healthimpactnews--2020-05-28--New York City Attorney Explains How to Sue the System When Children are Kidnapped by the State

by Sarah Harris , Shakira Paige , Careena Farmer , Cynthia Zizola and Genesis Pagan , Rise Contributors , and Keyna Franklin , Rise Parent Leader RiseMagazine.org Many parents feel that what we experienced at the hands of child welfare was unjust but that there ’ s nothing we can do about it .
We wanted to find out if that was true , so we interviewed David Lansner , a family court lawyer in New York City and one of the few lawyers in the country that brings lawsuits against the child welfare system on behalf of individual parents @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bar for suing is very high .
But he also told us about some parents and children who sued and won .
And he gave us a lesson in history and government in the process .
Here ’ s what he had to say .
Q : Can you describe your work and why you do it ?
A : I ’ ve been an attorney since 1971 .
I represent parents in family court .
I also represent children and parents in damage actions against the city .
Why do I do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be with their parents and families .
My parents were shocked to find out that that ’ s what I did because they said , “ We didn ’ t think you liked being with us that much.
” But my reason for going to law school was to fight injustice .
Law turned out to be something I ’ m very good at .
It allows me to get into fights .
The things I got in trouble for as a kid , now I get paid for .
Q : What @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whether to take a case ?
A : We had about six cases last year where we sued the city out of about 30 that were presented to us .
It ’ s different if it ’ s children suing or parents suing .
Even if a child needs to be in foster care , and removal was the right thing to do , the child can still for substantial mistreatment , such as sexual abuse or serious physical abuse .
Foster parents generally don ’ t have money , so you want @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the city .
But there you have to show not only a negligent standard .
You have to show that they were very negligent .
Did they make their visits ?
Did they conduct proper investigations when they certified the foster parents ?
Did they check on any complaints that occurred ?
Children may also be able to sue if they are taken for an examination at the hospital or Child Advocacy Center without parental permission , a court order , or a medical emergency .
If the parent sues , first of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ kids back .
We don ’ t bring cases for people who don ’ t have their kids back .
We ’ ll help you get them back .
We ’ ll represent you in family court .
But we won ’ t bring a damage action if you don ’ t have your kids .
If you don ’ t get your kids back , it doesn ’ t matter that they violated your procedural rights .
You ’ re not going to win .
And the city will try to never @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to win your case .
If you don ’ t get the findings reversed , you can ’ t sue for malicious prosecution .
If there ’ s a neglect finding , you might still have a legitimate legal case that your children shouldn ’ t have been removed , because not every finding of neglect shows need for imminent removal .
But if you go into court with a jury of people who don ’ t know anything about the system and try to explain to them the difference between neglect and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hard , and we probably wouldn ’ t take that case .
If you win your case , next you have to show that ACS should not have removed your children , and that they suffered trauma being removed and being in foster care .
A good case to bring is if ACS went to a judge twice for a removal and the judge said no both times , and they did the removal anyway , and then the children were returned by the judge , and the children suffered while they were @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who are going to make a good impression in court .
When I ’ m deciding that , I am not making a personal judgment .
I ’ m making a prediction about what I think a jury would respond to .
Most of all we want to make sure you really care about the case and that you will show up when needed .
These are hard cases .
We ’ re suing people who claim that they ’ re doing God ’ s work .
We can expect a case to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ case we started in 2005 is still going on .
We ’ re going to put in $ 100,000 , $ 200,000 , $ 500,000 worth of legal work into it .
So we want to win .
Q : Can you tell us about some of the cases that you have brought and won ?
A : We had a case where ACS got a report about a 5-year-old girl who was non-verbal .
She didn ’ t talk .
She was in school and the teacher decided to use dolls to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ abused , which is very complicated to do even if you ’ re experienced at it , and this teacher wasn ’ t .
She reported that the girl was sexually abused by her father .
Caseworkers went out and saw the home , they interviewed everybody .
The supervisor said that the girl needed to be examined , but they didn ’ t get a court order to do it .
The supervisor just told the caseworker , “ Don ’ t tell her parents .
Tomorrow , just go to school @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a sexual abuse exam.
” Ultimately there was no finding of sexual abuse against the father , and the court held that taking the girl to the exam was a “ seizure , ” which is illegal , and that there was plenty of time for ACS to go to court to get a court order .
We had another case where ACS went out to investigate a report of abuse .
They went to school and they asked for Natalie somebody , and the school brought down a girl named Natalie .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ was on the report .
She had different siblings .
But instead of saying , “ This is not the right kid , this is the wrong Natalie , ” they removed her , then they went to the school of her siblings and removed them and took them all to the hospital .
When the mother came and said , “ What are you doing ?
I ’ m not the person in this report , ” the caseworker ignored her .
The city settled very quickly .
One of the biggest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Scoppetta .
ACS was removing children because they said mothers who were abused were “ engaging in ” domestic violence .
That ’ s like saying that if you ’ re mugged on the street you engaged in robbery .
The mothers weren ’ t voluntarily doing it , so we filed a class action suit in federal court , and a judge ruled that you can not take away children solely because a parent is the victim of domestic violence .
Q : On what grounds can you sue the child welfare @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have said is that child custody is a “ liberty interest , ” which is covered under the 14thamendment .
The 14th amendment says no person will be deprived of life , liberty or property without due process of law .
And that ’ s very good because a liberty interest is a very important right .
Property is also a right and you get due process but you don ’ t always have to get as much due process , because the court says the harm to you is much greater when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ That applies not just to parents ’ interests in being with their children but to children ’ s interests in being with their parents .
Children actually have two areas where they ’ re protected .
The 4th amendment says you have a right to your home , and not to have unreasonable searches and seizures without a warrant .
Children have a right to not just be seized by the government and put somewhere , even if they ’ re put into grandma ’ s house .
It ’ s still a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ done properly with a warrant or court order .
So children are protected by the 14th amendment and the 4th amendment .
For parents it ’ s only the 14th amendment .
One big loophole to the protections under the 4th and the 14th amendment is that the courts have said there ’ s an exception for emergencies .
As you know , ACS frequently doesn ’ t get a court order , since they have permission for emergency removals and then they go to court afterward .
But there ’ s no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and the courts may have a different version of what constitutes an emergency than ACS does .
ACS ’ s version is often , “ Well , we didn ’ t have time to go to court because the caseworker had to leave.
” That ’ s not my view of an emergency .
The publication Child Welfare Watch recently had statistics that 1,874 children were removed by ACS in 2018 without a court order .
But of those , 514 were returned by the judge at the first court appearance .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ those parents may have grounds for a lawsuit , because a neutral person found that the children didn ’ t need to be removed .
ACS would say that the family ’ s situation changed , but it didn ’ t change that much in one or two days .
Even if ACS gets a court order , they may still be liable , because due process has two parts .
There is “ procedural ” due process .
That means that you have to go to court first and get a court @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ substantive ” due process .
If they lied in one of the papers they presented to the judge or if they omitted something significant , or they brought a case against you and they knew it wasn ’ t a valid case , they can be sued for malicious prosecution .
But to win a malicious prosecution case , it has to be a “ material lie.
” You have to show that the lie would have affected the judge ’ s decision whether to remove the kids .
Q : In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the city ?
A : A child welfare suit against a city , or county , or a foster care agency , can be brought in two different courts .
First , there is New York State Supreme Court , which is the general trial court in New York , and not the highest court , and which has a branch in every county .
Or you can sue in the United States District Court ( federal court ) .
We generally sue in the federal courts , for several reasons : the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ less able to hide their records , and federal courts are used to awarding attorney fees to successful parties , which means that the defendants have to pay fees on top of the damages .
Federal court is concerned with issues that arise under the Constitution of the United States or the laws of the United States .
After the Civil War , the United States adopted three amendments , one was to abolish slavery , one was the freedom to vote , and one said people have the right to equal treatment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the southern states were not providing to their citizens , especially freed slaves .
So eventually Congress enacted a law called the Civil Rights Act , and what it says is that when anyone acting “ under the color of state law ” , such as government agencies , deprives someone of his or her civil rights , that person can sue in federal court , because back then , if you ’ d tried to sue in Alabama courts , it wouldn ’ t have gotten you anywhere .
Q : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , how much might a family win , and how successful are you ?
A : We don ’ t charge for our services in advance .
We do it on a contingency basis .
If we win , we get a share of the winnings , and if we lose , we don ’ t get anything .
We do have expenses , and we do ask all of our clients to make monthly payments toward those expenses , but it depends on what their resources are .
If an ACS case @ @ @ @ @ @ @ able to sue that caseworker .
But caseworkers don ’ t have a lot of money usually .
So you want to sue the city that employs her because the city has a lot of money .
But the Supreme Court says that in civil rights actions , you can only sue the system if you can show that the wrong done to you was done by higher ups or was part of a practice or policy of the organization .
So when we sue , we try to show that the city @ @ @ @ @ @ @ according to city policies or practices .
Very few suits go to trial .
Sometimes they ’ re dismissed before trial but most cases settle .
We have won between $ 5,000 and $ 700,000 for a family .
We consider a settlement a win .
Lansner & Kubitschek represented LaQuana Chappelle and her three children for illegal removal of the children and malicious prosecution of their mother .
The case was settled , with the City of New York paying damages to the four of them .
Read our interview with LaQuana @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
How to write up your case if you think you may have a lawsuit against ACS If you think you may have a lawsuit against New York City ’ s Administration for Children ’ s Services , you can write up your case and send it to David Lansner at DLansner @ lanskub.com .
Your write-up should be about one-page long .
It should include : • The Basics About You : How old you are ; your education and means of support ; whether you ’ re married ; how many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ • The Basics of the Case : The allegations , whether the children were removed ; whether they were removed before a hearing or after ; how long they were removed for ; whether you were prosecuted ; and the results of the case .
• What You Think Was Illegal : That could be that they removed the children without an order ; that they lied on the petition ; that they lied in court , etc .
Comment on this article at MedicalKidnap.com .

by Sarah Harris, Shakira Paige, Careena Farmer, Cynthia Zizola and Genesis Pagan, Rise Contributors, and Keyna Franklin, Rise Parent Leader
RiseMagazine.org
Many parents feel that what we experienced at the hands of child welfare was unjust but that there’s nothing we can do about it. We wanted to find out if that was true, so we interviewed David Lansner, a family court lawyer in New York City and one of the few lawyers in the country that brings lawsuits against the child welfare system on behalf of individual parents and children.
Lansner explained that the bar for suing is very high. But he also told us about some parents and children who sued and won. And he gave us a lesson in history and government in the process.
Here’s what he had to say.
Q: Can you describe your work and why you do it?
A: I’ve been an attorney since 1971. I represent parents in family court. I also represent children and parents in damage actions against the city. Why do I do it? Because I think children should be with their parents and families.
My parents were shocked to find out that that’s what I did because they said, “We didn’t think you liked being with us that much.”
But my reason for going to law school was to fight injustice. Law turned out to be something I’m very good at. It allows me to get into fights. The things I got in trouble for as a kid, now I get paid for.
Q: What are you looking for when you decide whether to take a case?
A: We had about six cases last year where we sued the city out of about 30 that were presented to us.
It’s different if it’s children suing or parents suing.
Even if a child needs to be in foster care, and removal was the right thing to do, the child can still for substantial mistreatment, such as sexual abuse or serious physical abuse.
Foster parents generally don’t have money, so you want to sue the foster care agency and the city. But there you have to show not only a negligent standard. You have to show that they were very negligent. Did they make their visits? Did they conduct proper investigations when they certified the foster parents? Did they check on any complaints that occurred?
Children may also be able to sue if they are taken for an examination at the hospital or Child Advocacy Center without parental permission, a court order, or a medical emergency.
If the parent sues, first of all, you need to have your kids back. We don’t bring cases for people who don’t have their kids back. We’ll help you get them back. We’ll represent you in family court. But we won’t bring a damage action if you don’t have your kids.
If you don’t get your kids back, it doesn’t matter that they violated your procedural rights. You’re not going to win. And the city will try to never return your kids.
You also have to win your case. If you don’t get the findings reversed, you can’t sue for malicious prosecution.
If there’s a neglect finding, you might still have a legitimate legal case that your children shouldn’t have been removed, because not every finding of neglect shows need for imminent removal. But if you go into court with a jury of people who don’t know anything about the system and try to explain to them the difference between neglect and imminent danger, it’s really hard, and we probably wouldn’t take that case.
If you win your case, next you have to show that ACS should not have removed your children, and that they suffered trauma being removed and being in foster care. A good case to bring is if ACS went to a judge twice for a removal and the judge said no both times, and they did the removal anyway, and then the children were returned by the judge, and the children suffered while they were in care.
We also want clients who are going to make a good impression in court. When I’m deciding that, I am not making a personal judgment. I’m making a prediction about what I think a jury would respond to.
Most of all we want to make sure you really care about the case and that you will show up when needed.
These are hard cases. We’re suing people who claim that they’re doing God’s work. We can expect a case to last at least two years. One case we started in 2005 is still going on. We’re going to put in $100,000, $200,000, $500,000 worth of legal work into it. So we want to win.
Q: Can you tell us about some of the cases that you have brought and won?
A: We had a case where ACS got a report about a 5-year-old girl who was non-verbal. She didn’t talk. She was in school and the teacher decided to use dolls to see if the girl had been sexually abused, which is very complicated to do even if you’re experienced at it, and this teacher wasn’t.
She reported that the girl was sexually abused by her father. Caseworkers went out and saw the home, they interviewed everybody. The supervisor said that the girl needed to be examined, but they didn’t get a court order to do it. The supervisor just told the caseworker, “Don’t tell her parents. Tomorrow, just go to school and take her to the hospital for a sexual abuse exam.”
Ultimately there was no finding of sexual abuse against the father, and the court held that taking the girl to the exam was a “seizure,” which is illegal, and that there was plenty of time for ACS to go to court to get a court order.
We had another case where ACS went out to investigate a report of abuse. They went to school and they asked for Natalie somebody, and the school brought down a girl named Natalie. She had a different address than what was on the report. She had different siblings.
But instead of saying, “This is not the right kid, this is the wrong Natalie,” they removed her, then they went to the school of her siblings and removed them and took them all to the hospital. When the mother came and said, “What are you doing? I’m not the person in this report,” the caseworker ignored her. The city settled very quickly.
One of the biggest suits we brought was called Nicholson v. Scoppetta. ACS was removing children because they said mothers who were abused were “engaging in” domestic violence. That’s like saying that if you’re mugged on the street you engaged in robbery. The mothers weren’t voluntarily doing it, so we filed a class action suit in federal court, and a judge ruled that you cannot take away children solely because a parent is the victim of domestic violence.
Q: On what grounds can you sue the child welfare system?
A: What the courts have said is that child custody is a “liberty interest,” which is covered under the 14thamendment. The 14th amendment says no person will be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. And that’s very good because a liberty interest is a very important right. Property is also a right and you get due process but you don’t always have to get as much due process, because the court says the harm to you is much greater when you’re deprived of liberty.
That applies not just to parents’ interests in being with their children but to children’s interests in being with their parents.
Children actually have two areas where they’re protected. The 4th amendment says you have a right to your home, and not to have unreasonable searches and seizures without a warrant. Children have a right to not just be seized by the government and put somewhere, even if they’re put into grandma’s house. It’s still a seizure, and it has to be done properly with a warrant or court order.
So children are protected by the 14th amendment and the 4th amendment. For parents it’s only the 14th amendment.
One big loophole to the protections under the 4th and the 14th amendment is that the courts have said there’s an exception for emergencies. As you know, ACS frequently doesn’t get a court order, since they have permission for emergency removals and then they go to court afterward. But there’s no set definition of what constitutes an emergency, and the courts may have a different version of what constitutes an emergency than ACS does.
ACS’s version is often, “Well, we didn’t have time to go to court because the caseworker had to leave.” That’s not my view of an emergency.
The publication Child Welfare Watch recently had statistics that 1,874 children were removed by ACS in 2018 without a court order. But of those, 514 were returned by the judge at the first court appearance. All of those children and all of those parents may have grounds for a lawsuit, because a neutral person found that the children didn’t need to be removed. ACS would say that the family’s situation changed, but it didn’t change that much in one or two days.
Even if ACS gets a court order, they may still be liable, because due process has two parts.
There is “procedural” due process. That means that you have to go to court first and get a court order.
And then there’s “substantive” due process. If they lied in one of the papers they presented to the judge or if they omitted something significant, or they brought a case against you and they knew it wasn’t a valid case, they can be sued for malicious prosecution.
But to win a malicious prosecution case, it has to be a “material lie.” You have to show that the lie would have affected the judge’s decision whether to remove the kids.
Q: In what kind of court can you sue the city?
A: A child welfare suit against a city, or county, or a foster care agency, can be brought in two different courts. First, there is New York State Supreme Court, which is the general trial court in New York, and not the highest court, and which has a branch in every county. Or you can sue in the United States District Court (federal court).
We generally sue in the federal courts, for several reasons: the cases move faster, the agencies are less able to hide their records, and federal courts are used to awarding attorney fees to successful parties, which means that the defendants have to pay fees on top of the damages.
Federal court is concerned with issues that arise under the Constitution of the United States or the laws of the United States.
After the Civil War, the United States adopted three amendments, one was to abolish slavery, one was the freedom to vote, and one said people have the right to equal treatment.
That was something that especially some of the southern states were not providing to their citizens, especially freed slaves. So eventually Congress enacted a law called the Civil Rights Act, and what it says is that when anyone acting “under the color of state law”, such as government agencies, deprives someone of his or her civil rights, that person can sue in federal court, because back then, if you’d tried to sue in Alabama courts, it wouldn’t have gotten you anywhere.
Q: How much will it cost a family, how much might a family win, and how successful are you?
A: We don’t charge for our services in advance. We do it on a contingency basis. If we win, we get a share of the winnings, and if we lose, we don’t get anything. We do have expenses, and we do ask all of our clients to make monthly payments toward those expenses, but it depends on what their resources are.
If an ACS case worker harms you, you may be able to sue that caseworker. But caseworkers don’t have a lot of money usually. So you want to sue the city that employs her because the city has a lot of money.
But the Supreme Court says that in civil rights actions, you can only sue the system if you can show that the wrong done to you was done by higher ups or was part of a practice or policy of the organization. So when we sue, we try to show that the city is responsible because the caseworker was acting according to city policies or practices.
Very few suits go to trial. Sometimes they’re dismissed before trial but most cases settle. We have won between $5,000 and $700,000 for a family. We consider a settlement a win.
Lansner & Kubitschek represented LaQuana Chappelle and her three children for illegal removal of the children and malicious prosecution of their mother. The case was settled, with the City of New York paying damages to the four of them.
Read our interview with LaQuana Chapelle about her experience suing the system.
If you think you may have a lawsuit against New York City’s Administration for Children’s Services, you can write up your case and send it to David Lansner at DLansner@lanskub.com.
Your write-up should be about one-page long. It should include:
The Basics About You: How old you are; your education and means of support; whether you’re married; how many children you have and their ages.
The Basics of the Case: The allegations, whether the children were removed; whether they were removed before a hearing or after; how long they were removed for; whether you were prosecuted; and the results of the case.
What You Think Was Illegal: That could be that they removed the children without an order; that they lied on the petition; that they lied in court, etc.
Contact Information: Your phone number and email address.
Read the full article at RiseMagazine.org.
Comment on this article at MedicalKidnap.com.


healthimpactnews--2020-05-28--Texas Homeschool Families Take Back Their Public Park and Defy Orders to Leave as Police Back Down

Daniel McAdams writes about how his family and a group of about 35 people who are all homeschool families in Texas took their children to the local park to enjoy the fresh air and sunshine , and tore down police tape that tried to prevent them from using a public park .
They knew that neither the police nor anyone else had any legal authority to close the park or rope it off like that .
Two police came and asked them to leave , and they responded the way every person in the U.S. should respond to such coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ They stood their ground and refused to leave .
They even rebuked the officer who asked them if they were “ anti-vaxxers , ” as if that had anything to do with playing in the park !
The police did not dare arrest such a large group , especially with mothers holding their babies in their arms , so after conferring with the chief of police , they concluded that they could stay .
What a great lesson for these homeschooled children on how to stand up against tyranny !
Now if we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ country to follow their example , we could get this economy up and running again very quickly .
Tyrants need a compliant public to get their way , so what are you waiting for America !
Does liberty mean anything to you anymore ?
Oh , and by the way , the name of the park in Texas where this happened ?
Freedom Park .
As we ’ ve been saying on the Ron Paul Liberty Report for some time , in this period of coronavirus and the naked power-grabs by authoritarian politicians @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there is any hope to claw back some of our liberties it will come from the bottom up .
Politicians are drunk on power and they are not about to enter any kind of 12 step program .
But throughout the country it is the people who are fighting back .
And they are scoring tremendous victories .
On a small scale , a hundred flowers are blooming daily as Americans who perhaps yesterday were not at all political , or who went along to get along , are realizing what is at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ elites laughed at the “ flyover country ” folks in places like the Lake of the Ozarks who ignored demands that they practice “ social distancing ” and wear masks in public over Memorial Day weekend and simply went out and had a good time .
In fact the elites and the sycophants openly wished these people would contract Covid and die as punishment for ignoring the orders of their “ betters.
” That ’ s how sick things have become .
Here in Texas the speaker of the house Dennis Bonnen – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ us lowly citizens that if we want big daddy government to allow us to conduct business again in this state , we need to bow down and scrape .
He told USA Today that if we don ’ t wear masks whenever we go outside , we can ’ t have our freedom back : I don ’ t know what message they are sending other than the message of stupidity that they ’ re not going to wear a face covering in public .
Well , pick it .
Either you want @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be selfish and not wear a face covering when you are in public .
The corrupt Dennis Bonnen may think he can push Texans around , but perhaps he ’ s had his own mask on too tight and is suffering from hypoxia .
Down here in Brazoria county a strong independent spirit runs through the vibrant and active homeschool movement .
In fact Texas homeschoolers and particularly Brazoria County homeschoolers have been the backbone of Ron Paul country .
Earlier this month , a group of homeschoolers mobilized and began challenging the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ through direct action .
It is the most outrageous abuse of power to deny children the ability to go outside in the sun , help virus-killing vitamin D to flow through their systems , and get the exercise that is most directly associated with a healthy immune system and resistance to coronavirus .
Government restricting children from that which keeps them healthy is not “ science ” – it ’ s criminal .
So this group , the “ Park Patriots , ” took action .
First they descended on a park in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hometown , and after the city workers called the police on them they gave the police a lesson in the law and law enforcement .
They ended up at city hall and successfully got the vice mayor to admit that there was no force of law behind the forced shutdown of parks .
Officials pretended they had the authority to deny citizens the facilities they were forced to pay for , but in the end a “ guideline ” is quite different than a law .
The mothers returned to the park and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Victory indeed .
Today the “ Park Patriots ” struck again , trudging up to Angleton ’ s “ Freedom Park ” to again let their homeschooled kids loose on the taped up playground – and to reclaim their freedom .
As they arrived they began dismantling the tape and the other impediments to children using the facilities : The orange fencing keeping children from enjoying the park that their parents paid for ended up exactly where it belonged : One of the children – in this case your author ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ smashing through the ridiculous “ caution ” tape on the swings : Once again it was city workers who called the police on the people who pay their salaries – notice a pattern here ?
– and soon enough some squad cars showed up .
What followed was the greatest example of how citizens can reclaim their own liberty by simply standing up to authoritarians .
By simply working up the courage to say , “ we ’ re not going to take this anymore.
” Here is a short video of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mothers and fathers of Brazoria County when the police tried to strong-arm them to leave the park : Ironic how the officer with “ We The People ” tattooed across his arm showed up with such contempt for the actual people .
One of the homeschool fathers hit the perfect note when he reminded the officer that it was in fact the park itself that belonged to the same “ We The People ” he was wearing on his arm .
Also of interest is that when the officer ’ s falsely asserted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ park was obliterated by the excellent rhetoric of the parents , how only response was the bizarre “ y ’ all anti-vaxxers ?
” Bad move , officer !
Finally , the officer , totally defeated by the arguments of the parents , turned heel and walked away , leaving his colleague dumbfounded and alone .
She also turned around and walked away .
One group of parents broke off to go to the city hall to directly challenge authorities and the other group remained at the park .
Eventually the officer returned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
He tried to act friendly at this point .
“ The chief of police has decided that you can remain at the park.
” And thanks to these brave and dedicated homeschoolers , “ Freedom Park ” is free again : This article was originally published at The Ron Paul Institute .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Daniel McAdams writes about how his family and a group of about 35 people who are all homeschool families in Texas took their children to the local park to enjoy the fresh air and sunshine, and tore down police tape that tried to prevent them from using a public park.
They knew that neither the police nor anyone else had any legal authority to close the park or rope it off like that.
Two police came and asked them to leave, and they responded the way every person in the U.S. should respond to such coronavirus edicts that have no legal authority: They stood their ground and refused to leave. They even rebuked the officer who asked them if they were “anti-vaxxers,” as if that had anything to do with playing in the park!
The police did not dare arrest such a large group, especially with mothers holding their babies in their arms, so after conferring with the chief of police, they concluded that they could stay.
What a great lesson for these homeschooled children on how to stand up against tyranny! Now if we could just get the rest of the country to follow their example, we could get this economy up and running again very quickly.
Tyrants need a compliant public to get their way, so what are you waiting for America! Does liberty mean anything to you anymore?
Oh, and by the way, the name of the park in Texas where this happened? Freedom Park.
Smackdown! Homeschool ‘Park Patriots’ Vs. Brazoria County Park Closures
by Daniel McAdams
Ron Paul Liberty Report As we’ve been saying on the Ron Paul Liberty Report for some time, in this period of coronavirus and the naked power-grabs by authoritarian politicians from all levels of government, if there is any hope to claw back some of our liberties it will come from the bottom up. Politicians are drunk on power and they are not about to enter any kind of 12 step program. But throughout the country it is the people who are fighting back. And they are scoring tremendous victories. On a small scale, a hundred flowers are blooming daily as Americans who perhaps yesterday were not at all political, or who went along to get along, are realizing what is at stake and are standing up. The elites laughed at the “flyover country” folks in places like the Lake of the Ozarks who ignored demands that they practice “social distancing” and wear masks in public over Memorial Day weekend and simply went out and had a good time. In fact the elites and the sycophants openly wished these people would contract Covid and die as punishment for ignoring the orders of their “betters.” That’s how sick things have become. Here in Texas the speaker of the house Dennis Bonnen – ostensibly a conservative Republican – has warned us lowly citizens that if we want big daddy government to allow us to conduct business again in this state, we need to bow down and scrape. He told USA Today that if we don’t wear masks whenever we go outside, we can’t have our freedom back: I don’t know what message they are sending other than the message of stupidity that they’re not going to wear a face covering in public. Well, pick it. Either you want the economy open or you want to be selfish and not wear a face covering when you are in public. The corrupt Dennis Bonnen may think he can push Texans around, but perhaps he’s had his own mask on too tight and is suffering from hypoxia.
Down here in Brazoria county a strong independent spirit runs through the vibrant and active homeschool movement. In fact Texas homeschoolers and particularly Brazoria County homeschoolers have been the backbone of Ron Paul country. Earlier this month, a group of homeschoolers mobilized and began challenging the ridiculous closures of playgrounds throughout Brazoria County through direct action. It is the most outrageous abuse of power to deny children the ability to go outside in the sun, help virus-killing vitamin D to flow through their systems, and get the exercise that is most directly associated with a healthy immune system and resistance to coronavirus. Government restricting children from that which keeps them healthy is not “science” – it’s criminal. So this group, the “Park Patriots,” took action. First they descended on a park in Lake Jackson, Ron Paul’s hometown, and after the city workers called the police on them they gave the police a lesson in the law and law enforcement. They ended up at city hall and successfully got the vice mayor to admit that there was no force of law behind the forced shutdown of parks. Officials pretended they had the authority to deny citizens the facilities they were forced to pay for, but in the end a “guideline” is quite different than a law. The mothers returned to the park and let their kids loose on the playground. Victory indeed. Today the “Park Patriots” struck again, trudging up to Angleton’s “Freedom Park” to again let their homeschooled kids loose on the taped up playground – and to reclaim their freedom. As they arrived they began dismantling the tape and the other impediments to children using the facilities:
The orange fencing keeping children from enjoying the park that their parents paid for ended up exactly where it belonged:
One of the children – in this case your author’s own daughter – relished the idea of smashing through the ridiculous “caution” tape on the swings:
Once again it was city workers who called the police on the people who pay their salaries – notice a pattern here? – and soon enough some squad cars showed up.
What followed was the greatest example of how citizens can reclaim their own liberty by simply standing up to authoritarians. By simply working up the courage to say, “we’re not going to take this anymore.” Here is a short video of the essence of the exchange between the homeschool mothers and fathers of Brazoria County when the police tried to strong-arm them to leave the park:
Ironic how the officer with “We The People” tattooed across his arm showed up with such contempt for the actual people. One of the homeschool fathers hit the perfect note when he reminded the officer that it was in fact the park itself that belonged to the same “We The People” he was wearing on his arm.
Also of interest is that when the officer’s falsely asserted authority to remove the children from the park was obliterated by the excellent rhetoric of the parents, how only response was the bizarre “y’all anti-vaxxers?” Bad move, officer!
Finally, the officer, totally defeated by the arguments of the parents, turned heel and walked away, leaving his colleague dumbfounded and alone. She also turned around and walked away.
One group of parents broke off to go to the city hall to directly challenge authorities and the other group remained at the park.
Eventually the officer returned to the homeschoolers remaining at the park. He tried to act friendly at this point. “The chief of police has decided that you can remain at the park.”
Victory:
And thanks to these brave and dedicated homeschoolers, “Freedom Park” is free again:
We can all make a difference. We can all fight for our freedom, one small battle at a time. We can all help defeat the tyrants. And finally: Don’t mess with Texas…homeschoolers!
This article was originally published at The Ron Paul Institute.
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-05-30--Doctors Gagged as Feds Launch Censorship Campaign

Your right to learn from your doctor about natural methods of staying healthy during the pandemic are under threat .
We must fight back .
Petition !
The FDA , FTC , Department of Justice , and some state attorneys general have launched a coordinated censorship campaign that prevents medical and naturopathic doctors from communicating their extensive knowledge about how to stay healthy during the pandemic using natural medicine .
The actions of these federal agencies will lead to more COVID-19 infections and death .
We have to fight back to preserve our right to stay healthy , naturally .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ a hundred warning letters to doctors , clinics , and companies .
These letters all allege that companies or individuals were 1 ) illegally advertising that certain products treat or prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 ( COVID-19 ) or related conditions , such as inflammation and/or 2 ) making claims on their websites implying that a product could mitigate , prevent , treat , diagnose , or cure COVID-19 or related conditions in people , making the product an unapproved drug under the Food , Drug , and Cosmetic Act .
In reviewing many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is that this isn ’ t about public health , but rather censoring scientific information about natural products and protecting the profits of drug companies .
One letter was sent to a nutritionist who talked about the results of a recent study showing that the severity of coronavirus patient outcome was tied to the patient ’ s vitamin D status .
The post concluded , “ The bottom line ?
In order to give yourself the best defense against the coronavirus , begin with optimizing your vitamin D status to at least 30 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now a public health threat that the government must snuff out ?
Does the government really want to quash information that could help us stay healthy ?
Government censors also didn ’ t like when doctors wrote that vitamin D “ has demonstrated efficacy for respiratory health…and has anti-inflammatory properties , ” or when they quote science , such as a scholarly paper that “ argues that melatonin—at low doses like 0.5 or 1 mg per day—might curb virulence of the coronavirus… ” .
The FTC is even flagging claims about the use @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and support immunity .
At issue for many of these letters is the idea that , according to the FTC , it is unlawful to advertise that a product can prevent , treat , or cure human disease unless you possess “ competent and reliable scientific evidence ” to substantiate the claim .
The FTC has interpreted this to mean that you need a randomized controlled trial ( RCT ) , which is an impossible standard because of costs and other reasons for everyone but drug companies .
( This issue was litigated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ POM Wonderful case we covered extensively . )
We believe these kinds of actions are really meant to preserve the drug industry monopoly on medicine .
RCTs are prohibitively expensive , costing billions of dollars on average .
Drug companies can afford this massive investment because drugs are patentable and enjoy a period of market exclusivity , so companies can recoup the cost of RCTs .
Natural products are generally not patentable , so requiring RCTs to make any specific disease claim—no matter how many studies support the claim—is a backhanded way of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and thus preserving the monopoly of pharmaceutical drugs to treat illness .
So let ’ s get this straight .
The FDA and FTC are telling doctors they can ’ t talk about or advise the public on natural methods of treating or preventing COVID-19 .
These same agencies , particularly the FDA in combination with the CDC , have repeatedly bungled our nation ’ s response to the pandemic .
These same agencies issue emergency approvals for dangerous drugs that go on to kill people .
These same agencies are threatening to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ choose estriol as a treatment .
These same agencies , and the laws they enforce , make our medicine less effective , more expensive , and more dangerous .
And now they want to prevent Americans from learning about scientifically-proven benefits of supplements like vitamin D to help during the pandemic ?
Never before has our crony capitalist government put so many lives at risk so needlessly .
Note too that President Trump himself is not only taking zinc along with hydroxychloroquine .
He is also publicizing it , which is seemingly at @ @ @ @ @ @ @ within his own government .
Various state attorneys general have also gotten in on the action .
This is not just another action alert .
This is a petition .
We are going to be contacting federal and state officials , including the President , to explain how agencies that are supposed to be protecting Americans are , and have been , undermining and endangering our health .
This is a critical moment , and we need as many signatures as possible .
Please take action below and share this with people you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Trump , telling him to stop the FDA and the FTC from further pursuing this censorship campaign , with copies to Congress and state legislators , telling them to fix the laws that make medicine in this country more expensive , more dangerous , and less effective .
Please send your message immediately .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

by Alliance for Natural Health
Your right to learn from your doctor about natural methods of staying healthy during the pandemic are under threat. We must fight back. Petition!
The FDA, FTC, Department of Justice, and some state attorneys general have launched a coordinated censorship campaign that prevents medical and naturopathic doctors from communicating their extensive knowledge about how to stay healthy during the pandemic using natural medicine. The actions of these federal agencies will lead to more COVID-19 infections and death. We have to fight back to preserve our right to stay healthy, naturally.
The FDA and FTC sent more than a hundred warning letters to doctors, clinics, and companies. These letters all allege that companies or individuals were 1) illegally advertising that certain products treat or prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) or related conditions, such as inflammation and/or 2) making claims on their websites implying that a product could mitigate, prevent, treat, diagnose, or cure COVID-19 or related conditions in people, making the product an unapproved drug under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
In reviewing many of these letters, what becomes clear is that this isn’t about public health, but rather censoring scientific information about natural products and protecting the profits of drug companies. One letter was sent to a nutritionist who talked about the results of a recent study showing that the severity of coronavirus patient outcome was tied to the patient’s vitamin D status. The post concluded, “The bottom line? In order to give yourself the best defense against the coronavirus, begin with optimizing your vitamin D status to at least 30 ng/ml starting today.” Is vitamin D now a public health threat that the government must snuff out? Does the government really want to quash information that could help us stay healthy?
Government censors also didn’t like when doctors wrote that vitamin D “has demonstrated efficacy for respiratory health…and has anti-inflammatory properties,” or when they quote science, such as a scholarly paper that “argues that melatonin—at low doses like 0.5 or 1 mg per day—might curb virulence of the coronavirus…”. The FTC is even flagging claims about the use of natural approaches to fight respiratory infections and support immunity.
At issue for many of these letters is the idea that, according to the FTC, it is unlawful to advertise that a product can prevent, treat, or cure human disease unless you possess “competent and reliable scientific evidence” to substantiate the claim. The FTC has interpreted this to mean that you need a randomized controlled trial (RCT), which is an impossible standard because of costs and other reasons for everyone but drug companies. (This issue was litigated a number of years ago in the POM Wonderful case we covered extensively.)
We believe these kinds of actions are really meant to preserve the drug industry monopoly on medicine. RCTs are prohibitively expensive, costing billions of dollars on average. Drug companies can afford this massive investment because drugs are patentable and enjoy a period of market exclusivity, so companies can recoup the cost of RCTs. Natural products are generally not patentable, so requiring RCTs to make any specific disease claim—no matter how many studies support the claim—is a backhanded way of preventing all disease claims for natural products and thus preserving the monopoly of pharmaceutical drugs to treat illness.
So let’s get this straight. The FDA and FTC are telling doctors they can’t talk about or advise the public on natural methods of treating or preventing COVID-19. These same agencies, particularly the FDA in combination with the CDC, have repeatedly bungled our nation’s response to the pandemic. These same agencies issue emergency approvals for dangerous drugs that go on to kill people. These same agencies are threatening to take away women’s rights to choose estriol as a treatment. These same agencies, and the laws they enforce, make our medicine less effective, more expensive, and more dangerous. And now they want to prevent Americans from learning about scientifically-proven benefits of supplements like vitamin D to help during the pandemic? Never before has our crony capitalist government put so many lives at risk so needlessly.
Note too that President Trump himself is not only taking zinc along with hydroxychloroquine. He is also publicizing it, which is seemingly at odds with the position of the agencies within his own government.
Various state attorneys general have also gotten in on the action.
This is not just another action alert. This is a petition. We are going to be contacting federal and state officials, including the President, to explain how agencies that are supposed to be protecting Americans are, and have been, undermining and endangering our health. This is a critical moment, and we need as many signatures as possible. Please take action below and share this with people you know.
Petition! Write to President Trump, telling him to stop the FDA and the FTC from further pursuing this censorship campaign, with copies to Congress and state legislators, telling them to fix the laws that make medicine in this country more expensive, more dangerous, and less effective. Please send your message immediately.
Read the full article at ANH-USA.org.
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-05-30--The New World Order: Creating a Crisis so the Rich Get Richer While Millions Lose Their Jobs

Earlier this week I published a report about how the plan to develop a “ New World Order ” through the United Nations is no longer a conspiracy “ theory , ” as the plans have been published , and the whole coronavirus response has been exposed as a “ Plandemic.
” See : The UN “ New World Order ” Has Now Been Published : No Longer a “ Conspiracy Theory ” – Out of the Shadows One of the major results of the Plandemic has been that the world ’ s wealthiest people have instantly increased their wealth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have lost their jobs , and tens of thousands of small businesses have failed .
At the quarantine ’ s outset , I warned that despots and billionaires would leverage the crisis to ratchet up surveillance and authoritarian control .
They would transform America into a National Security State , engineer the final liquidation of America ’ s middle class and transfer its wealth to a plutocracy of digital and Pharma billionaires .
Sure enough , at breakneck speed we have devolved from the world ’ s exemplary democracy to a tyrannical near-police @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Data/Big Telecom , the Medical Cartel , and the Military/Industrial/Intelligence Complex .
This nationwide , extended quarantine has permanently shuttered over 100,000 small businesses , cost 38 million jobs and 27 million Americans their health care .
The Super Rich elite are flourishing while a despairing middle class flounders .
According to a report by Americans for Tax Fairness , billionaires are watching their wealth compound beyond imagination .
Between March 18 , when lockdown began , and May 19 , the combined net worth of Bill Gates ( Microsoft ) , Jeff @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Facebook ) , Warren Buffett ( Berkshire Hathaway ) and Larry Ellison ( Oracle ) grew by $ 75.5 billion .
According to Forbes data , the total wealth of the 630 U.S. billionaires jumped by $ 434 billion—15 % —from $ 2.948 trillion to $ 3.382 trillion .
Tech stocks are the most bullish about the Surveillance State .
Microsoft ( Bing ) , Facebook and Amazon are facilitating our devolution into militarized oligarchy by enforcing censorship against all expressions of dissent .
Zuckerberg ’ s wealth increased by 46.2 percent ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s by 30.6 percent ( $ 34.6 billion ) ; Gates ’ s by 8.2 percent ( $ 8 billion ) .
Their stocks hit all-time highs this week .
Amazon shares were up 29 % since January and Facebook spiked 10 % in lockstep with the Lockdown .
( Full artcle . )
Dr. Ron Paul , a former U.S .
Congressman , says that the “ Deep State ” is able to do this through the Central Banking of the Federal Reserve , as the Globalists control the world ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ without the Federal Reserve , and their ability to create money out of thin air , the coronavirus response never could have been accomplished .
Dr. Paul covered the Federal Reserve ’ s role in the Plandemic in his daily broadcast today , The Liberty Report : Who Owns The Fed ?
Are They To Blame For 40 Million Unemployed ?
The Federal Reserve is an unconstitutional government-created monopoly .
Bankers and politicians can act recklessly , while the rest of the population suffers the consequences and pays the price .
Without the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ forced to act more rationally ?
Without the Fed , perhaps locking down the states would have been unthinkable .
But now the unprecedented damage has been done , and bailouts from The Fed are proceeding .
The American public has ( and will continue ) to pay the gut-wrenching price as long as The Fed exists .
It enables the endless wars .
It enables the bankrupt welfare state , and The Fed has enabled Coronavirus tyranny .
Dr. Paul has tried to warn the public for decades that the Federal Reserve @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the liberty of Americans .
While a U.S .
Congressman , he tried for years to pass legislation that would allow the Federal Reserve to be audited so the world could see what it is they do in secret , but the legislation never gained much traction .
He was featured in a film several years ago called “ Fiat Empire.
” A copy still exists on YouTube that you can watch that is about 1 hour long : Here is an excerpt of his comments on the Federal Reserve in a shorter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s New World Order plan replaces the world ’ s economic systems with something called “ Happytalism.
” But at what price will a one-world government be able to provide “ happiness , ” and who gets to define “ happiness ?
” The Globalists who control the Central banks are often referred to as the “ Illuminati , ” and throughout history they have funded wars , and created the illegal drug trafficking cabals worldwide .
They are also involved in the occult and behind the lucrative child sex trafficking network , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will they define “ happiness ” as being able to more openly indulge in their pedophile activities ?
Efforts to normalize pedophilia in American culture have been increasing in recent years .
See : Why I Canceled My Netflix Account and You Should Too : Promoting Pedophilia is NOT OK !
Publicly Open Pedophile Running for Office in Virginia Reveals How Foster Care is a Pipeline to Adopt Children as “ Sex Toys ” During the current Plandemic , we have seen how they determine which businesses to destroy and which ones to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ essential ” and “ non-essential.
” Liquor stores and marijuana dispensaries , for example , were declared “ essential ” ( presumably to keep the population sedated as much as possible during the lockdowns ) , while church businesses , restaurants , and other businesses where people could congregate and and hold discussions were declared “ non-essential.
” And now just this week a new crisis has emerged that has destroyed businesses in one major city already , and threatens to expand across the nation because of the tragic death of a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ around the country due to police brutality .
There are estimated to be around 700,000 to a million law enforcement officers in the U.S. , and one could probably find examples of racism and police brutality across this country every day , so why is this event being promoted in the corporate media to encourage rioting and potentially looting , which we know is controlled by the Globalists ?
( See the Out of the Shadows documentary . )
Independent journalist ReallyGraceful , who published the excellent investigative reports about Globalist Bill Gates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ important questions to consider as America watches this narrative unfold .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Earlier this week I published a report about how the plan to develop a “New World Order” through the United Nations is no longer a conspiracy “theory,” as the plans have been published, and the whole coronavirus response has been exposed as a “Plandemic.” See:
One of the major results of the Plandemic has been that the world’s wealthiest people have instantly increased their wealth, while at the same time millions have lost their jobs, and tens of thousands of small businesses have failed.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. reported earlier this week:
Dr. Ron Paul, a former U.S. Congressman, says that the “Deep State” is able to do this through the Central Banking of the Federal Reserve, as the Globalists control the world’s monetary supply. He explains how without the Federal Reserve, and their ability to create money out of thin air, the coronavirus response never could have been accomplished.
Dr. Paul covered the Federal Reserve’s role in the Plandemic in his daily broadcast today, The Liberty Report:
Who Owns The Fed? Are They To Blame For 40 Million Unemployed?
The Federal Reserve is an unconstitutional government-created monopoly. Bankers and politicians can act recklessly, while the rest of the population suffers the consequences and pays the price. Without the Fed, would U.S. Governors have been forced to act more rationally? Without the Fed, perhaps locking down the states would have been unthinkable. But now the unprecedented damage has been done, and bailouts from The Fed are proceeding. The American public has (and will continue) to pay the gut-wrenching price as long as The Fed exists. It enables the endless wars. It enables the bankrupt welfare state, and The Fed has enabled Coronavirus tyranny.
Dr. Paul has tried to warn the public for decades that the Federal Reserve is unconstitutional, and a threat to the liberty of Americans. While a U.S. Congressman, he tried for years to pass legislation that would allow the Federal Reserve to be audited so the world could see what it is they do in secret, but the legislation never gained much traction.
He was featured in a film several years ago called “Fiat Empire.” A copy still exists on YouTube that you can watch that is about 1 hour long:
Here is an excerpt of his comments on the Federal Reserve in a shorter 9 minute section:
The UN’s New World Order plan replaces the world’s economic systems with something called “Happytalism.”
A New Economic System, Socio-Political Philosophy, And Human Development Paradigm Which Places The Primacy Of Happiness, Well-being, and Freedom At The Center Of Human Development And All Life.
But at what price will a one-world government be able to provide “happiness,” and who gets to define “happiness?”
The Globalists who control the Central banks are often referred to as the “Illuminati,” and throughout history they have funded wars, and created the illegal drug trafficking cabals worldwide.
They are also involved in the occult and behind the lucrative child sex trafficking network, where Satanic ritualistic abuse happens. So will they define “happiness” as being able to more openly indulge in their pedophile activities? Efforts to normalize pedophilia in American culture have been increasing in recent years. See:
During the current Plandemic, we have seen how they determine which businesses to destroy and which ones to leave running, by labeling them as “essential” and “non-essential.”
Liquor stores and marijuana dispensaries, for example, were declared “essential” (presumably to keep the population sedated as much as possible during the lockdowns), while church businesses, restaurants, and other businesses where people could congregate and and hold discussions were declared “non-essential.”
And now just this week a new crisis has emerged that has destroyed businesses in one major city already, and threatens to expand across the nation because of the tragic death of a young man that was filmed and broadcast around the country due to police brutality.
There are estimated to be around 700,000 to a million law enforcement officers in the U.S., and one could probably find examples of racism and police brutality across this country every day, so why is this event being promoted in the corporate media to encourage rioting and potentially looting, which we know is controlled by the Globalists? (See the Out of Shadows documentary.)
Independent journalist ReallyGraceful, who published the excellent investigative reports about Globalist Bill Gates that we published recently, asks some important questions to consider as America watches this narrative unfold.
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-05-30--Plandemic Stage 2: PlannedChaos – American Cities Become a War Zone Overnight

As the United States begins to open up their states from the Coronavirus Plandemic and begin the summer season , a new crisis now dominates the news cycle : the reactions to the horrible death of George Floyd in Minneapolis at the hands of police .
Events are unfolding fast now , as protests have spread from Minneapolis to almost every major city in the U.S. , something that probably has not been seen in the U.S. since the 1960s race riots .
Even the White House was locked down for a brief time yesterday , so strong were the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ now “ fully mobilized ” the National Guard , a force of over 13,000 , in the biggest deployment in the state ’ s history , and if the violence continues across the U.S. , we can probably expect similar deployments in other states as well .
How could this happen ?
First , we have to remind ourselves that the corporate media is controlled by a few main leaders , and they spin the narrative that they want spread to the American public .
The Globalists need a crisis to create the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ usher in their New World Order , which we have previously reported is no longer a “ Conspiracy Theory ” as the plans have now been published on the Internet .
If you have not yet watched the film , Out of the Shadows , please do .
This is a timely film for the ages , and in it you will learn about the CIA ’ s Operation Mockingbird developed back in the 1940s after WWII to control the minds and values of Americans through the media .
See also : Mainstream @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or Controlled Propaganda ?
We now know that the protests and rioting that have been going on in Minneapolis , which were relatively peaceful the first night or two , are being caused by people coming into the state from the outside .
In his press conference this morning ( Saturday May 30th ) Minnesota Governor Tim Walz stated : They estimate that 80 % of the protesters now are from outside the State of Minnesota .
Governor Walz claims that they used contact tracing , the same technology being used for COVID-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coming in from outside the state : As is to be expected , the alleged groups coming into the State are being attributed to different groups , based on partisan politics .
One thing is for certain : This is not about George Floyd anymore .
There is a bigger purpose to this , and it was obviously planned .
Adam Dick , writing for the Ron Paul Institute in an article titled “ Protesters , Rioters , Looters , and Revolutionaries , Be Aware There Are Government Agents Among You , ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be spot on , as a cell phone camera caught a man who was wearing a riot-control gas mask in plain clothes breaking the window of an Autozone store , which later burned down : As the video went viral , some people identified the man as St. Paul police officer Jacob Pederson .
The police department denied it , and the corporate media tried to discredit the story , but a woman who claims to be his ex-wife came forward and said she recognized not only him , but also the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( Source . )
Adam Dick goes on to write about one of the videos he watched online : I looked at a Friday Twitter post by journalist Luke Rudkowski .
Rudkowski ’ s tweet includes a video clip in which a uniformed cop is among a group of people , many of whom seem to not be too happy with the cop .
The cop is doling out some physical abuse , particularly on an individual he is trying to restrain , and receiving some physical abuse as well from several people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the cop may be on the verge of being overpowered and seriously hurt .
Indeed , it looks like a situation where he may pull out a gun to protect himself .
In the latter part of the video , one more person rushes into the area of conflict and seems to engage in a scuffle with the cop , drawing the cop out of the area and even chasing the cop off .
At least that is how it seemed the first time I watched the video .
Something seemed off about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ latter part of the video , so I watched a few more times .
Watching the video over and over , it looks more and more like the man who had seemed to come in to scuffle with the cop is actually pulling the cop out of the fray as a friend or coworker may do , while maybe putting on some ruse of conflict to ensure the extraction works .
Indeed , at the end of the video clip , after a few viewings , it sure looks like neither man is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ once clear of the danger that had confronted the cop , both men appear to jog off together .
It seems impossible to be certain just from looking at the video clip , but what appears to be happening here is an undercover cop , posing as a member of the protest , riot , or whatever came in to save the uniformed cop ’ s bacon or to prevent a further escalation of the physical conflict .
Undercover government agents are out there , and they are not out there just to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also there for purposes including surveilling and foiling the protesters , rioters , looters , or revolutionaries , as well as both provoking people to commit crimes and making arrests .
What will the Government Reaction be ?
We are now seeing unprecedented events unfolding very quickly before our eyes , as our world rapidly changes .
As I have noted in previous articles , you can throw out the term “ Conspiracy Theory ” now , because we are living through this , and it is quite obvious that for these events @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , there is a plan in place .
See : The UN “ New World Order ” Has Now Been Published : No Longer a “ Conspiracy Theory ” – Out of the Shadows The only question unanswered at this point , is what is the next move of the Globalists , or what many people call the “ Deep State ?
” Because every time they create a crisis , they have a planned solution in place to combat the fear that the crisis presents , all in the name of keeping @ @ @ @ @ @ @ look at the narrative the corporate media is creating , don ’ t fall into the trap of thinking that racial divisions and inequalities are the key issue here .
They probably have a much larger goal in mind here to usher in this “ New World Order.
” Up until now , all of the protests we have seen since the coronavirus situation started have been largely among white middle class Americans , such as protesting at State Capitals , homeschool families going to parks that are supposedly closed in order to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and opening up their stores , etc .
Up until this week , we have not really seen many protests in the poorer sections of the major cities , where the vast majority of minorities live .
Could it be because the government has tried to keep everyone quiet by handing out stimulus checks , increasing unemployment benefits , and other things to keep everyone quiet and willing to endure the lock downs ?
But now that has changed almost literally overnight , and we need to ask , why ?
This is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ black man anymore , as horrible as that was .
And could it be that those in the cities are walking into a trap by participating in these riots ?
The National Guard is already being called out in some states , and there is talk that if that is not enough to quell the violence , that the military could get involved .
The United Nations has also weighed in on the riots , and have condemned them stating “ Procedures must change.
” One police precinct in Minneapolis has already burned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prelude to the militarization of our cities , with possible UN involvement ?
We reported a couple of weeks ago that the government ’ s Operation Warp Speed program , which is spending HUNDREDS of BILLIONS of dollars to fast-track a COVID vaccine , is led by a military general , General Gustave Perna , and that once the vaccine is ready , it will be deployed by the military .
See : Trump Mobilizes Military to Deliver Coronavirus Vaccine – Appoints Another Bill Gates Funded Big Pharma Exec as Chief Military Advisor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ think the idea of a national mandatory COVID vaccine for everyone is probably not going to happen , given that almost 30 percent of adults polled say they would not take one , and given the fact that currently less than 50 % of the adult population gets the annual flu shot .
The resistance would probably be very high , and this is a battle that will be happening at the State level , where there are already mandatory vaccination laws on the books for children , as a condition for public @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that would probably happen , is that most government services , such as public education , public housing , public health care , food stamps , etc .
– might all be conditioned on receiving the COVID vaccine , so that those who refuse the vaccine will no longer be able to avail of these free public services , which by that time might even include “ Universal Basic Income , ” which some believe the current stimulus checks are a prelude to .
And who will this affect the most ?
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are out on the streets protesting against racial inequalities , largely the poor minorities today who are mostly unemployed and who can not afford to say “ no ” and instead choose private education , private healthcare , etc .
And remember , Dr. Judy Mikovits and Dr. Sherri Tenpenny , have both said that the COVID vaccine could easily kill 50 million people , and seriously injure many more who will wish they had died , and be dependent on the medical system for the rest of their life .
See : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : A New COVID Vaccine Could Kill 50 Million People in the U.S. Eugenics and Reducing the World ’ s Population is the Goal for a New World Order What the government response is going to be to these riots that are so quickly spreading throughout the U.S. is still speculation at this point .
I am writing this on Saturday afternoon , May 30th , and there are fears that the rioting will increase and be even worse tonight , so the situation is changing very rapidly and is very fluid .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ we already do know regarding the Globalists and their agenda for a “ New World Order.
” They want the population reduced – this is no secret .
Bill Gates and others who are blazing the path into this “ brave new world ” have very strong ties to the eugenics movement , which seeks to reduce the world ’ s population , primarily through the medical system , as the “ science ” behind today ’ s medical system is largely based on eugenics , even though the actual word “ eugenics @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
See : Mapping the Genome and Modern Genetics : Eugenics Repackaged for Modern Times The people typically targeted to reduce the world ’ s population are the old and feeble , and the young who are child-bearing age , particularly the poor .
If you haven ’ t been paying attention , Stage 1 of the Plandemic did a pretty “ good ” job of reducing American ’ s sick elderly population , as the casualties were overwhelmingly in America ’ s nursing homes and assisted living facilities .
At one point @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that about 80 % of the COVID deaths were in nursing homes .
Today they are estimating that figure to be around one third , but we need to consider that when federal funding kicked in for COVID treatments , just about anyone coming into the hospital was considered a COVID patient , and there have even been recent reports that people dying in automobile accidents are being labeled as COVID deaths , just so they can be reimbursed for expenses .
But we were told this COVID virus did not affect children @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for Stage 2 ?
Will we see widespread injuries due to medical products like vaccines where young girls become infertile , as is happening now with the Gardasil virus vaccine ?
And will there be mass casualties due to medical products like vaccines , that will possibly be blamed on a “ second wave ” of the COVID virus , prompting even more medical interventions such as vaccines ?
It is all speculation at this point , but things are moving fast , and people need to wake up and understand that there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we have been watching unfold in American cities the past couple of days really has nothing to do with the tragic death of a young black man .
There could be much , much larger problems to worry about and start preparing for in terms of a resistance movement .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
As the United States begins to open up their states from the Coronavirus Plandemic and begin the summer season, a new crisis now dominates the news cycle: the reactions to the horrible death of George Floyd in Minneapolis at the hands of police.
Events are unfolding fast now, as protests have spread from Minneapolis to almost every major city in the U.S., something that probably has not been seen in the U.S. since the 1960s race riots.
Even the White House was locked down for a brief time yesterday, so strong were the protests.
The Governor of Minnesota has now “fully mobilized” the National Guard, a force of over 13,000, in the biggest deployment in the state’s history, and if the violence continues across the U.S., we can probably expect similar deployments in other states as well.
How could this happen?
First, we have to remind ourselves that the corporate media is controlled by a few main leaders, and they spin the narrative that they want spread to the American public. The Globalists need a crisis to create the planned response in order for them to usher in their New World Order, which we have previously reported is no longer a “Conspiracy Theory” as the plans have now been published on the Internet.
If you have not yet watched the film, Out of the Shadows, please do. This is a timely film for the ages, and in it you will learn about the CIA’s Operation Mockingbird developed back in the 1940s after WWII to control the minds and values of Americans through the media. See also:
We now know that the protests and rioting that have been going on in Minneapolis, which were relatively peaceful the first night or two, are being caused by people coming into the state from the outside.
In his press conference this morning (Saturday May 30th) Minnesota Governor Tim Walz stated:
This is absolutely no longer about George Floyd or addressing inequities anymore. This is an organized attack designed to destabilize civil society.
They estimate that 80% of the protesters now are from outside the State of Minnesota.
Governor Walz claims that they used contact tracing, the same technology being used for COVID-19, to determine who these people are coming in from outside the state:
As we have made arrests, we have done contract-tracing similar to our Covid response. Who are they associated with? What platforms are they advocating for?
As is to be expected, the alleged groups coming into the State are being attributed to different groups, based on partisan politics.
President Trump tweeted:
It’s ANTIFA and the Radical Left. Don’t lay the blame on others!
while Governor Walz said:
We have seen things like white supremacy…
One thing is for certain: This is not about George Floyd anymore. There is a bigger purpose to this, and it was obviously planned.
Adam Dick, writing for the Ron Paul Institute in an article titled “Protesters, Rioters, Looters, and Revolutionaries, Be Aware There Are Government Agents Among You,” stated:
With protests, riots, looting, and revolutionary acts rising over the last few days across the country, here is a bit of information for participants in these activities to keep in mind: There are likely government agents among you. These government agents are undercover and taking part in the activities with you. Their role may be to take down names and inform on activities; their role may be to act as provocateurs, seeking to lead you and others to do or say particular things; their role may be to make arrests.
Adam’s words appear to be spot on, as a cell phone camera caught a man who was wearing a riot-control gas mask in plain clothes breaking the window of an Autozone store, which later burned down:
As the video went viral, some people identified the man as St. Paul police officer Jacob Pederson.
The police department denied it, and the corporate media tried to discredit the story, but a woman who claims to be his ex-wife came forward and said she recognized not only him, but also the respirator and gloves he was wearing. (Source.)
Adam Dick goes on to write about one of the videos he watched online:
I looked at a Friday Twitter post by journalist Luke Rudkowski. Rudkowski’s tweet includes a video clip in which a uniformed cop is among a group of people, many of whom seem to not be too happy with the cop. The cop is doling out some physical abuse, particularly on an individual he is trying to restrain, and receiving some physical abuse as well from several people in the crowd. It appears that the cop may be on the verge of being overpowered and seriously hurt. Indeed, it looks like a situation where he may pull out a gun to protect himself. In the latter part of the video, one more person rushes into the area of conflict and seems to engage in a scuffle with the cop, drawing the cop out of the area and even chasing the cop off. At least that is how it seemed the first time I watched the video. Something seemed off about how the two men interacted in the latter part of the video, so I watched a few more times. Watching the video over and over, it looks more and more like the man who had seemed to come in to scuffle with the cop is actually pulling the cop out of the fray as a friend or coworker may do, while maybe putting on some ruse of conflict to ensure the extraction works. Indeed, at the end of the video clip, after a few viewings, it sure looks like neither man is chasing after the other. Instead, once clear of the danger that had confronted the cop, both men appear to jog off together. It seems impossible to be certain just from looking at the video clip, but what appears to be happening here is an undercover cop, posing as a member of the protest, riot, or whatever came in to save the uniformed cop’s bacon or to prevent a further escalation of the physical conflict. Undercover government agents are out there, and they are not out there just to protect the uniformed police. They are also there for purposes including surveilling and foiling the protesters, rioters, looters, or revolutionaries, as well as both provoking people to commit crimes and making arrests.
What will the Government Reaction be?
We are now seeing unprecedented events unfolding very quickly before our eyes, as our world rapidly changes. As I have noted in previous articles, you can throw out the term “Conspiracy Theory” now, because we are living through this, and it is quite obvious that for these events to happen as quickly as they are, there is a plan in place. See:
The only question unanswered at this point, is what is the next move of the Globalists, or what many people call the “Deep State?”
Because every time they create a crisis, they have a planned solution in place to combat the fear that the crisis presents, all in the name of keeping everyone “safe.”
So as you look at the narrative the corporate media is creating, don’t fall into the trap of thinking that racial divisions and inequalities are the key issue here. They probably have a much larger goal in mind here to usher in this “New World Order.”
Up until now, all of the protests we have seen since the coronavirus situation started have been largely among white middle class Americans, such as protesting at State Capitals, homeschool families going to parks that are supposedly closed in order to protest, small business owners defying orders and opening up their stores, etc.
Up until this week, we have not really seen many protests in the poorer sections of the major cities, where the vast majority of minorities live. Could it be because the government has tried to keep everyone quiet by handing out stimulus checks, increasing unemployment benefits, and other things to keep everyone quiet and willing to endure the lock downs?
But now that has changed almost literally overnight, and we need to ask, why?
This is not about the brutal death of a black man anymore, as horrible as that was. And could it be that those in the cities are walking into a trap by participating in these riots?
The National Guard is already being called out in some states, and there is talk that if that is not enough to quell the violence, that the military could get involved. The United Nations has also weighed in on the riots, and have condemned them stating “Procedures must change.”
The UN Human Rights Chief has demanded that authorities in the United States take “serious action” to stop the police killings of unarmed African-Americans following the death of George Floyd. (Source.)
One police precinct in Minneapolis has already burned down. Could this all be a prelude to the militarization of our cities, with possible UN involvement?
We reported a couple of weeks ago that the government’s Operation Warp Speed program, which is spending HUNDREDS of BILLIONS of dollars to fast-track a COVID vaccine, is led by a military general, General Gustave Perna, and that once the vaccine is ready, it will be deployed by the military. See:
I have also previously written that I think the idea of a national mandatory COVID vaccine for everyone is probably not going to happen, given that almost 30 percent of adults polled say they would not take one, and given the fact that currently less than 50% of the adult population gets the annual flu shot.
The resistance would probably be very high, and this is a battle that will be happening at the State level, where there are already mandatory vaccination laws on the books for children, as a condition for public education.
So the more likely scenario that would probably happen, is that most government services, such as public education, public housing, public health care, food stamps, etc. – might all be conditioned on receiving the COVID vaccine, so that those who refuse the vaccine will no longer be able to avail of these free public services, which by that time might even include “Universal Basic Income,” which some believe the current stimulus checks are a prelude to.
And who will this affect the most?
The same people represented by those who today are out on the streets protesting against racial inequalities, largely the poor minorities today who are mostly unemployed and who cannot afford to say “no” and instead choose private education, private healthcare, etc.
And remember, Dr. Judy Mikovits and Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, have both said that the COVID vaccine could easily kill 50 million people, and seriously injure many more who will wish they had died, and be dependent on the medical system for the rest of their life. See:
Eugenics and Reducing the World’s Population is the Goal for a New World Order
What the government response is going to be to these riots that are so quickly spreading throughout the U.S. is still speculation at this point. I am writing this on Saturday afternoon, May 30th, and there are fears that the rioting will increase and be even worse tonight, so the situation is changing very rapidly and is very fluid.
But let’s think about what we already do know regarding the Globalists and their agenda for a “New World Order.”
They want the population reduced – this is no secret. Bill Gates and others who are blazing the path into this “brave new world” have very strong ties to the eugenics movement, which seeks to reduce the world’s population, primarily through the medical system, as the “science” behind today’s medical system is largely based on eugenics, even though the actual word “eugenics” fell out of favor during WWII. See:
The people typically targeted to reduce the world’s population are the old and feeble, and the young who are child-bearing age, particularly the poor.
If you haven’t been paying attention, Stage 1 of the Plandemic did a pretty “good” job of reducing American’s sick elderly population, as the casualties were overwhelmingly in America’s nursing homes and assisted living facilities.
At one point around mid-March, the CDC was reporting that about 80% of the COVID deaths were in nursing homes. Today they are estimating that figure to be around one third, but we need to consider that when federal funding kicked in for COVID treatments, just about anyone coming into the hospital was considered a COVID patient, and there have even been recent reports that people dying in automobile accidents are being labeled as COVID deaths, just so they can be reimbursed for expenses.
But we were told this COVID virus did not affect children much.
So is this the plan for Stage 2? Will we see widespread injuries due to medical products like vaccines where young girls become infertile, as is happening now with the Gardasil virus vaccine? And will there be mass casualties due to medical products like vaccines, that will possibly be blamed on a “second wave” of the COVID virus, prompting even more medical interventions such as vaccines?
It is all speculation at this point, but things are moving fast, and people need to wake up and understand that there is an agenda here, and what we have been watching unfold in American cities the past couple of days really has nothing to do with the tragic death of a young black man.
There could be much, much larger problems to worry about and start preparing for in terms of a resistance movement.
————–
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-05-31--New Study Shows Again that Unvaccinated Children are Healthier than Vaccinated Children

Last week we published an article showing the evidence that unvaccinated children are healthier than vaccinated children , and we featured several video testimonies from families where previously pro-vaccine parents changed their minds after viewing vaccine injuries in their children , and subsequently did not vaccinate future children , creating the perfect home laboratory to observe the difference between vaccinated children and unvaccinated children .
See : Unvaccinated Children are Healthier than Vaccinated Children – Most Censored Topic in the U.S. ?
Last week , a new study was published in the journal SAGE Open Medicine titled : Analysis of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : Developmental delays , asthma , ear infections and gastrointestinal disorders It was authored by Dr. Brian Hooker and Neil Miller .
Dr. Hooker is well-known to readers of Health Impact News , as we have featured his work many times over the years .
He has done more than perhaps anyone in the U.S. to expose fraud at the CDC in regards to their vaccine studies that supposedly prove vaccines are not linked to autism .
( Previous articles about Dr. Brian Hooker . )
Here is the press release from Children @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are less likely to be diagnosed with developmental delays , asthma , and ear infections .
A new peer-reviewed study in the journal SAGE Open Medicine details the health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children from three pediatric practices in the United States concludes that unvaccinated children have better health outcomes than their vaccinated peers .
Children in the study were followed continuously for a minimum of 3 years from birth .
The study was based on medical records of over 2000 children enrolled in three pediatric practices and born between November 2005 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ determined based on any vaccination received prior to one year of age which yielded 30.9 % of the children in the unvaccinated group .
Results show that vaccination before one year of age led to significantly increased odds of medical diagnoses of developmental delays , asthma and ear infections in children .
In a separate analysis , based on the number of vaccines received by one year of age , children receiving more vaccines were more likely to be diagnosed with gastrointestinal disorders compared to those who received no vaccines within the same @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccinated prior to six months of age showed significant risks of each of the disorders studied as compared to unvaccinated children in the same timeframe .
The study , coauthored by Dr. Brian Hooker and Mr. Neil Miller , is unique in that all diagnoses were verified using abstracted medical records from each of the participating pediatric practices .
These findings are consistent with additional research that has identified vaccination as a risk factor for a variety of adverse health outcomes .
Such findings merit additional large-scale study of vaccinated and unvaccinated children @ @ @ @ @ @ @ well as protection against infectious diseases.
” Children ’ s Health Defense ( CHD ) has assembled nearly 60 studies that find vaccinated cohorts to be far sicker than their unvaccinated peers .
CHD is a non-profit organization dedicated to ending the recent epidemic of chronic health conditions affecting 54 % of children .
The organization recognizes a variety of harmful environmental exposures contributing to an overall decline in children ’ s health .
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com .
This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ learn more from Children ’ s Health Defense ?
Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy , Jr. and the Children ’ s Health Defense .
Your donation will help to support them in their efforts .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist ( kidney doctor ) , Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people .
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained @ @ @ @ @ @ @ practicing real , ethical medicine .
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines , no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public .
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children , and even adults .
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact , part of the Health Impact News network .

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Last week we published an article showing the evidence that unvaccinated children are healthier than vaccinated children, and we featured several video testimonies from families where previously pro-vaccine parents changed their minds after viewing vaccine injuries in their children, and subsequently did not vaccinate future children, creating the perfect home laboratory to observe the difference between vaccinated children and unvaccinated children. See:
Last week, a new study was published in the journal SAGE Open Medicine titled:
It was authored by Dr. Brian Hooker and Neil Miller.
Dr. Hooker is well-known to readers of Health Impact News, as we have featured his work many times over the years. He has done more than perhaps anyone in the U.S. to expose fraud at the CDC in regards to their vaccine studies that supposedly prove vaccines are not linked to autism. (Previous articles about Dr. Brian Hooker.)
Here is the press release from Children’s Health Defense.
New Research Study Clarifies Health Outcomes in Vaccinated versus Unvaccinated Children
Unvaccinated children are less likely to be diagnosed with developmental delays, asthma, and ear infections.
by Children’s Health Defense
A new peer-reviewed study in the journal SAGE Open Medicine details the health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children from three pediatric practices in the United States concludes that unvaccinated children have better health outcomes than their vaccinated peers.
Children in the study were followed continuously for a minimum of 3 years from birth. The study was based on medical records of over 2000 children enrolled in three pediatric practices and born between November 2005 and June 2015. Vaccination status was determined based on any vaccination received prior to one year of age which yielded 30.9% of the children in the unvaccinated group. Results show that vaccination before one year of age led to significantly increased odds of medical diagnoses of developmental delays, asthma and ear infections in children.
In a separate analysis, based on the number of vaccines received by one year of age, children receiving more vaccines were more likely to be diagnosed with gastrointestinal disorders compared to those who received no vaccines within the same timeframe. In temporal analyses, children vaccinated prior to six months of age showed significant risks of each of the disorders studied as compared to unvaccinated children in the same timeframe.
The study, coauthored by Dr. Brian Hooker and Mr. Neil Miller, is unique in that all diagnoses were verified using abstracted medical records from each of the participating pediatric practices.
Lead author of the study, Dr. Hooker, stated,
“The results definitely indicate better health outcomes in children who did not receive vaccines within their first year of life.”
These findings are consistent with additional research that has identified vaccination as a risk factor for a variety of adverse health outcomes. Such findings merit additional large-scale study of vaccinated and unvaccinated children in order to provide optimal health as well as protection against infectious diseases.”
Children’s Health Defense (CHD) has assembled nearly 60 studies that find vaccinated cohorts to be far sicker than their unvaccinated peers. CHD is a non-profit organization dedicated to ending the recent epidemic of chronic health conditions affecting 54% of children. The organization recognizes a variety of harmful environmental exposures contributing to an overall decline in children’s health.
Read the full article at Children’s Health Defense.
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.
© 2020 Children’s Health Defense, Inc.
This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc.
Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support them in their efforts.
See Also:
Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Book – The Vaccine Court “The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program” ORDER HERE!
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
Order here!
Make a Statement for Health Freedom!
Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children, and even adults.
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact, part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!