humansarefree--2020-12-15--Tens of Thousands of Patriots Flock to DC to March for Election Integrity

A massive swarm of American patriots gathered at the U.S. Capitol and the Supreme Court on Saturday to demand transparency and integrity for the 2020 presidential election .
According to the Epoch Times , supporters of President Donald Trump flocked from all over the nation for the event , including a number of high-profile conservative speakers .
The rally followed the decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to Texas ’ challenge to the 2020 election results in four other battleground states .
In the Friday ruling , SCOTUS justices declared that Texas had no legal standing under the Constitution to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ states .
Speakers at the rally , such as former national security adviser Michael Flynn , disagreed .
“ Courts do not decide who the next president of the United States will be , ” said Flynn outside the Supreme Court building .
“ There are paths that are still in play .
Flynn went on , declaring that “ we are in a crucible moment in the history of the United States of America.
” “ We ’ re only asking to just show us a little transparency , ” Flynn continued @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not look at the signatures ?
Why not look inside these [ voting ] machines ?
Why not ?
What are they afraid of ?
” President Trump himself even flew over Freedom Plaza in Marine One around noon while he was en route to West Point in New York to attend the annual Army-Navy football game .
“ Wow !
Thousands of people forming in Washington ( D.C. ) for Stop the Steal .
Didn ’ t know about this , but I ’ ll be seeing them !
” the president @ @ @ @ @ @ @ morning .
Speakers declared at the rally that it is far more than a mere election that is at stake .
“ If we don ’ t stop the theft of this election , then we will never ever have a free and transparent election again in America , ” Sebastian Gorka , who served as deputy assistant and strategist to Trump in 2017 , told The Epoch Times .
“ There is a rot at the core of American institutions and it ’ s up to us to make a difference.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , told the outlet he believes the state legislatures hold the key to ensuring the integrity of the election .
“ The constitution is clear : It ’ s not CNN , it ’ s not governors , it ’ s not the Supreme Court .
It is the statehouses in America , ” he stated .
Doug Mastriano , a Republican state senator in Pennsylvania , told the Times that his office has been contacted by thousands of people across the state about various election irregularities , such as being denied entry @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they had mailed in a ballot when they hadn ’ t .
Mastriano , who hosted the first public hearing regarding election integrity , called on the Republican party to be more courageous in the political fight ahead .
“ We ’ re on the side of righteousness , and we need to fight forward politically , and not just roll over , ” he proclaimed .
“ We ’ re seeing courage rising , ” Mastriano declared .
“ And it ’ s not too late .
It ’ s never too @ @ @

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced plans to drastically alter the way dietary supplements are regulated, and your help is needed to protect the industry from this attempted government takeover.
by Ethan Huff
When the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA) was passed back in 1994, it came with a new dietary ingredient (NDI) provision requiring the FDA to be notified at least 75 days in advance of a new NDI-containing product coming to market.
For years, the FDA did not enforce this NDI provision, and in fact has never in the 26 years since DSHEA became law finalized any standards for how the process should work.
The FDA is finally now coming out with a plan, but the Alliance for Natural Health USA (ANH-USA) says the way it is worded threatens the viability of the entire supplement industry.
While the intended purpose of the NDI provision is to ensure that no unsafe ingredients of an unknown nature end up in dietary supplements, the FDA is apparently twisting it to create a drug-like pre-approval system for supplements that experts say will result in the elimination of tens of thousands of supplement products from the market.
What was designed to be a simple notification system has the potential to become an egregious regulatory roadblock for dietary supplement companies – the very thing DSHEA was created to help prevent.
“Part of the issue is that the FDA is adopting a broad definition of an NDI and thus expanding the number of supplements that will be subject to NDI notification procedures,” ANH-USA warns.
“For example, supplements that have not been ‘chemically altered’ are not required to comply with these procedures; but the FDA is adopting an expansive definition of what it means to be ‘chemically altered’ such that almost all modern supplements would probably qualify and thus be subject to NDI requirements.”
Sign the Action Alert telling the FDA to leave supplements alone!
According to ANH-USA, none of this is an accident. The FDA, because it exists as a revolving door with the pharmaceutical industry, has long tried to destroy dietary supplements because they threaten the viability of Big Pharma – and this latest attempted move is no exception.
With the FDA seemingly trying to slip in another Trojan Horse under the guise of protecting Americans against adulterated supplements, it is up to us to make our voices heard.
“It’s the same old story,” ANH-USA warns. “The agency, under the guise of protecting us, is really just protecting its funder, the drug industry, and is throttling any chance of innovation and improvement in supplements.”
“This is so corrupt that it is hard to understand how Congress can continue to turn a blind eye to it, but of course Big Pharma funds political campaigns as well.”
ANH-USA has put together an Action Alert that we are encouraging our readers to sign. It links to a comment page set up by the FDA itself to hear what you have to say about this proposed new guidance.
Our suggestion is to tell the FDA that while it is important to ensure that new dietary ingredients are safe, this should not be used as an excuse to make it prohibitively difficult, if not impossible, for new supplements to come to market.
It should also not be used as an excuse to pull from the market many of the dietary supplements that Americans have come to rely on for their personal health. Some of these may have been the ones Donald and Melania Trump used to treat their Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) diagnoses.


humansarefree--2020-12-14--Debunking the Myth of Overpopulation

Debunking the Myth of Overpopulation

In his latest , “ Mouse Utopia and the Blackest Pill ” , James Corbett takes aim at perhaps the most insidious propaganda narrative of all , and one that is very close to my heart : Overpopulation .
This has been a personal bugbear of mine since I grew old enough to detect subtext , but long before I could articulate exactly why : The pervasive and destructive idea that there are too many people .
A propaganda construct that seeks to create contempt for masses of ordinary people , whilst excusing hubristic and inhumane practices by institutions and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ come to the fore during this “ pandemic ” , made obvious by the fevered gleeful enthusiasm with which so many took up the narrative .
One UN representative claimed the coronavirus was Earth “ sending us a message ” .
Back in April , the South China Morning Post ran an article headlined : Why Covid-19 is a human overpopulation problem – perhaps humans are the virus ?
We ’ ve been told for nearly two centuries that the planet is overpopulated , it has never been true .
The idea there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will be ) has been around since the world ’ s population was less than 1/10th of what it is now .
The crisis – Paul Ehrlich ’ s infamous “ Population Bomb ” – is yet to materialise , but since when did failed predictions deter apocalyptic doomsaying ?
It ’ s not hard to see the appeal of the idea .
On an institutional level , overpopulation is a grand excuse .
When Thomas Malthus predicted the overpopulation crisis in the early 19th century , and claimed that mass want was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a “ get out of jail free ” card .
As inequality spikes and living standards diminish anyone who campaigns for change , or protests outside the seats of power , can be told “ it ’ s not our fault there is suffering !
It ’ s not our fault there is poverty !
It ’ s your fault , you ’ re reproducing too fast !
There are simply too many people !
” .
In that sense , it is a lie which protects the ruling class from the anger @ @ @ @ @ @ @ serves another purpose too .
On a personal level , “ enlightened ” members of the elite have always been keen to write-off huge swaths of the population as surplus to requirements .
The idea of overpopulation allows academics , royals and bankers – men and women who hold themselves above the common folk based on their brains , blood and gold – to preach mass-murder whilst hiding their misanthropic god-complexes behind concern for the “ common man ” , our “ future children ” , or “ the environment ” .
From @ @ @ @ @ @ @ eaters ” and all those evil ideas spread by technocrats and billionaires , who would never in a thousand years considers themselves part of this supposed surplus .
People who convince the world they are “ good ” by camouflaging their insidious means behind supposedly beneficent ends .
Also read : Bill Gates Is The Biggest Depopulationist Alive It ’ s possible – and easy – to refute these ideas intellectually .
The complete output of all the farmland we currently use is enough to feed every person on this planet , plus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vast , vast amounts of untapped resources available to us – including people themselves .
Each new person born could be the genius who invents a way to increase crop yields or better harness geothermal energy or some other amazing step forward in societal evolution .
Even supposing we were nearing any kind of purely hypothetical population ceiling , there would be no need to do anything about it .
Nature is self-limiting .
We ’ re taught that at 12 years old , with diagrams and big green arrows .
When there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lots of foxes .
The foxes eat the rabbits , the rabbits decrease .
Fewer rabbits feed fewer foxes .
Fewer foxes means the rabbits grow more numerous .
And so the cycle repeats .
This cycle has maintained life on this planet for millions of years before humans , and will do so for millions of years afterward .
To seek to corral or control nature has been historically shown to be both impossible and unnecessary .
So yes , it ’ s important to oppose the pervasive myth on a purely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ equally important – perhaps more important – to oppose it on philosophical , even spiritual level .
To hold fast against the idea that human life , any life , can be reduced to a matter of cold arithmetic .
That bankers or royals or scientists have any kind of right to decide exactly which people are necessary , and which are simply taking up space .
Simply put : we need to outright , in full voice , reject the idea that some people don ’ t matter .
Or that people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which needs to be cured .
James Corbett puts it well near the end of the above video : “ You are not a cancer on this planet , you are not a useless eater .
We do not need drastic strictures of control over the human population , both literal and metaphorical , in order to make the world better… ” But the best-expressed rejection of the Malthusian belief system is from a very appropriate source , given the time of year .
In Dickens ’ A Christmas Carol , Ebenezer Scrooge @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like to die they had “ better do it , and decrease the surplus population.
” To which The Ghost of Christmas Present offers this stinging rebuke : “ Man , if man you be in heart , not adamant , forbear that wicked cant until you have discovered What the surplus is , and Where it is .
Will you decide what men shall live , what men shall die ?
It may be , that in the sight of Heaven , you are more worthless and less fit to live than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ child.
” And that , I think , is a fine place to leave you .

In his latest, “Mouse Utopia and the Blackest Pill”, James Corbett takes aim at perhaps the most insidious propaganda narrative of all, and one that is very close to my heart: Overpopulation.
This has been a personal bugbear of mine since I grew old enough to detect subtext, but long before I could articulate exactly why: The pervasive and destructive idea that there are too many people.
A propaganda construct that seeks to create contempt for masses of ordinary people, whilst excusing hubristic and inhumane practices by institutions and elites.
These destructive belief systems have come to the fore during this “pandemic”, made obvious by the fevered gleeful enthusiasm with which so many took up the narrative. One UN representative claimed the coronavirus was Earth “sending us a message”.
Back in April, the South China Morning Post ran an article headlined: Why Covid-19 is a human overpopulation problem – perhaps humans are the virus?
We’ve been told for nearly two centuries that the planet is overpopulated, it has never been true. The idea there are too many people (or soon will be) has been around since the world’s population was less than 1/10th of what it is now.
The crisis – Paul Ehrlich’s infamous “Population Bomb” – is yet to materialise, but since when did failed predictions deter apocalyptic doomsaying?
It’s not hard to see the appeal of the idea.
On an institutional level, overpopulation is a grand excuse. When Thomas Malthus predicted the overpopulation crisis in the early 19th century, and claimed that mass want was inevitable, he handed the ruling class a “get out of jail free” card.
As inequality spikes and living standards diminish anyone who campaigns for change, or protests outside the seats of power, can be told “it’s not our fault there is suffering! It’s not our fault there is poverty! It’s your fault, you’re reproducing too fast! There are simply too many people!”.
In that sense, it is a lie which protects the ruling class from the anger of those they control. But it serves another purpose too.
On a personal level, “enlightened” members of the elite have always been keen to write-off huge swaths of the population as surplus to requirements.
The idea of overpopulation allows academics, royals and bankers – men and women who hold themselves above the common folk based on their brains, blood and gold – to preach mass-murder whilst hiding their misanthropic god-complexes behind concern for the “common man”, our “future children”, or “the environment”.
From this wellspring flows eugenics and “useless eaters” and all those evil ideas spread by technocrats and billionaires, who would never in a thousand years considers themselves part of this supposed surplus.
People who convince the world they are “good” by camouflaging their insidious means behind supposedly beneficent ends.
Also read: Billy Boy Is The Biggest Depopulationist Alive
It’s possible – and easy – to refute these ideas intellectually.
The complete output of all the farmland we currently use is enough to feed every person on this planet, plus another 3 billion people. There are vast, vast amounts of untapped resources available to us – including people themselves.
Each new person born could be the genius who invents a way to increase crop yields or better harness geothermal energy or some other amazing step forward in societal evolution.
Even supposing we were nearing any kind of purely hypothetical population ceiling, there would be no need to do anything about it. Nature is self-limiting. We’re taught that at 12 years old, with diagrams and big green arrows.
When there are lots of rabbits, you get lots of foxes. The foxes eat the rabbits, the rabbits decrease. Fewer rabbits feed fewer foxes. Fewer foxes means the rabbits grow more numerous. And so the cycle repeats.
This cycle has maintained life on this planet for millions of years before humans, and will do so for millions of years afterward. To seek to corral or control nature has been historically shown to be both impossible and unnecessary.
So yes, it’s important to oppose the pervasive myth on a purely intellectual level.
But it’s equally important – perhaps more important – to oppose it on philosophical, even spiritual level. To hold fast against the idea that human life, any life, can be reduced to a matter of cold arithmetic.
That bankers or royals or scientists have any kind of right to decide exactly which people are necessary, and which are simply taking up space.
Simply put: we need to outright, in full voice, reject the idea that some people don’t matter. Or that people as a whole are an unnatural plague which needs to be cured.
James Corbett puts it well near the end of the above video:
“You are not a cancer on this planet, you are not a useless eater. We do not need drastic strictures of control over the human population, both literal and metaphorical, in order to make the world better…”
But the best-expressed rejection of the Malthusian belief system is from a very appropriate source, given the time of year.
In Dickens’ A Christmas Carol, Ebenezer Scrooge famously says that if the poor are like to die they had “better do it, and decrease the surplus population.” To which The Ghost of Christmas Present offers this stinging rebuke:
“Man, if man you be in heart, not adamant, forbear that wicked cant until you have discovered What the surplus is, and Where it is. Will you decide what men shall live, what men shall die? It may be, that in the sight of Heaven, you are more worthless and less fit to live than millions like this poor man’s child.”
And that, I think, is a fine place to leave you.
By Kit Knightly, Guest writer


humansarefree--2020-12-14--Coca Cola Tests Positive for COVID-19 in Austrian Parliament

An Austrian parliamentary member exposed the defectiveness of the government ’ s COVID-19 tests by demonstrating in the parliament how a glass of Coca Cola tested positive for COVID-19 .
In footage from the meeting in Vienna Friday , FPO General Secretary Michael Schnedlitz brings a glass of Coca Cola to the podium , from which he proceeds to collect drops to use on an antigen rapid test being used on a mass scale .
After going to the lectern and starting his speech , the politician sprinkled few drops of cola on corona rapid test .
Three minutes later @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Cola was COVID-19 positive .
After demonstrating a positive result , Schnedlitz goes on to slam the tests as a waste of taxpayer resources .
“ Mr .
President , we are likely to have a problem now , we have a positive corona test in parliament , namely this cola triggered a positive corona test .
I don ’ t know how to deal with it now !
With things like this you are throwing tens of millions of euros in tax money out of the window instead of providing real protection @ @ @ @ @ @ @ homes , instead of investing money in our hospitals .
The corona mass tests are worthless !
This was also shown by a simple experiment in parliament , in which a cola had a positive result !
But this black-green government spends tens of millions in tax money on precisely these tests.
” Earlier , the Tanzanian President John Magufuli growing suspicious of the World Health Organization ( WHO ) , decided to investigate the claims of the tests himself .
He sent the WHO samples of a goat , a papaya and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which came COVID-19 positive .
Because of such massive COVID-19 false positive cases scandal , the Australian Government has scrapped a billion dollar coronavirus vaccine agreement with Australian biotech company CSL Limited to supply 51 million doses of a Covid-19 vaccine being developed by the University of Queensland after several trial participants returned false positive HIV test results .
It should be noted that the Portuguese appeals court has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test .

An Austrian parliamentary member exposed the defectiveness of the government’s COVID-19 tests by demonstrating in the parliament how a glass of Coca Cola tested positive for COVID-19.
In footage from the meeting in Vienna Friday, FPO General Secretary Michael Schnedlitz brings a glass of Coca Cola to the podium, from which he proceeds to collect drops to use on an antigen rapid test being used on a mass scale.
After going to the lectern and starting his speech, the politician sprinkled few drops of cola on corona rapid test. Three minutes later the test showed a result: Coca Cola was COVID-19 positive.
After demonstrating a positive result, Schnedlitz goes on to slam the tests as a waste of taxpayer resources.
“Mr. President, we are likely to have a problem now, we have a positive corona test in parliament, namely this cola triggered a positive corona test. I don’t know how to deal with it now!
With things like this you are throwing tens of millions of euros in tax money out of the window instead of providing real protection for old people’s and nursing homes, instead of investing money in our hospitals.
The corona mass tests are worthless! This was also shown by a simple experiment in parliament, in which a cola had a positive result! But this black-green government spends tens of millions in tax money on precisely these tests.”
An Austrian parliamentary member exposed the defectiveness of the government’s #COVID19 tests by demonstrating in the parliament how a glass of #CocaCola tested positive for COVID-19 https://t.co/5uMD08S2Oo pic.twitter.com/rGzsHTuSEt — GreatGameIndia (@GreatGameIndia) December 12, 2020
Earlier, the Tanzanian President John Magufuli growing suspicious of the World Health Organization (WHO), decided to investigate the claims of the tests himself. He sent the WHO samples of a goat, a papaya and a quail for testing, all of which came COVID-19 positive.
Because of such massive COVID-19 false positive cases scandal, the Australian Government has scrapped a billion dollar coronavirus jjab agreement with Australian biotech company CSL Limited to supply 51 million doses of a Covid-19 jjab being developed by the University of Queensland after several trial participants returned false positive HIV test results.
It should be noted that the Portuguese appeals court has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test.
Source: GreatGameIndia.com


humansarefree--2020-12-15--Obama Jokes About Not Being Born in the USA: ‘I Was Able to Get Away With It’ — Proof He Was Born in

Obama Jokes About Not Being Born in the USA: ‘I Was Able to Get Away With It’ — Proof He Was Born in Kenya

Back in 2007 Hillary Clinton and her campaign circulated a memo promoting Barack Obama ’ s “ lack of American roots ” and reportedly began the “ birther controversy.
” “ [ Barack Obama ’ s ] roots to American values and culture are at best limited , ” the memo says .
“ I can not imagine America electing a president during a time of war who is not at his center fundamentally American in his thinking and values.
” Americans became suspicious after then-candidate Obama , who claimed he was born in Hawaii , refused to release his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the US and therefore eligible to be US President .
Hillary Clinton used the birther issue to attack Donald Trump during the 2016 campaign but it backfired on her .
President Trump did question Barack Obama ’ s birth certificate and his past living as Barry Soetoro , the name Obama used while he lived in Indonesia as a child .
“ When I was 18 , people called me Donald Trump .
When he was 18 , Barack Obama was Barry Soweto ( sic ) .
Weird.
” Trump tweeted in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and said he was “ able to get away with ” not being born in the US : Proof that Barack Hussein Obama was born in Kenya And since Mr. Obama decided to open this can of worms once again , I feel it is my duty to remind you that his birth certificate was proven to be a forgery , his lawyers admitted to it in court , and that there are copious amounts of evidence from various sources attesting that he was born in Kenya : • Obama ’ s Birth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Forensic Outcome : Certificate Is Fake ( Source : USA Today ) Also watch this press release here .
• Obama ’ s Lawyers Admitted in Court : Birth Certificate is Forged , ‘ But Eligibility is a Separate Matter ’ • Barack ’ s brother , Malik Obama , provided proof in the form of his real birth certificate , that Barack Hussein Obama was born in Kenya : • British Intelligence Advisor Barrister Michael Shrimpton presented a report in which he indicated that Barack Hussein Obama was born in Kenya .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Obama ’ s Literary Agent in 1991 Booklet : ‘ Born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii ’ : • April 3rd 2007 listing from Mr Obama ’ s literary agents Acton & Dystel touts the then-Democratic junior senator from Illinois as ‘ born in Kenya ’ : • Dreams of my father : The 1991 pamphlet says Barack Obama was born in Kenya and raised in Hawaii and Indonesia • On March 7th , 2012 , the Russian publication “ Pravda ” called out the U.S. press for its deliberate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ American history .

Back in 2007 Hillary Clinton and her campaign circulated a memo promoting Barack Obama’s “lack of American roots” and reportedly began the “birther controversy.”
“[Barack Obama’s] roots to American values and culture are at best limited,” the memo says. “I cannot imagine America electing a president during a time of war who is not at his center fundamentally American in his thinking and values.”
Americans became suspicious after then-candidate Obama, who claimed he was born in Hawaii, refused to release his birth certificate to prove he was born in the US and therefore eligible to be US President.
Hillary Clinton used the birther issue to attack Donald Trump during the 2016 campaign but it backfired on her.
President Trump did question Barack Obama’s birth certificate and his past living as Barry Soetoro, the name Obama used while he lived in Indonesia as a child.
“When I was 18, people called me Donald Trump. When he was 18, Barack Obama was Barry Soweto (sic). Weird.” Trump tweeted in 2012.
When I was 18, people called me Donald Trump. When he was 18, @BarackObama was Barry Soweto. Weird. — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 12, 2012
Barack Obama trolled President Trump and said he was “able to get away with” not being born in the US:
via TheGatewayPundit.com
Proof that Barack Hussein Obama was born in Kenya
And since Mr. Obama decided to open this can of worms once again, I feel it is my duty to remind you that his birth certificate was proven to be a forgery, his lawyers admitted to it in court, and that there are copious amounts of evidence from various sources attesting that he was born in Kenya:


humansarefree--2020-12-15--Coronavirus Fact-Check #9: Is the Vaccine Safe?

Reports of allergic reactions , bells palsy and conflicting opinions of many experts make the question difficult to answer .
There are dozens of articles all over the mainstream reassuring us that the brand new Sars-Cov-2 vaccine is safe .
In the UK the vaccine rolled out is being hailed as “ V Day ” , in a shameless attempt to draw a parallel with World War II .
Matt Hancock went on Good Morning Britain and attempted to “ cry ” .
On the other side of that coin , many experts in the field have vociferously called for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ halt , some medical researchers are questioning the data and others counsel people to refuse the vaccine under any and all circumstances .
So – is the vaccine safe ?
The only rational answer is “ we don ’ t know ” .
It ’ s certainly true some people who have received it have experienced unexpected side effects .
It was recently revealed that 4 people involved in the US-based trial suffered partial facial paralysis .
In the UK , two NHS staff who have received the vaccine suffered allergic anaphylactoid reactions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now not recommending the vaccine for anyone who “ suffers from allergies ” .
They don ’ t know what caused the reaction , and as far as we know so far , the people involved were not allergic to anything in the vaccine .
It seems it ’ s not about being allergic to the vaccine , so much as the vaccine potentially causing problems for anyone with a sensitive or dysfunctional immune system .
It ’ s essentially recommended that no one who is allergic to anything , i.e .
other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ jab .
We ’ ve already had “ explainers ” appearing the media , saying vaccine allergic reactions are “ rare and shortlived ” .
To be clear , as of December 10th , the vaccine either has never been tested on , or is not recommended for : • Pregnant women ( or women intending to become pregnant in the near future ) .
So the official line already cedes that the vaccine may be harmful to some or all of those people .
Even on the fully-grown and totally healthy adults @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there has not been enough time to do any kind of long term studies on possible side-effects or complications It usually takes 5-10 years to fully develop and test a vaccine , where as this has been rushed out in less than 10 months .
On top of that , of course , we have the fact all the vaccine producers have campaigned for – and won – total legal immunity in the UK , US and other nations around the world .
In the event the vaccine does cause harm , Pfizer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) , are immune from civil liability .
Which means that , just like us , the producers themselves are well-aware the new vaccines might not be safe , and don ’ t want a repeat of 2009 , when a rushed-out flu vaccine resulted in children suffering life-long complications and receiving millions in damages .
In the final analysis , you have to ask yourself a simple question : Do you feel safer taking an untested vaccine , or risking getting a virus with a survival rate of over 99 % ?

