” she tells them again .
Both of the volunteers explain that they are going to make a note of the ballots , to which the SOS official replies , “ Again , that is not the process.
” The SOS official implores them to continue to count the presidential ballots .
At no point does the SOS official assure them that the issue of the multiple potentially fraudulent ballots will be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ count them as if they were all legitimate ballots .
In this video , the SOS official can be seen telling the volunteers who are objecting to adding the ballots in question to the vote total , “ This is not an investigation right now !
” On December 16 , one day after Dominion Voting Systems CEO John Poulos testified in front of the MI Senate Oversight Committee , Mr. DePerno contacted us to say Poulos was incorrect in his statement that the ballots were securely stored .
In fact , Mr. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were broken on one of the tabulators .
DePerno explained , “ In Central Lake , the lock that protects the side data port where you can insert a thumb drive in order to perform a software upgrade , that could change the program , was missing.
” He explains , “ The missing lock gives the ability of any person , including a voter to change the Dominion Voting machine program.
” Mr. DePerno explained to us that once the seals are broken , and the lock is removed , the integrity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ It definitely showed that someone had accessed the inside of the tabulator , and it no longer represents a secure voting platform , ” DePerno said .
The bin ( or box ) seen in the image below is where the ballots are stored .
DePerno explained , “ If you remove the tape , it gives you the ability to separate the tabulator from the box that contains the ballots.
” The photo below shows the stack of ballots in Central Lake that were cast for Joe Biden .
The ballots @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the counters pulled forward after objecting to the legitimacy of the ballots .
Mr. DePerno was stunned by the number of blank ballots that were mixed in with actual ballots , saying that he believes he observed more blank ballots in the recount than there are registered voters in Antrim County .
“ The guidelines from RLA were not followed .
What they did yesterday was not an audit under those guidelines .
It was a hand recount of the presidential race only and failed to address many of the problems with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who assisted in the hand recount were not allowed to ask any questions or question any ballots .
“ This hand recount also failed to address any of the glaring problems from the erroneous counts conducted on November 3 and November 6 .
“ Yesterday was nothing more than political theatre designed to allow the Secretary of State to again publish the same false narrative to the Michigan voters .
Yesterday , when the people conducting the count dared ask questions , they were shut down.
” DePerno ’ s forensic and photographic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ entire Michigan election into question .
Will the media or the courts care , or have we now entered a period in our nation ’ s history where we have officially become a Banana Republica after decades of Republicans ignoring the corruption of our media and our judicial system .

Constitutional Attorney Matthew DePerno is an American hero.
Two weeks ago, Michigan 13th Circuit Court Judge Kevin A Elsenheimer agreed to allow Mr. DePerno’s client, William Bailey, and a highly skilled team of IT experts to perform a forensic examination on 16 of the Dominion voting machines in Antrim County.
On Monday, Judge Elsenheimer agreed to allow the results of the forensic examination to be released to the public. The results were damning.
THE REPORT:
After the forensic examination of 16 Dominion Voting machines in Antrim, Co., MI, Allied Security Operations Group has concluded that the Dominion Voting machines were assigned a 68.05% error rate.
DePerno explained that when ballots are put through the machine, a whopping 68.05% error rate means that 68.05% of the ballots are sent for bulk adjudication, which means they collect the ballots in a folder.
“The ballots are sent somewhere where people in another location can change the vote,” DePerno explained.
The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is 1 in 250,000 ballots or .0008%.
Based on the Allied Security Operations report, Constitutional Attorney Matthew DePerno states: “we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.”
The stunning report was widely criticized by the Democrat Party mainstream media and by the dishonest Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson.
Following the bombshell findings by Mr. DePerno and his team of IT experts, a “risk-limited audit” was ordered by Sec. of State Benson.
Constitutional Attorney Matt DePerno was invited to observe the “risk-limiting audit” of Antrim County’s vote that took place yesterday in the Kearney Twp. hall in Bellaire, MI., where 6 officials from the Secretary of State continuously walked around the room observing and correcting the counters who dared to stray from their objectives.
According to Verified Voting:
The risk-limiting audit process can be conducted on any set of paper ballots that has a record of the number of ballots cast, how they are stored, and how to retrieve any particular ballot (ballot manifest). For an RLA to meaningfully support confidence in the reported election outcome, the standard is higher, and requires the following:
Paper ballots preferably marked by hand and supplemented with a ballot marking device for those who need to use one.
A deliberate and intentional step for a voter to check the paper ballot for accuracy before casting the ballot (voter verification).
Rigorous ballot accounting and a properly maintained chain of custody of the ballots.
If photographic evidence proves seals on the Dominion voting machines were broken on November 27, how can a “properly maintained chain of custody of ballots” be assured. The answer is, it can’t.
Before her so-called audit was completed, Sec of State Benson explained the purpose of the “risk limited audit” to the media while ensuring the integrity of the elections in Michigan:
“While we know the machine tabulators functioned properly in Antrim, we are conducting this audit to assure the public of what countless officials from both parties at the federal, state and local levels have already confirmed – that this was the most secure election in our nation’s history and the certified results are an accurate reflection of the will of the voters,” adding, “It is time for Michigan, and the nation to once and for all dismiss the meritless disinformation campaign that seeks to undermine the integrity of our election and move forward in support of our collective democracy.”
Mr. DePerno, who acted as an observer to the “risk-limited audit,” doesn’t agree with Ms. Benson about the integrity of Michigan’s election and has provided us with video and photographic evidence to prove that he was again able to debunk her statement about the “most secure election in our nation’s history.”
The first video provided by Matthew DePerno shows a bin of ballots from Mancelona Township, Precinct #1. The bin was delivered to three of the 20 bi-partisan volunteers that included several Antrim Co. city clerks who agreed to assist with the “risk-limited audit.”
Inside the bin, tabulated ballots were mixed in with ballots that were never tabulated, and several blank ballots were mixed in as well. Mr. DePerno referred to the bin of ballots as “an absolute mess!”
On December 16, we reported about photographs taken at Mancelona Township’s Precinct #1 on November 27, 2020, that showed both of the security seals on the Dominion Voting machine were missing.
The second video was taken at a table where ballots were being counted in Helena Twp. The volunteers can be seen questioning why there were fewer ballots in the bin than the original number that was recorded in the previous recount?
Shortly after asking the question, a male SOS official approached the table with a bag marked “spoiled ballots” and told them to count them.
Attorney Matt DePerno witnessed the unidentified male SOS rep pulling the “spoiled ballot bag out of the bin and delivering it to the volunteers who were “auditing” the ballots. DePerno also witnessed the SOS official telling them to add the “spoiled ballots” to the count.
The third video was taken at a table where the ballots from Central Lake Twp. were being counted. In the video, a male counter can be seen questioning “multiple ballots with the same signature.” According to Matthew DePerno, 138 ballots had write-in-votes where the penmanship was exactly the same.
In the video below, the SOS official can be seen demanding that the counters ignore what they believe is voter fraud and count the ballots.
“We need to do the counts because if we don’t have the counts, then we can’t move forward. And we understand that there is a concern with this precinct — but this is not a time for you to be investigating right now.”
“Did you find something else?” the male counter asks.
“No,” she replies, adding, “So, you need to move forward with the audit, so we can get the numbers, so we can see how many ballots are here.”
The female counter asks, “So when we’re done with the audit, there’s still the opportunity to challenge the fact that we have multiple ballots with the very same signature?” she asks.
“I don’t know if ‘challenge’ is the right word,” the SOS official says.
“But we’re challenging — ” the volunteer says.
The male volunteer tells the SOS, “We’ll go ahead and count the ballots moving forward, but we will separate out, and count those — there’s going to be an asterisk, saying ‘these ballots have the same signature.’”
“And again, we know that you have a concern with this precinct,” she tells them, explaining, “That’s not your role at this very moment,” as she continues to push for them to ignore the multiple matching signatures and only count the ballots.
“What I need you to do right now is finish the audit,” she tells them again. Both of the volunteers explain that they are going to make a note of the ballots, to which the SOS official replies, “Again, that is not the process.”
The SOS official implores them to continue to count the presidential ballots.
At no point does the SOS official assure them that the issue of the multiple potentially fraudulent ballots will be addressed, but instead demands that they count them as if they were all legitimate ballots.
In this video, the SOS official can be seen telling the volunteers who are objecting to adding the ballots in question to the vote total, “This is not an investigation right now!”
On December 16, one day after Dominion Voting Systems CEO John Poulos testified in front of the MI Senate Oversight Committee, Mr. DePerno contacted us to say Poulos was incorrect in his statement that the ballots were securely stored. In fact, Mr. Derno provided us with photos showing seals were broken on one of the tabulators.
DePerno explained, “In Central Lake, the lock that protects the side data port where you can insert a thumb drive in order to perform a software upgrade, that could change the program, was missing.”
He explains, “The missing lock gives the ability of any person, including a voter to change the Dominion Voting machine program.”
Mr. DePerno explained to us that once the seals are broken, and the lock is removed, the integrity of the machines has been compromised.
“It definitely showed that someone had accessed the inside of the tabulator, and it no longer represents a secure voting platform,” DePerno said.
The bin (or box) seen in the image below is where the ballots are stored. DePerno explained, “If you remove the tape, it gives you the ability to separate the tabulator from the box that contains the ballots.”
The photo below shows the stack of ballots in Central Lake that were cast for Joe Biden. The ballots that are pulled forward are all ballots that the counters pulled forward after objecting to the legitimacy of the ballots.
Mr. DePerno was stunned by the number of blank ballots that were mixed in with actual ballots, saying that he believes he observed more blank ballots in the recount than there are registered voters in Antrim County.
DePerno told us,
“The guidelines from RLA were not followed. What they did yesterday was not an audit under those guidelines. It was a hand recount of the presidential race only and failed to address many of the problems with down-ballot races. Members of the public who assisted in the hand recount were not allowed to ask any questions or question any ballots.
“This hand recount also failed to address any of the glaring problems from the erroneous counts conducted on November 3 and November 6.
“Yesterday was nothing more than political theatre designed to allow the Secretary of State to again publish the same false narrative to the Michigan voters. Yesterday, when the people conducting the count dared ask questions, they were shut down.”
DePerno’s forensic and photographic evidence should be enough to call the entire Michigan election into question.
Will the media or the courts care, or have we now entered a period in our nation’s history where we have officially become a Banana Republica after decades of Republicans ignoring the corruption of our media and our judicial system.
By Jim Hoft, Guest writer


humansarefree--2020-12-20--President Trump Releases Video: ‘FIGHT FOR TRUMP – SAVE AMERICA – SAVE THE WORLD’

President Trump releases a video entitled ‘ Fight for Trump ’ in the middle of the night .
Last night , President Trump sent out a tweet at 1:42 AM , where he promoted a “ big protest ” in DC against the election fraud that appears to have taken place in November .
President Trump included a link to a Washington Examiner story about Peter Navarro ’ s 36-page report alleging election fraud that was “ more than sufficient ” to swing the victory .
Navarro is the Director of the Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ impossible to have lost the 2020 Election .
Big protest in D.C. on January 6th .
Be there , will be wild !
” President Trump wrote .
President Trump followed up the tweet with a video labeled ‘ Fight for Trump ’ : # FightForTrump has caught on , internationally , no doubt to the dismay of freedom-haters : Of course the 74 million + who voted for President Trump will fight for the survival of the country and our individual freedoms .
No one who voted for President Trump wants to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hole .

President Trump releases a video entitled ‘Fight for Trump’ in the middle of the night.
Last night, President Trump sent out a tweet at 1:42 AM, where he promoted a “big protest” in DC against the election fraud that appears to have taken place in November.
President Trump included a link to a Washington Examiner story about Peter Navarro’s 36-page report alleging election fraud that was “more than sufficient” to swing the victory.
Navarro is the Director of the Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy.
“A great report by Peter. Statistically impossible to have lost the 2020 Election. Big protest in D.C. on January 6th. Be there, will be wild!” President Trump wrote.
President Trump followed up the tweet with a video labeled ‘Fight for Trump’:
#FightForTrump has caught on, internationally, no doubt to the dismay of freedom-haters:
Scenes from a Taiwanese "Stop The Steal" & "Fight For Trump" rally today. President Trump is the leader of a global populist movement fighting against socialism, communism, & a political elite which no longer represents "we the people". China stands at Taiwan's doorstep.🔻 pic.twitter.com/4KmcQxnspu — Kanekoa (@KanekoaTheGreat) December 19, 2020
Of course the 74 million + who voted for President Trump will fight for the survival of the country and our individual freedoms. No one who voted for President Trump wants to see this country become a communist hell hole.
Via TheGatewayPundit.com


humansarefree--2020-12-19--How Belarus Exposes the Lockdown Lie

How Belarus Exposes the Lockdown Lie

Most European governments instituted the shutdown of economies , restrictions on freedom of movement and other policies known as lockdown .
This was allegedly in response to the spread of Sars-Cov-2 , a dangerous respiratory virus that originated in Wuhan , China .
Few countries rejected this approach ; Sweden is the most well known of these .
However , a more interesting case of dissent from the official narrative is Belarus and its leader Aleksandr Lukashenka .
This article will outline Lukashenka ’ s approach to the alleged pandemic , followed by an analysis of death figures and how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lockdown advocates .
Bombshell : Belarusian President Offered $ 940M By IMF And World Bank To Introduce Quarantine , Isolation & Curfew ‘ Like In Italy ’ The alleged pandemic broke out in Europe in March 2020 , and most European governments followed the severe strategy of imposing lockdowns .
Lukashenka ’ s response was much more limited .
A Belarussian press release from the 25th March talks about the quarantines set up for people who enter Belarus : Quarantine stations were set up at all the points of entry .
Screening measures @ @ @ @ @ @ @ control really works , [ healthcare minister ] Vladimir Karanik noted .
This helped identify symptoms of a viral infection in more than 250 people , however the absolute majority of them had influenza , parainfluenza , and adenovirus .
If a person tests positive for coronavirus , healthcare workers put their contacts under medical observation .
“ Such a targeted approach helps curb the spread of the virus , ” the minister said.
” Lukashenka also advocated staying at home if one has symptoms of the virus .
He also famously made @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Western media – giving health advice : I am teetotal , but in recent times I say jokingly , that it is necessary to not only wash hands with vodka , but probably that [ consuming ] 40-50 grams of a measure of clean spirit a day – [ can ] “ poison ” [ in commas in original text ] this virus .
But not at work.
” He then says that “ Today , go to the sauna .
But if [ you go ] two-three times a week that is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ us that this virus can not withstand temperatures of 60 degrees ” .
Overall , the Belarussian approach has been the least authoritarian in Europe .
Belarussian football went ahead as normal and fans were allowed to continue attending games .
Theatres , cafes and other social events continued and there was no shutdown of the economy .
Victory Day Parades also went ahead on the 9th May despite being cancelled in countries such as Russia .
Neither did Lukashenka delay scheduled elections , unlike Jacinda Ardern of New Zealand .
Western media @ @ @ @ @ @ @ laughable curiosity ( in cases where they did not ignore it entirely ) .
They mocked Lukashenka ’ s comments about vodka and saunas , using this was a way to avoid asking any deeper questions .
According to the official narrative , Belarus should have been a zone of death , destruction and disaster .
Neil Ferguson ’ s modelling – one of the key pieces of propaganda used to put Britain in lockdown – predicted that left unchecked Covid 19 would kill between 54,090 and 71,616 Belarussians .
So what are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is around 9.5million .
Of this population , as of December 12 , 2020 , a total of 1,263 deaths are recorded as being from Covid 19 .
It appears the first death in Belarus attributed to this disease was Mar 31 , with between 2 and 11 deaths recorded each day up until Dec.12 .
It goes without saying that 1,263 deaths out of a population of 9.5m is minuscule and hardly indicative of a deadly pandemic sweeping the country .
But critics of the Belarussian approach may claim that Lukashenka is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the country .
The most logical way to examine this question is to look at whether there are any excess deaths in Belarus in general over this period , and if so , how many .
Of course , just because there were excess deaths would not prove that the deaths were caused – or otherwise – by hidden cases of Covid 19 .
But a relatively low number of excess deaths would reveal that the claim that Lukashenka is hiding mass deaths from Covid 19 is not plausible .
According to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deaths in Belarus in the second quarter of 2020 ( April , May and June ) .
35,858 died in Belarus during this period , 5606 higher than in 2019 .
Examining the data , we can see that the vast majority of these excess deaths were in June , with virtually none in April and a small excess in May .
This figure is rather small compared with the predictions of doom and destruction put forward by the likes of Neil Ferguson .
A comparison with another country that did pursue lockdowns @ @ @ @ @ @ @ regarding the consequences of not locking down are unfounded .
This analysis was performed by taking the number of excess deaths for Belarus and then calculating the same figures for England and Wales from the weekly death data from 2019 and 2020 .
Belarus had 5605 excess deaths in April , May and June 2020 from a population of 9.5 million .
England and Wales had 54,798 excess deaths in the same period from a population of 59.5 million .
The population of England and Wales is 6.26 times larger than that of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by 6.26 gives a result of 8754 .
If Belarus had the same excess death rate as England and Wales another 3,149 deaths in Belarus would have been observed .
Or to phrase this data another way , if England and Wales had the same excess death rate as Belarus , there would have been 19,711 fewer deaths over the period .
Sweden : No Hard Lockdowns , Masks , Or Social Distancing And One Of The Lowest COVID-19 Fatality Rate In Europe The BMJ ’ s article on Belarus : Saving the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ damning for lockdown supporters .
However , there is one attempt to explain the low Belarus death rate despite the fact that there was no lockdown there , printed in the British Medical Journal .
The article puts forward four reasons why Belarus has a low death rate , some of which offer comparative data with the UK .
The first reason given in the article is that Belarus has a much higher amount of beds per capita – 11 per 1000 as opposed to the UK ’ s 2.5 per 1000 .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ having enough beds available to deal with a crisis , and not so many that money is being wasted on unnecessary beds .
The argument can be made that the NHS gets the balance wrong and leans towards having too few beds per capita .
For example , the UK had a large number of flu cases in the 2017-2018 season with hospitals having high bed occupancy rates .
However , bed occupancy in the UK significantly decreased due to the lockdowns and NHS policy of discharging as many patients as possible .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ weeks into lockdown , acute beds were 40 % unoccupied .
This hardly suggests a health service that would have been totally overwhelmed had it not locked down ( for comparison , NHS beds are usually 90 % full ) .
It may actually have been the case that the lockdown cost lives by cancelling treatment , expelling people from hospitals and promoting a fear based message that discouraged people from seeking treatment .
Another main argument of the article is that Belarus has a small number of elderly people in care homes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as opposed to the UK 854 per 100,000 ) .
It is true that a respiratory pathogen will find it easier to spread in an environment like a care home because of the close proximity of vulnerable individuals .
It is also true that the UK had a large number of care home deaths during this period .
However , the UK government policy towards care homes likely contributed at least some of the excess deaths caused during this period .
People in care homes were routinely denied hospital treatment and were unable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lack of visits by family caused many elderly patients to mentally give up and their condition deteriorated .
Any deaths that resulted from this , therefore , can not be attributed to a virus but government policy .
The argument also fails as a motivation for lockdowns .
If the majority of deaths are in the fairly contained environment such as a care home , locking down the whole society , such as closing shops and sports events , is going to have no effect on transmission within that environment .
Two other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ better Belarussian testing system , and the lack of interest in Belarus as a travel destination – also do not have any bearings on whether lockdowns are an effective strategy .
There is no evidence of people with a positive test but no symptoms being infectious .
It follows that testing more people isn ’ t going to lead to fewer deaths , so this can not explain the low Belarus death rate without a lockdown .
Belarus did carry out quarantine measures , whereas the UK continued to allow flights into the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is easier for Belarus ( than the UK ) to close its borders because it is not a major travel destination , which is true , but it can ’ t seriously be argued that setting up quarantine measures costs more than shutting down the entire country .
Once any hypothetical virus is also present in a country in significant numbers quarantine also becomes irrelevant .
The Belarussian case is a significant problem for those individuals who argue that lockdowns were necessary to prevent mass deaths from the deadly Covid 19 pandemic .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ a lower death rate than lockdown supporting England and Wales .
There are also no clear arguments as to why Belarus is so unique it could go without lockdowns while other countries had them .
Given the cost to the economy and mental wellbeing of imposing lockdowns , as well as the draconian restrictions on basic liberties , these facts strongly suggest that leaders that did impose lockdowns have a case to answer from their citizens .

Most European governments instituted the shutdown of economies, restrictions on freedom of movement and other policies known as lockdown. This was allegedly in response to the spread of Sars-Cov-2, a dangerous respiratory virus that originated in Wuhan, China.
Few countries rejected this approach; Sweden is the most well known of these. However, a more interesting case of dissent from the official narrative is Belarus and its leader Aleksandr Lukashenka.
This article will outline Lukashenka’s approach to the alleged pandemic, followed by an analysis of death figures and how the Belarussian case exposes the lies of lockdown advocates.
Bombshell: Belarusian President Offered $940M By IMF And World Bank To Introduce Quarantine, Isolation & Curfew ‘Like In Italy’
The Belarussian Approach to Covid 19
The alleged pandemic broke out in Europe in March 2020, and most European governments followed the severe strategy of imposing lockdowns.
Lukashenka’s response was much more limited. A Belarussian press release from the 25th March talks about the quarantines set up for people who enter Belarus:
Quarantine stations were set up at all the points of entry. Screening measures include temperature checks. This system of control really works, [healthcare minister] Vladimir Karanik noted.
This helped identify symptoms of a viral infection in more than 250 people, however the absolute majority of them had influenza, parainfluenza, and adenovirus. If a person tests positive for coronavirus, healthcare workers put their contacts under medical observation.
“Such a targeted approach helps curb the spread of the virus,” the minister said.”
Lukashenka also advocated staying at home if one has symptoms of the virus. He also famously made some comments – reported widely in the Western media – giving health advice:
I am teetotal, but in recent times I say jokingly, that it is necessary to not only wash hands with vodka, but probably that [consuming] 40-50 grams of a measure of clean spirit a day – [can] “poison” [in commas in original text] this virus. But not at work.”
He then says that “Today, go to the sauna. But if [you go] two-three times a week that is even healthier. The Chinese have told us that this virus cannot withstand temperatures of 60 degrees”.
Overall, the Belarussian approach has been the least authoritarian in Europe. Belarussian football went ahead as normal and fans were allowed to continue attending games.
Theatres, cafes and other social events continued and there was no shutdown of the economy. Victory Day Parades also went ahead on the 9th May despite being cancelled in countries such as Russia. Neither did Lukashenka delay scheduled elections, unlike Jacinda Ardern of New Zealand.
Western media treated Lukashenka’s approach as a laughable curiosity (in cases where they did not ignore it entirely). They mocked Lukashenka’s comments about vodka and saunas, using this was a way to avoid asking any deeper questions.
According to the official narrative, Belarus should have been a zone of death, destruction and disaster.
Neil Ferguson’s modelling – one of the key pieces of propaganda used to put Britain in lockdown – predicted that left unchecked Covid 19 would kill between 54,090 and 71,616 Belarussians.
So what are the facts?
Covid Deaths and Belarus
The population of Belarus is around 9.5million. Of this population, as of December 12, 2020, a total of 1,263 deaths are recorded as being from Covid 19. It appears the first death in Belarus attributed to this disease was Mar 31, with between 2 and 11 deaths recorded each day up until Dec.12.
It goes without saying that 1,263 deaths out of a population of 9.5m is minuscule and hardly indicative of a deadly pandemic sweeping the country. But critics of the Belarussian approach may claim that Lukashenka is hiding the reality of Covid 19 deaths in the country.
The most logical way to examine this question is to look at whether there are any excess deaths in Belarus in general over this period, and if so, how many.
Of course, just because there were excess deaths would not prove that the deaths were caused – or otherwise – by hidden cases of Covid 19. But a relatively low number of excess deaths would reveal that the claim that Lukashenka is hiding mass deaths from Covid 19 is not plausible.
According to the data, there were some excess deaths in Belarus in the second quarter of 2020 (April, May and June). 35,858 died in Belarus during this period, 5606 higher than in 2019.
Examining the data, we can see that the vast majority of these excess deaths were in June, with virtually none in April and a small excess in May.
This figure is rather small compared with the predictions of doom and destruction put forward by the likes of Neil Ferguson.
Belarus vs England and Wales
A comparison with another country that did pursue lockdowns gives further evidence that the scaremongering predictions regarding the consequences of not locking down are unfounded.
This analysis was performed by taking the number of excess deaths for Belarus and then calculating the same figures for England and Wales from the weekly death data from 2019 and 2020. Belarus had 5605 excess deaths in April, May and June 2020 from a population of 9.5 million.
England and Wales had 54,798 excess deaths in the same period from a population of 59.5 million.
The population of England and Wales is 6.26 times larger than that of Belarus, so dividing the 54,798 figure by 6.26 gives a result of 8754.
If Belarus had the same excess death rate as England and Wales another 3,149 deaths in Belarus would have been observed. Or to phrase this data another way, if England and Wales had the same excess death rate as Belarus, there would have been 19,711 fewer deaths over the period.
Sweden: No Hard Lockdowns, Masks, Or Social Distancing And One Of The Lowest COVID-19 Fatality Rate In Europe
The BMJ’s article on Belarus: Saving the Case for Lockdowns?
This evidence looks damning for lockdown supporters. However, there is one attempt to explain the low Belarus death rate despite the fact that there was no lockdown there, printed in the British Medical Journal.
The article puts forward four reasons why Belarus has a low death rate, some of which offer comparative data with the UK.
The first reason given in the article is that Belarus has a much higher amount of beds per capita – 11 per 1000 as opposed to the UK’s 2.5 per 1000.
Health services generally strike a balance between having enough beds available to deal with a crisis, and not so many that money is being wasted on unnecessary beds. The argument can be made that the NHS gets the balance wrong and leans towards having too few beds per capita.
For example, the UK had a large number of flu cases in the 2017-2018 season with hospitals having high bed occupancy rates.
However, bed occupancy in the UK significantly decreased due to the lockdowns and NHS policy of discharging as many patients as possible. On the 13th April, a few weeks into lockdown, acute beds were 40% unoccupied.
This hardly suggests a health service that would have been totally overwhelmed had it not locked down (for comparison, NHS beds are usually 90% full).
It may actually have been the case that the lockdown cost lives by cancelling treatment, expelling people from hospitals and promoting a fear based message that discouraged people from seeking treatment.
Another main argument of the article is that Belarus has a small number of elderly people in care homes (it has 203 per 100,000, as opposed to the UK 854 per 100,000).
It is true that a respiratory pathogen will find it easier to spread in an environment like a care home because of the close proximity of vulnerable individuals. It is also true that the UK had a large number of care home deaths during this period.
However, the UK government policy towards care homes likely contributed at least some of the excess deaths caused during this period. People in care homes were routinely denied hospital treatment and were unable to get access to GPs.
The lack of visits by family caused many elderly patients to mentally give up and their condition deteriorated. Any deaths that resulted from this, therefore, cannot be attributed to a virus but government policy.
The argument also fails as a motivation for lockdowns. If the majority of deaths are in the fairly contained environment such as a care home, locking down the whole society, such as closing shops and sports events, is going to have no effect on transmission within that environment.
Two other reasons given in the article – the better Belarussian testing system, and the lack of interest in Belarus as a travel destination – also do not have any bearings on whether lockdowns are an effective strategy.
There is no evidence of people with a positive test but no symptoms being infectious. It follows that testing more people isn’t going to lead to fewer deaths, so this cannot explain the low Belarus death rate without a lockdown.
Belarus did carry out quarantine measures, whereas the UK continued to allow flights into the country.
The piece argues that it is easier for Belarus (than the UK) to close its borders because it is not a major travel destination, which is true, but it can’t seriously be argued that setting up quarantine measures costs more than shutting down the entire country.
Once any hypothetical virus is also present in a country in significant numbers quarantine also becomes irrelevant.
Conclusion
The Belarussian case is a significant problem for those individuals who argue that lockdowns were necessary to prevent mass deaths from the deadly Covid 19 pandemic.
The limited measures taken in Belarus meant a lower death rate than lockdown supporting England and Wales. There are also no clear arguments as to why Belarus is so unique it could go without lockdowns while other countries had them.
Given the cost to the economy and mental wellbeing of imposing lockdowns, as well as the draconian restrictions on basic liberties, these facts strongly suggest that leaders that did impose lockdowns have a case to answer from their citizens.
By Rachel Allen, Guest writer


humansarefree--2020-12-19--Pope Francis’ New World Order: The Vatican is Using a Rothschild Initiative to Reform Capitalism.

Big business may have finally found religion .
On December 8 , an alliance of finance chiefs announced the launch of the Council for Inclusive Capitalism With the Vatican .
This organization is a coalition of Fortune 500 companies affiliated with the Roman Catholic Church and operating under the guidance of Pope Francis and Cardinal Peter Turkson .
The stated goal of the Council for Inclusive Capitalism With the Vatican is “ to build a fairer , more inclusive , and sustainable economic foundation for the world ” via environmental , social , and corporate governance .
Yet the pope @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , is a scathing rebuke of free-market capitalism .
So , the true purpose of the organization is to push for a centrally planned economy — with the Vatican doing the central planning .
The council is led by a core group of 27 leaders known as the Guardians for Inclusive Capitalism .
The guardians include the ceos of Mastercard , Visa and Bank of America ; the presidents of the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation ; and many others .
Together , the council represents 200 million employees in 163 countries @ @ @ @ @ @ @ capitalization .
If the Council for Inclusive Capitalism With the Vatican were a nation , its market value would be more than the market value of the United Kingdom , but not quite as much as the market value of France .
The guardians will meet annually with Francis and Turkson to receive guidance on how to reform capitalism .
“ An economic system that is fair , trustworthy , and capable of addressing the most profound challenges facing humanity and our planet is urgently needed , ” the pope said at their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up the challenge by seeking ways to make capitalism become a more inclusive instrument for integral human well-being.
” Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild is one of the Guardians for Inclusive Capitalism .
She is the founder and managing partner for the Council for Inclusive Capitalism With the Vatican .
Lady Rothschild is a member of the United States Democratic Party .
She married Sir Evelyn Robert de Rothschild , a British financier , shortly after being introduced to him by Henry Kissinger at a 1998 Bilderberg Group conference in Scotland .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Clinton , who invited the Rothschilds to honeymoon at the White House .
Like the Clintons and Rothschilds , Pope Francis espouses an economic philosophy often called state capitalism , but which used to be called corporatism .
While pure socialism is direct government control with no intermediaries , corporatism allows private enterprise but manages it via connected swathes of the economy called corporations .
Grieved by what he saw as the twin evils of capitalism and communism , Pope Leo xiii penned an encyclical , Revum Novarum , in 1891 describing Catholic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a cruel illusion ; people are happiest when placed in a hierarchy guided by the Roman Catholic Church .
Competition is spiritually demeaning .
Therefore business , labor and the state must work together in corporations .
These corporations control the economy by setting quotas , prices and wages .
They regulate individual behavior to protect the social order and supposedly provide a just standard of living for all .
Abuses of power would allegedly be prevented by the moral guidance and advice of a Roman Catholic elite .
Randall Morck and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Society article titled “ Corporatism and the Ghost of the Third Way.
” “ The church safeguards souls , and must retain power over all matters it judges necessary to this end , but should leave other matters to the prince , ” they wrote .
“ The prince retains power he deems necessary for governing his realm , but other matters subside to the corporations .
These retain powers they deem necessary to setting their just wages , prices and quotas , but other matters subside to the industrialists .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to govern their businesses , but details subside to shop foremen .
These charge master tradesmen with task , but leave them to get on with it , and so on down to the lowest worker — who is still master in his house , and due unquestioning obedience from his wife and children.
” This system is basically Industrial Age feudalism , but it is the system the Council for Inclusive Capitalism With the Vatican is trying to set up .
The guardians regulate “ just wages , prices and quotas , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the pope and the Prefect of the Dicastery for the Promotion of Integral Human Development .
To understand how this system will ultimately work , look no further than Communist China .
Even though China is an atheist state with a rocky relationship with the Catholic Church , the chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences has praised Communist China as the world ’ s “ best implementer of Catholic social doctrine.
” That is because ever since its economic liberalization reforms in the 1970s , China has become a mixed economy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ capitalist theory .
The politburo allows private enterprise but manages it in a similar way to what Pope Leo XIII described in his ecumenical .
Today , the Catholic Church has negotiated a secret concordat with China that gives the avowedly atheist regime a direct role in appointing Catholic bishops .
It has done this in the hope that the deal will pave the way for full diplomatic relations between the Vatican and the politburo of the Chinese Communist Party .
Together , these two power centers could put a lot of pressure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reform capitalism .
Philadelphia Trumpet editor in chief Gerald Flurry wrote in “ Why Bill Clinton Got the Charlemagne Prize , ” that many “ British and American leaders have actually helped build a modern resurrection of the Holy Roman Empire.
” When he was the president of the United States , Clinton wanted to build up a power in Europe and was the one who gave Germany the American firepower to conquer the Balkan states .
And many of Bill and Hillary Clinton ’ s contacts in the Bilderberg Group and other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to reform American capitalism into something more like China ’ s mixed economy .
The Council for Inclusive Capitalism , the China concordat and the pope ’ s meddling in American politics all have a common theme : They are bids to restore the Holy Roman Empire !
The Unholy Trinity Of Globalist Control : The Vatican , The City Of London & Washington D.C. Bible prophecy describes a great church in the end time that holds significant political influence with “ the kings of the earth.
” It has special power over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ terms as a “ beast ” ( Revelation 17 ) .
This description can only apply to one church in modern history — a church that meddles in the affairs of nations and considers itself mother to all — a church aligned with the Holy Roman Empire .
Many prophecies reveal what this church will do in the time just ahead of us .
In Isaiah 47 , for example , God calls this church the “ daughter of Babylon ” and the “ lady of kingdoms.
” Verse 6 of this chapter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ — speaking of the modern-day nations descended from ancient Israel , more specifically the United States and Britain — over to this “ lady of kingdoms ” because of their many sins .
Catholic leaders are making economic and political deals around the world to blot out free-market capitalism and its primary defender — the United States of America .
If the pope can bring America ’ s enemies — foreign and domestic — into an economic alliance against the U.S. , people will learn what it means to be victims of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Bible prophesies concerning the Vatican ’ s concordats with “ the kings of the earth , ” please read Who or What Is the Prophetic Beast ?
, by Herbert W. Armstrong .

Big business may have finally found religion. On December 8, an alliance of finance chiefs announced the launch of the Council for Inclusive Capitalism With the Vatican.
by Andrew Miller
This organization is a coalition of Fortune 500 companies affiliated with the Roman Catholic Church and operating under the guidance of Pope Francis and Cardinal Peter Turkson.
The stated goal of the Council for Inclusive Capitalism With the Vatican is “to build a fairer, more inclusive, and sustainable economic foundation for the world” via environmental, social, and corporate governance.
Yet the pope’s latest encyclical, Fratelli Tutti, is a scathing rebuke of free-market capitalism. So, the true purpose of the organization is to push for a centrally planned economy — with the Vatican doing the central planning.
The council is led by a core group of 27 leaders known as the Guardians for Inclusive Capitalism. The guardians include the ceos of Mastercard, Visa and Bank of America; the presidents of the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation; and many others.
Together, the council represents 200 million employees in 163 countries and has $2.1 trillion in market capitalization. If the Council for Inclusive Capitalism With the Vatican were a nation, its market value would be more than the market value of the United Kingdom, but not quite as much as the market value of France.
The guardians will meet annually with Francis and Turkson to receive guidance on how to reform capitalism.
“An economic system that is fair, trustworthy, and capable of addressing the most profound challenges facing humanity and our planet is urgently needed,” the pope said at their inaugural meeting.
“You have taken up the challenge by seeking ways to make capitalism become a more inclusive instrument for integral human well-being.”
Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild is one of the Guardians for Inclusive Capitalism. She is the founder and managing partner for the Council for Inclusive Capitalism With the Vatican.
Lady Rothschild is a member of the United States Democratic Party. She married Sir Evelyn Robert de Rothschild, a British financier, shortly after being introduced to him by Henry Kissinger at a 1998 Bilderberg Group conference in Scotland. The couple is friends with Bill and Hillary Clinton, who invited the Rothschilds to honeymoon at the White House.
Like the Clintons and Rothschilds, Pope Francis espouses an economic philosophy often called state capitalism, but which used to be called corporatism.
While pure socialism is direct government control with no intermediaries, corporatism allows private enterprise but manages it via connected swathes of the economy called corporations.
Grieved by what he saw as the twin evils of capitalism and communism, Pope Leo xiii penned an encyclical, Revum Novarum, in 1891 describing Catholic corporatism. Its premise was that equality is a cruel illusion; people are happiest when placed in a hierarchy guided by the Roman Catholic Church.
Competition is spiritually demeaning. Therefore business, labor and the state must work together in corporations. These corporations control the economy by setting quotas, prices and wages. They regulate individual behavior to protect the social order and supposedly provide a just standard of living for all.
Abuses of power would allegedly be prevented by the moral guidance and advice of a Roman Catholic elite.
Randall Morck and Bernard Yeung summarize corporatism in a Capitalism and Society article titled “Corporatism and the Ghost of the Third Way.”
“The church safeguards souls, and must retain power over all matters it judges necessary to this end, but should leave other matters to the prince,” they wrote.
“The prince retains power he deems necessary for governing his realm, but other matters subside to the corporations. These retain powers they deem necessary to setting their just wages, prices and quotas, but other matters subside to the industrialists.
“Industrialists retain such powers as they need to govern their businesses, but details subside to shop foremen. These charge master tradesmen with task, but leave them to get on with it, and so on down to the lowest worker — who is still master in his house, and due unquestioning obedience from his wife and children.”
This system is basically Industrial Age feudalism, but it is the system the Council for Inclusive Capitalism With the Vatican is trying to set up. The guardians regulate “just wages, prices and quotas,” but under the overall guidance of the pope and the Prefect of the Dicastery for the Promotion of Integral Human Development.
To understand how this system will ultimately work, look no further than Communist China.
Even though China is an atheist state with a rocky relationship with the Catholic Church, the chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences has praised Communist China as the world’s “best implementer of Catholic social doctrine.”
That is because ever since its economic liberalization reforms in the 1970s, China has become a mixed economy that uses parts of both Communist and capitalist theory. The politburo allows private enterprise but manages it in a similar way to what Pope Leo XIII described in his ecumenical.
Today, the Catholic Church has negotiated a secret concordat with China that gives the avowedly atheist regime a direct role in appointing Catholic bishops. It has done this in the hope that the deal will pave the way for full diplomatic relations between the Vatican and the politburo of the Chinese Communist Party.
Together, these two power centers could put a lot of pressure on Europe and the United States to reform capitalism.
Philadelphia Trumpet editor in chief Gerald Flurry wrote in “Why Bill Clinton Got the Charlemagne Prize,” that many “British and American leaders have actually helped build a modern resurrection of the Holy Roman Empire.”
When he was the president of the United States, Clinton wanted to build up a power in Europe and was the one who gave Germany the American firepower to conquer the Balkan states. And many of Bill and Hillary Clinton’s contacts in the Bilderberg Group and other trans-Atlantic organizations are working with the Vatican to reform American capitalism into something more like China’s mixed economy.
The Council for Inclusive Capitalism, the China concordat and the pope’s meddling in American politics all have a common theme: They are bids to restore the Holy Roman Empire!
The Unholy Trinity Of Globalist Control: The Vatican, The City Of London & Washington D.C.
Bible prophecy describes a great church in the end time that holds significant political influence with “the kings of the earth.” It has special power over a union of nations described in symbolic terms as a “beast” (Revelation 17).
This description can only apply to one church in modern history — a church that meddles in the affairs of nations and considers itself mother to all — a church aligned with the Holy Roman Empire.
Many prophecies reveal what this church will do in the time just ahead of us.
In Isaiah 47, for example, God calls this church the “daughter of Babylon” and the “lady of kingdoms.” Verse 6 of this chapter prophesies that God will deliver His people — speaking of the modern-day nations descended from ancient Israel, more specifically the United States and Britain — over to this “lady of kingdoms” because of their many sins.
Catholic leaders are making economic and political deals around the world to blot out free-market capitalism and its primary defender — the United States of America. If the pope can bring America’s enemies — foreign and domestic — into an economic alliance against the U.S., people will learn what it means to be victims of the Holy Roman Empire!
To learn what the Bible prophesies concerning the Vatican’s concordats with “the kings of the earth,” please read Who or What Is the Prophetic Beast?, by Herbert W. Armstrong.


humansarefree--2020-12-19--El Paso, Texas News Station Showed a Health Care Worker Receiving a Fake COVID-19 Vaccination

Footage aired on a local El Paso , Texas news station showed a health care worker receiving a COVID-19 vaccination @ @ @ @ @ already pressed before the syringe penetrated their skin .
KTSM 9 originally aired the footage @ @ @ @ @ played the clip again on Wednesday after viewers noticed the phantom vaccination .
“ You @ @ @ @ @ care worker with his sleeve rolled up , but when it comes time for the @ @ @ @ @ of the syringe , ” a KTSM 9 anchor explained .
“ It appears the @ @ @ @ @ not press down on the plunger .
It actually looks like the plunger is already @ @ @ @ @ whether the worker received the vaccine at all.
” Last year , Infowars covered a @ @ @ @ @ Canada ’ s Health Minister Christine Elliot was allegedly caught pretending to get a flu @ @ @ @ @ a product designed to fake vaccinations using a retractable syringe .
If the vaccine is @ @ @ @ @ people seeming to fake administering it ?

At the start of this ‘pandemic’ I read about four separate experiments/ investigations carried out by the US Military during the Spanish Flu, all of which demonstrated that the Spanish Flu could not be passed from very sick to healthy persons, even by getting the healthy to drink the warm sputum of the sick.
I wondered why no similar investigation was being conducted into the transmission of COVID19. Such experiments would not have to be so ‘gross’.
Furthermore. It’s not like this is an issue of no importance.
I sent FOI requests to the Department of Health and Social Care who, in a first reply (to the question of isolation of the virus), admitted that they held “no information relating to the isolation of Sars-Cov-2”, a pretty astonishing statement the elevates Sars-Cov-2 to the same mythical status as that of the unicorn, an extraordinary thing that no one has ever seen.
The main difference between a unicorn and Sars-Cov-2 is that no one has yet invented a “scientific” test of supposed constituent parts that “proves” the existence of a unicorn, which is a great shame as it would be quite something to observe how many people would be convinced if a ‘unicorn test’ ever returned a ‘positive’.
The DHSC also held no information about transmissibility/ contagion but suggested I sent my request to Public Health England.
PHE has replied (at last).
Here are the relevant lines:
Please could you forward any information you have relating to experimental evidence demonstrating that COVID-19 is person-to-person transmissible. PHE can confirm it does not hold information in the way specified by your request.
What this means is that no specific investigation has been carried out into the most central assumption (and that’s all it is) that has driven the global “response” to this supposed pandemic!
It would quite obviously be a straightforward issue to prove or disprove contagion (i.e. contagion-via-transmitted-droplet) experimentally. There is NO EXCUSE for not investigating this directly. Science could easily resolve contradicting beliefs about this, one way or the other.
In my opinion, it already has done. That’s why the failure to investigate is, in itself, evidence of bad faith and the enforcement of a diabolical lie.
Scientific papers that demonstrate the uselessness of lockdowns and mask-wearing in protecting people against COVID ‘infection’ offer further indirect evidence that flu-like illnesses are NOT person-to-person transmissible. This is simply not how such illnesses work. Other factors, external and internal, define who becomes ill and when.
Here was my second FOI request:
If no such experimental evidence exists for COVID-19 please could you forward any available evidence collected, targeting this particular issue over the past 150 years, that demonstrates person-to-person transmissibility for any other influenza type illness?”
Reply:
PHE can confirm it does hold this information. However, the information is exempt under section 21 of the FOI Act because it is reasonably accessible by other means, and the terms of the exemption mean that we do not have to consider whether or not it would be in the public interest for you to have the information. However, for your convenience we have included a link to the report ‘Impact of mass gatherings on Influenza.’
The first part of the response indicates, in my opinion, that PHE are admitting that they hold or are aware of the scientific evidence collected during the Spanish Flu (that used to be online in ‘The US Surgeon General’s Report 1919 [which disappeared from the document last October]).
By referring to not having to consider “whether or not it is in the public interest” that they release this information they are covertly admitting that they know the investigation demonstrated non-contagion and that it might be “in the public interest” that we be told this.
In fact, under our new global ‘Communitarian’ system (yes, we’re already in it folks) what is defined as “the public interest” is decided by rulers …. as anyone with a brain should realise by now.
Truth, or even what we understand as the public interest (i.e. the common good) has nothing to do with anything any more … as American voters recently found out the hard way.
The linked report, in my opinion, has little to do with my FOI request. The weak ‘conclusion’ of “The impact of mass gatherings on Influenza” suggests correlation without demonstrating proof of anything at all. The probabilities suggested in the Conclusion are, yet again, based on assumptions that the author does not even care to define.
Correlation between future infection and mass gatherings without investigation of other factors inherent to mass gatherings (e.g. everyone being in approximately the same place and therefore subject to multiple identical environmental influences at the same time) surely means nothing scientifically. The report admits there is no proof of causation but suggests it is “prudent” to discourage them.
Why, one wonders, does it not suggest it would be prudent to investigate the scientific community’s own primary assumption, that these illnesses are in any way contagious at all?
See this link to the full document.
Here is its ‘conclusion’.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion there is limited data indicating that mass gatherings are associated with influenza transmission and this theme is continued with the inclusion of new evidence for the update.
Certain unique events such as the Hajj, specialised settings including civilian and military ships- a new theme for this update, indoor venues and crowded outdoor venues provide the primary evidence base to suggest mass gatherings can be associated with Influenza outbreaks.
Some evidence suggests that restricting mass gatherings together with other social distancing measures may help to reduce transmission. However, the evidence is still not strong enough to warrant advocating legislated restrictions.
Therefore, in a pandemic situation a cautious policy of voluntary avoidance of mass gatherings would is still the most prudent message. Operational considerations including practical implications of policy directed at restricting mass gathering events should be carefully considered.
After reading the entirety of the FOI response, here is my own conclusion:
PHE admits that government’s assumption of human-to-human transmissibility of COVID-19 is based on … NO SCIENCE AT ALL!
NONE!
ZERO!
ZILCH!
Source and reference: KevBoyle.blogspot.com; Assets.publishing.service.gov.uk [pdf]


humansarefree--2020-12-20--What Made George Soros Think He Can Count on U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts to Help Him Destroy Nat

What Made George Soros Think He Can Count on U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts to Help Him Destroy Nationalism?

These past few weeks the dysfunction of the Supreme Court has come to a head .
The Court , led by Chief John Roberts , has removed itself from getting involved in the 2020 election .
The manner in which Chief Justice Roberts runs the Supreme Court is a travesty .
It is corrupt .
He doesn ’ t uphold the rule of law , he breaks it .
A week ago the Supreme Court threw out the Texas case which more than 20 states joined in support .
This was the first case on the 2020 election based on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the three new Trump judges would not vote to hear the case .
This decision led legal legend Lin Wood to share the following tweet : The name “ Jon Roberts ” appears in Jeffrey Epstein ’ s flight log : Wood also tweeted about suspicions of Roberts ’ illegal adoption in Ireland : [ Legitimate question : why do so many public figures adopt children ?
Is there something more to this ? ]
Turning down the Texas case was not the first questionable act made by Roberts .
In October Roberts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to count non- post-marked ballots three days after the election .
In June , Roberts sided with the liberal judges over ending unconstitutional DACA .
During the garbage impeachment hearings Roberts refused to allow the name of the so called ‘ whistleblower ’ from being spoken out loud during the hearings .
In 2018 Roberts lashed out at President Trump for pointing out how insane , corrupt and unconstitutional the Obama judges are .
Roberts is a mess .
Jennifer Lawrence on Twitter pointed out the following about Roberts – that George Soros @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The good news is Roberts no longer is the fifth vote to steal rulings away from the people and for the lunatic liberals .
Now we just need to the court to hear our cases .
Roberts should resign – no more Soros puppets on the Supreme Court :

These past few weeks the dysfunction of the Supreme Court has come to a head. The Court, led by Chief John Roberts, has removed itself from getting involved in the 2020 election.
Something’s not right.
The manner in which Chief Justice Roberts runs the Supreme Court is a travesty. It is corrupt. He doesn’t uphold the rule of law, he breaks it.
A week ago the Supreme Court threw out the Texas case which more than 20 states joined in support. This was the first case on the 2020 election based on its merits. It was shocking that the three new Trump judges would not vote to hear the case.
This decision led legal legend Lin Wood to share the following tweet:
The People have list of questions for C.J. Roberts based on bizarre votes on major cases starting with Obamacare. But let’s ask him just two: 1. Are you the John Roberts on Epstein flight logs?
2. Did you say about @realDonaldTrump “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.” — Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 18, 2020
The name “Jon Roberts” appears in Jeffrey Epstein’s flight log:
4: Was he the "John Roberts" who appeared in the Epstein flight logs? Based on his odd rulings against the Constitution I think the question at least needs to be asked. pic.twitter.com/MZa4tC8W5T — Jennifer Lynn Lawrence (@JenLawrence21) November 26, 2020
Wood also tweeted about suspicions of Roberts’ illegal adoption in Ireland:
U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts is corrupt. https://t.co/TMMMApfHsF — Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 18, 2020
[Legitimate question: why do so many public figures adopt children? Is there something more to this?]
Turning down the Texas case was not the first questionable act made by Roberts. In October Roberts sided with Pennsylvania and allowed the state to count non- post-marked ballots three days after the election.
In June, Roberts sided with the liberal judges over ending unconstitutional DACA. During the garbage impeachment hearings Roberts refused to allow the name of the so called ‘whistleblower’ from being spoken out loud during the hearings.
In 2018 Roberts lashed out at President Trump for pointing out how insane, corrupt and unconstitutional the Obama judges are. Roberts is a mess.
Jennifer Lawrence on Twitter pointed out the following about Roberts – that George Soros says he can count on Roberts:
1: Does anyone else find it strange that George Soros seems to think that he can count on John Roberts to help him destroy nationalism? Don't take my word for it, here he is at Davos in January where he fanboys the Chief Justice, twice pic.twitter.com/twyTf8SWl1 — Jennifer Lynn Lawrence (@JenLawrence21) November 26, 2020
Roberts also sided against religious liberty:
1: Does anyone else find it strange that George Soros seems to think that he can count on John Roberts to help him destroy nationalism? Don't take my word for it, here he is at Davos in January where he fanboys the Chief Justice, twice pic.twitter.com/twyTf8SWl1 — Jennifer Lynn Lawrence (@JenLawrence21) November 26, 2020
The good news is Roberts no longer is the fifth vote to steal rulings away from the people and for the lunatic liberals. Now we just need to the court to hear our cases.
8: Fearless warriors like @SidneyPowell1 and @LLinWood seem headed to SCOTUS in the battle to expose the globalist plot to steal the election from @realDonaldTrump. We should all be very grateful that Roberts' vote is no longer necessary to uphold the Constitution. Thank God! — Jennifer Lynn Lawrence (@JenLawrence21) November 26, 2020
Roberts should resign – no more Soros puppets on the Supreme Court:
It is time for Chief Justice John Roberts to resign, admit his corruption & ask for forgiveness. Roberts has betrayed his sacred oath office. He has betrayed his country. He has betrayed We The People. — Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 19, 2020
By Joe Hoft, Guest writer


humansarefree--2020-12-20--Simple Math: Biden Claims 13 MILLION More Votes Than There Were Eligible Voters Who Voted in 2020 El

Simple Math: Biden Claims 13 MILLION More Votes Than There Were Eligible Voters Who Voted in 2020 Election

The 2020 election will go down as the most corrupt US election in history .
It was corrupted in so many ways !
Bill Binney , of US Intel fame tweeted out a message yesterday noting that more people voted in the 2020 election nation-wide than were eligible to vote .
What Binney points out is that according to the Washington Post , 2020 had the highest voter turnout in over a century : Of course this on its face value implies fraud since no one was excited about voting for Joe Biden , but the WaPo wouldn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ far-left extreme bias .
Binney attaches a link to the number of registered voters in the US .
We made a copy as of today and added these voters up .
When we add up the number of registered voters we obtain 213.8 million registered voters in the US as of this morning .
Using the numbers as of today , which are materially similar to Binney ’ s , we find a huge issue .
If we have 213.8 million registered voters in the US and 66.2 % of all voters voted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 141.5 voters who voted in the 2020 election ( Binney shows 140 million which is materially the same ) .
If President Trump won 74 million votes , then that leaves only 67.5 million votes remaining for Biden .
This means 13 million duplicate or made up ballots were created and counted for Biden !
Statistician In Texas Lawsuit On Joe Biden Winning All 4 States Collectively : ‘ The Odds Are Less Than One In A Quadrillion To The Fourth Power ’ This also supports our observations from the start .
Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but the big steal was in millions of fraudulent votes that were created to steal the election for Biden .
MILLIONS !
The result of the 2020 election at a very high level do not add up .
This is math – very simple math .
At a high level , the Biden camp clearly committed fraud .

Despite massive leaps and bounds in technology and quality of life across the planet, there is still a very dark problem and it is hiding in plain sight. Slavery. According to the most recent data, there are over 40 million people in slavery with 1 in 4 of them being children. Its scope is massive and so are its profits — raking in around $150 billion annually.
A recent article published in Psychology Today lays out an ominous picture on the state of the free world. “Never before in human history have this many people been enslaved,” write Jenny Hwang and Shayne Moore in their report on the heart-rending data about child trafficking.
In the US, child trafficking is a growing problem in all 50 states. Children, young girls — some as young as 9 years old — are being bought and sold for sex in America. The average age for a young woman being sold for sex is now 13 years old.
Sex trafficking — especially when it comes to the buying and selling of young girls — has become big business in America, the fastest growing business in organized crime and the second most-lucrative commodity traded illegally after drugs and guns.
As investigative journalist Amy Fine Collins notes, “It’s become more lucrative and much safer to sell malleable teens than drugs or guns. A pound of heroin or an AK-47 can be retailed once, but a young girl can be sold 10 to 15 times a day — and a ‘righteous’ pimp confiscates 100 percent of her earnings.”
Shockingly enough, the research shows the majority of sex trafficked children in North America (US and Canada) come from government welfare programs. The authors of this research project note that domestic sex trafficking is a growing crime in Canada, and the majority of victims are children and youth who are or were in the Child Welfare (CW) system. It is the same in the United States too.
While many think that the state taking children from parents is a noble gesture to protect the child, all too often, the state removes kids from a bad situation and throws them into a situation akin to a horror film. Many times the children are taken from caring parents, who happened to hit a rough patch in their lives, and thrown into torturous and outright sadistic situations where they end up raped, tortured, and even murdered.
According to the government’s own data, the vast majority of a portion of these trafficked kids are coming from the government system who promises to keep them safe — a horrifying irony indeed. But it appears to be set up this way.
This system is set up to pull children from their families for ridiculous reasons and turn them over to for profit systems — funded by your tax dollars — that use these children as cash cows and have no incentive to keep them safe.
In 1984, the United States Congress established the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC), and, as part of Missing Children’s Assistance Reauthorization Act of 2013 they receive $40 million to study and track missing and trafficked children in the United States.
In 2019, NCMEC assisted law enforcement with over 23,500 cases of missing children, all of whom were considered endangered runaways.
According to their most recent report complied from FBI data and their own, of the nearly 24,000 runaways reported to NCMEC in 2019, one in six were likely victims of child sex trafficking. Of those, 88 percent were in the care of social services when they went missing.
Foster Care Continues To Be Child Sex Trafficking Pipeline In 2020
Showing the scope of the abuse, in 2017 alone, NCMEC’s CyberTipline, a national mechanism for the public and electronic service providers to report instances of suspected child sexual exploitation, received over 10 million reports. According to NCMEC, most of these tips were related to the following:
Apparent child sexual abuse images.
Online enticement, including “sextortion.”
Child sex trafficking.
Child sexual molestation.
Other governmental organizations have corroborated this horrifying trend. In a 2013 FBI 70-city nationwide raid, 60 percent of the victims came from foster care or group homes. In 2014, New York authorities estimated that 85 percent of sex trafficking victims were previously in the child welfare system. In 2012, Connecticut police rescued 88 children from sex trafficking; 86 were from the child welfare system.
Attorney Reporting In Newsweek Claims: Foster Care Is A System Set Up To Sex Traffic American Children
Equally as disturbing as the fact that most sex trafficked kids come from within the system is the fact that the FBI discovered in a 2014 nationwide raid that many foster children rescued from sex traffickers, including children as young as 11, were never reported missing by child welfare authorities.
Even high-level government officials have been ensnared in these foster care abuse scandals. As TFTP previously reported, multiple victims came forward and accused Seattle Mayor Ed Murray of sexually abusing them when they were children in Washington’s foster care system.
The records in that case, dating back to 1984, explicitly noted that Ed Murray should “never again be utilized as a certified CSD resource for children.” It also showed that a criminal case was brought against Murray by prosecutors but in spite of the multiple accusations, charges were somehow never filed and his records buried.
While there are certainly some outlandish theories being presented online, the facts of child trafficking are outlandish enough to warrant serious scrutiny. Until this epidemic is taken seriously, the government, the media, and all those who deny it will remain complicit in keeping it going.
As Michael Dolce, who specializes in these horrific child abuse cases, pointed out last year, “we have set up a system to sex traffic American children.” Indeed.
Reference: Thefreethoughtproject.com


humansarefree--2020-12-20--These People Crazy! IMF Says Your Search History Will Determine Your Financial Credit Score In Futur

These People Crazy! IMF Says Your Search History Will Determine Your Financial Credit Score In Future

A new white paper by the IMF calls for linking your search history to your financial credit score , which would in effect lower your score if you visit websites marked harmful by their fact-checkers .
In a new blog post for the International Monetary Fund , four researchers presented their findings from a working paper ( read below ) that examines the current relationship between finance and tech as well as its potential future .
The researchers propose using the data from your browsing , search , and purchase history to create a mechanism for determining the credit rating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ plan is outlined in a blog written by Arnoud Boot , Peter Hoffmann , Luc Laeven and Lev Ratnovski , pitching the Orwellian notion as a breakthrough in financial technology ( Fintech ) .
Fintech resolves the dilemma by tapping various nonfinancial data : the type of browser and hardware used to access the internet , the history of online searches and purchases .
Recent research documents that , once powered by artificial intelligence and machine learning , these alternative data sources are often superior than traditional credit assessment methods , and can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ much of the technological progress in finance is evolutionary , its pace is accelerating fast .
Fintech ’ s potential to reach out to over a billion unbanked people around the world , and the changes in the financial system structure that this can induce , can be revolutionary .
Governments should follow and carefully support the technological transition in finance .
It is important to adjust policies accordingly and stay ahead of the curve .
Also read : China ’ s Sesame Credit Is Controlling Citizens Based On How Obedient & Conformist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and its mortifying consequences if it were actually implemented on a grand scale .
The researchers acknowledge that there will be privacy and policy concerns related to incorporating this kind of soft-data into credit analysis .
And they do little to explain how this might work in practice .
The paper isn ’ t long , and it ’ s worth a read just to wrap your mind around some of the notions of fintech ’ s future and why everyone seems to want in on the payments game .
As it is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would probably require companies like Facebook and Apple to loosen up their standards on linking unencrypted information with individual accounts .
How they might share information with other institutions would be its own can of worms .
However , the policy seems to be designed to bring an end to alternate news media with grave consequences for those engaged with the organisation .

A new white paper by the IMF calls for linking your search history to your financial credit score, which would in effect lower your score if you visit websites marked harmful by their fact-checkers.
In a new blog post for the International Monetary Fund, four researchers presented their findings from a working paper (read below) that examines the current relationship between finance and tech as well as its potential future.
The researchers propose using the data from your browsing, search, and purchase history to create a mechanism for determining the credit rating of an individual or business.
The plan is outlined in a blog written by Arnoud Boot, Peter Hoffmann, Luc Laeven and Lev Ratnovski, pitching the Orwellian notion as a breakthrough in financial technology (Fintech).
Fintech resolves the dilemma by tapping various nonfinancial data: the type of browser and hardware used to access the internet, the history of online searches and purchases.
Recent research documents that, once powered by artificial intelligence and machine learning, these alternative data sources are often superior than traditional credit assessment methods, and can advance financial inclusion.
Overall, while much of the technological progress in finance is evolutionary, its pace is accelerating fast. Fintech’s potential to reach out to over a billion unbanked people around the world, and the changes in the financial system structure that this can induce, can be revolutionary.
Governments should follow and carefully support the technological transition in finance. It is important to adjust policies accordingly and stay ahead of the curve.
Also read: China’s Sesame Credit Is Controlling Citizens Based On How Obedient & Conformist They Are
Gizmodo commented on the proposal and its mortifying consequences if it were actually implemented on a grand scale.
The researchers acknowledge that there will be privacy and policy concerns related to incorporating this kind of soft-data into credit analysis. And they do little to explain how this might work in practice.
The paper isn’t long, and it’s worth a read just to wrap your mind around some of the notions of fintech’s future and why everyone seems to want in on the payments game.
As it is, getting the really fine soft-data points would probably require companies like Facebook and Apple to loosen up their standards on linking unencrypted information with individual accounts. How they might share information with other institutions would be its own can of worms.
However, the policy seems to be designed to bring an end to alternate news media with grave consequences for those engaged with the organisation.
Source: GreatGameIndia.com