humansarefree--2020-07-15--The Deep State is Using Divide So that We Can Be Conquered

“ In a fully developed bureaucracy there is nobody left with whom one can argue , to whom one can present grievances , on whom the pressures of power can be exerted .
“ Bureaucracy is the form of government in which everybody is deprived of political freedom , of the power to act ; for the rule by Nobody is not no-rule , and where all are equally powerless , we have a tyranny without a tyrant.
” ― Hannah Arendt , On Violence What exactly is going on ?
Is this revolution ?
Is this anarchy ?
Is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from the machinations of the police state ?
Is this a sociological means of re-setting our national equilibrium ?
Is this a Machiavellian scheme designed to further polarize the populace and undermine our efforts to stand unified against government tyranny ?
Is this so-called populist uprising actually a manufactured race war and election-year referendum on who should occupy the White House ?
Whatever it is , this — the racial hypersensitivity without racial justice , the kowtowing to politically correct bullies with no regard for anyone else ’ s free speech rights , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ brutality , the mob mindset that is overwhelming the rights of the individual , the oppressive glowering of the Nanny State , the seemingly righteous indignation full of sound and fury that in the end signifies nothing , the partisan divide that grows more impassable with every passing day — is not leading us anywhere good .
Certainly it ’ s not leading to more freedom .
This draconian exercise in how to divide , conquer and subdue a nation is succeeding .
It must be said : the Black Lives Matter protests @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , these protests—tinged with mob violence , rampant incivility , intolerance , and an arrogant disdain for how an open marketplace of ideas can advance freedom — have politicized what should never have been politicized : police brutality and the government ’ s ongoing assaults on our freedoms .
For one brief moment in the wake of George Floyd ’ s death , it seemed as if finally “ we the people ” might put aside our differences long enough to stand united in outrage over the government ’ s brutality .
That @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
We may be worse off now than we were before .
Suddenly , no one seems to be talking about any of the egregious governmental abuses that are still wreaking havoc on our freedoms : police shootings of unarmed individuals , invasive surveillance , roadside blood draws , roadside strip searches , SWAT team raids gone awry , the military industrial complex ’ s costly wars , pork barrel spending , pre-crime laws , civil asset forfeiture , fusion centers , militarization , armed drones , smart policing carried out by AI @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the police state , schools that function as indoctrination centers , bureaucrats that keep the Deep State in power .
The more things change , the more they stay the same .
How do you persuade a populace to embrace totalitarianism , that goose-stepping form of tyranny in which the government has all of the power and “ we the people ” have none ?
You persuade the people that the menace they face ( imaginary or not ) is so sinister , so overwhelming , so fearsome that the only way @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the government to take all necessary steps to quash it , even if that means allowing government jackboots to trample all over the Constitution .
This is how you use the politics of fear to persuade a freedom-endowed people to shackle themselves to a dictatorship .
It works the same way every time .
The government ’ s overblown , extended wars on terrorism , drugs , violence , illegal immigration , and so-called domestic extremism have been convenient ruses used to terrorize the populace into relinquishing more of their freedoms in exchange @ @ @ @ @ @ @ allowed our fears to be codified and our actions criminalized , we now find ourselves in a strange new world where just about everything we do is criminalized , even our ability to choose whether or not to wear a mask in public during the COVID-19 pandemic .
Strangely enough , in the face of outright corruption and incompetency on the part of our elected officials , Americans in general remain relatively gullible , eager to be persuaded that the government can solve the problems that plague us , whether it be terrorism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disaster , or a global pandemic .
We have relinquished control over the most intimate aspects of our lives to government officials who , while they may occupy seats of authority , are neither wiser , smarter , more in tune with our needs , more knowledgeable about our problems , nor more aware of what is really in our best interests .
Yet having bought into the false notion that the government does indeed know what ’ s best for us and can ensure not only our safety but our happiness and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to grave — that is , from daycare centers to nursing homes — we have in actuality allowed ourselves to be bridled and turned into slaves at the bidding of a government that cares little for our freedoms or our happiness .
The lesson is this : once a free people allows the government inroads into their freedoms or uses those same freedoms as bargaining chips for security , it quickly becomes a slippery slope to outright tyranny .
Nor does it seem to matter whether it ’ s a Democrat or a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the bureaucratic mindset on both sides of the aisle now seems to embody the same philosophy of authoritarian government , whose priorities are to milk “ we the people ” of our hard-earned money ( by way of taxes , fines and fees ) and remain in control and in power .
Modern government in general — ranging from the militarized police in SWAT team gear crashing through our doors to the rash of innocent citizens being gunned down by police to the invasive spying on everything we do — is acting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ own government no longer sees us as human beings with dignity and worth but as things to be manipulated , maneuvered , mined for data , manhandled by police , conned into believing it has our best interests at heart , mistreated , and then jails us if we dare step out of line , punishes us unjustly without remorse , and refuses to own up to its failings , we are no longer operating under a constitutional republic .
Instead , what we are experiencing is a pathocracy : tyranny at the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ operates against the interests of its own people except for favoring certain groups.
” So where does that leave us ?
Having allowed the government to expand and exceed our reach , we find ourselves on the losing end of a tug-of-war over control of our country and our lives .
And for as long as we let them , government officials will continue to trample on our rights , always justifying their actions as being for the good of the people .
Yet the government can only go as far as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Therein lies the problem .
The pickle we find ourselves in speaks volumes about the nature of the government beast we have been saddled with and how it views the rights and sovereignty of “ we the people.
” Now you don ’ t hear a lot about sovereignty anymore .
Sovereignty is a dusty , antiquated term that harkens back to an age when kings and emperors ruled with absolute power over a populace that had no rights .
Americans turned the idea of sovereignty on its head when they declared their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ absolute authority of King George III .
In doing so , Americans claimed for themselves the right to self-government and established themselves as the ultimate authority and power .
In other words , in America , “ we the people ” — sovereign citizens—call the shots .
So when the government acts , it is supposed to do so at our bidding and on our behalf , because we are the rulers .
That ’ s not exactly how it turned out , though , is it ?
In the 200-plus years since @ @ @ @ @ @ @ self-government , we have been steadily losing ground to the government ’ s brazen power grabs , foisted upon us in the so-called name of national security .
The government has knocked us off our rightful throne .
It has usurped our rightful authority .
It has staged the ultimate coup .
Its agents no longer even pretend that they answer to “ we the people.
” Worst of all , “ we the people ” have become desensitized to this constant undermining of our freedoms .
How do we reconcile the Founders @ @ @ @ @ @ @ entity whose only purpose is to serve the people with the police state ’ s insistence that the government is the supreme authority , that its power trumps that of the people themselves , and that it may exercise that power in any way it sees fit ( that includes government agents crashing through doors , mass arrests , ethnic cleansing , racial profiling , indefinite detentions without due process , and internment camps ) ?
They can not be reconciled .
They are polar opposites .
We are fast approaching a moment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to choose between the vision of what America was intended to be ( a model for self-governance where power is vested in the people ) and the reality of what it has become ( a police state where power is vested in the government ) .
This slide into totalitarianism — helped along by overcriminalization , government surveillance , militarized police , neighbors turning in neighbors , privatized prisons , and forced labor camps , to name just a few similarities — is tracking very closely with what happened in Germany in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rise to power .
We are walking a dangerous path right now .
No matter who wins the presidential election come November , it ’ s a sure bet that the losers will be the American people .
Despite what is taught in school and the propaganda that is peddled by the media , the 2020 presidential election is not a populist election for a representative .
Rather , it ’ s a gathering of shareholders to select the next CEO , a fact reinforced by the nation ’ s archaic electoral college @ @ @ @ @ @ @ election will bring about any real change in how the American government does business is either incredibly naïve , woefully out-of-touch , or oblivious to the fact that as an in-depth Princeton University study shows , we now live in an oligarchy that is “ of the rich , by the rich and for the rich.
” When a country spends close to $ 10 billion on elections to select what is , for all intents and purposes , a glorified homecoming king or queen to occupy the White House and fill other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ million of its people live in poverty , more than 40 million Americans are on unemployment , more than 500,000 Americans are homeless , and analysts forecast it will take a decade to work our way out of the current COVID-induced recession , that ’ s a country whose priorities are out of step with the needs of its people .
Be warned , however : the Establishment — the Deep State and its corporate partners that really run the show , pull the strings and dictate the policies , no matter who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ going to allow anyone to take office who will unravel their power structures .
Those who have attempted to do so in the past have been effectively put out of commission .
Voting sustains the illusion that we have a democratic republic , but it is merely a dictatorship in disguise , or what political scientists Martin Gilens and Benjamin Page more accurately refer to as an “ economic élite domination.
” In such an environment , the economic elite ( lobbyists , corporations , monied special interest groups ) dictate national policy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ indicates , our elected officials , especially those in the nation ’ s capital , represent the interests of the rich and powerful rather than the average citizen .
As such , the citizenry has little if any impact on the policies of government .
We have been saddled with a two-party system and fooled into believing that there ’ s a difference between the Republicans and Democrats , when in fact , the two parties are exactly the same .
As one commentator noted , both parties support endless war , engage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s basic rights , have no respect for the rule of law , are bought and paid for by Big Business , care most about their own power , and have a long record of expanding government and shrinking liberty We ’ re drowning under the weight of too much debt , too many wars , too much power in the hands of a centralized government run by a corporate elite , too many militarized police , too many laws , too many lobbyists , and generally too much bad news .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ our job as citizens begins and ends on Election Day .
They want us to believe that we have no right to complain about the state of the nation unless we ’ ve cast our vote one way or the other .
They want us to remain divided over politics , hostile to those with whom we disagree politically , and intolerant of anyone or anything whose solutions to what ails this country differ from our own .
What they don ’ t want us talking about is the fact that the government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the politicians don ’ t represent us , the electoral college is a joke , most of the candidates are frauds , and , as I point out in my book Battlefield America : The War on the American People , we as a nation are repeating the mistakes of history — namely , allowing a totalitarian state to reign over us .
Former concentration camp inmate Hannah Arendt warned against this when she wrote , “ Never has our future been more unpredictable , never have we depended so much on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to follow the rules of common sense and self-interest — forces that look like sheer insanity , if judged by the standards of other centuries.
” As we once again find ourselves faced with the prospect of voting for the lesser of two evils , “ we the people ” have a decision to make : do we simply participate in the collapse of the American republic as it degenerates toward a totalitarian regime , or do we take a stand and reject the pathetic excuse for government that is being fobbed off @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lesser of two evils is still evil .
By John W. Whitehead , founder and president of The Rutherford Institute .
His new book Battlefield America : The War on the American People is available at Amazon.com .

