humansarefree--2020-06-18--ANTIFA Is Not ‘Fighting For Freedom’, They Are A Highly-Funded, Organized Militia Force Created To B

ANTIFA Is Not ‘Fighting For Freedom’, They Are A Highly-Funded, Organized Militia Force Created To Bring In Communist Revolution To America

Like their Marxist comrades , ANTIFA seeks to destroy the American emphasis on liberty under law and to impose a revival of one of history ’ s most repressive ideologies from the Communist Revolution of 1917 .
The very name of Planned Parenthood would lead to you believe that they seek to help people plan to become parents , when the exact opposite is true , they exist to prevent people from becoming parents by murdering their children .
So it is with ANTIFA , a name that implies they are anti-fascist , when in fact they are the most @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and around the globe .
ANTIFA wears the black and red colors so favored by Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany , they wear masks and hoods to hide their identities like the Ku Klux Klan does , and they smash all those who oppose them with pipes and bats , setting fire to whole city blocks in the name of freedom .
This is not freedom , it is anarchy , and it is demonic .
It is also highly-funded by people like George Soros through his Open Society Foundations .
ANTIFA is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ organization of the highest level , and you can not be rightly called a Christian if you support them .
Antifa Is Not Fighting For Freedom , But For Communist Revolution FROM THE FEDERALIST : In the immediate aftermath of the Charlottesville violence , several prominent figures — including CNN anchor Chris Cuomo and Jeffrey Goldberg , editor-in-chief of The Atlantic — equated left-wing “ Antifa ” activists with the thousands of Allied soldiers who stormed Normandy ’ s beaches to invade Adolf Hitler ’ s “ Fortress Europe ” on D-Day .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the thousands of soldiers in the Red Army , who brutally marched toward Berlin , where they would establish Soviet hegemony in the so-called German Democratic Republic after defeating Hitler .
Antifa returns to the news this week .
On Tuesday night , former Breitbart.com editor Milo Yiannopoulos spoke at California State University , Fullerton in a program sponsored by that university ’ s College Republicans .
Seven were arrested amid reports of head-punching and pepper-spraying .
Protesters of the event chanted “ Cops and the Klan go hand in hand !
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ revolution can defeat capitalist reaction.
” In February , Antifa militants committed such mayhem while protesting Yiannopoulos ’ appearance at the University of California at Berkeley that university officials cancelled his speech at the last minute .
“ Modern Antifa groups in the United States and Europe have been documented to receive funding and support from Leftist radicals such as George Soros ’ Open Society groups .
Antifa ’ s behavior has been likened to the intimidating goon squads of Hitler ’ s Brown Shirts or Mussolini ’ s Black Shirts .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ free speech or protests by conservatives in the United States and Europe .
East Germany is another Antifa epicenter much like Portland , Oregon .
Antifa joined the Occupy Wall Street movement in America.
” – ANTIFA : SATAN ’ S COMMUNISTS AND ANARCHISTS On Saturday , Antifa will join other leftist groups in massive nationwide protests designed to force President Donald Trump ’ s administration out of office .
Organizing those protests is “ Refuse Fascism , ” which declares that “ in the name of humanity , we REFUSE to accept @ @ @ @ @ @ @ portrayals throughout American media , Antifa are more than “ anti-fascists.
” Antifa represent the chaos of Germany ’ s Weimar Republic and provide the violent complement to academic neo-Marxism .
Like their philosophical comrades , Antifa seek to destroy the American emphasis on liberty under law and to impose a revival of one of history ’ s most repressive ideologies .
Bernd Langer , whose “ 80 Years of Anti-Fascist Action ” was published by Germany ’ s Association for the Promotion of Anti-Fascist Literature , succinctly defined the rhetorical subterfuge .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ an ideology , ” wrote Langer , a former Antifa member , for “ an anti-capitalist form of struggle.
” Short for the German phrase , “ Antifaschistische Aktion , ” Antifa served as the paramilitary arm of the German Communist Party ( KPD ) , which the Soviet Union funded .
In other words , Antifa became the German Communists ’ version of the Nazis ’ brown-shirted SA .
The KPD made no secret of Antifa ’ s affiliation .
A 1932 photo of KPD headquarters in Berlin prominently displayed the double-flagged @ @ @ @ @ @ @ slogans .
In a photo from the 1932 Unity Congress of Antifa in Berlin , the double-flagged banner shared space with the hammer and sickle and with two large cartoons .
One supported the KPD , the other mocked the SPD , Germany ’ s Social Democratic Party .
Today ’ s Antifa embrace those roots .
During February ’ s protest in Berkeley , masked Antifa agitators caused nearly $ 100,000 in damage by starting fires , breaking windows , assaulting bystanders with pepper spray and flagpoles , painting graffiti on nearby @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ Refuse Fascism , ” the group organizing Saturday ’ s protests , is controlled by the Revolutionary Communist Party USA , which seeks to create a Marxist United States through violent revolution .
Law and Order Are Among Antifa ’ s Enemies Antifa ’ s goal to suppress “ fascism ” reflects the views of neo-Marxist philosopher Herbert Marcuse .
“ A policy of unequal treatment would protect radicalism on the Left against that on the Right , ” Marcuse wrote in “ Repressive Tolerance , ” his 1965 essay .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ mean intolerance against movements from the Right and toleration of movements from the Left ” extending “ to the stage of action as well as of discussion and propaganda , of deed as well as of word.
” Marcuse dismissed the idea of individual liberty protected by law in favor of a Marxist society favoring ostensibly oppressed groups at the expense of everybody else .
Such a society , Marcuse wrote , would demand “ the withdrawal of toleration of speech and assembly from groups and movements ” that not only “ promote @ @ @ @ @ @ @ discrimination on the grounds of race and religion ” but also “ oppose the extension of public services , social security , medical care , etc.
” and “ may necessitate new and rigid restrictions on teachings and practices in the educational institutions.
” Marcuse even justified violence : “ there is a ‘ natural right ’ of resistance for oppressed and overpowered minorities to use extralegal means if the legal ones have proved to be inadequate , ” Marcuse wrote .
“ Law and order are always and everywhere the law and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it is nonsensical to invoke the absolute authority of this law and this order against those who suffer from it and struggle against it … for their share of humanity .
If they use violence , they do not start a new chain of violence but try to break an established one.
” In expressing his contempt for “ the sacred liberalistic principle of equality for ‘ the other side , ’ ” Marcuse maintained in 1968 ” that there are issues where either there is no ‘ other side ’ in any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ where ‘ the other side ’ is demonstrably ‘ regressive ’ and impedes possible improvement of the human condition.
” K-Su Park , a University of California at Los Angeles law fellow , reflected Marcuse ’ s thought when in an op-ed in The New York Times she challenged the American Civil Liberties Union to reconsider its approach to the First Amendment .
The ACLU represented Jason Kessler , who organized the “ Unite The Right ” rally and sued the City of Charlottesville for revoking his permit for the protest .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the country is on a level playing field , that at some point it overcame its history of racial discrimination to achieve a real democracy , the cornerstone of which is freedom of expression , ” Park wrote .
“ Other forms of structural discrimination and violence also restrict the exercise of speech , such as police intimidation of African-Americans and Latinos .
The danger that communities face because of their speech isn ’ t equal.
” Park ’ s fellowship is with UCLA ’ s critical race studies program .
Critical race @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sociological approach developed by Germany ’ s neo-Marxist Frankfurt School , where Marcuse was a leading thinker .
Johns Hopkins professor N.D.B .
Connolly blended Marcuse ’ s philosophy with Antifa ’ s militancy in a Washington Post op-ed , where he compared the United States ’ racial history to a game of rock-paper-scissors .
“ For a long while , we ’ ve been throwing a lot of ‘ paper , ’ ” Connolly wrote .
“ Liberalism — our paper — preserves our country ’ s long commitment to contracts .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ with their government .
The government ’ s job , in turn , has been to enforce contracts between individuals and groups .
“ Truly , when people ask for rights , be they women ’ s rights , gay and transgender rights , or rights as people of color , they are asking for contract rights.
” “ Right at the country ’ s founding , racists cut black and indigenous people out of liberalism ’ s contract .
Black bodies and Native American land did not deserve the protection of contract @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ A half-century ago , nothing less than radical anti-racism could reduce white supremacy to an outlaw religion .
… In April 1968 , amid a flurry of other ‘ rocks , ’ riots shook American cities following the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr .
It took that rolling unrest … to spur President Lyndon Johnson and Congress to action .
Within a week they had passed the Fair Housing Act.
” Connolly concluded by advocating similar measures .
“ Segregationists have again assumed their pedestals in the Justice Department , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” he wrote .
“ Paper alone won ’ t drive them out .
Start throwing rocks.
” In slandering those who hold opposing views , and in essentially calling Martin Luther King Jr. a failure , Connolly reflected the true “ Antifa ” spirit : Neo-Marxism über alles .
( Read more ) Antifa represents organized and continuous intimidation and physical violence against whoever is against their credence of anarchy with no government .
Antifa arose from para-military factions and has been likened to a militia .
Marxist Antifa-progenitors first arose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1917 and were instrumental in bringing down the Russian government .
Antifa groups then migrated to Germany .

