humansarefree--2020-12-03--Budding a Totalitarian State: UK Wants to Use Army to Fight ‘Anti-Vaccine Propaganda’ Online

With the impending rollout of a Covid-19 vaccine , a UK military cyber unit has been tasked to crack down on “ online propaganda against vaccines.
” Questioning something that will be injected into your body is now deemed radical .
With the anti-lockdown narrative beginning to become more prominent throughout the UK following the arrest of 150 people over the past weekend , a clampdown on independent thought is looming .
The arrests were made because of anti-lockdown protests in London , and the heavy-handed nature of dealing with these protests is extraordinarily alarming .
Now the crackdown is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of free speech is becoming ever more blatant and cynical .
The Sunday Times reported that there is even a brazen operation to suppress people ’ s fundamental right to express their opinion .
The UK authorities intend on literally using military intelligence brigades to manage the elimination of free speech .
The primary target of this military operation is what the Times calls “ anti-vax militants ” and supposed propaganda content across the internet and social media .
The unit that will be leading this operation are the renowned 77th Brigade .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ conduct information warfare and was initially conceived to assist in operations against the Taliban and Al-Qaeda .
The covert unit often works in cohesion with psychological operations teams within the army .
The 77th Brigade is a unit that combines the Army and Army Reserves for the purpose of non-lethal warfare and behavioural influence .
The unit is currently based at Denison Barracks in Berkshire .
It bills itself as “ an agent of change ” that uses “ targeted information ” activity and online outreach to assist with military objectives .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ narrative across social media platforms to ensure that the general conversation reflects the desired viewpoint is a powerful tool .
Throughout 2020 the 77th Brigade has been coordinating with the Cabinet Office to counter ‘ misinformation ’ related to Covid-19 .
It is interesting to note that the recently appointed Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Covid Vaccine Deployment , Nadhim Zahawi , is the co-founder of YouGov .
Targeting online polls is a specific method of psychological impression , as when people see their view is not the common understanding of reality @ @ @ @ @ @ @ opinion on a specific topic .
The interpretation of who is deemed to be an “ anti-vaccine militant ” is subjective , and there is certainly a wide scope for the abuse of such operations .
Authorities have their own distorted idea of what constitutes ‘ propaganda ’ – and the damning label can potentially be slapped on anyone who dares to raise concerns about the imminent vaccines that have been developed within an unprecedented timeframe .
Critiquing or even questioning any potential side effects or the motives behind the vaccine could result @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the internet .
The irony of calling this an operation against “ propaganda content ” must not be lost on those who are executing it .
Such an operation is an attempt to control free speech , it is an extraordinarily dangerous precedent to set and the death of debate is a very slippery slope .
Sliding into a dictatorial state where people can not oppose the authorities ’ actions or plans leaves us all at risk of losing our fundamental human right to freedom of speech .
An elite force , that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ minds , is now being utilised against ‘ state actors ’ spreading ‘ anti-vaccine propaganda ’ .
The Ministry of Defence claims the UK population will not be targeted , but we have all seen how easy it is for the government to ascribe any dissent to malign foreign influence , thus devaluing any legitimate concerns of its citizens .
This is a terrifying example of UK authorities manifesting the totalitarian power that they believe they possess .
The silencing of those who legitimately are sceptical about the circumstances in which a vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ right to voice their fears .
No matter how mad a conspiracy theory or how deluded an individual may be , they should always retain the right to speak their mind without fear of retribution , so long as they are not doing so in a threatening manner .
The UK is purchasing over 350 million doses of the Covid-19 vaccine from various pharmaceutical companies .
The panic in which the vaccine was formulated and subsequently approved should lead to questions about its efficacy and safety .
In any other situation , these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ concerns .
In the world we live in , every decision you make is recorded and watched , and a calculation as to why you elected to make that decision is made .
Many of your thoughts are predetermined and fabricated before you even think them , you do not even question whether they are your own .
Advertising so imperceptible , you are often blissfully unaware of how easily and comprehensively your personality is understood .
Society is starting to truly appreciate the power that data can hold .
It is widely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the control they have obtained and are diminishing their user ’ s right to privacy .
We are seeing various technologies being maltreated by publicly listed corporations for profit , and the control they can have over your daily life grows with every second you engage with their technology .
Now , just imagine the power a state-backed cyber warfare unit could have .
The mission that the 77th Brigade is on and its methods are still only vaguely understood – but the state already possesses a wide range of methods for covert @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Threat Research Intelligence Group ( JTRIG ) , for example , boasts an arsenal of over 200 “ info-weapons , ” ranging from spoofed SMS messages to artificially increasing traffic to a specific website and manipulating online polls .
With society ’ s growing reliance on technology to guide our collective consciousness , controlling this battlefield could be a means to conquer our minds and effectively police our thoughts .
Thinking the wrong thing could become a crime , and we could find ourselves living in a state of perpetual anxiety where the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The ever-darkening addiction to a glass screen that ’ s on your person 24 hours a day and knows who you are with more precision than you know yourself is not natural .
Promoting products you didn ’ t realise you needed until they were thrust before your eyes .
Reading various articles all presented at particular moments on specific platforms to ensure the commentary results in you attaining the preferred conclusion .
The majority of many people ’ s lives are now spent interacting with screens and lockdown has only enhanced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ why the UK authorities choose to focus their attention on controlling what is permitted to be shared online .
By controlling these mediums of communication with subtle manipulation that is invisible , the illusion of control can be achieved by phantom force that remains intangible .
Using technology to understand how modern society thinks and behaves enables state actors to accurately predict their population ’ s reaction to specific information and prepare for the outlawed conjecture .
This , in combination with silencing the critics , allows a single narrative to form which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proportion of society .
The power to infect people ’ s minds is unlike any political tool in history .
Creating the realms of perception and concocting the premeditated response enables the infiltration of free thought .
What news-related media impacts your impression of reality and the ability to impact what you believe to be your individual opinion can not be underestimated .
Your activity and behaviour online provides a more precise picture of who you really are than your ego would ever allow .
Therefore , those with the access to your @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and what your core beliefs are .
If these do not correlate with their own ambitions , a campaign of misinformation and manipulation can be initiated to attempt to alter these points of view .
Fear hangs heavy in the air and the greatest fear of all is , no one is sure what they are afraid of .
The revelation about the conduct of the 77th Brigade sheds some light on the concise operation against free thought , yet the most horrifying elements of control remain disguised in broad daylight and inconspicuous @ @ @ @ @ @ @ free ; you have to fight for it .

