lifesitenews--2020-12-16--Bill C-6 could see Canadian parents jailed for using the ‘birth name’ of gender confused children

OTTAWA , December 16 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) — The Justin Trudeau government bill criminalizing helping minors deal with unwanted same-sex attraction or gender confusion has been amended such that , if it passes , parents could now also be jailed for up to 5 years for recognizing their child ’ s biological sex .
On December 11 , the day before Parliament recessed for a six-week Christmas break , the House of Commons justice committee approved five amendments to Bill C-6 , which was tabled in October by Liberal Justice Minister David Lametti .
Known as the “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will make it a crime punishable by five years in jail to give minor Canadians — which it defines as anyone under age 18 — help to overcome same-sex attraction or gender confusion or to remove a minor from Canada to seek such help .
The result of the committee ’ s amendments — most significantly , adding “ gender expression ” to the definition of “ conversion therapy ” — is to “ expand and strengthen this totalitarian legislation , ” said David Cooke , director of campaigns for Campaign Life Coalition @ @ @ @ @ @ @ national political lobbying group .
The Liberal and NDP members of the committee “ shut their ears and hardened their hearts , ” he said in a December 15 email to supporters .
“ Instead of listening to the serious concerns brought forth by scores of qualified medical experts , church leaders , ex-LGBT representatives , and parental rights groups , ” these committee members “ actually intensified their plan to punish those who share a traditional , Christian view on sexuality and gender !
” said Cooke .
That was echoed by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ parental rights ’ group Parents As First Educators ( PAFE ) .
“ Last week , the Liberals and NDP voted down all amendments designed to provide some protections for parents , clinicians , and spiritual advisors , ” she wrote in a December 14 email to supporters .
“ In addition to voting down amendments , the Liberals dug in their heels by sneakily introducing a new amendment of their own on the day of clause by clause reading – a move vociferously protested by the Conservatives and Bloc Québécois members – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the definition of conversion therapy , ” Pierre stated .
“ With this Liberal amendment to Bill C-6 , parents who call their gender confused child by their ‘ birth name , ’ their biological sex or any other ‘ gender expression ’ may be subjected to a five-year prison term , according to Bill C-6 !
” she said .
Bill C-6 , “ as amended , literally transfers parental authority over to the LGBT activists , taking away every right to object to even the most obscene , harmful , immoral @ @ @ @ @ @ @ expressions being promoted , ” he said .
Liberal and NDP committee members also amended Bill C-6 to “ extend the censorship provisions in Bill C-6 ” and make it a crime not only to “ advertise ” but to “ promote ” any “ offer to provide counselling for unwanted same-sex attraction or gender dysphoria , ” he noted .
“ This will ensure that any public messages , articles , pamphlets , books , web pages , websites , or YouTube videos espousing a traditional view of sexuality or gender can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ , ” contended Cooke .
“ This will no doubt include portions of the Bible , like 1 Corinthians 6:9-11 .
It may even prohibit the Bible itself , which is , after all , a Book all about ‘ conversion ’ !
” he said , adding that “ there are no religious exemptions in Bill C-6.
” The committee further approved an amendment that lowers the “ threshold for police to bring charges ” for violating the bill , Cooke said .
Bill C-6 initially made it a crime to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ adult “ against the person ’ s will , ” which put the onus on the recipient “ to object to the counselling or advice given , ” he explained .
“ Now the onus is on those offering the counsel or advice to first obtain ‘ consent ’ from any adult before ever speaking a word !
” he said .
“ That means that we dare not say anything from the traditional perspective on sexuality or gender without fear of being charged for not first obtaining consent , ” added Cooke @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the justice committee , Campaign Life argued that Bill C-6 violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms “ because it restricts speech and belief in a manner that is not reasonable in a free and democratic society.
” Prepared by Calgary-based constitutional lawyer Carol Crosson , the 34-page legal opinion was supported by 481 pages of citations from legal authorities .
It argued that Bill C-6 does not have a unconstitutional purpose ; does not have a valid public purpose ; is impermissibly vague ; its effects are contrary to Charter sections @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) , and 7 ; its effects are not minimally impairing ; the ability to make fundamental choices is limited ; and It infringes on the rights of parents and children .
Bill C-6 adds five new offences to the Criminal Code : causing “ a child ” to undergo conversion therapy , removing “ a child ” from Canada to undergo conversion therapy abroad , causing a person to undergo conversion therapy without the person ’ s consent ( as amended ) , profiting from providing conversion therapy , and advertising , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ offer to provide conversion therapy .
The first three offenses are punishable by up to five years in prison , the last two by up to two years in prison .
Bill C-6 ’ s amended definition of “ conversion therapy ” is : “ a practice , treatment or service designed to change a person ’ s sexual orientation to heterosexual , gender identity or to cisgender or to repress or reduce non-heterosexual attraction or sexual behaviour .
” “ Cisgender ” is a term that LGBT activists use to describe people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The original bill added : “ For greater certainty , this definition does not include a practice , treatment or service that relates to a person ’ s gender transition ; or to a person ’ s exploration of their identity or to its development.
” The amended version states : “ For greater certainty , this definition does not include a practice , treatment or service that relates to the exploration and development of an integrated personal identity without favouring any particular sexual orientation , gender identity or gender expression .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ for conversion therapy ” — which it defines as “ any material — including a photographic , film , video , audio or other recording , made by any means , a visual representation or any written material ” — in Section 164 of the Criminal Code , which deals with the making and dissemination of child pornography , obscene material , voyeuristic recordings , and intimate images .
The bill passed second reading with an overwhelming majority vote of 306 to seven , with the opposing votes all from Conservative Party MPs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Arnold Viersen , Bob Zimmer , Ted Falk , Tom Kmiec , and Damien Kurek .
A number of Tory MPs known as social conservatives voted yes to send the bill to the Justice Committee , including Cathay Wagantall and Nellie Shin , while former Conservative leader Andrew Scheer skipped the vote along with a handful of other Conservative MPs .
With the justice committee approving the bill as amended , it is set for third and final vote after the House returns on January 25 , and it will then proceed to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all concerned Canadians to ramp up their protests of the bill .
“ I would ask you to consider reaching out to your Member of Parliament over Christmas not only to wish him or her the greetings of the season , but also to state your opposition to Bill C-6 ( the conversion therapy ban ) , ” Cooke said .
“ Here we see the government controlling and compelling our speech – telling us what to say and how to think !
” added Cooke .
“ The Trudeau Liberals are claiming @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sexuality and gender – the radical LGBT lobby ’ s viewpoint.As for everyone else – we must either shut up or go to jail.
” For contact information for your MP , and to access a tool to help compose a letter to your MP opposing Bill C-6 , go here at Campaign Life ’ s Stop the Ban website .
To sign Campaign Life ’ s petition , go here .

