humansarefree--2020-07-22--Dr. Fauci Says ‘Individual Institutions’ May Make The Coronavirus Vaccine Mandatory

Dr. Anthony Fauci recently explained that the US “ could see individual institutions mandating a vaccine.
” As of now , it seems quite clear that this vaccine will not be mandatory , but what seems to be the case is that health authorities may make it mandatory to travel , and individual institutions that employ people , for example , may make it mandatory as well .
Who really knows at this point .
We do seem to be trending in that direction though , perhaps we won ’ t be if a majority of people simply don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ always comply with that which does not resonate ?
Why do we give away our consciousness and allow our perception to be molded by a small group of powerful people ?
One thing is for certain , wherever a vaccine mandate pops up there will be a tremendous amount of controversy .
Fauci told CNN last month that vaccine education efforts in the US is “ not going to be easy ” and went on to say that “ there is a general anti-science , anti-authority , anti-vaccine feeling among some people in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of people , relatively speaking.
” He went on to say that “ we have a lot of work to do ” with regards to educating people “ on the truth about vaccines.
” This type of “ education ” seems to be the censoring of any information , no matter how credible , that paints vaccines in a questionable light .
It also seems to be complemented by a massive campaign of ridicule , as Fauci did above .
How can a number of scientists and doctors who support informed consent and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Perhaps skepticism about vaccines is growing because people are becoming educated ?
Is this why we now have a digital authoritarian Orwellian fact-checker patrolling the internet ?
Should people not be able to examine information and evidence from other experts and decide for themselves what is instead of having a “ fact-checker ” it for them ?
When Bill Gates said that the world won ’ t go back to completely normal until we get a vaccine , his Instagram feed was littered with comments from people who oppose vaccines .
This is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that continues to grow among people , physicians and scientists .
This point was recently emphasized at the World Health Organization ’ s summit on vaccine safety .
Multiple studies suggest that this hesitancy is a result of not only faulty products that have caused injury , but also a lack of trust in pharmaceutical companies .
Furthermore , multiple studies call into question vaccine safety , and the need for more appropriate safety testing .
Take aluminum , for example , it ’ s been added to vaccines for more than 100 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ presumed safe .
Studies have not been conducted to actually prove that it ’ s safe .
There are still many unanswered questions with regards to where these metals end up in our body after they are injected .
Studies are already showing that injected aluminum doesn ’ t exit the body like the aluminum we take in from food , for example , and that the substance may end up in distant organs and eventually lodged within the brain .
( source ) , ( source ) , ( source ) , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ search of the FDA Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System ( VAERS ) database , as of 2/5/19 , the cumulative raw count of adverse events from measles , mumps , and rubella vaccines alone was : 93,929 adverse events , 1,810 disabilities , 6,902 hospitalizations , and 463 deaths .
The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act has paid out approximately $ 4 billion to compensate families of vaccine-injured children .
As astronomical as the monetary awards are , they ’ re even more alarming considering HHS claims that only an estimated 1 % @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System ( VAERS ) .
This act has already paid 4 billion dollars to families of vaccine injured children has now been paid to families of vaccine injured makes it quite clear that vaccines are not a one size fits all product , and injuries could be happening at a far greater rate than what we have been told , as emphasized above .
These concerns aren ’ t even the tip of the ice-berg , and it ’ s a shame that , in today ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccines in a credible , scientific way are often ridiculed rather than countered in a peaceful manner .
This is usually the result of mainstream media also ridiculing the idea of questioning vaccine safety .
Why are the points made by vaccine safety advocates never addressed ?
Why are they simply met with ridicule ?
One of the biggest problems we have to day with regards to science is the politicization of it .
And one of the biggest problems we have with regards to health is the amount of fraud that plagues @ @ @ @ @ @ @ agencies have been completely corrupted , and there are countless amounts of examples that prove this , like the Spider Papers , among many others .
Some people have accused Fauci of this , with his connections to bill gates , the Pharmaceutical company Moderna who seems to be winning the race for the vaccine , and his position as the Director .
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases .

by Jim Hoft
FOX News host Steve Hilton opened his Sunday night show with startling development on the origins of the coronavirus.
Hilton discussed the Gain-of-Function research that helps define the fundamental nature of human-pathogen interactions. One of the greatest laboratories researching Gain-of-Function science was the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China.
Gain-of-Function research is highly controversial. In 2014 the Obama Administration cut funding to the risky biological study.
The government made the decision following biosafety incidents at federal research laboratories.
The Gateway Pundit previously reported that the Obama administration later gave $3.7 million to the Wuhan Institute of Virology after the US program was shut down.
Steve Hilton reported on Sunday that Dr. Anthony Fauci is on record cheering research where potentially dangerous viruses are generated in the lab:

In his Sunday report Steve Hilton revealed how Dr. Fauci gave funding to the projects that resulted in the coronavirus pandemic.
This is a very damning segment by Steve Hilton on FOX News.


humansarefree--2020-07-23--The Technocratic Coup is Advancing Rapidly – Is this the America You Want?

Do you know what “ technocracy ” means ?
If not , it is time you learn about it , because we are currently going through what technocracy expert Patrick Wood says is a Coup D ’ état as the technocrats take over the world , literally .
Mr. Wood was interviewed this week by Spiro Skouras of Activist Post , and he stated : The whole world right now is laboring under the same issues that we are laboring in our country .
That is , the Great Panic of 2020… The technocrats who are pushing technocracy globally have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the entire planet .
And in the process , they have shut down the entire global economic system .
Around the world people in other countries are looking to America to save the world… .
and it ’ s not going to be our government that does it , it ’ s the American citizens like you and me… .
Technocracy is not all that new , and has been around since the 1930s here in the U.S .
In their publication The Technocrat published in 1938 , they defined “ technocracy ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population of this continent .
Mr. Wood explains that technocracy was not developed as a political structure .
It was not a political system .
They hated politicians .
They wanted to do away with the entire political structure , and simply manage the economy .
They wanted to do it using what they call this “ science of social engineering.
” Mr. Wood gives some examples of contemporary technocrats who are involved in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : • Robert McNamara , the Secretary of Defense during the Vietnam war These people are not communists .
They ’ re not socialists , and they ’ re not Marxists .
They ’ re technocrats ( who believe in social engineering ) .
The goals of the technocrats today are embodied in the United Nations ’ s “ sustainable development ” goals and part of the New World Order agenda , which is primarily an economic system , and not a political system .
Both Spiro and Mr. Wood made reference to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the end of his 8 years in office , on January 17 , 1961 , where he warned about the danger of the technocrats .
One quote : Today , the solitary inventor tinkering in his shop has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists .
In laboratories and testing fields in the same fashion , the free university , historically the fountain head of free ideas and scientific discovery , has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research .
Partly because of the huge cost of research , a government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ curiosity .
For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers .
The prospect of domination of the nation ’ s scholars by federal employment , project allocations , and the power of money is ever present , and is greatly to be regarded .
Yet in holding scientific research and discovery in respect , as we should , we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific technological elite .
Mr. Wood elaborates on the fact @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an economic system , and not a political system .
They want a “ Scientific Dictatorship.
” This was the driving force behind the eugenics movement in the U.S. during the 1930s and 1940s , and led to forced sterilization laws being imposed on “ genetically inferior ” women the technocrats did not want to continue breeding .
This is a result of social engineering by the technocrats .
I still see this at the United Nations today , and I still see it whenever Bill Gates speaks anywhere , they look at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a giant feed lot where all of your food is pre-mixed , and you ’ re force-fed , and you get shots with this thing , and that thing , and you get branded and you get pushed to this corral and pushed to that corral .
This is social engineering in their mind .
This is just a continuation of what ’ s been going on for almost a hundred years .
They just don ’ t care about individual human life .
Patrick Wood does offer some solutions .
He founded @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Speech , ” as he believes the first thing that has to go to abolish the Constitution of the United States is to abolish the First Amendment , and free speech .
This is already being suppressed by the technocrats and their social media platforms , as even Google Search results now are geared towards their world view only .
He believes that face mask and social distancing orders are an attack on the First Amendment , and members of his Citizens for Free Speech organization are wearing small placards that look like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ People are coming to us by the thousands every month.
” Mr. Wood ’ s Technocracy News and Trends website , which also hosts his books , is found here .

