humansarefree--2020-03-12--Coronavirus, AIDS, And The Politics Of Viral Fear

In the 1980 ’ s , agenda-driven panic around the HIV epidemic set back the public health response by years .
Nothing is more viral than fear .
Fear — fight or flight – is a terrible way to make decisions that call for time , science , and rational thinking .
Want to screw up a public health crisis ?
Let fear drive .
Democrats , Pavlovian conditioned by years of believing everything Trump does is “ an existential threat , ” are about twice as likely as Republicans to say the coronavirus poses an imminent danger .
Make @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dempanic — but one ’ s political party should not affect how we respond to an epidemic .
“ Our hyper-polarization is so strong that we don ’ t even assess a potential health crisis in the same way .
And so it impedes our ability to address it , ” said Jennifer McCoy , a Georgia State political science professor who studies polarization .
“ I am not scared of Covid-19 , ” Abdu Sharkawy , an infectious disease expert at the University of Toronto in Canada , wrote .
“ I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and wave of fear that has induced the masses of society into a spellbinding spiral of panic.
” This is not about downplaying something serious .
It is about preventing mistakes that will make things worse .
Trump Derangement Syndrome might actually help kill us this time , as fear makes for poor public health decisions .
In 1981 the CDC reported five cases of a new pneumonia .
The disease didn ’ t even have a name until the next year , and wasn ’ t isolated in the lab until 1984 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over 500,000 Americans .
Yet while a horrible disease and a miserable way to die , in retrospect “ the problem with AIDS was really two epidemics — the real health epidemic and the epidemic of the mind , ” said Boston ’ s WBZ-TV station manager Tom Goodgame , quoted in Time .
Meanwell , The New York Times concluded , “ in the 1980 ’ s , fear spread faster than AIDS.
” America paid the price in lives .
The fear was measurable .
In the mid-80 ’ s 60 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ carry a card noting their status ; one in three said employers should fire employees who had AIDS .
Some 21 percent said people with AIDS should be isolated from the rest of society in leper colonies .
Even a professional medical journal wrote , “ A specter is haunting our streets — the specter of AIDS , a remorseless and incurable disease whose nature , transmission and effects still contain elements of mystery.
” Those mysteries are always the most dangerous elements in shaping public health policy via fear , and with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
When early cases surfaced inside communities already viewed as modern day Sodoms , many sought to exaggerate the crisis from a quasi-religious point of view : God was smiting the gays .
Tragically , too many felt the more who died of AIDS the better , and played up the deaths as “ Judgement.
” The rest of us , God-fearing , were safe .
It ’ s almost like hoping the current economy goes into recession , destroying the savings of millions of Americans , so Trump ’ s chances of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the virus infects those at MAGA rallies .
In the 1980 ’ s , the Reagan administration , with its political debt to newly-empowered evangelical voters , was indifferent at best toward the study or prevention of AIDS .
Congress agreed ; in 1987 it banned the use of federal funds for AIDS prevention and education that “ promoted or encouraged , directly or indirectly , homosexual activities.
” Years were lost as the virus spread , and too many died because of the delay in funding .
We were not innocent .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” was a familiar term in the media and public life , and popular comedians made crude jokes to amuse us .
A study found “ health care trainees and professionals demonstrated their level of empathy and caring for HIV/AIDS is negatively affected by the knowledge that the person being treated is homosexual.
” A 1985 Time magazine story , “ The New Untouchables , ” focused on an incident in New York where parents refused to send their children to a school after one student was identified as HIV+ .
“ What @ @ @ @ @ @ @ What about the water fountain ?
What about kids who get in a fight with a bloody nose ?
They don ’ t know !
” said one frightened parent .
Gay activists also sought to drive public opinion through fear .
The fear of a “ heterosexual breakout ” was employed to coax a Middle American audience toward political awareness .
The community also exaggerated the crisis as spur to more government funding .
In 1988 , after New York revised its estimates of HIV+ citizens significantly downward , members of AIDS @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a sit-in at the Health Department .
Hecklers trailed the Health Commissioner demanding he resign .
His home was picketed and spray-painted .
There were death threats against him .
Yet statistical studies some 30 years later showed even his lower numbers from the 1980s overestimated the extent of the epidemic by some 50 percent .
The Commissioner had been right to tamp down the threat .
Activists justify their use of fear as the only way to have focused attention on the disease .
But that ignores the tragic results of their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ much of the government ’ s early AIDS-prevention budget was used to raise awareness among hetero college students , women , and others who faced relatively low risk .
Money was diverted away from the communities that needed it most .
Even today , AIDS and other fear-mongered diseases soak up a disproportionate share of research funds .
Diseases that account for 84 percent of deaths in the U.S. get less than half of NIH funding .
Cancer and HIV/AIDS in particular receive a disproportionately large amount , while chronic diseases like diabetes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the costs they impose on society .
The worry is always the unknown , and on Day One of an epidemic nearly everything is unknown .
Mistakes get made as protocols are created ( in reality , field tested ) on the fly .
Japan , with an excellent universal health care system and a non-partisan public health bureaucracy , miserably mishandled a cruise ship quarantine , turning the boat into a virus incubator .
Remember when people believed they should not shake hands with a gay man for fear of catching the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ did AIDS subside to where today the disease is a manageable element of public health .
“ AIDS is grim enough without exaggeration , ” cited one New York Times editorial 1987 .
It continued : “ Why has the truth disappeared so far from view ?
Perhaps because the chief interpreters of the data want to reflect their own messages .
Public health experts see a unique chance to reduce all sexually transmitted diseases .
“ Medical researchers demand $ 1 billion in new Federal spending against AIDS , hoping to refurbish @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to protect homosexuals and drug addicts , fear the Reagan Administration may acquire the notion that these are the only people at risk .
“ Moralists see a heaven-sent chance to preach fire , brimstone and restricted sex .
Homosexuals have no desire to carry the stigma of AIDS alone.
” While fear as a political manipulative tool is nothing new , the coronavirus panic appears at a new place in America .
Social media encourages people Joker-like to pour fuel on fires .
MSM pursues an unambiguous political agenda when it is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ profit center .
We are ever more diverse and ever more subreddit separated .
It isn ’ t safe anymore for us to have common fears .
Wash your hands .
Ask questions .
But keep fear in check .
As you encounter information focusing on worst-case scenarios , which seems to exaggerate unknowns , uses terms like surge , crash , skyrocket , Katrina , is more White House gossip than science , anything that starts with Report : ask yourself if the primary purpose is peddling fear — to sell you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ click , to influence your vote .
Socially isolate yourself from that source .
And stop reading political journalists to learn about a health issue .
Politico , currently bleating out Trump isn ’ t doing enough and is bungling what he is doing , was only recently criticizing Trump ’ s prescient travel ban for China travelers as ineffective , and worried it would antagonize Chinese leaders .
I write this from New York , under a declared state of emergency .
Yet for all the screaming headlines one finds the primary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a more expedited purchasing and testing protocol.
” It ’ s more about a better bureaucracy now than something with sirens and flashing lights now .
The numbers will go up until they start going down ( new cases are declining in China and South Korea . )
There is nothing investors fear more than uncertainty , kryptonite to the markets .
Right now that is all there is and volatility in the markets will continue until uncertainty , and then fear , back off .
Before you blame someone or something , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ virus in China , Italy , Iran , and elsewhere where they don ’ t have Trump , and do have universal healthcare , sick leave or whatever other partisan talking point is being pushed .
Panic is easy , a measured response hard .
We need to make good decisions .
Lives depend on it .
Peter Van Buren , a 24-year State Department veteran , is the author of : 1 .
We Meant Well : How I Helped Lose the Battle for the Hearts and Minds of the Iraqi People @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : A Novel of WWII Japan , and 3 .
Ghosts of Tom Joad : A Story of the # 99 Percent .

In the 1980’s, agenda-driven panic around the HIV epidemic set back the public health response by years.
Nothing is more viral than fear. Fear — fight or flight – is a terrible way to make decisions that call for time, science, and rational thinking.
Want to screw up a public health crisis? Let fear drive.
Democrats, Pavlovian conditioned by years of believing everything Trump does is “an existential threat,” are about twice as likely as Republicans to say the coronavirus poses an imminent danger.
Make a joke of it — pandemic or Dempanic — but one’s political party should not affect how we respond to an epidemic.
“Our hyper-polarization is so strong that we don’t even assess a potential health crisis in the same way. And so it impedes our ability to address it,” said Jennifer McCoy, a Georgia State political science professor who studies polarization.
“I am not scared of Covid-19,” Abdu Sharkawy, an infectious disease expert at the University of Toronto in Canada, wrote. “I am scared about the loss of reason and wave of fear that has induced the masses of society into a spellbinding spiral of panic.”
This is not about downplaying something serious. It is about preventing mistakes that will make things worse. Trump Derangement Syndrome might actually help kill us this time, as fear makes for poor public health decisions.
Remember the 1980’s?
In 1981 the CDC reported five cases of a new pneumonia. The disease didn’t even have a name until the next year, and wasn’t isolated in the lab until 1984. AIDS would go on to kill over 500,000 Americans.
Yet while a horrible disease and a miserable way to die, in retrospect “the problem with AIDS was really two epidemics — the real health epidemic and the epidemic of the mind,” said Boston’s WBZ-TV station manager Tom Goodgame, quoted in Time.
Meanwell, The New York Times concluded, “in the 1980’s, fear spread faster than AIDS.” America paid the price in lives.
The fear was measurable. In the mid-80’s 60 percent of Americans wanted HIV+ people to carry a card noting their status; one in three said employers should fire employees who had AIDS.
Some 21 percent said people with AIDS should be isolated from the rest of society in leper colonies.
Even a professional medical journal wrote, “A specter is haunting our streets — the specter of AIDS, a remorseless and incurable disease whose nature, transmission and effects still contain elements of mystery.”
Those mysteries are always the most dangerous elements in shaping public health policy via fear, and with AIDS, centered on exaggerating the problem.
When early cases surfaced inside communities already viewed as modern day Sodoms, many sought to exaggerate the crisis from a quasi-religious point of view: God was smiting the gays.
Tragically, too many felt the more who died of AIDS the better, and played up the deaths as “Judgement.” The rest of us, God-fearing, were safe.
Homophobia manifested as fear crushed human compassion.
It’s almost like hoping the current economy goes into recession, destroying the savings of millions of Americans, so Trump’s chances of reelection fall. Or one politician hoping the virus infects those at MAGA rallies.
In the 1980’s, the Reagan administration, with its political debt to newly-empowered evangelical voters, was indifferent at best toward the study or prevention of AIDS.
Congress agreed; in 1987 it banned the use of federal funds for AIDS prevention and education that “promoted or encouraged, directly or indirectly, homosexual activities.”
Years were lost as the virus spread, and too many died because of the delay in funding.
We were not innocent. In the mid-to-late 1980s “AIDS hysteria” was a familiar term in the media and public life, and popular comedians made crude jokes to amuse us.
A study found “health care trainees and professionals demonstrated their level of empathy and caring for HIV/AIDS is negatively affected by the knowledge that the person being treated is homosexual.”
A 1985 Time magazine story, “The New Untouchables,” focused on an incident in New York where parents refused to send their children to a school after one student was identified as HIV+.
“What about somebody sneezing in the classroom? What about the water fountain? What about kids who get in a fight with a bloody nose? They don’t know!” said one frightened parent.
Gay activists also sought to drive public opinion through fear. The fear of a “heterosexual breakout” was employed to coax a Middle American audience toward political awareness.
The community also exaggerated the crisis as spur to more government funding.
In 1988, after New York revised its estimates of HIV+ citizens significantly downward, members of AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power were arrested at a sit-in at the Health Department.
Hecklers trailed the Health Commissioner demanding he resign. His home was picketed and spray-painted. There were death threats against him.
Yet statistical studies some 30 years later showed even his lower numbers from the 1980s overestimated the extent of the epidemic by some 50 percent. The Commissioner had been right to tamp down the threat.
Activists justify their use of fear as the only way to have focused attention on the disease. But that ignores the tragic results of their actions.
While funding did increase, much of the government’s early AIDS-prevention budget was used to raise awareness among hetero college students, women, and others who faced relatively low risk. Money was diverted away from the communities that needed it most.
Even today, AIDS and other fear-mongered diseases soak up a disproportionate share of research funds. Diseases that account for 84 percent of deaths in the U.S. get less than half of NIH funding.
Cancer and HIV/AIDS in particular receive a disproportionately large amount, while chronic diseases like diabetes and obesity receive less funding relative to the costs they impose on society.
The worry is always the unknown, and on Day One of an epidemic nearly everything is unknown. Mistakes get made as protocols are created (in reality, field tested) on the fly.
Japan, with an excellent universal health care system and a non-partisan public health bureaucracy, miserably mishandled a cruise ship quarantine, turning the boat into a virus incubator.
Remember when people believed they should not shake hands with a gay man for fear of catching the disease? Only when science replaced fear did AIDS subside to where today the disease is a manageable element of public health.
“AIDS is grim enough without exaggeration,” cited one New York Times editorial 1987. It continued:
“Why has the truth disappeared so far from view? Perhaps because the chief interpreters of the data want to reflect their own messages. Public health experts see a unique chance to reduce all sexually transmitted diseases.
“Medical researchers demand $1 billion in new Federal spending against AIDS, hoping to refurbish their laboratories. Government epidemiologists, seeking to protect homosexuals and drug addicts, fear the Reagan Administration may acquire the notion that these are the only people at risk.
“Moralists see a heaven-sent chance to preach fire, brimstone and restricted sex. Homosexuals have no desire to carry the stigma of AIDS alone.”
While fear as a political manipulative tool is nothing new, the coronavirus panic appears at a new place in America. Social media encourages people Joker-like to pour fuel on fires.
MSM pursues an unambiguous political agenda when it is not just peddling raw anxiety as a profit center. We are ever more diverse and ever more subreddit separated. It isn’t safe anymore for us to have common fears.
Wash your hands. Ask questions. But keep fear in check.
As you encounter information focusing on worst-case scenarios, which seems to exaggerate unknowns, uses terms like surge, crash, skyrocket, Katrina, is more White House gossip than science, anything that starts with Report: ask yourself if the primary purpose is peddling fear — to sell you a product, to get you to click, to influence your vote.
Socially isolate yourself from that source.
And stop reading political journalists to learn about a health issue.
Politico, currently bleating out Trump isn’t doing enough and is bungling what he is doing, was only recently criticizing Trump’s prescient travel ban for China travelers as ineffective, and worried it would antagonize Chinese leaders.
I write this from New York, under a declared state of emergency.
Yet for all the screaming headlines one finds the primary motivation for the declaration was simply “a more expedited purchasing and testing protocol.”
It’s more about a better bureaucracy now than something with sirens and flashing lights now.
The numbers will go up until they start going down (new cases are declining in China and South Korea.)
There is nothing investors fear more than uncertainty, kryptonite to the markets. Right now that is all there is and volatility in the markets will continue until uncertainty, and then fear, back off.
Before you blame someone or something, figure out how to blame away the virus in China, Italy, Iran, and elsewhere where they don’t have Trump, and do have universal healthcare, sick leave or whatever other partisan talking point is being pushed.
Panic is easy, a measured response hard. We need to make good decisions. Lives depend on it.
By Peter Van Buren, TheAmericanConservative.com
Peter Van Buren, a 24-year State Department veteran, is the author of:
1. We Meant Well: How I Helped Lose the Battle for the Hearts and Minds of the Iraqi People,
2. Hooper’s War: A Novel of WWII Japan, and
3. Ghosts of Tom Joad: A Story of the #99 Percent.


humansarefree--2020-03-15--China’s Foreign Ministry Spokesman Claims “US Army” May Have Started Coronavirus Outbreak in Wuhan

China ’ s Foreign Ministry spokesman has sensationally blamed the U.S. Army for starting the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan .
The day after President Donald Trump shut down travel from European countries for 30 days , Zhao Lijian made the outlandish assertion that the U.S. itself was responsible for starting the pandemic .
“ It might be US army who brought the epidemic to Wuhan , ” tweeted Lijian , adding “ Be transparent !
Make public your data !
US owe us an explanation !
” His tweet included the testimony of CDC Director Robert Redfield to the House @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that early COVID-19 cases in the United States were initially mistaken for regular influenza .
“ CDC was caught on the spot .
When did patient zero begin in US ?
How many people are infected ?
What are the names of the hospitals ?
” asked Lijian .
“ So it appears the official Chinese party line is now that the virus originated in the United States !
” comments Zero Hedge .
Apparently , Lijian has a history of making outrageous claims but this one probably tops them all .
Whether @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his sentiments remains to be seen .

China’s Foreign Ministry spokesman has sensationally blamed the U.S. Army for starting the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan.
The day after President Donald Trump shut down travel from European countries for 30 days, Zhao Lijian made the outlandish assertion that the U.S. itself was responsible for starting the pandemic.
“It might be US army who brought the epidemic to Wuhan,” tweeted Lijian, adding “Be transparent! Make public your data! US owe us an explanation!”
His tweet included the testimony of CDC Director Robert Redfield to the House Oversight Committee, in which Redfield revealed that early COVID-19 cases in the United States were initially mistaken for regular influenza.
2/2 CDC was caught on the spot. When did patient zero begin in US? How many people are infected? What are the names of the hospitals? It might be US army who brought the epidemic to Wuhan. Be transparent! Make public your data! US owe us an explanation! pic.twitter.com/vYNZRFPWo3 — Lijian Zhao 赵立坚 (@zlj517) March 12, 2020
“CDC was caught on the spot. When did patient zero begin in US? How many people are infected? What are the names of the hospitals?” asked Lijian.
1/2 CDC Director Robert Redfield admitted some Americans who seemingly died from influenza were tested positive for novel #coronavirus in the posthumous diagnosis, during the House Oversight Committee Wednesday. #COVID19 pic.twitter.com/vYNZRFPWo3 — Lijian Zhao 赵立坚 (@zlj517) March 12, 2020
“So it appears the official Chinese party line is now that the virus originated in the United States!” comments Zero Hedge.
Apparently, Lijian has a history of making outrageous claims but this one probably tops them all.
Whether or not the ruling Communist Party echoes his sentiments remains to be seen.
Source: Summit.news


humansarefree--2020-03-15--Kentucky is Named “One of the Most Corrupt States in the Country”

As part of the “ End Corruption Now Campaign , ” the FBI began an investigation into public corruption in Kentucky , just after a recent Harvard study identified Kentucky as “ one of the most corrupt states in the country.
” The FBI website noted that between 2003 and 2012 , approximately 300 individuals were convicted of federal crimes related to public corruption .
Special Agent in Charge ( SAC ) Howard S. Marshall of the FBI ’ s Louisville Division , explained , “ The End Corruption Now campaign seeks to unite the commonwealth in the fight against @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proverbial dog catcher , to the police officer , to the highest state and federal officials in the commonwealth.
” Tell the FBI that Kentucky ’ s Children are “ Not For Sale ” MedicalKidnap.com has exposed many stories revealing the corruption within Kentucky ’ s Department for Community Based Services ( DCBS ) and the unwarranted removal of children from loving homes .
Often these stories reveal blatant violations of Kentucky citizens ’ Constitutional Rights by social workers and law enforcement when conducting home visits , searching homes , and removing children @ @ @ @ @ @ @ circumstances .
According to the Kentucky DCBS website : “ DCBS is the primary adoption agency in Kentucky.
” MedicalKidnap.com has shared how these “ adoption businesses ” are wrought with fraud , motivated by federal funding , essentially selling our nation ’ s children and destroying families .
Many Kentucky families have shared their stories , revealing the unlawful overreach of these government agents into their lives , and the unjust kidnapping of their children for financial gain .
One concerned mother , who is no stranger to the corruption within Kentucky @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to urge all Kentucky families to share their personal concerns about the corruption in DCBS .
She said that she had hoped for this day for many years , since she has been calling and emailing the FBI for many years regarding the fraudulent practices of DCBS in Kentucky .
She says that while she doesn ’ t know if her persistent communications had anything to do with this current FBI investigation , she is just happy to see it underway , and for the public to have an opportunity for their voices @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of suffering at the hands of DCBS , she is feeling hopeful that Kentucky families may finally receive some long-awaited justice .
The FBI realizes that public trust in local government has been undermined .
Concerned citizens are the FBI ’ s biggest asset when it comes to exposing corrupt public officials .
The public is being urged to help in identifying public corruption within their community .
Now is the time for Kentucky citizens to speak up !
“ Public corruption victimizes everyone — taxpayers , voters , communities .
Public officials @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more than mere employees .
They are servants of the public interest , and we must insist on absolute honesty , integrity and trustworthiness from every one .
“ The U.S. Attorney ’ s Office for the Western District of Kentucky will continue working with our law enforcement partners to ensure crimes involving public corruption are prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
” ( Source ) “ Public corruption is a terribly destructive force throughout Kentucky and has been a particularly pernicious problem in certain areas of the Eastern District of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of public officials serve honorably , those who corrupt the operations of government rob their communities-their friends and neighbors-of the fundamental right to honest government .
We are pleased to continue our longstanding partnership with the FBI as we work together to combat this statewide problem.
” ( Source ) It ’ s time to hold our public servants accountable ; from the social workers to the local Sheriffs , from the Family Court Judges to the Guardian Ad Litems .
How You Can Help Let the FBI hear your voice concerning corruption @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hotline toll-free : ( 844 ) 596-6721 Contact the FBI Louisville Division here .

As part of the “End Corruption Now Campaign,” the FBI began an investigation into public corruption in Kentucky, just after a recent Harvard study identified Kentucky as “one of the most corrupt states in the country.”
The FBI website noted that between 2003 and 2012, approximately 300 individuals were convicted of federal crimes related to public corruption.
Special Agent in Charge (SAC) Howard S. Marshall of the FBI’s Louisville Division, explained,
“The End Corruption Now campaign seeks to unite the commonwealth in the fight against corruption at every level, from the proverbial dog catcher, to the police officer, to the highest state and federal officials in the commonwealth.”
Tell the FBI that Kentucky’s Children are “Not For Sale”
MedicalKidnap.com has exposed many stories revealing the corruption within Kentucky’s Department for Community Based Services (DCBS) and the unwarranted removal of children from loving homes.
Often these stories reveal blatant violations of Kentucky citizens’ Constitutional Rights by social workers and law enforcement when conducting home visits, searching homes, and removing children, often without a warrant or exigent circumstances.
According to the Kentucky DCBS website: “DCBS is the primary adoption agency in Kentucky.”
MedicalKidnap.com has shared how these “adoption businesses” are wrought with fraud, motivated by federal funding, essentially selling our nation’s children and destroying families.
Many Kentucky families have shared their stories, revealing the unlawful overreach of these government agents into their lives, and the unjust kidnapping of their children for financial gain.
Public Urged to Speak Up!
One concerned mother, who is no stranger to the corruption within Kentucky DCBS, contacted Medical Kidnap asking us to urge all Kentucky families to share their personal concerns about the corruption in DCBS.
She said that she had hoped for this day for many years, since she has been calling and emailing the FBI for many years regarding the fraudulent practices of DCBS in Kentucky.
She says that while she doesn’t know if her persistent communications had anything to do with this current FBI investigation, she is just happy to see it underway, and for the public to have an opportunity for their voices to be heard.
After many years of suffering at the hands of DCBS, she is feeling hopeful that Kentucky families may finally receive some long-awaited justice.
The FBI realizes that public trust in local government has been undermined. Concerned citizens are the FBI’s biggest asset when it comes to exposing corrupt public officials. The public is being urged to help in identifying public corruption within their community.
Now is the time for Kentucky citizens to speak up!
U.S. Attorney John Kuhn noted,
“Public corruption victimizes everyone — taxpayers, voters, communities. Public officials, whether elected or appointed, are more than mere employees. They are servants of the public interest, and we must insist on absolute honesty, integrity and trustworthiness from every one.
“The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Kentucky will continue working with our law enforcement partners to ensure crimes involving public corruption are prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.” (Source)
U.S. Attorney Kerry Harvey agreed, stating,
“Public corruption is a terribly destructive force throughout Kentucky and has been a particularly pernicious problem in certain areas of the Eastern District of Kentucky.
“While the overwhelming majority of public officials serve honorably, those who corrupt the operations of government rob their communities-their friends and neighbors-of the fundamental right to honest government. We are pleased to continue our longstanding partnership with the FBI as we work together to combat this statewide problem.” (Source)
It’s time to hold our public servants accountable; from the social workers to the local Sheriffs, from the Family Court Judges to the Guardian Ad Litems.
How You Can Help
Let the FBI hear your voice concerning corruption in Kentucky DCBS:
Call the FBI hotline toll-free: (844) 596-6721
Contact the FBI Louisville Division here.
Source: MedicalKidnap.com


humansarefree--2020-03-15--Huge Stone Spheres Discovered on Arctic Deserted Island

These large stone spheres in the Franz Josef archipelago leave scientists flummoxed .
Visitors to this cosmic landscape named the round rocks ‘ footballs of the Gods ’ .
The huge stone balls up to two metres in height are found on appropriately-named Champ island above the polar circle .
Perfectly spherical they are scattered all over this northern uninhabited outpost .
The barren 374 km2 ( 144 sq miles ) island was never inhabited and scientists can not agree how they were formed .
Similar but smaller stone balls were found last year on Heiss island in the same @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spherulites look like round bullets or cannon balls .
We found balls of different sizes , but none as big as at Champ island.
’ As previous reports have noted every geologist seems to have their own theory .
Austrian geologist Sepp Fridhubera claimed the rounded shapes of the rocks were formed underwater and they have an organic core in the centre .
Similar round stones were discovered in Volgograd , Costa Rica ( more pictures here ) , New Zealand , China , Bosnia , and South Africa .
Another unexplained nature @ @ @ @ @ @ @ world .

These large stone spheres in the Franz Josef archipelago leave scientists flummoxed.
Visitors to this cosmic landscape named the round rocks ‘footballs of the Gods’. The huge stone balls up to two metres in height are found on appropriately-named Champ island above the polar circle.
Perfectly spherical they are scattered all over this northern uninhabited outpost.
The barren 374 km2 (144 sq miles) island was never inhabited and scientists cannot agree how they were formed.
Similar but smaller stone balls were found last year on Heiss island in the same archipelago.
On Heiss island ‘the spherulites look like round bullets or cannon balls. We found balls of different sizes, but none as big as at Champ island.’
As previous reports have noted every geologist seems to have their own theory.
Austrian geologist Sepp Fridhubera claimed the rounded shapes of the rocks were formed underwater and they have an organic core in the centre.
Similar round stones were discovered in Volgograd, Costa Rica (more pictures here), New Zealand, China, Bosnia, and South Africa. Another unexplained nature phenomenon in a remote area around the world.
Sources: SiberianTimes.com; StrangeSounds.org


humansarefree--2020-03-15--Think Tank Complains “Coronavirus Is Killing Globalization as We Know It”

The founder of a globalist think tank has written an article for Foreign Policy in which he complains that the coronavirus outbreak is “ killing globalization as we know it.
” Philippe Legrain , founder of the Open Political Economy Network ( OPEN ) says that the spread of COVID-19 “ has been a gift to nativist nationalists and protectionists.
” Legrain argues that coronavirus could be “ the nail in the coffin for the current era of globalization ” because it has “ highlighted the downsides of extensive international integration while fanning fears of foreigners and providing legitimacy for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of people.
” He adds that the crisis will have a lasting impact on undermining America ’ s reliance on international supply chains and provide “ political fodder for nationalists who favor greater protectionism and immigration controls.
” “ The coronavirus crisis threatens to usher in a less globalized world , ” concludes Legrain .
“ Once the pandemic and panic abate , those who believe that openness to people and products from around the world is generally a good thing will need to make the case for it in fresh and persuasive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The Washington Post Company ( now Graham Holdings Company ) and has a distinctly globalist bias .
Legrain ’ s point that coronavirus has provided legitimacy for restrictions of flows of people is borne out by the fact that countries like Russia and Singapore , which imposed strong border controls to stop COVID-19 back in January , have largely escaped the worst of pandemic .
In his latest column , conservative icon Pat Buchanan also highlights how coronavirus has served to expose the weaknesses of globalization .
“ It may one day be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the New World Order , to a half-century of globalization and to the era of interdependence of the world ’ s great nations , ” writes Buchanan .

The founder of a globalist think tank has written an article for Foreign Policy in which he complains that the coronavirus outbreak is “killing globalization as we know it.”
Philippe Legrain, founder of the Open Political Economy Network (OPEN) says that the spread of COVID-19 “has been a gift to nativist nationalists and protectionists.”
Legrain argues that coronavirus could be “the nail in the coffin for the current era of globalization” because it has “highlighted the downsides of extensive international integration while fanning fears of foreigners and providing legitimacy for national restrictions on global trade and flows of people.”
He adds that the crisis will have a lasting impact on undermining America’s reliance on international supply chains and provide “political fodder for nationalists who favor greater protectionism and immigration controls.”
“The coronavirus crisis threatens to usher in a less globalized world,” concludes Legrain.
“Once the pandemic and panic abate, those who believe that openness to people and products from around the world is generally a good thing will need to make the case for it in fresh and persuasive ways.”
Foreign Policy is published by The Washington Post Company (now Graham Holdings Company) and has a distinctly globalist bias.
Legrain’s point that coronavirus has provided legitimacy for restrictions of flows of people is borne out by the fact that countries like Russia and Singapore, which imposed strong border controls to stop COVID-19 back in January, have largely escaped the worst of pandemic.
In his latest column, conservative icon Pat Buchanan also highlights how coronavirus has served to expose the weaknesses of globalization.
“It may one day be said that the coronavirus delivered the deathblow to the New World Order, to a half-century of globalization and to the era of interdependence of the world’s great nations,” writes Buchanan.
Sources: Summit.news; YouTube.com


humansarefree--2020-03-15--Iran’s Coronavirus Crisis: Mass Graves So Large They Can Be Seen From Space

Iran is building so many burial pits that satellite photos were able to detect them .
These new satellite images show that the coronavirus outbreak in Iran may either be worse than what government sources are reporting , or they may be preparing for a possible disaster .
In the city of Qom , just 80 miles south of Tehran , there ’ s a massive cemetery known as the Behesht-e Masoumeh Complex , which lies around six miles north of the city center .
Satellite images from as early as February 21 show that excavation teams have been hard @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the graveyard .
By the end of February , two large trenches , around 100 yards in length total , had been dug out — they were so large that they were visible from space .
According to video testimony , official statements as well as analysis from experts , this excavation project wasn ’ t just a routine expansion of a cemetery , but these fresh graves were dug out to accommodate the country ’ s near-uncontrollable death toll from the coronavirus pandemic .
The pictures of the new graves were taken @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a private space technology company based in Colorado .
A senior imagery analyst from Maxar told Vox that “ the trenches were made very quickly ” and that these new graves mark a clear departure from the country ’ s past burial practices when it comes to individual and family grave plots .
Furthermore , the same Maxar analyst said that they have an image of a large pile of lime right next to the freshly-dug plots .
Iranian health officials have previously said that they ’ re using lime to bury those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by BBC Persia purportedly shows the mass graves in Bahesht-e Masoumeh .
In the video , the narrator describes the scenes he ’ s seeing in the cemetery .
“ This is the section for the coronavirus victims , ” says the narrator , as the camera pans to a small portion of the trench , showing small , simple markers placed on mounds of dirt and people in blue protective suits standing nearby .
“ More than 80 [ people ] have been buried in this section so far , and they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is citing Iran ’ s official death toll on February 28 .
Fabian Hinz , a research associate and geospatial analysis expert for Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey , reviewed the video as well as another video that was also supposedly shot on sight , said that “ unique geographical markers ” in the videos match landmarks found in the massive graveyard .
This provides evidence to support the hypothesis that the trenches at Bahesht-e Masoumeh were made to supply Qom with more burials for coronavirus victims .
As of press @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of coronavirus and 429 deaths .
They also reported 75 new deaths over the past 24 hours — the most deaths reported by Iran in a single day .
Reports came in last week that dozens of dead Iranians were being kept in black body bags , unburied , on the floor of a morgue in Qom , meaning that morgues all over the city may be struggling to find space for all of the dead .
This underscores how one of the holiest cities in Shia Islam is struggling to contend with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ span of time .
Two medical workers in Qom even told reporters that they worry the coronavirus may put an end to traditional Islamic burial practices , which involves washing the body with soap and water before laying it to rest , due to the fears over catching the infection from dead bodies .
Instead , the bodies are being treated with lime so that the coronavirus doesn ’ t infect the soil .
Ali Ramezani , director of Bahesht-e Masoumeh , told a state-run news agency that there was a “ pile-up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fear and confusion as Iranian government officials keel over due to their COVID-19 infections Iran is currently being criticized for its lack of transparency with regards to the progression of the outbreak in their country .
Many experts believe that the real infection rate and death toll are much higher than what the Iranian government reporting .
For example , Mohammad Hossein Ghorbani , a representative for the health ministry of Gilan province , commented that the death toll in the province alone was over 200 — which would represent nearly half of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Over the weekend , the National Council of Resistance of Iran ( NCRI ) , a Paris-based political organization made up primarily of Iranian expatriates dedicated to the toppling of the country ’ s current regime , held an online conference that featured addresses by Iranian nurses , medical practitioners and health experts from 19 different locations .
Their main topic : the beginning and the spread of the coronavirus outbreak in their home country .
Some who spoke at the conference put the real death toll at over 2,000 .
A @ @ @ @ @ @ @ officials in Iran have either been infected by the coronavirus or have succumbed to it .
Here are the 14 known current and former politicians who have COVID-19 : • Mohammad Sadr , member of the Expediency Council , which acts as an advisory council for the Supreme Leader , Ali Khamenei • Mostafa Pourmohammadi , former minister of justice and adviser to the current justice minister • Farideddin Haddad-Adel , close ally of the Supreme Leader , his sister is Khamenei ’ s daughter-in-law • Mojtaba Zolnour , member of parliament ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for National Security and Foreign Affairs Furthermore , the speaker for Iran ’ s parliament reported that 23 MPs have tested positive for COVID-19 , including the four MPs listed above .
The country ’ s has also experienced an unprecedented amount of clerics and government officials dying from the virus .
Here are 14 confirmed deaths due to COVID-19 : • Hossein Sheikholeslam , former ambassador to Syria and former adviser to the current minister for foreign affairs • Ahmad Toyserkani , adviser to the current head of the judiciary • Reza @ @ @ @ @ @ @ agriculture in Gilan province • Farzad Tazari , former commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps ( IRGC ) and former deputy of the IRGC ’ s political bureau • Ayatollah Mohsen Habibi , high-ranking cleric and member of the Supreme Council of Tehran ’ s Seminaries • Ali Hosseini , cleric and head of the Islamic Development Organization “ We Iranians are about to lose many of our friends and families to this epidemic , ” said Sina Dashti , a member of NCRI and an infectologist residing in Sweden .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ One is COVID-19 and the second is the Iranian regime .
Transparency is key to fighting epidemics .
The regime is preventing news of the epidemic from being broadcast .
”

Iran is building so many burial pits that satellite photos were able to detect them. These new satellite images show that the coronavirus outbreak in Iran may either be worse than what government sources are reporting, or they may be preparing for a possible disaster.
In the city of Qom, just 80 miles south of Tehran, there’s a massive cemetery known as the Behesht-e Masoumeh Complex, which lies around six miles north of the city center.
Satellite images from as early as February 21 show that excavation teams have been hard at work creating a new section in the graveyard. By the end of February, two large trenches, around 100 yards in length total, had been dug out — they were so large that they were visible from space.
According to video testimony, official statements as well as analysis from experts, this excavation project wasn’t just a routine expansion of a cemetery, but these fresh graves were dug out to accommodate the country’s near-uncontrollable death toll from the coronavirus pandemic.
The pictures of the new graves were taken on March 1 by Maxar Technologies, a private space technology company based in Colorado.
A senior imagery analyst from Maxar told Vox that “the trenches were made very quickly” and that these new graves mark a clear departure from the country’s past burial practices when it comes to individual and family grave plots.

Furthermore, the same Maxar analyst said that they have an image of a large pile of lime right next to the freshly-dug plots. Iranian health officials have previously said that they’re using lime to bury those killed by COVID-19.
A video released by BBC Persia purportedly shows the mass graves in Bahesht-e Masoumeh. In the video, the narrator describes the scenes he’s seeing in the cemetery.
“This is the section for the coronavirus victims,” says the narrator, as the camera pans to a small portion of the trench, showing small, simple markers placed on mounds of dirt and people in blue protective suits standing nearby.
“More than 80 [people] have been buried in this section so far, and they say only 34 deaths.” The man is citing Iran’s official death toll on February 28.
Fabian Hinz, a research associate and geospatial analysis expert for Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey, reviewed the video as well as another video that was also supposedly shot on sight, said that “unique geographical markers” in the videos match landmarks found in the massive graveyard.
This provides evidence to support the hypothesis that the trenches at Bahesht-e Masoumeh were made to supply Qom with more burials for coronavirus victims.
Mistrust and mishandling hamper Iran’s efforts to combat outbreak
As of press time, Iran reports having 10,075 cases of coronavirus and 429 deaths. They also reported 75 new deaths over the past 24 hours — the most deaths reported by Iran in a single day.
Listen to the helpless pleas of this healthcare worker from Iran: "Please take #CoronaVirus seriously. Don't come out of your homes. We healthcare workers are exhausted. We cannot cope with it any longer". Due to the negligence of authorities, the virus has spread all over Iran pic.twitter.com/Q4udfdj0b4 — Masih Alinejad 🏳 (@AlinejadMasih) March 12, 2020
Reports came in last week that dozens of dead Iranians were being kept in black body bags, unburied, on the floor of a morgue in Qom, meaning that morgues all over the city may be struggling to find space for all of the dead.
This underscores how one of the holiest cities in Shia Islam is struggling to contend with so many deaths in such a short span of time.
Two medical workers in Qom even told reporters that they worry the coronavirus may put an end to traditional Islamic burial practices, which involves washing the body with soap and water before laying it to rest, due to the fears over catching the infection from dead bodies.
Instead, the bodies are being treated with lime so that the coronavirus doesn’t infect the soil. Ali Ramezani, director of Bahesht-e Masoumeh, told a state-run news agency that there was a “pile-up” of bodies at the cemetery.
Fear and confusion as Iranian government officials keel over due to their COVID-19 infections
Iran is currently being criticized for its lack of transparency with regards to the progression of the outbreak in their country. Many experts believe that the real infection rate and death toll are much higher than what the Iranian government reporting.
For example, Mohammad Hossein Ghorbani, a representative for the health ministry of Gilan province, commented that the death toll in the province alone was over 200 — which would represent nearly half of the entire country’s reported deaths.
Over the weekend, the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), a Paris-based political organization made up primarily of Iranian expatriates dedicated to the toppling of the country’s current regime, held an online conference that featured addresses by Iranian nurses, medical practitioners and health experts from 19 different locations.
Their main topic: the beginning and the spread of the coronavirus outbreak in their home country. Some who spoke at the conference put the real death toll at over 2,000.
While the Iranian regime claims the #Coronavirus death toll for the entire country is 194, the Health Minister's Plenipotentiary Representative in Gilan Province says the death toll in Gilan province alone is 200. https://t.co/uPYclIr8NW — NCRI-FAC (@iran_policy) March 8, 2020
A surprising number of current and former government officials in Iran have either been infected by the coronavirus or have succumbed to it. Here are the 14 known current and former politicians who have COVID-19:
Eshaq Jahangiri, First Vice President
Masoumeh Ebtekar, Vice President for Women and Family Affairs
Reza Rahmani, minister of Industry, Mines and Business
Ali Asghar Mounesan, acting minister of Cultural Heritage and Tourism
Iraj Harirchi, deputy minister of Health
Esmail Najar, head of emergency response organization, the National Disaster Management Organization
Pirhossein Koolivand, head of emergency medical services
Mohammad Sadr, member of the Expediency Council, which acts as an advisory council for the Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei
Mostafa Pourmohammadi, former minister of justice and adviser to the current justice minister
Farideddin Haddad-Adel, close ally of the Supreme Leader, his sister is Khamenei’s daughter-in-law
Mojtaba Zolnour, member of parliament (MP) and chair of the Committee for National Security and Foreign Affairs
Masoumeh Aghapour Alishahi, MP
Zohreh Elahian, MP
Mahmoud Sadeghi, MP
Furthermore, the speaker for Iran’s parliament reported that 23 MPs have tested positive for COVID-19, including the four MPs listed above. The country’s has also experienced an unprecedented amount of clerics and government officials dying from the virus. Here are 14 confirmed deaths due to COVID-19:
Mohammad Mirmohammadi, member of the Expediency Council
Fatemeh Rahbar, newly-elected MP
Hadi Khosroshahi, former ambassador to Vatican City
Hossein Sheikholeslam, former ambassador to Syria and former adviser to the current minister for foreign affairs
Ahmad Toyserkani, adviser to the current head of the judiciary
Reza Pourkhanali, official in the ministry of agriculture in Gilan province
Mohammadreza Rahchamani, former MP
Mousa Torabzadeh, former prosecutor
Farzad Tazari, former commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and former deputy of the IRGC’s political bureau
Ayatollah Reza Mohammadi Langroudi, a high-ranking cleric
Ayatollah Mohsen Habibi, high-ranking cleric and member of the Supreme Council of Tehran’s Seminaries
Ali Hosseini, cleric and head of the Islamic Development Organization
Akbar Dehghan, cleric and head of Qom seminary’s interpretation staff
Reza Modaressi, cleric from Qom
“We Iranians are about to lose many of our friends and families to this epidemic,” said Sina Dashti, a member of NCRI and an infectologist residing in Sweden.
“Iranians are fighting with two enemies. One is COVID-19 and the second is the Iranian regime. Transparency is key to fighting epidemics. The regime is preventing news of the epidemic from being broadcast.”
Reference: NaturalNews.com


humansarefree--2020-03-16--Dutch Researchers Find Coronavirus Antibody

A world premiere for Erasmus MC and Utrecht University .
Researchers from the two universities have discovered an antibody against COVID-19 .
The scientific paper from the group of ten scientists is now ready for peer reviews from the leading professional journal Nature .
The Rotterdam university journal – Erasmus Magazine – first reported the sensational news .
According to one of the people who identified it , the antibody that blocks the infection of SARS1 and SARS2 was already briefly lain in the fridge at the Erasmus MC in Rotterdam .
Professor of Cell Biology Frank Grosveld ( 71 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ten scientists .
He posted the article about the discovery to BioRxiv last Thursday .
BioRxiv is a website where biologists can publish their research before it has been peer-reviewed by a professional journal .
The summary talks about an antibody against SARS2 , the coronavirus that is causing the current pandemic ( COVID-19 ) .
The antibody may help detect and prevent this form of Corona infection .
This would , therefore , make the active antibody a world premiere .
The antibody still has to be tested on human beings and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Yet Grosveld is hopeful , according to Erasmus Magazine : “ We are now trying to get a pharmaceutical company on board – that ’ s looking good , by the way – which can mass-produce the antibody as a medicine on a large scale .
This is the very first antibody that we know of that will block the infection .
“ And there is a good chance that this will also become a medicine that reaches the market .
If this is taken by a patient , then it is expected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that patient .
So , the patient will have a chance of recovery.
” In the article , Grosveld has responded critically to the Dutch approach to the Corona pandemic .
“ We have been too lax and were ill-prepared .
For example , there were too few tests and too few restrictions from the outset , even though we saw what happened in China and then Italy .
”

A world premiere for Erasmus MC and Utrecht University. Researchers from the two universities have discovered an antibody against COVID-19.
The scientific paper from the group of ten scientists is now ready for peer reviews from the leading professional journal Nature. The Rotterdam university journal – Erasmus Magazine – first reported the sensational news.
According to one of the people who identified it, the antibody that blocks the infection of SARS1 and SARS2 was already briefly lain in the fridge at the Erasmus MC in Rotterdam. Professor of Cell Biology Frank Grosveld (71) is part of a team of ten scientists.
He posted the article about the discovery to BioRxiv last Thursday. BioRxiv is a website where biologists can publish their research before it has been peer-reviewed by a professional journal.
The summary talks about an antibody against SARS2, the coronavirus that is causing the current pandemic (COVID-19).
The antibody may help detect and prevent this form of Corona infection. This would, therefore, make the active antibody a world premiere.
Very first antibody
The antibody still has to be tested on human beings and this will take a few months. Yet Grosveld is hopeful, according to Erasmus Magazine:
“We are now trying to get a pharmaceutical company on board – that’s looking good, by the way – which can mass-produce the antibody as a medicine on a large scale. This is the very first antibody that we know of that will block the infection.
“And there is a good chance that this will also become a medicine that reaches the market. If this is taken by a patient, then it is expected that the infection can be stopped in that patient. So, the patient will have a chance of recovery.”
In the article, Grosveld has responded critically to the Dutch approach to the Corona pandemic.
“We have been too lax and were ill-prepared. For example, there were too few tests and too few restrictions from the outset, even though we saw what happened in China and then Italy.”
Source: InnovationOrigins.com


humansarefree--2020-03-16--Massive Genetic Study Challenges Darwin’s Theory of Evolution

If you have been following genetic and epigenetic studies conducted within the edifices of modern science over the past couple of decades , you likely have suspected what I am about to tell you : Mr. Darwin has already left the building , his disheveled ‘ Theory of Evolution ’ in tow .
A massive new genetic study by Mark Stoeckle from The Rockefeller University in New York and David Thaler at the University of Basel in Switzerland puts a few more nails into an already-rotting coffin , opening the door for new theories about our origins and the mechanisms @ @ @ @ @ @ @ planet .
In the conventional narrative of how evolution proceeds through survival-of-the-fittest and adaptation to new environments based on random genetic mutations , it is natural to expect that species with large , far-flung populations like ants and humans will become more genetically diverse over time than species who remain in one milieu .
But is it true ?
“ The answer is no , ” said Stoeckle , lead author of the study , published in the journal Human Evolution .
In fact , the genetic diversity of most species on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , no matter their history of migration , relocation or proliferation .
The study ’ s most startling result , perhaps , is that nine out of 10 species on Earth today , including humans , came into being 100,000 to 200,000 years ago .
“ This conclusion is very surprising , and I fought against it as hard as I could , ” said David Thaler .
Indeed it is surprising – since it presents a stunning invalidation of the commonplace notion that evolution on the planet has been slow , linear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ challenges to this notion in the form of ‘ missing links ’ could be perceived as grounded in a lack of physical evidence which one day would be resolved .
Now , we are really forced to start looking at things in a completely new way .
The study relies not on an examination of regular ‘ nuclear ’ DNA , but rather mitochondrial DNA .
As this article in AFP explains , “ All animals also have DNA in their mitochondria , which are the tiny structures inside each cell that convert @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cells can use .
Mitochondria contain 37 genes , and one of them , known as COI , is used to do DNA barcoding .
Unlike the genes in nuclear DNA , which can differ greatly from species to species , all animals have the same set of mitochondrial DNA , providing a common basis for comparison .
Around 2002 , Canadian molecular biologist Paul Hebert–who coined the term “ DNA barcode ” –figured out a way to identify species by analysing the COI gene .
“ The mitochondrial sequence has proved perfect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just the right balance of two conflicting properties , ” said Thaler .
On the one hand , the COI gene sequence is similar across all animals , making it easy to pick out and compare .
On the other hand , these mitochondrial snippets are different enough to be able to distinguish between each species .
In analysing the barcodes across 100,000 species , the researchers found a telltale sign showing that almost all the animals emerged about the same time as humans .
What they saw was a lack of variation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which are the slight changes in DNA across generations that neither help nor hurt an individual ’ s chances of survival .
In other words , they were irrelevant in terms of the natural and sexual drivers of evolution .
How similar or not these “ neutral ” mutations are to each other is like tree rings – they reveal the approximate age of a species.
” • Prominent Yale Professor Explains How Darwin ’ s Theory Of Evolution Doesn ’ t Match The Science • 9 Scientific Facts Prove The “ Theory @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Of How We Evolve Let ’ s look at the implications of the study , which you can read in full here .
A few points made in the conclusion are of interest .
The same explanation offered for the sequence variation found among modern humans applies equally to the modern populations of essentially all other animal species .
Namely that the extant population , no matter what its current size or similarity to fossils of any age , has expanded from mitochondrial uniformity within the past 200,000 years .
Nonhuman animals , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are often considered “ model systems ” whose results can be extrapolated to humans .
The direction of inference is reversible .
Fossil evidence for mammalian evolution in Africa implies that most species started with small founding populations and later expanded [ 157 ] and sequence analysis has been interpreted to suggest that the last ice age created widespread conditions for a subsequent expansion [ 158 ] .
The picture we get here is that somewhere in the past , no farther back than 200,000 years ago , most or all animal species @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mitochondrial clock set to 0 .
There is evidence that these species ‘ started with small founding populations and later expanded , ’ and that extreme conditions — like the last ice age — can give rise to a subsequent expansion .
It almost resembles the Noah ’ s Ark scenario , doesn ’ t it ?
A cataclysmic flood wipes out all humans and animals on the planet except a small few of each species , who begin again to proliferate anew once the flood ends and the Earth becomes habitable .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , we would not be taking species from the previous world before the catastrophe , because their mitochondrial clocks would not be set to 0 .
Rather , we have to see it as a new ‘ seeding ’ of species on the planet after a catastrophe wipes out most or all of the species that were there before .
And who would be the ones doing the seeding ?
You guessed it .
One or more advanced extraterrestrial races .
It was back in my grade 8 history class that I first @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prevalent in molding the history of the planet , as we were all asked to do a critical analysis of Erich Von Daniken ’ s ‘ Chariots of the Gods.
’ I recall being perplexed that we were actually reading this in school , and I certainly didn ’ t have the discernment at the time to notice that it was part of a campaign to make us all work on discrediting Von Daniken ’ s claims based on a lack of scientific evidence .
I remember being not-so-subtly persuaded by the teacher @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of analysis , but given that at the time I would write whatever would give me the best mark , I followed suit .
It seems to me that this was an experimental ‘ pre-emptive strike ’ on our minds by the scientific establishment .
Whether or not this actually succeeded in making people have a more skeptical bent about such matters , I ’ m not sure .
Today , the idea that extraterrestrial civilizations are and have always been involved in our physical , mental/emotional and spiritual evolution is quite common @ @ @ @ @ @ @ evolved beings are seen to be able to work directly in the genetic manipulation of species .
For example , the idea that we are part of a ‘ Grand Experiment ’ has been proposed by whistleblower / speaker Corey Goode , who says that a ‘ Super Federation ’ of extraterrestrial beings are conducting 22 genetic experiments on the Earth that are purportedly designed to enhance humanity ’ s evolution .
Is it possible that the evolution of the human race has been fostered in part by the genetic seeding of today @ @ @ @ @ @ @ advanced extraterrestrial civilizations almost 200,000 years ago ?
Well , at least there is some new scientific evidence that leads us to ponder this possibility .

If you have been following genetic and epigenetic studies conducted within the edifices of modern science over the past couple of decades, you likely have suspected what I am about to tell you: Mr. Darwin has already left the building, his disheveled ‘Theory of Evolution’ in tow.
A massive new genetic study by Mark Stoeckle from The Rockefeller University in New York and David Thaler at the University of Basel in Switzerland puts a few more nails into an already-rotting coffin, opening the door for new theories about our origins and the mechanisms behind the evolution of species on our planet.
Challenges To Convention
In the conventional narrative of how evolution proceeds through survival-of-the-fittest and adaptation to new environments based on random genetic mutations, it is natural to expect that species with large, far-flung populations like ants and humans will become more genetically diverse over time than species who remain in one milieu.
But is it true?
“The answer is no,” said Stoeckle, lead author of the study, published in the journal Human Evolution.
In fact, the genetic diversity of most species on the planet “is about the same”, no matter their history of migration, relocation or proliferation.
The study’s most startling result, perhaps, is that nine out of 10 species on Earth today, including humans, came into being 100,000 to 200,000 years ago.
“This conclusion is very surprising, and I fought against it as hard as I could,” said David Thaler.
Indeed it is surprising – since it presents a stunning invalidation of the commonplace notion that evolution on the planet has been slow, linear, progressive, and unbroken.
Previous challenges to this notion in the form of ‘missing links’ could be perceived as grounded in a lack of physical evidence which one day would be resolved. Now, we are really forced to start looking at things in a completely new way.
Study Methods
The study relies not on an examination of regular ‘nuclear’ DNA, but rather mitochondrial DNA. As this article in AFP explains,
“All animals also have DNA in their mitochondria, which are the tiny structures inside each cell that convert energy from food into a form that cells can use. Mitochondria contain 37 genes, and one of them, known as COI, is used to do DNA barcoding.
Unlike the genes in nuclear DNA, which can differ greatly from species to species, all animals have the same set of mitochondrial DNA, providing a common basis for comparison.
Around 2002, Canadian molecular biologist Paul Hebert–who coined the term “DNA barcode”–figured out a way to identify species by analysing the COI gene.
“The mitochondrial sequence has proved perfect for this all-animal approach because it has just the right balance of two conflicting properties,” said Thaler.
On the one hand, the COI gene sequence is similar across all animals, making it easy to pick out and compare. On the other hand, these mitochondrial snippets are different enough to be able to distinguish between each species.
In analysing the barcodes across 100,000 species, the researchers found a telltale sign showing that almost all the animals emerged about the same time as humans.
What they saw was a lack of variation in so-called “neutral” mutations, which are the slight changes in DNA across generations that neither help nor hurt an individual’s chances of survival.
In other words, they were irrelevant in terms of the natural and sexual drivers of evolution. How similar or not these “neutral” mutations are to each other is like tree rings – they reveal the approximate age of a species.”
Alternative Theory Of How We Evolve
Let’s look at the implications of the study, which you can read in full here. A few points made in the conclusion are of interest.
The same explanation offered for the sequence variation found among modern humans applies equally to the modern populations of essentially all other animal species.
Namely that the extant population, no matter what its current size or similarity to fossils of any age, has expanded from mitochondrial uniformity within the past 200,000 years.
Nonhuman animals, as well as bacteria and yeast, are often considered “model systems” whose results can be extrapolated to humans. The direction of inference is reversible.
Fossil evidence for mammalian evolution in Africa implies that most species started with small founding populations and later expanded [157] and sequence analysis has been interpreted to suggest that the last ice age created widespread conditions for a subsequent expansion [158].
The picture we get here is that somewhere in the past, no farther back than 200,000 years ago, most or all animal species ‘got started,’ with a mitochondrial clock set to 0.
There is evidence that these species ‘started with small founding populations and later expanded,’ and that extreme conditions — like the last ice age — can give rise to a subsequent expansion.
It almost resembles the Noah’s Ark scenario, doesn’t it? A cataclysmic flood wipes out all humans and animals on the planet except a small few of each species, who begin again to proliferate anew once the flood ends and the Earth becomes habitable.
Extraterrestrial Intervention
But to really make this idea fit, we would not be taking species from the previous world before the catastrophe, because their mitochondrial clocks would not be set to 0.
Rather, we have to see it as a new ‘seeding’ of species on the planet after a catastrophe wipes out most or all of the species that were there before. And who would be the ones doing the seeding? You guessed it. One or more advanced extraterrestrial races.
It was back in my grade 8 history class that I first came across claims that extraterrestrial races were prevalent in molding the history of the planet, as we were all asked to do a critical analysis of Erich Von Daniken’s ‘Chariots of the Gods.’
I recall being perplexed that we were actually reading this in school, and I certainly didn’t have the discernment at the time to notice that it was part of a campaign to make us all work on discrediting Von Daniken’s claims based on a lack of scientific evidence.
I remember being not-so-subtly persuaded by the teacher that this was the only reasonable line of analysis, but given that at the time I would write whatever would give me the best mark, I followed suit.
It seems to me that this was an experimental ‘pre-emptive strike’ on our minds by the scientific establishment. Whether or not this actually succeeded in making people have a more skeptical bent about such matters, I’m not sure.
Today, the idea that extraterrestrial civilizations are and have always been involved in our physical, mental/emotional and spiritual evolution is quite common within the awakening community.
More highly evolved beings are seen to be able to work directly in the genetic manipulation of species.
For example, the idea that we are part of a ‘Grand Experiment’ has been proposed by whistleblower / speaker Corey Goode, who says that a ‘Super Federation’ of extraterrestrial beings are conducting 22 genetic experiments on the Earth that are purportedly designed to enhance humanity’s evolution.
Is it possible that the evolution of the human race has been fostered in part by the genetic seeding of today’s human and animal kingdom by advanced extraterrestrial civilizations almost 200,000 years ago? Well, at least there is some new scientific evidence that leads us to ponder this possibility.
Reference: Collective-evolution.com


humansarefree--2020-03-16--How Many People REALLY Have Coronavirus?

Note : this article contains several major points .
I could have written it as four or five separate pieces .
But because the points are related , they ’ re under one roof here .
I ask serious readers to dig in .
The other day , I was in a UPS store , and a customer was paying for a large box he was sending to Florida .
I asked him what was in the box .
The majority of the people stripping items off store shelves know nothing about the virus , and if they did , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ re acting like frothing marauders because other people are , too .
“ I ’ ve got to get paper towels and pet food because everyone else is hoarding them.
” Now there ’ s REAL contagion .
The corollary : If no one were hoarding , store shelves would be adequately stocked , and shopping would be a relatively calm affair .
Quarantines , lockdowns , the advice to maintain “ social distancing , ” and wall-to-wall propaganda about “ transmission of the virus ” have resulted in mass cancelation of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ venues .
Untold numbers of small businesses are in serious trouble .
This is a direct attack on the economy .
It is also a ripping of the right to “ peaceably assemble , ” one of the natural freedoms embodied in the 1st Amendment to the Constitution .
As usual , “ the threat to public safety and health ” is invoked to override freedoms and rights .
You would think the public sees through this tired excuse for dictatorial control , but it is not the case .
Parental government as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ minds .
“ Well , sure , they ’ re taking care of us.
” If you believe that , I have condos for sale on the far side of the moon .
At another level , quarantines serve to enforce the idea that all people are medical patients for their whole lives — and , therefore , they must follow medical orders .
Get tested , diagnosed , drugged , vaccinated .
For what ?
For all possible diseases and infections .
As far as the coronavirus is concerned , forget about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ What about the widespread diagnostic test for the virus in humans ?
Is this PCR test accurate ?
Is it useful ?
I keep coming back to the issue , because the whole designation of a “ coronavirus case , ” if it means anything at all , depends on the veracity of the test — not in a lab or a medical journal , but in life , in the world .
I repeat what I wrote in a recent article : Outside of China , the most widely used test is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ done with tremendous care , because contamination with irrelevant microbes and cellular material can yield a misleading and absurd result .
The PCR , it is claimed , can take a tiny , tiny bit of material from a patient and blow it up many times , so it can be identified .
“ This is the coronavirus .
This patient is infected.
” Not only that , the test ’ s proponents assert that , quite easily , the PCR can also determine the AMOUNT of virus in the patient ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
Because , to even begin talking about the patient ever getting sick , he must have millions and millions of coronavirus actively replicating in his body .
There are people ( and I ’ m one of them ) who challenge the claim that the PCR can show how much virus is in the patient ’ s body .
The experts try to brush us off — we don ’ t understand the intricacies of the test , it ’ s highly technical , we ’ re not qualified to make a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ searching for a way around this futile argument .
In the process , I ’ ve discovered something important about the PCR .
I SEE NO EVIDENCE THAT THE ACCURACY OF THE TEST HAS EVER BEEN PROVEN .
Let me explain .
You bring your car to a good repair shop .
The mechanics hook it up to a device and run a test to diagnose what ’ s causing the car to stall .
Who says their tests are accurate ?
At some point in the past , these diagnostic procedures have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ work properly .
And sure enough , when the mechanics say , “ We ’ ve found the problem , ” and when they correct that problem , you drive the car and it doesn ’ t stall anymore .
This is called a real-life result .
This is not the situation re the PCR .
Its proponents claim it can count how much virus is in a patient ’ s body — how much of a particular virus .
But where is the proof , in real-life terms , that the PCR @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proof ever established ?
When I say proof , I don ’ t mean technical mumbo-jumbo .
I ’ m not referring to the highly dense language these scientists use among themselves .
I ’ m talking about real live human patients , and results .
After all , if the PCR is being used to diagnose people , and if the results are being used to count the number of coronavirus cases in various countries , and if the number of cases forms the basis for , say , locking down the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ THE TEST IS IMPORTANT , WOULDN ’ T YOU SAY ?
I have seen no wide-ranging proof that the PCR was ever checked properly , when it was first introduced , to show it could do what researchers say it can do .
I have come up with a process — a simple process — which will check the veracity of the PCR .
It should have been carried out decades ago .
The fact that it wasn ’ t is an enormous scandal .
Here it is .
From a hundred patients @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The PCR lab people don ’ t take the samples .
They don ’ t ever see the patients or know who they are .
The lab professionals run these hundred samples through the PCR , obtain results , and then report : what virus did they find in each case , and how much of that virus did they find ?
Let ’ s say , in six instances , the lab techs claim they found a great amount of virus in the patients .
Well , those patients should be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
“ We ’ ve determined that patients 4 , 9 , 32 , 54 , 65 , and 86 all have a huge amount of virus in their bodies.
” “ Interesting .
Thanks .
Let ’ s see .
Hmm .
Turns out these people are fit as a fiddle .
Not sick .
I guess your test didn ’ t work .
It ’ s a flop.
” Or maybe the test does work .
The six patients are sick .
LET ’ S FIND OUT .
IN THE WORLD @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s what I mean by real-life results .
No jive , no tap dancing .
There is more .
This experiment with the hundred patients ?
It should be done , not just once , but many times .
A hundred patients here at this facility , a hundred patients there at that facility .
Thirty or forty different facilities , and thirty or forty different sets of a hundred patients .
It should be done by independent scientists without conflicts of interest .
It should have been done decades ago .
I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ THE TEST WAS NEVER PROPERLY TESTED .
A GIANT SCANDAL .
Think about what that means .
Now let ’ s go to China , where we ’ re told the majority of people who “ have the virus ” reside .
What diagnostic test are they using there ?
CT scans of the lungs .
Looking for what ?
Pneumonia .
Why ?
Because it ’ s being called the number one symptom of coronavirus infection .
Well , pneumonia has many causes , none of which needs the presence of a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Number two , roughly 300,000 people in China die of pneumonia every year — long before the supposed coronavirus emerged .
And number three , in the city of Wuhan , where the “ epidemic ” supposedly started , the air quality is horrific .
Last summer , protests on the streets of Wuhan attested to citizen outrage at the problem .
And , breaking news : disastrous air quality can cause pneumonia — no germs of any kind necessary .
But of course , we can sweep all these concerns off @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cares about the accuracy of tests ?
If people in Los Angeles are fighting over who gets the last six rolls of toilet paper , that ’ s all the proof we need : this is a global epidemic caused by a virus .
Right ?
Finally , I ’ ll make a few comments concerning the ‘ BUT WHAT ABOUT THIS ’ PEOPLE .
They have endless questions centering on reports of corona cases in this country , that country , this city , that town , another planet , another galaxy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ questions .
There is a basic point covering all the questions : DO NOT ASSUME THE PEOPLE WHO ARE SICK IN VARIOUS PLACES ARE ALL SUFFERING FROM THE SAME CAUSE .
You might want to read that statement several times .
Since the diagnostic tests for the virus are inaccurate , wrong-headed , and absurd , the LUMPING OF ALL THESE SICK PEOPLE EVERYWHERE UNDER THE SAME LABEL — CORONAVIRUS — IS MEANINGLESS AND DECEPTIVE .
Don ’ t fall for it .
Be smarter than that .
Stop trying to use one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the virus .
And furthermore , don ’ t make the false assumption that all these reported coronavirus cases are the result of NEW disease or never-before-seen disease .
Where people are genuinely ill , many or most of them have the same health conditions that have been affecting humans for a long , long time — now recycled and re-labeled CORONAVIRUS .
I ’ m giving you insights I gained in 1987 while researching AIDS .
In a nutshell , I took the groups the CDC claimed were at high-risk for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ countries , IV street drug users , gay men , hemophiliacs — and found that , for the most part , the groups were suffering from very old diseases and long-standing horrendous environmental conditions .
Nothing to do with HIV .
And where new illness was present , the causes were mainly chemical toxicity .
“ It has to be all coronavirus or all something else.
” Wrong .
False .
Misguided .
Baloney .
Start over .
I discovered this central con-hustle of the medical cartel 34 years ago , and it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the current “ epidemic.
” For example , for those people researching 5G technology and its harmful health effects , stop stretching your necks trying to prove that 5G has to be THE real and single cause of ALL supposed corona cases .
If you show 5G applies to one or two areas where people are being falsely labeled with the virus , you ’ ve done a major service .
If you can ’ t prove 5G applies to other areas , that ’ s not a problem .
We ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Some people are sick because of X .
Others because of Y .
Others because of Z .
Still others are not sick at all .
But ALL OF THEM are being falsely corralled under the LABEL of coronavirus .
We don ’ t need to replace one fake label with another single label .
Frankly , to use a technical term , this bullshit needs to stop .
If you ’ re somewhat puzzled by this article , go back and read it again .
Keep doing that until it comes clear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1987 , I had the same facts in front of me , the same basic facts I ‘ ve presented in this article — and it took me three months to realize the implications and see where I ’ d bought the big con .
The biggest con of all : THIS EPIDEMIC IS ONE THING .

Note: this article contains several major points. I could have written it as four or five separate pieces. But because the points are related, they’re under one roof here. I ask serious readers to dig in.
The other day, I was in a UPS store, and a customer was paying for a large box he was sending to Florida. I asked him what was in the box.
He said, “Toilet paper.”
The new economy.
The majority of the people stripping items off store shelves know nothing about the virus, and if they did, they wouldn’t care. They’re acting like frothing marauders because other people are, too.
“I’ve got to get paper towels and pet food because everyone else is hoarding them.” Now there’s REAL contagion.
The corollary: If no one were hoarding, store shelves would be adequately stocked, and shopping would be a relatively calm affair.
Quarantines, lockdowns, the advice to maintain “social distancing,” and wall-to-wall propaganda about “transmission of the virus” have resulted in mass cancelation of public events and the shuttering of large venues.
Untold numbers of small businesses are in serious trouble. This is a direct attack on the economy.
It is also a ripping of the right to “peaceably assemble,” one of the natural freedoms embodied in the 1st Amendment to the Constitution.
As usual, “the threat to public safety and health” is invoked to override freedoms and rights.
You would think the public sees through this tired excuse for dictatorial control, but it is not the case. Parental government as a concept and a practice has invaded minds.
“Well, sure, they’re taking care of us.” If you believe that, I have condos for sale on the far side of the moon.
At another level, quarantines serve to enforce the idea that all people are medical patients for their whole lives — and, therefore, they must follow medical orders. Get tested, diagnosed, drugged, vaccinated. For what? For all possible diseases and infections.
As far as the coronavirus is concerned, forget about contagion and transmission for the moment. What about the widespread diagnostic test for the virus in humans? Is this PCR test accurate? Is it useful?
I keep coming back to the issue, because the whole designation of a “coronavirus case,” if it means anything at all, depends on the veracity of the test — not in a lab or a medical journal, but in life, in the world.
I repeat what I wrote in a recent article: Outside of China, the most widely used test is called the PCR. It must be done with tremendous care, because contamination with irrelevant microbes and cellular material can yield a misleading and absurd result.
The PCR, it is claimed, can take a tiny, tiny bit of material from a patient and blow it up many times, so it can be identified. “This is the coronavirus. This patient is infected.”
Not only that, the test’s proponents assert that, quite easily, the PCR can also determine the AMOUNT of virus in the patient’s body. Why is that vitally important?
Because, to even begin talking about the patient ever getting sick, he must have millions and millions of coronavirus actively replicating in his body.
There are people (and I’m one of them) who challenge the claim that the PCR can show how much virus is in the patient’s body. The experts try to brush us off — we don’t understand the intricacies of the test, it’s highly technical, we’re not qualified to make a judgment, etc..
I’ve been searching for a way around this futile argument. In the process, I’ve discovered something important about the PCR. I SEE NO EVIDENCE THAT THE ACCURACY OF THE TEST HAS EVER BEEN PROVEN.
Let me explain. You bring your car to a good repair shop. The mechanics hook it up to a device and run a test to diagnose what’s causing the car to stall. Who says their tests are accurate?
At some point in the past, these diagnostic procedures have been vetted, to make sure they work properly.
And sure enough, when the mechanics say, “We’ve found the problem,” and when they correct that problem, you drive the car and it doesn’t stall anymore. This is called a real-life result.
This is not the situation re the PCR. Its proponents claim it can count how much virus is in a patient’s body — how much of a particular virus.
But where is the proof, in real-life terms, that the PCR can do that? How was that proof ever established?
When I say proof, I don’t mean technical mumbo-jumbo. I’m not referring to the highly dense language these scientists use among themselves. I’m talking about real live human patients, and results.
After all, if the PCR is being used to diagnose people, and if the results are being used to count the number of coronavirus cases in various countries, and if the number of cases forms the basis for, say, locking down the whole of Italy in a mass quarantine… THE TEST IS IMPORTANT, WOULDN’T YOU SAY?
I have seen no wide-ranging proof that the PCR was ever checked properly, when it was first introduced, to show it could do what researchers say it can do.
WHO TESTED THE TEST?
I have come up with a process — a simple process — which will check the veracity of the PCR. It should have been carried out decades ago. The fact that it wasn’t is an enormous scandal.
Here it is.
From a hundred patients, very small tissue samples are taken. The PCR lab people don’t take the samples. They don’t ever see the patients or know who they are.
The lab professionals run these hundred samples through the PCR, obtain results, and then report: what virus did they find in each case, and how much of that virus did they find?
Let’s say, in six instances, the lab techs claim they found a great amount of virus in the patients.
Well, those patients should be sick.
Are they? ARE THEY?
“We’ve determined that patients 4, 9, 32, 54, 65, and 86 all have a huge amount of virus in their bodies.”
“Interesting. Thanks. Let’s see. Hmm. Turns out these people are fit as a fiddle. Not sick. I guess your test didn’t work. It’s a flop.”
Or maybe the test does work. The six patients are sick. LET’S FIND OUT. IN THE WORLD, NOT IN JOURNALS.
That’s what I mean by real-life results. No jive, no tap dancing.
There is more. This experiment with the hundred patients? It should be done, not just once, but many times. A hundred patients here at this facility, a hundred patients there at that facility.
Thirty or forty different facilities, and thirty or forty different sets of a hundred patients. It should be done by independent scientists without conflicts of interest.
It should have been done decades ago. I see no evidence that it was.
THE TEST WAS NEVER PROPERLY TESTED. A GIANT SCANDAL.
Think about what that means.
Now let’s go to China, where we’re told the majority of people who “have the virus” reside. What diagnostic test are they using there? CT scans of the lungs. Looking for what? Pneumonia. Why? Because it’s being called the number one symptom of coronavirus infection.
They’re kidding, right?
Unfortunately, no.
Well, pneumonia has many causes, none of which needs the presence of a coronavirus. That’s number one.
Number two, roughly 300,000 people in China die of pneumonia every year — long before the supposed coronavirus emerged.
And number three, in the city of Wuhan, where the “epidemic” supposedly started, the air quality is horrific.
Last summer, protests on the streets of Wuhan attested to citizen outrage at the problem. And, breaking news: disastrous air quality can cause pneumonia — no germs of any kind necessary.
But of course, we can sweep all these concerns off the table because, well, who cares about the accuracy of tests? If people in Los Angeles are fighting over who gets the last six rolls of toilet paper, that’s all the proof we need: this is a global epidemic caused by a virus. Right?
Finally, I’ll make a few comments concerning the ‘BUT WHAT ABOUT THIS’ PEOPLE. They have endless questions centering on reports of corona cases in this country, that country, this city, that town, another planet, another galaxy. I have answered some of those questions.
There is a basic point covering all the questions:
DO NOT ASSUME THE PEOPLE WHO ARE SICK IN VARIOUS PLACES ARE ALL SUFFERING FROM THE SAME CAUSE.
You might want to read that statement several times.
Related: There’s A Connection Between Coronavirus And 5G
Since the diagnostic tests for the virus are inaccurate, wrong-headed, and absurd, the LUMPING OF ALL THESE SICK PEOPLE EVERYWHERE UNDER THE SAME LABEL — CORONAVIRUS — IS MEANINGLESS AND DECEPTIVE.
Don’t fall for it. Be smarter than that. Stop trying to use one explanation to account for all supposed cases of the virus.
And furthermore, don’t make the false assumption that all these reported coronavirus cases are the result of NEW disease or never-before-seen disease.
Where people are genuinely ill, many or most of them have the same health conditions that have been affecting humans for a long, long time — now recycled and re-labeled CORONAVIRUS.
I’m giving you insights I gained in 1987 while researching AIDS.
In a nutshell, I took the groups the CDC claimed were at high-risk for AIDS — Haitians, Africans in certain countries, IV street drug users, gay men, hemophiliacs — and found that, for the most part, the groups were suffering from very old diseases and long-standing horrendous environmental conditions. Nothing to do with HIV. And where new illness was present, the causes were mainly chemical toxicity.
“It has to be all coronavirus or all something else.” Wrong. False. Misguided. Baloney. Start over.
I discovered this central con-hustle of the medical cartel 34 years ago, and it applies precisely and across the board, in the current “epidemic.”
For example, for those people researching 5G technology and its harmful health effects, stop stretching your necks trying to prove that 5G has to be THE real and single cause of ALL supposed corona cases.
If you show 5G applies to one or two areas where people are being falsely labeled with the virus, you’ve done a major service. If you can’t prove 5G applies to other areas, that’s not a problem.
We’re looking at multiple factors here. Some people are sick because of X. Others because of Y. Others because of Z. Still others are not sick at all.
But ALL OF THEM are being falsely corralled under the LABEL of coronavirus.
We don’t need to replace one fake label with another single label.
Frankly, to use a technical term, this bullshit needs to stop.
If you’re somewhat puzzled by this article, go back and read it again. Keep doing that until it comes clear.
I say this because, in 1987, I had the same facts in front of me, the same basic facts I ‘ve presented in this article — and it took me three months to realize the implications and see where I’d bought the big con.
The biggest con of all: THIS EPIDEMIC IS ONE THING.
No. It isn’t.
By Jon Rappoport, Guest writer


humansarefree--2020-03-17--Debating The Geoengineering Reality: Cal Tech Scientist Douglas MacMartin Vs. Dane Wigington

In regard to critically important issues that have extreme ramifications , live on air debates of verifiable facts are absolutely essential .
Global climate engineering programs pose an immense and immediate threat to the Earth ’ s life support systems ( and thus the entire web of life ) .
A live on-air public debate has now taken place on WBAI radio in New York ( hosted by Geoff Brady ) in order to specifically address the ongoing global geoengineering reality .
Cal Tech / Cornell / MIT scientist Douglas MacMartin says climate engineering is not occurring .
Dane Wigington @ @ @ @ @ @ @ world ’ s largest and most visited geoengineering website ) states available data makes overwhelmingly clear that global geoengineering programs have been deployed for decades with catastrophic results .
Who is telling the truth and backing it up with verifiable facts ?
View this fast moving 1 hour video and decide for yourself .
Reading and reviewing the document excerpts shown in this video is essential , momentarily stopping the video in order to do so is recommended .
We must publicly expose academicians who are helping to cover the tracks of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fully awakened to the geoengineering atrocities , those that are accomplices to the cover-up should be held legally and morally accountable in a court of law .
All of us are needed in the critical battle to expose and halt climate engineering , sharing credible data is key .

In regard to critically important issues that have extreme ramifications, live on air debates of verifiable facts are absolutely essential.
Global climate engineering programs pose an immense and immediate threat to the Earth’s life support systems (and thus the entire web of life).
A live on-air public debate has now taken place on WBAI radio in New York (hosted by Geoff Brady) in order to specifically address the ongoing global geoengineering reality.
Cal Tech / Cornell / MIT scientist Douglas MacMartin says climate engineering is not occurring.
Dane Wigington, lead researcher for GeoengineeringWatch.org (the world’s largest and most visited geoengineering website) states available data makes overwhelmingly clear that global geoengineering programs have been deployed for decades with catastrophic results.
Who is telling the truth and backing it up with verifiable facts? View this fast moving 1 hour video and decide for yourself.
Reading and reviewing the document excerpts shown in this video is essential, momentarily stopping the video in order to do so is recommended.
We must publicly expose academicians who are helping to cover the tracks of the climate engineers.
Once the public is fully awakened to the geoengineering atrocities, those that are accomplices to the cover-up should be held legally and morally accountable in a court of law.
All of us are needed in the critical battle to expose and halt climate engineering, sharing credible data is key.
Sources: GeoengineeringWatch.org; YouTube.com