healthimpactnews--2020-06-05--The Myth of Right vs. Left, Liberal vs. Conservative – Top 9 Myths Believed by BOTH Sides to Usher i

The Myth of Right vs. Left, Liberal vs. Conservative – Top 9 Myths Believed by BOTH Sides to Usher in a New World Order

I have previously written about how the events unfolding very rapidly before us today are not accidental events , but planned events with a very specific goal , a New World Order .
See : The UN “ New World Order ” Has Now Been Published : No Longer a “ Conspiracy Theory ” – Out of the Shadows The New World Order is being planned by very rich and very influential people who have been planning this for a long time .
They want to reduce the world ’ s population and establish a single government to rule the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ system .
I have unmasked who is at the top of this group as well , and if you have not read that article which was published earlier this week ( June 2020 ) , please read that first to understand the context from which this article is based .
Unmasking Who is Behind the Plandemic and Rioting to Usher in the New World Order These global leaders , known as the Illuminati , control the world ’ s monetary system , and they fund the wars of the world as well , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ primary way that they transfer the wealth of the common people to the richest 1 % of the world .
While the history of these forces can be traced really all the way back to the beginning of the human race , the modern struggles that have caused wars started in Europe in the 1700s which funded the revolutions of most European kingdoms , and ushered in World War I , followed by World War II which started the beginning of the Industrial Age .
Since World War II there have been many @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rich central bankers , but war has also been redefined several times in more recent history with the “ Cold War ” relations between the U.S. and the old Soviet Union which allowed massive spending on defense systems , the “ War on Terror ” after 911 , and most recently this year , 2020 , the War Against the Unseen Enemy : The Coronavirus .
This last war , the war against the Coronavirus , might be the largest and quickest transfer of wealth from the common people to the Globalists that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of people are out work , and thousands of businesses are closed , while BILLIONS are just handed over to Big Pharma to “ save us ” from this unseen enemy .
To make money from these wars , the Globalists who control the world ’ s monetary supply need conflict ( something to stand for and fight against ) , and a large military to manage the wars .
As I discussed in the article “ Unmasking Who is Behind the Plandemic and Rioting to Usher in the New World Order , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ today ’ s political divide of “ Left vs.
Right ” was written and put into action by the secret society known as the Illuminati back in the 1700s .
This is best documented in the book , Pawns in the Game , by William Guy Carr and published in the 1950s , which I discuss in detail in the “ Unmasking ” article .
While there are obviously real differences between the two parties , both sides end up with the same result : A New World Order run by the Illuminati @ @ @ @ @ @ @ central banks .
Historically they have funded both sides of the major world wars , because wars allow them to transfer wealth , and also to reduce the world ’ s population .
Most people holding to one side or the other in this political debate don ’ t even know that the end result is the same , and that the real struggle against tyranny lies elsewhere .
The two men who developed the two political philosophies are Karl Marx , and Karl Ritter .
From Pawns in the Game : Remember @ @ @ @ @ @ @ propaganda mind-control techniques in our culture our whole lives .
This was discussed in the “ Unmasking ” article , as the American secret intelligence agencies , such as the FBI and the CIA , control the media and shape our cultural values without most people even knowing it .
The “ Out of Shadows ” film released back in April this year also powerfully demonstrates this .
Therefore , when confronted with new information that challenges our assumed beliefs , our first reaction will be to discount them as “ That can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ it is healthy to examine one ’ s own beliefs critically , something that is dangerous to the Global authoritarians trying to setup a New World Order of automatons that they can control to obediently carry out their orders .
If your beliefs are solidly based on facts and the truth , then examining them critically will only make them stronger .
If , however , you find cracks in the foundations of what you believe to be true , investigating it further to make sure your beliefs are based on the truth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more confident person who does not have to succumb to fear .
I told someone I was talking to recently , that due to the very rapidly changing world around us right now , that I have probably been doing more study and research these days than I even did back in my college days as a student , as I try to unravel the propaganda and find the truth in the things happening today .
I have had major shifts in many of my own presuppositions and beliefs these past few months @ @ @ @ @ @ @ understand these changing times and what is unfolding before us , and what is likely to happen next as this agenda for a New World Order continues to unfold at an alarming rate .
So here are what I call my “ Top Nine Myths ” that I believe we have been conditioned to believe as true , and that are believed and seldom questioned by either side of this fake political debate between Right and Left , and what makes up the two political parties .
I will state right up front @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a collection of ancient writings that are authentic and reliable , while the Globalists want you to believe it is a book of fairy tales , even though significant portions of it are actually historical accounts , many of which have been backed up in recent times by archaeological discoveries .
If that bothers you , no need to read further .
Myth 1 : We all evolved from lower life forms .
This idea and theory , which really took root not long after the Illuminati were starting their modern New World @ @ @ @ @ @ @ started with the teachings of Charles Darwin in the 1800s , and has infiltrated academics to such an extent , particularly in the field of biology , that to take an opposing view is to be viewed as a “ quack ” who doesn ’ t believe in “ science.
” Unless you are well versed in this field , you probably are unaware that Darwin ’ s theories , particularly the theory of evolving into HIGHER life forms , has gone through many revisions and scientific in-fighting to try and reconcile more @ @ @ @ @ @ @ field of genetics and epi-genetics .
Those who oppose the theory of Darwinian Evolution are usually labeled as “ religious fanatics ” so that the concept of the separation of “ Church and State ” can be used as an excuse to keep critical scientific teaching about Darwinian Evolution out of the school systems , where it is taught as a scientific fact , even though it is really just a theory to explain where life came from .
But there is a branch of science called “ Intelligent Design ” which states @ @ @ @ @ @ @ master designer , and not random change evolutionary processes over billions of years .
Intelligent Design leaves the question of who the designer is to religion , while focusing on the scientific evidence found in nature and in archaeology .
Many of the beliefs of racial inequality ( racism ) depend upon the theory of Darwinian Evolution ( such as eugenics ) , rather than a Creator who creates all human beings equal .
The Globalists have to promote this myth to achieve their agenda of lowering the world ’ s population .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ evidence at all that the world is over-populated , and much evidence to the contrary .
It is said that if you lined up all the people of the world together , they would take up a space roughly the size of Texas .
The issue is not enough space to live , but unequal distribution of the world ’ s resources .
For example , about only 1 % of the population works in agriculture today in the U.S. , feeding the other 99 % .
This was not always so .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ War , about 50 % of the population was involved in agriculture .
The Global elites control the world ’ s monetary supply and fund wars to make sure they continue controlling the world ’ s resources ( including agriculture ) , and they continue to promote and teach the myth that the world is over-populated .
This myth is also needed to promote myth number 3 .
Myth 3 : It is irresponsible to have too many children .
Because they want you to believe that the world is over-populated , modern @ @ @ @ @ @ @ too expensive to have too many children that require more resources in order to raise them .
The Illuminati , on the other hand , value children maybe even more than they value money .
The child trafficking business today is far more lucrative than the illegal gun or drugs trades , and the number one destination for child sex slaves is the United States .
See : America # 1 in Child Sex Trafficking and Pedophilia – CPS and Foster Care are the Pipelines State Department Report : U.S. # 1 in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sex Slaves Come Out of Foster Care Infertility is at an all time high worldwide today , and many countries are already facing an imbalanced aging population versus babies being born , which will have tremendous economic impact on the labor force , unless of course , the Globalists get their way and significantly reduce the world ’ s population into a One World Government .
Planned Parenthood was started as a result of eugenics academic thought in an effort to take control of children , and while the Right condemns the Left @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of their views on abortion , they have their own problems with controlling children and taking them away from their families with the Christian Right being the biggest organization supporting child trafficking through their support of Adoption and Foster Care .
See : Christian Churches Redefine the Meaning of “ Orphan ” to Justify Participating in Child Trafficking Different approaches to “ planning families , ” but with similar results of “ family planning.
” Both sides support small families and limiting children , which begins the slippery slope of devaluing children .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ a gift from God because he created them , and no exceptions are given .
But both political philosophies believe that small families are good , and that too many children are bad .
The concept of the nuclear family , a father and mother with an average of two children , is a recent phenomenon in human history , and you can go all the way back to the beginning of television in the 1950s and 1960s and such “ wholesome ” shows like “ Leave it to Beaver , ” “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ I Love Lucy , ” and so many others that portrayed the modern , urban family as small , and “ normal.
” But while “ nuclear families ” are considered good families if they practice birth control and limit the number of children born , foster parents with big houses or “ youth centers ” who collect checks from the government for each child , somebody else ’ s child , they foster , are considered “ good people ” doing a noble thing .
So today , the primary group @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as a good thing are the Satanists and pedophiles in the Illuminati who want to eliminate parenthood and have the State raise and control children .
Do you think I am exaggerating to make a point ?
I can assure you , I am not !
As someone who has spent many years studying language in school and abroad , and as someone who has earned a living at teaching language , one of my favorite activities is studying the history of specific words , and how their usage has changed over time @ @ @ @ @ @ @ meaning quite a bit since it entered the English language is the word “ science.
” Our modern day English word “ science ” was originally a French word derived from Latin , and in the 1300 ’ s its meaning was very similar to the word “ knowledge.
” It meant the opposite of “ ignorance ” and generally meant something obtained by “ studying.
” It was not originally restricted in meaning to any particular branch of study .
In the 18th and 19th centuries its usage was becoming more restricted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ regular or methodical observations or propositions … concerning any subject or speculation , ” and was often linked to the study of “ philosophy.
” ( science .
Dictionary.com .
Online Etymology Dictionary .
Douglas Harper , Historian . )
This is when the Globalists began using the concept in academics to start achieving their goals , and a select educated class were considered the only ones who could really understand and interpret “ science ” because only the “ learned ” academians could truly understand it .
From the 20th century up @ @ @ @ @ @ @ science ” is restricted even further , as can be seen by this definition found in a medical dictionary : “ knowledge or a system of knowledge covering general truths or the operation of general laws especially as obtained and tested through the scientific method and concerned with the physical world and its phenomena.
” ( science .
Dictionary.com .
Merriam-Webster ’ s Medical Dictionary .
Merriam-Webster , Inc. ) This narrow understanding of “ science ” or “ knowledge , ” which only looks at what can be observed in the physical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ truth , ” and is considered by modern society to be more valuable than any other kind of knowledge .
It has become the religion of modern man , and the fuel that drives the tyrannical medical system .
Some dissenters in modern times have come up with the term “ Scientism ” instead , because it is really more like a religious belief , and they control all the medical journals that are the bible of this new religion , and it is not even disputed anymore that these medical journals are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ like The Pope and the King of England during the “ dark ages ” ruled over the masses by refusing to allow the Bible to be translated into the language of the common people , allowing them to “ interpret ” the meaning of the Bible so they could control the masses , today that religious belief that enslaves the masses is the religious belief in “ science , ” and science ’ s “ highest achievement , ” medicine , the new savior of mankind .
And only doctors and scientists are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ priests.
” Myth 5 : We are the most advanced civilization to ever live in history .
This myth is needed to keep the ruling class in power .
It is believed that technology has made us the most advanced civilization in the history of man .
Of course , they define “ technology ” as electronic technology .
The humanities and the arts are not considered important any longer , or at least secondary in importance to this new “ scientific technology.
” But when you study archaeology you discover relics @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other phenomenon that we no longer have the “ technology ” to build .
Some , rejecting the biblical literature as authentic , theorize alien races came here and setup some of this stuff , since we don ’ t have the knowledge ourselves to reproduce it any longer .
But according to the biblical records , the most advanced time in human history was just before the Noah flood , when there was allegedly a canopy above the earth that protected the environment .
People lived up to 900 years old before @ @ @ @ @ @ @ imagine what kinds of human achievement they accomplished !
Much of it was allegedly evil though , necessitating God to wipe out most of the population through the Great Flood , stories of which still remain in most of the world ’ s cultures today , aside from the biblical record .
Interestingly , the first descendants from Noah ’ s family , undoubtedly carrying the knowledge of pre-Flood days , achieved rapid advancement that led to the Tower of Babel story in Genesis chapter 11 .
The world population still had a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have been the last time that there was a One World Government in human history .
What was their “ sin ” that caused God to develop multiple languages among the people and scatter them , so that the nations of the world were then developed ?
Scholars disagree , but we know whatever it was , they were able to accomplish it because of a unified way of communicating with each other .
They probably had a ruling class as well .
It is highly doubtful that modern man has accomplished anything @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , before the population was scattered across the globe , some of them probably wandering around until they found caves to dwell in , which today are wrongly termed “ primitive ” where our culture shows “ cavemen ” as less evolved humans from our past , but would have been considered “ modern ” in those days , far removed from man ’ s “ primitive ” glory years before the Flood .
Myth 6 : If you ’ re sick , you need a doctor .
This is automatic , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this issue .
And yet , the modern medical system kills more people than any human disease , and has existed for a very short period of human history .
The medical system , developed by the Illuminati mainly through the powerful Rockefeller family , is ruled by a licensed class of professionals that does everything it can to suppress competition , and ignores thousands of years of history in natural medicine .
The Globalists can even use it today to scare people into believing they are going to die if they don @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and medical authorities tell them to do .
The Coronavirus Plandemic is maybe their greatest achievement , so far .
Both sides believe this , Left or Right , and about 95 % of the U.S. population willingly vaccinate their children .
But history shows that all infectious diseases were in the process of decreasing long before the vaccines were developed .
This is the most censored topic in the world today , where objecting voices from doctors and scientists are not allowed .
We have a whole website devoted to this topic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ many children each year , but nobody is out on the streets protesting this .
Myth 8 : Computers are , or will become , smarter than humans .
I grew up in the Star Trek generation .
This television franchise , much like the famed “ energizer bunny ” advertising batteries , just keeps on going and going .
The Star Ships are run like military vessels , and only one person on the ship can over-ride the authority of the Captain : The Doctor .
This conditions us to accept a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ultimate authority of the “ doctor , ” the “ Chief Medical Officer.
” Here is a scene from Star Trek : Voyager : Season 3 , Episode 12 , showing huge viruses killing people : American pop culture and science fiction shows have conditioned us for decades to fear things like fictional viruses .
President Trump ’ s team has even named their fast-track vaccine program for the Coronavirus vaccine , Operation Warp Speed , with “ warp ” being a fictional advanced technological engine that can travel many times the speed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Star Trek TV shows .
But here we are some 40 or 50 years later , and we still can not replicate food with a “ replicator , ” or transport human beings through a “ transporter ” that takes apart our atomic structure and “ beams ” it through space and puts you back together again instantly .
It ’ s all fake , and it is all based on the theory that electronic technology will advance us up the evolutionary chain quicker to achieve things like this .
Today , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ over the human race .
The old science fiction shows have androids , holograms and many other computer “ people ” that condition us to think of computers as being equal to human beings .
And while I am not discounting the dangers of technology and things like AI , they will never replace humans .
Humans are created by God , and have a spirit and a soul that makes them alive .
Computers have electricity as their “ life blood.
” Pull the plug out of the socket and they stop @ @ @ @ @ @ @ world ’ s problems are caused by The Left , or The Right .
Both sides believe that a political philosophy is the cause of the world ’ s problems .
And that ’ s just what the Globalists want , and need , to accomplish their purposes .
The Left and the Right both have a common enemy , an enemy I exposed in the “ Unmasking ” article .
The really important issues in life , as exemplified by these 9 myths , nobody is arguing about for the most part @ @ @ @ @ @ @ true .
And the longer we keep fighting each other and blaming each other for society ’ s problems , the stronger the REAL enemy becomes .
Copyright 2020 Health Impact News .
Free to republish using Creative Common standards with correct author attribution and links back to this original article .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
I have previously written about how the events unfolding very rapidly before us today are not accidental events, but planned events with a very specific goal, a New World Order. See:
The New World Order is being planned by very rich and very influential people who have been planning this for a long time. They want to reduce the world’s population and establish a single government to rule the world, along with a single belief system.
I have unmasked who is at the top of this group as well, and if you have not read that article which was published earlier this week (June 2020), please read that first to understand the context from which this article is based.
These global leaders, known as the Illuminati, control the world’s monetary system, and they fund the wars of the world as well, funding both sides. Wars are the primary way that they transfer the wealth of the common people to the richest 1% of the world.
While the history of these forces can be traced really all the way back to the beginning of the human race, the modern struggles that have caused wars started in Europe in the 1700s which funded the revolutions of most European kingdoms, and ushered in World War I, followed by World War II which started the beginning of the Industrial Age.
Since World War II there have been many regional wars that consolidated wealth for the rich central bankers, but war has also been redefined several times in more recent history with the “Cold War” relations between the U.S. and the old Soviet Union which allowed massive spending on defense systems, the “War on Terror” after 911, and most recently this year, 2020, the War Against the Unseen Enemy: The Coronavirus.
This last war, the war against the Coronavirus, might be the largest and quickest transfer of wealth from the common people to the Globalists that we have ever witnessed, as millions of people are out work, and thousands of businesses are closed, while BILLIONS are just handed over to Big Pharma to “save us” from this unseen enemy.
To make money from these wars, the Globalists who control the world’s monetary supply need conflict (something to stand for and fight against), and a large military to manage the wars.
As I discussed in the article “Unmasking Who is Behind the Plandemic and Rioting to Usher in the New World Order,” the political thought that is behind today’s political divide of “Left vs. Right” was written and put into action by the secret society known as the Illuminati back in the 1700s.
This is best documented in the book, Pawns in the Game, by William Guy Carr and published in the 1950s, which I discuss in detail in the “Unmasking” article.
While there are obviously real differences between the two parties, both sides end up with the same result: A New World Order run by the Illuminati who control the monetary system through the central banks. Historically they have funded both sides of the major world wars, because wars allow them to transfer wealth, and also to reduce the world’s population.
Most people holding to one side or the other in this political debate don’t even know that the end result is the same, and that the real struggle against tyranny lies elsewhere.
The two men who developed the two political philosophies are Karl Marx, and Karl Ritter.
From Pawns in the Game:
Karl Marx (1818-1883) was a German of Jewish descent. He was expelled from Germany, and afterwards from France, for his revolutionary activities. He was given asylum in England. In 1848 he published the Communist Manifesto. Marx admitted this long range plan, to turn the world into an International of Soviet Socialist Republics, may take centuries to accomplish. Karl Ritter (1779-1859) was a German Professor of History and Geopolitical science. He wrote the anti-thesis to Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto. He also drew up a plan by which he maintained the Aryan Race could first dominate Europe and then the entire world. Certain Atheistic leaders of the Aryan Group adopted Karl Ritter’s plan. They organized Naziism to further their secret ambitions to obtain ultimate control of the World and turn it into a Godless State, under their conception of a totalitarian dictatorship. This small group of men knew they must either join up with, or destroy, the power and influence of the International Bankers. It is doubtful if more than a mere handful of the top level leaders of the Communist and Fascist movements know their organizations are being used to further the secret ambitions of the Illuminati which are the High Priests of Satanism. According to the leaders of both atheistic groups the State must be Supreme. This being so the Head of the State is God on Earth. This belief brings into actual practice the deification of man. Much more is generally known about Karl Marx and Communism than about Karl Ritter and Naziism.
Remember, we have all been conditioned by propaganda mind-control techniques in our culture our whole lives. This was discussed in the “Unmasking” article, as the American secret intelligence agencies, such as the FBI and the CIA, control the media and shape our cultural values without most people even knowing it. The “Out of Shadows” film released back in April this year also powerfully demonstrates this.
Therefore, when confronted with new information that challenges our assumed beliefs, our first reaction will be to discount them as “That can’t be true!”
But it is healthy to examine one’s own beliefs critically, something that is dangerous to the Global authoritarians trying to setup a New World Order of automatons that they can control to obediently carry out their orders.
If your beliefs are solidly based on facts and the truth, then examining them critically will only make them stronger.
If, however, you find cracks in the foundations of what you believe to be true, investigating it further to make sure your beliefs are based on the truth will make you a stronger, and more confident person who does not have to succumb to fear.
I told someone I was talking to recently, that due to the very rapidly changing world around us right now, that I have probably been doing more study and research these days than I even did back in my college days as a student, as I try to unravel the propaganda and find the truth in the things happening today.
I have had major shifts in many of my own presuppositions and beliefs these past few months, that I think will help me understand these changing times and what is unfolding before us, and what is likely to happen next as this agenda for a New World Order continues to unfold at an alarming rate.
So here are what I call my “Top Nine Myths” that I believe we have been conditioned to believe as true, and that are believed and seldom questioned by either side of this fake political debate between Right and Left, and what makes up the two political parties.
I will state right up front here that I accept the Bible as a collection of ancient writings that are authentic and reliable, while the Globalists want you to believe it is a book of fairy tales, even though significant portions of it are actually historical accounts, many of which have been backed up in recent times by archaeological discoveries.
If that bothers you, no need to read further.
Myth 1: We all evolved from lower life forms.
This idea and theory, which really took root not long after the Illuminati were starting their modern New World Order plan and coming into power, started with the teachings of Charles Darwin in the 1800s, and has infiltrated academics to such an extent, particularly in the field of biology, that to take an opposing view is to be viewed as a “quack” who doesn’t believe in “science.”
Unless you are well versed in this field, you probably are unaware that Darwin’s theories, particularly the theory of evolving into HIGHER life forms, has gone through many revisions and scientific in-fighting to try and reconcile more modern scientific discoveries, particularly in the field of genetics and epi-genetics.
Those who oppose the theory of Darwinian Evolution are usually labeled as “religious fanatics” so that the concept of the separation of “Church and State” can be used as an excuse to keep critical scientific teaching about Darwinian Evolution out of the school systems, where it is taught as a scientific fact, even though it is really just a theory to explain where life came from.
But there is a branch of science called “Intelligent Design” which states that the scientific evidence points to a master designer, and not random chance evolutionary processes over billions of years. Intelligent Design leaves the question of who the designer is to religion, while focusing on the scientific evidence found in nature and in archaeology.
Many of the beliefs of racial inequality (racism) depend upon the theory of Darwinian Evolution (such as eugenics), rather than a Creator who creates all human beings equal.
Myth 2: The world is over-populated.
The Globalists have to promote this myth to achieve their agenda of lowering the world’s population. But the fact is there is no evidence at all that the world is over-populated, and much evidence to the contrary. It is said that if you lined up all the people of the world together, they would take up a space roughly the size of Texas.
The issue is not enough space to live, but unequal distribution of the world’s resources.
For example, about only 1% of the population works in agriculture today in the U.S., feeding the other 99%.
This was not always so.
When Lincoln was president during the Civil War, about 50% of the population was involved in agriculture.
The Global elites control the world’s monetary supply and fund wars to make sure they continue controlling the world’s resources (including agriculture), and they continue to promote and teach the myth that the world is over-populated. This myth is also needed to promote myth number 3.
Myth 3: It is irresponsible to have too many children.
Because they want you to believe that the world is over-populated, modern thought is that it is selfish and too expensive to have too many children that require more resources in order to raise them.
The Illuminati, on the other hand, value children maybe even more than they value money. The child trafficking business today is far more lucrative than the illegal gun or drugs trades, and the number one destination for child sex slaves is the United States. See:
Infertility is at an all time high worldwide today, and many countries are already facing an imbalanced aging population versus babies being born, which will have tremendous economic impact on the labor force, unless of course, the Globalists get their way and significantly reduce the world’s population into a One World Government.
Planned Parenthood was started as a result of eugenics academic thought in an effort to take control of children, and while the Right condemns the Left for supporting efforts like Planned Parenthood because of their views on abortion, they have their own problems with controlling children and taking them away from their families with the Christian Right being the biggest organization supporting child trafficking through their support of Adoption and Foster Care. See:
Different approaches to “planning families,” but with similar results of “family planning.” Both sides support small families and limiting children, which begins the slippery slope of devaluing children.
The Bible teaches that all children are a gift from God because he created them, and no exceptions are given. But both political philosophies believe that small families are good, and that too many children are bad.
The concept of the nuclear family, a father and mother with an average of two children, is a recent phenomenon in human history, and you can go all the way back to the beginning of television in the 1950s and 1960s and such “wholesome” shows like “Leave it to Beaver,” “The Dick Van Dyke Show,” “I Love Lucy,” and so many others that portrayed the modern, urban family as small, and “normal.”
But while “nuclear families” are considered good families if they practice birth control and limit the number of children born, foster parents with big houses or “youth centers” who collect checks from the government for each child, somebody else’s child, they foster, are considered “good people” doing a noble thing.
So today, the primary group that values having a lot of children as a good thing are the Satanists and pedophiles in the Illuminati who want to eliminate parenthood and have the State raise and control children.
Do you think I am exaggerating to make a point? I can assure you, I am not!
Myth 4: Evidence-based science determines truth.
As someone who has spent many years studying language in school and abroad, and as someone who has earned a living at teaching language, one of my favorite activities is studying the history of specific words, and how their usage has changed over time. One word that has changed in meaning quite a bit since it entered the English language is the word “science.”
Our modern day English word “science” was originally a French word derived from Latin, and in the 1300’s its meaning was very similar to the word “knowledge.” It meant the opposite of “ignorance” and generally meant something obtained by “studying.”
It was not originally restricted in meaning to any particular branch of study. In the 18th and 19th centuries its usage was becoming more restricted, referring to a “body of regular or methodical observations or propositions … concerning any subject or speculation,” and was often linked to the study of “philosophy.”(science. Dictionary.com. Online Etymology Dictionary. Douglas Harper, Historian.)
This is when the Globalists began using the concept in academics to start achieving their goals, and a select educated class were considered the only ones who could really understand and interpret “science” because only the “learned” academians could truly understand it.
From the 20th century up until today, the meaning of “science” is restricted even further, as can be seen by this definition found in a medical dictionary: “knowledge or a system of knowledge covering general truths or the operation of general laws especially as obtained and tested through the scientific method and concerned with the physical world and its phenomena.” (science. Dictionary.com. Merriam-Webster’s Medical Dictionary. Merriam-Webster, Inc.)
This narrow understanding of “science” or “knowledge,” which only looks at what can be observed in the physical realm, is now equated with “truth,” and is considered by modern society to be more valuable than any other kind of knowledge.
It has become the religion of modern man, and the fuel that drives the tyrannical medical system. Some dissenters in modern times have come up with the term “Scientism” instead, because it is really more like a religious belief, and they control all the medical journals that are the bible of this new religion, and it is not even disputed anymore that these medical journals are thoroughly corrupt.
So while religious leaders like The Pope and the King of England during the “dark ages” ruled over the masses by refusing to allow the Bible to be translated into the language of the common people, allowing them to “interpret” the meaning of the Bible so they could control the masses, today that religious belief that enslaves the masses is the religious belief in “science,” and science’s “highest achievement,” medicine, the new savior of mankind.
And only doctors and scientists are qualified to interpret it: the new “priests.”
More on Scientism.
Myth 5: We are the most advanced civilization to ever live in history.
This myth is needed to keep the ruling class in power. It is believed that technology has made us the most advanced civilization in the history of man.
Of course, they define “technology” as electronic technology. The humanities and the arts are not considered important any longer, or at least secondary in importance to this new “scientific technology.”
But when you study archaeology you discover relics like the Great Pyramids in Egypt and other phenomenon that we no longer have the “technology” to build. Some, rejecting the biblical literature as authentic, theorize alien races came here and setup some of this stuff, since we don’t have the knowledge ourselves to reproduce it any longer.
But according to the biblical records, the most advanced time in human history was just before the Noah flood, when there was allegedly a canopy above the earth that protected the environment. People lived up to 900 years old before the flood, and one can only imagine what kinds of human achievement they accomplished!
Much of it was allegedly evil though, necessitating God to wipe out most of the population through the Great Flood, stories of which still remain in most of the world’s cultures today, aside from the biblical record.
Interestingly, the first descendants from Noah’s family, undoubtedly carrying the knowledge of pre-Flood days, achieved rapid advancement that led to the Tower of Babel story in Genesis chapter 11. The world population still had a single world language, and that might have been the last time that there was a One World Government in human history.
What was their “sin” that caused God to develop multiple languages among the people and scatter them, so that the nations of the world were then developed?
Scholars disagree, but we know whatever it was, they were able to accomplish it because of a unified way of communicating with each other. They probably had a ruling class as well.
It is highly doubtful that modern man has accomplished anything close to the technology they had then, before the population was scattered across the globe, some of them probably wandering around until they found caves to dwell in, which today are wrongly termed “primitive” where our culture shows “cavemen” as less evolved humans from our past, but would have been considered “modern” in those days, far removed from man’s “primitive” glory years before the Flood.
Myth 6: If you’re sick, you need a doctor.
This is automatic, and obviously Right vs. Left never argue about this issue. And yet, the modern medical system kills more people than any human disease, and has existed for a very short period of human history.
The medical system, developed by the Illuminati mainly through the powerful Rockefeller family, is ruled by a licensed class of professionals that does everything it can to suppress competition, and ignores thousands of years of history in natural medicine.
The Globalists can even use it today to scare people into believing they are going to die if they don’t do exactly what the doctors and medical authorities tell them to do.
The Coronavirus Plandemic is maybe their greatest achievement, so far.
Myth 7: Vaccines wiped out many diseases.
Both sides believe this, Left or Right, and about 95% of the U.S. population willingly vaccinate their children.
But history shows that all infectious diseases were in the process of decreasing long before the vaccines were developed.
This is the most censored topic in the world today, where objecting voices from doctors and scientists are not allowed. We have a whole website devoted to this topic: VaccineImpact.com.
Vaccines kill and maim many children each year, but nobody is out on the streets protesting this.
Myth 8: Computers are, or will become, smarter than humans.
I grew up in the Star Trek generation. This television franchise, much like the famed “energizer bunny” advertising batteries, just keeps on going and going. The Star Ships are run like military vessels, and only one person on the ship can over-ride the authority of the Captain: The Doctor.
This conditions us to accept a military way of life, and the ultimate authority of the “doctor,” the “Chief Medical Officer.”
Here is a scene from Star Trek: Voyager: Season 3, Episode 12, showing huge viruses killing people:
American pop culture and science fiction shows have conditioned us for decades to fear things like fictional viruses.
President Trump’s team has even named their fast-track vaccine program for the Coronavirus vaccine, Operation Warp Speed, with “warp” being a fictional advanced technological engine that can travel many times the speed of light through space, originating from Star Trek TV shows.
But here we are some 40 or 50 years later, and we still cannot replicate food with a “replicator,” or transport human beings through a “transporter” that takes apart our atomic structure and “beams” it through space and puts you back together again instantly.
It’s all fake, and it is all based on the theory that electronic technology will advance us up the evolutionary chain quicker to achieve things like this.
Today, the fear is that Artificial Intelligence will take over the human race. The old science fiction shows have androids, holograms and many other computer “people” that condition us to think of computers as being equal to human beings.
And while I am not discounting the dangers of technology and things like AI, they will never replace humans.
Humans are created by God, and have a spirit and a soul that makes them alive.
Computers have electricity as their “life blood.” Pull the plug out of the socket (or disconnect them from their batteries) and they stop functioning immediately.
Myth 9: The world’s problems are caused by The Left, or The Right.
Both sides believe that a political philosophy is the cause of the world’s problems. And that’s just what the Globalists want, and need, to accomplish their purposes.
The Left and the Right both have a common enemy, an enemy I exposed in the “Unmasking” article.
The really important issues in life, as exemplified by these 9 myths, nobody is arguing about for the most part, because both sides hold them as true.
And the longer we keep fighting each other and blaming each other for society’s problems, the stronger the REAL enemy becomes.
Copyright 2020 Health Impact News. Free to republish using Creative Common standards with correct author attribution and links back to this original article.
—————
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-06-05--British Prime Minister Boris Johnson Surrenders To Bill Gates And The Vaccine Cartel

British Prime Minister Channels Churchill As He Surrenders To Gates And The Vaccine Cartel by John Stone UK Editor of Age of Autism This is the moment of national humiliation that we somehow did not see on our television sets last night : British Prime Minister Boris Johnson surrendering to Bill Gates and the vaccine cartel , GAVI , hailed by him as the new NATO – while he speaks from a nation on its knees like Vichy France .
While British news after months of wall to wall Coronavirus suddenly , mysteriously became obsessed with the 13 year old @ @ @ @ @ @ @ saw Johnson ’ s insipid , but rhetorically overblown speech at the end of the global summit he hosted in London yesterday and chaired with Gates .
No one knew when they were electing Johnson that they were electing Gates and putting the vaccine industry at the heart of the British nation ’ s future .
It was particularly galling to see him extol the already failed Oxford COVID vaccine as an example of British innovation .
This is presumably where we were headed from the moment lockdown was announced .
The meeting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the BBC 10 o ’ clock news and was not mentioned on the front pages of any of the national newspapers this morning .
If GAVI is the new NATO , and the focus of British national destiny perhaps the moment should not have been news managed out of existence .
Now everything that our lives were worth has to be surrendered in an endless war against disease long ago devised by Mr Gates .
In Gates ’ s brave new world everyone will have to have vaccines like computer patches every @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ t work – if we are still standing – we will have to have another .
John Stone is UK Editor of Age of Autism Posted June 05 , 2020 Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist ( kidney doctor ) , Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people .
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ethical medicine .
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines , no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public .
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children , and even adults .
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact , part of the Health Impact News network .

British Prime Minister Channels Churchill As He Surrenders To Gates And The Vaccine Cartel
by John Stone
UK Editor of Age of Autism
This is the moment of national humiliation that we somehow did not see on our television sets last night: British Prime Minister Boris Johnson surrendering to Bill Gates and the vaccine cartel, GAVI, hailed by him as the new NATO – while he speaks from a nation on its knees like Vichy France. While British news after months of wall to wall Coronavirus suddenly, mysteriously became obsessed with the 13 year old saga of Madeleine McCann almost no one saw Johnson’s insipid, but rhetorically overblown speech at the end of the global summit he hosted in London yesterday and chaired with Gates.
No one knew when they were electing Johnson that they were electing Gates and putting the vaccine industry at the heart of the British nation’s future. It was particularly galling to see him extol the already failed Oxford COVID vaccine as an example of British innovation. This is presumably where we were headed from the moment lockdown was announced. The meeting elicited a short mention at the end of the BBC 10 o’clock news and was not mentioned on the front pages of any of the national newspapers this morning.
If GAVI is the new NATO, and the focus of British national destiny perhaps the moment should not have been news managed out of existence. Now everything that our lives were worth has to be surrendered in an endless war against disease long ago devised by Mr Gates. In Gates’s brave new world everyone will have to have vaccines like computer patches every five minutes, and when they don’t work – if we are still standing – we will have to have another.
John Stone is UK Editor of Age of Autism Posted June 05, 2020
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.
See Also:
Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Book – The Vaccine Court “The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program” ORDER HERE!
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
Order here!
Make a Statement for Health Freedom!
Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children, and even adults.
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact, part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!


healthimpactnews--2020-06-05--Editors of The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine: Pharmaceutical Companies are so Finan

Editors of The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine: Pharmaceutical Companies are so Financially Powerful They Pressure us to Accept Papers

Philippe Douste-Blazy , MD , is a cardiologist and former French Health Minister who served as Under-Secretary General of the United Nations .
He was a candidate in 2017 for Director of the World Health Organization .
In a videotaped interview on May 24 , 2020 , Dr. Douste-Blazy provided insight into how a series of negative hydroxychloroquine studies got published in prestigious medical journals .
He revealed that at a recent Chatham House top secret , closed door meeting attended by experts only , the editors of both , The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine expressed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ them by pharmaceutical companies .
He states that each of the editors used the word “ criminal ” to describe the erosion of science .
He quotes Dr. Richard Horton who bemoaned the current state of science : The journal SCIENCE described the response to French President Emmanuel Macron trip to Marseille to meet Dr. Raoult who prescribes the combination drug regimen and he has documented their effectiveness .
However , public health officials , academic physicians and the media – all of who are financially indebted to pharmaceutical companies and their high @ @ @ @ @ @ @ use of HCQ , and use every opportunity to disparage the drug by derisively referring to President Trump as its booster .
The Lancet Published a Fraudulent Study : Editor Calls it “ Department of Error ” On May 22 , 2020 , The Lancet published “ Hydroxychloroquine or Chloroquine With or Without A Macrolide For Treatment of COVID-19 : a Multinational Registry Analysis ” .
It was described as an observational study purportedly involving more than 96,000 hospitalized Covid-19 patients in 671 hospitals across six continents .
What was not disclosed is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have significant , relevant financial conflicts of interest that just may have biased the reported findings .
• The database belongs to Surgisphere Corporation whose founder and CEO , is Dr. Sapan Desai , who is a lead co-author of the study .
Dr. Desai has refused to disclose the data – for independent confirmatory review .
In fact , he refuses to identify the participating hospitals , or even the countries .
• Dr. Mandeep Mehra , the lead co-author is a director at Brigham & Women ’ s Hospital , which @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dr. Mehra and The Lancet failed to disclose that Brigham Hospital has a partnership with Gilead and is currently conducting TWO trials testing Remdesivir , the prime competitor of hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19 , the focus of the study .
The Lancet report claimed that COVID-19 “ patients treated with hydroxychloroquine ( with or without a macrolide ) were at increased risk of de-novo ventricular arrhythmia and ‘ a greater hazard for in-hospital death.
’ ” Such an alarming finding from an inaccessible dataset should have raised concerns for the editor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the study and the accuracy of the claimed findings .
In fact , within days of the Lancet publication , concerns about that dataset were raised on social media , on PubPeer , the post-publication discussion website , and in newspapers .
Within days of publication , Dr. Anthony Fauci , head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ( NIAID ) declared on CNN A media blitz against hydroxychloroquine ( HCQ ) created panic : clinical trials aimed at testing hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 were suspended by International public health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ UK government regulatory agency and the French government .
The chief scientist at the WHO , Soumya Swaminathan , stated that although the Lancet data weren ’ t from a randomized controlled trial , the data were compelling because they Knowledgeable scientists and experienced clinicians around the world were skeptical The alarming findings and serious negative impact of the Lancet report led numerous scientists around the globe to scrutinize the report in detail .
That scrutiny by legitimate , independent scientists has led to many serious questions about the integrity of the study @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and the validity of the methods the authors used .
An Open Letter posted online , is addressed to the authors of the report : Mandeep R Mehra , MD , Sapan S Desai , MD , Frank Ruschitzka , MD , Amit N Patel , MD , and to the editor , Dr. Richard Horton .
The letter was signed by more than 200 prominent scientists across the world , including 17 from institutions in Africa .
The scientists question the evidence for claimed serious risks posed from the use of hydroxychloroquine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ raised by the scientists are the following : • A range of gross deviations from standard research and clinical practices , such as : patients were prescribed inexplicably high daily doses of hydroxychloroquine –far higher than the FDA-recommended doses .
• There was no ethics review .
• The number of patients reportedly from Australia far exceeded the number of patients in the Australian government database ; .
• Gross misrepresentation of the numbers of deaths in Australia .
• “ Both the number of cases and deaths [ the claimed 40 % @ @ @ @ @ @ @ details provide seem unlikely.
” • Refusal to identify the hospitals that contributed patient data .
• The ratios of patients who received chloroquine ( 49 % ) to those who received hydroxychloroquine ( 50 % ) are implausible ; in Australia chloroquine is not available without special government authorization .
The Guardian reported on May 28th that it could not confirm that UK ’ s health agencies had even provided data for the study .
On May 29th The New York Times reported that 100 scientists and clinicians raised serious questions about @ @ @ @ @ @ @ findings .
It reported that on May 29th Dr. Mehra issued the following statement : [ Perhaps someone can translate what “ leveraged the data ” means ….
?
The Times understated the number of scientists who signed the open letter ; it is closer to 220 . ]
Dr. James Watson , senior scientist at the MORU-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit in Thailand doubts that any research organization could have obtained such detailed massive records for so many people in Africa that quickly .
Based on healthcare workers ’ descriptions of medical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , he indicated : Dr. Watson contributed concerns regarding the African data to the Open Letter .
He had to suspend a just-launched trial of HCQ to comply with UK regulators following the Lancet report .
Dr. Anthony Etyang , a consultant physician and clinical epidemiologist with the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme in Kenya , who is also a signatory to the Open Letter , wrote to The Scientist expressing his doubts about the numbers of African patients in the Surgisphere dataset , noting that even private hospitals on the continent have poor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ serious issues raised about the integrity of the report , The Lancet editor posted the authors ’ claimed to “ correction ” of the numbers of patients in Asia and Australia on a page designated “ Department of Error ” – whatever that means !
• The nature and number of the serious “ discrepancies ” that have emerged following the Lancet publication of the Surgisphere “ study , ” lead one to suspect out-and-out FRAUD .
Disputed Hydroxychloroquine Study Brings Scrutiny to Surgisphere , an investigative report by Catherine Offord in The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ looked deeper than others and uncovered background information about Dr. Desai and the changes in Surgisphere ’ s product line and his marketing methods .
In 2008 , Surgisphere was the publisher of medical textbooks that ran afoul when physicians complained about falsified rave reviews .
In 2010 , Surgisphere became a high impact , online medical journal , whose website boasts that it The Journal of Surgical Radiology had a three-year run ; its last issue was published in January 2013 .
The Scientist reports that Dr. Desai is named in three @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the second half of 2019 .
Additional disturbing facts about Surgisphere have been uncovered by a team of investigative reporters — Melissa Davey , Stephanie Kirchgaessner , and Sarah Boseley – for The Guardian .
The fiasco of the publication of essentially fraudulent reports in the journals with the greatest impact on both clinical treatment and public health policies , reveals how thoroughly corrupted so-called peer review has become because it lacks external , independent review by scientists who have NO STAKE in the study outcome .
It was only after the reports @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the editors of The NEJM and The Lancet were compelled to issue an : “ Expression of concern.
” This fiasco demonstrates why intelligent people seek alternative sources for reliable information .
The website , Science Defies Politics exposes numerous scientifically invalid studies that were essentially “ hit jobs ” against the use of hydroxychloroquine .
WHY are very powerful corporate-government stakeholders so intent on killing a drug with a 70 year track record ?
Because the drug works against the pandemic ; it is readily available , and costs very little .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ to both pharma companies and their partners in government and academia , those who are intent on profiting from the COVID-19 pandemic .
As uncovered by Science Defies Politics : 16 of the panel members selected by NIH to formulate the official COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines – including two of the three co-chairs – were paid by Gilead .
They issued guidelines that raised fear , uncertainty , and doubt about the use of HCQ combined with AZ , while raising no fear , doubt , or uncertainty about using Gilead ’ s unproven @ @ @ @ @ @ @ drug that has shown mediocre performance in clinical trials .
Seven of the NIH panelists failed to disclose their financial ties to Gilead .
They are listed here .
The medical scientific literature is infested with financially motivated , shoddy , studies aimed at promoting products and , when a life-saving , non-patentable product , proves effective , scientists are hired to author study reports that are designed to tarnish scientists ’ reputations , and to proclaim findings that refute legitimate findings .
In this case , studies designed to “ debunk ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Examples of countries and physicians who have witnessed the effectiveness of the HCQ – Az combination as a treatment for covid-19 , are viewed by corporate-government collaborating partners as posing a major threat to their marketing agendas .
For example , Senegal and India are putting their hopes in hydroxychloroquine , marketed by Sanofi , under the trade name Plaquenil .
A Sanofi spokesperson stated : On May 23rd the Indian Council of Medical Research ( ICMR ) issued expanded revised guidelines for use of hydroxychloroquine ( HCQ ) for COVID-19 : Didier @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a Science Star ” — as the NYT described him in a recent profile , who has identified 500 novel species of human-borne bacteria ; a scientist known all over the world as the discoverer of the first giant virus , a discovery that earned him the Grand Prix , one of France ’ s most prestigious awards .
Dr. Raoult is the founder and director of the research hospital , the Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Méditerranée Infection ( IHU ) .
He is a professor on the faculty of Medicine of Ais-Marseille University , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the director of the Infectious and Tropical Emergent Diseases Research Unit ) , which employs more than 200 people and runs a hospital with 3,700 patients .
He has more than 2,300 indexed publications and was classified among the ten leading French researchers by the journal Nature .
Dr. Raoult has a reputation for bluster but also for creativity that others lack .
As the Times noted , “ He looks where no one else cares to , with methods no one else is using , and [ he ] finds things.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ combination of two cheap , widely prescribed medicines : hydroxychloroquine and the antibiotic azithromycin , as a treatment of choice against Covid-19 , Dr. Raoult has become the subject of intense demonization by the corporate-influenced medical establishment , the media , and the who resort to this tactic whenever they lack evidence or legitimate grounds to support public health policies that cause people harm .
Their fallback tactic is to demonize every doctor who challenges them and refuses to adhere to their financially – driven prescribing decrees .
Dr. Raoult ’ s latest @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Management of COVID-19 Patients : A Real-Life Cohort study of 3,737 Patients , Marseille , France was posted on May 27 , 2020 , In France , doctors who have followed the research of Dr. Raoult , and have themselves witnessed the effectiveness of the HCQ-AZ combination , are suing the government .
They demand the right to treat their patients with these drugs before easing of the lockdown .
They seek to prevent complications and deaths from a second wave of Covid-19 .
Dr. Violaine Guérin , an endocrinologist who conducted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID-19 , and their families , reported her study findings that demonstrated the effectiveness of prescribing HCQ combined with azithromycin at the first sign of symptoms .
The drugs substantially reduced the viral load of Covid-19 : Dr. Guérin recommends prescribing hydroxychloroquine for health workers infected by the coronavirus , which is outside of its approved uses .
Health unions in France warned that almost 12,000 health care professionals out of 550,000 – roughly a quarter of the country ’ s health force – were sick with Covid-19 .
Dr. Guérin recommends its @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Soon after this favorable study was published , the Minister of Health Olivier Veran in bald political arm twisting fashion , asked the highest health authority to review its authorization for the use of HCQ to treat Covid , suggesting further restriction .
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist ( kidney doctor ) , Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real , ethical medicine .
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines , no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public .
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children , and even adults .
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact , part of the Health Impact News network .

Lancet Editor Spills the Beans
by Vera Sharav
Alliance for Human Research Protection
Philippe Douste-Blazy, MD, is a cardiologist and former French Health Minister who served as Under-Secretary General of the United Nations. He was a candidate in 2017 for Director of the World Health Organization.
In a videotaped interview on May 24, 2020, Dr. Douste-Blazy provided insight into how a series of negative hydroxychloroquine studies got published in prestigious medical journals.
He revealed that at a recent Chatham House top secret, closed door meeting attended by experts only, the editors of both The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine expressed their exasperation, citing the pressures put on them by pharmaceutical companies.
He states that each of the editors used the word “criminal” to describe the erosion of science.
He quotes Dr. Richard Horton who bemoaned the current state of science:
“If this continues, we are not going to be able to publish any more clinical research data because pharmaceutical companies are so financially powerful; they are able to pressure us to accept papers that are apparently methodologically perfect, but their conclusion is what pharmaceutical companies want.”
Dr. Douste-Blazy supports the combination treatment –hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and azithromycin (AZ) for Covid-19 recommended by Dr. Didier Raoult. In April, 2020 Dr. Douste-Blazy started a petition that has been signed by almost 500,000 French doctors and citizens urging French government officials to permit physicians to prescribe hydroxychloroquine to treat coronavirus patients early, before they require intensive care. The issue has become highly politicized; the left-leaning politicians and public health officials are adamantly against the use of HCQ, whereas those leaning toward the right politically are for the right of doctors to prescribe the drug as they see fit.
The journal SCIENCE described the response to French President Emmanuel Macron trip to Marseille to meet Dr. Raoult who prescribes the combination drug regimen and he has documented their effectiveness.
However, public health officials, academic physicians and the media – all of who are financially indebted to pharmaceutical companies and their high profit marketing objectives – vehemently oppose the use of HCQ, and use every opportunity to disparage the drug by derisively referring to President Trump as its booster.
The Lancet Published a Fraudulent Study: Editor Calls it “Department of Error”
by Vera Sharav
Alliance for Human Research Protection
On May 22, 2020, The Lancet published “Hydroxychloroquine or Chloroquine With or Without A Macrolide For Treatment of COVID-19: a Multinational Registry Analysis”. It was described as an observational study purportedly involving more than 96,000 hospitalized Covid-19 patients in 671 hospitals across six continents. What was not disclosed is the fact that the two lead co-authors have significant, relevant financial conflicts of interest that just may have biased the reported findings.
The database belongs to Surgisphere Corporation whose founder and CEO, is Dr. Sapan Desai, who is a lead co-author of the study. Dr. Desai has refused to disclose the data – for independent confirmatory review. In fact, he refuses to identify the participating hospitals, or even the countries.
Dr. Mandeep Mehra, the lead co-author is a director at Brigham & Women’s Hospital, which is credited with funding the study. Dr. Mehra and The Lancet failed to disclose that Brigham Hospital has a partnership with Gilead and is currently conducting TWO trials testing Remdesivir, the prime competitor of hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19, the focus of the study.
The Lancet report claimed that COVID-19 “patients treated with hydroxychloroquine (with or without a macrolide) were at increased risk of de-novo ventricular arrhythmia and ‘a greater hazard for in-hospital death.’” Such an alarming finding from an inaccessible dataset should have raised concerns for the editor of the Lancet, about the integrity of the study and the accuracy of the claimed findings. In fact, within days of the Lancet publication, concerns about that dataset were raised on social media, on PubPeer, the post-publication discussion website, and in newspapers.
Within days of publication, Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) declared on CNN
“The scientific data is really quite evident now about the lack of efficacy.”
A media blitz against hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) created panic: clinical trials aimed at testing hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 were suspended by International public health institutions including the World Health Organization the UK government regulatory agency and the French government.
The chief scientist at the WHO, Soumya Swaminathan, stated that although the Lancet data weren’t from a randomized controlled trial, the data were compelling because they
“came from multiple registries and quite a large number of patients, 96,000 patients.”
Knowledgeable scientists and experienced clinicians around the world were skeptical
The alarming findings and serious negative impact of the Lancet report led numerous scientists around the globe to scrutinize the report in detail. That scrutiny by legitimate, independent scientists has led to many serious questions about the integrity of the study, the authenticity of the data, and the validity of the methods the authors used.
An Open Letter posted online, is addressed to the authors of the report: Mandeep R Mehra, MD, Sapan S Desai, MD, Frank Ruschitzka, MD, Amit N Patel, MD, and to the editor, Dr. Richard Horton. The letter was signed by more than 200 prominent scientists across the world, including 17 from institutions in Africa.
The scientists question the evidence for claimed serious risks posed from the use of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 patients. Among the concerns raised by the scientists are the following:
A range of gross deviations from standard research and clinical practices, such as: patients were prescribed inexplicably high daily doses of hydroxychloroquine –far higher than the FDA-recommended doses.
–far higher than the FDA-recommended doses. There was no ethics review.
The number of patients reportedly from Australia far exceeded the number of patients in the Australian government database;.
Gross misrepresentation of the numbers of deaths in Australia.
“Both the number of cases and deaths [the claimed 40% deaths in Africa], and the details provide seem unlikely.”
Refusal to identify the hospitals that contributed patient data.
The ratios of patients who received chloroquine (49 %) to those who received hydroxychloroquine (50% ) are implausible; in Australia chloroquine is not available without special government authorization.
The Guardian reported on May 28th that it could not confirm that UK’s health agencies had even provided data for the study.
On May 29th The New York Times reported that 100 scientists and clinicians raised serious questions about the validity of the The Lancet report findings. It reported that on May 29th Dr. Mehra issued the following statement:
“We leveraged the data available through Surgisphere to provide observational guidance to inform the care of hospitalized Covid-19 patients”
[Perhaps someone can translate what “leveraged the data” means ….? The Times understated the number of scientists who signed the open letter; it is closer to 220.]
Dr. James Watson, senior scientist at the MORU-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit in Thailand doubts that any research organization could have obtained such detailed massive records for so many people in Africa that quickly. Based on healthcare workers’ descriptions of medical record-keeping, at many hospitals in Africa, he indicated:
“I just find it very hard to believe.”
Dr. Watson contributed concerns regarding the African data to the Open Letter. He had to suspend a just-launched trial of HCQ to comply with UK regulators following the Lancet report.
Dr. Anthony Etyang, a consultant physician and clinical epidemiologist with the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme in Kenya, who is also a signatory to the Open Letter, wrote to The Scientist expressing his doubts about the numbers of African patients in the Surgisphere dataset, noting that even private hospitals on the continent have poor medical records.
Rather than investigating the serious issues raised about the integrity of the report, The Lancet editor posted the authors’ claimed to “correction” of the numbers of patients in Asia and Australia on a page designated “Department of Error” – whatever that means!
The nature and number of the serious “discrepancies” that have emerged following the Lancet publication of the Surgisphere “study,” lead one to suspect out-and-out FRAUD.
Disputed Hydroxychloroquine Study Brings Scrutiny to Surgisphere, an investigative report by Catherine Offord in The SCIENTIST, May 30, 2020, looked deeper than others and uncovered background information about Dr. Desai and the changes in Surgisphere’s product line and his marketing methods. In 2008, Surgisphere was the publisher of medical textbooks that ran afoul when physicians complained about falsified rave reviews. In 2010, Surgisphere became a high impact, online medical journal, whose website boasts that it
“accrued over 50,000 subscribers spanning almost every country around the world… with almost one million page views per month.”
The Journal of Surgical Radiology had a three-year run; its last issue was published in January 2013.
The Scientist reports that Dr. Desai is named in three medical malpractice lawsuits that were filed during the second half of 2019.
Additional disturbing facts about Surgisphere have been uncovered by a team of investigative reporters — Melissa Davey, Stephanie Kirchgaessner, and Sarah Boseley – for The Guardian.
Surgisphere, the company that provided the database for studies published by two of the world’s leading medical journals – The Lancet and The New England Journal of Medicine – based on Surgisphere data. The studies were co-authored the hydroxychloroquine studies. “Surgisphere’s employees have little or no data or scientific background. An employee listed as a science editor appears to be a science fiction author and fantasy artist. Another employee listed as a marketing executive is an adult model and events hostess… until Monday, the “get in touch” link on Surgisphere’s homepage redirected to a WordPress template for a cryptocurrency website, raising questions about how hospitals could easily contact the company to join its database.”
The fiasco of the publication of essentially fraudulent reports in the journals with the greatest impact on both clinical treatment and public health policies, reveals how thoroughly corrupted so-called peer review has become because it lacks external, independent review by scientists who have NO STAKE in the study outcome. It was only after the reports by The Scientist andThe Guardian, that the editors of The NEJM and The Lancet were compelled to issue an: “Expression of concern.” This fiasco demonstrates why intelligent people seek alternative sources for reliable information.
The website, Science Defies Politics exposes numerous scientifically invalid studies that were essentially “hit jobs” against the use of hydroxychloroquine.
WHY are very powerful corporate-government stakeholders so intent on killing a drug with a 70 year track record? Because the drug works against the pandemic; it is readily available, and costs very little. Therefore, it poses a financial threat to both pharma companies and their partners in government and academia, those who are intent on profiting from the COVID-19 pandemic.
As uncovered by Science Defies Politics: 16 of the panel members selected by NIH to formulate the official COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines – including two of the three co-chairs – were paid by Gilead. They issued guidelines that raised fear, uncertainty, and doubt about the use of HCQ combined with AZ, while raising no fear, doubt, or uncertainty about using Gilead’s unproven, unapproved, drug remdesivir; a drug that has shown mediocre performance in clinical trials. Seven of the NIH panelists failed to disclose their financial ties to Gilead. They are listed here.
The medical scientific literature is infested with financially motivated, shoddy, studies aimed at promoting products and, when a life-saving, non-patentable product, proves effective, scientists are hired to author study reports that are designed to tarnish scientists’ reputations, and to proclaim findings that refute legitimate findings. In this case, studies designed to “debunk” the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine against COVID-19.
Examples of countries and physicians who have witnessed the effectiveness of the HCQ – Az combination as a treatment for covid-19, are viewed by corporate-government collaborating partners as posing a major threat to their marketing agendas.
For example, Senegal and India are putting their hopes in hydroxychloroquine, marketed by Sanofi, under the trade name Plaquenil. A Sanofi spokesperson stated:
“We are providing the drug to hospitals and doctors to enable them to carry out clinical trials to determine whether hydroxychloroquine is effective or not, but not to treat Covid-19.”
On May 23rd the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) issued expanded revised guidelines for use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for COVID-19:
“The Joint Monitoring Group and the NTF have recommended prophylactic use of HCQ in asymptomatic frontline workers, such as surveillance workers deployed in containment zones and paramilitary/police personnel involved in Covid-19 related activities, asymptomatic household contacts of laboratory confirmed cases and all asymptomatic healthcare workers involved in containment and treatment of Covid-19 and working in non-Covid hospitals/non-Covid areas of Covid hospitals/blocks.”
Didier Raoult, MD, PhD — “a Science Star” — as the NYT described him in a recent profile, who has identified 500 novel species of human-borne bacteria; a scientist known all over the world as the discoverer of the first giant virus, a discovery that earned him the Grand Prix, one of France’s most prestigious awards.
Dr. Raoult is the founder and director of the research hospital, the Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Méditerranée Infection (IHU). He is a professor on the faculty of Medicine of Ais-Marseille University, and since 2008, he has been the director of the Infectious and Tropical Emergent Diseases Research Unit), which employs more than 200 people and runs a hospital with 3,700 patients. He has more than 2,300 indexed publications and was classified among the ten leading French researchers by the journal Nature. Dr. Raoult has a reputation for bluster but also for creativity that others lack. As the Times noted, “He looks where no one else cares to, with methods no one else is using, and [he] finds things.”
Since publishing favorable reports about a treatment combination of two cheap, widely prescribed medicines: hydroxychloroquine and the antibiotic azithromycin, as a treatment of choice against Covid-19, Dr. Raoult has become the subject of intense demonization by the corporate-influenced medical establishment, the media, and the who resort to this tactic whenever they lack evidence or legitimate grounds to support public health policies that cause people harm. Their fallback tactic is to demonize every doctor who challenges them and refuses to adhere to their financially – driven prescribing decrees.
Dr. Raoult’s latest scientific report about HCQ, Early Diagnosis and Management of COVID-19 Patients: A Real-Life Cohort study of 3,737 Patients, Marseille, France was posted on May 27, 2020,
It is a retrospective study report of the clinical management of 3,737 patients, including 3,054 (81.7%) treated with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin (HCQ-AZ) for at least three days and 683 (18.3%) patients treated with other methods. Outcomes were death, transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU), ≥ 10 days of hospitalization and viral shedding. “Treatment with HCQ-AZ was associated with a decreased risk of transfer to the ICU or death (HR 0.19 0.12-0.29), decreased risk of hospitalization ≥10 days (odds ratios 95% CI 0.37 0.26-0.51) and shorter duration of viral shedding (time to negative PCR: HR 1.27 1.16-1.39). QTc prolongation (>60 ms) was observed in 25 patients (0.67%) leading to the cessation of treatment in 3 cases. No cases of torsade de pointe or sudden death were observed. Conclusion
Early diagnosis, early isolation and early treatment with at least 3 days of HCQ-AZ result in a significantly better clinical outcome and contagiosity in patients with COVID-19 than other treatments.”
In France, doctors who have followed the research of Dr. Raoult, and have themselves witnessed the effectiveness of the HCQ-AZ combination, are suing the government. They demand the right to treat their patients with these drugs before easing of the lockdown. They seek to prevent complications and deaths from a second wave of Covid-19.
Dr. Violaine Guérin, an endocrinologist who conducted a trial on 100 doctors infected with COVID-19, and their families, reported her study findings that demonstrated the effectiveness of prescribing HCQ combined with azithromycin at the first sign of symptoms. The drugs substantially reduced the viral load of Covid-19:
“Taking hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin on the outset of flu symptoms can prevent Covid-19 from getting worse. We can treat people now before they end up on a ventilator.”
Her findings replicated those Dr. Didier Raoult.
Dr. Guérin recommends prescribing hydroxychloroquine for health workers infected by the coronavirus, which is outside of its approved uses. Health unions in France warned that almost 12,000 health care professionals out of 550,000 – roughly a quarter of the country’s health force – were sick with Covid-19. Dr. Guérin recommends its use on compassionate grounds, stating:
“From the very beginning, doctors have been calling for the right to self-prescribe because they are the ones on the frontline of the coronavirus battle. We cannot waste time when we can treat Covid-19 now, as long as this is done in the early stages of the virus and patients are screened for pre-existing medical conditions.”
Soon after this favorable study was published, the Minister of Health Olivier Veran in bald political arm twisting fashion, asked the highest health authority to review its authorization for the use of HCQ to treat Covid, suggesting further restriction.
Read the full article at AHRP.org.
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.
See Also:
Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Book – The Vaccine Court “The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program” ORDER HERE!
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
Order here!
Make a Statement for Health Freedom!
Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children, and even adults.
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact, part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!


healthimpactnews--2020-06-06--The Statistical Insanity over the Media and Government’s Response to Coronavirus

The one thing I love about math are its absolute values to show truth , as opposed to science which @ @ @ @ @ .
See : Mathematical Proof vs. Scientific Proof : Are They the Same ?
This @ @ @ @ @ commentaries and analysis on the current Plandemic I have heard so far .
This is @ @ @ @ @ Rose , but he has a great way of communicating logic and good sense into @ @ @ @ @ media and their fear mongering that is over COVID-19 that is very refreshing !
If @ @ @ @ @ and AWARENESS , then they can control your perceptions , fears and behaviors .

Commentary by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
The one thing I love about math are its absolute values to show truth, as opposed to science which really cannot prove anything. See:
This is one of the best commentaries and analysis on the current Plandemic I have heard so far. This is my first exposure to Larken Rose, but he has a great way of communicating logic and good sense into the phony response by the media and their fear mongering concerning COVID-19 that is very refreshing!
FOCUS and FEAR (Covid-19)
If others can control your FOCUS and AWARENESS, then they can control your perceptions, fears and behaviors.
Larken Rose. June 5, 2020 broadcast.
—————
See Also: