humansarefree--2020-07-14--Coronavirus: It is NOT a ‘New Virus’ – ‘The Fairy Tale of No Immunity’

“ It was even more wrong to claim that the population would not already have some immunity against this virus.
” The immune response to the virus is stronger than everyone thought .
The original article was published in the Swiss magazine Weltwoche ( World Week ) on June 10th .
The author , Beda M Stadler is the former director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Bern , a biologist and professor emeritus .
Stadler is an important medical professional in Switzerland , he also likes to use provoking language , which should not deter you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This article is about Switzerland and it does not suggest that the situation is exactly the same globally .
I am advocating for local measures according to locale situations .
And I advocate for looking at real data rather than abstract models .
I also suggest to read to the end , because Stadler makes crucial points about testing for Sars-CoV-2 .
This is not an accusation , but a ruthless taking stock [ of the current situation ] .
I could slap myself , because I looked at Sars-CoV2- way too @ @ @ @ @ @ @ somewhat annoyed with many of my immunology colleagues who so far have left the discussion about Covid-19 to virologists and epidemiologists .
I feel it is time to criticise some of the main and completely wrong public statements about this virus .
Firstly , it was wrong to claim that this virus was novel .
Secondly , It was even more wrong to claim that the population would not already have some immunity against this virus .
Thirdly , it was the crowning of stupidity to claim that someone could have Covid-19 without @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pass the disease along without showing any symptoms whatsoever .
But let ’ s look at this one by one .
At the end of 2019 a coronavirus , which was considered novel , was detected in China .
When the gene sequence , i.e .
the blueprint of this virus , was identified and was given a similar name to the 2002 identified Sars , i.e .
Sars-CoV-2 , we should have already asked ourselves then how far [ this virus ] is related to other coronaviri , which can make human @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we discussed from which animal as part of a Chinese menu the virus might have sprung .
In the meantime , however , many more people believe the Chinese were so stupid as to release this virus upon themselves in their own country .
Now that we ’ re talking about developing a vaccine against the virus , we suddenly see studies which show that this so-called novel virus is very strongly related to Sars-1 as well as other beta-coronaviri which make us suffer every year in the form of a colds .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ sequence between the various coronaviri which can make people sick , [ scientists ] currently work on identifying a number of areas on the virus in the same way as human immune cells identify them .
This is no longer about the genetic relationship , but about how our immune system sees this virus , i.e .
which parts of other coronaviri could potentially be used in a vaccine .
So : Sars-Cov-2 isn ’ t all that new , but merely a seasonal cold virus that mutated and disappears in summer , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is what we ’ re observing globally right now .
Flu viri mutate significantly more , by the way , and nobody would ever claim that a new flu virus strain was completely novel .
Many veterinary doctors where therefore annoyed by this claim of novelty , as they have been vaccinating cats , dogs , pigs , and cows for years against coronaviri .
2 .
The fairy tale of no immunity From the World Health Organisation ( WHO ) to every Facebook-virologist , everyone claimed this virus was particularly dangerous , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , because it was a novel virus .
Even Anthony Fauci , the most important advisor to the Trump administration noted at the beginning at every public appearance that the danger of the virus lay in the fact that there was no immunity against it .
Tony [ Anthony Sauci ] and I often sat next to each other at immunology seminars at the National Institute of Health in Bethesda in the US , because we worked in related fields back then .
So for a while I was pretty uncritical of his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ colleague of mine .
The penny dropped only when I realised that the first commercially available antibody test [ for Sars-CoV-2 ] was put together from an old antibody test that was meant to detect Sars-1 .
This kind of test evaluates if there are antibodies in someone ’ s blood and if they came about through an early fight against the virus .
[ Scientists ] even extracted antibodies from a Lama that would detect Sars-1 , Sars-CoV-2 , and even the Mers virus .
It also became known that Sars-CoV-2 had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ China where Sars-1 had previously raged .
This is clear evidence urgently suggesting that our immune system considers Sars-1 and Sars-Cov-2 at least partially identical and that one virus could probably protect us from the other .
That ’ s when I realised that the entire world simply claimed that there was no immunity , but in reality , nobody had a test ready to prove such a statement .
That wasn ’ t science , but pure speculation based on a gut feeling that was then parroted by everyone .
To this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ antibody test that can describe all possible immunological situations , such as : if someone is immune , since when , what the neutralising antibodies are targeting and how many structures exist on other coronaviri that can equally lead to immunity .
In mid-April work was published by the group of Andreas Thiel at the Charité Berlin .
A paper with 30 authors , amongst them the virologist Christian Drosten .
It showed that in 34 % of people in Berlin who had never been in contact with the Sars-CoV-2 virus showed nonetheless @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a different kind of immune reaction , see below ) .
This means that our T-cells , i.e .
white blood cells , detect common structures appearing on Sars-CoV-2 and regular cold viri and therefore combat both of them .
A study by John P A Ioannidis of Stanford University — according to the Einstein Foundation in Berlin one of the world ’ s ten most cited scientists — showed that immunity against Sars-Cov-2 , measured in the form of antibodies , is much higher than previously thought .
Ioannidis is certainly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to swim against the stream ; nontheless he is now being criticised , because the antibody tests used were not extremely precise .
With that , his critics admit that they do not have such tests yet .
And besides , John P A Ioannidis is such a scientific heavy-weight that all German virologists combined area a light-weight in comparison .
Epidemiologist also fell for the myth that there was no immunity in the population .
They also didn ’ t want to believe that coronaviri were seasonal cold viri that would disappear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would have looked differently .
When the initial worst case scenarios didn ’ t come true anywhere , some now still cling to models predicting a second wave .
Let ’ s leave them their hopes — I ’ ve never seen a scientific branch that manoeuvred itself so much into the offside .
I have also not yet understood why epidemiologists were so much more interested in the number of deaths , rather than in the numbers that could be saved .
As an immunologist I trust a biological model , namely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has built a tried and tested , adaptive immune system .
At the end of February , driving home from the recording of [ a Swiss political TV debate show ] , I mentioned to Daniel Koch [ former head of the Swiss federal section “ Communicable Diseases ” of the Federal Office of Public Health ] that I suspected there was a general immunity in the population against Sars-Cov-2 .
He argued against my view .
I later defended him anyway , when he said that children were not a driving factor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He suspected that children didn ’ t have a receptor for the virus , which is of course nonsense .
Still , we had to admit that his observations were correct .
But the fact that every scientist attacked him afterwards and asked for studies to prove his point , was somewhat ironic .
Nobody asked for studies to prove that people in certain at-risk groups were dying .
When the first statistics from China and later worldwide data showed the same trend , that is to say that almost no children under @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should have made the argument that children clearly have to be immune .
For every other disease that doesn ’ t afflict a certain group of people , we would come to the conclusion that that group is immune .
When people are sadly dying in a retirement home , but in the same place other pensioners with the same risk factors are left entirely unharmed , we should also conclude that they were presumably immune .
But this common sense seems to have eluded many , let ’ s call them “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This new breed of deniers had to observe that the majority of people who tested positive for this virus , i.e .
the virus was present in their throats , did not get sick .
The term “ silent carriers ” was conjured out of a hat and it was claimed that one could be sick without having symptoms .
Wouldn ’ t that be something !
If this principle from now on gets naturalised into the realm of medicine , health insurers would really have a problem , but also teachers whose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disease to skip school , if at the end of the day one didn ’ t need symptoms anymore to be sick .
The next joke that some virologists shared was the claim that those who were sick without symptoms could still spread the virus to other people .
The “ healthy ” sick would have so much of the virus in their throats that a normal conversation between two people would be enough for the “ healthy one ” to infect the other healthy one .
At this point we have to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a virus is growing anywhere in the body , also in the throat , it means that human cells decease .
When [ human ] cells decease , the immune system is alerted immediately and an infection is caused .
One of five cardinal symptoms of an infection is pain .
It is understandable that those afflicted by Covid-19 might not remember that initial scratchy throat and then go on to claim that they didn ’ t have any symptoms just a few days ago .
But for doctors and virologists to twist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” sick people , which stokes panic and was often given as a reason for stricter lockdown measures , just shows how bad the joke really is .
At least the WHO didn ’ t accept the claim of asymptomatic infections and even challenges this claim on its website .
Here a succinct and brief summary , especially for the immunity deniers , of how humans are attacked by germs and how we react to them : If there are pathogenic viri in our environment , then all humans — whether immune or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
If someone is immune , the battle with the virus begins .
First we try to prevent the virus from binding to our own cells with the help of antibodies .
This normally works only partially , not all are blocked and some viri will attach to the appropriate cells .
That doesn ’ t need to lead to symptoms , but it ’ s also not a disease .
Because the second guard of the immune system is now called into action .
That ’ s the above mentioned T-cells , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the outside in which other cells the virus is now hiding to multiply .
These cells , which are now incubating the virus , are searched throughout the entire body and killed by the T-cells until the last virus is dead .
So if we do a PCR corona test on an immune person , it is not a virus that is detected , but a small shattered part of the viral genome .
The test comes back positive for as long as there are tiny shattered parts of the virus left @ @ @ @ @ @ @ viri are long dead , a corona test can come back positive , because the PCR method multiplies even a tiny fraction of the viral genetic material enough [ to be detected ] .
That ’ s exactly what happened , when there was the global news , even shared by the WHO , that 200 Koreans who already went through Covid-19 were infected a second time and that there was therefore probably no immunity against this virus .
The explanation of what really happened and an apology came only later , when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were perfectly healthy and only had a short battle with the virus .
The crux was that the virus debris registered with the overly sensitive test and therefore came back as “ positive ” .
It is likely that a large number of the daily reported infection numbers are purely due to viral debris .
The PCR test with its extreme sensitivity was initially perfect to find out where the virus could be .
But this test can not identify whether the virus is still alive , i.e .
still infectous .
Unfortunately @ @ @ @ @ @ @ equate the strength of a test result with viral load , i.e .
the amount of virus someone can breathe out .
Luckily , our day care centres stayed open nontheless .
Since German virologist missed that part , because , out of principle , they do not look at what other countries are doing , even if other countries ’ case numbers are falling more rapidly .
What does this all mean in real life ?
The extremely long incubation time of two to 14 days — and reports of 22 to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ immunologist .
As well as the claim that most patients would no longer secrete the virus after five days .
Both [ claims ] in turn actually lead to the conclusion that there is — sort of in the background — a base immunity that contorts the events , compared to an expected cycle [ of a viral infection ] — i.e .
leads to a long incubation period and quick immunity .
This immunity also seems to be the problem for patients with a sever course of the disease .
Our antibody @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our defence system , is reduced the older we get .
But also people with a bad diet or who are malnourished may have a weakened immune system , which is why this virus does not only reveal the medical problems of a country , but also social issues .
If an infected person does not have enough antibodies , i.e .
a weak immune response , the virus slowly spreads out across the entire body .
Now that there are not enough antibodies , there is only the second , supporting leg @ @ @ @ @ @ @ T-cells beginn to attack the virus-infested cells all over the body .
This can lead to an exaggerated immune response , basically to a massive slaughter ; this is called a Cytokine Storm .
Very rarely this can also happen in small children , in that case called Kawasaki Syndrome .
This very rare occurrence in children was also used in our country to stoke panic .
It ’ s interesting , however , that this syndrome is very easily cured .
The [ affected ] children get antibodies from healthy blood donors @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coronavirus colds .
This means that the hushed-up [ supposedly non-existent ] immunity in the population is in fact used therapeutically .
The virus is gone for now .
It will probably come back in winter , but it won ’ t be a second wave , but just a cold .
Those young and healthy people who currently walk around with a mask on their faces would be better off wearing a helmet instead , because the risk of something falling on their head is greater than that of getting a serious @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a significant rise in infections in 14 days [ after the Swiss relaxed the lockdown ] , we ’ d at least know that one of the measures was useful .
Other than that I recommend reading John P A Ioannidis ’ latest work in which he describes the global situation based on data on May 1st 2020 : People below 65 years old make up only 0.6 to 2.6 % of all fatal Covid cases .
To get on top of the pandemic , we need a strategy merely concentrating on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ If that ’ s the opinion of a top expert , a second lockdown is simply a no-go .
On our way back to normal , it would be good for us citizens if a few scaremongers apologised .
Such as doctors who wanted a triage of over 80 year old Covid patients in order to stop ventilating them .
Also media that kept showing alarmist videos of Italian hospitals to illustrate a situation that as such didn ’ t exist .
All politicians calling for “ testing , testing , testing ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ measures .
And the federal government for an app they ’ ll never get to work and will warn me if someone near me is positive , even if they ’ re not infectious .
In winter , when the flu and other colds make the rounds again , we can then go back to kissing each other a little less , and we should wash our hands even without a virus present .
And people who ’ ll get sick nonetheless can then don their masks to show others what they have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we still haven ’ t learned to protect our at-risk groups , we ’ ll have to wait for a vaccine that will hopefully also be effective in at-risk people .
The original article was published in the Swiss magazine Weltwoche ( World Week ) on June 10th , via GlobalResearch.ca .
The author , Dr. Beda M Stadler is the former director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Bern , a biologist and professor emeritus .

“It was even more wrong to claim that the population would not already have some immunity against this virus.” The immune response to the virus is stronger than everyone thought.
The original article was published in the Swiss magazine Weltwoche (World Week) on June 10th.
The author, Beda M Stadler is the former director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Bern, a biologist and professor emeritus. Stadler is an important medical professional in Switzerland, he also likes to use provoking language, which should not deter you from the extremely important points he makes.
This article is about Switzerland and it does not suggest that the situation is exactly the same globally.
I am advocating for local measures according to locale situations. And I advocate for looking at real data rather than abstract models. I also suggest to read to the end, because Stadler makes crucial points about testing for Sars-CoV-2.
This is not an accusation, but a ruthless taking stock [of the current situation]. I could slap myself, because I looked at Sars-CoV2- way too long with panic.
I am also somewhat annoyed with many of my immunology colleagues who so far have left the discussion about Covid-19 to virologists and epidemiologists.
I feel it is time to criticise some of the main and completely wrong public statements about this virus.
Firstly, it was wrong to claim that this virus was novel.
Secondly, It was even more wrong to claim that the population would not already have some immunity against this virus.
Thirdly, it was the crowning of stupidity to claim that someone could have Covid-19 without any symptoms at all or even to pass the disease along without showing any symptoms whatsoever.
But let’s look at this one by one.
1. A new virus?
At the end of 2019 a coronavirus, which was considered novel, was detected in China.
When the gene sequence, i.e. the blueprint of this virus, was identified and was given a similar name to the 2002 identified Sars, i.e. Sars-CoV-2, we should have already asked ourselves then how far [this virus] is related to other coronaviri, which can make human beings sick.
But no, instead we discussed from which animal as part of a Chinese menu the virus might have sprung.
In the meantime, however, many more people believe the Chinese were so stupid as to release this virus upon themselves in their own country.
Now that we’re talking about developing a jjab against the virus, we suddenly see studies which show that this so-called novel virus is very strongly related to Sars-1 as well as other beta-coronaviri which make us suffer every year in the form of a colds.
Apart from the pure homologies in the sequence between the various coronaviri which can make people sick, [scientists] currently work on identifying a number of areas on the virus in the same way as human immune cells identify them.
This is no longer about the genetic relationship, but about how our immune system sees this virus, i.e. which parts of other coronaviri could potentially be used in a jjab.
So: Sars-Cov-2 isn’t all that new, but merely a seasonal cold virus that mutated and disappears in summer, as all cold viri do — which is what we’re observing globally right now.
Flu viri mutate significantly more, by the way, and nobody would ever claim that a new flu virus strain was completely novel.
Many veterinary doctors where therefore annoyed by this claim of novelty, as they have been jjabing cats, dogs, pigs, and cows for years against coronaviri.
2. The fairy tale of no immunity
From the World Health Organisation (WHO) to every Facebook-virologist, everyone claimed this virus was particularly dangerous, because there was no immunity against it, because it was a novel virus.
Even Anthony Fauci, the most important advisor to the Trump administration noted at the beginning at every public appearance that the danger of the virus lay in the fact that there was no immunity against it.
Tony [Anthony Sauci] and I often sat next to each other at immunology seminars at the National Institute of Health in Bethesda in the US, because we worked in related fields back then. So for a while I was pretty uncritical of his statements, since he was a respectable colleague of mine.
The penny dropped only when I realised that the first commercially available antibody test [for Sars-CoV-2] was put together from an old antibody test that was meant to detect Sars-1.
This kind of test evaluates if there are antibodies in someone’s blood and if they came about through an early fight against the virus.
[Scientists] even extracted antibodies from a Lama that would detect Sars-1, Sars-CoV-2, and even the Mers virus. It also became known that Sars-CoV-2 had a less significant impact in areas in China where Sars-1 had previously raged.
This is clear evidence urgently suggesting that our immune system considers Sars-1 and Sars-Cov-2 at least partially identical and that one virus could probably protect us from the other.
That’s when I realised that the entire world simply claimed that there was no immunity, but in reality, nobody had a test ready to prove such a statement.
That wasn’t science, but pure speculation based on a gut feeling that was then parroted by everyone.
To this day there isn’t a single antibody test that can describe all possible immunological situations, such as: if someone is immune, since when, what the neutralising antibodies are targeting and how many structures exist on other coronaviri that can equally lead to immunity.
In mid-April work was published by the group of Andreas Thiel at the Charité Berlin. A paper with 30 authors, amongst them the virologist Christian Drosten.
It showed that in 34 % of people in Berlin who had never been in contact with the Sars-CoV-2 virus showed nonetheless T-cell immunity against it (T-cell immunity is a different kind of immune reaction, see below).
This means that our T-cells, i.e. white blood cells, detect common structures appearing on Sars-CoV-2 and regular cold viri and therefore combat both of them.
A study by John P A Ioannidis of Stanford University — according to the Einstein Foundation in Berlin one of the world’s ten most cited scientists — showed that immunity against Sars-Cov-2, measured in the form of antibodies, is much higher than previously thought.
Ioannidis is certainly not a conspiracy theorist who just wants to swim against the stream; nontheless he is now being criticised, because the antibody tests used were not extremely precise.
With that, his critics admit that they do not have such tests yet. And besides, John P A Ioannidis is such a scientific heavy-weight that all German virologists combined area a light-weight in comparison.
3. The failure of modellers
Epidemiologist also fell for the myth that there was no immunity in the population. They also didn’t want to believe that coronaviri were seasonal cold viri that would disappear in summer.
Otherwise their curve models would have looked differently. When the initial worst case scenarios didn’t come true anywhere, some now still cling to models predicting a second wave.
Let’s leave them their hopes — I’ve never seen a scientific branch that manoeuvred itself so much into the offside. I have also not yet understood why epidemiologists were so much more interested in the number of deaths, rather than in the numbers that could be saved.
4. Immunology of common sense
As an immunologist I trust a biological model, namely that of the human organism, which has built a tried and tested, adaptive immune system.
At the end of February, driving home from the recording of [a Swiss political TV debate show], I mentioned to Daniel Koch [former head of the Swiss federal section “Communicable Diseases” of the Federal Office of Public Health] that I suspected there was a general immunity in the population against Sars-Cov-2. He argued against my view.
I later defended him anyway, when he said that children were not a driving factor in the spread of the pandemic. He suspected that children didn’t have a receptor for the virus, which is of course nonsense.
Still, we had to admit that his observations were correct. But the fact that every scientist attacked him afterwards and asked for studies to prove his point, was somewhat ironic.
Nobody asked for studies to prove that people in certain at-risk groups were dying. When the first statistics from China and later worldwide data showed the same trend, that is to say that almost no children under ten years old got sick, everyone should have made the argument that children clearly have to be immune.
For every other disease that doesn’t afflict a certain group of people, we would come to the conclusion that that group is immune.
