humansarefree--2020-07-04--Nobel Laureate for Science on Covid-19 Lockdown: ‘The Level of Stupidity Going On Here Is Amazing’

As many of you reading this may already be aware , a number of prominent scientists around the world have been “ muzzled ’ so to speak when it comes to their positions on COVID-19 .
Their YouTube videos have been censored , and they have not been given any air time on mainstream media .
This has made it so only a few perspectives are aired to the masses .
Mainstream media also began a ridicule campaign against these types of scientists , while organizations like Facebook and the World Health Organization ( WHO ) chose to censor anything @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Should we not have the opportunity to examine research and opinions for ourselves to determine our truth ?
Why are they being hidden from us ?
Why do we constantly rely on big organizations that have a track record of fraud and corruption ?
Many topics are controversial , and experts sharing opinions on it should have the right to share their thoughts without them being labelled as false or incorrect .
We have had trouble during COVID wit fact checkers .
Merely writing articles like this sharing science informed opinions shared @ @ @ @ @ @ @ news ” strikes .
We ’ re never given an opportunity to discuss why something is false , we simply are strong armed into removing our content .
This particular article may be marked as false as well in the coming days .
But how can that be ?
How can sharing an expert opinion and information based on scientific data be “ false ” and deemed punishable ?
This is also something brought up in the video below .
While this censorship seems crazy , there ’ s another side to it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ aware of a big problem that exists today within science , politics and media – that is often not scientific , not honest and works to mislead people .
The politicization of science has led to such things like people believing that products like Glyphosate are safe .
We saw this in the past with things like Agent Orange , DDT , Tobacco and more .
Products that are found to harm people , go through a 15 – 20 year period of denial before admissions come out and no one is held @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about science , it ’ s about what can compliment the choices of big corporations that dominate government policy .
Is science in this sense being used to help humanity thrive ?
Or is it used to make certain people wealthy at the expense of thee masses ?
In the video below , Michael Levitt , a Biophysicist and a professor of structural biology at Stanford University , calls out the WHO as well as Facebook for censoring information .
He ’ s also one of many scientists who have called into question @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as well he has criticized the lockdown measures that have been taken across the globe , explaining how it ’ s caused a lot of needless suffering and damage .
He also mentioned like other things could have been done , simply masks without lockdown might have been sufficient according to him , but I disagree .
He also mentioned that lockdowns can be effective for the pandemic , but again , obviously feels it wasn ’ t necessary for this one .
Furthermore , he points to the politicization of science , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ make moves not based on data and science , but rather economics and politics .
When Dr. Ron Paul shared his opinion a few months ago that “ People should ask themselves whether this coronavirus “ pandemic ” could be a big hoax , with the actual danger of the disease massively exaggerated by those who seek to profit – financially or politically – from the ensuing panic ” he was censored and marked as false news , having his social media distribution limited .
That is not to say the disease is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from coronavirus .
Those in vulnerable categories should take precautions to limit their risk of exposure .
But we have seen this movie before .
Government over-hypes a threat as an excuse to grab more of our freedoms .
When the “ threat ” is over , however , they never give us our freedoms back .
( source ) It ’ s not only doctors and scientists , but many researchers and figures like NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden .
Levitt became quite a popular name across China .
He offered the Chinese @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the outbreak there , as he had determined , after investigating and crunching some numbers , that the virus will come to a halt .
Why can ’ t we discuss these things openly and freely ?
Why are these views harshly censored , ridiculed and wrongly deemed as false ?
Almost all of the science we were hearing , for example like organizations like the World Health Organization ( WHO ) was wrong… This has been a disgraceful situation for science… Reports were released openly , shared by email , and all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you got to see that everything I said in that first six weeks was actually true and for political reasons , we as scientists let our views be corrupted .
The data had very clear things to say .
Nobody said to be “ let me check your numbers ” they all just said “ stop talking like that.
” – Levitt The video below has since “ gone private.
” There is another clip of the discussion , although not the full one , here .
I am not sure how long @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
At the end of the day , we have to keep asking ourselves if our designated government and global health authorities actually have our best interests at hand .
If not , why do we continue to support it ?
There are many examples that show these institutions do not work to make humanity thrive , but instead oppress humanity .
When it comes to the World Health Organization ( WHO ) for example , Wikileaks exposed how much they are influenced by pharmaceutical companies .
Vimeo also recently completely banned a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ That particular documentary featured many scientists , doctors and even officials from within the WHO .
It ’ s quite clear to many that government doesn ’ t really put the citizens it claims to represent first , but instead corporations and big money .
So why do we constantly listen to their advice ?
Why do we constantly rely on them for truth and information ?
Why do we rely on them for guidance ?
Would we not be better off determining for ourselves what is appropriate , especially in the face @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is being exposed ?
Is it time humanity becomes self-governed ?
Is it time we steep away from the need for such parental figures like government ?
It seems like we are currently in the process of doing this , with many of us beginning to awaken .
Collectively , we will be creating a new world , that matches a consciousness of self-governance , and the key is to operate from a place of oneness and peace within , which is a journey of awakening to who we truly are , as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to think .
We are in a time of a consciousness renaissance .

As many of you reading this may already be aware, a number of prominent scientists around the world have been “muzzled’ so to speak when it comes to their positions on COVID-19.
Their YouTube videos have been censored, and they have not been given any air time on mainstream media. This has made it so only a few perspectives are aired to the masses.
Mainstream media also began a ridicule campaign against these types of scientists, while organizations like Facebook and the World Health Organization (WHO) chose to censor anything that contradicts the WHO’s position.
Should we not have the opportunity to examine research and opinions for ourselves to determine our truth? Why are they being hidden from us? Why do we constantly rely on big organizations that have a track record of fraud and corruption?
Many topics are controversial, and experts sharing opinions on it should have the right to share their thoughts without them being labelled as false or incorrect.
We have had trouble during COVID wit fact checkers. Merely writing articles like this sharing science informed opinions shared of these scientists results in “fake news” strikes.
We’re never given an opportunity to discuss why something is false, we simply are strong armed into removing our content.
This particular article may be marked as false as well in the coming days. But how can that be?
How can sharing an expert opinion and information based on scientific data be “false” and deemed punishable? This is also something brought up in the video below.
While this censorship seems crazy, there’s another side to it. It is s making more people aware of a big problem that exists today within science, politics and media – that is often not scientific, not honest and works to mislead people.
The politicization of science has led to such things like people believing that products like Glyphosate are safe. We saw this in the past with things like Agent Orange, DDT, Tobacco and more. Products that are found to harm people, go through a 15 – 20 year period of denial before admissions come out and no one is held accountable.
Science today isn’t about science, it’s about what can compliment the choices of big corporations that dominate government policy.
Is science in this sense being used to help humanity thrive? Or is it used to make certain people wealthy at the expense of thee masses?
In the video below, Michael Levitt, a Biophysicist and a professor of structural biology at Stanford University, calls out the WHO as well as Facebook for censoring information.
He’s also one of many scientists who have called into question the severity of the new coronavirus, as well he has criticized the lockdown measures that have been taken across the globe, explaining how it’s caused a lot of needless suffering and damage.
He also mentioned like other things could have been done, simply masks without lockdown might have been sufficient according to him, but I disagree.
He also mentioned that lockdowns can be effective for the pandemic, but again, obviously feels it wasn’t necessary for this one.
Furthermore, he points to the politicization of science, and how we are being forced to make moves not based on data and science, but rather economics and politics.
When Dr. Ron Paul shared his opinion a few months ago that “People should ask themselves whether this coronavirus “pandemic” could be a big hoax, with the actual danger of the disease massively exaggerated by those who seek to profit – financially or politically – from the ensuing panic” he was censored and marked as false news, having his social media distribution limited.
That is not to say the disease is harmless. Without question people will die from coronavirus. Those in vulnerable categories should take precautions to limit their risk of exposure. But we have seen this movie before. Government over-hypes a threat as an excuse to grab more of our freedoms. When the “threat” is over, however, they never give us our freedoms back. (source)
It’s not only doctors and scientists, but many researchers and figures like NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden.
Levitt became quite a popular name across China. He offered the Chinese public some reassurance during the peak of the outbreak there, as he had determined, after investigating and crunching some numbers, that the virus will come to a halt.
Why can’t we discuss these things openly and freely? Why are these views harshly censored, ridiculed and wrongly deemed as false?
Almost all of the science we were hearing, for example like organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) was wrong… This has been a disgraceful situation for science… Reports were released openly, shared by email, and all I got back was abuse.
And you got to see that everything I said in that first six weeks was actually true and for political reasons, we as scientists let our views be corrupted. The data had very clear things to say. Nobody said to be “let me check your numbers” they all just said “stop talking like that.” – Levitt
Watch the full clip below:
The video below has since “gone private.” There is another clip of the discussion, although not the full one, here. I am not sure how long this particular one will be on YouTube.
The Takeaway
At the end of the day, we have to keep asking ourselves if our designated government and global health authorities actually have our best interests at hand. If not, why do we continue to support it?
There are many examples that show these institutions do not work to make humanity thrive, but instead oppress humanity.
When it comes to the World Health Organization (WHO) for example, Wikileaks exposed how much they are influenced by pharmaceutical companies.
Vimeo also recently completely banned a documentary that exposed the same thing. That particular documentary featured many scientists, doctors and even officials from within the WHO.
It’s quite clear to many that government doesn’t really put the citizens it claims to represent first, but instead corporations and big money.
So why do we constantly listen to their advice? Why do we constantly rely on them for truth and information?
Why do we rely on them for guidance? Would we not be better off determining for ourselves what is appropriate, especially in the face of such controversial times when so much is being exposed?
Is it time humanity becomes self-governed? Is it time we steep away from the need for such parental figures like government? It seems like we are currently in the process of doing this, with many of us beginning to awaken.
Collectively, we will be creating a new world, that matches a consciousness of self-governance, and the key is to operate from a place of oneness and peace within, which is a journey of awakening to who we truly are, as opposed to what we have been taught to think. We are in a time of a consciousness renaissance.
Reference: Collective-evolution.com


humansarefree--2020-07-04--George Soros in Davos: 2020 Election Will Determine ‘Fate of the World’

Left-wing billionaire George Soros reportedly warned that the 2020 election will determine the “ fate of the world ” and lashed out at President Donald Trump during a private dinner event at the World Economic Forum in Davos , Switzerland .
Soros , the 89-year-old founder of the progressive advocacy organization Open Society Foundations , accused the president of being a “ con man ” and a “ narcissist ” who wants the world to “ revolve around him , ” according to CNBC .
“ When his fantasy of becoming president became a reality , ” his ego swelled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This has turned his narcissism into a malignant disease.
” Soros , who has yet to endorse a 2020 Democrat candidate , then said that this year ’ s election will decide the “ fate of the world , ” CNBC reports .
In October , the billionaire argued White House contender Sen. Elizabeth Warren ( D-MA ) is the “ most qualified to be president , ” but stopped short of formally throwing his support behind her .
This , of course , is not the first time the hedge fund manager @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the World Economic Forum .
Last year , Soros criticized the president ’ s negotiating style against China , which culminated in the signing of a phase one trade agreement last Wednesday .
“ Regrettably , President Trump seems to be following a different course : Make concessions to China and declare victory while renewing his attacks on U.S. allies , ” Soros said at the time .
“ This is liable to undermine the U.S. policy objective of curbing China ’ s abuses and excesses.
” At this year ’ s event @ @ @ @ @ @ @ leader Xi Jinping for his government ’ s use of a totalitarian social credit scoring system on Chinese citizens .
Xi is using “ artificial intelligence to have total control of his people , ” Soros warned .
He also mused that China ’ s president is “ trying to exploit ” President Trump on trade .
These remarks follow President Trump ’ s speech before the World Economic Forum , in which he touted his America First economic policies as a model for global prosperity .
“ A nation ’ s highest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” the president told attendees .
“ Honoring this truth is the only way to build faith and confidence in the market system .
Only when governments put their own people first will people be fully invested in their national futures.
” “ A pro-worker , pro-citizen , pro-family agenda demonstrates how a nation can thrive when its communities , its companies , its government work together for the good of the whole nation , ” he added .
President Trump also used the speech to reject climate alarmism , which loomed large @ @ @ @ @ @ @ partly due to teen climate activist Greta Thunberg ’ s attendance .
“ These alarmists always demand the same thing – absolute power to dominate , transform , and control every aspect of our lives , ” the president stated .
“ We ’ re committed to conserving the majesty of God ’ s creation and the natural beauty of our world .
”

Left-wing billionaire George Soros reportedly warned that the 2020 election will determine the “fate of the world” and lashed out at President Donald Trump during a private dinner event at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.
Soros, the 89-year-old founder of the progressive advocacy organization Open Society Foundations, accused the president of being a “con man” and a “narcissist” who wants the world to “revolve around him,” according to CNBC.
“When his fantasy of becoming president became a reality,” his ego swelled, Soros said, adding: “This has turned his narcissism into a malignant disease.”
Soros, who has yet to endorse a 2020 Democrat candidate, then said that this year’s election will decide the “fate of the world,” CNBC reports.
In October, the billionaire argued White House contender Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) is the “most qualified to be president,” but stopped short of formally throwing his support behind her.
This, of course, is not the first time the hedge fund manager has taken aim at President Trump at the World Economic Forum.
Last year, Soros criticized the president’s negotiating style against China, which culminated in the signing of a phase one trade agreement last Wednesday.
“Regrettably, President Trump seems to be following a different course: Make concessions to China and declare victory while renewing his attacks on U.S. allies,” Soros said at the time.
“This is liable to undermine the U.S. policy objective of curbing China’s abuses and excesses.”
At this year’s event, Soros also lambasted Chinese Communist Party leader Xi Jinping for his government’s use of a totalitarian social credit scoring system on Chinese citizens.
Xi is using “artificial intelligence to have total control of his people,” Soros warned. He also mused that China’s president is “trying to exploit” President Trump on trade.
These remarks follow President Trump’s speech before the World Economic Forum, in which he touted his America First economic policies as a model for global prosperity.
“A nation’s highest duty is to its own citizens,” the president told attendees.
“Honoring this truth is the only way to build faith and confidence in the market system. Only when governments put their own people first will people be fully invested in their national futures.”
“A pro-worker, pro-citizen, pro-family agenda demonstrates how a nation can thrive when its communities, its companies, its government work together for the good of the whole nation,” he added.
President Trump also used the speech to reject climate alarmism, which loomed large over this year’s event, partly due to teen climate activist Greta Thunberg’s attendance.
“These alarmists always demand the same thing – absolute power to dominate, transform, and control every aspect of our lives,” the president stated.
“We’re committed to conserving the majesty of God’s creation and the natural beauty of our world.”
Source: Breitbart.com


humansarefree--2020-07-04--UN’s New World Order Website Shows A DESPERATE Deep State

The United Nations recently launched a new website ( unnwo.org ) and initiative called United Nations New World Order .
Yes , that is exactly what it sounds like .
When I first heard this story , I assumed it was fake news .
But after investigating , nothing could be further from the truth .
A Yahoo News article was posted on the 19th of March , confirming that the site and initiative are indeed real .
What could this mean ?
What ’ s more , the Yahoo news article announcing the UN NWO “ COVID 19 Coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Theme HAPPINESS FOR ALL TOGETHER ” was released on March 19th , 2020 .
To go with that announcement , a website was launched called UN NWO .
I know , it seems too obvious to be real .
But it is a legitimate site by the United Nations .
March 19th , is the first day of the 40 day season of sacrifice , wherein various sacrificial rites were exercised in the deep past in an attempt to secure a bountiful harvest for the year ahead .
Many new world order and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ places great emphasis on occult holidays and the use of black magic rituals to further their plans , which is why so many attacks seem to take place in this 40 day period .
As many well versed researchers state with respect to occult rituals : “ You might not believe in any of this , but they do.
” Here are a few quotes from the Yahoo News article about the UN NWO : Let us unite and work together to win this global fight , and to achieve the happiness , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on earth , ” said Ndaba Mandela , UNAIDS Global Ambassador , Co founder of the United Nations New World Order Project , and Chairman of the Mandela Institute for Humanity .
“ The long term mission of the United Nations International Day of Happiness is the happiness , wellbeing , and freedom of all life on earth , achieved through advancing happiness as a human right , and happiness as a new holistic approach to economic development , as called for in UN resolutions 65309 , 66281 , and the first UN @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which called for the definition of a ‘ new economic paradigm ’ of Gross Global Happiness.
” The initiative to further happiness sounds good on the surface .
But as many psychologists over the years have suggested , pursuing happiness isn ’ t really possible as a goal unto itself , nor can it be standardized in a grand way because life fulfillment is unique to each person .
But the debate about whether it ’ s possible to enshrine happiness as a protected human right is a discussion for another article @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , it confirms the United Nations New World Order project is indeed real .
And it makes a link to a dark occult holiday .
This establishes a point of suspicion at the very least .
Never Let A Crisis Go to Waste , Typical Slogan of New World Order Ideologues What we do know for sure is that globalists and NWO deep state actors adhere to the idea that you never let a crisis go to waste .
“ You never let a serious crisis go to waste .
And what I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.
” – Rahm Emanuel It is also believed that Winston Churchill uttered this slogan .
“ Never let a good crisis go to waste.
” New World Order Translation : Never let a crisis go to waste .
In this case , the crisis is coronavirus and the agenda is mass surveillance ( contact tracing ) , mandatory vaccination , and restricting the right to travel or engage in commerce unless you ’ ve been deemed “ safe ” by the coronavirus @ @

The United Nations recently launched a new website (unnwo.org) and initiative called United Nations New World Order. Yes, that is exactly what it sounds like.
When I first heard this story, I assumed it was fake news. But after investigating, nothing could be further from the truth. A Yahoo News article was posted on the 19th of March, confirming that the site and initiative are indeed real. What could this mean?
United Nations New World Order Initiative Announced on Occult Holiday
What’s more, the Yahoo news article announcing the UN NWO “COVID 19 Coronavirus Focused International Day of Happiness 2020 Campaign Theme HAPPINESS FOR ALL TOGETHER” was released on March 19th, 2020. To go with that announcement, a website was launched called UN NWO.
I know, it seems too obvious to be real. But it is a legitimate site by the United Nations.
March 19th, is the first day of the 40 day season of sacrifice, wherein various sacrificial rites were exercised in the deep past in an attempt to secure a bountiful harvest for the year ahead.
Many new world order and deep state researchers suggest that the cabal places great emphasis on occult holidays and the use of black magic rituals to further their plans, which is why so many attacks seem to take place in this 40 day period.
Waco Massacre on April 19th, 1993
Oklahoma City Bombing April 19th, 1995
Deep Water Horizon Oil Spill April 20th, 2010
As many well versed researchers state with respect to occult rituals: “You might not believe in any of this, but they do.”
Here are a few quotes from the Yahoo News article about the UN NWO:
Let us unite and work together to win this global fight, and to achieve the happiness, wellbeing, and freedom of all life on earth,” said Ndaba Mandela, UNAIDS Global Ambassador, Co founder of the United Nations New World Order Project, and Chairman of the Mandela Institute for Humanity.
“The long term mission of the United Nations International Day of Happiness is the happiness, wellbeing, and freedom of all life on earth, achieved through advancing happiness as a human right, and happiness as a new holistic approach to economic development, as called for in UN resolutions 65309, 66281, and the first UN High Level Meeting on Happiness and Wellbeing, which called for the definition of a ‘new economic paradigm’ of Gross Global Happiness.”
The initiative to further happiness sounds good on the surface.
But as many psychologists over the years have suggested, pursuing happiness isn’t really possible as a goal unto itself, nor can it be standardized in a grand way because life fulfillment is unique to each person.
But the debate about whether it’s possible to enshrine happiness as a protected human right is a discussion for another article.
The above article does two things, it confirms the United Nations New World Order project is indeed real. And it makes a link to a dark occult holiday.
This establishes a point of suspicion at the very least.
Never Let A Crisis Go to Waste, Typical Slogan of New World Order Ideologues
What we do know for sure is that globalists and NWO deep state actors adhere to the idea that you never let a crisis go to waste.
“You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it’s an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.” – Rahm Emanuel
It is also believed that Winston Churchill uttered this slogan.
“Never let a good crisis go to waste.”
New World Order Translation: Never let a crisis go to waste.
In this case, the crisis is coronavirus and the agenda is mass surveillance (contact tracing), mandatory vaccination, and restricting the right to travel or engage in commerce unless you’ve been deemed “safe” by the coronavirus authorities.
Source: Stillnessinthestorm.com (excerpts)


humansarefree--2020-07-04--CNN Refers to Washington and Jefferson as Just ‘Two Slave Owners’ While Covering Mt. Rushmore Event

The resentment for America at CNN was on full display during Independence Day weekend , particularly as a CNN pundit @ @ @ @ @ as just a couple of slave owners .
During the network ’ s coverage of @ @ @ @ @ speech at Mt .
Rushmore , Leyla Santiago said that : “ President Trump will @ @ @ @ @ where he ’ ll be standing in front of a monument of two slave owners @ @ @ @ @ from Native Americans.
” The remarkably anti-American commentary lit social media ablaze , with patriots @ @ @ @ @ their hostility towards our nation .
“ CNN has reduced the Founding Fathers of America @ @ @ @ @ Jefferson to just ‘ two slave owners , ’ ” JT Lewis , whose brother @ @ @ @ @ shooting in Sandy Hook , tweeted .
“ CNN hates America.
” The segment was @ @ @ @ @ covered Bernie Sanders appearing at Mt .
Rushmore in 2016 .

The resentment for America at CNN was on full display during Independence Day weekend, particularly as a CNN pundit referred to the Founding Fathers as just a couple of slave owners.
During the network’s coverage of President Donald Trump’s speech at Mt. Rushmore, Leyla Santiago said that:
“President Trump will be at Mount Rushmore, where he’ll be standing in front of a monument of two slave owners and on land wrestled away from Native Americans.”
The remarkably anti-American commentary lit social media ablaze, with patriots absolutely shredding the network for their hostility towards our nation.
Only racists celebrate the 4th of July pic.twitter.com/jLeT0mL5kY — Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) July 3, 2020
“CNN has reduced the Founding Fathers of America, George Washington and Thomas Jefferson to just ‘two slave owners,’” JT Lewis, whose brother was killed during the school shooting in Sandy Hook, tweeted. “CNN hates America.”
CNN has reduced the Founding Fathers of America, George Washington and Thomas Jefferson to just “two slave owners.” CNN hates America. https://t.co/xKxm8PWX8x — JT Lewis (@thejtlewis) July 4, 2020
The segment was wildly different than how they covered Bernie Sanders appearing at Mt. Rushmore in 2016.
Source: Thegatewaypundit.com


humansarefree--2020-07-04--Huge COVID Case-counting Deception at the CDC

For this piece , we have to enter the official world ( of the insane ) — where everyone is quite sure a new coronavirus was discovered in China and the worthless diagnostic tests mean something and the case numbers are real and meaningful .
Once we execute all those absurd maneuvers , we land square in the middle of yet another scandal — this time at our favorite US agency for scandals , the CDC .
The Atlantic , May 21 , has the story , headlined , “ How could the CDC make that mistake ?
” I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and then comment on the stark inference The Atlantic somehow failed to grasp .
“ We ’ ve learned that the CDC is making , at best , a debilitating mistake : combining test results that diagnose current coronavirus infections with test results that measure whether someone has ever had the virus… “ The agency confirmed to The Atlantic on Wednesday that it is mixing the results of viral [ PCR ] and antibody tests , even though the two tests reveal different information and are used for different reasons.
” “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ site of one of the country ’ s largest outbreaks , as well as Texas , Georgia , and Vermont — are blending the data in the same way .
“ Virginia likewise mixed viral and antibody test results until last week , but it reversed course and the governor apologized for the practice after it was covered by the Richmond Times-Dispatch and The Atlantic .
“ Maine similarly separated its data on Wednesday ; Vermont authorities claimed they didn ’ t even know they were doing this.
” “ ’ You ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ Ashish Jha , the K. T. Li Professor of Global Health at Harvard and the director of the Harvard Global Health Institute , told us when we described what the CDC was doing .
‘ How could the CDC make that mistake ?
This is a mess ’ .
” “ The CDC stopped publishing anything resembling a complete database of daily [ COVID ] test results on February 29 .
When it resumed publishing test data last week [ the middle of May ] … ” First of all , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disease statistics on an ongoing basis .
Reporting partial data flies in the face of what they ’ re supposed to be all about .
But the big deal , of course , is combining results from two different tests—the PCR and the antibody—and placing them in one lump .
I ’ ve read the Atlantic article forwards , backwards , and sideways , and it appears the experts believe only PCR viral tests should be used to count the number of COVID cases .
So here is a takeaway I find nowhere @ @ @ @ @ @ @ TWO TESTS WILL VASTLY INFLATE THE NUMBER OF CASES .
I ’ m not talking about categories like “ rate of infection ” or “ percentage.
” I ’ m talking about plain numbers of cases .
Some PCR tests will indicate COVID and some antibody tests will indicate COVID , and adding them together will pump up the number of cases .
You know , that big number they flash on TV screens a hundred times a day .
“ Coronavirus cases jumped up again yesterday , and the grand total in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ media and government and related con artists deploy to scare the people and justify lockdowns and use to stop reopening the economy .
The brass band circus with flying acrobats and elephants and clown numbers .
Therefore , I ’ m not characterizing what the CDC is doing as a mistake .
They ’ ve managed to create the illusion that absolute case numbers are higher than they should be .
Somehow , these “ mistakes ” always seem to result in worse news , not better news .
The “ errors ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than the low side .
Case in point : the computer prediction of COVID deaths in the UK and US made by that abject failure , Neil Ferguson , whose track record , going back to 2001 , has been one horrendous lunatic exaggeration after another .
His 2020 projections of 500,000 COVID deaths in the UK and two million in the US were directly used to justify lockdowns in many countries .
The CDC , back in 2009 , stopped reporting the number of Swine Flu cases in the US—while still claiming @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thousands .
I ’ ve written in great detail about the scandal , which was exposed by then-CBS investigative reporter , Sharyl Attkisson .
The CDC stopped counting cases , because the overwhelming percentage of tissue samples from patients was coming back from labs with no sign of Swine Flu or any other kind of flu .
And yet , in a later retrospective “ analysis , ” the CDC claimed that , at the height of the “ epidemic , ” there were 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the US @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2003 and SARS , the CDC and other public health agencies around the world hyped the dangers to the sky ; the final official death count , globally , when the dust cleared ?
800 .
There is a tradition of lying on the high side , blowing up figures in order to create the illusion of destruction .
CDC ?
Mistake ?
The agency is certainly incompetent .
But that ’ s just the beginning of the story .
The only time they say there is no danger is when they ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
My headline for the Atlantic article would read : SO HOW MANY COVID CASES SHOULD WE SUBTRACT TO GET THE ACTUAL NUMBER ?
And the first paragraph would go this way : “ Just when governors are trying to reopen their economies , a gigantic case-counting deception at the CDC is taking the wind out of their sails .
“ The millions of Americans suffering financial devastation could be pushed back into a hole .
Who is screaming to high heaven about THAT on the nightly news ?
No one .
Why @ @ @

by Jon Rappoport
For this piece, we have to enter the official world (of the insane) — where everyone is quite sure a new coronavirus was discovered in China and the worthless diagnostic tests mean something and the case numbers are real and meaningful.
Once we execute all those absurd maneuvers, we land square in the middle of yet another scandal — this time at our favorite US agency for scandals, the CDC.
The Atlantic, May 21, has the story, headlined, “How could the CDC make that mistake?”
I’ll give you the key quotes, and then comment on the stark inference The Atlantic somehow failed to grasp.
“We’ve learned that the CDC is making, at best, a debilitating mistake: combining test results that diagnose current coronavirus infections with test results that measure whether someone has ever had the virus…
“The agency confirmed to The Atlantic on Wednesday that it is mixing the results of viral [PCR] and antibody tests, even though the two tests reveal different information and are used for different reasons.”
“Several states — including Pennsylvania, the site of one of the country’s largest outbreaks, as well as Texas, Georgia, and Vermont — are blending the data in the same way.
“Virginia likewise mixed viral and antibody test results until last week, but it reversed course and the governor apologized for the practice after it was covered by the Richmond Times-Dispatch and The Atlantic.
“Maine similarly separated its data on Wednesday; Vermont authorities claimed they didn’t even know they were doing this.”
“’You’ve got to be kidding me,’ Ashish Jha, the K. T. Li Professor of Global Health at Harvard and the director of the Harvard Global Health Institute, told us when we described what the CDC was doing. ‘How could the CDC make that mistake? This is a mess’.”
“The CDC stopped publishing anything resembling a complete database of daily [COVID] test results on February 29. When it resumed publishing test data last week [the middle of May]…”
First of all, the CDC’s basic mission is publishing disease statistics on an ongoing basis. Reporting partial data flies in the face of what they’re supposed to be all about.
But the big deal, of course, is combining results from two different tests—the PCR and the antibody—and placing them in one lump.
I’ve read the Atlantic article forwards, backwards, and sideways, and it appears the experts believe only PCR viral tests should be used to count the number of COVID cases.
So here is a takeaway I find nowhere in the Atlantic article: COMBINING THE TWO TESTS WILL VASTLY INFLATE THE NUMBER OF CASES.
I’m not talking about categories like “rate of infection” or “percentage.” I’m talking about plain numbers of cases.
Some PCR tests will indicate COVID and some antibody tests will indicate COVID, and adding them together will pump up the number of cases. You know, that big number they flash on TV screens a hundred times a day.
“Coronavirus cases jumped up again yesterday, and the grand total in the US is now…”
THAT number.
The number media and government and related con artists deploy to scare the people and justify lockdowns and use to stop reopening the economy.
The brass band circus with flying acrobats and elephants and clown numbers.
Therefore, I’m not characterizing what the CDC is doing as a mistake. They’ve managed to create the illusion that absolute case numbers are higher than they should be.
Somehow, these “mistakes” always seem to result in worse news, not better news. The “errors” are always on the high side rather than the low side.
Case in point: the computer prediction of COVID deaths in the UK and US made by that abject failure, Neil Ferguson, whose track record, going back to 2001, has been one horrendous lunatic exaggeration after another.
His 2020 projections of 500,000 COVID deaths in the UK and two million in the US were directly used to justify lockdowns in many countries.
The CDC, back in 2009, stopped reporting the number of Swine Flu cases in the US—while still claiming that number was in the tens of thousands.
I’ve written in great detail about the scandal, which was exposed by then-CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson.
The CDC stopped counting cases, because the overwhelming percentage of tissue samples from patients was coming back from labs with no sign of Swine Flu or any other kind of flu.
And yet, in a later retrospective “analysis,” the CDC claimed that, at the height of the “epidemic,” there were 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the US.
Going all the way back to 2003 and SARS, the CDC and other public health agencies around the world hyped the dangers to the sky; the final official death count, globally, when the dust cleared? 800.
There is a tradition of lying on the high side, blowing up figures in order to create the illusion of destruction.
CDC? Mistake? The agency is certainly incompetent. But that’s just the beginning of the story.
The only time they say there is no danger is when they’re lying about the effects of jjabs.
My headline for the Atlantic article would read: SO HOW MANY COVID CASES SHOULD WE SUBTRACT TO GET THE ACTUAL NUMBER?
And the first paragraph would go this way:
“Just when governors are trying to reopen their economies, a gigantic case-counting deception at the CDC is taking the wind out of their sails.
“The millions of Americans suffering financial devastation could be pushed back into a hole. Who is screaming to high heaven about THAT on the nightly news? No one. Why not?”


humansarefree--2020-07-05--The Non-Physical Properties of Human DNA

Vladimir Poponin is a well known Russian scientist who in 1995 , with his colleagues , including biophysicist Peter Gariaev , conducted a very interesting experiment during their time at the Russian Academy of Sciences .
In their paper ( P.P .
Gariaev and V.P .
Poponin .
Vacuum DNA phantom effect in vitro and its possible rational explanation .
Nanobiology 1995 ( in press ) , Poponin states , in the introduction of the report , that , “ We believe this discovery has tremendous significance for the explanation and deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying subtle energy phenomena @ @ @ @ @ @ @ phenomena.
” Why did he feel this way ?
We will get to that .
Poponin and Gariaev tested the behaviour of DNA on photons , little tiny bits of matter , in the “ quantum ” that our world is made up of .
They put photons into a tube specially designed to simulate a vacuum , just like the vacuum of space .
With no air inside , they inserted the photons as they wanted to see what they did and how they behaved .
The photons were distributed in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , scattered all over the container .
This of course was what the team of researchers expected .
Next , samples of human DNA were placed inside the tube with the photons , and what happened next is what ’ s truly mysterious .
The photons reacted to the DNA , and changed their pattern and formed a specific alignment .
In the presence of living material , the human DNA , the photons organized !
This signified that the DNA was clearly having a direct influence over the photons .
It ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ something within us has a direct affect on the physical material matter outside of us .
This experiment was repeated and confirmed , and it was further observed that human DNA has a direct affect on the quantum ‘ stuff ’ that our world is made up of .
Fascinating to say the least .
The next big surprise was observed when the researchers removed the DNA from the container .
The scientists assumed that the photons would simply return to their original scattered state , but this didn ’ t happen .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ if the DNA were still in the tube .
Poponin described the light as behaving “ surprisingly and counter-intuitively.
” The researchers hypothesized and were “ forced to accept the working hypothesis that some new field structure is being excited.
” Is there something being left behind ?
Something in non-physical form ?
This experiment tells us that DNA is communicating with the ‘ stuff ’ our world is made of , and that there is some sort of invisible field that exists .
Perhaps DNA represents a place of storage and communications @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
To others in the universe who have left their mark , so to speak .
Who knows .
Nobel laureate of the twentieth century Richard Feynman once said , with regards to quantum mechanics , “ we choose to examine a phenomenon which is impossible , absolutely impossible , to explain in any classical way , and which has in it the heart of quantum mechanics .
In reality , it contains the only mystery.
” Another great quote that comes to mind anytime the world of science dives deep into the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ There seems to be a deep concern that the whole field will be tarnished by studying a phenomenon that is tainted by its association with superstition , spiritualism and magic .
Protecting against this possibility sometimes seems more important than encouraging scientific exploration or protecting academic freedom .
But this may be changing.
” – Cassandra Vieten , PhD and President/CEO at the Institute of Noetic Sciences ( source ) The reason why the association with superstition , spiritualism and magic mentioned in the quote above exists when it comes to examining certain @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is unexplainable .
But it ’ s important to remember , just because something is unexplainable does not mean that it ’ s not real , it simply means we don ’ t fully understand it yet .
Academia has a long history of rejecting phenomenon , that ’ s clearly real , yet simply unexplainable .
Quantum physics clearly has a strong connection to consciousness , and metaphysical phenomenon .
Max Planck , a physicist who originated quantum theory , regarded consciousness as “ fundamental , ” and matter as “ derivative @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we can not get behind consciousness .
Everything that we talk about , everything that we regard as existing , postulates consciousness.
” This has been demonstrated quite clearly by multiple experiments , like the quantum double slit experiment .
A paper published in the peer-reviewed journal Physics Essays by Dean Radin , PhD , explains how this experiment has been used multiple times to explore the role of consciousness in shaping the nature of physical reality .
( source ) In this experiment , a double-slit optical system was used to test @ @ @ @ @ @ @ collapse of the quantum wave-function .
Photons were shot through two slits , in multiple different ways .
The study found that factors associated with consciousness “ significantly ” correlated in predicted ways with perturbations in the double slit interference pattern .
In this experiment , tiny bits of matter ( photons , electrons , or any atomic-sized object ) are shot towards a screen that has two slits in it .
On the other side of the screen , a high tech video camera records where each photon lands .
When scientists @ @ @ @ @ @ @ show us an expected pattern , as seen in the video below .
But when both slits are opened , an “ interference pattern ” emerges — they begin to act like waves .
You can refer to the actual study to find out more about that .
( source ) If you want to see a visual demonstration of the quantum double slit experiment , here ’ s a great little short animation .
The point is , consciousness changes the behaviour of the particles .
“ Observation not only disturbs what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it .
We compel the electron to assume a definite position .
We ourselves produce the results of the measurement.
” ( source ) The study sourced above points out that “ factors associated with consciousness , such as meditation experience , electrocortical markers of focused attention , and psychological factors including openness and absorption , significantly correlated in predicted ways with perturbations in the double-slit interference pattern .
The results appear to be consistent with a consciousness-related interpretation of the quantum measurement problem.
” DNA is fascinating , and it ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ biology .
There are definitely interesting metaphysical non-material aspects to our DNA , and changes to our DNA can come as a result of our thoughts , feelings and emotions alone .
HeartMath researchers have shown that physical aspects of DNA strands could be influenced by human intention .
The article , Modulation of DNA Conformation by Heart-Focused Intention – McCraty , Atkinson , Tomasino , 2003 – describes experiments that achieved such results .
( source ) We have so much more to learn and discover about human DNA , and DNA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interdimensional aspects to it , but it ’ s a deep topic that goes far beyond the discussion of the phantom DNA effect .
This article doesn ’ t even scratch the surface when it comes to studies within the realm of consciousness , and non material science .
What ’ s good to know is that more people are becoming aware of non-material science .
If you ’ re interested in this , I suggest you start doing more research into quantum physics and parapsychology .

Vladimir Poponin is a well known Russian scientist who in 1995, with his colleagues, including biophysicist Peter Gariaev, conducted a very interesting experiment during their time at the Russian Academy of Sciences.
In their paper (P.P. Gariaev and V.P. Poponin. Vacuum DNA phantom effect in vitro and its possible rational explanation.
Nanobiology 1995 (in press), Poponin states, in the introduction of the report, that,
“We believe this discovery has tremendous significance for the explanation and deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying subtle energy phenomena including many of the observed alternative healing phenomena.”
Why did he feel this way? We will get to that.
Poponin and Gariaev tested the behaviour of DNA on photons, little tiny bits of matter, in the “quantum” that our world is made up of. They put photons into a tube specially designed to simulate a vacuum, just like the vacuum of space.
With no air inside, they inserted the photons as they wanted to see what they did and how they behaved.
The photons were distributed in a way that was completely unordered and random, scattered all over the container. This of course was what the team of researchers expected.
Next, samples of human DNA were placed inside the tube with the photons, and what happened next is what’s truly mysterious. The photons reacted to the DNA, and changed their pattern and formed a specific alignment.
In the presence of living material, the human DNA, the photons organized! This signified that the DNA was clearly having a direct influence over the photons.
It’s one of many examples hypothesizing that something within us has a direct affect on the physical material matter outside of us.
This experiment was repeated and confirmed, and it was further observed that human DNA has a direct affect on the quantum ‘stuff’ that our world is made up of. Fascinating to say the least.
The Next Big Surprise
The next big surprise was observed when the researchers removed the DNA from the container. The scientists assumed that the photons would simply return to their original scattered state, but this didn’t happen.
Instead, the photons remained ordered as if the DNA were still in the tube. Poponin described the light as behaving “surprisingly and counter-intuitively.”
The researchers hypothesized and were “forced to accept the working hypothesis that some new field structure is being excited.”
Is there something being left behind? Something in non-physical form?
This experiment tells us that DNA is communicating with the ‘stuff’ our world is made of, and that there is some sort of invisible field that exists.
Perhaps DNA represents a place of storage and communications to the past? To the future? To others in the universe who have left their mark, so to speak. Who knows.
Quantum Physics and Consciousness
Nobel laureate of the twentieth century Richard Feynman once said, with regards to quantum mechanics, “we choose to examine a phenomenon which is impossible, absolutely impossible, to explain in any classical way, and which has in it the heart of quantum mechanics. In reality, it contains the only mystery.”
Another great quote that comes to mind anytime the world of science dives deep into the mysterious world of quantum physics:
“There seems to be a deep concern that the whole field will be tarnished by studying a phenomenon that is tainted by its association with superstition, spiritualism and magic. Protecting against this possibility sometimes seems more important than encouraging scientific exploration or protecting academic freedom. But this may be changing.” – Cassandra Vieten, PhD and President/CEO at the Institute of Noetic Sciences (source)
The reason why the association with superstition, spiritualism and magic mentioned in the quote above exists when it comes to examining certain phenomenon is simply because the observed phenomenon is unexplainable.
But it’s important to remember, just because something is unexplainable does not mean that it’s not real, it simply means we don’t fully understand it yet.
Academia has a long history of rejecting phenomenon, that’s clearly real, yet simply unexplainable.
Quantum physics clearly has a strong connection to consciousness, and metaphysical phenomenon.
Max Planck, a physicist who originated quantum theory, regarded consciousness as “fundamental,” and matter as “derivative from consciousness.”
He said that “we cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness.”
This has been demonstrated quite clearly by multiple experiments, like the quantum double slit experiment.
A paper published in the peer-reviewed journal Physics Essays by Dean Radin, PhD, explains how this experiment has been used multiple times to explore the role of consciousness in shaping the nature of physical reality. (source)
In this experiment, a double-slit optical system was used to test the possible role of consciousness in the collapse of the quantum wave-function. Photons were shot through two slits, in multiple different ways.
The study found that factors associated with consciousness “significantly” correlated in predicted ways with perturbations in the double slit interference pattern.
In this experiment, tiny bits of matter (photons, electrons, or any atomic-sized object) are shot towards a screen that has two slits in it.
On the other side of the screen, a high tech video camera records where each photon lands. When scientists close one slit, the camera will show us an expected pattern, as seen in the video below.
But when both slits are opened, an “interference pattern” emerges — they begin to act like waves.
You can refer to the actual study to find out more about that. (source) If you want to see a visual demonstration of the quantum double slit experiment, here’s a great little short animation.
The point is, consciousness changes the behaviour of the particles.
“Observation not only disturbs what has to be measured, they produce it. We compel the electron to assume a definite position. We ourselves produce the results of the measurement.” (source)
The study sourced above points out that “factors associated with consciousness, such as meditation experience, electrocortical markers of focused attention, and psychological factors including openness and absorption, significantly correlated in predicted ways with perturbations in the double-slit interference pattern. The results appear to be consistent with a consciousness-related interpretation of the quantum measurement problem.”
The Takeaway
DNA is fascinating, and it’s probably the least understood part of our biology.
There are definitely interesting metaphysical non-material aspects to our DNA, and changes to our DNA can come as a result of our thoughts, feelings and emotions alone. HeartMath researchers have shown that physical aspects of DNA strands could be influenced by human intention.
The article, Modulation of DNA Conformation by Heart-Focused Intention – McCraty, Atkinson, Tomasino, 2003 – describes experiments that achieved such results. (source)
We have so much more to learn and discover about human DNA, and DNA in general.
I believe there are interdimensional aspects to it, but it’s a deep topic that goes far beyond the discussion of the phantom DNA effect.
This article doesn’t even scratch the surface when it comes to studies within the realm of consciousness, and non material science. What’s good to know is that more people are becoming aware of non-material science.
If you’re interested in this, I suggest you start doing more research into quantum physics and parapsychology.
Reference: Collective-evolution.com


humansarefree--2020-07-05--Ghislaine Maxwell: No Mugshot and Her Name is Not on the Inmate Search Website

Lots of people have been questioning the arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell , who is of course Jeffrey Epstein ’ s @ @ @ @ @ time , no mugshot has been released , fueling speculation regarding the arrest .
In @ @ @ @ @ ’ s automated 24/7 inmate information line appears to confirm Maxwell is in Merrimack County @ @ @ @ @ Hampshire , despite Maxwell not appearing on the inmate search website : ‘ She knows @ @ @ @ @ ’ s victims ’ lawyer says Ghislaine Maxwell may kill herself or ‘ be silenced @ @ @ @ @ secrets on her high profile friends – as she spends her first nights in New @ @ @ @

Lots of people have been questioning the arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell, who is of course Jeffrey Epstein’s fixer.
As of this time, no mugshot has been released, fueling speculation regarding the arrest.
In this call, the jail’s automated 24/7 inmate information line appears to confirm Maxwell is in Merrimack County Jail in Boscawen, New Hampshire, despite Maxwell not appearing on the inmate search website:
New Hampshire Department of Corrections (DOC) Inmate Locator https://business.nh.gov/Inmate_locator/
‘She knows too much’: Epstein’s victims’ lawyer says Ghislaine Maxwell may kill herself or ‘be silenced’ to stop her spilling secrets on her high profile friends – as she spends her first nights in New Hampshire county jail.


humansarefree--2020-07-05--New Book On Epstein & Prince Andrew Exposes How Royal Family Orchestrated Harry & Meghan’s Exit

A new book on Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew by a royal author exposes how the Royal Family orchestrated Prince Harry and Meghan Markle ’ s exit .
The couple announced their plans to depart from the Royal Family in January through an Instagram post .
But biographer Nigel Cawthorne claims Prince Charles and Prince William leaked details of their plans for departure following Prince Andrew ’ s disastrous appearance on BBC Newsnight .
• A new book on Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew exposes how the Royal Family orchestrated Prince Harry and Meghan Markle ’ s exit • The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ new book Prince Andrew , Epstein and the Palace • The book investigates the story of the key players , allegations and counter-allegations in this unique , high-stakes royal drama • According to documents filed by Meghan ’ s legal team , she was “ prohibited from defending herself ” from vicious attacks in the press during her time as a senior working royal • Prince Charles and Prince William leaked details of their plans for departure following Prince Andrew ’ s disastrous appearance on BBC Newsnight • All of Jeffrey Epstein ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ghislaine Maxwell , now arrested by the FBI are contained in a Little Black Book • It was reported that Ghislaine sat on the Buckingham Palace throne during a private tour of the palace organised by Prince Andrew for former US president Bill Clinton Speaking on the Royally Obsessed podcast , Roberta Fiorito , the Royal commentrator said : “ There ’ s a rumour going around that Prince Charles and/or Prince William were the ones to orchestrate the timing of Harry and Meghan ’ s exit , reported the Daily Express .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ s dad want him to leave the family ?
I don ’ t think that ’ s possible.
” The claims are made in biographer Nigel Cawthorne new book Prince Andrew , Epstein and the Palace .
The book investigates the story of the key players , allegations and counter-allegations in this unique , high-stakes royal drama .
It provides a gripping and uncommon insight into the privileges enjoyed by billionaires , global power brokers and royalty .
The background of this is biographer Nigel Cawthorne new book ‘ Prince Andrew , Epstein @ @ @ @ @ @ @ some pretty explosive claims to say Charles ’ and William ’ s teams at the Palace decided to use the moment of Prince Andrew ’ s disastrous BBC Newsnight interview to start leaking stories that Harry and Meghan were about to depart their roles.
” “ Those leaks , I guess , eventually sparked the crisis talks organised by the Queen .
I don ’ t see why this is a rumour and I think Harry and Meghan made it clear it was their choice.
” According to documents filed by Meghan ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prohibited from defending herself ” from vicious attacks in the press during her time as a senior working royal .
“ The Claimant had become the subject of a large number of false and damaging articles by the UK tabloid media , specifically by the Defendant , which caused tremendous emotional distress and damage to her mental health , ” according to the court documents filed by Meghan ’ s lawyers .
Meanwhile , Jeffrey Epstein ’ s sex trafficking partner and the daughter of an Israeli superspy , Ghislaine Maxwell has been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jeffrey Epstein ’ s high-profile clients maintained by his partner Ghislaine are contained in a Little Black Book which include Mike Bloomberg , Richard Branson , top US politicians , British Royals like Prince Charles , the Rothschilds , George Soros and the Queen of England herself .
It was reported that Ghislaine Maxwell sat on the Buckingham Palace throne during a private tour of the palace organised by Prince Andrew for former US president Bill Clinton .
A photo obtained by the Telegraph appears to show Ghislaine Maxwell reclining on the seat @ @ @ @ @ @ @

A new book on Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew by a royal author exposes how the Royal Family orchestrated Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s exit.
The couple announced their plans to depart from the Royal Family in January through an Instagram post. But biographer Nigel Cawthorne claims Prince Charles and Prince William leaked details of their plans for departure following Prince Andrew’s disastrous appearance on BBC Newsnight.
A new book on Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew exposes how the Royal Family orchestrated Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s exit
on Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew exposes how the Royal Family orchestrated Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s exit The claims are made in biographer Nigel Cawthorne new book Prince Andrew, Epstein and the Palace
The book investigates the story of the key players, allegations and counter-allegations in this unique, high-stakes royal drama
According to documents filed by Meghan’s legal team, she was “prohibited from defending herself” from vicious attacks in the press during her time as a senior working royal
Prince Charles and Prince William leaked details of their plans for departure following Prince Andrew’s disastrous appearance on BBC Newsnight
All of Jeffrey Epstein’s high-profile clients maintained by his partner Ghislaine Maxwell, now arrested by the FBI are contained in a Little Black Book
It was reported that Ghislaine sat on the Buckingham Palace throne during a private tour of the palace organised by Prince Andrew for former US president Bill Clinton
Speaking on the Royally Obsessed podcast, Roberta Fiorito, the Royal commentrator said:
“There’s a rumour going around that Prince Charles and/or Prince William were the ones to orchestrate the timing of Harry and Meghan’s exit, reported the Daily Express.
“Why on Earth would Harry’s dad want him to leave the family? I don’t think that’s possible.”
The claims are made in biographer Nigel Cawthorne new book Prince Andrew, Epstein and the Palace. The book investigates the story of the key players, allegations and counter-allegations in this unique, high-stakes royal drama.
It provides a gripping and uncommon insight into the privileges enjoyed by billionaires, global power brokers and royalty.
The background of this is biographer Nigel Cawthorne new book ‘Prince Andrew, Epstein and the Palace’, there are some pretty explosive claims to say Charles’ and William’s teams at the Palace decided to use the moment of Prince Andrew’s disastrous BBC Newsnight interview to start leaking stories that Harry and Meghan were about to depart their roles.”
“Those leaks, I guess, eventually sparked the crisis talks organised by the Queen. I don’t see why this is a rumour and I think Harry and Meghan made it clear it was their choice.”
According to documents filed by Meghan’s legal team, she was “prohibited from defending herself” from vicious attacks in the press during her time as a senior working royal.
“The Claimant had become the subject of a large number of false and damaging articles by the UK tabloid media, specifically by the Defendant, which caused tremendous emotional distress and damage to her mental health,” according to the court documents filed by Meghan’s lawyers.
Here is the painting of the former President of America Bill Clinton found inside pedophile kingpin and Israeli spy Jeffrey Epstein's house. pic.twitter.com/inBd2sAtur — GreatGameIndia (@GreatGameIndia) July 3, 2020
Meanwhile, Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking partner and the daughter of an Israeli superspy, Ghislaine Maxwell has been arrested by the FBI.
All of Jeffrey Epstein’s high-profile clients maintained by his partner Ghislaine are contained in a Little Black Book which include Mike Bloomberg, Richard Branson, top US politicians, British Royals like Prince Charles, the Rothschilds, George Soros and the Queen of England herself.
It was reported that Ghislaine Maxwell sat on the Buckingham Palace throne during a private tour of the palace organised by Prince Andrew for former US president Bill Clinton.
A photo obtained by the Telegraph appears to show Ghislaine Maxwell reclining on the seat beside actor Keven Spacey in 2002.
Source: Greatgameindia.com


humansarefree--2020-07-05--Michigan Passes Controversial Bill to Microchip Humans Voluntarily

The Michigan House of Representatives has passed a controversial bill to microchip humans voluntarily in the state under the guise of protecting their privacy .
The Microchip Protection Act would allow Michigan employers to use microchipping of their workers with their consent .
However , research has shown that RFID transponders causes cancer .
The plan to microchip humans is sponsored by Rep. Bronna Kahle under the guise of protecting the privacy of workers .
The stated objective of the bill is that it will protect the privacy rights of Michigan workers and promote further growth for job providers as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ technology on the rise that increases workplace efficiency .
“ With the way technology has increased over the years and as it continues to grow , it ’ s important Michigan job providers balance the interests of the company with their employees ’ expectations of privacy.
” “ Microchipping has been brought up in many conversations as companies across the country are exploring cost-effective ways to increase workplace efficiency .
While these miniature devices are on the rise , so are the calls of workers to have their privacy protected.
” – Rep. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the bill , said in a press statement .
Radio-frequency identification tags , commonly referred to as microchips , are beginning to seep into the marketplace as new technological devices to help streamline everyday business practices .
The chips , roughly the size of a grain of rice , are implanted into the hands of employees and act as a replacement for I.D .
badges , timecards , usernames and passwords for security clearance , and even credit cards .
“ Despite this type of technology not quite making its way into our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be surprised if it becomes a standard business practice statewide within the next few years , ” Kahle said .
“ We should absolutely take every step possible to get ahead of these devices.
” Under Kahle ’ s plan , Michigan employers would be able utilize microchipping , but could not mandate employees to have such devices implanted .
Kahle said the measure strikes a good balance between protecting workers ’ rights and providing businesses with flexibility to increase efficiency and further grow .
However , research has shown that RFID transponders @ @ @ @ @ @ @ percent of Americans are uncomfortable with microchipping mostly due to studies that suggested a link between RFID transponders and cancer in lab animals .
In May , the plan to chip humans globally through a digital ID was exposed in the Italian Parliament .
Also read : Apiject CEO Says Their Will Be At Least 100 Million Doses Ready To Inject Of A Chip Vaccine To The Public Sara Cunial , the Member of Parliament for Rome denounced Bill Gates as a “ vaccine criminal ” and urged the Italian President to hand @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for crimes against humanity .
She also exposed Bill Gates ’ agenda in India and Africa , along with the plans to chip the human race through the digital identification program ID2020 .

The Michigan House of Representatives has passed a controversial bill to microchip humans voluntarily in the state under the guise of protecting their privacy.
The Microchip Protection Act would allow Michigan employers to use microchipping of their workers with their consent. However, research has shown that RFID transponders causes cancer.
The plan to microchip humans is sponsored by Rep. Bronna Kahle under the guise of protecting the privacy of workers.
The stated objective of the bill is that it will protect the privacy rights of Michigan workers and promote further growth for job providers as it relates to microchipping – a cutting-edge technology on the rise that increases workplace efficiency.
“With the way technology has increased over the years and as it continues to grow, it’s important Michigan job providers balance the interests of the company with their employees’ expectations of privacy.”
“Microchipping has been brought up in many conversations as companies across the country are exploring cost-effective ways to increase workplace efficiency. While these miniature devices are on the rise, so are the calls of workers to have their privacy protected.” – Rep. Bronna Kahle, the Republican who sponsored the bill, said in a press statement.
Radio-frequency identification tags, commonly referred to as microchips, are beginning to seep into the marketplace as new technological devices to help streamline everyday business practices.
The chips, roughly the size of a grain of rice, are implanted into the hands of employees and act as a replacement for I.D. badges, timecards, usernames and passwords for security clearance, and even credit cards.
“Despite this type of technology not quite making its way into our state yet, I wouldn’t be surprised if it becomes a standard business practice statewide within the next few years,” Kahle said.
“We should absolutely take every step possible to get ahead of these devices.”
Under Kahle’s plan, Michigan employers would be able utilize microchipping, but could not mandate employees to have such devices implanted.
Kahle said the measure strikes a good balance between protecting workers’ rights and providing businesses with flexibility to increase efficiency and further grow.
However, research has shown that RFID transponders causes cancer. Research has suggested 90 percent of Americans are uncomfortable with microchipping mostly due to studies that suggested a link between RFID transponders and cancer in lab animals.
In May, the plan to chip humans globally through a digital ID was exposed in the Italian Parliament.
Also read: Apiject CEO Says Their Will Be At Least 100 Million Doses Ready To Inject Of A Chip Vaccine To The Public
Sara Cunial, the Member of Parliament for Rome denounced Billy Boy as a “jjab criminal” and urged the Italian President to hand him over to the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity.
She also exposed Billy Boy’ agenda in India and Africa, along with the plans to chip the human race through the digital identification program ID2020.
Source: Greatgameindia.com


humansarefree--2020-07-05--While the World Was Distracted, Hillary Clinton Lost Her Appeal and Will Testify About Her Private E

While the World Was Distracted, Hillary Clinton Lost Her Appeal and Will Testify About Her Private Email Server on Sept. 9

Just days after the George Floyd incident occurred , failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton lost her appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C .
Circuit , during which she tried , but failed , to avoid having to testify under oath about her emails and the Benghazi case .
But much of the world failed to notice because the mainstream media was too busy broadcasting all the riots and looting in response to “ racism.
” Judicial Watch , the same group that is now suing Anthony Fauci and the World Health Organization ( WHO ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pandemic , had filed a lawsuit against Clinton demanding that the State Department release documents and communication associated with the 2012 terror attack at the U.S. mission in Benghazi , Libya .
As many of our readers well know , U.S .
Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens , along with three other Americans , were killed in the attack .
Clinton was Secretary of State at the time , and has been accused of illegally using a private email server during her time in office .
Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act @ @ @ @ @ @ @ examine any potential misconduct in which she may have been engaged .
Some of Clinton ’ s private emails have been retrieved from her unsecured server , but evidence emerged to suggest that Clinton had “ tried to delete or destroy ” all of the most incriminating ones .
It was also revealed that Clinton had asked former United Kingdom prime minister Tony Blair to keep communicating with her via her private email server after her confirmation .
This earned Clinton the descriptor of being “ extremely careless ” in her handling of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ actually charged by the FBI under then-director James Comey .
Your crimes are finally catching up with you , Hillary Our readers probably know the rest of the story up until June 2 when Clinton ’ s lawyers challenged a March 2 order from U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth ordering her to testify .
This order stated : “ The Court is not confident that State currently possesses every Clinton email recovered by the FBI ; even years after the FBI investigation , the slow trickle of new emails has yet to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Court believes the subpoena would be worthwhile and may even uncover additional previously undisclosed emails .
Accordingly , the Court GRANTS this request , ” referring to the request from Judicial Watch .
It went on to indicate that Clinton would , in fact , be deposed on matters related to her use of a private email server , as well as her understanding of the State ’ s record management obligations .
While Clinton and her cohorts can not be questioned about any actions they took after the Benghazi attack , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ knowledge of the existence of any emails , documents , or text messages related to the Benghazi attack.
” When the time comes on September 9 , Clinton will have to answer for why she deleted 33,000 emails from her private email server , and what they contained .
Despite repeated claims that these emails were “ personal , ” the FBI has already recovered more than 17,000 of them that were , in fact , work-related .
Clinton will also have to answer for why senior Obama administration officials knowingly misled the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Benghazi attack .
“ Did they contain any classified information , ” Dr. Veronika Kyrylenko asks about Clinton ’ s emails , writing for American Thinker .
“ Did they contain human intel ?
“ Did [ Clinton ] know about the upcoming terrorist attack ?
What measures did she use to prevent the Benghazi attack ?
What measures did she use to save the American lives ?
” “ And now , despite all the effort to avoid testimony , Madam Secretary will have to answer questions from Judicial Watch , as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ submitted the case , which will now be heard on September 9 .
Stock up on your popcorn , America.
” Also read : List Of 71 Clinton Associates Who Died Mysteriously Or Committed Suicide Before Testimony

Just days after the George Floyd incident occurred, failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton lost her appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, during which she tried, but failed, to avoid having to testify under oath about her emails and the Benghazi case.
But much of the world failed to notice because the mainstream media was too busy broadcasting all the riots and looting in response to “racism.”
Judicial Watch, the same group that is now suing Anthony Fauci and the World Health Organization (WHO) over the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, had filed a lawsuit against Clinton demanding that the State Department release documents and communication associated with the 2012 terror attack at the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya.
As many of our readers well know, U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, along with three other Americans, were killed in the attack.
Clinton was Secretary of State at the time, and has been accused of illegally using a private email server during her time in office.
Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against Clinton to examine any potential misconduct in which she may have been engaged.
Some of Clinton’s private emails have been retrieved from her unsecured server, but evidence emerged to suggest that Clinton had “tried to delete or destroy” all of the most incriminating ones.
It was also revealed that Clinton had asked former United Kingdom prime minister Tony Blair to keep communicating with her via her private email server after her confirmation.
This earned Clinton the descriptor of being “extremely careless” in her handling of classified information, though she was never actually charged by the FBI under then-director James Comey.
Your crimes are finally catching up with you, Hillary
Our readers probably know the rest of the story up until June 2 when Clinton’s lawyers challenged a March 2 order from U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth ordering her to testify. This order stated:
“The Court is not confident that State currently possesses every Clinton email recovered by the FBI; even years after the FBI investigation, the slow trickle of new emails has yet to be explained.
“For this reason, the Court believes the subpoena would be worthwhile and may even uncover additional previously undisclosed emails. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS this request,” referring to the request from Judicial Watch.
It went on to indicate that Clinton would, in fact, be deposed on matters related to her use of a private email server, as well as her understanding of the State’s record management obligations.
While Clinton and her cohorts cannot be questioned about any actions they took after the Benghazi attack, they can be questioned “about their knowledge of the existence of any emails, documents, or text messages related to the Benghazi attack.”
When the time comes on September 9, Clinton will have to answer for why she deleted 33,000 emails from her private email server, and what they contained.
Despite repeated claims that these emails were “personal,” the FBI has already recovered more than 17,000 of them that were, in fact, work-related.
Clinton will also have to answer for why senior Obama administration officials knowingly misled the country about what actually happened during the Benghazi attack.
“Did they contain any classified information,” Dr. Veronika Kyrylenko asks about Clinton’s emails, writing for American Thinker. “Did they contain human intel?
“Did [Clinton] know about the upcoming terrorist attack? What measures did she use to prevent the Benghazi attack? What measures did she use to save the American lives?”
“And now, despite all the effort to avoid testimony, Madam Secretary will have to answer questions from Judicial Watch, as the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals submitted the case, which will now be heard on September 9. Stock up on your popcorn, America.”
Also read: List Of 71 Clinton Associates Who Died Mysteriously Or Committed Suicide Before Testimony
By Ethan Huff, Guest writer


humansarefree--2020-07-05--Californians Revolt After Democrats Cancel 4th of July Festivities – Light Up the Sky with Thousands

Californians Revolt After Democrats Cancel 4th of July Festivities – Light Up the Sky with Thousands of ‘Illegal’ Fireworks

Democrat tyrant Gavin Newsom and other officials shut down 4th of July festivities in California due to a ‘ surge @ @ @ @ @ closed down beaches , bars , restaurants and museums , but his winery , Plumpjack @ @ @ @ @ still open for business .
Californians revolted and celebrated anyway by lighting up the sky @ @ @ @ @ .
Aerial footage over Los Angeles was a sight to see .
There were fireworks @ @ @ @ @ !
Californians gave a collective middle finger to Newsom and other anti-American tyrants .
Fireworks @ @ @ @ @ as well .
Residents in San Diego County also launched their own fireworks after July @ @ @ @ @

Democrat tyrant Gavin Newsom and other officials shut down 4th of July festivities in California due to a ‘surge in Coronavirus cases.’
Newsom closed down beaches, bars, restaurants and museums, but his winery, Plumpjack Winery in Napa Valley is still open for business.
Californians revolted and celebrated anyway by lighting up the sky with thousands of illegal fireworks.
Aerial footage over Los Angeles was a sight to see.
There were fireworks being launched in every direction!
WATCH:
COMMUNIST CALIFORNIA: “No 4th of July. Celebrating America is now illegal. CALIFORNIANS: “🖕🏼🇺🇸” pic.twitter.com/7taEfRCGjH — Benny (@bennyjohnson) July 5, 2020
Californians gave a collective middle finger to Newsom and other anti-American tyrants.
WATCH:
Sky5 got a look at fireworks lighting up the skies for Fourth of July pic.twitter.com/nkFNUh4N8O — KTLA (@KTLA) July 5, 2020
Fireworks were launched in Orange County as well.
WATCH:
The civilians Orange County are putting in a more impressive firework display than the cities usually do. pic.twitter.com/4e8WB9iBYj — Grant Broggi (@GrantSSC) July 5, 2020
4th of July is NOT cancelled in Orange County. Happy Independence Day and God bless America! #4thofJuly2020 #GodBlessAmerica #HappyIndependenceDay2020 pic.twitter.com/VbFvc2MvoN — Nina (@nin_kiwigirl) July 5, 2020
Residents in San Diego County also launched their own fireworks after July 4 celebrations were cancelled.
Source: Thegatewaypundit.com


humansarefree--2020-07-05--The US Prosecutor Wants Prince Andrew To Speak With The FBI After Ghislaine Maxwell’s Arrest

What Happened : Jeffrey Epstein ’ s right hand person , Ghislaine Maxwell was recently arrested on charges connected to Jeffrey Epstein with regards to child sex trafficking and abuse .
Now , the acting U.S. attorney Audrey Strauss , said U.S. prosecutors would “ welcome Prince Andrew coming in to talk to us ” during a press conference announcing the charges against Maxwell on Thursday , as many media outlets are now reporting .
“ We would like to have the benefit of his statement , ” Strauss told reporters .
Virginia Roberts Giuffre , a survivor of Epstein @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Maxwell trafficked her to have sex with Prince Andrew three times when she was 17 in 2001 .
This isn ’ t the first time the Royal Family has been implicated in such activity .
A member of the Royal family was claimed to be part of a suspected pedophile ring under investigation by the police in the late 1980s , a former Metropolitan police officer has said .
The officer was told by a detective sergeant that the investigation into the ring , which was also claimed to include an MP @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reasons .
“ I was in a car with two other vice squad officers … The detective sergeant said he had just had a major child abuse investigation shut down by the CPS regarding a royal and an MP , ” he told the Sunday Mirror newspaper .
“ He did not mention names , but he said the CPS had said it was not in the public ’ s interest because it ‘ could destabilise national security ’ .
” In fact , there are many examples from many different countries within @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and not only sexual abuse of children , but physical abuse as well as the murder of them .
Multiple Royal Families have been implicated , as well as Vatican Personnel , high ranking global leaders , politicians and more .
This is not to say all are involved , but from the outside looking in , it seems a significant amount are .
If you want to dive deeper into the topic and see more examples , you can refer to this article I published a few months ago .
We have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rings like the one Epstein and Maxwell ran .
Her name is Anneke Lucas and you can watch her full testimony here on CETV .
You can also watch a recent documentary called Out of Shadows that explores this topic in detail on CETV as well .
If you want to read more about Epstein and Maxwell , you can do that HERE .
Why This Is Important Could Maxwell ’ s arrest bring down more high profile people ?
It could , and that ’ s why it ’ s important .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ see how far this goes and we would have the opportunity to ask ourselves why high profile people are involved , and why there is such a big cover up .
Further , we could explore why we support these people making major decisions for the human race with regards to political policy that governs all aspects of life , from health , to education and more .
If politicians ad high profile individuals are in fact involved in this , which survivors of their rings commonly claim , we are giving our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a state where they lack empathy and connection , and are capable to doing thigs the general public would never dream of doing to others .
This is why more people are starting to really explore this topic , because it changes how we go about giving our power to people like this .
Humanity is in a process of ‘ Breaking the Illusion ’ we have come to accept about our reality .
We have been living from a collective story that states we elect good people into government , and they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ categorically is not the case , and part of our collective awakening to creating solutions that can make our world thrive is waking up from this illusion we have chosen to accept .
People are beginning to learn en masse that high profile figures are involved in such acts like extreme occult rituals , sex trafficking and pedophilia , and they are beginning to wonder why .

What Happened: Jeffrey Epstein’s right hand person, Ghislaine Maxwell was recently arrested on charges connected to Jeffrey Epstein with regards to child sex trafficking and abuse.
Now, the acting U.S. attorney Audrey Strauss, said U.S. prosecutors would “welcome Prince Andrew coming in to talk to us” during a press conference announcing the charges against Maxwell on Thursday, as many media outlets are now reporting.
“We would like to have the benefit of his statement,” Strauss told reporters. Virginia Roberts Giuffre, a survivor of Epstein’s abuse, has claimed he and Maxwell trafficked her to have sex with Prince Andrew three times when she was 17 in 2001.
This isn’t the first time the Royal Family has been implicated in such activity. A member of the Royal family was claimed to be part of a suspected pedophile ring under investigation by the police in the late 1980s, a former Metropolitan police officer has said.
The officer was told by a detective sergeant that the investigation into the ring, which was also claimed to include an MP, was shut down for national security reasons.
“I was in a car with two other vice squad officers … The detective sergeant said he had just had a major child abuse investigation shut down by the CPS regarding a royal and an MP,” he told the Sunday Mirror newspaper.
“He did not mention names, but he said the CPS had said it was not in the public’s interest because it ‘could destabilise national security’.”
In fact, there are many examples from many different countries within Europe that correlate with elite level pedophilia and not only sexual abuse of children, but physical abuse as well as the murder of them.
Multiple Royal Families have been implicated, as well as Vatican Personnel, high ranking global leaders, politicians and more.
This is not to say all are involved, but from the outside looking in, it seems a significant amount are.
If you want to dive deeper into the topic and see more examples, you can refer to this article I published a few months ago.
We have also interviewed a survivor of elite pedophile rings like the one Epstein and Maxwell ran. Her name is Anneke Lucas and you can watch her full testimony here on CETV.
You can also watch a recent documentary called Out of Shadows that explores this topic in detail on CETV as well.

If you want to read more about Epstein and Maxwell, you can do that HERE.
Why This Is Important
Could Maxwell’s arrest bring down more high profile people? It could, and that’s why it’s important. With this, the collective would really see how far this goes and we would have the opportunity to ask ourselves why high profile people are involved, and why there is such a big cover up.
Further, we could explore why we support these people making major decisions for the human race with regards to political policy that governs all aspects of life, from health, to education and more.
If politicians ad high profile individuals are in fact involved in this, which survivors of their rings commonly claim, we are giving our power over to people who are in a state where they lack empathy and connection, and are capable to doing thigs the general public would never dream of doing to others.
This is why more people are starting to really explore this topic, because it changes how we go about giving our power to people like this.
The Takeaway
Humanity is in a process of ‘Breaking the Illusion’ we have come to accept about our reality. We have been living from a collective story that states we elect good people into government, and they act in our best interest.
This categorically is not the case, and part of our collective awakening to creating solutions that can make our world thrive is waking up from this illusion we have chosen to accept.
People are beginning to learn en masse that high profile figures are involved in such acts like extreme occult rituals, sex trafficking and pedophilia, and they are beginning to wonder why.
Reference: Collective-evolution.com


humansarefree--2020-07-05--ABC News Reported on Vaccines Containing Ingredients Derived from Aborted Babies

The cat is finally out of the bag that childhood vaccines are loaded with toxic chemicals , including the cellular byproducts and derivatives of aborted human babies .
But it took a lot of work to get to this point , and the mainstream media is still insistent that this horror is no big deal because vaccines “ save lives.
” It was a little over five years ago when ABC News reluctantly admitted that childhood vaccines are , in fact , made using aborted human fetal tissue .
But the fake news outlet cited certain religious leaders , including @ @ @ @ @ @ @ see nothing wrong with abortion-fueled vaccines , as a manipulation tactic to sway the general public into also supporting the mass genocide of the unborn .
In lamenting the fact that an increasing number of parents object to childhood vaccination , ABC News pointed to a statement made by the National Catholic Bioethics Center that basically contends that getting vaccines made from aborted babies is just fine because not getting vaccinated supposedly harms more lives than those ended through abortion .
“ We should always ask our physician whether the product he proposes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with abortion , ” the Center contends , noting , however , that “ one is morally free to use the vaccine regardless of its historical association with abortion.
” “ The reason is that the risk to public health , if one chooses not to vaccinate , outweighs the legitimate concern about the origins of the vaccine , ” the Center went on to state at the time .
“ This is especially important for parents , who have a moral objection to protect the life and health of their children and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ want unborn human fetuses injected into your body ?
This position by the Catholic Church is particularly noteworthy now that we have the Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) to deal with , the reason being that vaccines containing aborted human fetal tissue are once again being pushed by authorities – even though these vaccines do not even yet exist – as the “ final solution ” to this crisis .
With talk of these Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) vaccines possibly being “ mandatory , ” meaning a government goon might try to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it is once again of critical pertinence that the general public know what these vaccines , like most others , will more than likely contain once they are publicly released .
Besides the usual toxic adjuvants like mercury ( thimerosal ) and aluminum , Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) vaccines will almost certainly contain other added materials derived from aborted human babies , which would probably come as a surprise to millions of Americans who still have no idea how vaccines are made .
Relying on the opinion of some religious leader like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stated in 2003 that “ universal vaccination has resulted in a considerable fall in the incidence of congenital rubella , with a general incidence reduced to less than five cases per 100,000 livebirths , is unacceptable .
Americans , and especially religious Americans , must do their due diligence in thinking through this issue on their own to determine the ethical and moral implications of injecting murdered unborn children into their bodies .
After all , it is your body , your choice , as the leftists love to say .
Is it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not the government ’ s , no matter the perceived threat from some trumped-up pandemic ?
“ Everyone should have the right to choose according to what they find ethical , ” wrote one ABC News commenter at the time .
“ Some people don ’ t view the fetus as less than anyone else … If you don ’ t care , you don ’ t care .
But let those who do have the right to know the truth .
”

This is a very important interview between Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Dr. Theresa Deisher regarding the use of human fetal tissue to culture viruses for jjabs, because Dr. Deisher reveals that human DNA fragments are found in jjabs.
Most of the COVID jjabs being developed are using human fetal tissue to culture the coronavirus.
One of the more interesting questions Mr. Kennedy asked Dr. Deisher was why the manufacturers of jjabs switched from exclusively using animal tissue to culture viruses for jjabs, to start using aborted fetal tissue some years back.
Dr. Deisher’s reply was that the industry we getting a lot of pressure from the animal rights movement to stop using animals for experimentation.
Mr. Kennedy was shocked, and stated:
It’s kind of weird to think that the animal rights activists have more clout with the jjab companies than do the anti-abortion activists.
Dr. Deisher replied:
They do. And you know what’s really alarming is the lack of outcry over human babies born alive at five to six months old so that their hearts can be obtained beating. And they have to be beating to be used in the research that’s being done.
If the heart has stopped beating, it’s not useful. You cannot use it.
And so these babies are delivered alive, and their hearts cut out without anesthesia.
I wouldn’t do that to a mouse….
by Children’s Health Defense
On June 15th, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. interviewed the founder and president of Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute, Dr. Theresa Deisher, on the use of aborted fetal tissue in jjabs.
Mr. Kennedy and Dr. Deisher covered a wide range of topics including which jjabs contain human fetal tissue, what the existing research tells us in terms of health risks, and what alternatives might be used in place of human DNA in jjabs.
WHO Obliterated All Arguments For Vaccines Or Contact Tracing: Asymptomatic Carriers Don’t Spread COVID-19
Dr. Deisher is a genetic engineer with over 20 years experience in the pharmaceutical industry, from basic human biology through clinical trials.
Dr. Deisher obtained her Ph.D. in Molecular and Cellular Physiology from Stanford University and has spent over 20 years in commercial biotechnology.
Prior to founding AVM Biotechnology and Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute (SCPI), she worked with leading biotechnology companies, including Genentech, Repligen, ZymoGenetics, Immunex and Amgen.
Dr. Deisher is an inventor on 23 issued U.S. patents, and her discoveries have led to clinical trials of FGF18 for osteoarthritis and cartilage repair, and for Factor XIII for surgical bleeding.
Dr. Deisher was the first person to discover adult cardiac derived stem cells, and has been a champion of adult stem cell research, both professionally and privately, for two decades.
Dr. Deisher was a plaintiff in the U.S. federal lawsuit to prohibit use of federal tax payer dollars for embryo destructive research, which was instrumental in steering science towards adult stem cell research, which has led to 14 U.S. FDA approved adult stem cell products and the Washington Post Dec 2013 headline “Scientists Go Ethical in 2013.”
AVM Biotechnology is the marquee prolife biotech company worldwide, certifying that it does not use morally illicit material in any process. SCPI’s mission is to end human trafficking in biomedical research.
Members Of Brazil’s Parliament Broke Into Hospital That Claimed To Have 5,000 Infected & 200 Dead From COVID19 – The Hospital Was EMPTY
Reference: MedicalKidnap.com