“In a fully developed bureaucracy there is nobody left with whom one can argue, to whom one can present grievances, on whom the pressures of power can be exerted.
“Bureaucracy is the form of government in which everybody is deprived of political freedom, of the power to act; for the rule by Nobody is not no-rule, and where all are equally powerless, we have a tyranny without a tyrant.” ― Hannah Arendt, On Violence
What exactly is going on?
Is this revolution? Is this anarchy? Is this a spectacle engineered to distract us from the machinations of the police state?
Is this a sociological means of re-setting our national equilibrium? Is this a Machiavellian scheme designed to further polarize the populace and undermine our efforts to stand unified against government tyranny?
Is this so-called populist uprising actually a manufactured race war and election-year referendum on who should occupy the White House?
Whatever it is, this — the racial hypersensitivity without racial justice, the kowtowing to politically correct bullies with no regard for anyone else’s free speech rights, the violent blowback after years of government-sanctioned brutality, the mob mindset that is overwhelming the rights of the individual, the oppressive glowering of the Nanny State, the seemingly righteous indignation full of sound and fury that in the end signifies nothing, the partisan divide that grows more impassable with every passing day — is not leading us anywhere good.
Certainly it’s not leading to more freedom.
This draconian exercise in how to divide, conquer and subdue a nation is succeeding.
It must be said: the Black Lives Matter protests have not helped. Inadvertently or intentionally, these protests—tinged with mob violence, rampant incivility, intolerance, and an arrogant disdain for how an open marketplace of ideas can advance freedom — have politicized what should never have been politicized: police brutality and the government’s ongoing assaults on our freedoms.
For one brief moment in the wake of George Floyd’s death, it seemed as if finally “we the people” might put aside our differences long enough to stand united in outrage over the government’s brutality.
That sliver of unity didn’t last.
We may be worse off now than we were before.
Suddenly, no one seems to be talking about any of the egregious governmental abuses that are still wreaking havoc on our freedoms: police shootings of unarmed individuals, invasive surveillance, roadside blood draws, roadside strip searches, SWAT team raids gone awry, the military industrial complex’s costly wars, pork barrel spending, pre-crime laws, civil asset forfeiture, fusion centers, militarization, armed drones, smart policing carried out by AI robots, courts that march in lockstep with the police state, schools that function as indoctrination centers, bureaucrats that keep the Deep State in power.
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
How do you persuade a populace to embrace totalitarianism, that goose-stepping form of tyranny in which the government has all of the power and “we the people” have none?
You persuade the people that the menace they face (imaginary or not) is so sinister, so overwhelming, so fearsome that the only way to surmount the danger is by empowering the government to take all necessary steps to quash it, even if that means allowing government jackboots to trample all over the Constitution.
This is how you use the politics of fear to persuade a freedom-endowed people to shackle themselves to a dictatorship.
It works the same way every time.
The government’s overblown, extended wars on terrorism, drugs, violence, illegal immigration, and so-called domestic extremism have been convenient ruses used to terrorize the populace into relinquishing more of their freedoms in exchange for elusive promises of security.
Having allowed our fears to be codified and our actions criminalized, we now find ourselves in a strange new world where just about everything we do is criminalized, even our ability to choose whether or not to wear a mask in public during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Strangely enough, in the face of outright corruption and incompetency on the part of our elected officials, Americans in general remain relatively gullible, eager to be persuaded that the government can solve the problems that plague us, whether it be terrorism, an economic depression, an environmental disaster, or a global pandemic.
We have relinquished control over the most intimate aspects of our lives to government officials who, while they may occupy seats of authority, are neither wiser, smarter, more in tune with our needs, more knowledgeable about our problems, nor more aware of what is really in our best interests.
Yet having bought into the false notion that the government does indeed know what’s best for us and can ensure not only our safety but our happiness and will take care of us from cradle to grave — that is, from daycare centers to nursing homes — we have in actuality allowed ourselves to be bridled and turned into slaves at the bidding of a government that cares little for our freedoms or our happiness.
The lesson is this: once a free people allows the government inroads into their freedoms or uses those same freedoms as bargaining chips for security, it quickly becomes a slippery slope to outright tyranny.
Nor does it seem to matter whether it’s a Democrat or a Republican at the helm anymore.
Indeed, the bureaucratic mindset on both sides of the aisle now seems to embody the same philosophy of authoritarian government, whose priorities are to milk “we the people” of our hard-earned money (by way of taxes, fines and fees) and remain in control and in power.
Modern government in general — ranging from the militarized police in SWAT team gear crashing through our doors to the rash of innocent citizens being gunned down by police to the invasive spying on everything we do — is acting illogically, even psychopathically.
(The characteristics of a psychopath include a “lack of remorse and empathy, a sense of grandiosity, superficial charm, conning and manipulative behavior, and refusal to take responsibility for one’s actions, among others.”)
When our own government no longer sees us as human beings with dignity and worth but as things to be manipulated, maneuvered, mined for data, manhandled by police, conned into believing it has our best interests at heart, mistreated, and then jails us if we dare step out of line, punishes us unjustly without remorse, and refuses to own up to its failings, we are no longer operating under a constitutional republic. Instead, what we are experiencing is a pathocracy: tyranny at the hands of a psychopathic government, which “operates against the interests of its own people except for favoring certain groups.”
So where does that leave us?
Having allowed the government to expand and exceed our reach, we find ourselves on the losing end of a tug-of-war over control of our country and our lives.
And for as long as we let them, government officials will continue to trample on our rights, always justifying their actions as being for the good of the people.
Yet the government can only go as far as “we the people” allow. Therein lies the problem.
The pickle we find ourselves in speaks volumes about the nature of the government beast we have been saddled with and how it views the rights and sovereignty of “we the people.”
Now you don’t hear a lot about sovereignty anymore. Sovereignty is a dusty, antiquated term that harkens back to an age when kings and emperors ruled with absolute power over a populace that had no rights.
Americans turned the idea of sovereignty on its head when they declared their independence from Great Britain and rejected the absolute authority of King George III. In doing so, Americans claimed for themselves the right to self-government and established themselves as the ultimate authority and power.
In other words, in America, “we the people”— sovereign citizens—call the shots.
So when the government acts, it is supposed to do so at our bidding and on our behalf, because we are the rulers.
That’s not exactly how it turned out, though, is it?
In the 200-plus years since we boldly embarked on this experiment in self-government, we have been steadily losing ground to the government’s brazen power grabs, foisted upon us in the so-called name of national security.
The government has knocked us off our rightful throne. It has usurped our rightful authority. It has staged the ultimate coup. Its agents no longer even pretend that they answer to “we the people.” Worst of all, “we the people” have become desensitized to this constant undermining of our freedoms.
How do we reconcile the Founders’ vision of the government as an entity whose only purpose is to serve the people with the police state’s insistence that the government is the supreme authority, that its power trumps that of the people themselves, and that it may exercise that power in any way it sees fit (that includes government agents crashing through doors, mass arrests, ethnic cleansing, racial profiling, indefinite detentions without due process, and internment camps)?
They cannot be reconciled. They are polar opposites.
We are fast approaching a moment of reckoning where we will be forced to choose between the vision of what America was intended to be (a model for self-governance where power is vested in the people) and the reality of what it has become (a police state where power is vested in the government).
This slide into totalitarianism — helped along by overcriminalization, government surveillance, militarized police, neighbors turning in neighbors, privatized prisons, and forced labor camps, to name just a few similarities — is tracking very closely with what happened in Germany in the years leading up to Hitler’s rise to power.
We are walking a dangerous path right now.
No matter who wins the presidential election come November, it’s a sure bet that the losers will be the American people.
Despite what is taught in school and the propaganda that is peddled by the media, the 2020 presidential election is not a populist election for a representative. Rather, it’s a gathering of shareholders to select the next CEO, a fact reinforced by the nation’s archaic electoral college system.
Anyone who believes that this election will bring about any real change in how the American government does business is either incredibly naïve, woefully out-of-touch, or oblivious to the fact that as an in-depth Princeton University study shows, we now live in an oligarchy that is “of the rich, by the rich and for the rich.”
When a country spends close to $10 billion on elections to select what is, for all intents and purposes, a glorified homecoming king or queen to occupy the White House and fill other government seats, while more than 40 million of its people live in poverty, more than 40 million Americans are on unemployment, more than 500,000 Americans are homeless, and analysts forecast it will take a decade to work our way out of the current COVID-induced recession, that’s a country whose priorities are out of step with the needs of its people.
Be warned, however: the Establishment — the Deep State and its corporate partners that really run the show, pull the strings and dictate the policies, no matter who occupies the Oval Office — is not going to allow anyone to take office who will unravel their power structures. Those who have attempted to do so in the past have been effectively put out of commission.
Voting sustains the illusion that we have a democratic republic, but it is merely a dictatorship in disguise, or what political scientists Martin Gilens and Benjamin Page more accurately refer to as an “economic élite domination.”
In such an environment, the economic elite (lobbyists, corporations, monied special interest groups) dictate national policy. As the Princeton University oligarchy study indicates, our elected officials, especially those in the nation’s capital, represent the interests of the rich and powerful rather than the average citizen. As such, the citizenry has little if any impact on the policies of government.
We have been saddled with a two-party system and fooled into believing that there’s a difference between the Republicans and Democrats, when in fact, the two parties are exactly the same.
As one commentator noted, both parties support endless war, engage in out-of-control spending, ignore the citizenry’s basic rights, have no respect for the rule of law, are bought and paid for by Big Business, care most about their own power, and have a long record of expanding government and shrinking liberty
We’re drowning under the weight of too much debt, too many wars, too much power in the hands of a centralized government run by a corporate elite, too many militarized police, too many laws, too many lobbyists, and generally too much bad news.
The powers-that-be want us to believe that our job as citizens begins and ends on Election Day. They want us to believe that we have no right to complain about the state of the nation unless we’ve cast our vote one way or the other. They want us to remain divided over politics, hostile to those with whom we disagree politically, and intolerant of anyone or anything whose solutions to what ails this country differ from our own.
What they don’t want us talking about is the fact that the government is corrupt, the system is rigged, the politicians don’t represent us, the electoral college is a joke, most of the candidates are frauds, and, as I point out in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, we as a nation are repeating the mistakes of history — namely, allowing a totalitarian state to reign over us.
Former concentration camp inmate Hannah Arendt warned against this when she wrote,
“Never has our future been more unpredictable, never have we depended so much on political forces that cannot be trusted to follow the rules of common sense and self-interest — forces that look like sheer insanity, if judged by the standards of other centuries.”
As we once again find ourselves faced with the prospect of voting for the lesser of two evils, “we the people” have a decision to make: do we simply participate in the collapse of the American republic as it degenerates toward a totalitarian regime, or do we take a stand and reject the pathetic excuse for government that is being fobbed off on us?
Never forget that the lesser of two evils is still evil.
By John W. Whitehead, founder and president of The Rutherford Institute. His new book Battlefield America: The War on the American People is available at Amazon.com.


humansarefree--2020-07-15--George Soros Foundation Announces ‘Doubling Down’ On Funding ‘Black-led Justice Organizations’

In an interview with the The New York Times , Open Society Foundations President Patrick Gaspard announced that the organisation , headed by billionaire George Soros , is to “ double down ” on funding “ black-led justice organizations ” .
The interview was accompanied by a press release from the Open Society declaring that “ The largest share of this support— $ 150 million—will be through a set of five-year grants to Black-led justice organizations that helped to create and now sustain the momentum towards racial equality.
” “ Open Society ’ s response reflects our conviction that real @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and letting leaders accountable to impacted communities shape the path forward.
” the release adds .
It also notes that another $ 70 million will be allocated to “ more immediate efforts to advance racial justice , ” which include efforts to “ reimagine ” policing .
Gaspard noted that the recent uprising in the US and across the world is “ the moment we ’ ve been investing in for the last 25 years.
” “ There is this call for justice in Black and brown communities , an explosion of not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” he claimed , adding that “ it ’ s time to double down.
” “ And we understood we can place a bet on these activists — Black and white — who see this as a moment of not just incrementalism , but whole-scale reform , ” Gaspard asserted .
Gaspard directly referenced the Black Lives Matter movement , staying that “ we need these moments to be sustained .
If we ’ re going to say ‘ Black lives matter , ’ we need to say ‘ Black organizations and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s bold admission will raise eyebrows given that just weeks ago anyone suggesting Soros ’ foundations were providing financial assistance to BLM agitators was labelled a ‘ conspiracy theorist ’ : Very important read : Yes , George Soros Sent Money To Fund The Riots — And So Did Taxpayers Indeed , Soros himself denied that his organisation was providing any funding to protests where violence occurred .

In an interview with the The New York Times, Open Society Foundations President Patrick Gaspard announced that the organisation, headed by billionaire George Soros, is to “double down” on funding “black-led justice organizations”.
The interview was accompanied by a press release from the Open Society declaring that “The largest share of this support—$150 million—will be through a set of five-year grants to Black-led justice organizations that helped to create and now sustain the momentum towards racial equality.”
“Open Society’s response reflects our conviction that real progress requires sustained support over many years and letting leaders accountable to impacted communities shape the path forward.” the release adds.
It also notes that another $70 million will be allocated to “more immediate efforts to advance racial justice,” which include efforts to “reimagine” policing.
Gaspard noted that the recent uprising in the US and across the world is “the moment we’ve been investing in for the last 25 years.”
“There is this call for justice in Black and brown communities, an explosion of not just sympathy but solidarity across the board,” he claimed, adding that “it’s time to double down.”
“And we understood we can place a bet on these activists — Black and white — who see this as a moment of not just incrementalism, but whole-scale reform,” Gaspard asserted.
Gaspard directly referenced the Black Lives Matter movement, staying that “we need these moments to be sustained. If we’re going to say ‘Black lives matter,’ we need to say ‘Black organizations and structures matter.’”
The Open Society’s bold admission will raise eyebrows given that just weeks ago anyone suggesting Soros’ foundations were providing financial assistance to BLM agitators was labelled a ‘conspiracy theorist’:
Wait, isn't this the same media that said it was a "conspiracy theory" Soros was funding BLM? https://t.co/UXQRplhaOK — Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) July 13, 2020
Very important read: Yes, George Soros Sent Money To Fund The Riots — And So Did Taxpayers
Indeed, Soros himself denied that his organisation was providing any funding to protests where violence occurred.
Source: Summit.news


humansarefree--2020-07-15--30 Facts About Covid-19

30 Facts About Covid-19

Fully referenced facts about Covid-19 , provided by experts in the field , to help our readers make a realistic risk assessment .
( Regular updates below ) “ The only means to fight the plague is honesty.
” – Albert Camus , 1947 • According to the latest immunological and serological studies , the overall lethality of Covid-19 ( IFR ) is about 0.1 % and thus in the range of a strong seasonal influenza ( flu ) .
• In countries like the US , the UK , and also Sweden ( without a lockdown ) , overall @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is in the range of a strong influenza season ; in countries like Germany , Austria and Switzerland , overall mortality is in the range of a mild influenza season .
• Even in global “ hotspots ” , the risk of death for the general population of school and working age is typically in the range of a daily car ride to work .
The risk was initially overestimated because many people with only mild or no symptoms were not taken into account .
• Up to 80 % of all test-positive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ year olds , about 60 % remain symptom-free .
Over 95 % of all persons develop at most moderate symptoms .
• Up to 60 % of all persons may already have a certain cellular background immunity to Covid-19 due to contact with previous coronaviruses ( i.e .
common cold viruses ) .
The initial assumption that there was no immunity against Covid-19 was not correct .
• The median age of the deceased in most countries ( including Italy ) is over 80 years ( e.g .
86 years in Sweden ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deceased had no serious preconditions .
The age and risk profile of deaths thus essentially corresponds to normal mortality .
• In many countries , up to two thirds of all extra deaths occurred in nursing homes , which do not benefit from a general lockdown .
Moreover , in many cases it is not clear whether these people really died from Covid19 or from weeks of extreme stress and isolation .
• Up to 30 % of all additional deaths may have been caused not by Covid19 , but by the effects @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
For example , the treatment of heart attacks and strokes decreased by up to 60 % because many patients no longer dared to go to hospital .
• Even in so-called “ Covid19 deaths ” it is often not clear whether they died from or with coronavirus ( i.e .
from underlying diseases ) or if they were counted as “ presumed cases ” and not tested at all .
However , official figures usually do not reflect this distinction .
• Many media reports of young and healthy people dying from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ many of these young people either did not die from Covid19 , they had already been seriously ill ( e.g .
from undiagnosed leukaemia ) , or they were in fact 109 instead of 9 years old .
The claimed increase in Kawasaki disease in children also turned out to be false .
• Strong increases in regional mortality can occur if there is a collapse in the care of the elderly and sick as a result of infection or panic , or if there are additional risk factors such as severe air @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the deceased sometimes led to additional bottlenecks in funeral or cremation services .
• In countries such as Italy and Spain , and to some extent the UK and the US , hospital overloads due to strong flu waves are not unusual .
Moreover , this year up to 15 % of health care workers were put into quarantine , even if they developed no symptoms .
• The often shown exponential curves of “ corona cases ” are misleading , as the number of tests also increased exponentially .
In most countries @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tests overall ( i.e .
the positive rate ) remained constant at 5 % to 25 % or increased only slightly .
In many countries , the peak of the spread was already reached well before the lockdown .
• Countries without lockdowns , such as Japan , South Korea , Belarus and Sweden , have not experienced a more negative course of events than many other countries .
Sweden was even praised by the WHO and now benefits from higher immunity compared to lockdown countries .
75 % of Swedish deaths happened @ @ @ @ @ @ @ protected fast enough .
• The fear of a shortage of ventilators was unjustified .
According to lung specialists , the invasive ventilation ( intubation ) of Covid19 patients , which is partly done out of fear of spreading the virus , is in fact often counterproductive and damaging to the lungs .
• Various studies have shown that the main routes of transmission of the virus are neither long-range aerosols ( i.e .
tiny particles floating in the air ) nor smear infections ( i.e .
on surfaces ) , but direct @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sneezing .
• The effectiveness of face masks in healthy and asymptomatic individuals remains questionable .
Experts warn that such masks may interfere with normal breathing and may become “ germ carriers ” .
Leading doctors called them a “ media hype ” and “ ridiculous ” .
• Many clinics in Europe and the US remained strongly underutilized or almost empty during the Covid19 peak and in some cases had to send staff home .
Millions of surgeries and therapies were cancelled , including many cancer screenings and organ transplants .
• @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the situation in hospitals , sometimes even with manipulative images and videos .
In general , the unprofessional reporting of many media maximized fear and panic in the population .
• The virus test kits used internationally are prone to errors and can produce false positive and false negative results .
Moreover , the official virus test was not clinically validated due to time pressure and may sometimes react positive to other coronaviruses .
• Numerous internationally renowned experts in the fields of virology , immunology and epidemiology consider the measures taken to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the general population and protection of risk groups .
• At no time was there a medical reason for the closure of schools , as the risk of disease and transmission in children is extremely low .
There is also no medical reason for small classes , masks or ‘ social distancing ’ rules in schools .
• The claim that only ( severe ) Covid-19 but not influenza may cause venous thrombosis and pulmonary ( lung ) embolism is not true , as it has been known for 50 years that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thrombosis and embolism , too .
• Several medical experts described express coronavirus vaccines as unnecessary or even dangerous .
Indeed , the vaccine against the so-called swine flu of 2009 , for example , led to sometimes severe neurological damage and lawsuits in the millions .
In the testing of new coronavirus vaccines , too , serious complications and failures have already occurred .
• A global respiratory disease pandemic can indeed extend over several seasons , but many studies of a “ second wave ” are based on very unrealistic assumptions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ illness and death across all age groups .
• In places like New York City , nurses described an oftentimes fatal medical mismanagement of Covid patients due to questionable financial incentives or inappropriate medical protocols .
On the other hand , early treatment with zinc and HCQ turned out to be effective after all .
• The number of people suffering from unemployment , depressions and domestic violence as a result of the measures has reached historic record values .
Several experts predict that the measures will claim far more lives than the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1.6 billion peoplearound the world are at immediate risk of losing their livelihood .
• NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden warned that the “ corona crisis ” will be used for the permanent expansion of global surveillance .
Renowned virologist Pablo Goldschmidt spoke of a “ global media terror ” and “ totalitarian measures ” .
Leading British virologist Professor John Oxford spoke of a “ media epidemic ” .
• More than 600 scientists have warned of an “ unprecedented surveillance of society ” through problematic apps for “ contact tracing ” .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ tracing ” is carried out directly by the secret service .
In several parts of the world , the population is being monitored by drones and facing serious police overreach during lockdowns .
• A 2019 WHO study on public health measures against pandemic influenza found that from a medical perspective , “ contact tracing ” is “ not recommended in any circumstances ” .
Nevertheless , contact tracing apps have already become partially mandatory in several countries .

Fully referenced facts about Covid-19, provided by experts in the field, to help our readers make a realistic risk assessment. (Regular updates below)
“The only means to fight the plague is honesty.” – Albert Camus, 1947
Overview
Continue reading: SWPRS.org


humansarefree--2020-07-16--Georgia Reopened First, And It’s Doing Fine, Thank You!

The first-to-reopen state maintains a Covid-19 death rate well below those of northeastern states—though you ’ d never know it from the media coverage .
The northeastern United States was badly ravaged by the Covid-19 pandemic .
The five states with the highest Covid-19 deaths per capita to date are New Jersey , New York , Connecticut , Massachusetts , and Rhode Island ; if the District of Columbia were a state , it would place sixth .
It is generally believed that public policies on social distancing , face coverings , contact tracing , and quarantine are critical in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state governments with access to the best public-health , medical , and political-science expertise would craft the best such policies .
One might also imagine that wealthier state governments would exercise such policies most robustly .
How surprising , then , to learn that the DC , Massachusetts , and the New York City metro area boast the highest-income citizenries in the nation .
Why did these areas , these national centers of government power ( Washington ) , financial might ( New York City ) , and academic prestige ( Boston ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ truism that it ’ s easier to spot the speck in someone else ’ s eye than the log in your own ; we have seen elite publications from each of these cultural capitals charge that poor , southern , and red states were committing their citizens to slaughter by not following the policy dictates of the northeastern mandarins , even as those policies seemingly failed .
On April 21 , the Washington Post called Georgia “ America ’ s No .
1 Death Destination.
” On April 29 , The Atlantic declared @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Experiment in Human Sacrifice.
” On April 30 , The New York Times was a bit stodgier , saying merely that Georgia had “ Screwed Up.
” After two months , though , Georgia remains open , and its Covid death rate stands at 27.2 per 100,000—well below the U.S. average of 39.7 per 100,000 , and eight times lower than the state of New Jersey .
This past weekend , the Times declared that Texas had “ Swaggered into a Coronavirus Disaster.
” The rate of death from Covid-19 in Texas @ @ @ @ @ @ @ state of New York , and 30 times less than the death rate of New York City .
Clearly , the elite media and its professional analysts profoundly misunderstand key aspects of the pandemic .
Why do they keep getting the wrong answers on Covid-19 policy , and what prevents them from making course corrections after two months of data contradict their predictions ?
Four months ago , based on my experience as a Canadian intensive-care unit physician , I argued in a British publication that lockdowns could not really prevent Covid from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but merely delay it .
That proportion would be the “ herd-immunity threshold ” —the percentage beyond which the virus would run out of fresh hosts .
Covid-19 causes death almost exclusively in the elderly and people with significant medical comorbidities .
Out of more than 18,000 confirmed Covid-19 deaths in New York City , only 28 were in healthy people under 45 .
Absent an effective vaccine or transformative treatment , and given the economic devastation of long-term lockdowns , why not focus public-health efforts going forward on the vulnerable , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , taking certain precautions ?
This is what Georgia has done .
Governor Brian Kemp lifted the statewide lockdown on April 30 but ordered persons over 65 and the “ medically fragile ” to continue sheltering in place .
This policy continued until June 11 , when healthy elders were let out .
Indeed , cases of Covid-19 have been increasing in Georgia since about June 11 , with a rapid upward inflection of the curve coincident with ongoing Black Lives Matter street protests and increased testing capacity .
If these new cases @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , or are a function of increased testing rates , we may hope that they will not yield an increase in daily Covid-19 deaths—and bring the state closer to herd immunity .
Why do prestigious media outlets continue to echo an obviously inaccurate analysis ?
It appears that every chapter of the Covid-19 story in the U.S. has been bent by the reality-distortion field of the presidential election in November .
On questions of hydroxychloroquine research , ventilator stockpiling , vaccine development , the effectiveness of face masks , and social distancing , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two non-overlapping opinion groups .
I can not find a consistent medical philosophy defining either group .
How can it be that hydroxychloroquine-credulity tracks closely with vaccine-skepticism ?
Why are face masks and social distancing considered crucially important—except when protesting police brutality ?
These questions should be answered by medical reality , not party politics .
Yet it appears that , at least among many commentators , party politics overwhelms scientific evidence .
President Trump , sometimes for baldly economic reasons , has favored reopening since late March .
Journalists in elite media @ @ @ @ @ @ @ him on this point , even as he later hedged his bets .
Neither the president ’ s vacillating anxieties nor the experts ’ opinions count for much once the data are in .
Georgia reopened first ; its sky has not fallen .
Let ’ s acknowledge this medical reality .

The first-to-reopen state maintains a Covid-19 death rate well below those of northeastern states—though you’d never know it from the media coverage.
by Matt S. Strauss
The northeastern United States was badly ravaged by the Covid-19 pandemic. The five states with the highest Covid-19 deaths per capita to date are New Jersey, New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island; if the District of Columbia were a state, it would place sixth.
It is generally believed that public policies on social distancing, face coverings, contact tracing, and quarantine are critical in preventing Covid-19 deaths.
One imagines that state governments with access to the best public-health, medical, and political-science expertise would craft the best such policies. One might also imagine that wealthier state governments would exercise such policies most robustly.
How surprising, then, to learn that the DC, Massachusetts, and the New York City metro area boast the highest-income citizenries in the nation.
Why did these areas, these national centers of government power (Washington), financial might (New York City), and academic prestige (Boston) do so poorly?
It is a truism that it’s easier to spot the speck in someone else’s eye than the log in your own; we have seen elite publications from each of these cultural capitals charge that poor, southern, and red states were committing their citizens to slaughter by not following the policy dictates of the northeastern mandarins, even as those policies seemingly failed.
On April 21, the Washington Post called Georgia “America’s No. 1 Death Destination.”
On April 29, The Atlantic declared the state’s early reopening an “Experiment in Human Sacrifice.” On April 30, The New York Times was a bit stodgier, saying merely that Georgia had “Screwed Up.”
After two months, though, Georgia remains open, and its Covid death rate stands at 27.2 per 100,000—well below the U.S. average of 39.7 per 100,000, and eight times lower than the state of New Jersey.
This past weekend, the Times declared that Texas had “Swaggered into a Coronavirus Disaster.” The rate of death from Covid-19 in Texas is nine times less than in the state of New York, and 30 times less than the death rate of New York City.
Clearly, the elite media and its professional analysts profoundly misunderstand key aspects of the pandemic. Why do they keep getting the wrong answers on Covid-19 policy, and what prevents them from making course corrections after two months of data contradict their predictions?
Four months ago, based on my experience as a Canadian intensive-care unit physician, I argued in a British publication that lockdowns could not really prevent Covid from infecting a proportion of the population, but merely delay it.
That proportion would be the “herd-immunity threshold”—the percentage beyond which the virus would run out of fresh hosts. Covid-19 causes death almost exclusively in the elderly and people with significant medical comorbidities.
Out of more than 18,000 confirmed Covid-19 deaths in New York City, only 28 were in healthy people under 45.
Absent an effective jjab or transformative treatment, and given the economic devastation of long-term lockdowns, why not focus public-health efforts going forward on the vulnerable, and allow young healthy people to resume life, taking certain precautions?
This is what Georgia has done. Governor Brian Kemp lifted the statewide lockdown on April 30 but ordered persons over 65 and the “medically fragile” to continue sheltering in place.
This policy continued until June 11, when healthy elders were let out.
Indeed, cases of Covid-19 have been increasing in Georgia since about June 11, with a rapid upward inflection of the curve coincident with ongoing Black Lives Matter street protests and increased testing capacity.
If these new cases are found predominantly in young healthy people, or are a function of increased testing rates, we may hope that they will not yield an increase in daily Covid-19 deaths—and bring the state closer to herd immunity.
Why do prestigious media outlets continue to echo an obviously inaccurate analysis? It appears that every chapter of the Covid-19 story in the U.S. has been bent by the reality-distortion field of the presidential election in November.
On questions of hydroxychloroquine research, ventilator stockpiling, jjab development, the effectiveness of face masks, and social distancing, American commentators seem to be split into two non-overlapping opinion groups. I cannot find a consistent medical philosophy defining either group.
How can it be that hydroxychloroquine-credulity tracks closely with jjab-skepticism? Why are face masks and social distancing considered crucially important—except when protesting police brutality?
These questions should be answered by medical reality, not party politics. Yet it appears that, at least among many commentators, party politics overwhelms scientific evidence.
President Trump, sometimes for baldly economic reasons, has favored reopening since late March. Journalists in elite media marshalled a chorus of experts to oppose him on this point, even as he later hedged his bets.
Neither the president’s vacillating anxieties nor the experts’ opinions count for much once the data are in. Georgia reopened first; its sky has not fallen. Let’s acknowledge this medical reality.


humansarefree--2020-07-16--Victims of Germany’s Pedophilia ‘Experiment’ About Their Nightmare: It ‘Was Like We Were Put Up For

Victims of Germany’s Pedophilia ‘Experiment’ About Their Nightmare: It ‘Was Like We Were Put Up For Sale’

Decades ago , they fought for survival every single day – now they have to motivate themselves to live .
RT listened to heartbreaking memories of two German men placed in the foster care of a known pedophile by Berlin authorities .
Last month , a damning report by Germany ’ s University of Hildesheim revealed that the Berlin Senate orchestrated a crackpot scheme that saw vulnerable children being placed in the care of known pedophiles for decades .
This was a part of a harrowing “ experiment ” by controversial sexologist Helmut Kentler , whose perverted teachings claimed that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to children .
Pedophiles taking care of them would only “ emancipate ” their “ sexuality , ” as Kentler repeatedly put it in countless books and on TV .
He earned fame as a “ progressive visionary ” and became the darling of left-wing politicians , including West Berlin Mayor Willy Brandt , the future German chancellor .
Two victims of Kentler ’ s “ experiment , ” identified as Marco and Sven , told RT that it “ was like we were being put up for sale.
” Their future foster @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be known in the German media , was kind and “ tried to win us over ” when they first met – perhaps like a hunter not wanting to scare away his prey .
“ He seemed to be friendly , unlike the real him .
Then it was whether he wanted to take us or not .
We were not asked , we simply had to go , ” Marco said .
For him , the years-long nightmare began in a hospital where he first met Fritz , who Kentler described @ @ @ @ @ @ @ care .
“ A month later I was in his care .
I didn ’ t even know I had been sent there , ” he revealed .
What the boys didn ’ t know either was that the man was actually a convicted pedophile who lived alone in West Berlin .
His criminal record didn ’ t stop the city youth welfare authorities from placing vulnerable children in his care on numerous occasions between the early 1970s and 2003 .
Fritz ’ s victims – some as young as six or seven @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mercy .
Several were sexually abused and raped , with one disabled boy dying in his care .
You can read more on the subject here and here .
Both Marco and Sven said living with the pedophile was “ a daily battle to survive.
” The “ total psychopath ” would viciously exploit their greatest fears to force them into doing “ things we wouldn ’ t normally do.
” It was ‘ If you don ’ t do this , you ’ ll go back to orphanage ’ or ‘ If @ @ @ @ @ @ @ want , you can eat rubbish out of the bin again.
’ The victims were told there was nothing criminal in the abuse as “ he is our father and we were young.
” Yelling and punching was part of the boys ’ everyday routine , which sometimes resembled the practices of an oppressive cult .
“ He always said he didn ’ t beat us but the devil in us , ” Marco said , adding that the physical violence tied them even stronger to their abuser .
Both men agreed that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more you felt this person was important to you ” – textbook tactics totalitarian sects are said to use on members .
Marco and Sven spent years in total isolation .
Fritz didn ’ t give them a proper education as he would have lost his caretaker status ; he also prevented them from acquiring basic social skills like paying bills or renting an apartment .
But there ’ s something more appalling that is “ buried deep in our subconscious , ” they say .
Every day you fight with yourself and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ live on .
When you lie in bed in the evening and these memories overwhelm you , sometimes you don ’ t want to live .
“ Our lives have been destroyed , we are unable to work and we have become aware that we are just a pile of misery , ” Marco said , with Sven adding bitterly , “ I was and am a product of a child molester.
” The two men tried to hold accountable those who they say were complicit in ruining their lives , namely , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they are now waging an uphill battle , it turns out .
The Senate tried to offer them €10,000 in compensation but seemed reluctant to press any charges .
Both victims are skeptical about the notorious report by the University of Hildesheim .
Their experts were approved by the Senate itself , which seems “ like a robber investigating his own robbery , ” Sven said .
He insisted there must be a further probe into “ one of the greatest crimes of the post-war era .
”

Decades ago, they fought for survival every single day – now they have to motivate themselves to live. RT listened to heartbreaking memories of two German men placed in the foster care of a known pedophile by Berlin authorities.
Last month, a damning report by Germany’s University of Hildesheim revealed that the Berlin Senate orchestrated a crackpot scheme that saw vulnerable children being placed in the care of known pedophiles for decades.
This was a part of a harrowing “experiment” by controversial sexologist Helmut Kentler, whose perverted teachings claimed that sexual contact with adults does no harm to children.
Pedophiles taking care of them would only “emancipate” their “sexuality,” as Kentler repeatedly put it in countless books and on TV.
He earned fame as a “progressive visionary” and became the darling of left-wing politicians, including West Berlin Mayor Willy Brandt, the future German chancellor.
Two victims of Kentler’s “experiment,” identified as Marco and Sven, told RT that it “was like we were being put up for sale.”
Their future foster father, Fritz H. as he came to be known in the German media, was kind and “tried to win us over” when they first met – perhaps like a hunter not wanting to scare away his prey.
“He seemed to be friendly, unlike the real him. Then it was whether he wanted to take us or not. We were not asked, we simply had to go,” Marco said.
For him, the years-long nightmare began in a hospital where he first met Fritz, who Kentler described as an “expert” in child care.
“A month later I was in his care. I didn’t even know I had been sent there,” he revealed.
What the boys didn’t know either was that the man was actually a convicted pedophile who lived alone in West Berlin.
His criminal record didn’t stop the city youth welfare authorities from placing vulnerable children in his care on numerous occasions between the early 1970s and 2003.
Fritz’s victims – some as young as six or seven – suffered unspeakable horrors while at his mercy. Several were sexually abused and raped, with one disabled boy dying in his care.
You can read more on the subject here and here.
Both Marco and Sven said living with the pedophile was “a daily battle to survive.” The “total psychopath” would viciously exploit their greatest fears to force them into doing “things we wouldn’t normally do.”
It was ‘If you don’t do this, you’ll go back to orphanage’ or ‘If you don’t do what I want, you can eat rubbish out of the bin again.’
The victims were told there was nothing criminal in the abuse as “he is our father and we were young.” Yelling and punching was part of the boys’ everyday routine, which sometimes resembled the practices of an oppressive cult.
“He always said he didn’t beat us but the devil in us,” Marco said, adding that the physical violence tied them even stronger to their abuser.
Both men agreed that “the worse the treatment, the more you felt this person was important to you” – textbook tactics totalitarian sects are said to use on members.
Marco and Sven spent years in total isolation. Fritz didn’t give them a proper education as he would have lost his caretaker status; he also prevented them from acquiring basic social skills like paying bills or renting an apartment. But there’s something more appalling that is “buried deep in our subconscious,” they say.
Every day you fight with yourself and have to motivate yourself to want to live on. When you lie in bed in the evening and these memories overwhelm you, sometimes you don’t want to live.
“Our lives have been destroyed, we are unable to work and we have become aware that we are just a pile of misery,” Marco said, with Sven adding bitterly, “I was and am a product of a child molester.”
The two men tried to hold accountable those who they say were complicit in ruining their lives, namely, executives of the Berlin Senate. But they are now waging an uphill battle, it turns out.
The Senate tried to offer them €10,000 in compensation but seemed reluctant to press any charges.
Both victims are skeptical about the notorious report by the University of Hildesheim.
Their experts were approved by the Senate itself, which seems “like a robber investigating his own robbery,” Sven said. He insisted there must be a further probe into “one of the greatest crimes of the post-war era.”
Source: RT.com


humansarefree--2020-07-16--Leaked Screenshots Suggest Twitter Maintains User ‘Blacklists’ Despite Denying Practice for Years

Leaked screenshots of Twitter ’ s internal systems indicate that the company keeps “ blacklists ” for users it deems undesirable , according to multiple reports .
The leaks followed the largest hack in the platform ’ s history .
The images , said to be screencaps of an internal control panel on the site ’ s back end , appear to show that Twitter marks user accounts with tags such as “ Trends Blacklist , ” “ Search Blacklist ” and “ Compromised.
” The visuals were first reported by Motherboard on Wednesday evening , soon followed up by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ obtained copies of the images .
Citing privacy violations , Twitter has reportedly scrambled to cleanse the site of posts featuring the screenshots .
Responding to the leaked images , the company claimed that it has always been upfront about the fact that tweets and accounts are monitored for “ quality ” and can be prevented from trending if found to be creating a “ bad search experience.
” However , critics noted that the screenshots suggest that this process can be done manually , opening the door to potential abuse .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not ‘ shadow ban ’ users – or limit the reach of accounts in lieu of an explicit ban – but the allegedly leaked images have generated a whirlwind of speculation that it does engage in the practice after all .
Conservative users in particular were up in arms over the reports , with right-leaning pundit Mike Cernovich accusing the company of editing content “ manually ” to weed out certain political viewpoints .
A company blog post in 2018 sought to assuage concerns and “ [ set ] the record straight ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , insisting flat-out “ we do not , ” however a subsequent rule change last December effectively wrote the practice into the platform ’ s policies .
Under the new terms , Twitter said it retained the right to “ limit distribution or visibility of any content on the service , ” though left it unclear exactly how it would accomplish that or when and where such limitations would be imposed .
The alleged screencaps emerged hours after the largest hack in Twitter ’ s history , sweeping up billionaires , celebrities , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be a far-reaching cryptocurrency scam .
While Twitter remained largely mum on the incident throughout most of Wednesday , later in the evening the company confirmed that its internal systems were indeed targeted in the massive breach , allowing the hackers to hijack a large number of accounts simultaneously through an employees-only control panel – presumably the same one featured in the screenshots .
“ We detected what we believe to be a coordinated social engineering attack by people who successfully targeted some of our employees with access to internal systems and tools @ @ @ @ @ @ @ statement , noting that it is still investigating what other illicit access the hackers might have had .

Leaked screenshots of Twitter’s internal systems indicate that the company keeps “blacklists” for users it deems undesirable, according to multiple reports.
The leaks followed the largest hack in the platform’s history.
The images, said to be screencaps of an internal control panel on the site’s back end, appear to show that Twitter marks user accounts with tags such as “Trends Blacklist,”“Search Blacklist” and “Compromised.”
The visuals were first reported by Motherboard on Wednesday evening, soon followed up by CNet, who also said it had obtained copies of the images.
Citing privacy violations, Twitter has reportedly scrambled to cleanse the site of posts featuring the screenshots.
Responding to the leaked images, the company claimed that it has always been upfront about the fact that tweets and accounts are monitored for “quality” and can be prevented from trending if found to be creating a “bad search experience.”
However, critics noted that the screenshots suggest that this process can be done manually, opening the door to potential abuse.
The platform has long maintained that it does not ‘shadow ban’ users – or limit the reach of accounts in lieu of an explicit ban – but the allegedly leaked images have generated a whirlwind of speculation that it does engage in the practice after all.
Conservative users in particular were up in arms over the reports, with right-leaning pundit Mike Cernovich accusing the company of editing content “manually” to weed out certain political viewpoints.
Twitters admin panel has a button to “blacklist trends.” So yeah twitter lied, they manually edit trends. The ones advocating violence are kept up. By their choice. They aren’t a platform. They are a publisher. Abolish Section 230. — Cernovich (@Cernovich) July 16, 2020
Incredibly smart of Twitter to label their politically explosive moderation tools “trends blacklist” and “search blacklist” — Joe Bernstein (@Bernstein) July 16, 2020
Excuse me, but what's up with that screenshot showing you have a "Search Blacklist" and "Trends Blacklist" button for Admins? And why is Twitter censoring anyone who tweets the screenshot? https://t.co/KgXg9tWNtd — Mark Dice (@MarkDice) July 16, 2020
BREAKING: Alleged leaked pictures from the Twitter admin control panel that was compromised showcase the buttons ‘Trends Blacklist’ and ‘Search Blacklist’, indicating Twitter DOES have the ability to shadowban it’s users. — Mike Coudrey (@MichaelCoudrey) July 16, 2020
A company blog post in 2018 sought to assuage concerns and “[set] the record straight” on whether it engages in shadow banning, insisting flat-out “we do not,” however a subsequent rule change last December effectively wrote the practice into the platform’s policies.
Under the new terms, Twitter said it retained the right to “limit distribution or visibility of any content on the service,” though left it unclear exactly how it would accomplish that or when and where such limitations would be imposed.
The alleged screencaps emerged hours after the largest hack in Twitter’s history, sweeping up billionaires, celebrities, politicians and corporations in what appeared to be a far-reaching cryptocurrency scam.
While Twitter remained largely mum on the incident throughout most of Wednesday, later in the evening the company confirmed that its internal systems were indeed targeted in the massive breach, allowing the hackers to hijack a large number of accounts simultaneously through an employees-only control panel – presumably the same one featured in the screenshots.
“We detected what we believe to be a coordinated social engineering attack by people who successfully targeted some of our employees with access to internal systems and tools,” the company said in a statement, noting that it is still investigating what other illicit access the hackers might have had.
Source: https://www.rt.com/news/494880-twitter-blacklist-leaked-images/


humansarefree--2020-07-16--NBC Doctor Who Claimed He Had Coronavirus LIED – the Whole Thing Was Staged

Back in May , Dr. Joseph Fair , a virologist who is often featured on NBC and MSNBC , claimed that he had contracted the Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) .
He was infamously seen lying in a hospital bed with breathing tubes up his nose , appearing to be suffering and in pain .
But there was just one problem : The whole thing was faked .
If you can even believe it , Dr. Fair pretended to have the Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) in order to scare the public into fearing this bogeyman contagion , as well @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to it .
But now the whole thing has been blown wide open as a hoax .
According to Dr. Fair ’ s own recent admission , he actually tested negative for the Wuhan coronavirus on multiple occasions , but still supposedly believed that he had it .
Dr. Fair also tested negative after taking an antibody test , further confirming that he did not have the novel virus .
But none of this stopped him from tweeting that he had come down with the Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) , supposedly causing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ I ’ m on the other end of it , but not out of the woods yet , ” he wrote alongside a “ selfie ” picture of him with a ventilator over his nose and mouth .
“ Please continue to social distance .
I used max precautions , but still managed to contract it .
Back as soon as I ’ m able , friends , ” he further wrote , concluding with , “ # StaySafe.
” Six days after being admitted to the hospital with what appears to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s syndrome , Dr. Fair was released with oxygen .
He thanked both NBC and MSNBC for their support , as well as his friends , family members , and various celebrities and fake news reporters for their prayers , messages , and faxes .
“ Home to convalesce , but back as soon as my body permits , ” he joked .
How many “ COVID cases ” are really just Munchausen ’ s syndrome ?
Not even a month later , Dr. Fair took to Twitter once again , this time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about his supposed Wuhan coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) diagnosis .
While he still claims to have believed that he contracted the virus , Dr. Fair now admits that he never actually tested positive .
“ My undiagnosed / suspected COVID illness from nearly 2 months ago remains an undiagnosed mystery as a recent antibody test was negative , ” he wrote .
“ I had myriad COVID symptoms , was hospitalized in a COVID ward & treated for COVID-related co-morbidities , despite testing negative by nasal swab.
” Hilariously , this latter tweet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ retweets than his earlier one , which is probably due to the fact that Dr. Fair ’ s followers are now feeling as though they were sold a tall tale – which they were .
Dr. Fair followed up this tweet with yet another , which received even fewer likes and retweets .
It reads : “ I am so grateful to you all for the ongoing support in my recovery .
I am feeling back to normal & am thankful for my health , & to my caregivers for getting me through @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for those in care for COVID , about which we have yet so much to learn.
” Chances are that Dr. Fair was never actually sick .
It was more than likely all in his head , possibly due to the media ’ s endless fear-mongering about this so-called pandemic , almost none of which seems to be panning out in the way we were told it would .
“ I think the real story here is that he was in a COVID ward for six days and still never contracted it , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ making an interesting point .
“ Not only that , he blocked a legitimate CCP virus victim from that bed and life-saving treatment , ” responded another .

Back in May, Dr. Joseph Fair, a virologist who is often featured on NBC and MSNBC, claimed that he had contracted the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19).
He was infamously seen lying in a hospital bed with breathing tubes up his nose, appearing to be suffering and in pain. But there was just one problem: The whole thing was faked.
by Ethan Huff
If you can even believe it, Dr. Fair pretended to have the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) in order to scare the public into fearing this bogeyman contagion, as well as accepting the government’s response to it. But now the whole thing has been blown wide open as a hoax.
According to Dr. Fair’s own recent admission, he actually tested negative for the Wuhan coronavirus on multiple occasions, but still supposedly believed that he had it.
Dr. Fair also tested negative after taking an antibody test, further confirming that he did not have the novel virus.
But none of this stopped him from tweeting that he had come down with the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19), supposedly causing him to have to be hospitalized.
“I’m on the other end of it, but not out of the woods yet,” he wrote alongside a “selfie” picture of him with a ventilator over his nose and mouth.
“Please continue to social distance. I used max precautions, but still managed to contract it. Back as soon as I’m able, friends,” he further wrote, concluding with, “#StaySafe.”
Six days after being admitted to the hospital with what appears to have been a case of Munchausen’s syndrome, Dr. Fair was released with oxygen.
He thanked both NBC and MSNBC for their support, as well as his friends, family members, and various celebrities and fake news reporters for their prayers, messages, and faxes.
“Home to convalesce, but back as soon as my body permits,” he joked.
How many “COVID cases” are really just Munchausen’s syndrome?
Not even a month later, Dr. Fair took to Twitter once again, this time to fess up that he had fibbed about his supposed Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) diagnosis.
While he still claims to have believed that he contracted the virus, Dr. Fair now admits that he never actually tested positive.
“My undiagnosed / suspected COVID illness from nearly 2 months ago remains an undiagnosed mystery as a recent antibody test was negative,” he wrote.
“I had myriad COVID symptoms, was hospitalized in a COVID ward & treated for COVID-related co-morbidities, despite testing negative by nasal swab.”
Hilariously, this latter tweet received far fewer “likes” and retweets than his earlier one, which is probably due to the fact that Dr. Fair’s followers are now feeling as though they were sold a tall tale – which they were.
Dr. Fair followed up this tweet with yet another, which received even fewer likes and retweets. It reads:
“I am so grateful to you all for the ongoing support in my recovery. I am feeling back to normal & am thankful for my health, & to my caregivers for getting me through it. I hope the same outcome for those in care for COVID, about which we have yet so much to learn.”
Chances are that Dr. Fair was never actually sick. It was more than likely all in his head, possibly due to the media’s endless fear-mongering about this so-called pandemic, almost none of which seems to be panning out in the way we were told it would.
“I think the real story here is that he was in a COVID ward for six days and still never contracted it,” wrote one Breitbart News commenter, making an interesting point.
“Not only that, he blocked a legitimate CCP virus victim from that bed and life-saving treatment,” responded another.


humansarefree--2020-07-16--Life as We Know it May Soon be Over and Replaced by the New World Order

A small news report by Bloomberg earlier this week and published on MSN Money went mostly unnoticed in the corporate media , and even in the alternative media , and yet it might have been the most significant news story so far this year .
The Bank of England is reviewing whether it should create a central bank-backed digital currency , according to governor Andrew Bailey .
“ We are looking at the question of , should we create a Bank of England digital currency , ” Bailey said Monday in a webinar event with students .
“ We ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as it does have huge implications on the nature of payments and society .
I think in a few years time , we will be heading toward some sort of digital currency , ” he added .
The BOE is part of a group of major central banks teaming up to assess potentially developing their own digital currencies , acknowledging their role is being challenged by new technologies and private sector initiatives such as Facebook Inc. ’ s Libra .
It could be some time before the U.K. central bank is able to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ development , however .
“ The digital currency issue will be a very big issue , ” Bailey said .
“ I hope it is , because that means Covid will be behind us.
” ( Source ) COVID , of course , will probably never be “ behind us , ” as we are seeing today that it is being used as an excuse to destroy jobs and small businesses and complete the transfer of wealth from the middle classes to the Globalists .
It is working so well for them , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we should be very skeptical of governor Andrew Bailey ’ s statement that a Bank of England digital currency is still “ a few years ” away .
Why is a Central Bank Digital Currency Such a Big Deal ?
At this point I am sure that those still reading this article are accusing me of sensationalism and “ click bait ” by making the claim in the headline of this article that when cash is replaced by a digital currency , that life as we know it will be over and replaced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all , most of us already use digital payments for most of our transactions in life , and cash is seldom used these days anyway , so what ’ s the big deal ?
The “ big deal ” is that all of the digital transactions that you use today to pay for goods and services , still draw upon financial resources represented by the currency you hold in your own bank account , and you have relative freedom to choose how , when , and where you are going to spend your @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you still have choices .
You still have some freedoms .
If you don ’ t like the interest rates your credit card charges you , for example , you can choose to move to a different credit card company .
If you don ’ t like the way your bank is treating you , you can choose to hold your accounts in a different bank that offers better rates , fewer fees , etc .
And if you don ’ t have good credit and do not qualify for a credit card @ @ @ @ @ @ @ marketplace with cash .
You can also issue checks to someone to move your cash around should you so choose to do so without using digital payments .
And if you don ’ t like the fact that your local store now requires you to wear a mask to shop there ?
Not a huge problem , as most likely everything they sell you can order online in the comfort of your home and have it delivered to you anyway .
You still have choices .
But if the Central Bankers get their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with a single digital currency , you could lose ALL of these choices , and personal privacy will be almost completely gone !
Do you think that once a mandatory COVID vaccine comes out , that you can just decide not to participate ?
It won ’ t be so easy if there is a single digital currency that replaces all other currencies .
Your ability to participate in the marketplace , even from the “ comfort ” of your own prison cell home , will be 100 % dependent on whether or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in using the new digital currency , even if you have a positive ledger in “ your ” account .
So just think about the ramifications if your account in the Central Banks of the new digital currency system has not approved you for transactions because you do not have a COVID digital ID card showing you have been properly vaccinated with an approved COVID vaccine ?
You can ’ t go to a store to purchase anything , and you can not purchase anything online either .
What are you going to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of questions you and your friends and family members need to start asking NOW , while you still have some freedoms left .
Trial Run on Digital Currency Happening NOW in Africa And if you think this is fear mongering and that something like this would probably not happen for many years anyway , it is actually happening right now in Africa as a trial run .
Raul Diego published an article this week in Mint Press News titled : Africa to Become Testing Ground for “ Trust Stamp ” Vaccine Record and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ platform partnered with the Gates-funded GAVI vaccine alliance and Mastercard will launch in West Africa and combine COVID-19 vaccinations , cashless payments , and potential law enforcement applications .
A biometric digital identity platform that “ evolves just as you evolve ” is set to be introduced in “ low-income , remote communities ” in West Africa thanks to a public-private partnership between the Bill Gates-backed GAVI vaccine alliance , Mastercard and the AI-powered “ identity authentication ” company , Trust Stamp .
The program , which was first launched in late 2018 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ digital identity platform integrated into the GAVI-Mastercard “ Wellness Pass , ” a digital vaccination record and identity system that is also linked to Mastercard ’ s click-to-play system that powered by its AI and machine learning technology called NuData .
Mastercard , in addition to professing its commitment to promoting “ centralized record keeping of childhood immunization ” also describes itself as a leader toward a “ World Beyond Cash , ” and its partnership with GAVI marks a novel approach towards linking a biometric digital identity system , vaccination records , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cohesive platform .
The effort , since its launch nearly two years ago , has been funded via $ 3.8 million in GAVI donor funds in addition to a matched donation of the same amount by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation .
In early June , GAVI reported that Mastercard ’ s Wellness Pass program would be adapted in response to the coronavirus ( COVID-19 ) pandemic .
Around a month later , Mastercard announced that Trust Stamp ’ s biometric identity platform would be integrated into Wellness Pass as Trust Stamp @ @ @ @ @ @ @ biometric identity in areas of the world lacking internet access or cellular connectivity and also does not require knowledge of an individual ’ s legal name or identity to function .
The Wellness Program involving GAVI , Mastercard , and Trust Stamp will soon be launched in West Africa and will be coupled with a Covid-19 vaccination program once a vaccine becomes available .
( Full article ) This follows an announcement published a few weeks ago that Visa had filed a U.S. patent on digital currency .
Visa is one of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the world .
Where the powerhouse enterprise places its efforts is thus no small matter .
That ’ s why a newly published patent application for a blockchain-powered “ digital fiat currency ” system by the payments giant is not only legitimizing for blockchain tech in general but also indicates what may be coming to the mainstream payments arena amid increasing hyperdigitalization .
On Thursday , May 14th , the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ( USPTO ) published the patent application in question , which is simply titled “ DIGITAL FIAT CURRENCY.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ submitted to the USPTO in November 2018 , outlines a stablecoin-like system in which blockchain-based digital currency issuances are linked to actual fiat currency reserves .
( Full Article ) This is the REAL War !
Central Bankers vs. Free Citizens As I have been publishing and warning for months now , there is a plan in place that is behind everything that is happening today at “ warp speed , ” and that plan is to usher in a New World Order .
This is not a “ conspiracy theory ” anymore @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our very eyes .
The battles we are witnessing on streets and online pitting Republicans against Democrats , whites versus blacks , socialists versus capitalists , etc.
, are all a distraction to the REAL war , which is the masses against the Global Satanic Bankers .
And if a large enough percentage of the American public doesn ’ t wake up soon and realize who the real enemies are , this country will be totally lost to the Globalists .
Not to the Communists , not to the White Supremacists , but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sides to achieve their purpose of a New World Order with a significantly reduced population that can be controlled by a single currency , a single government , and a single religion .
So if you haven ’ t been paying attention yet , it is time to get caught up .
Here are the past articles you need to read to give more context and understanding .
Pay attention to the links and the accompanying videos in these articles as well .

A small news report by Bloomberg earlier this week and published on MSN Money went mostly unnoticed in the corporate media, and even in the alternative media, and yet it might have been the most significant news story so far this year.
Jill Ward from Bloomberg wrote:
The Bank of England is reviewing whether it should create a central bank-backed digital currency, according to governor Andrew Bailey.
“We are looking at the question of, should we create a Bank of England digital currency,” Bailey said Monday in a webinar event with students. “We’ll go on looking at it, as it does have huge implications on the nature of payments and society. I think in a few years time, we will be heading toward some sort of digital currency,” he added.
The BOE is part of a group of major central banks teaming up to assess potentially developing their own digital currencies, acknowledging their role is being challenged by new technologies and private sector initiatives such as Facebook Inc.’s Libra.
It could be some time before the U.K. central bank is able to fully devote its attention to such a development, however.
“The digital currency issue will be a very big issue,” Bailey said. “I hope it is, because that means Covid will be behind us.” (Source)
COVID, of course, will probably never be “behind us,” as we are seeing today that it is being used as an excuse to destroy jobs and small businesses and complete the transfer of wealth from the middle classes to the Globalists.
It is working so well for them, why would they stop now?
So we should be very skeptical of governor Andrew Bailey’s statement that a Bank of England digital currency is still “a few years” away.
Why is a Central Bank Digital Currency Such a Big Deal?
At this point I am sure that those still reading this article are accusing me of sensationalism and “click bait” by making the claim in the headline of this article that when cash is replaced by a digital currency, that life as we know it will be over and replaced by a New World Order.
After all, most of us already use digital payments for most of our transactions in life, and cash is seldom used these days anyway, so what’s the big deal?
The “big deal” is that all of the digital transactions that you use today to pay for goods and services, still draw upon financial resources represented by the currency you hold in your own bank account, and you have relative freedom to choose how, when, and where you are going to spend your money.
In other words, today you still have choices. You still have some freedoms.
If you don’t like the interest rates your credit card charges you, for example, you can choose to move to a different credit card company. If you don’t like the way your bank is treating you, you can choose to hold your accounts in a different bank that offers better rates, fewer fees, etc.
And if you don’t have good credit and do not qualify for a credit card, you can still participate in the marketplace with cash. You can also issue checks to someone to move your cash around should you so choose to do so without using digital payments.
And if you don’t like the fact that your local store now requires you to wear a mask to shop there? Not a huge problem, as most likely everything they sell you can order online in the comfort of your home and have it delivered to you anyway.
You still have choices.
But if the Central Bankers get their way and replace all cash and currencies with a single digital currency, you could lose ALL of these choices, and personal privacy will be almost completely gone!
Do you think that once a mandatory COVID jjab comes out, that you can just decide not to participate?
It won’t be so easy if there is a single digital currency that replaces all other currencies.
Your ability to participate in the marketplace, even from the “comfort” of your own prison cell home, will be 100% dependent on whether or not you meet the qualifications to participate in using the new digital currency, even if you have a positive ledger in “your” account.
So just think about the ramifications if your account in the Central Banks of the new digital currency system has not approved you for transactions because you do not have a COVID digital ID card showing you have been properly vaccinated with an approved COVID jjab?
You can’t go to a store to purchase anything, and you cannot purchase anything online either.
What are you going to do now?
Those are the kinds of questions you and your friends and family members need to start asking NOW, while you still have some freedoms left.
Trial Run on Digital Currency Happening NOW in Africa
And if you think this is fear mongering and that something like this would probably not happen for many years anyway, it is actually happening right now in Africa as a trial run.
Raul Diego published an article this week in Mint Press News titled: Africa to Become Testing Ground for “Trust Stamp” Vaccine Record and Payment System.
A new biometric identity platform partnered with the Gates-funded GAVI jjab alliance and Mastercard will launch in West Africa and combine COVID-19 vaccinations, cashless payments, and potential law enforcement applications.
A biometric digital identity platform that “evolves just as you evolve” is set to be introduced in “low-income, remote communities” in West Africa thanks to a public-private partnership between the Billy Boy-backed GAVI jjab alliance, Mastercard and the AI-powered “identity authentication” company, Trust Stamp.
The program, which was first launched in late 2018, will see Trust Stamp’s digital identity platform integrated into the GAVI-Mastercard “Wellness Pass,” a digital vaccination record and identity system that is also linked to Mastercard’s click-to-play system that powered by its AI and machine learning technology called NuData.
Mastercard, in addition to professing its commitment to promoting “centralized record keeping of childhood immunization” also describes itself as a leader toward a “World Beyond Cash,” and its partnership with GAVI marks a novel approach towards linking a biometric digital identity system, vaccination records, and a payment system into a single cohesive platform.
The effort, since its launch nearly two years ago, has been funded via $3.8 million in GAVI donor funds in addition to a matched donation of the same amount by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
In early June, GAVI reported that Mastercard’s Wellness Pass program would be adapted in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.
Around a month later, Mastercard announced that Trust Stamp’s biometric identity platform would be integrated into Wellness Pass as Trust Stamp’s system is capable of providing biometric identity in areas of the world lacking internet access or cellular connectivity and also does not require knowledge of an individual’s legal name or identity to function.
The Wellness Program involving GAVI, Mastercard, and Trust Stamp will soon be launched in West Africa and will be coupled with a Covid-19 vaccination program once a jjab becomes available. (Full article)
This follows an announcement published a few weeks ago that Visa had filed a U.S. patent on digital currency.
Visa is one of the most successful and consequential payments companies in the world. Where the powerhouse enterprise places its efforts is thus no small matter.
That’s why a newly published patent application for a blockchain-powered “digital fiat currency” system by the payments giant is not only legitimizing for blockchain tech in general but also indicates what may be coming to the mainstream payments arena amid increasing hyperdigitalization.
On Thursday, May 14th, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published the patent application in question, which is simply titled “DIGITAL FIAT CURRENCY.”
The filing, which was first submitted to the USPTO in November 2018, outlines a stablecoin-like system in which blockchain-based digital currency issuances are linked to actual fiat currency reserves. (Full Article)
This is the REAL War! Central Bankers vs. Free Citizens
As I have been publishing and warning for months now, there is a plan in place that is behind everything that is happening today at “warp speed,” and that plan is to usher in a New World Order.
This is not a “conspiracy theory” anymore, because the plan is unfolding before our very eyes.
The battles we are witnessing on streets and online pitting Republicans against Democrats, whites versus blacks, socialists versus capitalists, etc., are all a distraction to the REAL war, which is the masses against the Global Satanic Bankers.
And if a large enough percentage of the American public doesn’t wake up soon and realize who the real enemies are, this country will be totally lost to the Globalists.
Not to the Communists, not to the White Supremacists, but to the Global Bankers who fund both sides to achieve their purpose of a New World Order with a significantly reduced population that can be controlled by a single currency, a single government, and a single religion.
So if you haven’t been paying attention yet, it is time to get caught up.
Here are the past articles you need to read to give more context and understanding. Pay attention to the links and the accompanying videos in these articles as well.
By Brian Shilhavy, Guest writer