lifesitenews--2020-11-25--Pro-abortion Meghan Markle acknowledges humanity of miscarried child

November 25 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) — The pro-abortion Duchess of Sussex , Meghan Markle , implicitly acknowledged the humanity of unborn babies by sharing the pain of losing her child to miscarriage in an essay in The New York Times today .
“ Losing a child means carrying an almost unbearable grief , experienced by many but talked about by few , ” she wrote .
“ Yet despite the staggering commonality of this pain , the conversation remains taboo , riddled with ( unwarranted ) shame , and perpetuating a cycle of solitary mourning.
” Markle also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ approached with concern , “ ‘ Are you OK ?
” a journalist asked me , ” the wife of the United Kingdom ’ s Prince Harry recounted .
“ I answered him honestly , not knowing that what I said would resonate with so many — new moms and older ones , and anyone who had , in their own way , been silently suffering.
” Even though the duchess recognized that due to her miscarriage she lost her child , she has expressed her support for abortion in the past .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ repealed constitutional protections for unborn children in a May 2018 referendum .
Together with her husband , she attended a party at the British ambassador ’ s residence in Dublin , Ireland , as part of their first foreign tour after their marriage in 2018 .
Pro-repeal Sen. Catherine Noone of Ireland was at the same party and tweeted , “ The Duchess and I had a chat about the recent referendum result — she watched with interest and was pleased to see the result.
” In the same year , when news @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pregnancy broke , the official announcement acknowledged the duchess was expecting a human being .
“ On 15 October 2018 , Kensington Palace announced that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex were expecting their first child … The palace stated that the royal couple were ‘ very pleased ’ to be able to share their news with the world , ” reported the UK Independent .
Similar dynamics played out recently in the media when singer John Legend , who called for boycotting states with restrictive abortion laws , and his outspokenly pro-abortion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ anguish over losing their child in stillbirth at 20 weeks .
People magazine wrote , “ Teigen talked about grieving the couple ’ s loss , saying , ‘ I definitely give myself permission to have complete and utter grief … Obviously it ’ s so painful to go through something like this as a woman , something that was inside your body that you were nurturing and taking care of.
” Pro-lifers have long recognized the pain of loss of life in both abortion and miscarriage and have resources in place for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ members of the body of Christ , the Church , we are called to bear witness to the loss of every life , no matter how brief or small , ” wrote Mary McClusky , acting as Outreach for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops in 2013 .
“ Let us pray that our growing sensitivity to the loss of a child through miscarriage will better assist grieving parents and help them to entrust their child to God ’ s unfailing care and mercy .
”

November 25, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — The pro-abortion Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle, implicitly acknowledged the humanity of unborn babies by sharing the pain of losing her child to miscarriage in an essay in The New York Times today.
“Losing a child means carrying an almost unbearable grief, experienced by many but talked about by few,” she wrote. “Yet despite the staggering commonality of this pain, the conversation remains taboo, riddled with (unwarranted) shame, and perpetuating a cycle of solitary mourning.”
Markle also talked about the healing aspect of being approached with concern,
“‘Are you OK?” a journalist asked me,” the wife of the United Kingdom’s Prince Harry recounted. “I answered him honestly, not knowing that what I said would resonate with so many — new moms and older ones, and anyone who had, in their own way, been silently suffering.”
Even though the duchess recognized that due to her miscarriage she lost her child, she has expressed her support for abortion in the past.
Markle was “pleased” when Ireland repealed constitutional protections for unborn children in a May 2018 referendum. Together with her husband, she attended a party at the British ambassador’s residence in Dublin, Ireland, as part of their first foreign tour after their marriage in 2018. Pro-repeal Sen. Catherine Noone of Ireland was at the same party and tweeted, “The Duchess and I had a chat about the recent referendum result — she watched with interest and was pleased to see the result.”
In the same year, when news of the royal couple’s first pregnancy broke, the official announcement acknowledged the duchess was expecting a human being. “On 15 October 2018, Kensington Palace announced that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex were expecting their first child … The palace stated that the royal couple were ‘very pleased’ to be able to share their news with the world,” reported the UK Independent.
Similar dynamics played out recently in the media when singer John Legend, who called for boycotting states with restrictive abortion laws, and his outspokenly pro-abortion wife Chrissy Teigen very publicly displayed their anguish over losing their child in stillbirth at 20 weeks.
People magazine wrote, “Teigen talked about grieving the couple’s loss, saying, ‘I definitely give myself permission to have complete and utter grief … Obviously it’s so painful to go through something like this as a woman, something that was inside your body that you were nurturing and taking care of.”
— Article continues below Petition — URGENT PETITION: Tell the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade Show Petition Text 61375 have signed the petition. Let's get to 70000 ! Thank you for signing this petition! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Country... State... Sign this Petition PETITION UPDATE (9/26/2020): With President Trump's nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court left by the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, we are closer than we have been in decades to seeing Roe vs. Wade overturned. We now encourage the Senate to confirm Barrett as the next Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. Judge Barrett has a fantastic track recond on sanctity of life issues, has seven children, and is a devout believer. She is the perfect remedy for Ruth Bader Ginsburg's radical pro-abortionism. Please READ the full story here: 'BREAKING: Trump nominates Catholic mom of 7 Judge Amy Coney Barrett to Supreme Court' And then, please SIGN this petition telling the High Court that it's now time to end the activist Roe vs. Wade judgment. Thank you! __________________________________________________________________ PETITION UPDATE (6/29/2020): In a decision which has imperiled more abortion-minded women, sentenced more preborn to death, and upset pro-lifers across the nation,the United States Supreme Court decided 5-4 to strike down a Louisiana law requiring basic medical precautions in the event of abortion complications, with Chief Justice John Roberts reversing his own past decision to uphold a similar Texas law. Liberal Justice Stephen Breyer wrote the majority opinion, which held that the Louisiana law was unconstitutional for the simple fact that it was “almost word-for-word identical” to the Texas one the court already struck down in 2016. In his concurring opinion, Chief Justice Roberts acknowledged that he had “joined the dissent in Whole Woman’s Health and continue to believe that the case was wrongly decided. The question today however is not whether Whole Woman’s Health was right or wrong, but whether to adhere to it in deciding the present case.” We call on the Supreme Court to stop supporting the culture of death and overturn Roe vs Wade, now. PETITION UPDATE (1/20/2020): Hundreds of thousands of people will gather in Washington, D.C., this coming Friday, January 24th, for the March for Life. They will be praying for an end to Roe vs Wade, as the Supreme Court will hear a crucial, abortion-related case later this year in March. United our voices can change the course of history. Sign this petition TODAY! (LEARN MORE BELOW) PETITION UPDATE (1/3/2020): In advance of the Supreme Court's hearing arguments in an important abortion case later this year in March, 207 U.S. Senators and Representatives have signed amicus briefs supporting a Louisiana law requiring abortionists to have admitting privileges at a hospital nearby an abortion center. Some of these supporting briefs also suggest that now is the time to reconsider Roe vs Wade as sound law. Please SIGN this petition, calling on the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down Roe vs Wade. _____________________________________________________________________________ More than 60 million Americans have been slaughtered in their mother's wombs as a result of Roe v. Wade. This activist, unconstitutional ruling in 1973 has left countless women emotionally and psychologically scarred. It was believed by many that Roe would be overturned in 1992 with Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Despite having eight Republican-appointed judges at the time, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 to uphold it. Since then, major gains have been made in the fight for life, and many lives have been saved. However, Roe v. Wade remains the law of the land, leaving millions of defenseless pre-born children vulnerable to murder. According to a 2016 study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 35% of aborted babies are African American, despite black women only making up six percent of the U.S. population. 19% of aborted babies are Hispanic. We thus again call on the court to do everything they can to end Roe vs Wade. Now is the time for pro-lifers to join together and ensure that all of God's children have a right to life. Roe v. Wade must come to an end! FOR MORE INFORMATION: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/supreme-court-strikes-down-louisiana-abortion-regulations https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/over-200-congressmen-as-us-supreme-court-to-reconsider-roe-v-wade https://www.foxnews.com/politics/congress-members-file-competing-legal-briefs-in-key-scotus-abortion-case Hide Petition Text Sign this Petition
Pro-lifers have long recognized the pain of loss of life in both abortion and miscarriage and have resources in place for those who need them.
“As members of the body of Christ, the Church, we are called to bear witness to the loss of every life, no matter how brief or small,” wrote Mary McClusky, acting as Outreach for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops in 2013. “Let us pray that our growing sensitivity to the loss of a child through miscarriage will better assist grieving parents and help them to entrust their child to God’s unfailing care and mercy.”
Share


lifesitenews--2020-11-25--Irish hospitals have become a ‘horror show,’ following abortion legalization: leading pro-lifer

Jonathan van Maren is joined by Niamh Uí Bhriain , a national pro-life leader in Ireland and the head of @ @ @ @ @ discuss horrific new events in Ireland on feticide and infanticide , two years after the @ @ @ @ @ Maren notes that pro-life leaders who were fighting against the legalization of abortion in Ireland @ @ @ @ @ been proven , unfortunately , to be right again and again and again , ” @ @ @ @ @ be when abortion comes to Ireland .

Jonathan van Maren is joined by Niamh Uí Bhriain, a national pro-life leader in Ireland and the head of the Life Institute, to discuss horrific new events in Ireland on feticide and infanticide, two years after the abortion referendum.
As Van Maren notes that pro-life leaders who were fighting against the legalization of abortion in Ireland in 2018, “have been proven, unfortunately, to be right again and again and again,” on what the consequences would be when abortion comes to Ireland.


lifesitenews--2020-11-25--Pro-life Missouri Gov. lights up State Capitol dome in purple to recognize National Adoption Month

JEFFERSON CITY , Missouri , November 25 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) – Missouri ’ s pro-life Republican Governor Mike Parson ordered the Missouri State Capitol dome and People ’ s House to be lit up in purple last weekend in recognition of National Adoption Month .
“ The dome and Governor 's Mansion will light up purple at sunset Friday and remain lit until sunrise each day through the weekend .
The color purple represents the 1,579 Missouri children and youth in foster care who are looking for a forever family , ” the Governor ’ s Nov. 18 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ca n't imagine growing up and spending their adult life without their family , ” Governor Parson said .
`` Every child deserves a family of their own to provide the love , support , and strong foundation they need .
This weekend , we light the dome and People ’ s House purple to recognize National Adoption Month and open the hearts of Missourians to these special children who dream of a life with an adoptive family.
” Pro-life advocates make the case that “ adoption is the loving option ” when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Missouri Department of Social Services Children ’ s Division states that in order to become an adoptive parent , one must : • Be at least 21 years of age • Be in good health , both physically and mentally • Be willing to participate in and complete a free training and assessment process • Be part of a professional team willing to voice perspectives and concerns • Be willing to partner with the child ’ s family Parson is known to be staunchly pro-life .
He said on Twitter last year : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Missouri the most Pro-Life state in the country !
Thanks to leaders in the House and Senate , we are one vote away from passing one of the strongest # ProLife bills in the country - standing for life , protecting women ’ s health , and advocating for the unborn.
” He made that statement shortly before he signed the landmark legislation that banned abortion after eight weeks of pregnancy , the only exception being medical emergencies ( to save the life of the mother ) .
“ Under the law , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ eight weeks – could be charged with a Class B felony punishable by five to 15 years in prison , ” according to NPR .

In spite of COVID and the ongoing election disputes, Americans will gather on Thursday to give thanks for all that they have received, and to show gratitude to God and neighbor.
In many places across the nation, however, state governors are "cracking down" on Thanksgiving by implementing additional, seemingly arbitrary limits on citizens' right to free assembly.
At the same time, these same governors are allowing Black Friday shopping to go on practically unabated, without additional restrictions than those already in place for their states' COVID response.
This kind of discrimination is wrong!
Please SIGN this petition, asking state governors not to cancel Thanksgiving while favoring Black Friday.
Here are a few examples:
In Oregon, Democratic Governor Kate Brown issued an emergency order limiting the number of people who may gather in private homes, to six, on Thanksgiving Day. But, shopping on Black Friday will go on almost unaffected, as retails establishments may remain open at a capacity of 75%.
In New York, Democratic Governor Andrew Cuomo has issued a directive limiting the number of people who may gather in a private home to ten, while Black Friday sales continue.
And, in Maryland, Republican Governor Larry Hogan 'High Visibility Compliance Units' will be deployed around the state, including state troopers being sent to all counties to strengthen enforcement of COVID regulations. Meanwhile, retail establishments remain open at a capacity of 50%.
While LifeSite believes in taking appropriate precautions for COVID especially for the elderly and those already suffering poor health, we also believe that individuals and families should be allowed to use their good sense and their own discretion rather than being coerced by the state in these matters.
Moreover, states should not be in the business of discriminating against family gatherings, like Thanksgiving, in favor of commercial pursuits, like Black Friday.
Please SIGN and SHARE this Thanksgiving Day petition, urging governors not to discriminate against family gatherings and impose greater, disproportionate COVID restrictions for Thanksgiving Day than they would for shopping on Black Friday.
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
''There is no way' to enforce COVID Thanksgiving bans, New Mexico governor admits' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/there-is-no-way-to-enforce-covid-thanksgiving-bans-new-mexico-governor-admits
'Illinois governor refuses to say whether he’ll obey Thanksgiving COVID lockdown' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/illinois-governor-refuses-to-say-whether-hell-obey-thanksgiving-covid-lockdown
'The Governor Canceled Thanksgiving. Why Not Black Friday?' - https://www.wweek.com/news/business/2020/11/18/the-governor-canceled-thanksgiving-why-not-black-friday/
**Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com


lifesitenews--2020-11-25--Google ‘shifted’ 6 million votes to Joe Biden, Democrat researcher Robert Epstein tells Tucker Carls

Google ‘shifted’ 6 million votes to Joe Biden, Democrat researcher Robert Epstein tells Tucker Carlson

November 25 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) – Google alone may be responsible for six million of the votes received by former Vice President Joe Biden in this month ’ s presidential election , a prominent tech researcher and critic of the internet giant told Fox News ’ Tucker Carlson this week .
American Institute for Behavioral Research psychologist Dr. Robert Epstein , a Democrat who stated on Tucker ’ s show that he does not support Trump , is the researcher behind estimates that Google , the company that owns the world ’ s biggest search giant plus the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ swung as many as 2.6 million votes to Democrat Hillary Clinton in 2016 , through the use of various blacklists to “ suppress information.
” On Monday , he told Carlson that his team “ had 733 field agents in three key swing states this year : Arizona , North Carolina , and Florida , and we preserved more than 500,000 ephemeral experiences , ” which constitutes “ about 30 times more data than we got in 2016.
” They found that Google search results were “ strongly biased in favor of liberals @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not true of Bing or Yahoo.
” Epstein also detailed a “ smoking gun ” they found in the form of a “ period of days when the vote reminder on Google ’ s homepage was being sent only to liberals — not one of our conservative field agents received a vote reminder during those days.
” He added that Google “ backed off ” and started sending vote reminders to everyone the same night he publicized the discrepancy , four days before the election .
“ The bottom line at the moment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that we ’ ve so far quantified , could easily have shifted at least six million votes in just one direction , ” Epstein said .
“ That ’ s the bare minimum at this point , that I ’ m confident .
The maximum we haven ’ t even begun to estimate that yet because we have so much data to look at.
” For years , conservatives have argued that Google has a left-wing bias and discriminates against conservative groups .
Various leaked private conversations show not only that the dominant @ @ @ @ @ @ @ step with the general public , but that the company is willing to enforce those ideologies through its ostensibly neutral services and platforms .
Arguably the most damning of those conversations was a “ TGIF ” ( Thank God It ’ s Friday ) meeting from days after the 2016 election , which leaked in September 2018 .
During that event , various top Google officials openly discussed making Trump ’ s first victory , in the words of Senior Vice President for Global Affairs and Chief Legal Officer Kent Walker , no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ hiccup ” in a moral arc of history bend [ ing ] towards progress.
” In the video , Google co-founder Sergey Brin raised the question of how Google can ensure a “ better quality of governance and decision-making , ” while Chief Financial Officer Ruth Porat told the audience that Google would “ use the great strength and resources and reach we have to continue to advance really important values.
” Among the examples discussed in the video were making “ investments in machine learning ” and “ conversation AI ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disinformation ” and “ fake news.
” Most media outlets have called the presidential election for Biden , though Trump ’ s lawyers claim they have identified more than double the number of questionable ballots necessary to prove Trump the legitimate winner .
Litigation is ongoing .

November 25, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – Google alone may be responsible for six million of the votes received by former Vice President Joe Biden in this month’s presidential election, a prominent tech researcher and critic of the internet giant told Fox News’ Tucker Carlson this week.
American Institute for Behavioral Research psychologist Dr. Robert Epstein, a Democrat who stated on Tucker’s show that he does not support Trump, is the researcher behind estimates that Google, the company that owns the world’s biggest search giant plus the top video platform YouTube, may have swung as many as 2.6 million votes to Democrat Hillary Clinton in 2016, through the use of various blacklists to “suppress information.”
On Monday, he told Carlson that his team “had 733 field agents in three key swing states this year: Arizona, North Carolina, and Florida, and we preserved more than 500,000 ephemeral experiences,” which constitutes “about 30 times more data than we got in 2016.” They found that Google search results were “strongly biased in favor of liberals and Democrats,” which was “not true of Bing or Yahoo.”
Epstein also detailed a “smoking gun” they found in the form of a “period of days when the vote reminder on Google’s homepage was being sent only to liberals — not one of our conservative field agents received a vote reminder during those days.” He added that Google “backed off” and started sending vote reminders to everyone the same night he publicized the discrepancy, four days before the election.
— Article continues below Petition — STATES: Stop election certification while fraud investigations continue Show Petition Text 30673 have signed the petition. Let's get to 35000 ! Thank you for signing this petition! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Country... State... Sign this Petition In a bombshell press conference, President Trump's legal team has revealed evidence of alleged massive voter fraud in several constituencies key to election victory in 2020. Appealing to every American, Rudy Giuliani, Team Trump's lead counsel, said: "Joe Biden is in the lead because of invalid and illegal ballots. Give us an opportunity to prove it in court, and we will." Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition asking state legislators, IN EVERY U.S. STATE, not to allow election certification of their state until all of the evidence has been ruled on and every legal challenge exhausted. This is not about President Trump or former Vice President Biden...at this stage, our republic and the integrity of our elections literally hang in the balance. The claims of voter fraud made by Team Trump were very alarming, but here are some of the worst: The lack of oversight and security of mail-in ballots;
Direction by some election officials to election workers to violate election statutes;
The eviction of Republican observers who were kept away from inspecting ballots in some cities;
Instances of 'overvoting', where more ballots were cast in some precincts than registered voters;
The arrival of thousands of ballots - all marked for Biden - at one count center, in the middle of the night And, all of the these claims are backed-up by sworn affidavits of people who allegedly witnessed these fraudulent actions take place. Please CLICK HERE to read LifeSiteNews' article detailing the evidence of alleged voter fraud brought to light by Team Trump. And please CLICK HERE to see an example of overvoting, also alluded to by Giuiliani as having occurred in Michigan. Then, please SIGN and SHARE this petition asking ALL 50 STATE LEGISLATURES to wait till all claims of voter fraud have been investigated and litigated before certifying the election results for their states. Thank you for helping to see that justice is served and that all alleged wrongdoing can be brought to light. Thank you for helping to secure our republic. **Photo Credit: Screen capture from live press conference streamed on LifeSite Hide Petition Text Sign this Petition
“The bottom line at the moment is that these manipulations, the ones that we’ve so far quantified, could easily have shifted at least six million votes in just one direction,” Epstein said. “That’s the bare minimum at this point, that I’m confident. The maximum we haven’t even begun to estimate that yet because we have so much data to look at.”
For years, conservatives have argued that Google has a left-wing bias and discriminates against conservative groups. Various leaked private conversations show not only that the dominant ideologies at Google are dramatically out of step with the general public, but that the company is willing to enforce those ideologies through its ostensibly neutral services and platforms.
Arguably the most damning of those conversations was a “TGIF” (Thank God It’s Friday) meeting from days after the 2016 election, which leaked in September 2018. During that event, various top Google officials openly discussed making Trump’s first victory, in the words of Senior Vice President for Global Affairs and Chief Legal Officer Kent Walker, no more than a “blip” or “hiccup” in a moral arc of history bend[ing] towards progress.”
In the video, Google co-founder Sergey Brin raised the question of how Google can ensure a “better quality of governance and decision-making,” while Chief Financial Officer Ruth Porat told the audience that Google would “use the great strength and resources and reach we have to continue to advance really important values.” Among the examples discussed in the video were making “investments in machine learning” and “conversation AI” to help combat so-called “misinformation, disinformation” and “fake news.”
Most media outlets have called the presidential election for Biden, though Trump’s lawyers claim they have identified more than double the number of questionable ballots necessary to prove Trump the legitimate winner. Litigation is ongoing.
Share


lifesitenews--2020-11-25--Trump approves early steps of Biden White House transition, but says he’s not done fighting

November 25 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) – Though Donald Trump has not yet conceded the presidency to Joe Biden , his administration has taken initial steps to cooperate with the transition of power , an apparent gesture of magnanimity even as the current president ’ s legal challenge continues .
U.S. General Services Administration ( GSA ) Administrator Emily Murphy formally notified Biden on November 23 that she was releasing limited transition funds to him .
In the letter , Murphy stresses that she “ was never directly or indirectly pressured by any Executive Branch official ” to delay @ @ @ @ @ @ @ did “ receive threats online , by phone , and by mail directed at my safety , my family , my staff , and even my pets in an effort to coerce me into making this determination prematurely.
” Trump endorsed Murph ’ s move , stressing that it does not mean he is conceding the election .
“ Our case STRONGLY continues , we will keep up the good fight , and I believe we will prevail !
” he said .
“ Nevertheless , in the best interest of our Country @ @ @ @ @ @ @ her team do what needs to be done with regard to initial protocols , and have told my team to do the same.
” As part of the presumptive transition , Biden has received a government domain for a transition website , BuildBackBetter.gov , and will begin receiving the classified presidential daily briefing from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence .
The website lists Biden ’ s priorities as curbing COVID-19 ( including urging state and local authorities to force mask-wearing in their jurisdictions ) , economic recovery ( with little @ @ @ @ @ @ @ racial equality ( including the creation of a “ national police oversight commission ” ) , and climate change ( primarily via a dramatic increase in government spending ) Most media outlets have called the presidential election for Biden , though Trump ’ s lawyers claim they have identified more than double the number of questionable ballots necessary to prove Trump the legitimate winner .
Litigation is ongoing .

Trump endorsed Murph’s move, stressing that it does not mean he is conceding the election.
November 25, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – Though Donald Trump has not yet conceded the presidency to Joe Biden, his administration has taken initial steps to cooperate with the transition of power, an apparent gesture of magnanimity even as the current president’s legal challenge continues.
U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) Administrator Emily Murphy formally notified Biden on November 23 that she was releasing limited transition funds to him. In the letter, Murphy stresses that she “was never directly or indirectly pressured by any Executive Branch official” to delay the process, while noting that she did “receive threats online, by phone, and by mail directed at my safety, my family, my staff, and even my pets in an effort to coerce me into making this determination prematurely.”
NEW: GSA letter @GSAEmily to Hon. Joseph R. Biden, Jr. releasing limited funds “in connection with a presidential transition” + lays out multiple threats (family, staff + even pets) to “coerce me into making this determination prematurely” + “To be clear, I did not receive any pic.twitter.com/hfRH7eXKLv — Catherine Herridge (@CBS_Herridge) November 23, 2020
Trump endorsed Murph’s move, stressing that it does not mean he is conceding the election. “Our case STRONGLY continues, we will keep up the good fight, and I believe we will prevail!” he said. “Nevertheless, in the best interest of our Country, I am recommending that Emily and her team do what needs to be done with regard to initial protocols, and have told my team to do the same.”
…fight, and I believe we will prevail! Nevertheless, in the best interest of our Country, I am recommending that Emily and her team do what needs to be done with regard to initial protocols, and have told my team to do the same. — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 23, 2020
As part of the presumptive transition, Biden has received a government domain for a transition website, BuildBackBetter.gov, and will begin receiving the classified presidential daily briefing from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
The website lists Biden’s priorities as curbing COVID-19 (including urging state and local authorities to force mask-wearing in their jurisdictions), economic recovery (with little in the way of specifics), racial equality (including the creation of a “national police oversight commission”), and climate change (primarily via a dramatic increase in government spending)
Most media outlets have called the presidential election for Biden, though Trump’s lawyers claim they have identified more than double the number of questionable ballots necessary to prove Trump the legitimate winner. Litigation is ongoing.
Share


lifesitenews--2020-11-25--Liberal Democrat legal scholar Alan Dershowitz defends Trump’s lawyers

Big Tech is censoring us .
Subscribe to our email list and bookmark LifeSiteNews.com to continue getting our news .
Subscribe now .
November 25 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) — As Democrats push to disbar Trump ’ s lawyers for participating in “ frivolous lawsuits ” and using the “ courts to assault public confidence in the United States electoral system , ” a renowned legal scholar who describes himself as a liberal democrat has called this attack on the lawyers “ McCarthyism pure and simple.
” In a November 18 article for the Gatestone Institute , Alan Dershowitz @ @ @ @ @ @ @ civil rights lawyer who served on Donald Trump ’ s impeachment defense team , explained the Trump legal team ’ s strategy and defended its legal legitimacy .
Dershowitz wrote that he does not think it likely that the president will be able to get the 270 electoral college votes necessary to secure a victory , but that it is in the realm of possibility that Biden will be denied 270 electoral votes due to the Trump team ’ s legal efforts .
Saying that Trump “ has only one road to victory @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at this moment seems unlikely , ” Dershowitz explained that the legal strategy being pursued by the President ’ s lawyers is to ensure that not enough electors will be certified to grant either side a victory when they are set to meet on December 14 .
Calling this strategy a “ long shot , ” he said that it “ requires , for its success , a perfect storm of favorable court decisions , favorable actions by several secretaries of state , and favorable numbers from recounts and other challenges .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one state , even Pennsylvania .
There would have to be more than 35 electors not certified in time to vote .
That is unlikely in the extreme , but it is theoretically possible.
” If the Trump team ’ s strategy were to succeed , the House of Representatives will vote for president by state delegations , with one vote for each state .
This would favor the Republican incumbent since “ there are more states with a majority of Republican representatives.
” Dershowitz emphasized that he was neither endorsing nor condemning @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as a constitutional scholar and noting that it is a legitimate method to proceed .
“ Lawyers are entitled to advocate all reasonable and ethically permissible strategies that serve the interest of their client , ” he wrote .
“ That is what President Trump ’ s lawyers are doing .
They are , of course , obliged to operate within the rules of law and ethics , but I see no evidence that they are not doing so.
” Dershowitz wrote the piece in response to an email he received “ demanding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ the disbarment of Trump ’ s lawyers because they have the chutzpah to bring lawsuits , ” he said on his podcast .
“ Isn ’ t that just plain , ordinary , old fashioned McCarthyism ?
” he asked .
“ Going after the lawyers because you don ’ t like the client or you don ’ t like the fact that the lawyers are aggressively pursuing the client ’ s political interests ?
No , that ’ s not the way we do it in America , ” he continued @ @ @ @ @ @ @ piece , Rep. Bill Pascrell ( D-NJ ) has filed a complaint with the bars of several states calling for the disbarment of Rudy Giuliani and 22 other lawyers .
Before defending the president during his impeachment trial , Dershowitz had been part of Harvey Weinstein ’ s , Julian Assange ’ s , and Jeffrey Epsteins legal teams , among others .
Help stop voter fraud : Project Veritas is accepting voter fraud tips here .

Big Tech is censoring us. Subscribe to our email list and bookmark LifeSiteNews.com to continue getting our news. Subscribe now.
November 25, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — As Democrats push to disbar Trump’s lawyers for participating in “frivolous lawsuits” and using the “courts to assault public confidence in the United States electoral system,” a renowned legal scholar who describes himself as a liberal democrat has called this attack on the lawyers “McCarthyism pure and simple.”
In a November 18 article for the Gatestone Institute, Alan Dershowitz, the former Harvard law professor and civil rights lawyer who served on Donald Trump’s impeachment defense team, explained the Trump legal team’s strategy and defended its legal legitimacy.
Dershowitz wrote that he does not think it likely that the president will be able to get the 270 electoral college votes necessary to secure a victory, but that it is in the realm of possibility that Biden will be denied 270 electoral votes due to the Trump team’s legal efforts.
Saying that Trump “has only one road to victory” requiring “a perfect storm that at this moment seems unlikely,” Dershowitz explained that the legal strategy being pursued by the President’s lawyers is to ensure that not enough electors will be certified to grant either side a victory when they are set to meet on December 14.
Calling this strategy a “long shot,” he said that it “requires, for its success, a perfect storm of favorable court decisions, favorable actions by several secretaries of state, and favorable numbers from recounts and other challenges. It would not be enough to win any one state, even Pennsylvania. There would have to be more than 35 electors not certified in time to vote. That is unlikely in the extreme, but it is theoretically possible.”
If the Trump team’s strategy were to succeed, the House of Representatives will vote for president by state delegations, with one vote for each state. This would favor the Republican incumbent since “there are more states with a majority of Republican representatives.”
Dershowitz emphasized that he was neither endorsing nor condemning this strategy, but rather analyzing it as a constitutional scholar and noting that it is a legitimate method to proceed.
“Lawyers are entitled to advocate all reasonable and ethically permissible strategies that serve the interest of their client,” he wrote. “That is what President Trump’s lawyers are doing. They are, of course, obliged to operate within the rules of law and ethics, but I see no evidence that they are not doing so.”
Dershowitz wrote the piece in response to an email he received “demanding” him to sign a petition regarding “the disbarment of Trump’s lawyers because they have the chutzpah to bring lawsuits,” he said on his podcast.
“Isn’t that just plain, ordinary, old fashioned McCarthyism?” he asked. “Going after the lawyers because you don’t like the client or you don’t like the fact that the lawyers are aggressively pursuing the client’s political interests? No, that’s not the way we do it in America,” he continued.
— Article continues below Petition — STATES: Stop election certification while fraud investigations continue Show Petition Text 30673 have signed the petition. Let's get to 35000 ! Thank you for signing this petition! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Country... State... Sign this Petition In a bombshell press conference, President Trump's legal team has revealed evidence of alleged massive voter fraud in several constituencies key to election victory in 2020. Appealing to every American, Rudy Giuliani, Team Trump's lead counsel, said: "Joe Biden is in the lead because of invalid and illegal ballots. Give us an opportunity to prove it in court, and we will." Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition asking state legislators, IN EVERY U.S. STATE, not to allow election certification of their state until all of the evidence has been ruled on and every legal challenge exhausted. This is not about President Trump or former Vice President Biden...at this stage, our republic and the integrity of our elections literally hang in the balance. The claims of voter fraud made by Team Trump were very alarming, but here are some of the worst: The lack of oversight and security of mail-in ballots;
Direction by some election officials to election workers to violate election statutes;
The eviction of Republican observers who were kept away from inspecting ballots in some cities;
Instances of 'overvoting', where more ballots were cast in some precincts than registered voters;
The arrival of thousands of ballots - all marked for Biden - at one count center, in the middle of the night And, all of the these claims are backed-up by sworn affidavits of people who allegedly witnessed these fraudulent actions take place. Please CLICK HERE to read LifeSiteNews' article detailing the evidence of alleged voter fraud brought to light by Team Trump. And please CLICK HERE to see an example of overvoting, also alluded to by Giuiliani as having occurred in Michigan. Then, please SIGN and SHARE this petition asking ALL 50 STATE LEGISLATURES to wait till all claims of voter fraud have been investigated and litigated before certifying the election results for their states. Thank you for helping to see that justice is served and that all alleged wrongdoing can be brought to light. Thank you for helping to secure our republic. **Photo Credit: Screen capture from live press conference streamed on LifeSite Hide Petition Text Sign this Petition
Since the publication of Dershowitz’ piece, Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-NJ) has filed a complaint with the bars of several states calling for the disbarment of Rudy Giuliani and 22 other lawyers.
�� I’ve just filed legal complaints with the AZ, MI, NV, NY, and PA bars against Rudy Giuliani and 22 other lawyers seeking their disbarments for filing frivolous lawsuits and trying to help Trump steal the election and dismantle democracy. pic.twitter.com/0kd3PN6q1h — Bill Pascrell, Jr. (@PascrellforNJ) November 20, 2020
Before defending the president during his impeachment trial, Dershowitz had been part of Harvey Weinstein’s, Julian Assange’s, and Jeffrey Epsteins legal teams, among others.
Help stop voter fraud: Project Veritas is accepting voter fraud tips here.
Share


lifesitenews--2020-11-25--‘My mission is Truth, my God is the Lord Jesus Christ’: Trump senior legal advisor

Big Tech is censoring us .
Subscribe to our email list and bookmark LifeSiteNews.com to continue getting our news .
Subscribe now .
November 25 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) — Jenna Ellis , senior legal advisor for Trump ’ s 2020 presidential campaign , declared her resolution to hold her ground in the face of threats and smears by Democrats following her participation in last Thursday ’ s press conference on election fraud .
“ I keep getting a barrage of threats & false accusations from Dems and ‘ reporter ’ activists , ” Ellis tweeted this morning .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Do your worst .
I ’ m not intimidated .
I won ’ t back down .
My mission is Truth , my God is the Lord Jesus Christ , and my client is the President of the United States.
” Ellis had joined Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell in a press conference on election fraud last week in which she blasted journalists for their biased coverage of the 2020 presidential election .
“ We are not trying our case in the court of public opinion .
I would strike 99 % of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would be allowed to , because of the fake news coverage you provide .
You are not unbiased jurors , ” said Ellis .
“ And until you step out of your role as a journalist and actually go into a court room , and you are a judge on a bench , that has sworn an oath to be unbiased in our separation of powers , then your opinion does not matter , ” she continued .
“ The facts matter , the truth matters , and if you are fair reporters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ appropriately and you will allow coverage of our media team here and our legal team .
If you are not willing to talk about the evidence that has been presented , then that is absolutely unacceptable for journalistic standards.
” Help stop voter fraud : Project Veritas is accepting voter fraud tips here .

Big Tech is censoring us. Subscribe to our email list and bookmark LifeSiteNews.com to continue getting our news. Subscribe now.
November 25, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — Jenna Ellis, senior legal advisor for Trump’s 2020 presidential campaign, declared her resolution to hold her ground in the face of threats and smears by Democrats following her participation in last Thursday’s press conference on election fraud.
“I keep getting a barrage of threats & false accusations from Dems and ‘reporter’ activists,” Ellis tweeted this morning. “My only comment is this: Do your worst. I’m not intimidated. I won’t back down. My mission is Truth, my God is the Lord Jesus Christ, and my client is the President of the United States.”
I keep getting a barrage of threats & false accusations from Dems and “reporter” activists. My only comment is this: Do your worst. I’m not intimidated. I won’t back down. My mission is Truth, my God is the Lord Jesus Christ, and my client is the President of the United States. — Jenna Ellis (@JennaEllisEsq) November 25, 2020
Ellis had joined Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell in a press conference on election fraud last week in which she blasted journalists for their biased coverage of the 2020 presidential election.
“We are not trying our case in the court of public opinion. I would strike 99% of you from the jury. And I would be allowed to, because of the fake news coverage you provide. You are not unbiased jurors,” said Ellis.
“And until you step out of your role as a journalist and actually go into a court room, and you are a judge on a bench, that has sworn an oath to be unbiased in our separation of powers, then your opinion does not matter,” she continued.
“The facts matter, the truth matters, and if you are fair reporters, you will cover that fairly and appropriately and you will allow coverage of our media team here and our legal team. If you are not willing to talk about the evidence that has been presented, then that is absolutely unacceptable for journalistic standards.”
Help stop voter fraud: Project Veritas is accepting voter fraud tips here.
Share


lifesitenews--2020-11-25--Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell have different, but complementary, goals

TORONTO , November 25 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) — When President Donald Trump ’ s lawyer Rudy Giuliani was asked about Sidney Powell by Fox News host Lou Dobbs , he explained that “ we ’ re pursuing two different theories.
” What two legal theories is he talking about ?
The Trump legal team , Giuliani said , is focused on “ misconduct of the election ” by state officials in places like Pennsylvania , Michigan , Georgia , and elsewhere , where they allowed demonstrable physical fraud to occur in big cities like Philadelphia , Detroit , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that argue Trump ’ s voters were deprived of their constitutional rights in these states .
As fellow Trump attorney Jenna Ellis noted in an appearance on Newsmax TV on Monday , the campaign ’ s strategy is to reach the Supreme Court as fast as possible .
“ We do have a very narrow window here before December 14 , ” Ellis pointed out , “ which is when the Electoral College votes , to make sure that we can get the strategy through.
” Yesterday afternoon , Giuliani asked Third Circuit @ @ @ @ @ @ @ order blocking Pennsylvania from certifying its election result .
A ruling by the Third Circuit would allow an appeal to the Supreme Court , which would provide the opportunity the Trump team is looking for to bring the election case before the Supreme Court .
The goal is to convince the justices to throw out enough fraudulent ballots to confirm that , when only legal ballots are counted , Trump was easily re-elected for a second term .
Sidney Powell has begun to lay out her case that computerized voting systems have been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this election .
Today she will file a lawsuit in Georgia alleging that the electronic voting machines were used to perpetrate widespread election fraud , and also alleging “ foreign intrusion ” in the U.S. election .
This is the “ Biblical ” lawsuit she has been talking about .
But Powell has made clear that her case against Dominion Voting Systems stretches beyond key swing states to the entire country and even beyond our borders .
Dominion Voting Systems is used in 28 states and its software in a number of others @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the 2020 election , she suggests , involved transnational actors and money from places like Venezuela , Cuba , and possibly China .
Given the scope of the case that Powell is making , it will obviously take time to assemble all the evidence .
Jenna Ellis believes that Powell has uncovered some real problems with Dominion Voting Systems and software , but that the Trump team simply doesn ’ t have time to help her develop her case .
Instead , it is focused on narrower constitutional issues .
So you see @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not working at cross purposes , but rather for a common purpose .
They are just on two different tracks .
Mayor Giuliani is intent upon showing that , if the fraudulent ballots cast in a few major cities are tossed out , that Trump handily wins re-election .
The upside of this approach , using civil lawsuits , is that Trump gets four more years .
The downside of this approach , however , is that none of those who tried to throw the election to Biden go to jail .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the next election a few years hence .
Sidney Powell is determined to ensure that this doesn ’ t happen .
She understands that those who attempted this election heist—and have probably carried out quite a few successful ones in the past , must never be allowed near a computer voting machine or ballot box ever again .
As Powell uncovers criminal wrongdoing in the days and weeks ahead , state or federal prosecutors will have to step up as well .
I would not be surprised if , early in the coming @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to look into the case she is building in order to bring criminal charges against those responsible .
There will be many .
So as Giuliani works to ensure Trump a second term , Powell works to ensure that those who tried to cheat him out of that go to jail .
President Trump obviously supports both .
Just yesterday morning he retweeted this from attorney Lin Wood : “ I have worked closely with Sidney Powell & others over recent weeks .
The lawsuit Sidney will be filing tomorrow in GA speaks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ its allegations .
Do NOT believe them .
Believe Sidney & me .
We love America & freedom .
Our enemies do not.
” As we all know by now , retweets from Trump are an endorsement .
So keep the faith , Patriots , and fight on .
For once we have a leader who wo n't desert us .
Or the Constitution .
Steven W. Mosher is the President of the Population Research Institute and the author of Bully of Asia : Why China ’ s Dream is the New Threat @ @ @ @

PETITION UPDATE (1/15/2021) -
The events of the past month, and especially the past 10 days, have shaken the faith Americans have in their elected and appoint officials.
We continue to call for investigations to be made into allegations of election fraud. Texas is in the process of prosecuting one political operative for illegal ballot harvesting, and multiple state legislatures have called for investigations, too.
However, the judiciary has severely let down the American electorate.
As we have said all along, the integrity of the election is much bigger than President Trump. Election integrity is at the heart of republican democracy, and if we don't have it, we no longer have a functioning republic.
Therefore, we continue to seek the truth for the election outcome. Perhaps that will only be known in the future when state or federal commissions are established to investigate the instances of election fraud which were witnessed and sworn to, by thousands of Americans of all political persuasions.
In the meantime, you may still sign this petition. Thank you!
___________________________________________________________________
PETITION UPDATE (12/10/20) -
On Wednesday, President Trump tweeted: "We will be INTERVENING in the Texas (plus many other states) case. This is the big one. Our Country needs a victory!"
He is referring to the lawsuit which the state of Texas has filed against Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Georgia in the Supreme Court over changes those states made to their election rules, claiming they violated the U.S. Constitution in the process.
Here is the central part of the argument: if Texas were to allow possible voter fraud to go unchecked in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Georgia, it would be akin to committing fraud upon the people of Texas, who cast their ballots within the framework of the law.
Indeed, this would apply equally to all citizens who voted within the framework of the law across the United States!
President Trump also tweeted that this case is, "very strong...ALL CRITERIA MET."
Please continue to SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition, now.
____________________________________________________________________
PETITION UPDATE (12/7/20) - Since this petition was launched, President Trump's legal team, as well as other concerned citizens, have discovered what appears to be irrefutable evidence of voter fraud in several of the key battleground states, and have initiated legal challenges in six states.
While the situation continues to evolve, this remains a hugely important petition which we encourage you to SIGN and SHARE.
Below, please WATCH and READ about the mounting evidence of voter fraud and how the mainstream media seem determined to ignore even the most egregious instances of vote tampering. Then, please SIGN and SHARE this petition.
'Trump: ‘Our election system is now under assault and siege’ and as president I must defend it'
'Tens of thousands 2020 election votes illegally scanned in Detroit, says Dominion IT contractor'
'Trump campaign files lawsuit demanding ‘a new statewide election for president’ in Georgia'
'Experts flag over 500k ballots in PA with new evidence of major 2020 election voter fraud'
''Smoking gun'? Pennsylvania vote fraud hearing gets gasps from audience'
'FBI and Justice Department have dragged their feet investigating 2020 vote fraud'
''CNN top brass in leaked tape: We won't give Trump 'too much of a platform on his not conceding'
'Twitter censored Trump 63 times over Thanksgiving holiday, Biden untouched'
LifeSite supports President Trump with this petition because we believe he is trying to defend the Constitution, ensuring that electoral fraud does not taint the result of the 2020 general election.
But, since starting this petition, we have launched a separate petition related to the disputed election outcome, calling on the Department of Justice to 'do their job' and engage in meaningful investigations of the mounting evidence of voter fraud.
We believe that conducting forensic audits of ballots and voting machines, as well as issuing subpoenas to collect more evidence, would be a good start.
Thankfully, some of the state started to demand investigations independent of federal agencies. But we still believe that the DoJ needs to use its enormous fact-finding resources to help resolve allegations of election fraud.
Thank you for continuing to SIGN and SHARE all our election-related petitions.
_____________________________________________________________________
Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition which calls on all Americans to Stand With President Trump as he uses every legitimate means to find out if voter fraud played any role in the election outcome.
Amid allegations of voter fraud, and at a time when the situation with COVID has been used by many of the states to facilitate the use of mail-in ballots on a massive scale, we need to be very careful in dismissing the possibility of voter fraud.
The fact is, the possibility of wide-spread fraud with mail-in ballots is significant.
But, this is not about Donald Trump or Joe Biden! This about whether or not the sanctity of the ballot box has been tampered with!
Please Stand With President Trump as he attempts to defend the integrity of this election, as well as well as the right to vote itself!
Indeed, this is so important, not so much because one election hangs in the balance, but because our democracy, itself, hangs in the balance.
Americans not only have a right to know, but should demand that every legitimate means be used to discover the truth about these elections!
Please SIGN this petition and Stand With President Trump to ensure that these elections were conducted freely and fairly!
While most all Americans believe in playing by the rules, we also know that some very devious, politically-motivated operatives have been trying to harm the Trump administration from before he even took the oath of office.
This fact should lead us to question how some allegations of voter fraud can be so easily dismissed by state election authorities.
We demand to know the truth, and, for the sake of our democracy, we demand that President Trump keep fighting to learn the truth.
Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this petition today!
**Photo Credit: Shealah Craighead / White House / Flickr


lifesitenews--2020-11-25--Lubbock City Council voted against pro-life ‘sanctuary city’ ordinance, but citizens will have final

Lubbock City Council voted against pro-life ‘sanctuary city’ ordinance, but citizens will have final say

November 25 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) – The City Council of one of the largest cities in Texas has voted against an ordinance outlawing abortion within their city limits .
On November 17th , 2020 , the city council of Lubbock , Texas , sitting at a population of 278,831 , voted unanimously against the proposed ordinance which would have made the city the 17th and largest city in the nation to outlaw abortion .
The effort to see abortion outlawed in the city became most publicized in August when three Lubbock-area members of the Texas Legislature sent a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Lubbock to enact an ordinance that would outlaw abortion within their city limits in an effort to prevent abortions from happening by the opening of Planned Parenthood in Lubbock , Texas .
The Lubbock City Council reached out to the Olson & Olson law firm out of Houston , Texas for outside legal assistance in the review of the ordinance which had been presented to them by their state lawmakers .
This caused problems , however , when pro-life activists throughout the State of Texas immediately recognized the law firm as a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Parenthood .
Four major pro-life organizations throughout the State of Texas have spoken out on these concerning ties including Right To Life of East Texas , West Texas For Life , Pro-Life Waco , and Texas Right To Life .
Before the Mayor and City Council had even met in a private meeting with Olson & Olson , the leaders of the City of Lubbock had already made public statements against the ordinance .
After their private meeting with Olson & Olson , who unsurprisingly stood against the ordinance , the position of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to remain unchanged .
As far as they were concerned , the Sanctuary Cities for the Unborn ordinance was unconstitutional .
Knowing they had no other option , seven Lubbock residents began a process allowed by the Lubbock City Charter known as Initiative and Referendum .
If the seven were able to get enough verified signatures from registered voters in the City of Lubbock then the ordinance outlawing abortion would be forced to a vote by the Lubbock City Council .
If the City Council voted down the ordinance then , at that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for the citizens of Lubbock to vote to accept or reject the ordinance at the next uniform election .
Over 5,000 signatures were collected by the people of Lubbock in a period of two weeks , forcing the City Council to set a hearing and a vote on the ordinance for November 17th .
Over 150 people spoke before the Lubbock City Council at the November 17th meeting .
The majority of those who spoke on the ordinance were in favor of seeing the ordinance adopted .
Before the hearing on the ordinance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ limits , Mayor Dan Pope set strict parameters for the meeting .
“ Comments tonight are to focus on the ordinance .
We know what abortion is .
Comments that deal with what abortion is and the medical procedure are not in order and will not be a part of our public hearing tonight .
We will be discussing the merits of the ordinance.
” The first speaker at the hearing was Pastor David Rhoades of Broadview Baptist Church in Lubbock , Texas .
He immediately addressed the legal advice the City Council @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The legal advice that you received from Olson & Olson was poor and fundamentally incorrect.
” Pastor Rhoades quoted section 1.07 of the Texas Penal Code which defines an individual as , “ A human being who is alive , including an unborn child at every stage of gestation .
From fertilization until birth.
” Pastor Rhodes argued the fact that both accidental and intentional deaths of unborn individuals carried the potential for both civil and criminal penalties .
“ In addition to the Texas Penal Code , Title 10 , Chapter 22:72 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cities and counties to prohibit abortion within their jurisdictions .
Both codes in Texas establish a simple fact : There exists no legitimate legal reason to keep this city council from passing the proposed ordinance , and the fear that the City of Lubbock could be sued should be assuaged by the fact that the ACLU has withdrawn its lawsuits on this matter.
” Rhoades was correct .
In February , the ACLU ( representing the Lilith Fund and the TEA Fund ) sued seven cities in East Texas which had passed the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ abortion .
Three months later , after the cities amended their ordinances to make them even stronger , the ACLU withdrew their lawsuit .
Abortion remains banned in every city which the ACLU sued .
The lawsuits against the cities did not cost the city or taxpayers one penny .
Throughout the night the Mayor rebuked residents for addressing the issue of abortion in detail , sharing their personal stories about abortion , or sharing their faith reasons for being in favor of the ordinance outlawing abortion .
One of the residents rebuked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Gregory is a female minister who volunteers at a pregnancy resource center .
Her reason for being in support of the ordinance was rooted in her Christian beliefs .
But what she said , in Mayor Pope ’ s eyes , was worthy of this rebuke : “ We ’ ve got to stay on the ordinance .
With all due respect , this is not about your beliefs or the Lord ’ s belief , it ’ s about the ordinance .
So keep your comments to that.
” One of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ during the testimony of Shonda McCay Rodriguez .
Mayor Pope appeared to become visibly bothered when Rodriguez began to quote from Princeton University ’ s website .
The quote was on when life began .
Despite Mayor Pope ’ s quick rebuke that addressing such statements were out of order , Rodriguez defended her reasoning for talking about when life begins .
“ I am getting to the point that human life is valuable .
.
.
and I am describing where that life begins .
That is crucial to this argument.
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ We have heard that .
How many times have we heard that tonight ?
You haven ’ t talked about the ordinance yet .
You have taken me through slavery and through civil rights , Let ’ s talk about the ordinance okay ?
” Rodriguez stood firm , unwilling to yield her point .
“ Yes sir .
Those are human rights injustices and I believe that if we do not pass this ordinance then we are committing yet another human rights injustice by saying we do not value the lives @ @ @ @ @ @ @ entire point .
We need to be on the right side of justice in this case when there are so many times in history when we have not been that , and I would like as a city for us to choose that .
The citizens of Lubbock have made it glaringly obvious by the number of signatures we so quickly gathered , that we as a city stand for life and we hope you will stand with us.
” Despite the continual pushback , Lubbock residents continued to share their reasons for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the act of abortion with Lubbock ’ s city limits .
Lubbock resident Dorothy Boyett recalled having spent over 20 years ministering outside of the previous abortion facility in Lubbock .
“ I ’ ll never forget those boxes they took out at the end of the day in biohazard bags , ” said Boyett .
“ I knew what was inside and I will never forget that .
.
.
I do hope and pray you vote for the Sanctuary City for the Unborn.
” A local physician , Dr. John Thomas @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s true intention for coming to Lubbock .
“ Why they are coming here is for one purpose and for one purpose only - to kill babies , ” shared Dr. Thomas .
“ What babies do they kill ?
They are going to kill black babies , Mexican babies , and poor parent babies .
Is that a legacy to leave , Mayor and City Council ?
” Lubbock resident Jim Brown had never spoken at a City Council meeting in his entire life , but found this council meeting worthy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ testimony was riveting .
“ Are you going to stand for life or are you going to stand for death ?
Are you going to stand for right or are you going to stand for wrong ?
” Are you going to stand for good or are you going to stand for evil ?
Are you going to stand for political correctness or for moral correctness ?
I am looking into your eyes tonight because I see people with a soul and I am asking you to give these unborn children that have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ live their life too.
” While Mayor Pope and many of the Council Members claimed they were “ pro-life , ” all members of the Lubbock City Council voted against the ordinance claiming that the ordinance would violate “ Roe v. Wade ” and was , therefore , both “ unconstitutional ” and “ unenforceable.
” This response , which was shared at the end of the over 5 ½ hour public hearing , was found to disappoint and irritate many including Jim Baxa , President of West Texas for Life .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Mayor and City Council still appear to not even understand the ordinance , ” said Baxa .
Baxa explained that the Sanctuary City for the Unborn ordinance does not seek to violate Roe v. Wade , but works within Roe v. Wade .
According to Baxa , under the proposed ordinance , the immediate ban of abortion within the City of Lubbock would be immediately enforced in civil courts by private citizens , not by the State or the City .
This matter was also addressed in a letter which was given @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was signed by attorneys across the State of Texas .
The attorneys which had signed onto the letter were : Jerri Ward ( Austin , Texas ) , Kellye SoRelle ( Granbury , Texas ) , Olivia Ponce ( Marshall , Texas ) Chris Carnohan ( Abilene , Texas ) , Dustin Burrows ( Lubbock , Texas ) , Cole Shooter ( Lubbock , Texas ) , Frank G. Dobrovolny ( Jacksonville , Texas ) , Elisha M. Hollis ( Greenville , Texas ) , and Katie Nielsen ( Carthage , Texas ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Council was that Lubbock would be faced with a multitude of lawsuits that would cost a large amount of taxpayer dollars if they passed this ordinance .
However , the former Solicitor General of Texas , Jonathan F. Mitchell offered to represent the City of Lubbock at no cost to the city and at no cost to taxpayers in the event that the city be faced with legal suits as a result of the passing of the Sanctuary Cities for the Unborn ordinance .
In his speech before the City Council , Senator @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has already been said , but any expenditure of taxpayers dollars to defend this ordinance will be at the city ’ s decision .
There has been a pro-bono , very experienced attorney on this issue .
.
.
contact was provided on the front-end of when the letter requesting the ordinance was delivered .
So to be clear : There are no taxpayer dollars needed to be spent on the defense of this ordinance .
It is yall ’ s decision if that occurs.
” Councilwoman Latrelle Joy , a lawyer herself @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that having Mitchell representing Lubbock would “ be a conflict of interest , ” as she joined with other council members in expressing that they would never use any attorney recommended by Texas Right To Life .
The council did not , however , appear to think that bringing in Olson & Olson was a conflict of interests .
Even though the Mayor and City Council rejected their opportunity to outlaw abortion , the issue is far from dead in Lubbock , Texas .
Because the City Council vote was forced by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Cities for the Unborn ordinance will be appearing on the ballot at the next uniform election which , at the very latest , will be May 2021 .
If the ordinance passes , abortion will immediately be outlawed in Lubbock , Texas .
Since the controversial vote , several Lubbock residents have expressed a desire to run for Mayor or City Council , especially after statements were made by Councilwoman Latrelle Joy who publicly criticized residents for using Scripture as part of their reasoning in favor of the ordinance .
`` God 's @ @ @ @ @ @ @ square , '' said Baxa .
`` If the leaders of Lubbock believe that God does not have a place in the public square or that He has a place in the public square as long as He is subservient to them , that is a real problem and worthy of their removal from office . ''
For more information about the Sanctuary Cities for the Unborn initiative , visit www.sanctuarycitiesfortheunborn.com Mark Lee Dickson is a Director with Right to Life of East Texas , a Pastor of SovereignLOVE Church in Longview , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sanctuary Cities for the Unborn initiative .
Ryan Weathers is a student at Texas Tech University and an active member of Raiders Defending Life , a pro-life student group on the Texas Tech University Campus in Lubbock , Texas .

Even though the Mayor and City Council rejected their opportunity to outlaw abortion, the Sanctuary Cities for the Unborn ordinance will be appearing on the ballot at the next uniform election which, at the very latest, will be May 2021
November 25, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – The City Council of one of the largest cities in Texas has voted against an ordinance outlawing abortion within their city limits. On November 17th, 2020, the city council of Lubbock, Texas, sitting at a population of 278,831, voted unanimously against the proposed ordinance which would have made the city the 17th and largest city in the nation to outlaw abortion.
The effort to see abortion outlawed in the city became most publicized in August when three Lubbock-area members of the Texas Legislature sent a letter urging the Mayor and City Council of Lubbock to enact an ordinance that would outlaw abortion within their city limits in an effort to prevent abortions from happening by the opening of Planned Parenthood in Lubbock, Texas.
The Lubbock City Council reached out to the Olson & Olson law firm out of Houston, Texas for outside legal assistance in the review of the ordinance which had been presented to them by their state lawmakers. This caused problems, however, when pro-life activists throughout the State of Texas immediately recognized the law firm as a firm that had family ties to Planned Parenthood. Four major pro-life organizations throughout the State of Texas have spoken out on these concerning ties including Right To Life of East Texas, West Texas For Life, Pro-Life Waco, and Texas Right To Life.
Before the Mayor and City Council had even met in a private meeting with Olson & Olson, the leaders of the City of Lubbock had already made public statements against the ordinance. After their private meeting with Olson & Olson, who unsurprisingly stood against the ordinance, the position of the Mayor and the City Council appeared to remain unchanged. As far as they were concerned, the Sanctuary Cities for the Unborn ordinance was unconstitutional.
Knowing they had no other option, seven Lubbock residents began a process allowed by the Lubbock City Charter known as Initiative and Referendum. If the seven were able to get enough verified signatures from registered voters in the City of Lubbock then the ordinance outlawing abortion would be forced to a vote by the Lubbock City Council. If the City Council voted down the ordinance then, at that point, there would be an opportunity for the citizens of Lubbock to vote to accept or reject the ordinance at the next uniform election. Over 5,000 signatures were collected by the people of Lubbock in a period of two weeks, forcing the City Council to set a hearing and a vote on the ordinance for November 17th.
Over 150 people spoke before the Lubbock City Council at the November 17th meeting. The majority of those who spoke on the ordinance were in favor of seeing the ordinance adopted.
Before the hearing on the ordinance which would outlaw abortion within the city limits, Mayor Dan Pope set strict parameters for the meeting. “Comments tonight are to focus on the ordinance. We know what abortion is. Comments that deal with what abortion is and the medical procedure are not in order and will not be a part of our public hearing tonight. We will be discussing the merits of the ordinance.”
The first speaker at the hearing was Pastor David Rhoades of Broadview Baptist Church in Lubbock, Texas. He immediately addressed the legal advice the City Council received from Olson & Olson. ”The legal advice that you received from Olson & Olson was poor and fundamentally incorrect.” Pastor Rhoades quoted section 1.07 of the Texas Penal Code which defines an individual as, “A human being who is alive, including an unborn child at every stage of gestation. From fertilization until birth.” Pastor Rhodes argued the fact that both accidental and intentional deaths of unborn individuals carried the potential for both civil and criminal penalties. “In addition to the Texas Penal Code, Title 10, Chapter 22:72 of the Texas Government Code specifically allows cities and counties to prohibit abortion within their jurisdictions. Both codes in Texas establish a simple fact: There exists no legitimate legal reason to keep this city council from passing the proposed ordinance, and the fear that the City of Lubbock could be sued should be assuaged by the fact that the ACLU has withdrawn its lawsuits on this matter.”
Rhoades was correct. In February, the ACLU (representing the Lilith Fund and the TEA Fund) sued seven cities in East Texas which had passed the Sanctuary Cities for the Unborn ordinance outlawing abortion. Three months later, after the cities amended their ordinances to make them even stronger, the ACLU withdrew their lawsuit. Abortion remains banned in every city which the ACLU sued. The lawsuits against the cities did not cost the city or taxpayers one penny.
Throughout the night the Mayor rebuked residents for addressing the issue of abortion in detail, sharing their personal stories about abortion, or sharing their faith reasons for being in favor of the ordinance outlawing abortion. One of the residents rebuked by Mayor Pope was Marty Gregory. Gregory is a female minister who volunteers at a pregnancy resource center. Her reason for being in support of the ordinance was rooted in her Christian beliefs. But what she said, in Mayor Pope’s eyes, was worthy of this rebuke: “We’ve got to stay on the ordinance. With all due respect, this is not about your beliefs or the Lord’s belief, it’s about the ordinance. So keep your comments to that.”
One of the most heated exchanges of the night was during the testimony of Shonda McCay Rodriguez. Mayor Pope appeared to become visibly bothered when Rodriguez began to quote from Princeton University’s website. The quote was on when life began. Despite Mayor Pope’s quick rebuke that addressing such statements were out of order, Rodriguez defended her reasoning for talking about when life begins. “I am getting to the point that human life is valuable . . . and I am describing where that life begins. That is crucial to this argument.“ Visibly irritated, Mayor Pope responded, “We have heard that. How many times have we heard that tonight? You haven’t talked about the ordinance yet. You have taken me through slavery and through civil rights, Let’s talk about the ordinance okay?”
Rodriguez stood firm, unwilling to yield her point. “Yes sir. Those are human rights injustices and I believe that if we do not pass this ordinance then we are committing yet another human rights injustice by saying we do not value the lives of the unborn. That is my entire point. We need to be on the right side of justice in this case when there are so many times in history when we have not been that, and I would like as a city for us to choose that. The citizens of Lubbock have made it glaringly obvious by the number of signatures we so quickly gathered, that we as a city stand for life and we hope you will stand with us.”
Despite the continual pushback, Lubbock residents continued to share their reasons for wanting to see the ordinance pass outlawing the act of abortion with Lubbock’s city limits.
Lubbock resident Dorothy Boyett recalled having spent over 20 years ministering outside of the previous abortion facility in Lubbock. “I’ll never forget those boxes they took out at the end of the day in biohazard bags,” said Boyett. “I knew what was inside and I will never forget that . . . I do hope and pray you vote for the Sanctuary City for the Unborn.”
A local physician, Dr. John Thomas addressed what he believed was Planned Parenthood’s true intention for coming to Lubbock. “Why they are coming here is for one purpose and for one purpose only – to kill babies,” shared Dr. Thomas. “What babies do they kill? They are going to kill black babies, Mexican babies, and poor parent babies. Is that a legacy to leave, Mayor and City Council?”
Lubbock resident Jim Brown had never spoken at a City Council meeting in his entire life, but found this council meeting worthy of his attendance. Brown’s testimony was riveting. “Are you going to stand for life or are you going to stand for death? Are you going to stand for right or are you going to stand for wrong?” Are you going to stand for good or are you going to stand for evil? Are you going to stand for political correctness or for moral correctness? I am looking into your eyes tonight because I see people with a soul and I am asking you to give these unborn children that have a soul at conception the right to live their life too.”
While Mayor Pope and many of the Council Members claimed they were “pro-life,” all members of the Lubbock City Council voted against the ordinance claiming that the ordinance would violate “Roe v. Wade” and was, therefore, both “unconstitutional” and “unenforceable.” This response, which was shared at the end of the over 5 ½ hour public hearing, was found to disappoint and irritate many including Jim Baxa, President of West Texas for Life. “They have had over three months and the Mayor and City Council still appear to not even understand the ordinance,” said Baxa.
Baxa explained that the Sanctuary City for the Unborn ordinance does not seek to violate Roe v. Wade, but works within Roe v. Wade. According to Baxa, under the proposed ordinance, the immediate ban of abortion within the City of Lubbock would be immediately enforced in civil courts by private citizens, not by the State or the City.
This matter was also addressed in a letter which was given to the Mayor and City Council which was signed by attorneys across the State of Texas.
The attorneys which had signed onto the letter were: Jerri Ward (Austin, Texas), Kellye SoRelle (Granbury, Texas), Olivia Ponce (Marshall, Texas) Chris Carnohan (Abilene, Texas), Dustin Burrows (Lubbock, Texas), Cole Shooter (Lubbock, Texas), Frank G. Dobrovolny (Jacksonville, Texas), Elisha M. Hollis (Greenville, Texas), and Katie Nielsen (Carthage, Texas).
The attorneys wrote:
Mayor Pope and several city council members have been asserting that the proposed ordinance violates the federal Constitution, but they are mistaken. Abortion is not a constitutional right, and there is no language anywhere in the Constitution that even remotely suggests that anti-abortion laws are unconstitutional. Although the Supreme Court invented a right to abortion in Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), the Court’s holding merely prevents states or localities from enforcing abortion bans until Roe is overruled. It does not prevent states or localities from enacting abortion bans, so long as the city’s enforcement of its ban is delayed until the Supreme Court overrules Roe. The proposed ordinance is consistent with Roe because it specifically prohibits the city or its officials from enforcing the ordinance until they obtain a declaratory judgment from a court that the enforcement of the ordinance will comport with Supreme Court precedent. Instead, the ordinance allows the abortion ban to be enforced only through private citizen suits, and enforcement mechanisms of that sort will not expose the city to any liability. See Okpalobi v. Foster, 244 F.3d 405, 426-29 (5th Cir 2001) (en banc).
Another concern of the Lubbock City Council was that Lubbock would be faced with a multitude of lawsuits that would cost a large amount of taxpayer dollars if they passed this ordinance. However, the former Solicitor General of Texas, Jonathan F. Mitchell offered to represent the City of Lubbock at no cost to the city and at no cost to taxpayers in the event that the city be faced with legal suits as a result of the passing of the Sanctuary Cities for the Unborn ordinance. In his speech before the City Council, Senator Charles Perry was clear, “It has already been said, but any expenditure of taxpayers dollars to defend this ordinance will be at the city’s decision. There has been a pro-bono, very experienced attorney on this issue . . . contact was provided on the front-end of when the letter requesting the ordinance was delivered. So to be clear: There are no taxpayer dollars needed to be spent on the defense of this ordinance. It is yall’s decision if that occurs.” Councilwoman Latrelle Joy, a lawyer herself, specifically addressed this matter by saying that having Mitchell representing Lubbock would “be a conflict of interest,” as she joined with other council members in expressing that they would never use any attorney recommended by Texas Right To Life. The council did not, however, appear to think that bringing in Olson & Olson was a conflict of interests.
Even though the Mayor and City Council rejected their opportunity to outlaw abortion, the issue is far from dead in Lubbock, Texas. Because the City Council vote was forced by the Initiative and Referendum process, the Sanctuary Cities for the Unborn ordinance will be appearing on the ballot at the next uniform election which, at the very latest, will be May 2021. If the ordinance passes, abortion will immediately be outlawed in Lubbock, Texas.
Since the controversial vote, several Lubbock residents have expressed a desire to run for Mayor or City Council, especially after statements were made by Councilwoman Latrelle Joy who publicly criticized residents for using Scripture as part of their reasoning in favor of the ordinance.
“God's word has a place in the public square,” said Baxa. “If the leaders of Lubbock believe that God does not have a place in the public square or that He has a place in the public square as long as He is subservient to them, that is a real problem and worthy of their removal from office.”
For more information about the Sanctuary Cities for the Unborn initiative, visit www.sanctuarycitiesfortheunborn.com
Mark Lee Dickson is a Director with Right to Life of East Texas, a Pastor of SovereignLOVE Church in Longview, Texas, and the founder of the Sanctuary Cities for the Unborn initiative.
Ryan Weathers is a student at Texas Tech University and an active member of Raiders Defending Life, a pro-life student group on the Texas Tech University Campus in Lubbock, Texas.
Share


lifesitenews--2020-11-25--John Kerry: Biden presidency would advance globalist ‘Great Reset’ with ‘speed’

Big Tech is censoring us .
Subscribe to our email list and bookmark LifeSiteNews.com to continue getting our news .
Subscribe now .
November 25 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) — Former U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry has assured the elites of the World Economic Forum ( WEF ) that a Joe Biden presidency would quickly advance the globalist “ Great Reset ” agenda “ with greater speed and greater intensity than many might imagine.
” Kerry made his remarks on Tuesday last week during a virtual “ COVID Action Platform ” panel discussion hosted by the WEF .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the pandemic to introduce radical changes to the world economy .
According to James Delingpole of Breitbart News , “ COVID-19 has provided the perfect pretext ” to usher in “ a globalist takeover ” of virtually every aspect of human life .
“ Put simply , ” Delingpole writes , the Great Reset “ is the blueprint for a complete transformation of the world economy .
There will be no money , no private property , no democracy .
Instead , every key decision — what you do for a living @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whether you can take a vacation — will [ be ] decided for you by a remote , unaccountable elite of ‘ experts.
’ ” Kerry , who has been named by Joe Biden as his special presidential envoy for climate earlier this week , affirmed this central agenda of the WEF in his comments .
“ The notion of a reset is more important than ever before , ” he said .
“ I personally believe … we ’ re at the dawn of an extremely exciting time.
” Although Breitbart reports @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the United States about 1.1 million jobs , Kerry asserted rejoining it is “ not enough.
” “ I know Joe Biden believes this .
It ’ s not enough just to rejoin [ the Paris Climate Agreement ] for the United States .
It ’ s not enough for us to do just the minimum of what [ the agreement ] requires , ” he asserted .
“ The Biden administration , ” Kerry said , “ will focus on every sector of the American economy , ” including the acceleration of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” The Paris Climate Agreement not only focuses on climate change .
For pro-life and pro-family groups , the key reason to denounce the agreement was language “ designed to promote abortion and contraception , ” as Voice of the Family put it .
During his campaign , it became clear that Joe Biden was aligning his campaign platform with the WEF ’ s “ Great Reset.
” He used the same slogan — “ Build Back Better ” — and confidently used sweeping policy language including his referring to the coronavirus phenomenon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fundamentally transform the country.
” He called for “ revolutionary , institutional changes ” to the nation , involving an “ end to the era of shareholder capitalism.
” As observed by Justin Haskins of The Heartland Institute , ending “ the era of shareholder capitalism , ” is “ a major part of the Great Reset proposal that would alter how companies are evaluated , elevating social justice causes and climate change concerns over property rights.
” Indicating the rhetorical camouflaging of Marxist goals , Haskins writes , “ Instead of worrying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ capitalism ’ argue companies should be forced to focus on ‘ stakeholders , ’ which is just another way of saying ‘ the collective.
’ ” In a recent open letter to President Donald Trump , Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò , the former Apostolic Nuncio to the U.S. , warns that “ the whole world is being threatened by a global conspiracy against God and humanity … called the Great Reset.
” These impositions , being designed by global elites , seek to “ subdue all of humanity , imposing coercive measures with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ those of entire populations.
” The presidential election still remains undecided as lawyers for the Trump campaign pursue litigation to expose and reverse a “ massive and coordinated effort ” to steal the election through vote fraud ( additional specific references here , here , and here ) .
“ We believe the American people deserve to have full transparency into all vote counting and election certification , and that this is no longer about any single election , ” he wrote .
“ This is about the integrity of our entire election @ @ @ @ @ @ @ through every aspect of the law to guarantee that the American people have confidence in our government .
I will never give up fighting for you and our nation.
” Biden ’ s rhetoric shows support for elites ’ ‘ Great Reset ’ to usher in New World Order How massive voter fraud was facilitated in three swing states : Pennsylvania , Georgia , and Nevada

‘I personally believe … we’re at the dawn of an extremely exciting time,’ Joe Biden’s special presidential envoy for climate said.
Big Tech is censoring us. Subscribe to our email list and bookmark LifeSiteNews.com to continue getting our news. Subscribe now.
November 25, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — Former U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry has assured the elites of the World Economic Forum (WEF) that a Joe Biden presidency would quickly advance the globalist “Great Reset” agenda “with greater speed and greater intensity than many might imagine.”
Kerry made his remarks on Tuesday last week during a virtual “COVID Action Platform” panel discussion hosted by the WEF. The globalist organization has embraced the occasion of the pandemic to introduce radical changes to the world economy.
According to James Delingpole of Breitbart News, “COVID-19 has provided the perfect pretext” to usher in “a globalist takeover” of virtually every aspect of human life.
“Put simply,” Delingpole writes, the Great Reset “is the blueprint for a complete transformation of the world economy. There will be no money, no private property, no democracy. Instead, every key decision — what you do for a living, how much stuff you consume, whether you can take a vacation — will [be] decided for you by a remote, unaccountable elite of ‘experts.’”
Kerry, who has been named by Joe Biden as his special presidential envoy for climate earlier this week, affirmed this central agenda of the WEF in his comments. “The notion of a reset is more important than ever before,” he said. “I personally believe … we’re at the dawn of an extremely exciting time.”
Although Breitbart reports that the Paris Climate Agreement would cost the United States about 1.1 million jobs, Kerry asserted rejoining it is “not enough.”
“I know Joe Biden believes this. It’s not enough just to rejoin [the Paris Climate Agreement] for the United States. It’s not enough for us to do just the minimum of what [the agreement] requires,” he asserted.
“The Biden administration,” Kerry said, “will focus on every sector of the American economy,” including the acceleration of a “transformation in the private sector.”
— Article continues below Petition — STATES: Stop election certification while fraud investigations continue Show Petition Text 30673 have signed the petition. Let's get to 35000 ! Thank you for signing this petition! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Country... State... Sign this Petition In a bombshell press conference, President Trump's legal team has revealed evidence of alleged massive voter fraud in several constituencies key to election victory in 2020. Appealing to every American, Rudy Giuliani, Team Trump's lead counsel, said: "Joe Biden is in the lead because of invalid and illegal ballots. Give us an opportunity to prove it in court, and we will." Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition asking state legislators, IN EVERY U.S. STATE, not to allow election certification of their state until all of the evidence has been ruled on and every legal challenge exhausted. This is not about President Trump or former Vice President Biden...at this stage, our republic and the integrity of our elections literally hang in the balance. The claims of voter fraud made by Team Trump were very alarming, but here are some of the worst: The lack of oversight and security of mail-in ballots;
Direction by some election officials to election workers to violate election statutes;
The eviction of Republican observers who were kept away from inspecting ballots in some cities;
Instances of 'overvoting', where more ballots were cast in some precincts than registered voters;
The arrival of thousands of ballots - all marked for Biden - at one count center, in the middle of the night And, all of the these claims are backed-up by sworn affidavits of people who allegedly witnessed these fraudulent actions take place. Please CLICK HERE to read LifeSiteNews' article detailing the evidence of alleged voter fraud brought to light by Team Trump. And please CLICK HERE to see an example of overvoting, also alluded to by Giuiliani as having occurred in Michigan. Then, please SIGN and SHARE this petition asking ALL 50 STATE LEGISLATURES to wait till all claims of voter fraud have been investigated and litigated before certifying the election results for their states. Thank you for helping to see that justice is served and that all alleged wrongdoing can be brought to light. Thank you for helping to secure our republic. **Photo Credit: Screen capture from live press conference streamed on LifeSite Hide Petition Text Sign this Petition
The Paris Climate Agreement not only focuses on climate change. For pro-life and pro-family groups, the key reason to denounce the agreement was language “designed to promote abortion and contraception,” as Voice of the Family put it.
During his campaign, it became clear that Joe Biden was aligning his campaign platform with the WEF’s “Great Reset.” He used the same slogan — “Build Back Better” — and confidently used sweeping policy language including his referring to the coronavirus phenomenon as an “incredible opportunity … to fundamentally transform the country.” He called for “revolutionary, institutional changes” to the nation, involving an “end to the era of shareholder capitalism.”
As observed by Justin Haskins of The Heartland Institute, ending “the era of shareholder capitalism,” is “a major part of the Great Reset proposal that would alter how companies are evaluated, elevating social justice causes and climate change concerns over property rights.”
Indicating the rhetorical camouflaging of Marxist goals, Haskins writes, “Instead of worrying about profits, opponents of ‘shareholder capitalism’ argue companies should be forced to focus on ‘stakeholders,’ which is just another way of saying ‘the collective.’”
In a recent open letter to President Donald Trump, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, the former Apostolic Nuncio to the U.S., warns that “the whole world is being threatened by a global conspiracy against God and humanity … called the Great Reset.” These impositions, being designed by global elites, seek to “subdue all of humanity, imposing coercive measures with which to drastically limit individual freedoms and those of entire populations.”
The presidential election still remains undecided as lawyers for the Trump campaign pursue litigation to expose and reverse a “massive and coordinated effort” to steal the election through vote fraud (additional specific references here, here, and here).
On November 7, President Donald Trump issued a statement pledging to initiate litigation.
“We believe the American people deserve to have full transparency into all vote counting and election certification, and that this is no longer about any single election,” he wrote. “This is about the integrity of our entire election process … We will pursue this process through every aspect of the law to guarantee that the American people have confidence in our government. I will never give up fighting for you and our nation.”
RELATED
Abp. Viganò warns Trump about ‘Great Reset’ plot to ‘subdue humanity,’ destroy freedom
Biden’s rhetoric shows support for elites’ ‘Great Reset’ to usher in New World Order
Watch President Trump’s legal team hold press conference on voter fraud live HERE
In battleground states, Democrats sought policies to undermine election integrity
Voter fraud concerns surface over sudden, unexpected Biden jump in Wisconsin, Michigan
How massive voter fraud was facilitated in three swing states: Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Nevada
Time Magazine announces ‘The Great Reset’ to usher in world socialism
Share