greatgameindia--2020-09-21--Names Of Every Jeffrey Epstein Lolita Express Passenger To Be Made Public

The Attorney General for the US Virgin Islands , where Israeli spy Jeffrey Epstein had a home , has demanded logs for his four helicopters and three planes , from 1998 until he was suicided last year .
Names of every passenger to have flown on Jeffrey Epstein ’ s Lolita Express are to be revealed sparking panic among his powerful friends .
Denise George has filed a lawsuit against Epstein ’ s estate , alleging 22 counts , including aggravated rape , child abuse and neglect , human trafficking , forced labour and prostitution .
As well as the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ any “ complaints or reports of potentially suspicious conduct ” and any personal notes the pilots made .
The subpoena demands the names and contact details of anyone who worked for the pilots or who “ interacted with or observed ” Jeffrey Epstein or any passengers associated with him .
Pilot David Rodgers provided logs in 2009 showing Prince Andrew , Bill Clinton , Kevin Spacey and Naomi Campbell were among those who flew on Epstein ’ s “ Lolita express ” jet .
Lawyers for the victims say the 2009 logs did @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Larry Visoski , who flew for Epstein for more than 25 years .
In July , in unsealed court documents , eyewitness confirmed former President Bill Clinton was seen with two young girls on Jeffrey Epstein ’ s “ pedophile island.
” The documents were unsealed as a result of the two-year long case to unseal documents involving sex trafficking lawsuit filed by Mike Cernovich .
FBI agent Jason Richards knew about the victim since atleast 2014 .
The minor victim was asking the FBI for the evidence ( photos and videos ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prosecute her civil case .
Yet , no action was taken .
Meanwhile , the husband and son of Judge Esther Salas who was assigned Jeffrey Epstein linked money-laundering case just four days prior got shot recently .
All of Jeffrey Epstein ’ s high-profile clients maintained by his partner Ghislaine Maxwell , now arrested by the FBI are contained in a Little Black Book which include Mike Bloomberg , Richard Branson , top US politicians , British Royals like Prince Charles , the Rothschilds , George Soros and the Queen of England @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who ran a pedophile sex-trafficking blackmail network for high-level individuals in position of power .
He is widely believed to have been suicided while in jail .
With the dramatic arrest of his partner Ghislaine Maxwell , who possesses the blackmail sex-tapes , a lot of prominent individuals are at risk of being exposed .
Send in your tips and submissions by filling out this form or write to us directly at the email provided .
Join us on WhatsApp for more intel and updates .

The Attorney General for the US Virgin Islands, where Israeli spy Jeffrey Epstein had a home, has demanded logs for his four helicopters and three planes, from 1998 until he was suicided last year. Names of every passenger to have flown on Jeffrey Epstein’s Lolita Express are to be revealed sparking panic among his powerful friends.
Must Watch: Would you live on 3D Printed Mars for a year for $60,000?
Denise George has filed a lawsuit against Epstein’s estate, alleging 22 counts, including aggravated rape, child abuse and neglect, human trafficking, forced labour and prostitution.
As well as the passenger lists, Ms George is seeking any “complaints or reports of potentially suspicious conduct” and any personal notes the pilots made.
The subpoena demands the names and contact details of anyone who worked for the pilots or who “interacted with or observed” Jeffrey Epstein or any passengers associated with him.
Here are the details of the high-profile Jeffrey Epstein Deutsche Bank case that was assigned to Judge Esther Salas for which her husband and son were shot. COURT: D.N.J.
TRACK DOCKET: No. 20-cv-08978
JUDGE: Esther Salas
COMPANY INFO: Deutsche Bank AGhttps://t.co/p0NfNHiTdJ — GreatGameIndia (@GreatGameIndia) July 20, 2020
Pilot David Rodgers provided logs in 2009 showing Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, Kevin Spacey and Naomi Campbell were among those who flew on Epstein’s “Lolita express” jet.
Subscribe to GreatGameIndia
Lawyers for the victims say the 2009 logs did not include flights made by chief pilot Larry Visoski, who flew for Epstein for more than 25 years.
A legal source told The Mirror:
“The records that have been subpoenaed will make the ones Rodgers provided look like a Post-It note. There is panic among many of the rich and famous.”
Here is the painting of the former President of America Bill Clinton found inside pedophile kingpin and Israeli spy Jeffrey Epstein's house. pic.twitter.com/inBd2sAtur — GreatGameIndia (@GreatGameIndia) July 3, 2020
In July, in unsealed court documents, eyewitness confirmed former President Bill Clinton was seen with two young girls on Jeffrey Epstein’s “pedophile island.” The documents were unsealed as a result of the two-year long case to unseal documents involving sex trafficking lawsuit filed by Mike Cernovich.
FBI agent Jason Richards knew about the victim since atleast 2014.
The minor victim was asking the FBI for the evidence (photos and videos) they seized from Epstein so she could prosecute her civil case. Yet, no action was taken.
Meanwhile, the husband and son of Judge Esther Salas who was assigned Jeffrey Epstein linked money-laundering case just four days prior got shot recently.
All of Jeffrey Epstein’s high-profile clients maintained by his partner Ghislaine Maxwell, now arrested by the FBI are contained in a Little Black Book which include Mike Bloomberg, Richard Branson, top US politicians, British Royals like Prince Charles, the Rothschilds, George Soros and the Queen of England herself.
Epstein was an Israeli spy who ran a pedophile sex-trafficking blackmail network for high-level individuals in position of power. He is widely believed to have been suicided while in jail. With the dramatic arrest of his partner Ghislaine Maxwell, who possesses the blackmail sex-tapes, a lot of prominent individuals are at risk of being exposed.
Send in your tips and submissions by filling out this form or write to us directly at the email provided. Join us on WhatsApp for more intel and updates.
Support GreatGameIndia GreatGameIndia is being actively targeted by powerful forces who do not wish us to survive. Your contribution, however small help us keep afloat. We accept voluntary payment for the content available for free on this website via UPI, PayPal and Bitcoin.


greatgameindia--2020-09-23--COVID-19 Is Bioterrorism – New Book By Indian Biological Weapons Expert Claims

A new book by Senior Indian Police officer and Biological Weapons expert claims COVID-19 is Bioterrorism .
Dr Sharad S. Chauhan is a decorated Indian Police Service ( IPS ) officer awarded the Prime Minister ’ s baton and the Home Minister ’ s Revolver .
He is also a Gold Medallist MBBS Doctor from Delhi University with a PhD in Bioterrorism .
He also authored the book Biological Weapons .
The book titled COVID-19 – Opportunistic Bioterrorism ?
A Virus from China set to Change World History , traverses the early stages of the COVID-19 epidemic in China with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the coronavirus , the timeline of events and administrative reactions of the Chinese to the virus .
The book examines this in the backdrop of the experiments conducted by Chinese researchers on SARS like coronaviruses for more than a decade and the state of the Chinese economy preceding the outbreak .
In the process of doing so the book defines the concept of opportunistic bioterrorism for the first time .
The author relies on scientific and open source intelligence to scrutinize evidence with the expertise gained as a medical graduate and a police @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in China near the end of 2019 is now a global calamity .
The rampaging COVID-19 pandemic has changed the world as never before , the great wars and pandemics of past included .
The strategic , geopolitical and geo-economics consequences of COVID-19 are slowly unfolding .
The virus from China is set to change the world .
The book also raises 101 critical questions on COVID-19 .
The questionnaire appended is a judicious mix of both clarifying and probing questions and valuable in and of itself , irrespective of the answer to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The controversial issue pertaining to the laboratory origins of the virus is kept out of the main text as an Appendix .
The book is a single source reference for all contentious issues relating to the COVID 19 pandemic .
For latest updates on the outbreak check out our Coronavirus Coverage .
Send in your tips and submissions by filling out this form or write to us directly at the email provided .
Join us on WhatsApp for more intel and updates .
GreatGameIndia is a journal on Geopolitics and International Relations .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ is facing in our exclusive book India in Cognitive Dissonance .
Past magazine issues can be accessed from the Archives section .

A new book by Senior Indian Police officer and Biological Weapons expert claims COVID-19 is Bioterrorism. Dr Sharad S. Chauhan is a decorated Indian Police Service (IPS) officer awarded the Prime Minister’s baton and the Home Minister’s Revolver. He is also a Gold Medallist MBBS Doctor from Delhi University with a PhD in Bioterrorism. He also authored the book Biological Weapons.
Must Watch: Would you live on 3D Printed Mars for a year for $60,000?
The book titled COVID-19 – Opportunistic Bioterrorism? A Virus from China set to Change World History, traverses the early stages of the COVID-19 epidemic in China with a special emphasis on the origins of the coronavirus, the timeline of events and administrative reactions of the Chinese to the virus. The book examines this in the backdrop of the experiments conducted by Chinese researchers on SARS like coronaviruses for more than a decade and the state of the Chinese economy preceding the outbreak.
EXPOSED Italian state media Rai – Radiotelevisione Italiana in 2015 exposed Chinese Biological Experiments with #Coronavirus to make it infect humans.https://t.co/oMc63Pcbxd — GreatGameIndia (@GreatGameIndia) March 30, 2020
In the process of doing so the book defines the concept of opportunistic bioterrorism for the first time. The author relies on scientific and open source intelligence to scrutinize evidence with the expertise gained as a medical graduate and a police officer.
What started as an outbreak in China near the end of 2019 is now a global calamity. The rampaging COVID-19 pandemic has changed the world as never before, the great wars and pandemics of past included. The strategic, geopolitical and geo-economics consequences of COVID-19 are slowly unfolding. The virus from China is set to change the world.
EXCLUSIVE#Coronavirus Bioweapon Thread How China Stole Coronavirus From Canada And Weaponized Ithttps://t.co/tc7W2DrmAA — GreatGameIndia (@GreatGameIndia) January 27, 2020
The book also raises 101 critical questions on COVID-19. The questionnaire appended is a judicious mix of both clarifying and probing questions and valuable in and of itself, irrespective of the answer to facilitate effective deliberation on the topic. The controversial issue pertaining to the laboratory origins of the virus is kept out of the main text as an Appendix. The book is a single source reference for all contentious issues relating to the COVID 19 pandemic.
Subscribe to GreatGameIndia
For latest updates on the outbreak check out our Coronavirus Coverage.
Send in your tips and submissions by filling out this form or write to us directly at the email provided. Join us on WhatsApp for more intel and updates.
GreatGameIndia is a journal on Geopolitics and International Relations. Get to know the Geopolitical threats India is facing in our exclusive book India in Cognitive Dissonance. Past magazine issues can be accessed from the Archives section.


greatgameindia--2020-09-24--Belgium Health Experts Demand Investigation Of WHO For Faking Coronavirus Pandemic

Medical Doctors and Health Professionals of Belgium have written an open letter to authorities demanding the investigation of WHO for creating coronavirus infodemic faking the pandemic .
The following letter has made an impact on public health authorities not only in Belgium but around the world .
The text could pertain to any case in which states locked down their citizens rather than allow people freedom and permit medical professionals to bear the primary job of disease mitigation .
Earlier , it was revealed that a Pornstar and a Sci-Fi Writer influenced WHO policies on Hydroxychloroquine with fake data .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ come under sharp scrutiny for the integrity of its key studies that were published in some of the world ’ s most prestigious medical journals .
World Health Organization and several national governments changed their COVID-19 policies and treatment based on the faulty data provided by the company with a pornstar and a sci-fi writer on their payroll .
An exclusive report by GreatGameIndia revealed how in 2009 WHO prematurely declared ‘ swine flu ’ a pandemic which resulted in a surge of vaccine orders .
The rich and affluent nations were quick @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Ironically , most deaths occurred not in Europe but in Africa and Southeast Asia .
In his controversial book renowned author Stuart Blume discloses that many of the most influential advisers , at both World Health Organisation ( WHO ) and national levels , are paid consultants to the vaccine industry raising a very serious question – that the WHO might be working for the vaccine industry ’ s interests and not the people – the reason why 10 years ago WHO faked a pandemic .
We , Belgian doctors and health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ concern about the evolution of the situation in the recent months surrounding the outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 virus .
We call on politicians to be independently and critically informed in the decision-making process and in the compulsory implementation of corona-measures .
We ask for an open debate , where all experts are represented without any form of censorship .
After the initial panic surrounding covid-19 , the objective facts now show a completely different picture – there is no medical justification for any emergency policy anymore .
The current crisis management has become @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it does any good .
We call for an end to all measures and ask for an immediate restoration of our normal democratic governance and legal structures and of all our civil liberties .
‘ A cure must not be worse than the problem ’ is a thesis that is more relevant than ever in the current situation .
We note , however , that the collateral damage now being caused to the population will have a greater impact in the short and long term on all sections of the population than the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ corona .
In our opinion , the current corona measures and the strict penalties for non-compliance with them are contrary to the values formulated by the Belgian Supreme Health Council , which , until recently , as the health authority , has always ensured quality medicine in our country : “ Science – Expertise – Quality – Impartiality – Independence – Transparency ” .
1 We believe that the policy has introduced mandatory measures that are not sufficiently scientifically based , unilaterally directed , and that there is not enough space in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ different views and opinions are heard .
In addition , each municipality and province now has the authorisation to add its own measures , whether well-founded or not .
Moreover , the strict repressive policy on corona strongly contrasts with the government ’ s minimal policy when it comes to disease prevention , strengthening our own immune system through a healthy lifestyle , optimal care with attention for the individual and investment in care personnel.2 In 1948 , the WHO defined health as follows : ‘ Health is a state of complete physical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ merely the absence of disease or other physical impairment ’ .3 Health , therefore , is a broad concept that goes beyond the physical and also relates to the emotional and social well-being of the individual .
Belgium also has a duty , from the point of view of subscribing to fundamental human rights , to include these human rights in its decision-making when it comes to measures taken in the context of public health .
4 The current global measures taken to combat SARS-CoV-2 violate to a large extent this view of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ compulsory wearing of a mask ( also in open air and during sporting activities , and in some municipalities even when there are no other people in the vicinity ) , physical distancing , social isolation , compulsory quarantine for some groups and hygiene measures .
The predicted pandemic with millions of deaths At the beginning of the pandemic , the measures were understandable and widely supported , even if there were differences in implementation in the countries around us .
The WHO originally predicted a pandemic that would claim 3.4 % victims @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and a highly contagious virus for which no treatment or vaccine was available .
This would put unprecedented pressure on the intensive care units ( ICUs ) of our hospitals .
This led to a global alarm situation , never seen in the history of mankind : “ flatten the curve ” was represented by a lockdown that shut down the entire society and economy and quarantined healthy people .
Social distancing became the new normal in anticipation of a rescue vaccine .
Gradually , the alarm bell was sounded from many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ completely different reality .
5 6 The course of covid-19 followed the course of a normal wave of infection similar to a flu season .
As every year , we see a mix of flu viruses following the curve : first the rhinoviruses , then the influenza A and B viruses , followed by the coronaviruses .
There is nothing different from what we normally see .
The use of the non-specific PCR test , which produces many false positives , showed an exponential picture .
This test was rushed through with an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The creator expressly warned that this test was intended for research and not for diagnostics.7 The PCR test works with cycles of amplification of genetic material – a piece of genome is amplified each time .
Any contamination ( e.g .
other viruses , debris from old virus genomes ) can possibly result in false positives.8 The test does not measure how many viruses are present in the sample .
A real viral infection means a massive presence of viruses , the so-called virus load .
If someone tests positive , this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ actually clinically infected , is ill or is going to become ill. Koch ’ s postulate was not fulfilled ( “ The pure agent found in a patient with complaints can provoke the same complaints in a healthy person ” ) .
Since a positive PCR test does not automatically indicate active infection or infectivity , this does not justify the social measures taken , which are based solely on these tests .
9 10 If we compare the waves of infection in countries with strict lockdown policies to countries that did not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) , we see similar curves .
So there is no link between the imposed lockdown and the course of the infection .
Lockdown has not led to a lower mortality rate .
If we look at the date of application of the imposed lockdowns we see that the lockdowns were set after the peak was already over and the number of cases decreasing .
The drop was therefore not the result of the taken measures .
11 As every year , it seems that climatic conditions ( weather , temperature and humidity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to reduce the wave of infection .
For thousands of years , the human body has been exposed daily to moisture and droplets containing infectious microorganisms ( viruses , bacteria and fungi ) .
The penetration of these microorganisms is prevented by an advanced defence mechanism – the immune system .
A strong immune system relies on normal daily exposure to these microbial influences .
Overly hygienic measures have a detrimental effect on our immunity .
12 13 Only people with a weak or faulty immune system should be protected by extensive hygiene @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the autumn ( in combination with covid-19 ) and a possible decrease in natural resilience may lead to further casualties .
Our immune system consists of two parts : a congenital , non-specific immune system and an adaptive immune system .
The non-specific immune system forms a first barrier : skin , saliva , gastric juice , intestinal mucus , vibratory hair cells , commensal flora , … and prevents the attachment of micro-organisms to tissue .
If they do attach , macrophages can cause the microorganisms to be encapsulated and destroyed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mucosal immunity ( IgA antibodies , mainly produced by cells in the intestines and lung epithelium ) , cellular immunity ( T-cell activation ) , which can be generated in contact with foreign substances or microorganisms , and humoral immunity ( IgM and IgG antibodies produced by the B cells ) .
Recent research shows that both systems are highly entangled .
It appears that most people already have a congenital or general immunity to e.g .
influenza and other viruses .
This is confirmed by the findings on the cruise ship Diamond @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a few passengers who died of Covid-19 .
Most of the passengers were elderly and were in an ideal situation of transmission on the ship .
However , 75 % did not appear to be infected .
So even in this high-risk group , the majority are resistant to the virus .
A study in the journal Cell shows that most people neutralise the coronavirus by mucosal ( IgA ) and cellular immunity ( T-cells ) , while experiencing few or no symptoms 14 .
Researchers found up to 60 % SARS-Cov-2 reactivity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , suggesting cross-reactivity with other cold ( corona ) viruses.15 Most people therefore already have a congenital or cross-immunity because they were already in contact with variants of the same virus .
The antibody formation ( IgM and IgG ) by B-cells only occupies a relatively small part of our immune system .
This may explain why , with an antibody percentage of 5-10 % , there may be a group immunity anyway .
The efficacy of vaccines is assessed precisely on the basis of whether or not we have these antibodies .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ who test positive ( PCR ) have no complaints .
Their immune system is strong enough .
Strengthening natural immunity is a much more logical approach .
Prevention is an important , insufficiently highlighted pillar : healthy , full-fledged nutrition , exercise in fresh air , without a mask , stress reduction and nourishing emotional and social contacts .
Consequences of social isolation on physical and mental health Social isolation and economic damage led to an increase in depression , anxiety , suicides , intra-family violence and child abuse.16 Studies have shown that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have , the more resistant they are to viruses .
It is much more likely that isolation and quarantine have fatal consequences .
17 The isolation measures have also led to physical inactivity in many older people due to their being forced to stay indoors .
However , sufficient exercise has a positive effect on cognitive functioning , reducing depressive complaints and anxiety and improving physical health , energy levels , well-being and , in general , quality of life.18 Fear , persistent stress and loneliness induced by social distancing have a proven @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
19 A highly contagious virus with millions of deaths without any treatment ?
Mortality turned out to be many times lower than expected and close to that of a normal seasonal flu ( 0.2 % ) .20 The number of registered corona deaths therefore still seems to be overestimated .
There is a difference between death by corona and death with corona .
Humans are often carriers of multiple viruses and potentially pathogenic bacteria at the same time .
Taking into account the fact that most people who developed serious symptoms suffered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ simply conclude that the corona-infection was the cause of death .
This was mostly not taken into account in the statistics .
The most vulnerable groups can be clearly identified .
The vast majority of deceased patients were 80 years of age or older .
The majority ( 70 % ) of the deceased , younger than 70 years , had an underlying disorder , such as cardiovascular suffering , diabetes mellitus , chronic lung disease or obesity .
The vast majority of infected persons ( > 98 % ) did not or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Meanwhile , there is an affordable , safe and efficient therapy available for those who do show severe symptoms of disease in the form of HCQ ( hydroxychloroquine ) , zinc and AZT ( azithromycin ) .
Rapidly applied this therapy leads to recovery and often prevents hospitalisation .
Hardly anyone has to die now .
This effective therapy has been confirmed by the clinical experience of colleagues in the field with impressive results .
This contrasts sharply with the theoretical criticism ( insufficient substantiation by double-blind studies ) which in some countries @ @ @ @ @ @ @ even led to a ban on this therapy .
A meta-analysis in The Lancet , which could not demonstrate an effect of HCQ , was withdrawn .
The primary data sources used proved to be unreliable and 2 out of 3 authors were in conflict of interest .
However , most of the guidelines based on this study remained unchanged … 48 49 We have serious questions about this state of affairs .
In the US , a group of doctors in the field , who see patients on a daily basis , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Doctors ” and gave a press conference which has been watched millions of times.21 51 French Prof Didier Raoult of the Institut d ’ Infectiologie de Marseille ( IHU ) also presented this promising combination therapy as early as April .
Dutch GP Rob Elens , who cured many patients in his practice with HCQ and zinc , called on colleagues in a petition for freedom of therapy.22 The definitive evidence comes from the epidemiological follow-up in Switzerland : mortality rates compared with and without this therapy.23 From the distressing media images of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ where people were suffocating and given artificial respiration in agony , we now know that this was caused by an exaggerated immune response with intravascular coagulation in the pulmonary blood vessels .
The administration of blood thinners and dexamethasone and the avoidance of artificial ventilation , which was found to cause additional damage to lung tissue , means that this dreaded complication , too , is virtually not fatal anymore .
47 It is therefore not a killer virus , but a well-treatable condition .
Spreading occurs by drip infection ( only for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ aerosols in closed , unventilated rooms .
Contamination is therefore not possible in the open air .
Contact tracing and epidemiological studies show that healthy people ( or positively tested asymptomatic carriers ) are virtually unable to transmit the virus .
Healthy people therefore do not put each other at risk .
24 25 Transfer via objects ( e.g .
money , shopping or shopping trolleys ) has not been scientifically proven.26 27 28 All this seriously calls into question the whole policy of social distancing and compulsory mouth masks for healthy people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this .
Oral masks belong in contexts where contacts with proven at-risk groups or people with upper respiratory complaints take place , and in a medical context/hospital-retirement home setting .
They reduce the risk of droplet infection by sneezing or coughing .
Oral masks in healthy individuals are ineffective against the spread of viral infections .
29 30 31 Wearing a mask is not without side effects .
32 33 Oxygen deficiency ( headache , nausea , fatigue , loss of concentration ) occurs fairly quickly , an effect similar to altitude sickness @ @ @ @ @ @ @ complaining of headaches , sinus problems , respiratory problems and hyperventilation due to wearing masks .
In addition , the accumulated CO2 leads to a toxic acidification of the organism which affects our immunity .
Some experts even warn of an increased transmission of the virus in case of inappropriate use of the mask.34 Our Labour Code ( Codex 6 ) refers to a CO2 content ( ventilation in workplaces ) of 900 ppm , maximum 1200 ppm in special circumstances .
After wearing a mask for one minute , this toxic limit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ three to four times higher than these maximum values .
Anyone who wears a mask is therefore in an extreme poorly ventilated room .
35 Inappropriate use of masks without a comprehensive medical cardio-pulmonary test file is therefore not recommended by recognised safety specialists for workers .
Hospitals have a sterile environment in their operating rooms where staff wear masks and there is precise regulation of humidity / temperature with appropriately monitored oxygen flow to compensate for this , thus meeting strict safety standards .
36 A second wave is now being discussed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the measures as a result .
However , closer examination of Sciensano ’ s figures ( latest report of 3 September 2020 ) 37 shows that , although there has been an increase in the number of infections since mid-July , there was no increase in hospital admissions or deaths at that time .
It is therefore not a second wave of corona , but a so-called “ case chemistry ” due to an increased number of tests .
50 The number of hospital admissions or deaths showed a shortlasting minimal increase @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it , we must take into account the recent heatwave .
In addition , the vast majority of the victims are still in the population group > 75 years .
This indicates that the proportion of the measures taken in relation to the working population and young people is disproportionate to the intended objectives .
The vast majority of the positively tested “ infected ” persons are in the age group of the active population , which does not develop any or merely limited symptoms , due to a well-functioning immune system .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ is over .
The corona measures form a striking contrast to the minimal policy pursued by the government until now , when it comes to well-founded measures with proven health benefits such as the sugar tax , the ban on ( e- ) cigarettes and making healthy food , exercise and social support networks financially attractive and widely accessible .
It is a missed opportunity for a better prevention policy that could have brought about a change in mentality in all sections of the population with clear results in terms of public health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the health care budget goes to prevention .
2 As a doctor , we took the Hippocratic Oath : “ I will above all care for my patients , promote their health and alleviate their suffering ” .
“ I will inform my patients correctly.
” “ Even under pressure , I will not use my medical knowledge for practices that are against humanity.
” The current measures force us to act against this oath .
The ‘ primum non nocere ’ , which every doctor and health professional assumes , is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the prospect of the possible introduction of a generalised vaccine , which is not subject to extensive prior testing .
Survey studies on influenza vaccinations show that in 10 years we have only succeeded three times in developing a vaccine with an efficiency rate of more than 50 % .
Vaccinating our elderly appears to be inefficient .
Over 75 years of age , the efficacy is almost non-existent.38 Due to the continuous natural mutation of viruses , as we also see every year in the case of the influenza virus , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ solution , which requires new vaccines each time afterwards .
An untested vaccine , which is implemented by emergency procedure and for which the manufacturers have already obtained legal immunity from possible harm , raises serious questions .
39 40 We do not wish to use our patients as guinea pigs .
On a global scale , 700 000 cases of damage or death are expected as a result of the vaccine.41 If 95 % of people experience Covid-19 virtually symptom-free , the risk of exposure to an untested vaccine is irresponsible .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ official communication plan Over the past few months , newspaper , radio and TV makers seemed to stand almost uncritically behind the panel of experts and the government , there , where it is precisely the press that should be critical and prevent one-sided governmental communication .
This has led to a public communication in our news media , that was more like propaganda than objective reporting .
In our opinion , it is the task of journalism to bring news as objectively and neutrally as possible , aimed at finding the truth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ experts also being given a forum in which to express themselves .
This view is supported by the journalistic codes of ethics.42 The official story that a lockdown was necessary , that this was the only possible solution , and that everyone stood behind this lockdown , made it difficult for people with a different view , as well as experts , to express a different opinion .
Alternative opinions were ignored or ridiculed .
We have not seen open debates in the media , where different views could be expressed .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and articles by many scientific experts and authorities , which were and are still being removed from social media .
We feel that this does not fit in with a free , democratic constitutional state , all the more so as it leads to tunnel vision .
This policy also has a paralysing effect and feeds fear and concern in society .
In this context , we reject the intention of censorship of dissidents in the European Union !
43 The way in which Covid-19 has been portrayed by politicians and the media @ @ @ @ @ @ @ either .
War terms were popular and warlike language was not lacking .
There has often been mention of a ‘ war ’ with an ‘ invisible enemy ’ who has to be ‘ defeated ’ .
The use in the media of phrases such as ‘ care heroes in the front line ’ and ‘ corona victims ’ has further fuelled fear , as has the idea that we are globally dealing with a ‘ killer virus ’ .
The relentless bombardment with figures , that were unleashed on the population day @ @ @ @ @ @ @ without interpreting those figures , without comparing them to flu deaths in other years , without comparing them to deaths from other causes , has induced a real psychosis of fear in the population .
This is not information , this is manipulation .
We deplore the role of the WHO in this , which has called for the infodemic ( i.e .
all divergent opinions from the official discourse , including by experts with different views ) to be silenced by an unprecedented media censorship.43 44 We urgently call on the media @ @ @ @ @ @ @ demand an open debate in which all experts are heard .
The general principle of good governance calls for the proportionality of government decisions to be weighed up in the light of the Higher Legal Standards : any interference by government must comply with the fundamental rights as protected in the European Convention on Human Rights ( ECHR ) .
Interference by public authorities is only permitted in crisis situations .
In other words , discretionary decisions must be proportionate to an absolute necessity .
The measures currently taken concern interference in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the right to respect of private and family life , freedom of thought , conscience and religion , freedom of expression and freedom of assembly and association , the right to education , etc.
, and must therefore comply with fundamental rights as protected by the European Convention on Human Rights ( ECHR ) .
For example , in accordance with Article 8 ( 2 ) of the ECHR , interference with the right to private and family life is permissible only if the measures are necessary in the interests of national security @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the country , the protection of public order and the prevention of criminal offences , the protection of health or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others , the regulatory text on which the interference is based must be sufficiently clear , foreseeable and proportionate to the objectives pursued.45 The predicted pandemic of millions of deaths seemed to respond to these crisis conditions , leading to the establishment of an emergency government .
Now that the objective facts show something completely different , the condition of inability to act otherwise @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there is an emergency ) is no longer in place .
Covid-19 is not a cold virus , but a well treatable condition with a mortality rate comparable to the seasonal flu .
In other words , there is no longer an insurmountable obstacle to public health .
There is no state of emergency .
An open discussion on corona measures means that , in addition to the years of life gained by corona patients , we must also take into account other factors affecting the health of the entire population .
These @ @ @ @ @ @ @ increase in depression , anxiety , suicides , intra-family violence and child abuse ) 16 and economic damage .
If we take this collateral damage into account , the current policy is out of all proportion , the proverbial use of a sledgehammer to crack a nut .
We find it shocking that the government is invoking health as a reason for the emergency law .
As doctors and health professionals , in the face of a virus which , in terms of its harmfulness , mortality and transmissibility , approaches the seasonal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ extremely disproportionate measures .
• We therefore demand an immediate end to all measures .
• We are questioning the legitimacy of the current advisory experts , who meet behind closed doors .
• Following on from ACU 2020 46 https : //acu2020.org/nederlandse-versie/ we call for an in-depth examination of the role of the WHO and the possible influence of conflicts of interest in this organisation .
It was also at the heart of the fight against the “ infodemic ” , i.e .
the systematic censorship of all dissenting opinions in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ democratic state governed by the rule of law.43 • President John Magufuli of Tanzania : “ Even Papaya and Goats are Corona positive ” https : //www.youtube.com/watch ?
v=207HuOxltvI • Open letter by biochemist Drs Mario Ortiz Martinez to the Dutch chamber https : //www.gentechvrij.nl/2020/08/15/foute-interpretatie/ • Lambrecht , B. , Hammad , H. The immunology of the allergy epidemic and the hygiene hypothesis .
Nat Immunol 18 , 1076–1083 ( 2017 ) .
https : //www.nature.com/articles/ni.3829 • Sharvan Sehrawat , Barry T. Rouse , Does the hygiene hypothesis apply to COVID-19 susceptibility ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ISSN 1286-4579 , https : //doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2020.07.002 • Feys , F. , Brokken , S. , & De Peuter , S. ( 2020 , May 22 ) .
Risk-benefit and cost-utility analysis for COVID-19 lockdown in Belgium : the impact on mental health and wellbeing .
https : //psyarxiv.com/xczb3/ • Haralambieva , I.H .
et al.
, 2015 .
The impact of immunosenescence on humoral immune response variation after influenza A/H1N1 vaccination in older subjects .
https : //pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26044074/ • Disinformation related to COVID-19 approaches European Commission EurLex , juni 2020 ( this file @ @ @ @ @ @ @ There is no revival of the pandemic , but a so-called casedemic due to more testing .
https : //www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/crucial-viewing-understanding-covid-19-casedemic1 For latest updates on the outbreak check out our Coronavirus Coverage .
Send in your tips and submissions by filling out this form or write to us directly at the email provided .
Join us on WhatsApp for more intel and updates .
GreatGameIndia is a journal on Geopolitics and International Relations .
Get to know the Geopolitical threats India is facing in our exclusive book India in Cognitive Dissonance .
Past magazine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ section .

Medical Doctors and Health Professionals of Belgium have written an open letter to authorities demanding the investigation of WHO for creating coronavirus infodemic faking the pandemic. The following letter has made an impact on public health authorities not only in Belgium but around the world. The text could pertain to any case in which states locked down their citizens rather than allow people freedom and permit medical professionals to bear the primary job of disease mitigation.
Must Watch: Would you live on 3D Printed Mars for a year for $60,000?
Earlier, it was revealed that a Pornstar and a Sci-Fi Writer influenced WHO policies on Hydroxychloroquine with fake data. An obscure US healthcare analytics company has come under sharp scrutiny for the integrity of its key studies that were published in some of the world’s most prestigious medical journals. World Health Organization and several national governments changed their COVID-19 policies and treatment based on the faulty data provided by the company with a pornstar and a sci-fi writer on their payroll.
An exclusive report by GreatGameIndia revealed how in 2009 WHO prematurely declared ‘swine flu’ a pandemic which resulted in a surge of vaccine orders. The rich and affluent nations were quick to purchase the vaccines for their people. Ironically, most deaths occurred not in Europe but in Africa and Southeast Asia.
In his controversial book renowned author Stuart Blume discloses that many of the most influential advisers, at both World Health Organisation (WHO) and national levels, are paid consultants to the vaccine industry raising a very serious question – that the WHO might be working for the vaccine industry’s interests and not the people – the reason why 10 years ago WHO faked a pandemic.
OPEN LETTER
We, Belgian doctors and health professionals, wish to express our serious concern about the evolution of the situation in the recent months surrounding the outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. We call on politicians to be independently and critically informed in the decision-making process and in the compulsory implementation of corona-measures. We ask for an open debate, where all experts are represented without any form of censorship. After the initial panic surrounding covid-19, the objective facts now show a completely different picture – there is no medical justification for any emergency policy anymore.
Subscribe to GreatGameIndia
The current crisis management has become totally disproportionate and causes more damage than it does any good.
We call for an end to all measures and ask for an immediate restoration of our normal democratic governance and legal structures and of all our civil liberties.
‘A cure must not be worse than the problem’ is a thesis that is more relevant than ever in the current situation. We note, however, that the collateral damage now being caused to the population will have a greater impact in the short and long term on all sections of the population than the number of people now being safeguarded from corona.
In our opinion, the current corona measures and the strict penalties for non-compliance with them are contrary to the values formulated by the Belgian Supreme Health Council, which, until recently, as the health authority, has always ensured quality medicine in our country: “Science – Expertise – Quality – Impartiality – Independence – Transparency”. 1
We believe that the policy has introduced mandatory measures that are not sufficiently scientifically based, unilaterally directed, and that there is not enough space in the media for an open debate in which different views and opinions are heard. In addition, each municipality and province now has the authorisation to add its own measures, whether well-founded or not.
Moreover, the strict repressive policy on corona strongly contrasts with the government’s minimal policy when it comes to disease prevention, strengthening our own immune system through a healthy lifestyle, optimal care with attention for the individual and investment in care personnel.2
The concept of health
In 1948, the WHO defined health as follows: ‘Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or other physical impairment’.3
Health, therefore, is a broad concept that goes beyond the physical and also relates to the emotional and social well-being of the individual. Belgium also has a duty, from the point of view of subscribing to fundamental human rights, to include these human rights in its decision-making when it comes to measures taken in the context of public health. 4
The current global measures taken to combat SARS-CoV-2 violate to a large extent this view of health and human rights. Measures include compulsory wearing of a mask (also in open air and during sporting activities, and in some municipalities even when there are no other people in the vicinity), physical distancing, social isolation, compulsory quarantine for some groups and hygiene measures.
The predicted pandemic with millions of deaths
At the beginning of the pandemic, the measures were understandable and widely supported, even if there were differences in implementation in the countries around us. The WHO originally predicted a pandemic that would claim 3.4% victims, in other words millions of deaths, and a highly contagious virus for which no treatment or vaccine was available. This would put unprecedented pressure on the intensive care units (ICUs) of our hospitals.
This led to a global alarm situation, never seen in the history of mankind: “flatten the curve” was represented by a lockdown that shut down the entire society and economy and quarantined healthy people. Social distancing became the new normal in anticipation of a rescue vaccine.
The facts about covid-19
Gradually, the alarm bell was sounded from many sources: the objective facts showed a completely different reality. 5 6
The course of covid-19 followed the course of a normal wave of infection similar to a flu season. As every year, we see a mix of flu viruses following the curve: first the rhinoviruses, then the influenza A and B viruses, followed by the coronaviruses. There is nothing different from what we normally see.
The use of the non-specific PCR test, which produces many false positives, showed an exponential picture. This test was rushed through with an emergency procedure and was never seriously self-tested. The creator expressly warned that this test was intended for research and not for diagnostics.7
The PCR test works with cycles of amplification of genetic material – a piece of genome is amplified each time. Any contamination (e.g. other viruses, debris from old virus genomes) can possibly result in false positives.8
The test does not measure how many viruses are present in the sample. A real viral infection means a massive presence of viruses, the so-called virus load. If someone tests positive, this does not mean that that person is actually clinically infected, is ill or is going to become ill. Koch’s postulate was not fulfilled (“The pure agent found in a patient with complaints can provoke the same complaints in a healthy person”).
Since a positive PCR test does not automatically indicate active infection or infectivity, this does not justify the social measures taken, which are based solely on these tests. 9 10
Lockdown
If we compare the waves of infection in countries with strict lockdown policies to countries that did not impose lockdowns (Sweden, Iceland …), we see similar curves. So there is no link between the imposed lockdown and the course of the infection. Lockdown has not led to a lower mortality rate.
If we look at the date of application of the imposed lockdowns we see that the lockdowns were set after the peak was already over and the number of cases decreasing. The drop was therefore not the result of the taken measures. 11
As every year, it seems that climatic conditions (weather, temperature and humidity) and growing immunity are more likely to reduce the wave of infection.
Our immune system
For thousands of years, the human body has been exposed daily to moisture and droplets containing infectious microorganisms (viruses, bacteria and fungi).
The penetration of these microorganisms is prevented by an advanced defence mechanism – the immune system. A strong immune system relies on normal daily exposure to these microbial influences. Overly hygienic measures have a detrimental effect on our immunity. 12 13 Only people with a weak or faulty immune system should be protected by extensive hygiene or social distancing.
Influenza will re-emerge in the autumn (in combination with covid-19) and a possible decrease in natural resilience may lead to further casualties.
Our immune system consists of two parts: a congenital, non-specific immune system and an adaptive immune system.
The non-specific immune system forms a first barrier: skin, saliva, gastric juice, intestinal mucus, vibratory hair cells, commensal flora, … and prevents the attachment of micro-organisms to tissue.
If they do attach, macrophages can cause the microorganisms to be encapsulated and destroyed.
The adaptive immune system consists of mucosal immunity (IgA antibodies, mainly produced by cells in the intestines and lung epithelium), cellular immunity (T-cell activation), which can be generated in contact with foreign substances or microorganisms, and humoral immunity (IgM and IgG antibodies produced by the B cells).
Recent research shows that both systems are highly entangled.
It appears that most people already have a congenital or general immunity to e.g. influenza and other viruses. This is confirmed by the findings on the cruise ship Diamond Princess, which was quarantined because of a few passengers who died of Covid-19. Most of the passengers were elderly and were in an ideal situation of transmission on the ship. However, 75% did not appear to be infected. So even in this high-risk group, the majority are resistant to the virus.
A study in the journal Cell shows that most people neutralise the coronavirus by mucosal (IgA) and cellular immunity (T-cells), while experiencing few or no symptoms 14.
Researchers found up to 60% SARS-Cov-2 reactivity with CD4+T cells in a non-infected population, suggesting cross-reactivity with other cold (corona) viruses.15
Most people therefore already have a congenital or cross-immunity because they were already in contact with variants of the same virus.
The antibody formation (IgM and IgG) by B-cells only occupies a relatively small part of our immune system. This may explain why, with an antibody percentage of 5-10%, there may be a group immunity anyway. The efficacy of vaccines is assessed precisely on the basis of whether or not we have these antibodies. This is a misrepresentation.
Most people who test positive (PCR) have no complaints. Their immune system is strong enough. Strengthening natural immunity is a much more logical approach. Prevention is an important, insufficiently highlighted pillar: healthy, full-fledged nutrition, exercise in fresh air, without a mask, stress reduction and nourishing emotional and social contacts.
Consequences of social isolation on physical and mental health
Social isolation and economic damage led to an increase in depression, anxiety, suicides, intra-family violence and child abuse.16
Studies have shown that the more social and emotional commitments people have, the more resistant they are to viruses. It is much more likely that isolation and quarantine have fatal consequences. 17
The isolation measures have also led to physical inactivity in many older people due to their being forced to stay indoors. However, sufficient exercise has a positive effect on cognitive functioning, reducing depressive complaints and anxiety and improving physical health, energy levels, well-being and, in general, quality of life.18
Fear, persistent stress and loneliness induced by social distancing have a proven negative influence on psychological and general health. 19
A highly contagious virus with millions of deaths without any treatment?
Mortality turned out to be many times lower than expected and close to that of a normal seasonal flu (0.2%).20
The number of registered corona deaths therefore still seems to be overestimated.
There is a difference between death by corona and death with corona. Humans are often carriers of multiple viruses and potentially pathogenic bacteria at the same time. Taking into account the fact that most people who developed serious symptoms suffered from additional pathology, one cannot simply conclude that the corona-infection was the cause of death. This was mostly not taken into account in the statistics.
The most vulnerable groups can be clearly identified. The vast majority of deceased patients were 80 years of age or older. The majority (70%) of the deceased, younger than 70 years, had an underlying disorder, such as cardiovascular suffering, diabetes mellitus, chronic lung disease or obesity. The vast majority of infected persons (>98%) did not or hardly became ill or recovered spontaneously.
Meanwhile, there is an affordable, safe and efficient therapy available for those who do show severe symptoms of disease in the form of HCQ (hydroxychloroquine), zinc and AZT (azithromycin). Rapidly applied this therapy leads to recovery and often prevents hospitalisation. Hardly anyone has to die now.
This effective therapy has been confirmed by the clinical experience of colleagues in the field with impressive results. This contrasts sharply with the theoretical criticism (insufficient substantiation by double-blind studies) which in some countries (e.g. the Netherlands) has even led to a ban on this therapy. A meta-analysis in The Lancet, which could not demonstrate an effect of HCQ, was withdrawn. The primary data sources used proved to be unreliable and 2 out of 3 authors were in conflict of interest. However, most of the guidelines based on this study remained unchanged … 48 49
We have serious questions about this state of affairs.
In the US, a group of doctors in the field, who see patients on a daily basis, united in “America’s Frontline Doctors” and gave a press conference which has been watched millions of times.21 51
French Prof Didier Raoult of the Institut d’Infectiologie de Marseille (IHU) also presented this promising combination therapy as early as April. Dutch GP Rob Elens, who cured many patients in his practice with HCQ and zinc, called on colleagues in a petition for freedom of therapy.22
The definitive evidence comes from the epidemiological follow-up in Switzerland: mortality rates compared with and without this therapy.23
From the distressing media images of ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome) where people were suffocating and given artificial respiration in agony, we now know that this was caused by an exaggerated immune response with intravascular coagulation in the pulmonary blood vessels. The administration of blood thinners and dexamethasone and the avoidance of artificial ventilation, which was found to cause additional damage to lung tissue, means that this dreaded complication, too, is virtually not fatal anymore. 47
It is therefore not a killer virus, but a well-treatable condition.
Propagation
Spreading occurs by drip infection (only for patients who cough or sneeze) and aerosols in closed, unventilated rooms. Contamination is therefore not possible in the open air. Contact tracing and epidemiological studies show that healthy people (or positively tested asymptomatic carriers) are virtually unable to transmit the virus. Healthy people therefore do not put each other at risk. 24 25
Transfer via objects (e.g. money, shopping or shopping trolleys) has not been scientifically proven.26 27 28
All this seriously calls into question the whole policy of social distancing and compulsory mouth masks for healthy people – there is no scientific basis for this.
Masks
Oral masks belong in contexts where contacts with proven at-risk groups or people with upper respiratory complaints take place, and in a medical context/hospital-retirement home setting. They reduce the risk of droplet infection by sneezing or coughing. Oral masks in healthy individuals are ineffective against the spread of viral infections. 29 30 31
Wearing a mask is not without side effects. 32 33 Oxygen deficiency (headache, nausea, fatigue, loss of concentration) occurs fairly quickly, an effect similar to altitude sickness. Every day we now see patients complaining of headaches, sinus problems, respiratory problems and hyperventilation due to wearing masks. In addition, the accumulated CO2 leads to a toxic acidification of the organism which affects our immunity. Some experts even warn of an increased transmission of the virus in case of inappropriate use of the mask.34
Our Labour Code (Codex 6) refers to a CO2 content (ventilation in workplaces) of 900 ppm, maximum 1200 ppm in special circumstances. After wearing a mask for one minute, this toxic limit is considerably exceeded to values that are three to four times higher than these maximum values. Anyone who wears a mask is therefore in an extreme poorly ventilated room. 35
Inappropriate use of masks without a comprehensive medical cardio-pulmonary test file is therefore not recommended by recognised safety specialists for workers.
Hospitals have a sterile environment in their operating rooms where staff wear masks and there is precise regulation of humidity / temperature with appropriately monitored oxygen flow to compensate for this, thus meeting strict safety standards. 36
A second corona wave?
A second wave is now being discussed in Belgium, with a further tightening of the measures as a result. However, closer examination of Sciensano’s figures (latest report of 3 September 2020)37 shows that, although there has been an increase in the number of infections since mid-July, there was no increase in hospital admissions or deaths at that time. It is therefore not a second wave of corona, but a so-called “case chemistry” due to an increased number of tests. 50
The number of hospital admissions or deaths showed a shortlasting minimal increase in recent weeks, but in interpreting it, we must take into account the recent heatwave. In addition, the vast majority of the victims are still in the population group >75 years.
This indicates that the proportion of the measures taken in relation to the working population and young people is disproportionate to the intended objectives.
The vast majority of the positively tested “infected” persons are in the age group of the active population, which does not develop any or merely limited symptoms, due to a well-functioning immune system.
So nothing has changed – the peak is over.
Strengthening a prevention policy
The corona measures form a striking contrast to the minimal policy pursued by the government until now, when it comes to well-founded measures with proven health benefits such as the sugar tax, the ban on (e-)cigarettes and making healthy food, exercise and social support networks financially attractive and widely accessible. It is a missed opportunity for a better prevention policy that could have brought about a change in mentality in all sections of the population with clear results in terms of public health. At present, only 3% of the health care budget goes to prevention. 2
The Hippocratic Oath
As a doctor, we took the Hippocratic Oath:
“I will above all care for my patients, promote their health and alleviate their suffering”.
“I will inform my patients correctly.”
“Even under pressure, I will not use my medical knowledge for practices that are against humanity.”
The current measures force us to act against this oath.
Other health professionals have a similar code.
The ‘primum non nocere’, which every doctor and health professional assumes, is also undermined by the current measures and by the prospect of the possible introduction of a generalised vaccine, which is not subject to extensive prior testing.
Vaccine
Survey studies on influenza vaccinations show that in 10 years we have only succeeded three times in developing a vaccine with an efficiency rate of more than 50%. Vaccinating our elderly appears to be inefficient. Over 75 years of age, the efficacy is almost non-existent.38
Due to the continuous natural mutation of viruses, as we also see every year in the case of the influenza virus, a vaccine is at most a temporary solution, which requires new vaccines each time afterwards. An untested vaccine, which is implemented by emergency procedure and for which the manufacturers have already obtained legal immunity from possible harm, raises serious questions. 39 40 We do not wish to use our patients as guinea pigs.
On a global scale, 700 000 cases of damage or death are expected as a result of the vaccine.41
If 95% of people experience Covid-19 virtually symptom-free, the risk of exposure to an untested vaccine is irresponsible.
The role of the media and the official communication plan
Over the past few months, newspaper, radio and TV makers seemed to stand almost uncritically behind the panel of experts and the government, there, where it is precisely the press that should be critical and prevent one-sided governmental communication. This has led to a public communication in our news media, that was more like propaganda than objective reporting.
In our opinion, it is the task of journalism to bring news as objectively and neutrally as possible, aimed at finding the truth and critically controlling power, with dissenting experts also being given a forum in which to express themselves.
This view is supported by the journalistic codes of ethics.42
The official story that a lockdown was necessary, that this was the only possible solution, and that everyone stood behind this lockdown, made it difficult for people with a different view, as well as experts, to express a different opinion.
Alternative opinions were ignored or ridiculed. We have not seen open debates in the media, where different views could be expressed.
We were also surprised by the many videos and articles by many scientific experts and authorities, which were and are still being removed from social media. We feel that this does not fit in with a free, democratic constitutional state, all the more so as it leads to tunnel vision. This policy also has a paralysing effect and feeds fear and concern in society. In this context, we reject the intention of censorship of dissidents in the European Union! 43
The way in which Covid-19 has been portrayed by politicians and the media has not done the situation any good either. War terms were popular and warlike language was not lacking. There has often been mention of a ‘war’ with an ‘invisible enemy’ who has to be ‘defeated’. The use in the media of phrases such as ‘care heroes in the front line’ and ‘corona victims’ has further fuelled fear, as has the idea that we are globally dealing with a ‘killer virus’.
The relentless bombardment with figures, that were unleashed on the population day after day, hour after hour, without interpreting those figures, without comparing them to flu deaths in other years, without comparing them to deaths from other causes, has induced a real psychosis of fear in the population. This is not information, this is manipulation.
We deplore the role of the WHO in this, which has called for the infodemic (i.e. all divergent opinions from the official discourse, including by experts with different views) to be silenced by an unprecedented media censorship.43 44
We urgently call on the media to take their responsibilities here!
We demand an open debate in which all experts are heard.
Emergency law versus Human Rights
The general principle of good governance calls for the proportionality of government decisions to be weighed up in the light of the Higher Legal Standards: any interference by government must comply with the fundamental rights as protected in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Interference by public authorities is only permitted in crisis situations. In other words, discretionary decisions must be proportionate to an absolute necessity.
The measures currently taken concern interference in the exercise of, among other things, the right to respect of private and family life, freedom of thought, conscience and religion, freedom of expression and freedom of assembly and association, the right to education, etc., and must therefore comply with fundamental rights as protected by the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
For example, in accordance with Article 8(2) of the ECHR, interference with the right to private and family life is permissible only if the measures are necessary in the interests of national security, public safety, the economic well-being of the country, the protection of public order and the prevention of criminal offences, the protection of health or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others, the regulatory text on which the interference is based must be sufficiently clear, foreseeable and proportionate to the objectives pursued.45
The predicted pandemic of millions of deaths seemed to respond to these crisis conditions, leading to the establishment of an emergency government. Now that the objective facts show something completely different, the condition of inability to act otherwise (no time to evaluate thoroughly if there is an emergency) is no longer in place. Covid-19 is not a cold virus, but a well treatable condition with a mortality rate comparable to the seasonal flu. In other words, there is no longer an insurmountable obstacle to public health.
There is no state of emergency.
Immense damage caused by the current policies
An open discussion on corona measures means that, in addition to the years of life gained by corona patients, we must also take into account other factors affecting the health of the entire population. These include damage in the psychosocial domain (increase in depression, anxiety, suicides, intra-family violence and child abuse)16 and economic damage.
If we take this collateral damage into account, the current policy is out of all proportion, the proverbial use of a sledgehammer to crack a nut.
We find it shocking that the government is invoking health as a reason for the emergency law.
As doctors and health professionals, in the face of a virus which, in terms of its harmfulness, mortality and transmissibility, approaches the seasonal influenza, we can only reject these extremely disproportionate measures.
We therefore demand an immediate end to all measures.
We are questioning the legitimacy of the current advisory experts, who meet behind closed doors.
Following on from ACU 2020 46 https://acu2020.org/nederlandse-versie/ we call for an in-depth examination of the role of the WHO and the possible influence of conflicts of interest in this organisation. It was also at the heart of the fight against the “infodemic”, i.e. the systematic censorship of all dissenting opinions in the media. This is unacceptable for a democratic state governed by the rule of law.43
Courtesy of Docs tor Open Debate
References
For latest updates on the outbreak check out our Coronavirus Coverage.
Send in your tips and submissions by filling out this form or write to us directly at the email provided. Join us on WhatsApp for more intel and updates.
GreatGameIndia is a journal on Geopolitics and International Relations. Get to know the Geopolitical threats India is facing in our exclusive book India in Cognitive Dissonance. Past magazine issues can be accessed from the Archives section.


greatgameindia--2020-09-28--500,000 Sharks Will Be Killed To Make Coronavirus Vaccine From Natural Oil Made In Its Liver

Around 500,000 sharks will be killed to make Coronavirus vaccine , wildlife experts have claimed .
Sharks are harvested for squalene – a natural oil made in the liver of sharks which is used as an adjuvant to increase the effectiveness of a vaccine .
It is listed as an ingredient on a number of candidates for the Covid-19 vaccine , including in current flu jabs .
Stefanie Brendl , the founder and executive director of Shark Allies has launched a petition against the use of squalene from sharks for making coronavirus vaccine .
The Pharma Cartel is planning to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and rake in profits of a 100 years .
If one of those vaccines is used world-wide , conservationist group Shark Allies believe around 250,000 sharks will need to be slaughtered to provide one dose for each person .
However now they have started advocating that two doses may be needed to immunise the population , meaning around 500,000 sharks would need to be slaughtered , according to the California-based group ’ s calculations .
Stefanie Brendl , founder and executive director of Shark Allies , said : “ Harvesting something from a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sustainable , especially if it ’ s a top predator that doesn ’ t reproduce in huge numbers .
There ’ s so many unknowns of how big and how long this pandemic might go on , and then how many versions of it we have to go through , that if we continue using sharks , the numbers of sharks taken for this product could be really high , year after year after year.
” This could spell potential disaster for sharks and humans since this resource is neither sustainable nor reliable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine .
Shark squalene production requires relying on a finite , wild animal population .
Most shark species are already at critical levels and will not withstand an increase in demand for a global vaccine .
Countries producing shark squalene may soon need the oil for their own vaccine .
The supply chain has never been tested at the scale that a coronavirus vaccine would demand .
There is also very little quality control and transparency in the shark squalene industry .
In a nutshell , exploiting sharks for a key vaccine ingredient @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and reliable non-animal alternatives is a detrimental and destructive approach .
The majority of cheap shark squalene comes from countries that are poorly regulated in terms of fisheries and fish oil production .
This creates several problems : • There is very little transparency of what animals end up in squalene production .
Reports have uncovered that protected and endangered shark species end up in the shark oil trade , which is the basis for squalene and supplement production .
There is no possible way to ensure that any squalene comes purely from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ very little quality control .
• There is a dependency on supply from countries that may soon need the oil for their own vaccine and could potentially corner the market .
• If all squalene production would suddenly shift to domestic sources , it would only magnify the problem for sharks in US or EU waters .
According to the World Health Organisation ( WHO ) there are 40 candidate vaccines for Covid-19 in clinical evaluation and 142 vaccines in preclinical evaluation .
Shark Allies say that , of these vaccines , 17 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ adjuvants are shark-squalene based .
Around 3,000 sharks are needed to extract one tonne of squalene .
The group has set up an online petition named ‘ Stop Using Sharks in COVID-19 Vaccine – Use EXISTING Sustainable Options ’ .
For latest updates on the outbreak check out our Coronavirus Coverage .
Send in your tips and submissions by filling out this form or write to us directly at the email provided .
Join us on WhatsApp for more intel and updates .
GreatGameIndia is a journal on Geopolitics and International Relations .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ is facing in our exclusive book India in Cognitive Dissonance .
Past magazine issues can be accessed from the Archives section .

Around 500,000 sharks will be killed to make Coronavirus vaccine, wildlife experts have claimed. Sharks are harvested for squalene – a natural oil made in the liver of sharks which is used as an adjuvant to increase the effectiveness of a vaccine. It is listed as an ingredient on a number of candidates for the Covid-19 vaccine, including in current flu jabs. Stefanie Brendl, the founder and executive director of Shark Allies has launched a petition against the use of squalene from sharks for making coronavirus vaccine.
Must Watch: Would you live on 3D Printed Mars for a year for $60,000?
The Pharma Cartel is planning to vaccinate the entire population of the planet and rake in profits of a 100 years. If one of those vaccines is used world-wide, conservationist group Shark Allies believe around 250,000 sharks will need to be slaughtered to provide one dose for each person.
However now they have started advocating that two doses may be needed to immunise the population, meaning around 500,000 sharks would need to be slaughtered, according to the California-based group’s calculations.
Stefanie Brendl, founder and executive director of Shark Allies, said:
“Harvesting something from a wild animal is never going to be sustainable, especially if it’s a top predator that doesn’t reproduce in huge numbers. There’s so many unknowns of how big and how long this pandemic might go on, and then how many versions of it we have to go through, that if we continue using sharks, the numbers of sharks taken for this product could be really high, year after year after year.”
This could spell potential disaster for sharks and humans since this resource is neither sustainable nor reliable for the mass production of a COVID-19 vaccine. Shark squalene production requires relying on a finite, wild animal population. Most shark species are already at critical levels and will not withstand an increase in demand for a global vaccine.
Subscribe to GreatGameIndia
Countries producing shark squalene may soon need the oil for their own vaccine. The supply chain has never been tested at the scale that a coronavirus vaccine would demand. There is also very little quality control and transparency in the shark squalene industry. In a nutshell, exploiting sharks for a key vaccine ingredient that can be derived from more sustainable and reliable non-animal alternatives is a detrimental and destructive approach.
The majority of cheap shark squalene comes from countries that are poorly regulated in terms of fisheries and fish oil production. This creates several problems:
There is very little transparency of what animals end up in squalene production. Reports have uncovered that protected and endangered shark species end up in the shark oil trade, which is the basis for squalene and supplement production. There is no possible way to ensure that any squalene comes purely from legally harvested species.
There is very little quality control.
There is a dependency on supply from countries that may soon need the oil for their own vaccine and could potentially corner the market.
If all squalene production would suddenly shift to domestic sources, it would only magnify the problem for sharks in US or EU waters.
According to the World Health Organisation (WHO) there are 40 candidate vaccines for Covid-19 in clinical evaluation and 142 vaccines in preclinical evaluation.
Shark Allies say that, of these vaccines, 17 use adjuvants, and five of those adjuvants are shark-squalene based.
Support GreatGameIndia GreatGameIndia is being actively targeted by powerful forces who do not wish us to survive. Your contribution, however small help us keep afloat. We accept voluntary payment for the content available for free on this website via UPI, PayPal and Bitcoin.


greatgameindia--2020-09-29--The Secret History Of How British Intelligence Created Amnesty International

Amnesty International projects itself as the watchdog on human rights worldwide with the stated mission to campaign for “ a world in which every person enjoys all of the human rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights instruments.
” However , lesser known is the fact that Amnesty International was created by British Intelligence for intelligence gathering to carry out social engineering of targeted nations critical of the British Empire .
Amnesty International was involved in not only the cover-up of torture and regime change by British agents but also in sparking a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as a global defender of human rights runs counter to its early days when the British Foreign Office was censoring reports critical of the British Empire .
During the 1960s the U.K. was withdrawing from its colonies and the Foreign Office and Colonial Office were hungry for information from human-rights activists about the situations on the ground .
In 1963 , the Foreign Office instructed its operatives abroad to provide “ discreet support ” for Amnesty ’ s campaigns .
The Deep State Anglo American lobby has since been working to re-create the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ native politicians and businessmen for gathering intelligence and cracking business deals .
One of its outfits , CTD Advisors operated by the son of a Pakistani British spy and heavily infested with former British intelligence chiefs advocating foreign intervention in Kashmir was recently exposed by GreatGameIndia .
Due to its meddling in Kashmir , former Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi in 1990 ( that time Leader of Opposition ) demanded ban of entry of Amnesty International in Kashmir accusing Amnesty as a dubious organisation .
Dr Kirsten Sellars the Visiting Fellow at the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Australian National University writes : Peter Benenson , the co-founder of Amnesty International , had deep ties to the British Foreign Office and Colonial Office .
During the war , he worked in military intelligence at the Bletchley Park code-breaking center .
Benenson worked as an undercover spy gathering intelligence under the cover of Amnesty International , directly sponsored by The Crown .
In 1964 , Benenson enlisted the Foreign Office ’ s assistance in obtaining a visa to Haiti .
The Foreign Office secured the visa and wrote to its Haiti @ @ @ @ @ @ @ [ ed ] the aims of Amnesty International.
” There , Benenson went undercover as a painter , as Minister of State Walter Padley told him prior to his departure that “ We shall have to be a little careful not to give the Haitians the impression that your visit is actually sponsored by Her Majesty ’ s Government.
” In 1966 , Amnesty International was rocked by a major scandal when its founder Peter Benenson claimed that the organisation was infiltrated by British intelligence agents and called for its headquarters to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ followed by claims from the US that the Central Intelligence Agency ( CIA ) was also involved in Amnesty .
Benenson himself was then exposed for accepting funds from the British Government .
Unclassified documents also reveal how Israeli intelligence operated the local branch of Amnesty International .
The Israeli government funded the establishment and activity of the Amnesty International branch in Israel in the 1960s and 70s .
Official documents reveal that the chairman of the organization was in constant contact with the Foreign Ministry and received instructions from it .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Daily , a daily newspaper in Sudan , compared Amnesty to the US National Endowment for Democracy , during its regime change campaign in Sudan .
The newspaper claimed “ Amnesty International is , in essence , a British intelligence organization which is a part of the Government decision making system.
” In a September 2016 report , Amnesty International claimed that the Sudanese government was waging chemical warfare against its own people .
Western media ran with it as fact , but African media found it to be highly dubious and based @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( republished in full by Modern Ghana ) reflects on Amnesty International ’ s history as a propaganda arm of the British government .
Amnesty international has frequently used the service to diffuse political propaganda and deliver its messages against political opponents all over the world using both radio and TV..
It may not be a surprise to many that the list of the British Government opponents is the same list as Amnesty opponents .
The recent report of Amnesty on Darfur is just part of the British negative role against Sudan .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Amnesty and the British Government reveals that the former was originally a clandestine intelligence organ affiliated to the latter .
Amnesty is a British clone of the American National Endowment for Democracy which preceded Amnesty in working under the umbrella of the State Department .
Therefore , Amnesty is not just a pressure group ; it is , in essence a British Intelligence organization which is a part of the Government decision making system .
In 1966 , an Amnesty report on the British colony of Aden , a port city in present-day @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s torture of detainees at the Ras Morbut interrogation center .
Prisoners there were stripped naked during interrogations , were forced to sit on poles that entered their anus , had their genitals twisted , cigarettes burned on their face , and were kept in cells where feces and urine covered the floor .
The report was never released , however .
Benenson said that Amnesty general secretary Robert Swann had censored it to please the Foreign Office , but Amnesty co-founder Eric Baker said Benenson and Swann had met with the Foreign @ @ @ @ @ @ @ under wraps in exchange for reforms .
Francis Boyle is a professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law .
He drafted the U.S. domestic implementing legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention , known as the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 , that was approved unanimously by both Houses of the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President George H.W .
Bush .
In an exclusive interview given to Geopolitics and Empire , Dr. Boyle confirmed GreatGameIndia ‘ s exclusive report Coronavirus Bioweapon – where we reported @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at the Canadian lab in Winnipeg were involved in the smuggling of Coronavirus to Wuhan ’ s lab from where it is believed to have been leaked .
In the explosive interview Dr. Francis Boyle , gave a detailed statement admitting that the 2019 Wuhan Coronavirus is an offensive Biological Warfare Weapon and that the World Health Organization ( WHO ) already knows about it .
As member of the board of Amnesty International USA at the end of the 1980s and early 1990s , he claimed that Amnesty International USA acted in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ policy interests .
He attributes links between Amnesty International and US/UK foreign policy interests to the relatively large financial contribution of Amnesty International USA to AI ’ s international budget , which he estimated at 20 % .
Boyle added that Amnesty International was instrumental in publicizing the “ Iraqi soldiers dumping children from incubators in Kuwait ” hoax .
In an exclusive interview with Covert Action Quarterly , Dr Francis Boyle explained how covert agents at Amnesty International sparked a war : Of the six votes in the United States Senate that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , several of those senators said that they were influenced by the Amnesty report .
Now I want to make it clear this was not a job by Amnesty International but by London , and what happened then , when the war started , at the next AI USA board meeting , I demanded an investigation .
By then it had come out that this was Kuwaiti propaganda put together by the PR firm , Hill & Knowlton , and I demanded an investigation .
Absolutely nothing happened .
There was never an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out of London .
They refused ever to admit that they did anything wrong .
There has never been an explanation , there has never been an apology .
It ’ s down the ‘ memory hole ’ like 1984 and Orwell .
My conclusion was that a high-level official of Amnesty International at that time , whom I will not name , was a British intelligence agent .
Moreover , my fellow board member , who also investigated this independently of me , reached the exact same conclusion .
So certainly when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to work with Amnesty in London , I just tell them , “ Look , just understand , they ’ re penetrated by intelligence agents , U.K. , maybe U.S. , I don ’ t know , but you certainly can ’ t trust them.
” Send in your tips and submissions by filling out this form or write to us directly at the email provided .
Join us on WhatsApp for more intel and updates .
GreatGameIndia is a journal on Geopolitics and International Relations .
Get to know the Geopolitical threats @ @ @ @ @ @ @ India in Cognitive Dissonance .
Past magazine issues can be accessed from the Archives section .

Amnesty International projects itself as the watchdog on human rights worldwide with the stated mission to campaign for “a world in which every person enjoys all of the human rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights instruments.” However, lesser known is the fact that Amnesty International was created by British Intelligence for intelligence gathering to carry out social engineering of targeted nations critical of the British Empire. Amnesty International was involved in not only the cover-up of torture and regime change by British agents but also in sparking a war.
Must Watch: Would you live on 3D Printed Mars for a year for $60,000?
Amnesty International – Intelligence gathering arm of British Empire
Amnesty’s stellar image as a global defender of human rights runs counter to its early days when the British Foreign Office was censoring reports critical of the British Empire. During the 1960s the U.K. was withdrawing from its colonies and the Foreign Office and Colonial Office were hungry for information from human-rights activists about the situations on the ground. In 1963, the Foreign Office instructed its operatives abroad to provide “discreet support” for Amnesty’s campaigns.
The Deep State Anglo American lobby has since been working to re-create the British Empire of Modern Times, recruiting native politicians and businessmen for gathering intelligence and cracking business deals. One of its outfits, CTD Advisors operated by the son of a Pakistani British spy and heavily infested with former British intelligence chiefs advocating foreign intervention in Kashmir was recently exposed by GreatGameIndia.
Isn’t providing “insider knowledge” for cracking business deals to former intelligence chiefs of a foreign country by serving member of Indian Parliament a conflict of interest, if not an economic offense and an act of #espionage? Our exclusive report 》 https://t.co/7B6EhWZXiK pic.twitter.com/h84eIO7JJM — GreatGameIndia (@GreatGameIndia) November 22, 2019
Due to its meddling in Kashmir, former Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi in 1990 (that time Leader of Opposition) demanded ban of entry of Amnesty International in Kashmir accusing Amnesty as a dubious organisation.
Rajiv Gandhi in 1990 (that time Leader of Opposition) demanded ban of entry of Amnesty International in Kashmir accusing Amnesty as a dubious organisation https://t.co/oJLLOAzOu4 — J Gopikrishnan (@jgopikrishnan70) September 29, 2020
Dr Kirsten Sellars the Visiting Fellow at the Coral Bell School of Asia Pacific Affairs, Australian National University writes:
Subscribe to GreatGameIndia
During the 1960s the United Kingdom was still in the process of withdrawing from its colonies, and civil service departments such as the Colonial Office and the Foreign Office welcomed information from those familiar with human rights issues. The relationship between Amnesty and Whitehall was placed on a more solid footing in 1963, when the Foreign Office wrote to overseas missions urging “discreet support” for Amnesty: discreet, because its public endorsement would have seriously undermined the campaign’s credibility.
Peter Benenson – the Undercover Spy
Peter Benenson, the co-founder of Amnesty International, had deep ties to the British Foreign Office and Colonial Office. During the war, he worked in military intelligence at the Bletchley Park code-breaking center. Benenson worked as an undercover spy gathering intelligence under the cover of Amnesty International, directly sponsored by The Crown.
In 1964, Benenson enlisted the Foreign Office’s assistance in obtaining a visa to Haiti. The Foreign Office secured the visa and wrote to its Haiti representative Alan Elgar saying it “support[ed] the aims of Amnesty International.” There, Benenson went undercover as a painter, as Minister of State Walter Padley told him prior to his departure that “We shall have to be a little careful not to give the Haitians the impression that your visit is actually sponsored by Her Majesty’s Government.”
Amnesty International infiltrated by Spies
In 1966, Amnesty International was rocked by a major scandal when its founder Peter Benenson claimed that the organisation was infiltrated by British intelligence agents and called for its headquarters to be moved to another country. This is followed by claims from the US that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) was also involved in Amnesty. Benenson himself was then exposed for accepting funds from the British Government.
One thing that Amnesty International and the White Helmets have in common is that they were both founded by former British military intelligence officers https://t.co/M6uXNi7jx5 — Alex Rubinstein (@RealAlexRubi) February 3, 2020
Unclassified documents also reveal how Israeli intelligence operated the local branch of Amnesty International. The Israeli government funded the establishment and activity of the Amnesty International branch in Israel in the 1960s and 70s. Official documents reveal that the chairman of the organization was in constant contact with the Foreign Ministry and received instructions from it.
Regime Change in Sudan
In the mid 1990s, the Sudan Vision Daily, a daily newspaper in Sudan, compared Amnesty to the US National Endowment for Democracy, during its regime change campaign in Sudan. The newspaper claimed “Amnesty International is, in essence, a British intelligence organization which is a part of the Government decision making system.”
Amnesty International’s new ‘[Regime] Change is Possible’ video calls for solidarity with right-wing insurrection in Venezuela https://t.co/Co6OVL7xRV pic.twitter.com/MJtG7wyevz — Dan Cohen (@dancohen3000) October 6, 2018
In a September 2016 report, Amnesty International claimed that the Sudanese government was waging chemical warfare against its own people. Western media ran with it as fact, but African media found it to be highly dubious and based on hearsay. The following Sudanese report (republished in full by Modern Ghana) reflects on Amnesty International’s history as a propaganda arm of the British government.
Amnesty international has frequently used the service to diffuse political propaganda and deliver its messages against political opponents all over the world using both radio and TV.. It may not be a surprise to many that the list of the British Government opponents is the same list as Amnesty opponents. The recent report of Amnesty on Darfur is just part of the British negative role against Sudan. The recently disclosed type of nexus between Amnesty and the British Government reveals that the former was originally a clandestine intelligence organ affiliated to the latter. Amnesty is a British clone of the American National Endowment for Democracy which preceded Amnesty in working under the umbrella of the State Department. Therefore, Amnesty is not just a pressure group; it is, in essence a British Intelligence organization which is a part of the Government decision making system.
Amnesty International coverup torture by British agents in Yemen
In 1966, an Amnesty report on the British colony of Aden, a port city in present-day Yemen, detailed the British government’s torture of detainees at the Ras Morbut interrogation center. Prisoners there were stripped naked during interrogations, were forced to sit on poles that entered their anus, had their genitals twisted, cigarettes burned on their face, and were kept in cells where feces and urine covered the floor.
The report was never released, however. Benenson said that Amnesty general secretary Robert Swann had censored it to please the Foreign Office, but Amnesty co-founder Eric Baker said Benenson and Swann had met with the Foreign Office and agreed to keep the report under wraps in exchange for reforms.
Amnesty International exposed by Dr Francis Boyle
Francis Boyle is a professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law. He drafted the U.S. domestic implementing legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention, known as the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, that was approved unanimously by both Houses of the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President George H.W. Bush.
In an explosive interview Dr. Francis Boyle, who drafted the Biological Weapons Act has given a detailed statement admitting that the 2019 Wuhan #Coronavirus is an offensive Biological Warfare Weapon and that the WHO already knows about it.https://t.co/MbItPq8OTz — GreatGameIndia (@GreatGameIndia) February 3, 2020
In an exclusive interview given to Geopolitics and Empire, Dr. Boyle confirmed GreatGameIndia‘s exclusive report Coronavirus Bioweapon – where we reported in detail how Chinese Biowarfare agents working at the Canadian lab in Winnipeg were involved in the smuggling of Coronavirus to Wuhan’s lab from where it is believed to have been leaked.
In the explosive interview Dr. Francis Boyle, gave a detailed statement admitting that the 2019 Wuhan Coronavirus is an offensive Biological Warfare Weapon and that the World Health Organization (WHO) already knows about it.
As member of the board of Amnesty International USA at the end of the 1980s and early 1990s, he claimed that Amnesty International USA acted in ways closely related to United States foreign policy interests. He attributes links between Amnesty International and US/UK foreign policy interests to the relatively large financial contribution of Amnesty International USA to AI’s international budget, which he estimated at 20%. Boyle added that Amnesty International was instrumental in publicizing the “Iraqi soldiers dumping children from incubators in Kuwait” hoax.
How Amnesty International sparked a War
In an exclusive interview with Covert Action Quarterly, Dr Francis Boyle explained how covert agents at Amnesty International sparked a war:
Of the six votes in the United States Senate that passed the resolution to go to war, several of those senators said that they were influenced by the Amnesty report. Now I want to make it clear this was not a job by Amnesty International but by London, and what happened then, when the war started, at the next AI USA board meeting, I demanded an investigation. By then it had come out that this was Kuwaiti propaganda put together by the PR firm, Hill & Knowlton, and I demanded an investigation. Absolutely nothing happened. There was never an investigation, there was total stonewalling coming out of London. They refused ever to admit that they did anything wrong. There has never been an explanation, there has never been an apology. It’s down the ‘memory hole’ like 1984 and Orwell. My conclusion was that a high-level official of Amnesty International at that time, whom I will not name, was a British intelligence agent. Moreover, my fellow board member, who also investigated this independently of me, reached the exact same conclusion. So certainly when I am dealing with people who want to work with Amnesty in London, I just tell them, “Look, just understand, they’re penetrated by intelligence agents, U.K., maybe U.S., I don’t know, but you certainly can’t trust them.”
Send in your tips and submissions by filling out this form or write to us directly at the email provided. Join us on WhatsApp for more intel and updates.
GreatGameIndia is a journal on Geopolitics and International Relations. Get to know the Geopolitical threats India is facing in our exclusive book India in Cognitive Dissonance. Past magazine issues can be accessed from the Archives section.