healthimpactnews--2020-05-08--Bill Gates History of Vaccine Corruption Inflicting Harm and Death on Unsuspecting People in Poor Co

Bill Gates History of Vaccine Corruption Inflicting Harm and Death on Unsuspecting People in Poor Countries

A recent petition asking for the U.S. government to investigate the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for crimes against humanity , already signed by over a half of a million people , shows that the activities of Bill and Melinda Gates are being looked at more closely by the public these days .
However , this is not the first time that Mr. Gates has received criticism for his dodgy dealings involving vaccination policies worldwide for more than a decade .
Gates Commits Crimes Against the Children of India In 2014 , an article that was published by the Economic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ studies : Why is Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation under fire from critics in India ?
stated : Tragically , months later , many of the students had become ill and , by 2010 , five of them had died .
For more on this subject , see : Professionals and activists in India were so outraged by the situation that on October 29 , 2012 , activists Kalpana Mehta and Nalini Bhanot , along with Dr. Rukmini Rao , President of the Gramya Resource Centre for Women in India , filed a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ India under Article 32 of The Constitution of India for Women .
The petition was filed against : • MSD Pharmaceuticals also known as Merck Private Limited The petition outlined a series of serious allegations regarding the HPV vaccines Gardasil® and Cervarix® .
Petitioners Kalpana Mehta , Nalini Bhanot and Dr. Rukmini Rao reported that the two HPV vaccines were illegally brought into the states of Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat and subsequently were administered to thousands of young , vulnerable Indian children before the vaccines were known to be safe .
The three @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Indian government and the above organizations knew the HPV vaccines were of dubious value and of speculative benefits , they continued to allow a trial using both the Gardasil® and Cervarix® vaccines without regard to the potential endangerment of the lives of adolescent girls .
The petition outlined how the above organizations vaccinated tens of thousands of vulnerable girls aged between 10-14 years and then abandoned them without providing any information on potential adverse reactions , scheduling follow-up examinations , or offering post-vaccine treatment .
Petitioners stated that the unlicensed HPV vaccines @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : All girls were vaccinated by the U.S.-based NGO ( Non-Government Organization ) and PATH ( Program for Appropriate Technology in Health ) .
As stated in the petition , the project was discontinued only after several women ’ s organizations reported : • The use of vulnerable population The petitioners accused project leaders of falsification of the records and stated that the project had been carried out with severe lack of monitoring , stating that PATH and the Indian Council of Medical Research ( ICMR ) as well as state authorities covered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have been described in the petition .
In an interview , Kalpana Mehta told us that there had been gross anomalies in the death-related documentation , indicating a cover-up and that even the age of the girls who died failed to match the projects records .
She said : The fact that there was no parental consent is truly shocking , however , when you delve more deeply into the organizations that were behind this unethical vaccination experiment , you discover the possible reasons why .
One reason could have been the fact @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Gates Foundation had been found to be indirectly paying scientists to exaggerate vaccination needs .
If that was not bad enough , a document found on the World Health Organization ( WHO ) website titled Summary of Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation-supported HPV Vaccine Partner Activities stated : Reading this document alone is evidence enough that the HPV vaccination experiment that took place in 2009 was largely funded by the Gates Foundation .
However , this was not the only alleged crime against the children of India that was funded by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ publicized that Bill Gates is on a mission to eradicate wild polio from developing countries .
In 2012 , the CDC published a press release titled Update on Vaccine-Derived Polioviruses — Worldwide , April 2011–June 2012 .
They wrote : The CDC recommended that the best way to deal with this problem is mass vaccination .
They stated : Immunodeficiency disorders occur when the body ’ s immune response is reduced or absent .
In other words , governments worldwide are actively promoting a vaccine that they know will cause millions of vulnerable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine-induced polio .
In order for governments to mass vaccinate more efficiently , they are fully backing the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation , a group that has made it very clear that their aim is to eradicate wild polio .
However , it appears that Bill Gates was ignorant of the fact that his efforts were causing tens of thousands of children to suffer from vaccine-induced polio .
According to the Activist Post in 2010 , the Polio Global Eradication Initiative , founded in 1988 by the World Health Organization , Rotary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CDC , ( all organizations which are funded by the Gates Foundation ) stated that there were only 42 cases of wild polio reported in India .
This all sounds impressive , until you realize that cases of vaccine-induced polio are reaching epic proportions .
In a paper published in the Medical Journal of Medical Ethics , authors Neetu Vashishi and Jacob Puliyel stated that : With numbers of this size being reported , you would think that someone , somewhere , would have tried to stop the devastation .
However , instead @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the vaccination program in its tracks , governments worldwide , have instead , continued to support Bill Gates .
However , it appears that all is not well and that India may be losing confidence in Gates ’ vaccination programs .
Because in 2017 , it was reported that India had decided to cut some of its funding ties with the foundation .
See : India cuts some funding ties with Gates Foundation on immunization .
Gates Causes More Devastation – This Time in Africa In December 2012 , in the small village @ @ @ @ @ @ @ situated on the edge of the Sahara Desert , five hundred children were locked into their school and threatened that if they did not agree to being force-vaccinated with a meningitis A vaccine , they would receive no further education .
These children were vaccinated without their parents ’ knowledge .
This vaccine was an unlicensed product still going through the third and fourth phases of testing .
Within hours , 106 children began to suffer from headaches , vomiting , severe uncontrollable convulsions and paralysis .
The children ’ s wait for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wait one full week for a doctor to arrive while the team of vaccinators proceeded to vaccinate others in the village .
When the doctor finally came , he could do nothing for the children .
The team of vaccinators , upon seeing what had happened , fled the village in fear .
The original report was written in a small , local newspaper called La Voix .
The newspaper stated that forty children were finally transferred to a hospital in Faya and later taken by plane to two hospitals in N ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
After being moved around several times , many of these sick children were finally taken back to their village without a diagnosis and each family was given an unconfirmed sum of £1000 by the government .
No forms were signed and no documentation was seen .
They were informed that their children had not suffered a vaccine injury .
However , if this were true , why would their government award each family £1000 in what has been described by their parents as hush money ?
The only mainstream news channel to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ children was a local channel called Tchad , which filmed footage of the then-Prime Minister of Chad visiting the children in hospital .
VacTruth , who reported on this story , owns copies of all of the original reports , along with a wide range of medical and government documents .
However , despite this evidence and VacTruth ’ s detailed and extensive coverage , including highlighting television footage , once again , the vaccine program was hailed a success .
The groups behind this project were PATH , WHO , UNICEF , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Vactruth ’ s investigations , it was discovered that in fact the whole project was run by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation .
Please see VacTruth ’ s video containing original footage and documents .
In a press release regarding the vaccination , the Gates Foundation stated : However , if these disasters were not enough , it appears that the Gates Foundation struck again two years later , this time using a tetanus vaccination laced with hormone hCG .
Tetanus Vaccines Laced with Hormones Known to Cause Miscarriage In 2014 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ discovered that the tetanus vaccinations that had been administered to 2.3 million girls and women by the World Health Organization and UNICEF had been contaminated with the anti-fertility hormone hCG .
Interestingly , this news came after it was announced that the Gates Foundation had awarded UNICEF $ 26 million to eliminate maternal and neonatal Tetanus ( MNT ) by 2005 .
Sadly , by September of 2017 , MG Modern Ghana reported that more than 500,000 young girls and women had become infertile , following the tetanus vaccine administered by the government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ something that Dr. Ngare , who reported the situation to the authorities , had been desperate to avoid .
However , it appears that Gates and his friends were not satisfied with their efforts and so they decided to introduce a second vaccine containing hormones , to the citizens of Kenya .
Dr. Ngare Raises Concerns Over a Second Vaccine Contaminated with Hormones In 2015 , the Kenyan Conference of Catholic Bishops ( KCCB ) reported that they had decided to boycott the current polio vaccine program because they believed that the vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , another organization which received funding from the Gates Foundation , may contain estradiol , a derivative of the estrogen hormone , which is believed to cause infertility .
To discover why these concerns had arisen , we contacted Dr. Ngare at that time to ask him more about his fears and the concerns of the KCCB .
Dr. Ngare told Health Impact News that the KCCB first became concerned about the polio vaccination program after the tetanus vaccinations were found to be contaminated the previous year .
He explained that the KCCB @ @ @ @ @ @ @ final tetanus vaccine report in February 2015 and that their support for any future vaccination campaigns would be on the condition that joint government/KCCB testing took place before , during and post-vaccination .
As they were in the process of negotiating joint testing , they took the liberty of collecting samples from the field from the new shipment brought in for a vaccination campaign planned for April , before any immunization took place .
Dr. Ngare explained that when the KCCB tested a selection of polio vaccines from the field , they discovered @ @ @ @ @ @ @ contained estradiol .
He explained that while there have been no human studies to determine the effect that this could have on humans , in animal studies , estradiol , when exposed to males , has been shown to damage the sperm-forming mechanism in the testes .
For the full story , see : Dr. Ngare Confirms That a Second Vaccine Has Been Contaminated With Hormones Known to Cause Infertility .
After all of these tragedies involving vaccine programs initiated by the Gates Foundation , we believe that it is not difficult to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ White House to investigate the foundation in more detail , as Mr. Gates announces his intent to provide a COVID-19 vaccine to vaccinate the entire world , using new technology for this vaccine that has never been used before , including embedding one ’ s vaccination status into their skin using an invisible “ tatoo ” into one ’ s skin .
Mass Sterilization of Millions of African Girls through Tetanus Vaccine Scandal Broadens as Kenyan Laboratory Attacked 7 Billion Doses of COVID-19 Vaccine for World ’ s Population of 7 Billion – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Bill Gates ’ Plan to use Microneedles to Deliver COVID19 Vaccine and Embed Vaccination Status into the Skin Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com .
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist ( kidney doctor ) , Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people .
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real , ethical medicine .
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines , no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children , and even adults .
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact , part of the Health Impact News network .

by Christina England
Health Impact News
A recent petition asking for the U.S. government to investigate the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for crimes against humanity, already signed by over a half of a million people, shows that the activities of Bill and Melinda Gates are being looked at more closely by the public these days.
However, this is not the first time that Mr. Gates has received criticism for his dodgy dealings involving vaccination policies worldwide for more than a decade.
Gates Commits Crimes Against the Children of India
In 2014, an article that was published by the Economic Times of India, titled Controversial vaccine studies: Why is Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation under fire from critics in India? stated:
“In 2009, several schools for tribal children in Khammam district in Telangana — then a part of undivided Andhra Pradesh — became sites for observation studies for a cervical cancer vaccine that was administered to thousands of girls aged between nine and 15. The girls were administered the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccine in three rounds that year under the supervision of state health department officials. The vaccine used was Gardasil, manufactured by Merck. It was administered to around 16,000 girls in the district, many of whom stayed in state government-run hostels meant for tribal students.”
Tragically, months later, many of the students had become ill and, by 2010, five of them had died.
For more on this subject, see:
Professionals and activists in India were so outraged by the situation that on October 29, 2012, activists Kalpana Mehta and Nalini Bhanot, along with Dr. Rukmini Rao, President of the Gramya Resource Centre for Women in India, filed a writ petition with the Supreme Court of India under Article 32 of The Constitution of India for Women. The petition was filed against:
Drug Controller General of India
Indian Council of Medical Research ( funded by Gates Foundation )
) State of Andhra Pradesh
State of Gujarat
PATH International ( funded by Gates Foundation )
) GlaxoSmithKline Asia Private Limited
MSD Pharmaceuticals also known as Merck Private Limited
(Please note that GSK and Merck have also received funding from the Gates Foundation.)
The petition outlined a series of serious allegations regarding the HPV vaccines Gardasil® and Cervarix®. Petitioners Kalpana Mehta, Nalini Bhanot and Dr. Rukmini Rao reported that the two HPV vaccines were illegally brought into the states of Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat and subsequently were administered to thousands of young, vulnerable Indian children before the vaccines were known to be safe.
The three petitioners told the court that even though the Indian government and the above organizations knew the HPV vaccines were of dubious value and of speculative benefits, they continued to allow a trial using both the Gardasil® and Cervarix® vaccines without regard to the potential endangerment of the lives of adolescent girls.
The petition outlined how the above organizations vaccinated tens of thousands of vulnerable girls aged between 10-14 years and then abandoned them without providing any information on potential adverse reactions, scheduling follow-up examinations, or offering post-vaccine treatment.
Petitioners stated that the unlicensed HPV vaccines only became licensed midway through the project:
“These vaccines had not been assessed with respect to safety and efficacy for the Indian population where adolescent girls are overwhelmingly anemic and malnourished. No steps were taken to ensure the health and safety of the girls. They were not screened adequately for contraindications. On the contrary, they were told that the vaccine had no adverse effects, not even those that were acknowledged by the manufacturers. Referral and treatment of serious adverse effects was not planned and as a result, private doctors and government hospitals were not aware that the girls coming to them in serious condition were subjects of vaccine trials. No monitoring of the program was done. No course correction was made. After vaccination, the girls were dumped with no follow up.” [emphasis added]
All girls were vaccinated by the U.S.-based NGO (Non-Government Organization) and PATH (Program for Appropriate Technology in Health).
As stated in the petition, the project was discontinued only after several women’s organizations reported:
Deaths among the participants
The use of vulnerable population
Lack of informed consent
The petitioners accused project leaders of falsification of the records and stated that the project had been carried out with severe lack of monitoring, stating that PATH and the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) as well as state authorities covered up the adverse effects and deaths that have been described in the petition.
In an interview, Kalpana Mehta told us that there had been gross anomalies in the death-related documentation, indicating a cover-up and that even the age of the girls who died failed to match the projects records. She said:
“The dates of postmortems were poorly documented and inaccurate and instead of being written on hospital stationary many had been written on plain paper without signatures.”
The fact that there was no parental consent is truly shocking, however, when you delve more deeply into the organizations that were behind this unethical vaccination experiment, you discover the possible reasons why.
One reason could have been the fact that, according the website TECHRIGHTS, the Gates Foundation had been found to be indirectly paying scientists to exaggerate vaccination needs.
If that was not bad enough, a document found on the World Health Organization (WHO) website titled Summary of Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation-supported HPV Vaccine Partner Activities stated:
“Harvard University, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), PATH, and the World Health Organization (WHO) are undertaking activities focused on preparing for HPV vaccine introduction in developing countries. These activities, funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, represent a multifaceted, coordinated strategy for making HPV vaccines available, acceptable, and affordable to those most in need. Summaries of each organization’s goals related to HPV vaccine introduction and key milestones are outlined below.” [emphasis added]
Reading this document alone is evidence enough that the HPV vaccination experiment that took place in 2009 was largely funded by the Gates Foundation.
However, this was not the only alleged crime against the children of India that was funded by the Gates Foundation.
Children in India Given Oral Polio
It has been widely publicized that Bill Gates is on a mission to eradicate wild polio from developing countries.
In 2012, the CDC published a press release titled Update on Vaccine-Derived Polioviruses — Worldwide, April 2011–June 2012. They wrote:
“In 1988, the World Health Assembly resolved to eradicate poliomyelitis worldwide. One of the main tools used in polio eradication efforts has been the live, attenuated oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV). This inexpensive vaccine is administered easily by mouth, makes recent recipients resistant to infection by wild polioviruses (WPVs), and provides long-term protection against paralytic disease through durable humoral immunity. Nonetheless, rare cases of vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis can occur both among immunologically normal OPV recipients and their contacts and among persons who are immunodeficient. In addition, vaccine-derived polioviruses (VDPVs) can emerge to cause polio outbreaks in areas with low OPV coverage and can replicate for years in persons who are immunodeficient.” [emphasis added]
They continued:
“VDPVs can cause paralytic polio in humans…” [emphasis added]
The CDC recommended that the best way to deal with this problem is mass vaccination. They stated:
“To prevent VDPV emergence and spread, all countries should maintain high vaccination coverage against all three poliovirus serotypes.”
Immunodeficiency disorders occur when the body’s immune response is reduced or absent. In other words, governments worldwide are actively promoting a vaccine that they know will cause millions of vulnerable, sick and immunodeficient children to develop vaccine-induced polio.
In order for governments to mass vaccinate more efficiently, they are fully backing the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, a group that has made it very clear that their aim is to eradicate wild polio.
However, it appears that Bill Gates was ignorant of the fact that his efforts were causing tens of thousands of children to suffer from vaccine-induced polio.
The Rates of Vaccine-Induced Polio Soar
According to the Activist Post in 2010, the Polio Global Eradication Initiative, founded in 1988 by the World Health Organization, Rotary International, UNICEF, and the US CDC, (all organizations which are funded by the Gates Foundation) stated that there were only 42 cases of wild polio reported in India.
This all sounds impressive, until you realize that cases of vaccine-induced polio are reaching epic proportions.
In a paper published in the Medical Journal of Medical Ethics, authors Neetu Vashishi and Jacob Puliyel stated that:
“… while India has been polio-free for a year, there has been a huge increase in non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP). In 2011, there were an extra 47,500 new cases of NPAFP. Clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly, the incidence of NPAFP was directly proportional to doses of oral polio received. Though this data was collected within the polio surveillance system, it was not investigated. The principle of primum-non-nocere was violated.”
With numbers of this size being reported, you would think that someone, somewhere, would have tried to stop the devastation.
However, instead of realizing what was happening and stopping the vaccination program in its tracks, governments worldwide, have instead, continued to support Bill Gates.
However, it appears that all is not well and that India may be losing confidence in Gates’ vaccination programs. Because in 2017, it was reported that India had decided to cut some of its funding ties with the foundation. See: India cuts some funding ties with Gates Foundation on immunization.
Gates Causes More Devastation – This Time in Africa
In December 2012, in the small village of Gouro, Chad, Africa, situated on the edge of the Sahara Desert, five hundred children were locked into their school and threatened that if they did not agree to being force-vaccinated with a meningitis A vaccine, they would receive no further education.
These children were vaccinated without their parents’ knowledge. This vaccine was an unlicensed product still going through the third and fourth phases of testing.
Within hours, 106 children began to suffer from headaches, vomiting, severe uncontrollable convulsions and paralysis.
The children’s wait for a doctor began. They had to wait one full week for a doctor to arrive while the team of vaccinators proceeded to vaccinate others in the village.
When the doctor finally came, he could do nothing for the children. The team of vaccinators, upon seeing what had happened, fled the village in fear.
The original report was written in a small, local newspaper called La Voix. The newspaper stated that forty children were finally transferred to a hospital in Faya and later taken by plane to two hospitals in N’Djamena, the capital city of Chad.
After being moved around several times, many of these sick children were finally taken back to their village without a diagnosis and each family was given an unconfirmed sum of £1000 by the government. No forms were signed and no documentation was seen. They were informed that their children had not suffered a vaccine injury.
However, if this were true, why would their government award each family £1000 in what has been described by their parents as hush money?
The only mainstream news channel to have highlighted the plight of these poor children was a local channel called Tchad, which filmed footage of the then-Prime Minister of Chad visiting the children in hospital.
VacTruth, who reported on this story, owns copies of all of the original reports, along with a wide range of medical and government documents.
However, despite this evidence and VacTruth’s detailed and extensive coverage, including highlighting television footage, once again, the vaccine program was hailed a success.
The groups behind this project were PATH, WHO, UNICEF, and the Gates Foundation, and during Vactruth’s investigations, it was discovered that in fact the whole project was run by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Please see VacTruth’s video containing original footage and documents.
In a press release regarding the vaccination, the Gates Foundation stated:
“MenAfriVac is a tremendous success story for the global health community. It is the first vaccine developed specifically for Africa, and it proves that global partnerships can develop and deliver high-quality, low-cost vaccines. Ten years ago, we invested in the Meningitis Vaccine Project, an innovative model that brought together PATH, the World Health Organization, African health ministers and the Serum Institute of India today, we celebrate the result: a modern vaccine selling for less than US 50 cents per dose with the potential to end Africa’s deadly meningitis epidemics. We believe that vaccines are one of the best buys in global health. In January, Bill and Melinda Gates called on the global community to make this the Decade of Vaccines. There is no better way to launch this decade than with a new vaccine that will improve and save lives.”
However, if these disasters were not enough, it appears that the Gates Foundation struck again two years later, this time using a tetanus vaccination laced with hormone hCG.
(Human chorionic gonadotropin, or hCG, is a hormone produced naturally in pregnancy to encourage the development of the growing fetus. However, when hCG is combined with the tetanus toxoid carrier in tetanus vaccinations, it causes a pregnant woman to produce antibodies against the pregnancy and leads her to miscarry.)
Tetanus Vaccines Laced with Hormones Known to Cause Miscarriage
In 2014, doctors from the Kenyan Catholic Doctors Association discovered that the tetanus vaccinations that had been administered to 2.3 million girls and women by the World Health Organization and UNICEF had been contaminated with the anti-fertility hormone hCG.
Interestingly, this news came after it was announced that the Gates Foundation had awarded UNICEF $26 million to eliminate maternal and neonatal Tetanus (MNT) by 2005.
Full story: African Women Injected With Vaccines Laced with Anti-fertility Hormones
Sadly, by September of 2017, MG Modern Ghana reported that more than 500,000 young girls and women had become infertile, following the tetanus vaccine administered by the government in 2014 and 2015.
This was something that Dr. Ngare, who reported the situation to the authorities, had been desperate to avoid.
However, it appears that Gates and his friends were not satisfied with their efforts and so they decided to introduce a second vaccine containing hormones, to the citizens of Kenya.
Dr. Ngare Raises Concerns Over a Second Vaccine Contaminated with Hormones
In 2015, the Kenyan Conference of Catholic Bishops (KCCB) reported that they had decided to boycott the current polio vaccine program because they believed that the vaccine manufactured by the Serum Institute of India, another organization which received funding from the Gates Foundation, may contain estradiol, a derivative of the estrogen hormone, which is believed to cause infertility.
NPR news stated that:
“In Kenya, vaccine suspicion has taken its own local strain, aimed less at vaccines themselves than at the international bodies, like the U.N. and WHO, that distribute them. The distrust has been fueled by WHO’s decision to blanket Kenya with polio vaccines, well over and above routine injections, in an effort to boost population immunity. The idea is that some of the people reached by the campaign will have already been vaccinated, but some will not. The WHO says there’s no harm in giving extra vaccines to children who are already vaccinated.”
To discover why these concerns had arisen, we contacted Dr. Ngare at that time to ask him more about his fears and the concerns of the KCCB.
Dr. Ngare told Health Impact News that the KCCB first became concerned about the polio vaccination program after the tetanus vaccinations were found to be contaminated the previous year.
He explained that the KCCB had informed the government on releasing the final tetanus vaccine report in February 2015 and that their support for any future vaccination campaigns would be on the condition that joint government/KCCB testing took place before, during and post-vaccination.
As they were in the process of negotiating joint testing, they took the liberty of collecting samples from the field from the new shipment brought in for a vaccination campaign planned for April, before any immunization took place. Dr. Ngare explained that when the KCCB tested a selection of polio vaccines from the field, they discovered that two of the six vaccines tested contained estradiol.
He explained that while there have been no human studies to determine the effect that this could have on humans, in animal studies, estradiol, when exposed to males, has been shown to damage the sperm-forming mechanism in the testes.
For the full story, see:
After all of these tragedies involving vaccine programs initiated by the Gates Foundation, we believe that it is not difficult to understand why U.S. citizens have asked the White House to investigate the foundation in more detail, as Mr. Gates announces his intent to provide a COVID-19 vaccine to vaccinate the entire world, using new technology for this vaccine that has never been used before, including embedding one’s vaccination status into their skin using an invisible “tatoo” into one’s skin.
See Also:
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Book – The Vaccine Court “The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program” ORDER HERE!
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
Order here!
Make a Statement for Health Freedom!
Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children, and even adults.
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact, part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!


healthimpactnews--2020-05-10--Google — A Dictator Unlike Anything the World Has Ever Known

Robert Epstein , who received his Ph.D. in psychology from Harvard in 1981 and served as the former editor in chief at Psychology Today , is now a senior research psychologist for the American Institute of Behavioral Research and Technology , where for the last decade he has helped expose Google ’ s manipulative and deceptive practices .
He explains what got him interested in investigating the internet search monopoly in the first place : What Epstein discovered through his subsequent research , which began in 2013 , is that yes , biased search results can indeed be used to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
What ’ s more , the strength of that influence was shocking .
He also eventually discovered how Google is able to block website access on browsers other than their own .
His findings were published in 2016 in U.S. News & World Report.1 1 .
They ’ re a surveillance agency with significant yet hidden surveillance powers .
As noted by Epstein : “ The search engine … Google Wallet , Google Docs , Google Drive , YouTube , these are surveillance platforms .
In other words , from their perspective @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they give them more information about you .
Surveillance is what they do.
” 2 .
They ’ re a censoring agency with the ability to restrict or block access to websites across the internet , thus deciding what people can and can not see .
They even have the ability to block access to entire countries and the internet as a whole .
The most crushing problem with this kind of internet censorship is that you don ’ t know what you don ’ t know .
If a certain type of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you don ’ t know it should exist somewhere , you ’ ll never go looking for it .
And , when searching for information online , how would you know that certain websites or pages have been removed from the search results in the first place ?
The answer is , you don ’ t .
For example , Google has been investing in DNA repositories for quite a long time , and are adding DNA information to our profiles .
According to Epstein , Google has taken over the national DNA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which he has cited in his own writings — have all vanished .
3 .
They have the power to manipulate public opinion through search rankings and other means .
“ To me , that ’ s the scariest area , ” Epstein says , “ because Google is shaping the opinions , thinking , beliefs , attitudes , purchases and votes of billions of people around the world without anyone knowing that they ’ re doing so … and perhaps even more shocking , without leaving a paper trail for authorities to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ techniques of manipulation that have never existed before in human history and they are for the most part , subliminal … but they don ’ t produce tiny shifts .
They produce enormous shifts in people ’ s thinking , very rapidly .
Some of the techniques I ’ ve discovered are among the largest behavioral effects ever discovered in the behavioral sciences.
” While surveillance is Google ’ s primary business , their revenue — which exceeds $ 130 billion a year — comes almost exclusively from advertising .
All that personal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their various products is sold to advertisers looking for a specific target audience .
How Google Can Shift Your Perception Without Your Knowledge Epstein ’ s controlled , randomized , double-blind and counterbalanced experiments have revealed a number of different ways in which Google can shift public perception .
The first effect he discovered is called SEME , which stands for search engine manipulation effect .
For a full description of the basic experiment used to identify this effect , please listen to the interview .
In summary , the aim of his @ @ @ @ @ @ @ biased toward a particular political candidate would be capable of shifting users ’ political opinion and leanings .
Another thing Epstein noticed was that very few seemed to realize they were seeing biased search results .
In other words , the manipulation went virtually undetected .
In a second experiment , they were able to achieve a 63 % shift in voter preference , and by masking the bias — simply by inserting a pro-opponent result here and there — they were able to hide the bias from almost everyone .
What this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who actually notice the bias are not protected from its effects .
Curiously , they actually shift even further toward the bias , rather than away from it .
As evidenced by other studies , the pattern of clicks is a key factor that makes search bias so powerful : 50 % of all search selections go to the top two items and 95 % of all clicks go to the first page of search results .
Subsequent experiments revealed that this click pattern is the result of conditioning .
Most of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such as local weather or the capital of a country .
The most appropriate and correct answer is always at the very top .
This conditions them to assume that the best and truest answer is always the most high-ranked listing .
Google May Have Shifted Millions of Votes in 2016 Elections The ramifications of the search engine manipulation effect can be immense .
Of course , having power to shift public opinion is one thing ; actually using that power is another .
So , Epstein ’ s next target was to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of influence or not .
On the high end , Google ’ s biased search results may have shifted as many as 10.4 million undecided voters toward Clinton , which is no small feat — all without anyone realizing they ’ d been influenced , and without leaving a trace for the authorities to follow .
According to Epstein ’ s calculations , tech companies , Google being the main one , can shift 15 million votes leading up to the 2020 election , which means they have the potential to select the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Has the Power to Determine 25 % of Global Elections Many who look at Epstein ’ s work end up focusing on Google ’ s ability to influence U.S. politics , but the problem is much bigger than that .
A Dictator Unlike Anything the World Has Ever Known Another , and even more frightening possibility , is that Google could allow its biased algorithm to favor one candidate over another without caring about which candidate is being favored .
While this sounds like it should be illegal , it ’ s not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ regulations that restrict or dictate how Google must rank its search results .
Courts have actually concluded that Google is simply exercising its right to free speech , even if that means destroying the businesses they demote in their search listings or black listings .
The only way to protect ourselves from this kind of hidden influence is by setting up monitoring programs such as Epstein ’ s all over the world .
“ As a species , it ’ s the only way we can protect ourselves from new types of online @ @ @ @ @ @ @ us , ” he says .
“ No dictator anywhere has ever had even a tiny fraction of the power that this company has.
” Epstein is also pushing for government to make the Google search index a public commons , which would allow other companies to create competing search platforms using Google ’ s database .
While Google ’ s search engine can not be broken up , its monopoly would be thwarted by forcing it to hand over its index to other search platform developers .
In 2016 , Epstein also @ @ @ @ @ @ @ — the suggested searches shown in a drop-down menu when you begin to type a search term .
This effect is now known as the search suggestion effect or SSE .
Epstein explains : YouTube , which is owned by Google , also has enormous influence on public opinion .
According to Epstein , 70 % of the videos people view on YouTube are suggested by Google ’ s top secret Up Next algorithm , which recommends videos for you to view whenever you ’ re watching a video .
Just like the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ effective ephemeral manipulation tool .
There ’ s no record of the videos recommended by the algorithm , yet it can take you down the proverbial rabbit hole by feeding you one video after another .
Most people now have Amazon Prime .
If you are one of those who do , you can watch the following documentary for free on Prime .
It is well worth your time to do so .
Epstein and many other experts provide a very compelling overview of the dangers that we discuss in our interview .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ must-watch and one to recommend to your friends and family .
A question Epstein raises is , “ Who gave this private company , which is not accountable to any of us , the ability to determine what billions of people around the world will see or will not see ?
” That is perhaps one of the biggest issues .
Epstein and others attempt to answer this question in this documentary , “ The Creepy Line , ” which is a direct quote from Google ’ s executive chairman Eric Schmidt .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Toward Online Privacy , ” Epstein outlines his recommendations for protecting your privacy while surfing the web , most of which don ’ t cost anything .
You can access the article at : MySevenSimpleSteps.com This is one of the reasons I strongly recommend that you use a VPN on your cellphone and computer , as this will prevent virtually anyone from tracking and targeting you .
There are many out there but I am using the one Epstein recommends , Nord VPN , which is only about $ 3 per month and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ six devices .
In my view , this is a must if you seek to preserve your privacy .
How Google Tracks You Even When You ’ re Offline You can learn a lot about a person by tracking their movements and whereabouts .
Most of us are very naïve about these things .
As explained by Epstein , location tracking technology has become incredibly sophisticated and aggressive .
Android cellphones , for example , which are a Google-owned operating system , can track you even when you ’ re not connected to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ tracking enabled or not .
As soon as you reconnect to the internet , all that information stored in your phone is sent to Google .
So , even though you may think you ’ ve just spent the day incognito , the moment you reconnect , every step you ’ ve made is shared ( provided you had your phone with you ) .
In terms of online tracking , it ’ s also important to realize that Google is tracking your movements online even if you ’ re not using their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Analytics , which tracks everything you do on that website .
And , you have no way of knowing whether a website uses Google Analytics or not .
To protect your privacy , Epstein recommends taking the following steps , seven of which are outlined in “ Seven Simple Steps Toward Online Privacy.
” The last one , Fitbit , is a more recent concern .
Use a virtual private network ( VPN ) such as Nord , which is only about $ 3 per month and can be used on up to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this is a must if you seek to preserve your privacy .
Epstein explains : Do not use Gmail , as every email you write is permanently stored .
It becomes part of your profile and is used to build digital models of you , which allows them to make predictions about your line of thinking and every want and desire .
Many other older email systems such as AOL and Yahoo are also being used as surveillance platforms in the same way as Gmail .
ProtonMail.com , which uses end-to-end encryption , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ account is free .
Don ’ t use Google ’ s Chrome browser , as everything you do on there is surveilled , including keystrokes and every web page you ’ ve ever visited .
Brave is a great alternative that takes privacy seriously .
Brave is also faster than Chrome , and suppresses ads .
It ’ s based on Chromium , the same software infrastructure that Chrome is based on , so you can easily transfer your extensions , favorites and bookmarks .
Don ’ t use Google as your search @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , such as Bing or Yahoo , both of which draw search results from Google .
The same goes for the iPhone ’ s personal assistant Siri , which draws all of its answers from Google .
Alternative search engines suggested by Epstein include SwissCows and Qwant .
He recommends avoiding StartPage , as it was recently bought by an aggressive online marketing company , which , like Google , depends on surveillance .
Don ’ t use an Android cellphone , for all the reasons discussed earlier .
Epstein uses a Blackberry @ @ @ @ @ @ @ phones or the iPhone .
Blackberry ’ s upcoming model , the Key3 , will be one of the most secure cellphones in the world , he says .
Don ’ t use Google Home devices in your house or apartment .
These devices record everything that occurs in your home , both speech and sounds such as brushing your teeth and boiling water , even when they appear to be inactive , and send that information back to Google .
Android phones are also always listening and recording , as are Google @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Amazon ’ s Alexa .
Clear your cache and cookies .
As Epstein explains in his article:3 Don ’ t use Fitbit , as it was recently purchased by Google and will provide them with all your physiological information and activity levels , in addition to everything else that Google already has on you .
Nord , when used on your cellphone , will also mask your identity when using apps like Google Maps .

by Dr. Joseph Mercola
Mercola.com
Robert Epstein, who received his Ph.D. in psychology from Harvard in 1981 and served as the former editor in chief at Psychology Today, is now a senior research psychologist for the American Institute of Behavioral Research and Technology, where for the last decade he has helped expose Google’s manipulative and deceptive practices. He explains what got him interested in investigating the internet search monopoly in the first place:
“In 2012, January 1st, I received some emails from Google saying my website contained malware and that they were somehow blocking access. This means I had gotten onto one of Google’s blacklists.
My website did contain some malware. It was pretty easy to get rid of, but it turns out it’s hard to get off of a Google blacklist. That’s a big problem. I started looking at Google just a little bit differently.
I wondered, first of all, why they were notifying me about this rather than some government agency or some nonprofit organization? Why was a private company notifying me?
In other words, who made Google sheriff of the internet? Second, I learned they had no customer service department, which seemed very strange, so if you have a problem with Google, then you have a problem because they don’t help you solve the problem.
I learned also that although you can get onto a blacklist in a split second, it can take weeks to get off a blacklist. There have been businesses that have gotten onto their blacklists and have gone out of business while they’re trying to straighten out the problem.
The thing that really caught my eye — because I’ve been a programmer my whole life — was I couldn’t figure out how they were blocking access to my website, not just through their own products … Google.com, the search engine, or through Chrome, which is their browser, but through Safari, which is an Apple product, through Firefox, which is a browser run by Mozilla, a nonprofit organization.
How was Google blocking access through so many different means? The point is I just started to get more curious about the company, and later in 2012, I happened to be looking at a growing literature, which was about the power of search rankings to impact sales.
This was in the marketing field and it just was astonishing. In other words, if you could push yourself up one more notch in their search results, that could make the difference between success or failure for your company; it could mean a lot more income.
It turns out that this initial research was saying that people really trust those higher ranked search results. I simply asked a question. I wondered whether, if people trust those higher rank search results, I could use search results to influence people’s opinions, maybe even their votes.”
What Epstein discovered through his subsequent research, which began in 2013, is that yes, biased search results can indeed be used to influence public opinion and sway undecided voters. What’s more, the strength of that influence was shocking.
He also eventually discovered how Google is able to block website access on browsers other than their own. His findings were published in 2016 in U.S. News & World Report.1
Google’s Powers Pose Serious Threats to Society
Google’s powers pose three specific threats to society:
1. They’re a surveillance agency with significant yet hidden surveillance powers. As noted by Epstein: “The search engine … Google Wallet, Google Docs, Google Drive, YouTube, these are surveillance platforms. In other words, from their perspective, the value these tools have is they give them more information about you. Surveillance is what they do.” 2. They’re a censoring agency with the ability to restrict or block access to websites across the internet, thus deciding what people can and cannot see. They even have the ability to block access to entire countries and the internet as a whole. The most crushing problem with this kind of internet censorship is that you don’t know what you don’t know. If a certain type of information is removed from search, and you don’t know it should exist somewhere, you’ll never go looking for it. And, when searching for information online, how would you know that certain websites or pages have been removed from the search results in the first place? The answer is, you don’t. For example, Google has been investing in DNA repositories for quite a long time, and are adding DNA information to our profiles. According to Epstein, Google has taken over the national DNA repository, but articles about that — which he has cited in his own writings — have all vanished. 3. They have the power to manipulate public opinion through search rankings and other means. “To me, that’s the scariest area,” Epstein says, “because Google is shaping the opinions, thinking, beliefs, attitudes, purchases and votes of billions of people around the world without anyone knowing that they’re doing so … and perhaps even more shocking, without leaving a paper trail for authorities to trace. They’re using new techniques of manipulation that have never existed before in human history and they are for the most part, subliminal … but they don’t produce tiny shifts. They produce enormous shifts in people’s thinking, very rapidly. Some of the techniques I’ve discovered are among the largest behavioral effects ever discovered in the behavioral sciences.”
While surveillance is Google’s primary business, their revenue — which exceeds $130 billion a year — comes almost exclusively from advertising. All that personal information you’ve provided them through their various products is sold to advertisers looking for a specific target audience.
How Google Can Shift Your Perception Without Your Knowledge
Epstein’s controlled, randomized, double-blind and counterbalanced experiments have revealed a number of different ways in which Google can shift public perception. The first effect he discovered is called SEME, which stands for search engine manipulation effect. For a full description of the basic experiment used to identify this effect, please listen to the interview.
In summary, the aim of his experiment was to see whether search results biased toward a particular political candidate would be capable of shifting users’ political opinion and leanings.
“I had predicted, when we first did this, that we would get a shift,” Epstein says, “because … people do trust higher ranked search results, and of course we had biased the search results so that, if in that first group, someone was clicking on a high-ranking search result, that would connect them to a webpage which made one candidate look much better than the other …
I predicted we could get a shift in voting preferences of 2% to 3%. I was way off. We got … a shift of 48%, which I thought must be an error because that’s crazy …
I should note that in almost all of our experiments, especially those early ones, we deliberately used undecided voters. That’s the key. You can’t easily push the opinions or voting preferences of people who are partisan, who are strongly committed to one party or another, but people who are undecided, those are the people who are very vulnerable. In our experiments, we always find a way to use undecided voters.
In these early experiments, the way we guaranteed that our voters were undecided was by using people from the U.S. as our participants, but the election we chose was the 2010 election for the prime minister of Australia.
They’re real candidates, a real election, real search results, real webpages, and of course, because our participants were from the U.S. they were not familiar with the candidates.
In fact, that’s why, before they do the search, we get this almost perfect 50/50 split regarding who they’re going to vote for, because they don’t know these candidates. The information they’re getting from the search, that, presumably, is why we get a shift.”
Simple Trick Effectively Masks Search Bias
Another thing Epstein noticed was that very few seemed to realize they were seeing biased search results. In other words, the manipulation went virtually undetected.
In a second experiment, they were able to achieve a 63% shift in voter preference, and by masking the bias — simply by inserting a pro-opponent result here and there — they were able to hide the bias from almost everyone.
“In other words, we could get enormous shifts in opinions and voting preferences with no one being able to detect the bias in the search results we were showing them,” Epstein says. “This is where, again, it starts to get scary. Scarier still is when we moved on to do a national study of more than 2,000 people in all 50 states.”
What this large-scale investigation revealed is that the few who actually notice the bias are not protected from its effects. Curiously, they actually shift even further toward the bias, rather than away from it.
As evidenced by other studies, the pattern of clicks is a key factor that makes search bias so powerful: 50% of all search selections go to the top two items and 95% of all clicks go to the first page of search results.
“In other words, people spend most of their time clicking on and reading content that comes from high-ranking search results. If those high-ranking search results favor one candidate, that’s pretty much all they see and that impacts their opinions and their voting preferences,” Epstein says.
Subsequent experiments revealed that this click pattern is the result of conditioning. Most of the things people search for are simple matters such as local weather or the capital of a country. The most appropriate and correct answer is always at the very top. This conditions them to assume that the best and truest answer is always the most high-ranked listing.
Google May Have Shifted Millions of Votes in 2016 Elections
The ramifications of the search engine manipulation effect can be immense. Of course, having power to shift public opinion is one thing; actually using that power is another. So, Epstein’s next target was to determine whether Google is using its power of influence or not.
“Early 2016, I set up the first-ever monitoring system, which allowed me to look over the shoulders of people as they were conducting election-related searches on Google, Bing and Yahoo in the months leading up to the 2016 presidential election. I had 95 field agents (as we call them), in 24 states.
We kept their identities secret, which took a lot of work. And this is exactly, by the way, what the Nielsen company does to generate ratings for television shows. They have several thousand families. Their identities are secret. They equip the families with special boxes, which allow Nielsen to tabulate what programs they’re watching …
Inspired by the Nielsen model, we recruited our field agents, we equipped them with custom passive software. In other words, no one could detect the fact that they have the software in their computers. But that software allowed us to look over their shoulders as they conducted election related searches …
We ended up preserving 13,207 election-related searches and the nearly 100,000 webpages to which the search results linked … After the election, we rated the webpages for bias, either pro-Clinton or pro-Trump … and then we did an analysis to see whether there was any bias in the search results people were seeing.
The results we got were crystal clear, highly significant statistically … at the 0.001 level. What that says is we can be confident the bias we were seeing was real, and it didn’t occur because of some random factors. We found a pro-Clinton bias in all 10 search positions on the first page of Google search results, but not on Bing or Yahoo.
That’s very important. So, there was a significant pro-Clinton bias on Google. Because of the experiments I had been doing since 2013, I was also able to calculate how many votes could have been shifted with that level of bias… At bare minimum, about 2.6 million [undecided] votes would have shifted to Hillary Clinton.”
On the high end, Google’s biased search results may have shifted as many as 10.4 million undecided voters toward Clinton, which is no small feat — all without anyone realizing they’d been influenced, and without leaving a trace for the authorities to follow.
According to Epstein’s calculations, tech companies, Google being the main one, can shift 15 million votes leading up to the 2020 election, which means they have the potential to select the next president of United States.
Google Has the Power to Determine 25% of Global Elections
Many who look at Epstein’s work end up focusing on Google’s ability to influence U.S. politics, but the problem is much bigger than that.
“As I explained when I testified before Congress, the reason why I’m speaking out about these issues is because, first of all, I … think it’s important that we preserve democracy and preserve the free and fair election. To me, it’s pretty straight forward.
But the problem is much bigger than elections or democracy or the United States. Because I calculated back in 2015 that … Google’s search engine — because more than 90% of searches worldwide are conducted on Google — was determining the outcomes of upwards of 25% of the national elections in the world.
How can that be? Well, it’s because a lot of elections are very close. And that’s the key to understanding this. In other words, we actually looked at the win margins in national elections around the world, which tend to be very close. In that 2010 Australian election, for example, the win margin was something like 0.2% …
If the results they’re getting on Google are biased toward one candidate, that shifts a lot of votes among undecided people. And it’s very, very simple for them to flip an election or … rig an election … It’s very, very simple for Google to do that.
They can do it deliberately, which is kind of scary. In other words, some top executives at Google could decide who they want to win an election in South Africa or the U.K. or anywhere. It could be just a rogue employee at Google who does it. You may think that’s impossible … [but] it’s incredibly simple …
[A] senior software engineer at Google, Shumeet Baluja, who’s been at Google almost since the very beginning, published a novel that no one’s ever heard of called ‘The Silicon Jungle’ … It’s fictional, but it’s about Google, and the power that individual employees at Google have to make or break any company or any individual.
It’s a fantastic novel. I asked Baluja how Google let him get away with publishing it and he said, ‘Well, they made me promise I would never promote it.’ That’s why no one’s ever heard of this book.”
A Dictator Unlike Anything the World Has Ever Known
Another, and even more frightening possibility, is that Google could allow its biased algorithm to favor one candidate over another without caring about which candidate is being favored.
“That’s the scariest possibility,” Epstein says, “because now you’ve got an algorithm, a computer program, which is an idiot … deciding who rules us. It’s crazy.”
While this sounds like it should be illegal, it’s not, because there are no laws or regulations that restrict or dictate how Google must rank its search results. Courts have actually concluded that Google is simply exercising its right to free speech, even if that means destroying the businesses they demote in their search listings or black listings.
The only way to protect ourselves from this kind of hidden influence is by setting up monitoring programs such as Epstein’s all over the world. “As a species, it’s the only way we can protect ourselves from new types of online technologies that can be used to influence us,” he says. “No dictator anywhere has ever had even a tiny fraction of the power that this company has.”
Epstein is also pushing for government to make the Google search index a public commons, which would allow other companies to create competing search platforms using Google’s database. While Google’s search engine cannot be broken up, its monopoly would be thwarted by forcing it to hand over its index to other search platform developers.
The Influence of Search Suggestions
In 2016, Epstein also discovered the remarkable influence of search suggestions — the suggested searches shown in a drop-down menu when you begin to type a search term. This effect is now known as the search suggestion effect or SSE. Epstein explains:
“Initially the idea was they were going to save you time. That’s the way they presented this new feature. They were going to anticipate, based on your history, or based on what other people are searching for, what it is you’re looking for so you don’t have to type the whole thing. Just click on one of the suggestions. But then it changed into something else. It changed into a tool for manipulation.
In June 2016, a small news organization … discovered that it was virtually impossible to get negative search suggestions related to Hillary Clinton, but easy to get them for other people including Donald Trump. They were very concerned about this because maybe that could influence people somehow.
So, I tried this myself, and I have a wonderful image that I preserved showing this. I typed in ‘Hillary Clinton is’ on Bing and on Yahoo, and I got those long lists, eight and 10 items, saying, ‘Hillary Clinton is the devil. Hillary Clinton is sick’ … all negative things that people were actually searching for.
How do I know that? Because we checked Google trends. Google trends shows you what people are actually searching for. Sure enough, people were actually searching for all these negative things related to Hillary Clinton. Those [were] the most popular search terms.
So, we tried it on Google and we got, ‘Hillary Clinton is winning, Hillary Clinton is awesome.’ Now you check those phrases on Google trends and you find no one is searching for ‘Hillary Clinton is awesome.’ Nobody. Not one. But that’s what they’re showing you in their search suggestions.
That again got my research gears running. I started doing experiments because I said, ‘Wait a minute, why would they do this? What is the point?’
Here’s what I found in a series of experiments: Just by manipulating search suggestions, I could turn a 50/50 split among undecided voters into a 90/10 split — with no one having the slightest idea that they’ve been manipulated.”
YouTube’s Up Next Algorithm
YouTube, which is owned by Google, also has enormous influence on public opinion. According to Epstein, 70% of the videos people view on YouTube are suggested by Google’s top secret Up Next algorithm, which recommends videos for you to view whenever you’re watching a video.
Just like the search suggestions, this is a phenomenally effective ephemeral manipulation tool. There’s no record of the videos recommended by the algorithm, yet it can take you down the proverbial rabbit hole by feeding you one video after another.
“There are documented cases now in which people have been converted to extreme Islam or to white supremacy, literally because they’d been pulled down a rabbit hole by a sequence of videos on YouTube,” Epstein says.
“Think of that power. Again, it’s not powerful for people who already have strong opinions. It’s powerful for the people who don’t, the people who are vulnerable, the people who are undecided or uncommitted. And that’s a lot of people.”
The Creepy Line
Most people now have Amazon Prime. If you are one of those who do, you can watch the following documentary for free on Prime. It is well worth your time to do so. Epstein and many other experts provide a very compelling overview of the dangers that we discuss in our interview. In my view, this is a must-watch and one to recommend to your friends and family.
A question Epstein raises is, “Who gave this private company, which is not accountable to any of us, the ability to determine what billions of people around the world will see or will not see?”
That is perhaps one of the biggest issues. Epstein and others attempt to answer this question in this documentary, “The Creepy Line,” which is a direct quote from Google’s executive chairman Eric Schmidt.
“Traditional media have very serious constraints placed on them, but Google, which is far more penetrating and far more effective at influencing people, has none of these constraints,” Epstein says.
“There are lots of good people in [‘The Creepy Line’], lots of good data, and it explains my research very clearly, which is wonderful. It explains my research better than I explain my research. ‘The Creepy Line’ is available on iTunes and on Amazon. I think it costs $3 or $4 to watch … If you’re an Amazon Prime Member it’s free. It’s an excellent film.”
Google Runs a Total Surveillance State
In his article2 “Seven Simple Steps Toward Online Privacy,” Epstein outlines his recommendations for protecting your privacy while surfing the web, most of which don’t cost anything. You can access the article at: MySevenSimpleSteps.com
“My first sentence is ‘I have not received a targeted ad on my computer or mobile phone since 2014.’ Most people are shocked by that because they’re bombarded with targeted ads constantly.
More and more people are telling me that they’re just having a conversation with someone, so they’re not even doing anything online per se, but their phone is nearby — or they’re having a conversation in their home and they have Amazon Alexa or Google Home, these personal assistants — and the next thing they know they start getting targeted ads related to what they were talking about.
This is the surveillance problem … The point is that there are ways to use the internet, tablets and mobile phones, to preserve or protect your privacy, but almost no one does that. So, the fact is that we’re now being surveilled 24/7, generally speaking, with no awareness that we’re even being surveilled.
Maybe some people are aware that when they do searches on Google the search history is preserved forever … But it goes so far beyond that because now we’re being surveilled through personal assistants, so that when we speak, we’re being [surveilled].
It goes even beyond that, because a few years ago Google bought the Nest company, which makes a smart thermostat. After they bought the company, they put microphones into the smart thermostats, and the latest versions of the smart thermostats have microphones and cameras.
Google has been issued patents in recent years, which give them, basically, ownership rights over ways of analyzing sounds that are picked up by microphones in people’s homes.
They can hook you up with dentists, they can hook you up with sex therapists, with mental health services, relationship coaches, et cetera. So, there’s that. Location tracking has also gotten completely out of hand. We’ve learned in recent months that even when you disable location tracking … on your mobile phone, you’re still being tracked.”
This is one of the reasons I strongly recommend that you use a VPN on your cellphone and computer, as this will prevent virtually anyone from tracking and targeting you. There are many out there but I am using the one Epstein recommends, Nord VPN, which is only about $3 per month and you can use it on up to six devices. In my view, this is a must if you seek to preserve your privacy.
How Google Tracks You Even When You’re Offline
You can learn a lot about a person by tracking their movements and whereabouts. Most of us are very naïve about these things. As explained by Epstein, location tracking technology has become incredibly sophisticated and aggressive.
Android cellphones, for example, which are a Google-owned operating system, can track you even when you’re not connected to the internet, whether you have geo tracking enabled or not.
“It just gets creepier and creepier,” Epstein says. “Let’s say you pull out your SIM card. Let’s say you disconnect from your mobile service provider, so you’re absolutely isolated. You’re not connected to the internet. Guess what? Your phone is still tracking everything you do on that phone and it’s still tracking your location.”
As soon as you reconnect to the internet, all that information stored in your phone is sent to Google. So, even though you may think you’ve just spent the day incognito, the moment you reconnect, every step you’ve made is shared (provided you had your phone with you).
In terms of online tracking, it’s also important to realize that Google is tracking your movements online even if you’re not using their products, because most websites use Google Analytics, which tracks everything you do on that website. And, you have no way of knowing whether a website uses Google Analytics or not.
Steps to Protect Your Online Privacy
To protect your privacy, Epstein recommends taking the following steps, seven of which are outlined in “Seven Simple Steps Toward Online Privacy.” The last one, Fitbit, is a more recent concern.
Use a virtual private network (VPN) such as Nord, which is only about $3 per month and can be used on up to six devices. In my view, this is a must if you seek to preserve your privacy. Epstein explains:
“When you use your mobile phone, laptop or desktop in the usual way, your identity is very easy for Google and other companies to see. They can see it via your IP address, but more and more, there are much more sophisticated ways now that they know it’s you. One is called browser fingerprinting.
This is something that is so disturbing. Basically, the kind of browser you have and the way you use your browser is like a fingerprint. You use your browser in a unique way, and just by the way you type, these companies now can instantly identify you.
Brave has some protection against a browser fingerprinting, but you really need to be using a VPN. What a VPN does is it routes whatever you’re doing through some other computer somewhere else. It can be anywhere in the world, and there are hundreds of companies offering VPN services. The one I like the best right now is called Nord VPN.
You download the software, install it, just like you install any software. It’s incredibly easy to use. You do not have to be a techie to use Nord, and it shows you a map of the world and you basically just click on a country.
The VPN basically makes it appear as though your computer is not your computer. It basically creates a kind of fake identity for you, and that’s a good thing. Now, very often I will go through Nord’s computers in the United States. Sometimes you have to do that, or you can’t get certain things done. PayPal doesn’t like you to be in a foreign country for example.”
Do not use Gmail, as every email you write is permanently stored. It becomes part of your profile and is used to build digital models of you, which allows them to make predictions about your line of thinking and every want and desire.
Many other older email systems such as AOL and Yahoo are also being used as surveillance platforms in the same way as Gmail. ProtonMail.com, which uses end-to-end encryption, is a great alternative and the basic account is free.
Don’t use Google’s Chrome browser, as everything you do on there is surveilled, including keystrokes and every web page you’ve ever visited. Brave is a great alternative that takes privacy seriously.
Brave is also faster than Chrome, and suppresses ads. It’s based on Chromium, the same software infrastructure that Chrome is based on, so you can easily transfer your extensions, favorites and bookmarks.
Don’t use Google as your search engine, or any extension of Google, such as Bing or Yahoo, both of which draw search results from Google. The same goes for the iPhone’s personal assistant Siri, which draws all of its answers from Google.
Alternative search engines suggested by Epstein include SwissCows and Qwant. He recommends avoiding StartPage, as it was recently bought by an aggressive online marketing company, which, like Google, depends on surveillance.
Don’t use an Android cellphone, for all the reasons discussed earlier. Epstein uses a Blackberry, which is more secure than Android phones or the iPhone. Blackberry’s upcoming model, the Key3, will be one of the most secure cellphones in the world, he says.
Don’t use Google Home devices in your house or apartment. These devices record everything that occurs in your home, both speech and sounds such as brushing your teeth and boiling water, even when they appear to be inactive, and send that information back to Google. Android phones are also always listening and recording, as are Google’s home thermostat Nest, and Amazon’s Alexa.
Clear your cache and cookies. As Epstein explains in his article:3
“Companies and hackers of all sorts are constantly installing invasive computer code on your computers and mobile devices, mainly to keep an eye on you but sometimes for more nefarious purposes.
On a mobile device, you can clear out most of this garbage by going to the settings menu of your browser, selecting the ‘privacy and security’ option and then clicking on the icon that clears your cache and cookies.
With most laptop and desktop browsers, holding down three keys simultaneously — CTRL, SHIFT and DEL — takes you directly to the relevant menu; I use this technique multiple times a day without even thinking about it. You can also configure the Brave and Firefox browsers to erase your cache and cookies automatically every time you close your browser.”
Don’t use Fitbit, as it was recently purchased by Google and will provide them with all your physiological information and activity levels, in addition to everything else that Google already has on you.
Nord, when used on your cellphone, will also mask your identity when using apps like Google Maps.
Read the full article at Mercola.com.
References


healthimpactnews--2020-05-10--Bill Gates Offers Nigerian House of Reps $10 Million Bribe for Speedy Passage of Compulsory Coronavi

Bill Gates Offers Nigerian House of Reps $10 Million Bribe for Speedy Passage of Compulsory Coronavirus Vaccine Bill – Citizens Threaten Action to Stop It

The Coalition of United Political Parties ( CUPP ) , on Monday ( May 4 , 2020 ) , alleged that it has intercepted a human intelligence report that the Nigeria House of Representatives leadership was poised to forcefully pass the compulsory vaccine bill without subjecting it to the traditions of legislative proceedings .
In a statement issued and signed by the spokesperson of the opposition political parties , Barrister Ikenga Imo Ugochinyere and sent to DAILY POST in Abuja on Monday , the body urged lawmakers in the lower chamber to rise against impunity .
The body in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 10 million was offered by the American Computer Czar , Bill Gates to influence the speedy passage of the bill without recourse to legislative public hearing , a development they averted as anachronistic , adding that the Speaker , Femi Gbajabiamila should be impeached if he forces the bill on members .
“ Opposition Coalition ( CUPP ) has intercepted very credible intelligence and hereby alerts Nigerians of plans by the leadership of the House of Representatives led by Femi Gbajabiamila to forcefully and without adherence to the rules of lawmaking to pass @ @ @ @ @ @ @ otherwise known as the Compulsory Vaccination Bill which is proposing a compulsory vaccination of all Nigerians even when the vaccines have not been discovered .
“ This intelligence is coupled with the information of the alleged receipt , from sources outside the country but very interested in the Bill , of the sum of $ 10 million by the sponsors and promoters of the Bill to distribute among lawmakers to ensure a smooth passage of the Bill .
“ The Nigeria opposition rejects the Bill and urges opposition lawmakers in the House of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ House with these facts tomorrow at plenary and resist every plan to illegally pass the Bill .
“ We have been informed that the alleged deal on the passage of the Bill was struck during a trip to Austria a few months back while the financial support for the promotion of the Bill was allegedly received last week to mobilize for a push leading to the hurried attempt to pass the Bill by any means necessary .
“ Nigerians are reminded that at present , there is no discovered/approved vaccine anywhere in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ why the hurry to pass a Bill for a compulsory vaccine when there is none .
“ What if the world eventually does not find a vaccine or cure for coronavirus just like it has not found a cure for HIV AIDS ?
What is the hurry in passing a Bill based on speculation or is there anything else the leadership of the House would want to tell Nigerians ?
Is this bill what will stop the mass deaths and infections rising in Lagos , Kano , Abuja , Gombe , Borno , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all over the country ?
“ Is this Bill going to revive and grow the economy and reduce hunger and give us more testing kits or bed spaces ?
Is this Bill going to stop the stealing of palliatives meant for poor and vulnerable Nigerians ?
Is it true that all these noises for the Bill is all for the alleged $ 10 million ?
“ Why make a law for a vaccine that has not been discovered ?
Does it mean that Femi Gbajabiamila and the promoters have an idea of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
When nations like Madagascar are making local remedies which is working , APC is making a law to compulsorily inject Nigerians with vaccines our former slave masters have not yet discovered .
“ The plan to push the passing of the bill is evil.
” “ The Nigeria Centre for Disease Control , NCDC did not make any contributions to the drafting of the Bill and has even told Femi Gbajabiamila to suspend the Bill as the timing is very wrong but Mr. Gbajabiamila believes he can secure the silence and acquiescence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ powers been provided for the NCDC in the Bill hence he still wants to push ahead with it the passage .
“ We are saying loudly again and calling on House of Representatives to suspend this Control of Infectious Diseases Bill and await for proper input and scrutiny after the pandemic and charge all efforts towards giving the needed support to reduce the spread and find a homegrown solution.
” Read the full article at the Daily Post .
Infectious Diseases Bill : Nigerian youths blow hurt , reveal what will happen to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ under the aegis of the Coalition Against Vaccine Trial in Nigeria , CAVTIN , have issued a stern warning to the leadership of the National Assembly over the controversial ‘ Control of Infectious Diseases Bill.
’ The youths threatened to embark on all actions that are within legal means to ensure that the bill is not passed .
They also threatened to start a recall process of all the lawmakers involved in the attempt to pass the Bill .
The Coalition wondered why the House of Representatives , without warning and with malevolent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to push through what it described as a very contentious and troubling bill .
The Bill was sponsored by the Speaker of the House , Femi Gbajabiamila , and two other members : Dr. Paschal Chigozie Obi , member representing Ideato North /Ideato South Federal constituency of Imo State and Rep. Sununu Tanko Yusuf , member representing Yauri/Shanga/Ngaski Federal Constituency of Kebbi State .
In a statement signed by Alhaji Aliyu Buba Amshi , North East ; Segun Onibiyo , Secretary , Vanguards Of Democracy North Central ; Ibrahim Bunu , Middle Belt @ @ @ @ @ @ @ OYI ) , International Coordinator – Igbo Renaissance Forum ( IRF ) South East ; Sammy Brown , President , Supreme Council Of Ibibio Youths , South South ; and Eric Oluwole , Yoruba National Youth Leader ; South West , the Coalition said : “ One begins to wonder why the lightning speed to get the bill passed without being dully scrutinized by honorable members of the House , who incidentally were not presented with copies of the Wonder BILL .
“ As if that was not enough , while the citizens @ @ @ @ @ @ @ actions playing out , the same controversial bill seeking to repeal the Quarantine Act 2004 sponsored by the House of Representatives , surfaced at the Senate on Tuesday the 5th of May , 2020 , under a different title which read ‘ National Health Emergency Bill , 2020 ’ , ” the Coalition noted.
” “ We wish to state without equivocation that no matter the nomenclature of the bill , we shall resist it unless Nigerians are adequately educated and sensitized about the benefits of giving such unfettered powers to the Nigeria @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , which includes forcible administering of the COVID-19 vaccine.
” “ We , however , want to know if the vaccine trial has passed Phase 1- 3 before we jumped into offering our citizens as guinea pigs.
” “ Does Nigeria have the experience and capacity to run a candidate trial ?
“ We are not going to sound nice nor complementary in presenting our feelings about the unfortunate games that we see being played with the lives of Nigerians at this very critical time , when COVID – 19 and hardship occasioned @ @ @ @ @ @ @ upon the citizens.
” “ We are by this publication putting the government on notice that Nigerians would not be led to the slaughter like sheep , and citizens can not to be used as guinea pigs for vaccine trials.
” “ We shall resist any attempts by any individual , group of persons or organizations that would want to begin vaccine trials of any kind without first of all going through the right protocols and sensitizing the citizenry.
” The youth leaders declared that these uncommunicative gymnastics , change of document title @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the eyes of the citizens was dead on arrival .
Read the full article at the Daily Post The Christian Association of Nigeria ( CAN ) has kicked against the bill on Infectious Disease Control before the House of Representatives .
CAN , in a statement on Tuesday by General Secretary , Joseph Daramola , queried “ the rush ” to allow the bill to be passed into law with jet speed .
The Christian leadership gave reasons it was against the moves by the Nigerian lawmakers .
CAN said the bill @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the courts in Nigeria , on numerous occasions , struck out Acts of Parliaments and Legislation including Executive Orders of Governments , that were against fundamental human rights .
The body told them to : Read the Full Article at The Daily Post Bill Gates History of Vaccine Corruption Inflicting Harm and Death on Unsuspecting People in Poor Countries Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist ( kidney doctor ) , Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people .
In this autobiography she @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the current corrupt medical system from practicing real , ethical medicine .
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines , no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public .
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children , and even adults .
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact , part of the Health Impact News network .

by Samson Atekojo Usman
Daily Post
Excerpts:
The Coalition of United Political Parties (CUPP), on Monday (May 4, 2020), alleged that it has intercepted a human intelligence report that the Nigeria House of Representatives leadership was poised to forcefully pass the compulsory vaccine bill without subjecting it to the traditions of legislative proceedings.
In a statement issued and signed by the spokesperson of the opposition political parties, Barrister Ikenga Imo Ugochinyere and sent to DAILY POST in Abuja on Monday, the body urged lawmakers in the lower chamber to rise against impunity.
The body in the statement alleged that a sum of $10 million was offered by the American Computer Czar, Bill Gates to influence the speedy passage of the bill without recourse to legislative public hearing, a development they averted as anachronistic, adding that the Speaker, Femi Gbajabiamila should be impeached if he forces the bill on members.
The statement read:
“Opposition Coalition (CUPP) has intercepted very credible intelligence and hereby alerts Nigerians of plans by the leadership of the House of Representatives led by Femi Gbajabiamila to forcefully and without adherence to the rules of lawmaking to pass the Control of Infectious Diseases Bill 2020 otherwise known as the Compulsory Vaccination Bill which is proposing a compulsory vaccination of all Nigerians even when the vaccines have not been discovered. “This intelligence is coupled with the information of the alleged receipt, from sources outside the country but very interested in the Bill, of the sum of $10 million by the sponsors and promoters of the Bill to distribute among lawmakers to ensure a smooth passage of the Bill. “The Nigeria opposition rejects the Bill and urges opposition lawmakers in the House of Representatives to confront the Speaker of the House with these facts tomorrow at plenary and resist every plan to illegally pass the Bill. “We have been informed that the alleged deal on the passage of the Bill was struck during a trip to Austria a few months back while the financial support for the promotion of the Bill was allegedly received last week to mobilize for a push leading to the hurried attempt to pass the Bill by any means necessary. “Nigerians are reminded that at present, there is no discovered/approved vaccine anywhere in the world and one now begins to wonder why the hurry to pass a Bill for a compulsory vaccine when there is none. “What if the world eventually does not find a vaccine or cure for coronavirus just like it has not found a cure for HIV AIDS? What is the hurry in passing a Bill based on speculation or is there anything else the leadership of the House would want to tell Nigerians? Is this bill what will stop the mass deaths and infections rising in Lagos, Kano, Abuja, Gombe, Borno, Kaduna, Ogun, Bauchi and indeed all over the country? “Is this Bill going to revive and grow the economy and reduce hunger and give us more testing kits or bed spaces? Is this Bill going to stop the stealing of palliatives meant for poor and vulnerable Nigerians? Is it true that all these noises for the Bill is all for the alleged $10 million? “Why make a law for a vaccine that has not been discovered? Does it mean that Femi Gbajabiamila and the promoters have an idea of the vaccine and when it will be ready? When nations like Madagascar are making local remedies which is working, APC is making a law to compulsorily inject Nigerians with vaccines our former slave masters have not yet discovered. “The plan to push the passing of the bill is evil.” “The Nigeria Centre for Disease Control, NCDC did not make any contributions to the drafting of the Bill and has even told Femi Gbajabiamila to suspend the Bill as the timing is very wrong but Mr. Gbajabiamila believes he can secure the silence and acquiescence of the NCDC with all the illegal powers been provided for the NCDC in the Bill hence he still wants to push ahead with it the passage. “We are saying loudly again and calling on House of Representatives to suspend this Control of Infectious Diseases Bill and await for proper input and scrutiny after the pandemic and charge all efforts towards giving the needed support to reduce the spread and find a homegrown solution.”
Read the full article at the Daily Post.
Infectious Diseases Bill: Nigerian youths blow hurt, reveal what will happen to lawmakers
By John Owen Nwachukwu
Daily Post
Excerpts:
Youth leaders across the country, under the aegis of the Coalition Against Vaccine Trial in Nigeria, CAVTIN, have issued a stern warning to the leadership of the National Assembly over the controversial ‘Control of Infectious Diseases Bill.’
The youths threatened to embark on all actions that are within legal means to ensure that the bill is not passed.
They also threatened to start a recall process of all the lawmakers involved in the attempt to pass the Bill.
The Coalition wondered why the House of Representatives, without warning and with malevolent alacrity, could engage in a plot to push through what it described as a very contentious and troubling bill.
The Bill was sponsored by the Speaker of the House, Femi Gbajabiamila, and two other members: Dr. Paschal Chigozie Obi, member representing Ideato North /Ideato South Federal constituency of Imo State and Rep. Sununu Tanko Yusuf, member representing Yauri/Shanga/Ngaski Federal Constituency of Kebbi State.
In a statement signed by Alhaji Aliyu Buba Amshi, North East; Segun Onibiyo, Secretary, Vanguards Of Democracy North Central; Ibrahim Bunu, Middle Belt Patriotic Front; Nze Ugo-Akpe Onwuka (OYI), International Coordinator – Igbo Renaissance Forum (IRF) South East; Sammy Brown, President, Supreme Council Of Ibibio Youths, South South; and Eric Oluwole, Yoruba National Youth Leader; South West, the Coalition said:
“One begins to wonder why the lightning speed to get the bill passed without being dully scrutinized by honorable members of the House, who incidentally were not presented with copies of the Wonder BILL. “As if that was not enough, while the citizens were still trying to grasp the movie-like actions playing out, the same controversial bill seeking to repeal the Quarantine Act 2004 sponsored by the House of Representatives, surfaced at the Senate on Tuesday the 5th of May, 2020, under a different title which read ‘National Health Emergency Bill, 2020’,” the Coalition noted.” “We wish to state without equivocation that no matter the nomenclature of the bill, we shall resist it unless Nigerians are adequately educated and sensitized about the benefits of giving such unfettered powers to the Nigeria Centre For Disease Control (NCDC), which includes forcible administering of the COVID-19 vaccine.” “We, however, want to know if the vaccine trial has passed Phase 1- 3 before we jumped into offering our citizens as guinea pigs.” “Does Nigeria have the experience and capacity to run a candidate trial? “We are not going to sound nice nor complementary in presenting our feelings about the unfortunate games that we see being played with the lives of Nigerians at this very critical time, when COVID – 19 and hardship occasioned by the unplanned lockdown action has brought upon the citizens.” “We are by this publication putting the government on notice that Nigerians would not be led to the slaughter like sheep, and citizens cannot to be used as guinea pigs for vaccine trials.” “We shall resist any attempts by any individual, group of persons or organizations that would want to begin vaccine trials of any kind without first of all going through the right protocols and sensitizing the citizenry.”
The youth leaders declared that these uncommunicative gymnastics, change of document title and sleight of mouth to throw dust in the eyes of the citizens was dead on arrival.
Read the full article at the Daily Post
Infectious Disease Bill: ‘Why the rush’ – Christian leaders blast Nigerian lawmakers
By Wale Odunsi
The Daily Post
Excerpts:
The Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) has kicked against the bill on Infectious Disease Control before the House of Representatives.
CAN, in a statement on Tuesday by General Secretary, Joseph Daramola, queried “the rush” to allow the bill to be passed into law with jet speed.
“The question in the hearts of many people is this: Why the rush when the vaccine is not available yet?,” they quipped.
The Christian leadership gave reasons it was against the moves by the Nigerian lawmakers.
CAN said the bill:
“was initiated to destroy the Civil and Human Rights of Nigerians; that it prevents Nigerians from having a say in their own affairs.” “Among this denial of the fundamental human rights are: right to life, personal liberty, freedom from inhuman treatment, privacy, right to acquire/own property, freedom of movement and religion.” “These rights are held sacred and invaluable except on clearly defined occasions as provided for by the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.”
CAN reminded the federal legislators that the courts in Nigeria, on numerous occasions, struck out Acts of Parliaments and Legislation including Executive Orders of Governments, that were against fundamental human rights.
The body told them to:
“allow the Spirit of God to prevail over the primordial intentions and ambition; not to pass this controversial, nebulous and obnoxious bill into law in the overall interest of Nigerians”.
Read the Full Article at The Daily Post
See also:
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Book – The Vaccine Court “The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program” ORDER HERE!
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
Order here!
Make a Statement for Health Freedom!
Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children, and even adults.
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact, part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!