humansarefree--2020-06-11--US Surveillance Bill 6666: The Devil in the Details (A ‘Monstrously Unconstitutional’ Bill)

As if vaccine passports , COVID-19 contact tracing apps and the Rockefeller Foundation ’ s plan to reopen America don ’ t already pose enough of a threat to civil liberties and democratic society , here comes a new bill , H.R .
6666 , the COVID-19 Testing , Reaching And Contacting Everyone ( TRACE ) Act.1 The bill was introduced and referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce by Rep. Bobby Rush , D-Ill. , May 1 , 2020 .
As of May 25 , 2020 , the bill has 64 cosponsors — all Democrats .
Originally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but he withdrew his sponsorship May 15 .
According to the summary of the bill:2 “ This bill authorizes the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC ) to award grants for testing , contact tracing , monitoring , and other activities to address COVID-19 ( i.e.
, coronavirus disease 2019 ) .
Entities such as federally qualified health centers , nonprofit organizations , and certain hospitals and schools are eligible to receive such grants .
In awarding the grants , the CDC shall prioritize applicants that ( 1 ) operate in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and ( 2 ) agree to hire individuals from the communities where grant activities occur.
” Needless to say , many an eyebrow are being raised over the “ 6666 ” in the resolution .
It seems both unfortunate and ironically apt .
As noted by Cheryl Chumley in a May 12 , 2020 , Washington Times article:3 “ Mark of the beast .
Mark of the beast for a beastly , monstrously unconstitutional bill .
After all , what ’ s more devilishly un-American than launching one of the most massive government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ history , all under the guise of protecting people from the coronavirus ?
” The government grants — a whopping $ 100 billion of taxpayer money for 2020 alone — would be used by “ eligible entities ” to hire employees and buy the supplies needed to conduct testing and contact tracing .
This includes sending employees to the residences of citizens to conduct COVID-19 testing .
Entities eligible for grant money include federally qualified health centers , school-based clinics , disproportionate share hospitals , academic medical centers , nonprofit organizations , institutions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any other entities determined to be eligible by the Health and Human Services Secretary .
If you test positive , you would then be quarantined either at a mobile health unit or in your own home .
Contact tracers would also collect information about anyone you may have come into contact with so that they can be tested and , if needed , quarantined .
As noted by Chumley , just how the government intends to ensure compliance with quarantine remains an unanswered question .
We now know that up to 80 % @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and for people who feel fine , being locked up , whether at home or in a mobile unit , for two weeks or more may not be a welcome proposition at this point .
In a nutshell , H.R .
6666 calls for taking $ 100 billion of our taxpayer money to fund our own persecution .
I say “ persecution , ” considering this virus isn ’ t particularly lethal for people under the age of 80 , and has an overall survival rate of about 99 % and therefore doesn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the vast majority of the population .
At present , most data are still unreliable , seeing how “ suspected ” cases are lumped into mortality statistics .
But two situations for which we have more complete data suggest the risk from SARS-CoV-2 is minimal .
For example , of the roughly 4,800 crew on the U.S. aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt , 840 tested positive,5 but 60 % were asymptomatic,6 meaning they had no symptoms .
Only one crewmember died.7 Similarly , among the 3,711 passengers and crew onboard the Diamond Princess @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 , and of these 46.5 % were asymptomatic at the time of testing .
Of those showing symptoms , only 9.7 % required intensive care and 1.3 % ( nine ) died.8 Military personnel , as you would expect , tend to be healthier than the general population .
Still , the data from these two incidents reveal several important points to consider .
First of all , it suggests that even when living in close , crowded quarters , the infection rate is low .
Only 17.5 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ got infected — slightly lower than the 19.2 % of those onboard the Diamond Princess , which had a greater ratio of older people .
Second , fit and healthy individuals are more likely to be asymptomatic than not — 60 % of naval personnel compared to 46.5 % of civilians onboard the Diamond Princess had no symptoms despite testing positive .
While H.R .
6666 may not be satanic , it ’ s certainly “ devilish , ” Bob Barr writes in a May 20 , 2020 , Marietta Daily Journal op-ed.9 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Law Enforcement Education Foundation , is a former U.S .
Congressman for Georgia ’ s Seventh District .
“ Make no mistake … the bill is a dangerous piece of legislation , not because of its number , but because of its substance , ” Barr writes .
“ It is the latest in a long line of legislative vehicles … to increase the federal government ’ s power to gather and database private information on citizens … “ In this latest effort , House Democrats have employed the tradecraft for which the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the true purpose of legislation behind a façade of protecting people from a known or perceived danger … “ The specific provisions within H.R .
6666 pose a very real danger ; not only as a stand-alone bill … but as a possible amendment that could be slipped into the most recent , massive COVID-19 ‘ stimulus ’ bill that passed the House last week .
“ The administration already has signaled support for some version of a Phase IV relief package , and whatever that final document looks like , it is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ making it a perfect vehicle in which to hide a provision for ‘ contact tracing ’ similar perhaps to what Rush ’ s TRACE Act would do … “ Those of us who are concerned about the growth of government surveillance and data-basing of personal information must be vigilant against measures like the TRACE Act , regardless of their surface appeal .
We must demand the Congress and the Administration aggressively oppose any such measures.
” Considering the latest iPhone and Android updates make the phones contact-tracing ready , the bill has , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pass .
As reported by Global World Trends,10 Apple ’ s iOS 13.5 update contains a built-in Exposure Notifications API , which will “ allow governments and public health agencies to develop apps that alert you if you ’ ve come into contact with someone who later tests positive for Covid-19 and that person anonymously logs their positive result into a database.
” API stands for “ application programming interface.
” 11 It ’ s essentially a set of functions that allow apps to access certain data or features of the operating system @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have to download a contact tracing app in order to participate in a contact tracing program , according to an Apple representative.12 As detailed by the National Vaccine Information Center ( NVIC ) in a recent “ Action Alert ” emailed to users of NVIC ’ s Advocacy Portal:13 “ H.R .
6666 is a federal funding bill .
It proposes to create a surveillance infrastructure that can be used by the federal government , as well as local and state governments and private businesses , to require medical testing and tracking of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ violation of fundamental civil liberties as set forth in the Bill of Rights , which include the first 10 amendments to the U.S. Constitution designed to protect individual rights and limit the power of the government .
“ H.R .
6666 lacks safeguards and conditions related to funding of the proposed surveillance operation to prevent it from being applied to intrusive programs mandating testing and surveillance without an individual ’ s voluntary consent .
“ If this legislation is passed by Congress and enacted into law , it could lead to denial of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in public spaces and travel ; the right to employment and education or participation in government-funded services , and the right to receive care in a government funded hospital or other any other medical facility .
“ H.R .
6666 specifically allows for funded entities to home quarantine a person against their will , even while they are healthy .
Once a vaccine is available , the testing and tracing results potentially could be used to force individuals to be injected with a COVID-19 vaccine against their will.
” As noted by NVIC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Nothing in this section shall be construed to supersede any Federal privacy or confidentiality requirement , including the regulations promulgated under section 264 ( c ) of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 , ” H.R .
6666 in no way guarantees privacy .
HIPAA “ has always allowed disclosure of private health information to government officials and other government approved entities including foreign governments without the knowledge or consent of the individual for the purpose of conducting public health surveillance , investigations or interventions , ” NVIC writes.14 Public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Rights NVIC also highlights the fact that the Bill of Rights in the U.S. Constitution can not be suspended or ignored by state or federal government during public health emergencies .
As noted by the U.S. Department of Justice in a recent Statement of Interest in Support of Plaintiffs in the case of Temple Baptist Church against the City of Greenville and its mayor , which banned drive-in church services and slapped attendees with fines:15 “ There is no pandemic exception , however , to the fundamental liberties the Constitution safeguards .
Indeed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Constitution do not disappear during a public health crisis.
’ In re Abbott , — F.3d — , 2020 WL 1685929 , at *6 ( 5th Cir .
Apr .
7 , 2020 ) .
These individual rights , including the protections in the Bill of Rights made applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment , are always in force and restrain government action.
” Indeed , H.R .
6666 “ sets the stage for multiple violations of our constitutional rights , ” NVIC notes , including the Fourth , Fifth , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fourth Amendment16 right of American citizens is to be secure in their persons , houses , papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures .
As explained by NVIC : “ The bill does not allow individuals to exercise their Constitutional right to be safe in their homes free from warrantless government intrusion , and does not provide for voluntary refusal of testing and monitoring by a government funded entity .
The bill also does not set forth how the contacts of persons with COVID-19 will be traced and whether the Constitutional rights @ @ @ @ @ @ @ well as their contacts , will be upheld.
” • The Fifth Amendment17 of the U.S. Constitution guarantees that no person shall be deprived of life , liberty or property , without due process of law .
“ This legislation provides government funding of entities that will enforce testing and potentially enforce vaccination of healthy individuals , who are suspected of having come into contact with COVID-19 positive persons whether or not they are exhibiting symptoms , without requiring the voluntary consent of the individual , ” NVIC writes .
• The Eighth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ citizens .
In this case , as noted by NVIC : “ The proposed law provides government funding to entities that will create and implement programs that trace , monitor and support the enforced quarantine of healthy individuals , who are suspected of coming into contact with COVID-19 persons , whether or not they are exhibiting symptoms and whether or not they may already be immune.
” • The 9th Amendment19 of the U.S. Constitution bestows upon the people rights not specifically set forth in the Constitution .
“ H.R .
6666 provides @ @ @ @ @ @ @ undefined ‘ related activities ’ to COVID-19 testing and unnamed ‘ other purposes.
’ ” “ H.R .
6666 should be opposed because it provides federal funding to entities to create and enforce unrestricted surveillance , testing , tracing and quarantine mechanisms and has no set end date .
“ There is simply no way to know how many inalienable rights protected under the U.S. Constitution could be infringed upon or taken away from citizens if this bill becomes law , ” NVIC says .
I urge you to take action today and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Call and email your U.S. congressional representative and ask them to vote against H.R .
6666 , the “ COVID–19 Testing , Reaching , And Contacting Everyone ( TRACE ) Act.
” Feel free to select a few salient points to personalize your message .
Keep in mind that many staffers are still working remotely , so be prepared to leave a coherent phone message .
If you ’ re unsure who your representative is , or don ’ t have their contact information , you can look them up on the NVIC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your zip code and click on the names listed to get their contact information .
If you happen to live near a district office , you may also consider setting up a longer phone call , video chat or face-to-face meeting with your representative or staff .
The nonprofit National Vaccine Information Center ( NVIC ) is the largest and oldest consumer-led organization in the U.S. disseminating information on vaccines and infectious diseases and advocating for protection of the legal right to make voluntary vaccination decisions .
NVIC researches and publishes referenced information @ @ @ @ @ @ @ points when you speak with your legislators .
I urge you to register as a user of the free online NVIC Advocacy Portal so you can receive timely email Action Alerts from NVIC tailored to your state and access state and federal legislation action items and updates on the Portal website .
NVIC constantly reviews and updates the status of pending vaccine-related bills so you can take action to protect your rights .
“ Bills can change many times over the legislative process and your timely visits , calls , and emails directed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this process , ” NVIC writes .
Lastly , take a moment to forward this newsletter to your friends and family , and ask them to share their concerns with their elected representatives as well .
From the author : The existing medical establishment is responsible for killing and permanently injuring millions of Americans , but the surging numbers of visitors to Mercola.com since I began the site in 1997 – we are now routinely among the top 10 health sites on the Internet – convinces me that you , too , are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ want practical health solutions without the hype , and that ’ s what I offer .

As if jjab passports, COVID-19 contact tracing apps and the Rockefeller Foundation’s plan to reopen America don’t already pose enough of a threat to civil liberties and democratic society, here comes a new bill, H.R. 6666, the COVID-19 Testing, Reaching And Contacting Everyone (TRACE) Act.1
The bill was introduced and referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce by Rep. Bobby Rush, D-Ill., May 1, 2020. As of May 25, 2020, the bill has 64 cosponsors — all Democrats.
Originally, there also was one Republican, but he withdrew his sponsorship May 15. According to the summary of the bill:2
“This bill authorizes the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to award grants for testing, contact tracing, monitoring, and other activities to address COVID-19 (i.e., coronavirus disease 2019).
Entities such as federally qualified health centers, nonprofit organizations, and certain hospitals and schools are eligible to receive such grants.
In awarding the grants, the CDC shall prioritize applicants that (1) operate in hot spots and medically underserved communities, and (2) agree to hire individuals from the communities where grant activities occur.”
H.R. 6666 — A ‘Monstrously Unconstitutional’ Bill
Needless to say, many an eyebrow are being raised over the “6666” in the resolution. It seems both unfortunate and ironically apt. As noted by Cheryl Chumley in a May 12, 2020, Washington Times article:3
“Mark of the beast. Mark of the beast for a beastly, monstrously unconstitutional bill. After all, what’s more devilishly un-American than launching one of the most massive government surveillance programs of private citizens in U.S. history, all under the guise of protecting people from the coronavirus?”
The government grants — a whopping $100 billion of taxpayer money for 2020 alone — would be used by “eligible entities” to hire employees and buy the supplies needed to conduct testing and contact tracing.
This includes sending employees to the residences of citizens to conduct COVID-19 testing.
Entities eligible for grant money include federally qualified health centers, school-based clinics, disproportionate share hospitals, academic medical centers, nonprofit organizations, institutions of higher education, high schools and any other entities determined to be eligible by the Health and Human Services Secretary.
If you test positive, you would then be quarantined either at a mobile health unit or in your own home.
Contact tracers would also collect information about anyone you may have come into contact with so that they can be tested and, if needed, quarantined.
As noted by Chumley, just how the government intends to ensure compliance with quarantine remains an unanswered question.
We now know that up to 80% of people who test positive remain asymptomatic,4 and for people who feel fine, being locked up, whether at home or in a mobile unit, for two weeks or more may not be a welcome proposition at this point.
COVID-19 Does Not Warrant Proposed Tracking Measures
In a nutshell, H.R. 6666 calls for taking $100 billion of our taxpayer money to fund our own persecution.
I say “persecution,” considering this virus isn’t particularly lethal for people under the age of 80, and has an overall survival rate of about 99% and therefore doesn’t pose a significant threat for the vast majority of the population.
At present, most data are still unreliable, seeing how “suspected” cases are lumped into mortality statistics. But two situations for which we have more complete data suggest the risk from SARS-CoV-2 is minimal.
For example, of the roughly 4,800 crew on the U.S. aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt, 840 tested positive,5 but 60% were asymptomatic,6 meaning they had no symptoms. Only one crewmember died.7
Similarly, among the 3,711 passengers and crew onboard the Diamond Princess cruise ship, 712 (19.2%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, and of these 46.5% were asymptomatic at the time of testing. Of those showing symptoms, only 9.7% required intensive care and 1.3% (nine) died.8
Military personnel, as you would expect, tend to be healthier than the general population. Still, the data from these two incidents reveal several important points to consider.
First of all, it suggests that even when living in close, crowded quarters, the infection rate is low.
Only 17.5% of the USS Theodore Roosevelt crew got infected — slightly lower than the 19.2% of those onboard the Diamond Princess, which had a greater ratio of older people.
Second, fit and healthy individuals are more likely to be asymptomatic than not — 60% of naval personnel compared to 46.5% of civilians onboard the Diamond Princess had no symptoms despite testing positive.
‘Devilish’ in Its Substance
While H.R. 6666 may not be satanic, it’s certainly “devilish,” Bob Barr writes in a May 20, 2020, Marietta Daily Journal op-ed.9 Barr, president and CEO of the Law Enforcement Education Foundation, is a former U.S. Congressman for Georgia’s Seventh District.
“Make no mistake … the bill is a dangerous piece of legislation, not because of its number, but because of its substance,” Barr writes. “It is the latest in a long line of legislative vehicles … to increase the federal government’s power to gather and database private information on citizens …
“In this latest effort, House Democrats have employed the tradecraft for which the Congress has become notoriously adept — hiding the true purpose of legislation behind a façade of protecting people from a known or perceived danger …
“The specific provisions within H.R. 6666 pose a very real danger; not only as a stand-alone bill … but as a possible amendment that could be slipped into the most recent, massive COVID-19 ‘stimulus’ bill that passed the House last week.
“The administration already has signaled support for some version of a Phase IV relief package, and whatever that final document looks like, it is certain to be long and complicated, making it a perfect vehicle in which to hide a provision for ‘contact tracing’ similar perhaps to what Rush’s TRACE Act would do …
“Those of us who are concerned about the growth of government surveillance and data-basing of personal information must be vigilant against measures like the TRACE Act, regardless of their surface appeal. We must demand the Congress and the Administration aggressively oppose any such measures.”
WARNING: Apple, Android Updates Include API for Tracing Apps
Considering the latest iPhone and Android updates make the phones contact-tracing ready, the bill has, in pragmatic terms, already come to pass.
As reported by Global World Trends,10 Apple’s iOS 13.5 update contains a built-in Exposure Notifications API, which will “allow governments and public health agencies to develop apps that alert you if you’ve come into contact with someone who later tests positive for Covid-19 and that person anonymously logs their positive result into a database.”
API stands for “application programming interface.”11 It’s essentially a set of functions that allow apps to access certain data or features of the operating system. That said, you would still have to download a contact tracing app in order to participate in a contact tracing program, according to an Apple representative.12
HR 6666 Sets Us on a Dangerous Path
As detailed by the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) in a recent “Action Alert” emailed to users of NVIC’s Advocacy Portal:13
“H.R. 6666 is a federal funding bill. It proposes to create a surveillance infrastructure that can be used by the federal government, as well as local and state governments and private businesses, to require medical testing and tracking of all citizens.
“This is in violation of fundamental civil liberties as set forth in the Bill of Rights, which include the first 10 amendments to the U.S. Constitution designed to protect individual rights and limit the power of the government.
“H.R. 6666 lacks safeguards and conditions related to funding of the proposed surveillance operation to prevent it from being applied to intrusive programs mandating testing and surveillance without an individual’s voluntary consent.
“If this legislation is passed by Congress and enacted into law, it could lead to denial of an individual’s right to appear in public spaces and travel; the right to employment and education or participation in government-funded services, and the right to receive care in a government funded hospital or other any other medical facility.
“H.R. 6666 specifically allows for funded entities to home quarantine a person against their will, even while they are healthy. Once a jjab is available, the testing and tracing results potentially could be used to force individuals to be injected with a COVID-19 jjab against their will.”
As noted by NVIC, while the bill specifies that “Nothing in this section shall be construed to supersede any Federal privacy or confidentiality requirement, including the regulations promulgated under section 264(c) of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996,” H.R. 6666 in no way guarantees privacy.
HIPAA “has always allowed disclosure of private health information to government officials and other government approved entities including foreign governments without the knowledge or consent of the individual for the purpose of conducting public health surveillance, investigations or interventions,” NVIC writes.14
Public Health Crisis Does Not Suspend Bill of Rights
NVIC also highlights the fact that the Bill of Rights in the U.S. Constitution cannot be suspended or ignored by state or federal government during public health emergencies.
As noted by the U.S. Department of Justice in a recent Statement of Interest in Support of Plaintiffs in the case of Temple Baptist Church against the City of Greenville and its mayor, which banned drive-in church services and slapped attendees with fines:15
“There is no pandemic exception, however, to the fundamental liberties the Constitution safeguards. Indeed, ‘individual rights secured by the Constitution do not disappear during a public health crisis.’
In re Abbott, — F.3d —, 2020 WL 1685929, at *6 (5th Cir. Apr. 7, 2020). These individual rights, including the protections in the Bill of Rights made applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, are always in force and restrain government action.”
Indeed, H.R. 6666 “sets the stage for multiple violations of our constitutional rights,” NVIC notes, including the Fourth, Fifth, Eighth and Ninth amendments:
• The Fourth Amendment16 right of American citizens is to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures. As explained by NVIC:
“The bill does not allow individuals to exercise their Constitutional right to be safe in their homes free from warrantless government intrusion, and does not provide for voluntary refusal of testing and monitoring by a government funded entity.
The bill also does not set forth how the contacts of persons with COVID-19 will be traced and whether the Constitutional rights of those infected with COVID-19, as well as their contacts, will be upheld.”
• The Fifth Amendment17 of the U.S. Constitution guarantees that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law.
“This legislation provides government funding of entities that will enforce testing and potentially enforce vaccination of healthy individuals, who are suspected of having come into contact with COVID-19 positive persons whether or not they are exhibiting symptoms, without requiring the voluntary consent of the individual,” NVIC writes.
• The Eighth Amendment18 prohibits cruel and unusual punishment of citizens. In this case, as noted by NVIC:
“The proposed law provides government funding to entities that will create and implement programs that trace, monitor and support the enforced quarantine of healthy individuals, who are suspected of coming into contact with COVID-19 persons, whether or not they are exhibiting symptoms and whether or not they may already be immune.”
• The 9th Amendment19 of the U.S. Constitution bestows upon the people rights not specifically set forth in the Constitution.
“H.R. 6666 provides funding for entities to create and implement undefined ‘related activities’ to COVID-19 testing and unnamed ‘other purposes.’”
Take Action Today!
“H.R. 6666 should be opposed because it provides federal funding to entities to create and enforce unrestricted surveillance, testing, tracing and quarantine mechanisms and has no set end date.
“There is simply no way to know how many inalienable rights protected under the U.S. Constitution could be infringed upon or taken away from citizens if this bill becomes law,” NVIC says.
I urge you to take action today and help us stop this nasty bill. Call and email your U.S. congressional representative and ask them to vote against H.R. 6666, the “COVID–19 Testing, Reaching, And Contacting Everyone (TRACE) Act.”
Feel free to select a few salient points to personalize your message. Keep in mind that many staffers are still working remotely, so be prepared to leave a coherent phone message.
If you’re unsure who your representative is, or don’t have their contact information, you can look them up on the NVIC’s Advocacy Portal.
Just enter your zip code and click on the names listed to get their contact information. If you happen to live near a district office, you may also consider setting up a longer phone call, video chat or face-to-face meeting with your representative or staff.
The nonprofit National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) is the largest and oldest consumer-led organization in the U.S. disseminating information on jjabs and infectious diseases and advocating for protection of the legal right to make voluntary vaccination decisions.
NVIC researches and publishes referenced information you can trust and use for talking points when you speak with your legislators.
I urge you to register as a user of the free online NVIC Advocacy Portal so you can receive timely email Action Alerts from NVIC tailored to your state and access state and federal legislation action items and updates on the Portal website.
NVIC constantly reviews and updates the status of pending jjab-related bills so you can take action to protect your rights.
“Bills can change many times over the legislative process and your timely visits, calls, and emails directed at the correct legislators are critical to this process,” NVIC writes.
Lastly, take a moment to forward this newsletter to your friends and family, and ask them to share their concerns with their elected representatives as well.
By Dr. Joseph Mercola
From the author: The existing medical establishment is responsible for killing and permanently injuring millions of Americans, but the surging numbers of visitors to Mercola.com since I began the site in 1997 – we are now routinely among the top 10 health sites on the Internet – convinces me that you, too, are fed up with their deception. You want practical health solutions without the hype, and that’s what I offer.
References:


humansarefree--2020-06-12--Taking a Knee is a Masonic Ritual – This is the Meaning

So as we watch the Psy-op of the George Floyd police murder carry out we entered a new faze earlier this week as everyone was being requested by the protesters to take a knee in remembrance of George Floyd and if you are white to accept your white privilege by kneeling down in support of those less fortunate that they were not born into a white privileged life .
You are probably wondering why so many police officers are freely taking to one knee a ’ la Colin Kaepernick back in 2015 during the NFL Season .
Did you know @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Do It ” Is Luciferian You will need to watch this video , but art of the answer is that MOSTLY all Police Officers are either members or are aware of the Freemasonic Order and ‘ taking a knee ’ in the Secretive Masonic Lodge is nothing new to Masons .
In my opinion the majority of people taking to ‘ one knee ’ have no idea who they are really sending prayer and energy to , but it has nothing to do with white privilege .
Must-read : The Complete History of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ New World Order

So as we watch the Psy-op of the George Floyd police murder carry out we entered a new faze earlier this week as everyone was being requested by the protesters to take a knee in remembrance of George Floyd and if you are white to accept your white privilege by kneeling down in support of those less fortunate that they were not born into a white privileged life.
You are probably wondering why so many police officers are freely taking to one knee a’la Colin Kaepernick back in 2015 during the NFL Season.
Did you know? Nike’s Slogan “Just Do It” Is Luciferian
You will need to watch this video, but art of the answer is that MOSTLY all Police Officers are either members or are aware of the Freemasonic Order and ‘taking a knee’ in the Secretive Masonic Lodge is nothing new to Masons.
In my opinion the majority of people taking to ‘one knee’ have no idea who they are really sending prayer and energy to, but it has nothing to do with white privilege.
Must-read: The Complete History of the Freemasonry and the Creation of the New World Order
Reference: YouTube.com


humansarefree--2020-06-11--Bolsonaro: Brazil to Consider Leaving World Health Organization

BRASILIA ( Reuters ) – Brazil ’ s President Jair Bolsonaro said on Tuesday that he will consider pulling the @ @ @ @ @ Health Organization once the coronavirus pandemic has passed .
Speaking to CNN Brasil , Bolsonaro @ @ @ @ @ acted responsibly and has lost a lot of credibility , repeating recent criticism of what @ @ @ @ @ a “ partisan political organization.
” Did you know ?
W.H.O .
Director Has Strong @ @ @ @ @ Clinton Foundation , Dr. Fauci , China And Genocide

BRASILIA (Reuters) – Brazil’s President Jair Bolsonaro said on Tuesday that he will consider pulling the country out of the World Health Organization once the coronavirus pandemic has passed.
Speaking to CNN Brasil, Bolsonaro said the WHO has not acted responsibly and has lost a lot of credibility, repeating recent criticism of what he claimed last week is a “partisan political organization.”
Did you know? W.H.O. Director Has Strong Ties To Billy Boy, Clinton Foundation, Dr. Fauci, China And Genocide
Source: Reuters.com


humansarefree--2020-06-11--Obama Foundation Tweeted About George Floyd A Week Before His Supposed Murder

We have now confirmed that the Obama Foundation was tweeting about George Floyd on May 17th , more than a week before the day Floyd was reportedly killed by police in an act of violence that sparked the worldwide riots we ’ re all witnessing .
George Floyd was killed on May 25th .
So what was the Obama Foundation doing tweeting about Floyd on May 17th , when nobody knew who he was ?
UPDATE : Some people are saying that Twitter retroactively alters images from the history of your timeline when the source URL changes its image .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ is that the Twitter URL validator was used by the Obama Foundation to validate this image on May 17th , in advance of releasing it publicly .
Thus , the image was VALIDATED more than a week before Floyd ’ s claimed death .
This , combined with the new video analysis that claims George Floyd ’ s death was faked using crisis actors , raise serious questions about the authenticity of this event , which appears to have been planned and carried out for political purposes , right in time for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ picture is only a tiny fragment in the larger picture that is now emerging of a pre-planned false flag event .
In fact , there is growing evidence that George Floyd isn ’ t even dead .
We ’ ll cover more on that later .
We ’ ve already documented the fact that actors are now posing as cops as part of a rioting psyop ( psychological operation ) that ’ s being used to brainwash more people into supporting the communist uprising .
YouTube is now banning all videos that discuss @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on May 17th , and Facebook has made sure that no one can share any link from NaturalNews.com as a further suppression of truthful , independent reporting .
Watch these two videos to confirm this news for yourself :

George Floyd was not killed by police. According to the toxicology report, Floyd died from a concentration of Fentanyl in his blood three times the fatal dose.
Fentanyl is a dangerous opioid 50 times more potent than heroin. You can read the analysis HERE. A link is provided to the autopsy report.
Think about this for a minute. What becomes of a society in which facts do not matter?
The US media, Democrat Party, white liberals, and the sorry excuse for a leftwing are so primed for “white racism” that they jumped to their desired conclusion and egged on riots and looting that resulted in massive property damage in multiple cities, some deaths, many injuries, and much damage to racial relations.
Democrat mayors and governors stood down. Police and National Guard attempting to contain the violence were not supported.
Even the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Trump’s Secretary of Defense accommodated the rioting and looting by undermining President Trump’s stand against it.
Many people’s businesses were wiped out, and in most cases insurance does not cover damage from riots. The politicians and the media are responsible for the billions of dollars the “peaceful protests” cost. Those who suffered the damage should bring class action suits.
When the Minnesota police, who have been falsely charged with George Floyd’s murder, are tried, the jurors will be afraid not to convict. The story is set in stone, and too many powerful interests are committed to it.
The police have already been tried and convicted in the media, and the jurors will fear going against public opinion that the media and white liberals have orchestrated. The effect on police morale and commitment will be devastating.
Already police are standing down when faced with crimes committed by “people of color.” Blacks are learning that they have immunity from their violent behavior.
For the criminal element, protests are profit opportunities. Expect more “peaceful protests.”
The extraordinary abuses imposed on the defeated South by Reconstruction poisoned the relations between whites and blacks.
By 1900 Southern politicians, such as James K. Vardaman of Mississippi, in efforts to wrest power from money and the southern aristocracy cultivated racial hatred toward blacks among poor whites and used the electoral process to defeat Southern leaders such as Le Roy Percy who worked for racial harmony.
In our time, this process has been reversed. Now white liberals foment among blacks racial hatred against white people.
White liberals have made up a false history, symbolized by the New York Times’ 1619 Project, that the United States is based on white racism.
This history is now institutionalized in the educational system and the media, which means that the rift between whites and blacks can only worsen.
Identity Politics, the official ideology of the Democrat Party and of what passes for a leftwing, disunites the population.
Americans are divided into hostile groups by race, gender, and sexual preference. Neither the Democrats nor the left any longer represent the working class, now defined as the enemy — “the Trump deplorables.”
By disuniting Americans, the ruling elites have made effective opposition to them impossible.
As disunity serves the interests of the ruling elites, they will ensure that it continues. We can expect more cultivation of racial animosity.
Can we hope that responsible elements in the black population will step forward and unite with white counterparts to produce the amity among races that a multicultural society requires?
Any black American who attempted such leadership would be dismissed as an “uncle Tom” in service to white racism.
Facts no longer matter in the US or in the Western World. Factual accounts that do not satisfy the woke emotions are dismissed as racist or sexist or some other form of sin. In other words, truth in America has lost its power.

It is no longer possible to combat destructive ideologies with truth. You can test this yourself. Try to convince CNN, New York Times, NPR, a white liberal professor, a member of Antifa, or a black protester that George Floyd killed himself by over-dosing on a dangerous opioid.
They will dismiss the toxicology report as a coverup of racist police violence against blacks, and they will dismiss you as a racist white supremacist.
The racist interpretation of America is designed to build anger among blacks and guilt among whites. As black hostility rises and white confidence declines, the society unravels.
As I have written, the US and the entirety of the Western World are living The Camp of the Saints.
By Paul Craig Roberts, Guest writer


humansarefree--2020-06-11--Engineering a Race War: Will This Be the American Police State’s Reichstag Fire?

“ Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
” — George Santayana Watch and see : this debate over police brutality and accountability is about to get politicized into an election-year referendum on who should occupy the White House .
The Deep State , the powers-that-be , want us to turn this into a race war , but this is about so much more than systemic racism .
This is the oldest con game in the books , the magician ’ s sleight of hand that keeps you focused on the shell game in front @ @ @ @ @ @ @ picked clean by ruffians in your midst .
It ’ s the Reichstag Fire all over again .
It was February 1933 , a month before national elections in Germany , and the Nazis weren ’ t expected to win .
So they engineered a way to win : they began by infiltrating the police and granting police powers to their allies ; then Hitler brought in stormtroopers to act as auxiliary police ; by the time an arsonist ( who claimed to be working for the Communists in the hopes of starting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Reichstag , the German parliamentary building , the people were eager for a return to law and order .
That was all it took : Hitler used the attempted “ coup ” as an excuse to declare martial law and seize absolute power in Germany , establishing himself as a dictator with the support of the German people .
Fast forward to the present day , and what do we have ?
The nation in turmoil after months of pandemic fear-mongering and regional lockdowns , a national election looming , a president @ @ @ @ @ @ @ police state that wants to stay in power at all costs .
It ’ s entirely possible that Americans have finally reached a tipping point over police brutality after decades of abuse .
After all , until recently , the legislatures and the courts have marched in lockstep with the police state , repeatedly rebuffing efforts to hold police accountable for official misconduct .
Then again , it ’ s also equally possible that the architects of the police state have every intention of manipulating this outrage for their own purposes .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ As author Jim Keith explains , “ Create violence through economic pressures , the media , mind control , agent provocateurs : thesis .
Counter it with totalitarian measures , more mind control , police crackdowns , surveillance , drugging of the population : antithesis .
What ensues is Orwell ’ s vision of 1984 , a society of total control : synthesis.
” Here ’ s what is going to happen : the police state is going to stand down and allow these protests , riots and looting to devolve into a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is so desperate for a return to law and order that they will gladly relinquish some of their freedoms to achieve it .
And that ’ s how the police state will win , no matter which candidate gets elected to the White House .
You know who will lose ?
Every last one of us .
Listen , people should be outraged over what happened to George Floyd , but let ’ s get one thing straight : Floyd didn ’ t die merely because he was black and the cop who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because America is being overrun with warrior cops — vigilantes with a badge — who are part of a government-run standing army that is waging war on the American people in the so-called name of law and order .
Not all cops are warrior cops , trained to act as judge , jury and executioner in their interactions with the populace .
Unfortunately , the good cops — the ones who take seriously their oath of office to serve and protect their fellow citizens , uphold the Constitution , and maintain the peace @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who believe the lives — and rights — of police should be valued more than citizens .
These warrior cops may get paid by the citizenry , but they don ’ t work for us and they certainly aren ’ t operating within the limits of the U.S. Constitution .
This isn ’ t about racism in America .
This is about profit-driven militarism packaged in the guise of law and order , waged by greedy profiteers who have transformed the American homeland into a battlefield with militarized police , military weapons and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This is systemic corruption predicated on the police state ’ s insatiable appetite for money , power and control .
This is a military coup waiting to happen .
Why do we have more than a million cops on the taxpayer-funded payroll in this country whose jobs do not entail protecting our safety , maintaining the peace in our communities , and upholding our liberties ?
I ’ ll tell you why .
These warrior cops — fitted out in the trappings of war , drilled in the deadly art of combat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ every individual they interact with as an armed threat and every situation as a deadly force encounter in the making — are the police state ’ s standing army .
This is the new face of war , and America has become the new battlefield .
Militarized police officers , the end product of the government — federal , local and state — and law enforcement agencies having merged , have become a “ standing ” or permanent army , composed of full-time professional soldiers who do not disband .
Yet these permanent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights feared as tools used by despotic governments to wage war against its citizens .
American police forces were never supposed to be a branch of the military , nor were they meant to be private security forces for the reigning political faction .
Instead , they were intended to be an aggregation of countless local police units , composed of citizens like you and me that exist for a sole purpose : to serve and protect the citizens of each and every American community .
As @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the police in recent years , however , the police now not only look like the military — with their foreboding uniforms and phalanx of lethal weapons — but they function like them , as well .
Thus , no more do we have a civilian force of peace officers entrusted with serving and protecting the American people .
Instead , today ’ s militarized law enforcement officials have shifted their allegiance from the citizenry to the state , acting preemptively to ward off any possible challenges to the government ’ s power @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fourth Amendment .
They don ’ t work for us .
As retired Philadelphia Police Captain Ray Lewis warned , “ Corporate America is using police forces as their mercenaries.
” We were sold a bill of goods .
For years now , we ’ ve been told that cops need military weapons to wage the government ’ s wars on drugs , crime and terror .
We ’ ve been told that cops need to be able to crash through doors , search vehicles , carry out roadside strip searches , shoot @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and generally disregard the law whenever it suits them because they ’ re doing it to protect their fellow Americans from danger .
We ’ ve been told that cops need extra legal protections because of the risks they take .
None of that is true .
In fact , a study by a political scientist at Princeton University concludes that militarizing police and SWAT teams “ provide no detectable benefits in terms of officer safety or violent crime reduction.
” According to researcher Jonathan Mummolo , if police in America are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because the process of transforming them into extensions of the military makes them less safe , less popular and less trust-worthy .
The study , the first systematic analysis on the use and consequences of militarized force , reveals that “ police militarization neither reduces rates of violent crime nor changes the number of officers assaulted or killed.
” In other words , warrior cops aren ’ t making us or themselves any safer .
Militarized police armed with weapons of war who are allowed to operate above the law and break the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ America any safer or freer .
The problem , as one reporter rightly concluded , is “ not that life has gotten that much more dangerous , it ’ s that authorities have chosen to respond to even innocent situations as if they were in a warzone.
” Consequently , Americans are now eight times more likely to die in a police confrontation than they are to be killed by a terrorist .
Militarism within the nation ’ s police forces is proving to be deadlier than any pandemic .
This battlefield mindset @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rise of militarized SWAT ( “ special weapons and tactics ” ) teams .
Frequently justified as vital tools necessary to combat terrorism and deal with rare but extremely dangerous criminal situations , such as those involving hostages , SWAT teams have become intrinsic parts of local law enforcement operations , thanks in large part to substantial federal assistance and the Pentagon ’ s military surplus recycling program , which allows the transfer of military equipment , weapons and training to local police for free or at sharp discounts while increasing the profits @ @ @ @ @ @ @ becomes a problem of life and death for Americans is when these SWAT teams — outfitted , armed and trained in military tactics — are assigned to carry out relatively routine police tasks , such as serving a search warrant .
Nationwide , SWAT teams have been employed to address an astonishingly trivial array of criminal activity or mere community nuisances : angry dogs , domestic disputes , improper paperwork filed by an orchid farmer , and misdemeanor marijuana possession , to give a brief sampling .
Remember , SWAT teams originated as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , dangerous situations .
They were never meant to be used for routine police work such as serving a warrant .
Unfortunately , the mere presence of SWAT units has actually injected a level of danger and violence into police-citizen interactions that was not present as long as these interactions were handled by traditional civilian officers .
There are few communities without a SWAT team today , and there are more than 80,000 SWAT team raids per year .
Yet the tension inherent in most civilian-police encounter these days can ’ t be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ growing reliance on SWAT teams and donated military equipment .
It goes far deeper , to a transformation in the way police view themselves and their line of duty .
Specifically , what we ’ re dealing with today is a skewed shoot-to-kill mindset in which police , trained to view themselves as warriors or soldiers in a war , whether against drugs , or terror , or crime , must “ get ” the bad guys — i.e.
, anyone who is a potential target — before the bad guys get them @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the number of incidents in which police shoot first , and ask questions later .
Making matters worse , when these officers , who have long since ceased to be peace officers , violate their oaths by bullying , beating , tasering , shooting and killing their employers—the taxpayers to whom they owe their allegiance—they are rarely given more than a slap on the hands before resuming their patrols .
This lawlessness on the part of law enforcement , an unmistakable characteristic of a police state , is made possible in large part @ @ @ @ @ @ @ review boards and resist the placement of names and badge numbers on officer uniforms ; police agencies that abide by the Blue Code of Silence , the quiet understanding among police that they should not implicate their colleagues for their crimes and misconduct ; prosecutors who treat police offenses with greater leniency than civilian offenses ; courts that sanction police wrongdoing in the name of security ; and legislatures that enhance the power , reach and arsenal of the police , and a citizenry that fails to hold its government accountable to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ only are cops protected from most charges of wrongdoing — whether it ’ s shooting unarmed citizens ( including children and old people ) , raping and abusing young women , falsifying police reports , trafficking drugs , or soliciting sex with minors — but even on the rare occasions when they are fired for misconduct , it ’ s only a matter of time before they get re-hired again .
Much of the “ credit ” for shielding these rogue cops goes to influential police unions and laws providing for qualified immunity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shield of protection to officers accused of misdeeds and erect barriers to residents complaining of abuse , ” state and federal laws that allow police to walk away without paying a dime for their wrongdoing , and rampant cronyism among government bureaucrats .
It ’ s happening all across the country .
This is how perverse justice in America has become .
Incredibly , while our own Bill of Rights are torn to shreds , leaving us with few protections against government abuses , a growing number of states are adopting Law Enforcement @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) , which provide cops accused of a crime with special due process rights and privileges not afforded to the average citizen .
This , right here , epitomizes everything that is wrong with America today .
Even when the system appears to work on the side of justice , it ’ s the American taxpayer who ends up paying the price .
Because police officers are more likely to be struck by lightning than be held financially accountable for their actions .
As Human Rights Watch explains , taxpayers actually pay three @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : “ once to cover their salaries while they commit abuses ; next to pay settlements or civil jury awards against officers ; and a third time through payments into police ‘ defense ’ funds provided by the cities.
” Deep-seated corruption of this kind doesn ’ t just go away because politicians and corporations suddenly become conscience-stricken in the face of mass protests and start making promises they don ’ t intend to keep .
As I explain in my book Battlefield America : The War on the American People , we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ especially at the local level .
However , if it ends at the ballot box without achieving any real reform that holds government officials at all levels accountable to playing by the rules of the Constitution , then shame on us .

“Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”— George Santayana
Watch and see: this debate over police brutality and accountability is about to get politicized into an election-year referendum on who should occupy the White House.
Don’t fall for it.
The Deep State, the powers-that-be, want us to turn this into a race war, but this is about so much more than systemic racism. This is the oldest con game in the books, the magician’s sleight of hand that keeps you focused on the shell game in front of you while your wallet is being picked clean by ruffians in your midst.
It’s the Reichstag Fire all over again.
It was February 1933, a month before national elections in Germany, and the Nazis weren’t expected to win. So they engineered a way to win: they began by infiltrating the police and granting police powers to their allies; then Hitler brought in stormtroopers to act as auxiliary police; by the time an arsonist (who claimed to be working for the Communists in the hopes of starting an armed revolt) set fire to the Reichstag, the German parliamentary building, the people were eager for a return to law and order.
That was all it took: Hitler used the attempted “coup” as an excuse to declare martial law and seize absolute power in Germany, establishing himself as a dictator with the support of the German people.
Fast forward to the present day, and what do we have? The nation in turmoil after months of pandemic fear-mongering and regional lockdowns, a national election looming, a president with falling poll numbers, and a police state that wants to stay in power at all costs.
Note the similarities?
It’s entirely possible that Americans have finally reached a tipping point over police brutality after decades of abuse. After all, until recently, the legislatures and the courts have marched in lockstep with the police state, repeatedly rebuffing efforts to hold police accountable for official misconduct.
Then again, it’s also equally possible that the architects of the police state have every intention of manipulating this outrage for their own purposes.
It works the same in every age.
As author Jim Keith explains, “Create violence through economic pressures, the media, mind control, agent provocateurs: thesis. Counter it with totalitarian measures, more mind control, police crackdowns, surveillance, drugging of the population: antithesis. What ensues is Orwell’s vision of 1984, a society of total control: synthesis.”
Here’s what is going to happen: the police state is going to stand down and allow these protests, riots and looting to devolve into a situation where enough of the voting populace is so desperate for a return to law and order that they will gladly relinquish some of their freedoms to achieve it. And that’s how the police state will win, no matter which candidate gets elected to the White House.
You know who will lose? Every last one of us.
Listen, people should be outraged over what happened to George Floyd, but let’s get one thing straight: Floyd didn’t die merely because he was black and the cop who killed him is white.
Floyd died because America is being overrun with warrior cops — vigilantes with a badge — who are part of a government-run standing army that is waging war on the American people in the so-called name of law and order.
Not all cops are warrior cops, trained to act as judge, jury and executioner in their interactions with the populace.
Unfortunately, the good cops — the ones who take seriously their oath of office to serve and protect their fellow citizens, uphold the Constitution, and maintain the peace — are increasingly being outnumbered by those who believe the lives — and rights — of police should be valued more than citizens.
These warrior cops may get paid by the citizenry, but they don’t work for us and they certainly aren’t operating within the limits of the U.S. Constitution.
This isn’t about racism in America.
This is about profit-driven militarism packaged in the guise of law and order, waged by greedy profiteers who have transformed the American homeland into a battlefield with militarized police, military weapons and tactics better suited to a war zone. This is systemic corruption predicated on the police state’s insatiable appetite for money, power and control.
This is a military coup waiting to happen.
Why do we have more than a million cops on the taxpayer-funded payroll in this country whose jobs do not entail protecting our safety, maintaining the peace in our communities, and upholding our liberties?
I’ll tell you why.
These warrior cops — fitted out in the trappings of war, drilled in the deadly art of combat, and trained to look upon “every individual they interact with as an armed threat and every situation as a deadly force encounter in the making — are the police state’s standing army.
This is the new face of war, and America has become the new battlefield.
Militarized police officers, the end product of the government — federal, local and state — and law enforcement agencies having merged, have become a “standing” or permanent army, composed of full-time professional soldiers who do not disband.
Yet these permanent armies are exactly what those who drafted the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights feared as tools used by despotic governments to wage war against its citizens.
American police forces were never supposed to be a branch of the military, nor were they meant to be private security forces for the reigning political faction. Instead, they were intended to be an aggregation of countless local police units, composed of citizens like you and me that exist for a sole purpose: to serve and protect the citizens of each and every American community.
As a result of the increasing militarization of the police in recent years, however, the police now not only look like the military — with their foreboding uniforms and phalanx of lethal weapons — but they function like them, as well.
Thus, no more do we have a civilian force of peace officers entrusted with serving and protecting the American people. Instead, today’s militarized law enforcement officials have shifted their allegiance from the citizenry to the state, acting preemptively to ward off any possible challenges to the government’s power, unrestrained by the boundaries of the Fourth Amendment.
They don’t work for us. As retired Philadelphia Police Captain Ray Lewis warned, “Corporate America is using police forces as their mercenaries.”
We were sold a bill of goods.
For years now, we’ve been told that cops need military weapons to wage the government’s wars on drugs, crime and terror.
We’ve been told that cops need to be able to crash through doors, search vehicles, carry out roadside strip searches, shoot anyone they perceive to be a threat, and generally disregard the law whenever it suits them because they’re doing it to protect their fellow Americans from danger. We’ve been told that cops need extra legal protections because of the risks they take.
None of that is true.
In fact, a study by a political scientist at Princeton University concludes that militarizing police and SWAT teams “provide no detectable benefits in terms of officer safety or violent crime reduction.” According to researcher Jonathan Mummolo, if police in America are feeling less safe, it’s because the process of transforming them into extensions of the military makes them less safe, less popular and less trust-worthy.
The study, the first systematic analysis on the use and consequences of militarized force, reveals that “police militarization neither reduces rates of violent crime nor changes the number of officers assaulted or killed.”
In other words, warrior cops aren’t making us or themselves any safer.
Militarized police armed with weapons of war who are allowed to operate above the law and break the laws with impunity are definitely not making America any safer or freer.
The problem, as one reporter rightly concluded, is “not that life has gotten that much more dangerous, it’s that authorities have chosen to respond to even innocent situations as if they were in a warzone.” Consequently, Americans are now eight times more likely to die in a police confrontation than they are to be killed by a terrorist.
Militarism within the nation’s police forces is proving to be deadlier than any pandemic.
This battlefield mindset has gone hand in hand with the rise of militarized SWAT (“special weapons and tactics”) teams.
Frequently justified as vital tools necessary to combat terrorism and deal with rare but extremely dangerous criminal situations, such as those involving hostages, SWAT teams have become intrinsic parts of local law enforcement operations, thanks in large part to substantial federal assistance and the Pentagon’s military surplus recycling program, which allows the transfer of military equipment, weapons and training to local police for free or at sharp discounts while increasing the profits of its corporate allies.
Where this becomes a problem of life and death for Americans is when these SWAT teams — outfitted, armed and trained in military tactics — are assigned to carry out relatively routine police tasks, such as serving a search warrant.
Nationwide, SWAT teams have been employed to address an astonishingly trivial array of criminal activity or mere community nuisances: angry dogs, domestic disputes, improper paperwork filed by an orchid farmer, and misdemeanor marijuana possession, to give a brief sampling.
Remember, SWAT teams originated as specialized units dedicated to defusing extremely sensitive, dangerous situations. They were never meant to be used for routine police work such as serving a warrant.
Unfortunately, the mere presence of SWAT units has actually injected a level of danger and violence into police-citizen interactions that was not present as long as these interactions were handled by traditional civilian officers.
There are few communities without a SWAT team today, and there are more than 80,000 SWAT team raids per year.
Yet the tension inherent in most civilian-police encounter these days can’t be blamed exclusively on law enforcement’s growing reliance on SWAT teams and donated military equipment.
It goes far deeper, to a transformation in the way police view themselves and their line of duty.
Specifically, what we’re dealing with today is a skewed shoot-to-kill mindset in which police, trained to view themselves as warriors or soldiers in a war, whether against drugs, or terror, or crime, must “get” the bad guys — i.e., anyone who is a potential target — before the bad guys get them. The result is a spike in the number of incidents in which police shoot first, and ask questions later.
Making matters worse, when these officers, who have long since ceased to be peace officers, violate their oaths by bullying, beating, tasering, shooting and killing their employers—the taxpayers to whom they owe their allegiance—they are rarely given more than a slap on the hands before resuming their patrols.
This lawlessness on the part of law enforcement, an unmistakable characteristic of a police state, is made possible in large part by police unions which routinely oppose civilian review boards and resist the placement of names and badge numbers on officer uniforms; police agencies that abide by the Blue Code of Silence, the quiet understanding among police that they should not implicate their colleagues for their crimes and misconduct; prosecutors who treat police offenses with greater leniency than civilian offenses; courts that sanction police wrongdoing in the name of security; and legislatures that enhance the power, reach and arsenal of the police, and a citizenry that fails to hold its government accountable to the rule of law.
Indeed, not only are cops protected from most charges of wrongdoing — whether it’s shooting unarmed citizens (including children and old people), raping and abusing young women, falsifying police reports, trafficking drugs, or soliciting sex with minors — but even on the rare occasions when they are fired for misconduct, it’s only a matter of time before they get re-hired again.
Much of the “credit” for shielding these rogue cops goes to influential police unions and laws providing for qualified immunity, police contracts that “provide a shield of protection to officers accused of misdeeds and erect barriers to residents complaining of abuse,” state and federal laws that allow police to walk away without paying a dime for their wrongdoing, and rampant cronyism among government bureaucrats.
It’s happening all across the country.
This is how perverse justice in America has become.
Incredibly, while our own Bill of Rights are torn to shreds, leaving us with few protections against government abuses, a growing number of states are adopting Law Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights (LEOBoR), which provide cops accused of a crime with special due process rights and privileges not afforded to the average citizen.
This, right here, epitomizes everything that is wrong with America today.
Even when the system appears to work on the side of justice, it’s the American taxpayer who ends up paying the price.
Literally.
Because police officers are more likely to be struck by lightning than be held financially accountable for their actions.
As Human Rights Watch explains, taxpayers actually pay three times for officers who repeatedly commit abuses: “once to cover their salaries while they commit abuses; next to pay settlements or civil jury awards against officers; and a third time through payments into police ‘defense’ funds provided by the cities.”
Deep-seated corruption of this kind doesn’t just go away because politicians and corporations suddenly become conscience-stricken in the face of mass protests and start making promises they don’t intend to keep.
As I explain in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, we need civic engagement and citizen activism, especially at the local level. However, if it ends at the ballot box without achieving any real reform that holds government officials at all levels accountable to playing by the rules of the Constitution, then shame on us.


humansarefree--2020-06-12--Change is Coming, The Great Awakening is Happening

In a recent interview with Claudio Grass on the X22 spotlight YouTube channel , Grass says change is coming whether we like it or not .
Not only is the Great Awakening here , but the financial reset to usher in the New World Order is also here .
Grass breaks down the current event of the plandemic and how this event was used to control the people , remove their rights , and to push a new world order using military might .
However , Grass also believes a great awakening is happening now and people are starting to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ change is coming .
Whether we like it or not , the United States as we knew it in January is dead .
But that ’ s a good thing because people are beginning to see the two choices before them : freedom or slavery , and enough are waking up that slavery looks like it could be a thing of the past .
Change is coming .
It ’ s up to us which way this ends .
Governments all over the world are losing control of the narrative .
That means @ @ @ @ @ @ @ own weight as more and more humans wake up from the slumber they ’ ve been put in .
“ The micromanagement done by those central planners is just ridiculous , ” Grass says .
But it ’ s having the opposite effect .
More people than ever are turning away from government in favor of liberty , justice , and freedom .
“ All these restrictions , social distancing and tracing apps… it could be possible that we are going to see a next wave of infections , you know… when they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sociological experiment on a global scale .
At the end of the day , what we are witnessing is a full nationalization of the economy.
” Based on the data , the coronavirus panic was a joke .
People still don ’ t realize this was a huge hoax regardless of the data and evidence that shows it as such .
After the second wave , or possibly at the same time , Grass believes the famines will begin .
This will be another attempt by the government to get people under control @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , its ability to cause crisis after crisis in within the government ’ s hands .
“ We are in the quiet before the storm , ” he says .
“ You have to destroy the old system to create a new one , ” says Grass .
But this change is permanent .
The old system is gone .
How we handle the next few months or year will dictate whether we have a free society or a New World Order .
Grass has faith that the Great Awakening is happening and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ People have to lose faith in the old systems , that ’ s when the system goes down.
” We just need to make sure that once this system goes down , we don ’ t put another one in its place by consenting to be controlled , ruled , and governed once again .
“ Decentralization is always more resilient for everything , ” says Grass .
“ I have always been a fan of decentralization… certain companies can only become as big as they are because they received support from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a huge problem… we will see a reset .
We are seeing a centralized system , centralized even further.
” This is why Grass suggests breaking free of the system , not using their money ( gold , silver , bitcoin ) , and educating yourself on how to localize and work together free from the chains of the ruling class .
“ I think a lot of people are waking up…there is really an awakening ongoing… I truly think people should think about how to opt-out of the system… the people who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be even more enslaved.
” At the end of the day , opting out means you go away from all of the control structures , including government .
You need to stop allowing other people to rule you and control your life .
“ We don ’ t have to decapitate the king .
We can simply ignore him… I ’ m not a government servant , I ’ m not a government slave , ” Grass added .
The main problem in our society today is that people want to rule over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the fact that that ’ s not going to work .
They are tired of being slaves .
Sadly , many will not wake up until it directly impacts them .
As a KGB defector said , “ Americans will not understand until the military boot crushes them.
” Grass is “ positive ” that we will come out on top and be able to topple the New World Order and the control structures that have been in place for centuries .
There will be a big crash , he says .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ banking system , but the crash of all governments .
At that point , it will be up to us to decide if we want no system anymore , one of complete freedom , or the New World Order and enslavement .
There won ’ t be a middle point .
This is an opportunity .
We all need to figure out if we want in the new system or to not participate at all .
“ People are capable to think , at the end of the day .
”

In a recent interview with Claudio Grass on the X22 spotlight YouTube channel, Grass says change is coming whether we like it or not.
Not only is the Great Awakening here, but the financial reset to usher in the New World Order is also here.
Grass breaks down the current event of the plandemic and how this event was used to control the people, remove their rights, and to push a new world order using military might.
However, Grass also believes a great awakening is happening now and people are starting to see what is really happening, and change is coming.
Whether we like it or not, the United States as we knew it in January is dead.
But that’s a good thing because people are beginning to see the two choices before them: freedom or slavery, and enough are waking up that slavery looks like it could be a thing of the past.
Change is coming. It’s up to us which way this ends.
Governments all over the world are losing control of the narrative. That means they will all eventually fall under their own weight as more and more humans wake up from the slumber they’ve been put in.
“The micromanagement done by those central planners is just ridiculous,” Grass says. But it’s having the opposite effect. More people than ever are turning away from government in favor of liberty, justice, and freedom.
“All these restrictions, social distancing and tracing apps… it could be possible that we are going to see a next wave of infections, you know… when they can abuse the flu based on… huge sociological experiment on a global scale. At the end of the day, what we are witnessing is a full nationalization of the economy.”
Based on the data, the coronavirus panic was a joke. People still don’t realize this was a huge hoax regardless of the data and evidence that shows it as such. After the second wave, or possibly at the same time, Grass believes the famines will begin.
This will be another attempt by the government to get people under control. Because of the centralization of industries, its ability to cause crisis after crisis in within the government’s hands.
“We are in the quiet before the storm,” he says.
“You have to destroy the old system to create a new one,” says Grass. But this change is permanent. The old system is gone. How we handle the next few months or year will dictate whether we have a free society or a New World Order. Grass has faith that the Great Awakening is happening and that we will all be free.
“People have to lose faith in the old systems, that’s when the system goes down.”
We just need to make sure that once this system goes down, we don’t put another one in its place by consenting to be controlled, ruled, and governed once again.
“Decentralization is always more resilient for everything,” says Grass.
“I have always been a fan of decentralization… certain companies can only become as big as they are because they received support from government. Decentralized structures prove this is a huge problem… we will see a reset. We are seeing a centralized system, centralized even further.”
This is why Grass suggests breaking free of the system, not using their money (gold, silver, bitcoin), and educating yourself on how to localize and work together free from the chains of the ruling class.
“I think a lot of people are waking up…there is really an awakening ongoing… I truly think people should think about how to opt-out of the system… the people who remain in the system are going to be even more enslaved.”
At the end of the day, opting out means you go away from all of the control structures, including government. You need to stop allowing other people to rule you and control your life.
“We don’t have to decapitate the king. We can simply ignore him… I’m not a government servant, I’m not a government slave,” Grass added.
The main problem in our society today is that people want to rule over others. But people are waking up to the fact that that’s not going to work. They are tired of being slaves. Sadly, many will not wake up until it directly impacts them.
As a KGB defector said, “Americans will not understand until the military boot crushes them.”
Grass is “positive” that we will come out on top and be able to topple the New World Order and the control structures that have been in place for centuries.
There will be a big crash, he says. Not just the crash of the central banking system, but the crash of all governments.
At that point, it will be up to us to decide if we want no system anymore, one of complete freedom, or the New World Order and enslavement.
There won’t be a middle point. This is an opportunity. We all need to figure out if we want in the new system or to not participate at all.
“People are capable to think, at the end of the day.”
By Mac Slavo, Guest writer


humansarefree--2020-06-12--Ex-Monsanto Genetic Engineer Warns About Potential Health Risks of GMO Potatoes

Ken Roseboro is editor and publisher of The Organic & Non-GMO Report , a monthly news magazine that focuses on threats posed by GM foods and the growing non-GMO food trend .
He sat down with Caius Rommens , who was Director of Research at Simplot Plant Sciences from 2000 to 2013 where he led the development of the company ’ s genetically engineered Innate potato .
Over time , Rommens started to have serious doubts about his work and worried about potential health risks from eating the GMO potatoes , which are now sold in 4,000 supermarkets in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ worked at Monsanto as a team leader .
At Simplot , he designed a genetically modified potato that he believed “ was resistant to bruise and late blight , and that could be used to produce French fries that were less colored and less carcinogenic than normal fries .
The following came from this interview with Rommens : Interviewer : The main genetic engineering of the Simplot GMO potatoes…was silencing genes called RNAi .
What are some of the possible negative consequences of silencing genes ?
Rommens : Silencing is not gene-specific .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the silencing construct may be silenced as well .
It is even possible that the silencing that takes place inside the GM potatoes affects the genes of animals eating these GM potatoes .
I am most concerned about bees that don ’ t eat GM potatoes but may use GM potato pollen to feed their larvae .
Based on my assessment of the literature , it appears that the silencing constructs are active in pollen .
He is telling us that silencing the PRO ( polyphenol oxidase , a gene responsible for browning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ accumulate within the GMO potatoes .
Interviewer : Why are these toxins are produced and what effects they could have on human health ?
Rommens : Ex-colleagues of mine had shown that PPO-silencing increases the levels of alpha-aminoadipate by about six-fold .
Alpha-aminoadipate is a neurotoxin , it can also react with sugars to produce advanced glycoxidation prouducts implicated in a variety of diseases .
This is obviously concerning , and makes one wonder how these ‘ things ’ were approved for human consumption .
In 2009 , an application for the approval @ @ @ @ @ @ @ LY038 , was denied in Europe after regulators there found it to have high concentrations of alpha-aminoadipate .
Rommens : Similarly , ex-colleagues had shown that the damaged and bruised tissues of potatoes may accumulate high levels of tyramine , another toxin .
Such damaged tissues are normally identified and trimmed , but they are concealed , or partially concealed , and much of it is not trimmed in GM potatoes .
Therefore , it seems important that Simplot should determine the full spectrum of possible tyramine levels in their GM potatoes .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ is little known about this compound , but ex-colleagues had shown that it is increased by almost 200 percent upon PPO-silencing .
This should probably be investigated .

Ken Roseboro is editor and publisher of The Organic & Non-GMO Report, a monthly news magazine that focuses on threats posed by GM foods and the growing non-GMO food trend. He sat down with Caius Rommens, who was Director of Research at Simplot Plant Sciences from 2000 to 2013 where he led the development of the company’s genetically engineered Innate potato.
Over time, Rommens started to have serious doubts about his work and worried about potential health risks from eating the GMO potatoes, which are now sold in 4,000 supermarkets in the United States. Prior to this he worked at Monsanto as a team leader.
At Simplot, he designed a genetically modified potato that he believed “was resistant to bruise and late blight, and that could be used to produce French fries that were less colored and less carcinogenic than normal fries.
The following came from this interview with Rommens:
Interviewer: The main genetic engineering of the Simplot GMO potatoes…was silencing genes called RNAi. What are some of the possible negative consequences of silencing genes?
Rommens: Silencing is not gene-specific. Any gene with a similar structure to the silencing construct may be silenced as well. It is even possible that the silencing that takes place inside the GM potatoes affects the genes of animals eating these GM potatoes. I am most concerned about bees that don’t eat GM potatoes but may use GM potato pollen to feed their larvae. Based on my assessment of the literature, it appears that the silencing constructs are active in pollen.
He is telling us that silencing the PRO (polyphenol oxidase, a gene responsible for browning in potatoes) gene increases toxins that accumulate within the GMO potatoes.
Interviewer: Why are these toxins are produced and what effects they could have on human health?
Rommens: Ex-colleagues of mine had shown that PPO-silencing increases the levels of alpha-aminoadipate by about six-fold. Alpha-aminoadipate is a neurotoxin, it can also react with sugars to produce advanced glycoxidation prouducts implicated in a variety of diseases.
This is obviously concerning, and makes one wonder how these ‘things’ were approved for human consumption. In 2009, an application for the approval of a Monsanto GM corn variety, LY038, was denied in Europe after regulators there found it to have high concentrations of alpha-aminoadipate.
Rommens: Similarly, ex-colleagues had shown that the damaged and bruised tissues of potatoes may accumulate high levels of tyramine, another toxin. Such damaged tissues are normally identified and trimmed, but they are concealed, or partially concealed, and much of it is not trimmed in GM potatoes.
Therefore, it seems important that Simplot should determine the full spectrum of possible tyramine levels in their GM potatoes. Another potential toxin is chaconine-malonyl. There is little known about this compound, but ex-colleagues had shown that it is increased by almost 200 percent upon PPO-silencing. This should probably be investigated.


humansarefree--2020-06-12--Another Nurse Exposes Hospitals ‘Treating’ Covid Patients (It’s Murder)

Erin Marie Olszewski is a Nurse-turned-investigative journalist , who has spent the last few months on the frontlines of the coronavirus pandemic , on the inside in two radically different settings .
Two hospitals .
One private , the other public .
One in Florida , the other in New York .
And not just any New York public hospital , but the “ epicenter of the epicenter ” itself , the infamous Elmhurst in Donald Trump ’ s Queens .
As a result of these diametrically opposed experiences , she has the ultimate “ perspective on the pandemic ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been the most deaths attributed to Covid-19 and where there have been the least .
Erin enlisted in the Army when she was 17 .
She deployed in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2003 .
Part of her duties involved overseeing aid disbursement and improvements to hospital facilities .
While in country she received the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service , and was wounded in combat .
Erin eventually retired as a sergeant , and became a civilian nurse in 2012 .
Erin is a medical freedom and informed consent advocate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but no longer has any connection with the organization .
Nevada Nurse In NYC : COVID Is NOT Killing People – They ’ re Being Murdered

Erin Marie Olszewski is a Nurse-turned-investigative journalist, who has spent the last few months on the frontlines of the coronavirus pandemic, on the inside in two radically different settings. Two hospitals. One private, the other public. One in Florida, the other in New York.
And not just any New York public hospital, but the “epicenter of the epicenter” itself, the infamous Elmhurst in Donald Trump’s Queens.
As a result of these diametrically opposed experiences, she has the ultimate “perspective on the pandemic”. She has been where there have been the most deaths attributed to Covid-19 and where there have been the least.
Erin enlisted in the Army when she was 17. She deployed in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2003. Part of her duties involved overseeing aid disbursement and improvements to hospital facilities.
While in country she received the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service, and was wounded in combat. Erin eventually retired as a sergeant, and became a civilian nurse in 2012.
Erin is a medical freedom and informed consent advocate. She co-founded the Florida Freedom Alliance but no longer has any connection with the organization.
Nevada Nurse In NYC: COVID Is NOT Killing People – They’re Being Murdered
References: YouTube.com; Banned.video


humansarefree--2020-06-13--Seattle Mayor Celebrates “Summer of Love” as Rape and Violent Crime Soars in ‘CHAZ’ Communist Utopia

The Mayor of Seattle celebrated a “ summer of love ” even as rape and violent crime soared in the new “ autonomous zone ” Communist utopia set up by left-wing extremists in a 6 block area of the city .
The Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone , or CHAZ , is a police-free district of Seattle that has been overrun by Black Lives Matter protesters since Monday .
After the police building was boarded up ( with the tacit support of members of the city council ) , the first thing protesters did was to build a border wall and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ leaving ( oh the irony ) .
A local SoundCloud rapper called Raz Simone then appointed himself as “ warlord ” of the area and began making demands of police .
Left-wing extremists then complained that homeless people had taken all their food and requested that people make donations of soy food products .
Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan then appeared on CNN with Chris Cuomo and declared that the occupation could lead to a “ summer of love.
” “ How long do you think Seattle and those few blocks looks like this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ don ’ t know .
We could have a summer of love !
” Durkan responded .
Apparently , this “ summer of love ” will include rape , robbery and other many other violent crimes .
“ Rapes , robberies and all sorts of violent acts have been occurring in the area and we ’ re not able to get to [ them ] , ” warned Seattle ’ s Police Chief .
Crime in the area has risen 300 per cent since the mob took over and police response times are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ accused of wrongdoing are subjected to immediate mob justice , which in this case included them surrounding and interrogating an accused thief .
Looks like their Communist utopia is going exactly as expected !
While President Trump and others have called for the situation to be brought back under control , I say just leave them to it and enjoy watching this ‘ destined for success ’ experiment unfold naturally .

The Mayor of Seattle celebrated a “summer of love” even as rape and violent crime soared in the new “autonomous zone” Communist utopia set up by left-wing extremists in a 6 block area of the city.
The Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone, or CHAZ, is a police-free district of Seattle that has been overrun by Black Lives Matter protesters since Monday.
After the police building was boarded up (with the tacit support of members of the city council), the first thing protesters did was to build a border wall and check the identities of everyone entering and leaving (oh the irony).
A local SoundCloud rapper called Raz Simone then appointed himself as “warlord” of the area and began making demands of police.
A SoundCloud rapper becoming the warlord in an Antifa insurgency-controlled autonomous zone in Seattle is proof we live in a simulation. pic.twitter.com/E15y65kj7K — Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) June 11, 2020
Protesters have put on the barricades that those coming into the area are “now leaving the USA” and entering the “Cap Hill autonomous zone” or “Free Capitol Hill.” pic.twitter.com/zGNBYAyLOg — Julio Rosas (@Julio_Rosas11) June 9, 2020
Left-wing extremists then complained that homeless people had taken all their food and requested that people make donations of soy food products.
Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan then appeared on CNN with Chris Cuomo and declared that the occupation could lead to a “summer of love.”
“How long do you think Seattle and those few blocks looks like this?” Cuomo asked.
“I don’t know. We could have a summer of love!” Durkan responded.
Apparently, this “summer of love” will include rape, robbery and other many other violent crimes.
“Rapes, robberies and all sorts of violent acts have been occurring in the area and we’re not able to get to [them],” warned Seattle’s Police Chief.
Seattle Police Chief: "Rapes, robberies and all sorts of violent acts have been occurring in the area and we're not able to get to [them]." #capitolhillautonomouszone #antifa #BlackLivesMatter pic.twitter.com/Oe5YfVz3uL — Andy Ngô (@MrAndyNgo) June 12, 2020
Crime in the area has risen 300 per cent since the mob took over and police response times are three times longer than normal.
Those accused of wrongdoing are subjected to immediate mob justice, which in this case included them surrounding and interrogating an accused thief.
Looks like their Communist utopia is going exactly as expected!
While President Trump and others have called for the situation to be brought back under control, I say just leave them to it and enjoy watching this ‘destined for success’ experiment unfold naturally.
Source: Summit.news


humansarefree--2020-06-12--Ron Paul: Coronavirus Shows Why We Need Separation of Medicine and State

It seems like only yesterday .
Americans were denied the right to go to their churches .
They were denied the right to visit their loved ones in the hospital .
They were denied the right to open their businesses and go to work to provide for themselves and their families .
They were denied the right to go to restaurants , to bars , to hair salons .
No laws were passed denying these rights .
Even that would be illegal and immoral .
But what happened was worse .
They were denied these basic rights by governors , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who used the coronavirus outbreak as an excuse to rule by decree .
They stole power that was not theirs to take and wielded it at all levels to force America into three months of house arrest .
Then , in the midst of stay-at-home orders across the country , the same governors and local officials who locked Americans in their homes suddenly came around with their keys and threw open the doors .
Suddenly not only was it OK to go out into the street , it was required to go out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ A cure ?
A miraculous vaccine ?
No .
The officials who locked Americans up found a cause they felt required Americans in the streets to protest .
Police had killed a black man , George Floyd , in their custody in Minneapolis and suddenly the need to protest trumped the need to “ stay home , save lives.
” Suddenly the same health “ experts ” who told us we must not gather in crowds or there will be death in the millions from coronavirus issued statements supporting gathering in crowds .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ protests signed by more than 1,200 doctors and other health professionals clarified that they “ do not condemn these gatherings as risky for Covid-19 transmission.
” However , they wrote , “ this should not be confused with a permissive stance on all gatherings , particularly protests against stay-at-home orders.
” Did the coronavirus develop some kind of superior intelligence enabling it to distinguish between those who were congregating for a “ good cause ” and those who were congregating for a “ bad cause ” ?
Of course not .
What has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coronavirus episode is the politicization of public health at the hands of authoritarians .
Two prestigious medical journals , The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine , were forced to retract studies they had published concluding that Hydroxychloroquine was harmful to Covid patients .
The rush to print the studies looks very much like a political move rather than one based on scientific principles .
Once President Trump revealed that he was taking hydroxychloroquine the mainstream media and even “ expert ” journals began attacking the drug .
This is what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
We get the worst of both .
We get career bureaucrat Dr. Fauci telling us we can never shake hands again and that we must stay home until a vaccine is found .
Meanwhile , doctors across the globe are reporting that this variation of the coronavirus is disappearing on its own .
We have a tradition of separation of church and state in the United States for good reason .
The merger of state and church invites oppression and corruption .
We need to adopt this same approach to medicine and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this merger has produced the same kind of widespread tyranny and corruption .

It seems like only yesterday. Americans were denied the right to go to their churches. They were denied the right to visit their loved ones in the hospital.
by Ron Paul
They were denied the right to open their businesses and go to work to provide for themselves and their families. They were denied the right to go to restaurants, to bars, to hair salons.
No laws were passed denying these rights. Even that would be illegal and immoral. But what happened was worse.
They were denied these basic rights by governors, county judges, and even local mayors who used the coronavirus outbreak as an excuse to rule by decree.
They stole power that was not theirs to take and wielded it at all levels to force America into three months of house arrest.
Then, in the midst of stay-at-home orders across the country, the same governors and local officials who locked Americans in their homes suddenly came around with their keys and threw open the doors. Suddenly not only was it OK to go out into the street, it was required to go out into the street!
What happened? A cure? A miraculous jjab? No. The officials who locked Americans up found a cause they felt required Americans in the streets to protest.
Police had killed a black man, George Floyd, in their custody in Minneapolis and suddenly the need to protest trumped the need to “stay home, save lives.”
Suddenly the same health “experts” who told us we must not gather in crowds or there will be death in the millions from coronavirus issued statements supporting gathering in crowds.
An open letter on the George Floyd protests signed by more than 1,200 doctors and other health professionals clarified that they “do not condemn these gatherings as risky for Covid-19 transmission.”
However, they wrote, “this should not be confused with a permissive stance on all gatherings, particularly protests against stay-at-home orders.”
Did the coronavirus develop some kind of superior intelligence enabling it to distinguish between those who were congregating for a “good cause” and those who were congregating for a “bad cause”? Of course not.
What has happened from the beginning of this shameful coronavirus episode is the politicization of public health at the hands of authoritarians.
Two prestigious medical journals, The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine, were forced to retract studies they had published concluding that Hydroxychloroquine was harmful to Covid patients.
The rush to print the studies looks very much like a political move rather than one based on scientific principles.
Once President Trump revealed that he was taking hydroxychloroquine the mainstream media and even “expert” journals began attacking the drug.
This is what happens when medicine merges with the state. We get the worst of both. We get career bureaucrat Dr. Fauci telling us we can never shake hands again and that we must stay home until a jjab is found.
Meanwhile, doctors across the globe are reporting that this variation of the coronavirus is disappearing on its own.
We have a tradition of separation of church and state in the United States for good reason. The merger of state and church invites oppression and corruption.
We need to adopt this same approach to medicine and the state. We now see how this merger has produced the same kind of widespread tyranny and corruption.