lifesitenews--2020-12-04--Health departments across the US admit that they ignore key COVID-19 test data

December 4 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) – An investigation by Just the News revealed that health departments in several states do not track key data used to determine the infectiousness of people who test positive for COVID-19 with PCR tests .
Current testing protocol may mean that “ many of the ‘ positive ’ test results recorded throughout the country… denote nothing more than fragments of dead COVID virus , ” Just the News reported .
PCR , or polymerase chain reaction , is one of the most common COVID-19 testing methods and has been called the “ gold @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reliability has come under fire repeatedly in recent weeks , including by the Centers for Disease Control ( CDC ) .
The PCR approach amplifies viral genetic material in order to detect whether or not patient samples contain COVID-19 .
The number of amplifications that a PCR test must create before it identifies an infection is called “ cycle threshold ” or Ct. “ There is a correlation between the Ct value and the amount of viral genetic material that was present in the specimen , ” the CDC says .
A high-cycle @ @ @ @ @ @ @ may be derived from a non-infectious person who doesn ’ t need to isolate .
In an interview over the summer , Dr. Anthony Fauci , head of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases , said , for a sample with “ a cycle threshold of 35 or more , ” “ the chances of it being replication-confident are minuscule.
” If the sample has more than a threshold of “ 37 , 38 , even 36 , ” “ it 's just dead nucleotides , period , ” he told @ @ @ @ @ @ @ York Times published in August noted that “ [ m ] ost tests set the limit at 40 , a few at 37 .
This means that you are positive for the coronavirus if the test process required up to 40 cycles , or 37 , to detect the virus.
” Researchers quoted in the article advised that “ [ a ] more reasonable cutoff would be 30 to 35 ” “ or even less , ” the newspaper said .
“ Those changes would mean the amount of genetic material in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be 100-fold to 1,000-fold that of the current standard for the test to return a positive result… worth acting on , ” they stated .
Three sets of testing data processed by officials in New York , Massachusetts , and Nevada showed that “ 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus , ” according to the report .
Just the News contacted health departments in every state about cycle threshold data , finding that many simply don ’ t monitor it .
“ Overwhelmingly , health officials responded that they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cycle thresholds from the vast majority of tests occurring in their states , ” Just the News reported .
An official from the Pennsylvania Department of Health told Just the News , “ We do not get any cycle thresholds from any laboratories.
” A representative of California ’ s health department similarly related , “ The state does not maintain these values because it does not receive these from reporting labs.
” The director of the Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services admitted , “ This information is not tracked by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Officials from at least eight other states provided Just the News with statements denying that they keep track of the cycle threshold information from PCR tests .
“ Many of the health officials qualified their responses with caveats about PCR tests and threshold data , ” Just the News reported .
For example , the administrator of Hawaii ’ s state laboratory said , “ CT values depend on the chemistry used , the instrument used , and the nucleic acid extraction method used.
” He added , “ there are many sources @ @ @ @ @ @ @ besides Fauci have extolled the importance of cycle threshold data for months .
Dr. Michael Mina , a Harvard epidemiologist , told the New York Times , “ I would say that none ” of people testing positive with low cycle thresholds “ should be contact-traced , not one.
” “ It ’ s really irresponsible , I think , to forgo the recognition that this is a quantitative issue , ” he said .
In a peer-reviewed study from May , Mina and another Harvard researcher argued , “ particularly when testing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ... reporting the Ct value or range could help to better inform clinical decisions.
” A preprint article from the University of Oxford also states , “ infectivity is related to the date of onset of symptoms and cycle threshold level.
” Not validating “ viral culture ” of PCR samples “ will result in false positives with possible segregation of large numbers of people who are no longer infectious , ” the authors said .
Former Pfizer Vice President Dr. Mike Yeadon recently condemned large-scale PCR testing , due to what he @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we call a ‘ PCR false positive pseudo-epidemic.
’ ” The validity of PCR tests has been contested for reasons other than Ct issues .
An article in The BMJ has claimed that PCR nasal swabs have around 63 percent sensitivity .
The researchers denied that there is any “ gold standard ” for COVID-19 tests .
In November , the CDC highlighted a study showing that screening for coronavirus with a single PCR test may only catch 53 % of all positive cases .
Last week , a group of scientists demanded @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the main PCR protocol used for COVID-19 testing , as a peer-review report for the article has failed to materialize .

PCR, or polymerase chain reaction, is one of the most common COVID-19 testing methods and has been called the 'gold standard' by the government. Its reliability has come under fire repeatedly in recent weeks, including by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC).
December 4, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – An investigation by Just the News revealed that health departments in several states do not track key data used to determine the infectiousness of people who test positive for COVID-19 with PCR tests. Current testing protocol may mean that “many of the ‘positive’ test results recorded throughout the country… denote nothing more than fragments of dead COVID virus,” Just the News reported.
PCR, or polymerase chain reaction, is one of the most common COVID-19 testing methods and has been called the “gold standard” by the government. Its reliability has come under fire repeatedly in recent weeks, including by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC).
The PCR approach amplifies viral genetic material in order to detect whether or not patient samples contain COVID-19. The number of amplifications that a PCR test must create before it identifies an infection is called “cycle threshold” or Ct.
“There is a correlation between the Ct value and the amount of viral genetic material that was present in the specimen,” the CDC says. A high-cycle threshold could indicate that positive test results may be derived from a non-infectious person who doesn’t need to isolate.
— Article continues below Petition — PETITION: No to mandatory vaccination for the coronavirus Show Petition Text 1082415 have signed the petition. Let's get to 1100000 ! Thank you for signing this petition! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Country... State... Sign this Petition People of goodwill can disagree about the safety, efficacy and religious implications of a new vaccine for the coronavirus. But, everyone should agree on this point: No government can force anyone who has reached legal adulthood to be vaccinated for the coronavirus. Equally, no government can vaccinate minors for the coronavirus against the will of their parents or guardians. Please SIGN this urgent petition which urges policymakers at every level of government to reject calls for mandatory coronavirus vaccination. Fear of a disease - which we know very little about, relative to other similar diseases - must not lead to knee-jerk reactions regarding public health, nor can it justify supporting the hidden agenda of governmental as well as non-governmental bodies that have apparent conflicts of interest in plans to restrict personal freedoms. The so-called "public health experts" have gotten it wrong many times during the current crisis. We should not, therefore, allow their opinions to rush decision-makers into policies regarding vaccination. And, while some people, like Bill Gates, may have a lot of money, his opinion and that of his NGO (the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) - namely, that life will not return to normal till people are widely vaccinated - should not be permitted to influence policy decisions on a coronavirus vaccination program. Finally, we must also not allow the rush by pharmaceutical companies to produce a new coronavirus vaccine to, itself, become an imperative for vaccination. Unwitting citizens must not be used as guinea pigs for New World Order ideologues, or Big Pharma, in pursuit of a vaccine (and, profits) which may not even protect against future mutated strains of the coronavirus. And it goes without saying that the production of vaccines using aborted babies for cell replication is a total non-starter, as the technique is gravely immoral. However, if after sufficient study of the issue, a person who has reached the age of majority wishes to be vaccinated with a morally produced vaccine, along with his children, that is his business. But we cannot and will not permit the government to make that decision for us. Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this petition, urging policymakers at all levels of government to reject mandatory coronavirus vaccination. FOR MORE INFORMATION: Bill Gates: Life won’t go back to ‘normal’ until population 'widely vaccinated' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bill-gates-life-wont-go-back-to-normal-until-population-widely-vaccinated COVID-19 scare leads to more digital surveillance, talk of mandatory vaccine 'tattoos' for kids' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/covid-19-scare-leads-to-more-digital-surveillance-talk-of-mandatory-vaccine-tattoos-for-kids Trudeau says no return to ‘normal’ without vaccine: 'Could take 12 to 18 months' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trudeau-says-no-return-to-normal-without-vaccine-could-take-12-to-18-months Trudeau mulls making coronavirus vaccine mandatory for Canadians - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trudeau-mulls-making-coronavirus-vaccine-mandatory-for-canadians US bishop vows to ‘refuse’ COVID-19 vaccine if made from ‘aborted fetal tissue' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-bishop-vows-to-refuse-covid-19-vaccine-if-made-from-aborted-fetal-tissue ** While LifeSite opposes immorally-produced vaccines using aborted fetal cell lines, we do not have a position on any particular coronavirus vaccines produced without such moral problems. We realize many have general concerns about vaccines, but also recognize that millions of lives have been saved due to vaccines. *** Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com Hide Petition Text Sign this Petition
In an interview over the summer, Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said, for a sample with “a cycle threshold of 35 or more,” “the chances of it being replication-confident are minuscule.” If the sample has more than a threshold of “37, 38, even 36,” “it's just dead nucleotides, period,” he told listeners.
A report by the New York Times published in August noted that “[m]ost tests set the limit at 40, a few at 37. This means that you are positive for the coronavirus if the test process required up to 40 cycles, or 37, to detect the virus.” Researchers quoted in the article advised that “[a] more reasonable cutoff would be 30 to 35” “or even less,” the newspaper said.
“Those changes would mean the amount of genetic material in a patient’s sample would have to be 100-fold to 1,000-fold that of the current standard for the test to return a positive result… worth acting on,” they stated. Three sets of testing data processed by officials in New York, Massachusetts, and Nevada showed that “90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus,” according to the report.
Just the News contacted health departments in every state about cycle threshold data, finding that many simply don’t monitor it. “Overwhelmingly, health officials responded that they are more or less unaware of the cycle thresholds from the vast majority of tests occurring in their states,” Just the News reported.
An official from the Pennsylvania Department of Health told Just the News, “We do not get any cycle thresholds from any laboratories.” A representative of California’s health department similarly related, “The state does not maintain these values because it does not receive these from reporting labs.” The director of the Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services admitted, “This information is not tracked by the Kentucky Department for Public Health.”
Officials from at least eight other states provided Just the News with statements denying that they keep track of the cycle threshold information from PCR tests.
“Many of the health officials qualified their responses with caveats about PCR tests and threshold data,” Just the News reported. For example, the administrator of Hawaii’s state laboratory said, “CT values depend on the chemistry used, the instrument used, and the nucleic acid extraction method used.”
He added, “there are many sources of variability.”
Nevertheless, medical experts besides Fauci have extolled the importance of cycle threshold data for months. Dr. Michael Mina, a Harvard epidemiologist, told the New York Times, “I would say that none” of people testing positive with low cycle thresholds “should be contact-traced, not one.” “It’s really irresponsible, I think, to forgo the recognition that this is a quantitative issue,” he said.
In a peer-reviewed study from May, Mina and another Harvard researcher argued, “particularly when testing in the absence of symptoms for COVID-19 … reporting the Ct value or range could help to better inform clinical decisions.”
A preprint article from the University of Oxford also states, “infectivity is related to the date of onset of symptoms and cycle threshold level.” Not validating “viral culture” of PCR samples “will result in false positives with possible segregation of large numbers of people who are no longer infectious,” the authors said. Former Pfizer Vice President Dr. Mike Yeadon recently condemned large-scale PCR testing, due to what he called “a severe risk of what we call a ‘PCR false positive pseudo-epidemic.’”
The validity of PCR tests has been contested for reasons other than Ct issues. An article in The BMJ has claimed that PCR nasal swabs have around 63 percent sensitivity. The researchers denied that there is any “gold standard” for COVID-19 tests.
In November, the CDC highlighted a study showing that screening for coronavirus with a single PCR test may only catch 53% of all positive cases. Last week, a group of scientists demanded the retraction of the original article describing the main PCR protocol used for COVID-19 testing, as a peer-review report for the article has failed to materialize.
Share


lifesitenews--2020-12-04--COVID-hyper PM Trudeau supports anti-gov’t protests in India but not in Canada

CANADA , December 4 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) – Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is speaking out in support of Indian farmers ’ right to peacefully protest despite having Canadians arrested and fined for doing just that .
Trudeau was the first world leader to come out in support of the Indian farmers ’ strike currently happening in Dehli .
“ Canada will always be there to defend the right of peaceful protest , ” he said .
New proposed agricultural legislation would seek to deregulate crop pricing in India , but local farmers are concerned they will be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Trudeau voiced his concerns during a virtual birthday celebration for Guru Nanak Dev Ji , the founder of Sikhism .
“ We believe in the importance of dialogue and that 's why we 've reached out through multiple means directly to the Indian authorities to highlight our concerns , ” he said .
At the same time , Canadians are being fined and arrested for exercising their right to peaceful protest as extreme restrictions have been once again imposed throughout the country with the government giving “ cases ” of COVID-19 as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hillier has been charged after hosting two anti-lockdown rallies outside Queen ’ s Park and will appear in court on January 7 , while a 32-year-old woman has also been fined for organizing a peaceful protest attended by over 100 people while outdoor gathering restrictions in Ontario are limited to ten people .
Both Hillier and the woman face fines between $ 10,000 - $ 100,000 .
In Saskatoon a man was fined $ 2,800 for helping to organize an anti-mask protest , while Manitoba Premier Brian Pallister reprimanded those who attended an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ getting fines in their mailboxes .
Also in Manitoba , Springs Church defied public health restrictions that said church services could only be done virtually , hosting four large “ drive-in ” services which were attended by hundreds .
Manitoban police are now monitoring churches , and in at least one case at the Church of God Restoration have blocked the parking lot off to the faithful and fined the church $ 5,000 .
In Calgary last week ’ s Walk for Freedom was attended by roughly 300 people , in violation of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gatherings .
Police were present but did not hand out fines , saying they want to take an educational approach .
While Canada has 394,000 confirmed COVID-19 cases , India has over 9.4 million , further highlighting Trudeau ’ s duplicity .

'Canada will always be there to defend the right of peaceful protest,' he said. Meanwhile, in Canada, anti-lockdown protestors face fines and even arrest.
CANADA, December 4, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is speaking out in support of Indian farmers’ right to peacefully protest despite having Canadians arrested and fined for doing just that.
Trudeau was the first world leader to come out in support of the Indian farmers’ strike currently happening in Dehli.
“Canada will always be there to defend the right of peaceful protest,” he said.
— Article continues below Petition — PETITION: Reject government control of the internet in Canada Show Petition Text 6569 have signed the petition. Let's get to 7500 ! Thank you for signing this petition! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Country... State... Sign this Petition Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government has introduced a bill which threatens to seize control of online media content in Canada, putting liberty and freedom at risk. But, the Trudeau Liberals have no right to impose their party's ideology on the Canadian internet! Please SIGN this petition which tells the Trudeau Liberals, as well as the opposition, to leave the internet as a free speech zone! Bill C-10 is causing alarm bells to sound with conservative and Christians, who are concerned that it is the first step towards the destruction of independent online media in Canada. The Bill would require more "diversity and inclusion" content, reflecting the experience of "Canadians from racialized communities and Canadians of diverse ethnocultural backgrounds, socio-economic statuses, abilities and disabilities, sexual orientations, gender identities and expressions, and ages." And, Bill C-10 would also give power to the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) to "assign penalties for non-compliance." With this frightening new power, Bill C-10 is a real threat to the freedom of speech of conservatives and Christians in Canada who engage with the entire world about their issues on the internet. Jay Cameron, a lawyer for the Canada-based Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms told LifeSite: "It is clear from recent statements by the PM and the Heritage Minister that the federal government wants to increase control and penalties for speech and content that is not approved of by the ideologues in the Liberal Party. Unsurprisingly, the purpose of Bill C-10 is not to increase freedom of ‘thought, belief, opinion, and expression’ (section 2(b) of the Charter) but to further restrict it.". Simply put: the chilling effect that this Bill could have on freedom of speech rights is incalculable. Please SIGN and SHARE this petition which tells Trudeau Liberals to stop their attempt to impose their party's ideology on the Canadian internet. Tell them to scrap Bill C-10 and leave the internet as an independent forum where ideas, beliefs and other ventures can be discussed without government regulation or censorship. And, tell them that Canadian adults are mature enough to make up their own minds about sensitive topics without government interference. After you have signed the petition, please consider politely contacting the Minister for Canadian Heritage, the Shadow Minister for Industry and Economic Development, and the Prime Minister's office, to tell them about your dismay regarding Bill C-10. CONTACT DETAILS BELOW. Thank you! FOR MORE INFORMATION: 'Trudeau government introduces bill to force online media companies to push liberal content' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trudeau-government-introduces-bill-to-force-online-media-companies-to-push-liberal-content Steven Guilbeault - Minister of Canadian Heritage Telephone: 819-997-7788 Email: [email protected] Alain Rayes - Opposition Shadow Cabinet - Canadian Heritage, Official Languages & Quebec Economic Development Telephone: 819-751-1375; Email: [email protected] Justin Trudeau - Office of the Prime Minister Fax: 613-941-6900 [email protected] https://pm.gc.ca/en/connect/contact Hide Petition Text Sign this Petition
New proposed agricultural legislation would seek to deregulate crop pricing in India, but local farmers are concerned they will be left at the mercy of large corporations.
Trudeau voiced his concerns during a virtual birthday celebration for Guru Nanak Dev Ji, the founder of Sikhism.
“We believe in the importance of dialogue and that's why we've reached out through multiple means directly to the Indian authorities to highlight our concerns,” he said.
At the same time, Canadians are being fined and arrested for exercising their right to peaceful protest as extreme restrictions have been once again imposed throughout the country with the government giving “cases” of COVID-19 as the reason.
Ontario Independent MPP Randy Hillier has been charged after hosting two anti-lockdown rallies outside Queen’s Park and will appear in court on January 7, while a 32-year-old woman has also been fined for organizing a peaceful protest attended by over 100 people while outdoor gathering restrictions in Ontario are limited to ten people.
Both Hillier and the woman face fines between $10,000 – $100,000.
In Saskatoon a man was fined $2,800 for helping to organize an anti-mask protest, while Manitoba Premier Brian Pallister reprimanded those who attended an anti-lockdown rally, sending they will be getting fines in their mailboxes.
Also in Manitoba, Springs Church defied public health restrictions that said church services could only be done virtually, hosting four large “drive-in” services which were attended by hundreds.
Manitoban police are now monitoring churches, and in at least one case at the Church of God Restoration have blocked the parking lot off to the faithful and fined the church $5,000.
In Calgary last week’s Walk for Freedom was attended by roughly 300 people, in violation of Alberta’s 10-person limit for outdoor gatherings.
Police were present but did not hand out fines, saying they want to take an educational approach.
While Canada has 394,000 confirmed COVID-19 cases, India has over 9.4 million, further highlighting Trudeau’s duplicity.
WATCH: Trudeau comments on large groups of farmers protesting in India: “Canada will always be there to defend the right of peaceful protest”. pic.twitter.com/L3P3z0IrNJ — The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) December 1, 2020
This is the scene this morning outside Church of God Restoration just south of Steinbach. The church, attempting to hold a service in contravention of Public Health Orders. Full details on the way tonight on CityNews At 6:00. pic.twitter.com/w1ZFnXQMvx — Jonas (@JonasCityNews) November 29, 2020
Police have an update about today’s Walk For Freedom in Calgary. They say no tickets were issued, no official enforcement was conducted. But they say moving forward there will be strategic enforcement — as they don’t expect this rally to be the last https://t.co/xPgDwolymi pic.twitter.com/NxzQIjVgKm — Helen Pike (@helenipike) November 29, 2020
Share


lifesitenews--2020-12-04--Georgia governor calls for auditing ballot signatures after suspicious counting video emerges

December 4 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) — Georgia Republican Gov .
Brian Kemp declared his support for auditing the signatures of mail ballots Thursday evening , amid ongoing national pressure to do more to investigate alleged fraud in the presidential election .
“ I called early on for a signature audit .
Obviously , the Secretary of State [ Brad Raffensperger ] , per the laws of the Constitution , would have to order that , ” Kemp told Fox News ’ Laura Ingraham .
“ He has not done that .
I think it should be done .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ There needs to be transparency on that .
Hopefully , in the next 24 hours , we ’ ll see a lot more.
” “ Hopefully , the secretary of state will update us on exactly what was going on , ” the governor continued .
“ I have heard they had a monitor there .
I think it would be good for him to come out and say exactly what was going on .
But I think this also gives him an opportunity to really look at specifically … the Fulton County @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to make sure that that recount has been done in the right way and that we know if these were ballots , were they counted correctly and if there were signatures on that.
” Kemp ’ s comments follow the release of a video at a Georgia Senate hearing which President Donald Trump ’ s legal team says depicts ballots being pulled out from under a table and counted late at night , after the press and Republican observers were sent home .
One of the Trump legal team ’ s witnesses estimates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to 6,000 ballots apiece , for a potential total of 24,000 votes – almost double the margin by which Biden beat President Donald Trump in the state .
A purported “ debunking ” from “ fact-checking ” website Lead Stories ( which is known for labeling accurate stories as “ hoaxes ” ) quotes several Georgia election officials insisting that the footage on the video is not unusual , and an assurance from Georgia Secretary of State ’ s Office chief investigator Frances Watson : “ Nobody told [ reporters or partisan observers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to leave .
Nobody gave them any advice on what they should do .
And It [ sic ] was still open for them or the public to come back in to view at whatever time they wanted to , as long as they were still working.
” Lead Stories also says an unidentified election board monitor claims he was present to watch the work from 11:52 PM until 12:45 AM , after the Trump team says observers were sent away , though his anonymity , including his party affiliation , means his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that Republican observers were sent home .
Further , the “ fact-check ” does not explain the discrepancy between Walton ’ s claims and original reporting from Election Night , such as an ABC News report that Fulton County public affairs manager for elections Regina Waller confirmed “ that the election department sent the State Farm Arena absentee ballot counters home at 10:30 p.m. , ” ostensibly due to a burst water pipe .
Georgia has become a focal point for the battle over election fraud , due in large part to alleged @ @ @ @ @ @ @ procedures , and partly due to the fact that two of its races , which will decide control of the U.S. Senate , have yet to be decided .
Kemp faces intense national pressure to call a special session of the state legislature to address election fraud , in hopes of both flipping the state for Trump and shoring up potential vulnerabilities to fraud in time for the Senate runoff elections on January 5 .

PETITION UPDATE (1/15/2021) -
The events of the past month, and especially the past 10 days, have shaken the faith Americans have in their elected and appoint officials.
We continue to call for investigations to be made into allegations of election fraud. Texas is in the process of prosecuting one political operative for illegal ballot harvesting, and multiple state legislatures have called for investigations, too.
However, the judiciary has severely let down the American electorate.
As we have said all along, the integrity of the election is much bigger than President Trump. Election integrity is at the heart of republican democracy, and if we don't have it, we no longer have a functioning republic.
Therefore, we continue to seek the truth for the election outcome. Perhaps that will only be known in the future when state or federal commissions are established to investigate the instances of election fraud which were witnessed and sworn to, by thousands of Americans of all political persuasions.
In the meantime, you may still sign this petition. Thank you!
___________________________________________________________________
PETITION UPDATE (12/10/20) -
On Wednesday, President Trump tweeted: "We will be INTERVENING in the Texas (plus many other states) case. This is the big one. Our Country needs a victory!"
He is referring to the lawsuit which the state of Texas has filed against Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Georgia in the Supreme Court over changes those states made to their election rules, claiming they violated the U.S. Constitution in the process.
Here is the central part of the argument: if Texas were to allow possible voter fraud to go unchecked in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Georgia, it would be akin to committing fraud upon the people of Texas, who cast their ballots within the framework of the law.
Indeed, this would apply equally to all citizens who voted within the framework of the law across the United States!
President Trump also tweeted that this case is, "very strong...ALL CRITERIA MET."
Please continue to SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition, now.
____________________________________________________________________
PETITION UPDATE (12/7/20) - Since this petition was launched, President Trump's legal team, as well as other concerned citizens, have discovered what appears to be irrefutable evidence of voter fraud in several of the key battleground states, and have initiated legal challenges in six states.
While the situation continues to evolve, this remains a hugely important petition which we encourage you to SIGN and SHARE.
Below, please WATCH and READ about the mounting evidence of voter fraud and how the mainstream media seem determined to ignore even the most egregious instances of vote tampering. Then, please SIGN and SHARE this petition.
'Trump: ‘Our election system is now under assault and siege’ and as president I must defend it'
'Tens of thousands 2020 election votes illegally scanned in Detroit, says Dominion IT contractor'
'Trump campaign files lawsuit demanding ‘a new statewide election for president’ in Georgia'
'Experts flag over 500k ballots in PA with new evidence of major 2020 election voter fraud'
''Smoking gun'? Pennsylvania vote fraud hearing gets gasps from audience'
'FBI and Justice Department have dragged their feet investigating 2020 vote fraud'
''CNN top brass in leaked tape: We won't give Trump 'too much of a platform on his not conceding'
'Twitter censored Trump 63 times over Thanksgiving holiday, Biden untouched'
LifeSite supports President Trump with this petition because we believe he is trying to defend the Constitution, ensuring that electoral fraud does not taint the result of the 2020 general election.
But, since starting this petition, we have launched a separate petition related to the disputed election outcome, calling on the Department of Justice to 'do their job' and engage in meaningful investigations of the mounting evidence of voter fraud.
We believe that conducting forensic audits of ballots and voting machines, as well as issuing subpoenas to collect more evidence, would be a good start.
Thankfully, some of the state started to demand investigations independent of federal agencies. But we still believe that the DoJ needs to use its enormous fact-finding resources to help resolve allegations of election fraud.
Thank you for continuing to SIGN and SHARE all our election-related petitions.
_____________________________________________________________________
Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition which calls on all Americans to Stand With President Trump as he uses every legitimate means to find out if voter fraud played any role in the election outcome.
Amid allegations of voter fraud, and at a time when the situation with COVID has been used by many of the states to facilitate the use of mail-in ballots on a massive scale, we need to be very careful in dismissing the possibility of voter fraud.
The fact is, the possibility of wide-spread fraud with mail-in ballots is significant.
But, this is not about Donald Trump or Joe Biden! This about whether or not the sanctity of the ballot box has been tampered with!
Please Stand With President Trump as he attempts to defend the integrity of this election, as well as well as the right to vote itself!
Indeed, this is so important, not so much because one election hangs in the balance, but because our democracy, itself, hangs in the balance.
Americans not only have a right to know, but should demand that every legitimate means be used to discover the truth about these elections!
Please SIGN this petition and Stand With President Trump to ensure that these elections were conducted freely and fairly!
While most all Americans believe in playing by the rules, we also know that some very devious, politically-motivated operatives have been trying to harm the Trump administration from before he even took the oath of office.
This fact should lead us to question how some allegations of voter fraud can be so easily dismissed by state election authorities.
We demand to know the truth, and, for the sake of our democracy, we demand that President Trump keep fighting to learn the truth.
Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this petition today!
**Photo Credit: Shealah Craighead / White House / Flickr


lifesitenews--2020-12-04--Argentines take to the streets in over 500 cities to protest pro-abortion bill

