humansarefree--2020-07-06--Study Ordered by Austrian Parliament: EMF from Mobile Phones AND 5G Can Damage Eyes, Skin, Small Org

Study Ordered by Austrian Parliament: EMF from Mobile Phones AND 5G Can Damage Eyes, Skin, Small Organisms

The majority of scientists worldwide are opposed to 5G until there are studies that prove it ’ s safe .
Telecom companies have provided NO EVIDENCE of its safety .
Since 2017 doctors and scientists have requested a 5G moratorium on Earth AND in space due to biological and environmental risks ( see 1 , 2 , 3 ) .
Cities AND countries have also issued moratoriums as well as taken other action to ban , delay , halt , and limit installation ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 12 , 13 ) .
Research has already indicated that 5G exposure can be biologically harmful ( see 1 , 2 , 3 ) .
Other research has indicated that EMF exposure from various sources is also biologically and ecologically harmful ( see 1 , 2 , 3 ) .
A recently published Austrian study indicates the same thing .
The results of a study commissioned by Parliament on possible health risks from electromagnetic fields in mobile communications , especially 5G , are now available .
AUSTRIA .
The current study with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Health : The Current Assessment of the Evidence Level on Possible Health Risks of Electromagnetic Fields of Mobile Communications by Recognized Scientific Panels ” was carried out from August 1 , 2019 to February 15 , 2020 by the Institute for Technology Assessment ( ITA ) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences ( ÖAW ) .
The study authors state that , in principle , high electromagnetic field strengths can lead to tissue warming and thus tissue damage .
However , this risk has been taken into account internationally by determining and bindingly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and individual studies have already dealt with the question of whether electromagnetic fields from mobile radio from different generations can lead to health damage below these limit values and thus without demonstrable tissue warming ( so-called non-thermal health effects from sleep disorders to cancer ) .
However , the specific area of application of 5G is still unclear .
It was therefore necessary to clarify which parts of the population would be exposed to which new mobile radio fields and to what extent .
In principle , there are no relevant studies on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ created exposure situations .
The authors therefore recommend “ careful and preventive monitoring of the development and application of 5G ” .
For the international assessment of the risks from the application , the study authors state that the classification of mobile phone radiation as “ possibly carcinogenic ” is still controversial in 2011 by a recognized international body ( IARC ) .
All committees agree that there are still gaps in knowledge and ambiguities regarding the health relevance of high-frequency electromagnetic fields from established mobile communications and that there is therefore a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ eyes , skin , but also small organisms can not be ruled out .
Preventive measures and improved risk communication are necessary , the study says .
And there are no independent institutions for the necessary exchange of knowledge .
Speaking of knowledge : The next 5G frequency auction will take place in summer by the regulatory authority RTR .
Then urgently needed money flows back into the government treasury .
The frequencies 700 , 1500 and 2100 MHz are assigned .
Together they form the “ Multiband 2020 ” .
This auction @ @ @ @ @ @ @ space , the supply requirements will be in the foreground .
By December 31 , 2020 , all seven bidders must build 1,000 stations across Austria .
The three large mobile operators each have 303 stations .
As of June 30 , 2022 , each of the three mobile operators must operate 1,000 stations each .
Rundfunk und Telekom Regulierungs-GmbH ( RTR ) is 100 percent owned by the federal government .
Its core tasks are to promote competition in the radio , telecommunications and postal markets and to achieve the goals defined @ @ @ @ @ @ @

The majority of scientists worldwide are opposed to 5G until there are studies that prove it’s safe. Telecom companies have provided NO EVIDENCE of its safety. Since 2017 doctors and scientists have requested a 5G moratorium on Earth AND in space due to biological and environmental risks (see 1, 2, 3).
Cities AND countries have also issued moratoriums as well as taken other action to ban, delay, halt, and limit installation (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11. 12, 13).
Research has already indicated that 5G exposure can be biologically harmful (see 1, 2, 3). Other research has indicated that EMF exposure from various sources is also biologically and ecologically harmful (see 1, 2, 3). A recently published Austrian study indicates the same thing.
From Stop5G Resistance Network:
The results of a study commissioned by Parliament on possible health risks from electromagnetic fields in mobile communications, especially 5G, are now available.
AUSTRIA. The current study with the bulky name “5G Mobile Communications and Health: The Current Assessment of the Evidence Level on Possible Health Risks of Electromagnetic Fields of Mobile Communications by Recognized Scientific Panels” was carried out from August 1, 2019 to February 15, 2020 by the Institute for Technology Assessment ( ITA) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (ÖAW).
The study authors state that, in principle, high electromagnetic field strengths can lead to tissue warming and thus tissue damage.
However, this risk has been taken into account internationally by determining and bindingly setting limit values.
Numerous research programs and individual studies have already dealt with the question of whether electromagnetic fields from mobile radio from different generations can lead to health damage below these limit values and thus without demonstrable tissue warming (so-called non-thermal health effects from sleep disorders to cancer).
Many questions open
However, the specific area of application of 5G is still unclear. It was therefore necessary to clarify which parts of the population would be exposed to which new mobile radio fields and to what extent.
In principle, there are no relevant studies on the new frequency ranges and the newly created exposure situations. The authors therefore recommend “careful and preventive monitoring of the development and application of 5G”.
For the international assessment of the risks from the application, the study authors state that the classification of mobile phone radiation as “possibly carcinogenic” is still controversial in 2011 by a recognized international body (IARC).
Knowledge gaps and research needs
All committees agree that there are still gaps in knowledge and ambiguities regarding the health relevance of high-frequency electromagnetic fields from established mobile communications and that there is therefore a need for research.
Effects on the eyes, skin, but also small organisms cannot be ruled out. Preventive measures and improved risk communication are necessary, the study says. And there are no independent institutions for the necessary exchange of knowledge.
Next frequency auction
Speaking of knowledge: The next 5G frequency auction will take place in summer by the regulatory authority RTR. Then urgently needed money flows back into the government treasury.
The frequencies 700, 1500 and 2100 MHz are assigned. Together they form the “Multiband 2020”. This auction will also deal with the supply of space, the supply requirements will be in the foreground.
By December 31, 2020, all seven bidders must build 1,000 stations across Austria. The three large mobile operators each have 303 stations.
As of June 30, 2022, each of the three mobile operators must operate 1,000 stations each.
Rundfunk und Telekom Regulierungs-GmbH (RTR) is 100 percent owned by the federal government.
Its core tasks are to promote competition in the radio, telecommunications and postal markets and to achieve the goals defined in the KommAustria and Telecommunications Act.
Sources: ActivistPost.com; Meinbezirk.at


humansarefree--2020-07-06--If They Make You Wear A Mask, They Will Make You Take The Vaccine, And Make You Take The Digital Imm

If They Make You Wear A Mask, They Will Make You Take The Vaccine, And Make You Take The Digital Immunity Passport

If they can make you wear a mask , make you take the vaccine , then getting you to take the digital Immunity Passport will be a piece of cake , as the old saying goes .
You are being groomed .
I am not the world ’ s smartest person , and have never claimed to be , but it doesn ’ t take a genius to look at what ’ s happening right now , and then be able to rightly ascertain what will likely follow after .
After all , does not Solomon in all his wisdom @ @ @ @ @ @ @ under the sun ?
History is a fantastic barometer of what the future will hold , and there is nothing like a King James Bible that has recorded the history to show us what the future will bring .
So it is right now with mandatory mask wearing , you know what follows that .
“ The thing that hath been , it is that which shall be ; and that which is done is that which shall be done : and there is no new thing under the sun .
Is there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , See , this is new ?
it hath been already of old time , which was before us.
” Ecclesiastes 1:9,10 ( KJB ) My buddy Andy and I went to a local steak and seafood joint here in St. Augustine for lunch yesterday , we were celebrating the launch of a web page for the church , so we went to Schooner ’ s for a nice NY strip steak and sauteed onions lunch .
It was delicious , but let ’ s back it up to the moment we walk @ @ @ @ @ @ @ us that masks were now required if we wanted to sit and eat , which I thought odd because as I looked around the restaurant , no a single person at their table had a mask on .
Everyone was touching their face , some coughed , one sneezed , and no one seemed alarmed .
So I asked the hostess why I had to put a mask on .
She informed me the town now demanded a mask must be worn to be admitted into the restaurant , but could be taken @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tha… ?
?
?
?
?
?
“ And he causeth all , both small and great , rich and poor , free and bond , to receive a mark in their right hand , or in their foreheads : “ And that no man might buy or sell , save he that had the mark , or the name of the beast , or the number of his name .
Here is wisdom .
Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast : for it is the number of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Six hundred threescore and six.
” Revelation 13:16-18 ( KJB ) Grumbling and aggravated , we went to Andy ’ s truck , found two masks , put them on and went back inside .
Do you see what just happened here ?
No one was being kept safe from COVID-19 , no germs were being stopped from spreading because not a single patron had a mask on .
But what was happening was the city of Saint Augustine was grooming me , conditioning me to accept the order , and if I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the system .
Today it ’ s about a mask , tomorrow it will be the vaccine , and then the digital ID from ID2020 .
As of this writing , fines are being issued for not wearing a mask in Los Angeles , Florida , Massachusetts , Texas , New Mexico , with other states rapidly coming online .
But none of these states care one whit about you wearing a mask , it is about you getting in line and obeying the order , so that when the vaccine comes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to take it .
And if they can make you wear a mask , make you take the vaccine , then getting you to take the digital Immunity Passport will be a piece of cake , as the old saying goes .
You are being groomed .
( … ) If they make me wear a mask to have access to eating in a restaurant , I will do that .
But that is where my compliance begins and ends .
I will never take the vaccine , and I will certainly never @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
And yes , there will be a price to pay for that .
I am prepared to pay it , are you ?
Estonia ’ s government and some businesses including Radisson hotels are testing a so-called immunity passport as coronavirus restrictions are eased .
But the science is uncertain , and it ’ s been met with caution from the WHO and health officials .
Bill and Melinda Gates Tell You What ’ s Coming If these two people don ’ t scare you , you ’ re not paying attention @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you they are targeting the black community first .
Look at the looks on their faces , is it just me or are these people filled with demons ?

Dr. Anthony Fauci has now said that unless Americans are willing to take the rushed coronavirus jjab with “significant” side effects, they will be wearing the submission muzzle forever.
Even if enough submit to the jjab, Fauci wants us masked for at least 6 more months.
The masks will never go away until people wake up to what they really are: a symbol of submission to the controllers.
Fauci declared that face masks are here to stay unless enough Americans get the coronavirus vaccination, and even then it will take at least six months before the masks can be left behind, according to a report by ZeroHedge.
Speaking to Chris Cuomo, Fauci was asked if the masks could come off, to which he replied:
“Well, the answer is not unless you get the overwhelming majority of the country vaccinated and protected and get that umbrella of what we call herd immunity.”
Joe Biden wants Americans to wear the ritualistic shame muzzles for at least the first 100 days of his presidency.
"We as a nation need to continue to wear the mask, to keep the physical distance, to avoid crowds. We're not through with this just because we're starting a jjab program." – Dr. Anthony Fauci on protecting against Covid-19 while the jjab is being distributed pic.twitter.com/pSsLJoybYh — CNN (@CNN) December 11, 2020
Wake up. This is about control. It’s astonishing that people can’t see through this disturbing facade.
“There’s still a lot of virus out there,” Fauci declared, adding “So just because you’re protected, so-called protected by the jjab, you should need to remember that you could be prevented from getting clinical disease and still have the virus that is in your nasopharynx because you could get infected.”
“But until you have virus that is so low in society we as a nation need to continue to wear the mask, to keep the physical distance, to avoid crowds,” Fauci proclaimed.
New guidance from the World Health Organization (WHO) has also suggested that everyone should be wearing a face mask everywhere indoors at all times, as well as outdoors whenever they cannot keep more than a meter away from others.
This is coming as states and countries around the world ramp up their totalitarian controls over the public to attempt to hang onto whatever power they can grab before people figure out what a hoax this whole scamdemic has turned out to be.
By Mac Slavo, author of Survival Handbook: A Collection of Tips, Strategies, and Supply Lists From Some of the World’s Best Preparedness Professionals


humansarefree--2020-07-06--White People Are Being Prosecuted for Exercising Self-Protection Right

As I predicted 25 years ago in my book , The New Color Line , white Americans have become second class citizens under the law .
In the latest racist attack on white people , black women provoked an incident .
The pregnant white woman who was threatened and verbally abused by the blacks tried to de-escalate the situation but was not permitted to .
The white woman ’ s husband was fired from his job at Oakland University .
The University believes that standing up for oneself or one ’ s wife to black abusers is unacceptable behavior .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ pandering to and enabling black violence against whites by prosecuting the white victims and not the black perpetrators .
The outcome of “ racial justice ” is that the pregnant white woman ’ s husband is now unemployed and both face prosecution and prison sentences without a paycheck for a lawyer .
There will have to be blacks on the jury , and the blacks will demand conviction regardless of innocence .
So much for “ white privilege.
” It is going to get a lot worse .
Ordinary White Americans and their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ class .
White Americans are now living The Camp of the Saints .
The Fourth of July is when we hear poppycock about our rights and freedoms .
These patriotic speeches no longer apply to white Americans .
White Americans have been dispossessed of their rights , their self respect , and their country .
You can support Jill & Eric Wuestenberg who are being persecuted by the anti-white prosecutor , Jessica Cooper , by signing this petition and contributing to their legal defense .
You can bet your life that white people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to anything close to the extent that they poured money into the hands of Black Lives Matter .

The husband and son of Judge Esther Salas assigned the case linked to Jeffrey Epstein have been shot.
Epstein was an Israeli spy who ran a pedophile sex-trafficking blackmail network for high-level individuals in position of power. He is widely believed to have been “suicided” while in jail.
With the dramatic arrest of his partner Ghislaine Maxwell, who possesses the blackmail sex-tapes, a lot of prominent individuals are at risk of being exposed. Judge Esther was assigned Epstein linked case just four days back.
Family of Judge Esther Salas Assassinated
The husband and son of federal Judge Esther Salas were shot by a man who showed up at their New Jersey door in a FedEx uniform, according to New Jersey Globe and the Associated press.
Daniel Anderl, 20, the judge’s son, who is a student at Catholic University, is dead, the news site reported.
Her husband, Mark Anderl, is in critical but stable condition; the judge was not injured because she was in the basement at the time of the shooting, NBC New York reported.
“The FBI is investigating a shooting that occurred at the home of Judge Ester (sic) Salas in North Brunswick Township, New Jersey earlier this evening, July 19. We’re looking for one subject & ask that anyone who thinks they may have relevant information call us at 1-973-792-3001,” wrote FBI Newark.
News 4 New York reported that the gunman showed up at the judge’s home in North Brunswick around 5 p.m. on Sunday, July 19. It’s not clear whether the gunman was posing as a FedEx driver or actually was one.
“We are aware of the media reports and are fully cooperating with investigating authorities,” a FedEx spokesman told CNN.
The television station reported that the judge’s husband answered the door and was shot “multiple times.”
The son came to see what was going on and was also shot, that report said. However, there are conflicting reports about who opened the door first, father or son.
ABC News reported that “the judge’s son opened the door to the family’s North Brunswick home and was immediately shot,” quoting North Brunswick Mayor Francis “Mac” Womack as saying that Daniel Anderl was “shot through the heart.” He’s a Catholic University freshman.
CNN reported that Daniel opened the door with his father “right behind” and they were met with a “hail of gunfire.”
The motive and suspect are not yet clear. The suspect is at large. New Jersey Globe reported that the judge had been the target of threats but didn’t specify them.
Judge Esther Salas assigned Deutsche Bank Jeffrey Epstein case
Judge Esther Salas was assigned the high-profile case linked to Jeffrey Epstein just 4 days before her husband and son were shot.
According to Bloomberg, Deutsche Bank AG is being accused of misleading investors “about anti-money-laundering deficiencies,” including not properly monitoring high-risk customers, among them the financier Jeffrey Epstein, who died in a Manhattan jail cell while awaiting sex offense charges.
Epstein’s ties to high-profile figures like Prince Andrew and the manner in which he died have caused some to question whether his death was murder instead of suicide.
Authorities have given no indication that the motive for the Anderl shootings is tied into any of the judge’s cases, however.
The case was filed “on July 15, 2020, and has been assigned to Judge Esther Salas,” according to Globe News Wire. Bloomberg Law also reported that the case was assigned to Judge Salas. See the docket entry here.
Jeffrey Epstein – the Israeli Spy
Last year, one of the most high-profile Israeli spy network in the US was brought down by American intelligence. This secret high-society elite group was recently exposed on the global stage with the arrest of the sex-trafficking kingpin Jeffrey Epstein.
Welcome to the #HellfireClub – an 18th century British secret high-society elite club using perverted sexual desires as a cover to corrupt and infiltrate higher echelons of power in Govt (including India). The source of political sex-scandals.https://t.co/9uHKnSLNZo — GreatGameIndia (@GreatGameIndia) July 13, 2019
Although, Epstein is portrayed as just another billionaire pedophile, he was actually a high-class Israeli spy.
He used perverted sexual desires as a cover to corrupt and infiltrate higher echelons of power in government and businesses including in India (will be covered in the next part).
This is the source of political sex-scandals and video-tapes which surface now and then when someone refuses to obey orders.
Jeffrey Epstein was arrested again on July 6, 2019, on federal charges for the sex trafficking of minors in Florida and New York. He died in his jail cell on August 10, 2019.
The medical examiner ruled the death a suicide, although Epstein’s lawyers have disputed the ruling along with huge public skepticism about the true cause of his death.
J. Epstein & Co
According to hedge-funders, “Given this puzzling set of data points, the hedge-fund managers leaned toward the theory that Epstein was running a blackmail scheme under cover of a hedge fund.”
The seed-money for the hedge-fund came from a guy called Leslie Wexner, the founder of Victoria’s Secret. It is said back in the 80s, a billion dollars exchanged hands and a financial firm was setup called J. Epstein & Co, whose only publicly known client is Wexner.
Victoria’s Secret was used to recruit underage girls for Epstein’s operation.
The purpose of J Epstein & Company was to facilitate Jeffrey Epstein’s penetration of high-profile elite society and trap the victims by secretly video recording them for the “purpose of blackmail”. Victims included, the likes of Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew.
Hacked emails previously published by WikiLeaks show members of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign staff routinely monitored the news media for associations between Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein.
Former Israeli PM Ehud Barak spotted (2016) hiding his face as he entered convicted pedophile kingpin #JeffreyEpstein's Manhattan townhouse same day these hotties showed-up. Barak received millions of dollars from #Epstein for his company Carbyne. pic.twitter.com/Ijh5Ykn10D — GreatGameIndia (@GreatGameIndia) July 18, 2019
Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak himself was spotted in 2016, hiding his face as he entered convicted Jeffrey Epstein‘s Manhattan townhouse. Barak received millions of dollars from Epstein for his company Carbyne.
Ghislaine Maxwell
Jeffrey Epstein ferried young women on his island now known as the Pedophile Island on a boat named Lady Ghislaine.
Ghislaine Maxwell, who acted as Epstein’s business partner/madam is the daughter of Robert Maxwell the well-known Israeli SuperSpy.
Robert Maxwell working for Israeli Intelligence stole America’s state-of-the-art technology and even cultivated KGB connections to involve Israel in a coup to oust Mikhail Gorbachev.
The Little Black Book
All of Jeffrey Epstein’s high-profile clients maintained by his partner Ghislaine Maxwell, now arrested by the FBI are contained in a Little Black Book which include Mike Bloomberg, Richard Branson, top US politicians, British Royals like Prince Charles, the Rothschilds, George Soros and the Queen of England herself.
Here is the painting of the former President of America Bill Clinton found inside pedophile kingpin and Israeli spy Jeffrey Epstein's house. pic.twitter.com/inBd2sAtur — GreatGameIndia (@GreatGameIndia) July 3, 2020
It was reported that Ghislaine Maxwell sat on the Buckingham Palace throne during a private tour of the palace organised by Prince Andrew for former US president Bill Clinton.
A photo obtained by the Telegraph appears to show Ghislaine Maxwell reclining on the seat beside actor Keven Spacey in 2002.
Ghislaine Maxwell was also very close to Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan. The relationship between Imran Khan and the Rothschilds was exposed in a controversial memoir written by none other than his now former wife, Reham Khan.
Henry Kissinger is reported in the book to have categorically told the Pakistani foreign minister Sahabzada Yaqub Khan to “Look after our Boy”. When Sahabzada asked who their boy was, the answer he received was “Imran Khan”.
Eli Cohen
A similar intelligence operation was run in Syria by another Israeli spy Eli Cohen, exactly along the lines of the American op.
Eli was deployed in Syria in the early 60s where he infiltrated the Syrian political and military hierarchy and became the chief adviser to the Minister of Defense, at the time supported by the Russians.
The intelligence gathered by Cohen, who also met the same fate as Epstein led to the successful capture of Golan Heights by the Israeli military.
Source: Greatgameindia.com


