healthimpactnews--2020-06-29--CENSORED: COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless – Everything We’ve Been Told about COVID

CENSORED: COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless – Everything We’ve Been Told about COVID is a HOAX!

In what should be HEADLINE news coverage in every single major news organization across the globe , the Independent publication “ Off-Guardian , ” which describes their organization as : COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless – Though the whole world relies on RT-PCR to “ diagnose ” Sars-Cov-2 infection , the science is clear : they are not fit for purpose .
We have covered this topic of inaccurate COVID tests previously , of course , and when I first saw this article pop up in my news-feed over the weekend , I made a note to come back @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that I would find more of the same evidence that we have already published on this topic , that there is no clear evidence that COVID tests are accurate .
This investigative , highly researched article goes way beyond just pointing out that the evidence is lacking regarding the accuracy of COVID tests currently in the market .
They actually prove , beyond a shadow of doubt , that the PCR test which is considered the “ gold standard ” in COVID testing , is completely “ meaningless.
” This must be the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the COVID Plandemic !
The article is credited to two journalists : Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter .
Here are their bios : Torsten Engelbrecht is an award-winning journalist and author from Hamburg , Germany .
In 2006 he co-authored Virus-Mania with Dr Klaus Kohnlein , and in 2009 he won the German Alternate Media Award .
He has also written for Rubikon , Süddeutsche Zeitung , Financial Times Deutschland and many others .
Konstantin Demeter is a freelance photographer and an independent researcher .
Together with the journalist Torsten Engelbrecht he has @ @ @ @ @ @ @ crisis in the online magazine Rubikon , as well as contributions on the monetary system , geopolitics , and the media in Swiss Italian newspapers .
Their introduction clearly states the results of their investigations : The article continues by showing how belief in the PCR COVID test is more akin to a religious belief , than anything based on science .
Next , they give background information about Kary Mullis , the inventor of the Polymerase Chain Reaction ( PCR ) technology .
After this introductory background , they get into some @ @ @ @ @ @ @ test , starting with the fact that this is no valid “ gold standard ” with which to test the accuracy for the COVID PCR test .
Moreover , it is worth mentioning that the PCR tests used to identify so-called COVID-19 patients presumably infected by what is called SARS-CoV-2 do not have a valid gold standard to compare them with .
This is a fundamental point .
Tests need to be evaluated to determine their preciseness — strictly speaking their “ sensitivity ” [ 1 ] and “ specificity ” — by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” meaning the most accurate method available .
As an example , for a pregnancy test the gold standard would be the pregnancy itself .
But as Australian infectious diseases specialist Sanjaya Senanayake , for example , stated in an ABC TV interview in an answer to the question “ How accurate is the [ COVID-19 ] testing ?
” : If we had a new test for picking up [ the bacterium ] golden staph in blood , we ’ ve already got blood cultures , that ’ s our gold standard @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and we could match this new test against that .
But for COVID-19 we don ’ t have a gold standard test.
” Jessica C. Watson from Bristol University confirms this .
In her paper “ Interpreting a COVID-19 test result ” , published recently in The British Medical Journal , she writes that there is a “ lack of such a clear-cut ‘ gold-standard ’ for COVID-19 testing.
” But instead of classifying the tests as unsuitable for SARS-CoV-2 detection and COVID-19 diagnosis , or instead of pointing out that only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ purification , can be a solid gold standard , Watson claims in all seriousness that , “ pragmatically ” COVID-19 diagnosis itself , remarkably including PCR testing itself , “ may be the best available ‘ gold standard ’ .
” But this is not scientifically sound .
Apart from the fact that it is downright absurd to take the PCR test itself as part of the gold standard to evaluate the PCR test , there are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19 , as even people such as Thomas Löscher , former @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Tropical Medicine at the University of Munich and member of the Federal Association of German Internists , conceded to us [ 2 ] .
And if there are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19 , COVID-19 diagnosis — contrary to Watson ’ s statement — can not be suitable for serving as a valid gold standard .
In addition , “ experts ” such as Watson overlook the fact that only virus isolation , i.e .
an unequivocal virus proof , can be the gold standard .
That is why I asked Watson @ @ @ @ @ @ @ best available gold standard , ” if there are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19 , and also whether the virus itself , that is virus isolation , wouldn ’ t be the best available/possible gold standard .
But she hasn ’ t answered these questions yet – despite multiple requests .
And she has not yet responded to our rapid response post on her article in which we address exactly the same points , either , though she wrote us on June 2nd : “ I will try to post a reply @ @ @ @ @ @ @ chance.
” No proof for the RNA being of viral origin Next , they deal with this issue that in order to prove the existence of a new virus , you first have to isolate it to determine its RNA .
Now the question is : What is required first for virus isolation/proof ?
We need to know where the RNA for which the PCR tests are calibrated comes from .
As textbooks ( e.g.
, White/Fenner .
Medical Virology , 1986 , p. 9 ) as well as leading virus researchers such @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , particle purification — i.e .
the separation of an object from everything else that is not that object , as for instance Nobel laureate Marie Curie purified 100 mg of radium chloride in 1898 by extracting it from tons of pitchblende — is an essential pre-requisite for proving the existence of a virus , and thus to prove that the RNA from the particle in question comes from a new virus .
The reason for this is that PCR is extremely sensitive , which means it can detect even the smallest pieces @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can not determine where these particles came from .
That has to be determined beforehand .
And because the PCR tests are calibrated for gene sequences ( in this case RNA sequences because SARS-CoV-2 is believed to be a RNA virus ) , we have to know that these gene snippets are part of the looked-for virus .
And to know that , correct isolation and purification of the presumed virus has to be executed .
Hence , we have asked the science teams of the relevant papers which are referred to in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the electron-microscopic shots depicted in their in vitro experiments show purified viruses .
But not a single team could answer that question with “ yes ” — and NB.
, nobody said purification was not a necessary step .
We only got answers like “ No , we did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification ” ( see below ) .
We asked several study authors “ Do your electron micrographs show the purified virus ?
” , they gave the following responses : Study 1 : Leo L. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Emergence of a novel human coronavirus threatening human health ” Nature Medicine , March 2020 Replying Author : Malik Peiris Date : May 12 , 2020 Answer : “ The image is the virus budding from an infected cell .
It is not purified virus.
” Study 2 : Myung-Guk Han et al .
“ Identification of Coronavirus Isolated from a Patient in Korea with COVID-19 ” , Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives , February 2020 Replying Author : Myung-Guk Han Date : May 6 , 2020 Answer : “ We could @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we do not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in cells.
” Study 3 : Wan Beom Park et al .
“ Virus Isolation from the First Patient with SARS-CoV-2 in Korea ” , Journal of Korean Medical Science , February 24 , 2020 Replying Author : Wan Beom Park Date : March 19 , 2020 Answer : “ We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification.
” Study 4 : Na Zhu et al.
, “ A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China ” , 2019 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ February 20 , 2020 Replying Author : Wenjie Tan Date : March 18 , 2020 Answer : “ [ We show ] an image of sedimented virus particles , not purified ones.
” Regarding the mentioned papers it is clear that what is shown in the electron micrographs ( EMs ) is the end result of the experiment , meaning there is no other result that they could have made EMs from .
That is to say , if the authors of these studies concede that their published EMs do not show purified @ @ @ @ @ @ @ possess purified particles claimed to be viral .
( In this context , it has to be remarked that some researchers use the term “ isolation ” in their papers , but the procedures described therein do not represent a proper isolation ( purification ) process .
Consequently , in this context the term “ isolation ” is misused ) .
Thus , the authors of four of the principal , early 2020 papers claiming discovery of a new coronavirus concede they had no proof that the origin of the virus genome was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or impure , or particles of any kind .
In other words , the existence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA is based on faith , not fact .
We have also contacted Dr Charles Calisher , who is a seasoned virologist .
In 2001 , Science published an “ impassioned plea…to the younger generation ” from several veteran virologists , among them Calisher , saying that : [ modern virus detection methods like ] sleek polymerase chain reaction [ … ] tell little or nothing about how a virus multiplies , which animals carry it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ people sick .
[ It is ] like trying to say whether somebody has bad breath by looking at his fingerprint.
” [ 3 ] And that ’ s why we asked Dr Calisher whether he knows one single paper in which SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated and finally really purified .
His answer : I know of no such a publication .
I have kept an eye out for one.
” [ 4 ] This actually means that one can not conclude that the RNA gene sequences , which the scientists took from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in vitro trials and for which the PCR tests are finally being “ calibrated , ” belong to a specific virus — in this case SARS-CoV-2 .
In addition , there is no scientific proof that those RNA sequences are the causative agent of what is called COVID-19 .
In order to establish a causal connection , one way or the other , i.e .
beyond virus isolation and purification , it would have been absolutely necessary to carry out an experiment that satisfies the four Koch ’ s postulates .
But there @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Devereux and Rosemary Frei recently revealed for OffGuardian .
The necessity to fulfill these postulates regarding SARS-CoV-2 is demonstrated not least by the fact that attempts have been made to fulfill them .
But even researchers claiming they have done it , in reality , did not succeed .
One example is a study published in Nature on May 7 .
This trial , besides other procedures which render the study invalid , did not meet any of the postulates .
For instance , the alleged “ infected ” laboratory mice did not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to pneumonia , which according to the third postulate should actually occur if a dangerous and potentially deadly virus was really at work there .
And the slight bristles and weight loss , which were observed temporarily in the animals are negligible , not only because they could have been caused by the procedure itself , but also because the weight went back to normal again .
Also , no animal died except those they killed to perform the autopsies .
And let ’ s not forget : These experiments should have been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is not the case .
Revealingly , none of the leading German representatives of the official theory about SARS-Cov-2/COVID-19 — the Robert Koch-Institute ( RKI ) , Alexander S. Kekulé ( University of Halle ) , Hartmut Hengel and Ralf Bartenschlager ( German Society for Virology ) , the aforementioned Thomas Löscher , Ulrich Dirnagl ( Charité Berlin ) or Georg Bornkamm ( virologist and professor emeritus at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Munich ) — could answer the following question I have sent them : If the particles that are claimed to be to be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ do you want to be sure that the RNA gene sequences of these particles belong to a specific new virus ?
Particularly , if there are studies showing that substances such as antibiotics that are added to the test tubes in the in vitro experiments carried out for virus detection can “ stress ” the cell culture in a way that new gene sequences are being formed that were not previously detectable — an aspect that Nobel laureate Barbara McClintock already drew attention to in her Nobel Lecture back in 1983 .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ got the Charité – the employer of Christian Drosten , Germany ’ s most influential virologist in respect of COVID-19 , advisor to the German government and co-developer of the PCR test which was the first to be “ accepted ” ( not validated ! )
by the WHO worldwide – to answer questions on the topic .
But we didn ’ t get answers until June 18 , 2020 , after months of non-response .
In the end , we achieved it only with the help of Berlin lawyer Viviane Fischer .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ convinced itself that appropriate particle purification was carried out ?
, ” the Charité concedes that they didn ’ t use purified particles .
And although they claim “ virologists at the Charité are sure that they are testing for the virus , ” in their paper ( Corman et al . )
they state : RNA was extracted from clinical samples with the MagNA Pure 96 system ( Roche , Penzberg , Germany ) and from cell culture supernatants with the viral RNA mini kit ( QIAGEN , Hilden , Germany ) @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the RNA was viral .
Incidentally , the Corman et al .
paper , published on January 23 , 2020 didn ’ t even go through a proper peer review process , nor were the procedures outlined therein accompanied by controls — although it is only through these two things that scientific work becomes really solid .
Next , the article deals with what we have reported numerous times here at Health Impact News , that the current COVID tests in the market are notorious for being inaccurate and giving false results .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ not know the false positive rate of the PCR tests without widespread testing of people who certainly do not have the virus , proven by a method which is independent of the test ( having a solid gold standard ) .
Therefore , it is hardly surprising that there are several papers illustrating irrational test results .
For example , already in February the health authority in China ’ s Guangdong province reported that people have fully recovered from illness blamed on COVID-19 , started to test “ negative , ” and then @ @ @ @ @ @ @ month later , a paper published in the Journal of Medical Virology showed that 29 out of 610 patients at a hospital in Wuhan had 3 to 6 test results that flipped between “ negative ” , “ positive ” and “ dubious ” .
A third example is a study from Singapore in which tests were carried out almost daily on 18 patients and the majority went from “ positive ” to “ negative ” back to “ positive ” at least once , and up to five times in one patient @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences , conceded in February that the PCR tests are “ only 30 to 50 per cent accurate ” ; while Sin Hang Lee from the Milford Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory sent a letter to the WHO ’ s coronavirus response team and to Anthony S. Fauci on March 22 , 2020 , saying that : It has been widely reported in the social media that the RT-qPCR [ Reverse Transcriptase quantitative PCR ] test kits used to detect SARSCoV-2 RNA in human specimens are generating many false positive @ @ @ @ @ @ @ detect some real positive cases.
” In other words , even if we theoretically assume that these PCR tests can really detect a viral infection , the tests would be practically worthless , and would only cause an unfounded scare among the “ positive ” people tested .
This becomes also evident considering the positive predictive value ( PPV ) .
The PPV indicates the probability that a person with a positive test result is truly “ positive ” ( ie .
has the supposed virus ) , and it depends on two @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the general population and the specificity of the test , that is the percentage of people without disease in whom the test is correctly “ negative ” ( a test with a specificity of 95 % incorrectly gives a positive result in 5 out of 100 non-infected people ) .
With the same specificity , the higher the prevalence , the higher the PPV .
In this context , on June 12 2020 , the journal Deutsches Ärzteblatt published an article in which the PPV has been calculated with three different prevalence @ @ @ @ @ @ @ course , be viewed very critically , first because it is not possible to calculate the specificity without a solid gold standard , as outlined , and second because the calculations in the article are based on the specificity determined in the study by Jessica Watson , which is potentially worthless , as also mentioned .
But if you abstract from it , assuming that the underlying specificity of 95 % is correct and that we know the prevalence , even the mainstream medical journal Deutsches Ärzteblatt reports that the so-called SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” PPV .
In one of the three scenarios , figuring with an assumed prevalence of 3 % , the PPV was only 30 percent , which means that 70 percent of the people tested “ positive ” are not “ positive ” at all .
Yet “ they are prescribed quarantine , ” as even the Ärzteblatt notes critically .
In a second scenario of the journal ’ s article , a prevalence of rate of 20 percent is assumed .
In this case they generate a PPV of 78 percent , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ positive ” tests are false “ positives.
” That would mean : If we take the around 9 million people who are currently considered “ positive ” worldwide — supposing that the true “ positives ” really have a viral infection — we would get almost 2 million false “ positives.
” All this fits with the fact that the CDC and the FDA , for instance , concede in their files that the so-called “ SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests ” are not suitable for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis .
In the “ CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ file from March 30 , 2020 , for example , it says : Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms ” This test can not rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.
” And the FDA admits that : positive results [ … ] do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses .
The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease.
” Remarkably , in the instruction manuals @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that they are not intended as a diagnostic test , as for instance in those by Altona Diagnostics and Creative Diagnostics [ 5 ] .
To quote another one , in the product announcement of the LightMix Modular Assays produced by TIB Molbiol — which were developed using the Corman et al .
protocol — and distributed by Roche we can read : These assays are not intended for use as an aid in the diagnosis of coronavirus infection ” For research use only .
Not for use in diagnostic procedures.
” CONCLUSION @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what it Really is : A HOAX !
We are Talking About Crimes Against Humanity !
!
Think about the ramifications of what we have just learned from this incredible investigative report that no corporate media source will ever publish .
As the corporate media continues to publish stories stating that a second wave is now in place in some parts of the country with a spike in new “ COVID cases , ” what does that actually mean ?
It means NOTHING !
Most of these “ new cases ” are asymptomatic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ !
In some places more people are all of a sudden going to the hospital who are reportedly sick , so what does that mean in terms of COVID “ outbreaks ” in these new “ hot spots ” that are prompting more shut downs ?
It means NOTHING !
All it means is more people are using the hospitals for whatever reasons ; either they really are sick from something , or they believe they are sick from something , and the media is TELLING them that this “ something ” is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ACCURATE TEST AVAILABLE TO PROVE !
!
I know I will get emails and comments from people , like I already have , claiming I am wrong , because they know someone who got sick , or they know someone who died , from COVID-19 .
No , you do NOT know that !
All you “ know ” is that they got sick , or died , or tested positive , etc .
But if you claim that COVID caused this , you just moved from the realm of reality based on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of BELIEF where you attribute this to COVID based on what has been told to you .
So now that you have been presented with the FACTS that what is being promoted as the most accurate COVID test in the market , the PCR test , is actually “ scientifically meaningless , ” will you hold on to your faith in COVID ?
What about the COVID Vaccine Bill Gates , the WHO , the U.S. Government , and Big Pharma are all rushing to develop and inject into every single human being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in COVID strong enough to voluntarily get this new vaccine when it comes out ?
If COVID is truly a HOAX since there is no way to prove its existence through testing , what should we call the vaccine they are developing for this HOAX ?
How about a weapon of mass destruction ?
( WMD ) We didn ’ t find WMDs when President Bush led our nation to invade and take over Iraq years ago , but pretty soon we will find WMDs in every pharmacy in the U.S. and around @ @ @ @ @ @ @ already promised us that the military will be used to deploy this new vaccine .
The measures that have been taken to fight against the unseen enemy of a “ virus ” which we now know is a HOAX has caused REAL harm , and death .
I have been reporting for years now how dangerous the flu vaccine is , especially for seniors in assisted living facilities .
Every year many die just after getting a flu vaccine that is usually 4X more potent than the regular flu vaccine , and it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
This year , the causalities in these assisted living facilities were catastrophic and far worse .
Why ?
NOT because of a COVID virus that we now know is a HOAX !
No , these seniors were MURDERED !
Most of them are too weak and too frail to fight for themselves , and are dependent on family members and friends who advocate for them and stand up to the bullying tactics used by the Medical System which has little to no regard for their lives .
But because of the lock @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , helpless members of our society were completely cut off from the only ones who could advocate for them , and as a result many of them were murdered .
How long are we going to put up with this America ?
?
!
!
You better decide fast !
Because they ’ re coming for your kids next… .
Resist wearing a mask !
Resist being tested !
DON ’ T shut down your business just because they tell you it is “ non-essential !
” We are at WAR , America @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wakes up and starts REFUSING to participate in their own destruction , the sooner we can begin to take our country back .
But to do so , we need to stop fighting each other , and recognize who the REAL enemy is .
Unmasking Who is Behind the Plandemic and Rioting to Usher in the New World Order FDA Criticized as COVID Tests Still not Accurate , But U.S. Starts Second Lockdown Anyway Not a Single COVID-19 Test is FDA Approved – Do We Really Know Who has COVID-19 and Who Does @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ Not Worth Anything – Two of us could do it Overnight in the Garage ” Ground Zero in Wuhan : What Really Happened that Caused the World to go on Lock Down ?
Tanzania suspends laboratory head after coronavirus test returned positive results on a goat and a pawpaw Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
In what should be HEADLINE news coverage in every single major news organization across the globe, the Independent publication “Off-Guardian,” which describes their organization as:
“Unlike the Guardian we are NOT funded by Bill & Melinda Gates, or any other NGO or government – OffGuardian was launched in February 2015 and takes its name from the fact its founders had all been censored on and/or banned from the Guardian’s ‘Comment is Free’ sections,”
published an article on Saturday, June 27, 2020, titled:
We have covered this topic of inaccurate COVID tests previously, of course, and when I first saw this article pop up in my news-feed over the weekend, I made a note to come back and read it in full, expecting that I would find more of the same evidence that we have already published on this topic, that there is no clear evidence that COVID tests are accurate.
Boy was I wrong!
This investigative, highly researched article goes way beyond just pointing out that the evidence is lacking regarding the accuracy of COVID tests currently in the market. They actually prove, beyond a shadow of doubt, that the PCR test which is considered the “gold standard” in COVID testing, is completely “meaningless.”
This must be the most censored information published to date regarding the COVID Plandemic!
The article is credited to two journalists: Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter. Here are their bios:
Torsten Engelbrecht is an award-winning journalist and author from Hamburg, Germany. In 2006 he co-authored Virus-Mania with Dr Klaus Kohnlein, and in 2009 he won the German Alternate Media Award. He has also written for Rubikon, Süddeutsche Zeitung, Financial Times Deutschland and many others.
Konstantin Demeter is a freelance photographer and an independent researcher. Together with the journalist Torsten Engelbrecht he has published articles on the “COVID-19” crisis in the online magazine Rubikon, as well as contributions on the monetary system, geopolitics, and the media in Swiss Italian newspapers.
Their introduction clearly states the results of their investigations:
Lockdowns and hygienic measures around the world are based on numbers of cases and mortality rates created by the so-called SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests used to identify “positive” patients, whereby “positive” is usually equated with “infected.” But looking closely at the facts, the conclusion is that these PCR tests are meaningless as a diagnostic tool to determine an alleged infection by a supposedly new virus called SARS-CoV-2.
The article continues by showing how belief in the PCR COVID test is more akin to a religious belief, than anything based on science.
Unfounded “Test, test, test,…” mantra At the media briefing on COVID-19 on March 16, 2020, the WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said: We have a simple message for all countries: test, test, test.” The message was spread through headlines around the world, for instance by Reuters and the BBC. Still on the 3 of May, the moderator of the heute journal — one of the most important news magazines on German television— was passing the mantra of the corona dogma on to his audience with the admonishing words: Test, test, test—that is the credo at the moment, and it is the only way to really understand how much the coronavirus is spreading.” This indicates that the belief in the validity of the PCR tests is so strong that it equals a religion that tolerates virtually no contradiction. But it is well known that religions are about faith and not about scientific facts. And as Walter Lippmann, the two-time Pulitzer Prize winner and perhaps the most influential journalist of the 20th century said: “Where all think alike, no one thinks very much.”
Next, they give background information about Kary Mullis, the inventor of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology.
So to start, it is very remarkable that Kary Mullis himself, the inventor of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology, did not think alike. His invention got him the Nobel prize in chemistry in 1993. Unfortunately, Mullis passed away last year at the age of 74, but there is no doubt that the biochemist regarded the PCR as inappropriate to detect a viral infection. The reason is that the intended use of the PCR was, and still is, to apply it as a manufacturing technique, being able to replicate DNA sequences millions and billions of times, and not as a diagnostic tool to detect viruses. How declaring virus pandemics based on PCR tests can end in disaster was described by Gina Kolata in her 2007 New York Times article Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t.
Lack of a valid gold standard
After this introductory background, they get into some of the real issues surrounding the PCR test, starting with the fact that this is no valid “gold standard” with which to test the accuracy for the COVID PCR test.
