humansarefree--2020-09-26--How Can We Resist Bill Gates’ War On Life?

Excerpted from Vandana Shiva ’ s book Oneness vs. the 1 % : Shattering Illusions , Seeding Freedom ( Chelsea Green Publishing , August 2020 ) .
In March 2015 , Bill Gates showed an image of the coronavirus during a TED Talk and told the audience that it was what the greatest catastrophe of our time would look like .
The real threat to life , he said , is ‘ not missiles , but microbes.
’ When the coronavirus pandemic swept over the earth like a tsunami five years later , he revived the war language , describing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ .
‘ The coronavirus pandemic pits all of humanity against the virus , ’ he said .
In fact , the pandemic is not a war .
The pandemic is a consequence of war .
A war against life .
The mechanical mind connected to the money machine of extraction has created the illusion of humans as separate from nature , and nature as dead , inert raw material to be exploited .
But , in fact , we are part of the biome .
And we are part of the virome @ @ @ @ @ @ @ us .
When we wage war on the biodiversity of our forests , our farms , and in our guts , we wage war on ourselves .
The health emergency of the coronavirus is inseparable from the health emergency of extinction , the health emergency of biodiversity loss , and the health emergency of the climate crisis .
All of these emergencies are rooted in a mechanistic , militaristic , anthropocentric worldview that considers humans separate from–and superior to–other beings .
Beings we can own , manipulate , and control .
All of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ model based on the illusion of limitless growth and limitless greed , which violate planetary boundaries , and destroy the integrity of ecosystems and individual species .
New diseases arise because a globalized , industrialized , inefficient agriculture invades habitats , destroys ecosystems , and manipulates animals , plants , and other organisms with no respect for their integrity or their health .
We are linked worldwide through the spread of diseases like the coronavirus because we have invaded the homes of other species , manipulated plants and animals for commercial profits and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we clear-cut forests , as we turn farms into industrial monocultures that produce toxic , nutritionally empty commodities , as our diets become degraded through industrial processing with synthetic chemicals and genetic engineering , and as we perpetuate the illusion that earth and life are raw materials to be exploited for profits , we are indeed connecting .
But instead of connecting on a continuum of health by protecting biodiversity , integrity , and self-organization of all living beings , including humans , we are connected through disease .
According to the International @ @ @ @ @ @ @ economy workers ( representing the most vulnerable in the labour market ) , out of a worldwide total of two billion and a global workforce of 3.3 billion , have suffered massive damage to their capacity to earn a living .
This is due to lockdown measures and/or because they work in the hardest-hit sectors.
’ According to the World Food Programme , a quarter of a billion additional people will be pushed to hunger and 300,000 could die every day .
These , too , are pandemics that are killing people .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ saving lives .
Health is about life and living systems .
There is no ‘ life ’ in the paradigm of health that Bill Gates and his ilk are promoting and imposing on the entire world .
Gates has created global alliances to impose top-down analysis and prescriptions for health problems .
He gives money to define the problems , and then he uses his influence and money to impose the solutions .
And in the process , he gets richer .
His ‘ funding ’ results in an erasure of democracy and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ His ‘ philanthropy ’ is not just philanthrocapitalism .
It is philanthroimperialism .
The coronavirus pandemic and lockdown have revealed even more clearly how we are being reduced to objects to be controlled , with our bodies and minds as the new colonies to be invaded .
Empires create colonies , colonies enclose the commons of the indigenous living communities and turn them into sources of raw material to be extracted for profits .
This linear , extractive logic is unable to see the intimate relations that sustain life in the natural world @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cycles of renewal , values of giving and sharing , and the power and potential of self-organising and mutuality .
It is blind to the waste it creates and to the violence it unleashes .
The extended coronavirus lockdown has been a lab experiment for a future without humanity .
On March 26 , 2020 , at a peak of the coronavirus pandemic and in the midst of the lockdown , Microsoft was granted a patent by the World Intellectual Property Organization ( WIPO ) .
Patent WO 060606 declares that ‘ Human @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to a user may be used in a mining process of a cryptocurrency system….
’ The ‘ body activity ’ that Microsoft wants to mine includes radiation emitted from the human body , brain activities , body fluid flow , blood flow , organ activity , body movement such as eye movement , facial movement , and muscle movement , as well as any other activities that can be sensed and represented by images , waves , signals , texts , numbers , degrees , or any other information or data .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our bodies and minds .
In colonialism , colonisers assign themselves the right to take the land and resources of indigenous people , extinguish their cultures and sovereignty , and in extreme cases exterminate them .
Patent WO 060606 is a declaration by Microsoft that our bodies and minds are its new colonies .
We are mines of ‘ raw material ’ –the data extracted from our bodies .
Rather than sovereign , spiritual , conscious , intelligent beings making decisions and choices with wisdom and ethical values about the impacts of our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of which we are a part , and to which we are inextricably related , we are ‘ users.
’ A ‘ user ’ is a consumer without choice in the digital empire .
But that ’ s not the totality of Gates ’ vision .
In fact , it is even more sinister–to colonise the minds , bodies , and spirits of our children before they even have the opportunity to understand what freedom and sovereignty look and feel like , beginning with the most vulnerable .
In May 2020 , Governor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ partnership with the Gates Foundation to ‘ reinvent education.
’ Cuomo called Gates a visionary and argued that the pandemic has created ‘ a moment in history when we can actually incorporate and advance [ Gates ’ ] ideas… all these buildings , all these physical classrooms–why with all the technology you have ?
’ In fact , Gates has been trying to dismantle the public education system of the United States for two decades .
For him students are mines for data .
That is why the indicators he promotes are attendance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a math and reading test , because these can be easily quantified and mined .
In reimagining education , children will be monitored through surveillance systems to check if they are attentive while they are forced to take classes remotely , alone at home .
The dystopia is one where children never return to schools , do not have a chance to play , do not have friends .
It is a world without society , without relationships , without love and friendship .
As I look to the future in a world @ @ @ @ @ @ @ see a humanity that is further polarized into large numbers of ‘ throw away ’ people who have no place in the new Empire .
Those who are included in the new Empire will be little more than digital slaves .
Or , we can resist .
We can seed another future , deepen our democracies , reclaim our commons , regenerate the earth as living members of a One Earth Family , rich in our diversity and freedom , one in our unity and interconnectedness .
It is a healthier future .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It is one we must claim .
We stand at a precipice of extinction .
Will we allow our humanity as living , conscious , intelligent , autonomous beings to be extinguished by a greed machine that does not know limits and is unable to put a break on its colonisation and destruction ?
Or will we stop the machine and defend our humanity , freedom , and autonomy to protect life on earth ?
Written by Dr. Vandana Shiva – The above is excerpted from Vandana Shiva ’ s book Oneness @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Seeding Freedom ( Chelsea Green Publishing , August 2020 ) and is reprinted with permission from the publisher .
( via Collective-Evolution.com )

Excerpted from Vandana Shiva’s book Oneness vs. the 1%: Shattering Illusions, Seeding Freedom (Chelsea Green Publishing, August 2020).
In March 2015, Billy Boy showed an image of the coronavirus during a TED Talk and told the audience that it was what the greatest catastrophe of our time would look like.
The real threat to life, he said, is ‘not missiles, but microbes.’ When the coronavirus pandemic swept over the earth like a tsunami five years later, he revived the war language, describing the pandemic as ‘a world war’.
‘The coronavirus pandemic pits all of humanity against the virus,’ he said.
In fact, the pandemic is not a war. The pandemic is a consequence of war. A war against life.
The mechanical mind connected to the money machine of extraction has created the illusion of humans as separate from nature, and nature as dead, inert raw material to be exploited. But, in fact, we are part of the biome. And we are part of the virome.
The biome and the virome are us. When we wage war on the biodiversity of our forests, our farms, and in our guts, we wage war on ourselves.
The health emergency of the coronavirus is inseparable from the health emergency of extinction, the health emergency of biodiversity loss, and the health emergency of the climate crisis.
All of these emergencies are rooted in a mechanistic, militaristic, anthropocentric worldview that considers humans separate from–and superior to–other beings. Beings we can own, manipulate, and control.
All of these emergencies are rooted in an economic model based on the illusion of limitless growth and limitless greed, which violate planetary boundaries, and destroy the integrity of ecosystems and individual species.
New diseases arise because a globalized, industrialized, inefficient agriculture invades habitats, destroys ecosystems, and manipulates animals, plants, and other organisms with no respect for their integrity or their health.
We are linked worldwide through the spread of diseases like the coronavirus because we have invaded the homes of other species, manipulated plants and animals for commercial profits and greed, and cultivated monocultures.
As we clear-cut forests, as we turn farms into industrial monocultures that produce toxic, nutritionally empty commodities, as our diets become degraded through industrial processing with synthetic chemicals and genetic engineering, and as we perpetuate the illusion that earth and life are raw materials to be exploited for profits, we are indeed connecting.
But instead of connecting on a continuum of health by protecting biodiversity, integrity, and self-organization of all living beings, including humans, we are connected through disease.
According to the International Labour Organization, ‘1.6 billion informal economy workers (representing the most vulnerable in the labour market), out of a worldwide total of two billion and a global workforce of 3.3 billion, have suffered massive damage to their capacity to earn a living.
This is due to lockdown measures and/or because they work in the hardest-hit sectors.’
According to the World Food Programme, a quarter of a billion additional people will be pushed to hunger and 300,000 could die every day.
These, too, are pandemics that are killing people. Killing cannot be a prescription for saving lives.
Health is about life and living systems. There is no ‘life’ in the paradigm of health that Billy Boy and his ilk are promoting and imposing on the entire world.
Gates has created global alliances to impose top-down analysis and prescriptions for health problems.
He gives money to define the problems, and then he uses his influence and money to impose the solutions. And in the process, he gets richer. His ‘funding’ results in an erasure of democracy and biodiversity, of nature and culture.
His ‘philanthropy’ is not just philanthrocapitalism. It is philanthroimperialism.
The coronavirus pandemic and lockdown have revealed even more clearly how we are being reduced to objects to be controlled, with our bodies and minds as the new colonies to be invaded.
Empires create colonies, colonies enclose the commons of the indigenous living communities and turn them into sources of raw material to be extracted for profits.
This linear, extractive logic is unable to see the intimate relations that sustain life in the natural world.
It is blind to diversity, cycles of renewal, values of giving and sharing, and the power and potential of self-organising and mutuality.
It is blind to the waste it creates and to the violence it unleashes. The extended coronavirus lockdown has been a lab experiment for a future without humanity.
On March 26, 2020, at a peak of the coronavirus pandemic and in the midst of the lockdown, Microsoft was granted a patent by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).
Patent WO 060606 declares that ‘Human Body Activity associated with a task provided to a user may be used in a mining process of a cryptocurrency system….’
The ‘body activity’ that Microsoft wants to mine includes radiation emitted from the human body, brain activities, body fluid flow, blood flow, organ activity, body movement such as eye movement, facial movement, and muscle movement, as well as any other activities that can be sensed and represented by images, waves, signals, texts, numbers, degrees, or any other information or data.
The patent is an intellectual property claim over our bodies and minds. In colonialism, colonisers assign themselves the right to take the land and resources of indigenous people, extinguish their cultures and sovereignty, and in extreme cases exterminate them.
Patent WO 060606 is a declaration by Microsoft that our bodies and minds are its new colonies. We are mines of ‘raw material’–the data extracted from our bodies.
Rather than sovereign, spiritual, conscious, intelligent beings making decisions and choices with wisdom and ethical values about the impacts of our actions on the natural and social world of which we are a part, and to which we are inextricably related, we are ‘users.’
A ‘user’ is a consumer without choice in the digital empire.
But that’s not the totality of Gates’ vision. In fact, it is even more sinister–to colonise the minds, bodies, and spirits of our children before they even have the opportunity to understand what freedom and sovereignty look and feel like, beginning with the most vulnerable.
In May 2020, Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York announced a partnership with the Gates Foundation to ‘reinvent education.’
Cuomo called Gates a visionary and argued that the pandemic has created ‘a moment in history when we can actually incorporate and advance [Gates’] ideas… all these buildings, all these physical classrooms–why with all the technology you have?’
In fact, Gates has been trying to dismantle the public education system of the United States for two decades. For him students are mines for data.
That is why the indicators he promotes are attendance, college enrollment, and scores on a math and reading test, because these can be easily quantified and mined.
In reimagining education, children will be monitored through surveillance systems to check if they are attentive while they are forced to take classes remotely, alone at home.
The dystopia is one where children never return to schools, do not have a chance to play, do not have friends. It is a world without society, without relationships, without love and friendship.
As I look to the future in a world of Gates and Tech Barons, I see a humanity that is further polarized into large numbers of ‘throw away’ people who have no place in the new Empire.
Those who are included in the new Empire will be little more than digital slaves.
Or, we can resist. We can seed another future, deepen our democracies, reclaim our commons, regenerate the earth as living members of a One Earth Family, rich in our diversity and freedom, one in our unity and interconnectedness.
It is a healthier future. It is one we must fight for. It is one we must claim.
We stand at a precipice of extinction. Will we allow our humanity as living, conscious, intelligent, autonomous beings to be extinguished by a greed machine that does not know limits and is unable to put a break on its colonisation and destruction?
Or will we stop the machine and defend our humanity, freedom, and autonomy to protect life on earth?
Written by Dr. Vandana Shiva – The above is excerpted from Vandana Shiva’s book Oneness vs. the 1%: Shattering Illusions, Seeding Freedom (Chelsea Green Publishing, August 2020) and is reprinted with permission from the publisher. (via Collective-Evolution.com)


humansarefree--2020-09-26--British Foreign Secretary Says ‘False Positive Rate’ for COVID-19 is ‘Very High’