Like their Marxist comrades, ANTIFA seeks to destroy the American emphasis on liberty under law and to impose a revival of one of history’s most repressive ideologies from the Communist Revolution of 1917.
The very name of Planned Parenthood would lead to you believe that they seek to help people plan to become parents, when the exact opposite is true, they exist to prevent people from becoming parents by murdering their children.
So it is with ANTIFA, a name that implies they are anti-fascist, when in fact they are the most resolutely virulent fascist organization in America, and around the globe.
ANTIFA wears the black and red colors so favored by Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany, they wear masks and hoods to hide their identities like the Ku Klux Klan does, and they smash all those who oppose them with pipes and bats, setting fire to whole city blocks in the name of freedom.
This is not freedom, it is anarchy, and it is demonic. It is also highly-funded by people like George Soros through his Open Society Foundations.
ANTIFA is a hate group, a domestic terror organization of the highest level, and you cannot be rightly called a Christian if you support them.
Antifa Is Not Fighting For Freedom, But For Communist Revolution
FROM THE FEDERALIST: In the immediate aftermath of the Charlottesville violence, several prominent figures — including CNN anchor Chris Cuomo and Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic — equated left-wing “Antifa” activists with the thousands of Allied soldiers who stormed Normandy’s beaches to invade Adolf Hitler’s “Fortress Europe” on D-Day.
A more appropriate equation would be with the thousands of soldiers in the Red Army, who brutally marched toward Berlin, where they would establish Soviet hegemony in the so-called German Democratic Republic after defeating Hitler.
Antifa returns to the news this week. On Tuesday night, former Breitbart.com editor Milo Yiannopoulos spoke at California State University, Fullerton in a program sponsored by that university’s College Republicans.
Seven were arrested amid reports of head-punching and pepper-spraying. Protesters of the event chanted “Cops and the Klan go hand in hand!” and held signs reading “Only socialist revolution can defeat capitalist reaction.”
In February, Antifa militants committed such mayhem while protesting Yiannopoulos’ appearance at the University of California at Berkeley that university officials cancelled his speech at the last minute.
“Modern Antifa groups in the United States and Europe have been documented to receive funding and support from Leftist radicals such as George Soros’ Open Society groups. Antifa’s behavior has been likened to the intimidating goon squads of Hitler’s Brown Shirts or Mussolini’s Black Shirts.
“Recently they tried to shut down any free speech or protests by conservatives in the United States and Europe. East Germany is another Antifa epicenter much like Portland, Oregon. Antifa joined the Occupy Wall Street movement in America.” – ANTIFA: SATAN’S COMMUNISTS AND ANARCHISTS
On Saturday, Antifa will join other leftist groups in massive nationwide protests designed to force President Donald Trump’s administration out of office.
Organizing those protests is “Refuse Fascism,” which declares that “in the name of humanity, we REFUSE to accept a Fascist America!”
Despite antiseptic portrayals throughout American media, Antifa are more than “anti-fascists.”
Antifa represent the chaos of Germany’s Weimar Republic and provide the violent complement to academic neo-Marxism.
Like their philosophical comrades, Antifa seek to destroy the American emphasis on liberty under law and to impose a revival of one of history’s most repressive ideologies.
Antifa Is Anti-West and Anti-Capitalist
Bernd Langer, whose “80 Years of Anti-Fascist Action” was published by Germany’s Association for the Promotion of Anti-Fascist Literature, succinctly defined the rhetorical subterfuge.
“Anti-fascism is a strategy rather than an ideology,” wrote Langer, a former Antifa member, for “an anti-capitalist form of struggle.”
Short for the German phrase, “Antifaschistische Aktion,” Antifa served as the paramilitary arm of the German Communist Party (KPD), which the Soviet Union funded.
In other words, Antifa became the German Communists’ version of the Nazis’ brown-shirted SA.
The KPD made no secret of Antifa’s affiliation. A 1932 photo of KPD headquarters in Berlin prominently displayed the double-flagged Antifa emblem among other Communist symbols and slogans.
In a photo from the 1932 Unity Congress of Antifa in Berlin, the double-flagged banner shared space with the hammer and sickle and with two large cartoons. One supported the KPD, the other mocked the SPD, Germany’s Social Democratic Party.
Today’s Antifa embrace those roots. During February’s protest in Berkeley, masked Antifa agitators caused nearly $100,000 in damage by starting fires, breaking windows, assaulting bystanders with pepper spray and flagpoles, painting graffiti on nearby businesses, and destroying automatic teller machines.
“Refuse Fascism,” the group organizing Saturday’s protests, is controlled by the Revolutionary Communist Party USA, which seeks to create a Marxist United States through violent revolution.
Law and Order Are Among Antifa’s Enemies
Antifa’s goal to suppress “fascism” reflects the views of neo-Marxist philosopher Herbert Marcuse. “A policy of unequal treatment would protect radicalism on the Left against that on the Right,” Marcuse wrote in “Repressive Tolerance,” his 1965 essay.
“Liberating tolerance, then, would mean intolerance against movements from the Right and toleration of movements from the Left” extending “to the stage of action as well as of discussion and propaganda, of deed as well as of word.”
Marcuse dismissed the idea of individual liberty protected by law in favor of a Marxist society favoring ostensibly oppressed groups at the expense of everybody else.
Such a society, Marcuse wrote, would demand “the withdrawal of toleration of speech and assembly from groups and movements” that not only “promote aggressive policies, armament, chauvinism, discrimination on the grounds of race and religion” but also “oppose the extension of public services, social security, medical care, etc.” and “may necessitate new and rigid restrictions on teachings and practices in the educational institutions.”
Marcuse even justified violence: “there is a ‘natural right’ of resistance for oppressed and overpowered minorities to use extralegal means if the legal ones have proved to be inadequate,” Marcuse wrote.
“Law and order are always and everywhere the law and order which protect the established hierarchy; it is nonsensical to invoke the absolute authority of this law and this order against those who suffer from it and struggle against it … for their share of humanity. If they use violence, they do not start a new chain of violence but try to break an established one.”
In expressing his contempt for “the sacred liberalistic principle of equality for ‘the other side,’” Marcuse maintained in 1968 ”that there are issues where either there is no ‘other side’ in any more than a formalistic sense, or where ‘the other side’ is demonstrably ‘regressive’ and impedes possible improvement of the human condition.”
Elements of Today’s Left Embrace Marcuse’s Ideas
K-Su Park, a University of California at Los Angeles law fellow, reflected Marcuse’s thought when in an op-ed in The New York Times she challenged the American Civil Liberties Union to reconsider its approach to the First Amendment.
The ACLU represented Jason Kessler, who organized the “Unite The Right” rally and sued the City of Charlottesville for revoking his permit for the protest.
The ACLU’s approach “implies that the country is on a level playing field, that at some point it overcame its history of racial discrimination to achieve a real democracy, the cornerstone of which is freedom of expression,” Park wrote.
“Other forms of structural discrimination and violence also restrict the exercise of speech, such as police intimidation of African-Americans and Latinos. The danger that communities face because of their speech isn’t equal.”
Park’s fellowship is with UCLA’s critical race studies program. Critical race studies comes from critical theory, a sociological approach developed by Germany’s neo-Marxist Frankfurt School, where Marcuse was a leading thinker.
Johns Hopkins professor N.D.B. Connolly blended Marcuse’s philosophy with Antifa’s militancy in a Washington Post op-ed, where he compared the United States’ racial history to a game of rock-paper-scissors.
“For a long while, we’ve been throwing a lot of ‘paper,’” Connolly wrote.
“Liberalism — our paper — preserves our country’s long commitment to contracts. Under liberalism, citizens stand in contract with their government. The government’s job, in turn, has been to enforce contracts between individuals and groups.
“Truly, when people ask for rights, be they women’s rights, gay and transgender rights, or rights as people of color, they are asking for contract rights.”
‘Rock Breaks Scissors’
But racism, Connolly argued, serves as scissors:
“Right at the country’s founding, racists cut black and indigenous people out of liberalism’s contract. Black bodies and Native American land did not deserve the protection of contract. They deserved bondage and expropriation.”
The solution? “No matter its form, rock breaks scissors,” Connolly wrote.
“A half-century ago, nothing less than radical anti-racism could reduce white supremacy to an outlaw religion. … In April 1968, amid a flurry of other ‘rocks,’ riots shook American cities following the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. It took that rolling unrest … to spur President Lyndon Johnson and Congress to action. Within a week they had passed the Fair Housing Act.”
Connolly concluded by advocating similar measures. “Segregationists have again assumed their pedestals in the Justice Department, the White House and many other American temples,” he wrote. “Paper alone won’t drive them out. Start throwing rocks.”
In slandering those who hold opposing views, and in essentially calling Martin Luther King Jr. a failure, Connolly reflected the true “Antifa” spirit: Neo-Marxism über alles. (Read more)
George Soros Funded ANTIFA Burns Down America
Antifa represents organized and continuous intimidation and physical violence against whoever is against their credence of anarchy with no government. Antifa arose from para-military factions and has been likened to a militia.
Marxist Antifa-progenitors first arose in the Russian Communist Revolution starting in 1917 and were instrumental in bringing down the Russian government. Antifa groups then migrated to Germany.
Source: Nowtheendbegins.com


humansarefree--2020-06-18--Huge Metallic Mass Under the Moon’s Surface Has Scientists Scratching Their Heads

Astronomers at Baylor University have just found something on the Moon ’ s largest crater that has left them confused and wondering how exactly it got there in the first place .
“ A team of astronomers found a ‘ large excess of mass ’ under the Moon ’ s largest crater , the Aitken basin — likely a relic from an ancient asteroid impact event , but perhaps something much stranger.
” “ Imagine taking a pile of metal five times larger than the Big Island of Hawaii and burying it underground .
That ’ s roughly how much @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exactly did this enormous mass come from ?
There are two theories , but no solid answers just yet , Phys.org reports : “ The dense mass — whatever it is , wherever it came from ’ — is weighing the basin floor downward by more than half a mile , ( James ) said .
“ Computer simulations of large asteroid impacts suggest that , under the right conditions , an iron-nickel core of an asteroid may be dispersed into the upper mantle ( the layer between the Moon ’ s crust @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Another possibility is that the large mass might be a concentration of dense oxides associated with the last stage of lunar magma ocean solidification.
” The Moon crater where the anomaly was found is the largest preserved crater in the solar system , making it an object of fascination for astronomers .
Dr. James called the crater basin “ one of the best natural laboratories for studying catastrophic impact events , an ancient process that shaped all of the rocky planets and moons we see today.
” Researchers found the metallic mass @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that have been taking photographs of the Moon , CNN notes : “ The researchers from Baylor used various sets of data collected from space crafts that measure the gravity around the moon , and compared them to maps and imaging of the moon ’ s surface .
As a result , they found a dense metallic mass pulling down on the floor of the basin.
” This new information could well help explain the formation of various celestial bodies in our solar system , according to National Geographic : “ ’ It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ says Sara Mazrouei of Western University ’ s Center for Planetary Science and Exploration , who was not involved in the work .
And by improving our understanding of this structure , scientists hope to better understand the formation of bodies throughout our celestial family.
” Sadly , the casual stargazer can not see the crater in question from Earth , as it ’ s literally on the far side of the Moon .
So , for now , we ’ ll just have to content ourselves with the incredible images coming from @ @

Astronomers at Baylor University have just found something on the Moon’s largest crater that has left them confused and wondering how exactly it got there in the first place.
According to Futurism.com:
“A team of astronomers found a ‘large excess of mass’ under the Moon’s largest crater, the Aitken basin — likely a relic from an ancient asteroid impact event, but perhaps something much stranger.”
Lead researcher Peter B. James noted:
“Imagine taking a pile of metal five times larger than the Big Island of Hawaii and burying it underground. That’s roughly how much unexpected mass we detected.”
So where exactly did this enormous mass come from? There are two theories, but no solid answers just yet, Phys.org reports:
“The dense mass — whatever it is, wherever it came from’ — is weighing the basin floor downward by more than half a mile, (James) said.
“Computer simulations of large asteroid impacts suggest that, under the right conditions, an iron-nickel core of an asteroid may be dispersed into the upper mantle (the layer between the Moon’s crust and core) during an impact.
“Another possibility is that the large mass might be a concentration of dense oxides associated with the last stage of lunar magma ocean solidification.”
A sub-surface metallic anomaly on the moon? Somebody call dr. Heywood Floyd, STAT!https://t.co/DIVmrFKv2i — Bjørnar ‘cmdr inshadowz’ Haveland (@inshadowz) June 13, 2019
The Moon crater where the anomaly was found is the largest preserved crater in the solar system, making it an object of fascination for astronomers.
Dr. James called the crater basin “one of the best natural laboratories for studying catastrophic impact events, an ancient process that shaped all of the rocky planets and moons we see today.”
Researchers found the metallic mass thanks to space probes and other spacecraft that have been taking photographs of the Moon, CNN notes:
“The researchers from Baylor used various sets of data collected from space crafts that measure the gravity around the moon, and compared them to maps and imaging of the moon’s surface. As a result, they found a dense metallic mass pulling down on the floor of the basin.”
This new information could well help explain the formation of various celestial bodies in our solar system, according to National Geographic:
“’It’s just so mysterious’” says Sara Mazrouei of Western University’s Center for Planetary Science and Exploration, who was not involved in the work. And by improving our understanding of this structure, scientists hope to better understand the formation of bodies throughout our celestial family.”
Sadly, the casual stargazer cannot see the crater in question from Earth, as it’s literally on the far side of the Moon. So, for now, we’ll just have to content ourselves with the incredible images coming from NASA.
Reference: Ancient-code.com


humansarefree--2020-06-19--Dear Black People, You Are Being Used and Set Up to Start a Race War!

The violent events that we are witnessing in the mainstream media are being orchestrated by the powers that shouldn ’ t be , in order to create further division and racism .
The narrative that they have orchestrated looks like this : – black people rioting in defence of a career criminal who was resisting arrest – black people destroying state property – black people torching private businesses – black people stealing from shops and supermarkets – black people lining up white people to kiss their feet – black people beating white people all over the country for no reason @ @ @ @ @ @ @ alike during the riots – armed black people taking over entire neighbourhoods – armed black people demanding the abolition of the police , so that they can do all of the above without fear of consequences .
The “ elites ” are , once again , painting black people as criminals who hate whites , the police and America .
But that ’ s not true at all !
We are all being manipulated in the hopes that a new wave of racism will take place .
Also read : Race Bait And @ @ @ @ @ @ @ organise in large numbers ( you can start a petition ) and speak up against the ongoing violence and the destruction of property .
The world needs to see that the majority condemns violence and that we support peaceful assemblies and dialogue .

The violent events that we are witnessing in the mainstream media are being orchestrated by the powers that shouldn’t be, in order to create further division and racism.
The narrative that they have orchestrated looks like this:
– black people rioting in defence of a career criminal who was resisting arrest
– black people destroying state property
– black people torching private businesses
– black people stealing from shops and supermarkets
– black people lining up white people to kiss their feet
– black people beating white people all over the country for no reason
– black people murdering blacks and whites alike during the riots
– armed black people taking over entire neighbourhoods
– armed black people demanding the abolition of the police, so that they can do all of the above without fear of consequences.
The “elites” are, once again, painting black people as criminals who hate whites, the police and America.
But that’s not true at all! We are all being manipulated in the hopes that a new wave of racism will take place.
Don’t let that happen!
Also read: Race Bait And The Controlled Opposition Protests
Black people must organise in large numbers (you can start a petition) and speak up against the ongoing violence and the destruction of property.
The world needs to see that the majority condemns violence and that we support peaceful assemblies and dialogue.
God bless you all!


humansarefree--2020-06-19--Child Porn Discovered on Pentagon Computers (Updates)

Within the past couple of years alone millions of people around the world have become aware of the fact that the trafficking of both men , women , as well as children is a big problem .
Just as we see with illegal arms sales , this type of activity seems to operate within the ‘ black market ’ and has sustained itself for years .
The reason why it seems to continue to sustain itself year after year is simply the fact that many people in positions of power are involved .
In fact , based on my research @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this type of activity around the world are actually the ones we go to in order to combat the problem .
Take Cardinal George Pell as a prime example .
Not long ago Pell became the highest ranking Vatican official to ever be convicted of child sexual abuse .
Unfortunately , his conviction was overturned and the tradition of powerful people getting off the hook continues .
It ’ s disturbing to contemplate the idea that Cardinal George Pell is or would be involved in such things , after all , he himself @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in 1996 .
For decades , the Vatican has been facing multiple sexual abuse allegations , this includes Popes as well as many other high ranking Vatican officials throughout .
This type of activity seems to be quite widespread in places of power and unfortunately there are a number of examples , one place where this type of activity seems to be quite rampant is within the Department of Defense .
Not long ago , I wrote about how Congress is now looking at a bipartisan bill to stop employees from sharing child @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Where are these kids coming from ?
Who is making these kids ‘ perform , ’ who is filming them , and where are these high-ranking people getting this from ?
“ The notion that the Department of Defense ’ s network and Pentagon-issued computers may be used to view , create , or circulate such horrifying images is a shameful disgrace , and one we must fight head on.
” – Abigail Spanberger ( D-Virginia ) , spoken in a statement on Tuesday as she and co-sponsor Mark Meadows ( R-N. Carolina @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Abuse ( END Network Abuse ) Act in the House .
( source ) As The Hill reports , “ The Pentagon ’ s Defense Criminal Investigative Service subsequently identified hundreds of DOD-affiliated individuals as suspects involved in accessing child pornography , several of whom used government devices to use and share the images.
” It ’ s called the End National Defense Network Abuse ( END Network Abuse ) and it was introduced in the wake of an investigation called “ Project Flicker ” carried out by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , including many affiliated with DOD , who were subscribed to child porn websites .
So , what ’ s the update ?
The update is that it ’ s most likely this bill will go nowhere .
It ’ s hardly received any attention from media outlets , and it only have a 3 percent chance of being enacted and moving forward How can a bill that “ directs the Department of Defense to establish ( 1 ) an initiative to improve the capacity of military criminal-investigative organizations to prevent child sexual @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with various governmental and outside entities to improve practices and outcomes related to the prevention of child sexual exploitation ” only have a 3 percent chance of going to where it needs to go ?
The bill has been referred to the Subcommittee on Military Personnel , that ’ s the latest update .
The question that pops into my head , what if members of the subcommittee on Military Personnel is involved in this ?
When it comes to the Department of Defense , stories like this corroborate with a lot of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ policewoman Kathryn Bolkovac , for example , who served as a UN peacekeeper and worked under DynCorp , a military contractor , where she learned about elite-level sex trafficking involving the UN , the State Department , and the Military .
You can read more about her testimony here .
This could be connected to the time when former U.S. representative Cynthia McKinney announced she was well aware of the corruption that was going on within DynCorp , addressing it in 2005 .
She grilled former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ military contractor DynCorp ’ s child trafficking business of selling women and children .
This further corroborates with the story of General James Grazioplene , who worked in the Pentagon and as the Vice President of DynCorp , who is currently facing charges for raping minors as well as incest .
( source ) Based on my research , it ’ s quite clear to me that there is a very large , global network of elite level pedophilia that plagues big money , big politics , big business , and big religion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Europe and and into the Vatican .
But how deep does it go ?
Again , this type of thing has been revealing itself for quite a long time , so we must ask ourselves , why and how does it continue to sustain itself ?
Research eventually led to the Franklin scandal that broke in 1989 when hundreds of children were apparently flown around the US to be abused by high ranking ‘ Establishment ’ members .
Former state senator John W DeCamp , cited as one of the most effective legislators @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for two of the abuse victims .
A 15 year old girl disclosed that she had been abused since the age of 9 and was exposed since the age of 9 and was exposed to ‘ ritual murder ’ of a new born girl , a small boy ( who was subsequently fried and eaten ) and three others .
The Franklin scandal is one of many examples throughout history , but that ’ s a topic for another article .
The point is , in order to be engaged in this type @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have gone through some childhood trauma themselves .
They must be hurting inside , and from our perspective they must lack morality , ethics , and empathy .
To be able to participate in violence , and do things to someone , let alone a small child , against their will is indicative of psychopathic behaviour .
If may of our ‘ leaders ’ and people in positions of great power are involved in this stuff , is it really that surprising that global issues are not being solved and continue to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ acts of war are perpetuated ?
If these people can participate in such activities , just imagine how easy it is for them to participate in corruption within the geopolitical realms , among others .
Perhaps this is why we see so many false stories , lies and deception from big politics and mainstream media ?
At the end of the day , this is important to acknowledge because in order for humanity to move forward , we must see our world for what it is .
Yes , it ’ s breathtaking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a gift , but in order to take care of it we must shine “ light ” into the “ darkness ” and heal it .
We must take control of ourselves and not be made to be reliant on a ‘ higher power ’ to dictate our destiny .
Anneke Lucas is an author , speaker , advocate for child sex trafficking victims , founder of the non-profit organization Liberation Prison Yoga , and creator of the Unconditional Model .
Her work is based off her 30-year journey to restore her mental @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the worst atrocities known to humankind before the age of 12 .
Sold as a young child into a murderous pedophile network by her family , she was rescued after nearly six years of abuse and torture .
We recently conducted an interview with her .
Below is a clip from the four part series , as it was a very long and detailed interview : She was raped 1,700 hours before reaching the age of 12 during horrifying abuse .
Children were scared into silence and members of the network killed those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
At the age of 11 , it was decided she was ‘ of no use anymore ’ and was to be killed .