When people are sadly dying in a retirement home, but in the same place other pensioners with the same risk factors are left entirely unharmed, we should also conclude that they were presumably immune.
But this common sense seems to have eluded many, let’s call them “immunity deniers” just for fun. This new breed of deniers had to observe that the majority of people who tested positive for this virus, i.e. the virus was present in their throats, did not get sick.
The term “silent carriers” was conjured out of a hat and it was claimed that one could be sick without having symptoms. Wouldn’t that be something!
If this principle from now on gets naturalised into the realm of medicine, health insurers would really have a problem, but also teachers whose students could now claim to have whatever disease to skip school, if at the end of the day one didn’t need symptoms anymore to be sick.
The next joke that some virologists shared was the claim that those who were sick without symptoms could still spread the virus to other people.
The “healthy” sick would have so much of the virus in their throats that a normal conversation between two people would be enough for the “healthy one” to infect the other healthy one.
At this point we have to dissect what is happening here: If a virus is growing anywhere in the body, also in the throat, it means that human cells decease.
When [human] cells decease, the immune system is alerted immediately and an infection is caused. One of five cardinal symptoms of an infection is pain.
It is understandable that those afflicted by Covid-19 might not remember that initial scratchy throat and then go on to claim that they didn’t have any symptoms just a few days ago.
But for doctors and virologists to twist this into a story of “healthy” sick people, which stokes panic and was often given as a reason for stricter lockdown measures, just shows how bad the joke really is.
At least the WHO didn’t accept the claim of asymptomatic infections and even challenges this claim on its website.
Here a succinct and brief summary, especially for the immunity deniers, of how humans are attacked by germs and how we react to them:
If there are pathogenic viri in our environment, then all humans — whether immune or not — are attacked by this virus. If someone is immune, the battle with the virus begins.
First we try to prevent the virus from binding to our own cells with the help of antibodies. This normally works only partially, not all are blocked and some viri will attach to the appropriate cells.
That doesn’t need to lead to symptoms, but it’s also not a disease. Because the second guard of the immune system is now called into action.
That’s the above mentioned T-cells, white blood cells, which can determine from the outside in which other cells the virus is now hiding to multiply.
These cells, which are now incubating the virus, are searched throughout the entire body and killed by the T-cells until the last virus is dead.
So if we do a PCR corona test on an immune person, it is not a virus that is detected, but a small shattered part of the viral genome. The test comes back positive for as long as there are tiny shattered parts of the virus left.
Correct: Even if the infectious viri are long dead, a corona test can come back positive, because the PCR method multiplies even a tiny fraction of the viral genetic material enough [to be detected].
That’s exactly what happened, when there was the global news, even shared by the WHO, that 200 Koreans who already went through Covid-19 were infected a second time and that there was therefore probably no immunity against this virus.
The explanation of what really happened and an apology came only later, when it was clear that the immune Koreans were perfectly healthy and only had a short battle with the virus.
The crux was that the virus debris registered with the overly sensitive test and therefore came back as “positive”. It is likely that a large number of the daily reported infection numbers are purely due to viral debris.
The PCR test with its extreme sensitivity was initially perfect to find out where the virus could be. But this test can not identify whether the virus is still alive, i.e. still infectous.
Unfortunately, this also led some virologists to equate the strength of a test result with viral load, i.e. the amount of virus someone can breathe out. Luckily, our day care centres stayed open nontheless.
Since German virologist missed that part, because, out of principle, they do not look at what other countries are doing, even if other countries’ case numbers are falling more rapidly.
5. The problem with corona immunity
What does this all mean in real life? The extremely long incubation time of two to 14 days — and reports of 22 to 27 days — should wake up any immunologist. As well as the claim that most patients would no longer secrete the virus after five days.
Both [claims] in turn actually lead to the conclusion that there is — sort of in the background — a base immunity that contorts the events, compared to an expected cycle [of a viral infection] — i.e. leads to a long incubation period and quick immunity.
This immunity also seems to be the problem for patients with a sever course of the disease. Our antibody titre, i.e. the accuracy of our defence system, is reduced the older we get.
But also people with a bad diet or who are malnourished may have a weakened immune system, which is why this virus does not only reveal the medical problems of a country, but also social issues.
If an infected person does not have enough antibodies, i.e. a weak immune response, the virus slowly spreads out across the entire body.
Now that there are not enough antibodies, there is only the second, supporting leg of our immune response left:
The T-cells beginn to attack the virus-infested cells all over the body. This can lead to an exaggerated immune response, basically to a massive slaughter; this is called a Cytokine Storm.
Very rarely this can also happen in small children, in that case called Kawasaki Syndrome. This very rare occurrence in children was also used in our country to stoke panic.
It’s interesting, however, that this syndrome is very easily cured. The [affected] children get antibodies from healthy blood donors, i.e. people who went through coronavirus colds.
This means that the hushed-up [supposedly non-existent] immunity in the population is in fact used therapeutically.
What now?
The virus is gone for now. It will probably come back in winter, but it won’t be a second wave, but just a cold.
Those young and healthy people who currently walk around with a mask on their faces would be better off wearing a helmet instead, because the risk of something falling on their head is greater than that of getting a serious case of Covid-19.
If we observe a significant rise in infections in 14 days [after the Swiss relaxed the lockdown], we’d at least know that one of the measures was useful.
Other than that I recommend reading John P A Ioannidis’ latest work in which he describes the global situation based on data on May 1st 2020: People below 65 years old make up only 0.6 to 2.6 % of all fatal Covid cases.
To get on top of the pandemic, we need a strategy merely concentrating on the protection of at-risk people over 65. If that’s the opinion of a top expert, a second lockdown is simply a no-go.
On our way back to normal, it would be good for us citizens if a few scaremongers apologised. Such as doctors who wanted a triage of over 80 year old Covid patients in order to stop ventilating them.
Also media that kept showing alarmist videos of Italian hospitals to illustrate a situation that as such didn’t exist.
All politicians calling for “testing, testing, testing” without even knowing what the test actually measures.
And the federal government for an app they’ll never get to work and will warn me if someone near me is positive, even if they’re not infectious.
In winter, when the flu and other colds make the rounds again, we can then go back to kissing each other a little less, and we should wash our hands even without a virus present.
And people who’ll get sick nonetheless can then don their masks to show others what they have learned from this pandemic.
And if we still haven’t learned to protect our at-risk groups, we’ll have to wait for a jjab that will hopefully also be effective in at-risk people.
The original article was published in the Swiss magazine Weltwoche (World Week) on June 10th, via GlobalResearch.ca. The author, Dr. Beda M Stadler is the former director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Bern, a biologist and professor emeritus.


humansarefree--2020-07-14--Climate Cult Insanity: Prison and Fines for Those Who Contradict Official Global Warming Narrative

If you dare to point out the flaws in the notion of global warming , some climate activists would like to see you sent to prison , or at least fined .
In an article penned by a group of professors from the University of Exeter that appeared in Carbon Brief , the authors call for those who publish what they deem “ climate misinformation ” online to be fined and imprisoned .
They claim that pointing out science that contradicts their narrative causes significant harm .
They opened their guest post entitled , “ How climate change misinformation spreads @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as other topics that are “ laced with misleading information ” before singling out climate change as the topic most subject the “ organized spread of spurious information.
” Although there is misinformation on both sides of the debate , the authors predictably chose to focus on climate skepticism .
They claim there are various groups of actors who are responsible for the funding , creation and spread of this so-called misinformation , including the fossil fuel industry , “ contrarian ” scientists , religious and political groups , and online groups using @ @ @ @ @ @ @ put forth a number of solutions that could help combat the problem of people contradicting the global warming narrative .
For example , they mention “ pre-emptively providing correct information ” and “ explicitly warning people they may be misinformed.
” They also suggest using algorithms for ranking and selection to reduce the “ misinformation ” that is circulating – something that we know all too well is already going on .
All of those ideas are concerning , of course , but the idea they put forth of an approach involving punishments @ @ @ @ @ @ @ outrageous of all .
Apparently , our right to free speech goes out the window when exercising that right involves exposing climate alarmists for the frauds they really are .
They conclude by saying that a combination of approaches is necessary for avoiding the disruption caused by misinformation to public debate .
Of course , what they claim is “ misleading information that is created and spread with intent to deceive ” is just verifiable information based on proven science that they don ’ t want people to hear , or “ inconvenient @ @ @ @ @ @ @ As meteorologist Anthony Watts points out , the radical idea of imprisoning people is the result of a group desperate to hold onto its credibility in a world where social media can quickly expose lies like those in Al Gore ’ s film , An Inconvenient Truth .
The film used an animated clip showing a polar bear nearly drowning while trying to make its way onto a small flow of ice that we ’ re led to conclude was caused by global warming .
He then cited a study about drowned polar @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by experts , and many people took to social media to try to spread the word of the inaccuracies .
It was eventually revealed that scientists had only documented a single polar bear drowned at sea following an intense storm .
An AP article later reported : “ A federal wildlife biologist whose observation in 2004 of presumably drowned polar bears in the Arctic helped to galvanize the global warming movement has been placed on administrative leave and is being investigated for scientific misconduct , possibly over the veracity of that article.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Video Ever — Polar Bear ‘ Starving From Climate Change ’ — Was Fake News • Climate Alarmists Drop The Polar Bear As Their Mascot Since Polar Bears Are Thriving This is just one of many claims in the film that have since been debunked , such as the one about Mount Kilimanjaro losing its ice cap because of global warming when deforestation around the mountain base ended up being the true culprit .
And let ’ s not forget that the Arctic ice cap that Gore claimed in 2009 would be gone @ @ @ @ @ @ @ intact .
Of course , in this scenario , it would be those who dared to point out the falsehoods in An Inconvenient Truth who deserve punishment , according to the authors , rather than those who told the lies in the first place .

If you dare to point out the flaws in the notion of global warming, some climate activists would like to see you sent to prison, or at least fined.
by Isabelle Z.
In an article penned by a group of professors from the University of Exeter that appeared in Carbon Brief, the authors call for those who publish what they deem “climate misinformation” online to be fined and imprisoned.
They claim that pointing out science that contradicts their narrative causes significant harm.
Their solution? More censorship
They opened their guest post entitled, “How climate change misinformation spreads online” by identifying jjabs and coronavirus as other topics that are “laced with misleading information” before singling out climate change as the topic most subject the “organized spread of spurious information.”
Although there is misinformation on both sides of the debate, the authors predictably chose to focus on climate skepticism.
They claim there are various groups of actors who are responsible for the funding, creation and spread of this so-called misinformation, including the fossil fuel industry, “contrarian” scientists, religious and political groups, and online groups using the cover of grassroots organizations.
They put forth a number of solutions that could help combat the problem of people contradicting the global warming narrative.
For example, they mention “pre-emptively providing correct information” and “explicitly warning people they may be misinformed.”
They also suggest using algorithms for ranking and selection to reduce the “misinformation” that is circulating – something that we know all too well is already going on.
All of those ideas are concerning, of course, but the idea they put forth of an approach involving punishments like fines or imprisonment is the most outrageous of all.
Apparently, our right to free speech goes out the window when exercising that right involves exposing climate alarmists for the frauds they really are.
They conclude by saying that a combination of approaches is necessary for avoiding the disruption caused by misinformation to public debate.
An inconvenient truth
Of course, what they claim is “misleading information that is created and spread with intent to deceive” is just verifiable information based on proven science that they don’t want people to hear, or “inconvenient truths,” if you will.
As meteorologist Anthony Watts points out, the radical idea of imprisoning people is the result of a group desperate to hold onto its credibility in a world where social media can quickly expose lies like those in Al Gore’s film, An Inconvenient Truth.
The film used an animated clip showing a polar bear nearly drowning while trying to make its way onto a small flow of ice that we’re led to conclude was caused by global warming. He then cited a study about drowned polar bears.
The claim was quickly disputed by experts, and many people took to social media to try to spread the word of the inaccuracies. It was eventually revealed that scientists had only documented a single polar bear drowned at sea following an intense storm.
An AP article later reported: “A federal wildlife biologist whose observation in 2004 of presumably drowned polar bears in the Arctic helped to galvanize the global warming movement has been placed on administrative leave and is being investigated for scientific misconduct, possibly over the veracity of that article.”
Related:
This is just one of many claims in the film that have since been debunked, such as the one about Mount Kilimanjaro losing its ice cap because of global warming when deforestation around the mountain base ended up being the true culprit.
And let’s not forget that the Arctic ice cap that Gore claimed in 2009 would be gone within five years is still very much intact.
Al Gore’s 10 Global Warming Predictions, 14 Years Later — None Happened!
Of course, in this scenario, it would be those who dared to point out the falsehoods in An Inconvenient Truth who deserve punishment, according to the authors, rather than those who told the lies in the first place.


humansarefree--2020-07-14--The ‘Great Reset’ Is Targeting Our Children

As we find ourselves in this new normal , we have seen longstanding agendas , which have remained behind the scenes , hidden away from the public , now being offered as solutions justified by this crisis .
The World Economic Forum ’ s “ Great Reset ” and the “ 4th Industrial Revolution ” are perfect examples of prepackaged “ solutions ” being rolled out to save us from ourselves .
Today we will dive deeper into this agenda and also focus on how it may reshape our lives if the technocrats have their way .
In this episode @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , an Adjunct Professor , researcher , contributor to Activist Post as well as several other alternative news sites , and the author of the book School World Order : The Technocratic Globalization of Corporatized Education .
For generations the social engineers have used the strategy of indoctrination to target society ’ s most impressionable minds , our children , through many avenues but primarily through our education systems .
In this interview , Spiro and John Klyczek break down how this longstanding and effective tactic is being “ reimagined ” by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of humanity .

As we find ourselves in this new normal, we have seen longstanding agendas, which have remained behind the scenes, hidden away from the public, now being offered as solutions justified by this crisis.
The World Economic Forum’s “Great Reset” and the “4th Industrial Revolution” are perfect examples of prepackaged “solutions” being rolled out to save us from ourselves.
Today we will dive deeper into this agenda and also focus on how it may reshape our lives if the technocrats have their way.
In this episode, Spiro is joined by John Klyczek, an Adjunct Professor, researcher, contributor to Activist Post as well as several other alternative news sites, and the author of the book School World Order: The Technocratic Globalization of Corporatized Education.
For generations the social engineers have used the strategy of indoctrination to target society’s most impressionable minds, our children, through many avenues but primarily through our education systems.
In this interview, Spiro and John Klyczek break down how this longstanding and effective tactic is being “reimagined” by the usual suspects, to reshape the future of humanity.
By Spiro Skouras, Guest writer


humansarefree--2020-07-14--Atlanta Armed ‘Black Panther’ Marchers Were Actors Dressed in Costumes

They said they were Black Panthers , and they looked the part with all-black attire and black berets adorned with a cat-head patch .
Their leader was a tall , thin black woman armed with an assault rifle and a determined look .
Photos of the group popped up in local news outlets , including The Atlanta Journal-Constitution , but also in the British tabloid press .
“ Armed female Black Panther leads her comrades including a white recruit on a march through Georgia , ” The Daily Mail wrote in an online story about the June 3 demonstration Decatur @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and embedded Instagram posts .
It is easy to see why the group attracted attention .
In a moment of fury over police shootings of black people , the group was perfectly cast .
Maybe too perfect .
Within a few days , an activist on Twitter sussed out that the group was comprised of models and actors from Atlanta ’ s film and entertainment industries .
A Twitter user who goes by Wolf The Red identified them from their Instagram accounts where he found the group modeling haute couture or publicizing their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ demonstrations .
No posts with guns .
No calls to action.
” A group of Atlanta-area models and actors dressed as Black Panthers pose for a photo on the Decatur Square after a march and rally Wednesday afternoon , June 3 , 2020 .
Members of the group say their intent was genuine , even if the outfits weren ’ t .
The AJC reached out to members of the group , including Whitney Oni , the striking woman who drew so much attention .
Oni , an Atlanta-based graphic designer and model @ @ @ @ @ @ @ her first time taking to the streets .
“ I started back with the Trayvon Martin case , ” she said , referring to the 2012 shooting death of the Florida teenager by a neighborhood watch coordinator in a gated community .
After the death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police officers last month , Oni said she believed it was “ important to use my voice.
” And to dress the part .
“ The outfits ?
We just pulled inspiration from ( the Black Panthers ) , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ black and leather — pleather .
Some of us are vegans , vegetarians.
” – Chris Joyner in Dressed the part , ‘ Panther ’ group came straight from central casting

