humansarefree--2020-12-27--The ‘SPARS PANDEMIC 2025-2028’ Simulation of Oct. 2017 Details a New Coronavirus PLANdemic That Will

The ‘SPARS PANDEMIC 2025-2028’ Simulation of Oct. 2017 Details a New Coronavirus PLANdemic That Will Follow COVID-19

What is the ‘ SPARS Pandemic 2025 – 2028 ’ Simulation ?
The “ SPARS Pandemic 2025 – 2028 – A Futuristic Scenario for Public Health Risk Communicators ” ( back-up here ) was a simulation at The Johns Hopkins University , back in October of 2017 .
And we all know by now what happens to simulations – they become real .
It mentions a new virus that will infect mankind in 2025 , and it will last until 2028 .
According to the World Bank , COVID-19 ( SARS-CoV-2 ) is a “ project ” that is planned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2025 .
As soon as COVID-19 will over , in the spring of 2025 , a new Coronavirus PLANdemic will start in the fall of the same year .
In this simulation , they chose the name SPARS , based on the city where it first appeared ( St. Paul ) , but they will probably go with a different name when the time comes .
It is interesting to note that SPARS is going to be a new coronavirus , which means COVID-19 “ project ” is never going away .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ THE PEOPLE allow it to continue .
The SPARS PANDEMIC 2025 – 2028 simulation also mentions that in 2021 the coronavirus will mutate to animals in South-East Asia , which will need to be sacrificed in order to stop the mutation .
We ’ ve already seen this many times in the past , with various plandemics .
Rounding up animals in poor countries and sacrificing them to stop an alleged virus mutation results in poverty and famine in those regions , and only God-knows how many human deaths .
In the 2017 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COROVAX ( and which is also called CORAVAX once in the paper ) is proposed as the solution to stop the pandemic .
Strangely enough , a vaccine named CORAVAX was developed in real life almost three years later by Matthias Schnell , PhD , Director of the Jefferson Vaccine Center .
Also , a company called COROVAX LTD was incorporated on March 12th , 2020 , in the UK , by the British professor Angus George Dalgleish , who is famous for his HIV/AIDS research .
I don ’ t know if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I thought it was interesting enough to mention , since it has been long speculated that SARS-CoV-2 has been manmade and spliced with HIV in order to become more infectious .
It is , of course , very plausible ( and probable ) that professor Dalgleish decided to start working on a vaccine for COVID-19 and chose the name COROVAX for his company , because that ’ s what it does : a coronavirus vaccine .
Nevertheless , the coincidence is striking .
As for the probability of SARS-CoV-2 being manmade and spliced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ excerpt : Many in the scientific community were shocked when the acclaimed Luc Antoine Montagnier appeared on the French cable TV show , CNews , on April 17 , 2020 to say that the virus that causes COVID-19 is manmade and that elements of HIV and Plasmodium falciparum , a parasite that causes malaria , are found in the coronavirus ’ s genome .
“ We were not the first since a group of Indian researchers tried to publish a study which showed that the complete genome of this coronavirus [ has ] @ @ @ @ @ @ @ HIV.
” The research that Montagnier refers to was posted on the science website Biorxiv January 31 , 2020 , and has since been withdrawn .
“ We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein ( S ) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses .
Importantly , amino acid residues in all the 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 gp120 or HIV-1 Gag … The finding of 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV , all of which have identity /similarity to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature.
” ( Source ) The video also mentiones a company named CODEX DNA , which promisses to be the solution to the COVID-19 plandemic .
They are selling a device called “ Synthetic biology workstation.
” The device is called BioXp™ and it is capable of “ building biology , ” which sounds a lot like cloning to me .
And if you read the description , that ’ s exactly what it claims to do : “ Say hello to the BioXp™ system @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for synthesized genes .
The BioXp™ system is the world ’ s first and only synthetic biology workstation for building libraries , gene fragments , clones , and more.
” So what is the purpose of all this ?
Why are they doing it ?
Ultimate Proof : Covid-19 Was Planned To Usher In The New World Order Watch everything mentioned here and some more in the video below .
Diana Lenska ’ s video is being supressed .
Let ’ s make this thing go viral :

What is the ‘SPARS Pandemic 2025 – 2028’ Simulation?
The “SPARS Pandemic 2025 – 2028 – A Futuristic Scenario for Public Health Risk Communicators” (back-up here) was a simulation at The Johns Hopkins University, back in October of 2017. And we all know by now what happens to simulations – they become real.
It mentions a new virus that will infect mankind in 2025, and it will last until 2028.
According to the World Bank, COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) is a “project” that is planned to continue until the end of March 2025.
Here’s a screenshot below (source and back-up):
As soon as COVID-19 will over, in the spring of 2025, a new Coronavirus PLANdemic will start in the fall of the same year. In this simulation, they chose the name SPARS, based on the city where it first appeared (St. Paul), but they will probably go with a different name when the time comes.
It is interesting to note that SPARS is going to be a new coronavirus, which means COVID-19 “project” is never going away. It will continue for as long as WE THE PEOPLE allow it to continue.
The SPARS PANDEMIC 2025 – 2028 simulation also mentions that in 2021 the coronavirus will mutate to animals in South-East Asia, which will need to be sacrificed in order to stop the mutation.
We’ve already seen this many times in the past, with various plandemics. Rounding up animals in poor countries and sacrificing them to stop an alleged virus mutation results in poverty and famine in those regions, and only God-knows how many human deaths.
In the 2017 “simulation,” a jjab called COROVAX (and which is also called CORAVAX once in the paper) is proposed as the solution to stop the pandemic. Strangely enough, a jjab named CORAVAX was developed in real life almost three years later by Matthias Schnell, PhD, Director of the Jefferson Vaccine Center.
Also, a company called COROVAX LTD was incorporated on March 12th, 2020, in the UK, by the British professor Angus George Dalgleish, who is famous for his HIV/AIDS research.
I don’t know if there is any connection here, but I thought it was interesting enough to mention, since it has been long speculated that SARS-CoV-2 has been manmade and spliced with HIV in order to become more infectious.
It is, of course, very plausible (and probable) that professor Dalgleish decided to start working on a jjab for COVID-19 and chose the name COROVAX for his company, because that’s what it does: a coronavirus jjab. Nevertheless, the coincidence is striking.
As for the probability of SARS-CoV-2 being manmade and spliced with HIV/AIDS, please read this short excerpt:
Many in the scientific community were shocked when the acclaimed Luc Antoine Montagnier appeared on the French cable TV show, CNews, on April 17, 2020 to say that the virus that causes COVID-19 is manmade and that elements of HIV and Plasmodium falciparum, a parasite that causes malaria, are found in the coronavirus’s genome.
Montagnier said:
“We were not the first since a group of Indian researchers tried to publish a study which showed that the complete genome of this coronavirus [has] sequences of another virus, which is HIV.”
The research that Montagnier refers to was posted on the science website Biorxiv January 31, 2020, and has since been withdrawn.
The researchers wrote:
“We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid residues in all the 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 gp120 or HIV-1 Gag …
The finding of 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV, all of which have identity /similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature.” (Source)
The video also mentiones a company named CODEX DNA, which promisses to be the solution to the COVID-19 plandemic. They are selling a device called “Synthetic biology workstation.” The device is called BioXp™ and it is capable of “building biology,” which sounds a lot like cloning to me.
And if you read the description, that’s exactly what it claims to do:
“Say hello to the BioXp™ system, and say goodbye to waiting weeks for synthesized genes. The BioXp™ system is the world’s first and only synthetic biology workstation for building libraries, gene fragments, clones, and more.”
So what is the purpose of all this? Why are they doing it? Ultimate Proof: Covid-19 Was Planned To Usher In The New World Order
Watch everything mentioned here and some more in the video below. Diana Lenska’s video is being supressed. Let’s make this thing go viral:
 iFrame is not supported!  iFrame is not supported!


humansarefree--2020-12-28--Anthony Fauci Turns Tyrant: COVID-19 Spreads Because Americans Have Too Much Freedom

America ’ s lead immunologist , Dr. Anthony Fauci , has been in government nearly his entire adult life .
Having taken over as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in 1984 , he joined the National Institutes of Health in 1968 — meaning he has been in Washington for more than 50 years .
That ’ s longer than two careers with an average 20-year retirement .
So it ’ s no wonder that Fauci complained in the Washington Post this week that the reason why COVID-19 became a pandemic and spread throughout the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s a virus and that ’ s what viruses do .
No .
It ’ s because Americans are too free .
Too independent .
We have too much liberty .
Asked whether the current spike in coronavirus cases in some parts of the country ( not all ) is to be blamed on our tradition of individualism or President Donald Trump ’ s refusal to impose national mandates ( like masks and stay-at-home orders — it ’ s not even clear he has the constitutional authority to do so ) , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the United States of people not wanting to comply with public health measures has certainly hurt us a bit.
” Got that ?
We are ‘ suffering through this virus ’ because we Americans are just too darned free .
Fauci also went on to complain that too many people continue to treat the virus like a “ hoax.
” “ There are people in various parts of the country who still believe that [ coronavirus ] is a hoax , that it ’ s fake — even when in their own state @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the hospital beds and in the intensive care unit , ” he said .
It ’ s not that the virus is fake — of course it isn ’ t .
What is upsetting and even maddening to an increasing number of Americans is the arbitrary , non-science-related lockdowns , business closures , and other mandates ( like masks ) that clearly aren ’ t mitigating the virus ’ spread but are killing off entire industries and countless small businesses .
Worse , these goofy business-related policies — ‘ the virus can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it ’ ll get ya if you go to a gym or a restaurant ’ — are nonsensical , devastating to business owners , and are being made by government representatives who aren ’ t losing a single dime ’ s worth of income .
Guys like Fauci , for instance .
And millionaire governors and mayors like Bill de Blasio and Andrew Cuomo in New York , and Gavin Newsom in California .
Worse , some of these bozos keep getting caught violating their own lockdowns and COVID mandates requiring the wearing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ How can Americans take these people — and this disease — seriously when those who are making the rules a ) aren ’ t losing any money themselves ; and b ) don ’ t seem to take it serious themselves ?
Nevertheless , Fauci went on to say that Americans should forego celebrating Christmas this year — like he advised against gathering for Thanksgiving , though tens of millions did and there was no ‘ Thanksgiving COVID spike ’ in most regions .
“ They are not going to come home … @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t like that , ” he said .
“ But that ’ s just one of the things you ’ re going to have to accept as we go through this unprecedented challenging time.
” He added : “ You try to explain : You ’ re going to have many more Christmases ahead of you .
You ’ ve enjoyed many more Christmases before .
Maybe this is a time to just say , ‘ This is an unusual situation , it ’ s not going to last forever.
” No @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t ‘ have to accept ’ that we can ’ t see our loved ones during one of our country ’ s most beloved and observed holiday seasons .
Scores of Americans won ’ t be around next Christmas to see their loved ones .
And besides , when did life on earth become a zero-risk endeavor ?
Americans consider and try to mitigate risks every single day — when they decide to get into a vehicle ; take a flight ; get on the subway ; walk down the street ; go @ @ @ @ @ @ @ site of a mass shooting ; etc .
We figure we ’ re smart enough to take into consideration a virus that , despite the fact that most people are doing what they ’ ve been asked to do , is still spreading .
Free people get to make these decisions .
Enslaved people don ’ t .

America’s lead immunologist, Dr. Anthony Fauci, has been in government nearly his entire adult life.
by JD Heyes
Having taken over as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in 1984, he joined the National Institutes of Health in 1968 — meaning he has been in Washington for more than 50 years. That’s longer than two careers with an average 20-year retirement.
So it’s no wonder that Fauci complained in the Washington Post this week that the reason why COVID-19 became a pandemic and spread throughout the United States isn’t because it’s a virus and that’s what viruses do. No.
It’s because Americans are too free. Too independent. We have too much liberty.
Asked whether the current spike in coronavirus cases in some parts of the country (not all) is to be blamed on our tradition of individualism or President Donald Trump’s refusal to impose national mandates (like masks and stay-at-home orders — it’s not even clear he has the constitutional authority to do so), Fauci said the “independent spirit in the United States of people not wanting to comply with public health measures has certainly hurt us a bit.”
Got that? We are ‘suffering through this virus’ because we Americans are just too darned free.
Fauci also went on to complain that too many people continue to treat the virus like a “hoax.”
“There are people in various parts of the country who still believe that [coronavirus] is a hoax, that it’s fake — even when in their own state the hospitals have been overrun with patients in the hospital beds and in the intensive care unit,” he said.
It’s not that the virus is fake — of course it isn’t. What is upsetting and even maddening to an increasing number of Americans is the arbitrary, non-science-related lockdowns, business closures, and other mandates (like masks) that clearly aren’t mitigating the virus’ spread but are killing off entire industries and countless small businesses.
Worse, these goofy business-related policies — ‘the virus can’t hurt you in Walmart but it’ll get ya if you go to a gym or a restaurant’ — are nonsensical, devastating to business owners, and are being made by government representatives who aren’t losing a single dime’s worth of income.
Guys like Fauci, for instance. And millionaire governors and mayors like Bill de Blasio and Andrew Cuomo in New York, and Gavin Newsom in California.
Worse, some of these bozos keep getting caught violating their own lockdowns and COVID mandates requiring the wearing of masks and mandated social distancing.
How can Americans take these people — and this disease — seriously when those who are making the rules a) aren’t losing any money themselves; and b) don’t seem to take it serious themselves?
Nevertheless, Fauci went on to say that Americans should forego celebrating Christmas this year — like he advised against gathering for Thanksgiving, though tens of millions did and there was no ‘Thanksgiving COVID spike’ in most regions.
“They are not going to come home … That’s painful. We don’t like that,” he said. “But that’s just one of the things you’re going to have to accept as we go through this unprecedented challenging time.”
He added: “You try to explain: You’re going to have many more Christmases ahead of you. You’ve enjoyed many more Christmases before. Maybe this is a time to just say, ‘This is an unusual situation, it’s not going to last forever.”
No, Dr. Fauci; we don’t ‘have to accept’ that we can’t see our loved ones during one of our country’s most beloved and observed holiday seasons. Scores of Americans won’t be around next Christmas to see their loved ones.
And besides, when did life on earth become a zero-risk endeavor?
Americans consider and try to mitigate risks every single day — when they decide to get into a vehicle; take a flight; get on the subway; walk down the street; go into a business that might become the site of a mass shooting; etc.
We figure we’re smart enough to take into consideration a virus that, despite the fact that most people are doing what they’ve been asked to do, is still spreading.
Free people get to make these decisions. Enslaved people don’t.


humansarefree--2020-12-27--Twitter Executive Revealed to Be ‘Psyops’ Soldier Linked to Spreading Disinformation Across Social M

Twitter Executive Revealed to Be ‘Psyops’ Soldier Linked to Spreading Disinformation Across Social Media

A Twitter executive with editorial responsibility for the Middle East and North Africa is also a reservist officer of the British Army ’ s psychological warfare and propaganda unit , a new report has revealed .
Gordon MacMillan , who joined Twitter in 2013 and is listed as the company ’ s Head of Editorial for EMEA , also serves with the 77th Brigade — an outfit formed in 2015 to conduct “ information warfare ” and develop “ non-lethal ” ways of conducting war .
The report , published in Britain ’ s Middle East Eye , revealed how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ years .
Twitter has downplayed MacMillian ’ s links to the army and said it supports its staff in their external volunteer commitments .
“ Twitter is an open , neutral , and independent service , ” a spokesperson for Twitter said to Newsweek .
“ We do not allow our data services to be used for surveillance purposes or in any other manner inconsistent with people ’ s expectation of privacy .
Employees who pursue external volunteer opportunities are encouraged to do so in line with company policy.
” “ We proactively @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state-backed foreign information operations on the service — regardless of the source .
We built this industry-leading archive to promote better public understanding of these threats.
” The British Army has also distanced itself from Twitter in a statement .
“ There is no relationship or agreement between 77th Brigade and Twitter , other than using Twitter as one of many social media platforms for engagement and communication , ” a spokesperson said .
“ The Army does not comment on the specific activities of reservists working within the division.
” Despite the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , academics and researchers have said the division between the two is not so clear .
David Miller — a professor of political sociology in the School for Policy Studies at England ’ s University of Bristol , who studies propaganda and public relations efforts concerning the British government — is one such academic .
He told Newsweek he believes a link is there , adding that it was a “ threat to our democracy.
” “ I would say I know a good amount about army propaganda and ‘ psyops ’ operations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what is interesting is how little information we have 77th Brigade , ” he said .
I suppose it means that all their work is covert , but what I would like to know is what they exactly are they doing ?
“ Are they just tracking accounts or are they trying to influence people ’ s views ?
What we do know is that the Brigade has locked its own Twitter account so it can not be seen so we assume they are trying to influence people under the operatives ’ own @ @ @ @ @ @ @ little about exactly what they ’ re doing , we have to look elsewhere for clues for example .
“ If we look at the documents leaked by Edward Snowden about the NSA and its JTRIG [ Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group ] program , we can see that governments are clearly lying and deceiving people by creating troll farms and fake accounts that try to influence the way people think .
“ What the governments will say is that they are trying to prevent radicalization and acts of terrorism , but I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a threat to our democracy .
“ Twitter is also deceiving us because it is not acting as transparently as it could .
If they are working with army personnel in this way , it is extremely damaging to our democracy .
“ Given Twitter ’ s closure of accounts alleged to be used by foreign governments , it ’ s a very hypocritical stance of Twitter to take .
”

A Twitter executive with editorial responsibility for the Middle East and North Africa is also a reservist officer of the British Army’s psychological warfare and propaganda unit, a new report has revealed.
Gordon MacMillan, who joined Twitter in 2013 and is listed as the company’s Head of Editorial for EMEA, also serves with the 77th Brigade — an outfit formed in 2015 to conduct “information warfare” and develop “non-lethal” ways of conducting war.
The report, published in Britain’s Middle East Eye, revealed how MacMillan served with the unit for several years.
Twitter has downplayed MacMillian’s links to the army and said it supports its staff in their external volunteer commitments.
“Twitter is an open, neutral, and independent service,” a spokesperson for Twitter said to Newsweek.
“We do not allow our data services to be used for surveillance purposes or in any other manner inconsistent with people’s expectation of privacy. Employees who pursue external volunteer opportunities are encouraged to do so in line with company policy.”
The spokesperson added:
“We proactively publish all tweets and accounts relating to state-backed foreign information operations on the service — regardless of the source. We built this industry-leading archive to promote better public understanding of these threats.”
The British Army has also distanced itself from Twitter in a statement.
“There is no relationship or agreement between 77th Brigade and Twitter, other than using Twitter as one of many social media platforms for engagement and communication,” a spokesperson said.
“The Army does not comment on the specific activities of reservists working within the division.”
Despite the assertions of Twitter and the British military, academics and researchers have said the division between the two is not so clear.
David Miller — a professor of political sociology in the School for Policy Studies at England’s University of Bristol, who studies propaganda and public relations efforts concerning the British government — is one such academic.
He told Newsweek he believes a link is there, adding that it was a “threat to our democracy.”
“I would say I know a good amount about army propaganda and ‘psyops’ operations as they’re called, but what is interesting is how little information we have 77th Brigade,” he said.
I suppose it means that all their work is covert, but what I would like to know is what they exactly are they doing?
“Are they just tracking accounts or are they trying to influence people’s views? What we do know is that the Brigade has locked its own Twitter account so it cannot be seen so we assume they are trying to influence people under the operatives’ own names. And because we know so little about exactly what they’re doing, we have to look elsewhere for clues for example.
“If we look at the documents leaked by Edward Snowden about the NSA and its JTRIG [Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group] program, we can see that governments are clearly lying and deceiving people by creating troll farms and fake accounts that try to influence the way people think.
“What the governments will say is that they are trying to prevent radicalization and acts of terrorism, but I think it’s deceptive and is a threat to our democracy.
“Twitter is also deceiving us because it is not acting as transparently as it could. If they are working with army personnel in this way, it is extremely damaging to our democracy.
“Given Twitter’s closure of accounts alleged to be used by foreign governments, it’s a very hypocritical stance of Twitter to take.”
Governments propagandising their own people must be OUTLAWED!
Source: NewsWeek.com


humansarefree--2020-12-27--President Trump Set the Record for Most Votes for Any Sitting President In US History

This is the greatest crime in US history .
President Trump set the record for the most votes of a sitting president in US history but the Democrats , most Republicans , Big Tech , Big Media , Big Pharma and China all continue to push for his removal and the Joe Biden steal .
Americans everywhere know who won the 2020 election for President .
President Trump set the record for the most votes in US history .
He accumulated over 74 million votes .
He broke Obama ’ s record of 69 million from 2008 .
He broke @ @ @ @ @ @ @ set the record for the most votes by a Republican in history .
But the elites and Chinese and Democrats want us to believe Joe Biden beat President Trump with a preposterous 81 million votes ?
Most honest people acknowledge that Biden probably didn ’ t reach Hillary ’ s vote total of 65 .
Biden is old , probably senile , and nasty with a horrible record , horrible Anti-American policies , and a dysfunctional family .
Simple Math : Biden Claims 13 MILLION More Votes Than There Were Eligible Voters Who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voting machine switched millions of votes .
We knew this more than a month ago : Analysis Of Election Night Data Allegedly Shows Over 500k Votes Switched From Trump To Biden And Over 2,86 MILLION Votes Simply Deleted .
We also know that in Georgia alone , there are nearly half a million absentee ballots where there are no chain of custody records available which are required by the law .
The one thing that we know for certain is that all the voter and election fraud reported to date benefited Joe Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ method or location , the fraud was to assist senile and corrupt Joe Biden to steal the election .
Every American demands a legitimate election free from fraudulent results .
Our politicians should too .
They should demand a forensic audit of ballots cast and of the voting machines used or they should be calling for another election where fraud is prevented across the board .
Americans will never forget who stands for freedom and who turns and looks the other way .
This is our children and grandchildren ’ s futures we @ @ @ @

This is the greatest crime in US history. President Trump set the record for the most votes of a sitting president in US history but the Democrats, most Republicans, Big Tech, Big Media, Big Pharma and China all continue to push for his removal and the Joe Biden steal.
by Joe Hoft
Americans everywhere know who won the 2020 election for President. President Trump set the record for the most votes in US history. He accumulated over 74 million votes.
He broke Obama’s record of 69 million from 2008. He broke Hillary’s vote total. He set the record for the most votes by a Republican in history.
But the elites and Chinese and Democrats want us to believe Joe Biden beat President Trump with a preposterous 81 million votes?
Most honest people acknowledge that Biden probably didn’t reach Hillary’s vote total of 65. Biden is old, probably senile, and nasty with a horrible record, horrible Anti-American policies, and a dysfunctional family.
Simple Math: Biden Claims 13 MILLION More Votes Than There Were Eligible Voters Who Voted In 2020 Election
Because we know voting machine switched millions of votes. We knew this more than a month ago: Analysis Of Election Night Data Allegedly Shows Over 500k Votes Switched From Trump To Biden And Over 2,86 MILLION Votes Simply Deleted.
We also know that in Georgia alone, there are nearly half a million absentee ballots where there are no chain of custody records available which are required by the law.
The one thing that we know for certain is that all the voter and election fraud reported to date benefited Joe Biden.
This is consistent no matter what method or location, the fraud was to assist senile and corrupt Joe Biden to steal the election.
Every American demands a legitimate election free from fraudulent results. Our politicians should too.
They should demand a forensic audit of ballots cast and of the voting machines used or they should be calling for another election where fraud is prevented across the board.
Americans will never forget who stands for freedom and who turns and looks the other way. This is our children and grandchildren’s futures we are fighting for.


humansarefree--2020-12-27--BioNTech Co-founder: Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Was Designed in Just Few Hours

According to the co-founder of BioNTech Dr Ugur Sahin , the COVID-19 vaccine he designed for Pfizer was designed in just few hours in a single day on January 25 , 2020 .
No other vaccine in history has been created and manufactured so quickly .
Previously , the fastest vaccine ever developed took more than four years .
BioNTech co-founder Dr Ugur Sahin designed the COVID-19 vaccine in just a few hours in mid-January , according to The Journal , a podcast from Gimlet and The Wall Street Journal .
A BioNTech spokesperson confirmed to Business Insider that Sahin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wife , Özlem Türeci – made a “ rough design over one weekend.
” Even , Moderna ’ s coronavirus vaccine also took just two days to design .
The reason both vaccines were designed so quickly was because of the technology they rely on : messenger RNA , or mRNA .
The US Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) had never approved an mRNA-based vaccine or treatment before .
But now the agency has granted authorization to Pfizer ’ s and BioNTech ’ s mRNA based vaccines designed in a day @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is genetic material that tells cells how to make proteins .
These coronavirus vaccines work by injecting a small piece of coronavirus mRNA into the body .
That RNA codes for the virus ’ spike protein , which is what helps it attach to and invade cells .
That ’ s also what antibodies target and neutralize .
The drawbacks of Pfizer and BioNTech ’ s vaccine , however , is also that is has been produced in such a short span of time .
There are also many lingering questions about its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , researchers at the University of Miami have recommended men to have a fertility evaluation and consider to freeze their sperm before receiving the COVID vaccine in order to protect their fertility .
Meanwhile , according to a new CDC report , almost 3,150 people who were administered the COVID-19 vaccine were paralyzed – were “ unable to perform normal daily activities , unable to work and required care from doctor or health care professional.
” A group of researchers in the The Lancet medical journal have also warned that Covid-19 vaccines could @ @ @ @ @ @ @ potentially leading to an increase in infections .
As GreatGameIndia reported , recently Australia scrapped a billion dollar coronavirus vaccine agreement after several trial participants tested HIV positive .
In February a group of Indian scientists discovered that Coronavirus was engineered with AIDS like insertions .
The study concluded that it was unlikely for a virus to have acquired such unique insertions naturally in a short duration of time .
Although the study was retracted after it attracted heavy criticism from experts on social media , Luc Montagnier , the Nobel Prize winning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the study .
The study concluded that it is because of these 4 new AIDS like insertions in Coronavirus that the virus jumped to humans originally known only to infect animals .

by B.N. Frank
There have been numerous reports about COVID jjab recipients experiencing serious side effects and even death.
Perhaps that’s why Kroger is not requiring employees to be vaccinated.
The FAA is also taking precautions by requiring recipients to wait 48 hours before returning to “safety sensitive duties”.
From AOPA:
FAA approves second COVID-19 jjab
December 21, 2020 By Alyssa J. Cobb
The FAA approved the Moderna COVID-19 jjab for pilots and air traffic controllers on December 19, requiring the same 48-hour wait period before “conducting safety-sensitive aviation duties,” as it did for the Pfizer-BioNTech jjab.
The policy was released one day after the Food and Drug Administration granted emergency use authorization for the Moderna jjab.
The Pfizer-BioNTech jjab received FDA authorization on December 11 and was permitted by the FAA on December 12.
“Holders of FAA-issued Airman Medical Certificates or Medical Clearances may receive the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 jjab; however, a 48-hour no fly/no safety related duty interval must be observed after each dose,” the FAA Office of Aerospace Medicine said.
The agency reminded pilots and air traffic controllers that “they are prohibited from performing flight crewmember duties or air traffic control duties if they do not meet medical certification requirements, including those related to adverse events from medications that render them unable to perform such duties.”
As the FDA authorizes additional jjabs, the FAA will evaluate and release policies.
The agency reiterated that it would “monitor the patient response to Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna jjabs and may adjust this policy as necessary to ensure aviation safety.”
Air traffic controllers and pilots played a critical role in the shipment of the first doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech jjab on December 13 when UPS Inc.
Vice President of Flight Operations and Safety Houston Mills (an AOPA member) and first officer Neal Newell flew the cargo from Lansing, Michigan, to Louisville, Kentucky.
“Pilots and air traffic controllers are key players in the fight against the coronavirus pandemic, as evidenced throughout the year by delivering personal protective equipment and more recently by transporting the jjabs,” said AOPA President Mark Baker.
“I am pleased the FAA is acting quickly to evaluate and allow pilots and controllers to take either of the FDA-approved jjabs and return to work and flying after a short period.”
COVID jjabs are still considered to be experimental and experimental jjabs have led to disastrous results in the past.
CBS 60 Minutes’ segment, “The Swine Flu Fraud of ‘76” exposes details about a jjab that injured thousands of Americans who eventually SUED the U.S. government.
Documentary 1986: The Act exposes alarming details about a controversial 30+ year old congressional ruling regarding jjab safety.


humansarefree--2020-12-27--The Kraken is Getting Bigger: Attorney Sidney Powell Releases 270 Page Document on Massive 2020 Elec

The Kraken is Getting Bigger: Attorney Sidney Powell Releases 270 Page Document on Massive 2020 Election Fraud Involving Foreign Interference

Kraken 2.0 : Attorney Sidney Powell released an explosive document on foreign interference to Zenger News this week .
The @ @ @ @ @ affidavits , evidence and testimony from numerous witnesses and sources .
The 270 page document @ @ @ @ @ and all !
The document includes military and alphabet testimony , and details everything from @ @ @ @ @ voting machine fraud , to cybersecurity intrusions into U.S. elections systems and more .
“ @ @ @ @ @ the binder prove direct foreign interference and fraud tainted the Nov. 3 presidential election , @ @ @ @ @ was re-elected .
The entire binder is reproduced here for exclusively.
” Here is the @ @ @ @ @ News .

Sidney Powell went on Newsmax Tuesday night and discussed the efforts of the Trump team to stop the attempted steal of the US Election by the Biden Campaign.
by Joe Hoft
The great attorney of General Michael Flynn and now President Trump.
Sidney Powell, was on with Greg Kelly on Newsmax last night and she discussed the colossal corruption that was used in the 2020 election to steal the election for Joe Biden.
She shared:
“And the will of the people in this country was that Donald Trump win in a landslide. If we can get to the bottom of it, and I am determined to do that, I think we’ll find he had at least 80 million votes.
“The only reason the glitches happened in the system is because he was so, had so far many more votes than they had calculated in advance.
“Their algorithms wouldn’t perform the functions they had originally performed that were set to perform. They couldn’t make up the vote count. He gotten so many hundreds of thousands more than they planned.
“So that’s when they had to stop the counting and come up with a way to back-fill votes or destroy votes for Trump while they fabricated votes for Biden.”
Via Greg Kelly reports:
Sidney Powell confirmed what we have been reporting – that large dumps of hundreds of thousands of votes were recorded early in the morning after the election in Virginia, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Michigan.
After these dumps were recorded, in all of these states nearly every entry of new votes came in at an exact percent in hundreds of entries with Biden leading Trump by the same percent (i.e. 51% to 49%, Biden to Trump).
Again, we found that after Biden was finally (given) the lead, almost every single entry after that was at the same ratio of Biden to Trump votes in Virginia, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Michigan:
The Biden election steal is the boldest and most corrupt action in US history. This even far exceeds the Russia collusion scam.


humansarefree--2020-12-28--CDC: Number of Americans Who Died ‘From’ COVID-19 is Only Around 20k – The Others Died ‘With’ It

How many Americans really died FROM the China coronavirus ?
On Christmas Day the government ’ s television channel , PBS , reported on the the China coronavirus first thing .
This is all they talk about but they never mention China , they label the pandemic COVID-19 : “ The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention made the announcement last night to help prevent the spread of new highly contagious COVID variants in Britain .
That comes as the U.S. death toll surpassed 330,000 .
And hospitalizations nationwide hit a new record high yesterday , more than 120,000.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ We reported in August that the CDC admits that only 6 % of all deaths in the US classified as Coronavirus deaths actually died from the China Coronavirus alone .
Yes , this was from the CDC ’ s own reporting .
So today it looks like less than 20,000 deaths in the US ( 330,000 x 6 % = 19,800 ) over the past year have actually been due to the coronavirus only .
The remainder of the deaths reported by the CDC include accidents , overdoses , suicides and those presumed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ death .
So basically many local and state governments are shutting down their local businesses and institutions due to over-inflated statistics regarding the number of Americans who died from this China oriented coronavirus .
And Let ’ s Not Forget the 97 % False Positives The pandemic is driven by the faulty PCR tests , just like Pfizer ’ s ex-Chief Science Officer , Dr. Michael Yeadon , told us months ago .
“ Almost all ” of the tests for Covid-19 are producing false positives , Dr. Yeadon warns .
Today we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the PCR test produces 97 % false positives .
So out of all of the Covid patients we ’ ve ever seen , 97 % never had Covid .
( Read more ) The study is available here and here .

How many Americans really died FROM the Wuhan coronavirus?
On Christmas Day the government’s television channel, PBS, reported on the the Wuhan coronavirus first thing. This is all they talk about but they never mention China, they label the pandemic COVID-19:
“The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention made the announcement last night to help prevent the spread of new highly contagious COVID variants in Britain. That comes as the U.S. death toll surpassed 330,000. And hospitalizations nationwide hit a new record high yesterday, more than 120,000.”
But this reporting is questionable. We reported in August that the CDC admits that only 6% of all deaths in the US classified as Coronavirus deaths actually died from the Wuhan Coronavirus alone.
Yes, this was from the CDC’s own reporting. So today it looks like less than 20,000 deaths in the US (330,000 x 6% = 19,800) over the past year have actually been due to the coronavirus only.
The remainder of the deaths reported by the CDC include accidents, overdoses, suicides and those presumed to have had the coronavirus upon their death.
So basically many local and state governments are shutting down their local businesses and institutions due to over-inflated statistics regarding the number of Americans who died from this Wuhan oriented coronavirus.
By Joe Hoft, Guest writer
And Let’s Not Forget the 97% False Positives
The pandemic is driven by the faulty PCR tests, just like Pfizer’s ex-Chief Science Officer, Dr. Michael Yeadon, told us months ago.
“Almost all” of the tests for Covid-19 are producing false positives, Dr. Yeadon warns.
Today we learn that 22 highly renowned scientists conclude that the PCR test produces 97% false positives. So out of all of the Covid patients we’ve ever seen, 97% never had Covid. (Read more)
The study is available here and here.


humansarefree--2020-12-27--The ‘SPARS PANDEMIC 2025-2028’ Simulation Details a New Coronavirus PLANdemic That Will Follow COVID

The ‘SPARS PANDEMIC 2025-2028’ Simulation Details a New Coronavirus PLANdemic That Will Follow COVID-19


humansarefree--2020-12-29--12 Times the Lockdowners Were Wrong

12 Times the Lockdowners Were Wrong

This has been a year of astonishing policy failure .
We are surrounded by devastation conceived and cheered by intellectuals and their political handmaidens .
The errors number in the thousands , so please consider the following little more than a first draft , a mere guide to what will surely be unearthed in the coming months and years .
We trusted these people with our lives and liberties and here is what they did with that trust .
• Anthony Fauci says lockdowns are not possible in the United States ( January 24 ) : When asked about the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , China back in January , Fauci dismissed the prospect of lockdowns ever coming to the United States : “ That ’ s something that I don ’ t think we could possibly do in the United States , I can ’ t imagine shutting down New York or Los Angeles , but the judgement on the part of the Chinese health authorities is that given the fact that it ’ s spreading throughout the provinces… it ’ s their judgement that this is something that in fact is going to help in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ does or does not is really open to question because historically when you shut things down it doesn ’ t have a major effect.
” Less than two months later , 43 of 50 US states were under lockdown – a policy advocated by Fauci himself .
• US government and WHO officials advise against mask use ( February and March ) When mask sales spiked due to widespread individual adoption in the early weeks of the pandemic , numerous US government and WHO officials took to the airwaves to describe masks as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ General Jerome Adams tweeted against masks on February 29 .
Anthony Faucipublicly discouraged mask use in a nationally broadcast 60 Minutes interview on March 7 .
At a March 30 World Health Organization briefing its Director-General supported mask use in medical settings but dissuaded the same in the general public .
By mid-summer , all had reversed course and encouraged mask-wearing in the general public as an essential tool for halting the pandemic .
Fauci essentially conceded that he lied to the public in order to prevent a shortage on masks , whereas @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the scientific claims around masking .
While mainstream epidemiology literature stressed the ambiguous nature of evidence surrounding masks as recently as 2019 , these scientists were suddenly certain that masks were something of a magic bullet for Covid .
It turns out that both positions are likely wrong .
Masks appear to have marginal effects at diminishing spread , especially in highly infectious settings and around the vulnerable .
But their effectiveness at combating Covid has also been grossly exaggerated , as illustrated by the fact thatmask adoption reached near-universal levels in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ effect on the course of the pandemic .
Fauci testified before Congress in early March where he was asked to estimate the severity of the disease in comparison to influenza .
His testimony that Covid was “ 10 times more lethal than the seasonal flu ” stoked widespread alarm and provided a major impetus for the decision to go into lockdown .
The problem , as Ronald Brown documented in an epidemiology journal article , is that Fauci based his estimates on a conflation of the Infection Fatality Rate ( IFR ) and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ influenza , leading him to exaggerate the comparative danger of Covid by an order of magnitude .
Fauci ’ s error – which he further compounded in a late February article for the New England Journal of Medicine – helped to convince Congress of the need for drastic lockdown measures , while also spreading panic in the media and general public .
As of this writing Fauci has not acknowledged the magnitude of his error , nor has the journal corrected his article .
The lockdowners settled on a catchy slogan in mid-March @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and social life around the globe : two weeks to flatten the curve .
The White House Covid task force aggressively promoted this line , as did the news media and much of the epidemiology profession .
The logic behind the slogan came from the ubiquitous graph showing ( 1 ) a steep caseload that would overwhelm our hospital system , or ( 2 ) a mitigated alternative that would spread the caseload out over several weeks , making it manageable .
To get to graph # 2 , society would need to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ orders until the capacity issue could be managed .
Indeed , we were told that if we did not accept this solution the hospital system would enter into catastrophic failure in only 10 days , as former DHS pandemic adviser Tom Bossert claimed in a widely-circulated interview and Washington Post column on March 11 .
Two weeks came and went , then the rationale on which they were sold to the public shifted .
Hospitals were no longer on the verge of being overwhelmed – indeed most hospitals nationwide remained well under capacity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exceptions in the worst-hit neighborhoods of New York City .
A US Navy hospital ship sent to relieve New York departed a month later after serving only 182 patients , and a pop-up hospital in the city ’ s Javits Convention Center sat mostly empty .
But the lockdowns remained in place , as did the emergency orders justifying them .
Two weeks became a month , which became two months , which became almost a year .
We were no longer “ flattening the curve ” – a strategy premised on saving @ @ @ @ @ @ @ never manifested – but instead refocused on using lockdowns as a general suppression strategy against the disease itself .
In short , the epidemiology profession sold us a bill of goods .
The name Neil Ferguson , the lead modeler and chief spokesman for Imperial College London ’ s pandemic response team , has become synonymous with lockdown alarmism for good reason .
Ferguson has a long track record of making grossly exaggerated predictions of catastrophic death tolls for almost every single disease that comes along , and urging aggressive policy responses to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no different , and Ferguson assumed center stage when he released a highly influential model of the virus ’ s death forecasts for the US and UK .
Ferguson appeared with UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson on March 16 to announce the shift toward lockdowns ( with no small irony , he was coming down with Covid himself at the time and may have been the patient zero of a super-spreader event that ran through Downing Street and infected Johnson himself ) .
Across the Atlantic , Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx cited @ @ @ @ @ @ @ justification for locking down the US .
There was a problem though : Ferguson had a bad habit of dramatically hyping his own predictions to political leaders and the press .
The Imperial College paper modeled a broad range of scenarios including death tolls that ranged from tens of thousands to over 2 million , but Ferguson ’ s public statements only stressed the latter – even though the paper itself conceded that such an extreme “ worst case ” scenario was highly unrealistic .
A telling example came on March 20thwhen the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ contacted the Imperial College modeler to ask about the most likely scenario for the United States .
As Kristof related to his readers , “ I asked Ferguson for his best case .
“ About 1.1 million deaths , ” he said.
” • Researchers in Sweden use the Imperial College model to predict 95,000 deaths ( April 10 ) After Neil Ferguson ’ s shocking death toll predictions for the US and UK captivated policymaker attention and drove both governments into lockdown , researchers in other countries began adapting the Imperial College @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , these models sought to reaffirm the decisions of each country to lock down .
The government of Sweden , however , had decided to buck the trend , setting the stage for a natural experiment to test the Imperial model ’ s performance .
In early April a team of researchers at Uppsala University adapted the Imperial model to Sweden ’ s population and demographics and ran its projections .
If Sweden stayed the course and did not lock down , it could expect a catastrophic 96,000 deaths by early summer .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ into immediate lockdown , but since Sweden lagged behind Europe in adopting such measures they also predicted that this “ best case ” option would reduce deaths to “ only ” 30,000 .
By early June when the 96,000 prediction was supposed to come true , Sweden had recorded 4,600 deaths .
Six months later , Sweden has about 8,000 deaths – a severe pandemic to be sure , but an order of magnitude smaller than what the modelers predicted .
Facing embarrassment from these results , Ferguson and Imperial Collegeattempted to distance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ model in early May .
Yet the Uppsala team ’ s projections closely matched Imperial ’ s own UK and US predictions when scaled to reflect their population sizes .
In short , the Imperial model catastrophically failed one of the few clear natural experiment tests of its predictive ability .
In the second week of the lockdowns several newspapers in California promoted a bizarre theory : Covid could spread by ocean spray ( although the paper later walked back the headline-grabbing claim , it is outlined here in the Los Angeles Times @ @ @ @ @ @ @ initially promoted by a group of biologists who study bacterial infection connected to storm runoff – the Covid virus washed down storm gutters and into the ocean , where the ocean breeze would kick it up into the air and infect people on the nearby beaches .
As silly as this theory now sounds , it helped to inform California ’ s initially draconian enforcement of lockdowns on its public beaches .
The same week that this modern-day miasmic drift theory appeared , police in Malibueven arrested a lone paddleboarder for going into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ while citing the possibility that the ocean breeze carried Covid with it .
• Neil Ferguson predicts catastrophic death tolls in US states that reopen ( May 24 ) Fresh off of their exaggerated predictions from March , the Imperial College team led by Neil Ferguson doubled down on alarmist modeling .
As several US states started to reopen in late April and May , Ferguson and his colleagues published a new model predicting another catastrophic wave of deaths by the mid-summer .
Their model focused on 5 states with both moderate and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ If they reopened , according to the Imperial team ’ s model , New York could face up to 3,000 deaths per day by July .
Florida could hit as high as 4,000 , and California could hit 5,000 daily deaths .
Keeping in mind that these projections were for each state alone , they exceed the daily death toll peaks for the entire country in both the fall and spring .
Showing just how bad the Imperial model was , the actual death toll by mid-July in several of the examined states @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of its projected count .
While Covid remains a threat in all 5 states , the post-reopening explosion of deaths predicted by Imperial College and used to argue for keeping the lockdowns in place never happened .
• Anthony Fauci credits lockdowns for beating the virus in Europe ( July 31 ) In late July Anthony Fauci offered additional testimony to Congress .
His message credited Europe ’ s heavy lockdowns with defeating the virus , whereas he blamed the United States for reopening too early and for insufficient aggressiveness in the initial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time , “ If you look at what happened in Europe , when they shut down or locked down or went to shelter in place — however you want to describe it — they really did it to the tune of about 95 % plus of the country did that.
” The message was clear : the United States should have followed Europe , but failed to do so and got a summer wave of Covid instead .
Fauci ’ s entire argument however wasbased on a string of falsehoods and errors .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ that most Americans were staying home during the spring outbreak , with a recorded decline that matched Germany , the Netherlands , and several other European countries .
Contrary to Fauci ’ s claim , the US was actually slower than most of Europe to reopen .
Furthermore , his praise of Europe collapsed in the early fall when almost all of the lockdown countries in Europe experienced severe second waves – just like the locked down regions of the United States .
• New Zealand and Australia declare themselves Covid-free ( August-present @ @ @ @ @ @ @ far weathered the pandemic with extremely low case counts , leading many epidemiologists and journalists to conflate these results with evidence of their successful and replicable mitigation policies .
In reality , New Zealand and Australia opted for the medieval ‘ Prince Prospero ’ strategy of attempting to wall themselves from the world until the pandemic passes – an approach that is highly dependent on their unique geographies .
As island nations with comparatively lower international travel than North America and Europe , both countries shut down their borders before the as-of-yet undetected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ever since .
It ’ s a costly strategy in terms of its economic impact and personal displacement , but it kept the virus out – mostly .
The problem with New Zealand and Australia ’ s Prince Prospero strategy is that it ’ s inherently fragile .
All it takes to throw it into chaos is for the virus to slip past the border – including by accident or human error .
Then heavy-handed lockdowns ensue , imposed with maximum disruption at the spur of the moment in a frantic attempt to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ example happened on August 9 when New Zealand ’ s Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern declared that New Zealand had reached 100 days of being Covid-free .
Then just two days later a breach happened , sending Auckland into heavy lockdown .
It ’ s a pattern that has repeated itself every few weeks in both countries .
In early December , we saw a similar flurry of stories from Australia announcing that the country had beaten Covid .
Two weeks later , another breach occurred in the suburbs around Sydney , prompting a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ missteps as well .
In November the entire state of South Australia went into heavy lockdown over a single misreported case of Covid that was mistakenly attributed to a pizza purchase that did not exist .
While both countries continue to celebrate their low fatality rates , they ’ ve also incurred some of the harshest and most disruptive restrictions in the world – all the result of premature declarations of being “ Covid-free ” followed by an unexpected breach and another frantic lockdown .
In early October a group of scientists met @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Great Barrington Declaration , a statement calling attention to the severe social and economic harms of lockdowns and urging the world to adopt alternative strategies for ensuring the protection of the most vulnerable .
Although the statement quickly gathered tens of thousands of co-signers from health science and medical professionals , it also left the lockdown supporters incensed .
They responded not by scientific debate over the merits of their policies , but with a vilification campaign .
They answered by flooding the petition with hoax signatures and juvenile name-calling , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ AIER ’ s funding ( the primary instigator of both tactics , ironically , was a UK blogger known for promoting 9/11 Truther conspiracies ) .
But the lockdowners also adopted another narrative : they began to deny that lockdowns were even on the table .
Nobody was considering bringing back the lockdowns from the spring , they insisted .
Arguing against the politically unpopular shelter-in-place orders in the fall only served the purpose of undermining public support for narrower and more temperate restrictions .
The Great Barrington authors , we were told @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” from the past .
Over the next several weeks in October a dozen or more prominent epidemiologists , public health experts , and journalists peddled the “ lockdowns are a strawman ” line .
The “ strawman ” claim saw promotion in top outlets including the New York Times , and in an op-ed by two principle co-signers of the John Snow Memorandum , a competing petition that lockdown supporters drafted as a response to the Great Barrington Declaration .
The message was clear : the GBD was sounding a false alarm @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lockdowners “ reluctantly ” supported in the spring as an emergency measure but had no intention of reviving .
By early November , the “ strawman ” of renewed lockdowns became a reality in dozens of countries across the globe – often cheered on by the very same people who used the “ strawman ” canard in October .
Several US states followed suit including California , which imposed severe restrictions on private gatherings up to and including meeting your own family for Thanksgiving and Christmas .
And a few weeks after that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who used the “ strawman ” line in October revised their own positions after the fact .
They started claiming they had supported a second lockdown all along , and began blaming the GBD for impeding their efforts to impose them at an earlier date .
In short , the entire “ lockdowns are a strawman ” narrative was false .
And it now appears that more than a few of the scientists who used it were actively lying about their own intentions in October .
• Anthony Fauci touts New York as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) By all indicators , New York state has suffered one of the worst coronavirus outbreaks in the world .
Its year-end mortality rate of almost 1,900 deaths per million residents exceeds every single country in the world .
The state famously bungled its nursing home response when Governor Andrew Cuomo forced these facilities to readmit Covid-positive patients as a way to relieve strains on hospitals .
The policy backfired as most hospitals never reached capacity , but the readmissions introduced the virus into vulnerable nursing home populations resulting in widespread fatalities ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nursing home fatalities by excluding residents who are moved to a hospital from its reported numbers , further obscuring the true toll of Cuomo ’ s order ) .
New York has also fared poorly during the fall “ second wave ” despite reimposing harsh restrictions and regional lockdown measures .
By mid-December , its death rate shot far above the mostly-open state of Florida , which has the closest comparable population size to New York .
All things considered , New York ’ s weathering of the pandemic is an exemplar of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s policies not only failed to contain the virus – they likely made it far more deadly to vulnerable populations .
Enter Anthony Fauci , who has been asked multiple times in the press what a model Covid response policy would look like .
He gave his first answer on July 20th : “ We know that , when you do it properly , you bring down those cases .
We have done it .
We have done it in New York.
” Fauci was operating under the assumption that New York , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , had successfully brought the pandemic under control through its aggressive lockdowns and slow reopening .
One might think that the fall rebound in New York , despite locking down again , would call this conclusion into question .
Not so much for Dr. Fauci , who told the Wall Street Journal on December 8 : “ New York got hit really badly in the beginning ” but they did “ a really good job of keeping things down , and still , their level is low compared to the rest of the @ @ @

This has been a year of astonishing policy failure. We are surrounded by devastation conceived and cheered by intellectuals and their political handmaidens. The errors number in the thousands, so please consider the following little more than a first draft, a mere guide to what will surely be unearthed in the coming months and years.
We trusted these people with our lives and liberties and here is what they did with that trust.
Anthony Fauci says lockdowns are not possible in the United States (January 24):
When asked about the mass quarantine containment efforts underway in Wuhan, China back in January, Fauci dismissed the prospect of lockdowns ever coming to the United States:
“That’s something that I don’t think we could possibly do in the United States, I can’t imagine shutting down New York or Los Angeles, but the judgement on the part of the Chinese health authorities is that given the fact that it’s spreading throughout the provinces… it’s their judgement that this is something that in fact is going to help in containing it. Whether or not it does or does not is really open to question because historically when you shut things down it doesn’t have a major effect.”
Less than two months later, 43 of 50 US states were under lockdown – a policy advocated by Fauci himself.
US government and WHO officials advise against mask use (February and March)
When mask sales spiked due to widespread individual adoption in the early weeks of the pandemic, numerous US government and WHO officials took to the airwaves to describe masks as ineffective and discourage their use.
Surgeon General Jerome Adams tweeted against masks on February 29. Anthony Faucipublicly discouraged mask use in a nationally broadcast 60 Minutes interview on March 7. At a March 30 World Health Organization briefing its Director-General supported mask use in medical settings but dissuaded the same in the general public.
By mid-summer, all had reversed course and encouraged mask-wearing in the general public as an essential tool for halting the pandemic. Fauci essentially conceded that he lied to the public in order to prevent a shortage on masks, whereas other health officials did an about-face on the scientific claims around masking.
While mainstream epidemiology literature stressed the ambiguous nature of evidence surrounding masks as recently as 2019, these scientists were suddenly certain that masks were something of a magic bullet for Covid. It turns out that both positions are likely wrong.
Masks appear to have marginal effects at diminishing spread, especially in highly infectious settings and around the vulnerable. But their effectiveness at combating Covid has also been grossly exaggerated, as illustrated by the fact thatmask adoption reached near-universal levels in the US by the summer with little discernible effect on the course of the pandemic.
Anthony Fauci’s decimal error in estimating Covid’s fatality rates (March 11)
Fauci testified before Congress in early March where he was asked to estimate the severity of the disease in comparison to influenza. His testimony that Covid was “10 times more lethal than the seasonal flu” stoked widespread alarm and provided a major impetus for the decision to go into lockdown.
The problem, as Ronald Brown documented in an epidemiology journal article, is that Fauci based his estimates on a conflation of the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) and Case Fatality Rate (CFR) for influenza, leading him to exaggerate the comparative danger of Covid by an order of magnitude.
Fauci’s error – which he further compounded in a late February article for the New England Journal of Medicine – helped to convince Congress of the need for drastic lockdown measures, while also spreading panic in the media and general public. As of this writing Fauci has not acknowledged the magnitude of his error, nor has the journal corrected his article.
“Two weeks to flatten the curve” (March 16)
The lockdowners settled on a catchy slogan in mid-March to justify their unprecedented shuttering of economic and social life around the globe: two weeks to flatten the curve. The White House Covid task force aggressively promoted this line, as did the news media and much of the epidemiology profession.
The logic behind the slogan came from the ubiquitous graph showing (1) a steep caseload that would overwhelm our hospital system, or (2) a mitigated alternative that would spread the caseload out over several weeks, making it manageable.
To get to graph #2, society would need to buckle up for two weeks of shelter-in-place orders until the capacity issue could be managed. Indeed, we were told that if we did not accept this solution the hospital system would enter into catastrophic failure in only 10 days, as former DHS pandemic adviser Tom Bossert claimed in a widely-circulated interview and Washington Post column on March 11.
Two weeks came and went, then the rationale on which they were sold to the public shifted. Hospitals were no longer on the verge of being overwhelmed – indeed most hospitals nationwide remained well under capacity, with only a tiny number of exceptions in the worst-hit neighborhoods of New York City.
A US Navy hospital ship sent to relieve New York departed a month later after serving only 182 patients, and a pop-up hospital in the city’s Javits Convention Center sat mostly empty. But the lockdowns remained in place, as did the emergency orders justifying them.
Two weeks became a month, which became two months, which became almost a year. We were no longer “flattening the curve” – a strategy premised on saving the hospital system from a threat than never manifested – but instead refocused on using lockdowns as a general suppression strategy against the disease itself. In short, the epidemiology profession sold us a bill of goods.
Neil Ferguson predicts a “best case” US scenario of 1.1 million deaths (March 20)
The name Neil Ferguson, the lead modeler and chief spokesman for Imperial College London’s pandemic response team, has become synonymous with lockdown alarmism for good reason. Ferguson has a long track record of making grossly exaggerated predictions of catastrophic death tolls for almost every single disease that comes along, and urging aggressive policy responses to the same including lockdowns.
Covid was no different, and Ferguson assumed center stage when he released a highly influential model of the virus’s death forecasts for the US and UK. Ferguson appeared with UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson on March 16 to announce the shift toward lockdowns (with no small irony, he was coming down with Covid himself at the time and may have been the patient zero of a super-spreader event that ran through Downing Street and infected Johnson himself).
Across the Atlantic, Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx cited Ferguson’s model as a direct justification for locking down the US. There was a problem though: Ferguson had a bad habit of dramatically hyping his own predictions to political leaders and the press.
The Imperial College paper modeled a broad range of scenarios including death tolls that ranged from tens of thousands to over 2 million, but Ferguson’s public statements only stressed the latter – even though the paper itself conceded that such an extreme “worst case” scenario was highly unrealistic.
A telling example came on March 20thwhen the New York Times’s Nicholas Kristof contacted the Imperial College modeler to ask about the most likely scenario for the United States. As Kristof related to his readers, “I asked Ferguson for his best case. “About 1.1 million deaths,” he said.”
Researchers in Sweden use the Imperial College model to predict 95,000 deaths (April 10)
After Neil Ferguson’s shocking death toll predictions for the US and UK captivated policymaker attention and drove both governments into lockdown, researchers in other countries began adapting the Imperial College model to their own circumstances.
Usually, these models sought to reaffirm the decisions of each country to lock down. The government of Sweden, however, had decided to buck the trend, setting the stage for a natural experiment to test the Imperial model’s performance.
In early April a team of researchers at Uppsala University adapted the Imperial model to Sweden’s population and demographics and ran its projections.
Their result?
If Sweden stayed the course and did not lock down, it could expect a catastrophic 96,000 deaths by early summer. The authors of the study recommended going into immediate lockdown, but since Sweden lagged behind Europe in adopting such measures they also predicted that this “best case” option would reduce deaths to “only” 30,000.
By early June when the 96,000 prediction was supposed to come true, Sweden had recorded 4,600 deaths. Six months later, Sweden has about 8,000 deaths – a severe pandemic to be sure, but an order of magnitude smaller than what the modelers predicted.
Facing embarrassment from these results, Ferguson and Imperial Collegeattempted to distance themselves from the Swedish adaptation of their model in early May. Yet the Uppsala team’s projections closely matched Imperial’s own UK and US predictions when scaled to reflect their population sizes. In short, the Imperial model catastrophically failed one of the few clear natural experiment tests of its predictive ability.
Scientists suggest that ocean spray spreads Covid (April 2)
In the second week of the lockdowns several newspapers in California promoted a bizarre theory: Covid could spread by ocean spray (although the paper later walked back the headline-grabbing claim, it is outlined here in the Los Angeles Times).
According to this theory – initially promoted by a group of biologists who study bacterial infection connected to storm runoff – the Covid virus washed down storm gutters and into the ocean, where the ocean breeze would kick it up into the air and infect people on the nearby beaches.
As silly as this theory now sounds, it helped to inform California’s initially draconian enforcement of lockdowns on its public beaches.
The same week that this modern-day miasmic drift theory appeared, police in Malibueven arrested a lone paddleboarder for going into the ocean during the lockdown – all while citing the possibility that the ocean breeze carried Covid with it.
Neil Ferguson predicts catastrophic death tolls in US states that reopen (May 24)
Fresh off of their exaggerated predictions from March, the Imperial College team led by Neil Ferguson doubled down on alarmist modeling. As several US states started to reopen in late April and May, Ferguson and his colleagues published a new model predicting another catastrophic wave of deaths by the mid-summer.
Their model focused on 5 states with both moderate and severe outbreaks during the first wave. If they reopened, according to the Imperial team’s model, New York could face up to 3,000 deaths per day by July.
Florida could hit as high as 4,000, and California could hit 5,000 daily deaths. Keeping in mind that these projections were for each state alone, they exceed the daily death toll peaks for the entire country in both the fall and spring.
Showing just how bad the Imperial model was, the actual death toll by mid-July in several of the examined states even fell below the lower confidence boundary of its projected count. While Covid remains a threat in all 5 states, the post-reopening explosion of deaths predicted by Imperial College and used to argue for keeping the lockdowns in place never happened.
Anthony Fauci credits lockdowns for beating the virus in Europe (July 31)
In late July Anthony Fauci offered additional testimony to Congress. His message credited Europe’s heavy lockdowns with defeating the virus, whereas he blamed the United States for reopening too early and for insufficient aggressiveness in the initial lockdowns.
As Fauci stated at the time, “If you look at what happened in Europe, when they shut down or locked down or went to shelter in place — however you want to describe it — they really did it to the tune of about 95% plus of the country did that.”
The message was clear: the United States should have followed Europe, but failed to do so and got a summer wave of Covid instead. Fauci’s entire argument however wasbased on a string of falsehoods and errors.
Mobility data from the US clearly showed that most Americans were staying home during the spring outbreak, with a recorded decline that matched Germany, the Netherlands, and several other European countries. Contrary to Fauci’s claim, the US was actually slower than most of Europe to reopen.
Furthermore, his praise of Europe collapsed in the early fall when almost all of the lockdown countries in Europe experienced severe second waves – just like the locked down regions of the United States.
New Zealand and Australia declare themselves Covid-free (August-present)
New Zealand and Australia have thus far weathered the pandemic with extremely low case counts, leading many epidemiologists and journalists to conflate these results with evidence of their successful and replicable mitigation policies.
In reality, New Zealand and Australia opted for the medieval ‘Prince Prospero’ strategy of attempting to wall themselves from the world until the pandemic passes – an approach that is highly dependent on their unique geographies.
As island nations with comparatively lower international travel than North America and Europe, both countries shut down their borders before the as-of-yet undetected virus became widespread and have remained closed ever since. It’s a costly strategy in terms of its economic impact and personal displacement, but it kept the virus out – mostly.
The problem with New Zealand and Australia’s Prince Prospero strategy is that it’s inherently fragile. All it takes to throw it into chaos is for the virus to slip past the border – including by accident or human error. Then heavy-handed lockdowns ensue, imposed with maximum disruption at the spur of the moment in a frantic attempt to contain the breach.
The most famous example happened on August 9 when New Zealand’s Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern declared that New Zealand had reached 100 days of being Covid-free. Then just two days later a breach happened, sending Auckland into heavy lockdown. It’s a pattern that has repeated itself every few weeks in both countries.
In early December, we saw a similar flurry of stories from Australia announcing that the country had beaten Covid. Two weeks later, another breach occurred in the suburbs around Sydney, prompting a regional lockdown. There have been embarrassing missteps as well.
In November the entire state of South Australia went into heavy lockdown over a single misreported case of Covid that was mistakenly attributed to a pizza purchase that did not exist. While both countries continue to celebrate their low fatality rates, they’ve also incurred some of the harshest and most disruptive restrictions in the world – all the result of premature declarations of being “Covid-free” followed by an unexpected breach and another frantic lockdown.
“Renewed lockdowns are just a strawman” (October)
In early October a group of scientists met at AIER where they drafted and signed the Great Barrington Declaration, a statement calling attention to the severe social and economic harms of lockdowns and urging the world to adopt alternative strategies for ensuring the protection of the most vulnerable.
Although the statement quickly gathered tens of thousands of co-signers from health science and medical professionals, it also left the lockdown supporters incensed. They responded not by scientific debate over the merits of their policies, but with a vilification campaign.
They answered by flooding the petition with hoax signatures and juvenile name-calling, and by peddling wildly false conspiracy theories about AIER’s funding (the primary instigator of both tactics, ironically, was a UK blogger known for promoting 9/11 Truther conspiracies). But the lockdowners also adopted another narrative: they began to deny that lockdowns were even on the table.
Nobody was considering bringing back the lockdowns from the spring, they insisted. Arguing against the politically unpopular shelter-in-place orders in the fall only served the purpose of undermining public support for narrower and more temperate restrictions. The Great Barrington authors, we were told, were arguing with a “strawman” from the past.
Over the next several weeks in October a dozen or more prominent epidemiologists, public health experts, and journalists peddled the “lockdowns are a strawman” line. The “strawman” claim saw promotion in top outlets including the New York Times, and in an op-ed by two principle co-signers of the John Snow Memorandum, a competing petition that lockdown supporters drafted as a response to the Great Barrington Declaration.
The message was clear: the GBD was sounding a false alarm against policies from the past that the lockdowners “reluctantly” supported in the spring as an emergency measure but had no intention of reviving. By early November, the “strawman” of renewed lockdowns became a reality in dozens of countries across the globe – often cheered on by the very same people who used the “strawman” canard in October.
Several US states followed suit including California, which imposed severe restrictions on private gatherings up to and including meeting your own family for Thanksgiving and Christmas. And a few weeks after that, some of the very same epidemiologists who used the “strawman” line in October revised their own positions after the fact.
They started claiming they had supported a second lockdown all along, and began blaming the GBD for impeding their efforts to impose them at an earlier date. In short, the entire “lockdowns are a strawman” narrative was false. And it now appears that more than a few of the scientists who used it were actively lying about their own intentions in October.
Anthony Fauci touts New York as a model for Covid containment (June-December)
By all indicators, New York state has suffered one of the worst coronavirus outbreaks in the world. Its year-end mortality rate of almost 1,900 deaths per million residents exceeds every single country in the world. The state famously bungled its nursing home response when Governor Andrew Cuomo forced these facilities to readmit Covid-positive patients as a way to relieve strains on hospitals.
The policy backfired as most hospitals never reached capacity, but the readmissions introduced the virus into vulnerable nursing home populations resulting in widespread fatalities (to this day New York intentionally undercounts nursing home fatalities by excluding residents who are moved to a hospital from its reported numbers, further obscuring the true toll of Cuomo’s order).
New York has also fared poorly during the fall “second wave” despite reimposing harsh restrictions and regional lockdown measures. By mid-December, its death rate shot far above the mostly-open state of Florida, which has the closest comparable population size to New York. All things considered, New York’s weathering of the pandemic is an exemplar of what not to do.
Cuomo’s policies not only failed to contain the virus – they likely made it far more deadly to vulnerable populations. Enter Anthony Fauci, who has been asked multiple times in the press what a model Covid response policy would look like. He gave his first answer on July 20th:
“We know that, when you do it properly, you bring down those cases. We have done it. We have done it in New York.”
Fauci was operating under the assumption that New York, despite its bad run in the spring, had successfully brought the pandemic under control through its aggressive lockdowns and slow reopening. One might think that the fall rebound in New York, despite locking down again, would call this conclusion into question.
Not so much for Dr. Fauci, who told the Wall Street Journal on December 8: “New York got hit really badly in the beginning” but they did “a really good job of keeping things down, and still, their level is low compared to the rest of the country.”
By Phillip W. Magness, Guest writer


humansarefree--2020-12-28--Another Vatican Insider: COVID-19 is Being Used by ‘Certain Forces’ to Advance Their ‘Evil Agenda’

Former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America , Carlo Maria Viganò , has recently been joined by another Vatican ‘ insider.
’ His name is Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke .
Burke is the founder of The Shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe , former head of the Vatican Supreme Court and patron of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta .
According to Burke as he said during a Saturday homily : “ Then there is the mysterious Wuhan virus about whose nature and prevention the mass media daily give us conflicting information .
What is clear , however @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by certain forces , inimical to families and to the freedom of nations , to advance their evil agenda .
“ These forces tell us that we are now the subjects of the so-called ‘ Great Reset , ’ the ‘ new normal , ’ which is dictated to us by their manipulation of citizens and nations through ignorance and fear.
” He is referring to the manipulation of human consciousness , something we here at CE talk about quite a bit .
Burke has come under sharp criticism for his views many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up against “ The Great Reset ” or paints a picture of COVID that doesn ’ t match the narrative we constantly receive from mainstream media , their words usually remain unacknowledged and , if they get big enough and achieve some sort of virality , they ’ re usually labelled as a conspiracy theory or “ fake news .
”

Former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America, Carlo Maria Viganò, has recently been joined by another Vatican ‘insider.’ His name is Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke.
Burke is the founder of The Shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe, former head of the Vatican Supreme Court and patron of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta.
According to Burke as he said during a Saturday homily:
“Then there is the mysterious Wuhan virus about whose nature and prevention the mass media daily give us conflicting information. What is clear, however, is that it has been used by certain forces, inimical to families and to the freedom of nations, to advance their evil agenda.
“These forces tell us that we are now the subjects of the so-called ‘Great Reset,’ the ‘new normal,’ which is dictated to us by their manipulation of citizens and nations through ignorance and fear.”
He is referring to the manipulation of human consciousness, something we here at CE talk about quite a bit.
Burke has come under sharp criticism for his views many times, and if someone popular speaks up against “The Great Reset” or paints a picture of COVID that doesn’t match the narrative we constantly receive from mainstream media, their words usually remain unacknowledged and, if they get big enough and achieve some sort of virality, they’re usually labelled as a conspiracy theory or “fake news.”
Source: Collective-Evolution.com (excerpt)


humansarefree--2020-12-28--New Polls Show: Most Europeans, Including Hospital Staff, Refuse To Take COVID-19 Vaccine

All is not going according to plan in the biggest global rollout of what is arguably the most important vaccine in a century , and it is not just growing US mistrust in the covid injection effort that was rolled out in record time : an unexpected spike in allergic reactions to the Pfizer / BioNTech vaccine ( and now , Moderna too ) may prove catastrophic to widespread acceptance unless scientists can figure out what is causing it after the FDA ’ s rushed approval , and is also why as we reported yesterday , scientists are scrambling to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reactions .
Europe rolled out a huge COVID-19 vaccination drive on Sunday to try to rein in the coronavirus pandemic but even more Europeans than American are sceptical about the speed at which the vaccines have been tested and approved and reluctant to have the shot .
While the European Union has secured contracts drugmakers including Pfizer , Moderna and AstraZeneca , for a total of more than two billion doses and has set a goal for all adults to be inoculated next year , this is looking increasingly like a pipe dream @ @ @ @ @ @ @ local population has expressed “ high levels of hesitancy ” towards inoculation in countries from France to Poland , with many used to vaccines taking decades to develop , not just months .
“ I don ’ t think there ’ s a vaccine in history that has been tested so quickly , ” Ireneusz Sikorski , 41 , said as he stepped out of a church in central Warsaw with his two children .
“ I am not saying vaccination shouldn ’ t be taking place .
But I am not going @ @ @ @ @ @ @ children , or on myself.
” Smart : why take the risk of getting vaccinated when others will do it , resulting in the same outcome .
Surveys in Poland , where distrust in public institutions runs deep , show that fewer than 40 % of people planning to get vaccinated .
According to Reuters on Sunday , only half the medical staff in a Warsaw hospital where the country ’ s first shot was administered had signed up .
And if the doctors don ’ t trust the vaccine , one can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ refuse to take it .
The situation is similar in Spain , one of Europe ’ s hardest-hit countries , where 28-year-old singer and music composer German summarizes the skepticism of a broad range of the population , and plans to wait for now .
“ No one close to me has had it ( COVID-19 ) .
I ’ m obviously not saying it doesn ’ t exist because lots of people have died of it , but for now I wouldn ’ t have it ( the vaccine ) .
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ where 45 % of people have said they would not get a shot and 40 % plan to wait to see if any negative side effects appear – meaning only 15 % of the population will actually volunteer for a vaccine in the near future – is in the tiny minority when it comes to taking the vaccine .
“ Myself , I am vaccinated against everything I can be , ” Bishop Tihon told reporters after getting his shot , standing alongside the health minister in Sofia .
He spoke about anxiety @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the 1950s and 1960s .
To be sure , the establishment is pounding the table on why the vaccines are safe despite the record short time in development ( even though not even the “ scientists ” can explain what is behind the spike in vaccine allergic reactions ) , and claiming that the new technology behind the mRNA vaccine is all one needs to know… when it is precisely this new technology that is sparking the skepticism .
“ We ’ ll look back on the advances made in 2020 and say @ @ @ @ @ @ @ science really did make a leap forward ’ , ” said Jeremy Farrar , director of the Oxford University Clinical Research Unit , which is backed by the Wellcome Trust .
Oxford also received $ 750MM from Bill Gates in June in the billionaire ’ s quest to vaccinate the world against Covid .
Only problem : nobody in Europe seems to care about these “ scientific ” justifications .
Independent pollster Alpha Research said its recent survey suggested that fewer than one in five Bulgarians from the first groups to be offered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , teachers and nursing home staff – planned to volunteer to get a shot .
An IPSOS survey of 15 countries published on Nov. 5 showed then that 54 % of French would have a COVID vaccine if one were available .
The figure was 64 % in Italy and Spain , 79 % in Britain and 87 % in China .
Since then things have gone far worse , and a more recent IFOP poll showed that only 41 % people in France would take the shot .
This means that a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Swedes , where public trust in authorities is absurdly and inexplicably high , are interested in the vaccine , with at least one in three saying they won ’ t get the shot : “ If someone gave me 10 million euro , I wouldn ’ t take it , ” Lisa Renberg , 32 , told Reuters on Wednesday .
Meanwhile , in a paradoxical attempt to force more to sign up – not realizing that it will only have the precisely opposite effect – Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki urged Poles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , saying the herd immunity effect depended on them .
Critics have accused Warsaw ’ s “ nationalist leaders ” of being too accepting of anti-vaccination attitudes in the past in an effort to garner conservative support .
Well… let ’ s check back on said attitude in 10 years and see if perhaps it was the right one .
For now , however , the more European governments pressure their populations to get immunized , the fewer the people who will actually sign up and the worse the vaccine rollout will be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ % sure of .

According to the Israeli Health Ministry over 12,400 residents have tested positive for COVID-19 after being vaccinated with experimental Pfizer COVID-19 jjab shots.
He stated that at this stage it is still difficult to draw definitive conclusions about the effectiveness of the jjab, for better or worse.
Over 12,400 Israeli residents have tested positive for COVID-19 after being vaccinated, among them 69 people who had already gotten the second dose, which began to be administered early last week, the Israeli Health Ministry reported.
Of the 3,199 people who took coronavirus tests between day 22 and day 28 after the first jjab, 84 were found to be positive (2.6 percent), including 69 people who had already been vaccinated twice.
At this stage it is still difficult to draw definitive conclusions about the effectiveness of the jjab, for better or worse.
In some groups of inoculated people during the different post-jjab periods, the ratio of positive tests corresponds to the ratio of positive tests in the general population, the overwhelming majority of whom were not yet vaccinated.
There could also be issues related to the fact that most of those vaccinated first and who have thus accumulated the most post-vaccination time are over 60 years old.
According to Pfizer, the big jump in immunity is meant to come between day 15 and day 21, when the jjab’s effectiveness is meant to go from 52 percent to 89 percent, after which the second dose is meant to bring the vaccinated percent to a state of 95 percent protection.
But these statistics, encouraging as they are, cannot determine the level of protection the jjab grants each individual person.
Moreover, the more people are vaccinated, the more likely gaps will be found between Pfizer’s results in its clinical trials and results in the field, not just with regard to the level of the jjab’s effectiveness for individuals, but regarding its general effectiveness and ability to provide “herd immunity.”
This is especially true since it still isn’t clear to what degree the jjab protects against mutations of the virus.
Few days ago, the Louisiana woman who suffered uncontrollable convulsions after being administered the experimental Pfizer COVID-19 jjab was screened for permanent brain damage caused by the metals in the jjab.
Her son Brant Griner said that the hospital determined that she was experiencing a “neurological reaction,” he said, adding that doctors believe the medical condition was caused by “the metals in the jjab.”
As reported by GreatGameIndia earlier, Pfizer has paid $2.3 billion in the largest healthcare fraud settlement in history to resolve criminal and civil liability arising from the illegal promotion of certain pharmaceutical products.
Even, the US government paid over $57 million in compensation for jjab injuries and deaths until March 2020, and over $1 Billion in the past five years.
According to the co-founder of BioNTech Dr Ugur Sahin, the COVID-19 jjab he designed for Pfizer was designed in just few hours in a single day on January 25, 2020. No other jjab in history has been created and manufactured so quickly. Previously, the fastest jjab ever developed took more than four years.
Even, Moderna’s coronavirus jjab also took just two days to design.
According to pharma giant Moderna, the COVID-19 mRNA based experimental jabs are Operating System designed to program human DNA. These jjabs are being approved for emergency use for the first time in history.


humansarefree--2020-12-28--The Nashville ‘Suicide Bomber’ Narrative is False: NOT the Same RV!

The joke of the day is that after analyzing the DNA of the “ human remains ” found at the scene of the Nashville bomb , the FBI has just declared the bomber “ died of covid.
” Given the level of blatant disinformation being pushed by the deep state and a compliant fake news media , no one would be surprised to hear the FBI announce such an absurdity , perhaps followed by Anthony Fauci claiming that if you don ’ t get a vaccine , your vehicle might explode .
But something else just as absurd has now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ RV used in the bombing doesn ’ t match the RV found in the driveway of the supposed perpetrator .
With a hat tip to WhatDoesItMean.com , which pointed out this stunning observation , we can see that the RV depicted in the photo released by law enforcement has a single horizontal pin stripe near the roof , along the entire driver ’ s side of the vehicle : ( see the pin stripe along the edge of the roof ) .
While the RV parked at the residence of Anthony Quinn Warner @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a suicide bomber — has two pin stripes along the driver ’ s side .
In other words , anyone who can count to two can also see that this isn ’ t the same RV .
The red outline square in the two images above also shows a key difference in the appearance of another feature — possibly a vent — that looks completely different in the two photos .
Check out the pictures below : In other words , it ’ s not the same RV .
Someone in the deep @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the AT & T / NSA spy hub failed to notice the difference in the vehicles , and they ended up choosing an RV with the wrong number of pin stripes .
This bombing was a deep state mission to destroy something in the AT & T building… no doubt something related to election rigging The real target of the bombing was , of course , the equipment found inside the hardened AT & T building : The entire “ Anthony Quinn Warner ” suicide story is nothing but a cover story @ @ @ @ @ @ @ establishment is now trying to blame Warner ’ s actions on “ 5G paranoia , ” simultaneously blaming 5G critics for the bombing that was actually carried out by the deep state , working in conjunction with black hat units inside the US military ( Army in particular ) .
As we reported yesterday , [ something that resembles ] a “ missile trail ” is clearly seen dropping from the sky to the ground right before the explosion took place : You can see the alleged “ missile trail ” timing more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ preserved at Brighteon.com : This explosion appears to have initiated slightly above the RV itself , not from within the RV .
We are currently calling it a “ missile , ” although others have pointed out the possibility that this could be the result of a Direct Energy Weapon ( DEW ) fired from orbiting weapons platforms .
My Situation Update for Dec. 27th reveals more details about this “ data wipeout ” operation and who ’ s likely behind it :

The joke of the day is that after analyzing the DNA of the “human remains” found at the scene of the Nashville bomb, the FBI has just declared the bomber “died of covid.”
Given the level of blatant disinformation being pushed by the deep state and a compliant fake news media, no one would be surprised to hear the FBI announce such an absurdity, perhaps followed by Anthony Fauci claiming that if you don’t get a jjab, your vehicle might explode.
But something else just as absurd has now been found by internet sleuths: The RV used in the bombing doesn’t match the RV found in the driveway of the supposed perpetrator.
The difference isn’t even subtle. It’s obvious.
With a hat tip to WhatDoesItMean.com, which pointed out this stunning observation, we can see that the RV depicted in the photo released by law enforcement has a single horizontal pin stripe near the roof, along the entire driver’s side of the vehicle: (see the pin stripe along the edge of the roof).
While the RV parked at the residence of Anthony Quinn Warner — whom the FBI is publicly calling a suicide bomber — has two pin stripes along the driver’s side. In other words, anyone who can count to two can also see that this isn’t the same RV.
The red outline square in the two images above also shows a key difference in the appearance of another feature — possibly a vent — that looks completely different in the two photos.
Check out the pictures below:
In other words, it’s not the same RV.
Someone in the deep state who was pulling off this bombing of the AT&T / NSA spy hub failed to notice the difference in the vehicles, and they ended up choosing an RV with the wrong number of pin stripes.
(This is easy to overlook, as we didn’t notice this at first either.)
This bombing was a deep state mission to destroy something in the AT&T building… no doubt something related to election rigging
The real target of the bombing was, of course, the equipment found inside the hardened AT&T building:
The entire “Anthony Quinn Warner” suicide story is nothing but a cover story. As a bonus narrative, the establishment is now trying to blame Warner’s actions on “5G paranoia,” simultaneously blaming 5G critics for the bombing that was actually carried out by the deep state, working in conjunction with black hat units inside the US military (Army in particular).
As we reported yesterday, [something that resembles] a “missile trail” is clearly seen dropping from the sky to the ground right before the explosion took place:
You can see the alleged “missile trail” timing more clearly in this skyline video, now preserved at Brighteon.com:

This explosion appears to have initiated slightly above the RV itself, not from within the RV. We are currently calling it a “missile,” although others have pointed out the possibility that this could be the result of a Direct Energy Weapon (DEW) fired from orbiting weapons platforms.
My Situation Update for Dec. 27th reveals more details about this “data wipeout” operation and who’s likely behind it:

Source: Hangthecensors.com