healthimpactnews--2020-06-15--Fluoride Trial Week 1: Scientist Says He Was Threatened Because of Fluoride Study

# FluorideTrial : Scientist Says He Was Threatened Because of Fluoride Study – Week 1 In Review By Derrick Broze , The Last American Vagabond Activist Post The first week of the historic water fluoridation trial wrapped up on Friday afternoon after four days of occasionally tense testimony from expert witnesses with the Fluoride Action Network ( FAN ) and the U.S Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ) .
One expert witness claimed he had been coerced into signing a statement downplaying his study which claimed fluoride is a neurotoxicant .
Another witness confirmed that at least one type of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the water supply .
Attorneys with FAN argue that water fluoridation violates the 1970 Toxic Substances Control Act provisions which prohibit the “ particular use ” of a chemical which has been found to present an unreasonable risk to the general public .
Under section 21 of the TSCA citizens are allowed to petition the EPA to regulate or ban individual chemicals .
The EPA is represented by lawyers from the Department of Justice who are presenting experts from the corporate firm Exponent Inc .
The government is defending water fluoridation and seeking @ @ @ @ @ @ @ plaintiffs .
The plaintiffs in the case include : FAN , Moms Against Fluoridation , Food & Water Watch , the American Academy of Environmental Medicine , the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology and the Organic Consumers Association .
FAN attorney Michael Connett called 3 witnesses throughout the week , including Howard Hu MD , Bruce Lanphear MD , Philippe Grandjean MD , and Kathleen Thiessen PhD .
Connett told the court that the EPA has previously relied on the research of all of these experts in the past on other @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of these experts have been authors of key fluoride studies funded by US government agencies .
Connett noted that the EPA chose to use experts from Exponent rather than their own agencies experts .
The EPA did their part to question the Fluoride Action Network ’ s witnesses and diminish their credibility .
Dr. KathleenThiessen made a powerful admission when interviewed by FAN attorney Connett , stating that sodium fluoride is a pesticide that is being added to the water supply .
However , during cross examination of Thiessen , the EPA asked @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Connett family , including Paul Connett , Director of the Fluoride Action Network , and Michaell Connett , the lawyer representing FAN .
Thiessen said yes she is friends with the family .
The EPA pressed further , asking if she had attended meetings sponsored by FAN , whether she is on the group ’ s mailing list , if she has appeared in interviews on their websites , and if she helped Paul Connett with his book The Case Against Fluoride .
Dr. Thiessen answered affirmatively to these questions but denied it @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fluoride is harmful .
When questioned whether or not she has been advocating for removing fluoride for decades , while maintaining a friendship with the plaintiffs , Thiessen said yes , but emphasized that her position was based on science .
The EPA then showed the court emails between plaintiff ’ s attorney Michael Connet and Thiessen .
Connett sent Thiessen a list of studies to review and the EPA was attempting to show the judge that the plaintiff ’ s may have influenced Thiessen ’ s opinions and statements .
Dr. Howard @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on fluoride , testifying on the difficulty of getting his research funded by the National Institute of Health and the steps for publication in the Environmental Health Perspectives journal .
Hu stated that his study found a loss of around 3 or 4 IQ points and this impact on population should not be ignored .
He also discussed the parallels to lead neurotoxicity .
One of the strongest witnesses for the plaintiffs was Danish environmental epidemiologist Dr. Phillip Grandjean , known for his work on the neurotoxicity of mercury .
Granjean helped the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the diet .
Dr. Grandjean stated that he had been threatened or coerced by a colleague at the Harvard Dental School after one of his studies concluded that fluoride was a neurotoxin .
When DOJ lawyer Debra Carfora asked Grandjean about a statement he signed downplaying the significance of the results , Grandjean stated that the Harvard press department put the statement together and added his name to it .
The statement said the researchers still agreed with the CDC position that water fluoridation is safe .
Dr. Grandjean did not elaborate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ such threats may happen in his field .
He also stated that the “ fluoride lobby ” infiltrated a World Health Organization committee seeking to exclude any mention of harmful effects of fluoride .
On the specific harmful effects of fluoride , Dr. Grandjean stated in his deposition that , Dr. Grandjean has also stated that efforts to control human fluoride exposure need to focus on pregnant women and small children .
During his testimony Granjean took particular issue with statements made by the EPA ’ s expert Dr. Cheng .
This issue @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for Exponent was a theme of several of the plaintiffs ’ witnesses .
At least two of the EPA ’ s witnesses – Ellen Chang , ScD and Joyce Tsuji , PhD – are employed by Exponent Inc , a firm accused of paying the U.S. government to defend dangerous chemicals .
Plaintiff ’ s witness Dr. Lamphear also called out the scientists working for Exponent as industry friendly “ rent-a-white-coats.
” The apparent conflicts of interest were the topic of conversation again on Friday when FAN attorney Michael Connett cross examined the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , a board-certified toxicologist and a Fellow of the Academy of Toxicological Sciences , who specializes in risk assessment of chemical exposures .
Connett asked Dr. Tsuji if she has been funded by mining and smelting companies which “ release arsenic into the air.
” Connett also asked Tsuji if the majority of her projects have been funded by industry .
Tsuji agreed that most of her work has come from industry funded sources .
The afternoon ended with plans for Dr. Tsuji to be cross examined by the plaintiff ’ s attorneys @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 15 , at 8:30 am pacific .
Stay tuned to The Last American Vagabond for updates .
Question Everything , Come To Your Own Conclusions .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

#FluorideTrial: Scientist Says He Was Threatened Because of Fluoride Study – Week 1 In Review
By Derrick Broze, The Last American Vagabond
Activist Post
#FluorideTrial: Experts Admit Fluoride is a Pesticide
The first week of the historic water fluoridation trial wrapped up on Friday afternoon after four days of occasionally tense testimony from expert witnesses with the Fluoride Action Network (FAN) and the U.S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). One expert witness claimed he had been coerced into signing a statement downplaying his study which claimed fluoride is a neurotoxicant. Another witness confirmed that at least one type of fluoride is a pesticide being added to the water supply.
Attorneys with FAN argue that water fluoridation violates the 1970 Toxic Substances Control Act provisions which prohibit the “particular use” of a chemical which has been found to present an unreasonable risk to the general public. Under section 21 of the TSCA citizens are allowed to petition the EPA to regulate or ban individual chemicals.
The EPA is represented by lawyers from the Department of Justice who are presenting experts from the corporate firm Exponent Inc. The government is defending water fluoridation and seeking a dismissal of the petition by the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs in the case include: FAN, Moms Against Fluoridation, Food & Water Watch, the American Academy of Environmental Medicine, the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology and the Organic Consumers Association.
FAN attorney Michael Connett called 3 witnesses throughout the week, including Howard Hu MD, Bruce Lanphear MD, Philippe Grandjean MD, and Kathleen Thiessen PhD. Connett told the court that the EPA has previously relied on the research of all of these experts in the past on other toxicants like lead and mercury. Two of these experts have been authors of key fluoride studies funded by US government agencies. Connett noted that the EPA chose to use experts from Exponent rather than their own agencies experts.
The EPA did their part to question the Fluoride Action Network’s witnesses and diminish their credibility. Dr. KathleenThiessen made a powerful admission when interviewed by FAN attorney Connett, stating that sodium fluoride is a pesticide that is being added to the water supply. However, during cross examination of Thiessen, the EPA asked if she is personal friends with the Connett family, including Paul Connett, Director of the Fluoride Action Network, and Michaell Connett, the lawyer representing FAN. Thiessen said yes she is friends with the family. The EPA pressed further, asking if she had attended meetings sponsored by FAN, whether she is on the group’s mailing list, if she has appeared in interviews on their websites, and if she helped Paul Connett with his book The Case Against Fluoride.
Dr. Thiessen answered affirmatively to these questions but denied it had any influence on her conclusions that fluoride is harmful. When questioned whether or not she has been advocating for removing fluoride for decades, while maintaining a friendship with the plaintiffs, Thiessen said yes, but emphasized that her position was based on science. The EPA then showed the court emails between plaintiff’s attorney Michael Connet and Thiessen. Connett sent Thiessen a list of studies to review and the EPA was attempting to show the judge that the plaintiff’s may have influenced Thiessen’s opinions and statements.
Dr. Howard Hu provided further background on his research on fluoride, testifying on the difficulty of getting his research funded by the National Institute of Health and the steps for publication in the Environmental Health Perspectives journal. Hu stated that his study found a loss of around 3 or 4 IQ points and this impact on population should not be ignored. He also discussed the parallels to lead neurotoxicity.
Corruption of Fluoride Science
One of the strongest witnesses for the plaintiffs was Danish environmental epidemiologist Dr. Phillip Grandjean, known for his work on the neurotoxicity of mercury. Granjean helped the EPA establish safe regulatory levels for mercury in the diet.
Dr. Grandjean stated that he had been threatened or coerced by a colleague at the Harvard Dental School after one of his studies concluded that fluoride was a neurotoxin. When DOJ lawyer Debra Carfora asked Grandjean about a statement he signed downplaying the significance of the results, Grandjean stated that the Harvard press department put the statement together and added his name to it. The statement said the researchers still agreed with the CDC position that water fluoridation is safe. Dr. Grandjean did not elaborate upon who threatened him or how often such threats may happen in his field. He also stated that the “fluoride lobby” infiltrated a World Health Organization committee seeking to exclude any mention of harmful effects of fluoride.
On the specific harmful effects of fluoride, Dr. Grandjean stated in his deposition that,
“the weight of epidemiological evidence leaves no reasonable doubt that developmental neurotoxicity is a serious human health risk associated with elevated fluoride exposure.”
Dr. Grandjean has also stated that efforts to control human fluoride exposure need to focus on pregnant women and small children.
During his testimony Granjean took particular issue with statements made by the EPA’s expert Dr. Cheng.
“What she has written should not be relied upon… This is not science, this is simply a misleading report.” Grandjean elaborated, stating, “I’m embarrassed that the EPA would recruit Dr. Chang, who has already tried to kill some of my work on polyfluorinated chemicals, that they would recruit her to write this report full of biases. I get a little upset about it… I’m sorry to see what has happened to a colleague that works for a product defense firm.”
This issue of the EPA’s experts working for Exponent was a theme of several of the plaintiffs’ witnesses. At least two of the EPA’s witnesses – Ellen Chang, ScD and Joyce Tsuji, PhD – are employed by Exponent Inc, a firm accused of paying the U.S. government to defend dangerous chemicals. Plaintiff’s witness Dr. Lamphear also called out the scientists working for Exponent as industry friendly “rent-a-white-coats.”
The apparent conflicts of interest were the topic of conversation again on Friday when FAN attorney Michael Connett cross examined the government’s witness Dr. Joyce Tsuji, a board-certified toxicologist and a Fellow of the Academy of Toxicological Sciences, who specializes in risk assessment of chemical exposures. Connett asked Dr. Tsuji if she has been funded by mining and smelting companies which “release arsenic into the air.” Connett also asked Tsuji if the majority of her projects have been funded by industry. Tsuji agreed that most of her work has come from industry funded sources.
The afternoon ended with plans for Dr. Tsuji to be cross examined by the plaintiff’s attorneys. Court will resume on Monday June 15, at 8:30 am pacific.
Stay tuned to The Last American Vagabond for updates.
Question Everything, Come To Your Own Conclusions.
Source: The Last American Vagabond
Read the full article at ActivistPost.com.
Media Blackout: The Federal Court Case To End Water Fluoridation!
by Spiro Skouras
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-06-16--COVID Vaccine Will Only be Good for a Short Time – Multiple Shots Will be Needed

Pharmaceutical companies racing to fast-track a COVID vaccine are already warning the public that any vaccine that comes into the market will probably only offer temporary “ protection , ” laying the ground work for a COVID vaccine that will probably be similar to the annual flu vaccine , where a new shot is needed every year .
The flu vaccine is already the most dangerous vaccine in the market , comprising the bulk of settlements for injuries and deaths in the U.S .
Vaccine Court .
( Previously published reports for vaccine settlements for injuries and deaths by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the marketing trade publication for the vaccine industry , quoted AstraZeneca CEO Pascal Soriot from an interview he gave on a Belgian radio station : FiercePharma also reports that AstraZeneca expects to have their vaccine ready by October this year : Soriot is not the only one saying that multiple shots will be needed for COVID treatment .
Dr. Fauci has said the same thing , as Marco Cáceres reports in this article from The Vaccine Reaction .
COVID-19 Vaccine Will Likely Be Given Multiple Times , Perhaps Annually In an interview @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2020 , Anthony Fauci , MD , director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ( NIAID ) said that while he was “ cautiously optimistic ” about the effectiveness of the vaccines being developed for COVID-19 , he was concerned that any protection the vaccines may provide might only be temporary .
Fauci and others developing or promoting COVID-19 vaccination are talking about the likelihood that the new coronavirus vaccine will have to be administered in multiple doses , perhaps even annually like the influenza vaccine .
There are @ @ @ @ @ @ @ world working on candidate vaccines for COVID-19 , including 10 that have reached the clinical evaluation stage , either phase 1 or phase 2 .
Among these are programs led by Western pharmaceutical companies such as AstraZeneca plc ( in partnership with the University of Oxford ) ; BioNTech SE partnered with Pfizer , Inc. ; Inovio Pharmaceuticals , Inc. ; Moderna , Inc. ( in partnership with NIAID ) and Novavax , Inc. Another 123 programs to develop a COVID-19 vaccine remain in preclinical evaluation.4 According to Dr. Fauci , “ It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be effective.
” He believes that the phase 3 randomized , placebo-controlled trials involving thousands of people will provide the data needed to better evaluate the potential effectiveness of the candidate vaccines .
The messenger RNA ( mRNA ) vaccine being fast tracked to licensure by Moderna , Inc. , which is funded not only by NIAID but also by the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness ( CEPI ) and half a billion dollars from the federal Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority ( BARDA ) ,5 as well as the AstraZeneca/Oxford coronavirus vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ phase 3 trials later this summer .
Dr. Fauci ’ s said he is less worried about whether someone would get a “ protective response ” from a COVID-19 vaccine than he is about the “ durability ” of that response .
Vaccinologist Greg Poland , MD of the Mayo Clinic noted that immunity for seasonal coronaviruses may last several years or as little as 80 days .
COVID-19 Vaccine Likely Given Several Times or Annually Vaccinologists like Fauci and Poland , who are expressing uncertainty about the length of protection a COVID-19 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine will be required over the course of about a month and that a booster shot may also be needed a few years later .
In a recent article for USA Today , Elizabeth Weise wrote , Immunologist Barry Bloom , PhD of Harvard University ’ s T.H Chan School of Public Health said : Scott Gottlieb , MD , who joined the board of directors of Pfizer after resigning as Commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) in March 2019 , recently @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ( like the one Pfizer is developing ) may have to be an annual shot .
This is probably going to be a seasonal vaccine , the coronavirus vaccine .
It ’ s probably a vaccine that we ’ re going to need to take every year , and Dr. Fauci is right… the immunity is not going to be long-term in the form of like a smallpox vaccine or a polio vaccine where you get the vaccine once and you ’ re protected for life or most of your life , or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ going to need to take this shot regularly and maybe annually and the immunity might last up to a year.8 9 Pfizer and its German partner BioNTech recently began clinical trials in the United States testing one and two doses of their experimental BNT162 vaccine for COVID-19 on human subjects.10 Read the full article at The Vaccine Reaction Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com Dr. Judy Mikovits and Dr. Sherri Tenpenny : A New COVID Vaccine Could Kill 50 Million People in the U.S. 1 JAMA Network .
Coronavirus Q & A With @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2 , 2020 .
2 Lovelace B. Dr. Anthony Fauci says there ’ s a chance coronavirus vaccine may not provide immunity for very long .
CNBC June 3 , 2020 .
3 Rodriguez A. Fauci says he ’ s optimistic about coronavirus vaccine protection but concerned how long it will last .
USA Today June 4 , 2020 .
4 World Health Organization .
Draft landscape of COVID-19 candidate vaccines .
June 2 , 2020 .
5 Fisher BL .
COVID-19 Meltdown and Pharma ’ s Big Money Win .
The Vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 6 Medical Xpress .
Fauci says any COVID-19 vaccine would be in plentiful supply by 2021 .
June 4 , 2020 .
7 Weise E. A coronavirus vaccine could require you to get two shots .
Here ’ s why .
USA Today June 4 , 2020 .
8 TVR Staff .
Former FDA Commissioner Gottlieb Joins Pfizer .
The Vaccine Reaction July 10 , 2019 .
9 CNBC Television .
Expect Covid-19 vaccine to be seasonal like the flu shot : Former FDA chief .
YouTube June 3 , 2020 .
10 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Human Clinical Trials of COVID-19 Vaccine in U.S .
The Vaccine Reaction May 25 , 2020 .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist ( kidney doctor ) , Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people .
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real , ethical medicine .
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public .
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children , and even adults .
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact , part of the Health Impact News network .

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Pharmaceutical companies racing to fast-track a COVID vaccine are already warning the public that any vaccine that comes into the market will probably only offer temporary “protection,” laying the ground work for a COVID vaccine that will probably be similar to the annual flu vaccine, where a new shot is needed every year.
The flu vaccine is already the most dangerous vaccine in the market, comprising the bulk of settlements for injuries and deaths in the U.S. Vaccine Court. (Previously published reports for vaccine settlements for injuries and deaths by the DOJ are found here.)
FiercePharma, the marketing trade publication for the vaccine industry, quoted AstraZeneca CEO Pascal Soriot from an interview he gave on a Belgian radio station:
“We think that it will protect for about a year.”
FiercePharma also reports that AstraZeneca expects to have their vaccine ready by October this year:
Soriot said that “if all goes well, we will have the results of the clinical trials in August/September,” as quoted by Reuters. “We are manufacturing in parallel,” he added. “We will be ready to deliver from October if all goes well.”
Read the full article here.
Soriot is not the only one saying that multiple shots will be needed for COVID treatment. Dr. Fauci has said the same thing, as Marco Cáceres reports in this article from The Vaccine Reaction.
COVID-19 Vaccine Will Likely Be Given Multiple Times, Perhaps Annually
by Marco Cáceres
The Vaccine Reaction
In an interview with the JAMA on June 2, 2020, Anthony Fauci, MD, director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) said that while he was “cautiously optimistic” about the effectiveness of the vaccines being developed for COVID-19, he was concerned that any protection the vaccines may provide might only be temporary.
“If you look at the duration of protection when you recover from one of the several benign coronaviruses that cause the common cold, the durability of infection is only measured in a year or less as opposed to the other infections where you can get 15 to 20 years of protection,” Dr. Fauci said.1 2 3
Fauci and others developing or promoting COVID-19 vaccination are talking about the likelihood that the new coronavirus vaccine will have to be administered in multiple doses, perhaps even annually like the influenza vaccine.
There are more than 100 research programs around the world working on candidate vaccines for COVID-19, including 10 that have reached the clinical evaluation stage, either phase 1 or phase 2.
Among these are programs led by Western pharmaceutical companies such as AstraZeneca plc (in partnership with the University of Oxford); BioNTech SE partnered with Pfizer, Inc.; Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Moderna, Inc. (in partnership with NIAID) and Novavax, Inc.
Another 123 programs to develop a COVID-19 vaccine remain in preclinical evaluation.4
Doubts About Coronavirus Vaccine Long Term Effectiveness
According to Dr. Fauci, “It is still not clear which vaccine will be effective.” He believes that the phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled trials involving thousands of people will provide the data needed to better evaluate the potential effectiveness of the candidate vaccines.
The messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine being fast tracked to licensure by Moderna, Inc., which is funded not only by NIAID but also by the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness (CEPI) and half a billion dollars from the federal Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA),5 as well as the AstraZeneca/Oxford coronavirus vaccine development programs are scheduled to proceed to phase 3 trials later this summer.
“The real business end of this all will be the phase 3 that starts in the first week of July, hopefully. We want to get as many data points as we can,” Dr. Fauci said. “I’m cautiously optimistic that with the multiple candidates we have with different platforms, that we’re going to have a vaccine that shows a degree of efficacy that will make it deployable.”1 6
Dr. Fauci’s said he is less worried about whether someone would get a “protective response” from a COVID-19 vaccine than he is about the “durability” of that response.
Vaccinologist Greg Poland, MD of the Mayo Clinic noted that immunity for seasonal coronaviruses may last several years or as little as 80 days.
“There’s an immunologic secret locked up in the long class of coronaviruses that we don’t yet understand,” Dr. Poland said.1 2 3 6
COVID-19 Vaccine Likely Given Several Times or Annually
Vaccinologists like Fauci and Poland, who are expressing uncertainty about the length of protection a COVID-19 vaccine would provide, have reinforced speculation that two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine will be required over the course of about a month and that a booster shot may also be needed a few years later. In a recent article for USA Today, Elizabeth Weise wrote,
“The first shot would prime the immune system, helping it recognize the virus. The second shot would strengthen the immune response.”7
Immunologist Barry Bloom, PhD of Harvard University’s T.H Chan School of Public Health said:
As far as I am aware, with one set of exceptions, all the front-line vaccine developers are contemplating two shots. The one exception is Merck, which last week pushed forward on two vaccines, each of which they hoped would be one-shot vaccines.7
Scott Gottlieb, MD, who joined the board of directors of Pfizer after resigning as Commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in March 2019, recently told CNBC that a vaccine for COVID-19 (like the one Pfizer is developing) may have to be an annual shot.
Gottlieb said:
This is probably going to be a seasonal vaccine, the coronavirus vaccine. It’s probably a vaccine that we’re going to need to take every year, and Dr. Fauci is right… the immunity is not going to be long-term in the form of like a smallpox vaccine or a polio vaccine where you get the vaccine once and you’re protected for life or most of your life, or a measles vaccine. You’re going to need to take this shot regularly and maybe annually and the immunity might last up to a year.8 9
Pfizer and its German partner BioNTech recently began clinical trials in the United States testing one and two doses of their experimental BNT162 vaccine for COVID-19 on human subjects.10
Read the full article at The Vaccine Reaction
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com
See Also:
References
1 JAMA Network. Coronavirus Q&A With Anthony Fauci, MD. YouTube June 2, 2020.
2 Lovelace B. Dr. Anthony Fauci says there’s a chance coronavirus vaccine may not provide immunity for very long. CNBC June 3, 2020.
3 Rodriguez A. Fauci says he’s optimistic about coronavirus vaccine protection but concerned how long it will last. USA Today June 4, 2020.
4 World Health Organization. Draft landscape of COVID-19 candidate vaccines. June 2, 2020.
5 Fisher BL. COVID-19 Meltdown and Pharma’s Big Money Win. The Vaccine Reaction Apr. 13, 2020.
6 Medical Xpress. Fauci says any COVID-19 vaccine would be in plentiful supply by 2021. June 4, 2020.
7 Weise E. A coronavirus vaccine could require you to get two shots. Here’s why. USA Today June 4, 2020.
8 TVR Staff. Former FDA Commissioner Gottlieb Joins Pfizer. The Vaccine Reaction July 10, 2019.
9 CNBC Television. Expect Covid-19 vaccine to be seasonal like the flu shot: Former FDA chief. YouTube June 3, 2020.
10 TVR Staff. Pfizer and BioNTech Begin Human Clinical Trials of COVID-19 Vaccine in U.S. The Vaccine Reaction May 25, 2020.
See Also:
Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Book – The Vaccine Court “The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program” ORDER HERE!
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
Order here!
Make a Statement for Health Freedom!
Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children, and even adults.
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact, part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!


healthimpactnews--2020-06-16--Virginia Has Provided the Nation with the Template for Mandatory Vaccines: Democracy Sacrificed for

Virginia Has Provided the Nation with the Template for Mandatory Vaccines: Democracy Sacrificed for Medical Tyranny

Virginia has now provided the nation with a blueprint on how to mandate a COVID vaccine , or any vaccine for that matter , even if the public is 100 % against it .
Hand over the decision to unelected medical authorities , and let them make the decision , even if it is not supported by the electorate , for the sake of the “ greater good.
” These unelected medical authorities exist in pretty much every community across the United States as members of the local “ Board of Health.
” These “ Board of Health ” medical @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to dictate medical intervention against the will of the public , and even against the will of elected officials .
These tyrannical medical authorities along with their cronies in politics ( in Virginia , Governor Ralph Northam , himself a medical doctor , appointed the members of the Board of Health ) continue the false narrative that they know what is best for the community , and that opposition to vaccines comes from uninformed parents , completely ignoring the fact that many of these parents are themselves medical doctors , scientists , attorneys @ @ @ @ @ @ @ If these medical tyrants even acknowledge the fact that these parents represent children damaged or killed by vaccines , their response is similar to what Virginia legislator Dawn Adams , a PhD nurse practitioner , stated publicly : So what do you say Americans ?
Are you going to comply with medical tyranny and potentially sacrifice the health , and maybe even the death , of your children on a fast-tracked COVID vaccine for “ the greater good ” ?
Virginia Legislature Gives CDC , Board of Health Power to Mandate Vaccines for @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Barbara Loe Fisher The Vaccine Reaction In the 2020 Legislative session , the Virginia Legislature passed H.B.1090 , a bill that amended a law requiring children attending public and private schools in the state to receive vaccines ( § 32.1-46 .
Immunization of patients against certain diseases ) .1 Virginia Delegate Patrick Hope ( D-Arlington ) was the lead sponsor of H.B .
1090 introduced on Jan. 8 , 2020 , which proposed to automatically mandate that children enrolled in daycare or school receive all current and future vaccines recommended by the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ACIP ) .
The final bill , passed by the Senate in March , granted Governor-appointed members of the Virginia Board of Health the authority to add federally recommended vaccines to the schedule required for school attendance with the exception of the annual influenza vaccination .
The bill included an exemption from the requirements of Article 2 of the Administrative Process Act ( § 2.2-4006 et seq .
of the Code of Virginia ) , effectively blocking Virginia citizens and elected legislators from participating in the decision-making process that creates new vaccine mandates @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , duly elected representatives in state legislatures have authority for making public health laws for state residents .
In handing the power to make vaccine laws to unelected members of a federal advisory committee and state Board of Health , the Virginia legislature has abdicated responsibility and accountability to constituents by cutting out elected representatives and the voters who elected them from the vaccine law making process.2 Although the new law provides for a 60-day public comment period after the Board of Health issues a Notice of Intended Regulatory Action to add a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ daycare and school attendance , the legislature will never again hold a public hearing where citizens can testify for or against the addition of a new vaccine mandate for children .
Under the new law , the state Board of Health composed of physicians and representatives of medical trade and pharmaceutical-related associations like the Medical Society of Virginia , Virginia Pharmacists Association , Virginia Nurses ’ Association,3 4 are expected to endorse vaccine use recommendations issued by members of the ACIP appointed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up to 10 more doses of five vaccines for daycare and school children , including vaccines that the Virginia legislature previously voted against adding to the schedule , such as the very expensive meningococcal vaccine and HPV vaccine for boys.5 H.B .
1090 , as amended , was passed during a special session held by the state legislature on Apr .
22 , 2020 during the COVID-19 lockdown .
Virginia Governor Ralph Northam , MD signed the bill into law with an effective date of July 1 , 2021.6 H.B .
1090 was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Welfare and Institutions Sub-Committee on Jan. 21 , when citizens , including parents , grandparents , nurses , doctors and scientists lined up to speak in opposition to the bill .
After the committee Chairman announced that the total amount of time allocated for those speaking in opposition to the bill would be limited to 10 minutes , the majority of people waiting to testify in opposition to the bill were denied the opportunity to speak .
Despite driving and waiting in long lines for hours , Virginia voters were shut out of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ policy which states that , The committee majority placed no time restrictions on those speaking in favor of the bill that would automatically mandate every vaccine the CDC recommends for all children , currently and in the future .
After a limited number of citizens spoke out against the bill , including those who described how their once healthy children regressed into chronic poor health or died after doctors administered CDC recommended vaccines to them , Delegate Dawn Adams ( D-68th District ) , a PhD nurse practitioner stated matter-of-factly : There was @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Adam ’ s remark .
It was a slap in the face to every parent who traveled to Richmond that day on behalf of a child who died after vaccination or whose children are suffering every day with vaccine injuries that will never go away .
Effectively decreeing that the sacrifice of some children is necessary to implement the proposed new law , the committee members moved on to other bills .
However , no one who attended the hearing or watched it that day will forget the cold admission by those voting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be harmed by a one-size-fits-all vaccination law that requires parents to choose between risking their children ’ s lives or giving them a school education .
After passing out of the House Health Committee on Jan. 28 , the bill moved to the House Appropriations Subcommittee .
Testimony was not limited for those in favor of the bill , while those opposed to the bill were allowed only 10 minutes each to speak and no testimony was permitted from individuals , who had spoken at the first hearing .
As the bill moved @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , testimony was only allowed from supporters of the bill , while those in opposition to the bill were denied the opportunity to speak at all .
On Feb. 10 , 2020 , HB 1090 was passed by the House of Delegates with a vote of 55 in support and 44 opposed before it moved on to the Senate.8 The Senate Health Subcommittee , which allowed 10 minutes of total testimony in opposition to the bill , was the final opportunity for public to be heard .
But the bill was passed by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and full Senate without taking public testimony from any member of the Commonwealth who opposed the bill .
Concerned parents with their children and other concerned citizens attempted to meet with Senators , packing the Senate halls for days , in an effort to voice their opposition to the escalating numbers of vaccines being required for daycare and school .
On Mar .
2 , 2020 , hundreds of protestors rallied in opposition on the Capitol grounds before the bill moved onto the full Senate .
Senators For and Against Bill Debate The @ @ @ @ @ @ @ for approximately one hour .
There were three amendments proposed and one adopted .
During the debate , retired Naval Officer Senator John Cosgrove ( R-District 14 ) acknowledged that ; We had a lot of people come by our offices , and in the Capital who have been very concerned about what we are doing here .
Now let me make this straight to everybody , these people are not crazy .
They are not flat- earthers .
These people probably know more about these vaccinations than anyone else on this floor @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , they looked at it and they researched it .
And some are genuinely frightened for the welfare of their children .
For us to be pushing further and further into their parental decisions for their children not our children but their children , I think is a terrible imposition…these are some very intelligent , well educated people .
I really hope that we will listen to mothers and fathers and let them decide for themselves and their families how to proceed on this vaccination route .
In contrast , Senator Dick Saslaw @ @ @ @ @ @ @ met with him to express their opposition to the bill ; Saslaw implied that mothers could not possibly have the knowledge or experience of the experts with medical degrees .
Many of the parents prepared to testify in opposition to the bill were doctors , nurses , scientists , lawyers and other college graduates , some of whom witnessed their children regress into chronic poor health after vaccination .
However , leaders in control of committees effectively blocked opposing testimony from doctors and other medical professionals .
Despite a personal appeal to Senator @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ) , chair of the Senate Health Committee , two doctors prepared to testify in opposition to the bill were denied the opportunity to speak .
Ultimately , parents of vaccine injured children and those whose children are vulnerable to harm from vaccination were effectively told , again , that even if it is safer for your child not to be vaccinated , you must put your child in harm ’ s way for “ the greater good ” in order for your child to receive a school education .
On Mar .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ narrowly passed the Senate with a vote of 21 in support and 18 opposed .
The automatic adoption by state public health officials of all new federally recommended vaccines to the required list for children to attend school in the Commonwealth without input from citizens and elected representatives is even more concerning because COVID-19 vaccines are being fast tracked to licensure .
While it normally takes 15 to 20 years to develop a vaccine , a vaccine for COVD-19 may be on the market by this September and federally recommended for use by @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Dan Barouch , a virologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston said ; To create coronavirus vaccines , vaccine manufacturers are using recombinant DNA , messenger RNA ( mRNA ) , nanoparticle and novel adjuvant technology , most of which has never been licensed for use in humans .
For example , Moderna , Inc. in partnership with NIAID is developing a COVID-19 vaccine that will inject human cells with mRNA , usually within lipid nanoparticles , to stimulate cells in the body to become manufacturers of viral proteins .
Inovio @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deliver optimized DNA to the cells of the body.11 GSK and Sanofi are also developing an experimental COVID-19 vaccine in collaboration with the U.S. government that will combine GSK ’ s oil adjuvant AS03 that was included in their H1N1 influenza vaccine , Pandemrix , with the insect cell-based recombinant DNA vaccine technology used by Sanofi Pasteur in their quadrivalent influenza vaccine , FluBlok.12 GSK ’ s Pandemrix vaccine , which was distributed in Europe during 2009/2010 , has been linked to narcolepsy , especially in children.13 14 15 Will an experimental coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ mandated for all Virginia school children after the CDC recommends it for every child ?
Because a law was passed in 2020 that allows state public health officials to automatically add every CDC recommended vaccine to the list of vaccines required for daycare and school entry—without public hearings or a vote by elected representatives in the legislature—it appears that the answer is “ yes.
” Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com .
1 § 32.1-46 .
Immunization of patients against certain diseases .
Code of Virginia .
2 Fisher BL .
Is a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ CDC Recommended Vaccination Coming to Your State ?
The Vaccine Reaction Jan. 17 , 2020 .
3 Virginia Department of Health .
Virginia State Board of Health Membership Roster July 2018 .
4 Sherlock JC .
Virginia Board of Health & Infrastructure of Influence .
Bacon ’ s Rebellion May 26 , 2020 .
5 NVIC Advocacy Portal .
6 HB 1090 Governor ’ s Recommendation .
7 Virginia General Assembly .
8 HB 1090 Immunizations ; regulations by State Board of Health .
Virginia ’ s Legislative Information System 2020 Session .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ by Autumn ?
The Vaccine Reaction Apr .
2 , 2020 .
10 Elias S. A New Entry in the race for a Coronavirus Vaccine : Hope .
The New York Times May 20 , 2020 .
11 Fisher BL .
COVID-19 Meltdown and Pharma ’ s Big Money Win .
The Vaccine Reaction Apr .
13 , 2020 .
12 Fisher BL , Parpia R. GSK and Sanofi COVID-19 Vaccine Produced in Insect Cells with Squalene Adjuvant .
The Vaccine Reaction .
May 4 , 2020 .
13 Vogel G. Why a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ July 1 , 2015 .
14 Brown , C. H1N1 vaccine and narcolepsy link discovered .
Canadian Medical Journal Association Sept. 8 , 2015 .
15 Sample I. Swine flu vaccine can trigger narcolepsy , UK government concedes .
The Guardian Sept. 19 , 2013 .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist ( kidney doctor ) , Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people .
In this autobiography she explains @ @ @ @ @ @ @ current corrupt medical system from practicing real , ethical medicine .
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines , no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public .
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children , and even adults .
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact , part of the Health Impact News network .

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Virginia has now provided the nation with a blueprint on how to mandate a COVID vaccine, or any vaccine for that matter, even if the public is 100% against it.
Hand over the decision to unelected medical authorities, and let them make the decision, even if it is not supported by the electorate, for the sake of the “greater good.”
These unelected medical authorities exist in pretty much every community across the United States as members of the local “Board of Health.”
These “Board of Health” medical authorities have been granted almost unlimited power to dictate medical intervention against the will of the public, and even against the will of elected officials.
These tyrannical medical authorities along with their cronies in politics (in Virginia, Governor Ralph Northam, himself a medical doctor, appointed the members of the Board of Health) continue the false narrative that they know what is best for the community, and that opposition to vaccines comes from uninformed parents, completely ignoring the fact that many of these parents are themselves medical doctors, scientists, attorneys and other professionals in the community.
If these medical tyrants even acknowledge the fact that these parents represent children damaged or killed by vaccines, their response is similar to what Virginia legislator Dawn Adams, a PhD nurse practitioner, stated publicly:
“We have to do the best job we have for the most people [and this] sometimes results in unintended consequences, and that is a tragedy and [an] across-the-board reality in medical care.”
So what do you say Americans? Are you going to comply with medical tyranny and potentially sacrifice the health, and maybe even the death, of your children on a fast-tracked COVID vaccine for “the greater good”?
Virginia Legislature Gives CDC, Board of Health Power to Mandate Vaccines for School Children
by Carolyn Hendler, JD and Barbara Loe Fisher
The Vaccine Reaction
In the 2020 Legislative session, the Virginia Legislature passed H.B.1090, a bill that amended a law requiring children attending public and private schools in the state to receive vaccines (§ 32.1-46. Immunization of patients against certain diseases).1
Virginia Delegate Patrick Hope (D-Arlington) was the lead sponsor of H.B. 1090 introduced on Jan. 8, 2020, which proposed to automatically mandate that children enrolled in daycare or school receive all current and future vaccines recommended by the federal Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).
The final bill, passed by the Senate in March, granted Governor-appointed members of the Virginia Board of Health the authority to add federally recommended vaccines to the schedule required for school attendance with the exception of the annual influenza vaccination.
The bill included an exemption from the requirements of Article 2 of the Administrative Process Act (§ 2.2-4006 et seq. of the Code of Virginia), effectively blocking Virginia citizens and elected legislators from participating in the decision-making process that creates new vaccine mandates for children.
Abdicating Responsibility & Accountability: Eliminating Voters from the Vaccine Law Making Process
Under the U.S. Constitution, duly elected representatives in state legislatures have authority for making public health laws for state residents.
In handing the power to make vaccine laws to unelected members of a federal advisory committee and state Board of Health, the Virginia legislature has abdicated responsibility and accountability to constituents by cutting out elected representatives and the voters who elected them from the vaccine law making process.2
Although the new law provides for a 60-day public comment period after the Board of Health issues a Notice of Intended Regulatory Action to add a new vaccine to the required list for daycare and school attendance, the legislature will never again hold a public hearing where citizens can testify for or against the addition of a new vaccine mandate for children.
Under the new law, the state Board of Health composed of physicians and representatives of medical trade and pharmaceutical-related associations like the Medical Society of Virginia, Virginia Pharmacists Association, Virginia Nurses’ Association,3 4 are expected to endorse vaccine use recommendations issued by members of the ACIP appointed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
The new law automatically adds up to 10 more doses of five vaccines for daycare and school children, including vaccines that the Virginia legislature previously voted against adding to the schedule, such as the very expensive meningococcal vaccine and HPV vaccine for boys.5
H.B. 1090, as amended, was passed during a special session held by the state legislature on Apr. 22, 2020 during the COVID-19 lockdown. Virginia Governor Ralph Northam, MD signed the bill into law with an effective date of July 1, 2021.6
Strong Public Opposition in Legislative Committee Hearings
H.B. 1090 was first heard in the House Health, Welfare and Institutions Sub-Committee on Jan. 21, when citizens, including parents, grandparents, nurses, doctors and scientists lined up to speak in opposition to the bill.
After the committee Chairman announced that the total amount of time allocated for those speaking in opposition to the bill would be limited to 10 minutes, the majority of people waiting to testify in opposition to the bill were denied the opportunity to speak.
Despite driving and waiting in long lines for hours, Virginia voters were shut out of the law-making process contrary to state legislative policy which states that,
“meetings of the General Assembly are required by law to be open to the public. Citizen testimony in committee and subcommittee is encouraged.”7
The committee majority placed no time restrictions on those speaking in favor of the bill that would automatically mandate every vaccine the CDC recommends for all children, currently and in the future.
After a limited number of citizens spoke out against the bill, including those who described how their once healthy children regressed into chronic poor health or died after doctors administered CDC recommended vaccines to them, Delegate Dawn Adams (D-68th District), a PhD nurse practitioner stated matter-of-factly:
But I feel like it is also very important to hear this and I know, it’s hard when you are a parent. Vaccinations are for the individual, they are, but they are also for the community and we live in communities. And I understand that sometimes [with] this medical availability [of vaccinations] that we have to do the best job we have for the most people [and this] sometimes results in unintended consequences, and that is a tragedy and [an] across-the-board reality in medical care.
There was an audible gasp in the room after Adam’s remark. It was a slap in the face to every parent who traveled to Richmond that day on behalf of a child who died after vaccination or whose children are suffering every day with vaccine injuries that will never go away.
Effectively decreeing that the sacrifice of some children is necessary to implement the proposed new law, the committee members moved on to other bills.
However, no one who attended the hearing or watched it that day will forget the cold admission by those voting for the bill that some children will be harmed by a one-size-fits-all vaccination law that requires parents to choose between risking their children’s lives or giving them a school education.
Limited or No Testimony Allowed
After passing out of the House Health Committee on Jan. 28, the bill moved to the House Appropriations Subcommittee. Testimony was not limited for those in favor of the bill, while those opposed to the bill were allowed only 10 minutes each to speak and no testimony was permitted from individuals, who had spoken at the first hearing.
As the bill moved through the other committees in the House, testimony was only allowed from supporters of the bill, while those in opposition to the bill were denied the opportunity to speak at all.
On Feb. 10, 2020, HB 1090 was passed by the House of Delegates with a vote of 55 in support and 44 opposed before it moved on to the Senate.8
The Senate Health Subcommittee, which allowed 10 minutes of total testimony in opposition to the bill, was the final opportunity for public to be heard. But the bill was passed by the full Health Committee, Appropriations Committee and full Senate without taking public testimony from any member of the Commonwealth who opposed the bill.
Concerned parents with their children and other concerned citizens attempted to meet with Senators, packing the Senate halls for days, in an effort to voice their opposition to the escalating numbers of vaccines being required for daycare and school.
On Mar. 2, 2020, hundreds of protestors rallied in opposition on the Capitol grounds before the bill moved onto the full Senate.
Senators For and Against Bill Debate
The full Senate debated the bill amongst themselves for approximately one hour. There were three amendments proposed and one adopted.
During the debate, retired Naval Officer Senator John Cosgrove (R-District 14) acknowledged that;
We had a lot of people come by our offices, and in the Capital who have been very concerned about what we are doing here. Now let me make this straight to everybody, these people are not crazy. They are not flat- earthers. These people probably know more about these vaccinations than anyone else on this floor and I mean anybody because they studied, they looked at it and they researched it. And some are genuinely frightened for the welfare of their children. For us to be pushing further and further into their parental decisions for their children not our children but their children, I think is a terrible imposition…these are some very intelligent, well educated people. I really hope that we will listen to mothers and fathers and let them decide for themselves and their families how to proceed on this vaccination route.
In contrast, Senator Dick Saslaw (D-35th District) belittled constituents who met with him to express their opposition to the bill;
There were a ton of moms who showed up all with their kids in opposition to it. Those people who spoke in favor of it were a group of various doctors representing various aspects of the medical profession. Let me repeat that, the people supporting this bill are the people who have to deal with these diseases. All of the emails and support I’ve gotten for this have come from doctors over the commonwealth and people who deal with diseases. Well, you say these people know what is best for their kids. In theory that may be right, except for the fact that they are not only putting their own kids in jeopardy but they are putting other people’s kids in jeopardy as well.
Saslaw implied that mothers could not possibly have the knowledge or experience of the experts with medical degrees. Many of the parents prepared to testify in opposition to the bill were doctors, nurses, scientists, lawyers and other college graduates, some of whom witnessed their children regress into chronic poor health after vaccination.
However, leaders in control of committees effectively blocked opposing testimony from doctors and other medical professionals. Despite a personal appeal to Senator Lillie Louise Boone Lucas (D-18th District), chair of the Senate Health Committee, two doctors prepared to testify in opposition to the bill were denied the opportunity to speak.
Ultimately, parents of vaccine injured children and those whose children are vulnerable to harm from vaccination were effectively told, again, that even if it is safer for your child not to be vaccinated, you must put your child in harm’s way for “the greater good” in order for your child to receive a school education.
On Mar. 3, 2020, H.B. 1090 narrowly passed the Senate with a vote of 21 in support and 18 opposed.
H.B. 1090 and New Coronavirus Vaccines
The automatic adoption by state public health officials of all new federally recommended vaccines to the required list for children to attend school in the Commonwealth without input from citizens and elected representatives is even more concerning because COVID-19 vaccines are being fast tracked to licensure.
While it normally takes 15 to 20 years to develop a vaccine, a vaccine for COVD-19 may be on the market by this September and federally recommended for use by all children and adults in 2021.9
Dr. Dan Barouch, a virologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston said;
What people don’t realize is that normally vaccine development takes many years, sometimes decades…and so trying to compress the whole vaccine process into 12 to 18 months is really unheard-of. 10
To create coronavirus vaccines, vaccine manufacturers are using recombinant DNA, messenger RNA (mRNA), nanoparticle and novel adjuvant technology, most of which has never been licensed for use in humans.
For example, Moderna, Inc. in partnership with NIAID is developing a COVID-19 vaccine that will inject human cells with mRNA, usually within lipid nanoparticles, to stimulate cells in the body to become manufacturers of viral proteins. Inovio’s DNA vaccine uses electricity to deliver optimized DNA to the cells of the body.11
GSK and Sanofi are also developing an experimental COVID-19 vaccine in collaboration with the U.S. government that will combine GSK’s oil adjuvant AS03 that was included in their H1N1 influenza vaccine, Pandemrix, with the insect cell-based recombinant DNA vaccine technology used by Sanofi Pasteur in their quadrivalent influenza vaccine, FluBlok.12 GSK’s Pandemrix vaccine, which was distributed in Europe during 2009/2010, has been linked to narcolepsy, especially in children.13 14 15
Will an experimental coronavirus vaccine that was rushed to market be mandated for all Virginia school children after the CDC recommends it for every child?
Because a law was passed in 2020 that allows state public health officials to automatically add every CDC recommended vaccine to the list of vaccines required for daycare and school entry—without public hearings or a vote by elected representatives in the legislature—it appears that the answer is “yes.”
Read the full article at TheVaccineReaction.org.
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.
References
1 § 32.1-46. Immunization of patients against certain diseases. Code of Virginia.
2 Fisher BL. Is a Bill Requiring Your Children to Get Every CDC Recommended Vaccination Coming to Your State? The Vaccine Reaction Jan. 17, 2020.
3 Virginia Department of Health. Virginia State Board of Health Membership Roster July 2018.
4 Sherlock JC. Virginia Board of Health & Infrastructure of Influence. Bacon’s Rebellion May 26, 2020.
5 NVIC Advocacy Portal.
6 HB 1090 Governor’s Recommendation.
7 Virginia General Assembly.
8 HB 1090 Immunizations; regulations by State Board of Health. Virginia’s Legislative Information System 2020 Session.
9 Cáceres M. A Vaccine for Coronavirus by Autumn? The Vaccine Reaction Apr. 2, 2020.
10 Elias S. A New Entry in the race for a Coronavirus Vaccine: Hope. The New York Times May 20, 2020.
11 Fisher BL. COVID-19 Meltdown and Pharma’s Big Money Win. The Vaccine Reaction Apr. 13, 2020.
12 Fisher BL, Parpia R. GSK and Sanofi COVID-19 Vaccine Produced in Insect Cells with Squalene Adjuvant. The Vaccine Reaction. May 4, 2020.
13 Vogel G. Why a pandemic flu shot caused narcolepsy. Science July 1, 2015.
14 Brown, C. H1N1 vaccine and narcolepsy link discovered. Canadian Medical Journal Association Sept. 8, 2015.
15 Sample I. Swine flu vaccine can trigger narcolepsy, UK government concedes. The Guardian Sept. 19, 2013.
See Also:
Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Book – The Vaccine Court “The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program” ORDER HERE!
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
Order here!
Make a Statement for Health Freedom!
Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children, and even adults.
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact, part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!


healthimpactnews--2020-06-17--Dr. Theresa Deisher on the use of Aborted Fetal Tissue in Vaccines: Babies are Born at 5-6 Months Ol

Dr. Theresa Deisher on the use of Aborted Fetal Tissue in Vaccines: Babies are Born at 5-6 Months Old Alive with Beating Hearts and No Anesthesia

This is a very important interview between Robert F. Kennedy , Jr. and Dr. Theresa Deisher regarding the use of human fetal tissue to culture viruses for vaccines , because Dr. Deisher reveals that human DNA fragments are found in vaccines .
Most of the COVID vaccines being developed are using human fetal tissue to culture the coronavirus .
One of the more interesting questions Mr. Kennedy asked Dr. Deisher was why the manufacturers of vaccines switched from exclusively using animal tissue to culture viruses for vaccines , to start using aborted fetal tissue some years back .
Dr. Deisher @ @ @ @ @ @ @ we getting a lot of pressure from the animal rights movement to stop using animals for experimentation .
They do .
And you know what ’ s really alarming is the lack of outcry over human babies born alive at five to six months old so that their hearts can be obtained beating .
And they have to be beating to be used in the research that ’ s being done .
If the heart has stopped beating , it ’ s not useful .
You can not use it .
And so @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their hearts cut out without anesthesia .
I wouldn ’ t do that to a mouse… .
On June 15th , Robert F. Kennedy , Jr. interviewed the founder and president of Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute , Dr. Theresa Deisher , on the use of aborted fetal tissue in vaccines .
Mr. Kennedy and Dr. Deisher covered a wide range of topics including which vaccines contain human fetal tissue , what the existing research tells us in terms of health risks , and what alternatives might be used in place of human DNA @ @ @ @ @ @ @ at VaccineImpact.com .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist ( kidney doctor ) , Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people .
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real , ethical medicine .
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines , no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children , and even adults .
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact , part of the Health Impact News network .

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
This is a very important interview between Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Dr. Theresa Deisher regarding the use of human fetal tissue to culture viruses for vaccines, because Dr. Deisher reveals that human DNA fragments are found in vaccines.
Most of the COVID vaccines being developed are using human fetal tissue to culture the coronavirus.
One of the more interesting questions Mr. Kennedy asked Dr. Deisher was why the manufacturers of vaccines switched from exclusively using animal tissue to culture viruses for vaccines, to start using aborted fetal tissue some years back.
Dr. Deisher’s reply was that the industry was getting a lot of pressure from the animal rights movement to stop using animals for experimentation.
Mr. Kennedy was shocked, and stated:
It’s kind of weird to think that the animal rights activists have more clout with the vaccine companies than do the anti-abortion activists.
Dr. Deisher replied:
They do. And you know what’s really alarming is the lack of outcry over human babies born alive at five to six months old so that their hearts can be obtained beating. And they have to be beating to be used in the research that’s being done. If the heart has stopped beating, it’s not useful. You cannot use it. And so these babies are delivered alive, and their hearts cut out without anesthesia. I wouldn’t do that to a mouse….
by Children’s Health Defense
On June 15th, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. interviewed the founder and president of Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute, Dr. Theresa Deisher, on the use of aborted fetal tissue in vaccines.
Mr. Kennedy and Dr. Deisher covered a wide range of topics including which vaccines contain human fetal tissue, what the existing research tells us in terms of health risks, and what alternatives might be used in place of human DNA in vaccines.
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.
Dr. Deisher is a genetic engineer with over 20 years experience in the pharmaceutical industry, from basic human biology through clinical trials.
Dr. Deisher obtained her Ph.D. in Molecular and Cellular Physiology from Stanford University and has spent over 20 years in commercial biotechnology. Prior to founding AVM Biotechnology and Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute (SCPI), she worked with leading biotechnology companies, including Genentech, Repligen, ZymoGenetics, Immunex and Amgen.
Dr. Deisher is an inventor on 23 issued U.S. patents, and her discoveries have led to clinical trials of FGF18 for osteoarthritis and cartilage repair, and for Factor XIII for surgical bleeding.
Dr. Deisher was the first person to discover adult cardiac derived stem cells, and has been a champion of adult stem cell research, both professionally and privately, for two decades.
Dr. Deisher was a plaintiff in the U.S. federal lawsuit to prohibit use of federal tax payer dollars for embryo destructive research, which was instrumental in steering science towards adult stem cell research, which has led to 14 U.S. FDA approved adult stem cell products and the Washington Post Dec 2013 headline “Scientists Go Ethical in 2013.”
AVM Biotechnology is the marquee prolife biotech company worldwide, certifying that it does not use morally illicit material in any process. SCPI’s mission is to end human trafficking in biomedical research.
See Also:
Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Book – The Vaccine Court “The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program” ORDER HERE!
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
Order here!
Make a Statement for Health Freedom!
Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children, and even adults.
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact, part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!


healthimpactnews--2020-06-17--Will American Christians Help Usher in the New World Order, or Resist It?

To answer the question posed in the title of this article : Will American Christians help usher in the New World Order , or resist it ?
– the most obvious answer based on recent history , is that there is no reason to believe that the Christian Church in America will resist it , but probably help usher it in .
I addressed some of the reasons why in a past article : Very few churches defied the lock down orders that were put in place earlier this year over the Coronavirus Plandemic .
There were a few exceptions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ paid the price , as an arsonist burned it to the ground as a warning to those who dare to defy the government ’ s orders .
In a few cases , pastors were arrested when they tried to keep their churches open .
With the country opening back up again in most states , the CDC has issued guidelines for churches and other faith-based organizations , which includes reporting church members who are sick to the local health authorities .
A woman who reports that she participated in a recent “ White @ @ @ @ @ @ @ states that Dr. Deborah Birx participated in the call to instruct these “ faith leaders ” how to conduct business in their places of worship , which allegedly included no singing , shorter sermons , staying home if possible , and encouraging the elderly and immune-compromised to get the COVID vaccine when it comes out .
Hearing her response to this in a Facebook Live recording this week , which is now going viral , gives one hope that maybe some Christians are beginning to wake up .
She stated that while Dr. @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , but everyone on the call was muted except for Dr. Birx .
Listen to her reaction to Dr. Birx and the CDC guidelines for churches : It was interesting to read the comments to this recording on Facebook , as several asked where President Trump and Vice President Pence were during this call .
It was reported that they were not participants of the “ White House prayer call for faith leaders ” this time , and therefore probably did not know about Dr. Birx ’ s comments .
How can one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , with millions out of work , thousands of small businesses going bankrupt while Wall Street profits , and the attacks on religious values , and still have faith in President Trump that he is going to save America ?
He is nearing the end of his first term , and does anyone seriously believe that this nation is better off now than before he took office ?
He continues to appoint people who are part of the Globalists connected to Bill Gates who are rushing to bring in the New World Order @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , the usual response is similar to the comments about him not being on this phone call : “ He must not know about this.
” He is the President of the United States !
How can he not know who these people are , and what they are doing ?
One Christian leader who does not look to President Trump as a savior for America is Chuck Baldwin .
He wrote this in a recent newsletter : I have tried to warn Christians and conservatives about Donald Trump ever since his election @ @ @ @ @ @ @ refused to listen , of course .
They truly do not want to hear the truth ; they much prefer to believe lies .
One reason for this is because ever since the administrations of Ronald Reagan and GW Bush , Christians and conservatives have traded faith in God and our Constitution for faith in Republican presidents .
The vast majority of them have placed their hope for the future in the Republican Party in general and in Republican presidents in particular—especially Donald Trump .
Therefore , they CAN NOT allow themselves to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ would destroy their faith .
Let me repeat that : It would destroy their FAITH .
It would leave them without hope .
No !
God and His eternal principles of Liberty and Peace are not enough .
That ’ s why Donald Trump can betray every constitutional principle on earth ; he can lie , cheat , steal and kill with impunity—and he can blaspheme virtually everything that is righteous , holy and good without losing the support of a single evangelical .
After almost 3 ½ years of Trump ’ s @ @ @ @ @ @ @ rhetoric , evangelicals are still in love with the man .
The worst they can say about him is , “ He ’ s getting bad advice.
” It ’ s never Trump ’ s fault .
This self-proclaimed genius , the greatest president in U.S. history , the smartest and most gifted man to ever occupy the Oval Office can not make a decision for himself .
No matter what he does , it ’ s always someone else ’ s fault .
Talk about cognitive dissonance !
These folks can not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the people HE WANTS advising him ; he listens to the people HE WANTS to listen to ; he does what HE WANTS to do ; and HE is accountable for every decision HE makes .
Passing-the-buck apologies are so much claptrap .
( Read the full newsletter here . )
The New World Order is Happening Fast – Who will Resist ?
As we have previously reported here at Health Impact News , the New World Order is no longer a “ conspiracy theory , ” but a well thought-out plan that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ world to see .
This is not a time to choose political sides .
The solutions to the problems now facing us are not political .
If you don ’ t know who the true enemy is , and who the true Savior is , you will be ill prepared to resist what is coming .
See our previous articles that expose the false narratives currently being published in the corporate media : The UN “ New World Order ” Has Now Been Published : No Longer a “ Conspiracy Theory ” – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to be Published : The “ Great Reset ” – Transhumanism and the 4th Industrial Revolution Unmasking Who is Behind the Plandemic and Rioting to Usher in the New World Order The Myth of Right vs. Left , Liberal vs. Conservative – Top 9 Myths Believed by BOTH Sides to Usher in a New World Order Dr. Judy Mikovits and Dr. Sherri Tenpenny : A New COVID Vaccine Could Kill 50 Million People in the U.S. Are There Enough Free-Thinking Americans Left to Resist the New World Order Take Over ?
Having problems @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
To answer the question posed in the title of this article: Will American Christians help usher in the New World Order, or resist it? – the most obvious answer based on recent history, is that there is no reason to believe that the Christian Church in America will resist it, but probably help usher it in.
I addressed some of the reasons why in a past article:
Very few churches defied the lock down orders that were put in place earlier this year over the Coronavirus Plandemic. There were a few exceptions, and one of them in Mississippi paid the price, as an arsonist burned it to the ground as a warning to those who dare to defy the government’s orders. In a few cases, pastors were arrested when they tried to keep their churches open.
With the country opening back up again in most states, the CDC has issued guidelines for churches and other faith-based organizations, which includes reporting church members who are sick to the local health authorities.
A woman who reports that she participated in a recent “White House prayer call for faith leaders” states that Dr. Deborah Birx participated in the call to instruct these “faith leaders” how to conduct business in their places of worship, which allegedly included no singing, shorter sermons, staying home if possible, and encouraging the elderly and immune-compromised to get the COVID vaccine when it comes out.
Hearing her response to this in a Facebook Live recording this week, which is now going viral, gives one hope that maybe some Christians are beginning to wake up. She stated that while Dr. Birx was talking, she became outraged, but everyone on the call was muted except for Dr. Birx.
Listen to her reaction to Dr. Birx and the CDC guidelines for churches:
The Christian Right’s Adoration with President Trump
It was interesting to read the comments to this recording on Facebook, as several asked where President Trump and Vice President Pence were during this call.
It was reported that they were not participants of the “White House prayer call for faith leaders” this time, and therefore probably did not know about Dr. Birx’s comments.
Really?
How can one watch the near total destruction of America, with millions out of work, thousands of small businesses going bankrupt while Wall Street profits, and the attacks on religious values, and still have faith in President Trump that he is going to save America? He is nearing the end of his first term, and does anyone seriously believe that this nation is better off now than before he took office?
He continues to appoint people who are part of the Globalists connected to Bill Gates who are rushing to bring in the New World Order, and when discussing this with Christians, the usual response is similar to the comments about him not being on this phone call: “He must not know about this.”
He is the President of the United States! How can he not know who these people are, and what they are doing?
One Christian leader who does not look to President Trump as a savior for America is Chuck Baldwin. He wrote this in a recent newsletter:
I have tried to warn Christians and conservatives about Donald Trump ever since his election. The vast majority of them have refused to listen, of course. They truly do not want to hear the truth; they much prefer to believe lies. One reason for this is because ever since the administrations of Ronald Reagan and GW Bush, Christians and conservatives have traded faith in God and our Constitution for faith in Republican presidents. The vast majority of them have placed their hope for the future in the Republican Party in general and in Republican presidents in particular—especially Donald Trump. Therefore, they CANNOT allow themselves to believe the truth about Trump. It would destroy their faith. Let me repeat that: It would destroy their FAITH. It would leave them without hope. No! God and His eternal principles of Liberty and Peace are not enough. That’s why Donald Trump can betray every constitutional principle on earth; he can lie, cheat, steal and kill with impunity—and he can blaspheme virtually everything that is righteous, holy and good without losing the support of a single evangelical. After almost 3 ½ years of Trump’s disingenuousness, degradation, duplicity and double-tongued rhetoric, evangelicals are still in love with the man. The worst they can say about him is, “He’s getting bad advice.” It’s never Trump’s fault. This self-proclaimed genius, the greatest president in U.S. history, the smartest and most gifted man to ever occupy the Oval Office cannot make a decision for himself. No matter what he does, it’s always someone else’s fault. Talk about cognitive dissonance! These folks cannot admit to themselves that Donald Trump picks the people HE WANTS advising him; he listens to the people HE WANTS to listen to; he does what HE WANTS to do; and HE is accountable for every decision HE makes. Passing-the-buck apologies are so much claptrap. (Read the full newsletter here.)
The New World Order is Happening Fast – Who will Resist?
As we have previously reported here at Health Impact News, the New World Order is no longer a “conspiracy theory,” but a well thought-out plan that has now been published for the whole world to see.
This is not a time to choose political sides. The solutions to the problems now facing us are not political.
If you don’t know who the true enemy is, and who the true Savior is, you will be ill prepared to resist what is coming. See our previous articles that expose the false narratives currently being published in the corporate media:
See Also: