healthimpactnews--2020-05-05--Not a Single COVID-19 Test is FDA Approved – Do We Really Know Who has COVID-19 and Who Does Not?

We are witnessing one of the most extraordinary events in human history , and certainly the most far-reaching and impactful event in all of our lifetimes , because of the effects of what we are being told is a single coronavirus .
Here at Health Impact News , as always , we have endeavored to publish the truth about this pandemic , even if the truth is not popular or censored in the corporate-funded “ mainstream ” media .
This article being published today , on May 5 , 2020 , might be the most significant article about COVID-19 that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ date .
The rationale for the extraordinary events we are seeing today all come down to one dataset : the amount of people infected with this coronavirus , and the rate at which people are dying from it .
This can only be justified by one simple fact : that we know how to identify and test for this single virus .
If this single fact can not be proven , or if it is proven to be false , and we really do not have the means to accurately test for this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as a direct result of trusting the data that this test is based upon , has been built on a faulty foundation that does not exist .
Does this sound like a conspiracy theory ?
Because if you dare to ask the question , that is what you will be accused of for daring to question the accuracy of the tests , and therefore the accuracy of the data that these tests allegedly prove .
So let ’ s start with the facts that most everyone agrees upon , or that can be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The FDA has NOT Approved a Single Test for COVID-19 This was brought to my attention recently by someone who contacted me who has 43 years of clinical diagnostics experience .
In addition to being a Med Tech at one of the New York City metropolitan area ’ s largest reference laboratories , this person spent 25 years of that 43 working for medical device manufacturers as a biomedical field service engineer and technical consultant .
They installed , repaired , troubleshot and validated laboratory instrumentation .
This person wishes to remain anonymous @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Since the beginning of the OCVID-19 “ Pandemic ” , much of government and the media ’ s focus have been on the need for more testing .
The purpose of this brief article is to examine the FDA ’ s Emergency Use Authorization ( EUA ) and the effect these authorizations have on the reliability of test results in identifying positive/negative samples for COVID-19 .
The key word in this statement is “ unapproved.
” Medical device manufacturing is one of most highly regulated industries in the US .
The FDA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ years .
To date there are no COVID-19 diagnostic tests being used that have completed a full FDA approval process .
The reason they have not received FDA approval is because the safety and effectiveness of the product has not been proven .
Many of these tests have been developed at least since the SARS outbreak of 2000-2004 .
Refer to the above FDA website video explaining the EUA process .
Pay particular attention to the statement : In reviewing the list of In Vitro Diagnostics products on the FDA website that have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is contradicting its own claim and is authorizing the use of diagnostics tests that produce false results .
There is a very easy way to confirm this statement , if you know where to look .
From the list of In Vitro Diagnostic products that have received a EUA , select any manufacturer .
Go to that manufacturer ’ s website .
Select the test from the products listing .
Look for the “ package insert ” .
The package insert explains everything you need to know about the test , including its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ results .
Using the ROCHE cobas® SARS-CoV-2 test from the list , go to the Roche website and read the emergency use statement : The media has also been reporting a shortage of COVID-19 test kits .
The CDC has made recommendations on prioritizing patients based on need .
The media makes it appear that anyone can get a nasal swab and get tested .
All you need is the result from that swab and you can find out if you are positive or negative for COVID-19 as this Fox News Report implies @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This article by ARUP Laboratories : “ How Accurate Are COVID-19 Tests ?
Many Factors Can Affect Sensitivity , Specificity of Test Results ” explains .
Due to internet censorship , articles on research that don ’ t conform to the current narrative are difficult to find but not impossible .
The individual research papers are available by accessing the provided links .
The samples that were tested as part of these research papers were performed in a closed environment , meaning , collection , testing and results interpretations were all done on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the validity of test samples that are collected at one location , sent to a local health department , because of insufficient testing capabilities , sent to reference lab and from there sent to an affiliate lab location ?
The CDC website has guidelines here .
In summary , the Government and the Media used fictional statistics on the severity of the COVID-19 “ pandemic ” to instill fear in the US population , shut down entire industries and trash a thriving economy .
State ’ s Governors forced draconian “ shelter in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to “ flatten the curve.
” These same Governors are now claiming the need for mass , unproven antibody testing , those tests receiving FDA EUA , before States can “ safely ” open up again .
At least there is more reporting on the fallacies of antibody testing then there is on the testing for COVID itself .
Dr. Fauci is already warning of a COVID-19 resurgence this fall .
FACT # 2 : The Drug Companies Themselves are Arguing Over Which Tests are Accurate and Which Ones Are Not We covered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CEO : COVID19 Tests “ Not Worth Anything – Two of us could do it Overnight in the Garage ” FACT # 3 : “ Official ” Statistics on COVID-19 Deaths Vary Widely Depending on Who You Trust The corporate media presents daily updates on COVID-19 deaths as if it they were universally accepted as accurate .
But did you know that as of this past weekend , the media ’ s statistics for COVID-19 deaths were more than 29,000 HIGHER than what the U.S. CDC was reporting ?
The media is NOT @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
They are mainly using statistics from a website called Worldometer .
The number of deaths being reported at the Worldometer website have consistently run about 60 % higher than what the CDC website has been publishing .
And as we have previously reported , many doctors and others have come forward to explain that the CDC guidelines for reporting CDC deaths is very liberal , because almost anyone coming into the hospitals right now is automatically counted as COVID-19 patients , and even if they had pre-existing conditions such as heart disease @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as COVID-19 deaths .
So the CDC numbers are admittedly high .
See : COVID19 Death Certificates are Being Manipulated According to Montana Physician with 30 Years Experience Minnesota Doctor and Senator Speaks Out on Fox News Regarding Coronavirus “ Padded ” Death Statistics for Financial Gain Funeral Directors in COVID-19 Epicenter Doubt Legitimacy of Deaths Attributed to Pandemic According to the CDC , COVID-19 deaths reached a peak the week of April 18th .
But according the media , deaths are still increasing and have not even peaked yet , based on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Worldometer website , which has deaths almost twice as high as the CDC ’ s padded numbers , and these numbers are the ones being used to instill fear into the American public .
The answer to the question as to who operates the Worldometer website , the website that almost the entire corporate media ( and some in the Alternative Media as well ) is publishing as fact , seems to be shrouded in mystery .
The Worldometer website claims this about the site : That ’ s it .
No names @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and they do not identify the “ small and independent digital media company based in the United States ” on their own website .
It takes some digging to find out the name of the company who owns the Worldometer website , and it is Dadax .
They appear to have a single page website which says : It was founded over 15 years ago .
We are the publishers of Worldometer .
When searching for more information about this company , it is difficult to find much else .
There is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but they have publicly stated that they have no affiliation with the U.S. company by the same name .
There is a Dadax , LLC company listed in Delware that is listed as a “ Foreign Limited Liability Company.
” According to this listing , it is managed by two persons , and the principle person is DARIO PASQUALINO .
But there are several other “ related companies ” with the same name .
( Source . )
Interestingly , the Worldometer ’ s website was attacked by cyber attacks in March @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to come down .
( Source . )
Because the data on Worldometer is almost identical to the Center for Systems Science and Engineering ( CSSE ) website at Johns Hopkins University , it is possible that the data source for both sites are the same .
Lauren Gardner , an epidemiologist and co-director of the Center for Systems Science and Engineering at Johns Hopkins University , is credited with developing the dashboard that is mirrored on the Worldometer website .
Guo Meiping , writing for the China Global Television Network ( CGTN @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Why does U.S. COVID-19 data come from a university not the government ?
“ , states : The entire concept and visualization of the ( Johns Hopkins University ) dashboard were prepared by a civil and systems engineering professor , Lauren Gardner , and two Chinese students , Dong Ensheng and Du Hongru – both first-year Ph.D. students at the University ’ s Center for Systems Science and Engineering .
Dong told a local Chinese media outlet that on March 12 , the dashboard got two billion hits from the entire world in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a short piece explaining the dashboard , which was published on the world-leading medical journal The Lancet on February 19 .
At this point , who owns Worldometer is still a mystery .
It appears to mirror the dashboard at Johns Hopkins University , but it is not clear from which site the data originates .
If anyone has any further information , please provide it in the comments section .
Conclusion : Do the Facts Support the Belief that we Have an Accurate COVID-19 Test to Know Who is Dying from COVID-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to review the facts about COVID-19 tests and the data based on those tests that tells us who died from COVID-19 and who did not : Fact # 1 – There is not a single test on the market for COVID-19 that has been approved by the FDA .
Fact # 2 – Pharmaceutical companies argue among themselves as to who has accurate COVID-19 tests and who does not .
Fact # 3 – Official statistics from the CDC , who admittedly pads their numbers to include those not tested or assumed to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what the media is reporting , which uses statistics from a website called “ Worldometer ” that nobody seems to know who owns , or how the data is compiled .
Those are the facts that are verifiable .
So if there is no accurate test for COVID-19 , what is really going on ?
Do We Actually Have a Test that Can Accurately Identify a COVID-19 Virus ?

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
We are witnessing one of the most extraordinary events in human history, and certainly the most far-reaching and impactful event in all of our lifetimes, because of the effects of what we are being told is a single coronavirus.
Here at Health Impact News, as always, we have endeavored to publish the truth about this pandemic, even if the truth is not popular or censored in the corporate-funded “mainstream” media.
This article being published today, on May 5, 2020, might be the most significant article about COVID-19 that we have published on the topic to date.
The rationale for the extraordinary events we are seeing today all come down to one dataset: the amount of people infected with this coronavirus, and the rate at which people are dying from it.
This can only be justified by one simple fact: that we know how to identify and test for this single virus.
If this single fact cannot be proven, or if it is proven to be false, and we really do not have the means to accurately test for this virus, then everything that has transpired as a direct result of trusting the data that this test is based upon, has been built on a faulty foundation that does not exist.
Does this sound like a conspiracy theory? Because if you dare to ask the question, that is what you will be accused of for daring to question the accuracy of the tests, and therefore the accuracy of the data that these tests allegedly prove.
So let’s start with the facts that most everyone agrees upon, or that can be easily verified.
FACT #1: The FDA has NOT Approved a Single Test for COVID-19
This was brought to my attention recently by someone who contacted me who has 43 years of clinical diagnostics experience. In addition to being a Med Tech at one of the New York City metropolitan area’s largest reference laboratories, this person spent 25 years of that 43 working for medical device manufacturers as a biomedical field service engineer and technical consultant. They installed, repaired, troubleshot and validated laboratory instrumentation.
This person wishes to remain anonymous, but this is what they wrote.
FDA emergency Use Authorization and COVID-19 Testing
by a 43-year Veteran of Clinical Diagnostics
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 “Pandemic”, much of government and the media’s focus has been on the need for more testing.
The purpose of this brief article is to examine the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) and the effect these authorizations have on the reliability of test results in identifying positive/negative samples for COVID-19.
Per the FDA website:
Under section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), the FDA Commissioner may allow unapproved medical products or unapproved uses of approved medical products to be used in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions caused by CBRN (Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear) threat agents when there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. (Source.)
The key word in this statement is “unapproved.”
Medical device manufacturing is one of most highly regulated industries in the US. The FDA approval process for a medical device takes years.
To date there are no COVID-19 diagnostic tests being used that have completed a full FDA approval process.
The reason they have not received FDA approval is because the safety and effectiveness of the product has not been proven. Many of these tests have been developed at least since the SARS outbreak of 2000-2004.
Refer to the above FDA website video explaining the EUA process.
Pay particular attention to the statement:
“It is not in the best interest of Americans for the FDA to allow the use of a test that doesn’t work as it should. False test results can contribute to the spread of an infectious disease like COVID-19.”
In reviewing the list of In Vitro Diagnostics products on the FDA website that have received Emergency Use Authorizations, the FDA is contradicting its own claim and is authorizing the use of diagnostics tests that produce false results.
There is a very easy way to confirm this statement, if you know where to look.
From the list of In Vitro Diagnostic products that have received a EUA, select any manufacturer. Go to that manufacturer’s website. Select the test from the products listing.
Look for the “package insert”. The package insert explains everything you need to know about the test, including its intended use, performance and interpretation of results.
Using the ROCHE cobas® SARS-CoV-2 test from the list, go to the Roche website and read the emergency use statement:
Results are for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA that are detectable in nasal, nasopharyngeal, and oropharyngeal swab samples during infection. Positive results are indicative of the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA; clinical correlation with patient history and other diagnostic information is necessary to determine patient infection status. Positive results do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. Laboratories within the United States and its territories are required to report all positive results to the appropriate public health authorities. Negative results do not preclude SARS-CoV-2 infection and should not be used as the sole basis for patient management decisions. Negative results must be combined with clinical observations, patient history, and epidemiological information. (Source.)
The media has also been reporting a shortage of COVID-19 test kits. The CDC has made recommendations on prioritizing patients based on need.
The media makes it appear that anyone can get a nasal swab and get tested. All you need is the result from that swab and you can find out if you are positive or negative for COVID-19 as this Fox News Report implies:
This is far from the truth.
This article by ARUP Laboratories: “How Accurate Are COVID-19 Tests? Many Factors Can Affect Sensitivity, Specificity of Test Results” explains.
Due to internet censorship, articles on research that don’t conform to the current narrative are difficult to find but not impossible. The individual research papers are available by accessing the provided links.
The samples that were tested as part of these research papers were performed in a closed environment, meaning, collection, testing and results interpretations were all done on the same site.
What happens to the validity of test samples that are collected at one location, sent to a local health department, because of insufficient testing capabilities, sent to reference lab and from there sent to an affiliate lab location?
The CDC website has guidelines here.
In summary, the Government and the Media used fictional statistics on the severity of the COVID-19 “pandemic” to instill fear in the US population, shut down entire industries and trash a thriving economy.
States’ Governors forced draconian “shelter in place” orders falsely claiming the necessity to “flatten the curve.”
These same Governors are now claiming the need for mass, unproven antibody testing, those tests receiving FDA EUA, before States can “safely” open up again.
At least there is more reporting on the fallacies of antibody testing then there is on the testing for COVID itself.
Dr. Fauci is already warning of a COVID-19 resurgence this fall.
——————-
FACT #2: The Drug Companies Themselves are Arguing Over Which Tests are Accurate and Which Ones Are Not
We covered this in a previous article:
FACT #3: “Official” Statistics on COVID-19 Deaths Vary Widely Depending on Who You Trust
The corporate media presents daily updates on COVID-19 deaths as if it they were universally accepted as accurate.
But did you know that as of this past weekend, the media’s statistics for COVID-19 deaths were more than 29,000 HIGHER than what the U.S. CDC was reporting?
The media is NOT using CDC statistics to report COVID-19 deaths. They are mainly using statistics from a website called Worldometer.
The number of deaths being reported at the Worldometer website have consistently run about 60% higher than what the CDC website has been publishing.
And as we have previously reported, many doctors and others have come forward to explain that the CDC guidelines for reporting CDC deaths is very liberal, because almost anyone coming into the hospitals right now is automatically counted as COVID-19 patients, and even if they had pre-existing conditions such as heart disease or cancer, they are being reported as COVID-19 deaths.
So the CDC numbers are admittedly high. See:
According to the CDC, COVID-19 deaths reached a peak the week of April 18th.
But according the media, deaths are still increasing and have not even peaked yet, based on the stats they are using from the Worldometer website, which has deaths almost twice as high as the CDC’s padded numbers, and these numbers are the ones being used to instill fear into the American public.
Who Runs the Worldometer Website?
The answer to the question as to who operates the Worldometer website, the website that almost the entire corporate media (and some in the Alternative Media as well) is publishing as fact, seems to be shrouded in mystery.
The Worldometer website claims this about the site:
Worldometer is run by an international team of developers, researchers, and volunteers with the goal of making world statistics available in a thought-provoking and time relevant format to a wide audience around the world. It is published by a small and independent digital media company based in the United States. We have no political, governmental, or corporate affiliation.
That’s it. No names of the people operating the website, and they do not identify the “small and independent digital media company based in the United States” on their own website.
It takes some digging to find out the name of the company who owns the Worldometer website, and it is Dadax. They appear to have a single page website which says:


healthimpactnews--2020-05-06--Ground Zero in Wuhan: What Really Happened that Caused the World to go on Lock Down?

Jon Rappoport has been a journalist for 38 years .
He has written articles on politics , health , media , culture and art for LA Weekly , Spin Magazine , Stern , Village Voice , Nexus , CBS Healthwatch , and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe .
In 1982 , the LA Weekly submitted his name for a Pulitzer prize , for his interview with the president of El Salvador University , where the military had taken over the campus .
Jon has hosted , produced , and written radio programs and segments in Los @ @ @ @ @ @ @ KLAV ) .
He has appeared as a guest on over 200 radio and television programs , including ABC ’ s Nightline , Tony Brown ’ s Journal ( PBS ) , and Hard Copy .
Jon has lectured extensively all over the US on the question : Who runs the world and what can we do about it ?
Since 2000 , Jon has operated largely away from the mainstream media because , as he puts it : Jon Rappoport is an expert on epidemics and pandemics , and knows a lot @ @ @ @ @ @ @ month ago ( end of March , 2020 ) , when Jon had already written about 35 articles on the topic of the coronavirus which originated in Wuhan , China , he produced a series of podcasts summarizing his writings and research , which we have previously published .
Jon was “ ahead of the curve , ” so to speak , in understanding just what happened in Wuhan , and all of my own investigating since he originally broadcast those podcasts over a month ago have not disputed or contradicted anything that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ So I am republishing the first one , and we have also transcribed it to get his treatise on this subject indexed on the Internet ( where it will probably be suppressed if it becomes too popular . )
If you are a regular reader of Health Impact News , by now you should be aware that the narrative being given to the public regarding COVID-19 just does not add up , and earlier today I published the article : Not a Single COVID-19 Test is FDA Approved – Do We Really Know @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
What really happened in Wuhan at the end of 2019 and the beginning of 2020 that started this whole pandemic ?
Was COVID-19 something that escaped a laboratory that was being developed as a weapon ?
Or was it something that developed out of Wuhan ’ s live markets ?
Or was it something else , like the roll out of 5G in the city ?
Wuhan is one of the largest cities in China with a population of over 11 million people .
It is also one of China ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Rappoport , none of these things are responsible for what is happening today .
It was the fact that the Chinese Government was able to convince over 50 million people to stay home , voluntarily , with no protests , no demonstrations , no resistance .
Previously , thousands of people had protested in Wuhan for lesser causes , such as the city ’ s terrible pollution problem .
But when 50 million people were convinced to stay home over a FEAR of something called a coronavirus , the World Health Organization and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it became the blueprint for the rest of the world .
The Creation of a False Epidemic : How it Started This is Jon Rappoport .
I ’ m an investigative reporter .
I ’ ve been working for 38 years as a freelance journalist writing for publications in the US and Europe , and since 2001 my website has been nomorefakenews.com , and I ’ m here to talk about the creation of a false pandemic .
I ’ ve been researching epidemics really now for 30-odd years .
A number of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ primer .
It ’ s going to be impossible for me to cover in detail the 30 or 35 or so articles I ’ ve written on the COVID-19 on my website , so I ’ m going to try to deliver to you the basics , what will cut through the lies .
And this first episode is called , “ How it Started , ” and we go to Wuhan China .
Wuhan is a gigantic city of 11 million people .
It ’ s an economic powerhouse in China .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” to have discovered a new virus , a new coronavirus , which eventually became known as COVID-19 .
I ’ ve described in articles the dubious process by which this discovery was done .
Relying , as I do , on a much older traditional method of purification and discovery , called electron microscope photographs , which would be done with hundreds and hundreds of so-called “ patients ” side by side to see if the photographs are comparable , identical , if really , there are many many particles of virus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ identical from , or close to identical from , photograph to photograph and if they ’ ve never been seen before .
This has never been done .
Instead , some very fancy laboratory work was done very quickly .
It ’ s always amazingly quick in all of these so-called “ epidemics ” how researchers suddenly say , So then you have the discovery so to speak .
But what else is happening in Wuhan , because you have to understand that the Chinese also immediately said that the number one symptom @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Okay , keep that in mind .
Pneumonia .
Now , the city of Wuhan and other Chinese cities have incredibly foul air pollution .
This is not just irritable , bothersome , this is serious stuff we ’ re talking about .
In fact , one review that I ’ ve cited indicates that the air above Wuhan contains an unprecedented mix of toxic elements never seen before in human history , from both the early industrial age and the modern industrial age .
You don ’ t need a germ of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with what ’ s called pneumonia .
In Wuhan all you have to do is breathe .
But the researchers overlooked this , In addition to that , the studies indicate that roughly 300,000 people in China die every year from pneumonia .
This is long before , long long before , the emergence of the so-called coronavirus .
So , 300,000 deaths from pneumonia per year in China would mean millions of cases of pneumonia in China .
Nothing new .
Nothing new whatsoever , and yet still , everyone is quite @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a new virus .
In any science class in high school with reasonably intelligent students and an intelligent teacher , they would see through this in about 12 seconds .
But somehow , the press doesn ’ t see through it .
Governments don ’ t see through .
Nobody asks any questions .
No mainstream reporters say , You can ’ t see the building across the street !
I say , No , no questions asked .
Just absolute loyalty and obedience .
How is that possible ?
The Epidemic Intelligence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I will describe what ’ s called the Epidemic Intelligence Service of the Centers for Disease Control , the CDC .
As the medical CIA they are the virus hunters .
They are several thousand trained medical professionals .
This branch of the CDC , very little known , has been in existence since the Korean War back in the 1950s .
They do several hundred missions a year to areas of quote “ outbreak.
” They are trained , you could say untrained , brainwashed , by their medical training to always @ @ @ @ @ @ @ went to a city with massive industrial pollution pouring out of a plant into the river and turning into 16 colors , and people were dying on the riverbank , they would say , They , [ along ] with other such people in the World Health Organization , also virus hunters and Chinese virus hunters , [ and ] collaborate to decide this has got to be a virus that ’ s causing pneumonia in the city of Wuhan .
If you were to call this whole episode “ dubious ” you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Okay now on top of this , an amazing thing happens as the press and governments around the world are beginning to catch wind of this dubious outbreak in China .
And that is that the Chinese government decides for one reason or another that they ’ re not going to even try to do a diagnostic test directly for the virus .
That ’ s kind of like saying to a patient : So in China , they decided that they would do CT scans on patients as they were coming @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lungs .
What did these scans show ?
Lung infections of various kinds .
Mild , severe , pneumonia-like , whatever .
And on the basis of these scans alone , people would be diagnosed as positive for coronavirus and would be counted as cases .
So to begin , understand that the largest percentage of so-called coronavirus cases in the world , which would be in China , were all cooked up on the basis of no test at all .
Just simply , “ Oh you must be… We presume you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” or CT scans .
That is overwhelmingly what has been done in China .
And from that , very large case numbers have resulted .
Which of course paints the false picture of , “ Woah , the epidemic is spreading.
” Okay ?
All right , now the Chinese did something else .
Something else unprecedented quite early in the episode , and this is the key event in the entire false pandemic .
Never been done before .
[ It ] seemed to be a tremendous shock felt around the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ did !
” “ Unbelievable !
” The Director General of the UN rushed in to say , Really , the brutal dictatorship of China locks down 50 million people overnight , and people are popping champagne corks .
Well , they are at the CDC and the World Health Organization , who have been trying to plant the idea of a false pandemic and failing one after another with West Nile , SARS , swine flu , Zika etc .
etc .
And now they ’ ve got the key in their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all pre-planned or whether it was happening in the moment is another question , but the effect is obvious .
The CDC and the World Health Organization virus hunters are saying this is exactly what we ’ ve needed all along .
The Chinese have locked down 50 million people ; it ’ s never been done before .
They say the virus must be contained , therefore everybody ’ s going to believe this is [ a ] very very very dangerous virus , and we have to contain it .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rest of the world , and we can now do lockdowns .
Get that through your head .
This was the moment .
And so it came to pass… so it came to pass .
This is how it started .
This is where it came from .
This is what was done .
This was the monumentally fake science behind it .
This is what happened .
The Illusion of One Disease with One Cause And now I have to add another factor because this is the biggest con job and stage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of these so-called epidemics or pandemics , and I want you to really try to get this , because it ’ s very very important they create the illusion of one disease with one cause .
It must be one thing .
That ’ s the biggest stage magic trick in the world , and almost everybody falls for it right away .
So for example , after what I ’ ve just said about China and Wuhan and the pollution cause of pneumonia , somebody is going to pipe up immediately and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , you ’ re falling for the oldest Con in the book , because you are wedded to the idea that this must be one disease with one cause .
All the people who are afflicted must be afflicted by the same cause , the virus , or whatever it is .
But that is fake , that is false , that is not true .
That is the picture they are painting .
That is what people fall for .
Even the people who would deny that the coronavirus is the cause @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in with their own answer to what is really causing the one pandemic , and they will have their one cause .
They ’ ll say “ Well it ’ s the rollout of 5g technology ” or it ’ s this or it ’ s that or whatever .
They ’ re falling for the same trick .
They ’ re assuming right from the get-go , because it ’ s a kind of human addiction to fall for it , that it must be one disease with one cause .
And @ @ @ @ @ @ @ That is how they absolutely get you .
Once you bought that one , bang , you ’ re in .
You ’ re part of the club .
And I want to read you a brief paragraph from one of my articles here , as I refute the one disease one cause .
I won ’ t even call it a model – it ’ s a fake forgery .
It ’ s a picture that is put there to hypnotize populations .
Quote : There are people all over the world @ @ @ @ @ @ @ generalized , flu-like , pneumonia-like , list of symptoms for COVID-19 .
And they are being all corralled like horses in the field , so to speak , into the same corral with the same label burned into the plate above the corral , that says “ COVID-19.
” These people are actually suffering from a diverse number of different conditions , caused by many different factors in different cases .
But they are all being corralled under the umbrella term COVID-19 .
This has happened before many times in other epidemics .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ and you have to understand it .
If you don ’ t you ’ re always going to be trapped inside the picture of the one disease one cause .
You ’ re going to say it ’ s this or it ’ s that , but you ’ re going to assume that all the cases all over the world have the same cause .
The diagnostic test for the coronavirus has a tendency to spit out false positives , which will assist in creating the illusion of many many cases around @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into that diagnostic test in more detail in the second part of this series .
But suffice it to say , if you make the assumption unwanted that it ’ s the COVID-19 virus , you see that connects all of these people with diverse conditions together .
That is a false assumption .
It ’ s not borne out .
It ’ s not true .
Instead , what you really have is all these people floating about with different diverse conditions caused by many different factors .
And the virus hunters @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the CDC and the World Health Organization , by their very definitions and lists of symptoms and so forth , and promotion of the diagnostic tests and case number estimates and all manner of reinforcing literature and pronouncements , wave a wand over you and everybody else and say it ’ s all one disease with one cause .
COVID-19 virus .
And that ’ s why we have a pandemic .
And that is the illusion .
The cardinal central basic illusion .
Now somebody else , and I ’ ll quote @ @ @ @ @ @ @ just to give you the objections .
Because they ’ re always going to be many , many , many objections .
And I can hear them , and I get them , and I see them , and I respond to them in articles , because people are not cured of this addiction , which is what it is .
They ’ re not cured of this addiction to say it must be one disease with one cause just by two minutes of conversation .
This is a real addiction , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will show up and say , And the truth of the matter is there is no “ it.
” And that is the kernel of the problem , and that is the core of the addiction .
That people must have an “ it.
” They want one , they need one , they must have one overall explanation .
So somebody would show up and say “ Well what about all these people ( who knows how many ) that suddenly died in City X ( wherever that might be ) ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ in this article I happen to say let ’ s look at a real City X , it ’ s called Wuhan .
And then that ’ s how I led with this .
I described what ’ s happening in a real city , actually Wuhan , and it turns out that overwhelmingly we ’ re talking about horrendous air pollution and possibly the rollout of 5g technology , because Rulon is a center for that development .
I would still like to see more formation on that , particularly at what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Wuhan .
Whether , for example , it ’ s at 60 gigahertz , which could signal some serious , serious harm .
But anyway , these so-called unexplained cases and clusters of cases that people always cite , they don ’ t cite them by saying , No , they speak from their addiction .
They say , “ It must be the virus !
” They don ’ t go there and look , they just say , And again , and I ’ m going to keep pounding on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this trap nothing else matters , it doesn ’ t work .
You can ’ t really assess what is happening here with this so-called pandemic , or other earlier ones .
Because you ’ re always going to come back to the sensation and the feeling and the portrait of one disease with one cause .
That in fact , of course , is the long-standing medical model that has been promoted , well , certainly more than a hundred years .
The Reductionist Medical Model is Very Profitable I don ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ go into the discussion of the whole germ theory of disease .
But suffice to say , that the immune system certainly plays a role in all of this and there are many other factors .
And the reductionist strategy , wherever it is deployed , of reducing human suffering to one disease caused by one germ , is completely fallacious .
To do that in the reductionist manner across the board is a fantastic fallacy .
It ’ s very profitable .
It makes a great deal of money .
It sells @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in behind that and do and develop all manner of drugs , and urge and even pay researchers to find new models of one disease , one germ , so the companies can produce more drugs and more vaccines and make more money .
Absolutely no question about it .
So we certainly have precedent for this model , but in the epidemic arena , the pandemic arena , it ’ s magnified and intensified to a great degree , and people actually become mystical about the whole thing , as you can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people to keep their distance of six feet .
They want to wear masks .
They are quite sure based upon whatever they see on television that it all must be the virus .
That addiction to that idea is at least as solid , if not more solid , than the most solid heroin addiction .
That I can tell you .
So I want to leave you with that for the moment to think about .
Think it through… think it through .
And I will have more evidence to support @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the next episode of “ The Creation of a False Pandemic.
” This is Jon Rappoport .
I want to thank Katherine Austin Fitts and the Solari report for giving me the space , and time , and technology to do this series , and to say my articles are at nomorefakenews.com .
See you next time .
Listen to all three episodes here .

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Jon Rappoport has been a journalist for 38 years. He has written articles on politics, health, media, culture and art for LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, Village Voice, Nexus, CBS Healthwatch, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe.
In 1982, the LA Weekly submitted his name for a Pulitzer prize, for his interview with the president of El Salvador University, where the military had taken over the campus.
Jon has hosted, produced, and written radio programs and segments in Los Angeles and Las Vegas (KPFK, KLAV). He has appeared as a guest on over 200 radio and television programs, including ABC’s Nightline, Tony Brown’s Journal (PBS), and Hard Copy.
Jon has lectured extensively all over the US on the question: Who runs the world and what can we do about it?
Since 2000, Jon has operated largely away from the mainstream media because, as he puts it:
“My research was not friendly to the conventional media.”
Jon Rappoport is an expert on epidemics and pandemics, and knows a lot about China as well.
Over a month ago (end of March, 2020), when Jon had already written about 35 articles on the topic of the coronavirus which originated in Wuhan, China, he produced a series of podcasts summarizing his writings and research, which we have previously published.
Jon was “ahead of the curve,” so to speak, in understanding just what happened in Wuhan, and all of my own investigating since he originally broadcast those podcasts over a month ago have not disputed or contradicted anything that Jon talked about in those podcasts.
So I am republishing the first one, and we have also transcribed it to get his treatise on this subject indexed on the Internet (where it will probably be suppressed if it becomes too popular.)
If you are a regular reader of Health Impact News, by now you should be aware that the narrative being given to the public regarding COVID-19 just does not add up, and earlier today I published the article:
What really happened in Wuhan at the end of 2019 and the beginning of 2020 that started this whole pandemic? Was COVID-19 something that escaped a laboratory that was being developed as a weapon? Or was it something that developed out of Wuhan’s live markets?
Or was it something else, like the roll out of 5G in the city? Wuhan is one of the largest cities in China with a population of over 11 million people. It is also one of China’s most polluted cities.
According to Jon Rappoport, none of these things are responsible for what is happening today. It was the fact that the Chinese Government was able to convince over 50 million people to stay home, voluntarily, with no protests, no demonstrations, no resistance. Previously, thousands of people had protested in Wuhan for lesser causes, such as the city’s terrible pollution problem.
But when 50 million people were convinced to stay home over a FEAR of something called a coronavirus, the World Health Organization and other global medical leaders cheered, and it became the blueprint for the rest of the world.
The Creation of a False Epidemic: How it Started
This was removed from YouTube, but you can listen to the audio here.
Transcript:
This is Jon Rappoport. I’m an investigative reporter. I’ve been working for 38 years as a freelance journalist writing for publications in the US and Europe, and since 2001 my website has been nomorefakenews.com, and I’m here to talk about the creation of a false pandemic.
I’ve been researching epidemics really now for 30-odd years. A number of them.
This is a kind of primer. It’s going to be impossible for me to cover in detail the 30 or 35 or so articles I’ve written on the COVID-19 on my website, so I’m going to try to deliver to you the basics, what will cut through the lies.
How it Started
And this first episode is called, “How it Started,” and we go to Wuhan China.
Wuhan is a gigantic city of 11 million people. It’s an economic powerhouse in China. It was there the researchers “claimed” to have discovered a new virus, a new coronavirus, which eventually became known as COVID-19.
I’ve described in articles the dubious process by which this discovery was done.
Relying, as I do, on a much older traditional method of purification and discovery, called electron microscope photographs, which would be done with hundreds and hundreds of so-called “patients” side by side to see if the photographs are comparable, identical, if really, there are many many particles of virus in each photograph.
If they are identical from, or close to identical from, photograph to photograph and if they’ve never been seen before.
This has never been done. Instead, some very fancy laboratory work was done very quickly. It’s always amazingly quick in all of these so-called “epidemics” how researchers suddenly say,
“Oh yeah we’ve got it. Out of the trillions and trillions of potential viruses we immediately narrowed it down and we found this new coronavirus which we’ve never seen before and we assume or think it may have crossed over from animals into humans etc. etc. etc.”
So then you have the discovery so to speak.
Pneumonia Diagnosed
But what else is happening in Wuhan, because you have to understand that the Chinese also immediately said that the number one symptom of this new disease is pneumonia.
Okay, keep that in mind. Pneumonia.
Now, the city of Wuhan and other Chinese cities have incredibly foul air pollution. This is not just irritable, bothersome, this is serious stuff we’re talking about.
In fact, one review that I’ve cited indicates that the air above Wuhan contains an unprecedented mix of toxic elements never seen before in human history, from both the early industrial age and the modern industrial age.
You don’t need a germ of any kind in order to come down with what’s called pneumonia. In Wuhan all you have to do is breathe.
But the researchers overlooked this,
“Ah, well it must be a new virus that’s causing pneumonia in Wuhan.”
In addition to that, the studies indicate that roughly 300,000 people in China die every year from pneumonia. This is long before, long long before, the emergence of the so-called coronavirus.
So, 300,000 deaths from pneumonia per year in China would mean millions of cases of pneumonia in China.
Nothing new. Nothing new whatsoever, and yet still, everyone is quite sure that this must be caused by a new virus.
In any science class in high school with reasonably intelligent students and an intelligent teacher, they would see through this in about 12 seconds.
But somehow, the press doesn’t see through it. Governments don’t see through. Nobody asks any questions. No mainstream reporters say,
“Well wait a minute, hold on you guys in your virology lab. Have you looked out the window? Have you seen the building across..?”
You can’t see the building across the street! I say,
“Well what do you think is in the haze between?”
No, no questions asked. Just absolute loyalty and obedience.
How is that possible?
The Epidemic Intelligence Service of the Centers for Disease Control
I will describe what’s called the Epidemic Intelligence Service of the Centers for Disease Control, the CDC. As the medical CIA they are the virus hunters.
They are several thousand trained medical professionals. This branch of the CDC, very little known, has been in existence since the Korean War back in the 1950s. They do several hundred missions a year to areas of quote “outbreak.”
They are trained, you could say untrained, brainwashed, by their medical training to always look for the virus,
“Let’s find the virus. Where is the virus?”
If they went to a city with massive industrial pollution pouring out of a plant into the river and turning into 16 colors, and people were dying on the riverbank, they would say,
“I wonder what the virus is?”
They, [along] with other such people in the World Health Organization, also virus hunters and Chinese virus hunters, [and] collaborate to decide this has got to be a virus that’s causing pneumonia in the city of Wuhan.
If you were to call this whole episode “dubious” you would be underestimating it by a trillion.
No Virus Testing Done
Okay now on top of this, an amazing thing happens as the press and governments around the world are beginning to catch wind of this dubious outbreak in China. And that is that the Chinese government decides for one reason or another that they’re not going to even try to do a diagnostic test directly for the virus.
That’s kind of like saying to a patient:
“You know I think you’ve got the virus.” And the patient says, “Well is there a test?” “Yes, but we’re not going to do that test.” “Why not?” “Well because we have a different test.” “And what is that? Does it test for the virus?” “No it doesn’t test for the virus.”
So in China, they decided that they would do CT scans on patients as they were coming into hospitals. CT scans of the lungs.
What did these scans show? Lung infections of various kinds. Mild, severe, pneumonia-like, whatever. And on the basis of these scans alone, people would be diagnosed as positive for coronavirus and would be counted as cases.
So to begin, understand that the largest percentage of so-called coronavirus cases in the world, which would be in China, were all cooked up on the basis of no test at all.
Just simply, “Oh you must be… We presume you’re [a] coronavirus case” or CT scans. That is overwhelmingly what has been done in China.
And from that, very large case numbers have resulted. Which of course paints the false picture of, “Woah, the epidemic is spreading.” Okay?
50 Million People Lock Down
All right, now the Chinese did something else. Something else unprecedented quite early in the episode, and this is the key event in the entire false pandemic.
They locked down 50 million people in three cities overnight. Bang!
Never been done before. [It] seemed to be a tremendous shock felt around the world, “Look what the Chinese did!” “Unbelievable!”
The Director General of the UN rushed in to say,
“This is wonderful. We have to praise the Chinese! They have shown the world the model of what to do in a situation like this to contain the spread of the virus, and it’s marvelous marvelous marvelous…”
Really, the brutal dictatorship of China locks down 50 million people overnight, and people are popping champagne corks.
Well, they are at the CDC and the World Health Organization, who have been trying to plant the idea of a false pandemic and failing one after another with West Nile, SARS, swine flu, Zika etc. etc.
And now they’ve got the key in their hands.
Now, whether this was all pre-planned or whether it was happening in the moment is another question, but the effect is obvious. The CDC and the World Health Organization virus hunters are saying this is exactly what we’ve needed all along.
The Chinese have locked down 50 million people; it’s never been done before. They say the virus must be contained, therefore everybody’s going to believe this is [a] very very very dangerous virus, and we have to contain it.
The Chinese just broke the ice for the rest of the world, and we can now do lockdowns.
Get that through your head. This was the moment. And so it came to pass… so it came to pass. This is how it started. This is where it came from. This is what was done. This was the monumentally fake science behind it. This is what happened.
The Illusion of One Disease with One Cause
And now I have to add another factor because this is the biggest con job and stage magic trick of all.
In all of these so-called epidemics or pandemics, and I want you to really try to get this, because it’s very very important they create the illusion of one disease with one cause.
It must be one thing. That’s the biggest stage magic trick in the world, and almost everybody falls for it right away.
So for example, after what I’ve just said about China and Wuhan and the pollution cause of pneumonia, somebody is going to pipe up immediately and say,
“Yes, but you see look at where all the other cases of coronavirus have been diagnosed around the world, and you will see many places where the air pollution is quite ordinary, or there isn’t any air pollution to speak of at all, and therefore air pollution could not be the cause of the epidemic.”
To which I would reply, you’re falling for the oldest Con in the book, because you are wedded to the idea that this must be one disease with one cause. All the people who are afflicted must be afflicted by the same cause, the virus, or whatever it is.
But that is fake, that is false, that is not true. That is the picture they are painting. That is what people fall for.
Even the people who would deny that the coronavirus is the cause. Some of them will come rolling in with their own answer to what is really causing the one pandemic, and they will have their one cause.
They’ll say “Well it’s the rollout of 5g technology” or it’s this or it’s that or whatever.
They’re falling for the same trick. They’re assuming right from the get-go, because it’s a kind of human addiction to fall for it, that it must be one disease with one cause.
And that is how they get you. That is how they absolutely get you.
Once you bought that one, bang, you’re in. You’re part of the club.
And I want to read you a brief paragraph from one of my articles here, as I refute the one disease one cause. I won’t even call it a model – it’s a fake forgery.
It’s a picture that is put there to hypnotize populations. Quote:
“There are people in Wuhan who have pneumonia, because of the horrendous air quality. There are people in New York who have ordinary, severe flu-like illness. There are people in Italy who have histories of multiple long-term serious health conditions. Pneumonia, flu, cardiac problems, kidney problems, made far worse, through treatment with toxic drugs. There are people in hospitals around the world who, after being diagnosed with COVID, are dosed with powerful toxic antiviral drugs. There are people on breathing ventilators who are being given too much oxygen, and too much pressure, and their lungs collapse. There are perfectly healthy people who are testing positive for the virus, because the test is irreparably flawed. Flawed. Etc. etc. etc.”
There are people all over the world who have various conditions that fit the generalized, flu-like, pneumonia-like, list of symptoms for COVID-19.
And they are being all corralled like horses in the field, so to speak, into the same corral with the same label burned into the plate above the corral, that says “COVID-19.”
These people are actually suffering from a diverse number of different conditions, caused by many different factors in different cases. But they are all being corralled under the umbrella term COVID-19.
This has happened before many times in other epidemics. It’s the same strategy, and you have to understand it. If you don’t you’re always going to be trapped inside the picture of the one disease one cause. You’re going to say it’s this or it’s that, but you’re going to assume that all the cases all over the world have the same cause.
The diagnostic test for the coronavirus has a tendency to spit out false positives, which will assist in creating the illusion of many many cases around the world, and I will go into that diagnostic test in more detail in the second part of this series.
But suffice it to say, if you make the assumption unwanted that it’s the COVID-19 virus, you see that connects all of these people with diverse conditions together.
That is a false assumption. It’s not borne out. It’s not true.
Instead, what you really have is all these people floating about with different diverse conditions caused by many different factors. And the virus hunters and the public health agencies, primarily the CDC and the World Health Organization, by their very definitions and lists of symptoms and so forth, and promotion of the diagnostic tests and case number estimates and all manner of reinforcing literature and pronouncements, wave a wand over you and everybody else and say it’s all one disease with one cause.
COVID-19 virus. And that’s why we have a pandemic. And that is the illusion. The cardinal central basic illusion.
Now somebody else, and I’ll quote again from one of my articles, just to give you the objections. Because they’re always going to be many, many, many objections.
And I can hear them, and I get them, and I see them, and I respond to them in articles, because people are not cured of this addiction, which is what it is. They’re not cured of this addiction to say it must be one disease with one cause just by two minutes of conversation. This is a real addiction, a real addiction.
Okay, so people will show up and say,
“Yeah I understand what you’re saying. It’s very interesting not one disease not one cause, but what about the people who died over here in this city, and what about how do you explain these people dying over there, and and then there’s this group of people that suddenly should die, they showed up at the hospital, they died so it must be all one thing. What is it?”
And the truth of the matter is there is no “it.”And that is the kernel of the problem, and that is the core of the addiction. That people must have an “it.” They want one, they need one, they must have one overall explanation.
So somebody would show up and say “Well what about all these people (who knows how many) that suddenly died in City X (wherever that might be)?” So I write,
“But think it through. If people are actually dying in City X suddenly, and weren’t in the process of dying for a long time since they’re elderly and they have a history, long history of serious illness, if they were really dying suddenly, then you need to see what’s going on in City X specifically and not assume it’s the same thing that’s going on in Wuhan or Seattle or New York or Berlin or Milan. Don’t make that assumption based on nothing. Is something strange happening in a City X Hospital? Is that possible? Are doctors dosing people with highly toxic antiviral drugs, for example? Are they misusing breathing ventilators and collapsing patients’ lungs? Did some dangerous chemical recently show up in the environment in City X? Did someone put it there? Who knows. But assuming it must be the virus is unwarranted. That assumption is based on nothing.”
And then in this article I happen to say let’s look at a real City X, it’s called Wuhan. And then that’s how I led with this. I described what’s happening in a real city, actually Wuhan, and it turns out that overwhelmingly we’re talking about horrendous air pollution and possibly the rollout of 5g technology, because Rulon is a center for that development.
I would still like to see more formation on that, particularly at what band the 5g technology is being deployed in Wuhan. Whether, for example, it’s at 60 gigahertz, which could signal some serious, serious harm.
But anyway, these so-called unexplained cases and clusters of cases that people always cite, they don’t cite them by saying,
“Somebody needs to go to that city and take a look and see what is actually happening on the ground, and why people are falling ill and dying.”
No, they speak from their addiction.
They say, “It must be the virus!” They don’t go there and look, they just say,
“Well I mean it’s obvious therefore it’s the virus because it must be. The virus there must be here, must be there, must be everywhere.”
And again, and I’m going to keep pounding on this because unless people get out of this trap nothing else matters, it doesn’t work.
You can’t really assess what is happening here with this so-called pandemic, or other earlier ones. Because you’re always going to come back to the sensation and the feeling and the portrait of one disease with one cause.
That in fact, of course, is the long-standing medical model that has been promoted, well, certainly more than a hundred years.
The Reductionist Medical Model is Very Profitable
I don’t have the time or space to go into the discussion of the whole germ theory of disease. But suffice to say, that the immune system certainly plays a role in all of this and there are many other factors. And the reductionist strategy, wherever it is deployed, of reducing human suffering to one disease caused by one germ, is completely fallacious.
To do that in the reductionist manner across the board is a fantastic fallacy.
It’s very profitable. It makes a great deal of money. It sells pharmaceutical combines, and companies can come in behind that and do and develop all manner of drugs, and urge and even pay researchers to find new models of one disease, one germ, so the companies can produce more drugs and more vaccines and make more money. Absolutely no question about it.
So we certainly have precedent for this model, but in the epidemic arena, the pandemic arena, it’s magnified and intensified to a great degree, and people actually become mystical about the whole thing, as you can see with the lockdowns.
They want people to keep their distance of six feet. They want to wear masks. They are quite sure based upon whatever they see on television that it all must be the virus.
That addiction to that idea is at least as solid, if not more solid, than the most solid heroin addiction. That I can tell you.
So I want to leave you with that for the moment to think about. Think it through… think it through. And I will have more evidence to support what I’m saying here in the next episode of “The Creation of a False Pandemic.”
This is Jon Rappoport. I want to thank Catherine Austin Fitts and the Solari report for giving me the space, and time, and technology to do this series, and to say my articles are at nomorefakenews.com . See you next time.
Listen to all three episodes here.


healthimpactnews--2020-05-06--CBS News Faked a Busy Coronavirus Testing Line in Michigan

[ Mamaroneck , N.Y.—May 6 , 2020 ] A CBS News crew pulled medical professionals off the floor at the Cherry Medical Center in Grand Rapids , Michigan , to line up in their vehicles so a CBS film crew would have a long line for their COVID-19 coverage .
• ‘ We Could Have Done Other Stuff , ” Registered Nurse complains .
• ‘ Apparently , the news crew wanted more people in the line , ’ said a Cherry Health Supervisor .
• “ We pretended .
There were a couple of real patients , which made @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Nurse .
“ Our insider witnessed the whole thing and came to Project Veritas , because he knew we would protect him , ” said James O ’ Keefe , the founder and CEO of Project Veritas .
“ The insider told us that medical personnel were taken away from treating patients and making the line longer for actual patients wait for the COVID-19 test , ” he said .
In an interview with the insider , O ’ Keefe asked the insider : “ You ’ re telling me you ’ re @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , CBS News Corporation–national , staged a fake event .
They faked the news .
They faked the reality and broadcasted that to all of their audience last Friday on “ CBS This Morning.
” The insider said to him : “ A hundred percent .
Absolutely.
” Nick Ross , a corporate cleaning site supervisor at the Cherry Health facility , said he was there when the CBS News crew arrived and set up the video shoot at the COVID-19 testing site in the parking lot , “ Apparently the news crew @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they knew it was scheduled.
” Maria Hernandez-Vaquez , a professional registration specialist , told the insider that Cherry Health Director of Quality and Informatics Glenda Walker helped to organize the facility ’ s workers into the COVID-19 testing line .
“ It ’ s just annoying cause we could have done other stuff , ” said one registered nurse there recorded with a hidden camera by a Project Veritas insider .
The nurse said personnel at the medical center were given the heads-up to expect the CBS News crew .
“ We @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no clue that we ’ re going to have to , like , do fake patients.
” Another registered nurse , Alison Mauro , recorded on hidden camera , said she and other medical professionals working the drive-through testing site did not administer the actual swab swipe as CBS News was filming , but the actual patients were made to wait longer because of the manufactured line .
“ We pretended .
There were a couple of real patients , which made it worse .
”

by Project Veritas
Excerpts:
[Mamaroneck, N.Y.—May 6, 2020] A CBS News crew pulled medical professionals off the floor at the Cherry Medical Center in Grand Rapids, Michigan, to line up in their vehicles so a CBS film crew would have a long line for their COVID-19 coverage.
‘We Could Have Done Other Stuff,” Registered Nurse complains.
‘Apparently, the news crew wanted more people in the line,’ said a Cherry Health Supervisor.
“We pretended. There were a couple of real patients, which made it worse,” Said
Another Registered Nurse.
“Our insider witnessed the whole thing and came to Project Veritas, because he knew we would protect him,” said James O’Keefe, the founder and CEO of Project Veritas.
“The insider told us that medical personnel were taken away from treating patients and making the line longer for actual patients wait for the COVID-19 test,” he said.
In an interview with the insider, O’Keefe asked the insider: “You’re telling me you’re a hundred percent certain that CBS News, CBS News Corporation–national, staged a fake event. They faked the news. They faked the reality and broadcasted that to all of their audience last Friday on “CBS This Morning.”
The insider said to him: “A hundred percent. Absolutely.”
Nick Ross, a corporate cleaning site supervisor at the Cherry Health facility, said he was there when the CBS News crew arrived and set up the video shoot at the COVID-19 testing site in the parking lot, “Apparently the news crew wanted more people in the line because they knew it was scheduled.”
Maria Hernandez-Vaquez, a professional registration specialist, told the insider that Cherry Health Director of Quality and Informatics Glenda Walker helped to organize the facility’s workers into the COVID-19 testing line.
“It’s just annoying cause we could have done other stuff,” said one registered nurse there recorded with a hidden camera by a Project Veritas insider.
The nurse said personnel at the medical center were given the heads-up to expect the CBS News crew. “We knew they were coming. We had no clue that we’re going to have to, like, do fake patients.”
Another registered nurse, Alison Mauro, recorded on hidden camera, said she and other medical professionals working the drive-through testing site did not administer the actual swab swipe as CBS News was filming, but the actual patients were made to wait longer because of the manufactured line. “We pretended. There were a couple of real patients, which made it worse.”
Read the full story at Project Veritas


healthimpactnews--2020-05-06--CDC Director Dr. Redfield, Dr. Anthony Fauci, and Dr. Deborah Birx’s History of Corruption with the

CDC Director Dr. Redfield, Dr. Anthony Fauci, and Dr. Deborah Birx’s History of Corruption with the HIV Vaccine

Redfield and Birx : Can they be trusted with COVID ?
U.S. military documents show that , in 1992 , the CDC ’ s current Director Robert Redfield and his then-assistant , Deborah Birx—both Army medical officers—knowingly falsified scientific data published in the New England Journal of Medicine fraudulently claiming that an HIV vaccine they helped develop was effective .
They knew the vaccine was worthless .
Redfield now runs the agency charged with mandating COVID vaccines .
Birx , a life-long protégé to both Redfield and Anthony Fauci , served on the board of Bill Gates ’ Global Fund @ @ @ @ @ @ @ charged Redfield and Birx with engaging in “ a systematic pattern of data manipulation , inappropriate statistical analyses and misleading data presentation in an apparent attempt to promote the usefulness of the GP160 AIDS vaccine.
” A subsequent Air Force tribunal on Scientific Fraud and Misconduct agreed that Redfield ’ s “ misleading or , possibly , deceptive ” information : The tribunal recommended investigation by a “ fully independent outside investigative body.
” Dr. Redfield confessed to D.O.D .
interrogators and to the tribunal , that his analyses were faulty and deceptive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Afterward , he continued making his false claims at three subsequent international HIV conferences , and perjured himself in testimony before Congress , swearing that his vaccine cured HIV .
Based upon his testimony , Congress appropriated $ 20 million to the military to support Redfield and Birx ’ s research project .
Public Citizen complained in a 1994 letter to the Congressional Committee ’ s Henry Waxman that the money caused the Army to kill the investigation and “ whitewash ” Redfield ’ s crimes .
The fraud propelled Birx and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children ’ s Health Defense , Inc. Want to learn more from Children ’ s Health Defense ?
Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy , Jr. and the Children ’ s Health Defense .
Your donation will help to support them in their efforts .

Redfield and Birx: Can they be trusted with COVID?
by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Chairman
Children’s Health Defense
U.S. military documents show that, in 1992, the CDC’s current Director Robert Redfield and his then-assistant, Deborah Birx—both Army medical officers—knowingly falsified scientific data published in the New England Journal of Medicine fraudulently claiming that an HIV vaccine they helped develop was effective.
They knew the vaccine was worthless.
Redfield now runs the agency charged with mandating COVID vaccines.
Birx, a life-long protégé to both Redfield and Anthony Fauci, served on the board of Bill Gates’ Global Fund.
Redfield, Birx and Fauci lead the White House coronavirus task force.
In 1992, two military investigators charged Redfield and Birx with engaging in “a systematic pattern of data manipulation, inappropriate statistical analyses and misleading data presentation in an apparent attempt to promote the usefulness of the GP160 AIDS vaccine.”
A subsequent Air Force tribunal on Scientific Fraud and Misconduct agreed that Redfield’s “misleading or, possibly, deceptive” information:
“seriously threatens his credibility as a researcher and has the potential to negatively impact AIDS research funding for military institutions as a whole. His allegedly unethical behavior creates false hope and could result in premature deployment of the vaccine.”
The tribunal recommended investigation by a “fully independent outside investigative body.”
Dr. Redfield confessed to D.O.D. interrogators and to the tribunal, that his analyses were faulty and deceptive. He agreed to publicly correct them.
Afterward, he continued making his false claims at three subsequent international HIV conferences, and perjured himself in testimony before Congress, swearing that his vaccine cured HIV.
Their gambit worked.
Based upon his testimony, Congress appropriated $20 million to the military to support Redfield and Birx’s research project.
Public Citizen complained in a 1994 letter to the Congressional Committee’s Henry Waxman that the money caused the Army to kill the investigation and “whitewash” Redfield’s crimes.
The fraud propelled Birx and Redfield into stellar careers as health officials.
CHD Note: Documents obtained via Tom Paine.
Read the full article at ChildrensHealthDefense.org.
© 2020 Children’s Health Defense, Inc.
This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc.
Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support them in their efforts.


healthimpactnews--2020-05-06--PlanDemic Movie Trailer Released Featuring Whistleblower Dr. Judy Mikovits Exposing Dr. Fauci’s Alle

PlanDemic Movie Trailer Released Featuring Whistleblower Dr. Judy Mikovits Exposing Dr. Fauci’s Alleged Criminal Behavior

Filmmaker Mikki Willis has released the first trailer on his upcoming film : PlanDemic .
The trailer is already being censored on YouTube where some copies have already disappeared .
In this first trailer , Mr. Willis interviews Dr. Judy Mikovits whom we have featured many times here on Health Impact News .
Dr. Mikovits is a whistleblower who was arrested and held without a warrant , and then silenced for 5 years with a gag order .
She states that the man who directed the smear campaign to try and silence her was Dr. Anthony Fauci , currently on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Dr. Mikovits claims other heads of the Department of Health and Human Services ( HHS ) colluded to silence her and suppress her research .
Willis : Apparently their attempts to silence you have failed .
And I have to ask , how do you sit here with confidence to call out these great forces and not fear for your life ?
Dr. Mikovits : Because if we don ’ t stop this now , we can not only forget our Republic and our freedom , but we can forget humanity , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this agenda .

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Filmmaker Mikki Willis has released the first trailer on his upcoming film: PlanDemic.
The trailer is already being censored on YouTube where some copies have already disappeared.
In this first trailer, Mr. Willis interviews Dr. Judy Mikovits whom we have featured many times here on Health Impact News.
Dr. Mikovits is a whistleblower who was arrested and held without a warrant, and then silenced for 5 years with a gag order.
She states that the man who directed the smear campaign to try and silence her was Dr. Anthony Fauci, currently on President Trump’s Coronavirus Task Force.
Dr. Mikovits claims other heads of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) colluded to silence her and suppress her research.