“Those who profess to favor freedom and yet depreciate agitation, are people who want crops without ploughing the ground; they want rain without thunder and lightning; they want the ocean without the roar of its many waters. The struggle may be a moral one, or it may be a physical one, or it may be both. But it must be a struggle. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will.” — Frederick Douglass
So you’ve answered Shakespeare’s question: to be or not to be? What’s next? I hate to break it to you; it only gets harder. Now you must answer an even more daunting question: fight for freedom or fight for empire?
It’s a theme that has haunted the human condition since time immemorial. Indeed, a most intimidating mytheme that has both undermined and propelled the evolution of our species at different times in the overall human leitmotif.
On the one side is Empire: chock-full of status quo junkies and conditioned masses (brainwashed citizens), sycophantic police and military members who blindly obey a corrupt chain of command (storm troopers), and a power-tripping leadership whose power has become so absolute that it can be nothing short of absolutely corrupt (Emperor Palpatine/Darth Vader).
On the other side is Freedom: Free men and women questioning and resisting authority to the nth degree (the rebel alliance/Yoda).
Unfortunately, as it stands in our world, the odds are grotesquely in favor of Empire, and the rebels face a daunting, if not impossible challenge: Free the unfree while somehow remaining free within a militarized police state that upholds an ominous, globalized empire hell-bent on raping and plundering the planet to keep the rich in power and the poor in squalor.
For Neo, in the movie The Matrix, the choice is incredibly clear: Freedom. He would rather the pain that comes from the truth of the Desert of the Real, than the ominous lie that is the Matrix. But the choice is also very clear for Cypher: Empire.
As he insouciantly put it, “Why, oh why, didn’t I choose the blue pill?”
Cypher gives up, cowardly deciding ignorance is bliss, forfeiting truth. Neo rises up, courageously deciding knowledge is pain, but so rewarding that it’s worth it.
Similarly, in the movie Avatar, the choice is beyond clear to Jake Sully: Freedom. Get busy remaining a crippled victim of an ego-centric, oppressive, over-reaching military or get busy becoming an interdependent hero with eco-centric morals and universal empathy and compassion?
But the choice is also very clear for Colonel Miles Quaritch: Empire. He believes so blindly in the military code that his own loyalty and ego-centrism blinds him to the sheer magnitude of his immoral, uncompassionate, mass-destructive, murderous, and ecocidal rampage of a peaceful people and an interdependent cosmos.
Likewise in the movie Divergent, the choice is clear to Tris Prior: Freedom. She perfects a balance with Abnegation (selflessness), Amity (peacefulness), Candor (honesty), Dauntlessness (bravery), and Erudition (intelligence), in order to leverage freedom into an otherwise unfree system of human governance.
But the choice is also clear for the ominous Erudite leader Jeanine Mathews: Empire. She is thoroughly convinced that oppressive divisiveness is the only way to maintain order, not realizing that her blind obedience is at the cost of truth itself.
I could go on and on. There are countless examples throughout human history and within human literature showcasing precisely this same reoccurring theme: fight for freedom, or fight for empire?
It’s a choice no one else can make for us. Indeed, even giving up our choice to an authority is itself a choice. We alone are responsible for how we answer this most daunting, but most powerful, question.
The good thing is, the majority of us understand the now cliché phrase: “with great power comes great responsibility.” The bad thing is, although we understand it, we have been overwhelmingly negligent of it. Let’s break it down as it applies to us, and the state of the world today.
The Fight for Empire (Plutocratic Tyranny)
“No act of rebellion can be effective, much less moral, unless it first takes into account reality, no matter how bleak that reality.” – Chris Hedges
As it stands, we are not free. The reality of our current system of human governance is bleak indeed.
Nobody who lives in a society whose citizens are subject to constant surveillance, indefinite detention, systematic debt slavery, whose courts legalize the crimes of the state, and whose prisons profit off the petty crimes of its people, can be described as free.
Such a society is nothing less than totalitarian in nature, as corruption and tyrannical hierarchies plague it to no end.
It is a society based upon moneyed-masters and debt-slaves. A culture of greedy, power-hungry, warmongering, exploitative rulers with a bloated and violent military industrial complex backing it up, and an ignorant, traumatized, and immobilized populous with no recourse.
The very notion of wealth itself becomes equal parts illusion and yoke for the conditioned masses who, paraphrasing Noam Chomsky, “don’t even know what’s happening, and don’t even know that they don’t know.”
The yoke “jerks” the herd of brainwashed conformists this way and that, using divisive bipartisan political propaganda, homogenized by corporations with a stranglehold on power, to keep its sheeple oppressed and bleating for more authority.
The disaster situation before us is the height of a conquer-control-exploit-destroy-pollute-repeat process that has been plaguing humankind for a millennia. It is the culmination of a systematic erosion and methodical obliteration of our basic human and constitutional rights.
Like the good folks at Sustainable Man said:
“Every empire that has ever existed can point to over-exploitation of resources as the root cause of their demise. The difference between empires of the past and those of today is that we are now exhausting the entire planet at once. “Empires of the past could rise and fall and their impact would be limited to a small geographic region. This is no longer true. Today, we live in an exponential economic growth paradigm which sees no limits.”
But limit it we must, lest we perpetuate a fundamentally unhealthy, unsustainable, unequal, and unjust system of plunder.
A clear sign of empire is an ill-informed citizenry that cannot take self-corrective measures because it is denied access to the truth and spoon fed lies by an unchallenged elite. The pathology of the plutocratic corporate elite is unprecedented.
It is a rampant illness infecting the core values of the greedy, overreaching powers that be. Power has become corrupt and will surely become absolute if those who fight for freedom don’t have the moral courage to stand up to empire.
Like Gandhi said:
“Nonviolence does not mean meek submission to the will of the evil-doer. It means the pitting of one’s whole soul against the will of the tyrant. Working under this law of our being, it is possible for a single individual to defy the whole might of an unjust empire to save his honor, his spirituality, his soul and lay the foundation for that empire’s fall… or its regeneration.”
The Fight for Freedom (Democratic Anarchy)
“Once I thought that to be human was the highest aim a man could have, but I see now that it was meant to destroy me. Today I am proud to say that I am inhuman, that I belong not to men and governments, that I have nothing to do with creeds and principles. I have nothing to do with the creaking machinery of humanity – I belong to the earth!” – Henry Miller, Tropic of Cancer
The fight for freedom is a fight for non-violent (but ruthless and robust) anarchy: a healthy eco-centric, egalitarian balance between nature and the human soul.
It is a fight to create something new: a peaceful, courage-based, relationship-based lifestyle that has the power to trump the violent, fear-based, ownership-based lifestyle that is currently plaguing the human condition.
When 90% of the casualties of war are unarmed civilians, and a third of them children; Empire’s time has come. Its tyrannical reign must be met with ruthless anarchic civil-disobedience.
When corporations in power have the authority to pick and choose where wars will be waged in order to keep the oil flowing and the greenbacks stacked against an oppressed citizenry that has been tricked into believing fractional reserve banking is okay and war is an honorable thing: Empire’s time has come. Its reign must be met with peaceful insurgency and non-violent aggression.
War is not honorable. It is first degree cowardice. No amount of physical courage displayed in a warzone can match the moral courage displayed in rebelling against the immorality of war, especially within a violent culture that has been duped into believing that war is honorable and necessary to maintain peace.
War is not peace, no matter how much a corrupt authority preaches it or a sycophantic citizenry reveres it as necessary.
Freedom is not slavery, no matter how much illusory debt a kowtowing citizenry, slaving away at thankless jobs, ignorantly attempts to pay back (debt-slavery); not realizing that it is a debt that can never be paid off.
Ignorance is not strength, no matter how much political claptrap and divisive propaganda keeps the conditioned and brainwashed masses ill-informed and anti-intellectual.
So we have a critical decision to make. Each one of us. Fight for freedom, or fight for empire. There is no wiggle room here. Red-pill Neo or blue-pill Cypher? Rebellious Han Solo or chain-of-command-following Storm Trooper?
Eco-centric Jake Sully or ego-centric Colonel Quaritch. Courageous divergence or cowardice compliance? Compassionate human being or mindless zombie? The choice is yours to make, and yours alone, and nothing short of a healthy and robust progressive human evolution is at stake.
“The rebel, possessed by inner demons and angels, is driven by vision. I do not know if the new revolutionary wave and the rebels produced by it will succeed. But I do know that without these rebels, we are doomed.” – Chris Hedges
By Gary ‘Z’ McGee, Waking Times


humansarefree--2020-12-04--U.S. Air Force Uses IoT to Monitor Hundreds of Millions of Fitness Trackers, Cars, Computers, Router

U.S. Air Force Uses IoT to Monitor Hundreds of Millions of Fitness Trackers, Cars, Computers, Routers, Etc.

For many years experts have issued serious warnings about privacy AND cybersecurity risks associated with Internet of Things ( IoT ) technology ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ) .
Nevertheless , the U.S. Air Force plans to start using it to monitor hundreds of millions of devices .
Next Step in Government Data Tracking Is the Internet of Things U.S. Air Force experiments with monitoring peripherals — from autos to fitness trackers .
WASHINGTON — U. S. government agencies from the military to law enforcement have been buying up mobile-phone data from the private @ @ @ @ @ @ @ monitoring adversaries and apprehending criminals .
Now , the U.S. Air Force is experimenting with the next step .
The Air Force Research Laboratory is testing a commercial software platform that taps mobile phones as a window onto usage of hundreds of millions of computers , routers , fitness trackers , modern automobiles and other networked devices , known collectively as the “ Internet of Things.
” — Read full article Even if the constant surveillance doesn ’ t bother you , maybe the constant radiation exposure will .
Last year , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ high levels of Electromagnetic Fields ( aka “ Electrosmog ” ) could cause health issues in a significant percentage of the population .
Sources of Electrosmog include all wireless technology – activity trackers , Apple AirPods , cell phones , home assistants ( Alexa , Google Nest , etc . )
, utility “ Smart ” Meters , WiFi routers , wireless chargers , etc .
Research has determined that wireless exposure can : • cause rashes , other skin irritations , and premature skin aging • reduce immunity to viruses and other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ animals too !
Wired internet connections are safer , more secure , and totally doable .

by B.N. Frank
For many years experts have issued serious warnings about privacy AND cybersecurity risks associated with Internet of Things (IoT) technology (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). Nevertheless, the U.S. Air Force plans to start using it to monitor hundreds of millions of devices.
From the Wall Street Journal:
Next Step in Government Data Tracking Is the Internet of Things
U.S. Air Force experiments with monitoring peripherals — from autos to fitness trackers.
WASHINGTON — U. S. government agencies from the military to law enforcement have been buying up mobile-phone data from the private sector to use in gathering intelligence, monitoring adversaries and apprehending criminals.
Now, the U.S. Air Force is experimenting with the next step.
The Air Force Research Laboratory is testing a commercial software platform that taps mobile phones as a window onto usage of hundreds of millions of computers, routers, fitness trackers, modern automobiles and other networked devices, known collectively as the “Internet of Things.” — Read full article
Even if the constant surveillance doesn’t bother you, maybe the constant radiation exposure will. Last year, the World Health Organization warned that exposure to high levels of Electromagnetic Fields (aka “Electrosmog”) could cause health issues in a significant percentage of the population. Sources of Electrosmog include all wireless technology – activity trackers, Apple AirPods, cell phones, home assistants (Alexa, Google Nest, etc.), utility “Smart” Meters, WiFi routers, wireless chargers, etc.
Research has determined that wireless exposure can:
Got pets? Exposure can affect animals too!
Wired internet connections are safer, more secure, and totally doable.
Less spying – less frying!


humansarefree--2020-12-04--Rich People & Journalists Made Exempt From Having to Enter COVID Quarantine

Journalists and rich people defined as “ high value business travellers ” will be made exempt from having to enter a 2 week COVID quarantine when they return to the UK under new rules announced by the government .
“ From 4am on Saturday , people in a number of categories will no longer have to self-isolate upon returning to England , even if they are travelling from a country not on the travel corridors list , ” reports Sky News .
Those categories include journalists , “ high value business travellers , ” performing arts professionals and wealthy sports @ @ @ @ @ @ @ returning from a country not on the UK ’ s “ travel corridor ” list has to self-isolate at home for 14 days or face escalating fines .
Public Health England said the new measures will not raise the risk of domestic transmission of coronavirus .
The rule change is being pitched as a way to help boost the economy , but many responded by framing it as a classic example of elitist privilege .
“ We are being governed by absolute fools , clowns and charlatans .
If I ’ m rich @ @ @ @ @ @ @ m immune to Covid ?
” asked one Twitter user .
“ Ah !
One rule for “ us ” and another for all the “ little people ” .
Shrewd move just when trust and social cohesion is needed , ” remarked another .
“ What a load of rubbish .
You mean those well off don ’ t need to follow “ quarantine measures , ” said another .
“ There will be some big businesses that are able to take advantage of it , ” said Paul Charles , chief @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , underscoring once again how the rules favor large transnational corporations while small businesses continue to go bust .

Journalists and rich people defined as “high value business travellers” will be made exempt from having to enter a 2 week COVID quarantine when they return to the UK under new rules announced by the government.
“From 4am on Saturday, people in a number of categories will no longer have to self-isolate upon returning to England, even if they are travelling from a country not on the travel corridors list,” reports Sky News.
Those categories include journalists, “high value business travellers,” performing arts professionals and wealthy sports stars.
Under current rules, anyone returning from a country not on the UK’s “travel corridor” list has to self-isolate at home for 14 days or face escalating fines.
Public Health England said the new measures will not raise the risk of domestic transmission of coronavirus.
New Business Traveller exemption: From 4am on Sat 5th Dec high-value business travellers💼will no longer need to self-isolate when returning to ENGLAND from a country NOT in a travel corridor, allowing more travel to support the economy and jobs. Conditions apply. — Rt Hon Grant Shapps MP (@grantshapps) December 3, 2020
The rule change is being pitched as a way to help boost the economy, but many responded by framing it as a classic example of elitist privilege.
“We are being governed by absolute fools, clowns and charlatans. If I’m rich enough to afford Business Class I’m immune to Covid?” asked one Twitter user.
“Ah! One rule for “us” and another for all the “little people”. Shrewd move just when trust and social cohesion is needed,” remarked another.
“What a load of rubbish. You mean those well off don’t need to follow “quarantine measures,” said another.
“There will be some big businesses that are able to take advantage of it,” said Paul Charles, chief executive of travel consultancy The PC Agency, underscoring once again how the rules favor large transnational corporations while small businesses continue to go bust.
Source: Summit.news


humansarefree--2020-12-05--Follow the Science (Except When the Results are Inconvenient)

During the COVID pandemic , much science is at play , treated either as gospel or hate speech , enough for science professionals to lose their jobs or be suspended from social media platforms if their views are inconvenient to the establishment ’ s narrative .
The all-knowing , all-caring , anointed guru of all things COVID , Dr Anthony Fauci , has been wrong at least as often as he has been right , with a predictive value of a coin flip .
Yet any scientific utterance from him is treated in the media as a scientific law , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he speaks convenient science .
The CDC and WHO also have a long string of flip flops regarding the Wuhan flu .
Were they following the science when they made their incorrect pronouncements ?
Or were they sticking a finger in the air , following the political winds ?
Hydroxychloroquine , a drug in common use for 6 decades , deemed safe for virtually the entire population except for the rare few with an unusual heart arrhythmia , has now been deemed as unsafe as eating rat poison or cyanide in the minds @ @ @ @ @ @ @ became popular around the same time as hydroxy was FDA approved .
Scores of individuals are injured skiing every year on American mountains .
Colorado typically has between 10 and 20 skiing related deaths every season , far more than deaths due solely to hydroxy .
Yet skiing remains popular and legal whereas hydroxy is viewed as the worst medicine in the world .
Based on science ?
What science ?
There have been 187 hydroxy studies , 122 of which were peer reviewed .
The word on Fox News and Twitter is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Neil Cavuto proclaimed when President Trump told the world he was taking it .
Yet the science says otherwise if you look at early versus late treatment of COVID , which only makes sense .
The fire department saves houses if they arrive when there is a small kitchen fire , not when the entire house is ablaze .
100 percent of these studies report positive effects for early treatment , meaning those not yet in the hospital and certainly not on a ventilator .
Yet the medical establishment and media choose only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ offers little if any benefit .
Read : CA Doctor Has 100 % Cure Rate For Over 1700 COVID Patients Using Hydroxychloroquine If Barack Obama were president and touted hydroxy as a potential therapeutic , as Trump did , Obama would be lauded and likely awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine .
But Trump hatred is so strong that so-called scientists draw a conclusion first , then focus only on data to support their conclusion , pretending any inconvenient contradictory doesn ’ t exist .
Are these are the people we want to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
Making life and death decision for hundreds of millions of Americans ?
Think of Medicare-for-all under a Biden/Harris regime .
There is also Wu-Flu testing , with no distinction between cases and positive tests , skewing results , creating panic , closing businesses and schools , and ruining the US economy .
Such a distinction would be inconvenient to the shut-it-all-down crowd who are only interested in “ surges ” and further mandates from totalitarian wannabe governors .
For more detail on cases versus tests , please read my summary of this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conclusion .
A legal ruling in Portugal found that the COVID PCR test is “ not fit for purpose ” meaning mass testing .
They determined that overly high amplification cycles lead to excessive false positives and unreasonable quarantines and business closures .
The judges determined that a positive Chinese coronavirus test has only a 3 percent chance of actually being positive .
Anthony Fauci has acknowledged this publicly when he stated that the COVID-19 test has a “ fatal flaw.
” The media chooses to ignore this court case because the ruling @ @ @ @ @ @ @ how they lionize a Swedish teenager who says humans are warming and destroying the Earth but refuse to acknowledge Portuguese judges and their opinions .
All science is equal , but some science is more equal than others , to paraphrase George Orwell .
Death counts are reported no differently than COVID cases .
Are all reported Wuhan flu deaths due to the virus or did these individuals just happen to test positive before or after death ?
George Floyd tested positive for COVID and is likely included in CNN ’ s touted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in hospice due to a terminal illness are labeled as COVID deaths ?
Is this good science or suppression of inconvenient data ?
Johns Hopkins University actually took a stab at the science of Chinese virus deaths before they decided their results were inconvenient and buried them .
Hopkins researchers noted that the number of people who died last year is the same as this year .
How could that be if hundreds of thousands are dying of the Wuhan flu ?
It turns out that increases in COVID deaths are offset by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and other ailments .
Has heart disease miraculously disappeared this year ?
Or are heart attacks being called COVID deaths ?
Perhaps the same people counting deaths have been counting votes in Philadelphia and Detroit , simply shifting enough votes from Trump to Biden to keep the totals the same but presenting a different and more convenient result .
The scientists want clinical trials .
Where are the trials on masks , social distancing , quarantining the healthy , closing the economy ?
There are none .
When a study is actually performed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the results are deemed inconvenient and buried by the scientist and corporate media .
If science were serious , as it should be , coronavirus data should be reviewed , analyzed , and presented objectively .
Instead , we are seeing the opposite , where any results inconvenient to a largely political agenda are deemed inconvenient and hidden or deleted .
Those presenting inconvenient results are castigated , maligned , and threatened by the ruling class for daring to challenge the orthodoxy .
Once upon a time , other inconvenient science , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ around the sun , were treated the same way as today ’ s anti-establishment COVID views .
All thanks to the “ progressive ” party inhabiting academia , entertainment , finance , media , sports , and much of Washington , DC , progressing not forward , but backward to the days of witchcraft and magic .
Depending on how the 2020 election ultimately turns out , evidence-based science may go the way of the dodo bird .
By Brian C Joondeph , MD — a Denver based physician and freelance writer for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other publications .

During the COVID pandemic, much science is at play, treated either as gospel or hate speech, enough for science professionals to lose their jobs or be suspended from social media platforms if their views are inconvenient to the establishment’s narrative.
The all-knowing, all-caring, anointed guru of all things COVID, Dr Anthony Fauci, has been wrong at least as often as he has been right, with a predictive value of a coin flip.
Yet any scientific utterance from him is treated in the media as a scientific law, on par with gravity, as long he speaks convenient science.
The CDC and WHO also have a long string of flip flops regarding the Wuhan flu. Were they following the science when they made their incorrect pronouncements? Or were they sticking a finger in the air, following the political winds?
Hydroxychloroquine, a drug in common use for 6 decades, deemed safe for virtually the entire population except for the rare few with an unusual heart arrhythmia, has now been deemed as unsafe as eating rat poison or cyanide in the minds of most media consumers.
Snow skiing became popular around the same time as hydroxy was FDA approved. Scores of individuals are injured skiing every year on American mountains. Colorado typically has between 10 and 20 skiing related deaths every season, far more than deaths due solely to hydroxy.
Yet skiing remains popular and legal whereas hydroxy is viewed as the worst medicine in the world. Based on science? What science?
There have been 187 hydroxy studies, 122 of which were peer reviewed. The word on Fox News and Twitter is that hydroxy will kill you, as Neil Cavuto proclaimed when President Trump told the world he was taking it.
Yet the science says otherwise if you look at early versus late treatment of COVID, which only makes sense. The fire department saves houses if they arrive when there is a small kitchen fire, not when the entire house is ablaze.
100 percent of these studies report positive effects for early treatment, meaning those not yet in the hospital and certainly not on a ventilator. Yet the medical establishment and media choose only to focus on advanced disease where hydroxy offers little if any benefit.
Read: CA Doctor Has 100% Cure Rate For Over 1700 COVID Patients Using Hydroxychloroquine
Researchers: 100% Covid-19 Cure Rate Using Intravenous Chlorine Dioxide
If Barack Obama were president and touted hydroxy as a potential therapeutic, as Trump did, Obama would be lauded and likely awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine.
But Trump hatred is so strong that so-called scientists draw a conclusion first, then focus only on data to support their conclusion, pretending any inconvenient contradictory doesn’t exist.
Are these are the people we want to entrust with America’s healthcare system? Making life and death decision for hundreds of millions of Americans? Think of Medicare-for-all under a Biden/Harris regime.
There is also Wu-Flu testing, with no distinction between cases and positive tests, skewing results, creating panic, closing businesses and schools, and ruining the US economy.
Such a distinction would be inconvenient to the shut-it-all-down crowd who are only interested in “surges” and further mandates from totalitarian wannabe governors.
For more detail on cases versus tests, please read my summary of this COVID-con. Other have reached the same conclusion. A legal ruling in Portugal found that the COVID PCR test is “not fit for purpose” meaning mass testing.
They determined that overly high amplification cycles lead to excessive false positives and unreasonable quarantines and business closures.
The judges determined that a positive Chinese coronavirus test has only a 3 percent chance of actually being positive.
Anthony Fauci has acknowledged this publicly when he stated that the COVID-19 test has a “fatal flaw.”
The media chooses to ignore this court case because the ruling is inconvenient to their narrative.
Compare how they lionize a Swedish teenager who says humans are warming and destroying the Earth but refuse to acknowledge Portuguese judges and their opinions.
All science is equal, but some science is more equal than others, to paraphrase George Orwell.
Death counts are reported no differently than COVID cases. Are all reported Wuhan flu deaths due to the virus or did these individuals just happen to test positive before or after death?
George Floyd tested positive for COVID and is likely included in CNN’s touted death count.
How many who die in hospice due to a terminal illness are labeled as COVID deaths? Is this good science or suppression of inconvenient data?
Johns Hopkins University actually took a stab at the science of Chinese virus deaths before they decided their results were inconvenient and buried them.
Hopkins researchers noted that the number of people who died last year is the same as this year. How could that be if hundreds of thousands are dying of the Wuhan flu? It turns out that increases in COVID deaths are offset by decreases in deaths due to heart disease and other ailments.
Has heart disease miraculously disappeared this year? Or are heart attacks being called COVID deaths?
Perhaps the same people counting deaths have been counting votes in Philadelphia and Detroit, simply shifting enough votes from Trump to Biden to keep the totals the same but presenting a different and more convenient result.
The scientists want clinical trials. Where are the trials on masks, social distancing, quarantining the healthy, closing the economy? There are none.
When a study is actually performed, as in the Danish mask study, the results are deemed inconvenient and buried by the scientist and corporate media.
If science were serious, as it should be, coronavirus data should be reviewed, analyzed, and presented objectively. Instead, we are seeing the opposite, where any results inconvenient to a largely political agenda are deemed inconvenient and hidden or deleted.
Those presenting inconvenient results are castigated, maligned, and threatened by the ruling class for daring to challenge the orthodoxy.
Once upon a time, other inconvenient science, like the earth being round and revolving around the sun, were treated the same way as today’s anti-establishment COVID views.
All thanks to the “progressive” party inhabiting academia, entertainment, finance, media, sports, and much of Washington, DC, progressing not forward, but backward to the days of witchcraft and magic.
Depending on how the 2020 election ultimately turns out, evidence-based science may go the way of the dodo bird.
By Brian C Joondeph, MD — a Denver based physician and freelance writer for American Thinker, Rasmussen Reports, and other publications.


humansarefree--2020-12-04--Bill Gates Is Probably The Most Dangerous ‘Philanthropist’ in Modern History

While philanthropy is considered noble , some philanthropists appear to be doing far more harm than good with their donated millions .
Bill Gates , who cofounded Microsoft in 1975 , is perhaps one of the most dangerous philanthropists in modern history , having poured billions of dollars into global health initiatives that stand on shaky scientific and moral ground .
Gates ’ answers to the problems of the world are consistently focused on building corporate profits through highly toxic methods , be it chemical agriculture and GMOs , or pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines.1 Rarely , if ever , do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ inexpensive holistic health strategies .
A March 17 , 2020 , article2 in The Nation titled , “ Bill Gates ’ Charity Paradox , ” details “ the moral hazards surrounding the Gates Foundation ’ s $ 50 billion charitable enterprise , whose sprawling activities over the last two decades have been subject to remarkably little government oversight or public scrutiny.
” As noted in this article , Gates discovered an easy way to gain political power — “ one that allows unelected billionaires to shape public policy ” — namely charity .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ catalytic philanthropy , ” one in which the “ tools of capitalism ” are leveraged to benefit the poor .
The only problem is that the true beneficiaries of Gates ’ philanthropic endeavors tend to be those who are already rich beyond comprehension , including Gates ’ own charitable foundation .
The poor , on the other hand , end up with costly solutions like patented GMO seeds and vaccines that in some instances have done far more harm than good .
( For a few examples , see the following references.3,4,5 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ than 19,000 charitable grants the Gates Foundation has made over the last two decades , The Nation has uncovered close to $ 2 billion in tax-deductible charitable donations to private companies … which are tasked with developing new drugs , improving sanitation in the developing world , developing financial products for Muslim consumers , and spreading the good news about this work .
The Gates Foundation even gave $ 2 million to Participant Media to promote Davis Guggenheim ’ s previous documentary film ‘ Waiting for Superman , ’ which pushes one of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , charter schools — privately managed public schools .
This charitable donation is a small part of the $ 250 million the foundation has given to media companies and other groups to influence the news .
‘ It ’ s been a quite unprecedented development , the amount that the Gates Foundation is gifting to corporations … I find that flabbergasting , frankly , ’ says Linsey McGoey , a professor of sociology at the University of Essex and author of the book ‘ No Such Thing as a Free Gift : The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ ‘ They ’ ve created one of the most problematic precedents in the history of foundation giving by essentially opening the door for corporations to see themselves as deserving charity claimants at a time when corporate profits are at an all-time high . '
” Companies that have received large donations from the Gates Foundation include GlaxoSmithKline , Unilever , IBM , Vodafone , Scholastic Inc. and NBC Universal Media.7,8 Those Calling the Shots Stand to Gain the Most In the video above , Spiro Skouras reviews how the global COVID-19 pandemic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ liberty away from us , and the role Gates is playing in the process .
“ We have been encouraged to sacrifice our liberty for a false sense of security , being conditioned more and more each day to rely on the state for protection and now many of us find ourselves relying on the state to pay our bills , ” Skouras says.9 “ Some are beginning to see that there may be more to the official story than what we are led to believe .
The very few may have seen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ next phase of what very well could be another step closer to global governance .
The exact same individuals and government agencies , in addition to global institutions who stand to benefit the most , are the ones calling the shots.
” Gates , surely , fits the description of someone who is both calling the shots and stands to gain handsomely from the COVID-19 pandemic .
How ?
First , by investing in the same industries he ’ s giving charitable donations to and , second , by promoting a global public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s invested in and supports .
How Gates ’ Foundation Benefits From Its Own Donations For example , in 2014 , a Mastercard affiliate , MasterCard Labs for Financial Inclusion , received a $ 19 million donation10,11 “ to ‘ increase usage of digital financial products by poor adults ’ in Kenya.
” “ The credit card giant had already articulated its keen business interest in cultivating new clients from the developing world ’ s 2.5 billion unbanked people , McGoey says , so why did it need a wealthy philanthropist to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bill and Melinda Gates getting a tax break for this donation ?
” Indeed , those are sensible questions that need serious review .
The Mastercard donation also appears to have benefited the Gates Foundation , making an investigation into Gates ’ “ philanthropy ” all the more necessary .
As explained by The Nation , at the time of that donation , the Gates Foundation had “ substantial financial investments in Mastercard through its holdings in Warren Buffett ’ s investment company , Berkshire Hathaway.
” That ’ s not the only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ found “ close to $ 250 million in charitable grants from the Gates Foundation to companies in which the foundation holds corporate stocks and bonds.
” In other words , the Gates Foundation is giving money to companies that it owns stocks in and will benefit financially from .
As a result , the Foundation and Gates himself continue to increase their wealth .
Part of this growth in wealth also appears to be due to the tax breaks given for charitable donations .
In short , it ’ s a perfect money-shuffling @ @ @ @ @ @ @ generation .
Companies that have received donations that in turn made money for the Gates Foundation include Merck , Novartis , GlaxoSmithKline , Vodafone , Sanofi , Ericsson , LG , Medtronic , Teva and “ numerous startups.
” “ A foundation giving a charitable grant to a company that it partly owns — and stands to benefit from financially — would seem like an obvious conflict of interest … Tax scholars like Ray Madoff , a law professor at Boston College , indicate that multibillionaires see tax savings of at least 40 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , would amount to $ 14 billion … Madoff , like many tax experts , stresses that these billions of dollars in tax savings have to be seen as a public subsidy — money that otherwise would have gone to the U.S. Treasury to help build bridges , do medical research , or close the funding gap at the IRS … If Bill and Melinda Gates don ’ t pay their full freight in taxes , the public has to make up the difference or simply live in a world where governments do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and researching ) and superrich philanthropists do more and more .
‘ I think people often confuse what wealthy people are doing on their own dime and what [ they ’ re ] doing on our dime , and that ’ s one of the big problems about this debate , ’ Madoff notes .
‘ People say , ‘ It ’ s the rich person ’ s money [ to spend as they wish ] .
’ But when they get significant tax benefits , it ’ s also our money @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we need to have rules about how they spend our money . '
” If donating to for-profit companies sounds oddly illegal to you , you ’ d be right .
Gates is a tax evader for doing so — he ’ s simply getting away with it .
The nonprofit foundation is a disguise to avoid taxes while funding the research arms of for-profit organizations that his foundation is invested in .
In reality , Bill and Melinda Gates should be given federal prison sentences , and while not directly spelled out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the point of The Nation ’ s article .
Using nonprofit money to advance research for companies you ’ re invested in is illegal .
If you are as repulsed by the fact that Gates is getting away with this illegal behavior as much as I am , then I encourage you to contact the IRS Whistleblower Office and ask them to investigate Gates ’ tax evasion .
You can also file a consumer complaint with the Washington State Attorney General ’ s office .
That Gates philanthropic endeavors protect his own investments @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stance .
James Love , director of the nonprofit Knowledge Ecology International pointed out to The Nation that Gates:13 “ … uses his philanthropy to advance a pro-patent agenda on pharmaceutical drugs , even in countries that are really poor … He ’ s undermining a lot of things that are really necessary to make drugs affordable … He gives so much money to [ fight ] poverty , and yet he ’ s the biggest obstacle on a lot of reforms.
” Gates is a staunch and longtime defender of the drug @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the pharmaceutical agenda can clearly be seen in the current COVID-19 pandemic .
As reported by Forbes,14 The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has committed $ 100 million to fight the global COVID-19 outbreak .
As much as $ 20 million will reportedly go to agencies such as the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization to be used for front-line detection , containment and treatment efforts .
Another $ 20 million is earmarked for at-risk populations in Africa and South Asia while the remaining $ 60 million @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , diagnostics and other treatments .
Vaccines are clearly one of Gates ’ mainstay “ solutions ” to most diseases .
Gates has gone on record saying the U.S. needs disease surveillance and a national tracking system15 that could involve vaccine records embedded on our bodies ( such as invisible ink quantum dot tattoos described in a Science Translational Medicine paper .
16,17 An Enzyme Called LUCIFERASE Is What Makes Bill Gates Implantable Vaccine Work .
In fact , he ’ s stated that life will not go back to normal until we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ global population against COVID-19 .
Dr. Anthony Fauci , director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ( NIAID ) , has echoed this exact sentiment as well , as if they ’ re reading the same cue card .
It would not surprise me if they were , seeing how the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation collaborates with both the NIAID and WHO “ to increase coordination across the international vaccine community and create a Global Vaccine Action Plan.
” 18 Fauci is on Gate ’ s Leadership Council board @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , as is WHO ’ s former director general Dr. Margaret Chan .
“ The Global Vaccine Action Plan will enable greater coordination across all stakeholder groups — national governments , multilateral organizations , civil society , the private sector and philanthropic organizations — and will identify critical policy , resource , and other gaps that must be addressed to realize the life-saving potential of vaccines.
” Gates influence over global health policies has been criticized for years , yet nothing has been done to limit it .
If anything , his power @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his corporate interests may undermine public health policy now appears to have come true .
As reported by Politico in 2017:19 “ Some billionaires are satisfied with buying themselves an island .
Bill Gates got a United Nations health agency in Geneva .
Over the past decade , the world ’ s richest man has become the World Health Organization ’ s second biggest donor , second only to the United States and just above the United Kingdom … The Gates Foundation has pumped more than $ 2.4 billion into the WHO since @ @ @ @ @ @ @ influence over its agenda … The result , say his critics , is that Gates ’ priorities have become the WHO ’ s … Some health advocates fear that because the Gates Foundation ’ s money comes from investments in big business , it could serve as a Trojan horse for corporate interests to undermine WHO ’ s role in setting standards and shaping health policies.
” According to statements made by Gates , societal and financial normalcy may never return to those who refuse vaccination , as the digital vaccination certificate Gates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to go about your day-to-day life and business .
An April 4 , 2020 , article by OffGuardian comments on Gates ’ March 24 , 2020 , interview with Chris Anderson , the curator of TED ( which runs TED Talks ) above:20 “ Shockingly , Gates … suggests people be made to have a digital ID showing their vaccination status , and that people without this ‘ digital immunity proof ’ would not be allowed to travel .
Such an approach would mean very big money for vaccine producers.
” Again , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of money from any given pandemic , and the Gates Foundation is both funding and making investment profits from vaccine makers .
Is it any wonder then that Gates is trying to indoctrinate people into thinking there are no other answers ?
When asked by Anderson about the economic ramifications of the COVID-19 pandemic , Gates says : “ It is really tragic that the economic effects of this are very dramatic … But … bringing the economy back … that ’ s more of a reversible thing than bringing people back to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ re going to take the pain in the economic dimension , huge pain , in order to minimize the pain in disease and death dimension.
” “ … goes directly against the imperative to balance the benefits and costs of the screening , testing and treatment measures for each ailment — as successfully promulgated for years by , for example , the Choosing Wisely campaign — to provide the maximum benefit to individual patients and society as a whole .
“ Even more importantly … there may be dramatically more deaths from the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Millions could potentially die from suicide , drug abuse , lack of medical coverage or treatment , poverty and lack of food access , on top of other predictable social , medical and public-health problems stemming from the response to COVID-19.
” At 33:45 in the interview , Gates goes on to reveal what appears to be a stunning insider ’ s insight into the current economic shutdown : “ We don ’ t want to have a lot of recovered people … To be clear , we ’ re trying — @ @ @ @ @ @ @ — to not get to 1 % of the population infected … I believe we will be able to avoid that with having this economic pain.
” In other words , if we are to believe Gates , we ’ re sacrificing the financial stability and sanity of hundreds of millions of Americans in order to prevent the infection rate from hitting 1 % of the population .
Keep in mind , the death rate for COVID-19 now appears to be on par with seasonal influenza , according to Fauci,22 so the vast @ @ @ @ @ @ @ after mild illness , and have antibodies that should provide them with long-lasting immunity .
Clearly , if you want to make money from a vaccine , you don ’ t want people to develop immunity naturally , and this is precisely what Gates is admitting to .
“ Gates and his colleagues far prefer to create a vast , hugely expensive , new system of manufacturing and selling billions of test kits , and in parallel very quickly developing and selling billions of antivirals and vaccines .
And then , when the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ later and most of the population is unexposed and therefore vulnerable , selling billions more test kits and medical interventions.
” The short video above summarizes some of the points I ’ ve touched on in this article so far and reviews how the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation influences public health policy at the very highest levels through a vast web of personal and organizational interconnections .
Gates has a history of “ predicting ” global pandemics with vast numbers of deaths,24 and with his call for a tracking system to keep @ @ @ @ @ @ @ individuals , he ’ s ensuring an unimaginably profitable future for the vaccine makers he supports and makes money from via his Foundation investments .
In an April 9 , 2020 , Children ’ s Health Defense article,25 Robert F. Kennedy Jr. further details Gates ’ vaccine agenda .
As noted by Kennedy : “ Vaccines , for Bill Gates , are a strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related businesses ( including Microsoft ’ s ambition to control a global vaccination ID enterprise26 ) and give him dictatorial control of global health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mentions refers to a program called ID2020 , launched in 2019 , which is designed to “ leverage immunization as an opportunity to establish digital identity.
” 27 This digital identity system is said to carry “ far-reaching implications for individuals ’ access to services and livelihoods , ” so to think that Gates ’ call for implantable COVID-19 vaccine certificates would be limited to that alone would likely be a grave mistake .
It ’ s not so far-fetched to imagine a future in which your vaccine certificate simply replaces personal identifications @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , state ID card , Social Security card and passport .
Wall Street Journal Wants Us to Pity Gates As people are starting to see the truth , Gates ’ social media accounts have been flooded with criticism , resulting in The Wall Street Journal publishing an article28 trying to raise pity for him , saying he ’ s being attacked by “ social media mobs.
” April 17 , 2020 , Zero Hedge commented on the PR campaign to protect Gates:29 “ The Wall Street Journal ’ s Deepa Seetharaman wants us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Gates has ‘ long been a target for online trolls ’ … ‘ the social-media attacks have intensified ’ as the Micrrosoft co-founder and World Health Organization ( WHO ) benefactor has become the left ’ s de-facto coronavirus czar … Perhaps the ‘ conspiracy theorists ’ are having a little trouble digesting the fact that Gates — whose vaccine efforts in India were blamed for a devastating non-polio acute flaccid paralysis ( NPAFP ) epidemic that paralyzed 490,000 children — coincidentally hosted an October , 2019 high-level ‘ pandemic simulation ’ in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ focused on coronavirus … Combine that with Gates ’ recent comments about mass vaccination and biometric identification in order to ‘ open up ’ the country and allow people to attend mass gatherings — an idea which Dr. Anthony Fauci said ‘ has merit , ’ and so-called conspiracy theorists have plenty of dots to connect .
According to the Journal , ‘ social-media platforms remain fertile ground for virus-related conspiracies and online harassment , despite repeated pledges by the companies to crack down on such activity.
’ So — Gates is being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ criminals with their menacing opinions .
And of course , ‘ bots ’ are also being blamed for amplifying ‘ conspiracy claims ’ — since there can ’ t be that many real humans with bad things to say about Mr. Gates.
” Far from being a force for good , Gates appears to have chosen to use his wealth and intellect to further a distasteful social control plan to benefit his own nefarious agendas , and people all over the world are finally starting to see his true colors .
By Dr. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fuel : A Revolutionary Diet to Combat Cancer , Boost Brain Power , and Increase Your Energy

Forty thousand gather in Berlin to protest tyrannical, economy-destroying coronavirus restrictions. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. spoke to an enormous crowd of “plandemic” protestors in Berlin on Saturday.
In his speech, Kennedy mentioned a million protestors (he may have been referring to the global total, who were gathered in at least 25 cities around the world. The BBC reported 38,000 in Berlin.
The crowd took over the streets signs reading “masks are muzzles,” “stop corona-madness” and “new normal = new fascism.”
Kennedy said that “the corrupt American mainstream media” were telling people he came to Berlin “to speak to about five thousand Nazis.”
“But I look at this crowd and I see the opposite of Nazism. I see people of democracy. People who want open government … We want health officials who don’t have financial entanglements with the pharmaceutical industry, who are working for us, not Big Pharma.”
“We found out when we started fighting the pharmaceutical companies that they had a lot of people on their team. They had the Telecom companies, who were trying to put in 5g. They had Google on their side – and Google is a jjab company. Google makes jjabs – it makes flu jjabs and Covid jjabs.
“We were wondering why is Google censoring us? Why won’t Google let us put any truth about the pharmaceutical industry. Facebook began censoring us. Instagram. Vimeo. Youtube.”
“These are all international companies. They want to use this pandemic to inspire us with fear so we will accept control and obedience. For 15 years, I have not been able to go on television in the United States. The TV stations won’t let me, because their revenues come from the pharmaceutical companies.
“Out of 22 ads during the evening news station, 17 are paid for by pharma. Anderson Cooper works for Merck… All of the news anchors that call themselves journalists are actually pharmaceutical reps.”
Reference: Returntonow.net


humansarefree--2020-12-04--Asymptomatic People Do NOT Spread COVID-19 (PCR Tests Inflate Cases, But Deaths Stay the SAME)

According to media reports , COVID-19 “ cases , ” meaning positive PCR test results , are soaring across the U.S. and around the world , leading to the implementation of measures that in some cases are stricter than what we endured during the initial wave .
However , as detailed in several recent articles , including “ Why COVID-19 Testing Is a Tragic Waste , ” PCR tests are being used incorrectly , resulting in the false appearance of widespread transmission .
In reality , the vast majority of people who end up with a positive test will not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Needless to say , if you ’ re not infectious , you pose no health risk to anyone , and being placed under what amounts to house arrest is nothing but cruel and unusual punishment for no reason whatsoever .
Positive Test Rates Have No Bearing on Mortality Rates In The Highwire report above , Del Bigtree breaks down how excessively high test sensitivity leads to falsely elevated “ case ” numbers that in reality tell us nothing about the situation at hand .
As noted by Bigtree , what ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ actual death rate .
“ If COVID is a deadly virus , what should we see when cases increase ?
” he asks .
The answer , of course , is an increase in deaths .
However , that ’ s not what ’ s happening .
Aside from a small bump at the beginning , when doctors were unsure of the appropriate treatment and some states recklessly and irresponsibly sent infected patients into ill equipped nursing homes , the death rate has remained relatively flat while positive test rates have dramatically risen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ video , Bigtree features a November 4 , 2020 , tweet1 by White House coronavirus adviser Dr. Scott Atlas showing the number of positive tests ( aka “ cases ” ) in blue and COVID-19 related deaths in red , since the start of the pandemic up until the end of October 2020 .
As you can see , there ’ s no correlation between the positive test rate and subsequent deaths .
One of the explanations for why positive test rates and mortality do not go hand in hand is the simple @ @ @ @ @ @ @ testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 are asymptomatic .
They simply aren ’ t sick .
The PCR test is merely picking up inactive ( noninfectious ) viral particles .
In one study,2 which looked at pregnant women admitted for delivery , 87.9 % of the women who tested positive for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 had no symptoms .
Another study3 looked at a large homeless shelter in Boston .
After a cluster of COVID-19 cases was observed there , researchers conducted symptoms assessments and testing among all guests residing at the shelter over a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , 147 , or 36 % , were positive , yet symptoms were conspicuously absent .
Cough occurred in only 7.5 % of cases , shortness of breath in 1.4 % and fever in 0.7 % .
All symptoms were “ uncommon among COVID-positive individuals , ” the researchers noted .
During a June 8 , 2020 , press briefing , Maria Van Kerkhove , the World Health Organization ’ s technical lead for the COVID-19 pandemic , made it very clear that asymptomatic transmission is very rare , meaning an individual who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is highly unlikely to transmit live virus to others .
“ We have a number of reports from countries who are doing very detailed contact tracing .
They ’ re following asymptomatic cases , they ’ re following contacts , and they ’ re not finding secondary transmission … it ’ s very rare , and much of that is not published in the literature , ” Van Kerkhove said .
Just one day later , Dr. Mike Ryan , executive director of the WHO ’ s emergencies program , backpedaled Van Kerkhove @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were “ misinterpreted.
” 4 Needless to say , when you ’ re trying to justify the implementation of a vast surveillance network , it ’ s no good to admit a vast majority of people are having their privacy infringed upon for no good reason whatsoever .
Asymptomatic People Pose No Risk to Others Most recently , a study5 in Nature Communications assessed the risk posed by asymptomatic people by looking at the data from a mass screening program in Wuhan , China .
The city had been under strict lockdown between @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Between May 14 and June 1 , 2020 , 9,899,828 residents of Wuhan city over the age of 6 underwent PCR testing .
In all , 92.9 % of the entire city population participated in the testing .
Of these , 9,865,404 had no previous diagnosis of COVID-19 and 34,424 were recovered COVID-19 patients .
In all , there were zero symptomatic cases and only 300 asymptomatic cases detected .
( The overall detection rate was 0.3 per 10,000 . )
Importantly , not a single one of the 1,174 people who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ asymptomatic individual tested positive .
Additionally , of the 34,424 participants with a history of COVID-19 , 107 individuals ( 0.310 % ) tested positive again , but none were symptomatic .
As noted by the authors:6 “ Virus cultures were negative for all asymptomatic positive and repositive cases , indicating no ‘ viable virus ’ in positive cases detected in this study … The 300 asymptomatic positive persons aged from 10 to 89 years … “ The asymptomatic positive rate was the lowest in children or adolescents aged 17 and below ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the elderly aged 60 years and above ( 0.442/10,000 ) .
The asymptomatic positive rate in females ( 0.355/10,000 ) was higher than that in males ( 0.256/10,000 ) .
” Interestingly , when they further tested asymptomatic patients for antibodies , they discovered that 190 of the 300 , or 63.3 % , had actually had a “ hot ” or productive infection resulting in the production of antibodies .
Still , none of their contacts had been infected .
In other words , even though asymptomatics were ( or had been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they still did not transmit it to others .
As noted by the authors , “ there was no evidence of transmission from asymptomatic positive persons to traced close contacts.
” “ Compared with symptomatic patients , asymptomatic infected persons generally have low quantity of viral loads and a short duration of viral shedding , which decrease the transmission risk of SARS-CoV-2 .
“ In the present study , virus culture was carried out on samples from asymptomatic positive cases , and found no viable SARS-CoV-2 virus .
All close contacts of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the asymptomatic positive cases detected in this study were unlikely to be infectious.
” Reinfected Individuals Are Not Infectious Either The same held true for people who tested positive a second time after having recovered from an active infection .
“ Results of virus culturing and contract [ sic ] tracing found no evidence that repositive cases in recovered COVID-19 patients were infectious , which is consistent with evidence from other sources , ” the authors said.8 The researchers also pointed out that virus cultures and genetic studies have shown the virulence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time , and that newly infected individuals are more likely to be asymptomatic and have a lower viral load than the cases seen earlier in the outbreak .
What does all of this tell us ?
It tells us there ’ s no reason to panic simply because the number of positive tests are on the rise .
Remember , the more people you test using a PCR test that is set to an excessive cycle threshold , the more false positives you ’ ll get .
As explained in “ Asymptomatic ‘ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fear , ” by using an excessive cycle threshold that amplifies the viral RNA to the point that it detects inactive ( noninfectious ) particles is at the heart of this so-called pandemic .
It ’ s what keeps the pandemic narrative going , when in fact it ’ s long since over .
Interestingly , the same day the China study came out , the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention updated its guidance9,10 on mask wearing , claiming asymptomatic people account for more than half of all transmissions .
Where @ @ @ @ @ @ @ two references listed as support for that claim include a study11 from July 2020 , and CDC data that haven ’ t even been published yet.12 It just says it was “ submitted ” for publication sometime in 2020 , therefore , we are unable to provide any source link .
The CDC makes no mention of the China study , which included nearly 10 million individuals .
CNN , which reported the CDC ’ s update , parroting the idea that asymptomatic spread is why it ’ s so important to wear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the landmark study from China .
Curious , don ’ t you think ?
It ’ s almost as though the CDC doesn ’ t want us to know we have nothing to fear from healthy people .
Many doctors , scientists and lawyers have now become wise to the fact that it is these flawed tests , and their fraudulent use , that is keeping the fear narrative alive — and they ’ re taking action .
In the video above , Ben Swann talks to Dr. Reiner Fuellmich,13 a consumer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee ( Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss15 ) ,16,17 which is seeking to expose how fraudulent testing has been and continues to be used to engineer the appearance of a dangerous pandemic when in fact there is none .
The committee is now filing the first of many lawsuits to come , this one against so-called fact checkers on social media .
They opted to file a defamation lawsuit on behalf of Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg , a former member of the German Congress and the Council of Europe who has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , as it can not be used to diagnose infection .
Social media companies have labeled Wodarg ’ s statements as “ false , ” and by filing a defamation suit , the burden of proof now falls on the fact checkers to prove that they are correct .
In other words , to win , the fact checkers must prove that PCR tests diagnose active infection .
The scientific evidence proves they don ’ t , so this case could turn out to be pivotal in the fight against the big tech @ @ @ @ @ @ @ While Fuellmich and his team make no claims about WHY the pandemic is being kept alive using fraudulent science , they are unequivocal in their assertion that it is in fact a fake pandemic and that it has had devastating health and economic consequences around the world .
For the why , we have to turn to the geopolitical scene to see what narratives have rolled out in tandem with the pandemic .
What we find is that leaders across the world are now calling for a “ reset ” of the global @ @ @ @ @ @ @ brought by the pandemic .
In reality , of course , it is the global response to the pandemic that created the economic devastation , not the virus itself .
Either way , the call to “ build back better ” is being heard around the world , and such plans include the elimination of conventional capitalism , free enterprise and private ownership , replacing them with a technocratic resource-based economic system in which energy and social engineering run the economy rather than pricing mechanisms such as supply and demand .
Leaders are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and there appear to be plans in place to use biometric surveillance via vaccines , all of which feed into the technocratic system in which this kind of mass surveillance is not only paramount but also foundational .
The reason surveillance is so crucial is because the functioning of this system hinges on artificial intelligence-driven social engineering and manipulation of the masses .
Unless people are locked into what could be described as a digital prison , they won ’ t comply with what ’ s coming .
Hook everyone up to a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ID and a social credit score , however , and few will have the fortitude to object or speak out against the unelected rulers .
Your entire life could easily be upended with the push of a button .
We ’ ve already seen how many people have not only been deplatformed for speaking out against one thing or another this past year , they ’ ve also had their digital payment accounts closed down , effectively destroying their ability to earn a living .
Imagine if there were nothing but a centralized @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shut down .
How would you live ?
No person in their right mind would agree to this Great Reset plan if they were aware of all the details and its ultimate implications for humanity as a whole .
So , to roll it out , they had to use psychological manipulation , and fear is the most effective tool there is .
As explained by psychiatrist Dr. Peter Breggin , there ’ s an entire school of public health research that focuses on identifying the most effective ways to frighten people into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ adding confusion and uncertainty to the mix , you can bring an individual from fear to anxiety — a state of confusion in which you can no longer think logically — and in this state , you are more easily manipulated .
The following graphic illustrates the central role of fearmongering for the successful rollout of the Great Reset .
In closing , testing asymptomatic people and isolating people who test positive even when they have no symptoms is a key strategy that keeps the fear level high .
There simply aren ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the ruse going , and far too few actually die to make the narrative work .
That ’ s why we hear nothing about those statistics anymore .
Instead , all we hear about are the “ cases ” — the positive tests which have no bearing on mortality rates .
Fear of asymptomatics also drive the narrative that we must all wear face masks everywhere we go , because you don ’ t know who might be infected and not know it .
It instills fear of others , as even seemingly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The featured study from Wuhan demonstrates the fallacy of such fears .
People who test positive but have no symptoms are not infectious and pose no risk to others .
They don ’ t need to wear masks and they don ’ t need to be isolated .
In short , we don ’ t need to fear each other .
By Dr. Joseph Mercola , author of Fat for Fuel : A Revolutionary Diet to Combat Cancer , Boost Brain Power , and Increase Your Energy

According to media reports, COVID-19 “cases,” meaning positive PCR test results, are soaring across the U.S. and around the world, leading to the implementation of measures that in some cases are stricter than what we endured during the initial wave.
However, as detailed in several recent articles, including “Why COVID-19 Testing Is a Tragic Waste,” PCR tests are being used incorrectly, resulting in the false appearance of widespread transmission.
In reality, the vast majority of people who end up with a positive test will not develop symptoms and aren’t infectious.
Needless to say, if you’re not infectious, you pose no health risk to anyone, and being placed under what amounts to house arrest is nothing but cruel and unusual punishment for no reason whatsoever.
Positive Test Rates Have No Bearing on Mortality Rates

In The Highwire report above, Del Bigtree breaks down how excessively high test sensitivity leads to falsely elevated “case” numbers that in reality tell us nothing about the situation at hand.
As noted by Bigtree, what’s missing from the COVID-19 conversation is the actual death rate.
“If COVID is a deadly virus, what should we see when cases increase?” he asks. The answer, of course, is an increase in deaths. However, that’s not what’s happening.
Aside from a small bump at the beginning, when doctors were unsure of the appropriate treatment and some states recklessly and irresponsibly sent infected patients into ill equipped nursing homes, the death rate has remained relatively flat while positive test rates have dramatically risen and fallen in intervals.
In the video, Bigtree features a November 4, 2020, tweet1 by White House coronavirus adviser Dr. Scott Atlas showing the number of positive tests (aka “cases”) in blue and COVID-19 related deaths in red, since the start of the pandemic up until the end of October 2020.
As you can see, there’s no correlation between the positive test rate and subsequent deaths.
Bombshell: Fauci States COVID Test Has Fatal Flaw
Vast Majority of ‘COVID-19 Patients’ Are Asymptomatic
One of the explanations for why positive test rates and mortality do not go hand in hand is the simple fact that a vast majority of those testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 are asymptomatic.
They simply aren’t sick. The PCR test is merely picking up inactive (noninfectious) viral particles.
In one study,2 which looked at pregnant women admitted for delivery, 87.9% of the women who tested positive for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 had no symptoms.
Another study3 looked at a large homeless shelter in Boston. After a cluster of COVID-19 cases was observed there, researchers conducted symptoms assessments and testing among all guests residing at the shelter over a two-day period.
Of 408 people tested, 147, or 36%, were positive, yet symptoms were conspicuously absent. Cough occurred in only 7.5% of cases, shortness of breath in 1.4% and fever in 0.7%.
All symptoms were “uncommon among COVID-positive individuals,” the researchers noted.
Asymptomatic Transmission Is Very Rare
During a June 8, 2020, press briefing, Maria Van Kerkhove, the World Health Organization’s technical lead for the COVID-19 pandemic, made it very clear that asymptomatic transmission is very rare, meaning an individual who tests positive but does not exhibit symptoms is highly unlikely to transmit live virus to others.
“We have a number of reports from countries who are doing very detailed contact tracing. They’re following asymptomatic cases, they’re following contacts, and they’re not finding secondary transmission … it’s very rare, and much of that is not published in the literature,” Van Kerkhove said.
Just one day later, Dr. Mike Ryan, executive director of the WHO’s emergencies program, backpedaled Van Kerkhove’s statement, saying the remarks were “misinterpreted.”4
Needless to say, when you’re trying to justify the implementation of a vast surveillance network, it’s no good to admit a vast majority of people are having their privacy infringed upon for no good reason whatsoever.
Asymptomatic People Pose No Risk to Others
Most recently, a study5 in Nature Communications assessed the risk posed by asymptomatic people by looking at the data from a mass screening program in Wuhan, China.
The city had been under strict lockdown between January 23 and April 8, 2020. Between May 14 and June 1, 2020, 9,899,828 residents of Wuhan city over the age of 6 underwent PCR testing.
In all, 92.9% of the entire city population participated in the testing. Of these, 9,865,404 had no previous diagnosis of COVID-19 and 34,424 were recovered COVID-19 patients.
In all, there were zero symptomatic cases and only 300 asymptomatic cases detected. (The overall detection rate was 0.3 per 10,000.)
Importantly, not a single one of the 1,174 people who had been in close contact with an asymptomatic individual tested positive.
Additionally, of the 34,424 participants with a history of COVID-19, 107 individuals (0.310%) tested positive again, but none were symptomatic. As noted by the authors:6
“Virus cultures were negative for all asymptomatic positive and repositive cases, indicating no ‘viable virus’ in positive cases detected in this study … The 300 asymptomatic positive persons aged from 10 to 89 years …
“The asymptomatic positive rate was the lowest in children or adolescents aged 17 and below (0.124/10,000), and the highest among the elderly aged 60 years and above (0.442/10,000). The asymptomatic positive rate in females (0.355/10,000) was higher than that in males (0.256/10,000).”
Asymptomatic People Have Low Viral Load
Interestingly, when they further tested asymptomatic patients for antibodies, they discovered that 190 of the 300, or 63.3%, had actually had a “hot” or productive infection resulting in the production of antibodies.
Still, none of their contacts had been infected.
In other words, even though asymptomatics were (or had been) carriers of apparently live virus, they still did not transmit it to others.
As noted by the authors, “there was no evidence of transmission from asymptomatic positive persons to traced close contacts.”
They further added:7
“Compared with symptomatic patients, asymptomatic infected persons generally have low quantity of viral loads and a short duration of viral shedding, which decrease the transmission risk of SARS-CoV-2.
“In the present study, virus culture was carried out on samples from asymptomatic positive cases, and found no viable SARS-CoV-2 virus. All close contacts of the asymptomatic positive cases tested negative, indicating that the asymptomatic positive cases detected in this study were unlikely to be infectious.”
Reinfected Individuals Are Not Infectious Either
The same held true for people who tested positive a second time after having recovered from an active infection.
“Results of virus culturing and contract [sic] tracing found no evidence that repositive cases in recovered COVID-19 patients were infectious, which is consistent with evidence from other sources,” the authors said.8
The researchers also pointed out that virus cultures and genetic studies have shown the virulence of SARS-CoV-2 appears to be weakening over time, and that newly infected individuals are more likely to be asymptomatic and have a lower viral load than the cases seen earlier in the outbreak.
What does all of this tell us? It tells us there’s no reason to panic simply because the number of positive tests are on the rise.
Remember, the more people you test using a PCR test that is set to an excessive cycle threshold, the more false positives you’ll get.
As explained in “Asymptomatic ‘Casedemic’ Is a Perpetuation of Needless Fear,” by using an excessive cycle threshold that amplifies the viral RNA to the point that it detects inactive (noninfectious) particles is at the heart of this so-called pandemic.
It’s what keeps the pandemic narrative going, when in fact it’s long since over.
CDC Uses Questionable Sources to Counter China Study
Interestingly, the same day the China study came out, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention updated its guidance9,10 on mask wearing, claiming asymptomatic people account for more than half of all transmissions.
Where did they get that from?
The two references listed as support for that claim include a study11 from July 2020, and CDC data that haven’t even been published yet.12
It just says it was “submitted” for publication sometime in 2020, therefore, we are unable to provide any source link. The CDC makes no mention of the China study, which included nearly 10 million individuals.
CNN, which reported the CDC’s update, parroting the idea that asymptomatic spread is why it’s so important to wear a mask, also made no mention of the landmark study from China.
Curious, don’t you think? It’s almost as though the CDC doesn’t want us to know we have nothing to fear from healthy people.
German Lawyers Sue Fact Checkers Over Censorship
Many doctors, scientists and lawyers have now become wise to the fact that it is these flawed tests, and their fraudulent use, that is keeping the fear narrative alive — and they’re taking action.
In the video above, Ben Swann talks to Dr. Reiner Fuellmich,13 a consumer protection trial lawyer14 and founding member of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss15),16,17 which is seeking to expose how fraudulent testing has been and continues to be used to engineer the appearance of a dangerous pandemic when in fact there is none.
The committee is now filing the first of many lawsuits to come, this one against so-called fact checkers on social media.
They opted to file a defamation lawsuit on behalf of Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a former member of the German Congress and the Council of Europe who has been an outspoken critic of PCR testing, as it cannot be used to diagnose infection.
Social media companies have labeled Wodarg’s statements as “false,” and by filing a defamation suit, the burden of proof now falls on the fact checkers to prove that they are correct.
In other words, to win, the fact checkers must prove that PCR tests diagnose active infection. The scientific evidence proves they don’t, so this case could turn out to be pivotal in the fight against the big tech censorship that keeps the fearmongering alive.
COVID-19 Pandemic — The Greatest Psyop in History?
While Fuellmich and his team make no claims about WHY the pandemic is being kept alive using fraudulent science, they are unequivocal in their assertion that it is in fact a fake pandemic and that it has had devastating health and economic consequences around the world.
For the why, we have to turn to the geopolitical scene to see what narratives have rolled out in tandem with the pandemic.
What we find is that leaders across the world are now calling for a “reset” of the global economy in the wake of the destruction brought by the pandemic.
In reality, of course, it is the global response to the pandemic that created the economic devastation, not the virus itself.
Either way, the call to “build back better” is being heard around the world, and such plans include the elimination of conventional capitalism, free enterprise and private ownership, replacing them with a technocratic resource-based economic system in which energy and social engineering run the economy rather than pricing mechanisms such as supply and demand.
Leaders are also calling for invasive health surveillance, and there appear to be plans in place to use biometric surveillance via jjabs, all of which feed into the technocratic system in which this kind of mass surveillance is not only paramount but also foundational.
The reason surveillance is so crucial is because the functioning of this system hinges on artificial intelligence-driven social engineering and manipulation of the masses.
Unless people are locked into what could be described as a digital prison, they won’t comply with what’s coming.
Hook everyone up to a digital centralized banking system, a digital ID and a social credit score, however, and few will have the fortitude to object or speak out against the unelected rulers.
Your entire life could easily be upended with the push of a button.
We’ve already seen how many people have not only been deplatformed for speaking out against one thing or another this past year, they’ve also had their digital payment accounts closed down, effectively destroying their ability to earn a living.
Imagine if there were nothing but a centralized digital currency system and your accounts got shut down. How would you live?
Fear Is a Highly Effective Manipulation Tool
No person in their right mind would agree to this Great Reset plan if they were aware of all the details and its ultimate implications for humanity as a whole. So, to roll it out, they had to use psychological manipulation, and fear is the most effective tool there is.
As explained by psychiatrist Dr. Peter Breggin, there’s an entire school of public health research that focuses on identifying the most effective ways to frighten people into accepting desired public health measures.
By adding confusion and uncertainty to the mix, you can bring an individual from fear to anxiety — a state of confusion in which you can no longer think logically — and in this state, you are more easily manipulated.
The following graphic illustrates the central role of fearmongering for the successful rollout of the Great Reset.
In closing, testing asymptomatic people and isolating people who test positive even when they have no symptoms is a key strategy that keeps the fear level high.
There simply aren’t enough hospitalized COVID-19 patients to keep the ruse going, and far too few actually die to make the narrative work. That’s why we hear nothing about those statistics anymore.
Instead, all we hear about are the “cases” — the positive tests which have no bearing on mortality rates.
Fear of asymptomatics also drive the narrative that we must all wear face masks everywhere we go, because you don’t know who might be infected and not know it. It instills fear of others, as even seemingly healthy people might make you deathly ill.
The featured study from Wuhan demonstrates the fallacy of such fears. People who test positive but have no symptoms are not infectious and pose no risk to others. They don’t need to wear masks and they don’t need to be isolated.
In short, we don’t need to fear each other.
By Dr. Joseph Mercola, author of Fat for Fuel: A Revolutionary Diet to Combat Cancer, Boost Brain Power, and Increase Your Energy
Sources and References:


humansarefree--2020-12-04--Does THIS Surveillance Video Proves Georgia Election Fraud Beyond Doubt, or Nothing is Ever Going to

Does THIS Surveillance Video Proves Georgia Election Fraud Beyond Doubt, or Nothing is Ever Going to Be Enough?

Georgia ’ s Fulton County , the most populous in the state , claimed it needed to stop absentee ballot overnight on November 3-4 because of a burst pipe .
That was a lie .
There was no burst pipe , and the counting didn ’ t stop .
At a hearing on Thursday , surveillance footage emerged showing that the ballots being secretly counted came from suitcases hidden under a table .
Here ’ s what seems to have happened : In Fulton County , Georgia , the people who planned to add fake ballots to Biden ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ overall good plan .
First , announce that a burst pipe required everybody to vacate the building until morning and , second , count fake votes .
The planners missed two details .
First , they forgot to make sure the government ’ s documents supported the “ burst pipe ” narrative .
Text messages emerged showing that nothing had burst .
Instead , there was a quickly contained slow leak that didn ’ t even generate a work order .
Second , they forgot that the State Farm Arena , where the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all over .
On Wednesday , intrepid volunteers obtained the videos from the surveillance cameras in the room in which the count took place and , by doing so , may have discovered the election fraud smoking gun .
In the video below , at a hearing about election fraud in Georgia on Thursday , a volunteer narrates the video showing surveillance footage of the same room from four different angles : You can see the pivotal images , below , which I ’ ve sharpened slightly and to which I ’ ve @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no other changes .
The first image , taken shortly before 10:00 p.m. , comes from the lower right-hand video monitor .
The red arrow points to the Republican observers in the far corner of a large room .
Not only do they have , at best , an extremely limited view of the tables near them , but they are also nowhere near the tables where the real action was taking place .
The green arrow points in the direction of the pivotal tables , which aren ’ t visible on this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ woman with long blond braids , and wearing black pants and a white shirt , heads to the observers .
She tells the observers that the counting had to stop and that everyone had to leave : Shortly before 11:00 , the observers were gone and the tables seen in the lower right-hand image are cleared : The action shifts to the upper right-hand corner of the video .
At 10:57 , these desks are still piled with paper .
You can see people clustered in the upper right-hand corner , presumably getting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ braids : At 11:00 , everyone gets busy .
A woman with a yellow shirt dragged to her desk a rolling suitcase that she had just retrieved from under the long , black table : Immediately after that , the woman with the blond braids retrieved another suitcase from under the table : And next , a man in the red shirt retrieved a third suitcase from under the table : Someone dragged a fourth suitcase out from under the table , but I was not able to capture the image .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hours , these workers counted the ballots they ’ d retrieved from the suitcases .
The machines can process roughly 3,000 ballots per hour and there were multiple machines at work during those two unsupervised hours .
The narrator explained that she and her team had only discovered the footage the evening before the hearing at which she was testifying .
Therefore , they hadn ’ t yet had a chance to discover when those suitcases were hidden under the table .
As of the time of her testimony , she and her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the suitcases came from , why they were hidden , or why they were being counted after a ruse was used to get legally-mandated observers out of the room .
Rational thinkers , though , can all make a good guess as to what was really going on .
The mainstream media , of course , insist that , because Trump supporters didn ’ t yet have the details behind activity that was sneaky and illegal on its face , that the activity must , therefore , have been innocently sneaky and illegal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this complex seldom work .
There are simply too many moving parts and , therefore , too many opportunities for mistakes .
Forgetting about the surveillance cameras was a mistake and it is to be hoped that every intelligent American who is not a partisan media hack – i.e.
, members of the public , politicians , and judges alike — understands that we ’ re seeing something better than a smoking gun .
In those surveillance videos , we ’ re actually watching in real time the gun being used to commit @ @ @ @ @ @ @

A New Jersey police department has unveiled technology that allows 911 operators to stream video from callers’ smartphones. Sounds like a good idea, at first – but where does the surveillance stop?
Gloucester Township Police’s new 911eye emergency dispatch system lets emergency service operators see video live-streamed from a caller’s phone, giving first responders an idea of what they’re getting into before anyone is sent to the scene.
For now, the caller has to activate the livestream with a link sent by the 911 dispatcher, which allows operators to use the phone’s camera and microphone. But this is the first step down a very slippery slope.
911eye, developed by Capita Secure Solutions and Services in conjunction with West Midlands Fire Service in the UK, represents a step toward frankly terrifying surveillance infrastructure that can turn any internet-capable device into a remote-activated surveillance tool.
West Midlands Police were the first to embrace “pre-crime” technology in the UK, developing the National Data Analytics Solution to sniff out potential offenders and divert them with ostensibly therapeutic “interventions.”
If the fact that it was developed by the people behind the real-life version of ‘Minority Report’ isn’t enough reason to give 911eye a wide berth, take a look at Carbyne911, one of its competitors. Funded by deceased pedophile Jeffrey Epstein through former Israeli PM Ehud Barak, Carbyne911 markets itself as the solution to mass shootings.
The program – founded by current and former Israeli intelligence personnel, which isn’t at all worrisome given that this country spies on the US so extensively it scares Congress – lets emergency dispatchers commandeer the camera and microphone of any internet-capable device within a certain range of the person who made the call.
Investors include Peter Thiel, whose company Palantir has been described as “using war on terror tools to track American citizens,” and its advisory board includes Patriot Act co-author Michael Chertoff, the former Department of Homeland Security chief.
At least two US counties have reportedly adopted Carbyne911, despite obvious privacy issues (and the fact that while most of its employees and personnel have military-intelligence connections, few have a background in emergency services).
Of course, bad actors don’t need an “emergency services” app to turn your phone into a spying device. Israeli spyware manufacturer NSO Group’s Pegasus software has been wielded against human rights campaigners, journalists, and even politicians, according to Amnesty International, which has sued the company for allowing its software to be weaponized against peaceful activists.
And how does Pegasus work? The hacker sends the target a link, and as soon as they click on it, the hacker can use the target’s smartphone camera and microphone as surveillance devices. Which sounds an awful lot like 911eye’s business model – but you can trust them. They’re the police, and they’re here to help.
Source: RT.com