Moreover, it is worth mentioning that the PCR tests used to identify so-called COVID-19 patients presumably infected by what is called SARS-CoV-2 do not have a valid gold standard to compare them with. This is a fundamental point. Tests need to be evaluated to determine their preciseness — strictly speaking their “sensitivity”[1] and “specificity” — by comparison with a “gold standard,” meaning the most accurate method available. As an example, for a pregnancy test the gold standard would be the pregnancy itself. But as Australian infectious diseases specialist Sanjaya Senanayake, for example, stated in an ABC TV interview in an answer to the question “How accurate is the [COVID-19] testing?”: If we had a new test for picking up [the bacterium] golden staph in blood, we’ve already got blood cultures, that’s our gold standard we’ve been using for decades, and we could match this new test against that. But for COVID-19 we don’t have a gold standard test.” Jessica C. Watson from Bristol University confirms this. In her paper “Interpreting a COVID-19 test result”, published recently in The British Medical Journal, she writes that there is a “lack of such a clear-cut ‘gold-standard’ for COVID-19 testing.” But instead of classifying the tests as unsuitable for SARS-CoV-2 detection and COVID-19 diagnosis, or instead of pointing out that only a virus, proven through isolation and purification, can be a solid gold standard, Watson claims in all seriousness that, “pragmatically” COVID-19 diagnosis itself, remarkably including PCR testing itself, “may be the best available ‘gold standard’.” But this is not scientifically sound. Apart from the fact that it is downright absurd to take the PCR test itself as part of the gold standard to evaluate the PCR test, there are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19, as even people such as Thomas Löscher, former head of the Department of Infection and Tropical Medicine at the University of Munich and member of the Federal Association of German Internists, conceded to us[2]. And if there are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19, COVID-19 diagnosis — contrary to Watson’s statement — cannot be suitable for serving as a valid gold standard. In addition, “experts” such as Watson overlook the fact that only virus isolation, i.e. an unequivocal virus proof, can be the gold standard. That is why I asked Watson how COVID-19 diagnosis “may be the best available gold standard,” if there are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19, and also whether the virus itself, that is virus isolation, wouldn’t be the best available/possible gold standard. But she hasn’t answered these questions yet – despite multiple requests. And she has not yet responded to our rapid response post on her article in which we address exactly the same points, either, though she wrote us on June 2nd: “I will try to post a reply later this week when I have a chance.”
No proof for the RNA being of viral origin
Next, they deal with this issue that in order to prove the existence of a new virus, you first have to isolate it to determine its RNA.
Now the question is: What is required first for virus isolation/proof? We need to know where the RNA for which the PCR tests are calibrated comes from. As textbooks (e.g., White/Fenner. Medical Virology, 1986, p. 9) as well as leading virus researchers such as Luc Montagnier or Dominic Dwyer state, particle purification — i.e. the separation of an object from everything else that is not that object, as for instance Nobel laureate Marie Curie purified 100 mg of radium chloride in 1898 by extracting it from tons of pitchblende — is an essential pre-requisite for proving the existence of a virus, and thus to prove that the RNA from the particle in question comes from a new virus. The reason for this is that PCR is extremely sensitive, which means it can detect even the smallest pieces of DNA or RNA — but it cannot determine where these particles came from. That has to be determined beforehand. And because the PCR tests are calibrated for gene sequences (in this case RNA sequences because SARS-CoV-2 is believed to be a RNA virus), we have to know that these gene snippets are part of the looked-for virus. And to know that, correct isolation and purification of the presumed virus has to be executed. Hence, we have asked the science teams of the relevant papers which are referred to in the context of SARS-CoV-2 for proof whether the electron-microscopic shots depicted in their in vitro experiments show purified viruses. But not a single team could answer that question with “yes” — and NB., nobody said purification was not a necessary step. We only got answers like “No, we did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification” (see below). We asked several study authors “Do your electron micrographs show the purified virus?”, they gave the following responses: Study 1: Leo L. M. Poon; Malik Peiris. “Emergence of a novel human coronavirus threatening human health” Nature Medicine, March 2020
Replying Author: Malik Peiris
Date: May 12, 2020
Answer: “The image is the virus budding from an infected cell. It is not purified virus.” Study 2: Myung-Guk Han et al. “Identification of Coronavirus Isolated from a Patient in Korea with COVID-19”, Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives, February 2020
Replying Author: Myung-Guk Han
Date: May 6, 2020
Answer: “We could not estimate the degree of purification because we do not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in cells.” Study 3: Wan Beom Park et al. “Virus Isolation from the First Patient with SARS-CoV-2 in Korea”, Journal of Korean Medical Science, February 24, 2020
Replying Author: Wan Beom Park
Date: March 19, 2020
Answer: “We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification.” Study 4: Na Zhu et al., “A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China”, 2019, New England Journal of Medicine, February 20, 2020
Replying Author: Wenjie Tan
Date: March 18, 2020
Answer: “[We show] an image of sedimented virus particles, not purified ones.” Regarding the mentioned papers it is clear that what is shown in the electron micrographs (EMs) is the end result of the experiment, meaning there is no other result that they could have made EMs from. That is to say, if the authors of these studies concede that their published EMs do not show purified particles, then they definitely do not possess purified particles claimed to be viral. (In this context, it has to be remarked that some researchers use the term “isolation” in their papers, but the procedures described therein do not represent a proper isolation (purification) process. Consequently, in this context the term “isolation” is misused). Thus, the authors of four of the principal, early 2020 papers claiming discovery of a new coronavirus concede they had no proof that the origin of the virus genome was viral-like particles or cellular debris, pure or impure, or particles of any kind. In other words, the existence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA is based on faith, not fact. We have also contacted Dr Charles Calisher, who is a seasoned virologist. In 2001, Science published an “impassioned plea…to the younger generation” from several veteran virologists, among them Calisher, saying that: [modern virus detection methods like] sleek polymerase chain reaction […] tell little or nothing about how a virus multiplies, which animals carry it, [or] how it makes people sick. [It is] like trying to say whether somebody has bad breath by looking at his fingerprint.”[3] And that’s why we asked Dr Calisher whether he knows one single paper in which SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated and finally really purified. His answer: I know of no such a publication. I have kept an eye out for one.”[4] This actually means that one cannot conclude that the RNA gene sequences, which the scientists took from the tissue samples prepared in the mentioned in vitro trials and for which the PCR tests are finally being “calibrated,” belong to a specific virus — in this case SARS-CoV-2. In addition, there is no scientific proof that those RNA sequences are the causative agent of what is called COVID-19. In order to establish a causal connection, one way or the other, i.e. beyond virus isolation and purification, it would have been absolutely necessary to carry out an experiment that satisfies the four Koch’s postulates. But there is no such experiment, as Amory Devereux and Rosemary Frei recently revealed for OffGuardian. The necessity to fulfill these postulates regarding SARS-CoV-2 is demonstrated not least by the fact that attempts have been made to fulfill them. But even researchers claiming they have done it, in reality, did not succeed. One example is a study published in Nature on May 7. This trial, besides other procedures which render the study invalid, did not meet any of the postulates. For instance, the alleged “infected” laboratory mice did not show any relevant clinical symptoms clearly attributable to pneumonia, which according to the third postulate should actually occur if a dangerous and potentially deadly virus was really at work there. And the slight bristles and weight loss, which were observed temporarily in the animals are negligible, not only because they could have been caused by the procedure itself, but also because the weight went back to normal again. Also, no animal died except those they killed to perform the autopsies. And let’s not forget: These experiments should have been done before developing a test, which is not the case. Revealingly, none of the leading German representatives of the official theory about SARS-Cov-2/COVID-19 — the Robert Koch-Institute (RKI), Alexander S. Kekulé (University of Halle), Hartmut Hengel and Ralf Bartenschlager (German Society for Virology), the aforementioned Thomas Löscher, Ulrich Dirnagl (Charité Berlin) or Georg Bornkamm (virologist and professor emeritus at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Munich) — could answer the following question I have sent them: If the particles that are claimed to be to be SARS-CoV-2 have not been purified, how do you want to be sure that the RNA gene sequences of these particles belong to a specific new virus? Particularly, if there are studies showing that substances such as antibiotics that are added to the test tubes in the in vitro experiments carried out for virus detection can “stress” the cell culture in a way that new gene sequences are being formed that were not previously detectable — an aspect that Nobel laureate Barbara McClintock already drew attention to in her Nobel Lecture back in 1983. It should not go unmentioned that we finally got the Charité – the employer of Christian Drosten, Germany’s most influential virologist in respect of COVID-19, advisor to the German government and co-developer of the PCR test which was the first to be “accepted” (not validated!) by the WHO worldwide – to answer questions on the topic. But we didn’t get answers until June 18, 2020, after months of non-response. In the end, we achieved it only with the help of Berlin lawyer Viviane Fischer. Regarding our question “Has the Charité convinced itself that appropriate particle purification was carried out?,” the Charité concedes that they didn’t use purified particles. And although they claim “virologists at the Charité are sure that they are testing for the virus,” in their paper (Corman et al.) they state: RNA was extracted from clinical samples with the MagNA Pure 96 system (Roche, Penzberg, Germany) and from cell culture supernatants with the viral RNA mini kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany),” Which means they just assumed the RNA was viral. Incidentally, the Corman et al. paper, published on January 23, 2020 didn’t even go through a proper peer review process, nor were the procedures outlined therein accompanied by controls — although it is only through these two things that scientific work becomes really solid.
Inaccurate test results
Next, the article deals with what we have reported numerous times here at Health Impact News, that the current COVID tests in the market are notorious for being inaccurate and giving false results.
It is also certain that we cannot know the false positive rate of the PCR tests without widespread testing of people who certainly do not have the virus, proven by a method which is independent of the test (having a solid gold standard). Therefore, it is hardly surprising that there are several papers illustrating irrational test results. For example, already in February the health authority in China’s Guangdong province reported that people have fully recovered from illness blamed on COVID-19, started to test “negative,” and then tested “positive” again. A month later, a paper published in the Journal of Medical Virology showed that 29 out of 610 patients at a hospital in Wuhan had 3 to 6 test results that flipped between “negative”, “positive” and “dubious”. A third example is a study from Singapore in which tests were carried out almost daily on 18 patients and the majority went from “positive” to “negative” back to “positive” at least once, and up to five times in one patient. Even Wang Chen, president of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, conceded in February that the PCR tests are “only 30 to 50 per cent accurate”; while Sin Hang Lee from the Milford Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory sent a letter to the WHO’s coronavirus response team and to Anthony S. Fauci on March 22, 2020, saying that: It has been widely reported in the social media that the RT-qPCR [Reverse Transcriptase quantitative PCR] test kits used to detect SARSCoV-2 RNA in human specimens are generating many false positive results and are not sensitive enough to detect some real positive cases.” In other words, even if we theoretically assume that these PCR tests can really detect a viral infection, the tests would be practically worthless, and would only cause an unfounded scare among the “positive” people tested. This becomes also evident considering the positive predictive value (PPV). The PPV indicates the probability that a person with a positive test result is truly “positive” (ie. has the supposed virus), and it depends on two factors: the prevalence of the virus in the general population and the specificity of the test, that is the percentage of people without disease in whom the test is correctly “negative” (a test with a specificity of 95% incorrectly gives a positive result in 5 out of 100 non-infected people). With the same specificity, the higher the prevalence, the higher the PPV. In this context, on June 12 2020, the journal Deutsches Ärzteblatt published an article in which the PPV has been calculated with three different prevalence scenarios. The results must, of course, be viewed very critically, first because it is not possible to calculate the specificity without a solid gold standard, as outlined, and second because the calculations in the article are based on the specificity determined in the study by Jessica Watson, which is potentially worthless, as also mentioned. But if you abstract from it, assuming that the underlying specificity of 95% is correct and that we know the prevalence, even the mainstream medical journal Deutsches Ärzteblatt reports that the so-called SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests may have “a shockingly low” PPV. In one of the three scenarios, figuring with an assumed prevalence of 3%, the PPV was only 30 percent, which means that 70 percent of the people tested “positive” are not “positive” at all. Yet “they are prescribed quarantine,” as even the Ärzteblatt notes critically. In a second scenario of the journal’s article, a prevalence of rate of 20 percent is assumed. In this case they generate a PPV of 78 percent, meaning that 22 percent of the “positive” tests are false “positives.” That would mean: If we take the around 9 million people who are currently considered “positive” worldwide — supposing that the true “positives” really have a viral infection — we would get almost 2 million false “positives.” All this fits with the fact that the CDC and the FDA, for instance, concede in their files that the so-called “SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests” are not suitable for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. In the “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel“ file from March 30, 2020, for example, it says: Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms” And: This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.” And the FDA admits that: positive results […] do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease.” Remarkably, in the instruction manuals of PCR tests we can also read that they are not intended as a diagnostic test, as for instance in those by Altona Diagnostics and Creative Diagnostics[5]. To quote another one, in the product announcement of the LightMix Modular Assays produced by TIB Molbiol — which were developed using the Corman et al. protocol — and distributed by Roche we can read: These assays are not intended for use as an aid in the diagnosis of coronavirus infection” And: For research use only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.”
Read the full article here.
CONCLUSION: Let’s Finally Call this what it Really is: A HOAX! We are Talking About Crimes Against Humanity!!
Think about the ramifications of what we have just learned from this incredible investigative report that no corporate media source will ever publish. As the corporate media continues to publish stories stating that a second wave is now in place in some parts of the country with a spike in new “COVID cases,” what does that actually mean?
It means NOTHING! Most of these “new cases” are asymptomatic – the people are not even sick!
In some places more people are all of a sudden going to the hospital who are reportedly sick, so what does that mean in terms of COVID “outbreaks” in these new “hot spots” that are prompting more shut downs?
It means NOTHING! All it means is more people are using the hospitals for whatever reasons; either they really are sick from something, or they believe they are sick from something, and the media is TELLING them that this “something” is COVID, of which there is NO ACCURATE TEST AVAILABLE TO PROVE!!
I know I will get emails and comments from people, like I already have, claiming I am wrong, because they know someone who got sick, or they know someone who died, from COVID-19.
No, you do NOT know that! All you “know” is that they got sick, or died, or tested positive, etc. But if you claim that COVID caused this, you just moved from the realm of reality based on experience and data, to the realm of BELIEF where you attribute this to COVID based on what has been told to you.
So now that you have been presented with the FACTS that what is being promoted as the most accurate COVID test in the market, the PCR test, is actually “scientifically meaningless,” will you hold on to your faith in COVID?
What about the COVID Vaccine Bill Gates, the WHO, the U.S. Government, and Big Pharma are all rushing to develop and inject into every single human being on the planet?
Is your faith in COVID strong enough to voluntarily get this new vaccine when it comes out? If COVID is truly a HOAX since there is no way to prove its existence through testing, what should we call the vaccine they are developing for this HOAX?
How about a weapon of mass destruction? (WMD)
We didn’t find WMDs when President Bush led our nation to invade and take over Iraq years ago, but pretty soon we will find WMDs in every pharmacy in the U.S. and around the world.
And President Trump has already promised us that the military will be used to deploy this new vaccine.
The measures that have been taken to fight against the unseen enemy of a “virus” which we now know is a HOAX has caused REAL harm, and death.
I have been reporting for years now how dangerous the flu vaccine is, especially for seniors in assisted living facilities. Every year many die just after getting a flu vaccine that is usually 4X more potent than the regular flu vaccine, and it is NEVER reported in the corporate media.
This year, the causalities in these assisted living facilities were catastrophic and far worse. Why? NOT because of a COVID virus that we now know is a HOAX!
No, these seniors were MURDERED! Most of them are too weak and too frail to fight for themselves, and are dependent on family members and friends who advocate for them and stand up to the bullying tactics used by the Medical System which has little to no regard for their lives.
But because of the lock downs and social isolation, these poor, helpless members of our society were completely cut off from the only ones who could advocate for them, and as a result many of them were murdered.
How long are we going to put up with this America??!!
You better decide fast! Because they’re coming for your kids next….
Resist wearing a mask! Resist being tested! DON’T shut down your business just because they tell you it is “non-essential!”
And resist forced medical procedures like vaccines!!!
We are at WAR, America! And the sooner the sleep-walking public wakes up and starts REFUSING to participate in their own destruction, the sooner we can begin to take our country back.
But to do so, we need to stop fighting each other, and recognize who the REAL enemy is.
Previous articles on COVID testing:
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-07-01--Senator Rand Paul to Dr. Fauci: America’s Children Need to go Back to School Like Other Countries

Dr. Fauci gave a Coronavirus update in Congress yesterday ( June 30 , 2020 ) , appearing before the Senate @ @ @ @ @ and Pensions Committee .
Senator Rand Paul from Kentucky is a member of this committee @ @ @ @ @ strong words for Dr. Fauci regarding how American children are suffering and need to get @ @ @ @ @ countries .
Senator Paul is being ripped apart in the corporate Big Pharma funded media @ @ @ @ @ he actually said for yourself .
Children Have 0.00 % Chance of Dying from COVID @ @ @ @ @ by Social Distancing , Which has its Roots in CIA Torture Techniques

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Dr. Fauci gave a Coronavirus update in Congress yesterday (June 30, 2020), appearing before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee.
Senator Rand Paul from Kentucky is a member of this committee, and he had some strong words for Dr. Fauci regarding how American children are suffering and need to get back to school like other countries. Senator Paul is being ripped apart in the corporate Big Pharma funded media today, so watch what he actually said for yourself.
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-07-01--Doctors in India Rediscover Coconut Oil’s 4000 Year History in Natural Medicine – Including Destroyi

Doctors in India Rediscover Coconut Oil’s 4000 Year History in Natural Medicine – Including Destroying Viruses

The July , 2020 issue of the Journal of The Association of Physicians in India has just published an article titled : Coconut Oil and Immunity : What do we really know about it so far ?
The lead author of the study is Dr. Shashank Joshi , Dean of the Indian College of Physicians ; Consultant Endocrinologist , Lilavati Hospital & Research Centre and Bhatia Hospital , Mumbai , Maharashtra .
It is refreshing to see Indian physicians turn their attention to Ayurvedic natural medicine , and its 4000 year history of recognizing coconut oil as a powerful natural @ @ @ @ @ @ @ medicine and the pharmaceutical industry by several thousand years in India .
The poor people of India have for far too long been the human lab rats for western drugs and vaccines , and is a key country where Bill Gates has promoted and developed new vaccines as part of his population control agenda .
From the Abstract of the study : Coconut oil as health oil was recognized in Ayurvedic medicine almost 4000 years ago .
The same health effects were also attributed to the mother ’ s milk in ancient literature @ @ @ @ @ @ @ common link between these two natural health products – their lipid content .
The medium chain fatty acids and monoglycerides found primarily in coconut oil have miraculous healing power which act as natural antibiotic and also help modulate immunity .
The information discussed in this review explains that coconut oil , either topically applied or ingested , gets broken down to release Lauric Acid and Monolaurin – known anti-microbial agents .
The studies reported in literature are discussed to evaluate the antiviral , antibacterial and antifungal benefits of coconut oil .
Not only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but also these remarkable derivatives have been shown not to cause resistance organisms to appear .
The anti-microbial mechanistic action also helps activate the anti-inflammatory nature of the immune response in human body .
In vitro , animal , and human studies support the potential of coconut oil as effective and safe immune-nutritive active .
New and exciting health and industrial uses of coconut oil and its derivative are possible .
Never before in recent times has the recognition of the positive health effects of coconut oil been stronger .
And never before @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so important to emphasize both need and efficacy of natural products known for their safety proposition .
Immunity has been a buzzword in the current scenario and the demand for modulating immunity with natural means has been so unprecedented and so ubiquitous .
Coconut oil and its value added forms can contribute to a more vigorous and healthy future .
Coconut oil has a long history of fighting viral infections effectively , and while a vaccine was never developed for HIV , studies on coconut oil found it effective for HIV/AIDS over 20 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ return to their Ayurvedic natural medicine roots is very positive .
If they can band together and fight against the global pharmaceutical cartel operated through the World Health Organization , they will have a better chance at resisting the New World Order which wants to reduce the world ’ s population , especially in India .
The USDA Nutritional Guidelines have Demonized Coconut Oil for 50 Years in Spite of Positive Research and Long History Here in the U.S. , I was the first one to import a Virgin Coconut Oil edible oil @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in 2001 .
Only two national suppliers were even selling coconut oil as a dietary oil at the time , and they were both highly refined , mass produced coconut oils .
You could not find coconut oil in stores at all , unless you were visiting an ethnic neighborhood grocery shop from India or the Philippines .
The reason is that since the 1970s , official USDA nutritional advice is that coconut oil is unhealthy , due to the fact that it is mostly saturated fat , wrongly claimed to cause high @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has been thoroughly debunked in the scientific literature over the years , but it remains official USDA policy until today .
Our peer-reviewed research section at CoconutOil.com is still probably the best collection of scientific studies on coconut oil anywhere today .
Back in the early 2000s when Internet searches were still un-censored , we were able to educate Americans on the truth regarding coconut oil and all of its wonderful health benefits .
In 2005 the FDA issued a warning letter against us stating that we were selling “ unapproved drugs ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and customer testimonials on how Virgin Coconut Oil had changed their lives .
As a result , we had to take down all of our research and customer testimonials from the website where we were selling coconut oil , and put it up on a separate website ( which today is CoconutOil.com ) completely separate from our business where we sold coconut oil .
By that time we had probably spent well over $ 1 million dollars in advertising over the course of several years educating American consumers on the lies about saturated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ oil .
Today , one can walk into almost any grocery store and now find coconut oil , although it is still demonized by the USDA , the American Heart Association , and many other Big Pharma aligned government bodies and associations .
The reason why the U.S. Government and Big Pharma will never change their views on coconut oil , is because to admit that the lipid theory of heart disease is wrong , is to admit to harming and killing millions of Americans over the years by artificially lowering their cholesterol @ @ @ @ @ @ @ producer for the pharmaceutical industry all time .
Of course today , all the money is in vaccines , as most of the blockbuster drugs , including cholesterol-lowering statin drugs , have long since lost their patents and can be purchased as cheap generics .
The industry needs fresh new drugs and medical products to maintain their control over humanity , and the most recent example is what they did to Hydroxychloroquine , which resulted in untold deaths of many people , in order to protect Dr. Fauci ’ s new drug , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ $ 3,120.00 .
Comment on this article at CoconutOil.com .
Virgin Coconut Oil : How it has changed people ’ s lives and how it can change yours !
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
The July, 2020 issue of the Journal of The Association of Physicians in India has just published an article titled:
The lead author of the study is Dr. Shashank Joshi, Dean of the Indian College of Physicians; Consultant Endocrinologist, Lilavati Hospital & Research Centre and Bhatia Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra.
It is refreshing to see Indian physicians turn their attention to Ayurvedic natural medicine, and its 4000 year history of recognizing coconut oil as a powerful natural medicine.
Ayurvedic health predates modern western medicine and the pharmaceutical industry by several thousand years in India. The poor people of India have for far too long been the human lab rats for western drugs and vaccines, and is a key country where Bill Gates has promoted and developed new vaccines as part of his population control agenda.
From the Abstract of the study:
Coconut oil as health oil was recognized in Ayurvedic medicine almost 4000 years ago. The same health effects were also attributed to the mother’s milk in ancient literature. Modern research has now found a common link between these two natural health products – their lipid content. The medium chain fatty acids and monoglycerides found primarily in coconut oil have miraculous healing power which act as natural antibiotic and also help modulate immunity. The information discussed in this review explains that coconut oil, either topically applied or ingested, gets broken down to release Lauric Acid and Monolaurin – known anti-microbial agents. The studies reported in literature are discussed to evaluate the antiviral, antibacterial and antifungal benefits of coconut oil. Not only does coconut oil metabolites have antimicrobial activity but also these remarkable derivatives have been shown not to cause resistance organisms to appear. The anti-microbial mechanistic action also helps activate the anti-inflammatory nature of the immune response in human body. In vitro, animal, and human studies support the potential of coconut oil as effective and safe immune-nutritive active. New and exciting health and industrial uses of coconut oil and its derivative are possible. Never before in recent times has the recognition of the positive health effects of coconut oil been stronger. And never before in the history of man is it so important to emphasize both need and efficacy of natural products known for their safety proposition. Immunity has been a buzzword in the current scenario and the demand for modulating immunity with natural means has been so unprecedented and so ubiquitous. Coconut oil and its value added forms can contribute to a more vigorous and healthy future.
Coconut oil has a long history of fighting viral infections effectively, and while a vaccine was never developed for HIV, studies on coconut oil found it effective for HIV/AIDS over 20 years ago.
From the study:
The first clinical trial using coconut oil (45 mL daily) and monolaurin (95% purity, 800 mg daily) against HIV-AIDS was conducted in the Philippines. This study involved 15 HIV patients, aged 22 to 38 years, 5 males and 10 females, for 6 months. There was only one fatality and 11 of the patients showed higher CD4 and CD8 counts after 6 months. In another study, HIV subjects with CD4+ T lymphocyte counts less than 200 cells/microliter were divided into a VCO group (45 mL daily) and control group (no VCO). After 6 weeks, the VCO group showed significantly higher average CD4+ T lymphocyte counts versus control.
Seeing physicians in India return to their Ayurvedic natural medicine roots is very positive. If they can band together and fight against the global pharmaceutical cartel operated through the World Health Organization, they will have a better chance at resisting the New World Order which wants to reduce the world’s population, especially in India.
The USDA Nutritional Guidelines have Demonized Coconut Oil for 50 Years in Spite of Positive Research and Long History
Here in the U.S., I was the first one to import a Virgin Coconut Oil edible oil into the U.S. from the Philippines back in 2001. Only two national suppliers were even selling coconut oil as a dietary oil at the time, and they were both highly refined, mass produced coconut oils.
You could not find coconut oil in stores at all, unless you were visiting an ethnic neighborhood grocery shop from India or the Philippines.
The reason is that since the 1970s, official USDA nutritional advice is that coconut oil is unhealthy, due to the fact that it is mostly saturated fat, wrongly claimed to cause high cholesterol and heart disease.
This dogma has been thoroughly debunked in the scientific literature over the years, but it remains official USDA policy until today.
Our peer-reviewed research section at CoconutOil.com is still probably the best collection of scientific studies on coconut oil anywhere today.
Back in the early 2000s when Internet searches were still un-censored, we were able to educate Americans on the truth regarding coconut oil and all of its wonderful health benefits.
In 2005 the FDA issued a warning letter against us stating that we were selling “unapproved drugs” due to our links to peer-reviewed literature and customer testimonials on how Virgin Coconut Oil had changed their lives.
As a result, we had to take down all of our research and customer testimonials from the website where we were selling coconut oil, and put it up on a separate website (which today is CoconutOil.com) completely separate from our business where we sold coconut oil.
By that time we had probably spent well over $1 million dollars in advertising over the course of several years educating American consumers on the lies about saturated fats, and the truth about coconut oil.
Today, one can walk into almost any grocery store and now find coconut oil, although it is still demonized by the USDA, the American Heart Association, and many other Big Pharma aligned government bodies and associations.
The reason why the U.S. Government and Big Pharma will never change their views on coconut oil, is because to admit that the lipid theory of heart disease is wrong, is to admit to harming and killing millions of Americans over the years by artificially lowering their cholesterol with statin drugs, the biggest income producer for the pharmaceutical industry all time.
Of course today, all the money is in vaccines, as most of the blockbuster drugs, including cholesterol-lowering statin drugs, have long since lost their patents and can be purchased as cheap generics.
The industry needs fresh new drugs and medical products to maintain their control over humanity, and the most recent example is what they did to Hydroxychloroquine, which resulted in untold deaths of many people, in order to protect Dr. Fauci’s new drug, Remdesivir, which has a price of $3,120.00.
Comment on this article at CoconutOil.com.
Virgin Coconut Oil:
How it has changed people’s lives and how it can change yours!
Includes 85 recipes – Free shipping available!
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-07-02--Ghislaine Maxwell Arrested by FBI – Is She the Center of the Epstein Sex Trafficking Enterprise?

Ghislaine Maxwell was arrested by the FBI today on charges that she conspired with Jeffery Epstein to sexually abuse minors .
The six-count indictment in Manhattan federal court alleges that Maxwell helped Epstein groom girls as young as 14 years old , going back as far as 1994 .
Will she have her day in court , or does the same fate await her as Jeffery Epstein ?
Independent investigative reporter Ben Swann brings us this report today , saying that Ghislaine Maxwell may be a more important figure than Epstein himself as she allegedly arranged many of the meetings @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from former President Bill Clinton to Prince Andrew to Bill Gates , in visits to Epstein ’ s private island aboard his “ Lolita Express ” where sexual abuse was allegedly happening among girls as young as 14 years old .
Comment on this article at MedicalKidnap.com .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed Medical Kidnapping : A Threat to Every Family in America T-Shirt See : Medical Kidnapping : A Threat to Every Family in America Today Help spread the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Medical Kidnapping t-shirt !
Support the cause of MedicalKidnap.com , which is part of the Health Impact News network .
Support the cause against Medical Kidnapping by purchasing our new book !
If you know people who are skeptical and can not believe that medical kidnapping happens in the U.S. today , this is the book for them !
Backed with solid references and real life examples , they will not be able to deny the plain evidence before them , and will become better educated on this topic that is destroying the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ $ 49.98 ( for 2 books ) FREE Shipping Available !
Now : $ 19.99 ( for 2 books ) Order here !

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Ghislaine Maxwell was arrested by the FBI today on charges that she conspired with Jeffery Epstein to sexually abuse minors.
The six-count indictment in Manhattan federal court alleges that Maxwell helped Epstein groom girls as young as 14 years old, going back as far as 1994.
“In some instances, Maxwell was present for and participated in the sexual abuse of minor victims,” the indictment says.
Will she have her day in court, or does the same fate await her as Jeffery Epstein?
Independent investigative reporter Ben Swann brings us this report today, saying that Ghislaine Maxwell may be a more important figure than Epstein himself as she allegedly arranged many of the meetings between high profile public figures, ranging from former President Bill Clinton to Prince Andrew to Bill Gates, in visits to Epstein’s private island aboard his “Lolita Express” where sexual abuse was allegedly happening among girls as young as 14 years old.
Comment on this article at MedicalKidnap.com.
See Also:
Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through
Medical Kidnapping: A Threat to Every Family in America T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton!
Order here!
Medical Kidnapping is REAL!
See: Medical Kidnapping: A Threat to Every Family in America Today
Help spread the awareness of Medical Kidnapping by wearing the Medical Kidnapping t-shirt!
Support the cause of MedicalKidnap.com, which is part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!
Support the cause against Medical Kidnapping by purchasing our new book!
If you know people who are skeptical and cannot believe that medical kidnapping happens in the U.S. today, this is the book for them! Backed with solid references and real life examples, they will not be able to deny the plain evidence before them, and will become better educated on this topic that is destroying the American family.
1 Book – 228 pages
Retail: $24.99
FREE Shipping Available!
Now: $14.99
Order here!
2 Books
Retail: $49.98 (for 2 books)
FREE Shipping Available!
Now: $19.99 (for 2 books)
Order here!


healthimpactnews--2020-07-02--“Bill Gates We Are Not Your Lab Rats!” Africans Protest COVID Vaccine Trials Among Poor

Testing on an experimental COVID vaccine began on 2000 “ volunteers ” in South Africa this week , and protesters gathered at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg to protest .
This is the Oxford University ’ s coronavirus vaccine trial from the UK , funded heavily by the World Health Organization and Bill Gates .
The protesters burned their face masks and claimed that the tests were being carried out on poor people who don ’ t understand the risks .
‘ The people chosen as volunteers for the vaccination , they look as if they ’ re @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to understand ’ protest organizer Phapano Phasha said ahead of the event .
‘ We believe they are manipulating the vulnerable ’ , the activist and political commentator added .
( Source . )
Community activist Walter Mashilo said the vaccine should be tested first on members of parliament and ministers ’ children , not on poor people .
“ We are clear , comrades , we don ’ t want this vaccine ( trial ) , ” he said , addressing the crowd .
“ We are not going to follow a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our traditional medicine is not given a chance , ” said Sellwane Mokatsi , 32-year-old compliance officer , who is also part of the traditional healers ’ organisation .
( Source . )
Given the fact that there is not even an accurate test that can identify the COVID-19 virus , African traditional medicine is probably a far better choice of dealing with the sick in Africa .
President Trump was among many heads of nations who earlier this month praised the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation funded GAVI vaccine alliance .
He @ @ @ @ @ @ @ transparency.
” GAVI is funding the Oxford COVID vaccine trial that is currently being tested on poor Africans , and British Prime Minister Boris Johnson gave the concluding remarks at the GAVI global summit held in London earlier this month .
See : British Prime Minister Boris Johnson Surrenders To Bill Gates And The Vaccine Cartel Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist ( kidney doctor ) , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ actually help cure people .
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real , ethical medicine .
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines , no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public .
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children , and even adults .
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Health Impact News network .

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Testing on an experimental COVID vaccine began on 2000 “volunteers” in South Africa this week, and protesters gathered at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg to protest.
This is the Oxford University’s coronavirus vaccine trial from the UK, funded heavily by the World Health Organization and Bill Gates.
The protesters burned their face masks and claimed that the tests were being carried out on poor people who don’t understand the risks.
‘The people chosen as volunteers for the vaccination, they look as if they’re from poor backgrounds, not qualified enough to understand’ protest organizer Phapano Phasha said ahead of the event. ‘We believe they are manipulating the vulnerable’, the activist and political commentator added. (Source.)
Community activist Walter Mashilo said the vaccine should be tested first on members of parliament and ministers’ children, not on poor people.
“We are clear, comrades, we don’t want this vaccine (trial),” he said, addressing the crowd. “We are not going to follow a vaccine because we as healers believe that our traditional medicine is not given a chance,” said Sellwane Mokatsi, 32-year-old compliance officer, who is also part of the traditional healers’ organisation. (Source.)
Given the fact that there is not even an accurate test that can identify the COVID-19 virus, African traditional medicine is probably a far better choice of dealing with the sick in Africa.
President Trump Supports Bill Gates Funded GAVI Vaccine Alliance
President Trump was among many heads of nations who earlier this month praised the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation funded GAVI vaccine alliance. He claimed that GAVI operated with “great transparency.”
GAVI is funding the Oxford COVID vaccine trial that is currently being tested on poor Africans, and British Prime Minister Boris Johnson gave the concluding remarks at the GAVI global summit held in London earlier this month. See:
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.
See Also:
Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Book – The Vaccine Court “The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program” ORDER HERE!
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
Order here!
Make a Statement for Health Freedom!
Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children, and even adults.
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact, part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!


healthimpactnews--2020-07-03--Elon Musk and Tesla Become COVID Vaccine Manufacturers – Will Tesla Owners be Forced to Comply with

Elon Musk and Tesla Become COVID Vaccine Manufacturers – Will Tesla Owners be Forced to Comply with COVID Measures to be Allowed to Drive their own Cars?

Another multi-billionaire Big Tech owner has joined Big Pharma to cash in on the new COVID vaccine development .
FiercePharma announced today that Tesla CEO Elon Musk had signed an agreement with the German vaccine maker CureVac to make portable molecular RNA printers—what Musk called “ RNA microfactories ” —to help produce doses of the German vaccine maker ’ s COVID-19 shot .
German vaccine maker CureVac has lost some shine in the race for a COVID-19 shot after other mRNA-based hopefuls have captured regulators ’ attention .
Even so , CureVac has reportedly snared a big partner to help @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that could turn global interest back in its favor .
Tesla CEO Elon Musk tweeted Thursday that the electric carmaker had signed on with CureVac to make portable molecular RNA printers—what Musk called “ RNA microfactories ” —to help produce doses of the German vaccine maker ’ s COVID-19 shot candidate .
Musk said his company was working on the printers as a “ side project ” and could take on additional partners in the future .
CureVac has previously touted its work on portable “ printers ” for its mRNA-based vaccines , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shots at scale in farflung locations without the standard logistical concerns .
( Source . )
The pharmaceutical sales publication also reported that CureVac was supplied $ 34 million in a three-year grant from the Bill Gates funded Coalition for Emergency Preparedness Innovations ( CEPI ) to develop its proprietary RNA printer prototype to churn out mRNA vaccines .
If you are a Tesla electric car owner concerned about medical tyranny , how does this make you feel ?
It was announced earlier this week that Tesla has now overcome Toyota as the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The Tesla electronic car is one of the most advanced computerized cars ever designed .
The cheaper mass-market Tesla Model 3 does not even have a remote key control , as one has to open the vehicle with a Smart Phone and the Tesla App .
What if Tesla decides you can no longer drive your vehicle if you are not wearing a mask , or participating in contact tracing with the app on your phone , or you don ’ t have the COVID vaccine when it comes out ?
( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ . )
If you don ’ t want to comply , Tesla could literally lock you out of your own car .
Tesla cars also have eight surround cameras that provide 360 degrees of visibility around the car at up to 250 meters of range .
Will Tesla cars now also become spying tools used by the medical authorities to record you while you are driving to see if you are in compliance with COVID medical guidelines , such as wearing masks ?
And since they are connected to the Internet through your @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 5G now allow electronic cars such as Teslas to become weapons in 5G technology for those who don ’ t comply ?
This may sound like some kind of science fiction dystopian future , but such things are happening right now , today , at break-neck speed .
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist ( kidney doctor ) , Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually @ @ @ @ @ @ @ she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real , ethical medicine .
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines , no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public .
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children , and even adults .
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact , part of the @ @ @ @ @

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Another multi-billionaire Big Tech owner has joined Big Pharma to cash in on the new COVID vaccine development.
FiercePharma announced today that Tesla CEO Elon Musk had signed an agreement with the German vaccine maker CureVac to make portable molecular RNA printers—what Musk called “RNA microfactories”—to help produce doses of the German vaccine maker’s COVID-19 shot.
German vaccine maker CureVac has lost some shine in the race for a COVID-19 shot after other mRNA-based hopefuls have captured regulators’ attention. Even so, CureVac has reportedly snared a big partner to help build its game-changing RNA “printers” that could turn global interest back in its favor. Tesla CEO Elon Musk tweeted Thursday that the electric carmaker had signed on with CureVac to make portable molecular RNA printers—what Musk called “RNA microfactories”—to help produce doses of the German vaccine maker’s COVID-19 shot candidate. Musk said his company was working on the printers as a “side project” and could take on additional partners in the future. CureVac has previously touted its work on portable “printers” for its mRNA-based vaccines, which would allow the company to produce shots at scale in farflung locations without the standard logistical concerns. (Source.)
The pharmaceutical sales publication also reported that CureVac was supplied $34 million in a three-year grant from the Bill Gates funded Coalition for Emergency Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) to develop its proprietary RNA printer prototype to churn out mRNA vaccines.
If you are a Tesla electric car owner concerned about medical tyranny, how does this make you feel?
It was announced earlier this week that Tesla has now overcome Toyota as the most valuable car manufacturer in the world.
The Tesla electronic car is one of the most advanced computerized cars ever designed. The cheaper mass-market Tesla Model 3 does not even have a remote key control, as one has to open the vehicle with a Smart Phone and the Tesla App.
What if Tesla decides you can no longer drive your vehicle if you are not wearing a mask, or participating in contact tracing with the app on your phone, or you don’t have the COVID vaccine when it comes out? (Especially the one he is investing in.)
If you don’t want to comply, Tesla could literally lock you out of your own car.
Tesla cars also have eight surround cameras that provide 360 degrees of visibility around the car at up to 250 meters of range. Will Tesla cars now also become spying tools used by the medical authorities to record you while you are driving to see if you are in compliance with COVID medical guidelines, such as wearing masks?
And since they are connected to the Internet through your cell phone, will the implementation of 5G now allow electronic cars such as Teslas to become weapons in 5G technology for those who don’t comply?
This may sound like some kind of science fiction dystopian future, but such things are happening right now, today, at break-neck speed.
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.
See Also:
Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Book – The Vaccine Court “The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program” ORDER HERE!
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
Order here!
Make a Statement for Health Freedom!
Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children, and even adults.
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact, part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!


healthimpactnews--2020-07-03--Independence Day Under Dictatorship

Independence Day Under Dictatorship

This July 4th , much of the United States finds itself under various levels of dictatorial orders from renegade governors @ @ @ @ @ officials .
The US is under rule by decree , not by rule of law @ @ @ @ @ list of grievances the Colonists had against King George , it looks like most of @ @ @ @ @ then some – by our current system of government .
Can we regain our independence @ @ @ @ @ have a moral that will respond in a positive way that life is precious , @ @ @ @ @ s life is as precious as yours.
” Dr. Ron Paul is a former physician @ @ @ @ @ was a U.S .
Congressman from Texas for over 20 years .
He ran for @ @ @ @ @ in 1988 under the Libertarian Party , and again in 2008 and 2012 under the @ @ @

by Dr. Ron Paul
Liberty Report
This July 4th, much of the United States finds itself under various levels of dictatorial orders from renegade governors, county, and local officials. The US is under rule by decree, not by rule of law.
Looking at the original list of grievances the Colonists had against King George, it looks like most of them are met – and then some – by our current system of government.
Can we regain our independence?
“You have to have a moral people that will respond in a positive way that life is precious, and that somebody else’s life is as precious as yours.”
Dr. Ron Paul is a former physician and flight surgeon, and was a U.S. Congressman from Texas for over 20 years. He ran for President of the United States in 1988 under the Libertarian Party, and again in 2008 and 2012 under the Republican Party.