They said they were Black Panthers, and they looked the part with all-black attire and black berets adorned with a cat-head patch.
Their leader was a tall, thin black woman armed with an assault rifle and a determined look. Photos of the group popped up in local news outlets, including The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, but also in the British tabloid press.
“Armed female Black Panther leads her comrades including a white recruit on a march through Georgia,” The Daily Mail wrote in an online story about the June 3 demonstration Decatur.
The story featured several dramatic photos and embedded Instagram posts.
It is easy to see why the group attracted attention. In a moment of fury over police shootings of black people, the group was perfectly cast. Maybe too perfect.
Within a few days, an activist on Twitter sussed out that the group was comprised of models and actors from Atlanta’s film and entertainment industries.
A Twitter user who goes by Wolf The Red identified them from their Instagram accounts where he found the group modeling haute couture or publicizing their film credits, but “zero prior demonstrations. No posts with guns. No calls to action.”
I finally had a break through with some help when I found the white dudes Instagram. I was able to track down a handful of them through him and came to a hilariously depressing conclusion. https://t.co/0255xGv93whttps://t.co/KVk468aYsUhttps://t.co/qjOX8gIsFK pic.twitter.com/Gc52dNXoCq — 🛡Wolf The Red🗡✊🏿 (@WolfTheRed) June 9, 2020
A group of Atlanta-area models and actors dressed as Black Panthers pose for a photo on the Decatur Square after a march and rally Wednesday afternoon, June 3, 2020.
Members of the group say their intent was genuine, even if the outfits weren’t.
The AJC reached out to members of the group, including Whitney Oni, the striking woman who drew so much attention.
Oni, an Atlanta-based graphic designer and model, said the recent protests were not her first time taking to the streets.
“I started back with the Trayvon Martin case,” she said, referring to the 2012 shooting death of the Florida teenager by a neighborhood watch coordinator in a gated community.
After the death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police officers last month, Oni said she believed it was “important to use my voice.”
And to dress the part.
“The outfits? We just pulled inspiration from (the Black Panthers),” she said.
“It was mostly black and leather — pleather. Some of us are vegans, vegetarians.” – Chris Joyner in Dressed the part, ‘Panther’ group came straight from central casting
Source: Thetruthaboutguns.com


humansarefree--2020-07-14--Pro-pedophilia Messages Embedded in Hollywood Movies for KIDS

The new children ’ s film “ Show Dogs ” has officially been pulled from theaters after parents everywhere sounded the alarm about its grossly pro-pedophilia plot line .
It all started when Terina Maldonado of the popular “ Macaroni Kid ” blog published a blog article about the movie ’ s shocking and highly inappropriate content .
According to Maldonado ’ s review of the film , which she saw with her family at an advanced screening , it basically centers around a talking police dog named Max and his human partner , Frank , who are tasked with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prestigious dog show .
The dog apparently uses his “ street smarts ” to outperform his competition , engaging in slap-stick and other comedic gags along the way .
Like many children ’ s films with animated characters , each is played by a popular Hollywood voice that the audience is sure to recognize , including names like Ludacris the rapper and popular actor Will Arnett .
There are also plenty of cute , fluffy dogs for viewers to look at while they journey along through the world of show dogs .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it comes time for Max to face his biggest challenge in the film : having his private parts inspected as part of the competitive process .
Unlike the other dogs , Max has never had to endure any sort of groping , despite being “ a tough dog from New York , ” so naturally his partner Frank has to ease him into the process .
This is where the film “ Show Dogs ” takes what Maldonado describes “ a dark and disturbing ” turn for the worse .
After repeatedly resisting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Max finally reaches the day where he has no choice but to let the judge touch him in order to win the competition , so he reluctantly agrees .
“ The judge ’ s hands slowly reach behind Max and he goes to his ‘ zen place , ’ ” writes Maldonado about perhaps the most disturbing scene in the film .
“ He ’ s flying through the sky , dancing with his partner , there are fireworks and flowers – everything is great – all while someone is touching his private @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to go with your children ’ s movies The deeply disturbing message being conveyed here – and to children , no less – is that , in order to achieve what you want in life , sometimes you have to let other people do things to you that are uncomfortable and invasive .
In this case , allowing someone to touch your private parts could be a necessary requirement in order to “ win ” a competition .
This is how many actors and actresses make it in Hollywood , after all – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It ’ s actually been suggested that rape and pedophilia are obligatory “ rites of passage ” for many young stars and starlets to make it in the ‘ biz , which is exactly what “ Show Dogs ” seems to be suggesting – using cute , fluffy animals , of course .
Since children have a natural inclination to not let people touch their private parts , films like “ Show Dogs ” seem to be trying to warm them up to the idea by making the characters animals and throwing in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Maldonado ’ s daughter apparently thought after seeing the scene , describing it as “ her favorite part of the movie ” because of the “ funny reaction he had.
” The Hollywood perverts who came up with the idea likely intended for children viewing the film to have this exact reaction .
Had it been actual children on-screen and some creep like Harvey Weinstein depicted trying to grab them , well , it wouldn ’ t have been funny at all , for one .
Second , it wouldn ’ t have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for viewing , especially by children .
So instead , Hollywood resorts to embedding its perversions into happy and hilarious cartoon characters that most people won ’ t even realize were created to brainwash them .
“ Disturbingly , these are similar tactics child abusers use when grooming children – telling them to pretend they are somewhere else and that they will get a reward for withstanding their discomfort , ” says Karen Hawkins from the National Center on Sexual Exploitation ( NCOSE ) about the film .
“ Children ’ s movies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and must teach children bodily autonomy , the ability to say ‘ no ’ and safety , not confusing messages endorsing unwanted genital touching .
”

The new children’s film “Show Dogs” has officially been pulled from theaters after parents everywhere sounded the alarm about its grossly pro-pedophilia plot line.
It all started when Terina Maldonado of the popular “Macaroni Kid” blog published a blog article about the movie’s shocking and highly inappropriate content.
According to Maldonado’s review of the film, which she saw with her family at an advanced screening, it basically centers around a talking police dog named Max and his human partner, Frank, who are tasked with rescuing a kidnapped baby panda from a prestigious dog show.
The dog apparently uses his “street smarts” to outperform his competition, engaging in slap-stick and other comedic gags along the way.
Like many children’s films with animated characters, each is played by a popular Hollywood voice that the audience is sure to recognize, including names like Ludacris the rapper and popular actor Will Arnett.
There are also plenty of cute, fluffy dogs for viewers to look at while they journey along through the world of show dogs.
It’s all fun and games until it comes time for Max to face his biggest challenge in the film: having his private parts inspected as part of the competitive process.
Unlike the other dogs, Max has never had to endure any sort of groping, despite being “a tough dog from New York,” so naturally his partner Frank has to ease him into the process.
This is where the film “Show Dogs” takes what Maldonado describes “a dark and disturbing” turn for the worse.
After repeatedly resisting Frank’s advances early on, Max finally reaches the day where he has no choice but to let the judge touch him in order to win the competition, so he reluctantly agrees.
“The judge’s hands slowly reach behind Max and he goes to his ‘zen place,’” writes Maldonado about perhaps the most disturbing scene in the film.
“He’s flying through the sky, dancing with his partner, there are fireworks and flowers – everything is great – all while someone is touching his private parts.”
Nothing like a little PizzaGate to go with your children’s movies
The deeply disturbing message being conveyed here – and to children, no less – is that, in order to achieve what you want in life, sometimes you have to let other people do things to you that are uncomfortable and invasive.
In this case, allowing someone to touch your private parts could be a necessary requirement in order to “win” a competition.
This is how many actors and actresses make it in Hollywood, after all – and politicians in Washington, too.
It’s actually been suggested that rape and pedophilia are obligatory “rites of passage” for many young stars and starlets to make it in the ‘biz, which is exactly what “Show Dogs” seems to be suggesting – using cute, fluffy animals, of course.
Since children have a natural inclination to not let people touch their private parts, films like “Show Dogs” seem to be trying to warm them up to the idea by making the characters animals and throwing in lots of humor.
This is what Maldonado’s daughter apparently thought after seeing the scene, describing it as “her favorite part of the movie” because of the “funny reaction he had.”
The Hollywood perverts who came up with the idea likely intended for children viewing the film to have this exact reaction.
Had it been actual children on-screen and some creep like Harvey Weinstein depicted trying to grab them, well, it wouldn’t have been funny at all, for one.
Second, it wouldn’t have passed the censors as a film appropriate for viewing, especially by children.
So instead, Hollywood resorts to embedding its perversions into happy and hilarious cartoon characters that most people won’t even realize were created to brainwash them.
“Disturbingly, these are similar tactics child abusers use when grooming children – telling them to pretend they are somewhere else and that they will get a reward for withstanding their discomfort,” says Karen Hawkins from the National Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE) about the film.
“Children’s movies must be held to a higher standard, and must teach children bodily autonomy, the ability to say ‘no’ and safety, not confusing messages endorsing unwanted genital touching.”
By Ethan Huff, Guest writer


humansarefree--2020-07-14--Scientists Claim New York Has 70% Rate of Herd-Immunity to COVID-19 in New Study

Scientists claim New York has recorded a stunning 70 % rate of herd-immunity to COVID-19 in a new study .
The findings suggest it could protect New Yorkers from any second wave of Coronavirus .
68 % of people who took tests at Corona clinic in Queens received positive results while 56 % tested positive in Jackson Heights , reported Yahoo News .
The results which were shared by CityMD , a healthcare company with the New York Times show a higher rate than anywhere in the world , based on publicly released data .
Angela Rasmussen , a virologist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ positive rate in Corona “ a stunning finding.
” However , she said it would be a mistake to base public health decisions off antibody rates across a population .
Earlier , the Director of the Moscow based Microbiology Research Institute , claimed herd immunity saved Russia from Coronavirus .
He attributed lower Coronavirus death rates in Russia to higher herd immunity among Russians .
According to another study , unique micro RNA in Indians give them comparatively better immunity to protect against Coronavirus .
The study revealed that the severity of COVID-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ countries because of this unique RNA in Indians .
This is because of unique micro RNA , called hsa-miR – 27b , which successfully mutates the coronavirus responsible for COVID-19 .
In other words , Indians have a comparatively better immunity compared to other countries which will help us fight the pandemic better .
As GreatGameIndia reported earlier , studies on herd immunity are grossly neglected .
Herd immunity occurs when a large percentage of a population has developed immunity to an infection , whether through previous infections or vaccinations , thereby protecting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is akin to a chink in the chain breaking a chain reaction .
In a population in which a large proportion of individuals possess immunity , such people being unlikely to contribute to disease transmission , chains of infection are more likely to be disrupted , which either stops or slows the spread of disease .
Stanford Medicine researchers are studying this apparent phenomenon in California , where positive cases are fewer by many order of magnitude than New York .
There is huge pressure from the vaccine industry combined with the fear-mongering @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they come up with their vaccines .
In fact , past experience show this is exactly what the World Health Organization ( WHO ) did a decade ago .
In 2009 , during the H1N1 outbreak the WHO not only faked a pandemic but also kept the identity of their advisers secret from people .
Eventually , when committees were setup and it was found that WHO was following orders from the vaccine lobby , the WHO officials were force to apologies for this crime against humanity .
And now , we are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In a shocking development the President of Madagascar has made a sensational claim that the WHO offered $ 20m bribe to poison COVID-19 cure .
The Madagascar controversy has erupted days after Tanzania kicked out WHO after Goat and Papaya samples came COVID-19 Positive .
Following the Tanzanian lead Burundi also kicked out entire WHO Coronavirus Team from the country for interference in internal matters .
Meanwhile , in yet another African nation Nigeria , Bill Gates has been caught bribing forced Coronavirus program .
Just a couple of days later , an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Gates in the Italian parliament .
She also exposed Bill Gates ’ agenda in India and Africa , along with the plans to chip the human race through the digital identification program ID2020 .
In the wake of strict lockdown being imposed by governments globally , it bears upon the common people , thinkers , researchers and scientists to question whether such methods are indeed correct and singularly helpful in combating the outbreak of COVID-19 .
While the World Health Organization and vested interests are busy pushing cartelized medicine and vaccines , what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that it is scientifically proven that fresh air and sunlight have been overpowering diseases since centuries – the Cure that time forgot .

Scientists claim New York has recorded a stunning 70% rate of herd-immunity to COVID-19 in a new study. The findings suggest it could protect New Yorkers from any second wave of Coronavirus.
68% of people who took tests at Corona clinic in Queens received positive results while 56% tested positive in Jackson Heights, reported Yahoo News.
The results which were shared by CityMD, a healthcare company with the New York Times show a higher rate than anywhere in the world, based on publicly released data.
Dr Daniel Frogel, a senior vice president for operations at CityMD, which plays a key role in the New York City’s testing program, suggested that some communities may have already achieved herd immunity.
Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at Columbia University, called the high positive rate in Corona “a stunning finding.” However, she said it would be a mistake to base public health decisions off antibody rates across a population.
The “magical number for herd immunity assumes that everyone infected has complete protection from a second infection. But what about people with partial protection?” she told the NYT. “They may not get sick, but they can get infected and pass it along.”
Earlier, the Director of the Moscow based Microbiology Research Institute, claimed herd immunity saved Russia from Coronavirus. He attributed lower Coronavirus death rates in Russia to higher herd immunity among Russians.
“Three to four times [66%-75%] lower, we’re at the tail end of the list, since the herd immunity of our fellow countrymen, I am extremely confident, is much higher than that of European and American citizens,” Gingsburg said in an interview aired on Rossiya-24 TV. According to a study, unique micro RNA in Indians give them comparatively better immunity to protect against #Coronavirus. The study revealed that the severity of COVID-19 in India is less compared to other countries because of this unique RNA in Indians.https://t.co/R8ES87hWuX — GreatGameIndia (@GreatGameIndia) May 20, 2020
According to another study, unique micro RNA in Indians give them comparatively better immunity to protect against Coronavirus. The study revealed that the severity of COVID-19 in India is less compared to other countries because of this unique RNA in Indians.
This is because of unique micro RNA, called hsa-miR – 27b, which successfully mutates the coronavirus responsible for COVID-19. In other words, Indians have a comparatively better immunity compared to other countries which will help us fight the pandemic better.
As GreatGameIndia reported earlier, studies on herd immunity are grossly neglected. Herd immunity occurs when a large percentage of a population has developed immunity to an infection, whether through previous infections or vaccinations, thereby protecting individuals who are not immune. This is akin to a chink in the chain breaking a chain reaction.
In a population in which a large proportion of individuals possess immunity, such people being unlikely to contribute to disease transmission, chains of infection are more likely to be disrupted, which either stops or slows the spread of disease. Stanford Medicine researchers are studying this apparent phenomenon in California, where positive cases are fewer by many order of magnitude than New York.
There is huge pressure from the jjab industry combined with the fear-mongering from media to extend the lockdown until they come up with their jjabs. In fact, past experience show this is exactly what the World Health Organization (WHO) did a decade ago.
In 2009 during H1N1 outbreak WHO not only faked a pandemic but also kept identity of their advisers secret from people. Eventually when committees were setup and it was found WHO was taking orders from jjab lobby, WHO officials were forced to apologizehttps://t.co/kqyfX2vXiz — GreatGameIndia (@GreatGameIndia) May 24, 2020
In 2009, during the H1N1 outbreak the WHO not only faked a pandemic but also kept the identity of their advisers secret from people. Eventually, when committees were setup and it was found that WHO was following orders from the jjab lobby, the WHO officials were force to apologies for this crime against humanity. And now, we are witnessing the same episode repeat again.
In a shocking development the President of Madagascar has made a sensational claim that the WHO offered $20m bribe to poison COVID-19 cure. The Madagascar controversy has erupted days after Tanzania kicked out WHO after Goat and Papaya samples came COVID-19 Positive. Following the Tanzanian lead Burundi also kicked out entire WHO Coronavirus Team from the country for interference in internal matters.
Meanwhile, in yet another African nation Nigeria, Billy Boy has been caught bribing forced Coronavirus program. Just a couple of days later, an Italian politician demanded the arrest of Billy Boy in the Italian parliament. She also exposed Billy Boy’ agenda in India and Africa, along with the plans to chip the human race through the digital identification program ID2020.
In the wake of strict lockdown being imposed by governments globally, it bears upon the common people, thinkers, researchers and scientists to question whether such methods are indeed correct and singularly helpful in combating the outbreak of COVID-19.
While the World Health Organization and vested interests are busy pushing cartelized medicine and jjabs, what is not being told to people is that it is scientifically proven that fresh air and sunlight have been overpowering diseases since centuries – the Cure that time forgot.


humansarefree--2020-07-14--Bill Gates And His GAVI Vaccine Alliance Launching AI-Powered ‘Trust Stamp’ Combining A Vaccine And

Bill Gates And His GAVI Vaccine Alliance Launching AI-Powered ‘Trust Stamp’ Combining A Vaccine And Digital Biometric ID In West Africa

A new biometric identity platform partnered with the Gates-funded GAVI vaccine alliance and Mastercard will launch in West Africa and combine COVID-19 vaccinations , cashless payments , and potential law enforcement applications .
A biometric digital identity platform that “ evolves just as you evolve ” is set to be introduced in “ low-income , remote communities ” in West Africa thanks to a public-private partnership between the Bill Gates-backed GAVI vaccine alliance , Mastercard and the AI-powered “ identity authentication ” company , Trust Stamp .
The program , which was first launched in late 2018 , will see @ @ @ @ @ @ @ integrated into the GAVI-Mastercard “ Wellness Pass , ” a digital vaccination record and identity system that is also linked to Mastercard ’ s click-to-play system that powered by its AI and machine learning technology called NuData .
Mastercard , in addition to professing its commitment to promoting “ centralized record keeping of childhood immunization ” also describes itself as a leader toward a “ World Beyond Cash , ” and its partnership with GAVI marks a novel approach towards linking a biometric digital identity system , vaccination records , and a payment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The effort , since its launch nearly two years ago , has been funded via $ 3.8 million in GAVI donor funds in addition to a matched donation of the same amount by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation .
In early June , GAVI reported that Mastercard ’ s Wellness Pass program would be adapted in response to the coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) pandemic .
Around a month later , Mastercard announced that Trust Stamp ’ s biometric identity platform would be integrated into Wellness Pass as Trust Stamp ’ s system @ @ @ @ @ @ @ areas of the world lacking internet access or cellular connectivity and also does not require knowledge of an individual ’ s legal name or identity to function .
The Wellness Program involving GAVI , Mastercard , and Trust Stamp will soon be launched in West Africa and will be coupled with a Covid-19 vaccination program once a vaccine becomes available .
The push to implement biometrics as part of national ID registration systems has been ongoing for many years on the continent and has become a highly politicized issue in several African countries @ @ @ @ @ @ @ often revolves around the costs surrounding them , such as the biometric voter management system that the Electoral Commission of Ghana has been trying to implement ahead of their 2020 general election in December .
Bright Simons , honorary VP of the IMANI policy think tank , has questioned the “ budgetary allocation ” for the new system , claiming that the “ unnecessary registration of 17 million people all over again ” represents millions of dollars “ being blown for reasons that nobody can explain in this country.
” Trust Stamp ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by Mastercard ’ s massive investment in the company in February , utilizes a technology it calls Evergreen Hash that creates an AI-generated “ 3D mask ” based on a single photo of a person ’ s face , palm or fingerprint .
Once this “ mask ” is created , much of the original data is discarded and encryption keys are created in place of a person ’ s name or other more traditional identifiers .
“ Only a small percentage of the data that originally existed is in the hash , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stated .
“ What you have is something safer for storing because it can ’ t be used to directly identify you .
No one would recognize you in this huge jumble of numbers.
” The result , according to Genner , is an “ irreversible non-personally identifiable information ” system that “ protects privacy , reduces potential for misuse and allows effective inclusion when there is no other form of legal record.
” Genner also explained in a recent press release that the unique “ hash ” is capable of “ evolving @ @ @ @ @ @ @ health information is created every time a child or individual gets a vaccine .
Trust Stamp ’ s AI algorithms can accurately determine if different hashes belong to the same individual , meaning that “ the hash evolves over time just as you evolve , ” said Genner .
It is unclear how much the Wellness Pass initiative is motivated by public health concerns as opposed to free market considerations .
Indeed , the GAVI alliance , largely funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates and Rockefeller Foundations , as well as allied @ @ @ @ @ @ @ principally concerned with improving “ the health of markets for vaccines and other immunization products , ” rather than the health of individuals , according to its own website .
Either Way , Bill Gates Wins : As Millions Pulled From WHO , Trump Gives Billions To Gates-Founded GAVI Similarly , Mastercard ’ s GAVI partnership is directly linked to its “ World Beyond Cash ” effort , which mainly bolsters its business model that has long depended on a reduction in the use of physical cash .
Trust Stamp also shares this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as the company has stated that it is looking for new commercialization options for its Evergreen Hash technology , specifically with prison systems .
Talks with private and public prison systems have revealed an interest in their utilization of Trust Stamp ’ s technology to provide identification for individuals on parole “ without making them pay for pricey ankle bracelets that monitor their every move , ” as Trust Stamp ’ s platform would ostensibly provide that same function but in a “ touchless ” and less expensive manner .
Trust Stamp ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ both COVID-19 response and to law enforcement is part of a growing trend where numerous companies providing digital solutions to COVID-19 also offer the same solutions to prison systems and law enforcement for the purposes of surveillance and “ predictive policing.
” For instance , contact tracing software originally introduced as part of the COVID-19 response has since been used by police departments across the U.S. to track protesters during the country ’ s recent bouts of protests and civil unrest .
Similarly , a controversial Israeli tech firm currently being used in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ identify likely future COVID-19 hotspots and individuals likely to contract COVID-19 in the future , while also offering governments the ability to predict future locations of and participants in riots and civil unrest .
What is perhaps most alarming about this new “ Wellness Pass ” initiative , is that it links these “ dual use ” digital solutions to cashless payment solutions that could soon become mandated as anything over than touchless , cashless , methods of payment have been treated as potential modes for contagion by GAVI-aligned groups like the World @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the pandemic was first declared earlier this year .

Back in the summer, billionaire eugenicist Billy Boy admitted during a virtual TED Talk that his plan is to require all humans to obtain digital jjab passports before being allowed to travel again post-COVID.
Since that time, however, Gates and his allies have attempted, but failed, to memory hole all evidence of this statement.
If you try to search online for footage of Gates’ June 2020 TED Talk, the only thing that now pops up are edited versions of it that remove the portion where Gates admits to wanting to track and trace humanity with plandemic microchips and quantum dot tattoos.
“So eventually there will be sort of this digital immunity proof that you know will help facilitate the global reopening up, um,” Gates stated in the original footage, which as far as we can tell has been scrubbed everywhere except for Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Instagram page.
Here’s a mirrored video from RFK Jr’s Instagram page:

Billy Boy is Also Denying His Involvement in Implantable Microchips: ‘I’ve Never Been Involved In Any Sort Of Microchip-Type Thing’ — But There’s Evidence for That As Well
For whatever reason, Gates is suddenly shy about wanting to inject people with subdermal microchips and luciferase tattoo ink as part of the “Global Reset” that the so-called “elites” have planned for the world.
However, Gates actually has been substantially involved in a majorly invasive microchip program. In fact, he directly commissioned such a program from a company called Microchips Biotech that specializes in implantable microchips. You can follow THIS and THIS links for more information on the subject, as well as watch the video below:
Unless you already knew that Gates made the aforementioned statement during the original livestream, it is difficult to tell in the “updated” footage that this portion of the interview was removed.
Most people who watch it will agree that Gates “never said it,” simply because it is no longer available on YouTube or anywhere else in the mainstream media.
Ultimate Proof: Covid-19 Was Planned To Usher In The New World Order
Billy Boy was plotting global genocide and Mark of the Beast implants long before COVID-19
Back in April, Gates admitted during an “Ask Me Anything” (AMA) event on Reddit to much the same thing, though.
Gates told interested Redditors about his goal to transform the world in the name of “public health” by unleashing “digital certificates to show who has recovered or been tested recently or when we have a jjab, who has received it.”
The former Microsoft head also talked about quantum dot tattoos, ID2020, and other Mark of the Beast paraphernalia that will soon be released from the pit of hell to “cure” the world of COVID-19.
In July 2019, roughly six months before COVID-19 was even a thing, Scientific American published an in-depth article about how Gates had commissioned scientists from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) to develop said technology.
Just in time for COVID-19, Gates invested billions into a program that will eventually implant quantum dot tattoos into children so their health status can be tracked using smartphone apps.
Microsoft also developed an implantable chip technology with sensors that will monitor body and brain activity. Those who comply with Gates’ microchip scheme will be “awarded” cryptocurrency payments and other “perks.”
Also in July 2019, Gates bought 3.7 million shares of Serco, a military contractor with contracts in both the United States and the United Kingdom that tracks and traces pandemic infections and jjab compliance.
Other Gates investments include $20 million in MicroCHIPS, a company that makes digital implants, as well as $1 billion in EarthNow, a company that promises to blanket the globe in 5G video surveillance satellites.
“EarthNow will launch 500 satellites allowing governments and large enterprises to live-stream monitor almost every ‘corner’ of the Earth, providing instantaneous video feedback with one-second delay,” reports Children’s Health Defense (CHD).
“The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation also acquired 5.3 million shares of Crown Castle, which owns 5G spy antennas including more than 40,000 cell towers and 65,000 small cells.”
By Ethan Huff, Guest writer


humansarefree--2020-07-15--George Soros Sends $220M to US Groups Demanding Police Defunding

The president of George Soros ’ s Open Society Foundations declared that now is ‘ the moment we ’ ve been investing in for the last 25 years.
’ The George Soros–founded Open Society Foundations has announced that it is investing $ 220 million in “ Black-led justice organizations ” that among themselves call for defunding the police and mass mail-in voting and express support for the riots that have swept across the country following the death of George Floyd .
“ There is this call for justice in Black and brown communities , an explosion of not just sympathy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Open Society Foundations president Patrick Gaspard told The New York Times .
“ So it ’ s time to double down .
And we understood we can place a bet on these activists — Black and white — who see this as a moment of not just incrementalism , but whole-scale reform.
” Soros is a prolific financier of left-wing causes throughout the United States and around the world , including abortion , euthanasia , population control , same-sex “ marriage , ” transgenderism , and more .
His Open Society Foundations spends @ @ @ @ @ @ @ different countries , including $ 150 million per year funding the left-wing American Civil Liberties Union ( ACLU ) , the leading abortion company Planned Parenthood , and other liberal groups .
Last year he invested $ 5.1 million in a super-PAC dedicated to funding groups working against Trump ’ s re-election .
Gaspard told The New York Times that now is “ the moment we ’ ve been investing in for the last 25 years.
” “ We recognize that the struggle to dismantle systemic racism is an ongoing one ; it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ republic to the present day , and is embedded in every level of government and in our penal and justice systems , ” Gaspard said in a press release published earlier yesterday .
“ But the power surge of people who have taken to the streets to demand that this nation do better — people of all ages , from all backgrounds , and in every corner of this country — gives hope to us all.
” His comments were echoed by Tom Perriello , executive director of Open Society-U.S. , who directly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ The success of this movement , the largest in U.S. history , will be measured over years , not weeks , and we can not say that Black lives matter and not make a multi-year commitment to a strategy set by and centering Black leaders and organizations who changed America ’ s sense of what is possible , ” Perriello said .
The press release from the Open Society Foundations references four groups who will receive the funding : Black Voters Matter , Circle for Justice Innovations , Repairers of the Breach @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Black Voters Matter social media pages are full of posts calling for the defunding of the police as well as promoting mass mail-in voting .
Calls to defund the police have coincided with violent riots around the country following the death of George Floyd in May .
Last month the Black Voters Matters organization also re-tweeted a post by BLM Louisville celebrating a group forming a human barricade across a bridge and appearing to bring all traffic to a halt .
The Circle for Justice Innovations organization , whose members say their mission @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” through transforming the U.S. criminal legal system , likewise expresses a general support for the unrest that has swept America following Floyd ’ s death .
“ We are moved by the masses , in cities across the country , who are invoking their right to protest against these persistent forms of structural violence .
“ These protests , initiated by righteous Black and Brown people , have been joined by people of all races , ” a statement on the home page of their website reads .
The Repairers of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ challenge the position that the preeminent moral issues are prayer in public schools , abortion , and property rights.
” Instead , they say , the moral public concerns of our faith traditions are how our society treats the poor , women , LGBTQ people , children , workers , immigrants , communities of color , and the sick — the people whom Jesus calls ‘ the least of these.
’ ” In a tweet published last week , the group promoted an article by Marxist news service People ’ s World ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ founded by the Communist Party USA ) , while highlighting a quote from the article asserting that “ [ s ] ince plantation owners paid preachers in the early 19th century to defend slavery against the clear moral arguments of abolitionists , American Christianity has been infected by # Slave holder Religion.
” Earlier this month , Repairers of the Breach used social media to criticize the Catholic Church , alleging complicity with racism , citing the case of Fr .
Theodore Rothrock , who has been suspended by the ordinary of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Timothy Doherty , after Fr .
Rothrock stated on social media that Black Lives Matter organizers feed off the fear they promote .
A LifeSiteNews petition in support of Fr .
Rothrock has been signed by more than 37,000 people .
Last month , a spokesperson for the Open Society Foundations denied any connection between the organization and the unrest across the country .
“ I think partly it ’ s an attempt to distract from the real matters at hand — the pandemic , the protests or the Black Lives Matter movement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Foundations chief communications officer , said in a statement .
“ It ’ s pretty demeaning to the people out there protesting when someone says they ’ re all paid .
It ’ s insulting .
”

The president of George Soros’s Open Society Foundations declared that now is ‘the moment we’ve been investing in for the last 25 years.’
by Paul Smeaton
The George Soros–founded Open Society Foundations has announced that it is investing $220 million in “Black-led justice organizations” that among themselves call for defunding the police and mass mail-in voting and express support for the riots that have swept across the country following the death of George Floyd.
“There is this call for justice in Black and brown communities, an explosion of not just sympathy but solidarity across the board,” Open Society Foundations president Patrick Gaspard told The New York Times.
“So it’s time to double down. And we understood we can place a bet on these activists — Black and white — who see this as a moment of not just incrementalism, but whole-scale reform.”
Soros is a prolific financier of left-wing causes throughout the United States and around the world, including abortion, euthanasia, population control, same-sex “marriage,” transgenderism, and more.
His Open Society Foundations spends almost $1 billion annually in 100 different countries, including $150 million per year funding the left-wing American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the leading abortion company Planned Parenthood, and other liberal groups.
Last year he invested $5.1 million in a super-PAC dedicated to funding groups working against Trump’s re-election.
Gaspard told The New York Times that now is “the moment we’ve been investing in for the last 25 years.”
“We recognize that the struggle to dismantle systemic racism is an ongoing one; it has existed from the dawn of the republic to the present day, and is embedded in every level of government and in our penal and justice systems,” Gaspard said in a press release published earlier yesterday.
“But the power surge of people who have taken to the streets to demand that this nation do better — people of all ages, from all backgrounds, and in every corner of this country — gives hope to us all.”
His comments were echoed by Tom Perriello, executive director of Open Society-U.S., who directly referenced the Black Lives Matter movement.
“The success of this movement, the largest in U.S. history, will be measured over years, not weeks, and we cannot say that Black lives matter and not make a multi-year commitment to a strategy set by and centering Black leaders and organizations who changed America’s sense of what is possible,” Perriello said.
The press release from the Open Society Foundations references four groups who will receive the funding: Black Voters Matter, Circle for Justice Innovations, Repairers of the Breach, and Equal Justice Initiative.
The Black Voters Matter social media pages are full of posts calling for the defunding of the police as well as promoting mass mail-in voting.
Join Advancement Project National Office TOMORROW from 5-6:30 PM ET to learn more about vote by mail issues, how to ensure you receive your absentee ballots for upcoming elections, and engaging voters. #ItsAboutUs ✊🏾 Register Now: https://t.co/O17spd8dEq pic.twitter.com/O3BsZBI5Ot — Black Voters Matter (@BlackVotersMtr) July 8, 2020
Calls to defund the police have coincided with violent riots around the country following the death of George Floyd in May.
Last month the Black Voters Matters organization also re-tweeted a post by BLM Louisville celebrating a group forming a human barricade across a bridge and appearing to bring all traffic to a halt.
The Circle for Justice Innovations organization, whose members say their mission to “end mass criminalization and incarceration” through transforming the U.S. criminal legal system, likewise expresses a general support for the unrest that has swept America following Floyd’s death.
“We are moved by the masses, in cities across the country, who are invoking their right to protest against these persistent forms of structural violence.
“These protests, initiated by righteous Black and Brown people, have been joined by people of all races,” a statement on the home page of their website reads.
The Repairers of the Breach organization in their mission statement “challenge the position that the preeminent moral issues are prayer in public schools, abortion, and property rights.”
Instead, they say, the moral public concerns of our faith traditions are how our society treats the poor, women, LGBTQ people, children, workers, immigrants, communities of color, and the sick — the people whom Jesus calls ‘the least of these.’”
In a tweet published last week, the group promoted an article by Marxist news service People’s World (a continuation of the Daily Worker, founded by the Communist Party USA), while highlighting a quote from the article asserting that “[s]ince plantation owners paid preachers in the early 19th century to defend slavery against the clear moral arguments of abolitionists, American Christianity has been infected by #Slave holder Religion.”
“Since plantation owners paid preachers in the early 19th century to defend slavery against the clear moral arguments of abolitionists, American Christianity has been infected by #SlaveholderReligion.” @wilsonhartgrove & @RevDrBarber https://t.co/TtFgnZeEur — Repairers of the Breach (@BRepairers) July 9, 2020
Earlier this month, Repairers of the Breach used social media to criticize the Catholic Church, alleging complicity with racism, citing the case of Fr. Theodore Rothrock, who has been suspended by the ordinary of the Diocese of Lafayette, Indiana, Bishop Timothy Doherty, after Fr. Rothrock stated on social media that Black Lives Matter organizers feed off the fear they promote.
A LifeSiteNews petition in support of Fr. Rothrock has been signed by more than 37,000 people.
“Until white Catholics have the courage to face deeply uncomfortable truths about the depth of racism in the nation and end the Church’s complicity of silence, attitudes like [Father] Rothrock’s will continue to fester and poison American Catholicism.” https://t.co/lbfucOhMs6 — Repairers of the Breach (@BRepairers) July 2, 2020
Last month, a spokesperson for the Open Society Foundations denied any connection between the organization and the unrest across the country.
“I think partly it’s an attempt to distract from the real matters at hand — the pandemic, the protests or the Black Lives Matter movement,” Laura Silber, Open Society Foundations chief communications officer, said in a statement.
“It’s pretty demeaning to the people out there protesting when someone says they’re all paid. It’s insulting.”