humansarefree--2020-07-06--Covid1984: The Groupthink Pandemic

Covid1984: The Groupthink Pandemic

Groupthink is all around us .
Decision-making in government , in the media and at work .
It ’ s slowly killing the world .
In the background of the most important events , the Covid-19 response and increasing tension and conflict in the world , it might be worth looking through some of this in a bit more detail .
I ’ ve experienced groupthink working for large organisations , most notably in my last job .
We were tasked with investigating and solving complex problems .
Some technical expertise helped but was not crucial to the role .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ viewpoints was key .
Yet the organisation decided that this was no longer required and changed the whole operating model to a one-size fits all type of call-centre .
This new high-risk approach was recommended to us by the outside consultants Price Waterhouse Coopers ( PWC ) who were clueless about our business .
Those of us who were experienced in the role argued that the model wouldn ’ t work .
But the organisation ploughed on regardless .
It was obvious from day one that the financials didn ’ t stack up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ concealed .
The executive largely ignored our concerns to start but then paid limited lip-service when the wheels started to come off .
Anyway , in the end they offered us redundancy while employing fresh university graduates to replace us .
As far as I know the place is still in denial and heading down the pan .
Groupthink is described as follows : Groupthink is a term first used in 1972 by social psychologist Irving L. Janis that refers to a psychological phenomenon in which people strive for consensus within a group @ @ @ @ @ @ @ set aside their own personal beliefs or adopt the opinion of the rest of the group .
People who are opposed to the decisions or overriding opinion of the group as a whole frequently remain quiet , preferring to keep the peace rather than disrupt the uniformity of the crowd ’ .
Groupthink is common where group members have similar backgrounds and particularly where that group is placed under stress , resulting in irrational decision outcomes .
These are the main behaviors to watch out for : • Illusions of invulnerability lead members @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and engage in risk-taking .
• Unquestioned beliefs lead members to ignore possible moral problems and ignore the consequences of individual and group actions .
• Rationalising prevents members from reconsidering their beliefs and causes them to ignore warning signs .
• Stereotyping leads members of the in-group to ignore or even demonise out-group members who may oppose or challenge the group ’ s ideas .
• Self-censorship causes people who might have doubts to hide their fears or misgivings .
• “ Mindguards ” act as self-appointed censors to hide problematic information @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unanimity lead members to believe that everyone is in agreement and feels the same way .
• Direct pressure to conform is often placed on members who pose questions , and those who question the group are often seen as disloyal or traitorous .
There are two further observations I made in the workplace , particularly relevant to groups going through major change or/and a crisis .
Firstly , they tend to swing from the status quo to the complete opposite .
In our organisation , we definitely needed some changes and tweaks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was completely unsuitable and unsustainable operationally and financially .
The other thing I noticed was our employers became control freaks .
They started to talk down to us and our customers like children .
They introduced office slogans such as ‘ let ’ s crack on ’ or ‘ we ’ re all in this together ’ and deflected from the problems of the disastrous reorganisation towards ‘ celebrating diversity ’ in the workplace .
Critical thinking , creativity and expression were sucked out of the place .
The obvious analogy for all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when government ministers were collectively panicked into making extreme decisions on lockdown , using just one preferred source of ‘ expertise ’ .
At the same time , they sidelined dissenters and independent experts who could have offered a calm , rational perspective and a targeted response to Covid-19 .
In summing up this thinking and behavior , I ’ m reminded of these observations from Dr Malcolm Kendrick and Lord Sumption about the response to Covid-19 .
Dr Kendrick here : We locked down the population that had virtually zero risk of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and then spread it wildly among the highly vulnerable age group .
If you had written a plan for making a complete bollocks of things you would have come up with this one ” .
And Lord Sumption writing in the Mail on Sunday : A large organisation which has a high opinion of its news service .
But of course , the reality is the opposite .
There are so many groupthink case-studies but the BBC is as good as any , particularly in terms of making a bollocks of things @ @ @ @ @ @ @ some senior correspondents will no doubt be aware that they run a politicised agenda of bias and misinformation on a grand scale .
Outsiders who ’ ve researched their coverage will recognise this too .
But this won ’ t be obvious to the vast majority of BBC employees , the victims of groupthink .
This came across in some of Andrew Marr ’ s incredulous reactions to Noam Chomsky ’ s observations about the media during their interview : I believe the foreign affairs reporting of the BBC is where this problem @ @ @ @ @ @ @ impartiality has been completely absent from any reporting I ’ ve seen in recent years .
First , while not unusual in this profession , most journalists employed by the BBC will have a degree .
Typically , when you look at today ’ s ‘ top ’ BBC journalists , many have attended the elite universities which tends to create a culture of like-minded people of similar backgrounds .
This has been identified as one cause of creating groupthink .
Also , the younger journalists will be impressionable within the BBC hierarchy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ senior house-hold name journalists .
It ’ s sometimes said that there aren ’ t specific rules within the BBC and other media stating what a journalist can and can ’ t report and write and they generally don ’ t knowingly mislead .
But they will learn almost instinctively to self-censor and operate within a set of unwritten , unspoken rules and a strait-jacket narrative .
The other problem in foreign affairs reporting is that BBC journalists and most others rarely visit the warzones .
On Syria , they typically report from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a government or relatively safe terrorist or Kurd held area .
So unlike previous conflicts , such as Bosnia where I remember at least a tiny degree of balance , journalists seldom see what is actually going on .
Under the pressure of deadlines they rely on dubious sources such as Al Qaeda terrorists and Bellingcat and pre-determined assumptions which conveniently slot in with the anti-Assad narrative of the BBC and establishment .
Recently , some grave doubts emerged about the OPCW report on the Douma incident , a huge story which has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Stuart into a likely previously staged incident involving BBC journalists was swept under the carpet .
Both matters have been ignored because the BBC have no way or will to refute evidence which goes against their bias .
On the other hand , the BBC are more than happy to provide extensive coverage to more allegations against Russia and Trump from anonymous sources , providing no background or balance within the overall of climate of related allegations which have collapsed or are unproven .
And in recent days the BBC has provided coverage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s come from a script .
It ’ s well known BBC journalists are silent on malpractice .
We saw this with the Jimmy Savile scandal and decades of sexual abuse .
This attitude is similar to what I experienced with my employer who were very vocal and proud of their anti-bullying and mental health policies .
Yet when the staff were surveyed anonymously , bullying rates were through the roof .
The other obvious signs of groupthink within the BBC , particularly during the Covid-19 crisis , is dumbing-down and its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are idiots .
Another strong theme is a preoccupation with race and diversity , American affairs and general tittle-tattle , to the detriment of more pressing matters such as the longer-term and wider impact of the world ’ s current problems .
Covid-19 and our response to it is probably the most important event of our lifetime but there ’ s barely a peep about whether the response is necessary and proportionate .
Instead , this totally rational viewpoint is only ever mentioned in the context of BBC articles about Covid-19 ‘ conspiracy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I ’ ve described neatly fit in with groupthink behaviors and experiences I encountered in a large organisation .
But I think the biggest groupthink problem is with senior BBC journalists .
Ultimately their lazy arrogance has trickled down to the newer journalists and so over time , wrong behavior has been normalised throughout .
A few months ago Huw Edwards made some comments about accusations of bias directed towards the BBC , defending the corporation and journalists .
These are some of the specific comments he made which to me showed a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people have .
The BBC is not , to put it politely , run like some newspapers , with an all-powerful proprietor and/or editor making his or her mark on the tone and direction of the coverage [ … ] BBC News is a rather unsettling mix of awkward , contrary and assertive people who ( in my very long experience ) delight in either ignoring the suggestions of managers or simply telling them where to get off .
That ’ s how it works.
” Around this time , I also recall @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and he said that it was ridiculous to say that journalists within the BBC were willfully misleading the public .
His Twitter opponent replied that this was not what he had said and was simply stating that the BBC had fallen victim to groupthink .
Edwards just couldn ’ t get his head past this , while continuing to attack and misrepresent BBC critics .
This defensive attitude and stereotyping of critics is classic groupthink behavior in which he , Nick Robinson and others have taken part .
I used to admire John @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Iran post-revolution .
He wrote a book of the visit which I enjoyed .
But in recent years , he has shown that he doesn ’ t understand modern geo-politics and like the BBC can only assess it in terms of the ethno-centric British view on the world and our influence .
In this President Putin press conference he asked the most ridiculous question imaginable which confirms he ’ s lost the plot .
His question was about Russian behavior in the world and whether Putin wanted to create a new Cold War @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pointing out the hundreds of NATO bases and numerous wars which put Simpson ’ s aspersions into their rightful place .
Jeremy Bowen is another who has lost his way .
I saw a recent report from him from the position of a Christian militia unit fighting terrorists in Syria .
Again , BBC arrogance was on full display .
His report made generalised comparisons between him meeting Serbs in Bosnia in the 1990s and these Syrian fighters , clearly indicating that he doesn ’ t listen and is not interested in Syrian @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Helmets .
In the usual group-speak he described the Syrian Government ‘ the regime ’ and Al Qaeda as ‘ rebels ’ .
His report simply rubber-stamped the BBC coverage of the whole conflict .
This arrogance is typical of journalists who rely on their past achievements , creating an air of gravitas to impress their audience .
The reality is his reporting is based on no substance and outdated and lazy assumptions .
Ex-BBC nowadays , John Sweeney ’ s arrogance is off the scale .
These days he spends his time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Peter Hitchens accusing him of ‘ killing ’ his Mail on Sunday column readers with his views on Covid-19 lockdown .
Sweeney is off his trolley but the reality is he probably always was as this clip during his BBC days shows .
This behaviour , extreme as it is , certainly suggests groupthink played a big part somewhere in his career .
BBC Dateline is a current affairs TV panel discussion which I occasionally watched .
The panel which changed regularly were seemingly well qualified with foreign writers and journalists which included @ @ @ @ @ @ @ around that table they gave the impression of people who knew what they were talking about .
However , when you listened carefully to what they were saying , there was very little substance .
Their arguments , all based on a simple premise that Russia/Syria are bad , the West is good , tempered with a little occasional criticism of western policy to give the illusion of balance .
Occasionally you would have a more pro-Russia expert on but with the prevailing consensus of the rest of the panel , his or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ got to the point any dissenting panel member started to self-censor to sound more credible , perhaps to remain on the panel .
This is the dilemma for any progressively minded BBC guest nowadays .
Peter Hitchens who complains the BBC never invite him on , appeared on Good Morning Britain ( GMB ) recently .
As is normal with many GMB debates , the discussion on Covid-19 descended to retorts and abuse and was simply not the forum for Hitchens to get across his well thought out points on the big picture @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he would have fared any better on the BBC .
The BBC create an illusion of civilised , intelligent discussion but the reality is there is no substance , depth or balance .
The crucial discussion points about Covid-19 or conflict in the world don ’ t get a hearing .
The premise and the rules are already set in stone before the guests arrive .
There are many reasons why the world is in its current madness and on the brink of serious conflict .
Groupthink in government , the media and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ factor as this represents the thinking culture alongside and below the psychopaths and war criminals who pull the strings .
It ’ s almost impossible to break this cycle by chipping away at it .
But it ’ s possible a large event connected to Covid-19 or a major war will be the catalyst which might shock us out of our distorted view of reality .
In the meantime , independent commentators and ex-MSM like Peter Hitchens , Anna Brees and Tareq Haddad , are putting their careers on the line and self-interests @ @ @ @ @ @ @ employed by the BBC and other media to be brave and do the same .
Certainly , the consequences will be far more disastrous doing nothing and not speaking up .
In the sudden , new founded willingness to demonstrate on the streets perhaps those participating might be better reflecting on who and what the real enemy is .
Groupthink , escalating world conflict , All Lives Matter , including Syrians , Libyans , Palestinians and Blacks , ( including those outside of US , UK and Europe ) together with the post-Covid-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ , are the issues which matter right now .

Groupthink is all around us. Decision-making in government, in the media and at work. It’s slowly killing the world.
In the background of the most important events, the Covid-19 response and increasing tension and conflict in the world, it might be worth looking through some of this in a bit more detail.
I’ve experienced groupthink working for large organisations, most notably in my last job. We were tasked with investigating and solving complex problems. Some technical expertise helped but was not crucial to the role.
Critical thinking and balancing evidence and differing viewpoints was key.
Yet the organisation decided that this was no longer required and changed the whole operating model to a one-size fits all type of call-centre. This new high-risk approach was recommended to us by the outside consultants Price Waterhouse Coopers (PWC) who were clueless about our business.
Those of us who were experienced in the role argued that the model wouldn’t work. But the organisation ploughed on regardless. It was obvious from day one that the financials didn’t stack up which they tried to deny and later concealed.
The executive largely ignored our concerns to start but then paid limited lip-service when the wheels started to come off. Anyway, in the end they offered us redundancy while employing fresh university graduates to replace us. As far as I know the place is still in denial and heading down the pan.
Groupthink is described as follows:
Groupthink is a term first used in 1972 by social psychologist Irving L. Janis that refers to a psychological phenomenon in which people strive for consensus within a group. In many cases, people will set aside their own personal beliefs or adopt the opinion of the rest of the group.
People who are opposed to the decisions or overriding opinion of the group as a whole frequently remain quiet, preferring to keep the peace rather than disrupt the uniformity of the crowd’.
Groupthink is common where group members have similar backgrounds and particularly where that group is placed under stress, resulting in irrational decision outcomes.
These are the main behaviors to watch out for:
Illusions of invulnerability lead members of the group to be overly optimistic and engage in risk-taking. Unquestioned beliefs lead members to ignore possible moral problems and ignore the consequences of individual and group actions. Rationalising prevents members from reconsidering their beliefs and causes them to ignore warning signs. Stereotyping leads members of the in-group to ignore or even demonise out-group members who may oppose or challenge the group’s ideas. Self-censorship causes people who might have doubts to hide their fears or misgivings. “Mindguards” act as self-appointed censors to hide problematic information from the group. Illusions of unanimity lead members to believe that everyone is in agreement and feels the same way. Direct pressure to conform is often placed on members who pose questions, and those who question the group are often seen as disloyal or traitorous.
There are two further observations I made in the workplace, particularly relevant to groups going through major change or/and a crisis.
Firstly, they tend to swing from the status quo to the complete opposite. In our organisation, we definitely needed some changes and tweaks but we lurched towards a model which was completely unsuitable and unsustainable operationally and financially.
The other thing I noticed was our employers became control freaks. They started to talk down to us and our customers like children. They introduced office slogans such as ‘let’s crack on’ or ‘we’re all in this together’ and deflected from the problems of the disastrous reorganisation towards ‘celebrating diversity’ in the workplace. Critical thinking, creativity and expression were sucked out of the place.
The obvious analogy for all these behaviors is the response to Covid-19 when government ministers were collectively panicked into making extreme decisions on lockdown, using just one preferred source of ‘expertise’.
At the same time, they sidelined dissenters and independent experts who could have offered a calm, rational perspective and a targeted response to Covid-19.
In summing up this thinking and behavior, I’m reminded of these observations from Dr Malcolm Kendrick and Lord Sumption about the response to Covid-19. Dr Kendrick here:
We locked down the population that had virtually zero risk of getting any serious problems from the disease, and then spread it wildly among the highly vulnerable age group. If you had written a plan for making a complete bollocks of things you would have come up with this one”.
And Lord Sumption writing in the Mail on Sunday:
The Prime Minister, who in practice makes most of the decisions, has low political cunning but no governmental skills whatever. He is incapable of studying a complex problem in depth. He thinks as he speaks – in slogans. These people have no idea what they are doing, because they are unable to think about more than one thing at a time or to look further ahead than the end of their noses.
The BBC – a case-study
A large organisation which has a high opinion of its news service. But of course, the reality is the opposite. There are so many groupthink case-studies but the BBC is as good as any, particularly in terms of making a bollocks of things.
The executives at the BBC and some senior correspondents will no doubt be aware that they run a politicised agenda of bias and misinformation on a grand scale. Outsiders who’ve researched their coverage will recognise this too. But this won’t be obvious to the vast majority of BBC employees, the victims of groupthink.
This came across in some of Andrew Marr’s incredulous reactions to Noam Chomsky’s observations about the media during their interview:
Andrew Marr: How can you know I’m self-censoring? Noam Chomsky: I’m not saying you’re self-censoring. I’m sure you believe everything you say. But what I’m saying is if you believed something different you wouldn’t be sitting where you’re sitting.
I believe the foreign affairs reporting of the BBC is where this problem stands out most. Real expertise and impartiality has been completely absent from any reporting I’ve seen in recent years.
First, while not unusual in this profession, most journalists employed by the BBC will have a degree. Typically, when you look at today’s ‘top’ BBC journalists, many have attended the elite universities which tends to create a culture of like-minded people of similar backgrounds. This has been identified as one cause of creating groupthink.
Also, the younger journalists will be impressionable within the BBC hierarchy to the views and ways of the senior house-hold name journalists.
It’s sometimes said that there aren’t specific rules within the BBC and other media stating what a journalist can and can’t report and write and they generally don’t knowingly mislead. But they will learn almost instinctively to self-censor and operate within a set of unwritten, unspoken rules and a strait-jacket narrative.
The other problem in foreign affairs reporting is that BBC journalists and most others rarely visit the warzones. On Syria, they typically report from Lebanon or Turkey only occasionally venturing into a government or relatively safe terrorist or Kurd held area. So unlike previous conflicts, such as Bosnia where I remember at least a tiny degree of balance, journalists seldom see what is actually going on.
Under the pressure of deadlines they rely on dubious sources such as Al Qaeda terrorists and Bellingcat and pre-determined assumptions which conveniently slot in with the anti-Assad narrative of the BBC and establishment.
Recently, some grave doubts emerged about the OPCW report on the Douma incident, a huge story which has wider implications.
The investigations of Robert Stuart into a likely previously staged incident involving BBC journalists was swept under the carpet. Both matters have been ignored because the BBC have no way or will to refute evidence which goes against their bias.
On the other hand, the BBC are more than happy to provide extensive coverage to more allegations against Russia and Trump from anonymous sources, providing no background or balance within the overall of climate of related allegations which have collapsed or are unproven.
And in recent days the BBC has provided coverage on Hong Kong which looks like it’s come from a script.
It’s well known BBC journalists are silent on malpractice. We saw this with the Jimmy Savile scandal and decades of sexual abuse. This attitude is similar to what I experienced with my employer who were very vocal and proud of their anti-bullying and mental health policies. Yet when the staff were surveyed anonymously, bullying rates were through the roof.
The other obvious signs of groupthink within the BBC, particularly during the Covid-19 crisis, is dumbing-down and its slogan-filled website written as though their readers are idiots.
Another strong theme is a preoccupation with race and diversity, American affairs and general tittle-tattle, to the detriment of more pressing matters such as the longer-term and wider impact of the world’s current problems.
Covid-19 and our response to it is probably the most important event of our lifetime but there’s barely a peep about whether the response is necessary and proportionate. Instead, this totally rational viewpoint is only ever mentioned in the context of BBC articles about Covid-19 ‘conspiracy theories’.
Many of the examples I’ve described neatly fit in with groupthink behaviors and experiences I encountered in a large organisation.
But I think the biggest groupthink problem is with senior BBC journalists. Ultimately their lazy arrogance has trickled down to the newer journalists and so over time, wrong behavior has been normalised throughout.
The BBC ‘Grandees’
A few months ago Huw Edwards made some comments about accusations of bias directed towards the BBC, defending the corporation and journalists. These are some of the specific comments he made which to me showed a complete lack of understanding of the concerns people have.
The BBC is not, to put it politely, run like some newspapers, with an all-powerful proprietor and/or editor making his or her mark on the tone and direction of the coverage […] BBC News is a rather unsettling mix of awkward, contrary and assertive people who (in my very long experience) delight in either ignoring the suggestions of managers or simply telling them where to get off. That’s how it works.”
Around this time, I also recall Edwards arguing on Twitter on the subject and he said that it was ridiculous to say that journalists within the BBC were willfully misleading the public. His Twitter opponent replied that this was not what he had said and was simply stating that the BBC had fallen victim to groupthink. Edwards just couldn’t get his head past this, while continuing to attack and misrepresent BBC critics.
This defensive attitude and stereotyping of critics is classic groupthink behavior in which he, Nick Robinson and others have taken part.
I used to admire John Simpson and in the 1980s he visited Iran post-revolution. He wrote a book of the visit which I enjoyed. But in recent years, he has shown that he doesn’t understand modern geo-politics and like the BBC can only assess it in terms of the ethno-centric British view on the world and our influence.
In this President Putin press conference he asked the most ridiculous question imaginable which confirms he’s lost the plot. His question was about Russian behavior in the world and whether Putin wanted to create a new Cold War.
Putin wiped the floor with him pointing out the hundreds of NATO bases and numerous wars which put Simpson’s aspersions into their rightful place.
Jeremy Bowen is another who has lost his way. I saw a recent report from him from the position of a Christian militia unit fighting terrorists in Syria.
Again, BBC arrogance was on full display. His report made generalised comparisons between him meeting Serbs in Bosnia in the 1990s and these Syrian fighters, clearly indicating that he doesn’t listen and is not interested in Syrian views on western complicity and the White Helmets.
In the usual group-speak he described the Syrian Government ‘the regime’ and Al Qaeda as ‘rebels’. His report simply rubber-stamped the BBC coverage of the whole conflict.
This arrogance is typical of journalists who rely on their past achievements, creating an air of gravitas to impress their audience. The reality is his reporting is based on no substance and outdated and lazy assumptions.
The madness of John Sweeney
Ex-BBC nowadays, John Sweeney’s arrogance is off the scale. These days he spends his time on Twitter attacking lockdown sceptics, like Peter Hitchens accusing him of ‘killing’ his Mail on Sunday column readers with his views on Covid-19 lockdown.
Sweeney is off his trolley but the reality is he probably always was as this clip during his BBC days shows.
This behaviour, extreme as it is, certainly suggests groupthink played a big part somewhere in his career.
An illusion of sanity
BBC Dateline is a current affairs TV panel discussion which I occasionally watched. The panel which changed regularly were seemingly well qualified with foreign writers and journalists which included Russia or Arab affairs experts.
Sitting around that table they gave the impression of people who knew what they were talking about.
However, when you listened carefully to what they were saying, there was very little substance. Their arguments, all based on a simple premise that Russia/Syria are bad, the West is good, tempered with a little occasional criticism of western policy to give the illusion of balance.
Occasionally you would have a more pro-Russia expert on but with the prevailing consensus of the rest of the panel, his or her views would be ridiculed. It got to the point any dissenting panel member started to self-censor to sound more credible, perhaps to remain on the panel. This is the dilemma for any progressively minded BBC guest nowadays.
Peter Hitchens who complains the BBC never invite him on, appeared on Good Morning Britain (GMB) recently. As is normal with many GMB debates, the discussion on Covid-19 descended to retorts and abuse and was simply not the forum for Hitchens to get across his well thought out points on the big picture.
But I don’t think he would have fared any better on the BBC. The BBC create an illusion of civilised, intelligent discussion but the reality is there is no substance, depth or balance. The crucial discussion points about Covid-19 or conflict in the world don’t get a hearing. The premise and the rules are already set in stone before the guests arrive.
Final thoughts
There are many reasons why the world is in its current madness and on the brink of serious conflict.
Groupthink in government, the media and the general public is probably a key factor as this represents the thinking culture alongside and below the psychopaths and war criminals who pull the strings.
It’s almost impossible to break this cycle by chipping away at it. But it’s possible a large event connected to Covid-19 or a major war will be the catalyst which might shock us out of our distorted view of reality.
In the meantime, independent commentators and ex-MSM like Peter Hitchens, Anna Brees and Tareq Haddad, are putting their careers on the line and self-interests aside. We can only encourage others employed by the BBC and other media to be brave and do the same.
Certainly, the consequences will be far more disastrous doing nothing and not speaking up.
In the sudden, new founded willingness to demonstrate on the streets perhaps those participating might be better reflecting on who and what the real enemy is.
Party politics, Brexit and Black Lives Matter really don’t matter.
Groupthink, escalating world conflict, All Lives Matter, including Syrians, Libyans, Palestinians and Blacks,(including those outside of US,UK and Europe) together with the post-Covid-19 march to an uncertain ‘new normal’, are the issues which matter right now.


humansarefree--2020-07-06--UN Declares World Peace

UN Declares World Peace

Kumbaya and pass the bubbly !
World peace has been achieved !
What , haven ’ t you heard ?
The UN Security Council just passed a resolution that calls for a global ceasefire as a type of “ humanitarian pause ” while the world deals with the coronavirus pandemic that ( we are told ) is wreaking such havoc on the human population .
Or , as the UN puts it : The Security Council on Wednesday echoed the Secretary-General ’ s call for a worldwide ceasefire , to combat the coronavirus pandemic that has already claimed more than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chief welcomed the long-awaited move , calling for countries to “ redouble their efforts for peace ” .
This tells us three things : • None Our noble leaders love us and care for us and want to protect us during this time of crisis .
• None The pandemic must be real and it must be supremely grave , because why else would the Security Council be acting like this ?
• None We can expect the next 90 days to be a heaven on earth where the nations of the world @ @ @ @ @ @ @ peace and harmony .
Well , not exactly .
You see , the resolution asks member nations to cease all of their military operations except “ military operations against Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant ( ISIL/Da ’ esh ) , Al-Qaida and Al-Nusra Front , and all other individuals , groups , undertakings and entities associated with Al-Qaida or ISIL , and other Council-designated terrorist groups.
” But other than that wee little asterisk , that ’ s it .
War is done-zo !
.
.
.
For three months , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ did the Saudis just launch a fresh military campaign against the Yemenis ?
Didn ’ t they get the memo ?
What on earth is going on here ?
Let ’ s start by examining the idea of a global 90-day ceasefire ( except if you ’ re fighting the really bad guys ) .
Is this supposed to signal to the rest of the world that bombing and violence and bloodshed is OK as long as it doesn ’ t distract people from panicking about the Official Bogeyman du Jour ( i.e.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ days from now , the coronavirus is no longer being promoted as an existential threat to humanity , then will war and wholesale slaughter become “ humanitarian ” again ?
Of course such a pronouncement doesn ’ t bear the slightest scrutiny .
Sure , it ’ s a nice sentiment that everyone can get behind ( “ Yes , we should stop war for an arbitrarily defined period of time !
” ) but that ’ s precisely the point ; it ’ s a PR move that is designed to swirl @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” and “ world peace ” around in our head so that we all end up with warm , fuzzy feelings about the UN and come to believe that there is some sort of global governmental body that can stop war at the snap of its fingers .
As usual , there is a modicum of truth to the sentiment ; without our misleaders constantly conspiring to whip up public anger against perceived enemies and purchasing billions of dollars of military equipment , it ’ s highly doubtful that there would be very @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Do you really think the average Saudi would be motivated to help fund and equip an Air Force , and then volunteer to jump in a fighter jet and conduct bombing raids on Yemeni villages , slaughtering men , women and children they ’ ve never met and who never caused them offense , all on their own ?
Without a government ( or , in this case , a spoiled crown prince ) deciding that it is in “ the Kingdom ’ s ” interests to carry out such strikes ( and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Kingdom ’ s money to make it happen ) , would such warfare be taking place at all ?
So , yes , if the global elistists truly wanted to bring about world peace , it wouldn ’ t just be possible , it would be fairly straightforward .
They would just have to dismantle the war machine they created , renounce the warmaking powers they bestowed on themselves , and get behind the movement to criminalize war .
But of course that ’ s not what they ’ re doing .
Instead @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Security Council publicity stunt , passing a resolution calling for “ humanitarian pauses ” in our regularly scheduled warfare .
.
.
that will naturally resume in 90 days ( or less ) .
One presumes this cessation of hostilities also applies to any Palestinians thinking of defending their homeland from impending Israeli annexation .
No , this latest resolution means nothing of importance for those seeking actual world peace .
What it does do is confirm yet again that—exactly as I have had cause to point out time and again since this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ peace is the war that these same misleaders are waging against their own populations .
The signs of this warfare are everywhere apparent .
It can be seen in the European Commission ’ s “ roadmap ” for implementing a common vaccination card / passport for all EU citizens by 2022 .
It can be seen in the UN ’ s own “ Verified ” initiative , which threatens to “ counter the spread of COVID-19 misinformation by sharing fact-based advice with their communities.
” ( And I think we all know what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seen in the deliberate targeting of the elderly in care homes to artificially inflate the death rates during this crisis .
It can be seen in the mandatory vaccinations , lockdowns , closures , and all of the other laws , rules and regulations that are seeking to restrict the basic rights and freedoms in this dawning Age of Biosecurity .
In each and every case , these actions — actions that are being taken by governments of the world against their own people , mind you — are themselves threats to peace @ @ @ @ @ @ @ economic livelihood ) to the majority of humanity .
Far from delivering world peace , these misleaders are themselves waging war on the very people they claim to be ruling over .
But of course the UN Security Council is not interested in ending ( or even “ humanitarian pausing ” ) these threats to humanity .
No , the very idea that the clowns and puppets at the Security Council can deliver world peace ( or a “ humanitarian pause ” in armed conflict ) via a simple resolution ( with a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its face ; thinking that they actually desire world peace is even more absurd .
The world misleaders are not interested in actual world peace .
They do not want the peace that comes when humanity is free from the clutches of the governments that seek to track , trace , control and sanction their every movement .
That is the vision of world peace that is never presented in these cheap publicity stunts at the UN .
Now let ’ s all set the clock before this “ world ceasefire ” is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Too late .

Kumbaya and pass the bubbly! World peace has been achieved!
What, haven’t you heard? The UN Security Council just passed a resolution that calls for a global ceasefire as a type of “humanitarian pause” while the world deals with the coronavirus pandemic that (we are told) is wreaking such havoc on the human population.
Or, as the UN puts it:
The Security Council on Wednesday echoed the Secretary-General’s call for a worldwide ceasefire, to combat the coronavirus pandemic that has already claimed more than half a million lives. The UN chief welcomed the long-awaited move, calling for countries to “redouble their efforts for peace”.
This tells us three things:
Our noble leaders love us and care for us and want to protect us during this time of crisis. The pandemic must be real and it must be supremely grave, because why else would the Security Council be acting like this? We can expect the next 90 days to be a heaven on earth where the nations of the world lay down their arms and live in peace and harmony.
Right?
Well, not exactly. You see, the resolution asks member nations to cease all of their military operations except “military operations against Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL/Da’esh), Al-Qaida and Al-Nusra Front, and all other individuals, groups, undertakings and entities associated with Al-Qaida or ISIL, and other Council-designated terrorist groups.” But other than that wee little asterisk, that’s it. War is done-zo! . . . For three months, anyway.
Let’s start by examining the idea of a global 90-day ceasefire (except if you’re fighting the really bad guys). Is this supposed to signal to the rest of the world that bombing and violence and bloodshed is OK as long as it doesn’t distract people from panicking about the Official Bogeyman du Jour (i.e., coronavirus)?
If, 90 days from now, the coronavirus is no longer being promoted as an existential threat to humanity, then will war and wholesale slaughter become “humanitarian” again?
Of course such a pronouncement doesn’t bear the slightest scrutiny. Sure, it’s a nice sentiment that everyone can get behind (“Yes, we should stop war for an arbitrarily defined period of time!”) but that’s precisely the point; it’s a PR move that is designed to swirl the Security Council and “humanitarian pause” and “world peace” around in our head so that we all end up with warm, fuzzy feelings about the UN and come to believe that there is some sort of global governmental body that can stop war at the snap of its fingers.
As usual, there is a modicum of truth to the sentiment; without our misleaders constantly conspiring to whip up public anger against perceived enemies and purchasing billions of dollars of military equipment, it’s highly doubtful that there would be very much large-scale international warfare at all.
The global elistists truly wanted to bring about world peace, it wouldn’t just be possible, it would be fairly straightforward. They would just have to dismantle the war machine they created, renounce the warmaking powers they bestowed on themselves, and get behind the movement to criminalize war.
But of course that’s not what they’re doing. Instead we’re treated to a mere Security Council publicity stunt, passing a resolution calling for “humanitarian pauses” in our regularly scheduled warfare . . . that will naturally resume in 90 days (or less). One presumes this cessation of hostilities also applies to any Palestinians thinking of defending their homeland from impending Israeli annexation.
No, this latest resolution means nothing of importance for those seeking actual world peace. What it does do is confirm yet again that—exactly as I have had cause to point out time and again since this coronavirus crisis started—the REAL threat to world peace is the war that these same misleaders are waging against their own populations.
The signs of this warfare are everywhere apparent.
It can be seen in the European Commission’s “roadmap” for implementing a common vaccination card / passport for all EU citizens by 2022.
It can be seen in the UN’s own “Verified” initiative, which threatens to “counter the spread of COVID-19 misinformation by sharing fact-based advice with their communities.” (And I think we all know what that means.)
It can be seen in the deliberate targeting of the elderly in care homes to artificially inflate the death rates during this crisis.
It can be seen in the mandatory vaccinations, lockdowns, closures, and all of the other laws, rules and regulations that are seeking to restrict the basic rights and freedoms in this dawning Age of Biosecurity.
In each and every case, these actions — actions that are being taken by governments of the world against their own people, mind you — are themselves threats to peace and stability (not to mention the economic livelihood) to the majority of humanity. Far from delivering world peace, these misleaders are themselves waging war on the very people they claim to be ruling over.
But of course the UN Security Council is not interested in ending (or even “humanitarian pausing”) these threats to humanity. No, the very idea that the clowns and puppets at the Security Council can deliver world peace (or a “humanitarian pause” in armed conflict) via a simple resolution (with a 90-day expiry date) is absurd on its face; thinking that they actually desire world peace is even more absurd.
The world misleaders are not interested in actual world peace. They do not want the peace that comes when humanity is free from the clutches of the governments that seek to track, trace, control and sanction their every movement. That is the vision of world peace that is never presented in these cheap publicity stunts at the UN.
Now let’s all set the clock before this “world ceasefire” is broken . . . oh, wait. Too late.


humansarefree--2020-07-06--Infamous ‘Golden State Killer’ (Responsible for Raping 45 Women and Killed 13 Individuals) Was Final

Infamous ‘Golden State Killer’ (Responsible for Raping 45 Women and Killed 13 Individuals) Was Finally Caught And He Was A Cop

In 2018 , a decades-long search for the “ Golden State Killer ” finally came to an end after police arrested the man they believe was responsible for killing 13 individuals and raping 45 women over the course of many years — and , it turns out he was a cop .
Now , the 74-year-old former police officer is going to plead guilty to 13 murders , 13 kidnapping charges , and dozens of rapes .
Joseph James DeAngelo was a police officer in Auburn , California , who was fired after he was caught stealing dog repellent and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to carrying out the crime spree that shocked the state .
And he ’ s doing it to stay alive .
According to the Guardian , the plea deal spares DeAngelo any chance of the death penalty .
Prosecutors who had sought the death penalty cited the highly complicated case and the advancing age of many of the victims and witnesses in agreeing to consider the plea bargain .
The idea of a man attempting to save his own life by pleading guilty to taking the lives of more than a dozen innocent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ — though we should expect nothing less .
The crime spree began three years before he was fired from being a police officer in 1979 .
The search was revived in 2016 when Sgt .
Paul Belli , a detective with the Sacramento County Police Department , was assigned the decades-old mission to find the Golden State Killer , who was also accused of 150 break-ins .
“ This is a time we want to take to acknowledge this serial offender who was probably one of the most prolific , certainly in California @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but also to let the victims know that we ’ ll never give up , ” Belli said in June 2016 .
The Golden State Killer ’ s crimes usually followed a sick modus operandi where he would break into homes , tie up the husband and place dinner plates on his back and rape the wife , all the while promising to kill the couple if any plate fell and broke .
Some of his other victims were single women who lived in single-story homes .
One victim told investigators he broke @ @ @ @ @ @ @ raped and took many of her valuables .
He then returned and raped her .
Following the rapes , he would call the women to emotionally terrorize them by promising to come back and kill them .
The following YouTube video is reportedly the killer promising to come back and kill his victim : Here is another recording of a victim detailing her attack : According to a report from SFGate : “ From May 1976 to 1977 , the East Area Rapist was primarily in Rancho Cordova , Citrus Heights , Sacramento @ @ @ @ @ @ @ June and July of 1978 , attacks were reported in Davis and Modesto before moving on to the Bay Area and continuing from 1978 to 1979 .
There were reported attacks in Concord , San Ramon , Danville , Walnut Creek , San Jose , Fremont and Rancho Cordova .
In 1986 , he was last reported to have killed in Goleta and Irvine areas before disappearing entirely.
” More likely than not , DeAngelo ’ s prior military experience in the Navy , and his time as a law enforcement officer provided @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out his crimes .
Here are some photos of the alleged killer as he appeared in the Navy and as an officer : As The Free Thought Project has reported on numerous occasions , police officers are only held accountable for their actions when they are eventually caught in the act of committing a crime .
Just as with DeAngelo , criminal charges are rarely filed if at all , leading many to conclude there is a double-standard for police officers as opposed to the rest of the general public .
Had DeAngelo @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his crimes , he could have been sentenced to time in prison , which would have taken his ability to rape , terrorize , and murder countless individuals during that time .
Those charges never materialized and the criminal was allowed to walk away as a free man .
The case of the Golden State Killer should serve as proof enough that police officers not only need to be held accountable for criminal actions but to an even higher standard .
When someone puts on the badge and instantly gains the trust of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be given passes on criminal behavior .
Who knows how many people are still in prison because of one crooked cop ?
Surely DeAngelo helped put people behind bars , tarnishing their reputations whether they were guilty or not .
Defense attorneys will likely be combing through any and all court cases involving the alleged murderous rapist to see if defendants can now be set free .
The costs of jailing such individuals must surely be staggering .

In 2018, a decades-long search for the “Golden State Killer” finally came to an end after police arrested the man they believe was responsible for killing 13 individuals and raping 45 women over the course of many years — and, it turns out he was a cop.
Now, the 74-year-old former police officer is going to plead guilty to 13 murders, 13 kidnapping charges, and dozens of rapes.
Joseph James DeAngelo was a police officer in Auburn, California, who was fired after he was caught stealing dog repellent and a hammer.
He is now admitting to carrying out the crime spree that shocked the state. And he’s doing it to stay alive.
According to the Guardian, the plea deal spares DeAngelo any chance of the death penalty.
Prosecutors who had sought the death penalty cited the highly complicated case and the advancing age of many of the victims and witnesses in agreeing to consider the plea bargain.
The idea of a man attempting to save his own life by pleading guilty to taking the lives of more than a dozen innocent people speaks to his level of cowardice — though we should expect nothing less.
The crime spree began three years before he was fired from being a police officer in 1979. The search was revived in 2016 when Sgt.
Paul Belli, a detective with the Sacramento County Police Department, was assigned the decades-old mission to find the Golden State Killer, who was also accused of 150 break-ins.
“This is a time we want to take to acknowledge this serial offender who was probably one of the most prolific, certainly in California, possibly in the United States, but also to let the victims know that we’ll never give up,” Belli said in June 2016.
The Golden State Killer’s crimes usually followed a sick modus operandi where he would break into homes, tie up the husband and place dinner plates on his back and rape the wife, all the while promising to kill the couple if any plate fell and broke.
Some of his other victims were single women who lived in single-story homes. One victim told investigators he broke into her home days before she was raped and took many of her valuables.
He then returned and raped her. Following the rapes, he would call the women to emotionally terrorize them by promising to come back and kill them.
The following YouTube video is reportedly the killer promising to come back and kill his victim:
Here is another recording of a victim detailing her attack:
According to a report from SFGate:
“From May 1976 to 1977, the East Area Rapist was primarily in Rancho Cordova, Citrus Heights, Sacramento, Carmichael and Orangevale.
“In June and July of 1978, attacks were reported in Davis and Modesto before moving on to the Bay Area and continuing from 1978 to 1979. There were reported attacks in Concord, San Ramon, Danville, Walnut Creek, San Jose, Fremont and Rancho Cordova. In 1986, he was last reported to have killed in Goleta and Irvine areas before disappearing entirely.”
More likely than not, DeAngelo’s prior military experience in the Navy, and his time as a law enforcement officer provided all the cover he needed to carry out his crimes.
Here are some photos of the alleged killer as he appeared in the Navy and as an officer:
As The Free Thought Project has reported on numerous occasions, police officers are only held accountable for their actions when they are eventually caught in the act of committing a crime.
Just as with DeAngelo, criminal charges are rarely filed if at all, leading many to conclude there is a double-standard for police officers as opposed to the rest of the general public.
Had DeAngelo been charged and convicted in 1979 for his crimes, he could have been sentenced to time in prison, which would have taken his ability to rape, terrorize, and murder countless individuals during that time.
Those charges never materialized and the criminal was allowed to walk away as a free man.
The case of the Golden State Killer should serve as proof enough that police officers not only need to be held accountable for criminal actions but to an even higher standard.
When someone puts on the badge and instantly gains the trust of the American public, they should never be given passes on criminal behavior.
Who knows how many people are still in prison because of one crooked cop? Surely DeAngelo helped put people behind bars, tarnishing their reputations whether they were guilty or not.
Defense attorneys will likely be combing through any and all court cases involving the alleged murderous rapist to see if defendants can now be set free. The costs of jailing such individuals must surely be staggering.
Reference: Thefreethoughtproject.com


humansarefree--2020-07-06--Ex-Reddit CEO Ellen Pao Admits ‘We Knew’ About Ghislaine Maxwell Sex Trafficking Underage Girls

Former Reddit CEO Ellen Pao admitted in a tweet “ we knew ” about Ghislaine Maxwell sex trafficking underage girls but attended a party where Maxwell was present anyway .
“ Pao , a former partner at venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins , said Maxwell was at the firm ’ s holiday party in 2011 , more than two years after Epstein was first convicted of soliciting sex from a 14 year old , ” reports Business Insider .
“ [ Maxwell ] was at the Kleiner holiday party in 2011 , but I had no desire to meet her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ her , ” Pao tweeted last night .
“ We knew about her supplying underage girls for sex , but I guess that was fine with the ‘ cool ’ people who managed the tightly controlled guest list.
” As Mike Cernovich notes , Al Gore was also at the event where no spouses were allowed .
After Pao was asked to elaborate on her tweet , she placed her Twitter account on lockdown .
After her tweet garnered media attention , Pao tried to clarify it by noting that Maxwell had been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the abuse as early as March 2011 .
“ To be clear , the press had described her as supplying underage girls for sex , but she had not been charged so I guess it would be more accurate to say we ‘ suspected ’ v ‘ knew , ’ ” said Pao in a follow up tweet .
When another Twitter user accused Pao of appearing to be “ fine ” with it , Pao responded , “ What I said made no difference here.
” During that period , Jeffrey Epstein @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Big Tech leaders and dined with the likes of Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos and Google cofounder Sergey Brin in March 2011 .
Epstein also met with Microsoft founder Bill Gates multiple times following Epstein ’ s first conviction for sex crimes in 2008 .
Maxwell is currently in prison after being arrested by federal agents on Thursday at her secretive New Hampshire home .
According to reports , she may be willing to give up information on big names who were complicit in Epstein ’ s activities in exchange for a plea deal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do the same and was found dead less than a month later .

Former Reddit CEO Ellen Pao admitted in a tweet “we knew” about Ghislaine Maxwell sex trafficking underage girls but attended a party where Maxwell was present anyway.
“Pao, a former partner at venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins, said Maxwell was at the firm’s holiday party in 2011, more than two years after Epstein was first convicted of soliciting sex from a 14 year old,” reports Business Insider.
“[Maxwell] was at the Kleiner holiday party in 2011, but I had no desire to meet her much less have a photo taken with her,” Pao tweeted last night.
“We knew about her supplying underage girls for sex, but I guess that was fine with the ‘cool’ people who managed the tightly controlled guest list.”
As Mike Cernovich notes, Al Gore was also at the event where no spouses were allowed.
According to former Reddit Ellen Pao, “we knew” underage girls were sex trafficked by Ghislaine Maxwell in 2011 – Maxwell attended the event. – Al Gore attended. – No spouses were allowed. pic.twitter.com/qtAm46m7bE — Cernovich (@Cernovich) July 6, 2020
After Pao was asked to elaborate on her tweet, she placed her Twitter account on lockdown.
After her tweet garnered media attention, Pao tried to clarify it by noting that Maxwell had been accused by victims of taking part in the abuse as early as March 2011.
“To be clear, the press had described her as supplying underage girls for sex, but she had not been charged so I guess it would be more accurate to say we ‘suspected’ v ‘knew,’” said Pao in a follow up tweet.
When another Twitter user accused Pao of appearing to be “fine” with it, Pao responded, “What I said made no difference here.”
During that period, Jeffrey Epstein had been keen on pursuing relationships with Big Tech leaders and dined with the likes of Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos and Google cofounder Sergey Brin in March 2011.
Epstein also met with Microsoft founder Billy Boy multiple times following Epstein’s first conviction for sex crimes in 2008.
Maxwell is currently in prison after being arrested by federal agents on Thursday at her secretive New Hampshire home.
According to reports, she may be willing to give up information on big names who were complicit in Epstein’s activities in exchange for a plea deal, although Epstein was reportedly willing to do the same and was found dead less than a month later.
Source: Summit.news


humansarefree--2020-07-06--Highly Dangerous Drug Being Used to Sedate COVID Patients

In my recent series of articles , I ’ ve exposed the fact that COVID-19 equals killing old ill people — the causing of their premature deaths through terror and isolation — it ’ s not a virus — and thus falsely inflating “ epidemic ” numbers .
And now this : I ’ ve become aware of a very dangerous drug — Fresenius Propoven — that is being used to sedate COVID patients who are on breathing ventilators in US hospitals .
The FDA has approved its use on an emergency basis “ during the pandemic.
” Why ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ short supply ?
The FDA openly warns that the concentration of the active ingredient in the drug is higher than usual .
Double , in fact .
This raises MAJOR issues .
We know that in some hospitals , the level of care is casual and neglectful , to say the least .
Untrained or inattentive staff are routinely putting patients on ventilators .
Medicare is paying out coverage to hospitals at a much higher rate , when COVID-diagnosed patients are placed on ventilators .
In New York City , at least one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has gone public with the fact that some patients need oxygen , but ventilator protocols can damage their lungs and kill them .
A nurse working at Elmhurst Hospital in Queens , New York — Erin Marie Olszewski — stated that patients on ventilators are given very heavy sedation , and they never wake up .
Hospitals are , to an alarming degree , liability – free zones , because they isolate COVID patients and wall them off from friends and family .
And now : a sedative drug that contains a much @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the extreme danger of overdose .
Here are the details from an FDA page : “ The U.S. Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) has issued an Emergency Use Authorization ( EUA ) to permit the emergency use of the unapproved product , Fresenius Propoven 2 % ( propofol 20 mg/mL ) Emulsion 100 mL , to maintain sedation via continuous infusion in patients greater than 16 years old who require mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit ( ICU ) setting.
” “ CAUTION : THERE IS A RISK OF @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fresenius Propoven 2 % Emulsion contains the same active ingredient , propofol , as FDA-approved Diprivan Injectable Emulsion USP 10 mg/mL , but contains double the concentration .
BECAUSE OF THIS DIFFERENCE IN CONCENTRATION BETWEEN THIS UNAPPROVED PRODUCT AND THE FDA-APPROVED PRODUCT , THERE IS A RISK OF UNINTENTIONAL OVERDOSE.
” “ Fresenius Propoven 2 % Emulsion 100mL is not an FDA-approved drug in the United States .
However , FDA has issued an EUA permitting the emergency use of Fresenius Propoven 2 % Emulsion during the COVID-19 pandemic.
” The scope of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ * Fresenius Propoven 2 % Emulsion will be used only to maintain sedation via continuous infusion in patients greater than 16 years old who require mechanical ventilation .
* Fresenius Propoven 2 % Emulsion will be administered only by a licensed healthcare provider in an ICU setting .
* Fresenius Propoven 2 % Emulsion will NOT be administered to pregnant women , unless there are no FDA-approved products available to maintain sedation for these patients should they require mechanical ventilation in an ICU setting .
* Fresenius Propoven 2 % Emulsion will be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ regimens as detailed in the authorized Fact Sheets .
“ Fresenius Propoven 2 % Emulsion 50 mL is approved in Europe and other international countries .
The Fresenius Propoven 2 % Emulsion 100mL product will be manufactured by Fresenius Kabi AG in the same FDA inspected facilities as DIPRIVAN® and other Propoven 2 % fill sizes.
” As you can see , the FDA makes a point of warning about overdose .
But the Agency allows the use of this drug , at hospitals where the standard of care — and the lack @ @ @ @ @ @ @ patients — are HIGHLY serious problems… all in all , a recipe for disaster .
As usual , the general public is completely uninformed .
The entire focus is on “ the virus.
” Instead of on medical treatment itself as a cause of death .
The medical community is well aware of the disaster their own treatments pose .
As I ’ ve cited numerous times in these pages , a review done in the year 2000 , and published in the Journal of the American Medical Association ( 8/26/2000 ) , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Barbara Starfield , of the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health , the review was titled , “ Is US Health Really the Best in the World ?
” Starfield conservatively estimated that every year , the US medical system kills 225,000 people .
119,000 as a result of mistreatment and errors in hospitals ; and 106,000 from the effects of FDA-approved medical drugs .
When I interviewed Starfield in 2009 , she emphatically stated she was aware of NO systematic effort by the federal government to remedy this horrific ongoing catastrophe .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID-19 .

In my recent series of articles, I’ve exposed the fact that COVID-19 equals killing old ill people — the causing of their premature deaths through terror and isolation — it’s not a virus — and thus falsely inflating “epidemic” numbers.
And now this:
I’ve become aware of a very dangerous drug — Fresenius Propoven — that is being used to sedate COVID patients who are on breathing ventilators in US hospitals.
The FDA has approved its use on an emergency basis “during the pandemic.”
Why? Unclear. Because other drugs are in short supply? The FDA openly warns that the concentration of the active ingredient in the drug is higher than usual. Double, in fact.
This raises MAJOR issues. We know that in some hospitals, the level of care is casual and neglectful, to say the least.
Untrained or inattentive staff are routinely putting patients on ventilators. Medicare is paying out coverage to hospitals at a much higher rate, when COVID-diagnosed patients are placed on ventilators.
In New York City, at least one ER doctor — Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell — has gone public with the fact that some patients need oxygen, but ventilator protocols can damage their lungs and kill them.
A nurse working at Elmhurst Hospital in Queens, New York — Erin Marie Olszewski — stated that patients on ventilators are given very heavy sedation, and they never wake up.
Hospitals are, to an alarming degree, liability – free zones, because they isolate COVID patients and wall them off from friends and family.
And now: a sedative drug that contains a much higher-than-usual concentration of the active ingredient — with the extreme danger of overdose.
Here are the details from an FDA page:
“EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION (EUA) OF FRESENIUS PROPOVEN 2% EMULSION”
“The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to permit the emergency use of the unapproved product, Fresenius Propoven 2% (propofol 20 mg/mL) Emulsion 100 mL, to maintain sedation via continuous infusion in patients greater than 16 years old who require mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting.”
“CAUTION: THERE IS A RISK OF UNINTENTIONAL OVERDOSE WITH THIS UNAPPROVED PRODUCT. Fresenius Propoven 2% Emulsion contains the same active ingredient, propofol, as FDA-approved Diprivan Injectable Emulsion USP 10 mg/mL, but contains double the concentration. BECAUSE OF THIS DIFFERENCE IN CONCENTRATION BETWEEN THIS UNAPPROVED PRODUCT AND THE FDA-APPROVED PRODUCT, THERE IS A RISK OF UNINTENTIONAL OVERDOSE.”
“Fresenius Propoven 2% Emulsion 100mL is not an FDA-approved drug in the United States. However, FDA has issued an EUA permitting the emergency use of Fresenius Propoven 2% Emulsion during the COVID-19 pandemic.”
The scope of the EUA is limited as follows:
* Fresenius Propoven 2% Emulsion will be used only to maintain sedation via continuous infusion in patients greater than 16 years old who require mechanical ventilation.
* Fresenius Propoven 2% Emulsion will be administered only by a licensed healthcare provider in an ICU setting.
* Fresenius Propoven 2% Emulsion will NOT be administered to pregnant women, unless there are no FDA-approved products available to maintain sedation for these patients should they require mechanical ventilation in an ICU setting.
* Fresenius Propoven 2% Emulsion will be used only in accordance with the dosing regimens as detailed in the authorized Fact Sheets.
“Fresenius Propoven 2% Emulsion 50 mL is approved in Europe and other international countries. The Fresenius Propoven 2% Emulsion 100mL product will be manufactured by Fresenius Kabi AG in the same FDA inspected facilities as DIPRIVAN® and other Propoven 2% fill sizes.”
As you can see, the FDA makes a point of warning about overdose.
But the Agency allows the use of this drug, at hospitals where the standard of care — and the lack of access for family and friends of patients — are HIGHLY serious problems… all in all, a recipe for disaster.
As usual, the general public is completely uninformed. The entire focus is on “the virus.” Instead of on medical treatment itself as a cause of death.
The medical community is well aware of the disaster their own treatments pose. As I’ve cited numerous times in these pages, a review done in the year 2000, and published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (8/26/2000), spelled it out.
Authored by Dr. Barbara Starfield, of the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, the review was titled,
“Is US Health Really the Best in the World?” Starfield conservatively estimated that every year, the US medical system kills 225,000 people.
119,000 as a result of mistreatment and errors in hospitals; and 106,000 from the effects of FDA-approved medical drugs.
When I interviewed Starfield in 2009, she emphatically stated she was aware of NO systematic effort by the federal government to remedy this horrific ongoing catastrophe.
It’s still business as usual.
The business of medically caused death.
And now they’re calling it COVID-19.
By Jon Rappoport, Guest writer