OTTAWA, December 16, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — The Justin Trudeau government bill criminalizing helping minors deal with unwanted same-sex attraction or gender confusion has been amended such that, if it passes, parents could now also be jailed for up to 5 years for recognizing their child’s biological sex.
On December 11, the day before Parliament recessed for a six-week Christmas break, the House of Commons justice committee approved five amendments to Bill C-6, which was tabled in October by Liberal Justice Minister David Lametti.
Known as the “conversion therapy ban,” Bill C-6 will make it a crime punishable by five years in jail to give minor Canadians — which it defines as anyone under age 18 — help to overcome same-sex attraction or gender confusion or to remove a minor from Canada to seek such help.
The result of the committee’s amendments — most significantly, adding “gender expression” to the definition of “conversion therapy” — is to “expand and strengthen this totalitarian legislation,” said David Cooke, director of campaigns for Campaign Life Coalition, Canada’s pro-life, pro-family national political lobbying group.
The Liberal and NDP members of the committee “shut their ears and hardened their hearts,” he said in a December 15 email to supporters.
“Instead of listening to the serious concerns brought forth by scores of qualified medical experts, church leaders, ex-LGBT representatives, and parental rights groups,” these committee members “actually intensified their plan to punish those who share a traditional, Christian view on sexuality and gender!” said Cooke.
That was echoed by Teresa Pierre, president of the Ontario-based parental rights’ group Parents As First Educators (PAFE).
“Last week, the Liberals and NDP voted down all amendments designed to provide some protections for parents, clinicians, and spiritual advisors,” she wrote in a December 14 email to supporters.
“In addition to voting down amendments, the Liberals dug in their heels by sneakily introducing a new amendment of their own on the day of clause by clause reading – a move vociferously protested by the Conservatives and Bloc Québécois members – to add ‘gender expression’ to the definition of conversion therapy,” Pierre stated.
“With this Liberal amendment to Bill C-6, parents who call their gender confused child by their ‘birth name,’ their biological sex or any other ‘gender expression’ may be subjected to a five-year prison term, according to Bill C-6!” she said.
Cooke agreed.
Bill C-6, “as amended, literally transfers parental authority over to the LGBT activists, taking away every right to object to even the most obscene, harmful, immoral, and foolhardy sexual practices and gender expressions being promoted,” he said.
Liberal and NDP committee members also amended Bill C-6 to “extend the censorship provisions in Bill C-6” and make it a crime not only to “advertise” but to “promote” any “offer to provide counselling for unwanted same-sex attraction or gender dysphoria,” he noted.
“This will ensure that any public messages, articles, pamphlets, books, web pages, websites, or YouTube videos espousing a traditional view of sexuality or gender can be ‘seized’ or ‘deleted’,” contended Cooke.
“This will no doubt include portions of the Bible, like 1 Corinthians 6:9-11. It may even prohibit the Bible itself, which is, after all, a Book all about ‘conversion’!” he said, adding that “there are no religious exemptions in Bill C-6.”
The committee further approved an amendment that lowers the “threshold for police to bring charges” for violating the bill, Cooke said.
Bill C-6 initially made it a crime to provide “conversion therapy” to an adult “against the person’s will,” which put the onus on the recipient “to object to the counselling or advice given,” he explained.
“Now the onus is on those offering the counsel or advice to first obtain ‘consent’ from any adult before ever speaking a word!” he said.
“That means that we dare not say anything from the traditional perspective on sexuality or gender without fear of being charged for not first obtaining consent,” added Cooke.
Bill C-6 violates the Charter: Campaign Life
In a constitutional legal opinion submitted to the justice committee, Campaign Life argued that Bill C-6 violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms “because it restricts speech and belief in a manner that is not reasonable in a free and democratic society.”
Prepared by Calgary-based constitutional lawyer Carol Crosson, the 34-page legal opinion was supported by 481 pages of citations from legal authorities.
It argued that Bill C-6 does not have a unconstitutional purpose; does not have a valid public purpose; is impermissibly vague; its effects are contrary to Charter sections 2(a), (b), and 7; its effects are not minimally impairing; the ability to make fundamental choices is limited; and It infringes on the rights of parents and children.
Bill C-6 adds five new offences to the Criminal Code: causing “a child” to undergo conversion therapy, removing “a child” from Canada to undergo conversion therapy abroad, causing a person to undergo conversion therapy without the person’s consent (as amended), profiting from providing conversion therapy, and advertising, or promoting (as amended) an offer to provide conversion therapy.
The first three offenses are punishable by up to five years in prison, the last two by up to two years in prison.
Bill C-6’s amended definition of “conversion therapy” is: “a practice, treatment or service designed to change a person’s sexual orientation to heterosexual, to change a person’s gender identity or gender expression to cisgender or to repress or reduce non-heterosexual attraction or sexual behaviour or non-cisgender gender expression .”
“Cisgender” is a term that LGBT activists use to describe people who acknowledge and accept their biological sex.
The original bill added: “For greater certainty, this definition does not include a practice, treatment or service that relates to a person’s gender transition; or to a person’s exploration of their identity or to its development.”
The amended version states: “For greater certainty, this definition does not include a practice, treatment or service that relates to the exploration and development of an integrated personal identity without favouring any particular sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression .”
Bill C-6 also inserts “advertisement for conversion therapy” — which it defines as “any material — including a photographic, film, video, audio or other recording, made by any means, a visual representation or any written material” — in Section 164 of the Criminal Code, which deals with the making and dissemination of child pornography, obscene material, voyeuristic recordings, and intimate images.
The bill passed second reading with an overwhelming majority vote of 306 to seven, with the opposing votes all from Conservative Party MPs: Derek Sloan, Jeremy Patzer, Arnold Viersen, Bob Zimmer, Ted Falk, Tom Kmiec, and Damien Kurek.
A number of Tory MPs known as social conservatives voted yes to send the bill to the Justice Committee, including Cathay Wagantall and Nellie Shin, while former Conservative leader Andrew Scheer skipped the vote along with a handful of other Conservative MPs.
With the justice committee approving the bill as amended, it is set for third and final vote after the House returns on January 25, and it will then proceed to the Senate.
Campaign Life is urging all concerned Canadians to ramp up their protests of the bill.
“I would ask you to consider reaching out to your Member of Parliament over Christmas not only to wish him or her the greetings of the season, but also to state your opposition to Bill C-6 (the conversion therapy ban),” Cooke said.
“Bill C-6 is a draconian proposal,” he asserted.
“Here we see the government controlling and compelling our speech – telling us what to say and how to think!” added Cooke.
“The Trudeau Liberals are claiming there is only one valid viewpoint on sexuality and gender – the radical LGBT lobby’s viewpoint.As for everyone else – we must either shut up or go to jail.”
For contact information for your MP, and to access a tool to help compose a letter to your MP opposing Bill C-6, go here at Campaign Life’s Stop the Ban website. To sign Campaign Life’s petition, go here.
Share


lifesitenews--2020-12-16--Join our daily worldwide rosary HERE

Join our daily worldwide rosary HERE

December 16 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) – In response to the crisis unfolding in our world and in the Church , LifeSite is offering Catholics throughout the world a chance to be united daily in prayer , in the Our Lady of Fatima Rosary Crusade .
Catholics from all over the world—from Israel , Uganda , Italy , France , Germany , Ireland , Pakistan , Singapore , the Philippines , India , Indonesia , Australia , New Zealand , Thailand , the United Kingdom , the U.S. , Canada , Brazil , and other countries—are gathering daily to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Anthony Pillari , J.C.L.
, an American priest currently studying in Italy .
Our goal is , by means of this daily rosary and by embracing and living out the message given by the Virgin Mary at Fatima , the triumph of Our Lady ’ s Immaculate Heart .
To help obtain that goal , Bishop Athanasius Schneider graciously composed the following prayer for this worldwide rosary crusade : O Immaculate Heart of Mary , you are the holy Mother of God and our tender Mother .
Look upon the distress in which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are living because of the spread of materialism and the persecution of the Church .
In Fatima you warned against these errors , as you spoke about the errors of Russia .
You are the Mediatrix of all graces .
Implore your Divine Son to grant this special grace for the Pope : that he might consecrate Russia to your Immaculate Heart , so that Russia will be converted , a period of peace will be granted to the world , and your Immaculate Heart will triumph , through an authentic renewal of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ purity of the Catholic Faith , of the sacredness of Divine worship and of the holiness of the Christian life .
O Queen of the holy Rosary and our sweet Mother , turn your merciful eyes to us and graciously hear this our trusting prayer .
Amen .
+ Athanasius Schneider , Auxiliary Bishop of the archdiocese of Saint Mary in Astana To learn more about the urgency of responding to Our Lady ’ s message at Fatima , and about what you can do , please read Cardinal Burke ’ s 2017 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ https : //voiceofthefamily.com/full-text-cardinal-burkes-historic-call-for-consecration-of-russia/ ) .
As St. Padre Pio once said , “ The rosary is the weapon for these times.
” Through prayer , God can shape history , change the world , and bring about a great time of renewal and peace for the Church and for the world , through the triumph of Our Lady ’ s Immaculate Heart .
Join us today !
If you would like to follow along with the prayers said during this rosary , you can access them via this PDF .
This document also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the daily rosary on LifeSite led by Fr .
Pillari .

(LifeSiteNews) — In response to the crisis unfolding in our world and in the Church, LifeSite is happy to promote Regina Angelorum Press’s Daily Rosary, which is offering Catholics throughout the world the chance to be united daily in prayer, in the Our Lady of Fatima Rosary Crusade.
Catholics from all over the world — from Israel, Uganda, Italy, France, Germany, Ireland, Pakistan, Singapore, the Philippines, India, Indonesia, Australia, New Zealand, Thailand, the United Kingdom, the U.S., Canada, Brazil, and other countries — are gathering daily to pray the Rosary, led by Father Pillari, JCL, MCL, STL, an American priest currently studying in Italy.
The Daily Rosary is being offered each day at 12noon EST through Regina Angelorum Press’ YouTube Channel to which you can subscribe HERE.
The goal is, by means of this Daily Rosary and by embracing and living out the message given by the Virgin Mary at Fatima, the triumph of Our Lady’s Immaculate Heart.
To help obtain that goal, Bishop Athanasius Schneider graciously composed the following prayer for this worldwide Rosary crusade:
O Immaculate Heart of Mary, you are the holy Mother of God and our tender Mother. Look upon the distress in which the Church and the whole of humanity are living because of the spread of materialism and the persecution of the Church. In Fatima you warned against these errors, as you spoke about the errors of Russia. You are the Mediatrix of all graces. Implore your Divine Son to grant this special grace for the Pope: that he might consecrate Russia to your Immaculate Heart, so that Russia will be converted, a period of peace will be granted to the world, and your Immaculate Heart will triumph, through an authentic renewal of the Church in the splendor of the purity of the Catholic Faith, of the sacredness of Divine worship and of the holiness of the Christian life. O Queen of the holy Rosary and our sweet Mother, turn your merciful eyes to us and graciously hear this our trusting prayer. Amen. + Athanasius Schneider, Auxiliary Bishop of the archdiocese of Saint Mary in Astana
To learn more about the urgency of responding to Our Lady’s message at Fatima, and about what you can do, please read Cardinal Burke’s 2017 address at the Rome Life Forum.
As St. Padre Pio once said, “The Rosary is the weapon for these times.” Through prayer, God can shape history, change the world, and bring about a great time of renewal and peace for the Church and for the world, through the triumph of Our Lady’s Immaculate Heart. Join us today!
If you would like to follow along with the prayers said during this Rosary, you can access them HERE. The document also includes a brief F.A.Q. pertaining to the daily Rosary.
You can send your prayer requests to https://reginangelorumpress.com/prayer-intentions/
Share


lifesitenews--2020-12-16--Dominion machines ‘intentionally’ generate errors and ‘influence election’, forensic audit concludes

ANTRIM , Michigan , December 16 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) – On Monday , cybersecurity analysts released the results from a forensic audit of Dominion Voting Systems machines in Michigan ’ s Antrim County , detailing widespread , deliberate software errors .
“ We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results .
The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors , ” the report says .
“ The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight , no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” it continues .
“ Based on our study , we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan .
We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.
” The investigation was conducted by Allied Security Operations Group ( ASOG ) , a Dallas-based IT group that has worked with the Trump legal team on election fraud cases .
Michigan Judge Kevin Elsenheimer had mandated forensic imaging of Antrim ’ s Dominion tabulators and other election material two weeks ago , granting a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Bailey sued the county over concerns about election integrity , citing a previous ASOG audit which found that software irregularities may have affected success of the local proposal .
He also noted that Antrim suffered from a notable “ glitch ” on Election Day that caused 6,000 Trump votes to be counted for former Vice President Biden .
A Republican clerk has taken responsibility for the issue , referring to it as a “ human error , ” although she refused calls for an independent investigation , according to Bailey .
ASOG @ @ @ @ @ @ @ consisted of visits to multiple townships , where analysts reported systematic , illegal election issues , like a massively high ballot error rate .
“ The election logs for Antrim County consist of 15,676 total lines or events .
Of the 15,676 there were a total of 10,667 critical errors/warnings or a 68.05 % error rate , ” ASOG said .
“ This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity , ” their report states .
“ The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .0008 % ) .
” ASOG interpreted that a “ high ‘ error rate ’ ” “ reflects algorithm ” designed to tilt the election for a specific candidate .
“ The statement attributing these issues to human error is not consistent with the forensic evaluation , which points more correctly to systemic machine and/or software errors , ” they said .
“ The vote flipped based on the algorithm , ” William Bailey ’ s attorney Matthew DePerno claimed .
“ It can be done manually or through a machine .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It ’ s either a function of the program , or it ’ s done offsite , ” he said ahead of the release of ASOG ’ s findings .
ASOG reported other vote changes due to Dominion tabulators memory cards being “ programmed with new ballot programming on 10/23/2020 and then again after the election.
” “ These system changes affect how ballots are read and tabulated , and our examination demonstrated a significant change in voter results using the two different programs , ” they said .
The group added @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Harbor Period ” of the Help America Vote Act , “ which prohibits changes to election systems , registries , hardware/software updates without undergoing re-certification.
” “ A staggering number of votes required adjudication , ” ASOG also related .
Adjudication is a process whereby election officials determine the votes of ballots deemed to be faulty .
“ The adjudication process is the simplest way to manually manipulate votes , ” they said .
“ [ T ] he Dominion system classifies ballots into two categories , 1 ) normal ballots and 2 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ Ballots sent to adjudication can be altered by administrators , and adjudication files can be moved… with no audit trail of which administrator actually adjudicates ( i.e .
votes ) the ballot batch.
” “ The user logged in has the ability to make major changes to the system and install software which means that there is no oversight to ensure appropriate management controls , ” their report reads .
County officials further hampered transparency by illegally deleting security logs , according to the report , which states that “ all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on November 4 , 2020 are missing.
” “ These logs would contain domain controls , authentication failures , error codes , times users logged on and off , network connections to file servers between file accesses , internet connections , times , and data transfers , ” ASOG explained .
“ Significantly , the computer system shows vote adjudication logs for prior years ; but all the adjudication log entries for the 2020 election cycle are missing , ” they stated .
“ Removal of these files violates state law and prevents @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Secretary wanted to conduct an audit.
” Other issues mentioned in the report include unsecured USB drives , unencrypted election data , and software out of date by several years .
“ There is no way this election management system could have passed tests of having been legally certified to conduct the 2020 elections in Michigan under the current laws , ” ASOG said .
Trump retweeted news of the report , calling the findings an “ Election changing result !
” Deperno said that he contacted Michigan lawmakers about the audit and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ electors “ based on what we think we ’ ve found.
” On Friday , six Michigan representatives moved to file the ASOG report as evidence in a case before the Supreme Court seeking to overturn the Michigan ’ s election results .
Top state officials have contested ASOG ’ s findings , although without directly addressing claims of wiped security logs , re-programmed election equipment , and excessive adjudication .
Dominion CEO John Paulos also disputed the report in a Michigan Senate hearing on Tuesday , after the House Oversight Committee threatened @ @ @ @ @ @ @ facing increasing censorship .
Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video library .

'Election changing result!' President Donald Trump tweeted in response to the report which found a 68% error rate in the county of Antrim in Michigan
ANTRIM, Michigan, December 16, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – On Monday, cybersecurity analysts released the results from a forensic audit of Dominion Voting Systems machines in Michigan’s Antrim County, detailing widespread, deliberate software errors.
“We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors,” the report says.
“The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail,” it continues. “Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.”
The investigation was conducted by Allied Security Operations Group (ASOG), a Dallas-based IT group that has worked with the Trump legal team on election fraud cases. Michigan Judge Kevin Elsenheimer had mandated forensic imaging of Antrim’s Dominion tabulators and other election material two weeks ago, granting a motion sought by Antrim resident William Bailey.
Bailey sued the county over concerns about election integrity, citing a previous ASOG audit which found that software irregularities may have affected success of the local proposal. He also noted that Antrim suffered from a notable “glitch” on Election Day that caused 6,000 Trump votes to be counted for former Vice President Biden. A Republican clerk has taken responsibility for the issue, referring to it as a “human error,” although she refused calls for an independent investigation, according to Bailey.
ASOG’s review of the Antrim machines consisted of visits to multiple townships, where analysts reported systematic, illegal election issues, like a massively high ballot error rate.
“The election logs for Antrim County consist of 15,676 total lines or events. Of the 15,676 there were a total of 10,667 critical errors/warnings or a 68.05% error rate,” ASOG said.
“This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity,” their report states. “The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%).” ASOG interpreted that a “high ‘error rate’” “reflects algorithm” designed to tilt the election for a specific candidate.
“The statement attributing these issues to human error is not consistent with the forensic evaluation, which points more correctly to systemic machine and/or software errors,” they said.
“The vote flipped based on the algorithm,” William Bailey’s attorney Matthew DePerno claimed. “It can be done manually or through a machine. We believe it was done through a machine. It’s either a function of the program, or it’s done offsite,” he said ahead of the release of ASOG’s findings.
ASOG reported other vote changes due to Dominion tabulators memory cards being “programmed with new ballot programming on 10/23/2020 and then again after the election.”
“These system changes affect how ballots are read and tabulated, and our examination demonstrated a significant change in voter results using the two different programs,” they said.
The group added that “this violates the 90-day Safe Harbor Period” of the Help America Vote Act, “which prohibits changes to election systems, registries, hardware/software updates without undergoing re-certification.”
“A staggering number of votes required adjudication,” ASOG also related. Adjudication is a process whereby election officials determine the votes of ballots deemed to be faulty. “The adjudication process is the simplest way to manually manipulate votes,” they said.
“[T]he Dominion system classifies ballots into two categories, 1) normal ballots and 2) adjudicated ballots,” ASOG noted. “Ballots sent to adjudication can be altered by administrators, and adjudication files can be moved… with no audit trail of which administrator actually adjudicates (i.e. votes) the ballot batch.”
“The user logged in has the ability to make major changes to the system and install software which means that there is no oversight to ensure appropriate management controls,” their report reads.
Security logs illegally deleted
County officials further hampered transparency by illegally deleting security logs, according to the report, which states that “all server security logs prior to 11:03 pm on November 4, 2020 are missing.”
“These logs would contain domain controls, authentication failures, error codes, times users logged on and off, network connections to file servers between file accesses, internet connections, times, and data transfers,” ASOG explained.
“Significantly, the computer system shows vote adjudication logs for prior years; but all the adjudication log entries for the 2020 election cycle are missing,” they stated. “Removal of these files violates state law and prevents a meaningful audit, even if the Secretary wanted to conduct an audit.”
Other issues mentioned in the report include unsecured USB drives, unencrypted election data, and software out of date by several years. “There is no way this election management system could have passed tests of having been legally certified to conduct the 2020 elections in Michigan under the current laws,” ASOG said.
Trump retweeted news of the report, calling the findings an “Election changing result!”
WOW. This report shows massive fraud. Election changing result! https://t.co/dFT3sRpUY5 — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 14, 2020
Deperno said that he contacted Michigan lawmakers about the audit and pushed for the legislature to support alternate electors “based on what we think we’ve found.” On Friday, six Michigan representatives moved to file the ASOG report as evidence in a case before the Supreme Court seeking to overturn the Michigan’s election results.
Top state officials have contested ASOG’s findings, although without directly addressing claims of wiped security logs, re-programmed election equipment, and excessive adjudication. Dominion CEO John Paulos also disputed the report in a Michigan Senate hearing on Tuesday, after the House Oversight Committee threatened to subpoena the company.
LifeSiteNews is facing increasing censorship. Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video library.
Share


lifesitenews--2020-12-16--Megyn Kelly slams ‘awful, abusive’ trans activist’s call to put all kids on puberty blockers

December 16 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) – Megyn Kelly denounced as “ awful abusive insanity ” a transgender activist ’ s call that children be put on “ puberty blockers ” until they are of sufficient age to “ consent ” to their gender .
“ It ’ s time to stop being afraid .
Fight this awful abusive insanity .
Children must be protected from these unwell activists , ” the former Fox News and NBC News host tweeted on Sunday .
Kelly , who grew up Catholic , was responding to a tweet by popular transgender blogger @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is “ Zinnia , adult demon female ” and who is a self-described “ Orlando trans activist and science writer.
” Jones tweeted that an “ inability to offer informed consent or understand the long-term consequences is actually an argument for putting every single cis and trans person on puberty blockers until they acquire that ability.
” Gender theory holds that individuals choose their own “ gender identity ” which may be at odds with their biological sex .
This is opposed to the Christian perspective that holds that the male and female @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and that it is a rebellion against natural and divine law for a man to attempt to become a woman by mutilating himself or for a woman , in like manner , to attempt to become a man .
Jones , who was born male but now claims to have “ been transitioning for the past five years , ” rose to fame in 2017 after claiming on Twitter that “ straight ” men who are “ exclusionary ” of men who think they ’ re women “ should try to work through @ @ @ @ @ @ @ women partners should be an outlier and marginal position for straight men , not some commonplace expectation , ” Jones wrote .
Jones ’ comments were covered by Fox ’ s Tucker Carlson , The Blaze , and LifeSiteNews .
Kelly left Fox News in January 2017 for NBC News .
She stayed with NBC until October 2018 .
In her first TV appearance since leaving NBC on Oct. 16 , 2019 , Kelly told Fox ’ s Tucker Carlson that the reason she first left Fox was that she wanted to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ missing my kids ’ childhood .
They were little : 7 , 5 , and 3 .
I could still see it and be part of it .
Now , I ’ m doing it .
I ’ ve spent the past year in particular , but even before that , with them .
And , I am mothering my own kids .
There is no substitute for that .
I lost my dad when I was 15 years old , and so , I know , I know on an inherent basis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do-over .
I ’ m there and I ’ m enjoying it , ” she said .
Kelly now runs her own podcast call The Megyn Kelly Show that is available on Apple .
“ The Megyn Kelly Show is your home for open , honest and illuminating conversations with the most interesting and important political , legal and cultural figures today .
No BS .
No agenda .
And no fear , ” a blurb about the show states .

PETITION UPDATE (12/11/2020)
Right before Thanksgiving, YouTube deleted a LifeSite video of a distinguished Canadian physician protesting the "unfounded public hysteria" over COVID-19 and accused us of spreading "medical misinformation."
Our account was suspended, and we were prohibited from posting videos on our YouTube channel for one week. And, while that may not seem like a big deal, it's a huge deal for a news organization like LifeSite.
Then, earlier this week, YouTube again suspended our account – this time for two weeks – over an episode of The Bishop Strickland Show wherein Bishop Strickland said he would not take an unethical COVID-19 vaccine.
We were able to appeal the suspension, and our request was granted.
This means that in YouTube's three-strikes-and-you're-out content-policing, idea-cleansing scheme, we are back down to one strike. But, we still face the threat of losing our account permanently.
And, we're not the only ones.
In a recent turn of events, YouTube just announced that it will remove videos alleging widespread voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election.
But, what is YouTube afraid of? The truth???
Thankfully, however, there is a one, big bright spot on the horizon: 48 states filed suit against Facebook just this week.
And, although this seems like a step in the right direction, the draconian measures which YouTube just rolled out, which are already wielded by Twitter, are an assault against free speech.
So, the fight for freedom of speech against Big Tech goes on. And, we must do everything we can to protect it!
Please SIGN and SHARE this petition today!
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-youtube-reverses-ban-on-lifesitenews?
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/youtube-bans-lifesite-over-video-of-bp-strickland-refusing-to-take-corona-vaccine
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/lifesites-channel-was-suspended-by-youtube-heres-how-you-can-still-watch-our-videos
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/youtube-starts-removing-videos-that-contain-allegations-of-mass-voter-fraud
https://tennesseestar.com/2020/12/10/facebook-sued-by-48-states-federal-trade-commission-over-allegations-of-monopolistic-practices/
________________________________________________________________________
PETITION UPDATE (11/18/2020)
Everyone thought the censorship by Big Tech corporations would decrease after the 2020 election, but the truth is that censorship is being felt just as much as it was before the election.
And, given the election outcome, perhaps Big Tech censorship now is even more consequential than it was before the election!
The two biggest social media platforms, Facebook and Twitter, and other Big Tech companies, are still censoring and suppressing stories and posts favorable to conservatives, and especially anything that has to do with election fraud.
Here are a few recent examples:
Women for America First organized the March for Trump on November 14, which was shut down by Facebook, MailChimp and Eventbrite. Despite Big Tech’s best efforts to cancel the event, the march went on and gathered a huge crowd.
Twitter has been suppressing a large number of President Trump’s Tweets. Most of his Tweets have been flagged arbitrarily with a warning stating: “This claim about election fraud is disputed."
Please READ this recent article about Big Tech's attempt to choke information conerning the recent Million MAGA March in Washington, DC: '5 things mainstream media won’t tell you about massive DC ‘Stop the Steal’ rally'
Then, please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition, which calls on the Congress, the president, and governors to defend freedom of speech as Big Tech continues their rampant censorship.
PETITION UPDATE (10/15/2020)
In a remarkable development, Republican Senators Ted Cruz and Lindsey Graham have announced that the Senate Judiciary Committee will be issuing subpoenas to Twitter's Jack Dorsey and Facebook's Mark Zuckerburg for their company's suppression of two critical expose news stories about how Hunter Biden and the Biden Family allegedly profited from business deals made because of Joe Biden's position as Vice President.
Please WATCH LifeSite's exclusive video of the announcement by Senator Ted Cruz below.
According to the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Senator Lindsey Graham, the subpoenas will be issued next Tuesday, for hearings to be held on Friday of next week.
This is a MASSIVE development, and should be welcomed by those who champion freedom of speech.
Again, this is all happening because Twitter and Facebook refuse to allow their members to share stories which would be favorable to conservatives.
Here's the timeline:
Yesterday, Twitter and Facebook suppressed a NY Post story about how Hunter Biden allegedly profited from introducing a Ukrainian businessman to his then-Vice President father, Joe Biden. The story also alleges that Vice President Biden then subsequently pressured Ukrainian authorities to fire a prosecutor who was investigating the businessman's company.
And, just this morning, Twitter suppressed another expose by the NY Post alleging that the Biden Family improperly profitted from deals made with one of the largest Chinese energy companies because of Vice President Biden's position in government.
But, right after the story broke, Senator Cruz tried to share the latest story on Twitter and was blocked. Twitter says that they are blocking the stories because they claim that the information was obtained illegally. However, Twitter showed no problem allowing illegally obtained information about President Trump's tax returns to be shared.
Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition, which calls on the Congress, the president, and governors to defend freedom of speech as Big Tech continues their rampant censorship.
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
'GOP senators decry Big Tech censorship of NY Post story exposing Biden corruption' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/gop-senators-decry-big-tech-censorship-of-ny-post-story-exposing-biden-corruption
___________________________________________________________________________
PETITION UPDATE (9/17/2020)
Big Tech is out to kill free speech. LifeSite is out to protect it!
LifeSite has been digging deep into the many claims of liberal bias and selective censorship of pro-life, pro-family, and conservative voices on social media.
And, we are now launching our new series 'Uncensored: Big Tech vs. Free Speech', which will unpack how the actions of Big Tech censors actually affect conservative and Christian organization and individuals.
Please WATCH the first video in our series featuring Brigitte Gabriel, the Founder of ACT For America, one of the nation's premier national security grassroots organizations.
Ms. Gabriel's organization, ACT For America, has been targeted by Big Tech especially in the manipulation of search results.
Big Tech “think[s] they are God and they are exercising their godly power over everybody else,” Gabriel explained. "Because in today's world, anytime you want to find out any information about somebody, what do you do? Google. You go to the internet to find out some information about them. When you research anything about somebody, the first thing that comes up [in the search results] is the Southern Poverty Law Center’s labeling of ‘hate groups.’”
“And who are the ‘hate groups’? Family Research Council is a hate group because they are pro-family. American Family Radio is a hate group…LifeSiteNews is a hate group. My organization is a hate group because we sound the alarm about terrorism and protecting our constitutional freedom. And so they try to character assassinate you. And they control the language.”
LifeSite's research shows that Facebook, Google, YouTube, Twitter, and others have become far too dangerous for democracy.
They can and do sway elections and public opinion in whatever direction they want, primarily by manipulating search results, tracking our online behavior, and by blocking truthful content from their platforms.
Today, LifeSite is starting to fight back, with facts and with stories of conservatives and Christians who are being negatively impacted by Big Tech's liberal bias.
Please continue to follow our 'Big Tech vs. Free Speech' series which aims to launch a new video each week for the next eight weeks.
And, please sign our petition demanding that Big Tech monopolies are broken up. Thank you!
__________________________________________________________________________
ORIGINAL PETITION BACKGROUND TEXT:
The outrageous erasing of the White Coat Summit from the internet is only the latest in a long series of brazen acts of censorship against conservatives and all those who support legitimate free speech.
You may agree or disagree with the efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine against the coronavirus, but everyone should agree on this point:
No Big Tech company should have the power to erase from the internet the medical opinions of licensed practicing doctors simply because they do not like what they have to say about the coronavirus or their experience treating it. Americans and other free peoples do not need leftist computer programmers deciding what the best course of medical treatment is for them.
Google/Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, Apple and their Big Tech friends want to control what you see, what you read, what you think, and ultimately, how you vote. Not only do they spend hundreds of millions of dollars on lobbying congress and buttering up big Washington DC think tanks, but now they brazenly and directly censor any content they don't want you to see.
Big Tech, like other interest groups, aggressively lobby to help their businesses thrive, but increasingly, Big Tech is using blatant internet censorship to impose its radical world view over those they consider to be "deplorables."
This must stop, but it won't unless we demand it as forcefully as legally possible. We believe that we have reached the point were Big Tech must be broken up if legitimate free speech is going to survive and continue to thrive on the internet.
Please sign our petition to demand real consequences for Big Tech's suppression of legitimate free speech.
In 2016, emails revealed by Fox News' Tucker Carlson proved that Google tried to influence the election by affecting voter turnout. Thankfully they failed. But they didn't give up. Instead, they have been preparing and testing how to manipulate information to continue to abuse their monopolistic power.
In 2018, Google/Youtube et. al. succeeded in manipulating the Irish abortion referendum by blacklisting pro-life videos, manipulating pro-life search terms and results and intentionally withholding pro-life information. Again, this is not an opinion or a conspiracy theory, Project Veritas obtained first hand information proving the intentional censorship by Big Tech.
And the Coronavirus has just made things worse. You see, scared people are more easily manipulated into giving up their freedom of speech. Children are being kept from going to school, tens of millions of Americans are out of work, and rioting has broken out in most major American cities.
Now, more than ever, freedom of speech is necessary to secure all of our freedoms. Freedom of speech is crucial to truly exercise the freedom to vote for the person that best represents one's own views, or the freedom to decide what course of medical treatment to accept - especially the decision to control what vaccines are administered to our children.
Some experts, like Dr. Robert Epstein, a behavioral psychologist who has testified before congress against Big Tech believes that we may already be too late to control Big Tech's tyrannical control over information.
President Trump took a step in the right direction with his Executive Order calling for increased regulation of Big Tech. But much more can be done and needs to be done right now.
In an era where almost everything is polarized, there is an overwhelming support for breaking up the Big Tech monopolies. A recent Pew poll found that 75% of Americans believe that Big Tech companies have too much influence.
It is time to bring serious accountability to Big Tech for their attempts to use their monopolies to kill free speech.
It is time to break up Big Tech.
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Google, Facebook, Twitter shut down ‘frontline’ US doctors who promote ‘cure for COVID’ - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/google-facebook-twitter-shut-down-frontline-us-doctors-who-promote-cure-for-covid?utm_source=featured&utm_campaign=standard
Americans overwhelmingly agree Big Tech has too much power: Pew poll - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/americans-overwhelmingly-agree-big-tech-has-too-much-power-pew-poll
Leaked Google employee's email reveals effort to boost Latino vote, surprise that some voted for Trump - https://www.foxnews.com/tech/leaked-google-employees-email-reveals-effort-to-boost-latino-vote-surprise-that-some-voted-for-trump
Undercover video proves Google interfered in Irish abortion referendum - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/americans-overwhelmingly-agree-big-tech-has-too-much-power-pew-poll


lifesitenews--2020-12-16--Americans should accept COVID shutdowns until at least summer 2021, Bill Gates says

December 16 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) – Americans should be prepared to accept not returning to restaurants until well into the new year , software giant and left-wing philanthropist Bill Gates claimed over the weekend .
“ Bars and restaurants—in most of the country—will be closed as we go into this wave , and I think , sadly , that ’ s appropriate , ” the Microsoft founder claimed Sunday in an interview with CNN .
He predicted Americans might regain a semblance of normalcy around summer 2021 , “ but even through early 2022 , unless we help @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and we get high vaccination rates in our country , the risk of reintroduction will be there and , of course , the global economy will be slowed down , which hurts America economically in a pretty dramatic way.
” That isn ’ t sitting well with many Americans affected by COVID-19 lockdowns , who note that the billionaire Gates ( who enjoys media status as an authority on the virus despite having no medical expertise ) need not worry about being personally affected by government ordering his source of livelihood to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the National Restaurant Association puts the number of restaurants closed by the pandemic response at more than 100,000 , with 10,000 just in the last three months .
87 % of full-service restaurants report experiencing a 36 % drop in sales , with majorities expecting things to get worse over the winter , including forced layoffs and furloughs of workers .
In Florida , Republican Gov .
Ron DeSantis ( whose name has been floated as a potential 2024 presidential candidate ) has made a point of modeling the opposite approach .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been done has restaurants very low in terms of where these infections can be traced to , ” DeSantis , who has largely resisted calls to lock down the state , said Tuesday at a press conference .
“ The vast , vast majority [ of coronavirus cases ] are occurring in people 's homes , particularly if you have people getting together.
” “ Some may want to shut you down , we want to pull you up , ” the governor told restaurant owners .
“ We 've got your back @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a waitress or a cook or you [ have ] a family-owned business .
You are an important part of our state.
” LifeSiteNews is facing increasing censorship .
Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video library .

'Bars and restaurants—in most of the country—will be closed as we go into this wave, and I think, sadly, that’s appropriate,' the Microsoft founder claimed Sunday in an interview with CNN.
December 16, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – Americans should be prepared to accept not returning to restaurants until well into the new year, software giant and left-wing philanthropist Bill Gates claimed over the weekend.
“Bars and restaurants—in most of the country—will be closed as we go into this wave, and I think, sadly, that’s appropriate,” the Microsoft founder claimed Sunday in an interview with CNN. He predicted Americans might regain a semblance of normalcy around summer 2021, “but even through early 2022, unless we help other countries get rid of this disease, and we get high vaccination rates in our country, the risk of reintroduction will be there and, of course, the global economy will be slowed down, which hurts America economically in a pretty dramatic way.”
.@BillGates on Covid: “Even through 2022” we should be prepared for life to not return to “normal” Says “sadly” it’s “appropriate” for bars and restaurants to close over the next “four to six months” pic.twitter.com/cmDD8pv3XR — Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) December 13, 2020
That isn’t sitting well with many Americans affected by COVID-19 lockdowns, who note that the billionaire Gates (who enjoys media status as an authority on the virus despite having no medical expertise) need not worry about being personally affected by government ordering his source of livelihood to shut down.
Fox Business notes that the National Restaurant Association puts the number of restaurants closed by the pandemic response at more than 100,000, with 10,000 just in the last three months. 87% of full-service restaurants report experiencing a 36% drop in sales, with majorities expecting things to get worse over the winter, including forced layoffs and furloughs of workers.
In Florida, Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis (whose name has been floated as a potential 2024 presidential candidate) has made a point of modeling the opposite approach.
“Most of the contact tracing that's been done has restaurants very low in terms of where these infections can be traced to,” DeSantis, who has largely resisted calls to lock down the state, said Tuesday at a press conference. “The vast, vast majority [of coronavirus cases] are occurring in people's homes, particularly if you have people getting together.”
“Some may want to shut you down, we want to pull you up,” the governor told restaurant owners. “We've got your back, if you're somebody who's a waitress or a cook or you [have] a family-owned business. You are an important part of our state.”
— Article continues below Petition — PETITION: No to government and corporate penalties for refusing COVID-19 vaccine Show Petition Text 103183 have signed the petition. Let's get to 125000 ! Thank you for signing this petition! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Country... State... Sign this Petition **Photo credit: Shutterstock.com Mainstream media sources are promoting offensive suggestions by some doctors that people who refuse a vaccine for COVID-19 should be "punished" by the government and by business - effectively coercing them into taking the vaccine. One group of doctors writing in 'USA Today' suggested that the government impose special taxes (i.e., fines) on people who refuse the vaccination and that business simply refuse to serve them. [see story below]
Another doctor writing in an online publication called 'The Conversation' shamelessly suggested that people who refuse a vaccine should be given a psychoactive drug to induce compliance. [see story below] But, these suggestions are plain political posturing, and have nothing to do with science or with the recent trends of the disease. And, in case they haven't noticed, we live in a democracy not a medical dictatorship! Please SIGN this urgent petition which asks policy-makers and business people, at all levels, to pledge to respect the rights of those who, in good conscience, decide not to vaccinate themselves or their children. People should not have to live in fear of governmental or corporate retribution for refusing a vaccine which is being rushed to market by Big Pharma and their fellow-travelers in NGOs, like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. It would be intolerable and immoral for the government or business to coerce someone, and their family, to take a COVID vaccine against their will to avoid a fine, or just so they can do their weekly grocery shopping. Medical freedom must be respected in principle and also in practice. So, it is now time that our policy-makers listen to all voices involved in this vital conversation, and start to represent those who will not tolerate being punished for refusing a vaccine. Simply put, legislatures must begin to act as legislatures again. Questions must be asked. Hearings and investigations must be held. And, the legislatures of each state and country must return to the business of representing the people who voted for them, assuming their rightful place as the originator of legislation. We can no longer accept the dictates of executive branches without question, especially now that, statistically speaking, the initial brunt of the COVID crisis has passed. Neither can we accept the dictates of doctors who seem detached from reality and from science, and who only seem to be attached to the idea of promoting ideas which contribute to the agrandizement of power and control of political interests, and wealth of those who stand to make a lot of money from the sale of a COVID vaccine. Please SIGN this urgent petition which asks government and business leaders to pledge to respect the rights of those who refuse a COVID vaccine, and not seek to punish them for doing so. FOR MORE INFORMATION: 'Doctors lay out plan to ‘punish’ people who refuse coronavirus vaccine: ‘There is no alternative’' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/doctors-lay-out-plan-to-punish-people-who-refuse-coronavirus-vaccine-there-is-no-alternative 'US professor: ‘Psychoactive pill’ should be covertly administered to ensure lockdown compliance' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-professor-ensure-lockdown-compliance-by-drugging-dissenters-with-psychoactive-pill Hide Petition Text Sign this Petition
LifeSiteNews is facing increasing censorship. Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video library.
Share


lifesitenews--2020-12-16--The COVID-19 vaccine requires careful vetting

December 16 , 2020 ( American Thinker ) — The currently reported COVID-19 `` surge '' arrived just in time for many to use it as an excuse for emergency authorization of vaccines .
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) recently issued an emergency use authorization for a COVID-19 vaccine in the United States .
( An important point that can not be elaborated in this article is that `` emergency use authorization '' is very different from , and much more dangerous than , the normal FDA approval process ) .
The U.S. Centers for Disease @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recommended that millions of doses of the vaccine be given to health care professionals first .
Health care professionals and Americans in general need to know what follows .
Numerous previous articles described the dishonesty of public health officials , including the CDC , regarding the definition of `` COVID-19 death '' and COVID-19 data in general .
It was mentioned that if misleading language was used to describe COVID-19 death data , then one may reasonably question whether public health officials and influential collaborators in the pharmaceutical industry would be misleading when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ data .
It appears as though such misleading language is being used to describe the safety and the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine recently authorized for emergency use in the U.S. Other commentaries have discussed the dangers of COVID-19 vaccines and the fact that a COVID-19 vaccine may be unnecessary ; this article will not go completely into specifics on the topic .
Generally speaking , it would be an outright lie or negligent for public health officials or pharmaceutical representatives to say that the long-acting COVID-19 vaccine is `` safe '' if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ humans ( or non-humans for that matter ) for more than two months .
If one pays close attention to the wording used by public health and pharmaceutical officials , one will observe some cunning language .
Such persons may state something like `` no safety concerns '' have been discovered yet with the COVID-19 vaccine .
This may make the average American think public health officials and vaccine-makers are claiming that the vaccine is `` safe '' ; that would not be true .
Such a statement can not possibly be made @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the long-acting substance are unknown .
Notably , serious adverse events have indeed been reported with the COVID-19 vaccine ( page 41 ) .
With emergency use authorization , the COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial may quickly become one of the largest human guinea pig trials in the history of the world with many people likely thinking it has been shown to be safe .
It has not .
Typically , animals — including guinea pigs — are used to test the safety of substances with long-acting effects on the human body .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on animals to determine immune response , not safety .
Safety results from animal studies were either kept quiet or not conducted .
In this case , human beings become the guinea pigs .
The statement that the COVID-19 vaccine is `` 95 % effective '' is also misleading .
When one hears the statement that a clinical trial concluded that a COVID-19 vaccine is `` 95 % effective , '' one may think every person who received the COVID-19 vaccine was exposed to SARS-CoV-2 and then 95 % of those persons did @ @ @ @ @ @ @ That is not what is meant when ( whether wittingly or unwittingly ) public health and pharmaceutical officials misleadingly state that the vaccine is `` 95 % effective '' or has `` 95 % efficacy . ''
The COVID-19 vaccine is undergoing a clinical trial in which it is apparently not known ( or at least not published ) how many clinical trial participants have been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 .
The clinical trial is being conducted in the U.S. , Turkey , South Africa , Argentina , and Germany and is a conventional @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and then waits ... to see if they get infected anyway while they go about their normal lives . ''
( The remainder of the previously quoted article is not endorsed . )
One may notice a significant problem : a person could have received two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine and then `` go about his life '' by being locked down in his house with little or no interaction with others for a significant amount of time .
If such a person did not eventually experience symptoms of COVID-19 , then @ @ @ @ @ @ @ highly effective '' in that person ( page 46 ) .
That is not all .
The COVID-19 vaccine authorized for emergency use requires two doses .
And the clinical trial that claims that the vaccine is `` 95 % effective '' may have included some participants in the `` 95 % efficacy '' data only seven days after receiving the second dose of the vaccine ( pages 13-32 , 46 ) .
The FDA summarizes its conclusions on the COVID-19 vaccine in this way : The protocol-specified 2-dose vaccination regimen was highly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ least 7 days after completion of the vaccination regimen .
( page 46 ) It is an absurd conclusion ; it is not science .
If a clinical trial participant received the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine , was locked down in his home for seven days without any human interactions , was never exposed to SARS-CoV-2 , and then did not experience symptoms of COVID-19 after seven days , it appears as though the pharmaceutical company and the FDA would include that participant in the category in which the vaccine was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ '' .
Indeed , the language used to describe the `` safety and efficacy '' of the recently authorized COVID-19 vaccine is misleading .
One may consider the following questions : if those involved with the authorization of the COVID-19 vaccine in the pharmaceutical industry , FDA , CDC , the Department of Health and Human Services ( HHS ) , etc.
, could be held liable and either sued or punished in other ways for damages that show up after two months , would they authorize it so quickly ?
Or , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the FDA , and other public health officials use such misleading language to describe COVID-19 data in general and the safety and efficacy of the recently authorized COVID-19 vaccine , can they , and the COVID-19 vaccine they authorize , really be trusted ?
Published with permission from the American Thinker .
LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page .
View it here .

The language used to describe the 'safety and efficacy' of the recently authorized COVID-19 vaccine is misleading.
December 16, 2020 (American Thinker) — The currently reported COVID-19 “surge” arrived just in time for many to use it as an excuse for emergency authorization of vaccines. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently issued an emergency use authorization for a COVID-19 vaccine in the United States. (An important point that cannot be elaborated in this article is that “emergency use authorization” is very different from, and much more dangerous than, the normal FDA approval process). The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recommended that millions of doses of the vaccine be given to health care professionals first. Health care professionals and Americans in general need to know what follows.
Numerous previous articles described the dishonesty of public health officials, including the CDC, regarding the definition of “COVID-19 death” and COVID-19 data in general. It was mentioned that if misleading language was used to describe COVID-19 death data, then one may reasonably question whether public health officials and influential collaborators in the pharmaceutical industry would be misleading when describing future COVID-19 vaccine safety and efficacy data. It appears as though such misleading language is being used to describe the safety and the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine recently authorized for emergency use in the U.S.
Other commentaries have discussed the dangers of COVID-19 vaccines and the fact that a COVID-19 vaccine may be unnecessary; this article will not go completely into specifics on the topic. Generally speaking, it would be an outright lie or negligent for public health officials or pharmaceutical representatives to say that the long-acting COVID-19 vaccine is “safe” if the vaccine has not been studied in humans (or non-humans for that matter) for more than two months.
— Article continues below Petition — SIGN: Join petition calling for a stop to COVID vaccine testing in Europe Show Petition Text 16601 have signed the petition. Let's get to 17500 ! Thank you for signing this petition! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Country... State... Sign this Petition Concerns over the health and safety of the human test subjects in Pfizer's European COVID vaccine study have caused two eminent doctors to launch a petition calling for an immediate halt to those studies. On December 1, 2020, Dr. Michael Yeadon, an ex chief of research at Pfizer and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a lung specialist and former department head of public health lodged an appeal to the EMA, the European Medicine Agency responsible for approving drugs across the EU, asking them to suspend the ongoing Pfizer/BioNtech COVID vaccine study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42). LifeSite is joining Drs. Yeadon and Wodarg in their call for an immediate suspension of this study and we are encouraging people to co-sign their petition to the EMA which is to be found in the petition section on this page. Please SIGN and SHARE this important petition, and then please contact the EMA at the address listed below, in the 'For More Information' section. In their application to the EMA, Drs. Yeadon and Wodarg give the following reasons why the Pfizer study could pose dangers to the health and safety of the study participants: First, the doctors say that the study design must be improved as the highly inaccurate PCR test is currently being used to detect the presence of COVID in the study participants. This means that the efficacy of the vaccine is in doubt. The doctors recommend changing from the PCR test to Sanger sequencing.
Second, and more important, the doctors advocate animal testing of the vaccine to exclude the possibility of the risks to the life and health of human participants from known side-effects of other similar studies on corona viruses. These side-effects can include: an exaggerated immune response when the subject comes into contact with the "real world" virus; possible infertility of an "indefinite duration" for women; severe allergic responses to polyethylene glycol which is contained in the mRNA vaccine being tested by Pfizer; and, other latent, serious side effects which, because of the short duration of the study, may only become known well after the conclusion of the study. Because of these unacceptable risks to the life and health of the Pfizer/BioNtech COVID vaccine study participants, we are joining with Drs. Yeadon and Wodarg as co-signers of their petition to the European Medicine Agency, asking for an immediate halt to these studies. Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING, today! And, after you have signed this petition, please send the sample email in the section below to the official European Medicine Agency email: [email protected] FOR MORE INFORMATION: Actual Petition Text (pdf): https://2020news.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Wodarg_Yeadon_EMA_Petition_Pfizer_Trial_FINAL_01DEC2020_EN_unsigned_with_Exhibits.pdf Sample Email: Subject: Please act on the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon and stay the Phase III clinical trial(s) of BNT162b Dear Sir or Madam, I am hereby co-signing the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon to support their urgent request to stay the Phase III clinical trial(s) of BNT162b (EudraCT Number 2020-002641-42) and other clinical trials. The full text of the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon can be found here: https://2020news.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Wodarg_Yeadon_EMA_Petition_Pfizer_Trial_FINAL_01DEC2020_EN_unsigned_with_Exhibits.pdf I hereby respectfully request that EMA act on the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon immediately. Regards, [Your name] **Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com Hide Petition Text Sign this Petition
If one pays close attention to the wording used by public health and pharmaceutical officials, one will observe some cunning language. Such persons may state something like “no safety concerns” have been discovered yet with the COVID-19 vaccine. This may make the average American think public health officials and vaccine-makers are claiming that the vaccine is “safe”; that would not be true. Such a statement cannot possibly be made because, again, long-term dangers of the long-acting substance are unknown. Notably, serious adverse events have indeed been reported with the COVID-19 vaccine (page 41).
With emergency use authorization, the COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial may quickly become one of the largest human guinea pig trials in the history of the world with many people likely thinking it has been shown to be safe. It has not. Typically, animals — including guinea pigs — are used to test the safety of substances with long-acting effects on the human body. The recently authorized COVID-19 vaccine was apparently tested on animals to determine immune response, not safety. Safety results from animal studies were either kept quiet or not conducted. In this case, human beings become the guinea pigs.
The statement that the COVID-19 vaccine is “95% effective” is also misleading. When one hears the statement that a clinical trial concluded that a COVID-19 vaccine is “95% effective,” one may think every person who received the COVID-19 vaccine was exposed to SARS-CoV-2 and then 95% of those persons did not test positive or experience symptoms. That is not what is meant when (whether wittingly or unwittingly) public health and pharmaceutical officials misleadingly state that the vaccine is “95% effective” or has “95% efficacy.”
The COVID-19 vaccine is undergoing a clinical trial in which it is apparently not known (or at least not published) how many clinical trial participants have been exposed to SARS-CoV-2. The clinical trial is being conducted in the U.S., Turkey, South Africa, Argentina, and Germany and is a conventional clinical trial, which “vaccinates people and then waits … to see if they get infected anyway while they go about their normal lives.” (The remainder of the previously quoted article is not endorsed.)
One may notice a significant problem: a person could have received two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine and then “go about his life” by being locked down in his house with little or no interaction with others for a significant amount of time. If such a person did not eventually experience symptoms of COVID-19, then the vaccine would apparently be considered “highly effective” in that person (page 46).
That is not all. The COVID-19 vaccine authorized for emergency use requires two doses. And the clinical trial that claims that the vaccine is “95% effective” may have included some participants in the “95% efficacy” data only seven days after receiving the second dose of the vaccine (pages 13-32, 46). The FDA summarizes its conclusions on the COVID-19 vaccine in this way:
The protocol-specified 2-dose vaccination regimen was highly effective in preventing PCR-confirmed COVID-19 occurring at least 7 days after completion of the vaccination regimen. (page 46)
It is an absurd conclusion; it is not science. If a clinical trial participant received the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, was locked down in his home for seven days without any human interactions, was never exposed to SARS-CoV-2, and then did not experience symptoms of COVID-19 after seven days, it appears as though the pharmaceutical company and the FDA would include that participant in the category in which the vaccine was said to have been “highly effective”.
Indeed, the language used to describe the “safety and efficacy” of the recently authorized COVID-19 vaccine is misleading.
One may consider the following questions: if those involved with the authorization of the COVID-19 vaccine in the pharmaceutical industry, FDA, CDC, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), etc., could be held liable and either sued or punished in other ways for damages that show up after two months, would they authorize it so quickly?
Or, if the pharmaceutical industry, the CDC, the FDA, and other public health officials use such misleading language to describe COVID-19 data in general and the safety and efficacy of the recently authorized COVID-19 vaccine, can they, and the COVID-19 vaccine they authorize, really be trusted?
Published with permission from the American Thinker.
LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here.
Share


lifesitenews--2020-12-16--Exposing the fraud and evil in the FBI

Exposing the fraud and evil in the FBI

LifeSiteNews is facing increasing censorship .
Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video library .
December 16 , 2020 ( American Thinker ) — The first of last week 's two biggest stories was Friday evening ’ s action by the Supreme Court refusing to hear the lawsuit brought by Texas and other states respecting the evident fraud in the balloting in Wisconsin , Pennsylvania , Georgia , and Michigan .
I expressed my views on this yesterday here : ' A Republic , If You Can Keep It ' | The Pipeline @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Court had decided to take it , it would not have decided who won these states .
Instead , had it decided that the electors from those states were chosen illegally , it would have remanded the complaints to the legislatures of these states , which have the responsibility to fashion a remedy .
In any event , had they decided to throw out the electoral votes of those states , Biden would still have one more electoral vote than President Trump , as the majority is determined by the number of electoral @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now up to the state legislatures and Congress to decide what to do with the votes from the states in question and the Texas filing provides an excellent template for deciding the votes from those and other states where fraud was rampant — either pick a different slate of electors or provide no slate from those states .
If the state legislatures fail in their responsibilities , at the demand of one congressman and one senator , any electoral slate can be challenged and the outcome of the challenge is determined by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a system in which the Republicans have the most delegations and , therefore , the most votes .
The second most significant matter , in my view , was the clear gaslighting the media and former intelligence officials carried out on the Hunter Biden story , hiding the fact that he ’ s been under criminal investigation since 2018 for bribery , tax evasion , and money laundering from , among other sources , China .
Drew Holden and Arthur Schwartz rounded up the evidence of this gaslighting .
That it was effective @ @ @ @ @ @ @ relevant information about Chinese bribery of the Biden family and their consummate corruption in time to affect the election is clear .
One survey reports that nearly 10 % of those who voted for Biden in key states would not have , had they known about this scandal which the major media deeply hid from them .
All the fact-free media claims that the Biden corruption was “ Russian disinformation ” served only to bury the truth that these and other government figures were captives of the Chinese government , a government of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ own people .
Interestingly , the press that swatted away the report in the NY Post about Hunter as “ Russian Disinformation ” were the very same people who on zero evidence accused President Trump of Russian collusion for 3 1/2 years .
Just as interesting were the 50 former intelligence officers , including John Brennan and James Clapper , who had not been briefed about Hunter Biden , but all the same claimed that the story about his corruption had all the characteristics of “ Russian disinformation.
” Hunter and Joe Biden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Chinese stooges this week .
Congressman Eric Swalwell was as well when the story broke that he had been too close — how close he hasn ’ t denied — to a Chinese honeypot spy while he sat on the House Intelligence Committee , recipients of the most secret of our intelligence gathering .
Even more damning is that Speaker Nancy Pelosi put Swalwell in that position after the FBI notified her that he had been compromised .
Congressman Adam Schiff , chair of that committee , was also informed and it didn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ peddled lies about Trump and Russia for years and bottled up evidence that the claims were baseless .
Just as the agency stoked and never rebutted the claims of Russian collusion against Trump , which it knew at the very outset were false , they did nothing to deal with Swalwell ’ s having been compromised .
Indeed , the FBI has a great deal to answer for and in a better world would be stripped of its counterintelligence functions and more .
Don Surber has dubbed the agency “ The KGB for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ solid point .
It has , as he notes , been in recent years covering up for Democrats and besetting those that the Democrats don ’ t like .
It ’ s hard to take issue with his examples : The FBI actually aids and abets crime .
Its investigation of Hillary 's sale of state secrets through 33,000 private emails focused not on prosecuting her , but on destroying all evidence of her crimes , including the computer she used .
[ snip ] Then there is Seth Rich , the man @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and sent to Wikileaks a thumb drive of incriminating emails .
Everyone in DC knows he was murdered .
No one is investigating .
Ty Clevenger represents Brian Huddleston in a lawsuit against the FBI .
He can not get the bureau to turn over records .
His FOIA lawsuit did get an admission from the bureau .
`` After three years of claiming that it could not find any records about murdered Democratic National Committee employee Seth Rich , the FBI admitted today that it has thousands of pages of information about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ custody of his laptop . ''
[ snip ] The FBI does not work for the American people .
If it did , it would have told Obama to pound salt when he demanded the FBI spy on Donald John Trump .
Instead it lied to federal judges and spied .
Four years later , only one poor soul has been prosecuted .
No other prosecution is expected .
Then there is Hunter Biden 's laptop filled with details of corruption , bribes , and sex with underage women in Red China .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ year .
The good citizen who turned it in lost his business and is now in hiding .
The corrupt agency is now involved in a wide-ranging investigation conducted by the Office of the Inspector General of sexual misconduct .
At week ’ s end Senator Ted Cruz wrote to FBI Director Christopher Wray and Attorney General William Barr , noting that under oath former director James Comey and former deputy director Andrew McCabe ‘ s testimony about their knowledge and approval of the 2016 Clinton media leak is at odds , that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a federal crime .
He wants an investigation to determine which one is the liar .
With all this going on , it ’ s no surprise that disinfectants are in such demand and they are hard to find in the market .
Published with permission from the American Thinker .

LifeSiteNews is facing increasing censorship. Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video library.
December 16, 2020 (American Thinker) — The first of last week's two biggest stories was Friday evening’s action by the Supreme Court refusing to hear the lawsuit brought by Texas and other states respecting the evident fraud in the balloting in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Michigan. I expressed my views on this yesterday here: 'A Republic, If You Can Keep It' | The Pipeline
In short, I believe if the Court had decided to take it, it would not have decided who won these states. Instead, had it decided that the electors from those states were chosen illegally, it would have remanded the complaints to the legislatures of these states, which have the responsibility to fashion a remedy. In any event, had they decided to throw out the electoral votes of those states, Biden would still have one more electoral vote than President Trump, as the majority is determined by the number of electoral votes actually cast. It’s now up to the state legislatures and Congress to decide what to do with the votes from the states in question and the Texas filing provides an excellent template for deciding the votes from those and other states where fraud was rampant — either pick a different slate of electors or provide no slate from those states. If the state legislatures fail in their responsibilities, at the demand of one congressman and one senator, any electoral slate can be challenged and the outcome of the challenge is determined by the House of Representatives voting by delegation, a system in which the Republicans have the most delegations and, therefore, the most votes.
The second most significant matter, in my view, was the clear gaslighting the media and former intelligence officials carried out on the Hunter Biden story, hiding the fact that he’s been under criminal investigation since 2018 for bribery, tax evasion, and money laundering from, among other sources, China. Drew Holden and Arthur Schwartz rounded up the evidence of this gaslighting. That it was effective in its bad faith effort at keeping relevant information about Chinese bribery of the Biden family and their consummate corruption in time to affect the election is clear. One survey reports that nearly 10% of those who voted for Biden in key states would not have, had they known about this scandal which the major media deeply hid from them.
Knowing about the scandals involving Biden’s son Hunter’s dealings with officials and firms in China, Ukraine and Russia would have prompted 9.4 percent of those surveyed to change their vote, according to the survey of 1,750 Biden voters in Nevada, Georgia, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Michigan.
All the fact-free media claims that the Biden corruption was “Russian disinformation” served only to bury the truth that these and other government figures were captives of the Chinese government, a government of ruthless ambitions against both us and their own people. Interestingly, the press that swatted away the report in the NY Post about Hunter as “Russian Disinformation” were the very same people who on zero evidence accused President Trump of Russian collusion for 3 1/2 years.
Just as interesting were the 50 former intelligence officers, including John Brennan and James Clapper, who had not been briefed about Hunter Biden, but all the same claimed that the story about his corruption had all the characteristics of “Russian disinformation.”
Hunter and Joe Biden were not the only people unmasked as Chinese stooges this week. Congressman Eric Swalwell was as well when the story broke that he had been too close — how close he hasn’t denied — to a Chinese honeypot spy while he sat on the House Intelligence Committee, recipients of the most secret of our intelligence gathering. Even more damning is that Speaker Nancy Pelosi put Swalwell in that position after the FBI notified her that he had been compromised. Congressman Adam Schiff, chair of that committee, was also informed and it didn’t bother him. Instead he peddled lies about Trump and Russia for years and bottled up evidence that the claims were baseless. Just as the agency stoked and never rebutted the claims of Russian collusion against Trump, which it knew at the very outset were false, they did nothing to deal with Swalwell’s having been compromised.
Tammy Bruce nailed it:
Now clear: FBI *knew* Rep. Swalwell was compromised via a Chinese spy, yet spent the last 4 years pushing an accusation against @realDonaldTrump they KNEW was false & helped perpetuate. But don't worry, our system would totally not compromise the election. — Tammy Bruce (@HeyTammyBruce) December 8, 2020
Indeed, the FBI has a great deal to answer for and in a better world would be stripped of its counterintelligence functions and more.
Don Surber has dubbed the agency “The KGB for Democrats,” and he has a solid point. It has, as he notes, been in recent years covering up for Democrats and besetting those that the Democrats don’t like. It’s hard to take issue with his examples:
The FBI actually aids and abets crime. Its investigation of Hillary's sale of state secrets through 33,000 private emails focused not on prosecuting her, but on destroying all evidence of her crimes, including the computer she used. [snip] Then there is Seth Rich, the man who blew the whistle on the DNC and sent to Wikileaks a thumb drive of incriminating emails. Everyone in DC knows he was murdered. No one is investigating. Ty Clevenger represents Brian Huddleston in a lawsuit against the FBI. He cannot get the bureau to turn over records. His FOIA lawsuit did get an admission from the bureau. Clevenger wrote: “After three years of claiming that it could not find any records about murdered Democratic National Committee employee Seth Rich, the FBI admitted today that it has thousands of pages of information about him, further admitting that it has custody of his laptop.” [snip]
The FBI does not work for the American people. If it did, it would have told Obama to pound salt when he demanded the FBI spy on Donald John Trump. Instead it lied to federal judges and spied.
Four years later, only one poor soul has been prosecuted. No other prosecution is expected.
Then there is Hunter Biden's laptop filled with details of corruption, bribes, and sex with underage women in Red China.
It sat on that laptop for a year. The good citizen who turned it in lost his business and is now in hiding.
The corrupt agency is now involved in a wide-ranging investigation conducted by the Office of the Inspector General of sexual misconduct.
At week’s end Senator Ted Cruz wrote to FBI Director Christopher Wray and Attorney General William Barr, noting that under oath former director James Comey and former deputy director Andrew McCabe‘s testimony about their knowledge and approval of the 2016 Clinton media leak is at odds, that one of them lied under oath, a federal crime. He wants an investigation to determine which one is the liar.
Lying partisans from top to bottom.
With all this going on, it’s no surprise that disinfectants are in such demand and they are hard to find in the market.
Published with permission from the American Thinker.
Share