Almost four years of mainstream media hype about “fake news” and “Russian meddling” propaganda has brought to the world exactly what they were intended to bring: an effective mechanism for internet and social media censorship.
In the center of this move toward global discourse control is an organization called the Poynter Institute, home to the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), a body created to coordinate, promote and train dozens of fact-checkers from around the world.
The IFCN and many non-profits working in the same field are funded by the big capitalist “philanthropists” of our era, like George Soros, Pierre Omidyar, Billy Boy, and even the Koch brothers… but also by the US Department of State and a shady “aid” – in reality, political meddling – organization, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), historically linked to the CIA and regime change operations.
Google and Facebook – itself tied to the warmongering Atlantic Council and its “Digital Forensic Research Lab” – are also associated with Poynter, by funding and partnershipsto fight “fake news” (including the development of an “automated” fact-checking program for the upcoming 2020).
The marriage between Poynter’s IFCN, politically inclined billionaires, the State Department – and the whitewashed public face of the Deep State – suggest that the institute is probably working in what Nelson Poynter, its founder, worked on for a key part of his life: propaganda and censorship for the US government.
Although this information is not available in Nelson Poynter’s Wikipedia profile or in poynter.org’s history page, his work for a government propaganda agency is not exactly a secret.
A resemblance of his wife, Henrietta, also at the institute’s website, quickly passes over the fact that Poynter did work for the Office of War Information (OWI) during WWII, but his specific role as a government censor and propagandist is never mentioned.
Nevertheless, Hollywood Goes to War, a book written in 1987 by Clayton R. Koppes and Gregory D. Black, is one of the many historical sources that tell the details of Poynter’s job.
Film censorship and the birth of the Voice of America
Nelson Poynter was recruited by the OWI with his wife Henrietta, who worked as assistant program chief under Elmer Davis, head of the agency. She came up with the name for the “Voice of America”, the famous psychological war operation of the US government.
The radio project was established in February 1942 and soon grew to be the most important US overt propaganda arm of the Cold War.
Unlike his wife’s job, Poynter’s regarded not radio – or his previous line of work, journalism – but movies. In 1942, the OWI’s Bureau of Motion Pictures (BMP) set up office in Hollywood, naming Poynter as its head. His mission was to act as liaison between the agency and the owners of Warner Brothers, Twentieth Century Fox, MGM and the other big studio names.
Elmer Davis, head of the OWI, regarded films as:
“The easiest way to inject a propaganda idea into most people’s minds,” in part, because they “do not realize that they are being propagandized.”
Davis was a career journalist who worked for ten years for the New York Times before being recruited by the government. Franklin D. Roosevelt’s White House needed the film industry to incorporate specific themes in their movies, ideas that promoted the notion of WWII as being a “popular” war, fought to defend his Four Freedoms.
But at first, Poynter’s office in Hollywood had little veto power over what the industry could produce – for the entire Western world – limiting itself to suggest cosmetic changes here and there, or the toning down of reactionary and racist imagery and language, an inherent feature in the Hollywood of that era.
The heads of the studios were in fairly good terms with the US Army, historically close to the industry. Its owners were happy to portrait US wars abroad as heroic, in exchange for the lending of military equipment, installations and expert advice.
But in most cases, a disappointed Poynter complained, war ended up only as “a backdrop” for shallow romance, cheap comedies and other proven formulas.
Poynter and his boss at the BMP, Lowell Mellett, also hired a former assistant of Harold Lasswell, a famous social researcher who said – back in the 30s – that democracy needed propaganda because people were not the best judges of their own interest.
Eventually, the team devised a way to exert more power over the unruly, reactionary and overly commercial Hollywood studios. They decided to ask the US Office of Censorshipto weight in and threat them with banning “offending” films from export, seriously reducing their potential earnings.
According to Koppes and Black’s Hollywood Goes to War, it was a success, prompting MGM, Warner and the other big names to start turning their scripts for review to the Poynter. The BMP knew it was important to intervene right at that stage, before big amounts of money were spent in production.
Poynter was a diligent censor and propagandist, going as far as to suggest dialogues for the movie scripts he was reviewing, breaching “one of the industries taboos” and provoking the powerful tycoons, according to the authors mentioned above.
When the war ended, Poynter went back to journalism. He eventually took over the St. Petersburg Times (renamed Tampa Bay Times in 2012), owned by his father. He also founded the Congressional Quarterly with his wife Henrietta, who died in 1968.
As we can read in the Poynter institute’s website:
“When Henrietta died suddenly at the age of 66, Nelson mourned deeply. ‘Her passing marked the end of an era for Mr. Poynter,’ said David Shedden, former research librarian at The Poynter Institute. ‘He started looking to the future and thinking about his legacy. He focused on creating a school for journalists, which of course became the Modern Media Institute, and then the Poynter Institute’.”
Nevertheless, historian W.C. Bourne explains that many of the OWI’s top brass – as Elmer Davis and Nelson Poynter, former journalists – returned to the corporate media after the war, but “retained an abiding belief in the things for which OWI stood and the possibilities of accomplishment in the international information picture”.
Many of them also retained the Deep State contacts and a nationalistic “spirit of collaboration”.
A legacy of censorship
Nelson Poynter’s work for the government ended many decades ago, and it would be reasonable to suggest that his ties to the US government and its propaganda apparatusprobably never involved the journalism institution he founded years after leaving the OWI.
But we have evidence pointing precisely in the opposite direction.
Firstly, the obvious – and open – ties between the institute and today’s version of the foreign meddling machine installed by the US during the Cold War (i.e. the NED). As informed on many occasions by independent journalists, one of the founders of the National Endowment for Democracy once admitted that:
“A lot of what we do today was done covertly twenty-five years ago by the CIA.”
Secondly, the intimate ties between the Poynter Institute and the US State Department, which selected it to conduct the “Edward Murrow Program for Journalists”. It brings together “more than 100 emerging international journalists from around the world to examine journalistic practices in the United States”.
In other words, to be indoctrinated in Western corporate journalism and culture and start a relationship with a potential foreign opinion leader.
The State Department’s Murrow program is part of Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA), an agency dedicated to “cultural diplomacy”, intimately tied to intelligence and foreign policy since way before the Cold War. The participants to be trained by Poynter are chosen by US embassies abroad.
A 2017 report of the historical success of the educational exchange agency stated that:
“…565 alumni of the ECA programs are current heads or former heads of state and government, and 31 alumni are heads of international organizations.”
Thirdly, the Poynter Institute, too, redacted an infamous blacklist of “fake news” sites, with the intention of marginalize and, in this case, deny many of them of any kind of advertisement money.
A blacklist to defund them all
For this operation, launched on April 30, 2019, Poynter ganged-up with the rest of the fact-checking “cartel”, so to speak.
The institute gathered the blacklists and analysis done in recent years by Snopes, Fact-check.org, Politifact (owned by the Tampa Bay Times and Poynter), OpenSources and the Fake News Codex, and used them to create the mother of all blacklists, naming 515 “unreliable” news websites.
It was retracted shortly after its publication, on May 2, after coming under criticism for “unreliability and poor methodology”. The irony! And this should be understood as an indictment on the whole bunch.
As one critic from the George Washington University noted:
“Beneath the veneer of its precision, the fact-checking enterprise relies heavily on opinion and interpretation…If a list summarizing fact-checking results and verified by fact checkers is ultimately retracted by those same fact checkers for not being rigorous, it underscores the question of why we should trust anything from the fact-checking community.”
To add insult to injury, Poynter’s dubious list of “unreliable websites” was intended to cause financial harm to those named in it, by guiding advertisers and ad-technology applications to deny them of ads.
After the retraction, Stephen Gutowski, a writer from one of the affected websites, Free Beacon, wrote:
“What a disgusting exercise in bad faith from an organization that’s supposed to be about improving and promoting journalism. Instead, they’re creating tabloid-level listicles to smear reporters without offering even a single piece of evidence. Shame on you, @Poynter.”
Philip Klein, from The Washington Examiner – also listed – thought it was:
“…worrisome to call for advertisers blacklisting news organizations, especially given the opacity of the process and arbitrariness of many of the judgements [sic].”
The “cartel”
Most of the non-profits behind Poynter’s blacklist share patrons, except for the controversial Snopes, that runs on less grant money than advertisement revenues.
The International Fact-checking Network and its more than a hundred “associated” – subordinated – smaller fact checkers around the globe, are also funded by the same “philanthropists”, like Billy Boy, whose foundation already finances tens of mainstream corporate news outlets with tens of millions of dollars, just like the Columbia Journalism Review recently uncovered.
Regarding Poynter and Gates, specifically:
“…Poynter senior vice president Kelly McBride said Gates’s money was passed on to media fact-checking sites, including Africa Check, and noted that she is “absolutely confident” that no bias or blind spots emerged from the work, though she acknowledged that she has not reviewed it herself.”
In a blatant conflict of interests, those same fact-checkers often (try to) debunk information related to the Gates Foundation, just like a private PR agency.
Many lesser players in the global constellation of fact checkers are also funded directly by George Soros and his Open Society Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the US embassy and/or the NED.
When “fact-checking”, the members of this private-public consortium often limit themselves to copy/paste from their “parent” sources, like Poynter’s Politifact and Snopes.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Sues Facebook And So-Called ‘Fact-Checkers’ For Government-Sponsored Censorship
As Emil Marmol and Lee Mager recently wrote for Project Censored, the “fake news” psychological operation was little more than a “Trojan horse for silencing alternative news and reestablishing corporate news dominance”:
“The fake news hysteria created by those in government and echoed by the corporate news media is being harnessed and used as a pretext for the suppression of dissent and counterhegemonic viewpoints while re-establishing the corporate press’s preeminence as the sole purveyor and manufacturer of public opinion.”
The Covid-19 pandemic has accelerated the degenerative process under the guise of “protecting us”, prompting democratic governments to take dangerous paths, like arresting citizens for promoting street marches on Facebook.
The internet opened up a world of information to the regular citizen, we must keep it open so more of us can take a look.


humansarefree--2020-12-15--Amazon Introduces Orwellian ‘Fitness Bracelet’ with Hidden Microphone

The latest spying and surveillance device from Amazon has been released in the form of a “ Halo Band , ” which is similar to an Apple Watch or a Fitbit but different in that it actively collects personal information to send back to the mother ship .
The tech marvel comes at an introductory price of $ 65 , but will eventually cost $ 100 with a $ 4 monthly subscription fee .
It comes equipped with a microphone for recording people ’ s conversations , though unlike an Apple Watch it has no screen and emits no sounds @ @ @ @ @ @ @ basically a listening device that is being marketed as a “ health and fitness ” tool .
Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos claims it can help people to stay healthy by actively probing their bodies with proprietary scanning technology .
“ The Halo Band asks you to strip down and strap on a microphone so that it can make 3-D scans of your body fat and monitor your tone of voice , ” reads a Washington Post review of the technology .
“ It will tell you if you haven ’ t exercised or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tone of voice ; and all those pictures of your body and all those voice recordings will get analyzed by the tracker ’ s machine learning technology.
” Compared to all other similar devices on the market , the review goes on to explain , Amazon ’ s Halo Band is by far the most invasive .
The irony , however , is that the expansive data it collects is put to almost no legitimate use as far as the end user is concerned .
“ The Halo collects the most intimate information @ @ @ @ @ @ @ health gadget – and makes the absolute least of it , ” the review states .
“ This wearable is much better at helping Amazon gather data than at helping you get healthy and happy.
” In essence , Amazon ’ s Halo Band is a wearable Alexa that can not play music or really do much of anything beyond send your personal information to Jeff Bezos and his spies .

The latest spying and surveillance device from Amazon has been released in the form of a “Halo Band,” which is similar to an Apple Watch or a Fitbit but different in that it actively collects personal information to send back to the mother ship.
by Ethan Huff
The tech marvel comes at an introductory price of $65, but will eventually cost $100 with a $4 monthly subscription fee. It comes equipped with a microphone for recording people’s conversations, though unlike an Apple Watch it has no screen and emits no sounds or vibrations.
The Halo Band is basically a listening device that is being marketed as a “health and fitness” tool. Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos claims it can help people to stay healthy by actively probing their bodies with proprietary scanning technology.
“The Halo Band asks you to strip down and strap on a microphone so that it can make 3-D scans of your body fat and monitor your tone of voice,” reads a Washington Post review of the technology.
“It will tell you if you haven’t exercised or slept enough; it will describe your tone of voice; and all those pictures of your body and all those voice recordings will get analyzed by the tracker’s machine learning technology.”
Compared to all other similar devices on the market, the review goes on to explain, Amazon’s Halo Band is by far the most invasive. The irony, however, is that the expansive data it collects is put to almost no legitimate use as far as the end user is concerned.
“The Halo collects the most intimate information we’ve seen from a consumer health gadget – and makes the absolute least of it,” the review states. “This wearable is much better at helping Amazon gather data than at helping you get healthy and happy.”
In essence, Amazon’s Halo Band is a wearable Alexa that cannot play music or really do much of anything beyond send your personal information to Jeff Bezos and his spies.


humansarefree--2020-12-15--The Covid-19 Data is a ‘Travesty’ — How the UK and US Covid Deaths Are Inflated

Although people have tragically died from Covid-19 , the way the Covid-19 death data is recorded in many countries around the world has produced , and continues to produce , an inflated death toll .
This inflated death toll has then been , and continues to be , used by fascist-style bureaucracies , in conjunction with scientific priesthoods , to terrify the general public into obedience .
One of the most basic laws of statistics is that correlation does not equal causation .
Although this may sound complicated , it ’ s not .
It simply means that just because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , or to put this another way , a close relationship between two things in the world , this does not mean that one thing is causing the other thing to happen .
A third factor may be causing the correlation that is observed for instance .
As an example , there is usually a correlation in many countries between cold weather and people buying more goods in shops , or online , but this increase in buying is not caused by cold weather .
Instead , it is caused by the Christmas @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and it just happens to be the case that the weather is usually cold in December in many parts of the world that celebrate Christmas .
So , even though there is a correlation between cold weather and increased buying patterns , cold weather does not cause increased buying patterns , but the Christmas period causes people to buy more goods .
Furthermore , the correlation that is observed between two things in the world may just be a product of random chance .
This has led people to point to some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that there was a correlation between margarine consumption and divorce rates in the Maine between 2000 and 2009 .
There was also a correlation between per capita cheese consumption and the number of people who died by becoming tangled in their bedsheets , or the number of people who drowned by falling into a pool and films Nicholas Cage appeared in .
Once again , correlation does not equal causation .
If we turn our attention back to the Covid death data , just because someone has tested positive for Covid-19 and died @ @ @ @ @ @ @ aside for a second that some tests are known to give false positives ) , that does not mean that Covid-19 caused that person to die .
Yet , the main figure certain countries around the world are using to express Covid-19 deaths is simply recorded , or coded , as essentially any death involving a positive Covid-19 test within 28 days of death .
Because correlation does not equal causation , simply recording Covid-19 deaths as any deaths involving a positive Covid-19 test within a given period of time is an extremely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have died .
For instance , in the UK , the main figure being used for Covid-19 deaths is coded , as stated on the official Coronavirus website , as the “ number of deaths of people who had had a positive test result for COVID-19 and died within 28 days of the first positive test.
” This completely ignores the problem of causality , and thus , produces a much larger death toll than there actually is .
For instance , if someone has had an underlying heart condition for 10 years @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dies , their death was most likely mainly caused by the heart condition that has plagued them for a decade .
However , if that person had tested positive for Covid-19 for the first time within 28 days of them dying , that person could be included as a Covid-19 death in the UK , if all is required to be categorized as a Covid-19 death is simply a positive test result .
For those who understand that the way you code deaths dramatically changes the number of deaths you get , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
There is a second numberrecorded by UK authorities which codes deaths as “ people whose death certificate mentioned COVID-19 as one of the causes.
” By coding deaths this way , there are thousands more Covid-19 deaths compared to when deaths are coded as “ people who had had a positive test result for COVID-19 and died within 28 days of the first positive test.
” Despite the UK authorities having two ways to code Covid-19 deaths however , none of them are particularly accurate in my opinion .
This is because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the issue of causality , and the death certificate figure only mentions Covid as needing to be “ one of the causes ” of death , rather than “ the primary cause , ” in addition to the death certificate figure not explicitly demanding the need for a positive Covid-19 test result .
If we turn our attention to the United States , we find similar issues with the Covid-19 data .
One of the main figures the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC ) is reporting as the total @ @ @ @ @ @ @ United States – which stands at 241,906 deaths at the time I am recording this audio – is presented as “ all deaths involving Covid-19.
” If we dig a little deeper , this number is based on “ deaths with confirmed or presumed COVID-19 , coded to ICD–10 code U07.1.
” If we continue to dig , we can better understand how this number is calculated .
The CDC ’ s website states that : “ The National Center for Health Statistics ( NCHS ) uses incoming data from death certificates to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ include deaths occurring within the 50 states and the District of Columbia… COVID-19 deaths are identified using a new ICD–10 code .
“ When COVID-19 is reported as a cause of death – or when it is listed as a “ probable ” or “ presumed ” cause — the death is coded as U07.1 .
This can include cases with or without laboratory confirmation.
” There are many potential problems with coding Covid deaths this way .
One problem is again this issue of Covid-19 being listed as “ a cause of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ primary cause of death .
If we look at the technical notes , the CDC ’ s website provides more details : “ Coronavirus disease deaths are identified using the ICD–10 code U07.1 .
Deaths are coded to U07.1 when coronavirus disease 2019 or COVID-19 are reported as a cause that contributed to death on the death certificate .
These can include laboratory confirmed cases , as well as cases without laboratory confirmation .
“ If the certifier suspects COVID-19 or determines it was likely ( e.g.
, the circumstances were compelling within @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they can report COVID-19 as “ probable ” or “ presumed ” on the death certificate ( 5 , 6 ) .
COVID-19 is listed as the underlying cause on the death certificate in 92 % of deaths ( see Table 1 ) .
” Even though this 92 % of cases where Covid was listed as the underlying cause of death is more compelling , 8 % of 241,906 is still a relatively large number , over 19,300 deaths .
Furthermore , if we dig deeper still to understand how robust this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an April report by the NCHS , titled : Guidance for Certifying Deaths Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 ( COVID–19 ) , which is still linked on the CDC ’ s website where it provides details on its data , that it is acceptable to “ report COVID–19 on a death certificate without ” the need for the patient to test positive for Covid-19 : “ An accurate count of the number of deaths due to COVID–19 infection , which depends in part on proper death certification , is critical to ongoing public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ death is due to COVID–19 , it is likely the UCOD and thus , it should be reported on the lowest line used in Part I of the death certificate .
“ Ideally , testing for COVID–19 should be conducted , but it is acceptable to report COVID–19 on a death certificate without this confirmation if the circumstances are compelling within a reasonable degree of certainty.
” ( p.2-p.3 ) .
Even though I understand that this report was published in April , surely for a death to be recorded as being due @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to test positive for Covid-19 .
In my opinion , there needs to be a more robust categorization of what constitutes a Covid-19 death , as the previous , and seemingly current ways of recording Covid-19 deaths are somewhat vague and imprecise , arguably producing an inflated death count .
From my perspective , the main figure countries should use to categorize Covid-19 deaths has to include ( 1 ) the need for the patient to test positive for Covid ; and ( 2 ) the need for a medical professional to examine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the primary , or underlying , cause of death .
This should be the main figure that officials and the media then quote , because the average person who hears what the latest death count is on a 2-minute news segment presumes that this figure actually expresses how many people have died of Covid-19 – not with Covid-19 , not with suspected Covid-19 , but actually of Covid-19 .
Countries could have a secondary number of Covid-19 deaths where Covid is recorded as one of many factors in death , but the main @ @ @ @ @ @ @ individual had Covid-19 , and that Covid-19 was the primary , or underlying , cause of death .
From my interpretation , the way many countries have and continue to categorize Covid-19 deaths produces an inflated death count , giving a distorted impression of the scale of Covid-19 .
Many would argue that the authorities in various countries around the world are well aware of this issue , and are using statistics to generate fear .
To be clear , I am not a statistician , scientist , or medical doctor , although @ @ @ @ @ @ @ statistics and research methods as part of my degree in Politics at university .
But don ’ t just take my word for it that the Covid-19 data is a mess in various ways .
Jamie Jenkins , the former Head of Health Analysis at the Office for National Statistics , has called the Covid-19 data , in the context of Britain , a travesty in various ways .
Additionally , it is important to note that the manipulation of statistics has been a key feature of tyrannical regimes down through history .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Stalinist government constantly supressed or delayed the release of statistics that contradicted their agendas , and only released data that supported their initiatives .
Today , history looks to be repeating itself once again .
Governments around the world are selectively using statistics in a way that inflates the scale of the Covid pandemic .
For instance , over the past month or two , there has been a clear shift in the emphasis that the government and the media are placing on the number of positive Covid-19 cases .
Yet with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have largely failed to contextualise why this was always going to be the case once mass testing began .
It doesn ’ t take a rocket scientist to work out that even if the Covid-19 tests being used are 100 % accurate , the more tests you conduct , the more positive cases you are going to find .
If we take the UK for example , the number of virus tests being conductedhas been increasing month-by-month since May of this year .
On the 1st of May for instance , just under @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the UK .
On the 1stof December , over 40 million virus tests had been conducted .
In November alone , approximately 9 million virus tests were conducted in UK .
Therefore , it is no surprise that there were more positive cases in November than there were in May .
The number of positive cases only becomes even 1 % relevant if there has been a consistent number of tests being conducted over many months , as this gives officials a base to compare too .
Furthermore , what percentage of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sensitive are these tests ?
What is the margin of error in these cases , as some tests are reportedly picking up fragments of dead viruses from infections months ago that are no longer a potential issue ?
There are questions over the validity of the Polymerase Chain Reaction ( PCR ) test for instance , a popular test used .
Kary Mullis , the inventor of the PCR test has said that “ quantitative , PCR is an oxymoron.
” As John Lauritsen , who quoted Mullis in a 1996 article on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ patients , wrote : “ PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively , but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers .
Although there is a common misimpression that the viral load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood , these tests can not detect free , infectious viruses at all ; they can only detect proteins that are believed , in some cases wrongly , to be unique to HIV .
The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses , but not viruses themselves.
” In the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a Covid-19 infection , a spokesperson for Public Health England recently told Reuters that “ detecting viral material by PCR does not indicate that the virus is fully intact and infectious i.e .
able to cause infection in other people.
” Thus , it is important to ask whether many of these positive Covid test results are merely from some tests picking up fragments of dead viruses that no longer pose a risk of infection ?
Furthermore , it is important to establish what type of people are testing positive for Covid-19 ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ irrelevant if a young , healthy person , who is not obese , and who does not have any underlying health conditions , tests positive for Covid-19 .
This is because statistically , as I understand it as someone who is not a medical doctor , it is extremely unlikelythat a young , healthy person will have a bad reaction to Covid-19 , and they may not even know they were ever infected .
Additionally , I would like to bring to your attention a recent story I read in relation to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Independent newspaper states that the UK government has given Pfizer legal indemnity for its vaccine rollout , which protects the pharmaceutical giant from being sued by people who experience any potential issues with the new vaccine .
NHS staff who will be administering the vaccine , are also protected .
Furthermore , it was reported that the Department of Health and Social Care has confirmed that the government would add the new coronavirus vaccine to the list of vaccinations covered by the Vaccine Damages Payments Act .
As the Independent notes , this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people who are permanently disabled ” or injured as a “ result of a listed vaccination.
” Needless to say , this is a worrying sign – I will link the full article in the description .
If we turn our attention back to the question of statistics , there are clearly major issues with the way the Covid-19 death tolls and positive cases are being calculated and measured .
However , the notion that governments around the world that are behaving in a fascist-style manner are using statistics to seemingly control the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ understand history .
As George Orwell wrote in his book 1984 , where he used historical truths and his own insights to predict how a global dictatorial regime of the future would operate , explained : “ Even the written instructions which Winston received , and which he invariably got rid of as soon as he had dealt with them , never stated or implied that an act of forgery was to be committed : always the reference was to slips , errors , misprints , or misquotations which it was necessary to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ But actually , he thought as he re-adjusted the Ministry of Plenty ’ s figures , it was not even forgery .
It was merely the substitution of one piece of nonsense for another .
Most of the material that you were dealing with had no connection with anything in the real world , not even the kind of connection that is contained in a direct lie .
Statistics were just as much a fantasy in their original version as in their rectified version .
A great deal of time you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of your head ” ( Orwell , 2008 : 43 ) .
There are many more issues with the Covid-19 data , including the fact that flu deaths in parts of October reportedly decreasedin Britain and the United States compared to weekly and monthly five-year averages , which in part may be because these deaths have been included as Covid-19 deaths .
In the interest of time however , the main point to emphasis here is simply that there are lies , damn lies , and then there ’ s statistics .
Nathan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is not causation , The Guardian https : //www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2012/jan/06/correlation-causation James Fletcher ( 25 May , 2014 ) Spurious correlations : Margarine linked to divorce ?
BBC News Spurious correlations : Margarine linked to divorce ?
– BBC News Coronavirus in the UK Deaths | Coronavirus in the UK ( data.gov.uk ) Provisional Death Counts for Coronavirus Disease 2019 ( COVID-19 ) , Centres for Disease Control and Prevention Provisional Death Counts for Coronavirus Disease 2019 ( COVID-19 ) ( cdc.gov ) National Center for Health Statistics .
Guidance for certifying deaths due to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Vital Statistics Reference Guidance Number 03 , April , 2020 ( cdc.gov ) Jamie Jenkins ( 9 Jan. 2017 ) Understanding ONS statistics on patient deaths , Office of National Statistics [ this is cited as confirmation of his position at the ONS ] Understanding ONS statistics on patient deaths .
| National Statistical Jamie Jenkins interview with talkradio ( 6 Nov. 2020 ) Covid data ‘ mistakes ’ are ‘ one of the biggest travesties ’ of the pandemic Covid data ‘ mistakes ’ are ‘ one of the biggest travesties @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Gray ( 24 Oct. 2020 ) Drop in flu deaths may indicate that most at risk died from COVID-19 , New York Post Drop in flu deaths may indicate that most at risk died from COVID-19 ( nypost.com ) Bergson , A .
( 1953 ) .
Reliability and Usability of Soviet Statistics : A Summary Appraisal .
The American Statistician , 7 ( 3 ) , 13-16 .
Covid-19 Testing in the UK Daily summary / Coronavirus in the UK ( data.gov.uk ) Rachel Schraer ( 5 Sep. 2020 ) Coronavirus : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ virus , ’ BBC News Coronavirus : Tests ‘ could be picking up dead virus ’ – BBC News John Lauritsen , New York Native 9 Dec. 1996 HAS PROVINCETOWN BECOME PROTEASE TOWN ?
HIV & AIDS – Has Provincetown Become Protease Town ?
( virusmyth.org ) Reuters Staff ( 13 Nov. 2020 ) Fact check : Inventor of method used to test for COVID-19 didn ’ t say it can ’ t be used in virus detection ( Reuters ) Fact check : Inventor of method used to test for COVID-19 didn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be used in virus detection | Reuters SOUMYA KARLAMANGLA ( 11 MARCH , 2020 ) What ’ s the risk of COVID-19 for a healthy young person ?
LA Times What ’ s the coronavirus risk for a healthy young person ?
– Los Angeles Times ( latimes.com ) Shaun Lintern ( 02 Dec , 2020 ) Coronavirus vaccine : Pfizer given protection from legal action by UK government Coronavirus vaccine : Pfizer given protection from legal action by UK government | The Independent

Although people have tragically died from Covid-19, the way the Covid-19 death data is recorded in many countries around the world has produced, and continues to produce, an inflated death toll.
This inflated death toll has then been, and continues to be, used by fascist-style bureaucracies, in conjunction with scientific priesthoods, to terrify the general public into obedience.
One of the most basic laws of statistics is that correlation does not equal causation. Although this may sound complicated, it’s not. It simply means that just because there is a correlation between two variables, or to put this another way, a close relationship between two things in the world, this does not mean that one thing is causing the other thing to happen.
A third factor may be causing the correlation that is observed for instance. As an example, there is usually a correlation in many countries between cold weather and people buying more goods in shops, or online, but this increase in buying is not caused by cold weather.
Instead, it is caused by the Christmas period, when people spend more money, and it just happens to be the case that the weather is usually cold in December in many parts of the world that celebrate Christmas.
So, even though there is a correlation between cold weather and increased buying patterns, cold weather does not cause increased buying patterns, but the Christmas period causes people to buy more goods.
Furthermore, the correlation that is observed between two things in the world may just be a product of random chance.
This has led people to point to some funny correlations, such as the fact that there was a correlation between margarine consumption and divorce rates in the Maine between 2000 and 2009.
There was also a correlation between per capita cheese consumption and the number of people who died by becoming tangled in their bedsheets, or the number of people who drowned by falling into a pool and films Nicholas Cage appeared in. Once again, correlation does not equal causation.
Inflated Death Data
If we turn our attention back to the Covid death data, just because someone has tested positive for Covid-19 and died sometime after (even if we put aside for a second that some tests are known to give false positives), that does not mean that Covid-19 caused that person to die.
Yet, the main figure certain countries around the world are using to express Covid-19 deaths is simply recorded, or coded, as essentially any death involving a positive Covid-19 test within 28 days of death.
Because correlation does not equal causation, simply recording Covid-19 deaths as any deaths involving a positive Covid-19 test within a given period of time is an extremely poor way to measure how many people have died.
For instance, in the UK, the main figure being used for Covid-19 deaths is coded, as stated on the official Coronavirus website, as the “number of deaths of people who had had a positive test result for COVID-19 and died within 28 days of the first positive test.”
This completely ignores the problem of causality, and thus, produces a much larger death toll than there actually is.
For instance, if someone has had an underlying heart condition for 10 years, and has a heart complication and dies, their death was most likely mainly caused by the heart condition that has plagued them for a decade.
However, if that person had tested positive for Covid-19 for the first time within 28 days of them dying, that person could be included as a Covid-19 death in the UK, if all is required to be categorized as a Covid-19 death is simply a positive test result.
For those who understand that the way you code deaths dramatically changes the number of deaths you get, the UK authorities kindly illustrate this for us. There is a second numberrecorded by UK authorities which codes deaths as “people whose death certificate mentioned COVID-19 as one of the causes.”
By coding deaths this way, there are thousands more Covid-19 deaths compared to when deaths are coded as “people who had had a positive test result for COVID-19 and died within 28 days of the first positive test.”
Despite the UK authorities having two ways to code Covid-19 deaths however, none of them are particularly accurate in my opinion.
This is because the positive test figure does not deal with the issue of causality, and the death certificate figure only mentions Covid as needing to be “one of the causes” of death, rather than “the primary cause,” in addition to the death certificate figure not explicitly demanding the need for a positive Covid-19 test result.
US Death Data
If we turn our attention to the United States, we find similar issues with the Covid-19 data.
One of the main figures the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is reporting as the total number of provisional Covid deaths in the United States – which stands at 241,906 deaths at the time I am recording this audio – is presented as “all deaths involving Covid-19.”
If we dig a little deeper, this number is based on “deaths with confirmed or presumed COVID-19, coded to ICD–10 code U07.1.” If we continue to dig, we can better understand how this number is calculated. The CDC’s website states that:
“The National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) uses incoming data from death certificates to produce provisional COVID-19 death counts. These include deaths occurring within the 50 states and the District of Columbia… COVID-19 deaths are identified using a new ICD–10 code.
“When COVID-19 is reported as a cause of death – or when it is listed as a “probable” or “presumed” cause — the death is coded as U07.1. This can include cases with or without laboratory confirmation.”
There are many potential problems with coding Covid deaths this way. One problem is again this issue of Covid-19 being listed as “a cause of death,” as opposed to the primary cause of death. If we look at the technical notes, the CDC’s website provides more details:
“Coronavirus disease deaths are identified using the ICD–10 code U07.1. Deaths are coded to U07.1 when coronavirus disease 2019 or COVID-19 are reported as a cause that contributed to death on the death certificate. These can include laboratory confirmed cases, as well as cases without laboratory confirmation.
“If the certifier suspects COVID-19 or determines it was likely (e.g., the circumstances were compelling within a reasonable degree of certainty), they can report COVID-19 as “probable” or “presumed” on the death certificate (5, 6). COVID-19 is listed as the underlying cause on the death certificate in 92% of deaths (see Table 1).”
Even though this 92% of cases where Covid was listed as the underlying cause of death is more compelling, 8% of 241,906 is still a relatively large number, over 19,300 deaths.
Furthermore, if we dig deeper still to understand how robust this data is, we find out from an April report by the NCHS, titled: Guidance for Certifying Deaths Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID–19), which is still linked on the CDC’s website where it provides details on its data, that it is acceptable to “report COVID–19 on a death certificate without” the need for the patient to test positive for Covid-19:
“An accurate count of the number of deaths due to COVID–19 infection, which depends in part on proper death certification, is critical to ongoing public health surveillance and response. When a death is due to COVID–19, it is likely the UCOD and thus, it should be reported on the lowest line used in Part I of the death certificate.
“Ideally, testing for COVID–19 should be conducted, but it is acceptable to report COVID–19 on a death certificate without this confirmation if the circumstances are compelling within a reasonable degree of certainty.” (p.2-p.3).
Even though I understand that this report was published in April, surely for a death to be recorded as being due to Covid-19, the patient actually has to test positive for Covid-19.
In my opinion, there needs to be a more robust categorization of what constitutes a Covid-19 death, as the previous, and seemingly current ways of recording Covid-19 deaths are somewhat vague and imprecise, arguably producing an inflated death count.
From my perspective, the main figure countries should use to categorize Covid-19 deaths has to include (1) the need for the patient to test positive for Covid; and (2) the need for a medical professional to examine the patient and conclude that Covid-19 was the primary, or underlying, cause of death.
This should be the main figure that officials and the media then quote, because the average person who hears what the latest death count is on a 2-minute news segment presumes that this figure actually expresses how many people have died of Covid-19 – not with Covid-19, not with suspected Covid-19, but actually of Covid-19.
Countries could have a secondary number of Covid-19 deaths where Covid is recorded as one of many factors in death, but the main death toll has to establish that the individual had Covid-19, and that Covid-19 was the primary, or underlying, cause of death.
From my interpretation, the way many countries have and continue to categorize Covid-19 deaths produces an inflated death count, giving a distorted impression of the scale of Covid-19.
Many would argue that the authorities in various countries around the world are well aware of this issue, and are using statistics to generate fear.
To be clear, I am not a statistician, scientist, or medical doctor, although I did take a few classes in statistics and research methods as part of my degree in Politics at university. But don’t just take my word for it that the Covid-19 data is a mess in various ways. Jamie Jenkins, the former Head of Health Analysis at the Office for National Statistics, has called the Covid-19 data, in the context of Britain, a travesty in various ways.
Additionally, it is important to note that the manipulation of statistics has been a key feature of tyrannical regimes down through history. In the Soviet Union for instance, the Stalinist government constantly supressed or delayed the release of statistics that contradicted their agendas, and only released data that supported their initiatives.
Covid Testing
Today, history looks to be repeating itself once again. Governments around the world are selectively using statistics in a way that inflates the scale of the Covid pandemic.
For instance, over the past month or two, there has been a clear shift in the emphasis that the government and the media are placing on the number of positive Covid-19 cases.
Yet with this shift in emphasise, both parties have largely failed to contextualise why this was always going to be the case once mass testing began.
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to work out that even if the Covid-19 tests being used are 100% accurate, the more tests you conduct, the more positive cases you are going to find. If we take the UK for example, the number of virus tests being conductedhas been increasing month-by-month since May of this year.
On the 1st of May for instance, just under one million virus tests had been conducted in the UK. On the 1stof December, over 40 million virus tests had been conducted. In November alone, approximately 9 million virus tests were conducted in UK.
Therefore, it is no surprise that there were more positive cases in November than there were in May. The number of positive cases only becomes even 1% relevant if there has been a consistent number of tests being conducted over many months, as this gives officials a base to compare too.
Furthermore, what percentage of tests are producing false positives? How sensitive are these tests? What is the margin of error in these cases, as some tests are reportedly picking up fragments of dead viruses from infections months ago that are no longer a potential issue?
There are questions over the validity of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test for instance, a popular test used. Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test has said that “quantitative, PCR is an oxymoron.” As John Lauritsen, who quoted Mullis in a 1996 article on the use of PCR tests for HIV patients, wrote:
“PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers. Although there is a common misimpression that the viral load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins that are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be unique to HIV. The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves.”
In the context of using the PCR for determining a Covid-19 infection, a spokesperson for Public Health England recently told Reuters that “detecting viral material by PCR does not indicate that the virus is fully intact and infectious i.e. able to cause infection in other people.”
Thus, it is important to ask whether many of these positive Covid test results are merely from some tests picking up fragments of dead viruses that no longer pose a risk of infection? Furthermore, it is important to establish what type of people are testing positive for Covid-19?
In most cases, it is completely irrelevant if a young, healthy person, who is not obese, and who does not have any underlying health conditions, tests positive for Covid-19. This is because statistically, as I understand it as someone who is not a medical doctor, it is extremely unlikelythat a young, healthy person will have a bad reaction to Covid-19, and they may not even know they were ever infected.
Additionally, I would like to bring to your attention a recent story I read in relation to the Covid-19 jjab. A report in the Independent newspaper states that the UK government has given Pfizer legal indemnity for its jjab rollout, which protects the pharmaceutical giant from being sued by people who experience any potential issues with the new jjab. NHS staff who will be administering the jjab, are also protected.
Furthermore, it was reported that the Department of Health and Social Care has confirmed that the government would add the new coronavirus jjab to the list of vaccinations covered by the Vaccine Damages Payments Act.
As the Independent notes, this gives “a one-off £120,000 payment to people who are permanently disabled” or injured as a “result of a listed vaccination.” Needless to say, this is a worrying sign – I will link the full article in the description.
If we turn our attention back to the question of statistics, there are clearly major issues with the way the Covid-19 death tolls and positive cases are being calculated and measured. However, the notion that governments around the world that are behaving in a fascist-style manner are using statistics to seemingly control the population is nothing unsurprising to those who understand history.
As George Orwell wrote in his book 1984, where he used historical truths and his own insights to predict how a global dictatorial regime of the future would operate, explained:
“Even the written instructions which Winston received, and which he invariably got rid of as soon as he had dealt with them, never stated or implied that an act of forgery was to be committed: always the reference was to slips, errors, misprints, or misquotations which it was necessary to put right in the interests of accuracy.
“But actually, he thought as he re-adjusted the Ministry of Plenty’s figures, it was not even forgery. It was merely the substitution of one piece of nonsense for another. Most of the material that you were dealing with had no connection with anything in the real world, not even the kind of connection that is contained in a direct lie. Statistics were just as much a fantasy in their original version as in their rectified version. A great deal of time you were expected to make them up out of your head” (Orwell, 2008: 43).
There are many more issues with the Covid-19 data, including the fact that flu deaths in parts of October reportedly decreasedin Britain and the United States compared to weekly and monthly five-year averages, which in part may be because these deaths have been included as Covid-19 deaths. In the interest of time however, the main point to emphasis here is simply that there are lies, damn lies, and then there’s statistics.
Soureces: InsightHistory.com; YouTube.com / References:
Nathan Green (6 Jan. 2012) Correlation is not causation, The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2012/jan/06/correlation-causation
James Fletcher (25 May, 2014) Spurious correlations: Margarine linked to divorce? BBC News Spurious correlations: Margarine linked to divorce? – BBC News
Tyler Vigen Spurious Correlations Spurious Correlations (tylervigen.com)
Rachel Schraer (5 Sep. 2020) Coronavirus: Tests ‘could be picking up dead virus,’ BBC News https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-54000629
Coronavirus in the UK Deaths | Coronavirus in the UK (data.gov.uk)
Provisional Death Counts for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), Centres for Disease Control and Prevention Provisional Death Counts for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) (cdc.gov)
Technical Notes, Provisional Death Counts for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Technical Notes: Provisional Death Counts for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) (cdc.gov)
National Center for Health Statistics. Guidance for certifying deaths due to COVID–19. Hyattsville, MD. 2020. Vital Statistics Reference Guidance Number 03, April, 2020 (cdc.gov)
Jamie Jenkins (9 Jan. 2017) Understanding ONS statistics on patient deaths, Office of National Statistics [this is cited as confirmation of his position at the ONS] Understanding ONS statistics on patient deaths. | National Statistical
Jamie Jenkins interview with talkradio (6 Nov. 2020) Covid data ‘mistakes’ are ‘one of the biggest travesties’ of the pandemic Covid data ‘mistakes’ are ‘one of the biggest travesties’ of the pandemic – YouTube
Melanie Gray (24 Oct. 2020) Drop in flu deaths may indicate that most at risk died from COVID-19, New York Post Drop in flu deaths may indicate that most at risk died from COVID-19 (nypost.com)
BBC News (12 Aug. 2020) Coronavirus: England death count review reduces UK toll by 5,000 Coronavirus: England death count review reduces UK toll by 5,000 – BBC News
Bergson, A. (1953). Reliability and Usability of Soviet Statistics: A Summary Appraisal. The American Statistician, 7(3), 13-16.
Covid-19 Testing in the UK Daily summary / Coronavirus in the UK (data.gov.uk)
Rachel Schraer (5 Sep. 2020) Coronavirus: Tests ‘could be picking up dead virus,’ BBC News Coronavirus: Tests ‘could be picking up dead virus’ – BBC News
John Lauritsen, New York Native 9 Dec. 1996 HAS PROVINCETOWN BECOME PROTEASE TOWN? HIV & AIDS – Has Provincetown Become Protease Town? (virusmyth.org)
Reuters Staff (13 Nov. 2020) Fact check: Inventor of method used to test for COVID-19 didn’t say it can’t be used in virus detection (Reuters) Fact check: Inventor of method used to test for COVID-19 didn’t say it can’t be used in virus detection | Reuters
SOUMYA KARLAMANGLA (11 MARCH, 2020) What’s the risk of COVID-19 for a healthy young person? LA Times What’s the coronavirus risk for a healthy young person? – Los Angeles Times (latimes.com)
Shaun Lintern (02 Dec, 2020) Coronavirus jjab: Pfizer given protection from legal action by UK government Coronavirus jjab: Pfizer given protection from legal action by UK government | The Independent
George Orwell (2008) 1984 (London: Penguin) p.43.


humansarefree--2020-12-15--Complaint to the Hague’s International Criminal Court: WHO Chief Should Be Investigated Over GENOCID

Complaint to the Hague’s International Criminal Court: WHO Chief Should Be Investigated Over GENOCIDE

The World Health Organization ’ s head should be probed over genocide , a claim filed with the ICC by a US Nobel Peace Prize nominee says , adding that the Ethiopian may be involved in many crimes at home .
The current World Health Organization ( WHO ) Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus “ was a crucial decision maker in relation to security service actions that included killing , arbitrarily detaining and torturing Ethiopians , ” a complaint filed with the International Criminal Court ( ICC ) says .
Its author , an American economist and activist , David Steinman @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Nobel Peace Prize , alleges that the Ethiopian biologist and health researcher had a role in atrocities committed by various Ethiopian security forces during his tenure as a high-ranking government official .
Prior to taking up the WHO post in 2017 , Adhanom Ghebreyesus first served as Ethiopia ’ s health minister between 2005 and 2012 and later as the nation ’ s foreign minister from 2012 to 2016 .
It was during this time that he supposedly exerted at least partial control over the nation ’ s repressive apparatus , Steinman claims @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are mostly based on a premise that , as a high-ranking government official and a senior member of the Tigray People ’ s Liberation Front party , which was a major member of the ruling coalition at that time , he could not help but have a sway over the nation ’ s law enforcement and military .
“ By virtue of his being a senior TPLF official , Tedros was one of just a handful of Ethiopian officials who exercised control over the Security Forces , ” Steinman says in his complaint @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ unfair government tactics , including intimidation , arbitrary arrest , detention without charge ” and various human rights violations hardly leave anyone an opportunity to give the Ethiopian government officials of that time , including Adhanom Ghebreyesus , “ the benefit of the doubt.
” As for evidence of his accusations , Steinman mostly cites the US State Department ’ s human rights reports as well as accounts provided by Human Rights Watch , Amnesty International and various Western analytical institutions like the University of Birmingham .
Continue reading on RT.com where @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is available HERE .
Also read : Tedros is accused of being a member of the terrorist group the Tigray People ’ s Liberation Front ( TPFL ) , at the beginning of his political career .
The United States has classified the TPFL as a Tier III terrorist organization , which it would mean that the World Health Organization is being led by a terrorist .

The World Health Organization’s head should be probed over genocide, a claim filed with the ICC by a US Nobel Peace Prize nominee says, adding that the Ethiopian may be involved in many crimes at home.
The current World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus “was a crucial decision maker in relation to security service actions that included killing, arbitrarily detaining and torturing Ethiopians,” a complaint filed with the International Criminal Court (ICC) says.
Its author, an American economist and activist, David Steinman, who was nominated for the 2019 Nobel Peace Prize, alleges that the Ethiopian biologist and health researcher had a role in atrocities committed by various Ethiopian security forces during his tenure as a high-ranking government official.
Prior to taking up the WHO post in 2017, Adhanom Ghebreyesus first served as Ethiopia’s health minister between 2005 and 2012 and later as the nation’s foreign minister from 2012 to 2016.
It was during this time that he supposedly exerted at least partial control over the nation’s repressive apparatus, Steinman claims.
The accusations leveled by the American are mostly based on a premise that, as a high-ranking government official and a senior member of the Tigray People’s Liberation Front party, which was a major member of the ruling coalition at that time, he could not help but have a sway over the nation’s law enforcement and military.
“By virtue of his being a senior TPLF official, Tedros was one of just a handful of Ethiopian officials who exercised control over the Security Forces,” Steinman says in his complaint.
He goes on to say that “unfair government tactics, including intimidation, arbitrary arrest, detention without charge” and various human rights violations hardly leave anyone an opportunity to give the Ethiopian government officials of that time, including Adhanom Ghebreyesus, “the benefit of the doubt.”
As for evidence of his accusations, Steinman mostly cites the US State Department’s human rights reports as well as accounts provided by Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and various Western analytical institutions like the University of Birmingham.
Continue reading on RT.com where the article first appeared.
The complaint is available HERE.
Also read: Tedros is accused of being a member of the terrorist group the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPFL), at the beginning of his political career. The United States has classified the TPFL as a Tier III terrorist organization, which it would mean that the World Health Organization is being led by a terrorist.


humansarefree--2020-12-15--No Privacy, No Property: The World in 2030 According to the World Economic Forum

The World Economic Forum ( WEF ) was founded fifty years ago .
It has gained more and more prominence over the decades and has become one of the leading platforms of futuristic thinking and planning .
As a meeting place of the global elite , the WEF brings together the leaders in business and politics along with a few selected intellectuals .
The main thrust of the forum is global control .
Did you know ?
Bill Gates & World Economic Forum Ran Coronavirus Outbreak Simulation Just 6 Weeks Before The Real Outbreak Free markets and individual choice do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but state interventionism and collectivism .
Individual liberty and private property are to disappear from this planet by 2030 according to the projections and scenarios coming from the World Economic Forum .
Individual liberty is at risk again .
What may lie ahead was projected in November 2016 when the WEF published “ 8 Predictions for the World in 2030.
” According to the WEF ’ s scenario , the world will become quite a different place from now because how people work and live will undergo a profound change .
The scenario @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than just a forecast .
It is a plan whose implementation has accelerated drastically since with the announcement of a pandemic and the consequent lockdowns .
According to the projections of the WEF ’ s “ Global Future Councils , ” private property and privacy will be abolished during the next decade .
The coming expropriation would go further than even the communist demand to abolish the property of production goods but leave space for private possessions .
The WEF projection says that consumer goods , too , would be no longer private @ @ @ @ @ @ @ come true , people would have to rent and borrow their necessities from the state , which would be the sole proprietor of all goods .
The supply of goods would be rationed in line with a social credit points system .
Shopping in the traditional sense would disappear along with the private purchases of goods .
Every personal move would be tracked electronically , and all production would be subject to the requirements of clean energy and a sustainable environment .
In order to attain “ sustainable agriculture , ” the food @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the new totalitarian service economy , the government will provide basic accommodation , food , and transport , while the rest must be lent from the state .
The use of natural resources will be brought down to its minimum .
In cooperation with the few key countries , a global agency would set the price of CO2 emissions at an extremely high level to disincentivize its use .
In a promotional video , the World Economic Forum summarizes the eight predictions in the following statements : • People will own nothing .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ must be lent from the state .
• The United States will no longer be the leading superpower , but a handful of countries will dominate .
• Organs will not be transplanted but printed .
• Massive displacement of people will take place with billions of refugees .
• To limit the emission of carbon dioxide , a global price will be set at an exorbitant level .
• People can prepare to go to Mars and start a journey to find alien life .
• Western values will be tested to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to understand what the above 8 points actually mean , please read the following article : By 2030 ‘ You Will Own Nothing ’ — New World Order Detailed

The World Economic Forum (WEF) was founded fifty years ago. It has gained more and more prominence over the decades and has become one of the leading platforms of futuristic thinking and planning.
As a meeting place of the global elite, the WEF brings together the leaders in business and politics along with a few selected intellectuals. The main thrust of the forum is global control.
Did you know? Billy Boy & World Economic Forum Ran Coronavirus Outbreak Simulation Just 6 Weeks Before The Real Outbreak
Free markets and individual choice do not stand as the top values, but state interventionism and collectivism. Individual liberty and private property are to disappear from this planet by 2030 according to the projections and scenarios coming from the World Economic Forum.
Eight Predictions
Individual liberty is at risk again. What may lie ahead was projected in November 2016 when the WEF published “8 Predictions for the World in 2030.” According to the WEF’s scenario, the world will become quite a different place from now because how people work and live will undergo a profound change.
The scenario for the world in 2030 is more than just a forecast. It is a plan whose implementation has accelerated drastically since with the announcement of a pandemic and the consequent lockdowns.
According to the projections of the WEF’s “Global Future Councils,” private property and privacy will be abolished during the next decade.
The coming expropriation would go further than even the communist demand to abolish the property of production goods but leave space for private possessions. The WEF projection says that consumer goods, too, would be no longer private property.
If the WEF projection should come true, people would have to rent and borrow their necessities from the state, which would be the sole proprietor of all goods. The supply of goods would be rationed in line with a social credit points system.
Shopping in the traditional sense would disappear along with the private purchases of goods. Every personal move would be tracked electronically, and all production would be subject to the requirements of clean energy and a sustainable environment.
In order to attain “sustainable agriculture,” the food supply will be mainly vegetarian. In the new totalitarian service economy, the government will provide basic accommodation, food, and transport, while the rest must be lent from the state. The use of natural resources will be brought down to its minimum.
In cooperation with the few key countries, a global agency would set the price of CO2 emissions at an extremely high level to disincentivize its use.
In a promotional video, the World Economic Forum summarizes the eight predictions in the following statements:
People will own nothing. Goods are either free of charge or must be lent from the state. The United States will no longer be the leading superpower, but a handful of countries will dominate. Organs will not be transplanted but printed. Meat consumption will be minimized. Massive displacement of people will take place with billions of refugees. To limit the emission of carbon dioxide, a global price will be set at an exorbitant level. People can prepare to go to Mars and start a journey to find alien life. Western values will be tested to the breaking point.
If you want to understand what the above 8 points actually mean, please read the following article: By 2030 ‘You Will Own Nothing’ — New World Order Detailed
Source: MISES.org (excerpt)


humansarefree--2020-12-15--Obama Jokes About Not Being Born in the USA: ‘I Was Able to Get Away With It’ — And Here’s Proof He

Obama Jokes About Not Being Born in the USA: ‘I Was Able to Get Away With It’ — And Here’s Proof He Was Born in Kenya