humansarefree--2020-09-29--COVID-19: Trigger for a New Social Order

I can remember them saying that ‘ everything changed after 9/11 ’ .
It did , but certainly not for the better .
I think we can all agree on that .
I remember how everyone surrendered their rights and key aspects of democracy , all in the name of ‘ keeping us safe ’ .
Back then , world-changing decisions were made in reaction to an exaggerated threat , with sweeping ‘ emergency measures ’ and laws enacted .
Usually , nothing good follows from a government that is making decisions and formulating permanent policy , suspending constitutions and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a population operating from a position of fear .
That much we did learn .
Some of us did anyway .
In January , like a leviathan sprung forth from the titans Oceanus and Ceto in ancient Greece , the global coronavirus pandemic was born .
Like 9/11 , it was a disruptive event , but this time on a scale unimaginable .
Whether or not one believes this was naturally-occurring or a biologically-engineered pathogen ( there is every reason to believe it could be ) , it is beyond argument that this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ used to advance a multi-pronged globalist agenda , likely to feature more wars between the great powers .
Modern man is now entering realms of dystopia only imagined before by the likes of Aldous Huxley and George Orwell , with more than a hint of Philip K. Dick .
What makes all of this difficult for so many is that the sudden transition has been almost instantaneous , leaving people in a near callow state of bewilderment , wondering what just happened to their old life .
No matter which way this situation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ life will never be the same .
By now we should be familiar with the story : a novel coronavirus , scientifically known as SARS-CoV-2 , or COVID-19 , has made its way across the planet , infecting millions of people and registering over 100,000 deaths ( as of the time of writing ) across 180 countries .
The victims of this outbreak are overwhelming elderly persons over the age of 70 and those in palliative care , most of who have severe and chronic underlying medical conditions .
Make no mistake about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on a scale the modern world has never seen before .
The shock and awe began from the moment the story broke from the Chinese city of Wuhan in Hubei Province .
Global audiences were inundated with images of Chinese authorities putting hundreds of people into biological suits , hosing down the outside of buildings , before quarantining themselves in their apartments .
Then began a state-sanctioned medieval-style program that western media and politicians enthusiastically dubbed a “ lockdown , ” a term aptly borrowed from the prison industrial complex .
Wuhan was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ western psyche , such that when the coronavirus made it to European and North American shores , the public was already conditioned to expect a Chinese-style response from their own governments .
Not surprisingly , this is exactly what they got and , in fact , it was what they demanded .
On 12 March , British Prime Minister Boris Johnson called an emergency press conference where he took to the podium , flanked by his two leading science advisors , Sir Patrick Vallace and Chris Whitty , who proceeded to explain the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ around the commonly known epidemiological concept of “ herd immunity.
” Their strategy was a familiar one because it has been the orthodoxy in modern epidemiology – allow a virus to go through approximately 60-80 % of the population in order to achieve herd immunity , naturally extinguishing the virus in a single season .
But Johnson made the fatal error of grossly overestimating the death rate at 1 % of the total infected , an estimate that would have left the country with some 52 million infected and 500,000 fatalities .
Of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were pure fiction , but at the time everyone was so enveloped in fear that they believed the ‘ experts ’ .
Nonetheless , the herd immunity approach was more or less identical to the ‘ no lockdown ’ approach taken by European countries Sweden and Iceland , as well as Belarus , Mexico , and Japan .
This would entail standard random sample testing nationally and for those exhibiting COVID-19 symptoms .
The elderly and vulnerable people would be told to self-isolate for a period of time while studies were conducted .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ last long .
On 24 March , Johnson appeared on national TV , this time without his science team , to announce a nationwide lockdown – an effective shutdown of society and most of the country ’ s economy .
The UK was now following fellow NATO member states France , Italy , Spain and others , which had already imposed draconian national lockdowns , including strict new ‘ social distancing ’ guidelines preventing people from being together .
It appeared that Johnson ’ s sudden 180º degree turn was prompted in part @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the government ‘ expert ’ teams at Imperial College London , led by controversial computer modeler Neil Ferguson who was previously responsible for the 2001 ‘ Foot and Mouth ’ crisis , a debacle which ended in the unnecessary culling of some six million livestock in Britain .
This time , Ferguson and his team worked their modelling magic to come up with an estimated half a million coronavirus deaths if the government did not implement “ very intense social distancing and other interventions now in place.
” While the figure was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it , as did government officials , which fuelled fear and panic across Britain ’ s government-media complex .
Frightened and unsure , the public accepted the authoritarian measures , but the government never gave an end date to the quarantine ; it was left open-ended at the discretion of the government ’ s scientific coterie .
Once that bubble of fear had been sufficiently inflated , a medieval-style lockdown was a fait accompli in numerous countries including Australia and New Zealand .
The impact of a full national quarantine is yet unknown @ @ @ @ @ @ @ clear that it will be nothing short of cataclysmic for those countries who agreed to the voluntary self-destruction of their economies and the indefinite suspension of democracy .
It ’ s worth noting this isn ’ t the first time the United Nations , the World Health Organization ( WHO ) , and Imperial College tried conjuring a global panic over a flu virus .
Back in 2005 , the “ range of deaths , ” the UN warned of bird flu virus H5N1 , “ could be anything between five and 150 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s most reliable doomsayer , Neil Ferguson , to help come up with another completely fictional death toll of 200 million people .
His high school level math equation was breathtaking in its over-simplicity : “ Around 40 million people died in the 1918 Spanish flu outbreak , ” said Prof. Ferguson .
“ There are six times more people on the planet now so you could scale it up to around 200 million people probably.
” That doomsday prediction led to the culling of tens of millions of birds in Southeast @ @ @ @ @ @ @ materialised .
In the end , human fatalities numbered in the hundreds worldwide .
It was a non event .
Similar unremarkable numbers followed the global hype over the H1N1 swine flu in 2009 .
Thanks to the work of investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson , the Center for Disease Control ( CDC ) in the US was caught over-inflating the number of cases – a fraudulent move that had grave implications for government policy and stoking unfounded public fear .
With COVID-19 , the globalist medical industrial complex , led by WHO , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ campaigns by hyping the novel coronavirus as the next Spanish Flu .
This time they were given an extraordinary opportunity thanks to China which put on an incredible media performance and ‘ show of strength ’ in the month of January by ‘ locking down ’ Wuhan – inspiring western and other leaders to try the same big government approach .
However , the results would turn out economically disastrous for western ‘ lockdown ’ countries .
All of this is certain to trigger a protracted global recession marked by at least 12 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and social displacement the likes of which the world has never seen before .
The decision by countries like the UK , France , Italy , Canada , Australia , New Zealand and the US to voluntarily implode their economies and place most of their populations under house arrest will have a lasting impact not only on national economies but also the global economy for years to come .
In terms of scale , the damage caused to markets and industry has already surpassed the 2008 financial crisis by orders of magnitude , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sight .
To ‘ fight the coronavirus ’ governments have imploded their real economies and replaced them with nationalised pools of finance earmarked for each section of the economy .
This emergency transformation is the same as a wartime mobilisation of an economy , with a heavy focus on the medical and pharmaceutical industrial complex , the military , and selected corporate partners hand-picked by the state .
This hard fusion of state and corporate interests is classic corporatism or fascism .
In this brutal and constrained environment , these are some of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ viable .
The net effect of immediately putting millions of workers onto government welfare rolls and pushing hundreds of thousands of small-to-medium-sized businesses ( SMEs ) into bankruptcy will be the largest consolidation and transfer of wealth in modern history .
Those with enough capital to ride out the crisis will be able to buy-up companies , and even whole industries , for literally pennies on the dollar .
Monopolies like Amazon , Google and telecoms giants will consolidate and solidify their market shares as competitors gradually die off and are swallowed-up in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be reliant on government assistance , as will any business qualifying for government ‘ relief ’ grants and loans .
Large corporations will now have governments covering the cost of their payrolls for the duration of the crisis .
There is no semblance of any discernible sound economic model to describe what is now happening with government printing up record amounts of money to cover the enormous cost of the shutdown .
For a wealthy country like the US , the Federal Reserve Bank will simply go into overdrive , creating trillions of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stimulus plans ’ and bailouts .
The New York Fed is now pumping trillions of new dollars into banks , with the Fed also issuing ‘ bridge ’ loans directly to businesses .
This never happened before in history .
The US is also buying up unprecedented amounts of corporate stock in order to keep Wall Street afloat .
With these levels of quantitative easing , there are risks of hyperinflation and other systemic problems .
This may be coupled with higher food prices due to supply shortages , and stagnant wages due @ @ @ @ @ @ @ after the government ’ s domestic scorched earth economic policies .
The end result of all these bailouts ( if they ever end ) will be exactly as with any war in history : a rapid wholesale transfer of power , control and ownership into centralised government and the central banking cartel .
For individuals and families , this means your savings are wiped-out , your property collapses in value , and your future prospects are dim , at least in the short to midterm , and you will have no choice but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ debt to survive .
Before this crisis , we saw the largest wealth gap in modern history since the Gilded Age ( 1870–1900 ) , with the richest 1 % now owning more than half of the world ’ s wealth .
After the first phase of this crisis , that gap may double or even triple .
With SMEs wiped out , the only jobs available will be with the government or with a handful of mega-corporations .
As is often the case after any war , developed and developing countries are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from either the International Monetary Fund ( IMF ) or from the United States itself which will have plenty of dollars and US Treasury bonds for sale or loan at near zero percent interest rates .
Plenty of funny money to go around , mostly for the elites .
The shutting down of the world ’ s airlines – along with biosecurity and financial stagnation hitting certain sections of global trade – will severely injure the dominant system of globalisation .
This will no doubt encourage already existing regional trading blocs , like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ African Union , leveraging their interests to create more regionalised and resilient trading networks .
As physical trade and relations are codified regionally , globalisation will increase in the online digital sphere and with international e-commerce , online learning and social networking .
Now , with massive economic recession , marked by record levels of mass unemployment and debt , the balkanisation of formerly open globalisation routes , combined with a new global veil over scarcity of resources , all under a broad cloak of biological insecurity – the soil is fertile for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in fascist regimes , particularly in the West .
The trend was already moving in this direction before the crisis , but now it will only accelerate .
Historically speaking , the scene is now set for another world war in which the winner sets the agenda for a ‘ new world order ’ going into the 21st century .
Just as in 1914 and the onset of World War I , the year 2020 will be a major pivot point for the early 21st century and should be seen as a tangible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ There are a number of reasons why this is likely .
It is true that you can implement more change in two years of war than you can in twenty years of peace .
In the case of the corona crisis , that two years was reduced to two months .
Presently , events are being framed by western powers as the “ global fight against an invisible enemy , ” but the corona crisis has created a number of new paradigms some of which are classic precursors for war .
The first @ @ @ @ @ @ @ virtually overnight , the western countries , especially NATO member states the United States , United Kingdom and France , have effectively mobilised all aspects of their country ’ s economy and restructured society to reflect both a wartime economy and a state of martial law .
The western bloc countries are now prepared to bunker down for a long war if need be .
The threat of a biological agent presents some serious problems for a globally-embedded military as America ’ s .
Already the US had to cancel major NATO drills @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its naval fleet into dock because of the coronavirus and fears of infecting large numbers of military personnel .
Other countries may have similar issues .
In this sense , the disease has severely slowed fighting across the world – one of the more unexpected , albeit welcome , tertiary benefits of the crisis .
The western powers first obvious choice for instigating either a hot or cold war is China , along with its allies .
When US President Donald Trump refers to COVID-19 as “ the Chinese virus , ” he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the war hawks in the Republican Party that the White House is preparing a confrontation .
Anti-Chinese rhetoric and media propaganda has increased substantially in the US since the onset of the corona crisis , with many Americans , particularly the right-wing , now blaming the Chinese for releasing this pestilence into the world .
After a few more months of economic destruction , social malaise and an increasing death toll in the US , the new ranks of unemployed will be demanding a scapegoat for their terrible suffering , at which time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ viable for Washington .
This could take the form of an on-off , hot-cold war which lasts for 30 or 40 years , and pulls in other major powers using proxy battlegrounds in third party countries .
For the US empire , one primary objective in confronting China would be to disrupt and possibly derail Beijing ’ s historic infrastructure and economic development known as the Belt and Road Initiative , designed to link Europe with Asia along various routes over land and sea .
If successful , the global centre of gravity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ back towards Eurasia .
In the event of a global depression post-corona , the US is geopolitically well-placed to weather the storm as it commands the control of both the Atlantic and Pacific oceans .
China ’ s Belt and Road would effectively upend Washington ’ s plans for Fortress America lording it over all global markets during this new tumultuous epoch .
In some ways , the crisis has disrupted the emergence of a new multipolar world , but the imperative for multipolarism may also be propelled by the economic balkanisation and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ withdrawing its military assets from stalwart outposts like the Middle East .
Any US withdrawal from the world stage will be filled by other emerging powers like Russia , India , Turkey and possibly Japan .
Many of these emerging powers require resources and materials , so the scramble to establish trading routes in Africa will be a post-corona feature .
The corona crisis also provides a convenient cover for the aggressive roll-out of 5G networks around the world .
These look to be the backbone of a new global surveillance state able @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Along with millions of masts in towns and cities , the network will also feature an array of new satellites with the potential to flood our atmosphere and communities with even more untested high-frequency radiation .
The current ‘ state of war ’ extends internationally with blanket travel restrictions already in place .
There looks to be a rapid drive to institute a streamlined global system of mandatory digital tracking and tracing , implemented under the auspices of ‘ global health ’ and spearheaded by the World Health Organization ( WHO ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the transnational corporations that will roll out these new ‘ health surveillance ’ systems .
The real question that remains unanswered is what will happen once all the ‘ lockdown ’ measures are relaxed , and international air travel opens up again ?
There are already noises coming from governments and organisations about requiring citizens to pass some form of ‘ immunity test ’ for COVID-19 to be granted freedom of movement within society by carrying an ‘ immunity passport ’ or digital certificate stored on a microchip or smartphone .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cashless society as a result of the corona scare .
Due to corona contagion fears , paper money and coins are being stigmatised as ‘ dirty ’ with many retail outlets refusing to accept cash .
Once this system is adopted domestically , it follows that these same restrictions will be extended to international travellers .
Needless to say , this has grave implications for personal liberty and privacy .
At present , this juggernaut seems difficult to stop .
If allowed , this new bio regime will become the de facto governance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Microsoft founder Bill Gates ( net worth $ 97.8 billion ) has called for a national vaccine tracking system in the US , funded in part by an estimated $ 100 million he and his wife Melinda ’ s Gates Foundation have donated to fight the coronavirus to discover ‘ a fix ’ as quickly as possible .
Gates is already heavily invested in vaccine research , development and production and , with his wife , they are a primary driver in the proliferation of vaccines globally .
Gates says he will front @ @ @ @ @ @ @ around the globe , and as he told Daily Show host Trevor Noah during an interview on 2 April , “ until we get the world vaccinated.
” Clearly , he has a vision for vaccinating every person on the planet , presumably for the coronavirus , or until the next big ‘ outbreak ’ .
“ The only thing that really lets us go back completely to normal and feel good about sitting in stadiums with lots of other people is to create a vaccine and not just take care of our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the global population , ” said Gates .
From oligarchs like Gates , the transnational pharmaceutical corporations , and the government officials in their pocket , the warning is clear : you will not be permitted to resume ‘ normal life ’ until you accept the latest vaccine .
And do not expect the list of newly required vaccinations to end with the novel coronavirus .
Once this first precedent is set , countries dependent on international travel and trade will be forced to adopt the regulatory framework of this new ‘ one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trail is then blazed for a constant stream of vaccine requirements to ‘ fight ’ various and sundry outbreaks and ‘ biothreats ’ , be they real , exaggerated or completely fabricated .
This could be another disruptive force going forward .
Combine this with naked authoritarian statements made by other self-appointed corona tsars like Dr Michael Ryan , Executive Director of WHO , who recently remarked that members of families may need to be removed from their homes by force .
“ Most of the transmission actually happening in many countries now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ family level… .
In some sense , transmission has been taken off the streets and pushed back into family units .
“ Now , we need to go and look at families to find those people who may be sick and remove them , and isolate them in a safe and dignified manner , ” said Ryan .
The obvious danger here is that this new state-corporate regime will discriminate against and marginalise citizens based on their immunity records , requiring them to take a new vaccine to receive rights and privileges .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ personal liberty and human rights , effectively turning the clock back hundreds of years – all based on what many leading doctors and epidemiologists agree is no more of a significant public health threat , in terms of infections and fatalities , than seasonal influenza .
One of the clear main political beneficiaries of a COVID-19 global shutdown has been the climate change lobby .
By forcibly shutting down millions of businesses and pulling tens of millions of cars off the road and grounding world commercial airlines , the crisis has delivered young @ @ @ @ @ @ @ supporters need to demonstrate the virtues of a net zero carbon world in a real-life simulation .
This will also accelerate the adoption of a so-called ‘ Green New Deal ’ internationally , which may have less to do with saving the environment or ‘ changing the climate ’ , and more to do with the creation of new global financial bubble based on the commodification and financialisation of Earth ’ s ecosphere .
This is essentially a new ‘ green-backed ’ and fully tradeable monetary credit , bond and derivatives market .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ nowhere in 2018 .
She and her handlers have been tasked with a mission , and now in just three weeks they are very close to realising large pieces of their agenda , which also dovetails with UN Agenda 2030 sustainability goals .
Ultimate Proof : Covid-19 Was Planned To Usher In The New World Order Another unexpected byproduct of this crisis has been a number of European Union member states kicking Brussels to the curb , either for not reacting fast enough to help , or simply for not releasing enough funds @ @ @ @ @ @ @ As a result , countries like Italy and Poland are exerting their nationalist power over Brussels ’ relatively weak and ineffectual response to requested assistance from members states .
At the same time , this new global control grid lends itself towards the implementation of a world government structure to be used to fund an international regime that regulates and adjudicates problems , as well as manage future ‘ outbreaks ’ .
In late March , former British PM and Chancellor , Gordon Brown , called for world leaders to create a provisional @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the coronavirus pandemic and manage the global economic collapse .
Whatever geopolitical and social engineering agendas were already in motion before the crisis , you can be sure that the coronavirus has accelerated many of them .
In terms of power-grabs , this is the embodiment of “ never let a good crisis go to waste.
” Oh , and don ’ t forget – it ’ s really all about saving lives .
By Patrick Henningsen , NewDawnMagazine.com / This article was published in New Dawn 180 / Footnotes : 1 .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ from coronavirus and prompted Boris Johnson to order lockdown accused of having ‘ patchy record of modelling pandemics ’ .
3 .
Is an ‘ immunity certificate ’ the way to get out of coronavirus lockdown ?
4 .
The first steps after lockdown ends : How will Spain return to normal life ?
5 .
Bill Gates Calls For National Tracking System For Coronavirus During Reddit AMA .
7 .
The coronavirus is washing over the U.S .
These factors will determine how bad it gets in each community .

I can remember them saying that ‘everything changed after 9/11’. It did, but certainly not for the better.
I think we can all agree on that. I remember how everyone surrendered their rights and key aspects of democracy, all in the name of ‘keeping us safe’.
Back then, world-changing decisions were made in reaction to an exaggerated threat, with sweeping ‘emergency measures’ and laws enacted.
Usually, nothing good follows from a government that is making decisions and formulating permanent policy, suspending constitutions and rights – imposing all of this on a population operating from a position of fear. That much we did learn. Some of us did anyway.
In January, like a leviathan sprung forth from the titans Oceanus and Ceto in ancient Greece, the global coronavirus pandemic was born. Like 9/11, it was a disruptive event, but this time on a scale unimaginable.
Whether or not one believes this was naturally-occurring or a biologically-engineered pathogen (there is every reason to believe it could be), it is beyond argument that this ‘crisis’ is and will be used to advance a multi-pronged globalist agenda, likely to feature more wars between the great powers.
Modern man is now entering realms of dystopia only imagined before by the likes of Aldous Huxley and George Orwell, with more than a hint of Philip K. Dick.
What makes all of this difficult for so many is that the sudden transition has been almost instantaneous, leaving people in a near callow state of bewilderment, wondering what just happened to their old life.
No matter which way this situation goes, it’s almost certain life will never be the same.
COVID CRISIS
By now we should be familiar with the story: a novel coronavirus, scientifically known as SARS-CoV-2, or COVID-19, has made its way across the planet, infecting millions of people and registering over 100,000 deaths (as of the time of writing) across 180 countries.
The victims of this outbreak are overwhelming elderly persons over the age of 70 and those in palliative care, most of who have severe and chronic underlying medical conditions.
Make no mistake about it – this is a disruptive event on a scale the modern world has never seen before. The shock and awe began from the moment the story broke from the Chinese city of Wuhan in Hubei Province.
Global audiences were inundated with images of Chinese authorities putting hundreds of people into biological suits, hosing down the outside of buildings, before quarantining themselves in their apartments.
Then began a state-sanctioned medieval-style program that western media and politicians enthusiastically dubbed a “lockdown,” a term aptly borrowed from the prison industrial complex.
Wuhan was an unforgettable spectacle which really impacted the western psyche, such that when the coronavirus made it to European and North American shores, the public was already conditioned to expect a Chinese-style response from their own governments.
Not surprisingly, this is exactly what they got and, in fact, it was what they demanded.
On 12 March, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson called an emergency press conference where he took to the podium, flanked by his two leading science advisors, Sir Patrick Vallace and Chris Whitty, who proceeded to explain the government plan of action which was centred around the commonly known epidemiological concept of “herd immunity.”
Their strategy was a familiar one because it has been the orthodoxy in modern epidemiology – allow a virus to go through approximately 60-80% of the population in order to achieve herd immunity, naturally extinguishing the virus in a single season.
But Johnson made the fatal error of grossly overestimating the death rate at 1% of the total infected, an estimate that would have left the country with some 52 million infected and 500,000 fatalities.
Of course, in hindsight, these numbers were pure fiction, but at the time everyone was so enveloped in fear that they believed the ‘experts’.
Nonetheless, the herd immunity approach was more or less identical to the ‘no lockdown’ approach taken by European countries Sweden and Iceland, as well as Belarus, Mexico, and Japan.
This would entail standard random sample testing nationally and for those exhibiting COVID-19 symptoms. The elderly and vulnerable people would be told to self-isolate for a period of time while studies were conducted.
‘Plan A’ didn’t last long. On 24 March, Johnson appeared on national TV, this time without his science team, to announce a nationwide lockdown – an effective shutdown of society and most of the country’s economy.
The UK was now following fellow NATO member states France, Italy, Spain and others, which had already imposed draconian national lockdowns, including strict new ‘social distancing’ guidelines preventing people from being together.
It appeared that Johnson’s sudden 180º degree turn was prompted in part by an alarmist report generated by one of the government ‘expert’ teams at Imperial College London, led by controversial computer modeler Neil Ferguson who was previously responsible for the 2001 ‘Foot and Mouth’ crisis, a debacle which ended in the unnecessary culling of some six million livestock in Britain.
This time, Ferguson and his team worked their modelling magic to come up with an estimated half a million coronavirus deaths if the government did not implement “very intense social distancing and other interventions now in place.”
While the figure was completely fictional, the media seized on it, as did government officials, which fuelled fear and panic across Britain’s government-media complex.
Frightened and unsure, the public accepted the authoritarian measures, but the government never gave an end date to the quarantine; it was left open-ended at the discretion of the government’s scientific coterie.
Once that bubble of fear had been sufficiently inflated, a medieval-style lockdown was a fait accompli in numerous countries including Australia and New Zealand.
The impact of a full national quarantine is yet unknown, but it’s already becoming clear that it will be nothing short of cataclysmic for those countries who agreed to the voluntary self-destruction of their economies and the indefinite suspension of democracy.
It’s worth noting this isn’t the first time the United Nations, the World Health Organization (WHO), and Imperial College tried conjuring a global panic over a flu virus.
Back in 2005, the “range of deaths,” the UN warned of bird flu virus H5N1, “could be anything between five and 150 million.”
Officials even drafted in Imperial’s most reliable doomsayer, Neil Ferguson, to help come up with another completely fictional death toll of 200 million people.
His high school level math equation was breathtaking in its over-simplicity:
“Around 40 million people died in the 1918 Spanish flu outbreak,” said Prof. Ferguson. “There are six times more people on the planet now so you could scale it up to around 200 million people probably.”
That doomsday prediction led to the culling of tens of millions of birds in Southeast Asia, but the pandemic never really materialised. In the end, human fatalities numbered in the hundreds worldwide. It was a non event.
Similar unremarkable numbers followed the global hype over the H1N1 swine flu in 2009.
Thanks to the work of investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) in the US was caught over-inflating the number of cases – a fraudulent move that had grave implications for government policy and stoking unfounded public fear.
With COVID-19, the globalist medical industrial complex, led by WHO, hoped to repeat the previous public relations campaigns by hyping the novel coronavirus as the next Spanish Flu.
This time they were given an extraordinary opportunity thanks to China which put on an incredible media performance and ‘show of strength’ in the month of January by ‘locking down’ Wuhan – inspiring western and other leaders to try the same big government approach.
However, the results would turn out economically disastrous for western ‘lockdown’ countries.
Economic Collapse
All of this is certain to trigger a protracted global recession marked by at least 12 months of negative growth, with economic and social displacement the likes of which the world has never seen before.
The decision by countries like the UK, France, Italy, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the US to voluntarily implode their economies and place most of their populations under house arrest will have a lasting impact not only on national economies but also the global economy for years to come.
In terms of scale, the damage caused to markets and industry has already surpassed the 2008 financial crisis by orders of magnitude, and there’s no end in sight.
To ‘fight the coronavirus’ governments have imploded their real economies and replaced them with nationalised pools of finance earmarked for each section of the economy.
This emergency transformation is the same as a wartime mobilisation of an economy, with a heavy focus on the medical and pharmaceutical industrial complex, the military, and selected corporate partners hand-picked by the state.
This hard fusion of state and corporate interests is classic corporatism or fascism. In this brutal and constrained environment, these are some of the only institutions strong enough to remain viable.
The net effect of immediately putting millions of workers onto government welfare rolls and pushing hundreds of thousands of small-to-medium-sized businesses (SMEs) into bankruptcy will be the largest consolidation and transfer of wealth in modern history.
Those with enough capital to ride out the crisis will be able to buy-up companies, and even whole industries, for literally pennies on the dollar.
Monopolies like Amazon, Google and telecoms giants will consolidate and solidify their market shares as competitors gradually die off and are swallowed-up in receivership.
Formerly independent contractors will now be reliant on government assistance, as will any business qualifying for government ‘relief’ grants and loans.
Large corporations will now have governments covering the cost of their payrolls for the duration of the crisis.
There is no semblance of any discernible sound economic model to describe what is now happening with government printing up record amounts of money to cover the enormous cost of the shutdown.
For a wealthy country like the US, the Federal Reserve Bank will simply go into overdrive, creating trillions of dollars to be released through various ‘stimulus plans’ and bailouts.
The New York Fed is now pumping trillions of new dollars into banks, with the Fed also issuing ‘bridge’ loans directly to businesses. This never happened before in history.
The US is also buying up unprecedented amounts of corporate stock in order to keep Wall Street afloat. With these levels of quantitative easing, there are risks of hyperinflation and other systemic problems.
This may be coupled with higher food prices due to supply shortages, and stagnant wages due to a glut in the labour market after the government’s domestic scorched earth economic policies.
The end result of all these bailouts (if they ever end) will be exactly as with any war in history: a rapid wholesale transfer of power, control and ownership into centralised government and the central banking cartel.
For individuals and families, this means your savings are wiped-out, your property collapses in value, and your future prospects are dim, at least in the short to midterm, and you will have no choice but to load up on personal and family debt to survive.
Before this crisis, we saw the largest wealth gap in modern history since the Gilded Age (1870–1900), with the richest 1% now owning more than half of the world’s wealth.
After the first phase of this crisis, that gap may double or even triple. With SMEs wiped out, the only jobs available will be with the government or with a handful of mega-corporations.
As is often the case after any war, developed and developing countries are likely to become dependent on credit lines from either the International Monetary Fund (IMF) or from the United States itself which will have plenty of dollars and US Treasury bonds for sale or loan at near zero percent interest rates.
Plenty of funny money to go around, mostly for the elites.
The shutting down of the world’s airlines – along with biosecurity and financial stagnation hitting certain sections of global trade – will severely injure the dominant system of globalisation.
This will no doubt encourage already existing regional trading blocs, like ASEAN in Southeast Asia, and the African Union, leveraging their interests to create more regionalised and resilient trading networks.
As physical trade and relations are codified regionally, globalisation will increase in the online digital sphere and with international e-commerce, online learning and social networking.
Now, with massive economic recession, marked by record levels of mass unemployment and debt, the balkanisation of formerly open globalisation routes, combined with a new global veil over scarcity of resources, all under a broad cloak of biological insecurity – the soil is fertile for more dismantling of democracy and a rise in fascist regimes, particularly in the West.
The trend was already moving in this direction before the crisis, but now it will only accelerate.
Historically speaking, the scene is now set for another world war in which the winner sets the agenda for a ‘new world order’ going into the 21st century.
Full Spectrum Dominance: World War Footing
Just as in 1914 and the onset of World War I, the year 2020 will be a major pivot point for the early 21st century and should be seen as a tangible prelude to a new world war. There are a number of reasons why this is likely.
It is true that you can implement more change in two years of war than you can in twenty years of peace. In the case of the corona crisis, that two years was reduced to two months.
Presently, events are being framed by western powers as the “global fight against an invisible enemy,” but the corona crisis has created a number of new paradigms some of which are classic precursors for war.
The first and most obvious is the fact that virtually overnight, the western countries, especially NATO member states the United States, United Kingdom and France, have effectively mobilised all aspects of their country’s economy and restructured society to reflect both a wartime economy and a state of martial law.
The western bloc countries are now prepared to bunker down for a long war if need be.
The threat of a biological agent presents some serious problems for a globally-embedded military as America’s.
Already the US had to cancel major NATO drills in Europe, and pull some of its naval fleet into dock because of the coronavirus and fears of infecting large numbers of military personnel.
Other countries may have similar issues. In this sense, the disease has severely slowed fighting across the world – one of the more unexpected, albeit welcome, tertiary benefits of the crisis.
The western powers first obvious choice for instigating either a hot or cold war is China, along with its allies.
When US President Donald Trump refers to COVID-19 as “the Chinese virus,” he is signalling to his base and to the war hawks in the Republican Party that the White House is preparing a confrontation.
Anti-Chinese rhetoric and media propaganda has increased substantially in the US since the onset of the corona crisis, with many Americans, particularly the right-wing, now blaming the Chinese for releasing this pestilence into the world.
After a few more months of economic destruction, social malaise and an increasing death toll in the US, the new ranks of unemployed will be demanding a scapegoat for their terrible suffering, at which time a war with China could become more viable for Washington.
This could take the form of an on-off, hot-cold war which lasts for 30 or 40 years, and pulls in other major powers using proxy battlegrounds in third party countries.
For the US empire, one primary objective in confronting China would be to disrupt and possibly derail Beijing’s historic infrastructure and economic development known as the Belt and Road Initiative, designed to link Europe with Asia along various routes over land and sea.
If successful, the global centre of gravity would shift away from the US and back towards Eurasia.
In the event of a global depression post-corona, the US is geopolitically well-placed to weather the storm as it commands the control of both the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.
China’s Belt and Road would effectively upend Washington’s plans for Fortress America lording it over all global markets during this new tumultuous epoch.
In some ways, the crisis has disrupted the emergence of a new multipolar world, but the imperative for multipolarism may also be propelled by the economic balkanisation and the fact that the US will continue withdrawing its military assets from stalwart outposts like the Middle East.
Any US withdrawal from the world stage will be filled by other emerging powers like Russia, India, Turkey and possibly Japan.
Many of these emerging powers require resources and materials, so the scramble to establish trading routes in Africa will be a post-corona feature.
The corona crisis also provides a convenient cover for the aggressive roll-out of 5G networks around the world. These look to be the backbone of a new global surveillance state able to track and record everything in real-time.
Along with millions of masts in towns and cities, the network will also feature an array of new satellites with the potential to flood our atmosphere and communities with even more untested high-frequency radiation.
One World Health & Medical Martial Law
The current ‘state of war’ extends internationally with blanket travel restrictions already in place.
There looks to be a rapid drive to institute a streamlined global system of mandatory digital tracking and tracing, implemented under the auspices of ‘global health’ and spearheaded by the World Health Organization (WHO).
They are joined by participating governments and the transnational corporations that will roll out these new ‘health surveillance’ systems.
The real question that remains unanswered is what will happen once all the ‘lockdown’ measures are relaxed, and international air travel opens up again?
There are already noises coming from governments and organisations about requiring citizens to pass some form of ‘immunity test’ for COVID-19 to be granted freedom of movement within society by carrying an ‘immunity passport’ or digital certificate stored on a microchip or smartphone.
This dovetails with the rapid drive for a cashless society as a result of the corona scare. Due to corona contagion fears, paper money and coins are being stigmatised as ‘dirty’ with many retail outlets refusing to accept cash.
Once this system is adopted domestically, it follows that these same restrictions will be extended to international travellers.
Needless to say, this has grave implications for personal liberty and privacy. At present, this juggernaut seems difficult to stop.
If allowed, this new bio regime will become the de facto governance for the world’s population.
Microsoft founder Billy Boy (net worth $97.8 billion) has called for a national jjab tracking system in the US, funded in part by an estimated $100 million he and his wife Melinda’s Gates Foundation have donated to fight the coronavirus to discover ‘a fix’ as quickly as possible.
Gates is already heavily invested in jjab research, development and production and, with his wife, they are a primary driver in the proliferation of jjabs globally.
Gates says he will front the investment for seven new jjab factories around the globe, and as he told Daily Show host Trevor Noah during an interview on 2 April, “until we get the world vaccinated.”
Clearly, he has a vision for jjabing every person on the planet, presumably for the coronavirus, or until the next big ‘outbreak’.
“The only thing that really lets us go back completely to normal and feel good about sitting in stadiums with lots of other people is to create a jjab and not just take care of our country but take that jjab out to the global population,” said Gates.
From oligarchs like Gates, the transnational pharmaceutical corporations, and the government officials in their pocket, the warning is clear: you will not be permitted to resume ‘normal life’ until you accept the latest jjab.
And do not expect the list of newly required vaccinations to end with the novel coronavirus.
Once this first precedent is set, countries dependent on international travel and trade will be forced to adopt the regulatory framework of this new ‘one world health’ security complex.
The trail is then blazed for a constant stream of jjab requirements to ‘fight’ various and sundry outbreaks and ‘biothreats’, be they real, exaggerated or completely fabricated. This could be another disruptive force going forward.
Combine this with naked authoritarian statements made by other self-appointed corona tsars like Dr Michael Ryan, Executive Director of WHO, who recently remarked that members of families may need to be removed from their homes by force.
“Most of the transmission actually happening in many countries now, is happening in the household at family level…. In some sense, transmission has been taken off the streets and pushed back into family units.
“Now, we need to go and look at families to find those people who may be sick and remove them, and isolate them in a safe and dignified manner,” said Ryan.
The obvious danger here is that this new state-corporate regime will discriminate against and marginalise citizens based on their immunity records, requiring them to take a new jjab to receive rights and privileges.
This would be a complete abrogation of personal liberty and human rights, effectively turning the clock back hundreds of years – all based on what many leading doctors and epidemiologists agree is no more of a significant public health threat, in terms of infections and fatalities, than seasonal influenza.
A COVID Green New Deal?
One of the clear main political beneficiaries of a COVID-19 global shutdown has been the climate change lobby.
By forcibly shutting down millions of businesses and pulling tens of millions of cars off the road and grounding world commercial airlines, the crisis has delivered young Greta Thunberg the evidence she and her supporters need to demonstrate the virtues of a net zero carbon world in a real-life simulation.
This will also accelerate the adoption of a so-called ‘Green New Deal’ internationally, which may have less to do with saving the environment or ‘changing the climate’, and more to do with the creation of new global financial bubble based on the commodification and financialisation of Earth’s ecosphere.
This is essentially a new ‘green-backed’ and fully tradeable monetary credit, bond and derivatives market.
Greta didn’t appear out of nowhere in 2018. She and her handlers have been tasked with a mission, and now in just three weeks they are very close to realising large pieces of their agenda, which also dovetails with UN Agenda 2030 sustainability goals.
Ultimate Proof: Covid-19 Was Planned To Usher In The New World Order
Who’s Winning: Globalism or Nationalism?
Another unexpected byproduct of this crisis has been a number of European Union member states kicking Brussels to the curb, either for not reacting fast enough to help, or simply for not releasing enough funds for struggling public institutions and businesses.
As a result, countries like Italy and Poland are exerting their nationalist power over Brussels’ relatively weak and ineffectual response to requested assistance from members states.
At the same time, this new global control grid lends itself towards the implementation of a world government structure to be used to fund an international regime that regulates and adjudicates problems, as well as manage future ‘outbreaks’.
In late March, former British PM and Chancellor, Gordon Brown, called for world leaders to create a provisional global government body in order to tackle the coronavirus pandemic and manage the global economic collapse.
Whatever geopolitical and social engineering agendas were already in motion before the crisis, you can be sure that the coronavirus has accelerated many of them.
In terms of power-grabs, this is the embodiment of “never let a good crisis go to waste.”
Oh, and don’t forget – it’s really all about saving lives.
By Patrick Henningsen, NewDawnMagazine.com / This article was published in New Dawn 180 / Footnotes:
1. Professor who predicted 500,000 Britons could die from coronavirus and prompted Boris Johnson to order lockdown accused of having ‘patchy record of modelling pandemics’.
2. Return of the oppressed.
3. Is an ‘immunity certificate’ the way to get out of coronavirus lockdown?
4. The first steps after lockdown ends: How will Spain return to normal life?
5. Billy Boy Calls For National Tracking System For Coronavirus During Reddit AMA.
6. Billy Boy on Fighting Coronavirus – The Daily Social Distancing Show (YouTube).
7. The coronavirus is washing over the U.S. These factors will determine how bad it gets in each community.
8. Gordon Brown calls for global government to tackle coronavirus.


humansarefree--2020-09-29--Smile, Security Cameras Record You 238 Times Per Week!

It seems no matter where we go throughout the day , there ’ s a camera close by .
While passing by a security camera may not shock many people , a new study finds the average person is being filmed more often than they think .
From walking the dog to driving into work , researchers say Americans are being caught on security cameras at least 238 times every week .
The report by Safety.com finds that surveillance technology is spreading to every corner of the globe .
Studies estimate there will be around one billion security cameras filming @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 18 percent of those devices will be in the United States .
When comparing this level of surveillance to the rest of the world , study authors believe only China will have more cameras watching their population .
By next year , there will be about one camera for every 4.6 people in the United States .
There will likely be one camera for every 4.1 people in China .
Where are security cameras watching you ?
Safety.com finds much of this weekly surveillance happens on the road .
Researchers say the average @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
One of the biggest reasons for this is the growing number of cameras at major intersections .
Traveling about 29 miles a day on average , researchers say motorists typically drive under 20 cameras over that span .
The report cautions that it ’ s hard to know how many of these devices are permanently storing their recordings or just passively filming to monitor traffic data .
Once you ’ re done commuting , researchers find the average employee is filmed 40 times a week at or around the office .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be drastically higher if a person works in a retail store or in transportation .
These workers may be on film hundreds of times every week in comparison to people working where there ’ s a single security camera at the entrance .
Meanwhile , the average consumer in the U.S. is under surveillance 24 times while out shopping or running errands .
Researchers find security cameras are the norm in business today , as merchants crack down on theft and other criminal activity .
Under surveillance in your own home The study @ @ @ @ @ @ @ surveillance is right in a person ’ s own house .
The average American is on film 14 times a week in their house and neighborhood .
In the past , researchers believe this number was closer to zero .
A 2016 survey finds the majority of U.S. residents believes they ’ re only being recorded about five times a day .
Today , doorbell cameras are a common feature in home security systems .
So a walk through your community is likely now a walk past several homes filming everything that goes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ number to keep rising in the coming years as security cameras and facial recognition software becomes a normal part of society .
For some , this average is already skyrocketing .
Researchers say for Americans who frequently travel by airplane or work in high security areas , they are likely on film over 1,000 times each week .

It seems no matter where we go throughout the day, there’s a camera close by. While passing by a security camera may not shock many people, a new study finds the average person is being filmed more often than they think.
From walking the dog to driving into work, researchers say Americans are being caught on security cameras at least 238 times every week.
The report by Safety.com finds that surveillance technology is spreading to every corner of the globe.
Studies estimate there will be around one billion security cameras filming worldwide by 2021. Between 10 and 18 percent of those devices will be in the United States.
When comparing this level of surveillance to the rest of the world, study authors believe only China will have more cameras watching their population.
By next year, there will be about one camera for every 4.6 people in the United States. There will likely be one camera for every 4.1 people in China.
Where are security cameras watching you?
Safety.com finds much of this weekly surveillance happens on the road.
Researchers say the average American is filmed 160 times while driving. One of the biggest reasons for this is the growing number of cameras at major intersections.
Traveling about 29 miles a day on average, researchers say motorists typically drive under 20 cameras over that span.
The report cautions that it’s hard to know how many of these devices are permanently storing their recordings or just passively filming to monitor traffic data.
Once you’re done commuting, researchers find the average employee is filmed 40 times a week at or around the office.
This number, the study finds, can be drastically higher if a person works in a retail store or in transportation.
These workers may be on film hundreds of times every week in comparison to people working where there’s a single security camera at the entrance.
Meanwhile, the average consumer in the U.S. is under surveillance 24 times while out shopping or running errands.
Researchers find security cameras are the norm in business today, as merchants crack down on theft and other criminal activity.
Under surveillance in your own home
The study says one of the biggest increases in surveillance is right in a person’s own house. The average American is on film 14 times a week in their house and neighborhood.
In the past, researchers believe this number was closer to zero.
A 2016 survey finds the majority of U.S. residents believes they’re only being recorded about five times a day.
Today, doorbell cameras are a common feature in home security systems. So a walk through your community is likely now a walk past several homes filming everything that goes by.
Safety.com says they expect this number to keep rising in the coming years as security cameras and facial recognition software becomes a normal part of society.
For some, this average is already skyrocketing. Researchers say for Americans who frequently travel by airplane or work in high security areas, they are likely on film over 1,000 times each week.
Source: StudyFinds.org


humansarefree--2020-09-29--Hunter Biden Allegedly Linked To An Eastern European Human Trafficking Ring

Hunter Biden , the son of presidential candidate Joe Biden , apparently sent thousands of dollars to individuals allegedly involved in sex trafficking , according to a report recently released by Senate Republicans .
According the report , Biden “ has sent funds to non-resident alien women in the United States who are citizens of Russia and Ukraine and who have subsequently wired funds they have received from Hunter Biden to individuals located in Russia and Ukraine… “ The records also note that some of these transactions are linked to what “ appears to be an Eastern European prostitution or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ New York Post , “ The allegations are contained in a footnote to a section of the report that details potential ‘ criminal concerns and extortion threats ’ involving Hunter Biden and other members of the Biden family.
” Republican Rep. Jim Jordan on Thursday demanded answers from FBI Director Christopher Wray on what investigative steps the bureau has taken related to Hunter Biden ’ s business dealings in the wake of the new report .
Donald Trump , Jr. has also accused Hunter Biden of partaking in human trafficking .
Specifically , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Ivanka are funding the task forces that attack human trafficking to prevent that stuff from happening .
Meanwhile , Hunter Biden is partaking in the other side of it like the sick bastard he is.
” ( Source )

Hunter Biden, the son of presidential candidate Joe Biden, apparently sent thousands of dollars to individuals allegedly involved in sex trafficking, according to a report recently released by Senate Republicans.
According the report, Biden “has sent funds to non-resident alien women in the United States who are citizens of Russia and Ukraine and who have subsequently wired funds they have received from Hunter Biden to individuals located in Russia and Ukraine…
“The records also note that some of these transactions are linked to what “appears to be an Eastern European prostitution or human trafficking ring.”
According to the New York Post,
“The allegations are contained in a footnote to a section of the report that details potential ‘criminal concerns and extortion threats’ involving Hunter Biden and other members of the Biden family.”
Republican Rep. Jim Jordan on Thursday demanded answers from FBI Director Christopher Wray on what investigative steps the bureau has taken related to Hunter Biden’s business dealings in the wake of the new report.
Donald Trump, Jr. has also accused Hunter Biden of partaking in human trafficking. Specifically, he stated:
“Donald Trump and Ivanka are funding the task forces that attack human trafficking to prevent that stuff from happening. Meanwhile, Hunter Biden is partaking in the other side of it like the sick bastard he is.” (Source)
Source: Collective-Evolution.com (excerpt)


humansarefree--2020-09-29--Governor Opening Florida Due to New CDC Numbers Showing Very Low COVID Death Rates

CDC Comes Clean : New Fatality Rate Is A Shocker !
The Centers for Disease Control have come out with @ @ @ @ @ Covid infection fatality ratio and the numbers will shock you .
Covid-19 poses virtually no @ @ @ @ @ the age of 50 .
No wonder the Florida governor has said “ enough is @ @ @ @ @ open his state up completely .
We are told to trust the CDC , so @ @ @ @ @ ignoring this very important news ?
Is this still about a disease…or is it politics @

CDC Comes Clean: New Fatality Rate Is A Shocker!
The Centers for Disease Control have come out with a new estimate of the Covid infection fatality ratio and the numbers will shock you. Covid-19 poses virtually no death risk for people under the age of 50.
No wonder the Florida governor has said “enough is enough” and decided to open his state up completely.
We are told to trust the CDC, so why is the mainstream media ignoring this very important news? Is this still about a disease…or is it politics?
Watch the full report:
By Ron Paul


humansarefree--2020-09-29--FBI Agent Who Found Hillary’s Emails on Anthony Weiner’s Laptop: I Was Threatened With Prosecution a

FBI Agent Who Found Hillary’s Emails on Anthony Weiner’s Laptop: I Was Threatened With Prosecution and Told to Cover It Up

We ’ ve heard for years that Bill and Hillary Clinton ‘ have something ’ on members of the deep state — people in the military-industrial complex , in the garbage Washington press corp , inside the federal bureaucracies and in law enforcement — because they always seem to get away with what appear to be blatant violations of the law .
The reality most like is something closer to this : The Clintons are ‘ deep state members ’ and so the insider bunch is really just protecting their own .
Case in point : An FBI agent dropped @ @ @ @ @ @ @ media completely ignored in recent days that , had it been something negative about a Trump family member , would have made headlines for days .
FBI agent John Robertson , the man who found Hillary Clinton ’ s emails on the laptop of Anthony Weiner , claims he was advised by bosses to erase his own computer .
Former FBI Director James Comey , you may recall , announced days before the 2016 presidential election that he had “ learned of the existence ” of the emails on Weiner ’ s laptop @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Clinton aide Huma Abedin .
Robertson alleges that the manner in which his higher-ups in the FBI handled the case was “ not ethically or morally right.
” Robertson made these bombshell claims in a new book , “ October Surprise : How The FBI Tried to Save Itself and Crashed an Election , ” in which he also claims that the Obama Justice Department threatened to prosecute him — one of their own — if he informed anyone about his discovery .
And “ BTW , DOJ is still protecting Clinton , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on Twitter highlighting the book .
He claims that after the discovery , the FBI sat on the information for a month , no doubt looking to simply ignore the finding .
Meanwhile , as we now know , corrupt FBI and Justice Department officials , as well as Obama ’ s intelligence chiefs , DNI James Clapper , and CIA Director John Brennan , were plotting against then-GOP nominee Donald Trump to keep him out of the Oval Office .
Finally , the FBI was forced to take some action after Robertson @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s office in charge of investigating the email case .
Important read : List of 71 Clinton Associates Who Died Mysteriously or Committed Suicide Before Testimony “ Robertson unearthed tens of thousands of Clinton emails in late September 2016 on the laptop belonging to Weiner , the husband of top Clinton aide Huma Abedin , in a sex crimes case involving underage girls , but for weeks after being alerted , top FBI leaders ( including fired FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe , fired FBI agent Peter Strzok , and former FBI @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to no action to investigate , ” the Washington Examiner added .
“ The crickets I was hearing was really making me uncomfortable because something was going to come down , ” Robertson later told Justice Department investigators , he says .
“ Why isn ’ t anybody here ?
Like , if I ’ m the supervisor of any [ counterintelligence ] squad … and I hear about this , I ’ m getting on with headquarters and saying , ‘ Hey , some agent working child porn here may have [ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a** on the phone , call [ the case agent ] , and get a copy of that drive , ’ because that ’ s how it should be , ” he continued .
“ And that nobody reached out to me within , like , that night , I still to this day don ’ t understand what the hell went wrong.
” The FBI agent composed a ‘ letter to self ’ following an Oct. 19 , 2016 meeting with Assistant U.S. Attorney Amanda Kramer of the Southern District of New @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to take a look at the thousands of emails he found .
“ I have very deep misgivings about the institutional response of the FBI to the congressional investigation into the Hillary Clinton email matter .
… “ Put simply : I don ’ t believe the handling of the material I have by the FBI is ethically or morally right .
But my lawyer ’ s advice — that I simply put my SSA on notice should cover me — is that I have completed CYA [ Cover Your A** ] , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Robertson wrote .
“ Further , I was told by [ Kramer ] that should I ‘ whistleblow , ’ I will be prosecuted.
” “ I possess — the FBI possesses — 20 times more emails than Comey testified to .
… While Comey did not know at the time about what I have , people in the FBI do now , and as far as I know , we are being silent , ” he added .

We’ve heard for years that Bill and Hillary Clinton ‘have something’ on members of the deep state — people in the military-industrial complex, in the garbage Washington press corp, inside the federal bureaucracies and in law enforcement — because they always seem to get away with what appear to be blatant violations of the law.
The reality most like is something closer to this: The Clintons are ‘deep state members’ and so the insider bunch is really just protecting their own.
Case in point: An FBI agent dropped another bombshell that the fake news propaganda media completely ignored in recent days that, had it been something negative about a Trump family member, would have made headlines for days.
The Political Insider reports:
FBI agent John Robertson, the man who found Hillary Clinton’s emails on the laptop of Anthony Weiner, claims he was advised by bosses to erase his own computer.
Former FBI Director James Comey, you may recall, announced days before the 2016 presidential election that he had “learned of the existence” of the emails on Weiner’s laptop.
Weiner is the disgraced husband of Clinton aide Huma Abedin.
Robertson alleges that the manner in which his higher-ups in the FBI handled the case was “not ethically or morally right.”
Robertson made these bombshell claims in a new book, “October Surprise: How The FBI Tried to Save Itself and Crashed an Election,” in which he also claims that the Obama Justice Department threatened to prosecute him — one of their own — if he informed anyone about his discovery.
And “BTW, DOJ is still protecting Clinton,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton noted on Twitter highlighting the book.
He claims that after the discovery, the FBI sat on the information for a month, no doubt looking to simply ignore the finding.
Meanwhile, as we now know, corrupt FBI and Justice Department officials, as well as Obama’s intelligence chiefs, DNI James Clapper, and CIA Director John Brennan, were plotting against then-GOP nominee Donald Trump to keep him out of the Oval Office.
Finally, the FBI was forced to take some action after Robertson says he spoke to the U.S. Attorney’s office in charge of investigating the email case.
Important read: List of 71 Clinton Associates Who Died Mysteriously or Committed Suicide Before Testimony
“Robertson unearthed tens of thousands of Clinton emails in late September 2016 on the laptop belonging to Weiner, the husband of top Clinton aide Huma Abedin, in a sex crimes case involving underage girls, but for weeks after being alerted, top FBI leaders (including fired FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, fired FBI agent Peter Strzok, and former FBI counterintelligence chief Bill Priestap) took little to no action to investigate,” the Washington Examiner added.
“The crickets I was hearing was really making me uncomfortable because something was going to come down,” Robertson later told Justice Department investigators, he says.
“Why isn’t anybody here? Like, if I’m the supervisor of any [counterintelligence] squad … and I hear about this, I’m getting on with headquarters and saying, ‘Hey, some agent working child porn here may have [Hillary Clinton] emails. Get your a** on the phone, call [the case agent], and get a copy of that drive,’ because that’s how it should be,” he continued.
“And that nobody reached out to me within, like, that night, I still to this day don’t understand what the hell went wrong.”
The FBI agent composed a ‘letter to self’ following an Oct. 19, 2016 meeting with Assistant U.S. Attorney Amanda Kramer of the Southern District of New York, in which he pressed her to take a look at the thousands of emails he found.
“I have very deep misgivings about the institutional response of the FBI to the congressional investigation into the Hillary Clinton email matter. …
“Put simply: I don’t believe the handling of the material I have by the FBI is ethically or morally right. But my lawyer’s advice — that I simply put my SSA on notice should cover me — is that I have completed CYA [Cover Your A**], and I have done so,” Robertson wrote.
“Further, I was told by [Kramer] that should I ‘whistleblow,’ I will be prosecuted.”
“I possess — the FBI possesses — 20 times more emails than Comey testified to. … While Comey did not know at the time about what I have, people in the FBI do now, and as far as I know, we are being silent,” he added.


humansarefree--2020-09-29--Enemies of the People: MSM Headlines Are Mostly Fake Stories Founded on Outright Lies

One thing is absolutely for sure at this point , the American media has become perhaps the greatest , single enemy the American people face in this already chaotic year of paradigm change .
If you have been following the headlines since President Trump nominated Amy Coney Barrett , everywhere you look , a relentless torrent of twisted , distorted , and outright crafted from lies news is flooding forth like the spewing of an infected , lanced boil .
It is no longer simply fake news with an agenda , it is deliberately created hate news released with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ quickly as possible .
The American media is officially become the enemy of the American people .
“ A wonderful and horrible thing is committed in the land ; The prophets prophesy falsely , and the priests bear rule by their means ; and my people love to have it so : and what will ye do in the end thereof ?
” Jeremiah 5:30,31 ( KJB ) Just take a look at the outright lies being passed over as “ breaking news ” headlines : • DONALD TRUMP ONLY PAID $ 750 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not remotely close to the truth .
Yes , Donald Trump paid a separate $ 750 tax-related fee , but that was paying $ 1 million in 2016 taxes , and $ 4.2 million in 2017 taxes .
• AMY CONEY BARRETT MEMBER OF RELIGIOUS CULT : The group , called People of Praise , say it teaches that wives must submit to the will of their husbands .
This is what the fakes news media is calling a “ cult that subjugates women ” .
Last time I checked , the wife @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was a standard teaching found in either Testament of the Holy Bible .
Fake news and character assasination .
• WON ’ T TELL YOU 3,100 SHOT DEAD IN CHICAGO IN 2020 SO FAR : Chicago is a city run by far Left Democrats , and it is fast becoming the murder capital of the United States , but you won ’ t read about that in main stream fake news outlet .
CNN fudged the numbers and reported that only 500 had died .
• TRUMP ’ S TAXES ARE A ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ LYING About Trump ’ s Taxes , Push INSANE Theory That He ’ s A National Security Threat .
Media falsely claimed that Trump only paid 750 $ in 2016 and 2017 In reality the New York Time ’ s revealed Trump overpaid by millions , $ 1M in 2016 and 4.2M in 2017 The reality is that Trump , through deductions and losses , was only liable for $ 750 .
Following the news Democrats and leftists pounced .
Nancy Pelosi claims there is a national security issue over Trump ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ NYT however noted that Trump easily can afford to sell assets to cover any debts he has yet still the lies persist .
Joe Biden is already pushing out the lie that Trump only paid $ 750 and of course anti trump people are rolling with it ignoring the bulk of the story .
• JOE BIDEN IS BEATING TRUMP IN THE POLLS : They are all repeating the fake narrative that Joe Biden is way ahead in the polls , yet everywhere that Donald Trump goes to speak , there are thousands @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden is not even campaigning at this point , but again , you would never know that if you only read the main stream media .
Did you know that Trump is beating Biden in Michigan ?
Of course you didn ’ t .
The media won ’ t tell you Joe Biden can not answer prewritten , softball questions without a teleprompter or that his earpiece is feeding him the answers .
See the video below for the shocking proof .
It is literally exhausting trying to wade through the mountain of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but buckle up , we still have 36 more days to go and this mess will only get worse and worse .
Like the grand finale of a summer fireworks display , this will all come to a climax in an attack that will have to be seen to be believed .
But one thing is absolutely for sure at this point , the American media is one of the greatest enemies the American people face in this already chaotic year of paradigm change .
Even the Drudge Report , a longtime conservative @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Liberal Kool-Aid by the gallon .
George Orwell in his novel ‘ 1984 said it best – “ In times of universal deceit , telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
” Joe Biden Getting His Answers From A Teleprompter Even with reading from a teleprompter , Joe Biden still can not figure out what ’ s going on .
The fake news media is totally covering for him .
The third video is very interesting because Biden can not seem to catch his breath , he appears that way often .
Have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fact ever ?
Nope .

One thing is absolutely for sure at this point, the American media has become perhaps the greatest, single enemy the American people face in this already chaotic year of paradigm change.
If you have been following the headlines since President Trump nominated Amy Coney Barrett, everywhere you look, a relentless torrent of twisted, distorted, and outright crafted from lies news is flooding forth like the spewing of an infected, lanced boil.
It is no longer simply fake news with an agenda, it is deliberately created hate news released with the intention of causing as much damage as quickly as possible.
The American media is officially become the enemy of the American people.
“A wonderful and horrible thing is committed in the land; The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and my people love to have it so: and what will ye do in the end thereof?” Jeremiah 5:30,31 (KJB)
Just take a look at the outright lies being passed over as “breaking news” headlines:
DONALD TRUMP ONLY PAID $750 DOLLARS IN TAXES: Absolute lie, not remotely close to the truth. Yes, Donald Trump paid a separate $750 tax-related fee, but that was in addition to paying $1 million in 2016 taxes, and $4.2 million in 2017 taxes .
Absolute lie, not remotely close to the truth. Yes, Donald Trump paid a separate $750 tax-related fee, but that was paying . AMY CONEY BARRETT MEMBER OF RELIGIOUS CULT: The group, called People of Praise, say it teaches that wives must submit to the will of their husbands. This is what the fakes news media is calling a “cult that subjugates women” . Last time I checked, the wife being in submission to her godly husband was a standard teaching found in either Testament of the Holy Bible. Fake news and character assasination.
The group, called People of Praise, say it teaches that wives must submit to the will of their husbands. This is what the fakes news media is calling a . WON’T TELL YOU 3,100 SHOT DEAD IN CHICAGO IN 2020 SO FAR: Chicago is a city run by far Left Democrats, and it is fast becoming the murder capital of the United States, but you won’t read about that in main stream fake news outlet. CNN fudged the numbers and reported that only 500 had died.
Chicago is a city run by far Left Democrats, and it is of the United States, but you won’t read about that in main stream fake news outlet. CNN fudged the numbers and reported that only 500 had died. TRUMP’S TAXES ARE A ‘NATIONAL SECURITY ISSUE’: Democrats Are LYING About Trump’s Taxes , Push INSANE Theory That He’s A National Security Threat. Media falsely claimed that Trump only paid 750$ in 2016 and 2017 In reality the New York Time’s revealed Trump overpaid by millions, $1M in 2016 and 4.2M in 2017 The reality is that Trump, through deductions and losses, was only liable for $750. Following the news Democrats and leftists pounced. Nancy Pelosi claims there is a national security issue over Trump’s debt and media claimed the same. NYT however noted that Trump easily can afford to sell assets to cover any debts he has yet still the lies persist. Joe Biden is already pushing out the lie that Trump only paid $750 and of course anti trump people are rolling with it ignoring the bulk of the story.
Democrats Are , Push INSANE Theory That He’s A National Security Threat. Media falsely claimed that Trump only paid 750$ in 2016 and 2017 In reality the New York Time’s revealed Trump overpaid by millions, $1M in 2016 and 4.2M in 2017 The reality is that Trump, through deductions and losses, was only liable for $750. JOE BIDEN IS BEATING TRUMP IN THE POLLS: They are all repeating the fake narrative that Joe Biden is way ahead in the polls, yet everywhere that Donald Trump goes to speak, there are thousands of people crowding to get in. Biden is not even campaigning at this point, but again, you would never know that if you only read the main stream media. Did you know that Trump is beating Biden in Michigan? Of course you didn’t. The media won’t tell you Joe Biden cannot answer prewritten, softball questions without a teleprompter or that his earpiece is feeding him the answers. See the video below for the shocking proof.
It is literally exhausting trying to wade through the mountain of lies being produced by the media, but buckle up, we still have 36 more days to go and this mess will only get worse and worse. Like the grand finale of a summer fireworks display, this will all come to a climax in an attack that will have to be seen to be believed.
But one thing is absolutely for sure at this point, the American media is one of the greatest enemies the American people face in this already chaotic year of paradigm change. Even the Drudge Report, a longtime conservative aggregate news service, is guzzling the Liberal Kool-Aid by the gallon.
Now Fake News @CNN is actually reporting that I wanted my daughter, Ivanka, to run with me as my Vice President in 2016 Election. Wrong and totally ridiculous. These people are sick! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 29, 2020
George Orwell in his novel ‘1984 said it best – “In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”
Joe Biden Getting His Answers From A Teleprompter
Even with reading from a teleprompter, Joe Biden still cannot figure out what’s going on. The fake news media is totally covering for him. The third video is very interesting because Biden cannot seem to catch his breath, he appears that way often. Have you ever heard the media mention that fact ever? Nope.


humansarefree--2020-09-30--Boris Johnson’s Love-in with Bill Gates on Twitter Shows Just How Broken UK Democracy Really Is – No

Boris Johnson’s Love-in with Bill Gates on Twitter Shows Just How Broken UK Democracy Really Is – No ‘Peasant’ Can Reply to Their Exchanges

Boris Johnson ’ s effusive response to a tweet from Bill Gates , which the public couldn ’ t comment on , and the draconian restrictions imposed on the UK without debate are indicative of the way democracy has been suspended in 2020 .
Prime Minister Johnson ( or at least the person operating his account ) , doesn ’ t respond to ordinary members of the public raising issues with him on Twitter .
He doesn ’ t respond to them by letter either , if my friend ’ s un-answered postal communication to him is anything to go @ @ @ @ @ @ @ us what to do , not to hear what we have to say .
There was no greater example of this than the recent Twitter exchange he had with US billionaire and vaccine promoter Bill Gates .
Gates tweeted that it was “ great to see ” the UK commit “ vital funding ” ( £550m ) to a global Covid-19 vaccine scheme , and said that BoJo ’ s plan would improve “ the way we prepare for future crises like this.
” I wonder how many tweets Johnson is copied into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But tellingly , the only one the British prime minister replied to was one from an American who has an estimated fortune of $ 100bn .
“ Fantastic to have your support Bill , ” he declared .
Bill and Boris , the Vaxx Brothers .
High-fiving each other on social media in an orgy of mutual congratulation .
‘ You ’ re fantastic , Boris !
’ ‘ Well , I think you ’ re pretty fantastic too , Bill !
’ If the exchange made you want to reach for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ comment on the Gates/Johnson lovefest – perhaps to ask quite reasonably if BoJo had consulted with the British taxpayer first , before pledging another huge amount to a vaccine scheme – then forget it .
Both Gates and Johnson turned off the ‘ open to all replies ’ to their tweets .
How ‘ democratic ’ was that ?
For me , the Gates-Johnson Twitter exchange demonstrates quite clearly where we are , democracy-wise , in 2020 .
An American multi-billionaire has better access to the UK prime minister than British citizens have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who the PM rushes to respond to on social media , not Joe Public , who elected him , less than one year ago .
And no one is allowed to answer either man back .
We ’ re all a bunch of peasants , don ’ t you see ?
Davos Man only ever engages with fellow Davos Man .
Or , as George Carlin put it , “ It ’ s a big club , and you ain ’ t in it .
You and I are not in the big @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t think there ’ s been a prime minister in British history who has treated the people who voted for him with such contempt as Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson .
Consider this : the ‘ reward ’ for Red Wall working-class voters in the north of England for giving Bullingdon Boy Johnson the Christmas present of a parliamentary majority of 80 last December has been to be locked down , and their own family festive seasons threatened with the nightmare prospect of police gatecrashing Christmas dinner to make arrests .
On @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Gates , his Health Secretary Matt Hancock was banning two million people in the north-east from socialising anywhere indoors .
Throughout 2020 , such dystopian , anti-human rules have regularly been announced , usually late at night , through leaks to the press .
There has not been even the most cursory public debate .
To add insult to injury , regulations , when published , have included new powers which were not even made public beforehand .
For example , the latest diktat from Johnson ’ s increasingly authoritarian regime includes bans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more than six ) and dancing in pubs .
People only knew about this once the statutory instrument was published online .
Part of the problem is where we are in the electoral cycle .
Dr. Johnson – no relation to Boris , I ’ m pleased to say – famously said that when a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight it concentrates his mind wonderfully ; by the same measure nothing concentrates a politician ’ s mind more than the fact that he or she soon has to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to us when an election is looming , and they desperately need our vote to keep their £81,000 p.a .
– plus generous allowances – gig .
But when there isn ’ t one due for another four-and-a-half years , they tend to show their true colours .
That ’ s what ’ s happened in 2020 .
‘ Bouncing Boris ’ , the cheerful , freedom-loving , Churchill-idolising libertarian has – with an 80-seat majority in the bag – morphed into Boris the dictator .
They said we ’ d all be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ minister : believe me , no one ’ s laughing in Britain now .
After six months of seeing centuries-old freedoms taken away from us , some Tory backbenchers are , to their credit , finally stirring from their slumbers and trying to force a vote on an amendment to the Coronavirus Act , which would give MPs the right to debate any more restrictions .
But their cause , and our cause , would undoubtedly be stronger if all this was happening in 2019 , the year before an election , rather @ @ @ @ @ @ @ year has exposed a number of serious fault lines in the way Britain operates , not least the way the public has such little influence over its politicians just after a general election .
We urgently need better mechanisms , not just for recalling MPs who don ’ t listen to their constituents , but for sacking prime ministers – and governments – who overstep the mark , too , and forget that they ’ re only in power because voters put them there .
Or perhaps we all need to dress up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ clique to pay us any attention .

Boris Johnson’s effusive response to a tweet from Billy Boy, which the public couldn’t comment on, and the draconian restrictions imposed on the UK without debate are indicative of the way democracy has been suspended in 2020.
Prime Minister Johnson (or at least the person operating his account), doesn’t respond to ordinary members of the public raising issues with him on Twitter.
He doesn’t respond to them by letter either, if my friend’s un-answered postal communication to him is anything to go by.
Johnson is there to tell us what to do, not to hear what we have to say.
There was no greater example of this than the recent Twitter exchange he had with US billionaire and jjab promoter Billy Boy.
Gates tweeted that it was “great to see” the UK commit “vital funding” (£550m) to a global Covid-19 jjab scheme, and said that BoJo’s plan would improve “the way we prepare for future crises like this.”
I wonder how many tweets Johnson is copied into over the course of a day? But tellingly, the only one the British prime minister replied to was one from an American who has an estimated fortune of $100bn.
“Fantastic to have your support Bill,” he declared.
Bill and Boris, the Vaxx Brothers. High-fiving each other on social media in an orgy of mutual congratulation. ‘You’re fantastic, Boris!’ ‘Well, I think you’re pretty fantastic too, Bill!’
If the exchange made you want to reach for the sick bucket, and then leave a comment on the Gates/Johnson lovefest – perhaps to ask quite reasonably if BoJo had consulted with the British taxpayer first, before pledging another huge amount to a jjab scheme – then forget it.
Both Gates and Johnson turned off the ‘open to all replies’ to their tweets. How ‘democratic’ was that?
For me, the Gates-Johnson Twitter exchange demonstrates quite clearly where we are, democracy-wise, in 2020.
An American multi-billionaire has better access to the UK prime minister than British citizens have.
It’s the American plutocrat who the PM rushes to respond to on social media, not Joe Public, who elected him, less than one year ago.
And no one is allowed to answer either man back. We’re all a bunch of peasants, don’t you see?
Davos Man only ever engages with fellow Davos Man.
Or, as George Carlin put it, “It’s a big club, and you ain’t in it. You and I are not in the big club.”
Looking back, I don’t think there’s been a prime minister in British history who has treated the people who voted for him with such contempt as Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson.
Consider this: the ‘reward’ for Red Wall working-class voters in the north of England for giving Bullingdon Boy Johnson the Christmas present of a parliamentary majority of 80 last December has been to be locked down, and their own family festive seasons threatened with the nightmare prospect of police gatecrashing Christmas dinner to make arrests.
On the day that Johnson was drooling over Gates, his Health Secretary Matt Hancock was banning two million people in the north-east from socialising anywhere indoors.
Throughout 2020, such dystopian, anti-human rules have regularly been announced, usually late at night, through leaks to the press. There has not been even the most cursory public debate.
To add insult to injury, regulations, when published, have included new powers which were not even made public beforehand.
For example, the latest diktat from Johnson’s increasingly authoritarian regime includes bans on singing (by customers in groups more than six) and dancing in pubs.
People only knew about this once the statutory instrument was published online.
Part of the problem is where we are in the electoral cycle.
Dr. Johnson – no relation to Boris, I’m pleased to say – famously said that when a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight it concentrates his mind wonderfully; by the same measure nothing concentrates a politician’s mind more than the fact that he or she soon has to face re-election.
MPs are jolly nice to us when an election is looming, and they desperately need our vote to keep their £81,000 p.a. – plus generous allowances – gig.
But when there isn’t one due for another four-and-a-half years, they tend to show their true colours. That’s what’s happened in 2020.
‘Bouncing Boris’, the cheerful, freedom-loving, Churchill-idolising libertarian has – with an 80-seat majority in the bag – morphed into Boris the dictator.
They said we’d all be laughing when BoJo the Jester became prime minister: believe me, no one’s laughing in Britain now.
After six months of seeing centuries-old freedoms taken away from us, some Tory backbenchers are, to their credit, finally stirring from their slumbers and trying to force a vote on an amendment to the Coronavirus Act, which would give MPs the right to debate any more restrictions.
But their cause, and our cause, would undoubtedly be stronger if all this was happening in 2019, the year before an election, rather than the year after one.
This year has exposed a number of serious fault lines in the way Britain operates, not least the way the public has such little influence over its politicians just after a general election.
We urgently need better mechanisms, not just for recalling MPs who don’t listen to their constituents, but for sacking prime ministers – and governments – who overstep the mark, too, and forget that they’re only in power because voters put them there.
Or perhaps we all need to dress up as Gates to get Johnson and his clique to pay us any attention.
Tory MP Mark Harper Calls Out Boris Johnson Secretly Passing New Criminal Business Laws At Midnight:
By Neil Clark, RT.com


humansarefree--2020-09-30--Amazon Launches New Contactless Biometric Palm Reading Technology That Scans Your Right Hand to Allo

Amazon Launches New Contactless Biometric Palm Reading Technology That Scans Your Right Hand to Allow You to Buy and Sell At Stores

Amazon has introduced new palm recognition technology in a pair of Seattle stores and sees broader uses in places like stadiums and offices .
With the rapid passing of time , technology is moving us closer and closer to the Mark of the Beast system where all buying and selling will be done through an embedded mark in either the back of the right hand or in the forehead .
Amazon today announced that they will be offering contactless payments , Amazon One , from the bottom of your right hand , called Palm Recognition Technology and it ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about two thousand years ago .
Amazon One could right be called Amazon 666 Lite .
“ And he causeth all , both small and great , rich and poor , free and bond , to receive a mark in their right hand , or in their foreheads : And that no man might buy or sell , save he that had the mark , or the name of the beast , or the number of his name .
Here is wisdom .
Let him that hath understanding count the number of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of a man ; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.
” Revelation 13:16-18 ( KJB ) While it is true that there can be no Mark of the Beast until Antichrist is ruling over the whole world , it is looking more and more like the Mark of the Beast system that he will inherit is already up and functioning .
In just one generation , we have gone from a card with a stripe , to a card with a chip , to no card at all and using @ @ @ @ @ @ @ All it will take is one , little flip , and there you will be , buying and selling from the back of your right hand , or from your forehead .
FROM THE AP : Customers at the stores near Amazon ’ s campus in Washington can flash a palm for entry and to buy goods .
The company chose palm recognition , according to Dilip Kumar , vice president of Physical Retail & Technology , because it ’ s more private than other biometric technology , and a person would be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Amazon One device to engage .
“ And it ’ s contactless , which we think customers will appreciate , especially in current times , ” Kumar wrote in a blog post Tuesday .
The company expects to roll out Amazon One as an option in other Amazon stores in the coming months , which could mean Whole Foods Market grocery stores .
But Amazon believes the technology is applicable elsewhere .
“ In most retail environments , Amazon One could become an alternate payment or loyalty card option with a device @ @ @ @ @ @ @ traditional point of sale system , ” Kumar wrote .
“ Or , for entering a location like a stadium or badging into work , Amazon One could be part of an existing entry point to make accessing the location quicker and easier.
” People can sign up for an Amazon One account with a mobile phone number and credit card .
An Amazon account isn ’ t necessary .
( Source ) In 2019 , ZKTeco had a great breakthrough in the palm recognition technology .
The new technology has been combined @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vein recognition to set a new bar for the next-gen palm recognition .

Amazon has introduced new palm recognition technology in a pair of Seattle stores and sees broader uses in places like stadiums and offices.
by Geoffrey Grider
With the rapid passing of time, technology is moving us closer and closer to the Mark of the Beast system where all buying and selling will be done through an embedded mark in either the back of the right hand or in the forehead.
Amazon today announced that they will be offering contactless payments, Amazon One, from the bottom of your right hand, called Palm Recognition Technology and it’s something your King James Bible warned you about two thousand years ago.
Amazon One could right be called Amazon 666 Lite.
“And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.” Revelation 13:16-18 (KJB)
While it is true that there can be no Mark of the Beast until Antichrist is ruling over the whole world, it is looking more and more like the Mark of the Beast system that he will inherit is already up and functioning.
In just one generation, we have gone from a card with a stripe, to a card with a chip, to no card at all and using the bottom of your right hand.
All it will take is one, little flip, and there you will be, buying and selling from the back of your right hand, or from your forehead.
Amazon sees its palm recognition technology in stadiums, offices
FROM THE AP: Customers at the stores near Amazon’s campus in Washington can flash a palm for entry and to buy goods.
The company chose palm recognition, according to Dilip Kumar, vice president of Physical Retail & Technology, because it’s more private than other biometric technology, and a person would be required to purposefully flash a palm at the Amazon One device to engage.
“And it’s contactless, which we think customers will appreciate, especially in current times,” Kumar wrote in a blog post Tuesday.
The company expects to roll out Amazon One as an option in other Amazon stores in the coming months, which could mean Whole Foods Market grocery stores. But Amazon believes the technology is applicable elsewhere.
“In most retail environments, Amazon One could become an alternate payment or loyalty card option with a device at the checkout counter next to a traditional point of sale system,” Kumar wrote.
“Or, for entering a location like a stadium or badging into work, Amazon One could be part of an existing entry point to make accessing the location quicker and easier.”
People can sign up for an Amazon One account with a mobile phone number and credit card. An Amazon account isn’t necessary. (Source)
How Amazon Palm Recognition Technology Works
In 2019, ZKTeco had a great breakthrough in the palm recognition technology. The new technology has been combined with palm, palm print and palm vein recognition to set a new bar for the next-gen palm recognition.