humansarefree--2020-12-12--NJ Lawmaker Wants MANDATORY Corona Shot For All Kids WITHOUT EXEMPTION

A State Senator in New Jersey wants the coronavirus vaccine made mandatory for all school age children , despite them being the least at risk group .
Middlesex Democrat Senator Joseph Vitale also wants to eliminate exemptions that have been used in the past to prevent their children from receiving shots .
“ When it is that a vaccine is appropriate for children , I believe it ought to be included in that list of vaccines that are required for children , ” Vitale told reporters .
“ I ’ d like to incorporate it into the other vaccination bill @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as a condition to entering school , ” he added .
Vitale also says there is a separate effort underway to make the vaccine mandatory for University students in the state .
“ It ’ s not complicated to decide whether or not to include a COVID vaccine as a condition of school , ” he said , adding “ The decision is going to be whether or not the vaccine is available , and if the science supports its efficacy.
” New Jersey currently mandates that children must have several vaccines in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , polio , and chickenpox .
However , thousands of children have been exempted from the shots , with parents citing religious beliefs .
There was an attempt last year by lawmakers to eliminate such exemptions and mandate the vaccinations across the board , but it failed when angry parents stormed the statehouse : While New Jersey officials have stopped short of saying they will force everyone to get the vaccine , Governor Phil Murphy has signed an executive order that will see everyone who does get it automatically enrolled into a ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a move that some have seen as a way of coercing people to take the shot .
Speaking to reporters , Sue Collins , co-founder of the New Jersey Coalition for Vaccine Choice said “ Putting the cart before the horse and saying when it ’ s available everyone has to get it does not build trust.
” “ No medical procedure should ever be mandated for anyone — especially something so new , with so many unknowns and no long-term knowledge at all , ” Collins added .
Pushing back against the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state , Republican Assemblyman Gerry Scharfenberger , has sponsored a bill to prevent it from becoming compulsory .
While he says he is not anti-vaccine , Scharfenberger says he can not support mandating medication , and is responding to the concerns of constituents .
The developments in New Jersey come after a State Assemblymember in New York introduced legislation that would make it compulsory for residents to get vaccinated against coronavirus .
Democrat Linda Rosenthal said she introduced the bill because “ there has been a “ concerning uptick in dangerous anti-science , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ FDA approves the vaccine for children , there will likely be a torrent of states moving to add it to the compulsory vaccination list for school kids .
Reports have suggested that Pfizer has begun conducting some tests of its vaccine on children , with Moderna also scheduling trials for tests on kids .
Currently , California , Mississippi and West Virginia are the only states that allow medical exemptions to vaccinations , according to the National Conference of State Legislatures .
A further 30 states , including New Jersey , currently allow @ @ @ @ @ @ @ still allowing exemptions for religious and personal or philosophical beliefs .

Across Europe, supposedly in reaction to rises in the numbers of coronavirus cases, many national governments are imposing increased crackdowns that severely restrict the exercise of liberty.
These coronavirus cases are in large part derived from testing that produces many false positives and that is often conducted on relatively young and healthy people who have very little risk of dying or even becoming seriously sick from a coronavirus infection.
Of course, the European politicians exerting their newly increased power say “the science” supports their tyrannical actions.
And they will tend to give platforms to doctors and other scientists who back up those claims while ignoring or deriding the many doctors and other scientists who disagree.
If Joe Biden were president of the United States now, we can expect he would be following the course of these European power grabbers.
The only likely reasons for restraint, aside from the potential of overwhelming popular revolt, would be if Biden had already implemented and maintained a countrywide crackdown of such high degree that he thought he could not feasibly increase it further or if congressional opposition or court orders managed to stop him.
In an August interview with David Muir at ABC, Muir asked Biden if Biden would shut down the country if “the scientists” say to do so because of coronavirus.
Biden replied, “I would shut it down; I would listen to the scientists.”
Of course, the scientists Biden is referring to are people like Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx who have helped stir up and maintain overblown fear of coronavirus and support for state and local crackdowns while members of President Donald Trump’s coronavirus task force.
Biden is not referring to people like Scott Atlas, a more recently added coronavirus advisor of Trump, who argues that much of the government action taken in the name of countering coronavirus cause more harm than good.
Biden also reiterated in the ABC interview his commitment to imposing a national mask mandate.
Keep in mind that Biden, in the ABC interview, is talking about both what he would do at the time of the interview and what he would do as president after he takes office on January 20 — about three months from now, five months after the interview, and ten months after crackdowns began to be imposed across America.
He seems content to impose extraordinary mandates on Americans for a long time.
In large part this appears to be the case because Biden places little or no value on the average American’s freedom.
Biden, in the ABC interview, provides this response to people who say a mask mandate “impacts on their freedom”:
Come on. Give me a break. It’s about saving lives.
Biden disregards freedom. He disregards science as well given that the evidence indicates wearing masks does not prevent coronavirus infection and does damage health.
The beginning portion of the Thursday presidential debate was dedicated to discussion by Biden and President Donald Trump regarding coronavirus policy.
The exchange presented a sharp contrast in views related to coronavirus policy. Biden described the upcoming situation with coronavirus in America by saying “we’re about to go into a dark winter,” a hyperbolic description supporting his advocacy for imposing draconian countrywide mandates.
If he wins, Biden will take office during that winter. In contrast, Trump said in the debate “no we’re not gonna shut down.”
In regard to crackdowns continuing on local and state levels, Trump stated, “we have to open our country.”
Trump further stated that “the cure cannot be worse than the problem itself, and that’s what’s happening.”
Also, unlike Biden, Trump has been very sparing in his wearing of masks and has never proposed a national mandate.
In October, European nations have imposed and expanded draconian mandates in the name of countering coronavirus.
Meanwhile, some American states and local governments have eased up on coronavirus mandates while others have increased them.
Should Biden become president in January, expect him to act to make the coronavirus crackdown in American go countrywide and go big.
Copyright © 2020 by RonPaul Institute.


humansarefree--2020-12-12--Melinda Gates is ‘Incredibly Disappointed’ that Trump is Putting Americans First in Line for COVID V

Melinda Gates is ‘Incredibly Disappointed’ that Trump is Putting Americans First in Line for COVID Vaccine

If ever you wanted proof that many if not most of our elites don ’ t care about everyday Americans , watch what Melinda Gates said in response to CNN host Poppy Harlow yesterday when discussing President Trump ’ s executive order giving her fellow Americans ( the ones paying the taxes that supported research and are paying for them ) priority in access to COVID vaccines .
“ The president just signed an executive order to try to put Americans at the front of the line when it comes to vaccines , ” CNN host Poppy Harlow said , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s what you were worried about when you kept saying and warning against vaccine nationalism ?
” “ That ’ s exactly what we were worried about , ” Melinda Gates responded .
“ I knew it was coming and I was just incredibly disappointed.
” “ I ’ m much more optimistic about the president-elect and the COVID task force , this eminent task force that he has put together , ” Melinda Gates said with a smile on her face .
“ I think we ’ re going to see @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the United States , but that starts , you know , January 20 and we have still some dark months to live ahead until then.
” Also read : Melinda Gates Appears On Today Show Pushing Hard For A Global Vaccine While Wearing An Upside-Down Cross Melinda Gates is not just the wife of a rich guy ; she is co-chair of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation , with $ 51 billion in assets , about four times the size of the Ford Foundation , and able , via its grants , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that have an impact on every American .
Take a good look at the eyes and face of this woman who wields enormous power .

by Arjun Walia (excerpt)
A letter to the editor published in the New England Journal of Medicine titled “Open Schools, Covid-19, and Child and Teacher Morbidity in Sweden” has found that:
“Despite Sweden’s having kept schools and preschools open, we found a low incidence of severe Covid-19 among schoolchildren and children of preschool age during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic… No child with Covid-19 died… Among the 1,951,905 million children who were 1 to 16 years of age, 15 children had Covid-19, MIS-C, or both conditions and were admitted to an ICU, which is equal to 1 child in 130,000.”
It was published by Jonas F Ludvigsson a paediatrician at Örebro University Hospital and professor of clinical epidemiology at the Karolinska Institute.
The study also showed that “fewer than 10 preschool teachers and 20 schoolteachers in Sweden received intensive care for Covid-19 up until June 30, 2020 (20 per 103,596 school teachers, which is equal to 19 per 100,000).
As compared with other occupations (excluding health care workers), this corresponded to sex- and age-adjusted relative risks of 1.10 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 2.49) among preschool teachers and 0.43 (95% CI, 0.28 to 0.68) among schoolteachers.
In a Karolinska Institute press release, Ludvigsson indicated he was hopeful about the results.
“It is very gratifying that serious COVID-19, defined here as needing treatment in an intensive care unit, is so rare among children despite schools being open during the pandemic,” he said.
“The next step will be to follow up the children who were treated in an intensive care unit for COVID-19 to see if they have recovered fully. My gut feeling is that children who have been seriously ill because of MIS-C seem to recover fully eventually.”
After he published this piece, an article published in the British Medical Journal on the 18th of February by Ingrid Torjesen states the following:
The Swedish government has said that it will strengthen laws on academic freedom after a leading Swedish academic announced that he was quitting his work on covid-19 because of an onslaught of intimidating comments from people who disagreed or disliked his research findings….
After the letter’s publication he was bombarded with angry messages through social media and email criticising the study and inferring that it and Ludvigsson were representative of the country’s covid-19 containment strategy.
The experience has taken its toll on Ludvigsson. He told the journal of the Swedish Medical Association (Lakartidningen) that for a week he woke up at 3 am every night and could not get back to sleep and that he had now lost his appetite for covid-19—both when it comes to speaking out and researching. He has decided to quit researching and debating covid-19.
He is trying to put the experience behind him and has said that he will not talk to the media about what happened. However, he told The BMJ that, although the findings were published in a research letter, this was “an actual study” that underwent formal external peer review, including statistical peer review, and the manuscript was revised four times before it was published.
Intimidation and threats against academics have risen with the growth of social media, and uncertainties and diverse opinions about covid-19 have added to the situation. In response, Sweden is planning to provide increased support for academic freedom through an amendment to its Higher Education Act.
Matilda Ernkrans, Sweden’s minister for higher education and research, told The BMJ:
“It is deeply concerning when academics are threatened to the extent that they don’t have the courage to keep on doing their job.
“This is not a new phenomenon, but we have seen an increase of threats against academics related to research on the coronavirus. When people are silenced, it’s a threat against the freedom of speech and our democracy.
“To strengthen academic freedom, the Swedish government has proposed a new amendment that points out that education and research must be protected to enable people to freely discover, research, and share knowledge.”
Ole Petter Ottersen, president of the Karolinska Institute, told The BMJ that he found the increase in threats and harassment towards researchers very worrying.
“A tough debate and a diversity of opinions based on facts and evidence are necessary elements of science and public discourse, but hateful and scornful accusations and personal attacks cannot be tolerated.
“We already see that researchers retreat from the public debate after being threatened or harassed, and in my own institution a leading researcher just decided to give up his covid-19 research for the same reason,” he added, referring to Ludvigsson.
Given that the Karolinska Institute seems to be the focus here as well, I thought I’d mention that professor Anna-Mia Elkström, an epidemiologist from the Institute and professor Stefan Swartling Peterson, have gone through the data from UNICEF and UNAIDS, and come to the conclusion that least as many people have died as a result of the restrictions to fight COVID as have died of COVID directly.


humansarefree--2020-12-12--Survey: Most FDNY Firefighters Plan to Refuse Pfizer COVID Vaccine

A survey of firefighters with the Fire Department of New York City ( FDNY ) found that more than half of respondents would refuse a coronavirus vaccine if offered .
Over 2,000 firefighters , a figure which equals about 25 % of the department ’ s 8,000-strong force , responded to the poll , Uniformed Firefighters Association ( UFA ) President Andrew Ansbro told the New York Post .
The poll asked firefighters , “ Will you get the COVID-19 Vaccine from Pfizer when the Department makes it available ?
” with “ Yes ” or “ No ” answers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ % of the total respondents , said they would not get the vaccine while 929 , or 45.3 % , said they would .
Luckily for those hesitant to receive the vaccine , the FDNY announced last week that it would not make the vaccine mandatory for its members , a policy expected to be followed by all city agencies , including hospitals .
What the Post calls a “ stunning anti-vax response ” follows an August survey of Metropolitan Transit Authority workers that showed just 30 percent of respondents were definitely willing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ undecided and 32 percent said they would definitely not receive the vaccine , according to the poll of Transport Workers Union members conducted by the NYU School of Global Public Health .
“ The main reason for not taking it or being unsure was the lack of trust in its safety , ” said NYU researchers according to the Post .
Respondents said “ the main sources of trusted , reliable information included : personal healthcare provider , CDC , Governor Cuomo , and the TWU leadership .
“ A sizeable portion said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ researchers stated .
As for the reluctance of the city ’ s firefighters to take the vaccine , Ansbro suggests that they feel more comfortable with the risks of the virus versus the potential risks of the vaccine .
“ A lot of them probably feel they are not in a risk category , they are younger , stronger , they may have already had it and gotten through it , and feel it ’ s not their problem , ” Ansbro said .
“ They are more familiar with the coronavirus than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s not just firefighters and public transit workers who are skeptical about the coronavirus vaccine — even the city ’ s EMS workers , who are on the short list to receive the vaccine early , have their doubts .
“ A few are anxious to get it , but there have been a few dozen responses saying , ‘ Thanks , but no thanks , ’ ” said Oren Barzilay , president of the Uniformed EMTs , Paramedics and Fire Inspectors union .
“ They were thankful it was not mandatory @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be looked at as test subjects.
” “ I personally am going to wait and see what the side effects are , what the independent studies show ” before being vaccinated , Barzilay himself told the Post .
The widespread hesitancy to receive the vaccine is pushing some to call for it to be mandated after all .
“ It may become necessary to require that certain individuals or communities be vaccinated , such as health care workers and students , to protect the public ’ s health , ” said Mary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fordham University and chair of the NYS Bar Association ’ s COVID-19 task force , in a statement calling for the state to make the vaccine mandatory .

One can step back from all the MK Ultra mind control through the propaganda of the mainstream media and lying politicians and clearly see that the CON-vid hysteria is the invisible enemy tyrants are using to push forward both the United Nations’ Agenda 21 and advance toward Agenda 2030.
Below is an infographic that provides the 12 step plan of using a virtually unproven “virus” to bring about the New World Order, and it’s right on schedule unless the people stop it.
Currently, we are on step 8 and moving quickly towards step 9:
After step 9, all bets are off because by that time, most small businesses will be out of business due to unlawful lockdowns, and the only businesses open with be giant online corporations who are making a killing from the lockdown even now.
Already we are told there are “coin shortages” and many stores are demanding payments by card rather than cash unless you have the correct amount.
Seriously, the above roadmap seems to be right on track with what we are seeing advance our way.
It’s time the people awake from their slumber, turn off the television, quit believing the narrative of the “right/left” paradigm and start shutting down tyrants and defending liberty!
Source: Sonsoflibertymedia.com


humansarefree--2020-12-12--The Betrayal is Now Complete: SCOTUS Dismissal of Texas Lawsuit Illuminates Final Remaining Option t

The Betrayal is Now Complete: SCOTUS Dismissal of Texas Lawsuit Illuminates Final Remaining Option to Save the Republic

Tonight the US Supreme Court chose to dismiss the Texas lawsuit for lack of standing .
The court did not hear the merits of the case , nor did it decide on them .
It simply declared that Democrat-controlled states can rig elections , commit ballot fraud , cheat and steal in whatever way they want even if their actions are wildly unfair to the other states which are impacted by the outcome of federal elections .
As of tonight , December 11 , 2020 , we no longer live in a functioning constitutional republic .
There is no longer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in America .
Even the death of Ginsburg , it seems , was not enough to lend the court a majority of jurists who might choose to uphold the rule of law .
The rule of law has now collapsed .
The courts no longer even pretend to function .
Censorship is extreme , the media print brazen lies and the elections are so blatantly rigged that the cheating is carried out on camera , for all to see .
Yet every last American is apparently powerless to stop the election theft , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nation — and which hate liberty and justice — are now aligned against any functioning civil court action which might recognize and reverse the great injustices that have been carried out against this nation by Democrats and deep state traitors .
Yet despite overwhelming , irrefutable evidence of blatant election rigging , fraud and foreign interference , local judges are too corrupt to hear the cases , district courts are too corrupt to decide on the cases , and the highest court in the land is too corrupt to even grant the case @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into lawlessness by the US Supreme Court .
There is no coming back from the path of emerging history that SCOTUS has just set into motion , and this path will be slathered with the blood of patriots and tyrants .
Every peaceful option to resolve this election has now been exhausted .
The remaining options will all involve kinetic engagement .
America will now bleed .
This is certain .
Why on Earth do you NOT want to at least hear the case and show the American people you care about the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ achieved on the remaining option The final option now remaining to save the republic is President Trump ’ s “ national security ” option , which would mirror the actions of Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War .
Trump must now declare the fraudulent election to be an act of cyber warfare against America , deploy the military to key cities , and initiate mass arrests of court judges , mayors , governors , election officials , complicit “ journalists , ” members of Congress and everyone else who has colluded in this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of America .
Fortunately , this is precisely the option for which President Trump has been preparing since at least September of 2018 .
I have been covering these preparations in my Situation Update podcasts , which bring to light activities of the DoD , DIA , SpecOps forces and cyber warfare soldiers , all of which are preparing for Trump to give the green light on an operation that would take down America ’ s enemies with ferocity and determination .
Trump now surely realizes this plan is the only remaining option @ @ @ @ @ @ @ United States of America against enemies foreign and domestic .
SCOTUS has just handed Trump the clarity he needed to carry out this historic , necessary step to defend this republic in its final hour , when enemies across the country and around the world believe they have succeeded in their suffocation of liberty and the planned demise of the United States of America .
Here is Friday ’ s podcast , which reveals all the actions already under way to prepare Special Operations forces and pro-America elements of the DoD for their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all : The saving of our constitutional republic .
The question now is : Will Trump find the courage to give the order ?
If he does not , America falls to communist China and is plunged into unrestricted domestic warfare / civil war .

Tonight the US Supreme Court chose to dismiss the Texas lawsuit for lack of standing. The court did not hear the merits of the case, nor did it decide on them.
It simply declared that Democrat-controlled states can rig elections, commit ballot fraud, cheat and steal in whatever way they want even if their actions are wildly unfair to the other states which are impacted by the outcome of federal elections.
As of tonight, December 11, 2020, we no longer live in a functioning constitutional republic.
There is no longer any controlling legal authority that is functioning in America.
Even the death of Ginsburg, it seems, was not enough to lend the court a majority of jurists who might choose to uphold the rule of law.
The rule of law has now collapsed. The courts no longer even pretend to function.
Censorship is extreme, the media print brazen lies and the elections are so blatantly rigged that the cheating is carried out on camera, for all to see.
Yet every last American is apparently powerless to stop the election theft, for all the forces that despise this nation — and which hate liberty and justice — are now aligned against any functioning civil court action which might recognize and reverse the great injustices that have been carried out against this nation by Democrats and deep state traitors.
Yet despite overwhelming, irrefutable evidence of blatant election rigging, fraud and foreign interference, local judges are too corrupt to hear the cases, district courts are too corrupt to decide on the cases, and the highest court in the land is too corrupt to even grant the case legal standing.
America has been plunged into lawlessness by the US Supreme Court. There is no coming back from the path of emerging history that SCOTUS has just set into motion, and this path will be slathered with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Every peaceful option to resolve this election has now been exhausted. The remaining options will all involve kinetic engagement.
America will now bleed. This is certain.
Why on Earth do you NOT want to at least hear the case and show the American people you care about the Constitution?
Great clarity has now been achieved on the remaining option
The final option now remaining to save the republic is President Trump’s “national security” option, which would mirror the actions of Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War.
Trump must now declare the fraudulent election to be an act of cyber warfare against America, deploy the military to key cities, and initiate mass arrests of court judges, mayors, governors, election officials, complicit “journalists,” members of Congress and everyone else who has colluded in this criminal conspiracy to overthrow the United States of America.
Fortunately, this is precisely the option for which President Trump has been preparing since at least September of 2018.
I have been covering these preparations in my Situation Update podcasts, which bring to light activities of the DoD, DIA, SpecOps forces and cyber warfare soldiers, all of which are preparing for Trump to give the green light on an operation that would take down America’s enemies with ferocity and determination.
Trump now surely realizes this plan is the only remaining option to fulfill his oath to defend the United States of America against enemies foreign and domestic.
SCOTUS has just handed Trump the clarity he needed to carry out this historic, necessary step to defend this republic in its final hour, when enemies across the country and around the world believe they have succeeded in their suffocation of liberty and the planned demise of the United States of America.
Here is Friday’s podcast, which reveals all the actions already under way to prepare Special Operations forces and pro-America elements of the DoD for their finest hour and most important mission of all: The saving of our constitutional republic.

The question now is: Will Trump find the courage to give the order?
If he does not, America falls to communist China and is plunged into unrestricted domestic warfare / civil war.
By Mike Adams, Guest writer


humansarefree--2020-12-13--Real-World Outdoor Experiment Destroys Global Warming Narrative: As CO2 Naturally Rises From 0.1% to

Real-World Outdoor Experiment Destroys Global Warming Narrative: As CO2 Naturally Rises From 0.1% to 75%, Surface Temperatures Drop 10°C

At an outdoor test site in Italy CO2 concentrations vacillating between 1,000 and 750,000 ppm have no more or less an effect on local temperatures than a nearby site with stable , ambient ( < 400 ppm ) CO2 concentrations .
Mofette fields are “ natural carbon dioxide springs ” that allow us to observe the effect that a 100 % ( 1,000,000 ppm ) CO2 concentration has on ecosystems , temperatures…even spiders ( Balkenhol et al.
, 2016 ) .
Temperature changes over the CO2-spewing Bossoleto spring in Tuscany , Italy , were measured over the course of a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Van Gardingen et al.
, 1995 .
The scientists observed the site ’ s CO2 rises daily from 1,000 ppm at 3:30 p.m. in the afternoon to 750,000 ppm by 7:00 a.m. the next morning .
The temperature changes associated with these extreme CO2 variations are about 33°C at 3:30 p.m. , falling to 23°C by 7 a.m. More specifically , when the Sun rises above the horizon , temperatures abruptly warm by 10°C and then CO2 rapidly falls from its morning peak ( 750,000 ppm ) to its afternoon nadir ( 1,000 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , where CO2 levels center around an ambient 360 ppm ( 1992 levels ) throughout the day , Gardingen and colleagues observed temperature changes to be effectively identical to the Bossoleto site : 23°C at 7 a.m. and 33°C at 3:30 p.m .
In other words , the CO2 concentration – whether a stable 0.036 % throughout the day or a wildly fluctuating 0.1 % to 75 % over the course of a 24-hour period – had no detectable effect on changes to the surface temperature .
This real-world temperature-CO2 experiment would appear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ environmental factors , but it does not appear to causally affect temperature changes .

by Kenneth Richard
At an outdoor test site in Italy CO2 concentrations vacillating between 1,000 and 750,000 ppm have no more or less an effect on local temperatures than a nearby site with stable, ambient (<400 ppm) CO2 concentrations.
Mofette fields are “natural carbon dioxide springs” that allow us to observe the effect that a 100% (1,000,000 ppm) CO2 concentration has on ecosystems, temperatures…even spiders (Balkenhol et al., 2016).
Temperature changes over the CO2-spewing Bossoleto spring in Tuscany, Italy, were measured over the course of a few days in the early 1990s by Van Gardingen et al., 1995.
The scientists observed the site’s CO2 rises daily from 1,000 ppm at 3:30 p.m. in the afternoon to 750,000 ppm by 7:00 a.m. the next morning.
The temperature changes associated with these extreme CO2 variations are about 33°C at 3:30 p.m., falling to 23°C by 7 a.m.
More specifically, when the Sun rises above the horizon, temperatures abruptly warm by 10°C and then CO2 rapidly falls from its morning peak (750,000 ppm) to its afternoon nadir (1,000 ppm).
At a nearby site, where CO2 levels center around an ambient 360 ppm (1992 levels) throughout the day, Gardingen and colleagues observed temperature changes to be effectively identical to the Bossoleto site: 23°C at 7 a.m. and 33°C at 3:30 p.m.
In other words, the CO2 concentration – whether a stable 0.036% throughout the day or a wildly fluctuating 0.1% to 75% over the course of a 24-hour period – had no detectable effect on changes to the surface temperature.
This real-world temperature-CO2 experiment would appear to show CO2 varies in response to environmental factors, but it does not appear to causally affect temperature changes.


humansarefree--2020-12-13--Americans Said No to Coronavirus Contact Tracing Spy Apps

When the NHS , Britain ’ s socialized medicine system , debuted its contact tracing app , six million eagerly rushed to download it .
After a few days , 10 million had downloaded and installed the app , and after a month , around 40 % of smartphone users had put a monitoring device on their phones that would trace their social interactions and could tell them to isolate at any moment .
In October , Governor Cuomo launched a New York contact tracing app based on technology from Google and Apple , and some assistance from Bloomberg ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ going to not only bring contact tracing to a new level , ” Cuomo boasted , while claiming that it wouldn ’ t violate anyone ’ s privacy .
Few New Yorkers seemed to believe him .
Despite being available in Spanish , Chinese , Bengali , Korean , Russian , Haitian Creole , and , even more unexpectedly , English , the app hasn ’ t taken off and Cuomo ’ s regime has refused to reveal the data that would actually show if it ’ s tracking positive cases .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ second biggest story about Cuomo ’ s mismanagement of the pandemic , after the deaths of 11,000 nursing home residents when his administration forced nursing homes to accept infected patients .
The numbers are likely higher , but the Cuomo administration , in its typical fashion , is refusing to release the data .
After a month , only 5 % of New Yorkers have downloaded Cuomo ’ s spy app .
That ’ s far short of the 60 % that ’ s needed for contact tracing to work .
Even Europeans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ target .
Few outside Communist China have .
Apple and Google claimed that they needed at least 15 % .
Only a few states in America hit that bar and they tend to have small populations that lean leftward .
Most Americans have opted out .
Governor Murphy launched his state ’ s contact tracing app to great fanfare , urging a , “ shared sense of personal responsibility to support our contact tracing efforts ” .
Only 4 % of New Jersey residents decided to take up the former Goldman Sachs tycoon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like Cuomo , had forced nursing homes to accept infected coronavirus patients .
Some of the state ’ s deadliest outbreaks had also taken place in state hospitals for veterans .
Pennsylvania ’ s Governor Wolf and Secretary of Health Richard Levine , debuted their contact tracing app in September .
“ We won ’ t know who has downloaded the app , who has received notifications and who used symptom check , ” Richard ( Rachel ) Levine , who had taken his mother out of a nursing home and into a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ take in infected patients , assured Pennsylvanians .
Only 4 % of Pennsylavanians were convinced .
Richard Levine has begun pleading with 13-year-olds to download the app .
If there ’ s anything that ’ s bound to reassure state residents , it ’ s a strange man in a blonde wig urging their children to download an app to monitor them .
Contact tracing app adoption in America isn ’ t likely to get much better even with more time .
Governor Northam rolled out a contact tracing app in Virginia back @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the state has passed Google ’ s 15 % bar with an estimated 19 % of smartphone owners having installed the app .
But few people are actually using it .
Only 553 people submitted their positive results out of 100,000 positive tests in the state .
While Democrat governors and their European counterparts have brandished download figures , many people download apps and then uninstall them .
Or leave them on and then pay no further attention to them .
The actual utilization of contact tracing apps is laughably miniscule .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ still only comes out to 553 people submitting results .
That ’ s why Governor Cuomo in New York and the NHS in the UK refuse to release their impact numbers .
Considering the performance of contact tracing apps in Europe , it ’ s not hard to guess what they ’ re hiding .
Italy ’ s Immuni app was downloaded by 14 % of the population , but only had 155 positive results submitted in three months .
In France , after 2.3 million downloads , only 72 risk contacts were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be badgered into passively downloading an app , but when it comes time to upload their results and have the system notify everyone they ’ ve been around , they just as passively choose not to do it and the system fails .
After a year of touting contact tracing as the answer , the assault on privacy has stalled .
Contact tracing apps have failed miserably in New York , New Jersey , and Pennsylvania .
California only got around to launching its contact tracing app now .
The numbers are worse @ @ @ @ @ @ @ country with only 8 million Americans actually using contact tracing apps .
Trust is the biggest factor in the adoption of contact tracing apps .
And very few Americans trust Big Tech , the government and its public health experts with tracking their lives and the lives of those around them .
The NHS app intends to start asking users about their personal lives to “ score ” their lifestyles for coronavirus risk .
It ’ s easy enough to see this sort of thing as not only a privacy violation , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ public surveillance and social credit system .
In a socialized medicine system where people are already penalized for their risk factors by being denied access to medical care , leaving them with few options except emigration or death where age or obesity can mean a denial of medical care , and where babies can be killed because saving them is not deemed to be the best use of resources , a “ score ” isn ’ t just a score .
Few people want to be denied medical treatment because they failed the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ most likely to see the downside of such calculations and the more conservative parts of the United States have the lowest utilization rates of contract tracing apps .
Nevada ’ s contact tracing app was only downloaded 70,000 times , as of last month , and zero exposures were registered in September .
In Wyoming , its app only managed 5,000 downloads .
South Carolina ’ s legislature banned the use of contact tracing apps by government agencies .
But all of that may be about to change if the Democrats succeed in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ White House .
Biden ’ s team is filled with Big Tech lobbyists and strongly favors a national contact tracing app infrastructure .
While the Trump administration allowed states to define their own policy , the Democrat plan has been to nationalize the crisis and control the response .
Key to their plans is the creation of a national server that would store information across state lines , and allow national authorities to monitor everyone ’ s movements even if they leave a state .
Ten states have already moved their codes to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the Association of Public Health Laboratories .
Another five are following suit .
As of now , virtually every state and area , such as D.C. , with a contact tracing app , is on the National Key Server .
That includes heavily populated states such as California , New York , and Michigan .
The hodgepodge of apps and approaches will be replaced by one system to rule them all .
Scott Becker , the CEO of the Association of Public Health Laboratories , has also been touting Biden ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ national server will make a national contact tracing app much easier to implement .
Google , which is also involved in the national server using its own cloud system , has , along with Apple , rebranded “ contact tracing ” as “ exposure notification ” .
Big Tech decided that people were leery of “ contact tracing ” so they gave it a new name .
Meanwhile , Biden ’ s people have been coordinating with the Rockefeller Foundation on testing plans .
“ Policy makers , ” the Rockefeller Foundation had @ @ @ @ @ @ @ status of most Americans to be accessed and validated in a few required settings and many voluntary ones.
” Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito recently warned that the “ pandemic has resulted in previously unimaginable restrictions on individual liberty ” .
Despite that , under President Trump , Americans have still enjoyed an oasis of human rights compared to the brutal restrictions and measures in the rest of the world .
Red states were able to choose less restrictive and abusive routes for tackling the pandemic , even while blue states relentlessly violated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ public health emergency .
All of that may be coming to an end .
The near future may be a mandatory national app based either on the existing Apple or Google architecture embedded into virtually every smartphone , or , worse , GPS tracking like Norway ’ s app which was withdrawn after being panned by Amnesty International , linked to the National Key Server , which will serve as a key element of a national pandemic social credit system .
Americans rejected contact tracing , but a Biden administration won ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @

by Daniel Greenfield
When the NHS, Britain’s socialized medicine system, debuted its contact tracing app, six million eagerly rushed to download it. After a few days, 10 million had downloaded and installed the app, and after a month, around 40% of smartphone users had put a monitoring device on their phones that would trace their social interactions and could tell them to isolate at any moment.
In October, Governor Cuomo launched a New York contact tracing app based on technology from Google and Apple, and some assistance from Bloomberg’s organization.
“It’s going to not only bring contact tracing to a new level,” Cuomo boasted, while claiming that it wouldn’t violate anyone’s privacy.
Few New Yorkers seemed to believe him. Despite being available in Spanish, Chinese, Bengali, Korean, Russian, Haitian Creole, and, even more unexpectedly, English, the app hasn’t taken off and Cuomo’s regime has refused to reveal the data that would actually show if it’s tracking positive cases.
The lack of data transparency has been the second biggest story about Cuomo’s mismanagement of the pandemic, after the deaths of 11,000 nursing home residents when his administration forced nursing homes to accept infected patients. The numbers are likely higher, but the Cuomo administration, in its typical fashion, is refusing to release the data.
After a month, only 5% of New Yorkers have downloaded Cuomo’s spy app. That’s far short of the 60% that’s needed for contact tracing to work.
Even Europeans haven’t hit that 60% target. Few outside Communist China have.
Apple and Google claimed that they needed at least 15%. Only a few states in America hit that bar and they tend to have small populations that lean leftward. Most Americans have opted out.
Governor Murphy launched his state’s contact tracing app to great fanfare, urging a, “shared sense of personal responsibility to support our contact tracing efforts”. Only 4% of New Jersey residents decided to take up the former Goldman Sachs tycoon on his modest proposal.
Murphy, like Cuomo, had forced nursing homes to accept infected coronavirus patients. Some of the state’s deadliest outbreaks had also taken place in state hospitals for veterans.
Pennsylvania’s Governor Wolf and Secretary of Health Richard Levine, debuted their contact tracing app in September.
“We won’t know who has downloaded the app, who has received notifications and who used symptom check,” Richard (Rachel) Levine, who had taken his mother out of a nursing home and into a hotel, while forcing nursing homes to take in infected patients, assured Pennsylvanians.
Only 4% of Pennsylavanians were convinced. Richard Levine has begun pleading with 13-year-olds to download the app. If there’s anything that’s bound to reassure state residents, it’s a strange man in a blonde wig urging their children to download an app to monitor them.
Contact tracing app adoption in America isn’t likely to get much better even with more time.
Governor Northam rolled out a contact tracing app in Virginia back in August. After half a year, the state has passed Google’s 15% bar with an estimated 19% of smartphone owners having installed the app.
But few people are actually using it.
Only 553 people submitted their positive results out of 100,000 positive tests in the state.
While Democrat governors and their European counterparts have brandished download figures, many people download apps and then uninstall them. Or leave them on and then pay no further attention to them. The actual utilization of contact tracing apps is laughably miniscule.
Virginia’s 800,000 plus downloads figure still only comes out to 553 people submitting results.
That’s why Governor Cuomo in New York and the NHS in the UK refuse to release their impact numbers. Considering the performance of contact tracing apps in Europe, it’s not hard to guess what they’re hiding.
Italy’s Immuni app was downloaded by 14% of the population, but only had 155 positive results submitted in three months. In France, after 2.3 million downloads, only 72 risk contacts were flagged.
A lot of people can be badgered into passively downloading an app, but when it comes time to upload their results and have the system notify everyone they’ve been around, they just as passively choose not to do it and the system fails.
After a year of touting contact tracing as the answer, the assault on privacy has stalled.
Contact tracing apps have failed miserably in New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. California only got around to launching its contact tracing app now. The numbers are worse in much of the rest of the country with only 8 million Americans actually using contact tracing apps.
Trust is the biggest factor in the adoption of contact tracing apps. And very few Americans trust Big Tech, the government and its public health experts with tracking their lives and the lives of those around them.
The NHS app intends to start asking users about their personal lives to “score” their lifestyles for coronavirus risk. It’s easy enough to see this sort of thing as not only a privacy violation, but as an echo of China’s public surveillance and social credit system.
In a socialized medicine system where people are already penalized for their risk factors by being denied access to medical care, leaving them with few options except emigration or death where age or obesity can mean a denial of medical care, and where babies can be killed because saving them is not deemed to be the best use of resources, a “score” isn’t just a score.
Few people want to be denied medical treatment because they failed the social credit system.
Conservatives are the most likely to see the downside of such calculations and the more conservative parts of the United States have the lowest utilization rates of contract tracing apps.
Nevada’s contact tracing app was only downloaded 70,000 times, as of last month, and zero exposures were registered in September. In Wyoming, its app only managed 5,000 downloads.
South Carolina’s legislature banned the use of contact tracing apps by government agencies.
But all of that may be about to change if the Democrats succeed in their plan to place Biden in the White House.
Biden’s team is filled with Big Tech lobbyists and strongly favors a national contact tracing app infrastructure.
While the Trump administration allowed states to define their own policy, the Democrat plan has been to nationalize the crisis and control the response.
Key to their plans is the creation of a national server that would store information across state lines, and allow national authorities to monitor everyone’s movements even if they leave a state.
Ten states have already moved their codes to Microsoft’s National Key Server maintained for the Association of Public Health Laboratories. Another five are following suit.
As of now, virtually every state and area, such as D.C., with a contact tracing app, is on the National Key Server. That includes heavily populated states such as California, New York, and Michigan.
The hodgepodge of apps and approaches will be replaced by one system to rule them all.
Scott Becker, the CEO of the Association of Public Health Laboratories, has also been touting Biden’s plans for app contact tracing.
A national server will make a national contact tracing app much easier to implement. Google, which is also involved in the national server using its own cloud system, has, along with Apple, rebranded “contact tracing” as “exposure notification”.
Big Tech decided that people were leery of “contact tracing” so they gave it a new name.
Meanwhile, Biden’s people have been coordinating with the Rockefeller Foundation on testing plans.
“Policy makers,” the Rockefeller Foundation had urged, must “allow the infection status of most Americans to be accessed and validated in a few required settings and many voluntary ones.”
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito recently warned that the “pandemic has resulted in previously unimaginable restrictions on individual liberty”.
Despite that, under President Trump, Americans have still enjoyed an oasis of human rights compared to the brutal restrictions and measures in the rest of the world.
Red states were able to choose less restrictive and abusive routes for tackling the pandemic, even while blue states relentlessly violated civil rights under the guise of a public health emergency.
All of that may be coming to an end.
The near future may be a mandatory national app based either on the existing Apple or Google architecture embedded into virtually every smartphone, or, worse, GPS tracking like Norway’s app which was withdrawn after being panned by Amnesty International, linked to the National Key Server, which will serve as a key element of a national pandemic social credit system.
Americans rejected contact tracing, but a Biden administration won’t take no for an answer.


humansarefree--2020-12-13--Major Leak: List of 2 Million Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Members Around the World, Shows Pfizer a

Major Leak: List of 2 Million Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Members Around the World, Shows Pfizer and AstraZeneca Employed a Total of 123 Party Members

On Sunday Sky News in Australia that there was a major leak of a list of nearly 2 million CCP members , something never seen before .
The list exposes members who are working all over the world and also lifts the lid on how the party operates under Xi Jinping .
The list was allegedly extracted in 2016 by people believed to be Chinese dissidents , from a Shanghai server : “ A major leak containing a register with the details of nearly two million CCP members has occurred – exposing members who are now working all over the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on how the party operates under Xi Jinping , says Sharri Markson .
“ Ms Markson said the leak is a register with the details of Communist Party members , including their names , party position , birthday , national ID number and ethnicity .
“ It is believed to be the first leak of its kind in the world , ” the Sky News host said .
These individuals are embedded in some of the largest companies and inside some government agencies around the world .
The Epoch Times reported : The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Rolls-Royce , and Boeing employed hundreds of CCP members .
Here is the report from Sky News Australia :

In China, where firearms are tightly restricted, it’s probably no surprise that those who want to hurt people found another way to do it.
The dramatic rise of knife attacks around the world shows that the problem these days isn’t with guns. It’s with people.
Mass knife attacks have become so common over the years that a Chinese police department recently released a video to teach citizens how to defend themselves against knife-wielding assailants and it has gone viral, with 16 million views in just a few days.
It has subtitles and some great advice that even I would be able to follow.
All humor aside, some folks in the US who want to do away with the Second Amendment are probably saying smugly, “Well, knife attacks are bad, but only people with GUNS can kill dozens of victims quickly.”
Those folks would be wrong.
For example…
In 2014, 33 people were killed and 130 more were injured when a group of men coordinated a terror attack using knives at a train station in southwest China’s Yunnan Province.
In 2015, fifty workers at a Chinese coal mine were killed in a coordinated knife attack. Fifty more workers were injured.
In 2016, a facility for the disabled was attacked by a man with a knife. He killed 15 people and injured 45, then later surrendered himself to police.
In 2017, 18 people walking down a city street were injured when a man attacked them with a knife
13 people were seriously injured by a knife-wielding assailant at a shopping mall in Beijing earlier this year. One woman died from her injuries.
This tells me that it isn’t really a problem with guns. It’s a problem with people.
Instead of school shootings, they have school knifings
While in the United States, school shootings have become shockingly commonplace, what many don’t know is that in China, where gun control is strict, school knife attacks are a frequent threat.
On the very same day as the Sandy Hook shooting in the United States, a man with a knife injured 22 children and one adult at a school in Chenpeng village in the southern province of Guangxi.
Knife attacks at schools in China are common. Last year, a man climbed over the wall of a kindergarten and attacked 11 students. None suffered life-threatening injuries.
In 2016, a man in the southern province of Hainan stabbed 10 children before killing himself, authorities said. And another man killed three students at a school in 2014 before jumping off a building.
Perhaps the worst spate of stabbings occurred in 2010 when attackers targeted schools on three consecutive days. (source)
Just last month, a man wielding a knife killed 9 children and injured 10 others outside a middle school where he says he was bullied.
This isn’t just a problem in China
There have been mass knife attacks all over the world.
In the UK, there has been a deadly knife attack every third day of 2018. In 2017, Met Police recorded 37,443 recorded knife offenses and 6,694 gun offenses.
The problem is so bad that a judge has suggested banning the sale of large kitchen knives and that those who already have kitchen knives should file them down to avoid stabbings.
In 2016, two soldiers were attacked by a man with a knife in Belgium, and a few days ago, a prison inmate on day leave stabbed two police officers then took their guns and shot them.
Four people were injured and one was killed when a knife-wielding assailant attacked them in Paris last week.
These are just a few examples and I haven’t dug any further than the first page of Google. I could go on and on, but I think you get the point.
What happens if you take away guns
In each of these cases, something different was blamed.
Some of the attackers were shouting “Allahu Akbar” as they stabbed their victims.
Some of the attackers cited crippling stress.
Some of the attackers said they were bullied or mistreated.
Some of the attackers were mentally ill and had a history of psychological problems.
Some of the attackers had religious and ethnic differences from their victims.
One attacker just didn’t like disabled people.
You can’t fix people who want to harm others for their various reasons by taking away guns. You can only make it harder for the rest of us to defend ourselves against them.
Take away guns, and you get knives. Take away knives and you get improvised explosives [or they’ll use cars to plow through crowds of people]. There is no way to take away the yen that some people have to kill others.
And if I am involved in a knife-fight, well, personally, I’d rather take a gun.
By Daisy Luther, author of The Prepper’s Blueprint: The Step-By-Step Guide To Help You Through Any Disaster


humansarefree--2020-12-13--Experts: 1.7 Million-Year-Old Man-Made Bridge Shatters Mainstream History

A 1.7 million-year-old ‘ bridge ’ is the ultimate evidence that humans have been on Earth much longer than thought claims expert .
“ The ratio of 10:1 ( length : width ) fits the actual measurements of the bridge observed today.
” The former director of the Geological Survey of India believes he has found the ultimate evidence of a 1.7 million-year-old man-made bridge which indicates mankind existed on Earth millions of years ago and had the ability to erect ‘ sophisticated ’ structures long before mainstream experts suggest .
This , however , goes against everything we ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ scientists , humans have been on Earth roughly 200,000 years , but the alleged bridge throws everything that scientists believed true into questions .
The structure — which is visible from space — occupies a relatively large area stretching from India to Sri Lanka .
Curiously , ancient Hindu legends suggest that King Rama , a Hindu deity built a bridge of similar proportions more than a million years ago .
According to the Hindu tradition , this “ strip of land ” is a bridge built by Hindu god Rama , as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Rama is one of the most famous manifestations of the Supreme God and is recognized as the image , the spirit , and consciousness of Hinduism , one of the oldest religions in the world .
In fact , since ancient times it is known as the “ Bridge of Rama ” or “ Rama Setu ” .
The Indian epic Ramayana tells the story of the land bridge and how it was built to serve Hindu god Rama , in order to help him cross the water to reach the large island @ @ @ @ @ @ @ clutches of the demon king Ravanna .
It is a story of love , brave deeds and incredible constructions as it seems .
Some refer to the alleged bridge as the Rama Setu , while others call it Adams Bridge and many believe it is one of the best pieces of evidence that humans have existed on Earth much longer than we ’ re told .
Ok , that ’ s cool but… who ’ s the supposed scientist who said it ’ s real ?
We are talking about Dr. S. Badrinarayanan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of India and former coordinator of the survey division of the National Institute of Ocean Technology ( NIOT ) .
He studied core samples of the bridge and is apparently convinced that we ’ re not looking at a natural formation — as other scientists suggest — but at a man-made structure , and one that was ‘ erected ’ more than a million years ago .
According to reports , Dr. Badrinarayanan performed a survey of this structure and concluded that it was man-made .
Dr. Badrinarayanan and his team drilled 10 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s Bridge .
What he discovered was startling .
About 6 meters below the surface he found a consistent layer of calcareous sand stone , corals and boulder like materials .
His team was surprised when they discovered a layer of loose sand , some 4-5 meters further down and then hard rock formations below that .
A team of divers went down to physically examine the bridge .
The boulders that they observed were not composed of a typical marine formation .
They were identified as having come from either side @ @ @ @ @ @ @ indicates that there is evidence of ancient quarrying in these areas .
His team concluded that materials from either shore were placed upon the sandy bottom of the water to form the causeway .
In a special discussion board on Rediff , Dr. Badrinarayanan said : “ It is not a natural formation ; the top portion of it appears to be a man-made structure.
” “ To understand what I am saying from the geological point of view , you have to get to know several things.
” “ What is known @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a natural grade divide separating the Bay of Bengal and the Indian Ocean to the south .
So , the geological aspects are different on either side.
” “ We found marine sands on top and below that was a mixed assemblage of corals , calcareous sand stones , and boulder-like materials .
“ Surprisingly below that up to 4–5 meters [ 13–16 feet ] , again we found loose sand and after that , hard formations were there.
” He added that “ below the corals and boulders , we are getting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not natural.
” However , the “ Ramayana , ” the bridge is said to have been built upon a wooden foundation ( which was placed atop a preexisting natural elevation ) that was then covered with large and small stones .
But obviously , there are many who disagree with Dr. Badrinarayanan .
One of them is Suvrat Kher , a geologist who specializes in marine formations , who firmly believes we are looking at nothing more than a natural formation .
Writing about the alleged bridge , Dr. Kher said : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ period , glacial buildup and melting forced fluctuations in sea-level by tens of meters , setting up the conditions for several episodes of coral reef and sand shoal formation .
“ During periods of large sea-level drops in the Pleistocene , there would have been a land connection between India and Sri Lanka .
” “ But at the end of the last Wisconsin glaciation , the sea-level began to rise world-wide .
”

A 1.7 million-year-old ‘bridge’ is the ultimate evidence that humans have been on Earth much longer than thought claims expert.
“The ratio of 10:1 (length:width) fits the actual measurements of the bridge observed today.”
The former director of the Geological Survey of India believes he has found the ultimate evidence of a 1.7 million-year-old man-made bridge which indicates mankind existed on Earth millions of years ago and had the ability to erect ‘sophisticated’ structures long before mainstream experts suggest.
This, however, goes against everything we’ve been told since according to mainstream scientists, humans have been on Earth roughly 200,000 years, but the alleged bridge throws everything that scientists believed true into questions.
The structure — which is visible from space — occupies a relatively large area stretching from India to Sri Lanka.
Curiously, ancient Hindu legends suggest that King Rama, a Hindu deity built a bridge of similar proportions more than a million years ago.
According to the Hindu tradition, this “strip of land” is a bridge built by Hindu god Rama, as told in the Hindu epic Ramayana.
Rama is one of the most famous manifestations of the Supreme God and is recognized as the image, the spirit, and consciousness of Hinduism, one of the oldest religions in the world.
In fact, since ancient times it is known as the “Bridge of Rama” or “Rama Setu”.
The Indian epic Ramayana tells the story of the land bridge and how it was built to serve Hindu god Rama, in order to help him cross the water to reach the large island and rescue his beloved one from the clutches of the demon king Ravanna.
It is a story of love, brave deeds and incredible constructions as it seems.
Some refer to the alleged bridge as the Rama Setu, while others call it Adams Bridge and many believe it is one of the best pieces of evidence that humans have existed on Earth much longer than we’re told.
Ok, that’s cool but… who’s the supposed scientist who said it’s real?
We are talking about Dr. S. Badrinarayanan, former director of the Geological Survey of India and former coordinator of the survey division of the National Institute of Ocean Technology (NIOT).
He studied core samples of the bridge and is apparently convinced that we’re not looking at a natural formation — as other scientists suggest — but at a man-made structure, and one that was ‘erected’ more than a million years ago.
According to reports, Dr. Badrinarayanan performed a survey of this structure and concluded that it was man-made. Dr. Badrinarayanan and his team drilled 10 bore holes along the alignment of Adam’s Bridge.
What he discovered was startling. About 6 meters below the surface he found a consistent layer of calcareous sand stone, corals and boulder like materials.
His team was surprised when they discovered a layer of loose sand, some 4-5 meters further down and then hard rock formations below that.
A team of divers went down to physically examine the bridge. The boulders that they observed were not composed of a typical marine formation. They were identified as having come from either side of the causeway.
Dr. Badrinarayanan also indicates that there is evidence of ancient quarrying in these areas. His team concluded that materials from either shore were placed upon the sandy bottom of the water to form the causeway.
In a special discussion board on Rediff, Dr. Badrinarayanan said:
“It is not a natural formation; the top portion of it appears to be a man-made structure.”
“To understand what I am saying from the geological point of view, you have to get to know several things.”
“What is known as Adam’s Bridge is originally a natural grade divide separating the Bay of Bengal and the Indian Ocean to the south. So, the geological aspects are different on either side.”
Dr. Badrinarayanan added:
“We found marine sands on top and below that was a mixed assemblage of corals, calcareous sand stones, and boulder-like materials.
“Surprisingly below that up to 4–5 meters [13–16 feet], again we found loose sand and after that, hard formations were there.”
He added that “below the corals and boulders, we are getting loose sand, which means it is not natural.”
However, the “Ramayana,” the bridge is said to have been built upon a wooden foundation (which was placed atop a preexisting natural elevation) that was then covered with large and small stones.
But obviously, there are many who disagree with Dr. Badrinarayanan.
One of them is Suvrat Kher, a geologist who specializes in marine formations, who firmly believes we are looking at nothing more than a natural formation.
Writing about the alleged bridge, Dr. Kher said:
“During the Pleistocene ‘ice-age’ period, glacial buildup and melting forced fluctuations in sea-level by tens of meters, setting up the conditions for several episodes of coral reef and sand shoal formation.
“During periods of large sea-level drops in the Pleistocene, there would have been a land connection between India and Sri Lanka. ”
“But at the end of the last Wisconsin glaciation, the sea-level began to rise world-wide.”
Source and references: Ancient-code.com / Rediff Magazine; Dr. Kher Blogspot


humansarefree--2020-12-13--The Study the CDC Refused to Do: Vaccinated Vs. Unvaccinated

COVID-19 has reignited the vaccine debate worldwide as significant portions of the population express their unwillingness or hesitancy to take the experimental vaccine .
A vaccine that was developed in record time with rolled back regulations , limited oversight , as well as a limited scope in the safety trials .
The vaccine manufacturers conducting the trials carefully screened potential volunteers , and carefully selected candidates to help them ensure a passing grade for government regulators and then mass distribution .
In this interview , Spiro is joined by Dr. James Lyons-Weiler who recently co-authored a study comparing vaccinated and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has refused to perform despite four different congressional bills which would have obligated them to conduct .
All four bills failed .
The fact that all four bills failed may not come as a surprise , considering Big Pharma is the largest lobby in DC .
But the key findings of the study , may indeed surprise you .
The study was independently conducted , peer reviewed and publicly funded .
Source : YouTube.com .
BitChute version is available here as a back-up if the fascists at YouTube take down the above video @

“The Science,” we have been told since March 2020, is the rigorous set of guidelines that must be “followed” with unquestioning obedience in order to reduce the spread, flatten the curve, return to normal, get our freedom back, end the lockdowns, or any other arbitrary carrot placed on the stick (yes they literally said this) that is wielded by the tyrant class.
If you don’t follow said “The Science” you are a science denying buffoon who wants grandma to die, doesn’t care about the children, are an alt-right Trump humper, a white supremacist, extremist, and most likely a domestic terrorist.
“Don’t wear a mask!” “Wear a mask!” “Wear two masks!” Wear three masks!” “Cloth masks don’t work!” “Only N95s will protect you!”
“If you’re vaccinated you can’t get covid.” “Vaccines are 100% effective at stopping covid.” “Vaccines are 96% effective.”
“Vaccines are 70% effective.” “Vaccines no longer effective after six months.” “Boosters are our only way out of covid.” “It is a pandemic of the unvaccinated.” “You now need a fourth booster!”
“The Science,” as our readers know has been a shifting goal post since day one and has had almost nothing to do with actual science at all. When the pro-mandate psychopaths changed an arbitrary dictate, we are told that the virus has changed, not “The Science.”
One thing about science and data, however, is that it is very difficult to hide the truth because unlike politicians and corrupt “experts,” the numbers do not lie. Recent findings, according to research published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, show that more people under the age of 65 died from alcohol-related causes than of covid.
All thanks to “The Science(TM).”
Approximately 74,408 Americans ages 16 to 64 died of alcohol-related causes, compared to 74,075 individuals under 65 who died of COVID, according to the data. What’s more, the second number continues to decrease as the CDC and others actually examine “with and from covid” deaths and adjust the final count.
As the NY Times reports, during the pandemic, binge drinking increased, as did emergency room visits for alcohol withdrawal. But the new report found that the number of alcohol-related deaths, including from liver disease and accidents, soared, rising to 99,017 in 2020, up from 78,927 the previous year — an increase of 25 percent in the number of deaths in one year.
“The assumption is that there were lots of people who were in recovery and had reduced access to support that spring and relapsed,” said Aaron White, the report’s first author and a senior scientific adviser at the alcohol abuse institute.
“Stress is the primary factor in relapse, and there is no question there was a big increase in self-reported stress, and big increases in anxiety and depression, and planet-wide uncertainty about what was coming next,” he said. “That’s a lot of pressure on people who are trying to maintain recovery.”
While stress from the pandemic was certainly demanding, the government and media’s amplification of it was far greater. Couple the 24/7 constant fear mongering from the media with the unscientific lockdowns by the state which put millions of people out of work and the establishment created the perfect storm.
As the media and government attempt to claim this is some new phenomenon, the record will show that there was an entire body of science pointing these things out as they were unfolding in real time. Sadly, however, those doctors and scientists were banned from social media, had their licenses revoked, and were silenced into oblivion as the problem they tried to stop, got worse.
The Free Thought Project was reporting on this since the beginning in regard to overdoses which soared to historically deadly rates. In 2020, as California was shutting down outdoor parks and outlawed outdoor kissing, residents turned to drugs and alcohol to cope with their new tyrannical world. By December 2020, 360 percent more people had died from overdose than died from covid.
It wasn’t just California either. a year later, we would find that the number one killer of all Americans aged 18-45 was not covid-19 but overdose.
Perhaps the worst part about this was that it was mostly preventable — had the authoritarians not seized control of the narrative and shut down all discussion other than their own.
Recall how they MOCKED us? 1) Government scientist Prof Scally believed it was “STUPID” to question if lockdown saved lives – 31 Oct 2020:https://t.co/wmYJD2vB9K 2) Media now: “lockdown didn’t prevent people dying..MISTAKE ON A GLOBAL SCALE” 26 Mar 2022https://t.co/XhUXrjWgFr pic.twitter.com/oqYLRwQUH7 — Maajid أبو عمّار (@MaajidNawaz) March 28, 2022
It’s not just alcohol and overdoses either. Have we forgotten that politicians, all claiming to “follow the science,” locked us down, destroyed the economy, decimated the middle class through inflation, forcibly medicated us, and muzzled our children over the last two years?
Where is the accountability for the folks who advocated these things? Are we to forget about the two weeks to flatten the curve that turned into rampant police brutality for non-compliance, tens of thousands of closed businesses, jjab passports, and record child suicides?
As the lockdown tyrants slowly shift their narrative in an overt attempt to move from the wrong side of history to the right side, we must remind them that it is too late. They are no longer relevant and their censorship, quack science, and tyranny will never be forgotten.
Says the woman who advocated masking children, closing schools, and arresting the unvaccinated. We remember, Dr. Wen. You can pretend to be on our rational side now, but your previous actions facilitated the suffering of millions for two years. This, we will never forget. — Matt Agorist (@MattAgorist) March 23, 2022
By Matt Agorist, TheFreeThoughtProject.com


humansarefree--2020-12-13--Ex-Pharmaceutical Rep Brandy Vaughan Found Dead After Warning People to Investigate Her Death

For anybody who ’ s looked into the Remote Viewing programs that were ( and probably still are ) in operation within several governments around the world , it ’ s very easy to become awe struck with regards to the validity of these programs , despite the fact that they ’ ve received a lot of criticism from skeptics .
One merely has to look at the facts to get a good picture of just how successful , accurate , and useful these programs were , and again , probably still are .
Here is a great quote from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Department of Statistics at the University of California , Irvine and a professor there since 2008 .
“ What convinced me was just the evidence , the accumulating evidence as I worked in this field and I got to see more and more of the evidence .
“ I visited the laboratories , even beyond where I was working to see what they were doing and I could see that they had really tight controls… and so I got convinced by the good science that I saw being done .
And in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I ’ ve consulted in a lot of different areas of science ; the methodology and the controls on these experiments are tighter than any other area of science where I ’ ve worked.
” ( source ) Such an eye opening and revealing quote , and a fact that needs to be emphasized because when it comes to remote viewing , it conflicts with so many people ’ s belief systems , including many within the fields of academia .
Thus , it is often brushed off as ‘ pseudoscience ’ without @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is odd , given the fact that multiple governments have admitted to studying remote viewing , and other phenomena that falls under the umbrella of parapsychology .
What is remote viewing ?
It ’ s an ability that allows the ‘ viewer ’ to be able to describe a remote geographical location up to several hundred thousand kilometres away ( even more ) from their physical location — one that they have never been to .
Here ’ s another great quote from the declassified literature in 1995 from the Central Intelligence Agency @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and co-founder of Stanford ’ s remote viewing program , Harold E. Puthoff : “ To summarize , over the years , the back-and-forth criticism of protocols , refinement of methods , and successful replication of this type of remote viewing in independent laboratories has yielded considerable scientific evidence for the reality of the [ remote viewing ] phenomenon .
“ Adding to the strength of these results was the discovery that a growing number of individuals could be found to demonstrate high-quality remote viewing , often to their own surprise… “ The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ evolved to the point where visiting CIA personnel with no previous exposure to such concepts have performed well under controlled laboratory conditions.
” ( source ) Multiple viewers were used with exceptional skills inside of this program , which was known as the STARGATE program .
One of them was Lyn Buchanan , a veteran and an Army Remote viewer who worked inside of the program .
His status within the program has been verified by the declassified literature that was released on the program in 1995 .
Here is an example within @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , I chose this one because it also mentions the professor I quoted above , Jessica Utts .
The document mentions Utts ’ responsibility with regards to conducting a review of the remote viewing research .
It also mentions a program that aired featuring many people from within the program , like Lyn Buchanan , but obviously does not mention all of them as there were many .
One common theme among several army remote viewers , like Ingo Swann and Pat Price , names that are also found throughout the de-classified STARGATE @ @ @ @ @ @ @ came across an interview with Lyn Buchanan , and according to him : “ After the military I was asked by a branch of the government to do a paper , a study paper to compare and contrast ET psychic ability to human psychic ability .
“ The study that I did was because I was given access to many of the things that never made it into project grudge or the blue book or anything like that because they couldn ’ t be denied .
“ So anyway , in studying these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ take the ET ’ s of all different kinds and species and all that and put them into four main categories .
We ’ ve got those who are more psychic than us and those that are less psychic than us .
“ In each of those two categories we ’ ve got friendly to us and unfriendly to us , the unfriendly non-psychic ones tend to not come here .
They don ’ t like us , they don ’ t want to be around us .
The non-psychic friendly ones come @ @ @ @ @ @ @ friendly ones actually want to help us develop our abilities and become stronger at it .
And the unfriendly psychic ones want us wiped off the planet , they want us dead , period , no questions asked.
” He also mentions extraterrestrial bases that are on Earth , and he says there are approximately five .
He mentions that they are all inside of mountains and that at some of these bases humans are working with these extraterrestrials in various ways .
He is not the only viewer to mention these bases @ @ @ @ @ @ @ many fascinating stories in his book , Penetration : The Question of Extraterrestrial and Human Telepathy .
Furthermore , Joseph Mcmoneagle was another individual who had experience in remote viewing an extraterrestrial presence .
Then , there is Pat Price , who , along with Ingo Swann , is described as one of SRI ’ s most successful viewers , as his sessions were extremely accurate .
Legendary UFO researcher Timothy Good tells the story quite well in his book , Unearthly Disclosure : According to Captain Frederick H. Atwater , a retired @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time in highly classified ‘ remote viewing ’ experiments for the CIA and the Defense Intelligence Agency , as well as for the Army ’ s Intelligence and Security Command , Price had remotely viewed four alien bases on Earth , one of which was located under Mount Ziel , Northern Territory .
Mount Ziel lies some 80 miles west-northwest of Pine Gap .
Price believed the base contained a mixture of ‘ personnel ’ from the other bases , one purpose being to ‘ transport new recruits , with an overall monitoring @ @ @ @ @ @ @ said to be under Mount Perdido in the Pyrenees , Mount Inyangani in Zimbabwe , and , coincidentally , in Alaska under Mount Hayes .
Price described the occupants as ‘ looking like homo sapiens , except for the lungs , heart , blood and eyes.
’ Lord Admiral Hill-Norton , Former Chief of Defence Staff , 5 Star Admiral of the Royal Navy , and Chairman of the NATO military committee , wrote the forward to the book by Good .
Here ’ s a great quote from him : “ There @ @ @ @ @ @ @ technically miles in advance of anything we can deploy , that we have no means of stopping them coming here … [ and ] that there is a serious possibility that we are being visited and have been visited for many years by people from outer space , from other civilizations .
“ That it behooves us , in case some of these people in the future or now should turn hostile , to find out who they are , where they come from , and what they want .
This should be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not the subject of ‘ rubishing ’ by tabloid newspapers.
” ( source ) Bellow is a screenshot of the first page of a document from 1979 , which wasn ’ t approved for release until after the year 2000 .
The document is written by Atwater , and you can scroll down to the bottom and see that yourself .
I thought I should post it here because it mentions Price and it ’ s very interesting , although you can ’ t make out all of it because some is blanked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ how useful Mr. Price was to the CIA , and how interesting findings were not shared .
His story regarding the alien bases is one example of many that corroborates other stories from many viewers like Buchanan and Ingo Swan ( both of whom were mentioned above ) .
They ’ re also mentioned on the second page of the document below .
If you pay a visit to the CIA ’ s electronic reading room and type in any of the names I ’ ve mentioned in this article , you will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a UFO researcher for a very long time , what ’ s interesting to me is that the comments remote viewers make about ET presence corroborates with a lot of other information in the field .
The success of the remote viewing alone is why it ’ s even more intriguing .
Human ability and capability expands far beyond what is presently known .
There are concepts regarding our reality and facts about the human experience that are still being revealed .
We are literally living in apocalyptic times .
‘ Apocalypse ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ meaning ‘ revelation , ’ ” an unveiling or unfolding of things not previously known and which could not be known apart from the unveiling.
’ ( source ) In today ’ s day and age , no matter how much evidence and empirical data supports a phenomenon , and no matter how obvious it may seem , if it conflicts with long held collective belief systems , it will always be rejected simply based on the implications it could have .
This process of revelation is happening now , and although it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has been accelerating .
We are living in very exciting times .

For anybody who’s looked into the Remote Viewing programs that were (and probably still are) in operation within several governments around the world, it’s very easy to become awe struck with regards to the validity of these programs, despite the fact that they’ve received a lot of criticism from skeptics.
One merely has to look at the facts to get a good picture of just how successful, accurate, and useful these programs were, and again, probably still are.
Here is a great quote from Dr. Jessica Utts, the Chair of the Department of Statistics at the University of California, Irvine and a professor there since 2008.
“What convinced me was just the evidence, the accumulating evidence as I worked in this field and I got to see more and more of the evidence.
“I visited the laboratories, even beyond where I was working to see what they were doing and I could see that they had really tight controls… and so I got convinced by the good science that I saw being done. And in fact I will say as a statistician I’ve consulted in a lot of different areas of science; the methodology and the controls on these experiments are tighter than any other area of science where I’ve worked.” (source)
Such an eye opening and revealing quote, and a fact that needs to be emphasized because when it comes to remote viewing, it conflicts with so many people’s belief systems, including many within the fields of academia.
Thus, it is often brushed off as ‘pseudoscience’ without any proper investigation or inquiry. This is odd, given the fact that multiple governments have admitted to studying remote viewing, and other phenomena that falls under the umbrella of parapsychology.
What is remote viewing? It’s an ability that allows the ‘viewer’ to be able to describe a remote geographical location up to several hundred thousand kilometres away (even more) from their physical location — one that they have never been to.
Here’s another great quote from the declassified literature in 1995 from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) archives, from scientist and co-founder of Stanford’s remote viewing program, Harold E. Puthoff:
“To summarize, over the years, the back-and-forth criticism of protocols, refinement of methods, and successful replication of this type of remote viewing in independent laboratories has yielded considerable scientific evidence for the reality of the [remote viewing] phenomenon.
“Adding to the strength of these results was the discovery that a growing number of individuals could be found to demonstrate high-quality remote viewing, often to their own surprise…
“The development of this capability at SRI has evolved to the point where visiting CIA personnel with no previous exposure to such concepts have performed well under controlled laboratory conditions.” (source)
Multiple viewers were used with exceptional skills inside of this program, which was known as the STARGATE program. One of them was Lyn Buchanan, a veteran and an Army Remote viewer who worked inside of the program.
His status within the program has been verified by the declassified literature that was released on the program in 1995.
Here is an example within the literature. Although there are many, I chose this one because it also mentions the professor I quoted above, Jessica Utts.
The document mentions Utts’ responsibility with regards to conducting a review of the remote viewing research.
It also mentions a program that aired featuring many people from within the program, like Lyn Buchanan, but obviously does not mention all of them as there were many.
One common theme among several army remote viewers, like Ingo Swann and Pat Price, names that are also found throughout the de-classified STARGATE literature, is extraterrestrial.
I recently came across an interview with Lyn Buchanan, and according to him:
“After the military I was asked by a branch of the government to do a paper, a study paper to compare and contrast ET psychic ability to human psychic ability.
“The study that I did was because I was given access to many of the things that never made it into project grudge or the blue book or anything like that because they couldn’t be denied.
“So anyway, in studying these, I found out that we can take the ET’s of all different kinds and species and all that and put them into four main categories. We’ve got those who are more psychic than us and those that are less psychic than us.
“In each of those two categories we’ve got friendly to us and unfriendly to us, the unfriendly non-psychic ones tend to not come here. They don’t like us, they don’t want to be around us. The non-psychic friendly ones come here for trade.
“The psychic friendly ones actually want to help us develop our abilities and become stronger at it. And the unfriendly psychic ones want us wiped off the planet, they want us dead, period, no questions asked.”
He also mentions extraterrestrial bases that are on Earth, and he says there are approximately five. He mentions that they are all inside of mountains and that at some of these bases humans are working with these extraterrestrials in various ways.
He is not the only viewer to mention these bases and extraterrestrials, as Ingo Swann told many fascinating stories in his book, Penetration: The Question of Extraterrestrial and Human Telepathy.
Furthermore, Joseph Mcmoneagle was another individual who had experience in remote viewing an extraterrestrial presence.
Then, there is Pat Price, who, along with Ingo Swann, is described as one of SRI’s most successful viewers, as his sessions were extremely accurate.
Legendary UFO researcher Timothy Good tells the story quite well in his book, Unearthly Disclosure:
According to Captain Frederick H. Atwater, a retired US Army officer also involved at the time in highly classified ‘remote viewing’ experiments for the CIA and the Defense Intelligence Agency, as well as for the Army’s Intelligence and Security Command, Price had remotely viewed four alien bases on Earth, one of which was located under Mount Ziel, Northern Territory.
Mount Ziel lies some 80 miles west-northwest of Pine Gap. Price believed the base contained a mixture of ‘personnel’ from the other bases, one purpose being to ‘transport new recruits, with an overall monitoring function’.
The other bases were said to be under Mount Perdido in the Pyrenees, Mount Inyangani in Zimbabwe, and, coincidentally, in Alaska under Mount Hayes. Price described the occupants as ‘looking like homo sapiens, except for the lungs, heart, blood and eyes.’
Lord Admiral Hill-Norton, Former Chief of Defence Staff, 5 Star Admiral of the Royal Navy, and Chairman of the NATO military committee, wrote the forward to the book by Good. Here’s a great quote from him:
“There are objects in our atmosphere which are technically miles in advance of anything we can deploy, that we have no means of stopping them coming here … [and] that there is a serious possibility that we are being visited and have been visited for many years by people from outer space, from other civilizations.
“That it behooves us, in case some of these people in the future or now should turn hostile, to find out who they are, where they come from, and what they want. This should be the subject of rigorous scientific investigation and not the subject of ‘rubishing’ by tabloid newspapers.” (source)
Bellow is a screenshot of the first page of a document from 1979, which wasn’t approved for release until after the year 2000. The document is written by Atwater, and you can scroll down to the bottom and see that yourself.
I thought I should post it here because it mentions Price and it’s very interesting, although you can’t make out all of it because some is blanked out.
However, you can see how useful Mr. Price was to the CIA, and how interesting findings were not shared.
His story regarding the alien bases is one example of many that corroborates other stories from many viewers like Buchanan and Ingo Swan (both of whom were mentioned above). They’re also mentioned on the second page of the document below.
If you pay a visit to the CIA’s electronic reading room and type in any of the names I’ve mentioned in this article, you will find a plethora of articles.
Being a UFO researcher for a very long time, what’s interesting to me is that the comments remote viewers make about ET presence corroborates with a lot of other information in the field.
The success of the remote viewing alone is why it’s even more intriguing.
The Takeaway
Human ability and capability expands far beyond what is presently known. There are concepts regarding our reality and facts about the human experience that are still being revealed. We are literally living in apocalyptic times.
‘Apocalypse’ (ἀποκάλυψις) is a Greek word meaning ‘revelation,’”an unveiling or unfolding of things not previously known and which could not be known apart from the unveiling.’ (source)
In today’s day and age, no matter how much evidence and empirical data supports a phenomenon, and no matter how obvious it may seem, if it conflicts with long held collective belief systems, it will always be rejected simply based on the implications it could have.
This process of revelation is happening now, and although it’s slow and gradual, it has been accelerating.
We are living in very exciting times.
Source: Collective-Evolution.com


humansarefree--2020-12-14--Where is the Pandemic? Total Deaths in 2020 Are NO DIFFERENT Than Prior Years

A couple weeks ago a study at John ’ s Hopkins University was taken down because it showed that total deaths in the US in 2020 were no different than prior years .
Today , another expert shares the same .
We reported in late November how an article in a newsletter published at Johns Hopkins University showed that total deaths in the US have not increased dramatically in 2020 when compared to prior years .
This article was taken down .
The university could not let it stand : We were provided more on this unfortunate situation after we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The university claimed that the study they took down should be considered with what the WHO and the CDC say on the matter .
We didn ’ t buy this because we learned in early March that the data from the WHO was garbage .
But we also know that the CDC has not been forthcoming with their reporting on COVID either : We also reported on our own study in July where we reported basically the same thing .
Overall deaths are no worse in 2020 than they were in prior @ @ @ @ @ @ @ US and across the world use various standards in determining if a death should be considered a coronavirus death , these numbers could not be trusted , even in the US .
Therefore we believe that the only measurement we can use to really see the impact of COVID is overall deaths .
This is because we really have no faith in what deaths are classified as COVID due to issues with the classification process .
So , by looking at overall deaths , we see that mortality is not any higher than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ provides the same support that Big Media , Big Tech and Big Pharma don ’ t want you to know : Deaths in the USA over the years… Where is the massive spike ?
Again , there is data that indicates that COVID is not as terrible as China and the US medical professionals would like us to think .
This is why this report at Johns Hopkins had to be taken down .
It has nothing to do with the truth and everything to do with the message .
What ever happened @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?

A couple weeks ago a study at John’s Hopkins University was taken down because it showed that total deaths in the US in 2020 were no different than prior years.
Today, another expert shares the same.
We reported in late November how an article in a newsletter published at Johns Hopkins University showed that total deaths in the US have not increased dramatically in 2020 when compared to prior years.
This article was taken down. The university could not let it stand: Johns Hopkins Takes Down Study Showing US Deaths In 2020 No Different Than Prior Years – It Doesn’t Fit Their ‘We’re All Gonna Die’ Narrative.
We were provided more on this unfortunate situation after we reported on the actions at Johns Hopkins. The university claimed that the study they took down should be considered with what the WHO and the CDC say on the matter.
We didn’t buy this because we learned in early March that the data from the WHO was garbage.
But we also know that the CDC has not been forthcoming with their reporting on COVID either: CDC Quietly Updated COVID-19 Numbers – Only 9,210 Americans Died From It Alone.
We also reported on our own study in July where we reported basically the same thing. Overall deaths are no worse in 2020 than they were in prior years.

Because the authorities in the US and across the world use various standards in determining if a death should be considered a coronavirus death, these numbers could not be trusted, even in the US.
Therefore we believe that the only measurement we can use to really see the impact of COVID is overall deaths. This is because we really have no faith in what deaths are classified as COVID due to issues with the classification process. So, by looking at overall deaths, we see that mortality is not any higher than prior years.
Today, another source provides the same support that Big Media, Big Tech and Big Pharma don’t want you to know:
Dr. David Samadi, MD tweeted:
Deaths in the USA over the years…
2010: 2.5M
2011: 2.5M
2012: 2.5M
2013 :2.6M
2014: 2.6M
2015: 2.7M
2016: 2.7M
2017: 2.8M
2018: 2.8M
2019: 2.9M
2020: 2.5M (as of November)
Where is the massive spike?
Deaths in the USA over the years… 2010: 2.5M
2011: 2.5M
2012: 2.5M
2013 :2.6M
2014: 2.6M
2015: 2.7M
2016: 2.7M
2017: 2.8M
2018: 2.8M
2019: 2.9M
2020: 2.5M (as of November) Where is the massive spike? (h/t @MillerStream) — Dr. David Samadi, MD (@drdavidsamadi) December 13, 2020
Statistics and sources below:
Again, there is data that indicates that COVID is not as terrible as China and the US medical professionals would like us to think. This is why this report at Johns Hopkins had to be taken down. It has nothing to do with the truth and everything to do with the message.
What ever happened to just studying and reporting the truth?
By Joe Hoft, Guest writer


humansarefree--2020-12-14--Bill Gates: ‘America First’ is an Extreme Idea and Lockdowns Should Continue Into 2022, With Bars an

Bill Gates: ‘America First’ is an Extreme Idea and Lockdowns Should Continue Into 2022, With Bars and Restaurants Closed for the Next 4-6 Months

This guy gets creepier by the day .
Bill Gates joined Jake Tapper on CNN on Sunday to discuss vaccinating the world .
During the discussion Gates said Trump ’ s “ America First ” policy of vaccinating US citizens first is an “ extreme idea.
” Melinda Gates also stated on CNN that she is “ incredibly disappointed ” that President Trump ’ s executive order is giving Americans ( the ones who are basically paying for the research ) priority in access to COVID vaccines .
You can read that report HERE .
Gates went on to say @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with no bars or restaurants opening for the next six months .
In case you ’ re wondering what the heck is Gates finding so amusing about his idea of locking up the world until 2022 ( something that will cause millions of deaths , mass poverty and sufferance ) , then you should also watch him laugh and giggle when speaking about vaccines and mass death : Watch Bill Gates Laughing While Saying ‘ We Take GMO Organisms & Shoot Them Right Into Little Kids Veins ’ : This guy is seriously @ @

This guy gets creepier by the day.
Billy Boy joined Jake Tapper on CNN on Sunday to discuss jjabing the world.
During the discussion Gates said Trump’s “America First” policy of jjabing US citizens first is an “extreme idea.”
Melinda Gates also stated on CNN that she is “incredibly disappointed” that President Trump’s executive order is giving Americans (the ones who are basically paying for the research) priority in access to COVID jjabs. You can read that report HERE.
Gates went on to say the lockdowns should continue into 2022, with no bars or restaurants opening for the next six months.
.@BillGates on Covid: "Even through 2022” we should be prepared for life to not return to “normal” Says “sadly" it’s "appropriate” for bars and restaurants to close over the next "four to six months" pic.twitter.com/cmDD8pv3XR — Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) December 13, 2020
In case you’re wondering what the heck is Gates finding so amusing about his idea of locking up the world until 2022 (something that will cause millions of deaths, mass poverty and sufferance), then you should also watch him laugh and giggle when speaking about jjabs and mass death:
Watch Billy Boy Laughing While Saying ‘We Take GMO Organisms & Shoot Them Right Into Little Kids Veins’:
This guy is seriously deranged!
Reference: Thegatewaypundit.com