stillnessinthestorm--2020-10-13--The Parthenon and the Golden Ratio: Myth or Misinformation?

( Gary Meisner ) The application of the golden ratio by the designers of the Parthenon is a common point of confusion and dissension .
Multiple seemingly credible sources state that the golden ratio was not used in the design of the Parthenon .
Most of these , however , trace back to a single very inaccurate and incomplete article as their source .
Once this information was published by a few recognized authorities , more people yet then quoted them as a “ reputable ” source , and the misinformation grew .
Related Golden Saffron , Saffron Extract 8825 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Appetite Suppressant That Works – 88.5 mg per Capsule – Manufactured by Highest Quality Saffron , Non-GMO , 30 Day Supply No disrespect is intended for those who have unknowingly created or passed along inaccurate or incomplete information .
The objective here is to investigate the sources , examine the evidence , present the facts , and allow readers to have all information needed to come to their own evidence-based conclusions .
What the expert sources say As of this writing in August 2020 , Wikipedia ’ s article on the Parthenon says @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Golden Ratio says this : Let ’ s look more closely at the references presented in the Wikipedia articles to understand the basis for their claims that the golden ratio ’ s appearance is unsupported and now discredited .
Reference 66 is to the 1992 article “ Misconceptions about the Golden Ratio ” by Dr. George Markowsky .
I reviewed this article in 2016 , and found that Dr. Markowksy had performed only a single relevant calculation of the Parthenon ’ s width to height .
He referenced seven sources who claimed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ratio .
He presented Figure 6 alone below to illustrate the claimed fit .
Among his references are similar illustrations by David Bergamini in “ Mathematics ” and Theoni Pappas in “ The Joy of Mathematics.
” From the various sources , Dr. Markowsky calculated the ratio of the width of 101′ 3.75″ from Tractenberg and Hyman to the “ height of the apex above the stylobate ” of 59 feet from Rossiter .
This yields a ratio of 1.717 , which is not the golden ratio of 1.618…+ .
He references a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ World Atlas of Architecture “ : I found the “ World Atlas of Architecture ” to be a wonderful resource on the history and style of architecture , but there is not one building in its 408 pages which references the mathematics of a building ’ s design .
This is true even on its coverage of the UN Secretariat Building , whose architect , Le Corbusier publicly advanced his golden-ratio based system of design , called ” Le Modulor ” .
So as good as this book is , it ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to punt rather than to tackle the topic .
With Flon ’ s opinion on the “ uncertain validity ” and “ speculation ” in support of his finding though , Markowsky summarily dismissed the golden ratio of the Parthenon without any investigation into any of its other elements of design , and moved to the next topic in his article , which I review separately here .
In doing so , Markowsky notably omits the words of Flon that follow : Also of interest is that while Flon says that we should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ it is not unlikely that some architects , in imitation of sculptors such as Polycleitos , should have wished to base their works on a strict system of ratios.
“ Polykleitos wrote a treatise around 450 BC called “ The Canon , ” which comes from the Greek word kanon , meaning measure , rule , or law .
It is a theoretical work that discusses ideal mathematical proportions for the parts of the human body , and aesthetic theories of the mathematical bases of artistic perfection .
Though the text is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as saying , According to the Getty Museum , references to “ The Canon ” in other ancient books : Symmetria means ‘ common measure ’ .
The Greeks interpreted this word , as the harmony of the different parts of an object , the good proportions between its constituent parts .
This is exactly what the closer examination of the Parthenon ( below ) reveals .
Rhythmos refers to the proportions and patterns as an exploration of the nature of motion .
Polykleitas worked alongside other Athenian sculptors , including Phidias , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ others for the Parthenon .
Work on the Parthenon began in 447 BC , so the impact of Polykleitos ’ treatise on artistic perfection could very well have had a very timely and direct impact on the design on Parthenon , and not be subject to the “ generalization ” Flon made in reference to all Greek architecture .
Reference 67 that follows on Wikipedia is to pages 74-75 of Dr. Mario Livio ’ s 2003 book , “ The Golden Ratio : The Story of PHI , the World ’ s Most @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by Adolph Zeising ( “ The Golden Section ” ) and Matila Ghyka ( “ The Golden Number “ ) that claim this golden rectangle , and yet another golden ratio , but he then turns to Dr. Markowsky ’ s article .
Dr. Livio includes yet another single , simple illustration of the Parthenon bordered by a golden rectangle .
He refers to the same width to height measurements and ratio as Markowsky .
He too quotes Christine Flon , and thus concludes “ this is far less certain than many books @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not particularly well supported by the actual dimensions of the Parthenon.
” Again , none of the many other design elements of the Parthenon are illustrated or addressed .
Reference number 112 in the Wikipedia article on the Golden Ratio appears in the caption of the the photo of the Parthenon , but we find that the reference simply says “ Livio 2003 , pp .
74–75 , ” duplicating the reference 67 that has already been given .
Reference number 114 in the Wikipedia article on the Parthenon is from page 54 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , “ The Math Instinct.
” In the copy I purchased , the reference to the Parthenon appears on page 108 .
There the text simply states anecdotally , “ Certainly , the oft repeated assertion that the Parthenon in Athens is based on the golden ratio is not supported by actual measurements .
In fact , the entire story about the Greeks and the golden ratio seems to be without foundation.
” Dr. Devlin presents no discussion at all of any evidence .
No illustrations of the Parthenon are presented .
No @ @ @ @ @ @ @ support this statement .
I did a Google search to find that Dr. Devlin revealed his source in two of his articles on the Mathematics Association of America site : • “ Good stories , pity they ’ re not true , ” June 2004 , where referring to the Parthenon , architects in general , Leonardo da Vinci and painters in general , he states , “ there ’ s not a shred of evidence to support any of these claims , and good reason to believe they are completely false , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pointed out in his article “ Misconceptions About the Golden Ratio ” , published in the College Mathematics Journal in January 1992.
” • “ The Myth That Will Not Go Away , ” May 2007 , where he states , “ Then I read an excellent article by the University of Maine mathematician George Markowsky , titled “ Misconceptions about the golden ratio ” , published in the College Mathematics Journal in January 1992 .
In his article , Markowsky subjected many of the common claims about the golden ratio to a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ quite a few of them come up decidedly short .
Further evidence against many of the common claims you see made about the golden ratio were provided by writer Mario Livio in his 2002 book “ The Golden Ratio : The Story of PHI , the World ’ s Most Astonishing Number.
” So it turns out that Devlin ’ s “ two ” sources were Markowsky and Livio , and Livio ’ s source was Markowsky .
Unfortunately , as of this writing many other sources are now quoting this “ evidence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Devlin and Livio as credible and established .
Devlin is a noted author on mathematics and NPR ’ s “ The Math Guy.
” Livio is also an accomplished author on mathematics and science , and widely recognized astrophysicist .
These gentlemen are highly intelligent , and accomplished and recognized in their fields .
Their words have broad impact , even if in this particular situation their positions were lacking in evidence and analysis .
In the end , none of these very recognized sources who stated that the golden ratios are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to go beyond a very simplistic and superficial calculation of the Parthenon ’ s width to height , and even this was done inaccurately .
This lack of evidence and analysis presented to support their statements is indeed unfortunate .
Before we examine what the evidence actually shows for golden ratios in the design of the Parthenon , we should understand this : If the golden ratio DOES exist , why did Dr. Markowsky not find it ?
The answer is surprisingly simple .
Note that Markowsky ’ s height measurement of 59 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the apex above the stylobate.
” This means that he measured from the base of the columns .
Note too that in ALL of the Parthenon illustrations presented , including Markowsky ’ s , that the golden rectangle is NOT based on the base of the columns “ above the stylobyte.
” Rather , the base of the golden rectangle INCLUDES the steps of the stylobyte that lead up to the Parthenon.
” Let ’ s determine what his results would have been if his measurements had been consistent with the supporting illustrations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( 2002 ) , the height of the first two steps descending from the stylobyte are 1.811 feet and 1.680 feet , respectively .
If we add that to the height included in the Parthenon ’ s height , we get 62.491 feet instead of 59 feet .
The ratio of the width of 101′ 3.75″ to revised height of 62.491′ is 1.621 , a variance of only 0.20 % from the golden ratio of 1.618 ( to four digits ) !
This is well within the tolerance that Dr. Markowsky established for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It makes perfect sense too that any measure of the Parthenon ’ s height to width should include its stylobye/base , for this is critical to what the observers sees as “ The Parthenon.
” If asked to draw the Parthenon , anyone with good observational skills would draw the structure with its base foundation , not just columns on the ground .
More importantly , if Dr. Markowsky had expanded his investigation beyond a very simplistic measure of height vs. width , he likely would have found a much richer body @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ratio in the Parthenon , just as did Donald Duck in the 1959 film , “ Donald in Mathmagic Land.
” Both Devlin and Livio would have been quoting different evidence , measurements and conclusions as well , as would be the many who have since quoted them .
Curiously Dr. Markowsky , in his March 2005 review of Dr. Livio ’ s Golden Ratio book , acknowledges being exposed to the golden ratio in “ a comic book entitled Donald in Mathmagic Land , which later became an animated cartoon.
” In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ didn ’ t show the same level of detail in the golden ratios of the Parthenon that are presented in Disney ’ s animated film by the same name .
One can ’ t help but wonder if his evidence and conclusions might have been different if he ’ d seen the film .
I ’ ve presented evidence for golden ratios in the design of the Parthenon in several of my writings over the years : • My article “ Phi and the Golden Section in Architecture , ” published in 2003 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ My article “ The Parthenon and Phi , the Golden Ratio , ” published on this site in 2013 .
• My article “ Dr .
George Markowsky ’ s “ Misconceptions about the Golden Ratio ” Reviewed , ” published on this site in 2016 .
• My book “ The Golden Ratio – The Divine Beauty of Mathematics , ” published by The Quarto Group in 2018 .
See pages 104-108 .
• My article “ Donald Duck visits the Parthenon in ‘ Mathmagic Land , ” published on this site @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Golden section in architecture – The Parthenon and Greek Architecture , ” published by Dr. Ron Knott ( PhD , Mathematics ) in 1999 also showed the some of the same basic golden ratios .
You can find more detailed high resolution image analyses on the pages listed above , but many of the most apparent golden ratios identified in the proportions of the Parthenon are illustrated in these images .
The golden rectangles and golden ratio divisions on these images were created with pixel-level accuracy using my PhiMatrix software .
So between @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Land ” and my articles listed above , we find evidence that appears to substantiate the application of golden ratios in the following design elements of the Parthenon : • Facade – Overall height vs width , if you accept starting from the second step .
Using that approach , there is then another golden ratio from the bottom of the second step to the top of the columns to the top of the roof .
• Meotope/Triglyph – Rectangles formed by each pair of Meotopes and Triglyphs .
• Entablature/Architrave – Height @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Architrave .
• Frieze/Roofline – Height from the Column top to the top of the Frieze to the height of the roof top .
• Capitals/Entablature – Width of each pair of column Capitals in relation to the height of the Entablature .
• Perimeter Outside Columns/Chamber wall – Center points of the exterior columns in relation to the position of the wall between the two interior chambers .
• Perimeter Columns/Inner columns – Center points of the exterior columns in relation to the centers of the four columns in the smaller @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – Width of the inner enclosed structure of the Parthenon in relation to the width of the entry way into the large interior chamber .
Even if you don ’ t accept every single appearance presented above as a golden ratio , it would be inaccurate to say that “ no evidence exists ” or that this is a story “ without foundation.
” It would also not be reasonable to assume that these appearances were all due to coincidence , without any awareness or intent by the designers .
Frankly , we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ratio did NOT appear among the Parthenon ’ s numerous precise mathematical proportions .
It is truly one of the easiest ratios to create with simple geometric constructions , and likely the most ubiquitous ratio in mathematics , geometry and nature .
The constructions below illustrate illustrate this fact : Interestingly , one of the simplest geometric constructions of the golden ratio appears to be applied and illustrated in design of the frieze .
It appears fourteen times actually , so it ’ s hard to miss : The Greeks were clearly very @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proportions they incorporated into the Parthenon ’ s design .
If the golden ratio were not used , a more compelling argument to support this premise would require developing a theory for what the Greeks DID in fact use , rather than to simply say that no evidence exists .
The analysis in the photo below shows that other simple integer ratios like 3:2 and 5:3 do not match the proportions used in the frieze , but the golden ratio does : Once a golden ratio has been determined with a simple geometric @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the arts is even simpler yet .
All that is required is two sticks or rods of equal length that are attached at their golden ratio point .
This then creates a measuring divider that can identify the golden ratio of any dimension in a second or two .
Dividers have been in common use in construction since the time of the Greeks and Romans .
Beyond the physical evidence itself , history tells us that followers of Pythagoras were using the golden ratio-filled pentagram as their secret symbol around 500 BC .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ The Canon , ” his treatise on aesthetic theories of the mathematical bases of artistic perfection .
It wasn ’ t until 300 BC that Euclid had written the first known recorded references to the golden ratio in numerous geometric constructions in his treatise Elements , but according to Britannica : Hippocrates thus compiled the first known work on the elements of geometry nearly a century before Euclid , right around the time when Polykleitos wrote on the mathematical basis of artistic perfection and when the Parthenon was being constructed between 447 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s reasonable to assume that knowledge of the golden ratio could have existed when the Parthenon was designed and built .
For those who like TV crime shows , you may know that there are three elements of evidence often required to establish that a crime has been committed .
While applying the golden ratio to the Parthenon would certainly not be a crime , we can use a forensic analysis approach to assess whether there is a case for its use .
The three elements of evidence are : • Motive – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
• Means – Having the tools or methods to commit act , and • Opportunity – Having the occasion present itself to allow the act to take place .
For someone to become a suspect in a criminal investigation , all three must be established .
So in the case of the Parthenon , we know the Greeks valued incorporating mathematics and geometry into their art and architecture ( motive ) .
We know that the pentagram with its golden ratio proportions was recognized and revered for its special properties at least @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Parthenon , and that this evolved into a very sophisticated set of constructions and propositions in Euclid ’ s Elements by one hundred years after ( means ) .
We know that the Parthenon , as the pinnacle of Greek architecture , would have presented a wonderful opportunity to apply the golden ratio in its design ( opportunity ) .
So hopefully you now have enough evidence and information to decide for yourself : Does it seem most likely that the Greeks applied the golden ratio in the design of the Parthenon @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that won ’ t go away ?
PANIC : Patriots Are Now In Control Body For Awareness Project : Your body .
Your clothes .
Your truth .
On Sale Now .
Stillness in the Storm Editor : Why did we post this ?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world , which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom .
The news also serves as a social connection tool , as we tend @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and believe the things we do .
With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand , the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper .
Not sure how to make sense of this ?
Want to learn how to discern like a pro ?
Read this essential guide to discernment , analysis of claims , and understanding the truth in a world of deception : 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools .
Stillness in the Storm Editor ’ s note : Did you find a spelling @ @ @ @ @ @ @ email to corrections @ stillnessinthestorm.com , with the error and suggested correction , along with the headline and url .
Do you think this article needs an update ?
Or do you just have some feedback ?
Send us an email at sitsshow @ gmail.com .
Thank you for reading .

Spread the love
(Gary Meisner) The application of the golden ratio by the designers of the Parthenon is a common point of confusion and dissension. Multiple seemingly credible sources state that the golden ratio was not used in the design of the Parthenon. Most of these, however, trace back to a single very inaccurate and incomplete article as their source. Once this information was published by a few recognized authorities, more people yet then quoted them as a “reputable” source, and the misinformation grew.
Related
Source – Golden Number
by Gary Meisner, September 13th, 2020
No disrespect is intended for those who have unknowingly created or passed along inaccurate or incomplete information. The objective here is to investigate the sources, examine the evidence, present the facts, and allow readers to have all information needed to come to their own evidence-based conclusions.
What the expert sources say
As of this writing in August 2020, Wikipedia’s article on the Parthenon says this:
Some studies of the Acropolis, including of the Parthenon and its façade, have conjectured that many of its proportions approximate the golden ratio. However, such theories have been discredited by more recent studies, which have shown that the proportions of the Parthenon do not match the golden proportion. [66][67]“
Wikipedia’s article on the Golden Ratio says this:
Certainly, the oft repeated assertion that the Parthenon in Athens is based on the golden ratio is not supported by actual measurements. In fact, the entire story about the Greeks and golden ratio seems to be without foundation. [114]“
Checking the dissenting sources
Let’s look more closely at the references presented in the Wikipedia articles to understand the basis for their claims that the golden ratio’s appearance is unsupported and now discredited.
Dr. George Markowsky on the Parthenon
Reference 66 is to the 1992 article “Misconceptions about the Golden Ratio” by Dr. George Markowsky. I reviewed this article in 2016, and found that Dr. Markowksy had performed only a single relevant calculation of the Parthenon’s width to height. He referenced seven sources who claimed that the Parthenon did embody the golden ratio. He presented Figure 6 alone below to illustrate the claimed fit. Among his references are similar illustrations by David Bergamini in “Mathematics” and Theoni Pappas in “The Joy of Mathematics.”
Markowsky Parthenon illustration
Bergamini – Mathematics
Theoni Pappas – Joy of Mathematics
From the various sources, Dr. Markowsky calculated the ratio of the width of 101′ 3.75″ from Tractenberg and Hyman to the “height of the apex above the stylobate” of 59 feet from Rossiter. This yields a ratio of 1.717, which is not the golden ratio of 1.618…+. He references a quote by Christine Flon in “The World Atlas of Architecture“:
On the basis of a small number of ancient texts, an effort has been made to find (in buildings sufficiently well preserved) a coherent system of proportions based on the golden number, pi or on the universal ratios of the Pythagoreans. Almost always, when all possible measurements have been taken, some system of geometric figures or some modular common denominator has come to light. However, the validity of this research remains uncertain: it is easy to overestimate the importance of an architectural speculation, It is not unlikely that some architects, in imitation of sculptors such as Polycleitos, should have wished to base their works on a strict system of ratios, but it would be wrong to generalize. In the conservative environment of ancient Greece, architectural activity was an empirical practice in which experience and intuition, that is to say “mastery”, played a large part.”
I found the “World Atlas of Architecture” to be a wonderful resource on the history and style of architecture, but there is not one building in its 408 pages which references the mathematics of a building’s design. This is true even on its coverage of the UN Secretariat Building, whose architect, Le Corbusier publicly advanced his golden-ratio based system of design, called” Le Modulor”. So as good as this book is, it’s approach to the mathematics of design was to punt rather than to tackle the topic.
With Flon’s opinion on the “uncertain validity” and “speculation” in support of his finding though, Markowsky summarily dismissed the golden ratio of the Parthenon without any investigation into any of its other elements of design, and moved to the next topic in his article, which I review separately here.
In doing so, Markowsky notably omits the words of Flon that follow:
One thing is certain though: in the great civil and religious buildings there was a module, often the diameter of the column at its narrowest point— a basic dimension from which all the others were calculated. This made the designing and the dressing of the blocks easier, and permitted both the application and variation of proven formulae. In most cases the architect would not venture beyond simple arithmetic proportions which would ensure the uniformity of the building.”
Also of interest is that while Flon says that we should not generalize, she also notes that “it is not unlikely that some architects, in imitation of sculptors such as Polycleitos, should have wished to base their works on a strict system of ratios.“
Polykleitos wrote a treatise around 450 BC called “The Canon,” which comes from the Greek word kanon, meaning measure, rule, or law. It is a theoretical work that discusses ideal mathematical proportions for the parts of the human body, and aesthetic theories of the mathematical bases of artistic perfection. Though the text is lost to history, he is quoted as saying,
Perfection … comes about little by little (para mikron) through many numbers”.
According to the Getty Museum, references to “The Canon” in other ancient books:
imply that its main principle was expressed by the Greek words symmetria and rhythmos. By this Polykleitos meant that the work should be composed of clearly definable parts, all related to one another through a system of ideal mathematical proportions and balance.”
Symmetria means ‘common measure’. The Greeks interpreted this word, as the harmony of the different parts of an object, the good proportions between its constituent parts. This is exactly what the closer examination of the Parthenon (below) reveals. Rhythmos refers to the proportions and patterns as an exploration of the nature of motion.
Polykleitas worked alongside other Athenian sculptors, including Phidias, who designed the status of Athena and others for the Parthenon. Work on the Parthenon began in 447 BC, so the impact of Polykleitos’ treatise on artistic perfection could very well have had a very timely and direct impact on the design on Parthenon, and not be subject to the “generalization” Flon made in reference to all Greek architecture.
Dr. Mario Livio on the Parthenon
Reference 67 that follows on Wikipedia is to pages 74-75 of Dr. Mario Livio’s 2003 book, “The Golden Ratio: The Story of PHI, the World’s Most Astonishing Number.” Dr. Livio references books by Adolph Zeising (“The Golden Section”) and Matila Ghyka (“The Golden Number“) that claim this golden rectangle, and yet another golden ratio, but he then turns to Dr. Markowsky’s article. Dr. Livio includes yet another single, simple illustration of the Parthenon bordered by a golden rectangle. He refers to the same width to height measurements and ratio as Markowsky. He too quotes Christine Flon, and thus concludes “this is far less certain than many books would like us to believe and is not particularly well supported by the actual dimensions of the Parthenon.” Again, none of the many other design elements of the Parthenon are illustrated or addressed.
Reference number 112 in the Wikipedia article on the Golden Ratio appears in the caption of the the photo of the Parthenon, but we find that the reference simply says “Livio 2003, pp. 74–75,” duplicating the reference 67 that has already been given.
Dr. Keith Devlin on the Parthenon
Reference number 114 in the Wikipedia article on the Parthenon is from page 54 of Dr. Keith Devlin’s book, “The Math Instinct.” In the copy I purchased, the reference to the Parthenon appears on page 108. There the text simply states anecdotally, “Certainly, the oft repeated assertion that the Parthenon in Athens is based on the golden ratio is not supported by actual measurements. In fact, the entire story about the Greeks and the golden ratio seems to be without foundation.” Dr. Devlin presents no discussion at all of any evidence. No illustrations of the Parthenon are presented. No measurements or anything else are offered to support this statement.
I did a Google search to find that Dr. Devlin revealed his source in two of his articles on the Mathematics Association of America site:
“Good stories, pity they’re not true,” June 2004, where referring to the Parthenon, architects in general, Leonardo da Vinci and painters in general, he states, “there’s not a shred of evidence to support any of these claims, and good reason to believe they are completely false, as University of Maine mathematician George Markowsky pointed out in his article “Misconceptions About the Golden Ratio”, published in the College Mathematics Journal in January 1992.”
“The Myth That Will Not Go Away,” May 2007, where he states, “Then I read an excellent article by the University of Maine mathematician George Markowsky, titled “Misconceptions about the golden ratio”, published in the College Mathematics Journal in January 1992. In his article, Markowsky subjected many of the common claims about the golden ratio to a fairly rigorous review, and found that quite a few of them come up decidedly short. Further evidence against many of the common claims you see made about the golden ratio were provided by writer Mario Livio in his 2002 book “The Golden Ratio: The Story of PHI, the World’s Most Astonishing Number.”
So it turns out that Devlin’s “two” sources were Markowsky and Livio, and Livio’s source was Markowsky. Unfortunately, as of this writing many other sources are now quoting this “evidence” and accept the conclusions of Markowsky, Devlin and Livio as credible and established.
Devlin is a noted author on mathematics and NPR’s “The Math Guy.” Livio is also an accomplished author on mathematics and science, and widely recognized astrophysicist. These gentlemen are highly intelligent, and accomplished and recognized in their fields. Their words have broad impact, even if in this particular situation their positions were lacking in evidence and analysis.
In the end, none of these very recognized sources who stated that the golden ratios are not supported by the measurements did anything to go beyond a very simplistic and superficial calculation of the Parthenon’s width to height, and even this was done inaccurately. This lack of evidence and analysis presented to support their statements is indeed unfortunate.
Flaws in the Markowsky analysis
Before we examine what the evidence actually shows for golden ratios in the design of the Parthenon, we should understand this: If the golden ratio DOES exist, why did Dr. Markowsky not find it? The answer is surprisingly simple.
Note that Markowsky’s height measurement of 59 feet is based on “height of the apex above the stylobate.” This means that he measured from the base of the columns.
Note too that in ALL of the Parthenon illustrations presented, including Markowsky’s, that the golden rectangle is NOT based on the base of the columns “above the stylobyte.” Rather, the base of the golden rectangle INCLUDES the steps of the stylobyte that lead up to the Parthenon.”
Let’s determine what his results would have been if his measurements had been consistent with the supporting illustrations.
Classic architecture terms
Markowsky Parthenon illustration
Markowsky illustration overlayed to actual Parthenon Photo
Source: Metron Ariston, 2002
According to the book Metron Ariston (2002), the height of the first two steps descending from the stylobyte are 1.811 feet and 1.680 feet, respectively. If we add that to the height included in the Parthenon’s height, we get 62.491 feet instead of 59 feet.
The ratio of the width of 101′ 3.75″ to revised height of 62.491′ is 1.621, a variance of only 0.20% from the golden ratio of 1.618 (to four digits)! This is well within the tolerance that Dr. Markowsky established for the basis of his investigation and conclusions.
It makes perfect sense too that any measure of the Parthenon’s height to width should include its stylobye/base, for this is critical to what the observers sees as “The Parthenon.” If asked to draw the Parthenon, anyone with good observational skills would draw the structure with its base foundation, not just columns on the ground.
More importantly, if Dr. Markowsky had expanded his investigation beyond a very simplistic measure of height vs. width, he likely would have found a much richer body of evidence for appearances of the golden ratio in the Parthenon, just as did Donald Duck in the 1959 film, “Donald in Mathmagic Land.” Both Devlin and Livio would have been quoting different evidence, measurements and conclusions as well, as would be the many who have since quoted them.
Curiously Dr. Markowsky, in his March 2005 review of Dr. Livio’s Golden Ratio book, acknowledges being exposed to the golden ratio in “a comic book entitled Donald in Mathmagic Land, which later became an animated cartoon.” In his defense, the comic book unfortunately didn’t show the same level of detail in the golden ratios of the Parthenon that are presented in Disney’s animated film by the same name. One can’t help but wonder if his evidence and conclusions might have been different if he’d seen the film.
What the evidence shows
I’ve presented evidence for golden ratios in the design of the Parthenon in several of my writings over the years:
Note that “The Golden section in architecture – The Parthenon and Greek Architecture,” published by Dr. Ron Knott (PhD, Mathematics) in 1999 also showed the some of the same basic golden ratios.
Parthenon – Ron Knott
You can find more detailed high resolution image analyses on the pages listed above, but many of the most apparent golden ratios identified in the proportions of the Parthenon are illustrated in these images. The golden rectangles and golden ratio divisions on these images were created with pixel-level accuracy using my PhiMatrix software.
Parthenon Golden Ratio Summary
So between Disney’s “Donald in Mathmagic Land” and my articles listed above, we find evidence that appears to substantiate the application of golden ratios in the following design elements of the Parthenon:
Facade:
Facade – Overall height vs width, if you accept starting from the second step. Using that approach, there is then another golden ratio from the bottom of the second step to the top of the columns to the top of the roof.
– Overall height vs width, if you accept starting from the second step. Using that approach, there is then another golden ratio from the bottom of the second step to the top of the columns to the top of the roof. Triglyph – Rectangles formed by the Triglyphs.
– Rectangles formed by the Triglyphs. Meotope/Triglyph – Rectangles formed by each pair of Meotopes and Triglyphs.
– Rectangles formed by each pair of Meotopes and Triglyphs. Entablature/Architrave – Height of the Entablature to the height of the Architrave.
– Height of the Entablature to the height of the Architrave. Frieze/Roofline – Height from the Column top to the top of the Frieze to the height of the roof top.
– Height from the Column top to the top of the Frieze to the height of the roof top. Capitals/Entablature – Width of each pair of column Capitals in relation to the height of the Entablature.
Floor Plan:
Perimeter Outside Columns/Chamber wall – Center points of the exterior columns in relation to the position of the wall between the two interior chambers.
– Center points of the exterior columns in relation to the position of the wall between the two interior chambers. Perimeter Columns/Inner columns – Center points of the exterior columns in relation to the centers of the four columns in the smaller interior room.
– Center points of the exterior columns in relation to the centers of the four columns in the smaller interior room. Building width/Entry width – Width of the inner enclosed structure of the Parthenon in relation to the width of the entry way into the large interior chamber.
Even if you don’t accept every single appearance presented above as a golden ratio, it would be inaccurate to say that “no evidence exists” or that this is a story “without foundation.” It would also not be reasonable to assume that these appearances were all due to coincidence, without any awareness or intent by the designers.
A geometric perspective
Frankly, we should be more surprised if the golden ratio did NOT appear among the Parthenon’s numerous precise mathematical proportions. It is truly one of the easiest ratios to create with simple geometric constructions, and likely the most ubiquitous ratio in mathematics, geometry and nature. The constructions below illustrate illustrate this fact:
Interestingly, one of the simplest geometric constructions of the golden ratio appears to be applied and illustrated in design of the frieze. It appears fourteen times actually, so it’s hard to miss:
The Greeks were clearly very intentional and precise in the numbers and proportions they incorporated into the Parthenon’s design. If the golden ratio were not used, a more compelling argument to support this premise would require developing a theory for what the Greeks DID in fact use, rather than to simply say that no evidence exists. The analysis in the photo below shows that other simple integer ratios like 3:2 and 5:3 do not match the proportions used in the frieze, but the golden ratio does:
An application perspective
Once a golden ratio has been determined with a simple geometric construction, replicating it for application in the arts is even simpler yet. All that is required is two sticks or rods of equal length that are attached at their golden ratio point. This then creates a measuring divider that can identify the golden ratio of any dimension in a second or two. Dividers have been in common use in construction since the time of the Greeks and Romans.
A historical perspective
Beyond the physical evidence itself, history tells us that followers of Pythagoras were using the golden ratio-filled pentagram as their secret symbol around 500 BC.
In about 450 BC, Polykleitos wrote “The Canon,” his treatise on aesthetic theories of the mathematical bases of artistic perfection.
It wasn’t until 300 BC that Euclid had written the first known recorded references to the golden ratio in numerous geometric constructions in his treatise Elements, but according to Britannica:
Euclid compiled his Elements from a number of works of earlier men. Among these are Hippocrates of Chios (flourished c. 440 BCE), not to be confused with the physician Hippocrates of Cos (c. 460–375 BCE). The latest compiler before Euclid was Theudius, whose textbook was used in the Academy and was probably the one used by Aristotle (384–322 BCE).”
Hippocrates thus compiled the first known work on the elements of geometry nearly a century before Euclid, right around the time when Polykleitos wrote on the mathematical basis of artistic perfection and when the Parthenon was being constructed between 447 and 432 BC.
So it’s reasonable to assume that knowledge of the golden ratio could have existed when the Parthenon was designed and built.
A forensic analysis perspective
For those who like TV crime shows, you may know that there are three elements of evidence often required to establish that a crime has been committed. While applying the golden ratio to the Parthenon would certainly not be a crime, we can use a forensic analysis approach to assess whether there is a case for its use. The three elements of evidence are:
Motive – Having a reason to commit the act.
– Having a reason to commit the act. Means – Having the tools or methods to commit act, and
– Having the tools or methods to commit act, and Opportunity – Having the occasion present itself to allow the act to take place.
For someone to become a suspect in a criminal investigation, all three must be established.
So in the case of the Parthenon, we know the Greeks valued incorporating mathematics and geometry into their art and architecture (motive). We know that the pentagram with its golden ratio proportions was recognized and revered for its special properties at least one hundred years before the construction of the Parthenon, and that this evolved into a very sophisticated set of constructions and propositions in Euclid’s Elements by one hundred years after (means). We know that the Parthenon, as the pinnacle of Greek architecture, would have presented a wonderful opportunity to apply the golden ratio in its design (opportunity).
Myth or Misinformation?
So hopefully you now have enough evidence and information to decide for yourself:
Does it seem most likely that the Greeks applied the golden ratio in the design of the Parthenon, or is this just a myth that won’t go away?
WE NEED YOUR HELP! We need to raise $3500 per month, or this site will close down. Please consider becoming a $10 a month donor. (Donate HERE)
Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world, which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom. The news also serves as a social connection tool, as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do. With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand, the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper.
– Justin
Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake? Send an email to corrections@stillnessinthestorm.com, with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at sitsshow@gmail.com. Thank you for reading.
Source:
https://www.goldennumber.net/parthenon-golden-ratio-myth-or-misinformation/


stillnessinthestorm--2020-10-12--12,000-Year-Old Temple Discovered at Kahin Tepe in Turkey (Video)

This is a video post .
See the video below .
Related Praying Medic : QAnon September 8 , 2020 – History Repeats Itself ( Video ) ( Opens in a new browser tab ) Body For Awareness Project : Your clothes can advertise for corporate interests ( Nike , Adidas , etc ) or they can share your truth and evolve consciousness .
Support alt-media and help raise awareness .
Law of One Merch on Sale Now ( New colors and styles uploaded frequently at Stillness in the Storm Store ) .
Stillness in the Storm Editor : Why @ @ @ @ @ @ @ information is an update from one of the many alternative media persons driven to help humanity by providing important information .
Updates of this sort , as cursory as they are , help individuals feel connected to the greater works taking place at this time as well as providing a personal glimpse into the mind of a content creator .
It also serves to humanize such individuals and reveal to the public that alternative media is largely populated by people that work long hours providing information usually for free or for little financial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sense of this ?
Want to learn how to discern like a pro ?
Read this essential guide to discernment , analysis of claims , and understanding the truth in a world of deception : 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools .

We need $2000 per month to pay our costs. Help us one time or recurring. (DONATE HERE)
To sign up for RSS updates, paste this link (https://stillnessinthestorm.com/feed/) into the search field of your preferred RSS Reader or Service (such as Feedly or gReader).
Subscribe to Stillness in the Storm Newsletter
“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.” – Aristotle
This website is supported by readers like you.
If you find our work of value, consider making a donation.
Stillness in the Storm DISCLAIMER: All articles, videos, statements, claims, views and opinions that appear anywhere on this site, whether stated as theories or absolute facts, are always presented by Stillness in the Storm as unverified—and should be personally fact checked and discerned by you, the reader. Any opinions or statements herein presented are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, or agreed to by Stillness, those who work with Stillness, or those who read Stillness. Any belief or conclusion gleaned from content on this site is solely the responsibility of you the reader to substantiate, fact check, and no harm comes to you or those around you. And any actions taken by those who read material on this site is solely the responsibility of the acting party. You are encouraged to think carefully and do your own research. Nothing on this site is meant to be believed without question or personal appraisal.
Content Disclaimer: All content on this site marked with “source – [enter website name and url]” is not owned by Stillness in the Storm. All content on this site that is not originally written, created, or posted as original, is owned by the original content creators, who retain exclusive jurisdiction of all intellectual property rights. Any copyrighted material on this site was shared in good faith, under fair use or creative commons. Any request to remove copyrighted material will be honored, provided proof of ownership is rendered. Send takedown requests to feedback@stillnessinthestorm.com.
What is our mission? Why do we post what we do?
Our mission here is to curate (share) articles and information that we feel is important for the evolution of consciousness. Most of that information is written or produced by other people and organizations, which means it does not represent our views or opinions as managing staff of Stillness in the Storm. Some of the content is written by one of our writers and is clearly marked accordingly. Just because we share a CNN story that speaks badly about the President doesn’t mean we’re promoting anti-POTUS views. We’re reporting on the fact as it was reported, and that this event is important for us to know so we can better contend with the challenges of gaining freedom and prosperity. Similarly, just because we share a pro/anti-[insert issue or topic] content, such as a pro-second amendment piece or an anti-military video doesn’t mean we endorse what is said. Again, information is shared on this site for the purpose of evolving consciousness. In our opinion, consciousness evolves through the process of accumulating knowledge of the truth and contemplating that knowledge to distill wisdom and improve life by discovering and incorporating holistic values. Thus, sharing information from many different sources, with many different perspectives is the best way to maximize evolution. What’s more, the mastery of mind and discernment doesn’t occur in a vacuum, it is much like the immune system, it needs regular exposure to new things to stay healthy and strong. If you have any questions as to our mission or methods please reach out to us at feedback@stillnessinthestorm.com.


stillnessinthestorm--2020-10-12--Deep State Takedown News: October 11th to 12th 2020

This is a video post .
See the videos below .
Related And We Know — October 2nd 2020 : TEN days of DARKNESS/Quarantine ?
RED OCTOBER !
( Video ) Third Eye ( Healing Tonic ) : Pineal Gland Decalcifier , Powerful Nootropic , Supports Pineal Function , Melatonin Regulation , Dream Activation , ( Handcrafted in small batches ) the perfect blend of mushrooms and herbs made from scratch !
Use Promo Code SITS20 for 20 % discount on this and other products in your order .
Third Eye , on Sale NOW !
Stillness in the Storm @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world , which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom .
The news also serves as a social connection tool , as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do .
With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand , the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper .
Not sure how to make sense of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ discern like a pro ?
Read this essential guide to discernment , analysis of claims , and understanding the truth in a world of deception : 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools .
Stillness in the Storm Editor ’ s note : Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake ?
Send an email to corrections @ stillnessinthestorm.com , with the error and suggested correction , along with the headline and url .
Do you think this article needs an update ?
Or do you just have some feedback @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ gmail.com .
Thank you for reading .


stillnessinthestorm--2020-10-12--‘Fahrenheit 451’ Predicted People Would Demand Tyranny

( Barry Brownstein ) Even if it has been a while since you read Fahrenheit 451 , you might remember Ray Bradbury ’ s classic for its portrayal of a dystopian future in which an authoritarian government burns books .
Related Trump To ‘ Strongly Demand ’ Drug Test Of Biden Before Or After Debate Read Fahrenheit 451 again to discover why people wanted their tyrannical government to burn books .
Bradbury wrote Fahrenheit 451 in 1953 , yet the parallels to today ’ s social climate for censorship are haunting .
Bradbury ’ s protagonist is Guy Montag , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s future , burns books .
Today ’ s mainstream and social media are “ custodians of our peace of mind ” as they filter out “ conflicting theory and thought.
” Captain Beatty is Montag ’ s boss .
Beatty explained , “ If you don ’ t want a man unhappy politically , don ’ t give him two sides to a question to worry him ; give him one.
” Today , millions listen daily to reports of case counts of Covid-19 .
Like Bradbury predicted , listeners can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to make sense of the numbers .
Many have little idea that important scientists and doctors have advocated alternatives to lockdowns that could save lives and abate catastrophic impacts on economies .
As in Bradbury ’ s world , many are working tirelessly to disparage and censor alternative views .
After Montag questions his role as a book burner , he recites Dover Beach by Matthew Arnold to neighbors .
His neighbors were shocked at the feelings the poem provoked .
One cries out , “ Silly words , silly words , silly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to hurt people ?
Not enough hurt in the world , you ’ ve got to tease people with stuff like that !
” Incredibly , Bradbury anticipated today ’ s social climate where people claim censorship is justified because someone hurt their feelings .
Beatty explains a dominant social norm justifying censorship : Do not offend minorities .
Bradbury is clear ; “ minorities ” meant practically everyone : Pretending you can “ stay happy all the time ” was another social norm driving popular demand for censorship in Fahrenheit 451 .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ dystopia , to consider conflicting theories makes for unhappiness , so Beatty lauds the fireman ’ s mission and justifies censorship : In Bradbury ’ s future , intellectuals came under scrutiny when ideas conflicted .
The word “ intellectual ” became a “ swear word.
” The public dreaded “ the unfamiliar ” and disdained a world where merit mattered .
Again , Bradbury has Beatty explain the mindset behind such thinking : In Bradbury ’ s dystopia , thinking was not welcome .
Even front porches were eliminated .
One of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Social distancing is today embraced as a way to keep us safe from Covid-19 .
Social distancing also keeps us safe from “ conflicting theories and thoughts.
” Chairs have been removed from social gathering places .
Hallways are quiet .
Nobody stands around the water cooler .
People have few places to talk with each other .
The parallel to porches is haunting .
Perhaps you are sensing a shift in social norms undermining parental rights and the sanctity of the family .
Bradbury foresaw a push for government-funded pre-school .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ today ’ s justification of looting .
Some claim that rioters are merely damaging property , not people .
Before he began to see the evil he was part of , Montag eased his conscience with this similar line of thinking : Warning his readers of policies shaped by the majority , Bradbury writes , Today , politicians claim the right to destroy freedom when they get a majority vote of the people .
This dangerous reasoning is antithetical to the founding principles of this country .
We can take a lesson from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who recognized the consequences of his own self-censorship : How ironic that today , claiming they are “ woke , ” progressives clamor for tyranny and censorship .
In Bradbury ’ s world the “ woke ” saw through the lies of tyranny and censorship .
Bradbury would exhort us to avoid expediency and speak out to prevent the worst .
In his novel , Bradbury didn ’ t take a deep dive into the psychology of saying nothing .
My recent essay on mask mandates by businesses provoked a strong response .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ businesses respond to consumer demand .
Yet , some believe that business policy is being shaped by a small but frightened and very vocal minority who complain loudly to managers about customers not wearing a mask .
Going against the vocal herd takes courage .
In his book The Heart Aroused , poet David Whyte , who works with businesses on organizational change issues , shares a universal story : Whyte explains the CEO made it plain he wanted to hear “ ten.
” Whyte ’ s friend thinks the plan is terrible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ feel the same .
As the CEO goes around the room , Whyte ’ s friend hears his colleague , one by one , say “ ten.
” When it is his turn , “ against everything he believes , ( Whyte ’ s friend ) hears a mouselike , faraway voice , his own , saying ‘ ten.
’ ” According to Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann ’ s theory of the spiral of silence , “ our willingness to express an opinion is a direct result of how popular or unpopular we perceive it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ belief is popular , we will make a point of signaling that we are part of the herd .
Like Whyte ’ s friend , we will avoid expressing our point of view when we sense it will be unpopular .
If you think the public is empowered by social media to express unpopular views , you would be mistaken .
As in Fahrenheit 451 , people censor themselves first , even before Facebook and Twitter add their own censorship .
In 2014 , the Pew Research Center surveyed the public about their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the 2013 Edward Snowden revelations .
The survey revealed that “ people were less willing to discuss the Snowden-NSA story on social media than they were in person.
” Social media was not an outlet for those concerned about expressing an unpopular view .
Today , how many say nothing to their neighbors and colleagues about Covid-19 policies for fear of being accused of not valuing human lives ?
In Fahrenheit 451 , silence helped pave the way for the public ’ s embrace of tyranny .
In 2020 , Fahrenheit 451 is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tale .
To reverse the spiral of silence we must make space for candid conversations by thoughtfully considering alternative viewpoints .
Barry Brownstein is professor emeritus of economics and leadership at the University of Baltimore .
He is the author of The Inner-Work of Leadership .
To receive Barry ’ s essays subscribe at Mindset Shifts .
Stillness in the Storm Editor : Why did we post this ?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world , which leads to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lead to life wisdom .
The news also serves as a social connection tool , as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do .
With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand , the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper .
Not sure how to make sense of this ?
Want to learn how to discern like a pro ?
Read this essential guide to discernment , analysis of claims , and understanding the truth in a world of deception @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools .
Stillness in the Storm Editor ’ s note : Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake ?
Send an email to corrections @ stillnessinthestorm.com , with the error and suggested correction , along with the headline and url .
Do you think this article needs an update ?
Or do you just have some feedback ?
Send us an email at sitsshow @ gmail.com .
Thank you for reading .

Spread the love
(Barry Brownstein) Even if it has been a while since you read Fahrenheit 451, you might remember Ray Bradbury’s classic for its portrayal of a dystopian future in which an authoritarian government burns books.
Related
Source – Waking Times
by Barry Brownstein, September 30th, 2020
Read Fahrenheit 451 again to discover why people wanted their tyrannical government to burn books. Bradbury wrote Fahrenheit 451 in 1953, yet the parallels to today’s social climate for censorship are haunting.
Bradbury’s protagonist is Guy Montag, who, like all firemen in Bradbury’s future, burns books.
In Bradbury’s dystopia, firemen became “custodians of our peace of mind, the focus of our understandable and rightful dread of being inferior; official censors, judges, and executors.”
Today’s mainstream and social media are “custodians of our peace of mind” as they filter out “conflicting theory and thought.” Captain Beatty is Montag’s boss. Beatty explained, “If you don’t want a man unhappy politically, don’t give him two sides to a question to worry him; give him one.”
If you don’t want people debating questions such as Covid-19 policy, Beatty has the ticket: “Cram them full of noncombustible data, chock them so damned full of ‘facts’ they feel stuffed, but absolutely ‘brilliant’ with information. Then they’ll feel they’re thinking, they’ll get a sense of motion without moving.”
Today, millions listen daily to reports of case counts of Covid-19. Like Bradbury predicted, listeners can recite the numbers but have no context to make sense of the numbers. Many have little idea that important scientists and doctors have advocated alternatives to lockdowns that could save lives and abate catastrophic impacts on economies. As in Bradbury’s world, many are working tirelessly to disparage and censor alternative views.
After Montag questions his role as a book burner, he recites Dover Beach by Matthew Arnold to neighbors. His neighbors were shocked at the feelings the poem provoked. One cries out, “Silly words, silly words, silly awful hurting words… Why do people want to hurt people? Not enough hurt in the world, you’ve got to tease people with stuff like that!”
Incredibly, Bradbury anticipated today’s social climate where people claim censorship is justified because someone hurt their feelings.
Beatty explains a dominant social norm justifying censorship: Do not offend minorities. Bradbury is clear; “minorities” meant practically everyone:
Don’t step on the toes of the dog-lovers, the cat-lovers, doctors, lawyers, merchants, chiefs, Mormons, Baptists, Unitarians, second-generation Chinese, Swedes, Italians, Germans, Texans, Brooklynites, Irishmen, people from Oregon or Mexico.
Pretending you can “stay happy all the time” was another social norm driving popular demand for censorship in Fahrenheit 451. Beatty explains,
[Censorship] didn’t come from the Government down. There was no dictum, no declaration, no censorship, to start with, no! Technology, mass exploitation, and minority pressure carried the trick, thank God. Today, thanks to them, you can stay happy all the time, you are allowed to read comics, the good old confessions, or trade journals.
In Bradbury’s dystopia, to consider conflicting theories makes for unhappiness, so Beatty lauds the fireman’s mission and justifies censorship:
The important thing for you to remember, Montag, is we’re the Happiness Boys, the Dixie Duo, you and I and the others. We stand against the small tide of those who want to make everyone unhappy with conflicting theory and thought. We have our fingers in the dyke. Hold steady. Don’t let the torrent of melancholy and dreary philosophy drown our world. We depend on you. I don’t think you realize how important you are, we are, to our happy world as it stands now.
In Bradbury’s future, intellectuals came under scrutiny when ideas conflicted. The word “intellectual” became a “swear word.” The public dreaded “the unfamiliar” and disdained a world where merit mattered. Again, Bradbury has Beatty explain the mindset behind such thinking:
We must all be alike. Not everyone born free and equal, as the Constitution says, but everyone made equal. Each man the image of every other; then all are happy, for there are no mountains to make them cower, to judge themselves against. So! A book is a loaded gun in the house next door. Burn it. Take the shot from the weapon. Breach man’s mind. Who knows who might be the target of the well read man?
In Bradbury’s dystopia, thinking was not welcome. Even front porches were eliminated. One of Montag’s young neighbors explained why:
People sat there sometimes at night, talking when they wanted to talk, rocking, and not talking when they didn’t want to talk. Sometimes they just sat there and thought about things, turned things over… they didn’t want people sitting like that, doing nothing, rocking, talking; that was the wrong kind of social life. People talked too much. And they had time to think.
Social distancing is today embraced as a way to keep us safe from Covid-19. Social distancing also keeps us safe from “conflicting theories and thoughts.” Chairs have been removed from social gathering places. Hallways are quiet. Nobody stands around the water cooler. People have few places to talk with each other. The parallel to porches is haunting.
Perhaps you are sensing a shift in social norms undermining parental rights and the sanctity of the family. Bradbury foresaw a push for government-funded pre-school. Captain Beatty explains,
The home environment can undo a lot you try to do at school. That’s why we’ve lowered the kindergarten age year after year until now we’re almost snatching them from the cradle.
Bradbury also anticipated today’s justification of looting. Some claim that rioters are merely damaging property, not people. Before he began to see the evil he was part of, Montag eased his conscience with this similar line of thinking:
You weren’t hurting anyone, you were hurting only things! And since things really couldn’t be hurt, since things felt nothing, and things don’t scream or whimper.
Warning his readers of policies shaped by the majority, Bradbury writes,
The most dangerous enemy of truth and freedom, the solid unmoving cattle of the majority. Oh, God, the terrible tyranny of the majority.
Today, politicians claim the right to destroy freedom when they get a majority vote of the people. This dangerous reasoning is antithetical to the founding principles of this country.
We can take a lesson from Bradbury’s character Professor Faber, who recognized the consequences of his own self-censorship:
I saw the way things were going, a long time back. I said nothing. I’m one of the innocents who could have spoken up and out when no one would listen to the ‘guilty,’ but I did not speak and thus became guilty myself.
How ironic that today, claiming they are “woke,” progressives clamor for tyranny and censorship. In Bradbury’s world the “woke” saw through the lies of tyranny and censorship. Bradbury would exhort us to avoid expediency and speak out to prevent the worst.
In his novel, Bradbury didn’t take a deep dive into the psychology of saying nothing. My recent essay on mask mandates by businesses provoked a strong response. Many were sympathetic to my point that businesses respond to consumer demand. Yet, some believe that business policy is being shaped by a small but frightened and very vocal minority who complain loudly to managers about customers not wearing a mask.
Going against the vocal herd takes courage. In his book The Heart Aroused, poet David Whyte, who works with businesses on organizational change issues, shares a universal story:
A man I know finds himself in a meeting room at the very edge of speech; he is approaching his moment of reckoning, he is looking for support from his fellow executives around the table … the CEO is pacing up and down on the slate gray carpet. He has asked, in no uncertain terms, for their opinion of the plan he wants to put through. ‘I want to know what you all think about this,’ he demands, ‘on a scale of one to ten.’
Whyte explains the CEO made it plain he wanted to hear “ten.” Whyte’s friend thinks the plan is terrible, and rumors are that other executives feel the same. As the CEO goes around the room, Whyte’s friend hears his colleague, one by one, say “ten.” When it is his turn, “against everything he believes, (Whyte’s friend) hears a mouselike, faraway voice, his own, saying ‘ten.’”
According to Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann’s theory of the spiral of silence, “our willingness to express an opinion is a direct result of how popular or unpopular we perceive it to be.” When we believe our belief is popular, we will make a point of signaling that we are part of the herd. Like Whyte’s friend, we will avoid expressing our point of view when we sense it will be unpopular.
If you think the public is empowered by social media to express unpopular views, you would be mistaken. As in Fahrenheit 451, people censor themselves first, even before Facebook and Twitter add their own censorship.
In 2014, the Pew Research Center surveyed the public about their willingness to freely express their views about the 2013 Edward Snowden revelations. The survey revealed that “people were less willing to discuss the Snowden-NSA story on social media than they were in person.” Social media was not an outlet for those concerned about expressing an unpopular view.
Consistent with the “spiral of silence” theory and compatible with Bradbury’s dystopian future, no matter what the setting, people are reluctant to share an unpopular view. A 2020 Cato survey found 62% “of Americans say the political climate these days prevents them from saying things they believe because others might find them offensive.”
Today, how many say nothing to their neighbors and colleagues about Covid-19 policies for fear of being accused of not valuing human lives? In Fahrenheit 451, silence helped pave the way for the public’s embrace of tyranny. In 2020, Fahrenheit 451 is far more than a chilling, cautionary tale. To reverse the spiral of silence we must make space for candid conversations by thoughtfully considering alternative viewpoints.
About The Author
Barry Brownstein
Barry Brownstein is professor emeritus of economics and leadership at the University of Baltimore. He is the author of The Inner-Work of Leadership. To receive Barry’s essays subscribe at Mindset Shifts.
Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world, which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom. The news also serves as a social connection tool, as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do. With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand, the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper.
– Justin
Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake? Send an email to corrections@stillnessinthestorm.com, with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at sitsshow@gmail.com. Thank you for reading.
Source:
https://www.wakingtimes.com/2020/09/30/fahrenheit-451-predicted-people-would-demand-tyranny/


stillnessinthestorm--2020-10-12--Democrat Senatorial Candidate Steve Bullocks Announces Support for Packing the Supreme Court – Which

Democrat Senatorial Candidate Steve Bullocks Announces Support for Packing the Supreme Court – Which Will Destroy US Constitution

( Jim Hoft ) For several days now Democrat Joe Biden and his running mate Kamala Harris have dodged the question on their plans to pack the Supreme Court .
The Democrat strategy will effectively end the United States as we know it .
Related Honor Her Wishes : RBG Blasted Democrats For Proposing ‘ Bad Idea ’ Of Packing Supreme Court These radical justices will pass every single crazy idea Democrats ever had including open borders , funding health care for illegals , destroying the US energy sector , taxpayer funded abortions until birth , socialist policies , eliminate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , we know what this means .
Democrats are going to pack the US Supreme Court .
On Saturday night Democrat Senatorial Candidate Steve Bullocks in Montana announced that he favored the idea of packing the US Supreme Court with extra liberal justices .
Body For Awareness Project : Your body , your clothes , your truth .
On Sale Now .
Jim Hoft is the founder and editor of The Gateway Pundit , one of the top conservative news outlets in America .
Jim was awarded the Reed Irvine Accuracy in Media @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recipient of the Breitbart Award for Excellence in Online Journalism from the Americans for Prosperity Foundation in May 2016 .
Stillness in the Storm Editor : Why did we post this ?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world , which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom .
The news also serves as a social connection tool , as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ open truth-seeking mind in hand , the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper .
Not sure how to make sense of this ?
Want to learn how to discern like a pro ?
Read this essential guide to discernment , analysis of claims , and understanding the truth in a world of deception : 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools .
Stillness in the Storm Editor ’ s note : Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake ?
Send an email to corrections @ stillnessinthestorm.com @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , along with the headline and url .
Do you think this article needs an update ?
Or do you just have some feedback ?
Send us an email at sitsshow @ gmail.com .
Thank you for reading .

Spread the love
(Jim Hoft) For several days now Democrat Joe Biden and his running mate Kamala Harris have dodged the question on their plans to pack the Supreme Court. The Democrat strategy will effectively end the United States as we know it.
Related
Source – The Gateway Pundit
by Jim Hoft, October 10th, 2020
These radical justices will pass every single crazy idea Democrats ever had including open borders, funding health care for illegals, destroying the US energy sector, taxpayer funded abortions until birth, socialist policies, eliminate gun laws, etc.
Joe Biden dodged the question again today.
Biden is again asked why voters don’t deserve to know his views on court packing. He responds: “The only court packing going on right now is going on with Republicans packing the court right now … I’m going to stay focused on it so we don’t take our eyes off the ball here." pic.twitter.com/E9H5rIXMX2 — Jennifer Epstein (@jeneps) October 10, 2020
Of course, we know what this means.
Democrats are going to pack the US Supreme Court.
On Saturday night Democrat Senatorial Candidate Steve Bullocks in Montana announced that he favored the idea of packing the US Supreme Court with extra liberal justices.
🚨 WOW — Democrat Steve Bullocks comes out in FAVOR of the far-lefts dangerous court-packing plan — and Senator Daines OBLITERATES him for it#MTsen #MTpol pic.twitter.com/YSHmUF4tl7 — Nathan Brand (@NathanBrandWA) October 11, 2020
About The Author
Jim Hoft
Jim Hoft is the founder and editor of The Gateway Pundit, one of the top conservative news outlets in America. Jim was awarded the Reed Irvine Accuracy in Media Award in 2013 and is the proud recipient of the Breitbart Award for Excellence in Online Journalism from the Americans for Prosperity Foundation in May 2016.
Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world, which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom. The news also serves as a social connection tool, as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do. With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand, the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper.
– Justin
Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake? Send an email to corrections@stillnessinthestorm.com, with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at sitsshow@gmail.com. Thank you for reading.
Source:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/10/democrat-senatorial-candidate-steve-bullocks-announces-support-packing-supreme-court-will-destroy-us-constitution/


stillnessinthestorm--2020-10-12--WHO (Accidentally) Confirms Covid is No More Dangerous Than Flu

( Kit Knightly ) The World Health Organization has finally confirmed what we ( and many experts and studies ) have been saying for months – the coronavirus is no more deadly or dangerous than seasonal flu .
The WHO ’ s top brass made this announcement during a special session of the WHO ’ s 34-member executive board on Monday October 5th , it ’ s just nobody seemed to really understand it .
In fact , they didn ’ t seem to completely understand it themselves .
At the session , Dr Michael Ryan , the WHO ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ believe roughly 10 % of the world has been infected with Sars-Cov-2 .
This is their “ best estimate ” , and a huge increase over the number of officially recognised cases ( around 35 million ) .
Dr. Margaret Harris , a WHO spokeswoman , later confirmed the figure , stating it was based on the average results of all the broad seroprevalence studies done around the world .
As much as the WHO were attempting to spin this as a bad thing – Dr Ryan even said it means “ the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ risk.
” – it ’ s actually good news .
And confirms , once more , that the virus is nothing like as deadly as everyone predicted .
The global population is roughly 7.8 billion people , if 10 % have been infected that is 780 million cases .
The global death toll currently attributed to Sars-Cov-2 infections is 1,061,539 .
That ’ s an infection fatality rate of roughly or 0.14 % .
Right in line with seasonal flu and the predictions of many experts from all around the world .
0.14 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the WHO ’ s “ provisional figure ” of 3.4 % back in March .
This figure was used in the models which were used to justify lockdowns and other draconian policies .
In fact , given the over-reporting of alleged Covid deaths , the IFR is likely even lower than 0.14 % , and could show Covid to be much less dangerous than flu .
None of the mainstream press picked up on this .
Though many outlets reported Dr Ryan ’ s words , they all attempted to make it a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Apparently neither they , nor the WHO , were capable of doing the simple maths that shows us this is good news .
And that the Covid sceptics have been right all along .
UPDATE 9/10/20 : In the interest of thoroughness , a desire to rely on primary sources , and not depending purely on mainstream sources ( which may remove or amend articles ) , I decided to find the actual video of Dr Ryan ’ s remarks .
For some reason , although this was an important WHO meeting during @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is hard to find .
The only place you are able to see it is the WHO ’ s own website , and even then you have to scrub through almost 6 hours of footage .
Well , I did that , and you are welcome .
You can ’ t embed the WHO ’ s stream , but I can tell you to go to this page , click “ Session 1 ” and skip to 1:01:33 to hear the exact quote : I will work on getting an audio clip , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sure it does not get memory holed .
Stillness in the Storm Editor : Why did we post this ?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world , which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom .
The news also serves as a social connection tool , as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do .
With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the collective can prosper .
Not sure how to make sense of this ?
Want to learn how to discern like a pro ?
Read this essential guide to discernment , analysis of claims , and understanding the truth in a world of deception : 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools .
Stillness in the Storm Editor ’ s note : Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake ?
Send an email to corrections @ stillnessinthestorm.com , with the error and suggested correction , along with the headline @ @ @ @ @ @ @ article needs an update ?
Or do you just have some feedback ?
Send us an email at sitsshow @ gmail.com .
Thank you for reading .

Spread the love
(Kit Knightly) The World Health Organization has finally confirmed what we (and many experts and studies) have been saying for months – the coronavirus is no more deadly or dangerous than seasonal flu.
Related
Source – Off Guardian
by Kit Knightly, October 8th, 2020
The WHO’s top brass made this announcement during a special session of the WHO’s 34-member executive board on Monday October 5th, it’s just nobody seemed to really understand it.
In fact, they didn’t seem to completely understand it themselves.
At the session, Dr Michael Ryan, the WHO’s Head of Emergencies revealed that they believe roughly 10% of the world has been infected with Sars-Cov-2. This is their “best estimate”, and a huge increase over the number of officially recognised cases (around 35 million).
Dr. Margaret Harris, a WHO spokeswoman, later confirmed the figure, stating it was based on the average results of all the broad seroprevalence studies done around the world.
As much as the WHO were attempting to spin this as a bad thing – Dr Ryan even said it means “the vast majority of the world remains at risk.” – it’s actually good news. And confirms, once more, that the virus is nothing like as deadly as everyone predicted.
The global population is roughly 7.8 billion people, if 10% have been infected that is 780 million cases. The global death toll currently attributed to Sars-Cov-2 infections is 1,061,539.
That’s an infection fatality rate of roughly or 0.14%. Right in line with seasonal flu and the predictions of many experts from all around the world.
0.14% is over 24 times LOWER than the WHO’s “provisional figure” of 3.4% back in March. This figure was used in the models which were used to justify lockdowns and other draconian policies.
In fact, given the over-reporting of alleged Covid deaths, the IFR is likely even lower than 0.14%, and could show Covid to be much less dangerous than flu.
None of the mainstream press picked up on this. Though many outlets reported Dr Ryan’s words, they all attempted to make it a scary headline and spread more panic.
Apparently neither they, nor the WHO, were capable of doing the simple maths that shows us this is good news. And that the Covid sceptics have been right all along.
UPDATE 9/10/20: In the interest of thoroughness, a desire to rely on primary sources, and not depending purely on mainstream sources (which may remove or amend articles), I decided to find the actual video of Dr Ryan’s remarks.
For some reason, although this was an important WHO meeting during an allegedly hyper-serious pandemic, the video is hard to find. The only place you are able to see it is the WHO’s own website, and even then you have to scrub through almost 6 hours of footage. Well, I did that, and you are welcome.
You can’t embed the WHO’s stream, but I can tell you to go to this page, click “Session 1” and skip to 1:01:33 to hear the exact quote:
Our current best estimates tell us that about ten percent of the global population may have been infected by this virus. This varies depending on country, it varies from urban to rural, it varies between different groups.”
I will work on getting an audio clip, for ease of sharing and to make sure it does not get memory holed.
Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world, which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom. The news also serves as a social connection tool, as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do. With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand, the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper.
– Justin
Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake? Send an email to corrections@stillnessinthestorm.com, with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at sitsshow@gmail.com. Thank you for reading.
Source:
https://off-guardian.org/2020/10/08/who-accidentally-confirms-covid-is-no-more-dangerous-than-flu


stillnessinthestorm--2020-10-12--Public Health England Will Combine Flu and Covid Statistics From Now On

( Humans Are Free ) This report summarises the information from the surveillance systems which are used to monitor the Coronavirus Disease 2019 ( COVID-19 ) pandemic in England .
More information on the surveillance systems are available here .
Related Covid Conspiracy : Evidence That the Who ’ s Coronavirus Mortality Rate Was Grossly Overstated – the Cdc ’ s Recent Numbers Prove It The report is based on data from week 39 ( between 21 August and 27 September 2020 ) and for some indicators daily data up to 29 September 2020 .
References to COVID-19 represent the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ name .
Data is reported from week 27 ( week beginning 29 June 2020 ) onwards .
For reports with data prior to week 27 , consult previous reports here .
This will be the last COVID-19 surveillance report , as of 8 October 2020 , the information in this report will be published in a combined Weekly flu and COVID-19 Surveillance Report on GOV.UK .
Stillness in the Storm Editor : Why did we post this ?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know @ @ @ @ @ @ @ leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom .
The news also serves as a social connection tool , as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do .
With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand , the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper .
Not sure how to make sense of this ?
Want to learn how to discern like a pro ?
Read this essential guide to discernment , analysis of claims , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of deception : 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools .
Stillness in the Storm Editor ’ s note : Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake ?
Send an email to corrections @ stillnessinthestorm.com , with the error and suggested correction , along with the headline and url .
Do you think this article needs an update ?
Or do you just have some feedback ?
Send us an email at sitsshow @ gmail.com .
Thank you for reading .


stillnessinthestorm--2020-10-12--There Were so Many Birds Falling out of the Sky That We Didn’t Know What Was Going on in Philadelphi

There Were so Many Birds Falling out of the Sky That We Didn’t Know What Was Going on in Philadelphia

( Strange Sounds ) Stephen Maciejewski dropped to a knee on a Center City sidewalk Wednesday morning and gently scooped up a yellow-billed cuckoo that had smashed into a skyscraper and died on its way to Central America or the West Indies .
Related Fires Have Helped These Endangered Woodpeckers Make a Comeback , and It ’ s a Reminder of Nature ’ s Resiliency “ This probably happened yesterday , ” said Maciejewski , a 71-year-old retired social worker and volunteer for Audubon Pennsylvania .
He labeled a plastic bag with the time , date , and location , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and continued his rounds .
Maciejewski gets emotional when he speaks about all the birds he finds , but nothing , he says , prepared him for what happened Friday .
“ So many birds were falling out of the sky , we didn ’ t know what was going on , ” he said , choking up .
“ It was a really catastrophic event .
The last time something like this happened was in 1948.
“ On Friday , an estimated 1,000 to 1,500 birds flew into buildings in a 3½-block @ @ @ @ @ @ @ early morning during what Maciejewski called a “ perfect storm ” of avian calamity .
That could mean thousands more likely perished elsewhere in the city , he estimated .
He collected 400 birds between 5 and 8 a.m. in the radius he regularly covers roughly spanning 17th to 19th Streets between Market Street and JFK Boulevard — an astonishing number , according to an Audubon Pennsylvania official .
“ There were so many , I was picking up ve at a time , ” Maciejewski said .
“ One guy from building @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in front of me as if it were a collection.
“ Maciejewski logs each bird , noting its flight path , time , and location of impact .
“ There were so many birds I ran out of supplies.
“ He can collect only so many birds because building maintenance crews and Center City District workers sweep detritus , including bird bodies , early each morning before commuters arrive .
Maciejewski has established a rapport with some workers who save birds for him .
“ We collected almost 100 birds on one small @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s haul .
In the five days after , things returned to normal , and Maciejewski has collected no more than 32 birds a morning .
Why so many birds in one day ?
Maciejewski and Audubon Pennsylvania can only guess .
“ This is complicated stuff , ” he said .
It appears weather events lined up for the worst during what was likely the peak of migratory birds ’ flight from Canada , Maine , Upstate New York , and elsewhere toward Central and South America .
A sudden plunge @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to start their flights en masse .
In Philadelphia , Friday brought low cloud cover , light rain , and a full moon , all of which could have pushed the birds lower .
Birds flying from remote Northern habitats might have little experience with glass .
As they reached Philly in the dark , the birds would have been attracted to the lights inside the buildings .
Some of the skyscrapers have indoor atriums , which could have led birds to think they could land there .
On any given morning , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ making it appear they are inside buildings .
Maciejewski began this volunteer effort Sept 1. and will continue through the end of the month .
He said he routinely finds the most downed birds near the two Comcast buildings , BNY Mellon Center , and Logan Square , but also just about anywhere .
On Wednesday morning , the yellow-billed cuckoo was killed at 15th and Market Streets .
Inquirer columnist Inga Saffron has written about the impact of glass buildings on birds .
The U.S. House of Representatives in July introduced the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ approved , it would require buildings to use methods designed to eliminate bird crashes .
“ We have to bring people together to make the glass friendlier to birds , ” Maciejewski said .
“ We ’ re contributing to the extinction of American songbirds.
“ Keith Russell , an ornithologist with Pennsylvania Audubon , said he placed the birds Maciejewski collected Friday in a freezer in his Germantown home .
The birds will be taken to the Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel and logged .
Russell said he still hasn ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the species collected Oct. 2 , but they included various warblers , cuckoos , and others .
The birds are counted each morning for a Pennsylvania Audubon database .
“ This is a very big issue in the world of bird conservation , ” Russell said .
“ The estimates are 350 million to one billion birds die every year colliding with buildings.
“ Russell has been with Pennsylvania Audubon since 2003 .
But before that he worked at the Academy ’ s bird department .
He said the last big bird kill @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when a massive flock struck what was then the PSFS Building at 12th and Market Streets , now a Loews hotel .
“ Think of what the birds experience , ” Russell said .
“ It ’ s like being on a dark highway and you suddenly see headlights .
You don ’ t see anything else but those lights .
On Oct. 2 , birds could have been overtaken by a rainstorm , or conditions .
They think ‘ We ’ ve got to stop , and they see all those buildings @ @ @ @ @ @ @ For birds , it was the equivalent of a couple of jumbo jets going down and everyone dies.
“ Jason D. Weckstein , a professor and ornithologist at Drexel , said the birds will be studied for things such as diet .
“ The birds will go into the collection at the Academy for hundreds of years , ” Weckstein said .
“ They have stories to tell.
“ Hand Mask : It ’ s never been about safety .
Body For Awareness Project : Your body .
Your clothes .
Your truth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
On Sale Now .
Stillness in the Storm Editor : Why did we post this ?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world , which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom .
The news also serves as a social connection tool , as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do .
With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand , the individual @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prosper .
Not sure how to make sense of this ?
Want to learn how to discern like a pro ?
Read this essential guide to discernment , analysis of claims , and understanding the truth in a world of deception : 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools .
Stillness in the Storm Editor ’ s note : Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake ?
Send an email to corrections @ stillnessinthestorm.com , with the error and suggested correction , along with the headline and url .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ update ?
Or do you just have some feedback ?
Send us an email at sitsshow @ gmail.com .
Thank you for reading .

Spread the love
(Strange Sounds) Stephen Maciejewski dropped to a knee on a Center City sidewalk Wednesday morning and gently scooped up a yellow-billed cuckoo that had smashed into a skyscraper and died on its way to Central America or the West Indies.
Related
Source – Strange Sounds
by Staff Writer, October 10th,2020
“This probably happened yesterday,” said Maciejewski, a 71-year-old retired social worker and volunteer for Audubon Pennsylvania. He labeled a plastic bag with the time, date, and location, tucked the slim migrator into it, and continued his rounds.
Maciejewski gets emotional when he speaks about all the birds he finds, but nothing, he says, prepared him for what happened Friday.
“So many birds were falling out of the sky, we didn’t know what was going on,” he said, choking up. “It was a really catastrophic event. The last time something like this happened was in 1948.“
On Friday, an estimated 1,000 to 1,500 birds flew into buildings in a 3½-block radius of Center City overnight and into early morning during what Maciejewski called a “perfect storm” of avian calamity. That could mean thousands more likely perished elsewhere in the city, he estimated.
He collected 400 birds between 5 and 8 a.m. in the radius he regularly covers roughly spanning 17th to 19th Streets between Market Street and JFK Boulevard — an astonishing number, according to an Audubon Pennsylvania official.
“There were so many, I was picking up
ve at a time,” Maciejewski said. “One guy from building maintenance dumped 75 living and dead birds in front of me as if it were a collection.“
Maciejewski logs each bird, noting its flight path, time, and location of impact.
“There were so many birds I ran out of supplies.“
He can collect only so many birds because building maintenance crews and Center City District workers sweep detritus, including bird bodies, early each morning before commuters arrive. Maciejewski has established a rapport with some workers who save birds for him.
“We collected almost 100 birds on one small roof,” he said of Friday’s haul.
In the five days after, things returned to normal, and Maciejewski has collected no more than 32 birds a morning.
Why so many birds in one day?
Maciejewski and Audubon Pennsylvania can only guess.
“This is complicated stuff,” he said.
It appears weather events lined up for the worst during what was likely the peak of migratory birds’ flight from Canada, Maine, Upstate New York, and elsewhere toward Central and South America. A sudden plunge in temperatures could have prompted the birds to start their flights en masse.
In Philadelphia, Friday brought low cloud cover, light rain, and a full moon, all of which could have pushed the birds lower. Birds flying from remote Northern habitats might have little experience with glass.
As they reached Philly in the dark, the birds would have been attracted to the lights inside the buildings. Some of the skyscrapers have indoor atriums, which could have led birds to think they could land there.
On any given morning, street trees reflect in the glass, making it appear they are inside buildings.
Maciejewski began this volunteer effort Sept 1. and will continue through the end of the month. He said he routinely finds the most downed birds near the two Comcast buildings, BNY Mellon Center, and Logan Square, but also just about anywhere. On Wednesday morning, the yellow-billed cuckoo was killed at 15th and Market Streets.
Inquirer columnist Inga Saffron has written about the impact of glass buildings on birds. The U.S. House of Representatives in July introduced the Bird-Safe Buildings Act of 2019. If approved, it would require buildings to use methods designed to eliminate bird crashes.
“We have to bring people together to make the glass friendlier to birds,” Maciejewski said. “We’re contributing to the extinction of American songbirds.“
Keith Russell, an ornithologist with Pennsylvania Audubon, said he placed the birds Maciejewski collected Friday in a freezer in his Germantown home. The birds will be taken to the Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel and logged.
Russell said he still hasn’t been able to sort through all the species collected Oct. 2, but they included various warblers, cuckoos, and others. The birds are counted each morning for a Pennsylvania Audubon database.
“This is a very big issue in the world of bird conservation,” Russell said. “The estimates are 350 million to one billion birds die every year colliding with buildings.“
Russell has been with Pennsylvania Audubon since 2003. But before that he worked at the Academy’s bird department.
He said the last big bird kill of this scope happened 72 years ago when a massive flock struck what was then the PSFS Building at 12th and Market Streets, now a Loews hotel.
“Think of what the birds experience,” Russell said. “It’s like being on a dark highway and you suddenly see headlights. You don’t see anything else but those lights. On Oct. 2, birds could have been overtaken by a rainstorm, or conditions. They think ‘We’ve got to stop, and they see all those buildings and bright lights. …‘
“For birds, it was the equivalent of a couple of jumbo jets going down and everyone dies.“
Jason D. Weckstein, a professor and ornithologist at Drexel, said the birds will be studied for things such as diet.
“The birds will go into the collection at the Academy for hundreds of years,” Weckstein said. “They have stories to tell.“
Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world, which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom. The news also serves as a social connection tool, as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do. With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand, the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper.
– Justin
Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake? Send an email to corrections@stillnessinthestorm.com, with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at sitsshow@gmail.com. Thank you for reading.
Source:
https://strangesounds.org/2020/10/birds-mass-death-philadelphia-buildings.html