lifesitenews--2020-11-13--WATCH: Catholic school board bans catechism quotes on homosexuality as ‘dangerous’

Big Tech is censoring us .
Subscribe to our email list and bookmark LifeSiteNews.com to continue getting our news .
Subscribe now .
TORONTO , November 13 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) — A number of Toronto Catholic District School Board ( TCDSB ) trustees interrupted a delegate quoting the Catechism of the Catholic Church on homosexuality during a board meeting Wednesday and told him to stop .
The comments were “ treading … in dangerous waters … putting down a marginalized and vulnerable community at our board , ” said trustee Norm Di Pasquale .
“ I must warn @ @ @ @ @ @ @ uh , some of the language , I feel , is not proper , ” agreed board chair Joe Martino .
At that point , apparently amazed , trustee Nancy Crawford interjected , “ The delegate is quoting from the Catechism of the Catholic Church .
Let that sink in , please ?
Before you make your ruling .
I would appreciate that.
” However , yet another trustee objected to the delegate reading the teaching of the Catholic Church .
“ Mr .
Chair , anybody making a comment about anybody in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in a publicly funded body — is not , is not , is not acceptable in this forum , ” said Maria Rizzo .
It was a defining moment during the TCDSB special meeting that was called specifically to reopen a code of conduct violation complaint against trustee Michael Del Grande , who had been cleared of the charge in August .
Del Grande has been under attack for over a year by LGBTQ activists and their allies on the TCDSB for his opposition to gender ideology .
Pro-LGBTQ trustee Markus de Domenico @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the TCDSB , the largest publicly funded Catholic school board in Canada , called the meeting , which lasted seven hours and included 12 delegations — six for Del Grande , and six against .
When it was over , eight trustees voted that Del Grande ’ s comments from a year ago in defense of Catholic teaching on human sexuality were in violation the board ’ s code of conduct .
Del Grande , along with three trustees of the 12-member board , objected at that time to the TCDSB amending its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ gender identity ” and “ gender expression ” as protected categories as contrary to Catholic teaching .
In the course of the debate , Del Grande tabled a motion on November 7 , 2019 , requesting that the board refer the matter to committee to study whether it should add other aberrant sexual behaviors , such as pedophilia and bestiality , as prohibited grounds for discrimination under the code .
The motion was ruled out of order , eight trustees voted to include the terms , and Del Grande later said the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to underscore the consequences of the amendment .
He has since been pilloried in the press and accused by the LGBTQ lobby , in the words of former Ontario premier , MPP , and homosexual Kathleen Wynne , of “ equating homosexuality to violent criminal behavior.
” But as Josie Luetke , who delegated on behalf of Campaign Life Coalition , pointed out at Wednesday ’ s meeting , “ at best , this suggestion conveys a total misunderstanding of his argument , and , at worst , it ’ s a malicious @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he called a slippery slope argument , but it could probably be more accurately described as a valid and common form of argumentation known as reductio ad absurdum , ” she told the board .
“ Essentially , if protecting members of the school community requires listing each and every subgroup they could possibly belong to , logically , that could lead to listing very bizarre , obscure , and , yes , harmful subgroups .
Since this is an absurd and untenable conclusion , we must reject the underlying premise too , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we need not develop an exhaustive list of protected classes , as we are all children of God .
We don ’ t need any other label besides ‘ human ’ to establish that.
” However , it was delegate Jose Luis Bundoc Dizon who earned the rebuke by trustees when he brought up Catholic teaching on homosexuality in defending Del Grande .
“ I want to highlight the fact that what is at stake here is the fidelity of the Catholic school board to Catholic teaching , which we hold to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ statements that have been made about the morality of homosexual acts is nothing more than mirroring of Catholic teachings found in the Catechism of the Catholic Church , ” Dizon began .
“ Paragraph 2357 of the Catechism is quite clear on the matter , and I would like to quote the relevant section , quote : ‘ Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction towards persons of the same sex .
It has taken a great variety of forms throughout the centuries @ @ @ @ @ @ @ genesis remains largely unexplained .
Basing itself on Sacred Scripture which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity — ” And that ’ s as far as Dizon got with the Catechism , as Di Pasquale rushed in with his objection .
Dizon then agreed to “ refrain ” from quoting the Catechism but urged trustees to read the relevant sections before concluding his remarks .
Campaign Life Coalition , Canada ’ s national pro-life , pro-family political lobbying group , blasted the trustees and called on Toronto ’ s Cardinal Thomas @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is particularly devastating that the TCDSB considers it a greater scandal for a delegate to recite the Catechism of the Catholic Church than for multiple delegates to flagrantly disparage Church teaching on gender and sexuality — nearly all of whom went uninterrupted and unchallenged , ” said Jeff Gunnarson , Campaign Life ’ s national president .
“ With this direct rejection of Church teaching , and the ludicrous accusation that the Catechism of the Catholic Church is ‘ dangerous ’ and that the reading of it not suitable for a publicly funded @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Cardinal Collins to publicly put an end to this debacle at once , ” he told LifeSiteNews .
“ Anyone who attempts to purge Catholic schools of Catholic teaching is not fit to be a Catholic school board trustee , and the Cardinal must ask for their resignation , ” Gunnarson added .
“ Your Eminence , the archdiocese needs to stop wasting time on public relations and backroom deals and address this censorship of Catholic teaching publicly and boldly .
Catholic parents need to see leadership from the archdiocese.
” Gunnarson also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ withhold their Sunday donation until action is taken , and instead donate to the Michael Del Grande Legal Defense Fund.
” At the end of Wednesday ’ s meeting , the board imposed the following sanctions on Del Grande : that he make a public apology , attend an equity course , and be removed from positions on any committees and barred from being a representative of the board for three months .
In response , Del Grande has lawyered up .
He is represented by Dr. Charles Lugosi , who told LifeSiteNews @ @ @ @ @ @ @ appeal.
” The expected cost of the legal action is $ 50,000 .
Campaign Life Coalition is urging concerned Canadians to contribute to his legal defense fund , We Stand With Mike , on WonderWe .

