thedailycaller--2020-09-27--Mississippi State Football Players Mock LSU With Locker Room Dance After Massive Upset Win

Mississippi State football players buried LSU with their locker room celebration after upsetting the Tigers .
The Bulldogs danced to “ Get the Gat , ” which is the famous song associated with the Tigers and the dance made famous during their national title run .
( RELATED : David Hookstead Is The True King In The North When It Comes To College Football ) This right here is why college football is so much damn fun .
Not only did the Bulldogs pull off the huge upset , which I called , but they then danced on their graves @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this kind of energy , then you ’ re simply not a college football fan .
I can ’ t be any blunter than that .
Something tells me that the Bulldogs are going to be a ton of fun with Mike Leach running the show .
All they do is throw the ball all over the field , and they opened 2020 by upsetting the defending national champs .
I have no doubt at all that we ’ re in for a great show this season down in Starkville .
I made @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Ole Miss back in August , and I couldn ’ t be happier with my choice .
One week into the SEC slate , and it ’ s pure electricity .

Mississippi State football players buried LSU with their locker room celebration after upsetting the Tigers.
The Bulldogs danced to “Get the Gat,” which is the famous song associated with the Tigers and the dance made famous during their national title run. (RELATED: David Hookstead Is The True King In The North When It Comes To College Football)
Watch the awesome video below.
Mississippi State dancing on LSU’s grave by dancing to Get The Gat after today’s game is straight up disrespectful pic.twitter.com/5RcZaLj05E — Barstool Sports (@barstoolsports) September 27, 2020
This right here is why college football is so much damn fun. Not only did the Bulldogs pull off the huge upset, which I called, but they then danced on their graves.
If you don’t enjoy this kind of energy, then you’re simply not a college football fan. I can’t be any blunter than that.
Something tells me that the Bulldogs are going to be a ton of fun with Mike Leach running the show. All they do is throw the ball all over the field, and they opened 2020 by upsetting the defending national champs.
I have no doubt at all that we’re in for a great show this season down in Starkville.
Mike Leach recaps his first day as an SEC head coach: “ better than average” Uhhhh ya think?pic.twitter.com/LUNlFnNCGa — Barstool Sports (@barstoolsports) September 26, 2020
I made the decision to ride with Mississippi State and Ole Miss back in August, and I couldn’t be happier with my choice. One week into the SEC slate, and it’s pure electricity.


thedailycaller--2020-09-27--Falcons CB A.J. Terrell Is The First NFL Player To Miss A Game Because Of Coronavirus

Atlanta Falcons defensive back A.J .
Terrell won ’ t play Sunday against the Bears because of coronavirus .
According to Adam Schefter , Terrell has been placed on the league ’ s coronavirus list , and he ’ ll be the first player in the NFL to miss the game because of the virus .
( RELATED : David Hookstead Is The True King In The North When It Comes To College Football ) Being on the list doesn ’ t mean you have the virus , but it means you might have been in contact with somebody exposed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to make a big deal of this , but it ’ s really not a big deal at all .
We made it to week three in the NFL , and there ’ s one player who has had to miss a game .
All things considered , I ’ d say that ’ s a pretty big win for the NFL , especially when you consider how many players are in the league .
Keep Terrell away from the rest of the team , keep the team safe and allow him to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ go .
This isn ’ t rocket science .
The protocols are pretty straight forward , and they clearly work .
Everything is going to be just fine , and there ’ s no reason for fans of the Falcons to panic !
Let ’ s keep the strong momentum rolling !

Atlanta Falcons defensive back A.J. Terrell won’t play Sunday against the Bears because of coronavirus.
According to Adam Schefter, Terrell has been placed on the league’s coronavirus list, and he’ll be the first player in the NFL to miss the game because of the virus. (RELATED: David Hookstead Is The True King In The North When It Comes To College Football)
Being on the list doesn’t mean you have the virus, but it means you might have been in contact with somebody exposed.
Falcons’ CB A.J. Terrell is being placed on the reserve COVID list and is out for Sunday’s game against the Bears. He now becomes the first NFL player this season to miss a game due to COVID. — Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) September 26, 2020
Falcons got the news about CB A.J. Terrell’s test today; it was from a test he took Friday morning. Terrell practiced Friday. Now immediate contact tracing goes into effect, per league protocols, but the Falcons have not gotten any other positive test results. https://t.co/0mqy9dNLUG — Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) September 26, 2020
Some in the media might want to make a big deal of this, but it’s really not a big deal at all. We made it to week three in the NFL, and there’s one player who has had to miss a game.
All things considered, I’d say that’s a pretty big win for the NFL, especially when you consider how many players are in the league.
View this post on Instagram A post shared by Aundell Terrell Jr (AJ) (@ajterrell_8) on Sep 13, 2020 at 7:01am PDT
Keep Terrell away from the rest of the team, keep the team safe and allow him to return once he’s good to go.
This isn’t rocket science. The protocols are pretty straight forward, and they clearly work.
View this post on Instagram A post shared by Aundell Terrell Jr (AJ) (@ajterrell_8) on Aug 9, 2020 at 4:34pm PDT
Everything is going to be just fine, and there’s no reason for fans of the Falcons to panic! Let’s keep the strong momentum rolling!


thedailycaller--2020-09-27--The Detroit Lions Have To Beat The Arizona Cardinals

It ’ s do or die time for the Detroit Lions against the Arizona Cardinals .
The Lions have to beat the Cardinals today .
There ’ s simply no other option on the table for Detroit .
A loss will bring us to 0-3 , and that ’ s completely unacceptable .
( RELATED : David Hookstead Is The True King In The North When It Comes To College Football ) As usual , it ’ s a different year , but it ’ s the same Detroit Lions .
Through two games , we ’ ve blown a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ raced by the Packers .
You can set your clock to being disappointed by the Lions .
It ’ s the same story every single year .
At some point , the Lions either need to prove they ’ re actually a real NFL team or we have to clean house .
As much as I like several guys on our roster , you either win or you go home .
Nobody , and I mean nobody , is more responsible for this mess than Matt Patricia .
If we lose today , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The game starts at 4:25 EST today .
If we lose , I expect changes to be made before the sun comes up tomorrow .
I ’ m sick and tired of watching Detroit piss away games , and I know the fanbase agrees with me .

It’s do or die time for the Detroit Lions against the Arizona Cardinals.
The Lions have to beat the Cardinals today. There’s simply no other option on the table for Detroit. A loss will bring us to 0-3, and that’s completely unacceptable. (RELATED: David Hookstead Is The True King In The North When It Comes To College Football)
As usual, it’s a different year, but it’s the same Detroit Lions. Through two games, we’ve blown a lead in spectacular fashion and got boat raced by the Packers.
You can set your clock to being disappointed by the Lions. It’s the same story every single year.
#Lions rookie DeAndre Swift drops a game-winning TD. #Bears hang on to win 27-23. UNREAL. pic.twitter.com/a9xEPWFIwH — NFL Update (@MySportsUpdate) September 13, 2020
At some point, the Lions either need to prove they’re actually a real NFL team or we have to clean house.
As much as I like several guys on our roster, you either win or you go home. Nobody, and I mean nobody, is more responsible for this mess than Matt Patricia.
If we lose today, he should be fired on the spot.
The game starts at 4:25 EST today. If we lose, I expect changes to be made before the sun comes up tomorrow. I’m sick and tired of watching Detroit piss away games, and I know the fanbase agrees with me.


thedailycaller--2020-09-27--Will Upsets Become The New Normal During The 2020 College Football Season?

It looks like 2020 will be the year of upsets in college football .
On Saturday , we watched Kansas State upset Oklahoma and we watched Mississippi State pull off the biggest upset of the year when they beat LSU by 10 .
( RELATED : David Hookstead Is The True King In The North When It Comes To College Football ) We ’ ve also seen smaller upsets around the college football landscape .
It begs the question : is this the year of upsets ?
For those of you who don ’ t remember , I ’ ve @ @ @ @ @ @ @ football season would be nonstop chaos .
Why ?
It ’ s really simple .
Teams have had unusual practice schedules , there are a ton of distractions and home field advantage no longer exists with fans restricted .
You combine all those factors , and you have a recipe for a wild season .
It might be hard for the average fan to understand , but the talent gap between a really good SEC team and an above average SEC team isn ’ t as big as you might think .
You @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and tack on the coronavirus pandemic to it all , and it doesn ’ t take much for the giants to start falling .
Hell , Georgia was struggling with Arkansas for a half yesterday !
Saturday brought us two massive upsets with Kansas State and Mississippi State .
As a college football fanatic , I feel confident when I say we ’ re just getting started .

It looks like 2020 will be the year of upsets in college football.
On Saturday, we watched Kansas State upset Oklahoma and we watched Mississippi State pull off the biggest upset of the year when they beat LSU by 10. (RELATED: David Hookstead Is The True King In The North When It Comes To College Football)
We’ve also seen smaller upsets around the college football landscape. It begs the question: is this the year of upsets?
For those of you who don’t remember, I’ve been arguing for months that this college football season would be nonstop chaos.
Why? It’s really simple. Teams have had unusual practice schedules, there are a ton of distractions and home field advantage no longer exists with fans restricted.
You combine all those factors, and you have a recipe for a wild season.
It might be hard for the average fan to understand, but the talent gap between a really good SEC team and an above average SEC team isn’t as big as you might think.
You take away 100,000 fans, restrict practices and tack on the coronavirus pandemic to it all, and it doesn’t take much for the giants to start falling.
Hell, Georgia was struggling with Arkansas for a half yesterday!
Saturday brought us two massive upsets with Kansas State and Mississippi State. As a college football fanatic, I feel confident when I say we’re just getting started.


thedailycaller--2020-09-27--Will Muschamp Tells South Carolina Fans To ‘Get The F**k’ Out Of Their Seats In Leaked Video

South Carolina football coach Will Muschamp might have had the best video on the internet Saturday .
Twitter user @ cocks_by_90 tweeted a leaked video of Muschamp saying , “ It ’ s time for Carolina football .
So , get the f**k out of your seats .
Spurs up !
” ( RELATED : David Hookstead Is The True King In The North When It Comes To College Football ) You can watch the awesome video below .
According to Mike Uva , the video was filmed two years ago , but “ was never intended to be released @ @ @ @ @ @ @ think that ’ s a very obvious thing to say .
I ’ m going to get a little woke here , but this seems like a classic situation of a leak that nobody is really going to be mad about .
This is about the coolest thing Will Muschamp has ever done .
Sure , USC officials might publicly condemn it , but don ’ t think for a second they weren ’ t juiced behind the scenes .
It ’ s similar to the infamous LSU locker room video after beating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s wrong in public , but we all know everyone loves it .
Keep that energy , Muschamp .
It ’ s what makes college football so much fun .

South Carolina football coach Will Muschamp might have had the best video on the internet Saturday.
Twitter user @cocks_by_90 tweeted a leaked video of Muschamp saying, “It’s time for Carolina football. So, get the f**k out of your seats. Spurs up!” (RELATED: David Hookstead Is The True King In The North When It Comes To College Football)
You can watch the awesome video below.
According to Mike Uva, the video was filmed two years ago, but “was never intended to be released to the public.” Yeah, I think that’s a very obvious thing to say.
The video circulating of Will Muschamp colorfully encouraging Gamecocks fans to get out of their seats is real but it was shot nearly two years ago. The video was never intended to be released to the public, according to USC. @wachfox — Mike Uva (@Mike_Uva) September 26, 2020
I’m going to get a little woke here, but this seems like a classic situation of a leak that nobody is really going to be mad about.
This is about the coolest thing Will Muschamp has ever done. Sure, USC officials might publicly condemn it, but don’t think for a second they weren’t juiced behind the scenes.
View this post on Instagram A post shared by Gamecock Football (@gamecockfb) on Sep 26, 2020 at 11:00am PDT
It’s similar to the infamous LSU locker room video after beating Alabama. People will say it’s wrong in public, but we all know everyone loves it.
Keep that energy, Muschamp. It’s what makes college football so much fun.


thedailycaller--2020-09-27--The Detroit Lions Upset The Arizona Cardinals 26-23

The Detroit Lions upset the Arizona Cardinals 26-23 on Sunday .
Entering the game , I made it crystal clear that this was a must win game for the Lions .
There was no way around it .
( RELATED : David Hookstead Is The True King In The North When It Comes To College Football ) While it wasn ’ t pretty at all , the Lions actually managed to win .
I guess when I doubt them most , they show up and show out .
We were throwing the ball well , the defense was making plays @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the team as a whole looked good .
The Cardinals are no joke , and the Lions didn ’ t back down today .
I ’ m damn proud .
I ’ m tougher on the Lions than most fans .
Despite the fact that I ’ m used to losing all the time , I still expect to win .
It ’ s part of my DNA .
That ’ s why it pisses me off so much when the Lions fail to get the job done .
Luckily , that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Now , let ’ s go build on it and string some wins together .

The Detroit Lions upset the Arizona Cardinals 26-23 on Sunday.
Entering the game, I made it crystal clear that this was a must win game for the Lions. There was no way around it. (RELATED: David Hookstead Is The True King In The North When It Comes To College Football)
While it wasn’t pretty at all, the Lions actually managed to win. I guess when I doubt them most, they show up and show out.
We were throwing the ball well, the defense was making plays, Jeff Okudah had some great moments and the team as a whole looked good.
The Cardinals are no joke, and the Lions didn’t back down today. I’m damn proud.
I’m tougher on the Lions than most fans. Despite the fact that I’m used to losing all the time, I still expect to win. It’s part of my DNA.
That’s why it pisses me off so much when the Lions fail to get the job done. Luckily, that wasn’t an issue today.
Jesse James with the #BudLightCelly in the end zone pic.twitter.com/bra2R0Txf9 — Detroit Lions (@Lions) September 27, 2020
Now, let’s go build on it and string some wins together.


thedailycaller--2020-09-27--‘A Person Of The Utmost Integrity’: Notre Dame Gets Behind Judge Amy Coney Barrett

University of Notre Dame leaders voiced their support of alumna and law professor Judge Amy Coney Barrett ’ s nomination to the Supreme Court of the United States Saturday , according to the Notre Dame News .
University of Notre Dame President Rev .
John I. Jenkins praised Barrett ’ s character and said it “ will serve her and the nation equally well as a Justice of the United States Supreme Court , ” according to the Notre Dame News .
“ An alumna and a faculty member of Notre Dame Law School , Judge Barrett has epitomized the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ scholarship , justice and service to society .
She is a person of the utmost integrity who , as a jurist , acts first and foremost in accord with the law , ” Jenkins continued , according to the Notre Dame News .
President Donald Trump officially nominated Barrett to the Supreme Court on Sept. 26 .
The federal judge will succeed former Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg if confirmed by the Senate .
Ginsburg died on Sept. 18 from metastatic pancreas cancer complications , according to a Supreme Court press release @ @ @ @ @ @ @ School in 1997 , has been a faculty member there since 2002 and is the first of the school ’ s graduates and faculty to be nominated to the court , according to the Notre Dame News .
( RELATED : These Are The Attacks Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney Barrett Has Already Faced From Democrats ) “ I join her colleagues in the Law School and across the campus in congratulating her on the nomination , and wish her and her family well through what has become , sadly , a personally @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , according to the Notre Dame News .
G. Marcus Cole , dean and professor of law at Notre Dame Law School , also praised and described Barrett ’ s reputation as a professor at the school , according to the Notre Dame News .
“ On a personal note , she is one of the most thoughtful , open-minded , considerate and kind people I have ever met .
She lives a life of humility and grace , devoted to her family and community , ” Cole continued , according to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has served our nation with true distinction from the bench , and would continue to do so if she were confirmed to serve on our nation ’ s highest court.
” The University of Notre Dame and Notre Dame Law School did not immediately respond to the DCNF ’ s request for further comment .
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience .
For licensing opportunities of our original content , please contact licensing @ dailycallernewsfoundation.org .

University of Notre Dame leaders voiced their support of alumna and law professor Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s nomination to the Supreme Court of the United States Saturday, according to the Notre Dame News.
University of Notre Dame President Rev. John I. Jenkins praised Barrett’s character and said it “will serve her and the nation equally well as a Justice of the United States Supreme Court,” according to the Notre Dame News.
“An alumna and a faculty member of Notre Dame Law School, Judge Barrett has epitomized the University’s commitment to teaching, scholarship, justice and service to society. She is a person of the utmost integrity who, as a jurist, acts first and foremost in accord with the law,” Jenkins continued, according to the Notre Dame News.
Judge Amy Coney Barrett, professor of law and a 1997 graduate of @NDLaw, was nominated today to the Supreme Court of the United States to fill the vacancy created by the death of Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.https://t.co/yV65ZcB3Ze pic.twitter.com/bq6EyDsEQa — Notre Dame (@NotreDame) September 26, 2020
President Donald Trump officially nominated Barrett to the Supreme Court on Sept. 26. The federal judge will succeed former Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg if confirmed by the Senate.
Ginsburg died on Sept. 18 from metastatic pancreas cancer complications, according to a Supreme Court press release.
Barrett graduated from Notre Dame Law School in 1997, has been a faculty member there since 2002 and is the first of the school’s graduates and faculty to be nominated to the court, according to the Notre Dame News. (RELATED: These Are The Attacks Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney Barrett Has Already Faced From Democrats)
“I join her colleagues in the Law School and across the campus in congratulating her on the nomination, and wish her and her family well through what has become, sadly, a personally bruising confirmation process,” Jenkins continued, according to the Notre Dame News.
G. Marcus Cole, dean and professor of law at Notre Dame Law School, also praised and described Barrett’s reputation as a professor at the school, according to the Notre Dame News.
“On a personal note, she is one of the most thoughtful, open-minded, considerate and kind people I have ever met. She lives a life of humility and grace, devoted to her family and community,” Cole continued, according to the Notre Dame News.
“Judge Barrett has served our nation with true distinction from the bench, and would continue to do so if she were confirmed to serve on our nation’s highest court.”
The University of Notre Dame and Notre Dame Law School did not immediately respond to the DCNF’s request for further comment.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.


thedailycaller--2020-09-27--PHOTOS: Protesters, Police Officers Clash Again In Portland

PORTLAND – Police declared an unlawful assembly late Saturday evening outside of the Mark O. Hatfield U.S .
Courthouse in Portland , Oregon .
Protesters threw water bottles at officers and police in riot gear told the crowd to “ move back ” and pushed individuals toward Chapman Square , where they told the crowd that the park was closed and arrested a few individuals .
( RELATED : Portland Rioters Set Police Union Building Ablaze , Over A Dozen Arrested ) “ This has been declared an unlawful assembly all persons must immediately leave the area by traveling to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ adhere to this order may subject you to arrest , citation or crowd control agents including but not limited to tear gas and impact weapons , all persons must immediately leave the area to the north or the west , ” police said over a loudspeaker .
The Daily Caller News Foundation was on the scene in Portland .
View the exclusive photos below : Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience .
For licensing opportunities of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dailycallernewsfoundation.org .

PORTLAND – Police declared an unlawful assembly late Saturday evening outside of the Mark O. Hatfield U.S. Courthouse in Portland, Oregon.
Protesters threw water bottles at officers and police in riot gear told the crowd to “move back” and pushed individuals toward Chapman Square, where they told the crowd that the park was closed and arrested a few individuals. (RELATED: Portland Rioters Set Police Union Building Ablaze, Over A Dozen Arrested)
“This has been declared an unlawful assembly all persons must immediately leave the area by traveling to the north or the west failure to adhere to this order may subject you to arrest, citation or crowd control agents including but not limited to tear gas and impact weapons, all persons must immediately leave the area to the north or the west,” police said over a loudspeaker.
The Daily Caller News Foundation was on the scene in Portland. View the exclusive photos below:
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.


thedailycaller--2020-09-27--Chuck Todd Falsely Claims ‘Nobody Made Those Footnotes’ About Supreme Court Nominations In 2016

“ Meet the Press ” host Chuck Todd falsely claimed Sunday that no one had made “ footnotes ” in 2016 indicating that the rules for Supreme Court nominations depended on the balance of power between the White House and the Senate .
Todd made the claim while speaking to Republican Missouri Sen. Roy Blunt about his party ’ s plan to go ahead with the confirmation of Judge Amy Coney Barrett , whom President Donald Trump nominated to replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg .
( RELATED : ‘ A Lot Of Things That Are Constitutional Are Stupid @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Barrett Nomination ) Todd began by noting the polls , asking Blunt why Republicans would go ahead with the confirmation process when polling suggested the people might prefer to see a nomination go forward after the election .
Blunt explained that the Senate should only be concerned with the two requirements set by the Constitution — a presidential nomination and Senate confirmation .
He went on to point out that nominations were consistently made during election years , and that when the Senate and the president were in political agreement , confirmation was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when President Obama made his nomination , that not only would he want to make a nomination that he was probably constitutionally obligated , to make an obligation and the other half of that necessary formula just wasn ’ t there to get that done and now it is there , ” Blunt added .
“ Do you regret the hypocritical argument you guys made four years ago creating this — this sort of standard out of thin air and then backtracking on it four years later ?
” Todd asked .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these footnotes that says it depends on who controls the Senate .
Senator Blunt , nobody made those footnotes in 2016 , it was crystal clear to the American public what your views are .
Are you concerned that the party looks like a bunch of hypocrites four weeks before the election ?
” Blunt replied that he had made such “ footnotes ” in 2016 — and he wasn ’ t the only one .
George Washington University Law professor Jonathan Turley quoted Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell as saying on February @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Senate has not filled a vacancy arising in an election year when there was divided government since 1888 , almost 130 years ago.
” President Donald Trump officially nominated Barrett to the high court Saturday , and the Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to take up the confirmation process in the coming days .

“Meet the Press” host Chuck Todd falsely claimed Sunday that no one had made “footnotes” in 2016 indicating that the rules for Supreme Court nominations depended on the balance of power between the White House and the Senate.
Todd made the claim while speaking to Republican Missouri Sen. Roy Blunt about his party’s plan to go ahead with the confirmation of Judge Amy Coney Barrett, whom President Donald Trump nominated to replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. (RELATED: ‘A Lot Of Things That Are Constitutional Are Stupid’: Laurence Tribe Blasts Amy Coney Barrett Nomination)
WATCH:
Todd began by noting the polls, asking Blunt why Republicans would go ahead with the confirmation process when polling suggested the people might prefer to see a nomination go forward after the election.
Blunt explained that the Senate should only be concerned with the two requirements set by the Constitution — a presidential nomination and Senate confirmation. He went on to point out that nominations were consistently made during election years, and that when the Senate and the president were in political agreement, confirmation was all but assured.
“I said when President Obama made his nomination, that not only would he want to make a nomination that he was probably constitutionally obligated, to make an obligation and the other half of that necessary formula just wasn’t there to get that done and now it is there,” Blunt added.
“Do you regret the hypocritical argument you guys made four years ago creating this — this sort of standard out of thin air and then backtracking on it four years later?” Todd asked. “I know you guys came up with these footnotes that says it depends on who controls the Senate. Senator Blunt, nobody made those footnotes in 2016, it was crystal clear to the American public what your views are. Are you concerned that the party looks like a bunch of hypocrites four weeks before the election?”
Blunt replied that he had made such “footnotes” in 2016 — and he wasn’t the only one.
George Washington University Law professor Jonathan Turley quoted Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell as saying on February 22, 2016, “Remember that the Senate has not filled a vacancy arising in an election year when there was divided government since 1888, almost 130 years ago.”
…Todd has repeatedly told NBC viewers that no such statements were ever made. Statements like McConnell’s on Feb. 22, 2016: “remember that the Senate has not filled a vacancy arising in an election year when there was divided government since 1888, almost 130 years ago.” — Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) September 27, 2020
President Donald Trump officially nominated Barrett to the high court Saturday, and the Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to take up the confirmation process in the coming days.


thedailycaller--2020-09-27--Biden Leads In Michigan And Wisconsin, While Race Remains Close In North Carolina And Georgia, New P

Biden Leads In Michigan And Wisconsin, While Race Remains Close In North Carolina And Georgia, New Polls Show

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden leads President Donald Trump in Michigan and Wisconsin , two battleground states that Trump won in 2016 , by eight and 10 points , respectively , according to an NBC News/Marist poll .
In Michigan , Biden leads Trump 52 % -44 % , while he leads in Wisconsin 54 % -44 % , the poll shows .
The margins reflect a gap between the two that has remained relatively consistent .
Biden ’ s average lead is 6.8 points in Michigan and 6.9 points in Wisconsin , according to FiveThirtyEight , compared to 7.6 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Trump ’ s approval rating among Michigan likely voters is 43 % , compared to 42 % in Wisconsin , the survey shows , trailing each state ’ s Democratic governor .
In Michigan , Gov .
Gretchen Whitmer has an approval rating of 56 % , while Wisconsin Gov .
Tony Evers has an approval rating of 50 % , NBC reported .
( RELATED : Here ’ s Where The Presidential Race Stands In Six Critical Battlegrounds ) The presidential race is much closer in North Carolina and Georgia , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
In North Carolina , Biden leads Trump 48 % -46 % while Trump leads Biden 47 % -46 % in Georgia , according to data from each state .
Trump won both states in 2016 .
Both states also have competitive Senate races , the CBS poll shows .
In North Carolina , GOP Sen. Thom Tillis trails Democratic nominee Cal Cunningham by 10 points , according to the poll .
Cunningham has constantly led in polls against Tillis , leading by an average of six points , according to RealClearPolitics .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ leads Jon Ossoff , his Democratic challenger , by five points , according to the survey .
Perdue has a slim lead over Ossoff , leading by an average of 3.8 points , according to RealClearPolitics .
In South Carolina , GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham finds himself in an increasingly competitive Senate race , despite Trump leading Biden in the state by 10 points , according to the CBS poll .
Graham leads Jamie Harrison , his Democratic challenger , 45 % -44 % , the poll shows .
( RELATED : These @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Costing The GOP Its Majority ) Both the NBC and CBS polls also show that the Supreme Court has become an issue of greater importance for voters .
Majorities of voters in both North Carolina and Georgia said that the court ’ s vacancy made the 2020 election more important , CBS reported .
In Michigan and Wisconsin , majorities of voters said that the winner of the 2020 election should fill the vacancy , while 35 % and 37 % in each state said that Trump should fill the seat , NBC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and 727 likely voters in Michigan and Wisconsin , respectively , and has a margin of error of 4.3 % and 4.6 % in each state .
The CBS poll surveyed 1,213 and 1,164 registered voters in North Carolina and Georgia , respectively , and has a margin of error of 3.6 % and 3.3 % in each state .
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience .
For licensing opportunities of our original content , please @ @ @ @ @

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden leads President Donald Trump in Michigan and Wisconsin, two battleground states that Trump won in 2016, by eight and 10 points, respectively, according to an NBC News/Marist poll.
In Michigan, Biden leads Trump 52%-44%, while he leads in Wisconsin 54%-44%, the poll shows. The margins reflect a gap between the two that has remained relatively consistent. Biden’s average lead is 6.8 points in Michigan and 6.9 points in Wisconsin, according to FiveThirtyEight, compared to 7.6 points and 5.9 points one month ago.
Trump’s approval rating among Michigan likely voters is 43%, compared to 42% in Wisconsin, the survey shows, trailing each state’s Democratic governor. In Michigan, Gov. Gretchen Whitmer has an approval rating of 56%, while Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers has an approval rating of 50%, NBC reported. (RELATED: Here’s Where The Presidential Race Stands In Six Critical Battlegrounds)
The presidential race is much closer in North Carolina and Georgia, according to a recent CBS News poll.
In North Carolina, Biden leads Trump 48%-46% while Trump leads Biden 47%-46% in Georgia, according to data from each state. Trump won both states in 2016.
Both states also have competitive Senate races, the CBS poll shows. In North Carolina, GOP Sen. Thom Tillis trails Democratic nominee Cal Cunningham by 10 points, according to the poll. Cunningham has constantly led in polls against Tillis, leading by an average of six points, according to RealClearPolitics.
In Georgia, GOP Sen. David Perdue leads Jon Ossoff, his Democratic challenger, by five points, according to the survey. Perdue has a slim lead over Ossoff, leading by an average of 3.8 points, according to RealClearPolitics.
In South Carolina, GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham finds himself in an increasingly competitive Senate race, despite Trump leading Biden in the state by 10 points, according to the CBS poll. Graham leads Jamie Harrison, his Democratic challenger, 45%-44%, the poll shows. (RELATED: These Vulnerable Senators Risk Losing Their Seats, Costing The GOP Its Majority)
Both the NBC and CBS polls also show that the Supreme Court has become an issue of greater importance for voters.
Majorities of voters in both North Carolina and Georgia said that the court’s vacancy made the 2020 election more important, CBS reported.
In Michigan and Wisconsin, majorities of voters said that the winner of the 2020 election should fill the vacancy, while 35% and 37% in each state said that Trump should fill the seat, NBC reported.
The NBC poll surveyed 799 and 727 likely voters in Michigan and Wisconsin, respectively, and has a margin of error of 4.3% and 4.6% in each state.
The CBS poll surveyed 1,213 and 1,164 registered voters in North Carolina and Georgia, respectively, and has a margin of error of 3.6% and 3.3% in each state.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.


thedailycaller--2020-09-27--‘Failure To Lead’: NYC Principals Union Votes ‘No Confidence’ In Bill De Blasio

New York City ’ s principals union declared a unanimous vote of “ no confidence ” in Mayor Bill de Blasio on Sunday due to his “ failure to lead ” the city ’ s schools to a successful return .
The Council of School Supervisors and Administrators ( CSA ) , which represents more than 6,400 New York City school administrators , called on de Blasio and the city ’ s department of education chancellor Richard Carranza to cede control of the city ’ s public school system to the State of New York , according to an email @ @ @ @ @ @ @ want school buildings reopened and have been tirelessly planning to welcome back students since the end of last school year , ” CSA President Mark Cannizzaro said in a statement .
( RELATED : Florida Judge Hands Teachers Union Opposed To School Reopenings A Victory ) He continued : “ They must now look staff , parents , and children in the eye and say that they have done all they can to provide a safe and quality educational experience , but given the limited resources provided them , this is becoming increasingly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have lost faith in de Blasio .
He said the city needs help from the state to ensure a safe return to in-person classes .
Most in-person elementary classes in the city were delayed until Sept. 29 while high school classes were delayed until Oct. 1 due to the shortages of teachers and supplies , de Blasio announced on Sept. 17 .
The announcement came weeks after the Democratic mayor had already announced an in-person class delay .
“ For months , teachers , principals and school staff have been working hard to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they deserve while putting health and safety first , ” de Blasio said at the press conference .
Returning to in-person classes amidst the coronavirus pandemic has been met with lawsuits , protests and strongly-worded messages from teachers union leaders nationwide .
De Blasio canceled the remaining spring 2020 in-person classes days after President Donald Trump declared a national emergency in March over the rapidly spreading virus , The Daily Beast reported .
In addition to the shortage of teachers , there have been significant issues with school buildings , according to WABC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and cockroaches inside a Queens high school with WABC .
Other teachers have complained about ventilation and sanitation problems , WABC reported .
Teachers staged a march in New York on Sept. 17 protesting the city ’ s lack of preparation for the school year .
“ Starting schools a week later without putting any of the protocols in place that are necessary to keep our students safe is not going to fix the problem , ” a teacher said , WABC reported .
The CSA had 13,717 total members as of December @ @ @ @ @ @ @ filings .
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience .
For licensing opportunities of our original content , please contact licensing @ dailycallernewsfoundation.org .

New York City’s principals union declared a unanimous vote of “no confidence” in Mayor Bill de Blasio on Sunday due to his “failure to lead” the city’s schools to a successful return.
The Council of School Supervisors and Administrators (CSA), which represents more than 6,400 New York City school administrators, called on de Blasio and the city’s department of education chancellor Richard Carranza to cede control of the city’s public school system to the State of New York, according to an email press release Sunday.
“School leaders want school buildings reopened and have been tirelessly planning to welcome back students since the end of last school year,” CSA President Mark Cannizzaro said in a statement. (RELATED: Florida Judge Hands Teachers Union Opposed To School Reopenings A Victory)
He continued: “They must now look staff, parents, and children in the eye and say that they have done all they can to provide a safe and quality educational experience, but given the limited resources provided them, this is becoming increasingly difficult.”
Cannizzaro added that school leaders have lost faith in de Blasio. He said the city needs help from the state to ensure a safe return to in-person classes.
Most in-person elementary classes in the city were delayed until Sept. 29 while high school classes were delayed until Oct. 1 due to the shortages of teachers and supplies, de Blasio announced on Sept. 17. The announcement came weeks after the Democratic mayor had already announced an in-person class delay.
“For months, teachers, principals and school staff have been working hard to make sure our students have the education they deserve while putting health and safety first,” de Blasio said at the press conference.
Returning to in-person classes amidst the coronavirus pandemic has been met with lawsuits, protests and strongly-worded messages from teachers union leaders nationwide.
De Blasio canceled the remaining spring 2020 in-person classes days after President Donald Trump declared a national emergency in March over the rapidly spreading virus, The Daily Beast reported.
In addition to the shortage of teachers, there have been significant issues with school buildings, according to WABC. One teacher shared video of mice and cockroaches inside a Queens high school with WABC.
Other teachers have complained about ventilation and sanitation problems, WABC reported. Teachers staged a march in New York on Sept. 17 protesting the city’s lack of preparation for the school year.
“Starting schools a week later without putting any of the protocols in place that are necessary to keep our students safe is not going to fix the problem,” a teacher said, WABC reported.
The CSA had 13,717 total members as of December 2019, according to Department of Labor filings.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.


thedailycaller--2020-09-27--Portland Rioters Hurl Firecrackers, Rocks At Officers, Weapons Recovered As Unrest Continues, Police

Portland Rioters Hurl Firecrackers, Rocks At Officers, Weapons Recovered As Unrest Continues, Police Say

Portland rioters repeatedly tossed rocks , fireworks and other objects at officers on Saturday as unrest continued to fester in the city , police said .
Hundreds of demonstrators blocked traffic near a law enforcement precinct and hurled firecrackers , stones and soda cans at officers attempting to break up the disturbance , according to a Multnomah County Sheriff ’ s Office press release .
Officers were also struck with metal ball bearings from slingshots , the release detailed .
The exact number of arrests made was not disclosed by MCSO , but one arrestee by the name of Michael @ @ @ @ @ @ @ blocks while in zip-tie cuffs , according to the release .
“ Officers attempted to disengage and leave the area multiple times in an effort to de-escalate , but each time as they retreated , individuals in the crowd threw projectiles at officers and re-entered the street , ” the department wrote .
“ Officers made additional arrests.
” Cops reportedly recovered a drone in a traffic stop , as officers warned rioters to discontinue their gathering , MCSO wrote .
Law enforcement also seized a baton and a can of bear spray @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the release .
( RELATED : Portland Rioters Set Police Union Building Ablaze , Over A Dozen Arrested ) Portland was also the site of a rally by the Proud Boys , a right-wing group , and a state of emergency was declared ahead of their Saturday visit , according to The New York Times .
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience .
For licensing opportunities of our original content , please contact licensing @ dailycallernewsfoundation.org @

Portland rioters repeatedly tossed rocks, fireworks and other objects at officers on Saturday as unrest continued to fester in the city, police said.
Hundreds of demonstrators blocked traffic near a law enforcement precinct and hurled firecrackers, stones and soda cans at officers attempting to break up the disturbance, according to a Multnomah County Sheriff’s Office press release. Officers were also struck with metal ball bearings from slingshots, the release detailed.
The exact number of arrests made was not disclosed by MCSO, but one arrestee by the name of Michael Colten allegedly eluded law enforcement for two blocks while in zip-tie cuffs, according to the release.
“Officers attempted to disengage and leave the area multiple times in an effort to de-escalate, but each time as they retreated, individuals in the crowd threw projectiles at officers and re-entered the street,” the department wrote. “Officers made additional arrests.”
Cops reportedly recovered a drone in a traffic stop, as officers warned rioters to discontinue their gathering, MCSO wrote. Law enforcement also seized a baton and a can of bear spray after arresting a demonstrator, according to the release. (RELATED: Portland Rioters Set Police Union Building Ablaze, Over A Dozen Arrested)
After largely peaceful protests throughout the day Saturday, several hundred protesters gathered in Downtown Portland around 8:30 p.m. in Lownsdale and Chapman Square Parks. Press release: https://t.co/RqeN0yIzD0 — Multnomah Co Sheriff (@MultCoSO) September 27, 2020
Portland was also the site of a rally by the Proud Boys, a right-wing group, and a state of emergency was declared ahead of their Saturday visit, according to The New York Times.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.


thedailycaller--2020-09-27--‘A Lot Of Things That Are Constitutional Are Stupid’: Laurence Tribe Blasts Amy Coney Barrett Nomina

‘A Lot Of Things That Are Constitutional Are Stupid’: Laurence Tribe Blasts Amy Coney Barrett Nomination

Harvard Law School professor Laurence Tribe made it clear Sunday that he ’ s not in favor of Republicans ’ plan to go ahead with the confirmation of Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett .
Tribe joined a group discussion about Barrett ’ s nomination on “ Fox News Sunday , ” guest hosted by Fox News senior political analyst Brit Hume .
( RELATED : Harvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe Says Government Was Protecting America By Spying On Trump Campaign ) Tribe began by saying that he believed the nomination — and subsequent Senate confirmation hearings — should have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ We ’ ve never never jumped the gun this quickly .
It ’ s basically five weeks away .
People are already voting , ” Tribe explained .
“ The idea that we can ’ t wait a few days is ludicrous .
There ’ s no reason for it.
” Tribe went on to say that , while he thought highly of Barrett , he was most concerned about the rushed nomination .
“ They are not willing to wait because they really are nervous about what the American people believe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should be represented on the Supreme Court.
” Hume pressed Tribe then , asking whether he had found any support for his position in the Constitution .
“ I ’ m not suggesting it ’ s unconstitutional to go ahead , it ’ s perfectly constitutional , ” Tribe replied , adding , “ But a lot of things that are constitutional are stupid .
This is not a good idea .
”

Harvard Law School professor Laurence Tribe made it clear Sunday that he’s not in favor of Republicans’ plan to go ahead with the confirmation of Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett.
Tribe joined a group discussion about Barrett’s nomination on “Fox News Sunday,” guest hosted by Fox News senior political analyst Brit Hume. (RELATED: Harvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe Says Government Was Protecting America By Spying On Trump Campaign)
WATCH:
Tribe began by saying that he believed the nomination — and subsequent Senate confirmation hearings — should have waited until after the November election.
“We’ve never never jumped the gun this quickly. It’s basically five weeks away. People are already voting,” Tribe explained. “The idea that we can’t wait a few days is ludicrous. There’s no reason for it.”
Tribe went on to say that, while he thought highly of Barrett, he was most concerned about the rushed nomination. “They are not willing to wait because they really are nervous about what the American people believe the Constitution means and what they believe should be represented on the Supreme Court.”
Hume pressed Tribe then, asking whether he had found any support for his position in the Constitution.
“I’m not suggesting it’s unconstitutional to go ahead, it’s perfectly constitutional,” Tribe replied, adding, “But a lot of things that are constitutional are stupid. This is not a good idea.”


thedailycaller--2020-09-27--Biden Urges Republican Senators To ‘Step Back From The Brink’ On Barrett Confirmation

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden in a Sunday speech urged Republican senators to “ step back from the brink ” and rethink their positions on confirming President Donald Trump ’ s pick to replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg .
Trump introduced Judge Amy Coney Barrett on Saturday in a ceremony on the White House lawn .
While Democrats have admitted they have no procedural methods to stop a confirmation , they have called Republicans hypocritical for failing to confirm Merrick Garland in 2016 , declaring that it will hurt them at the ballot box .
“ Never before @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a Supreme Court justice been nominated and installed while a presidential election is already underway , ” Biden declared .
“ It defies every precedent , every expectation , of a nation where the people , the people are sovereign and the rule of law reigns.
” Biden accused Trump and Republicans of attempting to use the vacancy to do away with the Affordable Care Act .
“ President Trump sees a chance to fulfill his explicit mission , steal away the vital protections of the ACA from countless families who have come @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , their financial security , the lives of those they love , ” said Biden , who added that Barrett “ publicly criticized ” Chief Justice John Roberts ’ opinion upholding Obamacare .
The former vice president said the Senate “ has to stand strong for our democracy ” and “ not act on this nomination until the American people finish the process they ’ ve already begun , of selecting their president and their Congress.
” “ As I said before , if the people choose Donald Trump , then the Senate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a vote , ” he said .
“ If people do not choose Trump and choose me , President Trump ’ s nomination should be withdrawn.
” Calling the installment an “ abuse of power , ” Biden called on senators to “ take a step back from the brink , take off the blinders , the politics , for just one critical moment and stand up for the Constitution you swore to uphold.
” ( RELATED : Tom Cotton Spars With Jake Tapper Over Amy Coney Barrett , Merrick Garland Comparison ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , to put an end to the shattering of precedents that has thrown our nation into chaos under this president , ” he concluded .
“ Just because you have the power to do something doesn ’ t absolve you of your responsibility to do right by the American people .
”

Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden in a Sunday speech urged Republican senators to “step back from the brink” and rethink their positions on confirming President Donald Trump’s pick to replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Trump introduced Judge Amy Coney Barrett on Saturday in a ceremony on the White House lawn. While Democrats have admitted they have no procedural methods to stop a confirmation, they have called Republicans hypocritical for failing to confirm Merrick Garland in 2016, declaring that it will hurt them at the ballot box.
WATCH:
“Never before in our nation’s history has a Supreme Court justice been nominated and installed while a presidential election is already underway,” Biden declared. “It defies every precedent, every expectation, of a nation where the people, the people are sovereign and the rule of law reigns.”
Biden accused Trump and Republicans of attempting to use the vacancy to do away with the Affordable Care Act.
“President Trump sees a chance to fulfill his explicit mission, steal away the vital protections of the ACA from countless families who have come to rely on them for their health, their financial security, the lives of those they love,” said Biden, who added that Barrett “publicly criticized” Chief Justice John Roberts’ opinion upholding Obamacare.
The former vice president said the Senate “has to stand strong for our democracy” and “not act on this nomination until the American people finish the process they’ve already begun, of selecting their president and their Congress.”
“As I said before, if the people choose Donald Trump, then the Senate should give his nominee a hearing and a vote,” he said. “If people do not choose Trump and choose me, President Trump’s nomination should be withdrawn.”
Calling the installment an “abuse of power,” Biden called on senators to “take a step back from the brink, take off the blinders, the politics, for just one critical moment and stand up for the Constitution you swore to uphold.” (RELATED: Tom Cotton Spars With Jake Tapper Over Amy Coney Barrett, Merrick Garland Comparison)
“This is a time to de-escalate, to put an end to the shattering of precedents that has thrown our nation into chaos under this president,” he concluded. “Just because you have the power to do something doesn’t absolve you of your responsibility to do right by the American people.”


thedailycaller--2020-09-27--Clemson Is Ranked 1st In The Week 4 AP Top 25 Poll, Alabama Is 2nd

Clemson is still the top-ranked college football team in America in the latest AP Poll .
The Tigers were number one in the poll , and Alabama , Florida , Georgia and Notre Dame rounded out the top five .
( RELATED : David Hookstead Is The True King In The North When It Comes To College Football ) In a shocking development , Ohio State is sixth !
Yes , the Buckeyes are ranked sixth !
Obviously , I have no issue at all with Clemson being number one .
They ’ ve played two games so far , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ beef with Dabo Swinney and company being number one , and I think you ’ d have to be a moron to think they don ’ t have the best claim to the top spot .
I don ’ t even really care about Alabama being number two .
Again , they have a win under their belt and have a game already in the books .
However , Ohio State being ranked sixth is laughable .
They have to be the greatest sixth-ranked team ever .
We ’ re talking about a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ national title , and they ’ re number six .
Outrageous from the voters .
Wisconsin is 19th .
Am I happy about it ?
No , but it ’ s a weird year .
We ’ ll work our way up the board .
You best believe that .

Clemson is still the top-ranked college football team in America in the latest AP Poll.
The Tigers were number one in the poll, and Alabama, Florida, Georgia and Notre Dame rounded out the top five. (RELATED: David Hookstead Is The True King In The North When It Comes To College Football)
In a shocking development, Ohio State is sixth! Yes, the Buckeyes are ranked sixth!
View this post on Instagram A post shared by Clemson Football (@clemsonfb) on Sep 21, 2020 at 3:39pm PDT
Obviously, I have no issue at all with Clemson being number one. They’ve played two games so far, and dominated both.
I have no beef with Dabo Swinney and company being number one, and I think you’d have to be a moron to think they don’t have the best claim to the top spot.
I don’t even really care about Alabama being number two. Again, they have a win under their belt and have a game already in the books.
View this post on Instagram A post shared by Clemson Football (@clemsonfb) on Sep 20, 2020 at 8:57am PDT
However, Ohio State being ranked sixth is laughable. They have to be the greatest sixth-ranked team ever.
We’re talking about a squad that is expected to win the national title, and they’re number six. Outrageous from the voters.
View this post on Instagram A post shared by Ohio State Football (@ohiostatefb) on Sep 26, 2020 at 1:11pm PDT
Wisconsin is 19th. Am I happy about it? No, but it’s a weird year. We’ll work our way up the board. You best believe that.


thedailycaller--2020-09-27--Learn How To Harness SEO And Google Ads To Get Seen Online

Whether you run your own business or are building a blog as a side hustle , your online presence is crucial to your success .
While anyone can create virtual content these days , learning how to harness the power of important tools and concepts like Google Adwords and SEO can make a world of difference to your online game .
If you really want to make a splash online , the 9 courses in The Ultimate Google Ads & SEO Certification Bundle will show you everything you need to know .
From hands-on content to easy-to-follow lesson plans , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your experience level , how to use key concepts and practices to build a name for yourself online in every aspect .
Under the instruction of SEO expert Joshua George , you ’ ll learn just how crucial different forms of online marketing are to your business .
Throughout the program , you can expect to set up your first Google Ad , optimize your Google My Business listing , and get your website to rank on the first page of Google searches .
And that ’ s just the tip of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of SEO and the many ways you can use it to build your online reputation , you ’ ll find out what it takes to build a business in this booming industry .
From learning how to price your services to proven methods you can use to garner clients , everything you need to know about running a successful SEO business will be right at your fingertips .
Whether you ’ re simply revamping an already-existing business are making a name for yourself online for the very first time , The Ultimate Google @ @ @ @ @ @ @ every tool at your disposal to ensure optimal success online .
Normally , each course in The Ultimate Google Ads & SEO Certification Bundle is valued at $ 199 , but for a limited time , you can snag the entire program for just $ 50 bucks — that ’ s a whopping 97 % off its regular price .
Do you have your stay-at-home essentials ?
Here are some you may have missed .
Have a suggestion for a cool product or great deal that you think Daily Caller readers need to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at dealer @ dailycaller.com .
The Daily Caller is devoted to showing you things that you ’ ll like or find interesting .
We do have partnerships with affiliates , so The Daily Caller may get a small share of the revenue from any purchase .

Whether you run your own business or are building a blog as a side hustle, your online presence is crucial to your success. While anyone can create virtual content these days, learning how to harness the power of important tools and concepts like Google Adwords and SEO can make a world of difference to your online game.
If you really want to make a splash online, the 9 courses in The Ultimate Google Ads & SEO Certification Bundle will show you everything you need to know. From hands-on content to easy-to-follow lesson plans, each course shows you, no matter your experience level, how to use key concepts and practices to build a name for yourself online in every aspect.
Under the instruction of SEO expert Joshua George, you’ll learn just how crucial different forms of online marketing are to your business. Throughout the program, you can expect to set up your first Google Ad, optimize your Google My Business listing, and get your website to rank on the first page of Google searches. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg.
Once you get the hang of SEO and the many ways you can use it to build your online reputation, you’ll find out what it takes to build a business in this booming industry. From learning how to price your services to proven methods you can use to garner clients, everything you need to know about running a successful SEO business will be right at your fingertips.
Whether you’re simply revamping an already-existing business are making a name for yourself online for the very first time, The Ultimate Google Ads & SEO Certification Bundle gives you every tool at your disposal to ensure optimal success online.
Normally, each course in The Ultimate Google Ads & SEO Certification Bundle is valued at $199, but for a limited time, you can snag the entire program for just $50 bucks — that’s a whopping 97% off its regular price.
Price subject to change.
Do you have your stay-at-home essentials? Here are some you may have missed.
Have a suggestion for a cool product or great deal that you think Daily Caller readers need to know about? Email the Daily Dealer at dealer@dailycaller.com.
The Daily Caller is devoted to showing you things that you’ll like or find interesting. We do have partnerships with affiliates, so The Daily Caller may get a small share of the revenue from any purchase.


thedailycaller--2020-09-27--‘Intergalactic Freak Show’: Sen. John Kennedy Says He Can’t Stop Democrats From Bringing The Protest

‘Intergalactic Freak Show’: Sen. John Kennedy Says He Can’t Stop Democrats From Bringing The Protesters Back

Republican Louisiana Sen. John Kennedy said Sunday that he and the other Senate Republicans couldn ’ t stop Democrats from allowing protesters to disrupt Supreme Court confirmation hearings .
Kennedy joined Fox News senior political analyst Brit Hume , who was filling in for regular host Chris Wallace , on “ Fox News Sunday ” to discuss Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett and the likely fight in the Senate for her confirmation .
( RELATED : ‘ They Will Beat The Crap Out Of America ’ : John Kennedy Says Pelosi , Other Elites ‘ Can Strut Sitting Down @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of hypocrisy from both sides , asking whether there was a “ serious case on both sides of this issue of ‘ shoe on the other foot disease ’ ?
” Kennedy agreed , saying , “ In the history of ever , I don ’ t think there ’ s ever been another instance where when the Democrats were in charge they didn ’ t do what they wanted and when the Republicans were in charge they didn ’ t do what they wanted .
Consistent with the Constitution .
Right now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Republican Senate .
If the shoe were on the other foot , then I can assure you Senator Schumer would do what the Republicans are doing right now .
As I said the other day , if you don ’ t believe that , you know , you probably peaked in high school.
” Hume laughed , going on to ask whether Kennedy expected surprises and allegations to come out during the confirmation process , as was the case in 2018 with Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh .
“ If something like this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sure what you can do about it .
What can you do ?
” Hume asked .
“ If my Democratic friends want to turn it , you know , turn it into an intergalactic freak show and bring back the protesters with the genitalia-shaped headgear , I can ’ t stop them , ” Kennedy replied .
“ I ’ m going to do my job , ” Kennedy added .
“ I think she ’ s a good nominee , but my job is to advise and consent .
I ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or temperament , her judicial philosophy , her character .
I want to be assured that she doesn ’ t think justices are politicians in robes .
”

Republican Louisiana Sen. John Kennedy said Sunday that he and the other Senate Republicans couldn’t stop Democrats from allowing protesters to disrupt Supreme Court confirmation hearings.
Kennedy joined Fox News senior political analyst Brit Hume, who was filling in for regular host Chris Wallace, on “Fox News Sunday” to discuss Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett and the likely fight in the Senate for her confirmation. (RELATED: ‘They Will Beat The Crap Out Of America’: John Kennedy Says Pelosi, Other Elites ‘Can Strut Sitting Down’)
WATCH:
Hume began by addressing accusations of hypocrisy from both sides, asking whether there was a “serious case on both sides of this issue of ‘shoe on the other foot disease’?”
Kennedy agreed, saying, “In the history of ever, I don’t think there’s ever been another instance where when the Democrats were in charge they didn’t do what they wanted and when the Republicans were in charge they didn’t do what they wanted. Consistent with the Constitution. Right now we have a Republican president, a Republican Senate. If the shoe were on the other foot, then I can assure you Senator Schumer would do what the Republicans are doing right now. As I said the other day, if you don’t believe that, you know, you probably peaked in high school.”
Hume laughed, going on to ask whether Kennedy expected surprises and allegations to come out during the confirmation process, as was the case in 2018 with Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
“If something like this comes along. I’m not sure what you can do about it. What can you do?” Hume asked.
“If my Democratic friends want to turn it, you know, turn it into an intergalactic freak show and bring back the protesters with the genitalia-shaped headgear, I can’t stop them,” Kennedy replied.
“I’m going to do my job,” Kennedy added. “I think she’s a good nominee, but my job is to advise and consent. I’m going to probe her intellect, or temperament, her judicial philosophy, her character. I want to be assured that she doesn’t think justices are politicians in robes.”


thedailycaller--2020-09-27--Unfit To Print Episode 70: Debunking The Lies In The Breonna Taylor Case

Media stories about the Breonna Taylor case convinced people that police had shown up to the wrong apartment and executed @ @ @ @ @ The facts in the case tell a different story .
In this week ’ s @ @ @ @ @ why the police had a warrant to enter Taylor ’ s apartment and why they @ @ @ @ @ case is much more complicated than Black Lives Matter and their media enablers want you @ @ @ @ @ watching and check out past episodes of the podcast : Unfit To Print Episode 69 @ @ @ @ @ Cuties ’ Is Worse Than We Thought Unfit To Print Episode 67 : Kyle Rittenhouse @ @ @ @ @ ?
If you like this podcast , go check out Amber ’ s work at @ @ @ @ @ of their special anniversary offer .
Make sure you use the discount code AMBER to @ @ @ @ @ off !

Media stories about the Breonna Taylor case convinced people that police had shown up to the wrong apartment and executed an innocent young woman. The facts in the case tell a different story.
In this week’s episode, Amber Athey explains why the police had a warrant to enter Taylor’s apartment and why they fired their weapons. The case is much more complicated than Black Lives Matter and their media enablers want you to believe.
LISTEN:
LISTEN:
WATCH:
Thanks for watching and check out past episodes of the podcast:
Unfit To Print Episode 69: Netflix’s ‘Cuties’ Is Worse Than We Thought
Unfit To Print Episode 68: Pelosi Personifies Liberal Elitism With Salon Visit
Unfit To Print Episode 67: Kyle Rittenhouse, Murder Or Self Defense?
If you like this podcast, go check out Amber’s work at The Spectator and take advantage of their special anniversary offer. Make sure you use the discount code AMBER to get an additional 10% off!


thedailycaller--2020-09-27--Dwayne ‘The Rock’ Johnson Makes First Political Endorsement, Endorses Biden

Dwayne “ The Rock ” Johnson endorsed Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden Sunday marking the first time he has ever endorsed a politician at any level .
Johnson , Biden and Democratic vice presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris each announced the endorsement on social media early Sunday morning .
Johnson said that he has “ centrist ideologies ” in the endorsement video that he tweeted .
“ As a political independent & centrist , I ’ ve voted for both parties in the past .
In this critical presidential election , I ’ m endorsing @ JoeBiden & @ KamalaHarris @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also posted a video of a conversation they had about the importance of the upcoming election .
Johnson ’ s posts on Instagram and Twitter garnered millions of views almost immediately .
“ When you ’ re honest with a scenario and people who you care about , and obviously , we , you guys , all of us care deeply about our American people , ” Johnson told Biden and Harris .
( RELATED : Joe Biden Made A Huge Error While Talking About Coronavirus Deaths ) He continued : “ That @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ and ‘ honesty , ’ dealing with this , but it ’ s also , it leads right into making progress but through a humanity and how important that progress is , but through a humanity.
” Johnson , an actor and star World Wrestling Entertainment wrestler , has rarely weighed into political races .
However , he said he was “ seriously considering ” running for president in December 2017 on the Ellen Degeneres Show .
The wrestler and actor lambasted President Donald Trump in the aftermath of the death of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ police custody , in a June video message .
Johnson became the third-most favored candidate behind Biden and Trump following the video , Newsweek reported .
Johnson , a registered Independent who was previously a Republican , spoke at the 2000 Republican National Convention .
His speech focused on encouraging all Americans to vote but didn ’ t include an endorsement .
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience .
For licensing opportunities of our original content @ @ @ @ @ @ @

Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson endorsed Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden Sunday marking the first time he has ever endorsed a politician at any level.
Johnson, Biden and Democratic vice presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris each announced the endorsement on social media early Sunday morning. Johnson said that he has “centrist ideologies” in the endorsement video that he tweeted.
“As a political independent & centrist, I’ve voted for both parties in the past. In this critical presidential election, I’m endorsing @JoeBiden & @KamalaHarris,” Johnson tweeted.
He continued: “Progress takes courage, humanity, empathy, strength, KINDNESS & RESPECT.”
As a political independent & centrist, I’ve voted for both parties in the past. In this critical presidential election, I’m endorsing @JoeBiden & @KamalaHarris. Progress takes courage, humanity, empathy, strength, KINDNESS & RESPECT. We must ALL VOTE: https://t.co/rZi1mxh8DC pic.twitter.com/auLbc8xDBv — Dwayne Johnson (@TheRock) September 27, 2020
The trio also posted a video of a conversation they had about the importance of the upcoming election. Johnson’s posts on Instagram and Twitter garnered millions of views almost immediately.
“When you’re honest with a scenario and people who you care about, and obviously, we, you guys, all of us care deeply about our American people,” Johnson told Biden and Harris. (RELATED: Joe Biden Made A Huge Error While Talking About Coronavirus Deaths)
He continued: “That – you mentioned the word ‘respect’ and ‘honesty,’ dealing with this, but it’s also, it leads right into making progress but through a humanity and how important that progress is, but through a humanity.”
Johnson, an actor and star World Wrestling Entertainment wrestler, has rarely weighed into political races. However, he said he was “seriously considering” running for president in December 2017 on the Ellen Degeneres Show.
The wrestler and actor lambasted President Donald Trump in the aftermath of the death of George Floyd, who died in Minneapolis police custody, in a June video message. Johnson became the third-most favored candidate behind Biden and Trump following the video, Newsweek reported.
Johnson, a registered Independent who was previously a Republican, spoke at the 2000 Republican National Convention. His speech focused on encouraging all Americans to vote but didn’t include an endorsement.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.


thedailycaller--2020-09-27--Gov. Newsom Falsely Suggests Barrett Once Opposed Tipping Court’s Balance Of Power During An Electio

Gov. Newsom Falsely Suggests Barrett Once Opposed Tipping Court’s Balance Of Power During An Election Year

Democratic California Gov .
Gavin Newsom falsely suggested Saturday that United States Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett once railed against tipping the balance of power in the court during an election year .
“ Here is Judge Amy Coney Barrett explaining why it ’ s wrong to fill a SCOTUS vacancy during a presidential election year , ” Newsom , wrote in a since-deleted tweet that included a video of Barrett in a 2016 media interview discussing the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia , who died that year of a heart attack at his Texas hunting resort .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ and other outlets falsely reported that Barrett said it would be inappropriate to nominate a Supreme Court justice who would flip the court ’ s “ balance of power.
” ( RELATED : These Are The Attacks Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney Barrett Has Already Faced From Democrats ) Barrett did not say that such a move would be wrong or inappropriate , noting instead that past confirmations can not inform present day ones due to the current contentious nature of the confirmation process .
“ I gather that there have been six @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if you go back to the Civil War , of confirmations that happened during presidential election years , ” Barrett said , according to a Sept. 23 CBS report .
“ But I think the question is , what does this precedent establish ?
And I don ’ t think it establishes a rule for either side in the debate.
” She also discussed how replacing Scalia with a nominee by former President Barack Obama would change the court ’ s ideological makeup .
“ Moreover , Kennedy is a moderate Republican and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” she said , comparing the differences in Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy 1998 confirmation to the circumstances surrounding Scalia ’ s replacement .
Barrett added : “ We ’ re talking about Justice Scalia , you know , the staunchest conservative on the court , and we ’ re talking about him being replaced by someone who could dramatically flip the balance of power on the court .
It ’ s not a lateral move.
” Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ audience .
For licensing opportunities of our original content , please contact licensing @ dailycallernewsfoundation.org .

Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom falsely suggested Saturday that United States Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett once railed against tipping the balance of power in the court during an election year.
“Here is Judge Amy Coney Barrett explaining why it’s wrong to fill a SCOTUS vacancy during a presidential election year,” Newsom, wrote in a since-deleted tweet that included a video of Barrett in a 2016 media interview discussing the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who died that year of a heart attack at his Texas hunting resort.
Newsom’s tweet comes after Newsweek and other outlets falsely reported that Barrett said it would be inappropriate to nominate a Supreme Court justice who would flip the court’s “balance of power.” (RELATED: These Are The Attacks Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney Barrett Has Already Faced From Democrats)
Barrett did not say that such a move would be wrong or inappropriate, noting instead that past confirmations cannot inform present day ones due to the current contentious nature of the confirmation process.
“I gather that there have been six in the 20th century, and 11 if you go back to the Civil War, of confirmations that happened during presidential election years,” Barrett said, according to a Sept. 23 CBS report. “But I think the question is, what does this precedent establish? And I don’t think it establishes a rule for either side in the debate.” She also discussed how replacing Scalia with a nominee by former President Barack Obama would change the court’s ideological makeup. “Moreover, Kennedy is a moderate Republican and he replaced a moderate Republican, Powell,” she said, comparing the differences in Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy 1998 confirmation to the circumstances surrounding Scalia’s replacement. Barrett added: “We’re talking about Justice Scalia, you know, the staunchest conservative on the court, and we’re talking about him being replaced by someone who could dramatically flip the balance of power on the court. It’s not a lateral move.”
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.


thedailycaller--2020-09-27--Manchin Reiterates Stance Against Court Packing, Filibuster Abolishment Efforts: ‘The Senate Is So M

Manchin Reiterates Stance Against Court Packing, Filibuster Abolishment Efforts: ‘The Senate Is So Much Different’

Democratic West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin told CNN anchor Jake Tapper that he would oppose any efforts by other Democrats to fundamentally alter the Supreme Court or the Senate .
Some Democrats have expressed a desire to abolish the Senate filibuster , then “ pack ” the Supreme Court as a way to neutralize the potential confirmation of Judge Amy Coney Barrett and ram through their agenda if they retake the Senate .
“ Senator Chuck Schumer says no options are off the table next year , ” Tapper noted during Sunday morning ’ s “ State of the Union.
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ if Democrats win back the Senate , would you vote against any effort to expand the U.S. Supreme Court ?
” “ Jake , the thing about the Senate is so much different , ” Manchin said , reiterating a stance he took during a “ Fox & Friends ” interview last week .
“ Our intentions in how the Senate came about , the founding fathers was supposed to be the cooling sauce , if you will , the sauce that cooled off the hot tea .
We were supposed to work @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ve done that.
” “ We ’ ve set basically over the course of history how the Senate basically would be the most deliberate body looking and thinking and bringing people together , letting things calm down so we could have sensible , reasonable decisions , ” he continued .
“ Now , with that , I am not going to vote for anything that would cause basically not to be able to work in a bipartisan way.
” “ So you would vote against that ?
” Tapper asked .
“ That @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
I can ’ t support that , ” Manchin responded .
“ The whole premise of this Senate , in this democracy , the experiment of ours , is just certain decency and social order that basically has been expected from us and especially from the Senate from the beginning of our government.
” Manchin decried the notion of doing away with the Senate ’ s tradition of giving a voice to the political minority .
( RELATED : McConnell Says Eliminating Filibuster Would ‘ Disfigure The Senate ’ ) “ Now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ going to say , oh , you don ’ t have to talk anymore , you just have to have 51 votes and forget about the minority ?
” he asked .
“ Well , the minority has always played an important part in the Senate ’ s proceedings because it was supposed to basically take our consideration if you ’ re in the minority , you still have input , you ’ re still represented and you ’ re still being deliberative enough to bring common sense together , to make sure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ angle we can for American justice.
” The West Virginia senator reiterated his intentions to not vote to confirm Judge Amy Coney Barrett , citing the timing , but did tell Tapper he would meet with her if asked .

Democratic West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin told CNN anchor Jake Tapper that he would oppose any efforts by other Democrats to fundamentally alter the Supreme Court or the Senate.
Some Democrats have expressed a desire to abolish the Senate filibuster, then “pack” the Supreme Court as a way to neutralize the potential confirmation of Judge Amy Coney Barrett and ram through their agenda if they retake the Senate.
“Senator Chuck Schumer says no options are off the table next year,” Tapper noted during Sunday morning’s “State of the Union.” “Just to be clear, if Democrats win back the Senate, would you vote against any effort to expand the U.S. Supreme Court?”
WATCH:
“Jake, the thing about the Senate is so much different,” Manchin said, reiterating a stance he took during a “Fox & Friends” interview last week. “Our intentions in how the Senate came about, the founding fathers was supposed to be the cooling sauce, if you will, the sauce that cooled off the hot tea. We were supposed to work in a bipartisan, and we’ve done that.”
“We’ve set basically over the course of history how the Senate basically would be the most deliberate body looking and thinking and bringing people together, letting things calm down so we could have sensible, reasonable decisions,” he continued. “Now, with that, I am not going to vote for anything that would cause basically not to be able to work in a bipartisan way.”
“So you would vote against that?” Tapper asked.
“That is not something that I would support. I can’t support that,” Manchin responded. “The whole premise of this Senate, in this democracy, the experiment of ours, is just certain decency and social order that basically has been expected from us and especially from the Senate from the beginning of our government.”
Manchin decried the notion of doing away with the Senate’s tradition of giving a voice to the political minority. (RELATED: McConnell Says Eliminating Filibuster Would ‘Disfigure The Senate’)
“Now all of a sudden they’re going to say, oh, you don’t have to talk anymore, you just have to have 51 votes and forget about the minority?” he asked. “Well, the minority has always played an important part in the Senate’s proceedings because it was supposed to basically take our consideration if you’re in the minority, you still have input, you’re still represented and you’re still being deliberative enough to bring common sense together, to make sure that we’ve looked at every angle we can for American justice.”
The West Virginia senator reiterated his intentions to not vote to confirm Judge Amy Coney Barrett, citing the timing, but did tell Tapper he would meet with her if asked.


thedailycaller--2020-09-27--Tom Cotton Spars With Jake Tapper Over Amy Coney Barrett, Merrick Garland Comparison

Republican Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton and CNN anchor Jake Tapper debated the differences between Supreme Court nominees Amy Coney Barrett and Merrick Garland during a Sunday morning “ State of the Union ” interview .
The segment began with Tapper playing a clip of Cotton appealing to the concept of giving voters “ a chance to weigh in on the makeup of the Supreme Court ” in 2016 .
“ So that clip from the Senate floor in March 2016 was eight months before the 2016 election , ” Tapper said .
“ Right now we ’ re five weeks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it so important back then to let the voters have a chance to weigh in on the makeup of the Supreme Court , but today it ’ s not ?
” “ Yeah , Jake , it ’ s not so much about the timing but how the voters had spoken , ” Cotton responded .
“ They had delivered a split decision to the president and the Senate at the time .
They elected Barack Obama in 2012 .
They elected me and a lot of other Republicans in 2014 as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on his far left judicial nominees .
That ’ s not the case now.
” “ In 2018 we had about as clear a national referendum as we could , ” he continued .
“ Just one month after the Justice Kavanaugh confirmation in which Democrats threw everything but the kitchen sink at him , they didn ’ t just re-elect a Republican majority , they expanded a Republican majority.
” Cotton pointed out that four Democrats who voted against Kavanaugh were defeated while the one Democrat who voted for him , West @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reelected .
“ That is true that that ’ s what happened in the Senate , but in the House the American people gave it to the Democrats by a fairly overwhelming margin , ” Tapper said before playing a clip of Cotton warning of the ideological differences between the late Justice Antonin Scalia and Garland .
“ Again , that ideological difference certainly exists between the late Justice Ginsburg and Judge Barrett , ” Tapper noted .
“ It ’ s perhaps even more of a stark difference , frankly , considering @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , to apply your 2016 principles , which I ’ m not sure are any longer operative , shouldn ’ t the American people get the chance to weigh in ?
Polls indicate that that ’ s what the public thinks , that whoever ’ s elected November 3rd should pick the Supreme Court justice.
” Cotton against referenced the “ split decision ” in 2016 .
( RELATED : Ben Sasse Predicts Democrats Will ‘ Throw Crap At The Wall , See What Sticks ’ To Try And Discredit Supreme Court Nominee @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the brakes on the Obama agenda including his traditional nominees , ” he said .
“ Now we are operating under the clear mandate we received in 2018 .
”

Republican Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton and CNN anchor Jake Tapper debated the differences between Supreme Court nominees Amy Coney Barrett and Merrick Garland during a Sunday morning “State of the Union” interview.
The segment began with Tapper playing a clip of Cotton appealing to the concept of giving voters “a chance to weigh in on the makeup of the Supreme Court” in 2016.
“So that clip from the Senate floor in March 2016 was eight months before the 2016 election,” Tapper said. “Right now we’re five weeks out from the election. Why was it so important back then to let the voters have a chance to weigh in on the makeup of the Supreme Court, but today it’s not?”
WATCH:
“Yeah, Jake, it’s not so much about the timing but how the voters had spoken,” Cotton responded. “They had delivered a split decision to the president and the Senate at the time. They elected Barack Obama in 2012. They elected me and a lot of other Republicans in 2014 as a break in the agenda, most notably on his far left judicial nominees. That’s not the case now.”
“In 2018 we had about as clear a national referendum as we could,” he continued. “Just one month after the Justice Kavanaugh confirmation in which Democrats threw everything but the kitchen sink at him, they didn’t just re-elect a Republican majority, they expanded a Republican majority.”
Cotton pointed out that four Democrats who voted against Kavanaugh were defeated while the one Democrat who voted for him, West Virginia’s Joe Manchin, was reelected.
“That is true that that’s what happened in the Senate, but in the House the American people gave it to the Democrats by a fairly overwhelming margin,” Tapper said before playing a clip of Cotton warning of the ideological differences between the late Justice Antonin Scalia and Garland.
“Again, that ideological difference certainly exists between the late Justice Ginsburg and Judge Barrett,” Tapper noted. “It’s perhaps even more of a stark difference, frankly, considering Merrick Garland was center-left. So again, to apply your 2016 principles, which I’m not sure are any longer operative, shouldn’t the American people get the chance to weigh in? Polls indicate that that’s what the public thinks, that whoever’s elected November 3rd should pick the Supreme Court justice.”
Cotton against referenced the “split decision” in 2016. (RELATED: Ben Sasse Predicts Democrats Will ‘Throw Crap At The Wall, See What Sticks’ To Try And Discredit Supreme Court Nominee)
“In 2014 they helped put the brakes on the Obama agenda including his traditional nominees,” he said. “Now we are operating under the clear mandate we received in 2018.”


thedailycaller--2020-09-28--OLIVER: Debate Questions For Joe Biden

OLIVER: Debate Questions For Joe Biden

It is reasonably safe now to assume that Joe Biden won ’ t be able to duck the presidential debate scheduled for September 29 , but smart money wouldn ’ t bet the ranch — or the Supreme Court — on it .
Six topics have been selected , but may change with breaking news .
The topics are : the Trump and Biden Records , the Supreme Court , Covid-19 , the Economy , Race and Violence in Our Cities , and the Integrity of the Election .
Here are five questions that should be asked .
And if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , they should be asked by Donald Trump .
Once the candidates get on stage , it becomes a free-for-all , whatever the agreed “ rules ” are .
Trump is good at free-for-alls .
Actually , Trump is best at them .
He could work these questions into his answers .
Question 1 : ( This question really comes from Kimberly Klacik , the Republican candidate for Maryland ’ s 7th congressional district , Baltimore . )
If you think this country is systemically racist , why didn ’ t you say @ @ @ @ @ @ @ years that you ’ ve been in Washington — far longer than Trump has been there ?
Is there any record of you saying , during eight years as vice president , that this country is systemically racist ?
If not , why not ?
And if not , don ’ t you shoulder some of the blame for the country ’ s systemic racism ?
And in that case why do you keep blaming President Trump ?
Question 2 : You said Trump didn ’ t take the Chinese Flu seriously .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the country from China in February , you said the policy was “ xenophobic.
” And then again , in May , you said , “ The pandemic has unleashed familiar forces of hate , fear , and xenophobia .
.
.
.
” Why did you say that ?
Back in February , would you have allowed people to continue to come to the US from China ?
If yes , wouldn ’ t that have been irresponsible ?
If no , why aren ’ t you as guilty of xenophobia as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 3 : We know that states suffering the highest unemployment and job losses as a result of the Chinese Flu are run by Democrats who instituted draconian lockdown measures .
We also know cities with the highest crime rates are also run by Democrats — some have been run by Democrats for decades .
In the past few months we ’ ve seen violent rioting almost nightly in major cities ( also run by Democrats ) across America .
It looks as if Democrat politicians are either unable or unwilling to deal effectively @ @ @ @ @ @ @ law and order crisis .
Why should anyone expect you to be different ?
And why , at the Democrat Convention , was not a single reference made to the violence that has been sweeping the country ?
Question 4 : This question comes from Richard V. Reeves and Christopher Pulliam of The New York Times , who wrote that you claim to be fighting for “ the young people who have known only an America of rising inequity and shrinking opportunity.
” And yet , you ’ re pushing a $ 137 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would be delivered to the mega-rich by eliminating the $ 10,000 cap on deductions for state and local taxes .
You accuse Trump of cutting taxes for the rich — but that ’ s exactly what your proposal does .
Explain .
Question 5 is about the mental capacity of the candidates , which relates directly to integrity of the election : Questions have been raised about your mental capacity .
Here are four statements you have made recently , which , it is fair to say , either make no sense or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , “ COVID has taken this year , just since the outbreak , has taken more than 100 years .
Look , the lives , when you think about it , more lives this year than any other year for the past 100 years.
” • You said , “ A hundred and fifty million people have been killed since 2007 when Bernie voted to exempt the gun manufacturers from liability , more than all the wars , including Vietnam from that point on.
” • You said , “ We hold these @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and women are created , by the , you know , you know the thing.
” • You said , “ US Covid infected military , uh , excuse me , US Covid infected in America , six thousand three hundred forty thousand seven hundred , US Covid deaths , one thousand one hundred eighty nine thousand five hundred and six , military Covid infected , one hundred eighteen thousand nine hundred eighty four , military Covid deaths , six thousand one hundred fourteen.
” A charitable description of those statements might be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ charitable description would be they are gibberish .
Why shouldn ’ t the American people worry about the mental capacity of anyone who made those statements ?
If the reporters won ’ t ask the tough questions , Trump should , and can in his closing statement .
That will be a debate worth watching .
Daniel Oliver is Chairman of the Board of the Education and Research Institute and a Director of Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy in San Francisco .
In addition to serving as Chairman of the Federal Trade @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Executive Editor and subsequently Chairman of the Board of William F. Buckley Jr. ’ s National Review .

It is reasonably safe now to assume that Joe Biden won’t be able to duck the presidential debate scheduled for September 29, but smart money wouldn’t bet the ranch — or the Supreme Court — on it. Six topics have been selected, but may change with breaking news. The topics are: the Trump and Biden Records, the Supreme Court, Covid-19, the Economy, Race and Violence in Our Cities, and the Integrity of the Election.
Here are five questions that should be asked. And if they are not asked by the media, they should be asked by Donald Trump. Once the candidates get on stage, it becomes a free-for-all, whatever the agreed “rules” are. Trump is good at free-for-alls. Actually, Trump is best at them. He could work these questions into his answers.
Question 1: (This question really comes from Kimberly Klacik, the Republican candidate for Maryland’s 7th congressional district, Baltimore.) If you think this country is systemically racist, why didn’t you say anything about it during the last 48 years that you’ve been in Washington — far longer than Trump has been there? Is there any record of you saying, during eight years as vice president, that this country is systemically racist? If not, why not? And if not, don’t you shoulder some of the blame for the country’s systemic racism? And in that case why do you keep blaming President Trump?
Question 2: You said Trump didn’t take the Chinese Flu seriously. Yet when he stopped people from entering the country from China in February, you said the policy was “xenophobic.” And then again, in May, you said, “The pandemic has unleashed familiar forces of hate, fear, and xenophobia . . . .” Why did you say that? Back in February, would you have allowed people to continue to come to the US from China? If yes, wouldn’t that have been irresponsible? If no, why aren’t you as guilty of xenophobia as you claim President Trump is?
Question 3: We know that states suffering the highest unemployment and job losses as a result of the Chinese Flu are run by Democrats who instituted draconian lockdown measures. We also know cities with the highest crime rates are also run by Democrats — some have been run by Democrats for decades. In the past few months we’ve seen violent rioting almost nightly in major cities (also run by Democrats) across America. It looks as if Democrat politicians are either unable or unwilling to deal effectively with either a health crisis or a law and order crisis. Why should anyone expect you to be different? And why, at the Democrat Convention, was not a single reference made to the violence that has been sweeping the country?
Question 4: This question comes from Richard V. Reeves and Christopher Pulliam of The New York Times, who wrote that you claim to be fighting for “the young people who have known only an America of rising inequity and shrinking opportunity.” And yet, you’re pushing a $137 billion tax cut — a cut that would be delivered to the mega-rich by eliminating the $10,000 cap on deductions for state and local taxes. You accuse Trump of cutting taxes for the rich — but that’s exactly what your proposal does. Explain.
Question 5 is about the mental capacity of the candidates, which relates directly to integrity of the election: Questions have been raised about your mental capacity. Here are four statements you have made recently, which, it is fair to say, either make no sense or display extraordinary confusion:
You said, “COVID has taken this year, just since the outbreak, has taken more than 100 years. Look, the lives, when you think about it, more lives this year than any other year for the past 100 years.” You said, “A hundred and fifty million people have been killed since 2007 when Bernie voted to exempt the gun manufacturers from liability, more than all the wars, including Vietnam from that point on.” You said, “We hold these truths to be self-evident. All men and women are created, by the, you know, you know the thing.” You said, “US Covid infected military, uh, excuse me, US Covid infected in America, six thousand three hundred forty thousand seven hundred, US Covid deaths, one thousand one hundred eighty nine thousand five hundred and six, military Covid infected, one hundred eighteen thousand nine hundred eighty four, military Covid deaths, six thousand one hundred fourteen.”
A charitable description of those statements might be that they are confused. A less charitable description would be they are gibberish. Why shouldn’t the American people worry about the mental capacity of anyone who made those statements?
If the reporters won’t ask the tough questions, Trump should, and can in his closing statement. That will be a debate worth watching.
Daniel Oliver is Chairman of the Board of the Education and Research Institute and a Director of Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy in San Francisco. In addition to serving as Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission under President Reagan, he was Executive Editor and subsequently Chairman of the Board of William F. Buckley Jr.’s National Review.
Email Daniel Oliver at Daniel.Oliver@TheCandidAmerican.com.