humansarefree--2020-10-20--‘Fashion Nova’ Adult Clothing Store Faces Backlash After Launching Lewd Kids Section

Fashion Nova , an adult women ’ s clothing store which has been criticized several times for selling highly revealing outfits , is now facing an onslaught of customer backlash for launching a new product line aimed at kids .
The new clothing line has been described as “ trendy fits for the stylish kid.
” However , customers on social media had a different take on the idea of dressing up kids in adults clothing .
“ No .
You will NOT have me dressing my toddler like a grown ass adult , ” said one Twitter user .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ far , these are the same people who think it ’ s cute when their kids sing WAP & shit or do the sexualized Tik Tok dances # fashionnovakids ” Many have accused the fashion company of engaging in child exploitation and sexualizing impressionable kids .
The product line even caught the attention of Georgia congressional candidate Angela Stanton King .
Last year , the company released a ‘ neon thong bikini with plastic straps ’ shoppers said was “ made for strippers.
” “ Some strippers wear more than this , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the new kids ’ clothing line not as a new division of the company , but as an extension of their usual apparel .
“ Fashion Nova took all of their regular outfits and just made them in kids size and told y ’ all here ’ s a kid friendly clothing line , ” said one user .
“ I want my child dressing like a child , not like she about to go to the club , ” another exclaimed .
On Fashion Nova ’ s official Instagram page , you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ among pictures of barely clothed adult women .
“ Pedophiles are having a field day , ” one Twitter user noted as the clothing line was launched around the same time as Netflix ’ s debut of ‘ Cuties , ’ a film highly criticized as being exploitative and borderline soft-core child porn , which one sexual assault survivor described as taking “ [ sexual abuse survivors ] back to a moment when they were abused and overtly sexualized as a child.
” Fox News describes the product line as “ outfits that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who have yet to reach their teen years , including midriff-baring tops , short skirts and dresses , and close-fitting items.
” Fashion Nova reportedly declined or did not respond to comment about accusations of sexualizing children to multiple journalists at different networks .
The clothing company originally launched in 2006 as a “ clubwear ” chain and now has a long list of celebrity “ Nova Ambassadors ” including Kourtney and Khloe Kardashian , Kylie Jenner , and rapper Cardi B , vocalist of the intensely sexual song “ WAP ” who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was called out for “ pandering ” to black voters by conservative firebrand Candace Owens .
“ [ Cardi B ’ s ] hit song encourages girls to degrade , objectivity , [ and ] prostitute themselves .
This is not empowerment , ” said commentator Matt Walsh .
“ If black Americans aren ’ t insulted by the fact that Joe Biden , who has been hiding in his basement for the entire year , made an appearance and came out because he was going to do an interview with Cardi B—do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Candace said in an interview last month with author and podcaster Ben Shapiro .
As kids in the tens of thousands will likely be wearing Fashion Nova clothes , watching Cuties on Netflix , listening to Cardi B ’ s music and reading her sexually deranged tweets , this cultural trend could be the precipice of a new status quo that may not go back to normal for years to come .
“ Blank stares , too much lip gloss , diva-ish poses , wet n wavy hair styles , large sunglasses…The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of kids .
They captured little divas .
It ’ s not cute at all , ” one Twitter user chagrined .

Fashion Nova, an adult women’s clothing store which has been criticized several times for selling highly revealing outfits, is now facing an onslaught of customer backlash for launching a new product line aimed at kids.
by Phillip Schneider
The new clothing line has been described as “trendy fits for the stylish kid.” However, customers on social media had a different take on the idea of dressing up kids in adults clothing.
“No. You will NOT have me dressing my toddler like a grown ass adult,” said one Twitter user. “This is taking it WAY to far, these are the same people who think it’s cute when their kids sing WAP & shit or do the sexualized Tik Tok dances #fashionnovakids”
No. You will NOT have me dressing my toddler like a grown ass adult. The hell. This is taking it WAY to far, these are the same people who think it’s cute when their kids sing WAP & shit 🤮 or do the sexualized Tik Tok dances #fashionnovakids — Dee Reyes (@SimplyDee_21) September 28, 2020
Many have accused the fashion company of engaging in child exploitation and sexualizing impressionable kids.
Who do we need to call to stop this exploitation and sexualization of our babies?I have been disturbed about this since I woke up and discovered it this morning. Fashion Nova you so far outta line…..Sooo disturbing.Throw the WHOLE site away.🗑 #FashionNovaKids #fashionnova pic.twitter.com/8KzaE7zHG4 — Sixxizluv79 (@jackson_sixx) September 28, 2020
The product line even caught the attention of Georgia congressional candidate Angela Stanton King.
Can we talk about @fashionnova
new clothing line for little girls? 👀 #saveourchildren pic.twitter.com/Dk20Te3ZOC — Angela Stanton King 🇺🇸 (@theangiestanton) September 28, 2020
Also read: Victoria’s Secret Style Show Debuts 5-Year-Old Girls as Lingerie Models
Last year, the company released a ‘neon thong bikini with plastic straps’ shoppers said was “made for strippers.” “Some strippers wear more than this,” notes another.
Customers have largely interpreted the new kids’ clothing line not as a new division of the company, but as an extension of their usual apparel.
“Fashion Nova took all of their regular outfits and just made them in kids size and told y’all here’s a kid friendly clothing line,” said one user. “I want my child dressing like a child, not like she about to go to the club,” another exclaimed.
On Fashion Nova’s official Instagram page, you can see children photographed in suggestive outfits among pictures of barely clothed adult women.
“Pedophiles are having a field day,” one Twitter user noted as the clothing line was launched around the same time as Netflix’s debut of ‘Cuties,’ a film highly criticized as being exploitative and borderline soft-core child porn, which one sexual assault survivor described as taking “[sexual abuse survivors] back to a moment when they were abused and overtly sexualized as a child.”
Fox News describes the product line as “outfits that some parents may find mature for girls who have yet to reach their teen years, including midriff-baring tops, short skirts and dresses, and close-fitting items.”
Fashion Nova reportedly declined or did not respond to comment about accusations of sexualizing children to multiple journalists at different networks.
The clothing company originally launched in 2006 as a “clubwear” chain and now has a long list of celebrity “Nova Ambassadors” including Kourtney and Khloe Kardashian, Kylie Jenner, and rapper Cardi B, vocalist of the intensely sexual song “WAP” who infamously interviewed presidential candidate Joe Biden and was called out for “pandering” to black voters by conservative firebrand Candace Owens.
“[Cardi B’s] hit song encourages girls to degrade, objectivity, [and] prostitute themselves. This is not empowerment,” said commentator Matt Walsh.
“If black Americans aren’t insulted by the fact that Joe Biden, who has been hiding in his basement for the entire year, made an appearance and came out because he was going to do an interview with Cardi B—do we have nothing better to offer?” Candace said in an interview last month with author and podcaster Ben Shapiro.
As kids in the tens of thousands will likely be wearing Fashion Nova clothes, watching Cuties on Netflix, listening to Cardi B’s music and reading her sexually deranged tweets, this cultural trend could be the precipice of a new status quo that may not go back to normal for years to come.
“Blank stares, too much lip gloss, diva-ish poses, wet n wavy hair styles, large sunglasses…The photo shoot did not capture the innocence of kids. They captured little divas. It’s not cute at all,” one Twitter user chagrined.


humansarefree--2020-10-21--Scientific American Issues Warning About the Confirmed (and Unknown) DANGERS of 5G

The oldest magazine in the United States , Scientific American , has issued a strong warning about the dangers of 5G technology .
Their concerns about both the known and the potential dangers of 5G carry a lot of weight because the magazine is so influential and known for its rigorous scientific standards .
In print since 1845 , Scientific American is widely considered by modern fact checkers to be pro-science and highly credible .
Public health researcher Joel M. Moskowitz of the University of California , Berkeley , says in the article that 5G is a lot more harmful @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people to believe .
He also said the same is true of Wi-Fi and cellular technology .
One of his biggest concerns is related to the fact that the FCC is reaffirming exposure limits for radio frequency radiation , or RFR , that were put in place in the 1990s long before Wi-Fi , 2G , 3G , 4G and 5G existed .
In other words , the FCC plans to maintain significantly outdated safety standards that do not take into account the increasing pile of evidence showing that it is harmful in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the exposure limits set in the ‘ 90s were mostly related to the potential effects of RFR exposure intensity .
Now , however , we know that there is a risk of cancer and other problems .
5G will introduce the use of millimeter waves , in addition to the microwaves that older cellular technologies used .
Moreover , the limited reach of 5G means cell antennas will need to be placed every 100 to 200 meters , increasing people ’ s exposure .
On top of that , new technologies in 5G @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and phased arrays , will make it difficult to measure exposure .
Short-term exposure to millimeter waves , which are absorbed by human skin and the surface layer of the cornea , can affect the nervous , cardiovascular and immune systems .
Long-term exposure could put people at risk of melanoma , ocular melanoma and sterility .
Related : The Millimeter Waves Used By 5G Will Be Highly Absorbed By The Skin Moskowitz argues that new exposure limits should be put in place that account for certain effects of signals , such @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their health and biologic impacts .
The current RFR exposure limits set by the FCC regulate the intensity of the exposure but ignore the RFR ’ s signaling properties .
Moskowitz also referred to the International EMF Scientist Appeal , which outlines how EMF impacts living beings at levels that are significantly below most guidelines .
These effects include cellular stress , rises in harmful free radicals , reproductive system changes , neurological disorders , learning and memory defects and a greater cancer risk .
Effects are also being noticed in plant and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the appeal represent the majority of scientific experts on non-ionizing radiation , who have published more than 2,000 papers and letters on the topic of EMF in professional journals among them .
Moskowitz also takes issue with the fact that many working in the telecommunications industry and the government officials who they ’ ve brought over to their side label those who point out 5G ’ s dangers as fear mongerers .
This is far from a conspiracy theory ; this position is coming from a body of legitimate scientific research .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , we believe it is our ethical responsibility to inform the public about what the peer-reviewed scientific literature tells us about the health risks from wireless radiation.
” In short , 5G can be likened to a “ global human experiment without consent.
” The very fact that Scientific American ’ s editorial board chose to print a piece that is so strongly against 5G shows that even the world ’ s most mainstream scientific publications have serious reservations about this technology – and that should be enough to make anyone question whether @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .

The oldest magazine in the United States, Scientific American, has issued a strong warning about the dangers of 5G technology.
by Cassie B.
Their concerns about both the known and the potential dangers of 5G carry a lot of weight because the magazine is so influential and known for its rigorous scientific standards.
In print since 1845, Scientific American is widely considered by modern fact checkers to be pro-science and highly credible.
Public health researcher Joel M. Moskowitz of the University of California, Berkeley, says in the article that 5G is a lot more harmful than the government and telecommunications industry want people to believe.
He also said the same is true of Wi-Fi and cellular technology.
Exposure limits are outdated
One of his biggest concerns is related to the fact that the FCC is reaffirming exposure limits for radio frequency radiation, or RFR, that were put in place in the 1990s long before Wi-Fi, 2G, 3G, 4G and 5G existed.
In other words, the FCC plans to maintain significantly outdated safety standards that do not take into account the increasing pile of evidence showing that it is harmful in many ways.
According to Moskowitz, the exposure limits set in the ‘90s were mostly related to the potential effects of RFR exposure intensity. Now, however, we know that there is a risk of cancer and other problems.
5G will introduce the use of millimeter waves, in addition to the microwaves that older cellular technologies used.
Moreover, the limited reach of 5G means cell antennas will need to be placed every 100 to 200 meters, increasing people’s exposure.
On top of that, new technologies in 5G such as beam-forming antennas, massive MIMO, and phased arrays, will make it difficult to measure exposure.
Short-term exposure to millimeter waves, which are absorbed by human skin and the surface layer of the cornea, can affect the nervous, cardiovascular and immune systems.
Long-term exposure could put people at risk of melanoma, ocular melanoma and sterility.
Related: The Millimeter Waves Used By 5G Will Be Highly Absorbed By The Skin
Moskowitz argues that new exposure limits should be put in place that account for certain effects of signals, such as polarization and pulsing, that raise their health and biologic impacts.
The current RFR exposure limits set by the FCC regulate the intensity of the exposure but ignore the RFR’s signaling properties.
Moskowitz also referred to the International EMF Scientist Appeal, which outlines how EMF impacts living beings at levels that are significantly below most guidelines.
These effects include cellular stress, rises in harmful free radicals, reproductive system changes, neurological disorders, learning and memory defects and a greater cancer risk. Effects are also being noticed in plant and animal life.
The scientists who signed the appeal represent the majority of scientific experts on non-ionizing radiation, who have published more than 2,000 papers and letters on the topic of EMF in professional journals among them.
Moskowitz also takes issue with the fact that many working in the telecommunications industry and the government officials who they’ve brought over to their side label those who point out 5G’s dangers as fear mongerers.
This is far from a conspiracy theory; this position is coming from a body of legitimate scientific research.
He said:
“Since much of our research is publicly-funded, we believe it is our ethical responsibility to inform the public about what the peer-reviewed scientific literature tells us about the health risks from wireless radiation.”
In short, 5G can be likened to a “global human experiment without consent.”
The very fact that Scientific American’s editorial board chose to print a piece that is so strongly against 5G shows that even the world’s most mainstream scientific publications have serious reservations about this technology – and that should be enough to make anyone question whether this technology should be used at all.


humansarefree--2020-10-20--Scientific Evidence Allegedly Proves Buddhist Monks Can Transform Their Physical Bodies Into Pure Li

Scientific Evidence Allegedly Proves Buddhist Monks Can Transform Their Physical Bodies Into Pure Light

Did you know that in Tibet and India alone , there are more than 160,000 documented cases of people , who after many years of spiritual preparation , allegedly manage to transform their physical body into a body of pure light / Energy ?
In order to attain a “ Rainbow Body ” , a person has to be able to liberate their body into light by having only loving thoughts , among other things of course .
It is believed that every five years on average , an advanced Buddhist monk enters into this enlightened state .
This process @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that weeks before being able to achieve this transformation , some Buddhist monks can engrave their hand or foot onto a wall .
According to reports , it takes around 7 days for a body to eventually shrink , dissolve into light and transcend .
In Sufism — or Taṣawwuf which is often defined as “ Islamic mysticism ” , “ the inward dimension of Islam ” , or “ the phenomenon of mysticism within Islam ” — it is called “ the most sacred body ” and the “ supra celestial body.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the diamond body , ” and those who have attained it are named “ the immortals ” and “ the cloud walkers.
” Yogic schools and Tantric teachings call it “ the divine body , ” while in Kriya yoga it is referred to as “ the body of bliss.
” In Vedanta , “ the superconductive body , ” while the ancient Egyptians called it “ the luminous body or being ” ( akh ) or the karast .
In the Mithraic liturgy , it was dubbed as “ the perfect body.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ is referred to as “ the immortal body , ” while in the alchemical tradition , the Emerald Tablet calls it “ the golden body.
” However , this amazing phenomenon is not exclusive to ancient times .
There are even recent testimonies about Tibetan monks who reached this state after a deep process of purification .
For example , ordained Catholic priest Francis Tiso documented the case of Khenpo Achö , a Gelugpa Monk of Kham , Tibet , who died in 1998 and how he managed to transform his body into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , a Benedictine monk proposed in 2002 a scientific investigation with the Institute of Noetic Sciences to study the so-called Body of Light , or Rainbow Body , saying that ; “ If we can establish as an anthropological fact that what is described in the resurrection of Jesus has not only happened to others but is happening today , it would put our view of human potential in a completely different light.
” Eventually , David Steindl-Rast contacted Father Francis Tiso who was known for frequently traveling to Tibet , and asked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Father Tiso said to have witnessed a rainbow appearing over Khenpo Achö ’ s house a few days before his death in September 1998 , and that dozens of rainbows appeared afterward .
Khenpo Achö ’ s body started changing soon after his last breath .
His skin turned shiny white , and his appearance began to change .
Khenpo Achö ’ s was eventually wrapped in a yellow robe which all Gelug Monks wear .
As days passed the body of Khenpo Achö started shirking .
After seven days had passed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was well-recorded by local press who gave specific accounts of what had occurred and “ The Rainbow Body , ” appeared in an Institute of Noetic Sciences Review 59 ( March–May 2002 ) .
Curiously , the rainbow body of Khenpo Achö was also mentioned by Matthew T. Kapstein in The Presence of Light : Divine Radiance and Religious Experience ( University of Chicago Press , 2004 ) .
“ Recently , on August 29 , 1998 , at Dome Khamngak in Azi Rong in Tibet , Khenpo Achö , eighty years of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ One day at noon , lying in bed , without having suffered any recent illness , while in the posture of a sleeping lion and reciting the six-syllable mantra , he attained Buddha in the primordial basic matrix of alpha-purity , his heart of clear light reality perfected beyond the intellect .
“ As his body dissolved into light , his wrinkles vanishing , he seemed like an eight-year-old child with a beautiful complexion .
“ After a week had passed , when people came to know of his death , they performed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deceive the authorities , and at that time , rainbows appeared inside and outside , and a pleasant aroma pervaded the place .
“ His body gradually diminished in size , and at the end , he attained Buddha ; not even his nails and hair were left behind .
It was just like a bird flying from a rock — people nearby have no idea where it might have gone ’ .
Buddhist master H.E .
Dzogchen Khenpo Choga Rinpoche writes of his teacher ’ s passing into a body of light @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Lama Karma Rinpoche passed away on the 11th of November , 2013 .
Yesterday I received extraordinary news from my Dharma friends in the holy Dzogchen area of Tibet that the sacred body of my kind teacher Lama Karma has obviously and dramatically shrunk in size .
“ Lama Karma ’ s body was about 175cm ( approx .
5 ’ 9 ” ) tall , but two weeks after he passed away , his seated body has now shrunk to about 20cm ( approx .
8 ” ) , which means his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nearly 80 % .
“ According to Dzogchen tantra , this kind of miraculous display shows he has attained the Small Rainbow Body , which is a sign that he has attained the supreme accomplishment of Buddha in this very life .
Please deeply rejoice in his devoted practice and realization of Dzogchen .
“ In doing so , you accumulate immeasurable merit .
If his body continues to shrink and totally disappears , then this miracle will be categorized as Light Body or Atomless Body .
I will describe these various miraculous @ @ @ @ @ @ @ message .
”

Did you know that in Tibet and India alone, there are more than 160,000 documented cases of people, who after many years of spiritual preparation, allegedly manage to transform their physical body into a body of pure light / Energy?
In order to attain a “Rainbow Body”, a person has to be able to liberate their body into light by having only loving thoughts, among other things of course.
It is believed that every five years on average, an advanced Buddhist monk enters into this enlightened state.
This process is extremely powerful and it is said that weeks before being able to achieve this transformation, some Buddhist monks can engrave their hand or foot onto a wall.
According to reports, it takes around 7 days for a body to eventually shrink, dissolve into light and transcend.
In Sufism — or Taṣawwuf which is often defined as “Islamic mysticism”, “the inward dimension of Islam”, or “the phenomenon of mysticism within Islam” — it is called “the most sacred body” and the “supra celestial body.”
Taoists refer to it as “the diamond body,” and those who have attained it are named “the immortals” and “the cloud walkers.”
Yogic schools and Tantric teachings call it “the divine body,” while in Kriya yoga it is referred to as “the body of bliss.”
In Vedanta, “the superconductive body,” while the ancient Egyptians called it “the luminous body or being” (akh) or the karast.
In the Mithraic liturgy, it was dubbed as “the perfect body.”
In the Hermetic Corpus, it is referred to as “the immortal body,” while in the alchemical tradition, the Emerald Tablet calls it “the golden body.”
However, this amazing phenomenon is not exclusive to ancient times.
There are even recent testimonies about Tibetan monks who reached this state after a deep process of purification.
For example, ordained Catholic priest Francis Tiso documented the case of Khenpo Achö, a Gelugpa Monk of Kham, Tibet, who died in 1998 and how he managed to transform his body into a body of light.
David Steindl-Rast, a Benedictine monk proposed in 2002 a scientific investigation with the Institute of Noetic Sciences to study the so-called Body of Light, or Rainbow Body, saying that;
“If we can establish as an anthropological fact that what is described in the resurrection of Jesus has not only happened to others but is happening today, it would put our view of human potential in a completely different light.”
Eventually, David Steindl-Rast contacted Father Francis Tiso who was known for frequently traveling to Tibet, and asked him to look into this incredible phenomenon.
Father Tiso said to have witnessed a rainbow appearing over Khenpo Achö’s house a few days before his death in September 1998, and that dozens of rainbows appeared afterward.
Khenpo Achö’s body started changing soon after his last breath. His skin turned shiny white, and his appearance began to change.
Khenpo Achö’s was eventually wrapped in a yellow robe which all Gelug Monks wear.
As days passed the body of Khenpo Achö started shirking. After seven days had passed, no body remained.
The event was well-recorded by local press who gave specific accounts of what had occurred and “The Rainbow Body,” appeared in an Institute of Noetic Sciences Review 59 (March–May 2002).
Curiously, the rainbow body of Khenpo Achö was also mentioned by Matthew T. Kapstein in The Presence of Light: Divine Radiance and Religious Experience(University of Chicago Press, 2004).
Tulku Pema Rigtsal, a Nepalese Monk recounts Achö’s transfiguration:
“Recently, on August 29, 1998, at Dome Khamngak in Azi Rong in Tibet, Khenpo Achö, eighty years of age, attained physical dissolution.
“One day at noon, lying in bed, without having suffered any recent illness, while in the posture of a sleeping lion and reciting the six-syllable mantra, he attained Buddha in the primordial basic matrix of alpha-purity, his heart of clear light reality perfected beyond the intellect.
“As his body dissolved into light, his wrinkles vanishing, he seemed like an eight-year-old child with a beautiful complexion.
“After a week had passed, when people came to know of his death, they performed his death puja secretly in order to deceive the authorities, and at that time, rainbows appeared inside and outside, and a pleasant aroma pervaded the place.
“His body gradually diminished in size, and at the end, he attained Buddha; not even his nails and hair were left behind. It was just like a bird flying from a rock — people nearby have no idea where it might have gone’.
Buddhist master H.E. Dzogchen Khenpo Choga Rinpoche writes of his teacher’s passing into a body of light:
“… my precious teacher Dzogchen Lama Karma Rinpoche passed away on the 11th of November, 2013. Yesterday I received extraordinary news from my Dharma friends in the holy Dzogchen area of Tibet that the sacred body of my kind teacher Lama Karma has obviously and dramatically shrunk in size.
“Lama Karma’s body was about 175cm (approx. 5’9”) tall, but two weeks after he passed away, his seated body has now shrunk to about 20cm (approx. 8”), which means his body, including his skeleton, shrank nearly 80%.
“According to Dzogchen tantra, this kind of miraculous display shows he has attained the Small Rainbow Body, which is a sign that he has attained the supreme accomplishment of Buddha in this very life. Please deeply rejoice in his devoted practice and realization of Dzogchen.
“In doing so, you accumulate immeasurable merit. If his body continues to shrink and totally disappears, then this miracle will be categorized as Light Body or Atomless Body. I will describe these various miraculous results of Dzogchen practice later in this message.”
Source: Ancient-code.com


humansarefree--2020-10-20--Dept. of Justice Files Anti-Trust Lawsuit Against Google: ‘This is a Monumental Case’

The U.S. Department of Justice ( DOJ ) has filed an anti-trust lawsuit against Google , alleging that the company has been illegally abusing its position of power online in order to create a monopoly on searching and advertising .
The lawsuit , filed only this morning , states that “ Google has willfully maintained and abused its monopoly power in general search services through anticompetitive and exclusionary distribution agreements.
” Consequently , the lawsuit seeks to “ restrain Google LLC ( Google ) from unlawfully maintaining monopolies in the markets for general search services , search advertising , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ States through anticompetitive and exclusionary practices , and to remedy the effects of this conduct.
” It additionally discloses that Google ’ s online dominance has resulted in “ a market value of $ 1 trillion and annual revenue exceeding $ 160 billion ” and that it has used “ anticompetitive tactics ” to extend “ the cornerstones of its empire.
” The case is a result of over a year long investigation , and is an attempt to challenge Google ’ s online supremacy which has been affected by abusing its position @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sherman Act .
The DOJ has been joined by 11 state attorneys general as plaintiffs in the case .
The DOJ raises numerous complaints against Google , mentioning that the tech giant has “ exclusionary agreements , including tying arrangements ” in order to “ lock up distribution channels and block rivals.
” The department also claims that Google spends billions each year ensuring that it remains the default internet browser and search engine .
Companies it pays for this include “ Apple , LG , Motorola , and Samsung… AT & T @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and UCWeb.
” As a result of this , the case states that Google “ effectively owns or controls search distribution channels accounting for roughly 80 percent of the general search queries in the United States… for nearly 90 percent of all general-search-engine queries in the United States , and almost 95 percent of queries on mobile devices.
” Furthermore , “ Google monetizes this search monopoly , ” the revenues of which it “ ‘ shares ’ with distributors in return for commitments to favor Google ’ s search engine.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ [ t ] hese enormous payments create a strong disincentive for distributors to switch ” and also “ raise barriers to entry for rivals.
” Google ’ s competitors are moreover denied “ vital distribution , scale , and product recognition—ensuring they have no real chance to challenge Google.
” According to the DOJ ’ s claims , Google employs “ distribution agreements to lock up scale [ of data ] for itself and deny it to others ” which thus “ unlawfully maintains its monopolies.
” The tech company ’ s practices @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the ruling of 2001 antitrust case , United States v. Microsoft , which found that “ anticompetitive agreements by a high-tech monopolist shutting off effective distribution channels for rivals , such as by requiring preset default status ( as Google does ) and making software undeletable ( as Google also does ) , were exclusionary and unlawful under Section 2 of the Sherman Act.
” The DOJ ’ s papers report how Google employees received specific instruction after United States v. Microsoft to avoid words which could land them in trouble in any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that “ Words matter .
Especially in antitrust law ” and thus told to “ avoid observing that Google has ‘ market power ’ in any market.
” In a statement this morning , Attorney General William Barr said : “ This is a monumental case for the Department of Justice and , more importantly , for the American consumer.
” Continuing , Barr stated that the DOJ had “ convincing evidence that Google no longer competes only on the merits but instead uses its monopoly power – and billions in monopoly profits @ @ @ @ @ @ @ search on mobile phones , browsers , and next generation devices , depriving rivals of distribution and scale.
” On top of the harm which Google ’ s actions cause to “ users , advertisers , and small businesses , ” Barr also noted that the DOJ also had wider concerns about “ online platforms ” regarding “ online child exploitation , public safety , and censorship.
” These , however , would not be covered in the lawsuit filed today as they are being dealt with separately .
Google has faced growing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of conservative websites and its manipulation of search results .
It has been exposed in its attempts to alter the outcome of the upcoming presidential election , by seeking to suppress information .
Project Veritas , which has provided much evidence of Big Tech censorship , released a video yesterday in which a Google employee described the company ’ s leftist leanings as akin to “ playing selective God .
”

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed an anti-trust lawsuit against Google, alleging that the company has been illegally abusing its position of power online in order to create a monopoly on searching and advertising.
by Michael Haynes
The lawsuit, filed only this morning, states that “Google has willfully maintained and abused its monopoly power in general search services through anticompetitive and exclusionary distribution agreements.”
Consequently, the lawsuit seeks to “restrain Google LLC (Google) from unlawfully maintaining monopolies in the markets for general search services, search advertising, and general search text advertising in the United States through anticompetitive and exclusionary practices, and to remedy the effects of this conduct.”
It additionally discloses that Google’s online dominance has resulted in “a market value of $1 trillion and annual revenue exceeding $160 billion” and that it has used “anticompetitive tactics” to extend “the cornerstones of its empire.”
The case is a result of over a year long investigation, and is an attempt to challenge Google’s online supremacy which has been affected by abusing its position in violation in Section 2 of the Sherman Act. The DOJ has been joined by 11 state attorneys general as plaintiffs in the case.
The DOJ raises numerous complaints against Google, mentioning that the tech giant has “exclusionary agreements, including tying arrangements” in order to “lock up distribution channels and block rivals.”
The department also claims that Google spends billions each year ensuring that it remains the default internet browser and search engine. Companies it pays for this include “Apple, LG, Motorola, and Samsung… AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon…Mozilla, Opera, and UCWeb.”
As a result of this, the case states that Google “effectively owns or controls search distribution channels accounting for roughly 80 percent of the general search queries in the United States… for nearly 90 percent of all general-search-engine queries in the United States, and almost 95 percent of queries on mobile devices.”
Furthermore, “Google monetizes this search monopoly,” the revenues of which it “‘shares’ with distributors in return for commitments to favor Google’s search engine.”
The DOJ makes the argument that “[t]hese enormous payments create a strong disincentive for distributors to switch” and also “raise barriers to entry for rivals.”
Google’s competitors are moreover denied “vital distribution, scale, and product recognition—ensuring they have no real chance to challenge Google.”
According to the DOJ’s claims, Google employs “distribution agreements to lock up scale [of data] for itself and deny it to others” which thus “unlawfully maintains its monopolies.”
The tech company’s practices are termed “anticompetitive” according to the ruling of 2001 antitrust case, United States v. Microsoft, which found that “anticompetitive agreements by a high-tech monopolist shutting off effective distribution channels for rivals, such as by requiring preset default status (as Google does) and making software undeletable (as Google also does), were exclusionary and unlawful under Section 2 of the Sherman Act.”
The DOJ’s papers report how Google employees received specific instruction after United States v. Microsoft to avoid words which could land them in trouble in any future antitrust case.
They were warned that “Words matter. Especially in antitrust law” and thus told to “avoid observing that Google has ‘market power’ in any market.”
In a statement this morning, Attorney General William Barr said: “This is a monumental case for the Department of Justice and, more importantly, for the American consumer.”
Continuing, Barr stated that the DOJ had “convincing evidence that Google no longer competes only on the merits but instead uses its monopoly power – and billions in monopoly profits – to lock up key pathways to search on mobile phones, browsers, and next generation devices, depriving rivals of distribution and scale.”
On top of the harm which Google’s actions cause to “users, advertisers, and small businesses,” Barr also noted that the DOJ also had wider concerns about “online platforms” regarding “online child exploitation, public safety, and censorship.” These, however, would not be covered in the lawsuit filed today as they are being dealt with separately.
Google has faced growing criticism in the wake of its censorship of conservative websites and its manipulation of search results. It has been exposed in its attempts to alter the outcome of the upcoming presidential election, by seeking to suppress information.
Project Veritas, which has provided much evidence of Big Tech censorship, released a video yesterday in which a Google employee described the company’s leftist leanings as akin to “playing selective God.”


humansarefree--2020-10-20--Court Records Show Google Gives Keyword Searches of Innocent People to Cops

Everyone reading this knows that there are few things on the internet more revealing than their internet search data .
It is for this reason that police must seek out a warrant for an actual suspect in order to obtain said data .
However , a recently unsealed court document found that government can request such data in reverse order by asking Google to disclose everyone who searched a keyword rather than for information on a known suspect .
To spell it out more clearly , authorities can simply pick a search term and construct a warrant around it without @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being a suspect in a crime , and then Google will simply hand over their data .
What could possibly go wrong ?
The court files in question that exposed this Orwellian nightmare are from the arrest of Michael Williams , an associate of singer and accused sex offender R. Kelly , for allegedly setting fire to a witness ’ car in Florida .
Authorities told Google that they needed information on all “ users who had searched the address of the residence close in time to the arson.
” As CNET reports @ @ @ @ @ @ @ IP addresses of people who searched for the arson victim ’ s address , which investigators tied to a phone number belonging to Williams .
Police then used the phone number records to pinpoint the location of Williams ’ device near the arson , according to court documents .
While this instance may not seem too intrusive to some , consider the fact of how easily the state was able to obtain search information on completely innocent people .
“ This ‘ keyword warrant ’ evades the Fourth Amendment checks on police surveillance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the executive director of the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project .
“ When a court authorizes a data dump of every person who searched for a specific term or address , it ’ s likely unconstitutional.
” The keyword warrants are similar to geofence warrants , in which police make requests to Google for data on all devices logged in at a specific area and time .
Google received 15 times more geofence warrant requests in 2018 compared with 2017 , and five times more in 2019 than 2018 .
The rise in reverse @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , according to internal emails .
Naturally , Google , whose been ensnared in controversy after controversy , released a statement claiming that they protect the privacy of its users — unless of course the government tells them to do otherwise .
“ We require a warrant and push to narrow the scope of these particular demands when overly broad , including by objecting in court when appropriate , ” Google ’ s director of law enforcement and information security , Richard Salgado , said in a statement .
“ These data demands @ @ @ @ @ @ @ warrants and a small fraction of the overall legal demands for user data that we currently receive.
” The company then declined to disclose how many keyword warrants it received in the last three years .
So much for that transparency thing .
In Illinois , warrants like the one mentioned above have already been found by federal court to be a violation of the Fourth Amendment .
Authorities in Illinois simply told Google that they needed all the historical information about what devices were at certain locations and they received all of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ countless innocent people who visited these same locations and google handed it over .
Luckily , there are still some members of government who see the ominous nature of police having such easy access to this data .
Todd Spodek , the attorney representing Williams , says he ’ s seen a bunch of these warrants over the years and worries that they could lead to the arrest of innocent people .
“ Think of the ramifications in the future if everyone who searched something in the privacy of their own home was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Spodek said .
“ Someone could be interested in how people die a certain way or how drug deals are done , and it could be misconstrued or used improperly.
” Indeed , the complete lack of probable cause in these warrants is shocking .
A tyrannical state who wanted to identify those who oppose it — peacefully — could turn over one of these keyword warrants to Google and entire activist populations could be categorical rooted out and subject to invasive searches , arrests , or worse .
While it is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it is Google who is storing in such a way that creates a unique profile on billions of users .
“ If Google stored data in a way that was truly de-identified , then they also couldn ’ t give it to the government , ” the Electronic Frontier Foundation ’ s surveillance litigation director Jennifer Lynch said .
“ Google ’ s not setting up their system or changing their practices in a way that could prevent these kinds of searches.
” In fact , they are actually building their system to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has reported , the information Facebook and other social media companies keep on its users is utterly mind-blowing , consisting of everything from text messages to liked posts , the social media giant is building profiles on billions .
However , this is nothing compared to what Google has .
Google knows where you ’ ve been Google stores your location ( if you have location tracking turned on ) every time you turn on your phone .
You can see a timeline of where you ’ ve been from the very first @ @ @ @ @ @ @ phone .
Click on THIS LINK to see your own data .
Google knows everything you ’ ve ever searched – and deleted Google stores search history across all your devices .
That can mean that , even if you delete your search history and phone history on one device , it may still have data saved from other devices .
Click on this link to see your own data : myactivity.google.com/myactivity Google has an advertisement profile of you Google creates an advertisement profile based on your information , including your location , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , interests , relationship status , possible weight ( need to lose 10lb in one day ? )
and income .
Click on this link to see your own data : google.com/settings/ads/ Google knows all the apps you use Google stores information on every app and extension you use .
They know how often you use them , where you use them , and who you use them to interact with .
That means they know who you talk to on Facebook , what countries are you speaking with , what time you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ link to see your own data : security.google.com/settings/security/permissions Google has all of your YouTube history Google stores all of your YouTube history , so they probably know whether you ’ re going to be a parent soon , if you ’ re a conservative , if you ’ re a progressive , if you ’ re Jewish , Christian , or Muslim , if you ’ re feeling depressed or suicidal , if you ’ re anorexic … Click on this link to see your own data : youtube.com/feed/history/search_history The data Google has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ documents Google offers an option to download all of the data it stores about you .
I ’ ve requested to download it and the file is 5.5GB big , which is roughly 3m Word documents .
Manage to gain access to someone ’ s Google account ?
Perfect , you have a diary of everything that person has done .
This link includes your bookmarks , emails , contacts , your Google Drive files , all of the above information , your YouTube videos , the photos you ’ ve taken on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ve bought from , the products you ’ ve bought through Google … They also have data from your calendar , your Google hangout sessions , your location history , the music you listen to , the Google books you ’ ve purchased , the Google groups you ’ re in , the websites you ’ ve created , the phones you ’ ve owned , the pages you ’ ve shared , how many steps you walk in a day … Click on this link to see your own data : google.com/takeout @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ever downloaded and where you accessed them .
They also know what events you ’ ve attended and when—even when you don ’ t enter them in your own calendar .
What ’ s more , even if you ’ ve deleted all this information , Google still has it !
But that ’ s not all .
They also have every email you ’ ve ever sent and received , including deleted ones and spam .
The have a record of every single website you ’ ve ever visited , every search @ @ @ @ @ @ @ app you ’ ve ever used , and every news article you ’ ve ever read .
As web developer Dylan Curran , based in Waterford , Ireland , pointed out : This information has millions of nefarious uses .
You say you ’ re not a terrorist .
Then how come you were googling Isis ?
Work at Google and you ’ re suspicious of your wife ?
Perfect , just look up her location and search history for the last 10 years .
Manage to gain access to someone ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a chronological diary of everything that person has done for the last 10 years .
This is one of the craziest things about the modern age .
We would never let the government or a corporation put cameras/ microphones in our homes or location trackers on us .
But we just went ahead and did it ourselves because – to hell with it !
– I want to watch cute dog videos .
If we continue to be okay with unknown corporate entities watching our every move , collecting every bit of our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it against us in unconstitutional agreements with the government , the words “ freedom ” and “ privacy ” will become but a fleeting memory .
While you may think you have nothing to hide if you ’ ve done nothing wrong , it ’ s only a matter of time before someone deems your completely legal behavior a threat — and uses this massive spy tool to stop that threat .
Now for the solution .
• Stop giving Google all these permissions , go through your device ’ s permissions and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your information .
• Stop letting Google record you by disabling the voice recognition .
• Use browsers like TOR or Brave that don ’ t spy on you .
• Use VPNs and quit paying for internet services that allow third-parties to collect your information .
Unless we reclaim our privacy now , we will be responsible for the insane information dystopia that we create .
Please share this article as Google will likely make sure it does not make the front page of its search engine .

Everyone reading this knows that there are few things on the internet more revealing than their internet search data.
by Matt Agorist
It is for this reason that police must seek out a warrant for an actual suspect in order to obtain said data.
However, a recently unsealed court document found that government can request such data in reverse order by asking Google to disclose everyone who searched a keyword rather than for information on a known suspect.
To spell it out more clearly, authorities can simply pick a search term and construct a warrant around it without anyone being accused of a crime or being a suspect in a crime, and then Google will simply hand over their data. What could possibly go wrong?
The court files in question that exposed this Orwellian nightmare are from the arrest of Michael Williams, an associate of singer and accused sex offender R. Kelly, for allegedly setting fire to a witness’ car in Florida.
Authorities told Google that they needed information on all “users who had searched the address of the residence close in time to the arson.”
As CNET reports, documents showed that Google provided the IP addresses of people who searched for the arson victim’s address, which investigators tied to a phone number belonging to Williams.
Police then used the phone number records to pinpoint the location of Williams’ device near the arson, according to court documents.
While this instance may not seem too intrusive to some, consider the fact of how easily the state was able to obtain search information on completely innocent people.
“This ‘keyword warrant’ evades the Fourth Amendment checks on police surveillance,” said Albert Fox Cahn, the executive director of the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project.
“When a court authorizes a data dump of every person who searched for a specific term or address, it’s likely unconstitutional.”
CNET reports:
The keyword warrants are similar to geofence warrants, in which police make requests to Google for data on all devices logged in at a specific area and time.
Google received 15 times more geofence warrant requests in 2018 compared with 2017, and five times more in 2019 than 2018. The rise in reverse requests from police have troubled Google staffers, according to internal emails.
Naturally, Google, whose been ensnared in controversy after controversy, released a statement claiming that they protect the privacy of its users — unless of course the government tells them to do otherwise.
“We require a warrant and push to narrow the scope of these particular demands when overly broad, including by objecting in court when appropriate,” Google’s director of law enforcement and information security, Richard Salgado, said in a statement.
“These data demands represent less than 1% of total warrants and a small fraction of the overall legal demands for user data that we currently receive.”
The company then declined to disclose how many keyword warrants it received in the last three years. So much for that transparency thing.
In Illinois, warrants like the one mentioned above have already been found by federal court to be a violation of the Fourth Amendment.
Authorities in Illinois simply told Google that they needed all the historical information about what devices were at certain locations and they received all of it — including the data from the countless innocent people who visited these same locations and google handed it over.
Luckily, there are still some members of government who see the ominous nature of police having such easy access to this data.
Todd Spodek, the attorney representing Williams, says he’s seen a bunch of these warrants over the years and worries that they could lead to the arrest of innocent people.
“Think of the ramifications in the future if everyone who searched something in the privacy of their own home was subject to interviews by federal agents,” Spodek said.
“Someone could be interested in how people die a certain way or how drug deals are done, and it could be misconstrued or used improperly.”
Indeed, the complete lack of probable cause in these warrants is shocking.
A tyrannical state who wanted to identify those who oppose it — peacefully — could turn over one of these keyword warrants to Google and entire activist populations could be categorical rooted out and subject to invasive searches, arrests, or worse.
While it is the state asking for this information, it is Google who is storing in such a way that creates a unique profile on billions of users.
“If Google stored data in a way that was truly de-identified, then they also couldn’t give it to the government,” the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s surveillance litigation director Jennifer Lynch said.
“Google’s not setting up their system or changing their practices in a way that could prevent these kinds of searches.”
In fact, they are actually building their system to facilitate this very thing.
As TFTP has reported, the information Facebook and other social media companies keep on its users is utterly mind-blowing, consisting of everything from text messages to liked posts, the social media giant is building profiles on billions.
However, this is nothing compared to what Google has.
Google knows where you’ve been
Google stores your location (if you have location tracking turned on) every time you turn on your phone.
You can see a timeline of where you’ve been from the very first day you started using Google on your phone.
Click on THIS LINK to see your own data.
Google knows everything you’ve ever searched – and deleted
Google stores search history across all your devices.
That can mean that, even if you delete your search history and phone history on one device, it may still have data saved from other devices.
Click on this link to see your own data: myactivity.google.com/myactivity
Google has an advertisement profile of you
Google creates an advertisement profile based on your information, including your location, gender, age, hobbies, career, interests, relationship status, possible weight (need to lose 10lb in one day?) and income.
Click on this link to see your own data: google.com/settings/ads/
Google knows all the apps you use
Google stores information on every app and extension you use. They know how often you use them, where you use them, and who you use them to interact with.
That means they know who you talk to on Facebook, what countries are you speaking with, what time you go to sleep.
Click on this link to see your own data: security.google.com/settings/security/permissions
Google has all of your YouTube history
Google stores all of your YouTube history, so they probably know whether you’re going to be a parent soon, if you’re a conservative, if you’re a progressive, if you’re Jewish, Christian, or Muslim, if you’re feeling depressed or suicidal, if you’re anorexic …
Click on this link to see your own data: youtube.com/feed/history/search_history
The data Google has on you can fill millions of Word documents
Google offers an option to download all of the data it stores about you. I’ve requested to download it and the file is 5.5GB big, which is roughly 3m Word documents.
Manage to gain access to someone’s Google account? Perfect, you have a diary of everything that person has done.
This link includes your bookmarks, emails, contacts, your Google Drive files, all of the above information, your YouTube videos, the photos you’ve taken on your phone, the businesses you’ve bought from, the products you’ve bought through Google …
They also have data from your calendar, your Google hangout sessions, your location history, the music you listen to, the Google books you’ve purchased, the Google groups you’re in, the websites you’ve created, the phones you’ve owned, the pages you’ve shared, how many steps you walk in a day …
Click on this link to see your own data: google.com/takeout
Google knows every image you’ve ever downloaded and where you accessed them. They also know what events you’ve attended and when—even when you don’t enter them in your own calendar.
What’s more, even if you’ve deleted all this information, Google still has it!
But that’s not all. They also have every email you’ve ever sent and received, including deleted ones and spam.
The have a record of every single website you’ve ever visited, every search you’ve ever done, every app you’ve ever used, and every news article you’ve ever read.
As web developer Dylan Curran, based in Waterford, Ireland, pointed out:
This information has millions of nefarious uses.
You say you’re not a terrorist. Then how come you were googling Isis?
Work at Google and you’re suspicious of your wife? Perfect, just look up her location and search history for the last 10 years.
Manage to gain access to someone’s Google account? Perfect, you have a chronological diary of everything that person has done for the last 10 years.
This is one of the craziest things about the modern age. We would never let the government or a corporation put cameras/ microphones in our homes or location trackers on us. But we just went ahead and did it ourselves because – to hell with it! – I want to watch cute dog videos.
If we continue to be okay with unknown corporate entities watching our every move, collecting every bit of our personal information, and using all of it against us in unconstitutional agreements with the government, the words “freedom” and “privacy” will become but a fleeting memory.
While you may think you have nothing to hide if you’ve done nothing wrong, it’s only a matter of time before someone deems your completely legal behavior a threat — and uses this massive spy tool to stop that threat.
Now for the solution.
Stop giving Google all these permissions, go through your device’s permissions and disable everything that may let Google collect your information. Stop letting Google record you by disabling the voice recognition. Use browsers like TOR or Brave that don’t spy on you. Use search engines like DuckDuckgo.com. Use VPNs and quit paying for internet services that allow third-parties to collect your information.
Unless we reclaim our privacy now, we will be responsible for the insane information dystopia that we create.
Please share this article as Google will likely make sure it does not make the front page of its search engine.


humansarefree--2020-10-20--6 Ways to Disrupt Agenda 2030 & the Great Reset

In this video John Bush shares six ways you can disrupt Agenda 21/2030 , The Great Reset , and the @ @ @ @ @ are the various vehicles the powers that wish they were are utilizing in order to @ @ @ @ @ government in which all humans are tracked and controlled .
Six areas of disruption and @ @ @ @ @ Stay in good health 2 .
Raise free and sovereign children 3 .
Become an @ @ @ @ @ Minimize your digital footprint 5 .
Get out of the city 6 .
Build community @ @ @ @ @ Cell Network ]

In this video John Bush shares six ways you can disrupt Agenda 21/2030, The Great Reset, and the Growth of Technocracy.
These are the various vehicles the powers that wish they were are utilizing in order to create a dictatorial technocratic global government in which all humans are tracked and controlled.
Six areas of disruption and opt out:
1. Stay in good health
2. Raise free and sovereign children
3. Become an entrepreneur / counter-economist
4. Minimize your digital footprint
5. Get out of the city
6. Build community [and join the Freedom Cell Network]
Source: YouTube.com


humansarefree--2020-10-20--Whistleblower: Google Search Engine is ‘Skewing Results’ to Benefit Democrats

A person who claims to be a program manager at Google Cloud has told investigative journalists with Project Veritas that the search engine is intentionally manipulating results in order to benefit the Democrats and to hinder President Trump ’ s campaign .
Ritesh Lakhkar , who identified himself as a technical program manager at Google ’ s Cloud service , made the comments in footage released Monday .
The interview appears to have been filmed without Lakhkar ’ s knowledge .
The project manager accused Google of “ playing god ” with US politics , and of ‘ skewing ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ news and talking points where Trump is concerned .
When asked if Google favours one party over another , Lakhkar commented that “ The wind is blowing toward Democrats , because GOP equals Trump and Trump equals GOP .
Everybody hates it , even though GOP may have good traits , no one wants to acknowledge them right now.
” “ So the wind is blowing toward Democrats , so let ’ s skew the results toward Democrats , ” he added .
“ It ’ s skewed by the owners or the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ explains , adding “ Like , if I say ‘ Hey Google , here ’ s another two billion dollars , feed this data set of whenever Joe Biden is searched , you ’ ll get these results.
’ ” Lakhkar slammed Big Tech for “ playing god and taking away freedom of speech on both sides.
” He emphasised that “ Like , if it was fraud it doesn ’ t matter , but for Trump or Melania Trump , it matters… Trump says something , misinformation .
You ’ re going @ @ @ @ @ @ @ illegal under whatever pretext .
And if a Democratic leader says that , you ’ re going to leave it.
” Describing the working environment at Google , Lakhkar said “ your opinion matters more than your work.
” “ When Trump won the first time , people were crying in the corridors of Google .
There were protests , there were marches .
There were like , I guess , group therapy sessions for employees organized by HR , ” he said .
The whistleblower continued , “ I guess that ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suffocated [ at Google ] .
Because on one side you have this unprofessional attitude , and on the other side you have this ultra-leftist attitude .
Your entire existence is questioned.
” Google has not responded to the allegations at time of writing .

A person who claims to be a program manager at Google Cloud has told investigative journalists with Project Veritas that the search engine is intentionally manipulating results in order to benefit the Democrats and to hinder President Trump’s campaign.
Ritesh Lakhkar, who identified himself as a technical program manager at Google’s Cloud service, made the comments in footage released Monday. The interview appears to have been filmed without Lakhkar’s knowledge.
The project manager accused Google of “playing god” with US politics, and of ‘skewing’ it’s algorithms to project negative news and talking points where Trump is concerned.
When asked if Google favours one party over another, Lakhkar commented that “The wind is blowing toward Democrats, because GOP equals Trump and Trump equals GOP. Everybody hates it, even though GOP may have good traits, no one wants to acknowledge them right now.”
“So the wind is blowing toward Democrats, so let’s skew the results toward Democrats,” he added.
“It’s skewed by the owners or the drivers of the algorithm,” Lakhkar explains, adding “Like, if I say ‘Hey Google, here’s another two billion dollars, feed this data set of whenever Joe Biden is searched, you’ll get these results.’”
Lakhkar slammed Big Tech for “playing god and taking away freedom of speech on both sides.”
BREAKING: @Google Program Manager Confirms Election Interference In Favor of @JoeBiden Google search “skewed by owners and drivers of the algorithm” “Plain and simple trying to play god”#ExposeGoogle pic.twitter.com/swyV1W3ZKt — Project Veritas (@Project_Veritas) October 19, 2020
He emphasised that “Like, if it was fraud it doesn’t matter, but for Trump or Melania Trump, it matters… Trump says something, misinformation. You’re going to delete that because it’s illegal under whatever pretext. And if a Democratic leader says that, you’re going to leave it.”
Describing the working environment at Google, Lakhkar said “your opinion matters more than your work.”
“When Trump won the first time, people were crying in the corridors of Google. There were protests, there were marches. There were like, I guess, group therapy sessions for employees organized by HR,” he said.
The whistleblower continued, “I guess that’s one of the reasons I feel suffocated [at Google]. Because on one side you have this unprofessional attitude, and on the other side you have this ultra-leftist attitude. Your entire existence is questioned.”
Remember when Google had that meeting in 2016 after Trump won and vowed to never let it happen again? Have you tried finding anything on Google in the last 2 years that doesn't amplify Democrat talking points? "Oh, but there's no bias…we're non partisan." Yeah, OK. 😄 — Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) October 20, 2020
Google has not responded to the allegations at time of writing.
Source: Summit.news


humansarefree--2020-10-21--First Tests of New ‘Immunity Passports’ Will Take Place Wednesday

With CommonPass , travelers would take a COVID-19 test at a certified lab , then the results would be uploaded @ @ @ @ @ they would complete any other health-related questionnaires required by the country to which they ’ @ @ @ @ @ , airlines can use CP to check whether travelers have met the entry requirements .
@ @ @ @ @ simply scanning a QR code generated by the app .
Even after the COVID-19 pandemic @ @ @ @ @ passports ’ could be used to offer evidence that a traveler has been vaccinated – @ @ @ @ @ but for any other diseases .
The first iteration of these new “ health passports @ @ @ @ @ the test on Wednesday when a small group of passengers flying from the UK to @ @ @ @ @ from London ’ s Heathrow Airport to Newark on a United Airlines flight on Wednesday @ @ @ @ @ first wave of test subjects .

With CommonPass, travelers would take a COVID-19 test at a certified lab, then the results would be uploaded to their phone. Then they would complete any other health-related questionnaires required by the country to which they’re traveling.
by Tyler Durden (excerpts)
Before boarding, airlines can use CP to check whether travelers have met the entry requirements. This can be done by simply scanning a QR code generated by the app.
Even after the COVID-19 pandemic ends, these ‘health passports’ could be used to offer evidence that a traveler has been vaccinated – not just for COVID-19, but for any other diseases.
The first iteration of these new “health passports” will be put to the test on Wednesday when a small group of passengers flying from the UK to the US.
Passengers flying from London’s Heathrow Airport to Newark on a United Airlines flight on Wednesday will be part of the first wave of test subjects.


humansarefree--2020-10-21--UK to Pass Bill Allowing Police, Gov’t Agents to Break Law When ‘Necessary’

Human rights groups have criticized a U.K. bill likely to become law which will allow criminal actions by government agencies .
The U.K .
Houses of Parliament look set to soon pass a controversial new bill which would allow public authorities to approve and commit crimes without any clarification or restraints .
The Covert Human Intelligence Sources ( CHIS ) Bill was introduced to Parliament by the Home Secretary Priti Patel , with the much-publicized intention of permitting undercover operatives to break the law .
However , the bill is far more extensive in terms of who it extends such @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of governmental departments listed : “ Any police force ; The National Crime Agency ; The Serious Fraud Office ; Any of the intelligence services ; Any of Her Majesty ’ s forces ; Revenue and Customs ; Her Majesty ’ s Revenue and Customs ; The Department of Health and Social Care ; The Home Office ; The Ministry of Justice ; The Competition and Markets Authority ; The Environment Agency ; The Financial Conduct Authority ; The Food Standards Agency ; The Gambling Commission.
” The bill proposes that criminal activity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all these bodies .
The summary of the document states that it is to : “ make provision for , and in connection with , the authorisation of criminal conduct in the course of , or otherwise in connection with , the conduct of covert human intelligence sources.
” The CHIS bill is deliberately vague about what crimes are to be permitted , stating that criminal conduct is necessary if it is “ in the interests of national security ; for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime or of preventing disorder ; @ @ @ @ @ @ @ well-being of the United Kingdom.
” Any government agent may grant permission for criminal activity , providing that he merely “ believes ” it to be necessary in accordance with the prescriptions mentioned .
No substantial proof seems to be required .
Whilst it purports to be in agreement with the Human Rights Act 1998 ( HRA ) which forbids murder and torture , the bill also provides the caveat that criminal action is allowed as long as it is proportionate to the end required : “ that the authorised conduct is proportionate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by that conduct.
” A briefing about the proposed bill , prepared by five human rights organizations , mentions some major concerns regarding the legislation .
It warns that the new bill contains “ no express prohibition on authorising crimes that would constitute human rights violations , including murder , torture ( e.g .
punishment shootings ) , kidnap , or sexual offences , or on conduct that would interfere with the course of justice.
” This is in contrast to equivalent legislation in the U.S and Canada , which does forbid murder @ @ @ @ @ @ @ briefing also points out that despite the CHIS bill apparently stating its alignment with the Human Rights Act , there is a loophole which could see the U.K. Government ignoring the act : “ The Bill relies on the Human Rights Act as a safeguard , despite the Government making clear that it does not believe that the Human Rights Act applies to abuses committed by its agents , even torture.
” Continuing , the briefing states : “ the HRA can not be seen as a safeguard against the authorisation of agent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ taken the ( fundamentally wrong ) position that the HRA does not apply to crimes committed by its covert agents.
” The document further warns that the safeguards which will be established in authorizing criminal activity are less stringent than those necessary for permitting phone tapping : “ The arrangements for authorisation oversight and post-operational accountability are weaker than those for phone tapping or searches by law enforcement , despite involving potentially far more harmful conduct.
” David Kurten , a prominent pro-life candidate for London Mayor election 2021 , termed the CHIS @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of power ” by the government .
Amnesty International also condemned the bill at its introduction , and after it passed the third reading : “ It ’ s hugely worrying that we ’ re a step closer to seeing this deeply dangerous bill become law .
MPs are signing off on a licence for government agencies to authorise torture and murder.
” The bill has come about as a result of a 2019 decision , dubbed the Third Direction case , which ruled that undercover agents and informants could legally break the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was made with a majority of 3-2 , prompting the government to rush the CHIS bill through parliament before any legal challenge could successfully be made .
After having passed the final stage in the House of Commons , by a vote of 313-98 , the new CHIS bill will now proceed to the House of Lords for further debate .

Human rights groups have criticized a U.K. bill likely to become law which will allow criminal actions by government agencies.
by Michael Haynes
The U.K. Houses of Parliament look set to soon pass a controversial new bill which would allow public authorities to approve and commit crimes without any clarification or restraints.
The Covert Human Intelligence Sources (CHIS) Bill was introduced to Parliament by the Home Secretary Priti Patel, with the much-publicized intention of permitting undercover operatives to break the law.
However, the bill is far more extensive in terms of who it extends such provision to, with a wide variety of governmental departments listed:
“Any police force; The National Crime Agency; The Serious Fraud Office; Any of the intelligence services; Any of Her Majesty’s forces; Revenue and Customs; Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs; The Department of Health and Social Care; The Home Office; The Ministry of Justice; The Competition and Markets Authority; The Environment Agency; The Financial Conduct Authority; The Food Standards Agency; The Gambling Commission.”
The bill proposes that criminal activity would thus be permitted for members of all these bodies.
The summary of the document states that it is to: “make provision for, and in connection with, the authorisation of criminal conduct in the course of, or otherwise in connection with, the conduct of covert human intelligence sources.”
The CHIS bill is deliberately vague about what crimes are to be permitted, stating that criminal conduct is necessary if it is “in the interests of national security; for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime or of preventing disorder; or in the interests of the economic well-being of the United Kingdom.”
Any government agent may grant permission for criminal activity, providing that he merely “believes” it to be necessary in accordance with the prescriptions mentioned. No substantial proof seems to be required.
Whilst it purports to be in agreement with the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) which forbids murder and torture, the bill also provides the caveat that criminal action is allowed as long as it is proportionate to the end required:
“that the authorised conduct is proportionate to what is sought to be achieved by that conduct.”
A briefing about the proposed bill, prepared by five human rights organizations, mentions some major concerns regarding the legislation.
It warns that the new bill contains “no express prohibition on authorising crimes that would constitute human rights violations, including murder, torture (e.g. punishment shootings), kidnap, or sexual offences, or on conduct that would interfere with the course of justice.”
This is in contrast to equivalent legislation in the U.S and Canada, which does forbid murder, rape, and torture.
The briefing also points out that despite the CHIS bill apparently stating its alignment with the Human Rights Act, there is a loophole which could see the U.K. Government ignoring the act:
“The Bill relies on the Human Rights Act as a safeguard, despite the Government making clear that it does not believe that the Human Rights Act applies to abuses committed by its agents, even torture.”
Continuing, the briefing states: “the HRA cannot be seen as a safeguard against the authorisation of agent criminality because the Government has in fact taken the (fundamentally wrong) position that the HRA does not apply to crimes committed by its covert agents.”
The document further warns that the safeguards which will be established in authorizing criminal activity are less stringent than those necessary for permitting phone tapping:
“The arrangements for authorisation oversight and post-operational accountability are weaker than those for phone tapping or searches by law enforcement, despite involving potentially far more harmful conduct.”
David Kurten, a prominent pro-life candidate for London Mayor election 2021, termed the CHIS bill as the “latest utter abuse of power” by the government.
Amnesty International also condemned the bill at its introduction, and after it passed the third reading:
“It’s hugely worrying that we’re a step closer to seeing this deeply dangerous bill become law. MPs are signing off on a licence for government agencies to authorise torture and murder.”
The bill has come about as a result of a 2019 decision, dubbed the Third Direction case, which ruled that undercover agents and informants could legally break the law in certain occasions.
The decision was made with a majority of 3-2, prompting the government to rush the CHIS bill through parliament before any legal challenge could successfully be made.
After having passed the final stage in the House of Commons, by a vote of 313-98, the new CHIS bill will now proceed to the House of Lords for further debate.


humansarefree--2020-10-22--Trump Turns Hard On Fauci: ‘All These Idiots… Got It Wrong!’

Speaking on a conference call yesterday , President Trump made what appears to be a final and irreversible break with @ @ @ @ @ “ facemask ” policies of Anthony Fauci and the rest of the Covid “ experts @ @ @ @ @ past half year or so attacking civil liberties in the name of fighting a virus @ @ @ @ @ of COVID… People are tired of hearing Fauci and these idiots , all these idiots @ @ @ @ @ time he goes on television there ’ s always a bomb , but there ’ @ @ @ @ @ you fire him .
This guy ’ s a disaster.
” – President Donald J.
@ @ @ @ @ on Fauci and all the other “ idiots who got it wrong ” pay dividends @ @ @ @ @ the finish ?

Speaking on a conference call yesterday, President Trump made what appears to be a final and irreversible break with the “lockdown” and “facemask” policies of Anthony Fauci and the rest of the Covid “experts” who have spent the past half year or so attacking civil liberties in the name of fighting a virus.
“People are tired of COVID… People are tired of hearing Fauci and these idiots, all these idiots who got it wrong… every time he goes on television there’s always a bomb, but there’s a bigger bomb if you fire him. This guy’s a disaster.” – President Donald J. Trump
Will this last-minute attack on Fauci and all the other “idiots who got it wrong” pay dividends as the campaign winds toward the finish?
Important: Image Surfaces Of Dr. Fauci With George Soros, Billy Boy Sr., David Rockefeller, Ted Turner
Sources: Ron Paul Liberty Report; We Are Change;


humansarefree--2020-10-21--List of the Largest Monoliths Ever Created by Ancient Civilizations

