healthimpactnews--2020-09-02--Pregnant Woman in Pajamas Arrested in Own Home in Front of her Children for Facebook Post Planning L

Pregnant Woman in Pajamas Arrested in Own Home in Front of her Children for Facebook Post Planning Lockdown Protest in Australia

A video that at the time of publication of this article has been viewed over 4 million times on Facebook , a 28-year-old pregnant mother still dressed in her pajamas is hand-cuffed and arrested in Australia , because she had allegedly made a Facebook post about a “ freedom day ” event calling for people to peacefully gather against the government ’ s lockdown measures .
The arrest took place in her home , in front of her own children and partner .
Breitbart News broke the story early this morning ( September 2 , 2020 ) in the U.S. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a couple of hours .
In the video , Zoe Buhler from Victoria , Australia , is incredulous that this is happening , as she repeatedly told the police she was pregnant and had an ultrasound appointment in an hour .
She even offers to take down the event post from Facebook .
The masked police were not impressed , as they handcuffed this “ dangerous ” young mother for “ incitement.
” They also produced a search warrant to seize her electronics , including computers and cell phones .
Towards the end @ @ @ @ @ @ @ enters the home in addition to the two policemen , and it is not clear if she is a social worker who had arrived to take the children also , or if she is a third police officer .
We uploaded the video to our Bitchute channel as we suspect this will probably be deleted from Facebook .
Watch the video : This Video Should Disturb All Free People Living Anywhere in the World Right Now This image of masked officers entering the home of an apparently peaceful family who offered no resistance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ called for a peaceful protest over Government ’ s over-reach regarding COVID restrictions , should disturb anyone who still values freedom .
The fact that the event had not even happened yet , that the woman offered to delete it and cancel the event immediately , and yet still was arrested just an hour before she was due for a prenatal check up and was clearly no threat to society , illustrates so clearly that there is an agenda here in place that has nothing to do with health and public safety .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ are clearly the criminals , as well as the judge who signed the arrest warrant , and any health or medical professionals who deemed that a public protest against their edicts was illegal .
This is exactly what the COVID situation has now clearly become around the world : criminals attacking innocent people and destroying their lives .
The original event has been removed from Facebook , but according to Breitbart News Australia ABC news originally quoted some of the text from the Facebook event page : “ As some of you may @ @ @ @ @ @ @ extreme measures and are using scare tactics through the media to prevent the Melbourne protest , ” the now-deleted event description read… “ Here in Ballarat we can be a voice for those in stage four lockdowns .
We can be seen and heard and hopefully make a difference !
” One of the last comments on Zoe Buhler ’ s Facebook Page prior to the arrest reads : Obviously a dangerous criminal that needs to be locked up .
Wake up people !
The true criminals are moving fast now to exert @ @ @ @ @ @ @ future , which includes a COVID vaccine and who knows what else , is going to be far worse than anything we have seen so far .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
A video that at the time of publication of this article has been viewed over 4 million times on Facebook, a 28-year-old pregnant mother still dressed in her pajamas is hand-cuffed and arrested in Australia, because she had allegedly made a Facebook post about a “freedom day” event calling for people to peacefully gather against the government’s lockdown measures.
The arrest took place in her home, in front of her own children and partner.
Breitbart News broke the story early this morning (September 2, 2020) in the U.S., making it their headline story for a couple of hours.
In the video, Zoe Buhler from Victoria, Australia, is incredulous that this is happening, as she repeatedly told the police she was pregnant and had an ultrasound appointment in an hour.
She even offers to take down the event post from Facebook.
The masked police were not impressed, as they handcuffed this “dangerous” young mother for “incitement.” They also produced a search warrant to seize her electronics, including computers and cell phones.
Towards the end of the short video, a woman enters the home in addition to the two policemen, and it is not clear if she is a social worker who had arrived to take the children also, or if she is a third police officer.
We uploaded the video to our Bitchute channel as we suspect this will probably be deleted from Facebook. Watch the video:
This Video Should Disturb All Free People Living Anywhere in the World Right Now
This image of masked officers entering the home of an apparently peaceful family who offered no resistance, simply for posting an event that called for a peaceful protest over Government’s over-reach regarding COVID restrictions, should disturb anyone who still values freedom.
The fact that the event had not even happened yet, that the woman offered to delete it and cancel the event immediately, and yet still was arrested just an hour before she was due for a prenatal check up and was clearly no threat to society, illustrates so clearly that there is an agenda here in place that has nothing to do with health and public safety.
The law enforcement officers in this case are clearly the criminals, as well as the judge who signed the arrest warrant, and any health or medical professionals who deemed that a public protest against their edicts was illegal.
This is exactly what the COVID situation has now clearly become around the world: criminals attacking innocent people and destroying their lives.
The original event has been removed from Facebook, but according to Breitbart News Australia ABC news originally quoted some of the text from the Facebook event page:
“As some of you may have seen the government has gone to extreme measures and are using scare tactics through the media to prevent the Melbourne protest,” the now-deleted event description read… “Here in Ballarat we can be a voice for those in stage four lockdowns. We can be seen and heard and hopefully make a difference!”
One of the last comments on Zoe Buhler’s Facebook Page prior to the arrest reads:
2020 C0R0NA will go down in history as the biggest hoax on earth. Lord help us. Please. Amen.
Obviously a dangerous criminal that needs to be locked up.
Wake up people! The true criminals are moving fast now to exert control because the events planned for the future, which includes a COVID vaccine and who knows what else, is going to be far worse than anything we have seen so far.
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-09-03--Whistleblower Edward Snowden Vindicated as 9th Circuit Rules NSA Spying on Americans’ Phones is Ille

Whistleblower Edward Snowden Vindicated as 9th Circuit Rules NSA Spying on Americans’ Phones is Illegal – Will Trump Pardon Him?

This week the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that the National Security Agency ( NSA ) surveillance program which was exposed by whistleblower Edward Snowden in 2013 is unlawful , and the court even credited Mr. Snowden for exposing it .
Seven years after the National Security Agency ( NSA ) surveillance program was exposed by whistleblower Edward Snowden in 2013 , the operation has been deemed unlawful by a federal court .
The ruling came down Wednesday from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit , which said that the program – which collected mass @ @ @ @ @ @ @ without warrants – violated the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and , potentially , the U.S. Constitution .
“ I never imagined that I would live to see our courts condemn the NSA ’ s activities as unlawful and in the same ruling credit me for exposing them , ” Snowden said about the ruling in a tweet .
“ And yet that day has arrived.
” The former NSA contractor fled to Russia following his actions and has remained there ever since .
Despite this ruling , he still faces espionage charges in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has occasionally floated the idea of a pardon .
( Full article . )
Seven years ago , as the news declared I was being charged as a criminal for speaking the truth , I never imagined that I would live to see our courts condemn the NSA 's activities as unlawful and in the same ruling credit me for exposing them .
And yet that day has arrived .
https : //t.co/FRdG2zUA4U So will President Trump now pardon him ?
President Trump ran on a platform to “ drain the swamp ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ quagmires surrounding the U.S. Intelligence Agencies .
A full pardon to Snowden with a security detail assigned to keep him alive so that he could testify in court , could go a long way to finally seeing some justice in the tyrannical take-over of America which started just post-911 and is now at full speed with the COVID tyrannical power grabs .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
This week the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that the National Security Agency (NSA) surveillance program which was exposed by whistleblower Edward Snowden in 2013 is unlawful, and the court even credited Mr. Snowden for exposing it.
Thomas Kika writing for the International Business Times reports:
Seven years after the National Security Agency (NSA) surveillance program was exposed by whistleblower Edward Snowden in 2013, the operation has been deemed unlawful by a federal court. The ruling came down Wednesday from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which said that the program – which collected mass amounts of phone calls in the U.S. without warrants – violated the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and, potentially, the U.S. Constitution. “I never imagined that I would live to see our courts condemn the NSA’s activities as unlawful and in the same ruling credit me for exposing them,” Snowden said about the ruling in a tweet. “And yet that day has arrived.” The former NSA contractor fled to Russia following his actions and has remained there ever since. Despite this ruling, he still faces espionage charges in the U.S., though President Donald Trump has occasionally floated the idea of a pardon. (Full article.)
Seven years ago, as the news declared I was being charged as a criminal for speaking the truth, I never imagined that I would live to see our courts condemn the NSA's activities as unlawful and in the same ruling credit me for exposing them. And yet that day has arrived. https://t.co/FRdG2zUA4U — Edward Snowden (@Snowden) September 2, 2020
So will President Trump now pardon him? President Trump ran on a platform to “drain the swamp” but has mostly been mired in political quagmires surrounding the U.S. Intelligence Agencies.
A full pardon to Snowden with a security detail assigned to keep him alive so that he could testify in court, could go a long way to finally seeing some justice in the tyrannical take-over of America which started just post-911 and is now at full speed with the COVID tyrannical power grabs.
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-09-03--Dr. Stella Emmanuel Cleared by Texas Medical Board for Complaint while Real Criminal Doctors Still F

Dr. Stella Emmanuel Cleared by Texas Medical Board for Complaint while Real Criminal Doctors Still Free After Murdering Millions

Houston physician Dr. Stella Emmanuel , part of the Frontline Doctors group that went to Washington D.C. last month , posted a copy of a letter she received from the Texas Medical Board to her Twitter account this week showing that the complaint against her had been dismissed .
The complaint was allegedly filed against her because she had a 100 % success rate curing hundreds of COVID patients with hydroxychloroquine ( HCQ ) , a drug with a 65-year safe history that Anthony Fauci , a bureaucrat politician doctor who does not treat patients , claims is ineffective against @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” – Frontline Doctors Storm D.C .
Claiming “ Thousands of Doctors ” are Being Silenced on Facts and Treatments for COVID Frontline Doctor : “ I should let people die because I ’ m scared of Anthony Fauci ?
I should let people die because I ’ m scared of the WHO ?
I ’ m not scared of any of them .
I ’ m not going to let people die.
” The FDA also refuses to allow the drug ’ s use in a wide variety of settings for treating @ @ @ @ @ @ @ alone in her reporting of success in treating COVID patients with HCQ .
Hundreds of doctors around the world are reporting the same thing .
Newsweek : “ Tens of Thousands of Patients with COVID-19 are Dying Unnecessarily ” – by Dr. Harvey A. Risch More Doctors Speak Out on Censorship and Mass Murderer Anthony Fauci ’ s False Information Regarding Hydroxychloroquine Association of American Physicians and Surgeons Sues FDA , HHS over Hydroxychloroquine Censorship Dallas Physician Heals COVID Patients Successfully with non-FDA Approved Hydroxychloroquine After Hospitals Sent them Home with no Treatment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ scandal in the history of the United States .
These doctors are all claiming that no one has to die from COVID because their treatment of using HCQ , zinc , and an antibiotic has a near 100 % success rate in the early stages of the illness .
That makes those in government office handling the COVID response and denying life-saving treatments MASS MURDERERS .
How can they continue to get away with this ?
Editors of The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine : Pharmaceutical Companies are so Financially @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Was a False Hydroxychloroquine Narrative Created to Destroy the Competition for Gilead ’ s Remdesivir ?
Is the 100 % Cure Rate of Hydroxychloroquine a Threat to Fast-Tracking the COVID Vaccines ?
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Houston physician Dr. Stella Emmanuel, part of the Frontline Doctors group that went to Washington D.C. last month, posted a copy of a letter she received from the Texas Medical Board to her Twitter account this week showing that the complaint against her had been dismissed.
The complaint was allegedly filed against her because she had a 100% success rate curing hundreds of COVID patients with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), a drug with a 65-year safe history that Anthony Fauci, a bureaucrat politician doctor who does not treat patients, claims is ineffective against COVID.
See:
The FDA also refuses to allow the drug’s use in a wide variety of settings for treating COVID patients.
Dr. Emmanuel is not alone in her reporting of success in treating COVID patients with HCQ. Hundreds of doctors around the world are reporting the same thing.
See:
This has to be the biggest medical scandal in the history of the United States. These doctors are all claiming that no one has to die from COVID because their treatment of using HCQ, zinc, and an antibiotic has a near 100% success rate in the early stages of the illness.
That makes those in government office handling the COVID response and denying life-saving treatments MASS MURDERERS.
How can they continue to get away with this?
See Also:
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-09-04--Press in His Pocket: Bill Gates Buys Media to Control the Messaging

A Columbia Journalism Review expose reveals that , to control global journalism , Bill Gates has steered over $ 250 million to the BBC , NPR , NBC , Al Jazeera , ProPublica , National Journal , The Guardian , the New York Times , Univision , Medium , the Financial Times , The Atlantic , the Texas Tribune , Gannett , Washington Monthly , Le Monde , Center for Investigative Reporting , Pulitzer Center , National Press Foundation , International Center for Journalists , and a host of other groups .
To conceal his influence , Gates also funneled @ @ @ @ @ @ @ other press outlets .
His press bribes have paid off .
During the pandemic , bought and brain-dead news outlets have treated Bill Gates as a public health expert—despite his lack of medical training or regulatory experience .
Gates also funds an army of independent fact checkers including the Poynter Institute and Gannett —which use their fact-checking platforms to “ silence detractors ” and to “ debunk ” as “ false conspiracy theories ” and “ misinformation , ” charges that Gates has championed and invested in biometric chips , vaccine identification systems @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Gates ’ s media gifts , says CJR author Tim Schwab , mean that “ critical reporting about the Gates Foundation is rare.
” The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation declined multiple interview requests from CJR and refused to disclose how much money it has funneled to journalists .
In 2007 , the LA Times published one of the only critical investigations on the Gates Foundation , exposing Gates ’ s holdings in companies that hurt people his foundation claims to help , like industries linked to child labor .
Lead reporter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were unwilling to answer questions and pretty much refused to respond in any sort of way… ” The investigation showed how Gates ’ s global health funding has steered the world ’ s aid agenda toward Gates ’ personal goals ( vaccines and GMO crops ) and away from issues such as emergency preparedness to respond to disease outbreaks , like the Ebola crisis .
“ They ’ ve dodged our questions and sought to undermine our coverage , ” says freelance journalist Alex Park after investigating the Gates Foundation ’ s polio @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s Health Defense , Inc .
This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children ’ s Health Defense , Inc. Want to learn more from Children ’ s Health Defense ?
Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy , Jr. and the Children ’ s Health Defense .
Your donation will help to support us in our efforts .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
Children’s Health Defense
A Columbia Journalism Review expose reveals that, to control global journalism, Bill Gates has steered over $250 million to the BBC, NPR, NBC, Al Jazeera, ProPublica, National Journal, The Guardian, the New York Times, Univision, Medium, the Financial Times, The Atlantic, the Texas Tribune, Gannett, Washington Monthly, Le Monde, Center for Investigative Reporting, Pulitzer Center, National Press Foundation, International Center for Journalists, and a host of other groups. To conceal his influence, Gates also funneled unknown sums via subgrants for contracts to other press outlets.
His press bribes have paid off. During the pandemic, bought and brain-dead news outlets have treated Bill Gates as a public health expert—despite his lack of medical training or regulatory experience.
Gates also funds an army of independent fact checkers including the Poynter Institute and Gannett —which use their fact-checking platforms to “silence detractors” and to “debunk” as “false conspiracy theories” and “misinformation,” charges that Gates has championed and invested in biometric chips, vaccine identification systems, satellite surveillance, and COVID vaccines.
Gates’s media gifts, says CJR author Tim Schwab, mean that “critical reporting about the Gates Foundation is rare.” The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation declined multiple interview requests from CJR and refused to disclose how much money it has funneled to journalists.
In 2007, the LA Times published one of the only critical investigations on the Gates Foundation, exposing Gates’s holdings in companies that hurt people his foundation claims to help, like industries linked to child labor. Lead reporter Charles Piller, says, “They were unwilling to answer questions and pretty much refused to respond in any sort of way…”
The investigation showed how Gates’s global health funding has steered the world’s aid agenda toward Gates’ personal goals (vaccines and GMO crops) and away from issues such as emergency preparedness to respond to disease outbreaks, like the Ebola crisis.
“They’ve dodged our questions and sought to undermine our coverage,” says freelance journalist Alex Park after investigating the Gates Foundation’s polio vaccine efforts.
Read the full article at Children’s Health Defense
© 2020 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-09-04--The CDC Expands its Overreach and is Now America’s New Landlord Threatening Rental Markets

THE CDC IS AMERICA ’ S NEW LANDLORD This is astonishing , even by 2020 standards .
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , operating under the US Department of Health and Human Services , has asserted jurisdiction over private residential leases nationwide .
It intends to curtail evictions until at least the end of the year , and in fact its new directive threatens federal criminal penalties against landlords who ignore tenant “ declarations ” made using CDC forms .
It is unclear , to put it mildly , exactly how this jurisdiction over private contracts and state/local @ @ @ @ @ @ @ less an administrative agency acting on its own .
One federal official justifies the bizarre and legally dubious action based on the CDC ’ s broad charter to stop the spread of communicable diseases—a charter at which they ’ ve failed miserably with covid : Congress has delegated broad authority to HHS , the Surgeon General and CDC , to take reasonable efforts to combat the spread of communicable diseases , and frankly I think it makes sense for those authorities abroad because we don ’ t know for any given situation or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stop the spread .
I think , in this particular order , the CDC has made a very compelling case that it is quite problematic at this particular time .
It ’ s focused on this particular pandemic , which is obviously the uniquely powerful grasp in the nation ’ s entire history in terms of the effect it ’ s had that for a bunch of reasons in particular , that the home has been sort of the focal point of people social distancing and building , sort of a safe space @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and also the fact that if people get kicked out , they may end up in overcrowded congregated living facilities or homeless shelters , and that is a potential recipe for a big spread of COVID-19 .
Thanks to the oft-criticized but in fact essential Zero Hedge for the nice bit of early and original reporting here—a full day before NPR , Bloomberg , et al.—and for details from a phone conference with CDC officials .
Again , this was announced without congressional input or approval and purely by administrative decree .
At @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the CARES Act , passed by Congress in March , were enacted by politicians who face voters this fall .
And while those earlier moratoriums may well be constitutionally suspect too , at least in times of sanity , they were limited to federally backed rentals and mortgages .
The CDC ’ s new action is much broader , applying conceivably to all private residential leases across the country .
The fallout from suspending rental contracts will be deep and long lasting .
Many landlords will find their situations untenable and stop making @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rental housing stock will be depressed , as owners worry about the next suspension of rent payments now that the precedent has been set .
After all , why wouldn ’ t moratoriums happen again when the next pandemic or financial crisis hits ?
Rental housing units will drop in price as more landlords abandon the business—setting the stage for commercial and private equity buyers to grab units on the cheap from individuals and small owners .
Ultimately , foreclosures , evictions , and tax sales will happen no matter what the federal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ bigger players owning more and more of the rental housing stock , consolidating the permanent renter class and adding to the rootlessness many Americans feel .
Even the most modest home ownership creates skin in the game and encourages better neighborhoods , while areas dominated by rentals lack the same incentives for improvement .
And the new owners of rental units will pass all the uncertainty , risks , and potential losses on to millions of Americans in the form of higher rents .
Even during the most turbulent periods in American history @ @ @ @ @ @ @ War II , and an 1880s tuberculosis outbreak which killed one in seven people , virtually no one expected the federal government to suspend rent .
This action by the CDC , in response to a very manageable and retreating cold virus , is the kind of quietly unprecedented development we ’ ve come to expect this year .
This is a watershed moment for the US : when you destroy trust in contract enforcement you create terrible ripple effects throughout society .
Something this radical should not be rushed into place with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ amounts to buying votes in a national election .
But of course in a managerial state we should expect just this type of shortsighted political consideration to prevail over good sense and justice .
The CDC wants to effectively vitiate contracts : when you tell one party that it need not perform and the other that it can not sue for nonperformance , you radically alter the bargaining power of those parties .
The contract they signed becomes nothing more than an aspirational document , a legislative ( or administrative ! )
tool @ @ @ @ @ @ @ politicians .
The effects of this moratorium undoubtedly will spill over in unforeseen ways as Americans get used to the idea that their financial obligations can be erased by state edict .
The tremendous costs will be borne by all of us , because when contracts are not enforceable every transaction must account for much higher risks .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

THE CDC IS AMERICA’S NEW LANDLORD
by Jeff Deist
Mises Institute
This is astonishing, even by 2020 standards.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, operating under the US Department of Health and Human Services, has asserted jurisdiction over private residential leases nationwide. It intends to curtail evictions until at least the end of the year, and in fact its new directive threatens federal criminal penalties against landlords who ignore tenant “declarations” made using CDC forms.
It is unclear, to put it mildly, exactly how this jurisdiction over private contracts and state/local courts flows even to Congress, much less an administrative agency acting on its own.
One federal official justifies the bizarre and legally dubious action based on the CDC’s broad charter to stop the spread of communicable diseases—a charter at which they’ve failed miserably with covid:
Congress has delegated broad authority to HHS, the Surgeon General and CDC, to take reasonable efforts to combat the spread of communicable diseases, and frankly I think it makes sense for those authorities abroad because we don’t know for any given situation or scenario what steps will be needed to stop the spread. I think, in this particular order, the CDC has made a very compelling case that it is quite problematic at this particular time. It’s focused on this particular pandemic, which is obviously the uniquely powerful grasp in the nation’s entire history in terms of the effect it’s had that for a bunch of reasons in particular, that the home has been sort of the focal point of people social distancing and building, sort of a safe space themselves over the past few months, and also the fact that if people get kicked out, they may end up in overcrowded congregated living facilities or homeless shelters, and that is a potential recipe for a big spread of COVID-19.
Thanks to the oft-criticized but in fact essential Zero Hedge for the nice bit of early and original reporting here—a full day before NPR, Bloomberg, et al.—and for details from a phone conference with CDC officials.
Again, this was announced without congressional input or approval and purely by administrative decree.
At least the eviction and mortgage moratoriums in the CARES Act, passed by Congress in March, were enacted by politicians who face voters this fall. And while those earlier moratoriums may well be constitutionally suspect too, at least in times of sanity, they were limited to federally backed rentals and mortgages.
The CDC’s new action is much broader, applying conceivably to all private residential leases across the country.
The fallout from suspending rental contracts will be deep and long lasting. Many landlords will find their situations untenable and stop making mortgage and property tax payments.
New rental housing stock will be depressed, as owners worry about the next suspension of rent payments now that the precedent has been set.
After all, why wouldn’t moratoriums happen again when the next pandemic or financial crisis hits? Rental housing units will drop in price as more landlords abandon the business—setting the stage for commercial and private equity buyers to grab units on the cheap from individuals and small owners.
Ultimately, foreclosures, evictions, and tax sales will happen no matter what the federal government does. The likely outcome is bigger players owning more and more of the rental housing stock, consolidating the permanent renter class and adding to the rootlessness many Americans feel.
Even the most modest home ownership creates skin in the game and encourages better neighborhoods, while areas dominated by rentals lack the same incentives for improvement. And the new owners of rental units will pass all the uncertainty, risks, and potential losses on to millions of Americans in the form of higher rents.
Even during the most turbulent periods in American history, including the Great Depression, World War II, and an 1880s tuberculosis outbreak which killed one in seven people, virtually no one expected the federal government to suspend rent.
This action by the CDC, in response to a very manageable and retreating cold virus, is the kind of quietly unprecedented development we’ve come to expect this year.
Watershed Moment in U.S. History
This is a watershed moment for the US: when you destroy trust in contract enforcement you create terrible ripple effects throughout society.
Something this radical should not be rushed into place with such little forethought, especially when it amounts to buying votes in a national election. But of course in a managerial state we should expect just this type of shortsighted political consideration to prevail over good sense and justice.
The CDC wants to effectively vitiate contracts: when you tell one party that it need not perform and the other that it cannot sue for nonperformance, you radically alter the bargaining power of those parties.
The contract they signed becomes nothing more than an aspirational document, a legislative (or administrative!) tool to be rewritten at the will of politicians.
The effects of this moratorium undoubtedly will spill over in unforeseen ways as Americans get used to the idea that their financial obligations can be erased by state edict.
The tremendous costs will be borne by all of us, because when contracts are not enforceable every transaction must account for much higher risks.
Read the full article at Mises.org.
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-09-06--Washington Couple Harassed Over Medical Marijuana Use – Children Kidnapped and Allegedly Scheduled f

Washington Couple Harassed Over Medical Marijuana Use – Children Kidnapped and Allegedly Scheduled for Adoption

For the last two years , 22-year-old Sophia Rosas , and her 23-year-old fiancé , Sean Kilkenny , have been living a nightmare in Bremerton , Washington .
Like so many other families in this country , Sophia and Sean have been subjected to the corruption of Child Protection Services .
Between assessments and services that never get done because social workers fail to schedule them correctly or won ’ t accept them , and unending demands for such services , the delay tactics of corruption are full blown in this family ’ s case .
The epitome of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Nancy Schaefer and former CPS investigator , Carlos Morales , and it is clear to anyone looking at the case with an experienced eye that the full intention of Kitsap County Department of Children , Youth and Families ( DCYF ) is to push an adoption train to the end goal .
Adoption incentives provide bonuses , stipends , and a pretty paycheck for the State at the end of the year .
What started as a freak accident for 2-year-old Zurius , during a fun activity with his mom ’ s fiancé @ @ @ @ @ @ @ parents ’ worst nightmare .
Almost two years of jumping through fiery hoops of unnecessary assessments and services , on the threat of losing forever the most precious treasure in their world – their children – Sophia and Sean have finally had enough .
They can see the track they are on currently will only lead to adoption of both children , and these young parents are now desperate for help to save their family .
On November 25th , 2018 , Zurius was taken to Silverdale Harrison Hospital in Bremerton , Washington @ @ @ @ @ @ @ arm .
Not yet knowing the exact cause of her son ’ s injury , and with Sean at work , Sophia attempted to explain to hospital staff that it may have occurred while he was potty training on the toilet , as that is where he first started complaining about the pain the night before .
Sean had frantically ran out from the bathroom that night , where he was helping Zurius learn to potty train , because Zurius was upset about his arm and wouldn ’ t calm down .
Sophia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ back to bed , intent on taking him to the doctor in the morning .
When she awoke in the morning , Zurius ’ arm was swollen and purple , so she immediately took him to the hospital .
It wasn ’ t until after hospital staff placed an emergency hold on Zurius , because the description of events did not match the break so there was concern of child abuse , and made Sophia leave the hospital without her son , that Sophia and Sean realized that the fracture probably occurred when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the air and caught by Sean , an activity that many parents do with their small children .
Social workers interviewed Sophia a couple days later , where she attempted to tell them what they now believed happened to Zurius .
The social workers took this as the story changing and Sophia not being truthful , which led Sophia into a dependency case with the local Department of Children , Youth , and Families ( DCYF ) office .
Sophia was “ founded ” by the Department to have failed to protect @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” of child abuse .
Neither parent was charged with any crime , neither was given a trial to determine the truth of the matter , and neither were aware of their option to appeal the Department ’ s decisions .
Instead , Sophia ended up in the Kitsap County Juvenile Court , where a shelter care hearing that was supposed to be completed ( per Washington State Law ) within 72 hours , was extended again and again , finally resuming more than a month later .
During this time , Sophia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into signing a safety plan and completing assessments for the department , while her son was placed with his maternal aunt while in State custody .
As Sean is not the biological father of Zurius , he was not involved in these proceedings or safety plan .
Once Sophia finally agreed to the dependency , believing , like so many others , she had no other options to get her son home other than comply , life went on – as Sophia struggled to balance her medical conditions and demands of the department @ @ @ @ @ @ @ son .
Almost a year later , on November 21 , 2019 , Sophia and Sean were blessed with the birth of Baby Riley .
Zurius was still living with his maternal aunt , and the permanency plan of the court was still Return Home .
Sophia was still attempting to complete the required services from the department , but she says that every time she completed something it was like “ another hoop went up in the air for her to jump through.
” After Riley was born , the social worker @ @ @ @ @ @ @ time , Tina Whitney , placed Riley on an emergency hold , pending a dependency petition against both parents .
Like a tragic deja vu from the previous year , Sophia and Sean were escorted from the hospital once again , without their baby .
The only reason for the removal was because of the open CPS case with Zurius .
After another round of extended shelter care hearings , and coercement by attorneys , both parents finally agreed to a dependency and more assessments and services .
During this time , Zurius @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s home and placed in foster care with strangers , a foster home that is also believed to be a potential adoptive home .
Both parents were doing good in regards to services when COVID-19 happened in March 2020 , and everything in Washington State shut down , preventing them from continuing any of the required services or assessments .
At the next review hearing , the department and court acknowledged that both parents would be in compliance with their services and safety plan if the state had not shut down because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , Sophia ’ s public defender filed a motion for Riley to be returned to their care .
Despite the department ’ s objections , Commissioner Matthew Clucas approved the order and Riley returned home on July 16th , 2020 , stating that “ the court finds the reason for removal no longer exists.
” Not even a month later , their current social worker , Joni McDairmant , and the department filed another petition to remove Riley from the home – this time based solely on Sophia and Sean ’ s medical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ written into Washington State ’ s 22-year-old medical marijuana law .
Both parents are Medical Marijuana patients , who have utilized Washington ’ s recreational Marijuana programs to gain access to their medicine .
Sophia , having received her $ 200 medical marijuana recommendation recently , suffers from pain caused by having her gallbladder removed , and constant digestive tract inflammation that results in nausea and vomiting .
In extreme cases like Sophia ’ s , this condition also results in occasional malnourishment – because her internal organs are webbed together with scar @ @ @ @ @ @ @ around the age of 8 years old ) .
Sean suffers from fusion of his lower backbone and degenerative disc disease , and has , like many patients across the state , continued to utilize Washington ’ s legal recreational program to obtain his medicine as he can not afford the $ 200 medical recommendation .
The resulting order was entered in violation of State statute ( RCW 69.51A.120 ) , against Sophia ’ s medical rights , and without testimony on her behalf by a licensed medical professional .
Commissioner Clucas did @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but said he was hesitant in denying the Department ’ s motion .
He then ordered that both parents refrain from using marijuana completely , despite it being legal in Washington state , and despite a legitimate Medical Marijuana recommendation from Sophia ’ s physician .
He ordered this compliance on threat of again removing Riley from the home .
An order that gave vague authority to the Department , or the assigned Guardian ad Litem , in removing Riley from the home at their discretion .
According to Washington DCYF , Sean @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Moderate Cannabis Dependence Disorder ” and require abstinence and in depth drug treatment , despite their use being for medical purposes .
They ’ ve taken several chemical dependency assessments through State contracted providers , that all “ confirm ” this diagnosis .
Both parents have submitted to numerous urine analysis tests and have attempted to engage in Chemical Dependency services since COVID shut downs happened last March , despite their disagreement with the diagnosis , even being told that their use of marijuana was fine “ as long as their levels stay @ @ @ @ @ @ @ happening , Washington DCYF also motioned for Termination of Parental Rights for Sophia and Zurius ’ biological father , and changed the permanency plan for Zurius to “ adoption within 6 months.
” A TPR hearing is scheduled for October 13th , 2020 .
Sophia doesn ’ t understand why , despite her compliance with the department , they are now attempting to adopt out her son .
She says Then , on the afternoon of September 4th , everything changed again .
The social worker , Joni McDairmant , was supposed to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Sean and his mother , Jennifer , were going to take Riley downstairs to meet her for the visit , since Sophia was recently tested for COVID-19 after possible exposure from their neighbor .
After waiting almost an hour , Sophia texted Joni and told her that they had errands to run .
Joni texted back and said Riley was not to go anywhere or she would call the police .
Sophia told her okay and waited for her to show up .
Within the hour , police showed up , followed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and CPS investigator , Gregory Fontenette .
Using Commissioner Clucas ’ vague order , and a failed UA from only a week after the order was given , Joni and Gregory removed Riley from his parent ’ s care and took him to foster care – despite his previous placement ( a family friend ) being present and willing to take him .
Jennifer and Sophia filmed the abduction with their phones .
Riley is now placed with strangers in foster care , despite being possibly exposed to COVID19 , putting whatever foster @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of potentially contracting the virus as well .
The social workers didn ’ t even allow time to pack a bag or say goodbye .
Sophia is distraught that her baby won ’ t even have his peter rabbit for bedtime , a stuffie he has slept with every night since he has been home .
Sophia and Sean are desperate to get both of their boys home again .
Serra Frank , a family advocate from Fight for Lilly , has reviewed the paperwork and is now working with the family .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ many others that have looked at the case , that reunification with the family has never been the goal of the Kitsap County Washington Department of Children , Youth and Families .
She has now filed to discharge the public defender that was obviously not adequately speaking for her in court , and is ready to fight them head on .
Sophia has also filed for a revision of Commissioner Clucas ’ ruling regarding her medical marijuana use , to be heard by Kitsap County Superior Court on September 16th , 2020 .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ in front of Commissioner Clucas on September 9th , 2020 , at 9am PST .
This hearing is to review their compliance with the order that mandates they quit using medical marijuana , and will likely be a new shelter care hearing for baby Riley .
Sophia is asking Commissioner Clucas to stay his order , pending revision , and will be requesting the immediate return home of her son .
She believes that as a legal medical marijuana patient in Washington State , she shouldn ’ t have to choose between her @ @ @ @ @ @ @ YOU CAN HELP Comment on this article at MedicalKidnap.com .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed Medical Kidnapping : A Threat to Every Family in America T-Shirt See : Medical Kidnapping : A Threat to Every Family in America Today Help spread the awareness of Medical Kidnapping by wearing the Medical Kidnapping t-shirt !
Support the cause of MedicalKidnap.com , which is part of the Health Impact News network .
Support the cause against Medical Kidnapping by purchasing our new book @ @ @ @ @ @ @ skeptical and can not believe that medical kidnapping happens in the U.S. today , this is the book for them !
Backed with solid references and real life examples , they will not be able to deny the plain evidence before them , and will become better educated on this topic that is destroying the American family .
2 Books Retail : $ 49.98 ( for 2 books ) FREE Shipping Available !
Now : $ 19.99 ( for 2 books ) Order here !

by Health Impact News/MedicalKidnap.com Staff
For the last two years, 22-year-old Sophia Rosas, and her 23-year-old fiancé, Sean Kilkenny, have been living a nightmare in Bremerton, Washington.
Like so many other families in this country, Sophia and Sean have been subjected to the corruption of Child Protection Services. Between assessments and services that never get done because social workers fail to schedule them correctly or won’t accept them, and unending demands for such services, the delay tactics of corruption are full blown in this family’s case.
The epitome of the warnings were shouted from people like Senator Nancy Schaefer and former CPS investigator, Carlos Morales, and it is clear to anyone looking at the case with an experienced eye that the full intention of Kitsap County Department of Children, Youth and Families (DCYF) is to push an adoption train to the end goal.
Adoption incentives provide bonuses, stipends, and a pretty paycheck for the State at the end of the year.
What started as a freak accident for 2-year-old Zurius, during a fun activity with his mom’s fiancé, Sean, has turned into these parents’ worst nightmare.
Almost two years of jumping through fiery hoops of unnecessary assessments and services, on the threat of losing forever the most precious treasure in their world – their children – Sophia and Sean have finally had enough.
They can see the track they are on currently will only lead to adoption of both children, and these young parents are now desperate for help to save their family.
On November 25th, 2018, Zurius was taken to Silverdale Harrison Hospital in Bremerton, Washington, for a spiral fracture of his arm.
Not yet knowing the exact cause of her son’s injury, and with Sean at work, Sophia attempted to explain to hospital staff that it may have occurred while he was potty training on the toilet, as that is where he first started complaining about the pain the night before.
Sean had frantically ran out from the bathroom that night, where he was helping Zurius learn to potty train, because Zurius was upset about his arm and wouldn’t calm down. Sophia had given him ibuprofen and put him back to bed, intent on taking him to the doctor in the morning.
When she awoke in the morning, Zurius’ arm was swollen and purple, so she immediately took him to the hospital. It wasn’t until after hospital staff placed an emergency hold on Zurius, because the description of events did not match the break so there was concern of child abuse, and made Sophia leave the hospital without her son, that Sophia and Sean realized that the fracture probably occurred when he had landed wrong after being thrown in the air and caught by Sean, an activity that many parents do with their small children.
Social workers interviewed Sophia a couple days later, where she attempted to tell them what they now believed happened to Zurius. The social workers took this as the story changing and Sophia not being truthful, which led Sophia into a dependency case with the local Department of Children, Youth, and Families (DCYF) office.
Sophia was “founded” by the Department to have failed to protect Zurius, and Sean was “founded” of child abuse. Neither parent was charged with any crime, neither was given a trial to determine the truth of the matter, and neither were aware of their option to appeal the Department’s decisions.
Instead, Sophia ended up in the Kitsap County Juvenile Court, where a shelter care hearing that was supposed to be completed (per Washington State Law) within 72 hours, was extended again and again, finally resuming more than a month later.
During this time, Sophia was repeatedly coerced by a public defender into signing a safety plan and completing assessments for the department, while her son was placed with his maternal aunt while in State custody. As Sean is not the biological father of Zurius, he was not involved in these proceedings or safety plan.
Once Sophia finally agreed to the dependency, believing, like so many others, she had no other options to get her son home other than comply, life went on – as Sophia struggled to balance her medical conditions and demands of the department, with only weekly visitations with her son.
Almost a year later, on November 21, 2019, Sophia and Sean were blessed with the birth of Baby Riley.
Zurius was still living with his maternal aunt, and the permanency plan of the court was still Return Home. Sophia was still attempting to complete the required services from the department, but she says that every time she completed something it was like “another hoop went up in the air for her to jump through.”
After Riley was born, the social worker in charge of the case at the time, Tina Whitney, placed Riley on an emergency hold, pending a dependency petition against both parents. Like a tragic deja vu from the previous year, Sophia and Sean were escorted from the hospital once again, without their baby.
The only reason for the removal was because of the open CPS case with Zurius.
After another round of extended shelter care hearings, and coercement by attorneys, both parents finally agreed to a dependency and more assessments and services.
During this time, Zurius was also removed from the maternal Aunt’s home and placed in foster care with strangers, a foster home that is also believed to be a potential adoptive home.
Both parents were doing good in regards to services when COVID-19 happened in March 2020, and everything in Washington State shut down, preventing them from continuing any of the required services or assessments.
At the next review hearing, the department and court acknowledged that both parents would be in compliance with their services and safety plan if the state had not shut down because of the virus.
In May 2020, Sophia’s public defender filed a motion for Riley to be returned to their care. Despite the department’s objections, Commissioner Matthew Clucas approved the order and Riley returned home on July 16th, 2020, stating that “the court finds the reason for removal no longer exists.”
Not even a month later, their current social worker, Joni McDairmant, and the department filed another petition to remove Riley from the home – this time based solely on Sophia and Sean’s medical marijuana use and despite a parental protection written into Washington State’s 22-year-old medical marijuana law.
Both parents are Medical Marijuana patients, who have utilized Washington’s recreational Marijuana programs to gain access to their medicine.
Sophia, having received her $200 medical marijuana recommendation recently, suffers from pain caused by having her gallbladder removed, and constant digestive tract inflammation that results in nausea and vomiting.
In extreme cases like Sophia’s, this condition also results in occasional malnourishment – because her internal organs are webbed together with scar tissue from years of inflammation (beginning around the age of 8 years old).
Sean suffers from fusion of his lower backbone and degenerative disc disease, and has, like many patients across the state, continued to utilize Washington’s legal recreational program to obtain his medicine as he cannot afford the $200 medical recommendation.
A hearing was held August 26th, 2020, with Commissioner Matthew Clucas presiding.
The resulting order was entered in violation of State statute (RCW 69.51A.120), against Sophia’s medical rights, and without testimony on her behalf by a licensed medical professional.
Commissioner Clucas did not remove Riley from the home, but said he was hesitant in denying the Department’s motion. He then ordered that both parents refrain from using marijuana completely, despite it being legal in Washington state, and despite a legitimate Medical Marijuana recommendation from Sophia’s physician. He ordered this compliance on threat of again removing Riley from the home.
An order that gave vague authority to the Department, or the assigned Guardian ad Litem, in removing Riley from the home at their discretion.
According to Washington DCYF, Sean and Sophia suffer from “Mild or Moderate Cannabis Dependence Disorder” and require abstinence and in depth drug treatment, despite their use being for medical purposes. They’ve taken several chemical dependency assessments through State contracted providers, that all “confirm” this diagnosis.
Both parents have submitted to numerous urine analysis tests and have attempted to engage in Chemical Dependency services since COVID shut downs happened last March, despite their disagreement with the diagnosis, even being told that their use of marijuana was fine “as long as their levels stay low.”
While all of this was happening, Washington DCYF also motioned for Termination of Parental Rights for Sophia and Zurius’ biological father, and changed the permanency plan for Zurius to “adoption within 6 months.” A TPR hearing is scheduled for October 13th, 2020.
Sophia doesn’t understand why, despite her compliance with the department, they are now attempting to adopt out her son. She says
“I am scared for my children. I’m scared for their mental health because of all this. Especially my firstborn. If I feel out of control, helpless, and hopeless, I can only imagine how they feel.”
Then, on the afternoon of September 4th, everything changed again. The social worker, Joni McDairmant, was supposed to arrive at 1pm to check on Riley. Sean and his mother, Jennifer, were going to take Riley downstairs to meet her for the visit, since Sophia was recently tested for COVID-19 after possible exposure from their neighbor.
After waiting almost an hour, Sophia texted Joni and told her that they had errands to run. Joni texted back and said Riley was not to go anywhere or she would call the police. Sophia told her okay and waited for her to show up.
Within the hour, police showed up, followed by the social workers, Joni McDairmant and CPS investigator, Gregory Fontenette.
Using Commissioner Clucas’ vague order, and a failed UA from only a week after the order was given, Joni and Gregory removed Riley from his parent’s care and took him to foster care – despite his previous placement (a family friend) being present and willing to take him.
Jennifer and Sophia filmed the abduction with their phones.
Riley is now placed with strangers in foster care, despite being possibly exposed to COVID19, putting whatever foster home he was placed in at risk of potentially contracting the virus as well. The social workers didn’t even allow time to pack a bag or say goodbye. Sophia is distraught that her baby won’t even have his peter rabbit for bedtime, a stuffie he has slept with every night since he has been home.
Sophia and Sean are desperate to get both of their boys home again.
Serra Frank, a family advocate from Fight for Lilly, has reviewed the paperwork and is now working with the family. It is obvious to her, and many others that have looked at the case, that reunification with the family has never been the goal of the Kitsap County Washington Department of Children, Youth and Families.
Serra says,
I have never seen such an blatant case of forced adoption in my 7 years of being a family advocate. This young family was obviously targeted because of their age, their economic status, and their beautiful blonde-haired and blue-eyed babies – that any parent in the world would want to adopt. It wouldn’t matter if the parents completed a million services successfully. Adoption of both children is apparently the only goal of this department.
Sopha says,
I didn’t understand why Kitsap County was nicknamed Kidnap County, until I had kids.
She has now filed to discharge the public defender that was obviously not adequately speaking for her in court, and is ready to fight them head on. Sophia has also filed for a revision of Commissioner Clucas’ ruling regarding her medical marijuana use, to be heard by Kitsap County Superior Court on September 16th, 2020.
She says,
Ever since I took over and started fighting back, I feel empowered and more hopeful. I feel better prepared to say the least. I feel like Super Mom. I will save my babies.
Both parents are scheduled to appear again in front of Commissioner Clucas on September 9th, 2020, at 9am PST. This hearing is to review their compliance with the order that mandates they quit using medical marijuana, and will likely be a new shelter care hearing for baby Riley.
Sophia is asking Commissioner Clucas to stay his order, pending revision, and will be requesting the immediate return home of her son.
She believes that as a legal medical marijuana patient in Washington State, she shouldn’t have to choose between her life-saving medicine and her babies.
HOW YOU CAN HELP
Family Facebook Support Page – www.facebook.com/Fight4ZandRiley
#Fight4ZandRiley
Change.org petition: https://www.change.org/p/washington-dcyf-stop-medical-kidnapping-in-kitsap-county
Contact:
Washington Governor Jay Inslee: https://www.governor.wa.gov/contact/contact/send-gov-inslee-e-message
Office of the Governor
PO Box 40002
Olympia, WA 98504-0002
Phone: 360-902-4111
Bremerton Mayor Greg Wheeler
345 6th Street Suite 600
Bremerton, WA 98337
Phone: 360-473-5266
Washington Legislators:
Representative Dan Griffey: https://app.leg.wa.gov/pbc/memberEmail/35/1
PO Box 40600
Olympia, WA 98504
(360) 786 – 7966
Senator Tim Sheldon: https://app.leg.wa.gov/pbc/memberEmail/35/0
PO Box 40435
Olympia, WA 98504
(360) 786 – 7668
Fax: (360) 786 – 1999
Senator Patty Murray: https://www.murray.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/mobile/contactme
Senator Maria Cantwell: https://www.cantwell.senate.gov/contact
Representative Derek Kilmer: https://kilmer.house.gov/contact/email-me
Comment on this article at MedicalKidnap.com.
See Also:
Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through
Medical Kidnapping: A Threat to Every Family in America T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton!
Order here!
Medical Kidnapping is REAL!
See: Medical Kidnapping: A Threat to Every Family in America Today
Help spread the awareness of Medical Kidnapping by wearing the Medical Kidnapping t-shirt!
Support the cause of MedicalKidnap.com, which is part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!
Support the cause against Medical Kidnapping by purchasing our new book!
If you know people who are skeptical and cannot believe that medical kidnapping happens in the U.S. today, this is the book for them! Backed with solid references and real life examples, they will not be able to deny the plain evidence before them, and will become better educated on this topic that is destroying the American family.
1 Book – 228 pages
Retail: $24.99
FREE Shipping Available!
Now: $14.99
Order here!
2 Books
Retail: $49.98 (for 2 books)
FREE Shipping Available!
Now: $19.99 (for 2 books)
Order here!


healthimpactnews--2020-09-06--The Water Fluoridation Disinformation War

In the satirical black comedy film Dr. Strangelove there is the iconic scene when the rogue general Jack D Ripper , played by Sterling Hayden , tells Peter Sellers character , From that day until now , the entire pharmaceutical industry , public health officials and the mainstream media have assumed that fluoride is absolutely safe , and anyone who dares to criticize water fluoridation and its dental use is a loon or conspiracy theorist who threatens national health .
Yet , as with so many medical and health challenges we face , the dominant consensus is wrong .
The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ advocacy is substantial and continues to grow .
In fact , throughout the US and other nations , concerned citizens , consumer activists and whistleblowers are putting pressure on state and local governments and public utilities to cease and desist in spiking our drinking water with fluoride .
Recently , the pushback against decades of lies , misinformation and media propaganda to seduce into accepting corporate and government sponsored junk research supporting fluoridation is reaching a tipping point towards public safety .
Earlier this year , an alliance of public health organizations and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Protection Agency in a federal court trial to bring an end to fluoridation once and for all .
In a more recent ruling the judge has permitted the suit , represented by two distinguished attorneys – Robert F Kennedy Jr and Michel Connett — to continue given “ the merits in light of the substantial scientific evidence proffered at trial.
” And earlier this past August , researchers at Mount Sinai School of Medicine announced their findings that low-level chronic exposure to fluoride in drinking water induces adverse changes in kidney and liver @ @ @ @ @ @ @ against fluoride continues to pile up .
The CDC ’ s and EPA ’ s farce has earned a powerful voice .
Wikipedia is a staunch defender of water fluoridation and promoter of this toxic propaganda .
Parroting the statements of arch-Skeptic Stephen Barrett , Wikipedia ’ s editors sacrifice reams of scientific data to push the scientifically-debunked theories of those who would put this proven neurotoxin into every reservoir and public water utility thereby exposing generation after generation to a drug whose harms are well established yet still vehemently suppressed .
Wikipedia @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fluoride merely states that it is “ used to prevent cavities ” and that it is the 215th most prescribed medication in the US .
This benevolent description is posted without any context and stated as a matter-of-fact commandment that orally-consumed fluoride has no proven effect on dental health aside from causing dental fluorosis , an unsightly mottling of the teeth .
Studies that suggest this can be a sign of fluoride-induced brain damage are ignored .
Also missing are the scientific warnings about fluoride ’ s detrimental effects on nearly every system @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been repeatedly studied and confirmed .
Under the heading “ Dental Caries , ” Wikipedia repeats the faulty wisdom about how fluoride is supposed to work to enhance the formation of fluorapatite , a component of tooth enamel .
It does not mention that studies have shown that this fluorapatite layer is just six nanometers thick , less than 1/10000th the width of a strand of hair and therefore unlikely to have much of an impact strengthening or re-mineralizing teeth .
To its credit , Wikipedia does admit – without explaining the implications @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the US for fluoridating water .
Instead , hexafluorosilicic acid and sodium hexafluorosilicate , toxic byproducts of phosphate fertilizer and aluminum manufacturing , are used .
Wikipedia does not discuss the industrial origins of these compounds ( called silicofluorides or SiFs ) nor their toxicity – both are deemed industrial pollutants if released into the air via factory smokestacks or into the environment via drainpipes .
Yet when deliberately added to drinking water they are classified as benevolent .
Nor does Wikipedia mention that these fluoride compounds have never been approved or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Nor are we informed that studies have shown that SiFs can double or even triple the rate of lead uptake into children ’ s bloodstreams by only citing a single study to discredit this “ hypothesis.
” Adding SiFs to drinking water lowers its pH , rendering it more corrosive and thus more likely to leach lead and other contaminants as it flows through pipes .
But even when a neutralizing agent is added , SiFs ’ “ unique affinity for lead ” leach even tiny amounts of the metal from any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ water flows .
Used in combination with chlorine and chloramine , common disinfectants added to drinking water , the rate of lead uptake from SiF-treated water is off the charts .
SiFs and lead have a synergistic effect , meaning consuming both is significantly more damaging to brain tissue than consuming either alone , wreaking particular havoc in the hippocampus , the area responsible for learning and memory , and causing a marked decline in IQ .
Even Wikipedia can ’ t deny that lead exposure causes brain damage , although its entry @ @ @ @ @ @ @ correlation between lead exposure in children and criminal behavior , lumping it under the vague rubric of “ behavioral problems ” instead .
So how is it that Wikipedia gives SiFs a certificate of safety ?
Nowhere in the article on hexafluorosilicic acid are the safety risks even mentioned , aside from a single sentence about the dangers of inhaling its vapors .
In fact , the article has more to say about hexafluorosilicic acid ’ s effects on “ glass and stoneware ” than on the human body !
Wikipedia briefly notes @ @ @ @ @ @ @ though it is careful not to suggest that such overexposure can occur merely by drinking tap water .
It references “ the higher doses used to treat osteoporosis ” after acknowledging earlier in the article that fluoride is utterly ineffective at treating osteoporosis , mentioning “ pain in the legs ” and “ incomplete stress fractures when the doses are too high ” ( no comment on why a substance that causes stress fractures would be used to treat a bone-weakening disease like osteoporosis ) , as well as stomach irritation .
According @ @ @ @ @ @ @ adverse effect ” of water fluoridation is dental fluorosis !
Hundreds of scientific studies would beg to differ .
In 2018 alone over a dozen studies pointing to this toxic substance ’ s detrimental effects have been published , only to be ignored by the mainstream media and barred from addition to Wikipedia .
A Mexican study published in Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology concluded “ Fluoride could be considered an environmental kidney toxicant ” after studying populations exposed to both fluoride and arsenic in drinking water .
At least Wikipedia admits arsenic is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ arsenic was found to have a less nephrotoxic effect than fluoride .
A Kenyan study published in the American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences reported that auditory working memory significantly declined as fluoride concentration in drinking water increased , confirming the results of an earlier systematic review showing lower IQ in children in high-fluoride areas .
These effects were observed at concentrations as low as 0.5 mg/L – the low end of the scale recommended by the World Health Organization , which recommends fluoridation at concentrations as high as 1.5 mg/L .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ positively correlated to ADHD symptoms in children as much as 12 years later , A pair of Polish studies published in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences and the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health observed strong evidence for fluoride ’ s role in triggering and progressing Alzheimer ’ s disease and other dementias , given the substance ’ s role in oxidative stress and inflammation .
Fluoride ’ s toxicity extends from the skeletal system , through the endocrine system , reproductive system , and neurological system , but none @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Wikipedia .
Decades of solid scientific research are memory-holed with the blanket statement that there is “ no clear evidence.
” Wikipedia even claims there have been only three reported cases of fluoride toxicity associated with toothpaste ingestion , when in fact there are over 23,000 reports of toothpaste-related fluoride poisoning annually .
This represents hundreds of emergency rooms visits for fluoride poisoning at substantial and unnecessary medical cost .
There ’ s a sound reason why so few of these kinds of studies are conducted in the heavily-fluoridated US and find their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Medical Hypotheses touched on this discrepancy , finding organizational bias “ can and does compromise the integrity of fluoride research.
” The only logical explanation for how so many studies have found evidence of neurotoxicity and toxicity in other tissues – even sky-high rates of dental fluorosis , despite the prevailing wisdom that fluoridation is that it is “ good for teeth.
” Nevertheless this practice persists and the American Dental Association fully endorses this charade .
The Orthomolecular Medicine News Service reported that the CDC ’ s public relations make the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in fluoridation , $ 38 are saved in dental costs .
In fact , the actual analysis indicates that the best case scenario is a $ 3 savings , which is rapidly “ eliminated by the estimated cost of treating dental fluorosis.
” Ever since Harvard University researcher Philippe Grandjean first added fluoride to a list of developmental neurotoxicants considered especially harmful to the developing brain in a 2014 paper published in The Lancet , our health officials have suffered from institutionalized cognitive dissonance by categorically denying fluoride-induced illness .
As more papers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , including fluoride , are added to the list of chemicals most damaging to human development , Dr. Grandjean and his colleagues have called for the formation of an international clearinghouse to coordinate research into the neurotoxicants and their role in the rising global prevalence of neurodevelopmental disabilities .
Sadly , such an urgent endeavor would likely be completely ignored by the US ’ federal health and environmental authorities .
In the meantime , Wikipedia is firmly lodged in this carry-over of scientific-naivety that was the public rage in the 1950s , when @ @ @ @ @ @ @ teeth , DDT would keep the bugs away , and humanity would be saved by our friend the atomic bomb .
Richard Gale is the Executive Producer of the Progressive Radio Network and a former Senior Research Analyst in the biotechnology and genomic industries .
Dr. Gary Null is the host of America ’ s longest running public radio program on alternative and nutritional health and a multi-award-winning documentary film director , including War on Health and more recently Last Call for Tomorrow .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Own Newsfeed

Wikipedia: Dumb and Dumber About Fluoridation
by Richard Gale & Gary Null PhD
Progressive Radio Network
In the satirical black comedy film Dr. Strangelove there is the iconic scene when the rogue general Jack D Ripper, played by Sterling Hayden, tells Peter Sellers character,
“Ever hear of the fluoridation of water? Do you realize that fluoridation is the most monstrously conceived and dangerous Communist plot we ever had to face?”
From that day until now, the entire pharmaceutical industry, public health officials and the mainstream media have assumed that fluoride is absolutely safe, and anyone who dares to criticize water fluoridation and its dental use is a loon or conspiracy theorist who threatens national health.
Yet, as with so many medical and health challenges we face, the dominant consensus is wrong. The large body of evidence to support anti-fluoridation advocacy is substantial and continues to grow.
In fact, throughout the US and other nations, concerned citizens, consumer activists and whistleblowers are putting pressure on state and local governments and public utilities to cease and desist in spiking our drinking water with fluoride.
Recently, the pushback against decades of lies, misinformation and media propaganda to seduce into accepting corporate and government sponsored junk research supporting fluoridation is reaching a tipping point towards public safety.
Earlier this year, an alliance of public health organizations and watch groups filed suit against the Environmental Protection Agency in a federal court trial to bring an end to fluoridation once and for all.
In a more recent ruling the judge has permitted the suit, represented by two distinguished attorneys – Robert F Kennedy Jr and Michel Connett — to continue given “the merits in light of the substantial scientific evidence proffered at trial.”
And earlier this past August, researchers at Mount Sinai School of Medicine announced their findings that low-level chronic exposure to fluoride in drinking water induces adverse changes in kidney and liver function in young people. The evidence against fluoride continues to pile up.
The CDC’s and EPA’s farce has earned a powerful voice.
Wikipedia is a staunch defender of water fluoridation and promoter of this toxic propaganda. Parroting the statements of arch-Skeptic Stephen Barrett, Wikipedia’s editors sacrifice reams of scientific data to push the scientifically-debunked theories of those who would put this proven neurotoxin into every reservoir and public water utility thereby exposing generation after generation to a drug whose harms are well established yet still vehemently suppressed.
Wikipedia’s quick summary description of sodium fluoride merely states that it is “used to prevent cavities” and that it is the 215th most prescribed medication in the US.
This benevolent description is posted without any context and stated as a matter-of-fact commandment that orally-consumed fluoride has no proven effect on dental health aside from causing dental fluorosis, an unsightly mottling of the teeth.
Studies that suggest this can be a sign of fluoride-induced brain damage are ignored. Also missing are the scientific warnings about fluoride’s detrimental effects on nearly every system of the human body, which have been repeatedly studied and confirmed.
Under the heading “Dental Caries,” Wikipedia repeats the faulty wisdom about how fluoride is supposed to work to enhance the formation of fluorapatite, a component of tooth enamel.
It does not mention that studies have shown that this fluorapatite layer is just six nanometers thick, less than 1/10000th the width of a strand of hair and therefore unlikely to have much of an impact strengthening or re-mineralizing teeth.
To its credit, Wikipedia does admit – without explaining the implications – that sodium fluoride is rarely used in the US for fluoridating water.
Instead, hexafluorosilicic acid and sodium hexafluorosilicate, toxic byproducts of phosphate fertilizer and aluminum manufacturing, are used.
Wikipedia does not discuss the industrial origins of these compounds (called silicofluorides or SiFs) nor their toxicity – both are deemed industrial pollutants if released into the air via factory smokestacks or into the environment via drainpipes.
Yet when deliberately added to drinking water they are classified as benevolent.
Nor does Wikipedia mention that these fluoride compounds have never been approved or even tested by the FDA for safety. Nor are we informed that studies have shown that SiFs can double or even triple the rate of lead uptake into children’s bloodstreams by only citing a single study to discredit this “hypothesis.”
Adding SiFs to drinking water lowers its pH, rendering it more corrosive and thus more likely to leach lead and other contaminants as it flows through pipes.
But even when a neutralizing agent is added, SiFs’ “unique affinity for lead” leach even tiny amounts of the metal from any lead-containing pipe or fixture through which treated water flows.
Used in combination with chlorine and chloramine, common disinfectants added to drinking water, the rate of lead uptake from SiF-treated water is off the charts.
SiFs and lead have a synergistic effect, meaning consuming both is significantly more damaging to brain tissue than consuming either alone, wreaking particular havoc in the hippocampus, the area responsible for learning and memory, and causing a marked decline in IQ.
Even Wikipedia can’t deny that lead exposure causes brain damage, although its entry for lead poisoning fails to mention the correlation between lead exposure in children and criminal behavior, lumping it under the vague rubric of “behavioral problems” instead.
So how is it that Wikipedia gives SiFs a certificate of safety? Nowhere in the article on hexafluorosilicic acid are the safety risks even mentioned, aside from a single sentence about the dangers of inhaling its vapors. In fact, the article has more to say about hexafluorosilicic acid’s effects on “glass and stoneware” than on the human body!
Wikipedia briefly notes the negative effects of fluoride overexposure, though it is careful not to suggest that such overexposure can occur merely by drinking tap water. It references “the higher doses used to treat osteoporosis” after acknowledging earlier in the article that fluoride is utterly ineffective at treating osteoporosis, mentioning “pain in the legs” and “incomplete stress fractures when the doses are too high” (no comment on why a substance that causes stress fractures would be used to treat a bone-weakening disease like osteoporosis), as well as stomach irritation.
According to Wikipedia, the only “clear adverse effect” of water fluoridation is dental fluorosis! Hundreds of scientific studies would beg to differ. In 2018 alone over a dozen studies pointing to this toxic substance’s detrimental effects have been published, only to be ignored by the mainstream media and barred from addition to Wikipedia.
A Mexican study published in Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology concluded “Fluoride could be considered an environmental kidney toxicant” after studying populations exposed to both fluoride and arsenic in drinking water. At least Wikipedia admits arsenic is poisonous!
But it is ironic that arsenic was found to have a less nephrotoxic effect than fluoride.
A Kenyan study published in the American Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences reported that auditory working memory significantly declined as fluoride concentration in drinking water increased, confirming the results of an earlier systematic review showing lower IQ in children in high-fluoride areas.
These effects were observed at concentrations as low as 0.5 mg/L – the low end of the scale recommended by the World Health Organization, which recommends fluoridation at concentrations as high as 1.5 mg/L. Another Mexican study found prenatal fluoride exposure positively correlated to ADHD symptoms in children as much as 12 years later,
“consistent with the growing body of evidence suggesting neurotoxicity of early-life exposure to fluoride.”
A pair of Polish studies published in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences and the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health observed strong evidence for fluoride’s role in triggering and progressing Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, given the substance’s role in oxidative stress and inflammation.
Fluoride’s toxicity extends from the skeletal system, through the endocrine system, reproductive system, and neurological system, but none of these myriad effects are discussed in Wikipedia.
Decades of solid scientific research are memory-holed with the blanket statement that there is “no clear evidence.” Wikipedia even claims there have been only three reported cases of fluoride toxicity associated with toothpaste ingestion, when in fact there are over 23,000 reports of toothpaste-related fluoride poisoning annually.
This represents hundreds of emergency rooms visits for fluoride poisoning at substantial and unnecessary medical cost.
There’s a sound reason why so few of these kinds of studies are conducted in the heavily-fluoridated US and find their way into Wikipedia. One study published in Medical Hypotheses touched on this discrepancy, finding organizational bias “can and does compromise the integrity of fluoride research.”
The only logical explanation for how so many studies have found evidence of neurotoxicity and toxicity in other tissues – even sky-high rates of dental fluorosis, despite the prevailing wisdom that fluoridation is that it is “good for teeth.”
Nevertheless this practice persists and the American Dental Association fully endorses this charade. The Orthomolecular Medicine News Service reported that the CDC’s public relations make the dubious claim that for every dollar invested in fluoridation, $38 are saved in dental costs. In fact, the actual analysis indicates that the best case scenario is a $3 savings, which is rapidly “eliminated by the estimated cost of treating dental fluorosis.”
Ever since Harvard University researcher Philippe Grandjean first added fluoride to a list of developmental neurotoxicants considered especially harmful to the developing brain in a 2014 paper published in The Lancet, our health officials have suffered from institutionalized cognitive dissonance by categorically denying fluoride-induced illness.
As more papers identifying the adverse risks of environmental toxins, including fluoride, are added to the list of chemicals most damaging to human development, Dr. Grandjean and his colleagues have called for the formation of an international clearinghouse to coordinate research into the neurotoxicants and their role in the rising global prevalence of neurodevelopmental disabilities. Sadly, such an urgent endeavor would likely be completely ignored by the US’ federal health and environmental authorities.
In the meantime, Wikipedia is firmly lodged in this carry-over of scientific-naivety that was the public rage in the 1950s, when fluoride was the magic ingredient for whiter teeth, DDT would keep the bugs away, and humanity would be saved by our friend the atomic bomb.
About the Authors
Richard Gale is the Executive Producer of the Progressive Radio Network and a former Senior Research Analyst in the biotechnology and genomic industries.
Dr. Gary Null is the host of America’s longest running public radio program on alternative and nutritional health and a multi-award-winning documentary film director, including War on Health and more recently Last Call for Tomorrow.
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-09-07--Kentucky Court Rejects Immunity Claim for Social Worker Illegally Entering Home and Strip Searching

Kentucky Court Rejects Immunity Claim for Social Worker Illegally Entering Home and Strip Searching Children

Thanks to a ruling in a federal district court in Kentucky last [ month ] , a child welfare investigator can no longer claim qualified immunity for bullying their way into a home and strip-searching children without cause .
The case , Josiah Curry , et al v. Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services , et al , arose from a 2017 incident .
On a cool March day , Holly Curry opted to leave her children asleep in her van while she went into a café to get them some muffins .
She was inside less than ten @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hotline tip , she was met by a police officer when she came back outside .
The officer did not file any charges against Holly , but he warned her not to leave her children unattended .
And he told her he would have to report the incident to the Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services .
The following day , child welfare investigator Jeanetta Childress went to the Curry home and insisted on being allowed inside .
Holly asked to see a warrant , and when Childress failed to produce one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Childress left to get police officer Michael Furnish , then returned .
Again , Curry asked to see their warrant , and again , there was none .
But Childress , backed by an armed and uniformed Furnish , threatened to take the Curry children into foster care if Childress and Furnish were not allowed in to investigate .
In tears , Holly finally relented .
Once inside , Childress proceeded to interview the two oldest children alone , then to strip-search the youngest children , with Furnish ’ s help .
Finding @ @ @ @ @ @ @ since no abuse had ever been alleged—Childress closed the case as “ unsubstantiated.
” And , far too often , that would have been the end of the story .
But in this case , the Currys filed suit against both Childress and Furnish for violating their Fourth Amendment right to be secure in their homes and their children ’ s Fourth Amendment right to bodily integrity .
In other words , the Currys alleged that both the warrantless , forced entry and the strip searches of the children violated the Constitution .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ the court to dismiss the case , citing qualified immunity .
Qualified immunity is the legal doctrine that says a civil servant can not be held personally liable for actions taken in their official capacity for violating one ’ s constitutional rights , if a reasonable official in their shoes would not have known their action was contrary to a federal right .
And , far too often , that would be the end of the story .
That is what makes this case so refreshing .
Instead of allowing bad actors to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has left Childress and Furnish to face the consequences of their violations against this family ’ s Fourth Amendment rights .
Can a child welfare investigator strip-search a child without cause ?
According to the ruling , “ Childress repeatedly testified that she believed she should ‘ automatically ’ strip search any child that was four or under.
” But do child welfare investigators in general believe this ?
Like me , the court found this “ incredibl [ e ] , ” adding , “ The Constitution protects against that approach to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reasonable social worker could think otherwise.
” Comment on this article at MedicalKidnap.com .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed Medical Kidnapping : A Threat to Every Family in America T-Shirt See : Medical Kidnapping : A Threat to Every Family in America Today Help spread the awareness of Medical Kidnapping by wearing the Medical Kidnapping t-shirt !
Support the cause of MedicalKidnap.com , which is part of the Health Impact News network .
Support the cause against Medical Kidnapping by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ know people who are skeptical and can not believe that medical kidnapping happens in the U.S. today , this is the book for them !
Backed with solid references and real life examples , they will not be able to deny the plain evidence before them , and will become better educated on this topic that is destroying the American family .
2 Books Retail : $ 49.98 ( for 2 books ) FREE Shipping Available !
Now : $ 19.99 ( for 2 books ) Order here !

by Michael Ramey
Parental Rights Foundation
Excerpts:
Thanks to a ruling in a federal district court in Kentucky last [month], a child welfare investigator can no longer claim qualified immunity for bullying their way into a home and strip-searching children without cause.
The case, Josiah Curry, et al v. Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services, et al, arose from a 2017 incident.
On a cool March day, Holly Curry opted to leave her children asleep in her van while she went into a café to get them some muffins. She was inside less than ten minutes, but thanks to an anonymous hotline tip, she was met by a police officer when she came back outside.
The officer did not file any charges against Holly, but he warned her not to leave her children unattended. And he told her he would have to report the incident to the Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services.
Entering without a Warrant
The following day, child welfare investigator Jeanetta Childress went to the Curry home and insisted on being allowed inside. Holly asked to see a warrant, and when Childress failed to produce one, refused to let her in.
Childress left to get police officer Michael Furnish, then returned. Again, Curry asked to see their warrant, and again, there was none. But Childress, backed by an armed and uniformed Furnish, threatened to take the Curry children into foster care if Childress and Furnish were not allowed in to investigate. In tears, Holly finally relented.
Once inside, Childress proceeded to interview the two oldest children alone, then to strip-search the youngest children, with Furnish’s help.
Finding no evidence of any wrongdoing—not surprising, since no abuse had ever been alleged—Childress closed the case as “unsubstantiated.”
And, far too often, that would have been the end of the story.
But in this case, the Currys filed suit against both Childress and Furnish for violating their Fourth Amendment right to be secure in their homes and their children’s Fourth Amendment right to bodily integrity. In other words, the Currys alleged that both the warrantless, forced entry and the strip searches of the children violated the Constitution.
Qualified Immunity
Not surprisingly, Childress and Furnish petitioned the court to dismiss the case, citing qualified immunity.
Qualified immunity is the legal doctrine that says a civil servant cannot be held personally liable for actions taken in their official capacity for violating one’s constitutional rights, if a reasonable official in their shoes would not have known their action was contrary to a federal right.
And, far too often, that would be the end of the story.
That is what makes this case so refreshing.
Instead of allowing bad actors to hide behind qualified immunity, the judge has left Childress and Furnish to face the consequences of their violations against this family’s Fourth Amendment rights.
Can a child welfare investigator strip-search a child without cause? According to the ruling, “Childress repeatedly testified that she believed she should ‘automatically’ strip search any child that was four or under.” But do child welfare investigators in general believe this?
Like me, the court found this “incredibl[e],” adding, “The Constitution protects against that approach to children’s privacy, and no reasonable social worker could think otherwise.”
Continue reading the article at Parental Rights Foundation.
Comment on this article at MedicalKidnap.com.
See Also:
Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through
Medical Kidnapping: A Threat to Every Family in America T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton!
Order here!
Medical Kidnapping is REAL!
See: Medical Kidnapping: A Threat to Every Family in America Today
Help spread the awareness of Medical Kidnapping by wearing the Medical Kidnapping t-shirt!
Support the cause of MedicalKidnap.com, which is part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!
Support the cause against Medical Kidnapping by purchasing our new book!
If you know people who are skeptical and cannot believe that medical kidnapping happens in the U.S. today, this is the book for them! Backed with solid references and real life examples, they will not be able to deny the plain evidence before them, and will become better educated on this topic that is destroying the American family.
1 Book – 228 pages
Retail: $24.99
FREE Shipping Available!
Now: $14.99
Order here!
2 Books
Retail: $49.98 (for 2 books)
FREE Shipping Available!
Now: $19.99 (for 2 books)
Order here!