humansarefree--2020-05-14--Bill Gates’ Control Over Education and the “Mainstream” Media

As Americans increasingly look at Bill Gates and his global agenda , today we republish an article from September of 2016 by Adam Johnson of FAIR , Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting .
FAIR describes themselves as “ challenging corporate media bias , spin and misinformation.
” From their website : “ We work to invigorate the First Amendment by advocating for greater diversity in the press and by scrutinizing media practices that marginalize public interest , minority and dissenting viewpoints .
We expose neglected news stories and defend working journalists when they are muzzled.
” Johnson ’ s article @ @ @ @ @ @ @ influences education in poor countries , and how he also influences the corporate media in the U.S. , including Prime Time TV dramas .
Thanks to investigative reporter Jon Rappoport for pointing out this article from 2016 .
This Guardian Piece Touting Bill Gates ’ Education Investment Brought to You by Bill Gates The Guardian ( 8/31/16 ) published a broadly positive report on Liberian education , which is handing over the reins of 120 primary schools to a consortium of private education companies and NGOs in a pilot program exploring privatization of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
One passage in particular was especially glowing : “ The deputy minister [ of Education ] , Aagon Tingba , is reading The Bee Eater , a biography of Michele Rhee , a polarizing educational reformist and former chancellor of Washington , DC , public schools .
“ She changed the lives of children in Washington , but people complained her methods were controversial .
But she made a difference .
So why can ’ t we do that here ?
” What the piece failed to note—other than the fact that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s schools “ worse by almost every conceivable measure ” ( Truthout , 10/23/13 ) —is that multi-billionaire Bill Gates is both the major investor of the company administering the Liberian education overhaul and the principal of the Gates Foundation , sponsor of the Guardian ’ s Global Development vertical , where the story appeared .
The story clearly labels the Gates Foundation as its sponsor .
What it never mentioned is that Bill Gates is a major investor of the firm at the heart of the story , Bridge Academies International , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mark Zuckerberg and eBay co-founder Pierre Omidyar , $ 100 million for the “ education startup.
” Making the conflict more glaring is the fact that this is a personal , for-profit investment for Gates , not a charitable donation .
The Guardian claims its Global Development vertical , launched in 2011 , is “ editorially independent of any sponsorship.
” According to its most recent tax filings in 2014 , the Gates Foundation has an on-going $ 5.69 million grant to Guardian News Media Limited .
The Guardian has run other puff @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vertical , such as “ Gates Foundation Annual Letter : What Do You Think of Their Vision ?
” ( 1/22/15 ) , which is basically an investment letter , along with “ Melinda Gates Hits Out at ‘ War on Women ’ on Eve of Summit ” ( 7/7/12 ) and “ Bill Gates : Digital Learning Will Revolutionize Education in Global South ” ( 1/22/15 ) .
FAIR has written for years about how Gates ’ investment tentacles influence the media .
He ’ s done softball interviews pushing common core @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bankroll charter school reporting at the LA Times ( 8/24/15 ) , funded the talking heads behind Race to the Top ( 9/1/10 ) .
The Gates Foundation gives grants in the hundreds of thousands and often millions to such media organizations as NBCUniversal , Al Jazeera , BBC , Viacom ( CBS ) and Participant Media ( the producer of pro-charter school documentary Waiting for Superman ) .
Both Gates and the Gates Foundation are sizable shareholders in Comcast , which is the primary investor in Buzzfeed and Vox , as well @ @ @ @ @ @ @ News – the latter of which teamed up with Gates and other noted education experts like Exxon and University of Phoenix Online for the week-long charter school commercial “ Education Week ” .
In 2009 , the New York Times reported that the Gates Foundation was partnering with media companies to write and shape stories to “ embed ” messages in primetime dramas : “ It is less well known as a behind-the-scenes influencer of public attitudes toward these issues by helping to shape story lines and insert messages into popular entertainment like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Order : SVU and Private Practice .
The foundation ’ s messages on HIV prevention , surgical safety and the spread of infectious diseases have found their way into these shows.
” The Times report was solely in the context of Gates ’ health initiatives ; it ’ s not clear if the foundation also co-produced TV shows to advance its school privatization agenda .
FAIR reached out to the writer of the piece , Nadene Ghouri , asking why she did not disclose the glaring conflict of interest .
At the time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our request for comment .
His enormous wealth and the reach of media parent corporations seem to exempt Gates from routine disclosure requirements .
He was offered up as an education expert in the pro-charter Waiting for Superman , without any mention of the fact that he donated at least $ 2 million to the film and had a media partnership with its distributor , Viacom .
He is given softball interviews in Comcast-backed Vox without disclosure that he ’ s a major Comcastinvestor .
Because his stake in media companies is laundered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not to merit mention .
In the case of the Guardian , Gates effectively owns an entire vertical , so when one of his investments is written up , one doesn ’ t notice the conflict of interest—like a fish doesn ’ t notice water .
Because his influence is everywhere , it appears to be nowhere .

As Americans increasingly look at Billy Boy and his global agenda, today we republish an article from September of 2016 by Adam Johnson of FAIR, Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting.
FAIR describes themselves as “challenging corporate media bias, spin and misinformation.” From their website:
“We work to invigorate the First Amendment by advocating for greater diversity in the press and by scrutinizing media practices that marginalize public interest, minority and dissenting viewpoints. We expose neglected news stories and defend working journalists when they are muzzled.”
Johnson’s article looks at how Billy Boy sponsors and influences education in poor countries, and how he also influences the corporate media in the U.S., including Prime Time TV dramas.
Thanks to investigative reporter Jon Rappoport for pointing out this article from 2016.
This Guardian Piece Touting Billy Boy’ Education Investment Brought to You by Billy Boy
by Adam Johnson
The Guardian (8/31/16) published a broadly positive report on Liberian education, which is handing over the reins of 120 primary schools to a consortium of private education companies and NGOs in a pilot program exploring privatization of the West African nation’s schools. One passage in particular was especially glowing:
“The deputy minister [of Education], Aagon Tingba, is reading The Bee Eater, a biography of Michele Rhee, a polarizing educational reformist and former chancellor of Washington, DC, public schools. “She changed the lives of children in Washington, but people complained her methods were controversial. But she made a difference. So why can’t we do that here?”
What the piece failed to note—other than the fact that Rhee’s tenure left DC’s schools “worse by almost every conceivable measure” (Truthout, 10/23/13)—is that multi-billionaire Billy Boy is both the major investor of the company administering the Liberian education overhaul and the principal of the Gates Foundation, sponsor of the Guardian’s Global Development vertical, where the story appeared.
The story clearly labels the Gates Foundation as its sponsor. What it never mentioned is that Billy Boy is a major investor of the firm at the heart of the story, Bridge Academies International, having pitched in, along with Facebookco-founder Mark Zuckerberg and eBay co-founder Pierre Omidyar, $100 million for the “education startup.”
Making the conflict more glaring is the fact that this is a personal, for-profit investment for Gates, not a charitable donation.
The Guardian claims its Global Development vertical, launched in 2011, is “editorially independent of any sponsorship.” According to its most recent tax filings in 2014, the Gates Foundation has an on-going $5.69 million grant to Guardian News Media Limited.
The Guardian has run other puff pieces on the Gates Foundation in this vertical, such as “Gates Foundation Annual Letter: What Do You Think of Their Vision?” (1/22/15), which is basically an investment letter, along with “Melinda Gates Hits Out at ‘War on Women’ on Eve of Summit” (7/7/12) and “Billy Boy: Digital Learning Will Revolutionize Education in Global South” (1/22/15).
FAIR has written for years about how Gates’ investment tentacles influence the media. He’s done softball interviews pushing common core with ABC (3/18/14), helped bankroll charter school reporting at the LA Times (8/24/15), funded the talking heads behind Race to the Top (9/1/10).
The Gates Foundation gives grants in the hundreds of thousands and often millions to such media organizations as NBCUniversal, Al Jazeera, BBC, Viacom (CBS) and Participant Media (the producer of pro-charter school documentary Waiting for Superman). Both Gates and the Gates Foundation are sizable shareholders in Comcast, which is the primary investor in Buzzfeed and Vox, as well the parent corporation of MSNBC and NBC News – the latter of which teamed up with Gates and other noted education experts like Exxon and University of Phoenix Online for the week-long charter school commercial “Education Week”.
In 2009, the New York Times reported that the Gates Foundation was partnering with media companies to write and shape stories to “embed” messages in primetime dramas:
“It is less well known as a behind-the-scenes influencer of public attitudes toward these issues by helping to shape story lines and insert messages into popular entertainment like the television shows ER, Law & Order: SVU and Private Practice. The foundation’s messages on HIV prevention, surgical safety and the spread of infectious diseases have found their way into these shows.”
The Times report was solely in the context of Gates’ health initiatives; it’s not clear if the foundation also co-produced TV shows to advance its school privatization agenda.
FAIR reached out to the writer of the piece, Nadene Ghouri, asking why she did not disclose the glaring conflict of interest. At the time of publication, Ghouri has not returned our request for comment.
His enormous wealth and the reach of media parent corporations seem to exempt Gates from routine disclosure requirements. He was offered up as an education expert in the pro-charter Waiting for Superman, without any mention of the fact that he donated at least $2 million to the film and had a media partnership with its distributor, Viacom. He is given softball interviews in Comcast-backed Vox without disclosure that he’s a major Comcastinvestor. Because his stake in media companies is laundered enough times, it’s assumed not to merit mention.
In the case of the Guardian, Gates effectively owns an entire vertical, so when one of his investments is written up, one doesn’t notice the conflict of interest—like a fish doesn’t notice water. Because his influence is everywhere, it appears to be nowhere.
Sources: Healthimpactnews.com; FAIR.org


humansarefree--2020-05-14--Melinda Gates Appears on Today Show Pushing Hard for a Global Vaccine While Wearing an Upside-Down C