A monolith is be a large piece of rock that is intended or was used to build a structure or a monument , alone or together with other stones .
Ancient mankind has had the ability to quarry transport and place into position massive blocks of stone ( monoliths ) that weigh more than 100 tons .
A monolith can be a monument in itself ( statue , monolithic stone ) .
Monolithic sacred stones are found from prehistoric times ( menhirs ) and in many civilizations , such as the Mayan civilization ( steles representing the sovereigns or even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) and the Aztec civilization ( the Coatlicue monolith , representing the goddess of death , or the decorated monolith of Tizoc that represents fifteen victories of this sovereign ) .
The stone spheres of Costa Rica are more than 500 monoliths that weight up to 16 tons .
These spheres are associated with constellations and astronomical events .
Researchers place them around 6,000 BC , and others say that they could date back as far as 12,000 BC .
The first buildings composed of monoliths are dolmens , which date back from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the biggest stone ever moved by man is the granite pedestal of the Bronze Horseman , which was transported to St. Petersburg in 1770 .
It is considered as the largest stone ever moved by man , having an estimated weight of about 1500 tons .
The largest monolith ever carved by man ( if we are to ignore the megaliths of Gornaya Shoria in Russia ) is the unfinished obelisk of Aswan , which has a weight of around 1200 tons .
This massive obelisk never left the quarry , as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the bedrock .
The largest stone ever carved and moved by man is the massive stone of Baalbek , called Hadjar-el-Qoublé ( the stone of the South ) , with dimensions of 21.50 × 4.80 × 4.20 m , the massive rock is believed to weigh between 900 and 1100 tons , according to fairly constant estimates .
It left the quarry but remained planted at an angle , not far from the site of its extraction .
Worthy of mention are also the colossi of Memnon .
The two giant stone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and located on the west bank of the Nile , opposite the Egyptian city of Luxor , near Medinet Habu and south of the great Tebanas necropolis .
The Colossi of Memnon have a weight of 1300 tons each .
( The statues itself have 750 tons while the pedestal each weighing 550 tons ) .
The monoliths of Gornaya Shoria are also considered some of the largest ever carved .
However , there is a great debate among experts whether these monoliths are naturally occurring , or were carved by an unknown @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reported that the largest sections or blocks of stone have estimated weights between three and four thousand tons , which would make them larger than the megaliths at Baalbek , in Lebanon .
The Stone statues on Easter Island — the Moai — are also massive monoliths created by ancient man .
So far , experts have identified more than 900 Moai Statues sculpted by the ancient Rapa Nui scattered throughout the island .
Most of them were carved in tufa from the Rano Raraku volcanic cone , where more than 400 Moai @ @ @ @ @ @ @ According to historical data , the entire development of the various construction techniques was developed on the island between 700 AD and 1600 AD .
Everything indicates that the quarry was suddenly abandoned and half-carved statues were left in the rock .
The largest Moai statue is the Te Tokanga — the giant .
This Moai is located at the main quarry of Rano Raraku and remains unfinished .
With a weight of more than 270 tons , it remains a mystery as to how the ancient builders planned on moving it .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ modern technology .
Island tradition holds that this Moai was destined for the Ahu Vinapu ceremonial center .
The ‘ Menhir de Champ-Dolent ’ is the tallest of Brittany ’ s standing stones .
Its height above ground is between 9.3 and 9.5 meters , and is made of pinkish granite .
This massive standing stone has an estimated weight of around 100 tons .

A monolith is be a large piece of rock that is intended or was used to build a structure or a monument, alone or together with other stones.
Ancient mankind has had the ability to quarry transport and place into position massive blocks of stone (monoliths) that weigh more than 100 tons.
A monolith can be a monument in itself (statue, monolithic stone).
Monolithic sacred stones are found from prehistoric times (menhirs) and in many civilizations, such as the Mayan civilization (steles representing the sovereigns or even the original “zoomorphs” of Quiriguá) and the Aztec civilization (the Coatlicue monolith, representing the goddess of death, or the decorated monolith of Tizoc that represents fifteen victories of this sovereign).
The stone spheres of Costa Rica are more than 500 monoliths that weight up to 16 tons. These spheres are associated with constellations and astronomical events.
Researchers place them around 6,000 BC, and others say that they could date back as far as 12,000 BC.
The first buildings composed of monoliths are dolmens, which date back from the 5th millennium BC.
The largest anthropogenic monoliths
Officially speaking, the biggest stone ever moved by man is the granite pedestal of the Bronze Horseman, which was transported to St. Petersburg in 1770. It is considered as the largest stone ever moved by man, having an estimated weight of about 1500 tons.
The largest monolith ever carved by man (if we are to ignore the megaliths of Gornaya Shoria in Russia) is the unfinished obelisk of Aswan, which has a weight of around 1200 tons.
This massive obelisk never left the quarry, as the massive rock cracked before being separated from the bedrock.
The largest stone ever carved and moved by man is the massive stone of Baalbek, called Hadjar-el-Qoublé (the stone of the South), with dimensions of 21.50 × 4.80 × 4.20 m, the massive rock is believed to weigh between 900 and 1100 tons, according to fairly constant estimates.
It left the quarry but remained planted at an angle, not far from the site of its extraction.
Worthy of mention are also the colossi of Memnon. The two giant stone statues represent the pharaoh Amenhotep III, and located on the west bank of the Nile, opposite the Egyptian city of Luxor, near Medinet Habu and south of the great Tebanas necropolis.
The Colossi of Memnon have a weight of 1300 tons each. (The statues itself have 750 tons while the pedestal each weighing 550 tons).
The monoliths of Gornaya Shoria are also considered some of the largest ever carved. However, there is a great debate among experts whether these monoliths are naturally occurring, or were carved by an unknown ancient civilization from Siberia.
It is reported that the largest sections or blocks of stone have estimated weights between three and four thousand tons, which would make them larger than the megaliths at Baalbek, in Lebanon.
The Stone statues on Easter Island — the Moai — are also massive monoliths created by ancient man.
So far, experts have identified more than 900 Moai Statues sculpted by the ancient Rapa Nui scattered throughout the island.
Most of them were carved in tufa from the Rano Raraku volcanic cone, where more than 400 Moai remain in mixed phases of construction.
According to historical data, the entire development of the various construction techniques was developed on the island between 700 AD and 1600 AD.
Everything indicates that the quarry was suddenly abandoned and half-carved statues were left in the rock.
The largest Moai statue is the Te Tokanga — the giant. This Moai is located at the main quarry of Rano Raraku and remains unfinished.
With a weight of more than 270 tons, it remains a mystery as to how the ancient builders planned on moving it.
Such a feat is even unthinkable for modern technology. Island tradition holds that this Moai was destined for the Ahu Vinapu ceremonial center.
The ‘Menhir de Champ-Dolent’ is the tallest of Brittany’s standing stones. Its height above ground is between 9.3 and 9.5 meters, and is made of pinkish granite. This massive standing stone has an estimated weight of around 100 tons.
Reference: Ancient-code.com


humansarefree--2020-10-21--Chinese Ambassador Claims Western Leaders Are Pursuing a ‘Genocide Policy’ Against Their Own Populat

Chinese Ambassador Claims Western Leaders Are Pursuing a ‘Genocide Policy’ Against Their Own Population

In response to accusations that the Communist state is “ committing genocide ” against its Uyghur population , China ’ s Ambassador to Grenada has accused western leaders of pursuing a “ genocide policy ” by citing declining birth rates .
The claim was made in response to U.S. national security advisor Robert O ’ Brien ’ s assertion at an Aspen Institute event that , “ If not a genocide , something close to it going on in Xinjiang.
” O ’ Brien cited seizures by U.S. customs of “ massive numbers ” of hair products made with human @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Chinese are literally shaving the heads of Uighur women and making hair products and sending them to the United States , ” he said .
Ambassador Dr Zhao Yongchen shot back on Twitter by claiming that western leaders were overseeing an indirect policy of genocide against their own population .
“ In Europe and America , the birth rate of whites has fallen very seriously .
Is this the result of the genocide policy pursued by their leaders ?
” asked Yongchen .
“ The Uyghur population in Xinjiang has exploded , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ committing genocide by conspirators .
Nosense !
” he added .
Read also : Ex-Russian Intel Officer Says COVID-19 Is Part Of The Depopulation Agenda While the declining birth rate of whites in western countries is an accepted fact , the media has framed beliefs that this is a deliberate policy as a dangerous conspiracy theory .
Data released by the U.S. Census Bureau earlier this year found that whites under the age of 16 are now a minority in America for the first time since records began .
“ We are browning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” William Frey , a senior fellow at The Brookings Institution , told the Associated Press .
“ This is going to be a diversified century for the United States , and it ’ s beginning with this youngest generation.
” As Chris Menahan notes , presidential candidate Joe Biden has previously welcomed the demographic decline of whites .
“ It ’ s not going to stop , ” Biden told a White House summit in 2015 .
“ Nor should we want it to stop .
As a matter of fact @ @ @ @ @ @ @ things I think we can be most proud of .
”

In response to accusations that the Communist state is “committing genocide” against its Uyghur population, China’s Ambassador to Grenada has accused western leaders of pursuing a “genocide policy” by citing declining birth rates.
The claim was made in response to U.S. national security advisor Robert O’Brien’s assertion at an Aspen Institute event that, “If not a genocide, something close to it going on in Xinjiang.”
O’Brien cited seizures by U.S. customs of “massive numbers” of hair products made with human hair from the region.
“The Chinese are literally shaving the heads of Uighur women and making hair products and sending them to the United States,” he said.
Ambassador Dr Zhao Yongchen shot back on Twitter by claiming that western leaders were overseeing an indirect policy of genocide against their own population.
“In Europe and America, the birth rate of whites has fallen very seriously. Is this the result of the genocide policy pursued by their leaders?” asked Yongchen.
“The Uyghur population in Xinjiang has exploded, but the Chinese govt has been accused of committing genocide by conspirators. Nosense!” he added.
Read also: Ex-Russian Intel Officer Says COVID-19 Is Part Of The Depopulation Agenda
While the declining birth rate of whites in western countries is an accepted fact, the media has framed beliefs that this is a deliberate policy as a dangerous conspiracy theory.
Data released by the U.S. Census Bureau earlier this year found that whites under the age of 16 are now a minority in America for the first time since records began.
“We are browning from bottom up in our age structure,” William Frey, a senior fellow at The Brookings Institution, told the Associated Press.
“This is going to be a diversified century for the United States, and it’s beginning with this youngest generation.”
As Chris Menahan notes, presidential candidate Joe Biden has previously welcomed the demographic decline of whites.
“It’s not going to stop,” Biden told a White House summit in 2015.
“Nor should we want it to stop. As a matter of fact, it’s one of the things I think we can be most proud of.”
Source: Summit.news