healthimpactnews--2020-06-23--Fluoride Toxicity Trial Update

Fluoride Toxicity Trial Update

The landmark federal trial pitting Fluoride Action Network ( FAN ) and others against the US EPA over water fluoridation came to a dramatic turning point Wednesday .
FAN has argued that fluoride ’ s ability to impact the mental development of both the fetal and infant brain posed an unacceptable risk to millions of Americans ( and others ) drinking fluoridated public water supplies .
The dramatic moment came when , after both sides had completed their summary statements , the federal judge surprised everyone by recognizing the key plank in the plaintiffs ’ case and undermining the key @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
“ So much has changed since the petition was filed…two significant series of studies – respective cohort studies – which everybody agrees is the best methodology .
Everybody agrees that these were rigorous studies and everybody agrees that these studies would be part of the best available scientific evidence .
The EPA appears to have applied a standard of causation , which from my read of TSCA is not accurate .
It ’ s not a proper allocation .
It ’ s not the proper standard.
” In short , after 20 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ supporters , and 70+ years of campaigning by opponents of fluoridation since its inception , Wednesday felt like a moment in time where the validity of our objections was finally recognized on a world stage .
“ While this is not a final victory for FAN it indicates a path forward to achieve that final victory .
Needless to say , we are very excited about this outcome .
We had our 7 days in court .
We had some of the best experts in the world testify on our behalf and our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in presenting our case .
Here now is the day in more detail .
The invisible science is now visible and the voiceless have been heard .
It ’ s official , it ’ s in the record , and no one can take that away.
” Here are just some of the powerful points from Michael Connett ’ s closing statement for the plaintiffs : • “ In this case , the EPA has failed in its duties to protect the public from harm.
” • “ TSCA commands that the EPA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is one unreasonable risk , to just one susceptible subpopulation , the EPA must take action to remove such risk.
” • “ We brought before your honor , world class experts of the highest order .
Experts that the EPA has consistently depended on for assessments…The EPA has based their regulations on lead and mercury on our experts.
” • “ It ’ s undisputed that fluoride will pass through the placenta into the brain of the fetus .
It ’ s undisputed that babies who are bottle fed with fluoridated water @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our population at the moment of greatest vulnerability .
It ’ s undisputed that fluoride damages the brain.
” • At the start of the trial I said there are three key questions that need to be answered .
Is there a hazard ?
Is there a risk ?
Is the risk unreasonable ?
The answer [ to all three questions ] is a resounding yes.
” • “ We have 4 high quality cohort studies .
Each has found associations between early life exposures to fluoride and lowered IQ…by around 5 IQ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ neurotoxic effects of lead.
” • “ There is no dispute that the developing brain is the most susceptible to neurotoxic side-effects.
” • “ The most likely explanation for the observed adverse effects…is that fluoride is a neurotoxin at the levels found in fluoridated communities across the United States.
” Michael Connett also pointed out that the experts the EPA relied upon , including the two Exponent employees , were not experts on fluoride , and that the agency did not call their own employees to answer key questions in the case @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s foremost expert on fluoride , Dr. Joyce Donahue , as well as Dr. Kris Thayer .
Additionally , he said the EPA never once attempted to determine an estimate of what the levels are that cause neurotoxic effects .
Connett added that the EPA witness Joyce Donohue , PhD said the National Institutes of Health funded-studies on which the plaintiffs relied were “ well conducted ” and “ warrant a reassessment of all existing ” fluoride standards .
Then Connett concluded his statement by showing the true extent of potential damage , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in fluoridated areas and over 400,000 exclusively formula-fed babies in fluoridated areas , all presently being exposed to fluoride-contaminated drinking water .
The EPA ’ s attorney started by questioning whether fluoride posed a hazard .
Early on in her closing statement , the judge stopped her—which became a very common occurrence–and said , It was at this point , that the EPA ’ s closing statement turned into a 40-minute inquisition by the judge .
First he started asking about the EPA ’ s claims that the animal studies showed fluoride to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ getting their attorney to admit that if the studies found a moderate effect in adult rats , then why wouldn ’ t there then be a prenatal and neonate effect ?
This put the EPA in a corner , causing them to ditch their line of argument and admit that the human studies are in-fact more relevant .
The judge then reprimanded the EPA for challenging the reliability of Philippe Grandjean ’ s benchmark dose , but never taking the time to calculate their own to prove their point .
EPA quickly pivoted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mexican cohorts weren ’ t applicable to the US ; probably one of the most spurious arguments we hear from proponents .
The judge intimated that he was aware of the new study out of California proving otherwise , which appeared pretty devastating to the EPA .
The judge concluded by asking one final question , After closing statements , Judge Chen immediately started sharing his views on the case and making recommendations .
This is when he said ( it ’ s worth repeating ) : Chen continued by asking the parties @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an amended petition and re-assessment by the EPA , or start a new petition and have the EPA conduct a proper review , leaving his ultimate ruling until that was complete .
To many observers , it felt as though Chen was intimating that FAN had essentially won the case , but the he was giving the EPA a chance to right their original wrongs .
Michael Connett pointed out that the EPA has dragged their feet for a long , long time ( it has been 14 years since the NRC report @ @ @ @ @ @ @ maximum allowable level for fluoride in drinking water ) .
Michael said plaintiffs were in a situation where the EPA has made a political decision not to do anything , which is why we brought this petition in the first place .
He also expressed concern that for a citizen ’ s group this is a massive undertaking , pointing out that the plaintiffs have spent 4 years building this case , and the concern is that the time and resources necessary to go through the process a second time would be prohibitive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ claimed that they couldn ’ t just re-evaluate our amended petition , because their guidelines for TSCA require an impossible burden of proof that no one could possibly meet to trigger a meaningful review .
They also claimed that the U.S. EPA does not have the resources or expertise to undertake a risk evaluation of fluoride neurotoxicity .
Judge Chen then made clear that a lack of resources is not an excuse , and said that if both parties can ’ t figure out a solution he ’ ll rule on it himself @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the power to do so .
Connett then said that we can ’ t ignore the evidence we have in front of us , and the EPA needs to do something RIGHT NOW to warn people of this risk .
This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children ’ s Health Defense , Inc. Want to learn more from Children ’ s Health Defense ?
Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy , Jr. and the Children ’ s Health Defense .
Your donation will help @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

Fluoride Toxicity Trial Update
by Rick North
Children’s Health Defense
The landmark federal trial pitting Fluoride Action Network (FAN) and others against the US EPA over water fluoridation came to a dramatic turning point Wednesday.
FAN has argued that fluoride’s ability to impact the mental development of both the fetal and infant brain posed an unacceptable risk to millions of Americans (and others) drinking fluoridated public water supplies. The dramatic moment came when, after both sides had completed their summary statements, the federal judge surprised everyone by recognizing the key plank in the plaintiffs’ case and undermining the key argument in the EPA’s case.
The judge said:
“So much has changed since the petition was filed…two significant series of studies – respective cohort studies – which everybody agrees is the best methodology. Everybody agrees that these were rigorous studies and everybody agrees that these studies would be part of the best available scientific evidence. The EPA appears to have applied a standard of causation, which from my read of TSCA is not accurate. It’s not a proper allocation. It’s not the proper standard.”
In short, after 20 years of work by FAN and its supporters, and 70+ years of campaigning by opponents of fluoridation since its inception, Wednesday felt like a moment in time where the validity of our objections was finally recognized on a world stage.
According to FAN director Paul Connett, PhD,
“While this is not a final victory for FAN it indicates a path forward to achieve that final victory. Needless to say, we are very excited about this outcome. We had our 7 days in court. We had some of the best experts in the world testify on our behalf and our lawyers, especially Michael, were brilliant in presenting our case. Here now is the day in more detail. The invisible science is now visible and the voiceless have been heard. It’s official, it’s in the record, and no one can take that away.”
Closing Statements
Here are just some of the powerful points from Michael Connett’s closing statement for the plaintiffs:
“In this case, the EPA has failed in its duties to protect the public from harm.”
“TSCA commands that the EPA not just protect the general public…if there is one unreasonable risk, to just one susceptible subpopulation, the EPA must take action to remove such risk.”
“We brought before your honor, world class experts of the highest order. Experts that the EPA has consistently depended on for assessments…The EPA has based their regulations on lead and mercury on our experts.”
“It’s undisputed that fluoride will pass through the placenta into the brain of the fetus. It’s undisputed that babies who are bottle fed with fluoridated water receive the highest doses of fluoride in our population at the moment of greatest vulnerability. It’s undisputed that fluoride damages the brain.”
At the start of the trial I said there are three key questions that need to be answered. Is there a hazard? Is there a risk? Is the risk unreasonable? The answer [to all three questions] is a resounding yes.”
“We have 4 high quality cohort studies. Each has found associations between early life exposures to fluoride and lowered IQ…by around 5 IQ points. The effect size rivals the neurotoxic effects of lead.”
“There is no dispute that the developing brain is the most susceptible to neurotoxic side-effects.”
“The most likely explanation for the observed adverse effects…is that fluoride is a neurotoxin at the levels found in fluoridated communities across the United States.”
Michael Connett also pointed out that the experts the EPA relied upon, including the two Exponent employees, were not experts on fluoride, and that the agency did not call their own employees to answer key questions in the case. He was referring to EPA’s foremost expert on fluoride, Dr. Joyce Donahue, as well as Dr. Kris Thayer. Additionally, he said the EPA never once attempted to determine an estimate of what the levels are that cause neurotoxic effects. Connett added that the EPA witness Joyce Donohue, PhD said the National Institutes of Health funded-studies on which the plaintiffs relied were “well conducted” and “warrant a reassessment of all existing” fluoride standards.
Then Connett concluded his statement by showing the true extent of potential damage, saying we have 2 million pregnant mothers in fluoridated areas and over 400,000 exclusively formula-fed babies in fluoridated areas, all presently being exposed to fluoride-contaminated drinking water.
EPA’s Turn
The EPA’s attorney started by questioning whether fluoride posed a hazard. Early on in her closing statement, the judge stopped her—which became a very common occurrence–and said,
“The way you’re framing this is not helpful. I don’t think anyone disputes that fluoride is a hazard…the critical question is at what level it poses a risk.”
It was at this point, that the EPA’s closing statement turned into a 40-minute inquisition by the judge. First he started asking about the EPA’s claims that the animal studies showed fluoride to be safe. This resulted in him getting their attorney to admit that if the studies found a moderate effect in adult rats, then why wouldn’t there then be a prenatal and neonate effect? This put the EPA in a corner, causing them to ditch their line of argument and admit that the human studies are in-fact more relevant.
The judge then reprimanded the EPA for challenging the reliability of Philippe Grandjean’s benchmark dose, but never taking the time to calculate their own to prove their point. EPA quickly pivoted to an argument that the Canadian and Mexican cohorts weren’t applicable to the US; probably one of the most spurious arguments we hear from proponents. The judge intimated that he was aware of the new study out of California proving otherwise, which appeared pretty devastating to the EPA.
The judge concluded by asking one final question,
“Under TSCA, can the court find an unreasonable risk without finding causation?” EPA replied, “Yes.”
Judge Makes Recommendations
After closing statements, Judge Chen immediately started sharing his views on the case and making recommendations. This is when he said (it’s worth repeating):
“So much has changed since the petition was filed…two significant series of studies – respective cohort studies – which everybody agrees is the best methodology. Everybody agrees that these were rigorous studies and everybody agrees that these studies would be part of the best available scientific evidence. The EPA appears to have applied a standard of causation, which from my read of TSCA is not accurate. It’s not a proper allocation. It’s not the proper standard.”
Chen continued by asking the parties whether they could discuss the possibility of an amended petition and re-assessment by the EPA, or start a new petition and have the EPA conduct a proper review, leaving his ultimate ruling until that was complete.
To many observers, it felt as though Chen was intimating that FAN had essentially won the case, but the he was giving the EPA a chance to right their original wrongs.
Michael Connett pointed out that the EPA has dragged their feet for a long, long time (it has been 14 years since the NRC report recommended that the EPA determine a new maximum allowable level for fluoride in drinking water). Michael said plaintiffs were in a situation where the EPA has made a political decision not to do anything, which is why we brought this petition in the first place. He also expressed concern that for a citizen’s group this is a massive undertaking, pointing out that the plaintiffs have spent 4 years building this case, and the concern is that the time and resources necessary to go through the process a second time would be prohibitive.
At this point, the EPA claimed that they couldn’t just re-evaluate our amended petition, because their guidelines for TSCA require an impossible burden of proof that no one could possibly meet to trigger a meaningful review. They also claimed that the U.S. EPA does not have the resources or expertise to undertake a risk evaluation of fluoride neurotoxicity.
Judge Chen then made clear that a lack of resources is not an excuse, and said that if both parties can’t figure out a solution he’ll rule on it himself, as he’s been given the power to do so.
Connett then said that we can’t ignore the evidence we have in front of us, and the EPA needs to do something RIGHT NOW to warn people of this risk.
Read the full article at ChildrensHealthDefense.org.
© 2020 Children’s Health Defense, Inc.
This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc.
Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support them in their efforts.
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-06-25--FDA could Approve “at least one” COVID-19 Vaccine Before November Election

The pharmaceutical industry ’ s marketing trade publication , FiercePharma , published an article this week where analysts predicted that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration could approve “ at least one ” new COVID-19 vaccine before the November elections .
About six months into the pandemic and about 130 days until the U.S. presidential election , COVID-19 vaccines are moving ahead at record speeds .
Now , a group of analysts predicts “ at least one ” vaccine will be approved before November 3 .
Jefferies healthcare strategist Jared Holz told MarketWatch that “ perhaps multiple vaccines ” could @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fourth quarter and quell fears of a second wave of COVID-19.
” The team cited several reasons why an approval , or emergency use authorization , may come before the November election .
For one , Trump could push the FDA behind the scenes to issue an approval or emergency authorization .
Moderna and AstraZeneca , two vaccine front-runners , have already told the analysts an approval could happen on that timeline , according to the report .
( Source . )
FDA chief Stephen Hahn , however , testified before the House @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 23 , 2020 ) , and stated that the FDA was breaking from the White House ’ s “ Warp Speed ” timeline for vaccine development , stating that “ data and science ” would drive the agency ’ s decision making .
FDA chief Stephen Hahn broke with the White House before the House Energy and Commerce Committee on Tuesday , testifying that “ data and science , ” not “ Warp Speed , ” would dictate its approval of a COVID-19 vaccine .
The Trump administration ’ s Operation Warp Speed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doses by January , but Hahn said the FDA will work on its own timeline .
( Source . )
Hahn was responding to a Congressional inquiry , with a letter being sent to him by three chairs from the House Committee on Oversight and Reform who were concerned about the safety of a “ fast-tracked ” vaccine .
( Letter here . )
The Committee on Oversight and Reform seeks information on the processes that will guide the Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) in its decisions about the development , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ coronavirus vaccines .
Scientists are racing to create a coronavirus vaccine to protect us all .
While they are engaged in their noble pursuit , we need to plan ahead .
When a vaccine candidate is ready , it will be up to you , Dr. Hahn , to decide whether it is safe enough and effective enough to be given to the American people .
We trust that you will make that decision in the best interest of the public health .
And the best way to bolster that trust is to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be made , how a vaccine arrives to that decision point , and how a vaccine will be deployed .
( Full Letter . )
This begs the question , considering that more than $ 1 TRILLION has already been spent by the U.S. Government to develop COVID vaccines , who is calling the shots here on the COVID vaccine ?
President Trump has publicly endorsed the “ Operation Warp Speed ” COVID vaccine project , which is run by a military general and medical authorities all with ties to Bill Gates .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ hand-picked man to run the FDA , coming out of a career in cancer research in Texas .
So as America and the world look to the future and a possible COVID vaccine that some doctors claim will be a new kind of DNA vaccine never before used on humans that could have devastating results with many lives lost or destroyed , will the FDA really be transparent with test results and only rely on “ data and science ?
” Because if so , such a vaccine would probably be years away @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
And if the FDA does , in fact , take this position , will President Trump , as the commentary in FiercePharma states , “ push the FDA behind the scenes to issue an approval or emergency authorization ” ?
I guess it depends on who is calling the shots .
Will the President and the FDA , or Bill Gates and his collaborators in the U.S. Government such as Dr. Fauci , Dr. Deborah Birx , CDC Director Robert Redfield , and now Operation Warp Speed Director Dr. Moncef Slaoui , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to further advance their goals of reducing the world ’ s population ?
In fact , I think it is appropriate to ask the question : Is the decision to approve this COVID vaccine a requirement for someone to be elected as President of the United States in November ?
Dr. Judy Mikovits and Dr. Sherri Tenpenny : A New COVID Vaccine Could Kill 50 Million People in the U.S. Trump Mobilizes Military to Deliver Coronavirus Vaccine – Appoints Another Bill Gates Funded Big Pharma Exec as Chief Military Advisor Unmasking Who is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the New World Order Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist ( kidney doctor ) , Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people .
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real , ethical medicine .
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to debate her in public .
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children , and even adults .
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact , part of the Health Impact News network .

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
The pharmaceutical industry’s marketing trade publication, FiercePharma, published an article this week where analysts predicted that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration could approve “at least one” new COVID-19 vaccine before the November elections.
About six months into the pandemic and about 130 days until the U.S. presidential election, COVID-19 vaccines are moving ahead at record speeds. Now, a group of analysts predicts “at least one” vaccine will be approved before November 3. Jefferies healthcare strategist Jared Holz told MarketWatch that “perhaps multiple vaccines” could get FDA authorizations “early in the fourth quarter and quell fears of a second wave of COVID-19.” The team cited several reasons why an approval, or emergency use authorization, may come before the November election. For one, Trump could push the FDA behind the scenes to issue an approval or emergency authorization. Moderna and AstraZeneca, two vaccine front-runners, have already told the analysts an approval could happen on that timeline, according to the report. (Source.)
FDA chief Stephen Hahn, however, testified before the House Energy and Commerce Committee yesterday (June 23, 2020), and stated that the FDA was breaking from the White House’s “Warp Speed” timeline for vaccine development, stating that “data and science” would drive the agency’s decision making.
FDA chief Stephen Hahn broke with the White House before the House Energy and Commerce Committee on Tuesday, testifying that “data and science,” not “Warp Speed,” would dictate its approval of a COVID-19 vaccine. The Trump administration’s Operation Warp Speed vaccine program aims to deliver 300 million doses by January, but Hahn said the FDA will work on its own timeline. (Source.)
Hahn was responding to a Congressional inquiry, with a letter being sent to him by three chairs from the House Committee on Oversight and Reform who were concerned about the safety of a “fast-tracked” vaccine. (Letter here.)
Dear Commissioner Hahn: The Committee on Oversight and Reform seeks information on the processes that will guide the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in its decisions about the development, review, and deployment of any eventual coronavirus vaccines. Scientists are racing to create a coronavirus vaccine to protect us all. While they are engaged in their noble pursuit, we need to plan ahead. When a vaccine candidate is ready, it will be up to you, Dr. Hahn, to decide whether it is safe enough and effective enough to be given to the American people. We trust that you will make that decision in the best interest of the public health. And the best way to bolster that trust is to create transparency in how that decision will be made, how a vaccine arrives to that decision point, and how a vaccine will be deployed. (Full Letter.)
This begs the question, considering that more than $1 BILLION has already been spent by the U.S. Government to develop COVID vaccines, who is calling the shots here on the COVID vaccine?
President Trump has publicly endorsed the “Operation Warp Speed” COVID vaccine project, which is run by a military general and medical authorities all with ties to Bill Gates.
Stephen Hahn is President Trump’s hand-picked man to run the FDA, coming out of a career in cancer research in Texas.
So as America and the world look to the future and a possible COVID vaccine that some doctors claim will be a new kind of DNA vaccine never before used on humans that could have devastating results with many lives lost or destroyed, will the FDA really be transparent with test results and only rely on “data and science?” Because if so, such a vaccine would probably be years away, and certainly not within this year.
And if the FDA does, in fact, take this position, will President Trump, as the commentary in FiercePharma states, “push the FDA behind the scenes to issue an approval or emergency authorization”?
I guess it depends on who is calling the shots. Will the President and the FDA, or Bill Gates and his collaborators in the U.S. Government such as Dr. Fauci, Dr. Deborah Birx, CDC Director Robert Redfield, and now Operation Warp Speed Director Dr. Moncef Slaoui, be the ones to make the decision to further advance their goals of reducing the world’s population?
In fact, I think it is appropriate to ask the question: Is the decision to approve this COVID vaccine a requirement for someone to be elected as President of the United States in November?
See Also:
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.
See Also:
Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Book – The Vaccine Court “The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program” ORDER HERE!
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
Order here!
Make a Statement for Health Freedom!
Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children, and even adults.
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact, part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!


healthimpactnews--2020-06-24--Largest Settlement in Pharma History: Bayer-Monsanto Agrees to $10B Settlement With Victims Poisoned

Largest Settlement in Pharma History: Bayer-Monsanto Agrees to $10B Settlement With Victims Poisoned by Roundup Weedkiller

Bayer-Monsanto Agrees to $ 10B Settlement With Victims Poisoned by Roundup Weedkiller WASHINGTON – In a settlement reached today , Bayer AG agreed to pay $ 10 billion over claims its signature herbicide Roundup causes cancer in people , according to a report by Reuters .
The $ 10 billion settlement will be apportioned to four leading plaintiffs ’ law firms , who will in turn distribute the money to nearly 100,000 clients who were stricken with cancer after prolonged use of the toxic weedkiller .
The German company acquired the St. Louis-based agrochemical giant Monsanto in 2018 for $ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ thousands of lawsuits filed by people who claim exposure to Roundup and its main ingredient glyphosate was the cause of their cancer .
EWG President Ken Cook made this statement on the settlement : Today ’ s settlement is vindication for all those who have fallen ill with cancer as a result of being exposed to this chemical .
No amount of money can reverse the damage Bayer-Monsanto has inflicted on these victims and countless others , but because of their and their attorneys ’ tireless fight for justice , the company that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ price for its duplicitous deception .
The most damning revelations in this case uncovered , through the company ’ s own internal documents , the extent to which Monsanto-Bayer recognized early on the risk of cancer and other health problems posed by glyphosate and its commercial formulations .
Monsanto-Bayer aggressively conspired for decades to withhold or lie about the evidence to the public and to regulators , while relentlessly attacking scientists and organizations that sought to tell the truth about the company ’ s products .
This damning information only became public because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the company in court and made it public .
That coverup killed the company ’ s integrity as systemically as its chemicals kill plants .
Monsanto-Bayer ’ s dissembling for profit at the expense of public health is a permanent stain on its reputation .
Nothing in this settlement amends the conclusion that this is a company that simply can not be trusted .
Glyphosate , the most widely used herbicide in the world , was classified in 2015 by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as “ probably carcinogenic ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ was also listed by the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment as a chemical known to the state to cause cancer .
Glyphosate is mostly applied to corn , soybean and wheat crops , but is increasingly sprayed just before harvest on oats , chickpeas and other crops as a drying agent , or desiccant , to speed the harvest .
The pre-harvest use is why many oat-based cereals are contaminated with glyphosate .
Three separate rounds of laboratory tests commissioned by EWG in 2018 and 2019 found glyphosate in nearly every @ @ @ @ @ @ @ foods marketed to children .
The contaminated brands included cereals and breakfast bars made by General Mills and Quaker .
A new EWG testing report , coming next month , will show glyphosate contamination widespread in hummus and chickpeas .
Besides its use in agriculture , millions of Americans spray Roundup on their yards and gardens – a main source of exposure for those who were sickened and sued Bayer-Monsanto .
Four people in California have already won their cases in jury trials , including Dewayne Johnson , a Bay Area school groundskeeper @ @ @ @ @ @ @ congratulate those who made this day possible , millions of people are being exposed to glyphosate through the food they eat , working as groundskeepers or farmworkers , or gardening at home , ” Cook said .
“ Bayer-Monsanto must be held accountable beyond today ’ s settlement , The Food and Drug Administration must immediately eliminate its use as a pre-harvest desiccant , and the Environmental Protection Agency must ban all home uses .
That is the only way to assure future generations of Americans do not get sick or die from @ @ @ @ @ @ @

Bayer-Monsanto Agrees to $10B Settlement With Victims Poisoned by Roundup Weedkiller
by Alex Formuzis
The Environmental Working Group
WASHINGTON – In a settlement reached today, Bayer AG agreed to pay $10 billion over claims its signature herbicide Roundup causes cancer in people, according to a report by Reuters.
The $10 billion settlement will be apportioned to four leading plaintiffs’ law firms, who will in turn distribute the money to nearly 100,000 clients who were stricken with cancer after prolonged use of the toxic weedkiller.
The German company acquired the St. Louis-based agrochemical giant Monsanto in 2018 for $63 billion, and inherited liability in thousands of lawsuits filed by people who claim exposure to Roundup and its main ingredient glyphosate was the cause of their cancer.
EWG President Ken Cook made this statement on the settlement:
Today’s settlement is vindication for all those who have fallen ill with cancer as a result of being exposed to this chemical. No amount of money can reverse the damage Bayer-Monsanto has inflicted on these victims and countless others, but because of their and their attorneys’ tireless fight for justice, the company that exposed them is now paying a heavy price for its duplicitous deception. The most damning revelations in this case uncovered, through the company’s own internal documents, the extent to which Monsanto-Bayer recognized early on the risk of cancer and other health problems posed by glyphosate and its commercial formulations. Monsanto-Bayer aggressively conspired for decades to withhold or lie about the evidence to the public and to regulators, while relentlessly attacking scientists and organizations that sought to tell the truth about the company’s products. This damning information only became public because plaintiff’s lawyers pried it out of the company in court and made it public. That coverup killed the company’s integrity as systemically as its chemicals kill plants. Monsanto-Bayer’s dissembling for profit at the expense of public health is a permanent stain on its reputation. Nothing in this settlement amends the conclusion that this is a company that simply cannot be trusted.
Glyphosate, the most widely used herbicide in the world, was classified in 2015 by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as “probably carcinogenic” to people. In 2017, glyphosate was also listed by the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment as a chemical known to the state to cause cancer.
Glyphosate is mostly applied to corn, soybean and wheat crops, but is increasingly sprayed just before harvest on oats, chickpeas and other crops as a drying agent, or desiccant, to speed the harvest. The pre-harvest use is why many oat-based cereals are contaminated with glyphosate.
Three separate rounds of laboratory tests commissioned by EWG in 2018 and 2019 found glyphosate in nearly every sample of popular oat-based cereals and other foods marketed to children. The contaminated brands included cereals and breakfast bars made by General Mills and Quaker.
A new EWG testing report, coming next month, will show glyphosate contamination widespread in hummus and chickpeas.
Besides its use in agriculture, millions of Americans spray Roundup on their yards and gardens – a main source of exposure for those who were sickened and sued Bayer-Monsanto. Four people in California have already won their cases in jury trials, including Dewayne Johnson, a Bay Area school groundskeeper.
“Even as we celebrate and congratulate those who made this day possible, millions of people are being exposed to glyphosate through the food they eat, working as groundskeepers or farmworkers, or gardening at home,” Cook said. “Bayer-Monsanto must be held accountable beyond today’s settlement, The Food and Drug Administration must immediately eliminate its use as a pre-harvest desiccant, and the Environmental Protection Agency must ban all home uses. That is the only way to assure future generations of Americans do not get sick or die from exposure to this cancer-causing chemical.”
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-06-25--Dr. Fauci and the NIH’s History in Experimenting on Foster Children and Using Aborted Fetal Tissue t

Dr. Fauci and the NIH’s History in Experimenting on Foster Children and Using Aborted Fetal Tissue to Develop an HIV Vaccine

When we started MedicalKidnap.com in 2014 , one of the shocking things we learned was that it was perfectly legal for medical researchers to use foster children as lab rats to develop drugs .
Once the state takes custody of a child away from the parents , and the child becomes a ward of the state , medical researchers no longer need parental approval to conduct medical research , and they can also bill the U.S. Government directly to fund this research , usually using Medicaid , even if they drugs being used are experimental and have not yet been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an article in May of 2015 highlighting this horrible practice that is legal in the U.S. See : Medical Kidnapping in the U.S. – Kidnapping Children for Drug Trials Some highlights from that article : The U.S. federal government has mandated drug research with children .
The need for children to participate in drug company research is high , and the temptation to overstep parental rights to force children to participate is great .
Researchers publicly admit using money and other rewards to obtain participation of children in their drug trials .
Organizations @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to make decisions regarding their children ’ s healthcare are finding that foster children in CPS custody are being enrolled in drug experiments without parental approval .
State Child Protective Services are enrolling children in drug experiments without parental approval or court orders .
However , those who conduct these drug experiments for pharmaceutical companies , and those who are charged with monitoring such research , do not see a problem with their recruitment methods .
In a 2011 article in the Journal Pediatrics , researchers discussed the problem of recruiting children for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Researchers from Ohio State University ( Columbus ) and Case Western Reserve University , confirm that the US federal government is mandating that children be included in clinical research studies .
Since 1994 , federal guidelines have called for the inclusion of children in clinical studies .
Related federal incentives and laws such as the “ pediatric rule ” ( the Pediatric Research Equity Act ) and the pediatric exclusivity provision have also been passed to increase the number of pediatric clinical trials launched by pharmaceutical companies .
Despite these mandates , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ federal and private research and development budgets have remained limited .
In addition , pediatric researchers continue to experience difficulty locating children and families who are willing to enroll in clinical trials .
Recruitment for pediatric studies is hampered by several factors including ethical concerns with using children as subjects , regulatory oversight that is significantly more restrictive for child trials than for adult trials , a lack of research infrastructure , the need to obtain consent from parents , and the challenge of determining appropriate payments for participation that are not coercive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the title “ Protections for Foster Children Enrolled in Clinical Trials ” was held by the U.S. House of Representatives .
The Subcommittee on Human Resources of the Committee on Ways and Means , investigated whether adequate safeguards were in place to protect foster children from being forced to participate in drug studies .
The allegation that they were investigating involved clinical drug trials on AIDS drugs that were conducted during the period from the late 1980s through 2001 .
Since publishing this article back in 2015 , much more information has come @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the COVID Plandemic of 2020 .
The same group of people who have been involved in HIV/AIDS research to develop an HIV vaccine , a vaccine which has never come to market , are the same group of people now working with the U.S. Government to develop a COVID vaccine .
The public has a right to know more about the past research to develop an HIV vaccine , and how they experimented on children who who were “ legally ” kidnapped from their families for research purposes , as well as the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ try and create “ humanized mice ” to produce this vaccine , since this is the same group that has been given hundreds of billions of dollars by the U.S. Government to now develop a COVID vaccine .
Dr. Fauci and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Use of Foster Children in Developing an HIV Vaccine Faith Dyson recently published an article on Facebook titled : What Was Fauci ’ s Role In Funding Tuskgegee-Like AIDS Experiments On Foster Children In Seven U.S. States ?
She relies heavily on the work @ @ @ @ @ @ @ his research published in the book , The House That AIDS Built , which can be found online here .
As we found out in our own investigative report back in 2015 , Congress knew about these medical experiments being conducted on foster children and conducted a hearing in 2005 , with the title “ Protections for Foster Children Enrolled in Clinical Trials.
” The transcript of these hearings used to be on the House.gov website , but since we published our article it has been removed .
A copy can be found @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on Human Resources of the Committee on Ways and Means , U.S. House of Representatives met to examine this problem , Chairman Wally Herger , Representative from California made this statement : The first witness to testify before the House subcommittee was Dr. Donald Young , M.D.
, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services , Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation .
He provided extensive testimony regarding governmental oversight .
Dr. Young concluded his remarks by stating : Later in the hearing , Dr. Young was asked if any changes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and their participation in drug experimentation .
Dr. Young stated : It appears that this Congressional hearing , while acknowledging that foster children were being enrolled in HIV/AIDS vaccine trials , did nothing to stop it .
Liam Scheff details what some of these foster children went through in his book .
In New York ’ s Washington Heights is a 4-story brick building called Incarnation Children ’ s Center ( ICC ) .
This former convent houses a revolving stable of children who ’ ve been removed from their own homes by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ] .
These children are black , Hispanic and poor .
Once taken into ICC , the children become subjects of drug trials sponsored by NIAID ( National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Disease , a division of the NIH ) , NICHD ( the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development ) in conjunction with some of the world ’ s largest pharmaceutical companies – GlaxoSmithKline , Pfizer , Genentech , Chiron/Biocine and others .
The drugs being given to the children are toxic – they ’ re known to cause @ @ @ @ @ @ @ marrow death , bodily deformations , brain damage and fatal skin disorders .
If the children refuse the drugs , they ’ re held down and have them force fed .
If the children continue to resist , they ’ re taken to Columbia Presbyterian hospital where a surgeon puts a plastic tube through their abdominal wall into their stomachs .
From then on , the drugs are injected directly into their intestines .
In 2003 , two children , ages 6 and 12 , had debilitating strokes due to drug toxicities .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ died shortly after .
Another 14-year old died recently .
An 8-year-old boy had two plastic surgeries to remove large , fatty , drug-induced lumps from his neck .
This isn ’ t science fiction .
This is AIDS research .
The children at ICC were born to mothers who tested HIV positive , or who themselves tested positive .
However , neither parents nor children were told a crucial fact — HIV tests are extremely inaccurate .
The HIV test cross-reacts with nearly seventy commonly-occurring conditions , giving false positive results .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , hepatitis , tuberculosis , drug abuse , inoculations and most troublingly , current and prior pregnancy .
This is a double inaccuracy , because the factors that cause false positives in pregnant mothers can be passed to their children – who are given the same false diagnosis .
Most of us have never heard this before .
It ’ s undoubtedly the biggest secret in medicine .
However , it ’ s well known among HIV researchers that HIV tests are extremely inaccurate – but the researchers don ’ t tell the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ t tell the children at ICC , who serve as test animals for the next generation of AIDS drugs .
ICC is run by Columbia University ’ s Presbyterian Hospital in affiliation with Catholic Home Charities through the Archdiocese of New York .
Does the issue of “ inaccurate tests ” sound familiar ?
It should , because we are seeing the exact same thing today with COVID tests .
Faith Dyson writes about her reaction after reading Liam Scheff ’ s reports : When I read the report , I was much @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of NIAID ; its director , funding , etc .
and I doubt at that time there were very many other people who would have known who was in charge of the Agency outside of government bureaucrats , scientists , researchers , activists and possibly those who were affected by ‘ the AIDS/HIV virus ’ .
What ’ s interesting to note here is that the source and/or existence of that pandemic is another highly questionable subject , because it appears to mimic the same scenario that accompanies the latest super-bug to attack @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Coronavirus .
In fact – they ’ re so much alike , one would think the exact same plan had been followed in the production of both epidemics ; the older one , AIDS/HIV , using monkeys and the newer one , Corona , using bats .
( See link # 3 for a shocking revelation re : active viruses in childhood vaccines that cause AIDS , Cancer , and Leukemia plus a host of other diseases and disorders and see # 4 for the traumatic details of how the effects are still @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Therefore – due to the results of the AIDS/HIV epidemic , those most affected by it had been demanding – from the same government Agency and pharmaceutical companies – some sort of treatment , vaccine , drug , etc .
to stem the tide of the infection .
So the big question back then was : “ Where could Big Pharma and NIAID find lab rats to whom they could offer ‘ free medical care ’ in the guise of ‘ helping to prevent and/or remedy their suffering ’ all the while using @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – without being bothered from outside interference , the same as was done in the infamous Tuskgegee Syphilis Experiment ?
” ( See link # 5 . )
As Liam Scheff uncovered – the answer to their mad scientific prayers was the unsupervised and unprotected wards of the state , a.k.a .
‘ Foster children ’ .
However – since the newest pandemic has arisen to overshadow all others , and we now have a much larger group of people demanding the same provisions from the same corporations and Government Agency , we @ @ @ @ @ @ @ NIAID .
It ’ s Dr. Anthony Fauci , one of the lead members of the Trump Administration ’ s White House Coronavirus Task Force addressing the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States .
So a recap of the facts we ’ ve learned from the corona outbreak – in conjunction with the AIDS/HIV funding that spawned the experiments at Incarnation Children ’ s Center and elsewhere – are as follows : 1 ) Dr. Fauci has been the director of NIAID , a division of The Executive Branch of The U.S. Government @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also director during the Incarnation Children ’ s Center Experiments , 2 ) his NIAID profile states that he still currently “ oversees an extensive research portfolio of basic and applied research to prevent , diagnose , and treat established infectious diseases such as HIV/AIDS , respiratory infections , diarrheal diseases , tuberculosis and malaria as well as emerging diseases such as Ebola and Zika.
” ( See link # 6 ) , 3 ) Fauci participates in Gate-sponsored Global Health Conferences and is listed on The Leadership Council for The Bill And @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 7 and # 8 . )
, which has a huge stake in the profits from a Vaccine , Contact Tracing , microchipping , and various other technologies , 4 ) NIAID illegally outsourced $ 3.7 Million in U.S. Tax-payer ’ s money to Chinese scientists in the Wuhan Lab at the center of the Coronavirus outbreak for researching its ‘ gain of function ’ – after a moratorium had called a halt to all U.S. involvement in such studies .
( See link # 9 . )
and , 5 ) Fauci @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at Georgetown University : “ [ … ] , but also there will be a surprise outbreak [ … ] , and the history of the last 32 years that I ’ ve been the director of NIAID will tell the next administration that there ’ s no doubt in anyone ’ s mind that they will be faced with the challenges that their predecessors were faced with ” – in a battle with a pandemic of infectious disease .
( See link # 10 ) Read the entire article by Faith Dyson @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Obtain Records on Purchases of “ Fresh and Never Frozen ” Fetus Parts for HIV/AIDS Research Last week we published an interview between Robert F. Kennedy , Jr. and Dr. Theresa Deisher regarding the use of human fetal tissue to culture viruses for vaccines .
Most of the COVID vaccines being developed are using human fetal tissue to culture the coronavirus .
One of the more interesting questions Mr. Kennedy asked Dr. Deisher was why the manufacturers of vaccines switched from exclusively using animal tissue to culture viruses for vaccines , to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ back .
Dr. Deisher ’ s reply was that the industry was getting a lot of pressure from the animal rights movement to stop using animals for experimentation .
Earlier this week , June 23 , 2020 , Judicial Watch announced that they had obtained records showing that the FDA paid for “ Fresh and Never Frozen ” human fetal parts for use in “ Humanized Mice ” creation in the past for HIV/AIDS research .
The lawsuit can be read here .
The Trump Administration put a ban on using aborted human @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but during the COVID Plandemic some members of Congress petitioned to get an exemption for COVID-19 research .
( Source . )
HIV/AIDS DNA Vaccine now a COVID DNA Vaccine Project – Same People , Same Methods Having failed at their attempts to develop a DNA altering vaccine for HIV/AIDS , the same group of people are now collecting BILLIONS of dollars of U.S. funding to develop a COVID DNA altering vaccine .
It looks a lot like the same play book , only this time it is on “ Warp Speed ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fresh fetal tissue to create “ humanized mice ” they have the FDA ’ s approval to conduct trials directly on humans , with no animal testing first .
What will be the results ?
Unmasking Who is Behind the Plandemic and Rioting to Usher in the New World Order 7 Billion Doses of COVID-19 Vaccine for World ’ s Population of 7 Billion – Was This the Plan All Along ?
Dr. Judy Mikovits and Dr. Sherri Tenpenny : A New COVID Vaccine Could Kill 50 Million People in the U.S .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Copyright 2020 Health Impact News .
Free to republish using Creative Common standards with correct author attribution and links back to this original article .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed Medical Kidnapping : A Threat to Every Family in America T-Shirt See : Medical Kidnapping : A Threat to Every Family in America Today Help spread the awareness of Medical Kidnapping by wearing the Medical Kidnapping t-shirt !
Support the cause of MedicalKidnap.com , which is part of the Health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ against Medical Kidnapping by purchasing our new book !
If you know people who are skeptical and can not believe that medical kidnapping happens in the U.S. today , this is the book for them !
Backed with solid references and real life examples , they will not be able to deny the plain evidence before them , and will become better educated on this topic that is destroying the American family .
2 Books Retail : $ 49.98 ( for 2 books ) FREE Shipping Available !
Now : $ 19.99 ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
When we started MedicalKidnap.com in 2014, one of the shocking things we learned was that it was perfectly legal for medical researchers to use foster children as lab rats to develop drugs. Once the state takes custody of a child away from the parents, and the child becomes a ward of the state, medical researchers no longer need parental approval to conduct medical research, and they can also bill the U.S. Government directly to fund this research, usually using Medicaid, even if the drugs being used are experimental and have not yet been approved by the FDA.
We published an article in May of 2015 highlighting this horrible practice that is legal in the U.S. See:
Some highlights from that article:
The U.S. federal government has mandated drug research with children. The need for children to participate in drug company research is high, and the temptation to overstep parental rights to force children to participate is great. Researchers publicly admit using money and other rewards to obtain participation of children in their drug trials. Organizations that advocate for the rights of parents to make decisions regarding their children’s healthcare are finding that foster children in CPS custody are being enrolled in drug experiments without parental approval. State Child Protective Services are enrolling children in drug experiments without parental approval or court orders. However, those who conduct these drug experiments for pharmaceutical companies, and those who are charged with monitoring such research, do not see a problem with their recruitment methods. In a 2011 article in the Journal Pediatrics, researchers discussed the problem of recruiting children for participation in clinical trials for drug testing. Researchers from Ohio State University (Columbus) and Case Western Reserve University, confirm that the US federal government is mandating that children be included in clinical research studies. Dr. Tishler, PhD, and Dr. Staats Reiss, PhD stated: Since 1994, federal guidelines have called for the inclusion of children in clinical studies. Related federal incentives and laws such as the “pediatric rule” (the Pediatric Research Equity Act) and the pediatric exclusivity provision have also been passed to increase the number of pediatric clinical trials launched by pharmaceutical companies. Despite these mandates, the allocations to pediatric clinical trials in federal and private research and development budgets have remained limited. In addition, pediatric researchers continue to experience difficulty locating children and families who are willing to enroll in clinical trials. Recruitment for pediatric studies is hampered by several factors including ethical concerns with using children as subjects, regulatory oversight that is significantly more restrictive for child trials than for adult trials, a lack of research infrastructure, the need to obtain consent from parents, and the challenge of determining appropriate payments for participation that are not coercive. In 2005, a hearing with the title “Protections for Foster Children Enrolled in Clinical Trials” was held by the U.S. House of Representatives. The Subcommittee on Human Resources of the Committee on Ways and Means, investigated whether adequate safeguards were in place to protect foster children from being forced to participate in drug studies. The allegation that they were investigating involved clinical drug trials on AIDS drugs that were conducted during the period from the late 1980s through 2001.
Since publishing this article back in 2015, much more information has come to surface, especially in light of the COVID Plandemic of 2020. The same group of people who have been involved in HIV/AIDS research to develop an HIV vaccine, a vaccine which has never come to market, are the same group of people now working with the U.S. Government to develop a COVID vaccine.
The public has a right to know more about the past research to develop an HIV vaccine, and how they experimented on children who were “legally” kidnapped from their families for research purposes, as well as the live aborted fetuses that were used to try and create “humanized mice” to produce this vaccine, since this is the same group that has been given hundreds of millions of dollars by the U.S. Government to now develop a COVID vaccine.
Dr. Fauci and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Use of Foster Children in Developing an HIV Vaccine
Faith Dyson recently published an article on Facebook titled: What Was Fauci’s Role In Funding Tuskgegee-Like AIDS Experiments On Foster Children In Seven U.S. States?
She relies heavily on the work of investigative journalist Liam Scheff, and his research published in the book, The House That AIDS Built, which can be found online here.
In 2004 – investigative journalist, Liam Scheff, exposed the fact that hundreds of Foster children at Incarnation Children’s Center [ICC] in NYC were used and abused as lab rats for unsupervised and unrestricted AIDS research and Vaccine studies by Big Pharma and The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [NIAID]. Years later in separate investigations – 13,878 children were discovered to have been made subject of the same fate during the 1980’s and 1990’s in six other states: Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, North Carolina, Colorado and Texas.
As we found out in our own investigative report back in 2015, Congress knew about these medical experiments being conducted on foster children and conducted a hearing in 2005, with the title “Protections for Foster Children Enrolled in Clinical Trials.”
The transcript of these hearings used to be on the House.gov website, but since we published our article it has been removed. A copy can be found at Archives.org here.
When the Subcommittee on Human Resources of the Committee on Ways and Means, U.S. House of Representatives met to examine this problem, Chairman Wally Herger, Representative from California made this statement:
Over the last 18 months, this Subcommittee has heard hearings about a number of issues affecting kids in the Federal, State child welfare programs, and this issue is like many of them: It has the potential for being explosive. The child welfare program in the richest, most powerful country in the world is, and has been, often an abysmal failure. Now, we don’t need proof of more of that. We can give you all kinds of examples of it. We know about kids losing their lives in the child welfare system. Practically every State legislature every year deals with one case or another, and everybody wrings their hands, and the problems go on. The kids are sometimes locked up and sometimes starved under the supervision of the agencies. We know the children have been used without proper supervision for drug testing. (emphasis added)
The first witness to testify before the House subcommittee was Dr. Donald Young, M.D., U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. He provided extensive testimony regarding governmental oversight. Dr. Young concluded his remarks by stating:
We continue to address challenges posed by the threat of HIV/AIDS and are committed to basic and clinical research to strengthen the nation’s ability to cope with this infectious disease. The protection of human subjects, including children, in clinical trials has been and will remain a top priority for HHS. HHS is firmly committed to the protection of the rights and welfare of every individual who participates in human research consistent with sound ethical standards and regulatory requirements.
Later in the hearing, Dr. Young was asked if any changes were needed in regard to foster children and their participation in drug experimentation. Dr. Young stated:
We are not aware of any changes that we believe need to be made. If they are identified, we will be very happy to consider them and make a decision as how best to proceed. We share with you the concern about the adequate protection of foster children. At the same time, the opportunity to let them participate and get the advantage of clinical research, if that is theirs and their guardian’s decision.
It appears that this Congressional hearing, while acknowledging that foster children were being enrolled in HIV/AIDS vaccine trials, did nothing to stop it.
Liam Scheff details what some of these foster children went through in his book.
In New York’s Washington Heights is a 4-story brick building called Incarnation Children’s Center (ICC). This former convent houses a revolving stable of children who’ve been removed from their own homes by the Agency for Child Services [ACS]. These children are black, Hispanic and poor. Once taken into ICC, the children become subjects of drug trials sponsored by NIAID (National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Disease, a division of the NIH), NICHD (the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development) in conjunction with some of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies – GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Genentech, Chiron/Biocine and others. The drugs being given to the children are toxic – they’re known to cause genetic mutation, organ failure, bone marrow death, bodily deformations, brain damage and fatal skin disorders. If the children refuse the drugs, they’re held down and have them force fed. If the children continue to resist, they’re taken to Columbia Presbyterian hospital where a surgeon puts a plastic tube through their abdominal wall into their stomachs. From then on, the drugs are injected directly into their intestines. In 2003, two children, ages 6 and 12, had debilitating strokes due to drug toxicities. The 6-year-old went blind. They both died shortly after. Another 14-year old died recently. An 8-year-old boy had two plastic surgeries to remove large, fatty, drug-induced lumps from his neck. This isn’t science fiction. This is AIDS research. The children at ICC were born to mothers who tested HIV positive, or who themselves tested positive. However, neither parents nor children were told a crucial fact — HIV tests are extremely inaccurate. The HIV test cross-reacts with nearly seventy commonly-occurring conditions, giving false positive results. These conditions include common colds, herpes, hepatitis, tuberculosis, drug abuse, inoculations and most troublingly, current and prior pregnancy. This is a double inaccuracy, because the factors that cause false positives in pregnant mothers can be passed to their children – who are given the same false diagnosis. Most of us have never heard this before. It’s undoubtedly the biggest secret in medicine. However, it’s well known among HIV researchers that HIV tests are extremely inaccurate – but the researchers don’t tell the doctors, and they certainly don’t tell the children at ICC, who serve as test animals for the next generation of AIDS drugs. ICC is run by Columbia University’s Presbyterian Hospital in affiliation with Catholic Home Charities through the Archdiocese of New York.
Does the issue of “inaccurate tests” sound familiar? It should, because we are seeing the exact same thing today with COVID tests.
Faith Dyson writes about her reaction after reading Liam Scheff’s reports:
When I read the report, I was much like the general public – totally ignorant of NIAID; its director, funding, etc. and I doubt at that time there were very many other people who would have known who was in charge of the Agency outside of government bureaucrats, scientists, researchers, activists and possibly those who were affected by ‘the AIDS/HIV virus’. What’s interesting to note here is that the source and/or existence of that pandemic is another highly questionable subject, because it appears to mimic the same scenario that accompanies the latest super-bug to attack the world’s population, the Coronavirus. In fact – they’re so much alike, one would think the exact same plan had been followed in the production of both epidemics; the older one, AIDS/HIV, using monkeys and the newer one, Corona, using bats. (See link #3 for a shocking revelation re: active viruses in childhood vaccines that cause AIDS, Cancer, and Leukemia plus a host of other diseases and disorders and see #4 for the traumatic details of how the effects are still plaguing our population decades later.) Therefore – due to the results of the AIDS/HIV epidemic, those most affected by it had been demanding – from the same government Agency and pharmaceutical companies – some sort of treatment, vaccine, drug, etc. to stem the tide of the infection. So the big question back then was: “Where could Big Pharma and NIAID find lab rats to whom they could offer ‘free medical care’ in the guise of ‘helping to prevent and/or remedy their suffering’ all the while using them in AIDS/HIV drug and vaccine trails – without being bothered from outside interference, the same as was done in the infamous Tuskgegee Syphilis Experiment?” (See link #5.) As Liam Scheff uncovered – the answer to their mad scientific prayers was the unsupervised and unprotected wards of the state, a.k.a. ‘Foster children’. However – since the newest pandemic has arisen to overshadow all others, and we now have a much larger group of people demanding the same provisions from the same corporations and Government Agency, we all know who is the head of NIAID. It’s Dr. Anthony Fauci, one of the lead members of the Trump Administration’s White House Coronavirus Task Force addressing the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. So a recap of the facts we’ve learned from the corona outbreak – in conjunction with the AIDS/HIV funding that spawned the experiments at Incarnation Children’s Center and elsewhere – are as follows: 1) Dr. Fauci has been the director of NIAID, a division of The Executive Branch of The U.S. Government, since 1984, so he was also director during the Incarnation Children’s Center Experiments, 2) his NIAID profile states that he still currently “oversees an extensive research portfolio of basic and applied research to prevent, diagnose, and treat established infectious diseases such as HIV/AIDS, respiratory infections, diarrheal diseases, tuberculosis and malaria as well as emerging diseases such as Ebola and Zika.” (See link #6), 3) Fauci participates in Gate-sponsored Global Health Conferences and is listed on The Leadership Council for The Bill And Melinda Gates Foundation (See link #7 and #8.), which has a huge stake in the profits from a Vaccine, Contact Tracing, microchipping, and various other technologies, 4) NIAID illegally outsourced $3.7 Million in U.S. Tax-payer’s money to Chinese scientists in the Wuhan Lab at the center of the Coronavirus outbreak for researching its ‘gain of function’ – after a moratorium had called a halt to all U.S. involvement in such studies. (See link #9.)
and, 5) Fauci famously predicted in a speech from 2017 at Georgetown University: “[…], but also there will be a surprise outbreak […], and the history of the last 32 years that I’ve been the director of NIAID will tell the next administration that there’s no doubt in anyone’s mind that they will be faced with the challenges that their predecessors were faced with” – in a battle with a pandemic of infectious disease. (See link #10)
Read the entire article by Faith Dyson here.
Judicial Watch Sues the FDA to Obtain Records on Purchases of “Fresh and Never Frozen” Fetus Parts for HIV/AIDS Research
Last week we published an interview between Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Dr. Theresa Deisher regarding the use of human fetal tissue to culture viruses for vaccines.
Most of the COVID vaccines being developed are using human fetal tissue to culture the coronavirus.
One of the more interesting questions Mr. Kennedy asked Dr. Deisher was why the manufacturers of vaccines switched from exclusively using animal tissue to culture viruses for vaccines, to start using aborted fetal tissue some years back.
Dr. Deisher’s reply was that the industry was getting a lot of pressure from the animal rights movement to stop using animals for experimentation.
Mr. Kennedy was shocked, and stated:
It’s kind of weird to think that the animal rights activists have more clout with the vaccine companies than do the anti-abortion activists.
Dr. Deisher replied:
They do. And you know what’s really alarming is the lack of outcry over human babies born alive at five to six months old so that their hearts can be obtained beating. And they have to be beating to be used in the research that’s being done. If the heart has stopped beating, it’s not useful. You cannot use it. And so these babies are delivered alive, and their hearts cut out without anesthesia. I wouldn’t do that to a mouse….
Watch the interview here.
Earlier this week, June 23, 2020, Judicial Watch announced that they had obtained records showing that the FDA paid for “Fresh and Never Frozen” human fetal parts for use in “Humanized Mice” creation in the past for HIV/AIDS research.
Judicial Watch announced today it received 165 pages of records from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) showing the FDA between 2012 and 2018 entered into 8 contracts worth $96,370 with Advanced Bioscience Resources (ABR) to acquire “fresh and never frozen” tissue from 1st and 2nd trimester aborted fetuses for use in creating “humanized mice” for ongoing research. ABR is a non-profit firm which has been the subject of criminal referrals from House and Senate committees investigating whether Planned Parenthood or any other entity was illegally profiting from the handling of fetal tissue from aborted babies. Judicial Watch filed the lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department Health and Human Services (No. 1:19-cv-00876)) after HHS failed to respond adequately to a September 28, 2018, FOIA request seeking: All contracts and related documentation between FDA and Advanced Biosciences Resources (ABR) for the provision of human fetal tissue to be used in humanized mice research. All records reflecting the disbursement of funds to ABR for the provision of human fetal tissue to be used in humanized mice research. All guidelines and procedural documents provided to ABR by FDA relating to the acquisition and extraction of human fetal tissue for its provision to the FDA for humanized mice research. All communications between FDA officials and employees and representatives of ABR related to the provision by ABR to the FDA of human fetal tissue for the purpose of humanized mice research.
The lawsuit can be read here.
On February 13, 2020, Judicial Watch announced:
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced it received 676 pages of records from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) showing that the agency paid thousands of dollars to a California-based firm to purchase organs from aborted human fetuses to create “humanized mice” for HIV research. The records show that NIH paid at least $18,100 between December 2016 and August 2018 to Advanced Bioscience Resources (ABR) for livers and thymuses from second trimester aborted fetuses. They include at least 26 such purchases from ABR by Dr. Kim Hasenkrug, senior investigator at the NIH lab in Hamilton, Montana. Purchase orders associated with the transactions state: “These tissues, liver and thymus, are required [by] Ron Messer for ongoing studies of HIV in the Hasenkrug Lab. Our mice will be ready for reconstitution soon.”
The Trump Administration put a ban on using aborted human fetal tissue in federally funded research, but during the COVID Plandemic some members of Congress petitioned to get an exemption for COVID-19 research. (Source.)
HIV/AIDS DNA Vaccine now a COVID DNA Vaccine Project – Same People, Same Methods
Having failed at their attempts to develop a DNA altering vaccine for HIV/AIDS, the same group of people are now collecting BILLIONS of dollars of U.S. funding to develop a COVID DNA altering vaccine.
It looks a lot like the same play book, only this time it is on “Warp Speed” for fast-tracking, and instead of using fresh fetal tissue to create “humanized mice” they have the FDA’s approval to conduct trials directly on humans, with no animal testing first.
What will be the results?
See Also:
Comment on this article at MedicalKidnap.com.
Copyright 2020 Health Impact News. Free to republish using Creative Common standards with correct author attribution and links back to this original article.
See Also:
Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through
Medical Kidnapping: A Threat to Every Family in America T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton!
Order here!
Medical Kidnapping is REAL!
See: Medical Kidnapping: A Threat to Every Family in America Today
Help spread the awareness of Medical Kidnapping by wearing the Medical Kidnapping t-shirt!
Support the cause of MedicalKidnap.com, which is part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!
Support the cause against Medical Kidnapping by purchasing our new book!
If you know people who are skeptical and cannot believe that medical kidnapping happens in the U.S. today, this is the book for them! Backed with solid references and real life examples, they will not be able to deny the plain evidence before them, and will become better educated on this topic that is destroying the American family.
1 Book – 228 pages
Retail: $24.99
FREE Shipping Available!
Now: $14.99
Order here!
2 Books
Retail: $49.98 (for 2 books)
FREE Shipping Available!
Now: $19.99 (for 2 books)
Order here!