Within the past couple of years alone millions of people around the world have become aware of the fact that the trafficking of both men, women, as well as children is a big problem.
Just as we see with illegal arms sales, this type of activity seems to operate within the ‘black market’ and has sustained itself for years.
The reason why it seems to continue to sustain itself year after year is simply the fact that many people in positions of power are involved.
In fact, based on my research, many people who are involved in this type of activity around the world are actually the ones we go to in order to combat the problem.
Take Cardinal George Pell as a prime example. Not long ago Pell became the highest ranking Vatican official to ever be convicted of child sexual abuse.
Unfortunately, his conviction was overturned and the tradition of powerful people getting off the hook continues.
It’s disturbing to contemplate the idea that Cardinal George Pell is or would be involved in such things, after all, he himself established the Diocesan Commission Into Sexual Abuse in 1996.
For decades, the Vatican has been facing multiple sexual abuse allegations, this includes Popes as well as many other high ranking Vatican officials throughout.
This type of activity seems to be quite widespread in places of power and unfortunately there are a number of examples, one place where this type of activity seems to be quite rampant is within the Department of Defense.
Not long ago, I wrote about how Congress is now looking at a bipartisan bill to stop employees from sharing child porn on Department of Defense computers.
Where are these kids coming from? Who is making these kids ‘perform,’ who is filming them, and where are these high-ranking people getting this from?
“The notion that the Department of Defense’s network and Pentagon-issued computers may be used to view, create, or circulate such horrifying images is a shameful disgrace, and one we must fight head on.” – Abigail Spanberger (D-Virginia), spoken in a statement on Tuesday as she and co-sponsor Mark Meadows (R-N. Carolina) introduced the End National Defense Network Abuse (END Network Abuse) Act in the House. (source)
As The Hill reports, “The Pentagon’s Defense Criminal Investigative Service subsequently identified hundreds of DOD-affiliated individuals as suspects involved in accessing child pornography, several of whom used government devices to use and share the images.”
It’s called the End National Defense Network Abuse (END Network Abuse) and it was introduced in the wake of an investigation called “Project Flicker” carried out by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
This investigation identified over 5,000 individuals, including many affiliated with DOD, who were subscribed to child porn websites.
So, what’s the update? The update is that it’s most likely this bill will go nowhere. It’s hardly received any attention from media outlets, and it only have a 3 percent chance of being enacted and moving forward
How can a bill that “directs the Department of Defense to establish (1) an initiative to improve the capacity of military criminal-investigative organizations to prevent child sexual exploitation, and (2) partnerships with various governmental and outside entities to improve practices and outcomes related to the prevention of child sexual exploitation” only have a 3 percent chance of going to where it needs to go?
The bill has been referred to the Subcommittee on Military Personnel, that’s the latest update. The question that pops into my head, what if members of the subcommittee on Military Personnel is involved in this?
When it comes to the Department of Defense, stories like this corroborate with a lot of other information out there.
Take ex-Nebraska policewoman Kathryn Bolkovac, for example, who served as a UN peacekeeper and worked under DynCorp, a military contractor, where she learned about elite-level sex trafficking involving the UN, the State Department, and the Military. You can read more about her testimony here.
This could be connected to the time when former U.S. representative Cynthia McKinney announced she was well aware of the corruption that was going on within DynCorp, addressing it in 2005.
She grilled former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld on the government’s involvement and compliance with military contractor DynCorp’s child trafficking business of selling women and children.
This further corroborates with the story of General James Grazioplene, who worked in the Pentagon and as the Vice President of DynCorp, who is currently facing charges for raping minors as well as incest. (source)
Important Points To Consider
Based on my research, it’s quite clear to me that there is a very large, global network of elite level pedophilia that plagues big money, big politics, big business, and big religion. It permeates the Royal Families across Europe and and into the Vatican.
But how deep does it go? Again, this type of thing has been revealing itself for quite a long time, so we must ask ourselves, why and how does it continue to sustain itself?
A paper published in European Psychiatry states:
Research eventually led to the Franklin scandal that broke in 1989 when hundreds of children were apparently flown around the US to be abused by high ranking ‘Establishment’ members.
Former state senator John W DeCamp, cited as one of the most effective legislators in Nebraska history, is today attorney for two of the abuse victims.
A 15 year old girl disclosed that she had been abused since the age of 9 and was exposed since the age of 9 and was exposed to ‘ritual murder’ of a new born girl, a small boy (who was subsequently fried and eaten) and three others.
The Franklin scandal is one of many examples throughout history, but that’s a topic for another article.
The point is, in order to be engaged in this type of activity one must usually have to have gone through some childhood trauma themselves.
They must be hurting inside, and from our perspective they must lack morality, ethics, and empathy. To be able to participate in violence, and do things to someone, let alone a small child, against their will is indicative of psychopathic behaviour.
If may of our ‘leaders’ and people in positions of great power are involved in this stuff, is it really that surprising that global issues are not being solved and continue to be neglected? Is it that surprising that acts of war are perpetuated?
If these people can participate in such activities, just imagine how easy it is for them to participate in corruption within the geopolitical realms, among others.
Perhaps this is why we see so many false stories, lies and deception from big politics and mainstream media?
At the end of the day, this is important to acknowledge because in order for humanity to move forward, we must see our world for what it is.
Yes, it’s breathtaking, beautiful, our mother, and a gift, but in order to take care of it we must shine “light” into the “darkness” and heal it. We must take control of ourselves and not be made to be reliant on a ‘higher power’ to dictate our destiny.
Our Interview With A Child Sex Trafficking Survivor
Anneke Lucas is an author, speaker, advocate for child sex trafficking victims, founder of the non-profit organization Liberation Prison Yoga, and creator of the Unconditional Model.
Her work is based off her 30-year journey to restore her mental and physical wellbeing after surviving some of the worst atrocities known to humankind before the age of 12.
Sold as a young child into a murderous pedophile network by her family, she was rescued after nearly six years of abuse and torture.
We recently conducted an interview with her. Below is a clip from the four part series, as it was a very long and detailed interview:
She was raped 1,700 hours before reaching the age of 12 during horrifying abuse.
Children were scared into silence and members of the network killed those who threatened to go to the police. At the age of 11, it was decided she was ‘of no use anymore’ and was to be killed.
By Arjun Walia, Guest writer


humansarefree--2020-06-19--The System Is Rigged: Qualified Immunity Is How the Police State Stays in Power

“ What ’ s been most striking to me is just how one-sided the rules are when Americans take on their own government… .
It has been dismaying to learn the extent to which rules and laws shield the government from accountability for its abuses — or even lawbreaking… .
It ’ s been a long and frightening lesson… .
The rules seem rigged to protect government lawlessness , and the playing field is uneven .
Too many processes favor the government .
The deck is still stacked.
” — Journalist Sharyl Attkisson The system is rigged , the government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people ” continue to waste our strength by fighting each other rather than standing against the tyrant in our midst .
Because the system is rigged , because the government is corrupt , and because “ we the people ” remain polarized and divided , the police state will keep winning and “ we the people ” will keep losing .
Because the system is rigged and the U.S. Supreme Court — the so-called “ people ’ s court ” — has exchanged its appointed role as a gatekeeper of justice for its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ quo , there will be little if no consequences for the cops who brutalize and no justice for the victims of police brutality .
Because the system is rigged , there will be no consequences for police who destroyed a private home by bombarding it with tear gas grenades during a SWAT team raid gone awry , or for the cop who mistakenly shot a 10-year-old boy after aiming for and missing the non-threatening family dog , or for the arresting officer who sicced a police dog on a suspect who had already @ @ @ @ @ @ @ keep dying at the hands of militarized police .
By refusing to accept any of the eight or so qualified immunity cases before it this term that strove to hold police accountable for official misconduct , the Supreme Court delivered a chilling reminder that in the American police state , ‘ we the people ’ are at the mercy of law enforcement officers who have almost absolute discretion to decide who is a threat , what constitutes resistance , and how harshly they can deal with the citizens they were appointed to ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ qualified immunity keeps the police state in power .
Lawyers tend to offer a lot of complicated , convoluted explanations for the doctrine of qualified immunity , which was intended to insulate government officials from frivolous lawsuits , but the real purpose of qualified immunity is to rig the system , ensuring that abusive agents of the government almost always win and the victims of government abuse almost always lose .
How else do you explain a doctrine that requires victims of police violence to prove that their abusers knew their behavior was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in a nearly identical case at some prior time : it ’ s a setup for failure .
Do you know how many different ways a cop can kill , maim , torture and abuse someone without being held liable ?
The cops know : in large part due to training classes that drill them on the art of sidestepping the Fourth Amendment , which protects us from being bullied , badgered , beaten , broken and spied on by government agents .
This is how “ we the people ” keep losing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Harlow v. Fitzgerald ( 1982 ) that suing government officials for monetary damages is “ the only realistic avenue ” of holding them accountable for abusing their offices and violating the Constitution , it has ostensibly given the police and other government agents a green light to shoot first and ask questions later , as well as to probe , poke , pinch , taser , search , seize , strip and generally manhandle anyone they see fit in almost any circumstance , all with the general blessing of the courts .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ through people ’ s front doors and shooting them dead in their homes or strip searching motorists on the side of the road , these instances of abuse are continually validated by a judicial system that kowtows to virtually every police demand , no matter how unjust , no matter how in opposition to the Constitution .
Make no mistake about it : this is what constitutes “ law and order ” in the American police state .
These are the hallmarks of a police state : where police officers , no longer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ keeping the peace , are part of an elite ruling class dependent on keeping the masses corralled , under control , and treated like suspects and enemies rather than citizens .
Unfortunately , we ’ ve been traveling this dangerous road for a long time now .
A review of critical court rulings over the past several decades , including rulings affirming qualified immunity protections for government agents by the U.S. Supreme Court , reveals a startling and steady trend towards pro-police state rulings by an institution concerned more with establishing order , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government agents from charges of wrongdoing than with upholding the rights enshrined in the Constitution .
Indeed , as Reuters reports , qualified immunity “ has become a nearly failsafe tool to let police brutality go unpunished and deny victims their constitutional rights.
” Worse , as Reuters concluded , “ the Supreme Court has built qualified immunity into an often insurmountable police defense by intervening in cases mostly to favor the police.
” Police can claim qualified immunity for warrantless searches .
In Anderson v. Creighton , the Supreme Court ruled that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ entitled to qualified immunity protections after they were sued for raiding a private home without a warrant and holding family members at gunpoint , all in a search for a suspected bank robber who was not in the house .
Police can claim qualified immunity for warrantless arrests based on mere suspicion .
In Hunter v. Bryant , the Court ruled that police acted reasonably in arresting James Bryant without a warrant in order to protect the president .
Bryant had allegedly written a letter that referenced a third-party plot to assassinate President @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proof that he intended to harm Reagan beyond a mere suspicion .
The charges against Bryant were eventually dropped .
Police can claim qualified immunity for using excessive force against protesters .
In Saucier v. Katz , the Court ruled in favor of federal law enforcement agents who forcefully tackled a protester as he attempted to unfurl a banner at Vice President Gore ’ s political rally .
The Court reasoned that the officers acted reasonably given the urgency of protecting the vice president .
Police can claim qualified immunity for shooting a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Brosseau v. Haugen , the Court dismissed a lawsuit against a police officer who shot Kenneth Haugen in the back as he entered his car in order to flee from police .
The Court ruled that in light of existing case law , the cop ’ s conduct fell in the “ hazy border between excessive and acceptable force ” and so she did not violate clearly established law .
Police can claim qualified immunity for shooting a mentally impaired person .
In City of San Francisco v. Sheehan , the Court ruled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Teresa Sheehan during the course of a mental health welfare check .
The Court ruled that it was not unreasonable for police to pepper spray and shoot Sheehan multiple times after entering her room without a warrant and encountering her holding a knife .
Police officers can use lethal force in car chases without fear of lawsuits .
In Plumhoff v. Rickard , the U.S. Supreme Court declared that police officers who used deadly force to terminate a car chase were immune from a lawsuit .
The officers were accused of needlessly resorting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at a man and his passenger in a stopped car , killing both individuals .
Police can stop , arrest and search citizens without reasonable suspicion or probable cause .
In a 5-3 ruling in Utah v. Strieff , the U.S. Supreme Court effectively gave police the go-ahead to embark on a fishing expedition of one ’ s person and property , rendering Americans completely vulnerable to the whims of any cop on the beat .
Police officers can stop cars based on “ anonymous ” tips or for “ suspicious ” behavior @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or driving too carefully .
In a 5-4 ruling in Navarette v. California , the U.S. Supreme Court declared that police officers , under the guise of “ reasonable suspicion , ” can stop cars and question drivers based solely on anonymous tips , no matter how dubious , and whether or not they themselves witnessed any troubling behavior .
Then in State v. Howard , the Kansas Supreme Court declared that motorists who recline their car seats are guilty of suspicious behavior and can be subject to warrantless searches by police .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ rulings upholding warrantless searches and seizures by police renders one ’ s car a Constitution-free zone .
Americans have no protection against mandatory breathalyzer tests at a police checkpoint , although mandatory blood draws violate the Fourth Amendment ( Birchfield v. North Dakota ) .
Police can also conduct sobriety and “ information-seeking ” checkpoints ( Illinois v. Lidster and Mich. Dep ’ t of State Police v. Sitz ) .
Police can forcibly take your DNA , whether or not you ’ ve been convicted of a crime .
In Maryland v. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ determined that a person arrested for a crime who is supposed to be presumed innocent until proven guilty must submit to forcible extraction of their DNA .
Once again the Court sided with the guardians of the police state over the defenders of individual liberty in determining that DNA samples may be extracted from people arrested for “ serious ” offenses .
The end result of the ruling paves the way for a nationwide dragnet of suspects targeted via DNA sampling .
Police can use the “ fear for my life ” rationale @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Upon arriving on the scene of a nighttime traffic accident , an Alabama police officer shot a driver exiting his car , mistakenly believing the wallet in his hand to be a gun .
A report by the Justice Department found that half of the unarmed people shot by one police department over a seven-year span were “ shot because the officer saw something ( like a cellphone ) or some action ( like a person pulling at the waist of their pants ) and misidentified it as a threat.
” Police @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as “ search warrants on leashes.
” In Florida v. Harris , a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court determined that police officers may use highly unreliable drug-sniffing dogs to conduct warrantless searches of cars during routine traffic stops .
The ruling turns man ’ s best friend into an extension of the police state , provided the use of a K-9 unit takes place within a reasonable amount of time ( Rodriguez v. United States ) .
Not only are police largely protected by qualified immunity , but police dogs are also off the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Court of Appeals ruled in favor of a police officer who allowed a police dog to maul a homeless man innocent of any wrongdoing .
Police can subject Americans to strip searches , no matter the “ offense.
” A divided U.S. Supreme Court actually prioritized making life easier for overworked jail officials over the basic right of Americans to be free from debasing strip searches .
In its 5-4 ruling in Florence v. Burlington , the Court declared that any person who is arrested and processed at a jail house , regardless @ @ @ @ @ @ @ offense ( i.e.
, they can be guilty of nothing more than a minor traffic offense ) , can be subjected to a strip search by police or jail officials , which involves exposing the genitals and the buttocks .
This “ license to probe ” is now being extended to roadside stops , as police officers throughout the country have begun performing roadside strip searches — some involving anal and vaginal probes — without any evidence of wrongdoing and without a warrant .
Police can break into homes without a warrant , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ home .
In an 8-1 ruling in Kentucky v. King , the U.S. Supreme Court placed their trust in the discretion of police officers , rather than in the dictates of the Constitution , when they gave police greater leeway to break into homes or apartments without a warrant .
Despite the fact that the police in question ended up pursuing the wrong suspect , invaded the wrong apartment and violated just about every tenet that stands between us and a police state , the Court sanctioned the warrantless raid , leaving Americans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of all manner of abuses by police .
Police can use knock-and-talk tactics as a means of sidestepping the Fourth Amendment .
Aggressive “ knock and talk ” practices have become thinly veiled , warrantless exercises by which citizens are coerced and intimidated into “ talking ” with heavily armed police who “ knock ” on their doors in the middle of the night .
Andrew Scott didn ’ t even get a chance to say no to such a heavy-handed request before he was gunned down by police who pounded aggressively on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ failed to identify themselves as police , and then repeatedly shot and killed the man when he answered the door while holding a gun in self-defense .
Police can carry out no-knock raids if they believe announcing themselves would be dangerous.Police can perform a “ no-knock ” raid as long as they have a reasonable suspicion that knocking and announcing their presence , under the particular circumstances , would be dangerous or futile or give occupants a chance to destroy evidence of a crime ( Richards v. Wisconsin ) .
Legal ownership of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a no-knock raid by police ( Quinn v. Texas ) .
For instance , a Texas man had his home subject to a no-knock , SWAT-team style forceful entry and raid based solely on the suspicion that there were legally-owned firearms in his household .
The homeowner was actually shot by police through his closed bedroom door .
Police can recklessly open fire on anyone that might be “ armed.
” Philando Castile was shot and killed during a routine traffic stop allegedly over a broken tail light merely for telling police he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s all it took for police to shoot Castile four times in the presence of his girlfriend and her 4-year-old daughter .
A unanimous Supreme Court declared in County of Los Angeles vs. Mendez that police should not be held liable for recklessly firing 15 times into a shack where a homeless couple had been sleeping because the grabbed his BB gun in defense , fearing they were being attacked .
Police can destroy a home during a SWAT raid , even if the owner gives their consent to enter and search it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Supreme Court provided cover to police after they smashed the windows of Shaniz West ’ s home , punched holes in her walls and ceilings , and bombed the house with so much tear gas that it was uninhabitable for two months .
All of this despite the fact that the suspect they were pursuing was not in the house and West , the homeowner , agreed to allow police to search the home to confirm that .
Police can suffocate someone , deliberately or inadvertently , in the process of subduing them @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” has become a rallying cry following the deaths of Eric Garner and George Floyd , both of whom died after being placed in a chokehold by police .
Dozens more have died in similar circumstances at the hands of police who have faced little repercussions for these deaths .
As I make clear in my book Battlefield America : The War on the American People , we are dealing with a nationwide epidemic of court-sanctioned police violence carried out with impunity against individuals posing little or no real threat .
So what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ system that is clearly self-serving and corrupt ?
Abolishing the police is not the answer : that will inevitably lead to outright anarchy , which will give the police state and those law-and-order zealots all the incentive it needs to declare martial law .
Looting and violence are not the answer : As Martin Luther King Jr. recognized , “ A riot merely intensifies the fears of the white community while relieving the guilt.
” Using the looting and riots as justification for supporting police brutality is also not the answer : As @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enough … to condemn riots… without , at the same time , condemning the contingent , intolerable conditions that exist in our society .
These conditions are the things that cause individuals to feel that they have no other alternative than to engage in violent rebellions to get attention .
And I must say tonight that a riot is the language of the unheard .
And what is it America has failed to hear ?
It has failed to hear that the plight of the negro poor has worsened over the last twelve @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to hear that the promises of freedom and justice have not been met .
And it has failed to hear that large segments of white society are more concerned about tranquility and the status quo than about justice and humanity.
” Police reform is necessary and unavoidable if we are to have any hope of living in an America in which freedom means something more than the right to stay alive , but how we reform the system is just as important as getting it done .
We don ’ t need to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ aristocracy who primarily come from privileged backgrounds and who have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo to fix what ’ s broken in America .
Nor do we need to wait for 535 highly paid politicians to do something about these injustices only when it suits their political ambitions And we certainly don ’ t need to wait for a president with a taste for totalitarian tactics to throw a few crumbs our way .
This is as much a local problem as it is a national one .
Be fair @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your pursuit of justice for all .
Let ’ s get it done .
By John W. Whitehead , is an attorney , author and the founder and president of The Rutherford Institute .
His new book Battlefield America : The War on the American People is available at Amazon.com .

“What’s been most striking to me is just how one-sided the rules are when Americans take on their own government…. It has been dismaying to learn the extent to which rules and laws shield the government from accountability for its abuses — or even lawbreaking…. It’s been a long and frightening lesson…. The rules seem rigged to protect government lawlessness, and the playing field is uneven. Too many processes favor the government. The deck is still stacked.” — Journalist Sharyl Attkisson
The system is rigged.
The system is rigged, the government is corrupt, and “we the people” continue to waste our strength by fighting each other rather than standing against the tyrant in our midst.
Because the system is rigged, because the government is corrupt, and because “we the people” remain polarized and divided, the police state will keep winning and “we the people” will keep losing.
Because the system is rigged and the U.S. Supreme Court — the so-called “people’s court” — has exchanged its appointed role as a gatekeeper of justice for its new role as maintainer of the status quo, there will be little if no consequences for the cops who brutalize and no justice for the victims of police brutality.
Because the system is rigged, there will be no consequences for police who destroyed a private home by bombarding it with tear gas grenades during a SWAT team raid gone awry, or for the cop who mistakenly shot a 10-year-old boy after aiming for and missing the non-threatening family dog, or for the arresting officer who sicced a police dog on a suspect who had already surrendered.
This is how unarmed Americans keep dying at the hands of militarized police.
By refusing to accept any of the eight or so qualified immunity cases before it this term that strove to hold police accountable for official misconduct, the Supreme Court delivered a chilling reminder that in the American police state, ‘we the people’ are at the mercy of law enforcement officers who have almost absolute discretion to decide who is a threat, what constitutes resistance, and how harshly they can deal with the citizens they were appointed to ‘serve and protect.”
This is how qualified immunity keeps the police state in power.
Lawyers tend to offer a lot of complicated, convoluted explanations for the doctrine of qualified immunity, which was intended to insulate government officials from frivolous lawsuits, but the real purpose of qualified immunity is to rig the system, ensuring that abusive agents of the government almost always win and the victims of government abuse almost always lose.
How else do you explain a doctrine that requires victims of police violence to prove that their abusers knew their behavior was illegal because it had been deemed so in a nearly identical case at some prior time: it’s a setup for failure.
Do you know how many different ways a cop can kill, maim, torture and abuse someone without being held liable?
The cops know: in large part due to training classes that drill them on the art of sidestepping the Fourth Amendment, which protects us from being bullied, badgered, beaten, broken and spied on by government agents.
This is how “we the people” keep losing.
Although the U.S. Supreme Court recognized in Harlow v. Fitzgerald (1982) that suing government officials for monetary damages is “the only realistic avenue” of holding them accountable for abusing their offices and violating the Constitution, it has ostensibly given the police and other government agents a green light to shoot first and ask questions later, as well as to probe, poke, pinch, taser, search, seize, strip and generally manhandle anyone they see fit in almost any circumstance, all with the general blessing of the courts.
Whether it’s police officers breaking through people’s front doors and shooting them dead in their homes or strip searching motorists on the side of the road, these instances of abuse are continually validated by a judicial system that kowtows to virtually every police demand, no matter how unjust, no matter how in opposition to the Constitution.
Make no mistake about it: this is what constitutes “law and order” in the American police state.
These are the hallmarks of a police state: where police officers, no longer mere servants of the people entrusted with keeping the peace, are part of an elite ruling class dependent on keeping the masses corralled, under control, and treated like suspects and enemies rather than citizens.
Unfortunately, we’ve been traveling this dangerous road for a long time now.
A review of critical court rulings over the past several decades, including rulings affirming qualified immunity protections for government agents by the U.S. Supreme Court, reveals a startling and steady trend towards pro-police state rulings by an institution concerned more with establishing order, protecting the ruling class, and insulating government agents from charges of wrongdoing than with upholding the rights enshrined in the Constitution.
Indeed, as Reuters reports, qualified immunity “has become a nearly failsafe tool to let police brutality go unpunished and deny victims their constitutional rights.” Worse, as Reuters concluded, “the Supreme Court has built qualified immunity into an often insurmountable police defense by intervening in cases mostly to favor the police.”
The system is rigged.
Police can claim qualified immunity for warrantless searches. In Anderson v. Creighton, the Supreme Court ruled that FBI and state law enforcement agents were entitled to qualified immunity protections after they were sued for raiding a private home without a warrant and holding family members at gunpoint, all in a search for a suspected bank robber who was not in the house.
Police can claim qualified immunity for warrantless arrests based on mere suspicion. In Hunter v. Bryant, the Court ruled that police acted reasonably in arresting James Bryant without a warrant in order to protect the president. Bryant had allegedly written a letter that referenced a third-party plot to assassinate President Ronald Reagan, but police had no proof that he intended to harm Reagan beyond a mere suspicion. The charges against Bryant were eventually dropped.
Police can claim qualified immunity for using excessive force against protesters. In Saucier v. Katz, the Court ruled in favor of federal law enforcement agents who forcefully tackled a protester as he attempted to unfurl a banner at Vice President Gore’s political rally. The Court reasoned that the officers acted reasonably given the urgency of protecting the vice president.
Police can claim qualified immunity for shooting a fleeing suspect in the back. In Brosseau v. Haugen, the Court dismissed a lawsuit against a police officer who shot Kenneth Haugen in the back as he entered his car in order to flee from police. The Court ruled that in light of existing case law, the cop’s conduct fell in the “hazy border between excessive and acceptable force” and so she did not violate clearly established law.
Police can claim qualified immunity for shooting a mentally impaired person. In City of San Francisco v. Sheehan, the Court ruled in favor of police who repeatedly shot Teresa Sheehan during the course of a mental health welfare check. The Court ruled that it was not unreasonable for police to pepper spray and shoot Sheehan multiple times after entering her room without a warrant and encountering her holding a knife.
Police officers can use lethal force in car chases without fear of lawsuits. In Plumhoff v. Rickard, the U.S. Supreme Court declared that police officers who used deadly force to terminate a car chase were immune from a lawsuit. The officers were accused of needlessly resorting to deadly force by shooting multiple times at a man and his passenger in a stopped car, killing both individuals.
Police can stop, arrest and search citizens without reasonable suspicion or probable cause. In a 5-3 ruling in Utah v. Strieff, the U.S. Supreme Court effectively gave police the go-ahead to embark on a fishing expedition of one’s person and property, rendering Americans completely vulnerable to the whims of any cop on the beat.
Police officers can stop cars based on “anonymous” tips or for “suspicious” behavior such as having a reclined car seat or driving too carefully. In a 5-4 ruling in Navarette v. California, the U.S. Supreme Court declared that police officers, under the guise of “reasonable suspicion,” can stop cars and question drivers based solely on anonymous tips, no matter how dubious, and whether or not they themselves witnessed any troubling behavior.
Then in State v. Howard, the Kansas Supreme Court declared that motorists who recline their car seats are guilty of suspicious behavior and can be subject to warrantless searches by police. That ruling, coupled with other court rulings upholding warrantless searches and seizures by police renders one’s car a Constitution-free zone.
Americans have no protection against mandatory breathalyzer tests at a police checkpoint, although mandatory blood draws violate the Fourth Amendment (Birchfield v. North Dakota). Police can also conduct sobriety and “information-seeking” checkpoints (Illinois v. Lidster and Mich. Dep’t of State Police v. Sitz).
Police can forcibly take your DNA, whether or not you’ve been convicted of a crime. In Maryland v. King, a divided U.S. Supreme Court determined that a person arrested for a crime who is supposed to be presumed innocent until proven guilty must submit to forcible extraction of their DNA.
Once again the Court sided with the guardians of the police state over the defenders of individual liberty in determining that DNA samples may be extracted from people arrested for “serious” offenses. The end result of the ruling paves the way for a nationwide dragnet of suspects targeted via DNA sampling.
Police can use the “fear for my life” rationale as an excuse for shooting unarmed individuals. Upon arriving on the scene of a nighttime traffic accident, an Alabama police officer shot a driver exiting his car, mistakenly believing the wallet in his hand to be a gun.
A report by the Justice Department found that half of the unarmed people shot by one police department over a seven-year span were “shot because the officer saw something (like a cellphone) or some action (like a person pulling at the waist of their pants) and misidentified it as a threat.”
Police have free reign to use drug-sniffing dogs as “search warrants on leashes.” In Florida v. Harris, a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court determined that police officers may use highly unreliable drug-sniffing dogs to conduct warrantless searches of cars during routine traffic stops.
The ruling turns man’s best friend into an extension of the police state, provided the use of a K-9 unit takes place within a reasonable amount of time (Rodriguez v. United States).
Not only are police largely protected by qualified immunity, but police dogs are also off the hook for wrongdoing. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of a police officer who allowed a police dog to maul a homeless man innocent of any wrongdoing.
Police can subject Americans to strip searches, no matter the “offense.” A divided U.S. Supreme Court actually prioritized making life easier for overworked jail officials over the basic right of Americans to be free from debasing strip searches.
In its 5-4 ruling in Florence v. Burlington, the Court declared that any person who is arrested and processed at a jail house, regardless of the severity of his or her offense (i.e., they can be guilty of nothing more than a minor traffic offense), can be subjected to a strip search by police or jail officials, which involves exposing the genitals and the buttocks.
This “license to probe” is now being extended to roadside stops, as police officers throughout the country have begun performing roadside strip searches — some involving anal and vaginal probes — without any evidence of wrongdoing and without a warrant.
Police can break into homes without a warrant, even if it’s the wrong home. In an 8-1 ruling in Kentucky v. King, the U.S. Supreme Court placed their trust in the discretion of police officers, rather than in the dictates of the Constitution, when they gave police greater leeway to break into homes or apartments without a warrant.
Despite the fact that the police in question ended up pursuing the wrong suspect, invaded the wrong apartment and violated just about every tenet that stands between us and a police state, the Court sanctioned the warrantless raid, leaving Americans with little real protection in the face of all manner of abuses by police.
Police can use knock-and-talk tactics as a means of sidestepping the Fourth Amendment. Aggressive “knock and talk” practices have become thinly veiled, warrantless exercises by which citizens are coerced and intimidated into “talking” with heavily armed police who “knock” on their doors in the middle of the night.
Andrew Scott didn’t even get a chance to say no to such a heavy-handed request before he was gunned down by police who pounded aggressively on the wrong door at 1:30 a.m., failed to identify themselves as police, and then repeatedly shot and killed the man when he answered the door while holding a gun in self-defense.
Police can carry out no-knock raids if they believe announcing themselves would be dangerous.Police can perform a “no-knock” raid as long as they have a reasonable suspicion that knocking and announcing their presence, under the particular circumstances, would be dangerous or futile or give occupants a chance to destroy evidence of a crime (Richards v. Wisconsin).
Legal ownership of a firearm is also enough to justify a no-knock raid by police (Quinn v. Texas). For instance, a Texas man had his home subject to a no-knock, SWAT-team style forceful entry and raid based solely on the suspicion that there were legally-owned firearms in his household. The homeowner was actually shot by police through his closed bedroom door.
Police can recklessly open fire on anyone that might be “armed.” Philando Castile was shot and killed during a routine traffic stop allegedly over a broken tail light merely for telling police he had a conceal-and-carry permit. That’s all it took for police to shoot Castile four times in the presence of his girlfriend and her 4-year-old daughter.
A unanimous Supreme Court declared in County of Los Angeles vs. Mendez that police should not be held liable for recklessly firing 15 times into a shack where a homeless couple had been sleeping because the grabbed his BB gun in defense, fearing they were being attacked.
Police can destroy a home during a SWAT raid, even if the owner gives their consent to enter and search it. In West v. Winfield, the Supreme Court provided cover to police after they smashed the windows of Shaniz West’s home, punched holes in her walls and ceilings, and bombed the house with so much tear gas that it was uninhabitable for two months. All of this despite the fact that the suspect they were pursuing was not in the house and West, the homeowner, agreed to allow police to search the home to confirm that.
Police can suffocate someone, deliberately or inadvertently, in the process of subduing them. “I can’t breathe” has become a rallying cry following the deaths of Eric Garner and George Floyd, both of whom died after being placed in a chokehold by police. Dozens more have died in similar circumstances at the hands of police who have faced little repercussions for these deaths.
As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, we are dealing with a nationwide epidemic of court-sanctioned police violence carried out with impunity against individuals posing little or no real threat.
So what’s the answer to reforming a system that is clearly self-serving and corrupt?
Abolishing the police is not the answer: that will inevitably lead to outright anarchy, which will give the police state and those law-and-order zealots all the incentive it needs to declare martial law.
Looting and violence are not the answer: As Martin Luther King Jr. recognized, “A riot merely intensifies the fears of the white community while relieving the guilt.” Using the looting and riots as justification for supporting police brutality is also not the answer:
As King recognized, “It is not enough … to condemn riots… without, at the same time, condemning the contingent, intolerable conditions that exist in our society. These conditions are the things that cause individuals to feel that they have no other alternative than to engage in violent rebellions to get attention. And I must say tonight that a riot is the language of the unheard.
And what is it America has failed to hear?
It has failed to hear that the plight of the negro poor has worsened over the last twelve or fifteen years. It has failed to hear that the promises of freedom and justice have not been met. And it has failed to hear that large segments of white society are more concerned about tranquility and the status quo than about justice and humanity.”
Police reform is necessary and unavoidable if we are to have any hope of living in an America in which freedom means something more than the right to stay alive, but how we reform the system is just as important as getting it done.
We don’t need to wait for nine members of a ruling aristocracy who primarily come from privileged backgrounds and who have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo to fix what’s broken in America.
Nor do we need to wait for 535 highly paid politicians to do something about these injustices only when it suits their political ambitions
And we certainly don’t need to wait for a president with a taste for totalitarian tactics to throw a few crumbs our way.
This is as much a local problem as it is a national one.
Be fair. Be nonviolent. Be relentless in your pursuit of justice for all.
Let’s get it done.
By John W. Whitehead, is an attorney, author and the founder and president of The Rutherford Institute. His new book Battlefield America: The War on the American People is available at Amazon.com.


humansarefree--2020-06-19--Aborted Fetal Tissue in Vaccines: Babies Are Born ALIVE at 5-6 Months Old with Beating Hearts and No

Aborted Fetal Tissue in Vaccines: Babies Are Born ALIVE at 5-6 Months Old with Beating Hearts and No Anesthesia

This is a very important interview between Robert F. Kennedy , Jr. and Dr. Theresa Deisher regarding the use of human fetal tissue to culture viruses for vaccines , because Dr. Deisher reveals that human DNA fragments are found in vaccines .
Most of the COVID vaccines being developed are using human fetal tissue to culture the coronavirus .
One of the more interesting questions Mr. Kennedy asked Dr. Deisher was why the manufacturers of vaccines switched from exclusively using animal tissue to culture viruses for vaccines , to start using aborted fetal tissue some years back .
Dr. Deisher @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we getting a lot of pressure from the animal rights movement to stop using animals for experimentation .
It ’ s kind of weird to think that the animal rights activists have more clout with the vaccine companies than do the anti-abortion activists .
They do .
And you know what ’ s really alarming is the lack of outcry over human babies born alive at five to six months old so that their hearts can be obtained beating .
And they have to be beating to be used in the research that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ heart has stopped beating , it ’ s not useful .
You can not use it .
And so these babies are delivered alive , and their hearts cut out without anesthesia .
I wouldn ’ t do that to a mouse… .
On June 15th , Robert F. Kennedy , Jr. interviewed the founder and president of Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute , Dr. Theresa Deisher , on the use of aborted fetal tissue in vaccines .
Mr. Kennedy and Dr. Deisher covered a wide range of topics including which vaccines contain human @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tells us in terms of health risks , and what alternatives might be used in place of human DNA in vaccines .
WHO Obliterated All Arguments For Vaccines Or Contact Tracing : Asymptomatic Carriers Don ’ t Spread COVID-19 Dr. Deisher is a genetic engineer with over 20 years experience in the pharmaceutical industry , from basic human biology through clinical trials .
Dr. Deisher obtained her Ph.D. in Molecular and Cellular Physiology from Stanford University and has spent over 20 years in commercial biotechnology .
Prior to founding AVM Biotechnology and Sound @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she worked with leading biotechnology companies , including Genentech , Repligen , ZymoGenetics , Immunex and Amgen .
Dr. Deisher is an inventor on 23 issued U.S. patents , and her discoveries have led to clinical trials of FGF18 for osteoarthritis and cartilage repair , and for Factor XIII for surgical bleeding .
Dr. Deisher was the first person to discover adult cardiac derived stem cells , and has been a champion of adult stem cell research , both professionally and privately , for two decades .
Dr. Deisher was a plaintiff in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of federal tax payer dollars for embryo destructive research , which was instrumental in steering science towards adult stem cell research , which has led to 14 U.S. FDA approved adult stem cell products and the Washington Post Dec 2013 headline “ Scientists Go Ethical in 2013.
” AVM Biotechnology is the marquee prolife biotech company worldwide , certifying that it does not use morally illicit material in any process .
SCPI ’ s mission is to end human trafficking in biomedical research .
Members Of Brazil ’ s Parliament Broke Into Hospital @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 200 Dead From COVID19 – The Hospital Was EMPTY

This is a very important interview between Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Dr. Theresa Deisher regarding the use of human fetal tissue to culture viruses for jjabs, because Dr. Deisher reveals that human DNA fragments are found in jjabs.
Most of the COVID jjabs being developed are using human fetal tissue to culture the coronavirus.
One of the more interesting questions Mr. Kennedy asked Dr. Deisher was why the manufacturers of jjabs switched from exclusively using animal tissue to culture viruses for jjabs, to start using aborted fetal tissue some years back.
Dr. Deisher’s reply was that the industry we getting a lot of pressure from the animal rights movement to stop using animals for experimentation.
Mr. Kennedy was shocked, and stated:
It’s kind of weird to think that the animal rights activists have more clout with the jjab companies than do the anti-abortion activists.
Dr. Deisher replied:
They do. And you know what’s really alarming is the lack of outcry over human babies born alive at five to six months old so that their hearts can be obtained beating. And they have to be beating to be used in the research that’s being done.
If the heart has stopped beating, it’s not useful. You cannot use it.
And so these babies are delivered alive, and their hearts cut out without anesthesia.
I wouldn’t do that to a mouse….
by Children’s Health Defense
On June 15th, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. interviewed the founder and president of Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute, Dr. Theresa Deisher, on the use of aborted fetal tissue in jjabs.
Mr. Kennedy and Dr. Deisher covered a wide range of topics including which jjabs contain human fetal tissue, what the existing research tells us in terms of health risks, and what alternatives might be used in place of human DNA in jjabs.
WHO Obliterated All Arguments For Vaccines Or Contact Tracing: Asymptomatic Carriers Don’t Spread COVID-19
Dr. Deisher is a genetic engineer with over 20 years experience in the pharmaceutical industry, from basic human biology through clinical trials.
Dr. Deisher obtained her Ph.D. in Molecular and Cellular Physiology from Stanford University and has spent over 20 years in commercial biotechnology.
Prior to founding AVM Biotechnology and Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute (SCPI), she worked with leading biotechnology companies, including Genentech, Repligen, ZymoGenetics, Immunex and Amgen.
Dr. Deisher is an inventor on 23 issued U.S. patents, and her discoveries have led to clinical trials of FGF18 for osteoarthritis and cartilage repair, and for Factor XIII for surgical bleeding.
Dr. Deisher was the first person to discover adult cardiac derived stem cells, and has been a champion of adult stem cell research, both professionally and privately, for two decades.
Dr. Deisher was a plaintiff in the U.S. federal lawsuit to prohibit use of federal tax payer dollars for embryo destructive research, which was instrumental in steering science towards adult stem cell research, which has led to 14 U.S. FDA approved adult stem cell products and the Washington Post Dec 2013 headline “Scientists Go Ethical in 2013.”
AVM Biotechnology is the marquee prolife biotech company worldwide, certifying that it does not use morally illicit material in any process. SCPI’s mission is to end human trafficking in biomedical research.
Members Of Brazil’s Parliament Broke Into Hospital That Claimed To Have 5,000 Infected & 200 Dead From COVID19 – The Hospital Was EMPTY
Reference: MedicalKidnap.com


humansarefree--2020-06-19--Tennessee Lawmakers Ban Abortion Procedures After Six Weeks

( Reuters ) – Tennessee lawmakers passed one of the tightest abortion restrictions in the country on Friday , banning the procedure once a fetal heartbeat is detected at around six weeks , which is often before a woman realizes she is pregnant .
The “ heartbeat ” bill follows a wave of similar strict anti-abortion measures passed by Republican-majority legislatures in an effort to prompt the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade , the landmark 1973 case that guarantees a woman ’ s constitutional right to abortion .
In the last two years , federal judges have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ banning abortion after six weeks in Iowa , Kentucky , Ohio , Mississippi and Georgia , on the grounds that they were unconstitutional .
Tennessee Governor Bill Lee , a Republican , applauded the passage of the bill , saying in a Twitter post on Friday it is “ the strongest pro-life law in our state ’ s history.
” The governor must sign the legislation for it to take effect .
The bill makes it a felony for health providers to perform abortions after six weeks .
It makes exceptions for life-saving @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but does not exempt cases of rape or incest .

(Reuters) – Tennessee lawmakers passed one of the tightest abortion restrictions in the country on Friday, banning the procedure once a fetal heartbeat is detected at around six weeks, which is often before a woman realizes she is pregnant.
The “heartbeat” bill follows a wave of similar strict anti-abortion measures passed by Republican-majority legislatures in an effort to prompt the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 case that guarantees a woman’s constitutional right to abortion.
In the last two years, federal judges have struck down “fetal heartbeat” laws banning abortion after six weeks in Iowa, Kentucky, Ohio, Mississippi and Georgia, on the grounds that they were unconstitutional.
Tennessee Governor Bill Lee, a Republican, applauded the passage of the bill, saying in a Twitter post on Friday it is “the strongest pro-life law in our state’s history.”
The governor must sign the legislation for it to take effect.
The bill makes it a felony for health providers to perform abortions after six weeks. It makes exceptions for life-saving abortions performed prior to six weeks, but does not exempt cases of rape or incest.


humansarefree--2020-06-19--Sky Tags Numerous Movies With Political Correctness Trigger Warning

As part of the ongoing hysterical meltdown in the aftermath of Black Lives Matter protests , broadcaster Sky has tagged numerous movies , some little over a decade old , with a message warning viewers that they might be offensive .
Twitter user @ godblesstoto compiled a thread of the movies affected , which includes Tropic Thunder , a film that was only made 12 years ago .
“ This film has outdated attitudes , language and cultural depictions which may cause offence today , ” states the trigger warning .
Aliens , the Goonies , Flash Gordon , Breakfast @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also been tagged .
Classics like Aladdin have also received the same treatment .
Numerous movies and television shows are now being screened with trigger warnings or removed from on-demand services altogether .
As we previously highlighted , PBS removed Gone With the Wind from its platform , in the process erasing the first black female actress to win an Oscar .
Earlier this month , the BBC also announced it was removing Little Britain from its schedule despite the fact that the TV comedy series satirizes every demographic , often highlighting small @ @ @ @ @ @ @ corporations have caved to a demented , woke mob , every piece of art , music or TV show must be run through a 2020 purity test to ensure it pleases the sensibilities of a noisy minority .
This will ensure yet another round of censorship as more content is removed to satiate the digital book burners .

As part of the ongoing hysterical meltdown in the aftermath of Black Lives Matter protests, broadcaster Sky has tagged numerous movies, some little over a decade old, with a message warning viewers that they might be offensive.
Twitter user @godblesstoto compiled a thread of the movies affected, which includes Tropic Thunder, a film that was only made 12 years ago.
“This film has outdated attitudes, language and cultural depictions which may cause offence today,” states the trigger warning.
Aliens, the Goonies, Flash Gordon, Breakfast at Tiffany’s and others have also been tagged.
Classics like Aladdin have also received the same treatment.
Public now being warned that movies made in 2019 have ‘outdated attitudes’. Corporate Britain has lost the plot. Best ignored until they get a grip again. pic.twitter.com/saL9ZEgUMa — Michael Heaver (@Michael_Heaver) June 19, 2020
Numerous movies and television shows are now being screened with trigger warnings or removed from on-demand services altogether.
As we previously highlighted, PBS removed Gone With the Wind from its platform, in the process erasing the first black female actress to win an Oscar.
Earlier this month, the BBC also announced it was removing Little Britain from its schedule despite the fact that the TV comedy series satirizes every demographic, often highlighting small minded attitudes of bigots.
Now that corporations have caved to a demented, woke mob, every piece of art, music or TV show must be run through a 2020 purity test to ensure it pleases the sensibilities of a noisy minority.
This will ensure yet another round of censorship as more content is removed to satiate the digital book burners.
Reference: Summit.news


humansarefree--2020-06-19--400+ Medical Professionals Sign Letter to Oppose Further Expansion of Wireless and 5G

The Federal Communications Commission ( FCC ) – NOT a health or environmental agency – is supposed to protect Americans by regulating the telecom industry .
They have a LONG history of doing just the opposite ( see 1 , 2 ) .
Their guidelines are embarrassingly outdated and don ’ t apply to how most of us use or are exposed to cell phone and wireless radiation today .
There is still NO “ safe ” level of exposure that has been scientifically determined for pregnant women or children !
Yet they REFUSE to update their guidelines despite ALL @ @ @ @ @ @ @ already been filed against the agency for NOT protecting the public from unsafe levels of radiation ( see 1 , 2 ) as well as 5G .
An increasing number of federal agencies and elected officials are very unhappy with their actions ( see 1 , 2 ) .
None of this seems to matter to the them ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ) .
One commissioner has even referred to their opponents as “ Tin Foil Hat ” @ @

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) – NOT a health or environmental agency – is supposed to protect Americans by regulating the telecom industry. They have a LONG history of doing just the opposite (see 1, 2).
Their guidelines are embarrassingly outdated and don’t apply to how most of us use or are exposed to cell phone and wireless radiation today.
There is still NO “safe” level of exposure that has been scientifically determined for pregnant women or children! Yet they REFUSE to update their guidelines despite ALL the research proving harm.
Lawsuits have already been filed against the agency for NOT protecting the public from unsafe levels of radiation (see 1, 2) as well as 5G.
An increasing number of federal agencies and elected officials are very unhappy with their actions (see 1, 2). None of this seems to matter to the them (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9). One commissioner has even referred to their opponents as “Tin Foil Hat” people.