British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab recently made an appearance on Sky News , and when asked about testing inside of airports he stated that , “ The challenge is the false positive rate is very high , so only seven percent of tests will be successful in identifying those that actually have the the virus .
So the truth is , we can ’ t just rely on that… ” He went on to mention that we must rely on self-isolation at home , and have further testing there as well as an overall effort to ramp up testing , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tests used at home any more accurate ?
Does this mean the infection fatality rate is actually higher because not as many people are infected ?
Or does this mean , as multiple studies have pointed out , that the number of infected people greatly exceed our current numbers ( thus greatly lowing the fatality rate ) and that the tests simply aren ’ t capable or properly identifying these people ?
A false positive test means that people who test positive for the virus may not actually have it .
This theme @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lately , radio show host Julia Hartley-Brewer was one of the latest to do so as you can see below .
In July , professor Carl Heneghan , director for the centre of evidence-based medicine at Oxford University and outspoken critic of the current UK response to the pandemic , wrote a piece titled : “ How many Covid diagnoses are false positives ?
” He has argued that due to a bit of a fluke involving some slightly complicated statistics , the proportion of positive tests that are false in the UK @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Former scientific advisor at Pfizer , Dr Mike Yeadon argued the proportion of positive tests that are false is actually “ around 90 % ” .
The Bulgarian Pathology Association has taken the stance that the testing used to identify the new coronavirus in patients is “ scientifically meaningless.
” He criticized the World Health Organization ( WHO ) and called them “ a criminal medical organization ” for creating fear and hysteria without , according to him , providing any verifiable scientific proof of a pandemic .
This may seem confusing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s been published .
For example , the National Institutes of Health ( NIH ) claims that “ Potent antibodies found in people recovered from COVID-19.
” ( source ) So it ’ s understandable how many people would not agree with the stance of the association , and claim that it is indeed false , and that ’ s an understandable perception , They cite an article published in “ Off Guardian ” that makes some very interesting points .
I recommend you read the entire article here to get the full @ @ @ @ @ @ @ right ?
According to a recent Huffington Post article , “ Yes , but only in a statistical sense .
Applied to the real-world , the conclusions don ’ t stand up and are wildly misleading.
” The article is titled , “ N0 , 90 % of Coronavirus Tests Are Not ‘ False Positives ’ And This Is Why : Experts explain why a theory doing the rounds about the number of people wrongly diagnosed with cOVID-19 is simply not true.
” According to Dr. Matthew Oughton , an infectious diseases specialist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Jewish General Hospital in Montreal , “ The rate of false positives with this particular test is quite low .
In other words , if the test comes back saying positive , then believe it , it ’ s a real positive.
” These are just a few of many examples of conflicting information .
Why This Is Important : It ’ s not hard to see why there is so much conflicting information out there .
Expert in the field are completely separated in their belief with regards to the false @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on both sides of the coin that completely , 100 percent contradicts the other perspective .
How is the general population , or those who are taking the time to look into this issue supposed to arrive at any conclusion ?
At this point it seems nearly impossible , and what we often see from mainstream media is simply sharing a perspective or pushing a viewpoint for political purposes rather than a general desire to get to any sort of concrete truth .
This discrepancy highlights why in today ’ s day and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your own research and be aware of multiple perspectives .
We must share information that comes from ‘ credible ’ sources , or information that is backed up with reasoning , questioning , proof and evidence .
What seems to be happening with covid I find is that many people are sharing a lot of unsubstantiated information which makes it harder for the ‘ alternative ’ thinking community to arrive at any kind of truth .
It also delegitimizes the ‘ truth ’ movement in this time of deceit and misinformation , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as mainstream media to group all of us who are in pursuit of truth as “ conspiracy theorists ” and justify their campaign of censorship on information that opposes the mainstream narrative .
With covid , we ’ ve seen some of the world ’ s leading experts in the field experience censorship simply for sharing information , opinions and evidence that contradicts the World Health Organization .
Michael Levitt , a Biophysicist and a professor of structural biology at Stanford University is one of countless scientists to who have criticized the WHO @ @ @ @ @ @ @ information and informed perspectives regarding the Coronavirus .
Another huge issue we are facing today is people not reading articles , simply reading headlines and drawing their own conclusions without examining the sources used in the article to see how legit it actually is .
We ’ ve left our minds available to those who wish to mould them and shape our perception of major events for ulterior motives .
The mainstream and traditional media seem to be failing to have important conversations that are controversial , while at the same time perhaps @ @ @ @ @ @ @ critical thinking in alternative media communities .
Given we are deeply feeling the need to make sense of our world , is it time we begin to look at developing the inner faculties necessary to move beyond ideology , limited thinking patterns and truly begin looking at what evidence around us says ?

British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab recently made an appearance on Sky News, and when asked about testing inside of airports he stated that,
“The challenge is the false positive rate is very high, so only seven percent of tests will be successful in identifying those that actually have the the virus. So the truth is, we can’t just rely on that…”
He went on to mention that we must rely on self-isolation at home, and have further testing there as well as an overall effort to ramp up testing, but my question is, are the tests used at home any more accurate?
Does this mean the infection fatality rate is actually higher because not as many people are infected?
Or does this mean, as multiple studies have pointed out, that the number of infected people greatly exceed our current numbers (thus greatly lowing the fatality rate) and that the tests simply aren’t capable or properly identifying these people?
A false positive test means that people who test positive for the virus may not actually have it.
This theme has been floating around quite a bit lately, radio show host Julia Hartley-Brewer was one of the latest to do so as you can see below.
In July, professor Carl Heneghan, director for the centre of evidence-based medicine at Oxford University and outspoken critic of the current UK response to the pandemic, wrote a piece titled: “How many Covid diagnoses are false positives?”
He has argued that due to a bit of a fluke involving some slightly complicated statistics, the proportion of positive tests that are false in the UK could be as high as 50%.
Former scientific advisor at Pfizer, Dr Mike Yeadon argued the proportion of positive tests that are false is actually “around 90%”.
The Bulgarian Pathology Association has taken the stance that the testing used to identify the new coronavirus in patients is “scientifically meaningless.”
He criticized the World Health Organization (WHO) and called them “a criminal medical organization” for creating fear and hysteria without, according to him, providing any verifiable scientific proof of a pandemic.
This may seem confusing as it goes against information that’s been published.
For example, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) claims that “Potent antibodies found in people recovered from COVID-19.” (source)
So it’s understandable how many people would not agree with the stance of the association, and claim that it is indeed false, and that’s an understandable perception,
They cite an article published in “Off Guardian” that makes some very interesting points. I recommend you read the entire article here to get the full scope of their reasoning.
Are they right? According to a recent Huffington Post article,
“Yes, but only in a statistical sense. Applied to the real-world, the conclusions don’t stand up and are wildly misleading.”
The article is titled, “N0, 90 % of Coronavirus Tests Are Not ‘False Positives’ And This Is Why: Experts explain why a theory doing the rounds about the number of people wrongly diagnosed with cOVID-19 is simply not true.”
According to Dr. Matthew Oughton, an infectious diseases specialist at the McGill University Health Centre and the Jewish General Hospital in Montreal,
“The rate of false positives with this particular test is quite low. In other words, if the test comes back saying positive, then believe it, it’s a real positive.”
These are just a few of many examples of conflicting information.
Why This Is Important: It’s not hard to see why there is so much conflicting information out there.
Expert in the field are completely separated in their belief with regards to the false positive issue, and there is information on both sides of the coin that completely, 100 percent contradicts the other perspective.
How is the general population, or those who are taking the time to look into this issue supposed to arrive at any conclusion?
At this point it seems nearly impossible, and what we often see from mainstream media is simply sharing a perspective or pushing a viewpoint for political purposes rather than a general desire to get to any sort of concrete truth.
This discrepancy highlights why in today’s day and age it’s important to conduct your own research and be aware of multiple perspectives.
We must share information that comes from ‘credible’ sources, or information that is backed up with reasoning, questioning, proof and evidence.
What seems to be happening with covid I find is that many people are sharing a lot of unsubstantiated information which makes it harder for the ‘alternative’ thinking community to arrive at any kind of truth.
There are multiple examples.
It also delegitimizes the ‘truth’ movement in this time of deceit and misinformation, and it allows ‘fact-checkers’ as well as mainstream media to group all of us who are in pursuit of truth as “conspiracy theorists” and justify their campaign of censorship on information that opposes the mainstream narrative.
With covid, we’ve seen some of the world’s leading experts in the field experience censorship simply for sharing information, opinions and evidence that contradicts the World Health Organization.
Michael Levitt, a Biophysicist and a professor of structural biology at Stanford University is one of countless scientists to who have criticized the WHO as well as Facebook for censoring different information and informed perspectives regarding the Coronavirus.
Another huge issue we are facing today is people not reading articles, simply reading headlines and drawing their own conclusions without examining the sources used in the article to see how legit it actually is.
We’ve left our minds available to those who wish to mould them and shape our perception of major events for ulterior motives.
The Takeaway
The mainstream and traditional media seem to be failing to have important conversations that are controversial, while at the same time perhaps there isn’t enough rigour and critical thinking in alternative media communities.
Given we are deeply feeling the need to make sense of our world, is it time we begin to look at developing the inner faculties necessary to move beyond ideology, limited thinking patterns and truly begin looking at what evidence around us says?
By Arjun Walia, Guest writer


humansarefree--2020-09-27--Donald Trump Jr.: Hunter Biden is Partaking in Sex Trafficking, ‘Like the Sick Bastard He Is’

Donald Trump Jr. and his girlfriend and conservative personality Kim Guilfoyle took to social media on Saturday morning to release @ @ @ @ @ news that Hunter Biden was caught up in multi-million dollar foreign money schemes and linked @ @ @ @ @ trafficking ring ” of Russian and Ukrainian women .
Donald Trump , Jr. : One @ @ @ @ @ Biden .
We get to get lectured about how these are such great people , @ @ @ @ @ sex trafficking rings of Eastern Europeans , that ’ s wonderful .
Kim Guilfoyle : @ @ @ @ @ down sex trafficking rings and child sex trafficking .
Donald Trump , Jr. : That @ @ @ @ @ .
Donald Trump and Ivanka they ’ re funding the task forces that attack human @ @ @ @ @ from happening .
Meanwhile , Hunter Biden is partaking in the other side of it @ @ @ @ @ is .

