healthimpactnews--2020-11-13--The “Great Reset” Includes Human Diet: GMO Lab “Meat” to Replace Animal Meat

The World Economic Forum ’ s ( WEF ) The Great Reset includes a plan to transform the global food and agricultural industries and the human diet .
The architects of the plan claim it will reduce food scarcity , hunger and disease , and even mitigate climate change .
But a closer look at the corporations and think tanks the WEF is partnering with to usher in this global transformation suggests that the real motive is tighter corporate control over the food system by means of technological solutions .
Vandana Shiva , scholar , environmentalist , food sovereignty advocate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ “ The Great Reset is about multinational corporate stakeholders at the World Economic Forum controlling as many elements of planetary life as they possibly can .
From the digital data humans produce to each morsel of food we eat.
” The WEF describes itself as “ the global platform for public-private cooperation ” that creates partnerships between corporations , politicians , intellectuals , scientists and other leaders of society to “ define , discuss and advance key issues on the global agenda.
” According to WEF ’ s founder and executive chairman , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ by the goal of positioning “ private corporations as the trustees of society ” to “ address social and environmental challenges.
” In July , Schwab published a 195-page book , “ COVID-19 : The Great Reset , ” in which he challenged industry leaders and decision makers to “ make good use of the pandemic by not letting the crisis go to waste.
” TIME magazine ( whose owner Marc Benioff is a WEF board member ) recently partnered with the WEF to cover The Great Reset and to provide a “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a unique opportunity to transform the way we live.
” The Great Reset is meant to be all-encompassing .
Its partner organizations include the biggest players in data collection , telecommunications , weapons manufacturing , finance , pharmaceuticals , biotechnology and the food industry .
The WEF ’ s plans for the “ reset ” of food and agriculture include projects and strategic partnerships that favor genetically modified organisms , lab-made proteins and pharmaceuticals and industrial chemicals as sustainable solutions to food and health issues .
For example , WEF has promoted and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
EAT Forum describes itself as a “ Davos for food ” that plans to “ add value to business and industry ” and “ set the political agenda.
” EAT was co-founded by Wellcome Trust , an organization established with funds from GlaxoSmithKline and which still has strategic partnerships with the drugmaker .
EAT collaborates with nearly 40 city governments in Europe , Africa , Asia , North America , South America and Australia .
The organization also assists the United Nations Children ’ s Fund ( UNICEF ) in the “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sustainable development initiatives .
According to Federic Leroy , a food science and biotechnology professor at University of Brussels , EAT network interacts closely with some of the biggest imitation meat companies , including Impossible Foods and other biotech companies , which aim to replace wholesome nutritious foods with genetically modified lab creations .
“ They frame it as healthy and sustainable , which of course it is neither , ” Leroy told The Defender .
Impossible Foods was initially co-funded by Google , Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates .
Recent lab results @ @ @ @ @ @ @ contained glyphosate levels 11 times higher than its closest competitor .
EAT ’ s biggest initiative is called FReSH , which the organization describes as an effort to drive the transformation of the food system .
The project ’ s partners include Bayer , Cargill , Syngenta , Unilever and even tech giant Google .
“ Companies like Unilever and Bayer and other pharmaceutical companies are already chemical processors — so many of these companies are very well positioned to profit off of this new food business which revolves around processing chemicals and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on a global scale , ” Leroy said .
In Schwab ’ s book , he discusses how biotechnology and genetically modified food should become a central pillar to repairing global food scarcity issues , issues which COVID has revealed and exacerbated .
He writes “ global food security will only be achieved if regulations on genetically modified foods are adapted to reflect the reality that gene editing offers a precise , efficient and safe method of improving crops.
” Shiva disagrees .
She told The Defender that the “ WEF is parading @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Mr. Schwab to promote these technologies as solutions proves that The Great Reset is about maintaining and empowering a corporate extraction machine and the private ownership of life.
” EAT developed what it refers to as “ the planetary health diet , ” which the WEF champions as the “ sustainable dietary solution of the future.
” But according to Leroy , it ’ s a diet that ’ s supposed to replace everything else .
“ The diet aims to cut the meat and dairy intake of the global population by as @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and replaces it with lab-made foods , cereals and oil , ” he said .
Shiva further explained , “ EAT ’ s proposed diet is not about nutrition at all , it ’ s about big business and it ’ s about a corporate takeover of the food system.
” According to EAT ’ s own reports , the big adjustments the organization and its corporate partners want to make to the food system are “ unlikely to be successful if left up to the individual , ” and the changes they @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and food “ require reframing at the systemic level with hard policy interventions that include laws , fiscal measures , subsidies and penalties , trade reconfiguration and other economic and structural measures.
” But Shiva said this is the wrong approach , because “ all of the science ” shows that diets should be centered around regional and geographical biodiversity .
She explained that “ EAT ’ s uniform global diet will be produced with western technology and agricultural chemicals .
Forcing this onto sovereign nations by multinational lobbying is what I refer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Great Reset ” Will You Choose ?

by Jeremy Loffredo
Children’s Health Defense
The World Economic Forum’s (WEF) The Great Reset includes a plan to transform the global food and agricultural industries and the human diet. The architects of the plan claim it will reduce food scarcity, hunger and disease, and even mitigate climate change.
But a closer look at the corporations and think tanks the WEF is partnering with to usher in this global transformation suggests that the real motive is tighter corporate control over the food system by means of technological solutions.
Vandana Shiva, scholar, environmentalist, food sovereignty advocate and author, told The Defender, “The Great Reset is about multinational corporate stakeholders at the World Economic Forum controlling as many elements of planetary life as they possibly can. From the digital data humans produce to each morsel of food we eat.”
The WEF describes itself as “the global platform for public-private cooperation” that creates partnerships between corporations, politicians, intellectuals, scientists and other leaders of society to “define, discuss and advance key issues on the global agenda.”
According to WEF’s founder and executive chairman, Klaus Schwab, the forum is guided by the goal of positioning “private corporations as the trustees of society” to “address social and environmental challenges.”
In July, Schwab published a 195-page book, “COVID-19: The Great Reset,” in which he challenged industry leaders and decision makers to “make good use of the pandemic by not letting the crisis go to waste.”
TIME magazine (whose owner Marc Benioff is a WEF board member) recently partnered with the WEF to cover The Great Reset and to provide a “look at how the COVID-19 pandemic provides a unique opportunity to transform the way we live.”
The Great Reset is meant to be all-encompassing. Its partner organizations include the biggest players in data collection, telecommunications, weapons manufacturing, finance, pharmaceuticals, biotechnology and the food industry.
The WEF’s plans for the “reset” of food and agriculture include projects and strategic partnerships that favor genetically modified organisms, lab-made proteins and pharmaceuticals and industrial chemicals as sustainable solutions to food and health issues.
For example, WEF has promoted and partnered with an organization called EAT Forum. EAT Forum describes itself as a “Davos for food” that plans to “add value to business and industry” and “set the political agenda.”
EAT was co-founded by Wellcome Trust, an organization established with funds from GlaxoSmithKline and which still has strategic partnerships with the drugmaker. EAT collaborates with nearly 40 city governments in Europe, Africa, Asia, North America, South America and Australia. The organization also assists the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) in the “creation of new dietary guidelines” and sustainable development initiatives.
According to Federic Leroy, a food science and biotechnology professor at University of Brussels, EAT network interacts closely with some of the biggest imitation meat companies, including Impossible Foods and other biotech companies, which aim to replace wholesome nutritious foods with genetically modified lab creations.
“They frame it as healthy and sustainable, which of course it is neither,” Leroy told The Defender.
Impossible Foods was initially co-funded by Google, Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates. Recent lab results showed the company’s imitation meat contained glyphosate levels 11 times higher than its closest competitor.
EAT’s biggest initiative is called FReSH, which the organization describes as an effort to drive the transformation of the food system. The project’s partners include Bayer, Cargill, Syngenta, Unilever and even tech giant Google.
“Companies like Unilever and Bayer and other pharmaceutical companies are already chemical processors — so many of these companies are very well positioned to profit off of this new food business which revolves around processing chemicals and extracts needed to produce these lab-made foods on a global scale,” Leroy said.
In Schwab’s book, he discusses how biotechnology and genetically modified food should become a central pillar to repairing global food scarcity issues, issues which COVID has revealed and exacerbated.
He writes “global food security will only be achieved if regulations on genetically modified foods are adapted to reflect the reality that gene editing offers a precise, efficient and safe method of improving crops.”
Shiva disagrees. She told The Defender that the “WEF is parading fake science,” and “for Mr. Schwab to promote these technologies as solutions proves that The Great Reset is about maintaining and empowering a corporate extraction machine and the private ownership of life.”
EAT developed what it refers to as “the planetary health diet,” which the WEF champions as the “sustainable dietary solution of the future.” But according to Leroy, it’s a diet that’s supposed to replace everything else. “The diet aims to cut the meat and dairy intake of the global population by as much as 90% in some cases and replaces it with lab-made foods, cereals and oil,” he said.
Shiva further explained, “EAT’s proposed diet is not about nutrition at all, it’s about big business and it’s about a corporate takeover of the food system.”
According to EAT’s own reports, the big adjustments the organization and its corporate partners want to make to the food system are “unlikely to be successful if left up to the individual,” and the changes they wish to impose on societal eating habits and food “require reframing at the systemic level with hard policy interventions that include laws, fiscal measures, subsidies and penalties, trade reconfiguration and other economic and structural measures.”
But Shiva said this is the wrong approach, because “all of the science” shows that diets should be centered around regional and geographical biodiversity. She explained that “EAT’s uniform global diet will be produced with western technology and agricultural chemicals. Forcing this onto sovereign nations by multinational lobbying is what I refer to as food imperialism.”
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-11-12--FDA Declares Homeopathic Medicine Illegal – Advocacy Group Seeks 100,000 Protest Comments

Help us support our allies in an effort to stop the FDA ’ s attack on this safe , natural form of medicine .
Action Alert !
Our friends at Americans for Homeopathy Choice have submitted a Citizens Petition to the FDA requesting that the agency reverse its recent actions with regard to homeopathic medicine .
Upending decades of safe regulation , in 2018 the FDA released a draft guidance that essentially stated that all homeopathic drugs are illegal .
We can not let this attack against this safe and effective form of medicine go unchecked .
Recall that the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ lays out the agency ’ s current position on the regulation of homeopathic drugs , says : • Any homeopathic drug that has not been considered “ generally recognized as safe and effective ” ( GRAS/E ) is considered a new drug ; • FDA has not determined that any homeopathic drugs are GRAS/E ; • A new drug can not be marketed unless it goes through the FDA ’ s approval process ; • No homeopathic drugs have gone through FDA approval nor can any producer afford to take them through the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that , while all homeopathic drugs are illegal , the FDA will apply a risk-based enforcement approach .
The agency has already begun to apply this doctrine ; earlier this year the agency attacked manufacturers of injectable homeopathic medicines .
In our coverage of this recent attack , we pointed out that there is in fact no safety issue with homeopathic medicines , which have a sterling record of safety .
A review of the evidence of adverse events related to homeopathy , which included data from 12 European countries , the US @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Brazil published between 1978 and 2010 , found a total of just 1,159 adverse events .
This equates to an average of just over 50 cases per annum across all 17 countries from which studies were conducted .
By comparison , foodborne illness contributes to on average of 128,000 hospitalizations and 3,000 deaths annually in the US alone .
Worldwide , an estimated 200 million people use homeopathy regularly , including 6 million in the United States .
These data show that adverse events from homeopathic medicines occur at a very , very @ @ @ @ @ @ @ homeopathic medicines ?
The FDA gets a large part of its funding from drug company user fees , and for this reason sees Big Pharma as its client .
Homeopathic medicines , like supplements and other natural products , compete with pharmaceutical drugs , so the FDA uses its enormous power to tilt the scales in favor of the drug companies .
And because natural products and homeopathic medicines generally can not be patent-protected like drugs can , they can ’ t afford FDA-approval and so can not make disease claims .
It @ @ @ @ @ @ @ undermining healthcare in this country .
Sign our petition below to reform American healthcare .
In addition , go to Americans for Homeopathy Choice ’ s website to submit a comment in support of their Citizens Petition .
Action Alert !
Sign our petition to reform our healthcare system that bars and undermines natural options like homeopathic medicine .
Please sign our petition immediately .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

Help Us Save Homeopathy!
by Alliance for Natural Health
Help us support our allies in an effort to stop the FDA’s attack on this safe, natural form of medicine. Action Alert!
Our friends at Americans for Homeopathy Choice have submitted a Citizens Petition to the FDA requesting that the agency reverse its recent actions with regard to homeopathic medicine.
Upending decades of safe regulation, in 2018 the FDA released a draft guidance that essentially stated that all homeopathic drugs are illegal.
We cannot let this attack against this safe and effective form of medicine go unchecked.
Recall that the FDA’s guidance document, which lays out the agency’s current position on the regulation of homeopathic drugs, says:
Any homeopathic drug that has not been considered “generally recognized as safe and effective” (GRAS/E) is considered a new drug; FDA has not determined that any homeopathic drugs are GRAS/E; A new drug cannot be marketed unless it goes through the FDA’s approval process; No homeopathic drugs have gone through FDA approval nor can any producer afford to take them through the approval process.
The guidance also explains that, while all homeopathic drugs are illegal, the FDA will apply a risk-based enforcement approach.
The agency has already begun to apply this doctrine; earlier this year the agency attacked manufacturers of injectable homeopathic medicines.
In our coverage of this recent attack, we pointed out that there is in fact no safety issue with homeopathic medicines, which have a sterling record of safety.
A review of the evidence of adverse events related to homeopathy, which included data from 12 European countries, the US, Mexico, India, Israel and Brazil published between 1978 and 2010, found a total of just 1,159 adverse events.
This equates to an average of just over 50 cases per annum across all 17 countries from which studies were conducted. By comparison, foodborne illness contributes to on average of 128,000 hospitalizations and 3,000 deaths annually in the US alone.
Worldwide, an estimated 200 million people use homeopathy regularly, including 6 million in the United States. These data show that adverse events from homeopathic medicines occur at a very, very low rate.
So why go after homeopathic medicines?
The FDA gets a large part of its funding from drug company user fees, and for this reason sees Big Pharma as its client. Homeopathic medicines, like supplements and other natural products, compete with pharmaceutical drugs, so the FDA uses its enormous power to tilt the scales in favor of the drug companies.
And because natural products and homeopathic medicines generally cannot be patent-protected like drugs can, they can’t afford FDA-approval and so cannot make disease claims. It is one of many ways cronyism is undermining healthcare in this country.
Sign our petition below to reform American healthcare. In addition, go to Americans for Homeopathy Choice’s website to submit a comment in support of their Citizens Petition.
Action Alert! Sign our petition to reform our healthcare system that bars and undermines natural options like homeopathic medicine. Please sign our petition immediately.
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-11-13--How They Will Make the COVID Vaccine Appear to be Working

How they ’ ll fake the success of the COVID vaccine I ’ ve described how the major clinical trials of the COVID vaccine are designed to prevent nothing more than a cough , or chills and fever [ 1 ] [ 2 ] .
The whole plan to gain FDA approval of the vaccine is a stark fraud .
Now let ’ s move on to the next con : how to make it seem the vaccine is a roaring success .
Brief background : My readers know I ’ ve presented a complete case to show the SARS-CoV-2 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the first place [ 3 ] [ 4 ] [ 5 ] [ 6 ] [ 7 ] [ 8 ] [ 9 ] [ 10 ] .
So the whole idea of a vaccine is a non-sequitur , an absurdity .
Likewise , the PCR test for “ the virus ” is a fraud on several levels [ 11 ] : For example , the number of “ cycles ” for which the test is set is a key factor .
Each cycle is a huge amplification of the tissue sample taken @ @ @ @ @ @ @ up that tissue sample above 34 cycles , you get gigantic numbers of false-positive results , even by the standards of the test .
Fauci has admitted it .
I ’ ve pointed out that FDA guidelines nevertheless recommend doing the test at up to 40 cycles .
This alone explains reports of “ rising COVID case numbers.
” Let ’ s say Pfizer and then Moderna win FDA approval to release their vaccines in the US .
With the military doing the logistics of shipping , millions of doses move out , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Americans are lining up to take the shot .
After a suitable period of time , the elite medical planners will change the way the PCR test is done .
The number of cycles will be drastically reduced .
That order will go out to labs in the US .
What does this mean ?
It means that far fewer positive test results will occur .
Therefore , the trend of “ new COVID cases ” will stop rising .
It will level off , and then it will fall .
This rigging @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine is producing a victory over the virus .
There is another strategy : change the definition of “ a case of COVID.
” Make the new definition , in terms of clinical symptoms , more restrictive .
Something like this would do the trick : “ The patient must exhibit a body temperature of at least 100 for 48 consecutive hours.
” That will automatically cause a significant drop in the number of cases .
The drop will be attributed to the salutary effect of the vaccine .
For purposes of lockdowns @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to promote more fear and punish areas where the economy is “ too open , ” a reverse-technique can be applied : Make PCR tests adjust their cycles UPWARD , thus producing huge numbers of positive results and “ new cases.
” “ Well , in South Dakota , we have to mandate at least 100,000 more vaccinations in each of the following ‘ hot spots , ’ where case numbers have suddenly escalated .
And we must lock down those areas immediately… ” Needless to say , any and all serious harm @ @ @ @ @ @ @ will be attributed to “ the pandemic disease.
” And there you have it .
Simple , brutal , criminal , and controlled from the federal level .
A strategy for making it seem the COVID vaccine is effective , and saved the day .
Here is a backgrounder I wrote on the subject of COVID vaccine fraud : Making a vaccine look like it ’ s a champion isn ’ t difficult for public health agencies .
There are a number of strategies .
Of course , these fraudulent strategies would be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ stopped the CDC or the World Health Organization ?
In no particular order—- ONE : Rework the definition of a “ COVID case.
” Presently , the CDC absurdly allows doctors to diagnose a person with COVID who has a cough , or chills and fever , and lives in an area where cases are being claimed .
No test necessary .
So change this practice , once the vaccine is approved .
Demand testing for a diagnosis .
State that cough alone is not enough .
Chills and fever must also be @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 100 .
These and other changes would automatically shrink the number of cases .
The drop in numbers would be attributed to the vaccine .
This “ definitional shrinking ” was , in fact , deployed in the 1950s , after the introduction of the polio vaccine .
TWO : Order a change in the way the PCR diagnostic test is done .
The practice of amplifying the original test sample from the patient occurs in cycles , or jumps .
The greater the number of cycles , the more likely the test @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Therefore , order a reduced number of cycles for all testing labs .
THREE : Quietly restrict the present hospital practice of arbitrarily writing “ COVID ” on patient case and death files .
FOUR : Cook up and publish false studies showing more and more people are developing immunity to the virus .
Attribute this to the vaccine .
FIVE : Another type of false study— “ the transmission of the virus from person to person is slowing , thanks to the vaccine.
” SIX : Pump up the success of issuing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are feeling safer now .
More businesses are reopening… ” SEVEN : Using the compliant press , simply issue bald declarations that the vaccine is a success .
EIGHT : Hide the many instances of injury and death from the vaccine .
When necessary , claim COVID was the cause .
NINE : Warn that the wonderful vaccine-derived immunity is not permanent , and frequent booster shots are necessary .
TEN : Rework the definition of “ vaccine-acquired immunity.
” Even a very weak antibody response from the shot would qualify as “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of people with ordinary flu-like illness , pneumonia , and other traditional lung infections are being called “ COVID.
” Change this practice .
Go back to calling many of these people “ flu , ” “ pneumonia , ” etc .
COVID case numbers will drop .
Claim the drop is the effect of the vaccine .
TWELVE : Presently , millions of so-called COVID cases have “ co-morbidities.
” These are prior serious health conditions which are , in fact , the true causes of illnesses and death .
Of course @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the vaccine is introduced… scale back the practice of counting all these ill and deceased co-morbid patients as “ COVID.
” Case and death numbers will drop .
Claim the vaccine is the reason .
THIRTEEN : After the vaccine is introduced , slow down testing for a brief period .
This will automatically reduce the rate of new cases .
Attribute the decline to the vaccine .
Committing these crimes are a walk in the park for public health agencies .
And appointing official mouthpieces to carry lies to the public is @ @ @ @ @ @ @ sit up and bark .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

How they’ll fake the success of the COVID vaccine
by Jon Rappoport
nomorefakenews.com
I’ve described how the major clinical trials of the COVID vaccine are designed to prevent nothing more than a cough, or chills and fever [1] [2].
The whole plan to gain FDA approval of the vaccine is a stark fraud.
Now let’s move on to the next con: how to make it seem the vaccine is a roaring success.
Brief background: My readers know I’ve presented a complete case to show the SARS-CoV-2 virus was never proved to exist in the first place [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]. So the whole idea of a vaccine is a non-sequitur, an absurdity. Likewise, the PCR test for “the virus” is a fraud on several levels [11]:
For example, the number of “cycles” for which the test is set is a key factor. Each cycle is a huge amplification of the tissue sample taken from the patient.
When you blow up that tissue sample above 34 cycles, you get gigantic numbers of false-positive results, even by the standards of the test. Fauci has admitted it. I’ve pointed out that FDA guidelines nevertheless recommend doing the test at up to 40 cycles. This alone explains reports of “rising COVID case numbers.”
Let’s say Pfizer and then Moderna win FDA approval to release their vaccines in the US. With the military doing the logistics of shipping, millions of doses move out, and soon, an extraordinary number of Americans are lining up to take the shot.
After a suitable period of time, the elite medical planners will change the way the PCR test is done. The number of cycles will be drastically reduced. That order will go out to labs in the US.
What does this mean? It means that far fewer positive test results will occur.
Therefore, the trend of “new COVID cases” will stop rising. It will level off, and then it will fall.
This rigging will be heralded as proof that that vaccine is producing a victory over the virus.
There is another strategy: change the definition of “a case of COVID.” Make the new definition, in terms of clinical symptoms, more restrictive. Something like this would do the trick: “The patient must exhibit a body temperature of at least 100 for 48 consecutive hours.”
That will automatically cause a significant drop in the number of cases. The drop will be attributed to the salutary effect of the vaccine.
For purposes of lockdowns and general clampdowns [12], to promote more fear and punish areas where the economy is “too open,” a reverse-technique can be applied:
Make PCR tests adjust their cycles UPWARD, thus producing huge numbers of positive results and “new cases.”
“Well, in South Dakota, we have to mandate at least 100,000 more vaccinations in each of the following ‘hot spots,’ where case numbers have suddenly escalated. And we must lock down those areas immediately…”
Needless to say, any and all serious harm and death caused by the vaccine anywhere will be attributed to “the pandemic disease.”
And there you have it. Simple, brutal, criminal, and controlled from the federal level. A strategy for making it seem the COVID vaccine is effective, and saved the day.
Here is a backgrounder I wrote on the subject of COVID vaccine fraud:
Making a vaccine look like it’s a champion isn’t difficult for public health agencies. There are a number of strategies.
Of course, these fraudulent strategies would be serious crimes. But when has that stopped the CDC or the World Health Organization?
In no particular order—-
ONE: Rework the definition of a “COVID case.” Presently, the CDC absurdly allows doctors to diagnose a person with COVID who has a cough, or chills and fever, and lives in an area where cases are being claimed. No test necessary.
So change this practice, once the vaccine is approved. Demand testing for a diagnosis. State that cough alone is not enough. Chills and fever must also be present. Require fever to be above 100.
These and other changes would automatically shrink the number of cases. The drop in numbers would be attributed to the vaccine.
This “definitional shrinking” was, in fact, deployed in the 1950s, after the introduction of the polio vaccine.
TWO: Order a change in the way the PCR diagnostic test is done. The practice of amplifying the original test sample from the patient occurs in cycles, or jumps. The greater the number of cycles, the more likely the test will result in a COVID diagnosis. Therefore, order a reduced number of cycles for all testing labs.
Outcome? Fewer COVID diagnoses. Fewer case numbers. “The vaccine is working.”
THREE: Quietly restrict the present hospital practice of arbitrarily writing “COVID” on patient case and death files.
FOUR: Cook up and publish false studies showing more and more people are developing immunity to the virus. Attribute this to the vaccine.
FIVE: Another type of false study—“the transmission of the virus from person to person is slowing, thanks to the vaccine.”
SIX: Pump up the success of issuing Immunity certificates after vaccination. “People are feeling safer now. More businesses are reopening…”
SEVEN: Using the compliant press, simply issue bald declarations that the vaccine is a success.
EIGHT: Hide the many instances of injury and death from the vaccine. When necessary, claim COVID was the cause.
NINE: Warn that the wonderful vaccine-derived immunity is not permanent, and frequent booster shots are necessary.
TEN: Rework the definition of “vaccine-acquired immunity.” Even a very weak antibody response from the shot would qualify as “protective immunity.”
ELEVEN: Huge numbers of people with ordinary flu-like illness, pneumonia, and other traditional lung infections are being called “COVID.” Change this practice. Go back to calling many of these people “flu,” “pneumonia,” etc. COVID case numbers will drop. Claim the drop is the effect of the vaccine.
TWELVE: Presently, millions of so-called COVID cases have “co-morbidities.” These are prior serious health conditions which are, in fact, the true causes of illnesses and death. Of course, this is denied. But after the vaccine is introduced… scale back the practice of counting all these ill and deceased co-morbid patients as “COVID.” Case and death numbers will drop. Claim the vaccine is the reason.
THIRTEEN: After the vaccine is introduced, slow down testing for a brief period. This will automatically reduce the rate of new cases. Attribute the decline to the vaccine.
Committing these crimes are a walk in the park for public health agencies.
And appointing official mouthpieces to carry lies to the public is as easy as training little Faucis to sit up and bark.
Read the full article at nomorefakenews.com.
SOURCES:
[1] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/11/11/covid-vaccine-revelation-sinks-like-a-stone-disappears/
[2] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/09/24/covid-vaccine-clinical-trials-doomed-to-fail-fatal-design-flaw/
~
[3] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/08/the-smoking-gun-where-is-the-coronavirus-the-cdc-says-it-isnt-available/
[4] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/09/covid-the-virus-that-isnt-there-the-root-fraud-exposed/
[5] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/12/the-fake-coronavirus-and-the-missing-study-the-secret-in-plain-sight/
[6] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/13/yet-another-case-of-the-missing-virus-they-lied-and-locked-down-the-world/
[7] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/15/if-the-virus-isnt-there-why-do-they-believe-it-is/
[8] http://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/19/dr-tom-cowan-explores-the-covid-virus-invented-out-of-sheer-nonsense/
[9] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/22/the-virus-that-isnt-there-genetic-sequencing-and-the-magic-trick/
[10] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/26/the-missing-virus-answering-critics-objections/
~
[11] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/11/06/smoking-gun-fauci-states-covid-test-has-fatal-flaw/
[12] https://www.rt.com/usa/506308-biden-covid19-advisor-lockdown/
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-11-15--As Millions Face Eviction and Starvation, Pentagon to Spend Nearly $2 Billion a Day on War

According to an analysis from Feeding America , food insecurity will hit 52 million people due to COVID-19 in the United States , which is an increase of 17 million people from pre-pandemic times .
Supply line disruptions , lower levels of donations , and millions of unemployed people who ’ ve lost their jobs due to government-imposed lockdowns have created a massive strain on America ’ s food supply and more and more family ’ s are being pushed into a situation of food insecurity .
It ’ s not just the brink of starvation that millions of Americans @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , a record number of Americans are unable to find jobs as businesses are forced to close or have gone out of business permanently .
This is creating a situation in which families are unable to pay their rent — leading to the potential for mass evictions .
In March the CARES Act imposed a federal moratorium on evictions , which mandated that it was illegal to evict tenants who participate in federal housing assistance programs or who live in properties with a federally backed mortgage loan due to the nonpayment of rent @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on July 24 , a host of state and local governments passed their own eviction prevention measures—but these actions varied significantly across the country and left many renters vulnerable to eviction once again .
Then , on September 4 , the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued another moratorium on evictions through December 31 , 2020 .
While this will certainly help those who rent — temporarily — all the moratorium did was pass the burden onto the landlord who may no longer be able to pay the mortgage on the property @ @ @ @ @ @ @ s not just the brink of starvation that millions of Americans face either .
Thanks to government-mandated lockdowns , a record number of Americans are unable to find jobs as businesses are forced to close or have gone out of business permanently .
This is creating a situation in which families are unable to pay their rent — leading to the potential for mass evictions .
In March the CARES Act imposed a federal moratorium on evictions , which mandated that it was illegal to evict tenants who participate in federal housing assistance @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a federally backed mortgage loan due to the nonpayment of rent .
When the CARES Act moratorium expired on July 24 , a host of state and local governments passed their own eviction prevention measures—but these actions varied significantly across the country and left many renters vulnerable to eviction once again .
Then , on September 4 , the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued another moratorium on evictions through December 31 , 2020 .
While this will certainly help those who rent — temporarily — all the moratorium did was pass @ @ @ @ @ @ @ no longer be able to pay the mortgage on the property without the incoming rent .
And no , contrary to what many believe , most landlords are not mega rich property owners and live modest lifestyles .
In fact , according to an analysis by the Brookings Institute 40 percent of residential property units are owned by individual investor landlords .
Among those owning residential investment property , roughly a third are from low- to moderate-income households ; property income constitutes up to 20 percent of their total household income .
Now @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the burden placed on smaller landlords another massive crisis is unfolding .
To understand why this crisis is unfolding it needs to be made clear that a moratorium doesn ’ t forgive rent payments , it only allows the renter to defer them .
However , if a tenant can not come up with monthly rent right now , the idea of paying back multiple months of compounded rent after the moratorium is over , will be all but impossible .
This lack of income will then be passed to the small business @ @ @ @ @ @ @ loan payments and these houses will be repossessed by the banks .
Given that the majority of rental homes are owned by individual “ mom and pop ” operations — not massive real estate companies — the resultant defaults could be catastrophic .
Bank owned homes will likely not be subject to a moratorium and the occupants will be thrown out on the street .
One would think that the government would be paying attention to these food and housing crises and take action to prevent the inevitable collapse that will ensue with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ action would come in the form of rental assistance or other relief packages that could prevent such a devastating chain reaction of default and subsequent eviction .
Unfortunately , however , government is gon na do what government is gon na do and it has taken no action to prevent the inevitable chaos .
Instead of passing relief packages to help the American citizens who have been forced out of work by governors across the country , partisan politicians have acted like children , refusing to reach a compromise on how that relief @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to childish bickering in a school yard but it will affect millions .
In the meantime , however , as the left and the right ignore the mass suffering of their constituents and ensure a massive economic collapse in the near future , they have and always will agree on one thing — war .
Both Republicans and Democrats in the House passed a $ 694.6 billion version of the Pentagon spending bill in July for fiscal year 2021 .
Nearly three quarters of a trillion dollars will go to furthering the militaristic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ next year as part of this package .
The Senate proposed the final version of this Pentagon spending bill this week and the total $ 1.4 trillion package will likely be approved with little resistance .
The fact that people still believe in the idea that government has our best interests in mind is mind blowing .
They do not .
Despite claiming to care in public , both parties ignore the plight of their citizens and grant billions in contracts to weapons manufacturers and foreign governments along the way — all to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ side of the planet to keep their corporate masters appeased .
This should be expected though as it is the power of the two party paradigm .
Partisan divide keeps people from seeing the reality that is the military industrial complex and the cancer it has become on this planet .
The left and the right constantly argue over irrelevant talking points as the police and warfare state marches on .
The $ 27 trillion in debt is irrelevant to most people and the fact that millions of Americans are going hungry and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ off as the fault of the “ other party ” that their party tells them to hate .
This is the state of the land of the free in 2020 .
Rest assured , if nothing radical changes , what little freedom is left in this country , will dissipate before we know it .
And , most Americans will have become so dependent on the state by that time , they will gladly accept it .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your @ @

by Matt Agorist
Thefreethoughtproject.com
According to an analysis from Feeding America, food insecurity will hit 52 million people due to COVID-19 in the United States, which is an increase of 17 million people from pre-pandemic times.
Supply line disruptions, lower levels of donations, and millions of unemployed people who’ve lost their jobs due to government-imposed lockdowns have created a massive strain on America’s food supply and more and more family’s are being pushed into a situation of food insecurity.
It’s not just the brink of starvation that millions of Americans face either. Thanks to government-mandated lockdowns, a record number of Americans are unable to find jobs as businesses are forced to close or have gone out of business permanently. This is creating a situation in which families are unable to pay their rent — leading to the potential for mass evictions.
In March the CARES Act imposed a federal moratorium on evictions, which mandated that it was illegal to evict tenants who participate in federal housing assistance programs or who live in properties with a federally backed mortgage loan due to the nonpayment of rent. When the CARES Act moratorium expired on July 24, a host of state and local governments passed their own eviction prevention measures—but these actions varied significantly across the country and left many renters vulnerable to eviction once again.
Then, on September 4, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued another moratorium on evictions through December 31, 2020. While this will certainly help those who rent — temporarily — all the moratorium did was pass the burden onto the landlord who may no longer be able to pay the mortgage on the property without the incoming rent.
It’s not just the brink of starvation that millions of Americans face either. Thanks to government-mandated lockdowns, a record number of Americans are unable to find jobs as businesses are forced to close or have gone out of business permanently. This is creating a situation in which families are unable to pay their rent — leading to the potential for mass evictions.
In March the CARES Act imposed a federal moratorium on evictions, which mandated that it was illegal to evict tenants who participate in federal housing assistance programs or who live in properties with a federally backed mortgage loan due to the nonpayment of rent. When the CARES Act moratorium expired on July 24, a host of state and local governments passed their own eviction prevention measures—but these actions varied significantly across the country and left many renters vulnerable to eviction once again.
Then, on September 4, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued another moratorium on evictions through December 31, 2020. While this will certainly help those who rent — temporarily — all the moratorium did was pass the burden onto the landlord who may no longer be able to pay the mortgage on the property without the incoming rent.
And no, contrary to what many believe, most landlords are not mega rich property owners and live modest lifestyles.
In fact, according to an analysis by the Brookings Institute 40 percent of residential property units are owned by individual investor landlords. Among those owning residential investment property, roughly a third are from low- to moderate-income households; property income constitutes up to 20 percent of their total household income.
Now, without some sort of assistance for the burden placed on smaller landlords another massive crisis is unfolding. To understand why this crisis is unfolding it needs to be made clear that a moratorium doesn’t forgive rent payments, it only allows the renter to defer them. However, if a tenant cannot come up with monthly rent right now, the idea of paying back multiple months of compounded rent after the moratorium is over, will be all but impossible.
This lack of income will then be passed to the small business landlord who will then default on their loan payments and these houses will be repossessed by the banks. Given that the majority of rental homes are owned by individual “mom and pop” operations — not massive real estate companies — the resultant defaults could be catastrophic. Bank owned homes will likely not be subject to a moratorium and the occupants will be thrown out on the street.
One would think that the government would be paying attention to these food and housing crises and take action to prevent the inevitable collapse that will ensue with their current policies in place. That action would come in the form of rental assistance or other relief packages that could prevent such a devastating chain reaction of default and subsequent eviction. Unfortunately, however, government is gonna do what government is gonna do and it has taken no action to prevent the inevitable chaos.
Instead of passing relief packages to help the American citizens who have been forced out of work by governors across the country, partisan politicians have acted like children, refusing to reach a compromise on how that relief would come. It’s akin to childish bickering in a school yard but it will affect millions.
In the meantime, however, as the left and the right ignore the mass suffering of their constituents and ensure a massive economic collapse in the near future, they have and always will agree on one thing — war.
Both Republicans and Democrats in the House passed a $694.6 billion version of the Pentagon spending bill in July for fiscal year 2021. Nearly three quarters of a trillion dollars will go to furthering the militaristic expeditions of the US empire over the next year as part of this package.
The Senate proposed the final version of this Pentagon spending bill this week and the total $1.4 trillion package will likely be approved with little resistance.
The fact that people still believe in the idea that government has our best interests in mind is mind blowing. They do not. Despite claiming to care in public, both parties ignore the plight of their citizens and grant billions in contracts to weapons manufacturers and foreign governments along the way — all to blow up brown people on the other side of the planet to keep their corporate masters appeased.
This should be expected though as it is the power of the two party paradigm. Partisan divide keeps people from seeing the reality that is the military industrial complex and the cancer it has become on this planet. The left and the right constantly argue over irrelevant talking points as the police and warfare state marches on.
The $27 trillion in debt is irrelevant to most people and the fact that millions of Americans are going hungry and on the verge of homelessness is written off as the fault of the “other party” that their party tells them to hate.
This is the state of the land of the free in 2020. Rest assured, if nothing radical changes, what little freedom is left in this country, will dissipate before we know it. And, most Americans will have become so dependent on the state by that time, they will gladly accept it.
Read the Full Article at Thefreethoughtproject.com.
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-11-16--Forced Vaccination Law in Denmark Abandoned After Public Protests

The ‘ epidemic law ’ would have handed the Danish government the power to enact mandatory quarantine measures against anyone infected with a dangerous disease , but it was the part about vaccinations that caused the biggest uproar .
“ The Danish Health Authority would be able to define groups of people who must be vaccinated in order to contain and eliminate a dangerous disease , ” reports the Local .
“ People who refuse the above can – in some situations – be coerced through physical detainment , with police allowed to assist.
” However , after nine straight @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , it has now been scrapped .
With a coronavirus vaccine within sight , governments across the world are mulling over what punitive measures to bring against those who refuse to take it .
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist ( kidney doctor ) , Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people .
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained @ @ @ @ @ @ @ practicing real , ethical medicine .
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines , no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public .
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children , and even adults .
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact , part of the Health Impact News network .

by Paul Joseph Watson
Summit News
Excerpts:
The ‘epidemic law’ would have handed the Danish government the power to enact mandatory quarantine measures against anyone infected with a dangerous disease, but it was the part about vaccinations that caused the biggest uproar.
“The Danish Health Authority would be able to define groups of people who must be vaccinated in order to contain and eliminate a dangerous disease,” reports the Local. “People who refuse the above can – in some situations – be coerced through physical detainment, with police allowed to assist.”
However, after nine straight days of protests against the new law, it has now been scrapped.
With a coronavirus vaccine within sight, governments across the world are mulling over what punitive measures to bring against those who refuse to take it.
Read the full article at Summit News.
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.
See Also:
Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Book – The Vaccine Court “The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program” ORDER HERE!
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
Order here!
Make a Statement for Health Freedom!
Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children, and even adults.
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact, part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!


healthimpactnews--2020-11-16--Are Websites Critical of Vaccines About to be Wiped Off the Internet as a New COVID Vaccine Becomes

Are Websites Critical of Vaccines About to be Wiped Off the Internet as a New COVID Vaccine Becomes Available?

As we mentioned earlier this month ( November , 2020 ) , the U.S. Government is illegally working together with Big Tech to squelch free speech on foreign policy , as they have seized dozens of domains of websites that disagree with their policy on Iran .
See : As DOJ Probes Big Tech Monopoly , They Also Use Big Tech to Remove Dozens of Websites Squelching Free Speech on Foreign Policy As we move closer to the launch of a COVID vaccine , will websites publishing the dangers of vaccines soon also be seized , so that when you @ @ @ @ @ @ @ our Health Impact News all you will see is this ?
Independent journalist Whitney Webb , writing for Unlimited Hangout , reports that intelligence agencies in the UK and US are now targeting websites that promote “ vaccine hesitancy.
” British and American state intelligence agencies are “ weaponizing truth ” to quash vaccine hesitancy as both nations prepare for mass inoculations , in a recently announced “ cyber war ” to be commanded by AI-powered arbiters of truth against information sources that challenge official narratives .
In just the past week , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and United Kingdom have discreetly let it be known that the cyber tools and online tactics previously designed for use in the post-9/11 “ war on terror ” are now being repurposed for use against information sources promoting “ vaccine hesitancy ” and information related to Covid-19 that runs counter to their state narratives .
A new cyber offensive was launched on Monday by the UK ’ s signal intelligence agency , Government Communications Headquarters ( GCHQ ) , which seeks to target websites that publish content deemed to be “ propaganda ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ development and the multi-national pharmaceutical corporations involved .
Similar efforts are underway in the United States , with the US military recently funding a CIA-backed firm—stuffed with former counterterrorism officials who were behind the occupation of Iraq and the rise of the so-called Islamic State—to develop an AI algorithm aimed specifically at new websites promoting “ suspected ” disinformation related to the Covid-19 crisis and the US military–led Covid-19 vaccination effort known as Operation Warp Speed .
Both countries are preparing to silence independent journalists who raise legitimate concerns over pharmaceutical industry corruption @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccination efforts , now that Pfizer ’ s vaccine candidate is slated to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) by month ’ s end .
Essentially , the power of the state is being wielded like never before to police online speech and to deplatform news websites to protect the interests of powerful corporations like Pfizer and other scandal-ridden pharmaceutical giants as well as the interests of the US and UK national-security states , which themselves are intimately involved in the Covid-19 vaccination endeavor .
Comment on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist ( kidney doctor ) , Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people .
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real , ethical medicine .
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines , no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public .
Say @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children , and even adults .
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact , part of the Health Impact News network .

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
As we mentioned earlier this month (November, 2020), the U.S. Government is illegally working together with Big Tech to squelch free speech on foreign policy, as they have seized dozens of domains of websites that disagree with their policy on Iran. See:
As we move closer to the launch of a COVID vaccine, will websites publishing the dangers of vaccines soon also be seized, so that when you try to visit a website such as our Health Impact News all you will see is this?
Independent journalist Whitney Webb, writing for Unlimited Hangout, reports that intelligence agencies in the UK and US are now targeting websites that promote “vaccine hesitancy.”
US – UK Intel Agencies Declare Cyber War on Independent Media
by Whitney Webb
Unlimitedhangout.com
Excerpts:
British and American state intelligence agencies are “weaponizing truth” to quash vaccine hesitancy as both nations prepare for mass inoculations, in a recently announced “cyber war” to be commanded by AI-powered arbiters of truth against information sources that challenge official narratives.
In just the past week, the national-security states of the United States and United Kingdom have discreetly let it be known that the cyber tools and online tactics previously designed for use in the post-9/11 “war on terror” are now being repurposed for use against information sources promoting “vaccine hesitancy” and information related to Covid-19 that runs counter to their state narratives.
A new cyber offensive was launched on Monday by the UK’s signal intelligence agency, Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), which seeks to target websites that publish content deemed to be “propaganda” that raises concerns regarding state-sponsored Covid-19 vaccine development and the multi-national pharmaceutical corporations involved.
Similar efforts are underway in the United States, with the US military recently funding a CIA-backed firm—stuffed with former counterterrorism officials who were behind the occupation of Iraq and the rise of the so-called Islamic State—to develop an AI algorithm aimed specifically at new websites promoting “suspected” disinformation related to the Covid-19 crisis and the US military–led Covid-19 vaccination effort known as Operation Warp Speed.
Both countries are preparing to silence independent journalists who raise legitimate concerns over pharmaceutical industry corruption or the extreme secrecy surrounding state-sponsored Covid-19 vaccination efforts, now that Pfizer’s vaccine candidate is slated to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by month’s end.
Essentially, the power of the state is being wielded like never before to police online speech and to deplatform news websites to protect the interests of powerful corporations like Pfizer and other scandal-ridden pharmaceutical giants as well as the interests of the US and UK national-security states, which themselves are intimately involved in the Covid-19 vaccination endeavor.
Read the full article at Unlimitedhangout.com.
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.
See Also:
Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Book – The Vaccine Court “The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program” ORDER HERE!
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
Order here!
Make a Statement for Health Freedom!
Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children, and even adults.
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact, part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!


healthimpactnews--2020-11-17--The COVID Cult: Greatest Public Health Fiasco in the History of the World

This is the greatest public health fiasco in the history of the world , and the media has distorted it @ @ @ @ @ of the general public is celebrating villains and hissing at heroes .
And , even @ @ @ @ @ the destruction of their own lives and their children ’ s lives .
Special thanks @ @ @ @ @ yinonw ) and Ian Miller ( @ ianmSC ) for creating the charts .
Presented @ @ @ @ @ s “ Symposium with Ron Paul ” on Saturday , 7 November 2020 , in @ @ @ @ @ problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your @ @

by Mises Media
This is the greatest public health fiasco in the history of the world, and the media has distorted it so badly, that much of the general public is celebrating villains and hissing at heroes. And, even — perversely enough — celebrating the destruction of their own lives and their children’s lives.
Special thanks to Yinon Weiss (@yinonw) and Ian Miller (@ianmSC) for creating the charts.
Presented at the Mises Institute’s “Symposium with Ron Paul” on Saturday, 7 November 2020, in Angleton, Texas.
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-11-18--UK Citizens Could Be Banned From Going Into Work Without Proof Of COVID Vaccination

UK workers could find themselves banned from pubs , restaurants , and possibly even the workplace if they refuse to get the COVID-19 vaccine , according to a senior MP .
Speaking with HuffPost UK ’ s Commons People podcast , as noted by Metro , Conservative Tom Tugendhat has warned that he could ‘ certainly see the day ’ when proof of vaccination was required to return to normal life .
“ And I can certainly see social venues asking for vaccination certificates.
” That said , a government mandate over the vaccine is reportedly not on the immediate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
The MP was speaking in the week Pfizer ’ s vaccine candidate was proven to be 90 % effective .
Preparations are now being made to administer the jab , and potentially others that are still in development .
The Government has outlined its strategy for getting people vaccinated as quickly as possible , starting with those who are most vulnerable or are working on the frontline of the pandemic .
Despite some experts urging the Government to make getting the vaccine mandatory , Health Minister Matt Hancock has previously stressed that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ –Metro As we noted last week , US-based Ticketmaster is planning to verify concertgoers ’ vaccination status or whether they ’ ve tested negative for COVID-19 within a 24-72 hour window .
MP Tugendhat , who chairs the foreign affairs committee , also pointed to foreign travel as another example industries which already require proof of vaccinations for visitors trying to enter certain countries .
“ I remember when I used to travel rather more than I do now – when you go into certain countries you had to show a yellow fever @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a yellow fever certificate you weren ’ t allowed in the country and that was that , ” said Tugendhat , adding “ There was no debates , no appeals and no further requests .
And I can see a situation where yes , of course you ’ re free not to have the vaccine , but there are consequences.
” When asked whether he thought public transport and similar services might follow suit in requiring ‘ immunity passports ’ , he replied “ It would depend what the public services were , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ wouldn ’ t want to start predicting.
“ Recently , the United Nations had some big announcements that went largely unnoticed , including the rollout of a biometric digital wallet and an announcement that one of its specialized agencies The International Civil Aviation Organization is one step closer to a internationally recognized digital travel credential .
As reported by Biometric Update , this particular UN biometric digital wallet is intended for UN employees and it can be used for data related to human resources , medical status , travel , payroll and pensions @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is going , every aspect of our lives will be centralized digitally using biometrics and in many cases the blockchain , AI and 5G .
I can ’ t help but to raise the question , what kind of social controls could this possibly provide the technocrats if people decide not to obey certain restrictions or requirements ?
Example : If you didn ’ t get your latest shot , individuals may face travel restrictions .
Or , you may not be able go to work , or your payments may be frozen @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have to mandate anything if they can ‘ encourage ’ you to obey .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

by Tyler Durden
ZeroHedge News
UK workers could find themselves banned from pubs, restaurants, and possibly even the workplace if they refuse to get the COVID-19 vaccine, according to a senior MP.
Speaking with HuffPost UK’s Commons People podcast, as noted by Metro, Conservative Tom Tugendhat has warned that he could ‘certainly see the day’ when proof of vaccination was required to return to normal life.
‘If vaccination works and if we’re confident it’s safe, and all indications so far are good, then I can certainly see the day when businesses say: “Look, you’ve got to return to the office and if you’re not vaccinated you’re not coming in,”‘ he added.
“And I can certainly see social venues asking for vaccination certificates.” That said, a government mandate over the vaccine is reportedly not on the immediate horizon, per Health Minister Matt Hancock.
The MP was speaking in the week Pfizer’s vaccine candidate was proven to be 90% effective. Preparations are now being made to administer the jab, and potentially others that are still in development. The Government has outlined its strategy for getting people vaccinated as quickly as possible, starting with those who are most vulnerable or are working on the frontline of the pandemic. Despite some experts urging the Government to make getting the vaccine mandatory, Health Minister Matt Hancock has previously stressed that this will not be the case. –Metro
As we noted last week, US-based Ticketmaster is planning to verify concertgoers’ vaccination status or whether they’ve tested negative for COVID-19 within a 24-72 hour window.
MP Tugendhat, who chairs the foreign affairs committee, also pointed to foreign travel as another example industries which already require proof of vaccinations for visitors trying to enter certain countries.
“I remember when I used to travel rather more than I do now – when you go into certain countries you had to show a yellow fever certificate and if you did not have a yellow fever certificate you weren’t allowed in the country and that was that,” said Tugendhat, adding “There was no debates, no appeals and no further requests. And I can see a situation where yes, of course you’re free not to have the vaccine, but there are consequences.”
When asked whether he thought public transport and similar services might follow suit in requiring ‘immunity passports’, he replied “It would depend what the public services were, and who and when, so I wouldn’t want to start predicting.“
Read the full article at ZeroHedge News
UN Announces Biometric Digital ID Wallet
by Spiro Skouras
Recently, the United Nations had some big announcements that went largely unnoticed, including the rollout of a biometric digital wallet and an announcement that one of its specialized agencies The International Civil Aviation Organization is one step closer to a internationally recognized digital travel credential.
As reported by Biometric Update, this particular UN biometric digital wallet is intended for UN employees and it can be used for data related to human resources, medical status, travel, payroll and pensions.
I hope you see where this is going, every aspect of our lives will be centralized digitally using biometrics and in many cases the blockchain, AI and 5G.
I can’t help but to raise the question, what kind of social controls could this possibly provide the technocrats if people decide not to obey certain restrictions or requirements?
Example: If you didn’t get your latest shot, individuals may face travel restrictions. Or, you may not be able go to work, or your payments may be frozen until you comply.
They may not have to mandate anything if they can ‘encourage’ you to obey.
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-11-18--Pfizer and Moderna COVID Vaccine Results NOT based on Peer-Reviewed Science – ZERO Liability to Comp

Pfizer and Moderna COVID Vaccine Results NOT based on Peer-Reviewed Science – ZERO Liability to Companies if Vaccine Kills or Injures due to FDA Fast-track Approval

VAXXED film producer Polly Tomney and attorney Mary Holland of Children ’ s Health Defense discuss the two most recent COVID vaccine press releases from Pfizer and Moderna which both claimed over “ 90 % effective ” and just what this means .
Because these vaccines are expected to apply for FDA fast-track approval due to the COVID “ emergency , ” they do not go through the same peer-reviewed process , and if the vaccines end up injuring or killing anyone , they are immune from any legal liability .
Originally live-streamed on Facebook , but copied to the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on this article at VaccineImpact.com .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist ( kidney doctor ) , Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people .
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real , ethical medicine .
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines , no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children , and even adults .
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact , part of the Health Impact News network .

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
VAXXED film producer Polly Tomney and attorney Mary Holland of Children’s Health Defense discuss the two most recent COVID vaccine press releases from Pfizer and Moderna which both claimed over “90% effective” and just what this means.
Because these vaccines are expected to apply for FDA fast-track approval due to the COVID “emergency,” they do not go through the same peer-reviewed process, and if the vaccines end up injuring or killing anyone, they are immune from any legal liability.
Originally live-streamed on Facebook, but copied to the Health Impact News Bitchute channel.
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.
See Also:
Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Book – The Vaccine Court “The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program” ORDER HERE!
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
Order here!
Make a Statement for Health Freedom!
Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children, and even adults.
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact, part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!


healthimpactnews--2020-11-19--Is the UK Expecting a “High Volume” of COVID Vaccine Adverse Reactions?

By The Highwire with Del Bigtree The UK is preparing for a mass Covid vaccination campaign , anticipating the injection of millions of citizens with the experimental vaccine .
As the date approaches to launch this unprecedented measure , the UK ’ s top health body , the MHRA , makes a shocking , urgent request which begs the question : ‘ Is the Covid Vaccine safe ?
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Humphries is now free to actually help cure people .
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real , ethical medicine .
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines , no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public .
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children , and even adults .
Show your opposition to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Vaccine Impact , part of the Health Impact News network .

By The Highwire with Del Bigtree
The UK is preparing for a mass Covid vaccination campaign, anticipating the injection of millions of citizens with the experimental vaccine.
As the date approaches to launch this unprecedented measure, the UK’s top health body, the MHRA, makes a shocking, urgent request which begs the question: ‘Is the Covid Vaccine safe?
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.
See Also:
Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Book – The Vaccine Court “The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program” ORDER HERE!
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
Order here!
Make a Statement for Health Freedom!
Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children, and even adults.
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact, part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!


healthimpactnews--2020-11-19--Police Use Water Cannons Against Large Crowds in Berlin as Europeans Continue to Protest New Lockdow

Police Use Water Cannons Against Large Crowds in Berlin as Europeans Continue to Protest New Lockdowns

Police in Berlin used water cannons on anti-lockdown protesters who were demonstrating near the Brandenburg Gate against new COVID-19 laws @ @ @ @ @ The new law would codify current social distancing requirements , mandate mask wearing and increase @ @ @ @ @ the rules .
The measures are expected to pass both lower and then upper houses @ @ @ @ @ didn ’ t stop thousands of protesters defying a government ban to descend on the @ @ @ @ @ law .
Police turned water cannons on demonstrators as the crowd booed while LRAD sound @ @ @ @ @ However , as the videos show , the size of the gathering was far too @ @ @ @ @ to have much effect .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to @ @ @ @ @ Your Own Newsfeed

by Paul Joseph Watson
Summit News
Excerpts:
Police in Berlin used water cannons on anti-lockdown protesters who were demonstrating near the Brandenburg Gate against new COVID-19 laws they claim are unconstitutional.
The new law would codify current social distancing requirements, mandate mask wearing and increase the punishment for those flouting the rules.
The measures are expected to pass both lower and then upper houses of parliament, but that didn’t stop thousands of protesters defying a government ban to descend on the Bundestag in opposition to the law.
Police turned water cannons on demonstrators as the crowd booed while LRAD sound cannons were also utilized.
However, as the videos show, the size of the gathering was far too large for the water cannons to have much effect.
Read the full article at Summit News.
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-11-18--Don’t Believe the COVID Case Numbers: It’s a Scam

I ’ ve been saying this for 9 months .
Don ’ t believe the COVID case numbers .
It ’ s a wall-to-wall scam .
The situation we ’ re facing is urgent right now .
Red flags .
Alarm bells .
Politicians all over the US and the world are using “ rising case numbers ” to drive people back into lockdowns .
The news media are trumpeting these reports of case numbers .
THE CASE NUMBERS COME FROM THE TESTS .
AND FROM EYEBALL DIAGNOSIS .
Eyeball diagnosis can mean a doctor observes the patient has a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ That ’ s all .
That ’ s all a doctor needs to make a diagnosis of COVID .
That ’ s a case number .
Ridiculous ?
Of course it ’ s ridiculous .
It ’ s a con .
Brought to you by the CDC .
The PCR test , as I ’ ve explained dozens of times , spits out false-positives like waterfalls .
It ’ s set up to do exactly that .
Increase testing and you automatically get rising case numbers .
That ’ s the real reason @ @ @ @ @ @ @ you have the scam in a nutshell .
The fascist public health agencies and the politicians WANT lockdowns .
They know the only way to justify the lockdowns is to claim rising case numbers .
There ’ s another wrinkle you should be aware of .
You ’ re seeing reports of “ rising numbers of hospitalizations.
” Wherever this is true ( and not an outright lie ) , people could be coming to the hospital for any reason under the sun—including fear that they might “ have the virus.
” In @ @ @ @ @ @ @ money for every diagnosed COVID case .
These hospitals need money .
Simply and arbitrarily writing “ COVID-19 ” on patient files becomes a way to get that money .
Occasionally , I receive reports from people who work at hospitals or know people who work at hospitals .
The reports usually go this way : “ We ’ re seeing very serious cases here .
People are arriving with unusual symptoms… ” First of all , this is what hospitals are built for : people who are seriously ill .
Some weeks @ @ @ @ @ @ @ all over the world , there are always people who have unusual symptoms , resulting from a variety of causes .
No virus required .
I recently published a smoking-gun article on the PCR test .
This was during the initial furor of the election ( another example of fake numbers ) .
For those who missed reading the article , and for new readers , here it is : Smoking gun : Fauci states COVID test has fatal flaw ; confession from the “ beloved ” expert of experts [ 1 ] @ @ @ @ @ @ @ apart .
OK , here we go .
Smoking gun .
Jackpot .
Right from the horse ’ s mouth .
Right from the man we ’ re told is the number-one COVID expert in the nation .
What Fauci says is golden truth .
Well , how about THIS ?
July 16 , 2020 , podcast [ 2 ] , “ This Week in Virology ” : Tony Fauci makes a point of saying the PCR COVID test is useless and misleading when the test is run at “ 35 cycles or @ @ @ @ @ @ @ infection , can not be accepted or believed .
Here , in techno-speak , is an excerpt from Fauci ’ s key quote ( starting at about the 4-minute mark ) : “ …If you get [ perform the test at ] a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-confident [ aka accurate ] are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus [ detect a true positive result ] from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36… ” Each “ cycle ” of the test is a quantum leap in amplification and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the patient .
Too many cycles , and the test will turn up all sorts of irrelevant material that will be wrongly interpreted as relevant .
What Fauci failed to say on the video is : the FDA , which authorizes the test for public use , recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles .
Not 35 .
Therefore , all labs in the US that follow the FDA guideline are knowingly or unknowingly participating in fraud .
Fraud on a monstrous level , because… Millions of Americans are being @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on the basis of a false positive result , and… The total number of COVID cases in America—which is based on the test—is a gross falsity .
The lockdowns and other restraining measures are based on these fraudulent case numbers .
Let me back up and run that by you again .
Fauci says the test is useless when it ’ s run at 35 cycles or higher .
The FDA says run the test up to 40 cycles , in order to determine whether the virus is there .
This is the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ in the White House has a few brain cells to rub together , pick up a giant bullhorn and start revealing the truth to the American people .
“ Hello , America , you ’ ve been tricked , lied to , conned , and taken for a devastating ride .
On the basis of fake science , the country was locked down.
” If anyone in the Congress has a few brain cells operating , pull Fauci into a televised hearing and , in ten minutes , make mincemeat out of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ foul stench-ridden assault on the US economy and its citizens .
All right , here are two chunks of evidence for what I ’ ve written above .
First , we have a CDC quote on the FDA website , in a document titled [ 3 ] : “ CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus ( 2019-nCoV ) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use Only.
” See page 35 .
This document is marked , “ Effective : 07/13/20.
” That means , even though the virus is being referred to by its older name @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of July 2020 .
“ For Emergency Use Only ” refers to the fact that the FDA has certified the PCR test under a traditional category called “ Emergency Use Authorization.
” FDA : “ …a specimen is considered positive for 2019-nCoV [ virus ] if all 2019-nCoV marker ( N1 , N2 ) cycle threshold [ Ct ] growth curves cross the threshold line within 40.00 cycles ( [ less than ] 40.00 Ct ) .
” Naturally , MANY testing labs reading this guideline would conclude , “ Well , to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a patient , we should run the test all the way to 40 cycles .
That ’ s the official advice.
” Then we have a New York Times article ( August 29/updated September 17 ) headlined : “ Your coronavirus test is positive .
Maybe it shouldn ’ t be.
” [ 4 ] Here are money quotes : “ Most tests set the limit at 40 [ cycles ] .
A few at 37.
” “ Set the limit ” would usually mean , “ We ’ re going to look @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to see if the virus is there.
” The Times : “ This number of amplification cycles needed to find the virus , called the cycle threshold , is never included in the results sent to doctors and coronavirus patients… ” Boom .
That ’ s the capper , the grand finale .
Labs don ’ t or won ’ t reveal their collusion in this crime .
If a lawyer won ’ t go to court with all this , or if a judge won ’ t pay attention and see the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their jobs and sent to the Arctic to sell snow .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

by Jon Rappoport
NoMoreFakeNews.com
I’ve been saying this for 9 months. Don’t believe the COVID case numbers. It’s a wall-to-wall scam.
The situation we’re facing is urgent right now. Red flags. Alarm bells.
Politicians all over the US and the world are using “rising case numbers” to drive people back into lockdowns.
The news media are trumpeting these reports of case numbers.
THE CASE NUMBERS COME FROM THE TESTS. AND FROM EYEBALL DIAGNOSIS.
Eyeball diagnosis can mean a doctor observes the patient has a cough, or chills and fever. That’s all. That’s all a doctor needs to make a diagnosis of COVID. That’s a case number. Ridiculous? Of course it’s ridiculous. It’s a con. Brought to you by the CDC.
The PCR test, as I’ve explained dozens of times, spits out false-positives like waterfalls. It’s set up to do exactly that.
Increase testing and you automatically get rising case numbers. That’s the real reason for pushing expanded testing.
And there you have the scam in a nutshell.
The fascist public health agencies and the politicians WANT lockdowns. They know the only way to justify the lockdowns is to claim rising case numbers.
There’s another wrinkle you should be aware of. You’re seeing reports of “rising numbers of hospitalizations.” Wherever this is true (and not an outright lie), people could be coming to the hospital for any reason under the sun—including fear that they might “have the virus.” In the US, state hospitals receive federal money for every diagnosed COVID case. These hospitals need money. Simply and arbitrarily writing “COVID-19” on patient files becomes a way to get that money.
Occasionally, I receive reports from people who work at hospitals or know people who work at hospitals. The reports usually go this way: “We’re seeing very serious cases here. People are arriving with unusual symptoms…”
First of all, this is what hospitals are built for: people who are seriously ill. Some weeks are busier than others. Second, all over the world, there are always people who have unusual symptoms, resulting from a variety of causes. No virus required.
I recently published a smoking-gun article on the PCR test. This was during the initial furor of the election (another example of fake numbers). For those who missed reading the article, and for new readers, here it is:
Smoking gun: Fauci states COVID test has fatal flaw; confession from the “beloved” expert of experts [1]
The COVID delusion is finished, blown apart.
OK, here we go. Smoking gun. Jackpot.
Right from the horse’s mouth. Right from the man we’re told is the number-one COVID expert in the nation. What Fauci says is golden truth.
Well, how about THIS?
July 16, 2020, podcast [2], “This Week in Virology”: Tony Fauci makes a point of saying the PCR COVID test is useless and misleading when the test is run at “35 cycles or higher.” A positive result, indicating infection, cannot be accepted or believed.
Here, in techno-speak, is an excerpt from Fauci’s key quote (starting at about the 4-minute mark): “…If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-confident [aka accurate] are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…”
Each “cycle” of the test is a quantum leap in amplification and magnification of the test specimen taken from the patient.
Too many cycles, and the test will turn up all sorts of irrelevant material that will be wrongly interpreted as relevant.
That’s called a false positive.
What Fauci failed to say on the video is: the FDA, which authorizes the test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles. Not 35.
Therefore, all labs in the US that follow the FDA guideline are knowingly or unknowingly participating in fraud. Fraud on a monstrous level, because…
Millions of Americans are being told they are infected with the virus on the basis of a false positive result, and…
The total number of COVID cases in America—which is based on the test—is a gross falsity.
The lockdowns and other restraining measures are based on these fraudulent case numbers.
Let me back up and run that by you again. Fauci says the test is useless when it’s run at 35 cycles or higher. The FDA says run the test up to 40 cycles, in order to determine whether the virus is there. This is the crime in a nutshell.
If anyone in the White House has a few brain cells to rub together, pick up a giant bullhorn and start revealing the truth to the American people.
“Hello, America, you’ve been tricked, lied to, conned, and taken for a devastating ride. On the basis of fake science, the country was locked down.”
If anyone in the Congress has a few brain cells operating, pull Fauci into a televised hearing and, in ten minutes, make mincemeat out of the fake science that has driven this whole foul stench-ridden assault on the US economy and its citizens.
All right, here are two chunks of evidence for what I’ve written above. First, we have a CDC quote on the FDA website, in a document titled [3]: “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use Only.” See page 35. This document is marked, “Effective: 07/13/20.” That means, even though the virus is being referred to by its older name, the document is still relevant as of July 2020. “For Emergency Use Only” refers to the fact that the FDA has certified the PCR test under a traditional category called “Emergency Use Authorization.”
FDA: “…a specimen is considered positive for 2019-nCoV [virus] if all 2019-nCoV marker (N1, N2) cycle threshold [Ct] growth curves cross the threshold line within 40.00 cycles ( [less than] 40.00 Ct ).”
Naturally, MANY testing labs reading this guideline would conclude, “Well, to see if the virus is there in a patient, we should run the test all the way to 40 cycles. That’s the official advice.”
Then we have a New York Times article (August 29/updated September 17) headlined: “Your coronavirus test is positive. Maybe it shouldn’t be.” [4] Here are money quotes:
“Most tests set the limit at 40 [cycles]. A few at 37.”
“Set the limit” would usually mean, “We’re going to look all the way to 40 cycles, to see if the virus is there.”
The Times: “This number of amplification cycles needed to find the virus, called the cycle threshold, is never included in the results sent to doctors and coronavirus patients…”
Boom. That’s the capper, the grand finale. Labs don’t or won’t reveal their collusion in this crime.
Get the picture?
I hope so.
If a lawyer won’t go to court with all this, or if a judge won’t pay attention and see the light, they should be stripped of their jobs and sent to the Arctic to sell snow.
SOURCES:
[1] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/11/06/smoking-gun-fauci-states-covid-test-has-fatal-flaw/
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_Vy6fgaBPE
[3] https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
[4] nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-11-18--Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests As Unreliable & Unlawful To Quarantine People

A Portuguese appeals court has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test .
The court stated , the test ’ s reliability depends on the number of cycles used and the viral load present .
Citing Jaafar et al .
2020 , the court concludes that : if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used ( as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US ) , the probability that said person is infected @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the probability that said result is a false positive is 97 % .
The court further notes that the cycle threshold used for the PCR tests currently being made in Portugal is unknown .
The threshold cycles used in PCR tests in India is between 37 and 40 , which makes the reliability of the PCR test less than 3 % and the false positive rate as high as 97 % .
This case concerned the fact that four people had been quarantined by the Regional Health Authority .
Of these , one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ PCR test ; the other three were deemed to have undergone a high risk of exposure .
Consequently , the Regional Health Authority decided that all four were infectious and a health hazard , which required that they go into isolation .
The court ’ s summary of the case to rule against the Regional Health Authority ’ s appeal reads as follows : Given how much scientific doubt exists — as voiced by experts , i.e.
, those who matter — about the reliability of the PCR tests , given the lack @ @ @ @ @ @ @ parameters , and in the absence of a physician ’ s diagnosis supporting the existence of infection or risk , there is no way this court would ever be able to determine whether C was indeed a carrier of the SARS-CoV-2 virus , or whether A , B and D had been at a high risk of exposure to it .
It is also important to remember PCR was invented as a way to create copies of genetic material .
Its was never intended to be a diagnostic tool .
The standard coronavirus @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of positive cases daily .
These tests are done based on faulty WHO protocols which are designed to include false positives cases as well .
This fact about false positives of PCR Tests was first noted in public by Dr. Beda M. Stadler , a Swiss biologist , emeritus professor , and former director of the Institute of Immunology at the University of Bern .
So if we do a PCR corona test on an immune person , it is not a virus that is detected , but a small shattered part of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ back positive for as long as there are tiny shattered parts of the virus left .
Correct : Even if the infectious viruses are long dead , a corona test can come back positive , because the PCR method multiplies even a tiny fraction of the viral genetic material enough [ to be detected ] .
Earlier , the WHO ’ s testing protocol was even questioned by Finland ’ s national health authority .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

by GreatGameIndia.com
A Portuguese appeals court has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test.
The court stated, the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used and the viral load present. Citing Jaafar et al. 2020, the court concludes that:
if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.
The court further notes that the cycle threshold used for the PCR tests currently being made in Portugal is unknown.
The threshold cycles used in PCR tests in India is between 37 and 40, which makes the reliability of the PCR test less than 3% and the false positive rate as high as 97%.
This case concerned the fact that four people had been quarantined by the Regional Health Authority. Of these, one had tested positive for COVID using a PCR test; the other three were deemed to have undergone a high risk of exposure.
Consequently, the Regional Health Authority decided that all four were infectious and a health hazard, which required that they go into isolation.
The court’s summary of the case to rule against the Regional Health Authority’s appeal reads as follows:
Given how much scientific doubt exists — as voiced by experts, i.e., those who matter — about the reliability of the PCR tests, given the lack of information concerning the tests’ analytical parameters, and in the absence of a physician’s diagnosis supporting the existence of infection or risk, there is no way this court would ever be able to determine whether C was indeed a carrier of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, or whether A, B and D had been at a high risk of exposure to it. It is also important to remember PCR was invented as a way to create copies of genetic material. Its was never intended to be a diagnostic tool. The standard coronavirus tests are throwing up a huge number of positive cases daily. These tests are done based on faulty WHO protocols which are designed to include false positives cases as well. This fact about false positives of PCR Tests was first noted in public by Dr. Beda M. Stadler, a Swiss biologist, emeritus professor, and former director of the Institute of Immunology at the University of Bern. So if we do a PCR corona test on an immune person, it is not a virus that is detected, but a small shattered part of the viral genome. The test comes back positive for as long as there are tiny shattered parts of the virus left. Correct: Even if the infectious viruses are long dead, a corona test can come back positive, because the PCR method multiplies even a tiny fraction of the viral genetic material enough [to be detected]. Earlier, the WHO’s testing protocol was even questioned by Finland’s national health authority. Read the full article at GreatGameIndia.com.
See Also: