stillnessinthestorm--2020-12-14--The Supreme Court’s Rejection Of Texas’s Election Lawsuit Failed The Constitution

( Margot Cleveland ) It is hard to believe the justices put the constitutional question above their desire to avoid appearing to meddle in the 2020 election .
Related Bernie Sanders Admits Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats Walked Away from Coronavirus Relief Bill Offered by Republicans Late Friday , the Supreme Court rejected Texas ’ s election-related lawsuit against fellow states Pennsylvania , Michigan , Wisconsin , and Georgia .
The Supreme Court was right—and wrong .
A week ago today , Texas filed a Motion for Leave to file a Bill of Complaint in the U.S. Supreme Court against @ @ @ @ @ @ @ related to the 2020 election .
Texas also sought preliminary injunctive relief to prevent the putative defendant states from taking further actions related to the election .
Two days later , the attorneys general for the named states filed their responses , all asserting Texas lacked “ standing ” or the right to sue , because Texas , as a state , suffered no injury from the claimed violations of the election code .
Texas countered with a reply brief early Friday .
A bevy of additional filings also hit the Supreme Court @ @ @ @ @ @ @ legislators , governors , even random Americans seeking to file amicus curiae , or friend of the court , briefs either supporting or condemning Texas ’ lawsuit .
President Trump and a few states also sought to intervene or join in the case .
But Friday evening the Supreme Court closed the case by denying Texas ’ s request to file its complaint against the four swing states .
“ Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections , ” the unsigned short @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , read .
Accordingly , the Supreme Court denied Texas ’ s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint “ for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution.
” Justice Samuel Alito issued a separate statement , joined by Justice Thomas , explaining that in their view the Supreme Court lacks the “ discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction , ” and thus Alito and Thomas would have granted Texas ’ s “ motion to file @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the two-justice statement continued : “ but [ we ] would not grant other relief , and [ we ] express no view on any other issue.
” The Supreme Court ’ s resolution thus “ addressed ” two separate questions , the first a narrow procedural question : Whether the U.S. Supreme Court must allow a state to file a complaint against another state .
Current Supreme Court precedent holds the high court retains discretion to decide whether to accept a lawsuit between two or more states .
The Constitution provides the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or the power to hear the case initially for such cases .
The Supreme Court has “ exclusive jurisdiction ” for such lawsuits , meaning no other court has the power to hear a case when a state sues another state .
Nonetheless , the Supreme Court has held that it is not required to accept a complaint filed by one state against another .
That is why , to initiate its lawsuit , Texas filed a “ Motion for Leave , ” or a motion asking permission to file its complaint .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Court did on Friday was to deny Texas “ leave ” or permission to file the complaint against the four putative defendant states .
Several points on this apparent procedural-punting merit mention : First , the outcome of the case would have been no different had the Supreme Court granted Texas permission to file the Bill of Complaint because the reason for the denial of leave—Texas ’ s lack of standing—would equally demand the dismissal of the complaint once accepted .
Second , while in the Alito-Thomas statement both jurists stressed their view @ @ @ @ @ @ @ discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case ” between states , that only two justices expressed this view does not mean that more do not agree .
Rather , given the compressed time frame for resolution , the other justices may have believed prudence dictated the Supreme Court apply its current precedent and leave reconsideration—and comment—on the procedural question to another day .
Also , as mentioned above , there was no need for the Supreme Court to revisit this precedent because , even had the court @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the court ’ s ruling on standing would have required prompt dismissal of the complaint in any event .
Third , while Justices Alito and Thomas would have granted Texas ’ s “ motion to file the bill of complaint , ” the two conservative justices made clear that they “ would not grant other relief.
” Thus , a unanimous Supreme Court would have denied Texas what it sought—a ruling that the state legislatures must name electors anew .
Justices Alito and Thomas , however , added that they “ express @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other issue , ” showing their views on the merits proved more nuanced than many have reported , including the court ’ s view that Texas lacked standing to sue .
The procedural question Texas ’ s lawsuit raised , however , holds little import to Americans concerned about the integrity of the 2020 election .
However , because the court rejected Texas ’ s case for lack of standing , the court left unanswered Texas ’ s complaints .
Article III of the Constitution limits the power of federal courts to decide @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Supreme Court precedent makes clear that for a dispute to fall within the Article III power of a court , a plaintiff must have “ standing , ” and at its “ constitutional minimum ” standing requires : ( 1 ) the plaintiff to have suffered a concrete injury ; ( 2 ) that the injury be fairly traceable to the defendant ’ s actions ; and ( 3 ) a favorable decision by the court will redress the injury .
In Friday ’ s order , the Supreme Court , without elaboration @ @ @ @ @ @ @ demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections , ” and thus concluded the Lone Star State lacked Article III standing .
The justices were correct that Texas lacks an “ judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections , ” but it was the framing of the issue that made the answer self-evident : The court ’ s abbreviated decision failed to address Texas ’ s true complaint—that Pennsylvania , Michigan , Wisconsin , and Georgia violated the Equal Protection @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s Clauses of the Constitution , and in doing so harmed Texas as a state .
Of course , because the justices had Texas ’ s bill of complaint , by declining to exercise jurisdiction over the case , the seven justices all concluded that the facts Texas alleged were insufficient to confer standing .
( The same can not be said for Alito and Thomas , who expressed no opinion on standing , the court ’ s framing of the issue , or the merits of Texas ’ s claims . )
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ s constitutional claims , and by not providing any reasoning for its decision—omissions likely needed for the court to maintain its near-unanimous agreement—the Supreme Court created the appearance that it does not care about constitutional violations .
When the question of standing is considered against Texas ’ s allegations of violations of the Elector ’ s Clause , it is hard to believe the court does .
Or , rather , given their refusal to address Texas ’ s Elector ’ s Clause claim , it is hard to believe the justices put @ @ @ @ @ @ @ avoid appearing to meddle in the 2020 election .
The Elector ’ s Clause claim presented the court a much different scenario than the Equal Protection and Due Process claims Texas also raised .
As the responding states stressed in their briefs , both the Equal Protection Clause and the Due Process Clause protect only “ persons , ” providing : “ Nor shall any state deprive any person of life , liberty , or property , without due process of law ; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Texas is not a “ person.
” While Texas argued it could represent its citizens and its electors ’ rights under the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses , Pennsylvania , Michigan , Wisconsin , and Georgia provided some strong counter-arguments in their response briefs .
A few sentences by the court on its reasoning would provide Americans concerned with the legitimacy of the election some assurance .
Texas ’ s Elector ’ s Clause claim , however , required more : It required the court to accept the complaint and address , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s claim , because Texas was not merely challenging the manner of the other states ’ elections .
The Elector ’ s Clause of the Constitution , in Article II , Section 1 , Clause 2 , provides that “ [ e ] ach state shall appoint , in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct , a number of electors , equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress.
” In Bush v. Gore , in a three-justice concurrence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ clause of the Constitution “ convey [ s ] the broadest power of determination ” and “ leaves it to the legislature exclusively to define the method ” of appointment of electors .
Also , “ a significant departure from the legislative scheme for appointing Presidential electors presents a federal constitutional question.
” Based on these principles in Bush v. Gore , the three-justice concurrence reasoned that because the Florida Supreme Court ’ s decision conflicted with the legislative mandate , it violated Article II .
Texas ’ s bill of complaint tracked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wisconsin , Michigan , and Georgia all departed from the election rules mandated by their respective legislative bodies and thus violated the Elector ’ s Clause .
Texas ’ s complaint and briefs then detailed the various extra-legislative modification or violations of the legislatively established election mandates .
For example , Pennsylvania election officials violated the rules established by the state legislature in multiple ways , including by inspecting absentee ballots before election day then providing third-party identifying information for the voters , with those third parties then contacting the voters , whom @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the ballots , even though curing was not authorized by the legislative body .
Texas provided similar examples of extra-legislative changes to the election rules for Wisconsin , Michigan , and Georgia .
Why was that not enough for the Supreme Court ?
What was lacking ?
The justices said standing— “ a judicially cognizable interest ” —but how can the state of Texas not have a judicially cognizable interest in her sister states living up to the compact they entered when they entered the Union ?
Texas attempted in its briefs to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in who serves as vice president , given the vice president ’ s tie-breaking status in the Senate and senators ’ role as the representatives of the states .
But a simpler and stronger argument came in a brief submitted by would-be amicus curiae Citizen ’ s United : On Friday , the Supreme Court voted not to enforce those standards .
Maybe there is a good reason .
Maybe Rehnquist ’ s view was wrong .
Maybe the court found the alleged violations not “ significant ” enough to reach the level @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ significant ” would a violation have to be ? )
Maybe the court viewed a violation of the compact on which our country was founded as beyond its purview .
There might be a satisfactory answer , but Americans have yet to hear it .
And that was wrong , both for the court and the country .
Body For Awareness Project : Your body .
Your clothes .
Your truth .
On Sale Now .
Stillness in the Storm Editor : Why did we post this ?
The news is important @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we come to know new things about the world , which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom .
The news also serves as a social connection tool , as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do .
With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand , the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper .
Not sure how to make sense of this ?
Want to learn how to discern like a pro ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ analysis of claims , and understanding the truth in a world of deception : 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools .
Stillness in the Storm Editor ’ s note : Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake ?
Send an email to corrections @ stillnessinthestorm.com , with the error and suggested correction , along with the headline and url .
Do you think this article needs an update ?
Or do you just have some feedback ?
Send us an email at sitsshow @ gmail.com .
Thank you @ @ @

Spread the love
(Margot Cleveland) It is hard to believe the justices put the constitutional question above their desire to avoid appearing to meddle in the 2020 election.
Related Bernie Sanders Admits Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats Walked Away from Coronavirus Relief Bill Offered by Republicans
Source – The Federalist
by Margot Cleveland, December 14th, 2020
Late Friday, the Supreme Court rejected Texas’s election-related lawsuit against fellow states Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia. The Supreme Court was right—and wrong.
A week ago today, Texas filed a Motion for Leave to file a Bill of Complaint in the U.S. Supreme Court against the four states, charging constitutional violations related to the 2020 election. Texas also sought preliminary injunctive relief to prevent the putative defendant states from taking further actions related to the election.
Two days later, the attorneys general for the named states filed their responses, all asserting Texas lacked “standing” or the right to sue, because Texas, as a state, suffered no injury from the claimed violations of the election code. Texas countered with a reply brief early Friday.
A bevy of additional filings also hit the Supreme Court’s docket, with states, legislators, governors, even random Americans seeking to file amicus curiae, or friend of the court, briefs either supporting or condemning Texas’ lawsuit. President Trump and a few states also sought to intervene or join in the case.
But Friday evening the Supreme Court closed the case by denying Texas’s request to file its complaint against the four swing states. “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections,” the unsigned short order, agreed to by seven justices, read. Accordingly, the Supreme Court denied Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint “for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution.”
Must the Supreme Court Address State Complaints?
Justice Samuel Alito issued a separate statement, joined by Justice Thomas, explaining that in their view the Supreme Court lacks the “discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction,” and thus Alito and Thomas would have granted Texas’s “motion to file the bill of complaint.” Significantly, the two-justice statement continued: “but [we] would not grant other relief, and [we] express no view on any other issue.”
The Supreme Court’s resolution thus “addressed” two separate questions, the first a narrow procedural question: Whether the U.S. Supreme Court must allow a state to file a complaint against another state.
Current Supreme Court precedent holds the high court retains discretion to decide whether to accept a lawsuit between two or more states. The Constitution provides the Supreme Court “original jurisdiction,” or the power to hear the case initially for such cases. The Supreme Court has “exclusive jurisdiction” for such lawsuits, meaning no other court has the power to hear a case when a state sues another state.
Nonetheless, the Supreme Court has held that it is not required to accept a complaint filed by one state against another. That is why, to initiate its lawsuit, Texas filed a “Motion for Leave,” or a motion asking permission to file its complaint. Procedurally, then, what the Supreme Court did on Friday was to deny Texas “leave” or permission to file the complaint against the four putative defendant states.
Behind the Alito-Thomas Separate Statement
Several points on this apparent procedural-punting merit mention: First, the outcome of the case would have been no different had the Supreme Court granted Texas permission to file the Bill of Complaint because the reason for the denial of leave—Texas’s lack of standing—would equally demand the dismissal of the complaint once accepted.
Second, while in the Alito-Thomas statement both jurists stressed their view that the Supreme Court lacked the “discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case” between states, that only two justices expressed this view does not mean that more do not agree.
Rather, given the compressed time frame for resolution, the other justices may have believed prudence dictated the Supreme Court apply its current precedent and leave reconsideration—and comment—on the procedural question to another day. Also, as mentioned above, there was no need for the Supreme Court to revisit this precedent because, even had the court granted Texas permission to file the complaint, the court’s ruling on standing would have required prompt dismissal of the complaint in any event.
Third, while Justices Alito and Thomas would have granted Texas’s “motion to file the bill of complaint,” the two conservative justices made clear that they “would not grant other relief.” Thus, a unanimous Supreme Court would have denied Texas what it sought—a ruling that the state legislatures must name electors anew.
Justices Alito and Thomas, however, added that they “express[ed] no view on any other issue,” showing their views on the merits proved more nuanced than many have reported, including the court’s view that Texas lacked standing to sue.
Texas’s Complaints Go Unanswered
The procedural question Texas’s lawsuit raised, however, holds little import to Americans concerned about the integrity of the 2020 election. However, because the court rejected Texas’s case for lack of standing, the court left unanswered Texas’s complaints.
Article III of the Constitution limits the power of federal courts to decide “cases” and “controversies.” Supreme Court precedent makes clear that for a dispute to fall within the Article III power of a court, a plaintiff must have “standing,” and at its “constitutional minimum” standing requires: (1) the plaintiff to have suffered a concrete injury; (2) that the injury be fairly traceable to the defendant’s actions; and (3) a favorable decision by the court will redress the injury.
In Friday’s order, the Supreme Court, without elaboration, held that “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections,” and thus concluded the Lone Star State lacked Article III standing.
The justices were correct that Texas lacks an “judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections,” but it was the framing of the issue that made the answer self-evident: The court’s abbreviated decision failed to address Texas’s true complaint—that Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia violated the Equal Protection, Due Process, and Elector’s Clauses of the Constitution, and in doing so harmed Texas as a state.
Of course, because the justices had Texas’s bill of complaint, by declining to exercise jurisdiction over the case, the seven justices all concluded that the facts Texas alleged were insufficient to confer standing. (The same cannot be said for Alito and Thomas, who expressed no opinion on standing, the court’s framing of the issue, or the merits of Texas’s claims.)
Supreme Court Leaves the Constitution Defenseless
But by failing to mention Texas’s constitutional claims, and by not providing any reasoning for its decision—omissions likely needed for the court to maintain its near-unanimous agreement—the Supreme Court created the appearance that it does not care about constitutional violations. When the question of standing is considered against Texas’s allegations of violations of the Elector’s Clause, it is hard to believe the court does. Or, rather, given their refusal to address Texas’s Elector’s Clause claim, it is hard to believe the justices put the constitutional question above their desire to avoid appearing to meddle in the 2020 election.
The Elector’s Clause claim presented the court a much different scenario than the Equal Protection and Due Process claims Texas also raised. As the responding states stressed in their briefs, both the Equal Protection Clause and the Due Process Clause protect only “persons,” providing: “Nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Clearly, Texas is not a “person.”
While Texas argued it could represent its citizens and its electors’ rights under the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia provided some strong counter-arguments in their response briefs. A few sentences by the court on its reasoning would provide Americans concerned with the legitimacy of the election some assurance.
Texas’s Elector’s Clause claim, however, required more: It required the court to accept the complaint and address, in detail, the merits of Texas’s claim, because Texas was not merely challenging the manner of the other states’ elections.
Understanding the Elector’s Clause
The Elector’s Clause of the Constitution, in Article II, Section 1, Clause 2, provides that “[e]ach state shall appoint, in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors, equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress.”
In Bush v. Gore, in a three-justice concurrence, Justice William Rehnquist explained that this clause of the Constitution “convey[s] the broadest power of determination” and “leaves it to the legislature exclusively to define the method” of appointment of electors. Also, “a significant departure from the legislative scheme for appointing Presidential electors presents a federal constitutional question.”
Based on these principles in Bush v. Gore, the three-justice concurrence reasoned that because the Florida Supreme Court’s decision conflicted with the legislative mandate, it violated Article II. Texas’s bill of complaint tracked this reasoning, arguing that Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Georgia all departed from the election rules mandated by their respective legislative bodies and thus violated the Elector’s Clause.
Texas’s complaint and briefs then detailed the various extra-legislative modification or violations of the legislatively established election mandates. For example, Pennsylvania election officials violated the rules established by the state legislature in multiple ways, including by inspecting absentee ballots before election day then providing third-party identifying information for the voters, with those third parties then contacting the voters, whom election officials permitted to “cure” the ballots, even though curing was not authorized by the legislative body. Texas provided similar examples of extra-legislative changes to the election rules for Wisconsin, Michigan, and Georgia.
Standing Was a Pretense
Why was that not enough for the Supreme Court? What was lacking? The justices said standing—“a judicially cognizable interest”—but how can the state of Texas not have a judicially cognizable interest in her sister states living up to the compact they entered when they entered the Union?
Texas attempted in its briefs to crystalize the harm by stressing its interest in who serves as vice president, given the vice president’s tie-breaking status in the Senate and senators’ role as the representatives of the states. But a simpler and stronger argument came in a brief submitted by would-be amicus curiae Citizen’s United:
When one state allows the Manner in which Presidential Electors be chosen to be determined by anyone other than the state legislature, that state acts in breach of the presuppositions on which the Union is based. Each state is not isolated from the rest—rather, all states are interdependent. Our nation’s operational principle is E pluribus unum. Each state has a duty to other states to abide by this and other reciprocal obligations built into Constitution. While defendant states may view this suit as an infringement of its sovereignty, it is not, as the defendant states surrendered their sovereignty when they agreed to abide by Article II, § 1. Each state depends on other states to adhere to minimum constitutional standards in areas where it ceded its sovereignty to the union—and if those standards are not met, then the responsibility to enforce those standards falls to this Court.
On Friday, the Supreme Court voted not to enforce those standards.
Maybe there is a good reason. Maybe Rehnquist’s view was wrong. Maybe the court found the alleged violations not “significant” enough to reach the level of a constitutional violation. (How “significant” would a violation have to be?) Maybe the court viewed a violation of the compact on which our country was founded as beyond its purview.
There might be a satisfactory answer, but Americans have yet to hear it. And that was wrong, both for the court and the country.
– Fraction of the price of competitors (Athletic Greens = $80, Field of Greens = $70, Bulle Nutrition Green Zone = $40)
– All natural, non-GMO, no preservatives
– Great tasting, naturally sweetened with stevia (even kids will love it)
– Contains loads of anti-oxidants, greens blend, trace mineral complex, probiotics, enzymes
– Manufactured in the USA – Chocolate flavor available
Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world, which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom. The news also serves as a social connection tool, as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do. With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand, the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper.
– Justin
Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Send an email to corrections@stillnessinthestorm.com, with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at sitsshow@gmail.com. Thank you for reading.
Source:
https://thefederalist.com/2020/12/14/the-supreme-courts-rejection-of-texass-election-lawsuit-failed-the-constitution/


stillnessinthestorm--2020-12-14--HUGE – “We Have Serious, Serious Foreign Influence with Dominion Voting Machines” – General Flynn Sa

HUGE – “We Have Serious, Serious Foreign Influence with Dominion Voting Machines” – General Flynn Says “We Have Conclusive Evidence of Foreign Influence in US Election Right Now”

Related CONFIRMED : Dominion Voting Machines in Georgia were Remotely Controlled During Election… Foreign Interference Now a FACT This was an EXPLOSIVE INTERVIEW !
General Flynn tells Maria , “ We have serious , serious foreign influence with Dominion Voting Machines.
” General Flynn pointed everyone to visit Sidney Powell ’ s website DefendingtheRepublic.org for more information on this .
He added , “ We have conclusive evidence of foreign influence in US election right now.
” This was an incredible interview !
God bless General Flynn !
Body For Awareness Project : Your body , your clothes , your @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Hoft is the founder and editor of The Gateway Pundit , one of the top conservative news outlets in America .
Jim was awarded the Reed Irvine Accuracy in Media Award in 2013 and is the proud recipient of the Breitbart Award for Excellence in Online Journalism from the Americans for Prosperity Foundation in May 2016 .
Stillness in the Storm Editor : Why did we post this ?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world , which leads to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lead to life wisdom .
The news also serves as a social connection tool , as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do .
With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand , the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper .
Not sure how to make sense of this ?
Want to learn how to discern like a pro ?
Read this essential guide to discernment , analysis of claims , and understanding the truth in a world of deception @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools .
Stillness in the Storm Editor ’ s note : Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake ?
Send an email to corrections @ stillnessinthestorm.com , with the error and suggested correction , along with the headline and url .
Do you think this article needs an update ?
Or do you just have some feedback ?
Send us an email at sitsshow @ gmail.com .
Thank you for reading .

We need $2000 per month to pay our costs. Help us one time or recurring. (DONATE HERE)
To sign up for RSS updates, paste this link (https://stillnessinthestorm.com/feed/) into the search field of your preferred RSS Reader or Service (such as Feedly or gReader).
Subscribe to Stillness in the Storm Newsletter
“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.” – Aristotle
This website is supported by readers like you.
If you find our work of value, consider making a donation.
Stillness in the Storm DISCLAIMER: All articles, videos, statements, claims, views and opinions that appear anywhere on this site, whether stated as theories or absolute facts, are always presented by Stillness in the Storm as unverified—and should be personally fact checked and discerned by you, the reader. Any opinions or statements herein presented are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, or agreed to by Stillness, those who work with Stillness, or those who read Stillness. Any belief or conclusion gleaned from content on this site is solely the responsibility of you the reader to substantiate, fact check, and no harm comes to you or those around you. And any actions taken by those who read material on this site is solely the responsibility of the acting party. You are encouraged to think carefully and do your own research. Nothing on this site is meant to be believed without question or personal appraisal.
Content Disclaimer: All content on this site marked with “source – [enter website name and url]” is not owned by Stillness in the Storm. All content on this site that is not originally written, created, or posted as original, is owned by the original content creators, who retain exclusive jurisdiction of all intellectual property rights. Any copyrighted material on this site was shared in good faith, under fair use or creative commons. Any request to remove copyrighted material will be honored, provided proof of ownership is rendered. Send takedown requests to feedback@stillnessinthestorm.com.
What is our mission? Why do we post what we do?
Our mission here is to curate (share) articles and information that we feel is important for the evolution of consciousness. Most of that information is written or produced by other people and organizations, which means it does not represent our views or opinions as managing staff of Stillness in the Storm. Some of the content is written by one of our writers and is clearly marked accordingly. Just because we share a CNN story that speaks badly about the President doesn’t mean we’re promoting anti-POTUS views. We’re reporting on the fact as it was reported, and that this event is important for us to know so we can better contend with the challenges of gaining freedom and prosperity. Similarly, just because we share a pro/anti-[insert issue or topic] content, such as a pro-second amendment piece or an anti-military video doesn’t mean we endorse what is said. Again, information is shared on this site for the purpose of evolving consciousness. In our opinion, consciousness evolves through the process of accumulating knowledge of the truth and contemplating that knowledge to distill wisdom and improve life by discovering and incorporating holistic values. Thus, sharing information from many different sources, with many different perspectives is the best way to maximize evolution. What’s more, the mastery of mind and discernment doesn’t occur in a vacuum, it is much like the immune system, it needs regular exposure to new things to stay healthy and strong. If you have any questions as to our mission or methods please reach out to us at feedback@stillnessinthestorm.com.


stillnessinthestorm--2020-12-14--[WATCH] N.J. Gym Owner Fined $1 Million for Refusing to Close Has a Message for Gov. Phil Murphy

( Megan Fox ) Atlas Gym has been continuously harassed by the government of New Jersey for refusing to shut its doors or impose mask mandates on its clients .
Owner Ian Smith has made headlines for staying open despite orders from the state to close up shop .
Related Corey Goode : The HITCHHIKER ’ s GUIDE TO THE APOCALYPSE But now he ’ s back with a viral video message he made for Governor Phil Murphy .
I don ’ t think the state ’ s sanctions on him are working , do you ?
Filming in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government interference with his right to work and feed his family .
I wish every business owner in America was this courageous .
That ’ s all it would take to end the unfair targeting of small businesses while huge corporations are allowed to turn profits without fines .
Resist !
Body For Awareness Project : Your Body .
Your Clothes .
Your Truth .
On Sale Now .
Megan Fox is an award winning journalist and author of Believe Evidence ; the death of due process from Salome to # MeToo .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ that One Public Library Waged Against the First Amendment , about the harrowing lengths government bodies will take to silence public criticism .
@ MeganFoxWriter on Twitter Stillness in the Storm Editor : Why did we post this ?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world , which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom .
The news also serves as a social connection tool , as we tend to relate to those who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do .
With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand , the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper .
Not sure how to make sense of this ?
Want to learn how to discern like a pro ?
Read this essential guide to discernment , analysis of claims , and understanding the truth in a world of deception : 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools .
Stillness in the Storm Editor ’ s note : Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , with the error and suggested correction , along with the headline and url .
Do you think this article needs an update ?
Or do you just have some feedback ?
Send us an email at sitsshow @ gmail.com .
Thank you for reading .


stillnessinthestorm--2020-12-14--THIS IS HUGE: “It’s a Real Simple Fact to Prove that There Was Massive Fraud in This Election” – Inv

THIS IS HUGE: “It’s a Real Simple Fact to Prove that There Was Massive Fraud in This Election” – Inventor of QR Code Can Prove It

( Joe Hoft ) President Trump has the law and the US Constitution on his side .
Related Rudy Giuliani Asks What MI Sec .
of State Is Hiding ?
Why Did She Intervene “ in Antrim Mi Lawsuit in an [ Attempt ] to Prevent the Public from Exposing Voter and Election Fraud ?
” Back on November 6th , only three days after the election , retired Intel Operative Tony Shaffer , said not to worry , the President has the Constitution on his side and will win the election .
Shaffer had tweeted the day before , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be identified , and if so , they will prove that President Trump won the election .
Today we have astonishing support for Tony ’ s remarks .
IT Expert Jovan Hutton Pulitzer , the inventor of platform known as ‘ QR Code ‘ which is on about 12 billion devices around the globe , believes ballots can be scanned to determine validity .
When I started looking at ballots… I realized that everybody was speaking geek…It ’ s a real simple fact to prove that there was massive fraud in this election @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the image scan of the ballot in the machine , the CVR file in the machine , and I can even take a shredded bag of ballots and do what we do .
I want everybody to understand these physical ballots from the election , when they go into the machine , it basically makes a duplicate copy .
That ’ s your property as an American citizen .
We own it for 22 months after the election .
And so when these courts started saying , well you can ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was all technical smoke and mirrors , to fool judges , to fool lawyers , to say oh we can ’ t really do it .
So let me tell you how easy it is… Listen to it all below : Oh no , foreign bad actors were involved .
Joe Hoft is the twin brother of TGP ’ s founder , Jim Hoft .
His posts have been retweeted by President Trump and have made the headlines at the Drudge Report .
Joe worked as a corporate executive in Hong Kong and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which gives him a unique perspective of US and global current events .
He has ten degrees or designations and is the author of three books .
His new book : ‘ In God We Trust : Not in Lying Liberal Lunatics ’ is out now – please take a look and buy a copy .
Stillness in the Storm Editor : Why did we post this ?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world , which leads to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to life wisdom .
The news also serves as a social connection tool , as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do .
With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand , the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper .
Not sure how to make sense of this ?
Want to learn how to discern like a pro ?
Read this essential guide to discernment , analysis of claims , and understanding the truth in a world of deception : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Truth-Seeking Tools .
Stillness in the Storm Editor ’ s note : Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake ?
Send an email to corrections @ stillnessinthestorm.com , with the error and suggested correction , along with the headline and url .
Do you think this article needs an update ?
Or do you just have some feedback ?
Send us an email at sitsshow @ gmail.com .
Thank you for reading .

Spread the love
(Joe Hoft) President Trump has the law and the US Constitution on his side.
Related Rudy Giuliani Asks What MI Sec. of State Is Hiding? Why Did She Intervene “in Antrim Mi Lawsuit in an [Attempt] to Prevent the Public from Exposing Voter and Election Fraud?”
Source – Gateway Pundit
by Joe Hoft, December, 13th, 2020
Back on November 6th, only three days after the election, retired Intel Operative Tony Shaffer, said not to worry, the President has the Constitution on his side and will win the election.
Shaffer had tweeted the day before, that it was likely fraudulent ballots could be identified , and if so, they will prove that President Trump won the election.
Today we have astonishing support for Tony’s remarks.
(From the Donald.win website)
IT Expert Jovan Hutton Pulitzer, the inventor of platform known as ‘QR Code‘ which is on about 12 billion devices around the globe, believes ballots can be scanned to determine validity.
When I started looking at ballots… I realized that everybody was speaking geek…It’s a real simple fact to prove that there was massive fraud in this election. …We can take the physical ballot, the image scan of the ballot in the machine, the CVR file in the machine, and I can even take a shredded bag of ballots and do what we do. I want everybody to understand these physical ballots from the election, when they go into the machine, it basically makes a duplicate copy. That’s your property as an American citizen. We own it for 22 months after the election. And so when these courts started saying, well you can’t look at it, I realized it was all technical smoke and mirrors, to fool judges, to fool lawyers, to say oh we can’t really do it. So let me tell you how easy it is…
Listen to it all below:
Oh no, foreign bad actors were involved.
About The Author
Joe Hoft
Joe Hoft is the twin brother of TGP’s founder, Jim Hoft. His posts have been retweeted by President Trump and have made the headlines at the Drudge Report. Joe worked as a corporate executive in Hong Kong and traveled the world for his work, which gives him a unique perspective of US and global current events. He has ten degrees or designations and is the author of three books. His new book: ‘In God We Trust: Not in Lying Liberal Lunatics’ is out now – please take a look and buy a copy.
Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world, which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom. The news also serves as a social connection tool, as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do. With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand, the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper.
– Justin
Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake? Send an email to corrections@stillnessinthestorm.com, with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at sitsshow@gmail.com. Thank you for reading.
Source:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/huge-real-simple-fact-prove-massive-fraud-election-inventor-qr-code-can-prove/


stillnessinthestorm--2020-12-14--The Morning Briefing: Apocalypse Soon—Brush Up On Your Mandarin for the Biden Years

( Stephen Krusier ) You Can Spell Biden Without “ CCP ” but Why Would You ?
Happy Monday , dear Kruiser Morning Briefing friends .
Am I oozing enthusiasm for the start of a new week ?
Yes , yes I am .
The sobering reality of Joseph “ The Masked Groper ” Biden being sworn in as president of the United States next month is finally starting to hit me .
I ’ ve mostly been approaching the possibility like it ’ s a bad SNL skit that I ’ m being forced to watch with those A @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It was all a bit surreal but it ’ s just a bad dream , right ?
Apparently , this nonsense is actually going to happen now and , honestly , I don ’ t think even I can drink my way through this .
Sure , I ’ ll give it a try , but I have some things I need to accomplish next year and I can ’ t get any of them done if I am meandering through a Biden-avoidance alcoholic haze every day .
A central component to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who the power behind the throne will be .
At the beginning of the month , I wrote about the looming tug-of-war between DOCTOR OR SOMETHING Jill Biden and Miss Congeniality Kamala Harris for control of the empty space in Drooling Joe ’ s head .
That ’ s a battle that is definitely still on and might even be worth pay-per-view .
They ’ re only bit players in the Joe Biden ’ s puppeteer sweepstakes .
As my friend and colleague Stephen Green is fond of saying , Joe Biden is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Party .
There ’ s the real problem that I ’ ve been trying to keep buried in the back of my mind .
Of course , I ’ m not doing as good of a job burying reality as the mainstream media is , as Jeff wrote over the weekend : Hunter Biden was the October Surprise that wasn ’ t—a report so explosive , so potentially damaging , so dangerous for national security that it should have destroyed Joe Biden ’ s bid for the White House .
In any other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have been unleashed to verify the claims in the report .
Instead , in the ultimate expression of Trump Derangement Syndrome , a major media company set out to personally destroy the man they thought put the report together and thereby discredit the report to the point that the entire media complex in America took turns ridiculing the story instead of investigating it .
The results could have dire implications for national security .
But hey , at least they got rid of the Bad Orange Man .
The week before Election Day @ @ @ @ @ @ @ about Joe Biden and Hunter Biden , based on a 64-page report from researchers who combed public records to reveal how compromised the Biden family is to the Chinese Communist Party ( CCP ) .
You can read Part 1 here .
The four-part series lays out deeply disturbing connections between Hunter Biden , Joe Biden , John Kerry , and the CCP .
There are many ways to steal an election , and this massive dereliction of duty by the scum masquerading as journalists was a straight-up hijacking .
The tangled , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ right now has been kept in check during the Trump years .
The media ’ s October cover-up has now practically given the CCP a seat at Cabinet meetings .
The ChiCom hits just keep on coming too .
Stacey wrote a post yesterday about a recent leak that reveals that our Chinese commie friends are , well , everywhere : It ’ s like the Russian red scare of the twentieth century but with a corporate twist .
Comforting , no ?
It ’ s valid to wonder just how many of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cocaine covered fingers in and just how compromised Ol ’ Gropes is because of his ne ’ er-do-well son .
It would be super cool if the United States happened to be home to any journalists who had enough curiosity to ask questions about this potential nightmare scenario .
Sadly , those days have gone the way of the videocassette .
This is going to be ugly but you won ’ t hear that from anyone in the media .
Maybe we ’ ll get lucky and Rosetta Stone will have a year-end @ @ @ @ @ @ @ work practicing Mandarin so that we can understand what they ’ re saying to us in the camps .
Another One for the Media Memory Hole Body For Awareness Project : Your body .
Your clothes .
Your truth .
On Sale Now .
Stephen Kruiser is a professional stand-up comic , writer , and recovering political activist who edits and writes PJ ’ s Morning Briefing , aka The Greatest Political Newsletter in America .
His latest book Straight Outta Feelings is a humorous exploration of how the 2016 election made him @ @ @ @ @ @ @ before .
When not being a reclusive writer , Kruiser has had the honor of entertaining U.S. troops all over the world .
Stillness in the Storm Editor : Why did we post this ?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world , which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom .
The news also serves as a social connection tool , as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe @ @ @ @ @ @ @ power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand , the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper .
Not sure how to make sense of this ?
Want to learn how to discern like a pro ?
Read this essential guide to discernment , analysis of claims , and understanding the truth in a world of deception : 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools .
Stillness in the Storm Editor ’ s note : Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake ?
Send an email to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and suggested correction , along with the headline and url .
Do you think this article needs an update ?
Or do you just have some feedback ?
Send us an email at sitsshow @ gmail.com .
Thank you for reading .

Spread the love
(Stephen Krusier) You Can Spell Biden Without “CCP” but Why Would You?
Related Retail Apocalypse’ Continues: Forever 21 Files For Bankruptcy, 30,000 Jobs At Risk
Source – PJ Media
by Stephen Krusier, December 14th, 2020
Happy Monday, dear Kruiser Morning Briefing friends. Am I oozing enthusiasm for the start of a new week? Yes, yes I am.
The sobering reality of Joseph “The Masked Groper” Biden being sworn in as president of the United States next month is finally starting to hit me. I’ve mostly been approaching the possibility like it’s a bad SNL skit that I’m being forced to watch with those A Clockwork Orange thingies propping my eyelids open. It was all a bit surreal but it’s just a bad dream, right?
Apparently, this nonsense is actually going to happen now and, honestly, I don’t think even I can drink my way through this. Sure, I’ll give it a try, but I have some things I need to accomplish next year and I can’t get any of them done if I am meandering through a Biden-avoidance alcoholic haze every day.
A central component to my denial has involved my assessment about who the power behind the throne will be. At the beginning of the month, I wrote about the looming tug-of-war between DOCTOR OR SOMETHING Jill Biden and Miss Congeniality Kamala Harris for control of the empty space in Drooling Joe’s head. That’s a battle that is definitely still on and might even be worth pay-per-view.
They’re only bit players in the Joe Biden’s puppeteer sweepstakes. As my friend and colleague Stephen Green is fond of saying, Joe Biden is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Chinese Communist Party.
There’s the real problem that I’ve been trying to keep buried in the back of my mind.
Of course, I’m not doing as good of a job burying reality as the mainstream media is, as Jeff wrote over the weekend:
Hunter Biden was the October Surprise that wasn’t—a report so explosive, so potentially damaging, so dangerous for national security that it should have destroyed Joe Biden’s bid for the White House. In any other election, fleets of investigative reporters would have been unleashed to verify the claims in the report. Instead, in the ultimate expression of Trump Derangement Syndrome, a major media company set out to personally destroy the man they thought put the report together and thereby discredit the report to the point that the entire media complex in America took turns ridiculing the story instead of investigating it. The results could have dire implications for national security. But hey, at least they got rid of the Bad Orange Man. The week before Election Day, RedState published a series of articles about Joe Biden and Hunter Biden, based on a 64-page report from researchers who combed public records to reveal how compromised the Biden family is to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). You can read Part 1 here. The four-part series lays out deeply disturbing connections between Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, John Kerry, and the CCP.
There are many ways to steal an election, and this massive dereliction of duty by the scum masquerading as journalists was a straight-up hijacking.
The tangled, dysfunctional relationship that we have with China right now has been kept in check during the Trump years. The media’s October cover-up has now practically given the CCP a seat at Cabinet meetings.
The ChiCom hits just keep on coming too. Stacey wrote a post yesterday about a recent leak that reveals that our Chinese commie friends are, well, everywhere:
Sky News reported a list of nearly two million members of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) who are operating worldwide and in dozens of companies based in the United States and other Western nations. According to the report, the list was compiled in 2016 by Chinese dissidents who extracted the data from a Shanghai server
It’s like the Russian red scare of the twentieth century but with a corporate twist. Comforting, no?
It’s valid to wonder just how many of these companies Hunter Biden may have his cocaine covered fingers in and just how compromised Ol’ Gropes is because of his ne’er-do-well son. It would be super cool if the United States happened to be home to any journalists who had enough curiosity to ask questions about this potential nightmare scenario. Sadly, those days have gone the way of the videocassette.
This is going to be ugly but you won’t hear that from anyone in the media.
Maybe we’ll get lucky and Rosetta Stone will have a year-end sale and we can all get to work practicing Mandarin so that we can understand what they’re saying to us in the camps.
Another One for the Media Memory Hole
I'm so old I remember when every Democrat in America was saying President Trump was crazy for promising a vaccine by the end of the year. https://t.co/3dEj55CLkH — SFK (@stephenkruiser) December 14, 2020
Bee Me
Help At Last: House Relief Bill Will Provide Free 'Going Out Of Business' Signs To Small Business Owners https://t.co/mg1kELNtag — The Babylon Bee (@TheBabylonBee) December 12, 2020
The Kruiser Kabana
#RIP
– Essential fatty acid blend with fish oil, flax oil, borage oil, and CLA (conjugated linoleic acid)
– CLA promotes weight loss via fat cell breakdown (Seren Oils is a fish oil that helps with fat loss)
– EFA blend promotes brain health, proper inflammation response, skin/eye/joint health
– High quality encapsulation prevents fish burps
About The Author
Stephen Krusier
Stephen Kruiser is a professional stand-up comic, writer, and recovering political activist who edits and writes PJ’s Morning Briefing, aka The Greatest Political Newsletter in America. His latest book Straight Outta Feelings is a humorous exploration of how the 2016 election made him enjoy politics more than he ever had before. When not being a reclusive writer, Kruiser has had the honor of entertaining U.S. troops all over the world.
Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world, which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom. The news also serves as a social connection tool, as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do. With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand, the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper.
– Justin
Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake? Send an email to corrections@stillnessinthestorm.com, with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at sitsshow@gmail.com. Thank you for reading.
Source:
https://pjmedia.com/columns/stephen-kruiser/2020/12/14/the-morning-briefing-apocalypse-soon-brush-up-on-your-mandarin-for-the-biden-years-n1208835
Featured Image


stillnessinthestorm--2020-12-14--HUGE: President Trump Claims He Will ‘Declassify Everything’ Over Democrat ‘Lying’ And ‘Treason’

( Emily Zanotti ) President Donald Trump tweeted Saturday that he intends to “ declassify everything , ” over his own apparent concern that the Department of Justice and Attorney General William Barr withheld information about an ongoing DOJ investigation into Hunter Biden , the son of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden .
Related “ Bill Barr Should Have Stepped Up !
” – President Trump Goes Off on Bill Barr over His Silence on Hunter Biden ( VIDEO ) Hunter Biden acknowledged this week that he is under investigation over questions about his tax returns and possible unreported income @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Burisma .
As The Daily Wire noted late last week , further information seems to have emerged creating questions about Hunter Biden ’ s foreign dealings , including a possible entanglement in China .
“ In addition to Delaware , the securities fraud unit in the Southern District of New York also scrutinized Hunter Biden ’ s finances , according to the person with direct knowledge of the investigation , ” Politico reported .
“ The person said that , as of early last year , investigators in Delaware and Washington were also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s foreign ties.
” On Friday , The Wall Street Journal reported , tensions bubbled over in the White House , following news that Trump ’ s Attorney General William Barr knew of the investigation into Hunter Biden ’ s business dealings before the presidential election but did not make it public — a decision , the president felt , cost him support and may have cost him the election .
“ Mr .
Trump , in a meeting Friday , fumed about a Wall Street Journal report that Mr. Barr knew @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Biden before the election but worked to keep it from being publicly disclosed , a person familiar with the conversation said .
In the meeting , Mr. Trump contemplated firing Mr. Barr , people familiar with the conversation said , adding that it is not clear whether Mr. Trump intends to follow through , ” WSJ noted .
Saturday night , the president suggested that he may seek retribution against Hunter Biden — and possibly Barr — in a tweetstorm where he pledged to “ declassify everything.
” “ I have been doing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ president tweeted in response to a post from conservative analyst Todd Starnes , suggesting that , “ At this point @ realDonaldTrump should declassify everything .
Everything.
” “ IF Biden gets in , nothing will happen to Hunter or Joe , ” Trump fumed .
“ Barr will do nothing , and the new group of partisan killers coming in will quickly kill it all.
” “ Same thing with Durham .
We caught them cold , spying , treason & more ( the hard part ) , but ‘ Justice ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ !
” he said , referring to concerns that U.S. Attorney John Durham will not be able to conclude his investigation into whether the Obama administration kickstarted a probe into connections between the Trump 2016 presidential campaign and Russian officials as a form of political retribution before Joe Biden moves into the White House .
Although it ’ s not clear what Trump is planning to “ declassify , ” The Wall Street Journal reported Saturday that the president is considering several special counsel investigations : one into Hunter Biden ’ s business @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into claims of widespread vote fraud in the 2020 presidential election , and even a probe of Barr , himself , stemming from Barr ’ s comments last week that the DOJ does not suspect a national effort to upend the November elections .
If Trump appoints a special counsel , it will likely be a heavily limited investigation .
The Electoral College is expected to vote to make Joe Biden president on Monday , and Congress is expected to certify that vote the first week of January after it returns from its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Good They Have to be Mandatory Body For Awareness Project : Your body , your clothes , your truth .
On Sale Now .
Stillness in the Storm Editor : Why did we post this ?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world , which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom .
The news also serves as a social connection tool , as we tend to relate to those who know about and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand , the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper .
Not sure how to make sense of this ?
Want to learn how to discern like a pro ?
Read this essential guide to discernment , analysis of claims , and understanding the truth in a world of deception : 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools .
Stillness in the Storm Editor ’ s note : Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake ?
Send an email @ @ @ @ @ @ @ error and suggested correction , along with the headline and url .
Do you think this article needs an update ?
Or do you just have some feedback ?
Send us an email at sitsshow @ gmail.com .
Thank you for reading .

Spread the love
(Emily Zanotti) President Donald Trump tweeted Saturday that he intends to “declassify everything,” over his own apparent concern that the Department of Justice and Attorney General William Barr withheld information about an ongoing DOJ investigation into Hunter Biden, the son of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden.
Related “Bill Barr Should Have Stepped Up!” – President Trump Goes Off on Bill Barr over His Silence on Hunter Biden (VIDEO)
Source – Daily Wire
by Emily Zanotti, December 13th, 2020
Hunter Biden acknowledged this week that he is under investigation over questions about his tax returns and possible unreported income from Ukrainian oil and gas firm, Burisma. As The Daily Wire noted late last week, further information seems to have emerged creating questions about Hunter Biden’s foreign dealings, including a possible entanglement in China.
“In addition to Delaware, the securities fraud unit in the Southern District of New York also scrutinized Hunter Biden’s finances, according to the person with direct knowledge of the investigation,” Politico reported. “The person said that, as of early last year, investigators in Delaware and Washington were also probing potential money laundering and Hunter Biden’s foreign ties.”
On Friday, The Wall Street Journal reported, tensions bubbled over in the White House, following news that Trump’s Attorney General William Barr knew of the investigation into Hunter Biden’s business dealings before the presidential election but did not make it public — a decision, the president felt, cost him support and may have cost him the election.
“Mr. Trump, in a meeting Friday, fumed about a Wall Street Journal report that Mr. Barr knew of an existing federal investigation into Hunter Biden before the election but worked to keep it from being publicly disclosed, a person familiar with the conversation said. In the meeting, Mr. Trump contemplated firing Mr. Barr, people familiar with the conversation said, adding that it is not clear whether Mr. Trump intends to follow through,” WSJ noted.
Saturday night, the president suggested that he may seek retribution against Hunter Biden — and possibly Barr — in a tweetstorm where he pledged to “declassify everything.”
“I have been doing this. I agree!” the president tweeted in response to a post from conservative analyst Todd Starnes, suggesting that, “At this point @realDonaldTrump should declassify everything. Everything.”
“IF Biden gets in, nothing will happen to Hunter or Joe,” Trump fumed. “Barr will do nothing, and the new group of partisan killers coming in will quickly kill it all.”
“Same thing with Durham. We caught them cold, spying, treason & more (the hard part), but ‘Justice’ took too long. Will be DOA!” he said, referring to concerns that U.S. Attorney John Durham will not be able to conclude his investigation into whether the Obama administration kickstarted a probe into connections between the Trump 2016 presidential campaign and Russian officials as a form of political retribution before Joe Biden moves into the White House.
Although it’s not clear what Trump is planning to “declassify,” The Wall Street Journal reported Saturday that the president is considering several special counsel investigations: one into Hunter Biden’s business dealings and alleged tax issues, one into claims of widespread vote fraud in the 2020 presidential election, and even a probe of Barr, himself, stemming from Barr’s comments last week that the DOJ does not suspect a national effort to upend the November elections.
If Trump appoints a special counsel, it will likely be a heavily limited investigation. The Electoral College is expected to vote to make Joe Biden president on Monday, and Congress is expected to certify that vote the first week of January after it returns from its holiday recess.
– Essential fatty acid blend with fish oil, flax oil, borage oil, and CLA (conjugated linoleic acid)
– CLA promotes weight loss via fat cell breakdown (Seren Oils is a fish oil that helps with fat loss)
– EFA blend promotes brain health, proper inflammation response, skin/eye/joint health
– High quality encapsulation prevents fish burps
Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world, which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom. The news also serves as a social connection tool, as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do. With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand, the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper.
– Justin
Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Send an email to corrections@stillnessinthestorm.com, with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at sitsshow@gmail.com. Thank you for reading.
Source:
https://www.dailywire.com/news/president-trump-claims-he-will-declassify-everything-over-democrat-lying-and-treason


stillnessinthestorm--2020-12-14--Monkey Werx Overwatch SITREP 12.10.20 (Video)

This is a video post .
See the video below .
Related What Is Going On ?
!
Monkey Werx , Guantanamo Bay and Military Intelligence Stillness in the Storm Editor : Why did we post this ?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world , which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom .
The news also serves as a social connection tool , as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ truth-seeking mind in hand , the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper .
Not sure how to make sense of this ?
Want to learn how to discern like a pro ?
Read this essential guide to discernment , analysis of claims , and understanding the truth in a world of deception : 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools .
Stillness in the Storm Editor ’ s note : Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake ?
Send an email to corrections @ stillnessinthestorm.com , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ along with the headline and url .
Do you think this article needs an update ?
Or do you just have some feedback ?
Send us an email at sitsshow @ gmail.com .
Thank you for reading .
If you value our work here at Stillness in the Storm , please make a donation .
Without support from people like you , what you ’ re reading now wouldn ’ t be possible .


stillnessinthestorm--2020-12-15--Acceptance and Resignation Are Different Concepts

( Exploring Your Minds ) Acceptance and resignation may seem like similar concepts , but they aren ’ t .
Actually , their meanings have rather different connotations , and knowing what they are can help you know yourself better .
Some concepts have similar meanings and people often confuse them .
For example , this is the case with acceptance and resignation .
But why is it difficult to know if you ’ re talking about one or the other ?
Well , it ’ s because both represent an action or a process that implies a change of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and resigning are vital processes that influence the control you have over that which surrounds you .
Not only of the physical world but also of your ideas , expectations , and mental schemes .
In fact , both concepts usually alter what you determine to be in control of , what could be , and what ’ s beyond it .
Precisely how you carry this out differentiates acceptance from resignation .
Why is it important to differentiate between acceptance and resignation ?
Differentiating them isn ’ t only a didactic or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ ll be easier to identify your attitude or behavior towards a situation that invites you to change your perception of control if you ’ re familiar with both concepts .
The difference between acceptance and resignation is important in psychology .
Part of the therapeutic process involves an exercise in acceptance in many of the cases that come to your attention .
However , is it possible for patients to mistake acceptance for resignation ?
It is indeed , quite often .
In fact , explaining the differences between the two is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Given the importance of understanding these concepts , it ’ s best to delve deeper into what makes them different : Acceptance and resignation aren ’ t similar processes in terms of willpower .
Acceptance is a process you need to carry out unconsciously .
Moreover , therapeutic interventions promote an increase in the degree of awareness of a problem before working on acceptance .
In contrast , resignation isn ’ t sought in the therapeutic framework .
It occurs in a more unconscious way and produces discomfort .
Sometimes , life @ @ @ @ @ @ @ realizing it .
The role of the person in a process of acceptance and in a process of resignation is different .
You ’ re facing an active role in the first one , while the role is more passive in the second one .
That is , there ’ s a decision-making process to change that normally affects your emotional state when it comes to acceptance .
In the case of resignation , you usually place the responsibility for your change of perspective on circumstantial factors , meaning those external to you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ usually has a passive role in this change .
The intention behind resigning may have evolutionary logic , although it doesn ’ t lead you to reduce the pain you experience due to a given situation .
You mainly accept something to reduce your suffering .
Accepting your reality is achieved when you stop taking yourself too seriously .
That is to say , accepting doesn ’ t necessarily have to place you in a certain role .
As a victim , for example .
Moreover , not making judgments about your situation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ make this exercise so hard .
You probably tend to judge yourself harshly when you resign yourself .
This is because you focus on whether a fact is more or less fair or whether a change is more or less opportune , as well as many others .
The role of acceptance and resignation in your life Sports are a part of life and are often a reflection of it .
Through them , you experience life in contexts , such as defeat , loss , success , frustration , and euphoria .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ clarity the difference between acceptance and resignation in this representation of life .
Imagine that you practice a collective sport like soccer or basketball .
Now , imagine you ’ re in the middle of a game and due to the score and the time left it ’ ll be impossible to win .
Then , imagine there ’ s something important at stake ( a final game that will allow the team to qualify for a national championship or not , for example ) .
At this point , an exercise of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ continue playing with the same intensity and desire to score .
Mainly as a matter of dignity , sportsmanship , or respect for the team players , including yourself .
However , resigning yourself here will surely get a somewhat different result , such as playing without the same intensity and adopting an indifferent and carefree attitude .
Acceptance isn ’ t an easy exercise but life predisposes you to it .
A person with a chronic illness will have to face a process of vital acceptance and that process won ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , as a process , has its ups and downs .
It ’ s an interesting exercise to differentiate between acceptance and resignation because , just as with any other exercise , you get better and better with practice .
This type of learning is related to your feelings of happiness .
Stillness in the Storm Editor : Why did we post this ?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world , which leads to the development of more life @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The news also serves as a social connection tool , as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do .
With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand , the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper .
Not sure how to make sense of this ?
Want to learn how to discern like a pro ?
Read this essential guide to discernment , analysis of claims , and understanding the truth in a world of deception : 4 Key Steps of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the Storm Editor ’ s note : Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake ?
Send an email to corrections @ stillnessinthestorm.com , with the error and suggested correction , along with the headline and url .
Do you think this article needs an update ?
Or do you just have some feedback ?
Send us an email at sitsshow @ gmail.com .
Thank you for reading .

Spread the love
(Exploring Your Minds) Acceptance and resignation may seem like similar concepts, but they aren’t. Actually, their meanings have rather different connotations, and knowing what they are can help you know yourself better.
Related
Source – Exploring Your Minds
by Staff Writer, December 5th, 2020
Some concepts have similar meanings and people often confuse them. For example, this is the case with acceptance and resignation. But why is it difficult to know if you’re talking about one or the other?
Well, it’s because both represent an action or a process that implies a change of perspective regarding a concrete circumstance. Accepting and resigning are vital processes that influence the control you have over that which surrounds you. Not only of the physical world but also of your ideas, expectations, and mental schemes.
In fact, both concepts usually alter what you determine to be in control of, what could be, and what’s beyond it. Precisely how you carry this out differentiates acceptance from resignation.
“Acceptance doesn’t mean resignation; it means understanding that something is what it is and that there’s got to be a way through it.” -Michael J. Fox-
Why is it important to differentiate between acceptance and resignation?
Differentiating them isn’t only a didactic or semantic exercise. In fact, it’ll be easier to identify your attitude or behavior towards a situation that invites you to change your perception of control if you’re familiar with both concepts.
The difference between acceptance and resignation is important in psychology. Part of the therapeutic process involves an exercise in acceptance in many of the cases that come to your attention. However, is it possible for patients to mistake acceptance for resignation? It is indeed, quite often. In fact, explaining the differences between the two is usually necessary and a part of psychoeducation.
Differences between acceptance and resignation
Given the importance of understanding these concepts, it’s best to delve deeper into what makes them different:
Willpower
Acceptance and resignation aren’t similar processes in terms of willpower. Acceptance is a process you need to carry out unconsciously. Moreover, therapeutic interventions promote an increase in the degree of awareness of a problem before working on acceptance.
In contrast, resignation isn’t sought in the therapeutic framework. It occurs in a more unconscious way and produces discomfort. Sometimes, life circumstances make you give up without even realizing it.
Role
The role of the person in a process of acceptance and in a process of resignation is different. You’re facing an active role in the first one, while the role is more passive in the second one. That is, there’s a decision-making process to change that normally affects your emotional state when it comes to acceptance.
In the case of resignation, you usually place the responsibility for your change of perspective on circumstantial factors, meaning those external to you. Hence, the person who resigns usually has a passive role in this change.
Intention
The intention behind resigning may have evolutionary logic, although it doesn’t lead you to reduce the pain you experience due to a given situation. You mainly accept something to reduce your suffering.
Judgments
Accepting your reality is achieved when you stop taking yourself too seriously. That is to say, accepting doesn’t necessarily have to place you in a certain role. As a victim, for example. Moreover, not making judgments about your situation is usually one of the factors that make this exercise so hard.
You probably tend to judge yourself harshly when you resign yourself. This is because you focus on whether a fact is more or less fair or whether a change is more or less opportune, as well as many others.
The role of acceptance and resignation in your life
Sports are a part of life and are often a reflection of it. Through them, you experience life in contexts, such as defeat, loss, success, frustration, and euphoria. Perhaps, you can observe with more clarity the difference between acceptance and resignation in this representation of life.
Imagine that you practice a collective sport like soccer or basketball. Now, imagine you’re in the middle of a game and due to the score and the time left it’ll be impossible to win. Then, imagine there’s something important at stake (a final game that will allow the team to qualify for a national championship or not, for example).
At this point, an exercise of acceptance of the situation would be to continue playing with the same intensity and desire to score. Mainly as a matter of dignity, sportsmanship, or respect for the team players, including yourself.
However, resigning yourself here will surely get a somewhat different result, such as playing without the same intensity and adopting an indifferent and carefree attitude.
Final notes
Acceptance isn’t an easy exercise but life predisposes you to it. A person with a chronic illness will have to face a process of vital acceptance and that process won’t always be regular or stable. Acceptance, as a process, has its ups and downs.
It’s an interesting exercise to differentiate between acceptance and resignation because, just as with any other exercise, you get better and better with practice. This type of learning is related to your feelings of happiness.
Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?
The news is important to all people because it is where we come to know new things about the world, which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom. The news also serves as a social connection tool, as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do. With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand, the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper.
– Justin
Not sure how to make sense of this? Want to learn how to discern like a pro? Read this essential guide to discernment, analysis of claims, and understanding the truth in a world of deception: 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools.
Stillness in the Storm Editor’s note: Did you find a spelling error or grammatical mistake? Send an email to corrections@stillnessinthestorm.com, with the error and suggested correction, along with the headline and url. Do you think this article needs an update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at sitsshow@gmail.com. Thank you for reading.
Source:
https://exploringyourmind.com/acceptance-and-resignation-are-different-concepts/


stillnessinthestorm--2020-12-15--Wim Hof on Controlling the Vagus Nerve (Video)

This is a video post .
See the video below .
Third Eye ( Healing Tonic ) : Pineal Gland Decalcifier , Powerful Nootropic , Supports Pineal Function , Melatonin Regulation , Dream Activation , ( Handcrafted in small batches ) the perfect blend of mushrooms and herbs made from scratch !
Use Promo Code SITS20 for 20 % discount on this and other products in your order .
Third Eye , on Sale NOW !
Stillness in the Storm Editor : Why did we post this ?
The news is important to all people because it is where we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ world , which leads to the development of more life goals that lead to life wisdom .
The news also serves as a social connection tool , as we tend to relate to those who know about and believe the things we do .
With the power of an open truth-seeking mind in hand , the individual can grow wise and the collective can prosper .
Not sure how to make sense of this ?
Want to learn how to discern like a pro ?
Read this essential guide to discernment , analysis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in a world of deception : 4 Key Steps of Discernment – Advanced Truth-Seeking Tools .
Stillness in the Storm Editor ’ s note : Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake ?
Send an email to corrections @ stillnessinthestorm.com , with the error and suggested correction , along with the headline and url .
Do you think this article needs an update ?
Or do you just have some feedback ?
Send us an email at sitsshow @ gmail.com .
Thank you for reading .