humansarefree--2020-08-01--The Great Reset – Brought to You by Bill & Melinda Gates

Now that Bill Gates and his network have ravaged the livelihoods of the global population ( aside from the crippling health consequences of the toxic vaccines he sponsors and profits from ) and caused , in the form of the “ problem ” , a meltdown of the global economy by unleashing his planned Fake Pandemic , he and his like-minded group of future-makers are ready to offer the “ solution ” .
To those of us researching the cabal , these plans are not anything new and their moves are easy to anticipate as they hide everything in plain @ @ @ @ @ @ @ intended to rise out of the ashes of the Old World Order and the Old World Order has been long planned to be destroyed by a purposefully engineered global economic meltdown .
This is classic Problem-Reaction-Solution .
Problem-Reaction-Solution ( PRS ) ( Latin : Ordo ab Chao – Order out of Chaos ) is a mass mind control system .
It is also called the “ Hegelian Dialectic ” from the German philosopher , Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel .
PRS is used to enforce changes on a citizenry that they would otherwise reject @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a problem such as a fake pandemic or a terrorist attack , followed by the manufacturing of a reaction by leveraging control of mainstream narratives ( broadcast networks or social media ) by only focusing on the side of the problem that you want to control , and then finally offering a solution such as a global economic reset and the implementation of tyrannical control coupled with perpetual surveillance .
What , you may ask , is the solution to the economic meltdown as caused by the fake pandemic ?
This is certainly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the twin summit known as The Great Reset that is to be convened by the World Economic Forum !
Next On The Agenda : The Great Reset Fraud Bill Gates will be intimately involved in dictating the future course of your life because , after all , he is quite the man of influence .

Now that Billy Boy and his network have ravaged the livelihoods of the global population (aside from the crippling health consequences of the toxic jjabs he sponsors and profits from) and caused, in the form of the “problem”, a meltdown of the global economy by unleashing his planned Fake Pandemic, he and his like-minded group of future-makers are ready to offer the “solution”.
To those of us researching the cabal, these plans are not anything new and their moves are easy to anticipate as they hide everything in plain sight.
The New World Order is intended to rise out of the ashes of the Old World Order and the Old World Order has been long planned to be destroyed by a purposefully engineered global economic meltdown. This is classic Problem-Reaction-Solution.
Problem-Reaction-Solution (PRS) (Latin: Ordo ab Chao – Order out of Chaos) is a mass mind control system. It is also called the “Hegelian Dialectic” from the German philosopher, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.
PRS is used to enforce changes on a citizenry that they would otherwise reject. This is accomplished by first creating a problem such as a fake pandemic or a terrorist attack, followed by the manufacturing of a reaction by leveraging control of mainstream narratives (broadcast networks or social media) by only focusing on the side of the problem that you want to control, and then finally offering a solution such as a global economic reset and the implementation of tyrannical control coupled with perpetual surveillance.
What, you may ask, is the solution to the economic meltdown as caused by the fake pandemic? This is certainly what the future-makers intend to discuss at the twin summit known as The Great Reset that is to be convened by the World Economic Forum!
Next On The Agenda: The Great Reset Fraud
Billy Boy will be intimately involved in dictating the future course of your life because, after all, he is quite the man of influence.


humansarefree--2020-08-01--Corporate Controlled Mainstream Media (MSM) Exists to Demoralize the Public

It has become increasingly obvious that the corporate controlled mainstream media exists to demoralize the public by cherry-picking stories that favor a narrative that promotes victimization .
Incidents that are in the minority are amplified and with purposeful repetitive selection to give the impression that the conditions and circumstances surrounding a particular narrative are in the majority .
I have observed the effect that mainstream narratives have on both the collective and individual level , and the ferocious intensity with which people are convinced that the world that they read about has a one-to-one correspondence with a reality that they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
One need not look any further than the ocean of mask wearing individuals walking about in public , convinced that the breath of their neighbor or fellow pedestrian is a weapon of mass destruction .
The media has purposefully promoted the concept that those who do not wear a mask are an existential threat to you and your family .
According to them , you are a victim to their callous behavior ; that ultimately freedom loving people who refuse to wear a mask are a threat to society .
This is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ victimized you will willingly forgo any of your freedoms for a guarantee of safety .
Oh , and for good measure , the media will add that they are probably Trump supporters and thus COVID-19 deniers , a tactic sure to enrage the reader even further and a blatant effort to steer the reader politically .
While the fake pandemic is a great example of the media ’ s role in victimizing its audience , this tactic has been deployed for long before then , primarily for the promotion of a political , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the effort by those at the top to divide and rule over the population .
As the attention span of the average reader has shrunk , the media has focused its energy on manufacturing loaded headlines .
For the most part , it is the headline exchanged between people who do not have the time to read the content but want to lend credence to their own perspective on an issue .
A heavy emotionalized headline will do just that , and using technology you can fire that headline in every direction @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are thusly shared rapidly via text messaging or as a post to timelines on the various social medias .
As the world is currently filled with an army of social justice warriors ( SJW ) , so too are their timelines filled with selective headlines that emotionally emphasize the severity of the issues they feel they are valiantly fighting for or against .
Reading through the cherry-picked and heavily manipulated headlines on mainstream media news websites , we can see the reoccurrence of common themes : everyone is a racist , everyone desires @ @ @ @ @ @ @ members of the LGBT+ community are in danger , and COVID-19 is killing everyone , everywhere , at every moment .
Also manipulated are the pictures that accompany the stories .
Normally , these are selected in ways that will further the psychological impact of that which the article is trying to convey .
A story about Joe Biden making gaffes will be accompanied by a picture of Joe Biden looking confused .
A story about COVID-19 will show covered gurneys surrounded by people in hazmat suits .
A story about racism will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such as a picture of people in robes typically worn by the Klu Klux Klan .
I have even seen stock photography of young white men holding torches , mouths open as if yelling , with a headline suggesting they were white supremacist Trump supporters .
With these elements combined tactically , it should be quite obvious that we are not confronted with organizations that seek to inform us but instead to propagandize us along a divide , and within that divide they seek to victimize and demoralize us .
The divides are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ down into gender with there being radical subdivisions as we have been introduced to various complexities related to gender and further complicated by what we are told is a biological misunderstanding , with a narrative that is going so far as to try and alter our own perceptions of our own gender biology .
J. K. Rowling has been incessantly attacked for a seemingly innocent defense of what she considers to be the definition of a biological female , something that she has lived and identified with her entire life .
Those attacking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been bestowed upon them , that somehow they are being denied their own identity .
Some go so far to claim that these grievances are no less destructive than a physical attack .
How did they reach these conclusions ?
Victimization .
Certainly we all experience discrimination at some point in our lives but the truth is it happens in perpetuity when one reads the headlines and stories promoted by the mainstream media .
There is a definitive psychological impact and the people behind the engineering of these divides understand this .
You @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , man vs. woman , gender biology vs. gender fluidity , religion vs. religion , woke vs. unwoke , without the victimization of one or the other .
There is no better place than to engineer this divide by promoting victimization than through the corporate mainstream media elements most consumed by a majority of the population : television news , news papers , magazines , and websites ; an effort done most intentionally in order to manipulate large swaths of society into divided positions much like on a chess board .
It is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ minds that allows them to control us emotionally , for we forgo any semblance of emotional control when we allow ourselves to become victims .
We are segmented into like-minded collections , played against each other across the board in whichever way is politically , financially , and/or socially expedient to the corporate media masters for reasons that they seek to benefit from .
The majority of humanity , the 99 % , are thus relegated to the role of simple pawns in a much larger game whose existence they may never even @ @ @ @

It has become increasingly obvious that the corporate controlled mainstream media exists to demoralize the public by cherry-picking stories that favor a narrative that promotes victimization.
by Patrick Herbert
Incidents that are in the minority are amplified and with purposeful repetitive selection to give the impression that the conditions and circumstances surrounding a particular narrative are in the majority.
I have observed the effect that mainstream narratives have on both the collective and individual level, and the ferocious intensity with which people are convinced that the world that they read about has a one-to-one correspondence with a reality that they believe exists right outside their front door.
One need not look any further than the ocean of mask wearing individuals walking about in public, convinced that the breath of their neighbor or fellow pedestrian is a weapon of mass destruction.
The media has purposefully promoted the concept that those who do not wear a mask are an existential threat to you and your family.
According to them, you are a victim to their callous behavior; that ultimately freedom loving people who refuse to wear a mask are a threat to society.
This is intentional, for as you have been victimized you will willingly forgo any of your freedoms for a guarantee of safety.
Oh, and for good measure, the media will add that they are probably Trump supporters and thus COVID-19 deniers, a tactic sure to enrage the reader even further and a blatant effort to steer the reader politically.
While the fake pandemic is a great example of the media’s role in victimizing its audience, this tactic has been deployed for long before then, primarily for the promotion of a political, racial, and gender divide as part of the effort by those at the top to divide and rule over the population.
As the attention span of the average reader has shrunk, the media has focused its energy on manufacturing loaded headlines.
For the most part, it is the headline exchanged between people who do not have the time to read the content but want to lend credence to their own perspective on an issue.
A heavy emotionalized headline will do just that, and using technology you can fire that headline in every direction like a machine gun.
These headlines are thusly shared rapidly via text messaging or as a post to timelines on the various social medias.
As the world is currently filled with an army of social justice warriors (SJW), so too are their timelines filled with selective headlines that emotionally emphasize the severity of the issues they feel they are valiantly fighting for or against.
Reading through the cherry-picked and heavily manipulated headlines on mainstream media news websites, we can see the reoccurrence of common themes: everyone is a racist, everyone desires to keep women and minorities down, members of the LGBT+ community are in danger, and COVID-19 is killing everyone, everywhere, at every moment.
Victimization. Demoralization.
Also manipulated are the pictures that accompany the stories. Normally, these are selected in ways that will further the psychological impact of that which the article is trying to convey.
A story about Joe Biden making gaffes will be accompanied by a picture of Joe Biden looking confused. A story about COVID-19 will show covered gurneys surrounded by people in hazmat suits.
A story about racism will show pictures that emphasize the narrative, such as a picture of people in robes typically worn by the Klu Klux Klan.
I have even seen stock photography of young white men holding torches, mouths open as if yelling, with a headline suggesting they were white supremacist Trump supporters.
With these elements combined tactically, it should be quite obvious that we are not confronted with organizations that seek to inform us but instead to propagandize us along a divide, and within that divide they seek to victimize and demoralize us.
The divides are many, from political to race right down into gender with there being radical subdivisions as we have been introduced to various complexities related to gender and further complicated by what we are told is a biological misunderstanding, with a narrative that is going so far as to try and alter our own perceptions of our own gender biology.
J. K. Rowling has been incessantly attacked for a seemingly innocent defense of what she considers to be the definition of a biological female, something that she has lived and identified with her entire life.
Those attacking her feel some level of injustice has been bestowed upon them, that somehow they are being denied their own identity. Some go so far to claim that these grievances are no less destructive than a physical attack.
How did they reach these conclusions? Victimization.
Certainly we all experience discrimination at some point in our lives but the truth is it happens in perpetuity when one reads the headlines and stories promoted by the mainstream media.
There is a definitive psychological impact and the people behind the engineering of these divides understand this.
You do not have a black vs. white, man vs. woman, gender biology vs. gender fluidity, religion vs. religion, woke vs. unwoke, without the victimization of one or the other.
There is no better place than to engineer this divide by promoting victimization than through the corporate mainstream media elements most consumed by a majority of the population: television news, news papers, magazines, and websites; an effort done most intentionally in order to manipulate large swaths of society into divided positions much like on a chess board.
It is the narratives that they build in our minds that allows them to control us emotionally, for we forgo any semblance of emotional control when we allow ourselves to become victims.
We are segmented into like-minded collections, played against each other across the board in whichever way is politically, financially, and/or socially expedient to the corporate media masters for reasons that they seek to benefit from.
The majority of humanity, the 99%, are thus relegated to the role of simple pawns in a much larger game whose existence they may never even be aware of.


humansarefree--2020-08-01--Sweden Close to Reaching Herd Immunity Countrywide

In the U.S. , even as the COVID-19 curve appears to have flattened , and death rates for some groups have fallen to almost zero,1 dire warnings about an ominous “ second wave ” continue .
Likewise , Sweden , a country that has handled the pandemic differently than most of the globe , is being chided for its looser restrictions and lack of lockdowns , even as data suggest their refusal to implement a full shutdown of their society may have been the best approach after all .
While most other countries instituted stay-at-home orders and shuttered schools and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ high schools and universities closed and gatherings of more than 50 people were banned , elementary and middle schools , shops and restaurants have remained open during the pandemic.2 Now , news outlets are trying to use Sweden as an example of what not to do to fight COVID-19 , citing a high death toll .
“ The country ’ s mortality rate from the coronavirus is now 30 % higher than that of the United States when adjusted for population size , ” CBS News reported,3 but this doesn ’ t tell @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fared in comparison to the rest of the world .
Sweden May Be Close to Reaching Herd Immunity If a novel virus is introduced to a population , eventually enough people acquire natural immunity so that the number of susceptible people declines .
When the number susceptible is low enough to prevent epidemic growth , the herd immunity threshold , or HIT , has been reached .
With SARS-CoV-2 , the virus that causes COVID-19 , some estimates have suggested that 60 % to 70 % of the population must be immune before @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from Oxford , Virginia Tech , and the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine4 found that when individual variations in susceptibility and exposure are taken into account , the HIT declines to less than 10 % .5 Independent news source Off-Guardian6 cited data from Stockholm County , Sweden that showed an HIT of 17 % ,7 as well as an essay by Brown University Professor Dr. Andrew Bostom , who explained:8 “ … [ A ] respected team of infectious disease epidemiologists from the U.K. and U.S. have concluded : ‘ Naturally acquired immunity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ herd immunity threshold once as few as 10-20 % of its individuals are immune . '
” And , as pointed out in Conservative Review:9 “ … Naturally acquired herd immunity to COVID-19 combined with earnest protection of the vulnerable elderly — especially nursing home and assisted living facility residents — is an eminently reasonable and practical alternative to the dubious panacea of mass compulsory vaccination against the virus .
“ This strategy was successfully implemented in Malmo , Sweden , which had few COVID-19 deaths by assiduously protecting its elder care homes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ residents carried on drinking in bars and cafes , and the doors of hairdressers and gyms were open throughout . '
” Off-Guardian continues with Stanford ’ s Nobel-laureate Michael Levitt , who is among those in support of Sweden ’ s lighter restrictions .
Levitt successfully predicted the trajectory of COVID-19 deaths in China , including when the deaths would slow , and has stated that the pandemic would not be as dire as many have predicted .
What ’ s more , in an interview with The Stanford Daily , Levitt @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sweden stops at about 5,000 or 6,000 deaths , we will know that they ’ ve reached herd immunity , and we didn ’ t need to do any kind of lockdown.
” 10 As of July 17 , 2020 , there were 5,619 deaths in Sweden due to COVID-19,11 and in a study released by Levitt and colleagues June 30 , 2020 , which analyzes COVID-19 outbreaks at 3,546 locations worldwide , it ’ s predicted that Sweden ’ s total COVID-19 deaths will plateau at about 6,000.12 So far , Levitt @ @ @ @ @ @ @ indeed , that Sweden ’ s COVID-19 deaths have slowed , peaking at more than 100 deaths per day and now , midsummer , tallying in the low teens .
The intensive care unit at Stockholm ’ s Sodertalje Hospital has also cleared out , housing 77 cases during the pandemic ’ s peak and only four cases as of July 17 , 2020.13 Sweden continues to stand by their handling of the pandemic , despite heavy criticism .
The country ’ s state epidemiologist , Anders Tegnell , even described the rest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ madness , ” considering the steep side effects they ultimately cause .
Levitt suggested that not only did lockdowns not save lives , but likely cost lives due to social damage , domestic abuse , divorces , alcoholism and other health conditions that were not treated.14 Bloomberg reported:15 “ ‘ It was as if the world had gone mad , and everything we had discussed was forgotten , ’ Tegnell said in a podcast with Swedish Radio … ‘ The cases became too many and the political pressure got too strong .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ . '
” Tegnell stated that shutting down schools was also unnecessary during the pandemic , and scientists from the Institut Pasteur in France indeed found that there was no significant transmission of COVID-19 in primary schools , either among the students or from students to teachers.16 “ The study also confirmed that younger children infected by the novel coronavirus generally do not develop symptoms or present with minor symptoms that may result in a failure to diagnose the virus , ” study author Bruno Hoen added.17 Meanwhile , while Sweden has encouraged @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , mask usage is another story , and Tegnell has stated that there ’ s little evidence for wearing face masks.18 Outside of Sweden , other experts , including epidemiologist Dr. John Ioannidis of Stanford University , have also spoken out against statewide lockdown measures in response to COVID-19 .
Ioannidis suggests that 150 million to 300 million people may have already been infected globally and may have developed antibodies to the virus , and the median infection fatality rate has remained low at about 0.25 % .19 As continues to be demonstrated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ health problems appear to be most vulnerable , and protecting such populations should have been a priority .
But lockdowns for young , healthy people are far more questionable .
“ The death rate in a given country depends a lot on the age-structure , who are the people infected , and how they are managed .
For people younger than 45 , the infection fatality rate is almost 0 % .
For 45 to 70 , it is probably about 0.05-0.3 % .
For those above 70 , it escalates substantially , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over 85 .
For frail , debilitated elderly people with multiple health problems who are infected in nursing homes , it can go up to 25 % during major outbreaks in these facilities.
” Overall , Ioannidis said the mathematical models that predicted hospitals would be overrun by COVID-19 patients were “ astronomically wrong , ” and although a handful of U.S. hospitals did become stressed , no health systems were overrun .
“ Conversely , ” he said , “ the health care system was severely damaged in many places because of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” while lockdown measures have also significantly increased the number of people at risk of starvation while leading to financial crisis , unrest and civil strife.21 What ’ s more , one study even found that 81 % of people not exposed to SARS-CoV-2 were still able to mount an immune response against it , which “ suggests at least some built-in immune protection from SARS-CoV-2 … ” 22 With mask usage becoming an increasingly polarized debate , U.S .
Surgeon General Jerome Adams encouraged mask usage but spoke out against making them @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lead to rebellion.23 In my interview with Denis Rancourt , Ph.D. , a former full professor of physics , and a researcher with the Ontario Civil Liberties Association in Canada , we also discussed the controversial topic of masks .
Rancourt did a thorough study of the scientific literature on masks , concentrating on evidence showing masks can reduce infection risk , especially viral respiratory diseases .
If there was any significant advantage to wearing a mask to reduce infection risk to either the wearer or others in the vicinity , then it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one of these trials , yet there ’ s no sign of such a benefit .
He said in our interview : “ It makes no difference if everybody in your team is wearing a mask ; it makes no difference if one is and others aren ’ t .
Wearing a mask or being in an environment where masks are being worn or not worn , there ’ s no difference in terms of your risk of being infected by the viral respiratory disease .
“ There ’ s no reduction , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ All the studies that have been tabulated , looked at , published , I was not able to find any exceptions , if you constrain yourself to verified outcomes.
” This is another area where Sweden has stayed ahead of the curve , as they ’ ve resisted asking the public to wear masks based on lack of evidence of effectiveness and the risk that they offer wearers a false sense of security .
Tegnell did state that officials are considering whether to recommend masks during use of public transportation , but stressed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an optimal solution in any way.
” 24 Sweden Speaks Out Against WHO Warning In late June 2020 , the World Health Organization counted Sweden among European countries at risk of seeing a resurgence of COVID-19 .
The warning was based on WHO data showing Sweden had 155 infections for every 100,000 inhabitants in the past 14 days , a higher rate than in most of Europe.25 Tegnell , however , said that this was a “ total misinterpretation of the data ” and WHO was confusing Sweden with countries just at the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any rise in infections is likely due to increases in testing , Tegnell said , adding , “ They didn ’ t call to ask us .
The number of admissions to intensive care is at a very low level and even deaths are starting to go down.
” 26 Time will tell whether Sweden ’ s strategy , which avoided lockdowns and widespread mask usage , turns out to be the right one after all , but some believe the writing is already on the wall.27 “ Dr .
Michael Levitt and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” Off-Guardian reported .
“ The only way through COVID-19 is by achieving the modest ( 10-20 % ) Herd Immunity Threshold required to have the virus snuff itself out .
“ The sooner politicians — and the press — start talking about HIT and stop talking about new confirmed cases , the better off we will all be .
“ Either way , it ’ s likely weeks , not months , before the data of new daily deaths will be so low that the press will have to find something new @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over.
” From the author : The existing medical establishment is responsible for killing and permanently injuring millions of Americans , but the surging numbers of visitors to Mercola.com since I began the site in 1997 – we are now routinely among the top 10 health sites on the Internet – convinces me that you , too , are fed up with their deception .
You want practical health solutions without the hype , and that ’ s what I offer .

In the U.S., even as the COVID-19 curve appears to have flattened, and death rates for some groups have fallen to almost zero,1 dire warnings about an ominous “second wave” continue.
Likewise, Sweden, a country that has handled the pandemic differently than most of the globe, is being chided for its looser restrictions and lack of lockdowns, even as data suggest their refusal to implement a full shutdown of their society may have been the best approach after all.
While most other countries instituted stay-at-home orders and shuttered schools and businesses, Sweden did not.
While high schools and universities closed and gatherings of more than 50 people were banned, elementary and middle schools, shops and restaurants have remained open during the pandemic.2
Now, news outlets are trying to use Sweden as an example of what not to do to fight COVID-19, citing a high death toll.
“The country’s mortality rate from the coronavirus is now 30% higher than that of the United States when adjusted for population size,” CBS News reported,3 but this doesn’t tell the full picture of how Swedes have fared in comparison to the rest of the world.
Sweden May Be Close to Reaching Herd Immunity
If a novel virus is introduced to a population, eventually enough people acquire natural immunity so that the number of susceptible people declines. When the number susceptible is low enough to prevent epidemic growth, the herd immunity threshold, or HIT, has been reached.
With SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, some estimates have suggested that 60% to 70% of the population must be immune before HIT will be reached, but researchers from Oxford, Virginia Tech, and the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine4 found that when individual variations in susceptibility and exposure are taken into account, the HIT declines to less than 10%.5
Independent news source Off-Guardian6 cited data from Stockholm County, Sweden that showed an HIT of 17%,7 as well as an essay by Brown University Professor Dr. Andrew Bostom, who explained:8
“… [A] respected team of infectious disease epidemiologists from the U.K. and U.S. have concluded: ‘Naturally acquired immunity to SARS-CoV-2 may place populations over the herd immunity threshold once as few as 10-20% of its individuals are immune.'”
And, as pointed out in Conservative Review:9
“… Naturally acquired herd immunity to COVID-19 combined with earnest protection of the vulnerable elderly — especially nursing home and assisted living facility residents — is an eminently reasonable and practical alternative to the dubious panacea of mass compulsory vaccination against the virus.
“This strategy was successfully implemented in Malmo, Sweden, which had few COVID-19 deaths by assiduously protecting its elder care homes, while ‘schools remained open, residents carried on drinking in bars and cafes, and the doors of hairdressers and gyms were open throughout.'”
Off-Guardian continues with Stanford’s Nobel-laureate Michael Levitt, who is among those in support of Sweden’s lighter restrictions.
Levitt successfully predicted the trajectory of COVID-19 deaths in China, including when the deaths would slow, and has stated that the pandemic would not be as dire as many have predicted.
Have Sweden’s COVID-19 Deaths Peaked?
What’s more, in an interview with The Stanford Daily, Levitt stated in May 2020, “If Sweden stops at about 5,000 or 6,000 deaths, we will know that they’ve reached herd immunity, and we didn’t need to do any kind of lockdown.”10
As of July 17, 2020, there were 5,619 deaths in Sweden due to COVID-19,11 and in a study released by Levitt and colleagues June 30, 2020, which analyzes COVID-19 outbreaks at 3,546 locations worldwide, it’s predicted that Sweden’s total COVID-19 deaths will plateau at about 6,000.12
So far, Levitt is spot-on, and it appears, indeed, that Sweden’s COVID-19 deaths have slowed, peaking at more than 100 deaths per day and now, midsummer, tallying in the low teens.
The intensive care unit at Stockholm’s Sodertalje Hospital has also cleared out, housing 77 cases during the pandemic’s peak and only four cases as of July 17, 2020.13
Sweden’s Epidemiologist Calls Lockdowns ‘Madness’
Sweden continues to stand by their handling of the pandemic, despite heavy criticism.
The country’s state epidemiologist, Anders Tegnell, even described the rest of the world’s lockdowns as “madness,” considering the steep side effects they ultimately cause.
Levitt suggested that not only did lockdowns not save lives, but likely cost lives due to social damage, domestic abuse, divorces, alcoholism and other health conditions that were not treated.14 Bloomberg reported:15
“‘It was as if the world had gone mad, and everything we had discussed was forgotten,’ Tegnell said in a podcast with Swedish Radio … ‘The cases became too many and the political pressure got too strong. And then Sweden stood there rather alone.'”
Tegnell stated that shutting down schools was also unnecessary during the pandemic, and scientists from the Institut Pasteur in France indeed found that there was no significant transmission of COVID-19 in primary schools, either among the students or from students to teachers.16
“The study also confirmed that younger children infected by the novel coronavirus generally do not develop symptoms or present with minor symptoms that may result in a failure to diagnose the virus,” study author Bruno Hoen added.17
Meanwhile, while Sweden has encouraged its citizens to engage in social distancing, mask usage is another story, and Tegnell has stated that there’s little evidence for wearing face masks.18
Stanford Expert Slams Lockdowns
Outside of Sweden, other experts, including epidemiologist Dr. John Ioannidis of Stanford University, have also spoken out against statewide lockdown measures in response to COVID-19.
Ioannidis suggests that 150 million to 300 million people may have already been infected globally and may have developed antibodies to the virus, and the median infection fatality rate has remained low at about 0.25%.19
As continues to be demonstrated, the elderly and those with underlying health problems appear to be most vulnerable, and protecting such populations should have been a priority. But lockdowns for young, healthy people are far more questionable.
Speaking with Greek Reporter, Ioannidis said:20
“The death rate in a given country depends a lot on the age-structure, who are the people infected, and how they are managed. For people younger than 45, the infection fatality rate is almost 0%. For 45 to 70, it is probably about 0.05-0.3%.
For those above 70, it escalates substantially, to 1% or higher for those over 85. For frail, debilitated elderly people with multiple health problems who are infected in nursing homes, it can go up to 25% during major outbreaks in these facilities.”
Overall, Ioannidis said the mathematical models that predicted hospitals would be overrun by COVID-19 patients were “astronomically wrong,” and although a handful of U.S. hospitals did become stressed, no health systems were overrun.
“Conversely,” he said, “the health care system was severely damaged in many places because of the [lockdown] measures taken,” while lockdown measures have also significantly increased the number of people at risk of starvation while leading to financial crisis, unrest and civil strife.21
What’s more, one study even found that 81% of people not exposed to SARS-CoV-2 were still able to mount an immune response against it, which “suggests at least some built-in immune protection from SARS-CoV-2 …”22
US Surgeon General Opposes Mask Mandate
With mask usage becoming an increasingly polarized debate, U.S. Surgeon General Jerome Adams encouraged mask usage but spoke out against making them mandatory due to concerns that it could lead to rebellion.23
In my interview with Denis Rancourt, Ph.D., a former full professor of physics, and a researcher with the Ontario Civil Liberties Association in Canada, we also discussed the controversial topic of masks.
Rancourt did a thorough study of the scientific literature on masks, concentrating on evidence showing masks can reduce infection risk, especially viral respiratory diseases.
If there was any significant advantage to wearing a mask to reduce infection risk to either the wearer or others in the vicinity, then it would have been detected in at least one of these trials, yet there’s no sign of such a benefit.
He said in our interview:
“It makes no difference if everybody in your team is wearing a mask; it makes no difference if one is and others aren’t. Wearing a mask or being in an environment where masks are being worn or not worn, there’s no difference in terms of your risk of being infected by the viral respiratory disease.
“There’s no reduction, period. There are no exceptions. All the studies that have been tabulated, looked at, published, I was not able to find any exceptions, if you constrain yourself to verified outcomes.”
This is another area where Sweden has stayed ahead of the curve, as they’ve resisted asking the public to wear masks based on lack of evidence of effectiveness and the risk that they offer wearers a false sense of security.
Tegnell did state that officials are considering whether to recommend masks during use of public transportation, but stressed masks “definitely won’t become an optimal solution in any way.”24
Sweden Speaks Out Against WHO Warning
In late June 2020, the World Health Organization counted Sweden among European countries at risk of seeing a resurgence of COVID-19.
The warning was based on WHO data showing Sweden had 155 infections for every 100,000 inhabitants in the past 14 days, a higher rate than in most of Europe.25
Tegnell, however, said that this was a “total misinterpretation of the data” and WHO was confusing Sweden with countries just at the outset of their epidemics.
Instead, any rise in infections is likely due to increases in testing, Tegnell said, adding,
“They didn’t call to ask us. The number of admissions to intensive care is at a very low level and even deaths are starting to go down.”26
Time will tell whether Sweden’s strategy, which avoided lockdowns and widespread mask usage, turns out to be the right one after all, but some believe the writing is already on the wall.27
“Dr. Michael Levitt and Sweden have been right all along,” Off-Guardian reported.
“The only way through COVID-19 is by achieving the modest (10-20%) Herd Immunity Threshold required to have the virus snuff itself out.
“The sooner politicians — and the press — start talking about HIT and stop talking about new confirmed cases, the better off we will all be.
“Either way, it’s likely weeks, not months, before the data of new daily deaths will be so low that the press will have to find something new to scare everyone. It’s over.”
By Dr. Joseph Mercola
From the author: The existing medical establishment is responsible for killing and permanently injuring millions of Americans, but the surging numbers of visitors to Mercola.com since I began the site in 1997 – we are now routinely among the top 10 health sites on the Internet – convinces me that you, too, are fed up with their deception. You want practical health solutions without the hype, and that’s what I offer.


humansarefree--2020-08-02--Red Flags Soar As Big Pharma Will Be Exempt From COVID-19 Vaccine Liability Claims

Last week we warned readers to be cautious about new COVID-19 vaccines , highlighting how key parts of the clinical trials are being skipped as big pharma will not be held accountable for adverse side effects for administering the experimental drugs .
A senior executive from AstraZeneca , Britain ’ s second-largest drugmaker , told Reuters that his company was just granted protection from all legal action if the company ’ s vaccine led to damaging side effects .
“ This is a unique situation where we as a company simply can not take the risk if in … four @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” said Ruud Dobber , a top exec at AstraZeneca .
“ In the contracts we have in place , we are asking for indemnification .
For most countries , it is acceptable to take that risk on their shoulders because it is in their national interest , ” said Dobber , adding that Astra and regulators were making safety and tolerability a top priority .
AstraZeneca is one of the 25 pharmaceutical companies across the world , testing experimental drugs that could be used to combat the deadly virus .
And @ @ @ @ @ @ @ positive results , AstraZeneca could manufacture hundreds of millions of doses , with no legal recourse if side effects are seen .
European officials told Reuters that product liability was a significant discussion to secure new vaccine drugs from Pfizer , Sanofi , and Johnson & Johnson .
As for the US , well , when it comes to the legal framework around vaccines , the US Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) already has a law called the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness ( PREP ) Act , which provides immunity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
With AstraZeneca , and many US big pharma companies rushing COVID-19 vaccines to market with governments granting them immunity if the vaccine has side effects , all suggest corporate elites and government regulators have very little faith in these drugs .
For more color on leading vaccines in development that produce “ severe ” side effects , read our latest piece titled “ Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine Induced Adverse Reactions In “ More Than Half ” Of Trial Participants.
” Maybe these rushed vaccines are more for optics , get consumers back into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ malls .
The major red flag is how governments are allowing big pharma to rush experimental vaccines , with no legal recourse if something goes terribly wrong .

It’s no wonder the vast majority of Americans don’t believe anything they’re told about the COVID-19 virus, outside of what they have personally experienced.
by JD Heyes
If you’ve had the virus, you know how it feels, how it behaves, how it acts. It really is a lot like typical influenza for nine-out-of-10 people who get it.
In fact, many of those same people will tell you about ‘the time I got the flu and it was much worse.’
So yes, COVID-19 is real — it’s always been real — but that’s about all most people are willing to admit to.
And that’s because the “health experts” and the garbage ‘mainstream media’ we’ve all been subjected to for the past eight months have been contradictory, hypocritical and outright wrong about what information they provide us.
And there is no one more guilty of that than Dr. Anthony Fauci, the career bureaucrat and functionary who has headed up the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases since Ronald Reagan’s first term.
In terms of ‘informing’ Americans and telling us what we ought to be doing to protect ourselves from the pandemic, he’s been all over the place.
In March, for instance, Fauci was adamant during a “60 Minutes” interview when he told Americans there was no need for us to wear a mask to protect ourselves.
Not long afterward, masks were not only being recommended, use of masks was being made mandatory (and those orders remain in effect today).
Fauci was being hypocritical again this week in an interview with one of the most dishonest ‘journalists’ on one of the most dishonest networks — CNN — when asked about the pending COVID-19 jjabs coming soon to a distribution center near you.
Host Jake Tapper asked Fauci,
“Once somebody has been immunized … Once the process is complete, does that mean they can take off their mask, don’t have to social distance, and go about their lives as before?”
Here’s what he said:
“I would recommend that is not the case. I would recommend you have an added area of protection. Obviously, with 90 plus percent effective jjab, you could feel much more confident, but I would recommend to people to not abandon all public health measures just because you’ve been vaccinated.”
Say what?
“Even though for the general population, it might be 90 to 95% effective, you don’t necessarily know for you how effective it is. So when I get vaccinated, which I hope to when it becomes my turn to get vaccinated, I’m not going to abandon completely public health measures. I could feel more relaxed and essentially not having the stringency we have right now,” he added.
So — the mask-and-social distancing mandates, it turns out, are being politicized.
How else do you explain this nonsense?
The fact is, in terms of how jjabs are supposed to work (what we’re told, anyway, by Big Pharma) is that they help create and maintain herd immunity.
Okay, if that’s true, then why in the world would we still need to put on masks and socially distance?
It’s absurd; either the jjab does create that level of immunity… or it doesn’t. And if not, then why are we even talking about introducing one?
Don’t get us wrong. The effort to even develop a new virus jjab, as ineffective as Fauci now seems to say that it’ll be, was a milestone.
The president, for better or worse, came at jjab development with an all-of-government approach, and it worked. Companies spurred on with federal tax dollars indeed developed a jjab in record time.
But — apparently they don’t work because ‘The Fouch’ says we still have to distance and mask up.
Speaking of the hypocrisy and confusing messaging being given to Americans, Fauci said in April that he believed it would take a jjab for the country to get back to “normal.”
Was that a lie, too?


humansarefree--2020-08-02--Fake Numbers: Gunshot to Head, Parkinson’s Disease, Deaths in Palm Beach – ALL Attributed to COVID-1

Fake Numbers: Gunshot to Head, Parkinson’s Disease, Deaths in Palm Beach – ALL Attributed to COVID-19

When it comes to overinflated coronavirus death counts , we recently outlined how a fatal motorcycle accident in Florida was added to the state ’ s COVID-19 death toll .
Still , no precise data shows just how overinflated death counts are on a state by state level .
We have to rely on real journalism , such as a new report via CBS12 West Palm , that made a shocking discovery about deaths being incorrectly attributed to the virus .
CBS12 said a 60-year old man who died from a gunshot blast to the head was labeled as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who fell and died from a hip fracture was another .
Even a 77-year old woman who died of Parkinson ’ s disease was somehow labeled a virus-related death .
CBS12 ’ s I-Team investigated these statistical anomalies by combing through the Medical Examiner ’ s spreadsheet of all people who recently died of the virus in Palm Beach County .
What they found are “ eight cases in which a person was counted as a COVID death , but did not have COVID listed as a cause of contributing cause of death.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID-19 death is determined , it must be an immediate or underlying cause of death .
So a gunshot to the head , a falling accident , and or Parkinson ’ s disease certainly doesn ’ t fit the defined criteria of classifying these deaths as virus-related .
Residents in South Florida are furious about the overinflated death toll : “ I think it is completely misleading , ” said Rachel Eade , a Palm Beach County resident who has been researching the same issue .
“ We need to remove those cases @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we need to be giving people that information , ” said Eade , who is one of the plaintiffs suing Palm Beach County for its mask mandate .
Eade told the I-Team she ’ s been digging around in medical reports and said , out of the 581 deaths , only 169 deaths are listed as COVID-19 without any contributing factors .
Florida Gov .
Ron DeSantis recently told Fox News that his staff has been informed about virus deaths being incorrectly reported .
DeSantis said , “ I think the public , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they want to know who died because they caught COVID.
” “ If you ’ re just in a car accident – and we have had other instances where there is no real relationship , and it ’ s been counted , we want to look at that and see how pervasive that issue is as well.
” Palm Beach County Medical Examiner ’ s office and Operations Manager Paul Petrino told the I-Team the eight cases were , in fact , errors .
He said his medical staff was in the process @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recall , we pointed out last week how virus deaths could be overinflated , here ’ s Dr. Scott Jensen on Fox News in April providing more color on the situation .
If virus-related deaths are being overinflated in Florida , is the same being done in other states ?

When it comes to overinflated coronavirus death counts, we recently outlined how a fatal motorcycle accident in Florida was added to the state’s COVID-19 death toll.
Still, no precise data shows just how overinflated death counts are on a state by state level.
We have to rely on real journalism, such as a new report via CBS12 West Palm, that made a shocking discovery about deaths being incorrectly attributed to the virus.
CBS12 said a 60-year old man who died from a gunshot blast to the head was labeled as a virus death.
A 90-year old man who fell and died from a hip fracture was another. Even a 77-year old woman who died of Parkinson’s disease was somehow labeled a virus-related death.
CBS12’s I-Team investigated these statistical anomalies by combing through the Medical Examiner’s spreadsheet of all people who recently died of the virus in Palm Beach County.
What they found are “eight cases in which a person was counted as a COVID death, but did not have COVID listed as a cause of contributing cause of death.”
For more color on how a COVID-19 death is determined, it must be an immediate or underlying cause of death.
So a gunshot to the head, a falling accident, and or Parkinson’s disease certainly doesn’t fit the defined criteria of classifying these deaths as virus-related.
Residents in South Florida are furious about the overinflated death toll:
“I think it is completely misleading,” said Rachel Eade, a Palm Beach County resident who has been researching the same issue.
“We need to remove those cases that are not COVID exclusive, and we need to be giving people that information,” said Eade, who is one of the plaintiffs suing Palm Beach County for its mask mandate.
Eade told the I-Team she’s been digging around in medical reports and said, out of the 581 deaths, only 169 deaths are listed as COVID-19 without any contributing factors.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis recently told Fox News that his staff has been informed about virus deaths being incorrectly reported.
DeSantis said, “I think the public, when they see the fatality figures, they want to know who died because they caught COVID.”
Receive a daily recap featuring a curated list of must-read stories.
“If you’re just in a car accident – and we have had other instances where there is no real relationship, and it’s been counted, we want to look at that and see how pervasive that issue is as well.”
Palm Beach County Medical Examiner’s office and Operations Manager Paul Petrino told the I-Team the eight cases were, in fact, errors. He said his medical staff was in the process of relabeling those deaths.
Readers may recall, we pointed out last week how virus deaths could be overinflated, here’s Dr. Scott Jensen on Fox News in April providing more color on the situation.
If virus-related deaths are being overinflated in Florida, is the same being done in other states?
By Tyler Durden, Guest writer


humansarefree--2020-08-02--Google: ‘Contact Tracing’ App to Launch in Coming Weeks

Shortly after launching a new contact-tracing program in Ontario , a top Google executive said in a blog post published Friday that 20 US states and territories ( roughly 45 % of the country ’ s population ) are “ exploring ” using the tool Google built with Apple to create new contact-tracing programs , and that the new apps are set to launch in the coming weeks .
Google had previously said in May that three states , Alabama , North Dakota and South Carolina , would be launching apps using the exposure notification tool .
Those states are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Additionally , the company said during its update that 16 countries and regions outside the US have launched apps using the Apple-Google tool , while other countries – including France and the UK – have sought to build their own tools from scratch , though the UK infamously pivoted , abandoned its custom system , and adopted the Google-Apple protocol .
However , the UK has yet to launch this new app , and it ’ s unclear when it will be ready , as the Telegraph recently reported .
Here ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ system ( which is based on the Google-Apple system ) is supposed to work , per the Telegraph .
The technology should enable users to track whether they came in contact with any infected people via bluetooth signals .
VP of Engineering David Burke penned the post , which was published Friday afternoon on the East Coast .

Shortly after launching a new contact-tracing program in Ontario, a top Google executive said in a blog post published Friday that 20 US states and territories (roughly 45% of the country’s population) are “exploring” using the tool Google built with Apple to create new contact-tracing programs, and that the new apps are set to launch in the coming weeks.
Google had previously said in May that three states, Alabama, North Dakota and South Carolina, would be launching apps using the exposure notification tool. Those states are still using the protocols, it appears.
Additionally, the company said during its update that 16 countries and regions outside the US have launched apps using the Apple-Google tool, while other countries – including France and the UK – have sought to build their own tools from scratch, though the UK infamously pivoted, abandoned its custom system, and adopted the Google-Apple protocol.
However, the UK has yet to launch this new app, and it’s unclear when it will be ready, as the Telegraph recently reported.
Here’s how the UK’s app-based system (which is based on the Google-Apple system) is supposed to work, per the Telegraph.
The technology should enable users to track whether they came in contact with any infected people via bluetooth signals.
VP of Engineering David Burke penned the post, which was published Friday afternoon on the East Coast.
By Tyler Durden (excerpt)


humansarefree--2020-08-02--The Deep State and The Global Reset – Unplugged

Imagine , you are living in a world that you are told is a democracy – and you may even believe it – but in fact your life and fate is in the hands of a few ultra-rich , ultra-powerful and ultra-inhuman oligarchs .
They may be called Deep State , or simply the Beast , or anything else obscure or untraceable – it doesn ’ t matter .
They are less than the 0.0001 % .
For lack of a better expression , let ’ s call them for now “ obscure individuals ” .
These obscure individuals who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ elected .
We don ’ t need to name them .
You will figure out who they are , and why they are famous , and some of them totally invisible .
They have created structures , or organisms without any legal format .
They are fully out of international legality .
They are a forefront for the Beast .
Maybe there are several competing Beasts .
But they have the same objective : A New or One World Order ( NWO , or OWO ) .
These obscure individuals are running , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( WEF – representing Big Industry , Big Finance and Big Fame ) , the Group of 7 – G7 , the Group of 20 – G20 ( the leaders of the economically ” strongest ” nations ) .
There are also some lesser entities , called the Bilderberg Society , the Council on Foreign Relations ( CFR ) , Chatham House and more .
The members of all of them are overlapping .
Even this expanded forefront combined represents less than 0.001 % .
They all have superimposed themselves over sovereign national @ @ @ @ @ @ @ THE multinational world body , the United Nations , the UN .
In fact , they have coopted the UN to do their bidding .
UN Director Generals , as well as the DGs of the multiple UN-suborganizations , are chosen mostly by the US , with the consenting nod of their European vassals – according to the candidate ’ s political and psychological profile .
If his or her ‘ performance ’ as head of the UN or head of one of the UN suborganizations fails , his or her days are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Beast ( s ) are also , the European Union , the Bretton Woods Organizations , World Bank and IMF , as well as the World Trade Organization ( WTO ) – and – make no mistake – the International Criminal Court ( ICC ) in The Hague .
It has no teeth .
Just to make sure the law is always on the side of the lawless .
In addition to the key international financial institutions , WB and IMF , there are the so-called regional development banks and similar financial institutions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ regions in check .
In the end its financial or debt-economy that controls everything .
Western neoliberal banditry has created a system , where political disobedience can be punished by economic oppression or outright theft of national assets in international territories .
The system ’ s common denominator is the ( still ) omnipresent US-dollar .
The supremacy of these obscure unelected individuals becomes ever more exposed .
We , the People consider it “ normal ” that they call the shots , not what we call – or once were proud of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ elected governments .
They have become a herd of obedient sheep .
The Beast has gradually and quietly taken over .
We haven ’ t noticed .
It ’ s the salami tactic : You cut off slice by tiny slice and when the salami is gone , you realize that you have nothing left , that your freedom , your civil and human rights are gone .
By then it ’ s too late .
Case in point is the US Patriot Act .
It was prepared way before 9/11 .
Once @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Legislation was whizzed through Congress in no time – for the people ’ s future protection – people called for it for fear – and – bingo , the Patriot Act took about 90 % of the American population ’ s freedom and civil rights away .
For good .
We have become enslaved to the Beast .
The Beast calls the shots on boom or bust of our economies , on who should be shackled by debt , when and where a pandemic should break out , and on the conditions of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ social confinement .
And to top it all off – the instruments the Beast uses , very cleverly , are a tiny-tiny invisible enemy , called a virus , and a huge but also invisible monster , called FEAR .
That keeps us off the street , off reunions with our friends , and off our social entertainment , theatre , sports , or a picnic in the park .
Soon the Beast will decide who will live and who will die , literally – if we let it .
This may be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pandemic and people may beg , yell and scream for a vaccine , for their death knell , and for the super bonanza of Big Pharma – and towards the objectives of the eugenicists blatantly roaming the world – see this .
There is still time to collectively say NO .
Collectively and solidarily .
Take the latest case of blatant imposture .
Conveniently , after the first wave of Covid-19 had passed , at least in the Global North , where the major world decisions are made , in early June 2020 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Schwab , announced “ The Great Reset ” .
Taking advantage of the economic collapse – the crisis shock , as in “ The Shock Doctrine ” – Mr. Schwab , one of the Beast ’ s frontrunners , announces openly what the WEF will discuss and decide for the world-to-come in their next Davos Forum in January 2021 .
For more details see this .
Will , We , The People , accept the agenda of the unelected WEF ?
It will opportunely focus on the protection of what ’ s left @ @ @ @ @ @ @ center will be man-made CO2-based “ Global Warming ” .
The instrument for that protection of nature and humankind will be the UN Agenda 2030 – which equals the UN Sustainable Development Goals ( SDG ) .
It will focus on how to rebuild the willfully destroyed global economy , while respecting the ( “ green ” ) principles of the 17 SDGs .
Mind you , it ’ s all connected .
There are no coincidences .
The infamous Agenda 2021 which coincides with and complements the so-called ( UN ) Agenda @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the WEF ’ s official declaration of The Great Reset , in January 2021 .
Similarly , the implementation of the agenda of The Great Reset began in January 2020 , by the launch of the corona pandemic – planned for decades with the latest visible events being the 2010 Rockefeller Report with its “ Lockstep Scenario ” , and Event 201 , of 18 October in NYC which computer-simulated a corona pandemic , leaving within 18 months 65 million deaths and an economy in ruin , programmed just a few weeks before @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The racial riots , initiated by the movement Black Lives Matter ( funded by the Ford Foundation and Soros ’ Open Society Foundation ) , following the brutal assassination of the Afro-American George Floyd by a gang of Minneapolis police , and spreading like brush-fire in no time to more than 160 cities , first in the US , then in Europe – are not only connected to the Beast ’ s agenda , but they were a convenient deviation from the human catastrophe left behind by Covid-19 .
The Beast ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s really behind the UN Agenda 2030 is the little heard-of Agenda ID2020 .
It has been created and funded by the vaccination guru Bill Gates , and so has GAVI ( Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations ) , the association of Big Pharma – involved in creating the corona vaccines , and which funds along with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ( BMGF ) a major proportion of WHO ’ s budget .
The Great Reset , as announced by WEF ’ s Klaus Schwab , is supposedly implemented by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ meets the eye .
Agenda ID2020 is even anchored in the SDGs , as SDG 16.9 “ by 2030 provide legal [ digital ] identity for all , including free birth registration ” .
This fits perfectly into the overall goal of SDG 16 : ” Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development , provide access to justice for all and build effective , accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels.
” Following the official path of the UN Agenda 2030 of achieving the SDGs , the ‘ implementing ’ Agenda ID2020 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ school children in Bangladesh – will provide digitized IDs possibly in the form of nano-chips implanted along with compulsory vaccination programs , will promote digitization of money and the rolling out of 5G – which would be needed to upload and monitor personal data on the nano chips and to control the populace .
Agenda ID2020 will most likely also include ‘ programs ’ – through vaccination ?
– of significantly reducing world population .
Eugenics is an important component in the control of future world population under a NOW / OWO – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in 1980 .
The ruling elite used the lockdown as an instrument to carry out this agenda .
Its implementation would naturally face massive protests , organized and funded along the same lines as were the BLM protests and demonstrations .
They may not be peaceful – and may not be planned as being peaceful .
Because to control the population in the US and in Europe , where most of the civil unrest would be expected , a total militarization of the people is required .
This is well under preparation .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” , John Steppling reports from a NYT article that a “ minimum of 93,763 machine guns , 180,718 magazine cartridges , hundreds of silencers and an unknown number of grenade launchers have been provided to state and local police departments in the US since 2006 .
“ This is in addition to at least 533 planes and helicopters , and 432 MRAPs — 9-foot high , 30-ton Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected armored vehicles with gun turrets and more than 44,900 pieces of night vision equipment , regularly used in nighttime raids in Afghanistan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ militarization is part of a broader trend .
Since the late 1990s , about 89 percent of police departments in the United States serving populations of 50,000 people or more had a PPU ( Police Paramilitary Unit ) , almost double of what existed in the mid-1980s .
He refers to these militarized police as the new Gestapo .
Even before Covid , about 15 % to 20 % of the population was on or below the poverty line in the United States .
The post-covid lockdown economic annihilation will at least double @ @ @ @ @ @ @ risk for civil turbulence and clashes with authorities – further enhancing the reasoning for a militarized police force .
None of these scenarios will , of course , be presented to the public by the WEF in January 2021 .
These are decisions taken behind closed doors by the key actors for the Beast .
However , this grandiose plan of the Great Reset does not have to happen .
There is at least half the world population and some of the most powerful countries , economically and militarily – like China and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Reset ” maybe yes , but not in these western terms .
In fact , a reset of kinds is already happening with China about to roll out a new People ’ s Bank of China backed blockchain-based cryptocurrency , the crypto RMB , or yuan .
This is not only a hard currency based on a solid economy , it is also supported by gold .
While President Trump keeps trashing China for unfair trade , for improperly managing the covid pandemic , for stealing property rights – China bashing no end @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and that the US will cut trading ties with China – or cut ties altogether , China is calling Trump ’ s bluff .
China is quietly reorienting herself towards the ASEAN countries plus Japan ( yes , Japan ! )
and South Korea , where trade already today accounts for about 15 % of all China ’ s trade and is expected to double in the next five years .
Despite the lockdown and the disruption of trade , China ’ s overall exports recovered with a 3.2 % increase in April @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This overall performance in China exports was nonetheless accompanied by a dramatic decline in US-China trade .
China exports to the US decreased by 7.9 % in April ( in relation to April 2019 ) .
It is clear that the vast majority of US industries could not survive without Chinese supply chains .
The western dependence on Chinese medical supplies is particularly strong .
Let alone Chinese dependence by US consumers .
In 2019 , US total consumption , about 70 % of GDP , amounted to $ 13.3 trillion , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ imported from China or dependent on ingredients from China .
The WEF-masters are confronted with a real dilemma .
Their plan depends very much on the dollar supremacy which would continue to allow dishing out sanctions and confiscating assets from those countries opposing US rule ; a dollar-hegemony which would allow imposing the components of The Great Reset scheme , as described above .
At present , the dollar is fiat money , debt-money created from thin air .
It has no backing whatsoever .
Therefore , its worth as a reserve currency @ @ @ @ @ @ @ new crypto-yuan from China .
In order to compete with the Chinese yuan , the US Government would have to move away from its monetary Ponzi-scheme , by separating itself from the 1913 Federal Reserve Act and print her own US-economy- and possibly gold-backed ( crypto ) money – not fiat FED-money , as is the case today .
That would mean cutting the more than 100-year old ties to the Rothschild and Co. clan-owned FED , and creating a real peoples-owned central bank .
Not impossible , but highly improbable .
Here @ @ @ @ @ @ @ world power is at stake .
Meanwhile , China , with her philosophy of endless creation would continue forging ahead unstoppably with her mammoth socioeconomic development plan of the 21st Century , the Belt and Road Initiative , connecting and bridging the world with infrastructure for land and maritime transport , with joint research and industrial projects , cultural exchanges – and not least , multinational trade with “ win-win ” characteristics , equality for all partners – towards a multi-polar world , towards a world with a common future for mankind .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ associated with BRI – and the field is wide open for others to join – and to defy , unmask and unplug The Great Reset of the West .

Imagine, you are living in a world that you are told is a democracy – and you may even believe it – but in fact your life and fate is in the hands of a few ultra-rich, ultra-powerful and ultra-inhuman oligarchs.
They may be called Deep State, or simply the Beast, or anything else obscure or untraceable – it doesn’t matter. They are less than the 0.0001%.
For lack of a better expression, let’s call them for now “obscure individuals”.
These obscure individuals who pretend running our world have never been elected. We don’t need to name them. You will figure out who they are, and why they are famous, and some of them totally invisible.
They have created structures, or organisms without any legal format. They are fully out of international legality. They are a forefront for the Beast. Maybe there are several competing Beasts. But they have the same objective: A New or One World Order (NWO, or OWO).
These obscure individuals are running, for example, The World Economic Forum (WEF – representing Big Industry, Big Finance and Big Fame), the Group of 7 – G7, the Group of 20 – G20 (the leaders of the economically” strongest” nations).
There are also some lesser entities, called the Bilderberg Society, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Chatham House and more.
The members of all of them are overlapping. Even this expanded forefront combined represents less than 0.001%. They all have superimposed themselves over sovereign national elected and constitutional governments, and over THE multinational world body, the United Nations, the UN.
In fact, they have coopted the UN to do their bidding. UN Director Generals, as well as the DGs of the multiple UN-suborganizations, are chosen mostly by the US, with the consenting nod of their European vassals – according to the candidate’s political and psychological profile.
If his or her ‘performance’ as head of the UN or head of one of the UN suborganizations fails, his or her days are counted. Coopted or created by the Beast(s) are also, the European Union, the Bretton Woods Organizations, World Bank and IMF, as well as the World Trade Organization (WTO) – and – make no mistake – the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague. It has no teeth. Just to make sure the law is always on the side of the lawless.
In addition to the key international financial institutions, WB and IMF, there are the so-called regional development banks and similar financial institutions, keeping the countries of their respective regions in check.
In the end its financial or debt-economy that controls everything. Western neoliberal banditry has created a system, where political disobedience can be punished by economic oppression or outright theft of national assets in international territories. The system’s common denominator is the (still) omnipresent US-dollar.
“Unelected Individuals”
The supremacy of these obscure unelected individuals becomes ever more exposed. We, the People consider it “normal” that they call the shots, not what we call – or once were proud of calling, our sovereign nations and sovereignly elected governments. They have become a herd of obedient sheep.
The Beast has gradually and quietly taken over. We haven’t noticed. It’s the salami tactic: You cut off slice by tiny slice and when the salami is gone, you realize that you have nothing left, that your freedom, your civil and human rights are gone. By then it’s too late.
Case in point is the US Patriot Act. It was prepared way before 9/11. Once 9/11 “happened”, the Patriot Legislation was whizzed through Congress in no time – for the people’s future protection – people called for it for fear – and – bingo, the Patriot Act took about 90% of the American population’s freedom and civil rights away. For good.
We have become enslaved to the Beast. The Beast calls the shots on boom or bust of our economies, on who should be shackled by debt, when and where a pandemic should break out, and on the conditions of surviving the pandemic, for example, social confinement.
And to top it all off – the instruments the Beast uses, very cleverly, are a tiny-tiny invisible enemy, called a virus, and a huge but also invisible monster, called FEAR.
That keeps us off the street, off reunions with our friends, and off our social entertainment, theatre, sports, or a picnic in the park.
Soon the Beast will decide who will live and who will die, literally – if we let it. This may be not far away.
Another wave of pandemic and people may beg, yell and scream for a jjab, for their death knell, and for the super bonanza of Big Pharma – and towards the objectives of the eugenicists blatantly roaming the world – see this.
There is still time to collectively say NO. Collectively and solidarily.
Take the latest case of blatant imposture. Conveniently, after the first wave of Covid-19 had passed, at least in the Global North, where the major world decisions are made, in early June 2020, the unelected WEF Chairman, Klaus Schwab, announced “The Great Reset”.
Taking advantage of the economic collapse – the crisis shock, as in “The Shock Doctrine” – Mr. Schwab, one of the Beast’s frontrunners, announces openly what the WEF will discuss and decide for the world-to-come in their next Davos Forum in January 2021. For more details see this.
Will, We, The People, accept the agenda of the unelected WEF?
It will opportunely focus on the protection of what’s left of Mother Earth; obviously at the center will be man-made CO2-based “Global Warming”.
The instrument for that protection of nature and humankind will be the UN Agenda 2030 – which equals the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). It will focus on how to rebuild the willfully destroyed global economy, while respecting the (“green”) principles of the 17 SDGs.
Mind you, it’s all connected. There are no coincidences. The infamous Agenda 2021 which coincides with and complements the so-called (UN) Agenda 2030, will be duly inaugurated by the WEF’s official declaration of The Great Reset, in January 2021.
Similarly, the implementation of the agenda of The Great Reset began in January 2020, by the launch of the corona pandemic – planned for decades with the latest visible events being the 2010 Rockefeller Report with its “Lockstep Scenario”, and Event 201, of 18 October in NYC which computer-simulated a corona pandemic, leaving within 18 months 65 million deaths and an economy in ruin, programmed just a few weeks before the launch of the actual corona pandemic.
The Race Riots
The racial riots, initiated by the movement Black Lives Matter (funded by the Ford Foundation and Soros’ Open Society Foundation), following the brutal assassination of the Afro-American George Floyd by a gang of Minneapolis police, and spreading like brush-fire in no time to more than 160 cities, first in the US, then in Europe – are not only connected to the Beast’s agenda, but they were a convenient deviation from the human catastrophe left behind by Covid-19.
The Beast’s nefarious plan to implement what’s really behind the UN Agenda 2030 is the little heard-of Agenda ID2020.
It has been created and funded by the vaccination guru Billy Boy, and so has GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations), the association of Big Pharma – involved in creating the corona jjabs, and which funds along with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) a major proportion of WHO’s budget.
The Great Reset, as announced by WEF’s Klaus Schwab, is supposedly implemented by Agenda ID2020. It is more than meets the eye. Agenda ID2020 is even anchored in the SDGs, as SDG 16.9 “by 2030 provide legal [digital] identity for all, including free birth registration”.
This fits perfectly into the overall goal of SDG 16:
”Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels.”
Following the official path of the UN Agenda 2030 of achieving the SDGs, the ‘implementing’ Agenda ID2020 – which is currently being tested on school children in Bangladesh – will provide digitized IDs possibly in the form of nano-chips implanted along with compulsory vaccination programs, will promote digitization of money and the rolling out of 5G – which would be needed to upload and monitor personal data on the nano chips and to control the populace.
Agenda ID2020 will most likely also include ‘programs’ – through vaccination? – of significantly reducing world population. Eugenics is an important component in the control of future world population under a NOW / OWO – see also Georgia Guidestones, mysteriously built in 1980.
The ruling elite used the lockdown as an instrument to carry out this agenda. Its implementation would naturally face massive protests, organized and funded along the same lines as were the BLM protests and demonstrations.
They may not be peaceful – and may not be planned as being peaceful. Because to control the population in the US and in Europe, where most of the civil unrest would be expected, a total militarization of the people is required. This is well under preparation.
In his essay “The Big Plantation”, John Steppling reports from a NYT article that a “minimum of 93,763 machine guns, 180,718 magazine cartridges, hundreds of silencers and an unknown number of grenade launchers have been provided to state and local police departments in the US since 2006.
“This is in addition to at least 533 planes and helicopters, and 432 MRAPs — 9-foot high, 30-ton Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected armored vehicles with gun turrets and more than 44,900 pieces of night vision equipment, regularly used in nighttime raids in Afghanistan and Iraq.”
He adds that this militarization is part of a broader trend. Since the late 1990s, about 89 percent of police departments in the United States serving populations of 50,000 people or more had a PPU (Police Paramilitary Unit), almost double of what existed in the mid-1980s. He refers to these militarized police as the new Gestapo.
Even before Covid, about 15% to 20% of the population was on or below the poverty line in the United States.
The post-covid lockdown economic annihilation will at least double that percentage – and commensurately increase the risk for civil turbulence and clashes with authorities – further enhancing the reasoning for a militarized police force.
China’s Crypto RMB
None of these scenarios will, of course, be presented to the public by the WEF in January 2021. These are decisions taken behind closed doors by the key actors for the Beast.
However, this grandiose plan of the Great Reset does not have to happen. There is at least half the world population and some of the most powerful countries, economically and militarily – like China and Russia – opposed to it.
“Reset” maybe yes, but not in these western terms.
In fact, a reset of kinds is already happening with China about to roll out a new People’s Bank of China backed blockchain-based cryptocurrency, the crypto RMB, or yuan.
This is not only a hard currency based on a solid economy, it is also supported by gold.
While President Trump keeps trashing China for unfair trade, for improperly managing the covid pandemic, for stealing property rights – China bashing no end – that China depends on the US and that the US will cut trading ties with China – or cut ties altogether, China is calling Trump’s bluff.
China is quietly reorienting herself towards the ASEAN countries plus Japan (yes, Japan!) and South Korea, where trade already today accounts for about 15% of all China’s trade and is expected to double in the next five years.
Despite the lockdown and the disruption of trade, China’s overall exports recovered with a 3.2% increase in April (in relation to April 2019).
This overall performance in China exports was nonetheless accompanied by a dramatic decline in US-China trade. China exports to the US decreased by 7.9% in April (in relation to April 2019).
It is clear that the vast majority of US industries could not survive without Chinese supply chains. The western dependence on Chinese medical supplies is particularly strong. Let alone Chinese dependence by US consumers.
In 2019, US total consumption, about 70% of GDP, amounted to $13.3 trillion, of which a fair amount is directly imported from China or dependent on ingredients from China.
The WEF-masters are confronted with a real dilemma. Their plan depends very much on the dollar supremacy which would continue to allow dishing out sanctions and confiscating assets from those countries opposing US rule; a dollar-hegemony which would allow imposing the components of The Great Reset scheme, as described above.
At present, the dollar is fiat money, debt-money created from thin air. It has no backing whatsoever. Therefore, its worth as a reserve currency is increasingly decaying, especially vis-à-vis the new crypto-yuan from China.
In order to compete with the Chinese yuan, the US Government would have to move away from its monetary Ponzi-scheme, by separating itself from the 1913 Federal Reserve Act and print her own US-economy- and possibly gold-backed (crypto) money – not fiat FED-money, as is the case today.
That would mean cutting the more than 100-year old ties to the Rothschild and Co. clan-owned FED, and creating a real peoples-owned central bank.
Not impossible, but highly improbable. Here, two Beasts might clash, as world power is at stake.
Meanwhile, China, with her philosophy of endless creation would continue forging ahead unstoppably with her mammoth socioeconomic development plan of the 21st Century, the Belt and Road Initiative, connecting and bridging the world with infrastructure for land and maritime transport, with joint research and industrial projects, cultural exchanges – and not least, multinational trade with “win-win” characteristics, equality for all partners – towards a multi-polar world, towards a world with a common future for mankind.
Today already more than 120 countries are associated with BRI – and the field is wide open for others to join – and to defy, unmask and unplug The Great Reset of the West.
Copyright © Peter Koenig, Global Research, 2020


humansarefree--2020-08-03--From Lockdowns to ‘The Great Reset’

From Lockdowns to ‘The Great Reset’

The lockdown in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic has accelerated the implementation of long-held plans to establish a so-called new world order .
Under the auspices of the World Economic Forum ( WEF ) , global policymakers are advocating for a “ Great Reset ” with the intent of creating a global technocracy .
It is not by coincidence that on October 18 , 2019 , in New York City the WEF participated in “ Event 201 ” at the “ high-level ” pandemic exercise organized by the John Hopkins Center for Health Security .
This coming technocracy involves @ @ @ @ @ @ @ digital industry and of governments .
With programs such as guaranteed minimum income and healthcare for all , the new kind of governance combines strict societal control with the promise of comprehensive social justice .
The truth , however , is that this new world order of digital tyranny comes with a comprehensive social credit system .
The People ’ s Republic of China is the pioneer of this method of surveillance and control of individuals , corporations , and sociopolitical entities .
For the individual , one ’ s identity is reduced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ almost any personal activity .
In order to gain a few individual rights , and be it only to travel to a certain place , a person must balance such apparent privileges with his submission to a web of regulations that define in detail what is “ good behavior ” and deemed as beneficial to humankind and the environment .
For example , during a pandemic , this sort of control would extend from the obligation of wearing a mask and practicing social distancing to having specific vaccinations in order to apply for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is , in short , a type of social engineering which is the opposite of a spontaneous order or of development .
Like the mechanical engineer with a machine , the social engineer — or technocrat — treats society as an object .
Different from the brutal suppressions by the totalitarianism of earlier times , the modern social engineer will try to make the social machine work on its own according to the design .
For this purpose , the social engineer must apply the laws of society the way the mechanical engineer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ theory has reached a stage of knowledge that makes the dreams of social engineering possible .
The machinations of social engineering operate not through brute force , but subtly by nudge .
Under the order envisioned by the Great Reset , the advancement of technology is not meant to serve the improvement of the conditions of the people but to submit the individual to the tyranny of a technocratic state .
“ The experts know better ” is the justification .
The plan for an overhaul of the world is the brainchild of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and their intellectual entourage that used to meet in Davos , Switzerland , in January each year .
Brought into existence in 1971 , the World Economic Forum has become a megaglobal event since then .
More than three thousand leaders from all over the world attended the meeting in 2020 .
Under the guidance of the WEF , the agenda of the Great Reset says that the completion of the current industrial transformation requires a thorough overhaul of the economy , politics , and society .
Such a comprehensive transformation requires @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thus “ transhumanism ” is part of the program .
The Great Reset will be the theme of the fifty-first meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos in 2021 .
Its agenda is the commitment to move the world economy toward “ a more fair , sustainable and resilient future.
” The program calls for “ a new social contract ” that is centered on racial equality , social justice , and the protection of the nature .
Climate change requires us “ to decarbonize the economy ” and to bring human @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nature.
” The aim is to build “ more equal , inclusive and sustainable economies.
” This new world order must be “ urgently ” implemented , the promotors of the WEF claim , and they point out that the pandemic “ has laid bare the unsustainability of our system , ” which lacks “ social cohesion.
” The WEF ’ s great reset project is social engineering at the highest level .
Advocates of the reset contend that the UN failed to establish order in the world and could not advance forcefully @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as Agenda 2030 — because of its bureaucratic , slow , and contradictory way of working .
In contrast , the actions of the organizational committee of the World Economic Forum are swift and smart .
When a consensus has been formed , it can be implemented by the global elite all over the world .
The ideology of the World Economic Forum is neither left nor right , nor progressive or conservative , it is also not fascist or communist , but outright technocratic .
As such , it includes many elements @ @ @ @ @ @ @ decades , the consensus has emerged at the annual Davos meetings that the world needs a revolution , and that reforms have taken too long .
The members of the WEF envision a profound upheaval at short notice .
The time span should be so brief that most people will hardly realize that a revolution is going on .
The change must be so swift and dramatic that those who recognize that a revolution is happening do not have the time to mobilize against it .
The basic idea of the Great Reset @ @ @ @ @ @ @ radical transformations from the French to the Russian and Chinese Revolutions .
It is the idea of constructivist rationalism incorporated in the state .
But projects like the Great Reset leave unanswered the question of who rules the state .
The state itself does not rule .
It is an instrument of power .
It is not the abstract state that decides , but the leaders of specific political parties and of certain social groups .
Earlier totalitarian regimes needed mass executions and concentration camps to maintain their power .
Now , with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is believed , dissenters can easily be identified and marginalized .
The nonconformists will be silenced by disqualifying divergent opinions as morally despicable .
The 2020 lockdowns possibly offer a preview of how this system works .
The lockdown worked as if it had been orchestrated — and perhaps it was .
As if following a single command , the leaders of big and small nations — and of different stages of economic development — implemented almost identical measures .
Not only did many governments act in unison , they also applied these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ consequences of a global lockdown .
Months of economic stillstand have destroyed the economic basis of millions of families .
Together with social distancing , the lockdown has produced a mass of people unable to care for themselves .
First , governments destroyed the livelihood , then the politicians showed up as the savior .
The demand for social assistance is no longer limited to specific groups , but has become a need of the masses .
Once , war was the health of the state .
Now it is fear of disease @ @ @ @ @ @ @ apparent coziness of a benevolent comprehensive welfare state with a guaranteed minimum income and healthcare and education for all .
The lockdown and its consequences have brought a foretaste what is to come : a permanent state of fear , strict behavioral control , massive loss of jobs , and growing dependence on the state .
With the measures taken in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic , a big step to reset the global economy has been made .
Without popular resistance , the end of the pandemic will not mean the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
At the moment , however , the opponents of the new world order of digital tyranny still have access to the media and platforms to dissent .
Yet the time is running out .
The perpetrators of the new world order have smelled blood .
Declaring the coronavirus a pandemic has come in handy to promote the agenda of their Great Reset .
Only massive opposition can slow down and finally stop the extension of the power grip of the tyrannical technocracy that is on the rise .

The lockdown in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic has accelerated the implementation of long-held plans to establish a so-called new world order. Under the auspices of the World Economic Forum (WEF), global policymakers are advocating for a “Great Reset” with the intent of creating a global technocracy.
by Antony P. Mueller
It is not by coincidence that on October 18, 2019, in New York City the WEF participated in “Event 201” at the “high-level” pandemic exercise organized by the John Hopkins Center for Health Security.
This coming technocracy involves close cooperation between the heads of the digital industry and of governments. With programs such as guaranteed minimum income and healthcare for all, the new kind of governance combines strict societal control with the promise of comprehensive social justice.
The truth, however, is that this new world order of digital tyranny comes with a comprehensive social credit system. The People’s Republic of China is the pioneer of this method of surveillance and control of individuals, corporations, and sociopolitical entities.
For the individual, one’s identity is reduced to an app or chip that registers almost any personal activity. In order to gain a few individual rights, and be it only to travel to a certain place, a person must balance such apparent privileges with his submission to a web of regulations that define in detail what is “good behavior” and deemed as beneficial to humankind and the environment.
For example, during a pandemic, this sort of control would extend from the obligation of wearing a mask and practicing social distancing to having specific vaccinations in order to apply for a job or to travel.
It is, in short, a type of social engineering which is the opposite of a spontaneous order or of development. Like the mechanical engineer with a machine, the social engineer — or technocrat — treats society as an object. Different from the brutal suppressions by the totalitarianism of earlier times, the modern social engineer will try to make the social machine work on its own according to the design.
For this purpose, the social engineer must apply the laws of society the way the mechanical engineer follows the laws of nature. Behavioral theory has reached a stage of knowledge that makes the dreams of social engineering possible. The machinations of social engineering operate not through brute force, but subtly by nudge.
Under the order envisioned by the Great Reset, the advancement of technology is not meant to serve the improvement of the conditions of the people but to submit the individual to the tyranny of a technocratic state. “The experts know better” is the justification.
The Agenda
The plan for an overhaul of the world is the brainchild of an elite group of businessmen, politicians, and their intellectual entourage that used to meet in Davos, Switzerland, in January each year. Brought into existence in 1971, the World Economic Forum has become a megaglobal event since then. More than three thousand leaders from all over the world attended the meeting in 2020.
Under the guidance of the WEF, the agenda of the Great Reset says that the completion of the current industrial transformation requires a thorough overhaul of the economy, politics, and society. Such a comprehensive transformation requires the alteration of human behavior, and thus “transhumanism” is part of the program.
The Great Reset will be the theme of the fifty-first meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos in 2021. Its agenda is the commitment to move the world economy toward “a more fair, sustainable and resilient future.” The program calls for “a new social contract” that is centered on racial equality, social justice, and the protection of the nature.
Climate change requires us “to decarbonize the economy” and to bring human thinking and behavior “into harmony with nature.” The aim is to build “more equal, inclusive and sustainable economies.”
This new world order must be “urgently” implemented, the promotors of the WEF claim, and they point out that the pandemic “has laid bare the unsustainability of our system,” which lacks “social cohesion.”
The WEF’s great reset project is social engineering at the highest level. Advocates of the reset contend that the UN failed to establish order in the world and could not advance forcefully its agenda of sustainable development — known as Agenda 2030 — because of its bureaucratic, slow, and contradictory way of working.
In contrast, the actions of the organizational committee of the World Economic Forum are swift and smart. When a consensus has been formed, it can be implemented by the global elite all over the world.
Social Engineering
The ideology of the World Economic Forum is neither left nor right, nor progressive or conservative, it is also not fascist or communist, but outright technocratic. As such, it includes many elements of earlier collectivist ideologies.
In recent decades, the consensus has emerged at the annual Davos meetings that the world needs a revolution, and that reforms have taken too long. The members of the WEF envision a profound upheaval at short notice.
The time span should be so brief that most people will hardly realize that a revolution is going on. The change must be so swift and dramatic that those who recognize that a revolution is happening do not have the time to mobilize against it.
The basic idea of the Great Reset is the same principle that guided the radical transformations from the French to the Russian and Chinese Revolutions. It is the idea of constructivist rationalism incorporated in the state.
But projects like the Great Reset leave unanswered the question of who rules the state. The state itself does not rule. It is an instrument of power. It is not the abstract state that decides, but the leaders of specific political parties and of certain social groups.
Earlier totalitarian regimes needed mass executions and concentration camps to maintain their power. Now, with the help of new technologies, it is believed, dissenters can easily be identified and marginalized. The nonconformists will be silenced by disqualifying divergent opinions as morally despicable.
The 2020 lockdowns possibly offer a preview of how this system works. The lockdown worked as if it had been orchestrated — and perhaps it was.
As if following a single command, the leaders of big and small nations — and of different stages of economic development — implemented almost identical measures. Not only did many governments act in unison, they also applied these measures with little regard for the horrific consequences of a global lockdown.
Months of economic stillstand have destroyed the economic basis of millions of families. Together with social distancing, the lockdown has produced a mass of people unable to care for themselves. First, governments destroyed the livelihood, then the politicians showed up as the savior. The demand for social assistance is no longer limited to specific groups, but has become a need of the masses.
Once, war was the health of the state. Now it is fear of disease. What lies ahead is not the apparent coziness of a benevolent comprehensive welfare state with a guaranteed minimum income and healthcare and education for all. The lockdown and its consequences have brought a foretaste what is to come: a permanent state of fear, strict behavioral control, massive loss of jobs, and growing dependence on the state.
With the measures taken in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic, a big step to reset the global economy has been made. Without popular resistance, the end of the pandemic will not mean the end of the lockdown and social distancing.
At the moment, however, the opponents of the new world order of digital tyranny still have access to the media and platforms to dissent. Yet the time is running out. The perpetrators of the new world order have smelled blood.
Declaring the coronavirus a pandemic has come in handy to promote the agenda of their Great Reset. Only massive opposition can slow down and finally stop the extension of the power grip of the tyrannical technocracy that is on the rise.