humansarefree--2020-10-22--Wayback Machine Latest Victim of Big Tech Censorship

The promise of an internet modeled around democratized access to information is quickly eroding before our very eyes as the Wayback Machine falls prey to censorship creep and major tech sector consolidations take us to the point of no return .
In what is turning out to be something of a latter-day dot com bust , many small to medium-sized tech startups are teetering on the edge of oblivion as the deliberate economic shutdown eats away at their capitalization and opens the door for the biggest fish in the tech space and others to pick the ripest fruit from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the original , this start up bust is accompanied by a very precise view of market opportunities for interested buyers and investors , brought on by an equally deliberate reshaping of workplace conditions and societal interactions which are driving companies like Microsoft to “ aggregate capabilities ” in “ cloud computing , collaboration , access management , and other business continuity tools that saw a surge in demand during regional lockdowns.
” The ride-share behemoth , Uber , for example , is reportedly in talks to acquire Grubhub and expand its food-delivery @ @ @ @ @ @ @ purchase of robotic automation company , Softomotive .
One global research and advisory firm that focuses on IT and finance has even put out a guide “ on how tech startups can best prepare for being acquired by a larger company , ” revealing that just 13 companies accounted for a full 60 percent of the $ 150 billion raised by tech startups between March and April .
Signs that yet another massive wave of consolidation in the technology sector is on the horizon and is already raising concerns throughout the industry , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in tandem with a larger push by outfits like Twitter , Facebook and other huge tech players to stifle freedom of online expression and association should make us pay closer attention to the dynamics at play .
Under the guise of facilitating conversation , Twitter unveiled changes to the reply feature that ostensibly gives users more control , but in reality , it broadens the ability to censor content .
The new format , still in testing mode , will allow users to select who can and can not reply to their tweets @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a serious problem from the vantage point of free flowing interaction and gives even more power to the most popular accounts to stifle undesirable feedback , leaving their viewpoints publicly unchallenged .
Another seemingly innocuous development in the last few days was the announcement made by popular podcaster Joe Rogan on his move to Spotify .
The comedian and UFC commentator ’ s immensely popular podcast has been freely available on YouTube and other platforms since its inception , but his multi-million-dollar exclusive licensing deal with the music platform will further cloister content @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its reach and propagation .
Perhaps the most concerning , however , are the changes taking place at one of the most important research tools on the Internet and , up to now , a venerable tool for online transparency : The Wayback Machine .
In the campy 1970s futuristic movie “ Rollerball , ” starring a young James Caan as a superstar athlete at the twilight of his celebrated career , there is a curious scene in which his character , Jonathan E , visits an archive where the entire knowledge base @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in charge of the quantum computer-like machine mentions , in passing , that due to some unknown glitch , the records containing the whole of the thirteenth century have been lost .
Such a predicament is , no doubt , much closer to becoming a real possibility as more and more of humanity ’ s knowledge is accumulated in massive digital repositories .
The danger is not only in the outright loss of stored data as a result of technical malfunctions but also in the greater ability to execute historical revisionism and misrepresenting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a widely consulted online encyclopedia – is already guilty of this .
But , now the Wayback Internet archive is trending down this slippery slope with its recently implemented labeling of snapshot results as potential disinformation .
As a former editor , Elliot Leavy , warns in an article addressing the changes at the Wayback Machine site , “ if we continue to censor the past , attaching intent to some but not to others , we will be unable to evaluate anything at all.
” Indeed , the new measures instituted at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Review over worries of COVID-19 “ hoaxes ” do not bode well for the survival of historical accuracy and a discerning populace .
The promise of the internet as an “ information superhighway ” modeled around democratized access to information is quickly eroding before our very eyes , as the measures are taken to curb the COVID-19 pandemic are being used to restrict unfettered knowledge .
Together with the swift consolidation of tech companies that own the means to distribute and create the platforms we are obliged to use , we might soon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when he realized that his once greatest supporters and benefactors were only looking to push him out the door and find a more pliable and less curious superstar .

The promise of an internet modeled around democratized access to information is quickly eroding before our very eyes as the Wayback Machine falls prey to censorship creep and major tech sector consolidations take us to the point of no return.
by Raul Diego
In what is turning out to be something of a latter-day dot com bust, many small to medium-sized tech startups are teetering on the edge of oblivion as the deliberate economic shutdown eats away at their capitalization and opens the door for the biggest fish in the tech space and others to pick the ripest fruit from the tech start up tree.
As opposed to the original, this start up bust is accompanied by a very precise view of market opportunities for interested buyers and investors, brought on by an equally deliberate reshaping of workplace conditions and societal interactions which are driving companies like Microsoft to “aggregate capabilities” in “cloud computing, collaboration, access management, and other business continuity tools that saw a surge in demand during regional lockdowns.”
The ride-share behemoth, Uber, for example, is reportedly in talks to acquire Grubhub and expand its food-delivery operations, while Microsoft just completed its purchase of robotic automation company, Softomotive.
One global research and advisory firm that focuses on IT and finance has even put out a guide “on how tech startups can best prepare for being acquired by a larger company,” revealing that just 13 companies accounted for a full 60 percent of the $150 billion raised by tech startups between March and April.
Signs that yet another massive wave of consolidation in the technology sector is on the horizon and is already raising concerns throughout the industry, but the fact that it is occurring in tandem with a larger push by outfits like Twitter, Facebook and other huge tech players to stifle freedom of online expression and association should make us pay closer attention to the dynamics at play.
Censorship creep
Under the guise of facilitating conversation, Twitter unveiled changes to the reply feature that ostensibly gives users more control, but in reality, it broadens the ability to censor content.
The new format, still in testing mode, will allow users to select who can and cannot reply to their tweets.
This, of course, presents a serious problem from the vantage point of free flowing interaction and gives even more power to the most popular accounts to stifle undesirable feedback, leaving their viewpoints publicly unchallenged.
Another seemingly innocuous development in the last few days was the announcement made by popular podcaster Joe Rogan on his move to Spotify.
The comedian and UFC commentator’s immensely popular podcast has been freely available on YouTube and other platforms since its inception, but his multi-million-dollar exclusive licensing deal with the music platform will further cloister content behind a single outfit and likely diminish its reach and propagation.
Perhaps the most concerning, however, are the changes taking place at one of the most important research tools on the Internet and, up to now, a venerable tool for online transparency: The Wayback Machine.
Misplaced century
In the campy 1970s futuristic movie “Rollerball,” starring a young James Caan as a superstar athlete at the twilight of his celebrated career, there is a curious scene in which his character, Jonathan E, visits an archive where the entire knowledge base of humanity is stored.
The man in charge of the quantum computer-like machine mentions, in passing, that due to some unknown glitch, the records containing the whole of the thirteenth century have been lost.
Such a predicament is, no doubt, much closer to becoming a real possibility as more and more of humanity’s knowledge is accumulated in massive digital repositories.
The danger is not only in the outright loss of stored data as a result of technical malfunctions but also in the greater ability to execute historical revisionism and misrepresenting facts to future generations.
Wikipedia – a widely consulted online encyclopedia – is already guilty of this. But, now the Wayback Internet archive is trending down this slippery slope with its recently implemented labeling of snapshot results as potential disinformation.
As a former editor, Elliot Leavy, warns in an article addressing the changes at the Wayback Machine site, “if we continue to censor the past, attaching intent to some but not to others, we will be unable to evaluate anything at all.”
Indeed, the new measures instituted at the behest of MIT’s Technology Review over worries of COVID-19 “hoaxes” do not bode well for the survival of historical accuracy and a discerning populace.
The promise of the internet as an “information superhighway” modeled around democratized access to information is quickly eroding before our very eyes, as the measures are taken to curb the COVID-19 pandemic are being used to restrict unfettered knowledge.
Together with the swift consolidation of tech companies that own the means to distribute and create the platforms we are obliged to use, we might soon find ourselves feeling like Jonathan E did when he realized that his once greatest supporters and benefactors were only looking to push him out the door and find a more pliable and less curious superstar.


humansarefree--2020-10-22--ONS Statistics: Normal Mortality Rate and NO PANDEMIC

The orange line is the average death rate from all causes between 2015 and 2019 .
The red line is @ @ @ @ @ causes in 2020 including deaths caused by lockdown and the two lines are currently the @ @ @ @ @ being locked down because of a ‘ crisis ’ of ‘ cases ’ – not @ @ @ @ @ positive in a test not testing for the ‘ virus ’ .
Jail them all @ @ @ @ @ .
– David Icke

The orange line is the average death rate from all causes between 2015 and 2019.
The red line is the death rate from all causes in 2020 including deaths caused by lockdown and the two lines are currently the same while the country is being locked down because of a ‘crisis’ of ‘cases’ – not deaths – from people testing positive in a test not testing for the ‘virus’.
Jail them all and throw the key away. – David Icke
Where’s the pandemic? ONS figures showing no current excess mortality:
Source: UK Column on YouTube.com (Brian Gerrish, Mike Robinson and Alex Thomson).


humansarefree--2020-10-22--Mr. President, This is the Solution to Big Tech Censorship

The issue of censorship by major tech companies is a precarious one , and I ’ m becoming increasingly suspicious of the nature of the debate .
There are some complexities , but it can all be boiled down to this : Big tech social media conglomerates argue that their websites are like any other private business and that they are protected from overt government interference by the US constitution .
In other words , they have a right to platform or deplatform anyone they choose .
Of course , this is the exact OPPOSITE of what most leftist groups @ @ @ @ @ @ @ comes to private businesses refusing to cooperate with people they disagree with on basic principle , such as LGBT activists , but let ’ s set that hypocrisy aside for now .
Social media companies have decided that the people they want to deplatform most are conservatives , along anyone else who disagrees with hard left ideologies such as social justice or the handling of the pandemic situation .
Statements or content that run contrary to leftist philosophies are simply labeled “ hate speech ” or “ conspiracy theory ” and are erased @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a monopoly with far too much power , that social media should be treated more like a public resource or “ town square ” and that these companies are violating the free speech rights of conservatives by specifically targeting them for censorship .
Many conservatives are also demanding that Donald Trump and the government step in to regulate or punish such companies for these actions .
The truth is that both sides are right , and both sides are wrong .
The real solution to the problem requires a radical change in how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ how they interact with government , and it ’ s a solution I doubt ANY political official will consider , and that includes Trump .
Social media and big tech do in fact represent a monopoly , but not in terms most people are familiar with .
Instead of acting only as an economic monopoly controlling market share , big tech is also a political monopoly controlling the majority of communication platforms .
If only one political and social ideological group dominates every major social media and digital information outlet , this in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dynamic that does indeed threaten the free speech rights of the populace .
Rabid censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal , a scandal that is supported by facts and evidence that big tech has chosen to bury because it ’ s inconvenient to them rather than a violation of their community guidelines , is just one more example of the incredible danger that social media monopolies present .
Obviously , there is the issue of private property rights to consider .
I fully support and defend private property rights and I do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to refuse service to anyone for any reason .
Just because you open your doors to the public does not mean the public now owns your labor .
You should have the right to refuse labor whenever you wish .
If a business refuses a customer based merely on personal bias , then word is going to get around quickly and that business may lose a large number of potential buyers in the future ( this is happening right now with multiple alternative social media companies on the rise ) .
The free @ @ @ @ @ @ @ business , not state or federal governments .
Government itself is an untrustworthy entity that craves a monopoly of power , and by handing government the authority to micromanage the policies and internal practices of web companies we might be trading the big tech monster for an even more dangerous governmental monster .
Who is to say that the government will stop with sites like Facebook or Twitter or Google ?
Maybe they will exploit their newfound powers to go after smaller websites as well .
Maybe they will attempt to micromanage the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dominating and restricting conservative websites instead of the leftist conglomerates we intended , and then we will be doubly screwed .
If you value freedom and the Bill of Rights , then this debate leaves us at an impasse .
Both sides ( perhaps conveniently ) lead to a totalitarian outcome .
The thing is , the publicly presented argument is a contrived one , a manipulated discussion that only presents two sides when there are more options to consider .
The narrative is fixed , it is a farce .
The public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and corporations are separate tools that can be used to keep each side in check .
This is a lie .
Big government and big corporations have always worked together while pretending to be disconnected , and this needs to stop if we are to ever defuse the political time bomb we now face .
To solve the social media censorship debacle we need to examine the very roots of corporations as entities .
First , corporations as we know them today are a relatively new phenomenon .
Adam Smith described the concept @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stock company ” in his treatise ‘ The Wealth Of Nations ’ , and stood against them as a threat to free market economics .
He specifically outlined their history of monopoly and failure , and criticized their habit of avoiding responsibility for mistakes and crimes .
Joint stock companies were chartered by governments and given special protections from risk , as well as protection from civil litigation ( lawsuits ) .
But , they were supposed to be temporary business entities , not perpetual business entities .
The point was to allow @ @ @ @ @ @ @ company to finish a particular job , such as building a railroad , and once the job was finished the company was dissolved and the government protections were no longer needed .
Smith knew that if corporations were ever allowed to become permanent fixtures in an economy , they would result in disaster .
This is exactly what happened in 1886 when the Supreme Court allowed companies like Southern Pacific Railroad to use the 14th Amendment , which was supposed to protect the constitutional rights of newly freed slaves , as a loophole @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” with all the protections of an individual citizen .
Not only that , but with limited liability , corporations actually became super-citizens with protections far beyond normal individuals .
Corporations became the preeminent force in the world and it was their relationship with governments that made this possible .
This fact completely debunks today ’ s notion of what constitutes free markets .
Corporations ARE NOT free market structures .
They are , in fact , government chartered and government protected monopolies .
They are SOCIALIST creations , not free market creations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in a free market society at all .
The alternative option to corporations was for businesses to form “ partnerships ” , which did not enjoy protection from government , limited liability or the ability to form monopolies .
When the owners of a partnership committed a crime , they could be personally held liable for that crime .
When a corporation commits a crime , only the company as a vaporous faceless entity can be punished .
This is why it is very rare to see company CEOs face prosecution no matter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Today , certain corporations continue to enjoy government protections while also enjoying government welfare .
Meaning , these companies get a legal shield while also basking in the advantage of tax incentives and taxpayer dollars .
For example , Google ( Alphabet and YouTube ) has long received huge tax breaks and is rarely if ever forced to pay in full for the massive bandwidth the company uses .
In fact , YouTube was facing bandwidth affordability issues until it was purchased by Alphabet and Google , then it no longer had to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 21 times more bandwidth than it actually pays for because of government intervention .
The same rules apply to companies like Twitter , Facebook , Netflix , Apple , etc .
All of them enjoy extensive tax breaks as well as cheap bandwidth that makes it impossible for small and medium sized businesses to compete , even if they operate on a superior model or have superior ideas .
Many times the corporations pay no taxes whatsoever while smaller businesses are crippled by overt payments .
A true free market requires competition as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deliberately crushes competition .
Again , we live in a socialist framework , not a free market framework .
Now that we understand the nature of Big Tech and what these companies actually are ( creations of government ) , the debate on social media censorship changes .
Take for example the fact that public universities in the US are not legally allowed to interfere with free speech rights because many of them survive by consuming taxpayer dollars .
They are PUBLIC institutions , not private .
Why then are we treating major @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and incentives as if they are private businesses ?
They are not – They are publicly funded structures chartered by the government and therefore they should be subject to the same rules on free speech that universities are required to follow .
Said corporations will surely argue against this and will attempt to use legal chicanery to maintain their monopolies .
Trying to dismantle them could take decades , and there are no guarantees that government officials will even make the attempt ?
Why would they ?
The relationship between government and corporations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ elites for decades .
Instead of challenging the corporate model in the Supreme Court , an easier option would be to simply take away all welfare and tax incentives for any big tech companies that refuse to allow free speech on their platforms .
If Google had to pay normal price for the bandwidth it uses , the corporation would either implode or it would be forced to break apart into multiple smaller companies that would then compete with each other .
More competition means lower prices for consumers along with better products @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would mean more large companies would refrain from censorship .
Donald Trump as president could conceivably make this happen , but he will not , and neither will any other political official .
The partnership between government and corporations will continue , I believe , because there are other agendas at play here .
The establishment WANTS the public to argue in favor of tech totalitarianism on one side and in favor of government totalitarianism on the other side .
They aren ’ t going to allow any other solutions to enter the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for fighting back against big tech is to continue leaving their platforms and building our own .
This will take many years to accomplish .
The point is , there is a more permanent option , but it requires a complete deconstruction of the socialist government/corporate framework now in place .
To confront the power dynamic between governments and major conglomerates is to confront one of the fundamental sources of corruption within our society , which is why it won ’ t be allowed .
And when the system refuses to police itself @ @ @ @ @ @

by Brandon Smith
The issue of censorship by major tech companies is a precarious one, and I’m becoming increasingly suspicious of the nature of the debate. There are some complexities, but it can all be boiled down to this:
Big tech social media conglomerates argue that their websites are like any other private business and that they are protected from overt government interference by the US constitution.
In other words, they have a right to platform or deplatform anyone they choose. Of course, this is the exact OPPOSITE of what most leftist groups have argued in the past when it comes to private businesses refusing to cooperate with people they disagree with on basic principle, such as LGBT activists, but let’s set that hypocrisy aside for now.
Social media companies have decided that the people they want to deplatform most are conservatives, along anyone else who disagrees with hard left ideologies such as social justice or the handling of the pandemic situation.
Statements or content that run contrary to leftist philosophies are simply labeled “hate speech” or “conspiracy theory” and are erased.
Conservatives argue that big tech is a monopoly with far too much power, that social media should be treated more like a public resource or “town square” and that these companies are violating the free speech rights of conservatives by specifically targeting them for censorship.
Many conservatives are also demanding that Donald Trump and the government step in to regulate or punish such companies for these actions.
The truth is that both sides are right, and both sides are wrong.
The real solution to the problem requires a radical change in how we view the institution of corporations and how they interact with government, and it’s a solution I doubt ANY political official will consider, and that includes Trump.
Let me explain…
Social media and big tech do in fact represent a monopoly, but not in terms most people are familiar with.
Instead of acting only as an economic monopoly controlling market share, big tech is also a political monopoly controlling the majority of communication platforms.
If only one political and social ideological group dominates every major social media and digital information outlet, this in my view represents a completely unbalanced power dynamic that does indeed threaten the free speech rights of the populace.
Rabid censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal, a scandal that is supported by facts and evidence that big tech has chosen to bury because it’s inconvenient to them rather than a violation of their community guidelines, is just one more example of the incredible danger that social media monopolies present.
Obviously, there is the issue of private property rights to consider. I fully support and defend private property rights and I do believe that a business has the freedom to refuse service to anyone for any reason.
Just because you open your doors to the public does not mean the public now owns your labor. You should have the right to refuse labor whenever you wish.
If a business refuses a customer based merely on personal bias, then word is going to get around quickly and that business may lose a large number of potential buyers in the future (this is happening right now with multiple alternative social media companies on the rise).
The free market should determine the fate of that business, not state or federal governments.
Government itself is an untrustworthy entity that craves a monopoly of power, and by handing government the authority to micromanage the policies and internal practices of web companies we might be trading the big tech monster for an even more dangerous governmental monster.
Who is to say that the government will stop with sites like Facebook or Twitter or Google?
Maybe they will exploit their newfound powers to go after smaller websites as well. Maybe they will attempt to micromanage the entire internet. Maybe they will start dominating and restricting conservative websites instead of the leftist conglomerates we intended, and then we will be doubly screwed.
If you value freedom and the Bill of Rights, then this debate leaves us at an impasse. Both sides (perhaps conveniently) lead to a totalitarian outcome.
The thing is, the publicly presented argument is a contrived one, a manipulated discussion that only presents two sides when there are more options to consider. The narrative is fixed, it is a farce.
The public has been led to believe that government and corporations are separate tools that can be used to keep each side in check. This is a lie.
Big government and big corporations have always worked together while pretending to be disconnected, and this needs to stop if we are to ever defuse the political time bomb we now face.
To solve the social media censorship debacle we need to examine the very roots of corporations as entities.
First, corporations as we know them today are a relatively new phenomenon. Adam Smith described the concept of a corporation as a “joint stock company” in his treatise ‘The Wealth Of Nations’, and stood against them as a threat to free market economics.
He specifically outlined their history of monopoly and failure, and criticized their habit of avoiding responsibility for mistakes and crimes.
Joint stock companies were chartered by governments and given special protections from risk, as well as protection from civil litigation (lawsuits). But, they were supposed to be temporary business entities, not perpetual business entities.
The point was to allow for the creation of a joint stock company to finish a particular job, such as building a railroad, and once the job was finished the company was dissolved and the government protections were no longer needed.
Smith knew that if corporations were ever allowed to become permanent fixtures in an economy, they would result in disaster.
This is exactly what happened in 1886 when the Supreme Court allowed companies like Southern Pacific Railroad to use the 14th Amendment, which was supposed to protect the constitutional rights of newly freed slaves, as a loophole to declare corporations as “legal persons” with all the protections of an individual citizen.
Not only that, but with limited liability, corporations actually became super-citizens with protections far beyond normal individuals.
Corporations became the preeminent force in the world and it was their relationship with governments that made this possible.
This fact completely debunks today’s notion of what constitutes free markets. Corporations ARE NOT free market structures.
They are, in fact, government chartered and government protected monopolies. They are SOCIALIST creations, not free market creations, and therefore they should not exist in a free market society at all.
The alternative option to corporations was for businesses to form “partnerships”, which did not enjoy protection from government, limited liability or the ability to form monopolies.
When the owners of a partnership committed a crime, they could be personally held liable for that crime. When a corporation commits a crime, only the company as a vaporous faceless entity can be punished.
This is why it is very rare to see company CEOs face prosecution no matter how egregious and catastrophic their actions.
Today, certain corporations continue to enjoy government protections while also enjoying government welfare. Meaning, these companies get a legal shield while also basking in the advantage of tax incentives and taxpayer dollars.
For example, Google (Alphabet and YouTube) has long received huge tax breaks and is rarely if ever forced to pay in full for the massive bandwidth the company uses.
In fact, YouTube was facing bandwidth affordability issues until it was purchased by Alphabet and Google, then it no longer had to worry about it – Google gets over 21 times more bandwidth than it actually pays for because of government intervention.
The same rules apply to companies like Twitter, Facebook, Netflix, Apple, etc. All of them enjoy extensive tax breaks as well as cheap bandwidth that makes it impossible for small and medium sized businesses to compete, even if they operate on a superior model or have superior ideas.
Many times the corporations pay no taxes whatsoever while smaller businesses are crippled by overt payments.
A true free market requires competition as a rule, but the current system deliberately crushes competition. Again, we live in a socialist framework, not a free market framework.
Now that we understand the nature of Big Tech and what these companies actually are (creations of government), the debate on social media censorship changes.
How?
Take for example the fact that public universities in the US are not legally allowed to interfere with free speech rights because many of them survive by consuming taxpayer dollars.
They are PUBLIC institutions, not private. Why then are we treating major corporations that survive on endless taxpayer infusions and incentives as if they are private businesses?
They are not – They are publicly funded structures chartered by the government and therefore they should be subject to the same rules on free speech that universities are required to follow.
Said corporations will surely argue against this and will attempt to use legal chicanery to maintain their monopolies.
Trying to dismantle them could take decades, and there are no guarantees that government officials will even make the attempt? Why would they?
The relationship between government and corporations has been an advantageous one for establishment elites for decades.
The Solution
Instead of challenging the corporate model in the Supreme Court, an easier option would be to simply take away all welfare and tax incentives for any big tech companies that refuse to allow free speech on their platforms.
If Google had to pay normal price for the bandwidth it uses, the corporation would either implode or it would be forced to break apart into multiple smaller companies that would then compete with each other.
More competition means lower prices for consumers along with better products. The threat of losing tax incentives would mean more large companies would refrain from censorship.
Donald Trump as president could conceivably make this happen, but he will not, and neither will any other political official.
The partnership between government and corporations will continue, I believe, because there are other agendas at play here.
The establishment WANTS the public to argue in favor of tech totalitarianism on one side and in favor of government totalitarianism on the other side. They aren’t going to allow any other solutions to enter the discussion.
The only available strategy left for fighting back against big tech is to continue leaving their platforms and building our own. This will take many years to accomplish.
The point is, there is a more permanent option, but it requires a complete deconstruction of the socialist government/corporate framework now in place.
To confront the power dynamic between governments and major conglomerates is to confront one of the fundamental sources of corruption within our society, which is why it won’t be allowed. And when the system refuses to police itself, public upheaval becomes inevitable.


humansarefree--2020-10-23--NASA ‘Whistleblower’ Alleges Space Agency Doctored UFOs Out of Moon Images

A former NASA consultant claims he saw staff from the US space agency editing “ UFOs ” out of images of the Moon before they were released to the public .
Dr Ken Johnston Sr was a consultant employed by Brown & Root in the Lunar Receiving Laboratory , of the NASA Johnson Center in 1971 .
He was involved in storing , curating and cataloguing Apollo images and moon rocks .
One important aspect of his job was to package and ship lunar samples to science labs .
It was during this time that he alleges to have seen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ anomalies and UFOs in lunar photos taken during Apollo missions .
He also claims to have been aware of other anomalies between original photos and films he observed firsthand , and what was catalogued by NASA or made available to the public .
Mr Johnston made the extraordinary claims as he donated photographs and research materials to Roswell ’ s International UFO Museum and Research Center .
The museum has one of the biggest collection of UFO and alien-related material in the world – and was set up to commemorate the July 1947 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the desert outside the New Mexico town .
However , it refuses to comment on individual allegations due to the high volume .
Mr Johnstone is not the first former NASA consultant to make such outlandish claims .
In December Express.co.uk reported how Donna Hare , who claims to have worked for computer and engineering contractor Philco Ford during the early 1970s in NASA ’ s photo labs on and off the site of the group ’ s HQ , said evidence of UFOs in images was destroyed .
She said a security @ @ @ @ @ @ @ burn UFO pictures by mystery armed men , who struck him with the butt of a gun for looking at them .
She also claims to have seen a UFO in a NASA image being airbrushed out by technicians .
Ms Hare also claims to have had a high level of security clearance and was able to access parts of the building known as ‘ Building Eight ’ , which “ gave her contact with a series of high ranking officials who leaked her information in secret over lunch ” .
She claims @ @ @ @ @ @ @ NASA officials who wanted to speak out about the existence of UFOs were threatened with the loss of their pensions and forced to sign gagging orders .

A former NASA consultant claims he saw staff from the US space agency editing “UFOs” out of images of the Moon before they were released to the public.
by Jon Austin
Dr Ken Johnston Sr was a consultant employed by Brown & Root in the Lunar Receiving Laboratory, of the NASA Johnson Center in 1971.
He was involved in storing, curating and cataloguing Apollo images and moon rocks.
One important aspect of his job was to package and ship lunar samples to science labs.
It was during this time that he alleges to have seen NASA photo technicians painting out details of anomalies and UFOs in lunar photos taken during Apollo missions.
He also claims to have been aware of other anomalies between original photos and films he observed firsthand, and what was catalogued by NASA or made available to the public.
Mr Johnston made the extraordinary claims as he donated photographs and research materials to Roswell’s International UFO Museum and Research Center.
The museum has one of the biggest collection of UFO and alien-related material in the world – and was set up to commemorate the July 1947 alleged flying saucer crash that happened in the desert outside the New Mexico town.
However, it refuses to comment on individual allegations due to the high volume.
Mr Johnstone is not the first former NASA consultant to make such outlandish claims.
In December Express.co.uk reported how Donna Hare, who claims to have worked for computer and engineering contractor Philco Ford during the early 1970s in NASA’s photo labs on and off the site of the group’s HQ, said evidence of UFOs in images was destroyed.
She said a security guard told her he was forced to burn UFO pictures by mystery armed men, who struck him with the butt of a gun for looking at them.
She also claims to have seen a UFO in a NASA image being airbrushed out by technicians.
Ms Hare also claims to have had a high level of security clearance and was able to access parts of the building known as ‘Building Eight’, which “gave her contact with a series of high ranking officials who leaked her information in secret over lunch”.
She claims in a video testimony to have learnt NASA officials who wanted to speak out about the existence of UFOs were threatened with the loss of their pensions and forced to sign gagging orders.


humansarefree--2020-10-23--The ‘Great Reset’ is About Replacing Capitalism With Socialism (Under a NWO)

Donald Trump ’ s presidency has so frightened globalists around the world that they are literally pulling out all the stops to destroy him and the greatest country in the history of the world — the United States .
Why ?
Because a powerful , wealthy , stable America , which Trump created before the Wuhan coronavirus , is anathema to the socialist , Marxist authoritarian world they want to create — and then run .
To do that , however , the globalists must first discredit , and then replace , our founding principle of capitalism , the world @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been wildly successful for the majority of people who live under it .
And of course , like other leftists , the globalists are going to exploit the COVID-19 “ pandemic ” to get their way .
The coronavirus crisis presents an opportunity for a “ new kind of capitalism ” and “ great reset ” of global economies , politics , and societies , according to World Economic Forum ( WEF ) founder and executive chairman Klaus Schwab .
In an article published Monday by the WEF , an impatient Schwab claims @ @ @ @ @ @ @ notions of economic capitalism .
In their place is a set of “ Stakeholder Capitalism Metrics ” the WEF says enables the world to progress under one set of overarching rules as drawn up by it , with “ social justice ” a key component of this brave new world .
Let ’ s get some things straight : These multimillionaire and multibillionaire globalists ( like Schwab ) don ’ t give a rat ’ s you-know-what about “ social justice.
” Like the coronavirus , that is just another tool for them @ @ @ @ @ @ @ agenda .
For another , these people are never going to give up their own wealth , but their economic system — socialism or worse , Marxism or Communism — will require that the rest of us surrender whatever wealth we have accumulated to them so they can redistribute it people who don ’ t have as much , so that in the end we ’ re all equally poor ( the exceptions being , of course , the wealthy elitist globalists who ‘ run things ’ ) .
“ No event since @ @ @ @ @ @ @ had as profound a global impact as COVID-19 .
The pandemic has triggered a public health and economic crisis on a scale unseen in generations and has exacerbated systemic problems such as inequality and great-power posturing , ” Schwab wrote .
“ The only acceptable response to such a crisis is to pursue a ‘ Great Reset ’ of our economies , politics , and societies .
“ Indeed , this is a moment to re-evaluate the sacred cows of the pre-pandemic system , but also to defend certain long-held values .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ accomplishments of the past 75 years in a more sustainable form , ” he added .
What , pray tell , is ‘ sustainable ?
’ That would be capitalism .
Sure , sure , there are some truly wealthy people in the world , and many of them are Americans .
But without a doubt , most of them are great people who brought great ideas to market and in doing so offered goods and services that have made our lives better because they filled a need .
Plus , in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is literally waiting to be invented , built and marketed , thereby creating more wealth , jobs and opportunities for more people .
In a socialist/ Marxist economy , there is no wealth , save for those at the top .
There are no opportunities because there is no incentive — no pay-off — to invest in , build and market ‘ the next best thing.
’ When you hear globalists like Schwab call for replacing the world ’ s most copied and most successful economic system using phrases like “ social justice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” know that ’ s not really what they mean .
They just want power .
And they want us to just give it to them .

by JD Heyes
Donald Trump’s presidency has so frightened globalists around the world that they are literally pulling out all the stops to destroy him and the greatest country in the history of the world — the United States.
Why? Because a powerful, wealthy, stable America, which Trump created before the Wuhan coronavirus, is anathema to the socialist, Marxist authoritarian world they want to create — and then run.
To do that, however, the globalists must first discredit, and then replace, our founding principle of capitalism, the world’s only economic model that has been wildly successful for the majority of people who live under it.
And of course, like other leftists, the globalists are going to exploit the COVID-19 “pandemic” to get their way.
Breitbart News reports:
The coronavirus crisis presents an opportunity for a “new kind of capitalism” and “great reset” of global economies, politics, and societies, according to World Economic Forum (WEF) founder and executive chairman Klaus Schwab.
In an article published Monday by the WEF, an impatient Schwab claims neo-liberalism is dead and with it traditional notions of economic capitalism.
In their place is a set of “Stakeholder Capitalism Metrics” the WEF says enables the world to progress under one set of overarching rules as drawn up by it, with “social justice” a key component of this brave new world.
Let’s get some things straight: These multimillionaire and multibillionaire globalists (like Schwab) don’t give a rat’s you-know-what about “social justice.”
Like the coronavirus, that is just another tool for them to exploit in order to enact their agenda.

For another, these people are never going to give up their own wealth, but their economic system — socialism or worse, Marxism or Communism — will require that the rest of us surrender whatever wealth we have accumulated to them so they can redistribute it people who don’t have as much, so that in the end we’re all equally poor (the exceptions being, of course, the wealthy elitist globalists who ‘run things’).
“No event since World War II’s end has had as profound a global impact as COVID-19. The pandemic has triggered a public health and economic crisis on a scale unseen in generations and has exacerbated systemic problems such as inequality and great-power posturing,” Schwab wrote.
“The only acceptable response to such a crisis is to pursue a ‘Great Reset’ of our economies, politics, and societies.
“Indeed, this is a moment to re-evaluate the sacred cows of the pre-pandemic system, but also to defend certain long-held values. The task we face is to preserve the accomplishments of the past 75 years in a more sustainable form,” he added.
What, pray tell, is ‘sustainable?’
That would be capitalism.
Sure, sure, there are some truly wealthy people in the world, and many of them are Americans.
But without a doubt, most of them are great people who brought great ideas to market and in doing so offered goods and services that have made our lives better because they filled a need.
Plus, in a capitalist society, the next best thing is literally waiting to be invented, built and marketed, thereby creating more wealth, jobs and opportunities for more people.
In a socialist/ Marxist economy, there is no wealth, save for those at the top. There are no opportunities because there is no incentive — no pay-off — to invest in, build and market ‘the next best thing.’
When you hear globalists like Schwab call for replacing the world’s most copied and most successful economic system using phrases like “social justice” and buzz terms like “equality,” know that’s not really what they mean.
They just want power. And they want us to just give it to them.


humansarefree--2020-10-24--DNA Results Show the Elongated Paracas Skulls Are Not Native American

“ The Paracas were an incredibly complex ethnic mix of people… There are a number of different haplogroups that were found in the DNA tests of the Paracas elongated skulls and these haplogroups , which is your genetic ancestry , they don ’ t fit in with the history of Peru in any shape or form… ” According to a group of experts dealing with the Paracas skull phenomenon , recent DNA results have revealed that the elongated skulls of Paracas , Peru , are not native to the region .
During the 1920 ’ s , a Peruvian archaeologist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ series of tombs in Paracas Peru .
The contents of the tomb left experts stumped as countless elongated skulls were recovered from the tombs .
Since then , more elongated skulls have been found in the region , raising numerous questions about these mysterious people .
For more than five years have experts like Brien Foerster tried solving the mystery behind the elongated skulls .
While much progress has been made in understanding them , the journey has been very difficult .
After countless studies and research , we have begun finding out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ DNA analysis has shown that the elongation present on the Paracas skulls was not the result of artificial cranial deformation but by genetics .
Some of the Paracas Skulls have a cranial volume which is up to 25 % larger and 60 % percent heavier than conventional human skulls .
While ‘ head binding ’ can alter the shape of the skull , it can not alter its volume .
The Most Fascinating Paracas Mummy Found So Far : Newborn baby with elongated skull , suggests that thousands of years ago , an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with naturally elongated skulls .
At the end of last week , a Symposium was held in Los Angeles where experts announced new results of testing performed on the elongated Skulls .
The main speakers of the event were L.A. Marzulli and Brien Foerster .
As reported by Megalith Marvels , Foerster , author of several books on the subject and a recognized expert of the Paracas Skulls , published the following information on the aforementioned DNA results .
“ The DNA results actually were incredibly complicated… It ’ s going to take @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what the results mean .
“ What it does show for sure is that the Paracas elongated skull people were not 100 % Native American .
They were a mix or even you could say , in some ways , a hybrid of different people.
” “ Their blood types are very complicated as well , they should be blood type “ O ” if they ’ re 100 % Native American and that ’ s not the case .
We are likely looking at a sub-species of humanity as regards to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of DNA evidence from extreme eastern Europe and extreme western Asia .
More specifically I ’ m talking about the area in between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea where ancient elongated skull people lived I think about 3000 years ago .
”

“The Paracas were an incredibly complex ethnic mix of people… There are a number of different haplogroups that were found in the DNA tests of the Paracas elongated skulls and these haplogroups, which is your genetic ancestry, they don’t fit in with the history of Peru in any shape or form…”
According to a group of experts dealing with the Paracas skull phenomenon, recent DNA results have revealed that the elongated skulls of Paracas, Peru, are not native to the region.
During the 1920’s, a Peruvian archaeologist by the name Julio Tello discovered a series of tombs in Paracas Peru.
The contents of the tomb left experts stumped as countless elongated skulls were recovered from the tombs.
Since then, more elongated skulls have been found in the region, raising numerous questions about these mysterious people.
For more than five years have experts like Brien Foerster tried solving the mystery behind the elongated skulls. While much progress has been made in understanding them, the journey has been very difficult.
After countless studies and research, we have begun finding out more about these mystery skulls.
Some DNA analysis has shown that the elongation present on the Paracas skulls was not the result of artificial cranial deformation but by genetics.
Some of the Paracas Skulls have a cranial volume which is up to 25% larger and 60% percent heavier than conventional human skulls.
While ‘head binding’ can alter the shape of the skull, it cannot alter its volume.
The Most Fascinating Paracas Mummy Found So Far: Newborn baby with elongated skull, suggests that thousands of years ago, an ancient race of people lived in Peru with naturally elongated skulls.
At the end of last week, a Symposium was held in Los Angeles where experts announced new results of testing performed on the elongated Skulls.
The main speakers of the event were L.A. Marzulli and Brien Foerster.
As reported by Megalith Marvels, Foerster, author of several books on the subject and a recognized expert of the Paracas Skulls, published the following information on the aforementioned DNA results.
“The DNA results actually were incredibly complicated… It’s going to take me some time to actually figure out what the results mean.
“What it does show for sure is that the Paracas elongated skull people were not 100% Native American. They were a mix or even you could say, in some ways, a hybrid of different people.”
More question than answers…
Foerster explains that:
“Their blood types are very complicated as well, they should be blood type “O” if they’re 100% Native American and that’s not the case. We are likely looking at a sub-species of humanity as regards to the Paracas…
“Seems to be a lot of DNA evidence from extreme eastern Europe and extreme western Asia. More specifically I’m talking about the area in between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea where ancient elongated skull people lived I think about 3000 years ago.”
Reference: Ancient-code.com


humansarefree--2020-10-23--FDA Lets Pfizer Test Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine on U.S. Children

Americans have been following COVID-19 vaccine trial developments for weeks , watching companies jockey for frontrunner status like contestants in a reality TV show .
And though participants in some of the studies ( by Moderna , Oxford , Johnson & Johnson and Pfizer ) have surfaced with reactions serious enough to pause several of the trials , market analysts remain “ bullish ” about the near-term prospects for approval of these liability-free products by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) .
On Oct. 16 , Pfizer ’ s CEO indicated the company would likely file for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ BNT162b2 vaccine in late November .
That statement came three days after Pfizer announced that it had received FDA permission to administer the unproven vaccine to children as young as 12 , becoming the first company in the U.S. to include young participants in Phase 3 trials .
In the UK , Oxford and AstraZeneca gained approval to test their vaccine in children aged 5-12 back in May , a couple of months before two of their adult clinical trial participants developed transverse myelitis .
To date , Pfizer has administered two doses @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in five countries .
Unworried by the dramatic side effects reported by some of these adults — including high fever , pounding headaches , body aches , exhaustion and shivering intense enough to crack teeth — more than 90 parents have already expressed interest in volunteering their teenagers .
Are these parents ( perhaps left unemployed by coronavirus restrictions ) tempted by the financial incentives offered to clinical trial participants , reportedly anywhere from $ 1200 to $ 2000 ?
Otherwise , their motivation for wanting to throw their children into the experimental @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the Cincinnati Children ’ s Hospital stated , “ most of the time , what a coronavirus causes is a cold ” that does not even make children “ sick enough to where a parent says they need to go to a doctor.
” The Cincinnati physician has , nonetheless , just started giving Pfizer ’ s shot to 16- and 17-year-olds ( and soon to 12-15-year-olds ) .
To entice additional young participants , he tells parents that the COVID-19 death rate in children is “ not zero ” — but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , the survival rate in those age 19 and under is 99.997 % .
Using similarly vague language , a Memorial Sloan-Kettering health policy expert said that a COVID-19 vaccine ’ s benefits for the young would likely be “ secondary ’ in nature ” but characterized the gesture as “ an act of service to help protect others.
” However , reports in Pediatrics and other journals assert that children are not a source of infection and are far more likely to acquire COVID-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to them.
” In other words , policymakers expect children to accept a risk-benefit equation heavily tilted toward risk .
Pharmaceutical giant Pfizer — the second-largest drug and biotech company in the world and the fourth-highest earner of vaccine revenues — has seen a 7 % increase in its share value this year .
However , though Pfizer claims to be a standard-bearer for “ quality , safety and value , ” it has a corporate rap sheet a mile long .
Pfizer is routinely mired in controversies involving alleged price-fixing , bribery @ @ @ @ @ @ @ misdirection and other unsavory practices and has also repeatedly paid fines for environmental violations at its research and manufacturing plants .
Critics point to decades of aggressive and questionable marketing .
In 2009 , this behavior earned Pfizer the dubious distinction of paying the largest-ever criminal fine at the time — $ 2.3 billion — for fraudulent and illegal promotion of four drugs , including a painkiller marketed at “ dangerously high ” doses .
In 2016 , a British regulator levied a $ 106 million fine against Pfizer for a 2600 % @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prescribed anti-epilepsy drug that increased the National Health Services ’ expenditures from one year to the next — for a single drug—from $ 2.5 million to $ 63 million .
Perhaps to compensate for its unpleasant track record , Pfizer is the top drug company spender in state elections , even outspending the industry ’ s own lobbying group , Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America ( PhRM ) .
As a just-published analysis of drug company political spending by STAT and the National Institute on Money and Politics shows , Pfizer ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ $ 778,000 since January 2019 ) “ mirrors its behavior at the federal level , where its [ political action committee ] was also the top political spender among drug companies ” — roughly $ 1 million over the same time period .
The report pointedly notes that while the amounts paid out to legislators represent a “ pittance ” for a company earning tens of billions a year , “ those small chunks of corporate change can have a significant impact.
” Pfizer is responsible for two vaccines on the U.S. childhood @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine Prevnar-13 ( given to children under 5 and also to older adults ) and the meningococcal vaccine Trumenba ( approved for 10 – 25-year-olds ) .
Package inserts link the two vaccines to a large number of serious adverse events , including anaphylaxis and other allergic reactions , severe headaches and chronic muscle and joint pain .
Among the roughly 40 harms listed in the Prevnar-13 insert are sudden infant death syndrome ( SIDS ) and half a dozen other fatal outcomes .
Pfizer developed its COVID-19 vaccine — which uses experimental @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in partnership with the German biopharma company BioNTech .
Although mRNA vaccines must be stored in special ultra-low-temperature freezers that pose certain logistic obstacles , Pfizer is gung-ho on the never-before-approved approach because it bypasses the more costly and difficult methods used in traditional vaccine production .
It does this by essentially turning recipients into “ vaccine factories ” — with long-term risks that are unknown .
Pfizer and BioNTech brought their COVID-19 vaccine candidates “ from concept into clinical development ” in under three months , perhaps helped along by the current @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pfizer into a more “ nimble ” company .
At the same time , observers who now place Pfizer at the head of the pack for COVID-19 vaccines credit the company ’ s “ well-oiled system , ” remarking that “ Pfizer ’ s incredibly organized and is always … a couple steps ahead , planning where they want to go.
” In the summer of 2019 , after having served as the Trump administration ’ s FDA commissioner for two years , Scott Gottlieb passed through the revolving door to join Pfizer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as becoming a regular contributor on CNBC .
For the past four decades , stepping onto pharmaceutical boards has been par for the coursefor departing FDA commissioners , though Gottlieb may have upped the ante by also joining the boards of the AI- and big-data-reliant genetic testing start-up , Tempus , and the biotech company Illumina .
While at the FDA , Gottlieb presided over a record number of drug approvals .
According to one commentator , this “ trail-blazing ” FDA stint and Gottlieb ’ s focus on “ hustling upthe [ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ him to the industry , making him one of the most popular commissioners in FDA history.
” As the director of a consumer watchdog group put it , “ He ’ s basically been a shill for pharmaceutical corporations for much of his career.
” Two months before stepping down from the agency , Gottlieb attracted notice when he strongly denied any link between vaccines and autism while publicly threatening that the federal government might be “ forced ” to intervene in states with vaccine exemptions to make vaccines mandatory across the board @ @ @ @ @ @ @ may explain why he has been a frequent public face during the coronavirus pandemic , promoting the U.S. as a world leader in the vaccine race but also vocally endorsing measures like universal masking , universal testing and restaurant and school shutdowns .
On October 19 , Gottlieb dourly told Americans that the U.S. is “ entering a pretty difficult period ” and that “ the hardest part is probably [ still ] ahead.
” Ironically , around the same time that Gottlieb was using positive test results to hype ongoing restrictive measures @ @ @ @ @ @ @ science officer in the UK characterized mass testing as “ inappropriate , ” asserting that “ it is impossible for the positives to be much other than false.
” Discussing the harsh policies that have been particularly disastrous for children , the former Pfizer executive agreed that they have essentially been based on “ completely fake data.
” Reporter Whitney Webb recently outlined how Operation Warp Speed is awarding contracts to vaccine companies through a nongovernmental defense contractor intermediary , a tactic that shields the contracts from oversight and federal regulation .
Meanwhile @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Operation Warp Speed initiative — stated that after a round of testing in adolescents , he expects the leading coronavirus vaccines to also be tested in toddlers and babies .
Parents would do well to keep their children on the sidelines of these experiments .
If vaccine clinical trials , including Pfizer ’ s , are already generating concerning results in adults capable of describing their symptoms , what will happen when preverbal babies experience similar adverse outcomes ?

According to the Israeli Health Ministry over 12,400 residents have tested positive for COVID-19 after being vaccinated with experimental Pfizer COVID-19 jjab shots.
He stated that at this stage it is still difficult to draw definitive conclusions about the effectiveness of the jjab, for better or worse.
Over 12,400 Israeli residents have tested positive for COVID-19 after being vaccinated, among them 69 people who had already gotten the second dose, which began to be administered early last week, the Israeli Health Ministry reported.
Of the 3,199 people who took coronavirus tests between day 22 and day 28 after the first jjab, 84 were found to be positive (2.6 percent), including 69 people who had already been vaccinated twice.
At this stage it is still difficult to draw definitive conclusions about the effectiveness of the jjab, for better or worse.
In some groups of inoculated people during the different post-jjab periods, the ratio of positive tests corresponds to the ratio of positive tests in the general population, the overwhelming majority of whom were not yet vaccinated.
There could also be issues related to the fact that most of those vaccinated first and who have thus accumulated the most post-vaccination time are over 60 years old.
According to Pfizer, the big jump in immunity is meant to come between day 15 and day 21, when the jjab’s effectiveness is meant to go from 52 percent to 89 percent, after which the second dose is meant to bring the vaccinated percent to a state of 95 percent protection.
But these statistics, encouraging as they are, cannot determine the level of protection the jjab grants each individual person.
Moreover, the more people are vaccinated, the more likely gaps will be found between Pfizer’s results in its clinical trials and results in the field, not just with regard to the level of the jjab’s effectiveness for individuals, but regarding its general effectiveness and ability to provide “herd immunity.”
This is especially true since it still isn’t clear to what degree the jjab protects against mutations of the virus.
Few days ago, the Louisiana woman who suffered uncontrollable convulsions after being administered the experimental Pfizer COVID-19 jjab was screened for permanent brain damage caused by the metals in the jjab.
Her son Brant Griner said that the hospital determined that she was experiencing a “neurological reaction,” he said, adding that doctors believe the medical condition was caused by “the metals in the jjab.”
As reported by GreatGameIndia earlier, Pfizer has paid $2.3 billion in the largest healthcare fraud settlement in history to resolve criminal and civil liability arising from the illegal promotion of certain pharmaceutical products.
Even, the US government paid over $57 million in compensation for jjab injuries and deaths until March 2020, and over $1 Billion in the past five years.
According to the co-founder of BioNTech Dr Ugur Sahin, the COVID-19 jjab he designed for Pfizer was designed in just few hours in a single day on January 25, 2020. No other jjab in history has been created and manufactured so quickly. Previously, the fastest jjab ever developed took more than four years.
Even, Moderna’s coronavirus jjab also took just two days to design.
According to pharma giant Moderna, the COVID-19 mRNA based experimental jabs are Operating System designed to program human DNA. These jjabs are being approved for emergency use for the first time in history.


humansarefree--2020-10-23--Sweden Refuses to Impose New Lockdown Measures:  ‘People Have Suffered Enough’

Health authorities in Sweden have refused to follow the rest of Europe by imposing new coronavirus lockdown measures on their population , arguing that those beset by loneliness and misery of being isolated have suffered enough .
Despite Sweden mirroring other countries on the continent with rising coronavirus infections , the government has held firm in refusing to lockdown its population , weighing the untold misery and health impacts of isolation against the threat of COVID-19 .
Sweden : No Hard Lockdowns , Masks , Or Social Distancing and One of the Lowest COVID-19 Fatality Rate In Europe “ The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enough , ” writes Fraser Nelson .
“ They have spent months being advised to avoid public transport , shopping malls and other parts of everyday life .
And the result ?
Loneliness .
Misery .
This is more than unpleasant : it quickly translates into depression , mental health issues and mortality .
“ We can not only think about infection control , ” said Lena Hallengren , Sweden ’ s health minister , ‘ we also need to think about public health.
’ An important distinction : focus on Covid to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ risk lives.
” Hallengren ’ s 21 page report also uncovered a “ decline in mental health ” that was “ likely to worsen the longer the recommendations remain in place , ” leading officials to lift lockdown restrictions that previously applied to over-70s .
After deciding to take a “ herd immunity ” approach to COVID-19 at the start of the pandemic , Sweden was roundly condemned for not following the harsh lockdowns imposed by virtually every other major European country .
However , as Newsweek acknowledged , Sweden ’ s COVID-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Spain , the UK and Italy , countries which all imposed draconian lockdowns .
Unlike the rest of the continent , Sweden ’ s economy is also in a far better position to make a swifter recovery .
The country ’ s senior epidemiologist Anders Tengell has also criticized the wearing of face masks as “ very dangerous ” because it gives a false sense of security but does not effectively stem the spread of the virus .

Health authorities in Sweden have refused to follow the rest of Europe by imposing new coronavirus lockdown measures on their population, arguing that those beset by loneliness and misery of being isolated have suffered enough.
Despite Sweden mirroring other countries on the continent with rising coronavirus infections, the government has held firm in refusing to lockdown its population, weighing the untold misery and health impacts of isolation against the threat of COVID-19.
Sweden: No Hard Lockdowns, Masks, Or Social Distancing and One of the Lowest COVID-19 Fatality Rate In Europe
“The elderly, they said, have suffered enough,” writes Fraser Nelson.
“They have spent months being advised to avoid public transport, shopping malls and other parts of everyday life. And the result? Loneliness. Misery. This is more than unpleasant: it quickly translates into depression, mental health issues and mortality.
“We cannot only think about infection control,” said Lena Hallengren, Sweden’s health minister, ‘we also need to think about public health.’ An important distinction: focus on Covid to the exclusion of other conditions and you risk lives.”
Hallengren’s 21 page report also uncovered a “decline in mental health” that was “likely to worsen the longer the recommendations remain in place,” leading officials to lift lockdown restrictions that previously applied to over-70s.
After deciding to take a “herd immunity” approach to COVID-19 at the start of the pandemic, Sweden was roundly condemned for not following the harsh lockdowns imposed by virtually every other major European country.
However, as Newsweek acknowledged, Sweden’s COVID-19 death rate is lower than those of Spain, the UK and Italy, countries which all imposed draconian lockdowns.
Unlike the rest of the continent, Sweden’s economy is also in a far better position to make a swifter recovery.
The country’s senior epidemiologist Anders Tengell has also criticized the wearing of face masks as “very dangerous” because it gives a false sense of security but does not effectively stem the spread of the virus.
Source: Summit.news


humansarefree--2020-10-23--Dr. Anthony Fauci Opposes Controlled Study on Effectiveness of Masks

Dr. Anthony Fauci said Tuesday he opposes conducting a controlled study on the effectiveness of masks to prevent the spread of the coronavirus .
Fauci discussed the idea during a conversation with students of Georgetown University ’ s Institute of Politics and Public Service .
One student asked if it is possible to do a study in the midst of a pandemic about the effectiveness of wearing masks .
“ What kind of studies can we do right now in the middle of the pandemic about masks and transmission of the disease ?
” the student asked .
“ Or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because we are not able to do those kind of studies right now ?
” Fauci said there are enough “ meta-analyses ” of existing data showing the efficacy of masks .
“ Right now , I ’ m convinced enough in the summation and totality of the data that has been analyzed by meta-analysis that I ’ m convinced that the benefit of wearing a mask clearly is there and is better than not wearing a mask , ” he said : Time for an Investigation : Dr. Fauci And NIAID Accused @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Virus In theory , a randomized controlled study would test the spread of the virus among people wearing masks versus people not wearing masks and possibly scientifically demonstrate the effectiveness of wearing one .
But Fauci balked at the idea .
“ I would not want to do a randomized controlled study because that would mean having people not wear masks and see if they do better , ” he said .
Fauci suggested he would never ask an individual to participate in a study that would involve not wearing a mask .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ study would be kind of difficult to do because then you ’ d have to tell people not to wear masks , and I ’ m not about to tell them that , ” he said .

Dr. Anthony Fauci said Tuesday he opposes conducting a controlled study on the effectiveness of masks to prevent the spread of the coronavirus.
Fauci discussed the idea during a conversation with students of Georgetown University’s Institute of Politics and Public Service.
One student asked if it is possible to do a study in the midst of a pandemic about the effectiveness of wearing masks.
“What kind of studies can we do right now in the middle of the pandemic about masks and transmission of the disease?” the student asked.
“Or are we just relying on anecdotal evidence because we are not able to do those kind of studies right now?”
Fauci said there are enough “meta-analyses” of existing data showing the efficacy of masks.
“Right now, I’m convinced enough in the summation and totality of the data that has been analyzed by meta-analysis that I’m convinced that the benefit of wearing a mask clearly is there and is better than not wearing a mask,” he said:
Time for an Investigation: Dr. Fauci And NIAID Accused Of Collaboration With China On The COVID-19 Virus
In theory, a randomized controlled study would test the spread of the virus among people wearing masks versus people not wearing masks and possibly scientifically demonstrate the effectiveness of wearing one.
But Fauci balked at the idea.
“I would not want to do a randomized controlled study because that would mean having people not wear masks and see if they do better,” he said.
Fauci suggested he would never ask an individual to participate in a study that would involve not wearing a mask.
“I think that to do the study would be kind of difficult to do because then you’d have to tell people not to wear masks, and I’m not about to tell them that,” he said.
Source: Breitbart.com


humansarefree--2020-10-23--Timeline Ties the Bidens, Soros and Even Barack Obama to Ukrainian Affairs Starting in 2014

We ’ ve reported on George Soros and his actions that have destroyed the US from within for years .
Anti American George Soros was interviewed by 60 Minutes years ago .
In this infamous interview Soros claimed to have no shame for turning in fellow Jews to the Nazis in World War II Hungary .
The Nazis stole from the Jews and Soros claimed that if he didn ’ t turn in Jews to the Nazis , someone else would have .
Notice that in this interview from 20 years ago , Soros was already involved in Ukraine : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ George Soros was reportedly behind the airport protests .
A week before that Soros was reportedly behind 50 Groups involved in the ‘ Women ’ s Protests ’ the day after the inauguration .
Before that , Soros was connected to the groups demanding election recounts after the November 8th , 2016 , election and Soros money was funding more protests during these efforts .
And there was information showing that Soros funded Black Lives Matter protests across the country before that .
[ In fact , America is Under Attack by No @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Soros ] .
But between 2013 and the election of 2016 Soros was involved in Ukraine along with former President Obama and his Vice President Joe Biden and his family .
[ As a matter of fact , George Soros was/is listed as the 2nd most influential figure in Ukraine ] .
Here is the relevant timeline parts that deserve explaining : February 14 , 2014 , VP Joe Biden named by President Obama to be the point man on all things Ukraine .
April 13 , 2014 , Ukrainian energy company Burisma @ @ @ @ @ @ @ business partner Devon Archer who also served as a senior advisor to Secretary-of-State John Kerry .
Archer was also the college roommate of CJ Heinz , Kerry ’ s stepson .
April 15 , 2014 , Burisma Holdings sends two payments to Hunter Biden and Devon Archer ’ s Morgan Stanley account of their Rosemont Seneca Bohai ( RSB ) Investment fund .
This business was greatly enhanced through a loan from the Bank of China in November 2013 when Hunter traveled on air Force II with the vice president who had a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The loan for $ 1.5B went to Biden and Archer ’ s RSB firm which had collaborated their business with their new venture partner James Bulger who headed the Thornton Group .
Biden , Archer and Bulger appeared to have started this merger ( via a loan ) on November 10 , 2011 when they met with several Chinese government fund leaders in Washington just hours before his father met with then Chinese President Hu Jintao .
Hunter would then meet with other top Chinese officials in Taiwan just two weeks later @ @ @ @ @ @ @ corroborate with this new disturbing report .
One of the two Burisma payments to the account was for $ 29,242.82 and the other payment was for $ 83,333.33 which happens to be the “ future ” salary payment for Hunter Biden who would not be announced as a hired member to the Burisma Holdings board of directors for another 28 days .
April 22 , 2014 , Joe Biden meets with Ukrainian PM Yatsenyuk to urge him to foster Ukrainian natural gas production increases – now just three weeks from ( already paid @ @ @ @ @ @ @ board of directors at Burisma energy , the nation ’ s largest private energy company .
May 13 , 2014 , Hunter Biden is announced as a board member for Burisma Holdings .
Emails released on Saturday , October 17 , 2020 showed Burisma advisor Vadim Pozharskyi orchestrating a meeting for Hunter Biden to lobby for Burisma at the State Department and he directed Hunter to use his father ’ s position in government to influence a stop to all Burisma probes .
Another interesting development on May 13 , 2014 , CJ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ make it clear that he should not be considered as having anything to do with his business partners Archer and Biden ’ s acquired and lucrative positions with Burisma .
May 20 , 2014 , keeping it in the family ?
David Leiter former Kerry chief-of staff joins the party at Burisma .
He is hired as a lobbyist and was paid $ 90,000 in 2014 to lobby the State Department , run by his most recent employer , Secretary-of-State John Kerry .
Clearly despite Hunter Biden ’ s original claim that he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to help them in “ transparency issues ” , not to influence the US government in any manner .
Time magazine points out the awfully cringy timing of the lobbyist hiring to do just that only a week after Hunter was hired .
July 5 , 2014 , Burisma holdings pays $ 250,000 to Bois Schiller law firm where coincidentally , board member Hunter Biden also worked at the time .
Another payment of $ 33,039.77 was made on September 16th of that year .
( Kind of brings humor into the transparency @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 20 , 2014 , Ukrainian Prosecutor General , opens a criminal investigation against Burisma Holdings .
*According to the records of the prosecutor general ’ s case file .
January 18 , 2015 , new Prosecutor General , Viktor Shokin ’ prosecutors name Burisma Holdings founder Mykola Zlochevsky a fugitive of Ukrainian justice .
January 29 , 2015 , British Serious Fraud Office announces it is closing their investigation of Burisma holdings fraud .
July 22 , 2015 , Hunter Biden meets with Tony Blinken , the Deputy Secretary-of-State and former national security @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the meeting in an email to get Blinken ’ s “ advise on several matters.
” August 18 , 2015 , despite President Obama praising natural gas since his campaigning for president in 2008 , he cracked down on American natural gas exploration and declared mandates which put heavy financial burdens on these companies , raising natural gas prices globally .
The president ’ s steadfast preference for the cleaner burning NG energy falls apart and reverses just months after VP Joe Biden encouraged Ukrainian expansion of natural gas exploration and production where @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the nation ’ s largest private energy company and one that , along with Russia , would gain considerable market share and enjoy increased natural gas prices as a result of the Obama energy mandate on American energy companies .
Rudy Giuliani , the former mayor of New York and President Trump ’ s attorney , shared in an interview in February 2020 that the corruption in the Ukraine doesn ’ t stop with Obama and the Bidens .
It also involves George Soros – ( at the 2 minute mark ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Ukraine , it was big enough that Soros got himself involved in the Russia collusion sham investigation after President Trump ’ s election .
Billionaire George Soros and a group of wealthy donors from New York and California have paid $ 50 million to sustain an ongoing private Russia investigation conducted by former British spy Christopher Steele , research firm Fusion GPS , and a former staffer for Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein .
The revelation is part of the final report on Russian interference in the 2016 election released on April 27 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ report concluded that there is no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia .
A footnote in the report states that Daniel Jones , the former Feinstein staffer who runs the Penn Quarter Group ( PQG ) , told the FBI in March 2017 that he is working on a project with Fusion GPS that “ was being funded by 7 to 10 wealthy donors located primarily in New York and California , who provided approximately $ 50 million.
” One thing that we now know are reports Soros wanted to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the Ukraine .
According to John Solomon at the Hill : Liberal mega-donor George Soros made some big bets during the last U.S. presidential election .
One was that Hillary Clinton would win the presidency .
Another was that he could reshape Ukraine ’ s government to his liking , and that his business empire might find fertile ground in that former Soviet state .
So when Donald Trump ’ s improbable march to the White House picked up steam in the spring of 2016 , Team Soros marched to the top @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of those investments , according to newly released department memos providing a rare glimpse into the Democratic donor ’ s extraordinary access to the Obama administration .
Then-Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland received repeated calls , emails and meeting requests from Soros , according to the memos obtained under the Freedom of Information Act by the conservative group Citizens United .
Likewise , Soros set out a bold vision in an internal 2014 memo for his Open Society Foundation to help root out corruption in Ukraine and build a “ civil society @ @ @ @ @ @ @ country ’ s Russia-friendly president .
It worked with U.S. Department of Justice ( DOJ ) officials to leverage the so-called Kleptocracy Initiative to fight corruption .
The initiative enabled DOJ to prosecute or seek asset forfeitures from foreigners suspected of corruption , even if the crimes didn ’ t technically occur on U.S. soil .
Such initiatives are noble in principle .
But in Ukraine , some targets had political and business implications as well .
For example , one DOJ investigation in 2014 targeted Ukrainian oligarch Dmitri Firtash .
He and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Europe — and rival plans to rebuild Ukraine .
After Firtash ’ s indictment , Soros ’ s business announced plans to invest $ 1 billion in Ukraine .
Since then , significant problems have arisen with the DOJ ’ s case , thwarting efforts to extradite Firtash to the U.S. for trial .
And when Ukraine ’ s general prosecutor sought to investigate one of the country ’ s nonprofits partially funded by Soros during 2016 , the State Department pressured Ukrainian officials to drop the case .
This last piece by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to in his comments about Soros in the Ukraine .
The Obama State Department intervened in the Ukraine and stopped the case against Soros .
Based on Rudy ’ s comments , it is likely he has support for Obama ’ s State Department actions .

We’ve reported on George Soros and his actions that have destroyed the US from within for years.
Anti American George Soros was interviewed by 60 Minutes years ago. In this infamous interview Soros claimed to have no shame for turning in fellow Jews to the Nazis in World War II Hungary.
The Nazis stole from the Jews and Soros claimed that if he didn’t turn in Jews to the Nazis, someone else would have.
Notice that in this interview from 20 years ago, Soros was already involved in Ukraine:
After President Trump’s election, George Soros was reportedly behind the airport protests. A week before that Soros was reportedly behind 50 Groups involved in the ‘Women’s Protests’ the day after the inauguration.
Before that, Soros was connected to the groups demanding election recounts after the November 8th, 2016, election and Soros money was funding more protests during these efforts.
And there was information showing that Soros funded Black Lives Matter protests across the country before that.
[In fact, America is Under Attack by No Less Than 187 Groups Funded by George Soros].
But between 2013 and the election of 2016 Soros was involved in Ukraine along with former President Obama and his Vice President Joe Biden and his family.
[As a matter of fact, George Soros was/is listed as the 2nd most influential figure in Ukraine].
Here is the relevant timeline parts that deserve explaining:
February 14, 2014, VP Joe Biden named by President Obama to be the point man on all things Ukraine.
February 21, 2014, George Soros’ ‘Open Society’ publishes an anti-corruption strategy for Ukraine
April 13, 2014, Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings announces the hiring of Hunter Biden business partner Devon Archer who also served as a senior advisor to Secretary-of-State John Kerry. Archer was also the college roommate of CJ Heinz, Kerry’s stepson.
April 15, 2014, Burisma Holdings sends two payments to Hunter Biden and Devon Archer’s Morgan Stanley account of their Rosemont Seneca Bohai (RSB) Investment fund.
This business was greatly enhanced through a loan from the Bank of China in November 2013 when Hunter traveled on air Force II with the vice president who had a scheduled meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping.
The loan for $1.5B went to Biden and Archer’s RSB firm which had collaborated their business with their new venture partner James Bulger who headed the Thornton Group.
Biden, Archer and Bulger appeared to have started this merger (via a loan) on November 10, 2011 when they met with several Chinese government fund leaders in Washington just hours before his father met with then Chinese President Hu Jintao.
Hunter would then meet with other top Chinese officials in Taiwan just two weeks later according to the secret Service report and corroborate with this new disturbing report.
One of the two Burisma payments to the account was for $29,242.82 and the other payment was for $83,333.33 which happens to be the “future” salary payment for Hunter Biden who would not be announced as a hired member to the Burisma Holdings board of directors for another 28 days.
April 22, 2014, Joe Biden meets with Ukrainian PM Yatsenyuk to urge him to foster Ukrainian natural gas production increases – now just three weeks from (already paid) Hunter Biden being named to the board of directors at Burisma energy, the nation’s largest private energy company.
May 13, 2014, Hunter Biden is announced as a board member for Burisma Holdings.
Emails released on Saturday, October 17, 2020 showed Burisma advisor Vadim Pozharskyi orchestrating a meeting for Hunter Biden to lobby for Burisma at the State Department and he directed Hunter to use his father’s position in government to influence a stop to all Burisma probes.
Another interesting development on May 13, 2014, CJ Heinz went out of his way to make it clear that he should not be considered as having anything to do with his business partners Archer and Biden’s acquired and lucrative positions with Burisma.
A Strange (suspicious) measure and a curious statement to secretary Kerry’s top aides.
May 20, 2014, keeping it in the family? David Leiter former Kerry chief-of staff joins the party at Burisma.
He is hired as a lobbyist and was paid $90,000 in 2014 to lobby the State Department, run by his most recent employer, Secretary-of-State John Kerry.
Clearly despite Hunter Biden’s original claim that he was hired by Burisma for legal purposes to help them in “transparency issues”, not to influence the US government in any manner.
Time magazine points out the awfully cringy timing of the lobbyist hiring to do just that only a week after Hunter was hired.
July 5, 2014, Burisma holdings pays $250,000 to Bois Schiller law firm where coincidentally, board member Hunter Biden also worked at the time.
Another payment of $33,039.77 was made on September 16th of that year. (Kind of brings humor into the transparency effort made by Hunter.)
August 20, 2014, Ukrainian Prosecutor General, opens a criminal investigation against Burisma Holdings. *According to the records of the prosecutor general’s case file.
January 18, 2015, new Prosecutor General, Viktor Shokin’ prosecutors name Burisma Holdings founder Mykola Zlochevsky a fugitive of Ukrainian justice.
January 29, 2015, British Serious Fraud Office announces it is closing their investigation of Burisma holdings fraud.
(A curious declaration just eleven days after Ukraine’s own justice department announces the founder a fugitive evading criminal prosecution.)
July 22, 2015, Hunter Biden meets with Tony Blinken, the Deputy Secretary-of-State and former national security advisor to Joe Biden.
Hunter requested the meeting in an email to get Blinken’s “advise on several matters.”
August 18, 2015, despite President Obama praising natural gas since his campaigning for president in 2008, he cracked down on American natural gas exploration and declared mandates which put heavy financial burdens on these companies, raising natural gas prices globally.
The president’s steadfast preference for the cleaner burning NG energy falls apart and reverses just months after VP Joe Biden encouraged Ukrainian expansion of natural gas exploration and production where his son Hunter is on the board of the nation’s largest private energy company and one that, along with Russia, would gain considerable market share and enjoy increased natural gas prices as a result of the Obama energy mandate on American energy companies.
Rudy Giuliani, the former mayor of New York and President Trump’s attorney, shared in an interview in February 2020 that the corruption in the Ukraine doesn’t stop with Obama and the Bidens. It also involves George Soros – (at the 2 minute mark):
Whatever Soros was involved with in the Ukraine, it was big enough that Soros got himself involved in the Russia collusion sham investigation after President Trump’s election.
The Epoch Times reported:
Billionaire George Soros and a group of wealthy donors from New York and California have paid $50 million to sustain an ongoing private Russia investigation conducted by former British spy Christopher Steele, research firm Fusion GPS, and a former staffer for Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein.
The revelation is part of the final report on Russian interference in the 2016 election released on April 27 by the House intelligence committee.
The report concluded that there is no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
A footnote in the report states that Daniel Jones, the former Feinstein staffer who runs the Penn Quarter Group (PQG), told the FBI in March 2017 that he is working on a project with Fusion GPS that “was being funded by 7 to 10 wealthy donors located primarily in New York and California, who provided approximately $50 million.”
One thing that we now know are reports Soros wanted to take over the oil and gas industry in the Ukraine.
According to John Solomon at the Hill:
Liberal mega-donor George Soros made some big bets during the last U.S. presidential election. One was that Hillary Clinton would win the presidency.
Another was that he could reshape Ukraine’s government to his liking, and that his business empire might find fertile ground in that former Soviet state.
So when Donald Trump’s improbable march to the White House picked up steam in the spring of 2016, Team Soros marched to the top of the State Department to protect some of those investments, according to newly released department memos providing a rare glimpse into the Democratic donor’s extraordinary access to the Obama administration.
Then-Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland received repeated calls, emails and meeting requests from Soros, according to the memos obtained under the Freedom of Information Act by the conservative group Citizens United.
Solomon continued:
Likewise, Soros set out a bold vision in an internal 2014 memo for his Open Society Foundation to help root out corruption in Ukraine and build a “civil society” after the Maidan Revolution ousted the country’s Russia-friendly president.
It worked with U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) officials to leverage the so-called Kleptocracy Initiative to fight corruption.
The initiative enabled DOJ to prosecute or seek asset forfeitures from foreigners suspected of corruption, even if the crimes didn’t technically occur on U.S. soil.
Such initiatives are noble in principle. But in Ukraine, some targets had political and business implications as well.
For example, one DOJ investigation in 2014 targeted Ukrainian oligarch Dmitri Firtash. He and Soros both have significant energy interests in Europe — and rival plans to rebuild Ukraine. After Firtash’s indictment, Soros’s business announced plans to invest $1 billion in Ukraine.
Since then, significant problems have arisen with the DOJ’s case, thwarting efforts to extradite Firtash to the U.S. for trial.
And finally, Solomon notes:
And when Ukraine’s general prosecutor sought to investigate one of the country’s nonprofits partially funded by Soros during 2016, the State Department pressured Ukrainian officials to drop the case.
This last piece by Solomon is likely what Rudy is alluded to in his comments about Soros in the Ukraine. The Obama State Department intervened in the Ukraine and stopped the case against Soros. Based on Rudy’s comments, it is likely he has support for Obama’s State Department actions.
Source: TheGatewayPundit.com


humansarefree--2020-10-24--Italy: Spontaneous Anti-lockdown Protesters After New Covid-19 Restrictions Announced

Protesters defied curfew and attacked police vehicles in Italy ’ s third-largest city of Naples .
The anger was sparked @ @ @ @ @ call for a new lockdown after the spread of Covid-19 hit a new daily record @ @ @ @ @ records of COVID-19 infections are BECAUSE OF THE RECORD TESTING !
!
!
MORE TESTING @ @ @ @ @ the case fatality remains largely THE SAME ] .
Chanting “ Freedom !
” the @ @ @ @ @ city streets on Friday night , with some hurling bottles , smoke bombs and other @ @ @ @ @ Sweden : No Hard Lockdowns , Masks , Or Social Distancing One of the Lowest @ @ @ @ @ Others attempted to erect barricades using garbage containers and set some of them on fire @ @ @ @ @ as they tried to disperse the rioters .
Videos posted on social media show groups @ @ @ @ @ , forcing the officers to leave the scene .

Protesters defied curfew and attacked police vehicles in Italy’s third-largest city of Naples. The anger was sparked by the governor’s call for a new lockdown after the spread of Covid-19 hit a new daily record.
[The alleged new records of COVID-19 infections are BECAUSE OF THE RECORD TESTING!!! MORE TESTING = MORE CASES, but the case fatality remains largely THE SAME].
Chanting “Freedom!” the angry crowds marched through the city streets on Friday night, with some hurling bottles, smoke bombs and other projectiles at the officers.
Sweden: No Hard Lockdowns, Masks, Or Social Distancing One of the Lowest COVID-19 Fatality Rates in Europe
Others attempted to erect barricades using garbage containers and set some of them on fire. Police deployed tear gas as they tried to disperse the rioters.
Videos posted on social media show groups of people attacking police vehicles, forcing the officers to leave the scene.
Big anti-regional government #COVID19 restrictions protests are happening right now in #Naples , #Italy. The situation seems to be out of control, thousands of people in the streets fighting with police, also stormed the regional government offices. #Napoli #protest #coronavirus pic.twitter.com/q7bY12QB5c — Jakub Wondreys (@JakubWondreys) October 23, 2020
Source: RT.com (excerpts)


humansarefree--2020-10-24--People Prevented from Buying ‘Non-Essential’ Items Due to Lockdown

People living under new lockdown rules in Wales have been prevented from buying so-called “ non-essential ” items , which are being covered with plastic sheeting at supermarkets .
“ Non-essential items being covered up in supermarkets in Wales .
Has it really come to this ?
” asked journalist Grant Tucker .
The image shows shop workers covering up what appear to be duvets and other bedding products .
Why people should be prevented from buying bedding products during a coronavirus lockdown is anyone ’ s guess , but it ’ s par for the course given how much @ @ @ @ @ @ @ petty restrictions .
It seems that “ just two weeks to flatten the curve ” has turned into a perpetual state of abuse .
As we previously highlighted , during the first lockdown back in April , a police force in the UK threatened to start searching people ’ s shopping baskets in order to catch coronavirus lockdown violators .
Northamptonshire Police chief constable Nick Adderley prompted outrage after he appeared in a video to warn people who were buying unessential items at grocery stores that their purchases may be scrutinized by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this stage be starting to marshal supermarkets and checking the items in baskets and trolleys to see whether it ’ s a legitimate , necessary item but again be under no illusion , if people do not heed the warnings and the pleas that I ’ m making today , we will start to do that , ” said Adderley .
In the same month , one shopper was fined by police for buying wine and potato chips , which were deemed to be “ non-essential ” items .
Residents of Wales are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lockdown , which means people are being urged to stay at home , must not visit other households , while pubs , restaurants , gyms , churches and shops deemed “ non-essential ” are all closed .

People living under new lockdown rules in Wales have been prevented from buying so-called “non-essential” items, which are being covered with plastic sheeting at supermarkets.
“Non-essential items being covered up in supermarkets in Wales. Has it really come to this?” asked journalist Grant Tucker.
The image shows shop workers covering up what appear to be duvets and other bedding products.
Why people should be prevented from buying bedding products during a coronavirus lockdown is anyone’s guess, but it’s par for the course given how much society has been deformed thanks to such petty restrictions.
It seems that “just two weeks to flatten the curve” has turned into a perpetual state of abuse.
Non-essential items being covered up in supermarkets in Wales. Has it really come to this? pic.twitter.com/YwtIUjgc8P — Grant Tucker (@GrantTucker) October 23, 2020
As we previously highlighted, during the first lockdown back in April, a police force in the UK threatened to start searching people’s shopping baskets in order to catch coronavirus lockdown violators.
Northamptonshire Police chief constable Nick Adderley prompted outrage after he appeared in a video to warn people who were buying unessential items at grocery stores that their purchases may be scrutinized by the authorities.
“We will not at this stage be starting to marshal supermarkets and checking the items in baskets and trolleys to see whether it’s a legitimate, necessary item but again be under no illusion, if people do not heed the warnings and the pleas that I’m making today, we will start to do that,” said Adderley.
In the same month, one shopper was fined by police for buying wine and potato chips, which were deemed to be “non-essential” items.
Residents of Wales are currently under a ‘Tier 3’ lockdown, which means people are being urged to stay at home, must not visit other households, while pubs, restaurants, gyms, churches and shops deemed “non-essential” are all closed.
Source: Summit.news