healthimpactnews--2020-10-11--Washington Mother Represents Herself in Court and Beats CPS – Judge Orders Baby Returned Home

A Washington couple , 22-year-old Sophia Rosas and her fiancé , 23-year-old Sean Kilkenny , of Bremerton , have been fighting tooth and nail for the last month to bring home their two young children .
The month of September ended quite differently than it began for the young couple , with relief and tears of joy instead of grief and sorrow , as Sophia and Sean ’ s youngest son Riley was returned home for the second time , despite CPS objection .
See our previous stories about this family : Washington Couple Harassed Over Medical Marijuana Use – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Judge Orders Terrorized Toddler Medically Kidnapped from Parents over Medical Marijuana Use Returned to Family ’ s Custody Washington Mom Fights to Get Son Back Who Was Wrongfully Taken Away Due to Her Medical Cannabis Treatment On September 30th , 2020 , Sophia and Sean attended a Status Hearing in Kitsap County , Washington , regarding the out-of-home placement of their son , Riley .
Sophia ’ s oldest son , Zurius , whose biological father is no longer involved in the case , was also discussed at this hearing .
Commissioner Matthew @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2:30pm PST .
As with the previous hearing on Sept 23rd , numerous members of the public called in to witness the hearing but were immediately denied access .
However , almost half an hour into the hearing , the awaiting audience was suddenly allowed into the Zoom video and telephone conference .
Apparently the beginning of the hearing had started with Sophia ’ s motion to reopen the court to the public , and her motion was granted .
As Commissioner Clucas added all of the audience that was waiting in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were 28 people in attendance online via Zoom .
Also in attendance through Zoom was AAG Rachel Strayhorn , SW Desiree Hovland , SW Supervisor Lillian , GAL Jennifer Martin , Attorney ( for Z ’ s biodad ) Nathan Collins , and many more , identified as court support and observers , including Health Impact News staff , that called in to witness the hearing .
In attendance in the courtroom with Commissioner Clucas and his clerk Mea , were Sophia and Sean , as well Leyna Harris ( Sean ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s mother ) , Aysha Mitchell ( Sophia ’ s mother ) , and Monica Holm ( Sean ’ s Aunt and placement for Riley ) .
Most importantly , Baby Riley was also in the courtroom , allegedly at the request of the Commissioner , and could be seen babbling and fussing in the background .
There was much discussion about a family team decision meeting that had occured the Friday before , where Sophia had refused to agree to any continued services without court discussion if her son was not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Department continued their relentless requests for unnecessary chemical dependency treatment and questioned the legitimacy of Sophia and Sean ’ s medical marijuana use .
After hearing from all parties , and to the joy of the family and onlookers , Commissioner Clucas ordered that Riley be returned home immediately to his parents – that day !
He also put forth his order with the specific instruction that Riley could not be removed again without another hearing or imminent danger and extingent circumstance that would allow any child to be removed without a hearing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Riley ’ s return , the Commissioner ordered that both Sean and Sophia participate in chemical dependency assessments ( with their medical recommendations provided as collateral information ) and continued UA ’ s by request of the Department .
He also mentioned that he understood Sophia was challenging the need for the chemical dependency service in her motions that still had yet to be heard , and that this requirement could change pending the outcome of those motions .
Commissioner Clucas ordered that Sean and Sophia allow the Department access to their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but also stated that “ the parents have the right to record the visits .
It is their home.
” However , Commissioner Clucas also denied Sophia ’ s motion to discharge the public defender ’ s office as her legal representation .
He stated that he could not allow Sophia to represent herself , on the basis that there was a pending termination of parental rights for Zurius .
The Commissioner told her that if he allowed her to proceed without an attorney , and she lost her son , that it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ her in the eye if he ever ran into her at the grocery store – when he was the one who let her go forward without an attorney .
Assistant Attorney General , Rachel Strayhorn , interjected that Sophia had a right to object to the denial of her motion to represent herself if she still wanted to continue pro se .
Commissioner Clucas told the AAG that “ obviously Sophia knows how to revise his order ” and “ could do so if she wanted to , or even bring it up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ could be seen smiling and nodding in agreement .
Then he took up the issue of the remainder of Sophia ’ s motions , including her motion to dismiss the termination of parental rights petition previously filed by Washington State .
The Commissioner suggested that the motions be determined through a settlement conference , with Judge Jeffrey Bassett mediating the discussions .
He spoke about what he felt were the benefits of this kind of conference , including coming to a compromise on the motions without a hearing .
Sophia and the other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ come to an agreement , so a conference was scheduled for October 16th , 2020 , and will include all parties in the cases for both Riley and Zurius .
Commissioner Clucas also scheduled a review hearing for October 21st , which will of course be open to the public , to review the status of the cases and determine the next steps .
Commissioner Clucas stated that if the public wants to join , it is best to call or log in before the 2:30pm PST start time so that they can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an amazing job representing herself at the hearing , despite not being allowed to continue pro se .
During the hearing , Commissioner Clucas mentioned seeing Sophia at the courthouse filing documents and commended Sophia for her efforts in her case , saying she had “ done an excellent job so far.
” He also said , “ I wish that you could move on with your education , go to law school and sit here and represent parents ” and then even told her “ when this case is all over with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ways you can work in this system.
” Riley returned home the night of September 30th to a very happy Sophia and Sean .
The family documented the joyous reunion through her facebook account , with many additional photos and videos following over the next few days .
Sophia says “ having Riley home is a huge relief and gives us all a lot of faith that Zurius will be returning home soon as well.
” Another blessing that resulted from the court order was Sophia ’ s mother , Aysha , has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” – something the family had been working on since the beginning of the cases .
The Department did their required “ return home walkthrough ” on October 5th , 2020 , which was broadcast live through the family support page .
Although , one thing is very noticeable about the recording… the camera never shows the social workers .
Prior to the walkthrough , Sophia had a visit with Zurius .
She says , Sophia says that while at that visit , she had a good conversation with Desiree Hovland , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ told that they don ’ t mind being recorded , they just don ’ t want to be physically recorded .
Sophia said she agreed and expressed how she needs them to work with her if they expect her to work with them .
Sophia says that Desiree has definitely been different since court and much more open to understanding Sophia ’ s situation than her previous social workers .
She reports that even when she was unable to attend a visitation with Zurius recently , Desiree allowed her to send a video @ @ @ @ @ @ @ did not have to miss her that day – something that never happened before .
After connecting with her new public defender , Andrew Makar , Sophia says she feels good about the upcoming settlement conference .
Her only goal is to get Zurius home too , so that they can all move on with their lives , and is definitely willing to compromise to make that happen .
With the department still pursuing the chemical dependency angle and forcing the parents to complete unnecessary services paid for by the Washington tax payers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ comply despite the continued invasion of medical privacy and unnecessary urinary analysis .
Already , both Sean and Sophia have been asked by DCYF to complete 2 UA ’ s each , on 4 separate days , in the last week and a half , with the first occurring immediately the day after court – October 1st .
Sophia says of course they will all be positive for THC because of their use of Medical Marijuana for their chronic health conditions .
Despite that it takes quite a bit of time and money @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from Riley , to comply with these unending requests , Sophia hopes by compromising with the social workers it will allow for them to all work together to return Z home as well .
She is nervous about the upcoming Settlement Conference , but excited to find out where a few compromises might lead in reunifying her family .
In the meantime , a new campaign has been created to demand Washington DCYF Send Zurius Home .
HOW YOU CAN HELP !
Comment on this article at MedicalKidnap.com .
Having problems receiving our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed Medical Kidnapping : A Threat to Every Family in America T-Shirt See : Medical Kidnapping : A Threat to Every Family in America Today Help spread the awareness of Medical Kidnapping by wearing the Medical Kidnapping t-shirt !
Support the cause of MedicalKidnap.com , which is part of the Health Impact News network .
Support the cause against Medical Kidnapping by purchasing our new book !
If you know people who are skeptical and can not believe that medical kidnapping happens in the U.S. today , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Backed with solid references and real life examples , they will not be able to deny the plain evidence before them , and will become better educated on this topic that is destroying the American family .
2 Books Retail : $ 49.98 ( for 2 books ) FREE Shipping Available !
Now : $ 19.99 ( for 2 books ) Order here !

by Health Impact News / MedicalKidnap.com Staff
A Washington couple, 22-year-old Sophia Rosas and her fiancé, 23-year-old Sean Kilkenny, of Bremerton, have been fighting tooth and nail for the last month to bring home their two young children.
The month of September ended quite differently than it began for the young couple, with relief and tears of joy instead of grief and sorrow, as Sophia and Sean’s youngest son Riley was returned home for the second time, despite CPS objection.
See our previous stories about this family:
On September 30th, 2020, Sophia and Sean attended a Status Hearing in Kitsap County, Washington, regarding the out-of-home placement of their son, Riley. Sophia’s oldest son, Zurius, whose biological father is no longer involved in the case, was also discussed at this hearing. Commissioner Matthew Clucas presided.
The hearing began at 2:30pm PST. As with the previous hearing on Sept 23rd, numerous members of the public called in to witness the hearing but were immediately denied access.
However, almost half an hour into the hearing, the awaiting audience was suddenly allowed into the Zoom video and telephone conference. Apparently the beginning of the hearing had started with Sophia’s motion to reopen the court to the public, and her motion was granted.
As Commissioner Clucas added all of the audience that was waiting in the virtual “lobby” he mentioned there were 28 people in attendance online via Zoom.
Also in attendance through Zoom was AAG Rachel Strayhorn, SW Desiree Hovland, SW Supervisor Lillian, GAL Jennifer Martin, Attorney (for Z’s biodad) Nathan Collins, and many more, identified as court support and observers, including Health Impact News staff, that called in to witness the hearing.
In attendance in the courtroom with Commissioner Clucas and his clerk Mea, were Sophia and Sean, as well Leyna Harris (Sean’s attorney), Jennifer Kilkenny (Sean’s mother), Aysha Mitchell (Sophia’s mother), and Monica Holm (Sean’s Aunt and placement for Riley).
Most importantly, Baby Riley was also in the courtroom, allegedly at the request of the Commissioner, and could be seen babbling and fussing in the background.
There was much discussion about a family team decision meeting that had occured the Friday before, where Sophia had refused to agree to any continued services without court discussion if her son was not going to be immediately returned.
The Department continued their relentless requests for unnecessary chemical dependency treatment and questioned the legitimacy of Sophia and Sean’s medical marijuana use.
After hearing from all parties, and to the joy of the family and onlookers, Commissioner Clucas ordered that Riley be returned home immediately to his parents – that day!
He also put forth his order with the specific instruction that Riley could not be removed again without another hearing or imminent danger and exigent circumstance that would allow any child to be removed without a hearing according to Washington law.
As part of Riley’s return, the Commissioner ordered that both Sean and Sophia participate in chemical dependency assessments (with their medical recommendations provided as collateral information) and continued UA’s by request of the Department. He also mentioned that he understood Sophia was challenging the need for the chemical dependency service in her motions that still had yet to be heard, and that this requirement could change pending the outcome of those motions.
Commissioner Clucas ordered that Sean and Sophia allow the Department access to their home and to Riley upon request, but also stated that “the parents have the right to record the visits. It is their home.”
However, Commissioner Clucas also denied Sophia’s motion to discharge the public defender’s office as her legal representation. He stated that he could not allow Sophia to represent herself, on the basis that there was a pending termination of parental rights for Zurius.
The Commissioner told her that if he allowed her to proceed without an attorney, and she lost her son, that it would be hard for him to look her in the eye if he ever ran into her at the grocery store – when he was the one who let her go forward without an attorney.
Assistant Attorney General, Rachel Strayhorn, interjected that Sophia had a right to object to the denial of her motion to represent herself if she still wanted to continue pro se. Commissioner Clucas told the AAG that “obviously Sophia knows how to revise his order” and “could do so if she wanted to, or even bring it up again at a later date.”
Sophia could be seen smiling and nodding in agreement.
Commissioner Clucas assigned attorney Andrew J. Makar as Sophia’s new public defender.
Then he took up the issue of the remainder of Sophia’s motions, including her motion to dismiss the termination of parental rights petition previously filed by Washington State.
The Commissioner suggested that the motions be determined through a settlement conference, with Judge Jeffrey Bassett mediating the discussions. He spoke about what he felt were the benefits of this kind of conference, including coming to a compromise on the motions without a hearing.
Sophia and the other parties all said they would try to come to an agreement, so a conference was scheduled for October 16th, 2020, and will include all parties in the cases for both Riley and Zurius. Commissioner Clucas also scheduled a review hearing for October 21st, which will of course be open to the public, to review the status of the cases and determine the next steps.
Commissioner Clucas stated that if the public wants to join, it is best to call or log in before the 2:30pm PST start time so that they can be added in advance.
Sophia did an amazing job representing herself at the hearing, despite not being allowed to continue pro se. During the hearing, Commissioner Clucas mentioned seeing Sophia at the courthouse filing documents and commended Sophia for her efforts in her case, saying she had “done an excellent job so far.”
He also said, “I wish that you could move on with your education, go to law school and sit here and represent parents” and then even told her “when this case is all over with, come talk to me about other ways you can work in this system.”
Riley returned home the night of September 30th to a very happy Sophia and Sean. The family documented the joyous reunion through her facebook account, with many additional photos and videos following over the next few days.
Sophia says “having Riley home is a huge relief and gives us all a lot of faith that Zurius will be returning home soon as well.”
Another blessing that resulted from the court order was Sophia’s mother, Aysha, has been officially declared an “approved caregiver” – something the family had been working on since the beginning of the cases.
The Department did their required “return home walkthrough” on October 5th, 2020, which was broadcast live through the family support page. Although, one thing is very noticeable about the recording… the camera never shows the social workers.
Prior to the walkthrough, Sophia had a visit with Zurius. She says,
“Zurius and I had such a great time. He ran up to me and said, ‘I love you so much Mommy and you make me happy. I pray for you everyday.’ We had so much fun painting and playing legos.”
Sophia says that while at that visit, she had a good conversation with Desiree Hovland, the new social worker. She was allegedly told that they don’t mind being recorded, they just don’t want to be physically recorded. Sophia said she agreed and expressed how she needs them to work with her if they expect her to work with them.
She says,
“I told her from a mother’s point of view why I am having such a hard time. I explained to them that even though there was a founded abuse allegation, IT DID NOT HAPPEN. I love my kids more than life itself and Desiree kept referring to how important it is for children to be with their biological parents.”
Sophia says that Desiree has definitely been different since court and much more open to understanding Sophia’s situation than her previous social workers. She reports that even when she was unable to attend a visitation with Zurius recently, Desiree allowed her to send a video to her son, so that he did not have to miss her that day – something that never happened before.
After connecting with her new public defender, Andrew Makar, Sophia says she feels good about the upcoming settlement conference. Her only goal is to get Zurius home too, so that they can all move on with their lives, and is definitely willing to compromise to make that happen.
With the department still pursuing the chemical dependency angle and forcing the parents to complete unnecessary services paid for by the Washington tax payers, Sophia says she is willing to comply despite the continued invasion of medical privacy and unnecessary urinary analysis.
Already, both Sean and Sophia have been asked by DCYF to complete 2 UA’s each, on 4 separate days, in the last week and a half, with the first occurring immediately the day after court – October 1st.
Sophia says of course they will all be positive for THC because of their use of Medical Marijuana for their chronic health conditions.
Despite that it takes quite a bit of time and money from the parents, and attention away from Riley, to comply with these unending requests, Sophia hopes by compromising with the social workers it will allow for them to all work together to return Z home as well.
She says,
“I’m still going to be hesitant but I made it clear that as long as they work with me, I am willing to work with them. It’s all about meeting halfway, just like coming to the agreement about no visual recordings of them.”
She is nervous about the upcoming Settlement Conference, but excited to find out where a few compromises might lead in reunifying her family.
In the meantime, a new campaign has been created to demand Washington DCYF Send Zurius Home.
Family advocate, Serra Frank, says,
“What began as a broken arm, allegedly caused by an accident and never truly investigated, has turned into 2 years of unnecessary services and ever-changing demands from the Washington Department of Family, Youth and Children; with the main concern still being his mother’s continued medical marijuana use in legal Washington State. But the court has made it clear that Medical Marijuana use is not enough to keep the children out of the home because Riley was returned home last month despite their medical use. If the home is safe for one child, it is safe for both children. It is time for Washington DCYF to send Zurius home, too!”
HOW YOU CAN HELP!
New petition to send Zurius home – https://www.change.org/p/washington-dcyf-send-zurius-home
Additional petition – www.change.org/fight4zandriley
Next Court Hearing – Court Support Facebook Event Page – https://www.facebook.com/events/2440921349546500
Family Support Page – www.facebook.com/fight4zandriley
Family Donation Account – www.fundrazr.com/fight4zandriley
#Fight4ZandRiley
Contact Everyone:
Washington Leaders:
☎✉ Washington Governor Jay Inslee: https://www.governor.wa.gov
Office of the Governor
PO Box 40002
Olympia, WA 98504-0002
Phone: 360-902-4111
☎✉ Bremerton Mayor Greg Wheeler
345 6th Street Suite 600
Bremerton, WA 98337
Phone: 360-473-5266
Washington Legislators:
☎✉ Representative Dan Griffey: https://app.leg.wa.gov/pbc/memberEmail/35/1
PO Box 40600
Olympia, WA 98504
(360) 786 – 7966
☎✉ Senator Tim Sheldon: https://app.leg.wa.gov/pbc/memberEmail/35/0
PO Box 40435
Olympia, WA 98504
(360) 786 – 7668
Fax: (360) 786 – 1999
✉ Senator Patty Murray: https://www.murray.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/mobile/contactme
✉ Senator Maria Cantwell: https://www.cantwell.senate.gov/contact
✉ Representative Derek Kilmer: https://kilmer.house.gov/contact/email-me
Comment on this article at MedicalKidnap.com.
See Also:
Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through
Medical Kidnapping: A Threat to Every Family in America T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton!
Order here!
Medical Kidnapping is REAL!
See: Medical Kidnapping: A Threat to Every Family in America Today
Help spread the awareness of Medical Kidnapping by wearing the Medical Kidnapping t-shirt!
Support the cause of MedicalKidnap.com, which is part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!
Support the cause against Medical Kidnapping by purchasing our new book!
If you know people who are skeptical and cannot believe that medical kidnapping happens in the U.S. today, this is the book for them! Backed with solid references and real life examples, they will not be able to deny the plain evidence before them, and will become better educated on this topic that is destroying the American family.
1 Book – 228 pages
Retail: $24.99
FREE Shipping Available!
Now: $14.99
Order here!
2 Books
Retail: $49.98 (for 2 books)
FREE Shipping Available!
Now: $19.99 (for 2 books)
Order here!


healthimpactnews--2020-10-11--California Medical Doctor Cures Over 1700 Patients with COVID Using Hydroxychloroquine

Doctors on the “ front lines ” treating COVID patients continue to try and speak out regarding the fact that there is a 100 % cure rate for COVID by using hydroxychloroquine .
Dr. Brian Tyson from Southern California is one of the latest doctors to grant an interview talking about his experience in treating over 1700 COVID patients using hydroxychloroquine .
None of his patients have died , and only one had to be admitted to the hospital .
This continues to be the biggest scandal of the COVID plandemic , and perhaps the largest scandal in medical history @ @ @ @ @ @ @ needlessly based on a positive COVID test and fear , as this information is censored in the corporate media as well as Big Tech social media platforms .
Even President Trump , who originally promoted hydroxychloroquine and allegedly was taking it himself , has now turned his back on the Front Line doctors who continue to successfully use hydroxychloroquine .
With his own alleged COVID diagnosis last week , President Trump instead chose to use and promote two new drugs that are being fast-tracked and are without a history of successful treatment yet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Doctors on the “front lines” treating COVID patients continue to try and speak out regarding the fact that there is a 100% cure rate for COVID by using hydroxychloroquine.
Dr. Brian Tyson from Southern California is one of the latest doctors to grant an interview talking about his experience in treating over 1700 COVID patients using hydroxychloroquine. None of his patients have died, and only one had to be admitted to the hospital.
This continues to be the biggest scandal of the COVID plandemic, and perhaps the largest scandal in medical history, where so many people are dying needlessly based on a positive COVID test and fear, as this information is censored in the corporate media as well as Big Tech social media platforms.
Even President Trump, who originally promoted hydroxychloroquine and allegedly was taking it himself, has now turned his back on the Front Line doctors who continue to successfully use hydroxychloroquine.
With his own alleged COVID diagnosis last week, President Trump instead chose to use and promote two new drugs that are being fast-tracked and are without a history of successful treatment yet.
Watch the interview on OAN:
More on the COVID Hydroxychloroquine Scandal
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-10-12--Another “Conservative Judge” from the Swamp Nominated to the Supreme Court

Chuck Baldwin has written a very good critique of Supreme Court Justice nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett , while at the same time showing that “ conservatives ” have dominated the Court since the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision , and have never been able to over-turn it .
Besides the issues highlighted in this article , it is reported that Judge Barrett and her husband have adopted children from Haiti .
This is a huge red flag , as Haiti is a known center for child trafficking and illegal adoptions .
Larry Romanoff , in his expose on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ On this note , I would add my strong suspicions that the most horrid experiments , those that have not yet come to light , were outsourced to Haiti and Puerto Rico .
It is not a secret that the US has for decades used Haiti as a private biological laboratory and , since that small nation has been under the absolute control of the US and under an absolute media embargo , the US military and the CIA have been able to conduct operations there without reservation or inhibition .
Haiti is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rings operated formerly for CIA experimentation and subsequently for purposes similar to those of Jeffrey Epstein – personal enjoyment and entrapment of politicians .
An Italian social agency recently traced 640 of 1,000 pedophilia websites to a Haiti location , these websites offering not only live videos of the sexual abuse ( some of it horrific ) of children as young as 0 to 2 years of age , but also of the torture of these children as well as snuff films .
( Full article . )
An Evangelical group was also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Haiti in 2010 for adoption in the U.S. after a devastating earthquake rocked the island nation .
The group had ties to Laura Silsby and the Bill and Hillary Clinton Foundation .
We certainly hope that the Barretts ’ adoptions were all above board , and that the children were not being taken away from family members who were willing to care for them .
Otherwise , this could be an issue the Globalists use to influence her voting on the Supreme Court , which some have speculated is what has happened @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also has adopted children .
Another Phony Conservative Judge Nominated to the Supreme Court Evangelicals , conservatives and pro-lifers are dancing with glee over Donald Trump ’ s nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to replace Ruth Bader Ginsberg on the U.S. Supreme Court .
They shouldn ’ t be .
Once again , conservatives are being conned .
I keep reminding people that SCOTUS has been dominated by Republican appointments since before the infamous Roe v Wade decision in 1973 .
We are talking a half-century .
Here is the breakdown of how @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The vote was 7 in support and 2 opposed .
The list of the votes of the nine justices on the Supreme Court in the Roe v. Wade decision and who appointed them is as follows : As you can see , GOP appointments had a 6 – 3 majority when the Roe decision was decided .
Note that 5 of those 6 Republican-appointed justices voted in favor of Roe .
They didn ’ t even need a Democrat-appointed justice to vote for Roe ( which 2 did ) in order for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , that only one Republican-appointed justice voted against Roe .
To put it another way : 66 % of the Democrat-appointed justices voted for Roe , while 83 % of the Republican-appointed justices voted for Roe .
And , again , remember that the Republican Party has held a majority of the Supreme Court for 50 years , and yet Roe has never been overturned .
And Trump ’ s appointments are going to prove to be no better .
The recent excitement over a new Supreme Court appointment prompted me to do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enthused about Amy Coney Barrett .
After constitutional attorney Robert Barnes threw cold water on the choice and expressed his support for Judge Lagoa , I did some research and listened to talks and interviews with Judge Barrett .
She impresses me as being somewhat detached and devoid of empathy and warmth .
She stressed that a judge may not let “ personal preference ” color her ( emphasis added ) decisions .
She further went on to include morality under “ personal preferences.
” In her Hesburgh Lecture at Jacksonville University in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she was more partial to Hillary Clinton than Donald Trump .
She praised Justice Scalia for siding with a flag burner in a court decision .
An eye opener : with respect to the sentiment “ I want to appoint someone pro-life , ” she insisted that this is not the correct criteria to apply in selecting someone for the Supreme Court .
“ We shouldn ’ t be putting people on the Court who share our policy preferences.
” The right to life is a policy preference ?
She commented that she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ abortion would change .
She said this dispassionately and offered no hint of disapproval .
She implied that stare decisis [ litigation according to precedent , not the constitution ’ s words ] would hold sway here .
She went on to say that biological boys using girls ’ bathrooms is a “ who decides ” issue .
She never suggested that the idea is outrageous .
To her , the highest law is the Constitution and its interpretation is nuanced and impacted by many factors .
The Law of God the natural @ @ @ @ @ @ @ role to play .
Attorney Barnes believes Judge Coney Barret would recuse herself if she became involved in an abortion case .
Based on what I have seen and heard , I think he is too optimistic .
As with Gorsuch and Kavanaugh , Barrett is just another Big Government , Police State ideologue who will continue the assault against our constitutionally protected liberties and who will do nothing to overturn Roe .
Here is what Constitutional attorney Robert Barnes says about Barrett : Barrett sided with the government on almost every civil @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , every criminal case , while also siding with the government on the lockdowns , on uncompensated takings , on excusing First Amendment infringements & Fourth Amendment violations .
Barrett exclaimed the benefits of Jacobson , the decision that green-lit forced vaccines & carved out an emergency exception to Constitutional protection in “ public health ” or “ emergency ” cases used to justify forced sterilizations & detention camps .
Barrett excused or immunized questionable police conduct in almost every seizure case or use of force case she came across , many with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ demolished in the court of public opinion in the age of George Floyd .
Barrett hid behind precedent that fellow federal circuits said did not apply any longer to allow Chicago to prohibit pro-life activists from exercising their free speech , and did so w/o a concurring opinion as she did whenever she doubted precedent .
Barrett justified discriminating against someone participating in protests over the killing of his brother , in a case that will make easy headlines for her critics to make her look [ sic ] the misconduct-excuser her actual @ @ @ @ @ @ @ regulatory takings without compensation and government discrimination by siding with the government ’ s version once again ( like she has in a near record setting 95 % + of cases ) .
Barret found a dubious “ standing ” excuse to deny citizens the right to prevent the corrupt misappropriation of property for the building of the Obama library .
This is the kind of elite back-scratching Roberts-type jurists like Barrett do .
This is the part that infuriates me to no end : Evangelicals and conservatives seem to be totally blind @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
TOTALLY BLIND .
Of course , this helps explain why these same evangelicals and conservatives so sheepishly and robotically surrendered their liberties to the medical Gestapo over the corona scamdemic .
This also means that it will not bother evangelicals and conservatives that Barrett is a Big Government enabler of the tyrannical coronavirus lockdowns and shutdowns that have been taking place over the past six months .
Here is the story : Barrett ’ s record is troubling on many issues , with a ruling that gives Democrats in Illinois blanket authority @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mass hysteria standing out as particularly heinous .
Barrett concurred with the majority in Illinois Republican Party et al .
v. J.B. Pritzker , Governor of Illinois to keep the illegal lockdown in place and allow Democrats to rip up the Constitution under the guise of safety .
She hid behind the precedent of Jacobsen v. Massachusetts ( 1905 ) in an attempt to avoid culpability for her decision .
“ At least at this stage of the pandemic , Jacobson takes off the table any general challenge to [ Pritzker ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Amendment ’ s protection of liberty , ” the majority opinion read in the case .
It continued : “ [ W ] hile in the face of a pandemic the Governor of Illinois was not compelled to make a special dispensation for religious activities , see Elim , nothing in the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment barred him from doing so .
As in the cases reconciling the Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses , all that the Governor did was to limit to a certain degree the burden on religious @ @ @ @ @ @ @ executive order ] imposed.
” Barrett roll [ ed ] over to the far left and allow [ ed ] Democrats to rip up the Constitution .
Patriotic attorney Robert Barnes has levied additional criticism against Barrett for her unwillingness to stand up to Democrat overreach .
“ For example , Barrett , I would oppose her nomination personally .
So I would do whatever I can to see her nomination fail .
I have no interest in seeing someone like that on the bench , ” Barnes explained during an interview on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ She comes from the old money corporate South , a world I ’ m familiar with and the kind of people I ’ d never want to see in positions of power… That ’ s the world she comes from .
Her dad was a big Shell oil corporate lawyer , ” he continued .
Barnes explained how Barrett ’ s history working as a Clerk for deceased former Justice Antonin Scalia is giving the false impression that she shares his staunch originalist beliefs when that is not in fact the case .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to that of Chief Justice John Roberts , whose record of extreme cowardice on the bench has harmed the nation immeasurably .
“ This is how Justice Roberts got on the bench .
You do two things if you ’ re on the Republican side of the aisle : You let people know that you believe Roe v. Wade should be overturned even if you don ’ t believe that… And you play the corporate side of the equation , ” he said .
“ But most importantly , you get that Justice @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for you to be appointed to the judicial bench down the road… That ’ s why people are pushing Barrett , ” Barnes added .
Chuck Baldwin is a radio broadcaster , syndicated columnist , and pastor dedicated to preserving the historic principles upon which America was founded .
See his website .
Copyright © Chuck Baldwin Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Chuck Baldwin has written a very good critique of Supreme Court Justice nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett, while at the same time showing that “conservatives” have dominated the Court since the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, and have never been able to over-turn it.
Besides the issues highlighted in this article, it is reported that Judge Barrett and her husband have adopted children from Haiti.
This is a huge red flag, as Haiti is a known center for child trafficking and illegal adoptions.
Larry Romanoff, in his expose on the CIA MK-ULTRA program, mentions Haiti:
On this note, I would add my strong suspicions that the most horrid experiments, those that have not yet come to light, were outsourced to Haiti and Puerto Rico. It is not a secret that the US has for decades used Haiti as a private biological laboratory and, since that small nation has been under the absolute control of the US and under an absolute media embargo, the US military and the CIA have been able to conduct operations there without reservation or inhibition. Haiti is also a center for the worldwide pedophilia rings operated formerly for CIA experimentation and subsequently for purposes similar to those of Jeffrey Epstein – personal enjoyment and entrapment of politicians. An Italian social agency recently traced 640 of 1,000 pedophilia websites to a Haiti location, these websites offering not only live videos of the sexual abuse (some of it horrific) of children as young as 0 to 2 years of age, but also of the torture of these children as well as snuff films. (Full article.)
An Evangelical group was also found to be illegally trafficking children out of Haiti in 2010 for adoption in the U.S. after a devastating earthquake rocked the island nation. The group had ties to Laura Silsby and the Bill and Hillary Clinton Foundation.
We certainly hope that the Barretts’ adoptions were all above board, and that the children were not being taken away from family members who were willing to care for them.
Otherwise, this could be an issue the Globalists use to influence her voting on the Supreme Court, which some have speculated is what has happened to Chief Justice John Roberts, who also has adopted children.
Another Phony Conservative Judge Nominated to the Supreme Court
By Chuck Baldwin
LewRockwell.com
Evangelicals, conservatives and pro-lifers are dancing with glee over Donald Trump’s nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to replace Ruth Bader Ginsberg on the U.S. Supreme Court.
They shouldn’t be. Once again, conservatives are being conned.
I keep reminding people that SCOTUS has been dominated by Republican appointments since before the infamous Roe v Wade decision in 1973. We are talking a half-century.
Here is the breakdown of how justices voted on Roe back in 1973. The vote was 7 in support and 2 opposed. The list of the votes of the nine justices on the Supreme Court in the Roe v. Wade decision and who appointed them is as follows:
In support:
*Harry Blackmun (Richard M. Nixon, R)
*Warren Burger (Richard M. Nixon, R)
*William Douglas (Franklin D. Roosevelt, D)
*William Brennan Jr. (Dwight D. Eisenhower, R)
*Potter Stewart (Dwight D. Eisenhower, R)
*Thurgood Marshall (Lyndon Baines Johnson, D)
*Lewis Powell Jr. (Richard M. Nixon, R)
In opposition:
*Byron White (John F. Kennedy, D)
*William Rehnquist (Richard M. Nixon, R)
As you can see, GOP appointments had a 6 – 3 majority when the Roe decision was decided.
Note that 5 of those 6 Republican-appointed justices voted in favor of Roe.
They didn’t even need a Democrat-appointed justice to vote for Roe (which 2 did) in order for it to pass.
Notice, too, that only one Republican-appointed justice voted against Roe. To put it another way: 66% of the Democrat-appointed justices voted for Roe, while 83% of the Republican-appointed justices voted for Roe.
And, again, remember that the Republican Party has held a majority of the Supreme Court for 50 years, and yet Roe has never been overturned.
And Trump’s appointments are going to prove to be no better.
Joel Skousen quotes a source saying:
The recent excitement over a new Supreme Court appointment prompted me to do some research. I was initially very enthused about Amy Coney Barrett. After constitutional attorney Robert Barnes threw cold water on the choice and expressed his support for Judge Lagoa, I did some research and listened to talks and interviews with Judge Barrett. She impresses me as being somewhat detached and devoid of empathy and warmth. She stressed that a judge may not let “personal preference” color her (emphasis added) decisions. She further went on to include morality under “personal preferences.” In her Hesburgh Lecture at Jacksonville University in 2016, the impression was communicated that she was more partial to Hillary Clinton than Donald Trump. She praised Justice Scalia for siding with a flag burner in a court decision. An eye opener: with respect to the sentiment “I want to appoint someone pro-life,” she insisted that this is not the correct criteria to apply in selecting someone for the Supreme Court. “We shouldn’t be putting people on the Court who share our policy preferences.” The right to life is a policy preference? She commented that she didn’t believe the right to abortion would change. She said this dispassionately and offered no hint of disapproval. She implied that stare decisis [litigation according to precedent, not the constitution’s words] would hold sway here. She went on to say that biological boys using girls’ bathrooms is a “who decides” issue. She never suggested that the idea is outrageous. To her, the highest law is the Constitution and its interpretation is nuanced and impacted by many factors. The Law of God the natural law whose author is God has no role to play. Attorney Barnes believes Judge Coney Barret would recuse herself if she became involved in an abortion case. Based on what I have seen and heard, I think he is too optimistic.
As with Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, Barrett is just another Big Government, Police State ideologue who will continue the assault against our constitutionally protected liberties and who will do nothing to overturn Roe.
Here is what Constitutional attorney Robert Barnes says about Barrett:
Barrett sided with the government on almost every civil rights case, every big employer case, every criminal case, while also siding with the government on the lockdowns, on uncompensated takings, on excusing First Amendment infringements & Fourth Amendment violations. Barrett exclaimed the benefits of Jacobson, the decision that green-lit forced vaccines & carved out an emergency exception to Constitutional protection in “public health” or “emergency” cases used to justify forced sterilizations & detention camps. Barrett excused or immunized questionable police conduct in almost every seizure case or use of force case she came across, many with fact patterns that will make her easily demolished in the court of public opinion in the age of George Floyd. Barrett hid behind precedent that fellow federal circuits said did not apply any longer to allow Chicago to prohibit pro-life activists from exercising their free speech, and did so w/o a concurring opinion as she did whenever she doubted precedent. Barrett justified discriminating against someone participating in protests over the killing of his brother, in a case that will make easy headlines for her critics to make her look [sic] the misconduct-excuser her actual record says she is. Barrett justified regulatory takings without compensation and government discrimination by siding with the government’s version once again (like she has in a near record setting 95%+ of cases). Barret found a dubious “standing” excuse to deny citizens the right to prevent the corrupt misappropriation of property for the building of the Obama library. This is the kind of elite back-scratching Roberts-type jurists like Barrett do.
This is the part that infuriates me to no end: Evangelicals and conservatives seem to be totally blind to America’s burgeoning Police State. TOTALLY BLIND. Of course, this helps explain why these same evangelicals and conservatives so sheepishly and robotically surrendered their liberties to the medical Gestapo over the corona scamdemic.
This also means that it will not bother evangelicals and conservatives that Barrett is a Big Government enabler of the tyrannical coronavirus lockdowns and shutdowns that have been taking place over the past six months.
Here is the story:
Barrett’s record is troubling on many issues, with a ruling that gives Democrats in Illinois blanket authority to shut down society based on COVID-19 mass hysteria standing out as particularly heinous. Barrett concurred with the majority in Illinois Republican Party et al. v. J.B. Pritzker, Governor of Illinois to keep the illegal lockdown in place and allow Democrats to rip up the Constitution under the guise of safety. She hid behind the precedent of Jacobsen v. Massachusetts (1905) in an attempt to avoid culpability for her decision. “At least at this stage of the pandemic, Jacobson takes off the table any general challenge to [Pritzker’s executive order] based on the Fourteenth Amendment’s protection of liberty,” the majority opinion read in the case. It continued: “[W]hile in the face of a pandemic the Governor of Illinois was not compelled to make a special dispensation for religious activities, see Elim, nothing in the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment barred him from doing so. As in the cases reconciling the Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses, all that the Governor did was to limit to a certain degree the burden on religious exercise that [the governor’s executive order] imposed.” Barrett roll[ed] over to the far left and allow[ed] Democrats to rip up the Constitution. Patriotic attorney Robert Barnes has levied additional criticism against Barrett for her unwillingness to stand up to Democrat overreach. “For example, Barrett, I would oppose her nomination personally. So I would do whatever I can to see her nomination fail. I have no interest in seeing someone like that on the bench,” Barnes explained during an interview on the Viva Frei YouTube channel. “She comes from the old money corporate South, a world I’m familiar with and the kind of people I’d never want to see in positions of power… That’s the world she comes from. Her dad was a big Shell oil corporate lawyer,” he continued. Barnes explained how Barrett’s history working as a Clerk for deceased former Justice Antonin Scalia is giving the false impression that she shares his staunch originalist beliefs when that is not in fact the case. He explained that her rise is similar to that of Chief Justice John Roberts, whose record of extreme cowardice on the bench has harmed the nation immeasurably. “This is how Justice Roberts got on the bench. You do two things if you’re on the Republican side of the aisle: You let people know that you believe Roe v. Wade should be overturned even if you don’t believe that… And you play the corporate side of the equation,” he said. “But most importantly, you get that Justice and his extended intellectual heavyweights to lobby for you to be appointed to the judicial bench down the road… That’s why people are pushing Barrett,” Barnes added.
Continue reading the article at LewRockwell.com
Chuck Baldwin is a radio broadcaster, syndicated columnist, and pastor dedicated to preserving the historic principles upon which America was founded. See his website. Copyright © Chuck Baldwin
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-10-12--Facebook Purge of Alternative Health Sites Coming – Censors Story on Doctor Curing 1700 Patients wit

Facebook Purge of Alternative Health Sites Coming – Censors Story on Doctor Curing 1700 Patients with HCQ: “Could Cause Physical Harm – Make Some People Feel Unsafe on Facebook”

As we get closer to the November elections , Big Tech social media companies appear to be getting ready to purge all accounts that dare to question Big Pharma and their COVID narrative .
While articles published by Health Impact News are regularly censored because their own biased “ Fact-checkers ” police Facebook ready to squash any dissenters who dare to publish the truth , in recent days we have been warned more sternly that our page will soon be “ unpublished ” if we continue to publish what they deem “ fake news.
” Our latest “ crime ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the interview of Dr. Brian Tyson , who claims he has cured over 1700 patients with hydroxychloroquine .
See : California Medical Doctor Cures Over 1700 Patients with COVID Using Hydroxychloroquine Our post about the article was removed , and comments from our readers stated that when they tried to share the article on Facebook via their own pages , they were banned for 30 days .
The reason Facebook gave for censoring the article was : Yes , you read that correctly .
A positive article about a medical doctor curing 1700 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ harm , ” and “ make people feel unsafe.
” What I find amazing about the Facebook censorship issue , is that you can find complaints from BOTH the Right and the Left for censorship , with each side claiming that Facebook is politically biased against them or their particular political views .
But the censorship of Health Impact News articles is quite obviously motivated by protecting Big Pharma and their narratives , especially right now regarding COVID .
We don ’ t take a political position , except to give equal opportunity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are in the pocket of Big Pharma .
Here at Health Impact News we have already been banned on Twitter and Pinterest , and we have already stopped publishing videos on Google ’ s YouTube , using the independent Bitchute platform instead .
We knew it was just a matter of time before we were banned on Facebook as well , and it looks like that day is drawing very close now .
Nobody should be relying on these largely Pharma-funded Social Media giants to get reliable information anymore .
Very soon they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that dares to publish the truth .
Big Pharma wants you to only get the news they approve of , and to only get your news from their sources will lead to your DEATH .
They have already killed tens of thousands , if not hundreds of thousands in the U.S. during the COVID response , and as we stated yesterday and many times in the past , the censorship of HCQ will no doubt go down as one of the largest medical scams of all time , as thousands of doctors who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID are censored , just as Facebook did yesterday with the Dr. Brian Tyson article .
This is the New America .
Truth is condemned , and lies are promoted to literally kill people .
And it happens in BOTH political parties .
It didn ’ t happen overnight .
Some of us have been warning the public for years about the tyranny of Big Pharma , especially in regards to vaccines .
But COVID has now taken it to a whole new level , as the Globalists make their move to take @ @ @ @ @ @ @ economy , and implement their New World Order .
To bypass the Big Tech censorship , please see our article about using RSS feeds to create your own newsfeed .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
As we get closer to the November elections, Big Tech social media companies appear to be getting ready to purge all accounts that dare to question Big Pharma and their COVID narrative.
While articles published by Health Impact News are regularly censored because their own biased “Fact-checkers” police Facebook ready to squash any dissenters who dare to publish the truth, in recent days we have been warned more sternly that our page will soon be “unpublished” if we continue to publish what they deem “fake news.”
Our latest “crime” was the article we published yesterday with the interview of Dr. Brian Tyson, who claims he has cured over 1700 patients with hydroxychloroquine. See:
Our post about the article was removed, and comments from our readers stated that when they tried to share the article on Facebook via their own pages, they were banned for 30 days.
I just got blocked from FB for 30 days for sharing this article. – Walter
The reason Facebook gave for censoring the article was:
We have these standards because misinformation that could cause physical harm can make some people feel unsafe on Facebook.
Yes, you read that correctly. A positive article about a medical doctor curing 1700 patients of COVID “could cause physical harm,” and “make people feel unsafe.”
What I find amazing about the Facebook censorship issue, is that you can find complaints from BOTH the Right and the Left for censorship, with each side claiming that Facebook is politically biased against them or their particular political views.
But the censorship of Health Impact News articles is quite obviously motivated by protecting Big Pharma and their narratives, especially right now regarding COVID. We don’t take a political position, except to give equal opportunity to criticize both parties as both sides are in the pocket of Big Pharma.
Life Without Big Tech Social Media
Here at Health Impact News we have already been banned on Twitter and Pinterest, and we have already stopped publishing videos on Google’s YouTube, using the independent Bitchute platform instead.
We knew it was just a matter of time before we were banned on Facebook as well, and it looks like that day is drawing very close now.
Nobody should be relying on these largely Pharma-funded Social Media giants to get reliable information anymore. Very soon they will be completely removing any independent voice that dares to publish the truth.
Big Pharma wants you to only get the news they approve of, and to only get your news from their sources will lead to your DEATH.
They have already killed tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands in the U.S. during the COVID response, and as we stated yesterday and many times in the past, the censorship of HCQ will no doubt go down as one of the largest medical scams of all time, as thousands of doctors who report a 100% cure rate from COVID are censored, just as Facebook did yesterday with the Dr. Brian Tyson article.
This is the New America. Truth is condemned, and lies are promoted to literally kill people. And it happens in BOTH political parties.
It didn’t happen overnight. Some of us have been warning the public for years about the tyranny of Big Pharma, especially in regards to vaccines. But COVID has now taken it to a whole new level, as the Globalists make their move to take over and “reset” the world economy, and implement their New World Order.
To bypass the Big Tech censorship, please see our article about using RSS feeds to create your own newsfeed.
See Also: