lifesitenews--2020-12-10--Bp. Strickland, Gen. Flynn, Abby Johnson to address major prayer rally in DC Saturday

WASHINGTON , D.C. , December 10 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) – Planned Parenthood director turned pro-life advocate Abby Johnson , General Michael Flynn , Bishop Joseph Strickland , and the Catholic nun whose pro-life RNC speech went viral are all slated to speak at Saturday ’ s “ Let the Church ROAR !
” prayer rally in Washington , D.C .
The event is a collaboration between the Jericho March and Stop the Steal and is expected to convene tens of thousands to pray for election integrity on the National Mall .
The Jericho March and Stop the Steal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Remote speakers include Bishop Strickland of Tyler , Texas , Catholic author and YouTuber Dr. Taylor Marshall , and Sr. Dede Byrne , the nun who made headlines for her speech at the RNC in support of President Donald Trump .
Popular author and prominent evangelical Eric Metaxas will emcee the event .
Abby Johnson , General Flynn , multiple Catholic priests , and politicians from Georgia and Arizona will speak in person .
Mike Lindell of “ My Pillow ” fame will also speak .
Ahead of “ Let the Church @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will take place from 9:30-10:45 AM simultaneously around the U.S. Capitol , Supreme Court , and Department of Justice , ” the Jericho March website explains .
Participants will “ march around the buildings seven times and pray for the walls of corruption and election fraud to fall down , just as Joshua and the Israelites walked around the walls of corrupt Jericho.
” “ Since November 5th , Jericho Marchers have been fasting , praying , and marching daily around their state capitols for election integrity , ” the Jericho March said @ @ @ @ @ @ @ authentic and diverse Judeo-Christian forms of worship , ” features rosary recitations and Eucharistic processions .
Similar “ ROAR !
” marches scheduled on Saturday in the state capitals of contested swing states , including Arizona , Georgia , Michigan , Nevada , Pennsylvania , and Wisconsin .
Registration for the state rallies can be found here .
“ Prior to his speech at the National Mall Prayer Rally , Lt. Gen. Flynn will first speak at 10 AM at the Supreme Court , an event hosted by Alice Butler-Short of Virginia Women @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Women for Trump , and other affiliates with the ‘ One Nation Under God ’ grassroots rally , ” the Jericho March announced .
“ This will be Lt. Gen. Flynn ’ s first public appearance since he has been pardoned by President Trump and the case dismissed.
” A Catholic apostolate called Signs and Wonders for Our Times has said it will have a presence at the D.C. prayer rally .
Signs and Wonders will march with the Missionary Image of Our Lady of Guadalupe , in honor of Saturday ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ asking Christians to take part in their Project Nineveh program of “ intense prayer.
” Project Nineveh consists of praying Psalm 51 three times with outstretched arms , as with the Hour of Grace for the Feast of the Immaculate Conception , in addition to fasting and an hour of silence .
“ We give Satan the Twin Barrels honoring both days , ” Signs and Wonders said .
“ Stop the Lying ” is another event on Saturday organized by Kevin Whitt .
Protestors will be marching on CNN headquarters to protest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ election fraud .
Project Veritas recently released recordings of CNN leadership admitting that they determined post-election coverage based on the wishes of pro-Biden politicians .
Registration and logistical information for the National Jericho March event can be found here .
Organizers have urged participants to avoid conflict with violent leftists by avoiding the city ’ s “ no-go zones ” that are known staging areas for Antifa and Black Lives Matter agitators .

WASHINGTON, D.C., December 10, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – Planned Parenthood director turned pro-life advocate Abby Johnson, General Michael Flynn, Bishop Joseph Strickland, and the Catholic nun whose pro-life RNC speech went viral are all slated to speak at Saturday’s “Let the Church ROAR!” prayer rally in Washington, D.C.
The event is a collaboration between the Jericho March and Stop the Steal and is expected to convene tens of thousands to pray for election integrity on the National Mall. The Jericho March and Stop the Steal are supported by the Phyllis Schlafly Eagles.
Remote speakers include Bishop Strickland of Tyler, Texas, Catholic author and YouTuber Dr. Taylor Marshall, and Sr. Dede Byrne, the nun who made headlines for her speech at the RNC in support of President Donald Trump.
Popular author and prominent evangelical Eric Metaxas will emcee the event. Abby Johnson, General Flynn, multiple Catholic priests, and politicians from Georgia and Arizona will speak in person.
Mike Lindell of “My Pillow” fame will also speak.
Ahead of “Let the Church ROAR!,” “Jericho Marches will take place from 9:30-10:45 AM simultaneously around the U.S. Capitol, Supreme Court, and Department of Justice,” the Jericho March website explains. Participants will “march around the buildings seven times and pray for the walls of corruption and election fraud to fall down, just as Joshua and the Israelites walked around the walls of corrupt Jericho.”
“Since November 5th, Jericho Marchers have been fasting, praying, and marching daily around their state capitols for election integrity,” the Jericho March said. The movement, which highlights “authentic and diverse Judeo-Christian forms of worship,” features rosary recitations and Eucharistic processions.
Similar “ROAR!” marches scheduled on Saturday in the state capitals of contested swing states, including Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Registration for the state rallies can be found here.
“Prior to his speech at the National Mall Prayer Rally, Lt. Gen. Flynn will first speak at 10 AM at the Supreme Court, an event hosted by Alice Butler-Short of Virginia Women for Trump, Jo Reitkopp of California Women for Trump, and other affiliates with the ‘One Nation Under God’ grassroots rally,” the Jericho March announced. “This will be Lt. Gen. Flynn’s first public appearance since he has been pardoned by President Trump and the case dismissed.”
A Catholic apostolate called Signs and Wonders for Our Times has said it will have a presence at the D.C. prayer rally. Signs and Wonders will march with the Missionary Image of Our Lady of Guadalupe, in honor of Saturday’s Feast.
Signs and Wonders also is asking Christians to take part in their Project Nineveh program of “intense prayer.” Project Nineveh consists of praying Psalm 51 three times with outstretched arms, as with the Hour of Grace for the Feast of the Immaculate Conception, in addition to fasting and an hour of silence. “We give Satan the Twin Barrels honoring both days,” Signs and Wonders said.
“Stop the Lying” is another event on Saturday organized by Kevin Whitt. Protestors will be marching on CNN headquarters to protest the liberal network’s coverage of election fraud. Project Veritas recently released recordings of CNN leadership admitting that they determined post-election coverage based on the wishes of pro-Biden politicians.
Registration and logistical information for the National Jericho March event can be found here. Organizers have urged participants to avoid conflict with violent leftists by avoiding the city’s “no-go zones” that are known staging areas for Antifa and Black Lives Matter agitators.
Share


lifesitenews--2020-12-10--Law prof warns about European-style crackdown on free speech coming to US

December 9 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) — A high-profile attorney and legal scholar is sounding the alarm on the United States ’ current track to European-style anti-free speech laws .
Jonathan Turley , a law professor at George Washington University in the nation ’ s capital , called on Americans to educate the public about where this path leads , as shown by countries like France , England , and Norway .
“ Once we cross the Rubicon into speech criminalization and controls , Europe has shown that it is rarely possible to work back to liberties lost , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ moving into potentially the most anti-free speech period of American history — and possibly the most anti-free speech administration , ” Turley said .
The law professor pointed out that former Vice President Joe Biden , the likely next president , “ has called for speech controls.
” In January , Biden had criticized Facebook for refusing to remove a Trump “ attack ad ” at Biden ’ s request , calling Facebook ’ s response “ unacceptable.
” Turley also noted that Biden ’ s recently appointed transition “ Team Lead ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Richard Stengel , is “ one of the most pronounced anti-free speech figures in the United States.
” Stengel wrote what Turley described as a “ chilling ” 2019 op-ed for the Washington Post entitled , “ Why America Needs a Hate Speech Law.
” Stengel cited Quran burning and “ circulation of “ false narratives ” by Russia ” as examples of speech that should be restricted .
The views of Biden and Stengel on free speech are in keeping with what Turley calls the “ core value ” of “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ taken root in the Democratic party .
Democrats have already been successfully demanding internet censorship , which has recently become increasingly aggressive .
Turley is calling on free speech advocates to “ educate the public on where this road leads in places like Norway , ” which he says is “ an example of this headlong plunge into speech controls and crimes in the West.
” Norway has held a hate speech provision in its penal code since 1970 , and currently imposes a fine or imprisonment for up to three years to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ negligence publicly makes a discriminatory or hateful statement.
” This means “ threatening or insulting a person or promoting hate of , persecution of or contempt for another person based on his or her ” ethnicity , religion , or homosexuality .
This was recently found to be inadequate , since it did not explicitly provide for “ hate speech ” against gender-confused individuals .
The legislature added “ transgenders ” to the list of those protected by hate speech law .
The banned speech includes private , at-home conversations .
Turley cited @ @ @ @ @ @ @ speech in Europe , with France and England claiming especially outrageous crackdowns on free speech .
In France , free speech protections are all but extinguished .
In 2018 , conservative French politician Marine Le Pen was “ ordered into psychiatric evaluations ” after posting graphic images of people executed by Islamic terrorists .
Turley documented a list of other examples of anti-free speech measures in France that go back a decade or more , such as the fining of fashion designer John Galliano for public racial insults .
The situation is similar @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a fairly well-established track record of crushing free speech .
Back in 2010 , a 15-year old girl was arrested for burning the Quran and posting video footage of it to Facebook .
In 2013 , a man was arrested for making a joke about Nelson Mandela online after a local elected representative complained .
More recently , the Law Commission of England and Wales “ has disclosed plans to lower the threshold for hate crimes ” to criminalize private “ hate speech , ” according to the U.K. ’ s Christian Institute @ @ @ @ @ @ @ crime bill that has stirred up opposition from a wide cross-section of society , including Catholic Bishops , who have expressed concerns that owning a Bible could be considered possession of “ inflammatory material , ” an offense under the bill in question .
Sarah Phillimore , a family law attorney , said regarding the English proposal : “ I can not believe the government is being asked to consider surveillance of citizens in their own home .
How will the evidence of such hate crimes be collected ?
Will we have an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
”

PETITION UPDATE (12/11/2020)
Right before Thanksgiving, YouTube deleted a LifeSite video of a distinguished Canadian physician protesting the "unfounded public hysteria" over COVID-19 and accused us of spreading "medical misinformation."
Our account was suspended, and we were prohibited from posting videos on our YouTube channel for one week. And, while that may not seem like a big deal, it's a huge deal for a news organization like LifeSite.
Then, earlier this week, YouTube again suspended our account – this time for two weeks – over an episode of The Bishop Strickland Show wherein Bishop Strickland said he would not take an unethical COVID-19 vaccine.
We were able to appeal the suspension, and our request was granted.
This means that in YouTube's three-strikes-and-you're-out content-policing, idea-cleansing scheme, we are back down to one strike. But, we still face the threat of losing our account permanently.
And, we're not the only ones.
In a recent turn of events, YouTube just announced that it will remove videos alleging widespread voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election.
But, what is YouTube afraid of? The truth???
Thankfully, however, there is a one, big bright spot on the horizon: 48 states filed suit against Facebook just this week.
And, although this seems like a step in the right direction, the draconian measures which YouTube just rolled out, which are already wielded by Twitter, are an assault against free speech.
So, the fight for freedom of speech against Big Tech goes on. And, we must do everything we can to protect it!
Please SIGN and SHARE this petition today!
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-youtube-reverses-ban-on-lifesitenews?
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/youtube-bans-lifesite-over-video-of-bp-strickland-refusing-to-take-corona-vaccine
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/lifesites-channel-was-suspended-by-youtube-heres-how-you-can-still-watch-our-videos
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/youtube-starts-removing-videos-that-contain-allegations-of-mass-voter-fraud
https://tennesseestar.com/2020/12/10/facebook-sued-by-48-states-federal-trade-commission-over-allegations-of-monopolistic-practices/
________________________________________________________________________
PETITION UPDATE (11/18/2020)
Everyone thought the censorship by Big Tech corporations would decrease after the 2020 election, but the truth is that censorship is being felt just as much as it was before the election.
And, given the election outcome, perhaps Big Tech censorship now is even more consequential than it was before the election!
The two biggest social media platforms, Facebook and Twitter, and other Big Tech companies, are still censoring and suppressing stories and posts favorable to conservatives, and especially anything that has to do with election fraud.
Here are a few recent examples:
Women for America First organized the March for Trump on November 14, which was shut down by Facebook, MailChimp and Eventbrite. Despite Big Tech’s best efforts to cancel the event, the march went on and gathered a huge crowd.
Twitter has been suppressing a large number of President Trump’s Tweets. Most of his Tweets have been flagged arbitrarily with a warning stating: “This claim about election fraud is disputed."
Please READ this recent article about Big Tech's attempt to choke information conerning the recent Million MAGA March in Washington, DC: '5 things mainstream media won’t tell you about massive DC ‘Stop the Steal’ rally'
Then, please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition, which calls on the Congress, the president, and governors to defend freedom of speech as Big Tech continues their rampant censorship.
PETITION UPDATE (10/15/2020)
In a remarkable development, Republican Senators Ted Cruz and Lindsey Graham have announced that the Senate Judiciary Committee will be issuing subpoenas to Twitter's Jack Dorsey and Facebook's Mark Zuckerburg for their company's suppression of two critical expose news stories about how Hunter Biden and the Biden Family allegedly profited from business deals made because of Joe Biden's position as Vice President.
Please WATCH LifeSite's exclusive video of the announcement by Senator Ted Cruz below.
According to the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Senator Lindsey Graham, the subpoenas will be issued next Tuesday, for hearings to be held on Friday of next week.
This is a MASSIVE development, and should be welcomed by those who champion freedom of speech.
Again, this is all happening because Twitter and Facebook refuse to allow their members to share stories which would be favorable to conservatives.
Here's the timeline:
Yesterday, Twitter and Facebook suppressed a NY Post story about how Hunter Biden allegedly profited from introducing a Ukrainian businessman to his then-Vice President father, Joe Biden. The story also alleges that Vice President Biden then subsequently pressured Ukrainian authorities to fire a prosecutor who was investigating the businessman's company.
And, just this morning, Twitter suppressed another expose by the NY Post alleging that the Biden Family improperly profitted from deals made with one of the largest Chinese energy companies because of Vice President Biden's position in government.
But, right after the story broke, Senator Cruz tried to share the latest story on Twitter and was blocked. Twitter says that they are blocking the stories because they claim that the information was obtained illegally. However, Twitter showed no problem allowing illegally obtained information about President Trump's tax returns to be shared.
Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition, which calls on the Congress, the president, and governors to defend freedom of speech as Big Tech continues their rampant censorship.
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
'GOP senators decry Big Tech censorship of NY Post story exposing Biden corruption' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/gop-senators-decry-big-tech-censorship-of-ny-post-story-exposing-biden-corruption
___________________________________________________________________________
PETITION UPDATE (9/17/2020)
Big Tech is out to kill free speech. LifeSite is out to protect it!
LifeSite has been digging deep into the many claims of liberal bias and selective censorship of pro-life, pro-family, and conservative voices on social media.
And, we are now launching our new series 'Uncensored: Big Tech vs. Free Speech', which will unpack how the actions of Big Tech censors actually affect conservative and Christian organization and individuals.
Please WATCH the first video in our series featuring Brigitte Gabriel, the Founder of ACT For America, one of the nation's premier national security grassroots organizations.
Ms. Gabriel's organization, ACT For America, has been targeted by Big Tech especially in the manipulation of search results.
Big Tech “think[s] they are God and they are exercising their godly power over everybody else,” Gabriel explained. "Because in today's world, anytime you want to find out any information about somebody, what do you do? Google. You go to the internet to find out some information about them. When you research anything about somebody, the first thing that comes up [in the search results] is the Southern Poverty Law Center’s labeling of ‘hate groups.’”
“And who are the ‘hate groups’? Family Research Council is a hate group because they are pro-family. American Family Radio is a hate group…LifeSiteNews is a hate group. My organization is a hate group because we sound the alarm about terrorism and protecting our constitutional freedom. And so they try to character assassinate you. And they control the language.”
LifeSite's research shows that Facebook, Google, YouTube, Twitter, and others have become far too dangerous for democracy.
They can and do sway elections and public opinion in whatever direction they want, primarily by manipulating search results, tracking our online behavior, and by blocking truthful content from their platforms.
Today, LifeSite is starting to fight back, with facts and with stories of conservatives and Christians who are being negatively impacted by Big Tech's liberal bias.
Please continue to follow our 'Big Tech vs. Free Speech' series which aims to launch a new video each week for the next eight weeks.
And, please sign our petition demanding that Big Tech monopolies are broken up. Thank you!
__________________________________________________________________________
ORIGINAL PETITION BACKGROUND TEXT:
The outrageous erasing of the White Coat Summit from the internet is only the latest in a long series of brazen acts of censorship against conservatives and all those who support legitimate free speech.
You may agree or disagree with the efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine against the coronavirus, but everyone should agree on this point:
No Big Tech company should have the power to erase from the internet the medical opinions of licensed practicing doctors simply because they do not like what they have to say about the coronavirus or their experience treating it. Americans and other free peoples do not need leftist computer programmers deciding what the best course of medical treatment is for them.
Google/Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, Apple and their Big Tech friends want to control what you see, what you read, what you think, and ultimately, how you vote. Not only do they spend hundreds of millions of dollars on lobbying congress and buttering up big Washington DC think tanks, but now they brazenly and directly censor any content they don't want you to see.
Big Tech, like other interest groups, aggressively lobby to help their businesses thrive, but increasingly, Big Tech is using blatant internet censorship to impose its radical world view over those they consider to be "deplorables."
This must stop, but it won't unless we demand it as forcefully as legally possible. We believe that we have reached the point were Big Tech must be broken up if legitimate free speech is going to survive and continue to thrive on the internet.
Please sign our petition to demand real consequences for Big Tech's suppression of legitimate free speech.
In 2016, emails revealed by Fox News' Tucker Carlson proved that Google tried to influence the election by affecting voter turnout. Thankfully they failed. But they didn't give up. Instead, they have been preparing and testing how to manipulate information to continue to abuse their monopolistic power.
In 2018, Google/Youtube et. al. succeeded in manipulating the Irish abortion referendum by blacklisting pro-life videos, manipulating pro-life search terms and results and intentionally withholding pro-life information. Again, this is not an opinion or a conspiracy theory, Project Veritas obtained first hand information proving the intentional censorship by Big Tech.
And the Coronavirus has just made things worse. You see, scared people are more easily manipulated into giving up their freedom of speech. Children are being kept from going to school, tens of millions of Americans are out of work, and rioting has broken out in most major American cities.
Now, more than ever, freedom of speech is necessary to secure all of our freedoms. Freedom of speech is crucial to truly exercise the freedom to vote for the person that best represents one's own views, or the freedom to decide what course of medical treatment to accept - especially the decision to control what vaccines are administered to our children.
Some experts, like Dr. Robert Epstein, a behavioral psychologist who has testified before congress against Big Tech believes that we may already be too late to control Big Tech's tyrannical control over information.
President Trump took a step in the right direction with his Executive Order calling for increased regulation of Big Tech. But much more can be done and needs to be done right now.
In an era where almost everything is polarized, there is an overwhelming support for breaking up the Big Tech monopolies. A recent Pew poll found that 75% of Americans believe that Big Tech companies have too much influence.
It is time to bring serious accountability to Big Tech for their attempts to use their monopolies to kill free speech.
It is time to break up Big Tech.
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Google, Facebook, Twitter shut down ‘frontline’ US doctors who promote ‘cure for COVID’ - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/google-facebook-twitter-shut-down-frontline-us-doctors-who-promote-cure-for-covid?utm_source=featured&utm_campaign=standard
Americans overwhelmingly agree Big Tech has too much power: Pew poll - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/americans-overwhelmingly-agree-big-tech-has-too-much-power-pew-poll
Leaked Google employee's email reveals effort to boost Latino vote, surprise that some voted for Trump - https://www.foxnews.com/tech/leaked-google-employees-email-reveals-effort-to-boost-latino-vote-surprise-that-some-voted-for-trump
Undercover video proves Google interfered in Irish abortion referendum - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/americans-overwhelmingly-agree-big-tech-has-too-much-power-pew-poll


lifesitenews--2020-12-10--‘Refuse this vaccination’: Acclaimed French doctor unloads on COVID vaccine

December 10 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) — While people learned on Wednesday that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “ vaccine ” is not recommended for people with “ significant ” allergic reactions , after two “ adverse reactions , ” the French are widely rejecting future vaccinations against the illness , scheduled to start in January .
In a recent poll , 54 percent of respondents announced that they intend to receive the shot ; further surveys are confirming that half of the French population is “ against ” the COVID-19 vaccine in a context of growing suspicion regarding vaccines in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Moderna , Pfizer , and other companies have developed new shots in particular .
Many voices have been raised , not only on social media and anti-COVID-19 restrictions websites , but also in the mainstream media , with prominent anchors saying they won ’ t take a vaccine whose middle- and long-term effects are totally unknown .
Of the anti– “ sanitary dictatorship ” figureheads , Dr. Louis Fouché , an anesthetist and resuscitation specialist in one of the four major hospitals of Marseille , is one of the most vocal .
He @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been seen many tens of thousands of times , in which he offers a global “ tour ” of the dangers and flaws of the upcoming vaccine campaign in France , clearly advising all viewers not to have the shot .
Fouché is a respected doctor , who has the support of widely popular Pr .
Didier Raoult of the Marseille unit of infectious maladies — the first and most prominent French academic who recommended the hydroxychloroquine-azythromicyne-zinc treatment for COVID-19 patients in the early phase of the disease .
Fouché regularly pleads for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ end of fear and of compulsory masks , even heading a public event in Marseille last weekend to encourage all to stand up to the present wave of irrational panic .
His remarks regarding the current innovative RNA vaccines give valuable insights into the way these are supposed to work , but also the gigantic financial interests involved and the insane but clever way in which the authorities are promoting them .
COVID-19 vaccines are not and will not be compulsory in France , President Emmanuel Macron said in one of his recent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fouché shows , that may not be the end of the case .
Here are some of the highlights of Fouché ’ s remarks in his November 28 video .
Fouché first called attention to the modus operandi of the present vaccine-mongers : creating fear and hopelessness , the idea that restrictive measures are necessary , and the idea that hospitals should be protected from overload .
All of these are widely shared in the population through media propaganda .
“ They have created a ‘ yes set ’ : a hypnotic concatenation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with one that is false : the last one says that ‘ the only way out is the vaccine.
’ ” This excludes treatment , and treatment is available , ” he recalled .
Later in his talk , he quoted a French Senate report on the H1N1 vaccine fiasco in France : “ The more we increase fear , the more we increase the degree of acceptability of a vaccine in the general population.
” A vaccine , Fouché argued , is “ a therapeutic tool like any other , not a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a correct risk-benefit assessment , and this is lacking .
“ The vaccine is for people who are well and healthy .
The focus of risk must be very much on the safety side , ” he added : you shouldn ’ t take lightly the risk of making well people ill , especially when the fatality rate of COVID-19 is only 0.05 percent .
Fouché is especially wary of vaccinating children .
“ They are neither vectors nor contaminants , ” he stated , quoting a French study that found “ very @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , ” noting the so-called “ case of Contamine , ” where a COVID-positive child was known to have been in contact with 178 people , not one of whom was contaminated .
Instead , “ [ a ] dults can contaminate children ... but is that so serious ?
” he asked .
To date in France , three children have died of COVID , two of whom were known to have serious illnesses .
Another reason for rejecting the vaccine is that “ ARN viruses ” like SARS-COV-2 are particularly “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the 5th and 6th mutants in Marseille : the 4th was already very far from the 1st .
It ’ s a delusional idea to think that like with flu , we can use a strain from the Southern hemisphere after their winter to vaccinate in the North , ” said Dr Fouché .
The vaccine aims to create antibodies .
“ But these antibodies are not necessarily protective , and if they are , maybe not for long .
We don ’ t know , ” he pointed out .
Importantly , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sparked by vaccines “ are not protective , but facilitators.
” He gave the example of dengue fever in the Philippines , where the vaccine created by Sanofi , a French laboratory , facilitated a second episode of dengue fever that was more severe than the first in those who had already had it .
“ Dengvaxia short-circuited the first episode of benign dengue fever , as if preparing everyone who had had it to have a severe , hemorrhagic , and sometimes fatal dengue fever , ” he said .
“ There @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fully attributed .
There are ongoing lawsuits .
Sanofi was driven out of the Philippines , and the vaccine was banned.
” “ The same vaccine , oddly enough , is still authorized by the European Medicines Commission , ” said Fouché , concluding his section on the “ scientific contextualization ” by recommending a paper by Kamran Abbasi , “ Covid 19 : politicisation , corruption and suppression of science , ” published in the BMJ last November .
“ There is systemic corruption in the health system , ” he stated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t know very well if these vaccines are effective , are there side effects , and so on.
” “ There are other strategies against COVID-19 ” In a second section , Dr Fouché pointed out that the legal and legislative context shows that rules around the manufacture of a vaccine are particular : “ The procedure for making a vaccine has nothing to do with the procedure for putting a drug on the market .
A drug follows safety phases one after the other , first preclinical , then clinical , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more effective than other strategies , showing it renders a service that is important .
Otherwise , it will not be marketed , because it will not obtain a marketing authorization.
” “ Vaccines don ’ t follow that rationale .
They are not asked to compete with other strategies that would be the gold standard in an infectious disease .
This is a real problem : we ’ re to evaluate the vaccine on its own , as something that would be isolated from the rest .
But in truth , nothing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ against COVID-19 that would allow us to stop the delirium on the one hand and to stop the disease on the other hand , and they would keep the hospitals away from overload and strain.
” In the pandemic ’ s wake , vaccine development was accelerated , and safety procedures were whittled down .
This “ has gradually brought in an emergency regime into the law that is tending to normalize itself into a kind of totalitarian emergency regime that replaces the rule of law , ” warned Fouché , adding : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and we must return to democracy , the rule of law , and the normal regime of expression of the law.
” The problem lies with developers ’ absence of responsibility , Fouché explained : it is the State that bears the brunt of any costs related to undesirable side-effects , even the most serious ones .
“ These laws were passed at the American , European and then French levels , as usual , always in the same order , which means that vaccine companies do not have to worry about reimbursing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that would be related to them .
What ?
Does this mean that the people who develop these therapeutics are not responsible for their effects ?
” Fouché asked rhetorically .
“ But that ’ s not normal .
Ethically , there is something wrong .
If you are sovereign , free , and you have the right to develop a treatment , for example , you have to take responsibility for the damage ; you must take responsibility for the consequences , ” he continued .
“ We are responsible for what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time .
When you pose the risk , you must weigh it in the medium and long term , ” he added , and not make it weigh “ on you and on me through our tax money.
” “ This exit from the crisis is being developed in a context of fear and haste .
Have you done many things in your life in fear and haste that have turned out to be good things ?
There is a cardinal value in Aristotelian philosophy called phronesis , which is prudence .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ means the intelligence of courage .
You must have the contextual wisdom to see that the COVID-19 vaccine , which is being proposed to you here with plenty of marketing punchlines ; you need to see the whys and wherefores , the context and the various issues behind it that are obviously not aiming at keeping you healthy , ” said Fouché .
On the political side , he remarked : “ There is a sociological and democratic context that is worrying , since many people are standing up to explain that vaccination @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exception , that would end up with a kind of totalitarian regime induced by the fact that if you refuse vaccination , you could be given a Chinese-style social credit .
That is to say that access to civil rights , social rights , and various services would be denied you if you were not vaccinated.
” This is also of concern in France , because even if the COVID-19 vaccine is not compulsory , travel companies and others could make it a prerequisite for obtaining their services .
Fouché gave the Danish @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that was made in Denmark , which led to nine days of uninterrupted demonstrations that forced the authorities to retract and revise the draft law : it consisted of saying that you could be put in a containment camp because you refuse vaccination , and that you can be forcibly treated against your will .
There is really something wrong with the arbitrariness of the prince in the face of individual liberty ; there is an excessive tension where the arbitrariness of the king , of the merchants who are around him and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are moving into what [ the French philosopher ] Foucault called ‘ biopower , ’ the idea that health becomes a totalitarian category.
” “ We are being led to something that is extremely nauseating and that you probably don ’ t want , ” he added .
Fouché also addressed the question of the innovative technology behind the new vaccines .
He said : “ You have heard as I have that there is talk of injecting , at the same time as the vaccine , either nanoparticles or RFIDs , in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ able to know if you are vaccinated or not : a vaccination certificate that starts to fluoresce when you pass your smartphone over it , and things like that .
Well , all the technology and patents are ready .
It hasn ’ t been talked about in the mainstream media , but that will come because it would be so ‘ convenient.
’ Now here is something that ’ s contemporary to this whole crisis : the idea that professional and medical secrecy have to be shattered , that your health is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has to be aware of .
Again , I invite you to think whether this is what you want.
” Fouché warned : “ The guilty haste with which the government has started talking , and the parliament also has started talking , about a constitutional amendment in view of a total vaccination obligation , makes me think that something needs to be done right away.
” In France , this constitutional amendment has been on the parliamentary agenda as of November 26 .
“ This is slowly leading us to be in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a totalitarian situation on a techno-sanitaristic basis .
We mustn ’ t be afraid or angry about it ; we just have to say no , very , very clearly , ” said Fouché .
“ In the same way , children should not be vaccinated , children have nothing to do with this business , ” he insisted .
“ COVID is not a childhood disease , as I told you they are not sick , not vectors , not transmitters , nor reservoirs .
So leave the children alone , like @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hey , teacher , leave the kids alone !
’ ” Fouché is not happy either with the way a completely new type of vaccine is being distributed with no foresight as to its potential issues .
“ Finally , there is a technical contextualization to be made : we are talking about vaccines that are quite innovative for a certain number of them .
Thirty-eight vaccines are at stake .
“ We are no longer making a risk-benefit assessment ; we are trying to impose a generalized vaccine in a brutal way @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and this is very problematic , ” he said .
Developing classical vaccines that use deactivated particles of virus is a lengthy and expensive process , Fouché explained .
The same goes for vaccines that use synthetic viral particles , and the results are uncertain .
He described the new process as follows : “ The new technology being used is based on nucleic acids , DNA or RNA.
” “ It ’ s an intellectual pirouette which is rather attractive .
That is to say , rather than injecting you with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , expensive , and takes time , they inject you with the message , the RNA , and it is you who in your cells will manufacture the viral particles that will become immunizing .
It ’ s very attractive , especially as RNA doesn ’ t cost anything to produce .
It ’ s very easy to do .
You can easily modify it using bio-computer technology .
There is no particular difficulty .
On the other hand , the difficulty resides in the fact that in reality , it ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ going to start on a synthesis by your cells of too many viral particles and be sick all the time , and have very serious forms of the illness , or if on the contrary you ’ re going to have a form where you 're going to synthesize very little and , in the end , the whole thing ’ s not going to work , or if it ’ s going to be just right and be very good.
” But there is an even more serious concern : “ We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is going to integrate into your genome.
” Fouché explained : “ What does that mean ?
Normally our genome is DNA , and ARN doesn ’ t retrotranscribe — unless if you have a retrotranscriptase , which is the enzyme that turns RNA into DNA .
Or if you have an integrase , which allows this DNA to enter into your own DNA .
It so happens that there are people who have these enzymes : all people who are HIV carriers [ . ]
... And then there are other systems @ @ @ @ @ @ @ human cell , that is to say this retrotranscription and then integration into your genome , to the point that we presently have 8 percent of our genome that is made of retroviruses that have been integrated .
These retroviruses are not expressed , but if they are ever reexpressed , some people think that this may be related , for example , to schizophrenia.
” “ We ’ re playing at sorcerer ’ s apprentice , ” he commented .
“ This is a case where ‘ science without conscience is but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ primum non nocere — first , do not harm — should be the basic principle of this whole affair .
No one knows what will happen , so be careful : we ’ re back to the Aristotelian phronesis , prudence .
“ The development of these vaccines has gone too fast , and Thomas Madden , who is the boss of Acuitas therapeutics , which makes the lipid nanoparticles that need to surround the RNA to stabilize it — because RNA , if left in nature , degrades quite rapidly — Madden @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by slowing down the process , said it ’ s going so fast , that it ’ s going too fast and that we haven ’ t had time to do the stability tests.
” Is the situation so bad that these risks could be justified ?
Fouché thinks not , and he said so in crude terms : “ On the beneficial effects : they ’ re trying to reduce the mortality or transmissibility of a virus that is relatively harmless in the population , where most of the consequences that have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and health-wise are related to health policy choices , not to the virus itself , or its virulence or its severity .
The effort must therefore focus on this : on health policy , on a health system which must be resilient , on protecting people who are weak and who are at risk of serious forms , not on pissing off the French , trying to get into their bodies.
” At the individual level , the benefice is nil He added : “ The benefit is not at all clear in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ level , it ’ s obviously nil , since you have healthy people in whom you inject something so that eventually they won ’ t get sick , whereas they would already have a very small risk of getting sick , strategically and epidemiologically .
For the moment we have these marketing punchlines from certain vaccine firms , like Pfizer and BioNTech , who have told us : the vaccines are 90 percent effective , even 92 or 95 percent .
What does that mean ?
Well , actually , we don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have data-monitoring .
It ’ s the vaccine companies themselves that provide us with those figures.
” “ For me , this is just something to sweep away .
It has no impact whatsoever .
It ’ s like I ’ m trying to sell you something , and I tell you it ’ s great .
It ’ s really marketing , progressive brainwashing to tell you that everything is fine , there are no side-effects , et cetera .
That is not true .
Right now , we just don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ know the age of the people who were vaccinated in the cohorts .
We don ’ t know their co-morbidities .
They ’ re probably healthy volunteers , so probably they would have made mild or asymptomatic forms of SARS-COV-2 anyway .
When they tell you that it reduces the number of severe forms , even the definition of severe forms is not given in the texts that you can read on marketing sites that are the showcases of the vaccine industry.
” Fouché also recalled what might be called the “ ordinary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : “ Regarding the side-effects , we talked about the risk of producing too many viruses , the risk of retrotransposons and integration of the viral genome .
But you also have the usual risk of vaccines and the risks are often immunological and delayed .
You probably know that the Pandemrix in 2009 for H1N1 is the cause of narcolepsy : there are people who are really very handicapped by it ; they fall asleep just like that .
It ’ s a very hard disease to live with , with an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as far as has been established , but there are probably people in whom it hasn ’ t been detected .
Then there are risks of autoimmune diseases , things like that .
It depends on the vaccine you have , and the adjuvant that was put into it.
” Why there are few assessments of long-term issues Fouché also warned about long-term issues with some vaccines : “ But in the end , it ’ s hard to see the side effects of the vaccine .
Why is that ?
Often you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ case is closed .
This is not true .
Most important side-effects occur much later .
And we have a problem here : as I told you , vaccine companies do not pay for vaccine side-effects , and who pays ?
The government .
Is it in the state ’ s interest to see if there are side-effects ?
No , it is not .
And so the state doesn ’ t fund research on the side-effects of vaccines , and neither does industry , so nobody really funds research on the side-effects @ @ @ @ @ @ @ real problem : you have no Phase 4 trials , no serious vaccine pharmacovigilance , and you have very low bibliometrics around key words related to vaccinal side-effects .
There are some very motivated teams , but often they are accused of being biased , because they exist because they are motivated to try to understand , and they have tiny budgets for their job .
Here we have a real systemic problem once again , a systemic corruption that makes us unwilling to face the adverse effects of vaccines.
” This prompted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of an absence of adverse effects within a period of two months among the tested cohorts doesn ’ t allow one to conclude anything at all .
Say “ no ” to the totalitarian dystopia !
His final warning was a call to lucidity : “ Caution invites you to refuse any totalitarian drift that would be linked with the vaccine idea itself : social credit , vaccination certificates under the skin , etc .
All this should shock you to the highest degree , and you should refuse it at the risk @ @ @ @ @ @ @ We have to stick together , we have to act , we have to write , we have to talk , we have to explain to people what I have just told you .
You will see , the government and its medical and pharmaceutical acolytes , the political , economic , medical , and technocratic power behind it , will recoil , because that is the only thing they can do when confronted with common sense and peace .
Maintain the balance of power .
Refuse this vaccination.
” LifeSiteNews has produced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ View it here .

Of the anti–'sanitary dictatorship' figureheads, Dr. Louis Fouché, an anesthetist and resuscitation specialist in one of the four major hospitals of Marseille, is one of the most vocal.
December 10, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — While people learned on Wednesday that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 “vaccine” is not recommended for people with “significant” allergic reactions, after two “adverse reactions,” the French are widely rejecting future vaccinations against the illness, scheduled to start in January. In a recent poll, 54 percent of respondents announced that they intend to receive the shot; further surveys are confirming that half of the French population is “against” the COVID-19 vaccine in a context of growing suspicion regarding vaccines in general and the breakneck speed with which Moderna, Pfizer, and other companies have developed new shots in particular. Many voices have been raised, not only on social media and anti-COVID-19 restrictions websites, but also in the mainstream media, with prominent anchors saying they won’t take a vaccine whose middle- and long-term effects are totally unknown.
Of the anti–“sanitary dictatorship” figureheads, Dr. Louis Fouché, an anesthetist and resuscitation specialist in one of the four major hospitals of Marseille, is one of the most vocal. He recently published a YouTube video that has been seen many tens of thousands of times, in which he offers a global “tour” of the dangers and flaws of the upcoming vaccine campaign in France, clearly advising all viewers not to have the shot.
Fouché is a respected doctor, who has the support of widely popular Pr. Didier Raoult of the Marseille unit of infectious maladies — the first and most prominent French academic who recommended the hydroxychloroquine-azythromicyne-zinc treatment for COVID-19 patients in the early phase of the disease. Fouché regularly pleads for a return to normal life, the end of fear and of compulsory masks, even heading a public event in Marseille last weekend to encourage all to stand up to the present wave of irrational panic.
His remarks regarding the current innovative RNA vaccines give valuable insights into the way these are supposed to work, but also the gigantic financial interests involved and the insane but clever way in which the authorities are promoting them.
— Article continues below Petition — SIGN: Join petition calling for a stop to COVID vaccine testing in Europe Show Petition Text 16601 have signed the petition. Let's get to 17500 ! Thank you for signing this petition! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Country... State... Sign this Petition Concerns over the health and safety of the human test subjects in Pfizer's European COVID vaccine study have caused two eminent doctors to launch a petition calling for an immediate halt to those studies. On December 1, 2020, Dr. Michael Yeadon, an ex chief of research at Pfizer and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a lung specialist and former department head of public health lodged an appeal to the EMA, the European Medicine Agency responsible for approving drugs across the EU, asking them to suspend the ongoing Pfizer/BioNtech COVID vaccine study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42). LifeSite is joining Drs. Yeadon and Wodarg in their call for an immediate suspension of this study and we are encouraging people to co-sign their petition to the EMA which is to be found in the petition section on this page. Please SIGN and SHARE this important petition, and then please contact the EMA at the address listed below, in the 'For More Information' section. In their application to the EMA, Drs. Yeadon and Wodarg give the following reasons why the Pfizer study could pose dangers to the health and safety of the study participants: First, the doctors say that the study design must be improved as the highly inaccurate PCR test is currently being used to detect the presence of COVID in the study participants. This means that the efficacy of the vaccine is in doubt. The doctors recommend changing from the PCR test to Sanger sequencing.
Second, and more important, the doctors advocate animal testing of the vaccine to exclude the possibility of the risks to the life and health of human participants from known side-effects of other similar studies on corona viruses. These side-effects can include: an exaggerated immune response when the subject comes into contact with the "real world" virus; possible infertility of an "indefinite duration" for women; severe allergic responses to polyethylene glycol which is contained in the mRNA vaccine being tested by Pfizer; and, other latent, serious side effects which, because of the short duration of the study, may only become known well after the conclusion of the study. Because of these unacceptable risks to the life and health of the Pfizer/BioNtech COVID vaccine study participants, we are joining with Drs. Yeadon and Wodarg as co-signers of their petition to the European Medicine Agency, asking for an immediate halt to these studies. Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING, today! And, after you have signed this petition, please send the sample email in the section below to the official European Medicine Agency email: [email protected] FOR MORE INFORMATION: Actual Petition Text (pdf): https://2020news.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Wodarg_Yeadon_EMA_Petition_Pfizer_Trial_FINAL_01DEC2020_EN_unsigned_with_Exhibits.pdf Sample Email: Subject: Please act on the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon and stay the Phase III clinical trial(s) of BNT162b Dear Sir or Madam, I am hereby co-signing the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon to support their urgent request to stay the Phase III clinical trial(s) of BNT162b (EudraCT Number 2020-002641-42) and other clinical trials. The full text of the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon can be found here: https://2020news.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Wodarg_Yeadon_EMA_Petition_Pfizer_Trial_FINAL_01DEC2020_EN_unsigned_with_Exhibits.pdf I hereby respectfully request that EMA act on the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon immediately. Regards, [Your name] **Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com Hide Petition Text Sign this Petition
COVID-19 vaccines are not and will not be compulsory in France, President Emmanuel Macron said in one of his recent addresses to the nation. But as Fouché shows, that may not be the end of the case.
Here are some of the highlights of Fouché’s remarks in his November 28 video.
Creating a “yes set”
Fouché first called attention to the modus operandi of the present vaccine-mongers: creating fear and hopelessness, the idea that restrictive measures are necessary, and the idea that hospitals should be protected from overload. All of these are widely shared in the population through media propaganda. “They have created a ‘yes set’: a hypnotic concatenation of concepts many agree with, ending with one that is false: the last one says that ‘the only way out is the vaccine.’” This excludes treatment, and treatment is available,” he recalled.
Later in his talk, he quoted a French Senate report on the H1N1 vaccine fiasco in France: “The more we increase fear, the more we increase the degree of acceptability of a vaccine in the general population.”
A vaccine, Fouché argued, is “a therapeutic tool like any other, not a religion.” We should before anything have a correct risk-benefit assessment, and this is lacking. “The vaccine is for people who are well and healthy. The focus of risk must be very much on the safety side,” he added: you shouldn’t take lightly the risk of making well people ill , especially when the fatality rate of COVID-19 is only 0.05 percent.
Fouché is especially wary of vaccinating children. “They are neither vectors nor contaminants,” he stated, quoting a French study that found “very, very few contaminations related to children,” noting the so-called “case of Contamine,” where a COVID-positive child was known to have been in contact with 178 people, not one of whom was contaminated. Instead, “[a]dults can contaminate children … but is that so serious?” he asked. To date in France, three children have died of COVID, two of whom were known to have serious illnesses.
SARS-COV-2 is a highly “mutable” virus
Another reason for rejecting the vaccine is that “ARN viruses” like SARS-COV-2 are particularly “mutable.”
“We’ve decoded the 5th and 6th mutants in Marseille: the 4th was already very far from the 1st. It’s a delusional idea to think that like with flu, we can use a strain from the Southern hemisphere after their winter to vaccinate in the North,” said Dr Fouché. The vaccine aims to create antibodies. “But these antibodies are not necessarily protective, and if they are, maybe not for long. We don’t know,” he pointed out.
Importantly, he recalled that “some antibodies” sparked by vaccines “are not protective, but facilitators.” He gave the example of dengue fever in the Philippines, where the vaccine created by Sanofi, a French laboratory, facilitated a second episode of dengue fever that was more severe than the first in those who had already had it.
“Dengvaxia short-circuited the first episode of benign dengue fever, as if preparing everyone who had had it to have a severe, hemorrhagic, and sometimes fatal dengue fever,” he said. “There were deaths that were completely attributable and fully attributed. There are ongoing lawsuits. Sanofi was driven out of the Philippines, and the vaccine was banned.”
“The same vaccine, oddly enough, is still authorized by the European Medicines Commission,” said Fouché, concluding his section on the “scientific contextualization” by recommending a paper by Kamran Abbasi, “Covid 19: politicisation, corruption and suppression of science,” published in the BMJ last November. “There is systemic corruption in the health system,” he stated, so that “you won’t know very well if these vaccines are effective, are there side effects, and so on.”
“There are other strategies against COVID-19”
In a second section, Dr Fouché pointed out that the legal and legislative context shows that rules around the manufacture of a vaccine are particular: “The procedure for making a vaccine has nothing to do with the procedure for putting a drug on the market. A drug follows safety phases one after the other, first preclinical, then clinical, and then has to demonstrate that it is more effective than other strategies, showing it renders a service that is important. Otherwise, it will not be marketed, because it will not obtain a marketing authorization.”
“Vaccines don’t follow that rationale. They are not asked to compete with other strategies that would be the gold standard in an infectious disease. This is a real problem: we’re to evaluate the vaccine on its own, as something that would be isolated from the rest. But in truth, nothing is isolated. There are other strategies against COVID-19 that would allow us to stop the delirium on the one hand and to stop the disease on the other hand, and they would keep the hospitals away from overload and strain.”
In the pandemic’s wake, vaccine development was accelerated, and safety procedures were whittled down. This “has gradually brought in an emergency regime into the law that is tending to normalize itself into a kind of totalitarian emergency regime that replaces the rule of law,” warned Fouché, adding: “This is really a problem, and we must return to democracy, the rule of law, and the normal regime of expression of the law.”
Vaccine-producers don’t take responsibility
The problem lies with developers’ absence of responsibility, Fouché explained: it is the State that bears the brunt of any costs related to undesirable side-effects, even the most serious ones. “These laws were passed at the American, European and then French levels, as usual, always in the same order, which means that vaccine companies do not have to worry about reimbursing adverse drug reactions and the legal proceedings that would be related to them. What? Does this mean that the people who develop these therapeutics are not responsible for their effects?” Fouché asked rhetorically.
“But that’s not normal. Ethically, there is something wrong. If you are sovereign, free, and you have the right to develop a treatment, for example, you have to take responsibility for the damage; you must take responsibility for the consequences,” he continued.
“We are responsible for what we do, in space and in time. When you pose the risk, you must weigh it in the medium and long term,” he added, and not make it weigh “on you and on me through our tax money.”
“This exit from the crisis is being developed in a context of fear and haste. Have you done many things in your life in fear and haste that have turned out to be good things? There is a cardinal value in Aristotelian philosophy called phronesis, which is prudence. It doesn’t mean cowardice; it means the intelligence of courage. You must have the contextual wisdom to see that the COVID-19 vaccine, which is being proposed to you here with plenty of marketing punchlines; you need to see the whys and wherefores, the context and the various issues behind it that are obviously not aiming at keeping you healthy,” said Fouché.
On the political side, he remarked: “There is a sociological and democratic context that is worrying, since many people are standing up to explain that vaccination must be linked with a law of exception, that would end up with a kind of totalitarian regime induced by the fact that if you refuse vaccination, you could be given a Chinese-style social credit. That is to say that access to civil rights, social rights, and various services would be denied you if you were not vaccinated.”
This is also of concern in France, because even if the COVID-19 vaccine is not compulsory, travel companies and others could make it a prerequisite for obtaining their services.
How the Danes rejected compulsory vaccination
Fouché gave the Danish example: “This is the proposal that was made in Denmark, which led to nine days of uninterrupted demonstrations that forced the authorities to retract and revise the draft law: it consisted of saying that you could be put in a containment camp because you refuse vaccination, and that you can be forcibly treated against your will. There is really something wrong with the arbitrariness of the prince in the face of individual liberty; there is an excessive tension where the arbitrariness of the king, of the merchants who are around him and of the medical power that surrounds him are moving into what [the French philosopher] Foucault called ‘biopower,’ the idea that health becomes a totalitarian category.”
“We are being led to something that is extremely nauseating and that you probably don’t want,” he added.
Nanoparticles, RFIDs, and tracing
Fouché also addressed the question of the innovative technology behind the new vaccines. He said:
“You have heard as I have that there is talk of injecting, at the same time as the vaccine, either nanoparticles or RFIDs, in any case, a way to be able to know if you are vaccinated or not: a vaccination certificate that starts to fluoresce when you pass your smartphone over it, and things like that. Well, all the technology and patents are ready. It hasn’t been talked about in the mainstream media, but that will come because it would be so ‘convenient.’ Now here is something that’s contemporary to this whole crisis: the idea that professional and medical secrecy have to be shattered, that your health is a kind of public good that everybody has to be aware of. Again, I invite you to think whether this is what you want.”
Fouché warned: “The guilty haste with which the government has started talking, and the parliament also has started talking, about a constitutional amendment in view of a total vaccination obligation, makes me think that something needs to be done right away.”
In France, this constitutional amendment has been on the parliamentary agenda as of November 26. “This is slowly leading us to be in the situation of the white Khmers, a totalitarian situation on a techno-sanitaristic basis. We mustn’t be afraid or angry about it; we just have to say no, very, very clearly,” said Fouché.
“In the same way, children should not be vaccinated, children have nothing to do with this business,” he insisted. “COVID is not a childhood disease, as I told you they are not sick, not vectors, not transmitters, nor reservoirs. So leave the children alone, like in ‘The Wall’: ‘Hey, teacher, leave the kids alone!’”
“Trying to impose a generalized vaccine in a brutal way”
Fouché is not happy either with the way a completely new type of vaccine is being distributed with no foresight as to its potential issues.
“Finally, there is a technical contextualization to be made: we are talking about vaccines that are quite innovative for a certain number of them. Thirty-eight vaccines are at stake.
“We are no longer making a risk-benefit assessment; we are trying to impose a generalized vaccine in a brutal way through manipulation techniques and social engineering, and this is very problematic,” he said.
Developing classical vaccines that use deactivated particles of virus is a lengthy and expensive process, Fouché explained. The same goes for vaccines that use synthetic viral particles, and the results are uncertain. He described the new process as follows:
“The new technology being used is based on nucleic acids, DNA or RNA.”
How ARN vaccines work
“It’s an intellectual pirouette which is rather attractive. That is to say, rather than injecting you with the proteic immunizing particle, which is complicated, expensive, and takes time, they inject you with the message, the RNA, and it is you who in your cells will manufacture the viral particles that will become immunizing. It’s very attractive, especially as RNA doesn’t cost anything to produce. It’s very easy to do. You can easily modify it using bio-computer technology. There is no particular difficulty. On the other hand, the difficulty resides in the fact that in reality, it’s hard to know if you’re going to start on a synthesis by your cells of too many viral particles and be sick all the time, and have very serious forms of the illness, or if on the contrary you’re going to have a form where you're going to synthesize very little and, in the end, the whole thing’s not going to work, or if it’s going to be just right and be very good.” But there is an even more serious concern: “We can’t know whether the RNA is going to integrate into your genome.”
Fouché explained: “What does that mean? Normally our genome is DNA, and ARN doesn’t retrotranscribe — unless if you have a retrotranscriptase, which is the enzyme that turns RNA into DNA. Or if you have an integrase, which allows this DNA to enter into your own DNA. It so happens that there are people who have these enzymes: all people who are HIV carriers[.] … And then there are other systems as well that put retrotransposons in the human cell, that is to say this retrotranscription and then integration into your genome, to the point that we presently have 8 percent of our genome that is made of retroviruses that have been integrated. These retroviruses are not expressed, but if they are ever reexpressed, some people think that this may be related, for example, to schizophrenia.”
Sorcerer’s apprentices
“We’re playing at sorcerer’s apprentice,” he commented. “This is a case where ‘science without conscience is but ruin of the soul,’ and primum non nocere — first, do not harm — should be the basic principle of this whole affair. No one knows what will happen, so be careful: we’re back to the Aristotelian phronesis, prudence.
“The development of these vaccines has gone too fast, and Thomas Madden, who is the boss of Acuitas therapeutics, which makes the lipid nanoparticles that need to surround the RNA to stabilize it — because RNA, if left in nature, degrades quite rapidly — Madden himself, who has nothing to gain by slowing down the process, said it’s going so fast, that it’s going too fast and that we haven’t had time to do the stability tests.”
Is the situation so bad that these risks could be justified? Fouché thinks not, and he said so in crude terms:
“On the beneficial effects: they’re trying to reduce the mortality or transmissibility of a virus that is relatively harmless in the population, where most of the consequences that have been observed socially and sociologically and economically and health-wise are related to health policy choices, not to the virus itself, or its virulence or its severity. The effort must therefore focus on this: on health policy, on a health system which must be resilient, on protecting people who are weak and who are at risk of serious forms, not on pissing off the French, trying to get into their bodies.”
At the individual level, the benefice is nil
He added: “The benefit is not at all clear in the general population. At the individual level, it’s obviously nil, since you have healthy people in whom you inject something so that eventually they won’t get sick, whereas they would already have a very small risk of getting sick, strategically and epidemiologically. For the moment we have these marketing punchlines from certain vaccine firms, like Pfizer and BioNTech, who have told us: the vaccines are 90 percent effective, even 92 or 95 percent. What does that mean? Well, actually, we don’t know, because we don't have data-monitoring. It’s the vaccine companies themselves that provide us with those figures.”
Fouché commented:
“For me, this is just something to sweep away. It has no impact whatsoever. It’s like I’m trying to sell you something, and I tell you it’s great. It’s really marketing, progressive brainwashing to tell you that everything is fine, there are no side-effects, et cetera. That is not true. Right now, we just don’t know. We don’t know the age of the people who were vaccinated in the cohorts. We don’t know their co-morbidities. They’re probably healthy volunteers, so probably they would have made mild or asymptomatic forms of SARS-COV-2 anyway. When they tell you that it reduces the number of severe forms, even the definition of severe forms is not given in the texts that you can read on marketing sites that are the showcases of the vaccine industry.”
Fouché also recalled what might be called the “ordinary” issues with a number of vaccines: “Regarding the side-effects, we talked about the risk of producing too many viruses, the risk of retrotransposons and integration of the viral genome. But you also have the usual risk of vaccines and the risks are often immunological and delayed. You probably know that the Pandemrix in 2009 for H1N1 is the cause of narcolepsy: there are people who are really very handicapped by it; they fall asleep just like that. It’s a very hard disease to live with, with an incidence of one per 100,000 in France as far as has been established, but there are probably people in whom it hasn’t been detected. Then there are risks of autoimmune diseases, things like that. It depends on the vaccine you have, and the adjuvant that was put into it.”
Why there are few assessments of long-term issues
Fouché also warned about long-term issues with some vaccines:
“But in the end, it’s hard to see the side effects of the vaccine. Why is that? Often you are told, within three months the case is closed. This is not true. Most important side-effects occur much later. And we have a problem here: as I told you, vaccine companies do not pay for vaccine side-effects, and who pays? The government. Is it in the state’s interest to see if there are side-effects? No, it is not. And so the state doesn’t fund research on the side-effects of vaccines, and neither does industry, so nobody really funds research on the side-effects of vaccines. It’s a real problem: you have no Phase 4 trials, no serious vaccine pharmacovigilance, and you have very low bibliometrics around key words related to vaccinal side-effects. There are some very motivated teams, but often they are accused of being biased, because they exist because they are motivated to try to understand, and they have tiny budgets for their job. Here we have a real systemic problem once again, a systemic corruption that makes us unwilling to face the adverse effects of vaccines.”
This prompted Fouché to make clear that being told of an absence of adverse effects within a period of two months among the tested cohorts doesn’t allow one to conclude anything at all.
Say “no” to the totalitarian dystopia!
His final warning was a call to lucidity: “Caution invites you to refuse any totalitarian drift that would be linked with the vaccine idea itself: social credit, vaccination certificates under the skin, etc. All this should shock you to the highest degree, and you should refuse it at the risk of going toward a totalitarian dystopia. We have to stick together, we have to act, we have to write, we have to talk, we have to explain to people what I have just told you. You will see, the government and its medical and pharmaceutical acolytes, the political, economic, medical, and technocratic power behind it, will recoil, because that is the only thing they can do when confronted with common sense and peace. Maintain the balance of power. Refuse this vaccination.”
LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here.
Share


lifesitenews--2020-12-10--BREAKING: YouTube reverses ban on LifeSiteNews

December 10 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) — YouTube has lifted its suspension of LifeSiteNews ’ channel on the video platform , days after sanctioning this publication for a video in which Bishop Joseph Strickland of Tyler , Texas , explained why he could not in good conscience take any COVID-19 vaccine derived from or developed with the cells of aborted babies .
On Monday , YouTube placed a two-week suspension on LifeSite ’ s channel , claiming that the episode of The Bishop Strickland Show was “ medical misinformation.
” ( Readers can learn the truth about which COVID-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ use fetal cells by clicking here ) .
LifeSite quickly filed an appeal , noting that while YouTube ’ s Terms and Conditions surrounding “ COVID-19 Medical Misinformation ” state that “ videos claiming that the COVID-19 vaccine will contain fetal tissue ” are not allowed on YouTube , Bp .
Strickland actually states in the video , “ I am not going to accept a vaccine that has the DNA of aborted children in it .
That is the good thing about the Pfizer vaccine , it does not contain the DNA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ basic principles of contract law , we are relying on YouTube to abide by their own TOS so we know what we can and can not post , ” LifeSite wrote .
“ As evidenced by the quotes above , this video should not be removed under the TOS .
If there is another term besides the one cited by us above , could you specify which term was violated ?
” On Thursday morning , YouTube lifted LifeSite ’ s suspension , enabling LifeSite to resume uploads and reducing LifeSite to a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But while LifeSite ’ s latest ordeal may be over , censorship on the Google-owned video giant appears slated to reach new heights .
YouTube announced this week that “ we will start removing any piece of content uploaded today ( or anytime after ) that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S. Presidential election.
” Although LifeSiteNews is grateful that our 200,000 YouTube subscribers can watch new videos again , we know that censorship from YouTube is not over , and we must @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our reach on alternative platforms such as LifeSiteNews ’ Rumble channel .
Please support us in these efforts by donating to our Christmas Campaign today at give.lifesitenews.com .

December 10, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — YouTube has lifted its suspension of LifeSiteNews’ channel on the video platform, days after sanctioning this publication for a video in which Bishop Joseph Strickland of Tyler, Texas, explained why he could not in good conscience take any COVID-19 vaccine derived from or developed with the cells of aborted babies.
On Monday, YouTube placed a two-week suspension on LifeSite’s channel, claiming that the episode of The Bishop Strickland Show was “medical misinformation.” (Readers can learn the truth about which COVID-19 vaccines in development do or do not use fetal cells by clicking here).
LifeSite quickly filed an appeal, noting that while YouTube’s Terms and Conditions surrounding “COVID-19 Medical Misinformation” state that “videos claiming that the COVID-19 vaccine will contain fetal tissue” are not allowed on YouTube, Bp. Strickland actually states in the video, “I am not going to accept a vaccine that has the DNA of aborted children in it. That is the good thing about the Pfizer vaccine, it does not contain the DNA of aborted children.”
“According to basic principles of contract law, we are relying on YouTube to abide by their own TOS so we know what we can and cannot post,” LifeSite wrote. “As evidenced by the quotes above, this video should not be removed under the TOS. If there is another term besides the one cited by us above, could you specify which term was violated?”
On Thursday morning, YouTube lifted LifeSite’s suspension, enabling LifeSite to resume uploads and reducing LifeSite to a single warning and Strike #1.
But while LifeSite’s latest ordeal may be over, censorship on the Google-owned video giant appears slated to reach new heights. YouTube announced this week that “we will start removing any piece of content uploaded today (or anytime after) that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S. Presidential election.”
Although LifeSiteNews is grateful that our 200,000 YouTube subscribers can watch new videos again, we know that censorship from YouTube is not over, and we must still do all we can to build our reach on alternative platforms such as LifeSiteNews’ Rumble channel. Please support us in these efforts by donating to our Christmas Campaign today at give.lifesitenews.com.
Share


lifesitenews--2020-12-10--Join our daily worldwide rosary HERE

Join our daily worldwide rosary HERE

December 10 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) – In response to the crisis unfolding in our world and in the Church , LifeSite is offering Catholics throughout the world a chance to be united daily in prayer , in the Our Lady of Fatima Rosary Crusade .
Catholics from all over the world—from Israel , Uganda , Italy , France , Germany , Ireland , Pakistan , Singapore , the Philippines , India , Indonesia , Australia , New Zealand , Thailand , the United Kingdom , the U.S. , Canada , Brazil , and other countries—are gathering daily to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Anthony Pillari , J.C.L.
, an American priest currently studying in Italy .
Our goal is , by means of this daily rosary and by embracing and living out the message given by the Virgin Mary at Fatima , the triumph of Our Lady ’ s Immaculate Heart .
To help obtain that goal , Bishop Athanasius Schneider graciously composed the following prayer for this worldwide rosary crusade : O Immaculate Heart of Mary , you are the holy Mother of God and our tender Mother .
Look upon the distress in which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are living because of the spread of materialism and the persecution of the Church .
In Fatima you warned against these errors , as you spoke about the errors of Russia .
You are the Mediatrix of all graces .
Implore your Divine Son to grant this special grace for the Pope : that he might consecrate Russia to your Immaculate Heart , so that Russia will be converted , a period of peace will be granted to the world , and your Immaculate Heart will triumph , through an authentic renewal of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ purity of the Catholic Faith , of the sacredness of Divine worship and of the holiness of the Christian life .
O Queen of the holy Rosary and our sweet Mother , turn your merciful eyes to us and graciously hear this our trusting prayer .
Amen .
+ Athanasius Schneider , Auxiliary Bishop of the archdiocese of Saint Mary in Astana To learn more about the urgency of responding to Our Lady ’ s message at Fatima , and about what you can do , please read Cardinal Burke ’ s 2017 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ https : //voiceofthefamily.com/full-text-cardinal-burkes-historic-call-for-consecration-of-russia/ ) .
As St. Padre Pio once said , “ The rosary is the weapon for these times.
” Through prayer , God can shape history , change the world , and bring about a great time of renewal and peace for the Church and for the world , through the triumph of Our Lady ’ s Immaculate Heart .
Join us today !
If you would like to follow along with the prayers said during this rosary , you can access them via this PDF .
This document also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the daily rosary on LifeSite led by Fr .
Pillari .

(LifeSiteNews) — In response to the crisis unfolding in our world and in the Church, LifeSite is happy to promote Regina Angelorum Press’s Daily Rosary, which is offering Catholics throughout the world the chance to be united daily in prayer, in the Our Lady of Fatima Rosary Crusade.
Catholics from all over the world — from Israel, Uganda, Italy, France, Germany, Ireland, Pakistan, Singapore, the Philippines, India, Indonesia, Australia, New Zealand, Thailand, the United Kingdom, the U.S., Canada, Brazil, and other countries — are gathering daily to pray the Rosary, led by Father Pillari, JCL, MCL, STL, an American priest currently studying in Italy.
The Daily Rosary is being offered each day at 12noon EST through Regina Angelorum Press’ YouTube Channel to which you can subscribe HERE.
The goal is, by means of this Daily Rosary and by embracing and living out the message given by the Virgin Mary at Fatima, the triumph of Our Lady’s Immaculate Heart.
To help obtain that goal, Bishop Athanasius Schneider graciously composed the following prayer for this worldwide Rosary crusade:
O Immaculate Heart of Mary, you are the holy Mother of God and our tender Mother. Look upon the distress in which the Church and the whole of humanity are living because of the spread of materialism and the persecution of the Church. In Fatima you warned against these errors, as you spoke about the errors of Russia. You are the Mediatrix of all graces. Implore your Divine Son to grant this special grace for the Pope: that he might consecrate Russia to your Immaculate Heart, so that Russia will be converted, a period of peace will be granted to the world, and your Immaculate Heart will triumph, through an authentic renewal of the Church in the splendor of the purity of the Catholic Faith, of the sacredness of Divine worship and of the holiness of the Christian life. O Queen of the holy Rosary and our sweet Mother, turn your merciful eyes to us and graciously hear this our trusting prayer. Amen. + Athanasius Schneider, Auxiliary Bishop of the archdiocese of Saint Mary in Astana
To learn more about the urgency of responding to Our Lady’s message at Fatima, and about what you can do, please read Cardinal Burke’s 2017 address at the Rome Life Forum.
As St. Padre Pio once said, “The Rosary is the weapon for these times.” Through prayer, God can shape history, change the world, and bring about a great time of renewal and peace for the Church and for the world, through the triumph of Our Lady’s Immaculate Heart. Join us today!
If you would like to follow along with the prayers said during this Rosary, you can access them HERE. The document also includes a brief F.A.Q. pertaining to the daily Rosary.
You can send your prayer requests to https://reginangelorumpress.com/prayer-intentions/
Share


lifesitenews--2020-12-10--Being a ‘pro-choice pastor’ is like being a Moloch-worshiping Christian

December 10 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) — It is one thing to be a radical , feminist atheist marching down the streets of D.C. and proclaiming your “ right ” to abortion .
It is another thing to be a “ pro-choice pastor , ” as Senate candidate Raphael Warnock claims to be , using the Bible to justify abortion .
This is as morally compromised as it is theologically confused .
Yet Warnock is unashamed of his position , tweeting on December 8 , “ I am a pro-choice pastor.
” Worse still , as of this writing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ likes , representing almost half of the 500,000 followers of the Reverend Raphael Warnock Twitter account .
How can a reverend support abortion ?
How can a preacher of the gospel , whose sacred text is the Bible , support the killing of the unborn in the womb ?
And how can he do it without qualification , thereby including the “ right ” to kill the baby through the ninth month of pregnancy ?
What an absolute travesty .
But Warnock is not alone in his misguided zeal .
A pro-life colleague @ @ @ @ @ @ @ home city who tithed on her earnings ( meaning , donated 10 percent of her abortion profits to her church ) .
She believed she was doing God ’ s work .
This colleague also sent me pictures of Dr. George Tiller ( the late-term abortionist who was murdered by a misguided pro-life zealot ) baptizing the corpses of babies he had just aborted .
He did this , I was told , to bring closure for the grieving parents .
Another colleague of mine met with a group of inner-city pastors some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with him for a major pro-life prayer rally .
One of the pastors said to him , “ We just took up a collection in my church to help a young lady get an abortion.
” How can this be ?
It ’ s one thing to “ shout your abortion ” as a God-mocker or an atheist or agnostic .
It ’ s another thing to claim to be a follower of Jesus and a lover of the Scriptures and to support abortion .
That ’ s why Rev .
Warnock ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pro-life leaders .
As Lila Rose tweeted , “ This is grotesque .
You don ’ t preach Christ or His gospel ; you preach the shedding of the innocent blood of his children .
How dare you use the name ‘ pastor.
’ ” ( Sadly , although Lila Rose has about half of the Twitter followers that Warnock does , her tweet has only received about 2,500 likes . )
What , then , would the alleged “ Christian ” argument for the pro-choice position look like ?
It would argue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ merely a fetus without fully human status .
It would argue that in many situations , abortion is the compassionate choice due to the mental or physical health of the mother or the financial condition of the family .
It would point to tragic cases like the incestuous rape of a 12-year-old girl , resulting in an unwanted ( and totally traumatic ) pregnancy , one that could scar this child for life .
What gives anyone the right to force this child to carry the baby of her rapist ?
And who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is born ?
And it would point to other tragic cases of babies born with severe deformities and life-shortening conditions , conditions readily visible on the ultra-sounds .
Surely it is better to terminate this life in the womb rather than bring the baby into the world for months of intense suffering and hundreds of thousands of dollars in medical bills , only to watch it die an agonizing and tortured death while still an infant .
Yes , there are Christian-sounding arguments that can be made for abortion , except they all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bible makes clear that it is God who forms the child in the womb and God who gives life to the child in the womb .
And , just as it would be wrong to kill a severely handicapped baby after birth , it is wrong to kill a severely handicapped baby before birth .
That ’ s why the early Christians not only rescued abandoned babies , at the risk of their own lives , but they also militantly opposed abortion .
In another article , I laid out the main scriptural @ @ @ @ @ @ @ position .
But for the moment , I have a simple request for Reverend Warnock .
Talk to the women who had an abortion years ago and who still regret and agonize over the decisions they made .
Talk to the former Planned Parenthood workers who , with many tears , will describe the evil of their past profession .
Or better still , stand next to the remains of more than 60 million babies — the tiny limbs and eyes and feet and fingers and brains and hearts , with a disproportionate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and say , “ I ’ m a pro-choice pastor.
” And do this in the sight of a holy God who loves life , who loves justice , and who cares “ for the least of these.
” May the Lord grant you repentance , Reverend Warnock .
Right now , there is blood on your hands .
LifeSiteNews is facing increasing censorship .
Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video library .

Senate candidate Rev. Raphael Warnock is as morally compromised as he is theologically confused.
December 10, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — It is one thing to be a radical, feminist atheist marching down the streets of D.C. and proclaiming your “right” to abortion. It is another thing to be a “pro-choice pastor,” as Senate candidate Raphael Warnock claims to be, using the Bible to justify abortion. This is as morally compromised as it is theologically confused.
Yet Warnock is unashamed of his position, tweeting on December 8, “I am a pro-choice pastor.” Worse still, as of this writing, his tweet has more than 215,000 likes, representing almost half of the 500,000 followers of the Reverend Raphael Warnock Twitter account.
How can a reverend support abortion? How can a preacher of the gospel, whose sacred text is the Bible, support the killing of the unborn in the womb? And how can he do it without qualification, thereby including the “right” to kill the baby through the ninth month of pregnancy? What an absolute travesty.
But Warnock is not alone in his misguided zeal.
A pro-life colleague told me about an abortionist in our home city who tithed on her earnings (meaning, donated 10 percent of her abortion profits to her church). She believed she was doing God’s work.
This colleague also sent me pictures of Dr. George Tiller (the late-term abortionist who was murdered by a misguided pro-life zealot) baptizing the corpses of babies he had just aborted. He did this, I was told, to bring closure for the grieving parents.
Another colleague of mine met with a group of inner-city pastors some years ago, inviting them to join with him for a major pro-life prayer rally. One of the pastors said to him, “We just took up a collection in my church to help a young lady get an abortion.”
How can this be?
It’s one thing to “shout your abortion” as a God-mocker or an atheist or agnostic.
It’s another thing to claim to be a follower of Jesus and a lover of the Scriptures and to support abortion.
That’s why Rev. Warnock’s pro-choice tweet drew such scorn from pro-life leaders.
— Article continues below Petition — PETITION: Defend our right to "Choose Life"! Show Petition Text 11454 have signed the petition. Let's get to 12500 ! Thank you for signing this petition! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Country... State... Sign this Petition States are blocking pro-lifers from sharing the simple message “Choose Life” on their vehicles! Please SIGN this joint petition between LifeSite and The Children First Foundation to make "Choose Life" license plates available in every state! Tell governors and state officials to allow this pro-life freedom of speech. Advertising industry statistics show that, for the typical vehicle, a “Choose Life” plate and its simple, powerful message will be seen by other drivers 30,000 to 80,000 times a year. And, across the U.S., “Choose Life” vehicle license plates (or tags) have raised more than $28 million for pro-life pregnancy centers, maternity homes, safe havens, and adoption centers, varying with each state. The potential for expanding the “Choose Life” license plate program to new states and new members is incredible – but only if citizens are allowed to have the plates! It is appalling that seventeen U.S. states do not allow their citizens the right to put “Choose Life” license plates on their vehicles. The plates have been called pro-life “scare tactics” by Planned Parenthood and unlawful or hateful “private speech” by pro-abortion lawyers. The “Choose Life” message, however, is one of pure love that scares nobody except those who profit from death. It is unacceptable that we are blocked from our God-given and Constitutional right to spread the message of love and life for vulnerable unborn and newborn children. Your signature on this petition – no matter where you live – will help to get the “Choose Life” license plate program in states where it is not yet permitted! Please SIGN and SHARE this petition to make a real difference in persuading these state governments and Departments of Motor Vehicles to “Choose Life.” Consider, for example, our experience in New York, where Governor Andrew Cuomo is a nationally-recognized advocate of abortion and has been a relentless opponent of the pro-life movement. Cuomo has blocked the approval of “Choose Life” license plates in NY, despite widespread support for these truly positive messages of love and life. A headline in the New York Post declared, “The DMV Acts Like We Live in Pyongyang.” And, in nearby New Jersey and Connecticut, similar hurdles were faced. But we took the fight to the government officials and even to federal court. And, with the help of petitions, we were able to get “Choose Life” license plates on the road in both states. It is high time for us to convert EVERY state in America to choose life. Your signature on this petition - no matter where you live - will help make that happen by placing “Choose Life” license plates on tens of thousands more cars. For love, for life, for the babies, please SIGN and SHARE our worldwide petition to tell state officials and politicians to stop blocking approval of the “Choose Life” license plate! FOR MORE INFORMATION: Please click on this link to read many past LifeSite articles on "Choose Life" license plates: https://www.lifesitenews.com/tags/tag/choose+life+plates Hide Petition Text Sign this Petition
As Lila Rose tweeted, “This is grotesque. You don’t preach Christ or His gospel; you preach the shedding of the innocent blood of his children. How dare you use the name ‘pastor.’” (Sadly, although Lila Rose has about half of the Twitter followers that Warnock does, her tweet has only received about 2,500 likes.)
What, then, would the alleged “Christian” argument for the pro-choice position look like?
It would argue that the child in the womb is merely a fetus without fully human status.
It would argue that in many situations, abortion is the compassionate choice due to the mental or physical health of the mother or the financial condition of the family.
It would point to tragic cases like the incestuous rape of a 12-year-old girl, resulting in an unwanted (and totally traumatic) pregnancy, one that could scar this child for life. What gives anyone the right to force this child to carry the baby of her rapist? And who will care for the baby when it is born?
And it would point to other tragic cases of babies born with severe deformities and life-shortening conditions, conditions readily visible on the ultra-sounds. Surely it is better to terminate this life in the womb rather than bring the baby into the world for months of intense suffering and hundreds of thousands of dollars in medical bills, only to watch it die an agonizing and tortured death while still an infant.
Yes, there are Christian-sounding arguments that can be made for abortion, except they all break down on this point: The Bible makes clear that it is God who forms the child in the womb and God who gives life to the child in the womb. And, just as it would be wrong to kill a severely handicapped baby after birth, it is wrong to kill a severely handicapped baby before birth.
That’s why the early Christians not only rescued abandoned babies, at the risk of their own lives, but they also militantly opposed abortion.
In another article, I laid out the main scriptural texts from which we get our pro-life position.
But for the moment, I have a simple request for Reverend Warnock.
Talk to the women who had an abortion years ago and who still regret and agonize over the decisions they made.
Talk to the former Planned Parenthood workers who, with many tears, will describe the evil of their past profession.
Or better still, stand next to the remains of more than 60 million babies — the tiny limbs and eyes and feet and fingers and brains and hearts, with a disproportionate percentage of those remains being black – and say, “I’m a pro-choice pastor.” And do this in the sight of a holy God who loves life, who loves justice, and who cares “for the least of these.”
May the Lord grant you repentance, Reverend Warnock. Right now, there is blood on your hands.
LifeSiteNews is facing increasing censorship. Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video library.
Follow Michael Dr. Brown is the author of more than 35 books, including Our Hands Are Stained with Blood: The Tragic Story of the “Church” and the Jewish People, which has been translated into more than twelve languages, the highly acclaimed five-volume series, Answering Jewish Objections to Jesus, a commentary on Jeremiah (part of the revised edition of the Expositor’s Bible Commentary), and several books on revival and the Jesus revolution. His most recent book is Evangelicals at the Crossroads: Will We Pass the Trump Test?
Share