lifesitenews--2020-12-09--How President Trump can still win the 2020 election

December 9 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) —The following is written by Hon .
Robert Marshall , former member of the Virginia House of Delegates .
Yes !
Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz explained that President Trump has a legal , though narrow , constitutional path to re-election .
Fareed Zakaria of CNN acknowledged this .
Senator Lindsay Graham ( R-SC ) noted , “ Everything should be on the table , ” in light of affidavits filed under penalty of years of jail time for perjury .
( Please take action shown at the end of this article !
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ for choosing presidential Electors on state legislatures : “ Each State shall appoint , in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct , a Number of Electors , equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress ... .
” ( emphasis added ) [ Article II , Section 1 , clause 2 ] State legislatures do not need permission of Governors to call a special session to select presidential Electors .
What does the Supreme Court say ?
A nearly 130-year-old @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ This power [ to choose Electors ] is conferred upon the legislatures of the states by the Constitution of the United States , and can not be taken from them or modified by their state constitutions … Whatever provisions may be made by statute , or by the state constitution , to choose electors by the people , there is no doubt of the right of the legislature to resume the power at any time , for it can neither be taken away nor abdicated .
[ McPherson v. Blacker , 146 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) ] Bush v. Gore ( 2000 ) reaffirmed the 1892 McPhersondecision .
Chief Justice Rhenquist noted that , “ The grounds for contesting an election include ‘ [ r ] eceipt of a number of illegal votes or rejection of a number of legal votes sufﬁcient to change or place in doubt the result of the election .
’ ” ( emphasis added ) [ Bush v. Gore , 531 U.S. 98 , 117 , opinion , ( 2000 ) ] Is there evidence for Fraud in the 2020 presidential election ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of perjury carrying years of jail time , have been brought before state legislatures or courts in “ swing states.
” State election law was violated in six “ swing states ” ( Arizona , Wisconsin , Michigan , Georgia , Nevada , and Pennsylvania ) according to sworn statements : • Republicans were denied access to oversee ballot counting leaving only Democrat partisans in charge , violating state law and practice ; • State laws which set deadlines for acceptance of mailed in ballots were changed illegally by courts and/or administrative agencies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ matching signatures on ballots to voter registration files violating state law .
Additionally , affidavits were sworn that Dominion Voting Systems used computers and software connected to the internet and open to security breaches and foreign intrusion .
The public can not have confidence in the 2020 presidential election unless competent authority examines and ensures that only legal ballots were counted .
State legislatures hold constitutional authority to send Congress a slate of presidential electors if the vote count or election procedures violated state law .
The Thomas More Society , a national @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : The Thomas More Society also explains that there are hundreds of thousands of potentially fraudulent or illegal ballots making up Joe Biden ’ s ostensible lead over Donald Trump .
Legislatures taking action to ensure that only legal ballots were counted are NOT “ overthrowing an election , ” but guaranteeing an honest one .
Is it too late for states legislatures to act ?
NO !
But time is short .
Presidential Electors are scheduled to vote in state capitols on December 14 .
The Library of Congress reports that Electors @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 28 .
In the 1960 Kennedy-Nixon race the governor of Hawaii first approved Nixon Electors , then later approved Kennedy electors after a recount .
[ Counting Electoral Votes , etc .
RL 32717 , p .
9 , 2016 , ] Electoral ballots are due by Dec. 23 , 2020 , but the National Conference of State Legislaturesnotes , “ There is no penalty for missing this deadline.
” The US House and Senate meet in joint session on Jan. 6 , 2021 in Washington to count the electoral ballots .
January @ @ @ @ @ @ @ If state legislatures and a Secretary of State send different Electors to Congress , then what ?
The Library of Congress Congressional Research Division reports that if more than one set of presidential electors is sent to Congress by different state authorities , the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate vote separately to choose which set of Electors to accept , or , reject all sets of Electors .
But the House and Senate must both agree to accept or reject Electors .
[ Counting Electoral Votes etc.
, p .
8 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no presidential candidates receives 270 Electoral votes ?
After the House and Senate agree or disagree on accepting slates of Elector , if neither Vice President Joe Biden nor President Donald Trump receive the minimum 270 Electoral votes needed to win , the selection of the President will be made by the U.S. House of Representatives under the Twelfth Amendment which stipulates that each state has only one vote regardless of the population of the state , e.g .
both California and New Hampshire would have one vote each .
There are at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ House of Representatives that have a majority of Republicans in their delegations .
If all of the Republican majority Delegations choose Electors for Donald Trump , he would be reelected .
Citizens must urge Republican state legislators in Arizona , Georgia , Michigan , Pennsylvania and Wisconsin ( see email addresses below ) to ascertain whether or not the election was conducted fairly and in full compliance with state law and practice , and investigate allegations of fraud to provide for the integrity of the 2020 Election and all future elections .
If @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wisconsin , Georgia , Michigan , or Arizona you still have a First Amendment right to `` ... petition the government for redress of grievances '' as decisions made in these states directly impact your vote .
For each state , please copy and paste the block of emails in the BCC ( blind copy ) , and petition these Republican legislators with the “ Sample Message ” which follows , or a message of your own .
Urge others to do the same .
Please examine whether only legal votes were counted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ certain areas Republicans were not allowed to monitor vote counts as required by state law .
Further , the U.S. Supreme Court in Bush v. Gore ( 2000 ) ruled that only state legislatures , not executive agencies or courts , may change election law .
Why have Dominion Voting Systems representatives refused invitations to testify at public hearings ?
If any affidavits cause you to doubt the fairness of the election , you have the duty and authority under Article 2 , Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution to select a list @ @ @ @ @ @ @ legal ballot count .
Please confirm that you intend to uphold and defend the Constitution and election integrity at this critical time in American history .
Thank you .
Below are links to state legislative hearings and court filings about 2020 Election fraud : • Investigative Reporter Sharyl Attkisson ’ s collection of original sources for Hard to Find Documents and Information on 2020 Presidential Race and Fraud • affidavits and court filings , and links to active Trump court cases : ( as of 12/7/20 ) Governor Kemp is waffling- call him @ @ @ @ @ @

And what you can do to help make it happen
December 9, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) —The following is written by Hon. Robert Marshall, former member of the Virginia House of Delegates.
Can President Trump still win re-election?
Yes! Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz explained that President Trump has a legal, though narrow, constitutional path to re-election. Fareed Zakaria of CNN acknowledged this. Senator Lindsay Graham (R-SC) noted, “Everything should be on the table,” in light of affidavits filed under penalty of years of jail time for perjury. (Please take action shown at the end of this article!)
Can state legislatures choose presidential Electors?
The federal Constitution places the obligation for choosing presidential Electors on state legislatures: “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress ….” (emphasis added) [Article II, Section 1, clause 2]
State legislatures do not need permission of Governors to call a special session to select presidential Electors.
What does the Supreme Court say?
A nearly 130-year-old Supreme Court decision, held that, “This power [to choose Electors] is conferred upon the legislatures of the states by the Constitution of the United States, and cannot be taken from them or modified by their state constitutions … Whatever provisions may be made by statute, or by the state constitution, to choose electors by the people, there is no doubt of the right of the legislature to resume the power at any time, for it can neither be taken away nor abdicated. [McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U. S. 1, 35 (1892)]
Bush v. Gore(2000) reaffirmed the 1892 McPhersondecision. Chief Justice Rhenquist noted that, “The grounds for contesting an election include ‘[r]eceipt of a number of illegal votes or rejection of a number of legal votes sufﬁcient to change or place in doubt the result of the election .’” (emphasis added) [Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98, 117, opinion, (2000)]
Is there evidence for Fraud in the 2020 presidential election?
Yes! Numerous affidavits sworn under penalty of perjury carrying years of jail time, have been brought before state legislatures or courts in “swing states.” State election law was violated in six “swing states” (Arizona, Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia, Nevada, and Pennsylvania) according to sworn statements:
Republicans were denied access to oversee ballot counting leaving only Democrat partisans in charge, violating state law and practice;
State laws which set deadlines for acceptance of mailed in ballots were changed illegally by courts and/or administrative agencies.
Absentee ballots were accepted without matching signatures on ballots to voter registration files violating state law.
Additionally, affidavits were sworn that Dominion Voting Systems used computers and software connected to the internet and open to security breaches and foreign intrusion.
The public cannot have confidence in the 2020 presidential election unless competent authority examines and ensures that only legal ballots were counted. State legislatures hold constitutional authority to send Congress a slate of presidential electors if the vote count or election procedures violated state law.
The Thomas More Society, a national public interest law firm, notes that:
“Because the laws governing the vote were violated in numerous ways in several key states, certification of the election results cannot be said to have been made in accordance with the laws established in those states. Therefore, the responsibility still rests with state legislatures to appoint their state’s Electors, because no ‘determination made pursuant to such law’ has actually been made. …” [Thomas More Society, Set in Stone?]
The Thomas More Society also explains that there are hundreds of thousands of potentially fraudulent or illegal ballots making up Joe Biden’s ostensible lead over Donald Trump.
Virginia attorneys, Pat McSweeney and Bill Olson, note:
“If, however, the legislature (and by extension, the people) harbors serious doubts about whether the election results reflect the true will of lawful voters, that body is free to determine how to proceed. The legislature’s plenary constitutional authority under the Electors Clause is reflected in 3 U.S.C. §2: When a state ‘has failed to make a choice on the day prescribed bylaw, the electors may be appointed on a subsequent day in such a manner as the legislature of such State may direct.’” (See Western Journal)
Legislatures taking action to ensure that only legal ballots were counted are NOT “overthrowing an election,” but guaranteeing an honest one.
— Article continues below Petition — Stand with Texas in Supreme Court voter fraud challenge Show Petition Text 1464 have signed the petition. Let's get to 2500 ! Thank you for signing this petition! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Country... State... Sign this Petition PETITION UPDATE (12/12/2020) - In a 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court of the United States declined to hear the case filed by the state of Texas. PETITION UPDATE (12/11/2020) - 6 states have formally joined Texas in its Supreme Court suit against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin—four battleground states who ran illegal and unconstitutional elections. Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Utah have formally joined Texas and agree that the defendant states exploited the COVID-19 pandemic to justify unlawfully enacting last-minute changes and ignoring both federal and state election laws, thus skewing the results of the 2020 General Election. While Missouri and 16 other states filed an amicus brief with the Court supporting Texas, 20 other states plus the District of Columbia signed an amicus brief supporting the 4 defendant states. Please SIGN this petition and STAND with Texas, as the state seeks justice in the 2020 general election for all citizens of the United States. '6 states formally join Texas in lawsuit defending the security of the 2020 election' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/6-states-formally-join-texas-in-lawsuit-defending-the-security-of-the-2020-election ____________________________________________________________________ The state of Texas has filed suit against Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Georgia in the Supreme Court over changes which those states made to their election rules, claiming they violated the U.S. Constitution in the process. Here is the central part of the argument: if Texas were to allow possible voter fraud to go unchecked in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Georgia, it would be akin to committing fraud upon the people of Texas, who cast their ballots within the framework of the law. Indeed, this would apply equally to all citizens who voted within the framework of the law across the United States! Thankfully, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is stepping up to vindicate the right of all Texans - and, all Americans - to have every legal vote be counted. But, the Supreme Court has only until Thursday morning to either accept or decline hearing the case. Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition, now. The main claim that Texas makes is that Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Georgia violated the Electoral Clause of the U.S. Constitution by changing their election rules on mail-in ballots by executive or judicial action, rather than by action from the legislature. But, America is a land of laws, and most people play by the rules. Citizens also want our state executives and judiciaries to play by the rules. Bypassing state legislatures, even during a pandemic, cannot be justifiable as it goes against our system of checks and balances, and, ultimately, as it is the legislatures who have the power, vested by the people, to make determinations about state electoral regulations. Texas also alleges that the defendant-states further violated the U.S. Constitution's Equal Protection Clause by applying different election rules for different parts of their respective states, meaning that election rules were not the same for every citizen of each state. Texas approached the Supreme Court directly because in disputes between states, the Supreme Court is the court of "first impression." But, the Court only has a limited window to accept or decline hearing the case. Please SIGN and SHARE this important petition today. FOR MORE INFORMATION: '‘This is the big one’, says Trump of Texas SCOTUS election challenge' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/this-is-the-big-one-says-trump-of-texas-scotus-election-challenge 'Texas asks Supreme Court to toss 4 states’ election results over illegal mail ballots' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/texas-asks-supreme-court-to-toss-4-states-election-results-over-illegal-mail-ballots Hide Petition Text Sign this Petition
Is it too late for states legislatures to act?
NO! But time is short. Presidential Electors are scheduled to vote in state capitols on December 14. The Library of Congress reports that Electors have been selected as late as December 28. In the 1960 Kennedy-Nixon race the governor of Hawaii first approved Nixon Electors, then later approved Kennedy electors after a recount. [Counting Electoral Votes, etc. RL 32717,p. 9, 2016,]
Electoral ballots are due by Dec. 23, 2020, but the National Conference of State Legislaturesnotes, “There is no penalty for missing this deadline.” The US House and Senate meet in joint session on Jan. 6, 2021 in Washington to count the electoral ballots. January 20, 2021 is Inauguration Day.
If state legislatures and a Secretary of State send different Electors to Congress, then what?
The Library of Congress Congressional Research Division reports that if more than one set of presidential electors is sent to Congress by different state authorities, the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate vote separately to choose which set of Electors to accept, or, reject all sets of Electors. But the House and Senate must both agree to accept or reject Electors. [Counting Electoral Votes etc.,p. 8, RL32717, 2016]
What happens if no presidential candidates receives 270 Electoral votes?
After the House and Senate agree or disagree on accepting slates of Elector, if neither Vice President Joe Biden nor President Donald Trump receive the minimum 270 Electoral votes needed to win, the selection of the President will be made by the U.S. House of Representatives under the Twelfth Amendment which stipulates that each state has only one vote regardless of the population of the state, e.g. both California and New Hampshire would have one vote each.
There are at least 26 states represented in the U.S. House of Representatives that have a majority of Republicans in their delegations. If all of the Republican majority Delegations choose Electors for Donald Trump, he would be reelected.
Grass Roots Action Needed Immediately!
Citizens must urge Republican state legislators in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin (see email addresses below) to ascertain whether or not the election was conducted fairly and in full compliance with state law and practice, and investigate allegations of fraud to provide for the integrity of the 2020 Election and all future elections.
If you do not live in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, Michigan, or Arizona you still have a First Amendment right to “…petition the government for redress of grievances” as decisions made in these states directly impact your vote.
For each state, please copy and paste the block of emails in the BCC (blind copy), and petition these Republican legislators with the “Sample Message” which follows, or a message of your own. Urge others to do the same.
Suggested letter
Dear Representative (or Senator):
Please examine whether only legal votes were counted in the 2020 presidential election.
In certain areas Republicans were not allowed to monitor vote counts as required by state law. Further, the U.S. Supreme Court in Bush v. Gore(2000) ruled that only state legislatures, not executive agencies or courts, may change election law.
Why have Dominion Voting Systems representatives refused invitations to testify at public hearings?
If any affidavits cause you to doubt the fairness of the election, you have the duty and authority under Article 2, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution to select a list of Presidential Electors which reflects only the legal ballot count.
Please confirm that you intend to uphold and defend the Constitution and election integrity at this critical time in American history. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Below are links to state legislative hearings and court filings about 2020 Election fraud:
Pennsylvania legislators email addresses
50 (approximately)
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
70
[email protected]; [email protected]om;
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected];
55
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]ahousegop.com; [email protected];
[email protected]
Wisconsin legislators
90
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]
Georgia legislators
Governor Kemp is waffling- call him at 800-436-7442 to leave a message
90
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]a.gov;
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected];
40
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]
Michigan legislators
75
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]
Arizona legislators
55
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]
Share


lifesitenews--2020-12-09--Rand Paul criticizes Biden’s pro-abortion HHS pick Becerra as ‘way outside the mainstream’

Big Tech is censoring us .
Subscribe to our email list and bookmark LifeSiteNews.com to continue getting our news .
Subscribe now .
December 9 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) – Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky called out the hard-line , pro-abortion stance of former Vice President Joe Biden ’ s pick to run the Department of Health and Human Services in his administration , saying he would “ hate to have ” Xavier Becerra in charge of dispensing government money for late-term abortion .
On Monday , Biden announced his selection of Becerra , the Democrat Attorney General @ @ @ @ @ @ @ HHS Secretary .
“ I ’ m concerned about the reports that say that he ’ s been a champion for late-term abortion and at the time of birth abortion , and that ’ s outside the norm , ” Paul told Fox News on Monday , Breitbart reported .
“ Even pro-choice people a lot of times will say they believe in some restrictions , but to believe in sort of complete , unlimited abortion until the time of birth or after , I think is something that ’ s a very @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to have him in charge of trying to dispense government monies towards that kind of policy.
” “ So we ’ ll look long and hard and I ’ ll try to keep an open mind , but my first impression of what I ’ m hearing about him is that he may be way outside the mainstream of what anybody in Kentucky would think is right , ” Paul said .
As attorney general of the Golden State , Becerra was responsible for enforcing draconian restrictions on religious assembly in the name @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other Democrat officials across the country in using the pandemic as a justification to demand abortion pills be approved for unsupervised home use .
Becerra has also shown a marked hostility to Americans who follow Judeo-Christian teaching on matters such as abortion and homosexuality , from forcing churches to subsidize elective abortions in health insurance , to forcing pro-life pregnancy centers to advertise abortion resources , to refusing to fund state employees ’ travel to South Carolina in protest of its law protecting adoption agencies that insist on giving children both a mother @ @ @ @ @ @ @ closely with those of Biden , who has been falsely described as a “ moderate ” Democrat despite supporting effectively-unlimited abortion at taxpayer expense and comprehensive recognition and accommodation of homosexuality and gender fluidity at the expense of religious or conscience rights , despite his stated faith affiliation .
The outcome of next month ’ s Senate runoff elections in Georgia will decide whether Republicans or Democrats control the Senate , which will in turn determine how easily Biden will be able to confirm Becerra .
LifeSiteNews is facing increasing censorship .
Click @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when we add to our video library .

' ... to believe in sort of complete, unlimited abortion until the time of birth or after, I think is something that’s a very radical position, and I would hate to have him in charge of trying to dispense government monies towards that kind of policy,' the U.S. senator from Kentucky said.
Big Tech is censoring us. Subscribe to our email list and bookmark LifeSiteNews.com to continue getting our news. Subscribe now.
December 9, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky called out the hard-line, pro-abortion stance of former Vice President Joe Biden’s pick to run the Department of Health and Human Services in his administration, saying he would “hate to have” Xavier Becerra in charge of dispensing government money for late-term abortion.
On Monday, Biden announced his selection of Becerra, the Democrat Attorney General of California, to serve as his HHS Secretary.
“I’m concerned about the reports that say that he’s been a champion for late-term abortion and at the time of birth abortion, and that’s outside the norm,” Paul told Fox News on Monday, Breitbart reported. “Even pro-choice people a lot of times will say they believe in some restrictions, but to believe in sort of complete, unlimited abortion until the time of birth or after, I think is something that’s a very radical position, and I would hate to have him in charge of trying to dispense government monies towards that kind of policy.”
“So we’ll look long and hard and I’ll try to keep an open mind, but my first impression of what I’m hearing about him is that he may be way outside the mainstream of what anybody in Kentucky would think is right,” Paul said.
As attorney general of the Golden State, Becerra was responsible for enforcing draconian restrictions on religious assembly in the name of containing COVID-19, and has joined other Democrat officials across the country in using the pandemic as a justification to demand abortion pills be approved for unsupervised home use.
Becerra has also shown a marked hostility to Americans who follow Judeo-Christian teaching on matters such as abortion and homosexuality, from forcing churches to subsidize elective abortions in health insurance, to forcing pro-life pregnancy centers to advertise abortion resources, to refusing to fund state employees’ travel to South Carolina in protest of its law protecting adoption agencies that insist on giving children both a mother and a father.
Such views align closely with those of Biden, who has been falsely described as a “moderate” Democrat despite supporting effectively-unlimited abortion at taxpayer expense and comprehensive recognition and accommodation of homosexuality and gender fluidity at the expense of religious or conscience rights, despite his stated faith affiliation.
The outcome of next month’s Senate runoff elections in Georgia will decide whether Republicans or Democrats control the Senate, which will in turn determine how easily Biden will be able to confirm Becerra.
LifeSiteNews is facing increasing censorship. Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video library.
Share


lifesitenews--2020-12-09--Doctor on CNN: Don’t be ‘alarmed’ if elderly die after receiving COVID vaccine

December 9 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) – A doctor told CNN that nobody should be “ surprised ” to see reports of “ multiple people dying ” at long-term care facilities a day or two after having received the COVID vaccination .
Dr. Kelly Moore , associate director of the Immunization Action Coalition , told CNN last week that the COVID-19 vaccines have not been tested on the “ frail elderly.
” '' Since they have n't been studied in people in those populations , we do n't know how well the vaccine will work for them .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nearly as well in a frail elderly person as they would in someone who is fit and vigorous , even if they happen to be the same age , '' said Moore .
Moore said that Americans need to be prepared for reports about the elderly dying “ a day or two ” after receiving the vaccine jab , adding that such deaths are a “ normal occurrence ” that may have nothing to do with the vaccine since such people “ die frequently.
” '' We would not at all be surprised @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and then having someone pass away a short time after they receive a vaccine , not because it has anything to do with the vaccination but just because that 's the place where people at the end of their lives reside , '' Moore said .
`` One of the things we want to make sure people understand is that they should not be unnecessarily alarmed if there are reports , once we start vaccinating , of someone or multiple people dying within a day or two of their vaccination who are residents @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would be something we would expect , as a normal occurrence , because people die frequently in nursing homes , ” Moore added .
Last week , a panel of doctors advising the U.S. Centers for Disease Prevention and Control ( CDC ) voted to recommend that elderly staff of long-term care facilities be among the first in line to receive the COVID-19 vaccine .
Out of the panel of 14 advisers , however , one doctor voted against the recommendation .
Vanderbilt University researcher Helen Keipp Talbot , who studies vaccines in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the Dec. 1 vote that data is lacking to support the use of a COVID vaccine for the elderly in long-term care residents .
“ I have spent my career studying vaccines in older adults .
We have traditionally tried a vaccine in a young , healthy population and then hoped it worked in our frail , older adults .
And so we enter this realm of ‘ We hope it works and we hope it ’ s safe.
’ And that concerns me on many levels , ” Moore said .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ that there appears to be a double standard when it comes to attributing causes of death to the elderly during COVID times .
“ While deaths in care homes of people who take the vaccine are described as normal and nothing to do with the vaccine , some would suggest that you could make the exact same argument about deaths of those with multiple comorbidities in care homes that were put down to COVID .
Many have and have been shouted down for doing so , ” he said .
Last week , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for deaths that will happen after people are injected with a COVID-19 vaccine , but not necessarily caused by it .
Lothar H. Wieler , president of the Robert Koch Institute in Berlin , the national public health institute in Germany , said Dec. 3 that with an average of 2,500 people dying each day in Germany , it is probable that some will die after having taken the vaccine .
“ That means there is the possibility — and it is statistically very probable — that people , in connection with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will be extremely important to determine whether the cause of death was the vaccine or another pre-existing disease , ” he said .
“ This is precisely why we need vaccination centers with centralized data collection for tracking side effects , ” he added .
Children ’ s Health Defense is urging the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to “ take a cautious approach in approving COVID-19 vaccines that have been developed at ‘ warp speed , ’ ” noting that the potential long-term pathologic effects of taking such vaccines remain unknown .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , autoimmune diseases , neurodevelopmental problems , and cancers are unlikely to be detectable within the short clinical trial follow-up windows , ” Robert Kennedy Jr. , chairman of Children ’ s Health Defense , stated in a Dec. 4 open letter to Peter Marks , director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research .
LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page .
View it here .
LifeSiteNews is facing increasing censorship .
Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video library .

Dr. Kelly Moore said that people 'should not be unnecessarily alarmed if there are reports, once we start vaccinating, of someone or multiple people dying within a day or two of their vaccination who are residents of a long-term care facility.'
December 9, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – A doctor told CNN that nobody should be “surprised” to see reports of “multiple people dying” at long-term care facilities a day or two after having received the COVID vaccination.
Dr. Kelly Moore, associate director of the Immunization Action Coalition, told CNN last week that the COVID-19 vaccines have not been tested on the “frail elderly.”
“Since they haven't been studied in people in those populations, we don't know how well the vaccine will work for them. We know that most vaccines don't work nearly as well in a frail elderly person as they would in someone who is fit and vigorous, even if they happen to be the same age,” said Moore.
Moore said that Americans need to be prepared for reports about the elderly dying “a day or two” after receiving the vaccine jab, adding that such deaths are a “normal occurrence” that may have nothing to do with the vaccine since such people “die frequently.”
“We would not at all be surprised to see, coincidentally, vaccination happening and then having someone pass away a short time after they receive a vaccine, not because it has anything to do with the vaccination but just because that's the place where people at the end of their lives reside,” Moore said.
“One of the things we want to make sure people understand is that they should not be unnecessarily alarmed if there are reports, once we start vaccinating, of someone or multiple people dying within a day or two of their vaccination who are residents of a long-term care facility. That would be something we would expect, as a normal occurrence, because people die frequently in nursing homes,” Moore added.
Last week, a panel of doctors advising the U.S. Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) voted to recommend that elderly staff of long-term care facilities be among the first in line to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Out of the panel of 14 advisers, however, one doctor voted against the recommendation.
— Article continues below Petition — PETITION: No to mandatory vaccination for the coronavirus Show Petition Text 1082416 have signed the petition. Let's get to 1100000 ! Thank you for signing this petition! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Country... State... Sign this Petition People of goodwill can disagree about the safety, efficacy and religious implications of a new vaccine for the coronavirus. But, everyone should agree on this point: No government can force anyone who has reached legal adulthood to be vaccinated for the coronavirus. Equally, no government can vaccinate minors for the coronavirus against the will of their parents or guardians. Please SIGN this urgent petition which urges policymakers at every level of government to reject calls for mandatory coronavirus vaccination. Fear of a disease - which we know very little about, relative to other similar diseases - must not lead to knee-jerk reactions regarding public health, nor can it justify supporting the hidden agenda of governmental as well as non-governmental bodies that have apparent conflicts of interest in plans to restrict personal freedoms. The so-called "public health experts" have gotten it wrong many times during the current crisis. We should not, therefore, allow their opinions to rush decision-makers into policies regarding vaccination. And, while some people, like Bill Gates, may have a lot of money, his opinion and that of his NGO (the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) - namely, that life will not return to normal till people are widely vaccinated - should not be permitted to influence policy decisions on a coronavirus vaccination program. Finally, we must also not allow the rush by pharmaceutical companies to produce a new coronavirus vaccine to, itself, become an imperative for vaccination. Unwitting citizens must not be used as guinea pigs for New World Order ideologues, or Big Pharma, in pursuit of a vaccine (and, profits) which may not even protect against future mutated strains of the coronavirus. And it goes without saying that the production of vaccines using aborted babies for cell replication is a total non-starter, as the technique is gravely immoral. However, if after sufficient study of the issue, a person who has reached the age of majority wishes to be vaccinated with a morally produced vaccine, along with his children, that is his business. But we cannot and will not permit the government to make that decision for us. Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this petition, urging policymakers at all levels of government to reject mandatory coronavirus vaccination. FOR MORE INFORMATION: Bill Gates: Life won’t go back to ‘normal’ until population 'widely vaccinated' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bill-gates-life-wont-go-back-to-normal-until-population-widely-vaccinated COVID-19 scare leads to more digital surveillance, talk of mandatory vaccine 'tattoos' for kids' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/covid-19-scare-leads-to-more-digital-surveillance-talk-of-mandatory-vaccine-tattoos-for-kids Trudeau says no return to ‘normal’ without vaccine: 'Could take 12 to 18 months' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trudeau-says-no-return-to-normal-without-vaccine-could-take-12-to-18-months Trudeau mulls making coronavirus vaccine mandatory for Canadians - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trudeau-mulls-making-coronavirus-vaccine-mandatory-for-canadians US bishop vows to ‘refuse’ COVID-19 vaccine if made from ‘aborted fetal tissue' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-bishop-vows-to-refuse-covid-19-vaccine-if-made-from-aborted-fetal-tissue ** While LifeSite opposes immorally-produced vaccines using aborted fetal cell lines, we do not have a position on any particular coronavirus vaccines produced without such moral problems. We realize many have general concerns about vaccines, but also recognize that millions of lives have been saved due to vaccines. *** Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com Hide Petition Text Sign this Petition
Vanderbilt University researcher Helen Keipp Talbot, who studies vaccines in older adults, told the committee ahead of the Dec. 1 vote that data is lacking to support the use of a COVID vaccine for the elderly in long-term care residents.
“I have spent my career studying vaccines in older adults. We have traditionally tried a vaccine in a young, healthy population and then hoped it worked in our frail, older adults. And so we enter this realm of ‘We hope it works and we hope it’s safe.’ And that concerns me on many levels,” Moore said.
Paul Joseph Watson commented at Summit News that there appears to be a double standard when it comes to attributing causes of death to the elderly during COVID times.
“While deaths in care homes of people who take the vaccine are described as normal and nothing to do with the vaccine, some would suggest that you could make the exact same argument about deaths of those with multiple comorbidities in care homes that were put down to COVID. Many have and have been shouted down for doing so,” he said.
Last week, the German federal government began preparing citizens for deaths that will happen after people are injected with a COVID-19 vaccine, but not necessarily caused by it.
Lothar H. Wieler, president of the Robert Koch Institute in Berlin, the national public health institute in Germany, said Dec. 3 that with an average of 2,500 people dying each day in Germany, it is probable that some will die after having taken the vaccine.
“That means there is the possibility — and it is statistically very probable — that people, in connection with the vaccination, will die. Then it will be extremely important to determine whether the cause of death was the vaccine or another pre-existing disease,” he said.
“This is precisely why we need vaccination centers with centralized data collection for tracking side effects,” he added.
Children’s Health Defense is urging the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to “take a cautious approach in approving COVID-19 vaccines that have been developed at ‘warp speed,’” noting that the potential long-term pathologic effects of taking such vaccines remain unknown.
“Unfortunately, conditions such as allergies, autoimmune diseases, neurodevelopmental problems, and cancers are unlikely to be detectable within the short clinical trial follow-up windows,” Robert Kennedy Jr., chairman of Children’s Health Defense, stated in a Dec. 4 open letter to Peter Marks, director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here.
LifeSiteNews is facing increasing censorship. Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video library.
Share


lifesitenews--2020-12-09--Alabama, Louisiana back Texas lawsuit to toss illegal mail ballots in 4 states

December 9 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) — The attorneys general of Alabama and Louisiana have endorsed Texas ’ s lawsuit asking the United States Supreme Court to void the November election results in Georgia , Michigan , Pennsylvania , and Wisconsin over the alleged illegality of their executive expansion of mail voting , increasing the odds of the nation ’ s highest court taking the case .
The suit , filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton , seeks a temporary restraining order to keep the four states from certifying presidential electors based on results “ tainted ” by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a voter to give specific reason , a requirement waived this year in the name of avoiding COVID-19 .
Paxton argues that governors and secretaries of state instituted these changes unilaterally , “ without any consent by the state legislatures ” as required by state law , and in doing so “ have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens ’ vote , but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.
” In response , Alabama Attorney @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Jeff Landry have both issued statements expressing support for the Texas suit .
“ The unconstitutional actions and fraudulent votes in other states not only affect the citizens of those states , they affect the citizens of all states , ” Marshall said .
“ Every unlawful vote counted , or lawful vote uncounted , debases and dilutes citizens ’ free exercise of the franchise.
” “ Millions of Louisiana citizens , and tens of millions of our fellow citizens in the country , have deep concerns regarding the conduct of the 2020 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Deeply rooted in these concerns is the fact that some states appear to have conducted their elections with a disregard to the U.S. Constitution … Only the U.S. Supreme Court can ultimately decide cases of real controversy among the states under our Constitution.
” The Supreme Court just rejected a separate election lawsuit covering similar ground in Alabama .
It remains to be seen if it will take the Texas one , though in the meantime the Court has given the four defendant states until Thursday afternoon to respond to Texas ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ won the election according to the official vote totals , but President Donald Trump has refused to concede , citing widespread reports of vote fraud in several states , which call the accuracy of those totals into question .
LifeSiteNews is facing increasing censorship .
Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video library .

PETITION UPDATE (1/15/2021) -
The events of the past month, and especially the past 10 days, have shaken the faith Americans have in their elected and appoint officials.
We continue to call for investigations to be made into allegations of election fraud. Texas is in the process of prosecuting one political operative for illegal ballot harvesting, and multiple state legislatures have called for investigations, too.
However, the judiciary has severely let down the American electorate.
As we have said all along, the integrity of the election is much bigger than President Trump. Election integrity is at the heart of republican democracy, and if we don't have it, we no longer have a functioning republic.
Therefore, we continue to seek the truth for the election outcome. Perhaps that will only be known in the future when state or federal commissions are established to investigate the instances of election fraud which were witnessed and sworn to, by thousands of Americans of all political persuasions.
In the meantime, you may still sign this petition. Thank you!
___________________________________________________________________
PETITION UPDATE (12/10/20) -
On Wednesday, President Trump tweeted: "We will be INTERVENING in the Texas (plus many other states) case. This is the big one. Our Country needs a victory!"
He is referring to the lawsuit which the state of Texas has filed against Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Georgia in the Supreme Court over changes those states made to their election rules, claiming they violated the U.S. Constitution in the process.
Here is the central part of the argument: if Texas were to allow possible voter fraud to go unchecked in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Georgia, it would be akin to committing fraud upon the people of Texas, who cast their ballots within the framework of the law.
Indeed, this would apply equally to all citizens who voted within the framework of the law across the United States!
President Trump also tweeted that this case is, "very strong...ALL CRITERIA MET."
Please continue to SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition, now.
____________________________________________________________________
PETITION UPDATE (12/7/20) - Since this petition was launched, President Trump's legal team, as well as other concerned citizens, have discovered what appears to be irrefutable evidence of voter fraud in several of the key battleground states, and have initiated legal challenges in six states.
While the situation continues to evolve, this remains a hugely important petition which we encourage you to SIGN and SHARE.
Below, please WATCH and READ about the mounting evidence of voter fraud and how the mainstream media seem determined to ignore even the most egregious instances of vote tampering. Then, please SIGN and SHARE this petition.
'Trump: ‘Our election system is now under assault and siege’ and as president I must defend it'
'Tens of thousands 2020 election votes illegally scanned in Detroit, says Dominion IT contractor'
'Trump campaign files lawsuit demanding ‘a new statewide election for president’ in Georgia'
'Experts flag over 500k ballots in PA with new evidence of major 2020 election voter fraud'
''Smoking gun'? Pennsylvania vote fraud hearing gets gasps from audience'
'FBI and Justice Department have dragged their feet investigating 2020 vote fraud'
''CNN top brass in leaked tape: We won't give Trump 'too much of a platform on his not conceding'
'Twitter censored Trump 63 times over Thanksgiving holiday, Biden untouched'
LifeSite supports President Trump with this petition because we believe he is trying to defend the Constitution, ensuring that electoral fraud does not taint the result of the 2020 general election.
But, since starting this petition, we have launched a separate petition related to the disputed election outcome, calling on the Department of Justice to 'do their job' and engage in meaningful investigations of the mounting evidence of voter fraud.
We believe that conducting forensic audits of ballots and voting machines, as well as issuing subpoenas to collect more evidence, would be a good start.
Thankfully, some of the state started to demand investigations independent of federal agencies. But we still believe that the DoJ needs to use its enormous fact-finding resources to help resolve allegations of election fraud.
Thank you for continuing to SIGN and SHARE all our election-related petitions.
_____________________________________________________________________
Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition which calls on all Americans to Stand With President Trump as he uses every legitimate means to find out if voter fraud played any role in the election outcome.
Amid allegations of voter fraud, and at a time when the situation with COVID has been used by many of the states to facilitate the use of mail-in ballots on a massive scale, we need to be very careful in dismissing the possibility of voter fraud.
The fact is, the possibility of wide-spread fraud with mail-in ballots is significant.
But, this is not about Donald Trump or Joe Biden! This about whether or not the sanctity of the ballot box has been tampered with!
Please Stand With President Trump as he attempts to defend the integrity of this election, as well as well as the right to vote itself!
Indeed, this is so important, not so much because one election hangs in the balance, but because our democracy, itself, hangs in the balance.
Americans not only have a right to know, but should demand that every legitimate means be used to discover the truth about these elections!
Please SIGN this petition and Stand With President Trump to ensure that these elections were conducted freely and fairly!
While most all Americans believe in playing by the rules, we also know that some very devious, politically-motivated operatives have been trying to harm the Trump administration from before he even took the oath of office.
This fact should lead us to question how some allegations of voter fraud can be so easily dismissed by state election authorities.
We demand to know the truth, and, for the sake of our democracy, we demand that President Trump keep fighting to learn the truth.
Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this petition today!
**Photo Credit: Shealah Craighead / White House / Flickr


lifesitenews--2020-12-09--Join our daily worldwide rosary HERE

Join our daily worldwide rosary HERE

December 9 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) – In response to the crisis unfolding in our world and in the Church , LifeSite is offering Catholics throughout the world a chance to be united daily in prayer , in the Our Lady of Fatima Rosary Crusade .
Catholics from all over the world—from Israel , Uganda , Italy , France , Germany , Ireland , Pakistan , Singapore , the Philippines , India , Indonesia , Australia , New Zealand , Thailand , the United Kingdom , the U.S. , Canada , Brazil , and other countries—are gathering daily to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Anthony Pillari , J.C.L.
, an American priest currently studying in Italy .
Our goal is , by means of this daily rosary and by embracing and living out the message given by the Virgin Mary at Fatima , the triumph of Our Lady ’ s Immaculate Heart .
To help obtain that goal , Bishop Athanasius Schneider graciously composed the following prayer for this worldwide rosary crusade : O Immaculate Heart of Mary , you are the holy Mother of God and our tender Mother .
Look upon the distress in which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are living because of the spread of materialism and the persecution of the Church .
In Fatima you warned against these errors , as you spoke about the errors of Russia .
You are the Mediatrix of all graces .
Implore your Divine Son to grant this special grace for the Pope : that he might consecrate Russia to your Immaculate Heart , so that Russia will be converted , a period of peace will be granted to the world , and your Immaculate Heart will triumph , through an authentic renewal of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ purity of the Catholic Faith , of the sacredness of Divine worship and of the holiness of the Christian life .
O Queen of the holy Rosary and our sweet Mother , turn your merciful eyes to us and graciously hear this our trusting prayer .
Amen .
+ Athanasius Schneider , Auxiliary Bishop of the archdiocese of Saint Mary in Astana To learn more about the urgency of responding to Our Lady ’ s message at Fatima , and about what you can do , please read Cardinal Burke ’ s 2017 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ https : //voiceofthefamily.com/full-text-cardinal-burkes-historic-call-for-consecration-of-russia/ ) .
As St. Padre Pio once said , “ The rosary is the weapon for these times.
” Through prayer , God can shape history , change the world , and bring about a great time of renewal and peace for the Church and for the world , through the triumph of Our Lady ’ s Immaculate Heart .
Join us today !
If you would like to follow along with the prayers said during this rosary , you can access them via this PDF .
This document also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the daily rosary on LifeSite led by Fr .
Pillari .

(LifeSiteNews) — In response to the crisis unfolding in our world and in the Church, LifeSite is happy to promote Regina Angelorum Press’s Daily Rosary, which is offering Catholics throughout the world the chance to be united daily in prayer, in the Our Lady of Fatima Rosary Crusade.
Catholics from all over the world — from Israel, Uganda, Italy, France, Germany, Ireland, Pakistan, Singapore, the Philippines, India, Indonesia, Australia, New Zealand, Thailand, the United Kingdom, the U.S., Canada, Brazil, and other countries — are gathering daily to pray the Rosary, led by Father Pillari, JCL, MCL, STL, an American priest currently studying in Italy.
The Daily Rosary is being offered each day at 12noon EST through Regina Angelorum Press’ YouTube Channel to which you can subscribe HERE.
The goal is, by means of this Daily Rosary and by embracing and living out the message given by the Virgin Mary at Fatima, the triumph of Our Lady’s Immaculate Heart.
To help obtain that goal, Bishop Athanasius Schneider graciously composed the following prayer for this worldwide Rosary crusade:
O Immaculate Heart of Mary, you are the holy Mother of God and our tender Mother. Look upon the distress in which the Church and the whole of humanity are living because of the spread of materialism and the persecution of the Church. In Fatima you warned against these errors, as you spoke about the errors of Russia. You are the Mediatrix of all graces. Implore your Divine Son to grant this special grace for the Pope: that he might consecrate Russia to your Immaculate Heart, so that Russia will be converted, a period of peace will be granted to the world, and your Immaculate Heart will triumph, through an authentic renewal of the Church in the splendor of the purity of the Catholic Faith, of the sacredness of Divine worship and of the holiness of the Christian life. O Queen of the holy Rosary and our sweet Mother, turn your merciful eyes to us and graciously hear this our trusting prayer. Amen. + Athanasius Schneider, Auxiliary Bishop of the archdiocese of Saint Mary in Astana
To learn more about the urgency of responding to Our Lady’s message at Fatima, and about what you can do, please read Cardinal Burke’s 2017 address at the Rome Life Forum.
As St. Padre Pio once said, “The Rosary is the weapon for these times.” Through prayer, God can shape history, change the world, and bring about a great time of renewal and peace for the Church and for the world, through the triumph of Our Lady’s Immaculate Heart. Join us today!
If you would like to follow along with the prayers said during this Rosary, you can access them HERE. The document also includes a brief F.A.Q. pertaining to the daily Rosary.
You can send your prayer requests to https://reginangelorumpress.com/prayer-intentions/
Share


lifesitenews--2020-12-09--BREAKING: Canada approves Pfizer vaccine tested on cell line of aborted baby

OTTAWA , Canada , December 9 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) — Canada has approved the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine , which was tested using fetal cells from an aborted baby , Health Canada announced Wednesday .
“ The data provided supports favourably the efficacy of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine as well as its safety , ” the government agency said in its report authorizing use in Canada .
“ The vaccine is approved for people who are 16 years of age and older .
Its safety and effectiveness in people younger than 16 years of age have not yet been established @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Minister Justin Trudeau said on Monday that up to 249,000 doses of the two-dose vaccine will be on hand by the end of the year , reported the CBC .
He said the shots are mainly earmarked for long-term care home residents and the staff .
Canada is ready to receive up to 249,000 doses this month , and 4 million doses of the vaccine by March , according to the Associated Press .
The Canadian government has purchased 20 million doses of the vaccine , and it has the option to buy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s national operations center is ready to deploy the vaccines once approved , according to previous statements by Major-General Dany Fortin , head of vaccine logistics for the Public Health Agency of Canada .
Fortin has been conducting a series of “ dry runs ” with the provinces and territories to make sure they are ready to distribute the Pfizer vaccine , which uses mRNA technology and must be stored at temperatures between -80 and -60 degrees Celsius ( between -112 and -76 degrees Fahrenheit ) , CBC reported .
Canada is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the vaccine next week from the Belgium town of Puurs , which “ will be churning out hundreds of millions of doses of the co-developed Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for the European Union , Canada , Japan and the United Kingdom over the next 12 months , ” it reported .
Canada has contracts with six other vaccine makers , and is “ currently reviewing three other vaccines including one by Moderna that Canadian health officials said could be approved soon , ” according to the Associated Press .
The government said “ 14 distribution @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cities initially , ” and that “ there will be at least one in each province and two each in Canada ’ s four largest provinces , ” it reported .
Dr. David Williams , Chief Medical Officer of Ontario , stated on December 3 that proof of COVID-19 vaccination could be mandatory in order to have freedom to move around as well as access to various buildings and facilities .
The Health Canada website minimizes the possible adverse side effects from receiving the Pfizer vaccine .
The side effects observed in clinical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ might have with other vaccines , ” and were “ mild or moderate.
” These “ included things like pain at the site of injection , body chills , feeling tired and feeling feverish , ” which are “ common side effects of vaccines and do not pose a risk to health , ” Health Canada states .
“ As with all vaccines , there ’ s a chance that there will be a serious side effect , but these are rare .
A serious side effect might be something like an allergic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Health Canada has conducted a rigorous scientific review of the available medical evidence to assess the safety of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine .
No major safety concerns have been identified in the data that we reviewed , ” it concluded .
However , in the U.K. , government-produced safety instructions for the Pfizer vaccine state that it should not be used by pregnant or breast-feeding mothers and children .
In addition , they state that it is unknown what effect the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine will have on fertility .
The ten-page “ Reg @ @ @ @ @ @ @ describes the vaccine , how it is to be stored , diluted , and administered , and the trial studies carried out to test it .
In a section called “ Fertility , pregnancy and lactation , ” the guide says there is “ no or limited data ” on the vaccine .
Therefore , it is not recommending its use for pregnant women .
“ Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed .
COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy , ” the guide states in section 4.6 .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination.
” The U.K. guide also advises that women should avoid becoming pregnant for the first two months after their COVID-19 shots .
Because it is still unknown whether or not the vaccine can be transmitted to a breast-feeding infant through his or her mother ’ s milk , the instructions state that “ a risk to the newborns/infants can not be excluded , ” the U.K. regulation states .
Therefore , the vaccine “ should not be used during breast-feeding.
” Moreover , the U.K. government admits @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 has an impact on fertility.
” Meanwhile , former Pfizer senior researcher Dr. Michael Yeadon , and epidemiologist and pulmonary specialist Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg have filed a petition with the European Medicines Agency ( EMA ) , responsible for approving drugs in the European Union at large , for the immediate suspension of all COVID-19 vaccine studies in Europe .
Among their concerns is the possibility of allergic and even fatal reactions to a coronavirus vaccine , and that it may result in sterility in women .
“ These vaccinations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ‘ spike proteins ’ such as COVID-19 .
However , ‘ spike proteins ’ also contain syncytin-homologous proteins , which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans , ” they stated .
The petitioners demand that “ [ it ] must be absolutely ruled out ” that a coronavirus vaccine would not trigger an immune reaction against this protein , “ as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.
” Yeadon , who held Pfizer ’ s most senior research position in the field @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his departure in 2011 , is also categorically opposed to a COVID-19 vaccine .
“ There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic .
I ’ ve never heard such nonsense talked about vaccines , ” he stated in a November article .
“ You do not vaccinate people who aren ’ t at risk from a disease .
You also don ’ t set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn ’ t been extensively tested on human subjects.
” With @ @ @ @ @ @ @ McLean .
To respectfully express your concerns , contact your Member of Parliament .
It is suggested that a phone call makes more of on an impact than an email .
For a list of MPs , go here .
5 questions about the coronavirus vaccine that should scare everyone SIGN : Join petition calling for a stop to COVID vaccine testing in Europe Former Pfizer VP : ‘ No need for vaccines , ’ ‘ the pandemic is effectively over ’ 10 actions Trump must take NOW to save the Republic and @ @ @ @ @

Even though Health Canada deems the vaccine to be safe, the UK government says pregnant or breast-feeding mothers shouldn’t take it.
OTTAWA, Canada, December 9, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — Canada has approved the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, which was tested using fetal cells from an aborted baby, Health Canada announced Wednesday.
Children of God for Life reports that although the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was not developed using a cell line derived from an aborted baby, it was tested — that is, the laboratory phase which verifies the quality of the vaccine on cell tissues — using the HEK-293 cell line, which was derived from an aborted baby.
“The data provided supports favourably the efficacy of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine as well as its safety,” the government agency said in its report authorizing use in Canada.
“The vaccine is approved for people who are 16 years of age and older. Its safety and effectiveness in people younger than 16 years of age have not yet been established,” the report stated.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said on Monday that up to 249,000 doses of the two-dose vaccine will be on hand by the end of the year, reported the CBC. He said the shots are mainly earmarked for long-term care home residents and the staff.
Canada is ready to receive up to 249,000 doses this month, and 4 million doses of the vaccine by March, according to the Associated Press. The Canadian government has purchased 20 million doses of the vaccine, and it has the option to buy 56 million more.
The Canadian military’s national operations center is ready to deploy the vaccines once approved, according to previous statements by Major-General Dany Fortin, head of vaccine logistics for the Public Health Agency of Canada.
Fortin has been conducting a series of “dry runs” with the provinces and territories to make sure they are ready to distribute the Pfizer vaccine, which uses mRNA technology and must be stored at temperatures between -80 and -60 degrees Celsius (between -112 and -76 degrees Fahrenheit), CBC reported.
Canada is expected to receive the first shipments of the vaccine next week from the Belgium town of Puurs, which “will be churning out hundreds of millions of doses of the co-developed Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for the European Union, Canada, Japan and the United Kingdom over the next 12 months,” it reported.
Canada has contracts with six other vaccine makers, and is “currently reviewing three other vaccines including one by Moderna that Canadian health officials said could be approved soon,” according to the Associated Press.
The government said “14 distribution centers will be located in large Canadian cities initially,” and that “there will be at least one in each province and two each in Canada’s four largest provinces,” it reported.
Dr. David Williams, Chief Medical Officer of Ontario, stated on December 3 that proof of COVID-19 vaccination could be mandatory in order to have freedom to move around as well as access to various buildings and facilities.
The Health Canada website minimizes the possible adverse side effects from receiving the Pfizer vaccine.
The side effects observed in clinical trials were “similar to what you might have with other vaccines,” and were “mild or moderate.”
These “included things like pain at the site of injection, body chills, feeling tired and feeling feverish,” which are “common side effects of vaccines and do not pose a risk to health,” Health Canada states.
“As with all vaccines, there’s a chance that there will be a serious side effect, but these are rare. A serious side effect might be something like an allergic reaction,” it stated.
— Article continues below Petition — PETITION: No to government and corporate penalties for refusing COVID-19 vaccine Show Petition Text 103183 have signed the petition. Let's get to 125000 ! Thank you for signing this petition! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Country... State... Sign this Petition **Photo credit: Shutterstock.com Mainstream media sources are promoting offensive suggestions by some doctors that people who refuse a vaccine for COVID-19 should be "punished" by the government and by business - effectively coercing them into taking the vaccine. One group of doctors writing in 'USA Today' suggested that the government impose special taxes (i.e., fines) on people who refuse the vaccination and that business simply refuse to serve them. [see story below]
Another doctor writing in an online publication called 'The Conversation' shamelessly suggested that people who refuse a vaccine should be given a psychoactive drug to induce compliance. [see story below] But, these suggestions are plain political posturing, and have nothing to do with science or with the recent trends of the disease. And, in case they haven't noticed, we live in a democracy not a medical dictatorship! Please SIGN this urgent petition which asks policy-makers and business people, at all levels, to pledge to respect the rights of those who, in good conscience, decide not to vaccinate themselves or their children. People should not have to live in fear of governmental or corporate retribution for refusing a vaccine which is being rushed to market by Big Pharma and their fellow-travelers in NGOs, like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. It would be intolerable and immoral for the government or business to coerce someone, and their family, to take a COVID vaccine against their will to avoid a fine, or just so they can do their weekly grocery shopping. Medical freedom must be respected in principle and also in practice. So, it is now time that our policy-makers listen to all voices involved in this vital conversation, and start to represent those who will not tolerate being punished for refusing a vaccine. Simply put, legislatures must begin to act as legislatures again. Questions must be asked. Hearings and investigations must be held. And, the legislatures of each state and country must return to the business of representing the people who voted for them, assuming their rightful place as the originator of legislation. We can no longer accept the dictates of executive branches without question, especially now that, statistically speaking, the initial brunt of the COVID crisis has passed. Neither can we accept the dictates of doctors who seem detached from reality and from science, and who only seem to be attached to the idea of promoting ideas which contribute to the agrandizement of power and control of political interests, and wealth of those who stand to make a lot of money from the sale of a COVID vaccine. Please SIGN this urgent petition which asks government and business leaders to pledge to respect the rights of those who refuse a COVID vaccine, and not seek to punish them for doing so. FOR MORE INFORMATION: 'Doctors lay out plan to ‘punish’ people who refuse coronavirus vaccine: ‘There is no alternative’' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/doctors-lay-out-plan-to-punish-people-who-refuse-coronavirus-vaccine-there-is-no-alternative 'US professor: ‘Psychoactive pill’ should be covertly administered to ensure lockdown compliance' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-professor-ensure-lockdown-compliance-by-drugging-dissenters-with-psychoactive-pill Hide Petition Text Sign this Petition
“Health Canada has conducted a rigorous scientific review of the available medical evidence to assess the safety of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. No major safety concerns have been identified in the data that we reviewed,” it concluded.
However, in the U.K., government-produced safety instructions for the Pfizer vaccine state that it should not be used by pregnant or breast-feeding mothers and children.
In addition, they state that it is unknown what effect the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine will have on fertility.
The ten-page “Reg 174 Information for UK Healthcare Professionals” describes the vaccine, how it is to be stored, diluted, and administered, and the trial studies carried out to test it.
In a section called “Fertility, pregnancy and lactation,” the guide says there is “no or limited data” on the vaccine. Therefore, it is not recommending its use for pregnant women.
“Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy,” the guide states in section 4.6.
“For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination.”
The U.K. guide also advises that women should avoid becoming pregnant for the first two months after their COVID-19 shots.
Because it is still unknown whether or not the vaccine can be transmitted to a breast-feeding infant through his or her mother’s milk, the instructions state that “a risk to the newborns/infants cannot be excluded,” the U.K. regulation states. Therefore, the vaccine “should not be used during breast-feeding.”
Moreover, the U.K. government admits, “It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 has an impact on fertility.”
Meanwhile, former Pfizer senior researcher Dr. Michael Yeadon, and epidemiologist and pulmonary specialist Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg have filed a petition with the European Medicines Agency (EMA), responsible for approving drugs in the European Union at large, for the immediate suspension of all COVID-19 vaccine studies in Europe.
Among their concerns is the possibility of allergic and even fatal reactions to a coronavirus vaccine, and that it may result in sterility in women.
“These vaccinations are expected to produce anti-bodies to attack ‘spike proteins’ such as COVID-19. However, ‘spike proteins’ also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans,” they stated.
The petitioners demand that “[it] must be absolutely ruled out” that a coronavirus vaccine would not trigger an immune reaction against this protein, “as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.”
Yeadon, who held Pfizer’s most senior research position in the field of allergy and respiratory medicines prior to his departure in 2011, is also categorically opposed to a COVID-19 vaccine.
“There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic. I’ve never heard such nonsense talked about vaccines,” he stated in a November article.
“You do not vaccinate people who aren’t at risk from a disease. You also don’t set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn’t been extensively tested on human subjects.”
With files from Patrick Delaney and Dorothy Cummings McLean.
To respectfully express your concerns, contact your Member of Parliament. It is suggested that a phone call makes more of on an impact than an email. For a list of MPs, go here.
RELATED
Pfizer COVID jab warning: No breastfeeding, avoid pregnancy for 2 months, unknown fertility impacts
5 questions about the coronavirus vaccine that should scare everyone
SIGN: Join petition calling for a stop to COVID vaccine testing in Europe
Former Pfizer VP: ‘No need for vaccines,’ ‘the pandemic is effectively over’
10 actions Trump must take NOW to save the Republic and world from impending globalist tyranny
Share