redoubtnews--2020-06-23--Globalization – Pure Evil

Globalization – Pure Evil

System Innovations ( SI ) is an online platform that tackles complex problems through systems science and technologies , changing the structure of a system rather than through individual parts .
Some of these systems include agriculture , education , and transportation from “ around the world ” .
Members include individuals from many countries and large U.S. cities such as New York , Seattle , and San Francisco .
This organization intends to “ ReThink everything ” , including the social , health , financial , urban , security , energy , water , and even political systems of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ become an excuse to “ ReThink ” everything .
No small coincidence there .
Networking all of these systems and players together is the goal of SI .
While this organization claims it loves “ detailed outcomes ” that an “ organization could control ” , its job “ is not to control and specify everything , but more to create the conditions for the desired outcomes to emerge ” .
What an oxymoron .
In general a systems approach is pretty abstract and complex .
This organization ’ s goal is to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ network them together for the benefit of all .
These hoaxers are talking about “ networking ” parts of the world together for a fully functional unit , implying that the world does not currently function as a unit .
In their scheme , there is no separation of parts such as nations , resources , or individualism , since they are just insignificant parts of the whole .
As Aristotle said “ the whole is greater than the sum of its parts ” .
Collectivism .
What they are really talking about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
SI released a video , “ Globalization ” , The Rise of Networks .
Listening to the video itself is somewhat mesmerizing , distracting with mood music and some pretty spectacular photography , however it gives a clear picture of how a traditional free market economy is being transformed into a global digital economy that has no national boundaries .
While the reader is encouraged to watch the video to fully understand how globalism is being established and the ramifications for us , here is a summary of their mission .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ how the economy has been dominated by a capitalist free market system for decades .
With industrialization and advanced transportation systems , the economy became more global over time .
In the latter part of the 20th century , with the removal of trade barriers , creation of global supply chains , outsourcing , and enhanced communications through the internet , more global economic “ connectivity ” was enabled .
This global economic connectivity over the last couple of decades has led to a single global economy exchange .
Through the internet , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Exchanges of data across the internet has enabled “ the sustained coordination of human activity “ , with digital platforms coordinating the economy and society .
This is also defined as a digital model of globalization in which the UN is actively engaged for its Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals .
According to SI , a global organization is being formed with advanced technology and the “ end game ” for globalization is “ coming into focus ” .
Called the “ decentralized web ” , economic activity will be decentralized , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a collection of computers to work as a single cloud computer .
With this , and through the Internet of Things ( IoT ) , the world can be quantified and markets can be built for any “ resource that needs managing “ , including humans .
The same solutions for any societal problems can be applied anywhere in the world , disrupting “ the centuries old structures that carved up the planet into separate jurisdictions and societies “ .
In digital globalization , the internet is used to create network platforms that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , comprised of individuals from corporations , education , research , engineering , financing , and other fields .
Rather than relying on the expertise and wisdom of citizens , the world will be managed through these network platforms , with all “ solutions ” determined by technocrats .
As seen in this SI video , ReThink Everything , all sectors of human activity are included and align with Agenda 2030 SDGs .
SI effectively summarized its globalization concept that will be accomplished through digital technology .
While it is recommended that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more comprehensive understanding of how we are being forced into globalism , this is a shorter version that gives a basic view of how technology is being used to globalize our world .
This explains why there is so much emphasis on data collection and why the CARES Act is funding the installation of 5G .
The Agenda 2030 SDG captures every aspect of life .
These platforms will create networks that include technocrats from every walk in life .
Sharing information on these platforms at a global scale , technocrats will provide @ @ @ @ @ @ @ IoT is the mechanism that provides the collection and sharing of data , the “ connectivity ” .
Collected data can then be included on the platforms .
National governments will only be used as patsy ’ s , political buffoons who believe they are serving us best with expert decisions .
Representation of the people will no longer exist as these technocrats will provide the solutions , which is currently happening with COVID19 .
Using the SDG 3.b for vaccines as an example , vaccination data is shared with a state agency @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the federal government such as with the Center for Disease Control ( CDC ) .
A network platform of medical and pharmaceutical technocrats can analyze this information along with other data and determine if the vaccine is effective , compliance rates and where those rates are low , which provider isn ’ t complying with vaccine recommendations , and even which parent isn ’ t vaccinating their child .
Every aspect of vaccinations can be analyzed through the network platform .
Once a vaccination problem is identified the healthcare technocrats will develop a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and selling more vaccines .
Resource production and allocation is also very much at the center of this globalization .
Technocrats in the network platforms for the agriculture sector will have the ability to monitor food production and quality , consumption , areas deficient in food sources , and how food allocations should be changed on a global level .
Food overgrown in one area of the world and allocated to another part of the world can easily be decided by these technocrats .
All control over food production and allocation will be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and humans .
More sustainable agricultural practices and equitable distribution will contribute to economic development .
These are only two examples of how technocracy , the control of a society by technical experts or technocrats , will be implemented through digital globalization , which in turn meets the UN SDG objectives .
Governments will adopt solutions created by these network platform technocrats .
Digital technology gives technocrats the ability to gather and data , create solutions .
and monitor the effectiveness of those solutions .
This will not only globalize the world @ @ @ @ @ @ @ individualism , and national sovereignty .
Humans become nothing more than their pawns in a technocratic world , meeting economic development needs .
Seven years ago a former Soviet KGB agent , Yuri Bezmenov , talked about the stages of destroying a country .
It appears the COVID19 “ crisis ” is the tool being used to create a “ new normal ” as described in Stage Three .
When will Stage Four occur ?
Perhaps when technocrats have succeeded in laying their foundation with 5G .
Globalism is evil .
It takes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lifeless cubicle in which it is expected every human will live and behave the same , all for the purposes of serving the global elite .
If there is ever a time that Americans need to come together , it is now , to save our Republic .
There is little time left .
The views , opinions , or positions expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone , and do not necessarily reflect the views , opinions , positions of Redoubt News .
Social Media , including Facebook @ @ @ @ @ @ @ content to our readers ’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting Main Stream Media sources .
This is called ‘ Shadow-banning ’ .
Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family .
Thank you.Please support our coverage of your rights .
Donate here : Paypal.me/RedoubtNews

Globalization – Pure Evil
by Karen Schumacher
System Innovations (SI) is an online platform that tackles complex problems through systems science and technologies, changing the structure of a system rather than through individual parts. Some of these systems include agriculture, education, and transportation from “around the world”. Members include individuals from many countries and large U.S. cities such as New York, Seattle, and San Francisco. This organization intends to “ReThink everything”, including the social, health, financial, urban, security, energy, water, and even political systems of the world. COVID19 itself has even become an excuse to “ReThink” everything. No small coincidence there. Networking all of these systems and players together is the goal of SI.
While this organization claims it loves “detailed outcomes” that an “organization could control”, its job “is not to control and specify everything, but more to create the conditions for the desired outcomes to emerge”. What an oxymoron.
In general a systems approach is pretty abstract and complex. This organization’s goal is to take all aspects of the world and network them together for the benefit of all. These hoaxers are talking about “networking” parts of the world together for a fully functional unit, implying that the world does not currently function as a unit. In their scheme, there is no separation of parts such as nations, resources, or individualism, since they are just insignificant parts of the whole. As Aristotle said “the whole is greater than the sum of its parts”. Collectivism. What they are really talking about is globalism and how to manage it.
SI released a video, “Globalization”, The Rise of Networks. Listening to the video itself is somewhat mesmerizing, distracting with mood music and some pretty spectacular photography, however it gives a clear picture of how a traditional free market economy is being transformed into a global digital economy that has no national boundaries.
While the reader is encouraged to watch the video to fully understand how globalism is being established and the ramifications for us, here is a summary of their mission.
It is about the economy. SI explains how the economy has been dominated by a capitalist free market system for decades. With industrialization and advanced transportation systems, the economy became more global over time. In the latter part of the 20th century, with the removal of trade barriers, creation of global supply chains, outsourcing, and enhanced communications through the internet, more global economic “connectivity” was enabled. This global economic connectivity over the last couple of decades has led to a single global economy exchange.
Through the internet, globalization has been taken to new levels. Exchanges of data across the internet has enabled “the sustained coordination of human activity“, with digital platforms coordinating the economy and society. This is also defined as a digital model of globalization in which the UN is actively engaged for its Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals.
According to SI, a global organization is being formed with advanced technology and the “end game” for globalization is “coming into focus”. Called the “decentralized web”, economic activity will be decentralized, shifting operations to global based networks allowing a collection of computers to work as a single cloud computer. With this, and through the Internet of Things (IoT), the world can be quantified and markets can be built for any “resource that needs managing“, including humans. The same solutions for any societal problems can be applied anywhere in the world, disrupting “the centuries old structures that carved up the planet into separate jurisdictions and societies“.
In digital globalization, the internet is used to create network platforms that are managed by experts, or technocrats, comprised of individuals from corporations, education, research, engineering, financing, and other fields. Rather than relying on the expertise and wisdom of citizens, the world will be managed through these network platforms, with all “solutions” determined by technocrats. As seen in this SI video, ReThink Everything, all sectors of human activity are included and align with Agenda 2030 SDGs.
SI effectively summarized its globalization concept that will be accomplished through digital technology. While it is recommended that the full video is watched to give a more comprehensive understanding of how we are being forced into globalism, this is a shorter version that gives a basic view of how technology is being used to globalize our world. This explains why there is so much emphasis on data collection and why the CARES Act is funding the installation of 5G.
The Agenda 2030 SDG captures every aspect of life. These platforms will create networks that include technocrats from every walk in life. Sharing information on these platforms at a global scale, technocrats will provide solutions that meet the SDG goals. IoT is the mechanism that provides the collection and sharing of data, the “connectivity”. Collected data can then be included on the platforms. National governments will only be used as patsy’s, political buffoons who believe they are serving us best with expert decisions. Representation of the people will no longer exist as these technocrats will provide the solutions, which is currently happening with COVID19.
Using the SDG 3.b for vaccines as an example, vaccination data is shared with a state agency, which in turn shares it with the federal government such as with the Center for Disease Control (CDC). A network platform of medical and pharmaceutical technocrats can analyze this information along with other data and determine if the vaccine is effective, compliance rates and where those rates are low, which provider isn’t complying with vaccine recommendations, and even which parent isn’t vaccinating their child. Every aspect of vaccinations can be analyzed through the network platform. Once a vaccination problem is identified the healthcare technocrats will develop a solution. The economy benefits by producing and selling more vaccines.
Resource production and allocation is also very much at the center of this globalization. Technocrats in the network platforms for the agriculture sector will have the ability to monitor food production and quality, consumption, areas deficient in food sources, and how food allocations should be changed on a global level. Food overgrown in one area of the world and allocated to another part of the world can easily be decided by these technocrats. All control over food production and allocation will be taken out of the hands of nations, and humans. More sustainable agricultural practices and equitable distribution will contribute to economic development.
These are only two examples of how technocracy, the control of a society by technical experts or technocrats, will be implemented through digital globalization, which in turn meets the UN SDG objectives. Governments will adopt solutions created by these network platform technocrats. Digital technology gives technocrats the ability to gather and data, create solutions. and monitor the effectiveness of those solutions. This will not only globalize the world but it also removes all freedom, individualism, and national sovereignty. Humans become nothing more than their pawns in a technocratic world, meeting economic development needs.
Seven years ago a former Soviet KGB agent, Yuri Bezmenov, talked about the stages of destroying a country. It appears the COVID19 “crisis” is the tool being used to create a “new normal” as described in Stage Three. When will Stage Four occur? Perhaps when technocrats have succeeded in laying their foundation with 5G.
Globalism is evil. It takes precious freedoms and individualism, creates a lifeless cubicle in which it is expected every human will live and behave the same, all for the purposes of serving the global elite. If there is ever a time that Americans need to come together, it is now, to save our Republic. There is little time left.
The views, opinions, or positions expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, positions of Redoubt News. Social Media, including Facebook, has greatly diminished distribution of our content to our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting Main Stream Media sources. This is called ‘Shadow-banning’. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here: Paypal.me/RedoubtNews


redoubtnews--2020-06-23--IFF Aligns With Conservative Principles

IFF Aligns With Conservative Principles

Later this month , Republicans state-wide will gather for their convention to elect leaders and once again adopt their Idaho Republican Party Platform ( IRPP ) .
Many people don ’ t realize grass roots Republicans review and approve the IRPP every summer before a fall general election because the IRPP serves as the gold standard for Republican beliefs ahead of a general election .
I recently wrote an article about how the first four principles of the Idaho Freedom Foundation Index ( IFFI ) used to grade proposed legislation closely resemble portions of the IRPP .
This article addresses @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and shows they too align closely with the principles found in the IRPP .
Let ’ s look at the second four principles of the IFFI used to grade proposed legislation and compare them to the IRPP .
The fifth principle asks , “ Does it directly or indirectly create or increase any taxes , fees , or other assessments ?
” This principle is similar to the IRPP , which states , “ We support lower federal , state and local taxes .
High taxes are a burden on businesses , families @ @ @ @ @ @ @ legislation and legislators who increase taxes oppose the IRPP .
The fifth principle of the IFFI identifies legislators committed to lower taxes and exposes those who are not .
The sixth principle asks , “ Does it increase government redistribution of wealth ?
” This principle is also similar to the IRPP , which states , “ Municipal laws that allow public dollars to be converted to private use and government entities to compete against the private sector or divert public money to special projects without the support of the taxpayer must be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from liberals that the benevolent hand of government must take from some and redistribute to others .
You might remember Barack Obama saying , “ I actually believe in redistribution , at least at a certain level , to make sure everybody ’ s got a shot.
” The IFFI exposes wealth redistribution legislation and grades it negatively because redistribution unfairly takes from those who have earned it and gives to those who have not .
Eventually , those who get redistributed wealth feel entitled while those who pay feel resentment .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ increase government spending ( for objectionable purposes ) or debt ?
” This is a big one for the IRPP .
Its Preamble states , “ We believe Government must practice fiscal responsibility , and that taxpayers should allow the Government only money necessary to provide appropriate functions.
” The IFFI and the IRPP both disapprove of wasteful government spending .
The eighth principle asks , “ Does it in any way restrict public access to information related to government activity or otherwise compromise government transparency or accountability ?
” Similarly , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ transparency that allows the public to review all local , state and federal government expenditures , contracts and audits online.
” Both the IFFI and the IRPP believe in government transparency .
The IFFI identifies legislation that “ hides the ball ” for government activity and those legislators who support this kind of bad legislation .
IFFI principles closely align with IRPP principles that serve as the gold standard for Idaho Republicans .
The IFFI identifies legislation that opposes traditional Republican principles and also those legislators who oppose these principles .
Bryan Smith @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the state Republican Party .
He also serves as a board member on the Idaho Freedom Foundation .
The views , opinions , or positions expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone , and do not necessarily reflect the views , opinions , positions of Redoubt News .
Social Media , including Facebook , has greatly diminished distribution of our content to our readers ’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting Main Stream Media sources .
This is called ‘ Shadow-banning ’ .
Please take a moment and consider sharing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Thank you .
Please support our coverage of your rights .
Donate here : paypal.me/RedoubtNews

IFF Aligns With Conservative Principles
Editorial by Bryan Smith
Later this month, Republicans state-wide will gather for their convention to elect leaders and once again adopt their Idaho Republican Party Platform (IRPP). Many people don’t realize grass roots Republicans review and approve the IRPP every summer before a fall general election because the IRPP serves as the gold standard for Republican beliefs ahead of a general election.
I recently wrote an article about how the first four principles of the Idaho Freedom Foundation Index (IFFI) used to grade proposed legislation closely resemble portions of the IRPP. This article addresses the next four principles of the IFFI and shows they too align closely with the principles found in the IRPP. Let’s look at the second four principles of the IFFI used to grade proposed legislation and compare them to the IRPP.
The fifth principle asks, “Does it directly or indirectly create or increase any taxes, fees, or other assessments?” This principle is similar to the IRPP, which states, “We support lower federal, state and local taxes. High taxes are a burden on businesses, families and individuals.”
Individuals who oppose grading legislation and legislators who increase taxes oppose the IRPP. The fifth principle of the IFFI identifies legislators committed to lower taxes and exposes those who are not.
The sixth principle asks, “Does it increase government redistribution of wealth?” This principle is also similar to the IRPP, which states, “Municipal laws that allow public dollars to be converted to private use and government entities to compete against the private sector or divert public money to special projects without the support of the taxpayer must be repealed.”
We hear more and more from liberals that the benevolent hand of government must take from some and redistribute to others. You might remember Barack Obama saying, “I actually believe in redistribution, at least at a certain level, to make sure everybody’s got a shot.” The IFFI exposes wealth redistribution legislation and grades it negatively because redistribution unfairly takes from those who have earned it and gives to those who have not. Eventually, those who get redistributed wealth feel entitled while those who pay feel resentment.
The seventh principle asks, “Does it increase government spending (for objectionable purposes) or debt?” This is a big one for the IRPP. Its Preamble states, “We believe Government must practice fiscal responsibility, and that taxpayers should allow the Government only money necessary to provide appropriate functions.”
The IFFI and the IRPP both disapprove of wasteful government spending.
The eighth principle asks, “Does it in any way restrict public access to information related to government activity or otherwise compromise government transparency or accountability?” Similarly, the IRPP states, “We support Government transparency that allows the public to review all local, state and federal government expenditures, contracts and audits online.”
Both the IFFI and the IRPP believe in government transparency. The IFFI identifies legislation that “hides the ball” for government activity and those legislators who support this kind of bad legislation.
IFFI principles closely align with IRPP principles that serve as the gold standard for Idaho Republicans. The IFFI identifies legislation that opposes traditional Republican principles and also those legislators who oppose these principles.
Bryan Smith serves as the second vice chairman of the state Republican Party. He also serves as a board member on the Idaho Freedom Foundation.
The views, opinions, or positions expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, positions of Redoubt News. Social Media, including Facebook, has greatly diminished distribution of our content to our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting Main Stream Media sources. This is called ‘Shadow-banning’. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you. Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here: paypal.me/RedoubtNews


redoubtnews--2020-06-24--Democrats Proxy Voting Scheme

Democrats Proxy Voting Scheme

As the dust was still settling on September 12 , 2001 , and the horror of the day prior ’ s events were still being discovered , the 107th Congress did not stay home .
The 65th Congress did not stay home during the Spanish Flu , nor did the 81st during the worst of the Polio outbreak .
The 37th Congress met while our country was engaged in Civil War .
The 65th and 77th Congress carried on after the United States entered WWI and WWII , respectively .
In May , 2020 , Speaker Pelosi forced through Congress @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the first time in history , eliminates meaningful debate , requires only 20 Members present ( out of 435 ) for bill passage , and allows Members to stay home collecting a paycheck while she votes for them .
At the time of writing this , 74 Democrat Members have opted-in to this and handed over their voting card .
The growing list of those Members can be found on the House Clerk ’ s website here : No matter the situation , I do my best to represent the ideals and priorities @ @ @ @ @ @ @ House .
The people of Idaho ’ s First District elected me – not someone else holding my voting card — to represent them in Congress .
Some of you remember Newt Gingrich ’ s “ Contract for America ” – and you may also remember one of his platforms that resonated with many Americans : eliminate the ability for Republican to vote by proxy .
This was important because people want their Representative to show up and do what they were elected to do– not hand their responsibility to someone else .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ proxy voting to the House of Representatives as a whole .
This applies to the entire ( 435 Member ) House… a body that votes to enact laws… not just a 30-member committee reviewing potential legislation .
This was supposedly done “ for the safety of members during a pandemic , ” but I don ’ t believe Speaker Pelosi is concerned about my health or that of my colleagues .
Her real motive is to remove some “ complications ” of the law-making process , empowering her to negotiate policy with less @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to avoid dealing with critical issues facing our nation prior to the November election .
It ’ s a shame to see this centuries-old precedent broken for the sake of political gain , and it is a shame we must resort to legal action to rectify it .
Earlier last month , I joined a lawsuit to challenge the constitutionality of the ‘ proxy voting ’ process .
Every day all over America – plans are formulated by organizations so they can function in safe and practical ways .
During this time , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ successful procedures have been established in Congress to keep Members safe .
As public servants , it is not acceptable to continue delaying our work or handing over our duties to someone else .
For 231 years , Congress has found a way to meet and do the job they were elected to do .
This current path of ‘ absent representation ’ can not stand .
The views , opinions , or positions expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone , and do not necessarily reflect the views @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Social Media , including Facebook , has greatly diminished distribution of our content to our readers ’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting Main Stream Media sources .
This is called ‘ Shadow-banning ’ .
Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family .
Thank you .
Please support our coverage of your rights .
Donate here : paypal.me/RedoubtNews

Democrats Proxy Voting Scheme
Guest Editorial by Rep. Russ Fulcher
As the dust was still settling on September 12, 2001, and the horror of the day prior’s events were still being discovered, the 107th Congress did not stay home. The 65th Congress did not stay home during the Spanish Flu, nor did the 81st during the worst of the Polio outbreak. The 37th Congress met while our country was engaged in Civil War. The 65th and 77th Congress carried on after the United States entered WWI and WWII, respectively.
In May, 2020, Speaker Pelosi forced through Congress a proxy voting scheme that, for the first time in history, eliminates meaningful debate, requires only 20 Members present (out of 435) for bill passage, and allows Members to stay home collecting a paycheck while she votes for them. At the time of writing this, 74 Democrat Members have opted-in to this and handed over their voting card. The growing list of those Members can be found on the House Clerk’s website here: https://clerkpreview.house.gov/ProxyLetter
No matter the situation, I do my best to represent the ideals and priorities of Idahoans, particularly in a Democrat-controlled House. The people of Idaho’s First District elected me – not someone else holding my voting card — to represent them in Congress.
Some of you remember Newt Gingrich’s “Contract for America”– and you may also remember one of his platforms that resonated with many Americans: eliminate the ability for Republican Committees to vote by proxy. This was important because people want their Representative to show up and do what they were elected to do– not hand their responsibility to someone else.
But now, Speaker Pelosi has brought proxy voting to the House of Representatives as a whole. This applies to the entire (435 Member) House… a body that votes to enact laws… not just a 30-member committee reviewing potential legislation. This was supposedly done “for the safety of members during a pandemic,” but I don’t believe Speaker Pelosi is concerned about my health or that of my colleagues. Her real motive is to remove some “complications” of the law-making process, empowering her to negotiate policy with less interference, and to make it easier to avoid dealing with critical issues facing our nation prior to the November election.
It’s a shame to see this centuries-old precedent broken for the sake of political gain, and it is a shame we must resort to legal action to rectify it. Earlier last month, I joined a lawsuit to challenge the constitutionality of the ‘proxy voting’ process.
Every day all over America – plans are formulated by organizations so they can function in safe and practical ways. During this time, the Senate has remained in session and successful procedures have been established in Congress to keep Members safe.
As public servants, it is not acceptable to continue delaying our work or handing over our duties to someone else. For 231 years, Congress has found a way to meet and do the job they were elected to do. This current path of ‘absent representation’ cannot stand.
The views, opinions, or positions expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, positions of Redoubt News. Social Media, including Facebook, has greatly diminished distribution of our content to our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting Main Stream Media sources. This is called ‘Shadow-banning’. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you. Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here: paypal.me/RedoubtNews


redoubtnews--2020-06-24--Bubba Wallace – The Rest of the Story

Bubba Wallace – The Rest of the Story

Bubba Wallace – The Rest of the Story Bubba Wallace , the only black professional driver for NASCAR , made headlines recently when he claimed that a noose was found in his team ’ s garage stall at Talladega Superspeedway .
Wallace called the situation a “ despicable act of racism and hatred ” This charge was taken very seriously by NASCAR officials , as it should have been .
They launched an immediate investigation and called the FBI to take charge .
NASCAR then made their support of Wallace a promotional event , with drivers and their teams walking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ officials adding “ # IStandWithBubba ” in white paint on the track ’ s grass .
Wallace was moved to tears by the show of support .
In spite of the hoopla , the FBI investigation determined that the “ noose ” was actually a pull down cord for the garage door , and was never a racist statement , or threat , made to Wallace .
There was no racist act committed .
Period .
Done .
The entire thing should have been left to disappear at this point , but Bubba @ @ @ @ @ @ @ let his moment in the sun fade away .
As he said to Don Lemon during a CNN interview , “ I will always have the motivators to go out there , to try to de-throne me from the pedestal I am on.
” Since poor Bubba could not let it go , let ’ s look at THE REST OF THE STORY… .
During the recent lockdown , NASCAR was put in a bit of a predicament , as were many businesses .
How to keep afloat and keep viewers interested .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ and very creative I might add .
They went to virtual racing .
The eNASCAR iRacing Pro Invitational Series , which essentially features a bunch of NASCAR drivers racing one another in a video game simulation .
However , Bubba had probably the worst day of everyone playing , and showed his true colors when he threw a tantrum .
Wallace quit the race in a huff after an early wreck with Clint Bowyer Bubba Wallace was one of the 32 drivers competing in the Food City Showdown at a virtual Bristol Motor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the worst day of anyone in the field .
Not only did Wallace wreck during the 11th lap of the 150-lap race but he was so peeved by it that he wound up “ rage-quitting ” — a popular gamer term for a player who gets so angry that they prematurely bow out of the competition .
Bubba was not doing so well with the fans or the sponsors after this .
How would he regain all that he lost during that fit of temper ?
How would he make people forget his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to NASCAR about the Confederate flags being displayed at the racetracks .
This gained him the adoration of the Left .
NASCAR fell right into the trap and ordered these heritage symbols to be banned .
What they seem to have forgotten is that this is a Southern Sport , with most participants being Southern .
And these good ole boys have a sense of pride in their heritage , with includes what some folks call the Confederate flag , but is actually the Battle Flag of the Army of Northern Virginia .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Left have twisted it to mean something nefarious , and insist that no one is allowed to have any Southern Pride .
So , while he gained the love of the extremists on the Left , he lost the support of the conservative Southern Right .
But someone on his team seemed to have thought about the fact that no one , left or right , likes the idea of lynchings .
Talladega provided the perfect opportunity to paint poor Bubba as the victim of a hate crime .
( Yes , that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bubba again . )
That is when the “ noose ” hit the headlines .
It will be interesting to see how NASCAR responds ; but the clarity of the situation is beyond debate .
This “ noose in a NASCAR garage ” story was false .
This was not targeted racial hate toward Bubba Wallace ; and it wasn ’ t even a noose in a NASCAR garage .
If it had been determined to be an actual hate crime against poor Bubba , everyone would have been on his side and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he so desperately craves .
However , it was not .
And many have said that they thought this whole situation was just so stinky that they could just “ Smollett ” .
Yes , the truth matters , and now it is coming to light .
The views , opinions , or positions expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone , and do not necessarily reflect the views , opinions , positions of Redoubt News .
Social Media , including Facebook , has greatly diminished distribution of our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is instead promoting Main Stream Media sources .
This is called ‘ Shadow-banning ’ .
Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family .
Thank you .
Please support our coverage of your rights .
Donate here : paypal.me/RedoubtNews

Bubba Wallace – The Rest of the Story
by Shari Dovale
Bubba Wallace, the only black professional driver for NASCAR, made headlines recently when he claimed that a noose was found in his team’s garage stall at Talladega Superspeedway.
Wallace called the situation a “despicable act of racism and hatred”
This charge was taken very seriously by NASCAR officials, as it should have been. They launched an immediate investigation and called the FBI to take charge.
NASCAR then made their support of Wallace a promotional event, with drivers and their teams walking with Wallace on the speedway, and officials adding “#IStandWithBubba” in white paint on the track’s grass. Wallace was moved to tears by the show of support.
In spite of the hoopla, the FBI investigation determined that the “noose” was actually a pull down cord for the garage door, and was never a racist statement, or threat, made to Wallace. There was no racist act committed. Period. Done.
The entire thing should have been left to disappear at this point, but Bubba, like Jussie Smollett, could not let his moment in the sun fade away.
As he said to Don Lemon during a CNN interview, “I will always have the motivators to go out there, to try to de-throne me from the pedestal I am on.”
Since poor Bubba could not let it go, let’s look at THE REST OF THE STORY….
During the recent lockdown, NASCAR was put in a bit of a predicament, as were many businesses. How to keep afloat and keep viewers interested. They decided on a unique way, and very creative I might add.
They went to virtual racing. The eNASCAR iRacing Pro Invitational Series, which essentially features a bunch of NASCAR drivers racing one another in a video game simulation.
However, Bubba had probably the worst day of everyone playing, and showed his true colors when he threw a tantrum.
Reported by CBS Sports on April 5th:
Bubba Wallace loses sponsorship after rage-quitting during NASCAR iRacing event
Wallace quit the race in a huff after an early wreck with Clint Bowyer
Bubba Wallace was one of the 32 drivers competing in the Food City Showdown at a virtual Bristol Motor Speedway on Sunday and he undoubtedly had the worst day of anyone in the field. Not only did Wallace wreck during the 11th lap of the 150-lap race but he was so peeved by it that he wound up “rage-quitting” — a popular gamer term for a player who gets so angry that they prematurely bow out of the competition.
Bubba was not doing so well with the fans or the sponsors after this. How would he regain all that he lost during that fit of temper? How would he make people forget his little conniption?
First, he complained to NASCAR about the Confederate flags being displayed at the racetracks. This gained him the adoration of the Left. NASCAR fell right into the trap and ordered these heritage symbols to be banned.
What they seem to have forgotten is that this is a Southern Sport, with most participants being Southern. And these good ole boys have a sense of pride in their heritage, with includes what some folks call the Confederate flag, but is actually the Battle Flag of the Army of Northern Virginia. The politically correct, yet racially-charged, Left have twisted it to mean something nefarious, and insist that no one is allowed to have any Southern Pride.
So, while he gained the love of the extremists on the Left, he lost the support of the conservative Southern Right.
But someone on his team seemed to have thought about the fact that no one, left or right, likes the idea of lynchings. Talladega provided the perfect opportunity to paint poor Bubba as the victim of a hate crime. (Yes, that should do it. Everyone would love Bubba again.)
That is when the “noose” hit the headlines.
The Conservative Treehouse provided a great article tracing back this hoax.
It will be interesting to see how NASCAR responds; but the clarity of the situation is beyond debate. This “noose in a NASCAR garage” story was false. This was not targeted racial hate toward Bubba Wallace; and it wasn’t even a noose in a NASCAR garage.
The Truth Matters
If it had been determined to be an actual hate crime against poor Bubba, everyone would have been on his side and he would have regained the pedestal that he so desperately craves. However, it was not. And many have said that they thought this whole situation was just so stinky that they could just “Smollett”.
Yes, the truth matters, and now it is coming to light.
The views, opinions, or positions expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, positions of Redoubt News. Social Media, including Facebook, has greatly diminished distribution of our content to our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting Main Stream Media sources. This is called ‘Shadow-banning’. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you. Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here: paypal.me/RedoubtNews


redoubtnews--2020-06-26--Commissioner Sends a Little Message to the Governor

Commissioner Sends a Little Message to the Governor Bonner County Commissioner Steve Bradshaw wrote an open letter to Governor Brad Little today calling him out for his orders on the “ less than catastrophic pandemic , ” suggesting that these Executive Orders were “ orchestrated from someone or somewhere else.
” Governor Little held a press conference today in which he made clear that he has extended the Stage 4 lockdown of the entire state for an additional 2 weeks .
This would take us past the July 4th holiday , traditionally filled with celebrations of Freedom and Independence .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ his orders , regardless of the Covid 19 ( 84 ) numbers the government has assigned to them .
In the letter , Bradshaw reminded Little that his orders not only violate the US Constitution , but they also violate the Idaho State Constitution .
The Commissioner continued with his shredding of the Idaho Governor by quoting General Thomas Gage : ” Thou profane wicked monster of falsehood and perfidy… Your late , infamous proclamation is as full of notorious lies , as toad or rattlesnake of deadly poison – You are an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , you will have an aggravated damnation in hell.
” Telling the Governor that he has abandoned the very people that he took an oath to serve , Commissioner Bradshaw suggested he had caused many to lose everything they had built over their lifetimes .
Additionally , Bradshaw prayed that Little would repent and become the honorable leader the people thought they had elected , or to step aside and pass the torch to a true leader .
An incredibly popular official among his constituents , Steve Bradshaw is not just a Bonner @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pastor of the Cocolalla Cowboy Church , in Cocolalla , Idaho .
Idahoans for the Recall of Governor Brad Little The views , opinions , or positions expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone , and do not necessarily reflect the views , opinions , positions of Redoubt News .
Social Media , including Facebook , has greatly diminished distribution of our content to our readers ’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting Main Stream Media sources .
This is called ‘ Shadow-banning ’ .
Please take a moment and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and family .
Thank you .
Please support our coverage of your rights .
Donate here : paypal.me/RedoubtNews

Commissioner Sends a Little Message to the Governor
by Shari Dovale
Bonner County Commissioner Steve Bradshaw wrote an open letter to Governor Brad Little today calling him out for his orders on the “less than catastrophic pandemic,” suggesting that these Executive Orders were “orchestrated from someone or somewhere else.”
Governor Little held a press conference today in which he made clear that he has extended the Stage 4 lockdown of the entire state for an additional 2 weeks. This would take us past the July 4th holiday, traditionally filled with celebrations of Freedom and Independence.
Little did not remove any county from his orders, regardless of the Covid 19(84) numbers the government has assigned to them.
In the letter, Bradshaw reminded Little that his orders not only violate the US Constitution, but they also violate the Idaho State Constitution.
The Commissioner continued with his shredding of the Idaho Governor by quoting a letter to General Thomas Gage:
”Thou profane wicked monster of falsehood and perfidy… Your late, infamous proclamation is as full of notorious lies, as toad or rattlesnake of deadly poison – You are an abandoned wretch … without a speedy repentance, you will have an aggravated damnation in hell.”
Telling the Governor that he has abandoned the very people that he took an oath to serve, Commissioner Bradshaw suggested he had caused many to lose everything they had built over their lifetimes. Additionally, Bradshaw prayed that Little would repent and become the honorable leader the people thought they had elected, or to step aside and pass the torch to a true leader.
An incredibly popular official among his constituents, Steve Bradshaw is not just a Bonner County Commissioner, but he is the Pastor of the Cocolalla Cowboy Church, in Cocolalla, Idaho.
View Fullscreen
The views, opinions, or positions expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, positions of Redoubt News. Social Media, including Facebook, has greatly diminished distribution of our content to our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting Main Stream Media sources. This is called ‘Shadow-banning’. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you. Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here: paypal.me/RedoubtNews
*edited to reflect the included quote is from a letter TO General Gage.


redoubtnews--2020-06-25--The Political Church: We Will Not Wear Mandated Masks

The Political Church Episode 4 : We Will Not Wear Mandated Masks In Episode 4 , I didn ’ t cover the news I got just this morning .
Gov .
Inslee just had a press conference on mandatory masks and walked out and thanked everyone for showing up in their masks , while he himself had no mask and he said he didn ’ t have his on because of the First Amendment !
!
!
!
Amazing !
Now he ’ s citing his own Constitutional rights and therefore just showed why none of us have to wear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ put a mask on .
This is their buildup to the Mark of the Beast where you can not buy or sell without whatever they demand that you have on your body .
So here it is .
MY LINE in the sand .
I will not .
I refuse .
I refuse to bow down to the evil unlawful act .
If this is where the Mark of the Beast begins to gain traction , count me out .
I flat out refuse .
I will buy all my goods online .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” is the call to God ’ s Christian Church to walk their faith where the battle is being waged right now= politics and American Government !
Now more than ever in American History , the church needs to engage and fight to keep God in America and in our political and governmental institutions , as the goal of our communist enemies is “ To dethrone God and destroy Capitalism ” .
The two greatest Commandments are to Love God and to love your brother as yourself .
This broadcast describes how to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government .
The USA is , afterall , “ One Nation , under God , indivisible , with Liberty and justice for all !
” So please join me as we continue our political and governmental coverage of today ’ s events , with the Christian action perspective , calling each and everyone of you to walk your faith and help to defend God and Jesus Christ in the USA .
Author of “ The Perils of Sustainable Development ” , available for purchase at : Listen to segment 4 of the John @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Liberty at www.radiofreeredoubt.com The views , opinions , or positions expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone , and do not necessarily reflect the views , opinions , positions of Redoubt News .
Social Media , including Facebook , has greatly diminished distribution of our content to our readers ’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting Main Stream Media sources .
This is called ‘ Shadow-banning ’ .
Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family .
Thank you.Please support our coverage of your @ @ @ @ @ @

The Political Church Episode 4:
We Will Not Wear Mandated Masks
In Episode 4, I didn’t cover the news I got just this morning. Gov. Inslee just had a press conference on mandatory masks and walked out and thanked everyone for showing up in their masks, while he himself had no mask and he said he didn’t have his on because of the First Amendment!!!! Amazing! Now he’s citing his own Constitutional rights and therefore just showed why none of us have to wear them either, and I will never put a mask on. This is their buildup to the Mark of the Beast where you cannot buy or sell without whatever they demand that you have on your body. So here it is. MY LINE in the sand. I will not. I refuse. I refuse to bow down to the evil unlawful act. If this is where the Mark of the Beast begins to gain traction, count me out. I flat out refuse. I will buy all my goods online.
“The Political Church with Lady Liberty” is the call to God’s Christian Church to walk their faith where the battle is being waged right now= politics and American Government! Now more than ever in American History, the church needs to engage and fight to keep God in America and in our political and governmental institutions, as the goal of our communist enemies is “To dethrone God and destroy Capitalism”.
The two greatest Commandments are to Love God and to love your brother as yourself. This broadcast describes how to apply those two concepts in politics and government. The USA is, afterall, “One Nation, under God, indivisible, with Liberty and justice for all!”
So please join me as we continue our political and governmental coverage of today’s events, with the Christian action perspective, calling each and everyone of you to walk your faith and help to defend God and Jesus Christ in the USA.
God Bless America!
Lady Liberty
Author of “The Perils of Sustainable Development”, available for purchase at:
www.amrron.com/webstore/?product=book-the-perils-of-sustainable-development
contact: libertystateradio@gmail.com
Listen to segment 4 of the John Jacob Schmidt Show with he and Lady Liberty at www.radiofreeredoubt.com
The views, opinions, or positions expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, positions of Redoubt News. Social Media, including Facebook, has greatly diminished distribution of our content to our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting Main Stream Media sources. This is called ‘Shadow-banning’. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here: Paypal.me/RedoubtNews


redoubtnews--2020-06-25--A Little Rebellion in the Idaho State House

A Little Rebellion in the Idaho State House Members of the Idaho House made history this week when they gathered in Boise and attempted to convene themselves into session to discuss what most citizens feel are unconstitutional and illegal orders given by Governor Brad Little .
They needed 36 members to convene a quorum and gathered not-quite-half that many .
Instead of passing a concurrent resolution putting an end to Governor Little ’ s Covid 19 ( 84 ) orders , they passed a proclamation , read by Rep. Vito Barbieri .
In response to this little rebellion , Governor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an addition 2 weeks of Stage 4 lockdown .
Do you think he was unhappy at these 15 house members ?
That is what is generally believed , therefore , they need to do this again .
They need to call themselves into session and actually take a vote .
They need to get everyone on the record as to who they are supporting !
The brave Representatives that showed up in Boise included : Representatives Judy Boyle , Christi Zito , Ron Mendive , Heather Scott , Tony Wisniewski , Terry Gestrin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Priscilla Giddings , Tim Remington , Chad Christenson , Vito Barbieri , Brent Crane , Mike Kingsley , and Paul Sheppard .
This is a definitive list of which legislators are taking their oaths seriously and representing the people that elected them .
So , who did not attend this historic meeting , and why didn ’ t they ?
Look at the map below .
Just counting the House members , and discounting all Democrats , as we already know their reasons for standing against the Constitution , let ’ s see @ @ @ @ @ @ @ these representatives need to be asked why they could not go and represent their districts .
If they disagreed with the resolution , they would have had their chance to vote against it .
Instead , they ignored the will of the people and showed their true colors as members of the establishment and not in favor of liberty .
Idahoans for the Recall of Governor Brad Little The views , opinions , or positions expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone , and do not necessarily reflect the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ News .
Social Media , including Facebook , has greatly diminished distribution of our content to our readers ’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting Main Stream Media sources .
This is called ‘ Shadow-banning ’ .
Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family .
Thank you .
Please support our coverage of your rights .
Donate here : paypal.me/RedoubtNews

A Little Rebellion in the Idaho State House
by Shari Dovale
Members of the Idaho House made history this week when they gathered in Boise and attempted to convene themselves into session to discuss what most citizens feel are unconstitutional and illegal orders given by Governor Brad Little.
They needed 36 members to convene a quorum and gathered not-quite-half that many. Instead of passing a concurrent resolution putting an end to Governor Little’s Covid 19(84) orders, they passed a proclamation, read by Rep. Vito Barbieri.
View Fullscreen
In response to this little rebellion, Governor Brad Little has put the state on an addition 2 weeks of Stage 4 lockdown. Do you think he was unhappy at these 15 house members?
That is what is generally believed, therefore, they need to do this again. They need to call themselves into session and actually take a vote. They need to get everyone on the record as to who they are supporting!
The brave Representatives that showed up in Boise included: Representatives Judy Boyle, Christi Zito, Ron Mendive, Heather Scott, Tony Wisniewski, Terry Gestrin, Tammy Nichols, Dorothy Moon , Priscilla Giddings, Tim Remington, Chad Christenson, Vito Barbieri, Brent Crane, Mike Kingsley, and Paul Sheppard.
This is a definitive list of which legislators are taking their oaths seriously and representing the people that elected them.
So, who did not attend this historic meeting, and why didn’t they?
Look at the map below. Just counting the House members, and discounting all Democrats, as we already know their reasons for standing against the Constitution, let’s see who did NOT attend.
Sage Dixon Jim Addis Paul Amador Bill Goesling Caroline Nilsson Troy Ryan Kerby Jarom Wagoner Greg Chaney Scott Syme Robert Anderst Rick D. Youngblood Gary E. Collins Mike Moyle Gayann DeMordaunt Joe Palmer James Holtzclaw Steven C. Harris Megan Kiska J ohn Vander Woude Jason Monks Megan Blanksma Lance W. Clow Linda Wright Hartgen Laurie Lickley Clark Kauffman Scott Bedke Fred Wood Randy Armstrong Kevin Andrus Gary L. Marshall Wendy Horman Neil A. Anderson Julianne Young Marc Gibbs Barbara Ehardt Doug Ricks Britt Raybould J erald Raymond Rod Furniss Bryan Zollinger
Each of these representatives need to be asked why they could not go and represent their districts. If they disagreed with the resolution, they would have had their chance to vote against it. Instead, they ignored the will of the people and showed their true colors as members of the establishment and not in favor of liberty.
The views, opinions, or positions expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, positions of Redoubt News. Social Media, including Facebook, has greatly diminished distribution of our content to our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting Main Stream Media sources. This is called ‘Shadow-banning’. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you. Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here: paypal.me/RedoubtNews


redoubtnews--2020-06-30--Rebuttal Letter to Frank Vandersloot

Rebuttal Letter to Frank Vandersloot

Throughout history there have always been people that claim to be something they are not .
Some do it and knew it , and others have no idea and your letter is no exception to my statement .
What should be stated early is that I do not altogether disagree with you and neither do each of the movements in question .
The Devil is in the details and I hope I can explain .
It is true what you call and what is commonly known as conservative principles have always outperformed liberal solutions and this is exactly why most @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you begin to go sideways is where you mention a “ new version ” of conservatism .
You see , the “ new version ” really isn ’ t new and the fingers you point may be the one ’ s if you see it clearly the one ’ s pointing back at you when my letter to you is done .
The “ new version ” you refer to isn ’ t a “ radical group of so called freedom lovers , ” the radical group was the group that infiltrated the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that define themselves as Neoconservatives or “ Trotskyite –style Marxists .
This is what we “ freedom lovers ’ see and what we know about the republican establishment and if you knew anything about the Neocons , you would know this to be true because they believe and support all that you do .
The sad part is that in your attempt to define what true conservatism is , you seem to not know that there are different types of conservatives and that most of us don ’ t call ourselves conservatives at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like the members in the party that can ’ t even adhere to the platform and detest those that try to hold them accountable to the very thing that defines them .
This in itself is quite ironic don ’ t you think and quite telling of whom the true subversives really are ?
At least we are open about who we are and what we want , when you neocons parade around like you are all playing parts in George Orwell ’ s 1984 in support of party over liberty and therein @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over party and I think the republican ’ s hate it and now that they see us as a threat , they need to further divide our already divided country which seems most aligned with the communist revolutionaries than attempting to keep the peace by opening up dialogue .
As for Radical , “ Common Sense ” and your word “ conservative , ” if I asked you probably couldn ’ t define for the party or probably for yourself what either terms mean .
So , Frank , how do you define @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
What exactly is it that rubs you so wrongly about us ?
Do you even know ?
“ Common Sense ” is that your word for “ moderate ?
” that we need to compromise ?
If you have any faith , you would know that isn ’ t even possible and still remain in God ’ s favor .
Now you propose to take for yourself the ability to define terms for yourself and tell the rest of us what you think they should be without being challenged ?
Not in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what you seem to hate ironically are the ideals of true Biblical Constitutionalism .
Because if you didn ’ t , we would have any issues , would we ?
You seem to hate being held accountable for deviation from the party platform but don ’ t even recognize the issues of why the country has gone awry as elected officials have deviated from the Constitution and you somehow blame us for you your inconsistencies or the fact that you in your professional stature can ’ t even take a stance for fear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fits your safe-space requirements ?
As for party reputation , this clearly shows where your priorities lie in that you do support party over liberty and justice for all because you believe that party control is the answer to all of the world ’ s problems .
The problem with this is that is shows such a narrow periphery of just how much you don ’ t know about how much trouble this country and state are in that the ID GOP being so clueless will never fix or perhaps it desires not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ problem ?
Have you not realized the support for the party has dwindled indeed because of the reputation but not because of us but because people are starting to see that it ’ s all about party control and not trying to fix all that which is broken .
In case you do not understand or in case you prefer not to or in case you are part of the problem and I need to clarify , this nations and this globes problems aren ’ t because of people like us , it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ freaks that desire to control every nation and every man woman and child across the world and the republicans refusal to recognize the threat .
Those that still say these things are a matter of conspiracy theory have just admitted that they are a part of the problem by discrediting what is now plainly in the face of anyone remotely paying any attention .
It matters not that you believe me because truth exists either way .
The question is do you care more about our country and future generations than you do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ politics that actually has done more to expand socialist programs than we ever would and you call us subversives .
You mention this group being secretly funded so you are either a liar or you would have no issue proving with evidence where the money comes from ?
I find it totally ironic that such a man would call the kettle black when he , himself gives money to leftist organizations they say they are trying to beat by maintaining control…unless of course you have more in common with leftist groups than you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have no problem giving them money while espousing such vitriol for us ?
You wouldn ’ t be a hypocrite now would you be , Frank ?
So , what exactly is Otterpac and what is the money actually used for ?
I believe I read or was told that it was to maintain control of the state by undermining the value of the individual vote in favor of the collective ?
Isn ’ t collectivism closer to the real enemy and contrary to your stated principles in your letter ?
Did you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” to determine if people are really conservatives ?
You really are appealing to the ignorant aren ’ t you when you fail to even consider a party platform defines a party much like borders do to nation .
Borders are not random and arbitrary , they are clearly defined .
Can you not see how it would be possible to have your own party infiltrated and not know it if no one had to adhered to anything ?
Can you imagine running a nation of laws that way ?
I think you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ free fall now because people are running our nation just the way you believe “ common sense republicans ” should be and you still think we are the problem ?
You can ’ t be serious .
Would you be a billionaire if you ran your companies that way ?
I think not !
You and I do agree however on the mislabeling of republicans .
I have never been a fan of the term RINO either .
The proper term is NEOCON .
Although I will also agree that many of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , I know and love many of them .
I also know that many people because they are unaware and just want to be involved unknowingly aid in national subversion aren ’ t even aware they are doing it and there are of course…others that do .
The problem is , separating the two and not creating new enemies that may not be enemies at all but that is the globalist plan isn ’ t it , to break down society and to get people to fight against each other on every triviality @ @ @ @ @ @ @ You do believe in what is true , don ’ t you Frank ?
The vilification of good people is not a good thing but when it is merely pointing out what I am to you , I see it as sharing a perspective using truth to do it and if one sees it as vilification , I am not sure I can do much to change that without the ability , willingness and desire for both parties to communicate and in my perspective we take far more heat from the republicans than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just from my perspective .
I myself have always wanted to find those that disagree and to chat and find solutions or at least be willing to know more about someone else than just assume .
Are you willing to do so Frank ?
Where you and I do again agree Frank is true that we also believe in personal responsibility , individual freedoms , limited government , family values , honesty , integrity , the rule of law , and finding common sense solutions .
We also value common sense .
We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disagree is that you say true conservatives listen to the other side even when they do not agree with the other side but they don ’ t practice what they preach !
If they did , they would be calling each other on the phone e or setting up meetings , not lambasting an entire class of people without doing so .
It is again true that “ true conservatives ” can think for themselves rather than being told what to believe and how to vote and true conservatives find common sense solutions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ day but why would you say that we adhere to nonsensical dogma , then say again that these thoughts were created by a handful of persons who are controlled by their own special interests ?
Do you like lawsuits for libel and slander or is that not a problem for you because you have enough money to outspend anyone in our movement ?
By the way , just because this may be true does not mean you are right , it just means you may like to control others as well as the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The party seems to think we desire to take over the Republican Party and we want to overthrow the government and God knows what other nonsensical garbage .
In reality if you must know what the desires are , all you would need to do is adhere to your own principles you listed above and ask .
Constitutionalists have no desire to take over the party , or overthrow the government , what we desire is to help people understand why returning to our Founder ’ s Originality Principles would solve many of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gain enough to support to realize that our Constitution is hanging by a thread and for each of us to hold each other accountable as to why this is happening and how our actions that we may be unaware of could be a part of the problem and not part of the solution .
I see that this could go both ways if both are willing .
The party is the last of our goals until it decides to go on the offensive and attack those they have no desire to communicate with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ourselves we are labeled Extreme ?
You conveniently say that we deem anyone who disagrees with them as “ the enemy ” but you don ’ t even see you are the one clearly doing so in your open letter to the world assaulting our character as an offensive move not a defensive one .
How hypocritical .
You say we use the liberal tactic of destroying the messenger rather than providing a reasonable argument to the message but in reality you use the tactic to avoid any communication with us just as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I not providing a reasonable argument and how would you define reasonable anyway , like you do conservative and common sense ?
You call us “ radical conservatives ” and tell us we are not conservatives , We ’ ll let me ask you something , if you don ’ t adhere to your own platform and anyone is invited , why suddenly are we not welcome ?
Maybe we don ’ t call ourselves conservatives ( I know many that still do however ) so if I had to ask Frank , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one adheres to any set of rules or their platform ?
Have you not noticed that this state , for example , has slid radically left with “ conservative ’ republicans in control ?
How do explain that ?
Is that our fault too ?
Your CINO designation is cute .
Are you hoping you can create your own language with your own terms ?
You seem to be off to a great start !
As far as being secretly funded and making back room deals to secure power , I sure hope @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I mean , you wouldn ’ t make such accusations without them would you Frank ?
Perhaps you could enlighten us all by sharing those for the world to see that you are right and we…well…are not ?
Our mission , although I can only speak for myself , is not to take over your party because most of us hate the party system .
We hate that system because it was contrary to what the founders wanted and believed it did more to eradicate the integrity of an individual vote in favor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In saying so , it doesn ’ t mean we desire to implode the party either , it means that for decades we have wanted the opportunity to communicate with others that hate us and to know why and to be challenged on why what we believe is wrong but when we are constantly attacked by letters like yours and speakers like Sheriff Ozzie coming here labeling us the enemy , these are not the principles for which you say you support , They are offensive attacks and divisive , not defensive .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ fight no matter who my opponent is but I will always try to communicate with them first before publicly assaulting them unless all attempts to communicate have failed or , like you are unreachable and of course if I am met with offensive attacks .
Many , not all , are Biblical Constitutionalists and many are far more educated in these principles that you would ever know .
We understand current events we understand history , we understand that history repeats itself for those that don ’ t know it .
We have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Scriptures and we understand far more about the conspiratorial elements undermining American liberty than anyone , so if you find what we believe that hard to swallow , you really need to reassess your worldview and if you still decide to adhere to your arbitrary tenants , It is best publicly know I am not to be called a “ conservative ” at all and I openly admit it .
This nation is in trouble .
You as a man or tremendous influence can make a huge difference in this state and you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on but as Sun Tsu said , you better know yourself and your enemy or you may be imperiled in every battle .
Are you sure you want to choose us as your adversary ?
Sincerely and as respectfully written as possible , Tom Munds A regular guy that gives a crap about our country and our state and future generations The views , opinions , or positions expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone , and do not necessarily reflect the views , opinions , positions of Redoubt @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , has greatly diminished distribution of our content to our readers ’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting Main Stream Media sources .
This is called ‘ Shadow-banning ’ .
Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family .
Thank you.Please support our coverage of your rights .
Donate here : Paypal.me/RedoubtNews

Dear Frank,
Throughout history there have always been people that claim to be something they are not. Some do it and knew it, and others have no idea and your letter is no exception to my statement. What should be stated early is that I do not altogether disagree with you and neither do each of the movements in question. The Devil is in the details and I hope I can explain.
It is true what you call and what is commonly known as conservative principles have always outperformed liberal solutions and this is exactly why most of us support conservative solutions but where you begin to go sideways is where you mention a “new version” of conservatism. You see, the “new version” really isn’t new and the fingers you point may be the one’s if you see it clearly the one’s pointing back at you when my letter to you is done.
The “new version” you refer to isn’t a “radical group of so called freedom lovers,” the radical group was the group that infiltrated the republican party decades ago by the Neoconservatives that define themselves as Neoconservatives or “Trotskyite –style Marxists. This is what we “freedom lovers’ see and what we know about the republican establishment and if you knew anything about the Neocons, you would know this to be true because they believe and support all that you do. The sad part is that in your attempt to define what true conservatism is, you seem to not know that there are different types of conservatives and that most of us don’t call ourselves conservatives at all because the term is completely ambiguous like the members in the party that can’t even adhere to the platform and detest those that try to hold them accountable to the very thing that defines them. This in itself is quite ironic don’t you think and quite telling of whom the true subversives really are?
At least we are open about who we are and what we want, when you neocons parade around like you are all playing parts in George Orwell’s 1984 in support of party over liberty and therein is the difference. We support liberty over party and I think the republican’s hate it and now that they see us as a threat, they need to further divide our already divided country which seems most aligned with the communist revolutionaries than attempting to keep the peace by opening up dialogue. As for Radical, “Common Sense” and your word “conservative,” if I asked you probably couldn’t define for the party or probably for yourself what either terms mean.
So, Frank, how do you define conservatism? Is that party over constitution? What exactly is it that rubs you so wrongly about us? Do you even know? “Common Sense” is that your word for “moderate?” that we need to compromise? If you have any faith, you would know that isn’t even possible and still remain in God’s favor. Now you propose to take for yourself the ability to define terms for yourself and tell the rest of us what you think they should be without being challenged? Not in my house.
To be clear, what you seem to hate ironically are the ideals of true Biblical Constitutionalism. Because if you didn’t, we would have any issues, would we? You seem to hate being held accountable for deviation from the party platform but don’t even recognize the issues of why the country has gone awry as elected officials have deviated from the Constitution and you somehow blame us for you your inconsistencies or the fact that you in your professional stature can’t even take a stance for fear of political backlash unless of course it fits your safe-space requirements?
As for party reputation, this clearly shows where your priorities lie in that you do support party over liberty and justice for all because you believe that party control is the answer to all of the world’s problems. The problem with this is that is shows such a narrow periphery of just how much you don’t know about how much trouble this country and state are in that the ID GOP being so clueless will never fix or perhaps it desires not to because it is part of the problem? Have you not realized the support for the party has dwindled indeed because of the reputation but not because of us but because people are starting to see that it’s all about party control and not trying to fix all that which is broken.
In case you do not understand or in case you prefer not to or in case you are part of the problem and I need to clarify, this nations and this globes problems aren’t because of people like us, it is because of a group of control freaks that desire to control every nation and every man woman and child across the world and the republicans refusal to recognize the threat. Those that still say these things are a matter of conspiracy theory have just admitted that they are a part of the problem by discrediting what is now plainly in the face of anyone remotely paying any attention. It matters not that you believe me because truth exists either way. The question is do you care more about our country and future generations than you do about being the controlling entity in Idaho politics that actually has done more to expand socialist programs than we ever would and you call us subversives.
You mention this group being secretly funded so you are either a liar or you would have no issue proving with evidence where the money comes from? I find it totally ironic that such a man would call the kettle black when he, himself gives money to leftist organizations they say they are trying to beat by maintaining control…unless of course you have more in common with leftist groups than you do with us which is why you have no problem giving them money while espousing such vitriol for us? You wouldn’t be a hypocrite now would you be, Frank? So, what exactly is Otterpac and what is the money actually used for? I believe I read or was told that it was to maintain control of the state by undermining the value of the individual vote in favor of the collective? Isn’t collectivism closer to the real enemy and contrary to your stated principles in your letter?
Did you just accuse us of “Cult-like litmus” to determine if people are really conservatives? You really are appealing to the ignorant aren’t you when you fail to even consider a party platform defines a party much like borders do to nation. Borders are not random and arbitrary, they are clearly defined. Can you not see how it would be possible to have your own party infiltrated and not know it if no one had to adhered to anything? Can you imagine running a nation of laws that way? I think you would agree that our nation is in free fall now because people are running our nation just the way you believe “common sense republicans” should be and you still think we are the problem? You can’t be serious. Would you be a billionaire if you ran your companies that way? I think not!
You and I do agree however on the mislabeling of republicans. I have never been a fan of the term RINO either. The proper term is NEOCON. Although I will also agree that many of the people in the party are good people, I know and love many of them. I also know that many people because they are unaware and just want to be involved unknowingly aid in national subversion aren’t even aware they are doing it and there are of course…others that do. The problem is, separating the two and not creating new enemies that may not be enemies at all but that is the globalist plan isn’t it, to break down society and to get people to fight against each other on every triviality without even questioning what is true. You do believe in what is true, don’t you Frank?
The vilification of good people is not a good thing but when it is merely pointing out what I am to you, I see it as sharing a perspective using truth to do it and if one sees it as vilification, I am not sure I can do much to change that without the ability, willingness and desire for both parties to communicate and in my perspective we take far more heat from the republicans than we give but again, that is just from my perspective. I myself have always wanted to find those that disagree and to chat and find solutions or at least be willing to know more about someone else than just assume. Are you willing to do so Frank?
Where you and I do again agree Frank is true that we also believe in personal responsibility, individual freedoms, limited government, family values, honesty, integrity, the rule of law, and finding common sense solutions. We also value common sense. We have have compassion but again where we disagree is that you say true conservatives listen to the other side even when they do not agree with the other side but they don’t practice what they preach! If they did, they would be calling each other on the phone e or setting up meetings, not lambasting an entire class of people without doing so. It is again true that “true conservatives” can think for themselves rather than being told what to believe and how to vote and true conservatives find common sense solutions to new problems that face us every day but why would you say that we adhere to nonsensical dogma, then say again that these thoughts were created by a handful of persons who are controlled by their own special interests? Do you like lawsuits for libel and slander or is that not a problem for you because you have enough money to outspend anyone in our movement? By the way, just because this may be true does not mean you are right, it just means you may like to control others as well as the outcomes maintaining control at all times.
The party seems to think we desire to take over the Republican Party and we want to overthrow the government and God knows what other nonsensical garbage. In reality if you must know what the desires are, all you would need to do is adhere to your own principles you listed above and ask.
Constitutionalists have no desire to take over the party, or overthrow the government, what we desire is to help people understand why returning to our Founder’s Originality Principles would solve many of the problems we face today and hopefully gain enough to support to realize that our Constitution is hanging by a thread and for each of us to hold each other accountable as to why this is happening and how our actions that we may be unaware of could be a part of the problem and not part of the solution. I see that this could go both ways if both are willing. The party is the last of our goals until it decides to go on the offensive and attack those they have no desire to communicate with us and then when we outwardly defend ourselves we are labeled Extreme?
You conveniently say that we deem anyone who disagrees with them as “the enemy” but you don’t even see you are the one clearly doing so in your open letter to the world assaulting our character as an offensive move not a defensive one. How hypocritical. You say we use the liberal tactic of destroying the messenger rather than providing a reasonable argument to the message but in reality you use the tactic to avoid any communication with us just as the left does to us. Am I not providing a reasonable argument and how would you define reasonable anyway, like you do conservative and common sense?
You call us “radical conservatives” and tell us we are not conservatives, We’ll let me ask you something, if you don’t adhere to your own platform and anyone is invited, why suddenly are we not welcome? Maybe we don’t call ourselves conservatives (I know many that still do however) so if I had to ask Frank, what exactly are you conserving when no one adheres to any set of rules or their platform? Have you not noticed that this state, for example, has slid radically left with “conservative’ republicans in control? How do explain that? Is that our fault too? Your CINO designation is cute. Are you hoping you can create your own language with your own terms? You seem to be off to a great start!
As far as being secretly funded and making back room deals to secure power, I sure hope you have evidence of your claims, I mean, you wouldn’t make such accusations without them would you Frank? Perhaps you could enlighten us all by sharing those for the world to see that you are right and we…well…are not?
Our mission, although I can only speak for myself, is not to take over your party because most of us hate the party system. We hate that system because it was contrary to what the founders wanted and believed it did more to eradicate the integrity of an individual vote in favor of the collective that support it. In saying so, it doesn’t mean we desire to implode the party either, it means that for decades we have wanted the opportunity to communicate with others that hate us and to know why and to be challenged on why what we believe is wrong but when we are constantly attacked by letters like yours and speakers like Sheriff Ozzie coming here labeling us the enemy, these are not the principles for which you say you support, They are offensive attacks and divisive, not defensive.
I will never back down from a fight no matter who my opponent is but I will always try to communicate with them first before publicly assaulting them unless all attempts to communicate have failed or, like you are unreachable and of course if I am met with offensive attacks.
Many, not all, are Biblical Constitutionalists and many are far more educated in these principles that you would ever know. We understand current events we understand history, we understand that history repeats itself for those that don’t know it. We have reverence for the God and The Holy Scriptures and we understand far more about the conspiratorial elements undermining American liberty than anyone, so if you find what we believe that hard to swallow, you really need to reassess your worldview and if you still decide to adhere to your arbitrary tenants, It is best publicly know I am not to be called a “conservative” at all and I openly admit it.
This nation is in trouble. You as a man or tremendous influence can make a huge difference in this state and you get to choose which side you are on but as Sun Tsu said, you better know yourself and your enemy or you may be imperiled in every battle. Are you sure you want to choose us as your adversary?
Sincerely and as respectfully written as possible,
Tom Munds
A regular guy that gives a crap about our country and our state and future generations
The views, opinions, or positions expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, positions of Redoubt News. Social Media, including Facebook, has greatly diminished distribution of our content to our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting Main Stream Media sources. This is called ‘Shadow-banning’. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here: Paypal.me/RedoubtNews


redoubtnews--2020-06-30--Oregon Locks Out Citizens During “Special Session”

The first “ special session ” of 2020 closed on June 26th .
The people of Oregon were locked out of the session and the Capitol Building .
While the Democrats gave lip service to the notion that the public could still testify , anyone who watched the “ remote ” hearings could see that actually connecting was a clown show with constant missed or dropped calls and a system totally incapable of keeping people involved .
While numerous bills restricting police passed , the continuing chaos in our streets was ignored .
Five of the police accountability bills begin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Matter.
” By capitalizing “ Black Lives Matter ” they enshrined the leftist , anti-police , political organization and not the concept that people of one particular race matter .
Nowhere mentioned in any of the bills was the fact that people of all races suffer when those in authority abuse their power .
While we see nightly violence in many parts of our state and , in fact , across the country , the Democrats in control continue to condone and approve these actions , refusing to condemn the organized destruction .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ restrictive measures against the law abiding and curtailing their freedom and rights , she and other Democrat leaders are insisting that the mobs of looters and rioters are somehow immune to the spread of the disease she uses as a justification for closing churches .
The nightly riots in Portland barely register as “ news ” showing up in the “ Oregonian ” well below sports stories .
There is no doubt that these actions are coordinated and well funded .
No one should underestimate how violent those involved are prepared to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people , including police , being attacked by armed mobs and whole parts of American cities are now under the control of violent criminals .
All with the blessing of elected Democrats .
Small town mayors are being attacked for standing up to the mobs .
All of this was predicated in 2017 .
So what does all this mean for you ?
While Oregon has always done a very bad job of processing the background checks required before you can exercise a God given Constitutional “ right ” , things have now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ OFF hears from people who are waiting days for the State Police simply to start their background checks for gun purchases .
Then they have to wait through the process of the check which could delay them for months .
While both Oregon and Federal law allow a buyer to take possession of a firearm if they have not been approved after 3 business days , ( barring an outright denial ) this rule only applies to people who have been delayed after a check has been initiated .
There is no protection @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have the process begin .
And even then , very few dealers are willing to transfer a firearm on a “ delay ” because of the years of threats and lies they have received from the ATF and the State Police .
People who are justifiably fearful of the daily violence , and the inability of police to intervene , are facing long and dangerous delays acquiring self defense firearms even if they can find something to buy .
The State Police Firearms Instant Check unit is grossly understaffed as a result of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we experience the biggest surge in attempted firearms purchases ever .
Furthermore , Kate Brown ’ s animosity towards gun owners all but guarantees that there will be no effort on the part of the State Police FICS unit to correct the mess they have created .
Add to this the fact that many sheriff ’ s offices are refusing to issue new concealed handgun licenses and it is becoming the perfect storm for mindless anarchy .
Many people in the worst locations are on their own and defenseless .
There is currently @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is going improve soon .
The Governor has promised more “ special sessions.
” Anything can happen in those sessions .
The Democrats in control demonstrated in this most recent session that Republican bills and input are not welcome .
The minority party may as well not even show up .
While Oregon faces an economic crisis created by state mandate , the legislature is in no way compelled to address that .
They have the ability to institute any new law they want to and could certainly use the current chaos to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ same time our police are being ordered to stand down and having their budgets cut .
Now would be a good time to assess your current needs and situation and consider making whatever preparations you can as the lawlessness moves out of the larger cities .
Oregon ’ s ruling party has shown no interest in restoring order and in fact demonstrated a strong affinity for the rioters .
Please be cautious and we ’ ll keep you informed of any legislative action the may effect you even while you as voters are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Firearms Federation is a no-compromise voice for gun owners .
Founded in 1998 , they began their work in the 1999 legislative session .
The views , opinions , or positions expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone , and do not necessarily reflect the views , opinions , positions of Redoubt News .
Social Media , including Facebook , has greatly diminished distribution of our content to our readers ’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting Main Stream Media sources .
This is called ‘ Shadow-banning ’ .
Please @ @ @ @ @ @ @ article with your friends and family .
Thank you .
Please support our coverage of your rights .
Donate here : paypal.me/RedoubtNews

Oregon Locks Out Citizens During “Special Session”
by Oregon Firearms Federation
The first “special session” of 2020 closed on June 26th.
The people of Oregon were locked out of the session and the Capitol Building. While the Democrats gave lip service to the notion that the public could still testify, anyone who watched the “remote” hearings could see that actually connecting was a clown show with constant missed or dropped calls and a system totally incapable of keeping people involved.
While numerous bills restricting police passed, the continuing chaos in our streets was ignored.
Five of the police accountability bills begin with the introductory clause “Black Lives Matter.”
By capitalizing “Black Lives Matter” they enshrined the leftist, anti-police, political organization and not the concept that people of one particular race matter.
Nowhere mentioned in any of the bills was the fact that people of all races suffer when those in authority abuse their power.
While we see nightly violence in many parts of our state and, in fact, across the country, the Democrats in control continue to condone and approve these actions, refusing to condemn the organized destruction.
Even while the governor is instituting more restrictive measures against the law abiding and curtailing their freedom and rights, she and other Democrat leaders are insisting that the mobs of looters and rioters are somehow immune to the spread of the disease she uses as a justification for closing churches. The nightly riots in Portland barely register as “news” showing up in the “Oregonian” well below sports stories.
There is no doubt that these actions are coordinated and well funded.
No one should underestimate how violent those involved are prepared to be.
Videos from around the country show people, including police, being attacked by armed mobs and whole parts of American cities are now under the control of violent criminals. All with the blessing of elected Democrats.
Small town mayors are being attacked for standing up to the mobs.
All of this was predicated in 2017.
So what does all this mean for you?
While Oregon has always done a very bad job of processing the background checks required before you can exercise a God given Constitutional “right”, things have now reached a crisis stage.
Every day OFF hears from people who are waiting days for the State Police simply to start their background checks for gun purchases . Then they have to wait through the process of the check which could delay them for months.
While both Oregon and Federal law allow a buyer to take possession of a firearm if they have not been approved after 3 business days, (barring an outright denial ) this rule only applies to people who have been delayed after a check has been initiated. There is no protection for people who are waiting just to have the process begin. And even then, very few dealers are willing to transfer a firearm on a “delay” because of the years of threats and lies they have received from the ATF and the State Police.
People who are justifiably fearful of the daily violence, and the inability of police to intervene, are facing long and dangerous delays acquiring self defense firearms even if they can find something to buy.
The State Police Firearms Instant Check unit is grossly understaffed as a result of Kate Brown’s stay-at-home dictates while we experience the biggest surge in attempted firearms purchases ever. Furthermore, Kate Brown’s animosity towards gun owners all but guarantees that there will be no effort on the part of the State Police FICS unit to correct the mess they have created.
Add to this the fact that many sheriff’s offices are refusing to issue new concealed handgun licenses and it is becoming the perfect storm for mindless anarchy.
Many people in the worst locations are on their own and defenseless.
There is currently no reason to believe any of this is going improve soon. The Governor has promised more “special sessions.” Anything can happen in those sessions. The Democrats in control demonstrated in this most recent session that Republican bills and input are not welcome. The minority party may as well not even show up.
While Oregon faces an economic crisis created by state mandate, the legislature is in no way compelled to address that. They have the ability to institute any new law they want to and could certainly use the current chaos to ram through new firearms restrictions at the same time our police are being ordered to stand down and having their budgets cut.
Now would be a good time to assess your current needs and situation and consider making whatever preparations you can as the lawlessness moves out of the larger cities. Oregon’s ruling party has shown no interest in restoring order and in fact demonstrated a strong affinity for the rioters.
Please be cautious and we’ll keep you informed of any legislative action the may effect you even while you as voters are locked out of the process.
Oregon Firearms Federation is a no-compromise voice for gun owners. Founded in 1998, they began their work in the 1999 legislative session.
The views, opinions, or positions expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, positions of Redoubt News. Social Media, including Facebook, has greatly diminished distribution of our content to our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting Main Stream Media sources. This is called ‘Shadow-banning’. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you. Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here: paypal.me/RedoubtNews