humansarefree--2020-12-23--Archive of 4,000 Documents Reveals Government Knew Decades Ago About Health Impact of Wireless Techn

Archive of 4,000 Documents Reveals Government Knew Decades Ago About Health Impact of Wireless Technology

Researcher Zorach Glaser , Ph.D. spent decades archiving studies that examine the link between certain health issues and exposure to microwave and radio frequencies .
Scholars and the public are now invited to help review Glaser ’ s documents .
Zorach ( Zory ) Glaser Ph.D. , LT , MSC , USNR , is one of the most important scientists to study the impact of wireless technology on human health .
His career as a government research scientist spans decades working for the U.S. Navy , the U.S. Public Health Service , the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Drug Administration ’ s Bureau of Radiological Health .
Glaser ’ s extensive archive of nearly 4,000 documents , now available to the public , provides clear evidence that the harmful effects of wireless were known long before cell phones and wireless technology were commercialized in the early 1980s .
The archive materials reveal that the U.S. government , particularly the military , knew for decades of the harm wireless technology can cause to human health .
During World War II , the U.S. military started to use radar , and the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Soldiers working with these systems , which use radio and microwave frequencies — the same frequencies used for wireless devices such as cell phones and Wi-Fi — began to complain of adverse health effects from exposure to the radiation emitted by these systems .
At the time , the illness experienced by these soldiers was referred to as “ Radiation Sickness /Microwave Sickness.
” Glaser was assigned by the U.S. Navy ’ s Naval Medical Research Center to investigate .
He spent about a decade collecting every study conducted within and outside @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from radio frequencies ( RFs ) and microwave frequencies may cause adverse health effects .
Dr. Glaser ’ s report , “ Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena ( “ Effects ” ) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio-Frequency Radiation , ” was published in 1971 .
The report references more than 2,300 studies showing multiple adverse biological responses to radio- and microwave-frequency radiation .
Pages 5-12 of the report ’ s bibliography list these adverse effects , including damage to vital organs and other tissues and the central nervous system , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vascular disorders , metabolic and gastrointestinal disorders , and endocrine and histological changes .
At that time , it was mostly only military personnel who were exposed to high levels of microwaves and RF radiation and who developed Microwave/ Radiation Sickness .
But today , the whole population is exposed to levels of radiation which are millions and sometimes billions of times higher than they were when Glaser started his work a few decades ago .
The “ Microwave Sickness ” symptoms suffered then by the military personnel are now widely seen among @ @ @ @ @ @ @ population who are exposed to this electro-smog pollution from wireless devices .
The sickness , also referred to as electro-sensitivity , is estimated to affect 10 % of the general population .
Glasers ’ studies and reports are of the utmost importance and relevance to existing harms from current wireless technology , including 5G , cell towers , Wi-Fi and cell phones which use the same type of frequencies and intensities as those studied by Glaser .
For this reason Glaser ’ s reports have been crucial in supporting advocacy efforts and letting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government and telecom say , there is more than ample evidence of harm from these exposures .
A few years ago , when Glaser realized the importance of his archives , he donated them to Dr. Magda Havas , Ph.D. of Trent University in Canada .
Havas , an associate professor of environmental and resource studies , has worked for more than a decade to expose the harms of wireless technology .
According to Havas , Glaser ’ s archive contains quite a few “ gems.
” “ Zory was a packrat ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Havas said .
“ I found one paper that was circulated to only nine people with health recommendations that were ignored.
” To make these important documents available to the public , Havas and her team have worked for years to scan all the documents and make them searchable .
So far Havas ’ team has scanned 20 out of the 25 boxes of Glaser ’ s archives .
Because of the archive ’ s magnitude , the public is invited to help review the documents .
Scholars who are interested are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the more useful and relevant finds and post those overviews on Zory ’ s website .
People who find important information are asked to let Havas know .
If you are interested in participating in this project , please contact Dr. Magda Havas ( [ email protected ] ) with a subject heading of “ Zory ’ s Archive .
”

Researcher Zorach Glaser, Ph.D. spent decades archiving studies that examine the link between certain health issues and exposure to microwave and radio frequencies. Scholars and the public are now invited to help review Glaser’s documents.
By Dafna Tachover, Esq, ChildrensHealthDefense.org
Zorach (Zory) Glaser Ph.D., LT, MSC, USNR, is one of the most important scientists to study the impact of wireless technology on human health.
His career as a government research scientist spans decades working for the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Public Health Service, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Bureau of Radiological Health.
Glaser’s extensive archive of nearly 4,000 documents, now available to the public, provides clear evidence that the harmful effects of wireless were known long before cell phones and wireless technology were commercialized in the early 1980s.
The archive materials reveal that the U.S. government, particularly the military, knew for decades of the harm wireless technology can cause to human health.
During World War II, the U.S. military started to use radar, and the use of radio telecommunications systems was growing.
Soldiers working with these systems, which use radio and microwave frequencies — the same frequencies used for wireless devices such as cell phones and Wi-Fi — began to complain of adverse health effects from exposure to the radiation emitted by these systems.
At the time, the illness experienced by these soldiers was referred to as “Radiation Sickness /Microwave Sickness.”
Glaser was assigned by the U.S. Navy’s Naval Medical Research Center to investigate.
He spent about a decade collecting every study conducted within and outside the U.S. showing that the radiation emitted from radio frequencies (RFs) and microwave frequencies may cause adverse health effects.
Dr. Glaser’s report, “Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (“Effects”) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio-Frequency Radiation,” was published in 1971.
The report references more than 2,300 studies showing multiple adverse biological responses to radio- and microwave-frequency radiation.
Pages 5-12 of the report’s bibliography list these adverse effects, including damage to vital organs and other tissues and the central nervous system, physiological and psychological effects, blood and vascular disorders, metabolic and gastrointestinal disorders, and endocrine and histological changes.
Glaser’s 1976 updated report includes 3,700 studies which confirm the soldiers’ complaints.
At that time, it was mostly only military personnel who were exposed to high levels of microwaves and RF radiation and who developed Microwave/ Radiation Sickness.
But today, the whole population is exposed to levels of radiation which are millions and sometimes billions of times higher than they were when Glaser started his work a few decades ago.
The “Microwave Sickness” symptoms suffered then by the military personnel are now widely seen among growing numbers of people in the general population who are exposed to this electro-smog pollution from wireless devices. The sickness, also referred to as electro-sensitivity, is estimated to affect 10% of the general population.
Glasers’ studies and reports are of the utmost importance and relevance to existing harms from current wireless technology, including 5G, cell towers, Wi-Fi and cell phones which use the same type of frequencies and intensities as those studied by Glaser.
For this reason Glaser’s reports have been crucial in supporting advocacy efforts and letting the public know that despite what the government and telecom say, there is more than ample evidence of harm from these exposures.
A few years ago, when Glaser realized the importance of his archives, he donated them to Dr. Magda Havas, Ph.D. of Trent University in Canada.
Havas, an associate professor of environmental and resource studies, has worked for more than a decade to expose the harms of wireless technology.
According to Havas, Glaser’s archive contains quite a few “gems.” “Zory was a packrat (his words) and he kept everything, Havas said.
“I found one paper that was circulated to only nine people with health recommendations that were ignored.”
To make these important documents available to the public, Havas and her team have worked for years to scan all the documents and make them searchable.
So far Havas’ team has scanned 20 out of the 25 boxes of Glaser’s archives.
Because of the archive’s magnitude, the public is invited to help review the documents.
Scholars who are interested are invited to write short overviews of some of the more useful and relevant finds and post those overviews on Zory’s website.
People who find important information are asked to let Havas know.
If you are interested in participating in this project, please contact Dr. Magda Havas (drm[email protected]) with a subject heading of “Zory’s Archive.”


humansarefree--2020-12-22--French Law Would Ban People Who Don’t Get COVID Vaccine From Using Public Transport

People in France who refuse to take the COVID-19 vaccine will be banned from using public transport and engaging in other activities under a newly introduced law .
The law , which is set to be submitted to parliament , mandates that citizens have proof of a negative COVID test or “ preventative treatment , including the administration of a vaccine ” in order to “ access transport or to some locations , as well as certain activities.
” The law has sparked “ angry protests from opposition politicians , ” according to AFP .
France ’ s vaccination program @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on Sunday , will not be mandatory , but a whopping 55 % of citizens say they will not get the shot .
“ In a backhanded way , this bill does not aim to make vaccinations mandatory , but will prevent anybody who doesn ’ t comply from having a social life , ” she said .
RN party spokesman Sebastien Chenu called the plan a “ health dictatorship , ” while centrist senator Nathalie Goulet said the draft was “ an attack on public freedoms.
” Guillaume Peltier , deputy leader @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the law would allow the government to “ get all the power to suspend our freedoms without parliamentary control.
” As we previously highlighted , France has imposed some of the strictest lockdown measures in Europe , with citizens having to fill out a form every time they leave their home .

People in France who refuse to take the COVID-19 jjab will be banned from using public transport and engaging in other activities under a newly introduced law.
The law, which is set to be submitted to parliament, mandates that citizens have proof of a negative COVID test or “preventative treatment, including the administration of a jjab” in order to “access transport or to some locations, as well as certain activities.”
The law has sparked “angry protests from opposition politicians,” according to AFP.
France’s vaccination program, which is set to get underway on Sunday, will not be mandatory, but a whopping 55% of citizens say they will not get the shot.
RN leader Marine Le Pen branded the jjab measure “essentially totalitarian.”
“In a backhanded way, this bill does not aim to make vaccinations mandatory, but will prevent anybody who doesn’t comply from having a social life,” she said.
RN party spokesman Sebastien Chenu called the plan a “health dictatorship,” while centrist senator Nathalie Goulet said the draft was “an attack on public freedoms.”
Guillaume Peltier, deputy leader of the center-right LR party, warned that the law would allow the government to “get all the power to suspend our freedoms without parliamentary control.”
As we previously highlighted, France has imposed some of the strictest lockdown measures in Europe, with citizens having to fill out a form every time they leave their home.
Source: Summit.news


humansarefree--2020-12-22--Democrats’ Stimulus Bill Sends Millions to the Communist Venezuela Where Dominion Voting Machines Or

Democrats’ Stimulus Bill Sends Millions to the Communist Venezuela Where Dominion Voting Machines Originated

The Democrats ’ stimulus bill is an outrage .
After working with their Democrat governors and attorneys general around the US to do everything they could to kill the economy so they could make President Trump look bad , they then put together this piece of garbage .
Democrats have done all they can to kill the economy while claiming COVID was going to kill us all .
They shut down small businesses and forced people out of business as a result .
So today they offer relief and the regime in Venezuela comes out better than Americans .
Once @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is that Venezuela makes out in this bill as well in the amount of $ 33 million : Oh and $ 33 mil to the communists in Venezuela .
pic.twitter.com/LfC1IcYXWI So the regime who was involved in the development of the voting machines used steal elections in their country for two decades and in the US this year are given money by the Democrats ?
What an outrage .
The bill is 5,500 pages long and full of money for everyone but the people the Democrats have punished for attempting to run their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the millions for Sudan – of course to Democrats this makes sense being in there – where the hell is all this money going to ?
This was a disgrace .
The Democrats and their allies keep getting more and more outrageous , anti-American , communist and crazy .

The Democrats’ stimulus bill is an outrage. After working with their Democrat governors and attorneys general around the US to do everything they could to kill the economy so they could make President Trump look bad, they then put together this piece of garbage.
Democrats have done all they can to kill the economy while claiming COVID was going to kill us all. They shut down small businesses and forced people out of business as a result.
So today they offer relief and the regime in Venezuela comes out better than Americans.
Once piece from the bill not reported earlier is that Venezuela makes out in this bill as well in the amount of $33 million:
Oh and $33 mil to the communists in Venezuela. pic.twitter.com/LfC1IcYXWI
— Marina Medvin 🇺🇸 (@MarinaMedvin) December 21, 2020
So the regime who was involved in the development of the voting machines used steal elections in their country for two decades and in the US this year are given money by the Democrats? What an outrage.
The bill is 5,500 pages long and full of money for everyone but the people the Democrats have punished for attempting to run their own businesses.
My God – just vote no — Catturd ™ (@catturd2) December 21, 2020
Here is more on the millions for Sudan – of course to Democrats this makes sense being in there – where the hell is all this money going to?
This was a disgrace. The Democrats and their allies keep getting more and more outrageous, anti-American, communist and crazy.
By Joe Hoft, Guest writer


humansarefree--2020-12-24--New Study: Mask Mandates Had Zero Effect in Florida or Nationwide (But the Lie Continues)

Obviously , no amount of evidence , data , trends , facts , studies , or science will ever convince most ‘ public health officials ’ that masks aren ’ t doing squat to stop the spread of COVID-19 .
Cases and deaths continue to spike ( yes , many of these are super-sensitive PCR test-driven numbers , but still ) despite the fact that well over 90 % of the country are complying with their absurd mandates .
Yet , predictably , the virus keeps going right on virusing , as highly contagious respiratory viruses , unfortunately , tend @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hits .
Nevertheless , those of us who are mask skeptics have a difficult chore in front of us .
Given that most of the country is under a mask mandate of some form or another , we can point to spikes all day AFTER these mandates were put in place only to have our opponents simply say , “ Look how bad it would have been WITHOUT masks !
” It ’ s a tough argument to counter given the fact that our overlords have sold masking as a low-cost , easy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worth it even if they “ save one life , ” or something ( nevermind the health risks – let ’ s censor docs who talk about those ! )
.
So , how DO we prove that things wouldn ’ t have been worse without masks ?
One way is to look at data from the few free states remaining .
In Florida , for example , most counties have so far bravely refused to implement mask mandates while others , usually in high population centers , have done so .
Justin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( follow them on Twitter here – it ’ s worth it ) just released a comprehensive data analysis of masked vs non-masked counties in the state .
A total of 22 of 67 counties in the state have implemented a mask order at some point during the period of May 1 through December 15 .
It may not sound like many , but these include almost all of Florida ’ s largest metro areas .
To be more than fair , if an area added a mask order at some point during @ @ @ @ @ @ @ authors gave a 14 day period to allow time for cases to begin subsiding .
“ Cases were summed for both mandate and non-mandate jurisdictions and adjusted per 100,000 people for days the mandates were or were not in effect , ” wrote the authors , describing the methodology used .
If masks did even close to as advertised , one would expect to see the counties that went maskless to be absolute dumpster fires next to the counties that implemented mandates , right ?
At the very least , the numbers should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a percentage point or two .
So , how did it go ?
Yep , it was the Mask Cult ’ s worse nightmare : “ When counties DID have a mandate in effect , there were 667,239 cases over 3,137 days with an average of 23 cases per 100,000 per day .
When counties DID NOT have a countywide order , there were 438,687 cases over 12,139 days with an average of 22 cases per 100,000 per day.
” In other words , counties with mask-mandates in place actually did WORSE than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( Yeah , color me shocked . )
The authors even accounted for population density in their analysis , suggesting that it didn ’ t have an impact on the numbers because four of the 12 most populous counties in Florida never had a countywide order .
“ When the eight DID have an order in effect , there were 64 cases per 1,000 .
In periods 11 of 12 DID NOT have one , there were 40 , ” they wrote .
“ But that ’ s just Florida , ” you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ anyway .
Surely masks have worked in the rest of the country.
” Well , I ’ m glad you asked !
The good folks at Rational Ground went on to compare national numbers , pitting the states that resisted the urge to impose a statewide mask mandate against those that masked up .
How did those compare ?
So there you have it , incontrovertible data evidence that mask mandates do little to nothing to stop or even slightly curb the spread of COVID-19 .
If masks were the answer , wouldn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ drop in cases not long after mask mandates are implemented ?
At the very least , wouldn ’ t you expect to see cases level off and STAY leveled off ?
What you would NOT expect would be what has actually happened , for cases to spike as they have done since November seemingly all across the country , regardless of whether or not a mandatory masking policy was in place .
Further , wouldn ’ t you also expect states and areas that MASKED HARRDERRR than anyone else , states like California @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to insist the plebes under their control mask up outside on hiking trails and sitting alone in parks , to have the lowest case counts of all ?
Just look at the latest per capita numbers there compared to Florida and tell me with a straight face that mask mandates ‘ work.
’ As Dave Rubin adeptly pointed out earlier this month , Florida ’ s numbers “ should be ten times higher ” than California ’ s .
I mean , nobody is asking for masks to work perfectly , but hell @ @ @ @ @ @ @ performance ?
Numbers and data like this get down to the brass tacks .
We can pit our doctors , scientists , and epidemiologists against their doctors , scientists , and epidemiologists on the actual science behind whether forcing people to put a moist , bacteria & virus-laden piece of cloth over the holes through which they breathe actually works to contain a virus that ’ s infinitesimally smaller than its threads ( and yes , there are plenty of doctors , scientists , and epidemiologists on Team Reality too , and a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Twitter list ! )
, but if mask-mandates aren ’ t actually WORKING to curb the spread , why do we have them in place ?
It ’ s complete and utter nonsense , of course .
You know it , I know it , and the powers-that-be likely know it too .
So why do they insist on continuing the charade ?
Whatever it is , it has NOTHING to do with either public health or real science .

Obviously, no amount of evidence, data, trends, facts, studies, or science will ever convince most ‘public health officials’ that masks aren’t doing squat to stop the spread of COVID-19.
Cases and deaths continue to spike (yes, many of these are super-sensitive PCR test-driven numbers, but still) despite the fact that well over 90% of the country are complying with their absurd mandates.
Yet, predictably, the virus keeps going right on virusing, as highly contagious respiratory viruses, unfortunately, tend to do, especially once cold weather hits.
Nevertheless, those of us who are mask skeptics have a difficult chore in front of us. Given that most of the country is under a mask mandate of some form or another, we can point to spikes all day AFTER these mandates were put in place only to have our opponents simply say, “Look how bad it would have been WITHOUT masks!”
It’s a tough argument to counter given the fact that our overlords have sold masking as a low-cost, easy “solution” that’s totally worth it even if they “save one life,” or something (nevermind the health risks – let’s censor docs who talk about those!).
So, how DO we prove that things wouldn’t have been worse without masks? One way is to look at data from the few free states remaining.
In Florida, for example, most counties have so far bravely refused to implement mask mandates while others, usually in high population centers, have done so.
Justin Hart and the team at Rational Ground (follow them on Twitter here – it’s worth it) just released a comprehensive data analysis of masked vs non-masked counties in the state.
A total of 22 of 67 counties in the state have implemented a mask order at some point during the period of May 1 through December 15.
It may not sound like many, but these include almost all of Florida’s largest metro areas. To be more than fair, if an area added a mask order at some point during the outbreak, the study’s authors gave a 14 day period to allow time for cases to begin subsiding.
“Cases were summed for both mandate and non-mandate jurisdictions and adjusted per 100,000 people for days the mandates were or were not in effect,” wrote the authors, describing the methodology used.
If masks did even close to as advertised, one would expect to see the counties that went maskless to be absolute dumpster fires next to the counties that implemented mandates, right?
At the very least, the numbers should favor the masked areas by more than a percentage point or two. So, how did it go? Yep, it was the Mask Cult’s worse nightmare:
“When counties DID have a mandate in effect, there were 667,239 cases over 3,137 days with an average of 23 cases per 100,000 per day. When counties DID NOT have a countywide order, there were 438,687 cases over 12,139 days with an average of 22 cases per 100,000 per day.”
In other words, counties with mask-mandates in place actually did WORSE than those that refused to implement them. (Yeah, color me shocked.) The authors even accounted for population density in their analysis, suggesting that it didn’t have an impact on the numbers because four of the 12 most populous counties in Florida never had a countywide order.
“When the eight DID have an order in effect, there were 64 cases per 1,000. In periods 11 of 12 DID NOT have one, there were 40,” they wrote.
“But that’s just Florida,” you say. “They’re weirdos anyway. Surely masks have worked in the rest of the country.” Well, I’m glad you asked! The good folks at Rational Ground went on to compare national numbers, pitting the states that resisted the urge to impose a statewide mask mandate against those that masked up. How did those compare?
So there you have it, incontrovertible data evidence that mask mandates do little to nothing to stop or even slightly curb the spread of COVID-19.
If masks were the answer, wouldn’t you expect to see a drop in cases not long after mask mandates are implemented?
At the very least, wouldn’t you expect to see cases level off and STAY leveled off?
What you would NOT expect would be what has actually happened, for cases to spike as they have done since November seemingly all across the country, regardless of whether or not a mandatory masking policy was in place.
Further, wouldn’t you also expect states and areas that MASKED HARRDERRR than anyone else, states like California that have the ‘bold leadership’ to insist the plebes under their control mask up outside on hiking trails and sitting alone in parks, to have the lowest case counts of all?
Just look at the latest per capita numbers there compared to Florida and tell me with a straight face that mask mandates ‘work.’
As Dave Rubin adeptly pointed out earlier this month, Florida’s numbers “should be ten times higher” than California’s. I mean, nobody is asking for masks to work perfectly, but hell, shouldn’t we expect SOME performance?
Numbers and data like this get down to the brass tacks.
We can pit our doctors, scientists, and epidemiologists against their doctors, scientists, and epidemiologists on the actual science behind whether forcing people to put a moist, bacteria & virus-laden piece of cloth over the holes through which they breathe actually works to contain a virus that’s infinitesimally smaller than its threads (and yes, there are plenty of doctors, scientists, and epidemiologists on Team Reality too, and a bunch of them are on this must-follow Twitter list!), but if mask-mandates aren’t actually WORKING to curb the spread, why do we have them in place?
It’s complete and utter nonsense, of course. You know it, I know it, and the powers-that-be likely know it too. So why do they insist on continuing the charade? Whatever it is, it has NOTHING to do with either public health or real science.


humansarefree--2020-12-23--Just SAY NO to COVID Travel Bans

Just SAY NO to COVID Travel Bans

We ’ ve seen this movie before , and it ended with the largest power grab in world history .
“ It ’ s just two weeks to stop the spread.
” “ Just wear a mask .
It will allow for society to reopen.
” “ It ’ s just a ‘ pause ’ on non-essential activities and businesses.
” 2020 , the year that will be defined by corona hysteria and unprecedented global power grabs , is coming to an end , and the simulation is apparently resetting .
The conversation surrounding coronavirus mania has somehow reverted back @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It ’ s just a travel ban to the UK.
” Social media and news feeds are now rife with prominent politicians , “ public health experts , ” commentators and reporters discussing the merits of a travel ban to the United Kingdom , after reports surfaced that the Brits have discovered a new strain of the coronavirus , which is being advertised as 70 % more infectious ( ! )
than the last variant .
According to the “ public health experts , ” it ’ s time to panic again , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ virus .
Over 40 countries have now decided — following the reported discovery of the new variant of the coronavirus — to impose travel bans from the United Kingdom .
With that has come a new pressure campaign in the United States , led by the likes of New York Governor Andrew Cuomo and other lockdown advocates , to launch a new round of travel restrictions .
It seems that so many across the political spectrum have learned absolutely nothing from the pandora ’ s box of tyranny that was opened up at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the failure of travel bans to stop the spread of a respiratory virus with a 99.9 % recovery rate .
Like it or not , the United States is a very interconnected nation , serving thousands of international flights per day .
The U.S. is not New Zealand .
We are not a tiny island nation that can just cut itself off from the rest of the world at a moment ’ s notice .
If there ’ s a virus reportedly spreading across the Atlantic , it ’ s probably already here @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the corona hysteria space seem to not understand the rudimentary science behind mutations .
They ’ re seemingly too busy panicking and demanding further restrictions to be thoughtful about what to do next .
If a virus has mutated into an even more transmissible form , that can mean that the virus has become less lethal .
This also means that mitigation and suppression pseudoscience measures , such as lockdowns , masks , curfews , and the like have even less of a chance of working this time around , given that they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the spread with a less transmissible variant .
If a disease with an approaching 99.9 % recovery rate is becoming more transmissible , and possibly even less lethal , the idea that we should take dramatic , sweeping action to “ fight ” it is absolutely preposterous .
Before corona madness , anyone who advocated for a travel ban to stop seasonal influenza or the common cold would have been laughed out of the room .
The discourse surrounding “ stopping the spread ” of a virus has become so nonsensical and pointless @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these people and organizations are credentialed as “ experts , ” when their record of absolute failure would demonstrate otherwise .
We need to stop the spread of corona hysteria by rejecting any and all restrictions in the name of fighting a virus .
Stop empowering government bureaucrats and “ public health experts ” to run roughshod over our lives .
As we observed over the course of the year , a travel ban can fast transform into a devastating lockdown , when the travel ban inevitably fails in its mission .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a full reopening and a restoration of individual rights , not more restrictions in the name of stopping a virus that we have no control over .

We’ve seen this movie before, and it ended with the largest power grab in world history.
“It’s just a travel ban.”
“It’s just two weeks to stop the spread.”
“It’s just for non-essential workers.”
“Just wear a mask. It will allow for society to reopen.”
“It’s just a ‘pause’ on non-essential activities and businesses.”
2020, the year that will be defined by corona hysteria and unprecedented global power grabs, is coming to an end, and the simulation is apparently resetting.
The conversation surrounding coronavirus mania has somehow reverted back to square one, with:
“It’s just a travel ban to the UK.”
Social media and news feeds are now rife with prominent politicians, “public health experts,” commentators and reporters discussing the merits of a travel ban to the United Kingdom, after reports surfaced that the Brits have discovered a new strain of the coronavirus, which is being advertised as 70% more infectious (!) than the last variant.
According to the “public health experts,” it’s time to panic again, and take dramatic action to stop this virus.
The U.S. does not have plans for U.K. travel ban as a new Covid-19 strain pushes more than 40 countries to halt arrivals from Britain https://t.co/9rL8vDdIMg by @ElanaLyn pic.twitter.com/6osEaOLYIC — Forbes (@Forbes) December 21, 2020
Over 40 countries have now decided — following the reported discovery of the new variant of the coronavirus — to impose travel bans from the United Kingdom.
With that has come a new pressure campaign in the United States, led by the likes of New York Governor Andrew Cuomo and other lockdown advocates, to launch a new round of travel restrictions.
The new strain of Covid-19 is "flying around the world," Gov. Cuomo said. "I believe intuitively it's already here." He blasted the U.S. government for "doing nothing" and urged a travel ban from the U.K. or required testing of travelers https://t.co/e8RD0vsOq0 pic.twitter.com/9dsDPTZ39p — Bloomberg (@business) December 21, 2020
Mayor Bill de Blasio: "I believe in a travel ban from Europe." pic.twitter.com/d8wvOLB55N — The Hill (@thehill) December 22, 2020
It seems that so many across the political spectrum have learned absolutely nothing from the pandora’s box of tyranny that was opened up at the beginning of the year, following the failure of travel bans to stop the spread of a respiratory virus with a 99.9% recovery rate.
Like it or not, the United States is a very interconnected nation, serving thousands of international flights per day.
The U.S. is not New Zealand. We are not a tiny island nation that can just cut itself off from the rest of the world at a moment’s notice.
If there’s a virus reportedly spreading across the Atlantic, it’s probably already here, too.
Additionally, many in the corona hysteria space seem to not understand the rudimentary science behind mutations.
They’re seemingly too busy panicking and demanding further restrictions to be thoughtful about what to do next.
If a virus has mutated into an even more transmissible form, that can mean that the virus has become less lethal.
This also means that mitigation and suppression pseudoscience measures, such as lockdowns, masks, curfews, and the like have even less of a chance of working this time around, given that they did not work to slow or stop the spread with a less transmissible variant.
If a disease with an approaching 99.9% recovery rate is becoming more transmissible, and possibly even less lethal, the idea that we should take dramatic, sweeping action to “fight” it is absolutely preposterous.
Before corona madness, anyone who advocated for a travel ban to stop seasonal influenza or the common cold would have been laughed out of the room.
The discourse surrounding “stopping the spread” of a virus has become so nonsensical and pointless, yet at the same time, these people and organizations are credentialed as “experts,” when their record of absolute failure would demonstrate otherwise.
We need to stop the spread of corona hysteria by rejecting any and all restrictions in the name of fighting a virus.
Stop empowering government bureaucrats and “public health experts” to run roughshod over our lives.
As we observed over the course of the year, a travel ban can fast transform into a devastating lockdown, when the travel ban inevitably fails in its mission.
The only path forward involves advocating solely for a full reopening and a restoration of individual rights, not more restrictions in the name of stopping a virus that we have no control over.
By Jordan Schachtel, Guest writer


humansarefree--2020-12-23--Anti Human Rights: Brazil’s Supreme Court Rules in Support of Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccines

Brazil President Jair Bolsonaro recently said he would not partake in the coronavirus vaccine experiment .
Now the Supreme Court of Brazil is trying to make Brazilians believe that they have no rights , that they have to take the shots or they will be excluded from the rest of society .
A mob of ten out of eleven justices on Brazil ’ s Supreme Court support mandatory coronavirus vaccines , an assault on the principles of informed consent and medical privacy .
An unvaccinated person is NOT a filthy vector of disease , guilty of spreading diseases they do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ company says so .
Likewise , it is not a crime to be exposed to the environment , to acquire infections , and gain lifelong immunity to a long list of pathogens .
This Supreme Court ruling is an assault on human intelligence and human dignity .
Supreme Court Justice Ricardo Lewandowski wrote that anyone who refuses the new vaccines could face sanctions from federal , state and local governments .
Lewandowski said , “ the aggregate well-being can ’ t be hurt by the individuals who purposely decline to be inoculated.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can not show proof of vaccination will not be able to partake in certain activities or frequent certain buildings , venues or public gatherings .
Brazil ’ s Supreme Court ruled that no one can physically force the shots into people ’ s bodies , but society could be structured in a way to exclude the unvaccinated .
Civil authorities could require proof of vaccination at the local level , punishing individuals who do not submit by imposing fines and social ostracizing .
Only one justice voted against mandatory inoculations .
President Bolsonaro @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Nobody can force anybody to take the vaccine .
We ’ re dealing with lives , where is our freedom ?
” The federal health ministry of Brazil announced they will purchase 46 million doses of the experimental vaccine , as public health officials work on ways to make everyone submit .
Now Brazilian officials at the federal , state and municipal levels have been given the green light to impose legal measures that segregate and discriminate against the unvaccinated .
The Supreme Court of Brazil essentially believes pharmaceutical companies own human @ @ @ @ @ @ @ away freedoms until the people are deprived of their livelihood and human dignity .
More maniacal acts of violence have been introduced by public health officials , such as excluding unvaccinated children from school or withholding government benefits from adults who do not submit their bodies to this experiment of force .
Justice Luis Roberto Barroso , one of the mandatory vaccine proponents , said that collective rights must prevail over individual rights , no matter what .
He believes that people ’ s beliefs , medical history and personal understanding of human @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as the government promises safety through forced injection .
There is no precedence or clear legal definition of “ collective rights ” because there is no such thing .
The term “ collective rights ” refers to mob rule , an idea that is historically dangerous and a grave threat to human safety , health and freedom .

A three judge court in Peru has ruled that the COVID-19 pandemic was started by the billionaires Billy Boy, George Soros and Rockefeller.
Despite the ruling (read the resolution in full below), “fact-checkers” concluded that the Peruvian court had no evidence to make such a judgement citing declaration from the WHO and CDC who have lost all its credibility.
On December 21, 2020, a three judge Peruvian court declared that the coronavirus pandemic was started by billionares Billy Boy, George Soros and Rockefeller, ironically known as the Good Club – who want to save the world.
The resolution maintains that the criminal process was stopped because of the covid-19, so that it had an “unpredictable” nature, except for its creators “who handled it and continue to direct it with extreme secrecy within their environments and world corporations, with projections to the 2030 project.
As reported by the official Peruvian legal news service lpderecho citing the court order dated December 21, 2020:
c) .- The Plenary Agreement 01-2017 in its 18th foundation states: “… an extension of the preventive detention cannot be accepted if the criminal process was paralyzed without any cause of justification that legitimizes it …”
In the sub judice case, the criminal process was paralyzed due to the Covid 19 pandemic, created by the criminal elites, who dominate the world; and that it paralyzed the activities in almost all the countries of the globe, and nobody imagined its advent and its continuation in the future.
This event has an “unpredictable” nature, and is a justified cause that paralyzed, and will continue to hinder, not only the judicial work of the world’s Courts of Justice, but also all economic, social and cultural activities, and so far it has been doing so with pre-existing restrictions, including in our country.
Therefore, no world government, natural and legal persons, or the defendant’s defense, can maintain that this pandemic has the quality of “predictable”, except for its creators of the new world order like Billy Boy, Soros, Rockefeller, etc. that handled it and continue to direct it with extreme secrecy within their environments and global corporations, with projections for the 2030 project.
This being the case, the covid 19 pandemic undoubtedly constitutes a “special difficulty in hindering the investigation or criminal process ”.
What is not mentioned in the ruling is that the Rockefeller Foundation and the Clinton Foundation have developed a series of COVID apps which will tightly control your post-covid life. The initiative is launched by non-profit trust Commons Project Foundation which is part of the World Economic Forum.
The Commons Project include three COVID apps – CommonHealth, COVIDcheck and CommonPass. Together, they will collect, store and monitor your health data based on which the apps will decide whether you are eligible to travel, study, go to office, etc..
Rockefeller Foundation’s Operation Lockstep: ‘Under The Guise Of A Pandemic, We Will Create A Prison State’
The legal news service lpderecho reported on January 11, 2021, that top-level judicial officials in Peru announced they will start an investigation into the statement by the three judges.
Despite the ruling, “fact-checkers” concluded that the Peruvian court had no evidence to make such a judgement citing declaration from the WHO and CDC who have lost all its credibility. What is of interest is that Lead Stories, the Facebook fact-checker is itself funded by the Chinese and goes about debunking articles that point to their their role in the pandemic and giving clean-chits to their backers.
Worldwide Legal Action
Earlier, an Italian politician had demanded arrest of Billy Boy in Italian Parliament. Sara Cunial, MP for Rome denounced Billy Boy as “Vaccine Criminal” and urged Italian President to hand him over to the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity.
It was also revealed in an intercepted human intelligence report that Billy Boy offered $10 million bribe for a forced Coronavirus vaccination program in Nigeria.
As reported by GreatGameIndia last year, the President of Belarus had exposed that the World Bank coronavirus aid comes with conditions for imposing extreme lockdown measures, to model their coronavirus response on that of Italy and even changes in the economic policies which he refused as being “unacceptable”.
A major lawsuit has also been filed against the PM of Denmark for strict COVID-19 restrictions and for killing almost 17 million minks.
Just a week back, a German court in a landmark ruling has declared that COVID-19 lockdowns imposed by the government are unconstitutional. Thuringia’s spring lockdown was a “catastrophically wrong political decision with dramatic consequences for almost all areas of people’s lives,” the court said, justifying its decision.
Earlier, an American federal judge ruled coronavirus restrictions in Pennsylvania as unconstitutional.
Recently, a German Court ruled that COVID-19 lockdowns are unconstitutional. Also, a German Investigative Committee will launch legal action against those responsible for the COVID-19 crisis.
It was just announced that the Canadian Govt was sued for forceful quarantine of citizens at secret locations.
Even the Belgian health experts have demanded an investigation into the WHO for faking a pandemic.
These legal actions are desperately needed in the USA and UK as well.
In the past in 2010, the WHO was caught faking a pandemic and was forced to admit that its methodology of measuring the virality or the spread of the disease, instead of its severity was incorrect.
Source: GreatGameIndia.com


humansarefree--2020-12-23--Big Pharma is Suing Whistleblower Who Exposed COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects

Big Pharma is hitting back against a whistleblower who has valiantly come forward to detail the horrific side effects that he experienced from COVID-19 vaccines .
The Serum Institute of India ( SII ) is suing a 40-year-old Indian businessman who had participated in a clinical trial for a COVID-19 vaccine .
He went public with his account of suffering a “ neurological and psychological ” breakdown after being stuck with the dangerous shots .
“ He spent 15 days in hospital , including 8 days in intensive care , suffering from acute neuro-encephalopathy ( an altered mental state ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” so much so that he could no longer recognize close relatives , ” his wife said to reporters , per Science Magazine .
He is suing SII for $ 676,000 in damages and demanding that these clinical trials are immediately shuttered .
SII is suing the man in retaliation , alleging that he has engaged in “ malicious ” defamation against the massive corporation .
They claim he was “ specifically informed by the medical team that the complications he suffered were independent of the vaccine trial he underwent.
” They are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the whistleblower .
“ The COVISHIELD vaccine is safe and immunogenic .
The incident with the Chennai volunteer though highly unfortunate was in no way induced by the vaccine and Serum Institute of India is sympathetic with the volunteer ’ s medical condition , ” the SII said .
However , the whistleblower ’ s wife is claiming that her husband is still experiencing the negative impacts of Big Pharma ’ s shots .
“ Even after two weeks , simple things like online payments… he asks me to do .
He never @ @ @ @ @ @ @ project during the pandemic ; it was an American project that started on October 1 .
Apparently he has lost that .
Because of his condition the clients have moved back .
They wanted their work to be done quickly , ” she said .
Big League Politics has reported on how medical doctors have demanded for government and corporate interests to be honest with the public about the negative side effects of the vaccines : A group of doctors is urging the Center for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC ) to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ side effects that will come with the experimental COVID-19 vaccines that have been rushed through the testing process .
Dr. Sandra Fryhofer of the American Medical Association ( AMA ) is worried that lying to the public will cause them not to pursue the full COVID-19 vaccine treatment , which is expected to take at least two doses .
“ We really need to make patients aware that this is not going to be a walk in the park , ” Fryhofer said during a virtual meeting with the Advisory Committee on Immunization @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of outside medical experts tasked with advising the CDC .
“ They are going to know they had a vaccine .
They are probably not going to feel wonderful .
But they ’ ve got to come back for that second dose.
” Dr. Nancy Messonnier , who works as director of the CDC ’ s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases , says their agency is working on providing a guidance of sorts for health care officials about the side-effects of the COVID-19 vaccines .
“ How does that impact planning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which staff gets vaccinated which day ?
” Messonnier said .
However , the CDC does not seem too concerned about educating the public about the dangers of these experimental vaccines .
Big League Politics reported months ago on how initial guinea pigs for these shots experienced horrific side effects .
The technocracy is taking shape , and with America virtually overthrown via the electoral steal coup d ’ état , there will be nothing standing in the way to stop it from reigning supreme .

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro says his country has designed “a highly effective antiviral” that decimates coronavirus without any side effects.
The drug will be presented to the WHO for certification, he added.
“I want to say that Venezuela has developed a medicine that annihilates 100 percent of the coronavirus,” Maduro said on Sunday, describing it as a “highly effective antiviral.”
It was designed by the Venezuelan Institute for Scientific Research (IVIC), which has been working on a cure for the virus for the past six months, he noted.
The medicine is based on a molecule called TR-10, which was isolated and, when pitted against the virus, proved its absolute effectiveness, he claimed.
Maduro said the study has already been reviewed by experts and scientists, and will be presented to the World Health Organization (WHO) so that it can certify its findings.
As he touted the potential breakthrough in Covid-19 therapy, Maduro said Venezuela looks forward “to offering this treatment to the world,” congratulating the IVIC on “this great contribution to humanity.” Mass production of the drug will be facilitated through “international alliances,” he said, without elaborating.
The newly-developed drug is completely safe, the institute claimed, insisting it “does not affect healthy molecules in the body” and does not result in any side effects.
The studies were conducted on virus cells isolated from Venezuelan coronavirus patients, Gabriela Jiménez, the minister of science and technology, said.
The molecule is an ursolic acid derivative, which “has shown 100 percent inhibition of virus replication in vitro [outside of a living organism],” she said, as cited by EFE News Agency…
Source: RT.com (excerpt)


humansarefree--2020-12-24--‘Atrocious’: Congress Crams Language to Criminalize Online Streaming and Meme-Sharing Into 5,500-Pag

‘Atrocious’: Congress Crams Language to Criminalize Online Streaming and Meme-Sharing Into 5,500-Page Omnibus Bill

“ These types of decisions should never be made in closed-door negotiations between politicians and industry or rushed through as part of some must-pass spending package.
” Lawmakers in Congress are under fire from digital rights campaigners for embedding three controversial changes to online copyright and trademark laws into the must-pass $ 2.3 trillion legislative package — which includes a $ 1.4 trillion omnibus spending bill and a $ 900 billion Covid-19 relief bill — that could receive floor votes in the House and Senate as early as Monday evening .
The punitive provisions crammed into the enormous bill ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the digital rights group Fight for the Future , “ threaten ordinary Internet users with up to $ 30,000 in fines for engaging in everyday activity such as downloading an image and re-uploading it… [ or ] sharing memes.
” While the citizenry had almost no time to process the actual contents of the 5,593 page legislative text , Greer said Monday afternoon that the CASE Act , Felony Streaming Act , and Trademark Modernization Act “ are in fact included in the must-pass omnibus spending bill.
” As Mike Masnick explained in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The CASE Act will supercharge copyright trolling exactly at a time when we need to fix the law to have less trolling .
And the felony streaming bill ( which was only just revealed last week with no debate or discussion ) includes provisions that are so confusing and vague no one is sure if it makes sites like Twitch into felons .
“ The fact that these are getting added to the must-pass government funding bill is just bad government , ” Masnick added .
“ And congressional leadership should hear about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Future , “ More than 20,000 people had called on House and Senate leadership to remove these dangerous and unnecessary provisions from the must-pass bill , ” yet Congress chose to include them anyway .
“ This is atrocious , ” Greer said in her statement .
“ We ’ re facing a massive eviction crisis and millions are unemployed due to the pandemic , but congressional leaders could only muster $ 600 stimulus checks for Covid relief.
” And yet , lawmakers “ managed to cram in handouts for content companies like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The CASE Act is a terribly written law that will threaten ordinary Internet users with huge fines for everyday online activity .
It ’ s absurd that lawmakers included these provisions in a must-pass spending bill.
” Explaining why the inclusion of these provisions is dangerous , Masnick said “ there ’ s a reason [ why ] copyright is generally controversial.
” Even “ small changes ” threaten a “ massive impact on… the public ’ s ability to express themselves , ” he wrote .
The CASE Act would create a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” who would work to resolve infringement claims .
As outlined in the bill , copyright holders could be awarded up to $ 30,000 if they find their creative work being shared online .
Proponents of the CASE Act , like the Copyright Alliance , argue that the bill would make it easier for independent artists to bring about copyright claims without having to endure the lengthy and expensive federal courts process .
Still , critics of the bill , like the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Fight for the Future , argue that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ users for engaging in everyday online behavior like sharing memes .
Greer echoed Masnick , saying that “ we ’ ve seen time and time again that changes to copyright law have profound implications for online freedom of expression and human rights.
” “ Frivolous copyright takedowns are already a huge problem for the next generation of artists and creators , streamers , gamers , and activists , ” Greer noted , advocating instead for what she called “ a fair system that protects human rights and ensures artists are fairly compensated.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ suffering immensely during the pandemic , ” Greer added , “ Congress should be working quickly to provide immediate relief , not cramming controversial , poison-pill legislation into budget bills to appease special interests.
” The way Congress jammed through these changes “ is a total and complete travesty , ” said Masnick .
“ People should be mad about this and should hold the congressional leadership of both parties responsible.
” Calling on “ House and Senate leadership to remove the copyright provisions from the continuing resolution and move them through regular @ @ @ @ @ @ @ open debate about the right balance , ” Greer said that “ these types of decisions should never be made in closed-door negotiations between politicians and industry or rushed through as part of some must-pass spending package .
”

“These types of decisions should never be made in closed-door negotiations between politicians and industry or rushed through as part of some must-pass spending package.”
by Kenny Stancil
Lawmakers in Congress are under fire from digital rights campaigners for embedding three controversial changes to online copyright and trademark laws into the must-pass $2.3 trillion legislative package — which includes a $1.4 trillion omnibus spending bill and a $900 billion Covid-19 relief bill — that could receive floor votes in the House and Senate as early as Monday evening.
The punitive provisions crammed into the enormous bill (pdf), warned Evan Greer of the digital rights group Fight for the Future, “threaten ordinary Internet users with up to $30,000 in fines for engaging in everyday activity such as downloading an image and re-uploading it… [or] sharing memes.”
While the citizenry had almost no time to process the actual contents of the 5,593 page legislative text, Greer said Monday afternoon that the CASE Act, Felony Streaming Act, and Trademark Modernization Act “are in fact included in the must-pass omnibus spending bill.”
As Mike Masnick explained in a piece at TechDirt on Monday:
The CASE Act will supercharge copyright trolling exactly at a time when we need to fix the law to have less trolling. And the felony streaming bill (which was only just revealed last week with no debate or discussion) includes provisions that are so confusing and vague no one is sure if it makes sites like Twitch into felons.
“The fact that these are getting added to the must-pass government funding bill is just bad government,” Masnick added. “And congressional leadership should hear about this.”
Um. Admitting that you're using a must pass government funding bill to sneak through legislation that you couldn't pass normally is… a choice I guess. https://t.co/atkS2Ny8nr — Mike Masnick (@mmasnick) December 21, 2020
According to Fight for the Future, “More than 20,000 people had called on House and Senate leadership to remove these dangerous and unnecessary provisions from the must-pass bill,” yet Congress chose to include them anyway.
“This is atrocious,” Greer said in her statement. “We’re facing a massive eviction crisis and millions are unemployed due to the pandemic, but congressional leaders could only muster $600 stimulus checks for Covid relief.”
And yet, lawmakers “managed to cram in handouts for content companies like Disney?” Greer continued. “The CASE Act is a terribly written law that will threaten ordinary Internet users with huge fines for everyday online activity. It’s absurd that lawmakers included these provisions in a must-pass spending bill.”
They're voting soon. Keep making noise! Even if this bill passes we are going to have a massive fight in 2021 to fix the DMCA and defend the rights of Internet users and online creators. Keep retweeting, keep signing petitions, keep sounding the alarm.https://t.co/AuXeBYNEOm — Fight for the Future (@fightfortheftr) December 21, 2020
Explaining why the inclusion of these provisions is dangerous, Masnick said “there’s a reason [why] copyright is generally controversial.” Even “small changes” threaten a “massive impact on… the public’s ability to express themselves,” he wrote.
As The Verge’s Makena Kelly reported:
The CASE Act would create a quasi-judicial tribunal of “Copyright Claims Officers” who would work to resolve infringement claims. As outlined in the bill, copyright holders could be awarded up to $30,000 if they find their creative work being shared online.
Proponents of the CASE Act, like the Copyright Alliance, argue that the bill would make it easier for independent artists to bring about copyright claims without having to endure the lengthy and expensive federal courts process. Still, critics of the bill, like the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Fight for the Future, argue that the CASE Act could fine ordinary internet users for engaging in everyday online behavior like sharing memes.
Greer echoed Masnick, saying that “we’ve seen time and time again that changes to copyright law have profound implications for online freedom of expression and human rights.”
“Frivolous copyright takedowns are already a huge problem for the next generation of artists and creators, streamers, gamers, and activists,” Greer noted, advocating instead for what she called “a fair system that protects human rights and ensures artists are fairly compensated.”
Considering how artists and musicians “are suffering immensely during the pandemic,” Greer added, “Congress should be working quickly to provide immediate relief, not cramming controversial, poison-pill legislation into budget bills to appease special interests.”
The way Congress jammed through these changes “is a total and complete travesty,” said Masnick.
“People should be mad about this and should hold the congressional leadership of both parties responsible.”
Calling on “House and Senate leadership to remove the copyright provisions from the continuing resolution and move them through regular order so we can have transparent and open debate about the right balance,” Greer said that “these types of decisions should never be made in closed-door negotiations between politicians and industry or rushed through as part of some must-pass spending package.”


humansarefree--2020-12-25--Robert Kennedy Jr. Warns of Coup to Overcome World Democracies

Robert Kennedy , Jr. sees what many of Americans see .
The Big Corporations and Elites want to take over @ @ @ @ @ freedoms .
Robert Kennedy , Jr. , son of Bobby Kennedy Sr ( the former @ @ @ @ @ , John F. Kennedy ) , has warned about Big Pharma and Big Tech joining @ @ @ @ @ s warned about Bill Gates ’ bio security agenda , the rise of the authoritarian @ @ @ @ @ Pharma sponsored coup d ’ etat against liberal democracy in a protest in Germany this @ @ @ @ @ Jr. warns again of the Big Pharma , Big Tech , Big Media agenda that @ @ @ @ @ if brought to fruition : Bill Gates And The Depopulation Agenda – Robert F. Kennedy @ @ @ @ @ Our hope is President Trump .
We must win to stop these globalists from tearing @ @ @ @ @ taking all our freedoms away .

Robert Kennedy, Jr. sees what many of Americans see. The Big Corporations and Elites want to take over the world and our individual freedoms.
by Joe Hoft
Robert Kennedy, Jr., son of Bobby Kennedy Sr (the former Attorney General for his brother, John F. Kennedy), has warned about Big Pharma and Big Tech joining forces before.
He’s warned about Billy Boy’ bio security agenda, the rise of the authoritarian surveillance state and the Big Pharma sponsored coup d’etat against liberal democracy in a protest in Germany this past August.
Robert Kennedy Jr. warns again of the Big Pharma, Big Tech, Big Media agenda that will enslave the human race if brought to fruition:
So powerful, from @RobertKennedyJr "This is pharmaceutical-driven, biosecurity agenda that will enslave the human race and plunge us into a dystopian nightmare, where apocalyptical forces of ignorance and greed will be running our lives, and ruining our children" Please RT pic.twitter.com/2l6fithd7w — Ian Lyne (@lyne_ian) December 19, 2020
Billy Boy And The Depopulation Agenda – Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Calls For An Investigation
Our hope is President Trump. We must win to stop these globalists from tearing our world apart and from taking all our freedoms away.


humansarefree--2020-12-24--Putin: Multiculturalism Has Failed the West

Just because the Wuhan virus has sucked out all the political energy from political discussions , does not mean other issues such as immigration should be ignored .
Josh Hammer , a syndicated columnist , wrote a piece at American Greatness emphasizing how “ Donald Trump famously sought the presidency in 2016 on a platform that elevated the immigration issue to the singular political forefront.
” In his piece , “ Immigration Politics Went Away During COVID-19 .
It ’ s Coming Back ” , Hammer is correct in observing that “ immigration , both legal and illegal , represents @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Hammer brilliantly spelled out why immigration is such an important issue : “ No other political issue so broadly affects virtually every other — whether it is economics , national security , foreign policy , culture and religion , crime and law and order , or congressional apportionment — as that most foundational issue of any legitimate self-governing politics : who we quite literally are , as a polity and a citizenry.
” Trump ’ s presidency has been a mixed bag , with it allocating political capital towards tax cuts and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , instead of taking a full-fledged focus on infrastructure projects targeting the Midwest or going all out to pass an immigration moratorium .
On the latter immigration matter , Trump was able to gain some marginal victories to build a border wall , roll back then-President Barack Obama ’ s Deferred Action for Child Arrivals amnesty scheme , scrap the Obama-era “ catch and release ” policy that served as an illegal immigration magnet , implement a public charge rule , halt the use of certain visas during the Wuhan virus pandemic , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” policy to stem the flow of Central American migrants to the U.S.. Trump was not an abject failure on the immigration issue , but his administration still left a lot to be desired for border hawks .
Nevertheless , Trump ’ s administration was the first in the post-Cold War era that nominally put immigration restrictionist ideas at the front of public discussion .
The Wuhan virus , not so much legislation or regulatory edicts , ultimately turned out to be the biggest force for immigration restriction in 2020 .
Hammer compared @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of this year and 2019 to hammer away at this point : The result was that the immigration issue , the hallmark of Trump ’ s insurgent 2016 campaign , receded in importance as an electoral issue .
Trump sometimes spoke on the stump about building a fuller border wall in a second term , but the contrast between his 2020 reelection campaign and his inaugural 2016 campaign was striking .
With COVID-19 lockdowns , dire need for fiscal relief to struggling or laid-off workers , midsummer urban anarchy and a harrowing rise @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rise of Communist China , there were simply too many other things on voters ’ minds to pay heed to an issue that COVID-19 had largely taken out of play .
However , within the last few months leading up to the elections , illegal immigration began surging and apprehensions started to rise , which Hammer detailed : But as the election neared , illegal border crossings rose again .
Border Patrol combined apprehensions/inadmissibles in September , October and November 2020 were all higher than their corresponding months one year prior .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ presidential ascension of immigration dove Joe Biden neared , was impossible to ignore .
And as John Daniel Davidson recently noted in the New York Post , a brand-new mass of migrant “ caravans ” is now forming in Honduras , with its eyes set on the U.S. border .
Make no mistake about it , immigration will come back to the center of political discussion once Biden is likely installed as president on January 20 .
Republicans will need to be prepared to fight .
Once the inevitable migration wave reaches our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sob stories to be exploited by the mainstream media .
This is nothing but a ruse .
It ’ s all about conditioning the public into accepting some form of amnesty .
Republicans can not afford to let the Left come out on top in the amnesty battle .
Losing on amnesty would be the final step in the Left ’ s quest to consolidate power and usher in a one party-state .
This would mark the end of the American Republic and the freedoms that have made it unique among nations .

Just because the Wuhan virus has sucked out all the political energy from political discussions, does not mean other issues such as immigration should be ignored.
Josh Hammer, a syndicated columnist, wrote a piece at American Greatness emphasizing how “Donald Trump famously sought the presidency in 2016 on a platform that elevated the immigration issue to the singular political forefront.”
In his piece, “Immigration Politics Went Away During COVID-19. It’s Coming Back”, Hammer is correct in observing that “immigration, both legal and illegal, represents the indispensable issue facing the United States.”
Hammer brilliantly spelled out why immigration is such an important issue:
“No other political issue so broadly affects virtually every other — whether it is economics, national security, foreign policy, culture and religion, crime and law and order, or congressional apportionment — as that most foundational issue of any legitimate self-governing politics: who we quite literally are, as a polity and a citizenry.”
Trump’s presidency has been a mixed bag, with it allocating political capital towards tax cuts and a jailbreak initiative from 2017 to 2018, instead of taking a full-fledged focus on infrastructure projects targeting the Midwest or going all out to pass an immigration moratorium.
On the latter immigration matter, Trump was able to gain some marginal victories to build a border wall, roll back then-President Barack Obama’s Deferred Action for Child Arrivals amnesty scheme, scrap the Obama-era “catch and release” policy that served as an illegal immigration magnet, implement a public charge rule, halt the use of certain visas during the Wuhan virus pandemic, and negotiated a “Remain in Mexico” policy to stem the flow of Central American migrants to the U.S..
Trump was not an abject failure on the immigration issue, but his administration still left a lot to be desired for border hawks.
Nevertheless, Trump’s administration was the first in the post-Cold War era that nominally put immigration restrictionist ideas at the front of public discussion.
The Wuhan virus, not so much legislation or regulatory edicts, ultimately turned out to be the biggest force for immigration restriction in 2020.
Hammer compared the numbers of border apprehensions between April of this year and 2019 to hammer away at this point:
The result was that the immigration issue, the hallmark of Trump’s insurgent 2016 campaign, receded in importance as an electoral issue.
Trump sometimes spoke on the stump about building a fuller border wall in a second term, but the contrast between his 2020 reelection campaign and his inaugural 2016 campaign was striking.
With COVID-19 lockdowns, dire need for fiscal relief to struggling or laid-off workers, midsummer urban anarchy and a harrowing rise of violent crime, and the ever-ascendant rise of Communist China, there were simply too many other things on voters’ minds to pay heed to an issue that COVID-19 had largely taken out of play.
However, within the last few months leading up to the elections, illegal immigration began surging and apprehensions started to rise, which Hammer detailed:
But as the election neared, illegal border crossings rose again. Border Patrol combined apprehensions/inadmissibles in September, October and November 2020 were all higher than their corresponding months one year prior.
The timing, as the widely assumed impending presidential ascension of immigration dove Joe Biden neared, was impossible to ignore.
And as John Daniel Davidson recently noted in the New York Post, a brand-new mass of migrant “caravans” is now forming in Honduras, with its eyes set on the U.S. border.
Make no mistake about it, immigration will come back to the center of political discussion once Biden is likely installed as president on January 20. Republicans will need to be prepared to fight.
Once the inevitable migration wave reaches our border, there will be plenty of sob stories to be exploited by the mainstream media. This is nothing but a ruse. It’s all about conditioning the public into accepting some form of amnesty.
Republicans cannot afford to let the Left come out on top in the amnesty battle.
Losing on amnesty would be the final step in the Left’s quest to consolidate power and usher in a one party-state.
This would mark the end of the American Republic and the freedoms that have made it unique among nations.
By Jose Nino, Guest writer


humansarefree--2020-12-24--Trump Declassifies Documents to Expose Joe Biden and the Deep State Traitors

Today ’ s Situation Update reveals how Trump appears to have chosen the “ declassification ” option to expose Joe Biden and the deep state traitors .
• More rumors of C-17 transport planes arriving in Nevada .
• Rumors that Trump will speak to America on Christmas Day .
• Trump appoints Ezra Cohen-Watnick [ believed to be Q ] to Chairperson of the Public Interest Declassification Board , which is responsible for deciding which documents get declassified .
Watnick is known to be an ally of Gen. Michael Flynn and Trump .
( Whitehouse.gov ) • Trump signs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any new special counsel to use classified documents with grand juries in order to seek new criminal indictments against deep state players .
This order would also apply to Sidney Powell if she is appointed special counsel in the coming days .
( Whitehouse.gov ) • Joe Biden was involved in the 2016 spygate / FISA warrant scandal and may be exposed in the coming document dumps .
• Wisconsin judge testifies that over 200,000 votes were illegal and invalid in that state .
• Join the march in D.C. on January 6th @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s gon na be wild !
” • National File reports that the White House has released an internal memo essentially compelling VP Pence to act today , rejecting the electoral votes from states that carried out fraudulent , unconstitutional elections .
• Georgia lawmakers move to certify their own election .
• Arizona lawmakers are working to certify Trump as the true winner .
• Patrick Byrne reveals Trump is just one signature away from unleashing a powerful solution .
• Trump meets with multiple members of Congress to discuss a Jan. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ big revelation is coming about fraud in Georgia .
Listen to the full podcast here :

Today’s Situation Update reveals how Trump appears to have chosen the “declassification” option to expose Joe Biden and the deep state traitors.
Here’s what you’ll learn in today’s Situation Update:
More rumors of C-17 transport planes arriving in Nevada.
Rumors that Trump will speak to America on Christmas Day.
Trump appoints Ezra Cohen-Watnick [believed to be Q] to Chairperson of the Public Interest Declassification Board, which is responsible for deciding which documents get declassified. Watnick is known to be an ally of Gen. Michael Flynn and Trump. (Whitehouse.gov)
Trump signs new memorandum to allow John Durham and any new special counsel to use classified documents with grand juries in order to seek new criminal indictments against deep state players. This order would also apply to Sidney Powell if she is appointed special counsel in the coming days. (Whitehouse.gov)
Joe Biden was involved in the 2016 spygate / FISA warrant scandal and may be exposed in the coming document dumps.
Wisconsin judge testifies that over 200,000 votes were illegal and invalid in that state.
Join the march in D.C. on January 6th. Trump says, “It’s gonna be wild!”
National File reports that the White House has released an internal memo essentially compelling VP Pence to act today, rejecting the electoral votes from states that carried out fraudulent, unconstitutional elections.
Georgia lawmakers move to certify their own election.
Arizona lawmakers are working to certify Trump as the true winner.
Patrick Byrne reveals Trump is just one signature away from unleashing a powerful solution.
Trump meets with multiple members of Congress to discuss a Jan. 6th solution.
Giuliani says a big revelation is coming about fraud in Georgia.
Listen to the full podcast here:

Source: Hangthecensors.com


humansarefree--2020-12-24--Hospitals Worry That COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects May Cause Staff Shortages

This article should give one pause to ponder all the hype and fanfare about those covid vaccines with a bit of skepticism .
It was spotted by M.G .
( to whom a thank for passing it along ) .
The plot ?
Health care workers and professionals are concerned that side effects from the covid “ vaccines ” – you know , those “ vaccines ” that are of an entirely new type containing mRNA that might conveivably tinker with one ’ s DNA , and that have to be kept in below freezing conditions for some unexplained reason @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to deal with them .
Or to put all that country simple “ Hospitals worry that vaccine side effects may cause staff shortages.
” According to the CDC , as of December 18 , 2020 , 3,150 people who were vaccinated against COVID-19 became “ unable to perform normal daily activities ” .
Now , that ’ s not my headline , but rather the conclusion that M.G .
drew from the article emailed to me .
In fact , it was the subject header of the email , which I ’ m @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , because after reading the article , I think M.G .
nailed it .
Here ’ s the article with its own more euphemistic way of stating the problem : Vaccines ’ Side Effects Risk Sidelining Health Workers While Cases Surge .
Now this one is truly a stunner when you read it .
And remember , folks , these people are serious ; they ’ re not making jokes , nor trying to be funny , even though I couldn ’ t help but laugh when I read some of their statements @ @ @ @ @ @ @ article , and presenting them seriatim , we have this : Covid-19 vaccine side-effects that range from fevers and chills to headaches and joint pain could keep some doctors and nurses from working amid a nationwide surge in hospitalizations .
… Earlier this week , federal advisers recommended U.S. health-care workers be immunized first , along with residents of long-term care facilities .
For hospitals , that could pose significant scheduling issues at a time when many are filling up .
More than 100,000 Americans were hospitalized with the virus on Wednesday , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Project .
… Providers will need to pull medical staff from the bedside to the vaccination clinic to get their shots .
And if side effects do occur , they could lose key workers for a couple of days .
To overcome this , some hospitals plan to stagger staff to keep units covered .
Others are exploring giving workers the shots at the end of their shifts , before they have a few days off .
Still , it ’ s difficult to know what to expect without seeing full data from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ late-stage clinical trials , said Paul Biddinger , vice chair of emergency preparedness at Massachusetts General Hospital .
“ It ’ s a little easier to create a model for how we should stagger employee vaccinations when we know how commonly [ side effects ] are occurring and with what severity , ” Biddinger said .
Plans could change when more robust data becomes available , he added .
So , the side effects might be fevers and chills – signs usually of sickness – but no , anyone ( like my own @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine will know this response well .
Take a vaccine , so you don ’ t get sick from the flu , but rather from the vaccine ( which has the flu in it… makes perfect [ non ] sense to me .
But anyway , back to the plot story : in order to protect people from a sickness , we ’ re going to give them a vaccine whose side-effects , while not completely known ( ! )
might include typical vaccine side-effects like the very symptoms of the bug we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re going to insist it be given to health care professionals first , during a spike in cases of the disease that they are vaccinating against , in order to have less health care professionals available due to possible side effects which we don ’ t really know .
And all those plans “ could change when most robust data becomes available.
” Wait… what ?
You mean , the data about the new vaccines isn ’ t robust already ?
Oh , yea , wait , I forgot .
We ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ consulting a previous blog ) … oh about 0.0008 % of the total US population .
That sounds like a good plan to me .
Get everyone vaccinated with some stuff we don ’ t really know the effect of .
And let ’ s give it to health care professionals first… I don ’ t know about you , folks , but it sounds a little bit to me like someone wants the health care field itself to become sick… maybe this guy… He looks like the type .
The Founder of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( White Cat not pictured ) .
See you on the flip side…


humansarefree--2020-12-24--WHO Changes Definition of ‘Herd Immunity’, Literally Re-writing Hundreds of Years of Scientific Unde

WHO Changes Definition of ‘Herd Immunity’, Literally Re-writing Hundreds of Years of Scientific Understanding, Just to Push Vaccines

The World Health Organization has changed the definition of “ herd immunity , ” eliminating the pre-COVID consensus that it could be achieved by allowing a virus to spread through a population , and insisting that herd immunity comes solely from vaccines .
The change occurred on a section of the WHO ’ s website entitled ‘ Coronavirus disease ( COVID-19 ) : Serology , antibodies and immunity ’ .
The WHO ’ s original definition ( archived here ) states that herd immunity “ happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection @ @ @ @ @ @ @ haven ’ t been infected , or in whom an infection hasn ’ t triggered an immune response , they are protected because people around them who are immune can act as buffers between them and an infected person.
” The original definition fails to identify the pre-COVID consensus on what is meant by “ herd immunity , ” which is when a population becomes protected against a virus because enough people have been infected with it to create community immunity .
However , the WHO ’ s updated version is even more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only be achieved by mass vaccination programs .
“ ‘ Herd immunity ’ , also known as ‘ population immunity ’ , is a concept used for vaccination , in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached , ” states the WHO website , adding , “ Herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus , not by exposing them to it.
” “ ‘ Herd immunity ’ exists when a high percentage of the population is vaccinated , ” states @ @ @ @ @ @ @ meaning of “ herd immunity , ” which is when a population becomes immune to a virus by being exposed to it .
Complaint To The Hague ’ s International Criminal Court : WHO Chief Should Be Investigated Over GENOCIDE By changing the definition of “ herd immunity , ” the WHO is literally re-writing hundreds of years of scientific understanding as to what the term truly means in an apparent effort to silence any argument that herd immunity would have been a better approach to fighting COVID-19 than lockdowns and social distancing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Belarus , two countries where hard lockdowns and mask mandates have not been imposed ] .

As revealed by a 2020 attendee list anonymously given to Quartz, Davos has a way of separating even the global “elite” into strata. The hierarchy of attendees is enumerated in the World Economic Forum’s (“WEF’s”) databases. Participants are put into categories numbered from one to seven — an indication, of sorts, of how senior or perhaps important a delegate is to the business world.
Nearly every person attending is assigned one of these “position levels.” Those listed as ones are labelled things like “Top Executive” or “Head of State.” Twos are labelled in positions like “Senior Executives” and “Deputy Head of State.” Central bankers are level three. Level four includes country officials in a sub-ministerial post. Local government officials are level five. People in honorary positions are level six. Level seven is for those classified as “Functional Staff.”
What was discussed at Davos 2020? The theme of the 50th annual meeting of the Davos mob was titled ‘Stakeholders for a Cohesive and Sustainable World’ and included a ‘Special Address by Han Zheng, Vice-Premier of the People’s Republic of China’.
While the majority most likely enthusiastically agree, or are sufficiently self-serving not to care, not everyone who attends Davos’ annual meetings agrees with WEF’s agenda or, at least, not entirely.
President Donald Trump, for example, attended Davos in 2020 but, it seems, he flew in the face of the globalist party line. In a speech he gave, instead of espousing WEF’s environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) and climate change agenda, Trump focused on the success of his putting Americans first policy and the positive impact it was having on the US economy and American’s lives. You can watch his speech at Davos 2020 HERE.
This was confirmed in an interview the next day with CNBC, “Even the New York Times… acknowledges that the Davos elite are accepting that your policies are working and the US economy is the envy of the world. … [yesterday] what the CEO’s are talking about … all they wanted to talk about, was the strength of the US economy. It’s the envy of the world. And I think if you have a strong economy, all these ancillary issues become easier to deal with. And I think even the Europeans, even the plutocrats of Davos, are now acknowledging that.,” CNBC’s Joe Kernen said.
According to the WEF “by 2025 they do not want us to take anything from nature, anything we consume will be laboratory generated,” Celeste Solum told David Icke in an interview discussing the Barcode of Life initiative. Although not appearing on WEF’s list published by Quartz, in January 2020 Solum attended remotely and was horrified to discover that the plans were “operational.” Solum said, “this Covid situation is the first deployment of a construct, a new life form if you will. It is not a virus it is a nano synthetic biological.”
Filtering the list published by Quartz for “Head of State” and “Prime Minister” there were a total of 75 attendees from 54 countries: 49 categorised as Level 1; 16 as Level 2; 6 as Level 3; and, the remaining 4 as Level 4 to 7.
Some are past or former heads of state or prime ministers, for example, former UK prime ministers David Cameron and Tony Blair are included. And others, such as the third attendee listed as from the UK – Sir Edward Lister described as Chief Strategy Adviser to the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom – is picked up by the filter as his job description contains the words “Prime Minister.”
It’s notable that all three of these UK attendees, so-called global “elites,” are no strangers to controversy:
Tony Blair was accused of war crimes and the Chilcot Inquiry report subsequently gave a damning assessment of his role in the Iraq War.
David Cameron was entrenched in the Greensill lobbying scandal.
Sir Edward, appointed as top aide to Prime Minister Boris Johnson in 2021, quit after only two months in his role amid an ongoing row over lobbying.
Including these former and associated, attached below is the list of the 75 “Head of State” and “Prime Minister” attendees sorted by country.
Davos-2020-Heads-of-States-Attendees
Source: DailyExpose.uk


humansarefree--2020-12-25--THEY’RE LYING TO YOU: WHO Deletes Naturally Acquired Immunity from Their Website

TGP first reported on March 17 , 2020 , on the controversial Ethiopian politician and WHO Director General , Tedros , and his irresponsible and criminal fear mongering .
Tedros claimed in a press conference in early March that the fatality rate for the coronavirus was 3.4 % .
He then compared this rate to the rate of the common flu which is estimated to be around 0.1 % .
This was a lie .
We knew it then and reported on it .
He manipulated data to make this statement .
This egregiously false premise led to the greatest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Director General of the WHO spoke on March 3 , 2020 and shared this related to the coronavirus : While many people globally have built up immunity to seasonal flu strains , COVID-19 is a new virus to which no one has immunity .
That means more people are susceptible to infection , and some will suffer severe disease .
Globally , about 3.4 % of reported COVID-19 cases have died .
By comparison , seasonal flu generally kills far fewer than 1 % of those infected .
Globally , about 3.4 % @ @ @ @ @ @ @ By comparison , seasonal flu generally kills far fewer than 1 % of those infected .
Here is the video of Dr. Ghebreyesus ’ s remarks : The problems with his claims were that he didn ’ t explain that the estimate of mortality rates for the flu included millions of individuals who had the flu but were not tested or identified with the flu .
The calculation he used for COVID-19 was different and not adjusted for the millions of individuals who would similarly have COVID-19 and not be confirmed or tested @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this observation but then in June , the CDC announced a similar estimated number of Americans had the China coronavirus but have not been tested and confirmed for having it .
The CDC estimated a minimum of 20 million Americans at that time had COVID-19 resulting in the mortality rates for the China coronavirus in the US being very similar to that of the common flu confirming what we reported in March .
The WHO continues to show it is a political organization first and health care organization second or third .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ attempt to promote the global COVID19 vaccine .
This is a sinister and dishonest attempt to rewrite science in order to favor their vaccination scheme .
Via The American Institute of Economic Research : The World Health Organization , for reasons unknown , has suddenly changed its definition of a core conception of immunology : herd immunity .
Its discovery was one of the major achievements of 20th century science , gradually emerging in the 1920s and then becoming ever more refined throughout the 20th century .
Herd immunity is a fascinating observation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or statistical probability theory , whichever you prefer .
Herd immunity speaks directly , and with explanatory power , to the empirical observation that respiratory viruses are either widespread and mostly mild ( common cold ) or very severe and short-lived ( Ebola ) … …This strange institution called the World Health Organization – once glorious because it was mainly responsible for the eradication of smallpox – has suddenly decided to delete everything I just wrote from cell biology basics .
It has literally changed the science in a Soviet-like way .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mention of natural immunities from its website .
It has taken the additional step of actually mischaracterizing the structure and functioning of vaccines .
So that you will believe me , I will try to be as precise as possible .
Here is the website from June 9 , 2020 .
You can see it here on Archive.org .
You have to move down the page and click on the question about herd immunity .
You see the following : However , in a screenshot dated November 13 , 2020 , we read @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pretends as if human beings do not have immune systems at all but rather rely entirely on big pharma to inject things into our blood .

A French journalist who returned from Ukraine after arriving with volunteer fighters told broadcaster CNews that Americans are directly “in charge” of the war on the ground.
The assertion was made by Le Figaro senior international correspondent Georges Malbrunot. Malbrunot said he had accompanied French volunteer fighters, two of whom had previously fought against ISIS.
“I had the surprise, and so did they, to discover that to be able to enter the Ukrainian army, well it’s the Americans who are in charge,” said Malbrunot.
Adding that he and the volunteers “almost got arrested” by the Americans, who asserted they were in charge, the journalist then revealed that they were forced to sign a contract “until the end of the war.”
“And who is in charge? It’s the Americans, I saw it with my own eyes,” said Malbrunot, adding, “I thought I was with the international brigades, and I found myself facing the Pentagon.”
French reporter returning from Ukraine "Americans are directly in charge of the war on the ground." pic.twitter.com/m5yr7far6N — no one (@antiwar_soldier) April 11, 2022
Malbrunot also mentioned America providing Ukraine with switchblade suicide drones, something highlighted by Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin in a tweet that revealed Ukrainian soldiers were being trained to use the devices in Biloxi, Mississippi.
U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin speaks to Ukrainian soldiers training on switchblade drones in Biloxi, Mississippi before they return today to defend their country pic.twitter.com/awUaoySgeH — Lucas Tomlinson (@LucasFoxNews) April 10, 2022
Citing a French intelligence source, Malbrunot also tweeted that British SAS units “have been present in Ukraine since the beginning of the war, as did the American Deltas.”
Russia is apparently well aware of the “secret war” being waged in Ukraine by foreign commandos who have been in the region since February.
Both the United States and the UK have publicly asserted that there won’t be “boots on the ground” in Ukraine, but apparently there has been a US-UK military presence since the start of the war.
“Polls showed in the run up to the war the overwhelming majority of Americans wanted our government to stay out of it but our leaders know best and are more than happy to risk World War III in defense of Ukraine’s puppet regime,” writes Chris Menahan.
Reference: Summit.news