BUENOS AIRES , Argentina , December 4 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) — Thousands of pro-life Argentines in over 500 cities took to the streets on Nov. 28 in protest of a bill that would legalize elective abortion up to 14 weeks after conception .
The bill , which was initiated by President Alberto Fernández , states that “ Women and those with other gender identities who are able to get pregnant have the right to decide to terminate a pregnancy within 14 weeks of gestation.
” Currently , women in Argentina can only get abortions in the case of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ health is in danger , in accordance with a law first passed in 1920 .
Demonstrators displayed signs with messages such as “ Abortion = Genocide , ” “ It is not lawful to kill an innocent , ” and “ Let ’ s save the two lives.
” Many sported blue neckerchiefs or masks , and waved blue banners and poster paper .
In Argentina , the pro-life movement is represented by the color blue , while the color green signifies the pro-abortion movement .
One sign read , “ There are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we are the blue majority , ” according to the Catholic News Agency .
Protestors even displayed an enormous sculpture made in the likeness of an unborn baby .
“ This will be the ninth time in majority-Catholic Argentina — homeland of Pope Francis — that a bill to legalize abortion has been presented in parliament , ” reported Agence France-Presse .
In a video posted by the march ’ s organizers , Agustín Laje said that “ dismissing human rights begins by dismissing the right to life.
” When asked why the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the Argentine Pro-Life Unity organization explained that the Fernández administration “ wants to fast track the legalization of abortion , turning its back on the majority of the Argentine people , and so we want to express our disgust with that move , ” reported ACI Prensa , CNA ’ s Spanish language news partner .
“ Those whom they want to kill with this law are future Argentines , compatriots , citizens of our country , ” Dr. María José Mancino , president of Doctors for Life Argentina , told ACI @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Argentina said that “ what citizens are calling for is to respect the will of the people in face of a government that promotes the abortion agenda according to the interests or requirements of the International Monetary Fund , calling them rights or sexual and reproductive health.
” In an email to ACI Prensa , former congresswoman Cynthia Hotton said the abortion bill is intended to “ divide society and distract.
” “ The president is hiding the failure of the public health system , poverty and the economy behind this initiative , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fed up with the lies and the political manipulation of everything : from the pandemic and the land seizures , to the farewell given to Diego Maradona .
The outcome is always the same : following the incompetency , the people are the ones who suffer the most .
With abortion , the same thing happens .
People are tired of the green neckerchief as the panacea to all the problems of women and of society , ” Hotton continued .
“ The green neckerchief seems to be for Alberto Fernández the only @ @ @ @ @

‘Those whom they want to kill with this law are future Argentines, compatriots, citizens of our country,’ said Dr. María José Mancino, president of Doctors for Life Argentina.
BUENOS AIRES, Argentina, December 4, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — Thousands of pro-life Argentines in over 500 cities took to the streets on Nov. 28 in protest of a bill that would legalize elective abortion up to 14 weeks after conception.
The bill, which was initiated by President Alberto Fernández, states that “Women and those with other gender identities who are able to get pregnant have the right to decide to terminate a pregnancy within 14 weeks of gestation.”
Currently, women in Argentina can only get abortions in the case of rape, or when their life or health is in danger, in accordance with a law first passed in 1920.
Demonstrators displayed signs with messages such as “Abortion = Genocide,” “It is not lawful to kill an innocent,” and “Let’s save the two lives.”
Many sported blue neckerchiefs or masks, and waved blue banners and poster paper. In Argentina, the pro-life movement is represented by the color blue, while the color green signifies the pro-abortion movement. One sign read, “There are more of us who defend life, we are the blue majority,” according to the Catholic News Agency.
Protestors even displayed an enormous sculpture made in the likeness of an unborn baby.
“This will be the ninth time in majority-Catholic Argentina — homeland of Pope Francis — that a bill to legalize abortion has been presented in parliament,” reported Agence France-Presse.
In a video posted by the march’s organizers, Agustín Laje said that “dismissing human rights begins by dismissing the right to life.”
When asked why the Argentine people were protesting, Camila Duro of the Argentine Pro-Life Unity organization explained that the Fernández administration “wants to fast track the legalization of abortion, turning its back on the majority of the Argentine people, and so we want to express our disgust with that move,” reported ACI Prensa, CNA’s Spanish language news partner.
“Those whom they want to kill with this law are future Argentines, compatriots, citizens of our country,” Dr. María José Mancino, president of Doctors for Life Argentina, told ACI Prensa.
Raúl Magnasco from Más Vida Argentina said that “what citizens are calling for is to respect the will of the people in face of a government that promotes the abortion agenda according to the interests or requirements of the International Monetary Fund, calling them rights or sexual and reproductive health.”
— Article continues below Petition — PETITION: Defend our right to "Choose Life"! Show Petition Text 11454 have signed the petition. Let's get to 12500 ! Thank you for signing this petition! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Country... State... Sign this Petition States are blocking pro-lifers from sharing the simple message “Choose Life” on their vehicles! Please SIGN this joint petition between LifeSite and The Children First Foundation to make "Choose Life" license plates available in every state! Tell governors and state officials to allow this pro-life freedom of speech. Advertising industry statistics show that, for the typical vehicle, a “Choose Life” plate and its simple, powerful message will be seen by other drivers 30,000 to 80,000 times a year. And, across the U.S., “Choose Life” vehicle license plates (or tags) have raised more than $28 million for pro-life pregnancy centers, maternity homes, safe havens, and adoption centers, varying with each state. The potential for expanding the “Choose Life” license plate program to new states and new members is incredible – but only if citizens are allowed to have the plates! It is appalling that seventeen U.S. states do not allow their citizens the right to put “Choose Life” license plates on their vehicles. The plates have been called pro-life “scare tactics” by Planned Parenthood and unlawful or hateful “private speech” by pro-abortion lawyers. The “Choose Life” message, however, is one of pure love that scares nobody except those who profit from death. It is unacceptable that we are blocked from our God-given and Constitutional right to spread the message of love and life for vulnerable unborn and newborn children. Your signature on this petition – no matter where you live – will help to get the “Choose Life” license plate program in states where it is not yet permitted! Please SIGN and SHARE this petition to make a real difference in persuading these state governments and Departments of Motor Vehicles to “Choose Life.” Consider, for example, our experience in New York, where Governor Andrew Cuomo is a nationally-recognized advocate of abortion and has been a relentless opponent of the pro-life movement. Cuomo has blocked the approval of “Choose Life” license plates in NY, despite widespread support for these truly positive messages of love and life. A headline in the New York Post declared, “The DMV Acts Like We Live in Pyongyang.” And, in nearby New Jersey and Connecticut, similar hurdles were faced. But we took the fight to the government officials and even to federal court. And, with the help of petitions, we were able to get “Choose Life” license plates on the road in both states. It is high time for us to convert EVERY state in America to choose life. Your signature on this petition - no matter where you live - will help make that happen by placing “Choose Life” license plates on tens of thousands more cars. For love, for life, for the babies, please SIGN and SHARE our worldwide petition to tell state officials and politicians to stop blocking approval of the “Choose Life” license plate! FOR MORE INFORMATION: Please click on this link to read many past LifeSite articles on "Choose Life" license plates: https://www.lifesitenews.com/tags/tag/choose+life+plates Hide Petition Text Sign this Petition
In an email to ACI Prensa, former congresswoman Cynthia Hotton said the abortion bill is intended to “divide society and distract.”
“The president is hiding the failure of the public health system, poverty and the economy behind this initiative,” she said.
“People are fed up with the lies and the political manipulation of everything: from the pandemic and the land seizures, to the farewell given to Diego Maradona. The outcome is always the same: following the incompetency, the people are the ones who suffer the most. With abortion, the same thing happens. People are tired of the green neckerchief as the panacea to all the problems of women and of society,” Hotton continued.
“The green neckerchief seems to be for Alberto Fernández the only flag left standing.”
Share


lifesitenews--2020-12-04--After months of lockdown UK govt moves towards telling us when we can have kids

December 4 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) – Since March the U.K. government and governments all over the world have been telling us things like : when we can leave the house , when we can go to work , when we can visit our loved ones , when we can get married , when we can go to church , and when we can receive the sacraments .
In many instances they have told us that we can ’ t do any number of these things at all for a given period of time .
And now , months @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we needed “ two weeks to flatten the curve , ” the U.K. government has begun moving towards telling people when they can and can ’ t have children .
After announcing the approval of a COVID-19 vaccine by Pfizer earlier this week , the government has published safety instructions for the vaccine .
Health Secretary Matt Hancock described the Pfizer vaccine as “ the dawn…lifting all of the gloom ” in a televised interview this week .
So let ’ s take a look at one of the aspects of the government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ supposed “ gloom-lifting dawn.
” “ For women of childbearing age , pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination , ” the instructions state .
The guide also advises that women should avoid becoming pregnant for the first two months after their second shot .
“ In addition , women of childbearing age should be advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose , ” it says .
The U.K. has ordered 40 million doses of this vaccine ( which requires two doses per recipient ) .
The U.S. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ don ’ t know yet exactly how the roll-out of this vaccine will work and what sort of pressure will be brought to bear on people to take it .
We do know that the U.K. government and governments around the world want as many people as possible to take a COVID-19 vaccine .
As recently as November 16 , Hancock said that the government would not rule out mandatory vaccines , even if it was not proposing it at the moment .
And we also know this – the U.K. government says @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you receive the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine , and you should avoid pregnancy for two months after your second jab .
What next ?

According to the UK government, 'women of childbearing age should be advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose' of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine
December 4, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – Since March the U.K. government and governments all over the world have been telling us things like: when we can leave the house, when we can go to work, when we can visit our loved ones, when we can get married, when we can go to church, and when we can receive the sacraments. In many instances they have told us that we can’t do any number of these things at all for a given period of time.
And now, months and months after we were told that we needed “two weeks to flatten the curve,” the U.K. government has begun moving towards telling people when they can and can’t have children.
After announcing the approval of a COVID-19 vaccine by Pfizer earlier this week, the government has published safety instructions for the vaccine. Health Secretary Matt Hancock described the Pfizer vaccine as “the dawn…lifting all of the gloom” in a televised interview this week.
So let’s take a look at one of the aspects of the government’s own safety instructions for this supposed “gloom-lifting dawn.”
“For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination,” the instructions state.
The guide also advises that women should avoid becoming pregnant for the first two months after their second shot.
“In addition, women of childbearing age should be advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose,” it says.
The U.K. has ordered 40 million doses of this vaccine (which requires two doses per recipient). The U.S. has ordered 100 million doses.
We don’t know yet exactly how the roll-out of this vaccine will work and what sort of pressure will be brought to bear on people to take it. We do know that the U.K. government and governments around the world want as many people as possible to take a COVID-19 vaccine. As recently as November 16, Hancock said that the government would not rule out mandatory vaccines, even if it was not proposing it at the moment. And we also know this – the U.K. government says you shouldn’t be pregnant when you receive the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, and you should avoid pregnancy for two months after your second jab. What next?
— Article continues below Petition — PETITION: No to government and corporate penalties for refusing COVID-19 vaccine Show Petition Text 103183 have signed the petition. Let's get to 125000 ! Thank you for signing this petition! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Country... State... Sign this Petition **Photo credit: Shutterstock.com Mainstream media sources are promoting offensive suggestions by some doctors that people who refuse a vaccine for COVID-19 should be "punished" by the government and by business - effectively coercing them into taking the vaccine. One group of doctors writing in 'USA Today' suggested that the government impose special taxes (i.e., fines) on people who refuse the vaccination and that business simply refuse to serve them. [see story below]
Another doctor writing in an online publication called 'The Conversation' shamelessly suggested that people who refuse a vaccine should be given a psychoactive drug to induce compliance. [see story below] But, these suggestions are plain political posturing, and have nothing to do with science or with the recent trends of the disease. And, in case they haven't noticed, we live in a democracy not a medical dictatorship! Please SIGN this urgent petition which asks policy-makers and business people, at all levels, to pledge to respect the rights of those who, in good conscience, decide not to vaccinate themselves or their children. People should not have to live in fear of governmental or corporate retribution for refusing a vaccine which is being rushed to market by Big Pharma and their fellow-travelers in NGOs, like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. It would be intolerable and immoral for the government or business to coerce someone, and their family, to take a COVID vaccine against their will to avoid a fine, or just so they can do their weekly grocery shopping. Medical freedom must be respected in principle and also in practice. So, it is now time that our policy-makers listen to all voices involved in this vital conversation, and start to represent those who will not tolerate being punished for refusing a vaccine. Simply put, legislatures must begin to act as legislatures again. Questions must be asked. Hearings and investigations must be held. And, the legislatures of each state and country must return to the business of representing the people who voted for them, assuming their rightful place as the originator of legislation. We can no longer accept the dictates of executive branches without question, especially now that, statistically speaking, the initial brunt of the COVID crisis has passed. Neither can we accept the dictates of doctors who seem detached from reality and from science, and who only seem to be attached to the idea of promoting ideas which contribute to the agrandizement of power and control of political interests, and wealth of those who stand to make a lot of money from the sale of a COVID vaccine. Please SIGN this urgent petition which asks government and business leaders to pledge to respect the rights of those who refuse a COVID vaccine, and not seek to punish them for doing so. FOR MORE INFORMATION: 'Doctors lay out plan to ‘punish’ people who refuse coronavirus vaccine: ‘There is no alternative’' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/doctors-lay-out-plan-to-punish-people-who-refuse-coronavirus-vaccine-there-is-no-alternative 'US professor: ‘Psychoactive pill’ should be covertly administered to ensure lockdown compliance' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-professor-ensure-lockdown-compliance-by-drugging-dissenters-with-psychoactive-pill Hide Petition Text Sign this Petition
Follow Paul Paul Smeaton is Editorial Director for LifeSiteNews and is based near London, England. He has previously worked for the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) in England. Paul has been active in pro-life and Catholic communities since his university days at Campion College Australia.
Share


lifesitenews--2020-12-04--Facebook ramps up censorship, ‘will start removing false claims’ about COVID vaccine

Big Tech is censoring us .
Subscribe to our email list and bookmark LifeSiteNews.com to continue getting our news .
Subscribe now .
MENLO PARK , California , December 4 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) — Social media giant Facebook has announced it will be removing any posts regarding the upcoming COVID-19 vaccines from its platforms if the information is deemed to be “ false.
” The press release issued yesterday states that “ [ g ] iven the recent news that COVID-19 vaccines will soon be rolling out around the world , over the coming weeks we will start @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have been debunked by public health experts on Facebook and Instagram .
This is another way that we are applying our policy to remove misinformation about the virus that could lead to imminent physical harm.
” The “ public health experts ” are not named .
However , the website where the press release was published also contains a video of Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg interviewing Dr. Anthony Fauci , the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease ( NIAID ) and President Donald Trump ’ s top advisor during @ @ @ @ @ @ @ might be considered an authority on “ false claims ” about vaccines .
Fauci has previously suggested that “ a degree of normality ” akin to that which existed before the coronavirus crisis would only be reached by the end of 2021 .
Facebook ’ s press release outlined the kinds of posts and statements which will be removed , promising to delete “ false claims about the safety , efficacy , ingredients or side effects of the vaccines .
For example , we will remove false claims that COVID-19 vaccines contain microchips @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t on the official vaccine ingredient list.
” Thoughts or suggestions deemed to be “ conspiracy theories ” will also be removed .
It is unclear when the enforcement will begin precisely , with Facebook mentioning that the promised cull will not begin “ overnight.
” Beyond removing posts , Facebook additionally promised to promote its own news , as sourced via its COVID-19 Information Center .
The promised censorship from the Big Tech company comes in the wake of hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee , where senators grilled both Facebook founder @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and CEO Jack Dorsey about the issue of censorship .
At the time , Sen. Josh Hawley ( R-MO ) questioned Zuckerberg regarding information he had received from a whistleblower stating that Big Tech companies collaborated in censorship and that “ Facebook has an internal platform to manage it.
” Using that platform , Facebook employees “ discuss which individuals , or hashtags , or websites to ban , ” Hawley said .
The senator also quizzed Zuckerberg about Centra , a tool used by the company “ to track its users not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ internet.
” Replying as to how many accounts in the United States had been shut down using the program , Zuckerberg said , “ I ’ m not familiar with the name of that tool.
” Closing his questions , Hawley gave a summary of the relation between the Big Tech companies and their influence upon citizens : “ What we have here is clear evidence of coordination between Twitter , Google and Facebook .
Mr. Zuckerberg knows he has the tools to track this , but he either doesn ’ t remember @ @ @ @ @ @ @ us see it.
” President Trump recently confirmed that he would veto the National Defense Authorization Act ( NDAA ) , the annual defense-spending bill , unless it does away with Section 230 , which provides indemnity to Big Tech companies .

PETITION UPDATE (12/11/2020)
Right before Thanksgiving, YouTube deleted a LifeSite video of a distinguished Canadian physician protesting the "unfounded public hysteria" over COVID-19 and accused us of spreading "medical misinformation."
Our account was suspended, and we were prohibited from posting videos on our YouTube channel for one week. And, while that may not seem like a big deal, it's a huge deal for a news organization like LifeSite.
Then, earlier this week, YouTube again suspended our account – this time for two weeks – over an episode of The Bishop Strickland Show wherein Bishop Strickland said he would not take an unethical COVID-19 vaccine.
We were able to appeal the suspension, and our request was granted.
This means that in YouTube's three-strikes-and-you're-out content-policing, idea-cleansing scheme, we are back down to one strike. But, we still face the threat of losing our account permanently.
And, we're not the only ones.
In a recent turn of events, YouTube just announced that it will remove videos alleging widespread voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election.
But, what is YouTube afraid of? The truth???
Thankfully, however, there is a one, big bright spot on the horizon: 48 states filed suit against Facebook just this week.
And, although this seems like a step in the right direction, the draconian measures which YouTube just rolled out, which are already wielded by Twitter, are an assault against free speech.
So, the fight for freedom of speech against Big Tech goes on. And, we must do everything we can to protect it!
Please SIGN and SHARE this petition today!
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-youtube-reverses-ban-on-lifesitenews?
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/youtube-bans-lifesite-over-video-of-bp-strickland-refusing-to-take-corona-vaccine
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/lifesites-channel-was-suspended-by-youtube-heres-how-you-can-still-watch-our-videos
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/youtube-starts-removing-videos-that-contain-allegations-of-mass-voter-fraud
https://tennesseestar.com/2020/12/10/facebook-sued-by-48-states-federal-trade-commission-over-allegations-of-monopolistic-practices/
________________________________________________________________________
PETITION UPDATE (11/18/2020)
Everyone thought the censorship by Big Tech corporations would decrease after the 2020 election, but the truth is that censorship is being felt just as much as it was before the election.
And, given the election outcome, perhaps Big Tech censorship now is even more consequential than it was before the election!
The two biggest social media platforms, Facebook and Twitter, and other Big Tech companies, are still censoring and suppressing stories and posts favorable to conservatives, and especially anything that has to do with election fraud.
Here are a few recent examples:
Women for America First organized the March for Trump on November 14, which was shut down by Facebook, MailChimp and Eventbrite. Despite Big Tech’s best efforts to cancel the event, the march went on and gathered a huge crowd.
Twitter has been suppressing a large number of President Trump’s Tweets. Most of his Tweets have been flagged arbitrarily with a warning stating: “This claim about election fraud is disputed."
Please READ this recent article about Big Tech's attempt to choke information conerning the recent Million MAGA March in Washington, DC: '5 things mainstream media won’t tell you about massive DC ‘Stop the Steal’ rally'
Then, please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition, which calls on the Congress, the president, and governors to defend freedom of speech as Big Tech continues their rampant censorship.
PETITION UPDATE (10/15/2020)
In a remarkable development, Republican Senators Ted Cruz and Lindsey Graham have announced that the Senate Judiciary Committee will be issuing subpoenas to Twitter's Jack Dorsey and Facebook's Mark Zuckerburg for their company's suppression of two critical expose news stories about how Hunter Biden and the Biden Family allegedly profited from business deals made because of Joe Biden's position as Vice President.
Please WATCH LifeSite's exclusive video of the announcement by Senator Ted Cruz below.
According to the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Senator Lindsey Graham, the subpoenas will be issued next Tuesday, for hearings to be held on Friday of next week.
This is a MASSIVE development, and should be welcomed by those who champion freedom of speech.
Again, this is all happening because Twitter and Facebook refuse to allow their members to share stories which would be favorable to conservatives.
Here's the timeline:
Yesterday, Twitter and Facebook suppressed a NY Post story about how Hunter Biden allegedly profited from introducing a Ukrainian businessman to his then-Vice President father, Joe Biden. The story also alleges that Vice President Biden then subsequently pressured Ukrainian authorities to fire a prosecutor who was investigating the businessman's company.
And, just this morning, Twitter suppressed another expose by the NY Post alleging that the Biden Family improperly profitted from deals made with one of the largest Chinese energy companies because of Vice President Biden's position in government.
But, right after the story broke, Senator Cruz tried to share the latest story on Twitter and was blocked. Twitter says that they are blocking the stories because they claim that the information was obtained illegally. However, Twitter showed no problem allowing illegally obtained information about President Trump's tax returns to be shared.
Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition, which calls on the Congress, the president, and governors to defend freedom of speech as Big Tech continues their rampant censorship.
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
'GOP senators decry Big Tech censorship of NY Post story exposing Biden corruption' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/gop-senators-decry-big-tech-censorship-of-ny-post-story-exposing-biden-corruption
___________________________________________________________________________
PETITION UPDATE (9/17/2020)
Big Tech is out to kill free speech. LifeSite is out to protect it!
LifeSite has been digging deep into the many claims of liberal bias and selective censorship of pro-life, pro-family, and conservative voices on social media.
And, we are now launching our new series 'Uncensored: Big Tech vs. Free Speech', which will unpack how the actions of Big Tech censors actually affect conservative and Christian organization and individuals.
Please WATCH the first video in our series featuring Brigitte Gabriel, the Founder of ACT For America, one of the nation's premier national security grassroots organizations.
Ms. Gabriel's organization, ACT For America, has been targeted by Big Tech especially in the manipulation of search results.
Big Tech “think[s] they are God and they are exercising their godly power over everybody else,” Gabriel explained. "Because in today's world, anytime you want to find out any information about somebody, what do you do? Google. You go to the internet to find out some information about them. When you research anything about somebody, the first thing that comes up [in the search results] is the Southern Poverty Law Center’s labeling of ‘hate groups.’”
“And who are the ‘hate groups’? Family Research Council is a hate group because they are pro-family. American Family Radio is a hate group…LifeSiteNews is a hate group. My organization is a hate group because we sound the alarm about terrorism and protecting our constitutional freedom. And so they try to character assassinate you. And they control the language.”
LifeSite's research shows that Facebook, Google, YouTube, Twitter, and others have become far too dangerous for democracy.
They can and do sway elections and public opinion in whatever direction they want, primarily by manipulating search results, tracking our online behavior, and by blocking truthful content from their platforms.
Today, LifeSite is starting to fight back, with facts and with stories of conservatives and Christians who are being negatively impacted by Big Tech's liberal bias.
Please continue to follow our 'Big Tech vs. Free Speech' series which aims to launch a new video each week for the next eight weeks.
And, please sign our petition demanding that Big Tech monopolies are broken up. Thank you!
__________________________________________________________________________
ORIGINAL PETITION BACKGROUND TEXT:
The outrageous erasing of the White Coat Summit from the internet is only the latest in a long series of brazen acts of censorship against conservatives and all those who support legitimate free speech.
You may agree or disagree with the efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine against the coronavirus, but everyone should agree on this point:
No Big Tech company should have the power to erase from the internet the medical opinions of licensed practicing doctors simply because they do not like what they have to say about the coronavirus or their experience treating it. Americans and other free peoples do not need leftist computer programmers deciding what the best course of medical treatment is for them.
Google/Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, Apple and their Big Tech friends want to control what you see, what you read, what you think, and ultimately, how you vote. Not only do they spend hundreds of millions of dollars on lobbying congress and buttering up big Washington DC think tanks, but now they brazenly and directly censor any content they don't want you to see.
Big Tech, like other interest groups, aggressively lobby to help their businesses thrive, but increasingly, Big Tech is using blatant internet censorship to impose its radical world view over those they consider to be "deplorables."
This must stop, but it won't unless we demand it as forcefully as legally possible. We believe that we have reached the point were Big Tech must be broken up if legitimate free speech is going to survive and continue to thrive on the internet.
Please sign our petition to demand real consequences for Big Tech's suppression of legitimate free speech.
In 2016, emails revealed by Fox News' Tucker Carlson proved that Google tried to influence the election by affecting voter turnout. Thankfully they failed. But they didn't give up. Instead, they have been preparing and testing how to manipulate information to continue to abuse their monopolistic power.
In 2018, Google/Youtube et. al. succeeded in manipulating the Irish abortion referendum by blacklisting pro-life videos, manipulating pro-life search terms and results and intentionally withholding pro-life information. Again, this is not an opinion or a conspiracy theory, Project Veritas obtained first hand information proving the intentional censorship by Big Tech.
And the Coronavirus has just made things worse. You see, scared people are more easily manipulated into giving up their freedom of speech. Children are being kept from going to school, tens of millions of Americans are out of work, and rioting has broken out in most major American cities.
Now, more than ever, freedom of speech is necessary to secure all of our freedoms. Freedom of speech is crucial to truly exercise the freedom to vote for the person that best represents one's own views, or the freedom to decide what course of medical treatment to accept - especially the decision to control what vaccines are administered to our children.
Some experts, like Dr. Robert Epstein, a behavioral psychologist who has testified before congress against Big Tech believes that we may already be too late to control Big Tech's tyrannical control over information.
President Trump took a step in the right direction with his Executive Order calling for increased regulation of Big Tech. But much more can be done and needs to be done right now.
In an era where almost everything is polarized, there is an overwhelming support for breaking up the Big Tech monopolies. A recent Pew poll found that 75% of Americans believe that Big Tech companies have too much influence.
It is time to bring serious accountability to Big Tech for their attempts to use their monopolies to kill free speech.
It is time to break up Big Tech.
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Google, Facebook, Twitter shut down ‘frontline’ US doctors who promote ‘cure for COVID’ - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/google-facebook-twitter-shut-down-frontline-us-doctors-who-promote-cure-for-covid?utm_source=featured&utm_campaign=standard
Americans overwhelmingly agree Big Tech has too much power: Pew poll - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/americans-overwhelmingly-agree-big-tech-has-too-much-power-pew-poll
Leaked Google employee's email reveals effort to boost Latino vote, surprise that some voted for Trump - https://www.foxnews.com/tech/leaked-google-employees-email-reveals-effort-to-boost-latino-vote-surprise-that-some-voted-for-trump
Undercover video proves Google interfered in Irish abortion referendum - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/americans-overwhelmingly-agree-big-tech-has-too-much-power-pew-poll


lifesitenews--2020-12-04--UK bishops say ‘one does not sin by receiving’ abortion-tainted COVID vaccine

LONDON , U.K. , December 4 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) — Following the approval of the Pfizer coronavirus vaccine by the U.K. government , the Catholic Bishops Conference of England and Wales ( CBCEW ) stated that Catholics would not sin by taking a vaccine developed with aborted fetal cells .
The message , released only yesterday , comes as a follow-up to their September letter in which the CBCEW declared that a Catholic could use a vaccine derived from an aborted baby in “ good conscience.
” That letter , in turn , affirmed the bishops ’ previous @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bishops proclaimed that Catholics have a “ prima facie duty to be vaccinated.
” However , the bishops have gone beyond their earlier statements in the most recent one , seemingly claiming that even with abortion-tainted vaccines , “ one does not sin by receiving the vaccine.
” The letter mentions by name vaccines produced by Pfizer , Moderna and AstraZeneca , noting that the last “ has been developed from cell-lines originating from the cells of an aborted foetus in 1983.
” As in the previous statements , the CBCEW refers to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the 2017 Pontifical Academy for Life ( PAL ) document , which lessened moral objections to immoral vaccines , highlighting instead the individual ’ s “ moral obligation ” to be vaccinated for the sake of public health .
Based on these texts , the CBCEW states that “ one may in good conscience and for a grave reason receive a vaccine sourced in this way , ” that is , connected to abortion , providing “ there is a sufficient moral distance between the present administration of the vaccine and the original @ @ @ @ @ @ @ previous letters encouraging Catholics to get vaccinated , regardless of the vaccine ’ s connection to abortion , the December message is marked by one statement in particular : “ In the COVID-19 pandemic , we judge that this grave reason exists and that one does not sin by receiving the vaccine.
” The United Kingdom has a population of more than 66 million people .
Less than 70,000 deaths in the country have been attributed to COVID-19 throughout 2020 , which corresponds to 0.1 % of the population .
The bishops ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Moderna vaccines from the AstraZeneca one , as being different in moral character , and apparently without connection to abortion .
They note that Pfizer and Moderna “ have a different source since they are mRNA-based vaccines , ” referring also to the approval of the Pfizer vaccine in the U.K on the previous day .
Catholics must form their consciences on the subject of vaccines , adds the letter , “ also bearing in mind that a vaccine must be safe , effective , and universally available , especially to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is made of a vaccine having to be made without connection to aborted fetal cells .
“ Each of us has a duty to protect others from infection with its danger of serious illness , and for some , death , ” reads the letter .
“ A vaccine is the most effective way to achieve this unless one decides to self-isolate.
” According to the CBCEW , a Catholic may both take “ any of these vaccines for the good of others and themselves , ” and refuse “ a particular vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ good conscience.
” While the bishops state that one may take any vaccine “ in good conscience , ” they note that one might only refuse “ a particular vaccine , ” not all vaccines .
They argue that one “ continues to have a duty to protect others from infection , ” after earlier asserting that COVID-19 “ caused a global pandemic and led to a huge loss of life.
” In a statement made to LifeSite , John Smeaton , the Chief Executive of the Society for the Protection of Unborn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disappointing aspect of the statement from the Conference of Catholic Bishops of England and Wales on Covid-19 vaccines is the contrast between its emphasis on preventing the spread of the virus and its glossing over of the grave injustice being perpetrated by the pharmaceutical industry through the ongoing use of foetal tissue as a raw material in the manufacture of some vaccines .
It should be obvious to everyone that using human beings in this way is deeply immoral.
” “ For the Bishops to minimise the use of the remains of an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ originating from the cells of an aborted foetus in 1983 ’ is shocking .
This baby was wrongfully killed by abortion but the offence to human dignity perpetuated by the ongoing exploitation of a human being as a commercial resource should not only fill us with outrage but should convince us that the evil practice of harvesting body parts from aborted children must end .
This is not a single event of the distant past but the Bishops ’ statement fails to reflect the gravity of a crime which is occurring today , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enough people are prepared to refuse vaccines produced by immoral means will things change .
Only in the most extreme circumstances should receiving an illicit vaccine ever be considered and only then as a matter of last resort.
” Smeaton continued , “ It is a corporal act of mercy to bury the dead .
The Bishops should demand an immediate halt to the exploitation of unborn babies and insist the remains of all children currently being used by the pharmaceutical industry are put to rest with all the respect owed to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ imply that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are not connected to abortion , medical research and scientific data suggests otherwise .
Dr. Helen Watt of the Anscombe Bioethics Centre in Oxford , England , told the Catholic Herald that the Pfizer vaccine “ makes no use of a foetal cell line in the production process itself , and no use in the design , ” but that “ [ one ] of the confirmatory lab tests on the vaccine did sadly involve an old foetal cell line.
” The Children of God for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is tested using the HEK-293 cell line , which is derived from kidney tissue taken from a healthy baby who was aborted in the Netherlands in the 1970s .
The Moderna vaccine is also heavily connected to abortion .
Children of God for Life compiled research to show that Moderna “ extensively ” uses the “ aborted fetal cell line HEK-293 ” in the “ fundamental design of mRNA technology , their Spike protein and in the research , development , production and testing.
” The Spike protein and the mRNA used in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ technology that extensively used aborted fetal cells , rendering the vaccine absolutely immoral from start to finish.
” Bishop Brennan of Fresno , California , recently warned Catholics to avoid any vaccine connected to abortion in any way .
Mentioning the Pfizer vaccine by name , Brennan said “ we must always and only pursue vaccines that are ethical and morally acceptable .
Bishop Joseph Strickland of Tyler , Texas , has also warned people via Twitter against the Moderna vaccine , saying that it is not “ morally produced.
” Bishop Strickland @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccines using aborted babies .
He tweeted in April that “ if a vaccine for this virus is only attainable if we use body parts of aborted children then I will refuse the vaccine … I will not kill children to live.
” The bishop publicly re-issued this rejection of such vaccines : “ I renew my call that we reject any vaccine that is developed using aborted children .
Even if it originated decades ago it still means a child ’ s life was ended before it was born & then their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In a public letter issued in May , Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò , along with Cardinals Mueller , Punjat , and Zen , taught that “ for Catholics it is morally unacceptable to develop or use vaccines derived from material from aborted fetuses.
” They further stated that “ citizens must be given the opportunity to refuse these restrictions on personal freedom , without any penalty whatsoever being imposed on those who do not wish to use vaccines.
” Most recently , Bishop Athanasius Schneider , an auxiliary bishop of Astana , Kazakhstan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stated that mandatory vaccines are “ the last step of Satanism ” to “ legalize abortion globally — the killing of unborn babies — so that the entire planet will be collaborating in the process of killing babies through the vaccine which will use parts of aborted babies.
” Continuing , Schneider said that “ we must resist very strongly against this , if it comes .
We must even accept to be martyrs.
” Wholly unethical ’ : US ‘ personhood ’ org condemns COVID vaccines derived from aborted babies .
Cdl @ @ @ @ @ @ @ integrity of citizens ’ Kennedy Jr. warns parents about danger of using largely untested COVID vaccines on kids No , a COVID-19 vaccine is not necessary to return life to normal Abortion-tainted mandatory COVID vaccine would be the beginning ‘ of the Apocalypse ’ : Bp .
Schneider US bishop rebukes priest over homily warning against coronavirus vaccine

‘In the COVID-19 pandemic, we judge that this grave reason exists and that one does not sin by receiving the vaccine,’ the bishops argue.
LONDON, U.K., December 4, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — Following the approval of the Pfizer coronavirus vaccine by the U.K. government, the Catholic Bishops Conference of England and Wales (CBCEW) stated that Catholics would not sin by taking a vaccine developed with aborted fetal cells.
The message, released only yesterday, comes as a follow-up to their September letter in which the CBCEW declared that a Catholic could use a vaccine derived from an aborted baby in “good conscience.” That letter, in turn, affirmed the bishops’ previous statement from July, in which the bishops proclaimed that Catholics have a “prima facie duty to be vaccinated.”
However, the bishops have gone beyond their earlier statements in the most recent one, seemingly claiming that even with abortion-tainted vaccines, “one does not sin by receiving the vaccine.”
The letter mentions by name vaccines produced by Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca, noting that the last “has been developed from cell-lines originating from the cells of an aborted foetus in 1983.”
As in the previous statements, the CBCEW refers to the 2008 Vatican instruction Dignitatis Personae and the 2017 Pontifical Academy for Life (PAL) document, which lessened moral objections to immoral vaccines, highlighting instead the individual’s “moral obligation” to be vaccinated for the sake of public health.
Based on these texts, the CBCEW states that “one may in good conscience and for a grave reason receive a vaccine sourced in this way,” that is, connected to abortion, providing “there is a sufficient moral distance between the present administration of the vaccine and the original wrongful action.”
Despite the CBCEW issuing previous letters encouraging Catholics to get vaccinated, regardless of the vaccine’s connection to abortion, the December message is marked by one statement in particular: “In the COVID-19 pandemic, we judge that this grave reason exists and that one does not sin by receiving the vaccine.”
The United Kingdom has a population of more than 66 million people. Less than 70,000 deaths in the country have been attributed to COVID-19 throughout 2020, which corresponds to 0.1% of the population.
The bishops’ letter also seems to distinguish the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines from the AstraZeneca one, as being different in moral character, and apparently without connection to abortion. They note that Pfizer and Moderna “have a different source since they are mRNA-based vaccines,” referring also to the approval of the Pfizer vaccine in the U.K on the previous day.
Catholics must form their consciences on the subject of vaccines, adds the letter, “also bearing in mind that a vaccine must be safe, effective, and universally available, especially to the poor of the world.” No mention is made of a vaccine having to be made without connection to aborted fetal cells.
“Each of us has a duty to protect others from infection with its danger of serious illness, and for some, death,” reads the letter. “A vaccine is the most effective way to achieve this unless one decides to self-isolate.”
According to the CBCEW, a Catholic may both take “any of these vaccines for the good of others and themselves,” and refuse “a particular vaccine,” and do so “in good conscience.” While the bishops state that one may take any vaccine “in good conscience,” they note that one might only refuse “a particular vaccine,” not all vaccines.
They argue that one “continues to have a duty to protect others from infection,” after earlier asserting that COVID-19 “caused a global pandemic and led to a huge loss of life.”
— Article continues below Petition — SIGN: Join petition calling for a stop to COVID vaccine testing in Europe Show Petition Text 16601 have signed the petition. Let's get to 17500 ! Thank you for signing this petition! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Country... State... Sign this Petition Concerns over the health and safety of the human test subjects in Pfizer's European COVID vaccine study have caused two eminent doctors to launch a petition calling for an immediate halt to those studies. On December 1, 2020, Dr. Michael Yeadon, an ex chief of research at Pfizer and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a lung specialist and former department head of public health lodged an appeal to the EMA, the European Medicine Agency responsible for approving drugs across the EU, asking them to suspend the ongoing Pfizer/BioNtech COVID vaccine study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42). LifeSite is joining Drs. Yeadon and Wodarg in their call for an immediate suspension of this study and we are encouraging people to co-sign their petition to the EMA which is to be found in the petition section on this page. Please SIGN and SHARE this important petition, and then please contact the EMA at the address listed below, in the 'For More Information' section. In their application to the EMA, Drs. Yeadon and Wodarg give the following reasons why the Pfizer study could pose dangers to the health and safety of the study participants: First, the doctors say that the study design must be improved as the highly inaccurate PCR test is currently being used to detect the presence of COVID in the study participants. This means that the efficacy of the vaccine is in doubt. The doctors recommend changing from the PCR test to Sanger sequencing.
Second, and more important, the doctors advocate animal testing of the vaccine to exclude the possibility of the risks to the life and health of human participants from known side-effects of other similar studies on corona viruses. These side-effects can include: an exaggerated immune response when the subject comes into contact with the "real world" virus; possible infertility of an "indefinite duration" for women; severe allergic responses to polyethylene glycol which is contained in the mRNA vaccine being tested by Pfizer; and, other latent, serious side effects which, because of the short duration of the study, may only become known well after the conclusion of the study. Because of these unacceptable risks to the life and health of the Pfizer/BioNtech COVID vaccine study participants, we are joining with Drs. Yeadon and Wodarg as co-signers of their petition to the European Medicine Agency, asking for an immediate halt to these studies. Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING, today! And, after you have signed this petition, please send the sample email in the section below to the official European Medicine Agency email: [email protected] FOR MORE INFORMATION: Actual Petition Text (pdf): https://2020news.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Wodarg_Yeadon_EMA_Petition_Pfizer_Trial_FINAL_01DEC2020_EN_unsigned_with_Exhibits.pdf Sample Email: Subject: Please act on the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon and stay the Phase III clinical trial(s) of BNT162b Dear Sir or Madam, I am hereby co-signing the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon to support their urgent request to stay the Phase III clinical trial(s) of BNT162b (EudraCT Number 2020-002641-42) and other clinical trials. The full text of the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon can be found here: https://2020news.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Wodarg_Yeadon_EMA_Petition_Pfizer_Trial_FINAL_01DEC2020_EN_unsigned_with_Exhibits.pdf I hereby respectfully request that EMA act on the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon immediately. Regards, [Your name] **Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com Hide Petition Text Sign this Petition
In a statement made to LifeSite, John Smeaton, the Chief Executive of the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, said, “The most disappointing aspect of the statement from the Conference of Catholic Bishops of England and Wales on Covid-19 vaccines is the contrast between its emphasis on preventing the spread of the virus and its glossing over of the grave injustice being perpetrated by the pharmaceutical industry through the ongoing use of foetal tissue as a raw material in the manufacture of some vaccines. It should be obvious to everyone that using human beings in this way is deeply immoral.”
“For the Bishops to minimise the use of the remains of an unborn child by referring to ‘cell-lines originating from the cells of an aborted foetus in 1983’ is shocking. This baby was wrongfully killed by abortion but the offence to human dignity perpetuated by the ongoing exploitation of a human being as a commercial resource should not only fill us with outrage but should convince us that the evil practice of harvesting body parts from aborted children must end. This is not a single event of the distant past but the Bishops’ statement fails to reflect the gravity of a crime which is occurring today,” he continued.
“As His Eminence Cardinal Burke said recently: ‘With regard to vaccination, it must be clear that it is never morally justified to develop a vaccine through the use of the cell lines of aborted fetuses. The thought of the introduction of such a vaccine into one’s body is rightly abhorrent.’”
Smeaton continued, “It is a corporal act of mercy to bury the dead. The Bishops should demand an immediate halt to the exploitation of unborn babies and insist the remains of all children currently being used by the pharmaceutical industry are put to rest with all the respect owed to the dead.”
Details regarding the vaccines
While the CBCEW seems to imply that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are not connected to abortion, medical research and scientific data suggests otherwise. Dr. Helen Watt of the Anscombe Bioethics Centre in Oxford, England, told the Catholic Herald that the Pfizer vaccine “makes no use of a foetal cell line in the production process itself, and no use in the design,” but that “[one] of the confirmatory lab tests on the vaccine did sadly involve an old foetal cell line.”
The Children of God for Life organization adds that the Pfizer vaccine is tested using the HEK-293 cell line, which is derived from kidney tissue taken from a healthy baby who was aborted in the Netherlands in the 1970s.
The Moderna vaccine is also heavily connected to abortion. Children of God for Life compiled research to show that Moderna “extensively” uses the “aborted fetal cell line HEK-293” in the “fundamental design of mRNA technology, their Spike protein and in the research, development, production and testing.”
The Spike protein and the mRNA used in the Moderna vaccine “were built on technology that extensively used aborted fetal cells, rendering the vaccine absolutely immoral from start to finish.”
Teaching from Catholic bishops
Bishop Brennan of Fresno, California, recently warned Catholics to avoid any vaccine connected to abortion in any way. Mentioning the Pfizer vaccine by name, Brennan said “we must always and only pursue vaccines that are ethical and morally acceptable.
Bishop Joseph Strickland of Tyler, Texas, has also warned people via Twitter against the Moderna vaccine, saying that it is not “morally produced.”
Bishop Strickland has repeatedly called to halt production of vaccines using aborted babies. He tweeted in April that “if a vaccine for this virus is only attainable if we use body parts of aborted children then I will refuse the vaccine … I will not kill children to live.”
The bishop publicly re-issued this rejection of such vaccines: “I renew my call that we reject any vaccine that is developed using aborted children. Even if it originated decades ago it still means a child’s life was ended before it was born & then their body was used as spare parts.”
In a public letter issued in May, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, along with Cardinals Mueller, Punjat, and Zen, taught that “for Catholics it is morally unacceptable to develop or use vaccines derived from material from aborted fetuses.”
They further stated that “citizens must be given the opportunity to refuse these restrictions on personal freedom, without any penalty whatsoever being imposed on those who do not wish to use vaccines.”
Most recently, Bishop Athanasius Schneider, an auxiliary bishop of Astana, Kazakhstan, gave an interview in which he stated that mandatory vaccines are “the last step of Satanism” to “legalize abortion globally — the killing of unborn babies — so that the entire planet will be collaborating in the process of killing babies through the vaccine which will use parts of aborted babies.”
Continuing, Schneider said that “we must resist very strongly against this, if it comes. We must even accept to be martyrs.”
RELATED
Wholly unethical’: US ‘personhood’ org condemns COVID vaccines derived from aborted babies. Cdl. Burke: Forced vaccines violate ‘integrity of citizens’
Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine trials showed ‘severe’ side effects, ‘fever and aches’
Kennedy Jr. warns parents about danger of using largely untested COVID vaccines on kids
No, a COVID-19 vaccine is not necessary to return life to normal
Abortion-tainted mandatory COVID vaccine would be the beginning ‘of the Apocalypse’: Bp. Schneider
US bishop rebukes priest over homily warning against coronavirus vaccine
Share