Melinda Gates Appears on Today Show Pushing Hard for a Global Vaccine While Wearing an Upside-Down Cross

TODAY ’ s Savannah Guthrie spoke exclusively to Melinda Gates , who is working to address the pandemic through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation .
She says there are “ a few good candidates ” for a vaccine and that the U.S. needs “ to start looking at a paid medical leave policy ” to help workers on the front lines .
She also criticizes the Trump administration for its response to the crisis : “ We haven ’ t had leadership at the national level … it ’ s chaos.
” This while wearing a very odd looking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Melinda Gates in an interview on TODAY Show pushing hard for a global COVID-19 vaccine was wearing a bright and shiny upside-down cross around her neck .
Symbolism is very important to groups like the Illuminati , the New World Order and others , as they love to flash you signs of how much smarter they are than you and I are .
We are ruled by a satanic death cult who is obsessed with symbolism .
Besides Melinda Gates ’ inverted cross , here ’ s 2 more examples of satanic symbolism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ family and the upcoming ‘ mark of the beast ’ vaccine : 1 .
An Enzyme Called LUCIFERASE is What Makes Bill Gates Implantable Vaccine Work 2 .
Microsoft Funds ID2020 And Files Patent For Device Attached To The Human Body For Buying And Selling Bitcoin – Patent # 666 They like to put their true agenda right in our faces , and dare us to figure it out .
Take a quick trip to our Predictive Programming section , and you will see immediately what we ’ re talking about .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the TODAY Show did with Melinda Gates back on November 8th , where we see Melinda wearing an upside-down , or inverted , cross around her neck .
Who likes to wear inverted crosses ?
Satanists , pagans , witches , warlocks , New Agers , most people in Hollywood … you get the idea .
“ Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law , being made a curse for us : for it is written , Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree : ” Galatians 3:13 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Christians never used the cross as a sign or symbol for anything , why ?
Because it was the instrument of the torturous death of Jesus of Nazareth .
The cross as iconic symbolism would not appear until biblical Christianity was hijacked by the Romans around 325 AD .
From that point on you see crosses on everything as Rome infused paganism with Christianity .
The bible tells us that the cross is the sign of a curse , and cursed people hang on them .
No one in their right minds who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a curse hanging around their own necks , much less wearing an upside-down cross like the pagans / satanists do .
I will let you make up your own mind as to why Melinda Gates chose to wear an upside-down cross on national television .
I know she went to Catholic school , and that she and Bill have raised their children as Catholics .
But when you look at the millions of dollars they give to Planned Parenthood , an organization that exists to slaughter children in the womb , exactly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a little murky , to say the least .
The Roman Catholic Church , what I like to call counterfeit Christianity , loves weird occult and pagan symbolism .
Over the years we ’ ve shown you the Vatican Audience Hall that is shaped exactly like a giant snake , and has the freakiest , most nastiest-looking statue right behind here the pope sits .
[ It ’ s also worth mentioning that the pope ’ s throne has a massive inverted cross on it . ]
Occult symbolism pervades the Vatican to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a Catholic , you do the math .
Melinda Gates on pandemic : ‘ We haven ’ t had leadership at the national level … it ’ s chaos ’ FROM TODAY : As part of our coronavirus series The Search for Solutions , TODAY ’ s Savannah Guthrie spoke exclusively to Melinda Gates , who is working to address the pandemic through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation .
She says there are “ a few good candidates ” for a vaccine and that the U.S. needs “ to start looking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to help workers on the front lines .
She also criticizes the Trump administration for its response to the crisis : “ We haven ’ t had leadership at the national level … it ’ s chaos.
” ( Read more ) I will include the top comments just incase they decide to close the comments section :

by Lance D Johnson
The World Health Organization (WHO) is facilitating a global health dictatorship, commanding all member states to enforce totalitarian lock downs and far-reaching medical edicts that empower government authorities and the jjab industry – not human health.
WHO’s authoritarian recommendations were adopted in rapid fashion by almost every government on Earth.
The behavioral controls and livelihood restrictions imposed by WHO have no basis in immune system health, mental health, or general well being.
WHO operates like a global oligarchy, forcing all member states to carry out their orders. In 2020 and beyond, WHO has ordered populations into isolation, avoidance, and unlawful quarantines.
WHO has forced perpetual oxygen restrictions, coercive DNA harvesting, and mRNA jjabs experiments, while instructing governments around the world to quash civil liberties and promote medical martial law.
This dictatorship is giving rise to a medical apartheid – a system of segregation that punishes healthy people for not complying.
Billy Boy Vaccine Alliance is the source of terror behind WHO’s lock downs and coercive jjab passports
Where is WHO coming up with these restrictive medical edicts and coercive jjab policies? According to WHO insider Astrid Stuckelberger, Ph.D., WHO serves the financial interests of GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance run by Billy Boy.
GAVI was formed in 2000 and set up as an international institution in Switzerland. GAVI operates tax free and enjoys blanket immunity against criminal sanctions.
Billy Boy leveraged GAVI and bought his influence into the WHO. He even asked to become a member state in 2017, with the privilege of being on WHO’s executive board.
Billy Boy now controls Swissmedic, the FDA of Switzerland, due to a three-way jjab distribution contract agreement reached by Gates, WHO, and the Swiss regulatory agency.
By controlling WHO, Gates funnels tens of billions of dollars through his GAVI Vaccine Alliance, with the ultimate power of controlling member states.
As the controller of information and the arbiter of science, Gates and the jjab industry has the power to suppress prophylactics, treatments, phytonutrients, adaptogens, and antivirals.
Billy Boy and GAVI is the source of terror behind WHO, the lock downs, restrictions, and authoritarian medical edicts that are compelling vaccination experiments.
WHO insider, Astrid Stuckelberger came clean about WHO’s political motivations and how the science is manipulated and leveraged to force populations to comply with jjab experiments.
Stuckelberger is an international expert who evaluates scientific research and advises policymakers.
She has written more than 180 scientific articles, policy papers and governmental reports. She admits that this research is conducted to support political agendas and to justify government policy.
Since 2009, she managed WHO’s international health regulations, which were primarily used to prepare member states to act in unison during a future pandemic. At the center of this world government plandemic is Billy Boy and the GAVI Vaccine Alliance.
GAVI and WHO control governments around the world now, threaten populations
Billy Boy has more power and influence over WHO than entire nations. The United Nations originally established WHO, but has repeatedly refused to rein in their dictatorial powers, illegal quarantine procedures, coercive jjab passports, and undemocratic power grabs.
Justus Hoffmann, Ph.D., one of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee members, pointed out that GAVI has no political power but enjoys “qualified diplomatic immunity.”
GAVI is immune from all criminal business dealing, as well, whether their potential criminal actions are intentional or inadvertent.
“They can do whatever they want,” Stuckelberger confirmed, and they answer to no authority. No law enforcement is allowed to investigate GAVI, even if the Vaccine Alliance was implicated in a criminal conspiracy to defraud or coerce people.
“Stuckelberger, who worked four years on the ethics committee for the WHO, said its “disturbing” that GAVI enjoys blanket immunity especially when GAVI is “directing, as a corporate entity, the WHO.”
The director general of WHO forces all member states to follow GAVI’s orders, from the type of diagnostic tests, to the type of treatments allowed, to top-down populations controls, pandemic messaging, and most importantly, jjab experimentation.
The WHO has been set up over the years to assume dictatorial power over world governments and GAVI is the source of their authoritarianism, terror, and coercive vaccination push.
After months of using high cycle PCR tests to diagnose covid-19, the WHO finally alerted the world in January of 2021 that these tests were producing mostly false positives all along.
As laboratories dial back the cycle threshold on the PCR tests, the official number of covid cases and deaths will slowly dissipate.
This medical fraud will not stop the wave of hospital dependence, ventilator-associated pneumonia, lung infections, stress induced heart disease, drug overdoses, severe mental illness, and jjab injury that is now taking hold of the world.
References: LifeSiteNews.com; GAVI.org; HumansAreFree.com


humansarefree--2020-05-15--President Trump Says He Will Mobilize Military To Distribute COVID-19 Vaccine

President Donald Trump just announced that he believes a Coronavirus vaccine will be ready by the end of the year @ @ @ @ @ ready trump intends to deploy the military to distribute the vaccine on a mass scale @ @ @ @ @ country .
This comes on the heels of learning that several states plan to deploy @ @ @ @ @ in their Contact Tracing programs .
President Trump ’ s Operation Warp Speed has a @ @ @ @ @ doses of a vaccine against COVID-19 available by November , 200 million by December and @ @ @ @ @ .
In this report we also cover a $ 138 million contract with ApiJect Systems @ @ @ @ @ ” and “ RAPID USA , ” which together will dramatically expand U.S. production capability @ @ @ @ @ injection devices starting by October 2020 .

