healthimpactnews--2020-06-09--Parents in Boston Sue to Get Visitation Rights Back for their Children that were Cut Off Because of

Parents in Boston Sue to Get Visitation Rights Back for their Children that were Cut Off Because of the Plandemic

All across the nation parents have been cut off from their children who are in Foster Care , due to the State reactions to the Plandemic .
This is a very serious issue , since study after study has proven throughout the years that children are in far more danger in Foster Care than they are in their homes with their parents , even when that is a “ troubled home.
” The Foster Care system is the # 1 pipeline for child sex trafficking , for example , and far more child sex abuse happens in Foster Care , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Department Report : U.S. # 1 in Sex Trafficking – 60 % American Child Sex Slaves Come Out of Foster Care Foster Care Continues to be Child Sex Trafficking Pipeline in 2020 – How Do We Stop It ?
Parents in Boston have decided to take action , and are suing Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker , Marylou Sudders , the Secretary of the Executive Office of Health and Human Services , and Linda Spears , the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Children and Families , for refusing them to have access to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reunified with them .
According to the Complaint : This complaint is brought by families in the foster care system who are losing time together – time that they will never get back – due to a recently imposed Department of Children and Families ( department ) policy terminating visitation .
In March 2020 , in response to risks presented by the COVID-19 pandemic , the department ended visitation for most children in its custody and their parents .
This near-total prohibition on visitation causes severe harm to children because it is unnecessarily @ @ @ @ @ @ @ under prevailing public health guidelines , and violates the law .
According to the suit , one plaintiff — an unnamed mother of a 3-month-old — has not been physically present with the baby since March 9 .
Lauren Russell , an attorney with the Committee for Public Counsel Services , the state ’ s public defender office , is representing the families .
“ Visitation means in-person contact , ” according to the complaint filed by Lauren Russell , an attorney with the Committee for Public Counsel Services , the state ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ representing the plaintiffs .
By providing only “ video conference visitation , ” it mounts to a termination of visitation , which requires a court order , according to the complaint , and is “ unnecessarily delaying families ’ reunification , is unwarranted under prevailing public health guidelines , and violates the law.
” For one Westport father and his 1½-year-old daughter , their twice weekly video chats may only last 10 minutes before the toddler ’ s attention to the call begins to wane , the complaint states .
A Taunton father @ @ @ @ @ @ @ care , had been granted two hours of visitation time a week , and DCF “ intended ” to return her to his custody this spring , according to the complaint .
But he hasn ’ t since her in person since March 5 , and their time together has been reduced to one-hour “ virtual contact ” each week .
When a Pittsfield father sought to restart visits with his 10-year-old son and 12-year-old daughter , a DCF attorney said the department was not “ providing in-person visitation at this time , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there was a broader prohibition beyond what Spears had initially indicated .
“ I do not know when in-person visits will resume , ” the attorney wrote , according to the complaint .
As part of their lawsuit , the plaintiffs included a letter that federal health officials released in March .
It said the federal Children ’ s Bureau “ discourages the issuance of blanket orders that are not specific to each child and family.
” ( Source . )
Technology is the New Mechanism of Inequality Elizabeth Brico , writing for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ minority families are suffering the most during the current family visitation restrictions happening nationwide due to the Plandemic response , as contact is only allowed digitally , making it more difficult for those with limited technology access .
On the morning of May 14 , advocates and supporters from around the country dialed into a virtual hearing taking place in Illinois .
The argument was over a blanket decision made by the state department of human services banning in-person supervised visitation between parents and children in foster care .
Many of these spectators @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no direct ties to the plaintiffs or the state .
Although the findings from this hearing only directly impact Illinois , the issue at hand is one that affects parents with child welfare involvement across the United States .
It is an issue that is causing separated families immense , ongoing strife , and has the potential to inflict irreparable long-term damage to parents ’ cases .
It is also spotlighting and deepening the racial , ethnic , and class divides that have long plagued the U.S. child welfare system .
Child welfare @ @ @ @ @ @ @ jurisdictional levels , which means there ’ s room for variance between the ways in which states and counties respond to the pandemic .
But in the face of COVID-19 , agencies around the nation have made decisions similar to the contested Illinois ban .
Many states , such as Idaho , Connecticut , Nevada , and others have cut-off in-person supervised visitations altogether .
Others , like New York and California , are making decisions on a case-by-case basis , though anecdotal reports from these states show decisions that are heavily weighted @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as Louisiana , continue to allow in-person supervised visits on the books , but no longer have means to facilitate them after shifting to remote operations .
Eliana , a New York City mother who asked that her real name not be used in this story , described her tele-visits with her 19-month-old toddler as “ really hard ” and expressed particular confusion over the fact that her child continues to see an out-of-home babysitter and attend daycare three times a week , but can no longer visit with her in-person .
“ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on puppet shows , read books to her , sing songs , try to get her to laugh—but any little distraction gets her eyes off that screen .
If the foster mother walks through , she sees her and starts crying and wants to be picked up , ” says Eliana about the remote visits , which often can not go on for the full hour she ’ s allotted due to her toddler ’ s limited attention span .
For other families , the situation is worsened by lack of access to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , whether that ’ s video-enabled devices , a strong internet connection , or a data or phone minute plan that can handle frequent , long calls .
It is a burden shouldered solely by poor families , and disproportionately by families of color .
For example , a survey conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics found that 23 % of American Indian/Alaskan Native student households had either no internet or only dial-up .
Black and Latinx student households followed at 19 % and 17 % , respectively .
Black and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have access to cell phones and smart devices .
Compounding this , Native American , Black , and Latinx families are also overrepresented in the child welfare system .
The intersection of these two sets of disparities during the COVID-19 pandemic is creating a perfect storm of inequities that is driving poor families of color even further apart , and making the path to reunification much more difficult .
“ [ Technology ] is the new mechanism of inequality , ” says Blanca Gordo , who previously worked as senior researcher of artificial @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and is a department member of the Institute for the Study of Societal Issues at the University of California-Berkeley .
She argues that the integration of technology into virtually all essential operations , without concurrently making that technology affordable and available to all , has deepened historical inequities .
( Read the full article . )
If you have not yet read my article on who is really behind all of these planned events happening in our society today to usher in a “ New World Order , ” you need to read @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of this is happening today , especially if you are a parent with young children .
Because this very real enemy wants your children , and the plans for the New World Order include eliminating parenthood and replacing the State as the parent .
Unmasking Who is Behind the Plandemic and Rioting to Usher in the New World Order Comment on this article at MedicalKidnap.com .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed Medical Kidnapping : A Threat to Every Family in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ A Threat to Every Family in America Today Help spread the awareness of Medical Kidnapping by wearing the Medical Kidnapping t-shirt !
Support the cause of MedicalKidnap.com , which is part of the Health Impact News network .
Support the cause against Medical Kidnapping by purchasing our new book !
If you know people who are skeptical and can not believe that medical kidnapping happens in the U.S. today , this is the book for them !
Backed with solid references and real life examples , they will not be able to deny @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will become better educated on this topic that is destroying the American family .
2 Books Retail : $ 49.98 ( for 2 books ) FREE Shipping Available !
Now : $ 19.99 ( for 2 books ) Order here !

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
All across the nation parents have been cut off from their children who are in Foster Care, due to the State reactions to the Plandemic.
This is a very serious issue, since study after study has proven throughout the years that children are in far more danger in Foster Care than they are in their homes with their parents, even when that is a “troubled home.”
The Foster Care system is the #1 pipeline for child sex trafficking, for example, and far more child sex abuse happens in Foster Care, than it does anywhere else.
Parents in Boston have decided to take action, and are suing Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker, Marylou Sudders, the Secretary of the Executive Office of Health and Human Services, and Linda Spears, the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Children and Families, for refusing them to have access to their children and the ability to be reunified with them.
According to the Complaint:
This complaint is brought by families in the foster care system who are losing time together – time that they will never get back – due to a recently imposed Department of Children and Families (department) policy terminating visitation. In March 2020, in response to risks presented by the COVID-19 pandemic, the department ended visitation for most children in its custody and their parents. This near-total prohibition on visitation causes severe harm to children because it is unnecessarily delaying families’ reunification, is unwarranted under prevailing public health guidelines, and violates the law.
According to the suit, one plaintiff — an unnamed mother of a 3-month-old — has not been physically present with the baby since March 9.
“It’s been very difficult for bonding to occur over video,” the suit says. It adds that the mother has been engaged in a “family action plan,” and that “the goal is for the baby to be reunified” with the mother.
Lauren Russell, an attorney with the Committee for Public Counsel Services, the state’s public defender office, is representing the families.
The Boston Globe reports:
“Visitation means in-person contact,” according to the complaint filed by Lauren Russell, an attorney with the Committee for Public Counsel Services, the state’s public defender office, which is representing the plaintiffs. By providing only “video conference visitation,” it mounts to a termination of visitation, which requires a court order, according to the complaint, and is “unnecessarily delaying families’ reunification, is unwarranted under prevailing public health guidelines, and violates the law.” For one Westport father and his 1½-year-old daughter, their twice weekly video chats may only last 10 minutes before the toddler’s attention to the call begins to wane, the complaint states. A Taunton father, whose 3-year-old daughter is in foster care, had been granted two hours of visitation time a week, and DCF “intended” to return her to his custody this spring, according to the complaint. But he hasn’t since her in person since March 5, and their time together has been reduced to one-hour “virtual contact” each week. When a Pittsfield father sought to restart visits with his 10-year-old son and 12-year-old daughter, a DCF attorney said the department was not “providing in-person visitation at this time,” according to the lawsuit — suggesting there was a broader prohibition beyond what Spears had initially indicated. “I do not know when in-person visits will resume,” the attorney wrote, according to the complaint. As part of their lawsuit, the plaintiffs included a letter that federal health officials released in March. It said the federal Children’s Bureau “discourages the issuance of blanket orders that are not specific to each child and family.” (Source.)
Technology is the New Mechanism of Inequality
Elizabeth Brico, writing for the publication Prism, documents how poor minority families are suffering the most during the current family visitation restrictions happening nationwide due to the Plandemic response, as contact is only allowed digitally, making it more difficult for those with limited technology access.
On the morning of May 14, advocates and supporters from around the country dialed into a virtual hearing taking place in Illinois. The argument was over a blanket decision made by the state department of human services banning in-person supervised visitation between parents and children in foster care. Many of these spectators were watching from outside Illinois, having no direct ties to the plaintiffs or the state. Although the findings from this hearing only directly impact Illinois, the issue at hand is one that affects parents with child welfare involvement across the United States. It is an issue that is causing separated families immense, ongoing strife, and has the potential to inflict irreparable long-term damage to parents’ cases. It is also spotlighting and deepening the racial, ethnic, and class divides that have long plagued the U.S. child welfare system. Child welfare agencies are mostly governed at state and jurisdictional levels, which means there’s room for variance between the ways in which states and counties respond to the pandemic. But in the face of COVID-19, agencies around the nation have made decisions similar to the contested Illinois ban. Many states, such as Idaho, Connecticut, Nevada, and others have cut-off in-person supervised visitations altogether. Others, like New York and California, are making decisions on a case-by-case basis, though anecdotal reports from these states show decisions that are heavily weighted against in-person visits. Some, such as Louisiana, continue to allow in-person supervised visits on the books, but no longer have means to facilitate them after shifting to remote operations. Eliana, a New York City mother who asked that her real name not be used in this story, described her tele-visits with her 19-month-old toddler as “really hard” and expressed particular confusion over the fact that her child continues to see an out-of-home babysitter and attend daycare three times a week, but can no longer visit with her in-person. “I try to do what I can—put on puppet shows, read books to her, sing songs, try to get her to laugh—but any little distraction gets her eyes off that screen. If the foster mother walks through, she sees her and starts crying and wants to be picked up,” says Eliana about the remote visits, which often cannot go on for the full hour she’s allotted due to her toddler’s limited attention span. For other families, the situation is worsened by lack of access to the technology needed to conduct remote visits, whether that’s video-enabled devices, a strong internet connection, or a data or phone minute plan that can handle frequent, long calls. It is a burden shouldered solely by poor families, and disproportionately by families of color. For example, a survey conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics found that 23% of American Indian/Alaskan Native student households had either no internet or only dial-up. Black and Latinx student households followed at 19% and 17%, respectively. Black and Latinx people are also less likely to have access to cell phones and smart devices. Compounding this, Native American, Black, and Latinx families are also overrepresented in the child welfare system. The intersection of these two sets of disparities during the COVID-19 pandemic is creating a perfect storm of inequities that is driving poor families of color even further apart, and making the path to reunification much more difficult. “[Technology] is the new mechanism of inequality,” says Blanca Gordo, who previously worked as senior researcher of artificial intelligence at the International Computer Science Institute and is a department member of the Institute for the Study of Societal Issues at the University of California-Berkeley. She argues that the integration of technology into virtually all essential operations, without concurrently making that technology affordable and available to all, has deepened historical inequities. (Read the full article.)
If you have not yet read my article on who is really behind all of these planned events happening in our society today to usher in a “New World Order,” you need to read it to understand what and why all of this is happening today, especially if you are a parent with young children. Because this very real enemy wants your children, and the plans for the New World Order include eliminating parenthood and replacing the State as the parent.
Comment on this article at MedicalKidnap.com.
See Also:
Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through
Medical Kidnapping: A Threat to Every Family in America T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton!
Order here!
Medical Kidnapping is REAL!
See: Medical Kidnapping: A Threat to Every Family in America Today
Help spread the awareness of Medical Kidnapping by wearing the Medical Kidnapping t-shirt!
Support the cause of MedicalKidnap.com, which is part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!
Support the cause against Medical Kidnapping by purchasing our new book!
If you know people who are skeptical and cannot believe that medical kidnapping happens in the U.S. today, this is the book for them! Backed with solid references and real life examples, they will not be able to deny the plain evidence before them, and will become better educated on this topic that is destroying the American family.
1 Book – 228 pages
Retail: $24.99
FREE Shipping Available!
Now: $14.99
Order here!
2 Books
Retail: $49.98 (for 2 books)
FREE Shipping Available!
Now: $19.99 (for 2 books)
Order here!


healthimpactnews--2020-06-11--New WHO Guidelines for Face Masks Admit No Known Medical Benefits – Psychological Brain Washing

The World Health Organization released new guidelines for using masks this past week .
Advice on the use of masks in the context of COVID-19 “ The widespread use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not yet supported by high quality or direct scientific evidence and there are potential benefits and harms to consider…the use of a mask alone is insufficient to provide an adequate level of protection.
” But you should still keep wearing one for these non-medical reasons : So there you go .
It is all a big “ social experiment ” to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ voluntarily comply , and has nothing to do with health .
They actually admit this now , and do not even deny it .
But wait , it gets even better !
Doctors now encourage people to wear a mask when having sex !
( You can ’ t make this stuff up !
! )
Wearing a face mask during sex can reduce COVID-19 transmission , say doctors Are There Enough Free-Thinking Americans Left to Resist the New World Order Take Over ?
Resisting the New World Order : Face Mask Shaming @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a Doctor Speaks Out AGAINST Face Masks Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
The World Health Organization released new guidelines for using masks this past week.
The document is called:
Some highlights:
“The widespread use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not yet supported by high quality or direct scientific evidence and there are potential benefits and harms to consider…the use of a mask alone is insufficient to provide an adequate level of protection.”
But you should still keep wearing one for these non-medical reasons:
The likely advantages of the use of masks by healthy people in the general public include: Reduced potential stigmatization of individuals wearing masks to prevent infecting others (source control) or of people caring for COVID-19 patients in non-clinical settings.
Making people feel they can play a role in contributing to stopping spread of the virus.
Reminding people to be compliant with other measures (e.g., hand hygiene, not touching nose and mouth). However, this can also have the reverse effect.
Potential social and economic benefits. Amidst the global shortage of surgical masks and PPE, encouraging the public to create their own fabric masks may promote individual enterprise and community integration.
Moreover, the production of non-medical masks may offer a source of income for those able to manufacture masks within their communities.
Fabric masks can also be a form of cultural expression, encouraging public acceptance of protection measures in general.
Evaluate the impact (positive, neutral or negative) of using masks in the general population (including behavioral and social sciences).
So there you go. It is all a big “social experiment” to see if they can get you to voluntarily comply, and has nothing to do with health. They actually admit this now, and do not even deny it.
But wait, it gets even better!
Doctors now encourage people to wear a mask when having sex! (You can’t make this stuff up!!)
See Also:
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-06-11--As COVID Vaccines Head into Phase 3 Trials Big Pharma Prepares for Increase in Flu Vaccines for Fall

An article published in FiercePharma , a pharmaceutical marketing trade publication , is reporting that the National Institute of Health is preparing to test experimental COVID vaccines entering into phase 3 of development on over 90,000 people this summer .
The three drug companies entering phase 3 trials are Moderna , AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson .
As leading coronavirus vaccines make their way through early stages of human testing , the NIH is plotting much larger efficacy studies this summer .
U.S. researchers plan to run phase 3 trials of vaccines from Moderna , AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Street Journal reports .
The NIH intends to start a phase 3 trial of Moderna ’ s vaccine in July , followed by an August trial of AstraZeneca ’ s vaccine and a September study of Johnson & Johnson ’ s shot , a U.S. government researcher told the newspaper .
All three of the shots are based on brand-new technologies , and they ’ re all reportedly among finalists in the Operation Warp Speed program .
Former FDA chief Scott Gottlieb has publicly questioned the picks , pointing out the team ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ government-funded phase 3 studies will enroll about 30,000 people each , testing the vaccines against placebo in places where the virus is circulating , WSJ reports .
The aim is to see whether the candidates can protect vaccinated individuals against infection .
Aside from the NIH plans , Pfizer could start a phase 3 trial as early as next month , a source told the WSJ .
Down the road , the NIH could launch studies of other vaccines , John Mascola , the head of NIAID ’ s vaccine research center , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ head of the NIAID , said at BIO ’ s digital conference Tuesday he expects “ more than one ” vaccine to succeed .
( Source . )
Given the recent bad publicity Moderna received from the small sample size tested so far ( see : COVID Experimental Vaccine Victim Claims “ Sickest in His Life ” after Being Injected with Experimental Vaccine ) , one has to wonder if the drug companies will be transparent in releasing the results of these trials , both negative and any positive outcomes .
Given the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up the tab on these trials , the companies have a legal and moral obligation to be transparent in the results of these trials .
More Flu Shots – More Ways to Get it Fall 2020 Meanwhile , flu vaccine manufacturers are already preparing for this fall ’ s flu season and planning on manufacturing more flu vaccines than they did last year .
Manufacturers distributed about 170 million flu vaccine doses to the U.S. last year .
This year , they ’ re aiming to increase that by about 20 million , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s North America head of commercial operations , told FiercePharma .
Vaccine makers are already producing their doses , with plans to start shipping later this summer .
Sanofi is getting ready to ship up to 80 million flu vaccine doses this year , she said—an increase from 70 million last year .
Seqirus shipped 52 million doses last year , and it ’ s planning to increase that number by about 10 % for the coming season , Ross said .
GlaxoSmithKline , the third major flu vaccine player , shipped @ @ @ @ @ @ @ planning to ship 50 million this year , a spokesman said .
According to FiercePharma , the manufacturers are looking at “ creative ways ” of injecting more people , by setting up mobile clinics in parking lots , parks or community centers .
I would not be surprised to see them giving them out in churches and other religious institutions as well .
What changes can Americans expect changes to routine flu vaccinations this year ?
They could include clinics set up in parking lots , parks or community centers to allow @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , flu vaccinations could start earlier and go later than usual , Ross said .
Experts want to do whatever it takes to make sure flu vaccines aren ’ t wasted , O ’ Hara said .
During the H1N1 pandemic , many doses were eventually discarded , she said .
“ We ’ re really trying to prevent that from happening , ” she said .
( Source . )
Big Pharma Spends on Advertising on Social Media to Push Their Drugs As we have reported many times here at Health Impact @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is negative is quickly labeled as “ Fake News ” on the Social Media giants such as Facebook , Twitter , and Pinterest , among others .
The same is true for any natural treatments for COVID-19 .
An article published this week by Beth Snyder Bulik in FiercePharma reveals that Big Pharma invests heavily in tracking social media conversations about COVID treatments and other drugs , and also in advertising and using “ influencers ” to get their message out .
There can be no doubt now that Social Media companies work @ @ @ @ @ @ @ natural treatments that would compete with them .
Titled “ As COVID-19 social media fatigue sets in , pharma begins to restart other health conversations , ” Bulik reveals that pharmaceutical companies have social media managers who monitor online conversations , and then use that same media to direct these conversations .
Evoke Kyne and its new social media chief Kate Callan have been tracking social media conversations throughout the crisis , and the latest numbers show a 65 % drop in global conversations around COVID-19 , from 204 million weekly mentions in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ May .
The mood around those conversations is also shifting away from disgust , which is still the top feeling at 34 % , toward feelings such as anticipation , now at trending at 15 % of the conversation mood .
Social media strategy suggestions are changing , too .
When the health crisis and lockdowns initially began , Evoke Kyne counseled clients that were not directly involved in treatments or vaccines to slow or stop posting on social media .
Now that consumers are signaling readiness for other health topics , Evoke @ @ @ @ @ @ @ draw up new social plans for pharma .
The group is analyzing conversations that reflect patients ’ needs or problems and then working to create solutions .
( Source . )
With the decreasing popularity of the “ mainstream ” corporate media , it is hardly surprising that Big Pharma is now trying to control all the conversations about vaccines and other drugs on Social Media now .
In an article last month ( May , 2020 ) , “ The top pharma companies in social media , ” Beth Snyder Bulik addressed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this article at VaccineImpact.com

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
An article published in FiercePharma, a pharmaceutical marketing trade publication, is reporting that the National Institute of Health is preparing to test experimental COVID vaccines entering into phase 3 of development on over 90,000 people this summer.
The three drug companies entering phase 3 trials are Moderna, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson.
As leading coronavirus vaccines make their way through early stages of human testing, the NIH is plotting much larger efficacy studies this summer. U.S. researchers plan to run phase 3 trials of vaccines from Moderna, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson in the coming months, the Wall Street Journal reports. The NIH intends to start a phase 3 trial of Moderna’s vaccine in July, followed by an August trial of AstraZeneca’s vaccine and a September study of Johnson & Johnson’s shot, a U.S. government researcher told the newspaper. All three of the shots are based on brand-new technologies, and they’re all reportedly among finalists in the Operation Warp Speed program. Former FDA chief Scott Gottlieb has publicly questioned the picks, pointing out the team’s reliance on new technologies. The government-funded phase 3 studies will enroll about 30,000 people each, testing the vaccines against placebo in places where the virus is circulating, WSJ reports. The aim is to see whether the candidates can protect vaccinated individuals against infection. Aside from the NIH plans, Pfizer could start a phase 3 trial as early as next month, a source told the WSJ. Down the road, the NIH could launch studies of other vaccines, John Mascola, the head of NIAID’s vaccine research center, told the publication. Anthony Fauci, head of the NIAID, said at BIO’s digital conference Tuesday he expects “more than one” vaccine to succeed. (Source.)
Given the recent bad publicity Moderna received from the small sample size tested so far (see: COVID Experimental Vaccine Victim Claims “Sickest in His Life” after Being Injected with Experimental Vaccine), one has to wonder if the drug companies will be transparent in releasing the results of these trials, both negative and any positive outcomes.
Given the fact that the U.S. taxpayers are picking up the tab on these trials, the companies have a legal and moral obligation to be transparent in the results of these trials.
More Flu Shots – More Ways to Get it Fall 2020
Meanwhile, flu vaccine manufacturers are already preparing for this fall’s flu season and planning on manufacturing more flu vaccines than they did last year.
Manufacturers distributed about 170 million flu vaccine doses to the U.S. last year. This year, they’re aiming to increase that by about 20 million, Elaine O’Hara, Sanofi Pasteur’s North America head of commercial operations, told FiercePharma. Vaccine makers are already producing their doses, with plans to start shipping later this summer. Sanofi is getting ready to ship up to 80 million flu vaccine doses this year, she said—an increase from 70 million last year. Seqirus shipped 52 million doses last year, and it’s planning to increase that number by about 10% for the coming season, Ross said. GlaxoSmithKline, the third major flu vaccine player, shipped 46 million doses last year and is planning to ship 50 million this year, a spokesman said.
According to FiercePharma, the manufacturers are looking at “creative ways” of injecting more people, by setting up mobile clinics in parking lots, parks or community centers. I would not be surprised to see them giving them out in churches and other religious institutions as well.
What changes can Americans expect changes to routine flu vaccinations this year? They could include clinics set up in parking lots, parks or community centers to allow for appropriate distancing between people. Plus, flu vaccinations could start earlier and go later than usual, Ross said. Experts want to do whatever it takes to make sure flu vaccines aren’t wasted, O’Hara said. During the H1N1 pandemic, many doses were eventually discarded, she said. “We’re really trying to prevent that from happening,” she said. (Source.)
Big Pharma Spends on Advertising on Social Media to Push Their Drugs
As we have reported many times here at Health Impact News, anything published on vaccines that is negative is quickly labeled as “Fake News” on the Social Media giants such as Facebook, Twitter, and Pinterest, among others. The same is true for any natural treatments for COVID-19.
An article published this week by Beth Snyder Bulik in FiercePharma reveals that Big Pharma invests heavily in tracking social media conversations about COVID treatments and other drugs, and also in advertising and using “influencers” to get their message out.
There can be no doubt now that Social Media companies work with Big Pharma while suppressing any other natural treatments that would compete with them.
Titled “As COVID-19 social media fatigue sets in, pharma begins to restart other health conversations,” Bulik reveals that pharmaceutical companies have social media managers who monitor online conversations, and then use that same media to direct these conversations.
Evoke Kyne and its new social media chief Kate Callan have been tracking social media conversations throughout the crisis, and the latest numbers show a 65% drop in global conversations around COVID-19, from 204 million weekly mentions in mid-March to just 71 million in late May. The mood around those conversations is also shifting away from disgust, which is still the top feeling at 34%, toward feelings such as anticipation, now at trending at 15% of the conversation mood. Social media strategy suggestions are changing, too. When the health crisis and lockdowns initially began, Evoke Kyne counseled clients that were not directly involved in treatments or vaccines to slow or stop posting on social media. Now that consumers are signaling readiness for other health topics, Evoke will continue to tap social listening to draw up new social plans for pharma. The group is analyzing conversations that reflect patients’ needs or problems and then working to create solutions. (Source.)
With the decreasing popularity of the “mainstream” corporate media, it is hardly surprising that Big Pharma is now trying to control all the conversations about vaccines and other drugs on Social Media now.
In an article last month (May, 2020), “The top pharma companies in social media, ” Beth Snyder Bulik addressed this shift in strategies:
Social media is no longer just a numbers game for pharma companies. Counting followers, tallying likes or tracking shares was a good start, but numbers alone can’t tell if business goals are met. That’s especially true in the current era of paid promotions, where numbers can be artificially inflated. Pharma companies today need to figure out how social media helps them reach the right influencers and key opinion leaders, drive traffic to websites or change perceptions of the products or company. Pharma companies have advanced over the past few years from experimenting with social media channels to adopting robust social strategies linked across media channels. Social media is now the “shopfront window of the industry,” as Ogilvy Health describes it, where employees, media, healthcare professionals and patients can meet and assess pharma companies directly. (Full article here.)
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com


healthimpactnews--2020-06-12--Full Steam Ahead: FCC Chairman Dismisses Pentagon, DoT, NOAA, and Energy Dept Opposition to 5G

The Federal Communications Commission ( FCC ) is supposed to protect Americans by regulating the telecom industry .
Unfortunately , it never seems to work out that way on 5G or anything else .
Opposition to 5G has been issued by many respected American government agencies including the U.S. Navy , NOAA , NASA , the Department of Defense , and more .
Congress members have also asked that installation be slowed down during the pandemic .
The FCC says no .
Despite major pushback from the Pentagon , Department of Transportation ( DoT ) , the National Oceanic and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Energy Department , Ajit Pai continues to charge forward with plans to speed the rollout of 5G .
“ NOAA…said the FCC ’ s push to reallocate some spectrum would set back satellite-assisted weather forecasting decades .
The Transportation Department warned about road safety when a patch of airwaves set aside for driverless cars was reassigned .
The Energy Department opposed taking spectrum used by the power companies .
Perhaps most memorably , the Defense Department raised alarms about the FCC ’ s April 20 approval of a mobile broadband network , saying @ @ @ @ @ @ @ civilian GPS.
” In his quest to expand U.S. mobile broadband capacity , Federal Communications CommissionChairman Ajit Pai hasn ’ t been afraid to anger colleagues in government .
He ’ s taken on the Pentagon , the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration as well as the departments of Transportation and Energy .
Those agencies have warned that his plans to reallocate spectrum could endanger national security , harm weather forecasts , loosen control of the electrical grid and degrade vehicle safety .
5G opposition is worldwide .
Cities AND countries have taken @ @ @ @ @ @ @ halt deployment due to health and safety risks and warnings ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 .
9 , 10 ) .
Exposure to 5G ( see 1 , 2 ) and other sources of wireless radiation ( see 1 , 2 ) can reduce immunity and cause other health issues including increased cancer risk .
Since 2018 , there have also been reports of people and animals becoming sick after 5G was turned on ( see 1 .
2 , 3 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been filed against the FCC for NOT protecting the public from unsafe levels of radiation ( see 1 , 2 ) as well as 5G .
None of this seems to matter to the agency ( see 1 , 2 .
3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ) .
One commissioner has even referred to 5G opponents as “ Tin Foil Hat ” people .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

Full Steam Ahead: FCC Chairman Dismisses Pentagon, DoT, NOAA, and Energy Dept Opposition to 5G
By B.N. Frank
Activist Post
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is supposed to protect Americans by regulating the telecom industry. Unfortunately, it never seems to work out that way on 5G or anything else. Opposition to 5G has been issued by many respected American government agencies including the U.S. Navy, NOAA, NASA, the Department of Defense, and more. Congress members have also asked that installation be slowed down during the pandemic. The FCC says no.
More from 5G Crisis:
Despite major pushback from the Pentagon, Department of Transportation (DoT), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the Energy Department, Ajit Pai continues to charge forward with plans to speed the rollout of 5G. “NOAA…said the FCC’s push to reallocate some spectrum would set back satellite-assisted weather forecasting decades. The Transportation Department warned about road safety when a patch of airwaves set aside for driverless cars was reassigned. The Energy Department opposed taking spectrum used by the power companies. Perhaps most memorably, the Defense Department raised alarms about the FCC’s April 20 approval of a mobile broadband network, saying the service will interfere with military and civilian GPS.” Read the article here .
From Bloomberg:
In his quest to expand U.S. mobile broadband capacity, Federal Communications CommissionChairman Ajit Pai hasn’t been afraid to anger colleagues in government. He’s taken on the Pentagon, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration as well as the departments of Transportation and Energy. Those agencies have warned that his plans to reallocate spectrum could endanger national security, harm weather forecasts, loosen control of the electrical grid and degrade vehicle safety.
5G opposition is worldwide. Cities AND countries have taken action to ban, delay, and halt deployment due to health and safety risks and warnings (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. 9, 10).
Exposure to 5G (see 1, 2) and other sources of wireless radiation (see 1, 2) can reduce immunity and cause other health issues including increased cancer risk. Since 2018, there have also been reports of people and animals becoming sick after 5G was turned on (see 1. 2, 3, 4). Lawsuits have already been filed against the FCC for NOT protecting the public from unsafe levels of radiation (see 1, 2) as well as 5G. None of this seems to matter to the agency (see 1, 2. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8). One commissioner has even referred to 5G opponents as “Tin Foil Hat” people.
Read the full article at ActivistPost.com.
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-06-11--Federal Lawsuit Could Limit Fluoride in Drinking Water

A landmark federal lawsuit that went to trial this week in California could change the longstanding practice of adding fluoride to the drinking water supplies for 200 million Americans .
The lawsuit , brought against the Environmental Protection Agency by groups including the Fluoride Action Network , Food and Water Watch and Moms Against Fluoridation , would compel the agency to require local water utilities to stop adding fluoride to tap water .
The suit claims fluoridated drinking water presents an unreasonable risk to public health and can harm the developing brain of young children and babies , causing an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , such as Dr. Philippe Grandjean of the Harvard T.H .
Chan School of Public Health , have raised concerns about fluoride neurotoxicity and questioned the safety of fluoride-contaminated drinking water .
The U.S. first began adding fluoride to drinking water in the 1940s in an attempt to combat widespread tooth decay .
In 2011 , responding to a lawsuit by Fluoride Action Network , EWG and Beyond Pesticides , the Department of Health and Human Services recommended that water utilities reduce the amount of fluoride added to tap water by almost half @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or ppm , to 0.7 ppm .
This new recommendation took effect in 2015 .
The levels of fluoride added to tap water supplies can vary , but the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has established 0.7 ppm as a health advisory limit .
EWG analysis of test data for community water systems across the country found roughly 30 million Americans are likely drinking water with fluoride levels higher than the CDC ’ s recommendation , as the news site Fair Warning reported Monday .
The CDC says if infant formula is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s teeth might be affected by dental fluorosis , which appears as white spot markings on the teeth .
EWG recommends that baby formula be mixed with fluoride-free water , especially for an infant whose diet consists exclusively of powdered baby formula .
Excess fluoride exposure poses health risks , including discolored teeth , changes in the bones , and harm to the brain and nervous system .
In 2017 , a groundbreaking study by a team of researchers in Mexico found that exposure to fluoride during pregnancy can harm IQ and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were found in a recent Canadian study .
The case is being argued before federal District Court Judge Edward M. Chen under the Toxic Substances Control Act , which gives the EPA the authority to limit or ban toxic chemicals in the nation ’ s municipal drinking water supply .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

Federal Lawsuit Could Limit Fluoride in Drinking Water
by Olga Naidenko Ph.D., VP, Science Investigations
Environmental Working Group
A landmark federal lawsuit that went to trial this week in California could change the longstanding practice of adding fluoride to the drinking water supplies for 200 million Americans.
The lawsuit, brought against the Environmental Protection Agency by groups including the Fluoride Action Network, Food and Water Watch and Moms Against Fluoridation, would compel the agency to require local water utilities to stop adding fluoride to tap water.
The suit claims fluoridated drinking water presents an unreasonable risk to public health and can harm the developing brain of young children and babies, causing an IQ deficit. Renowned public health experts, such as Dr. Philippe Grandjean of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, have raised concerns about fluoride neurotoxicity and questioned the safety of fluoride-contaminated drinking water.
The U.S. first began adding fluoride to drinking water in the 1940s in an attempt to combat widespread tooth decay.
In 2011, responding to a lawsuit by Fluoride Action Network, EWG and Beyond Pesticides, the Department of Health and Human Services recommended that water utilities reduce the amount of fluoride added to tap water by almost half, from 1.2 parts per million, or ppm, to 0.7 ppm. This new recommendation took effect in 2015.
The levels of fluoride added to tap water supplies can vary, but the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has established 0.7 ppm as a health advisory limit. EWG analysis of test data for community water systems across the country found roughly 30 million Americans are likely drinking water with fluoride levels higher than the CDC’s recommendation, as the news site Fair Warning reported Monday.
The CDC says if infant formula is mixed with fluoridated water, the baby’s teeth might be affected by dental fluorosis, which appears as white spot markings on the teeth. EWG recommends that baby formula be mixed with fluoride-free water, especially for an infant whose diet consists exclusively of powdered baby formula.
Excess fluoride exposure poses health risks, including discolored teeth, changes in the bones, and harm to the brain and nervous system. In 2017, a groundbreaking study by a team of researchers in Mexico found that exposure to fluoride during pregnancy can harm IQ and cognitive development in children. Similar results were found in a recent Canadian study.
The case is being argued before federal District Court Judge Edward M. Chen under the Toxic Substances Control Act, which gives the EPA the authority to limit or ban toxic chemicals in the nation’s municipal drinking water supply.
Read the full article at EWG.org.
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-06-12--Fact-Checking the Facebook “Fact-Checkers”

By Brian S. Hooker , CHD Board Member , and Science Advisor , Focus for Health Children ’ s Health Defense On May 27 , 2020 , the paper “ Analysis of Health Outcomes of Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Children : Developmental Delays , Asthma , Ear Infections and Gastrointestinal Disorders ” that I coauthored with Neil Z. Miller was published in the journal SAGE Open Medicine .
By June 2 , 2020 , Facebook “ fact-checkers ” declared the paper “ unsupported ” and flagged Children ’ s Health Defense ’ s references to the study on the social media @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to the peer-reviewed study , Facebook now directed the reader to a critique completed by Healthfeedback.org , an organization that is a part of the World Health Organization ’ s Vaccine Safety Net with ties to the Gates Foundation .
To view the original paper , one would have to bypass the “ fact-check ” to be directed to the SAGE Open Medicine website .
Playing fast and loose with the facts Unfortunately for the public , the so-called “ fact-checkers ” at Healthfeedback.org play fast and loose with the facts .
First @ @ @ @ @ @ @ hand , the “ fact-checkers ” label my previous Hooker 2014 study “ fraudulent , ” a most serious and reputation-harming charge .
“ Fraudulent ” is a legal term of art which means “ the intentional use of deceit , a trick or some dishonest means to deprive another of their money , property or a legal right.
” The fact of the matter is that Translational Neurodegeneration , where my 2014 study was published , did retract the article under enormous pressure from the Vaccine Industry .
But , in so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fraud , ” “ deception , ” or “ dishonesty ” as a basis for the retraction .
Rather , that Journal retracted the article because of a purportedly undisclosed conflict of interest , but without any finding that the non-disclosure was intentional or material .
Indeed , that study has since been republished in an expanded form ( Hooker 2018 ) .
The primary criticism of the Hooker and Miller 2020 study was the use of a convenience sample which refers to the cohort of 2047 children , from 3 separate pediatric @ @ @ @ @ @ @ formed the basis for our study .
Convenience samples are used routinely in epidemiology and also form the basis for the FDA approval of drugs and biologics .
FALSE .
The U.S. Center for Disease Control ’ s ( CDC ) own studies , many that are cited in the “ fact-checking ” piece , are almost exclusively based on convenience samples .
The study presented by Destefano et al .
2004 in the journal Pediatrics on the timing of the MMR vaccine and autism was completed using a convenience sample of approximately @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Metropolitan Atlanta .
This was not a representative sample of the U.S. population as the percentage of African American children in the study was 35.4 % compared to that of the U.S. at the time at 16 % .
Yet this study is the CDC ’ s basis for denying a causal link between the MMR vaccine and autism in the U.S .
The “ fact-checkers ” cite Andrews et al .
2004 ( Pediatrics ) which is also based on a convenience sample of children in the United Kingdom despite the fact @ @ @ @ @ @ @ proof ” that thimerosal-containing vaccines in the United States do not cause autism .
Also , the “ fact-checkers ” cite four studies ( regarding both thimerosal-containing vaccines and the MMR vaccine ) on children in Denmark as proof that vaccines don ’ t cause autism in U.S. children despite many distinctions between the two populations of children .
Finally , the “ fact-checkers ” cite five studies that are based on the CDC ’ s Vaccine Safety Datalink , a computerized database of the records from nine Health Maintenance Organizations in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a convenience sample ” as it excludes children who are on Preferred Provider Organization ( PPO ) plans as well as those on Medicaid and focuses only on the HMO demographic .
Evidently , the “ fact-checkers ’ ” big beef with the use of a convenience sample is the fact that 30.9 % of the cohort was unvaccinated by their first birthday .
This number makes sense in a study of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children as a significant number of unvaccinated children would be necessary to derive any meaningful statistics whatsoever .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ not controlling for differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated children but seem to ignore the fact that we selected and evaluated differences in the control diagnosis of head injury , a diagnosis that has nothing to do with vaccination .
When the “ fact-checkers ” do acknowledge the control diagnosis , they point out a single , marginally significant relationship between vaccination status and head injury reported in Hooker and Miller , 2020 but neglect to point out that for all of the rest of the analyses ( 11 total ) , no relationship @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Hooker and Miller discuss differences in healthcare seeking behavior between vaccinated and unvaccinated children as a potential limitation of the paper and cite Glanz et al .
2013 which showed that under-vaccinated children were less likely to see medical practitioners for outpatient visits , with an incidence risk ratio of 0.89 .
However , it is clear that effect estimates above 2.0 can not be explained away simply by stating that unvaccinated children are not going to their healthcare provider as much .
The 2004 Pediatrics study ( Andrews et al .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” showing “ no association between vaccines and developmental delay ” was completed on thimerosal-containing vaccines with a control group of thimerosal-free vaccines .
The “ fact-checkers ” deceptively couch this as “ vaccinated versus unvaccinated study ” but there were no unvaccinated children considered in the analysis .
The “ fact-checkers ” also deceptively state that over 20 studies show that vaccines are not associated with autism .
It ’ s unclear why the “ fact-checkers ” discuss autism when “ fact-checking ” our paper since we never analyzed autism .
Again @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccines and the MMR vaccine considered separately and did not consider unvaccinated children .
The only study focused on the vaccination schedule ( Destefano et al .
2013 ) is fraught with methodological errors , including overmatching of cases and controls , to the point that it is scientifically invalid , not to mention that there were no unvaccinated children in the study .
“ Fact-checkers ” also cited studies claiming better cognitive performance in vaccinated children .
However , these studies considered no unvaccinated children but instead looked at minor delays in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2010 ) or the presence/absence of measles vaccination in children who received the BCG and polio vaccine ( Nandi et al .
2019 ) .
Facebook ’ s censorship of the paper I coauthored with Neil Miller is pedestrian .
Looking beyond the veneer of the write-up of the “ fact-checkers , ” one sees an attempt to deceive , not educate the reader .
I welcome everyone to receive our work with an open mind .
Our recommendation from the study is clear : “ A thorough evaluation of vaccinated versus unvaccinated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ spectrum of health effects associated with specific vaccines and the childhood vaccine schedule in totality.
” In addition , Children ’ s Health Defensehas an exhaustive compilation of studies where vaccinated and unvaccinated populations are compared .
This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children ’ s Health Defense , Inc. Want to learn more from Children ’ s Health Defense ?
Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy , Jr. and the Children ’ s Health Defense .
Your donation will help to support them @ @ @ @ @ @ @ article at VaccineImpact.com .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist ( kidney doctor ) , Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people .
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real , ethical medicine .
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines , no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children , and even adults .
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact , part of the Health Impact News network .

By Brian S. Hooker, CHD Board Member, and Science Advisor, Focus for Health
Children’s Health Defense
On May 27, 2020, the paper “Analysis of Health Outcomes of Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Children: Developmental Delays, Asthma, Ear Infections and Gastrointestinal Disorders” that I coauthored with Neil Z. Miller was published in the journal SAGE Open Medicine. By June 2, 2020, Facebook “fact-checkers” declared the paper “unsupported” and flagged Children’s Health Defense’s references to the study on the social media platform.
Instead of following the link to the peer-reviewed study, Facebook now directed the reader to a critique completed by Healthfeedback.org, an organization that is a part of the World Health Organization’s Vaccine Safety Net with ties to the Gates Foundation.
To view the original paper, one would have to bypass the “fact-check” to be directed to the SAGE Open Medicine website.
Playing fast and loose with the facts
Unfortunately for the public, the so-called “fact-checkers” at Healthfeedback.org play fast and loose with the facts.
First, prior to considering the study at hand, the “fact-checkers” label my previous Hooker 2014 study “fraudulent,” a most serious and reputation-harming charge.
“Fraudulent” is a legal term of art which means “the intentional use of deceit, a trick or some dishonest means to deprive another of their money, property or a legal right.”
The fact of the matter is that Translational Neurodegeneration, where my 2014 study was published, did retract the article under enormous pressure from the Vaccine Industry.
But, in so doing, that Journal never cited “fraud,” “deception,” or “dishonesty” as a basis for the retraction. Rather, that Journal retracted the article because of a purportedly undisclosed conflict of interest, but without any finding that the non-disclosure was intentional or material.
Indeed, that study has since been republished in an expanded form (Hooker 2018).
Using a convenience sample
The primary criticism of the Hooker and Miller 2020 study was the use of a convenience sample which refers to the cohort of 2047 children, from 3 separate pediatric practices in the United States, that formed the basis for our study.
Convenience samples are used routinely in epidemiology and also form the basis for the FDA approval of drugs and biologics.
Within the piece, Dr. David Gorski, a pro-pharma blogger states,
“Basically, no matter how you analyze a convenience sample, you can’t generalize it to the larger population.”
FALSE. The U.S. Center for Disease Control’s (CDC) own studies, many that are cited in the “fact-checking” piece, are almost exclusively based on convenience samples.
The study presented by Destefano et al. 2004 in the journal Pediatrics on the timing of the MMR vaccine and autism was completed using a convenience sample of approximately 2400 children in public school districts in Metropolitan Atlanta.
This was not a representative sample of the U.S. population as the percentage of African American children in the study was 35.4% compared to that of the U.S. at the time at 16%.
Yet this study is the CDC’s basis for denying a causal link between the MMR vaccine and autism in the U.S.
The “fact-checkers” cite Andrews et al. 2004 (Pediatrics) which is also based on a convenience sample of children in the United Kingdom despite the fact that the CDC cites it as “proof” that thimerosal-containing vaccines in the United States do not cause autism.
Also, the “fact-checkers” cite four studies (regarding both thimerosal-containing vaccines and the MMR vaccine) on children in Denmark as proof that vaccines don’t cause autism in U.S. children despite many distinctions between the two populations of children.
Finally, the “fact-checkers” cite five studies that are based on the CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink, a computerized database of the records from nine Health Maintenance Organizations in the U.S.
This could also be considered a convenience sample” as it excludes children who are on Preferred Provider Organization (PPO) plans as well as those on Medicaid and focuses only on the HMO demographic.
The necessary meaningful statistics
Evidently, the “fact-checkers’” big beef with the use of a convenience sample is the fact that 30.9% of the cohort was unvaccinated by their first birthday.
This number makes sense in a study of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children as a significant number of unvaccinated children would be necessary to derive any meaningful statistics whatsoever.
“Fact-checkers” accuse the co-investigators of not controlling for differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated children but seem to ignore the fact that we selected and evaluated differences in the control diagnosis of head injury, a diagnosis that has nothing to do with vaccination.
When the “fact-checkers” do acknowledge the control diagnosis, they point out a single, marginally significant relationship between vaccination status and head injury reported in Hooker and Miller, 2020 but neglect to point out that for all of the rest of the analyses (11 total), no relationship between vaccination and head injury was observed.
Hooker and Miller discuss differences in healthcare seeking behavior between vaccinated and unvaccinated children as a potential limitation of the paper and cite Glanz et al. 2013 which showed that under-vaccinated children were less likely to see medical practitioners for outpatient visits, with an incidence risk ratio of 0.89.
However, it is clear that effect estimates above 2.0 cannot be explained away simply by stating that unvaccinated children are not going to their healthcare provider as much.
The 2004 Pediatrics study (Andrews et al. 2004) cited by the “fact-checkers” showing “no association between vaccines and developmental delay” was completed on thimerosal-containing vaccines with a control group of thimerosal-free vaccines.
The “fact-checkers” deceptively couch this as “vaccinated versus unvaccinated study” but there were no unvaccinated children considered in the analysis. The “fact-checkers” also deceptively state that over 20 studies show that vaccines are not associated with autism.
It’s unclear why the “fact-checkers” discuss autism when “fact-checking” our paper since we never analyzed autism. Again, the studies listed focus on thimerosal-containing vaccines and the MMR vaccine considered separately and did not consider unvaccinated children.
The only study focused on the vaccination schedule (Destefano et al. 2013) is fraught with methodological errors, including overmatching of cases and controls, to the point that it is scientifically invalid, not to mention that there were no unvaccinated children in the study.
“Fact-checkers” also cited studies claiming better cognitive performance in vaccinated children. However, these studies considered no unvaccinated children but instead looked at minor delays in the vaccination schedule (Smith and Woods 2010) or the presence/absence of measles vaccination in children who received the BCG and polio vaccine (Nandi et al. 2019).
Facebook’s censorship of the paper I coauthored with Neil Miller is pedestrian. Looking beyond the veneer of the write-up of the “fact-checkers,” one sees an attempt to deceive, not educate the reader.
I welcome everyone to receive our work with an open mind. Our recommendation from the study is clear: “A thorough evaluation of vaccinated versus unvaccinated populations is essential to understanding the full spectrum of health effects associated with specific vaccines and the childhood vaccine schedule in totality.”
In addition, Children’s Health Defensehas an exhaustive compilation of studies where vaccinated and unvaccinated populations are compared.
Read the full article at ChildrensHealthDefense.org.
© 2020 Children’s Health Defense, Inc.
This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc.
Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support them in their efforts.
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.
See Also:
Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Book – The Vaccine Court “The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program” ORDER HERE!
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
Order here!
Make a Statement for Health Freedom!
Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children, and even adults.
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact, part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!


healthimpactnews--2020-06-12--Google Search is the Greatest Mind Control Brainwashing Tool in the History of Mankind

It is very interesting that as I was searching for stock images to include with this article depicting “ brainwashing , ” that almost all of the photos or images were related to TV .
Operation Mockingbird and other sources have conclusively shown over the years that television media has been the primary way the CIA and other secret intelligence agencies have utilized to shape current cultural thought of the masses .
Corporate news organizations and the Hollywood entertainment industries have been doing this for decades , and it is a well-known fact .
See : Mainstream News Media : @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ?
The way the media conditions us was also brilliantly documented earlier this year in the online film , Out of Shadows .
In the late 1990s and early 2000s , the Internet became more popular as more and more of the world ’ s information , news , and data became digitized .
Technology began to be developed to search through the massive volumes of data that were being digitized and put on the Internet , and soon the Internet became known as “ The Great Equalizer ” to combat the propaganda @ @ @ @ @ @ @ through radio and TV .
Larry Page and Sergey Brin were students at Stanford University in California during this time , and they developed software code that allowed one to return Internet searches very quickly .
Investors were investing heavily into tech companies during that time , and Page and Brin took advantage of that to secure large investors for their new Internet search company , Google .
Google was presented to the public as an ethical , altruistic company in their early days .
We trusted them as the “ great equalizer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the corporate propaganda we knew was being filtered through the “ mainstream ” corporate propaganda media .
They quickly dominated the world in terms of search engine searches , so much so that their name became a verb synonymous with finding unbiased information : “ Go Google it.
” Today , most of the world ’ s online digital data is housed in the vast clouds of Google servers .
But what if the controller of data was no longer simply offering up search results based on matching information , but was controlling @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they wanted you to see , while suppressing other information they did not want you to see ?
If that were to happen , we would have a company much more powerful in terms of its ability to manipulate data as propaganda and steer people ’ s thoughts and attitudes far more pervasively than anything the old corporate TV media could ever do .
And that is exactly what is happening today , as Google ’ s values are clearly on display by the information they censor , and by displaying what they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have been complicit in spreading the misinformation about the Plandemic , as it is obvious to see that their goals and values align with Big Pharma and the New World Order .
Today , Google is much more than just an Internet Search company , and they now also produce and sell pharmaceutical products as well .
See : If you think I am exaggerating , please watch this excellent video just published by Sayer Ji of GreenMedInfo.com as he demonstrates just how Google manipulates their search results to achieve their own manipulative @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ’ s massive propaganda search tool , would the whole world have voluntarily allowed themselves to be quarantined in their own homes while losing their jobs ?
Google should be prosecuted for fraud and crimes against humanity .
The UN “ New World Order ” Has Now Been Published : No Longer a “ Conspiracy Theory ” – Out of Shadows New World Order Continues to be Published : The “ Great Reset ” – Transhumanism and the 4th Industrial Revolution The Myth of Right vs. Left , Liberal vs. Conservative – Top @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Usher in a New World Order Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
It is very interesting that as I was searching for stock images to include with this article depicting “brainwashing,” that almost all of the photos or images were related to TV.
Operation Mockingbird and other sources have conclusively shown over the years that television media has been the primary way the CIA and other secret intelligence agencies have utilized to shape current cultural thought of the masses. Corporate news organizations and the Hollywood entertainment industries have been doing this for decades, and it is a well-known fact. See:
The way the media conditions us was also brilliantly documented earlier this year in the online film, Out of Shadows.
In the late 1990s and early 2000s, the Internet became more popular as more and more of the world’s information, news, and data became digitized. Technology began to be developed to search through the massive volumes of data that were being digitized and put on the Internet, and soon the Internet became known as “The Great Equalizer” to combat the propaganda of the corporate giants controlling information flowing through radio and TV.
Larry Page and Sergey Brin were students at Stanford University in California during this time, and they developed software code that allowed one to return Internet searches very quickly. Investors were investing heavily into tech companies during that time, and Page and Brin took advantage of that to secure large investors for their new Internet search company, Google.
Google was presented to the public as an ethical, altruistic company in their early days. We trusted them as the “great equalizer” to quickly find information to combat the corporate propaganda we knew was being filtered through the “mainstream” corporate propaganda media.
They quickly dominated the world in terms of search engine searches, so much so that their name became a verb synonymous with finding unbiased information: “Go Google it.”
Today, most of the world’s online digital data is housed in the vast clouds of Google servers.
But what if the controller of data was no longer simply offering up search results based on matching information, but was controlling that information to display search results that they wanted you to see, while suppressing other information they did not want you to see?
If that were to happen, we would have a company much more powerful in terms of its ability to manipulate data as propaganda and steer people’s thoughts and attitudes far more pervasively than anything the old corporate TV media could ever do.
And that is exactly what is happening today, as Google’s values are clearly on display by the information they censor, and by displaying what they want you to see, and they have been complicit in spreading the misinformation about the Plandemic, as it is obvious to see that their goals and values align with Big Pharma and the New World Order.
Today, Google is much more than just an Internet Search company, and they now also produce and sell pharmaceutical products as well. See:
If you think I am exaggerating, please watch this excellent video just published by Sayer Ji of GreenMedInfo.com as he demonstrates just how Google manipulates their search results to achieve their own manipulative purposes. Without the help of Google’s massive propaganda search tool, would the whole world have voluntarily allowed themselves to be quarantined in their own homes while losing their jobs?
Google should be prosecuted for fraud and crimes against humanity.
See Also:
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-06-14--Biggest Bailout of Wall Street in U.S. History was Planned Months before the Plandemic Virus Crisis

Biggest Bailout of Wall Street in U.S. History was Planned Months before the Plandemic Virus Crisis – “Big” Pharma now HUGE Pharma

We have been reporting here at Health Impact News that the worldwide reaction to the Coronavirus has been a very well-planned event that has allowed life as we knew it to change almost overnight , as the New World Order plan is no longer a conspiracy , but something that has been published now for everyone to see .
The UN “ New World Order ” Has Now Been Published : No Longer a “ Conspiracy Theory ” – Out of Shadows The New World Order : Creating a Crisis so the Rich Get Richer While Millions Lose Their Jobs @ @ @ @ @ @ @ : The “ Great Reset ” – Transhumanism and the 4th Industrial Revolution The transfer of wealth from the middle class and small businesses to Wall Street has also been very swift , as three stimulus packages have already been implemented , with the vast majority of new money being produced by the Federal Reserve and the Central Bankers primarily benefiting the pharmaceutical industry , which has a blank check at this point to develop COVID vaccines at “ Warp Speed.
” Project “ Warp Speed ” is led by General Gustave Perna @ @ @ @ @ @ @ former chairman of GlaxoSmithKline ’ s vaccines division , who has worked closely with Bill Gates and other Big Pharma leaders , including Google which is also now a pharmaceutical company .
Trump Mobilizes Military to Deliver Coronavirus Vaccine – Appoints Another Bill Gates Funded Big Pharma Exec as Chief Military Advisor And now it is being reported that a Phase Four stimulus package is in the works , where President Trump wants another $ 2 TRILLION in bailouts ( Democrat Nancy Peolsi wants $ 3 TRILLION ) “ with the bulk of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ base , starting with pharmaceuticals and medical supplies and equipment.
” ( Source ) In an article published by Pam Martens and Russ Martens at Wall Street on Parade , we learn that not only was the reaction to a “ new ” virus pre-planned before it happened , so were the economic stimulus packages that have destroyed America ’ s economy , and in fact the world economy , by former central bankers now on the payroll at an investment firm called BlackRock .
BlackRock Authored the Bailout Plan Before There Was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Been Hired by three Central Banks to Implement the Plan by Pam Martens and Russ Martens Wall Street on Parade It ’ s called “ Going Direct.
” That ’ s the financial bailout plan designed and authored by former central bankers now on the payroll at BlackRock , an investment manager of $ 7 trillion in stock and bond funds .
The plan was rolled out in August 2019 at the G7 summit of central bankers in Jackson Hole , Wyoming – months before the public was aware of any financial crisis @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 17 , 2019 , the U.S. Federal Reserve would begin an emergency repo loan bailout program , making hundreds of billions of dollars a week in loans by “ going direct ” to the trading houses on Wall Street .
The BlackRock plan calls for blurring the lines between government fiscal policy and central bank monetary policy – exactly what the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve are doing today in the United States .
BlackRock has now been hired by the Federal Reserve , the Bank of Canada , and Sweden ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ implement key features of the plan .
Three of the authors of the BlackRock plan previously worked as central bankers in the U.S. , Canada and Switzerland , respectively .
The authors wrote in the white paper that : We now understand why , for the first time in history , the U.S. Congress handed over $ 454 billion of taxpayers ’ money to the Fed , without any meaningful debate , to eat losses on toxic assets produced by the Wall Street banks it supervises .
The Fed plans to leverage the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ trillion bailout plan , “ going direct ” with bailouts to the commercial paper market , money market funds , and a host of other markets .
The BlackRock plan further explains why , for the first time in history , the Fed has hired BlackRock to “ go direct ” and buy up $ 750 billion in both primary and secondary corporate bonds and bond ETFs ( Exchange Traded Funds ) , a product of which BlackRock is one of the largest purveyors in the world .
Adding further outrage , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the $ 454 billion in taxpayers ’ money to eat the losses on its corporate bond purchases , which will include its own ETFs , which the Fed is allowing it to buy in the program .
Helicopter money is also spelled out in the BlackRock plan , which explains why simultaneously with the $ 454 billion Congress carved out for the Fed under the CARES Act , fiscal stimulus was also “ going direct ” with $ 1200 checks and direct deposits to the little people of America and Paycheck Protection @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” to small businesses .
In the United States , approximately 85 percent of the stock market is owned by the richest 10 percent of Americans .
Buying stocks would simply expand and accelerate the wealth and income inequality which is already at the highest levels since the 1920s – a time when Wall Street also owned large deposit-taking banks .
The Swiss National Bank , the central bank of Switzerland , where one of the BlackRock authors previously worked , already has massive holdings of individual stocks , including $ 94 billion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ according to its March 31 , 2020 report that was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission .
The BlackRock authors of the “ Going Direct ” plan are the following : Stanley Fischer : Fischer was Vice Chairman of Citigroup from 2002 to 2005 .
Citigroup received the largest bailout in global banking history , getting $ 2.5 trillion cumulatively in revolving loans from the Fed and billions more from taxpayers in the financial crisis of 2007 to 2010 .
Fischer went from Citigroup to serve as Governor of the central bank @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from 2005 to 2013 .
( He holds dual citizenship in Israel and the U.S. ) One year later , Fischer became a Governor on the U.S. Federal Reserve Board , advancing to Vice Chairman on June 16 , 2014 .
He resigned his position at the Fed October 13 , 2017 and joined BlackRock as a Senior Advisor in January 2019 .
Philipp Hildebrand : Hildebrand was Chairman of the Governing Board of the Swiss National Bank from 2010 until he abruptly resigned in early 2012 .
( There was a scandal @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fund trader , making trades in currencies while he had inside information on interest rates . )
Hildebrand is now Vice Chairman of BlackRock and a member of the firm ’ s Global Executive Committee .
Jean Boivin : Boivin is the Head of the BlackRock Investment Institute .
He joined BlackRock in 2014 .
Prior to joining BlackRock , Boivin was appointed Deputy Governor of the Bank of Canada in March 2010 where he served for two years .
Boivin left the Bank of Canada in October 2012 to become Associate Deputy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and to serve as Canada ’ s Finance Deputy at the G-7 , G-20 and the Financial Stability Board .
Elga Bartsch : Bartsch heads up economic and markets research at the Blackrock Investment Institute .
Prior to joining BlackRock , Bartsch was Global Co-Head of Economics and Chief European Economist at Morgan Stanley in London .
According to the government audit of the Fed ’ s bailout programs during the 2007-2010 financial crisis , Morgan Stanley was the second largest recipient of the Fed ’ s bailout programs , behind Citigroup , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , below-market rate loans .
On May 15 , the central bank of Sweden , the Riksbank , announced that it would be using BlackRock to conduct “ an analysis of the Swedish corporate bonds market and an assessment of possible design options for a potential corporate bonds asset purchase programme.
” The Bank of Canada announced in April that BlackRock has been hired as an adviser for its commercial paper , provincial bond , and corporate bond buying programs .
The Federal Reserve has given a no-bid contract to BlackRock to manage @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Peter Ewart , a writer based in Prince George , British Columbia , wrote the following in the Prince George Daily News about BlackRock ’ s role in herding central bank actions : Wall Street On Parade is a financial news site created and maintained by Russ and Pam Martens .
Mr. Martens ’ career spans four decades in publishing and printing management , including magazine and music publishing and the non-profit sector .
Mr. Martens has received numerous awards in publishing and graphic design .
Ms. Martens worked on Wall Street for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ her career was spent as an outspoken critic of Wall Street ’ s corrupt practices , its private justice system and the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act .
( This YouTube video captures Ms. Martens testifying before the Federal Reserve on June 26 , 1998 against the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act . )
Ms. Martens ’ earlier career was in publishing , including editor-in-chief of a national trade magazine .
Neither Russ Martens nor Pam Martens hold any security position , long or short , in any Wall Street firm or banking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ web site .
Mission : Wall Street On Parade hopes to level the playing field between Wall Street and the 99 percent .
Wall Street is a jungle of devices to effect an institutionalized wealth transfer system .
The goal of this web site is to provide the jungle guide to the 99 percent in the hope of bringing about citizen-inspired change .
Pharmaceutical Industry is the Leading Cause of Death in U.S. , and the Largest Criminal Group in the World To understand who is behind the plan to usher in a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ previous articles : Unmasking Who is Behind the Plandemic and Rioting to Usher in the New World Order The Myth of Right vs. Left , Liberal vs. Conservative – Top 9 Myths Believed by BOTH Sides to Usher in a New World Order Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
We have been reporting here at Health Impact News that the worldwide reaction to the Coronavirus has been a very well-planned event that has allowed life as we knew it to change almost overnight, as the New World Order plan is no longer a conspiracy, but something that has been published now for everyone to see.
The transfer of wealth from the middle class and small businesses to Wall Street has also been very swift, as three stimulus packages have already been implemented, with the vast majority of new money being produced by the Federal Reserve and the Central Bankers primarily benefiting the pharmaceutical industry, which has a blank check at this point to develop COVID vaccines at “Warp Speed.”
Project “Warp Speed” is led by General Gustave Perna, and Dr. Moncef Slaoui, the former chairman of GlaxoSmithKline’s vaccines division, who has worked closely with Bill Gates and other Big Pharma leaders, including Google, which is also now a pharmaceutical company.
And now it is being reported that a Phase Four stimulus package is in the works, where President Trump wants another $2 TRILLION in bailouts (Democrat Nancy Peolsi wants $3 TRILLION),
“with the bulk of that focused on bringing home our manufacturing base, starting with pharmaceuticals and medical supplies and equipment.” (Source)
In an article published by Pam Martens and Russ Martens at Wall Street on Parade, we learn that not only was the reaction to a “new” virus pre-planned before it happened, so were the economic stimulus packages that have destroyed America’s economy, and in fact the world economy, by former central bankers now on the payroll at an investment firm called BlackRock.
BlackRock Authored the Bailout Plan Before There Was a Crisis – Now It’s Been Hired by three Central Banks to Implement the Plan
by Pam Martens and Russ Martens
Wall Street on Parade
Excerpts:
It’s called “Going Direct.” That’s the financial bailout plan designed and authored by former central bankers now on the payroll at BlackRock, an investment manager of $7 trillion in stock and bond funds. The plan was rolled out in August 2019 at the G7 summit of central bankers in Jackson Hole, Wyoming – months before the public was aware of any financial crisis. One month later, on September 17, 2019, the U.S. Federal Reserve would begin an emergency repo loan bailout program, making hundreds of billions of dollars a week in loans by “going direct” to the trading houses on Wall Street.
The BlackRock plan calls for blurring the lines between government fiscal policy and central bank monetary policy – exactly what the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve are doing today in the United States. BlackRock has now been hired by the Federal Reserve, the Bank of Canada, and Sweden’s central bank, Riksbank, to implement key features of the plan. Three of the authors of the BlackRock plan previously worked as central bankers in the U.S., Canada and Switzerland, respectively.
The authors wrote in the white paper that:
“in a downturn the only solution is for a more formal – and historically unusual – coordination of monetary and fiscal policy to provide effective stimulus.”
We now understand why, for the first time in history, the U.S. Congress handed over $454 billion of taxpayers’ money to the Fed, without any meaningful debate, to eat losses on toxic assets produced by the Wall Street banks it supervises. The Fed plans to leverage the $454 billion into a $4.54 trillion bailout plan, “going direct” with bailouts to the commercial paper market, money market funds, and a host of other markets.
The BlackRock plan further explains why, for the first time in history, the Fed has hired BlackRock to “go direct” and buy up $750 billion in both primary and secondary corporate bonds and bond ETFs (Exchange Traded Funds), a product of which BlackRock is one of the largest purveyors in the world. Adding further outrage, the BlackRock-run program will get $75 billion of the $454 billion in taxpayers’ money to eat the losses on its corporate bond purchases, which will include its own ETFs, which the Fed is allowing it to buy in the program.
Helicopter money is also spelled out in the BlackRock plan, which explains why simultaneously with the $454 billion Congress carved out for the Fed under the CARES Act, fiscal stimulus was also “going direct” with $1200 checks and direct deposits to the little people of America and Paycheck Protection Program loans and grants “going direct” to small businesses.
In the United States, approximately 85 percent of the stock market is owned by the richest 10 percent of Americans. Buying stocks would simply expand and accelerate the wealth and income inequality which is already at the highest levels since the 1920s – a time when Wall Street also owned large deposit-taking banks.
The Swiss National Bank, the central bank of Switzerland, where one of the BlackRock authors previously worked, already has massive holdings of individual stocks, including $94 billion in publicly traded stocks in the U.S. according to its March 31, 2020 report that was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The BlackRock authors of the “Going Direct” plan are the following:
Stanley Fischer: Fischer was Vice Chairman of Citigroup from 2002 to 2005. Citigroup received the largest bailout in global banking history, getting $2.5 trillion cumulatively in revolving loans from the Fed and billions more from taxpayers in the financial crisis of 2007 to 2010. Fischer went from Citigroup to serve as Governor of the central bank of Israel (Bank of Israel) from 2005 to 2013. (He holds dual citizenship in Israel and the U.S.) One year later, Fischer became a Governor on the U.S. Federal Reserve Board, advancing to Vice Chairman on June 16, 2014. He resigned his position at the Fed October 13, 2017 and joined BlackRock as a Senior Advisor in January 2019.
Philipp Hildebrand: Hildebrand was Chairman of the Governing Board of the Swiss National Bank from 2010 until he abruptly resigned in early 2012. (There was a scandal over his wife, a former hedge fund trader, making trades in currencies while he had inside information on interest rates.) Hildebrand is now Vice Chairman of BlackRock and a member of the firm’s Global Executive Committee.
Jean Boivin: Boivin is the Head of the BlackRock Investment Institute. He joined BlackRock in 2014. Prior to joining BlackRock, Boivin was appointed Deputy Governor of the Bank of Canada in March 2010 where he served for two years. Boivin left the Bank of Canada in October 2012 to become Associate Deputy Minister at the Department of Finance, and to serve as Canada’s Finance Deputy at the G-7, G-20 and the Financial Stability Board.
Elga Bartsch: Bartsch heads up economic and markets research at the Blackrock Investment Institute. Prior to joining BlackRock, Bartsch was Global Co-Head of Economics and Chief European Economist at Morgan Stanley in London. According to the government audit of the Fed’s bailout programs during the 2007-2010 financial crisis, Morgan Stanley was the second largest recipient of the Fed’s bailout programs, behind Citigroup, receiving $2.04 trillion cumulatively in revolving, below-market rate loans.
On May 15, the central bank of Sweden, the Riksbank, announced that it would be using BlackRock to conduct “an analysis of the Swedish corporate bonds market and an assessment of possible design options for a potential corporate bonds asset purchase programme.”
The Bank of Canada announced in April that BlackRock has been hired as an adviser for its commercial paper, provincial bond, and corporate bond buying programs.
The Federal Reserve has given a no-bid contract to BlackRock to manage all of its corporate bond programs.
Peter Ewart, a writer based in Prince George, British Columbia, wrote the following in the Prince George Daily News about BlackRock’s role in herding central bank actions:
“The situation also shows how the economic system in both Canada and the U.S. is not classical capitalism but rather state monopoly capitalism, where giant enterprises are regularly backstopped with public funds and the boundaries between the state and the financial oligarchy are virtually non-existent.”
Read the full article at WallStreetonParade.com.
Wall Street On Parade is a financial news site created and maintained by Russ and Pam Martens.
Mr. Martens’ career spans four decades in publishing and printing management, including magazine and music publishing and the non-profit sector. Mr. Martens has received numerous awards in publishing and graphic design.
Ms. Martens worked on Wall Street for 21 years. The last decade of her career was spent as an outspoken critic of Wall Street’s corrupt practices, its private justice system and the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act. (This YouTube video captures Ms. Martens testifying before the Federal Reserve on June 26, 1998 against the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act.) Ms. Martens’ earlier career was in publishing, including editor-in-chief of a national trade magazine.
Neither Russ Martens nor Pam Martens hold any security position, long or short, in any Wall Street firm or banking institution, including those discussed on this web site.
Mission: Wall Street On Parade hopes to level the playing field between Wall Street and the 99 percent. Wall Street is a jungle of devices to effect an institutionalized wealth transfer system. The goal of this web site is to provide the jungle guide to the 99 percent in the hope of bringing about citizen-inspired change.
See Also:
To understand who is behind the plan to usher in a New World Order, please see these previous articles:
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-06-15--FDA Moves to Prohibit Hydroxychloroquine Use

The Food and Drug Administration said in a Monday letter that it has revoked its authorization for the emergency use authorization ( EUA ) governing the use of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19 .
The decision – a response to a request by a Health and Human Services official to revoke the EUA – cites “ new information , including clinical trial data results , ” which have led the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority ( BARDA ) “ to conclude that this drug may not be effective to treat COVID-19 [ Coronavirus Disease 2019 ] @ @ @ @ @ @ @ benefits for such use do not outweigh its known and potential risks.
” “ Earlier observations of decreased viral shedding with HCQ or CQ treatment have not been consistently replicated and recent data from a randomized controlled trial assessing probability of negative conversion showed no difference between HCQ and standard of care alone , ” wrote FDA chief scientists Denise Hinton .
Of significant note , none of the studies cited include the use of zinc – which has been widely cited as the ‘ key ’ which HCQ provides a tunnel into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fact , the FDA ’ s letter doesn ’ t include the word ‘ zinc ’ or its symbol , Zn .
Hours after the FDA revoked its EUA on hydroxychloroquine , the agency dealt another blow to the COVID-19 treatment – warning not to combine the incredibly inexpensive anti-malarial with the incredibly expensive remdesivir ; Gilead Sciences ’ yet-to-be-priced experimental treatment .
The agency , based on data from a recent non-clinical study , said the co-administration may result in reduced antiviral activity of remdesivir .
It also added it had no @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that it continues to evaluate all data related to remdesivir .
FDA said it was no longer reasonable to believe that oral formulations of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine may be effective in treating the illness caused by the novel coronavirus .
–Reuters Editors of The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine : Pharmaceutical Companies are so Financially Powerful They Pressure us to Accept Papers

by Tyler Durden
ZeroHedge.com
Excerpts:
The Food and Drug Administration said in a Monday letter that it has revoked its authorization for the emergency use authorization (EUA) governing the use of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19.
The decision – a response to a request by a Health and Human Services official to revoke the EUA – cites “new information, including clinical trial data results,” which have led the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) “to conclude that this drug may not be effective to treat COVID-19 [Coronavirus Disease 2019] and that the drug’s potential benefits for such use do not outweigh its known and potential risks.”
“Earlier observations of decreased viral shedding with HCQ or CQ treatment have not been consistently replicated and recent data from a randomized controlled trial assessing probability of negative conversion showed no difference between HCQ and standard of care alone,” wrote FDA chief scientists Denise Hinton.
Of significant note, none of the studies cited include the use of zinc – which has been widely cited as the ‘key’ which HCQ provides a tunnel into cells to halt virus replication.
In fact, the FDA’s letter doesn’t include the word ‘zinc’ or its symbol, Zn.
Hours after the FDA revoked its EUA on hydroxychloroquine, the agency dealt another blow to the COVID-19 treatment – warning not to combine the incredibly inexpensive anti-malarial with the incredibly expensive remdesivir; Gilead Sciences’ yet-to-be-priced experimental treatment.
The agency, based on data from a recent non-clinical study, said the co-administration may result in reduced antiviral activity of remdesivir. It also added it had no such evidence from a clinical setting and that it continues to evaluate all data related to remdesivir. * * * FDA said it was no longer reasonable to believe that oral formulations of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine may be effective in treating the illness caused by the novel coronavirus. –Reuters
Read the full article at ZeroHedge.com.
See Also: