healthimpactnews--2020-11-24--From “Academic Superstar” in 97th Percentile to Wheelchair and Bed Ridden After Gardasil Vaccine – M

From “Academic Superstar” in 97th Percentile to Wheelchair and Bed Ridden After Gardasil Vaccine – Merck Being Sued for 4th Time by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

Today , the national law firm of Baum Hedlund Aristei & Goldman and I filed our fourth Gardasil lawsuit against Merck , on behalf of Sahara Walker , 19 , of Lake Mills , Wisconsin , who suffered debilitating injuries from the HPV vaccine .
When she took the Gardasil jab at age 11 , Sahara was happy , healthy , popular , athletic and an academic superstar who had just scored in the top 97th percentile of all Wisconsin students in math .
Two days later , Sahara was vomiting and experiencing headaches , severe body aches , fevers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ her days away .
Within a month she was either bedridden or wheelchair bound .
Her symptoms worsened .
In 2015 , Sahara endured 54 doctor appointments and her medication regimen climbed to 55 pills per day .
Specialists diagnosed Sahara with neurocardiogenic syncope , postural orthostatic tachycardia ( POTS ) , a form of orthostatic intolerance called orthostatic hypotension , small fiber neuropathy and severe autoimmune autonomic neuropathy .
Her injuries forced her to homeschool from grades 6 to 12 .
Today , Sahara , 19 , takes 14 prescription medications and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ three weeks .
“ I want to warn kids of the terrible risks for this vaccine and let other injured girls know that they are not alone , ” Sahara explained .
“ The Gardasil vaccine stole my life .
Before Gardasil , my future was filled with endless possibilities .
Now , my life is a parade of accommodations and medical interventions .
It ’ s not how a 19 year old should live .
I ’ m fighting for all of us.
” If Merck had warned Sahara ’ s mother @ @ @ @ @ @ @ never would have allowed her daughter to receive the HPV vaccine .
“ We are pro-vaccine , but we would have never had Sahara get Gardasil if we knew the risks , ” Sahara ’ s mother said .
“ She went from perfectly healthy to sick and disabled within days of the shot .
It ’ s beyond any doubt that Gardasil caused her injuries.
” Internal documents showed that Merck cherry-picked its own data to mislead the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and doctors about Gardasil ’ s safety and efficacy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Sahara and others impacted and to force Merck to stop defrauding the public so that we can protect our children .
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com .
14-Year-Old Active Girl in Wisconsin Suffers Over 300 Seizures After Gardasil Vaccine – Doctor Refuses to Consider Gardasil Cause due to Fear of Losing Research Funding Illinois Teen Dies Three Weeks After Being Injected with HPV Gardasil Vaccine California Nurse Gives Gardasil Vaccine to Own Daughter who Develops Leukemia and Dies Infant Accidentally Vaccinated with Gardasil – Mother Blamed for Vaccine Injuries and Baby Medically @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Vaccine is Gone Forever Gardasil Vaccine Given without Consent and Ruins Life of 14 Year Old Girl After 3 Years of Suffering 19 Year Old Girl Dies from Gardasil Vaccine Injuries Gardasil : The Decision We Will Always Regret 15 Year Old French Girl ’ s “ Descent into Hell ” After Gardasil Vaccine – Wheelchair Bound and Paralyzed The Gardasil Vaccine After-Life : My Daughter is a Shadow of Her Former Self Gardasil : An Experience no Child Should Have to Go Through I Want my Daughter ’ s Life Back the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by Force with Gardasil now Suffers from Paralysis and Pain Gardasil : We Thought It Was The Right Choice “ HPV Vaccine Has Done This to My Child ” 13 Year Old World Championship Karate Student Forced to Quit After Gardasil Vaccine If I Could Turn Back Time , Korey Would not Have Received any Gardasil Shots What Doctors Don ’ t Tell You : Our Gardasil Horror Story Family Fights U.S. Government over Compensation for Gardasil Vaccine Injuries Gardasil : When Will our Nightmare End ?
HPV Vaccine Injuries : “ I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is Like to Watch your Daughter Live in Such Agony ” Gardasil : Don ’ t Let Your Child Become “ One Less ” The Gardasil Vaccine Changed Our Definition of “ Normal ” Gardasil : I Should Have Researched First “ They ’ ve Been Robbed of Their Womanhood ” – Local Milwaukee Media Covers Gardasil Vaccine Injuries Gardasil : The Decision I will Always Regret After Gardasil : I Simply Want my Healthy Daughter Back Gardasil : My Family Suffers with Me Gardasil Changed my Health , my Life , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Battle After the Gardasil Vaccine Gardasil : The Worst Thing That Ever Happened to Me The Dark Side of Gardasil – A Nightmare that Became Real We have published hundreds of stories about Gardasil over the past few years , and not just personal stories of the vaccine ’ s effects , but also articles uncovering the corruption that allowed this vaccine to come to market , and published scientific studies , all outside the U.S. , showing how dangerous this vaccine really is .
Many countries , like Japan , do not @ @ @ @ @ @

“I want to warn kids of the terrible risks for this vaccine and let other injured girls know that they are not alone. The Gardasil vaccine stole my life. Before Gardasil, my future was filled with endless possibilities.”
by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
Children’s Health Defense
Today, the national law firm of Baum Hedlund Aristei & Goldman and I filed our fourth Gardasil lawsuit against Merck, on behalf of Sahara Walker, 19, of Lake Mills, Wisconsin, who suffered debilitating injuries from the HPV vaccine.
When she took the Gardasil jab at age 11, Sahara was happy, healthy, popular, athletic and an academic superstar who had just scored in the top 97th percentile of all Wisconsin students in math.
Two days later, Sahara was vomiting and experiencing headaches, severe body aches, fevers and soul-crushing fatigue that made her sleep her days away. Within a month she was either bedridden or wheelchair bound.
Her symptoms worsened. In 2015, Sahara endured 54 doctor appointments and her medication regimen climbed to 55 pills per day. Specialists diagnosed Sahara with neurocardiogenic syncope, postural orthostatic tachycardia (POTS), a form of orthostatic intolerance called orthostatic hypotension, small fiber neuropathy and severe autoimmune autonomic neuropathy. Her injuries forced her to homeschool from grades 6 to 12.
Today, Sahara, 19, takes 14 prescription medications and receives an expensive intravenous immunoglobulin treatment every three weeks.
“I want to warn kids of the terrible risks for this vaccine and let other injured girls know that they are not alone,” Sahara explained. “The Gardasil vaccine stole my life. Before Gardasil, my future was filled with endless possibilities. Now, my life is a parade of accommodations and medical interventions. It’s not how a 19 year old should live. I’m fighting for all of us.”
If Merck had warned Sahara’s mother about Gardasil’s dangers, she never would have allowed her daughter to receive the HPV vaccine.
“We are pro-vaccine, but we would have never had Sahara get Gardasil if we knew the risks,” Sahara’s mother said. “She went from perfectly healthy to sick and disabled within days of the shot. It’s beyond any doubt that Gardasil caused her injuries.”
Internal documents showed that Merck cherry-picked its own data to mislead the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and doctors about Gardasil’s safety and efficacy. We aim to get justice for Sahara and others impacted and to force Merck to stop defrauding the public so that we can protect our children.
Read the full article at Children’s Health Defense.
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.
We have published hundreds of stories about Gardasil over the past few years, and not just personal stories of the vaccine’s effects, but also articles uncovering the corruption that allowed this vaccine to come to market, and published scientific studies, all outside the U.S., showing how dangerous this vaccine really is. Many countries, like Japan, do not recommend this vaccine any longer.


healthimpactnews--2020-11-24--How Will the Injuries and Deaths from Hundreds of Millions of Experimental COVID Vaccines be Compens

How Will the Injuries and Deaths from Hundreds of Millions of Experimental COVID Vaccines be Compensated?

Even before COVID became part of our life here in 2020 , very few Americans even knew that a law was passed in 1986 that allowed pharmaceutical companies to not be sued in civil court for injuries and deaths caused by vaccines .
Prior to 1986 , the pharmaceutical companies were being sued in court so often from vaccine injuries and deaths , that they threatened to stop producing vaccines unless Congress gave them legal immunity .
Congress obliged , and then President Ronald Reagan signed the bill into law .
After the new law was in place , a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ federal government , and one had to sue for damages due to vaccine injuries and deaths in this special court under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program ( NVICP ) .
To date , BILLIONS of dollars in damages have been paid out to those who have suffered harm and to families who had children die from vaccines , and Health Impact News publishes the quarterly reports from the DOJ listing these settlements , and this information is suppressed as “ fake news ” by the corporate media and Big Tech , even @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
So here we are on the eve of the roll out of hundreds of millions of doses of a new experimental COVID vaccine that has never been in the market yet , and where there will most assuredly be deaths and injuries caused by the side effects .
How will the Vaccine Court handle all these claims that will inevitably result with widespread massive distribution of an experimental vaccine ?
They won ’ t .
Anyone injured or killed by a COVID vaccine will be covered under a different program , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Wayne Rohde , author of the book “ The Vaccine Court , ” explains the difference between the two programs .
In short , if you are injured or have someone killed by one of the new experimental COVID vaccines , expect to pay all of your expenses out-of-pocket , because your life is not worth much to the U.S. Government , and they are asking the public to sacrifice themselves for “ the greater good ” to stop a virus that there is not even an accurate test that can identify @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID-19 vaccines need to be litigated in the NVICP There is a lot of speculation on where any injuries or death suffered by the American public will be adjudicated once COVID-19 vaccines are approved and distributed .
There are two specific and distinctive federal programs that compensate for vaccine injury or death .
The first , the more commonly known of the two , the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program ( NVICP ) and the second , a more secretive program called the CounterMeasures Injury Compensation Program ( CICP ) .
The NVICP @ @ @ @ @ @ @ children and adults that are recommended for normal vaccination .
The CDC via the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices ( ACIP ) will approve a vaccine for administration for children or adults or both .
The Secretary of HHS must announce the intent to add the vaccine to the schedule and allow public comment on the addition .
Congress weighs in to add a $ 0.75 if it is a new class of vaccines .
The Federal Court of Claims will adjudicate the petition for any injury or death .
The petitioner can @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the way up to the Supreme Court if able .
The CICP is entirely different and very problematic .
In the aftermath of the Sept. 11 , 2001 terrorist attacks , Congress created the CounterMeasures program to speed compensation to people injured from drugs , vaccines , and devices developed in response to pandemics and national security events .
A few of the vaccines in that category are for anthrax , ebola , and zika .
The CICP is designed to handle pandemic or other health emergency countermeasures as declared by the Secretary @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the likely landing spot initially for any injuries or deaths alleged as a result of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine .
First , the CICP does not allow the petitioner to seek reimbursement of attorney fees nor medical expert costs .
In the NVICP , these costs are reimbursable even when the petitioner loses as long as the initial claim was shown to have a reasonable basis .
These costs can run on average of $ 35,000 to $ 75,000 and as high as $ 300,000 .
I doubt if many petitioners can afford @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
So you are basically on your own : just you and the Secretary of HHS .
A second reason is that when you submit your petition , copies of your medical records need to be included .
And that is all .
In the NVICP , generally your attorney will also submit research studies , expert reports to support your claim , but not so in the CICP .
A third reason is that if you are one of the very few who have been compensated in the CICP ( 8 % @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pain & suffering , and no award for loss of future wages .
There is in the NVICP , up to $ 250,000 for pain & suffering .
Currently , nearly 74 % of all claims are compensated in the NVICP , granted the vast majority are influenza vaccines administered to adults claiming shoulder injury or Guillain-Barre syndrome ( GBS ) .
A forth reason is that there is no judicial appeal process ; no higher court to appeal .
In the CICP , the appeal process is limited to appealing to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of your petition in the first place .
Renee Gentry , a Washington DC based attorney who practices in the NVICP , was quoted on my podcast Right on Point , with the following : Think about that .
You can listen to the entire podcast with Renee Gentry , Peter Meyers and myself discussing the CICP .
The episode will be released Tuesday prior to Thanksgiving .
Sorry to spoil your family gathering and Turkey Dinner .
But it might be better to listen than participate in a family discussion of politics @ @ @ @ @ @ @ out at RightOnPoint.online .
Sign up for additional podcasts .
A fifth reason is that the decisions are not public .
In the NVICP , the Federal Court of Claims publishes decisions from the Vaccine Court on a daily basis .
In the CICP , there is no public disclosure .
A couple of attorneys and myself have been trying to break down the door and place a spotlight on the decisions .
My FOIA ’ s ranging over the last 8 years have been denied .
And I am not asking for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I am seeking the decisions , the countermeasure in question and the alleged injuries .
That is all .
Soon , we will be marching to Federal Court in hopes of having a judge compel HRSA to turn over these documents .
I think the public has a right to know where their tax dollars are being used .
Speaking of tax dollars , the entire compensation fund for the CICP is not a set aside account that is funded by a levy on vaccines sold .
It is an appropriation from Congress @ @ @ @ @ @ @ as needed .
In the 10 years of existence of the CICP , we have been able to determine the total payout is approximately $ 5.7 million for 39 claims representing 8 % of all petitions filed .
Thanks to Peter Meyers and a response to his FOIA filed earlier this .
The problem facing Congress is how to fund the CICP because of the pending several hundred million doses of COVID-19 to be administered over the course of the next year .
Just multiplying the estimated doses by the ratio of adverse @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will be many , many injuries .
The potential volume of people affected “ will be too much for some unfunded compensation program , ” said Richard Topping , currently chief legal officer of CareSource Management Group Inc. , a Dayton , Ohio-based non-profit that ’ s one of the nation ’ s largest Medicaid-managed health care plans .
Mr .
Topping is a former DOJ attorney that represented the Secretary of HHS in the NVICP .
Another reason why the CICP is a horrible program : the statute of limitations is only @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the NVICP , you have 3 years for injury and 2 years for death .
How many people will develop autoimmune disorders and other medical ailments that might not manifest itself as an injury until it ’ s too late ?
And if you have not determined your medical condition was the result of the COVID-19 vaccine until 9 months later , good luck trying to get ALL of your medical records together and filed with your petition with the short time remaining .
I believe that the short SOL is designed to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ or a couple of weeks from vaccination .
If you develop an autoimmune disorder such as severe asthma or aggravation of an underlying medical condition , you are probably not going to be able to file a petition on time .
Several years ago , there were many petitions originally filed in the NVICP claiming H1N1 vaccine caused a specific medical condition .
The NVICP was so backed up , by the time the HRSA staff processed the petition and forwarded to a Special Master , they could only dismiss because the vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ And the Statute of Limitations ( SOL ) already expired for the petitioner to file in the CICP .
That is not right , not just .
The petitioner was in fact within the SOL .
There are some arguments to keep the COVID-19 injury petitions in the CICP .
Children have been treated horribly in the NVICP regarding their petitions on a whole , as so many have been dismissed .
But the treatment or justice they will receive in the CICP is to be a lot harsher .
In FY2019 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ were adults .
The argument can be made the reason for this was the extreme high number of adult claims filed versus petitions submitted on the behalf of children .
The number of children petitions have been decreasing for the last 7 years .
My data from tracking petitions in the NVICP show the annual number of petitions on behalf of children filed has been decreasing .
What could account for this ?
How about our government deciding that children who suffer seizures and early onset of epilepsy from DTaP are no longer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ from HPV vaccines are rarely compensable .
Parents whose babies die just hours after receiving their 2-month-old vaccines can no longer bring a claim of SIDS .
The courts are making sure the attorneys are not bringing these claims forward and refusing to pay for attorney fees and medical costs .
Thus attorneys are now aggressively screening potential clients and turning many of them away .
To keep it in the CICP will be worse for children AND adults than the treatment their claims will receive in the NVICP .
Without public disclosure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ happening to children and adults who have been harmed by a COVID-19 vaccine .
It appears that the COVID-19 vaccines are here to stay .
They will probably follow the same course as the H1N1 vaccine .
When first introduced , the CICP handled any claims until it was approved to be added into the trivalent flu vaccine which protects against an influenza A ( H1N1 ) virus , an influenza A ( H3N2 ) virus and one influenza B virus .
So if COVID-19 will become a standard vaccine for the American @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have the vaccine be added to the NVICP as soon as possible .
The public needs to know what injuries are occurring as the result of any COVID-19 vaccine .
Wayne Rohde is the author of The Vaccine Court – The Dark Truth to America ’ s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program and The Vaccine Court 2.0 ( release date Jan 19 , 2021 ) www.thevaccinecourt.com Host of Right on Point podcast – a candid legal discussion of the PREP Act , CounterMeasures Injury Comp Program , The Vaccine Court , and legal issues @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on this article at VaccineImpact.com .
[ 1 ] The Rush for a Vaccine Leaves Little Recourse for Anyone It Harms , By Valerie Bauman and Susan Decker [ 2 ] The Rush for a Vaccine Leaves Little Recourse for Anyone It Harms , By Valerie Bauman and Susan Decker Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist ( kidney doctor ) , Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people .
In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real , ethical medicine .
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines , no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public .
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children , and even adults .
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact , part of the Health Impact News network .

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Even before COVID became part of our life here in 2020, very few Americans even knew that a law was passed in 1986 that allowed pharmaceutical companies to not be sued in civil court for injuries and deaths caused by vaccines.
Prior to 1986, the pharmaceutical companies were being sued in court so often from vaccine injuries and deaths, that they threatened to stop producing vaccines unless Congress gave them legal immunity.
Congress obliged, and then President Ronald Reagan signed the bill into law. After the new law was in place, a special Vaccine Court was setup by the federal government, and one had to sue for damages due to vaccine injuries and deaths in this special court under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP).
To date, BILLIONS of dollars in damages have been paid out to those who have suffered harm and to families who had children die from vaccines, and Health Impact News publishes the quarterly reports from the DOJ listing these settlements, and this information is suppressed as “fake news” by the corporate media and Big Tech, even though the source is the U.S. Government.
So here we are on the eve of the roll out of hundreds of millions of doses of a new experimental COVID vaccine that has never been in the market yet, and where there will most assuredly be deaths and injuries caused by the side effects.
How will the Vaccine Court handle all these claims that will inevitably result with widespread massive distribution of an experimental vaccine?
They won’t. Anyone injured or killed by a COVID vaccine will be covered under a different program, the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP).
Wayne Rohde, author of the book “The Vaccine Court,” explains the difference between the two programs.
In short, if you are injured or have someone killed by one of the new experimental COVID vaccines, expect to pay all of your expenses out-of-pocket, because your life is not worth much to the U.S. Government, and they are asking the public to sacrifice themselves for “the greater good” to stop a virus that there is not even an accurate test that can identify it.
Why injuries suffered from the COVID-19 vaccines need to be litigated in the NVICP
by Wayne Rohde
Health Impact News
There is a lot of speculation on where any injuries or death suffered by the American public will be adjudicated once COVID-19 vaccines are approved and distributed.
There are two specific and distinctive federal programs that compensate for vaccine injury or death.
The first, the more commonly known of the two, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) and the second, a more secretive program called the CounterMeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP).
The NVICP provides compensation for the approved vaccines for children and adults that are recommended for normal vaccination.
The CDC via the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) will approve a vaccine for administration for children or adults or both.
The Secretary of HHS must announce the intent to add the vaccine to the schedule and allow public comment on the addition.
Congress weighs in to add a $0.75 if it is a new class of vaccines.
The Federal Court of Claims will adjudicate the petition for any injury or death. The petitioner can appeal to a higher court, all the way up to the Supreme Court if able.
The CICP is entirely different and very problematic.
In the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, Congress created the CounterMeasures program to speed compensation to people injured from drugs, vaccines, and devices developed in response to pandemics and national security events.
Those included biological warfare and radiation poisoning.
A few of the vaccines in that category are for anthrax, ebola, and zika.
The CICP is designed to handle pandemic or other health emergency countermeasures as declared by the Secretary of HHS, and this will be the likely landing spot initially for any injuries or deaths alleged as a result of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine.
First, the CICP does not allow the petitioner to seek reimbursement of attorney fees nor medical expert costs.
In the NVICP, these costs are reimbursable even when the petitioner loses as long as the initial claim was shown to have a reasonable basis.
These costs can run on average of $35,000 to $75,000 and as high as $300,000.
I doubt if many petitioners can afford this cost out of their own pocket. So you are basically on your own: just you and the Secretary of HHS.
A second reason is that when you submit your petition, copies of your medical records need to be included. And that is all.
In the NVICP, generally your attorney will also submit research studies, expert reports to support your claim, but not so in the CICP.
A third reason is that if you are one of the very few who have been compensated in the CICP (8%), there is no award for pain & suffering, and no award for loss of future wages.
There is in the NVICP, up to $250,000 for pain & suffering.
Currently, nearly 74% of all claims are compensated in the NVICP, granted the vast majority are influenza vaccines administered to adults claiming shoulder injury or Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS).
A forth reason is that there is no judicial appeal process; no higher court to appeal.
In the CICP, the appeal process is limited to appealing to the Secretary of HHS who determined the fate of your petition in the first place.
Renee Gentry, a Washington DC based attorney who practices in the NVICP, was quoted on my podcast Right on Point, with the following:
“In the CICP, you have the right to file a petition and lose.”
Think about that.
You can listen to the entire podcast with Renee Gentry, Peter Meyers and myself discussing the CICP. The episode will be released Tuesday prior to Thanksgiving.
Sorry to spoil your family gathering and Turkey Dinner. But it might be better to listen than participate in a family discussion of politics at the dinner table.
Check it out at RightOnPoint.online. Sign up for additional podcasts.
A fifth reason is that the decisions are not public.
In the NVICP, the Federal Court of Claims publishes decisions from the Vaccine Court on a daily basis.
In the CICP, there is no public disclosure.
FOIAS Denied!
A couple of attorneys and myself have been trying to break down the door and place a spotlight on the decisions.
My FOIA’s ranging over the last 8 years have been denied.
And I am not asking for names, addresses or personal information.
I am seeking the decisions, the countermeasure in question and the alleged injuries.
That is all. Soon, we will be marching to Federal Court in hopes of having a judge compel HRSA to turn over these documents.
I think the public has a right to know where their tax dollars are being used.
Speaking of tax dollars, the entire compensation fund for the CICP is not a set aside account that is funded by a levy on vaccines sold. It is an appropriation from Congress to HRSA to pay out any claims as needed.
In the 10 years of existence of the CICP, we have been able to determine the total payout is approximately $ 5.7 million for 39 claims representing 8% of all petitions filed.
Thanks to Peter Meyers and a response to his FOIA filed earlier on this.
The problem facing Congress is how to fund the CICP because of the pending several hundred million doses of COVID-19 to be administered over the course of the next year.
Just multiplying the estimated doses by the ratio of adverse events in the clinical trials suggests there will be many, many injuries.
The potential volume of people affected “will be too much for some unfunded compensation program,” said Richard Topping, currently chief legal officer of CareSource Management Group Inc., a Dayton, Ohio-based non-profit that’s one of the nation’s largest Medicaid-managed health care plans.
Mr. Topping is a former DOJ attorney that represented the Secretary of HHS in the NVICP.
Another reason why the CICP is a horrible program: the statute of limitations is only 1 year, 365 days.
And the clock runs fast.
In the NVICP, you have 3 years for injury and 2 years for death.
How many people will develop autoimmune disorders and other medical ailments that might not manifest itself as an injury until it’s too late?
And if you have not determined your medical condition was the result of the COVID-19 vaccine until 9 months later, good luck trying to get ALL of your medical records together and filed with your petition with the short time remaining.
I believe that the short SOL is designed to only allow injuries that develop within days or a couple of weeks from vaccination.
If you develop an autoimmune disorder such as severe asthma or aggravation of an underlying medical condition, you are probably not going to be able to file a petition on time.
Several years ago, there were many petitions originally filed in the NVICP claiming H1N1 vaccine caused a specific medical condition.
The NVICP was so backed up, by the time the HRSA staff processed the petition and forwarded to a Special Master, they could only dismiss because the vaccine was not included in the NVICP.
And the Statute of Limitations (SOL) already expired for the petitioner to file in the CICP.
That is not right, not just. The petitioner was in fact within the SOL.
There are some arguments to keep the COVID-19 injury petitions in the CICP.
Children have been treated horribly in the NVICP regarding their petitions on a whole, as so many have been dismissed.
But the treatment or justice they will receive in the CICP is to be a lot harsher.
In FY2019, nearly 94% of all compensated claims were adults. The argument can be made the reason for this was the extreme high number of adult claims filed versus petitions submitted on the behalf of children.
The number of children petitions have been decreasing for the last 7 years. My data from tracking petitions in the NVICP show the annual number of petitions on behalf of children filed has been decreasing.
What could account for this?
How about our government deciding that children who suffer seizures and early onset of epilepsy from DTaP are no longer compensable.
Teens who suffer debilitating disorders from HPV vaccines are rarely compensable. Parents whose babies die just hours after receiving their 2-month-old vaccines can no longer bring a claim of SIDS.
The courts are making sure the attorneys are not bringing these claims forward and refusing to pay for attorney fees and medical costs.
Thus attorneys are now aggressively screening potential clients and turning many of them away.
To keep it in the CICP will be worse for children AND adults than the treatment their claims will receive in the NVICP.
Without public disclosure, we will not know what is happening to children and adults who have been harmed by a COVID-19 vaccine.
It appears that the COVID-19 vaccines are here to stay. They will probably follow the same course as the H1N1 vaccine. When first introduced, the CICP handled any claims until it was approved to be added into the trivalent flu vaccine which protects against an influenza A (H1N1) virus, an influenza A (H3N2) virus and one influenza B virus.
So if COVID-19 will become a standard vaccine for the American public, it makes more sense to have the vaccine be added to the NVICP as soon as possible.
The public needs to know what injuries are occurring as the result of any COVID-19 vaccine.
Wayne Rohde is the author of The Vaccine Court – The Dark Truth to America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program and The Vaccine Court 2.0 (release date Jan 19, 2021) www.thevaccinecourt.com
Host of Right on Point podcast – a candid legal discussion of the PREP Act, CounterMeasures Injury Comp Program, The Vaccine Court, and legal issues surrounding the COVID-19 vaccine. www.rightonpoint.online
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.
Notes
[1] The Rush for a Vaccine Leaves Little Recourse for Anyone It Harms, By Valerie Bauman and Susan Decker
August 14, 2020, Bloomberg Law News.
[2] The Rush for a Vaccine Leaves Little Recourse for Anyone It Harms, By Valerie Bauman and Susan Decker
August 14, 2020, Bloomberg Law News.
Book – The Vaccine Court “The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program” ORDER HERE!
See Also:
Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
Order here!
Make a Statement for Health Freedom!
Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children, and even adults.
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact, part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!


healthimpactnews--2020-11-23--“Pandemic is Over” – Former Pfizer Chief Science Officer Says “Second Wave” Faked On False-Positive

“Pandemic is Over” – Former Pfizer Chief Science Officer Says “Second Wave” Faked On False-Positive COVID Tests

This video provides one of the most erudite and informative looks at Covid-19 and the consequences of lockdowns .
As AIER notes , it was remarkable this week to watch as it appeared on YouTube and was forcibly taken down only 2 hours after posting .
In a year of fantastic educational content , this is one of the best we ’ ve seen .
Dr. Michael Yeadon is an Allergy & Respiratory Therapeutic Area expert with 23 years in the pharmaceutical industry .
He trained as a biochemist and pharmacologist , obtaining his PhD from the University of Surrey @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Yeadon then worked at the Wellcome Research Labs with Salvador Moncada with a research focus on airway hyper-responsiveness and effects of pollutants including ozone and working in drug discovery of 5-LO , COX , PAF , NO and lung inflammation .
With colleagues , he was the first to detect exhaled NO in animals and later to induce NOS in lung via allergic triggers .
Joining Pfizer in 1995 , he was responsible for the growth and portfolio delivery of the Allergy & Respiratory pipeline within the company .
He was responsible for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of new molecules , leading teams of up to 200 staff across all disciplines and won an Achievement Award for productivity in 2008 .
Under his leadership the research unit invented oral and inhaled NCEs which delivered multiple positive clinical proofs of concept in asthma , allergic rhinitis and COPD .
He led productive collaborations such as with Rigel Pharmaceuticals ( SYK inhibitors ) and was involved in the licensing of Spiriva and acquisition of the Meridica ( inhaler device ) company .
Dr. Yeadon has published over 40 original research articles and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of biotechnology companies .
Before working with Apellis , Dr. Yeadon was VP and Chief Scientific Officer ( Allergy & Respiratory Research ) with Pfizer .
What likely triggered the Silicon Valley censor-mongers is the fact that a former Chief Science Officer for the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer says “ there is no science to suggest a second wave should happen.
” The “ Big Pharma ” insider asserts that false positive results from inherently unreliable COVID tests are being used to manufacture a “ second wave ” based on “ new cases.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Yeadon warns that half or even “ almost all ” of tests for COVID are false positives .
Dr. Yeadon also argues that the threshold for herd immunity may be much lower than previously thought , and may have been reached in many countries already .
In an interview last week ( see below ) Dr. Yeadon was asked : Even more significantly , even if all positives were to be correct , Dr. Yeadon said that given the “ shape ” of all important indicators in a worldwide pandemic , such as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , “ the pandemic is fundamentally over.
” Yeadon said in the interview : In a paper published this month , which was co-authored by Yeadon and two of his colleagues , “ How Likely is a Second Wave ?
” , the scientists write : In the data for UK , Sweden , the US , and the world , it can be seen that in all cases , deaths were on the rise in March through mid or late April , then began tapering off in a smooth slope which flattened @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to today .
The case rates however , based on testing , rise and swing upwards and downwards wildly .
Media messaging in the US is already ramping up expectations of a “ second wave.
” The survival rate of COVID-19 has been upgraded since May to 99.8 % of infections .
This comes close to ordinary flu , the survival rate of which is 99.9 % .
Although COVID can have serious after-effects , so can flu or any respiratory illness .
The present survival rate is far higher than initial grim @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by Dr. Anthony Fauci , of 94 % , or 20 to 30 times deadlier .
The Infection Fatality Rate ( IFR ) value accepted by Yeadon et al in the paper is .26 % .
The survival rate of a disease is 100 % minus the IFR .
Dr. Yeadon pointed out that the “ novel ” COVID-19 contagion is novel only in the sense that it is a new type of coronavirus .
But , he said , there are presently four strains which circulate freely throughout the population , most @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In the scientific paper , Yeadon et al write : The scientists argue that much of the population already has , if not antibodies to COVID , some level of “ T-cell ” immunity from exposure to other related coronaviruses , which have been circulating long before COVID-19 .
Introducing the idea that some prior immunity to COVID-19 already existed , the authors of “ How Likely is a Second Wave ?
” write : They go on to say that , because of this prior resistance , only 15-25 % of a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reach herd immunity : In the US , accepting a death toll of 200,000 , and a survival rate of 99.8 % , this would mean for every person who has died , there would be about 400 people who had been infected , and lived .
This would translate to around 80 million Americans , or 27 % of the population .
This touches Yeadon ’ s and his colleagues ’ threshold for herd immunity .
Finally , the former Pfizer executive and scientist singles out one former colleague for withering rebuke @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Professor Neil Ferguson .
Ferguson taught at Imperial College while Yeadon was affiliated .
Ferguson ’ s computer model provided the rationale for governments to launch draconian orders which turned free societies into virtual prisons overnight .
Over what is now estimated by the CDC to be a 99.8 % survival rate virus .
Dr. Yeadon said in the interview that “ no serious scientist gives any validity ” to Ferguson ’ s model .
Speaking with thinly-veiled contempt for Ferguson , Dr. Yeadon took special pains to point out to his interviewer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ governments for following Ferguson ’ s model , the assumptions of which all worldwide lockdowns are based on .
One of these scientists is Dr. Johan Giesecke , former chief scientist for the European Center for Disease Control and Prevention , who called Ferguson ’ s model “ the most influential scientific paper ” in memory , and also “ one of the most wrong.
” It was Ferguson ’ s model which held that “ mitigation ” measures were necessary , i.e .
social distancing and business closures , in order to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ million people dying from COVID in the US .
Ferguson predicted that Sweden would pay a terrible price for no lockdown , with 40,000 COVID deaths by May 1 , and 100,000 by June .
Sweden ’ s death count is under 6,000 .
The Swedish government says this coincides to a mild flu season .
Although initially higher , Sweden now has a lower death rate per-capita than the US , which it achieved without the terrific economic damage still ongoing in the US .
Sweden never closed restaurants , bars , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ theaters .
The government never ordered people to wear masks .
Dr. Yeadon speaks bitterly of the lives lost as a result of lockdown policies , and of the “ savable ” countless lives which will be further lost , from important surgeries and other healthcare deferred , should lockdowns be reimposed .
Yeadon ’ s warnings are confirmed by a new study from the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
, summarized succinctly in the following twitter thread from al gato malo ( @ boriquagato ) Anyone still presuming that a Positive PCR @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to read this very carefully : • even 25 cycles of amplification , 70 % of “ positives ” are not “ cases.
” virus can not be cultured .
it ’ s dead .
• the US runs at 40 , 32X the amplification of 35. a lot of people still seem to not understand what this means , so let ’ s lay that out for a minute .
PCR tests look for RNA .
there is too little in your swab .
so they amplify it using a primer based @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of this process doubles the material the US ( and much of the world ) is using a 40 Ct ( cycle threshold ) .
so , 40 doublings , 1 trillion X amplification .
The way that we know this is by running this test , seeing the Ct to find the RNA , and then using the same sample to try to culture virus .
If you can not culture the virus , then the virus is “ dead.
” it ’ s inert .
if it can not replicate , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
it ’ s just traces of virus , remnants , fragments etc PCR is not testing for disease , it ’ s testing for a specific RNA pattern and this is the key pivot When you crank it up to 25 , 70 % of the positive results are not really “ positives ” in any clinical sense .
i hesitate to call it a “ false positive ” because it ’ s really not .
it did find RNA .
but that RNA is not clinically relevant .
It can not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ if 70 % of positives are NCP ’ s at 25 , imagine what 40 looks like .
35 is 1000X as sensitive .
• this study found only 3 % live at 35 no one can culture live virus past about 34 and we have known this since march .
yet no one has adjusted these tests .
This is more very strong data refuting the idea that you can trust a PCR+ as a clinical indicator .
That is NOT what it ’ s meant for .
at all .
Using @ @ @ @ @ @ @ absurd .
The FDA would never do it , the drug companies doing vaccine trials would never do it… it ’ s because it ’ s nonsense .
And this same test is used for “ hospitalizations ” and “ death with covid ” ( itself a weirdly over inclusive metric ) PCR testing is not the answer , it ’ s the problem .
It ’ s not how to get control of an epidemic , it ’ s how to completely lose control of your data picture and wind up with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ourselves before .
A quick word what this data does and does not mean .
Saying “ a sample requiring 35 Ct to test + has a 3 % real clinical positive rate ” does not mean “ 97 % of + tests run at 35 Ct are NCP ’ s ” People seem to get confused on this , so lets explain : Most tests are just amplified and run .
they don ’ t test every cycle as these academics do .
that would make the test slow and expensive , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ test .
Obviously , a real clinical positive ( RCP ) that would have been + at 20 is still + at 40. but when you run the tests each cycle as the academics do , that test would already have dropped out .
so saying that only 3 % at 35 are RCP really means that 3 % of those samples not PCR + at 34 were PCR and RCP + at 35. this lets us infer little about overall NCP/RCP rate .
so we can not say “ at 25 Ct @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” in fact , it ’ s hard to say much of anything .
it depends entirely on what the source material coming in looks like .
you can not even compare like to like .
This is what i mean by “ the data is gibberish ” Today at 40 Ct , 7 % PCR positive rate could be 1 % RCP prevalence when that same thing meant 6 % RCP prev in april .
If there is lots more trace virus around , more people who have recovered and have fragments @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be finding virus you killed 4 months ago .
So if we consider RCP rate/PCR+ rate , we would expect that number to drop sharply late in an epidemic because there is more dead virus around for PCR to find , but we have no idea what that ratio is or how it changes .
This spills over in to deaths , reported hospitalization etc .
Testing is being made out to be like the high beams on a car , but when it ’ s snowing like hell at night , that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ It is not illuminating our way , it ’ s blinding us .
A bad inaccurate map is much worse than no map at all , and this is a world class bad map… We ’ re basing policy that is affecting billions of humans on data that is uninterpretable gibberish .
It ’ s a deranged technocrat ’ s wet dream , but for those of us along for the ride , it ’ s a nightmare .
Testing is not the solution , it ’ s the problem .
Any technocrat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by now is either unfit for their job or has decided that they just don ’ t care and prefer power to morality .
This is , of curse , precisely the kind of person who winds up running a gov ’ t agency… oopsie .
The head of the NIH is not the best scientist , it ’ s the best politician .
All this wild and reckless government policy has never been about the science .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create @ @ @

by Tyler Durden
ZeroHedge News
This video provides one of the most erudite and informative looks at Covid-19 and the consequences of lockdowns. As AIER notes, it was remarkable this week to watch as it appeared on YouTube and was forcibly taken down only 2 hours after posting.
(There are several copies on Bitchute, and we have included one below.)
In a year of fantastic educational content, this is one of the best we’ve seen.
Consider the presenter’s bio:
Dr. Michael Yeadon is an Allergy & Respiratory Therapeutic Area expert with 23 years in the pharmaceutical industry. He trained as a biochemist and pharmacologist, obtaining his PhD from the University of Surrey (UK) in 1988. Dr. Yeadon then worked at the Wellcome Research Labs with Salvador Moncada with a research focus on airway hyper-responsiveness and effects of pollutants including ozone and working in drug discovery of 5-LO, COX, PAF, NO and lung inflammation. With colleagues, he was the first to detect exhaled NO in animals and later to induce NOS in lung via allergic triggers. Joining Pfizer in 1995, he was responsible for the growth and portfolio delivery of the Allergy & Respiratory pipeline within the company. He was responsible for target selection and the progress into humans of new molecules, leading teams of up to 200 staff across all disciplines and won an Achievement Award for productivity in 2008. Under his leadership the research unit invented oral and inhaled NCEs which delivered multiple positive clinical proofs of concept in asthma, allergic rhinitis and COPD. He led productive collaborations such as with Rigel Pharmaceuticals (SYK inhibitors) and was involved in the licensing of Spiriva and acquisition of the Meridica (inhaler device) company. Dr. Yeadon has published over 40 original research articles and now consults and partners with a number of biotechnology companies. Before working with Apellis, Dr. Yeadon was VP and Chief Scientific Officer (Allergy & Respiratory Research) with Pfizer.
What likely triggered the Silicon Valley censor-mongers is the fact that a former Chief Science Officer for the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer says “there is no science to suggest a second wave should happen.” The “Big Pharma” insider asserts that false positive results from inherently unreliable COVID tests are being used to manufacture a “second wave” based on “new cases.”
As Ralph Lopez write at HubPages, Yeadon warns that half or even “almost all” of tests for COVID are false positives. Dr. Yeadon also argues that the threshold for herd immunity may be much lower than previously thought, and may have been reached in many countries already.
In an interview last week (see below) Dr. Yeadon was asked:
“we are basing a government policy, an economic policy, a civil liberties policy, in terms of limiting people to six people in a meeting…all based on, what may well be, completely fake data on this coronavirus?”
Dr. Yeadon answered with a simple “yes.”
Even more significantly, even if all positives were to be correct, Dr. Yeadon said that given the “shape” of all important indicators in a worldwide pandemic, such as hospitalizations, ICU utilization, and deaths, “the pandemic is fundamentally over.”
Yeadon said in the interview:
“Were it not for the test data that you get from the TV all the time, you would rightly conclude that the pandemic was over, as nothing much has happened. Of course people go to the hospital, moving into the autumn flu season…but there is no science to suggest a second wave should happen.”
In a paper published this month, which was co-authored by Yeadon and two of his colleagues, “How Likely is a Second Wave?”, the scientists write:
“It has widely been observed that in all heavily infected countries in Europe and several of the US states likewise, that the shape of the daily deaths vs. time curves is similar to ours in the UK. Many of these curves are not just similar, but almost super imposable.“
In the data for UK, Sweden, the US, and the world, it can be seen that in all cases, deaths were on the rise in March through mid or late April, then began tapering off in a smooth slope which flattened around the end of June and continues to today. The case rates however, based on testing, rise and swing upwards and downwards wildly.
Media messaging in the US is already ramping up expectations of a “second wave.”
The survival rate of COVID-19 has been upgraded since May to 99.8% of infections. This comes close to ordinary flu, the survival rate of which is 99.9%. Although COVID can have serious after-effects, so can flu or any respiratory illness. The present survival rate is far higher than initial grim guesses in March and April, cited by Dr. Anthony Fauci, of 94%, or 20 to 30 times deadlier. The Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) value accepted by Yeadon et al in the paper is .26%. The survival rate of a disease is 100% minus the IFR.
Dr. Yeadon pointed out that the “novel” COVID-19 contagion is novel only in the sense that it is a new type of coronavirus. But, he said, there are presently four strains which circulate freely throughout the population, most often linked to the common cold.
In the scientific paper, Yeadon et al write:
“There are at least four well characterised family members (229E, NL63, OC43 and HKU1) which are endemic and cause some of the common colds we experience, especially in winter. They all have striking sequence similarity to the new coronavirus.”
The scientists argue that much of the population already has, if not antibodies to COVID, some level of “T-cell” immunity from exposure to other related coronaviruses, which have been circulating long before COVID-19.
The scientists write:
“A major component our immune systems is the group of white blood cells called T-cells whose job it is to memorise a short piece of whatever virus we were infected with so the right cell types can multiply rapidly and protect us if we get a related infection. Responses to COVID-19 have been shown in dozens of blood samples taken from donors before the new virus arrived.”
Introducing the idea that some prior immunity to COVID-19 already existed, the authors of “How Likely is a Second Wave?” write:
“It is now established that at least 30% of our population already had immunological recognition of this new virus, before it even arrived…COVID-19 is new, but coronaviruses are not.”
They go on to say that, because of this prior resistance, only 15-25% of a population being infected may be sufficient to reach herd immunity:
“…epidemiological studies show that, with the extent of prior immunity that we can now reasonably assume to be the case, only 15-25% of the population being infected is sufficient to bring the spread of the virus to a halt…”
In the US, accepting a death toll of 200,000, and a survival rate of 99.8%, this would mean for every person who has died, there would be about 400 people who had been infected, and lived. This would translate to around 80 million Americans, or 27% of the population. This touches Yeadon’s and his colleagues’ threshold for herd immunity.
Finally, the former Pfizer executive and scientist singles out one former colleague for withering rebuke for his role in the pandemic, Professor Neil Ferguson. Ferguson taught at Imperial College while Yeadon was affiliated.
Ferguson’s computer model provided the rationale for governments to launch draconian orders which turned free societies into virtual prisons overnight. Over what is now estimated by the CDC to be a 99.8% survival rate virus.
Dr. Yeadon said in the interview that “no serious scientist gives any validity” to Ferguson’s model.
Speaking with thinly-veiled contempt for Ferguson, Dr. Yeadon took special pains to point out to his interviewer:
“It’s important that you know most scientists don’t accept that it [Ferguson’s model] was even faintly right…but the government is still wedded to the model.”
Yeadon joins other scientists in castigating governments for following Ferguson’s model, the assumptions of which all worldwide lockdowns are based on. One of these scientists is Dr. Johan Giesecke, former chief scientist for the European Center for Disease Control and Prevention, who called Ferguson’s model “the most influential scientific paper” in memory, and also “one of the most wrong.”
It was Ferguson’s model which held that “mitigation” measures were necessary, i.e. social distancing and business closures, in order to prevent, for example, over 2.2 million people dying from COVID in the US.
Ferguson predicted that Sweden would pay a terrible price for no lockdown, with 40,000 COVID deaths by May 1, and 100,000 by June. Sweden’s death count is under 6,000.
The Swedish government says this coincides to a mild flu season. Although initially higher, Sweden now has a lower death rate per-capita than the US, which it achieved without the terrific economic damage still ongoing in the US. Sweden never closed restaurants, bars, sports, most schools, or movie theaters. The government never ordered people to wear masks.
Dr. Yeadon speaks bitterly of the lives lost as a result of lockdown policies, and of the “savable” countless lives which will be further lost, from important surgeries and other healthcare deferred, should lockdowns be reimposed.
Watch the full discussion below:
Yeadon’s warnings are confirmed by a new study from the Infectious Diseases Society of America., summarized succinctly in the following twitter thread from al gato malo (@boriquagato)
Anyone still presuming that a Positive PCR test is showing a COVID case needs to read this very carefully:
even 25 cycles of amplification, 70% of “positives” are not “cases.” virus cannot be cultured. it’s dead.
by 35: 97% non-clinical.
the US runs at 40, 32X the amplification of 35.
a lot of people still seem to not understand what this means, so let’s lay that out for a minute.
PCR tests look for RNA. there is too little in your swab. so they amplify it using a primer based heating and annealing process.
Each cycle of this process doubles the material
the US (and much of the world) is using a 40 Ct (cycle threshold). so, 40 doublings, 1 trillion X amplification.
This is absurdly high.
The way that we know this is by running this test, seeing the Ct to find the RNA, and then using the same sample to try to culture virus.
If you cannot culture the virus, then the virus is “dead.” it’s inert. if it cannot replicate, it cannot infect you or others. it’s just traces of virus, remnants, fragments etc
PCR is not testing for disease, it’s testing for a specific RNA pattern and this is the key pivot
When you crank it up to 25, 70% of the positive results are not really “positives” in any clinical sense.
i hesitate to call it a “false positive” because it’s really not. it did find RNA.
but that RNA is not clinically relevant.
It cannot make you or anyone else sick
so let’s call this a non-clinical positive (NCP).
if 70% of positives are NCP’s at 25, imagine what 40 looks like. 35 is 1000X as sensitive.
this study found only 3% live at 35
40 Ct is 32X 35, 32,000X 25
no one can culture live virus past about 34 and we have known this since march. yet no one has adjusted these tests.
This is more very strong data refuting the idea that you can trust a PCR+ as a clinical indicator.
That is NOT what it’s meant for. at all.
Using them to do real time epidemiology is absurd.
The FDA would never do it, the drug companies doing vaccine trials would never do it… it’s because it’s nonsense.
And this same test is used for “hospitalizations” and “death with covid” (itself a weirdly over inclusive metric)
PCR testing is not the answer, it’s the problem.
It’s not how to get control of an epidemic, it’s how to completely lose control of your data picture and wind up with gibberish and we have done this to ourselves before.
A quick word what this data does and does not mean.
Saying “a sample requiring 35 Ct to test + has a 3% real clinical positive rate” does not mean “97% of + tests run at 35 Ct are NCP’s”
People seem to get confused on this, so lets explain:
Most tests are just amplified and run. they don’t test every cycle as these academics do. that would make the test slow and expensive, so you just run 40 cycles then test.
Obviously, a real clinical positive (RCP) that would have been + at 20 is still + at 40.
but when you run the tests each cycle as the academics do, that test would already have dropped out.
so saying that only 3% at 35 are RCP really means that 3% of those samples not PCR + at 34 were PCR and RCP + at 35.
this lets us infer little about overall NCP/RCP rate.
so we cannot say “at 25 Ct, we have a 70 NCP rate.” in fact, it’s hard to say much of anything. it depends entirely on what the source material coming in looks like.
you cannot even compare like to like.
This is what i mean by “the data is gibberish”
Today at 40 Ct, 7% PCR positive rate could be 1% RCP prevalence when that same thing meant 6% RCP prev in april.
If there is lots more trace virus around, more people who have recovered and have fragments left over, etc this test could be finding virus you killed 4 months ago.
So if we consider RCP rate/PCR+ rate, we would expect that number to drop sharply late in an epidemic because there is more dead virus around for PCR to find, but we have no idea what that ratio is or how it changes.
This spills over in to deaths, reported hospitalization etc.
Testing is being made out to be like the high beams on a car, but when it’s snowing like hell at night, that is the LAST thing you want. It is not illuminating our way, it’s blinding us.
A bad inaccurate map is much worse than no map at all, and this is a world class bad map…
We’re basing policy that is affecting billions of humans on data that is uninterpretable gibberish.
It’s a deranged technocrat’s wet dream, but for those of us along for the ride, it’s a nightmare.
Testing is not the solution, it’s the problem.
Any technocrat or scientist that does not know this by now is either unfit for their job or has decided that they just don’t care and prefer power to morality.
This is, of curse, precisely the kind of person who winds up running a gov’t agency… oopsie.
The head of the NIH is not the best scientist, it’s the best politician.
All this wild and reckless government policy has never been about the science.
It’s politics and panic.
Read the full article at ZeroHedge News.
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-11-26--Doctors Urge the CDC to Make the Public Aware of Painful Side Effects of Experimental COVID-19 Vacci

Doctors Urge the CDC to Make the Public Aware of Painful Side Effects of Experimental COVID-19 Vaccines

A group of doctors is urging the Center for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC ) to make the public aware of the painful side effects that will come with the experimental COVID-19 vaccines that have been rushed through the testing process .
Dr. Sandra Fryhofer of the American Medical Association ( AMA ) is worried that lying to the public will cause them not to pursue the full COVID-19 vaccine treatment , which is expected to take at least two doses .
“ We really need to make patients aware that this is not going to be a walk @ @ @ @ @ @ @ during a virtual meeting with the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices ( ACIP ) , a group of outside medical experts tasked with advising the CDC .
“ They are going to know they had a vaccine .
They are probably not going to feel wonderful .
But they ’ ve got to come back for that second dose.
” Dr. Nancy Messonnier , who works as director of the CDC ’ s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases , says their agency is working on providing a guidance of sorts for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the COVID-19 vaccines .
However , the CDC does not seem too concerned about educating the public about the dangers of these experimental vaccines .
Big League Politics reported months ago on how initial guinea pigs for these shots experienced horrific side effects .
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist ( kidney doctor ) , Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real , ethical medicine .
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines , no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public .
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children , and even adults .
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact , part of the Health Impact News network @

by Shane Trejo
Big League Politics
Excerpts:
A group of doctors is urging the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to make the public aware of the painful side effects that will come with the experimental COVID-19 vaccines that have been rushed through the testing process.
Dr. Sandra Fryhofer of the American Medical Association (AMA) is worried that lying to the public will cause them not to pursue the full COVID-19 vaccine treatment, which is expected to take at least two doses.
“We really need to make patients aware that this is not going to be a walk in the park,” Fryhofer said during a virtual meeting with the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), a group of outside medical experts tasked with advising the CDC. “They are going to know they had a vaccine. They are probably not going to feel wonderful. But they’ve got to come back for that second dose.”
Dr. Nancy Messonnier, who works as director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, says their agency is working on providing a guidance of sorts for health care officials about the side-effects of the COVID-19 vaccines.
However, the CDC does not seem too concerned about educating the public about the dangers of these experimental vaccines. Big League Politics reported months ago on how initial guinea pigs for these shots experienced horrific side effects.
Read the full article at Big League Politics.
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.
See Also:
Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Book – The Vaccine Court “The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program” ORDER HERE!
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
Order here!
Make a Statement for Health Freedom!
Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children, and even adults.
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact, part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!


healthimpactnews--2020-11-26--Vaccinated Children Are Sicker, Study Shows

Breaking science news : Vaccinated children are sicker than their unvaccinated peers , according to a landmark new study on vaccine safety : “ Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination.
” For over two decades , vaccine safety advocates have wondered if vaccinated children are sicker or healthier than their unvaccinated peers .
These children ’ s health advocates have asked the CDC to conduct studies to compare health outcomes in completely unvaccinated children to those in vaccinated children , as per the CDC ’ s recommended schedule .
Every @ @ @ @ @ @ @ recommending vaccines , should want to see these studies done .
After all , in order to put the vaccine debates to rest , we must demonstrate that the current CDC-recommended vaccine schedule is actually safe .
But , despite constant hand-wringing over declining public confidence in vaccines , the CDC refuses to do these studies .
James Lyons-Weiler , Ph.D. and Paul Thomas , M.D.
’ s analysis is scrupulous and thorough .
They analyzed the data several different ways to account for potentially confounding factors , such as an increasing tendency @ @ @ @ @ @ @ new metric ( RIOV ) with the old measure of incidence .
And they found that the new method correlates well but is more sensitive , thus more likely to reveal a true negative effect than the old one .
So what did Drs .
Lyons-Weiler and Thomas find ?
The results : cumulative office visits for asthma , allergic rhinitis , breathing issues , behavioral issues , ADHD , respiratory infection , otitis media , ear pain , other infections , eye disorders , eczema , and dermatitis were all much higher @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In even the most conservative analysis , the study finds statistically significant elevated risks of anemia and respiratory virus infection in the vaccinated children .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist ( kidney doctor ) , Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people .
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real , ethical medicine .
One of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the science behind modern-day vaccines , no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public .
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children , and even adults .
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact , part of the Health Impact News network .

by Jennifer Margulis, Ph.D.
JenniferMargulis.net
Excerpts:
Breaking science news: Vaccinated children are sicker than their unvaccinated peers, according to a landmark new study on vaccine safety: “Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination.”
For over two decades, vaccine safety advocates have wondered if vaccinated children are sicker or healthier than their unvaccinated peers. These children’s health advocates have asked the CDC to conduct studies to compare health outcomes in completely unvaccinated children to those in vaccinated children, as per the CDC’s recommended schedule.
Every parent in America, and every doctor recommending vaccines, should want to see these studies done.
After all, in order to put the vaccine debates to rest, we must demonstrate that the current CDC-recommended vaccine schedule is actually safe.
But, despite constant hand-wringing over declining public confidence in vaccines, the CDC refuses to do these studies.
James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D. and Paul Thomas, M.D.’s analysis is scrupulous and thorough. They analyzed the data several different ways to account for potentially confounding factors, such as an increasing tendency to avoid vaccination. They compared the new metric (RIOV) with the old measure of incidence. And they found that the new method correlates well but is more sensitive, thus more likely to reveal a true negative effect than the old one.
So what did Drs. Lyons-Weiler and Thomas find?
The results: cumulative office visits for asthma, allergic rhinitis, breathing issues, behavioral issues, ADHD, respiratory infection, otitis media, ear pain, other infections, eye disorders, eczema, and dermatitis were all much higher in vaccinated children than unvaccinated children.
In even the most conservative analysis, the study finds statistically significant elevated risks of anemia and respiratory virus infection in the vaccinated children.
Read the full article at JenniferMargulis.net.
Comment on this article VaccineImpact.com.
See Also:
Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Book – The Vaccine Court “The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program” ORDER HERE!
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
Order here!
Make a Statement for Health Freedom!
Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children, and even adults.
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact, part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!


healthimpactnews--2020-11-25--‘No evidence’ that asymptomatic Covid-19 cases were infectious, analysis of post-lockdown Wuhan conc

‘No evidence’ that asymptomatic Covid-19 cases were infectious, analysis of post-lockdown Wuhan concludes

A paper that analyzed the results of a massive post-lockdown Covid-19 testing drive that included nearly every eligible resident of Wuhan , China has found no evidence that positive cases without symptoms spread the disease .
The analysis , published in the scientific journal Nature , looked at the results of a screening initiative held between May and June in Wuhan , the city where the first cases of the novel coronavirus were detected in late 2019 .
The origins of the virus have yet to be determined , with new studies suggesting that the disease could have been in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Nearly 10 million people were tested , consisting of 92 percent of all residents aged six years or older .
Incredibly , no new symptomatic cases were registered , and only 300 asymptomatic cases were detected .
Subsequent tests of 1,174 close contacts of the asymptomatic cases found resulted in no new positives .
There is “ no evidence that the identified asymptomatic positive cases were infectious , ” the paper said , adding that the results of the massive screening program could help health authorities “ adjust prevention and control strategies @ @ @ @ @ @

by RT.com
Excerpts:
A paper that analyzed the results of a massive post-lockdown Covid-19 testing drive that included nearly every eligible resident of Wuhan, China has found no evidence that positive cases without symptoms spread the disease.
The analysis, published in the scientific journal Nature, looked at the results of a screening initiative held between May and June in Wuhan, the city where the first cases of the novel coronavirus were detected in late 2019. The origins of the virus have yet to be determined, with new studies suggesting that the disease could have been in Italy as early as September last year.
Nearly 10 million people were tested, consisting of 92 percent of all residents aged six years or older.
Incredibly, no new symptomatic cases were registered, and only 300 asymptomatic cases were detected. Subsequent tests of 1,174 close contacts of the asymptomatic cases found resulted in no new positives.
There is “no evidence that the identified asymptomatic positive cases were infectious,” the paper said, adding that the results of the massive screening program could help health authorities “adjust prevention and control strategies in the post-lockdown period.”
Read the full article at RT.com.


healthimpactnews--2020-11-25--New Mexico Governor Shuts Down Grocery Stores for Two Weeks

A dozen grocery stores around the state have been forced to close for two weeks because of a public health order issued by Gov .
Michelle Lujan Grisham at a time when the state ’ s residents are suffering from record high unemployment and food insecurity , critics say .
The order requires businesses with four or more rapid responses of COVID-19 cases reported within in a 14-day period to close for two weeks .
More than 25 essential businesses were shut down as of Monday afternoon , including a number of grocery stores and major retailers .
The closures @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in Santa Fe , an Albertson ’ s in Roswell , a Smiths Food & Drug Center in Albuquerque and New Mexico Food Distribution Center in Albuquerque .
The state ’ s environment department has published a complete list of businesses that have been closed due to employees testing positive for COVID-19 , as well as a watch list , and FAQ about the watch list .
Access to purchase food is now limited because of another order issued by the governor requiring capacity limitations at all stores .
New Mexicans are now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up to two hours , local news reports indicate , which the governor ’ s office has disputed .
The governor ’ s office said , “ The state is not forcing anyone to stand in a crowded line , as you suggest , ” in response to requests for comment from KOB4 News TV .
But John Block at PInon Post says the governor ’ s office claims are “ untrue and easily disprovable.
” He posted photos of New Mexicans waiting in long lines outside of grocery stores with dates and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ between Nov. 13 and Nov. 23 .
Read the full article at the Washington Examiner .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

by Bethany Blankley
Washington Examiner
Excerpts:
A dozen grocery stores around the state have been forced to close for two weeks because of a public health order issued by Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham at a time when the state’s residents are suffering from record high unemployment and food insecurity, critics say.
The order requires businesses with four or more rapid responses of COVID-19 cases reported within in a 14-day period to close for two weeks.
More than 25 essential businesses were shut down as of Monday afternoon, including a number of grocery stores and major retailers.
The closures include two Walmarts in Albuquerque and one in Santa Fe, an Albertson’s in Roswell, a Smiths Food & Drug Center in Albuquerque and New Mexico Food Distribution Center in Albuquerque.
The state’s environment department has published a complete list of businesses that have been closed due to employees testing positive for COVID-19, as well as a watch list, and FAQ about the watch list.
Access to purchase food is now limited because of another order issued by the governor requiring capacity limitations at all stores. New Mexicans are now waiting outside, standing in line for up to two hours, local news reports indicate, which the governor’s office has disputed.
The governor’s office said, “The state is not forcing anyone to stand in a crowded line, as you suggest,” in response to requests for comment from KOB4 News TV.
But John Block at PInon Post says the governor’s office claims are “untrue and easily disprovable.” He posted photos of New Mexicans waiting in long lines outside of grocery stores with dates and time stamps. The photos were taken between Nov. 13 and Nov. 23.
Read the full article at the Washington Examiner.
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-11-24--German Lawsuit Against “FactCheckers” Will Force Them To Prove Legitimacy of COVID Tests

We have previously published the work of Dr. Reiner Fuellmich , an attorney based out of Germany .
In an interview last month , October , 2020 , Dr. Fuellmich stated that those behind what he refers to as the “ Corona Scandal ” have committed crimes against humanity , and that those responsible for it must be criminally prosecuted and sued for civil damages .
See : Testimony of German Attorney : Those Responsible for “ Corona Scandal ” Must be Criminally Prosecuted for Crimes Against Humanity Dr. Fuellmich was recently interviewed by journalist Ben Swann of RT.com to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ FactCheckers.
” This is a defamation lawsuit , since Dr. Fuellmich works with many scientists and doctors in Europe who have been censored because they do not promote the Globalists ’ narrative on COVID .
This includes the doctor we featured in yesterday ’ s newsletter , Dr. Michael Yeadon , the former Pfizer Chief Science Officer .
See : “ Pandemic is Over ” – Former Pfizer Chief Science Officer Says “ Second Wave ” Faked On False-Positive COVID Tests The plaintiff in Dr. Fuellmich ’ s lawsuit against the FactCheckers @ @ @ @ @ @ @ years ago exposed the fraud behind the “ Swine Flu.
” He was a member of the German Parliament at the time , as well as a member of the Council of Europe .
Today , Dr. Wodarg ’ s criticisms of the PCR tests which are being used to lockdown the world over COVID , are being censored by these “ FactCheckers.
” So Dr. Fuellmich believes that their lawsuit against these “ FactCheckers ” will put the burden of proof on them to prove that the PCR test is accurate , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ used as a template for similar lawsuits in other countries around the world .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
We have previously published the work of Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, an attorney based out of Germany. In an interview last month, October, 2020, Dr. Fuellmich stated that those behind what he refers to as the “Corona Scandal” have committed crimes against humanity, and that those responsible for it must be criminally prosecuted and sued for civil damages. See:
Dr. Fuellmich was recently interviewed by journalist Ben Swann of RT.com to discuss his latest lawsuit against the Facebook “FactCheckers.”
This is a defamation lawsuit, since Dr. Fuellmich works with many scientists and doctors in Europe who have been censored because they do not promote the Globalists’ narrative on COVID. This includes the doctor we featured in yesterday’s newsletter, Dr. Michael Yeadon, the former Pfizer Chief Science Officer. See:
The plaintiff in Dr. Fuellmich’s lawsuit against the FactCheckers is Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, who 12 years ago exposed the fraud behind the “Swine Flu.” He was a member of the German Parliament at the time, as well as a member of the Council of Europe.
Today, Dr. Wodarg’s criticisms of the PCR tests which are being used to lockdown the world over COVID, are being censored by these “FactCheckers.”
So Dr. Fuellmich believes that their lawsuit against these “FactCheckers” will put the burden of proof on them to prove that the PCR test is accurate, and that this lawsuit can then be used as a template for similar lawsuits in other countries around the world.
Watch the full discussion:
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-11-24--If You Are Advocating for Lockdowns and Complying, You Are Complicit with MASS MURDER

What NO ONE is Saying About The Lockdowns Those advocating for lockdowns have seen the destruction and death that those policies have wrought this year and we are living through that right now .
Not only are people being deprived of their livelihoods and forced into grinding poverty as a direct result of these shutdowns , but now the undeniable truth is that if you are advocating for lockdowns , you are advocating for some portion of the population to be consigned to death .
This is no longer debatable .
It is even openly admitted—although months too late by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have managed to retain your sanity during this time of widespread insanity , I applaud you and wish to assure you that you are not alone .
Many , many people all around the world are defying orders .
They are protesting against these lockdowns .
They are standing up .
They are disobeying .
But of course the corporate controlled press don ’ t want you to know that disobedience is an option on the table and they will not report on this .
But disobedience is an option .
Open your @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not ask for permission .
Disobey .
To those who are still advocating for lockdowns , I encourage you to do so to the face of those parents who have lost their teenage children due to suicide as a direct result of the shutdowns and tell them that their child ’ s death doesn ’ t matter because it wasn ’ t listed as being due to COVID-19 .
Or do so to the face of the tens of thousands of others who have already lost loved ones as a direct result of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ more who will die as long as these lockdowns endure .
If you are advocating for lockdowns , you are complicit in tearing families apart .
You are complicit in inflicting untold suffering on millions of people around the world .
You are complicit in casting the poorest and most vulnerable in our societies into even further grinding poverty .
You are complicit in murder .
Government , the governors , the mayors , a whole bunch of layers of these parasitic idiots are commanding and threatening to fine and imprison people for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ problem worse .
They are forcing people to make the problem worse .
When government forces people to do something destructive that will get other people killed , the governors of the states are forcing people to do things that will get tens of thousands or millions killed !
Let me be perfectly clear .
If government orders you to do something which puts innocent lives in jeopardy , DISOBEY THE # % * & # @ !
GOVERNMENT !
!
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet @ @ @ @ @ @

What NO ONE is Saying About The Lockdowns
by James Corbett
The Corbett Report
Excerpts:
Those advocating for lockdowns have seen the destruction and death that those policies have wrought this year and we are living through that right now.
Not only are people being deprived of their livelihoods and forced into grinding poverty as a direct result of these shutdowns, but now the undeniable truth is that if you are advocating for lockdowns, you are advocating for some portion of the population to be consigned to death.
This is no longer debatable. It is even openly admitted—although months too late by the World Health Organization.
If you have managed to retain your sanity during this time of widespread insanity, I applaud you and wish to assure you that you are not alone. Many, many people all around the world are defying orders. They are protesting against these lockdowns. They are standing up. They are disobeying.
But of course the corporate controlled press don’t want you to know that disobedience is an option on the table and they will not report on this. But disobedience is an option. Open your business. Leave your home. Do not ask for permission. Disobey.
To those who are still advocating for lockdowns, I encourage you to do so to the face of those parents who have lost their teenage children due to suicide as a direct result of the shutdowns and tell them that their child’s death doesn’t matter because it wasn’t listed as being due to COVID-19. Or do so to the face of the tens of thousands of others who have already lost loved ones as a direct result of these shutdown or the hundreds of thousands more who will die as long as these lockdowns endure.
If you are advocating for lockdowns, you are complicit in tearing families apart. You are complicit in inflicting untold suffering on millions of people around the world. You are complicit in casting the poorest and most vulnerable in our societies into even further grinding poverty. You are complicit in murder.
Watch the Full Report:
Shutdowns: Stupid, Pointless and Evil
by Larken Rose
(Editor’s note: While this was recorded back in April, it is even MORE applicable today as the Globalists try to force the world into a second lockdown.)
Quotes:
Government, the governors, the mayors, a whole bunch of layers of these parasitic idiots are commanding and threatening to fine and imprison people for not doing things that will make the problem worse. They are forcing people to make the problem worse. When government forces people to do something destructive that will get other people killed, the governors of the states are forcing people to do things that will get tens of thousands or millions killed! Let me be perfectly clear. If government orders you to do something which puts innocent lives in jeopardy, DISOBEY THE #%*@! GOVERNMENT!!
Watch the full talk:
See Also: