thevaccinereaction--2020-01-17--2020: Both Sides All In, As Vaccine Legislation Revs Up

There were a record 221 vaccine-related pieces of legislation introduced across 40 states ( plus Washington , DC ) in 2019 .
Some battles were won , some were lost , while other battles loom in the near future .
2020 is likely to be a crucial year in the U.S. for medical choice , parental consent , religious freedom , open debate , and Constitutionally-guaranteed free speech .
Will freedom be protected ?
Or , will America descend further down the dark path of mandating medical products with , at best , questionable safety profiles—dictated by government bureaucrats ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ state government in 2019 .
The prevailing trend saw attempts by state governments to all but eliminate medical exemptions for vaccinations , absent very narrow criteria .
California set a precedent with SB 276 in 2019 , rammed through amidst massive protests , to investigate doctors in the state for writing more than a handful of vaccine exemptions .
Bills were proposed that would allow minor children to be vaccinated without the knowledge or prior informed consent from the parents .
On the surveillance front , some Americans witnessed forced inclusion and reporting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ systems .
Finally , there was an expansion to authorize other professions such as dentists , podiatrists , pharmacists , and optometrists , to give shots .
Not all of the more than 200 bills concerning vaccinations were oppositional—77 of the bills filed in 2019 expanded individual liberty , choice , and autonomy up from only 47 in 2018 .
Straight out the gate in 2020 , New Jersey will hit the ground running as it doubles down on the religious rights-canceling bill it was forced to abandon in late 2019 .
Headlines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ parents protested inside and outside the New Jersey State Capitol for over ten hours in winter conditions to postpone the vote on S2173 .
New Jersey ’ s controversial bill , S2173/A3818 , aims to put an end to a rule that allowed more than 14,000 state students to forgo vaccination because of their family ’ s religious beliefs .
It was similar to recent bills passed in California and New York State .
Starting tomorrow [ Monday ] , a week of protests are planned at the state capitol with the bill @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vote either January 9th or the 13th .
Some are claiming , however , it could be rushed through on the 6th .
On Monday , New Jersey is also contending with a bill in the Assembly Appropriations Committee3 that would establish mandatory mental health screenings for depression and anxiety disorders for public school students grades 7-12 without the ability for a parent to decline .
This slew of mandatory vaccine bills and mental health screening directives would transform New Jersey schools into marketing hubs , funneling ‘ student customers ’ towards pharmaceutical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ study found4 the rate of autism spectrum disorder ( ASD ) in four-year-old children in New Jersey rose by 43 percent from 2010 to 2014 , to an estimated rate of 1 in 35 children—the highest of any state in the United States .
Virginia , Washington D.C. and Massachusetts have active bills that will allow minors to consent to vaccines .
The bills are all very similar , allowing minors of any age ( or no specified age ) to consent to vaccination .
Since the minor is considered an adult in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ denied access to information about their child ’ s vaccine status .
Virginia ’ s bill , for example , states , “ minor shall also be deemed an adult for the purpose of accessing or authorizing the disclosure of medical records.
” Massachusetts H4096/S2359 is an example of the escalating trend towards “ bill-bundling.
” in which several points ( historically floated as single bills ) , are combined into one “ Frankenbill.
” The twin Massachusetts bills seek a government takeover of medical and religious belief exemptions , along with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ publishing of vaccination and exemptions rates to programs and health departments would also be compulsory .
For those who oppose ever-increasing vaccine schedules mandated by government bureaucrats , 2020 will see the introduction of state bills which provide hope .
For example , Pennsylvania ’ s HB286 ‘ s ‘ Informed Consent Protection Act ’ seeks to do four things : • Deny health care practitioners and facilities the ability to refuse to treat a child solely because the parent has chosen to delay or decline one or more of the CDC recommended @ @ @ @ @ @ @ parent to sign a self-incriminating form to receive medical care • A health care practitioner may not accept a financial incentive from an insurance or pharmaceutical company for vaccinating patients or for maintaining a certain rate of vaccinated patients within his or her medical practice Legislation in Arizona seeks to establish parental choice on vaccines and make any future federal mandates more difficult .
The Tenth Amendment Center5 writes : The bill would additionally eliminate a requirement that children be vaccinated in accordance with the recommended schedule in order for their parents to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their behalf .
It is interesting to note how some states are ramping up their vaccination legislation just as new studies suggest trending in the opposite direction would be wiser .
Recently published scientific studies suggest the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ’ s ( CDC ) recommended vaccine schedule may be dangerous for some individuals .
Looking only at the burden of injected aluminum , a new paper6 published in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology concluded CDC ’ s vaccine schedule was 15.9 times over the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ adjusted for body weight .
Study researchers also estimated that a child who followed the vaccine schedule would be in a state of “ chronic toxicity ” for 70 % of the child ’ s first seven months of life ( 149 days , from birth to seven months ) .
Many eyes are on Maine in 2020 , as their citizens ’ veto petition7 has instigated a special ballot , making it the first state to put government vaccine mandates to a popular vote .
In the summer of 2019 , Maine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ removed religious , philosophical , and personal belief vaccine exemptions in one felled swoop , among other directives .
Grassroots opponents were able to quickly gather over 95,000 signatures from registered voters in the state , leading to a vote on March 3rd .
So far , corporate media has smothered any open discussion on the topic of vaccine safety , while simultaneously claiming there is no debate .
Big Tech and social media giants have waded deep into authoritarian censorship of speech , ideas , and debate over vaccinations .
Despite all @ @ @ @ @ @ @ counter- prevailing bills continually being introduced across America , protecting against mandatory medical products with questionable at best safety profiles—yet another concrete example that the science isn ’ t settled and the debate isn ’ t over .
In America , the individual and the family unit remains as sacrosanct today as when the framers drafted our nation ’ s founding documents .
And even as vaccines continue to adhere to an unscientific one-size-fits-all approach , many in government , science , and medicine have been roused from their Big Pharma/Corporate Media slumber @ @ @ @ @ @ @ open debate over vaccine safety will continue in 2020–only louder and in greater numbers than ever before .
This article was reprinted with the author ’ s permission .
It was originally published at JeffereyJaxen.com .
Jefferey Jaxen is an independant journalist , writer , and researcher .