healthimpactnews--2020-09-21--Study: Proper Levels of Vitamin D will Prevent COVID – Vaccine not Needed

Dr. Michael Holick , professor of medicine , physiology and biophysics at Boston University School of Medicine , is an expert on Vitamin D , and we have featured his work on Health Impact News in the past .
Much of Dr. Holick ’ s previous work on Vitamin D has been in the area of “ brittle bone ” diseases , which often lead to false charges of Shaken Baby Syndrome and wrongly accusing parents of committing child abuse based on radiology reports showing bone fractures that have healed in young children , who are basically Vitamin D deficient @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Holick and his associates looked at samples from Quest Diagnostics of more than 190,000 Americans from all 50 states and found that those who had deficient levels of vitamin D had 54 % higher COVID positivity compared to those with adequate levels of vitamin D in the blood .
The Boston Herald reported on the study : Stop waiting for a miracle drug : A Boston University doctor says a sufficient amount of vitamin D can cut the risk of catching coronavirus by 54 % .
“ People have been looking for the @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and not looking for something this simple , ” said Dr. Michael Holick , professor of medicine , physiology and biophysics at Boston University School of Medicine .
Holick and his colleagues studied blood samples from Quest Diagnostics of more than 190,000 Americans from all 50 states and found that those who had deficient levels of vitamin D had 54 % higher COVID positivity compared to those with adequate levels of vitamin D in the blood .
The risk of getting coronavirus continued to decline as vitamin D levels increased , the study @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Science One peer-reviewed journal shows .
“ The higher your vitamin D status , lower was your risk , ” Holick said .
Many people are vitamin D-deficient because there are only small amounts in food , Holick said .
Most vitamin D comes from sun exposure and many are deprived , especially during winter months .
But the sunshine vitamin is easy to find and relatively cheap in drug stores , and taking vitamin D pills comes at no risk .
“ It ’ s perfectly safe , ” Holick said .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ , by many , the nutrient of the decade , ” Holick said .
COVID-19 positivity is strongly associated with vitamin D levels in the blood , a relationship that stayed the same across different races , sexes and age ranges , the study states .
( Read the full article . )
So now we can add Vitamin D to the list of simple , effective cures for SARS-CoV-2 , joining hydroxychloroquine , Vitamin C , ozone treatment , among others .
Of course Big Pharma and the government health dictators will @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the ramifications for their effectiveness would prove they are criminals and mass murderers , and that a COVID vaccine and new COVID drugs are just simply not needed .
Then they would have to give the government back their $ 1 TRILLION + in funding to develop these drugs and treatments , and face charges in a court of law for mass murder by preventing these treatments , and attacking doctors who use them to save patients ’ lives .
Real cures are just simply not profitable for Big Pharma and their Wall @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and they can not be allowed .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Dr. Michael Holick, professor of medicine, physiology and biophysics at Boston University School of Medicine, is an expert on Vitamin D, and we have featured his work on Health Impact News in the past.
Much of Dr. Holick’s previous work on Vitamin D has been in the area of “brittle bone” diseases, which often lead to false charges of Shaken Baby Syndrome and wrongly accusing parents of committing child abuse based on radiology reports showing bone fractures that have healed in young children, who are basically Vitamin D deficient.
A recent study conducted by Dr. Holick and his associates looked at samples from Quest Diagnostics of more than 190,000 Americans from all 50 states and found that those who had deficient levels of vitamin D had 54% higher COVID positivity compared to those with adequate levels of vitamin D in the blood.
The Boston Herald reported on the study:
Stop waiting for a miracle drug: A Boston University doctor says a sufficient amount of vitamin D can cut the risk of catching coronavirus by 54%. “People have been looking for the magic drug or waiting for the vaccine and not looking for something this simple,” said Dr. Michael Holick, professor of medicine, physiology and biophysics at Boston University School of Medicine. Holick and his colleagues studied blood samples from Quest Diagnostics of more than 190,000 Americans from all 50 states and found that those who had deficient levels of vitamin D had 54% higher COVID positivity compared to those with adequate levels of vitamin D in the blood. The risk of getting coronavirus continued to decline as vitamin D levels increased, the study, published in the Public Library of Science One peer-reviewed journal shows. “The higher your vitamin D status, lower was your risk,” Holick said. Many people are vitamin D-deficient because there are only small amounts in food, Holick said. Most vitamin D comes from sun exposure and many are deprived, especially during winter months. But the sunshine vitamin is easy to find and relatively cheap in drug stores, and taking vitamin D pills comes at no risk. “It’s perfectly safe,” Holick said. “It’s considered to be, by many, the nutrient of the decade,” Holick said. COVID-19 positivity is strongly associated with vitamin D levels in the blood, a relationship that stayed the same across different races, sexes and age ranges, the study states. (Read the full article.)
So now we can add Vitamin D to the list of simple, effective cures for SARS-CoV-2, joining hydroxychloroquine, Vitamin C, ozone treatment, among others.
Of course Big Pharma and the government health dictators will continue to deny these treatments, because the ramifications for their effectiveness would prove they are criminals and mass murderers, and that a COVID vaccine and new COVID drugs are just simply not needed.
Then they would have to give the government back their $1 TRILLION + in funding to develop these drugs and treatments, and face charges in a court of law for mass murder by preventing these treatments, and attacking doctors who use them to save patients’ lives.
Real cures are just simply not profitable for Big Pharma and their Wall Street bankers who control the government, and they cannot be allowed.
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-09-20--Many have Fought and Died in Order to Protect Free Speech, but the Biggest Censorship Push in Histor

Many have Fought and Died in Order to Protect Free Speech, but the Biggest Censorship Push in History is Taking Place Today

Erasing History and Erasing Truth : Censorship and Destroying Records Is the Cornerstone of Tyrants “ If all mankind minus one were of one opinion , mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person than he , if he had the power , would be justified in silencing mankind.
” Tyranny requires that the truth be silenced , that real history be erased and rewritten , that speech be restricted , and that individual thought be silenced .
In this time of constant turmoil , false flags , wars , civil unrest , and now internal bio-terrorism @ @ @ @ @ @ @ of the state apparatus is to silence all dissent , and mandate conformity .
It is imperative considering the state ’ s plan for total control that it stifle criticism and retain the power to control the mainstream narrative , while aggressively eliminating all other resistance and questioning .
This is the state of the world that we live in today .
As things continue to deteriorate , nonconformance can not be allowed if global governance and a global reset are to be successful .
Current censorship has reached levels not seen in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ not seen in the past , and with all the advanced technology available , this nefarious plot to silence the thinkers and hide the truth could affect all forms of speech .
It is getting much more difficult to find truthful information , as those like Google , Amazon , YouTube , Facebook , Twitter , and many other venues are eliminating content and access to content at a blistering pace .
A day rarely goes by without something I am reading or researching on these sites being taken down or hidden .
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ consumed by propaganda alone , thus guaranteeing that only the state narrative will be presented in any mainstream or easily accessible format .
This is a dangerous situation , especially considering the likelihood that through vaccination or other methods , much of the population could soon become subject to transhuman experimentation where injectable nanoparticles and chips could be used to alter human behavior .
Tyrants throughout human history have censored writing and speech in order to protect their power structure This is not a new phenomenon , as tyrants throughout human history have @ @ @ @ @ @ @ protect their power structure .
Power is always troubled by any that dare to think , and any that dare to question .
In ancient times and not so ancient times , books were burned to keep the populace from having access to any material that was not acceptable by the throne or by the current political authority .
In cases of resistance to ‘ high ’ authority , many were also killed by the state , and in many cases these ‘ cleansings ’ were targeted to the educated class , because @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and express their ideas publicly .
Those that held power by force of arms would never allow criticism and dissent , because that could lead to hostility and insurrection by the people .
In this time of Covid and this fake virus pandemic , things have changed in part , but much is as it has always been throughout history .
This is one reason that history is so important , because regardless of progress and innovation , the underlying motives of the ruling class have changed little over time .
Money , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the key concerns of the ruling class , it is just that the methods to keep that power and control have changed .
Instead of the sword and guillotine , propaganda and fear have become the primary tools used to fool the people into compliance .
In order for propaganda to work , elimination of dissent is imperative .
Censorship plays a huge role in any effort to gain support of the masses , because without the possibility to reach the bulk of the people , the truth tellers become marginalized , and @ @ @ @ @ @ @ conspiracy theorists .
Many have fought and died in order to protect free speech , but the biggest censorship push in history is taking place today The biggest censorship push in history is taking place today , which means that the biggest propaganda push is also underway .
This false flag event called the coronavirus pandemic is not about one king seeking control over his subjects , but is about the few attempting to take over the entire planet .
This is a global effort that is run by the few top claimed @ @ @ @ @ @ @ reaching almost every country on earth through control of the banks , corporations , foundations , and the entire political class system .
Many have fought and died in order to protect free speech , but all speech is now under attack by the forces of evil .
If the globalists have their way , free speech will be lost forever .
This is the world of the Internet and computerized system saturation .
Censorship today takes on a new look meant to accomplish the same goals as in the past .
Blacklisting @ @ @ @ @ @ @ manipulation allow for the state to control information , and with that control of information , it stands to reason that the general public will then be easier to manipulate and keep in check .
The acceptance of tracking and tracing technology , continued isolation , vaccines capable of altering the DNA structure of individuals , chips and dyes mimicking the mark of the beast , and a continued state of fear will lead to an end of normalcy .
The result sought is a new order , a “ new normal , @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ruling ‘ experts ’ claiming to be able to sustain you , protect you , appease you , meet all your needs , and eliminate your worries .
This system is called technocracy , and is dependent on a societal class fully controlled by an upper class .
Does this sound familiar ?
It should , as that is the want of all tyrants , but in this day and age , it will look much different .
All of this relies on a willing public All of this relies on a willing @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that total compliance on a scale this large , the human spirit must be broken , and love , family , emotion , responsibility , open communication , mass gatherings , and debate must be squelched .
Once the pathetic masses accept this ruse , and acquiesce to the mandates coming , they will be transformed into a machine-like state through technological manipulation said to make life easier and more convenient .
A totally digitized system is necessary in order to retain constant control .
This may sound outlandish , and something akin @ @ @ @ @ @ @ but that is because that is exactly what it is .
The new world is coming , and by eliminating truth , eliminating our historical roots , and hiding all that is real and honest , what is left is a fantasy , but this fantasy will be deadly .
Seek the truth , seek honesty , ask questions , and believe nothing unless it can be personally verified .
Do not allow the takeover of your lives by these monsters claiming to be your saviors .
“ There is more than one @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the world is full of people running about with lit matches ” .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

Erasing History and Erasing Truth: Censorship and Destroying Records Is the Cornerstone of Tyrants
“If all mankind minus one were of one opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind.”
~ John Stuart Mill, On Liberty ch. 2 (1859)
By Gary D. Barnett
Lewrockwell.com
Tyranny requires that the truth be silenced, that real history be erased and rewritten, that speech be restricted, and that individual thought be silenced.
In this time of constant turmoil, false flags, wars, civil unrest, and now internal bio-terrorism and manufactured pandemics, a major agenda of the state apparatus is to silence all dissent, and mandate conformity.
It is imperative considering the state’s plan for total control that it stifle criticism and retain the power to control the mainstream narrative, while aggressively eliminating all other resistance and questioning.
This is the state of the world that we live in today. As things continue to deteriorate, nonconformance cannot be allowed if global governance and a global reset are to be successful.
Current censorship has reached levels not seen in the past
Current censorship has reached levels not seen in the past, and with all the advanced technology available, this nefarious plot to silence the thinkers and hide the truth could affect all forms of speech.
It is getting much more difficult to find truthful information, as those like Google, Amazon, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, and many other venues are eliminating content and access to content at a blistering pace.
A day rarely goes by without something I am reading or researching on these sites being taken down or hidden.
This can only lead to a world consumed by propaganda alone, thus guaranteeing that only the state narrative will be presented in any mainstream or easily accessible format.
This is a dangerous situation, especially considering the likelihood that through vaccination or other methods, much of the population could soon become subject to transhuman experimentation where injectable nanoparticles and chips could be used to alter human behavior.
Tyrants throughout human history have censored writing and speech in order to protect their power structure
This is not a new phenomenon, as tyrants throughout human history have censored writing and speech in order to protect their power structure.
Power is always troubled by any that dare to think, and any that dare to question.
In ancient times and not so ancient times, books were burned to keep the populace from having access to any material that was not acceptable by the throne or by the current political authority.
In cases of resistance to ‘high’ authority, many were also killed by the state, and in many cases these ‘cleansings’ were targeted to the educated class, because they had the capability to think critically and express their ideas publicly.
Those that held power by force of arms would never allow criticism and dissent, because that could lead to hostility and insurrection by the people.
In this time of Covid and this fake virus pandemic, things have changed in part, but much is as it has always been throughout history.
This is one reason that history is so important, because regardless of progress and innovation, the underlying motives of the ruling class have changed little over time.
Money, power, and control have always been the key concerns of the ruling class, it is just that the methods to keep that power and control have changed.
Instead of the sword and guillotine, propaganda and fear have become the primary tools used to fool the people into compliance. In order for propaganda to work, elimination of dissent is imperative.
Censorship plays a huge role in any effort to gain support of the masses, because without the possibility to reach the bulk of the people, the truth tellers become marginalized, and are shunned and ridiculed as troublemakers and conspiracy theorists.
Many have fought and died in order to protect free speech, but the biggest censorship push in history is taking place today
The biggest censorship push in history is taking place today, which means that the biggest propaganda push is also underway.
This false flag event called the coronavirus pandemic is not about one king seeking control over his subjects, but is about the few attempting to take over the entire planet.
This is a global effort that is run by the few top claimed elites, with their tentacles of power reaching almost every country on earth through control of the banks, corporations, foundations, and the entire political class system.
Many have fought and died in order to protect free speech, but all speech is now under attack by the forces of evil.
If the globalists have their way, free speech will be lost forever.
This is the world of the Internet and computerized system saturation. Censorship today takes on a new look meant to accomplish the same goals as in the past.
Blacklisting users, blocking content, and algorithmic manipulation allow for the state to control information, and with that control of information, it stands to reason that the general public will then be easier to manipulate and keep in check.
The acceptance of tracking and tracing technology, continued isolation, vaccines capable of altering the DNA structure of individuals, chips and dyes mimicking the mark of the beast, and a continued state of fear will lead to an end of normalcy.
The result sought is a new order, a “new normal,” that will be totally controlled by ruling ‘experts’ claiming to be able to sustain you, protect you, appease you, meet all your needs, and eliminate your worries.
This system is called technocracy, and is dependent on a societal class fully controlled by an upper class.
Does this sound familiar? It should, as that is the want of all tyrants, but in this day and age, it will look much different.
All of this relies on a willing public
All of this relies on a willing public, and in order to achieve that total compliance on a scale this large, the human spirit must be broken, and love, family, emotion, responsibility, open communication, mass gatherings, and debate must be squelched.
Once the pathetic masses accept this ruse, and acquiesce to the mandates coming, they will be transformed into a machine-like state through technological manipulation said to make life easier and more convenient.
A totally digitized system is necessary in order to retain constant control. This may sound outlandish, and something akin to a dystopian science fiction novel, but that is because that is exactly what it is.
The new world is coming, and by eliminating truth, eliminating our historical roots, and hiding all that is real and honest, what is left is a fantasy, but this fantasy will be deadly.
Seek the truth, seek honesty, ask questions, and believe nothing unless it can be personally verified. Do not allow the takeover of your lives by these monsters claiming to be your saviors.
“There is more than one way to burn a book. And the world is full of people running about with lit matches”.
~ Ray Bradbury – “Fahrenheit 451: A Novel,” (1953). p. 209, Simon and Schuster
Republished from Lewrockwell.com
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-09-22--Study: COVID-19 Fatality Fate “Worst Miscalculation in the History of Humanity”

This month , Dr. Ronald B .
Brown had a daring paper published in Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , conservatively entitled Public health lessons learned from biases in coronavirus mortality overestimation .
“ The subject of this article is disruptive , to say the least , although it is not as obvious from the title , ” Dr. Brown told me in an email .
“ The manuscript cites the smoking-gun , documented evidence showing that the public ’ s overreaction to the coronavirus pandemic was based on the worst miscalculation in the history of humanity , in @ @ @ @ @ @ @ intensive peer-review process .
You are the first media guy who has responded to my invitation.
” It ’ s sadly no surprise the media has not kept Dr. Brown ’ s phone ringing with interview requests .
The abstract , in itself , contains a firecracker where he says : “ Results of this critical appraisal reveal information bias and selection bias in coronavirus mortality overestimation , most likely caused by misclassifying an influenza infection fatality rate ( IFR ) as a case fatality rate ( CFR ) .
” Is that @ @ @ @ @ @ @ The number of people they said would be buried in mass COVID-19 graves better reflects how many people simply ended up with a cough and fever .
Dr. Brown added that CDC and WHO documents show that the case fatality rate for influenza was similar to the coronavirus , implying that the lockdowns were pointless .
His paper questions why the 2017-2018 influenza season in the United States did not “ receive the same intensive media coverage as COVID-19.
” He points out that “ the accuracy of coronavirus tests rushed into production @ @ @ @ @ @ @ he explores how the media began focusing on an increase in coronavirus cases while ignoring the decrease in death rates .
Much of the article looks at how lockdowns and anti-social distancing probably had little or no effect on reducing COVID-19 deaths .
He says that “ the public ’ s belief that mitigation measures were responsible for reducing coronavirus mortality may be a post hoc fallacy if lower mortality was actually due to the overestimation of coronavirus deaths.
” Speaking on the damage done by the counter-measures , Brown writes : “ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ campaigns needs to be reevaluated for the potential harm these strategies can cause.
” His report includes this mind-map on how we were all mind-warped : You can read Brown ’ s full paper at Cambridge University Press .
It succinctly dismisses the notion that the corona craze has anything to do with welfare of the people .
John C. A. Manley has spent over a decade ghostwriting for medical doctors , as well as naturopaths , chiropractors and Ayurvedic physicians .
He publishes the COVID-19 ( 84 ) Red Pill Posts – @ @ @ @ @ @ @ governments of the world from using an exaggerated pandemic as an excuse to violate our freedom , health , privacy , livelihood and humanity .
He is also writing a novel , COVID-27 : A Dystopian Love Story .
You can visit his website at : MuchAdoAboutCorona.ca Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

by John C. A. Manley
muchadoaboutcorona.ca
This month, Dr. Ronald B. Brown had a daring paper published in Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, conservatively entitled Public health lessons learned from biases in coronavirus mortality overestimation.
“The subject of this article is disruptive, to say the least, although it is not as obvious from the title,” Dr. Brown told me in an email. “The manuscript cites the smoking-gun, documented evidence showing that the public’s overreaction to the coronavirus pandemic was based on the worst miscalculation in the history of humanity, in my opinion. My manuscript underwent an intensive peer-review process. You are the first media guy who has responded to my invitation.”
It’s sadly no surprise the media has not kept Dr. Brown’s phone ringing with interview requests. The abstract, in itself, contains a firecracker where he says:
“Results of this critical appraisal reveal information bias and selection bias in coronavirus mortality overestimation, most likely caused by misclassifying an influenza infection fatality rate (IFR) as a case fatality rate (CFR).”
Is that not what we’ve seen? The number of people they said would be buried in mass COVID-19 graves better reflects how many people simply ended up with a cough and fever.
Dr. Brown added that CDC and WHO documents show that the case fatality rate for influenza was similar to the coronavirus, implying that the lockdowns were pointless. His paper questions why the 2017-2018 influenza season in the United States did not “receive the same intensive media coverage as COVID-19.”
He points out that “the accuracy of coronavirus tests rushed into production during the pandemic were unknown.” And he explores how the media began focusing on an increase in coronavirus cases while ignoring the decrease in death rates.
Much of the article looks at how lockdowns and anti-social distancing probably had little or no effect on reducing COVID-19 deaths. He says that “the public’s belief that mitigation measures were responsible for reducing coronavirus mortality may be a post hoc fallacy if lower mortality was actually due to the overestimation of coronavirus deaths.”
Speaking on the damage done by the counter-measures, Brown writes: “The ethics of implementing fear-based public health campaigns needs to be reevaluated for the potential harm these strategies can cause.”
His report includes this mind-map on how we were all mind-warped:
You can read Brown’s full paper at Cambridge University Press. It succinctly dismisses the notion that the corona craze has anything to do with welfare of the people.
As Albert Camus warned:
“The welfare of the people in particular has always been the alibi of tyrants, and it provides the further advantage of giving the servants of tyranny a good conscience.”
Read the full article at muchadoaboutcorona.ca
John C. A. Manley has spent over a decade ghostwriting for medical doctors, as well as naturopaths, chiropractors and Ayurvedic physicians. He publishes the COVID-19(84) Red Pill Posts – an email-based newsletter dedicated to preventing the governments of the world from using an exaggerated pandemic as an excuse to violate our freedom, health, privacy, livelihood and humanity. He is also writing a novel, COVID-27: A Dystopian Love Story. You can visit his website at: MuchAdoAboutCorona.ca
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-09-22--No, The U.S. Supreme Court Will Not Save Us

Justice Sleeps and ‘ We the People ’ Suffer : No , the U.S. Supreme Court Will Not Save Us “ The Constitution is not neutral .
It was designed to take the government off the backs of the people.
” —Justice William O. Douglas The U.S. Supreme Court will not save us .
It doesn ’ t matter which party gets to pick the replacement to fill Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg ’ s seat on the U.S. Supreme Court .
The battle that is gearing up right now is yet more distraction and spin to keep us oblivious to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the architects of the American Police State .
Americans can no longer rely on the courts to mete out justice .
Although the courts were established to serve as Courts of Justice , what we have been saddled with , instead , are Courts of Order .
This is true at all levels of the judiciary , but especially so in the highest court of the land , the U.S. Supreme Court , which is seemingly more concerned with establishing order and protecting government interests than with upholding the rights of the people @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a result , the police and other government agents have been generally empowered to probe , poke , pinch , taser , search , seize , strip and generally manhandle anyone they see fit in almost any circumstance , all with the general blessing of the courts .
Rarely do the concerns of the populace prevail .
When presented with an opportunity to loosen the government ’ s noose that keeps getting cinched tighter and tighter around the necks of the American people , what does our current Supreme Court usually do ?
@ @ @ @ @ @ @ .
Speaks to the narrowest possible concern .
More often than not , it gives the government and its corporate sponsors the benefit of the doubt , which leaves “ we the people ” hanging by a thread .
Rarely do the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court— preoccupied with their personal politics , cocooned in a world of privilege , partial to those with power , money and influence , and narrowly focused on a shrinking docket ( the court accepts on average 80 cases out of 8,000 each year ) —venture @ @ @ @ @ @ @ so often , the justices toss a bone to those who fear they have abdicated their allegiance to the Constitution .
Too often , however , the Supreme Court tends to march in lockstep with the police state .
In recent years , for example , the Court has ruled that police officers can use lethal force in car chases without fear of lawsuits ; police officers can stop cars based only on “ anonymous ” tips ; Secret Service agents are not accountable for their actions , as long as they ’ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ security ” ; citizens only have a right to remain silent if they assert it ; police have free reign to use drug-sniffing dogs as “ search warrants on leashes , ” justifying any and all police searches of vehicles stopped on the roadside ; police can forcibly take your DNA , whether or not you ’ ve been convicted of a crime ; police can stop , search , question and profile citizens and non-citizens alike ; police can subject Americans to virtual strip searches , no matter the “ offense ” @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a warrant , even if it ’ s the wrong home ; and it ’ s a crime to not identify yourself when a policeman asks your name .
The cases the Supreme Court refuses to hear , allowing lower court judgments to stand , are almost as critical as the ones they rule on .
Some of these cases have delivered devastating blows to the lives and rights enshrined in the Constitution .
By remaining silent , the Court has affirmed that : legally owning a firearm is enough to justify a @ @ @ @ @ @ @ can arrest and detain American citizens ; students can be subjected to random lockdowns and mass searches at school ; and police officers who don ’ t know their actions violate the law aren ’ t guilty of breaking the law .
You think you ’ ve got rights ?
Think again .
All of those freedoms we cherish—the ones enshrined in the Constitution , the ones that affirm our right to free speech and assembly , due process , privacy , bodily integrity , the right to not have police seize our @ @ @ @ @ @ @ and detain us without probable cause—amount to nothing when the government and its agents are allowed to disregard those prohibitions on government overreach at will .
This is the grim reality of life in the American police state .
In fact , our so-called rights have been reduced to technicalities in the face of the government ’ s ongoing power grabs .
In the police state being erected around us , the police can probe , poke , pinch , taser , search , seize , strip and generally manhandle anyone they see @ @ @ @ @ @ @ with the general blessing of the courts .
This is what one would call a slow death by a thousand cuts , only it ’ s the Fourth Amendment being inexorably bled to death by the very institution that is supposed to be protecting it ( and us ) from government abuse .
Remember , it was a unanimous Supreme Court which determined that police officers may use drug-sniffing dogs to conduct warrantless searches of cars during routine traffic stops .
That same Court gave police the green light to taser defenseless motorists @ @ @ @ @ @ @ minor incidents , and break down people ’ s front doors without evidence that they have done anything wrong .
Make no mistake about it : this is what constitutes “ law and order ” in the American police state .
These are the hallmarks of the emerging American police state , where police officers , no longer mere servants of the people entrusted with keeping the peace , are part of an elite ruling class dependent on keeping the masses corralled , under control , and treated like suspects and enemies rather @ @ @ @ @ @ @ police officers breaking through people ’ s front doors and shooting them dead in their homes or strip searching motorists on the side of the road , in a police state such as ours , these instances of abuse are not condemned by the government .
Rather , they are continually validated by a judicial system that kowtows to every police demand , no matter how unjust , no matter how in opposition to the Constitution .
Because the system is rigged and the U.S. Supreme Court—the so-called “ people ’ s court @ @ @ @ @ @ @ a gatekeeper of justice for its new role as maintainer of the status quo , the police state will keep winning and “ we the people ” will keep losing .
By refusing to accept any of the eight or so qualified immunity cases before it this past term that strove to hold police accountable for official misconduct , the Supreme Court delivered a chilling reminder that in the American police state , ‘ we the people ’ are at the mercy of law enforcement officers who have almost absolute discretion to decide @ @ @ @ @ @ @ resistance , and how harshly they can deal with the citizens they were appointed to ‘ serve and protect.
” This is how qualified immunity keeps the police state in power .
Lawyers tend to offer a lot of complicated , convoluted explanations for the doctrine of qualified immunity , which was intended to insulate government officials from frivolous lawsuits , but the real purpose of qualified immunity is to rig the system , ensuring that abusive agents of the government almost always win and the victims of government abuse almost always lose @ @ @ @ @ @ @ doctrine that requires victims of police violence to prove that their abusers knew their behavior was illegal because it had been deemed so in a nearly identical case at some prior time ?
A review of critical court rulings over the past several decades , including rulings affirming qualified immunity protections for government agents by the U.S. Supreme Court , reveals a startling and steady trend towards pro-police state rulings by an institution concerned more with establishing order , protecting the ruling class , and insulating government agents from charges of wrongdoing than @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Constitution .
Indeed , as Reuters reports , qualified immunity “ has become a nearly failsafe tool to let police brutality go unpunished and deny victims their constitutional rights.
” Worse , as Reuters concluded , “ the Supreme Court has built qualified immunity into an often insurmountable police defense by intervening in cases mostly to favor the police.
” For those in need of a reminder of all the ways in which the Supreme Court has made us sitting ducks at the mercy of the American police state , let me offer @ @ @ @ @ @ @ court rulings in recent years , police can claim qualified immunity for warrantless searches .
Police can claim qualified immunity for warrantless arrests based on mere suspicion .
Police can claim qualified immunity for using excessive force against protesters .
Police can claim qualified immunity for shooting a fleeing suspect in the back .
Police can claim qualified immunity for shooting a mentally impaired person .
Police officers can use lethal force in car chases without fear of lawsuits .
Police can stop , arrest and search citizens without reasonable suspicion or probable @ @ @ @ @ @ @ based on “ anonymous ” tips or for “ suspicious ” behavior such as having a reclined car seat or driving too carefully .
Police can forcibly take your DNA , whether or not you ’ ve been convicted of a crime .
Police can use the “ fear for my life ” rationale as an excuse for shooting unarmed individuals .
Police have free reign to use drug-sniffing dogs as “ search warrants on leashes.
” Not only are police largely protected by qualified immunity , but police dogs are also off @ @ @ @ @ @ @ subject Americans to strip searches , no matter the “ offense.
” Police can break into homes without a warrant , even if it ’ s the wrong home .
Police can use knock-and-talk tactics as a means of sidestepping the Fourth Amendment .
Police can carry out no-knock raids if they believe announcing themselves would be dangerous .
Police can recklessly open fire on anyone that might be “ armed.
” Police can destroy a home during a SWAT raid , even if the owner gives their consent to enter and search @ @ @ @ @ @ @ deliberately or inadvertently , in the process of subduing them .
To sum it up , we are dealing with a nationwide epidemic of court-sanctioned police violence carried out with impunity against individuals posing little or no real threat .
In this way , the justices of the United States Supreme Court—through their deference to police power , preference for security over freedom , and evisceration of our most basic rights for the sake of order and expediency—have become the architects of the American police state .
So where does that leave us @ @ @ @ @ @ @ that they ’ re living the American dream—where the government represents the people , where the people are equal in the eyes of the law , where the courts are arbiters of justice , where the police are keepers of the peace , and where the law is applied equally as a means of protecting the rights of the people—it ’ s time to wake up .
We no longer have a representative government , a rule of law , or justice .
Liberty has fallen to legalism .
Freedom has fallen to @ @ @ @ @ @ @ jaundiced and just plain unjust .
And for too many , the American dream of freedom and opportunity has turned into a living nightmare .
Given the turbulence of our age , with its police overreach , military training drills on American soil , domestic surveillance , SWAT team raids , asset forfeiture , wrongful convictions , profit-driven prisons , and corporate corruption , the need for a guardian of the people ’ s rights has never been greater .
Yet as I make clear in my book Battlefield America : The War @ @ @ @ @ @ @ the president , nor the legislatures , nor the courts will save us from the police state that holds us in its clutches .
So we can waste our strength over the next few weeks and months raging over the makeup of the Supreme Court or we can stand united against the tyrant in our midst .
After all , the president , the legislatures , and the courts are all on the government ’ s payroll .
They are the police state .
Constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Battlefield America : The War on the American People is available at .
Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

Justice Sleeps and ‘We the People’ Suffer: No, the U.S. Supreme Court Will Not Save Us
“The Constitution is not neutral. It was designed to take the government off the backs of the people.”—Justice William O. Douglas
By John W. Whitehead
The Rutherford Institute
The U.S. Supreme Court will not save us.
It doesn’t matter which party gets to pick the replacement to fill Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg’s seat on the U.S. Supreme Court.
The battle that is gearing up right now is yet more distraction and spin to keep us oblivious to the steady encroachment on our rights by the architects of the American Police State.
Americans can no longer rely on the courts to mete out justice.
Although the courts were established to serve as Courts of Justice, what we have been saddled with, instead, are Courts of Order. This is true at all levels of the judiciary, but especially so in the highest court of the land, the U.S. Supreme Court, which is seemingly more concerned with establishing order and protecting government interests than with upholding the rights of the people enshrined in the U.S. Constitution.
As a result, the police and other government agents have been generally empowered to probe, poke, pinch, taser, search, seize, strip and generally manhandle anyone they see fit in almost any circumstance, all with the general blessing of the courts.
Rarely do the concerns of the populace prevail.
When presented with an opportunity to loosen the government’s noose that keeps getting cinched tighter and tighter around the necks of the American people, what does our current Supreme Court usually do?
It ducks. Prevaricates. Remains silent. Speaks to the narrowest possible concern.
More often than not, it gives the government and its corporate sponsors the benefit of the doubt, which leaves “we the people” hanging by a thread.
Rarely do the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court— preoccupied with their personal politics, cocooned in a world of privilege, partial to those with power, money and influence, and narrowly focused on a shrinking docket (the court accepts on average 80 cases out of 8,000 each year)—venture beyond their rarefied comfort zones.
Every so often, the justices toss a bone to those who fear they have abdicated their allegiance to the Constitution. Too often, however, the Supreme Court tends to march in lockstep with the police state.
In recent years, for example, the Court has ruled that police officers can use lethal force in car chases without fear of lawsuits; police officers can stop cars based only on “anonymous” tips; Secret Service agents are not accountable for their actions, as long as they’re done in the name of “security”; citizens only have a right to remain silent if they assert it; police have free reign to use drug-sniffing dogs as “search warrants on leashes,” justifying any and all police searches of vehicles stopped on the roadside; police can forcibly take your DNA, whether or not you’ve been convicted of a crime; police can stop, search, question and profile citizens and non-citizens alike; police can subject Americans to virtual strip searches, no matter the “offense”; police can break into homes without a warrant, even if it’s the wrong home; and it’s a crime to not identify yourself when a policeman asks your name.
The cases the Supreme Court refuses to hear, allowing lower court judgments to stand, are almost as critical as the ones they rule on. Some of these cases have delivered devastating blows to the lives and rights enshrined in the Constitution.
By remaining silent, the Court has affirmed that: legally owning a firearm is enough to justify a no-knock raid by police; the military can arrest and detain American citizens; students can be subjected to random lockdowns and mass searches at school; and police officers who don’t know their actions violate the law aren’t guilty of breaking the law.
You think you’ve got rights? Think again.
All of those freedoms we cherish—the ones enshrined in the Constitution, the ones that affirm our right to free speech and assembly, due process, privacy, bodily integrity, the right to not have police seize our property without a warrant, or search and detain us without probable cause—amount to nothing when the government and its agents are allowed to disregard those prohibitions on government overreach at will.
This is the grim reality of life in the American police state.
In fact, our so-called rights have been reduced to technicalities in the face of the government’s ongoing power grabs.
In the police state being erected around us, the police can probe, poke, pinch, taser, search, seize, strip and generally manhandle anyone they see fit in almost any circumstance, all with the general blessing of the courts.
This is what one would call a slow death by a thousand cuts, only it’s the Fourth Amendment being inexorably bled to death by the very institution that is supposed to be protecting it (and us) from government abuse.
Remember, it was a unanimous Supreme Court which determined that police officers may use drug-sniffing dogs to conduct warrantless searches of cars during routine traffic stops. That same Court gave police the green light to taser defenseless motorists, strip search non-violent suspects arrested for minor incidents, and break down people’s front doors without evidence that they have done anything wrong.
Make no mistake about it: this is what constitutes “law and order” in the American police state.
These are the hallmarks of the emerging American police state, where police officers, no longer mere servants of the people entrusted with keeping the peace, are part of an elite ruling class dependent on keeping the masses corralled, under control, and treated like suspects and enemies rather than citizens.
Whether it’s police officers breaking through people’s front doors and shooting them dead in their homes or strip searching motorists on the side of the road, in a police state such as ours, these instances of abuse are not condemned by the government. Rather, they are continually validated by a judicial system that kowtows to every police demand, no matter how unjust, no matter how in opposition to the Constitution.
The system is rigged.
Because the system is rigged and the U.S. Supreme Court—the so-called “people’s court”—has exchanged its appointed role as a gatekeeper of justice for its new role as maintainer of the status quo, the police state will keep winning and “we the people” will keep losing.
By refusing to accept any of the eight or so qualified immunity cases before it this past term that strove to hold police accountable for official misconduct, the Supreme Court delivered a chilling reminder that in the American police state, ‘we the people’ are at the mercy of law enforcement officers who have almost absolute discretion to decide who is a threat, what constitutes resistance, and how harshly they can deal with the citizens they were appointed to ‘serve and protect.”
This is how qualified immunity keeps the police state in power.
Lawyers tend to offer a lot of complicated, convoluted explanations for the doctrine of qualified immunity, which was intended to insulate government officials from frivolous lawsuits, but the real purpose of qualified immunity is to rig the system, ensuring that abusive agents of the government almost always win and the victims of government abuse almost always lose.
How else do you explain a doctrine that requires victims of police violence to prove that their abusers knew their behavior was illegal because it had been deemed so in a nearly identical case at some prior time?
It’s a setup for failure.
A review of critical court rulings over the past several decades, including rulings affirming qualified immunity protections for government agents by the U.S. Supreme Court, reveals a startling and steady trend towards pro-police state rulings by an institution concerned more with establishing order, protecting the ruling class, and insulating government agents from charges of wrongdoing than with upholding the rights enshrined in the Constitution.
Indeed, as Reuters reports, qualified immunity “has become a nearly failsafe tool to let police brutality go unpunished and deny victims their constitutional rights.”
Worse, as Reuters concluded, “the Supreme Court has built qualified immunity into an often insurmountable police defense by intervening in cases mostly to favor the police.”
For those in need of a reminder of all the ways in which the Supreme Court has made us sitting ducks at the mercy of the American police state, let me offer the following.
As a result of court rulings in recent years, police can claim qualified immunity for warrantless searches. Police can claim qualified immunity for warrantless arrests based on mere suspicion. Police can claim qualified immunity for using excessive force against protesters. Police can claim qualified immunity for shooting a fleeing suspect in the back. Police can claim qualified immunity for shooting a mentally impaired person. Police officers can use lethal force in car chases without fear of lawsuits. Police can stop, arrest and search citizens without reasonable suspicion or probable cause.
Police officers can stop cars based on “anonymous” tips or for “suspicious” behavior such as having a reclined car seat or driving too carefully. Police can forcibly take your DNA, whether or not you’ve been convicted of a crime. Police can use the “fear for my life” rationale as an excuse for shooting unarmed individuals. Police have free reign to use drug-sniffing dogs as “search warrants on leashes.” Not only are police largely protected by qualified immunity, but police dogs are also off the hook for wrongdoing.
Police can subject Americans to strip searches, no matter the “offense.” Police can break into homes without a warrant, even if it’s the wrong home. Police can use knock-and-talk tactics as a means of sidestepping the Fourth Amendment.
Police can carry out no-knock raids if they believe announcing themselves would be dangerous. Police can recklessly open fire on anyone that might be “armed.” Police can destroy a home during a SWAT raid, even if the owner gives their consent to enter and search it. Police can suffocate someone, deliberately or inadvertently, in the process of subduing them.
To sum it up, we are dealing with a nationwide epidemic of court-sanctioned police violence carried out with impunity against individuals posing little or no real threat.
In this way, the justices of the United States Supreme Court—through their deference to police power, preference for security over freedom, and evisceration of our most basic rights for the sake of order and expediency—have become the architects of the American police state.
So where does that leave us?
For those deluded enough to believe that they’re living the American dream—where the government represents the people, where the people are equal in the eyes of the law, where the courts are arbiters of justice, where the police are keepers of the peace, and where the law is applied equally as a means of protecting the rights of the people—it’s time to wake up.
We no longer have a representative government, a rule of law, or justice.
Liberty has fallen to legalism. Freedom has fallen to fascism.
Justice has become jaded, jaundiced and just plain unjust.
And for too many, the American dream of freedom and opportunity has turned into a living nightmare.
Given the turbulence of our age, with its police overreach, military training drills on American soil, domestic surveillance, SWAT team raids, asset forfeiture, wrongful convictions, profit-driven prisons, and corporate corruption, the need for a guardian of the people’s rights has never been greater.
Yet as I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People,, neither the president, nor the legislatures, nor the courts will save us from the police state that holds us in its clutches.
So we can waste our strength over the next few weeks and months raging over the makeup of the Supreme Court or we can stand united against the tyrant in our midst.
After all, the president, the legislatures, and the courts are all on the government’s payroll.
They are the police state.
ABOUT JOHN W. WHITEHEAD
Constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder and president of The Rutherford Institute . His new book Battlefield America: The War on the American People is available at www.amazon.com .
See Also:


healthimpactnews--2020-09-23--How CDC/WHO will Fake the Effects of the COVID Vaccine to Make it Look Like a Success

Making a vaccine look like it ’ s a champion isn ’ t difficult for public health agencies .
There are a number of strategies .
Of course , these fraudulent strategies would be serious crimes .
But when has that stopped the CDC or the World Health Organization ?
In no particular order—- ONE : Rework the definition of a “ COVID case.
” Presently , the CDC absurdly allows doctors to diagnose a person with COVID who has a cough , or chills and fever , and lives in an area where cases are being claimed .
No @ @ @ @ @ @ @ , once the vaccine is approved .
Demand testing for a diagnosis .
State that cough alone is not enough .
Chills and fever must also be present .
Require fever to be above 100 .
These and other changes would automatically shrink the number of cases .
The drop in numbers would be attributed to the vaccine .
This “ definitional shrinking ” was , in fact , deployed in the 1950s , after the introduction of the polio vaccine .
TWO : Order a change in the way the PCR diagnostic @ @ @ @ @ @ @ amplifying the original test sample from the patient occurs in cycles , or jumps .
The greater the number of cycles , the more likely the test will result in a COVID diagnosis .
Therefore , order a reduced number of cycles for all testing labs .
THREE : Quietly restrict the present hospital practice of arbitrarily writing “ COVID ” on patient case and death files .
FOUR : Cook up and publish false studies showing more and more people are developing immunity to the virus .
Attribute this to the vaccine @ @ @ @ @ @ @ study— “ the transmission of the virus from person to person is slowing , thanks to the vaccine.
” SIX : Pump up the success of issuing Immunity certificates after vaccination .
“ People are feeling safer now .
More businesses are reopening… ” SEVEN : Using the compliant press , simply issue bald declarations that the vaccine is a success .
EIGHT : Hide the many instances of injury and death from the vaccine .
When necessary , claim COVID was the cause .
NINE : Warn that the wonderful vaccine-derived immunity @ @ @ @ @ @ @ shots are necessary .
TEN : Rework the definition of “ vaccine-acquired immunity.
” Even a very weak antibody response from the shot would qualify as “ protective immunity.
” ELEVEN : Huge numbers of people with ordinary flu-like illness , pneumonia , and other traditional lung infections are being called “ COVID.
” Change this practice .
Go back to calling many of these people “ flu , ” “ pneumonia , ” etc .
COVID case numbers will drop .
Claim the drop is the effect of the vaccine .
TWELVE @ @ @ @ @ @ @ cases have “ co-morbidities.
” These are prior serious health conditions which are , in fact , the true causes of illnesses and death .
Of course , this is denied .
But after the vaccine is introduced… scale back the practice of counting all these ill and deceased co-morbid patients as “ COVID.
” Case and death numbers will drop .
Claim the vaccine is the reason .
THIRTEEN : After the vaccine is introduced , slow down testing for a brief period .
This will automatically reduce the rate of new @ @ @ @ @ @ @ vaccine .
Committing these crimes are a walk in the park for public health agencies .
And appointing official mouthpieces to carry lies to the public is as easy as training little Faucis to sit up and bark .
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com Having problems receiving our newsletters ?
See : How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist ( kidney doctor ) , Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people .
In this autobiography she explains why @ @ @ @ @ @ @ corrupt medical system from practicing real , ethical medicine .
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines , no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public .
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children , and even adults .
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact , part of the Health Impact News network .

by Jon Rappoport
NoMoreFakeNews
Making a vaccine look like it’s a champion isn’t difficult for public health agencies. There are a number of strategies.
Of course, these fraudulent strategies would be serious crimes. But when has that stopped the CDC or the World Health Organization?
In no particular order—-
ONE: Rework the definition of a “COVID case.” Presently, the CDC absurdly allows doctors to diagnose a person with COVID who has a cough, or chills and fever, and lives in an area where cases are being claimed. No test necessary.
So change this practice, once the vaccine is approved. Demand testing for a diagnosis. State that cough alone is not enough. Chills and fever must also be present. Require fever to be above 100.
These and other changes would automatically shrink the number of cases. The drop in numbers would be attributed to the vaccine.
This “definitional shrinking” was, in fact, deployed in the 1950s, after the introduction of the polio vaccine.
TWO: Order a change in the way the PCR diagnostic test is done. The practice of amplifying the original test sample from the patient occurs in cycles, or jumps. The greater the number of cycles, the more likely the test will result in a COVID diagnosis. Therefore, order a reduced number of cycles for all testing labs.
Outcome? Fewer COVID diagnoses. Fewer case numbers. “The vaccine is working.”
THREE: Quietly restrict the present hospital practice of arbitrarily writing “COVID” on patient case and death files.
FOUR: Cook up and publish false studies showing more and more people are developing immunity to the virus. Attribute this to the vaccine.
FIVE: Another type of false study—“the transmission of the virus from person to person is slowing, thanks to the vaccine.”
SIX: Pump up the success of issuing Immunity certificates after vaccination. “People are feeling safer now. More businesses are reopening…”
SEVEN: Using the compliant press, simply issue bald declarations that the vaccine is a success.
EIGHT: Hide the many instances of injury and death from the vaccine. When necessary, claim COVID was the cause.
NINE: Warn that the wonderful vaccine-derived immunity is not permanent, and frequent booster shots are necessary.
TEN: Rework the definition of “vaccine-acquired immunity.” Even a very weak antibody response from the shot would qualify as “protective immunity.”
ELEVEN: Huge numbers of people with ordinary flu-like illness, pneumonia, and other traditional lung infections are being called “COVID.” Change this practice. Go back to calling many of these people “flu,” “pneumonia,” etc. COVID case numbers will drop. Claim the drop is the effect of the vaccine.
TWELVE: Presently, millions of so-called COVID cases have “co-morbidities.” These are prior serious health conditions which are, in fact, the true causes of illnesses and death. Of course, this is denied. But after the vaccine is introduced… scale back the practice of counting all these ill and deceased co-morbid patients as “COVID.” Case and death numbers will drop. Claim the vaccine is the reason.
THIRTEEN: After the vaccine is introduced, slow down testing for a brief period. This will automatically reduce the rate of new cases. Attribute the decline to the vaccine.
Committing these crimes are a walk in the park for public health agencies.
And appointing official mouthpieces to carry lies to the public is as easy as training little Faucis to sit up and bark.
Read the full article at NoMoreFakeNews
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com
See Also:
Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Book – The Vaccine Court “The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program” ORDER HERE!
Say NO to Mandatory Vaccines T-Shirt
100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
Order here!
Make a Statement for Health Freedom!
Big Pharma and government health authorities are trying to pass laws mandating vaccines for all children, and even adults.
Show your opposition to forced vaccinations and support the cause of Vaccine Impact, part of the Health Impact News network.
Order here!