humansarefree--2020-05-23--Mark Zuckerberg’s Hypocrisy on Free Speech

[ Back in October 2019 ] , Zuckerberg gave a talk regarding free speech .
He has referred to Facebook as a technology company .
He explicitly stated that “ We are a tech company , not a media company.
” But then subsequently , in Congressional testimony , he gave a more nuanced answer : “ I view us as a tech company because the primary that we do is build technology and products .
I agree that we ’ re responsible for the content , but we don ’ t produce the content .
“ I think when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a media company or a publisher , my understanding of what they ’ re really getting at is do we feel responsibility for content on our platform .
“ The answer to that , I think , is clearly yes .
But I don ’ t think that ’ s incompatible with fundamentally at our core being a technology company.
” Later , in filing a motion to dismiss the lawsuit from Laura Loomer , Facebook ’ s attorneys stated that “ Under well-established law , neither Facebook nor any other publisher can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ else ’ s message ” and that referring to Loomer and others as “ dangerous individuals ” and “ promoting hate ” as constitutionally protected opinions of a publisher .
Zuckerberg in his recent speech at Georgetown stated : “ People having the power to express themselves at scale is a new kind of force in the world — a Fifth Estate alongside the other power structures of society .
“ People no longer have to rely on traditional gatekeepers in politics or media to make their voices heard , and that has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ concerns about how tech platforms have centralized power , but I actually believe the much bigger story is how much these platforms have decentralized power by putting it directly into people ’ s hands .
It ’ s part of this amazing expansion of voice through law , culture and technology.
” “ We don ’ t fact-check political ads .
We don ’ t do this to help politicians , but because we think people should be able to see for themselves what politicians are saying .
“ And if content is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ take it down even if it would otherwise conflict with many of our standards.
” “ I know many people disagree , but , in general , I don ’ t think it ’ s right for a private company to censor politicians or the news in a democracy.
” “ Increasingly , we ’ re seeing people try to define more speech as dangerous because it may lead to political outcomes they see as unacceptable .
“ Some hold the view that since the stakes are so high , they can no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ power to communicate and decide what to believe for themselves .
“ I personally believe this is more dangerous for democracy over the long term than almost any speech .
Democracy depends on the idea that we hold each others ’ right to express ourselves and be heard above our own desire to always get the outcomes we want.
” I take the liberty to quote Zuckerberg at length as I believe them to be of merit .
But that raises the question : is Facebook a technology company that promotes free speech @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from liability ?
Or is it a publisher with the right of censorship , the right to edit content as it deems at its discretion , whatever the methodology ; but must then assume responsibility and liability ?
To say you assume responsibility by declaring yourself exempt from liability is an absurd contradiction .
It is the assumption of liability that binds the statement of responsibility .
As troubled as I am regarding the hypocrisy and contradictions of Zuckerberg ’ s words and Facebook policy and practices , it is more troubling that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ criticized his speech as they take a much narrower view of what speech should be protected and what speech should be permitted .
They have very nice words to use to justify their point of view : fake news , Russian bots , hate speech , intentional misinformation , political extremism , political ads that lie , divisive content , etc .
Essentially many believe technology should be used as a censor according to the criteria of who controls the technology company in partnership with a mob that wants to repress dissent .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Control our thoughts .
Control our actions .
According to their perspective of what is right , just and moral .
That they anoint themselves as the modern version of Torquemada .
And make no mistake , it is an Inquisition .
A strategy to dehumanize , delegitimize , and digitally exterminate those who disagree .
During the 1800 election where Jefferson challenged Adams , to a great extent because of the Alien and Sedition Acts , a newspaper supporting the Federalist Party ( Adams ) wrote that if Jefferson was elected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , adultery , and incest will be openly taught and practiced , the air will be rent with the cries of the distressed , the soil will be soaked with blood , and the nation black with crimes.
” Actually , most newspapers then were affiliated and backed by political parties and served as propaganda machines .
And the public was considered mature enough to process and filter the noise on their own .
If there is doubt as to the intent of our founders , permit me to cite : “ If @ @ @ @ @ @ @ anything till they were sure it would offend nobody , there would be very little printed.
” — Benjamin Franklin “ If men are to be precluded from offering their sentiments on a matter , which may involve the most serious and alarming consequences that can invite the consideration of mankind , reason is of no use to us ; the freedom of speech may be taken away , and dumb and silent we may be led , like sheep , to the slaughter.
” — George Washington “ In those wretched countries @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tongue his own , he can scarce call anything his own .
Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech ; a thing terrible to publick traitors.
” – Benjamin Franklin “ The press , confined to truth , needs no other legal restraint ; the public judgment will correct false reasonings and opinions , on a full hearing of all parties ; and no other definite line can be drawn between the inestimable liberty of the press and its demoralizing licentiousness.
” – Thomas @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the human mind … and the freedom of the press , every spirit should be ready to devote itself to martyrdom ; for as long as we may think as we will , and speak as we think the condition of man will proceed in improvement.
” – Thomas Jefferson And it is not only the founders who have expressed the sanctity of free speech without censorship , independent of its content .
“ The freedom of speech and the freedom of the press have not been granted to the people in order @ @ @ @ @ @ @ please , and which are based upon accepted thought , but the right to say the things which displease , the right to say the things which may convey the new and yet unexpected thoughts , the right to say things , even though they do a wrong.
” — Samuel Gompers “ We are reluctant to admit that we owe our liberties to men of a type that today we hate and fear — unruly men , disturbers of the peace … in a word , free men .
… Freedom is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and even those who are willing to pay it have to admit that the price is great.
” — Gerald W. Johnson “ You tell me that law is above freedom of utterance .
And I reply that you can have no wise laws nor free entertainment of wise laws unless there is free expression of the wisdom of the people — and , alas , their folly with it .
But if there is freedom , folly will die of its own poison , and the wisdom will survive.
” — William @ @ @ @ @ @ @ arbitrary use of power or control .
The oppressive power over the mind of man .
If so-called social media places limits on speech , censorship , then the right honest and accurate label should either be platforms that practice tyranny or publishers liable for the content that it ’ s editors decide to remain posted .
Technology , decentralized , without any controlling authority like bitcoin , liberates us .
No censorship .
Freely transferable .
Independent of any third party .
Absence of force .
Unfortunately almost all technology developed today @ @ @ @ @ @ @ censor .
Which is fine if they acknowledge themselves as publishers and should be responsible , as all publishers are , by being liable for the content it chooses to publish .
Whether it is their words or the words others have agreed to submit and they have agreed to remain posted for all to see .
This is the danger of centralization of power and authority .
Eliminates checks and balances .
The end of due process .
A challenge to the preservation of all our civil liberties enshrined in our Bill @ @ @ @ @ @ @ contestability , there is little to no competition .
A condition for a free society is political competition and economic competition .
Free of persecution .
The reliance on markets and contract law entered into voluntarily .
And the existence and recognition of inalienable rights .
If not , we breach our social contract .
We punish dissent .
We choose might makes right .
We choose to impose on others , through tyranny of the majority or even tyranny without a majority The choice is as stark as deciding what we stand @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disapprove of what you say and will defend to the death your right to say it OR I wholly disapprove of what you say and will digitally exterminate you if you dare try to say it .
An only true public forum is censorship resistant .
And censorship resistant can only prosper and nourish in an environment where ther is no authority entity , no controlling party .
Permissionless .
Where permission is required and the party that grants consent is not contestable , tyranny exists .
Rabbi Hillel said “ that which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do to your fellow.
” If you want the right to speak , express your ideas , express your opinions .
Assert your point of view .
Assert your beliefs .
And if it would be despicable to you if someone prevented you from doing so , persecuting you , dehumanizing you , deplatforming you , digitally exterminating you .
Then it is despicable for you to do it to your fellow .
Torquemada or Jefferson .
Torquemada or Franklin .
Torquemada or Washington .
Torquemada or Rabbi Hillel .
Trial by Inquisition @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or Tyranny .

[Back in October 2019], Zuckerberg gave a talk regarding free speech. He has referred to Facebook as a technology company. He explicitly stated that “We are a tech company, not a media company.”
But then subsequently, in Congressional testimony, he gave a more nuanced answer:
“I view us as a tech company because the primary that we do is build technology and products. I agree that we’re responsible for the content, but we don’t produce the content.
“I think when people ask us if we’re a media company or a publisher, my understanding of what they’re really getting at is do we feel responsibility for content on our platform.
“The answer to that, I think, is clearly yes. But I don’t think that’s incompatible with fundamentally at our core being a technology company.”
Later, in filing a motion to dismiss the lawsuit from Laura Loomer, Facebook’s attorneys stated that “Under well-established law, neither Facebook nor any other publisher can be liable for failing to publish someone else’s message” and that referring to Loomer and others as “dangerous individuals” and “promoting hate” as constitutionally protected opinions of a publisher.
Zuckerberg in his recent speech at Georgetown stated:
“People having the power to express themselves at scale is a new kind of force in the world — a Fifth Estate alongside the other power structures of society.
“People no longer have to rely on traditional gatekeepers in politics or media to make their voices heard, and that has important consequences.
“I understand the concerns about how tech platforms have centralized power, but I actually believe the much bigger story is how much these platforms have decentralized power by putting it directly into people’s hands. It’s part of this amazing expansion of voice through law, culture and technology.”
“We don’t fact-check political ads. We don’t do this to help politicians, but because we think people should be able to see for themselves what politicians are saying.
“And if content is newsworthy, we also won’t take it down even if it would otherwise conflict with many of our standards.”
“I know many people disagree, but, in general, I don’t think it’s right for a private company to censor politicians or the news in a democracy.”
“Increasingly, we’re seeing people try to define more speech as dangerous because it may lead to political outcomes they see as unacceptable.
“Some hold the view that since the stakes are so high, they can no longer trust their fellow citizens with the power to communicate and decide what to believe for themselves.
“I personally believe this is more dangerous for democracy over the long term than almost any speech. Democracy depends on the idea that we hold each others’ right to express ourselves and be heard above our own desire to always get the outcomes we want.”
I take the liberty to quote Zuckerberg at length as I believe them to be of merit.
But that raises the question: is Facebook a technology company that promotes free speech and exists as a public forum exempt from liability?
Or is it a publisher with the right of censorship, the right to edit content as it deems at its discretion, whatever the methodology; but must then assume responsibility and liability?
To say you assume responsibility by declaring yourself exempt from liability is an absurd contradiction. It is the assumption of liability that binds the statement of responsibility.
As troubled as I am regarding the hypocrisy and contradictions of Zuckerberg’s words and Facebook policy and practices, it is more troubling that the technology community and many progressives have criticized his speech as they take a much narrower view of what speech should be protected and what speech should be permitted.
They have very nice words to use to justify their point of view: fake news, Russian bots, hate speech, intentional misinformation, political extremism, political ads that lie, divisive content, etc.
Essentially many believe technology should be used as a censor according to the criteria of who controls the technology company in partnership with a mob that wants to repress dissent. Those that want to control our words. Control our thoughts. Control our actions.
According to their perspective of what is right, just and moral. That they anoint themselves as the modern version of Torquemada. And make no mistake, it is an Inquisition. A strategy to dehumanize, delegitimize, and digitally exterminate those who disagree.
During the 1800 election where Jefferson challenged Adams, to a great extent because of the Alien and Sedition Acts, a newspaper supporting the Federalist Party (Adams) wrote that if Jefferson was elected:
“Murder, robbery, rape, adultery, and incest will be openly taught and practiced, the air will be rent with the cries of the distressed, the soil will be soaked with blood, and the nation black with crimes.”
Actually, most newspapers then were affiliated and backed by political parties and served as propaganda machines.
And the public was considered mature enough to process and filter the noise on their own. If there is doubt as to the intent of our founders, permit me to cite:
“If all printers were determined not to print anything till they were sure it would offend nobody, there would be very little printed.” — Benjamin Franklin
“If men are to be precluded from offering their sentiments on a matter, which may involve the most serious and alarming consequences that can invite the consideration of mankind, reason is of no use to us; the freedom of speech may be taken away, and dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep, to the slaughter.” — George Washington
“In those wretched countries where a man cannot call his tongue his own, he can scarce call anything his own. Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech; a thing terrible to publick traitors.” – Benjamin Franklin
“The press, confined to truth, needs no other legal restraint; the public judgment will correct false reasonings and opinions, on a full hearing of all parties; and no other definite line can be drawn between the inestimable liberty of the press and its demoralizing licentiousness.” – Thomas Jefferson
“To preserve the freedom of the human mind … and the freedom of the press, every spirit should be ready to devote itself to martyrdom; for as long as we may think as we will, and speak as we think the condition of man will proceed in improvement.” – Thomas Jefferson
And it is not only the founders who have expressed the sanctity of free speech without censorship, independent of its content.
“The freedom of speech and the freedom of the press have not been granted to the people in order that they may say the things which please, and which are based upon accepted thought, but the right to say the things which displease, the right to say the things which may convey the new and yet unexpected thoughts, the right to say things, even though they do a wrong.” — Samuel Gompers
“We are reluctant to admit that we owe our liberties to men of a type that today we hate and fear — unruly men, disturbers of the peace … in a word, free men. … Freedom is always purchased at a great price, and even those who are willing to pay it have to admit that the price is great.” — Gerald W. Johnson
“You tell me that law is above freedom of utterance. And I reply that you can have no wise laws nor free entertainment of wise laws unless there is free expression of the wisdom of the people — and, alas, their folly with it. But if there is freedom, folly will die of its own poison, and the wisdom will survive.” — William Allen White
Tyranny is defined as the arbitrary use of power or control. The oppressive power over the mind of man.
If so-called social media places limits on speech, censorship, then the right honest and accurate label should either be platforms that practice tyranny or publishers liable for the content that it’s editors decide to remain posted.
Technology, decentralized, without any controlling authority like bitcoin, liberates us. No censorship. Freely transferable. Independent of any third party. Absence of force.
Unfortunately almost all technology developed today has a controlling authority acting as a censor.
Which is fine if they acknowledge themselves as publishers and should be responsible, as all publishers are, by being liable for the content it chooses to publish.
Whether it is their words or the words others have agreed to submit and they have agreed to remain posted for all to see. This is the danger of centralization of power and authority.
Eliminates checks and balances. The end of due process. A challenge to the preservation of all our civil liberties enshrined in our Bill of Rights.
Where there is not contestability, there is little to no competition. A condition for a free society is political competition and economic competition. Free of persecution.
The reliance on markets and contract law entered into voluntarily. And the existence and recognition of inalienable rights.
If not, we breach our social contract. We punish dissent. We choose might makes right. We choose to impose on others, through tyranny of the majority or even tyranny without a majority
The choice is as stark as deciding what we stand for between the following:
I wholly disapprove of what you say and will defend to the death your right to say it OR
I wholly disapprove of what you say and will digitally exterminate you if you dare try to say it.
An only true public forum is censorship resistant. And censorship resistant can only prosper and nourish in an environment where ther is no authority entity, no controlling party. Permissionless.
Where permission is required and the party that grants consent is not contestable, tyranny exists.
Rabbi Hillel said “that which is despicable to you, do not do to your fellow.”
If you want the right to speak, express your ideas, express your opinions. Assert your point of view. Assert your beliefs.
And if it would be despicable to you if someone prevented you from doing so, persecuting you, dehumanizing you, deplatforming you, digitally exterminating you. Then it is despicable for you to do it to your fellow.
Censorship is despicable.
Torquemada or Jefferson. Torquemada or Franklin. Torquemada or Washington. Torquemada or Rabbi Hillel. Trial by Inquisition or Inalienable Rights. Liberty and Freedom or Tyranny.
By Jeffrey Wernick, News.gab.com


humansarefree--2020-05-23--600 Doctors Warn Trump: Lockdown Deadlier Than Coronavirus

Hundreds of doctors have sent a letter to President Trump warning that the nationwide lockdown is killing thousands of Americans @ @ @ @ @ more deadly even than the coronavirus it is intended to defeat .
Doctors understand that @ @ @ @ @ the patient to save the patient .
Also , homeschool moms in Lake Jackson , @ @ @ @ @ take their kids to the park .
City workers call the cops – but in @ @ @ @ @ know their Constitution and end up schooling both the cops and city officials .

Hundreds of doctors have sent a letter to President Trump warning that the nationwide lockdown is killing thousands of Americans.
It may end up more deadly even than the coronavirus it is intended to defeat. Doctors understand that you don’t kill the patient to save the patient.
Also, homeschool moms in Lake Jackson, TX, defy officials and take their kids to the park.
City workers call the cops – but in a twist, the moms know their Constitution and end up schooling both the cops and city officials.
Reference: YouTube Liberty Report


humansarefree--2020-05-23--Bill Gates Reportedly Offered a $10 Million Bribe to Use Nigerian Children in Coronavirus Vaccine Ex

Bill Gates Reportedly Offered a $10 Million Bribe to Use Nigerian Children in Coronavirus Vaccine Experiments

The left ’ s most beloved “ humanitarian ” has been caught in yet another human rights scandal , this time involving innocent Nigerian children who were to be used as human guinea pigs in one of his forced vaccination programs .
We are talking about billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates , of course , who reportedly offered a $ 10 million bribe to the Nigerian House of Representatives in exchange for gaining access to Nigerian children whom he could experiment on with a new vaccine for the Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) .
All the House had to do was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would have mandated the vaccination of all Nigerians with an experimental Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) vaccine created by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and its drug partners .
Thankfully , opposition political parties quickly rejected this proposed eugenics and possible genocide attempt , and even threatened the Speaker of the House with impeachment if he agreed to Gates ’ bribe .
It was the Nigerian Coalition of United Political Parties ( CUPP ) that says it intercepted a human intelligence report detailing how the Nigerian House of Representatives was right on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when the scheme was unearthed , bringing it to a halt .
The House was not only poised to pass the Gates bill , but it was planning to do so outside the bounds of the traditional legislative process .
In other words , it was a back-door deal done under the cover of darkness to advance the vaccination dreams of Bill Gates .
Listen below to The Health Ranger Report as Mike Adams , the Health Ranger , unpacks the plan to depopulate the world , in part through mass vaccination : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
In a statement , opposition spokesman Barrister Ikenga Imo Ugochinyere chastised the House for even considering accepting Gates ’ offer , no matter the sum of money .
He further threatened to unseat Speaker Femi Gbajabiamila for his complicity in the horrific plot .
“ Opposition Coalition ( CUPP ) has intercepted very credible intelligence and hereby alerts Nigerians of plans by the leadership of the House of Representatives led by Femi Gbajabiamila to forcefully and without adherence to the rules of lawmaking to pass the Control of Infectious Diseases Bill 2020 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which is proposing a compulsory vaccination of all Nigerians even when the vaccines have not been discovered , ” that statement reads .
“ This intelligence is coupled with the information of the alleged receipt , from sources outside the country but very interested in the Bill , of the sum of $ 10 million by the sponsors and promoters of the Bill to distribute among lawmakers to ensure a smooth passage of the Bill.
” Great Game India reports that the alleged deal to secretly and illegally pass this sellout bill was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a few months back .
The financial boost was later added to get the bill moving more quickly , and to get it passed by any means necessary .
“ Nigerians are reminded that at present , there is no discovered/ approved vaccine anywhere in the world and one now begins to wonder why the hurry to pass a Bill for a compulsory vaccine when there is none , ” Great Game India further adds about how a Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) vaccine does not even exist .
Meanwhile , Sara Cunial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spoken out calling for the arrest of Bill Gates .
She says that he is a “ vaccine criminal ” who needs to be handed over to the International Criminal Court to be tried for his many crimes against humanity .
Cunial also played a critical role in exposing Gates ’ genocidal efforts in India and other countries throughout Africa , which include plans to use vaccinations to deliver microchips into people ’ s bodies as part of his nefarious ID2020 program .

I don’t know about you, but I find Billy Boy to be one of the weirdest, most ghoulish people out there. Billy Boy is not a doctor, or a scientist, or a politician.
Yes, I am sure you already know this, but in this day and age, where he’s treated like all of the above, it’s worth repeating.
Gates is a really, really rich nerd who makes computer software, and mosquito nets, yet somehow he’s been hailed a “scientific doctor politician” who has an awful lot to say about our nation’s health and politics.
It seems like whenever there’s a discussion on COVID and jjabs and how to properly handle this “pandemic,” Mr. Gates is in the middle of that convo.
Many people find this to be disturbing, especially since Gates is infamous for his “population control” stance.
Sure, there can be a legit debate about controlling exploding populations in certain areas of the world where they can’t sustain a certain quality of human life, but when that conversation is presented by a guy who is pushing jjabs, it can understandably creep people out.
And further to that “population control” point, it doesn’t help Mr. Gates much when video clips like this surface.
Right now, we’re in the midst of a “pandemic” that many experts believe originated in a lab, and some even think it could have been purposely released as a “bio-weapon.”
Ex-Pfizer VP Says Experimental MRNA Vaccines Could Be ‘Used For Massive-Scale Depopulation’.
Of course, fact-checkers will say that’s not true, but people can believe whatever the hell they want because this is America.
On the flip side, other experts claim it’s not a “man-made” virus and it originated in a “wet market’ and came to us from animals.
Again, nobody knows for sure – not even the so-called “experts.”
We may never know what really happened with COVID-19, but watch this video clip, and you’ll discover that Mr. Gates certainly thinks viruses being released on purpose is a “thing.”
“An epidemic, either naturally caused or intentionally caused, is the most likely thing to cause, say, 10 million excess deaths.” – Billy Boy, 2017
Again, creepy… You can watch the video below:
This ghoul just spilled the beans "intentionally caused epidemic…" pic.twitter.com/Nd4w57P9gE — Amy (@RestingTwitFace) February 28, 2021
Also Watch: Billy Boy Admits To Human Depopulation Program
Billy Boy comes off as this really eccentric Napoleon-like character, with more money than God and he’s got his nose into all sorts of viruses and jjabs. It’s bizarre and troublesome.
And far too many people have given him a free pass to play “research scientist” and “doctor” when in fact, he’s neither.
I think it’s time for Bill to retire from the public eye and go be a recluse on some remote island.
I hear Epstein’s island is available. That sounds like a good place for him to retire.
If he wants to create jjabs, he can do it for himself and his family and leave the rest of us alone.
Source: PeopleAlwaysWin.com


humansarefree--2020-05-24--Study: Social Isolation Increases Risk of Death From All Causes

Social isolation is a word on the tip of everyone ’ s tongues these days .
Staying away from others during this pandemic is keeping us safe , but a new study finds that prolonged social isolation is also quite dangerous .
Researchers warn that socially isolated people are over 40 % more likely to suffer a heart attack , stroke , or other major cardiovascular event .
Moreover , the socially isolated are nearly 50 % more likely to die from any cause .
There was also an observed relationship between lack of financial support and increased cardiovascular risk @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Janine Gronewold and Professor Dirk M. Hermann from the University Hospital in Essen , Germany .
They analyzed data on 4,316 people ( average age : 59 years old ) who had been recruited for research between 2000 and 2003 .
All of those participants initially had no known cardiovascular problems , and were tracked for an average of 13 years .
Initially , each adult answered questions on their social support systems ( marital status , number of close friends , memberships in various groups , clubs , organizations , etc ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time that feeling lonely or lacking contact with close friends and family can have an impact on your physical health ” , Dr. Gronewold explains in a release .
“ What this study tells us is that having strong social relationships is of high importance for your heart health and similar to the role of classical protective factors such as having a healthy blood pressure , acceptable cholesterol levels , and a normal weight.
” “ This observation is of particular interest in the present discussion on the COVID-19 pandemic , where social @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in most societies , ” adds Professor Jöckel , one of the PI ’ s of the HNR .
Over the course of that 13.4 year follow up period , 339 major cardiovascular events occurred ( heart attacks , strokes ) , as well as 530 deaths .
Even after the research team accounted for other potentially contributing risk factors ( medical history , exercise schedule , etc ) , social isolation was still linked to a 44 % increased risk of cardiovascular events and a 47 % increased risk of death by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was associated with a 30 % increase in cardiovascular risk .
“ We don ’ t understand yet why people who are socially isolated have such poor health outcomes , but this is obviously a worrying finding , particularly during these times of prolonged social distancing , ” Dr. Gronewold says .
“ What we do know is that we need to take this seriously , work out how social relationships affect our health , and find effective ways of tackling the problems associated with social isolation to improve our overall health and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The study is published in the European Journal of Neurology .
The longest study on happiness , conducted by Harvard , came to the same conclusion : According to Robert Waldinger , director of the Harvard Study of Adult Development , one thing surpasses all the rest in terms of importance : “ The clearest message that we get from this 75-year study is this : Good relationships keep us happier and healthier .
Period .
”

Social isolation is a word on the tip of everyone’s tongues these days. Staying away from others during this pandemic is keeping us safe, but a new study finds that prolonged social isolation is also quite dangerous.
Researchers warn that socially isolated people are over 40% more likely to suffer a heart attack, stroke, or other major cardiovascular event.
Moreover, the socially isolated are nearly 50% more likely to die from any cause.
There was also an observed relationship between lack of financial support and increased cardiovascular risk.
The study was conducted by Dr. Janine Gronewold and Professor Dirk M. Hermann from the University Hospital in Essen, Germany.
They analyzed data on 4,316 people (average age: 59 years old) who had been recruited for research between 2000 and 2003.
All of those participants initially had no known cardiovascular problems, and were tracked for an average of 13 years.
Initially, each adult answered questions on their social support systems (marital status, number of close friends, memberships in various groups, clubs, organizations, etc).
“We have known for some time that feeling lonely or lacking contact with close friends and family can have an impact on your physical health”, Dr. Gronewold explains in a release.
“What this study tells us is that having strong social relationships is of high importance for your heart health and similar to the role of classical protective factors such as having a healthy blood pressure, acceptable cholesterol levels, and a normal weight.”
“This observation is of particular interest in the present discussion on the COVID-19 pandemic, where social contacts are or have been relevantly restricted in most societies,” adds Professor Jöckel, one of the PI’s of the HNR.
Over the course of that 13.4 year follow up period, 339 major cardiovascular events occurred (heart attacks, strokes), as well as 530 deaths.
Even after the research team accounted for other potentially contributing risk factors (medical history, exercise schedule, etc), social isolation was still linked to a 44% increased risk of cardiovascular events and a 47% increased risk of death by any cause.
Lack of financial support was associated with a 30% increase in cardiovascular risk.
“We don’t understand yet why people who are socially isolated have such poor health outcomes, but this is obviously a worrying finding, particularly during these times of prolonged social distancing,” Dr. Gronewold says.
“What we do know is that we need to take this seriously, work out how social relationships affect our health, and find effective ways of tackling the problems associated with social isolation to improve our overall health and longevity,” Professor Hermann concludes.
The study is published in the European Journal of Neurology.
The longest study on happiness, conducted by Harvard, came to the same conclusion:
According to Robert Waldinger, director of the Harvard Study of Adult Development, one thing surpasses all the rest in terms of importance:
“The clearest message that we get from this 75-year study is this: Good relationships keep us happier and healthier. Period.”
Source: StudyFinds.org


humansarefree--2020-05-24--UN Claims It’s Politically Incorrect to Say ‘Husband’ or ‘Wife’

The United Nations has put out a tweet asserting that people shouldn ’ t use politically incorrect terms like “ boyfriend , ” “ girlfriend , ” “ husband ” and “ wife ” in order to “ help create a more equal world.
” “ What you say matters .
Help create a more equal world by using gender-neutral language if you ’ re unsure about someone ’ s gender or are referring to a group , ” states the tweet .
It then lists a number of terms alongside their politically correct alternative .
These include mankind , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , boyfriend / girlfriend , manpower , maiden name , fireman and husband / wife .
A faceless globalist bureaucracy telling people what sounds are allowed to come out of their mouths surprisingly didn ’ t go down too well .
“ Stop trying to control people ’ s language .
It ’ s creepy and unnecessary , ” said Lucy Harris .
“ Are we allowed to say son or daughter or will my spouse and I get a visit from a police officer ?
” asked another .
Are we allowed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ my spouse and I get a visit from a police officer ?
“ Are we still allowed to say manhole cover ?
” joked another .

The United Nations has put out a tweet asserting that people shouldn’t use politically incorrect terms like “boyfriend,” “girlfriend,” “husband” and “wife” in order to “help create a more equal world.”
“What you say matters. Help create a more equal world by using gender-neutral language if you’re unsure about someone’s gender or are referring to a group,” states the tweet.
It then lists a number of terms alongside their politically correct alternative.
These include mankind, chairman, congressman, policeman, landlord, boyfriend / girlfriend, manpower, maiden name, fireman and husband / wife.
What you say matters. Help create a more equal world by using gender-neutral language if you're unsure about someone's gender or are referring to a group. https://t.co/QQRFPY4VRn #GenerationEquality via@UN_Women pic.twitter.com/koxoAZZuxq — United Nations (@UN) May 18, 2020
A faceless globalist bureaucracy telling people what sounds are allowed to come out of their mouths surprisingly didn’t go down too well.
“Stop trying to control people’s language. It’s creepy and unnecessary,” said Lucy Harris.
Stop trying to control people's language. It's creepy and unnecessary. — Lucy Harris (@Lugey6) May 18, 2020
“Are we allowed to say son or daughter or will my spouse and I get a visit from a police officer?” asked another.
Are we allowed to say son or daughter or will my spouse and I get a visit from a police officer?
— Wes Butler 🐝 (@WButler77) May 18, 2020
“Are we still allowed to say manhole cover?” joked another.
1) You've got too much time on your hands during global economic collapse;
2) You're grossly over-funded. See point 1. — Richard W. Jones 🧹 🏴🇬🇧 ➡ (@richardwjones) May 18, 2020
I’m so happy to be one of MANKIND. It must stink to be the CHAIRMAN of this sad group. Maybe some CONGRESSMAN will do something about it. If a BUSINESSMAN did this he’d be out of a job. At least the POLICEMAN will protect me from this liberal bs… — Sarah (@MissRosie2000) May 18, 2020
Are you going to comment on the missing indigenous girls in North America, the child brides across the world and the children of the Horn of Africa whose genitals are cut? — Sarah Stook 🦆 (@sarah_stook) May 18, 2020
Orwell called it Newspeak back on 1947. "…the ruling Party created Newspeak, a controlled language of simplified grammar and restricted vocabulary, meant to limit the freedom of thought—personal identity, self-expression, free will."https://t.co/iML6GH8YSY — Steve Bishop (@Stevebi27465893) May 18, 2020
Reference: Summit.news


humansarefree--2020-05-24--Former CBS Journalist Sharyl Attkisson Calls Out YouTube for Censoring Factual Info About Hydroxychl

Former CBS Journalist Sharyl Attkisson Calls Out YouTube for Censoring Factual Info About Hydroxychloroquine

Sharyl Attkisson , a former CBS reporter and current host of Full Measure , called out YouTube this week for censoring one of her reports on the controversial drug hydroxychloroquine .
Her video , which has since been reinstated , featured doctors discussing the media ’ s politicization of the drug and how that interferes with research into potential treatment or prevention against Covid-19 .
Sharyl : Camps largely divided along political lines .
Many right-leaning media figures sided with hydroxychloroquine while the left-leaning press backed remdesivir .
Each accusing the other of ignoring real science .
Dr. William O @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seen science politicized in 40 years of practice .
Several doctors have stepped forward to discuss the difficulty of attempting to study hydroxychloroquine in a hyperpolitical media climate .
“ We ’ re hearing now from some participants that the study and the drugs feel too political , and they just don ’ t want to participate at all , ” exclaimed Christine Johnston , a researcher at the University of Washington .
While researching the financial ties of several government experts in charge of drafting treatment guidelines for the virus , Attkisson @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Gilead , the manufacturer of remdesivir .
Another 11 were reportedly linked to a drug company and seven , including two committee leaders had direct ties to Gilead , and two were even on Gilead ’ s advisory board .
Sharyl : All three scientists criticized that VA report casting doubt on hydroxychloroquine as little more than a list of cases with crucial details missing .
It turns out one author of the report received research funding from Gilead , the maker of remdesivir , including a 247-thousand dollar grant in 2018 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to look at the money .
There ’ s no big profits made in hydroxychloroquine .
It ’ s very cheap , easy to manufacture , been around for 70 years .
It ’ s generic .
Remdesivir is a new drug that could be very expensive and very lucrative if it ’ s ever approved .
So , I think we really do have to consider there ’ s some financial interest involved here .
[ SOURCE ] YouTube has been notorious lately for censoring content which goes against the official stance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) or other governmental authorities on the pandemic .
Not only have famous interviews with David Icke been removed , followed by a subsequent ban from the platform , but an NBC press briefing with California doctors was taken down after receiving over 5 million views , and the film Plandemic featuring Dr. Judy Mikovits has been severely targeted .
Facebook has also been cracking down on coronavirus related content , as Sharyl highlights in an April Facebook post .
Upon sharing a documentary from The Epoch Times , Facebook ‘ fact-checkers ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the origin of the coronavirus , but the article used to ‘ debunk ’ her was written before the documentary had even aired .
“ When self-appointed fact-checkers intervene to try to stop people from accessing certain information , or to bully and controversialize those who report and read facts that are off the narrative powerful interests are trying to forward , it should be concerning to all.
” – Sharyl Attkisson Sharyl Attkisson is a tenured journalist and the host of Full Measure , a weekly news program aired on 162 stations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and is the author of multiple books , including Stonewalled : My Fight for Truth Against the Forces of Obstruction , Intimidation , and Harassment in Obama ’ s Washington , and her latest title Slanted : How the News Media Taught Us to Love Censorship and Hate Journalism .

Sharyl Attkisson, a former CBS reporter and current host of Full Measure, called out YouTube this week for censoring one of her reports on the controversial drug hydroxychloroquine.
Her video, which has since been reinstated, featured doctors discussing the media’s politicization of the drug and how that interferes with research into potential treatment or prevention against Covid-19.
Sharyl: Camps largely divided along political lines. Many right-leaning media figures sided with hydroxychloroquine while the left-leaning press backed remdesivir. Each accusing the other of ignoring real science.
Dr. William O’Neill: I’ve never seen science politicized in 40 years of practice.
Several doctors have stepped forward to discuss the difficulty of attempting to study hydroxychloroquine in a hyperpolitical media climate.
“We’re hearing now from some participants that the study and the drugs feel too political, and they just don’t want to participate at all,” exclaimed Christine Johnston, a researcher at the University of Washington.
While researching the financial ties of several government experts in charge of drafting treatment guidelines for the virus, Attkisson found that nine of them had ties to Gilead, the manufacturer of remdesivir. Another 11 were reportedly linked to a drug company and seven, including two committee leaders had direct ties to Gilead, and two were even on Gilead’s advisory board.
Sharyl: All three scientists criticized that VA report casting doubt on hydroxychloroquine as little more than a list of cases with crucial details missing. It turns out one author of the report received research funding from Gilead, the maker of remdesivir, including a 247-thousand dollar grant in 2018.
Orient: I think we have to look at the money. There’s no big profits made in hydroxychloroquine. It’s very cheap, easy to manufacture, been around for 70 years. It’s generic. Remdesivir is a new drug that could be very expensive and very lucrative if it’s ever approved. So, I think we really do have to consider there’s some financial interest involved here. [SOURCE]
YouTube has been notorious lately for censoring content which goes against the official stance of the World Health Organization (WHO) or other governmental authorities on the pandemic.
Not only have famous interviews with David Icke been removed, followed by a subsequent ban from the platform, but an NBC press briefing with California doctors was taken down after receiving over 5 million views, and the film Plandemic featuring Dr. Judy Mikovits has been severely targeted.
Facebook has also been cracking down on coronavirus related content, as Sharyl highlights in an April Facebook post. Upon sharing a documentary from The Epoch Times, Facebook ‘fact-checkers’ claimed that Attkisson posted false content about the origin of the coronavirus, but the article used to ‘debunk’ her was written before the documentary had even aired.
“When self-appointed fact-checkers intervene to try to stop people from accessing certain information, or to bully and controversialize those who report and read facts that are off the narrative powerful interests are trying to forward, it should be concerning to all.” – Sharyl Attkisson
Sharyl Attkisson is a tenured journalist and the host of Full Measure, a weekly news program aired on 162 stations. She has received five Emmy awards and is the author of multiple books, including Stonewalled: My Fight for Truth Against the Forces of Obstruction, Intimidation, and Harassment in Obama’s Washington, and her latest title Slanted: How the News Media Taught Us to Love Censorship and Hate Journalism.
Watch the full censored report on YouTube:
By Phillip Schneider, Waking Times / #jailBillGates


humansarefree--2020-05-24--EU Planning ‘Vaccination Passport’ Since 2018

“ Roadmap on Vaccination ” outlines 3 year plan for boosting “ vaccine confidence ” and advancing “ electronic tracking ” A report published by the European Commission in late 2019 reveals that the EU has been looking to increase the scope and power of vaccination programmes since well before the current “ pandemic ” .
The endpoint of the Roadmap is , among many other things , to introduce a “ common vaccination card/passport ” for all EU citizens .
This proposal will be appearing before the commission in 2022 , with a “ feasibility study ” set to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , as of now , it ’ s about halfway through ) .
To underline the point : The “ vaccination roadmap ” is not an improvised response to the Covid19 pandemic , but rather an ongoing plan with roots going back to 2018 , when the EU released a survey of the public ’ s attitude toward vaccines titled “ 2018 State of Vaccine Confidence ” .
On the back of this research , the EU then commissioned a technical report titled “ Designing and implementing an immunisation information system ” , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ plausibility of an EU-wide vaccination monitoring system .
In the 3rd quarter of 2019 these reports were all combined into the latest version of the the “ Vaccination Roadmap ” , a long-term policy plan to spread vaccine “ awareness and understanding ” whilst counteracting “ vaccine myths ” and combatting “ vaccine hesitancy ” .
You can read the entire report here , but below are some of the more concerning highlights [ emphasis throughout is ours ] : • “ Examine the feasibility of developing a common vaccinationcard/passport for EU citizens @ @ @ @ @ @ @ establishing comprehensive electronic immunization information systems for effective monitoring of immunization programmes.
” • “ overcome the legal and technical barriers impeding the interoperability of national immunisation information systems ” On the 12th September 2019 , at the joint EU-WHO “ Global Vaccination Summit ” , they announced the “ 10 Actions Towards Vaccination for All ” , which cover much of the same ground .
One month later , in October 2019 , Event 201 was held .
For those who don ’ t know , Event 201 was a simulated pandemic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ originating in bats .
It was sponsored by Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security , the World Economic Forum , and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation .
The result of the simulation was seven key suggestions .
In November of 2019 , these suggestions were published as a “ call to action ” .
One month later , China reported the first cases of Covid19 .
To be clear here ( and forestall any below-the-line arguments ) : this is not about vaccines , their effectiveness , safety or lack thereof .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which have been presented to the public as emergency measures thought up on the fly by panicking institutions , have in fact existed since before the emergence the disease .
They already wanted to monitor your vaccination records and tie that to your passport , introduce mandatory vaccinations and clampdown on “ misinformation ” .
They just didn ’ t have a reason yet .
This was a situation which required a crisis and , fortuitously , it got one .
The exact ratio of contrivance to happenstance will never be known @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this point , is that Sars-Cov-2 is nothing like the threat originally reported , they admit as much themselves .
We also know they keep churning out the fear anyway .
And , thanks to documents like this , maybe now we ’ re starting to see why .

“Roadmap on jjabing” outlines 3 year plan for boosting “jjab confidence” and advancing “electronic tracking”
A report published by the European Commission in late 2019 reveals that the EU has been looking to increase the scope and power of vaccination programmes since well before the current “pandemic”.
The endpoint of the Roadmap is, among many other things, to introduce a “common vaccination card/passport” for all EU citizens.
This proposal will be appearing before the commission in 2022, with a “feasibility study” set to run from 2019 through 2021 (meaning, as of now, it’s about halfway through).
To underline the point: The “vaccination roadmap” is not an improvised response to the Covid19 pandemic, but rather an ongoing plan with roots going back to 2018, when the EU released a survey of the public’s attitude toward jjabs titled “2018 State of Vaccine Confidence”.
On the back of this research, the EU then commissioned a technical report titled “Designing and implementing an immunisation information system”, on – among other things – the plausibility of an EU-wide vaccination monitoring system.
In the 3rd quarter of 2019 these reports were all combined into the latest version of the the “jjabing Roadmap”, a long-term policy plan to spread jjab “awareness and understanding” whilst counteracting “jjab myths” and combatting “jjab hesitancy”.
You can read the entire report here, but below are some of the more concerning highlights [emphasis throughout is ours]:
“Examine the feasibility of developing a common vaccinationcard/passport for EU citizens“
“Develop EU guidance for establishing comprehensive electronic immunization information systems for effective monitoring of immunization programmes.”
“overcome the legal and technical barriers impeding the interoperability of national immunisation information systems”
On the 12th September 2019, at the joint EU-WHO “Global jjabing Summit”, they announced the “10 Actions Towards jjabing for All”, which cover much of the same ground.
One month later, in October 2019, Event 201 was held.
For those who don’t know, Event 201 was a simulated pandemic exercise focusing on a zoonotic novel coronavirus originating in bats. It was sponsored by Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the World Economic Forum, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
The result of the simulation was seven key suggestions.
In November of 2019, these suggestions were published as a “call to action”.
One month later, China reported the first cases of Covid19.
To be clear here (and forestall any below-the-line arguments): this is not about jjabs, their effectiveness, safety or lack thereof.
The point is that proposed COVID countermeasures, which have been presented to the public as emergency measures thought up on the fly by panicking institutions, have in fact existed since before the emergence the disease.
They already wanted to monitor your vaccination records and tie that to your passport, introduce mandatory vaccinations and clampdown on “misinformation”. They just didn’t have a reason yet.
This was a situation which required a crisis and, fortuitously, it got one.
The exact ratio of contrivance to happenstance will never be known. What we DO know, at this point, is that Sars-Cov-2 is nothing like the threat originally reported, they admit as much themselves.
We also know they keep churning out the fear anyway.
And, thanks to documents like this, maybe now we’re starting to see why.
Source: Off-guardian.org


humansarefree--2020-05-24--Sweden: 19-Year-Old Man Killed While Trying to Stop Migrant Rape of Woman

A 19-year-old Swedish man was stabbed to death while trying to prevent a Sudanese migrant raping a woman at a party .
Media describes protest against incident as a “ Nazi demonstration.
” “ A group of migrants broke into an uninvited party in the town of Härnösand in eastern Sweden , ” according to reports .
“ Reports say a Sudanese migrant tried to rape a girl while a 19-year-old man tried to stop him .
The teenager did not expect the migrant to have a knife with him , so he stabbed him easily .
The migrant finally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ culprit was later named as 22-year-old Abubaker Mohamed , a Sudanese migrant who was granted Swedish citizenship in 2011 and had a long criminal record , including a 2015 conviction of raping a girl under the age of 15 .
The 19-year-old Swede who died in hospital from severe knife injuries was named as Tommie Lindh .
He was a supporter of the populist Alternative for Sweden party and friends said he had a strong sense of justice and always tried to come to the aid of those in need .
After the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ group calling itself the Nordic Resistance tried to hold a protest in Härnösand but authorities denied the application for the demonstration .
The protest went ahead anyway and was subsequently described as a “ Nazi demonstration ” by Sweden ’ s public broadcaster SVT .
SVT also completely failed to mention that the demonstration was against the migrant rape of the woman and subsequent murder of the 19-year-old man .
As we have exhaustively documented , Sweden has a massive rape problem due to its total failure to integrate migrants after sustained years @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sexual assaults have significantly increased since the country accepted a new wave of migrants in 2015 .
Ethnic Swedes will be a minority in their own country within 40 years , possibly sooner , with 10 per cent on newborn babies in Sweden currently having Islamic names .
Also read : 73 % Of Population Growth In 2019 Driven By Migrants , Swedes Continue To Leave Country Grenade attacks and deadly shootings in Sweden – concerns over which were once derided as a “ conspiracy theory ” by the media – now represent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a report by Quillette .

A 19-year-old Swedish man was stabbed to death while trying to prevent a Sudanese migrant raping a woman at a party. Media describes protest against incident as a “Nazi demonstration.”
“A group of migrants broke into an uninvited party in the town of Härnösand in eastern Sweden,” according to reports.
“Reports say a Sudanese migrant tried to rape a girl while a 19-year-old man tried to stop him. The teenager did not expect the migrant to have a knife with him, so he stabbed him easily. The migrant finally raped the girl twice more.”
The culprit was later named as 22-year-old Abubaker Mohamed, a Sudanese migrant who was granted Swedish citizenship in 2011 and had a long criminal record, including a 2015 conviction of raping a girl under the age of 15.
The 19-year-old Swede who died in hospital from severe knife injuries was named as Tommie Lindh. He was a supporter of the populist Alternative for Sweden party and friends said he had a strong sense of justice and always tried to come to the aid of those in need.
After the story garnered national media attention, a group calling itself the Nordic Resistance tried to hold a protest in Härnösand but authorities denied the application for the demonstration.
The protest went ahead anyway and was subsequently described as a “Nazi demonstration” by Sweden’s public broadcaster SVT.
SVT also completely failed to mention that the demonstration was against the migrant rape of the woman and subsequent murder of the 19-year-old man.
As we have exhaustively documented, Sweden has a massive rape problem due to its total failure to integrate migrants after sustained years of mass immigration.
Violent crime and sexual assaults have significantly increased since the country accepted a new wave of migrants in 2015.
Ethnic Swedes will be a minority in their own country within 40 years, possibly sooner, with 10 per cent on newborn babies in Sweden currently having Islamic names.
Also read: 73% Of Population Growth In 2019 Driven By Migrants, Swedes Continue To Leave Country
Grenade attacks and deadly shootings in Sweden – concerns over which were once derided as a “conspiracy theory” by the media – now represent a “national emergency” according to a report by Quillette.
Source: Summit.news


humansarefree--2020-05-24--Coronavirus Infection-Fatality Ratio Fact-Check Update

The more data we gather , the more obvious it becomes that early fatality rate estimates were MASSIVELY exaggerated .
We covered in our third of these brief articles that , actually , the Coronavirus is NOT “ 20x deadlier ” than the flu .
That was evident once the early large-scale studies had been done in Germany , Iceland and South Korea .
It has only become more so in the weeks since .
Far from the 3.4 % predicted by the WHO back February , or the 1 % used by the Imperial Model , all the serological @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at about 0.2 % .
Here are some recent examples : • On May 19th Dr John Ioannidis et al published their review of global cases , which found lethality ranging between 0.02 % and 0.4 % .
• On May 4th Dr Hendrilk Streeck et al published a study done in Germany which found an infection fatality rate ( IFR ) of < 0.36 % .
• Another study from Stanford University , published on April 30th and this time focusing on Santa Clara county , found an IFR of 0.17 % @ @ @ @ @ @ @ province of Iran , published on May 1st , found an IFR of 0.12 % .
• On April 21st , theUniversity of Southern California ( USC ) published their study on the population of Los Angeles county , which found an IFR of < 0.2 % .
I will include more studies below ( all show about the same fatality rate ) – and there hasn ’ t been a single antibodies study to contradict them : • the University of Miami study for the Miami-Dade county ( USA ) , • @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Washburne , which found that the coronavirus mortality rate could be as low as 0.1 percent , “ similar to that of flu ” ( USA ) , • The Mail said a similar fatality rate — 0.19 % — was found in a study of residents in Helsinki ( Finland ) , This list is far from exhaustive , visit SWPRS.org for more examples .
The Washington Times : “ COVID-19 Turning Out To Be A Huge Hoax Perpetrated By The Media “ Although the numbers do vary from place to place @ @ @ @ @ @ @ changes in demographics , healthcare , methodology , sampling , population density etc .
– it ’ s easy to see that not a single one of them comes anywhere near the 3.4 % “ officially ” listed by the WHO , or even the 1 % used in the Imperial model .
Other studies , done all over the world from Boston to the Czech Republic to Japan – have found the level of infection in the general population to be at least 10x higher than expected ( and sometimes 100s of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ specifics , ALL of the studies show that the danger of the virus was massively over-estimated .
Compiled with the assistance of Swiss Policy Research , who have done wonderful work putting together fantastic resources .

The more data we gather, the more obvious it becomes that early fatality rate estimates were MASSIVELY exaggerated.
We covered in our third of these brief articles that, actually, the Coronavirus is NOT “20x deadlier” than the flu. That was evident once the early large-scale studies had been done in Germany, Iceland and South Korea. It has only become more so in the weeks since.
Far from the 3.4% predicted by the WHO back February, or the 1% used by the Imperial Model, all the serological studies done to this point average out at about 0.2%.
Here are some recent examples:
I will include more studies below (all show about the same fatality rate) – and there hasn’t been a single antibodies study to contradict them:
This list is far from exhaustive, visit SWPRS.org for more examples.
The Washington Times: “COVID-19 Turning Out To Be A Huge Hoax Perpetrated By The Media“
Although the numbers do vary from place to place – as you’d expect given changes in demographics, healthcare, methodology, sampling, population density etc. – it’s easy to see that not a single one of them comes anywhere near the 3.4% “officially” listed by the WHO, or even the 1% used in the Imperial model.
Other studies, done all over the world from Boston to the Czech Republic to Japan – have found the level of infection in the general population to be at least 10x higher than expected (and sometimes 100s of times higher).
Regardless of the specifics, ALL of the studies show that the danger of the virus was massively over-estimated.
Compiled with the assistance of Swiss Policy Research, who have done wonderful work putting together fantastic resources.


humansarefree--2020-05-24--Unprecedented Level of Censorship – Is This the End of Free Speech?

( Updated below with proof of shadow banning and censorship ) – In the past three months , I ’ ve been an experiencing an unprecedented level of censorship from Facebook , Google , and Twitter .
Because I kept getting restricted ( i.e .
banned ) by Facebook for sharing on their platform and having a low reach for my entire website as a result , I decided to stop sharing for a period of time and see if they will lift my ban .
To date , this didn ’ t happen , despite contacting them a few @ @ @ @ @ @ @ got banned was for sharing this article – an article that was clearly not violating any of their community standards , – and I received an apology from Facebook after contesting their decision , but the shadow-ban was never lifted and the reach for HumansAreFree.com never returned , despite going as far as removing the article from their platform ) .
From the highest day in October , to the worst day in February , we can see that the number of people who visited my website dropped 23.6 TIMES .
Overall , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fewer people accessing HumansAreFree.com in the past 3 months , compared to the good months of last year .
After not posting anything on Facebook for 2 months , my ban has been lifted today briefly ( less than 30 minutes ) and I could once again see my traffic pick up .
My last post on Facebook was on March 18th : I was expecting my ban to be lifted around this date ( because it was briefly lifted a month ago , and two months ago around this date ) , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ record my traffic spike when they lifted the shadow ban , and then the expected censorship .
As soon as the ban was lifted , the traffic started to spike up , and over the course of less than 30 minutes , there were 1087 visitors online at the same time .
Then , suddenly , there was almost nobody online anymore : The next three screenshots are showing how many people were online after I got banned once again – almost nobody : Now , at the peak of my traffic ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ many people are online : Followers on Minds.com have notified me in the past couple of months that my articles are not being seen by any of their friends on Facebook : This is due a coordinated attack on free speech from mainstream social media , as well as Google search and YouTube .
Back in December , when I wrote the article “ Are We Allowed To Talk About Anything Of Importance , Anymore ?
” , things were not nearly as bad as they are today .
Since , LondonReal has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ most-watched interview ever removed .
David Icke has been deplatformed ( his accounts were deleted ) by both Facebook and YouTube .
This only adds to a very long list of dissenting voices who had been deplatformed by Facebook , YouTube , and/or Twitter , as well as banned by Google in the past year .
Is this the end of Free Speech in America ( and the all over the world ) ?
Please make sure to Subscribe to HUMANS ARE FREE via email , and please share my articles daily on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to your friends .

(Updated below with proof of shadow banning and censorship) – In the past three months, I’ve been an experiencing an unprecedented level of censorship from Facebook, Google, and Twitter. Because I kept getting restricted (i.e. banned) by Facebook for sharing on their platform and having a low reach for my entire website as a result, I decided to stop sharing for a period of time and see if they will lift my ban. To date, this didn’t happen, despite contacting them a few times.
(Last time that I got banned was for sharing this article – an article that was clearly not violating any of their community standards, – and I received an apology from Facebook after contesting their decision, but the shadow-ban was never lifted and the reach for HumansAreFree.com never returned, despite going as far as removing the article from their platform).
From the highest day in October, to the worst day in February, we can see that the number of people who visited my website dropped 23.6 TIMES. Overall, there’s probably around 8-10 times fewer people accessing HumansAreFree.com in the past 3 months, compared to the good months of last year.
Update May 24th, 2020:
After not posting anything on Facebook for 2 months, my ban has been lifted today briefly (less than 30 minutes) and I could once again see my traffic pick up.
My last post on Facebook was on March 18th:
I was expecting my ban to be lifted around this date (because it was briefly lifted a month ago, and two months ago around the same date), so I was ready to record the traffic spike, followed by censorship.
As soon as the ban was lifted, the traffic started to spike up, and over the course of less than 30 minutes, there were 1087 visitors online at the same time. Then, suddenly, there was almost nobody online anymore:
The next three screenshots are showing how many people were online after I got banned once again – almost nobody:
Now, at the peak of my traffic (in the morning) this is how many people are online:
Followers on Minds.com have notified me in the past couple of months that my articles are not being shown to any of their friends on Facebook:
This is due to a coordinated attack on free speech from mainstream social media, as well as Google search and YouTube.
Back in December, when I wrote the article “Are We Allowed To Talk About Anything Of Importance, Anymore?“, things were not nearly as bad as they are today. Since, LondonReal has been attacked by YouTube and had their most-watched interview ever removed. David Icke has been deplatformed (his accounts were deleted) by both Facebook and YouTube.
This only adds to a very long list of dissenting voices who had been deplatformed by Facebook, YouTube, and/or Twitter, as well as banned by Google in the past year.
Is this the end of Free Speech in America (and the all over the world)?
Please make sure to Subscribe to HUMANS ARE FREE via email, and please share my articles daily on your social media accounts and via email to your friends.
Thank you!


humansarefree--2020-05-24--Bill Gates Documentary Reveals Ties to Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein and Eugenics Movement

An independent media publisher named “ Grace ” who goes by reallygraceful on YouTube has produced what is the best documentary on the history of Bill Gates that I have seen so far .
I have never met Grace , and we do not necessarily agree with all of her commentary ( we don ’ t necessarily disagree either ! )
, but these 3 short videos , which have been very well produced , come with plenty of references to document the things she is revealing , and we will copy the references here as well , before YouTube @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Social Media tech giants are suppressing much of our traffic these days on places like Facebook , and our emails also are increasingly being blocked , so be sure to read my article about how to use RSS feeds to continue receiving our articles .
2019 Military World Games Opens in central Chinese City of Wuhan https : //youtu.be/u3UOKwIoXo0 via @ YouTube MIT and Microsoft Research made a ‘ smart ’ tattoo that remotely controls your phone https : //www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2016/8/13/12460542/mit-microsoft-research-gold-leaf-smart-temporary-tattoo ?
Billionaires Try to Shrink World ’ s Population , report says https @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Paralysis Rates with Pulse Polio Frequency in India https : //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121585/pdf/ijerph-15-01755.pdf Calls in India for legal action against US charity https : //www.nature.com/news/calls-in-india-for-legal-action-against-us-charity-1.13700 Controversial vaccine studies : Why is Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation under fire from critics in India ?
https : //economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/healthcare/biotech/healthcare/controversial-vaccine-studies-why-is-bill-melinda-gates-foundation-under-fire-from-critics-in-india/articleshow/41280050.cms ?
from=mdr HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World https : //www.researchgate.net/publication/320641479_HCG_Found_in_WHO_Tetanus_Vaccine_in_Kenya_Raises_Concern_in_the_Developing_World ( Great article linking to sources , very shareable– > ) Gates ’ Globalist Vaccine Agenda : A Win-Win for Pharma and Mandatory Vaccination https : //childrenshealthdefense.org/news/government-corruption/gates-globalist-vaccine-agenda-a-win-win-for-pharma-and-mandatory-vaccination/ Mutant Strains Of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wild Polio https : //www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2017/06/28/534403083/mutant-strains-of-polio-vaccine-now-cause-more-paralysis-than-wild-polio More polio cases now caused by vaccine than by wild virus https : //apnews.com/7d8b0e32efd0480fbd12acf27729f6a5 Accountability of International NGOs : Human Rights Violations in Healthcare Provision in Developing Countries and the Effectiveness of Current Measures https : //digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi ?
article=1205 & context=annlsurvey Bill and Melinda Gates pledge biggest-ever charitable donation – $ 10 billion – in call for ‘ Decade of Vaccines ’ https : //www.thepharmaletter.com/article/bill-and-melinda-gates-pledge-biggest-ever-charitable-donation-10-billion-in-call-for-decade-of-vaccines First Results of Phase 3 Trial of RTS , S/AS01 Malaria Vaccine in African Children https : //www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1102287 The Introduction of Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an Urban African Community : A Natural Experiment https : //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5360569/ Why is the Gates Foundation Investing in GM Giant Monsanto ?
https : //www.theguardian.com/global-development/poverty-matters/2010/sep/29/gates-foundation-gm-monsanto When Mitt Romney Came to Town https : //archive.org/details/WhenMittRomneyCameToTown-2011 Bayer : Need some heroin for your cough ?
https : //www.youtube.com/watch ?
v=_9uuzRXZakI Mitt Romney on Bain ’ s plan to buy and harvest companies https : //www.youtube.com/watch ?
v=0EsxNYXW5i8 Greed and Debt : The True Story of Mitt Romney and Bain Capital https : //www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/greed-and-debt-the-true-story-of-mitt-romney-and-bain-capital-183291/ How Mitt Romney Helped Monsanto Take Over the World https : //www.motherjones.com/food/2012/09/romney-monsanto-bain/ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ milk lattes to its menu in China https : //www.bain.com/about/media-center/bain-in-the-news/2020/starbucks-adding-plant-based-meat-oat-milk-to-menu-in-china/ Lives have been ruined – contaminated blood victims https : //www.bbc.com/news/health-48104413 How Bill Gates is Tied to the Success of Starbucks https : //www.lifedaily.com/story/how-bill-gates-is-tied-to-the-success-starbucks/ When a competitor tried to buy Starbucks , Howard Schultz was rescued by Bill Gates Sr. https : //www.cnbc.com/2017/10/04/bill-gates-sr-helped-howard-schultz-buy-starbucks.html Howard Schultz Insane Story about Bill Gates and his dad : https : //www.youtube.com/watch ?
v=iDHGgiTErAQ A Closer Look at Cheney and Halliburtton https : //www.nytimes.com/2004/09/28/us/a-closer-look-at-cheney-and-halliburton.html Agricultural Industry Secrets https : //usrtk.org/a-few-other-things-the-agrichemical-industry-doesnt-want-you-to-know-about-them-crimes-scandals-and-other-wrongdoing/ # _ftn38 Mengele Chemikal was part of Monsanto @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Meat and Impossible Foods ?
https : //www.scmp.com/magazines/style/travel-food/article/3015024/who-are-driving-forces-behind-beyond-meat-and

An independent media publisher named “Grace” who goes by reallygraceful on YouTube has produced what is the best documentary on the history of Billy Boy that I have seen so far.
I have never met Grace, and we do not necessarily agree with all of her commentary (we don’t necessarily disagree either!), but these 3 short videos, which have been very well produced, come with plenty of references to document the things she is revealing, and we will copy the references here as well, before YouTube removes these videos.
Also, the Social Media tech giants are suppressing much of our traffic these days on places like Facebook, and our emails also are increasingly being blocked, so be sure to read my article about how to use RSS feeds to continue receiving our articles.
References 1st video:
Billy Boy bio by David Marshall https://archive.org/details/billgates0000mars/page/n5/mode/2up
Bill and Melinda Gates bio by Sally Isaacs https://archive.org/details/billmelindagates0000isaa/page/n3/mode/2up
Billy Boy, Computer Legend bio https://archive.org/details/billgatescompute00bart/page/8/mode/2up
Event 201 Pandemic Exercise https://archive.org/details/og-event201
Event 201 Pandemic Exercise Highlights Reel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AoLw-Q8X174
Moderna Billy Boy https://www.modernatx.com/ecosystem/strategic-collaborators/foundations-advancing-mrna-science-and-research
Johnson & Johnson lands $1B government deal to boost coronavirus jjab capacity
https://nypost.com/2020/03/30/johnson-johnson-lands-1b-government-deal-to-boost-coronavirus-jjab-capacity/
2019 Military World Games Opens in central Chinese City of Wuhan https://youtu.be/u3UOKwIoXo0 via @YouTube
MIT and Microsoft Research made a ‘smart’ tattoo that remotely controls your phone https://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2016/8/13/12460542/mit-microsoft-research-gold-leaf-smart-temporary-tattoo?
ID2020 https://id2020.org/alliance
ID2020 Blockchain https://www.accenture.com/gb-en/insight-blockchain-id2020
Billionaires Try to Shrink World’s Population, report says https://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2009/05/26/billionaires-try-to-shrink-worlds-population-report-says/
Bill’s comment about divinity and human soul: http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1120657-2,00.html
Partnering for a path to digital identity https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2018/01/22/partnering-for-a-path-to-digital-identity/
Billy Boy, hypocrite? https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/06/bill-gates-preaches-fighting-poverty-hypocrite-microsoft-tax
Gates responsible for first computer virus https://www.historylink.org/File/10421
Billy Boy and Epstein, a closer relationship than admitted https://www.theverge.com/2019/10/12/20911488/bill-gates-foundation-jeffrey-epstein-meetings
References 2nd video:
Judge Says Microsoft Wields Monopoly Power Over Rivals
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1999/11/06/judge-says-microsoft-wields-monopoly-power-over-rivals/8c06ca6e-2344-4f8d-b391-68e7d94243ca/
Correlation between Non-Polio Acute Flaccid Paralysis Rates with Pulse Polio Frequency in India https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121585/pdf/ijerph-15-01755.pdf
Centre shuts health mission gate on Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/centre-shuts-gate-on-bill-melinda-gates-foundation/articleshow/57028697.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
Calls in India for legal action against US charity https://www.nature.com/news/calls-in-india-for-legal-action-against-us-charity-1.13700
Controversial jjab studies: Why is Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation under fire from critics in India?https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/healthcare/biotech/healthcare/controversial-jjab-studies-why-is-bill-melinda-gates-foundation-under-fire-from-critics-in-india/articleshow/41280050.cms?from=mdr
Anti-Fertility Vaccines https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2665354
HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320641479_HCG_Found_in_WHO_Tetanus_Vaccine_in_Kenya_Raises_Concern_in_the_Developing_World
(Great article linking to sources, very shareable–>)Gates’ Globalist Vaccine Agenda: A Win-Win for Pharma and Mandatory jjabing https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/government-corruption/gates-globalist-jjab-agenda-a-win-win-for-pharma-and-mandatory-vaccination/
Mutant Strains Of Polio Vaccine Now Cause More Paralysis Than Wild Polio https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2017/06/28/534403083/mutant-strains-of-polio-jjab-now-cause-more-paralysis-than-wild-polio
More polio cases now caused by jjab than by wild virus https://apnews.com/7d8b0e32efd0480fbd12acf27729f6a5
Microsoft Govt Partners https://partner.microsoft.com/en-US/Solutions/government
Microsoft Deals With Government: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/business/government
Accountability of International NGOs: Human Rights Violations in Healthcare Provision in Developing Countries and the Effectiveness of Current Measures https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1205&context=annlsurvey
Bill and Melinda Gates pledge biggest-ever charitable donation – $10 billion – in call for ‘Decade of Vaccines’ https://www.thepharmaletter.com/article/bill-and-melinda-gates-pledge-biggest-ever-charitable-donation-10-billion-in-call-for-decade-of-jjabs
First Results of Phase 3 Trial of RTS,S/AS01 Malaria Vaccine in African Children https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1102287
The Introduction of Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis and Oral Polio Vaccine Among Young Infants in an Urban African Community: A Natural Experiment https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5360569/
Why is the Gates Foundation Investing in GM Giant Monsanto? https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/poverty-matters/2010/sep/29/gates-foundation-gm-monsanto
Opening Ceremony of 2019 Military World Games https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCdAY-AOG-o
References 3rd video:
GMO Impossible Burger Tests Positive for Glyphosate
https://livingmaxwell.com/gmo-impossible-burger-glyphosate
Critics Challenge the Health Benefits of Alternative Meat https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-09-18/faux-meat-has-a-real-threat-with-opponents-attacking-healthiness
Billy Boy Beef With Climate Change https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpwJtdcYkAA&feature=emb_title
Bain Financial Statement Archives https://archive.org/details/407723-bain-capital-fund-ix-lp-financial-statements-dec/page/n7/mode/2up
When Mitt Romney Came to Town https://archive.org/details/WhenMittRomneyCameToTown-2011
Bain Capital Investments 1984-1999 https://archive.org/details/270240-db-prospectus/page/n18/mode/2up
Bayer: Need some heroin for your cough ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9uuzRXZakI
Mitt Romney on Bain’s plan to buy and harvest companies https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EsxNYXW5i8
Greed and Debt: The True Story of Mitt Romney and Bain Capital
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/greed-and-debt-the-true-story-of-mitt-romney-and-bain-capital-183291/
How Mitt Romney Helped Monsanto Take Over the World
https://www.motherjones.com/food/2012/09/romney-monsanto-bain/
Starbucks is adding plant-based meat and oat milk lattes to its menu in China
https://www.bain.com/about/media-center/bain-in-the-news/2020/starbucks-adding-plant-based-meat-oat-milk-to-menu-in-china/
The Starbucks Effect-Bain https://www.bain.com/insights/the-starbucks-effect/
Melusine (Alchemical Siren, Twin-tailed Mermaid)
http://symboldictionary.net/?p=1153
Lives have been ruined – contaminated blood victims
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-48104413 How Billy Boy is Tied to the Success of Starbucks https://www.lifedaily.com/story/how-bill-gates-is-tied-to-the-success-starbucks/
When a competitor tried to buy Starbucks, Howard Schultz was rescued by Billy Boy Sr.
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/10/04/bill-gates-sr-helped-howard-schultz-buy-starbucks.html
Howard Schultz Insane Story about Billy Boy and his dad: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDHGgiTErAQ
Bain Company Profile https://www.vault.com/company-profiles/management-strategy/bain-company
Breaking Down Bain Capital https://www.npr.org/2012/01/14/145235049/breaking-down-bain-capital
Bain: A Consulting Firm Too Hot to Handle? http://archive.is/qK0hu
Mitt Romney, Netanyahu are old friends https://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/08/us/politics/mitt-romney-and-benjamin-netanyahu-are-old-friends.html
A Closer Look at Cheney and Halliburtton https://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/28/us/a-closer-look-at-cheney-and-halliburton.html
Agricultural Industry Secrets https://usrtk.org/a-few-other-things-the-agrichemical-industry-doesnt-want-you-to-know-about-them-crimes-scandals-and-other-wrongdoing/#_ftn38
Mengele Chemikal was part of Monsanto
Who are the driving forces behind Beyond Meat and Impossible Foods? https://www.scmp.com/magazines/style/travel-food/article/3015024/who-are-driving-forces-behind-beyond-meat-and
Starbucks Drink Ingredients List https://foodbabe.com/starbucks-finally-publishes-drink-ingredient-list/
Romney, debt, and Bain’s way https://www.metrowestdailynews.com/article/20120130/NEWS/301309403
Sources: HealthImpactNews.com; YouTube.com; YouTube.com; YouTube.com


humansarefree--2020-05-25--The UN Just Launched A Website Called ‘New World Order’

Recently Spiro was joined by Helen Buyniski a journalist for RT , to break down the Rockefeller Foundation ’ s 2010 document titled ‘ Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development.
’ The 2010 Rockefeller document , particularly the ‘ Lock-Step ’ portion , laid out a scenario involving a global health pandemic .
The document ultimately came to the conclusion that the only way to mitigate a global pandemic was by implementing China ’ s hardcore authoritarian police state lockdown as the model worldwide .
And here we are today , as we find ourselves in this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Just about a month ago , on April 21st the Rockefeller Foundation released another document titled ‘ National Covid-19 Testing Action Plan Pragmatic steps to reopen our workplaces and our communities.
’ In this report Spiro is joined by Helen Buyniski to break down what the social engineers have in store for us in this Rockefeller blueprint document .
Spiro and Helen also discuss the United Nations New World Order website ( yes it is real ) in addition to recent reports of the CDC going door to door in Atlanta , Georgia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tests related to the Coronavirus and much more .
Just a couple of screenshots from the official UN New World Order website : This is extremely worrying : “ A new political order , and more broadly , a new world order for humankind.
” The UN NWO : “ Let ’ s take our planet back.
” Take the planet back from whom ?
This message doesn ’ t make much sense , unless the so-called “ elite ” plan to take the planet from us , the humankind .

Recently Spiro was joined by Helen Buyniski a journalist for RT, to break down the Rockefeller Foundation’s 2010 document titled ‘Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development.’
The 2010 Rockefeller document, particularly the ‘Lock-Step’ portion, laid out a scenario involving a global health pandemic.
The document ultimately came to the conclusion that the only way to mitigate a global pandemic was by implementing China’s hardcore authoritarian police state lockdown as the model worldwide.
And here we are today, as we find ourselves in this exact scenario, just a coincidence?
Just about a month ago, on April 21st the Rockefeller Foundation released another document titled ‘National Covid-19 Testing Action Plan Pragmatic steps to reopen our workplaces and our communities.’
In this report Spiro is joined by Helen Buyniski to break down what the social engineers have in store for us in this Rockefeller blueprint document.
Spiro and Helen also discuss the United Nations New World Order website (yes it is real) in addition to recent reports of the CDC going door to door in Atlanta, Georgia taking people’s blood for antibody tests related to the Coronavirus and much more.
Just a couple of screenshots from the official UN New World Order website:
This is extremely worrying: “A new political order, and more broadly, a new world order for humankind.”
The UN NWO: “Let’s take our planet back.” Take the planet back from whom? This message doesn’t make much sense, unless the so-called “elite” plan to take the planet from us, the humankind.
Source: YouTube.com