While there are certainly some outlandish claims based on complete nonsense made by those who oppose vaccinations as well as the rabid pro-vaxxers, there are very real reasons to advocate for informed consent and jjab safety.
No one here at TFTP is telling anyone what to do in regard to vaccinations. We are however, advocating for safety at all levels of this process.
Nevertheless, those who promote jjab safety are increasingly being treated as outcasts and lawmakers and media alike are calling for them to be silenced.
There are now renewed efforts by many in the government and medical institutions to quash the chatter when it comes to talking about the safety of the COVID-19 jjab.
The most recent call for censorship comes from Francesco Rocca, president of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies.
In a virtual briefing to the U.N. Correspondents Association, Rocca called for a government and institution-sponsored push to combat “fake news” about COVID-19 jjabs, calling skepticism over the jab “a second pandemic.”
Rocca clearly stated that “to beat this pandemic, we also have to defeat the parallel pandemic of distrust.”
As the AP reported, he said there is “a growing hesitancy about jjabs in general, and about a COVID jjab in particular” around the world, pointing to a recent Johns Hopkins University study in 67 countries that found jjab acceptance declined significantly in most countries from July to October this year.
Rocca correctly stated that skeptics of the safety of the jjab are not just in Western countries and, in fact, concerns come from all around the globe.
“We believe that the massive, coordinated efforts that will be needed to roll out the COVID jjab in an equitable manner need to be paralleled by equally massive efforts to proactively build and maintain trust,” Rocca said.
“Massive efforts to proactively build and maintain trust” is double speak for ‘censor those who don’t unquestioningly line up to receive a jjab that was developed with no long-term studies and in record time.’
While those who don’t blindly trust a fast-tracked jjab are being labelled as kooks and anti-vaxxers, the reality is that these jjab manufacturers and their government enablers have given us every reason in the world not to trust them.
“In several African countries, we have seen a common skepticism towards jjabs in general, with a common belief being that foreigners use Africa as a medical ‘testing ground,’” Rocca told the UN, dismissing Big Pharma’s history in Africa.
Skepticism from Africans is most assuredly warranted. Pfizer, one of the lead manufacturers of the COVID-19 jjab, that the UK will start distributing this week, has a history in Africa of testing drugs on unsuspecting people.
In 2000 the Washington Post published a major exposé accusing Pfizer of testing a dangerous new antibiotic called Trovan on children in Nigeria without receiving proper consent from their parents.
The experiment occurred during a 1996 meningitis epidemic in the country. In 2001 Pfizer was sued in U.S. federal court by thirty Nigerian families, who accused the company of using their children as human guinea pigs.
In 2006 a panel of Nigerian medical experts concluded that Pfizer had violated international law. In 2009 the company agreed to pay $75 million to settle some of the lawsuits that had been brought in Nigerian courts. The U.S. case was settled in 2011 for an undisclosed amount.
BREAKING! Ex-Pfizer Chief Science Officer: COVID-19 Vaccine Can Make Females Infertile
Classified U.S. State Department cables made public in 2010 by Wikileaks indicated that Pfizer had hired investigators to dig up dirt on Nigeria’s former attorney general as a way to get leverage in one of the remaining cases.
Pfizer had to apologize over the revelation in the cables that it had falsely claimed that the group Doctors Without Borders was also dispensing Trovan during the Nigerian meningitis epidemic.
Are we supposed to forget the track record of this company who deliberately misled regulators about the hazards of their products, knowingly contributing to the deaths of more than 125 people? Or who experimented on children? Or who has paid out hundreds of millions in settlements for the deaths of scores of patients?
The fact is that Pfizer is one of many companies developing or who has developed a COVID-19 jjab with track records that include bribing government officials to illegally testing products on children to making false claims about drugs and illegally marketing them.
These companies include Johnson & Johnson, whose penalty total on Violation Tracker is $4.2 billion, AstraZeneca ($1.1 billion), GlaxoSmithKline ($4.4 billion) and Sanofi ($641 million).
The track record of these companies, coupled with the incredibly fast development even has staunchly pro-jjab health care workers worried.
As TFTP reported last week, because they work on the front lines, healthcare workers are eligible to skip to the front of the line to receive the jab. However, despite assurances from jjab makers and their revolving door friends in the Food and Drug Administration, many of these front line workers are leery of this rushed product.
Should they all be silenced too?
While attempting to fact check completely false information about jjabs is one thing, the idea that government, media, and institutions should launch a coordinated effort to censor those who simply advocate for safety, is chilling.
Questioning potential solutions and vigorously testing them is the very foundation of sound science. When one side gets to silence the other, however, this process can no longer be referred to as science but rather a scientific dictatorship.


humansarefree--2020-05-15--Contact Tracing Program Handed to Soros and Clinton-Linked NGO with Questionable Past

A new contact tracing program was recently unveiled in Massachusetts in partnership with Partners in Health , an NGO with links to US regime change operations , big pharma and the Clinton Foundation .
Last week , the State of Massachusetts began implementing a contact tracing program in partnership with a Boston-based organization with ties to the biggest names in big pharma : the George Soros ’ Open Society and the Clinton Foundation .
Those ties go back decades and include U.S. intelligence assets and regime-change operations in Haiti including Operation Uphold Democracy , in which American troops invaded the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CIA-sponsored coup against Jean-Bertrand Aristide .
In April , Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker announced the partnership , called the COVID-19 Community Tracing Collaborative , with Partners in Health ( PIH ) , a non-profit organization with highly questionable patronage and an even more dubious history .
The program will be led by PIH ’ s chief medical officer , Dr. Joia Mukherjee , who described the goals of the contact tracing initiative as well as some of the authorities granted to PIH by the state of Massachusetts to NPR , such as making @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ability , the space , the food needed , the employment , the money to safely quarantine ” and assigning social service assistants in case they fail to meet the necessary criteria .
The disturbing implications are clear .
But , just in case it escaped any NPR listeners , Dr. Mukherjee made it abundantly clear when she tried to assuage the concerns of a Massachusetts contact tracer about parents who might be “ infecting their children.
” Mukherjee assures listeners that PIH will be there to help families who “ can not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The Massachusetts state website has published a guide and overview of the program , containing cursory insight about the protocols contact tracers and contacted homes are to follow and it reads like something out of the 1985 dystopian sci-fi thriller “ Brazil.
” The process begins with a phone call in which you are asked for “ a list of all of the people you were within six feet of during the two days before you had symptoms.
” It then states that contacted people are free to report anyone else they believe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , asking for their phone numbers “ so they can be called and cared for.
” But who is Partners in Health , besides a Boston-based 501 ( c ) 3 non-profit founded by a few “ ordinary people with an extraordinary ambition ” ?
A look into its background uncovers a dark history intricately linked to the 1994 American invasion of Haiti called “ Operation Uphold Democracy , ” an operation Mintpress touched on in coverage of the attempted deportation of CIA-backed war criminal , Emmanuel “ Toto ” Constant .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ States Army Military Intelligence lieutenant about the NGO ’ s origins , the author relates that then 23-year Paul Farmer – one of the five founders of Partners in Health – “ clearly considered himself a champion of human rights.
” The telling passage describes how the young doctor-to-be challenges a U.S. Army captain about the release of a local sheriff named Nerva Juste .
Farmer wanted Juste in U.S. custody , arguing that “ preventative detention ” was necessary in a country that had “ no functioning legal system.
” As Farmer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proper strategy , his future co-founder was also in Haiti and barley 18 years of age .
Ophelia Dahl , the daughter of renowned British novelist and intelligence officer serving as a liaison between Churchill and FDR , had arrived in Haiti as a “ volunteer working with an ophthalmic organization with some handicapped children in Port au Prince.
” Dahl eventually met Farmer and later formed PIH with their other very “ ordinary ” founding partners : Jim Yong Kim , the twelfth president of the World Bank , Tom White , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Todd McCormack , corporate VP of a “ sports , fashion and events powerhouse ” that would later be purchased by business magnate Ari Emanuel in 2014 .
Emanuel ’ s two brothers , Rahm and Ezequiel “ Zeke ” Emanuel are , of course , intimately tied to the Clintons , with Rahm serving in the same White House as Hillary Clinton under Barack Obama and Zeke Emanuel , a medical anthropologist just like Paul Farmer , widely considered to be the “ architect ” of the Affordable Care Act ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be strong at PIH as evidenced by one of their most well-known board members : Chelsea Clinton .
The “ ophthalmic organization ” Dahl cites was an American NGO run by the sixth bishop of Upper South Carolina of the ( EDUSC ) , Rev .
William A. Beckham , in partnership with local Haitian cleric , Father Fritz Lafontant .
Farmer and Dahl met at one of the NGO ’ s many healthcare-centered missions that had gotten underway just two years earlier .
The Episcopal church organized “ medical trips ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Haiti and began financing engineering projects in the community to provide clean water .
Later , a Clemson University program called CEDC ( Clemson Engineers For Developing Countries ) partnered with the EDUSC and continues to work in concert with them and Partners in Health after its founding in 1987 .
The relationship between Farmer and the Clinton Foundation spans decades .
PIH has “ worked with the Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership ( CGEP ) to stimulate entrepreneurship for smallholder farmers in Haiti , ” in addition to similar projects “ throughout Africa @ @ @ @ @ @ @ organization has even built clinics on the Island in partnership with the Clinton Global Initiative .
With such an intimate connection revolving around the Clinton Foundation ’ s healthcare projects , it should come as no surprise that PIH ’ s biggest donors and partners feature some of the largest pharmaceutical corporations currently set to profit from the COVID-19 pandemic , including Eli Lilly and Co. , Johnson & Johnson and Pfizer among many more .
Also found on the list of foundation partners , both public and private , are the Bill @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Development Bank , USAID , WHO , GE , IBM and a host of others .
The George Soros ’ s Open Society Institute donated $ 3 million to PIH for a “ community-based program ” in Africa back in 2007 and in 2014 , Soros donated another $ 4 million to PIH to build an Ebola-treatment center in Liberia , Africa .
The Liberian project was anchored by a “ coalition ” put together by PIH-founder , Jim Yong Kim , which included Director-General of the WHO , Margaret Chan , CDC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Director of the National Institute for Health , who claimed to have been motivated to start the project by a collective dismay over “ the global response ” .
The contact tracing program being rolled out in Massachusetts by PIH is , logically , informed by the many years the organization has been practicing their healthcare engagement methods throughout the world , and in particular Haiti and developing African nations .
Following a pattern used when the first policing innovations were tested out by U.S. military forces in the Philippines at the turn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mechanisms are now being imported stateside after being thoroughly tested elsewhere .
PIH , and founder Paul Farmer in particular , understand exactly how to bring about “ sustainable health systems ” as he claims PIH has done in places like Guinea , Liberia , and Sierra Leone .
Oddly , in a post published on the Open Society website , Farmer appears to be opposed to quarantine , conceding that doing so “ slows the flow of food and labor ” and can “ touch off longer , more complex health crises.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ African farmers , the same principle surely holds for even the most advanced economies like the United States .
Paul Farmer is a complex fellow .
Kidder , in his PIH biopic , “ Mountains Beyond Mountains , ” claims the Farmer not only chided a U.S. military captain about his operational choices , but also pointed out that he found it unacceptable that “ a high official of the junta ” had received training at the infamous School of the Americas .
The author never makes clear what context Farmer was speaking @ @

A new contact tracing program was recently unveiled in Massachusetts in partnership with Partners in Health, an NGO with links to US regime change operations, big pharma and the Clinton Foundation.
by Raul Diego
Last week, the State of Massachusetts began implementing a contact tracing program in partnership with a Boston-based organization with ties to the biggest names in big pharma: the George Soros’ Open Society and the Clinton Foundation.
Those ties go back decades and include U.S. intelligence assets and regime-change operations in Haiti including Operation Uphold Democracy, in which American troops invaded the Caribbean nation to clean up after the CIA-sponsored coup against Jean-Bertrand Aristide.
In April, Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker announced the partnership, called the COVID-19 Community Tracing Collaborative, with Partners in Health (PIH), a non-profit organization with highly questionable patronage and an even more dubious history.
The program will be led by PIH’s chief medical officer, Dr. Joia Mukherjee, who described the goals of the contact tracing initiative as well as some of the authorities granted to PIH by the state of Massachusetts to NPR, such as making assessments about whether families have “the ability, the space, the food needed, the employment, the money to safely quarantine” and assigning social service assistants in case they fail to meet the necessary criteria.
The disturbing implications are clear. But, just in case it escaped any NPR listeners, Dr. Mukherjee made it abundantly clear when she tried to assuage the concerns of a Massachusetts contact tracer about parents who might be “infecting their children.”
Mukherjee assures listeners that PIH will be there to help families who “cannot separate themselves from their children easily.”
The Massachusetts state website has published a guide and overview of the program, containing cursory insight about the protocols contact tracers and contacted homes are to follow and it reads like something out of the 1985 dystopian sci-fi thriller “Brazil.”
The process begins with a phone call in which you are asked for “a list of all of the people you were within six feet of during the two days before you had symptoms.”
It then states that contacted people are free to report anyone else they believe should have a visit from the PIH, asking for their phone numbers “so they can be called and cared for.”
But who is Partners in Health, besides a Boston-based 501(c)3 non-profit founded by a few “ordinary people with an extraordinary ambition”?
A look into its background uncovers a dark history intricately linked to the 1994 American invasion of Haiti called “Operation Uphold Democracy,” an operation Mintpress touched on in coverage of the attempted deportation of CIA-backed war criminal, Emmanuel “Toto” Constant.
Unsavory links to unsavory people
In a book written by a former United States Army Military Intelligence lieutenant about the NGO’s origins, the author relates that then 23-year Paul Farmer – one of the five founders of Partners in Health – “clearly considered himself a champion of human rights.”
The telling passage describes how the young doctor-to-be challenges a U.S. Army captain about the release of a local sheriff named Nerva Juste.
Farmer wanted Juste in U.S. custody, arguing that “preventative detention” was necessary in a country that had “no functioning legal system.”
As Farmer was somehow advising U.S. military personnel on proper strategy, his future co-founder was also in Haiti and barley 18 years of age.
Ophelia Dahl, the daughter of renowned British novelist and intelligence officer serving as a liaison between Churchill and FDR, had arrived in Haiti as a “volunteer working with an ophthalmic organization with some handicapped children in Port au Prince.”
Dahl eventually met Farmer and later formed PIH with their other very “ordinary” founding partners: Jim Yong Kim, the twelfth president of the World Bank, Tom White, Boston’s “greatest philanthropist” and Todd McCormack, corporate VP of a “sports, fashion and events powerhouse” that would later be purchased by business magnate Ari Emanuel in 2014.
Emanuel’s two brothers, Rahm and Ezequiel “Zeke” Emanuel are, of course, intimately tied to the Clintons, with Rahm serving in the same White House as Hillary Clinton under Barack Obama and Zeke Emanuel, a medical anthropologist just like Paul Farmer, widely considered to be the “architect” of the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
The Clinton nexus appears to be strong at PIH as evidenced by one of their most well-known board members: Chelsea Clinton.
The “ophthalmic organization” Dahl cites was an American NGO run by the sixth bishop of Upper South Carolina of the (EDUSC), Rev. William A. Beckham, in partnership with local Haitian cleric, Father Fritz Lafontant.
Farmer and Dahl met at one of the NGO’s many healthcare-centered missions that had gotten underway just two years earlier.
The Episcopal church organized “medical trips” to the remote village of Cange in Haiti and began financing engineering projects in the community to provide clean water.
Later, a Clemson University program called CEDC (Clemson Engineers For Developing Countries) partnered with the EDUSC and continues to work in concert with them and Partners in Health after its founding in 1987.
Big pharma on board
The relationship between Farmer and the Clinton Foundation spans decades.
PIH has “worked with the Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership (CGEP) to stimulate entrepreneurship for smallholder farmers in Haiti,” in addition to similar projects “throughout Africa, from Liberia to Rwanda.”
The organization has even built clinics on the Island in partnership with the Clinton Global Initiative.
With such an intimate connection revolving around the Clinton Foundation’s healthcare projects, it should come as no surprise that PIH’s biggest donors and partners feature some of the largest pharmaceutical corporations currently set to profit from the COVID-19 pandemic, including Eli Lilly and Co., Johnson & Johnson and Pfizer among many more.
Also found on the list of foundation partners, both public and private, are the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Inter-American Development Bank, USAID, WHO, GE, IBM and a host of others.
The George Soros’s Open Society Institute donated $3 million to PIH for a “community-based program” in Africa back in 2007 and in 2014, Soros donated another $4 million to PIH to build an Ebola-treatment center in Liberia, Africa.
The Liberian project was anchored by a “coalition” put together by PIH-founder, Jim Yong Kim, which included Director-General of the WHO, Margaret Chan, CDC Director Tom Frieden and Francis Collins, Director of the National Institute for Health, who claimed to have been motivated to start the project by a collective dismay over “the global response”.
Taking Boston Harbor
The contact tracing program being rolled out in Massachusetts by PIH is, logically, informed by the many years the organization has been practicing their healthcare engagement methods throughout the world, and in particular Haiti and developing African nations.
Following a pattern used when the first policing innovations were tested out by U.S. military forces in the Philippines at the turn of the twentieth century, social control mechanisms are now being imported stateside after being thoroughly tested elsewhere.
PIH, and founder Paul Farmer in particular, understand exactly how to bring about “sustainable health systems” as he claims PIH has done in places like Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone.
Oddly, in a post published on the Open Society website, Farmer appears to be opposed to quarantine, conceding that doing so “slows the flow of food and labor” and can “touch off longer, more complex health crises.”
While he is referring here to African farmers, the same principle surely holds for even the most advanced economies like the United States.
Paul Farmer is a complex fellow. Kidder, in his PIH biopic, “Mountains Beyond Mountains,” claims the Farmer not only chided a U.S. military captain about his operational choices, but also pointed out that he found it unacceptable that “a high official of the junta” had received training at the infamous School of the Americas. The author never makes clear what context Farmer was speaking in.


humansarefree--2020-05-15--The Worst Is Yet to Come: Contact Tracing, Immunity Cards and Mass Testing

“ The things we were worried would happen are happening.
” —Angus Johnston , professor at the City University of New York No one is safe .
No one is immune .
No one gets spared the anguish , fear and heartache of living under the shadow of an authoritarian police state .
That ’ s the message being broadcast 24/7 with every new piece of government propaganda , every new law that criminalizes otherwise lawful activity , every new policeman on the beat , every new surveillance camera casting a watchful eye , every sensationalist news story that titillates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ detention center built to house troublemakers and other undesirables , every new court ruling that gives government agents a green light to strip and steal and rape and ravage the citizenry , every school that opts to indoctrinate rather than educate , and every new justification for why Americans should comply with the government ’ s attempts to trample the Constitution underfoot .
Yes , COVID-19 has taken a significant toll on the nation emotionally , physically , and economically , but there are still greater dangers on the horizon .
As long @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to allow the government to trample our rights in the so-called name of national security , things will get worse , not better .
Now there ’ s talk of mass testing for COVID-19 antibodies , screening checkpoints , contact tracing , immunity passports to allow those who have recovered from the virus to move around more freely , and snitch tip lines for reporting “ rule breakers ” to the authorities .
If you can ’ t read the writing on the wall , you need to pay better attention .
These @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the war against the COVID-19 virus , but they ’ re only necessary to the police state in its efforts to further undermine the Constitution , extend its control over the populace , and feed its insatiable appetite for ever-greater powers .
Nothing is ever as simple as the government claims it is .
Whatever dangerous practices you allow the government to carry out now — whether it ’ s in the name of national security or protecting America ’ s borders or making America healthy again — rest assured , these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ against you when the government decides to set its sights on you .
The war on drugs turned out to be a war on the American people , waged with SWAT teams and militarized police .
The war on terror turned out to be a war on the American people , waged with warrantless surveillance and indefinite detention .
The war on immigration turned out to be a war on the American people , waged with roving government agents demanding “ papers , please.
” This war on COVID-19 will be yet another @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with all of the surveillance weaponry at the government ’ s disposal : thermal imaging cameras , drones , contact tracing , biometric databases , etc .
So you see , when you talk about empowering government agents to screen the populace in order to control and prevent spread of this virus , what you ’ re really talking about is creating a society in which ID cards , round ups , checkpoints and detention centers become routine weapons used by the government to control and suppress the populace , no matter the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pave the way for a national identification system of epic proportions .
Imagine it : a national classification system that not only categorizes you according to your health status but also allows the government to sort you in a hundred other ways : by gender , orientation , wealth , medical condition , religious beliefs , political viewpoint , legal status , etc.. Are you starting to get the bigger picture yet ?
This is just another wolf in sheep ’ s clothing , a “ show me your papers ” scheme disguised @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The ramifications of such a “ show me your papers ” society in which government officials are empowered to stop individuals , demand they identify themselves , and subject them to patdowns , warrantless screenings , searches , and interrogations are beyond chilling .
By allowing government agents to establish a litmus test for individuals to be able to exit a state of lockdown and engage in commerce , movement and any other right that corresponds to life in a supposedly free society , it lays the groundwork for a society in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at any time to any government worker who demands it for any reason .
Such tactics quickly lead one down a slippery slope that ends with government agents empowered to force anyone and everyone to prove they are in compliance with every statute and regulation on the books .
It used to be that unless police had a reasonable suspicion that a person was guilty of wrongdoing , they had no legal authority to stop the person and require identification .
In other words , “ we the people ” had the right @ @ @ @ @ @ @ without the fear of being questioned by police or forced to identify ourselves .
Unfortunately , in this age of COVID-19 , that unrestricted right to move about freely is being pitted against the government ’ s power to lock down communities at a moment ’ s notice .
And in this tug-of-war between individual freedoms and government power , “ we the people ” have been on the losing end of the deal .
Curiously enough , these COVID-19 restrictions dovetail conveniently with a national timeline for states to comply with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ standards on identity documents such as state drivers ’ licenses , a prelude to this national identification system .
Talk about a perfect storm for bringing about a national ID card , the ultimate human tracking device .
Granted , in the absence of a national ID card , which would make the police state ’ s task of monitoring , tracking and singling out individual suspects far simpler , “ we the people ” are already tracked in a myriad of ways : through our state driver ’ s licenses , Social @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and electronic transactions ; by way of our correspondence and communication devices — email , phone calls and mobile phones ; through chips implanted in our vehicles , identification documents , even our clothing .
Add to this the fact that businesses , schools and other facilities are relying more and more on fingerprints and facial recognition to identify us .
All the while , data companies such as Acxiom are capturing vast caches of personal information to help airports , retailers , police and other government authorities instantly determine whether someone is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be .
This informational glut — used to great advantage by both the government and corporate sectors — has converged into a mandate for “ an internal passport , ” a.k.a.
, a national ID card that would store information as basic as a person ’ s name , birth date and place of birth , as well as private information , including a Social Security number , fingerprint , retinal scan and personal , criminal and financial records .
A federalized , computerized , cross-referenced , databased system of identification policed by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the coffin for privacy ( not to mention a logistical security nightmare that would leave Americans even more vulnerable to every hacker in the cybersphere ) .
Americans have always resisted adopting a national ID card for good reason : it gives the government and its agents the ultimate power to target , track and terrorize the populace according to the government ’ s own nefarious purposes .
National ID card systems have been used before , by other oppressive governments , in the name of national security , invariably with horrifying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the Nazis required all Jews to carry special stamped ID cards for travel within the country .
A prelude to the yellow Star of David badges , these stamped cards were instrumental in identifying Jews for deportation to death camps in Poland .
Author Raul Hilberg summarizes the impact that such a system had on the Jews : “ The whole identification system , with its personal documents , specially assigned names , and conspicuous tagging in public , was a powerful weapon in the hands of the police .
“ First @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that facilitated the enforcement of residence and movement restrictions .
Second , it was an independent control measure in that it enabled the police to pick up any Jew , anywhere , anytime .
Third , and perhaps most important , identification had a paralyzing effect on its victims.
” In South Africa during apartheid , pass books were used to regulate the movement of black citizens and segregate the population .
The Pass Laws Act of 1952 stipulated where , when and for how long a black African could remain in certain @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out entries , which cancelled the permission to remain in an area .
A pass book that did not have a valid entry resulted in the arrest and imprisonment of the bearer .
Identity cards played a crucial role in the genocide of the Tutsis in the central African country of Rwanda .
The assault , carried out by extremist Hutu militia groups , lasted around 100 days and resulted in close to a million deaths .
While the ID cards were not a precondition to the genocide , they were a facilitating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the production of an identity card with the designation “ Tutsi ” spelled a death sentence at any roadblock .
Identity cards have also helped oppressive regimes carry out eliminationist policies such as mass expulsion , forced relocation and group denationalization .
Through the use of identity cards , Ethiopian authorities were able to identify people with Eritrean affiliation during the mass expulsion of 1998 .
The Vietnamese government was able to locate ethnic Chinese more easily during their 1978-79 expulsion .
The USSR used identity cards to force the relocation of ethnic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( 1941 ) , Kamyks and Karachai ( 1943 ) , Crimean Tartars , Meshkhetian Turks , Chechens , Ingush and Balkars ( 1944 ) and ethnic Greeks ( 1949 ) .
And ethnic Vietnamese were identified for group denationalization through identity cards in Cambodia in 1993 , as were the Kurds in Syria in 1962 .
And in the United States , post-9/11 , more than 750 Muslim men were rounded up on the basis of their religion and ethnicity and detained for up to eight months .
Their experiences echo those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 75 years ago following the attack on Pearl Harbor .
Despite a belated apology and monetary issuance by the U.S. government , the U.S. Supreme Court has yet to declare such a practice illegal .
Moreover , laws such as the National Defense Authorization Act ( NDAA ) empower the government to arrest and detain indefinitely anyone they “ suspect ” of being an enemy of the state .
You see , you may be innocent of wrongdoing now , but when the standard for innocence is set by the government , no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be a criminal when it ’ s the government determining what is a crime .
It ’ s no longer a matter of if , but when .
Remember , the police state does not discriminate .
At some point , it will not matter whether your skin is black or yellow or brown or white .
It will not matter whether you ’ re an immigrant or a citizen .
It will not matter whether you ’ re rich or poor .
It won ’ t even matter whether you ’ re @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all , government-issued bullets will kill you just as easily whether you ’ re a law-abiding citizen or a hardened criminal .
Government jails will hold you just as easily whether you ’ ve obeyed every law or broken a dozen .
And whether or not you ’ ve done anything wrong , government agents will treat you like a suspect simply because they have been trained to view and treat everyone like potential criminals .
Eventually , when the police state has turned that final screw and slammed that final door , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government agent — poorly trained , utterly ignorant and dismissive of the Constitution , way too hyped up on the power of their badges , and authorized to detain , search , interrogate , threaten and generally harass anyone they see fit — chooses to single you out for special treatment .
We ’ ve been having this same debate about the perils of government overreach for the past 50-plus years , and still we don ’ t seem to learn , or if we learn , we learn too late .
All @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the government today — warrantless surveillance , stop and frisk searches , SWAT team raids , roadside strip searches , asset forfeiture schemes , private prisons , indefinite detention , militarized police , etc .
— started out as a seemingly well-meaning plan to address some problem in society that needed a little extra help .
Be careful what you wish for : you will get more than you bargained for , especially when the government ’ s involved .
In the case of a national identification system , it might start @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cases in order to “ safely ” re-open the nation , but it will end up as a means of controlling the American people .
For those tempted to justify these draconian measures for whatever reason — for the sake of their health , the economy , or national security — remember , you can ’ t have it both ways .
You can ’ t live in a constitutional republic if you allow the government to act like a police state .
You can ’ t claim to value freedom if you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dictatorship .
You can ’ t expect to have your rights respected if you allow the government to treat whomever it pleases with disrespect and an utter disregard for the rule of law .
As I make clear in my book Battlefield America : The War on the American People , if you ’ re inclined to advance this double standard because you believe you have done nothing wrong and have nothing to hide , beware : there ’ s always a boomerang effect .
By John W. Whitehead , constitutional attorney , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The Rutherford Institute .

“The things we were worried would happen are happening.”—Angus Johnston, professor at the City University of New York
No one is safe.
No one is immune.
No one gets spared the anguish, fear and heartache of living under the shadow of an authoritarian police state.
That’s the message being broadcast 24/7 with every new piece of government propaganda, every new law that criminalizes otherwise lawful activity, every new policeman on the beat, every new surveillance camera casting a watchful eye, every sensationalist news story that titillates and distracts, every new prison or detention center built to house troublemakers and other undesirables, every new court ruling that gives government agents a green light to strip and steal and rape and ravage the citizenry, every school that opts to indoctrinate rather than educate, and every new justification for why Americans should comply with the government’s attempts to trample the Constitution underfoot.
Yes, COVID-19 has taken a significant toll on the nation emotionally, physically, and economically, but there are still greater dangers on the horizon.
As long as “we the people” continue to allow the government to trample our rights in the so-called name of national security, things will get worse, not better.
It’s already worse.
Now there’s talk of mass testing for COVID-19 antibodies, screening checkpoints, contact tracing, immunity passports to allow those who have recovered from the virus to move around more freely, and snitch tip lines for reporting “rule breakers” to the authorities.
If you can’t read the writing on the wall, you need to pay better attention.
These may seem like small, necessary steps in the war against the COVID-19 virus, but they’re only necessary to the police state in its efforts to further undermine the Constitution, extend its control over the populace, and feed its insatiable appetite for ever-greater powers.
Nothing is ever as simple as the government claims it is.
Whatever dangerous practices you allow the government to carry out now — whether it’s in the name of national security or protecting America’s borders or making America healthy again — rest assured, these same practices can and will be used against you when the government decides to set its sights on you.
The war on drugs turned out to be a war on the American people, waged with SWAT teams and militarized police.
The war on terror turned out to be a war on the American people, waged with warrantless surveillance and indefinite detention.
The war on immigration turned out to be a war on the American people, waged with roving government agents demanding “papers, please.”
This war on COVID-19 will be yet another war on the American people, waged with all of the surveillance weaponry at the government’s disposal: thermal imaging cameras, drones, contact tracing, biometric databases, etc.
So you see, when you talk about empowering government agents to screen the populace in order to control and prevent spread of this virus, what you’re really talking about is creating a society in which ID cards, round ups, checkpoints and detention centers become routine weapons used by the government to control and suppress the populace, no matter the threat.
This is also how you pave the way for a national identification system of epic proportions.
Imagine it: a national classification system that not only categorizes you according to your health status but also allows the government to sort you in a hundred other ways: by gender, orientation, wealth, medical condition, religious beliefs, political viewpoint, legal status, etc..
Are you starting to get the bigger picture yet?
This is just another wolf in sheep’s clothing, a “show me your papers” scheme disguised as a means of fighting a virus.
Don’t fall for it.
The ramifications of such a “show me your papers” society in which government officials are empowered to stop individuals, demand they identify themselves, and subject them to patdowns, warrantless screenings, searches, and interrogations are beyond chilling.
By allowing government agents to establish a litmus test for individuals to be able to exit a state of lockdown and engage in commerce, movement and any other right that corresponds to life in a supposedly free society, it lays the groundwork for a society in which you are required to identify yourself at any time to any government worker who demands it for any reason.
Such tactics quickly lead one down a slippery slope that ends with government agents empowered to force anyone and everyone to prove they are in compliance with every statute and regulation on the books.
It used to be that unless police had a reasonable suspicion that a person was guilty of wrongdoing, they had no legal authority to stop the person and require identification. In other words, “we the people” had the right to come and go as we please without the fear of being questioned by police or forced to identify ourselves.
Unfortunately, in this age of COVID-19, that unrestricted right to move about freely is being pitted against the government’s power to lock down communities at a moment’s notice. And in this tug-of-war between individual freedoms and government power, “we the people” have been on the losing end of the deal.
Curiously enough, these COVID-19 restrictions dovetail conveniently with a national timeline for states to comply with the Real ID Act, which imposes federal standards on identity documents such as state drivers’ licenses, a prelude to this national identification system.
Talk about a perfect storm for bringing about a national ID card, the ultimate human tracking device.
Granted, in the absence of a national ID card, which would make the police state’s task of monitoring, tracking and singling out individual suspects far simpler, “we the people” are already tracked in a myriad of ways: through our state driver’s licenses, Social Security numbers, bank accounts, purchases and electronic transactions; by way of our correspondence and communication devices — email, phone calls and mobile phones; through chips implanted in our vehicles, identification documents, even our clothing.
Add to this the fact that businesses, schools and other facilities are relying more and more on fingerprints and facial recognition to identify us. All the while, data companies such as Acxiom are capturing vast caches of personal information to help airports, retailers, police and other government authorities instantly determine whether someone is the person he or she claims to be.
This informational glut — used to great advantage by both the government and corporate sectors — has converged into a mandate for “an internal passport,” a.k.a., a national ID card that would store information as basic as a person’s name, birth date and place of birth, as well as private information, including a Social Security number, fingerprint, retinal scan and personal, criminal and financial records.
A federalized, computerized, cross-referenced, databased system of identification policed by government agents would be the final nail in the coffin for privacy (not to mention a logistical security nightmare that would leave Americans even more vulnerable to every hacker in the cybersphere).
Americans have always resisted adopting a national ID card for good reason: it gives the government and its agents the ultimate power to target, track and terrorize the populace according to the government’s own nefarious purposes.
National ID card systems have been used before, by other oppressive governments, in the name of national security, invariably with horrifying results.
For instance, in Germany, the Nazis required all Jews to carry special stamped ID cards for travel within the country. A prelude to the yellow Star of David badges, these stamped cards were instrumental in identifying Jews for deportation to death camps in Poland.
Author Raul Hilberg summarizes the impact that such a system had on the Jews:
“The whole identification system, with its personal documents, specially assigned names, and conspicuous tagging in public, was a powerful weapon in the hands of the police.
“First, the system was an auxiliary device that facilitated the enforcement of residence and movement restrictions. Second, it was an independent control measure in that it enabled the police to pick up any Jew, anywhere, anytime. Third, and perhaps most important, identification had a paralyzing effect on its victims.”
In South Africa during apartheid, pass books were used to regulate the movement of black citizens and segregate the population. The Pass Laws Act of 1952 stipulated where, when and for how long a black African could remain in certain areas. Any government employee could strike out entries, which cancelled the permission to remain in an area. A pass book that did not have a valid entry resulted in the arrest and imprisonment of the bearer.
Identity cards played a crucial role in the genocide of the Tutsis in the central African country of Rwanda. The assault, carried out by extremist Hutu militia groups, lasted around 100 days and resulted in close to a million deaths. While the ID cards were not a precondition to the genocide, they were a facilitating factor. Once the genocide began, the production of an identity card with the designation “Tutsi” spelled a death sentence at any roadblock.
Identity cards have also helped oppressive regimes carry out eliminationist policies such as mass expulsion, forced relocation and group denationalization. Through the use of identity cards, Ethiopian authorities were able to identify people with Eritrean affiliation during the mass expulsion of 1998. The Vietnamese government was able to locate ethnic Chinese more easily during their 1978-79 expulsion.
The USSR used identity cards to force the relocation of ethnic Koreans (1937), Volga Germans (1941), Kamyks and Karachai (1943), Crimean Tartars, Meshkhetian Turks, Chechens, Ingush and Balkars (1944) and ethnic Greeks (1949). And ethnic Vietnamese were identified for group denationalization through identity cards in Cambodia in 1993, as were the Kurds in Syria in 1962.
And in the United States, post-9/11, more than 750 Muslim men were rounded up on the basis of their religion and ethnicity and detained for up to eight months. Their experiences echo those of 120,000 Japanese-Americans who were similarly detained 75 years ago following the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Despite a belated apology and monetary issuance by the U.S. government, the U.S. Supreme Court has yet to declare such a practice illegal. Moreover, laws such as the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) empower the government to arrest and detain indefinitely anyone they “suspect” of being an enemy of the state.
You see, you may be innocent of wrongdoing now, but when the standard for innocence is set by the government, no one is safe.
Everyone is a suspect.
And anyone can be a criminal when it’s the government determining what is a crime.
It’s no longer a matter of if, but when.
Remember, the police state does not discriminate.
At some point, it will not matter whether your skin is black or yellow or brown or white. It will not matter whether you’re an immigrant or a citizen. It will not matter whether you’re rich or poor. It won’t even matter whether you’re driving, flying or walking.
After all, government-issued bullets will kill you just as easily whether you’re a law-abiding citizen or a hardened criminal. Government jails will hold you just as easily whether you’ve obeyed every law or broken a dozen. And whether or not you’ve done anything wrong, government agents will treat you like a suspect simply because they have been trained to view and treat everyone like potential criminals.
Eventually, when the police state has turned that final screw and slammed that final door, all that will matter is whether some government agent — poorly trained, utterly ignorant and dismissive of the Constitution, way too hyped up on the power of their badges, and authorized to detain, search, interrogate, threaten and generally harass anyone they see fit — chooses to single you out for special treatment.
We’ve been having this same debate about the perils of government overreach for the past 50-plus years, and still we don’t seem to learn, or if we learn, we learn too late.
All of the excessive, abusive tactics employed by the government today — warrantless surveillance, stop and frisk searches, SWAT team raids, roadside strip searches, asset forfeiture schemes, private prisons, indefinite detention, militarized police, etc. — started out as a seemingly well-meaning plan to address some problem in society that needed a little extra help.
Be careful what you wish for: you will get more than you bargained for, especially when the government’s involved.
In the case of a national identification system, it might start off as a means of tracking COVID-19 cases in order to “safely” re-open the nation, but it will end up as a means of controlling the American people.
For those tempted to justify these draconian measures for whatever reason — for the sake of their health, the economy, or national security — remember, you can’t have it both ways.
You can’t live in a constitutional republic if you allow the government to act like a police state.
You can’t claim to value freedom if you allow the government to operate like a dictatorship.
You can’t expect to have your rights respected if you allow the government to treat whomever it pleases with disrespect and an utter disregard for the rule of law.
As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, if you’re inclined to advance this double standard because you believe you have done nothing wrong and have nothing to hide, beware: there’s always a boomerang effect.
By John W. Whitehead, constitutional attorney, author and the founder and president of The Rutherford Institute.


humansarefree--2020-05-15--Bill Gates and Rockefeller Foundation Plan to Track Americans

Bill Gates — who illegally invests in the same industries he gives charitable donations to , and who promotes a global public health agenda that benefits the companies he ’ s invested in — has gone on record saying life will not go back to normal until we have the ability to vaccinate the entire global population against COVID-19.1 To that end , he is pushing for disease surveillance and a vaccine tracking system2 that might involve embedding vaccination records on our bodies .
One example of how this might be done is using an invisible ink quantum dot tattoo @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2019 , Science Translational Medicine paper.3,4 According to statements made by Gates , societal and financial normalcy may never return to those who refuse vaccination , as the digital vaccination certificate Gates is pushing for might ultimately be required to go about your day-to-day life and business .
Without this “ digital immunity proof , ” you may not even be allowed to travel locally or visit certain public buildings .
Gates has a history of “ predicting ” global pandemics with vast numbers of deaths,5 and with his call for a tracking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and vaccinated/ unvaccinated individuals , he ’ s ensuring an unimaginably profitable future for the vaccine makers he supports and makes money from via his Foundation investments .
Along with Gates , The Rockefeller Foundation is also coordinating efforts in the direction of social control through the implementation of draconian COVID-19 tracking and tracing measures that are clearly meant to become permanent .
April 21 , 2020 , The Rockefeller Foundation released a white paper6 titled , “ National COVID-19 Testing Action Plan — Strategic Steps to Reopen Our Workplaces and Our Communities.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ineffective nationally-coordinated response , insufficient data , and inadequate amounts of protective gear and testing , we need an exit plan .
Testing is our way out of this crisis .
Instead of ricocheting between an unsustainable shutdown and a dangerous , uncertain return to normalcy , the United States must mount a sustainable strategy with better tests and contact tracing , and stay the course for as long as it takes to develop a vaccine or cure .
Any plan to do so must win the faith of private and public sector @ @ @ @ @ @ @ individual Americans that they and their loved ones will be safer when we begin to return to daily life .
The Rockefeller Foundation exists to meet moments like this .
In the past two weeks we have brought together experts and leaders from science , industry , academia , public policy , and government — across sectors and political ideologies — to create a clear , pragmatic , data-driven , actionable plan to beat back Covid-19 and get Americans back to work more safely.
” The plan calls for testing and tracing 1 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ incrementally ramping it up to 3 million and then 30 million per week ( the “ 1-3-30 plan ” ) over the next six months until the entire population has been covered .
Test results would then be collected on a digital platform capable of tracking all tested individuals so that contact-tracing can be performed when someone tests positive .
According to the “ National COVID-19 Testing Action Plan ” : “ Policy makers and the public must find the balance between privacy concerns and infection control to allow the infection status of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in a few required settings and many voluntary ones.
” To this end , they suggest using incentives “ to nudge the voluntary use ” of tracking and contact tracing apps rather than making them mandatory .
They also call for the use of “ innovative digital technologies ” aimed at improving “ workforce monitoring and early detection of recurrent outbreaks.
” “ When integrated into national and state surveillance systems , such innovations may enable the same level of outbreak detection with fewer tests .
Promising techniques include anonymous digital tracking of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thermometer trends ; continually updated epidemiological data modeling ; and artificial intelligence projections based on clinical and imaging data , ” the document states.7 According to the “ National COVID-19 Testing Action Plan ” :8 “ Monitoring the pandemic and adjusting social distancing measures will require launching the largest public health testing program in American history … “ The effort will ultimately grow to billions of dollars per month … But with widespread business closures costing the country $ 350 billion to $ 400 billion each month , the expense will be worth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ intended to tide the country over until a vaccine or therapy is widely available .
“ Coordination of such a massive program should be treated as a wartime effort , with a public/ private bipartisan Pandemic Testing Board established to assist and serve as a bridge between local , state , and federal officials with the logistical , investment and political challenges this operation will inevitably face.
” Call me jaded , but this sounds like a plan to surveil Americans so that they can easily be tracked down for mandatory vaccination once @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also creates the necessary infrastructure for vaccination tracking across the board , for all vaccines .
While they give lip-service to privacy and anonymization of data , privacy promises have been repeatedly broken in the past .
Besides , the document clearly states that:9 “ Some privacy concerns must be set aside for an infectious agent as virulent as Covid-19 , allowing the infection status of most Americans to be accessed and validated in a few required settings and many voluntary ones .
The loss of privacy engendered by such a system would @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if the arrival of a vaccine early next year was a certainty .
But vaccine development and manufacture could take years , and when it comes certain populations may be excluded from receiving it for health reasons .
In the meantime , infection status must be known for people to participate in many societal functions .
Legislation protecting people from being fired over infection status must be passed .
Those screened must be given a unique patient identification number that would link to information about a patient ’ s viral , antibody and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could easily handshake with other systems to speed the return of normal societal functions .
Schools could link this to attendance lists , large office buildings to employee ID cards , TSA to passenger lists and concert and sports venues to ticket purchasers .
Such connections should be made in a way that protects personally identifying information whenever possible … Whenever and wherever possible data should be open.
” Are You Ready to Give Up EVERYTHING Over a Flu Virus ?
“ Privacy concerns must be set aside.
” Infection status must be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ required settings.
” Infection status will be linked to schools , office buildings , places of work , airports , concert and sport venues — in other words , most areas people need or want to frequent , if not daily , then at least occasionally .
Infection status must be known “ for people to participate in societal functions.
” Legislation must be passed to protect people from being fired from their jobs based on their infection status .
Are you concerned yet ?
Anyone who remembers the tactics employed in Nazi @ @ @ @ @ @ @ current surveillance of the Chinese population , will realize where this is headed .
Reading through the plan , it should also be crystal clear that this tracking and surveillance program is not designed to be temporary .
You can be strongly assured this will be permanent .
It calls for hundreds of thousands of new employees , updating computer systems and new laws that in many ways resemble the implementation of TSA post-9/11 .
Not addressed in this report is the question of just how often would you have to undergo testing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be valid tomorrow , if you happen to come across someone who is infected between now and then .
Would you have to undergo testing every single day ?
Once a week ?
If regular retesting is not part of the plan , then the whole system is worthless as your infection status could change at any time .
If you happen to be in the vicinity of someone who tests positive in the near future , would you have to quarantine for two weeks ?
Will your employer pay for that time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when you come out of quarantine ?
What if you quarantine for two weeks but don ’ t get sick and test negative for antibodies , then go out and happen across yet another person who ends up testing positive shortly thereafter .
Will you be forced into quarantine again ?
Where does it end ?
The tracking system The Rockefeller Foundation is calling for is eerily similar to that already being used in China , where residents are required to enroll in a health condition registry .
Once enrolled , they get @ @ @ @ @ @ @ must then enter in order to gain access to grocery stores and other facilities.10 The plan also demands access to other medical data .
According to the “ National COVID-19 Testing Action Plan ” :11 “ This infection database must easily interoperate with doctor , hospital and insurance health records in an essential and urgent national program to finally rationalize the disparate and sometimes deliberately isolated electronic medical records systems across the country … Unfortunately , obtaining the necessary clinical data to bring these powerful analytic tools to bear has been difficult due @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( EHR ) vendors .
Among the longtime tactics used by such vendors has been charging unreasonable fees for data access , requiring providers to sign restrictive contracts , and claiming patients ’ clinical data is proprietary .
On March 9 , the Department of Health and Human Services ( HHS ) released two long-awaited final rules that would prohibit information blocking in health care and advance more seamless exchange of health care data .
But publication in the Federal Register , necessary to activate the rules , has been inexplicably delayed .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ words , this plan is far more comprehensive than merely tracking COVID-19 cases .
It ’ s designed to replace the current system of “ disparate and sometimes deliberately isolated electronic medical records systems across the country.
” While The Rockefeller Foundation ’ s white paper simply calls for the use of a digital “ patient identification number ” without indicating exactly how you would carry this ID number on your person , Gates has repeatedly talked about the “ need ” for some sort of implantable vaccine certificate .
In 1999 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ $ 750 million to set up Gavi , The Vaccine Alliance.12 Gavi , in turn , has partnered with the ID2020 Alliance , along with the Bangladeshi government , to launch a digital identity program called ID2020.13 The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation also funded the GSMA Inclusive Tech Lab , launched in 2019 , the aim of which is to promote access to digital and biometric identity services and systems.14,15 ID2020 , which also launched in 2019 , is designed to “ leverage immunization as an opportunity to establish digital identity.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ carry “ far-reaching implications for individuals ’ access to services and livelihoods , ” so to think that Gates ’ call for implantable COVID-19 vaccine certificates would be limited to that alone would again be a grave mistake .
Like The Rockefeller Foundation , Gates is not presenting short-term , temporary measures .
They ’ re both aiming to implement a totalitarian control system .
It ’ s not so far-fetched to imagine a future in which your vaccine certificate or “ unique patient ID number ” replaces personal identifications such as your @ @ @ @ @ @ @ card , Social Security card and passport , and is tied not only to your medical records in total , but also your finances .
I remain confident that it would be a tragic mistake to trust Gates , Rockefeller , Google or any of the other players that are being brought before us as the saviors of the day .
While most people are well-acquainted with the Rockefeller name , few probably know the true history of the Rockefellers ’ rise to power .
If you fall in this category , be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Industry Conquered Medicine , Finance and Agriculture , ” which features an excellent video report by James Corbett .
Those who are ignorant of history are bound to repeat it , and if the Rockefeller story tells us anything , it is that unless we realize what has been done , we ’ ll be deceived again and again , because the oil oligarchy ’ s end game is yet to be realized — if we let them .
From the author : The existing medical establishment is responsible for killing and permanently @ @ @ @ @ @ @ surging numbers of visitors to Mercola.com since I began the site in 1997 – we are now routinely among the top 10 health sites on the Internet – convinces me that you , too , are fed up with their deception .
You want practical health solutions without the hype , and that ’ s what I offer .

Billy Boy — who illegally invests in the same industries he gives charitable donations to, and who promotes a global public health agenda that benefits the companies he’s invested in — has gone on record saying life will not go back to normal until we have the ability to vaccinate the entire global population against COVID-19.1
To that end, he is pushing for disease surveillance and a jjab tracking system2 that might involve embedding vaccination records on our bodies.
One example of how this might be done is using an invisible ink quantum dot tattoo, described in a December 18, 2019, Science Translational Medicine paper.3,4
According to statements made by Gates, societal and financial normalcy may never return to those who refuse vaccination, as the digital vaccination certificate Gates is pushing for might ultimately be required to go about your day-to-day life and business.
Without this “digital immunity proof,” you may not even be allowed to travel locally or visit certain public buildings.
Gates has a history of “predicting” global pandemics with vast numbers of deaths,5 and with his call for a tracking system to keep tabs on infected/ noninfected and vaccinated/ unvaccinated individuals, he’s ensuring an unimaginably profitable future for the jjab makers he supports and makes money from via his Foundation investments.
Along with Gates, The Rockefeller Foundation is also coordinating efforts in the direction of social control through the implementation of draconian COVID-19 tracking and tracing measures that are clearly meant to become permanent.
National COVID-19 Testing Action Plan
April 21, 2020, The Rockefeller Foundation released a white paper6 titled, “National COVID-19 Testing Action Plan — Strategic Steps to Reopen Our Workplaces and Our Communities.”
In the foreword, Rockefeller Foundation president Dr. Rajiv J. Shah writes:
“In the face of an ineffective nationally-coordinated response, insufficient data, and inadequate amounts of protective gear and testing, we need an exit plan. Testing is our way out of this crisis.
Instead of ricocheting between an unsustainable shutdown and a dangerous, uncertain return to normalcy, the United States must mount a sustainable strategy with better tests and contact tracing, and stay the course for as long as it takes to develop a jjab or cure.
Any plan to do so must win the faith of private and public sector leaders across the country, and of individual Americans that they and their loved ones will be safer when we begin to return to daily life.
The Rockefeller Foundation exists to meet moments like this.
In the past two weeks we have brought together experts and leaders from science, industry, academia, public policy, and government — across sectors and political ideologies — to create a clear, pragmatic, data-driven, actionable plan to beat back Covid-19 and get Americans back to work more safely.”
The plan calls for testing and tracing 1 million Americans per week to start, incrementally ramping it up to 3 million and then 30 million per week (the “1-3-30 plan”) over the next six months until the entire population has been covered.
Test results would then be collected on a digital platform capable of tracking all tested individuals so that contact-tracing can be performed when someone tests positive.
According to the “National COVID-19 Testing Action Plan”:
“Policy makers and the public must find the balance between privacy concerns and infection control to allow the infection status of most Americans to be accessed and validated in a few required settings and many voluntary ones.”
To this end, they suggest using incentives “to nudge the voluntary use” of tracking and contact tracing apps rather than making them mandatory.
They also call for the use of “innovative digital technologies” aimed at improving “workforce monitoring and early detection of recurrent outbreaks.”
“When integrated into national and state surveillance systems, such innovations may enable the same level of outbreak detection with fewer tests.
Promising techniques include anonymous digital tracking of workforces or population-based resting heart-rate and smart thermometer trends; continually updated epidemiological data modeling; and artificial intelligence projections based on clinical and imaging data,” the document states.7
Modern ‘Wartime’ Effort That Will Cost Billions
According to the “National COVID-19 Testing Action Plan”:8
“Monitoring the pandemic and adjusting social distancing measures will require launching the largest public health testing program in American history …
“The effort will ultimately grow to billions of dollars per month … But with widespread business closures costing the country $350 billion to $400 billion each month, the expense will be worth it.
“This testing infrastructure is intended to tide the country over until a jjab or therapy is widely available.
“Coordination of such a massive program should be treated as a wartime effort, with a public/ private bipartisan Pandemic Testing Board established to assist and serve as a bridge between local, state, and federal officials with the logistical, investment and political challenges this operation will inevitably face.”
Don’t Be Naïve About Infectious Tracking Plan
Call me jaded, but this sounds like a plan to surveil Americans so that they can easily be tracked down for mandatory vaccination once a COVID-19 jjab becomes available.
It also creates the necessary infrastructure for vaccination tracking across the board, for all jjabs.
While they give lip-service to privacy and anonymization of data, privacy promises have been repeatedly broken in the past. Besides, the document clearly states that:9
“Some privacy concerns must be set aside for an infectious agent as virulent as Covid-19, allowing the infection status of most Americans to be accessed and validated in a few required settings and many voluntary ones.
The loss of privacy engendered by such a system would come at too high of a price if the arrival of a jjab early next year was a certainty.
But jjab development and manufacture could take years, and when it comes certain populations may be excluded from receiving it for health reasons.
In the meantime, infection status must be known for people to participate in many societal functions. Legislation protecting people from being fired over infection status must be passed.
Those screened must be given a unique patient identification number that would link to information about a patient’s viral, antibody and eventually jjab status under a system that could easily handshake with other systems to speed the return of normal societal functions.
Schools could link this to attendance lists, large office buildings to employee ID cards, TSA to passenger lists and concert and sports venues to ticket purchasers.
Such connections should be made in a way that protects personally identifying information whenever possible … Whenever and wherever possible data should be open.”
Are You Ready to Give Up EVERYTHING Over a Flu Virus?
“Privacy concerns must be set aside.” Infection status must be “accessed and validated in a few required settings.”
Infection status will be linked to schools, office buildings, places of work, airports, concert and sport venues — in other words, most areas people need or want to frequent, if not daily, then at least occasionally.
Infection status must be known “for people to participate in societal functions.”
Legislation must be passed to protect people from being fired from their jobs based on their infection status.
Are you concerned yet?
Anyone who remembers the tactics employed in Nazi Germany, or anyone familiar with the current surveillance of the Chinese population, will realize where this is headed.
Reading through the plan, it should also be crystal clear that this tracking and surveillance program is not designed to be temporary.
You can be strongly assured this will be permanent. It calls for hundreds of thousands of new employees, updating computer systems and new laws that in many ways resemble the implementation of TSA post-9/11.
Not addressed in this report is the question of just how often would you have to undergo testing.
A negative test today may not be valid tomorrow, if you happen to come across someone who is infected between now and then. Would you have to undergo testing every single day? Once a week?
If regular retesting is not part of the plan, then the whole system is worthless as your infection status could change at any time.
Other questions not addressed:
If you happen to be in the vicinity of someone who tests positive in the near future, would you have to quarantine for two weeks?
Will your employer pay for that time off? Will you have a job when you come out of quarantine?
What if you quarantine for two weeks but don’t get sick and test negative for antibodies, then go out and happen across yet another person who ends up testing positive shortly thereafter.
Will you be forced into quarantine again? Where does it end?
The tracking system The Rockefeller Foundation is calling for is eerily similar to that already being used in China, where residents are required to enroll in a health condition registry.
Once enrolled, they get a personal QR code, which they must then enter in order to gain access to grocery stores and other facilities.10
The plan also demands access to other medical data. According to the “National COVID-19 Testing Action Plan”:11
“This infection database must easily interoperate with doctor, hospital and insurance health records in an essential and urgent national program to finally rationalize the disparate and sometimes deliberately isolated electronic medical records systems across the country …
Unfortunately, obtaining the necessary clinical data to bring these powerful analytic tools to bear has been difficult due to information-blocking tactics of electronic health records (EHR) vendors.
Among the longtime tactics used by such vendors has been charging unreasonable fees for data access, requiring providers to sign restrictive contracts, and claiming patients’ clinical data is proprietary.
On March 9, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released two long-awaited final rules that would prohibit information blocking in health care and advance more seamless exchange of health care data.
But publication in the Federal Register, necessary to activate the rules, has been inexplicably delayed. This delay must end.”
In other words, this plan is far more comprehensive than merely tracking COVID-19 cases.
It’s designed to replace the current system of “disparate and sometimes deliberately isolated electronic medical records systems across the country.”
ID2020
While The Rockefeller Foundation’s white paper simply calls for the use of a digital “patient identification number” without indicating exactly how you would carry this ID number on your person, Gates has repeatedly talked about the “need” for some sort of implantable jjab certificate.
In 1999, The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation donated $750 million to set up Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance.12
Gavi, in turn, has partnered with the ID2020 Alliance, along with the Bangladeshi government, to launch a digital identity program called ID2020.13
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation also funded the GSMA Inclusive Tech Lab, launched in 2019, the aim of which is to promote access to digital and biometric identity services and systems.14,15
ID2020, which also launched in 2019, is designed to “leverage immunization as an opportunity to establish digital identity.”
This digital identity system is said to carry “far-reaching implications for individuals’ access to services and livelihoods,” so to think that Gates’ call for implantable COVID-19 jjab certificates would be limited to that alone would again be a grave mistake.
Like The Rockefeller Foundation, Gates is not presenting short-term, temporary measures. They’re both aiming to implement a totalitarian control system.
It’s not so far-fetched to imagine a future in which your jjab certificate or “unique patient ID number” replaces personal identifications such as your driver’s license, state ID card, Social Security card and passport, and is tied not only to your medical records in total, but also your finances.
I remain confident that it would be a tragic mistake to trust Gates, Rockefeller, Google or any of the other players that are being brought before us as the saviors of the day.
While most people are well-acquainted with the Rockefeller name, few probably know the true history of the Rockefellers’ rise to power.
If you fall in this category, be sure to read “How the Oil Industry Conquered Medicine, Finance and Agriculture,” which features an excellent video report by James Corbett.
Those who are ignorant of history are bound to repeat it, and if the Rockefeller story tells us anything, it is that unless we realize what has been done, we’ll be deceived again and again, because the oil oligarchy’s end game is yet to be realized — if we let them.
By Dr. Joseph Mercola
From the author: The existing medical establishment is responsible for killing and permanently injuring millions of Americans, but the surging numbers of visitors to Mercola.com since I began the site in 1997 – we are now routinely among the top 10 health sites on the Internet – convinces me that you, too, are fed up with their deception. You want practical health solutions without the hype, and that’s what I offer.
Sources and References: