healthimpactnews--2020-10-23--Doctors vs. Doctors: Who’s Telling the Truth?

There ’ s a civil war raging across the U.S. today , pitting medical doctors against other medical doctors .
And it ’ s not because they are on opposite sides of the political spectrum .
It ’ s because they are on opposite sides of the truth .
This is not a new war , of course , as those of us in the Alternative Health media have covered these medical topics for many years now .
The Wall Street Billionaires , many of them part of the Pharmaceutical Industry , control the corporate media giants to put forth @ @ @ @ @ @ @ to believe , that benefits the goals and purposes of Wall Street , not the general public .
They fund most all of the top medical schools , and hire those with medical degrees from these schools and then parade them in front of the cameras to read the script that they write to determine public health policy .
Doctors who actually care about the health of their patients and follow the truth no matter where it leads , and are on the front lines every day treating their patients , are quickly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ” and censored .
This is purely a business issue for the medical industry , and in recent years they are not even hiding the fact that a medical system that actually cures people is bad for business .
See : Investment Report Reveals Medical Cures not Profitable for Big Pharma – Sick People Needed to Sustain Drug Sales This has been going on in the vaccine industry for decades now .
They use their media companies to try and convince the public that all doctors are agreed on various topics they want @ @ @ @ @ @ @ there is a “ scientific consensus ” among “ doctors , ” so everything is settled .
This has been especially true in the vaccine industry for the past several decades .
But as we have reported over the years , there is actually no consensus among medical doctors concerning vaccines , with many doctors questioning the effects of vaccines that they see in their patients , most of them young children .
They want the public to believe that the only “ anti-vaxxers ” that exist are uninformed parents , or uneducated @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , that the medical industry is like any other industry , and is comprised of different people with different views and experiences , and that most certainly includes vaccines .
See : COVID Information is Now a War Between Politician Doctors and Practicing Physicians The current COVID situation is now an all-out war between the Wall Street Big Pharma funded political doctors and their control over the corporate media , and the doctors on the front lines who are actually treating real patients .
Many of these REAL doctors are now , sadly @ @ @ @ @ @ @ what they do best , which is treat their patients , and form groups to try and get the truth out about what they have actually learned about COVID in a clinical setting , as opposed to government-funded political “ doctors ” who make the rounds on TV and try to get studies published .
These practicing physicians are now forming their own groups to try and fight censorship as their numbers swell across the globe .
One of the most recent groups is The World Doctors Alliance .
The politician TV doctors @ @ @ @ @ @ @ their side , but that is only because they use their own definition of “ science , ” which really has nothing to do with “ truth , ” but AUTHORITY .
If you read or listen carefully to what they say , you will soon understand they just want the public to trust them because they are “ doctors , ” and claim to represent a consensus in the “ scientific community.
” But if you do your own “ fact checking ” and search the medical and scientific literature yourself , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ very obvious that they do not have the truth or facts on their side most of the time .
One of the most obvious examples currently affecting nearly everyone , is the belief that face masks will prevent disease and save lives .
The scientific literature states the exact opposite , and even studies , REAL studies , done on comparing operating rooms where surgeons where face masks to prevent infection , with surgeons who do not , show that the outcomes of hospital acquired infections are NOT affected by face masks , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ held by most .
See : The Great Unmasking : Studies in the Medical Literature Show FEWER Infections in Surgery when Medical Staff Do NOT Wear Masks Physician and Medical Journal Editor : Healthy People Should Not Wear Face Masks New CDC and WHO Study Proves “ No Evidence ” Face Masks Prevent Virus New Health Problems Emerging from Continuous Mask Wearing , but “ Attempted Murder ” Charges Sought for Those Who Refuse to Wear Masks So if the truth is that face masks do not protect us from COVID , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have so many people become convinced of just the opposite ?
By using a political media doctor to tell everyone he/she is correct , based on his/her scientific credentials , and that everyone else who disagrees with them is wrong .
And scare the hell out of everyone in the process so they obey !
Here is a perfect example of that happening today from the New York Times , one of Big Pharma ’ s media properties : The pandemic death toll could be lowered by next spring if more Americans wear @ @ @ @ @ @ @ In our day of information overload in the technology era , how many people will even click through and read this article , as opposed to just accepting it as true since , after all , it is the “ New York Times ” ?
But if you do click through and try to find any real science to back up this very specific claim , you will easily see that this story belongs in the editorial section , and should NOT be published as “ news.
” It based on the opinion @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the “ lead author , ” who as far as I could research has never actually practiced medicine and treated patients , and it is based on a “ predictive analysis ” of the future , where he gets to control all the data inputs to achieve the desired result of what they want the public to believe .
This “ analysis ” also got published in one of their “ scientific ” publications to make it look more credible .
Universal mask use could prevent nearly 130,000 deaths from Covid-19 , the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the United States through next spring , scientists reported on Friday .
A surge of infections , driven in part by neglect of safety precautions , has begun to overwhelm hospitals in much of the nation .
More than 75,000 new cases were reported in the United States on Thursday , the second-highest daily total nationwide since the pandemic began .
Eight states set single-day case records .
These numbers are likely to continue through the fall and winter , with a steady rise in cases and deaths until January and staying high @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , director of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington and lead author of the report .
“ We strongly believe we are heading into a pretty grim winter season , ” Dr. Murray said .
The new study , published in the journal Nature Medicine , also offered a rough estimate of the pandemic ’ s toll in the United States : perhaps 500,000 deaths by March 2021 , even with social distancing mandates reinstated in most states .
Other experts cautioned that , as with any @ @ @ @ @ @ @ on many assumptions and should not be seen as predictions .
The key words here to get the public to buy into this are : “ scientists , ” “ experts , ” and of course the person quoted must have the “ Dr. ” in front of their name .
They also continue to use “ new cases ” to try and back up their claims , which just means someone got a positive test result for COVID whether they were sick or not .
They also use the common corporate media @ @ @ @ @ @ @ without mentioning any specific hospitals so this claim can be checked .
They also attack dissenting doctors , in this case Dr. Scott W. Atlas , who ironically is another political doctor but who does not support their narrative , and use Twitter to claim that Dr. Atlas is misleading people .
The Corporate Media is Brainwashing People with Propaganda I have been writing in the Alternative Health field for almost a decade now , and I am very well accustomed to the corporate media propaganda campaigns , and who funds them .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ that has no basis in the truth or science , and where literally hundreds of thousands of REAL doctors are now forming groups and telling the public the truth , is unprecedented .
I have never seen anything like this in my lifetime .
Is the Republic doomed ?
Are people really this blind , and this lazy to not do their own research to learn the truth ?
Doctors for Truth : Tens of Thousands Medical Professionals Suing and Calling for End to COVID Tyranny Editors of The Lancet and the New @ @ @ @ @ @ @ are so Financially Powerful They Pressure us to Accept Papers Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
There’s a civil war raging across the U.S. today, pitting medical doctors against other medical doctors.
And it’s not because they are on opposite sides of the political spectrum. It’s because they are on opposite sides of the truth.
This is not a new war, of course, as those of us in the Alternative Health media have covered these medical topics for many years now.
The Wall Street Billionaires, many of them part of the Pharmaceutical Industry, control the corporate media giants to put forth a unified message they want the public to believe, that benefits the goals and purposes of Wall Street, not the general public.
They fund most all of the top medical schools, and hire those with medical degrees from these schools and then parade them in front of the cameras to read the script that they write to determine public health policy.
Doctors who actually care about the health of their patients and follow the truth no matter where it leads, and are on the front lines every day treating their patients, are quickly silenced, or labeled as “quacks” and censored.
This is purely a business issue for the medical industry, and in recent years they are not even hiding the fact that a medical system that actually cures people is bad for business. See:
This has been going on in the vaccine industry for decades now. They use their media companies to try and convince the public that all doctors are agreed on various topics they want to promote, and proudly declare that there is a “scientific consensus” among “doctors,” so everything is settled.
This has been especially true in the vaccine industry for the past several decades.
But as we have reported over the years, there is actually no consensus among medical doctors concerning vaccines, with many doctors questioning the effects of vaccines that they see in their patients, most of them young children.
They want the public to believe that the only “anti-vaxxers” that exist are uninformed parents, or uneducated celebrities.
The truth is, however, that the medical industry is like any other industry, and is comprised of different people with different views and experiences, and that most certainly includes vaccines. See:
COVID Information is Now a War Between Politician Doctors and Practicing Physicians
The current COVID situation is now an all-out war between the Wall Street Big Pharma funded political doctors and their control over the corporate media, and the doctors on the front lines who are actually treating real patients.
Many of these REAL doctors are now, sadly, having to take time away from what they do best, which is treat their patients, and form groups to try and get the truth out about what they have actually learned about COVID in a clinical setting, as opposed to government-funded political “doctors” who make the rounds on TV and try to get studies published.
These practicing physicians are now forming their own groups to try and fight censorship as their numbers swell across the globe.
One of the most recent groups is The World Doctors Alliance.
An independent non-profit alliance of doctors, nurses, healthcare professionals and staff around the world who have united in the wake of the Covid-19 response chapter to share experiences with a view to ending all lockdowns and related damaging measures and to re-establish universal health determinance of psychological and physical wellbeing for all humanity. Open letter to the UK Government, Governments of the World and the Citizens of the World Total signatures so far: 22,208 General public: 19,208
Doctors, nurses, scientists, dentists, etc: 1,336
Holistic health practitioners: 1,664
The politician TV doctors claim they have “science” on their side, but that is only because they use their own definition of “science,” which really has nothing to do with “truth,” but AUTHORITY.
If you read or listen carefully to what they say, you will soon understand they just want the public to trust them because they are “doctors,” and claim to represent a consensus in the “scientific community.”
But if you do your own “fact checking” and search the medical and scientific literature yourself, which few do, it will become very obvious that they do not have the truth or facts on their side most of the time.
One of the most obvious examples currently affecting nearly everyone, is the belief that face masks will prevent disease and save lives.
The scientific literature states the exact opposite, and even studies, REAL studies, done on comparing operating rooms where surgeons where face masks to prevent infection, with surgeons who do not, show that the outcomes of hospital acquired infections are NOT affected by face masks, even though it is a general belief held by most. See:
and also:
So if the truth is that face masks do not protect us from COVID, and the science backs this up, how have so many people become convinced of just the opposite?
By using a political media doctor to tell everyone he/she is correct, based on his/her scientific credentials, and that everyone else who disagrees with them is wrong.
And scare the hell out of everyone in the process so they obey!
Here is a perfect example of that happening today from the New York Times, one of Big Pharma’s media properties:
The pandemic death toll could be lowered by next spring if more Americans wear masks, a new analysis finds.
In our day of information overload in the technology era, how many people will even click through and read this article, as opposed to just accepting it as true since, after all, it is the “New York Times”?
But if you do click through and try to find any real science to back up this very specific claim, you will easily see that this story belongs in the editorial section, and should NOT be published as “news.”
It is based on the opinion of one “medical doctor,” the “lead author,” who as far as I could research has never actually practiced medicine and treated patients, and it is based on a “predictive analysis” of the future, where he gets to control all the data inputs to achieve the desired result of what they want the public to believe.
This “analysis” also got published in one of their “scientific” publications to make it look more credible.
Universal mask use could prevent nearly 130,000 deaths from Covid-19, the illness caused by the coronavirus, in the United States through next spring, scientists reported on Friday. A surge of infections, driven in part by neglect of safety precautions, has begun to overwhelm hospitals in much of the nation. More than 75,000 new cases were reported in the United States on Thursday, the second-highest daily total nationwide since the pandemic began. Eight states set single-day case records. These numbers are likely to continue through the fall and winter, with a steady rise in cases and deaths until January and staying high after that point, said Christopher Murray, director of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington and lead author of the report. “We strongly believe we are heading into a pretty grim winter season,” Dr. Murray said. The new study, published in the journal Nature Medicine, also offered a rough estimate of the pandemic’s toll in the United States: perhaps 500,000 deaths by March 2021, even with social distancing mandates reinstated in most states. Other experts cautioned that, as with any model, the new estimates are based on many assumptions and should not be seen as predictions.
The key words here to get the public to buy into this are: “scientists,” “experts,” and of course the person quoted must have the “Dr.” in front of their name.
They also continue to use “new cases” to try and back up their claims, which just means someone got a positive test result for COVID whether they were sick or not.
They also use the common corporate media buzz words of “overwhelm hospitals” without mentioning any specific hospitals so this claim can be checked.
They also attack dissenting doctors, in this case Dr. Scott W. Atlas, who ironically is another political doctor but who does not support their narrative, and use Twitter to claim that Dr. Atlas is misleading people.
The findings follow an assertion by Dr. Scott W. Atlas, the president’s science adviser, that masks are ineffective, in a tweet later taken down by Twitter for spreading misinformation. On Wednesday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released new guidance recommending mask use in public settings, including public transportation.
The Corporate Media is Brainwashing People with Propaganda
I have been writing in the Alternative Health field for almost a decade now, and I am very well accustomed to the corporate media propaganda campaigns, and who funds them.
But forcing the public to do something that has no basis in the truth or science, and where literally hundreds of thousands of REAL doctors are now forming groups and telling the public the truth, is unprecedented.
I have never seen anything like this in my lifetime.
Is the Republic doomed? Are people really this blind, and this lazy to not do their own research to learn the truth?
See Also:
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-10-24--FDA Shows Their Depth of Corruption by Approving Remdesivir for COVID with No Solid Proof the Drug W

FDA Shows Their Depth of Corruption by Approving Remdesivir for COVID with No Solid Proof the Drug Works

It was announced today that the FDA has now fully approved remdesivir ( now called “ VEKLURY ” which already has a registered trademark , something that takes years to obtain generally ) as a treatment for COVID .
The path of getting remdesivir approved for use is one littered with corruption , and a process that has probably caused millions of deaths worldwide .
See our previous coverage : Was a False Hydroxychloroquine Narrative Created to Destroy the Competition for Gilead ’ s Remdesivir ?
Fauci ’ s Remdesivir Drug Fast-Tracked by FDA for Approval Exposed as a Fraud @ @ @ @ @ @ @ England Journal of Medicine : Pharmaceutical Companies are so Financially Powerful They Pressure us to Accept Papers Trump to do Full 5-Day Course of Remdesivir – Betrayal of Hydroxychloroquine Doctors ?
One of the interesting side shows to watch during COVID is Big Pharma fighting each other as they compete for a bigger slice of the pie in COVID Government funding which is currently around 6-7 TRILLION dollars .
We saw this earlier during the plandemic as many companies rushed to get COVID tests into the market .
There are currently over 100 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the FDA , and these companies have attacked each other regarding the validity of their tests to the point where the CEO of one Big Pharma firm stated about one of his competitor ’ s tests : “ Not Worth Anything – Two of us could do it Overnight in the Garage ” So with remdesivir being the first COVID treatment receiving full approval by the FDA today , as opposed to merely “ fast track ” approval for emergency use , others in the Pharmaceutical Industry who are also rushing to get @ @ @ @ @ @ @ point out the lack of science backing up any evidence of effectiveness of remdesivir .
As new COVID-19 cases spike in the U.S. , and ahead of an expected winter surge , the FDA just issued its first full approval for a drug to treat the disease—Gilead Sciences ’ Veklury , formerly known as remdesivir .
But the approval closely follows a large trial that showed no benefit for the therapy , and experts quickly questioned the FDA ’ s move .
Veklury won approval to treat COVID-19 requiring hospitalization in adults and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the FDA issued a new emergency use authorization for certain patients under 12 .
The agency approved the med based on late-stage trials showing Veklury is associated with an improved time to recovery and reduced disease progression in hospitalized patients , Gilead said .
Just last week , though , a large trial from the World Health Organization ( WHO ) cast doubts on the med ’ s efficacy .
WHO released preliminary results from a trial of 11,266 COVID-19 patients in 30 countries on one of four drug regimens , including Veklury @ @ @ @ @ @ @ little or no effect on hospitalized COVID-19 , ” the researchers wrote in a study posted ( PDF ) on the journal preprint site medRxiv .
Weighing in on the approval , two prominent doctors said the data don ’ t yet support the FDA ’ s decision .
The green light was “ astonishing , ” Peter Bach , director of Memorial Sloan Kettering ’ s Center for Health Policy and Outcomes , wrote on Twitter .
“ Of the three included studies , one lacked control , two lacked blinding , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of care , ” he wrote .
The results were mixed , he pointed out , and a randomized study larger than the three touted by the FDA combined was “ entirely negative.
” For his part , Eric Topol , M.D.
, director of the Scripps Research Translational Institute , wondered how the drug could get a full approval based on the “ mixed data.
” It ’ s unclear whether the med works early or late , and there ’ s still much “ unresolved , ” Topol wrote .
( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ course , was one of two experimental drugs that President Trump allegedly took that led to his “ miraculous ” cure from COVID , causing its stock to soar just when sales had slowed down .
See : Is Trump the Most Pro-Pharma President in History ?
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
It was announced today that the FDA has now fully approved remdesivir (now called “VEKLURY” which already has a registered trademark, something that takes years to obtain generally) as a treatment for COVID.
The path of getting remdesivir approved for use is one littered with corruption, and a process that has probably caused millions of deaths worldwide. See our previous coverage:
One of the interesting side shows to watch during COVID is Big Pharma fighting each other as they compete for a bigger slice of the pie in COVID Government funding which is currently around 6-7 TRILLION dollars.
We saw this earlier during the plandemic as many companies rushed to get COVID tests into the market. There are currently over 100 COVID tests that have been fast-tracked by the FDA, and these companies have attacked each other regarding the validity of their tests to the point where the CEO of one Big Pharma firm stated about one of his competitor’s tests:
More on COVID tests.
So with remdesivir being the first COVID treatment receiving full approval by the FDA today, as opposed to merely “fast track” approval for emergency use, others in the Pharmaceutical Industry who are also rushing to get COVID drugs to market were quick to point out the lack of science backing up any evidence of effectiveness of remdesivir.
Eric Sagonowsky, reporting for the Pharmaceutical trade publication Fierce Pharma wrote:
As new COVID-19 cases spike in the U.S., and ahead of an expected winter surge, the FDA just issued its first full approval for a drug to treat the disease—Gilead Sciences’ Veklury, formerly known as remdesivir. But the approval closely follows a large trial that showed no benefit for the therapy, and experts quickly questioned the FDA’s move. Veklury won approval to treat COVID-19 requiring hospitalization in adults and children 12 and older. Simultaneously, the FDA issued a new emergency use authorization for certain patients under 12. The agency approved the med based on late-stage trials showing Veklury is associated with an improved time to recovery and reduced disease progression in hospitalized patients, Gilead said. Just last week, though, a large trial from the World Health Organization (WHO) cast doubts on the med’s efficacy. WHO released preliminary results from a trial of 11,266 COVID-19 patients in 30 countries on one of four drug regimens, including Veklury. The medicine “appeared to have little or no effect on hospitalized COVID-19,” the researchers wrote in a study posted (PDF) on the journal preprint site medRxiv. Weighing in on the approval, two prominent doctors said the data don’t yet support the FDA’s decision. The green light was “astonishing,” Peter Bach, director of Memorial Sloan Kettering’s Center for Health Policy and Outcomes, wrote on Twitter. “Of the three included studies, one lacked control, two lacked blinding, all three lacked inclusion of current standard of care,” he wrote. The results were mixed, he pointed out, and a randomized study larger than the three touted by the FDA combined was “entirely negative.” For his part, Eric Topol, M.D., director of the Scripps Research Translational Institute, wondered how the drug could get a full approval based on the “mixed data.” It’s unclear whether the med works early or late, and there’s still much “unresolved,” Topol wrote. (Full article.)
Remdesivir, of course, was one of two experimental drugs that President Trump allegedly took that led to his “miraculous” cure from COVID, causing its stock to soar just when sales had slowed down. See:
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-10-25--The Path of Resistance is a Lonely One – Whom do you Fear?

In the opening chapter of the second book of the Bible , the book of Exodus , we have a record of the actions of two women who changed the course of human history , by defying their King ’ s orders .
Then the king of Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives , one of whom was named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah ; and he said , “ When you are helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool , if it is a son , then you shall put him @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a daughter , then she shall live.
” But the midwives feared God , and did not do as the king of Egypt had commanded them , but let the boys live .
So the king of Egypt called for the midwives and said to them , “ Why have you done this thing , and let the boys live ?
” The midwives said to Pharaoh , “ Because the Hebrew women are not as the Egyptian women ; for they are vigorous and give birth before the midwife can get to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the midwives , and the people multiplied , and became very mighty .
Because the midwives feared God , He established households for them .
( Exodus 1:15-21 ) The result of the midwives ’ resistance and refusal to obey the King ’ s edict , was that one of the baby boys who was spared was named “ Moses ” and went on to become a prophet of God and the leader of the Hebrews , delivering them from their bondage and slavery , and the one who met with God on @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and related laws were given for a new society .
The midwives themselves , who were apparently already leaders in the Egyptian culture and probably the head of a society or “ midwives guild ” that was used to assist in child births , were rewarded by God with “ established households.
” That may not seem like much in our own cultural way of thinking here in the 21st Century , but an “ established household ” in times of antiquity was something akin to a family dynasty or empire .
Abraham @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the Hebrews , had a “ household ” that at its height probably numbered well over 1000 people .
He literally had his own trained armed forces , and in Genesis 14 we read : So Abraham ’ s “ household ” defeated an army of four kings in battle .
The text in Exodus is not clear if the two women , Shiphrah and Puah , were themselves Hebrews , or just midwives who worked with the Hebrews in delivering their children .
We have no other trace of them in history @ @ @ @ @ @ @ names appear to be Semitic in origin , the Hebrews had been living in Egypt for hundreds of years by now , and undoubtedly the Egyptian languages at least had some Semitic influences .
The strongest argument in favor of the midwives being Egyptians ( Africans ) and not Hebrews is that it would have been unlikely that the King of Egypt would have asked Hebrews to murder their own babies .
There was no doubt racial prejudice present against the Hebrew slaves , and animosity towards the Hebrews from the Egyptian ruling @ @ @ @ @ @ @ also unreasonable to believe that only the Hebrews “ feared God , ” and not the Egyptians .
Hundreds of years earlier , at the end of the book of Genesis , the Hebrew Joseph was the leader of Egypt under the direction of the Egyptian King at that time , and both of them “ feared God ” by obeying his instructions to save the country from 7 years of famine .
Whom Do you Fear ?
Hundreds of years later , a new Hebrew King would rule over the Hebrew people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ King Solomon was recorded to be the wisest man to ever walk the earth : “ Now , O LORD my God , you have made your servant king in place of my father David .
But I am only a little child and do not know how to carry out my duties .
Your servant is here among the people you have chosen , a great people , too numerous to count or number .
So give your servant a discerning heart to govern your people and to distinguish between right and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ govern this great people of yours ?
” The Lord was pleased that Solomon had asked for this .
So God said to him , “ Since you have asked for this and not for long life or wealth for yourself , nor have asked for the death of your enemies but for discernment in administering justice , I will do what you have asked .
I will give you a wise and discerning heart , so that there will never have been anyone like you , nor will there ever be .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ you have not asked for—both riches and honor—so that in your lifetime you will have no equal among kings.
” ( 1 Kings 3:7-13 ) Then the fulfillment years later : So how did the wisest man of the world define “ wisdom ” ?
There is a whole book in the Bible dedicated to Solomon ’ s writings , the Book of Proverbs , and there he wrote : The proverbs of Solomon , son of David , king of Israel : To know wisdom and instruction , to understand words of @ @ @ @ @ @ @ dealing , in righteousness , justice , and equity ; to give prudence to the simple , knowledge and discretion to the youth— Let the wise hear and increase in learning , and the one who understands obtain guidance , to understand a proverb and a saying , the words of the wise and their riddles .
The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge ; fools despise wisdom and instruction .
( Proverbs 1:1-7 ) The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom , and knowledge of the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 9:10 ) The fear of the LORD adds length to life , but the years of the wicked are cut short .
( Proverbs 10:27 ) The fear of the LORD is a fountain of life , turning a man from the snares of death .
( Proverbs 14:27 ) Better a little with the fear of the LORD than great wealth with turmoil .
( Proverbs 15:16 ) The fear of the LORD teaches a man wisdom , and humility comes before honor .
( Proverbs 15:33 ) Through love and faithfulness @ @ @ @ @ @ @ fear of the LORD a man avoids evil .
( Proverbs 16:6 ) The fear of the LORD leads to life : Then one rests content , untouched by trouble .
( Proverbs 19:23 ) Humility and the fear of the LORD bring wealth and honor and life .
( Proverbs 22:4 ) Do not let your heart envy sinners , but always be zealous for the fear of the LORD .
( Proverbs 23:17 ) The opposite of the fear of the LORD is the fear of man .
The one man @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Solomon is Jesus Christ , the Son of God .
He said the same thing : I tell you , my friends , do not be afraid of those who kill the body and after that can do no more .
But I will show you whom you should fear : Fear him who , after the killing of the body , has power to throw you into hell .
Yes , I tell you , fear him .
Are not five sparrows sold for two pennies ?
Yet not one of them @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the very hairs of your head are all numbered .
Don ’ t be afraid ; you are worth more than many sparrows .
I tell you , whoever acknowledges me before men , the Son of Man will also acknowledge him before the angels of God .
But he who disowns me before men will be disowned before the angels of God .
( Luke 12:4-9 ) Two African women , Shiphrah and Puah , feared God more than they feared their king .
And the course of human history was forever @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Resist Today ?
Here in the United States today , we don ’ t have a single “ king , ” but we have many government authorities acting like they are kings , trying to impose their tyrannical decrees all in the name of a supposed “ pandemic.
” There is no doubt anymore that more people are suffering and dying due to the actions of these tyrants , than people being hurt and dying due to a virus .
And children are suffering the most , just as it has always been @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the only thing allowing them to continue their reign of terror , is a compliant public .
So far , at least , not enough people have chosen to resist , and fear God instead .
Many of the edicts and commands that have been issued in the name of COVID have their roots in Satanic practices , and quite obviously against the laws of God , and the teaching of the Bible .
One of the best ways Satan works through tyrants to impose his will and stop people from complying , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ covering one ’ s face .
There is power in assembling together .
Do not think for one second that Satan does not know this , and fear it !
God wants his people to assemble : To resist tyranny and go against the crowd is not easy .
But for the one who fears God more than man , that ’ s what we are called to do , even if it means giving up everything here on earth that we cherish and value , including our own family members who may @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a different direction .
Take special note of these words spoken by Jesus : So if you find yourself today disagreeing with almost everyone around you , if you are beginning to question your own sanity because it seems like the whole world is following the path to slavery and hell , take comfort in knowing that you are probably on the straight and narrow path that leads to life , because Jesus prophesied that there would not be many who would be willing to resist and go against the crowd .
Enter @ @ @ @ @ @ @ is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction , and many enter through it .
But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life , and only a few find it .
Watch out for false prophets .
They come to you in sheep ’ s clothing , but inwardly they are ferocious wolves .
By their fruit you will recognize them .
Do people pick grapes from thornbushes , or figs from thistles ?
Likewise every good tree bears good fruit , but a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ good tree can not bear bad fruit , and a bad tree can not bear good fruit .
Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire .
Thus , by their fruit you will recognize them .
Not everyone who says to me , ‘ Lord , Lord , ’ will enter the kingdom of heaven , but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven .
Many will say to me on that day , ‘ Lord , Lord @ @ @ @ @ @ @ name , and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles ?
’ Then I will tell them plainly , ‘ I never knew you .
Away from me , you evildoers !
’ ( Matthew 7:12-23 ) Comment on this article at Created4Health.org .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

The midwives, however, feared God and did not do what the king of Egypt had told them to do. (Exodus 1:17)
By Brian Shilhavy
In the opening chapter of the second book of the Bible, the book of Exodus, we have a record of the actions of two women who changed the course of human history, by defying their King’s orders.
Then the king of Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives, one of whom was named Shiphrah and the other was named Puah; and he said, “When you are helping the Hebrew women to give birth and see them upon the birthstool, if it is a son, then you shall put him to death; but if it is a daughter, then she shall live.” But the midwives feared God, and did not do as the king of Egypt had commanded them, but let the boys live. So the king of Egypt called for the midwives and said to them, “Why have you done this thing, and let the boys live?” The midwives said to Pharaoh, “Because the Hebrew women are not as the Egyptian women; for they are vigorous and give birth before the midwife can get to them.” So God was good to the midwives, and the people multiplied, and became very mighty. Because the midwives feared God, He established households for them. (Exodus 1:15-21)
The result of the midwives’ resistance and refusal to obey the King’s edict, was that one of the baby boys who was spared was named “Moses” and went on to become a prophet of God and the leader of the Hebrews, delivering them from their bondage and slavery, and the one who met with God on Mt. Sinai where the Ten Commandments and related laws were given for a new society.
The midwives themselves, who were apparently already leaders in the Egyptian culture and probably the head of a society or “midwives guild” that was used to assist in child births, were rewarded by God with “established households.”
That may not seem like much in our own cultural way of thinking here in the 21st Century, but an “established household” in times of antiquity was something akin to a family dynasty or empire.
Abraham, for example, the father of the Hebrews, had a “household” that at its height probably numbered well over 1000 people. He literally had his own trained armed forces, and in Genesis 14 we read:
When Abram heard that his relative had been taken captive, he called out the 318 trained men born in his household and went in pursuit as far as Dan. During the night Abram divided his men to attack them and he routed them, pursuing them as far as Hobah, north of Damascus. He recovered all the goods and brought back his relative Lot and his possessions, together with the women and the other people. (Genesis 14:14-16)
So Abraham’s “household” defeated an army of four kings in battle.
That’s quite a household!
The text in Exodus is not clear if the two women, Shiphrah and Puah, were themselves Hebrews, or just midwives who worked with the Hebrews in delivering their children. We have no other trace of them in history besides this text, and although their names appear to be Semitic in origin, the Hebrews had been living in Egypt for hundreds of years by now, and undoubtedly the Egyptian languages at least had some Semitic influences.
The strongest argument in favor of the midwives being Egyptians (Africans) and not Hebrews is that it would have been unlikely that the King of Egypt would have asked Hebrews to murder their own babies.
There was no doubt racial prejudice present against the Hebrew slaves, and animosity towards the Hebrews from the Egyptian ruling class at this time.
It is also unreasonable to believe that only the Hebrews “feared God,” and never the Egyptians. Hundreds of years earlier, at the end of the book of Genesis, the Hebrew Joseph was the leader of Egypt under the direction of the Egyptian King at that time, and both of them “feared God” by obeying his instructions to save the country from 7 years of famine.
Whom Do you Fear?
Hundreds of years later, a new Hebrew King would rule over the Hebrew people by the name of King Solomon.
King Solomon was recorded to be the wisest man to ever walk the earth:
“Now, O LORD my God, you have made your servant king in place of my father David. But I am only a little child and do not know how to carry out my duties. Your servant is here among the people you have chosen, a great people, too numerous to count or number. So give your servant a discerning heart to govern your people and to distinguish between right and wrong. For who is able to govern this great people of yours?” The Lord was pleased that Solomon had asked for this. So God said to him, “Since you have asked for this and not for long life or wealth for yourself, nor have asked for the death of your enemies but for discernment in administering justice, I will do what you have asked. I will give you a wise and discerning heart, so that there will never have been anyone like you, nor will there ever be. Moreover, I will give you what you have not asked for—both riches and honor—so that in your lifetime you will have no equal among kings.” (1 Kings 3:7-13)
Then the fulfillment years later:
God gave Solomon wisdom and very great insight, and a breadth of understanding as measureless as the sand on the seashore. Solomon’s wisdom was greater than the wisdom of all the men of the East, and greater than all the wisdom of Egypt. He was wiser than any other man, including Ethan the Ezrahite—wiser than Heman, Calcol and Darda, the sons of Mahol. And his fame spread to all the surrounding nations. He spoke three thousand proverbs and his songs numbered a thousand and five. He described plant life, from the cedar of Lebanon to the hyssop that grows out of walls. He also taught about animals and birds, reptiles and fish. Men of all nations came to listen to Solomon’s wisdom, sent by all the kings of the world, who had heard of his wisdom. (1 Kings 4:29-34)
So how did the wisest man of the world define “wisdom”?
There is a whole book in the Bible dedicated to Solomon’s writings, the Book of Proverbs, and there he wrote:
The proverbs of Solomon, son of David, king of Israel: To know wisdom and instruction, to understand words of insight, to receive instruction in wise dealing, in righteousness, justice, and equity; to give prudence to the simple, knowledge and discretion to the youth— Let the wise hear and increase in learning, and the one who understands obtain guidance, to understand a proverb and a saying, the words of the wise and their riddles. The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge; fools despise wisdom and instruction. (Proverbs 1:1-7) The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom, and knowledge of the Holy One is understanding. (Proverbs 9:10) The fear of the LORD adds length to life, but the years of the wicked are cut short. (Proverbs 10:27) The fear of the LORD is a fountain of life, turning a man from the snares of death. (Proverbs 14:27) Better a little with the fear of the LORD than great wealth with turmoil. (Proverbs 15:16) The fear of the LORD teaches a man wisdom, and humility comes before honor. (Proverbs 15:33) Through love and faithfulness sin is atoned for; through the fear of the LORD a man avoids evil. (Proverbs 16:6) The fear of the LORD leads to life: Then one rests content, untouched by trouble. (Proverbs 19:23) Humility and the fear of the LORD bring wealth and honor and life. (Proverbs 22:4) Do not let your heart envy sinners, but always be zealous for the fear of the LORD. (Proverbs 23:17)
The opposite of the fear of the LORD is the fear of man.
Fear of man will prove to be a snare, but whoever trusts in the LORD is kept safe. (Proverbs 29:25)
The one man who can claim to be wiser than Solomon is Jesus Christ, the Son of God. He said the same thing:
I tell you, my friends, do not be afraid of those who kill the body and after that can do no more. But I will show you whom you should fear: Fear him who, after the killing of the body, has power to throw you into hell. Yes, I tell you, fear him. Are not five sparrows sold for two pennies? Yet not one of them is forgotten by God. Indeed, the very hairs of your head are all numbered. Don’t be afraid; you are worth more than many sparrows. I tell you, whoever acknowledges me before men, the Son of Man will also acknowledge him before the angels of God. But he who disowns me before men will be disowned before the angels of God. (Luke 12:4-9)
Two African women, Shiphrah and Puah, feared God more than they feared their king.
And the course of human history was forever changed.
Who Will Fear God and Resist Today?
Here in the United States today, we don’t have a single “king,” but we have many government authorities acting like they are kings, trying to impose their tyrannical decrees all in the name of a supposed “pandemic.”
There is no doubt anymore that more people are suffering and dying due to the actions of these tyrants, than people being hurt and dying due to a virus.
And children are suffering the most, just as it has always been throughout history when tyrants rule.
But the only thing allowing them to continue their reign of terror, is a compliant public. So far, at least, not enough people have chosen to resist, and fear God instead.
Many of the edicts and commands that have been issued in the name of COVID have their roots in Satanic practices, and quite obviously against the laws of God, and the teaching of the Bible.
One of the best ways Satan works through tyrants to impose his will and stop people from gathering together, is through social isolation, which includes covering one’s face.
But Jesus said:
I tell you the truth, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven. Again, I tell you that if two of you on earth agree about anything you ask for, it will be done for you by my Father in heaven. For where two or three come together in my name, there am I with them. (Matthew 18:18-20)
There is power in assembling together. Do not think for one second that Satan does not know this, and fear it!
God wants his people to assemble:
Let us hold unswervingly to the hope we profess, for he who promised is faithful. And let us consider how we may spur one another on toward love and good deeds. Let us not give up meeting together, as some are in the habit of doing, but let us encourage one another—and all the more as you see the Day approaching. (Hebrews 10:23-25)
To resist tyranny and go against the crowd is not easy. But for the one who fears God more than man, that’s what we are called to do, even if it means giving up everything here on earth that we cherish and value, including our own family members who may choose to go their own way in a different direction.
Take special note of these words spoken by Jesus:
Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to turn a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law— a man’s enemies will be the members of his own household. Anyone who loves his father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; anyone who loves his son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me; and anyone who does not take his cross and follow me is not worthy of me. Whoever finds his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for my sake will find it. (Matthew 10:34-39)
So if you find yourself today disagreeing with almost everyone around you, if you are beginning to question your own sanity because it seems like the whole world is following the path to slavery and hell, take comfort in knowing that you are probably on the straight and narrow path that leads to life, because Jesus prophesied that there would not be many who would be willing to resist and go against the crowd.
Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it. Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? Likewise every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them. Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?’ Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’
(Matthew 7:12-23)
Comment on this article at Created4Health.org.
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-10-26--NYC Families Unable to Have Kids Log into Online Classes Fear Being Reported to Child Services for T

NYC Families Unable to Have Kids Log into Online Classes Fear Being Reported to Child Services for Truancy

By Noah Goldberg and Michael Elsen-Rooney New York Daily News Some New York City students who ’ ve missed too many remote classes because of faulty devices and unreliable internet are being threatened with having child services notified , parents and advocates told the Daily News .
At least two parents say their children are being unfairly targeted for virtual absences stemming from circumstances outside their control , including malfunctioning city-issued iPads and spotty internet in city homeless shelters .
South Bronx mom Regina Alston ’ s two Education Department iPads have been on the fritz with a repair request @ @ @ @ @ @ @ elementary school kids to share a single laptop and miss classes when the siblings ’ schedules overlap .
But she said that even after she alerted officials at Grant Ave .
Elementary school about the issue , an administrator this week warned Alston ’ s 9-year-old daughter the school would have to alert child services if her virtual absences continued , the furious mother said .
Alston was particularly incensed that the school administrator raised the issue with her daughter instead of her .
Read the full article at New York Daily News @ @ @ @ @ @ @ problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed Medical Kidnapping : A Threat to Every Family in America T-Shirt See : Medical Kidnapping : A Threat to Every Family in America Today Help spread the awareness of Medical Kidnapping by wearing the Medical Kidnapping t-shirt !
Support the cause of MedicalKidnap.com , which is part of the Health Impact News network .
Support the cause against Medical Kidnapping by purchasing our new book !
If you know people who are skeptical and can not @ @ @ @ @ @ @ U.S. today , this is the book for them !
Backed with solid references and real life examples , they will not be able to deny the plain evidence before them , and will become better educated on this topic that is destroying the American family .
2 Books Retail : $ 49.98 ( for 2 books ) FREE Shipping Available !
Now : $ 19.99 ( for 2 books ) Order here !

By Noah Goldberg and Michael Elsen-Rooney
New York Daily News
Excerpts:
Some New York City students who’ve missed too many remote classes because of faulty devices and unreliable internet are being threatened with having child services notified, parents and advocates told the Daily News.
At least two parents say their children are being unfairly targeted for virtual absences stemming from circumstances outside their control, including malfunctioning city-issued iPads and spotty internet in city homeless shelters.
South Bronx mom Regina Alston’s two Education Department iPads have been on the fritz with a repair request pending for months, forcing her two elementary school kids to share a single laptop and miss classes when the siblings’ schedules overlap.
But she said that even after she alerted officials at Grant Ave. Elementary school about the issue, an administrator this week warned Alston’s 9-year-old daughter the school would have to alert child services if her virtual absences continued, the furious mother said.
“I’m angry,” Alston fumed. “I think the DOE is trying to put the fault on the parents, but it’s not. This whole remote learning is an epic failure.”
Alston was particularly incensed that the school administrator raised the issue with her daughter instead of her.
“Why would you threaten a 9-year-old with child services?” Alston fumed. “Child services should never even be a conversation to have with a 9-year-old.”
Read the full article at New York Daily News
Comment on this article at MedicalKidnap.com
See Also:
Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through
Medical Kidnapping: A Threat to Every Family in America T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton!
Order here!
Medical Kidnapping is REAL!
See: Medical Kidnapping: A Threat to Every Family in America Today
Help spread the awareness of Medical Kidnapping by wearing the Medical Kidnapping t-shirt!
Support the cause of MedicalKidnap.com, which is part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!
Support the cause against Medical Kidnapping by purchasing our new book!
If you know people who are skeptical and cannot believe that medical kidnapping happens in the U.S. today, this is the book for them! Backed with solid references and real life examples, they will not be able to deny the plain evidence before them, and will become better educated on this topic that is destroying the American family.
1 Book – 228 pages
Retail: $24.99
FREE Shipping Available!
Now: $14.99
Order here!
2 Books
Retail: $49.98 (for 2 books)
FREE Shipping Available!
Now: $19.99 (for 2 books)
Order here!


healthimpactnews--2020-10-26--Washington D.C. Bill Allows Children 11 Years and Older to be Vaccinated Without Parental Knowledge

DC Bill B23-0171 Allowing Children 11 Years and Older to Be Vaccinated Without Parental Knowledge or Consent Advances On Oct. 7 , 2020 , during a hastily scheduled virtual meeting,1 four District of Columbia Council members making up the Health Committee2 amended and unanimously passed a minor consent bill , B23-0171.3 The bill would not only permit children aged 11 years and older to give consent for doctors and other vaccine administrators to give them vaccines without their parents ’ knowledge or consent , but would also require insurance companies , vaccine administrators and schools to conceal from parents that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Oct. 20 , 2020,4 the entire DC Council voted in favor of the bill 12:15 on the first reading in yet another virtual online meeting6 with no public testimony .
It was announced that the second reading , which will be the final vote , will take place on Nov. 10 , 2020.7 Committee Chair and Bill Sponsor Admit “ Imminent ” COVID-19 Vaccine Is Reason for Sudden Push to Eliminate Parental Rights NVIC issued an alert8 through the online NVIC Advocacy Portal when the bill had it ’ s first public hearing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the bill , which violated parental medical informed consent rights .
Testimony was taken,9 and NVIC submitted testimony against the bill.10 B23-0171 then sat for over a year untouched and unmoved .
In a revealing statement Vincent C. Gray ( D-Ward 7 ) , the chair of the DC Health Committee which passed the bill , explained why the bill was all suddenly being revived and pushed through so quickly .
Gray was quoted in The Washington Post as saying , Primary sponsor of this bill , DC Council Member Mary Cheh ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccines were her the main reason why she wants to remove parents from the process of vaccinating children .
Advocating for passage of her bill , she stated : If this bill passes , it is clear that minor children will be at risk of being pressured and coerced into getting a COVID-19 vaccine behind their parents ’ back once it is available and added by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices ( ACIP ) to the childhood vaccine schedule recommended by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control ( CDC ) .
Violation @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and Parental Rights B23-0171 permits minor children 11 years and older to consent to any vaccine recommended by ACIP without a parent ’ s knowledge or consent ( bill lines 27-30 ) .
Federal legislative history provides evidence that Congress never intended for a minor child to make decisions to get a vaccine without parents ’ knowledge or consent .
When the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 198613 was passed , the Act clearly stated that before the administration of vaccines14 to a child , a health care provider shall give a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ information materials to the , “ parent or legal representative of any child to whom the provider intends to administer such vaccine… ” The CDC confirms that there is a requirement that their Vaccine Information Statement ( VIS ) is provided to the parent/legal guardian prior to vaccination of a minor child on their VIS Q & A page.15 Under the question , “ Is there a requirement to verify that parents/legal representatives have actually received and reviewed the VIS , ” the answer is a clear “ YES ” .
These requirements @ @ @ @ @ @ @ be educated with CDC materials prior to their minor child being vaccinated will not be met if a child is allowed to make these decisions on their own .
The United States Supreme Court has recognized the right of parents to be an active and integral part of their children ’ s lives as “ perhaps the oldest of the fundamental liberty interests recognized by [ the Supreme ] Court.
” Troxel v. Granville , 530 U.S. 57 ( U.S. 2000 ) 16 B23-0171 Endangers the Health and Well Being of Children A @ @ @ @ @ @ @ an adult parent to understand personal and family medical history , including vaccine reactions , allergies , and autoimmune or neurological disorders .
Children do not have the same kind of critical thinking skills or emotional maturity required to make a well-informed vaccine benefit-risk decision compared to an adult .
Vaccines can cause injury and death as evidenced by the creation of a federally operated Vaccine Injury Compensation Program ( VICP ) , which has paid out over $ 4.4 billion dollars to vaccine victims.17 If a child consents to vaccination without their @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the parent may not recognize vaccine reaction symptoms and the reason for their child ’ s sudden personality change and decline in physical , mental or emotional health , and this lack of knowledge could be life threatening for the child .
The parent ’ s lack of knowledge about the fact that their child was given vaccines that carry a risk of injury or death may well prevent the parent from seeking immediate medical care .
Under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act18 Congress gave partial liability protection to vaccine manufacturers in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine administrators liability protection from vaccine injury lawsuits in 1987 .
In 2011 , the U.S. Supreme Court judges in Bruesewitz et al v. Wyeth et al19 affirmed that government licensed and recommended childhood vaccines were “ unavoidably unsafe ” and effectively removed all remaining liability from vaccine manufacturers .
Today , pharmaceutical companies making and selling vaccines and doctors and other vaccine administrators have no legal accountability or financial liability in civil court when a mandated vaccine causes permanent injury or death .
There is no justification for the state to eliminate @ @ @ @ @ @ @ right to make an informed benefit and risk decision about vaccination on behalf of a minor child , especially when doctors and other vaccine providers have no liability or accountability for what happens to the child after vaccination .
B23-0171 compels schools ( bill lines 52-54 ) to conceal vaccine administration from parents , whose children give consent to receive vaccinations on their own , even when their parents have already declined one or more vaccines for health risk reasons or have filed a religious vaccine exemption .
FERPA , 34 CFR § @ @ @ @ @ @ @ have access to their children ’ s education records .
The definition of “ education records ” include health and vaccine records at the K-12 level22 .
While B23-0171 blocks parents from getting access to their child ’ s vaccination status , the bill does permit schools to share the child ’ s vaccination record with the DC Department of Health or the school-based health center ( bill lines 53-54 ) .
This is also in conflict with FERPA because 34 CFR §99.30 requires prior written parental consent before personally identifiable information ( @ @ @ @ @ @ @ requires schools to provide copies of those records disclosed.23 While FERPA does allow for release of PII under the health and safety emergency exception , the release of information that personally identifies the student is extremely limited.24 Granting vaccine providers the ability to vaccinate children in the absence of parental consent conflicts with the already codified religious exemption rights of parents .
There are other serious legal issues creating the potential for criminal violations and civil liability lawsuits : the bill requires vaccine providers and insurers to conceal the fact that the child @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of official medical records by vaccine administrators .
The bill ( lines 37-41 ) requires providers to seek reimbursement from the parent ’ s insurance company but prohibits insurers from sending an Explanation of Benefits .
Lines 48-52 requires a health care provider to leave part of the immunization record blank concealing from the parent the fact that their own child was given vaccines .
DC Vaccine Bill Part of the Dangerous Agenda To Remove Parents From Vaccination Decisions for Minor Children Congress held two vaccine hearings on Feb. 2726 and Mar .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ focused on vaccine hesitancy , pitted children against their parents .
Veteran vaccine safety and informed consent advocates with decades of experience , including time spent serving as consumer representatives on federal advisory committees , were denied the ability to testify .
However , a teenager , who had no expertise in the area of vaccine safety and law and whose only experience related to the subject being discussed was recently criticizing his mother on social media28 for not vaccinating him , was invited to testify.29 After the hearing , the mainstream media @ @ @ @ @ @ @ concept of doctors being given the power to convince minor children to receive vaccines without their parents ’ consent , often quoting the teen ’ s testimony as justification for why parents should be cut out of the vaccination process for their minor children.30 Medical trade groups representing liability-free vaccine administrators also endorsed the concept of giving children liability free vaccines without parental consent .
Doctors , who are frustrated with having to spend time talking with educated parents about vaccines , have identified minor consent as a way to coerce children into @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Pre-adolescents and teenagers are vulnerable to peer and authority-figure persuasion .
An opinion piece expressing support for removing parental informed consent rights was published in the New England Journal of Medicine , 31 and the American Medical Association passed a resolution supporting state laws to allow minors to consent to vaccination.32 This coordinated effort resulted in 13 minor consent bills being introduced in state legislatures in 2019 , and there was a big jump to 21 similar bills being introduced in 2020 .
Legislators listened to parents and rejected a total of 33 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ 2020 .
The DC minor consent bill in is the only one moving.33 What Happens if the Bill Passes on November 10th ?
If the bill passes a second reading in the City Council , it goes to the DC Mayor Muriel Bowser , who has up to 10 days to sign the bill , let it go into effect without her signature , or veto it .
If Mayor Bowser vetoes the bill , the City Council can override the veto by a two-thirds vote .
The final step before becoming law @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate for a period of 30 days before becoming effective as law .
During this period of review , the U.S. Congress may enact into law a joint resolution disapproving and negating the legislation .
If , during the review period , the President of the United States approves a joint resolution by Congress disapproving the DC legislation , it will be prevented from becoming law .
If , however , upon the expiration of the congressional review period , no joint resolution @ @ @ @ @ @ @ been approved by the President , the bill finally becomes a law and is assigned a law number.34 Litigation is also likely if the DC Council passes B23-0171 .
In an Oct. 21 , 2020 update by ParentalRights.org , “ DC Council Would Discard Constitution , End Parents ’ Rights , ” Executive Director Michael Ramey asserts this bill is contrary to the U.S. Constitution and lays out existing U.S. Supreme Court precedent to back this up .
He says , What Can People Do To Help Defeat This Legislation ?
Families living @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the District of Columbia should contact all thirteen members of the DC Council36 and tell them to Vote NO on B23-0171 in the second and final reading .
Specific directions , talking points , and contact information is published in the alert on the NVIC Advocacy Portal .
Everyone else can help get this information to people they know in DC .
NVIC anticipates that there will be similar minor consent bills filed in other states in 2021 .
Registered users of the free online NVIC Advocacy Portal will receive action alerts with @ @ @ @ @ @ @ this one are introduced in 2021 so they can take action in their own states to protect their informed consent rights .
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

DC Bill B23-0171 Allowing Children 11 Years and Older to Be Vaccinated Without Parental Knowledge or Consent Advances
by Dawn Richardson
The Vaccine Reaction
On Oct. 7, 2020, during a hastily scheduled virtual meeting,1 four District of Columbia Council members making up the Health Committee2 amended and unanimously passed a minor consent bill, B23-0171.3
The bill would not only permit children aged 11 years and older to give consent for doctors and other vaccine administrators to give them vaccines without their parents’ knowledge or consent, but would also require insurance companies, vaccine administrators and schools to conceal from parents that the child has been vaccinated.
On Oct. 20, 2020,4 the entire DC Council voted in favor of the bill 12:15 on the first reading in yet another virtual online meeting6 with no public testimony. It was announced that the second reading, which will be the final vote, will take place on Nov. 10, 2020.7
Committee Chair and Bill Sponsor Admit “Imminent” COVID-19 Vaccine Is Reason for Sudden Push to Eliminate Parental Rights
NVIC issued an alert8 through the online NVIC Advocacy Portal when the bill had it’s first public hearing in June of 2019 advising opposition to the bill, which violated parental medical informed consent rights.
Testimony was taken,9 and NVIC submitted testimony against the bill.10
B23-0171 then sat for over a year untouched and unmoved.
In a revealing statement Vincent C. Gray (D-Ward 7), the chair of the DC Health Committee which passed the bill, explained why the bill was all suddenly being revived and pushed through so quickly.
Gray was quoted in The Washington Post as saying,
“the hope of an imminent coronavirus vaccine gave the bill new urgency.”11
Primary sponsor of this bill, DC Council Member Mary Cheh (D-Ward 3), emphasized that coronavirus vaccines were her the main reason why she wants to remove parents from the process of vaccinating children.
Advocating for passage of her bill, she stated:
And given our ongoing pandemic and the incredible work being done to develop a COVID-19 vaccine, it’s more important than ever I think that we reduce any and all barriers to these treatments and this legislation aims to do just that by increasing access to vaccines for minors who choose to get vaccinated but have not been unable to do so.12
If this bill passes, it is clear that minor children will be at risk of being pressured and coerced into getting a COVID-19 vaccine behind their parents’ back once it is available and added by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) to the childhood vaccine schedule recommended by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) .
Violation of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and Parental Rights
B23-0171 permits minor children 11 years and older to consent to any vaccine recommended by ACIP without a parent’s knowledge or consent (bill lines 27-30).
Federal legislative history provides evidence that Congress never intended for a minor child to make decisions to get a vaccine without parents’ knowledge or consent. When the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 198613 was passed, the Act clearly stated that before the administration of vaccines14 to a child, a health care provider shall give a copy of the CDC’s vaccine information materials to the, “parent or legal representative of any child to whom the provider intends to administer such vaccine…”
The CDC confirms that there is a requirement that their Vaccine Information Statement (VIS) is provided to the parent/legal guardian prior to vaccination of a minor child on their VIS Q&A page.15
Under the question, “Is there a requirement to verify that parents/legal representatives have actually received and reviewed the VIS,” the answer is a clear “YES”.
These requirements under federal law for a parent to be educated with CDC materials prior to their minor child being vaccinated will not be met if a child is allowed to make these decisions on their own.
The United States Supreme Court has recognized the right of parents to be an active and integral part of their children’s lives as “perhaps the oldest of the fundamental liberty interests recognized by [the Supreme] Court.” Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (U.S. 2000)16
B23-0171 Endangers the Health and Well Being of Children
A minor child is far less likely than an adult parent to understand personal and family medical history, including vaccine reactions, allergies, and autoimmune or neurological disorders.
Children do not have the same kind of critical thinking skills or emotional maturity required to make a well-informed vaccine benefit-risk decision compared to an adult.
Vaccines can cause injury and death as evidenced by the creation of a federally operated Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), which has paid out over $4.4 billion dollars to vaccine victims.17
If a child consents to vaccination without their parent knowledge and has a reaction, the parent may not recognize vaccine reaction symptoms and the reason for their child’s sudden personality change and decline in physical, mental or emotional health, and this lack of knowledge could be life threatening for the child.
The parent’s lack of knowledge about the fact that their child was given vaccines that carry a risk of injury or death may well prevent the parent from seeking immediate medical care.
Under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act18 Congress gave partial liability protection to vaccine manufacturers in 1986 and then added an amendment giving vaccine administrators liability protection from vaccine injury lawsuits in 1987.
In 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court judges in Bruesewitz et al v. Wyeth et al19 affirmed that government licensed and recommended childhood vaccines were “unavoidably unsafe” and effectively removed all remaining liability from vaccine manufacturers.
Today, pharmaceutical companies making and selling vaccines and doctors and other vaccine administrators have no legal accountability or financial liability in civil court when a mandated vaccine causes permanent injury or death.
There is no justification for the state to eliminate a parent’s legal and moral right to make an informed benefit and risk decision about vaccination on behalf of a minor child, especially when doctors and other vaccine providers have no liability or accountability for what happens to the child after vaccination.
Violates Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)20
B23-0171 compels schools (bill lines 52-54) to conceal vaccine administration from parents, whose children give consent to receive vaccinations on their own, even when their parents have already declined one or more vaccines for health risk reasons or have filed a religious vaccine exemption.
FERPA, 34 CFR § 99.1021, guarantees parents the right to have access to their children’s education records. The definition of “education records” include health and vaccine records at the K-12 level22.
While B23-0171 blocks parents from getting access to their child’s vaccination status, the bill does permit schools to share the child’s vaccination record with the DC Department of Health or the school-based health center (bill lines 53-54).
This is also in conflict with FERPA because 34 CFR §99.30 requires prior written parental consent before personally identifiable information (PII) is disclosed to others and requires schools to provide copies of those records disclosed.23
While FERPA does allow for release of PII under the health and safety emergency exception, the release of information that personally identifies the student is extremely limited.24
Bill Conflicts With Religious Exemption, Requires Falsification of Records
Section 5300.11 of the DC Municipal Regulations states,
“The immunization requirements subject to this Chapter, shall not apply to any student whose parent or guardian objects in writing to the immunization on grounds that the medical treatment or medical test is forbidden by their religion or religious beliefs and practices25.”
Granting vaccine providers the ability to vaccinate children in the absence of parental consent conflicts with the already codified religious exemption rights of parents.
There are other serious legal issues creating the potential for criminal violations and civil liability lawsuits: the bill requires vaccine providers and insurers to conceal the fact that the child was vaccinated and it requires the falsification of official medical records by vaccine administrators.
The bill (lines 37-41) requires providers to seek reimbursement from the parent’s insurance company but prohibits insurers from sending an Explanation of Benefits. Lines 48-52 requires a health care provider to leave part of the immunization record blank concealing from the parent the fact that their own child was given vaccines.
DC Vaccine Bill Part of the Dangerous Agenda To Remove Parents From Vaccination Decisions for Minor Children
Congress held two vaccine hearings on Feb. 2726 and Mar. 5, 2019.27 The hearings, which focused on vaccine hesitancy, pitted children against their parents.
Veteran vaccine safety and informed consent advocates with decades of experience, including time spent serving as consumer representatives on federal advisory committees, were denied the ability to testify.
However, a teenager, who had no expertise in the area of vaccine safety and law and whose only experience related to the subject being discussed was recently criticizing his mother on social media28 for not vaccinating him, was invited to testify.29
After the hearing, the mainstream media published multiple similar articles promoting the ill-conceived concept of doctors being given the power to convince minor children to receive vaccines without their parents’ consent, often quoting the teen’s testimony as justification for why parents should be cut out of the vaccination process for their minor children.30
Medical trade groups representing liability-free vaccine administrators also endorsed the concept of giving children liability free vaccines without parental consent.
Doctors, who are frustrated with having to spend time talking with educated parents about vaccines, have identified minor consent as a way to coerce children into consenting to vaccines on their own.
Pre-adolescents and teenagers are vulnerable to peer and authority-figure persuasion. An opinion piece expressing support for removing parental informed consent rights was published in the New England Journal of Medicine, 31 and the American Medical Association passed a resolution supporting state laws to allow minors to consent to vaccination.32
This coordinated effort resulted in 13 minor consent bills being introduced in state legislatures in 2019, and there was a big jump to 21 similar bills being introduced in 2020.
Legislators listened to parents and rejected a total of 33 minor consent bills filed in 2019 and 2020. The DC minor consent bill in is the only one moving.33
What Happens if the Bill Passes on November 10th?
If the bill passes a second reading in the City Council, it goes to the DC Mayor Muriel Bowser, who has up to 10 days to sign the bill, let it go into effect without her signature, or veto it. If Mayor Bowser vetoes the bill, the City Council can override the veto by a two-thirds vote.
The final step before becoming law is the bill must be sent to the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate for a period of 30 days before becoming effective as law.
During this period of review, the U.S. Congress may enact into law a joint resolution disapproving and negating the legislation.
If, during the review period, the President of the United States approves a joint resolution by Congress disapproving the DC legislation, it will be prevented from becoming law.
If, however, upon the expiration of the congressional review period, no joint resolution disapproving the Council’s Act has been approved by the President, the bill finally becomes a law and is assigned a law number.34
Litigation is also likely if the DC Council passes B23-0171. In an Oct. 21, 2020 update by ParentalRights.org, “DC Council Would Discard Constitution, End Parents’ Rights,” Executive Director Michael Ramey asserts this bill is contrary to the U.S. Constitution and lays out existing U.S. Supreme Court precedent to back this up. He says,
“For nearly 100 years, consistent Supreme Court precedent has held that parents have both the duty and the right to direct the care, custody, and control of their minor children.”35
What Can People Do To Help Defeat This Legislation?
Families living or sending their children to school in the District of Columbia should contact all thirteen members of the DC Council36 and tell them to Vote NO on B23-0171 in the second and final reading. Specific directions, talking points, and contact information is published in the alert on the NVIC Advocacy Portal.
Everyone else can help get this information to people they know in DC. NVIC anticipates that there will be similar minor consent bills filed in other states in 2021.
Registered users of the free online NVIC Advocacy Portal will receive action alerts with talking points when vaccine related bills like this one are introduced in 2021 so they can take action in their own states to protect their informed consent rights.
Read the full article TheVaccineReaction.org.
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.
References
See Also: