humansarefree--2020-08-05--Bulgarian Pathology Association: COVID-19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless

Though the whole world relies on RT-PCR to “ diagnose ” Sars-Cov-2 infection , the science is clear : they are not fit for purpose Lockdowns and hygienic measures around the world are based on numbers of cases and mortality rates created by the so-called SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests used to identify “ positive ” patients , whereby “ positive ” is usually equated with “ infected.
” But looking closely at the facts , the conclusion is that these PCR tests are meaningless as a diagnostic tool to determine an alleged infection by a supposedly new virus called SARS-CoV-2 .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ March 16 , 2020 , the WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said : “ We have a simple message for all countries : test , test , test.
” The message was spread through headlines around the world , for instance by Reuters and the BBC .
Still on the 3 of May , the moderator of the heute journal — one of the most important news magazines on German television— was passing the mantra of the corona dogma on to his audience with the admonishing words : “ Test , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the moment , and it is the only way to really understand how much the coronavirus is spreading.
” This indicates that the belief in the validity of the PCR tests is so strong that it equals a religion that tolerates virtually no contradiction .
But it is well known that religions are about faith and not about scientific facts .
And as Walter Lippmann , the two-time Pulitzer Prize winner and perhaps the most influential journalist of the 20th century said : “ Where all think alike , no one thinks very @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is very remarkable that Kary Mullis himself , the inventor of the Polymerase Chain Reaction ( PCR ) technology , did not think alike .
His invention got him the Nobel prize in chemistry in 1993 .
Unfortunately , Mullis passed away last year at the age of 74 , but there is no doubt that the biochemist regarded the PCR as inappropriate to detect a viral infection .
The reason is that the intended use of the PCR was , and still is , to apply it as a manufacturing technique , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and billions of times , and not as a diagnostic tool to detect viruses .
How declaring virus pandemics based on PCR tests can end in disaster was described by Gina Kolata in her 2007 New York Times article Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn ’ t .
Moreover , it is worth mentioning that the PCR tests used to identify so-called COVID-19 patients presumably infected by what is called SARS-CoV-2 do not have a valid gold standard to compare them with .
This is a fundamental point .
Tests @ @ @ @ @ @ @ preciseness — strictly speaking their “ sensitivity ” [ 1 ] and “ specificity ” — by comparison with a “ gold standard , ” meaning the most accurate method available .
As an example , for a pregnancy test the gold standard would be the pregnancy itself .
But as Australian infectious diseases specialist Sanjaya Senanayake , for example , stated in an ABC TV interview in an answer to the question “ How accurate is the [ COVID-19 ] testing ?
” : “ If we had a new test for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ staph in blood , we ’ ve already got blood cultures , that ’ s our gold standard we ’ ve been using for decades , and we could match this new test against that .
But for COVID-19 we don ’ t have a gold standard test.
” Jessica C. Watson from Bristol University confirms this .
In her paper “ Interpreting a COVID-19 test result ” , published recently in The British Medical Journal , she writes that there is a “ lack of such a clear-cut ‘ gold-standard ’ for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the tests as unsuitable for SARS-CoV-2 detection and COVID-19 diagnosis , or instead of pointing out that only a virus , proven through isolation and purification , can be a solid gold standard , Watson claims in all seriousness that , “ pragmatically ” COVID-19 diagnosis itself , remarkably including PCR testing itself , “ may be the best available ‘ gold standard ’ .
” But this is not scientifically sound .
Apart from the fact that it is downright absurd to take the PCR test itself as part of the gold @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19 , as even people such as Thomas Löscher , former head of the Department of Infection and Tropical Medicine at the University of Munich and member of the Federal Association of German Internists , conceded to us [ 2 ] .
And if there are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19 , COVID-19 diagnosis — contrary to Watson ’ s statement — can not be suitable for serving as a valid gold standard .
In addition , “ experts ” such as Watson overlook the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
an unequivocal virus proof , can be the gold standard .
That is why I asked Watson how COVID-19 diagnosis “ may be the best available gold standard , ” if there are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19 , and also whether the virus itself , that is virus isolation , wouldn ’ t be the best available/possible gold standard .
But she hasn ’ t answered these questions yet – despite multiple requests .
And she has not yet responded to our rapid response post on her article in which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ either , though she wrote us on June 2nd : “ I will try to post a reply later this week when I have a chance.
” NO PROOF FOR THE RNA BEING OF VIRAL ORIGIN Now the question is : What is required first for virus isolation/proof ?
We need to know where the RNA for which the PCR tests are calibrated comes from .
As textbooks ( e.g.
, White/Fenner .
Medical Virology , 1986 , p. 9 ) as well as leading virus researchers such as Luc Montagnier or Dominic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
the separation of an object from everything else that is not that object , as for instance Nobel laureate Marie Curie purified 100 mg of radium chloride in 1898 by extracting it from tons of pitchblende — is an essential pre-requisite for proving the existence of a virus , and thus to prove that the RNA from the particle in question comes from a new virus .
The reason for this is that PCR is extremely sensitive , which means it can detect even the smallest pieces of DNA or RNA — @ @ @ @ @ @ @ particles came from .
That has to be determined beforehand .
And because the PCR tests are calibrated for gene sequences ( in this case RNA sequences because SARS-CoV-2 is believed to be a RNA virus ) , we have to know that these gene snippets are part of the looked-for virus .
And to know that , correct isolation and purification of the presumed virus has to be executed .
Hence , we have asked the science teams of the relevant papers which are referred to in the context of SARS-CoV-2 for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their in vitro experiments show purified viruses .
But not a single team could answer that question with “ yes ” — and NB.
, nobody said purification was not a necessary step .
We only got answers like “ No , we did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification ” ( see below ) .
Study 1 : Leo L. M. Poon ; Malik Peiris .
“ Emergence of a novel human coronavirus threatening human health ” Nature Medicine , March 2020 Replying Author : Malik Peiris Date @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ The image is the virus budding from an infected cell .
It is not purified virus.
” Study 2 : Myung-Guk Han et al .
“ Identification of Coronavirus Isolated from a Patient in Korea with COVID-19 ” , Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives , February 2020 Replying Author : Myung-Guk Han Date : May 6 , 2020 Answer : “ We could not estimate the degree of purification because we do not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in cells.
” Study 3 : Wan Beom Park et al .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ with SARS-CoV-2 in Korea ” , Journal of Korean Medical Science , February 24 , 2020 Replying Author : Wan Beom Park Date : March 19 , 2020 Answer : “ We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification.
” Study 4 : Na Zhu et al.
, “ A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China ” , 2019 , New England Journal of Medicine , February 20 , 2020 Replying Author : Wenjie Tan Date : March 18 , 2020 Answer : “ [ We show @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , not purified ones.
” For more read the article here .

Though the whole world relies on RT-PCR to “diagnose” Sars-Cov-2 infection, the science is clear: they are not fit for purpose
Lockdowns and hygienic measures around the world are based on numbers of cases and mortality rates created by the so-called SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests used to identify “positive” patients, whereby “positive” is usually equated with “infected.”
But looking closely at the facts, the conclusion is that these PCR tests are meaningless as a diagnostic tool to determine an alleged infection by a supposedly new virus called SARS-CoV-2.
UNFOUNDED “TEST, TEST, TEST,…” MANTRA
At the media briefing on COVID-19 on March 16, 2020, the WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said:
“We have a simple message for all countries: test, test, test.”
The message was spread through headlines around the world, for instance by Reuters and the BBC.
Still on the 3 of May, the moderator of the heute journal — one of the most important news magazines on German television— was passing the mantra of the corona dogma on to his audience with the admonishing words:
“Test, test, test—that is the credo at the moment, and it is the only way to really understand how much the coronavirus is spreading.”
This indicates that the belief in the validity of the PCR tests is so strong that it equals a religion that tolerates virtually no contradiction.
But it is well known that religions are about faith and not about scientific facts. And as Walter Lippmann, the two-time Pulitzer Prize winner and perhaps the most influential journalist of the 20th century said: “Where all think alike, no one thinks very much.”
So to start, it is very remarkable that Kary Mullis himself, the inventor of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology, did not think alike. His invention got him the Nobel prize in chemistry in 1993.
Unfortunately, Mullis passed away last year at the age of 74, but there is no doubt that the biochemist regarded the PCR as inappropriate to detect a viral infection.
The reason is that the intended use of the PCR was, and still is, to apply it as a manufacturing technique, being able to replicate DNA sequences millions and billions of times, and not as a diagnostic tool to detect viruses.
How declaring virus pandemics based on PCR tests can end in disaster was described by Gina Kolata in her 2007 New York Times article Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t.
LACK OF A VALID GOLD STANDARD
Moreover, it is worth mentioning that the PCR tests used to identify so-called COVID-19 patients presumably infected by what is called SARS-CoV-2 do not have a valid gold standard to compare them with.
This is a fundamental point. Tests need to be evaluated to determine their preciseness — strictly speaking their “sensitivity”[1] and “specificity” — by comparison with a “gold standard,” meaning the most accurate method available.
As an example, for a pregnancy test the gold standard would be the pregnancy itself. But as Australian infectious diseases specialist Sanjaya Senanayake, for example, stated in an ABC TV interview in an answer to the question “How accurate is the [COVID-19] testing?”:
“If we had a new test for picking up [the bacterium] golden staph in blood, we’ve already got blood cultures, that’s our gold standard we’ve been using for decades, and we could match this new test against that. But for COVID-19 we don’t have a gold standard test.”
Jessica C. Watson from Bristol University confirms this. In her paper “Interpreting a COVID-19 test result”, published recently in The British Medical Journal, she writes that there is a “lack of such a clear-cut ‘gold-standard’ for COVID-19 testing.”
But instead of classifying the tests as unsuitable for SARS-CoV-2 detection and COVID-19 diagnosis, or instead of pointing out that only a virus, proven through isolation and purification, can be a solid gold standard, Watson claims in all seriousness that, “pragmatically” COVID-19 diagnosis itself, remarkably including PCR testing itself, “may be the best available ‘gold standard’.” But this is not scientifically sound.
Apart from the fact that it is downright absurd to take the PCR test itself as part of the gold standard to evaluate the PCR test, there are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19, as even people such as Thomas Löscher, former head of the Department of Infection and Tropical Medicine at the University of Munich and member of the Federal Association of German Internists, conceded to us[2].
And if there are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19, COVID-19 diagnosis — contrary to Watson’s statement — cannot be suitable for serving as a valid gold standard.
In addition, “experts” such as Watson overlook the fact that only virus isolation, i.e. an unequivocal virus proof, can be the gold standard.
That is why I asked Watson how COVID-19 diagnosis “may be the best available gold standard,” if there are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19, and also whether the virus itself, that is virus isolation, wouldn’t be the best available/possible gold standard. But she hasn’t answered these questions yet – despite multiple requests.
And she has not yet responded to our rapid response post on her article in which we address exactly the same points, either, though she wrote us on June 2nd: “I will try to post a reply later this week when I have a chance.”
NO PROOF FOR THE RNA BEING OF VIRAL ORIGIN
Now the question is: What is required first for virus isolation/proof? We need to know where the RNA for which the PCR tests are calibrated comes from.
As textbooks (e.g., White/Fenner. Medical Virology, 1986, p. 9) as well as leading virus researchers such as Luc Montagnier or Dominic Dwyer state, particle purification — i.e. the separation of an object from everything else that is not that object, as for instance Nobel laureate Marie Curie purified 100 mg of radium chloride in 1898 by extracting it from tons of pitchblende — is an essential pre-requisite for proving the existence of a virus, and thus to prove that the RNA from the particle in question comes from a new virus.
The reason for this is that PCR is extremely sensitive, which means it can detect even the smallest pieces of DNA or RNA — but it cannot determine where these particles came from. That has to be determined beforehand.
And because the PCR tests are calibrated for gene sequences (in this case RNA sequences because SARS-CoV-2 is believed to be a RNA virus), we have to know that these gene snippets are part of the looked-for virus. And to know that, correct isolation and purification of the presumed virus has to be executed.
Hence, we have asked the science teams of the relevant papers which are referred to in the context of SARS-CoV-2 for proof whether the electron-microscopic shots depicted in their in vitro experiments show purified viruses.
But not a single team could answer that question with “yes” — and NB., nobody said purification was not a necessary step. We only got answers like “No, we did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification” (see below).
Study 1: Leo L. M. Poon; Malik Peiris. “Emergence of a novel human coronavirus threatening human health” Nature Medicine, March 2020
Replying Author: Malik Peiris
Date: May 12, 2020
Answer: “The image is the virus budding from an infected cell. It is not purified virus.”
Study 2: Myung-Guk Han et al. “Identification of Coronavirus Isolated from a Patient in Korea with COVID-19”, Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives, February 2020
Replying Author: Myung-Guk Han
Date: May 6, 2020
Answer: “We could not estimate the degree of purification because we do not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in cells.”
Study 3: Wan Beom Park et al. “Virus Isolation from the First Patient with SARS-CoV-2 in Korea”, Journal of Korean Medical Science, February 24, 2020
Replying Author: Wan Beom Park
Date: March 19, 2020
Answer: “We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification.”
Study 4: Na Zhu et al., “A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China”, 2019, New England Journal of Medicine, February 20, 2020
Replying Author: Wenjie Tan
Date: March 18, 2020
Answer: “[We show] an image of sedimented virus particles, not purified ones.”
For more read the article here.
Source: BPA-pathology.com


humansarefree--2020-08-06--5 Ways ‘The New Normal’ is Getting Worse and Worse

From mandatory masks to mandatory tests to mandatory track-and-trace , the roll-out is on .
It ’ s been a big few days for the New Normal narrative and , through the deliberately cultivated haze of confusion , it ’ s not hard to see the world they want to build is taking shape .
The state of Victoria , and the city of Melbourne , have declared a “ state of disaster ” and instituted a lockdown and curfew .
The state ’ s 6.3 million inhabitants , nearly 5 million in the city , have to follow these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are not deemed essential will close or reduce their hours from Wednesday midnight but services such as supermarkets , petrol stations and doctors will remain open .
• “ Permitted ” or essential workers will have to carry a special permit to work outside the home .
• There is a nightly curfew in force : between the hours of 8pm and 5am you can not leave home except for work or to get or provide urgent care .
• You must stay within five kilometres of your home to shop or exercise @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to exercise , it should be for only one hour each day .
• While up to two people can still exercise together , people should shop on their own – groups in public , even from the same household , are no longer allowed .
• Schools will shift to remote learning except for vulnerable students and children of permitted workers .
• Childcare centres will close to all but vulnerable children and those of essential workers .
• Funerals can continue with a maximum of 10 people but weddings are off @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Since march , Australia has had 247 Covid19 deaths , across the entire country .
The median age of these deaths is over 80 .
2 .
UK Dcotor : “ Men should take female hormones to prevent Covid19 infection ” Dr Amir Khan appeared on ITV ’ s Good Morning Britain today , suggesting men – who are notionally at increased risk of coronavirus infection – should take a contraceptive pill filled with oestrogen .
His theory , which he did not support with research , is that the oestrogen will boost @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a big deal , potentially dangerous and seriously life-changing .
To suggest its use to treat a disease which is harmless in over 95 % of cases is borderline insanity , especially with no research to back it up .
We tweeted about at the time , but GMB ’ s twitter account has since deleted the video .
At a time when doctors are named-and-shamed ( and even fired ) for suggesting a known safe medicine like HCQ , or sites like ours are branded “ misinformation ” for pointing out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a man should appear on national television making such ridiculous claims boggles the mind .
Dr Deborah Birx recently announced that people in high-risk areas or multi-generational homes should consider wearing masks at home as well .
Elsewhere , The Guardian ran an article titled “ You ’ re already wearing a mask – now consider a face shield and goggles ” , which echoes Dr Fauci claiming that “ perfect ” virus protection would involve wearing visors or googles over your eyes .
It has since been confirmed genuine .
In the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ going door-to-door to test people .
The mayor of Leicester said on the Leicester council website : “ Testing is vitally important as it provides us with the information we need to track the virus [ … ] That ’ s why we ’ re helping to run the biggest testing operation in the country , mobilising around 500 volunteers to support door-to-door testing , particularly in areas of the city where positive test results have been higher.
” That ’ s not all the testing news either , new 90 minute tests @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as soon as possible , with a DNA based test set to be rolled out nation wide in September which will “ eliminate false negatives ” .
There is not one word in the article about “ eliminating ” false positives , which are very common in all PCR-based testing .
So prepare for a huge wave of “ new cases ” when these tests enter wide circulation .
If you don ’ t like being forced to wear masks ( and/or visors ) , or being placed under house arrest or ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , or indeed , having to take hormone treatments… well don ’ t worry .
Because the World Economic Forum has the solution – immunity passports .
This is not a new idea , it ’ s been floating around for months , but now the WEF is actually pushing an app that… “ uses blockchain technology to store encrypted data from individual blood tests , allowing users to prove that they have tested negative for COVID-19.
” It goes on to say that using this kind of app is the only solution @ @ @ @ @ @ @ old ) normal : “ CovidPass could also allow hotels , cinemas , theatres , sporting and concert venues to reopen safely.
” If you think this all sounds like something from a dystopian novel , well you ’ re right .
But there ’ s a silver lining .
The app which uses your medical history to decide if you ’ re allowed to travel will be real environmentally friendly : “ CovidPass commits to mandatory carbon offsetting for each flight passenger , to preserve the environmental benefits of reduced air travel @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s that , at least .
It ’ s not hard to see the pattern taking shape here .
Increasingly strict social controls on what you can wear , where you can go , when you can go there and so on and so on… and then the proposed solution .
A brief test and a little app that tracks your movement , or labels you nice and clean , a brand new vaccination for anybody who wants it ( and most of the people who don ’ t ) and then we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is manipulative blackmail of the worst kind , and it appears to be working .

From mandatory masks to mandatory tests to mandatory track-and-trace, the roll-out is on.
by Kit Knightly
It’s been a big few days for the New Normal narrative and, through the deliberately cultivated haze of confusion, it’s not hard to see the world they want to build is taking shape.
1. Australia’s Curfew
The state of Victoria, and the city of Melbourne, have declared a “state of disaster” and instituted a lockdown and curfew. The state’s 6.3 million inhabitants, nearly 5 million in the city, have to follow these restrictions:
Workplaces and shops that are not deemed essential will close or reduce their hours from Wednesday midnight but services such as supermarkets, petrol stations and doctors will remain open.
“Permitted” or essential workers will have to carry a special permit to work outside the home.
There is a nightly curfew in force: between the hours of 8pm and 5am you cannot leave home except for work or to get or provide urgent care.
You must stay within five kilometres of your home to shop or exercise.
If you leave the house to exercise, it should be for only one hour each day.
While up to two people can still exercise together, people should shop on their own – groups in public, even from the same household, are no longer allowed.
Schools will shift to remote learning except for vulnerable students and children of permitted workers.
Childcare centres will close to all but vulnerable children and those of essential workers.
Funerals can continue with a maximum of 10 people but weddings are off except for rare, compassionate reasons.
Since march, Australia has had 247 Covid19 deaths, across the entire country. The median age of these deaths is over 80.
2. UK Dcotor: “Men should take female hormones to prevent Covid19 infection”
Dr Amir Khan appeared on ITV’s Good Morning Britain today, suggesting men – who are notionally at increased risk of coronavirus infection – should take a contraceptive pill filled with oestrogen. His theory, which he did not support with research, is that the oestrogen will boost the male immune system.
Hormone treatment is a big deal, potentially dangerous and seriously life-changing. To suggest its use to treat a disease which is harmless in over 95% of cases is borderline insanity, especially with no research to back it up. We tweeted about at the time, but GMB’s twitter account has since deleted the video.
At a time when doctors are named-and-shamed (and even fired) for suggesting a known safe medicine like HCQ, or sites like ours are branded “misinformation” for pointing out that PCR tests are unreliable, that a man should appear on national television making such ridiculous claims boggles the mind.
3. Mandatory Masks Weren’t Enough
Dr Deborah Birx recently announced that people in high-risk areas or multi-generational homes should consider wearing masks at home as well.
Elsewhere, The Guardian ran an article titled “You’re already wearing a mask – now consider a face shield and goggles”, which echoes Dr Fauci claiming that “perfect” virus protection would involve wearing visors or googles over your eyes.
4. Door to Doors tests in Leicester
Independent Journalist Anna Brees recently posted this image to twitter:
It has since been confirmed genuine. In the UK city of Leicester they are literally going door-to-door to test people. The mayor of Leicester said on the Leicester council website:
“Testing is vitally important as it provides us with the information we need to track the virus […] That’s why we’re helping to run the biggest testing operation in the country, mobilising around 500 volunteers to support door-to-door testing, particularly in areas of the city where positive test results have been higher.”
That’s not all the testing news either, new 90 minute tests are set to be used in schools as soon as possible, with a DNA based test set to be rolled out nation wide in September which will “eliminate false negatives”.
There is not one word in the article about “eliminating” false positives, which are very common in all PCR-based testing. So prepare for a huge wave of “new cases” when these tests enter wide circulation.
5. World Economic Forum pushing “immunity passports”
If you don’t like being forced to wear masks (and/or visors), or being placed under house arrest or (for some reason) under a curfew, or indeed, having to take hormone treatments… well don’t worry. Because the World Economic Forum has the solution – immunity passports.
This is not a new idea, it’s been floating around for months, but now the WEF is actually pushing an app that…
“uses blockchain technology to store encrypted data from individual blood tests, allowing users to prove that they have tested negative for COVID-19.”
It goes on to say that using this kind of app is the only solution to getting everything back to (the old) normal:
“CovidPass could also allow hotels, cinemas, theatres, sporting and concert venues to reopen safely.”
If you think this all sounds like something from a dystopian novel, well you’re right. But there’s a silver lining. The app which uses your medical history to decide if you’re allowed to travel will be real environmentally friendly:
“CovidPass commits to mandatory carbon offsetting for each flight passenger, to preserve the environmental benefits of reduced air travel during the crisis.”
So there’s that, at least.
It’s not hard to see the pattern taking shape here. Increasingly strict social controls on what you can wear, where you can go, when you can go there and so on and so on… and then the proposed solution.
A brief test and a little app that tracks your movement, or labels you nice and clean, a brand new vaccination for anybody who wants it (and most of the people who don’t) and then we can get back to normal.
It is manipulative blackmail of the worst kind, and it appears to be working.


humansarefree--2020-08-06--Silence from New York Times as Leaked Bodycam Videos Contradict Floyd Arrest Narrative

The New York Times has been covering George Floyd ’ s death relentlessly and stoking racial tensions ever since the incident took place in late May , but they were curiously silent about bodycam footage of Minneapolis police arresting him that was recently leaked to the Daily Mail that pokes holes in their narrative .
The footage was published on Monday , August 3 .
According to Information Liberation , more than 24 hours later , a search of the Times ’ archive only showed a single mention of the video ’ s release , which was a reprint of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bombshell details and did not link to the video .
The article instead focused on an investigation into who was behind the leak .
And despite being major news related to a topic they ’ ve been discussing nonstop , they did not tweet the article or share it in a prominent place on their website .
The footage shows very clearly that Floyd resisted arrest .
He said that he could not breathe while he was still standing up and breathing , indicating that he had trouble breathing ( or thought he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ knee on his neck .
He also said that he couldn ’ t enter the police SUV because he was “ claustrophobic ” despite the video showing him sitting comfortably a few minutes earlier in his own SUV .
Nevertheless , an officer can be heard in the video saying he would roll the windows down on the car and turn the air conditioning on for him .
He also told police that his mother had just died , but the truth is that she had been dead for two years .
Moreover @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the police to put him on the ground .
Perhaps most significantly , he told police that he was not on drugs .
This is clearly a lie , as exposed by his official autopsy report , which said that the man had enough fentanyl in his system to kill a person , along with methamphetamine and THC from marijuana .
The autopsy also indicated that no life-threatening injuries were identified , although he did have a slew of heart conditions , including severe arteriosclerotic heart disease , an enlarged heart , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ small amount of fentanyl is all it takes to cause respiratory depression , so although the fentanyl alone was enough to kill him , any of these other factors could have also played a role in his inability to breathe .
Toxicology Report : George Floyd Died From A Concentration Of Fentanyl In His Blood 3x The Fatal Dose Why isn ’ t this story getting wider coverage ?
The Daily Mail received the videos from the bodycams of officers Alex Kueng and Thomas Lane exclusively from an unnamed source .
There are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s bodycam and 18 minutes from Kueng ’ s bodycam .
Transcripts from the videos were released last month , and journalists and the public were allowed to view the video footage by appointment .
A motion filed by a coalition of news organizations asking for public access is being considered by Judge Peter Cahill .
The video shows a man who drove while he was high on a lethal dose of drugs and was stopped by police for passing counterfeit money to a small business owner actively resisting arrest and lying to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ surprising that much of the mainstream media is pretending like this video does not exist and that nothing on it ever happened .
Let ’ s not overlook the significance of the video being leaked by a foreign news source , while the mainstream media in the U.S. continues to make a hero out of a man with a history of violent crime .
People died , businesses and livelihoods were destroyed , police officers were attacked , and cities were damaged because of a situation that the mainstream media completely blew out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ agenda to destroy this country and its leadership .

The New York Times has been covering George Floyd’s death relentlessly and stoking racial tensions ever since the incident took place in late May, but they were curiously silent about bodycam footage of Minneapolis police arresting him that was recently leaked to the Daily Mail that pokes holes in their narrative.
The footage was published on Monday, August 3. According to Information Liberation, more than 24 hours later, a search of the Times’ archive only showed a single mention of the video’s release, which was a reprint of an AP article that left out the bombshell details and did not link to the video.
The article instead focused on an investigation into who was behind the leak. And despite being major news related to a topic they’ve been discussing nonstop, they did not tweet the article or share it in a prominent place on their website.
The footage shows very clearly that Floyd resisted arrest. He said that he could not breathe while he was still standing up and breathing, indicating that he had trouble breathing (or thought he did) even before anyone placed a knee on his neck.
He also said that he couldn’t enter the police SUV because he was “claustrophobic” despite the video showing him sitting comfortably a few minutes earlier in his own SUV.
Nevertheless, an officer can be heard in the video saying he would roll the windows down on the car and turn the air conditioning on for him. He also told police that his mother had just died, but the truth is that she had been dead for two years. Moreover, the video confirms that he asked the police to put him on the ground.
Perhaps most significantly, he told police that he was not on drugs. This is clearly a lie, as exposed by his official autopsy report, which said that the man had enough fentanyl in his system to kill a person, along with methamphetamine and THC from marijuana.
The autopsy also indicated that no life-threatening injuries were identified, although he did have a slew of heart conditions, including severe arteriosclerotic heart disease, an enlarged heart, and a history of hypertension.
Just a small amount of fentanyl is all it takes to cause respiratory depression, so although the fentanyl alone was enough to kill him, any of these other factors could have also played a role in his inability to breathe.
Toxicology Report: George Floyd Died From A Concentration Of Fentanyl In His Blood 3x The Fatal Dose
Why isn’t this story getting wider coverage?
The Daily Mail received the videos from the bodycams of officers Alex Kueng and Thomas Lane exclusively from an unnamed source. There are 10 minutes of footage from Lane’s bodycam and 18 minutes from Kueng’s bodycam.
Transcripts from the videos were released last month, and journalists and the public were allowed to view the video footage by appointment. A motion filed by a coalition of news organizations asking for public access is being considered by Judge Peter Cahill.
The video shows a man who drove while he was high on a lethal dose of drugs and was stopped by police for passing counterfeit money to a small business owner actively resisting arrest and lying to officers. It is disappointing but not surprising that much of the mainstream media is pretending like this video does not exist and that nothing on it ever happened.
Let’s not overlook the significance of the video being leaked by a foreign news source, while the mainstream media in the U.S. continues to make a hero out of a man with a history of violent crime.
People died, businesses and livelihoods were destroyed, police officers were attacked, and cities were damaged because of a situation that the mainstream media completely blew out of proportion to help push their leftist agenda to destroy this country and its leadership.


humansarefree--2020-08-06--Destroying Western Media’s “Swedish Public Health Disaster” Narrative In Two Simple Charts

In order to control public opinion of the masses , the ruling class should “ regiment the public mind every bit as much as an army regiments [ soldiers ’ ] bodies.
” – Edward Bernays , Propaganda ( 1928 ) “ The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society .
Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country .
( … ) “ We are governed , our minds are molded , our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ largely by men we have never heard of .
This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized .
Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society .
( … ) “ In almost every act of our daily lives , whether in the sphere of politics or business , in our social conduct or our ethical thinking , we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons…who understand the mental processes and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.
” – Edward Bernays , Propaganda ( 1928 ) Recently , the Western media has made a point to publish a plethora of stories about the public health disaster of Sweden ’ s no lockdown policy in order to deliberately discredit , in the minds of most people , the only science-based approach to covid19 undertaken by any nation in the world .
Since the end of July , there have been a lot of completely false and misleading stories about the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ policy and Sweden officials ’ choices to not tyrannically shut down businesses in Sweden , to only suggest that the elderly vulnerable population self-quarantine , and to allow for the complete normalization of life under the conditions .
Of course , the criticisms of portraying life as completely normal in Sweden had some merit .
The most normalized behavior occurred in Stockholm , and though no businesses were ordered to close , some more cautious , conservative business owners chose to shut down their cinemas and ski resorts chose to voluntarily close and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shrink by 4 % .
Still a 4 % annual shrinkage in GDP is 1000 times more preferable to the annual pace of a 32.9 % drop in GDP forecast in America just this past quarter .
Furthermore , if the most human interaction is happening in Stockholm , the most densely populated city in Sweden with a central population of 1.5M and a metropolitan population of over 2.4M , then this fact would serve as stronger proof , not weaker proof , that their no-lockdown , normal life behavior approach was a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and humanitarian approach starkly contrasted with the totalitarian , misanthropic ruling class ’ s approach to restrict the movements of everyone , including fully-abled healthy people with strong immune systems , and legislating mandated stay-at-home orders for large swaths of entire nations , orders which the United Nations claim may bring 260 million people to the verge of starvation by year ’ s end , which would make the State leaders responsible for an outcome , if it happens , guilty of genocide on a scale that would make Hitler , Mao , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ appear as child ’ s play .
In fact , in response to my legitimate claims that Sweden ’ s no-lockdown response was the only science-based response to covid 19 in the entire world , and also , non-coincidentally , the most successful response , I heard many Westerners attempt to rebut my arguments with counterclaims that were not the result of any research or intellect , but the consequence of obedient parroting of Western media headlines , that on the surface , seemed to dispute the science I had presented .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rates with its no lockdown policy , the only State that dared stand up to the global banking cartel that was likely behind the global economic lockdown policy , the Western mass media deployed a pre-emptive counterstrike by literally releasing hundreds of articles about the grave “ failure ” of Sweden ’ s no lockdown policy and disseminating these articles to millions of websites online .
So even though I debunked their false claims already in this article , since social media has reduced everyone ’ s attention span to small chunks of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the exception of a handful for every million , I ’ ve created a couple of charts , drawing data from the sites of the US Centers for Disease Control and Folkhälsomyndigheten , the Public Health Agency of Sweden , to address this problem whereby the false Western mass media narrative about Sweden ’ s virus response will be destroyed in a glance .
In the top chart , when we compare the mortality rates of covid19 in Sweden v. the US , including all data until the end of July , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ covid 19 in the age group of less than 39 years of age was 0.58 % , more than 1,230 times greater than the 0.00047 % mortality rate of Sweden .
Furthermore , in the age demographics of 40-59 and 59-69 , the death rate in the US from covid19 versus Sweden was respectively 215 times and 211 times greater than Sweden .
In the bottom chart , I compared Sweden ’ s mortality rate for different age demographics compared to the US mortality rate for the common flu .
For the comprehensive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 60 years of age , the Swedish mortality rate of covid19 is less than 1/3rd of the American mortality rate for the common flu .
Clearly , as can be easily observed in the bottom chart , the overall covid19 mortality rate for Sweden ’ s population was greatly skewed by nearly all covid19 deaths occurring in the above 70 year old demographic , with the majority of Sweden ’ s covid19 deaths occurring in those older than 80 and 90 years of age !
I created the above graphics , using official @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Disease Control andand Folkhälsomyndigheten , the Public Health Agency of Sweden specifically to expose the political agenda of “ the public health disaster of Sweden ’ s no lockdown policy ” narrative .
The major disclaimer I have about the graphics I created is that the US lockdown response to covid19 that is hundreds to thousands times worse in result versus Sweden ’ s no lockdown , free and open society response is likely skewed a little higher than reality .
This bias originates from the inaccurate reporting of covid deaths in America @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , New York , Texas and Colorado , have admitted to many cases of falsely categorizing non-covid19 deaths , including even deaths from fatal transportation crashes and murders , as covid19 deaths .
However , it is not my fault that US health agencies have reported wildly inflated covid19 deaths that make their management of the virus appear pathetic in comparison to Sweden ’ s chosen strategies of continuing to operate their nation as if covid19 was less dangerous than the common flu for healthy , working-age people , which their statistics have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only other factor that introduces some slight margins of error in the above graphics is the fact that the data available for mortality rates among different demographics do not exactly match the population data also provided for these demographic groups to determine mortality rates .
Thus I was required to make some extrapolations with the data to determine mortality rates of covid19 for the Swedish age demographics .
For example , the population data I used for the Swedish population split the demographic data into age brackets of 45-55 , 55-65 , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the age brackets of 40-49 , 50-59 , 60-69 and so on provided by the Public Health Agency of Sweden for the number of deaths from covid19 .
Therefore to determine the mortality rates for covid19 and the common flu , I was required to extrapolate the population data for age categories to match the age categories for the data provided regarding number of deaths .
The methodology I used to estimate the Swedish population to arrive at mortality rates for each age group was a direct linear extrapolation .
For example , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of 35 and 44 , an age group of 10 years .
Consequently , to estimate how many citizens were among those aged 35 to 39 , I merely divided the number of the total citizens for that age group of 1.282M citizens in half to arrive at 641,000 citizens and then added this figure to the 4.448M Swedes that are 34 years of age or younger to arrive at a total population of 5.1M Swedes for the demographic of 0-39 years of age for my mortality rate calculations .
Of course , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more heavily skewed in favor of the 35 to 39 year old group than the 40 to 44 year old group , than my total population of 0-39 years of age will yield a slightly higher mortality rate than reality .
However , since all census data is based upon estimates from sampling a much smaller portion of the population , I assume that my own estimates of portions of the demographic categories to yield my mortality rates that were based on simple mathematical extrapolations should not introduce any significant margins of error @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reality contained within my two charts .
Despite this overwhelming scientific evidence of the Swedish approach as the most effective combined dual health and economic-based approach in the entire world , I was amazed at the volume of Western media lies and propaganda about Sweden ’ s approach being a horrific failure .
Western media in the US and the UK were all too eager to oblige in spreading complete lies and fabricated garbage by painting Sweden ’ s massive success as a complete failure by printing headlines that blared , “ Sweden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID-19-related deaths than its Nordic neighbors ” , “ Sweden ’ s coronavirus death rate is nearly 6 times that of neighboring Norway and Finland ” , “ A Very Swedish Sort of Failure ” , and “ Sweden ’ s Coronavirus Experiment Has Well and Truly Failed.
” And just in case you ’ re not the type to watch the nightly news , the Western media flooded the internet with the same false narrative to ensure that everyone that heard about these stories and consequently searched for additional stories about Sweden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ plenty of confirmation about these false narratives .
The mission of these fake , non-science and non-mathematical based stories was to ensure that the maximum amount of people around the world remain completely unthinking , obedient slaves to State mandated , martial-law style lockdowns and stay-at-home orders , in which the consequent social isolation from others would not only produce devastating financial and psychological effects but also have the added bonus , for the ruling class , of producing a mental state among the global population extremely receptive to hate and fear .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Google Search engine for “ the failure of Sweden ’ s coronavirus response ” , and Google , as an apparatus of the parasitic ruling class , returned 52M results for this topic .
And though a search for “ the success of Swedens ’ coronavirus response ” returned 63.9M results , and one may see the results and perhaps think that for the first time in history , the Google search engine did not have an agenda in its search results , a quick glance at the titles of the articles @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such faith .
The first articles for this search were titled , “ Has Sweden ’ s Controversial Covid19 Strategy Been Successful ?
” , “ Dramatic Drop in Deaths Doesn ’ t Mean Plan Worked ” , “ Misinformation and De-Contextualization ” , “ Sweden ’ s Prime Minister Rejects Criticism ” , and “ A Warning from Sweden ’ s Coronavirus Response ” .
Although a few of these articles appear that they may focus on the positive aspects of Sweden ’ s response , they did not .
Every single @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of their response , and completely ignored their much more heavily positive outcomes , whereby the results of this “ positive ” search were nearly indistinguishable from the results of the “ negative ” search about Sweden ’ s covid19 response .
In any event , the hypocritical Western media that blasted Sweden ’ s response as a complete failure for having six times the mortality rate of its neighbors in Finland and Norway , these faux journalists should have turned their propaganda lens inward to within domestic borders and blasted a covid19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ under 40 year old population that was more than 1,230 times that of Sweden .
If Sweden ’ s response was a disaster , how would you categorize a response that was worse by a factor of more than twelve-hundred times ?
A complete apocalypse ?
And why was this rate so much higher in the US than in Sweden ?
As I already stated , it was so much higher because nearly no one died in Sweden who was under the age of 60 from this virus , so printing a headline @ @ @ @ @ @ @ category were “ apocalyptic ” when compared to Sweden , though it would never happen in a million years , would still be a headline upon which I would heavily frown , as publishing such a headline would obviously only be done with the to deceive .
Even though the data of mortality rates for the under 40-year old category would qualify as a comparison of apples to apples , in some instances , comparing apples to apples does not mean that such a comparison would not be deceitful .
Quoting statistics should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their use will paint biased , misleading views of the actual situation , yet the mass media repeatedly engages in such deception with no qualms about doing so .
Likewise , the reason Sweden possessed a covid19 death rate six times higher than Finland and Norway was because ( 1 ) Sweden ’ s elderly population was much greater than the elderly population of either of those two nations ; and ( 2 ) As small as was Sweden ’ s mortality rates were for all age groups except the elderly , Finland @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even more minute .
Consequently , compare minute to minute statistics , a 6 times higher mortality rate is very easy to manufacture and can be extremely misleading .
For example if one country reports six deaths out of 100,000 and another country reports 36 deaths out of 100,000 and both nations have populations under 10 million people , reporting a mortality rate six times higher in the former nation versus the latter nation is truly misleading .
Now if both nations had populations over 150M people and this were still the case @ @ @ @ @ @ @ report such a statistic as there would be much more truth in such a stat .
As is evident in the bottom chart , the bulk of deaths from coronavirus in Sweden happened in the over 70 year old demographic , but particularly in the over 80 year old category .
If a nation has many more elderly citizens , percentage wise than another nation , then of course its overall mortality rate will be much higher , as its overall mortality rate will be greatly skewed by its large elderly population .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ science to extrapolate the high mortality rate of covid19 in Lombardy , a region with a high percentage of elderly , to the entire nation of Italy .
All of the Western media ’ s headlines about this particular set of data in Sweden in comparison to its neighboring nations was completely disingenuous and deliberately intended to mislead the American public about the “ failure ” of the Sweden no lockdown policy , that in reality , was among the most successful , if not the most successful , in the entire world @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Sweden to another Nation A in which only 5 % of Nation ’ s A population was over 70 years of age with 90 % of its population under 60 , and then published headlines , “ Sweden ’ s Covid19 Death Rate 3,000 Times Greater than Nation A ” , you would not be a journalist interested in spreading truth but a spineless coward whose printed propaganda would be directly responsible for the extension of lockdowns that would likely cause many unnecessary deaths .
In the end , I ’ m @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the complete garbage implications contained within some of the misleading headlines I ’ ve stated above that appeared in Western media about Sweden ’ s virus response “ failure ” with not even a single minute of consideration if the headlines were really true or not .
In Edward Bernay ’ s 1925 book , Crystallizing Public Opinion , the person whom many consider as the father of US propaganda , stated , “ People accept the facts which come to them through existing channels .
They like to hear new things in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time nor the inclination to search for facts that are not readily available to them .
“ The expert , therefore , must advise first upon the form of action desirable for his client and secondly must utilize the established mediums of communication , in order to present to the public a point of view .
“ This is true whether it is that of a majority or minority , old or new personality , institution or group which desires to change by modification or intensification the store of knowledge and the opinion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ propaganda , which certainly the propaganda about this virus used to justify State leader mandates to lockdown economies around the world fall under , convinces the victims of the propaganda that they came to the conclusions contained within the propaganda on their own merit , and that they were not ordered to embrace such false beliefs .
Bernays stated in 1925 that for propaganda to be effective , it has to fall under the category of information for which the public has “ neither the time nor the inclination to search for facts @ @ @ @ @ @ @ readily available.
” Quite sadly , this once staunch pillar of disseminating effective propaganda is not even necessary today given the century of brainwashing and dumbing down of society that has taken place since 1925 .
The data I complied above that would easily disprove all the lies in thousands of articles circulating around the world about the failure of Sweden ’ s no lockdown approach was readily available on the public website of Folkhälsomyndigheten , the Public Health Agency of Sweden .
But today , most people do not want to spend @ @ @ @ @ @ @ information as wrong or true when the information to do so is readily available .
Instead , society at large still prefers to have the parasitic ruling class think for them and tell them what to believe .
For this reason , I devoted an entire course in my skwealthacademy curriculum just to the development of critical think skills , and I will launch my course as soon as the parasitic world leaders life the global lockdown , of which I ’ ve been subjected for 134 days and counting , and allow @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , if you made it to the end of this article , you are not among that group , but that also makes you a rarity in today ’ s world .

In order to control public opinion of the masses, the ruling class should “regiment the public mind every bit as much as an army regiments [soldiers’] bodies.” – Edward Bernays, Propaganda (1928)
“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. (…)
“We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. (…)
“In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons…who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.” – Edward Bernays, Propaganda (1928)
Recently, the Western media has made a point to publish a plethora of stories about the public health disaster of Sweden’s no lockdown policy in order to deliberately discredit, in the minds of most people, the only science-based approach to covid19 undertaken by any nation in the world.
Since the end of July, there have been a lot of completely false and misleading stories about the failures of Sweden’s no lockdown policy and Sweden officials’ choices to not tyrannically shut down businesses in Sweden, to only suggest that the elderly vulnerable population self-quarantine, and to allow for the complete normalization of life under the conditions.
Of course, the criticisms of portraying life as completely normal in Sweden had some merit. The most normalized behavior occurred in Stockholm, and though no businesses were ordered to close, some more cautious, conservative business owners chose to shut down their cinemas and ski resorts chose to voluntarily close and GDP in Sweden is still forecast to shrink by 4%.
Still a 4% annual shrinkage in GDP is 1000 times more preferable to the annual pace of a 32.9% drop in GDP forecast in America just this past quarter.
Furthermore, if the most human interaction is happening in Stockholm, the most densely populated city in Sweden with a central population of 1.5M and a metropolitan population of over 2.4M, then this fact would serve as stronger proof, not weaker proof, that their no-lockdown, normal life behavior approach was a resounding success.
This logical, science-based and humanitarian approach starkly contrasted with the totalitarian, misanthropic ruling class’s approach to restrict the movements of everyone, including fully-abled healthy people with strong immune systems, and legislating mandated stay-at-home orders for large swaths of entire nations, orders which the United Nations claim may bring 260 million people to the verge of starvation by year’s end, which would make the State leaders responsible for an outcome, if it happens, guilty of genocide on a scale that would make Hitler, Mao, and Mussolini’s repugnant genocidal feats appear as child’s play.
In fact, in response to my legitimate claims that Sweden’s no-lockdown response was the only science-based response to covid 19 in the entire world, and also, non-coincidentally, the most successful response, I heard many Westerners attempt to rebut my arguments with counterclaims that were not the result of any research or intellect, but the consequence of obedient parroting of Western media headlines, that on the surface, seemed to dispute the science I had presented.
In response to Sweden’s massive success rates with its no lockdown policy, the only State that dared stand up to the global banking cartel that was likely behind the global economic lockdown policy, the Western mass media deployed a pre-emptive counterstrike by literally releasing hundreds of articles about the grave “failure” of Sweden’s no lockdown policy and disseminating these articles to millions of websites online.
So even though I debunked their false claims already in this article, since social media has reduced everyone’s attention span to small chunks of a few seconds at a time, with the exception of a handful for every million, I’ve created a couple of charts, drawing data from the sites of the US Centers for Disease Control and Folkhälsomyndigheten, the Public Health Agency of Sweden, to address this problem whereby the false Western mass media narrative about Sweden’s virus response will be destroyed in a glance.
In the top chart, when we compare the mortality rates of covid19 in Sweden v. the US, including all data until the end of July, the US’s mortality rate of covid 19 in the age group of less than 39 years of age was 0.58%, more than 1,230 times greater than the 0.00047% mortality rate of Sweden.
Furthermore, in the age demographics of 40-59 and 59-69, the death rate in the US from covid19 versus Sweden was respectively 215 times and 211 times greater than Sweden.
In the bottom chart, I compared Sweden’s mortality rate for different age demographics compared to the US mortality rate for the common flu. For the comprehensive age group of all ages less than 60 years of age, the Swedish mortality rate of covid19 is less than 1/3rd of the American mortality rate for the common flu.
Clearly, as can be easily observed in the bottom chart, the overall covid19 mortality rate for Sweden’s population was greatly skewed by nearly all covid19 deaths occurring in the above 70 year old demographic, with the majority of Sweden’s covid19 deaths occurring in those older than 80 and 90 years of age!
I created the above graphics, using official date of both the US Centers for Disease Control andand Folkhälsomyndigheten, the Public Health Agency of Sweden specifically to expose the political agenda of “the public health disaster of Sweden’s no lockdown policy” narrative.
The major disclaimer I have about the graphics I created is that the US lockdown response to covid19 that is hundreds to thousands times worse in result versus Sweden’s no lockdown, free and open society response is likely skewed a little higher than reality.
This bias originates from the inaccurate reporting of covid deaths in America, as already four states, Washington, New York, Texas and Colorado, have admitted to many cases of falsely categorizing non-covid19 deaths, including even deaths from fatal transportation crashes and murders, as covid19 deaths.
However, it is not my fault that US health agencies have reported wildly inflated covid19 deaths that make their management of the virus appear pathetic in comparison to Sweden’s chosen strategies of continuing to operate their nation as if covid19 was less dangerous than the common flu for healthy, working-age people, which their statistics have thus far validated.
Secondly, the only other factor that introduces some slight margins of error in the above graphics is the fact that the data available for mortality rates among different demographics do not exactly match the population data also provided for these demographic groups to determine mortality rates.
Thus I was required to make some extrapolations with the data to determine mortality rates of covid19 for the Swedish age demographics.
For example, the population data I used for the Swedish population split the demographic data into age brackets of 45-55, 55-65,and so on, that slightly differed from the age brackets of 40-49, 50-59, 60-69 and so on provided by the Public Health Agency of Sweden for the number of deaths from covid19.
Therefore to determine the mortality rates for covid19 and the common flu, I was required to extrapolate the population data for age categories to match the age categories for the data provided regarding number of deaths.
The methodology I used to estimate the Swedish population to arrive at mortality rates for each age group was a direct linear extrapolation.
For example, Sweden reported 1.282M citizens between the ages of 35 and 44, an age group of 10 years.
Consequently, to estimate how many citizens were among those aged 35 to 39, I merely divided the number of the total citizens for that age group of 1.282M citizens in half to arrive at 641,000 citizens and then added this figure to the 4.448M Swedes that are 34 years of age or younger to arrive at a total population of 5.1M Swedes for the demographic of 0-39 years of age for my mortality rate calculations.
Of course, if the number of 1.282M citizens is more heavily skewed in favor of the 35 to 39 year old group than the 40 to 44 year old group, than my total population of 0-39 years of age will yield a slightly higher mortality rate than reality.
However, since all census data is based upon estimates from sampling a much smaller portion of the population, I assume that my own estimates of portions of the demographic categories to yield my mortality rates that were based on simple mathematical extrapolations should not introduce any significant margins of error that will distort the true message and reality contained within my two charts.
Despite this overwhelming scientific evidence of the Swedish approach as the most effective combined dual health and economic-based approach in the entire world, I was amazed at the volume of Western media lies and propaganda about Sweden’s approach being a horrific failure.
Western media in the US and the UK were all too eager to oblige in spreading complete lies and fabricated garbage by painting Sweden’s massive success as a complete failure by printing headlines that blared, “Sweden has nearly 10 times the number of COVID-19-related deaths than its Nordic neighbors”, “Sweden’s coronavirus death rate is nearly 6 times that of neighboring Norway and Finland”, “A Very Swedish Sort of Failure”, and “Sweden’s Coronavirus Experiment Has Well and Truly Failed.”
And just in case you’re not the type to watch the nightly news, the Western media flooded the internet with the same false narrative to ensure that everyone that heard about these stories and consequently searched for additional stories about Sweden’s no lockdown policy would receive plenty of confirmation about these false narratives.
The mission of these fake, non-science and non-mathematical based stories was to ensure that the maximum amount of people around the world remain completely unthinking, obedient slaves to State mandated, martial-law style lockdowns and stay-at-home orders, in which the consequent social isolation from others would not only produce devastating financial and psychological effects but also have the added bonus, for the ruling class, of producing a mental state among the global population extremely receptive to hate and fear.
Yesterday, I conducted a search on the Google Search engine for “the failure of Sweden’s coronavirus response”, and Google, as an apparatus of the parasitic ruling class, returned 52M results for this topic.
And though a search for “the success of Swedens’ coronavirus response” returned 63.9M results, and one may see the results and perhaps think that for the first time in history, the Google search engine did not have an agenda in its search results, a quick glance at the titles of the articles on the entire first page quickly dispel such faith.
The first articles for this search were titled, “Has Sweden’s Controversial Covid19 Strategy Been Successful?”, “Dramatic Drop in Deaths Doesn’t Mean Plan Worked”, “Misinformation and De-Contextualization”, “Sweden’s Prime Minister Rejects Criticism”, and “A Warning from Sweden’s Coronavirus Response”.
Although a few of these articles appear that they may focus on the positive aspects of Sweden’s response, they did not.
Every single article focused on the slightly negative outcomes of their response, and completely ignored their much more heavily positive outcomes, whereby the results of this “positive” search were nearly indistinguishable from the results of the “negative” search about Sweden’s covid19 response.
In any event, the hypocritical Western media that blasted Sweden’s response as a complete failure for having six times the mortality rate of its neighbors in Finland and Norway, these faux journalists should have turned their propaganda lens inward to within domestic borders and blasted a covid19 death rate in the US in the under 40 year old population that was more than 1,230 times that of Sweden.
If Sweden’s response was a disaster, how would you categorize a response that was worse by a factor of more than twelve-hundred times? A complete apocalypse? And why was this rate so much higher in the US than in Sweden?
As I already stated, it was so much higher because nearly no one died in Sweden who was under the age of 60 from this virus, so printing a headline that US deaths in the under 40 category were “apocalyptic” when compared to Sweden, though it would never happen in a million years, would still be a headline upon which I would heavily frown, as publishing such a headline would obviously only be done with the to deceive.
Even though the data of mortality rates for the under 40-year old category would qualify as a comparison of apples to apples, in some instances, comparing apples to apples does not mean that such a comparison would not be deceitful.
Quoting statistics should not be used when one knows that their use will paint biased, misleading views of the actual situation, yet the mass media repeatedly engages in such deception with no qualms about doing so.
Likewise, the reason Sweden possessed a covid19 death rate six times higher than Finland and Norway was because
(1) Sweden’s elderly population was much greater than the elderly population of either of those two nations; and
(2) As small as was Sweden’s mortality rates were for all age groups except the elderly, Finland and Norway’s mortality rates were even more minute. Consequently, compare minute to minute statistics, a 6 times higher mortality rate is very easy to manufacture and can be extremely misleading.
For example if one country reports six deaths out of 100,000 and another country reports 36 deaths out of 100,000 and both nations have populations under 10 million people, reporting a mortality rate six times higher in the former nation versus the latter nation is truly misleading.
Now if both nations had populations over 150M people and this were still the case, then it would be okay to report such a statistic as there would be much more truth in such a stat.
As is evident in the bottom chart, the bulk of deaths from coronavirus in Sweden happened in the over 70 year old demographic, but particularly in the over 80 year old category.
If a nation has many more elderly citizens, percentage wise than another nation, then of course its overall mortality rate will be much higher, as its overall mortality rate will be greatly skewed by its large elderly population.
This is why it would be fake science to extrapolate the high mortality rate of covid19 in Lombardy, a region with a high percentage of elderly, to the entire nation of Italy.
All of the Western media’s headlines about this particular set of data in Sweden in comparison to its neighboring nations was completely disingenuous and deliberately intended to mislead the American public about the “failure” of the Sweden no lockdown policy, that in reality, was among the most successful, if not the most successful, in the entire world.
If you compared the mortality rate of Sweden to another Nation A in which only 5% of Nation’s A population was over 70 years of age with 90% of its population under 60, and then published headlines, “Sweden’s Covid19 Death Rate 3,000 Times Greater than Nation A”, you would not be a journalist interested in spreading truth but a spineless coward whose printed propaganda would be directly responsible for the extension of lockdowns that would likely cause many unnecessary deaths.
In the end, I’m astonished at how many people readily parrot the complete garbage implications contained within some of the misleading headlines I’ve stated above that appeared in Western media about Sweden’s virus response “failure” with not even a single minute of consideration if the headlines were really true or not.
In Edward Bernay’s 1925 book, Crystallizing Public Opinion, the person whom many consider as the father of US propaganda, stated,
“People accept the facts which come to them through existing channels. They like to hear new things in accustomed ways. They have neither the time nor the inclination to search for facts that are not readily available to them.
“The expert, therefore, must advise first upon the form of action desirable for his client and secondly must utilize the established mediums of communication, in order to present to the public a point of view.
“This is true whether it is that of a majority or minority, old or new personality, institution or group which desires to change by modification or intensification the store of knowledge and the opinion of the public.”
The most effective propaganda, which certainly the propaganda about this virus used to justify State leader mandates to lockdown economies around the world fall under, convinces the victims of the propaganda that they came to the conclusions contained within the propaganda on their own merit, and that they were not ordered to embrace such false beliefs.
Bernays stated in 1925 that for propaganda to be effective, it has to fall under the category of information for which the public has “neither the time nor the inclination to search for facts” because the facts “are not readily available.”
Quite sadly, this once staunch pillar of disseminating effective propaganda is not even necessary today given the century of brainwashing and dumbing down of society that has taken place since 1925.
The data I complied above that would easily disprove all the lies in thousands of articles circulating around the world about the failure of Sweden’s no lockdown approach was readily available on the public website of Folkhälsomyndigheten, the Public Health Agency of Sweden.
But today, most people do not want to spend even two minutes of time to vet information as wrong or true when the information to do so is readily available.
Instead, society at large still prefers to have the parasitic ruling class think for them and tell them what to believe.
For this reason, I devoted an entire course in my skwealthacademy curriculum just to the development of critical think skills, and I will launch my course as soon as the parasitic world leaders life the global lockdown, of which I’ve been subjected for 134 days and counting, and allow me to return home.
Of course, if you made it to the end of this article, you are not among that group, but that also makes you a rarity in today’s world.
Source: Maalamalama.com


humansarefree--2020-08-06--Newt Gingrich Says Democrats Are ‘Owned By People Who Are Financed By George Soros’

Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich warned Wednesday that America is not facing a normal election this November because the Democratic Party is “ owned by the left ” and by “ people who are financed by George Soros.
” “ All of these Democrats are now basically owned by the left .
They are not going to pick any fights .
They are owned by people who are financed by George Soros , ” Gingrich said during an interview with Fox & Friends .
Gingrich added that the political division in America represents “ a war between two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s not a normal presidential election.
” The former speaker noted that local leaders and district attorneys in Democrat-controlled cities including Minneapolis , Portland , Seattle and Chicago are financed by George Soros ’ Open Society , and have “ surrendered to criminals ” and embraced “ pro-criminal ” policies that have led to chaos in those cities .
“ In fact , they just put out a pamphlet for citizens on how to be mugged without endangering yourself because they don ’ t have a police force that can achieve anything @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Minneapolis .
“ We are back to the late 1960s in terms of the rising murder rates and rising crime rates , ” Gingrich urged .
“ The propaganda machine of the left , which used to be the news media , is going to do everything it can to hide from it , but I think the average American is beginning to realize this stuff is dangerous , ” Gingrich said , adding “ That ’ s why by three to one they don ’ t want to defund the police .
@

Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich warned Wednesday that America is not facing a normal election this November because the Democratic Party is “owned by the left” and by “people who are financed by George Soros.”
by Steve Watson
“All of these Democrats are now basically owned by the left. They are not going to pick any fights. They are owned by people who are financed by George Soros,” Gingrich said during an interview with Fox & Friends.
Gingrich added that the political division in America represents “a war between two worlds,” adding that “It’s not a normal presidential election.”
The former speaker noted that local leaders and district attorneys in Democrat-controlled cities including Minneapolis, Portland, Seattle and Chicago are financed by George Soros’ Open Society, and have “surrendered to criminals” and embraced “pro-criminal” policies that have led to chaos in those cities.
“In fact, they just put out a pamphlet for citizens on how to be mugged without endangering yourself because they don’t have a police force that can achieve anything anymore.” Gingrich said, referring to Minneapolis.
“We are back to the late 1960s in terms of the rising murder rates and rising crime rates,” Gingrich urged.
“The propaganda machine of the left, which used to be the news media, is going to do everything it can to hide from it, but I think the average American is beginning to realize this stuff is dangerous,” Gingrich said, adding “That’s why by three to one they don’t want to defund the police.”


humansarefree--2020-08-06--Neverending Fraud Cases: Texas Also Caught Lying About Coronavirus Deaths

An “ automated error ” supposedly led the state of Texas to massively over-inflate its Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) death count , according to new reports .
The Texas Department of State Health Services ( DSHS ) now admits that hundreds of deaths it attributed to the Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) were actually not linked to the virus at all .
This is a similar scenario to what recently happened in Florida after it was discovered that testing facilities all across the state had been churning out false positives .
“ DSHS corrects COVID-19 fatality counts for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Texas agency announced in a tweet .
“ An automation error caused 225 fatalities to be included even though COVID-19 was not listed as a direct cause of death on the death certificate.
” In what appears to be a common “ abnormality ” all across the country , DSHS has been relying upon false death certificate data to count alleged Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) fatalities in the Lone Star State .
Many of these deaths involved people who died with the Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) , as opposed to from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ using death certificate data to count fatalities this week , an automation error caused approximately 225 fatalities to be included that did not have COVID-19 listed as a direct cause of death , ” the agency indicated .
“ A manual quality check revealed the issue late Wednesday.
” Your chances of dying from coronavirus are literally one in a million ; and you ’ re up to 10 times more likely to die from normal flu In lieu of an available Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) vaccine at this time , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get flu shots this year .
According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ’ s ( CDC ) Robert Redfield , this will help to ensure that the health system does not become overburdened .
“ If there is COVID-19 and flu activity at the same time , this could place a tremendous burden on the health care system related to bed occupancy , laboratory testing needs , personal protective equipment and health care worker safety , ” Redfield stated during a recent testimony before the House Select Subcommittee .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ reopen , having stated during a recent Buck Institute Webinar that the risk of young children contracting the Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) is exceptionally low .
More children are likely to die from suicide or drug overdose from having to stay home , he says , which is why it remains critical from a public health perspective to open things back up and let people live their normal lives .
“ It ’ s not risk of school openings versus public health , ” he is quoted as saying .
“ It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” “ When we look at , right now , the mortality of this particular COVID virus , in the first almost 218,000 people we looked at February to July , there was 52 individuals under the age of 18 .
And if I recollect , about 35 were actually school age .
“ Some of them were younger than school age .
We ’ re looking critically at those individuals .
And , you know , clearly , there ’ s an increase in comorbidities related to significant medical conditions.
” Another @ @ @ @ @ @ @ unlikely to hear much about from the mainstream media is the fact that one ’ s chances of dying from the Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) are about one in a million .
You are up to 10 times more likely to “ catch ” seasonal influenza and die from it than you are from catching the Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) and dying from it , which puts the whole thing into perspective .
“ Now , I ’ m not trying to belittle that , ” Redfield further explained .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sure we look at it proportional .
”

An “automated error” supposedly led the state of Texas to massively over-inflate its Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) death count, according to new reports.
by Ethan Huff
The Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) now admits that hundreds of deaths it attributed to the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) were actually not linked to the virus at all.
This is a similar scenario to what recently happened in Florida after it was discovered that testing facilities all across the state had been churning out false positives.
“DSHS corrects COVID-19 fatality counts for the week of July 27,” the Texas agency announced in a tweet.
“An automation error caused 225 fatalities to be included even though COVID-19 was not listed as a direct cause of death on the death certificate.”
In what appears to be a common “abnormality” all across the country, DSHS has been relying upon false death certificate data to count alleged Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) fatalities in the Lone Star State.
Many of these deaths involved people who died with the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19), as opposed to from it.
“As DSHS shifted to using death certificate data to count fatalities this week, an automation error caused approximately 225 fatalities to be included that did not have COVID-19 listed as a direct cause of death,” the agency indicated. “A manual quality check revealed the issue late Wednesday.”
Your chances of dying from coronavirus are literally one in a million; and you’re up to 10 times more likely to die from normal flu
In lieu of an available Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) jjab at this time, the federal government is urging all Americans to get flu shots this year.
According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Robert Redfield, this will help to ensure that the health system does not become overburdened.
“If there is COVID-19 and flu activity at the same time, this could place a tremendous burden on the health care system related to bed occupancy, laboratory testing needs, personal protective equipment and health care worker safety,” Redfield stated during a recent testimony before the House Select Subcommittee.
Redfield is also urging public schools to reopen, having stated during a recent Buck Institute Webinar that the risk of young children contracting the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) is exceptionally low.
More children are likely to die from suicide or drug overdose from having to stay home, he says, which is why it remains critical from a public health perspective to open things back up and let people live their normal lives.
“It’s not risk of school openings versus public health,” he is quoted as saying. “It’s public health versus public health.”
“When we look at, right now, the mortality of this particular COVID virus, in the first almost 218,000 people we looked at February to July, there was 52 individuals under the age of 18. And if I recollect, about 35 were actually school age.
“Some of them were younger than school age. We’re looking critically at those individuals. And, you know, clearly, there’s an increase in comorbidities related to significant medical conditions.”
Another thing Redfield brought up that you are unlikely to hear much about from the mainstream media is the fact that one’s chances of dying from the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) are about one in a million.
You are up to 10 times more likely to “catch” seasonal influenza and die from it than you are from catching the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) and dying from it, which puts the whole thing into perspective.
“Now, I’m not trying to belittle that,” Redfield further explained. “I’m just trying to make sure we look at it proportional.”


humansarefree--2020-08-07--YouTube / Google Whistleblower Reveals A Dangerous Agenda

A former insider who worked at YouTube / Google , Zach Vorhies shares his story about what he uncovered while @ @ @ @ @ .
Zach Vorhies became a whistleblower after he discovered what he believed to be high @ @ @ @ @ entire nations , including the United States .
Google sent the police after Zach when @ @ @ @ @ over 950 pages of documents from the company which he handed over to the Department @ @ @ @ @ also shares a plan to end the censorship and possibly break up the monopoly that @ @ @ @ @ powerful corporation in the world , Google .

A former insider who worked at YouTube / Google, Zach Vorhies shares his story about what he uncovered while working for the tech giant.
Zach Vorhies became a whistleblower after he discovered what he believed to be high crimes committed by Google against entire nations, including the United States.
Google sent the police after Zach when they discovered he had taken over 950 pages of documents from the company which he handed over to the Department of Justice.
Mr. Zorhies also shares a plan to end the censorship and possibly break up the monopoly that has become possibly the most powerful corporation in the world, Google.
Source: YouTube.com


humansarefree--2020-08-07--Natural Cures for COVID Being Censored as BILLIONS of Dollars are Spent on Vaccines and Drugs

In the media coverage surrounding COVID-19 , why are we hearing nothing about what each individual can do FOR THEMSELVES nutritionally in an effort to build their immune competency to resist and overcome infection ?
Why is the narrative all about how the pharmaceutical industry is going to “ SAVE ” us ?
Could it have something to do with the fact that the pharma-controlled media wants to convince us that we must spend billions of dollars and wait for big pharma to come to the rescue with new , expensive , proprietary and patented anti-viral drugs and a magical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ allowing ” us to return to normal life ?
I ’ m not even saying that it ’ s only nutritional options and natural alternatives that are being shunned .
Even inexpensive , easy to access drugs like Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin with zinc are being played down , despite studies from around the world showing it ’ s efficacy .
And , with a history of use for over 60 years in millions of people , it has proven to have an excellent safety record as compared to many other pharmaceutical drugs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ $ 30 compared to Remdesivir , which costs more than $ 3,000 .
You can be sure that the antiviral drugs being developed for COVID-19 will probably exceed that cost .
Let ’ s be honest ; inexpensive , safe drugs or natural alternatives like herbal or nutritional compounds won ’ t provide pharma with the big payday they are banking on from COVID-19 .
They are opportunists , and you can bet they are going to make the most out of this opportunity .
No investment and all profit served up in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ think of a better business model … ?
Opportunistic organisms in biology are those parasites , bacteria , fungi , yeasts and viruses that take advantage of a weak host that offers them a ripe terrain for infection .
These pharma opportunists are getting our government to fund the development and production of these drugs and vaccines to the tune of billions of dollars… AND they will potentially reap hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue from the sales ( all underwritten by each of us taxpayers ) .
No investment and all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ environment !
Can you think of a better business model and financial windfall scenario for them ?
In the meantime , as the powers that be , drag their feet on making these inexpensive treatments available to sick patients because they have something better on the horizon , thousands of people are dying .
Many unnecessarily .
And , since scientists have already said that the virus can and will mutate , the magical vaccine that we have all paid for and millions are relying on , will most likely be largely ineffective @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in a worst-case scenario .
Another legitimate concern would be the vaccine ’ s role in the development of future long-term chronic disease .
A similar situation plays out every year with the flu vaccine and its miserable rate of effectiveness , because guessing which strains will be prevalent the next season to incorporate into the vaccine is a roll of the dice .
Three decades of attempts to make a coronavirus vaccine have been a miserable failure , resulting in what is called “ pathogenic priming ” or sometimes referred to as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a paradoxical response .
This is where a vaccinated person , after later being exposed to the same virus has the risk of acquiring an extremely exaggerated immune reaction .
This is something many top scientists and doctors in the vaccine field are warning against .
It is not a great scenario when they are bragging about how fast they can get these vaccines to market and taking shortcuts in the safety studies like animal safety studies , followed by long-term human trials to make it happen .
Quick to market with a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Jackpot !
… oxidative radicals wreak havoc on the body if glutathione is in short supply .
There are thousands of studies published that demonstrate effectiveness of various natural compounds in preventing and treating viral infections .
They do that in numerous ways , but the two overarching strategies is first to prime or boost the body ’ s own ability to attack and destroy the pathological microbes and second , to block key biochemical pathways that the virus needs to enter the cell and proliferate .
In COVID-19 ’ s case @ @ @ @ @ @ @ called the ACE-2 receptors .
The cells lining the lungs and airways are particularly rich in these receptors making the lungs a receptive target for COVID-19 .
Nutritional compounds can also effectively manage the high levels of inflammation and collateral damage caused by the infection , which is one of the main reasons the COVID-19 infection can reach catastrophic levels and , in some cases becomes fatal .
Many reports have discussed a phenomenon that can occur called a “ cytokine storm ” , which is an example of an out of control @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The oxidative stress from this reaction causes massive collateral tissue damage .
Incidentally , the cytokine storm phenomenon is not new or unique to COVID-19 .
The literature is replete with studies discussing it in relationship to severe influenza as well .
One example of a nutritional superhero is glutathione .
Glutathione the body ’ s “ Master Antioxidant ” , is essential for successfully fighting infection and mitigating the damaging effects of the production of oxidative free radicals that are released during infection .
These oxidative radicals wreak havoc on the body @ @ @ @ @ @ @ These oxidative free-radicals are now implicated in the cause of the cytokine storm that often results in the loss of life from COVID-19 .
Fortunately , there are ways that you can boost your own glutathione levels .
Therefore , reducing inflammation and oxidative stress naturally not only decreases the severity of the infection and risk of death , but also the long-term health altering after-effects post infection .
N-Acetyl-Cysteine or N.A.C.
, is another important and related compound .
Studies have also shown that taking N.A.C .
will not only help boost @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prevent the formation of what is called von Willebrand Factor , an agent that is responsible for the blood clotting problems that frequently develops in COVID-19 patients .
The incredible partnership between the miraculous human immune system and nature The biochemistry of how the intelligence of the body operates is truly remarkable .
And the immune system is a symphony of players that when all working properly and in concert , make beautiful music together .
Beautiful unless you are a pathogen .
When working in harmony , the different players in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be reckoned with .
They seek , identify and destroy the intruder .
Rather than using a drug that often has risks of side effects to “ kill ” the infection , this approach fortifies and builds the body ’ s own defenses and mechanisms to fight the offending microbe and then clean up the mess and debris afterwards .
This includes upregulating white blood cells and immune regulatory players like macrophages , natural killer cells ( NK cells ) , neutrophils and monocytes .
As an example , vitamin C greatly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ macrophages , NK cells , neutrophils and monocytes .
Human beings can ’ t make our own , so we have to get it from diet and supplementation .
Vitamin C demands increase substantially during times of stress , injury and infection .
Therefore , it is essential to meet those demands with increased consumption when you want your immune system to work at its best .
Another example of key players during infection are cytokines .
Cytokines are proteins that act as cell signaling agents .
Some cytokines are pro-inflammatory , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pro-inflammatory response is necessary and appropriate during infection , but it needs to be kept in check to prevent raging inflammation or even an autoimmune shift causing the immune system to attack the body ’ s own tissues .
Various natural compounds are shown to regulate these processes and keep them in balance , preventing damaging downstream effects .
Those compounds include fish oil , curcumin ( the active ingredient in turmeric ) , vitamin D , resveratrol and quercetin among others .
Dr. Palmer ’ s free eBook 1200 Studies – Truth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , includes over 1400 published studies – authored by thousands of scientists and researchers – that contradict what officials are telling the public about vaccine safety and efficacy .

by Arjun Walia (excerpt)
A letter to the editor published in the New England Journal of Medicine titled “Open Schools, Covid-19, and Child and Teacher Morbidity in Sweden” has found that:
“Despite Sweden’s having kept schools and preschools open, we found a low incidence of severe Covid-19 among schoolchildren and children of preschool age during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic… No child with Covid-19 died… Among the 1,951,905 million children who were 1 to 16 years of age, 15 children had Covid-19, MIS-C, or both conditions and were admitted to an ICU, which is equal to 1 child in 130,000.”
It was published by Jonas F Ludvigsson a paediatrician at Örebro University Hospital and professor of clinical epidemiology at the Karolinska Institute.
The study also showed that “fewer than 10 preschool teachers and 20 schoolteachers in Sweden received intensive care for Covid-19 up until June 30, 2020 (20 per 103,596 school teachers, which is equal to 19 per 100,000).
As compared with other occupations (excluding health care workers), this corresponded to sex- and age-adjusted relative risks of 1.10 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 2.49) among preschool teachers and 0.43 (95% CI, 0.28 to 0.68) among schoolteachers.
In a Karolinska Institute press release, Ludvigsson indicated he was hopeful about the results.
“It is very gratifying that serious COVID-19, defined here as needing treatment in an intensive care unit, is so rare among children despite schools being open during the pandemic,” he said.
“The next step will be to follow up the children who were treated in an intensive care unit for COVID-19 to see if they have recovered fully. My gut feeling is that children who have been seriously ill because of MIS-C seem to recover fully eventually.”
After he published this piece, an article published in the British Medical Journal on the 18th of February by Ingrid Torjesen states the following:
The Swedish government has said that it will strengthen laws on academic freedom after a leading Swedish academic announced that he was quitting his work on covid-19 because of an onslaught of intimidating comments from people who disagreed or disliked his research findings….
After the letter’s publication he was bombarded with angry messages through social media and email criticising the study and inferring that it and Ludvigsson were representative of the country’s covid-19 containment strategy.
The experience has taken its toll on Ludvigsson. He told the journal of the Swedish Medical Association (Lakartidningen) that for a week he woke up at 3 am every night and could not get back to sleep and that he had now lost his appetite for covid-19—both when it comes to speaking out and researching. He has decided to quit researching and debating covid-19.
He is trying to put the experience behind him and has said that he will not talk to the media about what happened. However, he told The BMJ that, although the findings were published in a research letter, this was “an actual study” that underwent formal external peer review, including statistical peer review, and the manuscript was revised four times before it was published.
Intimidation and threats against academics have risen with the growth of social media, and uncertainties and diverse opinions about covid-19 have added to the situation. In response, Sweden is planning to provide increased support for academic freedom through an amendment to its Higher Education Act.
Matilda Ernkrans, Sweden’s minister for higher education and research, told The BMJ:
“It is deeply concerning when academics are threatened to the extent that they don’t have the courage to keep on doing their job.
“This is not a new phenomenon, but we have seen an increase of threats against academics related to research on the coronavirus. When people are silenced, it’s a threat against the freedom of speech and our democracy.
“To strengthen academic freedom, the Swedish government has proposed a new amendment that points out that education and research must be protected to enable people to freely discover, research, and share knowledge.”
Ole Petter Ottersen, president of the Karolinska Institute, told The BMJ that he found the increase in threats and harassment towards researchers very worrying.
“A tough debate and a diversity of opinions based on facts and evidence are necessary elements of science and public discourse, but hateful and scornful accusations and personal attacks cannot be tolerated.
“We already see that researchers retreat from the public debate after being threatened or harassed, and in my own institution a leading researcher just decided to give up his covid-19 research for the same reason,” he added, referring to Ludvigsson.
Given that the Karolinska Institute seems to be the focus here as well, I thought I’d mention that professor Anna-Mia Elkström, an epidemiologist from the Institute and professor Stefan Swartling Peterson, have gone through the data from UNICEF and UNAIDS, and come to the conclusion that least as many people have died as a result of the restrictions to fight COVID as have died of COVID directly.