by Brian Shilhavy
Do you know what “technocracy” means? If not, it is time you learn about it, because we are currently going through what technocracy expert Patrick Wood says is a Coup D’état as the technocrats take over the world, literally.
Mr. Wood was interviewed this week by Spiro Skouras of Activist Post, and he stated:
The whole world right now is laboring under the same issues that we are laboring in our country. That is, the Great Panic of 2020…
The technocrats who are pushing technocracy globally have finally succeeded in springing the trap on the entire planet.
And in the process, they have shut down the entire global economic system.
Around the world people in other countries are looking to America to save the world…. and it’s not going to be our government that does it, it’s the American citizens like you and me….
Technocracy is not all that new, and has been around since the 1930s here in the U.S.
In their publication The Technocrat published in 1938, they defined “technocracy” as:
the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population of this continent.
Mr. Wood explains that technocracy was not developed as a political structure.
It was not a political system. They hated politicians. They wanted to do away with the entire political structure, and simply manage the economy.
They wanted to do it using what they call this “science of social engineering.”
Mr. Wood gives some examples of contemporary technocrats who are involved in the “science of social engineering”:
Wood says:
These people are not communists. They’re not socialists, and they’re not Marxists. They’re technocrats (who believe in social engineering).
The goals of the technocrats today are embodied in the United Nations’s “sustainable development” goals and part of the New World Order agenda, which is primarily an economic system, and not a political system.
Both Spiro and Mr. Wood made reference to President Dwight Eisenhower’s farewell speech at the end of his 8 years in office, on January 17, 1961, where he warned about the danger of the technocrats. One quote:
Today, the solitary inventor tinkering in his shop has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists.
In laboratories and testing fields in the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountain head of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research.
Partly because of the huge cost of research, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity.
For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers. The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present, and is greatly to be regarded.
Yet in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific technological elite.
Watch the full speech:
Mr. Wood elaborates on the fact that the goal of the technocrats is an economic system, and not a political system. They want a “Scientific Dictatorship.”
This was the driving force behind the eugenics movement in the U.S. during the 1930s and 1940s, and led to forced sterilization laws being imposed on “genetically inferior” women the technocrats did not want to continue breeding.
This is a result of social engineering by the technocrats.
I still see this at the United Nations today, and I still see it whenever Billy Boy speaks anywhere, they look at you and I as cattle steers in a giant feed lot where all of your food is pre-mixed, and you’re force-fed, and you get shots with this thing, and that thing, and you get branded and you get pushed to this corral and pushed to that corral.
This is social engineering in their mind. This is just a continuation of what’s been going on for almost a hundred years.
They just don’t care about individual human life.
Patrick Wood does offer some solutions. He founded a website called “Citizens for Free Speech,” as he believes the first thing that has to go to abolish the Constitution of the United States is to abolish the First Amendment, and free speech.
This is already being suppressed by the technocrats and their social media platforms, as even Google Search results now are geared towards their world view only.
He believes that face mask and social distancing orders are an attack on the First Amendment, and members of his Citizens for Free Speech organization are wearing small placards that look like this to protest wearing a mask:
“People are coming to us by the thousands every month.”
Mr. Wood’s Technocracy News and Trends website, which also hosts his books, is found here.


humansarefree--2020-07-23--About Those Spooky Federal Cops in Portland

Dear Portlandia progressives : a federal government big enough to take care of you is a federal government big enough to “ take care of you.
” Scary unidentifiable police , federal black sites , and procedureless snatching of individuals from the streets are the wholly predictable and natural consequences of the very policies you advocated for decades .
Why do you imagine a big government with lots of power will restrict itself to the cozy “ social issues ” and economic takings you support ?
Government can seize the means of production , but not seize you ?
You @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you got what you wanted .
Plus you certainly would be every bit as outraged if federal agents concerned about the undermining of America surreptitiously snatched up a few “ white supremacists , ” right ?
Progressives of all parties have cheered the relentless centralization of state matters — and the rejection of Tenth Amendment — for nearly 150 years .
The shaky and infirm Incorporation Doctrine federalized the Bill of Rights , the Supreme Court federalized social and economic issues , and the the alphabet soup of federal agencies created by progressive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ policy was ripped away from Congress and commandeered by bureaucratic Deep State actors at the DOD , CIA , NSA , and the State Department .
Thousands of new federal crimes were created by statute .
These statutes in turn created a vast federal police state , one heavily influenced and provisioned by the residual weaponry and machinery of our overseas wars .
So now you wonder why the Feds are sent in to quell an uprising in Portland ?
Who wanted to make the world safe for democracy ?
Remember Woodrow Wilson @ @ @ @ @ @ @ racism ?
At least Truman had the honesty to admit regrets about creating the CIA .
Who wanted federal control over the retrograde Southern states ?
Who dismissed the Ninth and Tenth Amendments as relics ?
Who derided states ’ rights and nullification as legal cover for bigotry ?
And for the millionth time , “ states ’ rights ” does not mean states have “ rights ” relative to their citizens ; it refers to their retained powers in a federal system — so enough with the dishonest smears .
Who shrugged @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that matter ?
At this writing , federal agents operating in the City of Roses appear to be from the Department of Homeland Security ( sic ) .
Here is what Ron Paul , a true man of peace yet despised by progressives , had to say back in 2002 , shortly after the DHS was created with overwhelming support in Congress : The Homeland Security department , like all federal agencies , will increase in size exponentially over the coming decades .
Its budget , number of employees , and the scope @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has no idea what it will have created twenty or fifty years hence , when less popular presidents have the full power of a domestic spying agency at their disposal .
The frightening details of the Homeland Security bill , which authorizes an unprecedented level of warrantless spying on American citizens , are still emerging .
Those who still care about the Bill of Rights , particularly the 4th amendment , have every reason to be alarmed .
But the process by which Congress created the bill is every bit as reprehensible as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Security bill did receive some opposition from the President ’ s critics .
Yet did they attack the legislation because it threatens to debase the 4th amendment and create an Orwellian surveillance society ?
Did they attack it because it will chill political dissent or expand the drug war ?
No , they attacked it on the grounds that it failed to secure enough high-paying federal union jobs , thus angering one of Washington ’ s most powerful special interest groups .
Ultimately , however , even the most prominent critics voted for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was scorned and attacked by progressives of all parties in the early 2000s for labeling the Bush/Ashcroft/Yoo junta as a “ police state.
” He was dismissed for opposing TSA at the airport , for opposing FISA warrants , for his Fourth Amendment absolutism , and especially for warning how American forays in the Middle East would come home in a multitude of ways .
Constitutionally , there are only three federal crimes : treason , piracy , and counterfeiting .
No standing federal police agencies or apparatus are required to enforce these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be the express policy of our central bank .
There should not be federal agents , overt or covert , in Portland .
The riots taking place there are criminal matters for local authorities and local authorities alone .
If residents and local politicians prefer to give the mob freedom to run amok over both public ( taxpayer ) and private property , while also threatening the physical safety of ordinary citizens , Uncle Sam has nothing to say about it .
But the same people who demanded endless growth in the federal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more circumspect today .
A cynic might call them hypocrites .

Dear Portlandia progressives: a federal government big enough to take care of you is a federal government big enough to “take care of you.”
Scary unidentifiable police, federal black sites, and procedureless snatching of individuals from the streets are the wholly predictable and natural consequences of the very policies you advocated for decades.
Why do you imagine a big government with lots of power will restrict itself to the cozy “social issues” and economic takings you support? Government can seize the means of production, but not seize you?
You wanted everything run from DC, and you got what you wanted.
Plus you certainly would be every bit as outraged if federal agents concerned about the undermining of America surreptitiously snatched up a few “white supremacists,” right?
Progressives of all parties have cheered the relentless centralization of state matters — and the rejection of Tenth Amendment — for nearly 150 years.
The shaky and infirm Incorporation Doctrine federalized the Bill of Rights, the Supreme Court federalized social and economic issues, and the the alphabet soup of federal agencies created by progressive administrations federalized the regulatory state.
Foreign policy was ripped away from Congress and commandeered by bureaucratic Deep State actors at the DOD, CIA, NSA, and the State Department.
Thousands of new federal crimes were created by statute. These statutes in turn created a vast federal police state, one heavily influenced and provisioned by the residual weaponry and machinery of our overseas wars.
So now you wonder why the Feds are sent in to quell an uprising in Portland?
Who wanted to make the world safe for democracy? Remember Woodrow Wilson, suddenly a bad guy because of racism? At least Truman had the honesty to admit regrets about creating the CIA.
Who wanted federal control over the retrograde Southern states? Who dismissed the Ninth and Tenth Amendments as relics? Who derided states’ rights and nullification as legal cover for bigotry?
And for the millionth time, “states’ rights” does not mean states have “rights” relative to their citizens; it refers to their retained powers in a federal system — so enough with the dishonest smears.
Who shrugged at Waco and Guantanamo Bay, for that matter?
At this writing, federal agents operating in the City of Roses appear to be from the Department of Homeland Security (sic). Here is what Ron Paul, a true man of peace yet despised by progressives, had to say back in 2002, shortly after the DHS was created with overwhelming support in Congress:
The Homeland Security department, like all federal agencies, will increase in size exponentially over the coming decades. Its budget, number of employees, and the scope of its mission will EXPAND.
Congress has no idea what it will have created twenty or fifty years hence, when less popular presidents have the full power of a domestic spying agency at their disposal. The frightening details of the Homeland Security bill, which authorizes an unprecedented level of warrantless spying on American citizens, are still emerging.
Those who still care about the Bill of Rights, particularly the 4th amendment, have every reason to be alarmed. But the process by which Congress created the bill is every bit as reprehensible as its contents.
Of course the Homeland Security bill did receive some opposition from the President’s critics.
Yet did they attack the legislation because it threatens to debase the 4th amendment and create an Orwellian surveillance society? Did they attack it because it will chill political dissent or expand the drug war?
No, they attacked it on the grounds that it failed to secure enough high-paying federal union jobs, thus angering one of Washington’s most powerful special interest groups. Ultimately, however, even the most prominent critics voted for the bill.
Similarly, Dr. Paul was scorned and attacked by progressives of all parties in the early 2000s for labeling the Bush/Ashcroft/Yoo junta as a “police state.”
He was dismissed for opposing TSA at the airport, for opposing FISA warrants, for his Fourth Amendment absolutism, and especially for warning how American forays in the Middle East would come home in a multitude of ways.
Constitutionally, there are only three federal crimes: treason, piracy, and counterfeiting. No standing federal police agencies or apparatus are required to enforce these; in fact the latter appears to be the express policy of our central bank.
There should not be federal agents, overt or covert, in Portland. The riots taking place there are criminal matters for local authorities and local authorities alone.
If residents and local politicians prefer to give the mob freedom to run amok over both public (taxpayer) and private property, while also threatening the physical safety of ordinary citizens, Uncle Sam has nothing to say about it.
But the same people who demanded endless growth in the federal police and regulatory state ought to be more circumspect today. A cynic might call them hypocrites.
Source: Mises.org


humansarefree--2020-07-23--US National Library of Medicine Study: 5G Technology and Induction of Coronavirus in Skin Cells

The implications of this study are absolutely huge : In this research , we show that 5G millimeter waves could @ @ @ @ @ acting like antennas , transferred to other cells and play the main role in producing @ @ @ @ @ DNA is built from charged electrons and atoms and has an inductor-like structure .
This @ @ @ @ @ linear , toroid and round inductors .
Inductors interact with external electromagnetic waves , move @ @ @ @ @ within the cells .
The shapes of these waves are similar to shapes of hexagonal @ @ @ @ @ DNA source .
These waves produce some holes in liquids within the nucleus .
To @ @ @ @ @ extra hexagonal and pentagonal bases are produced .
These bases could join to each other @ @ @ @ @ as Coronavirus .
To produce these viruses within a cell , it is necessary that @ @ @ @ @ be shorter than the size of the cell .
Thus 5G millimeter waves could be @ @ @ @ @ constructing virus-like structures such as Coronaviruses ( COVID-19 ) within cells .

It seems like only yesterday. Americans were denied the right to go to their churches. They were denied the right to visit their loved ones in the hospital.
by Ron Paul
They were denied the right to open their businesses and go to work to provide for themselves and their families. They were denied the right to go to restaurants, to bars, to hair salons.
No laws were passed denying these rights. Even that would be illegal and immoral. But what happened was worse.
They were denied these basic rights by governors, county judges, and even local mayors who used the coronavirus outbreak as an excuse to rule by decree.
They stole power that was not theirs to take and wielded it at all levels to force America into three months of house arrest.
Then, in the midst of stay-at-home orders across the country, the same governors and local officials who locked Americans in their homes suddenly came around with their keys and threw open the doors. Suddenly not only was it OK to go out into the street, it was required to go out into the street!
What happened? A cure? A miraculous jjab? No. The officials who locked Americans up found a cause they felt required Americans in the streets to protest.
Police had killed a black man, George Floyd, in their custody in Minneapolis and suddenly the need to protest trumped the need to “stay home, save lives.”
Suddenly the same health “experts” who told us we must not gather in crowds or there will be death in the millions from coronavirus issued statements supporting gathering in crowds.
An open letter on the George Floyd protests signed by more than 1,200 doctors and other health professionals clarified that they “do not condemn these gatherings as risky for Covid-19 transmission.”
However, they wrote, “this should not be confused with a permissive stance on all gatherings, particularly protests against stay-at-home orders.”
Did the coronavirus develop some kind of superior intelligence enabling it to distinguish between those who were congregating for a “good cause” and those who were congregating for a “bad cause”? Of course not.
What has happened from the beginning of this shameful coronavirus episode is the politicization of public health at the hands of authoritarians.
Two prestigious medical journals, The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine, were forced to retract studies they had published concluding that Hydroxychloroquine was harmful to Covid patients.
The rush to print the studies looks very much like a political move rather than one based on scientific principles.
Once President Trump revealed that he was taking hydroxychloroquine the mainstream media and even “expert” journals began attacking the drug.
This is what happens when medicine merges with the state. We get the worst of both. We get career bureaucrat Dr. Fauci telling us we can never shake hands again and that we must stay home until a jjab is found.
Meanwhile, doctors across the globe are reporting that this variation of the coronavirus is disappearing on its own.
We have a tradition of separation of church and state in the United States for good reason. The merger of state and church invites oppression and corruption.
We need to adopt this same approach to medicine and the state. We now see how this merger has produced the same kind of widespread tyranny and corruption.


humansarefree--2020-07-23--California Apartment Building Locked Down – Key Cards Deactivated, Security Guards Posted at Entranc

California Apartment Building Locked Down – Key Cards Deactivated, Security Guards Posted at Entrances

Residents of an apartment building in Ventura , California , found themselves prisoners in their own homes as they were “ locked down ” in their own apartment building and subjected to mandatory covid-19 testing and quarantine restrictions .
Natural News has acquired a letter that was sent by the property manager to all 78 residents of the 7-story apartment building , which is located at 137 S. Palm Street in the City of Ventura , California .
The building caters to seniors and disabled residents and is government-subsidized housing .
We have confirmed the authenticity of this letter , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ redactions to protect the names of the property managers who are being subjected to threats .
The letter warns that all residents of the building are ordered to appear at the “ Palms Community Room ” to participate in mandatory testing for covid-19 on July 17 , 2020 ( last Friday ) .
“ All residents residing at 137 S. Palm MUST be tested for the Covid-19 virus .
After testing has been completed , all residents MUST QUARANTINE in their unit until test results are received.
” In other words , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to subject themselves to covid-19 tests against their will , and then were essentially held prisoner in their apartments .
The letter continues , “ Effectively immediately , the Palms building has been placed on lockdown.
” The letter further explains , “ Except for essential workers , no one will be able to enter or exit the building during the lockdown.
” In addition , “ Security personnel will be posted on all entrances of the building 24 hours 7 days a week , ” the letter says .
“ All resident @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lockout.
” In essence , 78 American citizens were imprisoned in their own apartment building in Ventura , California in a China-style “ medical prisoner ” crackdown scenario .
However , there is more to this story , and it also involves Ventura County , which actually initiated this lockdown ( see below ) .
Here ’ s the full letter , with the names and phone numbers of the property managers blacked out .
We are withholding the name of the property manager who signed this letter because she is reportedly being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people .
Once you read the letter she sent to building occupants , you might also experience anger and frustration .
However , we do not condone any threats or aggressiveness toward the building manager , and we are asking our readers to direct their frustration at county authorities , not the building managers .
One resident called the police and declared he had been kidnapped According to local sources , the letter was distributed to building residents in parallel with the County of Ventura declaring the building to be under a quarantine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this notice from the Ventura County Public Health agency was received on Friday , July 17th , at 6pm , and it described an enforced “ mandatory quarantine ” for the entire building .
( It appears the enforcement order came from the County of Ventura ) .
The property manager had been working to alert the residents of the building to the fact that Ventura was about to demand the quarantine lockdown status until all building occupants were forced into mandatory covid-19 testing .
One resident reportedly became so frustrated that he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had been kidnapped and was being held against his will .
Ventura County rescinded the mandatory quarantine order on Tuesday , July 21st , after the mandatory test results were received .
Four residents out of 78 tested positive for covid-19 , according to the test results .
Those four individuals are being ordered to self-quarantine for 14 days and are being monitored by the Public Health department of Ventura County .
Ventura county was initially alerted to the building by one resident testing positive during routine intake testing at the hospital .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ patient and their home address , which the county then linked to all the other residents in the same building .
It appears this led the county to ultimately demand the quarantine lockdown .
It is important to note that the building property managers did not initiate this quarantine lockdown .
That was done by Ventura County , it appears .
The property managers were merely alerting residents to what Ventura County had communicated .
It seems likely the property managers could have done a better job of explaining this in their letter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the backlash they are now experiencing .
What this confirmed incident reveals is that at least one major county in California is now resorting to China-style tactics that smack of medical tyranny and violations of fundamental human rights .
It appears that residents at 137 S. Palm Street were , in fact , held as prisoners in their own homes , denied the ability to leave the building and forced into mandatory testing against their will .
In effect , the building became a kind of mini-FEMA camp for about four days , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ apparently had few rights .
We are told that building property managers organized call-in checks to make sure every resident was called each morning to see if they had any urgent needs that weren ’ t being met ( such as food , medical supplies , etc. )
.
It ’ s not clear who , exactly , was involved in making these check-up calls .
All this begs the question , though : Since when did the residents at this building sign any document waiving their constitutional rights as Americans ?
Under @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in their own homes and ordered to subject themselves to flawed medical tests that may cause them irreparable financial harm and health harm if the results are incorrect ?
Merely testing positive for covid-19 can result in people being subjected to lockdowns , job discrimination , social discrimination and long-term medical hassles merely for having a covid-19 “ positive ” test result on their record .
In the building mentioned here , 74 out of 78 residents tested negative , yet they were subjected to medical tyranny lockdowns and mandatory tests nonetheless .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the results are false — may also be subjected to hundreds of thousands of dollars in medical costs even when they never had covid-19 in the first place , and if they are unlucky enough to be placed on a ventilator , that may even be killed by doctors and hospitals who collect extra funds for each covid-19 death they experience .
That this sort of draconian lockdown is now happening in the United States of America is a stark warning for all Americans : None of us are safe while the covid-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is spinning out of control across America All across America , we are now seeing gross abuses of power , with one couple now subjected to house arrest and prisoner-style ankle bracelets for merely refusing to sign draconian social distancing “ consent decree ” documents .
It also begs a bigger question about the right to self-defense .
If you are kidnapped by the government and made a prisoner in your own home against your will , and forced into medical experiments or testing against your will , do you not have the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ acts of aggression using all legal tools that might be available ?
Could a resident who is kidnapped and imprisoned against his will rightfully decide to pick up his rifle and literally shoot his way to freedom to escape his captors ?
Mass media hysteria is conspiring to deprive Americans of their fundamental freedoms Must Americans now surrender all their rights to the tyranny of the state merely because the left-wing media wishes to push never-ending hysteria about a pandemic that we now know can be prevented with vitamin D and very successfully @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we now watching the creepy line of medical tyranny shift from mask mandates to at-home prison sentencing even for those who agree to comply with all the demands of the state ?
These are questions that desperately need to be answered with courage by people of principle .
If we do not have the right to control our own bodies , homes and personal mobility , then we are not free people at all .
We are slaves to a fraudulent , deceptive medical regime that respects nothing except the profits to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ being marketed with covid-19 mass hysteria .
Now in 2020 , human beings are simply exploited as pawns to ratchet up the hysteria to unprecedented levels , in complete contradiction to the fact that we now know how to halt the pandemic and cure most of those who are infected .
We have the answers , but the answers are being systematically censored by Google , Facebook , YouTube and Twitter , all conforming to the obedience demands of the corrupt CDC and the Fauci-like drug cartel profiteers who stand to pocket hundreds @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if they can just keep the panic aloft a little longer .
The people are nothing but useful idiot pawns in all this , from the point of view of the Big Pharma controllers who now run the media , the science journals , the CDC and the FDA .
To them , human rights don ’ t matter .
Even sacrificing human beings as guinea pigs is of no consequence to these Big Pharma monsters .
They care about nothing except using fear to generate revenue .
And if entire buildings full @ @ @ @ @ @ @ down to achieve their profit goals , then so be it .
As I have repeatedly warned for literally the last 20 years — during which I have been incessantly censored , smeared and attacked — America has now descended into a “ pharma state ” that ’ s almost entirely run by Big Pharma profit interests .
All institutions in America — science , medicine , legislation , taxation , regulators , education , media and more — now cater almost entirely to the profit interests of the drug and vaccine manufacturers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this nation is coordinated to achieve a singular goal : Maximum profits for Big Pharma at any cost , including the deliberate sacrificing of potentially millions of lives , if necessary , in order to maintain the death counts , hospitalization rates and never-ending fear that drives the vaccine drug cartels .
This is why entire buildings full of Americans are being locked down .
It ’ s not about stopping a virus ; it ’ s about maintaining the necessary level of medical terror to maximize vaccine profits in the months ahead @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Big Pharma .
Science be damned .
Human freedom be damned .
Rationality be damned .
They will do whatever it takes to keep you living in fear and nutritional ignorance so that no one has access to cures that work , forcing everyone to be corralled into the Big Pharma trap of vaccines and mass medication , even while readily available cures already exist ( and cost merely pennies per dose ) .
We are all now living under a criminal cartel of fake science medicine that recognizes no value whatsoever in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
To the pharma criminals , you are nothing but a walking dollar sign , a biological cash machine that they can convert into money by keeping as many people as possible infected , hospitalized and fearful .
All those who speak of cures are silenced via a conspiracy of censorship .
Any legitimate solutions for humanity are attacked with a kind of quack science fanaticism that has already swept across The Lancet , the New England Journal of Medicine and even Nature science journals .
Big Pharma is now the enemy of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of defeated and destroyed , humanity will never be free from pandemics , biological weapons , mandatory vaccines and wave after wave of engineered fear .
Because they will never stop terrorizing us all , as it works so well to fill their pockets with easy cash .
Perhaps it ’ s time we quarantined Big Pharma so they can no longer terrorize the rest of us with fake science and quack medicine .
Maybe it ’ s time to flatten the fraud and end the pharma fear campaigns once and for all @

Residents of an apartment building in Ventura, California, found themselves prisoners in their own homes as they were “locked down” in their own apartment building and subjected to mandatory covid-19 testing and quarantine restrictions.
by Mike Adams
Natural News has acquired a letter that was sent by the property manager to all 78 residents of the 7-story apartment building, which is located at 137 S. Palm Street in the City of Ventura, California.
The building caters to seniors and disabled residents and is government-subsidized housing.
We have confirmed the authenticity of this letter, which is shown below, with certain redactions to protect the names of the property managers who are being subjected to threats.
The letter warns that all residents of the building are ordered to appear at the “Palms Community Room” to participate in mandatory testing for covid-19 on July 17, 2020 (last Friday).
It states,
“All residents residing at 137 S. Palm MUST be tested for the Covid-19 virus. After testing has been completed, all residents MUST QUARANTINE in their unit until test results are received.”
In other words, the 78 residents of the building were ordered to subject themselves to covid-19 tests against their will, and then were essentially held prisoner in their apartments.
The letter continues, “Effectively immediately, the Palms building has been placed on lockdown.”
The letter further explains, “Except for essential workers, no one will be able to enter or exit the building during the lockdown.”
In addition, “Security personnel will be posted on all entrances of the building 24 hours 7 days a week,” the letter says. “All resident card keys will be deactivated during the lockout.”
In essence, 78 American citizens were imprisoned in their own apartment building in Ventura, California in a China-style “medical prisoner” crackdown scenario.
However, there is more to this story, and it also involves Ventura County, which actually initiated this lockdown (see below).
Here’s the full letter, with the names and phone numbers of the property managers blacked out. We are withholding the name of the property manager who signed this letter because she is reportedly being hit with aggressive threats from many angry people.
Once you read the letter she sent to building occupants, you might also experience anger and frustration.
However, we do not condone any threats or aggressiveness toward the building manager, and we are asking our readers to direct their frustration at county authorities, not the building managers.
One resident called the police and declared he had been kidnapped
According to local sources, the letter was distributed to building residents in parallel with the County of Ventura declaring the building to be under a quarantine lockdown.
According to local sources, this notice from the Ventura County Public Health agency was received on Friday, July 17th, at 6pm, and it described an enforced “mandatory quarantine” for the entire building.
(It appears the enforcement order came from the County of Ventura).
The property manager had been working to alert the residents of the building to the fact that Ventura was about to demand the quarantine lockdown status until all building occupants were forced into mandatory covid-19 testing.
One resident reportedly became so frustrated that he called the police and declared that he had been kidnapped and was being held against his will.
Ventura County rescinded the mandatory quarantine order on Tuesday, July 21st, after the mandatory test results were received. Four residents out of 78 tested positive for covid-19, according to the test results.
Those four individuals are being ordered to self-quarantine for 14 days and are being monitored by the Public Health department of Ventura County.
Ventura county was initially alerted to the building by one resident testing positive during routine intake testing at the hospital.
Ventura County was then notified of that patient and their home address, which the county then linked to all the other residents in the same building. It appears this led the county to ultimately demand the quarantine lockdown.
It is important to note that the building property managers did not initiate this quarantine lockdown. That was done by Ventura County, it appears. The property managers were merely alerting residents to what Ventura County had communicated.
It seems likely the property managers could have done a better job of explaining this in their letter, however, possibly avoiding some of the backlash they are now experiencing.
California now resorting to China-style “mass house arrest” tactics
What this confirmed incident reveals is that at least one major county in California is now resorting to China-style tactics that smack of medical tyranny and violations of fundamental human rights.
It appears that residents at 137 S. Palm Street were, in fact, held as prisoners in their own homes, denied the ability to leave the building and forced into mandatory testing against their will.
In effect, the building became a kind of mini-FEMA camp for about four days, during which the residents of the building apparently had few rights.
We are told that building property managers organized call-in checks to make sure every resident was called each morning to see if they had any urgent needs that weren’t being met (such as food, medical supplies, etc.).
It’s not clear who, exactly, was involved in making these check-up calls.
All this begs the question, though: Since when did the residents at this building sign any document waiving their constitutional rights as Americans?
Under what authority are people now held prisoner in their own homes and ordered to subject themselves to flawed medical tests that may cause them irreparable financial harm and health harm if the results are incorrect?
Merely testing positive for covid-19 can result in people being subjected to lockdowns, job discrimination, social discrimination and long-term medical hassles merely for having a covid-19 “positive” test result on their record.
In the building mentioned here, 74 out of 78 residents tested negative, yet they were subjected to medical tyranny lockdowns and mandatory tests nonetheless.
People who test positive — even if the results are false — may also be subjected to hundreds of thousands of dollars in medical costs even when they never had covid-19 in the first place, and if they are unlucky enough to be placed on a ventilator, that may even be killed by doctors and hospitals who collect extra funds for each covid-19 death they experience.
That this sort of draconian lockdown is now happening in the United States of America is a stark warning for all Americans: None of us are safe while the covid-19 tyrants are in power.
Medical tyranny is spinning out of control across America
All across America, we are now seeing gross abuses of power, with one couple now subjected to house arrest and prisoner-style ankle bracelets for merely refusing to sign draconian social distancing “consent decree” documents.
(By what law does the government now force private citizens to sign illegal documents that deprive people of their rights?)
It also begs a bigger question about the right to self-defense.
If you are kidnapped by the government and made a prisoner in your own home against your will, and forced into medical experiments or testing against your will, do you not have the right to defend your life against such acts of aggression using all legal tools that might be available?
Could a resident who is kidnapped and imprisoned against his will rightfully decide to pick up his rifle and literally shoot his way to freedom to escape his captors?
Mass media hysteria is conspiring to deprive Americans of their fundamental freedoms
Must Americans now surrender all their rights to the tyranny of the state merely because the left-wing media wishes to push never-ending hysteria about a pandemic that we now know can be prevented with vitamin D and very successfully treated with hydroxychloroquine and zinc?
Are we now watching the creepy line of medical tyranny shift from mask mandates to at-home prison sentencing even for those who agree to comply with all the demands of the state?
These are questions that desperately need to be answered with courage by people of principle. If we do not have the right to control our own bodies, homes and personal mobility, then we are not free people at all.
We are slaves to a fraudulent, deceptive medical regime that respects nothing except the profits to be generated from the jjabs that are already being marketed with covid-19 mass hysteria.
Now in 2020, human beings are simply exploited as pawns to ratchet up the hysteria to unprecedented levels, in complete contradiction to the fact that we now know how to halt the pandemic and cure most of those who are infected.
We have the answers, but the answers are being systematically censored by Google, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter, all conforming to the obedience demands of the corrupt CDC and the Fauci-like drug cartel profiteers who stand to pocket hundreds of billions of dollars in jjab profits if they can just keep the panic aloft a little longer.
The people are nothing but useful idiot pawns in all this, from the point of view of the Big Pharma controllers who now run the media, the science journals, the CDC and the FDA. To them, human rights don’t matter.
Individual liberty is irrelevant.
Even sacrificing human beings as guinea pigs is of no consequence to these Big Pharma monsters. They care about nothing except using fear to generate revenue. And if entire buildings full of innocent people have to be locked down to achieve their profit goals, then so be it.
America has descended into a “pharma state”
As I have repeatedly warned for literally the last 20 years — during which I have been incessantly censored, smeared and attacked — America has now descended into a “pharma state” that’s almost entirely run by Big Pharma profit interests.
All institutions in America — science, medicine, legislation, taxation, regulators, education, media and more — now cater almost entirely to the profit interests of the drug and jjab manufacturers.
Everything you are seeing unfold in this nation is coordinated to achieve a singular goal:
Maximum profits for Big Pharma at any cost, including the deliberate sacrificing of potentially millions of lives, if necessary, in order to maintain the death counts, hospitalization rates and never-ending fear that drives the jjab drug cartels.
This is why entire buildings full of Americans are being locked down. It’s not about stopping a virus; it’s about maintaining the necessary level of medical terror to maximize jjab profits in the months ahead.
FEAR is the marketing weapon of Big Pharma. Science be damned. Human freedom be damned. Rationality be damned.
They will do whatever it takes to keep you living in fear and nutritional ignorance so that no one has access to cures that work, forcing everyone to be corralled into the Big Pharma trap of jjabs and mass medication, even while readily available cures already exist (and cost merely pennies per dose).
We are all now living under a criminal cartel of fake science medicine that recognizes no value whatsoever in human dignity, freedom or individual choice.
To the pharma criminals, you are nothing but a walking dollar sign, a biological cash machine that they can convert into money by keeping as many people as possible infected, hospitalized and fearful.
All cures are censored.
All those who speak of cures are silenced via a conspiracy of censorship. Any legitimate solutions for humanity are attacked with a kind of quack science fanaticism that has already swept across The Lancet, the New England Journal of Medicine and even Nature science journals.
Big Pharma is now the enemy of humankind. And unless this dangerous enemy of defeated and destroyed, humanity will never be free from pandemics, biological weapons, mandatory jjabs and wave after wave of engineered fear.
Because they will never stop terrorizing us all, as it works so well to fill their pockets with easy cash.
Perhaps it’s time we quarantined Big Pharma so they can no longer terrorize the rest of us with fake science and quack medicine.
Maybe it’s time to flatten the fraud and end the pharma fear campaigns once and for all.


humansarefree--2020-07-24--Physicians for Informed Consent: Infection Fatality Rate of COVID-19 is Just 0.26%

The Physicians For Informed Consent ( PIC ) recently published a report titled “ Physicians for Informed Consent ( PIC ) Compares COVID-19 to Previous Seasonal and Pandemic Flu Periods.
” In their article , they stated the following : “ The public has been made aware of the number of COVID-19 deaths and reported cases that have occurred since the beginning of the current pandemic ; however , the number of unreported cases has not been widely known or publicized .
Recently , the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC ) estimated that more than one-third of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to COVID-19 ) infections are asymptomatic , meaning that initial estimations of its severity were grossly overestimated .
“ Now , for the first time , Physicians for Informed Consent ( PIC ) has collated data from U.S. antibody studies and produced an educational document outlining how an accurate case-fatality rate ( CFR ) requires antibody studies in order to guide and measure medical care and public health policies.
” Similar to CDC estimations , PIC ’ s analysis results in a COVID-19 CFR of 0.26 % , which is comparable to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ periods .
Study After Study After Study : COVID-19 Mortality Rate Is Similar To Seasonal Flu ( So Why The Insanity ? )
“ Knowing the CFR of COVID-19 allows for an objective standard by which to compare both non-pharmaceutical interventions and medical countermeasures , ” said Dr. Shira Miller , PIC ’ s founder and president .
“ For example , safety studies of any potential COVID-19 vaccine should be able to prove whether or not the risks of the vaccine are less than the risks of the infection .
“ Regardless @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a potential COVID-19 vaccine should only be voluntary , in order to safeguard a patient ’ s human right to determine what will happen with his or her body , ” said Dr. Miller .
You can view the PIC ’ s educational document assessing COVID-19 severity and how they came to their conclusion , here .
Obviously the data is always delayed and things are constantly changing with regards to COVID-19 numbers .
Who are the PIC ?
They are a group of doctors and academics from around the world who have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it comes to mandatory vaccine measures .
Their information is based on science .
Their mission is to deliver data on infectious diseases and vaccines , and to unite doctors , scientists , healthcare professionals , attorneys , and families who support voluntary vaccinations .
Their vision is that doctors and the public are able to evaluate the data on infectious diseases and vaccines objectively and voluntarily engage in informed decision-making about vaccination .
They are not the only ones in the ‘ academic world ’ who make the point that COVID-19 perceptions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ For example , John P. A. Ioannidis , a professor of medicine and epidemiology at Stanford University has said that the infection fatality rate is close to 0 percent for people under the age of 45 years old , explaining how that number rises significantly for people who are older , as with most other respiratory viruses .
You can read more about that and access that here .
In fact , not long ago a study published by several academics from the Stanford School of Medicine suggests that COVID-19 has a similar @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you can read more about that and access the study here .
The mainstream media has also addressed the low case fatality rate , warning the public not to be compliant .
Why This Is Important This is important because the data validates what many doctors have been emphasizing from the beginning of the lockdown , that the new coronavirus is being made out to be far more dangerous than it actually is .
This is the opinion of many , not a consensus .
As a result , many scientists were extremely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the measures that multiple governments have taken .
For example , Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi , a specialist in microbiology and one of the most cited research scientists in German history , was one of them .
( source ) There seem to be dozens upon dozens of doctors and scientists raising the same ideas .
Doctors and scientists of such a prestigious background with decades of experience in the field have been censored and silenced by multiple social media platform for sharing their opinion and research , simply because it opposes the narrative @ @ @ @ @ @ @ organizations like the World Health Organization ( WHO ) and the United Nations , for example .
YouTube has flat out said that it ’ s censoring any information that contradicts the WHO .
It ’ s understandable why so many people are confused .
On one hand you have mainstream media outlets reporting an overwhelming amount of dead bodies that have to be carted away in freezer trucks , and on the other hand you have a number of scientists and doctors letting people know that we are dealing something that we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , just another non-severe respiratory virus .
Complimenting that is “ fact checkers ” that are going around blindly upholding the government and health agency narrative .
In reality , they are censoring different perspectives , not fact checking .
Other factors are also confusing , like the fact that deaths are being attributed to Covid that are not a result of it .
Did you know that metapneumovirus has been shown to have worldwide circulation with nearly universal infection by age 5 ?
We are talking billions of people .
Did you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ well documented every single year , especially in long term care facilities with mortality rates of up to 50 % ?
( source ) Did you know that human metapneumovirus infection results in a large number of hospitalizations of children every single year ?
Did you know nearly 1-2 million children every single year die of these types of respiratory illnesses because they lead to acute respiratory illness ?
Imagine if the infection rates and death numbers were constantly tracked , and put on an easy to access website , mainstream media , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and respiratory illnesses that are more severe in some cases , and arguably more infectious in some cases were subjected to constant monitoring and beamed out to the population every single minute , could you imagine the fear and hysteria ?
Are fear and hysteria being used as a marketing tool for a vaccine ?
What about Edward Snowden ’ s thoughts about the under-discussed consequences of the coronavirus pandemic and how it ’ s being used to take away more human rights ?
Here ’ s a recent Instagram post I came @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It makes you wonder , doesn ’ t it ?
Study After Study After Study : COVID-19 Mortality Rate Is Similar To Seasonal Flu ( So Why The Insanity ? )
Right now , and we seem to see the same thing with other major global events , there seems to be a great divide amongst the population with regards to what is going on .
How dangerous is the virus is ?
Are receiving the correct information from not only our federal , state , and provincial health authorities but the WHO @ @ @ @ @ @ @ expressed by the collective reaction to lockdown and other mandated measures that have been put in place .
There are simply a growing number of people who do not agree with the actions governments have taken to combat Covid , and many of them are doctors , scientists , and people who have some sort of expertise in this area .
The point is , we are not obligated to listen to our government .
Although it seems that way sometimes , “ obey or be punished ” , the ultimate power lies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ collective choose what direction we go , and right now many of us are simply choosing to follow , obey , not question , and be wary of the ones who are asking questions .
This is OK , this path is not wrong , but how does it feel to simply follow narratives that you don ’ t know are true ?
Why are so many others questioning and backing up their conclusions with facts ?
What world is created out of blind acceptance of anything ?
Furthermore , the emergence of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the internet that ’ s censoring the opinions and research of some experts in the field simply serves as a catalyst for many to also question what is going on here .
The fact checks , in many cases , become so ridiculous that people are now realizing that the information that is fact checked is often the information to reflect on .
One thing is for certain , the coronavirus has served as a great catalyst for more people to start questioning what they ’ re told , and to seek out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ long time , we haven ’ t really been thinking for ourselves , instead we ’ ve let “ the corporation ” do that for us .
This is why we are seeing the emergence of so much information that continues to contradict what we are being told .
We have so much potential as a human race , and to come closer to accessing that potential , a great step would begin asking deeper and better questions about what we ’ re told .
We can do this by gathering different perspectives @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mainstream media .
Reflect , is participating in our current political process helping us thrive ?
Or are we simply giving our power away to a system that is full of what we call corruption and that doesn ’ t have our best interests at hand ?
Our current system was created from a level of consciousness that we as humans are evolving beyond .
This is why so many are feeling a desire to look for new ideas and ways of seeing things , because our current ways no longer resonate with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them out of habit and unconsciousness .
In order to create a new system , you can ’ t do it from the same level of consciousness we are at now or else we will only create more of the same thing .
If we want change , might we create it when we as individuals operate from a greater sense of awareness and inclusiveness , a higher state of consciousness ?
Might we create it from a place of peace , understanding , and non-judgement as opposed to ego consciousness and polarity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no matter what is happening , we are all united in our desire to see humanity thrive .

The Physicians For Informed Consent (PIC) recently published a report titled “Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC) Compares COVID-19 to Previous Seasonal and Pandemic Flu Periods.” In their article, they stated the following:
“The public has been made aware of the number of COVID-19 deaths and reported cases that have occurred since the beginning of the current pandemic; however, the number of unreported cases has not been widely known or publicized. Recently, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that more than one-third of SARS-CoV-2 (the coronavirus that can lead to COVID-19) infections are asymptomatic, meaning that initial estimations of its severity were grossly overestimated.
“Now, for the first time, Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC) has collated data from U.S. antibody studies and produced an educational document outlining how an accurate case-fatality rate (CFR) requires antibody studies in order to guide and measure medical care and public health policies.”
Similar to CDC estimations, PIC’s analysis results in a COVID-19 CFR of 0.26%, which is comparable to the CFRs of previous seasonal and pandemic flu periods.
Study After Study After Study: COVID-19 Mortality Rate Is Similar To Seasonal Flu (So Why The Insanity?)
“Knowing the CFR of COVID-19 allows for an objective standard by which to compare both non-pharmaceutical interventions and medical countermeasures,” said Dr. Shira Miller, PIC’s founder and president.
“For example, safety studies of any potential COVID-19 jjab should be able to prove whether or not the risks of the jjab are less than the risks of the infection.
“Regardless of proof of safety, however, a potential COVID-19 jjab should only be voluntary, in order to safeguard a patient’s human right to determine what will happen with his or her body,” said Dr. Miller.
You can view the PIC’s educational document assessing COVID-19 severity and how they came to their conclusion, here. Obviously the data is always delayed and things are constantly changing with regards to COVID-19 numbers.
Who are the PIC? They are a group of doctors and academics from around the world who have come together to support informed consent when it comes to mandatory jjab measures. Their information is based on science.
Their mission is to deliver data on infectious diseases and jjabs, and to unite doctors, scientists, healthcare professionals, attorneys, and families who support voluntary vaccinations.
Their vision is that doctors and the public are able to evaluate the data on infectious diseases and jjabs objectively and voluntarily engage in informed decision-making about vaccination.
They are not the only ones in the ‘academic world’ who make the point that COVID-19 perceptions of danger and numbers are unsubstantiated.
For example, John P. A. Ioannidis, a professor of medicine and epidemiology at Stanford University has said that the infection fatality rate is close to 0 percent for people under the age of 45 years old, explaining how that number rises significantly for people who are older, as with most other respiratory viruses. You can read more about that and access that here.
In fact, not long ago a study published by several academics from the Stanford School of Medicine suggests that COVID-19 has a similar infection fatality rate as seasonal influenza, you can read more about that and access the study here.
The mainstream media has also addressed the low case fatality rate, warning the public not to be compliant.
Why This Is Important
This is important because the data validates what many doctors have been emphasizing from the beginning of the lockdown, that the new coronavirus is being made out to be far more dangerous than it actually is. This is the opinion of many, not a consensus.
As a result, many scientists were extremely confused, and still are, at the measures that multiple governments have taken.
For example, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, a specialist in microbiology and one of the most cited research scientists in German history, was one of them. (source)
There seem to be dozens upon dozens of doctors and scientists raising the same ideas.
Doctors and scientists of such a prestigious background with decades of experience in the field have been censored and silenced by multiple social media platform for sharing their opinion and research, simply because it opposes the narrative that’s being put out by organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations, for example.
YouTube has flat out said that it’s censoring any information that contradicts the WHO.
It’s understandable why so many people are confused. On one hand you have mainstream media outlets reporting an overwhelming amount of dead bodies that have to be carted away in freezer trucks, and on the other hand you have a number of scientists and doctors letting people know that we are dealing something that we’ve been dealing with for decades, just another non-severe respiratory virus.
Complimenting that is “fact checkers” that are going around blindly upholding the government and health agency narrative. In reality, they are censoring different perspectives, not fact checking.
Other factors are also confusing, like the fact that deaths are being attributed to Covid that are not a result of it.
Did you know that metapneumovirus has been shown to have worldwide circulation with nearly universal infection by age 5?
We are talking billions of people. Did you know that outbreaks of metapneumovirus have been well documented every single year, especially in long term care facilities with mortality rates of up to 50%? (source)
Did you know that human metapneumovirus infection results in a large number of hospitalizations of children every single year?
Did you know nearly 1-2 million children every single year die of these types of respiratory illnesses because they lead to acute respiratory illness?
Imagine if the infection rates and death numbers were constantly tracked, and put on an easy to access website, mainstream media, radio etc…
Imagine if the other coronaviruses and respiratory illnesses that are more severe in some cases, and arguably more infectious in some cases were subjected to constant monitoring and beamed out to the population every single minute, could you imagine the fear and hysteria?
Are fear and hysteria being used as a marketing tool for a jjab?
What about Edward Snowden’s thoughts about the under-discussed consequences of the coronavirus pandemic and how it’s being used to take away more human rights?
Here’s a recent Instagram post I came across from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. It makes you wonder, doesn’t it?
Study After Study After Study: COVID-19 Mortality Rate Is Similar To Seasonal Flu (So Why The Insanity?)
The Takeaway
Right now, and we seem to see the same thing with other major global events, there seems to be a great divide amongst the population with regards to what is going on.
How dangerous is the virus is? Are receiving the correct information from not only our federal, state, and provincial health authorities but the WHO as well?
This divide was further expressed by the collective reaction to lockdown and other mandated measures that have been put in place.
There are simply a growing number of people who do not agree with the actions governments have taken to combat Covid, and many of them are doctors, scientists, and people who have some sort of expertise in this area.
The point is, we are not obligated to listen to our government. Although it seems that way sometimes, “obey or be punished”, the ultimate power lies with the people.
We as a collective choose what direction we go, and right now many of us are simply choosing to follow, obey, not question, and be wary of the ones who are asking questions.
This is OK, this path is not wrong, but how does it feel to simply follow narratives that you don’t know are true? Why are so many others questioning and backing up their conclusions with facts? What world is created out of blind acceptance of anything?
Furthermore, the emergence of a digital “fact-checker” going around the internet that’s censoring the opinions and research of some experts in the field simply serves as a catalyst for many to also question what is going on here.
The fact checks, in many cases, become so ridiculous that people are now realizing that the information that is fact checked is often the information to reflect on.
One thing is for certain, the coronavirus has served as a great catalyst for more people to start questioning what they’re told, and to seek out information for themselves.
For quite a long time, we haven’t really been thinking for ourselves, instead we’ve let “the corporation” do that for us. This is why we are seeing the emergence of so much information that continues to contradict what we are being told.
We have so much potential as a human race, and to come closer to accessing that potential, a great step would begin asking deeper and better questions about what we’re told. We can do this by gathering different perspectives as opposed to s simply one from mainstream media.
Reflect, is participating in our current political process helping us thrive? Or are we simply giving our power away to a system that is full of what we call corruption and that doesn’t have our best interests at hand?
Our current system was created from a level of consciousness that we as humans are evolving beyond. This is why so many are feeling a desire to look for new ideas and ways of seeing things, because our current ways no longer resonate with our being, we are simply doing them out of habit and unconsciousness.
In order to create a new system, you can’t do it from the same level of consciousness we are at now or else we will only create more of the same thing.
If we want change, might we create it when we as individuals operate from a greater sense of awareness and inclusiveness, a higher state of consciousness? Might we create it from a place of peace, understanding, and non-judgement as opposed to ego consciousness and polarity?
At the end of the day no matter what is happening, we are all united in our desire to see humanity thrive.
Reference: Collective-evolution.com


humansarefree--2020-07-24--John Ioannidis Warned COVID-19 Could Be a ‘Once-In-A-Century’ Data Fiasco – He Was Right

On Thursday , a Florida health official told a local news station that a young man who was listed as a COVID-19 victim had no underlying conditions .
The answer surprised reporters , who probed for additional information : “ He died in a motorcycle accident , ” Dr. Raul Pino clarified .
“ You could actually argue that it could have been the COVID-19 that caused him to crash .
I don ’ t know the conclusion of that one.
” The anecdote is a ridiculous example of a real controversy that has inspired some colorful memes : what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the question is important , such incidents may be just the tip of the proverbial iceberg regarding the unreliability of COVID-19 data .
In May , a public radio station in Miami broke what soon became a national story .
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC ) had been conflating antibody and viral testing , obscuring key metrics lawmakers use to determine if they should reopen their respective economies .
The story was soon picked up by NPR , who spoke to an epidemiologist who condemned the practice .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ under the same category is not appropriate , as these two types of tests are very different and tell us different things , ” Dr. Jennifer Nuzzo of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security told NPR .
The Atlantic soon followed with an article that explained the agency was painting an inaccurate picture of the state of the pandemic .
The practice , the writers said , was making it difficult to tell if more people were actually sick or had merely acquired antibodies from fighting off the virus .
“ How @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This is a mess , ” said Ashish Jha , the K. T. Li Professor of Global Health at Harvard and director of the Harvard Global Health Institute .
In some ways the “ mess ” was no surprise .
Two weeks earlier , Dr. Deborah Leah Birx , the White House ’ s coronavirus task force response coordinator , reportedly ripped the agency in a meeting , saying “ there is nothing from the CDC that I can trust.
” Birx ’ s concerns about the CDC ’ s data did not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ New York Times speculated that perhaps the agency had sought to “ bolster the testing numbers for political purposes.
” The Texas Observer wondered if the state was “ inflating its COVID testing numbers by including antibody tests.
” Considering President Trump ’ s sometimes comically inaccurate boasts about America ’ s testing prowess , perhaps such questions were not unjustified .
The many people who spoke to the Times said the answer was simpler , attributing the flawed system to “ confusion and fatigue in overworked state and local health departments.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the architects of the ploy were in for a rude awakening .
Testing numbers did soar , but so did case numbers ; the surge in late June and throughout July spawned new fears of a second wave and more lockdowns and more charges that America was botching the pandemic .
Tensions between the White House and its own agency boiled over last week when the Trump Administration stripped the CDC of its role in collecting data on COVID-19 hospitalizations .
It ’ s hard to read the drama , incompetence , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ioannidis , the C.F .
Rehnborg Chair in Disease Prevention at Stanford University .
In a March 17 STAT article , Ioannidis warned the world was looking at what could turn out to be a “ once-in-a-century evidence fiasco.
” He worried central planners were making sweeping and reflexive changes without sufficient data .
Locking people up without knowing the fatality risk of COVID-19 could have severe social and financial consequences that could be totally irrational , Ioannidis warned .
“ It ’ s like an elephant being attacked by a house cat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cat , the elephant accidentally jumps off a cliff and dies , ” said Ioannidis , one of the most-cited scientists in the world .
In one sense , Ioannidis has already been proven right .
The models on which lockdowns were initiated have already proven astronomically wrong .
But that was hardly the only example .
Every day it seems there ’ s another story about reporting flaws or mixups .
Tuesday it was a lab in Connecticut where researchers said they discovered a flaw in a testing system for the virus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ receiving false positives .
That may not sound like many , but researchers said the test is used by labs across America .
A few days earlier , it was announced that Texas had removed 3,484 cases from its positive Covid-19 case count because the San Antonio Health Department was reporting “ probable ” cases .
None of the people had actually tested positive for COVID-19 .
We don ’ t know how many new cases are probable cases and not positive cases , but we know it ’ s a lot .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the CDC changed its reporting to include people who had not tested positive for the virus but might have it .
As the Associated Press noted , the change was made with the understanding that “ deaths could soon jump because federal health officials will now count illnesses that are not confirmed by lab testing.
” The One Thing Everyone Agrees On COVID-19 has been far from the deadliest virus in modern history , but it has been the most divisive .
The public , politicians , policy experts , and public health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is and how best to contain it .
But the one thing everyone seems to agree on is the numbers we have — fatalities and cases — are way wrong .
A new CDC report estimates COVID-19 rates about 10 times higher than reported .
Ioannidis put the figure even higher , estimating weeks ago that as many 300 million people had already been infected globally .
The New York Times says COVID-19 deaths have been massively undercounted .
Dr. Ashish Jha , speaking to Lawrence O ’ Donnell on MSNBC , agreed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a “ substantial undercount.
” Others , including nearly one-third of Americans according to a recent survey , believe that the COVID-19 death toll is inflated .
This includes physicians who say medical professionals are being pressured by hospital administrators to add coronavirus to death sheets .
Writing at the American Mind , Angelo Codevilla recently argued if the CDC had used the same criterion for the SARS virus as COVID-19—primarily “ severe acute respiratory distress syndrome ” —total COVID fatalities in the US would have been 16,000 through June .
Nobody knows @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But the one thing left and right seem to agree on is the data we have are junk .
And yet the lesson we keep hearing is “ trust the experts.
” “ Follow the science .
Listen to the experts .
Do what they tell you , ” Joe Biden said in April .
But thinkers as diverse as Matthew Yglesias at Vox to author Matt Ridley have pointed out the dangers of blindly following “ the experts , ” especially when they ’ ve shown themselves to be spectacularly wrong from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ It ’ s dangerous to rely too much on models ( which lead politicians to ) lock down society and destroy people ’ s livelihood , ” Ridley recently told John Stossel .
“ Danger lies both ways.
” Ridley has a point .
The experts can ’ t agree on their own numbers or even clearly answer if a man who died in a motorcycle accident while infected should be labeled as a COVID-19 death .
In light of this , perhaps it ’ s time for the experts to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to individuals instead of advocating collective blunt force .
Study After Study After Study : COVID-19 Mortality Rate Is Similar To Seasonal Flu ( So Why The Insanity ? )

On Thursday, a Florida health official told a local news station that a young man who was listed as a COVID-19 victim had no underlying conditions. The answer surprised reporters, who probed for additional information:
“He died in a motorcycle accident,” Dr. Raul Pino clarified. “You could actually argue that it could have been the COVID-19 that caused him to crash. I don’t know the conclusion of that one.”
The anecdote is a ridiculous example of a real controversy that has inspired some colorful memes: what should define a COVID-19 death?
While the question is important, such incidents may be just the tip of the proverbial iceberg regarding the unreliability of COVID-19 data.
In May, a public radio station in Miami broke what soon became a national story.
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) had been conflating antibody and viral testing, obscuring key metrics lawmakers use to determine if they should reopen their respective economies.
The story was soon picked up by NPR, who spoke to an epidemiologist who condemned the practice.
“Reporting both serology and viral tests under the same category is not appropriate, as these two types of tests are very different and tell us different things,” Dr. Jennifer Nuzzo of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security told NPR.
The Atlantic soon followed with an article that explained the agency was painting an inaccurate picture of the state of the pandemic.
The practice, the writers said, was making it difficult to tell if more people were actually sick or had merely acquired antibodies from fighting off the virus.
Public health experts were not impressed.
“How could the CDC make that mistake? This is a mess,” said Ashish Jha, the K. T. Li Professor of Global Health at Harvard and director of the Harvard Global Health Institute.
In some ways the “mess” was no surprise. Two weeks earlier, Dr. Deborah Leah Birx, the White House’s coronavirus task force response coordinator, reportedly ripped the agency in a meeting, saying “there is nothing from the CDC that I can trust.”
Birx’s concerns about the CDC’s data did not alleviate concerns of data manipulation. The New York Times speculated that perhaps the agency had sought to “bolster the testing numbers for political purposes.”
The Texas Observer wondered if the state was “inflating its COVID testing numbers by including antibody tests.”
Considering President Trump’s sometimes comically inaccurate boasts about America’s testing prowess, perhaps such questions were not unjustified.
The many people who spoke to the Times said the answer was simpler, attributing the flawed system to “confusion and fatigue in overworked state and local health departments.”
If data manipulation had been the motive, the architects of the ploy were in for a rude awakening.
Testing numbers did soar, but so did case numbers; the surge in late June and throughout July spawned new fears of a second wave and more lockdowns and more charges that America was botching the pandemic.
(The surge was the result of both increased testing, including antibody testing, as well as a resurgence of the virus.)
Tensions between the White House and its own agency boiled over last week when the Trump Administration stripped the CDC of its role in collecting data on COVID-19 hospitalizations.
A Data Fiasco of Historical Proportions?
It’s hard to read the drama, incompetence, and confusion without thinking about Dr. John Ioannidis, the C.F. Rehnborg Chair in Disease Prevention at Stanford University.
In a March 17 STAT article, Ioannidis warned the world was looking at what could turn out to be a “once-in-a-century evidence fiasco.” He worried central planners were making sweeping and reflexive changes without sufficient data.
Locking people up without knowing the fatality risk of COVID-19 could have severe social and financial consequences that could be totally irrational, Ioannidis warned.
“It’s like an elephant being attacked by a house cat. Frustrated and trying to avoid the cat, the elephant accidentally jumps off a cliff and dies,” said Ioannidis, one of the most-cited scientists in the world.
In one sense, Ioannidis has already been proven right. The models on which lockdowns were initiated have already proven astronomically wrong. But that was hardly the only example.
Every day it seems there’s another story about reporting flaws or mixups.
Tuesday it was a lab in Connecticut where researchers said they discovered a flaw in a testing system for the virus. The flaw resulted in 90 people receiving false positives. That may not sound like many, but researchers said the test is used by labs across America.
A few days earlier, it was announced that Texas had removed 3,484 cases from its positive Covid-19 case count because the San Antonio Health Department was reporting “probable” cases. None of the people had actually tested positive for COVID-19.
We don’t know how many new cases are probable cases and not positive cases, but we know it’s a lot.
That’s because in April, the CDC changed its reporting to include people who had not tested positive for the virus but might have it.
(The CDC’s criteria for what qualifies as a probable case are more than a little confusing.)
As the Associated Press noted, the change was made with the understanding that “deaths could soon jump because federal health officials will now count illnesses that are not confirmed by lab testing.”
The One Thing Everyone Agrees On
COVID-19 has been far from the deadliest virus in modern history, but it has been the most divisive. The public, politicians, policy experts, and public health officials have disagreed on how deadly it is and how best to contain it.
But the one thing everyone seems to agree on is the numbers we have — fatalities and cases — are way wrong. A new CDC report estimates COVID-19 rates about 10 times higher than reported.
Ioannidis put the figure even higher, estimating weeks ago that as many 300 million people had already been infected globally.
Deaths are more complicated.
The New York Times says COVID-19 deaths have been massively undercounted. Dr. Ashish Jha, speaking to Lawrence O’Donnell on MSNBC, agreed, saying most experts agreed there is a “substantial undercount.”
Others, including nearly one-third of Americans according to a recent survey, believe that the COVID-19 death toll is inflated. This includes physicians who say medical professionals are being pressured by hospital administrators to add coronavirus to death sheets.
Writing at the American Mind, Angelo Codevilla recently argued if the CDC had used the same criterion for the SARS virus as COVID-19—primarily “severe acute respiratory distress syndrome”—total COVID fatalities in the US would have been 16,000 through June.
Nobody knows the true count, of course. But the one thing left and right seem to agree on is the data we have are junk. And yet the lesson we keep hearing is “trust the experts.”
“Follow the science. Listen to the experts. Do what they tell you,” Joe Biden said in April.
But thinkers as diverse as Matthew Yglesias at Vox to author Matt Ridley have pointed out the dangers of blindly following “the experts,” especially when they’ve shown themselves to be spectacularly wrong from the very beginning on the COVID-19 pandemic.
“It’s dangerous to rely too much on models (which lead politicians to) lock down society and destroy people’s livelihood,” Ridley recently told John Stossel. “Danger lies both ways.”
Ridley has a point. The experts can’t agree on their own numbers or even clearly answer if a man who died in a motorcycle accident while infected should be labeled as a COVID-19 death.
In light of this, perhaps it’s time for the experts to exercise some humility and begin offering guidance to individuals instead of advocating collective blunt force.
Study After Study After Study: COVID-19 Mortality Rate Is Similar To Seasonal Flu (So Why The Insanity?)
Source: FEE.org


humansarefree--2020-07-24--FDA Approved, DARPA Funded, Under-the-Skin Biosensor to Detect Signs of Illness

The Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) approves A LOT of prescriptions and products that are eventually proven to be harmful .
Sometimes catastrophically harmful .
The agency has even been blamed for the Opioid Crisis by some very credible people .
Activist Post reports regularly about the agency ’ s mishaps , mistakes , and shenanigans ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ) .
So should we be concerned about them being in charge of approving an under-the-skin biosensor to detect symptoms like those found with Covid-19 ?
A Military-Funded Biosensor Could Be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wins FDA approval next year , the two-part sensor could help spot new infections weeks before symptoms begin to show .
Why are pandemics so hard to stop ?
Often it ’ s because the disease moves faster than people can be tested for it .
The Defense Department is helping to fund a new study to determine whether an under-the-skin biosensor can help trackers keep up — by detecting flu-like infections even before their symptoms begin to show .
Its maker , Profusa , says the sensor is on track to try @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The sensor has two parts .
One is a 3mm string of hydrogel , a material whose network of polymer chains is used in some contact lenses and other implants .
Inserted under the skin with a syringe , the string includes a specially engineered molecule that sends a fluorescent signal outside of the body when the body begins to fight an infection .
The other part is an electronic component attached to the skin .
It sends light through the skin , detects the fluorescent signal and generates another signal that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , website , etc..
It ’ s like a blood lab on the skin that can pick up the body ’ s response to illness before the presence of other symptoms , like coughing .
The announcement comes as the United States grapples with COVID-19 , a respiratory illness that can present in flu-like symptoms such as coughing and shortness of breath .
The military is taking a leading role in vaccine research , Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Mark Milley told reporters at the Pentagon on Monday .
“ Our military @ @ @ @ @ @ @ horn here to try to come up with a vaccine .
So we ’ ll see how that develops over the next couple of months , ” Milley said .
U.S. troops themselves are also at risk .
A U.S. soldier in South Korea became the first U.S. service member to contract the virus , the Wall Street Journal reported in February .
Profusa ’ s newest funded study , which the company announced on Tuesday , will test how well the sensor can detect influenza outbreaks up to three weeks before it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ current methods .
Because the gel doesn ’ t actually emit any signal , it wouldn ’ t give away a soldier ’ s position , so the sensor could be used in sensitive settings like behind enemy lines , Profusa CEO Ben Hwang said .
Hwang said his company has received grants from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency , or DARPA , since around 2011 .
“ They gave us grant money to help our research and as we prove out a certain milestone , as we de-risk the technology , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a third phase and provide support , ” he said .
“ Their support has transitioned from grants into these types of programs that create real-world evidence.
” Hwang said DARPA is helping the company reach out to other outfits within the Defense Department that might use the device on troops or servicemembers .
That could include partnerships with U.S. Special Operations Command , for instance , or , Indo-Pacific Command .
He declined to comment on conversations with specific military customers .
Are you now as creeped out and freaked out as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ With DARPA & Department Of Defense For New DNA Nanotech COVID19 Vaccine

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approves A LOT of prescriptions and products that are eventually proven to be harmful. Sometimes catastrophically harmful.
The agency has even been blamed for the Opioid Crisis by some very credible people. Activist Post reports regularly about the agency’s mishaps, mistakes, and shenanigans (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5).
So should we be concerned about them being in charge of approving an under-the-skin biosensor to detect symptoms like those found with Covid-19?
From GovExec Daily, published March 4, 2020:
A Military-Funded Biosensor Could Be the Future of Pandemic Detection
If it wins FDA approval next year, the two-part sensor could help spot new infections weeks before symptoms begin to show.
Why are pandemics so hard to stop? Often it’s because the disease moves faster than people can be tested for it.
The Defense Department is helping to fund a new study to determine whether an under-the-skin biosensor can help trackers keep up — by detecting flu-like infections even before their symptoms begin to show.
Its maker, Profusa, says the sensor is on track to try for FDA approval by early next year.
The sensor has two parts. One is a 3mm string of hydrogel, a material whose network of polymer chains is used in some contact lenses and other implants.
Inserted under the skin with a syringe, the string includes a specially engineered molecule that sends a fluorescent signal outside of the body when the body begins to fight an infection. The other part is an electronic component attached to the skin.
It sends light through the skin, detects the fluorescent signal and generates another signal that the wearer can send to a doctor, website, etc..
It’s like a blood lab on the skin that can pick up the body’s response to illness before the presence of other symptoms, like coughing.
The announcement comes as the United States grapples with COVID-19, a respiratory illness that can present in flu-like symptoms such as coughing and shortness of breath. The military is taking a leading role in jjab research, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Mark Milley told reporters at the Pentagon on Monday.
“Our military research labs are working feverishly around the horn here to try to come up with a jjab. So we’ll see how that develops over the next couple of months,” Milley said. U.S. troops themselves are also at risk.
A U.S. soldier in South Korea became the first U.S. service member to contract the virus, the Wall Street Journal reported in February.
Profusa’s newest funded study, which the company announced on Tuesday, will test how well the sensor can detect influenza outbreaks up to three weeks before it’s possible to detect them using current methods.
Because the gel doesn’t actually emit any signal, it wouldn’t give away a soldier’s position, so the sensor could be used in sensitive settings like behind enemy lines, Profusa CEO Ben Hwang said.
Hwang said his company has received grants from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA, since around 2011.
“They gave us grant money to help our research and as we prove out a certain milestone, as we de-risk the technology, they give us a second phrase and a third phase and provide support,” he said.
“Their support has transitioned from grants into these types of programs that create real-world evidence.”
Hwang said DARPA is helping the company reach out to other outfits within the Defense Department that might use the device on troops or servicemembers.
That could include partnerships with U.S. Special Operations Command, for instance, or, Indo-Pacific Command.
He declined to comment on conversations with specific military customers.
Are you now as creeped out and freaked out as I am?
By B.N. Frank, Guest writer