healthimpactnews--2020-06-21--Dr. Meryl Nass Discovers Hydroxychloroquine Experiments Were Designed to Kill COVID Patients – How M

Dr. Meryl Nass Discovers Hydroxychloroquine Experiments Were Designed to Kill COVID Patients – How Many Were Murdered?

Dr. Meryl Nass has uncovered a hornet ’ s nest of government sponsored Hydroxychloroquine experiments that were designed to kill severely ill , Covid-19 hospitalized patients .
On June 14th Dr. Nass first identified two Covid-19 experiments in which massive , high toxic doses – four times higher than safe of hydroxychloroquine were being given to severely ill hospitalized patients in intensive care units .
• was being conducted by the World Health Organization , on 3500 Covid-19 patients at 400 hospitals , across 35 countries .
The trial was suspended following the fraudulent Surgisphere report in The Lancet that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ patients receiving Hydroxychloroquine .
But when The Lancet retracted the report , the WHO resumed the Solidarity trialMore than 100 countries expressed interest in participating in the trial .
• experiment used very similar doses .
It was sponsored by the Wellcome Trust ( GlaxoSmithKline ) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the UK government .
The experiment was conducted at Oxford University , on 1,542 patients of these 396 patients ( 25.7 % ) who were in the high dose Hydroxychloroquine arm , died .
Update : After Dr. Nass @ @ @ @ @ @ @ WHO suspended the trial on Wednesday June 17th .
On Friday , June 19th , Dr. Nass uncovered a third , “ Even Worse ” hydroxychloroquine experiment .
REMAP targets patients who are on a ventilator , or in shock – i.e.
, near death .
Such patients are hardly capable of giving consent .
Rather than attempting to save their lives , they are being used given multiple high doses of hydroxychloroquine and other drugs whose combination is contraindicated .
Of note : All the online protocols have been stamped “ Not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ submission , ” This is an ongoing medical atrocity being perpetrated by medical doctors at 200 sites in 14 countries : include : Australia , Belgium , Canada , Croatia , Germany , Hungary , Ireland , Netherlands , New Zealand , Portugal , Romania , Spain , United Kingdom , and the United States of America .
Since all medicines are potential poison at high doses , why one wonders , are influential academic physicians and international public health institutions designing and conducting experiments that expose extremely vulnerable patients to poisonous levels @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the Swiss physician Paracelsus , “ the Hippocrates of the Renaissance ” : His insight is as relevant today as it was in the 16th century .
Dr. Meryl Nass is a physician practicing individualized medicine in Maine , in accordance with the Hippocratic Oath .
She is a longtime member of the board of the Alliance for Human Research Protection .
Friday , June 19 , 2020 Even worse than ‘ Recovery , ’ potentially lethal hydroxychloroquine study in patients near death What could be worse than giving potentially lethal doses @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The REMAP-Covid study is using the same HCQ dose as the Recovery trial for 6 days .
But it is even worse for the following reasons : • You have to be close to death , either on a ventilator or in shock , on pressor medications , to be included in the trial , according to the trial documents .
However , in a talk by Professor Anthony Gordon , HFNO , CPAP and NIV are additionally said to be inclusion criteria .
• You may receive HCQ alone , or HCQ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lopinavir/ritonavir .
Yet lopinavir/ritonavir predisposes to QT prolongation , as does HCQ , and the drug label states , “ Avoid use in combination with QTc- or PR-interval prolonging drugs.
” • Patients who are in shock or on a ventilator may be unable to give their consent to enroll in a clinical trial .
But the trial investigators have deemed that consent may not be required : “ For patients who are not competent to consent , either prospective agreement or entry via waiver of consent or some form of deferred consent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an appropriate ethical review body.
” • For patients too sick to swallow a pill , the drug will be administered via a feeding tube .
This could entail an extra procedure for patients .
This is 2400 mg hydroxychloroquine in the first 24 hrs , over 1.86 g of the “ base , ” then 800 mg/day for 5 more days or until discharge from the ICU , or 6.4 g total .
Dosing fails to take into account weight , renal and hepatic function .
The ignorant doctors who justified toxic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ ( which is 40,000 liters ) failed to notice that the high ‘ volume of distribution ’ is an artifact related to the drug accumulating in tissue as opposed to plasma .
Drug levels in lung are 200-700 times higher than in plasma .
Furthermore , WHO ’ s consultant Weniger reported in 1979 that a single dose of 1.5-2 g of chloroquine “ base ” “ may be fatal.
” A detailed discussion of therapeutic and toxic doses of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine can be found in my article of June 14 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bit less toxic than chloroquine .
But this trial studies the most fragile human beings , and if the trial investigators were unsure of the right dose , they should have “ started low and gone slow ” as clinicians are advised to do .
The REMAP study protocol acknowledges that the combination of lopinavir/ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine increases the risk of ventricular arrhythmia , but states that the risk is mitigated because patients this sick will be on cardiac monitors , with QTc monitoring .
However , it fails to say that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ torsade de points , which is very difficult to treat .
Patients who are already critically ill are unlikely to survive if it occurs .
So why use such an excessive hydroxychloroquine dose on these , or any , patients , and risk it ?
That is not explained .
The REMAP clinical trial is ongoing in 200 sites in 14 countries .
They include : Australia , Belgium , Canada , Croatia , Germany , Hungary , Ireland , Netherlands , New Zealand , Portugal , Romania , Spain , United Kingdom @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have been stamped “ Not for IRB ( Institutional Review Board ) submission , ” which makes one wonder what was changed when the trial arms were put before IRBs for approval .
Five UK chief medical officers wrote a “ Dear Colleague ” letter , begging physicians to enroll their Covid patients in clinical trials , including ‘ Recovery ’ and REMAP , and discouraging “ off-label ” treatments for Covid outside of trials .
Did they know they were asking treating physicians to significantly up the risk of death for their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of today , June 19 , the UK has had more deaths from Covid-19 than any country in the world outside the US and Brazil , with 5 and 3 times the UK population , respectively .
Why is public health being turned on its head ?
This is the third major , multicenter clinical trial of hydroxychloroquine testing toxic doses on Covid patients .
The Recovery and Solidarity trials ( with almost identical toxic HCQ doses as REMAP ) abruptly ended their hydroxychloroquine studies in the past two weeks , coincidentally as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ especially on Twitter .
Who or what is willing to maim and kill patients in order to to kill hydroxychloroquine ’ s use in Covid-19 ?
WHO and UK trials using potentially lethal hydroxychloroquine dose–according to WHO consultant , posted June 14 , 2020 The Solidarity Trial is a WHO-led conglomeration of many national trials of treatments for Covid-19 .
Per the WHO : The hydroxychloroquine arm of the Solidarity trials restarted enrolling patients June 3 , after being halted May 25 by WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Ghebreyesus and the Executive Group of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( HCQ ) arm of the trials was stopped after publication of the Lancet Surgisphere study , which claimed 35 % higher death rates in patients who received hydroxychloroquine , but the study was retracted when no one could verify that the Surgisphere database existed ) .
Below are the drugs being tested in Solidarity : However , the doses were not specified on WHO ’ s list of the drugs to be trialed , nor were the actual doses specified , surprisingly , in WHO ’ s consultation on chloroquine ( CQ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Instead , the introduction of the report of that meeting notes , Last week , I was alerted to the fact that India ’ s ICMR , its official medical research agency , had written to the WHO , telling WHO that the hydroxychloroquine doses being used in the Solidarity trial were 4 times higher than the doses being used in India .
Then I learned that Singapore has been hesitant to participate in the WHO trial , due to the hydroxychloroquine dose .
The UK “ Recovery ” trial was one part @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trials .
The trial ended its HCQ arm on June 4 , reporting no benefit .
In-hospital mortality of the 1542 patients receiving hydroxychloroquine was 25.7 % , or 396 people .
The Recovery trial Study Protocol notes it is funded in part by the Wellcome Trust and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation , and by UK government agencies .
The Protocol provides the doses of hydroxychloroquine used , on page 22 .
Twitter users began to notice a dosing issue , with hashtag # Recoverygate .
The quote from the WHO @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , seems to be deliberately vague or even misleading , as the actual dose used in the Solidarity and Recovery trials is 12 tablets during the first 24 hours ( 800mg initial dose , 800 mg six hours later , 400 mg 6 hrs later , 400 mg 6 hours later ) , then 400 mg every 12 hours for 9 more days .
This is 2,400 mg during the first 24 hours , and a cumulative dose of 9.2 grams over 10 days .
While I could not find the WHO HCQ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Investigators of the Recovery trial , Drs .
Peter Horby and Martin Landray , claimed they followed the WHO dosing .
Landray also told the periodical Paris Soir he was using the same hydroxychloroquine dose used for amebiasis .
However , the accepted use for HCQ in amebiasis is only for a liver abscess and only then in pregnancy , when other drugs can not be used .
That dose is 600 mg per day for 2 days , then 300 mg per day , less than half the Recovery dose .
Professor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s comments , but Paris Soir said Landray had confirmed what he told them in an email .
We also know , from an official Belgian guideline document issued June 8 , that high doses were used not only by Recovery in the UK , but also by the Discovery trial in the EU and by the WHO .
We also know that in Brazil , both a high dose and a low dose were trialed , and by April 17 the high dose arm was stopped prematurely due to an excess @ @ @ @ @ @ @ continues in Brazil .
How is the drug hydroxychloroquine normally used ?
For chronic daily use in systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis , patients usually receive between 200 and 400 mg daily .
In acute Q fever , 600 mg daily may be given at the start of treatment .
We also know from WHO ’ s March 13 Informal consultation on the potential role of chloroquine that the Gates Foundation had been studying the drug ’ s pharmacokinetics , and of the 25 participants at this meeting , 5 were from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dose mentioned in their report was in a paragraph about preventive doses .
It said , What is the “ base ” ?
A 200 mg dose of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine contains 155 mg “ base ” drug .
The typical 70 kg person would , if this suggestion had been followed , receive 700 mg base , or 900 mg of hydroxychloroquine , as a loading dose .
Generally , a loading dose refers only to a first dose , not to several additional doses within 24 hours , but it can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a toxic dose ?
All experts agree .
“ … chloroquine has a small toxic to therapeutic margin , ” according to .
It is very safe when used correctly in the right patients , but a bit more can potentially kill .
Prof. Nicholas White , who attended both WHO consultations on the chloroquines , has mentioned this .
The WHO hired a consultant to explore the toxicity of hydroxychloroquine in 1979 .
The consultant , H. Weniger , looked at 335 episodes of adult poisoning by chloroquine drugs .
Weniger on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of 1.5-2 grams of hydroxychloroquine base “ may be fatal.
” The Recovery trial used 1.860 grams hydroxychloroquine base ( equal to 2400 mg of hydroxychloroquine ) in the first 24 hours for treatment of already very ill , hospitalized Covid-19 patients , a potentially lethal dose .
The dose used in the Recovery trial is not recommended for therapy of any medical condition , which I confirmed with Goodman and Gilman ’ s Pharmacology textbook , the drug ’ s label , and the online medical encyclopedia UptoDate .
This excessive dose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Solidarity trials in countries around the world .
It appears that the Solidarity trials are not testing the benefits of HCQ on Covid-19 , but rather testing whether patients tolerate toxic , nontherapeutic doses .
The WHO Solidarity trials , in order to rapidly enroll patients and spare clinicians a lot of paperwork , collect only limited information on side effects .
No information has yet been provided regarding causes of death in the completed hydroxychloroquine arm of the Recovery trial , in which 396 patients died .
The Solidarity trial design being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mortality is due to drug toxicity ( in which case , one would expect cause of death to be arrhythmias such as torsade de points , neuropsychiatric effects , or hypoglycemia ) versus Covid-19 .
The WHO report of its meeting on chloroquine dosing states , The high dose regimen being used in the Solidarity trials has no medical justification .
The trial design , with its limited collection of safety data , may make it more difficult to identify toxic drug effects , compared to standard drug trials .
This is entirely @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to assess therapeutic benefit , if any , of HCQ .
Giving the drug only to hospitalized patients means that the window of time during which HCQ would be expected to provide the most benefit , when viral titers are rising , has passed .
• HCQ is being given in non-therapeutic , toxic dose • HCQ is being given too late in the disease course to determine its value against SAR-CoV-2 .
• Limited safety data in the Solidarity trials serves to protect trial investigators and sponsors from disclosure of adverse drug @ @ @ @ @ @ @ WHO has been deliberately misleading regarding the doses chosen .
• The conclusions to be drawn are frightening : a ) WHO and other national health agencies , and charities , have designed huge clinical trials to assure that hydroxychloroquine will fail to show benefit , presumably to advantage its much more expensive competitor ( s ) and vaccines in development .
b ) In so doing , these agencies and charities have conspired to increase the number of deaths in these trials .
c ) In so doing , they have conspired @ @ @ @ @ @ @ benefiting from a safe and inexpensive drug during a major pandemic .
This could lead to prolongation of the pandemic and many increased cases and deaths .
My recommendation is for WHO to immediately stop using this dosing schedule , give trial subjects clinically appropriate doses , and collect more complete safety data .
I would remind WHO that if the consent forms fail to inform patients that the dose of HCQ they may receive is much higher than for any other indication , that WHO may be subject to legal action for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ clinical trial .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

Covid-19 Has Turned Public Health Into a Lethal, Patient-Killing Experimental Endeavor
by Vera Sharav
Alliance for Human Research Protection
Dr. Meryl Nass has uncovered a hornet’s nest of government sponsored Hydroxychloroquine experiments that were designed to kill severely ill, Covid-19 hospitalized patients. On June 14th Dr. Nass first identified two Covid-19 experiments in which massive, high toxic doses – four times higher than safe of hydroxychloroquine were being given to severely ill hospitalized patients in intensive care units.
Solidarity was being conducted by the World Health Organization, on 3500 Covid-19 patients at 400 hospitals, across 35 countries. The trial was suspended following the fraudulent Surgisphere report in The Lancet that claimed 35% higher death rates in patients receiving Hydroxychloroquine. But when The Lancet retracted the report, the WHO resumed the Solidarity trialMore than 100 countries expressed interest in participating in the trial.
was being conducted by the World Health Organization, on 3500 Covid-19 patients at 400 hospitals, across 35 countries. The trial was suspended following the fraudulent Surgisphere report in The Lancet that claimed 35% higher death rates in patients receiving Hydroxychloroquine. But when The Lancet retracted the report, the WHO resumed the Solidarity trialMore than 100 countries expressed interest in participating in the trial. Recovery experiment used very similar doses. It was sponsored by the Wellcome Trust (GlaxoSmithKline) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the UK government. The experiment was conducted at Oxford University, on 1,542 patients of these 396 patients (25.7%) who were in the high dose Hydroxychloroquine arm, died.
Update: After Dr. Nass’ discovery was publicly disseminated, the WHO suspended the trial on Wednesday June 17th.
On Friday, June 19th, Dr. Nass uncovered a third, “Even Worse” hydroxychloroquine experiment. REMAP targets patients who are on a ventilator, or in shock – i.e., near death. Such patients are hardly capable of giving consent. Rather than attempting to save their lives, they are being used given multiple high doses of hydroxychloroquine and other drugs whose combination is contraindicated.
Of note: All the online protocols have been stamped “Not for IRB (Institutional Review Board) submission,”
This is an ongoing medical atrocity being perpetrated by medical doctors at 200 sites in 14 countries: include: Australia, Belgium, Canada, Croatia, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Netherlands, New Zealand, Portugal, Romania, Spain, United Kingdom, and the United States of America.
Since all medicines are potential poison at high doses, why one wonders, are influential academic physicians and international public health institutions designing and conducting experiments that expose extremely vulnerable patients to poisonous levels of the drug Hydroxychloroquin?
As recognized by the Swiss physician Paracelsus, “the Hippocrates of the Renaissance”:
“What is there that is not poison? All things are poison and nothing is without poison. Solely the dose determines that a thing is not a poison.”
His insight is as relevant today as it was in the 16th century.
Dr. Meryl Nass is a physician practicing individualized medicine in Maine, in accordance with the Hippocratic Oath. She is a longtime member of the board of the Alliance for Human Research Protection.
*******************
What could be worse than giving potentially lethal doses of hydroxychloroquine to Hospitalized Covid-19 patients?
The REMAP-Covid study is using the same HCQ dose as the Recovery trial for 6 days. But it is even worse for the following reasons:
You have to be close to death, either on a ventilator or in shock, on pressor medications, to be included in the trial, according to the trial documents. However, in a talk by Professor Anthony Gordon, HFNO, CPAP and NIV are additionally said to be inclusion criteria. You may receive HCQ alone, or HCQ in combination with 2 more drugs, lopinavir/ritonavir. Yet lopinavir/ritonavir predisposes to QT prolongation, as does HCQ, and the drug label states, “Avoid use in combination with QTc- or PR-interval prolonging drugs.” Patients who are in shock or on a ventilator may be unable to give their consent to enroll in a clinical trial. But the trial investigators have deemed that consent may not be required: “For patients who are not competent to consent, either prospective agreement or entry via waiver of consent or some form of deferred consent can be applied, as required by an appropriate ethical review body.” For patients too sick to swallow a pill, the drug will be administered via a feeding tube. This could entail an extra procedure for patients.
From the Covid protocol page 23:
“Dosing will be hydroxychloroquine administered by the enteral route. A loading dose is important because of the large volume of distribution. The loading dose will be 800 mg, administered 6-hourly, until 2 doses have been administered. Subsequently, starting 12 hours after the first loading dose, the dose will be 400 mg administered 12-hourly for 12 doses. The preferred method of administration is tablets swallowed whole but, if a patient is unable to swallow, crushed tablets dispersed in water can be administered via an enteral tube (a large bore gastric tube is preferred). No dose adjustment is required when hydroxychloroquine is administered via a gastric tube. No dose adjustment is necessary for renal dysfunction or concomitant use of renal replacement therapy. Clinicians should consider a dose adjustment in the presence of liver failure, however no dose adjustment is necessary for abnormal liver function tests in the absence of liver failure.
This is 2400 mg hydroxychloroquine in the first 24 hrs, over 1.86 g of the “base,” then 800 mg/day for 5 more days or until discharge from the ICU, or 6.4 g total. Dosing fails to take into account weight, renal and hepatic function.
The ignorant doctors who justified toxic doses by invoking ‘volume of distribution’ (which is 40,000 liters) failed to notice that the high ‘volume of distribution’ is an artifact related to the drug accumulating in tissue as opposed to plasma. Drug levels in lung are 200-700 times higher than in plasma. Furthermore,
WHO’s consultant Weniger reported in 1979 that a single dose of 1.5-2 g of chloroquine “base” “may be fatal.” A detailed discussion of therapeutic and toxic doses of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine can be found in my article of June 14. I acknowledge that hydroxychloroquine is a bit less toxic than chloroquine. But this trial studies the most fragile human beings, and if the trial investigators were unsure of the right dose, they should have “started low and gone slow” as clinicians are advised to do.
The REMAP study protocol acknowledges that the combination of lopinavir/ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine increases the risk of ventricular arrhythmia, but states that the risk is mitigated because patients this sick will be on cardiac monitors, with QTc monitoring. However, it fails to say that the most likely arrhythmia in this setting is torsade de points, which is very difficult to treat. Patients who are already critically ill are unlikely to survive if it occurs. So why use such an excessive hydroxychloroquine dose on these, or any, patients, and risk it? That is not explained.
The REMAP clinical trial is ongoing in 200 sites in 14 countries. They include: Australia, Belgium, Canada, Croatia, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Netherlands, New Zealand, Portugal, Romania, Spain, United Kingdom, USA.
All their online protocols have been stamped “Not for IRB (Institutional Review Board) submission,” which makes one wonder what was changed when the trial arms were put before IRBs for approval.
Five UK chief medical officers wrote a “Dear Colleague” letter, begging physicians to enroll their Covid patients in clinical trials, including ‘Recovery’ and REMAP, and discouraging “off-label” treatments for Covid outside of trials. Did they know they were asking treating physicians to significantly up the risk of death for their patients? Are they aware that as of today, June 19, the UK has had more deaths from Covid-19 than any country in the world outside the US and Brazil, with 5 and 3 times the UK population, respectively.
Why is public health being turned on its head? This is the third major, multicenter clinical trial of hydroxychloroquine testing toxic doses on Covid patients. The Recovery and Solidarity trials (with almost identical toxic HCQ doses as REMAP) abruptly ended their hydroxychloroquine studies in the past two weeks, coincidentally as people began noticing the excessive doses, especially on Twitter. Who or what is willing to maim and kill patients in order to to kill hydroxychloroquine’s use in Covid-19?
*******************
WHO and UK trials using potentially lethal hydroxychloroquine dose–according to WHO consultant, posted June 14, 2020
The Solidarity Trial is a WHO-led conglomeration of many national trials of treatments for Covid-19. Per the WHO:
As of 3 June 2020, more than 3500 patients have been recruited in 35 countries, with over 400 hospitals actively recruiting patients. Overall, over 100 countries have joined or expressed an interest in joining the trial, and WHO is actively supporting 60 of them…
The hydroxychloroquine arm of the Solidarity trials restarted enrolling patients June 3, after being halted May 25 by WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Ghebreyesus and the Executive Group of the Solidarity Trial. (The hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) arm of the trials was stopped after publication of the Lancet Surgisphere study, which claimed 35% higher death rates in patients who received hydroxychloroquine, but the study was retracted when no one could verify that the Surgisphere database existed).
Below are the drugs being tested in Solidarity:
Remdesivir
Hydroxychloroquine
Lopinavir with Ritonavir
Lopinavir with Ritonavir plus Interferon beta-1a.
However, the doses were not specified on WHO’s list of the drugs to be trialed, nor were the actual doses specified, surprisingly, in WHO’s consultation on chloroquine (CQ) dosing, dated April 8. Instead, the introduction of the report of that meeting notes,
“The chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine schedule selected for the trial includes two oral loading doses (250 mg per tablet CQ or 200 mg per tablet HCQ), then oral twice-daily maintenance doses for ten days. This meeting convened to discuss the appropriateness of the selected doses for the trial.”
Last week, I was alerted to the fact that India’s ICMR, its official medical research agency, had written to the WHO, telling WHO that the hydroxychloroquine doses being used in the Solidarity trial were 4 times higher than the doses being used in India. Then I learned that Singapore has been hesitant to participate in the WHO trial, due to the hydroxychloroquine dose.
The UK “Recovery” trial was one part of the international Solidarity conglomeration of clinical trials. The trial ended its HCQ arm on June 4, reporting no benefit. In-hospital mortality of the 1542 patients receiving hydroxychloroquine was 25.7%, or 396 people.
The Recovery trial Study Protocol notes it is funded in part by the Wellcome Trust and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and by UK government agencies. The Protocol provides the doses of hydroxychloroquine used, on page 22. Twitter users began to notice a dosing issue, with hashtag #Recoverygate.
The quote from the WHO report on dosing, 4 paragraphs ago, seems to be deliberately vague or even misleading, as the actual dose used in the Solidarity and Recovery trials is 12 tablets during the first 24 hours (800mg initial dose, 800 mg six hours later, 400 mg 6 hrs later, 400 mg 6 hours later), then 400 mg every 12 hours for 9 more days. This is 2,400 mg during the first 24 hours, and a cumulative dose of 9.2 grams over 10 days.
While I could not find the WHO HCQ dosing on the WHO website, co-Principal Investigators of the Recovery trial, Drs. Peter Horby and Martin Landray, claimed they followed the WHO dosing. Landray also told the periodical Paris Soir he was using the same hydroxychloroquine dose used for amebiasis. However, the accepted use for HCQ in amebiasis is only for a liver abscess and only then in pregnancy, when other drugs cannot be used. That dose is 600 mg per day for 2 days, then 300 mg per day, less than half the Recovery dose. Professor Horby said that Paris Soir misinterpreted Landray’s comments, but Paris Soir said Landray had confirmed what he told them in an email.
We also know, from an official Belgian guideline document issued June 8, that high doses were used not only by Recovery in the UK, but also by the Discovery trial in the EU and by the WHO.
We also know that in Brazil, both a high dose and a low dose were trialed, and by April 17 the high dose arm was stopped prematurely due to an excess of deaths. The low dose trial continues in Brazil.
How is the drug hydroxychloroquine normally used? For chronic daily use in systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis, patients usually receive between 200 and 400 mg daily. In acute Q fever, 600 mg daily may be given at the start of treatment.
We also know from WHO’s March 13 Informal consultation on the potential role of chloroquine that the Gates Foundation had been studying the drug’s pharmacokinetics, and of the 25 participants at this meeting, 5 were from the Gates Foundation.
The only treatment dose mentioned in their report was in a paragraph about preventive doses. It said,
“Higher doses would be considered for treatment, i.e., 10mg/kg base, followed by 5mg/kg twice daily for seven days.”
What is the “base”? A 200 mg dose of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine contains 155 mg “base” drug.
The typical 70 kg person would, if this suggestion had been followed, receive 700 mg base, or 900 mg of hydroxychloroquine, as a loading dose. Generally, a loading dose refers only to a first dose, not to several additional doses within 24 hours, but it can potentially refer to more.
What is a toxic dose? All experts agree. “… chloroquine has a small toxic to therapeutic margin,” according to Goldfrank’s Toxicologic Emergencies . It is very safe when used correctly in the right patients, but a bit more can potentially kill. Prof. Nicholas White, who attended both WHO consultations on the chloroquines, has mentioned this.
The WHO hired a consultant to explore the toxicity of hydroxychloroquine in 1979. The consultant, H. Weniger, looked at 335 episodes of adult poisoning by chloroquine drugs. Weniger on page 5 notes that a single dose of 1.5-2 grams of hydroxychloroquine base “may be fatal.”
The Recovery trial used 1.860 grams hydroxychloroquine base (equal to 2400 mg of hydroxychloroquine) in the first 24 hours for treatment of already very ill, hospitalized Covid-19 patients, a potentially lethal dose.
The dose used in the Recovery trial is not recommended for therapy of any medical condition, which I confirmed with Goodman and Gilman’s Pharmacology textbook, the drug’s label, and the online medical encyclopedia UptoDate.
This excessive dose apparently continues to be used in WHO Solidarity trials in countries around the world. It appears that the Solidarity trials are not testing the benefits of HCQ on Covid-19, but rather testing whether patients tolerate toxic, nontherapeutic doses.
The WHO Solidarity trials, in order to rapidly enroll patients and spare clinicians a lot of paperwork, collect only limited information on side effects. No information has yet been provided regarding causes of death in the completed hydroxychloroquine arm of the Recovery trial, in which 396 patients died.
The Solidarity trial design being employed by WHO may help obscure whether mortality is due to drug toxicity (in which case, one would expect cause of death to be arrhythmias such as torsade de points, neuropsychiatric effects, or hypoglycemia) versus Covid-19.
The WHO report of its meeting on chloroquine dosing states,
“Although the preponderance of opinion tilted towards a reasonable benefit risk profile for the intervention, there was some scepticism about what was considered a ‘minimalistic safety data collection’ currently included in the protocol.”
The high dose regimen being used in the Solidarity trials has no medical justification. The trial design, with its limited collection of safety data, may make it more difficult to identify toxic drug effects, compared to standard drug trials. This is entirely unethical.
Excessive dosing makes it impossible to assess therapeutic benefit, if any, of HCQ.
Giving the drug only to hospitalized patients means that the window of time during which HCQ would be expected to provide the most benefit, when viral titers are rising, has passed.
To sum up:
HCQ is being given in non-therapeutic, toxic dose HCQ is being given too late in the disease course to determine its value against SAR-CoV-2. Limited safety data in the Solidarity trials serves to protect trial investigators and sponsors from disclosure of adverse drug effects, including death I suspect WHO has been deliberately misleading regarding the doses chosen. The conclusions to be drawn are frightening:
a) WHO and other national health agencies, and charities, have designed huge clinical trials to assure that hydroxychloroquine will fail to show benefit, presumably to advantage its much more expensive competitor(s) and vaccines in development.
b) In so doing, these agencies and charities have conspired to increase the number of deaths in these trials.
c) In so doing, they have conspired to deprive billions of people from potentially benefiting from a safe and inexpensive drug during a major pandemic. This could lead to prolongation of the pandemic and many increased cases and deaths.
My recommendation is for WHO to immediately stop using this dosing schedule, give trial subjects clinically appropriate doses, and collect more complete safety data. I would remind WHO that if the consent forms fail to inform patients that the dose of HCQ they may receive is much higher than for any other indication, that WHO may be subject to legal action for injuries incurred in its sham of a clinical trial.
*******************
Read the full article at AHRP.org
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-06-22--Roundup Cancer Attorney Pleads Guilty to Extortion Attempt

by Carey Gillam U.S .
Right to Know A Virginia lawyer who helped represent the first Roundup cancer plaintiff to take Monsanto to trial pleaded guilty on Friday to trying to extort $ 200 million from a chemical compound supplier to Monsanto .
Timothy Litzenburg , 38 , admitted to a scheme in which he and another lawyer threatened to inflict substantial “ financial and reputational harm ” on the supplier unless that company paid the two attorneys $ 200 million disguised as a “ consulting agreement.
” According to the U.S. Department of Justice , Litzenburg allegedly told the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , he was willing to “ take a dive ” during a deposition , intentionally undermining the prospects for future plaintiffs to try to sue .
Litzenburg was charged with one count each of attempted extortion , conspiracy and transmission of interstate communications with intent to extort .
He pleaded guilty to one count of transmitting interstate communications with the intent to extort .
Lawyer Daniel Kincheloe , 41 , pleaded guilty to the same charge for participating in the scheme .
The men are scheduled to be sentenced on Sept. 18 in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Virginia .
He said that the plea shows that Litzenburg was one of the attorneys for Dewayne “ Lee ” Johnson leading up to Johnson ’ s 2018 trial against Monsanto , which resulted in a $ 289 million jury award in Johnson ’ s favor .
( The judge in the case lowered the verdict and the case is currently under appeal . )
The trial was the first of three that have taken place against Monsanto over allegations that the company ’ s glyphosate-based herbicides such as Roundup cause non-Hodgkin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ owner Bayer AG , have lost all three trials to date but are appealing the verdicts .
Though Litzenburg had helped prepare Johnson for trial , he was not allowed to participate during the actual event because of concerns about his behavior held by The Miller Firm , which was his employer at the time .
The Miller firm subsequently fired Litzenburg and filed a lawsuit in early 2019 alleging Litzenburg engaged in self-dealing , and “ disloyal and erratic conduct.
” Litzenburg responded with a counter-claim .
The parties negotiated a confidential @ @ @ @ @ @ @ did not name the company Litzenburg tried to extort , but said that he contacted the company in September of 2019 year stating that he was preparing a lawsuit that would allege the company supplied chemical compounds used by Monsanto to create Roundup and that the company knew the ingredients were carcinogenic but had failed to warn the public .
According to the federal charges , Litzenburg told a lawyer for the company he was trying to extort that the company should enter into a “ consulting arrangement ” with him so as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would prevent him from filing the threatened litigation .
Litzenburg wrote in the email that the $ 200 million consulting agreement for himself and an associate was “ a very reasonable price , ” according to the criminal complaint .
Federal investigators recorded a phone call with Litzenburg discussing the $ 200 million he was seeking , the complaint states .
Litzenburg was allegedly recorded as saying : “ The way that I guess you guys will think about it and we ’ ve thought about it too is savings for your side @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this gets filed and turns into mass tort , even if you guys win cases and drive value down… I don ’ t think there ’ s any way you get out of it for less than a billion dollars .
And so , you know , to me , uh , this is a fire sale price that you guys should consider… ” Litzenburg claimed to be representing roughly 1,000 clients suing Monsanto over Roundup cancer causation allegations at the time of his arrest last year .

by Carey Gillam
U.S. Right to Know
A Virginia lawyer who helped represent the first Roundup cancer plaintiff to take Monsanto to trial pleaded guilty on Friday to trying to extort $200 million from a chemical compound supplier to Monsanto.
Timothy Litzenburg, 38, admitted to a scheme in which he and another lawyer threatened to inflict substantial “financial and reputational harm” on the supplier unless that company paid the two attorneys $200 million disguised as a “consulting agreement.”
According to the U.S. Department of Justice, Litzenburg allegedly told the company that if they paid the money, he was willing to “take a dive” during a deposition, intentionally undermining the prospects for future plaintiffs to try to sue.
Litzenburg was charged with one count each of attempted extortion, conspiracy and transmission of interstate communications with intent to extort. He pleaded guilty to one count of transmitting interstate communications with the intent to extort.
Lawyer Daniel Kincheloe, 41, pleaded guilty to the same charge for participating in the scheme. The men are scheduled to be sentenced on Sept. 18 in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia.
“This is a case where two attorneys blew well past the line of aggressive advocacy and crossed deep into the territory of illegal extortion, in a brazen attempt to enrich themselves by extracting millions of dollars from a multinational company,” Assistant Attorney General Brian A. Benczkowski said in a statement.
He said that the plea shows that
“when crimes are committed, members of the bar, like all members of the public, will be held accountable for their actions.”
Litzenburg was one of the attorneys for Dewayne “Lee” Johnson leading up to Johnson’s 2018 trial against Monsanto, which resulted in a $289 million jury award in Johnson’s favor. (The judge in the case lowered the verdict and the case is currently under appeal.)
The trial was the first of three that have taken place against Monsanto over allegations that the company’s glyphosate-based herbicides such as Roundup cause non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Monsanto, and its German owner Bayer AG, have lost all three trials to date but are appealing the verdicts.
Though Litzenburg had helped prepare Johnson for trial, he was not allowed to participate during the actual event because of concerns about his behavior held by The Miller Firm, which was his employer at the time.
The Miller firm subsequently fired Litzenburg and filed a lawsuit in early 2019 alleging Litzenburg engaged in self-dealing, and “disloyal and erratic conduct.” Litzenburg responded with a counter-claim. The parties negotiated a confidential settlement.
The criminal complaint against Litzenburg did not name the company Litzenburg tried to extort, but said that he contacted the company in September of 2019 year stating that he was preparing a lawsuit that would allege the company supplied chemical compounds used by Monsanto to create Roundup and that the company knew the ingredients were carcinogenic but had failed to warn the public.
According to the federal charges, Litzenburg told a lawyer for the company he was trying to extort that the company should enter into a “consulting arrangement” with him so as to create a conflict of interest that would prevent him from filing the threatened litigation.
Litzenburg wrote in the email that the $200 million consulting agreement for himself and an associate was “a very reasonable price,” according to the criminal complaint.
Federal investigators recorded a phone call with Litzenburg discussing the $200 million he was seeking, the complaint states. Litzenburg was allegedly recorded as saying:
“The way that I guess you guys will think about it and we’ve thought about it too is savings for your side. I don’t think if this gets filed and turns into mass tort, even if you guys win cases and drive value down… I don’t think there’s any way you get out of it for less than a billion dollars. And so, you know, to me, uh, this is a fire sale price that you guys should consider…”
Litzenburg claimed to be representing roughly 1,000 clients suing Monsanto over Roundup cancer causation allegations at the time of his arrest last year.
Read the full article at USRTK.org.


healthimpactnews--2020-06-22--Will Americans Resist the “Second Wave” Lock Downs? Many New Yorkers Resisting Contact Tracing

The Ron Paul Liberty Report today addressed the issue of the corporate media hyping “ hot spots ” where supposedly cases of Coronavirus are now increasing again .
Former FDA head Scott Gottlieb made the Sunday Talk Show circuit this past weekend , suggesting that the country may need to go into lock down again , which of course would have devastating effects on businesses trying to reopen this summer .
Using publicly available government statistics , Dr. Paul and his co-host Daniel McAdams examined these claims , and concluded that even using their own statistics , it did not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ actually showed any increased danger .
With more widespread testing , more people are being counted as “ positive , ” and yet deaths attributed to COVID continue to decline .
And while their statistics do show a recent spike in hospitalizations earlier this month , it shows they are declining again and that the overall trend is one of decline .
So the important question facing Americans is , will they comply to another lock down based on these fear tactics ?
Or will enough people wake up and stop believing the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and see clearly enough to understand that the lock downs are far more dangerous than the reaction to the Plandemic ?
The future of America may depend upon just how many people choose NOT to comply with the new measures now being planned .
Dr. Paul pointed out a recent article published in the New York Times that shows compliance with contact tracing in New York so far has been very low .
He was hopeful that citizens in other states would also refuse to participate in contact tracing .
New York City @ @ @ @ @ @ @ crucial initiative in the effort to curb the coronavirus , has gotten off to a worrisome start just as the city ’ s reopening enters a new phase on Monday , with outdoor dining , in-store shopping and office work resuming .
The city has hired 3,000 disease detectives and case monitors , who are supposed to identify anyone who has come into contact with the hundreds of people who are still testing positive for the virus in the city every day .
But the first statistics from the program , which began @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are often unable to locate infected people or gather information from them .
Only 35 percent of the 5,347 city residents who tested positive or were presumed positive for the coronavirus in the program ’ s first two weeks gave information about close contacts to tracers , the city said in releasing the first statistics .
The number ticked up slightly , to 42 percent , during the third week , Avery Cohen , a spokeswoman to Mayor Bill de Blasio , said on Sunday .
( Source . )
Having problems receiving @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
The Ron Paul Liberty Report today addressed the issue of the corporate media hyping “hot spots” where supposedly cases of Coronavirus are now increasing again. Former FDA head Scott Gottlieb made the Sunday Talk Show circuit this past weekend, suggesting that the country may need to go into lock down again, which of course would have devastating effects on businesses trying to reopen this summer.
Using publicly available government statistics, Dr. Paul and his co-host Daniel McAdams examined these claims, and concluded that even using their own statistics, it did not appear that these “hot spots” actually showed any increased danger.
With more widespread testing, more people are being counted as “positive,” and yet deaths attributed to COVID continue to decline. And while their statistics do show a recent spike in hospitalizations earlier this month, it shows they are declining again and that the overall trend is one of decline.
So the important question facing Americans is, will they comply to another lock down based on these fear tactics? Or will enough people wake up and stop believing the lies and half truths about the Plandemic and see clearly enough to understand that the lock downs are far more dangerous than the reaction to the Plandemic?
The future of America may depend upon just how many people choose NOT to comply with the new measures now being planned.
Dr. Paul pointed out a recent article published in the New York Times that shows compliance with contact tracing in New York so far has been very low. He was hopeful that citizens in other states would also refuse to participate in contact tracing.
New York City’s ambitious contact-tracing program, a crucial initiative in the effort to curb the coronavirus, has gotten off to a worrisome start just as the city’s reopening enters a new phase on Monday, with outdoor dining, in-store shopping and office work resuming. The city has hired 3,000 disease detectives and case monitors, who are supposed to identify anyone who has come into contact with the hundreds of people who are still testing positive for the virus in the city every day. But the first statistics from the program, which began on June 1, indicate that tracers are often unable to locate infected people or gather information from them. Only 35 percent of the 5,347 city residents who tested positive or were presumed positive for the coronavirus in the program’s first two weeks gave information about close contacts to tracers, the city said in releasing the first statistics. The number ticked up slightly, to 42 percent, during the third week, Avery Cohen, a spokeswoman to Mayor Bill de Blasio, said on Sunday. (Source.)
Coronavirus: ‘Major Spike’…Or Major Propaganda?
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-06-23--Has the Merck Pharmaceutical Company Killed More People than the U.S. Military or Any Terrorist Orga

Has the Merck Pharmaceutical Company Killed More People than the U.S. Military or Any Terrorist Organization?

Which private corporation has likely been responsible for the deaths of more innocent people than any terrorist organization or military regime change in Afghanistan , Iraq , Libya , Syria and elsewhere ?
For us , the answer is evident : Merck and Company .
Iatraogenic medicine , or medical error , is now the third leading cause of death in the US after cardiovascular disease and cancer .
The majority of these deaths are caused by FDA approved drugs ’ adverse effects and from patients taking multiple medications without thorough clinical research to determine the safety of their synergistic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ oversight and monitoring of drugs on the market is dismal .
One of the worst corporate deals the US government may have ever made in modern history was to acquire the American subsidiary of the German pharmaceutical firm Merck and Company during the first world war .
Later in 1953 , Merck acquired a competitive drug maker Sharp and Dohme , thereby establishing itself as America ’ s largest drug developer and manufacturer .
Since then this corporate Medusa has ensnared thirteen other drug firms , including Scherring Plough , which it acquired @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pharmaceutical giants had earned $ 47 billion in combined sales at the time the merger was finalized in 2009 .
Merck ’ s legacy of lawsuits for crimes was observed back in the 1970s .
In 1975 , it was busted by the SEC for illegal payments to foreign government officials from “ approximately ” 36 nations .
The scam was orchestrated through personal bank accounts with the sole purpose of advancing drug approvals through foreign nations ’ regulatory medical agencies .
One of the largest scandals in recent medical history was the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ resulted in fines above $ 4.8 billion for causing over a minimum 60,000 deaths from sudden heart attacks and over 120,000 serious medical injuries .
At its height , Vioxx was earning over $ 2 billion in revenues annually and it is estimated that 25 million patients were prescribed the medication .
The securities class action suit against the company alone reached $ 1 billion , placing it in the top 15 securities lawsuits in US corporate history .
The primary charge was Merck ’ s intentional withholding of scientific data about the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Years after the settlement , Ron Unz , the publisher of The American Conservative , undertook his own investigation to validate Vioxx ’ s death toll .
Analyzing the drug ’ s adverse effects over a longer time period , Unz estimated Merck may have been responsible for nearly half a million premature deaths in elderly patients , the drug ’ s primary target group .
That is roughly the same number of total civilian , military and terrorist deaths from the US ’ military escapades in Afghanistan , Iraq and Pakistan @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 47,000 pending lawsuits for personal injuries and 265 class action cases was a small pittance for the harm Vioxx left in its wake .
Merck executives were never properly punished for willingly concealing the drug ’ s dangers in order to assure FDA approval .
In Australia , Merck ’ s efforts to increase Vioxx profits employed other forms of malfeasance .
The Australian government launched a class action suit against the drug maker on charges that employees allegedly schemed a fake scientific paper that was ghostwritten for a medical journal in order @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Testimonies during the trial stated data was completely based upon “ wishful thinking.
” Merck also founded the peer-reviewed journal Australasian Journal of Bone and Joint Medicine .
The journal was a fraud ; it was not properly peer-reviewed and its primary purpose was to promote Vioxx on the Australian continent .
Moreover , the class action lawsuit contained Merck emails accessed by Australian officials .
The company ’ s internal communications allegedly ordered select employees to draft up a hit list of physicians who were critical of Vioxx .
According to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be “ neutralized ” or “ discredited.
” Some , including Dr. James Fries at Sanford University ’ s medical school , were clinical investigators who happened to speak out about the drug ’ s shortcomings .
One email said , Efforts to target critics for harassment is not limited to Merck .
Earlier , Monsanto earned a similar reputation .
The Monsanto ’ s parent company Bayer had to release a public apology for the discovery of a Monsanto hit list of 200 French journalists and politicians who opposed glyphosate and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ similarly in other countries including the US , according to veteran journalist Carey Gillam .
The list originated from the multinational public relations firm Fleishman Hillard .
Merck has also employed Fleishman Hillard as well as Monsanto ’ s other notorious PR firm Ketchum .
One of Merck ’ s Executive Directors , Ian McConnell , earlier served as a vice president at Fleishman .
The PR firm ’ s senior adviser on healthcare Dr. Lukas Pfister , was at Merck for 25 years in its government affairs unit .
Merck ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ federal health agencies , but also fully infiltrates some of the world ’ s most shadowy international PR firms that specialize in whitewashing the public images of executive elites , corporations and in the case of the PR firm Burson-Marsteller even dictators .
Following the Vioxx case , Merck had hired B-Marsteller to clean up its public image .
MSNBC reported back in 2009 , But Merck ’ s troubles with the dangers of its products , falsified data about drugs ’ efficacy and safety and exaggeration of medical claims go back sixty @ @ @ @ @ @ @ FDA discovered that the drug maker ’ s arthritis medication Indocin had not been properly tested for efficacy and its adverse effects were being completely ignored .
In the 1970s , Merck ’ s drug dietheylstilbestrol ( DES ) prescribed for the prevention of miscarriages caused a flurry of vaginal cancer cases and other gynecological disorders .
Merck had all along known that DES was carcinogenic based upon its own animal clinical trials .
In 2007 , its cholesterol drug Zetia was shown to increase liver disease .
Again Merck had known about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the clinical trial ’ s damning results .
Merck has managed to hijack US courts It would also appear that Merck has managed to hijack US courts as well .
This includes an early 2019 ruling by Trump ’ s corporate-friendly US Supreme Court to side with the drug maker and squash hundreds of lawsuits for failing to issue warnings that its osteoporosis drug Fosamax may contribute to debilitating bone breaks .
A federal court in California found that Merck committed perjury for lying in a patent infringement case against Gilead Sciences over @ @ @ @ @ @ @ drug Sovaldi .
The judge ruled that Merck carried out a It turned out that Merck ’ s patent claims were a sham and orchestrated by its legal division .
Besides pushing through the FDA dangerous medications onto the market , the company has also found itself in the courtroom on many occasions for allegedly price-fixing , routinely defrauding and overbilling states ’ Medicare and Medicaid programs , and violating the Anti-Kickback Statute .
In 2006 , the IRS went after Merck for owing almost $ 2 billion in back taxes .
According @ @ @ @ @ @ @ partnered with a British bank to create an offshore subsidiary in tax-friendly Bermuda to divert taxable revenue on its bestselling cholesterol drugs Zocor and Mevacor through a patent scheme .
The company ran the operation for ten years before the FDA uncovered the racket .
Merck is America ’ s leading vaccine manufacturer .
Despite public perception and the ruse that vaccines are somehow safer and more effective than pharmaceutical drugs in general , it is the same industry and corporate culture that manufactures them .
Currently Merck markets vaccines for Haemophilus B @ @ @ @ @ @ @ individually and in combination ) , human papilomavirus ( Gardasil ) , Measles , Mumps and Rubella ( MMR ) , pneumococcal , rotavirus , varicella ( chickenpox ) and Zoster virus ( for shingles ) .
More recently it has jumped into the coronavirus vaccine race .
In 2010 , Merck obtained exclusive rights to MassBiologics vaccine portfolio .
The consequence is that Merck ’ s Adult Vaccine Portfolio expanded to include 9 of the 10 vaccines on the CDC ’ s adult immunization schedule .
The company now holds almost a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccines .
On its website , the FDA assures the public that However , except for Gardasil , not a single one of Merck ’ s vaccines has ever been tested in a scientifically viable double-blinded placebo controlled trial .
In each case , the placebo in the control group was not inert , such as the use of sterile saline .
Rather Merck only tested the vaccine with the viral component against a faux placebo containing the same ingredients , including aluminum , but minus the virus .
Known as a “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ protocol does not designate it as a proper placebo for measuring the efficacy and disease risks of a drug .
And in the case of Gardasil , the trial was statistical trickery to mask Gardasil ’ s adverse effects .
Therefore the FDA ’ s claim is patently false .
None of Merck ’ s vaccines have ever undergone a “ rigorous review ” prior to regulatory approval .
Although not completely innocent from internal unfairness and conflicts of interest , the Cochrane Database Collaboration arguably remains the most reliable resource for analysis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the evidence-based medical establishment .
In its 2016 analysis of Merck ’ s human papillomavirus vaccine Gardasil , the investigators were so alarmed they filed a complaint against the European Medical Agency for failing to adequately assess the vaccine ’ s neurological harms .
As we have recently witnessed with Monsanto ’ s Roundup and Bayer ’ s settlement of $ 10 billion to cover 80,000 lawsuits , Gardasil may very well become the company ’ s Achilles heel .
The Gardasil scandal may very well begin to topple the vaccine regime @ @ @ @ @ @ @ increasing awareness and distrust in the official mantra that vaccines are safe and effective .
The development , scientific rationale , fraudulent clinical trials and data reporting , and inside negotiations with federal health officials to market the vaccine to pre-teen and teen girls and boys , is a story riddled with misconduct .
Today it is Merck ’ s third largest revenue-generating drug after its cancer drug Keytruda and diabetes drug Januvia , earning $ 3.1 billion in 2018 .
Its MMR vaccine is fifth having earned $ 1.8 billion .
Gardasil @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the prevention of an urgent national health need .
Instead it was more likely a business strategy through Merck ’ s influence over our nation ’ s regulatory agencies and state politicians whose election campaigns it funds .
In 2018 , a French oncologist , Dr. Gerard Delepine , stumbled upon a correlation between the increase of cervical cancer rates with the rising rates of Gardasil vaccinations .
Delepine also compared France , which was deliberating on whether to mandate HPV vaccination , with other countries that relied upon pap smears as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ He observed that in all countries that prioritized pap smears , cervical cancer rates were decreasing ; whereas , in those countries with higher HPV vaccination compliance , the rates increased .
In his letter to the French government in defiance of Merck ’ s lobbying efforts , Delephine stated : An article published in the French journal Agoravox noted that other national health ministries are coming around to acknowledge that Gardasil is an extremely unsafe vaccine .
Japan , Austria and Denmark no longer promote it due to is trail of injuries @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Merck ’ s Gardasil have occurred in Japan , Colombia , and Ireland .
Yet none of these efforts to warn the public about Gardasil ’ s risks have reached the American media .
Hopefully this may change .
Medical researchers at the University of South Alabama presented their paper at the Society of Gynecologic Oncology ’ s annual conference .
There is great disparity between HPV vaccine compliance across Alabama counties , which range anywhere between 33 and 66 percent .
Yet the epidemiological data suggests there is no evidence that Gardasil @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine uptake .
Moreover , there is zero chance of pre-teens and teens getting cervical cancer .
The average age for the onset of the cancer is 50 years .
Nor has the vaccine been on the market long enough to determine whether it protects a woman when she reaches even close to that age .
Its product insert for physicians states the vaccine Consequently , there is no scientific rationale for states to mandate the HPV vaccine for schoolchildren let alone even vaccinating them in the first place .
In addition , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine under a false pretext that HPV infection is the leading cause of cervical cancer ; correctly , only a third of cervical cancer cases are caused by the virus .
Robert Kennedy Jr is currently taking steps to sue Merck over the Gardasil deception .
Merck ’ s first effort to have the class action suit dismissed was overturned by the court .
Kennedy ’ s in-depth investigations through his Children ’ s Health Defense organization have uncovered evidence that the vaccine increases birth defects in children conceived of HPV-vaccinated moms , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and girls are experiencing serious reproductive complications , including infertility , at approximately ten-fold above the normal rate .
During an interview on the Progressive Radio Network , he noted that there was 10 times greater risk of dying from cervical cancer among Gardasil trial participants compared to the general public .
There is a 10-fold increase for ovarian failure , and 1 in 37 girls who receive the vaccine will experience an autoimmune disease after 6 months of receiving the series of injections .
When we consider that 1 in 37,000 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cervical cancer , it puts HPV vaccines into a completely different light .
Sadly , across the nation , politicians from both sides of the aisle in state legislatures , notably Governor Andrew Cuomo in New York , are seemingly doing Merck ’ s bidding to mandate Gardasil for all girls and boys upon entering school .
Based upon Kennedy ’ s research and documents received from Freedom of Information Act filings , during Merck ’ s own Gardasil clinical trials , 2.3 percent of girls and women between the ages of 9 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and crippling neurological disorders within seven months of vaccination .
Among the 10,700 who received the actual vaccine , 245 ( 2.3 % ) had an autoimmune disorder ; among the 9,412 who received either an “ AAHS Control ” — the aluminum hydrophosphate sulfate adjuvant solution with other ingredients minus the HPV virus vectors , there were 218 ( 2.3 % ) life-threatening injuries .
The most frequent adverse effects were arthritis and anthropathy , autoimmune thyroiditis , celiac disease , hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism , inflammatory bowel disease , psoriasis , Raynaud @ @ @ @ @ @ @ uveitis .
In other words , it was the aluminum adjuvant responsible for this enormous suffering .
He stated during the Progressive Radio Network broadcast that according to Merck ’ s own statistics , girls are one hundred times more likely to experience a serious adverse effect from the vaccine than to be protected from cervical cancer .
In a 2012 article published in the Journal of Law and Medical Ethics , researchers at the University of British Columbia wrote that ever since Gardasil was approved in 2006 , Merck has engaged in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ take advantage of FDA loopholes to fast track its drugs .
In the case of its expanded Gardasil-9 for adults between the ages of 27 to 45 , the company applied for fast tracking two days after the Journal of Toxicological and Environmental Health published a study that the HPV vaccine was lowering the probability of pregnancy for women in their 20s .
Unfortunately , the media has indiscriminately colluded with Merck .
Drug companies , according to Kennedy , pay $ 4.5 billion to the major media networks and publications to promote @ @ @ @ @ @ @ media outlets are willing to sacrifice their profits for advertising drugs on moral and ethical grounds .
Another scandal erupted within Merck ’ s vaccine business in 2010 after two whistleblowers gave testimony that the mumps component in its Measles-Mumps-Rubella ( MMR ) vaccine was based on fraudulent data about it ’ s efficacy , and the company knowingly proceeded in order to corner the mumps vaccine market .
Merck had been defrauding the US government , which purchases the MMR , for a decade .
The government and the two Merck whistleblowers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , filed a lawsuit against Merck for being in violation of the False Claims Act .
According to the charges , Merck had “ falsified its mumps vaccine test results to hit an efficacy rate of 95 percent.
” The company achieved this by adding “ animal antibodies to a blood sample to give the impression of increased antibodies.
” This would certainly explain why mumps outbreaks in summer camps and on college campuses are found to occur among those vaccinated .
Merck has gained enormous political and social influence over the national @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Merck ’ s behind the scenes aggression against the flim Vaxxed .
When the documentary film was officially selected to screen during the 2016 Tribeca Film Festival in Manhattan , we discovered in an earlier report that Merck left its fingerprints on the film ’ s removal and censorship .
The Alfred Sloan Foundation is the festival ’ s largest sponsor ; pro-vaccine advocate Bill Gates is also a notable contributor .
One of the leading persons on the Foundation ’ s board of trustees was Dr. Peter Kim .
Kim happens to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s Research Laboratories who was directly responsible for the launch of Gardasil and Merck ’ s other vaccines for the Zoster virus and rotavirus .
The film presents a harsh indictment against Dr Julie Gerberding , the former head of the CDC who allegedly coordinated the cover up of data that confirmed thimerosal ’ s role in the onset of autism .
After managing the agency ’ s operations to mine sweep the data and generate new studies with public funds to suggest thimerosal ’ s safety , Gerberding accepted her reward from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of Merck ’ s vaccine division .
In addition , according to the whistleblowing of a senior CDC scientist , Dr. William Thompson , Gerberding was allegedly responsible for destroying the CDC ’ s research that showed African American boys were at a substantially higher risk of becoming autistic from Merck ’ s MMR vaccine .
Fortunately , Dr. Thompson , who was present during the order to shred documents , saved copies which he subsequently turned over to Congressman Bill Posy and an independent biologist Prof. Brian Hooker .
Since then , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Merck ’ s culture of greed , deception , political maneuvering and aggression has collectively injured countless people All told , these examples of Merck ’ s culture of greed , deception , political maneuvering and aggression has collectively injured countless people .
Merck is a global corporation .
Its products , like Monsanto ’ s glyphosate , are marketed globally .
To better understand Merck , the company should be perceived foremost as a cash cow for Wall Street .
Its prime directive is selling drugs ; its history of misdemeanors and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ integrity in its commitment to prevent and treat disease .
The full extent of the casualties from Merck ’ s drugs and vaccines may never be properly calculated .
For firms such as Merck and Monsanto , injuries and deaths are the necessary collateral damage of getting poorly tested products on the market and as fast as possible .
A black box should be slapped on the Merck logo .
What is important at this moment is that many corporations are fast-tracking a Covid-19 vaccine , without sufficient long-term animal and human clinical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ making efforts to beat out its competition with a Covid-19 vaccine .
Do we really want to trust such a company with this reputation with a Covid vaccine ?
Therefore we recommend people to support the efforts of Bobby Kennedy and the Children ’ s Health Defense in its lawsuit against Merck ’ s Gardasil .
A victory may well weaken the entire edifice of vaccine pseudoscience and the public will realize that for decades it has been little more than a house of cards .
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Progressive Radio Network and a former Senior Research Analyst in the biotechnology and genomic industries .
Dr. Gary Null is the host of America ’ s longest running public radio program on alternative and nutritional health and a multi-award-winning documentary film director , including War on Health and more recently Last Call for Tomorrow .
14-Year-Old Active Girl in Wisconsin Suffers Over 300 Seizures After Gardasil Vaccine – Doctor Refuses to Consider Gardasil Cause due to Fear of Losing Research Funding Illinois Teen Dies Three Weeks After Being Injected with HPV Gardasil @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Own Daughter who Develops Leukemia and Dies Infant Accidentally Vaccinated with Gardasil – Mother Blamed for Vaccine Injuries and Baby Medically Kidnapped The Happy-go-Lucky Girl I had Pre-HPV Vaccine is Gone Forever Gardasil Vaccine Given without Consent and Ruins Life of 14 Year Old Girl After 3 Years of Suffering 19 Year Old Girl Dies from Gardasil Vaccine Injuries Gardasil : The Decision We Will Always Regret 15 Year Old French Girl ’ s “ Descent into Hell ” After Gardasil Vaccine – Wheelchair Bound and Paralyzed The Gardasil Vaccine After-Life : My @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Self Gardasil : An Experience no Child Should Have to Go Through I Want my Daughter ’ s Life Back the Way it was Before Gardasil 15-Year-Old Vaccinated by Force with Gardasil now Suffers from Paralysis and Pain Gardasil : We Thought It Was The Right Choice “ HPV Vaccine Has Done This to My Child ” 13 Year Old World Championship Karate Student Forced to Quit After Gardasil Vaccine If I Could Turn Back Time , Korey Would not Have Received any Gardasil Shots What Doctors Don ’ t Tell You : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Government over Compensation for Gardasil Vaccine Injuries Gardasil : When Will our Nightmare End ?
HPV Vaccine Injuries : “ I Can not Begin to Describe What it is Like to Watch your Daughter Live in Such Agony ” Gardasil : Don ’ t Let Your Child Become “ One Less ” The Gardasil Vaccine Changed Our Definition of “ Normal ” Gardasil : I Should Have Researched First “ They ’ ve Been Robbed of Their Womanhood ” – Local Milwaukee Media Covers Gardasil Vaccine Injuries Gardasil : The Decision I will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Want my Healthy Daughter Back Gardasil : My Family Suffers with Me Gardasil Changed my Health , my Life , and Family ’ s Lives Forever My Personal Battle After the Gardasil Vaccine Gardasil : The Worst Thing That Ever Happened to Me The Dark Side of Gardasil – A Nightmare that Became Real We have published hundreds of stories about Gardasil over the past few years , and not just personal stories of the vaccine ’ s effects , but also articles uncovering the corruption that allowed this vaccine to come to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all outside the U.S. , showing how dangerous this vaccine really is .
Many countries , like Japan , do not recommend this vaccine any longer .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist ( kidney doctor ) , Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people .
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real , ethical medicine .
One @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines , no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public .
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children , and even adults .
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact , part of the Health Impact News network .

Merck’s History of Crimes and Misdemeanors
by Richard Gale and Gary Null
Progressive Radio Network
Which private corporation has likely been responsible for the deaths of more innocent people than any terrorist organization or military regime change in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria and elsewhere?
For us, the answer is evident: Merck and Company.
Iatraogenic medicine, or medical error, is now the third leading cause of death in the US after cardiovascular disease and cancer. The majority of these deaths are caused by FDA approved drugs’ adverse effects and from patients taking multiple medications without thorough clinical research to determine the safety of their synergistic effects.
Consequently our health agencies’ oversight and monitoring of drugs on the market is dismal.
One of the worst corporate deals the US government may have ever made in modern history was to acquire the American subsidiary of the German pharmaceutical firm Merck and Company during the first world war. Later in 1953, Merck acquired a competitive drug maker Sharp and Dohme, thereby establishing itself as America’s largest drug developer and manufacturer.
Since then this corporate Medusa has ensnared thirteen other drug firms, including Scherring Plough, which it acquired for $41 billion. The two pharmaceutical giants had earned $47 billion in combined sales at the time the merger was finalized in 2009.
Merck’s legacy of lawsuits for crimes
Merck’s legacy of lawsuits for crimes was observed back in the 1970s.
In 1975, it was busted by the SEC for illegal payments to foreign government officials from “approximately” 36 nations. The scam was orchestrated through personal bank accounts with the sole purpose of advancing drug approvals through foreign nations’ regulatory medical agencies.
One of the largest scandals in recent medical history was the company’s anti-inflammatory drug Vioxx that resulted in fines above $4.8 billion for causing over a minimum 60,000 deaths from sudden heart attacks and over 120,000 serious medical injuries.
At its height, Vioxx was earning over $2 billion in revenues annually and it is estimated that 25 million patients were prescribed the medication. The securities class action suit against the company alone reached $1 billion, placing it in the top 15 securities lawsuits in US corporate history. The primary charge was Merck’s intentional withholding of scientific data about the drug’s adverse cardiovascular side effects.
Years after the settlement, Ron Unz, the publisher of The American Conservative, undertook his own investigation to validate Vioxx’s death toll. Analyzing the drug’s adverse effects over a longer time period, Unz estimated Merck may have been responsible for nearly half a million premature deaths in elderly patients, the drug’s primary target group.
That is roughly the same number of total civilian, military and terrorist deaths from the US’ military escapades in Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan combined.
Merck’s settlement of 47,000 pending lawsuits for personal injuries and 265 class action cases was a small pittance for the harm Vioxx left in its wake. Merck executives were never properly punished for willingly concealing the drug’s dangers in order to assure FDA approval.
In Australia, Merck’s efforts to increase Vioxx profits employed other forms of malfeasance. The Australian government launched a class action suit against the drug maker on charges that employees allegedly schemed a fake scientific paper that was ghostwritten for a medical journal in order to put Vioxx into a positive light.
Testimonies during the trial stated data was completely based upon “wishful thinking.” Merck also founded the peer-reviewed journal Australasian Journal of Bone and Joint Medicine. The journal was a fraud; it was not properly peer-reviewed and its primary purpose was to promote Vioxx on the Australian continent.
Moreover, the class action lawsuit contained Merck emails accessed by Australian officials. The company’s internal communications allegedly ordered select employees to draft up a hit list of physicians who were critical of Vioxx.
According to the documents, these physicians were targeted to be “neutralized” or “discredited.” Some, including Dr. James Fries at Sanford University’s medical school, were clinical investigators who happened to speak out about the drug’s shortcomings. One email said,
“We may need to seek them out and destroy them where they live…”
Efforts to target critics for harassment is not limited to Merck. Earlier, Monsanto earned a similar reputation. The Monsanto’s parent company Bayer had to release a public apology for the discovery of a Monsanto hit list of 200 French journalists and politicians who opposed glyphosate and its GMO crops. It has acted similarly in other countries including the US, according to veteran journalist Carey Gillam. The list originated from the multinational public relations firm Fleishman Hillard.
Merck has also employed Fleishman Hillard as well as Monsanto’s other notorious PR firm Ketchum. One of Merck’s Executive Directors, Ian McConnell, earlier served as a vice president at Fleishman.
The PR firm’s senior adviser on healthcare Dr. Lukas Pfister, was at Merck for 25 years in its government affairs unit. Merck’s revolving door is not limited to our federal health agencies, but also fully infiltrates some of the world’s most shadowy international PR firms that specialize in whitewashing the public images of executive elites, corporations and in the case of the PR firm Burson-Marsteller even dictators.
Following the Vioxx case, Merck had hired B-Marsteller to clean up its public image. MSNBC reported back in 2009,
“When evil needs public relations, evil has Burson-Marsteller on speed dial.”
But Merck’s troubles with the dangers of its products, falsified data about drugs’ efficacy and safety and exaggeration of medical claims go back sixty years.
In the 1960s, the FDA discovered that the drug maker’s arthritis medication Indocin had not been properly tested for efficacy and its adverse effects were being completely ignored.
In the 1970s, Merck’s drug dietheylstilbestrol (DES) prescribed for the prevention of miscarriages caused a flurry of vaginal cancer cases and other gynecological disorders. Merck had all along known that DES was carcinogenic based upon its own animal clinical trials.
In 2007, its cholesterol drug Zetia was shown to increase liver disease. Again Merck had known about Zetia’s liver risks but withheld the clinical trial’s damning results.
Merck has managed to hijack US courts
It would also appear that Merck has managed to hijack US courts as well. This includes an early 2019 ruling by Trump’s corporate-friendly US Supreme Court to side with the drug maker and squash hundreds of lawsuits for failing to issue warnings that its osteoporosis drug Fosamax may contribute to debilitating bone breaks.
A federal court in California found that Merck committed perjury for lying in a patent infringement case against Gilead Sciences over the latter’s blockbuster Hepatitis C drug Sovaldi. The judge ruled that Merck carried out a
“systematic and outrageous deception in conjunction with unethical business practices and litigation misconduct.”
It turned out that Merck’s patent claims were a sham and orchestrated by its legal division.
Besides pushing through the FDA dangerous medications onto the market, the company has also found itself in the courtroom on many occasions for allegedly price-fixing, routinely defrauding and overbilling states’ Medicare and Medicaid programs, and violating the Anti-Kickback Statute.
In 2006, the IRS went after Merck for owing almost $2 billion in back taxes. According to the Wall Street Journal, Merck partnered with a British bank to create an offshore subsidiary in tax-friendly Bermuda to divert taxable revenue on its bestselling cholesterol drugs Zocor and Mevacor through a patent scheme.
The company ran the operation for ten years before the FDA uncovered the racket.
Merck is America’s leading vaccine manufacturer
Merck is America’s leading vaccine manufacturer. Despite public perception and the ruse that vaccines are somehow safer and more effective than pharmaceutical drugs in general, it is the same industry and corporate culture that manufactures them.
Currently Merck markets vaccines for Haemophilus B, Hepatitis A and Hepatitis B (individually and in combination), human papilomavirus (Gardasil), Measles, Mumps and Rubella (MMR), pneumococcal, rotavirus, varicella (chickenpox) and Zoster virus (for shingles).
More recently it has jumped into the coronavirus vaccine race. In 2010, Merck obtained exclusive rights to MassBiologics vaccine portfolio. The consequence is that Merck’s Adult Vaccine Portfolio expanded to include 9 of the 10 vaccines on the CDC’s adult immunization schedule. The company now holds almost a full monopoly on the government’s vaccines.
On its website, the FDA assures the public that
“Vaccines, as with all products regulated by the FDA, undergo a rigorous review of laboratory and clinical data to ensure the safety, efficacy, purity and potency of these products.”
However, except for Gardasil, not a single one of Merck’s vaccines has ever been tested in a scientifically viable double-blinded placebo controlled trial. In each case, the placebo in the control group was not inert, such as the use of sterile saline.
Rather Merck only tested the vaccine with the viral component against a faux placebo containing the same ingredients, including aluminum, but minus the virus. Known as a “carrier solution,” the standard scientific protocol does not designate it as a proper placebo for measuring the efficacy and disease risks of a drug.
The Gardasil Scandal
And in the case of Gardasil, the trial was statistical trickery to mask Gardasil’s adverse effects. Therefore the FDA’s claim is patently false. None of Merck’s vaccines have ever undergone a “rigorous review” prior to regulatory approval.
Although not completely innocent from internal unfairness and conflicts of interest, the Cochrane Database Collaboration arguably remains the most reliable resource for analysis of drugs, vaccines and medical devices in the evidence-based medical establishment.
In its 2016 analysis of Merck’s human papillomavirus vaccine Gardasil, the investigators were so alarmed they filed a complaint against the European Medical Agency for failing to adequately assess the vaccine’s neurological harms.
As we have recently witnessed with Monsanto’s Roundup and Bayer’s settlement of $10 billion to cover 80,000 lawsuits, Gardasil may very well become the company’s Achilles heel.
The Gardasil scandal may very well begin to topple the vaccine regime and raise the public’s already increasing awareness and distrust in the official mantra that vaccines are safe and effective.
The development, scientific rationale, fraudulent clinical trials and data reporting, and inside negotiations with federal health officials to market the vaccine to pre-teen and teen girls and boys, is a story riddled with misconduct.
Today it is Merck’s third largest revenue-generating drug after its cancer drug Keytruda and diabetes drug Januvia, earning $3.1 billion in 2018.
Its MMR vaccine is fifth having earned $1.8 billion.
Gardasil’s success has nothing to do with the prevention of an urgent national health need. Instead it was more likely a business strategy through Merck’s influence over our nation’s regulatory agencies and state politicians whose election campaigns it funds.
In 2018, a French oncologist, Dr. Gerard Delepine, stumbled upon a correlation between the increase of cervical cancer rates with the rising rates of Gardasil vaccinations. Delepine also compared France, which was deliberating on whether to mandate HPV vaccination, with other countries that relied upon pap smears as a preventative measure against cervical cancer.
He observed that in all countries that prioritized pap smears, cervical cancer rates were decreasing; whereas, in those countries with higher HPV vaccination compliance, the rates increased.
In his letter to the French government in defiance of Merck’s lobbying efforts, Delephine stated:
“A compulsory health measure should not be based on faith in vaccination or hidden conflicts of interest, but on proven facts, verifiable by every citizen. However, the facts established by the official records of cancer registries show that HPV vaccination does not protect against invasive cancer of the cervix, but seems rather to maintain its frequency at a high level and sometimes even increase it.”
An article published in the French journal Agoravox noted that other national health ministries are coming around to acknowledge that Gardasil is an extremely unsafe vaccine.
Japan, Austria and Denmark no longer promote it due to is trail of injuries with fatal consequences. Public demonstrations against Merck’s Gardasil have occurred in Japan, Colombia, and Ireland.
Yet none of these efforts to warn the public about Gardasil’s risks have reached the American media. Hopefully this may change.
Medical researchers at the University of South Alabama presented their paper at the Society of Gynecologic Oncology’s annual conference. There is great disparity between HPV vaccine compliance across Alabama counties, which range anywhere between 33 and 66 percent.
Yet the epidemiological data suggests there is no evidence that Gardasil lowered cancer rates in counties with higher vaccine uptake. Moreover, there is zero chance of pre-teens and teens getting cervical cancer. The average age for the onset of the cancer is 50 years. Nor has the vaccine been on the market long enough to determine whether it protects a woman when she reaches even close to that age.
Its product insert for physicians states the vaccine
“may not result in protection in all vaccine recipients”
and it
“has not been demonstrated to prevent HPV-related CIN 2/3 [abnormal pre-cancerous cervical cells] or worse in women older than 26 years of age.”
Consequently, there is no scientific rationale for states to mandate the HPV vaccine for schoolchildren let alone even vaccinating them in the first place.
In addition, the federal agencies and Merck market the vaccine under a false pretext that HPV infection is the leading cause of cervical cancer; correctly, only a third of cervical cancer cases are caused by the virus.
Robert Kennedy Jr is currently taking steps to sue Merck over the Gardasil deception. Merck’s first effort to have the class action suit dismissed was overturned by the court.
Kennedy’s in-depth investigations through his Children’s Health Defense organization have uncovered evidence that the vaccine increases birth defects in children conceived of HPV-vaccinated moms, miscarriages have increased 2000 percent above normal, and girls are experiencing serious reproductive complications, including infertility, at approximately ten-fold above the normal rate.
During an interview on the Progressive Radio Network, he noted that there was 10 times greater risk of dying from cervical cancer among Gardasil trial participants compared to the general public.
There is a 10-fold increase for ovarian failure, and 1 in 37 girls who receive the vaccine will experience an autoimmune disease after 6 months of receiving the series of injections.
When we consider that 1 in 37,000 women have a chance of dying from cervical cancer, it puts HPV vaccines into a completely different light.
Sadly, across the nation, politicians from both sides of the aisle in state legislatures, notably Governor Andrew Cuomo in New York, are seemingly doing Merck’s bidding to mandate Gardasil for all girls and boys upon entering school.
Based upon Kennedy’s research and documents received from Freedom of Information Act filings, during Merck’s own Gardasil clinical trials, 2.3 percent of girls and women between the ages of 9 through 26 developed a serious autoimmune disease and crippling neurological disorders within seven months of vaccination.
Among the 10,700 who received the actual vaccine, 245 (2.3%) had an autoimmune disorder; among the 9,412 who received either an “AAHS Control” — the aluminum hydrophosphate sulfate adjuvant solution with other ingredients minus the HPV virus vectors, there were 218 (2.3%) life-threatening injuries.
The most frequent adverse effects were arthritis and anthropathy, autoimmune thyroiditis, celiac disease, hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism, inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis, Raynaud’s Phenomenon, rheumatoid arthritis and uveitis.
In other words, it was the aluminum adjuvant responsible for this enormous suffering. He stated during the Progressive Radio Network broadcast that according to Merck’s own statistics, girls are one hundred times more likely to experience a serious adverse effect from the vaccine than to be protected from cervical cancer.
In a 2012 article published in the Journal of Law and Medical Ethics, researchers at the University of British Columbia wrote that ever since Gardasil was approved in 2006, Merck has engaged in
“overly aggressive marketing strategies and lobbying campaigns aimed at promoting Gardasil as a mandatory vaccine.”
One strategy Merck has employed is to take advantage of FDA loopholes to fast track its drugs. In the case of its expanded Gardasil-9 for adults between the ages of 27 to 45, the company applied for fast tracking two days after the Journal of Toxicological and Environmental Health published a study that the HPV vaccine was lowering the probability of pregnancy for women in their 20s.
Unfortunately, the media has indiscriminately colluded with Merck. Drug companies, according to Kennedy, pay $4.5 billion to the major media networks and publications to promote their drugs. And none of the media outlets are willing to sacrifice their profits for advertising drugs on moral and ethical grounds.
Mumps Vaccine Fraud: Whistleblowers Sue
Another scandal erupted within Merck’s vaccine business in 2010 after two whistleblowers gave testimony that the mumps component in its Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) vaccine was based on fraudulent data about it’s efficacy, and the company knowingly proceeded in order to corner the mumps vaccine market.
Merck had been defrauding the US government, which purchases the MMR, for a decade.
The government and the two Merck whistleblowers, virologists Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski, filed a lawsuit against Merck for being in violation of the False Claims Act.
According to the charges, Merck had “falsified its mumps vaccine test results to hit an efficacy rate of 95 percent.” The company achieved this by adding “animal antibodies to a blood sample to give the impression of increased antibodies.” This would certainly explain why mumps outbreaks in summer camps and on college campuses are found to occur among those vaccinated.
Merck has gained enormous political and social influence over the national perception about vaccines.
One example is Merck’s behind the scenes aggression against the flim Vaxxed. When the documentary film was officially selected to screen during the 2016 Tribeca Film Festival in Manhattan, we discovered in an earlier report that Merck left its fingerprints on the film’s removal and censorship.
The Alfred Sloan Foundation is the festival’s largest sponsor; pro-vaccine advocate Bill Gates is also a notable contributor.
One of the leading persons on the Foundation’s board of trustees was Dr. Peter Kim. Kim happens to be the former president of Merck’s Research Laboratories who was directly responsible for the launch of Gardasil and Merck’s other vaccines for the Zoster virus and rotavirus.
The film presents a harsh indictment against Dr Julie Gerberding, the former head of the CDC who allegedly coordinated the cover up of data that confirmed thimerosal’s role in the onset of autism. After managing the agency’s operations to mine sweep the data and generate new studies with public funds to suggest thimerosal’s safety, Gerberding accepted her reward from the pharmaceutical industry by becoming the head of Merck’s vaccine division.
In addition, according to the whistleblowing of a senior CDC scientist, Dr. William Thompson, Gerberding was allegedly responsible for destroying the CDC’s research that showed African American boys were at a substantially higher risk of becoming autistic from Merck’s MMR vaccine.
Fortunately, Dr. Thompson, who was present during the order to shred documents, saved copies which he subsequently turned over to Congressman Bill Posy and an independent biologist Prof. Brian Hooker. Since then, Congress has failed to hold hearings.
Merck’s culture of greed, deception, political maneuvering and aggression has collectively injured countless people
All told, these examples of Merck’s culture of greed, deception, political maneuvering and aggression has collectively injured countless people.
Merck is a global corporation. Its products, like Monsanto’s glyphosate, are marketed globally.
To better understand Merck, the company should be perceived foremost as a cash cow for Wall Street. Its prime directive is selling drugs; its history of misdemeanors and crimes should indicate the company holds little integrity in its commitment to prevent and treat disease.
The full extent of the casualties from Merck’s drugs and vaccines may never be properly calculated. For firms such as Merck and Monsanto, injuries and deaths are the necessary collateral damage of getting poorly tested products on the market and as fast as possible.
A black box should be slapped on the Merck logo.
What is important at this moment is that many corporations are fast-tracking a Covid-19 vaccine, without sufficient long-term animal and human clinical trials, and Merck is now aggressively making efforts to beat out its competition with a Covid-19 vaccine.
Do we really want to trust such a company with this reputation with a Covid vaccine? Therefore we recommend people to support the efforts of Bobby Kennedy and the Children’s Health Defense in its lawsuit against Merck’s Gardasil. A victory may well weaken the entire edifice of vaccine pseudoscience and the public will realize that for decades it has been little more than a house of cards.
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.
About the Authors
Richard Gale is the Executive Producer of the Progressive Radio Network and a former Senior Research Analyst in the biotechnology and genomic industries.
Dr. Gary Null is the host of America’s longest running public radio program on alternative and nutritional health and a multi-award-winning documentary film director, including War on Health and more recently Last Call for Tomorrow.
We have published hundreds of stories about Gardasil over the past few years, and not just personal stories of the vaccine’s effects, but also articles uncovering the corruption that allowed this vaccine to come to market, and published scientific studies, all outside the U.S., showing how dangerous this vaccine really is. Many countries, like Japan, do not recommend this vaccine any longer.
See Also:
Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Book – The Vaccine Court “The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program” ORDER HERE!
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
Order here!
Make a Statement for Health Freedom!
Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children, and even adults.
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact, part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!