Donald Trump Jr. and his girlfriend and conservative personality Kim Guilfoyle took to social media on Saturday morning to release a video reaction to the news that Hunter Biden was caught up in multi-million dollar foreign money schemes and linked to “prostitution or human trafficking ring” of Russian and Ukrainian women.
Donald Trump, Jr.: One revelation this week is Hunter Biden. We get to get lectured about how these are such great people, the Bidens, tied to sex trafficking rings of Eastern Europeans, that’s wonderful.
Kim Guilfoyle: While your father is taking down sex trafficking rings and child sex trafficking.
Donald Trump, Jr.: That’s a good point. Donald Trump and Ivanka they’re funding the task forces that attack human trafficking to prevent that stuff from happening. Meanwhile, Hunter Biden is partaking in the other side of it like the sick bastard he is.
Reference: TheGatewayPundit.com


humansarefree--2020-09-27--Thousands Rally in London to Oppose Another Lockdown: ‘We Do Not Consent’

Six months after parliament passed the Coronavirus Act 2020 , which gives the government powers to impose lockdowns and other restrictive social distancing measures ( measures that have been accompanied by stiff fines ) , thousands of Britons packed London ’ s Trafalgar Square bearing signs reading “ We Do Not Consent ” and “ Think Before It ’ s Illegal ” during a rally that was billed as a “ We Do Not Consent ” anti-lockdown demonstration .
The event was organized by a coalition of political groups , and supporters have been galvanized by the talk of another @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as well as PM Boris Johnson ’ s assurances that a lockdown would be imposed if the government felt all other measures had failed .
Protests are exempt from the rule of six , a rule that threatens fines for groups of more than six people , which has created much aggravation in the UK .
Organizers of the rally had to submit a “ risk assessment ” and agree to comply with social distancing rules .
While police told the press that the organizers had completed these requirements , the metropolitan police @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wearing masks and violating other rules .
They added that enforcement “ remains a last resort but will be undertaken if required.
” Demonstrators waved signs and British flags and cheered as speakers – including several notable “ conspiracy theories ” , according to the Guardian – addressed the crowd .
At points , police fulfilled their promise to break up crowds .
Before they began , the protests received a warning from the Metropolitan Police , which said it would intervene if the protesters don ’ t abide by social distancing guidelines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Free Speech Union , expressed hope that law enforcement would allow the group to protest “ as they did with [ Extinction Rebellion ] and BLM.
” Attending the protest , Kerry Dunn , 41 , from Bath , claimed her son , Beau , suffered adverse affects after being vaccinated .
“ I ’ ve been shouting that mandatory vaccines are coming , no one believed me , ” she said .
“ Now we can see it ’ s just around the corner , we ’ ve never been closer.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ People ’ s network and family picnic ” , is also being organised by the same activists for Sunday in Hyde Park .

Six months after parliament passed the Coronavirus Act 2020, which gives the government powers to impose lockdowns and other restrictive social distancing measures (measures that have been accompanied by stiff fines), thousands of Britons packed London’s Trafalgar Square bearing signs reading “We Do Not Consent” and “Think Before It’s Illegal” during a rally that was billed as a “We Do Not Consent” anti-lockdown demonstration.
by Tyler Durden
The event was organized by a coalition of political groups, and supporters have been galvanized by the talk of another London lockdown by mayor Sadiq Khan, as well as PM Boris Johnson’s assurances that a lockdown would be imposed if the government felt all other measures had failed.
Protests are exempt from the rule of six, a rule that threatens fines for groups of more than six people, which has created much aggravation in the UK.
Organizers of the rally had to submit a “risk assessment” and agree to comply with social distancing rules.
While police told the press that the organizers had completed these requirements, the metropolitan police promised to crack down on those not wearing masks and violating other rules.
They added that enforcement “remains a last resort but will be undertaken if required.”
Demonstrators waved signs and British flags and cheered as speakers – including several notable “conspiracy theories”, according to the Guardian – addressed the crowd.
Crowds chanted “freedom” as people whistled and clapped.
#WeDoNotConsent
The crowds get bigger at every protest.
More people are waking up.
Stand up and fight for your rights.
Trafalgar Square pic.twitter.com/gugLqUfLs6 — Charlotte Gracias (@Charlotte3003G) September 26, 2020
Thousand of people have joined a #NoNewNormal demonstration against #lockdown, mass vaccination and other Covid-19 measures in Trafalgar Square. pic.twitter.com/n30bIoVJVe — Damien Gayle (@damiengayle) September 26, 2020
“I’ve been shouting that mandatory jjabs are coming, no one believed me. No we can see it’s just around the corner, we’ve never been closer.” Kerry Dunn, 41, from Bath, whose son, Beau, suffered severe brain damage after he was vaccinated. pic.twitter.com/lhZrLp022E — Damien Gayle (@damiengayle) September 26, 2020
“What is see is fear and negativity being propagated. In Ayurveda, which is the root of western medicine, we say the thing that weakens the immune system the most is negativity.” Vinothini Apok, 40, a former doctor from north London. pic.twitter.com/ZvBzzGquDB — Damien Gayle (@damiengayle) September 26, 2020
At points, police fulfilled their promise to break up crowds. Before they began, the protests received a warning from the Metropolitan Police, which said it would intervene if the protesters don’t abide by social distancing guidelines.
Police have moved in to break up the crowd at the #NoNewNormal demo pic.twitter.com/1gwbo200sB — Damien Gayle (@damiengayle) September 26, 2020
Toby Young, General Secretary of the Free Speech Union, expressed hope that law enforcement would allow the group to protest “as they did with [Extinction Rebellion] and BLM.”
Thousands have gathered in Trafalgar Square to protest against the lockdown. I hope the police allow them to peacefully protest, as they did the BLM and XR protestors. pic.twitter.com/Ef4H7uoC0x — Toby Young (@toadmeister) September 26, 2020
Attending the protest, Kerry Dunn, 41, from Bath, claimed her son, Beau, suffered adverse affects after being vaccinated.
“I’ve been shouting that mandatory jjabs are coming, no one believed me,” she said. “Now we can see it’s just around the corner, we’ve never been closer.”
Another event, billed as a “People’s network and family picnic”, is also being organised by the same activists for Sunday in Hyde Park.


humansarefree--2020-09-27--Bring Free Speech Back to Social Media… Now!

The war between conservatives and Silicon Valley is on .
The scions of social media are no longer hiding their disdain for an entire movement .
They know the outcome of this high-stakes presidential election could jeopardize their rule over the American people and unmake the oligarchy they ’ ve built with the rest of the ruling class .
If we are to save the republic , we must realize this too — and act .
Tens of millions of individual users who dare question leftist orthodoxy are being targeted and silenced by Big Tech .
There are no limits @ @ @ @ @ @ @ President of the United States .
That ’ s why the Media Research Center is fighting back with the Free Speech Alliance , which includes over 70 groups and The Claremont Institute .
We also just released our database effort to document the bias at CensorTrack.org .
One key weapon being deployed to punish conservatives is the so-called “ fact check.
” It ’ s being used to censor thousands of conservatives communicating with millions of followers .
It ’ s happened tens of thousands of times , and it ’ s getting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worst offenders .
Facebook , with 2.7 billion users , is dramatically skewed to the left in its fact-checking operation .
It now has an international “ Oversight Committee ” dominated by George Soros-funded entities that make a mockery of unbiased review .
Citizens wanting to rally in support of reopening the country have been banned because some public gatherings in some states are forbidden .
Antifa , however , thrives largely unchecked and unchallenged as it riots in the streets and harasses members of Congress in their homes .
Conservatives have made @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but to no avail .
Covid-19 has sent social media sites into censorship overdrive .
If you disagree with the social media prescription for the virus , you are silenced .
Ask the president , or his son , or countless doctors .
Social media censorship is the most direct threat to free speech worldwide coming from the most powerful companies in the history of man .
As a consequence , some conservatives are actively supporting the effort to strip from these social media giants the Section 230 protections that they certainly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal , these social media giants need to be held legally accountable for content on their own sites .
But 230 protects companies from lawsuits when publishing the content of others .
This has given Big Tech firms like Facebook the power to block conservatives from the public conversation while encouraging hate-filled , dishonest speech toward conservatives — all with virtual impunity .
U.S .
Senators Roger Wicker ( R. , MI ) , Lindsey Graham ( R. , SC ) , and Marsha Blackburn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ legislation that “ would clarify the original intent of the law and increase accountability for content moderation practices.
” Others , including 51 state attorneys general , are exploring antitrust remedies to break the monopolies and allow competition that might embrace free speech .
These are very encouraging steps in the right direction .
But there might be an easier solution to resolve at least part of the problem : let ’ s fix fact-checking .
Silicon Valley , its allies in the “ old ” media , and the academy are the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ public .
There ’ s no market demand for any corporate fact-checking .
None .
This is not to suggest that social media sites shouldn ’ t be monitored , and restrictions placed on them .
But those restrictions should be imposed only where absolutely necessary and legally required in cases of criminal activity , terrorism , and pornography .
That should be the full extent of Big Tech ’ s direct involvement in the fact-checking process .
Let the public make the call : allow them to opt in to fact-checking .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ A task force would produce a simple document outlining what can and will be banned by the social media community .
Every company will be asked to sign the charter .
• Demand Equal Fact-Checkers : Each social media company would recruit a set number of official fact-checkers — say , ten .
These fact-checkers would run the political gamut and share in valuing true diversity of thought .
For every leftist enterprise there would be a conservative alternative .
Any existing “ fact-checking ” operations would need to disclose their true bias @ @ @ @ @ @ @ • Insist on Transparency : Each fact-checking organization would be required to fill out a Transparency Statement , to include the organization ’ s official mission statement and describe all other organizational activities , political affiliations , sources of major funding and the qualifications of all staff participating in their operation .
• Pay Fact-Checkers : As cable companies do with C-SPAN , so too would the social media giants fund these fact-checking organizations as a public service .
Fact-checkers would be paid their salaries a year in advance , just as ombudsmen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ interference .
• Publicize Options : Social media companies would prominently list the names of all fact-checkers and encourage their audiences to read them .
• Track Actions : Social media companies would agree to maintain a public log of all disciplinary action taken by the companies against users , be they personal or corporate .
• Impose Biannual Oversight : A blue-ribbon “ Oversight Board ” would be convened biannually to review these fact-checkers .
If the Oversight Board determined a fact-checker ’ s record to be unacceptable , it could terminate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
• Limit Fact-checks : Fact-checks wouldn ’ t be used to shut down , suspend , or in any other way discipline users or organizations .
They would be attached to stories for the users who opted in .
They would provide additional information , not censor by dictate .
This will naturally require tweaking , but the outline ought to provide satisfaction for all parties .
Social media sites will become self-policing communities ; freedom of speech will be guaranteed , warts and all ; conservatives will have the assurance they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ; and the reasons for legal or legislative action against these social media giants will be minimized , if not negated altogether .
In other words , one piece of the debate just might be resolved by the private sector , for the private sector .
And maybe liberals will get back to defending free speech , as they once did .
By L. Brent Bozell III , founder and president of the Media Research Center .

The war between conservatives and Silicon Valley is on. The scions of social media are no longer hiding their disdain for an entire movement.
They know the outcome of this high-stakes presidential election could jeopardize their rule over the American people and unmake the oligarchy they’ve built with the rest of the ruling class. If we are to save the republic, we must realize this too — and act.
Tens of millions of individual users who dare question leftist orthodoxy are being targeted and silenced by Big Tech. There are no limits on who they censor, including the President of the United States.
That’s why the Media Research Center is fighting back with the Free Speech Alliance, which includes over 70 groups and The Claremont Institute. We also just released our database effort to document the bias at CensorTrack.org.
One key weapon being deployed to punish conservatives is the so-called “fact check.” It’s being used to censor thousands of conservatives communicating with millions of followers. It’s happened tens of thousands of times, and it’s getting worse. Facebook is one of the worst offenders.
Facebook, with 2.7 billion users, is dramatically skewed to the left in its fact-checking operation.
It now has an international “Oversight Committee” dominated by George Soros-funded entities that make a mockery of unbiased review.
Citizens wanting to rally in support of reopening the country have been banned because some public gatherings in some states are forbidden.
Antifa, however, thrives largely unchecked and unchallenged as it riots in the streets and harasses members of Congress in their homes.
Conservatives have made good-faith attempts to resolve these many conflicts, but to no avail.
Covid-19 has sent social media sites into censorship overdrive. If you disagree with the social media prescription for the virus, you are silenced. Ask the president, or his son, or countless doctors.
Social media censorship is the most direct threat to free speech worldwide coming from the most powerful companies in the history of man.
As a consequence, some conservatives are actively supporting the effort to strip from these social media giants the Section 230 protections that they certainly have abused.
Just like newspapers such as The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal, these social media giants need to be held legally accountable for content on their own sites. But 230 protects companies from lawsuits when publishing the content of others.
This has given Big Tech firms like Facebook the power to block conservatives from the public conversation while encouraging hate-filled, dishonest speech toward conservatives — all with virtual impunity.
Taking Action
U.S. Senators Roger Wicker (R., MI), Lindsey Graham (R., SC), and Marsha Blackburn (R., TN) have proposed legislation that “would clarify the original intent of the law and increase accountability for content moderation practices.”
Others, including 51 state attorneys general, are exploring antitrust remedies to break the monopolies and allow competition that might embrace free speech.
These are very encouraging steps in the right direction.
But there might be an easier solution to resolve at least part of the problem: let’s fix fact-checking.
Silicon Valley, its allies in the “old” media, and the academy are the ones clamoring for fact-checking, not the public.
There’s no market demand for any corporate fact-checking. None.
This is not to suggest that social media sites shouldn’t be monitored, and restrictions placed on them. But those restrictions should be imposed only where absolutely necessary and legally required in cases of criminal activity, terrorism, and pornography.
That should be the full extent of Big Tech’s direct involvement in the fact-checking process.
Let the public make the call: allow them to opt in to fact-checking.
We offer a simple framework:
Create a Social Media Charter: A task force would produce a simple document outlining what can and will be banned by the social media community. Every company will be asked to sign the charter. Demand Equal Fact-Checkers: Each social media company would recruit a set number of official fact-checkers — say, ten. These fact-checkers would run the political gamut and share in valuing true diversity of thought. For every leftist enterprise there would be a conservative alternative. Any existing “fact-checking” operations would need to disclose their true bias. Pure objectivity does not exist. Insist on Transparency: Each fact-checking organization would be required to fill out a Transparency Statement, to include the organization’s official mission statement and describe all other organizational activities, political affiliations, sources of major funding and the qualifications of all staff participating in their operation. Pay Fact-Checkers: As cable companies do with C-SPAN, so too would the social media giants fund these fact-checking organizations as a public service. Fact-checkers would be paid their salaries a year in advance, just as ombudsmen are, to mitigate against any possible interference. Publicize Options: Social media companies would prominently list the names of all fact-checkers and encourage their audiences to read them. Track Actions: Social media companies would agree to maintain a public log of all disciplinary action taken by the companies against users, be they personal or corporate. Impose Biannual Oversight: A blue-ribbon “Oversight Board” would be convened biannually to review these fact-checkers. If the Oversight Board determined a fact-checker’s record to be unacceptable, it could terminate the contract while recruiting a similar replacement. Limit Fact-checks: Fact-checks wouldn’t be used to shut down, suspend, or in any other way discipline users or organizations. They would be attached to stories for the users who opted in. They would provide additional information, not censor by dictate.
This will naturally require tweaking, but the outline ought to provide satisfaction for all parties.
Social media sites will become self-policing communities; freedom of speech will be guaranteed, warts and all; conservatives will have the assurance they are no longer being targeted for censorship; and the reasons for legal or legislative action against these social media giants will be minimized, if not negated altogether.
In other words, one piece of the debate just might be resolved by the private sector, for the private sector. And maybe liberals will get back to defending free speech, as they once did.
By L. Brent Bozell III, founder and president of the Media Research Center.


humansarefree--2020-09-27--‘Time for Bed’ Says Corona: Rules Tighten in the UK, with Talk of Curfews and National Lockdown

The numbers of positive tests – henceforth to be known as ‘ cases ’ apparently – has recently EXPLODED , coincidentally after a lot of testing has been done .
Has the false positive rate of the tests been taken into account ?
Who really knows , but we suspect not .
And all over again , we sit and wait for Euromomo to update once a week… heart in mouth , in a way no population has ever done before .
Yet this is where our attention has been inexpertly directed for a second time , and if it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time it feels like death warmed over ( if you ’ ll excuse the pun ) .
Meanwhile , as most will be aware , on Tuesday 22nd September Boris Johnson announced some new rules to ‘ address ’ this situation .
To be honest , they seem more like a random list of tweaked parameters in a piece of modelling software than any sort of practical or logical method of combatting an epidemic .
The new guidelines involve reducing the numbers of people who can attend weddings to 15 , introducing a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ serve food and drink , as well as encouraging people to work from home .
Masks must now be worn in cabs , employees in ‘ close contact services ’ are now legally required to mask up , presumably this includes retail and hospitality etc .
Businesses will need to display the NHS QR code , and will face stricter rules to make their premises ‘ COVID Secure ’ , including fines of up to £10,000 for ‘ repeated breaches ’ .
The penalty fine for not wearing a mask or observing the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up to £200 for a first offence .
You must also wear a mask unless you are seated at a table within pubs and restaurants .
You can now only receive table service in pubs and restaurants , although this was later clarified to mean ‘ licensed ’ premises , so have no fear , this does not apply to McDonalds !
Once seated at a restaurant table , I am curious as to how one is supposed to observe proper procedure for safely removing a face covering , once one is confined @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t leave the table without a mask… I guess one should probably bring multiple masks , multiple gloves , a container suitable for hazardous material and perhaps they ’ ll wheel the hand sanitiser over with the condiments ?
It ’ s lucky this is a play-pretend sort of apocalypse/furloughed holiday , where we don ’ t really have to feel in any danger and the rules don ’ t really have to make any sense .
Oh , and apparently the UK government expect these measures to be in place for 6 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and national lockdowns to follow .
No mention of the elderly people these measures are supposedly protecting , I guess they ’ ll stay locked up for Christmas , if they manage to stay the right side of the NICE scoring system till then .
James Donald , please play us out .

The numbers of positive tests – henceforth to be known as ‘cases’ apparently – has recently EXPLODED, coincidentally after a lot of testing has been done.
Has the false positive rate of the tests been taken into account? Who really knows, but we suspect not.
And all over again, we sit and wait for Euromomo to update once a week… heart in mouth, in a way no population has ever done before.
Yet this is where our attention has been inexpertly directed for a second time, and if it felt laboured the first time, this time it feels like death warmed over (if you’ll excuse the pun).
Meanwhile, as most will be aware, on Tuesday 22nd September Boris Johnson announced some new rules to ‘address’ this situation.
To be honest, they seem more like a random list of tweaked parameters in a piece of modelling software than any sort of practical or logical method of combatting an epidemic.
The new guidelines involve reducing the numbers of people who can attend weddings to 15, introducing a 10pm closing time for all places which serve food and drink, as well as encouraging people to work from home.
Masks must now be worn in cabs, employees in ‘close contact services’ are now legally required to mask up, presumably this includes retail and hospitality etc.
Businesses will need to display the NHS QR code, and will face stricter rules to make their premises ‘COVID Secure’, including fines of up to £10,000 for ‘repeated breaches’.
The penalty fine for not wearing a mask or observing the ‘rule of six’ has gone up to £200 for a first offence.
You must also wear a mask unless you are seated at a table within pubs and restaurants.
You can now only receive table service in pubs and restaurants, although this was later clarified to mean ‘licensed’ premises, so have no fear, this does not apply to McDonalds!
Once seated at a restaurant table, I am curious as to how one is supposed to observe proper procedure for safely removing a face covering, once one is confined to the table area and mustn’t leave the table without a mask…
I guess one should probably bring multiple masks, multiple gloves, a container suitable for hazardous material and perhaps they’ll wheel the hand sanitiser over with the condiments?
It’s lucky this is a play-pretend sort of apocalypse/furloughed holiday, where we don’t really have to feel in any danger and the rules don’t really have to make any sense.
Oh, and apparently the UK government expect these measures to be in place for 6 months, amidst hints at potential curfews and national lockdowns to follow.
No mention of the elderly people these measures are supposedly protecting, I guess they’ll stay locked up for Christmas, if they manage to stay the right side of the NICE scoring system till then.
James Donald, please play us out.
Source: Off-Guardian.org


humansarefree--2020-09-27--German Professor Arrested After Speaking At ‘We Do Not Consent’ Rally in London

After Metropolitan Police claimed they would only crack down on marchers flagrantly violating social distancing rules ( though the hated “ rule of six ” had been suspended due to the gathering ’ s “ protest ” status ) , German professor Dr. Heiko Schoening was arrested by a gang of British officers – he was filmed being loaded into a paddy wagon – after speaking out against using tactics like economy-destroying mandatory lockdowns during yesterday ’ s “ We Do Not Consent ” rally in London .
Video of the arrest was shared on Twitter .
Several purported bystanders @ @ @ @ @ @ @ appears to have gone largely unnoticed .
Here ’ s video of the doctor speaking to a reporter at the event yesterday .
This was filmed before he was arrested .
The rally was organized by groups opposing a second lockdown in the UK , along with mandatory vaccination efforts by the government once a vaccine is approved .
The doctor was pat of a group of hundreds of German doctors and scientists who have signed on to investigate and analyze whether the heavy handed measures favored by governments to combat the virus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the professor claimed that his wife was calling supporters to attend a peaceful demonstration on Sunday outside Wandsworth police station ( 146 Wandsworth High St ) .

After Metropolitan Police claimed they would only crack down on marchers flagrantly violating social distancing rules (though the hated “rule of six” had been suspended due to the gathering’s “protest” status), German professor Dr. Heiko Schoening was arrested by a gang of British officers – he was filmed being loaded into a paddy wagon – after speaking out against using tactics like economy-destroying mandatory lockdowns during yesterday’s “We Do Not Consent” rally in London.
Video of the arrest was shared on Twitter.
LONDON – Respected German Doctor Heiko Schöning was arrested by Met Police for speaking about Covid-19. pic.twitter.com/RmU5705hi3 — ShatteredWorldMedia (@MediaShattered) September 27, 2020
Several purported bystanders tweeted in protest, by the story appears to have gone largely unnoticed.
Dr. Heiko Schöning has just been arrested and put into a police van @garethicke Shame on the UK #FacismIsHere https://t.co/DVTsecfu38 — Medea Matters (@Medea_Matters) September 26, 2020
Here’s video of the doctor speaking to a reporter at the event yesterday. This was filmed before he was arrested.
German Doctor Dr. Heiko Schöning was arrested yesterday, he has not been charged but is still being held in custody. When doctors speak out the truth and are silenced, locked up, you know we are in deep deep trouble.pic.twitter.com/JMAytuyWiC — Darren of Plymouth 🇬🇧 (@DarrenPlymouth) September 27, 2020
The rally was organized by groups opposing a second lockdown in the UK, along with mandatory vaccination efforts by the government once a jjab is approved.
The doctor was pat of a group of hundreds of German doctors and scientists who have signed on to investigate and analyze whether the heavy handed measures favored by governments to combat the virus were the appropriate response.
Purported friends of the professor claimed that his wife was calling supporters to attend a peaceful demonstration on Sunday outside Wandsworth police station (146 Wandsworth High St).
Source: ZeroHedge.com


humansarefree--2020-09-27--French President in UN Speech: We Should Prepare for the New World Order

“ The COVID crisis , the collapse of our cooperation frameworks , the weaknesses that I have just mentioned require us to rebuild a new order and force Europe to take its full share of responsibility , ” Emmanuel Macron said Tuesday .
As we have been telling you , Emmanuel Macron is our pick for the biblical ‘ man of sin ’ , and on Tuesday at the United Nations General Assembly , he didn ’ t disappoint .
Macron stood up before the Assembly , virtually of course , and delivered an absolute perfect speech .
Perfect , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ King James bible believer who loves end times prophecy .
As we said , Macron did not disappoint .
The fact that the United Nations even exists is the fulfillment of bible prophecy , where it is specifically mentioned .
“ Therefore wait ye upon me , saith the LORD , until the day that I rise up to the prey : for my determination is to gather the nations , that I may assemble the kingdoms , to pour upon them mine indignation , even all my fierce anger : for all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fire of my jealousy.
” Zephaniah 3:8 ( KJB ) The prophet Zephaniah tells of a time , far in the future from his day , where amazingly God would ‘ gather all the nations ’ of the world in an ‘ assembly ’ , and that they would be gathered for the purpose of judgment being poured down on them .
This prophecy is so on the money that the official name of the UN is the United Nations General Assembly , exactly as Zephaniah had foretold .
The judgment of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the time of Jacob ’ s trouble , during the great Tribulation , when under the leadership of Emmanuel Macon , umm , wait , I mean… Antichrist , all the nations of the world will come against Israel .
It will be the last thing they ever do as a group .

“The COVID crisis, the collapse of our cooperation frameworks, the weaknesses that I have just mentioned require us to rebuild a new order and force Europe to take its full share of responsibility,” Emmanuel Macron said Tuesday.
As we have been telling you, Emmanuel Macron is our pick for the biblical ‘man of sin’, and on Tuesday at the United Nations General Assembly, he didn’t disappoint.
Macron stood up before the Assembly, virtually of course, and delivered an absolute perfect speech. Perfect, that is, if you are a King James bible believer who loves end times prophecy.
As we said, Macron did not disappoint. The fact that the United Nations even exists is the fulfillment of bible prophecy, where it is specifically mentioned.
“Therefore wait ye upon me, saith the LORD, until the day that I rise up to the prey: for my determination is to gather the nations, that I may assemble the kingdoms, to pour upon them mine indignation, even all my fierce anger: for all the earth shall be devoured with the fire of my jealousy.” Zephaniah 3:8 (KJB)
The prophet Zephaniah tells of a time, far in the future from his day, where amazingly God would ‘gather all the nations’ of the world in an ‘assembly’, and that they would be gathered for the purpose of judgment being poured down on them.
This prophecy is so on the money that the official name of the UN is the United Nations General Assembly, exactly as Zephaniah had foretold.
The judgment of the UN will come in the second half of the time of Jacob’s trouble, during the great Tribulation, when under the leadership of Emmanuel Macon, umm, wait, I mean… Antichrist, all the nations of the world will come against Israel. It will be the last thing they ever do as a group.
Source: Nowtheendbegins.com


humansarefree--2020-09-27--Climate Lockdown: The Post-Human Future

Climate Lockdown: The Post-Human Future

A “ Climate Lockdown , ” to extend into perpetuity , reveals the true nature of # COVID1984 : Normalization @ @ @ @ @ “ climate tracing ” and now “ climate lockdown ” as technocrats shove society towards @ @ @ @ @ hand is forced as the Global Warming narrative breaks down and the Modern Grand Solar @ @ @ @ @ their panic , they are seizing for total control – we are at a demarcation @ @ @ @ @ now , or forever lose the opportunity .

A “Climate Lockdown,” to extend into perpetuity, reveals the true nature of #COVID1984:
Normalization of the police state, “climate tracing” and now “climate lockdown” as technocrats shove society towards their post-human future.
Their hand is forced as the Global Warming narrative breaks down and the Modern Grand Solar Minimum goes mainstream.
In their panic, they are seizing for total control – we are at a demarcation point: we either fight now, or forever lose the opportunity.
Via YouTube.com


humansarefree--2020-09-28--Biological Weapons Expert: COVID-19 is Bioterrorism

A new book by Senior Indian Police officer and Biological Weapons expert claims COVID-19 is Bioterrorism .
Dr Sharad S. Chauhan is a decorated Indian Police Service ( IPS ) officer awarded the Prime Minister ’ s baton and the Home Minister ’ s Revolver .
He is also a Gold Medallist MBBS Doctor from Delhi University with a PhD in Bioterrorism .
He also authored the book Biological Weapons .
The book titled COVID-19 – Opportunistic Bioterrorism ?
A Virus from China set to Change World History , traverses the early stages of the COVID-19 epidemic in China with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the coronavirus , the timeline of events and administrative reactions of the Chinese to the virus .
The book examines this in the backdrop of the experiments conducted by Chinese researchers on SARS like coronaviruses for more than a decade and the state of the Chinese economy preceding the outbreak .
In the process of doing so the book defines the concept of opportunistic bioterrorism for the first time .
The author relies on scientific and open source intelligence to scrutinize evidence with the expertise gained as a medical graduate and a police @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in China near the end of 2019 is now a global calamity .
The rampaging COVID-19 pandemic has changed the world as never before , the great wars and pandemics of past included .
The strategic , geopolitical and geo-economics consequences of COVID-19 are slowly unfolding .
The virus from China is set to change the world .
The book also raises 101 critical questions on COVID-19 .
The questionnaire appended is a judicious mix of both clarifying and probing questions and valuable in and of itself , irrespective of the answer to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The controversial issue pertaining to the laboratory origins of the virus is kept out of the main text as an Appendix .
The book is a single source reference for all contentious issues relating to the COVID 19 pandemic .

A new book by Senior Indian Police officer and Biological Weapons expert claims COVID-19 is Bioterrorism.
Dr Sharad S. Chauhan is a decorated Indian Police Service (IPS) officer awarded the Prime Minister’s baton and the Home Minister’s Revolver.
He is also a Gold Medallist MBBS Doctor from Delhi University with a PhD in Bioterrorism. He also authored the book Biological Weapons.
The book titled COVID-19 – Opportunistic Bioterrorism? A Virus from China set to Change World History, traverses the early stages of the COVID-19 epidemic in China with a special emphasis on the origins of the coronavirus, the timeline of events and administrative reactions of the Chinese to the virus.
The book examines this in the backdrop of the experiments conducted by Chinese researchers on SARS like coronaviruses for more than a decade and the state of the Chinese economy preceding the outbreak.
EXPOSED Italian state media Rai – Radiotelevisione Italiana in 2015 exposed Chinese Biological Experiments with #Coronavirus to make it infect humans.https://t.co/oMc63Pcbxd — GreatGameIndia (@GreatGameIndia) March 30, 2020
In the process of doing so the book defines the concept of opportunistic bioterrorism for the first time.
The author relies on scientific and open source intelligence to scrutinize evidence with the expertise gained as a medical graduate and a police officer.
What started as an outbreak in China near the end of 2019 is now a global calamity. The rampaging COVID-19 pandemic has changed the world as never before, the great wars and pandemics of past included.
The strategic, geopolitical and geo-economics consequences of COVID-19 are slowly unfolding. The virus from China is set to change the world.
The book also raises 101 critical questions on COVID-19.
The questionnaire appended is a judicious mix of both clarifying and probing questions and valuable in and of itself, irrespective of the answer to facilitate effective deliberation on the topic.
The controversial issue pertaining to the laboratory origins of the virus is kept out of the main text as an Appendix.
The book is a single source reference for all contentious issues relating to the COVID 19 pandemic.
Source: GreatGameIndia.com


humansarefree--2020-09-28--Food Shortages Are Already HERE: The Supply Chain Is Broken

If you are a reader of this site , you might be more interested in the food supply chain than most , at least when things are good .
So , if you have been paying attention recently , you might find that there have been some severe disturbances in that supply chain .
Several months ago , the immediate disruptions began at the beginning of the COVID-19 hysteria , when factories , distribution centers , and even farms shut down under the pretext of “ flattening the curve.
” As a result , Americans found necessities were missing on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ years .
Items like hand sanitizer and Clorox wipes were , of course , out of stock .
Soon other items became noticeably missing as well .
People began to notice meat , and even canned vegetables and rice were soon missing from the shelves .
Most of this was simply the result of mass panic buying , although “ preppers ” were blamed for “ hoarding.
” Therefore , people who had not been prepping all along and were suddenly caught with their pants down .
But that ’ s not the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and slaughterhouses shut down due to intrusive totalitarian government reactions to an alleged pandemic .
Combined with panic buying , those facilities ’ ability to replace what was bought up was drastically reduced .
As a result , consumers were forced to wait weeks before buying what they needed ( or wanted ) again .
Even then , they had to show up in the morning .
We are still experiencing those shortages , though better hidden .
As anyone who shops regularly can tell you , you can find what you need @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to three stores to get it , where one would have done in the past .
In this article , you ’ ll find some advice about dealing with the limited varieties of inventory that people are currently noticing at stores .
War launched on the economy by state governments put millions of Americans out of work .
Now , when most rational people would be happy to have a job at all amid such high unemployment , they were prepared to stop the machine ’ s wheels from working .
Workers suddenly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ walk off the job conveniently when the food supply was already broken .
Of course , these workers had not organized or initiated a strike at any time before when working conditions were bleak , and wages were low .
While extraordinary times beget extraordinary reactions , the timing of the newfound sense of workers ’ resolve can not go unnoticed .
At the same time , we witnessed farms dumping thousands of gallons of milk down the drain , meat producers slaughtering animals and burying them , and farmers destroying crops all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The reason for this is two-fold .
First , many major producers would not want a glut of their product on the market and see their prices dropdown .
Second , with the totalitarian measures forcing the shut down of restaurants across the country , many farms and producers lost a massive part of their market , thus destroying it .
A government genuinely concerned with its people ’ s health would have bought that produce and either distributed it or freeze-dried and stored it for the coming apocalypse .
Indeed , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ minor success and high cost .
Food banks at least benefited .
But the damage to the food supply was already done .
And then came the winds .
As time moved forward , we saw devastating straight-line winds blow across places like Iowa , destroying massive amounts of crops and farming infrastructure , effects rarely advertised on mainstream media outlets .
Following those winds , we saw massive wildfires along the West Coast ’ s entirety from Washington to California and as far east as Colorado , South Dakota , and Texas @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the map at fires seemingly heading east , burning up prairies and farmland all along the way to see that the food chain will experience yet even more hiccups once the smoke has cleared .
But while leftists claim the fires are the natural result of “ climate change ” and conservatives blame lack of adequate forest management ( which has some merit ) , both completely ignore the fact that close to ten people were arrested for setting these fires .
Repeatedly , arsonists are being arrested for starting blazes though @ @ @ @ @ @ @ us who have studied history , however , can speculate with some certainty .
Absolute must-read on the subject : Directed Energy Weapons ( DEW ) Seem To Be Starting Fires In California And Oregon But these problems are not unique to the United States .
Countries all over the world are experiencing supply chain problems .
Australia , for instance , is about to run out of its domestic rice supply by December entirely .
Now , here we are , with winter fast approaching and the food supply decimated .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ masked and terrified of getting within six feet of another human , and the cities all across America are on fire with violent riots .
Communists and the inevitable response are clashing in the streets and threatening to turn in to a possible American Civil War 2.0 .
What role will hunger play in this scenario ?
At the moment , we can ’ t say for sure .
But what we can say with certainty is that this will be a very long , very trying winter .
Food shortages are coming @ @ @ @ @ @ @ far away .
You do not have much time left before the items you can grab now are gone and gone for good .
Here are some tips for shopping when there aren ’ t many supplies left on the shelves , and here ’ s a list of things that are usually imported from China that we haven ’ t been receiving in the same quantities ( if at all ) since the crisis began .
Many of the readers of this website will be prepared , no doubt , but others @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we advise you to prepare – but we also advise you to be ready for the unprepared .

by Robert Wheeler
If you are a reader of this site, you might be more interested in the food supply chain than most, at least when things are good. So, if you have been paying attention recently, you might find that there have been some severe disturbances in that supply chain.
Several months ago, the immediate disruptions began at the beginning of the COVID-19 hysteria, when factories, distribution centers, and even farms shut down under the pretext of “flattening the curve.”
As a result, Americans found necessities were missing on the shelves for the first time in years. Items like hand sanitizer and Clorox wipes were, of course, out of stock.
Soon other items became noticeably missing as well.
People began to notice meat, and even canned vegetables and rice were soon missing from the shelves.
Most of this was simply the result of mass panic buying, although “preppers” were blamed for “hoarding.”
Therefore, people who had not been prepping all along and were suddenly caught with their pants down.
But that’s not the whole story.
Manufacturing and packaging facilities and slaughterhouses shut down due to intrusive totalitarian government reactions to an alleged pandemic.
Combined with panic buying, those facilities’ ability to replace what was bought up was drastically reduced.
As a result, consumers were forced to wait weeks before buying what they needed (or wanted) again. Even then, they had to show up in the morning.
We are still experiencing those shortages, though better hidden.
As anyone who shops regularly can tell you, you can find what you need, but you may have to go to three stores to get it, where one would have done in the past.
In this article, you’ll find some advice about dealing with the limited varieties of inventory that people are currently noticing at stores.
War launched on the economy by state governments put millions of Americans out of work.
Now, when most rational people would be happy to have a job at all amid such high unemployment, they were prepared to stop the machine’s wheels from working.
Workers suddenly started to organize, strike, and walk off the job conveniently when the food supply was already broken.
Of course, these workers had not organized or initiated a strike at any time before when working conditions were bleak, and wages were low.
While extraordinary times beget extraordinary reactions, the timing of the newfound sense of workers’ resolve cannot go unnoticed.
At the same time, we witnessed farms dumping thousands of gallons of milk down the drain, meat producers slaughtering animals and burying them, and farmers destroying crops all over the country and the world.
The reason for this is two-fold.
First, many major producers would not want a glut of their product on the market and see their prices dropdown.
Second, with the totalitarian measures forcing the shut down of restaurants across the country, many farms and producers lost a massive part of their market, thus destroying it.
A government genuinely concerned with its people’s health would have bought that produce and either distributed it or freeze-dried and stored it for the coming apocalypse.
Indeed, the Trump administration attempted this with some very minor success and high cost. Food banks at least benefited. But the damage to the food supply was already done.
And then came the winds.
As time moved forward, we saw devastating straight-line winds blow across places like Iowa, destroying massive amounts of crops and farming infrastructure, effects rarely advertised on mainstream media outlets.
Following those winds, we saw massive wildfires along the West Coast’s entirety from Washington to California and as far east as Colorado, South Dakota, and Texas.
One need only take a look at the map at fires seemingly heading east, burning up prairies and farmland all along the way to see that the food chain will experience yet even more hiccups once the smoke has cleared.
But while leftists claim the fires are the natural result of “climate change” and conservatives blame lack of adequate forest management (which has some merit), both completely ignore the fact that close to ten people were arrested for setting these fires.
Repeatedly, arsonists are being arrested for starting blazes though the motive is unclear. Those of us who have studied history, however, can speculate with some certainty.
Absolute must-read on the subject: Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) Seem To Be Starting Fires In California And Oregon
But these problems are not unique to the United States.
Countries all over the world are experiencing supply chain problems.
Australia, for instance, is about to run out of its domestic rice supply by December entirely.
Now, here we are, with winter fast approaching and the food supply decimated.
The world’s population is walking around masked and terrified of getting within six feet of another human, and the cities all across America are on fire with violent riots.
Communists and the inevitable response are clashing in the streets and threatening to turn in to a possible American Civil War 2.0.
What role will hunger play in this scenario?
At the moment, we can’t say for sure.
But what we can say with certainty is that this will be a very long, very trying winter.
Food shortages are coming, and they aren’t too far away.
You do not have much time left before the items you can grab now are gone and gone for good.
Here are some tips for shopping when there aren’t many supplies left on the shelves, and here’s a list of things that are usually imported from China that we haven’t been receiving in the same quantities (if at all) since the crisis began.
Many of the readers of this website will be prepared, no doubt, but others won’t. Not only do we advise you to prepare – but we also advise you to be ready for the unprepared.