Trustees claimed quoting the catechism was ‘putting down a marginalized and vulnerable community at our board.’
Big Tech is censoring us. Subscribe to our email list and bookmark LifeSiteNews.com to continue getting our news. Subscribe now.
TORONTO, November 13, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — A number of Toronto Catholic District School Board (TCDSB) trustees interrupted a delegate quoting the Catechism of the Catholic Church on homosexuality during a board meeting Wednesday and told him to stop.
The comments were “treading … in dangerous waters … putting down a marginalized and vulnerable community at our board,” said trustee Norm Di Pasquale.
“I must warn, uh, the delegate that, uh, some of the language, I feel, is not proper,” agreed board chair Joe Martino.
At that point, apparently amazed, trustee Nancy Crawford interjected, “The delegate is quoting from the Catechism of the Catholic Church. Let that sink in, please? Before you make your ruling. I would appreciate that.”
However, yet another trustee objected to the delegate reading the teaching of the Catholic Church.
“Mr. Chair, anybody making a comment about anybody in our community — anybody in our community in a publicly funded body — is not, is not, is not acceptable in this forum,” said Maria Rizzo.
It was a defining moment during the TCDSB special meeting that was called specifically to reopen a code of conduct violation complaint against trustee Michael Del Grande, who had been cleared of the charge in August.
Del Grande has been under attack for over a year by LGBTQ activists and their allies on the TCDSB for his opposition to gender ideology.
Pro-LGBTQ trustee Markus de Domenico, who is running for chair of the TCDSB, the largest publicly funded Catholic school board in Canada, called the meeting, which lasted seven hours and included 12 delegations — six for Del Grande, and six against.
When it was over, eight trustees voted that Del Grande’s comments from a year ago in defense of Catholic teaching on human sexuality were in violation the board’s code of conduct.
Del Grande, along with three trustees of the 12-member board, objected at that time to the TCDSB amending its code of conduct to include the terms “gender identity” and “gender expression” as protected categories as contrary to Catholic teaching.
In the course of the debate, Del Grande tabled a motion on November 7, 2019, requesting that the board refer the matter to committee to study whether it should add other aberrant sexual behaviors, such as pedophilia and bestiality, as prohibited grounds for discrimination under the code.
The motion was ruled out of order, eight trustees voted to include the terms, and Del Grande later said the motion was “hyperbolic” and intended to underscore the consequences of the amendment.
He has since been pilloried in the press and accused by the LGBTQ lobby, in the words of former Ontario premier, MPP, and homosexual Kathleen Wynne, of “equating homosexuality to violent criminal behavior.”
But as Josie Luetke, who delegated on behalf of Campaign Life Coalition, pointed out at Wednesday’s meeting, “at best, this suggestion conveys a total misunderstanding of his argument, and, at worst, it’s a malicious lie.”
Del Grande “employed what he called a slippery slope argument, but it could probably be more accurately described as a valid and common form of argumentation known as reductio ad absurdum,” she told the board.
“Essentially, if protecting members of the school community requires listing each and every subgroup they could possibly belong to, logically, that could lead to listing very bizarre, obscure, and, yes, harmful subgroups. Since this is an absurd and untenable conclusion, we must reject the underlying premise too,” observed Luetke.
“Indeed, we need not develop an exhaustive list of protected classes, as we are all children of God. We don’t need any other label besides ‘human’ to establish that.”
However, it was delegate Jose Luis Bundoc Dizon who earned the rebuke by trustees when he brought up Catholic teaching on homosexuality in defending Del Grande.
“I want to highlight the fact that what is at stake here is the fidelity of the Catholic school board to Catholic teaching, which we hold to be based on revelation from God. The statements that have been made about the morality of homosexual acts is nothing more than mirroring of Catholic teachings found in the Catechism of the Catholic Church,” Dizon began.
“Paragraph 2357 of the Catechism is quite clear on the matter, and I would like to quote the relevant section, quote: ‘Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction towards persons of the same sex. It has taken a great variety of forms throughout the centuries and in different cultures. Its psychological genesis remains largely unexplained. Basing itself on Sacred Scripture which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity —”
And that’s as far as Dizon got with the Catechism, as Di Pasquale rushed in with his objection.
Dizon then agreed to “refrain” from quoting the Catechism but urged trustees to read the relevant sections before concluding his remarks.
Di Pasquale subsequently retweeted this congratulatory message from Julianna Ozorio:
THANK YOU @normsworld for shutting that down. Quoting the catechism as a means of demonizing the LGBTQ+ community has no place in this meeting or in PUBLICLY. FUNDED. EDUCATION. — Julianna Ozorio (@theozoriothe) November 12, 2020
Campaign Life Coalition, Canada’s national pro-life, pro-family political lobbying group, blasted the trustees and called on Toronto’s Cardinal Thomas Collins to take action.
“It is particularly devastating that the TCDSB considers it a greater scandal for a delegate to recite the Catechism of the Catholic Church than for multiple delegates to flagrantly disparage Church teaching on gender and sexuality — nearly all of whom went uninterrupted and unchallenged,” said Jeff Gunnarson, Campaign Life’s national president.
“With this direct rejection of Church teaching, and the ludicrous accusation that the Catechism of the Catholic Church is ‘dangerous’ and that the reading of it not suitable for a publicly funded forum, we can only look to Cardinal Collins to publicly put an end to this debacle at once,” he told LifeSiteNews.
“Anyone who attempts to purge Catholic schools of Catholic teaching is not fit to be a Catholic school board trustee, and the Cardinal must ask for their resignation,” Gunnarson added.
— Article continues below Petition — PETITION: Urge the RCMP to launch independent investigation into the WE Charity contract deal Show Petition Text 6904 have signed the petition. Let's get to 7500 ! Thank you for signing this petition! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Country... State... Sign this Petition Please SIGN this petition which asks the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) to launch an investigation into the controversial WE Charity contract deal. Canadians deserve a corruption-free government, but allegations of impropriety are hanging over matters related to the WE Charity contract deal with the current government. And, only the RCMP is positioned to launch an independent inquiry into the issues of whether or not any laws were broken, and or possible abuse of political office for personal or family gain. Indeed, the WE Charity was criticized in June 2020 when the Canadian government selected the charity to administer the Canada Student Service Grant program, a $900 million program which would help students experiencing financial difficulties due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Of particular concern are revelations that WE Charity paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to members of the Trudeau family for past speaking engagements, and that the charity paid for Finance Minister Bill Morneau’s vacation (Morneau later repaid them). These revelations obviously raise serious questions: What is the connection between WE Charity and high-ranking government officials?
What, if anything, did either party stand to gain from this contract?
Why and how was the $43.53 M contract awarded to WE Charity without going through a competitive bidding process?
And, was the Lobbying Act violated? The main concern is that the charity has deep connections with the Trudeau Family and other important government officials, and that serious conflicts of interests may have existed between members of government and the charity...and that laws may have been broken. Although an investigation into the connection between the federal government and WE Charity was launched, questions have not been answered. Instead, more questions have been brought up. Since the story broke, the Liberals have repeatedly delayed voting on the release of WE Charity documents. And, just recently, a motion, which was sponsored by the Conservatives in the House of Commons and which called for an investigation into the relationships between WE Charity and the government and Ministers of the Crown and their families, was defeated. But, the fact that the government and its political allies seem to be trying to bury this issue politically should not distract the attention of law enforcement who have a duty to ensure that government officials are held to account for serious breaches of conflict of interest. No government leader or official should behave as though they are above the law. Please SIGN this petition which calls on the RCMP to launch an independent investigation into the WE Charity controversy. Then, please SHARE with your like-minded family, friends and relations. FOR MORE INFORMATION: 'Politician accuses Trudeau of redacting ‘damning information’ in released docs on WE Charity scandal' 'Conservative MP grills Trudeau on family’s enrichment in WE Charity scandal' 'Scandal-plagued WE Charity shuts down Canadian operations, will leave ‘endowment’' Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com Hide Petition Text Sign this Petition
“Your Eminence, the archdiocese needs to stop wasting time on public relations and backroom deals and address this censorship of Catholic teaching publicly and boldly. Catholic parents need to see leadership from the archdiocese.”
Gunnarson also urged Catholics in the archdiocese to “withhold their Sunday donation until action is taken, and instead donate to the Michael Del Grande Legal Defense Fund.”
At the end of Wednesday’s meeting, the board imposed the following sanctions on Del Grande: that he make a public apology, attend an equity course, and be removed from positions on any committees and barred from being a representative of the board for three months.
In response, Del Grande has lawyered up. He is represented by Dr. Charles Lugosi, who told LifeSiteNews that “preparations are underway for an appeal.”
The expected cost of the legal action is $50,000. Campaign Life Coalition is urging concerned Canadians to contribute to his legal defense fund, We Stand With Mike, on WonderWe.
Share


lifesitenews--2020-11-13--Polish protests for fake ‘abortion rights’ are a betrayal of women: pro-life campaigner

November 13 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) – Protestors in Poland championing “ pro-abortion fake rights ” are an “ attack on womanhood ” and a “ betrayal mothers , when they need support the most , ” pro-life campaigner Maria Madise told a Polish pro-life conference this week .
Madise , director of Voice of the Family , told the Women ’ s Rights Conference that it would be “ difficult to overestimate the significance ” of the the recent ruling by the the Polish Constitutional Tribunal that eugenic abortion violates the Polish Constitution .
Madise said the response @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to renew their attacks against the most vulnerable of unborn children under the deceptive guise of ‘ women ’ s rights.
’ ” “ An authentic human right can never be a threat to the right to life .
Furthermore , authentic human rights can never be separated from our duty to protect innocent human life , ” Madise explained .
“ Only moral absolutes , reflected in national and international law , can really protect society ’ s weakest and most vulnerable human beings.
” Madise said the targeting through testing and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Down ’ s syndrome was “ modern day eugenics ” and that women are being instrumentalized in the process at a time when they are particularly vulnerable .
“ Overwhelming evidence shows that the reality of women ‘ benefiting ’ from these so-called rights is a woman who is cornered and feels she has no choice , ” Madise said .
“ A 2012 Brazilian study found that while women did not always fully understand the disability their baby was diagnosed with and needed greater attention by health professionals than they received , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the pregnancy was chosen , ‘ a feeling of intense hope is observed , a feeling that change might be possible , ’ ” she continued .
Madise concluded her talk by saying “ Poland has illuminated the way to the rebuilding of a truly civilized society ” because of its treatment of the most vulnerable members of our society .
“ A civilization can be judged by how it treats its most vulnerable members .
Unborn children are the most vulnerable members of the human family , ” she said .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that represent certain values and are dear to Polish people .
They really show who you are.
” “ Political and doctrinal contexts of the discussion on women ’ s rights ” We applaud the Polish people who have taken a stand in protection of unborn children and have now come under intense attack encouraged by the worldwide pro-abortion media .
We totally support your continuing efforts to ensure this protection will be fully established and maintained in your laws .
By their historic ruling the Polish Constitutional Tribunal has set the truth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conception before the world .
This ruling seeks to restore protection to the lives of the most vulnerable children – those who are disabled and not yet born – as well as to give the support needed to their mothers to welcome and love them regardless of their special needs .
It would be difficult to overestimate the significance of this judgment in the global struggle to defend human life from conception .
Our pro-abortion enemies supported by national as well as international institutions understand that fact only too well .
In response @ @ @ @ @ @ @ renew their attacks against the most vulnerable of unborn children under the deceptive guise of “ women ’ s rights ” .
An authentic human right can never be a threat to the right to life .
Furthermore , authentic human rights can never be separated from our duty to protect innocent human life .
This is especially true for women , who are particularly called to nourish and care for life .
Only moral absolutes , reflected in national and international law , can really protect society ’ s weakest and most @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the killing of an unborn child can never be a just law .
The legalized killing of unborn children who may be suffering from a disease or a disability can never comply with authentic human rights .
It is evident , therefore , that the so-called “ women ’ s rights ” , as they were championed on the streets of Poland , are not authentic rights .
On the contrary , pro-abortion fake rights of women are an of attack on womanhood , and they are a betrayal mothers , when they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and their families need accurate , up-to-date information about the care practices and resources available for individuals with disabilities and their families .
The experience of our post-abortion counselling service Abortion Recovery Care Helpline ( ARCH ) , supported by international research , shows that many women who have aborted their children on the grounds of a disability are especially traumatized .
These women , who often wanted the child very much , find it particularly difficult to come to terms with the fact that they chose to abort their sick baby when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ By comparison , mothers who gave birth to their child , even knowing that the baby would die soon after birth , have emphasized the peace experienced at that time of natural bereavement .
In England and Wales , well over 90 % of babies suspected of having Down ’ s syndrome are aborted .
As prenatal testing is becoming more widely available and strongly recommended , women may feel that it is irresponsible to opt out .
International studies show that in stressful situations – and often without receiving adequate explanation regarding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when they are unable to comprehend this information fully – women find it easiest to comply with what they believe is the recommendation of healthcare professionals .
A 2012 Norwegian study demonstrates that while screening technologies increase ‘ options ’ they also effectively decrease ‘ choice ’ , that is , freely made decisions .
[ 1 ] The new prenatal tests , such as Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing ( NIPT ) in the UK , target children with Down ’ s syndrome .
This is of course deeply disturbing .
It signals a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people with Down ’ s syndrome and others with disabilities .
This is clearly a form of prenatal ‘ quality-control ’ .
This is modern day eugenics .
It is deciding that some human beings are not good enough , are not useful enough by our standards .
This is sending an awful message to disabled people in our society : What good are you ?
You just suffer and die .
In fact , it would be better , if you had not been born .
Abandoning the legal protection for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to get rid of them .
This is a huge attack on humanity , on unconditional love , on security for anyone , because once we accept that pain and suffering can be eliminated by eliminating people , where could one draw and end ?
And this large-scale attack on humanity , on authentic human rights , has been launched by instrumentalizing women at the time when they are particularly vulnerable .
In 52 years , abortion in Britain has spread from what was intended as strictly restricted to an epidemic .
Now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just a phone call away , available in your own home .
A woman , perhaps isolated and confused , perhaps pressured by others , can kill her own child with pills she has obtained by mail , fully in line with fake women ’ s rights .
Those who advocate for such so-called rights paint a picture of a calm , cool and collected woman who , weighing her options with expert advice , decides freely .
Overwhelming evidence shows that the reality of women “ benefiting ” from these so-called rights @ @ @ @ @ @ @ feels she has no choice .
A 2012 Brazilian study found that while women did not always fully understand the disability their baby was diagnosed with and needed greater attention by health professionals than they received , yet , when the option of continuing the pregnancy was chosen , “ a feeling of intense hope is observed , a feeling that change might be possible ” .
[ 2 ] As long as there is life , there is hope .
We are , therefore , deeply grateful to the Polish Court and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ given that hope to mothers and families , by determining that the abortion of children diagnosed with a disability is incompatible with the Polish Constitution and numerous principles of international law .
According to the preamble of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities ( 2006 ) children with disabilities should fully enjoy all human rights on an equal basis with other children .
It would be highly hypocritical , therefore , to respect such equality for children only after birth and not before .
We should also recall that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the ratification of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities stated clearly that one of its articles ( Article 25a ) “ can not be interpreted as a way of confirming the right of an individual to abortion or ordering the state to provide access to it ” .
The Polish Constitutional Tribunal had already recognized the interrelated nature of the protection of human dignity and legal guarantees of the protection of human life in its judgment of 27 January 2004 , when it stated that : “ There can be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are no sufficient grounds to protect life ” .
Now the Tribunal has truly ruled in favor of human dignity – fully in line with the preamble to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities , according to which discrimination against anyone on the basis of disability “ is a violation of the inherent dignity and value of the human person ” .
The moral blindness of our society has grown to the extent that the killing of fifty million unborn children each year is no longer considered a crime that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ millions of women walk the earth wounded to the core – in their femininity , motherhood , in their ability to love , to say nothing of those who all share in these wounds , even if they also share responsibility for inflicting them .
Extensive permissiveness is sadly the trend in virtually every country where abortion was legalized in so-called hard cases – that is , in cases when the baby has been conceived in rape or in cases when the baby has been diagnosed with disability .
And in none of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so-called hard cases .
Once a country has abortion in certain cases , it has abortion and it is extremely difficult to turn around .
Poland is set to go against all odds in doing just that – in reversing the injustice and harm done to its people and its culture .
The pressure on pro-life Poland to give in is immense , from powerful voices from within as well as without .
Those powers don ’ t love life , they don ’ t love women , they don ’ t love @ @ @ @ @ @ @ merely laws that represent certain values and are dear to Polish people .
They really show who you are .
A civilization can be judged by how it treats its most vulnerable members .
Unborn children are the most vulnerable members of the human family .
While a mother ’ s womb should be the safest place , it is statistically one of the most dangerous places to live !
Unborn children with disabilities , in turn , are the most vulnerable among the unborn .
It is , therefore , the protection @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is the core criterion in evaluating the level of our civilization .
Poland has illuminated the way to the rebuilding of a truly civilized society , where innocent life is protected from conception and mothers supported in their noble mission to nourish life .

'An authentic human right can never be a threat to the right to life,' pro-life campaigner Maria Madise told the Women’s Rights Conference in Poland this week.
November 13, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – Protestors in Poland championing “pro-abortion fake rights” are an “attack on womanhood” and a “betrayal mothers, when they need support the most,” pro-life campaigner Maria Madise told a Polish pro-life conference this week.
Madise, director of Voice of the Family, told the Women’s Rights Conference that it would be “difficult to overestimate the significance” of the the recent ruling by the the Polish Constitutional Tribunal that eugenic abortion violates the Polish Constitution.
Madise said the response of pro-abortion groups was “mobilize women to renew their attacks against the most vulnerable of unborn children under the deceptive guise of ‘women’s rights.’”
“An authentic human right can never be a threat to the right to life. Furthermore, authentic human rights can never be separated from our duty to protect innocent human life,” Madise explained.
“Only moral absolutes, reflected in national and international law, can really protect society’s weakest and most vulnerable human beings.”
— Article continues below Petition — PETITION: Stand with Poland for defending the unborn and churches against leftist aggression! Show Petition Text 3555 have signed the petition. Let's get to 4000 ! Thank you for signing this petition! Add your signature: Show Petition Text Country... State... Sign this Petition Young Poles defending their church against pro-abortion aggression stemming from the decision of the country's Constitutional Court to protect the lives of sick unborn babies. Photo Credit: Polonia Christiana Since the Constitutional Court of Poland's decision on October 22nd to protect and vindicate the right to life of sick preborn children, leftist pro-abort feminists have been attacking churches, government officials and pro-lifers across Poland in a foul display of bloody-minded vulgarity. But, we STAND with Poland. And, we PRAY for Poland. Please WATCH this video which congratulates faithful Catholics in Poland for their pro-life example and for standing up to rioters trying to vandalize statues, churches. We now call on all pro-lifers, faithful Christians (especially in the Polish diaspora) and pro-life organizations to SIGN this petition to encourage pro-lifers in Poland, the Polish Constitutional Court, and especially the Polish Government to remain steadfastly pro-life right now. And we call on all faithful Polish Catholics to defend their churches and patriotic monuments! This is the time to keep faith with generations of Polish heroes and "Be not afraid!" This is not the time for the Government to give-in to demands from the opposition. Stand up against the people who are attacking your churches while baying for the blood of innocent preborn children! And, explain to your people how the Court was RIGHT to have challenged the abortion law allowing the barbaric practice of eugenic abortion. Poland is a republican democracy, and in such a democracy, the Constitutional Court has the last say on matters of national importance. The Polish Court has spoken, and its ruling should be respected and implemented. And, under no circumstances should the Polish Government promise to reverse this decision in law or by granting a referendum on the same. Poland, be courageous and stand fast for Life. Don't give in to the Culture of Death! Thank you for your example, Poland. Now, remain strong! And, thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this petition of support and solidarity with the Constitutional Court of Poland's decision to disallow eugenic abortion. Thank you also for standing with and praying for Polish pro-lifers and government officials to remain steadfastly pro-life during time of leftist, pro-abortion aggression. After you sign and share, could you also take the time to congratulate the Polish pro-life movement for their historic victory in defense of human life, and to offer emotional and spiritual support? Please contact: The Ordo Iuris Institute for Legal Culture Jerzy Kwaśniewski, Esq., President
Zielna 39
00-108 Warszawa
Poland
Tel: +48 22 404 38 50
Fax +48 22 127 91 25
[email protected] AND Fundacja Pro-Prawo do Życia ul. J. I. Kraszewskiego 27/22 05-800 Pruszków
Poland
Tel: +48 608 594 158
[email protected] FOR MORE INFORMATION: 'Poland bans eugenic abortion, possibly saving over 1K babies per year' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/poland-bans-eugenic-abortion-possibly-saving-over-1k-babies-per-year Hide Petition Text Sign this Petition
Madise said the targeting through testing and destruction through abortion of unborn babies with Down’s syndrome was “modern day eugenics” and that women are being instrumentalized in the process at a time when they are particularly vulnerable.
“Overwhelming evidence shows that the reality of women ‘benefiting’ from these so-called rights is a woman who is cornered and feels she has no choice,” Madise said.
“A 2012 Brazilian study found that while women did not always fully understand the disability their baby was diagnosed with and needed greater attention by health professionals than they received, yet, when the option of continuing the pregnancy was chosen, ‘a feeling of intense hope is observed, a feeling that change might be possible,’” she continued.
Madise concluded her talk by saying “Poland has illuminated the way to the rebuilding of a truly civilized society” because of its treatment of the most vulnerable members of our society.
“A civilization can be judged by how it treats its most vulnerable members. Unborn children are the most vulnerable members of the human family,” she said.
“Polish pro-life laws are not merely laws that represent certain values and are dear to Polish people. They really show who you are.”
“Political and doctrinal contexts of the discussion on women’s rights”
12 November 2020
Maria Madise
We applaud the Polish people who have taken a stand in protection of unborn children and have now come under intense attack encouraged by the worldwide pro-abortion media. We totally support your continuing efforts to ensure this protection will be fully established and maintained in your laws.
By their historic ruling the Polish Constitutional Tribunal has set the truth about the sanctity of human life from conception before the world. This ruling seeks to restore protection to the lives of the most vulnerable children – those who are disabled and not yet born – as well as to give the support needed to their mothers to welcome and love them regardless of their special needs.
It would be difficult to overestimate the significance of this judgment in the global struggle to defend human life from conception. Our pro-abortion enemies supported by national as well as international institutions understand that fact only too well. In response, they seek to mobilize women to renew their attacks against the most vulnerable of unborn children under the deceptive guise of “women’s rights”.
An authentic human right can never be a threat to the right to life. Furthermore, authentic human rights can never be separated from our duty to protect innocent human life. This is especially true for women, who are particularly called to nourish and care for life.
Only moral absolutes, reflected in national and international law, can really protect society’s weakest and most vulnerable human beings. A law permitting the killing of an unborn child can never be a just law. The legalized killing of unborn children who may be suffering from a disease or a disability can never comply with authentic human rights.
It is evident, therefore, that the so-called “women’s rights”, as they were championed on the streets of Poland, are not authentic rights. On the contrary, pro-abortion fake rights of women are an of attack on womanhood, and they are a betrayal mothers, when they need support the most.
Pregnant women and their families need accurate, up-to-date information about the care practices and resources available for individuals with disabilities and their families. The experience of our post-abortion counselling service Abortion Recovery Care Helpline (ARCH), supported by international research, shows that many women who have aborted their children on the grounds of a disability are especially traumatized.
These women, who often wanted the child very much, find it particularly difficult to come to terms with the fact that they chose to abort their sick baby when that baby needed them the most. By comparison, mothers who gave birth to their child, even knowing that the baby would die soon after birth, have emphasized the peace experienced at that time of natural bereavement.
In England and Wales, well over 90% of babies suspected of having Down’s syndrome are aborted. As prenatal testing is becoming more widely available and strongly recommended, women may feel that it is irresponsible to opt out. International studies show that in stressful situations – and often without receiving adequate explanation regarding what a certain diagnosis may involve or when they are unable to comprehend this information fully – women find it easiest to comply with what they believe is the recommendation of healthcare professionals. A 2012 Norwegian study demonstrates that while screening technologies increase ‘options’ they also effectively decrease ‘choice’, that is, freely made decisions.[1]
The new prenatal tests, such as Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) in the UK, target children with Down’s syndrome. This is of course deeply disturbing. It signals a determination by our government officials to eliminate people with Down’s syndrome and others with disabilities. This is clearly a form of prenatal ‘quality-control’.
This is modern day eugenics. It is deciding that some human beings are not good enough, are not useful enough by our standards. This is sending an awful message to disabled people in our society: What good are you? You just suffer and die. In fact, it would be better, if you had not been born. Abandoning the legal protection for the disabled children has created a social expectation to get rid of them.
This is a huge attack on humanity, on unconditional love, on security for anyone, because once we accept that pain and suffering can be eliminated by eliminating people, where could one draw and end?
And this large-scale attack on humanity, on authentic human rights, has been launched by instrumentalizing women at the time when they are particularly vulnerable.
In 52 years, abortion in Britain has spread from what was intended as strictly restricted to an epidemic. Now under the lockdown rules, abortion is just a phone call away, available in your own home. A woman, perhaps isolated and confused, perhaps pressured by others, can kill her own child with pills she has obtained by mail, fully in line with fake women’s rights.
Those who advocate for such so-called rights paint a picture of a calm, cool and collected woman who, weighing her options with expert advice, decides freely. Overwhelming evidence shows that the reality of women “benefiting” from these so-called rights is a woman who is cornered and feels she has no choice.
A 2012 Brazilian study found that while women did not always fully understand the disability their baby was diagnosed with and needed greater attention by health professionals than they received, yet, when the option of continuing the pregnancy was chosen, “a feeling of intense hope is observed, a feeling that change might be possible”.[2]As long as there is life, there is hope.
We are, therefore, deeply grateful to the Polish Court and people behind this ruling who have just given that hope to mothers and families, by determining that the abortion of children diagnosed with a disability is incompatible with the Polish Constitution and numerous principles of international law.
According to the preamble of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) children with disabilities should fully enjoy all human rights on an equal basis with other children. It would be highly hypocritical, therefore, to respect such equality for children only after birth and not before. We should also recall that the reservation presented by the Polish delegation during the ratification of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities stated clearly that one of its articles (Article 25a) “cannot be interpreted as a way of confirming the right of an individual to abortion or ordering the state to provide access to it”.
The Polish Constitutional Tribunal had already recognized the interrelated nature of the protection of human dignity and legal guarantees of the protection of human life in its judgment of 27 January 2004, when it stated that: “There can be no protection of human dignity if there are no sufficient grounds to protect life”.
Now the Tribunal has truly ruled in favor of human dignity – fully in line with the preamble to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, according to which discrimination against anyone on the basis of disability “is a violation of the inherent dignity and value of the human person”.
The moral blindness of our society has grown to the extent that the killing of fifty million unborn children each year is no longer considered a crime that cries out to heaven. Consequently, millions of women walk the earth wounded to the core – in their femininity, motherhood, in their ability to love, to say nothing of those who all share in these wounds, even if they also share responsibility for inflicting them.
Extensive permissiveness is sadly the trend in virtually every country where abortion was legalized in so-called hard cases – that is, in cases when the baby has been conceived in rape or in cases when the baby has been diagnosed with disability. And in none of these countries did it stop at these so-called hard cases. Once a country has abortion in certain cases, it has abortion and it is extremely difficult to turn around. Poland is set to go against all odds in doing just that – in reversing the injustice and harm done to its people and its culture.
The pressure on pro-life Poland to give in is immense, from powerful voices from within as well as without. Those powers don’t love life, they don’t love women, they don’t love Poland. Polish pro-life laws are not merely laws that represent certain values and are dear to Polish people. They really show who you are.
A civilization can be judged by how it treats its most vulnerable members. Unborn children are the most vulnerable members of the human family. While a mother’s womb should be the safest place, it is statistically one of the most dangerous places to live! Unborn children with disabilities, in turn, are the most vulnerable among the unborn. It is, therefore, the protection of these children and their families that is the core criterion in evaluating the level of our civilization. Poland has illuminated the way to the rebuilding of a truly civilized society, where innocent life is protected from conception and mothers supported in their noble mission to nourish life.
[1]Aune I & Moller A (2012) ‘I want a choice, but I don’t want to decide’ – a qualitative study of pregnant women’s experiences regarding early ultrasound risk assessment for chromosomal anomalies. Midwifery 28:14-23. Quoted in Greg Pipe, Abortion and Women’s Health, updated 2017, The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children. [2]Benute GR, Nomura RM, Liao AW, Brizot Mde L, De Lucia MC & Zugaib M (2012) Feelings of women regarding end-of-life decision making after ultrasound diagnosis of a lethal fetal malformation. Midwifery 28:472-475. Quoted ibid.
Share


lifesitenews--2020-11-13--Pro-life Washington insider hopeful for future GOP agenda

November 13 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) – Marjorie Dannenfelser from the Susan B. Anthony List joins Jonathon Van Maren @ @ @ @ @ results and why we need to have hope as Americans .
Dannenfelser begins by giving @ @ @ @ @ look at the mood in the White House on election night .
She also discusses @ @ @ @ @ race as well as the Republican wins in Congress .
Dannenfelser points out House GOP @ @ @ @ @ the conservative movement and the birth of a new Republicanism .
Van Maren highlights the @ @ @ @ @ Anthony List played in getting new pro-life Republicans elected .
The Van Maren Show is @ @ @ @ @ including Spotify , SoundCloud , iTunes , and Google Play .
For a full listing @ @ @ @ @ subscribe to various channels , visit our Acast webpage here .
To receive weekly emails @ @ @ @ @ uploaded , subscribe below :

Dannenfelser points out House GOP victories indicate positive sentiment toward the conservative movement and the birth of a new Republicanism.
November 13, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – Marjorie Dannenfelser from the Susan B. Anthony List joins Jonathon Van Maren to discuss the 2020 election results and why we need to have hope as Americans.
Dannenfelser begins by giving listeners a behind the scenes look at the mood in the White House on election night. She also discusses the implications of the presidential race as well as the Republican wins in Congress.
Dannenfelser points out House GOP victories indicate positive sentiment toward the conservative movement and the birth of a new Republicanism.
Van Maren highlights the important role the Susan B. Anthony List played in getting new pro-life Republicans elected.
Listen to the full interview:
The Van Maren Show is hosted on numerous platforms, including Spotify, SoundCloud, iTunes, and Google Play.
For a full listing of episodes, and to subscribe to various channels, visit our Acast webpage here.
To receive weekly emails when a new episode is uploaded, subscribe below:
Email Address *
First Name *
Last Name *


lifesitenews--2020-11-12--BREAKING: Judge orders Pennsylvania to stop counting certain late ballots

Big Tech is censoring us .
Subscribe to our email list and bookmark LifeSiteNews.com to continue getting our news .
Subscribe now .
November 12 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) — Pennsylvania Secretary of the Commonwealth Kathy Boockvar “ lacked statutory authority ” to direct state election officials to count mail-in ballots even if they did not receive proof of identification by November 9 , President Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt of Pennsylvania ruled Thursday in a victory for the Trump campaign ’ s legal campaign to prevent the state from being certified for Democrat nominee Joe Biden .
The U.S. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ election officials in Pennsylvania ( as well as North Carolina ) could accept absentee ballots for up to three days after the election , though the court also ruled several days later that all ballots that would arrive beyond the legal deadline be segregated and counted separately , in response to a lawsuit by state Republicans to stop a last-minute rule change by Boockvar that allowed the ballots to be counted and co-mingled with ballots that had arrived on time .
But on Thursday , Leavitt ruled that the Secretary of the Commonwealth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ November 1 , 2020 , guidance to Respondents County Boards of Elections insofar as that guidance purported to change the deadline [ ... ] for certain electors to verify proof of identification.
” “ Accordingly , the Court hereby ORDERS that Respondents County Boards of Elections are enjoined from counting any ballots that have been segregated ” pursuant to the court ’ s previous order on the matter .
WCSI notes that the order represents a victory for the Trump campaign , which needs Pennsylvania ’ s 20 electoral votes to stand even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Boockvar said Tuesday that the state received approximately 10,000 ballots after the polls closed , and was still in the process of counting 94,000 provisional ballots that had been given to voters on election day .
Biden currently holds a 53,978 lead over Trump in the state .
Most national news networks have called the race for Biden , but no election results have been certified yet .
Recounts are pending in Georgia and likely in Wisconsin and potentially additional states , and the Trump campaign is pursuing challenges based on evidence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Michigan , Nevada , and another Pennsylvania dispute over allowing its campaign workers to observe the vote counting .
Help stop voter fraud : The Trump Campaign has created “ Defend Your Ballot ” to report election issues .
Report fraud here or call 888-630-1776 .
Project Veritas is also accepting voter fraud tips here .
The FBI says to report suspected instances of voter suppression/fraud to your local FBI field office or at tips.fbi.gov .

PETITION UPDATE (1/15/2021) -
The events of the past month, and especially the past 10 days, have shaken the faith Americans have in their elected and appoint officials.
We continue to call for investigations to be made into allegations of election fraud. Texas is in the process of prosecuting one political operative for illegal ballot harvesting, and multiple state legislatures have called for investigations, too.
However, the judiciary has severely let down the American electorate.
As we have said all along, the integrity of the election is much bigger than President Trump. Election integrity is at the heart of republican democracy, and if we don't have it, we no longer have a functioning republic.
Therefore, we continue to seek the truth for the election outcome. Perhaps that will only be known in the future when state or federal commissions are established to investigate the instances of election fraud which were witnessed and sworn to, by thousands of Americans of all political persuasions.
In the meantime, you may still sign this petition. Thank you!
___________________________________________________________________
PETITION UPDATE (12/10/20) -
On Wednesday, President Trump tweeted: "We will be INTERVENING in the Texas (plus many other states) case. This is the big one. Our Country needs a victory!"
He is referring to the lawsuit which the state of Texas has filed against Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Georgia in the Supreme Court over changes those states made to their election rules, claiming they violated the U.S. Constitution in the process.
Here is the central part of the argument: if Texas were to allow possible voter fraud to go unchecked in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Georgia, it would be akin to committing fraud upon the people of Texas, who cast their ballots within the framework of the law.
Indeed, this would apply equally to all citizens who voted within the framework of the law across the United States!
President Trump also tweeted that this case is, "very strong...ALL CRITERIA MET."
Please continue to SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition, now.
____________________________________________________________________
PETITION UPDATE (12/7/20) - Since this petition was launched, President Trump's legal team, as well as other concerned citizens, have discovered what appears to be irrefutable evidence of voter fraud in several of the key battleground states, and have initiated legal challenges in six states.
While the situation continues to evolve, this remains a hugely important petition which we encourage you to SIGN and SHARE.
Below, please WATCH and READ about the mounting evidence of voter fraud and how the mainstream media seem determined to ignore even the most egregious instances of vote tampering. Then, please SIGN and SHARE this petition.
'Trump: ‘Our election system is now under assault and siege’ and as president I must defend it'
'Tens of thousands 2020 election votes illegally scanned in Detroit, says Dominion IT contractor'
'Trump campaign files lawsuit demanding ‘a new statewide election for president’ in Georgia'
'Experts flag over 500k ballots in PA with new evidence of major 2020 election voter fraud'
''Smoking gun'? Pennsylvania vote fraud hearing gets gasps from audience'
'FBI and Justice Department have dragged their feet investigating 2020 vote fraud'
''CNN top brass in leaked tape: We won't give Trump 'too much of a platform on his not conceding'
'Twitter censored Trump 63 times over Thanksgiving holiday, Biden untouched'
LifeSite supports President Trump with this petition because we believe he is trying to defend the Constitution, ensuring that electoral fraud does not taint the result of the 2020 general election.
But, since starting this petition, we have launched a separate petition related to the disputed election outcome, calling on the Department of Justice to 'do their job' and engage in meaningful investigations of the mounting evidence of voter fraud.
We believe that conducting forensic audits of ballots and voting machines, as well as issuing subpoenas to collect more evidence, would be a good start.
Thankfully, some of the state started to demand investigations independent of federal agencies. But we still believe that the DoJ needs to use its enormous fact-finding resources to help resolve allegations of election fraud.
Thank you for continuing to SIGN and SHARE all our election-related petitions.
_____________________________________________________________________
Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition which calls on all Americans to Stand With President Trump as he uses every legitimate means to find out if voter fraud played any role in the election outcome.
Amid allegations of voter fraud, and at a time when the situation with COVID has been used by many of the states to facilitate the use of mail-in ballots on a massive scale, we need to be very careful in dismissing the possibility of voter fraud.
The fact is, the possibility of wide-spread fraud with mail-in ballots is significant.
But, this is not about Donald Trump or Joe Biden! This about whether or not the sanctity of the ballot box has been tampered with!
Please Stand With President Trump as he attempts to defend the integrity of this election, as well as well as the right to vote itself!
Indeed, this is so important, not so much because one election hangs in the balance, but because our democracy, itself, hangs in the balance.
Americans not only have a right to know, but should demand that every legitimate means be used to discover the truth about these elections!
Please SIGN this petition and Stand With President Trump to ensure that these elections were conducted freely and fairly!
While most all Americans believe in playing by the rules, we also know that some very devious, politically-motivated operatives have been trying to harm the Trump administration from before he even took the oath of office.
This fact should lead us to question how some allegations of voter fraud can be so easily dismissed by state election authorities.
We demand to know the truth, and, for the sake of our democracy, we demand that President Trump keep fighting to learn the truth.
Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this petition today!
**Photo Credit: Shealah Craighead / White House / Flickr


lifesitenews--2020-11-14--California gov. parties at exclusive restaurant as citizens banned from multi-family gatherings

CALIFORNIA , November 14 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) — Earlier this month California Governor Gavin Newsom dined at “ one of the world 's most exclusive restaurants ” with “ people from several other households , ” Politico reported .
For nearly all of 2020 , Newsom has presided over one of America ’ s strictest lockdowns , which currently includes a ban on gatherings of more than three households .
“ Gatherings that include more than 3 households are prohibited .
This includes everyone present , including hosts and guests .
Remember , the smaller the number of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the “ Guidance for Private Gatherings , ” issued by the California Department of Public Health on October 9 .
Newsom , a Democrat , with other members of his party around the country — such as Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot — has been discouraging people from celebrating Thanksgiving this year .
The California rules apply to private gatherings which the state defines as “ social situations that bring together people from different households at the same time in a single space or place.
” Californians are also banned from socializing for more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ First Partner and I followed the restaurant ’ s health protocols and took safety precautions , I should have modeled better behavior and not joined the dinner , ” Newsom said .
The dinner had been to honor one of his top political advisors .
It took place at The French Laundry , where meals range from just over $ 300 for a single person to $ 2,500 for two people .
Newsom joins a long list of leftists and liberal politicians who have flouted their own coronavirus rules to riot and/or protest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get their hair done ( Lightfoot ; House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ) , freely breathe air without cloth obstructing their nose and mouth ( CNN ’ s Chris Cuomo ) , commit adultery ( Neil Ferguson , the U.K. professor whose errant predictions of millions of COVID-19 deaths led to many lockdowns ) , celebrate perceived political victories ( Joe Biden supporters ) , and mourn the dead ( attendees of the funeral of Rep. John Lewis , D-GA ) .

PETITION UPDATE (12/14/2020) -
The vaccine roll out is beginning in the United States, and first responders have been tagged as those likely to be among the first to receive a vaccine.
President Trump needs to ensure that this is entirely voluntary.
Please SIGN and SHARE this petition, today!
_______________________________________________________________________
Early reports suggest that the U.S. military could be first on the list of those ordered to take a COVID vaccine.
But, no one should be forced to be vaccinated against his or her will, especially members of the U.S. military!
Military men and women, and their families, already sacrifice enough for the safety of our country. Forcing them to take an untested and unproven vaccine, against their will, would violate the spirit of their contract with America.
This petition says 'No' to treating our servicemen and women like guinea pigs with an unproven and insufficiently-tested vaccine.
Please SIGN this petition to President Trump asking him to declare, as Commander-in-Chief, that members of the armed forces will not be forced to take any COVID vaccine.
So far, big pharmaceutical companies have reported casualties and halted trials for a COVID vaccine on numerous occasions:
An AstraZeneca COVID trial participant died over the summer.
On October 12, Eli Lilly stopped a COVID antibody trial because of safety concerns.
Johnson and Johnson paused their vaccine trials on October 11 because one participant had an "unexplained" illness.
And, other AstraZeneca trials in the UK were put on hold both in July and September after participants developed a "serious neurological condition that might have been caused by the vaccine."
No one, especially in the U.S. military, should be used as a guinea pig for proving the "effectiveness" of any COVID vaccine.
Apart from these real health concerns, many military men and women object to vaccines made from aborted fetal cell lines and to other unethical testing, and these ethical considerations should also be honored.
Please SIGN and SHARE this petition which calls on President Trump, as Commander-in-Chief, to issue a declaration protecting the right of servicemen and women to exercise conscientious objection in relation to a mandate for them to take a COVID vaccine.
Just like it was essential for President Trump to nominate a new Supreme Court justice before the election, it is now essential that the President declare any vaccine to be voluntary for the military before January, just in case there is a transition to a new administration.
Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this urgent petition to President Trump, today!
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
'Why rushing a COVID vaccine will likely fail to provide a safe and effective immunity' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/why-rushing-a-covid-vaccine-will-likely-fail-to-provide-a-safe-and-effective-immunity
'Coronavirus vaccine trial volunteer dies in Brazil' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/covid-vaccine-trial-volunteer-dies-in-brazil
**Photo Credit: David Dee Delgado/Getty Images


lifesitenews--2020-11-14--Tens of thousands of Trump supporters flood streets of DC, urge pres. ‘do not quit!’ as he fights fo

Tens of thousands of Trump supporters flood streets of DC, urge pres. ‘do not quit!’ as he fights for fair election

Big Tech is censoring us .
Subscribe to our email list and bookmark LifeSiteNews.com to continue getting our news .
Subscribe now .
WASHINGTON , D.C. , November 14 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) —Tens of thousands of Trump supporters participated in today ’ s “ March for Trump , ” from Freedom Plaza close to the White House all the way to the Supreme Court , telling the public to “ stop the steal ” of this year ’ s presidential election .
LifeSite ’ s video reporter Jim Hale was on the ground .
“ I don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of people have showed up today , ” he said .
“ This is the most patriotic spot in the United States of America right now .
And the people here have come to deliver one message to President Trump : Do not quit !
” “ We support you all the way , ” one Trump supporter said .
“ Do not concede at all .
Zero .
This is going to the Supreme Court .
We are not taking what the media says for our news.
” Most media outlets called @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Saturday , projecting him to have more than the necessary 270 electoral college votes , even though presidential election has yet to be certified in his favor .
Trump , so far , has not conceded , instead launching lawsuits in multiple battleground states and questioning the accuracy of the vote count .
“ I ’ m having an issue with people complaining and sitting at home , ” another Trump supporter told LifeSiteNews .
“ I ’ m a Christian , so I want Christians to get up off their knees , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get busy.
” A number of speakers participated in the “ March for Trump , ” first at Freedom Plaza , and later at the Supreme Court .
Catholic activist and YouTuber Dr. Taylor Marshall was scheduled to deliver a message from the former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States , Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò .
“ Pro-life is the number one issue that ’ s out here , ” a Trump supporter confirmed .
“ And I think President Trump has shown that he ’ s the most pro-life … president we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more Catholic than some of the Catholics that are supposed to be Catholics , such as Biden and Pelosi.
” Another Trump supporter featured in LifeSite ’ s video report said , “ My message to President Trump is : Don ’ t give up .
Keep the fight going .
Don ’ t give up .
Do not concede .
Fight this to the death if you have to.
” “ We ’ re here supporting you , ” he added .
“ That ’ s why we held this rally .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ holding rallies across the nation in every capital .
So , keep going , push forward , don ’ t give up , because we ’ re counting on you.
” Yesterday , Trump had welcomed the support for his presidency and his legal challenges , tweeting about today ’ s event , “ I may even try to stop by and say hello.
” His motorcade did indeed stop by earlier in the day , before the “ March for Trump ” officially started at noon .
Although the president waved to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stop on his way to play golf at his club in Virginia .
Minutes ago , Trump tweeted , “ [ Fox News ] and the Fake News Networks aren ’ t showing these massive gatherings .
Instead they have their reporters standing in almost empty streets .
We now have SUPPRESSION BY THE PRESS.
” Trump confidant Steve Mosher told LifeSite ’ s John-Henry Westen yesterday that the president is gathering all the evidence needed to show massive , widespread voter fraud occurred in the 2020 presidential race .
“ They picked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bulldoze , ” Mosher said , adding that “ they ’ re not just trying to steal the election .
They ’ re trying to steal our country … if they succeed in the massive election heist that 's currently underway , we ’ ll never have another free and fair election in this country , I ’ m afraid.
” Help stop voter fraud : The Trump Campaign has created “ Defend Your Ballot ” to report election issues .
Report fraud here or call 888-630-1776 .
Project Veritas is also accepting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ says to report suspected instances of voter suppression/fraud to your local FBI field office or at tips.fbi.gov .

Trump has vowed to fight, launching lawsuits in multiple battleground states and questioning the accuracy of the vote count.
Big Tech is censoring us. Subscribe to our email list and bookmark LifeSiteNews.com to continue getting our news. Subscribe now.
WASHINGTON, D.C., November 14, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) —Tens of thousands of Trump supporters participated in today’s “March for Trump,” from Freedom Plaza close to the White House all the way to the Supreme Court, telling the public to “stop the steal” of this year’s presidential election.
LifeSite’s video reporter Jim Hale was on the ground. “I don’t know how many hundreds of thousands of people have showed up today,” he said. “This is the most patriotic spot in the United States of America right now. And the people here have come to deliver one message to President Trump: Do not quit!”
“We support you all the way,” one Trump supporter said. “Do not concede at all. Zero. This is going to the Supreme Court. We are not taking what the media says for our news.”
Most media outlets called the presidential race for Joe Biden last Saturday, projecting him to have more than the necessary 270 electoral college votes, even though presidential election has yet to be certified in his favor. Trump, so far, has not conceded, instead launching lawsuits in multiple battleground states and questioning the accuracy of the vote count.
“I’m having an issue with people complaining and sitting at home,” another Trump supporter told LifeSiteNews. “I’m a Christian, so I want Christians to get up off their knees, out of their prayer closet, and get busy.”
A number of speakers participated in the “March for Trump,” first at Freedom Plaza, and later at the Supreme Court. Catholic activist and YouTuber Dr. Taylor Marshall was scheduled to deliver a message from the former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò.
“Pro-life is the number one issue that’s out here,” a Trump supporter confirmed. “And I think President Trump has shown that he’s the most pro-life … president we’ve ever had. He acts more Catholic than some of the Catholics that are supposed to be Catholics, such as Biden and Pelosi.”
Another Trump supporter featured in LifeSite’s video report said, “My message to President Trump is: Don’t give up. Keep the fight going. Don’t give up. Do not concede. Fight this to the death if you have to.”
“We’re here supporting you,” he added. “That’s why we held this rally. That’s why we’re holding rallies across the nation in every capital. So, keep going, push forward, don’t give up, because we’re counting on you.”
Yesterday, Trump had welcomed the support for his presidency and his legal challenges, tweeting about today’s event, “I may even try to stop by and say hello.”
His motorcade did indeed stop by earlier in the day, before the “March for Trump” officially started at noon. Although the president waved to his supporters, he didn’t stop on his way to play golf at his club in Virginia.
Minutes ago, Trump tweeted, “[Fox News] and the Fake News Networks aren’t showing these massive gatherings. Instead they have their reporters standing in almost empty streets. We now have SUPPRESSION BY THE PRESS.”
.@FoxNews and the Fake News Networks aren’t showing these massive gatherings. Instead they have their reporters standing in almost empty streets. We now have SUPPRESSION BY THE PRESS. MAGA! https://t.co/RMOa4jKZwA — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 14, 2020
Trump confidant Steve Mosher told LifeSite’s John-Henry Westen yesterday that the president is gathering all the evidence needed to show massive, widespread voter fraud occurred in the 2020 presidential race.
“They picked on the wrong guy to try and bulldoze,” Mosher said, adding that “they’re not just trying to steal the election. They’re trying to steal our country … if they succeed in the massive election heist that's currently underway, we’ll never have another free and fair election in this country, I’m afraid.”
Help stop voter fraud: Project Veritas is accepting voter fraud tips here.
Share


lifesitenews--2020-11-14--Trump loyalists replace Pentagon establishment figures after Trump fires Defense chief

November 14 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) – A wave of resignations at the Pentagon have cleared the way for a dramatic shift in defense policy going into what may be the final months of Donald Trump ’ s presidency .
Trump fired Secretary of Defense Mark Esper this week , elevating National Counterterrorism Center director Christopher Miller to Acting Secretary in his place .
The president ’ s relationship with Esper has reportedly been tense for months , stemming from Esper ’ s public statements declaring he was opposed to the use of military forces to restore law and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Matter riots this summer .
Following the move , NBC News reports that numerous Pentagon officials have resigned following Esper ’ s ouster , including acting policy undersecretary James Anderson , intelligence undersecretary Joseph Kernan , and Esper chief of staff Jen Stewart .
Replacing them will be retired Army Gen. Anthony Tata , Lt. Gen Michael Flynn ’ s former aide Ezra Cohen-Watnick , and former National Security Council official Kash Patel .
Many expect the turnover to lead to an expedited withdrawal of remaining U.S. forces from Afghanistan before January 20 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in 2016 but which has been stiffly resisted by the defense establishment .
In an interview with Defense One , retiring diplomat Jim Jeffrey admits that while Trump ’ s policies “ are quite popular ” among U.S. allies in the Middle East , his team was “ always playing shell games to not make clear to our leadership how many troops we had ” in Syria .
Although most national news networks have called the race for former Vice President Joe Biden , election results have not been officially certified yet .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Wisconsin and potentially additional states , and the Trump campaign is pursuing challenges based on evidence of possible fraud in Michigan and Pennsylvania .

November 14, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – A wave of resignations at the Pentagon have cleared the way for a dramatic shift in defense policy going into what may be the final months of Donald Trump’s presidency. Trump fired Secretary of Defense Mark Esper this week, elevating National Counterterrorism Center director Christopher Miller to Acting Secretary in his place. The president’s relationship with Esper has reportedly been tense for months, stemming from Esper’s public statements declaring he was opposed to the use of military forces to restore law and order to cities consumed by Black Lives Matter riots this summer. Following the […]
November 14, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – A wave of resignations at the Pentagon have cleared the way for a dramatic shift in defense policy going into what may be the final months of Donald Trump’s presidency.
Trump fired Secretary of Defense Mark Esper this week, elevating National Counterterrorism Center director Christopher Miller to Acting Secretary in his place. The president’s relationship with Esper has reportedly been tense for months, stemming from Esper’s public statements declaring he was opposed to the use of military forces to restore law and order to cities consumed by Black Lives Matter riots this summer.
Following the move, NBC News reports that numerous Pentagon officials have resigned following Esper’s ouster, including acting policy undersecretary James Anderson, intelligence undersecretary Joseph Kernan, and Esper chief of staff Jen Stewart. Replacing them will be retired Army Gen. Anthony Tata, Lt. Gen Michael Flynn’s former aide Ezra Cohen-Watnick, and former National Security Council official Kash Patel.
Many expect the turnover to lead to an expedited withdrawal of remaining U.S. forces from Afghanistan before January 20, fulfilling a promise Trump campaigned on in 2016 but which has been stiffly resisted by the defense establishment. In an interview with Defense One, retiring diplomat Jim Jeffrey admits that while Trump’s policies “are quite popular” among U.S. allies in the Middle East, his team was “always playing shell games to not make clear to our leadership how many troops we had” in Syria.
Although most national news networks have called the race for former Vice President Joe Biden, election results have not been officially certified yet. Recounts are pending in Georgia and likely in Wisconsin and potentially additional states, and the Trump campaign is pursuing challenges based on evidence of possible fraud in Michigan and Pennsylvania.
Share


lifesitenews--2020-11-14--COVID-19 testing clarifications in response to Elon Musk statement on ‘bogus’ testing

November 14 , 2020 ( LifeSiteNews ) — Having been the main moderator of comments under LifeSite articles for several years , I was delighted to see the unusually high quality comments and discussion under yesterday ’ s report on Elon Musk ’ s rant about the apparent uselessness of current COVID-19 testing that he encountered .
A number of our readers presented commentary that really helps to better understand this complicated issue .
They were so well done that I decided to give all of our readers the opportunity to consider their helpful input .
Here 's some clarification @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tests , with different underlying principles .
Looking at them individually : 1 .
PCR takes small synthetic pieces of DNA , used as primers for a reaction that copies DNA strands .
You throw them together in a tube , let the copying reaction happen , then boil it so the strands separate .
Now you cool it again , and since you added far far more of the small synthetic primer than any sample , all DNA strands , both original and copied , stick to a primer .
You run @ @ @ @ @ @ @ let it cool again .
Each of those is one cycle , and in theory , each cycle doubles the amount of specific DNA in the sample , until there 's enough that you can visualize it .
Elon then talks about number of cycles , and that 's critical .
We used to say 25 cycles is more than enough to detect anything that 's there in meaningful quantity .
35 cycles will detect it even if there is only a single copy .
If you do n't have anything at 35 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 's fake .
Even if you see something at 35 , it 's a single copy , so it 's not replicating , so it 's not a live virus .
They say some of the tests go as high as 40 cycles , which if true , is patently absurd .
2 .
Beckton Dickinson does n't make tests like that .
They use antibodies to detect viral antigens ( proteins that stick to that antibody ) .
Pretty sure they 've adapted it to a lateral flow assay , that works @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bands on a stick .
Those tests are only as good as the antibody they 're using , and the robustness of the assay they 've built .
You ca n't generalize until you have a lot of experience seeing the limits of the test .
In principle , it can be better than PCR , because it wo n't detect a fragment of viral RNA floating around in the air , but require more respectable amounts of antigen .
If perfected , it 's the assay I would trust .
But there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all started - the test is probably a work in progress , and is not yet reliable .
Tom , great explanation - thanks for posting this .
I 've heard from a reliable source that some are going as high as 45 cycles .
Even within the designed parameters , PCR was never intended to be used to diagnose an active viral illness .
I have suspicions it is no coincidence a test that the general public , and many healthcare professionals would n't understand might be manipulated specifically to create fake @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 'm surprised this has gone so far out of the bounds of legitimate science .
Many scientific and research communities left absurd for the Twilight Zone even before this started .
As I 've maintained for months , the high error rate of the tests is the only , and most logical explanation for the chaotic statistics and analysis , conveniently science-defying explanations such as `` asymptomatic '' illness and repeat infection claims , untraceable politically reported spikes , and a never-ending pandemic that seems to ebb and flow with media-stoked fear instead @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It is grossly irresponsible to make life-altering ( or ending ) global and nation-altering decisions based on unreliable tests .
The healthcare and virology fields have destroyed their credibility .
I would n't trust the CDC , NIH , WHO or NE Journal of Medicine to accurately diagnose or report a case of hay fever at this point .
I work in a lab and the analyzer that we used was made in Wuhan and designed specifically to test for this .
The kicker is these analyzers were built before the virus supposedly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ '' thing was absurd from the start .
Even if antibodies are not a major factor with coronavirus immunity , we 've known since the '80s that T cell immunity does the heavy lifting for respiratory viruses , and that 's held up again here .
T cell immunity is relatively long-lived .
So if you 've survived , it 's because you 're immune .
If you have n't been sick and had a false positive , well , then technically you can be infected , but that 's not a repeat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ secret .
I have n't worked with viruses for close to 30 years , and yet the principles have remained the same .
From the start , it was obvious that sound science went out the window on day one , or at least by day 30 .
If the cases are exploding , why are n't we then talking about mortality rates now well below flu ?
Because the conclusion came first , and anyone wanting to remain relevant had to find a way to accommodate it .
And so , making @ @ @ @ @ @ @ scientists testify , all those persuasion techniques , are as useless as signing a petition .
Those behind the agenda are in furious overdrive making up for lost time , and do n't care how bad their loss of credibility has become .
They know their time is short .
Bogus is right .
90 % false positives according to virus/PCR experts I 've read , possibly as high as 99 % .
There is literally no way to test for Covid19 .
Whether Elon realizes it or not , he figured out @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the whole scamdemic is a completely useless test that turns colds into the illusion of a pandemic , making it impossible to treat the few thousand who might actually have Covid19 .
With a test that bad , one person could test positive off and on for the rest of their lives - a viral impossibility if you have an immune system .
Or you could just flip a coin for any virus that suits you , and call yourself `` Contagion-fluid '' .It is comforting knowing our healthcare industry is so obsessed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get proper treatment for anything else .
I guess that was part of the plan though .
“ It is comforting knowing our healthcare industry is so obsessed with Covid , that you might not get proper treatment for anything else.
“ Someone I know has a family member who recently died of a pulmonary embolism after having surgery because the doctor would not see him unless he got a negative covid test , even though he got a negative result from a test right before having the surgery .
He died after @ @ @ @ @ @ @ results .
He started having shortness of breath so the doctor assumed it would be covid , seemingly without considering the fact that there are numerous reasons to have shortness of breath , including pulmonary embolism , which is a real risk after the surgery he had !
His wife is pursuing a malpractice lawsuit and I hope she wins .
To make it worse , they had a baby a few months ago who will now grow up not knowing her father all because the doctor was too much of a coward @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it ’ s so irritating to see people calling healthcare workers “ heroes ” when so many of them won ’ t see you if you have any covid symptoms at all or unless you have a negative result after being tested first .
I realize not all healthcare workers are doing that , but many are .
I am a healthcare worker myself and have noticed that happening among many doctor ’ s offices that I communicate with .
Just think of how many people have died and will die soon because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ various other diseases due to their doctors refusing to see them .
It ’ s absolutely maddening .
That is absolutely horrible .
I also hope his wife wins and the doctor loses his license .
The `` A hero lives here '' signs are in several yards in our neighborhood .
They are infuriating , given the many examples like yours .
Our governor had been frequently referring to a 43 year old woman `` who is dying of covid '' as his poster-case to scare us .
What he has n't @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a large lung tumor , but they would n't operate at first , out of fear of the covid-impact .
Instead they just put her on a respirator , which as we know has a very high death rate .
Now she is too fragile to operate to remove the tumor , and last I heard , she was going down hill .
They are literally killing her out of fear and mistreatment .
I hope the family realizes what the hospital and governor have done and sue .
There was a man @ @ @ @ @ @ @ while working his farm .
No symptoms of anything prior .
His family was called by the state and told he had Covid ( tested postmortem , without permission ) and they should not attend or have others attend the funeral due to the risk of infection from a non-breathing man ( interesting how the method of infection changes to fit the circumstance ) .
They had to meet attenders at the door of the funeral home and explain that the state had lied .
Not what a family should have to do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one .
These are all very serious malpractice cases , and in many incidences , crimes against humanity as well .
This is all completely demonic .

November 14, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — Having been the main moderator of comments under LifeSite articles for several years, I was delighted to see the unusually high quality comments and discussion under yesterday’s report on Elon Musk’s rant about the apparent uselessness of current COVID-19 testing that he encountered.
A number of our readers presented commentary that really helps to better understand this complicated issue. They were so well done that I decided to give all of our readers the opportunity to consider their helpful input.
Enjoy,
Steve Jalsevac
Here's some clarification – PCR and antigen detection are separate tests, with different underlying principles. Looking at them individually:
1. PCR takes small synthetic pieces of DNA, used as primers for a reaction that copies DNA strands. You throw them together in a tube, let the copying reaction happen, then boil it so the strands separate. Now you cool it again, and since you added far far more of the small synthetic primer than any sample, all DNA strands, both original and copied, stick to a primer. You run the reaction again, boil again, let it cool again. Each of those is one cycle, and in theory, each cycle doubles the amount of specific DNA in the sample, until there's enough that you can visualize it. Elon then talks about number of cycles, and that's critical. We used to say 25 cycles is more than enough to detect anything that's there in meaningful quantity. 35 cycles will detect it even if there is only a single copy. If you don't have anything at 35 and get something after that, it's fake. Even if you see something at 35, it's a single copy, so it's not replicating, so it's not a live virus. They say some of the tests go as high as 40 cycles, which if true, is patently absurd.
2. Beckton Dickinson doesn't make tests like that. They use antibodies to detect viral antigens (proteins that stick to that antibody). Pretty sure they've adapted it to a lateral flow assay, that works like a pregnancy test, leaving little bands on a stick. Those tests are only as good as the antibody they're using, and the robustness of the assay they've built. You can't generalize until you have a lot of experience seeing the limits of the test. In principle, it can be better than PCR, because it won't detect a fragment of viral RNA floating around in the air, but require more respectable amounts of antigen. If perfected, it's the assay I would trust. But there hasn't been enough time since this all started – the test is probably a work in progress, and is not yet reliable.
Tom, great explanation – thanks for posting this. I've heard from a reliable source that some are going as high as 45 cycles. Even within the designed parameters, PCR was never intended to be used to diagnose an active viral illness. I have suspicions it is no coincidence a test that the general public, and many healthcare professionals wouldn't understand might be manipulated specifically to create fake cases. I can't say I'm surprised this has gone so far out of the bounds of legitimate science. Many scientific and research communities left absurd for the Twilight Zone even before this started.
As I've maintained for months, the high error rate of the tests is the only, and most logical explanation for the chaotic statistics and analysis, conveniently science-defying explanations such as “asymptomatic” illness and repeat infection claims, untraceable politically reported spikes, and a never-ending pandemic that seems to ebb and flow with media-stoked fear instead of historic pandemic and human behaviors.
It is grossly irresponsible to make life-altering (or ending) global and nation-altering decisions based on unreliable tests. The healthcare and virology fields have destroyed their credibility. I wouldn't trust the CDC, NIH, WHO or NE Journal of Medicine to accurately diagnose or report a case of hay fever at this point.
I work in a lab and the analyzer that we used was made in Wuhan and designed specifically to test for this . The kicker is these analyzers were built before the virus supposedly even existed.
The “repeat infection” thing was absurd from the start. Even if antibodies are not a major factor with coronavirus immunity, we've known since the '80s that T cell immunity does the heavy lifting for respiratory viruses, and that's held up again here. T cell immunity is relatively long-lived. So if you've survived, it's because you're immune. If you haven't been sick and had a false positive, well, then technically you can be infected, but that's not a repeat infection.
None of this is a secret. I haven't worked with viruses for close to 30 years, and yet the principles have remained the same. From the start, it was obvious that sound science went out the window on day one, or at least by day 30. If the cases are exploding, why aren't we then talking about mortality rates now well below flu? Because the conclusion came first, and anyone wanting to remain relevant had to find a way to accommodate it. And so, making a scientific case, having doctors or scientists testify, all those persuasion techniques, are as useless as signing a petition. Those behind the agenda are in furious overdrive making up for lost time, and don't care how bad their loss of credibility has become. They know their time is short.
Bogus is right. 90% false positives according to virus/PCR experts I've read, possibly as high as 99%. There is literally no way to test for Covid19. Whether Elon realizes it or not, he figured out the fundamental problem: the foundation of the whole scamdemic is a completely useless test that turns colds into the illusion of a pandemic, making it impossible to treat the few thousand who might actually have Covid19. With a test that bad, one person could test positive off and on for the rest of their lives – a viral impossibility if you have an immune system. Or you could just flip a coin for any virus that suits you, and call yourself “Contagion-fluid”.It is comforting knowing our healthcare industry is so obsessed with Covid, that you might not get proper treatment for anything else. I guess that was part of the plan though.
“It is comforting knowing our healthcare industry is so obsessed with Covid, that you might not get proper treatment for anything else.“
Someone I know has a family member who recently died of a pulmonary embolism after having surgery because the doctor would not see him unless he got a negative covid test, even though he got a negative result from a test right before having the surgery. He died after getting that second test while awaiting the results. He started having shortness of breath so the doctor assumed it would be covid, seemingly without considering the fact that there are numerous reasons to have shortness of breath, including pulmonary embolism, which is a real risk after the surgery he had! His wife is pursuing a malpractice lawsuit and I hope she wins. To make it worse, they had a baby a few months ago who will now grow up not knowing her father all because the doctor was too much of a coward to see him.
This is why it’s so irritating to see people calling healthcare workers “heroes” when so many of them won’t see you if you have any covid symptoms at all or unless you have a negative result after being tested first. I realize not all healthcare workers are doing that, but many are. I am a healthcare worker myself and have noticed that happening among many doctor’s offices that I communicate with. Just think of how many people have died and will die soon because they can’t get treated for various other diseases due to their doctors refusing to see them. It’s absolutely maddening.
luxsit Cassie • 7 hours ago
That is absolutely horrible. I also hope his wife wins and the doctor loses his license. The “A hero lives here” signs are in several yards in our neighborhood. They are infuriating, given the many examples like yours. Our governor had been frequently referring to a 43 year old woman “who is dying of covid” as his poster-case to scare us. What he hasn't told the public is that she has a large lung tumor, but they wouldn't operate at first, out of fear of the covid-impact. Instead they just put her on a respirator, which as we know has a very high death rate. Now she is too fragile to operate to remove the tumor, and last I heard, she was going down hill. They are literally killing her out of fear and mistreatment. I hope the family realizes what the hospital and governor have done and sue.
There was a man here who died of a heart attack while working his farm. No symptoms of anything prior. His family was called by the state and told he had Covid (tested postmortem, without permission) and they should not attend or have others attend the funeral due to the risk of infection from a non-breathing man (interesting how the method of infection changes to fit the circumstance). They had to meet attenders at the door of the funeral home and explain that the state had lied. Not what a family should have to do when mourning the loss of a loved one.
These are all very serious malpractice cases, and in many incidences, crimes against humanity as well. This is all completely demonic.
Follow Steve Steve is the co-founder and managing director of LifeSiteNews.com.
Share