lifesitenews--2020-12-04--Pfizer COVID jab warning: No breastfeeding, avoid pregnancy for 2 months, unknown fertility impacts

WESTMINSTER , England , December 4 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) — Government produced safety instructions for a new coronavirus vaccine indicate that it should not be used by pregnant or breast-feeding mothers and children .
In addition , they state that it is unknown what effect the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine will have on fertility .
The ten-page “ Reg 174 Information for UK Healthcare Professionals ” describes the vaccine , how it is to be stored , diluted , and administered , and the trial studies carried out to test it .
To be effective , the vaccine is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a section called “ Fertility , pregnancy and lactation , ” the guide says there is “ no or limited data ” on the vaccine .
Therefore , it is not recommending its use for pregnant women .
“ Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed .
COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy , ” the guide states in section 4.6 .
“ For women of childbearing age , pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination.
” The guide also advises that women should avoid becoming pregnant for the first @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ In addition , women of childbearing age should be advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose , ” it says .
Because it is still unknown whether or not the vaccine can be transmitted to a breast-feeding infant through his or her mother ’ s milk , the instructions state that “ a risk to the newborns/infants can not be excluded.
” Therefore , the guide specifies that the vaccine “ should not be used during breast-feeding.
” But alarmingly the guide has only one thing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ impact on fertility : they don ’ t know if it does or doesn ’ t .
“ It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 has an impact on fertility , ” it states .
The guide notes that the safety of the vaccine was tested in two clinical studies .
The first study enrolled 60 people aged 16 to 55 , and the second involved “ approximately ” 44,000 people aged 12 and older .
The most common negative effects of the vaccine in people over the age of 16 have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” ( a muscle ) , experienced by over 80 % , fatigue ( over 60 % ) , headache ( over 50 % ) , sore muscles ( over 30 % ) , chills ( over 30 % ) , joint pain ( over 20 % ) , and fever ( over 10 % ) .
According to the guide , these side-effects “ were usually mild or moderate in intensity ” and went away after a few days .
Earlier this week , two leading doctors wrote to the European Medicine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ safety of vaccines , in an attempt to stop human trials of all Covid-19 vaccines , especially the Pfizer/BioNtech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 described above .
Dr. Michael Yeadon , a former head of Pfizer ’ s respiratory research , and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg , a health policy advisor , think that human testing is still unethical .
Among other concerns , Yeadon and Wodart warn that some of the vaccines may prevent the safe development of placentas in pregnant women , resulting in “ vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile.
” “ Several @ @ @ @ @ @ @ formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2 , ” the doctors wrote .
“ Syncytin-1 [ … ] which is derived from human endogenous retroviruses ( HERV ) and is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy , is also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses , ” they continued .
“ There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies .
However @ @ @ @ @ @ @ case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile.
” The doctors suggest that because the Pfizer/BioNTech trial protocol says that “ women of child-bearing potential ” can take part only if they are not pregnant or breastfeeding and are using contraception , it could take “ a relatively long time before a noticeable number of cases of post-vaccination infertility could be observed.
” According to the U.K. ’ s Independent newspaper , Pfizer , the owner of the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ United Kingdom , which means that people who suffer damage from the vaccine will not be able to sue the company .
“ NHS ( National Health Service ) staff providing the vaccine , as well as manufactures of the drug , are also protected , ” the Independent reported .
The newspaper also reported that the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine was authorised by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency on Tuesday under Section 174 of the Human Medicine Regulations 2012 .
The regulation , which was altered by the British government this autumn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prohibitions ” in Britain ’ s requirements for authorization “ do not apply where the sale or supply of a medicinal product is authorized by the licensing authority on a temporary basis in response to the suspected or confirmed spread of— ( a ) pathogenic agents ; ( b ) toxins ; ( c ) chemical agents ; or ( d ) nuclear radiation , which may cause harm to human beings.
” The Independent noted that in a press conference on Wednesday , Pfizer ’ s U.K. managing director refused to explain @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ We ’ re not actually disclosing any of the details around any of the aspects of that agreement and specifically around the liability clauses , ” said Pfizer ’ s Ben Osborn .
Curiously , in October the government ’ s Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency ( MHRA ) , posted a bid request stating that “ For reasons of extreme urgency , ” they seek “ an Artificial Intelligence ( AI ) software tool to process the expected high volume of Covid-19 vaccine Adverse Drug Reaction ( ADRs ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ explain that “ it is not possible to retrofit the MHRA ’ s legacy systems to handle the volume of ADRs that will be generated by a Covid-19 vaccine , ” and that this “ represents a direct threat to patient life and public health.
” UK approves Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine , will begin roll out next week Former Pfizer VP : ‘ No need for vaccines , ’ ‘ the pandemic is effectively over ’ Pfizer coronavirus vaccine must be stored at -70°C – ‘ colder than Antarctica

A safety instructions document published by the UK government states 'For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination'
WESTMINSTER, England, December 4, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — Government produced safety instructions for a new coronavirus vaccine indicate that it should not be used by pregnant or breast-feeding mothers and children. In addition, they state that it is unknown what effect the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine will have on fertility.
The ten-page “Reg 174 Information for UK Healthcare Professionals” describes the vaccine, how it is to be stored, diluted, and administered, and the trial studies carried out to test it. To be effective, the vaccine is supposed to be administered twice. In a section called “Fertility, pregnancy and lactation,” the guide says there is “no or limited data” on the vaccine. Therefore, it is not recommending its use for pregnant women.
“Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy,” the guide states in section 4.6.
“For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination.”
The guide also advises that women should avoid becoming pregnant for the first two months after their Covid-19 shots.
“In addition, women of childbearing age should be advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose,” it says.
Because it is still unknown whether or not the vaccine can be transmitted to a breast-feeding infant through his or her mother’s milk, the instructions state that “a risk to the newborns/infants cannot be excluded.” Therefore, the guide specifies that the vaccine “should not be used during breast-feeding.”
But alarmingly the guide has only one thing to say about the vaccine’s impact on fertility: they don’t know if it does or doesn’t.
“It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 has an impact on fertility,” it states.
The guide notes that the safety of the vaccine was tested in two clinical studies. The first study enrolled 60 people aged 16 to 55, and the second involved “approximately” 44,000 people aged 12 and older. The most common negative effects of the vaccine in people over the age of 16 have been “pain at the injection site” (a muscle), experienced by over 80%, fatigue (over 60%), headache (over 50%), sore muscles (over 30%), chills (over 30%), joint pain (over 20%), and fever (over 10%). According to the guide, these side-effects “were usually mild or moderate in intensity” and went away after a few days.
— Article continues below Petition — SIGN: Join petition calling for a stop to COVID vaccine testing in Europe Show Petition Text 16601 have signed the petition. Let's get to 17500 ! Thank you for signing this petition! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Country... State... Sign this Petition Concerns over the health and safety of the human test subjects in Pfizer's European COVID vaccine study have caused two eminent doctors to launch a petition calling for an immediate halt to those studies. On December 1, 2020, Dr. Michael Yeadon, an ex chief of research at Pfizer and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a lung specialist and former department head of public health lodged an appeal to the EMA, the European Medicine Agency responsible for approving drugs across the EU, asking them to suspend the ongoing Pfizer/BioNtech COVID vaccine study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42). LifeSite is joining Drs. Yeadon and Wodarg in their call for an immediate suspension of this study and we are encouraging people to co-sign their petition to the EMA which is to be found in the petition section on this page. Please SIGN and SHARE this important petition, and then please contact the EMA at the address listed below, in the 'For More Information' section. In their application to the EMA, Drs. Yeadon and Wodarg give the following reasons why the Pfizer study could pose dangers to the health and safety of the study participants: First, the doctors say that the study design must be improved as the highly inaccurate PCR test is currently being used to detect the presence of COVID in the study participants. This means that the efficacy of the vaccine is in doubt. The doctors recommend changing from the PCR test to Sanger sequencing.
Second, and more important, the doctors advocate animal testing of the vaccine to exclude the possibility of the risks to the life and health of human participants from known side-effects of other similar studies on corona viruses. These side-effects can include: an exaggerated immune response when the subject comes into contact with the "real world" virus; possible infertility of an "indefinite duration" for women; severe allergic responses to polyethylene glycol which is contained in the mRNA vaccine being tested by Pfizer; and, other latent, serious side effects which, because of the short duration of the study, may only become known well after the conclusion of the study. Because of these unacceptable risks to the life and health of the Pfizer/BioNtech COVID vaccine study participants, we are joining with Drs. Yeadon and Wodarg as co-signers of their petition to the European Medicine Agency, asking for an immediate halt to these studies. Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING, today! And, after you have signed this petition, please send the sample email in the section below to the official European Medicine Agency email: [email protected] FOR MORE INFORMATION: Actual Petition Text (pdf): https://2020news.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Wodarg_Yeadon_EMA_Petition_Pfizer_Trial_FINAL_01DEC2020_EN_unsigned_with_Exhibits.pdf Sample Email: Subject: Please act on the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon and stay the Phase III clinical trial(s) of BNT162b Dear Sir or Madam, I am hereby co-signing the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon to support their urgent request to stay the Phase III clinical trial(s) of BNT162b (EudraCT Number 2020-002641-42) and other clinical trials. The full text of the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon can be found here: https://2020news.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Wodarg_Yeadon_EMA_Petition_Pfizer_Trial_FINAL_01DEC2020_EN_unsigned_with_Exhibits.pdf I hereby respectfully request that EMA act on the petition of Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon immediately. Regards, [Your name] **Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com Hide Petition Text Sign this Petition
Fertility fears
Earlier this week, two leading doctors wrote to the European Medicine Agency, which is responsible for the safety of vaccines, in an attempt to stop human trials of all Covid-19 vaccines, especially the Pfizer/BioNtech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 described above. Dr. Michael Yeadon, a former head of Pfizer’s respiratory research, and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a health policy advisor, think that human testing is still unethical.
Among other concerns, Yeadon and Wodart warn that some of the vaccines may prevent the safe development of placentas in pregnant women, resulting in “vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile.”
“Several vaccine candidates are expected to induce the formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2,” the doctors wrote.
“Syncytin-1 […] which is derived from human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) and is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy, is also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses,” they continued.
“There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile.”
The doctors suggest that because the Pfizer/BioNTech trial protocol says that “women of child-bearing potential” can take part only if they are not pregnant or breastfeeding and are using contraception, it could take “a relatively long time before a noticeable number of cases of post-vaccination infertility could be observed.”
Pfizer can’t be sued for damages
According to the U.K.’s Independent newspaper, Pfizer, the owner of the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 has been given indemnity in the United Kingdom, which means that people who suffer damage from the vaccine will not be able to sue the company.
“NHS (National Health Service) staff providing the vaccine, as well as manufactures of the drug, are also protected,” the Independent reported.
The newspaper also reported that the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine was authorised by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency on Tuesday under Section 174 of the Human Medicine Regulations 2012.
The regulation, which was altered by the British government this autumn, currently states that the ordinary “prohibitions” in Britain’s requirements for authorization “do not apply where the sale or supply of a medicinal product is authorized by the licensing authority on a temporary basis in response to the suspected or confirmed spread of— (a) pathogenic agents; (b) toxins; (c ) chemical agents; or (d) nuclear radiation, which may cause harm to human beings.”
The Independent noted that in a press conference on Wednesday, Pfizer’s U.K. managing director refused to explain why the company needed this legal protection.
“We’re not actually disclosing any of the details around any of the aspects of that agreement and specifically around the liability clauses,” said Pfizer’s Ben Osborn.
Curiously, in October the government’s Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), posted a bid request stating that “For reasons of extreme urgency,” they seek “an Artificial Intelligence (AI) software tool to process the expected high volume of Covid-19 vaccine Adverse Drug Reaction (ADRs).” The bid goes on to explain that “it is not possible to retrofit the MHRA’s legacy systems to handle the volume of ADRs that will be generated by a Covid-19 vaccine,” and that this “represents a direct threat to patient life and public health.”
Related
UK approves Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, will begin roll out next week
Former Pfizer VP: ‘No need for vaccines,’ ‘the pandemic is effectively over’
Pfizer coronavirus vaccine must be stored at -70°C – ‘colder than Antarctica
Share


lifesitenews--2020-12-04--Twitter censors UNESCO declaration stressing need to consent to medical intervention

December 4 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) — Twitter has marked as “ potentially sensitive content ” a screenshot of Article 6 of the 2005 UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights , which states that “ medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior , free and informed consent of the person concerned.
” A Twitter user posted Article 6 of the document in response to a video clip of U.K .
Member of Parliament Desmond Swayne ’ s impassioned admonition against coerced vaccines .
Swayne said that such coercion would “ set the seal on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ most authoritarian since the Commonwealth of the 1650s.
” “ And now we discover that a vaccination may be a passport to the acquisition of your civil liberties , ” Swayne continued .
“ And without which you would have all sorts of things that you would be able to do , denied to you .
Can I say that that would be absolutely disproportionate to a virus with a mortality rate of verging on 1 percent ?
It would equally be a terrible precedent to set for other vaccines and medicines.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ We ’ ve got to pay attention to implicit coercion , and that is , if the government turns a blind eye to allowing businesses like airlines and restaurants to refuse to let people in unless they ’ ve had the vaccination , the government ’ s got to decide whether it ’ s willing to allow people to discriminate on that basis.
” Swayne replied , “ Discrimination .
It would be vaccinationism !
Which we must of course , resist !
” Dr. Michael Yeadon , former Vice President for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is developing a COVID-19 vaccine , quoted this tweet screenshot of Article 6 of the document , saying , “ This is inalienable & must not be pushed aside .
It will not be.
” Yeadon wrote in an October article , “ There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic .
You do not vaccinate people who aren ’ t at risk from a disease .
You also don ’ t set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Social media giants have been notorious for their politically biased “ fact-checking ” and outright censorship of posts , and even social media users themselves , for sharing information they deem to be incorrect , misleading , or harmful .
Big tech has been particularly aggressive towards posts which question vaccines .
In a lawsuit filed against Facebook , Children ’ s Health Defense recounted that Democratic congressman Adam Schiff “ threatened to introduce legislation to remove Facebook ’ s immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act unless Facebook implemented algorithms @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine misinformation ’ and advertising.
” Facebook announced yesterday that it will “ start removing false claims ” about COVID-19 vaccines “ that have been debunked by public health experts ” on Facebook , as well as Instagram , which is part of Facebook .
Earlier this year , Facebook revealed that in March alone , the company “ displayed warnings on about 40 million posts related to COVID-19 on Facebook ...
When people saw those warning labels , 95 % of the time they did not go on to view the original @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sensitive Media Policy , its “ potentially sensitive content ” warning label is meant for content which depicts graphic violence , adult content , and hateful imagery .
“ Anyone can report potential violations of this policy via our dedicated reporting flows , ” according to their policy .
“ If you don ’ t mark your media as sensitive , we will do so manually if your content is reported for review .
”

The UNESCO document excerpt was posted in support of a member of parliament’s call to resist forced vaccination.
December 4, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — Twitter has marked as “potentially sensitive content” a screenshot of Article 6 of the 2005 UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, which states that “medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned.”
A Twitter user posted Article 6 of the document in response to a video clip of U.K. Member of Parliament Desmond Swayne’s impassioned admonition against coerced vaccines. Swayne said that such coercion would “set the seal on the government’s reputation as the most authoritarian since the Commonwealth of the 1650s.”
“And now we discover that a vaccination may be a passport to the acquisition of your civil liberties,” Swayne continued. “And without which you would have all sorts of things that you would be able to do, denied to you. Can I say that that would be absolutely disproportionate to a virus with a mortality rate of verging on 1 percent? It would equally be a terrible precedent to set for other vaccines and medicines.”
Another member of parliament chimed in, “We’ve got to pay attention to implicit coercion, and that is, if the government turns a blind eye to allowing businesses like airlines and restaurants to refuse to let people in unless they’ve had the vaccination, the government’s got to decide whether it’s willing to allow people to discriminate on that basis.”
Swayne replied, “Discrimination. It would be vaccinationism! Which we must of course, resist!”
Dr. Michael Yeadon, former Vice President for Allergy & Respiratory at Pfizer, which is developing a COVID-19 vaccine, quoted this tweet screenshot of Article 6 of the document, saying, “This is inalienable & must not be pushed aside. It will not be.”
Yeadon wrote in an October article, “There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic. You do not vaccinate people who aren’t at risk from a disease. You also don’t set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn’t been extensively tested on human subjects.”
— Article continues below Petition — PETITION: No to government and corporate penalties for refusing COVID-19 vaccine Show Petition Text 103183 have signed the petition. Let's get to 125000 ! Thank you for signing this petition! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Country... State... Sign this Petition **Photo credit: Shutterstock.com Mainstream media sources are promoting offensive suggestions by some doctors that people who refuse a vaccine for COVID-19 should be "punished" by the government and by business - effectively coercing them into taking the vaccine. One group of doctors writing in 'USA Today' suggested that the government impose special taxes (i.e., fines) on people who refuse the vaccination and that business simply refuse to serve them. [see story below]
Another doctor writing in an online publication called 'The Conversation' shamelessly suggested that people who refuse a vaccine should be given a psychoactive drug to induce compliance. [see story below] But, these suggestions are plain political posturing, and have nothing to do with science or with the recent trends of the disease. And, in case they haven't noticed, we live in a democracy not a medical dictatorship! Please SIGN this urgent petition which asks policy-makers and business people, at all levels, to pledge to respect the rights of those who, in good conscience, decide not to vaccinate themselves or their children. People should not have to live in fear of governmental or corporate retribution for refusing a vaccine which is being rushed to market by Big Pharma and their fellow-travelers in NGOs, like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. It would be intolerable and immoral for the government or business to coerce someone, and their family, to take a COVID vaccine against their will to avoid a fine, or just so they can do their weekly grocery shopping. Medical freedom must be respected in principle and also in practice. So, it is now time that our policy-makers listen to all voices involved in this vital conversation, and start to represent those who will not tolerate being punished for refusing a vaccine. Simply put, legislatures must begin to act as legislatures again. Questions must be asked. Hearings and investigations must be held. And, the legislatures of each state and country must return to the business of representing the people who voted for them, assuming their rightful place as the originator of legislation. We can no longer accept the dictates of executive branches without question, especially now that, statistically speaking, the initial brunt of the COVID crisis has passed. Neither can we accept the dictates of doctors who seem detached from reality and from science, and who only seem to be attached to the idea of promoting ideas which contribute to the agrandizement of power and control of political interests, and wealth of those who stand to make a lot of money from the sale of a COVID vaccine. Please SIGN this urgent petition which asks government and business leaders to pledge to respect the rights of those who refuse a COVID vaccine, and not seek to punish them for doing so. FOR MORE INFORMATION: 'Doctors lay out plan to ‘punish’ people who refuse coronavirus vaccine: ‘There is no alternative’' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/doctors-lay-out-plan-to-punish-people-who-refuse-coronavirus-vaccine-there-is-no-alternative 'US professor: ‘Psychoactive pill’ should be covertly administered to ensure lockdown compliance' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-professor-ensure-lockdown-compliance-by-drugging-dissenters-with-psychoactive-pill Hide Petition Text Sign this Petition
Social media giants have been notorious for their politically biased “fact-checking” and outright censorship of posts, and even social media users themselves, for sharing information they deem to be incorrect, misleading, or harmful. Big tech has been particularly aggressive towards posts which question vaccines.
In a lawsuit filed against Facebook, Children’s Health Defense recounted that Democratic congressman Adam Schiff “threatened to introduce legislation to remove Facebook’s immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act unless Facebook implemented algorithms to ‘distinguish’ and suppress ‘vaccine misinformation’ and advertising.”
Facebook announced yesterday that it will “start removing false claims” about COVID-19 vaccines “that have been debunked by public health experts” on Facebook, as well as Instagram, which is part of Facebook.
Earlier this year, Facebook revealed that in March alone, the company “displayed warnings on about 40 million posts related to COVID-19 on Facebook … When people saw those warning labels, 95% of the time they did not go on to view the original content.”
According to Twitter’s Sensitive Media Policy, its “potentially sensitive content” warning label is meant for content which depicts graphic violence, adult content, and hateful imagery.
“Anyone can report potential violations of this policy via our dedicated reporting flows,” according to their policy. “If you don’t mark your media as sensitive, we will do so manually if your content is reported for review.”
RELATED
Forced COVID vaccinations violate UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
Share


lifesitenews--2020-12-04--If churches close again, Catholics need to be ready

December 4 , 2020 ( CatholicCulture.org ) — Here ’ s the question — THE question — that ’ s on my mind these days : As governors continue to impose tight restrictions on churches , when will Catholic bishops encourage civil disobedience ?
Archbishop Sample of Portland seems to have answered that question , saying it ’ s “ not going to happen.
” Archbishop Cordileone of San Francisco sends a different message : “ I ’ m taking no options off the table.
” In France , Bishop Ginoux of Montauban has gone considerably further , urging the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ It ’ s easy to ask bishops to take the lead if no one stands behind them , ” he reasons ; “ invade the churches at Mass times , ask for the Mass and bishops and priests will come to celebrate it.
” That sounds quite reasonable to me .
But there are a few practical difficulties .
Which churches should we invade ?
And what are the Mass times ?
Or should we , the lay faithful , make those decisions for ourselves : choose a church and a time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pray — for a willing priest ?
I ’ d be willing .
This is not a mere theoretical question .
I was stunned and dismayed ( “ scandalized , ” I think , is the right word ) earlier this year , when one diocese after another meekly acceded to government directives , and shut off access to the sacraments .
If it happens again I want to be ready .

UPDATE (5/21/2020) -
The Catholic bishops of Minnesota along with state’s Lutheran leaders have informed their governor that they will defy his continued lockdown order for houses of worship and will begin public religious services in time for Pentecost.
The order allows malls, shops, and other retailers to open their doors at fifty percent capacity, and allows businesses—from pet-grooming services to medical cannabis operations—to resume in-person operations...but explicitly leaves in place bans on in-person worship services for more than ten people.
The bold move was announced in separate letters sent simultaneously to Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison from Most Rev. Bernard A. Hebda, Archbishop of the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis; from the presidents of the two Lutheran Church Minnesota districts; and from the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, the attorney group working on behalf of the reopening churches.
The religious leaders chose to act in defiance of the governor after he revealed his plan last week to reopen commerce in the state while keeping in place the limit for church services to ten people or less. Weeks of dialogue with the governor aimed at achieving equal treatment for houses of worship had reportedly gone nowhere.
And, although there are more than 85 archdioceses in North America, this is a good start.
Archbishop Hebda is to be commended for his courage and action in the face of discrimination by the state government.
While the "Mall of America" and casinos were allowed to reopen by the state at 50% capacity, churches were held to just 10 people per service.
And, thus, the Archbishop rightly judged the policy to discriminate against houses of worship.
Please READ THE FULL STORY by clicking on this link.
And if you haven't already, please SIGN this petition, which ask ALL the bishops of the Church to be courageous in restoring the sacraments to their flocks.
____________________________________________________________________________
UPDATE (4/15/2020) -
In the first instance of reinstating the sacraments to the faithful in the U.S., the bishop of Las Cruces, New Mexico has lifted a diocesan ban on public Masses, stating in a letter to his priests that “depriving the faithful of the nourishment offered through the Eucharist” cannot “become the ‘status quo’ for the foreseeable future.”
Bishop Peter Baldacchino advised his priests in the April 15 letter obtained by the Catholic News Agency that they can resume offering the sacraments as long as they abide by state-order health directives.
Bishop Baldacchino stated: "While it is true that we need to take every reasonable precaution to reduce the spread of Coronavirus, it is equally true that we offer the greatest ‘essential service’ to our people."
Let us congratulate Bishop Baldacchino for this courageous step! And, let us also encourage his brother bishops to follow his example.
Thank you for continuing to SIGN this urgent and crucial petition.
_____________________________________________________________________________
Please SIGN this petition, asking our bishops to work tirelessly to find creative and safe ways to restore, to us, their flock, the sacraments through which our Blessed Lord's sanctifying graces flow.
We read in the Holy Bible: "As a shepherd tends his flock when he finds himself among his scattered sheep, so will I tend My sheep. I will rescue them from every place where they were scattered when it was cloudy and dark ... the injured I will bind up, the sick I will heal (but the sleek and the strong I will destroy) shepherding them rightly." Ezekiel 34
During the first years of his reign, one of Pope Francis' most oft-repeated words was "accompaniment."
In Evangelium Gaudii, the word was used nine times, in Amoris Laetitia, five times. In many cases, the word was used in a challenging tone and in the general context of ambiguity that has come to define the Francis pontificate. Almost always, the word was meant to challenge the traditions of the Catholic Church.
But the tradition of Holy Mother Church is one of radical accompaniment, like that of a mother who would never allow herself to be separated from her child.
Now, more than ever, immersed as we are in a world threatened by the spiritual plague of secularism and the physical plague of the Chinese coronavirus, we need our shepherds to protect and feed their flock.
Please SIGN this petition, encouraging our bishops to be fearless and creative in their administration of the sacraments.
One need not be a medical doctor or a doctor of theology to know that if outdoor physical recreation and grocery shopping is essential and can be accomplished safely during this pandemic, so, too, can the exercise of religious services.
There is a battle raging all around us in which the secular world is seeking to eliminate all signs of Christ's presence among us.
The current pandemic, like all times of crisis, can be an opportunity to be the light of the world. But make no mistake about it, the enemy of God will use a time of crisis as well. He will use it to separate men from each other and from God.
SIGN this petition to implore the bishops to use all available safe and creative means to restore the sacraments to the faithful.
Thank you!
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
'WATCH: Sick woman in hospital begs priests to courageously minister to sick, dying': https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/watch-sick-woman-in-hospital-begs-priests-to-courageously-minister-to-sick-dying
'UK Catholic bishops suggest priests shouldn’t attend to dying faithful due to coronavirus': https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/uk-catholic-bishops-suggest-priests-shouldnt-attend-to-dying-faithful-due-to-coronavirus
'Expert says it could be 18 months before church services resume: Live COVID-19 updates': https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/police-state-grows-expert-warns-america-it-could-be-18-months-before-church-services-resume
'WATCH: Priest in Italy bravely processes with Eucharist to bless coronavirus-stricken country': https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/watch-priest-in-italy-bravely-processes-with-eucharist-to-bless-coronavirus-stricken-country
'Spanish police shut down Palm Sunday Mass on church rooftop': https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/spanish-police-shut-down-palm-sunday-mass-on-church-rooftop
'Police fine priest and quarantine him for carrying crucifix through the streets': https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/police-fine-priest-and-quarantine-him-for-carrying-crucifix-through-the-streets
**Photo: Fr. Tomaso Jozef Jochemczyk processes with the Blessed Sacrament in Italy, March 20, 2020. Taken by: Sister Marie


lifesitenews--2020-12-04--Is the lockdown costing more lives than it saves?

December 4 , 2020 ( CatholicCulture.org ) — “ By staying home , we ’ re saving lives.
” How often have you heard that logic during the last several months ?
Let ’ s take a closer look at it .
If you know or even suspect that you have a highly infectious and potentially deadly disease , then of course , you should stay home ; if you ’ re out and about , you ’ re putting others at risk .
But what if there ’ s no reason to suspect that you ’ re infected with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the people who do catch the disease survive it — in most cases , without serious symptoms ?
In that case , when a productive citizen stays home , there ’ s a cost to society — a cost that can ultimately be measured in lives .
In The Price of Panic , three authors — Douglas Axe , William Brigg , and Jay Richards — try to put the Covid epidemic in perspective .
The authors do not downplay the dangers of Covid .
They simply weigh those dangers against the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which public officials have responded .
They contend : That is a bold appraisal : one virtually guaranteed to ensure that The Price of Panic is not reviewed — not even mentioned — by mainstream media outlets .
Since the lockdowns began in March , the media outlets have competed with each other to run the most sensational headlines about the rise in case counts , the most frightening stories about potential fatalities , the most exaggerated accounts of hospital overcrowding .
Bad news sells , and Covid has provided editors with a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s clickbait .
It ’ s panic-porn .
It ’ s obsessive .
The social-media giants , Facebook and Twitter and YouTube , have done their part to fan the flames , suppressing questions about the alarmist narrative .
This has been done , the gatekeepers of the internet inform us , because it is responsible to suppress dissent in this case , because by stressing the urgency of the situation , they are saving lives .
So we ’ re back to the statement with which I began this column : We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lives .
But are we ?
That question could mean either of two things : Are we motivated by the desire to save lives ?
Are we actually saving lives ?
The Price of Panic pursues both questions .
Are public officials , when they order ever-stricter lockdown measures , motivated entirely by the desire to save lives ?
A reasonably prudent observer should notice that the lockdowns concentrate power in the hands of a few officials .
The governor decides when an emergency exists ; the governor decides what you should do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when ( if ever ) the emergency has ended .
The governor , in short , has an awful lot of power as long as the epidemic rages .
And how many people , having tasted power , want to renounce it ?
For that matter , how many politicians , having ordered drastic public policies , want to admit that they have failed ?
The lockdown policies have been ordered by governors and mayors on the basis of suggestions from public-health officials .
Can we reasonably expect those public-health officials , and/or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they chose wrongly ?
The lockdown began because public-health officials predicted an unprecedented disaster .
We ’ ll never know what might have happened if our political leaders had declined to impose harsh restrictions on society ( although we might look to Sweden , and learn some interesting lessons ) .
But we do know that the “ expert ” predictions have been consistently wrong .
The authors of The Price of Panic observe that under some circumstances — such as the ones prevailing today — prophets pay no penalty for inaccurate predictions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ right he was , no one wanted to hear what Elijah had to say .
No one thanked him when the prophesied drought came to pass .
Being wrong in the right direction , though , often reaps reward .
Early pandemic models indicated that only prompt and massive state action could save us .
The models were wrong — way off — but they were wrong in the right direction .
They gave politicians justification for taking over almost every aspect of citizens ’ lives .
They gave the press clickbait galore @ @ @ @ @ @ @ negative — the competition to provide bad news — discouraged the sort of “ wait a minute ” skepticism that might have made the “ experts ” uneasy , and led political leaders to hesitate about following their advice .
Early in 2019 , the World Health Organization ( WHO ) was advising that “ non-pharmaceutical public health measures ” like lockdowns and social distancing and masks and contact tracing would have “ limited ” use in fighting a flu-type epidemic .
As recently as February — just a few weeks before the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the US tweeted : “ Seriously , people — STOP BUYING MASKS !
They are NOT effective in preventing general public from catching # coronavirus , but if healthcare providers can ’ t get them to care for sick patients , it puts them and our communities at risk !
” Those advisories are now “ inoperative ” —to use a term made famous by the embattled Nixon White House .
But the lockdowns continue .
And when lockdowns and testing fail to stop the spread of the virus , officials order tighter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ back just for a moment , and ask about the effectiveness of these measures , is to risk public censure .
But The Price of Panic takes the risk , and concludes : “ Whether we compare countries or US states , the virus seemed indifferent to government-mandated lockdowns.
” There really isn ’ t much evidence at all that lockdowns are saving lives .
There is abundant evidence , on the other hand , that the lockdowns have imposed immense costs on society .
The economic costs — the businesses going bankrupt @ @ @ @ @ @ @ firms destroyed — are unmistakable .
Slightly less obvious , but more frightening , are the costs to people with medical problems not related to Covid .
The authors challenge us : Still more difficult to measure , yet still more deadly , are the emotional and psychological costs of the lockdown .
We don ’ t know how many elderly people have died alone , desolate in their rooms in nursing homes because they could not see their children .
We don ’ t know how many lonely people will be weeping @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Thanksgiving dinner with their families .
But we do know that deaths associated with loneliness and depression , such as suicides and drug overdoses , have soared this year .
The lockdown is costing lives — more surely than it is saving lives .
So if we are all “ staying home to save lives , ” we ’ re making a deadly mistake .

There really isn’t much evidence at all that lockdowns are saving lives. There is abundant evidence, on the other hand, that the lockdowns have imposed immense costs on society.
December 4, 2020 (CatholicCulture.org) — “By staying home, we’re saving lives.” How often have you heard that logic during the last several months? Let’s take a closer look at it.
If you know or even suspect that you have a highly infectious and potentially deadly disease, then of course, you should stay home; if you’re out and about, you’re putting others at risk. But what if there’s no reason to suspect that you’re infected with the disease? What if 99% of the people who do catch the disease survive it — in most cases, without serious symptoms? In that case, when a productive citizen stays home, there’s a cost to society — a cost that can ultimately be measured in lives.
In The Price of Panic, three authors — Douglas Axe, William Brigg, and Jay Richards — try to put the Covid epidemic in perspective. The authors do not downplay the dangers of Covid. They simply weigh those dangers against the undoubted costs of the draconian measures with which public officials have responded. They contend:
This virus triggered panic long before it compared to any other global catastrophe… Never before had scores of countries around the world chosen to perform such economic harikari in unison.
That is a bold appraisal: one virtually guaranteed to ensure that The Price of Panic is not reviewed — not even mentioned — by mainstream media outlets. Since the lockdowns began in March, the media outlets have competed with each other to run the most sensational headlines about the rise in case counts, the most frightening stories about potential fatalities, the most exaggerated accounts of hospital overcrowding. Bad news sells, and Covid has provided editors with a bonanza of bad news. It’s clickbait. It’s panic-porn. It’s obsessive.
The social-media giants, Facebook and Twitter and YouTube, have done their part to fan the flames, suppressing questions about the alarmist narrative. This has been done, the gatekeepers of the internet inform us, because it is responsible to suppress dissent in this case, because by stressing the urgency of the situation, they are saving lives. So we’re back to the statement with which I began this column: We’re doing these things to save lives.
But are we? That question could mean either of two things: Are we motivated by the desire to save lives? Are we actually saving lives? The Price of Panic pursues both questions.
Are public officials, when they order ever-stricter lockdown measures, motivated entirely by the desire to save lives? A reasonably prudent observer should notice that the lockdowns concentrate power in the hands of a few officials. The governor decides when an emergency exists; the governor decides what you should do during an emergency; the governor decides when (if ever) the emergency has ended. The governor, in short, has an awful lot of power as long as the epidemic rages. And how many people, having tasted power, want to renounce it?
For that matter, how many politicians, having ordered drastic public policies, want to admit that they have failed? The lockdown policies have been ordered by governors and mayors on the basis of suggestions from public-health officials. Can we reasonably expect those public-health officials, and/or those elected politicians, to admit that they chose wrongly?
— Article continues below Petition — PETITION: No to mask mandates Show Petition Text 116233 have signed the petition. Let's get to 125000 ! Thank you for signing this petition! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Country... State... Sign this Petition PETITION UPDATE (8/27/2020) Thank you for continuing to SIGN and SHARE this petition, which asks policymakers at all levels of government to reverse mandatory mask orders within their borders. Facebook has restored the share link for this petition, saying that the decision to block it was a 'mistake...' Please share with your Facebook friends, but we should all take heed of this warning: when an organization or individuals have to beg, plead and cajole just to express objective truths, it may be time to start looking for other social networking platforms. Facebook needs to treat its users with respect, no matter their political persuasion. Moreover, Facebook needs to treat objective reality and facts with more respect. One-size-fits-all oppressive government mask mandates must stop! Healthy adults and children should not be forced - by the state - to wear masks when the risk of infection is low and the benefit of wearing a mask is highly questionable. ________________________________________________________________________________________ PETITION UPDATE (8/25/2020) Facebook is actively censoring this petition, saying that some people find it 'abusive.' How anyone could find alternate facts about oppressive mask mandates 'abusive' is incredible...that is, impossible to believe. This is exactly the kind of censorship which Big Tech is getting a bad reputation for. The fact that Facebook calls differing opinion and objective reality "abusive" says a lot about Facebook and their agenda to silence reason and logic, not just conservatives and Christians. But, people are more intelligent than Facebook give them credit for. And, the more this continues, the more reasonable people will look alternate platforms to share their thoughts and connect with their friends and family. The more that happens, the less revenue Facebook will generate. All of us have a decision to make, and the time is coming where we might have to tell our Facebook friends that we are moving to another platform. We are encouraging people to continue SIGNING this petition and SHARING it via other platforms such as Parler and Gab, and to share the link below with your family and friends on Whatsapp, Telegram, Threema and Signal. Thank you! ________________________________________________________________________________________ One-size-fits-all oppressive government mask mandates must stop! Healthy adults and children should not be forced - by the state - to wear masks when the risk of infection is low and the benefit of wearing a mask is highly questionable. Please SIGN this petition which asks policymakers at all levels of government to reverse mandatory mask mandates within their borders. Public health policies should be based on science and logic, not on the type of political posturing and virtue-signaling which led Joe Biden to recently call for a national mask mandate. And, public health policies certainly shouldn't lead to a situation where more people could become sick. But, that is exactly what these mandatory mask mandates are doing. Here are four inconvenient facts about masks: 1) Masks** are largely ineffective at stopping the transmission of viruses. The vast majority of masks worn by the public are made from material which cannot filter-out viruses because virus particles are too small to catch or obstruct. Wearing cloth masks to stop a virus is like putting a bee in a bird cage to keep it from flying away. Wearing a mask for long periods of time ensures that the wearer has a warm and moist receptacle around his or her mouth, on which viruses and bacteria can land and accumulate. Thus, masks are actually likely to have little effect in stopping the spread of COVID-19 acting as a barrier, but could actually make things worse acting as a receptacle. 2) Mandates which call for masks to be worn outdoors are both absurd and oppressive. 3) There are clearly documented hazards of wearing masks for long periods of time. 4) And, since school is on everyone's mind... Notwithstanding the above information on the ineffectiveness of most masks against viruses, we don't know if asymptomatic children can even transmit the virus. But, it was a reported in an article in the July 21, 2020 Uk Times that: "There has been no recorded case of a teacher catching the coronavirus from a pupil anywhere in the world, according to one of the UK government's leading scientific advisers." And, we also know that children are extremely unlikely to get seriously ill or die from COVID infections. In any case, children cannot possibly be expected to wear a mask properly in a way that would cut transmission. There are still a lot of unknowns about COVID-19, but we have grown in our understanding of this disease since the beginning of the crisis. The knowledge we have gained should allow government and health authorities to make more nuanced policies than the current one-size-fits-all mask mandates. Where are the legislative hearings in county commissions, and state, provincial or federal legislatures before these drastic actions are mandated? Where are the open and transparent debates among experts that provide our representatives with the necessary information to make good policy decisions? The real pandemic is the panic and the resulting tyranny that is being caused by dictatorial governors, corporate media and the monopolistic Big Tech. The truth is that COVID-19 is like a bad cold for most people; this is not ebola or the plague. Of course, the very elderly and those with serious health conditions should take precautions or be quarantined, but the rest of society should begin the long process of returning to normality. The frenzy to force everyone to wear a mask, at all times, has gone beyond all comprehension, and goes against science and logic. Please SIGN this petition which asks policymakers at all levels of government to reverse any mandatory mask order within the borders of their county, state, province, or country. Thank you! FOR MORE INFORMATION: 'Explosion in mandatory masking isn’t driven by science, but fear', PART I - https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/explosion-in-mandatory-masking-isnt-driven-by-science-but-fear 'Explosion in mandatory masking isn’t driven by science, but fear', PART II - https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/explosion-in-mandatory-masking-isnt-driven-by-science-but-fear-part-ii OSHA Document on Surgical Masks and Respirators stating that surgical masks do NOT prevent airborne particles (e.g. viruses) from being inhaled - https://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3219.pdf 'PETER HITCHENS: Face masks turn us into voiceless submissives - and it’s not science forcing us to wear them, it’s politics' - https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8537489/PETER-HITCHENS-Face-masks-turn-voiceless-submissives.html **Here, we are referring to the masks worn by the vast majority of the public, not to specialist masks or respirator-type masks. ***Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com Hide Petition Text Sign this Petition
The lockdown began because public-health officials predicted an unprecedented disaster. We’ll never know what might have happened if our political leaders had declined to impose harsh restrictions on society (although we might look to Sweden, and learn some interesting lessons). But we do know that the “expert” predictions have been consistently wrong. The authors of The Price of Panic observe that under some circumstances — such as the ones prevailing today — prophets pay no penalty for inaccurate predictions:
Elijah predicted a drought… However right he was, no one wanted to hear what Elijah had to say. No one thanked him when the prophesied drought came to pass. Being wrong in the right direction, though, often reaps reward. Early pandemic models indicated that only prompt and massive state action could save us. The models were wrong — way off — but they were wrong in the right direction. They gave politicians justification for taking over almost every aspect of citizens’ lives. They gave the press clickbait galore.
The constant drive to accentuate the negative — the competition to provide bad news — discouraged the sort of “wait a minute” skepticism that might have made the “experts” uneasy, and led political leaders to hesitate about following their advice. Early in 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) was advising that “non-pharmaceutical public health measures” like lockdowns and social distancing and masks and contact tracing would have “limited” use in fighting a flu-type epidemic. As recently as February — just a few weeks before the lockdowns began — the Surgeon General of the US tweeted: “Seriously, people — STOP BUYING MASKS! They are NOT effective in preventing general public from catching #coronavirus, but if healthcare providers can’t get them to care for sick patients, it puts them and our communities at risk!”
Those advisories are now “inoperative”—to use a term made famous by the embattled Nixon White House. But the lockdowns continue. And when lockdowns and testing fail to stop the spread of the virus, officials order tighter lockdowns and more testing. To step back just for a moment, and ask about the effectiveness of these measures, is to risk public censure. But The Price of Panic takes the risk, and concludes: “Whether we compare countries or US states, the virus seemed indifferent to government-mandated lockdowns.”
There really isn’t much evidence at all that lockdowns are saving lives. There is abundant evidence, on the other hand, that the lockdowns have imposed immense costs on society. The economic costs — the businesses going bankrupt, the restaurants closed, the family firms destroyed — are unmistakable. Slightly less obvious, but more frightening, are the costs to people with medical problems not related to Covid. The authors challenge us:
Imagine needing hip surgery, suffering in pain for months while the hospital is half empty and your surgeon has had to furlough staff for lack of patients. Then multiply that a few million times to get some sense of the collective toll of these misguided policies.
Still more difficult to measure, yet still more deadly, are the emotional and psychological costs of the lockdown. We don’t know how many elderly people have died alone, desolate in their rooms in nursing homes because they could not see their children. We don’t know how many lonely people will be weeping this week because they could not enjoy Thanksgiving dinner with their families. But we do know that deaths associated with loneliness and depression, such as suicides and drug overdoses, have soared this year.
The lockdown is costing lives — more surely than it is saving lives. So if we are all “staying home to save lives,” we’re making a deadly mistake.
Published with permission from CatholicCulture.org.
Share


lifesitenews--2020-12-04--Join our daily worldwide rosary HERE

Join our daily worldwide rosary HERE

December 4 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) – In response to the crisis unfolding in our world and in the Church , LifeSite is offering Catholics throughout the world a chance to be united daily in prayer , in the Our Lady of Fatima Rosary Crusade .
Catholics from all over the world—from Israel , Uganda , Italy , France , Germany , Ireland , Pakistan , Singapore , the Philippines , India , Indonesia , Australia , New Zealand , Thailand , the United Kingdom , the U.S. , Canada , Brazil , and other countries—are gathering daily to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Anthony Pillari , J.C.L.
, an American priest currently studying in Italy .
Our goal is , by means of this daily rosary and by embracing and living out the message given by the Virgin Mary at Fatima , the triumph of Our Lady ’ s Immaculate Heart .
To help obtain that goal , Bishop Athanasius Schneider graciously composed the following prayer for this worldwide rosary crusade : O Immaculate Heart of Mary , you are the holy Mother of God and our tender Mother .
Look upon the distress in which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are living because of the spread of materialism and the persecution of the Church .
In Fatima you warned against these errors , as you spoke about the errors of Russia .
You are the Mediatrix of all graces .
Implore your Divine Son to grant this special grace for the Pope : that he might consecrate Russia to your Immaculate Heart , so that Russia will be converted , a period of peace will be granted to the world , and your Immaculate Heart will triumph , through an authentic renewal of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ purity of the Catholic Faith , of the sacredness of Divine worship and of the holiness of the Christian life .
O Queen of the holy Rosary and our sweet Mother , turn your merciful eyes to us and graciously hear this our trusting prayer .
Amen .
+ Athanasius Schneider , Auxiliary Bishop of the archdiocese of Saint Mary in Astana To learn more about the urgency of responding to Our Lady ’ s message at Fatima , and about what you can do , please read Cardinal Burke ’ s 2017 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ https : //voiceofthefamily.com/full-text-cardinal-burkes-historic-call-for-consecration-of-russia/ ) .
As St. Padre Pio once said , “ The rosary is the weapon for these times.
” Through prayer , God can shape history , change the world , and bring about a great time of renewal and peace for the Church and for the world , through the triumph of Our Lady ’ s Immaculate Heart .
Join us today !
If you would like to follow along with the prayers said during this rosary , you can access them via this PDF .
This document also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the daily rosary on LifeSite led by Fr .
Pillari .

(LifeSiteNews) — In response to the crisis unfolding in our world and in the Church, LifeSite is happy to promote Regina Angelorum Press’s Daily Rosary, which is offering Catholics throughout the world the chance to be united daily in prayer, in the Our Lady of Fatima Rosary Crusade.
Catholics from all over the world — from Israel, Uganda, Italy, France, Germany, Ireland, Pakistan, Singapore, the Philippines, India, Indonesia, Australia, New Zealand, Thailand, the United Kingdom, the U.S., Canada, Brazil, and other countries — are gathering daily to pray the Rosary, led by Father Pillari, JCL, MCL, STL, an American priest currently studying in Italy.
The Daily Rosary is being offered each day at 12noon EST through Regina Angelorum Press’ YouTube Channel to which you can subscribe HERE.
The goal is, by means of this Daily Rosary and by embracing and living out the message given by the Virgin Mary at Fatima, the triumph of Our Lady’s Immaculate Heart.
To help obtain that goal, Bishop Athanasius Schneider graciously composed the following prayer for this worldwide Rosary crusade:
O Immaculate Heart of Mary, you are the holy Mother of God and our tender Mother. Look upon the distress in which the Church and the whole of humanity are living because of the spread of materialism and the persecution of the Church. In Fatima you warned against these errors, as you spoke about the errors of Russia. You are the Mediatrix of all graces. Implore your Divine Son to grant this special grace for the Pope: that he might consecrate Russia to your Immaculate Heart, so that Russia will be converted, a period of peace will be granted to the world, and your Immaculate Heart will triumph, through an authentic renewal of the Church in the splendor of the purity of the Catholic Faith, of the sacredness of Divine worship and of the holiness of the Christian life. O Queen of the holy Rosary and our sweet Mother, turn your merciful eyes to us and graciously hear this our trusting prayer. Amen. + Athanasius Schneider, Auxiliary Bishop of the archdiocese of Saint Mary in Astana
To learn more about the urgency of responding to Our Lady’s message at Fatima, and about what you can do, please read Cardinal Burke’s 2017 address at the Rome Life Forum.
As St. Padre Pio once said, “The Rosary is the weapon for these times.” Through prayer, God can shape history, change the world, and bring about a great time of renewal and peace for the Church and for the world, through the triumph of Our Lady’s Immaculate Heart. Join us today!
If you would like to follow along with the prayers said during this Rosary, you can access them HERE. The document also includes a brief F.A.Q. pertaining to the daily Rosary.
You can send your prayer requests to https://reginangelorumpress.com/prayer-intentions/
Share


lifesitenews--2020-12-04--We are commissioned to share the gospel to the whole world

To help keep this and other programs on the air , please donate here .
Watch this episode of Mother @ @ @ @ @ on 10.21.2020 and re-aired on 12.4.2020 .
Today , Mother Miriam speaks about the importance @ @ @ @ @ others , which means telling them the tough truth sometimes .
We can not just @ @ @ @ @ their sin thinking we are safe as long as we know the truth .
You @ @ @ @ @ 10 am EST/7 am PST on our Facebook Page .
Never miss a show !
@ @ @ @ @ email updates here .

To help keep this and other programs on the air, please donate here.
Watch this episode of Mother Miriam's Live originally aired on 10.21.2020 and re-aired on 12.4.2020. Today, Mother Miriam speaks about the importance of spreading the gospel with others, which means telling them the tough truth sometimes. We cannot just allow others to continue in their sin thinking we are safe as long as we know the truth.
You can tune in daily at 10 am EST/7 am PST on our Facebook Page.
Never miss a show! Subscribe to Mother Miriam Live email updates here.


lifesitenews--2020-12-04--Suspicious timing as COVID restrictions flare up after sketchy 2020 election ends

Big Tech is censoring us .
Subscribe to our email list and bookmark LifeSiteNews.com to continue getting our news .
Subscribe now .
December 4 , 2020 ( American Thinker ) — Well , here we go again .
COVID-19 hysteria is peaking once more and it 's coming just days after a momentous presidential election .
What a coincidence !
Is there any possibility that this is happening because the Democrats feel the need for a big , attention-getting distraction from the stench of a fixed election ?
It is becoming very apparent that there was a mind-blowing level @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at least , to rob Donald Trump of a landslide victory .
Not the usual , criminal Democrat vote fraud , but industrial-strength , highly criminal , highly coordinated fraud .
Fraud using every known trick and what looks like a bunch of new ones , too .
The usual tricks include dead people voting , people voting multiple times , paid-for votes , miscounted votes , deleted votes , created votes , etc .
etc .
These things seem to happen every election when Democrats are in control .
This election , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vote-tabulating computer software jiggering on a massive scale .
Truckloads of ballots delivered in the middle of the night , pristine ballots for only candidate Joe Biden with printer-accuracy selection marks or machine manipulated irregular marks , large vote blocs suddenly moving from Trump to Biden , all vote blocs marking only Biden , and exactly the same percentage of votes favoring Biden versus Trump in numerous state precincts , and many other very odd anomalies .
All of this stinks and everyone knows it .
Fair-minded people know that Donald Trump 's @ @ @ @ @ @ @ masked , basement-dwelling Joe Biden 's .
Trump often had four or five events every day which drew tens-of-thousands each .
He did this day after day and he is 74 years old !
There was tremendous enthusiasm for his candidacy .
Joe Biden often drew about 10 people at his events , and sometimes voters literally ignored him .
Fortunately , they were all in their safety circles with face masks on .
Donald Trumps outstanding campaign , the success of down-ballot Republicans , and his resounding vote lead well after polls @ @ @ @ @ @ @ amazing victory .
When confronted with the Trump vote margins , Democrat web-spinners obviously said to themselves `` Whoa , Nellie ! ''
They instructed their comrades in the various swing states to stop the vote count to give time to get more Biden ballots and `` adjust '' the vote tabulating computer settings and software .
The fact that the vote counting was stopped at all and that it was done in multiple states at the same time is an obvious tip-off to coordinated fraud .
It is reported now that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are widely used in many of the swing states , have software with settings that can be altered in real-time , either locally or remotely , via the internet , and sure enough , some were hooked up to the internet .
Their computers also have built-in settings that can be altered locally to adjust the weighting of candidate votes in selected races .
This is not a sick joke .
One can only imagine the mischief ( fraud ) that is possible by fiddling with the vote totals once the ballots have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ system . ''
Josef Stalin knew the power of vote counting versus vote casting and commented on it many years ago .
Some of the very interesting things to start appearing after the election are the forensic data analyses of the voting and its patterns .
Many of the techniques are frequently used in financial and other fraud investigations .
Such things as Benford 's first-digit rule , Bernoulli trial analysis and just-plain logic and common sense reveal much that is very wrong in the vote patterns of many swing states .
Ballots @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is one indicator that pops out of the voting data .
Many private-individual data experts have performed extensive analysis and found strong evidence of manipulation .
This kind of evidence may not satisfy courtroom requirements , but it does represent billowing clouds of suspicious , dark smoke rising from the election .
Where there is smoke ...
The oddities might also be just like fingerprints at a crime scene .
Questions about the integrity of the elections started arising almost immediately after the election .
So what an appropriate time to goose-up the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people 's minds from the complexities of voting , vote counting , undecided state elections , fraud and all manner of related things .
It is much easier for people to understand a plague-like death from a horrific pandemic and the need to wear masks everywhere and at all times .
Simple ... and once masked Joe Biden is safely in the White House everything will be fine .
The pretext for the renewed hysteria is the increase in the number of `` cases '' of COVID-19 that we have now .
You @ @ @ @ @ @ @ inaccurate , ever increasing , and often over-sensitive tests that are being performed .
Tests that have produced a 'positive ' in one nostril and a 'negative ' in the other nostril on the same person .
Tests that trigger a 'positive ' when only harmless fragments of a virus are present due to overly-sensitive test thresholds .
The reality is that healthy people under about age 65 have minor or no symptoms when they test positive for the virus .
The vast majority of the population does not need to be locked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ live their lives .
Older people , especially those with health problems , need to be careful - just as they must during flu season .
The CDC recently announced that the number of people who died from the COVID-19 virus alone is less than 10,000 .
The rest of the deaths involved people with two or three other , major health problems .
The average age of the deceased is around 78 the same as it is for all other death causes .
I do n't trust any of the COVID-19 death @ @ @ @ @ @ @ positives and actual death causes that have nothing to do with the virus .
COVID deaths have been so financially incentivized that the statistics are very tainted .
Yes , testing reveals that people are getting the virus , but spreading is what viruses are very good .
There is nothing known that can stop this .
Lockdowns and masks do very little , at best .
There is no science or data that show otherwise .
Viruses must propagate through society to the point where there are no more hosts .
This @ @ @ @ @ @ @ roughly 20 % of the population is susceptible to the virus and 80 % has immunity for various reasons .
The best that can be done is to limit the viral load by maintaining distance from others and washing your hands .
Stuff people do during flu season .
By the way , do n't viruses always flare up in the fall ?
Stop the testing and case insanity and let people live their lives .
It is a struggle to comprehend what kind of people inflict such harm on their fellow citizens @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have just ratcheted up their tyrannical lock-down , shut-down , curfew and gathering edicts have .
These people are almost all Democrats .
The harm is enormous and it affects untold millions of people .
Ruined businesses , lost revenue , drug addition , domestic abuse , child abuse and suicide .
This array of social harm far outweighs any possible good that the edicts produce which is miniscule at best .
In fact , we have many months of lock-down and mask-wearing experience already .
See all the good that did ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ but tyrannical , mostly Democrat governors apparently do .
Maybe they should pay attention to their beloved WHO that recently announced that lock-downs and shut-downs really are n't such a good idea due to their immensely harmful impact on society .
However , cranking up the COVID-19 hysteria right now might just be the ticket for a timely fear-filled , distraction from massive Democrat vote fraud and criminality .
Published with permission from the American Thinker .
Help stop voter fraud : Project Veritas is accepting voter fraud tips here .

What an appropriate time to goose up the ante on the COVID-19 hysteria to distract people's minds from the complexities of voting and vote-counting.
Big Tech is censoring us. Subscribe to our email list and bookmark LifeSiteNews.com to continue getting our news. Subscribe now.
December 4, 2020 (American Thinker) — Well, here we go again. COVID-19 hysteria is peaking once more and it's coming just days after a momentous presidential election.
What a coincidence! Is there any possibility that this is happening because the Democrats feel the need for a big, attention-getting distraction from the stench of a fixed election?
It is becoming very apparent that there was a mind-blowing level of vote fraud, in several states at least, to rob Donald Trump of a landslide victory. Not the usual, criminal Democrat vote fraud, but industrial-strength, highly criminal, highly coordinated fraud. Fraud using every known trick and what looks like a bunch of new ones, too.
The usual tricks include dead people voting, people voting multiple times, paid-for votes, miscounted votes, deleted votes, created votes, etc. etc. These things seem to happen every election when Democrats are in control.
This election, however, might involve ballot creation and vote-tabulating computer software jiggering on a massive scale. Truckloads of ballots delivered in the middle of the night, pristine ballots for only candidate Joe Biden with printer-accuracy selection marks or machine manipulated irregular marks, large vote blocs suddenly moving from Trump to Biden, all vote blocs marking only Biden, and exactly the same percentage of votes favoring Biden versus Trump in numerous state precincts, and many other very odd anomalies. All of this stinks and everyone knows it.
Fair-minded people know that Donald Trump's campaign was light-years ahead of sleepy, masked, basement-dwelling Joe Biden's. Trump often had four or five events every day which drew tens-of-thousands each. He did this day after day and he is 74 years old! There was tremendous enthusiasm for his candidacy. Joe Biden often drew about 10 people at his events, and sometimes voters literally ignored him. Fortunately, they were all in their safety circles with face masks on. Donald Trumps outstanding campaign, the success of down-ballot Republicans, and his resounding vote lead well after polls closed all point to his highly-probable, amazing victory.
When confronted with the Trump vote margins, Democrat web-spinners obviously said to themselves “Whoa, Nellie!” They instructed their comrades in the various swing states to stop the vote count to give time to get more Biden ballots and “adjust” the vote tabulating computer settings and software. The fact that the vote counting was stopped at all and that it was done in multiple states at the same time is an obvious tip-off to coordinated fraud.
It is reported now that the Dominion Voting Systems computer hardware, which are widely used in many of the swing states, have software with settings that can be altered in real-time, either locally or remotely, via the internet, and sure enough, some were hooked up to the internet. Their computers also have built-in settings that can be altered locally to adjust the weighting of candidate votes in selected races. This is not a sick joke. One can only imagine the mischief (fraud) that is possible by fiddling with the vote totals once the ballots have been counted and are in the “system.” Josef Stalin knew the power of vote counting versus vote casting and commented on it many years ago.
Some of the very interesting things to start appearing after the election are the forensic data analyses of the voting and its patterns. Many of the techniques are frequently used in financial and other fraud investigations. Such things as Benford's first-digit rule, Bernoulli trial analysis and just-plain logic and common sense reveal much that is very wrong in the vote patterns of many swing states. Ballots being received before they were mailed out is one indicator that pops out of the voting data. Many private-individual data experts have performed extensive analysis and found strong evidence of manipulation. This kind of evidence may not satisfy courtroom requirements, but it does represent billowing clouds of suspicious, dark smoke rising from the election. Where there is smoke…
The oddities might also be just like fingerprints at a crime scene.
Questions about the integrity of the elections started arising almost immediately after the election.
So what an appropriate time to goose-up the ante on the COVID-19 hysteria to distract people's minds from the complexities of voting, vote counting, undecided state elections, fraud and all manner of related things. It is much easier for people to understand a plague-like death from a horrific pandemic and the need to wear masks everywhere and at all times. Simple…and once masked Joe Biden is safely in the White House everything will be fine.
The pretext for the renewed hysteria is the increase in the number of “cases” of COVID-19 that we have now. You know, the cases resulting from the inaccurate, ever increasing, and often over-sensitive tests that are being performed. Tests that have produced a 'positive' in one nostril and a 'negative' in the other nostril on the same person. Tests that trigger a 'positive' when only harmless fragments of a virus are present due to overly-sensitive test thresholds.
The reality is that healthy people under about age 65 have minor or no symptoms when they test positive for the virus. The vast majority of the population does not need to be locked down or wear masks. Let them live their lives. Older people, especially those with health problems, need to be careful – just as they must during flu season.
The CDC recently announced that the number of people who died from the COVID-19 virus alone is less than 10,000. The rest of the deaths involved people with two or three other, major health problems. The average age of the deceased is around 78 the same as it is for all other death causes. I don't trust any of the COVID-19 death statistics. They are filled with false positives and actual death causes that have nothing to do with the virus. COVID deaths have been so financially incentivized that the statistics are very tainted.
Yes, testing reveals that people are getting the virus, but spreading is what viruses are very good. There is nothing known that can stop this. Lockdowns and masks do very little, at best. There is no science or data that show otherwise. Viruses must propagate through society to the point where there are no more hosts. This is herd immunity which commonly means that roughly 20% of the population is susceptible to the virus and 80% has immunity for various reasons. The best that can be done is to limit the viral load by maintaining distance from others and washing your hands. Stuff people do during flu season. By the way, don't viruses always flare up in the fall?
Stop the testing and case insanity and let people live their lives.
It is a struggle to comprehend what kind of people inflict such harm on their fellow citizens as the governors of the states that have just ratcheted up their tyrannical lock-down, shut-down, curfew and gathering edicts have. These people are almost all Democrats. The harm is enormous and it affects untold millions of people. Ruined businesses, lost revenue, drug addition, domestic abuse, child abuse and suicide. This array of social harm far outweighs any possible good that the edicts produce which is miniscule at best. In fact, we have many months of lock-down and mask-wearing experience already. See all the good that did? Sane, thinking people don't, but tyrannical, mostly Democrat governors apparently do. Maybe they should pay attention to their beloved WHO that recently announced that lock-downs and shut-downs really aren't such a good idea due to their immensely harmful impact on society.
However, cranking up the COVID-19 hysteria right now might just be the ticket for a timely fear-filled, distraction from massive Democrat vote fraud and criminality.
Published with permission from the American Thinker.
Help stop voter fraud: Project Veritas is accepting voter fraud tips here.
Share


lifesitenews--2020-12-04--‘Smoking gun’? Pennsylvania vote fraud hearing gets gasps from audience

Big Tech is censoring us .
Subscribe to our email list and bookmark LifeSiteNews.com to continue getting our news .
Subscribe now .
December 4 , 2020 ( Family Research Council ) — Where are the real journalists ?
Certainly not in Pennsylvania , where one of the most jaw-dropping hearings in state history just took place .
Most Americans have n't heard a word about it , which is no great mystery since the media is doing everything it can to make the election results look squeaky clean .
The reality , Paul Kengor warns , is anything but @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a major reason why .
The audience , Kengor points out , gasped when they heard it .
In Gettysburg , where legislators were poring over numbers and looking at all of the claims of voting manipulation , one particular bombshell took the room 's breath away .
An expert , testifying to the Pennsylvania Senate , took to his chair and started talking about `` spike anomalies , '' or , certain points in the vote processing where a huge number of ballots are processed in `` a time period that is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ circumstances . ''
Pulling out a chart , Ret .
Col. Phil Waldren points to a 90-minute period on Election Day where 604,000 votes were counted in 90 minutes .
But here 's the astonishing part : 570,000 of those votes were for Biden and 3,200 were for Trump .
In other words , Kengor does the math , `` Biden scooped up this enormous batch by 99.4 percent .
Incredible .
Impossible .
Scandalous . ''
And he was n't the only one who thought so .
The room was audibly shocked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ `` If what Waldren alleges here is true , '' Kengor argues , `` then this would constitute one of the most insidious examples of documented voter fraud in the history of American presidential politics .
This one spike alone would have erased Donald Trump 's 600,000-vote lead over Joe Biden late Tuesday night , November 3 .
Biden has reportedly won Pennsylvania by about 70,000 votes .
This one swing would have done it .
If this is true , then this episode alone might well constitute a smoking gun affirming a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ And yet , '' he fumes , `` this electoral bombshell has been completely ignored by the mainstream press . ''
Another interesting piece of this , Kengor explained on `` Washington Watch '' Tuesday , is that of the 3.1 million mail-in ballots were sent to Pennsylvania voters ( these are updated figures from the secretary of state 's office ) , there was an extraordinarily high mail-in return rate .
According to state election officials , almost 90 percent of voters sent in a completed ballot .
That 's almost unheard @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what it would have taken for Joe Biden to [ surpass ] Donald Trump 's 700,000 vote lead in Pennsylvania seems statistically impossible . ''
And , oddly enough , a majority of those late mail-in ballots only had Joe Biden 's name circled .
`` I do n't know how common that is to have only the president checked off and nobody else .
But I find that too curious , especially given the opportunities for fraud , the lack of verification in the mail-in balloting process . ''
The press , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ though these are legitimate issues that have the power to sway the election of the most powerful leader in the free world .
`` Trump 's critics , '' Kengor understands , `` will want to dismiss the hearings as a partisan spectacle hosted by Pennsylvania Republican legislators .
You ca n't do that .
A real journalist would see enough here to at least merit making some phone calls or sending a few emails ... '' Look , he says , `` whether you like Donald Trump or not , whether you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ should concern every American .
If this were Joe Biden being victimized , I would likewise protest .
The media sure as heck would .
This is not right . ''
Published with permission from the Family Research Council .
Help stop voter fraud : Project Veritas is accepting voter fraud tips here .

PETITION UPDATE (12/7/20) - Since this petition was launched, President Trump's legal team, as well as other concerned citizens, have discovered what appears to be irrefutable evidence of voter fraud in several of the key battleground states, and have initiated legal challenges in six states.
While the situation continues to evolve, this remains a hugely important petition which we encourage you to SIGN and SHARE.
Thankfully, some of the state started to demand investigations independent of federal agencies. But we still believe that the DoJ needs to use its enormous fact-finding resources to help resolve allegations of election fraud.
To that end, we believe that conducting forensic audits of ballots and voting machines, as well as issuing subpoenas to collect more evidence, would be a good start.
Below, please WATCH and READ about the mounting evidence of voter fraud and how the mainstream media seem determined to ignore even the most egregious instances of vote tampering. Then, please SIGN and SHARE this petition.
'Trump: ‘Our election system is now under assault and siege’ and as president I must defend it'
'Tens of thousands 2020 election votes illegally scanned in Detroit, says Dominion IT contractor'
'Trump campaign files lawsuit demanding ‘a new statewide election for president’ in Georgia'
'Experts flag over 500k ballots in PA with new evidence of major 2020 election voter fraud'
''Smoking gun'? Pennsylvania vote fraud hearing gets gasps from audience'
'FBI and Justice Department have dragged their feet investigating 2020 vote fraud'
''CNN top brass in leaked tape: We won't give Trump 'too much of a platform on his not conceding'
'Twitter censored Trump 63 times over Thanksgiving holiday, Biden untouched'
LifeSite supports President Trump because we believe he is trying to defend the Constitution, so that electoral fraud does not taint the result of the 2020 general election, and so that every legal ballot is counted.
Thank you for continuing to SIGN and SHARE all our election-related petitions.
______________________________________________________________________________
Earlier today, Attoney General William Barr told the Associated Press that, "To-date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have affected a different outcome in the election."
But, the Trump Team of attorneys immediately countered by saying: "With all due respect to the Attorney General, there hasn’t been any semblance of a Department of Justice investigation."
And, that's what America wants right now: a serious investigation by the Department of Justice into seemingly irrefutable allegations of voter fraud!
Please SIGN this urgent petition which asks the Dept. of Justice to impound voting machines and ballots in swing states, and conduct a forensic audit of the apparent outcome in the presidential election.
Americans want the DoJ to do its job, and start scrutinizing evidence of voter fraud uncovered by the Trump Team of attorneys as well as other citizens acting independently of the President's Team, like attorneys Sidney Powell and Lin Wood, and the Thomas More Society's Amistad Project.
The Trump Team of attorneys say that none of the evidence they have gathered has been examined by the DoJ...none of their witnesses have been interviewed...no audits of any voting machines have taken place...and no subpoenas have been issued by the DoJ.
If true, it is scandalous that the Attorney General of the United States and the Department of Justice appear unable or unwilling to pursue this evidence of voter fraud.
Evidence needs to be examined, witnesses interviewed, audits completed, and subpoenas issued!
Significant statistical anomalies in the vote tallies in key swing states demand explanation, as does the sworn testimony of individuals who say they witnessed substantial irregularities in the electoral process.
Because...the only way to tell if election fraud has occurred is to closely examine the voting machines and ballots where red flags appear, and because, at this point, the only actor capable of conducting such an investigation is the U.S. Department of Justice.
Moreover, it is vital to act now because significant anomalies have been identified, as in this graph which Senator Rand Paul posted, showing 4 massive data dumps which provided a "winning" margin for Biden in the three key battleground states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia.
According to election security experts like Colonel Waldron (Ret.) who is a consultant with the Trump Team of lawyers, election fraud could have occurred in two principal ways:
By tampering with voting machines and their software in order to change votes for one candidate into votes for the other candidate, and, or, even to raise or lower the number of votes which one candidate receives as a proportion of votes received by the other candidate.
By printing fake ballots for one candidate which are then introduced into the general tally.
Fortunately, both methods of possible fraud leave traces which can be identified during a forensic audit (aka, a scientific examination) of the voting machines and the ballots.
In the first instance, a change in the algorithm which is used to allocate or tabulate votes can be detected by forensic examination.
And, in the second instance, pre-printed ballots favoring one candidate can be detected by inspecting the ink used to fill in the oval next to a candidate's name.
Of course, this is a complicated business. But, the stakes are much too high for investigations not to take place.
In fact, it must be done to safeguard our representative democracy and to restore confidence in the security of our elections.
This is not for the good of President Trump, but for the good of our country.
Should the Dept. of Justice fail to intervene, these elections will forever remain tainted by allegations of election fraud.
Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this urgent petition asking the Dept. of Justice to do its job and conduct a forensic audit of voting machines and ballots in key swing states, and to follow-up on the evidence being gathered by the attorneys who are trying to protect the vote.
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
'More information continues to be revealed exposing election fraud': https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/more-information-continues-to-be-revealed-exposing-election-fraud
'Powell’s ‘Kraken’ lawsuit in Georgia reveals voluminous extent of alleged voter fraud': https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/powells-kraken-lawsuit-in-georgia-reveals-voluminous-extent-of-alleged-voter-fraud
'How massive voter fraud was facilitated in three swing states: Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Nevada': https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/how-massive-voter-fraud-was-facilitated-in-three-swing-states-pennsylvania-georgia-and-nevada
'Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020': https://votepatternanalysis.substack.com/p/voting-anomalies-2020
**Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com