healthimpactnews--2020-09-23--Four Decades of Deceit and Covering Up Vaccine Injuries and Deaths Leads to Mistrust of American Pub

Four Decades of Deceit and Covering Up Vaccine Injuries and Deaths Leads to Mistrust of American Public Regarding Experimental COVID Vaccine

Vaccination : What ’ s Trust Got to Do with It ?
As the National Vaccine Information Center prepares to host the three day , three night Fifth International Public Conference on Vaccination that will be broadcast online Oct. 16-18 , 2020 , the theme we have chosen is Protecting Health and Autonomy in the 21st Century , because at no time in modern history has it been more important for all of us to take a stand and do just that .
This year , the orchestrated actions by governments around the world to restrict or eliminate civil liberties @ @ @ @ @ @ @ new coronavirus has been unprecedented , and it has had profound effects on the global economy and on the physical , mental and emotional health of billions of people .
1 By mid-September 2020 , there were about 29 million cases of the new Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ( SARS-CoV-2 ) reported worldwide with about 925,000 associated deaths .
The United States , the third most populated country in the world at 330 million people , had recorded over seven million cases and 198,000 deaths , with an estimated 598 deaths per million @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rate pthan Sweden , 2where health officials have refused to order masking or lock down the country and allowed the population to acquire natural herd immunity to the virus .
3 4 Overall COVID-19 Mortality Less Than One Percent According to the World Health Organization ( WHO ) , the overall mortality rate for the new SARS coronavirus causing COVID-19 is about 0.6 percent , 5 although some scientists say it is lower , 6 while others estimate it can be as high as one to two percent in some parts of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a 50 percent mortality rate 8or smallpox , at 30 percent ; 9 tuberculosis at 20 to 70 percent ; 10 diphtheria at 5 to 10 percent ; 11 or the 1918 influenza pandemic with a 2.5 percent mortality rate , 12 COVID-19 is near the bottom of the infectious diseases mortality scale with a less one percent mortality rate in most countries .
Those at highest risk for complications and death include the elderly and those with one or more poor health conditions .
13 The CDC recently reported that only six @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to coronavirus infection and 94 percent of the people who died also had influenza or pneumonia ; heart , lung or kidney disease ; high blood pressure ; diabetes , or another underlying poor health condition .
14 Most studies suggest it is rare for children to suffer complications and die from COVID-19 .
15 But seven months after the World Health Organization 16 declared a coronavirus pandemic , 17 and public health officials persuaded lawmakers to turn the world upside down , a lot of people are asking questions and so are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the facts .
Where did the new respiratory virus come from ?
The most popular narratives about the mutated coronavirus is that it either jumped out of a bat or another animal in a Chinese wet food market 18 19 or escaped out of a biohazard lab in 2019 , 20 21 but scientists continue to argue about which scenario is more likely .
22 If I wear a cloth facemask , does it really prevent me from getting infected with or transmitting COVID-19 ?
There is an ongoing debate in the medical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ idea for all healthy children and adults to wear cloth masks when they leave their home .
23 In March 2020 , the US Surgeon General ordered the American public to stop buying and wearing masks because “ they are not effective in preventing general public from catching coronavirus ” 24 and “ actually can increase the spread of coronavirus , ” which was the position of the World Health Organization .
25 But in April , the CDC walked back its “ do not mask ” order and urged all healthy Americans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when entering public spaces .
26 In June , the World Health Organization was continuing to say that , But by June , a number of state Governors and local governments had mandated facemask wearing and an epidemic of mask shaming had begun , 28 29 which led to public protests against masking mandates.30 In August , the CDC doubled down and expanded face masking directives to include all children over the age of two , 31 while the World Health Organization warned that children under the age of six should not wear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
32 So confusion reigns .
While some scientists are saying that if all healthy people are forced to wear face masks it will not stop the coronavirus pandemic and gives a dangerous and false illusion of safety , 33 other scientists are demonizing the refusers , alleging that people refusing to mask up are “ sociopathic ” and have lower levels of empathy .
34 About 30 U.S. states require masking for young children and adults who enter public spaces , 35 and some states are leveling steep fines of up to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ anyone who fails to comply .
36 Washington state has made not wearing a mask in public a misdemeanor crime 37 and central Texas officials say they wish they could put people in prison for refusing to wear a mask .
38 More than 50 countries in the world now require people to cover their faces when they leave home and some do fine and imprison people who go outside without wearing a mask .
39 So what about getting tested for COVID-19 ?
The CDC says that people should get tested if @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in contact with someone who has been diagnosed with the infection .
There is also an antibody test to identify whether or not you have been infected in the past .
40 But lab tests are not always reliable and people are asking this logical question : If I get a lab test , will it accurately identify if I am currently infected or have been infected with COVID-19 in the past ?
Unfortunately , it ’ s not clear how accurate any of the tests are , especially the antibody test for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ may not be the only way to measure immunity .
41 The best guess is that the range of reported false negative results for the nasal swab test is between two and 50 percent , and the reported false negative results for the antibody blood test is up to 30 percent , depending upon when during or after the infection testing is performed .
42 In July , a state lab in Connecticut admitted that 90 out of 144 people tested during a 30 day period – most of them nursing home residents @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because of faulty , false positive lab tests .
43 In August , 77 football players in the National Football league were given false positive test results when , after retesting , all the tests came back negative .
44 People are also wondering about what happens after they get COVID-19 , asking this question : If I recover from COVID-19 will I only get temporary immunity or will I have long-term immunity against re-infection ?
The CDC says it is unknown how long immunity lasts or whether you can get the new @ @ @ @ @ @ @ last spring researchers found that out of 68 uninfected persons , the blood from one third of them contained helper T-cells that recognized the mutated SARS coronavirus .
They concluded the presence of these defensive helper T cells gives evidence for some residual immunity that may have been produced after common cold infections caused by other types of coronaviruses .
This , the scientists said , “ bodes well for the development of long-term protective immunity.
” 46 Another important study was published in the medical literature in August providing evidence for robust @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who had recovered from even mild or asymptomatic cases of COVID-19 but had no detectable virus-specific antibodies .
47 If people can have strong immune responses without symptoms and traditional antibody tests for proof of immunity don ’ t apply to COVID-19 , public health officials may be underestimating the extent of population-level herd immunity that already exists in the U.S. , where there have been more cases reported than anywhere else .
While doctors debate the science , it is becoming clearer that the response to the new coronavirus infection by government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ disaster .
The anxiety , fear , and chaos created by regulations instituted by most governments after the declaration of a COVID-19 pandemic in March 2019 has torn the fabric of societies and affected public opinion about public health laws and vaccination .
48 Now the people are being told that there is one – and only one – simple solution to resolving the crisis and getting back to normal : that is , the only way we can take off our masks and touch , hug , kiss , or come close @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 52 53 54 is for every person living in every country to get injected with one of the liability-free COVID-19 vaccines being fast tracked to market .
55 56 57 58 59 In April , World Health Organization officials at the United Nations launched a global initiative “ to end the Covid-19 pandemic , ” proclaiming that , “ no one is safe until everyone is safe.
” 60 By May , they were warning that if every person in the world doesn ’ t get injected with a COVID-19 vaccination , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 61 The World Health Organization , 62 US government 63 64 65 66 and lawmakers in the European Union , 67 along with wealthy and politically powerful non-governmental organizations ( NGOs ) like the Gates Foundation , 68 69 70 GAVI , the Vaccine Alliance , 71 and Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations ( CEPI ) 72 have given the pharmaceutical industry tens of billions of dollars to develop and fast track experimental coronavirus vaccines to market and promote their universal use .
73 74 At the same time , governments have given @ @ @ @ @ @ @ when COVID-19 vaccines injure or kill people .
75 76 The hard sell is on , but a lot of people are not buying it .
Every poll taken this year has revealed that between 40 and 70 percent of people living in the U.S. and Europe don ’ t plan to get a COVID-19 vaccine when it is licensed .
77 78 79 80 81 82 Populations in developed countries are resisting the siren call for “ solidarity , ” as doubt about COVID-19 vaccines is becoming more common in developing counties @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pushback by a wary public has taken government officials by surprise .
Apparently , they were banking that the economic and social deprivation , fear and chaos surrounding lockdowns would produce a bull market for experimental mRNA and DNA COVID-19 vaccines using technology that never has been licensed for humans .
84 It is widely acknowledged now that a solid two-thirds of Americans or more will “ just say no ” to getting injected with a vaccine containing lab altered parts of a new coronavirus that scientists admit they still don ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ preliminary clinical trials have revealed may well cause more than just a few minor reactions .
86 A frustrated top U.S. health official has name-called Americans , who refuse to go along with public health policies and laws , calling them “ anti-science ” and “ anti-authority.
” 87 88 The truth is , people in this country and many others just don ’ t have confidence in the quality and quantity of the science or government health officials they are being told to trust .
89 Angry that a growing number of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sleeves for a vaccine that is being rushed to market at “ warp speed , ” public health officials , 90 billionaire Silicon Valley technocrats , 91 92 93 doctors , attorneys and bioethics professors , 94 95 96 97 98 and politicians 99 are beating the drum for swift enactment of “ no exceptions ” mandatory vaccination laws as soon as COVID-19 vaccines are licensed .
100 Already , some cheerleaders at leading universities are banging that drum for approving and using experimental COVID-19 vaccines even before testing is done , 101 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people to be the first to get the vaccine because it is their “ civic duty ” to protect everyone else .
102 They warn that “ herd immunity may not be achieved if people refuse to take the coronavirus vaccine , 103 104 and say that , in order to keep society “ safe , ” laws must be passed to threaten and coerce you and your minor children to get vaccinated or face crippling social sanctions that will effectively take away your liberty and destroy your life .
105 People in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Protest Lockdowns , Defending Freedom This summer , huge public demonstrations defending freedom in Berlin , 106 London , 107 Paris 108 and Copenhagen saw tens of thousands of citizens gather to protest masking 109 and other oppressive coronavirus lockdown policies , which have severely restricted normal physical contact between people , caused widespread unemployment , 110 and harmed their physical , mental and emotional health .
111 Like in Europe , people living in Canada , 112 Australia 113 114 and New Zealand 115 also are resisting months of social distancing policies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such as freedom of speech and assembly .
The U.S. has seen similar but smaller public demonstrations opposing forced masking , social distancing and lockdown laws and defending freedom in Virginia , 116 Pennsylvania , 117 Wisconsin , 118 Michigan , 119California 120 and other states , as record numbers of Americans struggle with unemployment , 121 122 the destruction of small middle class businesses , 123 mortgage defaults 124 and bankruptcy filings ; 125steep increases in anxiety and depression , 126 127 drug and alcohol addiction , 128 child and spousal abuse @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sanctions for Failure to Get Vaccinated May Align with Lockdown Sanctions The punishing social sanctions being talked about if you refuse a COVID-19 vaccination are likely to be enforced using government-operated electronic tracking systems linked to digital “ immunity passports ” that require you to “ prove ” you are immune to the new SARS coronavirus before you are allowed to work in an office building or enter other public spaces .
131 132 133 134 These social sanctions for failure to vaccinate may closely resemble the types of social interaction restrictions enforced @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the past year .
In the U.S. , most public health laws , including vaccine laws , are enacted by the states , 135 while the federal government makes vaccine use recommendations and can mandate vaccines for people crossing national or state borders .
Local city and county governments also can impose their own public health regulations .
136 That is why some states and cities have seen very restrictive COVID-19 pandemic masking 137 and lockdown regulations 138 and others have been more open .
139 So whether or not you will be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shot next year primarily will be determined by your state ’ s Governor and the representatives who have been elected to make laws in your state Capitol .
140 Depending upon where you live and the political philosophy of the majority of representatives in your state legislature , after the COVID-19 vaccine is licensed by the federal Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) and recommended by the CDC for use by all children and adults , 141 if you refuse to get a COVID-19 shot , you could be blocked from : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ work in an office And you could be prohibited from checking into a hospital for surgery , or visiting a family member in a nursing home , or blocked from obtaining private health insurance and Medicaid or Medicare .
In other words , if you refuse to get a coronavirus vaccination , you could be subjected to the kinds of punitive social sanctions I have been predicting and publicly warned about since 1997 , 143 144 145 146 sanctions that are already being applied to Americans who decline to get or give their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recommended ” liability free vaccines 147 and already are being denied an education , medical care , and employment .
148 149 Doctors and public health officials wondering why people don ’ t trust what they say about infectious diseases and vaccination , including coronavirus and COVID-19 vaccines , only have to look in the mirror to answer the question .
Since 1982 , parents of vaccine injured children have been begging doctors to do the kind of science that will explain why so many highly vaccinated children , who don ’ t @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are stuck on sick and suffering with brain and autoimmune disorders that never go away .
150 For four decades we have been asking doctors and government health officials to stop sweeping casualties of inhumane one-size-fits all vaccine policies under the rug .
151 What we get from medical professors in universities receiving lots of money from the government and pharmaceutical companies , and from doctors developing vaccines , and from public health officials pushing “ no exceptions ” vaccination policies is threats , name-calling , bullying and punishment if we try to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 153 154 There is no other word for it but abuse .
They order us to obey them but refuse to take responsibility for what happens when we obey the orders they give .
They expect us to trust them and refuse to care about the victims of vaccination when the benefits do not outweigh the risks .
Instead , they act to protect the power and profit-making of their business partners : the pharmaceutical industry , medical trade associations , multi-national media corporations and Silicon Valley billionaires , and leave vaccine victims @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s trust got to do with it ?
Broken trust has everything to do with why the majority of people in the U.S. and Europe do not want to roll the dice and find out whether the odds of surviving a COVID-19 vaccination are in their favor .
It is during this extraordinary time of great challenge and opportunity that NVIC is sponsoring the Fifth International Public Conference on Vaccination .
Our conference will create an expanded base of knowledge about vaccine science , policy , law and ethics brought to you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who will empower you with information you need to become an effective vaccine freedom advocate .
Go to NVIC.org and register today for this historic conference celebrating freedom of thought , speech and conscience and gain permanent online access to this valuable video library of information .
It ’ s your health , your family , your choice .
And our mission continues : No forced vaccination , not in America .
Read the the full article at NVIC.org .
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Create Your Own Newsfeed Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist ( kidney doctor ) , Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people .
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real , ethical medicine .
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines , no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public .
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt Big Pharma and government health authorities @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for all children , and even adults .
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact , part of the Health Impact News network .

Vaccination: What’s Trust Got to Do with It?
by Barbara Loe Fisher
National Vaccine Information Center
As the National Vaccine Information Center prepares to host the three day, three night Fifth International Public Conference on Vaccination that will be broadcast online Oct. 16-18, 2020, the theme we have chosen is Protecting Health and Autonomy in the 21st Century, because at no time in modern history has it been more important for all of us to take a stand and do just that.
This year, the orchestrated actions by governments around the world to restrict or eliminate civil liberties in response to the emergence of a new coronavirus has been unprecedented, and it has had profound effects on the global economy and on the physical, mental and emotional health of billions of people. 1
By mid-September 2020, there were about 29 million cases of the new Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) reported worldwide with about 925,000 associated deaths.
The United States, the third most populated country in the world at 330 million people, had recorded over seven million cases and 198,000 deaths, with an estimated 598 deaths per million people, which is a higher death rate pthan Sweden, 2where health officials have refused to order masking or lock down the country and allowed the population to acquire natural herd immunity to the virus. 3 4
Overall COVID-19 Mortality Less Than One Percent
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the overall mortality rate for the new SARS coronavirus causing COVID-19 is about 0.6 percent, 5 although some scientists say it is lower, 6 while others estimate it can be as high as one to two percent in some parts of the world. 7
Compared to Ebola with a 50 percent mortality rate 8or smallpox, at 30 percent; 9 tuberculosis at 20 to 70 percent; 10 diphtheria at 5 to 10 percent; 11 or the 1918 influenza pandemic with a 2.5 percent mortality rate, 12 COVID-19 is near the bottom of the infectious diseases mortality scale with a less one percent mortality rate in most countries.
Those at highest risk for complications and death include the elderly and those with one or more poor health conditions. 13
The CDC recently reported that only six percent of COVID-19-related deaths were solely due to coronavirus infection and 94 percent of the people who died also had influenza or pneumonia; heart, lung or kidney disease; high blood pressure; diabetes, or another underlying poor health condition. 14
Most studies suggest it is rare for children to suffer complications and die from COVID-19. 15
But seven months after the World Health Organization 16 declared a coronavirus pandemic, 17 and public health officials persuaded lawmakers to turn the world upside down, a lot of people are asking questions and so are doctors who disagree with each other about the facts.
Questions like:
Where did the new respiratory virus come from?
The most popular narratives about the mutated coronavirus is that it either jumped out of a bat or another animal in a Chinese wet food market 18 19 or escaped out of a biohazard lab in 2019, 20 21 but scientists continue to argue about which scenario is more likely. 22
And this question:
If I wear a cloth facemask, does it really prevent me from getting infected with or transmitting COVID-19?
There is an ongoing debate in the medical community about whether it is a good idea for all healthy children and adults to wear cloth masks when they leave their home. 23
In March 2020, the US Surgeon General ordered the American public to stop buying and wearing masks because “they are not effective in preventing general public from catching coronavirus” 24 and “actually can increase the spread of coronavirus,” which was the position of the World Health Organization. 25
But in April, the CDC walked back its “do not mask” order and urged all healthy Americans to voluntarily wear homemade cloth face coverings when entering public spaces. 26
In June, the World Health Organization was continuing to say that,
“At the present time, the widespread use of masks everywhere is not supported by high-quality scientific evidence, and there are potential benefits and harms to consider…Masks on their own will not protect you from COVID-19.” 27
But by June, a number of state Governors and local governments had mandated facemask wearing and an epidemic of mask shaming had begun, 28 29 which led to public protests against masking mandates.30
In August, the CDC doubled down and expanded face masking directives to include all children over the age of two, 31 while the World Health Organization warned that children under the age of six should not wear masks but children over age 12 should. 32
So confusion reigns. While some scientists are saying that if all healthy people are forced to wear face masks it will not stop the coronavirus pandemic and gives a dangerous and false illusion of safety, 33 other scientists are demonizing the refusers, alleging that people refusing to mask up are “sociopathic” and have lower levels of empathy. 34
About 30 U.S. states require masking for young children and adults who enter public spaces, 35 and some states are leveling steep fines of up to $1,000 or threatening jail time for anyone who fails to comply. 36
Washington state has made not wearing a mask in public a misdemeanor crime 37 and central Texas officials say they wish they could put people in prison for refusing to wear a mask. 38
More than 50 countries in the world now require people to cover their faces when they leave home and some do fine and imprison people who go outside without wearing a mask. 39
So what about getting tested for COVID-19? The CDC says that people should get tested if they have COVID-19 symptoms or have been in contact with someone who has been diagnosed with the infection.
There is also an antibody test to identify whether or not you have been infected in the past. 40
But lab tests are not always reliable and people are asking this logical question:
If I get a lab test, will it accurately identify if I am currently infected or have been infected with COVID-19 in the past?
Unfortunately, it’s not clear how accurate any of the tests are, especially the antibody test for past infection because the presence of antibodies may not be the only way to measure immunity. 41
The best guess is that the range of reported false negative results for the nasal swab test is between two and 50 percent, and the reported false negative results for the antibody blood test is up to 30 percent, depending upon when during or after the infection testing is performed. 42
In July, a state lab in Connecticut admitted that 90 out of 144 people tested during a 30 day period – most of them nursing home residents – were inaccurately informed they were infected because of faulty, false positive lab tests. 43
In August, 77 football players in the National Football league were given false positive test results when, after retesting, all the tests came back negative. 44
People are also wondering about what happens after they get COVID-19, asking this question:
If I recover from COVID-19 will I only get temporary immunity or will I have long-term immunity against re-infection?
The CDC says it is unknown how long immunity lasts or whether you can get the new coronavirus infection twice. 45
However, last spring researchers found that out of 68 uninfected persons, the blood from one third of them contained helper T-cells that recognized the mutated SARS coronavirus.
They concluded the presence of these defensive helper T cells gives evidence for some residual immunity that may have been produced after common cold infections caused by other types of coronaviruses. This, the scientists said, “bodes well for the development of long-term protective immunity.” 46
Another important study was published in the medical literature in August providing evidence for robust memory T cell immune responses in people who had recovered from even mild or asymptomatic cases of COVID-19 but had no detectable virus-specific antibodies. 47
If people can have strong immune responses without symptoms and traditional antibody tests for proof of immunity don’t apply to COVID-19, public health officials may be underestimating the extent of population-level herd immunity that already exists in the U.S., where there have been more cases reported than anywhere else.
COVID-19 Public Health Laws A Public Relations Disaster
While doctors debate the science, it is becoming clearer that the response to the new coronavirus infection by government health officials has been a public relations disaster.
The anxiety, fear, and chaos created by regulations instituted by most governments after the declaration of a COVID-19 pandemic in March 2019 has torn the fabric of societies and affected public opinion about public health laws and vaccination. 48
Now the people are being told that there is one – and only one – simple solution to resolving the crisis and getting back to normal: that is, the only way we can take off our masks and touch, hug, kiss, or come close to each other again 49 50 51 52 53 54 is for every person living in every country to get injected with one of the liability-free COVID-19 vaccines being fast tracked to market. 55 56 57 58 59
In April, World Health Organization officials at the United Nations launched a global initiative “to end the Covid-19 pandemic, ”proclaiming that, “no one is safe until everyone is safe.”60 By May, they were warning that if every person in the world doesn’t get injected with a COVID-19 vaccination, the virus “may never go away.” 61
The World Health Organization, 62 US government 63 64 65 66 and lawmakers in the European Union, 67 along with wealthy and politically powerful non-governmental organizations (NGOs) like the Gates Foundation, 68 69 70 GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance, 71 and Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) 72 have given the pharmaceutical industry tens of billions of dollars to develop and fast track experimental coronavirus vaccines to market and promote their universal use. 73 74
At the same time, governments have given pharmaceutical companies a liability shield from lawsuits when COVID-19 vaccines injure or kill people. 75 76
The hard sell is on, but a lot of people are not buying it.
People Are Rejecting the COVID-19 Vaccine Sales Pitch
Every poll taken this year has revealed that between 40 and 70 percent of people living in the U.S. and Europe don’t plan to get a COVID-19 vaccine when it is licensed. 77 78 79 80 81 82
Populations in developed countries are resisting the siren call for “solidarity,” as doubt about COVID-19 vaccines is becoming more common in developing counties, too. 83
Apparently, the pushback by a wary public has taken government officials by surprise.
Apparently, they were banking that the economic and social deprivation, fear and chaos surrounding lockdowns would produce a bull market for experimental mRNA and DNA COVID-19 vaccines using technology that never has been licensed for humans. 84
It is widely acknowledged now that a solid two-thirds of Americans or more will “just say no” to getting injected with a vaccine containing lab altered parts of a new coronavirus that scientists admit they still don’t know much about, 85 vaccines that preliminary clinical trials have revealed may well cause more than just a few minor reactions. 86
A frustrated top U.S. health official has name-called Americans, who refuse to go along with public health policies and laws, calling them “anti-science” and “anti-authority.” 87 88
The truth is, people in this country and many others just don’t have confidence in the quality and quantity of the science or government health officials they are being told to trust. 89
Angry that a growing number of people are reluctant to roll up their sleeves for a vaccine that is being rushed to market at “warp speed,” public health officials, 90 billionaire Silicon Valley technocrats, 91 92 93 doctors, attorneys and bioethics professors, 94 95 96 97 98 and politicians 99 are beating the drum for swift enactment of “no exceptions” mandatory vaccination laws as soon as COVID-19 vaccines are licensed. 100
Already, some cheerleaders at leading universities are banging that drum for approving and using experimental COVID-19 vaccines even before testing is done, 101 and are calling for young, healthy people to be the first to get the vaccine because it is their “civic duty” to protect everyone else. 102
They warn that “herd immunity may not be achieved if people refuse to take the coronavirus vaccine, 103 104 and say that, in order to keep society “safe,” laws must be passed to threaten and coerce you and your minor children to get vaccinated or face crippling social sanctions that will effectively take away your liberty and destroy your life. 105
People in U.S. and Other Nations Rise Up to Protest Lockdowns, Defending Freedom
This summer, huge public demonstrations defending freedom in Berlin, 106 London, 107 Paris 108 and Copenhagen saw tens of thousands of citizens gather to protest masking 109 and other oppressive coronavirus lockdown policies, which have severely restricted normal physical contact between people, caused widespread unemployment, 110 and harmed their physical, mental and emotional health. 111
Like in Europe, people living in Canada, 112 Australia 113 114 and New Zealand 115 also are resisting months of social distancing policies that have eliminated fundamental human rights, such as freedom of speech and assembly.
The U.S. has seen similar but smaller public demonstrations opposing forced masking, social distancing and lockdown laws and defending freedom in Virginia, 116 Pennsylvania, 117 Wisconsin, 118 Michigan, 119California 120 and other states, as record numbers of Americans struggle with unemployment, 121 122 the destruction of small middle class businesses, 123 mortgage defaults 124 and bankruptcy filings; 125steep increases in anxiety and depression, 126 127 drug and alcohol addiction, 128 child and spousal abuse, 129 and divorce. 130
Social Sanctions for Failure to Get Vaccinated May Align with Lockdown Sanctions
The punishing social sanctions being talked about if you refuse a COVID-19 vaccination are likely to be enforced using government-operated electronic tracking systems linked to digital “immunity passports” that require you to “prove” you are immune to the new SARS coronavirus before you are allowed to work in an office building or enter other public spaces. 131 132 133 134
These social sanctions for failure to vaccinate may closely resemble the types of social interaction restrictions enforced in the U.S. and other countries over the past year.
In the U.S., most public health laws, including vaccine laws, are enacted by the states, 135 while the federal government makes vaccine use recommendations and can mandate vaccines for people crossing national or state borders.
Local city and county governments also can impose their own public health regulations. 136
That is why some states and cities have seen very restrictive COVID-19 pandemic masking 137 and lockdown regulations 138 and others have been more open. 139
So whether or not you will be punished for refusing to get a COVID-19 shot next year primarily will be determined by your state’s Governor and the representatives who have been elected to make laws in your state Capitol. 140
Depending upon where you live and the political philosophy of the majority of representatives in your state legislature, after the COVID-19 vaccine is licensed by the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and recommended by the CDC for use by all children and adults, 141 if you refuse to get a COVID-19 shot, you could be blocked from: 142
Being employed and going to work in an office
Getting and education
Obtaining a driver’s license or passport
Boarding a train or other public transportation
Attending a sports game or concert
Entering a store, restaurant, bar, coffee shop or nail salon
Booking an appointment with a doctor
And you could be prohibited from checking into a hospital for surgery, or visiting a family member in a nursing home, or blocked from obtaining private health insurance and Medicaid or Medicare.
In other words, if you refuse to get a coronavirus vaccination, you could be subjected to the kinds of punitive social sanctions I have been predicting and publicly warned about since 1997, 143 144 145 146 sanctions that are already being applied to Americans who decline to get or give their children dozens of doses of CDC “recommended” liability free vaccines 147 and already are being denied an education, medical care, and employment. 148 149
Broken Promises Leads to Broken Trust
Doctors and public health officials wondering why people don’t trust what they say about infectious diseases and vaccination, including coronavirus and COVID-19 vaccines, only have to look in the mirror to answer the question.
Since 1982, parents of vaccine injured children have been begging doctors to do the kind of science that will explain why so many highly vaccinated children, who don’t get measles or chicken pox anymore, are stuck on sick and suffering with brain and autoimmune disorders that never go away. 150
For four decades we have been asking doctors and government health officials to stop sweeping casualties of inhumane one-size-fits all vaccine policies under the rug. 151
What we get from medical professors in universities receiving lots of money from the government and pharmaceutical companies, and from doctors developing vaccines, and from public health officials pushing “no exceptions” vaccination policies is threats, name-calling, bullying and punishment if we try to exercise informed consent to vaccination. 152 153 154
There is no other word for it but abuse.
They order us to obey them but refuse to take responsibility for what happens when we obey the orders they give. They expect us to trust them and refuse to care about the victims of vaccination when the benefits do not outweigh the risks.
Instead, they act to protect the power and profit-making of their business partners: the pharmaceutical industry, medical trade associations, multi-national media corporations and Silicon Valley billionaires, and leave vaccine victims to take care of themselves.
What’s trust got to do with it?
Broken trust has everything to do with why the majority of people in the U.S. and Europe do not want to roll the dice and find out whether the odds of surviving a COVID-19 vaccination are in their favor.
It is during this extraordinary time of great challenge and opportunity that NVIC is sponsoring the Fifth International Public Conference on Vaccination.
Our conference will create an expanded base of knowledge about vaccine science, policy, law and ethics brought to you by more than 40 distinguished speakers, who will empower you with information you need to become an effective vaccine freedom advocate. Go to NVIC.org and register today for this historic conference celebrating freedom of thought, speech and conscience and gain permanent online access to this valuable video library of information.
It’s your health, your family, your choice.
And our mission continues: No forced vaccination, not in America.
Read the the full article at NVIC.org.
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.
See Also:
Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Book – The Vaccine Court “The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program” ORDER HERE!
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
Order here!
Make a Statement for Health Freedom!
Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children, and even adults.
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact, part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!


healthimpactnews--2020-09-24--Texas GOP to Governor Abbott: Open Texas Now!

That ’ s the call to action of a resolution passed nearly unanimously by the Republican Party of Texas executive committee , urging Gov .
Greg Abbott to “ immediately rescind all COVID-related mandates , closures , and restrictions ” and reopen the state .
Consisting of one man and one woman from each of the state ’ s 31 senate districts , the SREC is , essentially , the governing body of the Republican Party of Texas , meeting several times a year to do the party ’ s business , such as organizing convention and passing resolutions .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ for Senate District 15 in Houston who authored the “ Open Texas Now ” resolution , says he was motivated by Abbott ’ s announcement last week , which allowed some businesses to open at 75 percent capacity while others were forced to remain closed .
“ [ Abbott ’ s ] announcement last week about another incremental increase in capacity was the last straw .
It is so blindingly obvious to everyone that the lockdowns and restrictions were a mistake and devastated the lives of so many people , ” Garcia told @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that last week ’ s announcement would finally put an end to this madness .
Instead , we just got more games about 50 or 75 percent capacity … for some businesses … in some regions .
It ’ s such a farce at this point and totally disconnected from scientific or public health considerations .
It was clear that the state party had to take a stand , so I authored and submitted that resolution.
” The resolution passed overwhelmingly during the committee ’ s meeting in Houston this past weekend , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ four voting against .
Garcia also stressed that the goal of the resolution was not to “ punish ” Abbott , but rather to urge a swift course correction .
“ For a state party to publicly disagree with a sitting governor of the same party is not something any of us take lightly , and the instinct of loyalty to leadership is usually pretty strong among party activists .
So for this to happen underscores the depth of the anger and frustration out there , ” said Garcia .

By Brandon Waltens
Texas Scorecard
Excerpts:
“No Exceptions, No Delays…. Open Texas NOW.”
That’s the call to action of a resolution passed nearly unanimously by the Republican Party of Texas executive committee, urging Gov. Greg Abbott to “immediately rescind all COVID-related mandates, closures, and restrictions” and reopen the state.
Consisting of one man and one woman from each of the state’s 31 senate districts, the SREC is, essentially, the governing body of the Republican Party of Texas, meeting several times a year to do the party’s business, such as organizing convention and passing resolutions.
Rolando Garcia, the newly elected committeeman for Senate District 15 in Houston who authored the “Open Texas Now” resolution, says he was motivated by Abbott’s announcement last week, which allowed some businesses to open at 75 percent capacity while others were forced to remain closed.
“[Abbott’s] announcement last week about another incremental increase in capacity was the last straw. It is so blindingly obvious to everyone that the lockdowns and restrictions were a mistake and devastated the lives of so many people,” Garcia told Texas Scorecard. “I really hoped that last week’s announcement would finally put an end to this madness. Instead, we just got more games about 50 or 75 percent capacity … for some businesses … in some regions. It’s such a farce at this point and totally disconnected from scientific or public health considerations. It was clear that the state party had to take a stand, so I authored and submitted that resolution.”
The resolution passed overwhelmingly during the committee’s meeting in Houston this past weekend, with 54 members in favor and just four voting against.
“If we were voting based on what we hear from the grassroots, it would’ve passed with every single vote,” Garcia added.
Garcia also stressed that the goal of the resolution was not to “punish” Abbott, but rather to urge a swift course correction.


healthimpactnews--2020-09-24--Cashless Society Coming Soon? The Fed Is Preparing To Deposit “Digital Dollars” Directly To “Each Am

Cashless Society Coming Soon? The Fed Is Preparing To Deposit “Digital Dollars” Directly To “Each American”

In short , ever since the Fed launched QE and NIRP , it has been making the situation it has been trying to “ fix ” even worse while blowing the biggest asset price bubble in history .
And having recently accepted that its preferred stimulus pathway has failed to boost the broader economy , the blame has fallen on how monetary policy is intermediated , specifically the way the Fed creates excess reserves which end up at commercial banks instead of “ tricking down ” all the way to the consumer level .
To be sure , in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fed has tried to short-circuit this process , and in conjunction with the Treasury it has launched “ helicopter money ” which has resulted in a direct transfer of funds to US corporations via PPP loans , as well as to end consumers via the emergency $ 600 weekly unemployment benefits which however are set to expire unless renewed by Congress as explained last week , as Democrats and Republicans feud over which fiscal stimulus will be implemented next .
And yet , the lament is that even as the economy was desperately @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the funds created by the Fed and Treasury ( now that the US operates under a quasi-MMT regime ) did not make their way to those who need them the most : end consumers .
Which is why we read with great interest a Bloomberg interview with two former Fed officials : Simon Potter , who led the Federal Reserve Bank of New York ’ s markets group i.e.
, he was the head of the Fed ’ s Plunge Protection Team for years , and Julia Coronado , who spent eight @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s Board of Governors , who are among the innovators brainstorming solutions to what has emerged as the most crucial and difficult problem facing the Fed : get money swiftly to people who need it most in a crisis .
The response was striking : the two propose creating a monetary tool that they call recession insurance bonds , which draw on some of the advances in digital payments , which will be wired instantly to Americans .
As Coronado explained the details , Congress would grant the Federal Reserve an additional @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of GDP [ in a lump sum that would be divided equally and distributed ] to households in a recession .
Recession insurance bonds would be zero-coupon securities , a contingent asset of households that would basically lie in wait .
The trigger could be reaching the zero lower bound on interest rates or , as economist Claudia Sahm has proposed , a 0.5 percentage point increase in the unemployment rate .
The Fed would then activate the securities and deposit the funds digitally in households ’ apps .
As Potter added , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get money to people , and it ’ s too clunky .
We need a separate infrastructure .
The Fed could buy the bonds quickly without going to the private market .
On March 15 they could have said interest rates are now at zero , we ’ re activating X amount of the bonds , and we ’ ll be tracking the unemployment rate—if it increases above this level , we ’ ll buy more .
The bonds will be on the asset side of the Fed ’ s balance sheet ; @ @ @ @ @ @ @ accounts will be on the liability side.
” Essentially , the Fed is proposing creating a hybrid digital legal tender unlike reserves which are stuck within the financial system , and which it can deposit directly into US consumer accounts .
In short , as we summarized “ The Fed Is Planning To Send Money Directly To Americans In The Next Crisis “ , something we reminded readers of on Monday : So this morning , as if to confirm our speculation of what comes next , Cleveland Fed president Loretta Mester delivered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ titled “ Payments and the Pandemic “ , in which after going through the big picture boilerplate , Mester goes straight to the matter at hand .
In the section titled “ Central Bank Digital Currencies ” , the Cleveland Fed president writes that “ the experience with pandemic emergency payments has brought forward an idea that was already gaining increased attention at central banks around the world , that is , central bank digital currency ( CBDC ) .
” And in the shocking punchline , then goes on to reveal that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have an account at the Fed in which digital dollars could be deposited , as liabilities of the Federal Reserve Banks , which could be used for emergency payments .
” But wait it gets better , because in launching digital cash , the Fed would then be able to scrap “ anonymous ” physical currency entirely , and track every single banknote from its “ creation ” all though the various transactions that take place during its lifetime .
And , eventually , the Fed could remotely “ destroy ” said digital @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and in the process the Fed would effectively disintermediate commercial banks , as it would both provide loans to US consumers and directly deposit funds into their accounts , effectively making the entire traditional banking system obsolete .
Here are the details : Other proposals would create a new payments instrument , digital cash , which would be just like the physical currency issued by central banks today , but in a digital form and , potentially , without the anonymity of physical currency .
Depending on how these currencies are designed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the need for commercial bank involvement via direct issuance into the end-users ’ digital wallets combined with central-bank-facilitated transfer and redemption services .
The demand for and use of such instruments need further consideration in order to evaluate whether such a central bank digital currency would allow for quicker and more ubiquitous payments in times of emergency and more generally .
In addition , a range of potential risks and policy issues surrounding central bank digital currency need to be better understood , and the costs and benefits evaluated .
The Federal Reserve @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bank digital currency for some time .
The Board of Governors has a technology lab that has been building and testing a range of distributed ledger platforms to understand their potential benefits and tradeoffs .
Staff members from several Reserve Banks , including Cleveland Fed software developers , are contributing to this effort .
The Federal Reserve Bank of Boston is also engaged in a multiyear effort , working with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology , to experiment with technologies that could be used for a central bank digital currency .
The Federal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an innovation center , in partnership with the Bank for International Settlements , to identify and develop in-depth insights into critical trends and financial technology of relevance to central banks .
Experimentation like this is an important ingredient in assessing the benefits and costs of a central bank digital currency , but does not signal any decision by the Federal Reserve to adopt such a currency .
Issues raised by central bank digital currency related to financial stability , market structure , security , privacy , and monetary policy all need to be @ @ @

In short, ever since the Fed launched QE and NIRP, it has been making the situation it has been trying to “fix” even worse while blowing the biggest asset price bubble in history.
And having recently accepted that its preferred stimulus pathway has failed to boost the broader economy, the blame has fallen on how monetary policy is intermediated, specifically the way the Fed creates excess reserves which end up at commercial banks instead of “tricking down” all the way to the consumer level.
To be sure, in the aftermath of the covid pandemic shutdowns the Fed has tried to short-circuit this process, and in conjunction with the Treasury it has launched “helicopter money” which has resulted in a direct transfer of funds to US corporations via PPP loans, as well as to end consumers via the emergency $600 weekly unemployment benefits which however are set to expire unless renewed by Congress as explained last week, as Democrats and Republicans feud over which fiscal stimulus will be implemented next.
And yet, the lament is that even as the economy was desperately in need of a massive liquidity tsunami, the funds created by the Fed and Treasury (now that the US operates under a quasi-MMT regime) did not make their way to those who need them the most: end consumers.
Which is why we read with great interest a Bloomberg interview with two former Fed officials: Simon Potter, who led the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s markets group i.e., he was the head of the Fed’s Plunge Protection Team for years, and Julia Coronado, who spent eight years as an economist for the Fed’s Board of Governors, who are among the innovators brainstorming solutions to what has emerged as the most crucial and difficult problem facing the Fed: get money swiftly to people who need it most in a crisis.
The response was striking: the two propose creating a monetary tool that they call recession insurance bonds, which draw on some of the advances in digital payments, which will be wired instantly to Americans.
As Coronado explained the details, Congress would grant the Federal Reserve an additional tool for providing support—say, a percent of GDP [in a lump sum that would be divided equally and distributed] to households in a recession. Recession insurance bonds would be zero-coupon securities, a contingent asset of households that would basically lie in wait. The trigger could be reaching the zero lower bound on interest rates or, as economist Claudia Sahm has proposed, a 0.5 percentage point increase in the unemployment rate. The Fed would then activate the securities and deposit the funds digitally in households’ apps .
As Potter added, “it took Congress too long to get money to people, and it’s too clunky. We need a separate infrastructure. The Fed could buy the bonds quickly without going to the private market. On March 15 they could have said interest rates are now at zero, we’re activating X amount of the bonds, and we’ll be tracking the unemployment rate—if it increases above this level, we’ll buy more. The bonds will be on the asset side of the Fed’s balance sheet; the digital dollars in people’s accounts will be on the liability side.”
Essentially, the Fed is proposing creating a hybrid digital legal tender unlike reserves which are stuck within the financial system, and which it can deposit directly into US consumer accounts. In short, as we summarized “The Fed Is Planning To Send Money Directly To Americans In The Next Crisis“, something we reminded readers of on Monday:
So this morning, as if to confirm our speculation of what comes next, Cleveland Fed president Loretta Mester delivered a speech to the Chicago Payment Symposium titled “Payments and the Pandemic“, in which after going through the big picture boilerplate, Mester goes straight to the matter at hand.
In the section titled “Central Bank Digital Currencies”, the Cleveland Fed president writes that “the experience with pandemic emergency payments has brought forward an idea that was already gaining increased attention at central banks around the world, that is, central bank digital currency (CBDC).”
And in the shocking punchline, then goes on to reveal that “ legislation has proposed that each American have an account at the Fed in which digital dollars could be deposited, as liabilities of the Federal Reserve Banks, which could be used for emergency payments. ”
But wait it gets better, because in launching digital cash, the Fed would then be able to scrap “anonymous” physical currency entirely, and track every single banknote from its “creation” all though the various transactions that take place during its lifetime. And, eventually, the Fed could remotely “destroy” said digital currency when it so decides. Oh, and in the process the Fed would effectively disintermediate commercial banks, as it would both provide loans to US consumers and directly deposit funds into their accounts, effectively making the entire traditional banking system obsolete. Here are the details:


healthimpactnews--2020-09-25--Who Will Stand Up for Women’s Health?

Who Will Stand Up for Women’s Health?

Who Will Stand Up for Women ’ s Health ?
An update on our efforts to protect consumer access to compounded bioidentical hormones , including estriol .
Action Alert !
As regular readers will be aware , the FDA is poised to eliminate consumer access to compounded bioidentical hormones like estriol , progesterone , testosterone , and others .
We ’ re working with our allies to mobilize members of Congress to take action on this critical women ’ s health issue .
We need your help to get as many members to support our cause as we possibly can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Phil Roe ( R-TN ) are leading a Congressional letter asking the FDA to “ consider the severely negative impact some of [ the National Academies of Sciences , Engineering , and Medicine ’ s ] recommendations would have on patients , ” and requesting that consumer access to compounded bioidentical hormones be maintained .
To briefly recap how we got here : estriol and other hormones were nominated to the FDA ’ s Demonstrably Difficult to Compound List .
Items that appear on the final list will be barred from pharmacy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that the FDA had previously attacked estriol in 2008 , but was beaten back on account of ANH member activism .
After initial pushback from the natural health community against the latest attack , the agency asked the National Academies of Sciences , Engineering , and Medicine ( NASEM ) to impartially evaluate the “ clinical utility ” of using compounded bioidentical hormones to treat patients .
NASEM ’ s evaluation report , which was heavily slanted against compounded bioidentical hormones , was released in late July of this year ( read our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ say , in our view , the FDA carefully managed this process to achieve an intended result : eliminating access to compounded bioidentical hormones to create a monopoly for FDA-approved hormones .
With an “ impartial ” report from the “ experts ” at NASEM , the FDA has given itself cover to ban compounded BHRT .
This is a critical issue , particularly for women .
Many studies have shown that estriol offers many potential health benefits—for urinary tract and bone health , for example—without some of the dangers that accompany higher-potency @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ban would cause suffering for many , many women .
But as we ’ ve written before , this is one among many attacks that , in our opinion , is meant to make it impossible for traditional compounding pharmacies to stay in business .
The FDA still needs to go through the normal rulemaking process before estriol or other hormones are banned from compounding , but the time to act is now .
We must get Congress on our side to try to reign in this agency .
Attacking estriol and compounded @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hormone drugs is just one of the ways the FDA and the federal government bolster drug monopolies and undermine natural health options .
Our crony healthcare system bars not only the use , but even the mention , of natural remedies like vitamin D that have not been , and never can be , put through the multi-billion dollar FDA approval process , because as natural substances they can not be fully patented .
Until this system changes , we will remain a nation of sick people paying way too much for healthcare @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Write to Congress and urge your elected officials to support the letter asking the FDA to protect consumer access to compounded bioidentical hormones .
Please send your message immediately .
By sending this message , you will also be supporting our petition to ungag doctors so that they can share with patients the benefits of supplements and natural treatments for COVID .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

Who Will Stand Up for Women’s Health?
by Alliance for Natural Health
An update on our efforts to protect consumer access to compounded bioidentical hormones, including estriol. Action Alert!
As regular readers will be aware, the FDA is poised to eliminate consumer access to compounded bioidentical hormones like estriol, progesterone, testosterone, and others. We’re working with our allies to mobilize members of Congress to take action on this critical women’s health issue. We need your help to get as many members to support our cause as we possibly can.
Representatives Mark Pocan (D-WI) and Phil Roe (R-TN) are leading a Congressional letter asking the FDA to “consider the severely negative impact some of [the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine’s] recommendations would have on patients,” and requesting that consumer access to compounded bioidentical hormones be maintained.
To briefly recap how we got here: estriol and other hormones were nominated to the FDA’s Demonstrably Difficult to Compound List. Items that appear on the final list will be barred from pharmacy compounding. This was particularly concerning given that the FDA had previously attacked estriol in 2008, but was beaten back on account of ANH member activism. After initial pushback from the natural health community against the latest attack, the agency asked the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) to impartially evaluate the “clinical utility” of using compounded bioidentical hormones to treat patients. NASEM’s evaluation report, which was heavily slanted against compounded bioidentical hormones, was released in late July of this year (read our analysis here).
Suffice it to say, in our view, the FDA carefully managed this process to achieve an intended result: eliminating access to compounded bioidentical hormones to create a monopoly for FDA-approved hormones. With an “impartial” report from the “experts” at NASEM, the FDA has given itself cover to ban compounded BHRT.
This is a critical issue, particularly for women. Many studies have shown that estriol offers many potential health benefits—for urinary tract and bone health, for example—without some of the dangers that accompany higher-potency estrogens, such as cancer. A ban would cause suffering for many, many women. But as we’ve written before, this is one among many attacks that, in our opinion, is meant to make it impossible for traditional compounding pharmacies to stay in business.
The FDA still needs to go through the normal rulemaking process before estriol or other hormones are banned from compounding, but the time to act is now. We must get Congress on our side to try to reign in this agency.
Attacking estriol and compounded hormones to clear the market for FDA-approved hormone drugs is just one of the ways the FDA and the federal government bolster drug monopolies and undermine natural health options. Our crony healthcare system bars not only the use, but even the mention, of natural remedies like vitamin D that have not been, and never can be, put through the multi-billion dollar FDA approval process, because as natural substances they cannot be fully patented. Until this system changes, we will remain a nation of sick people paying way too much for healthcare that is ineffective.
Action Alert! Write to Congress and urge your elected officials to support the letter asking the FDA to protect consumer access to compounded bioidentical hormones. Please send your message immediately. By sending this message, you will also be supporting our petition to ungag doctors so that they can share with patients the benefits of supplements and natural treatments for COVID.
Read the full article at ANH-USA.org.
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-09-25--Placer County California Reopens Businesses, Schools, Churches in Defiance of Gov. Newsom, and COVID

Placer County California Reopens Businesses, Schools, Churches in Defiance of Gov. Newsom, and COVID Incidents Decrease – Model for Rest of California?

Kirk Uhler is the elected County Supervisor for the 4th District in Placer County , California .
Placer County made news earlier this month ( September , 2020 ) when the Board of Supervisors voted to remove all the COVID pandemic measures , allowing businesses , schools , and churches to re-open , risking losing state funding for defying Governor Newsom .
As can be expected , Big Pharma interests kicked into high gear to protest the County ’ s actions .
Placer County Health Officer and Public Health Director , Dr Aimee Sisson , for example , resigned from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Facebook video this week exposing the lies in a Sacramento Bee ’ s article that blamed the unanimous Board resolution on “ anti-vaxxers.
” In Uhler ’ s video , he shows how New COVID cases , county residents hospitalized , positive test results , and cases per 100,000 have all dramatically DECREASED since the Board passed their resolution , which of course should silence all of their critics , except that those who want to continue “ emergency ” dictates indefinitely really do not care about statistics , or the truth .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ suit , and put the health and lives of their constituents as first priority over the tyrannical State Government ’ s desire to continue destroying the economy of California , and any potential loss of COVID funding ( which can be challenged in court as well ) .
Watch Mr. Uhler ’ s full video .
If it disappears , let us know and we will provide it from a different platform .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Kirk Uhler is the elected County Supervisor for the 4th District in Placer County, California.
Placer County made news earlier this month (September, 2020) when the Board of Supervisors voted to remove all the COVID pandemic measures, allowing businesses, schools, and churches to re-open, risking losing state funding for defying Governor Newsom.
As can be expected, Big Pharma interests kicked into high gear to protest the County’s actions. Placer County Health Officer and Public Health Director, Dr Aimee Sisson, for example, resigned from her position.
Kirk Uhler streamed a Facebook video this week exposing the lies in a Sacramento Bee’s article that blamed the unanimous Board resolution on “anti-vaxxers.”
In Uhler’s video, he shows how New COVID cases, county residents hospitalized, positive test results, and cases per 100,000 have all dramatically DECREASED since the Board passed their resolution, which of course should silence all of their critics, except that those who want to continue “emergency” dictates indefinitely really do not care about statistics, or the truth.
Other counties throughout California should now follow suit, and put the health and lives of their constituents as first priority over the tyrannical State Government’s desire to continue destroying the economy of California, and any potential loss of COVID funding (which can be challenged in court as well).
Watch Mr. Uhler’s full video. If it disappears, you can watch it on our Bitchute channel.
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-09-27--The American Dream was Always a Lie – The Path of Christ is a Lonely, Difficult One

Note : This is an article under our Created4Health topic , which has been a topic area of Health Impact News since its inception .
It is free of charge , it has NOTHING to do with religion , and you are free to not read it .
Emailing me and complaining about it will be a waste of your time , as I don ’ t have the time to answer complaints over a newsletter that is free of charge .
When the apostle Paul wrote the above statement , he had been stoned to death .
Or least @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Like Jesus before him , Paul was upsetting the ruling class that controlled the local politics and the economy , by preaching that one could have direct faith in God through his Son , Jesus Christ , apart from religion and the religious rulers .
It was a message that empowered the common person .
It was the message of the Kingdom of God that Jesus preached .
Jesus made it clear that very few , if any , of the rich , ruling class , would be able to enter the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ class Jesus said : Satan is the ruler of the World System , but Jesus is the ruler of the Kingdom of God , which , for now , exists on earth in the lives of his true believers , until he returns to set up his physical Kingdom .
Once , having been asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God would come , Jesus replied , “ The kingdom of God does not come with your careful observation , nor will people say , ‘ Here it is , ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ because the kingdom of God is within you.
” Then he said to his disciples , “ The time is coming when you will long to see one of the days of the Son of Man , but you will not see it .
Men will tell you , ‘ There he is !
’ or ‘ Here he is !
’ Do not go running off after them .
For the Son of Man in his day will be like the lightning , which flashes and lights up the sky from one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he must suffer many things and be rejected by this generation .
“ Just as it was in the days of Noah , so also will it be in the days of the Son of Man .
People were eating , drinking , marrying and being given in marriage up to the day Noah entered the ark .
Then the flood came and destroyed them all .
“ It was the same in the days of Lot .
People were eating and drinking , buying and selling , planting and building .
But @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and sulfur rained down from heaven and destroyed them all .
“ It will be just like this on the day the Son of Man is revealed .
On that day no one who is on the roof of his house , with his goods inside , should go down to get them .
Likewise , no one in the field should go back for anything .
Remember Lot ’ s wife !
Whoever tries to keep his life will lose it , and whoever loses his life will preserve it .
I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people will be in one bed ; one will be taken and the other left .
Two women will be grinding grain together ; one will be taken and the other left.
” ( Luke 17:20-35 ) To be a true disciple , a true believer in Jesus , is to NOT value this life , but to look forward to the one to come , where Jesus will rule as King in the Kingdom of God in a REAL New World Order .
And until that time , there is no “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at all for this life – only the way of Jesus , who himself proclaimed : “ I am the way and the truth and the life .
No one comes to the Father except through me.
” ( John 14:6 ) Those of us who have been raised in the United States of America have been brainwashed for most of our lives .
We have been taught that we are a “ special people , ” better than other nations , and that our founders were all righteous , Godly men , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ But as I have said on many occasions , the biggest lie that Satan sows is the one mixed with truth .
The more truth to overcome the lie , the more damaging the false belief .
America is not special .
America has at times in its short history been blessed by God , but not because we are special .
There was only one favored nation at any point in human history , and that was the nation that was delivered from the oppression of slavery in Egypt , where God @ @ @ @ @ @ @ promised land .
Did God bless them because they were better than the other nations around them ?
No !
In fact , God had to wait for a whole generation to die off while living under difficult circumstances in the desert , so evil and corrupt they had become while living in Egypt .
And according to Moses , who led them to the “ Promised Land , ” their children who eventually did enter the promised land were no more righteous than their parents .
God used that nation for his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ period , and it is the subject of a whole different article .
But the myth of the American Dream is now quickly falling apart as the Globalists quickly move to completely destroy it .
And we deserve it .
Only by repenting of our sins , and begging for God ’ s mercy , can anything positive arise from the ashes of what is about to come .
But the truth is , this is how it has ALWAYS been throughout human history .
The way to God , the way to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , is a path of suffering , humiliation and shame .
It is the same path Jesus walked when he took on human form and came to live a human life within the flow of human history .
It is a way that led to Jesus ’ own death , a necessary , sacrificial death to save the world .
We are now called to follow the same path , the narrow path that may also lead to our physical death , as we look to the better life that is yet to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recorded in the Scriptures all walked the same path of loneliness and suffering .
Quite a different picture than the picture of the “ American dream , ” isn ’ t it ?
Since the end of WWII and the beginning of the “ Industrial age ” and now the “ technological age , ” the myth that has been perpetrated through the invention of television and their programming and the American propaganda educational system , is that the American dream is real , and obtainable by anyone .
And that the enemies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other nations who are jealous of our “ freedom ” and therefore hate us .
Bull crap !
This is , and always has been , a lie straight from the pits of hell , and the father of lies , Satan .
America is not the promised land .
America is dead .
Judgement is coming , whether you are ready for it or not .
So , as the Holy Spirit says : “ Today , if you hear his voice , do not harden your hearts as you did in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ testing in the desert , where your fathers tested and tried me and for forty years saw what I did .
That is why I was angry with that generation , and I said , ‘ Their hearts are always going astray , and they have not known my ways.
’ So I declared on oath in my anger , “ They shall never enter my rest . '
” See to it , brothers , that none of you has a sinful , unbelieving heart that turns away from the living God @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as long as it is called Today , so that none of you may be hardened by sin ’ s deceitfulness .
We have come to share in Christ if we hold firmly till the end the confidence we had at first .
As has just been said : “ Today , if you hear his voice , do not harden your hearts as you did in the rebellion.
” Who were they who heard and rebelled ?
Were they not all those Moses led out of Egypt ?
And with whom was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it not with those who sinned , whose bodies fell in the desert ?
And to whom did God swear that they would never enter his rest if not to those who disobeyed ?
So we see that they were not able to enter , because of their unbelief .
Therefore , since the promise of entering his rest still stands , let us be careful that none of you be found to have fallen short of it .
( Hebrews 3:7-19 ) Comment on this article at Created4Health.org Having problems receiving our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

Note: This is an article under our Created4Health topic, which has been a topic area of Health Impact News since its inception.
It is free of charge, it has NOTHING to do with religion, and you are free to not read it. Emailing me and complaining about it will be a waste of your time, as I don’t have the time to answer complaints over a newsletter that is free of charge.
by Brian Shilhavy
“We must go through many hardships to enter the kingdom of God.” (Acts 14:22)
When the apostle Paul wrote the above statement, he had been stoned to death. Or at least, that is what his enemies thought.
Then some Jews came from Antioch and Iconium and won the crowd over. They stoned Paul and dragged him outside the city, thinking he was dead. But after the disciples had gathered around him, he got up and went back into the city. The next day he and Barnabas left for Derbe. They preached the good news in that city and won a large number of disciples. Then they returned to Lystra, Iconium and Antioch, strengthening the disciples and encouraging them to remain true to the faith. “We must go through many hardships to enter the kingdom of God,” they said. (Acts 14:19-22)
Like Jesus before him, Paul was upsetting the ruling class that controlled the local politics and the economy, by preaching that one could have direct faith in God through his Son, Jesus Christ, apart from religion and the religious rulers.
It was a message that empowered the common person. It was the message of the Kingdom of God that Jesus preached.
Looking at his disciples, he said: “Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God. Blessed are you who hunger now, for you will be satisfied. Blessed are you who weep now, for you will laugh. Blessed are you when men hate you, when they exclude you and insult you and reject your name as evil, because of the Son of Man. “Rejoice in that day and leap for joy, because great is your reward in heaven.” (Luke 6:20-23)
Jesus made it clear that very few, if any, of the rich, ruling class, would be able to enter the Kingdom of God.
Jesus looked at him and said, “How hard it is for the rich to enter the kingdom of God! Indeed, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.” Those who heard this asked, “Who then can be saved?” Jesus replied, “What is impossible with men is possible with God.” Peter said to him, “We have left all we had to follow you!” “I tell you the truth,” Jesus said to them, “no one who has left home or wife or brothers or parents or children for the sake of the kingdom of God will fail to receive many times as much in this age and, in the age to come, eternal life.” (Luke 18:24-30)
To the ruling class Jesus said:
“Have you never read in the Scriptures: ‘The stone the builders rejected has become the capstone; the Lord has done this, and it is marvelous in our eyes’? Therefore I tell you that the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people who will produce its fruit. He who falls on this stone will be broken to pieces, but he on whom it falls will be crushed.” When the chief priests and the Pharisees heard Jesus’ parables, they knew he was talking about them. (Matthew 21:42-45)
Satan is the ruler of the World System, but Jesus is the ruler of the Kingdom of God, which, for now, exists on earth in the lives of his true believers, until he returns to set up his physical Kingdom.
Once, having been asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God would come, Jesus replied, “The kingdom of God does not come with your careful observation, nor will people say, ‘Here it is,’ or ‘There it is,’ because the kingdom of God is within you.” Then he said to his disciples, “The time is coming when you will long to see one of the days of the Son of Man, but you will not see it. Men will tell you, ‘There he is!’ or ‘Here he is!’ Do not go running off after them. For the Son of Man in his day will be like the lightning, which flashes and lights up the sky from one end to the other. But first he must suffer many things and be rejected by this generation. “Just as it was in the days of Noah, so also will it be in the days of the Son of Man. People were eating, drinking, marrying and being given in marriage up to the day Noah entered the ark. Then the flood came and destroyed them all. “It was the same in the days of Lot. People were eating and drinking, buying and selling, planting and building. But the day Lot left Sodom, fire and sulfur rained down from heaven and destroyed them all. “It will be just like this on the day the Son of Man is revealed. On that day no one who is on the roof of his house, with his goods inside, should go down to get them. Likewise, no one in the field should go back for anything. Remember Lot’s wife! Whoever tries to keep his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life will preserve it. I tell you, on that night two people will be in one bed; one will be taken and the other left. Two women will be grinding grain together; one will be taken and the other left.” (Luke 17:20-35)
To be a true disciple, a true believer in Jesus, is to NOT value this life, but to look forward to the one to come, where Jesus will rule as King in the Kingdom of God in a REAL New World Order.
And until that time, there is no “American Dream.”
There is no dream at all for this life – only the way of Jesus, who himself proclaimed: “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” (John 14:6)
Those of us who have been raised in the United States of America have been brainwashed for most of our lives. We have been taught that we are a “special people,” better than other nations, and that our founders were all righteous, Godly men, seeking a better way of life.
But as I have said on many occasions, the biggest lie that Satan sows is the one mixed with truth. The more truth to overcome the lie, the more damaging the false belief.
America is not special. America has at times in its short history been blessed by God, but not because we are special.
There was only one favored nation at any point in human history, and that was the nation that was delivered from the oppression of slavery in Egypt, where God delivered them and led them to the promised land.
Did God bless them because they were better than the other nations around them?
No! In fact, God had to wait for a whole generation to die off while living under difficult circumstances in the desert, so evil and corrupt they had become while living in Egypt.
And according to Moses, who led them to the “Promised Land,” their children who eventually did enter the promised land were no more righteous than their parents.
Do not say in your heart… “It is because of my righteousness that the LORD has brought me in to possess this land,” whereas it is because of the wickedness of these nations that the LORD is driving them out before you. Not because of your righteousness or the uprightness of your heart are you going in to possess their land, but because of the wickedness of these nations the LORD your God is driving them out from before you, and that he may confirm the word that the LORD swore to your fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob. Know, therefore, that the LORD your God is not giving you this good land to possess because of your righteousness, for you are a stubborn people. (Deuteronomy 9:4-6)
God used that nation for his own purposes, for that specific time period, and it is the subject of a whole different article.
But the myth of the American Dream is now quickly falling apart as the Globalists quickly move to completely destroy it.
And we deserve it. Only by repenting of our sins, and begging for God’s mercy, can anything positive arise from the ashes of what is about to come.
But the truth is, this is how it has ALWAYS been throughout human history.
The way to God, the way to the truth, and to the life, is a path of suffering, humiliation and shame. It is the same path Jesus walked when he took on human form and came to live a human life within the flow of human history.
Then Jesus said to his disciples, “If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me will find it. What good will it be for a man if he gains the whole world, yet forfeits his soul? Or what can a man give in exchange for his soul? For the Son of Man is going to come in his Father’s glory with his angels, and then he will reward each person according to what he has done.” (Matthew 16:24-27)
It is a way that led to Jesus’ own death, a necessary, sacrificial death to save the world.
We are now called to follow the same path, the narrow path that may also lead to our physical death, as we look to the better life that is yet to come.
Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it. (Matthew 7:13-14)
The great people of faith recorded in the Scriptures all walked the same path of loneliness and suffering.
Old Testament believers:
All these people were still living by faith when they died. They did not receive the things promised; they only saw them and welcomed them from a distance. And they admitted that they were aliens and strangers on earth. People who say such things show that they are looking for a country of their own. If they had been thinking of the country they had left, they would have had opportunity to return. Instead, they were longing for a better country—a heavenly one. Therefore God is not ashamed to be called their God, for he has prepared a city for them. (Hebrews 11:13-16)
New Testament believers:
We do not want you to be uninformed, brothers, about the hardships we suffered in the province of Asia. We were under great pressure, far beyond our ability to endure, so that we despaired even of life. Indeed, in our hearts we felt the sentence of death. But this happened that we might not rely on ourselves but on God, who raises the dead. He has delivered us from such a deadly peril, and he will deliver us. On him we have set our hope that he will continue to deliver us. (2 Corinthians 1:8-10) But we have this treasure in jars of clay to show that this all-surpassing power is from God and not from us. We are hard pressed on every side, but not crushed; perplexed, but not in despair; persecuted, but not abandoned; struck down, but not destroyed. We always carry around in our body the death of Jesus, so that the life of Jesus may also be revealed in our body. For we who are alive are always being given over to death for Jesus’ sake, so that his life may be revealed in our mortal body. So then, death is at work in us, but life is at work in you. It is written: “I believed; therefore I have spoken.” With that same spirit of faith we also believe and therefore speak, because we know that the one who raised the Lord Jesus from the dead will also raise us with Jesus and present us with you in his presence. (2 Corinthians 4:7-14)
Quite a different picture than the picture of the “American Dream,” isn’t it?
Since the end of WWII and the beginning of the “Industrial age” and now the “technological age,” the myth that has been perpetrated through the invention of television and their programming and the American propaganda educational system, is that the American dream is real, and obtainable by anyone. And that the enemies of this American way of life are other nations who are jealous of our “freedom” and therefore hate us.
Bull crap! This is, and always has been, a lie straight from the pits of hell, and the father of lies, Satan.
America is not the promised land. America is dead.
Judgement is coming, whether you are ready for it or not.
So, as the Holy Spirit says: “Today, if you hear his voice, do not harden your hearts as you did in the rebellion, during the time of testing in the desert, where your fathers tested and tried me and for forty years saw what I did. That is why I was angry with that generation, and I said, ‘Their hearts are always going astray, and they have not known my ways.’ So I declared on oath in my anger, “They shall never enter my rest.'” See to it, brothers, that none of you has a sinful, unbelieving heart that turns away from the living God. But encourage one another daily, as long as it is called Today, so that none of you may be hardened by sin’s deceitfulness. We have come to share in Christ if we hold firmly till the end the confidence we had at first. As has just been said: “Today, if you hear his voice, do not harden your hearts as you did in the rebellion.” Who were they who heard and rebelled? Were they not all those Moses led out of Egypt? And with whom was he angry for forty years? Was it not with those who sinned, whose bodies fell in the desert? And to whom did God swear that they would never enter his rest if not to those who disobeyed? So we see that they were not able to enter, because of their unbelief. Therefore, since the promise of entering his rest still stands, let us be careful that none of you be found to have fallen short of it. (Hebrews 3:7-19)
Comment on this article at Created4Health.org
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-09-27--Prominent Medical Doctor Arrested in London Protests: “What Kind of a Country Have We Become?”

Protesters in Trafalgar Square , London were standing up for freedom of expression and human rights .
Heiko Schöning , MD a prominent German medical doctor who heads Doctors For Truth , an organization of more than a thousand doctors who oppose government fearmongering , was arrested in Trafalgar Square , London for speaking against draconian government measures .
He noted that the people in Germany know , from their Nazi history where government restrictions on personal freedom and medical dictates lead .
In June , Facebook censored a video presentation by Dr. Schöning in which he stated that : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Ex-Supreme Court judge LORD SUMPTION , has written a scathing critique of calamatous government directives in response to the Covid-19 virus .
“ We are witnessing the slow demise of one of the great conceits of the modern world : the notion that the big-hearted State can protect us against every misfortune and that human beings are mere tools of State policy to be pushed about like pawns on a chessboard according to the changing impulses of its ministers .
The attempt to control the spread of Covid-19 by coercion has failed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It has failed throughout Europe and North America .
It has failed in Israel .
It has failed in Australia .
The measures which these countries have taken have varied in their severity , but not in their outcome.
” He identifies the reason that aggressive social distancing failed : Principally , they conflict with the most basic instincts of humanity .
We are social animals .
The attempt to control the spread of Covid-19 by coercion has failed .
It has failed in Britain .
It has failed throughout Europe and North @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
It has failed in Australia .
The measures which these countries have taken have varied in their severity , but not in their outcome .
Our instincts and our culture are based on interconnections with other humans .
The whole organisation of our lives , in cities , workplaces , schools and families depends on physical proximity .
With a few exceptions ( such as those living in multi-generational households ) , they can shelter themselves if they wish .
Many of them will prefer to take the risk .
Those who @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rationally prefer quality of life to quantity .
They may prefer to hug their grandchildren than to treat them as angels of death .
Why should they not be allowed to make that choice for themselves , instead of having some distant minister make it for them ?
Lord Sumption notes that in March the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies ( SAGE ) made three reasonable recommendations , but the government failed to follow these and instead issued arbitrary , irrational directives : lockdown , masks , and social distancing : • Citizens @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of taking decisions for thermselves and managing personal risk .
• Only the old , over 70 , and those who are clinically vulnerable are at risk .
Therefore there is no justification for restricting the entire population .
• Aggressive lockdowns and social distancing measures would have little effect in the long term .
They merely push transmission to the period when these measures are lifted .
…we are told that they will lock us down if we not do the Government ’ s bidding and possibly even if we do .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the discretion of any policeman in the land .
We are advised to inform on our neighbours .
In Scotland , students are ordered in strident tones not to go to pubs or socialise , and in England we are told that they might not be allowed home for Christmas.
” What kind of country have we become where arrogant bullying of this kind is regarded as a proper function of ministers ?
We now learn that the Government expects current restrictions to last six months .
Until what ?
Until the virus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ effective vaccine , whenever that may be ?
Until the next ill-considered idea for reordering our lives ?
What is the plan , now that the risk of overwhelming the NHS has subsided ?
Where is the exit route ?
Read the full article : What kind of a country have we become when arrogant bullying is seen as the proper function of Ministers ?
Another critique is by veteran journalist , Peter Hitchens , who compares the lockdown to burning the house down to get rid of a wasps ’ nest .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ him , flew off as soon as they felt the heat .
But the house is gone .
Now he stands by the smouldering ruins , blaming everyone but himself for this futile catastrophe .
I suspect that some of the things he said on Tuesday night will bring him down , especially the outrageous threat to use troops .
If we have been as well-behaved as he pretends to believe , how can such things be justified ?
A large part of the crazy , unenforceable tangle of new regulations seemed to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spreads only when you are standing up .
Millions of eyes opened to the discovery some of us made long ago – that anti-social distancing rules are not based on serious research , but on random guesswork and a desire to frighten us all into doing anything they tell us… The words ‘ We must learn to live without fear ’ demand a complete U-turn from a Cabinet that has distilled power out of fear for six disastrous months – and used that power to smash up the wealth of centuries .
Has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a government that destroyed so many livelihoods on purpose ?
People wrongly think the phrase ‘ herd immunity ’ sounds cruel ( It is not .
It has been used for decades , by vaccination experts .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

Mass Protests in London Against 2nd Lockdown, mandatory vaccination & face masks
by Vera Sharav
Alliance for Human Research Protection
Protesters in Trafalgar Square, London were standing up for freedom of expression and human rights.
Heiko Schöning, MD a prominent German medical doctor who heads Doctors For Truth, an organization of more than a thousand doctors who oppose government fearmongering, was arrested in Trafalgar Square, London for speaking against draconian government measures. He noted that the people in Germany know, from their Nazi history where government restrictions on personal freedom and medical dictates lead.
In June, Facebook censored a video presentation by Dr. Schöning in which he stated that:
“the corona is just a type of flu that occurs at a certain time each year, and the strict measures that have been introduced, allegedly have nothing to do with the virus but only caused panic. The corona panic is a simple deception, mafia trick and crime.”
Contrasting the increasingly oppressive UK government measures, Ex-Supreme Court judge LORD SUMPTION, has written a scathing critique of calamatous government directives in response to the Covid-19 virus.
“We are witnessing the slow demise of one of the great conceits of the modern world: the notion that the big-hearted State can protect us against every misfortune and that human beings are mere tools of State policy to be pushed about like pawns on a chessboard according to the changing impulses of its ministers. The attempt to control the spread of Covid-19 by coercion has failed. It has failed in Britain. It has failed throughout Europe and North America. It has failed in Israel. It has failed in Australia. The measures which these countries have taken have varied in their severity, but not in their outcome.”
He identifies the reason that aggressive social distancing failed:
Principally, they conflict with the most basic instincts of humanity. We are social animals. The attempt to control the spread of Covid-19 by coercion has failed. It has failed in Britain. It has failed throughout Europe and North America. It has failed in Israel. It has failed in Australia. The measures which these countries have taken have varied in their severity, but not in their outcome. Our instincts and our culture are based on interconnections with other humans. The whole organisation of our lives, in cities, workplaces, schools and families depends on physical proximity. With a few exceptions (such as those living in multi-generational households), they can shelter themselves if they wish. Many of them will prefer to take the risk. Those who have less time remaining to them may rationally prefer quality of life to quantity. They may prefer to hug their grandchildren than to treat them as angels of death. Why should they not be allowed to make that choice for themselves, instead of having some distant minister make it for them?
Lord Sumption notes that in March the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) made three reasonable recommendations, but the government failed to follow these and instead issued arbitrary, irrational directives: lockdown, masks, and social distancing:
Citizens should be treated as rational, capable of taking decisions for themselves and managing personal risk. Only the old, over 70, and those who are clinically vulnerable are at risk. Therefore there is no justification for restricting the entire population. Aggressive lockdowns and social distancing measures would have little effect in the long term. They merely push transmission to the period when these measures are lifted.
…we are told that they will lock us down if we not do the Government’s bidding and possibly even if we do. We are menaced with £10,000 fines at the discretion of any policeman in the land. We are advised to inform on our neighbours. In Scotland, students are ordered in strident tones not to go to pubs or socialise, and in England we are told that they might not be allowed home for Christmas.” What kind of country have we become where arrogant bullying of this kind is regarded as a proper function of ministers? We now learn that the Government expects current restrictions to last six months. Until what? Until the virus obligingly departs? Until there is an effective vaccine, whenever that may be? Until the next ill-considered idea for reordering our lives? What is the plan, now that the risk of overwhelming the NHS has subsided? Where is the exit route?
Read the full article: What kind of a country have we become when arrogant bullying is seen as the proper function of Ministers?
Another critique is by veteran journalist, Peter Hitchens, who compares the lockdown to burning the house down to get rid of a wasps’ nest.
The wasps, having more sense than him, flew off as soon as they felt the heat. But the house is gone. Now he stands by the smouldering ruins, blaming everyone but himself for this futile catastrophe. I suspect that some of the things he said on Tuesday night will bring him down, especially the outrageous threat to use troops. If we have been as well-behaved as he pretends to believe, how can such things be justified? A large part of the crazy, unenforceable tangle of new regulations seemed to be based on the belief that Covid spreads only when you are standing up. Millions of eyes opened to the discovery some of us made long ago – that anti-social distancing rules are not based on serious research, but on random guesswork and a desire to frighten us all into doing anything they tell us… The words ‘We must learn to live without fear’ demand a complete U-turn from a Cabinet that has distilled power out of fear for six disastrous months – and used that power to smash up the wealth of centuries. Has there ever before been in this country a government that destroyed so many livelihoods on purpose? People wrongly think the phrase ‘herd immunity’ sounds cruel (It is not. It has been used for decades, by vaccination experts.
Read the article here.
Source: Alliance for Human Research Protection
See Also: