healthimpactnews--2020-05-07--“Educational Neglect” being used Against Poor Parents if Children do Not “Attend” Online Classes

Are you a parent who just can ’ t handle the demands of your own work , the stress of coronavirus and educating your child from home while schools are closed ?
If you ’ re middle-class you can get indulgence , sympathy and helpful hints .
Your kids can “ play Fortnite for the next eight hours.
” If you ’ re poor you can get a caseworker at the door investigating you for “ educational neglect.
” All over America , parents are finding out just how hard it is to be a teacher – particularly when it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ has to master new technology and new lessons at the same time .
The New York Times feels your pain .
In a story filled with examples of middle-class parents struggling to cope – or even giving up – the story declares : If you ’ re middle class , not bad at all .
In fact , you can give up entirely !
Again , from the story : Yes , that ’ s right – if you ’ re white and middle class you can announce to the whole world that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ grade ” and not have to worry .
It ’ s similar to how middle-class moms can brag about using marijuana .
To the surprise of , I ’ m guessing , pretty much no one , whether its pot or education , it doesn ’ t work that way if you ’ re poor .
Shortly after New York City schools closed , I started hearing rumors that schools were actually calling in “ educational neglect ” reports on parents when their kids didn ’ t “ show up for class ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ every child living in poverty has immediate access to all the necessary technology , right ?
And what could be better for kids and families in this time of stress than a caseworker from the city ’ s Administration for Children ’ s Services caseworker showing up at the door ?
Thanks to some good reporting from Eileen Grench at the online news site The City , now we know : The rumors were true .
From Grench ’ s story : The city ’ s Department of Education ( DOE ) says @ @ @ @ @ @ @ first to see if the problem is lack of technology .
But teachers are mandated reporters – subject to severe penalties if they don ’ t report .
So it ’ s easier – for them – to just call in the report .
All this is on top of the fact that there is abundant evidence that “ educational neglect ” is so useless when it comes to finding actual child abuse , so harmful to children , families and to education , and so easily abused , that it probably should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reported to child protective services at all .
Read the full article at the National Coalition for Child Protection Reform .
Comment on this article at MedicalKidnap.com .
An environmentally relevant concentration of Roundup caused changes in the gut microbiome of rats , according to a new study published by the group of Prof Gilles-Eric Séralini at the University of Caen , France .
Our analysis of the study ( see abstract below ) and its findings follows .
Analyses were carried out of the faecal samples from rats used in the long-term @ @ @ @ @ @ @ animals per Roundup treatment group were analysed for gut microbiome .
In addition , bacteria were grown in vitro from the faeces of control animals and treated with increasing concentrations of Roundup .
The main findings were a sex-specific alteration in the gut microbiome of female rats only , tested in vivo .
Specifically , there was an increase in the Bacteroidetes family S24-7 and a decrease in the Lactobacillacea family of bacteria .
The same gut microbiome alterations were observed in vivo at all of the three doses of Roundup administered .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ in which the effect changes with dose ) .
Bacteria grown in vitro from the faeces of control animals and treated with increasing concentrations of Roundup showed growth inhibition .
This demonstrated a direct growth inhibitory effect of Roundup , but only at high concentrations that far exceeded the doses that the female rats were exposed to in the in vivo experiment .
One limitation of the study was that faeces from only three animals per test group of 10 from the long-term study were analyzed – a small sample .
A possible @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is a direct effect of Roundup on the gut microbiome .
The authors offer extensive arguments supporting this interpretation .
However , some counter-arguments cast doubt on it – notably , that there were no differences in effect between the different doses .
Building on this fact , it is known from other studies that surfactants such as those present in glyphosate herbicide formulations ( e.g .
Roundup ) have profound effects on the gut microbiome .
Thus increasing doses of Roundup would be expected to result in a more pronounced alteration in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ response ( in which effect increases with dose ) was not seen in this study .
The in vitro experiments show gut bacterial growth inhibition only at high concentrations .
The authors suggest that gut microbiome “ resilience ” ( that is , adaptation to external disruptive agents ) may account for this lack of a dose response to increasing dose of Roundup .
However , there are two points worth taking into account that can provide a more consistent and coherent explantation for the lack of a dose response to Roundup exposure @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this study show gut bacterial growth inhibition only at high concentrations , suggesting that the alterations in the gut microbiome in vivo may be an indirect rather a direct effect of the Roundup .
Second , the authors acknowledge that it is well documented that functional disturbances in organs distant from the gut , especially the liver , are often associated with marked changes in the gut microbiome .
It has been demonstrated that even the lowest dose Roundup treatment group in this study suffered from marked liver structural and functional damage reflective @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) and non-alcoholic steatohepatosis ( NASH ) .
The lowest dose of Roundup produced as profound a liver dysfunction as the highest dose .
In other words , with regard to the liver damage , the researchers did not see a linear dose response .
Similarly , and as we have seen , the alterations in the gut microbiome observed in these same female rats do not follow a linear dose response .
Thus it is quite plausible that they are a result of the liver dysfunction .
This provides the most coherent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the gut microbiome .
Sex-dependent impact of Roundup on the rat gut microbiome In 2016 , we published an article on the dangers of the meningitis B vaccination , Bexsero , titled , Are Ineffective New Meningitis B Vaccines Causing Harm to Children ?
At the time of publication , according to the FDA product information leaflet , the vaccine had in fact only been approved for children over the age of ten .
Despite , this fact however , in the UK , the meningitis B vaccine Bexsero was being administered to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ despite the fact that we could find no evidence to support that this vaccine was safe to be administered to babies .
In our previous article , we stated that : To support our argument , we published the following screenshot from the FDA website : Once again , to prove that this was the information being provided by the FDA , we published the following screenshot : In fact , the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC ) , now provide similar information to the FDA .
In 2016 , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , it has been brought to our attention that there are in fact two product information leaflets on the same vaccination .
However , what is different about the second product information leaflet , published on January 14 , 2015 , by the European Medical Agency ( EMA ) is that the information that it provides , is the polar opposite , of the information provided by the FDA .
Who is Correct Regarding the Safety of this Vaccine for Children : The FDA or The EMA ?
Due to the fact that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conflicting , how are parents supposed to know which agency is providing the correct information ?
For example , in contrast to the FDA , the EMA has confirmed that not only is Bexsero safe and effective , but that it should be given to all babies from the age of eight weeks .
Whereas , the FDA clearly stated that the safety and effectiveness of Bexsero had not been established in children under the age of 10 years , the EMA has stated the complete opposite : Confused by the conflicting information @ @ @ @ @ @ @ News turned to the manufacturer of the vaccine , GlaxoSmithKline , for guidance .
Once again their information published on the GlaxoSmithKline website , July 2017 , mirrored information published by the FDA .
They stated : As you can clearly see , the information that is being provided by GlaxoSmithKline , is exactly the same as the information being provided by the FDA .
This being the case , we must ask : All the information that we have discovered during our investigation has indicated that the meningitis B vaccine Bexsero should @ @ @ @ @ @ @ – 25 years .
Other than the EMA , no agency has provided alternate information .
In a final attempt to find any other alternative view on this we turned to the Joint Committee for Vaccination and Immunization ( JCVI ) .
JCVI Recommend Paracetamol as Bexsero Can Cause an Increased Risk of Fever The JCVI are an organization that advises the UK health departments on immunization .
In 2014 , they published a paper titled , JCVI position statement on use of Bexsero® meningococcal B vaccine in the UK .
Sadly , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ whether or not the vaccine was cost effective , than whether the vaccine was actually safe or not .
However , they did state that : Although , they continued their statement with the following extremely worrying piece of information : And if this statement was not alarming enough , they continued by adding that : In other words , the JCVI recognize the fact that this vaccination has the potential to cause a fever severe enough to warrant medical attention , but it is OK because parents can be educated to give @ @ @ @ @ @ @ which incidentally , according to the National Health Service , can cause liver failure .
Learn more about the dangers of paracetamol ( acetaminophen ) .
Interestingly , it appears that the chairman of the JCVI , which is the British equivalent of the ACIP ( Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices ) , Prof Andrew J Pollard helped in the manufactuting of Bexsero .
This was reported by Age of Autism who wrote : With this information in mind , Health Impact News would like to know what is really behind the UK @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to infants as young as eight weeks of age , and should parents be warned that it has not been approved for children under the age of 10 years old ?
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com .
Read this before you consider purchasing a hazmat suit to protect yourself from Ebola !
Are we facing an Ebola pandemic that will kill millions , or is this just a marketing plan of the pharmaceutical industry to sell more drugs and vaccines ?
Is the current strain of the Ebola virus a secret creation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ researchers , or the fruit of Monsanto ’ s product development team ?
Was Ebola created , or did it just accidentally spill over into humans from an animal host such as African fruit bats ?
Is the US government intentionally not taking strong action to prevent Ebola from spreading or is there really minimal risk to Americans ?
Are there groups that want to decrease the world population through spreading contagious diseases such as Ebola , or is this just another imaginary plan that is being reported by certain conspiracy theory groups @ @ @ @ @ @ @ epidemic , a global pandemic , or a hoax ?
Is life in America as we have known it about to collapse into chaos and martial law , or will we be safe and secure once we take the Ebola vaccine ?
Will more people die from the Ebola vaccine than would have died from the disease itself ?
All these questions have been circulating through the media over the last few months .
The situation with Ebola is certainly a complex muddle of contradictory facts , opposing interpretations , and political intrigue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the 1976 Swine flu hoax — commonly called the swine flu fiasco or the swine flu debacle .
The Relationship between the 1976 Swine Flu Hoax and Ebola Zaire To better interpret what is happening with the current Ebola situation , it will be helpful to look at one of the great American examples of health policy gone awry .
For those who don ’ t remember the 1976 swine flu threat or weren ’ t living in that era of history , it will be useful to compare the past events to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 1976 , I was a junior in college .
A friend convinced me that I should be concerned about the swine flu that was predicted to devastate the US population .
Millions of people were expected to die unless we all lined up and took the flu shot .
Reluctantly I gave in to my friends fear and we went and got the vaccine .
Four years later , when I was a public health graduate student , we were required to read a book about the 1976 swine flu hoax .
I @ @ @ @ @ @ @ I was so naive !
As a 23 year old graduate student , I found it hard to believe that the system failed so badly .
At that time , I truly believed that government officials , physicians , scientists , pharmaceutical companies , and of course public health agencies were all working to promote the health of Americans .
It was disturbing and shocking to learn that faulty scientific interpretations , partisan political interests , opportunities for corporate profit , and personal pride and desire for career advancement were the powerful driving @ @ @ @ @ @ @ swine flu program .
The whole thing began in February 1976 when an Army recruit at Fort Dix , New Jersey , fell ill and died from a swine flu virus thought to be similar to the 1918 strain , which killed an estimated 500,000 Americans .
Based on a relative similarity with the 1918 swine flu , it was determined that millions might soon die unless the US government mobilized a powerful response to protect Americans .
It was time to pull out all the stops and show how the public health @ @ @ @ @ @ @ During the spring and summer of 1976 , pharmaceutical companies went to work making and stockpiling millions of doses of swine flu vaccine .
Then the government went to work inducing sufficient fear among Americans to motivate us to roll up our sleeves and take the shot .
We saw pictures of President Gerald Ford receiving his shot , and many of us did the same patriotic deed in the year of our nation ’ s bicentennial birthday .
Taking the vaccine was in many ways advertised as an act of patriotism as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Well , in retrospect , the swine flu epidemic of 1976 never developed .
It wasn ’ t because 40 million Americans took the shot .
It was because the swine flu never existed .
It was nothing more than poor science , flawed judgments and wishful thinking .
In short we all were part of a grand hoax .
After all the hype , and only one death and 13 cases of the swine flu , [ 1 ] the vaccination program was abruptly cancelled after 10 weeks .
The vaccine program @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , because of severe adverse reactions .
More than 500 people are thought to have developed Guillain-Barre syndrome after receiving the vaccine , and 25 died from the unexpected adverse reaction .
[ 2 , 3 ] Guillain-Barre syndrome is a neurological condition which causes temporary paralysis that can lead to death .
More people died from the flu vaccine than died from the flu .
Could Ebola be another Grand Hoax in the Making ?
At this point I don ’ t think we can be sure the threat is real .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ when we know that thousands have died in Africa from the Ebola virus ?
This is what the World Health Organization ( WHO ) has to say about the deaths from Ebola .
Please take note of the words that I emphasized with bold type .
The report dated October 8 , 2014 states : I highlighted the words “ confirmed , probable , and suspected ” in the preceding paragraph , because the number of affected persons and the number of deaths are not all based on scientific testing .
The truth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a belief about Ebola incidence and fatalities .
People are constantly getting sick and dying in Africa just as they are in the US .
In the current situation , where Ebola is likely on the minds of every doctor and nurse in western Africa , it is natural to attribute deaths to Ebola .
Having been part of the public health system as a young person , it is clear to me that we make assumptions , even though our training cautioned us against such behavior .
Just as generals in the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ next war so that they can go to work doing what they have spent a lifetime studying — leaders of the public health system , such as those in the World Health Organization , are eager to grab at any opportunity to find a disease threat and to eradicate it .
After all , that is their job .
Generals and public health officials both think in terms of the next battle to be fought .
That is what they will do even when the threat is minimal or maybe does not actually @ @ @ @ @ @ @ warfare at the World Health Organization making inferences and assumptions , which might just prove to be wrong ?
I read a series of investigate reports from Jon Rappoport which presented stunning evidence that the standard Ebola tests are anything but accurate .
He quotes from a Department of Defense manual and explains the instructions concerning Ebola diagnosis .
His report states : Do the preceding comments from Jon Rappoport disturb you ?
Maybe there aren ’ t as many true cases of Ebola as are being reported .
The WHO wants us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ control epidemic in Africa , and they are reporting that their numbers are far below the actual cases of Ebola .
We are told that African health officials are so overwhelmed that they can ’ t even count or report all the Ebola cases .
[ 6 ] Jon Rappoport finished his post with this statement : Are other Diseases being Confused with Ebola ?
There might be any number of diseases or health conditions that may have symptoms similar to Ebola virus disease .
Acute pesticide exposure , acute chemical exposure from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ common variety of flu could all be confused with true cases of Ebola .
If health workers are as overwhelmed as has been reported , then confusion is likely .
An example of this confusion is provided by Jon Rappoport in another article .
He states : Is it Coincidence that the “ Epidemic ” and the Vaccine are Arriving Together ?
I must wonder how it is that the Ebola vaccine is almost ready for distribution at the same time that we are being told to brace ourselves , because the Ebola @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a worldwide pandemic that could kill millions of us .
Here are a few facts that you might find of interest concerning this coincidence .
Major grants have been given by the US military to develop Ebola drugs for the treatment of people who might be exposed to Ebola .
In 2006 , Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc. was reported to gain $ 23 million over the next four years from an anti-terror drug development contract from the US Defense Department .
[ 10 ] In 2010 , Tekmira was awarded up to 140 million @ @ @ @ @ @ @ prevent Ebola from being turned into a bioterrorism weapon .
[ 11 ] ( See also : U.S. Military Starts Producing Vaccines : New Billion Dollar Experimental Vaccine Market ?
and The Pentagon ’ s Vaccine Factories . )
Monsanto has now partnered with the Department of Defense to use a proxy third party company ( Tekmira Pharmaceuticals Corporation ) to develop a vaccine against Ebola .
The seed money began at $ 1.5 million .
The value of the deal could grow to an estimated $ 86 million dollars .
[ 12 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Center at Vanderbilt University also received a $ 4.4 million grant from the US Department of Defense for Ebola vaccine development and other Ebola treatments .
[ 13 ] I wish I could definitively tell you whether Ebola is a real threat or a hoax .
Based on what I know about the corruption in the pharmaceutical industry , conflicts of interest among political leaders , corporate influence over government agencies , and the agenda of the World Health Organization , I have to say that the truth is buried among a mountain @ @ @ @ @ @ @ changing assumptions .
Should we be concerned about Ebola ?
Should we be afraid ?
Should we do whatever we are told by the Centers for Disease Control ( CDC ) , which just happens to hold the patent on this strain of the Ebola virus and all future strains of Ebola ?
[ 14 ] Even if Ebola is truly a threat , I don ’ t recommend spending a lot of time worrying about it .
I , however , do recommend taking several positive actions .
My recommendations fall into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ concerned about any form of viral or bacterial infection needs to fortify his or her immune system .
( See recommendations below . )
The second suggestion involves doing everything you can to avoid taking the Ebola vaccine when it is made available .
A strong immune system is the best defense against Ebola .
The vaccine will not be a true prevention , and is likely to be filled with toxic substances that will compromise your immune system .
If I am wrong , and the Ebola virus becomes a real threat @ @ @ @ @ @ @ your immune system will substantially lower your risk of being infected by the Ebola virus .
If I am right and there really is little to worry about , then the recommendations will simply give you a stronger immune system , which is a good position to be in regardless of any known or unknown viral threats .
The bottom line is that we do not need to resign control over our health to a government agency or to a pharmaceutical company .
We do not need to become helpless victims of an @ @ @ @ @ @ @ We have strong options to lower the risk of contracting this disease and surviving it if we are infected .
We have options and we do not need to live in terror of a viral menace !
Does the Conventional Medical System Have a Cure for Ebola ?
Scientists from the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio , Texas , indicate that the conventional medical system does not have a curative treatment for Ebola .
Even treatments that are being developed by pharmaceutical companies are described as palliative .
Palliative @ @ @ @ @ @ @ pharmaceutical drugs for treating cases of Ebola will not be a cure , but will offer partial treatment to those who contract Ebola .
Pharmaceutical companies are also working on Ebola vaccines .
They hope to begin selling an Ebola vaccine in 2015 .
[ 15 ] At this point , in October of 2014 , we do not have any scientific research which can prove that any specific treatment is effective for curing people who become infected with the currently active strain of Ebola .
[ 16 ] At first glance , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ into a panic about the situation .
The good news is that alternative healthcare practitioners have numerous treatments that might be helpful against the Ebola virus .
Of course , the herbs , vitamins , and essential oils that could be potentially beneficial , have not been proven as being effective against Ebola .
Thus , the pharmaceutical companies and alternative healthcare practitioners are in the same boat .
Neither group can claim that they have the cure for Ebola .
At this point , all treatments are experimental .
[ 17 ] @ @ @ @ @ @ @ identify the best treatments until people who actually have the disease are treated for it by conventional and alternative healthcare providers .
It ’ s Your Immune System that will Cure Ebola Ultimately , people who contract the disease and survive will need to depend on a strong immune system for survival .
The vaccine will not cure a person who already has Ebola .
Pharmaceuticals and natural substances will help .
But protection from Ebola , if it becomes a real threat , depends on our natural ability to resist viral diseases @ @ @ @ @ @ @ care such as proper nutrition and hydration .
USA Today reports Dr. Anthony Faucithe ’ s analysis of the Ebola situation .
He is the longtime director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases .
Dr. Faucithe states : A strong immune system is the best defense for fighting Ebola or any other viral infection .
Building a strong immune system involves many factors .
It begins with turning away from the standard American high sugar , high carbohydrate , low fat , and highly processed diet .
This diet @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have been weakened by chronic poor nutrition from a standard American style diet , and who are exposed to environmental chemicals , numerous food additives such as preservatives , pesticides and highly processed food ingredients will have a much more difficult time fighting Ebola if they happen to contact the virus .
Fighting Ebola Does not Need to be Complicated We have been led to believe that our only hope is in the magic formulas and expensive potions of the pharmaceutical industry , but this is quite far from the truth .
There @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and cure viral infections .
I will discuss a few of the options in the following sections .
Ultraviolet radiation from the sun can be important for Ebola prevention and treatment .
The Ebola virus is inactivated when it is exposed to UV radiation .
[ 19 ] UV light is contained in unfiltered natural sunlight and is available from manmade sources .
The Ebola virus can survive in liquid or dried material for a number of days once it leaves the body of the host .
[ 20 ] This means that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the virus .
Health Engineers have actually developed a UV robot that can be sent into an area that might contain viruses and/or bacteria and completely disinfect the environment in 2 minutes .
This means that high risk environments for Ebola transmission could be easily treated every day if needed .
[ 21 ] Vitamin D is produced in the human body when our skin is exposed to direct sun light .
Longtime proponent of vitamin D therapy , Dr. Joseph Mercola , reminds us that vitamin D is essential for healthy @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Vitamin D supplementation is usually needed by people who live in northern climates and are not able to obtain adequate sun exposure .
Vitamin C destroys viruses or sets them up for destruction by the immune system .
Oral doses of high quality vitamin C will prevent viral infections , and intravenous ( IV ) vitamin C therapy can be used as a powerful cure for active cases of Ebola and other viral infections .
In an article about treating Ebola infection , Dr. Thomas E. Levy , MD , JD recently stated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ treatments for viral infections have been quite effective .
Dr. Eileen Nauman sites some of the homeopathic remedies that can be useful for treating Ebola .
The excerpt from her book states : Please note : it is not a good idea to try and make your own homeopathic remedy from live Ebola virus .
If you wish to use homeopathic treatments , then please consult a qualified homeopathic practitioner .
The Alliance for Natural Health provides information about Ebola and silver .
They state : A substance manufactured in the human body @ @ @ @ @ @ @ useful against Ebola virus .
The substance is called mannose-binding lectin .
It has a powerful ability to breakdown difficult to destroy viruses such as Ebola .
People who have low levels of mannose-binding lectins will have more difficulty destroying the Ebola virus if it enters their bodies .
[ 26 ] The most promising form of mannose-binding lectin is a component of the Scytonema varium red algae called Scytovirin .
Another anti-viral extract was found from the New Zealand red alga species , Griffithsia sp .
This protein is called Griffithsin .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ explains that red algae can be taken as a supplement against Ebola .
He states : Researchers who specialize in the study of melatonin have published a report showing that melatonin could be a valuable treatment for treating Ebola infections .
Melatonin is most commonly thought of as a hormone that is essential to normal sleep , but it is also a pervasive and powerful antioxidant that protects DNA .
The report indicates that melatonin can be used to address severe symptoms of Ebola infection .
These include endothelial disruption , disseminated intravascular @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the small blood vessels throughout the body ) , and multiple organ hemorrhage , which commonly occur with an Ebola infection .
They indicated that there are numerous similarities between Ebola virus infection and septic shock .
Melatonin has been successfully employed for the treatment of sepsis in many experimental and clinical studies .
It could be useful for Ebola as well .
They are encouraging the use of melatonin for Ebola treatment , because there are a limited number of Ebola treatments and a very limited inventory of pharmaceutical drugs for Ebola @ @ @ @ @ @ @ use of melatonin , because it has a high safety profile , is readily available and can be orally self-administered .
Thus , the use of melatonin would be compatible with situations where there is a large scale outbreak of this infection .
[ 29 ] There are many essential oils that are known to kill viruses .
Some of these oils were recognized as effective in previous historical plagues , before they were known as “ essential oils , ” which is a more modern term .
The French perfumers in particular @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be effective against many of the historical plagues of the past .
Unfortunately , much of the online knowledge about which essential oils might be effective against Ebola were contained on websites selling these essential oils .
Recently , the FDA decided to attack the two largest distributors of essential oils , and force them to remove this information .
( See : FDA Targets Essentials Oils : Sees EOs as Threat to New Ebola Drugs ? )
.
The best place to find this information today is probably via books on the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to search the Internet in other languages , you might want to try searching in Mandarin Chinese , as the Chinese have a strong herbal and essential oil history .
Pure plant oils are a direct threat to pharmaceutical products , and it appears that the government has used the “ Ebola crisis ” to finally go after distributors of these essential oils and force them to remove all health claims from the Internet .
For an overview on the health benefits of essential oils see my previous article : Using Essential Oils @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be offering all of my articles on this topic together in an eBook format .
Dr. Brownstein is a well-known alternative healthcare physician who has done extensive research to help his patients use natural substances to prevent and overcome illnesses .
His most recent recommendations , published last week , will help you build up your immune system and respond to the Ebola virus if you encounter it .
His recommendations include dosages , which could help you and your healthcare provider use safe alternatives if you need treatment for Ebola virus infection @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Fear May be More Toxic than Ebola I think there is a high possibility the mainstream media will soon be reporting that the people of the United States are in very serious danger from Ebola , and we must take precautions .
We may be told that millions will likely die unless every last American takes the Ebola vaccine .
We may be under strong pressure from government leaders , business leaders , religious leaders , and civil authorities to take the vaccine .
According to public health data , it appears that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ who are infected with Ebola will die even with conventional medical help .
As stated earlier , we can not be sure that the number of deaths that are attributed to Ebola is accurate , thus , the death rate from Ebola could be lower than is claimed .
There are quite a few natural approaches to Ebola prevention and treatment .
We do not have to hide in our homes in fear or put on a hazmat suit to go out into public .
It is advised that we clean up our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and send away the fear demons who want us to fall into a hopeless state of despair , so that we will do whatever we are told .
Regardless of whether the threat from Ebola materializes in the US , we do not have to become helpless victims .
We do not need to fall prey to fear .
This is important , because people are increasingly becoming more and more fearful as news reports fan the flames of an approaching epidemic .
When people do not understand a disease such as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
If people feel there might not be any help for them and their families if they get the disease , the natural reaction is fear .
Sustained fear suppresses the immune system .
[ 31 ] Unrelenting fear can actually contribute to the likelihood of developing Ebola disease if the virus is contacted .
In this sense , fear can help spread the disease in a community by lowering the functioning of our immune systems .
A discussion of Ebola or any other threat of epidemic disease would not be complete without @ @ @ @ @ @ @ power of prayer .
Those who have a relationship with God will be empowered to enter into His peace and to live under His protection .
Those who lack such a relationship may find themselves doing battle with fear , and its friends panic and terror .
If we expect to see Ebola spread through America and we fear for our lives and the lives of our families , then we are putting ourselves under stress .
Fear is a tricky fellow .
It doesn ’ t work to tell yourself , “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ does work is to prayerfully live in relationship with God who can relieve us of our fear and allow us to live day by day under His care .
Those who live in the way of His peace know where they are headed and will be able to trust in Him regardless of what happens .
John P. Thomas is a health writer for Health Impact News .
He holds a B.A .
in Psychology from the University of Michigan , and a Master of Science in Public Health ( M.S.P.H . )
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ Department of Health Administration , at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill .
[ 3 ] “ Reflections on the 1976 Swine Flu Vaccination Program , ” David J. Sencer and J. Donald Millar , Emerging Infectious Disease journal – CDC , Volume 12 , Number 1—January 2006 , Retrieved 10/10/14 .
http : //wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/12/1/05-1007_article [ 12 ] “ The Monsanto Sponsored Ebola Vaccine Will Kill More People Than the Ebola Itself , ” Dave Hodges , The Common Sense Show , August 4 , 2014 , Retrieved 10/10/14 .
http @ @ @ @ @ @ @ may send personnel to Africa to help fight Ebola epidemic , ” Navy Times , navytimes.com , August 1 , 2014 , Retrieved 10/14/14 .
http : //www.navytimes.com/article/20140801/NEWS08/308010074/DoD-may-send-personnel-Africa-help-fight-Ebola-epidemic [ 14 ] “ The CDC , NIH & Bill Gates Own the Patents On Existing Ebola & Related Vaccines : Mandatory Vaccinations Are Near , ” Dave Hodges , The Common Sense Show , September 17 , 2014 , Retrieved 10/10/14 .
http : //www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2014/09/17/the-cdc-nih-bill-gates-own-the-patents-on-existing-ebola-related-vaccines-mandatory-vaccinations-are-near/ [ 15 ] Tan DX1 , Reiter RJ , Manchester LC .
; “ Ebola virus disease : Potential @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” J Pineal Res .
2014 Sep 27 , PMID : 25262626 .
[ 17 ] “ Episode 6 : Antiviral herbal medicines vs. Ebola and other viral pandemics , ” Mike Adams , Health Ranger , – BioDefense.com , Reference to a video teaching session , Retrieved 10/9/14 .
http : //biodefense.com/Pandemic-Preparedness-Episode-06.html [ 18 ] “ Fauci : New drugs not the best answer for Ebola , ” Karen Weintraub , USA Today , August 6 , 2014 , Retrieved 10/14/14 .
http : //www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/08/06/fauci-ebola-drugs/13672605/ [ 21 ] “ Ultraviolet light robot @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doesn ’ t every hospital have one of these ?
” Mike Adams , NaturalNews.com , 10/11/14 , 2014 , Retrieved 10/14/14 .
http : //www.naturalnews.com/047216_Ebola_contamination_Xenex_ultraviolet_light.html [ 22 ] “ Should You Worry About an Ebola Outbreak in the US ?
” Mercola.com , August 19 , 2014 , Retrieved 10/14/14 .
http : //articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2014/08/19/ebola-outbreak.aspx [ 23 ] “ Ebola virus can be destroyed naturally without side effects , ” Thomas E. Levy , MD , JD , Natural Health 365 , August 3 , 2014 , Retrieved 10/14/14 .
http : //www.naturalhealth365.com/natural_cures/ebola-virus-thomas-levy-1095.html @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Turns To Experimental Drugs , But Not Proven Natural Remedies , ” Alliance for Natural Health , September 2 , 2014 , Retrieved 10/14/14 .
http : //www.anh-usa.org/ebola-who-turns-to-experimental-drugs-but-not-proven-natural-remedies/ [ 29 ] Tan DX1 , Reiter RJ , Manchester LC .
; “ Ebola virus disease : Potential use of melatonin as a treatment , ” J Pineal Res .
2014 Sep 27 , PMID : 25262626 .
[ 30 ] “ What Can You Do to Prevent/Treat Ebola and Other Viral Infections , ” Dr. Brownstein , October 10 , 2014 , Retrieved @ @ @ @ @

Once again, COVID-19 reveals child welfare’s double standards
Are you a parent who just can’t handle the demands of your own work, the stress of coronavirus and educating your child from home while schools are closed?
If you’re middle-class you can get indulgence, sympathy and helpful hints. Your kids can “play Fortnite for the next eight hours.”
If you’re poor you can get a caseworker at the door investigating you for “educational neglect.”
by Richard Wexler
National Coalition for Child Protection Reform
Excerpts:
All over America, parents are finding out just how hard it is to be a teacher – particularly when it’s your own child and everyone has to master new technology and new lessons at the same time.
The New York Times feels your pain. In a story filled with examples of middle-class parents struggling to cope – or even giving up – the story declares:
With teachers relegated to computer screens, parents have to play teacher’s aide, hall monitor, counselor and cafeteria worker — all while trying to do their own jobs under extraordinary circumstances. … Kindergartners need help logging into Zoom. Seventh-graders need help with algebra, last used by dad circa 1992. “School” often ends by lunchtime, leaving parents from Long Island to Dallas to Los Angeles asking themselves the same question: How bad am I if my child plays Fortnite for the next eight hours?
If you’re middle class, not bad at all. In fact, you can give up entirely! Again, from the story:
The litmus tweet of the moment came from Sarah Parcak, an archaeologist at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. “I told our son’s (lovely, kind, caring) teacher that, no, we will not be participating in her ‘virtual classroom,’ and that he was done with the 1st grade,” she wrote on Twitter in early April. “We cannot cope with this insanity. Survival and protecting his well being come first.”
Yes, that’s right – if you’re white and middle class you can announce to the whole world that your child is “done with first grade” and not have to worry. It’s similar to how middle-class moms can brag about using marijuana.
To the surprise of, I’m guessing, pretty much no one, whether its pot or education, it doesn’t work that way if you’re poor.
If you’re poor, it’s “educational neglect”
Shortly after New York City schools closed, I started hearing rumors that schools were actually calling in “educational neglect” reports on parents when their kids didn’t “show up for class” online – because, after all, every child living in poverty has immediate access to all the necessary technology, right?
And what could be better for kids and families in this time of stress than a caseworker from the city’s Administration for Children’s Services caseworker showing up at the door?
Thanks to some good reporting from Eileen Grench at the online news site The City, now we know: The rumors were true. From Grench’s story:
Joyce McMillan, family advocate at Sinergia and founder of the Parent Legislative Action Network, says mothers she works with in homeless shelters have been threatened by children’s school staff with a call to the child neglect hotline — even as they struggled to get diapers, much less share internet limited shelter hotspots. “If we know this is the population of people that we’re working with,” asked McMillan, “why are you using informants if you know [families] can’t comply?”
The city’s Department of Education (DOE) says teachers and others are supposed to check first to see if the problem is lack of technology. But teachers are mandated reporters – subject to severe penalties if they don’t report. So it’s easier – for them – to just call in the report.
All this is on top of the fact that there is abundant evidence that “educational neglect” is so useless when it comes to finding actual child abuse, so harmful to children, families and to education, and so easily abused, that it probably should not even be something that can be reported to child protective services at all.
Read the full article at the National Coalition for Child Protection Reform.
Comment on this article at MedicalKidnap.com.
Medical Kidnapping: A Threat to Every Family in America T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton!
Order here!
Medical Kidnapping is REAL!
See: Medical Kidnapping: A Threat to Every Family in America Today
Help spread the awareness of Medical Kidnapping by wearing the Medical Kidnapping t-shirt!
Support the cause of MedicalKidnap.com, which is part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!
Support the cause against Medical Kidnapping by purchasing our new book!
If you know people who are skeptical and cannot believe that medical kidnapping happens in the U.S. today, this is the book for them! Backed with solid references and real life examples, they will not be able to deny the plain evidence before them, and will become better educated on this topic that is destroying the American family.
1 Book – 228 pages
Retail: $24.99
FREE Shipping Available!
Now: $14.99
Order here!
2 Books
Retail: $49.98 (for 2 books)
FREE Shipping Available!
Now: $19.99 (for 2 books)
Order here!


healthimpactnews--2020-05-07--How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

Back in January of this year ( 2020 ) we reported about Event 201 , a pandemic simulation which was hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation .
This event took place about 6 weeks BEFORE the first cases of COVID-19 were reported in Wuhan China .
See : Did Bill Gates & World Economic Forum Predict Coronavirus Outbreak ?
Will There be an Internet Blackout to Control Information ?
As I have previously written , almost everything that was predicted at this pandemic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ one : an Internet blackout .
The most likely reason that an Internet blackout has not occurred yet , is because the American public , and indeed the world population , was very compliant and voluntarily locked themselves down in their own homes – something that has never before happened .
With a compliant public , an Internet blackout would have done more harm than good , as the bandwidth on the Internet was pushed to its limits with everyone suddenly working from home via the Internet , and entertainment streaming services seeing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ complied and stayed home .
Shutting off the Internet would have been counterproductive , as it would have made people angry and quite possibly led them out their homes back on to the streets to start protesting sooner .
As a result , more and more people were able to research what was really going on , and find alternative accounts of the news different from what was being spoon fed to them through the corporate media and television networks .
This has increased the corporate news organizations and their Big Tech alliances @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , and Google to increase their efforts to censor dissenting voices , such as what we publish here at Health Impact News .
A group funded by the Corporate Media giants called “ Newsguard ” is at the forefront in determining what websites are publishing information contrary to what they want the public to hear , and they have published a list here ( Health Impact News is on the list , of course ) : I have previously exposed this group called “ Newsguard ” by publishing my own correspondence with them @ @ @ @ @ @ @ many of our articles are now censored and not allowed on Facebook , Twitter , Google ( who owns YouTube ) and Pinterest ( Pinterest has banned us completely ) .
In addition , emails from the domains of our news sites , like healthimpactnews.com , are also being suppressed , and many of the larger Big Tech “ free ” emails like hotmail.com and yahoo.com no longer allow us to email our newsletters or respond to inquiries .
So how do you beat this Internet censorship ?
First , stop using their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Gmail .
Everything you communicate via Gmail is owned by Google , and they index all your emails on their servers .
Two free email services that value privacy are located outside of the U.S. but available to people residing within the U.S. , and they are Protonmail ( Switzerland ) , and Tutanota ( Germany ) .
So unless you have your own private email service on your own email server , it is best to use a service like this so you can continue receiving emails and newsletters such as what @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , there is a way to bypass email completely , and be able to instantaneously get all the news you want from all of your favorite websites and bypass censorship efforts by using an older technology that still exists today : RSS feeds .
RSS stands for Really Simple Syndication ( or sometimes Rich Site Summary . )
It was developed back in the 1990s during the infancy of the Internet , and was originally called RDF ( Resource Description Framework ) .
Almost all websites publishing content still use this technology today @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is included with each new article published , that can then be retrieved by an RSS feed reader as soon as that content is published , which bypasses third parties such as email and social media postings .
All of the Health Impact News websites have an RSS icon that one can click on to get the XML file URL that one can then add to any standard RSS feed reader .
In addition , one can just type : /feed/ at the end of the URL for any of our websites and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ file .
So it would look like this : https : //healthimpactnews.com/feed/ This should work for most websites that have an XML file .
For those that sites that do not have an RSS icon , or do not provide a an XML feed by simply appending /feed/ to the end of the homepage URL , you can usually right click with your mouse and choose to look at the page “ source ” , and then search ( usually CTR “ F ” in most browsers ) for “ RSS ” to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to collect the XML file that you can then add to your RSS Feed Reader .
There are many RSS Feed Readers to choose from , including apps for Apple and Android .
Most of them will operate basically the same , so just search for the more popular ones .
As Editor of Health Impact News , my entire news feed these days is in my RSS Feed Reader .
I use the desktop version of Mozilla ’ s Thunderbird ( free ) , which is mainly known as an email client @ @ @ @ @ @ @ RSS feeds that can be quickly used to look at new articles from as many sources as you want to add .
And it doesn ’ t have to just be sites you like .
You can include corporate news sites also , if you want to stay on top of what they are publishing as well .
Here is how my news feed in Thunderbird looks : My list of news feeds lets me know if there are new articles I have not yet checked , and how many I have not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ website ’ s RSS feed URL , it is easy to add it to your own custom news feed in basically a 4-step process : Once your news feed is collecting your own custom list of articles for a while , you can also now take advantage of your own custom search engine by searching your news feed !
This is increasingly more important these days as Google owns Internet searches , and even if you use a more private search engine that does not track your searches ( recommended ) such as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ data compiled by Google , and Google now filters their search results so that only the relevant results they believe you should have access to shows up in their searches .
To understand this censorship Google is dominating in , read what they did to one of the oldest Alternative Health websites on the Internet , Mercola.com : Google and Wikipedia Team Together To Suppress Alternative Health Information By using an RSS Feed Reader , YOU have the freedom to beat censorship by grabbing new articles as they are published without first going @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can be censored , and you get to develop your own collection of data over time that can be searched .
Which websites should you add to your news feed ?
That is entirely up to you , but the list we linked to above from Newsguard that lists websites they claim are publishing “ misinformation ” about the coronavirus that they are so desperately trying to censor , might be a good place to start !
Knowledge is powerful , and ignorance is dangerous , especially in these dark days where those @ @ @ @ @ @ @ take away your freedoms and keep you in the dark , so that they can better control you .

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Back in January of this year (2020) we reported about Event 201, a pandemic simulation which was hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
This event took place about 6 weeks BEFORE the first cases of COVID-19 were reported in Wuhan China. See:
As I have previously written, almost everything that was predicted at this pandemic simulation event has now occurred, except one: an Internet blackout.
The most likely reason that an Internet blackout has not occurred yet, is because the American public, and indeed the world population, was very compliant and voluntarily locked themselves down in their own homes – something that has never before happened.
With a compliant public, an Internet blackout would have done more harm than good, as the bandwidth on the Internet was pushed to its limits with everyone suddenly working from home via the Internet, and entertainment streaming services seeing a record high demand as people voluntarily complied and stayed home.
Shutting off the Internet would have been counterproductive, as it would have made people angry and quite possibly led them out their homes back on to the streets to start protesting sooner.
As a result, more and more people were able to research what was really going on, and find alternative accounts of the news different from what was being spoon fed to them through the corporate media and television networks.
This has increased the corporate news organizations and their Big Tech alliances with companies such as Facebook, Twitter, and Google to increase their efforts to censor dissenting voices, such as what we publish here at Health Impact News.
A group funded by the Corporate Media giants called “Newsguard” is at the forefront in determining what websites are publishing information contrary to what they want the public to hear, and they have published a list here (Health Impact News is on the list, of course):
I have previously exposed this group called “Newsguard” by publishing my own correspondence with them. See:
As a result, many of our articles are now censored and not allowed on Facebook, Twitter, Google (who owns YouTube) and Pinterest (Pinterest has banned us completely). In addition, emails from the domains of our news sites, like healthimpactnews.com, are also being suppressed, and many of the larger Big Tech “free” emails like hotmail.com and yahoo.com no longer allow us to email our newsletters or respond to inquiries.
So how do you beat this Internet censorship?
First, stop using their free email services, including the popular Gmail. Everything you communicate via Gmail is owned by Google, and they index all your emails on their servers. It seems they are now marking our newsletters as “SPAM” and not delivering them into inboxes.
Two free email services that value privacy are located outside of the U.S. but available to people residing within the U.S., and they are Protonmail (Switzerland), and Tutanota (Germany). So unless you have your own private email service on your own email server, it is best to use a service like this so you can continue receiving emails and newsletters such as what we publish here at HealthImpactNews.com.
However, there is a way to bypass email completely, and be able to instantaneously get all the news you want from all of your favorite websites and bypass censorship efforts by using an older technology that still exists today: RSS feeds.
RSS stands for Really Simple Syndication (or sometimes Rich Site Summary.) It was developed back in the 1990s during the infancy of the Internet, and was originally called RDF (Resource Description Framework).
Almost all websites publishing content still use this technology today by using an XML file format that is included with each new article published, that can then be retrieved by an RSS feed reader as soon as that content is published, which bypasses third parties such as email and social media postings.
All of the Health Impact News websites have an RSS icon that one can click on to get the XML file URL that one can then add to any standard RSS feed reader. In addition, one can just type: /feed/ at the end of the URL for any of our websites and get the same link to our XML file.
So it would look like this: https://healthimpactnews.com/feed/
This should work for most websites that have an XML file. For those sites that do not have an RSS icon, or do not provide a an XML feed by simply appending /feed/ to the end of the homepage URL, you can usually right click with your mouse and choose to look at the page “source”, and then search (usually CTR “F” in most browsers) for “RSS” to find the link you need to use to collect the XML file that you can then add to your RSS Feed Reader.
There are many RSS Feed Readers to choose from, including apps for Apple and Android. Most of them will operate basically the same, so just search for the more popular ones.
As Editor of Health Impact News, my entire news feed these days is in my RSS Feed Reader. I use the desktop version of Mozilla’s Thunderbird (free), which is mainly known as an email client, but has powerful features for listing RSS feeds that can be quickly used to look at new articles from as many sources as you want to add.
And it doesn’t have to just be sites you like. You can include corporate news sites also, if you want to stay on top of what they are publishing as well. Here is how my news feed in Thunderbird looks:
My list of news feeds lets me know if there are new articles I have not yet checked, and how many I have not yet read.
Once you locate a website’s RSS feed URL, it is easy to add it to your own custom news feed in basically a 4-step process:
Once your news feed is collecting your own custom list of articles for a while, you can also now take advantage of your own custom search engine by searching your news feed!
This is increasingly more important these days as Google owns Internet searches, and even if you use a more private search engine that does not track your searches (recommended) such as duckduckgo.com, these sites are still using data compiled by Google, and Google now filters their search results so that only the relevant results they believe you should have access to shows up in their searches.
To understand this censorship Google is dominating in, read what they did to one of the oldest Alternative Health websites on the Internet, Mercola.com:
By using an RSS Feed Reader, YOU have the freedom to beat censorship by grabbing new articles as they are published without first going through Social Media or email where they can be censored, and you get to develop your own collection of data over time that can be searched.
Which websites should you add to your news feed? That is entirely up to you, but the list we linked to above from Newsguard that lists websites they claim are publishing “misinformation” about the coronavirus that they are so desperately trying to censor, might be a good place to start!
Knowledge is powerful, and ignorance is dangerous, especially in these dark days where those in power calling the shots want to take away your freedoms and keep you in the dark, so that they can better control you.
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-05-08--COVID-19: Rolling Out a “New Era” of High-Risk, Genetically Engineered Vaccines

COVID-19 : The Spearpoint for Rolling Out a “ New Era ” of High-Risk , Genetically Engineered Vaccines [ Note : This article represents Part I of a two-part series examining COVID-19 vaccine technologies and their implications . ]
For weeks , talking heads have been promoting the liability-free vaccine ( s ) that will save the world—so Bill Gates and Tony Fauci proclaim—from what Gates has now dubbed “ Pandemic I.
” As Microsoft News peddles self-congratulatory stories about the Gates Foundation ’ s reorientation of its priorities to devote “ ‘ total attention ’ to the pandemic , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that a vaccine will make its debut in January 2021 .
Not to be outdone , the White House has now unveiled “ Operation Warp Speed ” —a joint pharmaceutical-government-military effort aimed at “ substantially shrinking the development time for a vaccine ” —and President Trump promises one by the end of the year .
Planet-wide COVID-19 vaccination—the overt objective that has all of these players salivating in anticipation—ignores a number of irrefutable obstacles .
For one , the RNA virus being targeted , SARS-CoV-2 , already “ has mutated into at least @ @ @ @ @ @ @ include 19 never seen before as well as “ rare changes that scientists had never imagined could happen.
” Knowledge about these mutations may prove useful to clinicians wanting to better tailor their COVID-19 treatments , but the proliferation of mutations makes the chances of developing an effective vaccine immensely more uncertain .
Not to worry , say the entities funded by Gates ( and also the Pentagon ) .
Scientists working in the burgeoning field of synthetic biology are confident that they can “ outdo ” and outsmart nature using next-generation vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ nanoparticles—along with invasive new vaccine delivery and record-keeping mechanisms such as smartphone-readable quantum dot tattoos .
Does it matter that the researchers who have been experimenting with these approaches have never been able to overcome “ nasty side effects ” ?
Apparently not .
Aided and abetted by the generous Gates and military funding , high-fanfare COVID-19 vaccine planning is proceeding apace .
From a manufacturing standpoint , vaccine makers—and particularly those making viral vaccines—have long chafed at the limitations of traditional vaccine technologies , which rely on processes that necessarily entail “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and vaccine delivery.
” Researchers reiterated this point again in 2018 , writing in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery that : In the 1980s , manufacturers were elated when scientists developed new genetic engineering techniques ( recombinant DNA technology ) that—through the use of “ expression systems ” ( bacteria , yeast , insect cells , mammalian cells or plants such as tobacco ) —made it possible to jumpstart vaccine production and produce so-called “ subunit vaccines.
” The hepatitis B vaccine was the first to employ this “ entirely new ” vaccine production @ @ @ @ @ @ @ COVID-19 vaccines currently in the works are deploying these techniques .
However , a complicating factor of subunit vaccines is that they must be bundled with “ immunopotentiating ” adjuvants that tend to trigger an imbalanced immune response .
Desirous of streamlining vaccine technology still further and enabling vaccine stockpiles in an even shorter time frame , researchers began tinkering in the mid-1990s with nucleic acid vaccines , which include DNA vaccines and messenger RNA ( mRNA ) vaccines .
As a form of gene therapy , both represent a significant departure from @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a vaccine antigen to produce an immune response , nucleic acid vaccines instead send the body instructions to produce the antigen itself .
As one researcher explains , the nucleic acids “ cause the cells to make pieces of the virus , ” with the goal being that the immune system then “ mounts a response to those pieces of the virus.
” Researchers quickly learned that both the DNA and mRNA vaccine options have serious downsides , and as a result , vaccines of this type have never been licensed .
Nonetheless @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the vaccines listed by the World Health Organization as COVID-19 “ candidate vaccines ” as of April 23—including two of the leading contenders—are DNA ( Inovio ) or mRNA ( Moderna ) vaccines ( see table ) .
DNA vaccines are intended to penetrate all the way into a cell ’ s nucleus .
According to one biotech scientist , Not surprisingly , then , when some DNA vaccines made it into clinical trials in the late 2000s , they were plagued by “ suboptimal potency.
” Scientists then came up with the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine delivery with “ electroporation ” —electric shocks applied to the vaccine site ( using a “ smart device ” ) to make cell membranes more permeable and force the DNA into the cells .
The improvements in vaccine efficacy were significant enough that electroporation remains a key design feature of some COVID-19 vaccine candidates today , including the Moderna vaccine that is now speeding toward Phase 2 clinical trials .
A second aspect of DNA vaccines—their gene-altering properties—is even more troubling and remains unresolved .
DNA vaccines , by definition , come @ @ @ @ @ @ @ exogenous DNA into the host genome , which may cause severe mutagenesis and induced new diseases.
” The permanent incorporation of synthetic genes into the recipient ’ s DNA essentially produces a genetically modified human being , with unknown long-term effects .
Speaking of DNA gene therapy , one researcher has stated , “ Genetic integrations using viral gene therapies .
.
.
can have a devastating effect if the integration was placed in the wrong spot in [ the ] genome.
” Because mRNA vaccines are “ particularly suited to speedy development @ @ @ @ @ @ @ they are attracting attention as the “ coronavirus frontrunners.
” mRNA vaccines can reportedly generate savings of “ months or years to standardize and ramp up .
.
.
mass production.
” Making lemonade out of lemons , insiders casually state that : Companies are enamored of the mRNA approach despite observations that the large mRNA molecules are “ intrinsically unstable , ” “ prone to degradation ” and may overactivate the immune system .
On the plus side , from vaccine scientists ’ standpoint , mRNA vaccines need only reach the cell @ @ @ @ @ @ @ simpler technical challenge ” —although the approach still demands “ delivery technologies that can ensure stabilization of mRNA under physiological conditions.
” Formulations such as Moderna ’ s mRNA-1273 vaccine tackle these challenges by using “ chemical modifications to stabilize the mRNA ” and liquid nanoparticles to “ package it into an injectable form.
” mRNA approaches seem to attract researchers with a highly mechanistic view of human beings .
One such individual praises mRNA for its “ inherent ‘ programmability , ” stating : The CEO of Moderna describes mRNA approaches—which use @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ turn the body ’ s cells into ad hoc drug factories ” —as being “ like software : You can just turn the crank and get a lot of products going into development.
” Likewise , the journal Nature ( commenting on mRNA technology from “ a biotech and industrial perspective ” ) enthuses that the approach “ allows rapid refinement with almost limitless combinations of derivatives.
” Vaccine researchers familiar with both DNA and mRNA vaccines like to play up mRNA vaccine safety , citing the fact that the vaccines do @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
However , with years of mRNA vaccine experimentation behind them , none of these researchers has yet achieved licensure .
One answer may be that in preclinical studies , mRNA vaccines have displayed an “ intrinsic ” inflammatory component that makes it difficult to establish an “ acceptable risk/benefit profile.
” mRNA enthusiasts admit that there is , as yet , an inadequate understanding of the inflammation and autoimmune reactions that may result .
This raises many questions about what will happen if regulators grant the manufacturers of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ get mRNA vaccines to people sooner.
” The hijacking of nearly all economic , social , artistic and religious activity by SARS-CoV-2 is disturbing on many levels , not least because of what it reveals about the public ’ s uncritical acceptance of official spin and its yearning for medical silver bullets .
As a vaccine researcher at Sweden ’ s Karolinska Institute has stated : The rush to develop gene-tampering COVID-19 vaccines is also accelerating the conjoined-twins fusion of pharma and biotech .
The lucrative biopharma sector is now the fastest-growing segment @ @ @ @ @ @ @ representing 20 % of the worldwide market and displaying an annual growth rate that is more than double that of conventional pharma .
And COVID-19 vaccines are helping rescue some biopharma companies ’ shaky bottom lines .
In 2017 , for example , Moderna was struggling to “ keep afloat its brash promise to reinvent medicine ” after an experimental therapy that it was counting on proved too unsafe to test in humans .
Fast forward to 2020 , when “ bad news about the coronavirus is good news for Moderna stock.
” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are likewise poised to make record profits from COVID-19 .
As biopharma pursues its unfettered , medical-ethics-be-damned race toward a COVID-19 pot of gold , the public needs to take a critical look at the industry ’ s disincentives for safety and also take a firm stand against the horrifying prospect of coronavirus vaccine mandates .
Otherwise , genetically engineered COVID-19 vaccines are likely to start permanently altering genes , triggering autoimmunity and serving as the catalyst for other vaccine injuries or deaths , and—unhampered by any legal liability—none of the commercial or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com .
This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children ’ s Health Defense , Inc. Want to learn more from Children ’ s Health Defense ?
Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy , Jr. and the Children ’ s Health Defense .
Your donation will help to support them in their efforts .
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist ( kidney doctor ) , Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people .
In this @ @ @ @ @ @ @ constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real , ethical medicine .
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines , no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public .
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children , and even adults .
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact , part of the Health Impact News network .

COVID-19: The Spearpoint for Rolling Out a “New Era” of High-Risk, Genetically Engineered Vaccines
By the Children’s Health Defense Team
[Note: This article represents Part I of a two-part series examining COVID-19 vaccine technologies and their implications.]
For weeks, talking heads have been promoting the liability-free vaccine(s) that will save the world—so Bill Gates and Tony Fauci proclaim—from what Gates has now dubbed “Pandemic I.”
As Microsoft News peddles self-congratulatory stories about the Gates Foundation’s reorientation of its priorities to devote “‘total attention’ to the pandemic,” Fauci—making the rounds of talk shows—pledges that a vaccine will make its debut in January 2021.
Not to be outdone, the White House has now unveiled “Operation Warp Speed”—a joint pharmaceutical-government-military effort aimed at “substantially shrinking the development time for a vaccine”—and President Trump promises one by the end of the year.
Planet-wide COVID-19 vaccination—the overt objective that has all of these players salivating in anticipation—ignores a number of irrefutable obstacles.
For one, the RNA virus being targeted, SARS-CoV-2, already “has mutated into at least 30 different genetic variants.” The variants include 19 never seen before as well as “rare changes that scientists had never imagined could happen.”
Knowledge about these mutations may prove useful to clinicians wanting to better tailor their COVID-19 treatments, but the proliferation of mutations makes the chances of developing an effective vaccine immensely more uncertain.
Not to worry, say the entities funded by Gates (and also the Pentagon). Scientists working in the burgeoning field of synthetic biology are confident that they can “outdo” and outsmart nature using next-generation vaccine technologies such as gene transfer and self-assembling nanoparticles—along with invasive new vaccine delivery and record-keeping mechanisms such as smartphone-readable quantum dot tattoos.
Does it matter that the researchers who have been experimenting with these approaches have never been able to overcome “nasty side effects”?
Apparently not. Aided and abetted by the generous Gates and military funding, high-fanfare COVID-19 vaccine planning is proceeding apace.
Speed, not safety
From a manufacturing standpoint, vaccine makers—and particularly those making viral vaccines—have long chafed at the limitations of traditional vaccine technologies, which rely on processes that necessarily entail “a considerable lag time between antigen production and vaccine delivery.”
Researchers reiterated this point again in 2018, writing in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery that:
“for most emerging virus vaccines, the main obstacle is not the effectiveness of conventional approaches but the need for more rapid development and large-scale deployment.”
In the 1980s, manufacturers were elated when scientists developed new genetic engineering techniques (recombinant DNA technology) that—through the use of “expression systems” (bacteria, yeast, insect cells, mammalian cells or plants such as tobacco)—made it possible to jumpstart vaccine production and produce so-called “subunit vaccines.”
The hepatitis B vaccine was the first to employ this “entirely new” vaccine production approach, and a number of the COVID-19 vaccines currently in the works are deploying these techniques.
However, a complicating factor of subunit vaccines is that they must be bundled with “immunopotentiating” adjuvants that tend to trigger an imbalanced immune response.
Desirous of streamlining vaccine technology still further and enabling vaccine stockpiles in an even shorter time frame, researchers began tinkering in the mid-1990s with nucleic acid vaccines, which include DNA vaccines and messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines.
As a form of gene therapy, both represent a significant departure from classical vaccines.
Whereas the latter introduce a vaccine antigen to produce an immune response, nucleic acid vaccines instead send the body instructions to produce the antigen itself.
As one researcher explains, the nucleic acids “cause the cells to make pieces of the virus,” with the goal being that the immune system then “mounts a response to those pieces of the virus.”
Researchers quickly learned that both the DNA and mRNA vaccine options have serious downsides, and as a result, vaccines of this type have never been licensed.
Nonetheless, almost one-fourth (20/83) of the vaccines listed by the World Health Organization as COVID-19 “candidate vaccines” as of April 23—including two of the leading contenders—are DNA (Inovio) or mRNA (Moderna) vaccines (see table).
DNA vaccines
DNA vaccines are intended to penetrate all the way into a cell’s nucleus. According to one biotech scientist,
“This is an incredibly difficult task given that our nuclei have evolved to prevent any foreign DNA from entering (Think viruses!).”
Not surprisingly, then, when some DNA vaccines made it into clinical trials in the late 2000s, they were plagued by “suboptimal potency.”
Scientists then came up with the idea of solving this problem by augmenting vaccine delivery with “electroporation”—electric shocks applied to the vaccine site (using a “smart device”) to make cell membranes more permeable and force the DNA into the cells.
The improvements in vaccine efficacy were significant enough that electroporation remains a key design feature of some COVID-19 vaccine candidates today, including the Moderna vaccine that is now speeding toward Phase 2 clinical trials.
A second aspect of DNA vaccines—their gene-altering properties—is even more troubling and remains unresolved.
DNA vaccines, by definition, come with the risk of “integration of exogenous DNA into the host genome, which may cause severe mutagenesis and induced new diseases.”
Framed in more understandable terms:
“disruption from DNA is like inserting a foreign ingredient in an existing recipe, which can change the resulting dish.”
The permanent incorporation of synthetic genes into the recipient’s DNA essentially produces a genetically modified human being, with unknown long-term effects.
Speaking of DNA gene therapy, one researcher has stated, “Genetic integrations using viral gene therapies . . . can have a devastating effect if the integration was placed in the wrong spot in [the] genome.”
Discussing DNA vaccines specifically, the Harvard College Global Health Review elaborates:
Potential side effects could include chronic inflammation, because the vaccine continuously stimulates the immune system to produce antibodies. Other concerns include the possible integration of plasmid DNA into the body’s host genome, resulting in mutations, problems with DNA replication, triggering of autoimmune responses, and activation of cancer-causing genes.
mRNA vaccines
Because mRNA vaccines are “particularly suited to speedy development,” it is perhaps unsurprising that they are attracting attention as the “coronavirus frontrunners.”
mRNA vaccines can reportedly generate savings of “months or years to standardize and ramp up . . . mass production.” Making lemonade out of lemons, insiders casually state that:
“while no mRNA vaccine has ever been licensed, the threat of a pandemic is a great incentive to accelerate their progress.”
Companies are enamored of the mRNA approach despite observations that the large mRNA molecules are “intrinsically unstable,” “prone to degradation” and may overactivate the immune system.
On the plus side, from vaccine scientists’ standpoint, mRNA vaccines need only reach the cell cytoplasm rather than the nucleus—an apparently “simpler technical challenge”—although the approach still demands “delivery technologies that can ensure stabilization of mRNA under physiological conditions.”
Formulations such as Moderna’s mRNA-1273 vaccine tackle these challenges by using “chemical modifications to stabilize the mRNA” and liquid nanoparticles to “package it into an injectable form.”
mRNA approaches seem to attract researchers with a highly mechanistic view of human beings.
One such individual praises mRNA for its “inherent ‘programmability,” stating:
“Much like [a] computer [operating system], mRNA therapy can reprogram [one’s] body to produce its own therapies” [emphasis in original].
The CEO of Moderna describes mRNA approaches—which use “custom-built” strands of mRNA to “turn the body’s cells into ad hoc drug factories”—as being “like software: You can just turn the crank and get a lot of products going into development.”
Likewise, the journal Nature (commenting on mRNA technology from “a biotech and industrial perspective”) enthuses that the approach “allows rapid refinement with almost limitless combinations of derivatives.”
Vaccine researchers familiar with both DNA and mRNA vaccines like to play up mRNA vaccine safety, citing the fact that the vaccines do not have to penetrate the cell nucleus.
However, with years of mRNA vaccine experimentation behind them, none of these researchers has yet achieved licensure.
Why?
One answer may be that in preclinical studies, mRNA vaccines have displayed an “intrinsic” inflammatory component that makes it difficult to establish an “acceptable risk/benefit profile.”
mRNA enthusiasts admit that there is, as yet, an inadequate understanding of the inflammation and autoimmune reactions that may result.
This raises many questions about what will happen if regulators grant the manufacturers of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines their wish for “a fast-track process to get mRNA vaccines to people sooner.”
Racing toward profits
The hijacking of nearly all economic, social, artistic and religious activity by SARS-CoV-2 is disturbing on many levels, not least because of what it reveals about the public’s uncritical acceptance of official spin and its yearning for medical silver bullets.
As a vaccine researcher at Sweden’s Karolinska Institute has stated:
When China quarantined an entire megacity in January, People said “only China can do that.” Then we saw similarly drastic measures in several democratic countries. I think it says something about our trust in medical solutions. Today, we expect to be able to develop medicines and vaccines against different diseases in a way we didn’t in the past.
The rush to develop gene-tampering COVID-19 vaccines is also accelerating the conjoined-twins fusion of pharma and biotech. The lucrative biopharma sector is now the fastest-growing segment of the global drug industry, currently representing 20% of the worldwide market and displaying an annual growth rate that is more than double that of conventional pharma.
And COVID-19 vaccines are helping rescue some biopharma companies’ shaky bottom lines.
In 2017, for example, Moderna was struggling to “keep afloat its brash promise to reinvent medicine” after an experimental therapy that it was counting on proved too unsafe to test in humans.
Fast forward to 2020, when “bad news about the coronavirus is good news for Moderna stock.” Other biopharma companies formerly on the skids are likewise poised to make record profits from COVID-19.
As biopharma pursues its unfettered, medical-ethics-be-damned race toward a COVID-19 pot of gold, the public needs to take a critical look at the industry’s disincentives for safety and also take a firm stand against the horrifying prospect of coronavirus vaccine mandates.
Otherwise, genetically engineered COVID-19 vaccines are likely to start permanently altering genes, triggering autoimmunity and serving as the catalyst for other vaccine injuries or deaths, and—unhampered by any legal liability—none of the commercial or government actors responsible will likely care.
Read the full article at ChildrensHealthDefense.org.
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.
© 2020 Children’s Health Defense, Inc.
This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc.
Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support them in their efforts.
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Book – The Vaccine Court “The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program” ORDER HERE!
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
Order here!
Make a Statement for Health Freedom!
Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children, and even adults.
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact, part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!