humansarefree--2020-10-13--AIER: Lockdowns Have Killed What’s Left of the United Nations’ Credibility

Distrust of the United Nations is a feeling that transcends political ideologies .
Even many who view the UN as an essential institution gripe about the composition of its councils and its mounting listlessness over the last few decades .
From charges of appeasement to accusations of moral relativism and beyond , the UN is regularly decried as an ineffectual circus of multinational bureaucrats , purposely or unwittingly promoting the interests of a global elite and undermining the sovereignty of nations .
Conspiracy theorists , rarely inclined to subtlety , see it as a Trojan horse for a New World @ @ @ @ @ @ @ supranational world government .
Nevertheless , many of those complaints ( and some of those suspicions , at least circumstantially ) are justified .
Despite its foundational goal of “ maintain [ ing ] international peace and security ” the U.N. has clung to an increasingly desultory role since its formation after World War II , adding mostly ineffective missions along the way .
Although the monitoring of human rights has been a part of the U.S. mission since its founding , the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was drawn up in 1948 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up steam .
With the adoption of the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action at the World Conference on Human Rights in 1993 , that focus was formalized and infrastructure ( a High Commissioner , with an office and staff ) added .
Yet the U.N. has never failed to the extent that it has throughout 2020 .
This year , the United Nations has effectively stood as a bystander and partial accomplice amid the most widespread violations of human rights at any time in its seven-decade history .
Proponents of the UN @ @ @ @ @ @ @ smaller regional conflicts , which prevailed between its 1945 founding and the early 1990s .
Yet the ineffectiveness of the UN seems to have increased since the end of the Cold War , strongly suggesting that the ( again , relative ) interim calm has more to do with a clearly demarcated , two-power world than anything the UN can lay claim to .
Since the collapse of the Soviet Union and the Eastern Bloc , the organization has proven unable to stop bloody conflicts in Syria , Myanmar , Yemen , Libya @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a few , while mounting ineffective responses to atrocities in Somalia , Rwanda , Bosnia , and elsewhere .
The U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 was called “ illegal ” by the UN , bringing to mind an old Robin Williams bit .
And where peacekeeping missions have been effective , they tend to develop the character of foreign policy ‘ heirlooms : ’ the average age of the 14 active United Nations missions is 26 years .
Accounts of abuse and corruption have further tarnished its idealistic facade , as have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ York City , where the UN Headquarters occupies 18 acres of priceless Manhattan real estate .
Incompetence and retaliatory policies are part of the mix as well .
There are plenty of reasons not to take the United Nations seriously .
But those should be set aside for the most recent abdication of its charter .
It claims to “ protect human rights through legal instruments and on-the-ground activities ; ” the latter permitting U.N. officials to “ examine , monitor , publicly-report , and advise on human rights from a thematic or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ handful of vacuous comments , the United Nations has stayed virtually silent during global lockdowns by its member states .
Looking the Other Way In 1984 , the Forty-first session of the Commission on Human Rights met at a high-level conference in Siracusa , Italy .
The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the situations under which the observation of human rights by governments can be either reduced or suspended as contemplated by “ professors , practitioners , and other experts in human rights from all regions of the world.
” The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ The Siracusa Principles on the Limitation and Derogation Provisions in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights , ” and can be found here .
[ a ] group of 31 distinguished experts in international law … from Brazil , Canada , Chile , Egypt , France , Greece , Hungary , India , Ireland , Kuwait , the Netherlands , Norway , Poland , Switzerland , Turkey , the United Kingdom , the United States of America , the United Nations Center for Human Rights , the International Labor Organization @ @ @ @ @ @ @ … upon the need for a close examination of the conditions and groups for permissible limitations and derogations [ of civil and political rights ] .
UN guidelines stipulate that in the event that the integrity of a member state is threatened , meaning if a disease outbreak or other health emergency arises that poses the risk of state collapse , the suspension of certain human rights can be limited or removed , temporarily .
Any such moratorium is , per the Siracusa Principles , proscribed in the following ways : • It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ • It must exist for a finite , predetermined amount of time ; • It must be proportional to the effort ; • It must be subject to review ; Let ’ s set aside that a group of international attorneys drew up guidelines for when human rights can be suspended in the interest of preserving governments – which in terms of U.N. membership runs from democratically-elected officials to totalitarian regimes .
During the novel coronavirus pandemic of 2020 , other than a handful of mealy-mouthed , sanctimonious press releases and speeches , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – not even deploying their classically impotent , symbolic measures .
There were no legal actions , no threats of sanction , no requests for additional information , and no deployment of observation teams .
Open-ended lockdowns , threats against civilians , and a wide range of other human rights violations were undertaken the world over .
Many endure to this day , all but neglected by the appointed global watchdog for “ peace ” and “ dignity.
” Comments from the Office of the Secretary General ( SecGen ) of the UN @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as brutal policy responses to the pandemic drew on from weeks to months : • On Feb 28 , 2020 , the SecGen said in a press conference : “ Now is the time for all governments to step up and do everything possible to contain the disease – and to do so without stigmatization , and respecting human rights .
We know containment is possible , but the window of opportunity is narrowing.
” • One week later on March 6 , 2020 , a spokesperson for the Rights Chief at the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that “ people who are already barely surviving economically , may all too easily be pushed over the edge by the measures being adopted to contain the virus.
” By April 2020 , roughly half of Earth ’ s population – 3.9billion people in no less than 90 countries or territories – were ordered to stay at home .
• On April 20 , 2020 , World Health Organization ( WHO ) Director-General Tedros urged caution in lifting lockdowns : “ So-called lockdowns can help to take the heat out of a country @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not do it alone , ” adding that other methods including test and trace should be initiated as well .
( The WHO is the directing and coordinating authority for health matters within the United Nations system . )
• On April 27 , 2020 – well over a month after many of the lockdowns went into effect – came a statement from the UN Human Rights Office : Countries must “ not use the COVID crisis as a pretext for repressive measures [ . ]
” • On May 14 , 2020 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ urged governments to be cautious when lifting lockdowns , adding that allowing “ politics or economics ” to drive decisions is unwise .
Unsurprisingly , in mid-July UNICEF announced that the food security of some 132 million people could be in jeopardy by the end of 2020 .
And on it went , until on September 24th the SecGen blamed the failure to control the virus on a “ lack of global preparedness , cooperation , unity , and solidarity.
” And less than a week later with no shame or irony , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he economic and social consequences [ of the pandemic ] are as bad as we feared , and in some cases , worse.
” It ’ s not news that for the United Nations , economics are a distant consideration of any discussion , not least of which is human rights .
But in light of this year ’ s colossal failings , the time is right for an U.N.-free world ; at the very least , a U.S.-free U.N .
Enough Is Enough Defenders of the United Nations have a number of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ array of criticisms .
They argue that in a world where so much instability is created by nonstate entities – terror networks , for example – the impactfulness of a multi-state organization is blunted .
Those excuses don ’ t apply here : this wasn ’ t a global terror group or a regional threat .
The political response to the pandemic took the wholly undisguised form of governments threatening , imprisoning , and in some cases attacking their own citizens .
If , as politicians are fond of saying , the battle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a “ war , ” UN member firms have been engaged in war crimes on a scale not seen since World War II .
Now : no one would ( or should ) make the argument that the scope of death camps , forced labor , and summary executions in the first half of the 1940s matches that of tyrannical , widespread disease mitigation policies .
Yet the depraved indifference with which the global scale of lockdowns , and in particular the wholesale economic destruction of communities has been received by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the likelihood of widespread hunger and such inevitable costs as worldwide increases in stress disorders , spikes in suicides , and widespread substance abuse and the comparison becomes even more reasonable .
Of the U.N. ’ s “ myriad failings and… glaring inadequacies ” – and whether explained by cowardice , corruption , or indecision – the failure to speak clearly in favor of human rights ( with science and history squarely on the side of standing up for human rights ) is low from which the United Nations should not be permitted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , not in its present or any other form .
It ’ s bad enough that the United States government has a history of supporting brutal regimes with taxpayer dollars .
American taxpayers financing an estimated 22 % of the U.N. operating budget and just south of 30 % of the so-called peacekeeping budget for an organization that won ’ t stand up for our human rights , let alone that of billions of others , has never more clearly been indefensible .

Distrust of the United Nations is a feeling that transcends political ideologies. Even many who view the UN as an essential institution gripe about the composition of its councils and its mounting listlessness over the last few decades.
From charges of appeasement to accusations of moral relativism and beyond, the UN is regularly decried as an ineffectual circus of multinational bureaucrats, purposely or unwittingly promoting the interests of a global elite and undermining the sovereignty of nations.
Conspiracy theorists, rarely inclined to subtlety, see it as a Trojan horse for a New World Order, paving the way for a supranational world government.
Nevertheless, many of those complaints (and some of those suspicions, at least circumstantially) are justified. Despite its foundational goal of “maintain[ing] international peace and security” the U.N. has clung to an increasingly desultory role since its formation after World War II, adding mostly ineffective missions along the way.
Although the monitoring of human rights has been a part of the U.S. mission since its founding, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was drawn up in 1948; during the 1980s it began picking up steam.
With the adoption of the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action at the World Conference on Human Rights in 1993, that focus was formalized and infrastructure (a High Commissioner, with an office and staff) added.
Yet the U.N. has never failed to the extent that it has throughout 2020.
This year, the United Nations has effectively stood as a bystander and partial accomplice amid the most widespread violations of human rights at any time in its seven-decade history.
A Pantheon of Dysfunction
Proponents of the UN often cite the relative stability, despite smaller regional conflicts, which prevailed between its 1945 founding and the early 1990s.
Yet the ineffectiveness of the UN seems to have increased since the end of the Cold War, strongly suggesting that the (again, relative) interim calm has more to do with a clearly demarcated, two-power world than anything the UN can lay claim to.
Since the collapse of the Soviet Union and the Eastern Bloc, the organization has proven unable to stop bloody conflicts in Syria, Myanmar, Yemen, Libya, and Eastern Ukraine, to name a few, while mounting ineffective responses to atrocities in Somalia, Rwanda, Bosnia, and elsewhere.
The U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 was called “illegal” by the UN, bringing to mind an old Robin Williams bit. And where peacekeeping missions have been effective, they tend to develop the character of foreign policy ‘heirlooms:’ the average age of the 14 active United Nations missions is 26 years.
Accounts of abuse and corruption have further tarnished its idealistic facade, as have legendary stories of diplomatic abuse in New York City, where the UN Headquarters occupies 18 acres of priceless Manhattan real estate. Incompetence and retaliatory policies are part of the mix as well.
There are plenty of reasons not to take the United Nations seriously. But those should be set aside for the most recent abdication of its charter. It claims to “protect human rights through legal instruments and on-the-ground activities;” the latter permitting U.N. officials to “examine, monitor, publicly-report, and advise on human rights from a thematic or country-specific perspective.”
And yet despite a handful of vacuous comments, the United Nations has stayed virtually silent during global lockdowns by its member states.
Looking the Other Way
In 1984, the Forty-first session of the Commission on Human Rights met at a high-level conference in Siracusa, Italy. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the situations under which the observation of human rights by governments can be either reduced or suspended as contemplated by “professors, practitioners, and other experts in human rights from all regions of the world.”
The official deliverable of that meeting is entitled “The Siracusa Principles on the Limitation and Derogation Provisions in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,” and can be found here.
The participants included
[a] group of 31 distinguished experts in international law … from Brazil, Canada, Chile, Egypt, France, Greece, Hungary, India, Ireland, Kuwait, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom, the United States of America, the United Nations Center for Human Rights, the International Labor Organization, and the sponsoring organizations … agreed … upon the need for a close examination of the conditions and groups for permissible limitations and derogations [of civil and political rights].
UN guidelines stipulate that in the event that the integrity of a member state is threatened, meaning if a disease outbreak or other health emergency arises that poses the risk of state collapse, the suspension of certain human rights can be limited or removed, temporarily.
Any such moratorium is, per the Siracusa Principles, proscribed in the following ways:
It must be based upon scientific evidence; It must exist for a finite, predetermined amount of time; It must be proportional to the effort; It must be subject to review; It must respect human dignity
Let’s set aside that a group of international attorneys drew up guidelines for when human rights can be suspended in the interest of preserving governments – which in terms of U.N. membership runs from democratically-elected officials to totalitarian regimes.
During the novel coronavirus pandemic of 2020, other than a handful of mealy-mouthed, sanctimonious press releases and speeches, the leadership of the UN stood by – not even deploying their classically impotent, symbolic measures.
There were no legal actions, no threats of sanction, no requests for additional information, and no deployment of observation teams. Open-ended lockdowns, threats against civilians, and a wide range of other human rights violations were undertaken the world over. Many endure to this day, all but neglected by the appointed global watchdog for “peace” and “dignity.”
Expert Dithering
Comments from the Office of the Secretary General (SecGen) of the UN predictably wove a noncommittal, contradictory path as brutal policy responses to the pandemic drew on from weeks to months:
On Feb 28, 2020, the SecGen said in a press conference: “Now is the time for all governments to step up and do everything possible to contain the disease – and to do so without stigmatization, and respecting human rights. We know containment is possible, but the window of opportunity is narrowing.”
One week later on March 6, 2020, a spokesperson for the Rights Chief at the UN Office of the High Commissioner warned that “people who are already barely surviving economically, may all too easily be pushed over the edge by the measures being adopted to contain the virus.”
By April 2020, roughly half of Earth’s population – 3.9billion people in no less than 90 countries or territories – were ordered to stay at home.
On April 20, 2020, World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General Tedros urged caution in lifting lockdowns: “So-called lockdowns can help to take the heat out of a country’s epidemic, but they cannot do it alone,” adding that other methods including test and trace should be initiated as well. (The WHO is the directing and coordinating authority for health matters within the United Nations system.)
On April 27, 2020 – well over a month after many of the lockdowns went into effect – came a statement from the UN Human Rights Office: Countries must “not use the COVID crisis as a pretext for repressive measures[.]”
On May 14, 2020, the UN Human Rights Commissioner again urged governments to be cautious when lifting lockdowns, adding that allowing “politics or economics” to drive decisions is unwise. Unsurprisingly, in mid-July UNICEF announced that the food security of some 132 million people could be in jeopardy by the end of 2020.
And on it went, until on September 24th the SecGen blamed the failure to control the virus on a “lack of global preparedness, cooperation, unity, and solidarity.” And less than a week later with no shame or irony, he commented that “[t]he economic and social consequences [of the pandemic] are as bad as we feared, and in some cases, worse.”
It’s not news that for the United Nations, economics are a distant consideration of any discussion, not least of which is human rights. But in light of this year’s colossal failings, the time is right for an U.N.-free world; at the very least, a U.S.-free U.N.
Enough Is Enough
Defenders of the United Nations have a number of parries at the ready against the standard array of criticisms.
They argue that in a world where so much instability is created by nonstate entities – terror networks, for example – the impactfulness of a multi-state organization is blunted.
Those excuses don’t apply here: this wasn’t a global terror group or a regional threat. The political response to the pandemic took the wholly undisguised form of governments threatening, imprisoning, and in some cases attacking their own citizens.
If, as politicians are fond of saying, the battle against the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is a “war,” UN member firms have been engaged in war crimes on a scale not seen since World War II.
Now: no one would (or should) make the argument that the scope of death camps, forced labor, and summary executions in the first half of the 1940s matches that of tyrannical, widespread disease mitigation policies.
Yet the depraved indifference with which the global scale of lockdowns, and in particular the wholesale economic destruction of communities has been received by the named invigilator warrants comparison.
Add in the likelihood of widespread hunger and such inevitable costs as worldwide increases in stress disorders, spikes in suicides, and widespread substance abuse and the comparison becomes even more reasonable.
Of the U.N.’s “myriad failings and… glaring inadequacies” – and whether explained by cowardice, corruption, or indecision – the failure to speak clearly in favor of human rights (with science and history squarely on the side of standing up for human rights) is low from which the United Nations should not be permitted to recover.
That is to say, not in its present or any other form.
It’s bad enough that the United States government has a history of supporting brutal regimes with taxpayer dollars.
American taxpayers financing an estimated 22% of the U.N. operating budget and just south of 30% of the so-called peacekeeping budget for an organization that won’t stand up for our human rights, let alone that of billions of others, has never more clearly been indefensible.
Source: AIER.org


humansarefree--2020-10-13--IRS Colluded With Clinton Foundation to Cheat Taxpayers Out of $2.5 Billion

An interesting development has emerged concerning the Clinton family crime syndicate that suggests the highly corrupt Clinton Foundation colluded with the Internal Revenue Service ( IRS ) to cheat the tax system out of $ 2.5 billion .
As revealed on the Thomas Paine Podcast – listen here – a federal judge has pegged the IRS for illicit conduct in sheltering the Clinton Foundation from having to pay as much as $ 2.5 billion in unpaid federal back taxes .
In what the podcast describes as “ a rare overture , ” the judge in the case has sided with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Larry Doyle , allowing their case against the Clinton Foundation to proceed .
Meanwhile , the IRS has been smacked down in its efforts to cover both for itself and for the Clintons .
Besides smacking down the IRS “ big time , ” the judge in the case also uncovered “ damning and alarming documents and facts in the case ” that “ until now ha [ ve ] been sealed and kept secret from the public.
” These documents and facts apparently reveal that both the Department of Justice ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ behalf of the Clintons , rather than the American people , committing many other egregious crimes along the way .
Just like how the FBI ( Federal Bureau of Investigation ) was caught covering for pedophile Jeffrey Epstein and other Clinton associates , the IRS and the DoJ have now been exposed as criminal organizations that exist not to serve We the People , but rather to make dirty politicians , like the Clintons , rich .
Nothing about the Clinton Foundation ’ s financials makes any legitimate sense Moynihan and Doyle have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Clinton Foundation for at least the past five years .
What they have uncovered has been nothing short of eye-opening , though not surprising to those familiar with how the Clintons operate .
Back in 2015 , Moynihan and Doyle were solicited by a sizable contingent of “ wealthy , high-profile people , ” according to Evie Magazine , who wanted them to investigate the Clinton Foundation .
Now that they are , bombshells are dropping almost daily about the Clinton family crime syndicate that have been a long time coming .
Using @ @ @ @ @ @ @ started to collect documents that same year tracking the money that went in and out of the Clinton Foundation .
They carefully evaluated the so-called non-profit ‘ s forms and documents , as well as income statements , attached schedules and lists of major donors .
After comparing and trying to reconcile these documents with both the donors and the Foundation ’ s net assets , Moynihan and Doyle determined that the amount of money coming in simply did not make sense based on the expenses associated with the Foundation ’ s projects @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of its existence , the Clinton Foundation had been penalized for improper registration in some states , which it conveniently did not acknowledge in others as required and stated under penalty of perjury .
Much more was also revealed by Clinton Foundation CFO Andrew Kessel , who called Moynihan the day after Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 election to spill the beans .
Kessel reportedly had breakfast with Moynihan , during which he revealed “ very incriminating ” information about how the Clinton Foundation had been operating .
Both Moynihan and Doyle have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ revealed .
“ Kessel told them about ‘ mixing and matching of funds ‘ and ‘ expense abuse , ’ ” writes Paula Gallagher for Evie .
“ Kessel also said that he and others had brought these incidents to Bill Clinton ’ s attention multiple times ‘ but there was no talking to him.
’ ” You can read Gallagher ’ s full analysis of what more was revealed at this link .

An interesting development has emerged concerning the Clinton family crime syndicate that suggests the highly corrupt Clinton Foundation colluded with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to cheat the tax system out of $2.5 billion.
by Ethan Huff
As revealed on the Thomas Paine Podcast – listen here – a federal judge has pegged the IRS for illicit conduct in sheltering the Clinton Foundation from having to pay as much as $2.5 billion in unpaid federal back taxes.
In what the podcast describes as “a rare overture,” the judge in the case has sided with pro-se litigants and Clinton whistleblowers John Moynihan and Larry Doyle, allowing their case against the Clinton Foundation to proceed. Meanwhile, the IRS has been smacked down in its efforts to cover both for itself and for the Clintons.
Besides smacking down the IRS “big time,” the judge in the case also uncovered “damning and alarming documents and facts in the case” that “until now ha[ve] been sealed and kept secret from the public.”
These documents and facts apparently reveal that both the Department of Justice (DoJ) and the IRS worked on behalf of the Clintons, rather than the American people, committing many other egregious crimes along the way.
Just like how the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) was caught covering for pedophile Jeffrey Epstein and other Clinton associates, the IRS and the DoJ have now been exposed as criminal organizations that exist not to serve We the People, but rather to make dirty politicians, like the Clintons, rich.
Nothing about the Clinton Foundation’s financials makes any legitimate sense
Moynihan and Doyle have been probing the inner workings of the Clinton Foundation for at least the past five years.
What they have uncovered has been nothing short of eye-opening, though not surprising to those familiar with how the Clintons operate.
Back in 2015, Moynihan and Doyle were solicited by a sizable contingent of “wealthy, high-profile people,” according to Evie Magazine, who wanted them to investigate the Clinton Foundation.
Now that they are, bombshells are dropping almost daily about the Clinton family crime syndicate that have been a long time coming.
Using their own funds, Moynihan and Doyle started to collect documents that same year tracking the money that went in and out of the Clinton Foundation.
They carefully evaluated the so-called non-profit‘s forms and documents, as well as income statements, attached schedules and lists of major donors.
After comparing and trying to reconcile these documents with both the donors and the Foundation’s net assets, Moynihan and Doyle determined that the amount of money coming in simply did not make sense based on the expenses associated with the Foundation’s projects and programs.
In the early days of its existence, the Clinton Foundation had been penalized for improper registration in some states, which it conveniently did not acknowledge in others as required and stated under penalty of perjury.
Much more was also revealed by Clinton Foundation CFO Andrew Kessel, who called Moynihan the day after Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 election to spill the beans.
Kessel reportedly had breakfast with Moynihan, during which he revealed “very incriminating” information about how the Clinton Foundation had been operating.
Both Moynihan and Doyle have since testified under oath about what Kessel revealed.
“Kessel told them about ‘mixing and matching of funds‘ and ‘expense abuse,’” writes Paula Gallagher for Evie. “Kessel also said that he and others had brought these incidents to Bill Clinton’s attention multiple times ‘but there was no talking to him.’”
You can read Gallagher’s full analysis of what more was revealed at this link.


humansarefree--2020-10-13--New Spotlight Coming to COVID Crimes Against Humanity

Germany seems to have become a hotspot for challenge to the official COVID line .
Up to now , it ’ s been most visibly the public , this being the most recent .
Now , however , a professional group has gathered , showing some big teeth , including some high-powered medical and legal ones .
This development — inspired by the questions surrounding COVID , by the unjustified devastations and injustice caused by lockdowns , and by media censorship of professionals offering another point of view — is told in a 49-minute video entitled Crimes Against Humanity .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ s pulling nearly 1.2 million views , 49k likes and over 10,000 comments .
Fortunately , we have a PDF of an invaluable ( highlighted ) full transcript ( Summary included below ) , lovingly prepared by the inimitable Claire Edwards , a former staffer and translator at the UN and a skilled , tireless , no-holds-barred worker for truth , social justice and liberty .
The reader can negotiate it in much less than 49 minutes , although the sincerity of the speaker comes across in the video and is worth seeing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has embellished the video title , based on a comment by Dr Füllmich about the level of this outrage .
I wouldn ’ t ‘ dispute , ’ except to say it ’ s certainly in contention for the ‘ honor ’ of “ The Greatest Crime Against Humanity Ever Committed ” .
Especially in the context of COVID being exploited by a relatively few very wealthy people and organizations to push thoroughgoing , societal engineering globally — a sort of phoenix rising from the deliberately wrought lockdown ashes .
All for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of course .
Especially if you enjoy meticulous data profiling , total surveillance , with direct micromanagement and thought/ behavior control via technology , the foundation being wireless telecom/WiFi .
Important Note : The doctor talks about a “ PCR test ” having been created by one Professor Drosten – that was used by Germany to establish its lockdown – without having seen the Wuhan virus ( SARS-Cov-2 ) .
The earliest date I ’ ve been able to find on the isolation and genome description is 2/25/20 .
Thus , if Drosten @ @ @ @ @ @ @ crapshoot as the doctor suggests ( but it also makes a point relating to the doctor ’ s account of herd immunity ) .
A bit tricky to get from the video , but clear as day in the transcript ( an example what ’ s so valuable about it ) : In PDF paragraph C on p. 6 , Füllmich notes the origin of PCR , its inventor Kary Mullis .
I spent days off and on in vain trying to find a direct quote from Mullis about the function of PCR @ @ @ @ @ @ @ diagnostics .
It seems there are only reports of this .
Anyone ?
Years later , a new ‘ version ’ of PCR ( full name RT-PCR , RT referring to the process of converting viral RNA to DNA prior to the PCR process ) was invented .
It ’ s called “ quantitative ” PCR – qRT-PCR .
The name is misleading , because it still won ’ t give viral load in the subject .
For the interested , this matter is addressed in detail in the section Confirmed COVID Cases @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Corona Hysteria Equals Hysteria Squared .
Going by a timeline , one can strongly infer that Mullis was talking about the “ q ” version when he is alleged to have said “ Quantitative PCR is an oxymoron.
” Some interesting information there also about HIV/AIDS and big questions surrounding that .
Perhaps the most important thing to keep in mind about the pandemic is that not a single reliable science paper exists proving the SARS-CoV-2 causes COVID-19 – regardless of any “ cases ” one might have seen firsthand in people .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ in mind about the test , other than its inability to establish viral load , is its ability to call you positive even if your immune function has worked ( which ‘ they ’ give no credence to , other than its imminent ‘ perfection ’ via poison needle ) and de-activated the virus .
You are ipso facto an “ asymptomatic case.
” The Corona Scandal : “ The Greatest Crime Against Humanity Ever Committed ” Ultimate Proof : Covid-19 Was Planned To Usher In The New World Order The German Corona @ @ @ @ @ @ @ large number of international scientists and experts since July 10 , 2020 .
Their conclusions are the following : The corona crisis must be renamed the “ Corona Scandal ” • The greatest crime against humanity ever committed Those responsible must be : • There is no excess mortality in any country • 94 % of deaths in Bergamo were caused by transferring sick patients to nursing homes where they infected old people with weak immune systems • Doctors and hospitals worldwide were paid to declare deceased victims of Covid-19 o o Autopsies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by serious pre-existing conditions – Almost all deaths were very old people • Sweden ( no lockdown ) and Britain ( strict lockdown ) have comparable disease and mortality statistics • US states with and without lockdowns have comparable disease and mortality statistics • Herd immunity needs only 15-25 % population infection and is already achieved • Only when a person has symptoms can an infection be contagious • Many scientists call this a PCR-test pandemic , not a corona pandemic • Very healthy and non-infectious people may test positive • Likelihood of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ • Prof. Drosten developed his PCR test from an old SARS virus without ever having seen the real Wuhan virus from China • The PCR test is not based on scientific facts with respect to infections • PCR tests are useless for the detection of infections • A positive PCR test does not mean an infection is present or that an intact virus has been found • Amplification of samples over 35 cycles is unreliable but WHO recommended 45 cycles • The German government locked down , imposed social-distancing/ mask-wearing on the basis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was imposed when the virus was already retreating • The lockdowns were based on non-existent infections • Former president of the German federal constitutional court doubted the constitutionality of the corona measures • Former UK supreme court judge Lord Sumption concluded there was no factual basis for panic and no legal basis for corona measures • Corona measures have no sufficient factual or legal basis , are unconstitutional and must be repealed immediately • No serious scientist gives any validity to the infamous Neil Ferguson ’ s false computer models warning of millions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to report the true facts of the so-calledpandemic • Democracy is in danger of being replaced by fascist totalitarian models • Drosten ( of PCR test ) , Tedros of WHO , and others have committed crimes against humanity as defined in the International Criminal Code • Politicians can avoid going down with the charlatans and criminals by starting the long overdue public scientific discussion • Children were calculatedly made to feel responsible “ for the painful tortured death of their parents and grandparents if they do not follow Corona rules ” • @ @ @ @ @ @ @ create fear and not to diagnose • There can be no talk of a second wave • Evidence of gigantic health and economic damage to populations • Children are being taken away from their parents • Bankruptcies are expected in small- and medium-sized businesses • A class action lawsuit must be filed in the USA or Canada , with all affected parties worldwide having the opportunity to join • Companies and self-employed people must be compensated for damages

Germany seems to have become a hotspot for challenge to the official COVID line. Up to now, it’s been most visibly the public, this being the most recent.
Now, however, a professional group has gathered, showing some big teeth, including some high-powered medical and legal ones.
This development — inspired by the questions surrounding COVID, by the unjustified devastations and injustice caused by lockdowns, and by media censorship of professionals offering another point of view — is told in a 49-minute video entitled Crimes Against Humanity.
As of this moment, it’s pulling nearly 1.2 million views, 49k likes and over 10,000 comments.
Fortunately, we have a PDF of an invaluable (highlighted) full transcript (Summary included below), lovingly prepared by the inimitable Claire Edwards, a former staffer and translator at the UN and a skilled, tireless, no-holds-barred worker for truth, social justice and liberty.
The reader can negotiate it in much less than 49 minutes, although the sincerity of the speaker comes across in the video and is worth seeing. Thank you, Claire!
Claire has embellished the video title, based on a comment by Dr Füllmich about the level of this outrage.
I wouldn’t ‘dispute,’ except to say it’s certainly in contention for the ‘honor’ of “The Greatest Crime Against Humanity Ever Committed”.
Especially in the context of COVID being exploited by a relatively few very wealthy people and organizations to push thoroughgoing, societal engineering globally — a sort of phoenix rising from the deliberately wrought lockdown ashes.
All for the good of the people and planet, of course.
Especially if you enjoy meticulous data profiling, total surveillance, with direct micromanagement and thought/ behavior control via technology, the foundation being wireless telecom/WiFi.
Important Note: The doctor talks about a “PCR test” having been created by one Professor Drosten – that was used by Germany to establish its lockdown – without having seen the Wuhan virus (SARS-Cov-2).
The earliest date I’ve been able to find on the isolation and genome description is 2/25/20.
Thus, if Drosten created anything earlier, it was a crapshoot as the doctor suggests (but it also makes a point relating to the doctor’s account of herd immunity).
A bit tricky to get from the video, but clear as day in the transcript (an example what’s so valuable about it): In PDF paragraph C on p. 6, Füllmich notes the origin of PCR, its inventor Kary Mullis.
I spent days off and on in vain trying to find a direct quote from Mullis about the function of PCR, namely, research only, not diagnostics. It seems there are only reports of this. Anyone?
Years later, a new ‘version’ of PCR (full name RT-PCR, RT referring to the process of converting viral RNA to DNA prior to the PCR process) was invented.
It’s called “quantitative” PCR – qRT-PCR. The name is misleading, because it still won’t give viral load in the subject.
For the interested, this matter is addressed in detail in the section Confirmed COVID Cases? in “5G” Hysteria Times Corona Hysteria Equals Hysteria Squared.
Going by a timeline, one can strongly infer that Mullis was talking about the “q” version when he is alleged to have said “Quantitative PCR is an oxymoron.”
Some interesting information there also about HIV/AIDS and big questions surrounding that.
Perhaps the most important thing to keep in mind about the pandemic is that not a single reliable science paper exists proving the SARS-CoV-2 causes COVID-19 – regardless of any “cases” one might have seen firsthand in people.
Perhaps the most important point to keep in mind about the test, other than its inability to establish viral load, is its ability to call you positive even if your immune function has worked (which ‘they’ give no credence to, other than its imminent ‘perfection’ via poison needle) and de-activated the virus. You are ipso facto an “asymptomatic case.”
The Corona Scandal: “The Greatest Crime Against Humanity Ever Committed”
Ultimate Proof: Covid-19 Was Planned To Usher In The New World Order
The German Corona Investigative Committee has taken testimony from a large number of international scientists and experts since July 10, 2020. Their conclusions are the following:
The corona crisis must be renamed the “Corona Scandal”
It is:
The biggest tort case ever
The greatest crime against humanity ever committed
Those responsible must be:
Criminally prosecuted for crimes against humanity
Sued for civil damages
Deaths
There is no excess mortality in any country
Corona virus mortality equals seasonal flu
94% of deaths in Bergamo were caused by transferring sick patients to nursing homes where they infected old people with weak immune systems
Doctors and hospitals worldwide were paid to declare deceased victims of Covid-19 o o Autopsies showed:
– Fatalities almost all caused by serious pre-existing conditions
– Almost all deaths were very old people
Sweden (no lockdown) and Britain (strict lockdown) have comparable disease and mortality statistics
US states with and without lockdowns have comparable disease and mortality statistics
Health
Hospitals remain empty and some face bankruptcy
Populations have T-cell immunity from previous influenza waves
Herd immunity needs only 15-25% population infection and is already achieved
Only when a person has symptoms can an infection be contagious
Tests:
Many scientists call this a PCR-test pandemic, not a corona pandemic
Very healthy and non-infectious people may test positive
Likelihood of false-positives is 89-94% or near certainty
Prof. Drosten developed his PCR test from an old SARS virus without ever having seen the real Wuhan virus from China
The PCR test is not based on scientific facts with respect to infections
PCR tests are useless for the detection of infections
A positive PCR test does not mean an infection is present or that an intact virus has been found
Amplification of samples over 35 cycles is unreliable but WHO recommended 45 cycles
Illegality:
The German government locked down, imposed social-distancing/ mask-wearing on the basis of a single opinion
The lockdown was imposed when the virus was already retreating
The lockdowns were based on non-existent infections
Former president of the German federal constitutional court doubted the constitutionality of the corona measures
Former UK supreme court judge Lord Sumption concluded there was no factual basis for panic and no legal basis for corona measures
German RKI (CDC equivalent) recommended no autopsies be performed
Corona measures have no sufficient factual or legal basis, are unconstitutional and must be repealed immediately
No serious scientist gives any validity to the infamous Neil Ferguson’s false computer models warning of millions of deaths
Mainstream media completely failed to report the true facts of the so-calledpandemic
Democracy is in danger of being replaced by fascist totalitarian models
Drosten (of PCR test), Tedros of WHO, and others have committed crimes against humanity as defined in the International Criminal Code
Politicians can avoid going down with the charlatans and criminals by starting the long overdue public scientific discussion
Conspiracy:
Politicians and mainstream media deliberately drove populations to panic
Children were calculatedly made to feel responsible “for the painful tortured death of their parents and grandparents if they do not follow Corona rules”
The hopeless PCR test is used to create fear and not to diagnose
There can be no talk of a second wave
Injury and damage:
Evidence of gigantic health and economic damage to populations
Anti-corona measures have:
– Killed innumerable people
– Destroyed countless companies and individuals worldwide
Children are being taken away from their parents
Children are traumatized en masse
Bankruptcies are expected in small- and medium-sized businesses
Redress:
A class action lawsuit must be filed in the USA or Canada, with all affected parties worldwide having the opportunity to join
Companies and self-employed people must be compensated for damages
Source: ActivistPost.com / Video Transcript Download (PDF)


humansarefree--2020-10-13--Former Australian Senator Claims ‘Great Reset’ is Real Agenda Behind COVID Panic

Former Australian Senator Cory Bernardi presented a piece for Sky News Australia in which he claimed that the agenda behind the COVID panic was for elite Davos billionaires to bring about a “ great reset ” that would see permanent social and economic changes .
Noting that there is “ something unusual about the continuing pandemic panic , ” Bernardi cited medical experts who “ now acknowledge that lockdowns don ’ t work ” and asked viewers to “ consider if there is another agenda at work.
” Indeed , in a recent interview with the Spectator , the World @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID-19 , Dr David Nabarro , called on world leaders to stop using lockdowns as their primary method of control because they were making “ poor people an awful lot poorer.
” Bernardi then highlighted comments made by Klaus Schwab , founder and Chairman of the World Economic Forum , who told fellow globalists that COVID-19 had proven the old system to be inadequate and that , “ Now is the historical moment of time not only to fight the… virus but to shape the system… for the post-corona era.
” “ ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the new excuse to usher in the Green New Deal that climate alarmists , profiteers and big government have been pushing for years , ” said Bernardi , adding that “ the global response to COVID has been a green socialist ’ s dream.
” The former Senator noted how the coronavirus pandemic had facilitated the opportunity to impose a very similar crackdown that technocrats had previously sought to justify under the banner of climate change , namely , shutting down economies , lowering fuel consumption and airline travel as well as curtailing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Why do you think the Australian Greens have been so quiet these past months … it ’ s because their policy agenda is coming to life ?
” asked Bernardi .
“ After decades of peddling climate change lies and propaganda to force government by the elites , the socialists have used a media induced hysteria over public health as their latest weapon of economic destruction , ” he added .
Highlighting how many of the same scientists who have convinced governments to impose draconian lockdowns were also involved in IPCC computer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Bernardi concludes that the COVID lockdown looks an awful lot like the ‘ Green New Deal ’ and will have the same disastrous impact on the global economy .

Former Australian Senator Cory Bernardi presented a piece for Sky News Australia in which he claimed that the agenda behind the COVID panic was for elite Davos billionaires to bring about a “great reset” that would see permanent social and economic changes.
Noting that there is “something unusual about the continuing pandemic panic,” Bernardi cited medical experts who “now acknowledge that lockdowns don’t work” and asked viewers to “consider if there is another agenda at work.”
Indeed, in a recent interview with the Spectator, the World Health Organization’s special envoy on COVID-19, Dr David Nabarro, called on world leaders to stop using lockdowns as their primary method of control because they were making “poor people an awful lot poorer.”
Bernardi then highlighted comments made by Klaus Schwab, founder and Chairman of the World Economic Forum, who told fellow globalists that COVID-19 had proven the old system to be inadequate and that,
“Now is the historical moment of time not only to fight the… virus but to shape the system… for the post-corona era.”
“(Mr Schwab) admits that COVID is the new excuse to usher in the Green New Deal that climate alarmists, profiteers and big government have been pushing for years,” said Bernardi, adding that “the global response to COVID has been a green socialist’s dream.”
The former Senator noted how the coronavirus pandemic had facilitated the opportunity to impose a very similar crackdown that technocrats had previously sought to justify under the banner of climate change, namely, shutting down economies, lowering fuel consumption and airline travel as well as curtailing civil liberties and freedom of movement.
“Why do you think the Australian Greens have been so quiet these past months … it’s because their policy agenda is coming to life?” asked Bernardi.
“After decades of peddling climate change lies and propaganda to force government by the elites, the socialists have used a media induced hysteria over public health as their latest weapon of economic destruction,” he added.
Highlighting how many of the same scientists who have convinced governments to impose draconian lockdowns were also involved in IPCC computer modeling that produced alarmist global warming forecasts, Bernardi concludes that the COVID lockdown looks an awful lot like the ‘Green New Deal’ and will have the same disastrous impact on the global economy.
Source: Summit.news


humansarefree--2020-10-13--5G Health Risks: The War Between Technology and Human Beings

Over 180 scientists and doctors in almost 40 countries are warning the world about 5G health risks .
These scientists ’ response to “ Resolution 1815 of the Council of Europe ” spells it out quite succinctly : “ We , the undersigned scientists , recommend a moratorium on the roll-out of the fifth generation , 5G , until potential hazards for human health and the environment have been fully investigated by scientists independent from industry .
“ 5G will substantially increase exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields ( RF-EMF ) … and has been proven to be harmful for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re not alarmed about 5G radiation dangers , you should be… With download speeds up to 20 to 30X faster than 4G , 5G promises a new world , including becoming the foundation for self-driving cars while also causing a long list of potential health risks .
“ 5G Cancer ” may actually be a thing .
The cities of Brussels and Geneva have even blocked trials and banned upgrades to 5G out of this concern .
The difference between 4G and 5G in terms of gigahertz , the unit of alternating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ EM ) waves that affect the transmission speeds of devices , is significant .
5G technology promises radio millimeter bands in the 30 to 300 GHz range , while 4G tops out at around 6GHz .
When applied to video latency , this translates to speeds up to 60 to 120 times faster .
Before 2G , 3G , and 4G , radio frequencies were benign .
We never worried whether or not our drive-time radio shows would fry our brains .
Sadly , once the concept of wireless “ G ” technology @ @ @ @ @ @ @ global public to frequencies akin to microwaves at 1 billion cycles per second .
Humans , animals and the environment have all been at risk for years .
While 4G was bad enough , 5G takes the game to a whole new level of insanity .
5G ( or 5th Generation ) refers to the latest advancement in wireless systems .
5G promises to bring larger channels , higher speeds , larger packets of data , exponential responsiveness , and the ability to connect a host of devices from a single location .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t all work the same .
Some will be slow , and some of these networks will be super-fast , but with limited coverage .
Eventually , they will form a global grid , unlike anything the Earth has seen .
While it would be fair to assume that 5G technology has been tested for risks , this is simply not the case .
There is no compelling data on health risks .
When 5G launches , it will be the first actual test on human beings ever performed .
This is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tech launch .
While 4G ’ s wavelengths travel along the surface of the skin , 5G ’ s millimeter waves are more insidious .
When 5G wavelengths are emitted , our skin will automatically absorb them , which will naturally cause the skin to rise in temperature .
Already live in three countries , 5G is the first global electromagnetic radiation test on human beings in the history of Planet Earth .
While most wireless industry executives kibosh the long list of legitimate 5G health concerns , most scientists believe that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tests are needed .
Many scientists understand that the electromagnetic radiation leaking through the doors of our microwave ovens are carcinogenic , and therefore , can cause cancer .
Most of these scientists also believe that these waves are mutagenic , meaning they change the DNA structure of living beings .
The launch of 5G will be similar to turning on your microwave , opening its door , and leaving it on for the rest of your life .
There ’ s a good reason why hundreds of scientists are taking action against @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ten years , 5G technology has been in development .
Originally planned as a layer atop 3G and 4G , 5G is fast becoming a world of its own .
Every cell tower in your neighborhood emits radio frequency ( RF ) radiation .
Radiation causes cancer .
By 2021 , every city will have 5G towers and cell stations .
These devices will be on the top or side of millions of buildings throughout the world .
The wireless industry is not just building an infrastructure that provides faster downloads ; it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Yes , 5G towers and mini-stations are extremely dangerous .
Not only are the shorter millimeter waves more hazardous to human beings , because of the intensity of the technology , but it will also require millions of more mini cell towers than before , potentially one tower per 2 to 8 houses .
This means a human being ’ s RF radiation exposure will not only increase , but it will also exponentially increase within months .
These towers are not only dangerous ; they ’ re lethal – and should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ While there is a lot of chatter against the anti-5G community , there are also a lot of compelling discussions between scientists who are waging war against the untested technology .
In general , radiation does one major thing to human beings and animals – it destroys our DNA , either by forcing the DNA to mutate or by killing specific groups of cells , all of which lead to cancer .
Here ’ s what to expect if you experience prolonged exposure to radiation : How to Protect Yourself from 5G Besides @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we are limited in ways to protect ourselves from this dangerous technology .
Cell tower radiation health effects are real .
Because there will be thousands of these towers and stations in every city , it will be almost impossible to avoid them .
Given how addicted we are to our devices , the general public will tend toward risking life and limb to support our screen-related addictions .
That said , there are some things we can do to protect ourselves from radiation .
The more we focus on our health and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can defend against the challenges related to 5G radiation .
Spirulina , Wheat Grass , Vitamin C , and similar supplements are consumable forms of sunlight , which will always improve our health and raise our vibrations .
Yoga , meditation , chanting , mantras and other forms of prayer can also be beneficial in protecting our life-energies .
While fear can weaken our electromagnetic fields , love , intimacy and social vulnerability can strengthen them .
The most important thing we can do is focus on improving our health , states of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ always have control of our future , even if the general public is headed in another direction .
Here are a few ideas to give you a fighting chance : • Do not live near a cell tower or mini station .
• Purchase an EMF shield , and continue to measure the levels of radiation within 100 feet of your home .
• Spend lots of time in the forest .
• Refrain from using your cell phone for long periods , including never keeping your cell phone in your bedroom .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , store it in an EMF protective bag .
• Consider purchasing some Orgonite , which reportedly scatters electromagnetic fields and turns them into beneficial ones .
Dr. Wilhelm Reich developed this unique composite .
• Continually educate yourself about the wireless industry and the global government support of this insane endeavor .
• Remain strong , stay out of fear and continue to improve your vibration through positive thinking , forgiveness , and increased attention toward your mental , emotional and physical health .
You can become a member of the Gaia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ library of original series , films & documentaries .

Over 180 scientists and doctors in almost 40 countries are warning the world about 5G health risks. These scientists’ response to “Resolution 1815 of the Council of Europe” spells it out quite succinctly:
“We, the undersigned scientists, recommend a moratorium on the roll-out of the fifth generation, 5G, until potential hazards for human health and the environment have been fully investigated by scientists independent from industry.
“5G will substantially increase exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF)… and has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment.”
If you’re not alarmed about 5G radiation dangers, you should be…
With download speeds up to 20 to 30X faster than 4G, 5G promises a new world, including becoming the foundation for self-driving cars while also causing a long list of potential health risks.
“5G Cancer” may actually be a thing. The cities of Brussels and Geneva have even blocked trials and banned upgrades to 5G out of this concern.
The difference between 4G and 5G in terms of gigahertz, the unit of alternating current (AC) or electromagnetic (EM) waves that affect the transmission speeds of devices, is significant.
5G technology promises radio millimeter bands in the 30 to 300 GHz range, while 4G tops out at around 6GHz. When applied to video latency, this translates to speeds up to 60 to 120 times faster.
Before 2G, 3G, and 4G, radio frequencies were benign. We never worried whether or not our drive-time radio shows would fry our brains.
Sadly, once the concept of wireless “G” technology was initiated, we began exposing the global public to frequencies akin to microwaves at 1 billion cycles per second.
Humans, animals and the environment have all been at risk for years. While 4G was bad enough, 5G takes the game to a whole new level of insanity.
Living in a 5G World
5G (or 5th Generation) refers to the latest advancement in wireless systems. 5G promises to bring larger channels, higher speeds, larger packets of data, exponential responsiveness, and the ability to connect a host of devices from a single location.
At the start, 5G networks won’t all work the same. Some will be slow, and some of these networks will be super-fast, but with limited coverage. Eventually, they will form a global grid, unlike anything the Earth has seen.
While it would be fair to assume that 5G technology has been tested for risks, this is simply not the case. There is no compelling data on health risks.
When 5G launches, it will be the first actual test on human beings ever performed. This is unprecedented for such a wide-scale, public tech launch.
While 4G’s wavelengths travel along the surface of the skin, 5G’s millimeter waves are more insidious. When 5G wavelengths are emitted, our skin will automatically absorb them, which will naturally cause the skin to rise in temperature.
Already live in three countries, 5G is the first global electromagnetic radiation test on human beings in the history of Planet Earth.
While most wireless industry executives kibosh the long list of legitimate 5G health concerns, most scientists believe that the public is in danger and that further tests are needed.
Does 5G Cause Cancer?
Many scientists understand that the electromagnetic radiation leaking through the doors of our microwave ovens are carcinogenic, and therefore, can cause cancer.
Most of these scientists also believe that these waves are mutagenic, meaning they change the DNA structure of living beings.
The launch of 5G will be similar to turning on your microwave, opening its door, and leaving it on for the rest of your life.
There’s a good reason why hundreds of scientists are taking action against the wireless industry.
Are 5G Towers Dangerous?
For the past ten years, 5G technology has been in development. Originally planned as a layer atop 3G and 4G, 5G is fast becoming a world of its own.
Every cell tower in your neighborhood emits radio frequency (RF) radiation. Radiation causes cancer.
By 2021, every city will have 5G towers and cell stations. These devices will be on the top or side of millions of buildings throughout the world.
The wireless industry is not just building an infrastructure that provides faster downloads; it’s building a global microwave oven.
Yes, 5G towers and mini-stations are extremely dangerous. Not only are the shorter millimeter waves more hazardous to human beings, because of the intensity of the technology, but it will also require millions of more mini cell towers than before, potentially one tower per 2 to 8 houses.
This means a human being’s RF radiation exposure will not only increase, but it will also exponentially increase within months.
These towers are not only dangerous; they’re lethal – and should be considered a crime against humanity.
Health Risks of 5G Technology
While there is a lot of chatter against the anti-5G community, there are also a lot of compelling discussions between scientists who are waging war against the untested technology.
In general, radiation does one major thing to human beings and animals – it destroys our DNA, either by forcing the DNA to mutate or by killing specific groups of cells, all of which lead to cancer.
Here’s what to expect if you experience prolonged exposure to radiation:
Nausea
Swelling
Hair Loss
Decreased appetite
Low energy
General malaise
Damaged bone marrow
Damaged organs
Deep depression
Confusion
Infections
Incapacitation and Death
How to Protect Yourself from 5G
Besides moving to Mars or the Moon, we are limited in ways to protect ourselves from this dangerous technology. Cell tower radiation health effects are real.
Because there will be thousands of these towers and stations in every city, it will be almost impossible to avoid them.
Given how addicted we are to our devices, the general public will tend toward risking life and limb to support our screen-related addictions.
That said, there are some things we can do to protect ourselves from radiation. The more we focus on our health and diet, the more our immune systems can defend against the challenges related to 5G radiation.
Spirulina, Wheat Grass, Vitamin C, and similar supplements are consumable forms of sunlight, which will always improve our health and raise our vibrations.
Yoga, meditation, chanting, mantras and other forms of prayer can also be beneficial in protecting our life-energies.
While fear can weaken our electromagnetic fields, love, intimacy and social vulnerability can strengthen them.
The most important thing we can do is focus on improving our health, states of mind and exposure to nature. We always have control of our future, even if the general public is headed in another direction.
Here are a few ideas to give you a fighting chance:
Do not live near a cell tower or mini station. Purchase an EMF shield, and continue to measure the levels of radiation within 100 feet of your home. Eat healthily and take immune-boosting supplements. Spend lots of time in the forest. Refrain from using your cell phone for long periods, including never keeping your cell phone in your bedroom. When traveling with your cell phone, store it in an EMF protective bag. Consider purchasing some Orgonite, which reportedly scatters electromagnetic fields and turns them into beneficial ones. Dr. Wilhelm Reich developed this unique composite. Continually educate yourself about the wireless industry and the global government support of this insane endeavor. Remain strong, stay out of fear and continue to improve your vibration through positive thinking, forgiveness, and increased attention toward your mental, emotional and physical health.
By Paul Wagner, Gaia.com
You can become a member of the Gaia community and have access to their exclusive library of original series, films & documentaries.


humansarefree--2020-10-14--Cop Admits to Sexual Abusing 2 Teen Girls – Instead of 30 Years, He Got Just 60 Days in Jail

Police , we are told , are society ’ s finest .
Heroic men and women sacrifice themselves to protect society from criminals so that we may live long and safe lives .
If this assertion were entirely true , when these fine men and women commit a crime they are sworn to prevent , they should be held to higher standards than the rest of society because not only have they broken a law , but they have betrayed the trust of people they serve .
However , as the case below illustrates , all too often , when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ going so far as to prey on society ’ s most vulnerable , children — their badge grants them a lower standard of justice and they escape accountability .
A now-former Jefferson County Sheriff ’ s deputy was entrusted by the citizens of Jefferson County , Mo .
to serve and protect them .
However , protecting and serving were the last things this admitted child predator had on his mind .
According to police , former deputy Joshua Skaggs , 25 , was accused of molesting two children on two different occasions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the time of their sexual assaults .
Authorities say the first incident happened on September 3 , 2019 , when a 14-year-old girl was visiting Skaggs and his wife at the home .
While the relation to Skaggs was unclear , the girl ’ s story is laid out in disturbing detail in court documents .
According to the victim , as KMOV 4 reports , she was awoken around 5 a.m. by Skaggs touching her bare chest below her bra .
She said her shirt had been pulled over her bra @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s cell phone had been turned on .
She told police she thought it was possible that he had taken a photo of her .
The other incident happened when the 13-year-old was visiting Skaggs ’ home in July of 2019 .
The 13-year-old also claimed that she woke up with this child predator standing over her , lifting the waistband to her pants in an attempt to get inside them .
Both girls woke up during the abuse and both girls were terrified of telling anyone because Skaggs was a cop and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ telling .
“ The oldest was extremely scared that he ( Skaggs ) would come try to harm her , ” the mother said in a statement to News 4 .
“ The youngest daughter told us she was terrified he would hurt her or our family , and because he was a cop he wouldn ’ t get in trouble.
” After the girls came forward in September of 2019 , the department made the right decision and fired Skaggs after he denied one incident and then said the first one may @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you can accidentally start sexually assaulting a child as she sleeps .
Eventually , Skaggs pleaded guilty to the charges of child molestation and sexual abuse .
In the state of Missouri , Missouri Revised Statutes § 566.067 defines child molestation in the first degree as subjecting a child under the age of 14 to sexual contact .
Sexual contact may include touching another with one ’ s genitals or touching another ’ s genitals , anus or breasts , for the purpose of sexual arousal or gratification .
This describes Skaggs ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ molestation in the first degree is a class B felony , punishable by a minimum of 5 years to 15 years in state prison .
By the state ’ s own guidelines , Skaggs should have done a minimum of 5 years for each of the charges .
However , this corrupt system , that imprisons pot users for decades , sentenced this badge wearing child molester to just 60 days in jail .
In this exact same county , in 1996 , Jeff Mizanskey was sentenced to life in prison without parole @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , this cop sexual assaults two children and he gets just two months in prison .
Naturally , the two girls are traumatized from being molested by a cop they trusted and the fact that he ’ s only going to jail for 60 days makes it even worse .
“ It has affected our entire family .
I have started counseling for myself and we have also started family counseling to help us all get through this traumatizing event , ” she said .
“ The youngest has been diagnosed with PTSD @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even open up because she now is too scared to trust anyone .
”

Police, we are told, are society’s finest. Heroic men and women sacrifice themselves to protect society from criminals so that we may live long and safe lives.
If this assertion were entirely true, when these fine men and women commit a crime they are sworn to prevent, they should be held to higher standards than the rest of society because not only have they broken a law, but they have betrayed the trust of people they serve.
However, as the case below illustrates, all too often, when a police officer betrays this trust — going so far as to prey on society’s most vulnerable, children — their badge grants them a lower standard of justice and they escape accountability.
A now-former Jefferson County Sheriff’s deputy was entrusted by the citizens of Jefferson County, Mo. to serve and protect them.
However, protecting and serving were the last things this admitted child predator had on his mind.
According to police, former deputy Joshua Skaggs, 25, was accused of molesting two children on two different occasions. The victims were 14 and 13-years-old at the time of their sexual assaults.
Authorities say the first incident happened on September 3, 2019, when a 14-year-old girl was visiting Skaggs and his wife at the home.
While the relation to Skaggs was unclear, the girl’s story is laid out in disturbing detail in court documents.
According to the victim, as KMOV 4 reports, she was awoken around 5 a.m. by Skaggs touching her bare chest below her bra.
She said her shirt had been pulled over her bra, and the light from Skagg’s cell phone had been turned on. She told police she thought it was possible that he had taken a photo of her.
The other incident happened when the 13-year-old was visiting Skaggs’ home in July of 2019.
The 13-year-old also claimed that she woke up with this child predator standing over her, lifting the waistband to her pants in an attempt to get inside them.
Both girls woke up during the abuse and both girls were terrified of telling anyone because Skaggs was a cop and he would try to hurt them for telling.
“The oldest was extremely scared that he (Skaggs) would come try to harm her,” the mother said in a statement to News 4.
“The youngest daughter told us she was terrified he would hurt her or our family, and because he was a cop he wouldn’t get in trouble.”
After the girls came forward in September of 2019, the department made the right decision and fired Skaggs after he denied one incident and then said the first one may have been an accident — as if you can accidentally start sexually assaulting a child as she sleeps.
Eventually, Skaggs pleaded guilty to the charges of child molestation and sexual abuse.
In the state of Missouri, Missouri Revised Statutes § 566.067 defines child molestation in the first degree as subjecting a child under the age of 14 to sexual contact.
Sexual contact may include touching another with one’s genitals or touching another’s genitals, anus or breasts, for the purpose of sexual arousal or gratification.
This describes Skaggs’ actions on those nights succinctly.
Child molestation in the first degree is a class B felony, punishable by a minimum of 5 years to 15 years in state prison. By the state’s own guidelines, Skaggs should have done a minimum of 5 years for each of the charges.
However, this corrupt system, that imprisons pot users for decades, sentenced this badge wearing child molester to just 60 days in jail.
In this exact same county, in 1996, Jeff Mizanskey was sentenced to life in prison without parole for selling marijuana.
In the meantime, this cop sexual assaults two children and he gets just two months in prison.
Naturally, the two girls are traumatized from being molested by a cop they trusted and the fact that he’s only going to jail for 60 days makes it even worse.
“It has affected our entire family. I have started counseling for myself and we have also started family counseling to help us all get through this traumatizing event,” she said.
“The youngest has been diagnosed with PTSD. The oldest is too scared to even open up because she now is too scared to trust anyone.”
Blue privilege is a crime.
Source: Thefreethoughtproject.com


humansarefree--2020-10-14--NASA Scientist Claims to Have Found a Massive Alien Spacecraft Hiding in Saturn’s Rings

As a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program , this site may earn from qualifying purchases .
We may also earn commissions on purchases from other retail websites .
“ I say it is electromagnetic because I can identify streamline patterns with respect to it I knew were what we called ‘ potential lines ’ — and that says it was electrical .
I could tell that those lines demarked the outside of an object , ” he added .
A Former NASA Engineer has made headlines around the globe after claiming that supermassive alien spacecraft exist in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Saturn ’ s massive rings .
Is Enceladus an electromagnetic vehicle supplying material for Saturn ’ s E-ring ?
Enceladus These claims were quickly spread by both American and Russian mainstream media outlets — which is kinda ’ weird — suggesting that not only are there alien spacecraft around Saturn , but these mysterious objects exist around other planets like Jupiter , Uranus , and Neptune .
The former NASA engineer , Dr. Norman Bergrun — who happens to be a vivid UFO researcher — believes the alien spacecraft are actually ‘ feeding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ via the rings , in order to “ proliferate , ” which he believes is a worrying situation .
And these spacecrafts aren ’ t new to the solar system says Dr. Bergrun .
The former NASA boffin has been saying how alien spacecraft are proliferating in our solar system since 1986 , when he published his book “ Ringmakers of Saturn.
” As noted by the Inquisitr : “ Bergrun is a distinguished former NASA research engineer who has made major innovative contributions to multiple U.S. aeronautic , missile and rocket @ @ @ @ @ @ @ many top science and engineering awards , including the California Society of Professional Engineers Archimedes Engineering Achievement Award.
” But Bergrun ’ s statements have been heavily criticized since he appeared on the controversial YouTube Channel of SecureTeam10 , noted for posting countless UFO related videos , which many skeptics have called out as being fake .
Dr. Bergrun has spoken not long ago in a video published by SecureTeam10 ’ s YouTube channel where he explains the mystery behind Saturn ’ s , its rings , and the numerous alien spacecraft that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ video , Dr. Bergrun speaks of “ long cylindrical objects ” in the rings that appear to have “ exhaust systems ” among other apparently amazing findings , reports Sputnik News .
In his book Ringmakers of Saturn , published in 1986 , Dr. Bergrun claimed that not only were Saturn ’ s ring ‘ plagued ’ by alien spacecraft , these otherworldly visitors may have been responsible for the ‘ creation of the rings ’ .
In 2016 , Dr. Bergrun said that these mysterious crafts inhabit Saturn , Uranus and Jupiter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because I can identify streamline patterns with respect to it I knew were what we called ‘ potential lines ’ — and that says it was electrical .
I could tell that those lines demarked the outside of an object , ” he added .
UFO hunters and paranormal researchers believe in Dr. Bergrun ’ s story , saying that Bergrun most likely witnessed top-secret NASA images during his time working on the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics ( NACA ) and Lockheed Martin on highly classified aerospace projects .
His conclusions , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the evidence he gathered from the images .

“I say it is electromagnetic because I can identify streamline patterns with respect to it I knew were what we called ‘potential lines’ — and that says it was electrical. I could tell that those lines demarked the outside of an object,” former NASA engineer, Dr Norman Bergrun, stated.
A Former NASA Engineer has made headlines around the globe after claiming that supermassive alien spacecraft exist in our solar system and are hiding within Saturn’s massive rings.
Is Enceladus an electromagnetic vehicle supplying material for Saturn’s E-ring? Enceladus
— Dr Norman Bergrun (@DrNormanBergrun) June 8, 2014
These claims were quickly spread by both American and Russian mainstream media outlets — which is kinda’ weird — suggesting that not only are there alien spacecraft around Saturn, but these mysterious objects exist around other planets like Jupiter, Uranus, and Neptune.
The former NASA engineer, Dr. Norman Bergrun believes the alien spacecraft are actually ‘feeding off of the energy of the planet’ via the rings, in order to “proliferate,” which he believes is a worrying situation.
And these spacecrafts aren’t new to the solar system says Dr. Bergrun.
The former NASA boffin has been saying how alien spacecraft are proliferating in our solar system since 1986, when he published his book “Ringmakers of Saturn.”
As noted by the Inquisitr:
“Bergrun is a distinguished former NASA research engineer who has made major innovative contributions to multiple U.S. aeronautic, missile and rocket programs.
“He has also won many top science and engineering awards, including the California Society of Professional Engineers Archimedes Engineering Achievement Award.”
But Bergrun’s statements have been heavily criticized since he appeared on the controversial YouTube Channel of SecureTeam10, noted for posting countless UFO related videos, which many skeptics have called out as being fake.
Dr. Bergrun has spoken not long ago in a video published by SecureTeam10’s YouTube channel where he explains the mystery behind Saturn, its rings, and the numerous alien spacecraft that he claims reside there.
In the video, Dr. Bergrun speaks of “long cylindrical objects” in the rings that appear to have “exhaust systems” among other apparently amazing findings, reports Sputnik News.
In his book Ringmakers of Saturn, published in 1986, Dr. Bergrun claimed that not only were Saturn’s ring ‘plagued’ by alien spacecraft, these otherworldly visitors may have been responsible for the ‘creation of the rings’.
In 2016, Dr. Bergrun said that these mysterious crafts inhabit Saturn, Uranus and Jupiter:
“I say it is electromagnetic because I can identify streamline patterns with respect to it I knew were what we called ‘potential lines’ — and that says it was electrical. I could tell that those lines demarked the outside of an object,” he added.
UFO hunters and paranormal researchers believe in Dr. Bergrun’s story, saying that Bergrun most likely witnessed top-secret NASA images during his time working on the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) and Lockheed Martin on highly classified aerospace projects.
His conclusions, according to UFO researchers, are based on the evidence he gathered from the images.
Reference: Ancient-code.com


humansarefree--2020-10-14--Green Feudalism: Australian Media Finally Calls Out Davos ‘Great Reset’ Agenda

This week , Sky News Australia contributor and former Australian Senator Cory Bernardi , tore open the debate on COVID after calling out a globalist agenda which few in mainstream media have dared to mention so far .
Since lockdowns began in March of 2020 , few have challenged the government rationale for voluntarily imploding their economies and destroying communities and societies – based on a guess that coronavirus might kill tens of millions of citizens .
However , Bernardi believes that the COVID-19 pandemic hysteria is being used as the Trojan horse for a globalist agenda hatched out of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It ’ s called The Great Reset , and its designed by elite billionaires supposedly to bring about ‘ social and economic change.
’ “ There is something unusual about the continuing pandemic panic , ” said Bernardi .
“ Medical experts now acknowledge that lockdowns don ’ t work… .
Now none of that makes any sense until you open your mind to consider if there is another agenda at work.
” According to technocrat , Klaus Schwab , founder and Chairman of the World Economic Forum , “ COVID 19 cases @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are not fit anymore for the 21st century , it has laid bare a fundamental lack of social cohesion , fairness , inclusion and equality.
” “ Now is the historical moment of time not only to fight the … virus but to shape the system … for the post-corona era , ” claims Schwab .
“ ( Mr Schwab ) admits that COVID is the new excuse to usher in the Green New Deal that climate alarmists , profiteers and big government have been pushing for years , ” said Bernardi .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ response to COVID has been a green socialist ’ s dream.
” Bernardi cites the fact that coordinated government shutdown policies ( not COVID ) have brought down fuel consumption and canceled international travel and bankrupted scores of airlines and travel firms already .
In addition , governments are using the ‘ pandemic ’ to permanently curtail civil liberties and freedom of movement and assembly .
“ Why do you think the Australian Greens have been so quiet these past months … it ’ s because their policy agenda is coming to life @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decades of peddling climate change lies and propaganda to force government by the elites , the socialists have used a media induced hysteria over public health as their latest weapon of economic destruction.
” The end game of creating to illusion of a global pandemic emergency is to rapidly usher-in the introduction of a ‘ Green New Deal ‘ policy – where billionaires seek to restructure our capitalist system into a new ‘ green economy ’ – promising equality and “ climate justice ” along the way .
He also highlights the fact @ @ @ @ @ @ @ institutions involved in the fraudulent over-the-top modelling of COVID deaths – are also involved in IPCC computer modeled projections of supposed future climate change .
In this segment , Mr. Bernardi explains what ’ s actually behind the mass-panic being fomented by certain governments and mainstream media , hyping the idea that the world is in the midst of a “ deadly plague ” and public health crisis .
Watch :

This week, Sky News Australia contributor and former Australian Senator Cory Bernardi, tore open the debate on COVID after calling out a globalist agenda which few in mainstream media have dared to mention so far.
Since lockdowns began in March of 2020, few have challenged the government rationale for voluntarily imploding their economies and destroying communities and societies – based on a guess that coronavirus might kill tens of millions of citizens.
However, Bernardi believes that the COVID-19 pandemic hysteria is being used as the Trojan horse for a globalist agenda hatched out of the World Economic Forum in Davos.
It’s called The Great Reset, and its designed by elite billionaires supposedly to bring about ‘social and economic change.’
“There is something unusual about the continuing pandemic panic,” said Bernardi.
“Medical experts now acknowledge that lockdowns don’t work…. Now none of that makes any sense until you open your mind to consider if there is another agenda at work.”
According to technocrat, Klaus Schwab, founder and Chairman of the World Economic Forum,
“COVID 19 cases have shown us that our old systems are not fit anymore for the 21st century, it has laid bare a fundamental lack of social cohesion, fairness, inclusion and equality.”
“Now is the historical moment of time not only to fight the … virus but to shape the system … for the post-corona era,” claims Schwab.
“(Mr Schwab) admits that COVID is the new excuse to usher in the Green New Deal that climate alarmists, profiteers and big government have been pushing for years,” said Bernardi.
“Think about it, the global response to COVID has been a green socialist’s dream.”
Bernardi cites the fact that coordinated government shutdown policies (not COVID) have brought down fuel consumption and canceled international travel and bankrupted scores of airlines and travel firms already.
In addition, governments are using the ‘pandemic’ to permanently curtail civil liberties and freedom of movement and assembly.
“Why do you think the Australian Greens have been so quiet these past months … it’s because their policy agenda is coming to life?” he asked.
“After decades of peddling climate change lies and propaganda to force government by the elites, the socialists have used a media induced hysteria over public health as their latest weapon of economic destruction.”
The end game of creating to illusion of a global pandemic emergency is to rapidly usher-in the introduction of a ‘Green New Deal‘ policy – where billionaires seek to restructure our capitalist system into a new ‘green economy’ – promising equality and “climate justice” along the way.
He also highlights the fact that many of the same scientists and institutions involved in the fraudulent over-the-top modelling of COVID deaths – are also involved in IPCC computer modeled projections of supposed future climate change.
In this segment, Mr. Bernardi explains what’s actually behind the mass-panic being fomented by certain governments and mainstream media, hyping the idea that the world is in the midst of a “deadly plague” and public health crisis. Watch:
Source: 21stCenturyWire.com


humansarefree--2020-10-14--Silenced, Censored & Ridiculed: Mainstream Media’s Lies (Documentary)

Over the past 6 months , we packed our bus & set off to bring to light the CENSORSHIP that has , and is going on around us , now more than ever .
We ventured up to Queensland , down to Victoria & through New South Wales to interview 5 individuals that have been SILENCED , CENSORED & RIDICULED by the media or Australian government in some way or another .
Each person we interviewed referred us to another … and another … resulting in this EPIC documentary – 18 unique stories sharing a similar thread – harsh , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for simply speaking their truth .
Mainstream Media : 6 Monolithic Corporations That Control Almost Everything We Watch , Hear And Read This is a labour of love – we stand to gain nothing and have a single intention – to offer another perspective , another truth to what ’ s happening in our world today .
A fuller story , so to speak .
All you have to do is take the time to sit back & watch with an open mind & heart ❤ Mainstream Media : 6 Monolithic Corporations That @ @ @ @ @ @ @ And Read There Were 88 Media Companies… Now There Are 6 — All Get Their News From Rothschild Back up link incase this film is deleted from youtube : BitChute.com

Over the past 6 months, we packed our bus & set off to bring to light the CENSORSHIP that has, and is going on around us, now more than ever.
We ventured up to Queensland, down to Victoria & through New South Wales to interview 5 individuals that have been SILENCED, CENSORED & RIDICULED by the media or Australian government in some way or another.
Each person we interviewed referred us to another … and another … resulting in this EPIC documentary – 18 unique stories sharing a similar thread – harsh, and often unjust censorship served upon them for simply speaking their truth.
Mainstream Media: 6 Monolithic Corporations That Control Almost Everything We Watch, Hear And Read
This is a labour of love – we stand to gain nothing and have a single intention – to offer another perspective, another truth to what’s happening in our world today. A fuller story, so to speak.
All you have to do is take the time to sit back & watch with an open mind & heart ❤
Mainstream Media: 6 Monolithic Corporations That Control Almost Everything We Watch, Hear And Read
There Were 88 Media Companies… Now There Are 6 — All Get Their News From Rothschild
Back up link incase this film is deleted from youtube: BitChute.com


humansarefree--2020-10-14--New York Times Calls for UN Takeover of America (Is This Treason?)

Peter Beinart , editor-at-large of Jewish Currents , recently penned an op-ed for The New York Times calling on the United Nations to stage an “ international intervention ” in order to stop Donald Trump from winning the Nov. 3 election .
Echoing the sentiment expressed by George Soros operative Zack Ford , a queer atheist social justice warrior ( SJW ) who wants to “ fix ” America through a foreign invasion , Beinart believes that the only way to ensure the United States loses its sovereignty and is absorbed into the New World Order is to have the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ No one knows how Donald Trump ’ s Covid-19 diagnosis will affect his presidential campaign , but before falling ill , he repeatedly suggested that he won ’ t accept the results of the election , should he lose , ” Beinart falsely wrote .
In order to ensure that they win the Electoral College this time around , Democrats “ must now win the popular vote by three , four or even five percentage points , ” Beinart contends .
“ They must achieve that margin in the face of a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Democratic ballots are not counted.
” Citing “ election-monitoring expert ” Judith Kelley , dean of the Sanford School of Public Policy at Duke University , Beinart says President Trump ’ s behavior so far this year is enough to prompt international election observers to “ go to countries and write up huge reports about ( it ) and say , ‘ Red flag !
Red flag !
’ ” Beinart ’ s proposed election interference is what Democrats falsely accused Trump of doing with Russia Amazingly , Beinart openly proposes having international @ @ @ @ @ @ @ force if necessary .
This is exactly what Democrats have been falsely accusing the Trump campaign of doing with Russia , by the way .
He also supports efforts by Democrat operatives like John Podesta to steal the election for Joe Biden by urging “ blue state ” governors to overturn the results if they end up in favor of Trump .
Failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has likewise told Biden directly not to concede the election to Trump under any circumstances .
“ Americans are not so inherently virtuous that they can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ oversight provides , ” Beinart goes on to write , suggesting that outside influence thwarting the election results would be a good thing for American virtues .
“ Now that Mr. Biden and other white Democrats are tasting disenfranchisement themselves , they need to learn that lesson , too , ” Beinart further contends .
Pope Francis , by the way , has called for similar U.S. absorption into the U.N. , which is necessary in order to bring to fruition his New World Order agenda .
For good measure , the U.N. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lead a human rights panel on free speech , which tells us everything we need to know about this corrupt globalist body .
In conclusion , Beinart made sure to also play the race card in suggesting that America required such interventions in the past to end “ American slavery.
” These interventions , he claims , ultimately led to the adoption of the 15th Amendment , which calls for the “ elimination of civil , political and judicial distinctions based on race or color in all nations.
” According to Shane Trejo @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these openly treasonous calls for a U.S. takeover suggest that Democrats are less of a political party these days and more like “ an ISIS-style terror operation that will lay America to waste if they can ’ t control the country .
”

Peter Beinart, editor-at-large of Jewish Currents, recently penned an op-ed for The New York Times calling on the United Nations to stage an “international intervention” in order to stop Donald Trump from winning the Nov. 3 election.
by Ethan Huff
Echoing the sentiment expressed by George Soros operative Zack Ford, a queer atheist social justice warrior (SJW) who wants to “fix” America through a foreign invasion, Beinart believes that the only way to ensure the United States loses its sovereignty and is absorbed into the New World Order is to have the U.N. basically take over our country.
“No one knows how Donald Trump’s Covid-19 diagnosis will affect his presidential campaign, but before falling ill, he repeatedly suggested that he won’t accept the results of the election, should he lose,” Beinart falsely wrote.
In order to ensure that they win the Electoral College this time around, Democrats “must now win the popular vote by three, four or even five percentage points,” Beinart contends. “They must achieve that margin in the face of a strenuous Republican effort to ensure that many Democratic ballots are not counted.”
Citing “election-monitoring expert” Judith Kelley, dean of the Sanford School of Public Policy at Duke University, Beinart says President Trump’s behavior so far this year is enough to prompt international election observers to “go to countries and write up huge reports about (it) and say, ‘Red flag! Red flag!’”
Beinart’s proposed election interference is what Democrats falsely accused Trump of doing with Russia
Amazingly, Beinart openly proposes having international powers seize control of the U.S. through force if necessary.
This is exactly what Democrats have been falsely accusing the Trump campaign of doing with Russia, by the way.
He also supports efforts by Democrat operatives like John Podesta to steal the election for Joe Biden by urging “blue state” governors to overturn the results if they end up in favor of Trump.
Failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has likewise told Biden directly not to concede the election to Trump under any circumstances.
“Americans are not so inherently virtuous that they can safely disregard the moral discipline that international oversight provides,” Beinart goes on to write, suggesting that outside influence thwarting the election results would be a good thing for American virtues.
“Now that Mr. Biden and other white Democrats are tasting disenfranchisement themselves, they need to learn that lesson, too,” Beinart further contends.
Pope Francis, by the way, has called for similar U.S. absorption into the U.N., which is necessary in order to bring to fruition his New World Order agenda.
For good measure, the U.N. also recently appointed communist China to help lead a human rights panel on free speech, which tells us everything we need to know about this corrupt globalist body.
In conclusion, Beinart made sure to also play the race card in suggesting that America required such interventions in the past to end “American slavery.”
These interventions, he claims, ultimately led to the adoption of the 15th Amendment, which calls for the “elimination of civil, political and judicial distinctions based on race or color in all nations.”
According to Shane Trejo, writing for Big League Politics, these openly treasonous calls for a U.S. takeover suggest that Democrats are less of a political party these days and more like “an ISIS-style terror operation that will lay America to waste if they can’t control the country.”