humansarefree--2020-08-05--Alan Dershowitz On Sexual Consent: ‘Reasonable People Can Disagree Over Whether It Should Be As Low

Alan Dershowitz On Sexual Consent: ‘Reasonable People Can Disagree Over Whether It Should Be As Low As 14’

In 1997 , well known American lawyer and political commentator Alan Dershowitz published an article titled “ Statutory Rape is an Outdated Concept.
” ( You can see a screenshot of it below . )
In it , he states that “ reasonable people can disagree over whether it ( the age of consent ) should be as low as 14 , 15 would be an appropriate compromise.
” He then goes on to suggest that “ Perhaps there should be stair-casing below 15 with the penalty increasing inversely with the age of the victim.
” This means that if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 14 , and a 50 year old man slept with a 13 year old , the penalty wouldn ’ t be as severe as it would be if it were a 12 year old , and so on and so forth .
He has since defended his position .
His argument is that if girls at this age can decide whether or not they can have an abortion , then they are certainly capable of consenting to sex with older people .
Another point he makes is that puberty is happening at younger @ @ @ @ @ @ @ seems to justify his position .
For me , at that age a child is still a child , they are still developing both mentally and physically .
You could argue they are in-fact in a more vulnerable time in their life to be taken advantage of , which in my opinion is simply another form of rape , despite the fact that at the time it may appear to be “ consensual.
” This is why many of these children grow up and are adversely affected by their experience , because when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mental capacity to understand what really happened .
Someone like Jeffrey Epstein is an expert in manufacturing consent , perhaps that ’ s why there is reason to believe Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were both high ranking intelligence officers , with the job of entrapping powerful politicians and people .
Keep in mind that Epstein and other powerful people have been accused of rape , without consent , despite the fact that again , manufacturing the consent of a child is still , in my-opinion , rape and leads to large amounts of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : is this the type of world we wish to live in ?
If not , then what do we do about this reality ?
Are we addressing the underlying reasons as to why this happens ?
Are we empowering it unknowingly ?
Many people have brought Dershowitzs ’ article back into the lime-light given the fact that he had defended Jeffrey Epstein , the convicted pedophile who apparently killed himself .
The article has also been making its rounds after documents were recently unsealed a few days ago in which Bill Clinton @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The documents pertain to Ghislaine Maxwell , who is currently being held without bail .
She was Epstein ’ s right hand person , and the documents allege that Maxwell sexually abused children and also directed victim Virginia Roberts Giuffre to be sexually abused by others like Dershowitz .
These accusations also corroborate with a number of other victims that have spoken out against both Maxwell , Epstein and others , claiming that many children were groomed to be sex slaves .
The documents were part of now-settled civil litigation against Maxwell @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The emeritus Harvard Law professor was accused of having sex with then-minor “ Jane Doe # 3 ” — identified in court documents as Virginia Roberts Giuffre — and witnessing Jeffrey Epstein and others sexually abusing girls and young women .
“ The allegations , lodged in a 2014 court filing , reemerged in more than 600 pages unsealed Thursday night in Giuffre ’ s 2015 defamation case against Maxwell.
” Did Dershowitz know what Epstein was doing ?
He claims he didn ’ t , but from the public point of view @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s quite clear that nearly ‘ everyone ’ in Hollywood and big politics knows what is going on , and knew what was going on , as stated even by John McCain ’ s wife .
This begs the question , how can so many people remain silent and not speak up about and against elite level pedophilia ?
Why didn ’ t she say anything ?
Are they involved ?
Why are so many people who ‘ mingle ’ in these circles so silent ?
Dershowitz is of course responding to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is lying , and that there is no evidence at all he was ever involved in having sex with/raping a minor .
What ’ s concerning is that Giuffre ’ s accusations corroborate with many other victims that have come forward making these claims over the years .
Family Of Judge Esther Salas Assassinated After Being Assigned Jeffrey Epstein Case It ’ s strange sometimes when reading about this topic within the mainstream , or how it ’ s covered by mainstream media .
The word “ rape ” doesn ’ t seem @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are more terms used like “ underaged girls.
” We must remember that although young children have not been implicated in the Epstein case , teenagers are still developing both physically and mentally , and they are very susceptible and vulnerable to brainwashing and manipulation by people of power .
The Epstein case is a great example , and there are multiple accusers here who are all sharing the same story .
But how much of what we are getting from the mainstream pertaining to the Epstein/Maxwell case actually highlights how widespread this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suggesting that little children , not just teenagers , are also being sexually abused , trafficking , and murdered , sometimes in a ritualistic fashion .

In 1997, well known American lawyer and political commentator Alan Dershowitz published an article titled “Statutory Rape is an Outdated Concept.” (You can see a screenshot of it below.)
In it, he states that “reasonable people can disagree over whether it (the age of consent) should be as low as 14, 15 would be an appropriate compromise.”
He then goes on to suggest that “Perhaps there should be stair-casing below 15 with the penalty increasing inversely with the age of the victim.”
This means that if the age of consent was lowered to 14, and a 50 year old man slept with a 13 year old, the penalty wouldn’t be as severe as it would be if it were a 12 year old, and so on and so forth. He has since defended his position.
His argument is that if girls at this age can decide whether or not they can have an abortion, then they are certainly capable of consenting to sex with older people.
Another point he makes is that puberty is happening at younger ages these days, another reason he seems to justify his position.
For me, at that age a child is still a child, they are still developing both mentally and physically.
You could argue they are in-fact in a more vulnerable time in their life to be taken advantage of, which in my opinion is simply another form of rape, despite the fact that at the time it may appear to be “consensual.”
This is why many of these children grow up and are adversely affected by their experience, because when they are older they have a greater mental capacity to understand what really happened.
Someone like Jeffrey Epstein is an expert in manufacturing consent, perhaps that’s why there is reason to believe Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were both high ranking intelligence officers, with the job of entrapping powerful politicians and people.
Keep in mind that Epstein and other powerful people have been accused of rape, without consent, despite the fact that again, manufacturing the consent of a child is still, in my-opinion, rape and leads to large amounts of trauma.
One only has to ask: is this the type of world we wish to live in? If not, then what do we do about this reality? Are we addressing the underlying reasons as to why this happens? Are we empowering it unknowingly?
Many people have brought Dershowitzs’ article back into the lime-light given the fact that he had defended Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted pedophile who apparently killed himself.
The article has also been making its rounds after documents were recently unsealed a few days ago in which Bill Clinton, Dershowitz and others have been implicated.
The documents pertain to Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently being held without bail. She was Epstein’s right hand person, and the documents allege that Maxwell sexually abused children and also directed victim Virginia Roberts Giuffre to be sexually abused by others like Dershowitz.
These accusations also corroborate with a number of other victims that have spoken out against both Maxwell, Epstein and others, claiming that many children were groomed to be sex slaves.
The documents were part of now-settled civil litigation against Maxwell. The NY Post explains:
“The emeritus Harvard Law professor was accused of having sex with then-minor “Jane Doe #3” — identified in court documents as Virginia Roberts Giuffre — and witnessing Jeffrey Epstein and others sexually abusing girls and young women.
“The allegations, lodged in a 2014 court filing, reemerged in more than 600 pages unsealed Thursday night in Giuffre’s 2015 defamation case against Maxwell.”
Did Dershowitz know what Epstein was doing? He claims he didn’t, but from the public point of view, and in my opinion, it’s quite clear that nearly ‘everyone’ in Hollywood and big politics knows what is going on, and knew what was going on, as stated even by John McCain’s wife.
Ex-Reddit CEO Ellen Pao Admits: ‘We Knew’ About Ghislaine Maxwell Sex Trafficking Underage Girls
This begs the question, how can so many people remain silent and not speak up about and against elite level pedophilia? Why didn’t she say anything? Are they involved? Why are so many people who ‘mingle’ in these circles so silent?
Dershowitz is of course responding to the recent allegations, saying that Giuffre is lying, and that there is no evidence at all he was ever involved in having sex with/raping a minor. What’s concerning is that Giuffre’s accusations corroborate with many other victims that have come forward making these claims over the years.
Family Of Judge Esther Salas Assassinated After Being Assigned Jeffrey Epstein Case
Child-Sex Trafficking Is A Much Deeper Issue
It’s strange sometimes when reading about this topic within the mainstream, or how it’s covered by mainstream media. The word “rape” doesn’t seem to be used, and instead there are more terms used like “underaged girls.”
We must remember that although young children have not been implicated in the Epstein case, teenagers are still developing both physically and mentally, and they are very susceptible and vulnerable to brainwashing and manipulation by people of power.
The Epstein case is a great example, and there are multiple accusers here who are all sharing the same story. But how much of what we are getting from the mainstream pertaining to the Epstein/Maxwell case actually highlights how widespread this issue really is?
There is evidence suggesting that little children, not just teenagers, are also being sexually abused, trafficking, and murdered, sometimes in a ritualistic fashion.


humansarefree--2020-08-05--Alan Dershowitz Implicated In Unsealed Ghislaine Maxwell Documents

Well known attorney and political commentator Alan Dershowitz has been implicated in the latest news pertaining to the Ghislaine Maxwell case .
She is currently being held in New York awaiting her trial next year .
Dershowitz was mentioned , along with Bill Clinton and others in a set of unsealed documents that were part of now-settled civil litigation against Maxwell .
She appealed the decision of the judge to unseal them , but to no avail .
Maxwell was Epstein ’ s right hand person , and the documents , along with testimony from many others over the past @ @ @ @ @ @ @ abused children and also directed victim Virginia Roberts Giuffre to be sexually abused by others , using her and many others as sex slaves .
The emeritus Harvard Law professor was accused of having sex with then-minor “ Jane Doe # 3 ” — identified in court documents as Virginia Roberts Giuffre — and witnessing Jeffrey Epstein and others sexually abusing girls and young women .
The allegations , lodged in a 2014 court filing , reemerged in more than 600 pages unsealed Thursday night in Giuffre ’ s 2015 defamation case against @ @ @ @ @ @ @ following : “ Reasonable People Can Disagree Over Whether It Should Be As Low As 14.
” You can find that article and read more about that here .
He is currently denying the allegations made by Giuffre , calling her a liar .
He also stands by that article he wrote in 1997 .
Why This Is Important : Elite level trafficking and pedophilia are coming to light , and it ’ s a major step for humanity given that many implicated and accused people are those in positions of great power @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be idolized by the general public , usually showered with fame and fortune .
Research indicates there are many children suffering and that do suffer as a result of this activity , and there are so many examples going beyond the Jeffrey Epstein showing that this is quite rampant among our political and financial elite , and among those who pull the strings that we never really see .
This type of activity also shines light onto the world of politics .
For example , with regards to Epstein and Maxwell , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ actually high ranking intelligence officers , with the job of entrapping powerful politicians and people .
You can read more about that here .
Is this what goes on in the system we continue to hold up and empower by voting year after year ?
Why are we playing with a system that ’ s clearly created out of disconnection and separation , and that does not allow humanity to thrive ?
Is it time for something new ?
Is the current state of our world a reflection of the ‘ leadership ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ power ?

Well known attorney and political commentator Alan Dershowitz has been implicated in the latest news pertaining to the Ghislaine Maxwell case. She is currently being held in New York awaiting her trial next year.
Dershowitz was mentioned, along with Bill Clinton and others in a set of unsealed documents that were part of now-settled civil litigation against Maxwell. She appealed the decision of the judge to unseal them, but to no avail.
Maxwell was Epstein’s right hand person, and the documents, along with testimony from many others over the past few years, show that Maxwell sexually abused children and also directed victim Virginia Roberts Giuffre to be sexually abused by others, using her and many others as sex slaves.
The NY Post explains:
The emeritus Harvard Law professor was accused of having sex with then-minor “Jane Doe #3” — identified in court documents as Virginia Roberts Giuffre — and witnessing Jeffrey Epstein and others sexually abusing girls and young women.
The allegations, lodged in a 2014 court filing, reemerged in more than 600 pages unsealed Thursday night in Giuffre’s 2015 defamation case against.
In 1997, Dershowitz wrote the following: “Reasonable People Can Disagree Over Whether It Should Be As Low As 14.” You can find that article and read more about that here.
He is currently denying the allegations made by Giuffre, calling her a liar. He also stands by that article he wrote in 1997.
Why This Is Important: Elite level trafficking and pedophilia are coming to light, and it’s a major step for humanity given that many implicated and accused people are those in positions of great power, and in some cases made out to be idolized by the general public, usually showered with fame and fortune.
Research indicates there are many children suffering and that do suffer as a result of this activity, and there are so many examples going beyond the Jeffrey Epstein showing that this is quite rampant among our political and financial elite, and among those who pull the strings that we never really see.
This type of activity also shines light onto the world of politics.
For example, with regards to Epstein and Maxwell, there is evidence suggesting that both are actually high ranking intelligence officers, with the job of entrapping powerful politicians and people. You can read more about that here.
Is this what goes on in the system we continue to hold up and empower by voting year after year? Why are we playing with a system that’s clearly created out of disconnection and separation, and that does not allow humanity to thrive? Is it time for something new? Is the current state of our world a reflection of the ‘leadership’ we choose and agree to put into power?
By Arjun Walia (excerpt)


humansarefree--2020-08-05--Virginia Officials Demand Students Get Vaccinations to Participate in ONLINE Learning from Home

Public health officials in Virginia are warning prospective students to get all the required vaccinations before the start of the school year in order to do online virtual learning from their home .
If parents do not comply and do not show proof their kid got the injections , then their kid won ’ t be able to access the online learning materials provided by the school district .
This is a threat .
It ’ s also a lie , an empty threat , because children belong to their parents , not the state .
“ I think people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ going to the brick and mortar school then you don ’ t need to have the immunizations but that ’ s incorrect , ” said Fairfax County Health Department worker Shauna Severo , speaking with NBC 4 in Washington .
This controlling public health official is lying .
There are legal exemptions for any and all vaccination for schoolchildren in Virginia .
These exemptions are constantly under assault in each state , but they do exist , as long as parents realize how important their freedom is to make medical choices for their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 12VAC5-110-80 : No certificate of immunization shall be required of any student for admission to school if : The student or his parent or guardian submits a notarized Certificate of Religious Exemption ( Form CRE 1 ) , to the admitting official of the school to which the student is seeking admission .
Form CRE 1 is an affidavit stating that the administration of immunizing agents conflicts with the student ’ s religious tenets or practices .
It ’ s all about compliance as controllers try to force vaccinations on kids learning from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccination coverage is all about compliance , not health .
Why do officials want to force children to take liability-free inoculations , when these children will be learning from the confines of their home ?
How intrusive will these controlling people get ?
There ’ s nothing in the vaccinations that enhances a child ’ s immune system – no antiviral prophylactics , no minerals like zinc that will stop viral replication .
Vaccines do not contain vitamin C , so they can not boost thymus gland function nor strengthen the adaptive immune @ @ @ @ @ @ @ D and therefore do not strengthen the intra-cellular T-cell response to viral infection .
There ’ s nothing in a vaccine that strengthens the child ’ s microbiome , enhancing their immune system ’ s ability to detect and react quickly to invading pathogens .
If anything , there are enough side effects listed on the vaccine insert sheets to make any rational parent second guess the safety and effectiveness of the inoculations .
Forced to do online learning , students across the nation are being conditioned to fear their own immune system @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and adapts to its environment .
Instead , they are taught that they are biological sources of contamination , always infecting others with infections they don ’ t even have .
Forced to stay in their homes , children are being mentally abused to accept a life of fear and false guilt .
When they are included in school activities , they are lined up and spaced out like prisoners , forcibly masked and monitored .
Desperate , Virginia setting up pop up clinics to get kids vaccinated Virginia is now setting up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ schoolchildren are inoculated with the CDC ’ s bloated vaccine schedule , which has not been studied as a whole for safety .
Parents are told to make appointments beforehand .
Virginia officials are desperate to force compliance because vaccination rates have plummeted in 2020 .
During the initial lock downs , vaccination coverage plummeted as parents avoided contact with medical facilities .
Ironically , the mortality rate for infants plummeted during this time as well .
The drop off in inoculations for infants coincided with historically low cases of SIDS .
Parents @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccination rates are down .
Many are starting to see the rampant coercion in the vaccine industry and how vaccine makers are shielded from legal liability when their products harm people .
More parents are skeptical of how many vaccinations they submit their child to and are speaking up at pediatrician offices .
In the end , the threats from public health officials in Virginia are empty and have no legal or constitutional authority .
Parents have the final say what goes into their child ’ s body , especially when they are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ home .

The service NewsGuard, an establishment attempt to silence alternative media and independent media sites, has teamed up with Microsoft to help its effort to destroy free press.
NewsGuard is now automatically included in Microsoft’s Edge browser on iOS, Android and Microsoft phones.
Microsoft’s press release regarding the partnership states that NewsGuard “will empower voters by providing them with high-quality information about the integrity and transparency of online news sites.”
Just one problem, who is providing transparency about the news rating agency?
When a user decides to search the Web, the extension tells the user whether or not a story is credible or not credible with 5 indicators and an information box judging the website.
Green icon — Sites that follow “basic standards of accuracy and accountability” based on nine criteria,which include full disclosure of possible conflicts of interest, financing, and “notable ideological or political positions held by those with significant financial interests in the site.”
Red icon — Sites that do not fulfill NewsGuard’s criteria for credibility and transparency.
Orange icon — Satire and humor sites that mimic real news.
Blue icon — Sites that primarily host user-generated content.
Gray icon —Unrated sites.
There is just one problem: the plugin is only blacklisting certain sites and does not actually have fact checkers looking into the story in question.
So, in fact, the service is censoring alternative and independent media. But, let’s be honest, that’s exactly what its founders, creators, funders, and advisors want.
About that transparency … the list of advisors for NewsGuard includes Tom Ridge, the former secretary of Homeland Security, Richard Stengel, former editor of Time magazine and Undersecretary of State for Public Diplomacy (Obama administration), (Ret.) General Michael Hayden, former Director of the CIA, former Director of the National Security Agency and former Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence (George W. Bush administration), Don Baer, chairman of Burson, Cohn & Wolfe and former White House Communications Director (Clinton administration), Elise Jordan, political analyst, NBC, and former speechwriter for Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.
Oh and then there are the journalists (traitors of free speech) like John Battelle, co-founding editor of Wired and founding chief executive of Industry Standard and Jessica Lessin, founder, and editor-in-chief of The Information.
If you aren’t worried about a company with a former CIA director (who lied under oath to Congress misleading officials, according to the Senate report on the CIA’s interrogation program) and a former secretary of Homeland Security official as its advisors, you may need a reality check. Please go see Dr. Benn Swann for a checkup stat!
Then there is Richard Stengel, a member of the Atlantic Council (neo-liberal think tank) and former Undersecretary of State for Public Diplomacy under President Barack Obama who deserves a short blurb for his own involvement. Why?
Because Stengel admitted his role in life at a previous discussion hosted last May by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
At the event Stengel described his past position at the State Department as a “chief propagandist” and further stated that he is “not against propaganda” and it was needed. H/T Disobedient Media.
“Every country does it and they have to do it to their own population and I don’t necessarily think it’s that awful,” Stengel said.
At a Council on Foreign Relations forum about “fake news,” former Editor at Time Magazine Richard Stengel directly states that he supports the use of propaganda on American citizens – then shuts the session down when challenged about how propaganda is used against the third world pic.twitter.com/ClAT5POv7G — William Craddick (@williamcraddick) May 11, 2018
Investors in NewsGuard — which raised a whopping $6M in funding — include the following people and corporations, according to Finsmes, a website for real-time VC and private equities and news.
However, Finsmes appear to have left out a big investing group known as the Publicis Groupe. Publicis Groupe is the third largest global communications company in the world, with more than 80,000 employees in over 100 countries and an annual revenue of over €9.6 billion ($10.98 billion), according to its website.
– Steven Brill
– Gordon Crovitz
– Nicholas Penniman IV and Nicholas Penniman V
– Eijk van Otterloo
– Jules Kroll
– Cox Investment Holdings, Inc.
– John S. & James L. Knight Foundation, Inc.
– Blue Haven Initiative
– Eugene Garrett Bewkes III
– John McCarter
– Fitz Gate Ventures, L.P.
– Leslie Hill
– Charlotte Hill
– Thomas Glocer
– Michael Hill
– John Levy
– Whitney Hatch
Meanwhile, the current CEOs of NewsGuard are Steven Brill and Louis Gordon Crovitz, one of whom has a colorful history; the other is just a journalist.
Crovitz is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and he further notes in his bio, available on NewsGuard’s website, that he has been an “editor or contributor to books published by the American Enterprise Institute and Heritage Foundation.”
Yes, the infamous Heritage Foundation, and the American Enterprise Institute, a neoconservative think tank.
But it doesn’t end there! In the early 1980s, Crovitz held a number of positions at Dow Jones and at The Wall Street Journal, eventually becoming executive vice president of Dow Jones and the publisher of The Wall Street Journal in 2006-2007.
Ironically, Crovitz “Mr. I want to fix fake news” has consistently been accused of spreading misinformation into his Wall Street Journal columns, with groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation accusing him of “repeatedly getting his facts wrong” on NSA surveillance.
And hilariously he falsely claimed that the Internet was invented entirely privately at Xerox PARC, which was exposed as “fantastically false claims” by the same people he cited for them.
TechDirt wrote at the time:
“Almost everyone he [Crovitz] sourced or credited to support his argument that the internet was invented entirely privately at Xerox PARC and when Vint Cerf helped create TCP/IP, has spoken out to say he’s wrong. And that list includes both Vint Cerf, himself, and Xerox. Other sources, including Robert Taylor (who was there when the internet was invented) and Michael Hiltzik, have rejected Crovitz’s spinning of their own stories.”
According to NewsGuard, the service has rated more than 2,000 news and information sites, while it plans to take its ranking efforts much further by eventually reviewing “the 7,500 most-read news and information websites in the U.S.; also noting that the number accounts for “about 98 percent news and information people read and share online” in the United States in English.
The company is lobbying to have its rankings of news sites installed by default on computers in U.S. public libraries, schools, and universities as well as on smartphones and computers sold in the United States. And its partnership with Microsoft for its Edge browser just helped that effort rigorously.
Several articles represent NewsGuard as using “old-school journalism” to fight “fake news” through its reliance on nine criteria to determine whether a news site is credible or not.
However, as Breitbart pointed out (like them or not the information is credible), the news check extension is marking verifiable FAKE news stories as real news, a worrying prospect. Of course, it’s worth noting that NewsGuard is probably (speculatory) in partnership with select news publications like The New York Times, LA Times, CNN, Washington Post, etc. (All the usual big players.)
Look at how NewsGuard and Microsoft openly and audaciously deceive their readers…
The Washington Post’s debunked hoax about Russia hacking Vermont’s utility grid — credible!!
The lie about first lady Melania Trump being an illegal alien — credible!!
The lie about Trump changing the name of Black History Month — credible!!
The lie about Trump threatening to invade Mexico — credible!!
The lie about Congress investigating a Russian fund with ties to Trump — credible!!
Then there is the lack of mention by NewsGuard about the Washington Post’s founder Jeff Bezos $600 million conflicts of interest with the CIA and Voice of America, the U.S. state-funded media outlet having been involved in propaganda admitted by its acting associate director, Ted Lipien, who said that the outlet produces “fluff journalism.”
Arkansas Senator J. William Fulbright has previously stated that VOA, Radio Free Europe, and many others “should be given the opportunity to take their rightful place in the graveyard of Cold War relics.”
Fulbright’s amendment to Smith-Mundt was bolstered in 1985 by Nebraska Senator Edward Zorinsky, who argued that such “propaganda” should be kept out of America as to distinguish the U.S. “from the Soviet Union where domestic propaganda is a principal government activity.”
These are obvious red flags for anyone looking for a truly unbiased fact-checking service when such things are hidden and not publicly displayed … that, or they just suck at researching, which would essentially mean they aren’t qualified to determine what is real and fake news.
Digging even deeper into NewsGuard we may find answers as to why they are not fact checking every news story and just giving websites themselves a rating, because the company only has 21-30 employees according to Pitchbook.
If that’s not enough, Publicis Groupe includes a vast number of P.R. firms whose sole purpose is to shape the news and influence the public on behalf of its corporate clients including the drug and tobacco industries. One of those firms connected to Publicis Groupe is Qorvis Group.
“Recently filed disclosures show that Targeted Victory, a consulting firm founded by Zac Moffatt, a GOP strategist who served as digital director for Mitt Romney’s campaign, has helped to manage Arabia Now. Moffatt’s firm was brought on by Qorvis.”
For more information on NewsGuard, see the more in-depth NewsGuard backstory on MintPress News, about the firm’s connections to Silicon Valley Giants and the government.
This, of course, follows attempts by another service, PropOrNot, to do much of the same, who I ruined when I was working at We Are Change exposing them to the core. So much so they responded to my now-suspended Twitter account An0nkn0wledge. H/T guys!
As a reminder, on the last attempt PropOrNot was found to be backed by none other than the Foreign Policy Research Institute. And what is the Foreign Policy Research Institute?
A think tank with the mission of indoctrinating the U.S. with its foreign policy agenda:
“The Foreign Policy Research Institute is dedicated to bringing the insights of scholarship to bear on the foreign policy and national security challenges facing the United States. It seeks to educate the public, teach teachers, train students, and offer ideas to advance U.S. national interests based on a nonpartisan, geopolitical perspective that illuminates contemporary international affairs through the lens of history, geography, and culture.”
So here we have two attempts to censor information, both appearing to come from think tanks and several government officials as advisors on “NewsGuard.” Which, if we’re being honest should have a name change to “Propaganda Guard” because they are guarding propaganda by telling everyone it’s real news, like the examples stated above.
You can’t judge sites with a rating of green, orange, blue, gray and red. This isn’t a terror advisory, Tom Ridge (I can only guess the idea came from Ridge). When Ridge was the former secretary of Homeland Security under George Bush, he came up with the coded terror alert system after 9/11.
The system is elementary at best and doesn’t really require any type of thinking to come up with, so who knows who came up with it. But it’s extremely flawed.
Knowing that both “Propaganda Guard” (NewsGuard) and PropOrNot had government involvement should scare the shit out of you because both companies are about as unbiased as The Washington Post was towards Hillary Clinton during the 2016 election.
Both have a stake in the future foreign policy of America; NewsGuard through its former government advisors, and PropOrNot through the more hilariously connected Foreign Policy Research Institute.
Neither company has a right to shape the opinions of Americans or anyone else by giving news websites like Activist Post and many others any type of rating.
That’s up to the readers themselves to decide, not a shadowy firm with “trained analysts” who are creating a censorship blacklist of information or opinions they don’t like… you know, like the ones that hinder corporations or the military industrial complex’s forever war machine.
In fact, it will be interesting to see where this goes if this plugin is adopted by the mainstream as a default into applications. I foresee class action cease and desist lawsuits against “NewsGuard” for intentionally causing harm to businesses with just a checkmark.
This is already pretty well proven with a recent Gallup study that stated 63 percent of news readers were less likely to share a website with a red rating, while a green rating increased the likelihood of sharing by 56 percent.
Although the study was funded by NewsGuard themselves, so the results should be taken with a grain of salt. That study actually could be used to bite them in the ass later.
Did anyone think this through before saying, “oh yeah I want to help destroy the livelihoods of other people?”
My well-thought-out trained analytical expert guess is, “no they probably did not.”
Oh wait, further research into NewsGuard and its other products shows they have a BrandGuard, which they market to advertisers as a “brand safety tool aimed at helping advertisers keep their brands off of unreliable news and information sites while giving them the assurance they need to support thousands of Green-rated [NewsGuard-approved] news and information sites, big and small.”
All of this has an interesting timing, right before the 2020 primaries. Who’s to say that this technology couldn’t be used to sway the election far more than Russia, the UK or Israel ever could?
Especially since the firm is seeking to have its tech implanted by default into every major technical device.
We don’t need arbiters of truth; what we need are smarter readers who research and dig deeper themselves, instead of blindly believing what they are told or hand fed.
With all that stated, it’s worth mentioning that 90% of U.S. media was owned by 6 different companies in 2012 including GE, NewsCorp, Disney, Viacom, TimeWarner, CBS. Which, as a fun fact, the CFR owns the media.
As former Army Major Todd Pierce described, the CFR acts as “primary provocateurs” using “’psychological suggestiveness’ to create a false narrative of danger from some foreign entity with the objective being to create paranoia within the U.S. population that it is under imminent threat of attack or takeover.”
Council on Foreign Relations links to major media holdings Full graphic here: https://t.co/lyMPz4ME2Z pic.twitter.com/mmTNdQa1F9 — Defend Assange Campaign (@DefendAssange) January 28, 2018
So with all that in mind, one finds it hard to believe that a CFR member and government cronies — some even connected to think tanks — want to “restore trust and accountability” in journalism.
This is far from the only effort to try and suppress the free flow of information online. In 2017 Activist Post reported that Full Fact foundation, backed by eBay founder Pierre Omidyar and our favorite billionaire tycoon George Soros, were also planning to fight the efforts of “fake news” with their AI-powered “bull shit detector.”
Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales was also planning to launch a crowd-funded news service called WikiTribune to help combat fake news.
Send your mail to NewsGuard’s Twitter feed and Facebook page, and flood them with your opinion about their efforts. If they ask who sent you, say George Orwell from his grave and make sure to tell them they aren’t the Ministry Of Truth, this isn’t 1984.
Putting the future of what we believe in anyone’s hands, let alone artificial intelligence, seems reckless; but a system backed by Soros and Omidyar or think tanks and government officials seems like a dangerously stupid idea that can only lead to a path paved toward a road of Orwellian censorship the likes of which even George Orwell couldn’t have imagined.
Reference: ActivistPost.com


humansarefree--2020-08-06--More Doctors Speak Out on Censorship and Mass Murderer Anthony Fauci

As mass murder Dr. Anthony Fauci continues to appear in the corporate media to attack the use of hydroxychloroquine ( HCQ ) , which thousands of doctors have now said can completely cure COVID , more doctors are coming forward to expose his lies .
Fauci publicly attacked a recent positive study about HCQ published by the Henry Ford Health System , prompting two of the leading doctors of the study , doctors Adnan Munkarah and Steven Kalkanis , to publish an “ Open Letter ” refuting the lies of the mass murderer , Anthony Fauci .
Dr. Munkarah works @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Henry Ford Health System , and Dr. Kalkanis works as the chief academic officer .
Here is an excerpt : We want to point out that scientific debate is a common occurrence with almost every published study .
In part , this is what fuels the advancement of knowledge – challenging one another on our assumptions , conclusions and applications to get to a better place for the patients we collectively serve .
You can read the original study here and the senior author ’ s letter to the editor here .
Unfortunately @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has made any objective discussion about this drug impossible , and we are deeply saddened by this turn of events .
Our goal as scientists has solely been to report validated findings and allow the science to speak for itself , regardless of political considerations .
To that end , we have made the heartfelt decision to have no further comment about this outside the medical community – staying focused on our core mission in the interest of our patients , our community , and our commitment to clinical and academic integrity .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ s main complaint about their study is that it was not a “ double-blind , randomized clinical trial , ” which is considered the “ Gold Standard.
” This is an interesting criticism , since almost all of the current new medical products being fast-tracked by the FDA to treat COVID , are also not “ double-blind , randomized clinical trials.
” This is especially true for the COVID vaccine drug trials , which do not even use a true placebo , but instead usually use another vaccine known for serious side effects @ @ @ @ @ @ @ appear to be more safe .
Another doctor who has come forward to criticize Fauci is Peter R. Breggin , MD , who published an article yesterday ( August 3 , 2020 ) titled : Why COVID-19 Clinical Trials Can not Be Trusted : The “ Gold Standard ” for Science Is Gold for the Drug Companies .
Science !
We have been told that science must be relied upon to make our decisions when dealing with the pandemic called COVID-19 .
We must in effect bow down to science , no matter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
But science has an Achilles heel — a fatal flaw that can completely ruin it and frequently does .
What is the fatal flaw of science ?
It is conducted by human beings .
Science is only as dependable as the people who conduct and disseminate it .
The adage for judging opinions still holds true — consider the source !
When Anthony Fauci announced the rollout of his initial clinical trial for remdesivir as the great hope for knocking out the coronavirus epidemic , he boasted about the clinical trial ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ placebo-controlled trial is the gold standard for determining if an experimental treatment can benefit patients.
” Since controlled clinical trials involving drugs and vaccines are very expensive , require access to sick and often highly infectious patients , and must be approved by the Institutional Review Boards ( IRBs ) and the FDA — they can only be conducted with funding from Big Pharma and Big Government or occasional other large institutions .
We will see that the tragic result of this hegemony was remarkably demonstrated in Fauci ’ s government trial on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Gilead .
Meanwhile , the People ’ s Drug Is Running Ahead As we have documented in earlier reports , here and here and on our Coronavirus Resource Center , hydroxychloroquine and zinc as a prophylactic , and hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin and zinc for patients developing COVID-19 could right now greatly improve the treatment of patients in the US , as it has done elsewhere .
Doctors and entire nations have been and are continuing to use this drug successfully , especially in combination with azithromycin and zinc .
The Association of American @ @ @ @ @ @ @ countries which actively use hydroxychloroquine have significantly lower death rates than those that do not .
( Full article ) Another doctor who has spoken out in an article published today ( August 4 , 2020 ) is French Dr. Pascal Sacré .
The title of his article is : COVID-19 : We have a Treatment : Hydroxychloroquine ( HCQ ) .
We do Not Need a Vaccine !
We have a treatment in COVID-19 and it doesn ’ t have the support of Big Pharma and their experts !
It is effective @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , provided it is given early enough and provided it is given in accordance with “ contraindications ” and safety of use ( cardiac ) .
It costs nothing and the powerful pharmaceutical industry does not want to hear about it .
Big Parma has done everything to outlaw and demonize it , including the publication in the most prestigious medical journal ( Lancet ) of a fraudulent article withdrawn 12 days later .
Let ’ s stop saying that there is no treatment for COVID-19 or that only a vaccine will save @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this disease , not in intensive care , where it is too late , but to prevent it from going to intensive care , so to be given early enough , by general practitioners or emergency doctors .
The key to defeat COVID-19 already exists .
We need to start using it .
( Full Article ) Texas doctors Dr. Kevin R. Wheelan , chief of cardiology at Baylor Heart and Vascular Hospital in Dallas and Dr. Peter McCullough , a clinical cardiologist and professor at the Texas A & M School of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and sent a letter to the FDA a few days ago .
The number of doctors publicly supporting the use of hydroxychloroquine for early treatment or prevention is growing .
Recently , Dr. Kevin R. Wheelan , chief of cardiology at Baylor Heart and Vascular Hospital in Dallas and Dr. Peter McCullough , a clinical cardiologist and professor at the Texas A & M School of Medicine , issued a letter supporting the emergency use authorization ( EUA ) of hydroxychloroquine for outpatient treatment and prophylaxis for COVID-19 .
The letter dated July @ @ @ @ @ @ @ petition by several other doctors asking the Federal Drug Administration ( FDA ) to reissue an emergency use authorization for hydroxychloroquine that has been donated to the national stockpile .
Wheelan and McCullough say in their letter that “ when started earlier in the hospital course… and in outpatients , antimalarials [ hydroxychloroquine ] may reduce the progression of disease , prevent hospitalizations , and are associated with reduced mortality.
” They cite several studies for support .
In response to concerns that have been raised about cardiac issues with patients using hydroxychloroquine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with heightened scrutiny of the use of hydroxychloroquine , no monitoring boards have declared safety concerns with the 65-year-old drug .
They urge the FDA to allow physicians to assess the risk to their patients in determining whether hydroxychloroquine is an appropriate treatment .
( Full article ) This is just a sampling of the doctors who are coming forward and speaking out , but don ’ t expect the national corporate media to give them any coverage , and don ’ t expect to find out anything about these doctors if you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the rest of Big Tech are accomplices to mass murder along with the big corporate media outlets , such as CNN , NBC , ABC , MSNBC , and also Fox News .
See : Google Search is the Greatest Mind Control Brainwashing Tool in the History of Mankind .
Laura Ingram and Tucker Carlson on Fox will at times give exposure to these doctors , but they will also probably politicize it and use it to attack Democrats and Joe Biden , even though this is clearly a non-partisan issue .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the news seems to be getting out , and as we reported yesterday , hundreds of thousands of people took to the streets to protest in Europe over the weekend .
See : Hydroxychloroquine Scandal Spurs Hundreds of Thousands to Protest in Europe , While Americans Mostly Just Comply .
Because English is now the common language among the educated around the world , hundreds of thousands of readers from India and Africa have also been coming to Health Impact News to learn the truth about HCQ during the past few days .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ up in time to free themselves of this medical tyranny , or just mostly continue to willingly comply with their own destruction ?
Here is today ’ s broadcast from Dr. Ron Paul ( also a medical doctor ) and his Liberty Report titled : Waking Up ?
More Americans Skeptical Of Media ’ s Covid Narrative This is a political thing ( mandating face masks ) , this is not a medical argument .
And people who think this is a medical argument alone , they ’ re completely wrong .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was orchestrated .
I think Black Lives Matter , Coronavirus , and the Federal Reserve have combined to bring us one of the most disastrous challenges to our economy and the world economy in the history of the world .
And its just beginning , and that ’ s threatening , and that ’ s why I am warning people to wake up !

As mass murder Dr. Anthony Fauci continues to appear in the corporate media to attack the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), which thousands of doctors have now said can completely cure COVID, more doctors are coming forward to expose his lies.
by Brian Shilhavy
Fauci publicly attacked a recent positive study about HCQ published by the Henry Ford Health System, prompting two of the leading doctors of the study, doctors Adnan Munkarah and Steven Kalkanis, to publish an “Open Letter” refuting the lies of the mass murderer, Anthony Fauci.
Dr. Munkarah works as the chief clinical officer of the Henry Ford Health System, and Dr. Kalkanis works as the chief academic officer. Here is an excerpt:
We want to point out that scientific debate is a common occurrence with almost every published study.
In part, this is what fuels the advancement of knowledge – challenging one another on our assumptions, conclusions and applications to get to a better place for the patients we collectively serve. You can read the original study here and the senior author’s letter to the editor here.
Unfortunately, the political climate that has persisted has made any objective discussion about this drug impossible, and we are deeply saddened by this turn of events.
Our goal as scientists has solely been to report validated findings and allow the science to speak for itself, regardless of political considerations.
To that end, we have made the heartfelt decision to have no further comment about this outside the medical community – staying focused on our core mission in the interest of our patients, our community, and our commitment to clinical and academic integrity. (Full letter here)
Fauci’s main complaint about their study is that it was not a “double-blind, randomized clinical trial,” which is considered the “Gold Standard.”
This is an interesting criticism, since almost all of the current new medical products being fast-tracked by the FDA to treat COVID, are also not “double-blind, randomized clinical trials.”
This is especially true for the COVID jjab drug trials, which do not even use a true placebo, but instead usually use another jjab known for serious side effects, to make the new COVID jjab appear to be more safe.
Peter R. Breggin, MD
Another doctor who has come forward to criticize Fauci is Peter R. Breggin, MD, who published an article yesterday (August 3, 2020) titled: Why COVID-19 Clinical Trials Cannot Be Trusted: The “Gold Standard” for Science Is Gold for the Drug Companies.
Excerpts:
Science! We have been told that science must be relied upon to make our decisions when dealing with the pandemic called COVID-19. We must in effect bow down to science, no matter how humiliating and painful it may feel.
But science has an Achilles heel — a fatal flaw that can completely ruin it and frequently does.
What is the fatal flaw of science? It is conducted by human beings. Science is only as dependable as the people who conduct and disseminate it. The adage for judging opinions still holds true — consider the source!
When Anthony Fauci announced the rollout of his initial clinical trial for remdesivir as the great hope for knocking out the coronavirus epidemic, he boasted about the clinical trial’s importance:
“A randomized, placebo-controlled trial is the gold standard for determining if an experimental treatment can benefit patients.”
Since controlled clinical trials involving drugs and jjabs are very expensive, require access to sick and often highly infectious patients, and must be approved by the Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and the FDA — they can only be conducted with funding from Big Pharma and Big Government or occasional other large institutions.
We will see that the tragic result of this hegemony was remarkably demonstrated in Fauci’s government trial on behalf of his favorite drug company, Gilead.
Meanwhile, the People’s Drug Is Running Ahead
As we have documented in earlier reports, here and here and on our Coronavirus Resource Center, hydroxychloroquine and zinc as a prophylactic, and hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin and zinc for patients developing COVID-19 could right now greatly improve the treatment of patients in the US, as it has done elsewhere.
Doctors and entire nations have been and are continuing to use this drug successfully, especially in combination with azithromycin and zinc.
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons has shown that the countries which actively use hydroxychloroquine have significantly lower death rates than those that do not. (Full article)
Dr. Pascal Sacré
Another doctor who has spoken out in an article published today (August 4, 2020) is French Dr. Pascal Sacré. The title of his article is: COVID-19: We have a Treatment: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). We do Not Need a Vaccine!
Some excerpts:
We have a treatment in COVID-19 and it doesn’t have the support of Big Pharma and their experts!
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is effective in treating COVID-19.
It is effective in halting the progression of the disease, provided it is given early enough and provided it is given in accordance with “contraindications” and safety of use (cardiac).
It costs nothing and the powerful pharmaceutical industry does not want to hear about it.
Big Parma has done everything to outlaw and demonize it, including the publication in the most prestigious medical journal (Lancet) of a fraudulent article withdrawn 12 days later.
Let’s stop saying that there is no treatment for COVID-19 or that only a jjab will save us!
There is a treatment for this disease, not in intensive care, where it is too late, but to prevent it from going to intensive care, so to be given early enough, by general practitioners or emergency doctors.
The key to defeat COVID-19 already exists. We need to start using it. (Full Article)
Dr. Kevin R. Wheelan and Dr. Peter McCullough
Texas doctors Dr. Kevin R. Wheelan, chief of cardiology at Baylor Heart and Vascular Hospital in Dallas and Dr. Peter McCullough, a clinical cardiologist and professor at the Texas A&M School of Medicine, have also made public comments and sent a letter to the FDA a few days ago.
Reported in The Texan:
The number of doctors publicly supporting the use of hydroxychloroquine for early treatment or prevention is growing.
Recently, Dr. Kevin R. Wheelan, chief of cardiology at Baylor Heart and Vascular Hospital in Dallas and Dr. Peter McCullough, a clinical cardiologist and professor at the Texas A&M School of Medicine, issued a letter supporting the emergency use authorization (EUA) of hydroxychloroquine for outpatient treatment and prophylaxis for COVID-19.
The letter dated July 6 was submitted in support of a petition by several other doctors asking the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) to reissue an emergency use authorization for hydroxychloroquine that has been donated to the national stockpile.
Wheelan and McCullough say in their letter that “when started earlier in the hospital course… and in outpatients, antimalarials [hydroxychloroquine] may reduce the progression of disease, prevent hospitalizations, and are associated with reduced mortality.” They cite several studies for support.
In response to concerns that have been raised about cardiac issues with patients using hydroxychloroquine, the doctors point out that even with heightened scrutiny of the use of hydroxychloroquine, no monitoring boards have declared safety concerns with the 65-year-old drug.
They urge the FDA to allow physicians to assess the risk to their patients in determining whether hydroxychloroquine is an appropriate treatment. (Full article)
This is just a sampling of the doctors who are coming forward and speaking out, but don’t expect the national corporate media to give them any coverage, and don’t expect to find out anything about these doctors if you do a Google Search, as Google and the rest of Big Tech are accomplices to mass murder along with the big corporate media outlets, such as CNN, NBC, ABC, MSNBC, and also Fox News.
See: Google Search is the Greatest Mind Control Brainwashing Tool in the History of Mankind.
Laura Ingram and Tucker Carlson on Fox will at times give exposure to these doctors, but they will also probably politicize it and use it to attack Democrats and Joe Biden, even though this is clearly a non-partisan issue.
In spite of this overt censorship, the news seems to be getting out, and as we reported yesterday, hundreds of thousands of people took to the streets to protest in Europe over the weekend.
See: Hydroxychloroquine Scandal Spurs Hundreds of Thousands to Protest in Europe, While Americans Mostly Just Comply.
Because English is now the common language among the educated around the world, hundreds of thousands of readers from India and Africa have also been coming to Health Impact News to learn the truth about HCQ during the past few days.
The question now is will Americans wake up in time to free themselves of this medical tyranny, or just mostly continue to willingly comply with their own destruction?
Here is today’s broadcast from Dr. Ron Paul (also a medical doctor) and his Liberty Report titled:
Waking Up? More Americans Skeptical Of Media’s Covid Narrative
Quote:
This is a political thing (mandating face masks), this is not a medical argument. And people who think this is a medical argument alone, they’re completely wrong. This is all politics.
I think it was orchestrated. I think Black Lives Matter, Coronavirus, and the Federal Reserve have combined to bring us one of the most disastrous challenges to our economy and the world economy in the history of the world.
And its just beginning, and that’s threatening, and that’s why I am warning people to wake up!
Watch the full report: